National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for river protection-richland operations

  1. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Opperations Office | Department of Energy River Protection-Richland Opperations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland Opperations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Office of River Protection-Richland Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD December 31, 2015 CX-014441: Categorical Exclusion Determination MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Repair or Replacement of Pipelines CX(s) Applied: B5.4 Date: 12/31/2015 Location(s):

  2. Richland/Office of River Protection | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Richland/Office of River Protection Richland/Office of River Protection Below are compliance agreements and accompanying summaries for the Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection at the Hanford site. Settlement Agreement re: Washington v. Bodman, January 6, 2006 (49.77 KB) Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 (1.61 MB) Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 Summary (40.7 KB) Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 (224.55 KB)

  3. Waste Treatment Plant External Independent Review, Office of River Protection, Richland

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    External Independent Review (EIR).  On March 28 - April 1, the Office of Project Management Oversight and Assessments (PM) will lead the site visit for the first phase of the WTP Baseline Change...

  4. Savannah River Site - R-Area Groundwater Operable Unit | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    R-Area Groundwater Operable Unit Savannah River Site - R-Area Groundwater Operable Unit ... InstallationName, State: Savannah River Site, SC Responsible DOE Office: Savannah River ...

  5. Operational Pause at Savannah River Site Benefits Safety Culture, Operations

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    AIKEN, S.C. – EM and the Savannah River Site (SRS) management and operations contractor are seeing positive impacts on safety culture as the site works to restore operations following last year’s operational pause.

  6. PIA - Savannah River Operations Office Executive Commitment Action...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Operations Office Executive Commitment Action Tracking System PIA - Savannah River Operations Office Executive Commitment Action Tracking System PIA - Savannah River Operations ...

  7. PIA - Savannah River Site Management and Operating Contractor...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Site Management and Operating Contractor (HRMS) PIA - Savannah River Site Management and Operating Contractor (HRMS) PIA - Savannah River Site Management and Operating Contractor ...

  8. Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Operations: January...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    More Documents & Publications Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations: January - March 2006 Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations: ...

  9. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Savannah River Operations Office 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact ...

  10. PIA - Savannah River Operations Office Lotus Domino/Notes System...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Lotus DominoNotes System PDF icon PIA - Savannah River Operations Office Lotus DominoNotes System More Documents & Publications PIA - DOE Savannah River Operations Office PRISM ...

  11. Dennis Yates Of Savannah River Operations Named 2013 Facility...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Dennis Yates Of Savannah River Operations Named 2013 Facility Representative Of The Year Dennis Yates Of Savannah River Operations Named 2013 Facility Representative Of The Year ...

  12. 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Savannah River Operations...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Savannah River Operations Office. PDF icon NNSASROONEPA-APS-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office 2010 Annual ...

  13. John C. Barnes of Savannah River Operations named 2012 Facility...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    John C. Barnes of Savannah River Operations named 2012 Facility Representative of the Year John C. Barnes of Savannah River Operations named 2012 Facility Representative of the ...

  14. EA-2008: Colorado River Storage Project Programmatic Operations...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Project Programmatic Operations and Maintenance Project; Coconino, Maricopa, Navajo, ... EA-2008: Colorado River Storage Project Programmatic Operations and Maintenance Project; ...

  15. Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Operations: January and

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    February 2006 | Department of Energy Operations: January and February 2006 Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Operations: January and February 2006 Docket No. EO-05-01. Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Operations, January and February 2006 Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Operations (19.31 KB) More Documents & Publications Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations: January - March 2006 Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit

  16. PIA - Savannah River Operations Office Executive Commitment Action Tracking

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    System | Department of Energy Operations Office Executive Commitment Action Tracking System PIA - Savannah River Operations Office Executive Commitment Action Tracking System PIA - Savannah River Operations Office Executive Commitment Action Tracking System PIA - Savannah River Operations Office Executive Commitment Action Tracking System (2.9 MB) More Documents & Publications PIA - GovTrip (DOE data) PIA - Bonneville Power Adminstration Ethics Helpline

  17. PIA - Savannah River Site Management and Operating Contractor (HRMS) |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Site Management and Operating Contractor (HRMS) PIA - Savannah River Site Management and Operating Contractor (HRMS) PIA - Savannah River Site Management and Operating Contractor (HRMS) PIA - Savannah River Site Management and Operating Contractor (HRMS) (292.43 KB) More Documents & Publications PIA - Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) Human Resource Management System (HRMS) Integrated Safety Management Workshop Registration, PIA, Idaho National Laboratory PIA -

  18. Savannah River Site Contractor Resumes Full Operations Following Pause

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    AIKEN, S.C. – Savannah River Site management and operations contractor Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) has resumed full operations following an operational pause in September 2015, incorporating improvements and lessons learned across all projects and facilities. The HB Line facility emerged from a period of improvements called Deliberate Operations in April, the last of the SRNS operations to resume full operations.

  19. Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations:...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    January - March 2006 Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations: January - March 2006 Docket No. EO-05-01: Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit ...

  20. Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations:...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4, January - March 2006 Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations: Supplement 4, January - March 2006 Docket No. EO-05-01: Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River ...

  1. Dennis Yates Of Savannah River Operations Named 2013 Facility

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Representative Of The Year | Department of Energy Dennis Yates Of Savannah River Operations Named 2013 Facility Representative Of The Year Dennis Yates Of Savannah River Operations Named 2013 Facility Representative Of The Year May 27, 2014 - 10:24am Addthis Dennis Yates Of Savannah River Operations Named 2013 Facility Representative Of The Year About 200 Department of Energy (DOE) federal employees are Facility Representatives (FR) who provide day-to-day oversight of contractor operations

  2. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - Mission

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Mission Savannah River Operations Office Mission Welcome to the Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR) website. DOE-SR is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) organization that serves as the landlord for site resources and is responsible for overseeing the work performed by the Savannah River Site's (SRS) contractors. The Savannah River Site (SRS) is a key DOE industrial complex dedicated to; environmental cleanup, nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship, and nuclear materials disposition, in

  3. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Jon Peschong, Deputy Assistant Manager for the River and Plateau, Department of Energy Richland Operations Office September 2014 2 Richland Cleanup Priorities * Maintain safe, secure and compliant activities, facilities and operations * Continue River Corridor cleanup, including remediation of 618-10 Burial Ground * Continue Plutonium Finishing Plant deactivation, decommissioning and demolition * Continue groundwater pump and treat operations, and implement additional groundwater remedies 3

  4. Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Operations Office - July 2013

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    | Department of Energy Operations Office - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Operations Office - July 2013 July 2013 Review of the Employee Concerns Program at the Savannah River Operations Office The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review was to evaluate DOE-SR processes and their implementation for addressing safety concerns reported by DOE, contractor, and subcontractor employees at the Savannah River Site (SRS). This targeted review was performed at

  5. John C. Barnes of Savannah River Operations named 2012 Facility

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Representative of the Year | Department of Energy John C. Barnes of Savannah River Operations named 2012 Facility Representative of the Year John C. Barnes of Savannah River Operations named 2012 Facility Representative of the Year August 20, 2013 - 8:27am Addthis John C. Barnes of Savannah River Operations named 2012 Facility Representative of the Year About 200 Department of Energy (DOE) federal employees are Facility Representatives (FR) who provide day-to-day oversight of contractor

  6. DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Contract at Hanford Site | Department of Energy Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site DOE Selects Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC for Tank Operations Contract at Hanford Site May 29, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS), LLC has been selected as the tank operations contractor to store, retrieve and treat Hanford tank waste and

  7. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Support; Chief Financial Officer U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office Douglas Hintze Douglas E. Hintze is the Assistant Manager for Mission Support and...

  8. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Savannah River Operations Office (SRS) (See also Environmental Management). ...

  9. Operational Pause at Savannah River Site Benefits Safety Culture...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The K Area Complex exited deliberate operations on Jan. 25 this year. AIKEN, S.C. - EM and the Savannah River Site (SRS) management and operations contractor are seeing positive ...

  10. Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Operations Office...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    - July 2013 July 2013 Review of the Employee Concerns Program at the Savannah River ... O 442.1, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM Independent Activity ...

  11. Contractor Fee Payments- Savannah River Operations Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    See the amount of fees earned on EM's major contracts for each evaluated fee period and the total contract to date at the Savannah River Site Office on these charts. 

  12. EM's Richland Operations Office Completes Chromium Cleanup along Columbia River

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. – EM’s Richland Operations Office and cleanup contractor Washington Closure Hanford have completed cleanup of chromium-contaminated soil along the Columbia River at the Hanford Site.

  13. EIS-0170: Columbia River System Operation Review, BPA Area

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Columbia River System Operation Review Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) evaluates the potential impacts of four alternatives that represent the likely range of allocations between the Federal and non-Federal projects.

  14. SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE AIKEN, SC 29802 NEWS MEDIA CONTACT...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    tanks received over the weekend at the Savannah River Site (SRS) have been successfully ... Full plant operations are currently scheduled for late 2015. -MORE- SR-2012-03 2 Newly ...

  15. Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations:...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Supplement 3, January and February 2006 Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations: Supplement 3, January and February 2006 Docket No. EO-05-01: Exhibit D: Mirant ...

  16. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    T. Zack Smith T. Zack Smith Deputy Manager U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office T. Zack Smith Mr. Smith is the Deputy Manager for the U. S. Department of ...

  17. CX-012333: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/03/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  18. CX-007779: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  19. CX-007778: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  20. CX-012727: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CHPRC Cleanup Actions CX(s) Applied: B6.1Date: 41849 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  1. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - Leadership -

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Sandra Waisley Sandra Waisley Sandra Waisley Assistant Manager for Organizational Culture, Safety, and Quality Assurance Management U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office Sandra Waisley Sandra Waisley serves as the Assistant Manager for Organizational Culture, Safety, and Quality Assurance Management for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Operations Office (SR) in Aiken, South Carolina. In this role, Ms. Waisley leads the overall management and

  2. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Stacy Charboneau, Assistant Manager for Safety and Environment, Department of Energy Richland Operations Office June 2014 2 Richland Cleanup Priorities * Maintain safe, secure and compliant activities, facilities and operations * Continue River Corridor cleanup, including remediation of 618-10 Burial Ground * Continue Plutonium Finishing Plant deactivation, decommissioning and demolition * Continue groundwater pump and treat operations, and implement additional groundwater remedies 3 Richland

  3. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - Leadership -

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Dr. David C. Moody Dr. David C. Moody Dr. David C. Moody Manager U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office Dr. David C. Moody Dr. Moody is the Manager of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Operations Office (SR) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. He is a career member of the Senior Executive Service with more than 36 years of experience in the fields of environmental science and nuclear chemistry. As DOE-SR Manager, Dr. Moody oversees

  4. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - Home

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Savannah River Site Operator: 803-725-6211 Department of Energy Mailing Address: Savannah River Operations Office, P.O. Box A, Aiken, SC 29802 Employment: www.usajobs.gov Employment Verification: SR Human Resources Advisory Office - (803) 952-7856 Fax: (803) 952-7711 Media: Office of External Affairs, 803-952-7697 Websites: http://sro.srs.gov and www.srs.gov National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Mailing Address: NNSA - Savannah River Field Office, P.O. Box A, Aiken, SC 29802 Main

  5. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - Contacts

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Contacts Contacts Savannah River Operations Office U. S. Department of Energy P. O. Box A Aiken, SC 29802 Office of External Affairs - (803) 952-7697 DOE Seal U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office P. O. Box A Aiken, SC 29802 (803) 952-7697 Site Operator: (803) 725-6211 Feedback FOR EMPLOYEES: Citrix Secure Sign-In | Severe Weather Policy ABOUT THIS SITE: Site Map | Web Policies External Link | No Fear Act External Link | Privacy External Link | Information Quality External

  6. DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Savannah River Site | Department of Energy Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The

  7. EIS-0351: Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam, Colorado River Storage Project, Colorado River, UT

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (Secretary), acting through the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), is considering whether to implement a proposed action under which Flaming Gorge Dam would be operated to achieve the flow and temperature regimes recommended in the September 2000 report Flow and Temperature Recommendations for Endangered Fishes in the Green River Downstream of Flaming Gorge Dam (2000 Flow and Temperature Recommendations), published by the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program).

  8. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Cleanup Progress Update Hanford Advisory Board Greg Jones Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Assistant Manger for Business and Finance March 2014 2 Richland Operations Office * Site landlord (utilities, security, emergency services) * Move buried waste, contaminated soil away from Columbia River * Treat contaminated groundwater * Deactivate and decommission facilities * Isolate/contain contamination on Central Plateau * Approx. 4,300 contractor and federal employees 3 Richland

  9. Supplement Number 5 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Supplement Number 5 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance ...

  10. Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations: Supplement 4, January- March 2006

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Docket No. EO-05-01: Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations in support of Supplement Number 4 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC

  11. Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations: Supplement 3, January and February 2006

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Docket No. EO-05-01: Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations, part of Supplement Number 3 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC

  12. Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations: January- March 2006

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Docket No. EO-05-01: Exhibit D: Mirant Potomac River Schedule of Unit Operations related to Supplement Number 4 of the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC

  13. Supplement Number 2 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    2 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC Supplement Number 2 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-05-03: Pursuant to...

  14. Savannah River Site - C-Area Groundwater Operable Unit | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy - C-Area Groundwater Operable Unit Savannah River Site - C-Area Groundwater Operable Unit January 1, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis US Department of Energy Groundwater Database Groundwater Master Report InstallationName, State: Savannah River Site, SC Responsible DOE Office: Savannah River Site Plume Name: C-Area Groundwater Operable Unit Remediation Contractor: Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC PBS Number: 30 Report Last Updated: 2013 Contaminants Halogenated VOCs/SVOCs Present?: Yes VOC

  15. Savannah River Site - P-Area Groundwater Operable Unit | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy P-Area Groundwater Operable Unit Savannah River Site - P-Area Groundwater Operable Unit January 1, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis US Department of Energy Groundwater Database Groundwater Master Report InstallationName, State: Savannah River Site, SC Responsible DOE Office: Savannah River Site Plume Name: P-Area Groundwater Operable Unit Remediation Contractor: Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC PBS Number: 30 Report Last Updated: 2013 Contaminants Halogenated VOCs/SVOCs Present?: Yes VOC

  16. Wabash River coal gasification repowering project -- first year operation experience

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Troxclair, E.J.; Stultz, J.

    1997-12-31

    The Wabash River Coal Gasification Repowering Project (WRCGRP), a joint venture between Destec Energy, Inc. and PSI Energy, Inc., began commercial operation in November of 1995. The Project, selected by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) under the Clean Coal Program (Round IV) represents the largest operating coal gasification combined cycle plant in the world. This Demonstration Project has allowed PSI Energy to repower a 1950`s vintage steam turbine and install a new syngas fired combustion turbine to provide 262 MW (net) of electricity in a clean, efficient manner in a commercial utility setting while utilizing locally mined high sulfur Indiana bituminous coal. In doing so, the Project is also demonstrating some novel technology while advancing the commercialization of integrated coal gasification combined cycle technology. This paper discusses the first year operation experience of the Wabash Project, focusing on the progress towards achievement of the demonstration objectives.

  17. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - Tenant

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Organizations Organizations Tenant Organizations Federal Offices National Nuclear Security Administration External Link Office of Environmental Management External Link U. S. Forest Service - Savannah River External Link Contractor Organizations Savannah River Nuclear Solutions External Link Savannah River National Laboratory External Link Savannah River Remediation External Link Centerra University of Georgia - Savannah River Ecology Laboratory External Link Shaw AREVA MOX Services External

  18. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Americium Recovery Facility (The "McCluskey Room") Presented to River and Plateau Committee Hanford Advisory Board John Silko U.S Department of Energy Richland Operations Office 1 2 Americium Recovery Facility (The "McCluskey Room") 200 Area Central Plateau looking west (June 16, 2005) 3 Americium Recovery Facility (The "McCluskey Room") Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) before construction of 242-Z Americium Recovery Facility (ARF); also known as "McCluskey

  19. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Small Business Forum Technology Demos & opportunities The Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management, Savannah River Site and the Savannah River National Laboratory ...

  20. 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Richland Operations Office and the Office of River Protection

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the Richland Operations Office and the Office of River Protection.

  1. 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the NNSA Savannah River Operations Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the NNSA Savannah River Operations Office.

  2. 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of River Protection and Richland Operations Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Office of River Protection and Richland Operations Office.

  3. Operational Readiness Review: Savannah River Replacement Tritium Facility

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-02-01

    The Operational Readiness Review (ORR) is one of several activities to be completed prior to introducing tritium into the Replacement Tritium Facility (RTF) at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The Secretary of Energy will rely in part on the results of this ORR in deciding whether the startup criteria for RTF have been met. The RTF is a new underground facility built to safely service the remaining nuclear weapons stockpile. At RTF, tritium will be unloaded from old components, purified and enriched, and loaded into new or reclaimed reservoirs. The RTF will replace an aging facility at SRS that has processed tritium for more than 35 years. RTF has completed construction and is undergoing facility startup testing. The final stages of this testing will require the introduction of limited amounts of tritium. The US Department of Energy (DOE) ORR was conducted January 19 to February 4, 1993, in accordance with an ORR review plan which was developed considering previous readiness reviews. The plan also considered the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Recommendations 90-4 and 92-6, and the judgements of experienced senior experts. The review covered three major areas: (1) Plant and Equipment Readiness, (2) Personnel Readiness, and (3) Management Systems. The ORR Team was comprised of approximately 30 members consisting of a Team Leader, Senior Safety Experts, and Technical Experts. The ORR objectives and criteria were based on DOE Orders, industry standards, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations guidelines, recommendations of external oversight groups, and experience of the team members.

  4. CX-009680: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Cleanup Actions CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  5. CX-007978: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  6. CX-009695: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Small-Scale Mercury Spill Cleanup CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  7. CX-009688: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Placing a Facility in an Environmentally Safe Condition CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  8. CX-009678: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Workplace Enhancements CX(s) Applied: B2.1 Date: 12/18/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  9. CX-009686: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  10. CX-009690: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  11. CX-009672: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Relocation of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  12. CX-009691: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  13. CX-009682: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Asbestos Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  14. CX-009689: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Disconnection of Utilities CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  15. CX-009674: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Actions to Conserve Energy or Water CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  16. CX-009673: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  17. CX-009675: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Oil Spill Cleanup CX(s) Applied: B5.6 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  18. CX-009684: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Outdoor Tests and Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  19. CX-009683: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Tanks and Equipment to Control Runoff and Spills CX(s) Applied: B1.6 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  20. CX-009676: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Polychlorinated Biphenyl Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  1. CX-009671: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Demolition and Disposal of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  2. CX-009687: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Installation or Relocation of Machinery and Equipment CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  3. Savannah River Site Crane Operators Show Dedication, Skill in Complex Work

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    AIKEN, S.C. – Savannah River Site (SRS) H Canyon operations have changed substantially since the facility’s construction in 1950, but the training, dedication, and skill of its crane operators have not.

  4. Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Re: Potomac River Generating Station Department of Energy Case No. EO-05-01: Advanced Notice of Power Outages. Docket No. EO-05-01: Further Notice of 230kV Circuit Planned Outages

  5. CX-008858: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Siting, Modifying and Operating Support Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 08/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  6. Supplement Number 3 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 3 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC Supplement Number 3 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC Docket No. EO-05-01:Pursuant to Section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, 16 USC §824a(c), Section 301 (b) of the Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 USC §7151 (b), and Order No. 202-05-3, issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE" or the "Department") on December 20, 2005 ("Order"), Mirant Potomac River, LLC

  7. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) Closure Update River & Plateau Committee Hanford Advisory Board Bryan Foley, Acting Federal Project Director PFP Closure Project June 10, 2014 2014 The Future 2 Plutonium Finishing Plant * Mission: Safely and compliantly demolish PFP to slab-on-grade by 2016 PFP: plutonium processing facility decades past its design life 3 PFP Recent Accomplishments * Continued Glovebox/Hood deactivation activities: * Removed HC-17 (HC-17P, HC-17DC, HC-17SBB) in March *

  8. CX-014454: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Polychlorinated Biphenyl Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.17Date: 12/31/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  9. CX-012324: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    300-296 Waste Site Retrieval Pilot Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/09/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  10. CX-009226: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Routine Maintenance and Custodial Services CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/04/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  11. CX-006835: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    241-T Tank Farm Debris Barrier FenceCX(s) Applied: B1.11Date: 08/22/2011Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office

  12. CX-007776: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Placing a Facility in an Environmentally Safe Condition CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  13. CX-006843: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ER52 Fire Station Warning SignalsCX(s) Applied: B2.2Date: 09/26/2011Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office

  14. CX-007984: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Explosives Research Capability Expansion, 300 Area, Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  15. CX-010710: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reconfiguration Of Export Water System at 181-D under Project L-781 CX(s) Applied: B5.2 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  16. CX-012326: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PNNL Involving Facility, Safety, and Environmental Improvements in the 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 06/24/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  17. CX-012331: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements CX(s) Applied: B2.6 Date: 06/03/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  18. CX-010539: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Microbiological & Biomedical Research in the 300 Area - 2013 CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 06/13/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  19. CX-008861: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biomedical Research 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 08/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  20. CX-012208: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Microbiological and Biomedical Research Projects in the 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 05/21/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  1. CX-009224: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Project L-718, Electrical Utilities Transformer Management Support Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/04/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  2. CX-007503: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    331 Aquatic Research Laboratory Upgrades at the 331 Building CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/15/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  3. CX-014460: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Training Exercises and Simulations CX(s) Applied: B1.2Date: 12/31/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  4. CX-012209: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Small-Scale Research and Development Projects Using Nanoscale Materials, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B3.15 Date: 05/21/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  5. CX-007504: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    300 Area Nanoscale Research and Development Projects CX(s) Applied: B3.15, A9, B3.6 Date: 12/06/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  6. CX-010540: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Small-Scale Research and Development Projects Using Nanoscale Materials, 300 Area, Richland, Washington CX(s) Applied: B3.15 Date: 06/24/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  7. CX-012323: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Radiological Survey 600 Area Supporting Land CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 07/09/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  8. CX-008825: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nesting Bird Deterrent Study at the 241-C Tank Farm CX(s) Applied: B3.8 Date: 07/26/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  9. CX-006840: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Security Barrier Relocation at the 618-11 Burial GroundsCX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 09/19/2011Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office

  10. CX-007777: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Disconnection of Utilities CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  11. CX-007775: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Installation or Relocation of Machinery and Equipment CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  12. CX-012103: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Capability Enhancement at the 325 Hazardous Waste Treatment Units CX(s) Applied: B6.6 Date: 04/16/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  13. CX-010709: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    White Bluffs Bank Building Renovation CX(s) Applied: B3.14 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  14. CX-012328: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PNNL Projects Involving Routine Maintenance in the 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/03/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  15. CX-014458: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Routine Maintenance and Custodial Services CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 12/31/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  16. CX-014285: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CHPRC Routine Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 10/14/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  17. CX-006839: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Training Exercises and Simulations on the Hanford SiteCX(s) Applied: B1.2Date: 09/19/2011Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  18. CX-009221: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Rerouting of Power Lines at 100-D Reactor in Support of Site Remediation CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 09/24/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  19. CX-009222: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 09/24/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  20. CX-014282: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CHPRC Cleanup Actions CX(s) Applied: B6.1Date: 10/14/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  1. CX-014451: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Installation or Relocation of Machinery and Equipment CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 12/31/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  2. CX-006065: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical FacilitiesCX(s) Applied: B3.12Date: 06/21/2011Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

  3. CX-009692: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Cleanup Actions, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  4. CX-009223: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Asbestos Removal Actions CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 08/03/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  5. CX-009219: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    300 Area Electrical Service Project CX(s) Applied: B4.12 Date: 10/02/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  6. CX-008182: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Project S-234, Patrol Training Academy Firing Range Realignment CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 03/28/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  7. CX-012332: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Relocation of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 06/03/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  8. CX-006088: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Siting, Construction and Operation of Support Buildings and Support StructuresCX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 06/21/2011Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

  9. CX-006067: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Indoor Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory OperationsCX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 06/21/2011Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

  10. CX-006071: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Relocation and Operation of Machinery and EquipmentCX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 06/20/2011Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

  11. CX-007781: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Limited Firebreak Maintenance on the Hanford Site During Calendar Year 2012 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  12. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix D: Exhibits.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    The Columbia River and its tributaries are the primary water system in the Pacific Northwest, draining some 219,000 square miles in seven states and another 39,500 square miles in British Columbia. Beginning in the 1930`s, the Columbia River has been significantly modified by construction of 30 major dams on the river and its tributaries, along with dozens of non-Federal projects. Construction and subsequent operation of these water development projects have contributed to eight primary uses of the river system, including navigation, flood control, irrigation, electric power generation, fish migration, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation, and water supply and quality considerations. Increasing stress on the water development of the Columbia River and its tributaries has led primary Federal agencies to undertake intensive analysis and evaluation of the operation of these projects. These agencies are the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, who operate the large Federal dams on the river, and the Bonneville Power Administration who sells the power generated at the dams. This review, termed the System Operation Review (SOR), has as its ultimate goal to define a strategy for future operation of the major Columbia River projects which effectively considers the needs of all river uses. This volume, Appendix D: Cultural resources appendix, Technical imput includes the following: Development of geomorphology based framework for cultural resources management, Dworshak Reservoir, Idaho; Impact profiles for SOR reservoirs; comments from the following Native American tribes: Burns Paiute Tribe; Coville Confederated Tribes; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation; Confederated Tribes and bands of the Yakama Indian Nation (comments); Nez Perce Tribe; Coeur D`Alene Tribe; Spokane Tribe of Indians; The confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation.

  13. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix N: Wildlife.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    The Columbia River System is a vast and complex combination of Federal and non-Federal facilities used for many purposes including power production, irrigation, navigation, flood control, recreation, fish and wildlife habitat and municipal and industrial water supply. Each river use competes for the limited water resources in the Columbia River Basin. This technical appendix addresses only the effects of alternative system operating strategies for managing the Columbia River system. The environmental impact statement (EIS) itself and some of the other appendices present analyses of the alternative approaches to the other three decisions considered as part of the SOR. This document is the product of the Wildlife Work Group, focusing on wildlife impacts but not including fishes. Topics covered include the following: scope and process; existing and affected environment, including specific discussion of 18 projects in the Columbia river basin. Analysis, evaluation, and alternatives are presented for all projects. System wide impacts to wildlife are also included.

  14. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix O: Economic and Social Impact.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    This Appendix O of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Columbia River System measures the economic and social effects of the alternative system operation strategies and includes both geographic and methodology components. Areas discussed in detail include the following: purpose, scope and process; an economic history of the Columbia River Basin and its use today including the Columbia River and Socio-economic development in the Northwest and Major uses of the River System; Analysis procedures and methodologies including national economic evaluation, the concepts, analysis of assumptions, analysis for specific river uses, water quality, Regional evaluation, analysis, and social impacts; alternatives and impacts including implementation costs, andromous fish, resident fish and wildlife, flood control, irrigation and municipal and industrial water supply, navigation impacts, power, recreation, annual costs, regional economic analysis. Extensive comparison of alternatives is included.

  15. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    HANFORD SITE GROUNDWATER NUMBERS billion gallons of contaminated groundwater treated tons of contaminants removed in all pump and treat systems since the facilities began operating 13.95 239 tons of contaminants removed in 2015 84 2.4 billion gallons of groundwater treated in 2015 3 Groundwater Key Focus Areas * Expand pump-and-treat systems - Continue pump-and-treat operations - Install and connect new and existing wells to maximize remediation effectiveness - Operate uranium treatment system *

  16. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    to reduce risk. Most recently, Ms. Marks served as the Vice President of Assurance and Operational Excellence with Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Group. In this role, she...

  17. EM Richland Operations Office Manager Reflects on River Corridor...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the F Reactor Area during plutonium production operations, and the larger image shows an ... Office (RL), responsible for management and oversight of cleanup of the ...

  18. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - CENTERRA-SRS

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Organizations / CENTERRA-SRS CENTERRA-SRS CENTERRA SRS Centerra-SRS, a subsidiary of Centerra Group, LLC, is contracted by the U.S. Department of Energy's Savannah River Operations Office to provide security support services for the 310-square-mile Savannah River Site (SRS), a critical Government nuclear facility. The initial contract went into effect on August 23, 1983. Centerra-SRS is a paramilitary organization that provides total security services, including access control, property

  19. EIS-0108: L-Reactor Operation, Savannah River Plant, Aiken, South Carolina

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared to provide environmental input into the proposed decision to restart L-Reactor operation at the Savannah River Plant (SRP). The Savannah River Plant is a major U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) installation for the production of defense nuclear materials. The proposed restart of L–Reactor would provide defense nuclear materials (i.e. , plutonium) to wet current and near-term needs for national defense purposes.

  20. SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE AIKEN, SC 29808 NEWS...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (803) 952-8564 Thursday, May 12, 2016 sonya.goines@srs.gov Dean Campbell, SRR (803) 208-8270 dean.campbell@srs.gov SRS Celebrates 20 years of Vitrification Facility Operations ...

  1. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Doug Shoop, Deputy Manager, Department of Energy Richland Operations Office February 2015 2 Budget Richland Operations Office FY 2015 Funding Marks by Control Point PBS PBS Title FY 2014 Omnibus (Enacted) FY 2015 President's Budget FY 2015 Omnibus Allocation FY 2016 President's Budget RL-0011 NM Stabilization and Disposition - PFP 142,670 168,228 137,130 148,661 RL-0012 SNF Stabilization and Disposition 98,369 76,777 67,746 81,192 RL-0012 15-D-401 Containerized Sludge Line Item 26,290 46,055

  2. Supplement Number 1 to Operating Plan of Mirnat Potomac River, LLC in

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 | Department of Energy 1 to Operating Plan of Mirnat Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Supplement Number 1 to Operating Plan of Mirnat Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, 16 USC §824a(c), Section 301 (b) of the Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 USC §7151 (b), and Order No. 202-05-3, issued by the Department of Energy

  3. Supplement Number 5 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 | Department of Energy 5 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Supplement Number 5 to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC in Compliance with Order No. 202-05-03 Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, 16 USC §824a(c), Section 301(b) of the Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 USC §7151(b), and Order No. 202-05-3, issued by the Department of Energy

  4. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Overview * Introduction and Meeting Purpose * History and Regulatory Background * Permitting Background * Proposed Permit Modification Request * Proposed Changes - Final Status Operations * Proposed Changes - Closure * Class 3 Permit Modification Process * Conclusion * Questions 3 Introduction and Meeting Purpose * Presented by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): - Duane Carter Environmental Safety and Quality Division - Mike Collins Waste Management and D&D Division * Purpose: - Provide

  5. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - Contacts

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Natural Gas Storage Report Types of Possible Survey Errors in Estimates Published in the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Release date: March 1, 2016 The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects and publishes natural gas storage information on a monthly and weekly basis. The Form EIA-191, Monthly Underground Natural Gas Storage Report, is a census survey that collects field-level information from all underground natural gas storage operators in the United States known to EIA.

  6. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Tom Teynor, Department of Energy Richland Operations Office March 2015 2 Progress Update - March 2015 Original Remaining Processing Equipment (e.g., glove boxes) Removed or Ready for Removal during Demolition 238 23 Pencil Tank Sections Removed 196 23 Plutonium Finishing Plant Overall Progress To Date Progress Through Jan. 31: * 90 percent large pieces of processing equipment (e.g., glove boxes, laboratory vent hoods) removed * 88 percent pencil tank sections removed * 63 of 81 facilities

  7. Cleaning Up the Hanford River Corridor and Improving Site Operations

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE Richland Operations Office June 2012 2 2012 HAB Membership Package * HAB Membership package is under review at DOE-HQ - 16 members and 22 alternatives are up for reappointment or appointment (8 new appointments) * Appointment letters will not be issued by June 8, 2012 - DOE is seeking approval for limited travel reimbursement to support July committee meetings. 3 Membership Diversity (November 2011 HAB Meeting) * DOE policy calls for ethnic and gender diversity in Environmental Management

  8. Daily/Hourly Hydrosystem Operation : How the Columbia River System Responds to Short-Term Needs.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1994-02-01

    The System Operation Review, being conducted by the Bonneville Power Administration, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and the US Bureau of Reclamation, is analyzing current and potential future operations of the Columbia River System. One goal of the System Operations Review is to develop a new System Operation Strategy. The strategy will be designed to balance the many regionally and nationally important uses of the Columbia River system. Short-term operations address the dynamics that affect the Northwest hydro system and its multiple uses. Demands for electrical power and natural streamflows change constantly and thus are not precisely predictable. Other uses of the hydro system have constantly changing needs, too, many of which can interfere with other uses. Project operators must address various river needs, physical limitations, weather, and streamflow conditions while maintaining the stability of the electric system and keeping your lights on. It takes staffing around the clock to manage the hour-to-hour changes that occur and the challenges that face project operators all the time.

  9. CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Conduct of Operations program at the Office of River Protection, K Basin Sludge Waste System.

  10. Walla Walla River Fish Passage Operations Project : Annual Progress Report October 2007 - September 2008.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bronson, James P.; Duke, Bill; Loffink, Ken

    2008-12-30

    In the late 1990s, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, along with many other agencies, began implementing fisheries restoration activities in the Walla Walla Basin. An integral part of these efforts is to alleviate the inadequate fish migration conditions in the basin. Migration concerns are being addressed by removing diversion structures, constructing fish passage facilities, implementing minimum instream flow requirements, and providing trap and haul efforts when needed. The objective of the Walla Walla River Fish Passage Operations Project is to increase the survival of migrating adult and juvenile salmonids in the Walla Walla River basin. The project is responsible for coordinating operation and maintenance of ladders, screen sites, bypasses, trap facilities, and transportation equipment. In addition, the project provides technical input on passage and trapping facility design, operation, and criteria. Operation of the various passage facilities and passage criteria guidelines are outlined in an annual operations plan that the project develops. Beginning in March of 2007, two work elements from the Walla Walla Fish Passage Operations Project were transferred to other projects. The work element Enumeration of Adult Migration at Nursery Bridge Dam is now conducted under the Walla Walla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Project and the work element Provide Transportation Assistance is conducted under the Umatilla Satellite Facilities Operation and Maintenance Project. Details of these activities can be found in those project's respective annual reports.

  11. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Main Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review; United States. Bonneville Power Administration; United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. North Pacific Division; United States. Bureau of Reclamation. Pacific Northwest Region.

    1995-11-01

    The System Operation Review (SOR) Final EIS addresses four actions: (a) need to develop coordinated strategy for managing the multiple uses of the Federal Columbia River system (System Operating Strategy [SOS]); (b) need to provide interested parties other than management agencies with a long-term role in system planning (Forum); (c) need to renew or change current Canadian Entitlement Allocation Agreements (CEAA); and (d) need to renegotiate and renew the Pacific Northwest Coordination Agreement (PNCA). SOS alternatives analyzed are: (1) operation prior to Endangered Species Act listings of salmon stocks; (2) current operations (no action); (3) stable storage project operation; (4) natural river operation; (5) fixed drawdown; (6) operating strategies proposed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, State fisheries agencies, Native American tribes, and Federal operating agencies; and (7) Preferred Alternative. The seven Forum alternatives analyzed are: (1) decisionmaking by the SOR lead agencies (preferred alternative); (2) decisionmaking by SOR lead agencies and recommendations by an existing regional entity; (3) decisionmaking by SOR lead agencies and recommendations by a new regional entity; (4) decisionmaking by a Federal consultation forum; (5) decisionmaking by a new entity; (6) decisionmaking by one Federal operating agency; (7) decisionmaking by a Federal agency other than an operating agency. PNCA alternatives analyzed are: (1) no replacement contract; (2) contract to maximize regional power benefits; (3) roll over existing PNCA; (4) current PNCA with modified operating procedures (preferred alternative); (5) current PNCA with nonpower modifications. CEAA alternatives include: (1) no action (no replacement of current allocation agreements); (2) entitlement allocation: 55 percent Federal; 45 percent non-Federal; (3) entitlement allocation: 70 percent Federal, 30 percent non-Federal (preferred alternative); (4) no agreement.

  12. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix R: Pacific Northwest Coordination agreement (PNCA).

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    Currently, the Federal government coordinates the planning and operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) with projects owned and operated by the region`s non-Federal hydrogenerating utilities pursuant to the Pacific North-west Coordination Agreement (PNCA). The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), the Corps of Engineers (Corps), and the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) are parties to the PNCA on behalf of the government of the United States. The PNCA is a complex agreement that provides an opportunity for the region`s power producers to maximize the power system`s reliability and economy while meeting their multiple-use objectives. The PNCA does not dictate the operation of the resources it coordinates. It is essentially an accounting mechanism that exchanges the power produced among the parties in order to improve the reliability of the system and reduce regional power costs. Project owners retain complete autonomy to operate as needed to meet their multiple-use requirements. The PNCA was executed in 1964 as an important component of regional plans to maximize the Northwest`s hydro resource capability. Maximization also included the development of storage projects on the Columbia River in Canada pursuant to the terms of the 1964 Columbia River Treaty. Because of the link between power coordination and Treaty issues, the current parties to the PNCA, currently are contemplating entering into a replacement or renewed power coordination agreement. Because the power coordination agreement is a consensual arrangement, its ultimate provisions must be acceptable to all of its signatories. This Appendix R to the Final Environmental Impact Statement of the Columbia River System is a presentation of the Pacific North-west Coordination Agreement.

  13. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Main Report Exhibits.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    This Volume is a part of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Columbia River System. This volume contains technical exhibits of cultural resources and commentary on the (System Operation Review) SOR process. The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation comment is the majority of the material in the volume, in the Consultation Plan, Identification of trust resources; Criteria for the selection of a System Operating Strategy; comment on rights protection and implementation of Federal Trust responsibility; analysis of the draft EIS. Comment by other Native American Tribes and groups is also included: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Spokane Tribe of Indians; Coeur d` Alene tribe.

  14. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - Events of

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Public Interest Events of Public Interest Events of Public Interest April 2014 April 17 All Day Public Town Hall Meeting, SRS Missions and Funding Adobe Acrobat PDF April 22 4:30 PM - 6:20 PM SRS CAB Committee Meeting: Strategic & Legacy Management April 22 6:30 PM - 8:20 PM SRS CAB Committee Meeting: Facilities Disposition & Site Remediation DOE Seal U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office P. O. Box A Aiken, SC 29802 (803) 952-7697 Site Operator: (803) 725-6211

  15. Sluiceway Operations to Pass Juvenile Salmonids at The Dalles Dam, Columbia River, USA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Johnson, Gary E.; Khan, Fenton; Skalski, J. R.; Klatte, Bernard A.

    2013-11-20

    Existing ice and trash sluiceways are commonly used to pass juvenile salmonids downstream at hydropower dams through a benign, non-turbine route. At The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River, managers undertook optimizing operations of sluiceway weirs to maximize survival of juvenile salmonids at the powerhouse. We applied fixed-location hydroacoustic methods to compare fish passage rates and sluiceway efficiencies for two weir configurations during 2004 and 2005: three weirs versus six weirs, located at the mid- versus east powerhouse, respectively. We also analyzed horizontal distributions of passage at the sluiceway and turbines and the effects of operating turbines beneath open sluiceway gates to provide supporting data relevant to operations optimization. Based on the findings, we recommend the following for long-term operations for the sluiceway at The Dalles Dam: open six rather than three sluiceway weirs to take advantage of the maximum hydraulic capacity of the sluiceway; open the three weirs above the western-most operating main turbine unit (MU) and the three weirs at MU 8 where turbine passage rates are relatively high; operate the turbine units below open sluiceway weirs as a standard procedure; operate the sluiceway 24 h/d year-round to maximize its benefits to juvenile salmonids; and use the same operations for spring and summer emigrants. These operational concepts are transferable to dams where sluiceway surface flow outlets are used protect downstream migrating fishes.

  16. Kootenai River Floodplain Ecosystem Operational Loss Assessment, Protection, Mitigation and Rehabilitation, 2007-2008 Annual Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Merz, Norm

    2009-02-18

    The overarching goals of the 'Kootenai River Floodplain Ecosystem Operational Loss Assessment, Protection, Mitigation and Rehabilitation' Project (BPA Project No.2002-011-00) are to: (1) assess abiotic and biotic factors (i.e., geomorphologic, hydrological, aquatic and riparian/floodplain communities) in determining a definitive composition of ecological integrity, (2) develop strategies to assess and mitigate losses of ecosystem functions, and (3) produce a regional operational loss assessment framework. To produce a scientifically defensible, repeatable, and complete assessment tool, KTOI assembled a team of top scientists in the fields of hydrology, hydraulics, ornithology, entomology, statistics, and river ecology, among other expertise. This advisory team is known as the Research Design and Review Team (RDRT). The RDRT scientists drive the review, selection, and adaptive management of the research designs to evaluate the ecologic functions lost due to the operation of federal hydropower facilities. The unique nature of this project (scientific team, newest/best science, adaptive management, assessment of ecological functions, etc.) has been to work in a dynamic RDRT process. In addition to being multidisciplinary, this model KTOI project provides a stark contrast to the sometimes inflexible process (review, re-review, budgets, etc.) of the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. The project RDRT is assembled annually, with subgroups meeting as needed throughout the year to address project issues, analyses, review, and interpretation. Activities of RDRT coordinated and directed the selection of research and assessment methodologies appropriate for the Kootenai River Watershed and potential for regional application in the Columbia River Basin. The entire RDRT continues to meet annually to update and discuss project progress. RDRT Subcontractors work in smaller groups throughout the year to meet project objectives. Determining the extent to which

  17. Reservoir release patterns for hydropower operations at the Aspinall Unit on the Gunnison River, Colorado

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yin, S.C.L.; McCoy, J.J.; Sedlacek, J.

    1995-05-01

    This report presents the development of reservoir release patterns for the Aspinall Unit, which includes Blue Mesa, Morrow Point, and Crystal Reservoirs on the Gunnison River in Colorado. Release patterns were assessed for two hydropower operational scenarios--seasonally adjusted steady flows and seasonally adjusted high fluctuating flows--and three representative hydrologic years--moderate (1987), dry (1989), and wet (1983). The release patterns for the operational scenarios were developed with the aid of monthly, daily, and hourly reservoir operational models, which simulate the linked operation of the three Aspinall Unit reservoirs. Also presented are reservoir fluctuations and downstream water surface elevations corresponding to the reservoir release patterns. Both of the hydropower operational scenarios evaluated are based on the ecological research flows proposed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service for the Aspinall Unit. The first operational scenario allows only seasonally adjusted steady flows (no hourly fluctuations at any dam within one day), whereas the second scenario permits high fluctuating flows from Blue Mesa and Morrow Point Reservoirs during certain times of the year. Crystal Reservoir would release a steady flow within each day under both operational scenarios.

  18. Recommendations for Advanced Design Mixer Pump Operation in Savannah River Site Tank 18F

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Enderlin, Carl W.; Terrones, Guillermo; Bates, Cameron J.; Hatchell, Brian K.; Adkins, Brannen

    2003-10-30

    This report discusses technical issues and presents recommendations for operating the advanced design mixer pump (ADMP) in Tank 18 at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Also presented are the results obtained from simulated scaled pump-down tests carried out in the 1/4-scale double shell tank (DST) test facility at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The work was conducted for the DOE Tanks Focus Area (TFA) by the Retrieval Process Development and Enhancement (RPD&E) program. The ability of the Tank 18 retrieval system to mobilize the solid waste and transport it through the retrieval pump, efficiently removing the solids from the tank, are evaluated.

  19. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - DOE-SR News

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Releases Releases DOE-SR News Releases DOE-SR Exercises Option on Management and Operating Contract SR-2016-08-04 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE Releases Final Request for Proposal for Savannah River Site Liquid Waste Services SR-2016-06-30 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE HOLDS RIBBON CUTTING FOR NEW SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY SR-2016-06-21 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE DECLARES CONSTRUCTION OF SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY COMPLETE SR-2016-06 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE Releases Draft Request for Proposal and

  20. Radionuclide releases to the Columbia River from Hanford Operations, 1944--1971. Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Heeb, C.M.; Bates, D.J.

    1994-01-01

    The purpose of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project is to estimate the radiation dose that individuals could have received as a result of radionuclide emissions since 1944 from the Hanford Site. One source of radionuclide releases to the Columbia River was from production reactor operations. This report provides a quantitative estimate of the amount of radioactivity released each month (1944--1971) to the Columbia River from eleven radionuclides as well as from gross beta activity.

  1. Radionuclide releases to the Columbia River from Hanford Operations, 1944--1971. Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Heeb, C.M.; Bates, D.J.

    1994-05-01

    The purpose of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project is to estimate the radiation dose that individuals could have received as a result of radionuclide emissions since 1944 from the Hanford Site. One source of radionuclide releases to the Columbia River was from production reactor operations. This report provides a quantitative estimate of the amount of radioactivity released each month (1944--1971) to the Columbia River from eleven radionuclides as well as from gross beta activity.

  2. Safety analysis -- 200 Area Savannah River Plant, F-Canyon Operations. Supplement 4

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Beary, M.M.; Collier, C.D.; Fairobent, L.A.; Graham, R.F.; Mason, C.L.; McDuffee, W.T.; Owen, T.L.; Walker, D.H.

    1986-02-01

    The F-Canyon facility is located in the 200 Separations Area and uses the Purex process to recover plutonium from reactor-irradiated uranium. The irradiated uranium is normally in the form of solid or hollow cylinders called slugs. These slugs are encased in aluminum cladding and are sent to the F-Canyon from the Savannah River Plant (SRP) reactor areas or from the Receiving Basin for Offsite Fuels (RBOF). This Safety Analysis Report (SAR) documents an analysis of the F-Canyon operations and is an update to a section of a previous SAR. The previous SAR documented an analysis of the entire 200 Separations Area operations. This SAR documents an analysis of the F-Canyon and is one of a series of documents for the Separations Area as specified in the Savannah River Implementation Plans. A substantial amount of the information supporting the conclusions of this SAR is found in the Systems Analysis. Some F-Canyon equipment has been updated during the time between the Systems Analysis and this SAR and a complete description of this equipment is included in this report. The primary purpose of the analysis was to demonstrate that the F-Canyon can be operated without undue risk to onsite or offsite populations and to the environment. In this report, risk is defined as the expected frequency of an accident, multiplied by the resulting radiological consequence in person-rem. The units of risk for radiological dose are person-rem/year. Maximum individual exposure values have also been calculated and reported.

  3. Qualitative assessment of the impacts of proposed system operating strategies to resident fish within selected Columbia River Reservoirs

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Shreffler, D.K.; Geist, D.R.; Mavros, W.V.

    1994-01-01

    The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), and US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) are presently conducting the System Operation Review (SOR) for the Columbia River basin. The SOR began in 1990 and is expected to provide an operating strategy that will take into consideration multiple uses of the Columbia River system including navigation, flood control, irrigation, power generation, fish migration, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation, water supply, and water quality. This report provides descriptions of each of the non-modeled reservoirs and other specified river reaches. The descriptions focus on the distinct management goals for resident fish: biodiversity, species-specific concerns, and sport fisheries. In addition, this report provides a qualitative assessment of impacts to the resident fish within these reservoirs and river reaches from the 7 alternative system operating strategies. In addition to this introduction, the report contains four more sections. Section 2.0 provides the methods that were used. Reservoir descriptions appear in Section 3.0, which is a synthesis of our literature review and interviews with resident fish experts. Section 4.0 contains a discussion of potential impacts to fish within each of these reservoirs and river reaches from the 7 proposed system operating strategies. The references cited are listed in Section 5.0.

  4. OPERATIONS REVIEW OF THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE INTEGRATED SALT DISPOSITION PROCESS - 11327

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Peters, T.; Poirier, M.; Fondeur, F.; Fink, S.; Brown, S.; Geeting, M.

    2011-02-07

    The Savannah River Site (SRS) is removing liquid radioactive waste from its Tank Farm. To treat waste streams that are low in Cs-137, Sr-90, and actinides, SRS developed the Actinide Removal Process and implemented the Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) Unit (MCU). The Actinide Removal Process contacts salt solution with monosodium titanate to sorb strontium and select actinides. After monosodium titanate contact, the resulting slurry is filtered to remove the monosodium titanate (and sorbed strontium and actinides) and entrained sludge. The filtrate is transferred to the MCU for further treatment to remove cesium. The solid particulates removed by the filter are concentrated to {approx} 5 wt %, washed to reduce the sodium concentration, and transferred to the Defense Waste Processing Facility for vitrification. The CSSX process extracts the cesium from the radioactive waste using a customized solvent to produce a Decontaminated Salt Solution (DSS), and strips and concentrates the cesium from the solvent with dilute nitric acid. The DSS is incorporated in grout while the strip acid solution is transferred to the Defense Waste Processing Facility for vitrification. The facilities began radiological processing in April 2008 and started processing of the third campaign ('MarcoBatch 3') of waste in June 2010. Campaigns to date have processed {approx}1.2 million gallons of dissolved saltcake. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) personnel performed tests using actual radioactive samples for each waste batch prior to processing. Testing included monosodium titanate sorption of strontium and actinides followed by CSSX batch contact tests to verify expected cesium mass transfer. This paper describes the tests conducted and compares results from facility operations. The results include strontium, plutonium, and cesium removal, cesium concentration, and organic entrainment and recovery data. Additionally, the poster describes lessons learned during operation

  5. Sluiceway Operations for Adult Steelhead Downstream Passage at The Dalles Dam, Columbia River, USA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Khan, Fenton; Royer, Ida M.; Johnson, Gary E.; Tackley, Sean C.

    2013-10-01

    This study evaluated adult steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss; fallbacks and kelts) downstream passage at The Dalles Dam in the Columbia River, USA, during the late fall, winter, and early spring months between 2008 and 2011. The purpose of the study was to determine the efficacy of operating the dam’s ice-and-trash sluiceway during non-spill months to provide a relatively safe, non-turbine, surface outlet for overwintering steelhead fallbacks and downstream migrating steelhead kelts. We applied the fixed-location hydroacoustic technique to estimate fish passage rates at the sluiceway and turbines of the dam. The spillway was closed during our sampling periods, which generally occurred in late fall, winter, and early spring. The sluiceway was highly used by adult steelhead (91–99% of total fish sampled passing the dam) during all sampling periods. Turbine passage was low when the sluiceway was not operated. This implies that lack of a sluiceway route did not result in increased turbine passage. However, when the sluiceway was open, adult steelhead used it to pass through the dam. The sluiceway may be operated during late fall, winter, and early spring to provide an optimal, non-turbine route for adult steelhead (fallbacks and kelts) downstream passage at The Dalles Dam.

  6. EIS-0147: Continued Operation of the K, L, and P Reactors, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This environmental impact statement (EIS) analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed action, which is to continue operation of the K, L, and P Reactors at the Savannah River Site (SRS) to ensure the capability to produce nuclear materials, and to produce nuclear materials as necessary for United States defense and nondefense programs.

  7. CX-009685: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions & Advanced Technologies & Laboratories International- Proposed Actions - Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  8. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix T (Second Continued Volume): Comments & Responses.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    This is Appendix T (second continued volume) giving public comments and responses to the final environmental impact statement for the Columbia River System.

  9. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - DOE-SR News

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Release Archive Release Archive DOE-SR News Release Archive 2012 News Releases Savannah River Site Reaches Significant Milestone with Waste Tank Closure SR-2012-06 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE to Extend Savannah River Nuclear Solutions Contract at Savannah River Site to September 2016 SR-2012-05 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Federal Employees Volunteer for United Way Campaign SR-2012-04 Adobe Acrobat PDF Installation of Six Large Process Tanks Mark Big Step in Construction of Critical Waste

  10. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix J: Recreation.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    This Appendix J of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Columbia River System discusses impacts on the recreational activities in the region. Major sections include the following: scope and processes; recreation in the Columbia River Basin today - by type, location, participation, user characteristics, factors which affect usage, and managing agencies; recreation analysis procedures and methodology; and alternatives and their impacts.

  11. U.S. Department of Energy electric and hybrid vehicle Site Operator Program at Platte River Power Authority. Final report, July 3, 1991--August 31, 1996

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Emmert, R.A.

    1996-12-31

    The Platte River Power Authority (Platte River) is a political subdivision of the state of Colorado, owned by the four municipalities of Fort Collins, Loveland, Longmont and Estes Park, Colorado. Platte River is a non-profit, publicly owned, joint-action agency formed to construct, operate and maintain generating plants, transmission systems and related facilities for the purpose of delivering to the four municipalities electric energy for distribution and resale. Platte River, as a participant in the US Department of Energy (DOE) Site Operator Program, worked to accomplish the Site Operator Program goals and objectives to field test and evaluate electric and electric-hybrid vehicles and electric vehicle systems in a real world application/environment. This report presents results of Platte River`s program (Program) during the five-years Platte River participated in the DOE Site Operator Program. Platte River participated in DOE Site Operator Program from July 3, 1991 through August 31, 1996. During its Program, Platte River conducted vehicle tests and evaluations, and electric vehicle demonstrations in the Front Range region of Northern Colorado. Platte River also investigated electric vehicle infrastructure issues and tested infrastructure components. Platte River`s Program objectives were as follows: evaluate the year round performance, operational costs, reliability, and life cycle costs of electric vehicles in the Front Range region of Northern Colorado; evaluate an electric vehicle`s usability and acceptability as a pool vehicle; test any design improvements or technological improvements on a component level that may be made available to PRPA and which can be retrofit into vehicles; and develop, test and evaluate, and demonstrate components to be used in charging electric vehicles.

  12. CX-007975: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions and Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International- Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  13. CX-007977: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.6 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  14. CX-007976: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  15. CX-007983: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  16. CX-007979: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  17. CX-007981: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  18. CX-007982: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  19. CX-007974: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  20. CX-007980: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar Year 2012 Scheduled To Take Place CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  1. CX-009677: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Facilities for Storing Packaged Hazardous Waste for 90 Days or Less CX(s) Applied: B6.4 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  2. Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box A Aiken. South Carolina 29802

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Aiken. South Carolina 29802 DEC 1 J 2011 Mr. Dwayne Wilson, President & CEO Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC Savannah River Site Building 730-1 B, Room 333 Aiken, SC 29808 Dear Mr. Wilson: SUBJECT: Final Fee Determination for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Base Work Performance Period The purpose of this letter is to inform you of my determination of performance fee to be awarded to Savannah River Nuclear Solutions. LLC (SRNS) for FY20 t 1, in accordance with Contract No. DE-AC09-08SR22470,

  3. Centerra Earns High Performance Rating for Savannah River Site Security Operations

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    AIKEN, S.C. – The Savannah River Site (SRS) security contractor Centerra received high performance ratings from DOE in fiscal year 2015, earning $5,280,546 of the available $5,739,724 fee.

  4. Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box A Aiken, South Carolina 29802

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Aiken, South Carolina 29802 BUSINESS SENSITIVE OEC 1 0 tuu9 Mr. Garry Flowen, President &. CEO Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC Building 730- I a, Room 333 Aiken. SC 29808 Dear Mr. Flowers: SUBJECT: Final Fee Determination for Fiscal Year 2009 Base Work Performance Period The purpose of this letter is to inform you of my determination of the amount of performance fee to be awarded to Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009. in accordance with Contract No.

  5. Effects of Flaming Gorge Dam hydropower operations on flow and stage in the Green River, Utah and Colorado

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yin, S.C.L.; Cho, H.E.; McCoy, J.J.; Palmer, S.C.

    1995-05-01

    This report presents the development of Flaming Gorge Reservoir release patterns and resulting downstream flows and stages for four potential hydropower operational scenarios. The release patterns were developed for three representative hydrologic years: moderate, dry, and wet. Computer models were used to estimate flows and stages in the Green River resulting from these release patterns for the moderate water year. The four hydropower operational scenarios for Flaming Gorge Dam were year-round high fluctuating flows, seasonally adjusted high fluctuating flows, seasonally adjusted moderate fluctuating flows, and seasonally adjusted steady flows. The year-round high fluctuating flow scenario assumes that the monthly total reservoir releases would be the same as historical releases. The remaining seasonally adjusted flow scenarios would comply with the 1992 Biological Opinion of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, which requires high flows in the spring and limited hourly fluctuations, especially in summer and autumn releases, to protect endangered fish. Within one year, the maximum daily river stage fluctuations resulting from hydropower operations under the seasonally adjusted high fluctuating flow scenario would be similar to the maximum daily fluctuations under the year-round high fluctuating flow scenario. However, reduced or no fluctuations would occur in some time periods under the former scenario. The maximum daily river stage fluctuations under the seasonally adjusted moderate fluctuating flow scenario would be about half of those under the seasonally adjusted high fluctuating flow scenario.

  6. The effects of interim flow operations from Glen Canyon Dam on Colorado River sand bars in the Grand Canyon, Arizona

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kaplinski, M.A.; Hazel, J.E.; Beus, S.S. . Geology Dept.); Stevens, L.E. . NPS Cooperative Parks Studies Unit); Mayes, H.B. )

    1993-04-01

    Discharges from Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) affect the geomorphology and stability of downstream alluvial sediment deposits. To protect downstream resources, the US DOI mandated interim flow criteria (IFC) on 1 August, 1991. The IFC consist of reduced daily fluctuations (226--566 m[sup 3]/s) and reduced ramping rates (42.5--57 m[sup 3]/s/hr), the primary objective of which is to maintain sediment storage in the river system by minimizing sediment transport. This study was initiated to determine the effectiveness of the IFC in achieving this objective. The authors examined whether reduced daily fluctuations lead to subaerial sand bar erosion and increased subaqueous sediment storage. They collected and analyzed topographic and bathymetric survey data from sand bars throughout the Colorado River corridor in Sept/Oct, 1991 and in Oct/Nov, 1992 to compare changes in sand bar morphology. They examined changing topography due to GCD operation in what they termed the hydrologically active zone (HAZ), that portion of the sand bar exposed to daily dam operations (142--900 m[sup 3]/s stage elevations). Volumes within the HAZ and profiles across this zone were generated from these sediment deposits. Their preliminary results show that, in general, erosion of sediment at higher bar elevations was coincident with deposition along lower parts of the bar platform. The observed response to IFC elevation in order to maintain sediment deposits for Colorado River corridor bio-diversity (e.g., fisheries habitats). 88% of sand bars that showed significant volume gain were preceded by significant volume loss, implying that antecedent conditions are an important factor in sand bar response to GCD operations. Sediment transport capacity was reduced as evidenced by increased sediment storage in recirculation zones and sediment infilling of eddy return channels. The authors conclude that IFC are achieving their primary objective of maintaining sediment storage within the river corridor.

  7. U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - DOE-SR News

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Releases Savannah River Site Liquid Waste System Plans Archive Savannah River Site Liquid Waste System Plans Archive SRR-LWP-2009-00001 R-19 (May 2014) Adobe Acrobat PDF SRR-LWP-2009-00001 R-18 (June 2013) Adobe Acrobat PDF SRR-LWP-2009-00001 R-17 (February 2012) Adobe Acrobat PDF SRR-LWP-2009-00001 R-16 (December 2010) Adobe Acrobat PDF SRR-LWP-2009-00001 R-15 (January 2010) Adobe Acrobat PDF LWO-PIT-2007-00062 R-14.1 (October 2007) Adobe Acrobat PDF HLW-2002-00025 R-13 (March 2002) Adobe

  8. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General report on inspection of Westinghouse Savannah River Company fees for managing and operating the Savannah River Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-08-03

    During the first five years of its contract with the Department of Energy, Westinghouse Savannah River Company was paid over $130 million in fees to manage and operate the Savannah River Site. Fees paid to Westinghouse steadily increased over the five year period. For example, fees paid for the last six months of this five year period were over three times as large as fees paid for the first six months. The purpose of this inspection was to review the Department`s annual negotiation of total available fees with Westinghouse, and to examine the reasons for the growth in fees over this five year period. The review disclosed that, after Fiscal Year 1989, the Department used an increasing number of fee bases in calculating Westinghouse Savannah River Company`s fixed-fee-equivalents from the maximum fee schedules within the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation. The authors found that the Department had significantly increased the percentage of the dollar value of subcontracts being placed in Westinghouse`s fee bases for fee calculation purposes. They found that the Department had effectively increased Westinghouse`s fixed-fee-equivalents by approximately $3 million in both Fiscal Year 1993 and 1994 to, in large part, fund an unallowable employee incentive compensation program. They found that Westinghouse`s total paid fees for the five year period increased significantly over what they would have been had the terms resulting from the original competitive negotiations been maintained. The authors recommended that the Deputy Assist Secretary for Procurement and Assistance Management require that changes in either the number or composition of fee bases used in calculating fees from the maximum fee schedules be submitted to the Department`s Procurement Executive for approval.

  9. Savannah River Site’s Liquid Waste Operations Adds Multi-Functional Laboratory

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    AIKEN, S.C. – A new multi-functional laboratory supporting high-level waste processing at the Savannah River Site (SRS) gives workers a new and improved place to provide back-up laboratory support and more space for chemical storage.

  10. CX-011595: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B3.6 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  11. CX-006838: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Acquisition, Installation, Operation, and Removal of Communication Systems, Data Processing Equipment, and Similar Electronic Equipment on the Hanford Site, Richland, WashingtonCX(s) Applied: B1.7Date: 08/29/2011Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  12. CX-011222: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Siting, Construction, and Operation of New Septic Tank, Drain Field and Fencing at the 400 Area Fast Flux Test Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 10/28/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  13. CX-009220: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Siting, Construction, and Operation of Support Buildings and Support Structures CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 10/04/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  14. CX-009658: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  15. Environmental assessment for the construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Waste Segregation Facility at the Savannah River Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-01-01

    This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared by the Department of Energy (DOE) to assess the potential environmental impacts associated with the construction, operation and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the Waste Segregation Facility (WSF) for the sorting, shredding, and compaction of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) located near Aiken, South Carolina. The LLW to be processed consists of two waste streams: legacy waste which is currently stored in E-Area Vaults of SRS and new waste generated from continuing operations. The proposed action is to construct, operate, and D&D a facility to process low-activity job-control and equipment waste for volume reduction. The LLW would be processed to make more efficient use of low-level waste disposal capacity (E-Area Vaults) or to meet the waste acceptance criteria for treatment at the Consolidated Incineration Facility (CIF) at SRS.

  16. Remedial investigation/feasibility study for the Clinch River/Poplar Creek operable unit. Volume 4. Appendix F

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    This section contains ecotoxicological profiles for the COPECs for the combined Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Report for the Clinch River/Poplar Crack (CR/PC) Operable Unit (OU). The ecotoxicological information is presented for only those endpoints for which the chemicals are COPECs. The CR/PC OU is located in Anderson and Roane Counties, Tennessee and consists of the Clinch River and several of its embayments in Melton Hill and Watts Bar Reservoirs. These waters have received hazardous substances released over a period of 50 years from the US Department of Energy`s Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), a National Priority List site established under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. A remedial investigation has been conducted to determine the current nature and extent of any contamination and to assess the resulting risk to human health and the environment. The feasibility study evaluates remedial action alternatives to identify any that are feasible for implementation and that would effectively reduce risk. Historical studies had indicated that current problems would likely include {sup 137}Cs in sediment of the Clinch River, mercury in sediment and fish of Poplar Creek and PCBs and pesticides in fish from throughout the OU. Peak releases of mercury and {sup 137}Cs occurred over 35 years ago, and current releases are low. Past releases of PCBs from the ORR are poorly quantified, and current releases are difficult to quantify because levels are so low. The site characterization focused on contaminants in surface water, sediment, and biota. Contaminants in surface water were all found to be below Ambient Water Quality Criteria. Other findings included the following: elevated metals including cesium 137 and mercury in McCoy Branch sediments; PCBs and chlordane elevated in several fish species, presenting the only major human health risk, significant ecological risks in Poplar Creek but not in the Clinch River.

  17. Remedial investigation/feasibility study for the Clinch River/Poplar Creek operable unit. Volume 1. Main text

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    This is the combined Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Report for the Clinch River/Poplar Crack (CR/PC) Operable Unit (OU). The CR/PC OU is located in Anderson and Roane Counties, Tennessee and consists of the Clinch River and several of its embayments in Melton Hill and Watts Bar Reservoirs. These waters have received hazardous substances released over a period of 50 years from the US Department of Energy`s Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), a National Priority List site established under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. A remedial investigation has been conducted to determine the current nature and extent of any contamination and to assess the resulting risk to human health and the environment. The feasibility study evaluates remedial action alternatives to identify any that are feasible for implementation and that would effectively reduce risk. Historical studies had indicated that current problems would likely include {sup 137}Cs in sediment of the Clinch River, mercury in sediment and fish of Poplar Creek and PCBs and pesticides in fish from throughout the OU. Peak releases of mercury and {sup 137}Cs occurred over 35 years ago, and current releases are low. Past releases of PCBs from the ORR are poorly quantified, and current releases are difficult to quantify because levels are so low. The site characterization focused on contaminants in surface water, sediment, and biota. Contaminants in surface water were all found to be below Ambient Water Quality Criteria. Other findings included the following: elevated metals including cesium 137 and mercury in McCoy Branch sediments; PCBs and chlordane elevated in several fish species, presenting the only major human health risk, significant ecological risks in Poplar Creek but not in the Clinch River.

  18. Remedial investigation/feasibility study for the Clinch River/Poplar Creek operable unit. Volume 3. Appendix E

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-09-01

    This document contains Appendix E: Toxicity Information and Uncertainty Analysis, description of methods, from the combined Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Report for the Clinch River/Poplar Crack (CR/PC) Operable Unit (OU). The CR/PC OU is located in Anderson and Roane Counties, Tennessee and consists of the Clinch River and several of its embayments in Melton Hill and Watts Bar Reservoirs. These waters have received hazardous substances released over a period of 50 years from the US Department of Energy`s Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), a National Priority List site established under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. A remedial investigation has been conducted to determine the current nature and extent of any contamination and to assess the resulting risk to human health and the environment. The feasibility study evaluates remedial action alternatives to identify any that are feasible for implementation and that would effectively reduce risk. Historical studies had indicated that current problems would likely include {sup 137}Cs in sediment of the Clinch River, mercury in sediment and fish of Poplar Creek and PCBs and pesticides in fish from throughout the OU. Peak releases of mercury and {sup 137}Cs occurred over 35 years ago, and current releases are low. Past releases of PCBs from the ORR are poorly quantified, and current releases are difficult to quantify because levels are so low. The site characterization focused on contaminants in surface water, sediment, and biota. Contaminants in surface water were all found to be below Ambient Water Quality Criteria. Other findings included the following: elevated metals including cesium 137 and mercury in McCoy Branch sediments; PCBs and chlordane elevated in several fish species, presenting the only major human health risk, significant ecological risks in Poplar Creek but not in the Clinch River.

  19. Potential effects of four Flaming Gorge Dam hydropower operational scenarios on riparian vegetation of the Green River, Utah and Colorado

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    LaGory, K.E.; Van Lonkhuyzen, R.A.

    1995-06-01

    Four hydropower operational scenarios at Flaming Gorge Dam were evaluated to determine their potential effects on riparian vegetation along the Green River in Utah and Colorado. Data collected in June 1992 indicated that elevation above the river had the largest influence on plant distribution. A lower riparian zone occupied the area between the approximate elevations of 800 and 4,200-cfs flows--the area within the range of hydropower operational releases. The lower zone was dominated by wetland plants such as cattail, common spikerush, coyote willow, juncus, and carex. An upper riparian zone was above the elevation of historical maximum power plant releases from the dam (4,200 cfs), and it generally supported plants adapted to mesic, nonwetland conditions. Common species in the upper zone included box elder, rabbitbrush, grasses, golden aster, and scouring rush. Multispectral aerial videography of the Green River was collected in May and June 1992 to determine the relationship between flow and the areas of water and the riparian zone. From these relationships, it was estimated that the upper zone would decrease in extent by about 5% with year-round high fluctuation, seasonally adjusted high fluctuation, and seasonally adjusted moderate fluctuation, but it would increase by about 8% under seasonally adjusted steady flow. The lower zone would increase by about 13% for both year-round and seasonally adjusted high fluctuation scenarios but would decrease by about 40% and 74% for seasonally adjusted moderate fluctuation and steady flows, respectively. These changes are considered to be relatively minor and would leave pre-dam riparian vegetation unaffected. Occasional high releases above power plant capacity would be needed for long-term maintenance of this relict vegetation.

  20. Remedial investigation/feasibility study of the Clinch River/Poplar Creek operable unit. Volume 1: Main text

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-06-01

    This report presents the findings of an investigation into contamination of the Clinch River and Poplar Creek near the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) in eastern Tennessee. For more than 50 years, various hazardous and radioactive substances have been released to the environment as a result of operations and waste management activities at the ORR. In 1989, the ORR was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL), established and maintained under the federal Comprehensive environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Under CERCLA, NPL sites must be investigated to determine the nature and extent of contamination at the site, assess the risk to human health and the environment posed by the site, and, if necessary, identify feasible remedial alternatives that could be used to clean the site and reduce risk. To facilitate the overall environmental restoration effort at the ORR, CERCLA activities are being implemented individually as distinct operable units (OUs). This document is the combined Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study Report for the Clinch River/Poplar Creek OU.

  1. CX-011605: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Asbestos Removal under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.16 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  2. CX-011608: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Routine Maintenance and Custodial Services under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.3 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  3. CX-010400: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Engineered Rubble Pile for Training Exercises at the Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response Training and Education Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 05/16/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  4. CX-011599: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Drop-Off, Collection, and Transfer Facilities for Recyclable Materials under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.35 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.35 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  5. CX-014449: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Drop-Off, Collection, and Transfer Facilities for Recyclable Materials CX(s) Applied: B1.35Date: 12/31/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  6. CX-007780: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Routine Shipping and Transportation of Regulated and Non-Regulated Material, Equipment, or Waste On and Off the Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B1.30 Date: 01/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  7. CX-011603: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Relocation of Buildings under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.22 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  8. CX-011609: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Transfer Actions under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.30 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.30 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  9. CX-011597: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B2.5 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  10. CX-011593: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Oil Spill Cleanup under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B5.6 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B5.6 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  11. CX-011611: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Electronic Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.7 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  12. CX-011607: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Air Conditioning Systems for Existing Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.4 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.4 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  13. CX-011606: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Support Buildings under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.15 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  14. CX-011592: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facilities to Store Packaged Hazardous Waste for 90 Days or Less under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B6.4 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B6.4 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  15. CX-011594: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Actions to Conserve Energy or Water under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B5.1 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  16. CX-011610: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Training Exercises and Simulations under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.2 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  17. CX-011598: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Building and Equipment Instrumentation under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B2.2 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  18. CX-011596: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B3.1 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  19. CX-004085: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Project T-221, Hazardous Material Management and Emergency Response (HAMMER) Operations BuildingCX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 10/08/2010Location(s): Richmond, WashingtonOffice(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office

  20. CX-011602: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Disconnection of Utilities under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.27 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  1. CX-011600: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Traffic Flow Adjustments under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.32 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.32 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  2. CX-011601: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Installation or Relocation of Machinery and Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.31 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  3. CX-011604: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Polychlorinated Biphenyl Removal under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.17 for Calendar Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  4. CX-009664: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Routine Maintenance and Custodial Services under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  5. CX-009662: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Training Exercises and Simulations under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  6. CX-009655: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Building and Equipment Instrumentation under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  7. CX-009653: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Oil Spill Cleanup under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B5.6 Date: 12/15/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  8. CX-009660: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Traffic Flow Adjustments under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.32 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  9. CX-009225: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Project Z-064, Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning System Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B2.1 Date: 09/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  10. CX-009669: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Relocation of Buildings under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  11. CX-009667: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Asbestos Removal under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  12. CX-009666: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Support Buildings under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  13. CX-009670: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Disconnection of Utilities under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  14. CX-009656: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements under10 CFR 1021, Subpart D CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  15. CX-009659: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Actions to Conserve Energy or Water under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  16. CX-009693: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  17. CX-009681: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Electronic Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  18. CX-009668: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Polychlorinated Biphenyl Removal under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.17 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  19. CX-009663: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Transfer Actions under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.30 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  20. CX-009657: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  1. CX-009665: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Air Conditioning Systems for Existing Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart o, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.4 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  2. CX-009654: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Drop-Off, Collection, and Transfer Facilities for Recyclable Materials under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.35 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  3. CX-009661: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Installation or Relocation of Machinery and Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  4. CX-009694: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Outdoor tests and Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components, December 2012 to December 2013 CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 12/12/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  5. CX-010094: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Activity-Specific Categorical Exclusion for Deep Borehole Drilling, Sampling, and Characterization for the Proposed Natural Gas Pipeline from Pasco, Washington to the Hanford Site 200 East Area CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office

  6. Enterprise Assessments Operational Awareness Record for the Assessment of Conduct of Operations in Control Rooms at the Savannah River Site, April 19-20, 2016 (OAR EA-SRS-2016-04-19)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    EA Operational Awareness Record Report Number: EA-SRS-2016-04-19 Site: Savannah River Site Subject: Conduct of Operations in Control Rooms Dates of Activity: 04/19/16 - 04/20/16 Report Preparer: Jeff Snook Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environment, Safety and Health Assessments, within the Office of Enterprise Assessments (EA), reviewed conduct of operations within three control rooms at the Savannah River Site. These control rooms were located at

  7. The legacy of Cf-252 operations at Savannah River Technology Center: Continuous releases of radioiodine to the atmosphere

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kantelo, M.V.; Crandall, B.S.

    1992-12-31

    The iodine isotopes I-132, 1-133, I-134, and I-135, which have half-lives ranging from 53 minutes to 21 hours, are measured in the atmospheric effluent from the Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) near Aiken, South Carolina. SRS is operated by Westinghouse Savannah River Company for the US Department of Energy (DOE). The isotopes` release rates range from 10 to 300 microcuries per week compared to the rate. The resulting annual dose from all iodine isotopes is minor; it comprises 0.01 percent of the total offsite dose due to atmospheric releases from SRS in 1990. Circumstantial evidence indicates the radioiodine originates from traces of unencapsulated Cf-252. The determination that spontaneous fission of Cf-252 is the source of the radioiodine has several ramifications. Radioactive fission-product isotopes of the noble gas elements krypton and xenon must also be released. Noble gases are more volatile and mobile than iodine. Also, the released iodine isotopes decay to xenon isotopes. The noble gases decay to non-gaseous elements that are transported along with radioiodine to the terrestrial environment by deposition from the SRTC plume. Only Sr-89 is believed to accumulate sufficiently in the environment to approach detectable levels. Given similar conditions in earlier years, releases of short-lived radioiodine have occurred undetected in routine monitoring since the early 1970s. Release rates 20 years ago would have been 200 times greater than current release rates. This report documents preliminary experiments conducted by SRTC and Environmental Monitoring Section (EMS) scientists. The release process and the environmental impact of fission products from Cf-252 should be thoroughly researched.

  8. 2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

  9. 2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

  10. EM Richland Operations Office Manager Reflects on River Corridor's Safe, Successful Cleanup

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. – This month, Stacy L. Charboneau marks her first year as manager of EM’s Richland Operations Office (RL), responsible for management and oversight of cleanup of the 586-square-mile Hanford Site.