Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

DOE directives: Improving contractor review and compliance systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Department of Energy contractors are regulated by DOE directives. Rigorous and effective contractor administrative systems to review directives and document compliance are essential. WINCO recognized the need to improve its directives review system. Three areas have been addressed: Computerized tracking, documentation of the review itself--at the requirement rather then the directive level, and the role of the directives administrator. The result is a system that generates and captures information for use in the company rather than simply creating files and that attest to work accomplished.

Airmet, D.

1990-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

2

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

3

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Directives DOE Directives DOE Directives Directives are the Department of Energy's primary means to communicate and institutionalize directives and policies and to establish requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. DOE O 413.3A - Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets DOE G 413.3-1 - Managing Design and Construction Using Systems Engineering for Use with DOE O 413.3A DOE G 413.3-2 - Quality Assurance Guide for Project Management DOE G 413.3-3 - Safeguards and Security for Program and Project Management DOE G 413.3-8 - Environmental Management (EM) Cleanup Projects DOE G 413.3-9 - U.S. Department of Energy Project Review Guide for Capital Asset Projects DOE G 413.3-10 - Earned Value Management System (EVMS)

4

DOE Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review 2007 Review 2007 AWA Facility Update, High Gradient Wakefield Generation, and Future Upgrades Manoel Conde, Sergey Antipov, Felipe Franchini, Wei Gai, Feng Gao, Chunguang Jing, Richard Konecny, Wanming Liu, Jidong Long, John Power, Haitao Wang, Zikri Yusof Argonne Wakefield Accelerator Group High Energy Physics Division April 25 - 27, 2007 2 Outline Description of AWA Facililty. Wakefield structures built and tested. Measurements and simulations. List of next experiments to be performed. Plans for Facility upgrades. 3 AWA Drive Beamline Drive Gun Linac & Steering Coils Quads Wakefield Structure Experimental Chambers 4.5 m GV GV YAG1 YAG2 Spectrometer YAG5 Dump/ Faraday Cup Slits YAG4 YAG3 ICT1 ICT2 BPM Single bunch operation - Q=1-100 nC - Energy=15 MeV - High Current = 10 kAmp

5

Economic assessment of geothermal direct heat technology: A review of five DOE demonstration projects  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In this report the cost of using low temperature geothermal energy resources for direct heating applications is compared to the costs associated with conventional heating fuels. The projects compared all involved replacing conventional fuels (e.g., natural gas and fuel oils) with geothermal energy in existing heating systems. The cost of using geothermal energy in existing systems was also compared with the cost of new coal-fired equipment.

Hederman, William F. Jr.; Cohen, Laura A.

1981-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

6

DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 Agency Sub- agency RIN OMB Control Number Title of Initiative RulelCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date...

7

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship &  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie Hill Roberson (EM-11) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, INEEL Citizens Advisory Board This letter is in response to a November 21, 2003 letter regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship

8

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship &  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs Letter: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie Hill Roberson (EM-11) To: Mr. Monte Wilson, Chair, INEEL Citizens Advisory Board This letter is in response to a November 21, 2003 letter regarding direction and guidance for implementing direct DOE relationship and funding for Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 12, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Mission, Objectives & Scope of the Site Specific Advisory Board Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship

9

Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSAB Memorandum: Direction and Guidance for Implementing Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSAB From: Designated Federal Officer, Sandra L. Waisley (EM-11) To: SSAB Members (G. Stegner, J. Reising, G. Bowman, T. Taylor, C. Gertz, B. Murphie, S. McCracken, M. Marvin, J. Rampe, A. Doswell, C. Anderson, B. Wethington, S. Brennan, K. Kozeliski, D. Dollins, P. Halsey, Y. Sherman, L. Bratcher, R. Warther, K. Klein, R. Schepens, F. Lockhart, J. Allison, R. Erickson, E. Sellers, K. Carlson, G. Boyd, R. Butler) The memorandum informs of Assistant Secrectary Roberson's direction and guidance for implementing a DOE direct relationship and funding approach for EM's Site-Specific Advisory Board (EMSSAB).

10

DOE Standards and Corresponding Directives Crosswalk  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Standards and Corresponding Directives Crosswalk DOE Standard Title Date DOE Order(s) Referenced Does DOE Order Reference Standard(s) DOE-TSL-1-99 Department of Energy Standards Index 5/99 ½ None ½ N/A. DOE-TSL-2-98 Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program 1/88 ½ None ½ N/A. DOE-TSL-4-99 Directory of DOE and Contractor Personnel Involved in Non- Government Standards Activities 5/99 ½ None ½ N/A. DOE-STD-0100T-93 Licensed Reactor Nuclear Safety Criteria Applicable to DOE Reactors 11/93 ½ DOE O 5480.6 ½ Order has been cancelled by N 251.4. DOE-STD-101-92 Compilation of Nuclear Safety Criteria for Potential Application to DOE Nonreactor Nuclear Facilities 3/92 ½ DOE O 5480.5 ½ Order has been cancelled by N 1321.140. DOE-HDBK-1001-96

11

DOE Directives, Regulations, and Standards Portal - Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Globe Image Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program Home Search Approved Standards Recently Approved RevCom Logo RevCom for TSP Drafts for Review Registered Projects...

12

Organizational Sustainability - A New Direction for DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Organizational Sustainability: A New Direction for DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security * Issues Facing the Nation * How DOE Fits in the Resolution of these Issues * Problems Impacting DOE's Ability to Resolve Issues * Definition of Sustainability * Intent of Sustainability Pilot Study * Economic Vitality as the Nation's Foundation Discussion Topics Introduction The vitality of the nation's economy forms the foundation of our high quality of life, our national security, and the hope that future generations will inherit ever-greater opportunities. That vitality is derived largely from the productivity of well-trained people and the steady stream of scientific and technical innovations they produce. Without high-quality, knowledge-intensive careers and

13

DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 | Department of...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report May 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 May2012 ReportDOE525.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report...

14

USCMS DOE/NSF Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

January 17-19 , 2007 University of Texas, Arlington Charge to the committee pdf The Report on the Joint DOENSF Review to the U.S. Department of Energy pdf (Link to main review...

15

DOE-STD-3006-95; DOE Standard Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3006-95 3006-95 November 1995 SUPERSEDING DOE-STD-3006-93 November 1993 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-3006-95 i PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) FOREWORD 1. DOE 0 425.1 establishes the requirement to conduct Operational Readiness Reviews

16

DOE Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dataset on its Environmental Reviews Dataset on its Environmental Reviews DOE Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews January 28, 2010 - 1:44pm Addthis Washington, DC - To further transparency and openness in its implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Department of Energy (DOE) has created a comprehensive database of categorical exclusion (CX) determinations. The information is available at Data.gov and the DOE NEPA Website. This initiative supports the Obama Administration's Open Government Directive and provides easy access to useful information regarding DOE's compliance with NEPA. "This sets a new standard of transparency for the Federal government's implementation of NEPA," said Scott Blake Harris, DOE General Counsel, "and shines a light on an important part of our

17

DOE Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews DOE Launches New Dataset on its Environmental Reviews January 28, 2010 - 1:44pm Addthis Washington, DC - To further transparency and openness in its implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Department of Energy (DOE) has created a comprehensive database of categorical exclusion (CX) determinations. The information is available at Data.gov and the DOE NEPA Website. This initiative supports the Obama Administration's Open Government Directive and provides easy access to useful information regarding DOE's compliance with NEPA. "This sets a new standard of transparency for the Federal government's implementation of NEPA," said Scott Blake Harris, DOE General Counsel, "and shines a light on an important part of our

18

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National...

19

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage...

20

Technical Standards,DOE Standards and Corresponding Directives...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Corresponding Directives Crosswalk More Documents & Publications Technical Standards, DOE Orders and Applicable CFRsDEAR Crosswalk - February 2, 2002 All Active DOE Technical...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

USCMS DOE/NSF Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

February 7-8 , 2006 February 7-8 , 2006 University of California San Diego Charge to the committee [pdf] Main UCSD review page Agenda Logistics Attendees Documentation Agenda: Copies of the slides presented will be available for the meeting. Tuesday February 7, 2006 Start of Meeting 8:30 am Pacific Time (other time zones) Time Title Speaker/Chair Duration 8:30 AM Executive Session 30' 9:00 AM U.S. CMS Overview and CMS Computing [pdf] Lothar Bauerdick 30'+5' 9:35 AM CMS Software and Preparations for Physics[pdf] Avi Yagil 20'+5" 10:00 Coffee 15' 10:15 U.S. CMS S&C Status and Plans[pdf] Ian Fisk 35'+5' 10:55 U.S. CMS Tier-2 Program [pdf] Ken Bloom 20'+5' 11:20 DISUN Status and Plans [pdf] Frank Wuerthwein 20'+5' 11:45 Executive Session 15' 12:00 PM

22

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE EO 13563 December 2012 Update Report and Burden...

23

DOE - NETL Internal Program Review - June 10, 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D DOE-CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review: Load as a Resource (LAAR) September 20, 2012 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Building 90 Room TBD: signage will be posted at the building entrance Agenda 8:00 am Light refreshments available Welcome, Introductions, DOE remarks Phil Overholt, DOE, and Joe Eto, LBNL 8:30 Frequency Responsive Demand Jeff Dagle, PNNL 9:10 Frequency Responsive Load Evaluation and Benefits on Power System Grid Isabelle Snyder, ORNL (by phone) 9:50 Break 10:20 Load as a Regulation Resource, Phase 2 Sila Kiliccote, LBNL 11:00 Scoping Study on Industrial Regulation Nasr Alkadi, ORNL 11:40 Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads Anna Scaglioni, UC Davis

24

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program 6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - HybSim Hybrid Storage Model Development Congressionally-Directed Programs - University of Missouri-Rolla - Grid Modernization - Iowa Stored Energy Project - EEI - BiPolar Ni-MH Battery Development - Sprint - Storage for Telecommunications Apps. - Emerson - Network Power - Beacon Power - Frequency Regulation Plant Design - Mead Westvaco - Research on Lead-Carbon Asymmetric Super capacitors (FY05) ESS Program Makeup (cont.) ESS Program Makeup cont. SBIR - Aegis Technology - PII - Arkansas Power Electronic International -

25

DOE O 251.1C, Departmental Directives Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

To define requirements and responsibilities for implementing the Department of Energy (DOE) Directives Program in support of the Secretary's memorandum of ...

2009-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

26

Transparency and Openness in the DOE Quandrennial Technology Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A letter written under the secretary of science, Steven Koonin, to the meeting participants discussing the DOE Quandrennial Technology Review.

27

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Directions  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio > Fernald > Visitors Center > Directions Ohio > Fernald > Visitors Center > Directions Fernald Preserve Directions Fernald Preserve Directions Fernald Preserve Home Page Visitors Center Directions Event Calendar Community Meeting Room Guided Tour Educational Field Trip Speaker Request Brochures Fact Sheets Presentations BioBlitz Geocaching Pets Policy Fernald Preserve Coordinates NAD83 State Plane Ohio South Easting 1350546 Northing 476599 Latitude 39.288048 N Longitude 84.683540 W Latitude 39 17' 16.974" N Longitude 84 41' 0.746" W Fernald Preserve Addresses Site: 7400 Willey Road Harrison, OH 45013 Mailing: U.S. Department of Energy 10995 Hamilton-Cleves Hwy. Harrison, OH 45030 U.S. Department of Energy Contractor S.M. Stoller Corporation 10995 Hamilton-Cleves Hwy. Harrison, OH 45030

28

DOE Orders, Directives, Guides and Memos DOE O 142.3A, Unclassified...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Orders, Directives, Guides and Memos DOE O 142.3A, Unclassified Foreign Visits and Assignments Program The Order defines a program for unclassified foreign national access to...

29

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 May 2013 Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities This report summarizes and analyzes the results of independent reviews of IVR and associated processes at eight DOE sites conducted by Independent Oversight from August 2011 to September 2012. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to evaluate the processes and methods used for verifying the implementation of safety basis hazard controls and periodically re-verifying that the controls remain in place. Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation

30

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 April 2010 Review of Specific Administrative Controls at DOE Nuclear Facilities The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health Safety and Security occasionally reviews specific focus areas. Focus areas are aspects of safety programs that Independent Oversight determines warrant increased management attention based on reviews of performance data, inspection results, and operating experience across DOE sites. Due, in part, to operating experience and previous inspection results. DOE selected specific administrative controls (SACs) as a focus area. SACs are new or revised technical safety requirements (TSRs)

31

DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review Proceeding before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on DOE's application for a license to construct a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; DOE moves for interlocutory review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's order suspending briefing and consideration of DOE's motion to withdraw its application. Yucca Mountain - U.S. Department of Energy's Petition for Interlocutory Review More Documents & Publications Motion to Withdraw from Yucca Mountain application U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW Yucca Mountain - U.S. Department of Energy's Brief in Support of Review and

32

DOE Review of Regulations- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any...

33

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE 13563 and ICR Report - Final.pdf More Documents & Publications...

34

Review of Self-direct Demand Side Management (DSM) Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review of Self-direct Demand Side Management (DSM) Programs Review of Self-direct Demand Side Management (DSM) Programs Title Review of Self-direct Demand Side Management (DSM) Programs Publication Type Presentation Year of Publication 2012 Authors Borgeson, Merrian Keywords demand side resources: policy, electricity markets, electricity markets and policy group, energy analysis and environmental impacts department, energy efficiency, self direct programs, technical assistance Full Text LBNL recently provided technical assistance funded by DOE to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio to inform their decision-making about changes to their existing self-direct program for commercial and industrial customers. Self-direct programs are usually targeted at large industrial customers with specialized needs or strong in-house energy engineering capacity. These programs are found in at least 24 states, and there is significant variety in how these programs are structured - with important implications for the additionality and reliability of the energy savings that result. LBNL reviewed existing programs and compared key elements of self-direct program design. For additional questions about this work, please contact Merrian Borgeson.

35

DoE CBM Review 03-12-2012 final  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Condition Based Monitoring of Gas Condition Based Monitoring of Gas Turbine Combustion Components Program Review Nancy Ulerich Ph.D. Getnet Kidane Nikolai Tevs Ph.D. Siemens Energy, Inc. DoE Funding Opportunity No. DE-PS26-08NT00440-1B DoE Award Cooperative Agreement No. DE-NT0006833 March 2012 03-14-2012 2 Siemens Energy, Inc. Gas Turbine Combustion Section Online Condition Monitoring Needs Compressor Combustor Turbine Hot section combustion components of gas turbine engine are exposed to harsh operating conditions and high temperatures. As a result, combustion parts have shorter design lives and more frequent maintenance inspection interval requirements than other parts of the turbine engine. Frequent maintenance inspection outages affect engine availability and reliability. Use of sensor technology that directly detect and monitor hardware life online can

36

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for...

37

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CECDOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDADOE...

38

Review of DOE HQ Emergency Response Plans and Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance March 2003 Prepared by Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of...

39

2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review The 2013 Department of Energy (DOE) Building Technologies Office Program Review was held April 2-4, 2013 in Washington, DC. This inaugural review encompassed active work done by the Building Technologies Office (BTO), with a total of 59 individual activities reviewed. Sixty independent experts assessed the progress and contributions of each project toward BTO's mission and goals, and these assessments will be used to enhance the management of existing efforts, gauge the effectiveness of projects, and design future programs. The meeting also provided an opportunity to promote collaborations, partnerships, and technology transfers. 2013 Program Peer Review Report | 2013 Program Peer Review Presentations

40

MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energys (DOEs) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Independent Oversight Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance, March 2003 Independent Oversight Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance, March 2003 The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a review of emergency response plans and performance at DOE Headquarters (HQ) in February 2003. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the readiness and effectiveness of the DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) emergency response teams for a postulated emergency at a field site, and the HQ Incident Command Team for an emergency affecting the Forrestal building. In addition, OA was tasked to evaluate the current status of DOE's Continuity of Operations (COOP) program plans and provide recommendations

42

NERSC/DOE HEP 2012 Review Logistics  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NERSC HPC Achievement Awards Home Science at NERSC HPC Requirements Reviews High Energy Physics (HEP) Logistics Hotel Information Location The review will be held at...

43

A Review of DOE/NETLs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

China Workshop on Mercury Control from Coal Combustion, October 31-November 2, 2005, Beijing, China Fate of Mercury in Coal Byproducts from DOE's Mercury Control Technology Field...

44

Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 April 2013 Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities This report provides lessons learned from the 2012 reviews performed by Independent Oversight. The reviews performed during the fall of 2011 and throughout 2012 were at DOE/NNSA sites with hazard category 1 and 2 nuclear facilities, some of which also have significant quantities of hazardous chemicals on site. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to determine the state of emergency preparedness of selected sites by examining the sites' processes for evaluating plausible severe NPEs;

45

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions Directions Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) ASCR Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (85KB) ASCR Budget ASCR Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of ASCR Funding Opportunities Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) News & Resources Contact Information Advanced Scientific Computing Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-21/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-7486 F: (301) 903-4846 E: sc.ascr@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Directions to the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing and Research at DOE at Germantown, MD From Washington Dulles International Airport: External link

46

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Directions High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (170KB) HEP Budget HEP Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs University Research & National Labs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page a DOE Headquarters ( Red Star ; floor plan .gif file (100KB); picture .jpg file (87KB); aerial photo .jpg file (924KB)) are located 30 miles NW of Washington, DC in Germantown, MD. Horizontal Divider

47

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Directions Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (51KB) BES Budget BES Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Organizational History Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page DOE Headquarters ( ) is located 30 miles NW of Washington, DC in Germantown, MD Floor plan .gif file (100KB) ; Picture .jpg file (87KB) ; Aerial photo .jpg file (924KB)

48

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Directions Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (32KB) NP Budget NP Committees of Visitors Directions Local Map Jobs Labs & Universities Nuclear Physics Related Brochures Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Related Links View local map The DOE office in Germantown, MD are located northwest of Washington, DC. The region is served by 3 airports: BWI - Baltimore-Washington External link

49

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions Directions Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) FES Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (104KB) FES Budget FES Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Fusion and Plasmas Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of FES Funding Opportunities Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Fusion Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-24/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4941 F: (301) 903-8584 E: sc.fes@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page DOE Headquarters in Germantown, MD is located 30 miles northwest of downtown D.C. on the corner of Rt. 118 South and I-270 U.S. Department of Energy 19901 Germantown Road

50

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Headquarters Facilities - March DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Headquarters Facilities - March 2002 March 2002 Review of the Headquarters Facilities Emergency Response Plans The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance conducted a review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters facilities emergency response plans in February 2002. The purpose of this review was to assess the Department's readiness to respond to emergency events, such as fires and hazardous material releases (inside and outside the building), that occur at any of the following facilities: the two primary DOE Headquarters facilities, namely, the James V. Forrestal building, which is located in Washington, D.C., and the main Germantown, Maryland, facility; and the 270 Corporate Center and Cloverleaf

51

Review of DOE HQ Emergency Response Plans and Performance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of Review of DOE Headquarters Emergency Response Plans and Performance March 2003 Prepared by Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT AND PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE REVIEW OF DOE HEADQUARTERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS AND PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted a review of emergency response plans and performance at DOE Headquarters (HQ) in February 2003. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the readiness and effectiveness of the DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) emergency response teams for a postulated emergency at a field site, and the HQ Incident Command Team for an emergency affecting the Forrestal building. In addition,

52

DOE Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Safety |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Safety DOE Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Safety July 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Kevin Dressman, director of the DOE Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement, addresses LATA Kentucky employees during a training session. The June regulatory assistance review was aimed at ensuring worker safety. Kevin Dressman, director of the DOE Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement, addresses LATA Kentucky employees during a training session. The June regulatory assistance review was aimed at ensuring worker safety. PADUCAH, Ky. - DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security headquarters representatives recently spent three days at the Paducah site helping EM cleanup contractor LATA Kentucky better identify and correct issues before

53

RD&I meeting Review DOE Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23,...

54

DOE-STD-1082-94; DOE Standard Preparation, Review, and Approval of Implementaiton Plans For Nuclear Safety Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

82-94 82-94 October 1994 DOE STANDARD PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615)576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95001461 DOE-STD-1082-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard has been prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of Steve

55

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions Directions Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (172KB) BER Budget BER Committees of Visitors Directions Jobs Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information » About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Directions to Department of Energy, Germantown, Maryland and the Office of Biological and Environmental Research Mailing Address: SC-23/Germantown Building

56

DoE CBM Review 03-12-2012 final  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Condition Based Monitoring of Gas Turbine Combustion Components Program Review Nancy Ulerich Ph.D. Getnet Kidane Nikolai Tevs Ph.D. Siemens Energy, Inc. DoE Funding Opportunity No....

57

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE O 425.1D through PXSO Procedure 425.1BC, Pantex Site Office Startup and Restart of Pantex Plant Activities to provide PXSO confidence that the readiness review program is...

58

Directions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions Directions New Brunswick Laboratory (NBL) NBL Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (189KB) Points of Contact (POCs) History Directions Jobs Programs Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) Training Categorical Exclusion Determinations News Contact Information New Brunswick Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Building 350 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439-4899 P: (630) 252-2442 (NBL) P: (630) 252-2767 (CRM sales) F: (630) 252-6256 E: usdoe.nbl@ch.doe.gov About Directions Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The New Brunswick Laboratory is located on the Argonne National Laboratory Site. New Brunswick Laboratory 9800 S. Cass Ave. Building 350 Argonne, IL 60439-4899 To reach Argonne from O'Hare International Airport, take I-294 south to I-55. Exit west on I-55 (toward St. Louis ) and continue for about four

59

Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area Guidance SBIR/STTR Funding Opportunities Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) News & Resources Contact Information Biological and Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-23/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3251 F: (301) 903-5051 E: sc.ber@science.doe.gov More Information »

60

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program 7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Make energy storage ubiquitous ESS Program Makeup ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - BPA ETO based STATCOM Project - ETO Development Project - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - Iowa Stored Energy Project - Electrolyte Research

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Accident analysis and safety review of DOE Category B reactors  

SciTech Connect

DOE is employing the principle of comparability with the NRC requirements to guide its safety program. Since the safety record of research reactors licensed by the NRC has been established and accepted, the comparison of DOE Orders applicable to DOE research reactors with the NRC regulations applicable to research reactors would identify strengths and weaknesses of the DOE Orders. The comparison was made in 14 general topics of safety which are labeled Areas of Safety Concerns. This paper focuses on the Area of accident analysis and safety review and presents recommendations in these areas. 12 refs.

Kimura, C.Y.

1990-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

62

Summary of DOE/PERF water program review.  

SciTech Connect

For many years, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has supported and sponsored various types of water research relating to the oil and gas industry through its Office of Fossil Energy and its National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). In early 2005, the Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (PERF) submitted a proposal to DOE for funding an upcoming PERF meeting that would feature water research in the petroleum industry. PERF is a nonprofit organization created in 1986 to provide a stimulus to and a forum for the collection, exchange, and analysis of research information related to the development of technology concerning the petroleum industry, and a mechanism for establishing joint research projects in that field. Additional information on PERF can be accessed at http://www.perf.org. DOE agreed to provide funding to hold a review of its water research program in conjunction with the fall 2005 PERF meeting. Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) was asked to coordinate and host the meeting, which was referred to as the DOE/PERF Water Program Review. The program review was held on November 1-4, 2005, in Annapolis, Maryland, at the Historic Inns of Annapolis. The purpose of the program review was to provide a forum for sharing information, reviewing current programs (especially recent unpublished research), and reviewing industry and regulatory needs regarding water use and reuse issues. PERF and DOE/NETL can use this information to plan for future water-related research projects. The water program review provided a unique opportunity in several ways. First, DOE was able to have all of the contractors currently receiving DOE funds for water research present in one room at the same time. Each contractor described his or her research and was able to learn about the research being conducted by the other researchers. Second, this forum allowed representatives of many large oil and gas companies to hear about the DOE research projects and offer their reactions to DOE and the researchers. Third, most oil and gas meetings focus on either upstream (the exploration and production sector) or downstream (the refining sector) issues. Typically, there is little overlap in content between the two industry sectors. At the program review, attendees with upstream and downstream orientations were able to spend much of their time in joint sessions and could learn more about the other sector.

Veil, J.; Gasper, J.; Puder, M.; Leath, P.; Environmental Science Division

2006-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

63

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

64

DOE-HDBK-3012-96; Team Leader's Preparation Guide for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INCH-POUND INCH-POUND DOE-HDBK-3012-96 June 1996 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-94 September 1994 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009471 DOE-HDBK-3012-96 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational

65

Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December December 2000 A Report to the Secretary of Energy Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites OVERSIGHT Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................... 5 2.0 Summary of Review Results .............................................................. 8 2.1 Wildland Fire Management Policy ............................................. 8 2.2 Fire/Emergency Hazards Assessments ....................................... 9 2.3 Wildland Fire Prevention and Response .................................. 11 2.4 Offsite Interfaces and Agreements ........................................... 13 2.5 Feedback and Continuous Improvement

66

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage 8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Develop advanced power electronics for the grid of the future

67

NETL: 2010 Conference Proceedings - DOE/EPA Collaborative Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE/EPA Collaborative Review - Tracking Geologically - Sequestered CO2: Monitoring, Verification, & Accounting (MVA), Simulation, and Risk Assessment DOE/EPA Collaborative Review - Tracking Geologically - Sequestered CO2: Monitoring, Verification, & Accounting (MVA), Simulation, and Risk Assessment March 23-24, 2010 Table of Contents Disclaimer Presentations PRESENTATIONS Welcoming Remarks Bill Aljoe, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Program Overview [PDF-1.2MB] Sean Plasynski, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Program Overview [PDF-954KB] Barbara Klieforth, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Research Session 1 - Risk Assessment Overview of DOE National Risk Assessment Program for CO2 Sequestration [PDF-2.1MB] George Guthrie, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Risks Posed by Brines Containing Dissolved Carbon Dioxide [PDF-1.3MB]

68

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Independent Peer Reviews  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Manufacturing Fuel Cells Applications/Technology Validation Safety Codes and Standards Education Basic Research Systems Analysis Systems Integration Independent Reviews Macro-System Model U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Systems Integration > Independent Peer Reviews Printable Version Independent Peer Reviews DOE's Systems Integrator convenes independent technical reviews to gauge progress toward meeting specific technical targets and to provide technical information necessary for key decisions. These independent reviews are important to the program: They provide an unbiased understanding of the status of the program's technical targets based on the input of independent technical experts. This understanding is critical to program decision-making, budget

69

DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 DOE Issues Environmental Assessment on Road Project for Public Review The U.S. Department of Energy has issued for public review and comment a draft environmental assessment of the potential environmental impacts of building an internal road to safely ship radioactive material within the Idaho National Laboratory. DOE�s preferred alternative under the environmental assessment is to develop a new, internal road that would connect the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center with the Materials and Fuels Complex, a distance of about 20 miles. It would allow the INL to safely ship nuclear materials from the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center and the Materials and Fuels Complex without having to utilize public roads, like Highway 20, which adds additional cost and security considerations to each shipment.

70

Paper on "Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NOTE TO: Cynthia L. Quarterman NOTE TO: Cynthia L. Quarterman Department of Energy Agency Review Team FROM: Janet Z. Barsy Qi Special AssistantO ffice of the General Counsel SUBJECT: Paper on "Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE" DATE: December 5, 2008 At our meeting on November 24, 2008, you expressed an interest in major litigation of direct interest to the Department where DOE has an interest in the outcome of the suit although it is not a party to the litigation. Attached is a paper prepared by the Office of the Deputy General Counsel for Litigation that summarizes such cases. The claims in one of the cases, E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Stanton, are briefly discussed in the Transition Paper entitled Pending Significant Litigation Matters under the section "Alleged Exposures to Radioactive and/or Toxic

71

Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2008 2008 Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE Entergy Corporation v. EPA; PSEG Fossil LLC v. Riverkeeper, Inc.; Utility Water Group v. Riverkeeper, Inc., S. Ct. Nos. 07-588, 07-589, and 07-597. The question presented in this litigation is whether Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1326(b), authorizes EPA to compare costs and benefits in determining the "best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact" at cooling water intake structures. The Second Circuit held that EPA may not engage in cost-benefit analysis in determining the "best technology available," and that consideration of cost is limited to choosing "a less expensive technology that achieves essentially the same results" as the best technology that industry can reasonably bear. EPA did

72

DOE O 413.2B Admin Chg 1, Laboratory Directed Research and Development  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order establishes DOE requirements for laboratory directed research and development (LDRD) while providing the laboratory director broad flexibility for ...

2006-04-19T23:59:59.000Z

73

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 15, 2013 February 15, 2013 Agency/ Sub- agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/GC N/A Request for information on reducing regulatory burden DOE is continually engaging in review of its rules to determine whether there are burdens on the public that can be avoided by amending or rescinding existing requirements. To that end, while DOE is always open to receiving information about the impact of its regulations, it published this RFI to solicit public input. August 8, 2012 (77 FR 47328) This information solicitation is expected

74

Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reviews Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Reviews NP Early Career Opportunities & Awardees Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Funding Opportunities Reviews Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page To ensure that funding is allocated as efficiently as possible, the NP program has developed a system of planning and priority setting that relies heavily on input from groups of outside experts. NP has also instituted a

75

DOE Hydrogen Analysis Repository: Review of FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review of FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership Review of FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership Project Summary Full Title: Review of the Research Program of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership Previous Title(s): Review of the Research Program of the FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership Project ID: 203 Principal Investigator: Brief Description: The National Research Council's Committee on Review of the FreedomCAR and Fuel Research Program evaluates the structure and management of the Partnership as well as the Partnership's adequacy, progress, and technical problem areas on a biannual basis. Keywords: Advanced technology vehicles, fuel cells, hydrogen storage, hydrogen production Purpose Evaluate DOE-sponsored research efforts directed at the goal of a hydrogen economy under the U.S. DRIVE Partnership (formerly the FreedomCAR and Fuel

76

Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 2-3-12.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 3, 2012 February 3, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel, Room 6A245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted via e-mail to: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) Dear DOE staff: The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. I. EEI Has a Direct Interest in This Proceeding EEI is the association of shareholder-owned electric utilities in the United States, international affiliates, and industry associates worldwide. Our U.S. members serve 95

77

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18 -22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia.

Satyapal, S.

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting June 16, 2014...

79

NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Energy NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of...

80

DOE … NETL Internal Program Review … June 10, 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OE TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY PROGRAM OE TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY PROGRAM North American Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Advanced Applications Research and Development (AARD) Internal Program Review June 27-28, 2013 L'Enfant Plaza Hotel | 480 L'Enfant Plaza Hotel SW, Washington, DC 20024 RENOIR ROOM-Second Floor Meeting logistics: Dana Robson, LBNL (cell: 415-335-1679) Draft Agenda Thursday, June 27 (Day 1) 7:30 am Morning refreshments available 8:00 am Welcome, Introductions, DOE remarks Joe Eto, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Phil Overholt, US DOE, OE Transmission Reliability Program SESSION I (all sessions allow 20 minutes for presentations/10 minutes for Q&A) 8:30 am Baselining Studies and Analysis Bharat Bhargava, Electric Power Group 9:00 am Baselining Studies and Analysis

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage 9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Significant Events in FY09 Power Electronics Subprogram suffered a large budget cut in FY09 and was dropped as a separate program for FY10. ESSP will reabsorb power electronics development for energy storage applications back into program. Funding Due to a lengthy Congressional continuing resolution, FY09 funding was not received until April Power Electronics Sub-Program ESSP Program Highlights

82

1992 DOE/Sandia crystalline photovoltaic technology project review meeting  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document serves as the proceedings for the annual project review meeting held by Sandia National Laboratories` Photovoltaic Technology and Photovoltaic Evaluation Departments. It contains information supplied by organizations making presentations at the meeting, which was held July 14--15, 1992 at the Sheraton Old Town Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Overview sessions covered the Department of Energy (DOE) program, including those at Sandia and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), and non-DOE programs, including the EPRI concentrator collector program, The Japanese crystalline silicon program, and some concentrating photovoltaic activities in Europe. Additional sessions included papers on Sandia`s Photovoltaic Device Fabrication Laboratory`s collaborative research, cell processing research, the activities of the participants in the Concentrator Initiative Program, and photovoltaic technology evaluation at Sandia and NREL.

Maish, A. [ed.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2005 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2005 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

84

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2006 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2006 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

85

Direct use of hydrothermal energy: a review of environmental aspects  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The potential environmental impacts of the exploration, development, and production of hydrothermal geothermal energy for direct use applications are reviewed and evaluated. Mitigation strategies and research and development needs are included. (MHR)

O'Banion, K.; Layton, D.

1981-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

86

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2009 Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and...

87

Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 December 2000 Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites The initial joint review was conducted between October 15 and December 15, 2000, by the Offices of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), Security and Emergency Operations (SO), and Environment, Safety and Health (EH). The purpose of the initial joint review was to assess the abilities of DOE sites to prevent and respond to wildland fires and provide recommendations for pertinent site-specific and DOE-wide improvements. Initial Joint Review, Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites - December 2000 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0760

88

DNFSB Review Coordination - DOE Directives Workshop April 2007  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and implementation of the standards relating to the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of defense nuclear facilities of the Department of Energy (including all...

89

January 30, 2008, New Directions in Learning: Building a DOE University System  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Directions in Learning at DOE: Building a DOE University System FTCP Teleconference January 30, 2008 Dr. Jeff T.H. Pon Chief Human Capital Officer U.S. DOE 1 Mission Critical Function Needed Competencies Assess and/or Certify Possession of Competencies Training & Development Programs Aligned with Competencies IDP To Improve Performance and Close Competency Gaps Mission & Strategic Goals DOE is Implementing a Competency- Centric Learning Framework The DOE Competency Framework Enables Strategic Alignment of Learning & Development Systems to Strategic Goals 2 U = Universal Competencies: universal competencies needed by every individual to be effective in today's work environment. Examples may include: *Resolving Conflict *Emotional Intelligence *Team Skills

90

Proceedings of the 1993 DOE/NREL Hydrogen Program Review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy has conducted programs of research and development in hydrogen and related technologies since 1975. The current program is conducted in accordance with the DOE Hydrogen Program Plan FY 1993--FY 1997 which was published in June 1992. The plan establishes program priorities and guidance for the allocation of funding. The core program. currently under the Office of Energy Management, supports projects in the areas of hydrogen production, storage and systems research. A program review is held annually to evaluate each research project for technical quality, progress and programmatic benefit. The evaluation is conducted by a panel of technical experts. This proceedings of the Program Review conducted in May 1993 is a compilation of all research projects supported by the Hydrogen Program during FY 1993. It is produced in the anticipation that will serve as a useful technical reference for those interested in the status of hydrogen technologies. Selected papers have been indexed separately for inclusion in the Energy Science and Technology Database.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

DOE-HDBK-3012-2003; DOE Handbook Guide to Good Practices for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-96 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Handbook, is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The guidance in this document is the distillation of the experience and lessons learned during numerous operational readiness reviews contributed by team leaders with a wide range of backgrounds. There are

92

DOE Workshop on Hydrogen Production via Direct Fermentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Workshop on Workshop on H H Y Y D D R R O O G G E E N N P P R R O O D D U U C C T T I I O O N N V V I I A A D D I I R R E E C C T T F F E E R R M M E E N N T T A A T T I I O O N N June 9, 2004 Baltimore, Maryland DOE-OFFICE OF HYDROGEN, FUEL CELLS AND INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................1 Workshop Format ......................................................................................................1 Workshop Results ......................................................................................................2 TABLES Table 1. Results of Group Discussion on Neoterics/NREL Boundary Analysis Report .................................................................................................................

93

Second Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site Completed; Report Now Available Online Second Site-Wide Five-Year Review of Cleanup at DOE's Idaho Site Completed; Report Now Available Online February 3, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Danielle Miller (DOE-ID) 208-526-5709 An Idaho Cleanup Project team has completed work on the site-wide five-year review of cleanup at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Idaho site. "This report verifies that the performance of cleanup actions at the Idaho Site continues to be protective of human health and the environment," said Nicole Hernandez, DOE's project manager for the five-year review. "The findings in the report demonstrate a strong collaborative effort by CH2M-WG Idaho (CWI), DOE, the Environmental

94

EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to request for...

95

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

if their product or equipment cannot be tested under the DOE test procedure, or if testing under the DOE test procedure would evaluate the product or equipment in a manner...

96

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2010 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2010 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell...

97

Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, C. Phillips, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters - please see document for full distribution list, including SSAB Administrators, Designated Deputy Federal Officers, SSAB Federal Coordinators and Office Site Managers The letter is in regards to progress made to date in implementing a direct DOE relationship and funding for the EM Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 22, 2003 More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management

98

Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs Letter: Progress in Implementing a Direct DOE Relationship & Funding for the EMSSABs From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, C. Phillips, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters - please see document for full distribution list, including SSAB Administrators, Designated Deputy Federal Officers, SSAB Federal Coordinators and Office Site Managers The letter is in regards to progress made to date in implementing a direct DOE relationship and funding for the EM Site Specific Advisory Boards. Roberson Letter - December 22, 2003 More Documents & Publications Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management

99

LABORATORY DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL REPORT TO THE DOE - DECEMBER 2001.  

SciTech Connect

Brookhaven National (BNL) Laboratory is a multidisciplinary laboratory that carries out basic and applied research in the physical, biomedical, and environmental sciences, and in selected energy technologies. It is managed by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC, under contract with the U. S. Department of Energy. BNL's total annual budget has averaged about $450 million. There are about 3,000 employees, and another 4,500 guest scientists and students who come each year to use the Laboratory's facilities and work with the staff. The BNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program reports its status to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) annually in March, as required by DOE Order 4 13.2, ''Laboratory Directed Research and Development,'' March 5, 1997, and the LDRD Annual Report guidance, updated February 12, 1999. The LDRD Program obtains its funds through the Laboratory overhead pool and operates under the authority of DOE Order 4 13.2. The goals and objectives of BNL's LDRD Program can be inferred from the Program's stated purposes. These are to (1) encourage and support the development of new ideas and technology, (2) promote the early exploration and exploitation of creative and innovative concepts, and (3) develop new ''fundable'' R&D projects and programs. The emphasis is clearly articulated by BNL to be on supporting exploratory research ''which could lead to new programs, projects, and directions'' for the Laboratory. As one of the premier scientific laboratories of the DOE, BNL must continuously foster groundbreaking scientific research. At Brookhaven National Laboratory one such method is through its LDRD Program. This discretionary research and development tool is critical in maintaining the scientific excellence and long-term vitality of the Laboratory. Additionally, it is a means to stimulate the scientific community and foster new science and technology ideas, which becomes a major factor in achieving and maintaining staff excellence and a means to address national needs within the overall mission of the DOE and BNL. The LDRD Annual Report contains summaries of all research activities funded during Fiscal Year 2001. The Project Summaries with their accomplishments described in this report reflect the above. Aside from leading to new fundable or promising programs and producing especially noteworthy research, the LDRD activities have resulted in numerous publications in various professional and scientific journals and presentations at meetings and forums. All FY 2001 projects are listed and tabulated in the Project Funding Table. Also included in this Annual Report in Appendix A is a summary of the proposed projects for FY 2002. The BNL LDRD budget authority by DOE in FY 2001 was $6 million. The actual allocation totaled $5.3 million. The following sections in this report contain the management processes, peer review, and the portfolio's relatedness to BNL's mission, initiatives and strategic plans. Also included is a metric of success indicators.

FOX,K.J.

2001-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2008 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen Program George Thomas, Sandia National Laboratory, retired This award recognizes George Thomas' past and continued technical excellence and outstanding dedication to the DOE Hydrogen Program in support of the President's Advanced Energy Initiative and the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative. Thomas' contributions to the Hydrogen Storage activity have

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Microsoft Word - DOE-ID-11-002 DOE Direct cooling system [1].doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 SECTION A. Project Title: Cooling System for Substation Bldg CPP-613 SECTION B. Project Description The scope of work includes the purchase and installation of an Energy Star compliant 208V three phase staged cooling system capable of maintaining CPP-613 at a temperature below 85 degrees F. The system shall be designed to operate at an elevation of 5000 feet with outside environmental temperatures ranging from -20°F to 100°F. The cooling system shall be pad mounted on the east side of the building between the two cable feeds. The concrete pad will be provided by DOE. The scope of work includes purchasing an appropriately sized cooling system, placing the unit on the concrete pad, making all necessary wall penetrations into the building, installing ductwork and air handlers inside the building, and installing a

102

DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the project evaluations and comments from the DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Program Review. Hydrogen production, delivery and storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; and education R&D projects funded by DOE in FY2004 are reviewed.

Not Available

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Initial Joint Review of Wildland Fire Safety at DOE Sites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

strengthen the Department's capabilities in preventing and responding to wildland fires. DOE orders and policy guidance do not clearly establish or convey expectations for...

104

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE Smart Grid Demonstration Program ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Demonstration Program Smart Grid Energy Storage Demonstrations Overview Ron Staubly - National Energy Technology Laboratory DOE Smart Grid Demonstration Program The Program At a...

105

NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Energy NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Department of Energy Unpublished order of the D.C. Circuit dismissing the National Association of Regulatory Utiliy Commissioners' petition for review; Petioners requested that the Court issue three orders: (1) that the Secretary conduct an annual assessment under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, (2) that the Nuclear Waste Fund fee be suspended pending completion of his annual assessment; and (3) that the Secretary suspend the NWF fee in light of the current status of DOE's waste disposal program; Court dismissed the first two claims as moot and the third claim as unripe. NARUC v. DOE - Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States

106

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings The US Department of Energy Hydrogen Program held its 2005 Annual Merit Review May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. Principal investigators presented their project status and results in these presentations and posters. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations A. Distributed Production Technologies B. DOE Fossil Energy C. Separations D. Biomass Reforming E. Biological Production F. Photoelectrochemical Production G. Electrolysis H. DOE Nuclear Energy I. Hi-Temp Thermochemical J. Hydrogen Delivery Posters A. Distributed Production Technologies B. DOE Fossil Energy C. Separations D. Biomass Reforming E. Biological Production F. Photoelectrochemical Production

107

DOE Office of Indian Energy Foundational Course on Direct Use for Building Heat and Hot Water  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Direct Use for Building Direct Use for Building Heat and Hot Water Webinar (text version) Below is the text version of the Webinar titled "DOE Office of Indian Energy Foundational Courses Renewable Energy Technologies: Direct Use for Building Heat and Hot Water." Slide 1 Amy Hollander: Hello, I'm Amy Hollander with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Welcome to today's webinar on Building Heat and Hot Water sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs. This webinar is being recorded from DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory's new state-of-the-art net zero

108

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Graphic of the White House with text that refers to the DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, Washington, DC, June 9 - 13, 2008. Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the DOE Hydrogen Program's Annual Merit Review on June 9-13 in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations Production & Delivery Distributed BILI Production Electrolysis High-Temperature Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Biomass Gasification Biological Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen From Coal

111

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Logo for the 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Review, May 16-19, Washinton, D.C. The DOE Hydrogen Program held its Annual Merit Review May 16-19, 2006 in Arlington, Virginia. Principal investigators presented their project status and results in these oral and poster presentations. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations Distributed Production Photoelectrochemical Production Electrolysis Nuclear Energy Initiative Hi-Temp Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen from Coal Posters Distributed Production Separations Biomass Reforming Biological Production Photoelectrochemical Electrolysis Nuclear Energy Initiative Hi-Temp Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery

112

2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Review: Hydrogen Codes and Standards  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A PowerPoint presentation given as part of the 2005 Hydrogen Program Review, May 24, 2005, in Washington, D.C.

Ohi, J.

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Construction Review | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policies EFRCs FOA Applications from Universities and Other Research...

114

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to Congress Policies and Acts Financial Opportunities Related Links U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Library > Annual...

115

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to Congress Policies and Acts Financial Opportunities Related Links U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Library > Annual...

116

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: Annual Merit Review and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports to Congress Policies and Acts Financial Opportunities Related Links U.S. Department of Energy Search help Home > Library > Annual...

117

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Merit Review...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Proceedings The U.S. Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program held its 2004 Annual Merit Review May 24-27, 2004 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Principal investigators presented the...

118

Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to DOE Entergy Corporation v. EPA; PSEG Fossil LLC v. Riverkeeper, Inc.; Utility Water Group v. Riverkeeper, Inc., S. Ct. Nos. 07-588, 07-589, and 07-597. The question presented in this litigation is whether Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1326(b), authorizes EPA to compare costs and benefits in determining the "best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact" at cooling water intake structures. The Second Circuit held that EPA may not engage in cost-benefit analysis in determining the "best technology available," and that consideration of cost is limited to choosing "a less expensive technology that achieves essentially the same results" as the best technology that

119

Review of DOE Waste Package Program. Semiannual report, October 1984-March 1985. Volume 8  

SciTech Connect

A large number of technical reports on waste package component performance were reviewed over the last year in support of the NRC`s review of the Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Environmental Assessment reports. The intent was to assess in some detail the quantity and quality of the DOE data and their relevance to the high-level waste repository site selection process. A representative selection of the reviews is presented for the salt, basalt, and tuff repository projects. Areas for future research have been outlined. 141 refs.

Davis, M.S. (ed.)

1985-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

DOE Petitions for NRC Review in Yucca Mountain Proceeding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The United States Department of Energy today filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission a petition requesting that the Commission review and reverse an order by the NRCs Atomic Safety and...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

McCray DOE Review 8.22.12.ppt  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23,...

122

ORISE: Enhancing Peer Review Tools and Services to Support DOE...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to specific presentations prior to the five-day U.S. Department of Energy's Hydrogen Fuel Cells and Vehicle Technologies annual program evaluation and review-the largest for...

123

Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Laboratories » LPE Home » Laboratory Directed Laboratories » LPE Home » Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process Laboratory Planning Process Work for Others in the Office of Science Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) DOE's Philosophy on LDRD Frequently Asked Questions Success Stories Brochures Additional Information LDRD Program Contacts Technology Transfer DOE National Laboratories Contact Information Laboratory Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of Energy SC-32/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5447 F: (202) 586-3119 Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Department of Energy's Engine of Discovery

124

Review of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) Assessments for the DOE Hanford Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this review is to assess the need for updating Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) assessments for the DOE's Hanford Site, as required by DOE Order 420.1B Chapter IV, Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation, based on significant changes in state-of-the-art NPH assessment methodology or site-specific information. This review is an update and expansion to the September 2010 review of PNNL-19751, Review of Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) Assessments for the Hanford 200 Areas (Non-Seismic).

Snow, Robert L.; Ross, Steven B.

2011-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

125

Proceedings of the advanced research and technology development direct utilization, instrumentation and diagnostics contractors' review meeting  

SciTech Connect

The 1990 Advanced Research and Technology Development (AR TD) Direct Utilization, and Instrumentation and Diagnostics Contractors Review Meeting was held September 16--18, 1990, at the Hyatt at Chatham Center in Pittsburgh, PA. The meeting was sponsored by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy, and the Pittsburgh and Morgantown Energy Technology Centers. Each year the meeting provides a forum for the exchange of information among the DOE AR TD contractors and interested parties. This year's meeting was hosted by the Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center and was attended by 120 individuals from industry, academia, national laboratories, and other governmental agencies. Papers were presented on research addressing coal surface, science, devolatilization and combustion, ash behavior, emission controls for gases particulates, fluid bed combustion and utilization in diesels and turbines. Individual reports are processed separately for the data bases.

Geiling, D.W. (USDOE Morgantown Energy Technology Center, WV (USA)); Goldberg, P.M. (eds.) (USDOE Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center, PA (USA))

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Joint DOE/NSF Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Joint DOENSF Status Meeting of U.S. LHC Software and Computing July 8, 2004 at DOE, Germantown, MD Agenda | Documentation | Attendees | Report Purpose: Status review of the U.S....

127

DOE Energy in Indian Country Conference and Annual Tribal Energy Program Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The 2012 DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Tribal Energy Program Review in Denver, Colorado, will provide an overview of the wide range of renewable energy and energy efficiency...

128

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2010 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2010 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen Program Team Awards (with special recognition for outstanding technical contributions): Production and Delivery Jamie Holladay, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) This award recognizes Jamie Holladay for his outstanding contributions to hydrogen production and delivery. He completed a two-year assignment in July, 2009, with the Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies (FCT)

129

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2011 Annual Merit Review Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2011 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2011 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Team Awards (with special recognition for outstanding technical contributions): Production Tom Jaramillo, Stanford University This award recognizes Tom Jaramillo for the invaluable contributions he has made to the program in the field of photoelectrochemical (PEC) hydrogen production. Dr. Jaramillo has been an instrumental driving force in EERE's

130

Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the DOE Complex  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Follow-up Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the Department of Energy Complex OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 3 2.0 STATUS OF DOE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ...................................................... 5 Overall Assessment .......................................................................... 5 Improvements to Emergency Management Programs at DOE Sites Since 1998 .................................................................. 5 Continuing Weaknesses ................................................................... 7 Underlying Causes ...........................................................................

131

Proceedings of the 1995 U.S. DOE hydrogen program review, Volume 1  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document containes reports from the proceedings of the 1995 U.S. DOE hydrogen program review. Reports are organized under the topics of systems analysis, utilization, storage, and production. This volume, Volume I, contains the reports concerned with systems analysis and utilization. Individual reports were processed separately for the DOE data bases.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2010 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held June 7-11, 2010 in Washington, D.C.

Not Available

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

1990 DOE/SANDIA crystalline photovoltaic technology project review meeting  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document serves as the proceedings for the annual project review meeting held by Sandia's Photovoltaic Cell Research Division and Photovoltaic Technology Division. It contains information supplied by each organization making a presentation at the meeting, which was held August 7 through 9, 1990 at the Sheraton Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Sessions were held to discuss national photovoltaic programs, one-sun crystalline silicon cell research, concentrator silicon cell research, concentrator 3-5 cell research, and concentrating collector development.

Ruby, D.S. (ed.)

1990-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

Order Module--DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS Order Module--DOE-STD-1104-2009, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections that are intended to provide only an overview of the material contained in DOE-STD-1104-2009, which should be consulted for complete information. The first section covers the introduction, applicability, and chapters 1 and 2. The second section covers chapters 3, 4, and 5. We have provided examples throughout the module to help familiarize you with the material. The examples will also help prepare you for the practice at the end of this module and for the criterion test.

135

DOE Office of Indian Energy Foundational Course on Direct Use for Building Heat and Hot Water  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DIRECT USE FOR BUILDING HEAT & HOT WATER Presented by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Course Outline 2 What we will cover...  About the DOE Office of Indian Energy Education Initiative  Course Introduction  Solar Thermal and Solar Ventilation Air Pre-Heat - Resources, Technology, Examples & Cost, and References  Biomass Heat - Resources, Technology, Examples & Cost, and References  Geothermal Building Heat - Resources, Technology, Examples & Cost, and References  Additional Information & Resources Introduction The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs is responsible for assisting Tribes with energy planning and development, infrastructure, energy costs, and electrification of Indian

136

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

DOE-STD-1134-99 Review Guide for Criticality Safety Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-99 4-99 September 1999 DOE STANDARD REVIEW GUIDE FOR CRITICALITY SAFETY EVALUATIONS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1134-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy Standard is approved for use by all DOE criticality safety personnel. It contains guidelines that should be followed when reviewing Criticality Safety Evaluations that

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Review of four DOE-sponsored low temperature steam systems  

SciTech Connect

The system characteristics and limited operating experience of four DOE-sponsored low temperature steam system field tests are described. The West Point Peperell (Honeywell) installation in Farifax, Alabama, has been operational for nine months but has experienced numerous minor equipment and system problems and a major problem with its shadow bar tracker. The other three installations are not operational yet. Johnson and Johnson (Acurex) in Sherman, Texas, is currently in the startup and checkout phase and will be operational in December, 1979. Home Laundry (Jacobs-Del) in Pasadena, California, and Tropicana Products (General Electric) in Bradenton, Florida, are both well into the construction phase and expect to be operational in February, 1980.

Gerich, J.W.

1979-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

142

SUMMARY REPORT OF THE DOE DIRECT LIQUEFACTION PROCESS DEVELOPMENT CAMPAIGN OF THE LATE TWENTIETH CENTURY  

SciTech Connect

Following the petroleum price and supply disruptions of 1973, the U.S. government began a substantial program to fund the development of alternative fuels. Direct coal liquefaction was one of the potential routes to alternative fuels. The direct coal liquefaction program was funded at substantial levels through 1982, and at much lower levels thereafter. Those processes that were of most interest during this period were designed to produce primarily distillate fuels. By 1999, U.S. government funding for the development of direct coal liquefaction ended. Now that the end of this campaign has arrived, it is appropriate to summarize the process learnings derived from it. This report is a summary of the process learnings derived from the DOE direct coal liquefaction process development campaign of the late twentieth century. The report concentrates on those process development programs that were designed to produce primarily distillate fuels and were largely funded by DOE and its predecessors in response to the petroleum supply and price disruptions of the 1970s. The report is structured as chapters written by different authors on most of the major individual DOE-funded process development programs. The focus of the report is process learnings, as opposed to, say, fundamental coal liquefaction science or equipment design. As detailed in the overview (Chapter 2), DOE's direct coal liquefaction campaign made substantial progress in improving the process yields and the quality of the distillate product. Much of the progress was made after termination by 1983 of the major demonstration programs of the ''first generation'' (SRC-II, H-Coal, EDS) processes.

F.P. Burke; S.D. Brandes; D.C. McCoy; R.A. Winschel; D. Gray; G. Tomlinson

2001-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

Journal Review: Biomolecular Engineering, Bioengineering, Biochemicals, and Food Directed Evolution: Past, Present, and Future  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Journal Review: Biomolecular Engineering, Bioengineering, Biochemicals, and Food Directed Evolution online January 18, 2013 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) Directed evolution evolution, modern directed evolution came of age 20 years ago with the demonstration of repeated rounds

Zhao, Huimin

144

Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 5-29-12.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29, 2012 29, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel, Room 6A245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted via e-mail to: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Dear DOE staff: The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is again asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. Though DOE has just granted an extension of the comment deadline in today's Federal Register from today to June 19, 2012, we are filing these comments now so DOE can have the benefit of our views.

145

Specific Administrative Controls Review at the Hanford Site with EM at DOE-RL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report on its Participation in a Review of Selected Aspects of Nuclear Safety at the Hanford Site Plutonium Finishing Plant, November 29 - December 3, 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. During the review, Independent Oversight personnel reviewed a few of the SACs applicable to the Plutonium Finishing Plant.

146

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Logo for the 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, May 15-18, Washington, D.C. Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the DOE Hydrogen Program's Annual Merit Review on May 15-18, 2007 in Washington, D.C. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations Distributed Production Biological Production Separations Electrolysis Photoelectrochemical Production Hi-Temp Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen from Coal Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Posters Central Biomass Biological Production Compressed/Liquid Tanks

147

DOE Greenbook - Needs and Directions in High-Performance Computing for the Office of Science  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The NERSC Users Group (NUG) encompasses all investigators utilizing the NERSC computational and storage resources of the Department of Energy Office of Science facility. At the February 2001 meeting held at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing (NERSC) facility, the NUG executive committee (NUGEX) began the process to assess the role of computational science and determine the computational needs in future Office of Science (OS) programs. The continuing rapid development of the computational science fields and computer technology (both hardware and software) suggest frequent periodic review of user requirements and the role that computational science should play in meeting OS program commitments. Over the last decade, NERSC (and many other supercomputer centers) have transitioned from a center based on vector supercomputers to one almost entirely dedicated to massively parallel platforms (MPPs). Users have had to learn and transform their application codes to make use of these parallel computers. NERSC computer time requests suggest that a vast majority of NERSC users have accomplished this transition and are ready for production parallel computing. Tools for debugging, mathematical toolsets, and robust communication software have enabled this transition. The large memory and CPU power of these parallel machines are allowing simulations at resolutions, timescales, and levels of realism in physics that were never before possible. Difficulties and performance issues in using MPP systems remain linked to the access of non-uniform memory: cache, local, and remote memory. This issue includes both the speed of access and the methods of access to the memory architecture. Optimized mathematical tools to perform standard functions on parallel machines are available. Users should be encouraged to make heavy use of those tools to enhance productivity and system performance. There are at least four underlying components to the computational resources used by OS researchers. (1) High-Performance Computing Technology; (2) Advanced Software Technology and Algorithms; (3) Energy Sciences Network; and (4) Basic Research and Human Resources. In addition to the availability from the vendor community, these components determine the implementation and direction of the development of the supercomputing resources for the OS community. In this document we will identify scientific and computational needs from across the five Office of Science organizations: High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Basic Energy Sciences, Fusion Energy Science, Biological and Environmental Research, and Advanced Scientific Computing Research. We will also delineate the current suite of NERSC computational and human resources. Finally, we will provide a set of recommendations that will guide the utilization of current and future computational resources at the DOE NERSC.

Rotman, D; Harding, P

2002-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

DOE 2010 Safety and Security Reform Project - HSS Directives Disposition and Status (December 4, 2012)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10 Safety and Security Reform Project - HSS Directives Disposition and Status (December 4, 2012) 10 Safety and Security Reform Project - HSS Directives Disposition and Status (December 4, 2012) Page 1 of 3 2010 HSS Directives Disposition Status Secretary of Energy Notice SEN-35-91, Nuclear Safety Policy Revise Complete - see Policy 420.1. Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment Revise Complete - see Order 458.1. Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Revise Complete - see Order 422.1. Order 5480.20A, Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements Revise Complete - see Order 426.2. Order 5480.30, Nuclear Reactor Design Criteria Re-certify Complete - re-certified. Manual 140.1-1B, Interface with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Re-certify Complete - re-certified.

149

Merit Review System | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Grants Policy and Guidance » Merit Review System Grants Policy and Guidance » Merit Review System Grants & Contracts Support Grants & Contracts Support Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) DOE National Laboratory Announcements Grants Process Grants Policy and Guidance Grant/Cooperative Agreement Forms FAQs Resources Contract Information Contact Information Grants & Contracts Support U.S. Department of Energy SC-43/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 301-903-2859 E: sc.grantsandcontracts@science.doe.gov Grants Policy and Guidance Merit Review System Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Action: Notice (Published in the Federal Register) Background Summary: The Office of Science (SC) (Formerly Office of Energy Research) published this revision to its Merit Review System in the Federal

150

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Merit Review Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2012 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program presents "Program Awards" for contributions to the overall efforts of the Program, and "Sub-Program Awards" to recognize achievements in specific areas. This year, the Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Office and the Vehicle Technologies Office also presented a joint "Special Recognition Award." Special Recognition Award from the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and the Vehicle Technologies Office Judi Abraham, Conference Management Associates, Inc. As a special tribute, the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office recognize Ms. Judi Abraham for her exceptional

151

Relationship between the DOE loan guaranty and California Environmental Quality Act environmental review processes  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is involved in numerous geothermal research, development, demonstration, and loan guaranty projects in the State of California. These projects often require the preparation of both an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), as required by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Impact Statement (EIS) as required under NEPA. DOE adoption or utilization of information contained in EIR's to meet that agency's NEPA requirements and thereby reduce duplication of effort is dependent on four critical issues: (1) the scope of the proposed action analyzed, (2) the completeness of treatment of environmental issues, (3) the level of DOE involvement in EIR preparation, and (4) the timing of DOE involvement in EIR preparation. At this time, several constraints prevent the integration of the DOE Loan Guaranty and CEQA environmental review and documentation processes. First, the time required to complete an EIR (up to 2 years in some cases) is not compatible with DOE's goal of processing loan guaranty applications within a 4 month period. Second, the CEQA process is usually initiated and completed prior to DOE's involvement in the project. Therefore, DOE often has no role in document preparation and must verify the content of an EIR before adopting or using that document and often must prepare a separate DOE EA even though an EIR exists.

Mezga, L.J.; Brechbill, R.A.

1980-09-09T23:59:59.000Z

152

Review Dates (updated October 2013) | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Review Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Project Construction Photos Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov SC Projects Review Dates (updated November 2013) Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Project Location Date National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) Mini Review GTN 12/4/13 12 GeV Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) Upgrade Mini Review GTN 12/9/13 National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) BNL 1/29-30/14

153

Program in geothermal well technology directed toward achieving DOE/DGE power-on-line goals  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document presents the material used in an oral presentation to the DOE/Division of Geothermal Energy, which was designed to illustrate the importance of well technology development in reducing geothermal well costs, and to achieve geothermal power-on-line goals. Examination of recent studies of the economics of geothermal energy leads to the conclusion that the overall sensitivity of geothermal power-on-line to well cost is in the range of one to two. Current data suggest that a vigorous R and D program in rotary drilling technology can reduce geothermal drilling costs by about 20%, but a reduction of 40 to 50% is needed to achieve DOE/DGE goals. Research in advanced drilling systems is needed to satisfy this more stringent requirement. Some critical technological deficiencies that occur when current rotary drilling techniques are used for geothermal drilling are discussed. A broadly based development program directed at correcting these deficiencies is defined.

Polito, J.; Varnado, S.G.

1978-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

154

Proceedings of the 5. DOE review of laboratory programs for women  

SciTech Connect

The Fifth DOE Review of Laboratory Programs for Women was held at Brookhaven National Laboratory, May 6--8, 1996, and was co-sponsored by Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. The 1996 Review was organized as a Professional Workshop, that is, there were Invited Talks, plus Oral and Poster Presentations from the participants. These sessions were organized around the Focus Topics selected for the Review. The Focus Topics were: school-lab programs, college programs, positive image of women, cultural audits, employee development, employee mentoring, networking, dependent care, and alternate work schedules. On Monday evening, Toni Joseph gave an informal talk to the participants. She stressed the importance of submitting the Action Items for the respective facilities, and assured them that they would be looked at by the Office of Energy Research. On Tuesday morning, the DOE Points-of-Contact (POC) presented an overview of the past Reviews to give some background on the present DOE Review, and discussed plans for the future. The Review concluded with Focus Sessions, one for each Focus Topic. Each of these sessions was charged with producing a report on the session topic. The Focus Group Reports are included in the Proceedings, along with abstracts to the invited talks, oral presentations and poster presentations.

NONE

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

155

Geothermal Program Review VII: proceedings. DOE Research and Development for the Geothermal Marketplace  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Each year the Geothermal Technology Division of the US Department of Energy conducts an indepth review of its entire geothermal R and D program. The 2--3 day conference serves several purposes: a status report on current R and D activities, an assessment of progress and problems, a review of management issues, and a technology transfer opportunity between DOE and the US geothermal industry. This year's conference, Program Review 7, was held in San Francisco on March 21--23, 1989. As indicated by its title, ''DOE Research and Development for the Geothermal Marketplace'', Program Review 7 emphasized developing technologies, concepts, and innovations having potential for commercial application in the foreseeable future. Program Review 7 was comprised of eight sessions including an opening session and a special presentation on the ''Role of Geothermal Energy in Minimizing Global Environmental Problems.'' The five technical sessions covered GTD-sponsored R and D in the areas of hydrothermal (two sessions), hot dry rock, geopressured, and magma. Presentations were made by the relevant field researchers, and sessions were chaired by the appropriate DOE Operations Office Geothermal Program Manager. The technical papers and commentary of invited speakers contained in these Proceedings have been compiled in the order in which they were presented at Program Review 7.

Not Available

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

156

Program and Abstracts: DOE Solar Program Review Meeting 2004, 25--28 October 2004, Denver, Colorado  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This booklet contains the agenda and abstracts for the 2004 U.S. DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program Review Meeting. The meeting was held in Denver, Colorado, October 25-28, 2004. More than 240 abstracts are contained in this publication. Topic areas for the research papers include laboratory research, program management, policy analysis, and deployment of solar technologies.

Not Available

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

Proceedings of the 1995 U.S. DOE hydrogen program review. Volume II  

SciTech Connect

The 1995 US DOE Hydrogen Program Review was held April 18-21, 1995 in Coral Gables, FL. Volume II of the Proceedings contains 8 papers presented under the subject of hydrogen storage and 17 papers presented on hydrogen production. Selected papers are indexed separately for inclusion in the Energy Science and Technology Database.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Review and Selection of Research Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Review and Selection of Research Projects Review and Selection of Research Projects High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Review and Selection of Research Projects Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page All research projects supported by the Office of High Energy Physics (HEP)

159

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen, fuel cell, and vehicle technologies projects at the 2009 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 18-22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Graphic of the Lincoln Memorial lit up at dusk with the text: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting which was held in Arlington, Virginia, on May 18-22, 2009 From here, access presentations and posters from the AMR: Plenary Session Hydrogen Program Vehicle Technologies Program Hydrogen Program

160

Comparative Review FOA Rules for Proposal Submission | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Comparative Review Comparative Review High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Comparative Review Annual Solicitation Progress Reports and Final Report Conferences Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Guidelines Comparative Review Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 9-7-12.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2012 7, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel, Room 6A245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted via e-mail to: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012) Dear DOE staff: The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI). In the RFI, the Department of Energy (DOE) is asking for comments on ways to streamline its regulations and to eliminate unnecessary ones, so as to make the regulations less burdensome and more effective. EEI already has filed the attached two sets of comments earlier this year offering such recommendations, to which DOE has not yet responded. We wish to reiterate them.

162

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit / Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy Physics Graduate Fellows in High Energy Theory Guidelines Advisory Committees News & Resources Contact Information High Energy Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-25/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3624 F: (301) 903-2597 E: sc.hep@science.doe.gov More Information » Peer Merit / Review Policies Confidentiality of Research Proposals and Peer Reviews Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page

163

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the 2012 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 14-18 in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Presentations and posters are grouped by topic and subtopic where applicable and appear in the order in which they were presented within those categories. See the 2012 AMR schedule for a full listing of oral presentation and poster presentation dates and times. Plenary Session - Part I: Joint Plenary, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells

164

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 9-13 in Washington, D.C. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Presentations and posters are grouped by topic and subtopic where applicable and appear in the order in which they were presented within those categories. See the 2011 AMR schedule for a full listing of oral presentation and poster presentation dates and times. Joint Plenary Session Plenary Session Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program

165

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the 2013 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 13-17 in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Presentations and posters are grouped by topic and subtopic where applicable and appear in the order in which they were presented within those categories. See the 2013 AMR schedule for a full listing of oral presentation and poster presentation dates and times. Plenary Session - Part I: Joint Plenary, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells

166

Q: What are you (DOE) looking for in your accounting system review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Accounting Systems Accounting Systems Accounting Systems Question: Why are you doing an accounting system review, what are you (DOE) looking for, and what do you need from me? Answer: DOE policy requires an accounting system review when we have not previously funded an organization. The standards for an acceptable financial system are found at 10 C.F.R. 600.121, 600.220, and 600.311. The specific requirements differ slightly by type of organization but common to all is the need for an accounting system that is adequate for the accumulation and segregation of costs on a project-by-project basis. Also your system must have controls and be able to account for all funds, property, and other assets. Your accounting system must be adequate to permit the reports we require.

167

DOE handbook: Guide to good practices for operational readiness reviews (ORR) team leader`s guide  

SciTech Connect

This guidance section provides instructions, explanations and examples for the performance of all phases of an Operational Readiness Review (ORR). Details pertinent to the Team Leader (TL), Team Members (TM) and Review Coordinator (RC) are outlined. An appendix contains sample forms and correspondence which are typically used to initiate and perform the ORR. Although this document was written specifically for use by DOE ORR Team Leaders, its use may also be beneficial to contractor ORR Team Leaders. The handbook is also useful for Team Leaders of Readiness Assessments conducted in accordance with requirements of DOE O 425.1. Lessons learned, which are promulgated with this handbook, will benefit any line manager, particularly those preparing a facility or process for startup or restart.

NONE

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

DOE/NETL's Mercury Control Technology R&D Program Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE/NETL's Mercury Control Technology R&D Program Review DOE/NETL's Mercury Control Technology R&D Program Review July 14-15, 2004 Table of Contents Disclaimer Papers and Presentations Program Review Overview Sorbent Injection Research Panel Discussion: Sorbent Injection for Hg Control Mercury Control Technology R&D I Poster Session Mercury Control Technology R&D II By-Product Characterization Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government or any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

169

Does  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

170

Thermal batteries: A technology review and future directions  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Thermally activated (``thermal``) batteries have been used for ordnance applications (e.g., proximity fuzes) since World War II and, subsequent to that, in nuclear weapons. This technology was developed by the Germans as a power source for their V2 rockets. It was obtained by the Allies by interrogation of captured German scientists after the war. The technology developed rapidly from the initial primitive systems used by the Germans to one based on Ca/CaCrO{sub 4}. This system was used very successfully into the late 1970s, when it was replaced by the Li-alloy/FeS{sub 2} electrochemical system. This paper describes the predominant electrochemical couples that have been used in thermal batteries over the years. Major emphasis is placed on the chemistry and electrochemistry of the Ca/CaCrO{sub 4} and Li-alloy/FeS{sub 2} systems. The reason for this is to give the reader a better appreciation for the advances in thermal-battery technology for which these two systems are directly responsible. Improvements to date in the current Li-alloy/FeS{sub 2} and related systems are discussed and areas for possible future research and development involving anodes, cathodes, electrolytes, and insulations are outlined. New areas where thermal-battery technology has potential applications are also examined.

Guidotti, R.A.

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

AHAM Comments_DOE Reg Review Sept 2012_FINAL.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 7, 2012 September 7, 2012 By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). AHAM represents manufacturers of major, portable and floor care home appliances, and suppliers to the industry. AHAM's more than 150 members employ tens of thousands of people in the U.S. and produce more than 95% of the household appliances shipped for sale within the

172

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV2 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00035  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REV2 REV2 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00035 I. Project Title: LIMITED FIREBREAK MAINTENANCE ON THE HANFORD SITE DURING CALENDAR YEAR 2011 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, etc.): The u.s. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to perform limited firebreak maintenance in selected areas of the Hanford Site during calendar year 2011 using prescribed burning, dis king, and/or blading. Prescribed burning will be conducted by the Hanford Fire Department and only in previously disturbed areas. Similarly, dis king and blading will be conducted by the Hanford Mission Support Contractor Road Maintenance organization and only

173

CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa Stored Energy Park DOE Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review Fairmont Hotel Washington, DC September 29, 2008 Kent Holst, Development Director Iowa Stored Energy Park Funding: Congressional Ear-mark CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Today's Presentation Past Present Future Funding CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE c CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Iowa's municipal utilities saw this. 1. Economic feasibility studies. 2. Geologic research. 3. Computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Will ISEP make money? 1. Missouri River Energy Services. 2. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Next steps: 1. Drill two test wells. 2. Pump tests, water & air. 3. Refine computer modeling. CAPTURING THE POWER OF NATURE Funding 1. Municipal utilities -$1.15 million. 2. DOE - $6 million. 3. Iowa Power Fund - $3.2 million.

174

2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2/2010 2/2010 1 2010 DOE Peer Review Update Conference LIST OF ATTENDEES Last Name First Name Organization Country Aalmans Luc General Compression USA Adams Michael Constellation Energy USA Agar Ertan Drexel University USA Agrawal Poonum Sentech, Inc USA Ahmed Jasim BOSCH USA Akhil Abbas Sandia National Laboratories USA Alexander Iwan Case Western Reserve University USA Alexander Jane USA Amy Fabrice Air Products USA Anderson Dianne Case Western Reserve University USA Anderson Travis Sandia National Laboratories USA Andrews George Oak Ridge National Laboratory USA Arseneaux James Beacon Power Corporation USA Aselage Terrence Sandia National Laboratories USA Asgeirsson Haukur DTE Energy USA Atcitty Stan Sandia National Laboratories USA

175

Microsoft PowerPoint - DOE_Review_June2013-TrudnowskiV2.pptx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Stability Stability Assessment DOE/OE Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review Meeting June 27-28, 2013 Washington DC Dan Trudnowski, Montana Tech John Pierre, U of Wyoming 2 Project Overview * Objective: Develop, test, and refine algorithms to automatically estimate and quantify oscillations from PMUs in real time. * Application - Real-Time Situational Awareness based upon actual system observations * Time line: - April 2006 thru April 2015 * Participants: - Dan Trudnowski, Montana Tech - John Pierre, University of Wyoming - Louis Scharf, Colorado State University (Retired) - Lots of graduate students * Collaborators: - Ning Zhou, PNNL (funded independently) - Bonneville Power Administration * Advisors - John Hauer, PNNL (Retired) - Bill Mittelstadt, BPA (Retired) Dynamic Response Types

176

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

177

DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lex lex 00023 L Projed Tide: u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF RIVER PROTECTION NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Phase IL Determination of manium in ~water. U. Project DeKriptioD a&d LHaDea (iDdudiBg Time Period Ova- wlDdr plopasetl actioB will oceur and Projed' DimeDsioas - e.g.. acres dispJaced/distwbal,. eunatioft ~~ ek..): The objective of this project is to desi~ build, deploy and test a field deployable insttt:tm.ent that can perform near-rea1 ~ fully autonomous measurements of uranium in contaminated groundwater plmnes.. The approximate dimensions of the deployable uranium ~ are Z x 2 x 4 feet. The system periodically samples Y«1lter from existing aquifer tubes., and. the sampies are analyzed for u.ranium concentration using a colorimetric cbelation sysWn.. Analytical teSUlts are

178

Literature Review of Uncertainty of Analysis Methods, (DOE-2 Program), Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This literature review covers the DOE-2 simulation program, which is one of the legacy programs in the ESLs Emissions Calculator (eCalc), a web-based emissions reductions calculator. The eCalc program is a tool for those who want to see how their energy savings have reduced NOx emissions, which are produced by on-site combustion of natural gas, or at fossil-fuel burning power plants that supply the electricity. This report includes a brief history of the development of the DOE-2 program, and includes an analysis of the reported accuracies of the DOE-2 program. For the validation of the DOE-2 program, peer-reviewed literature that presented case studies using one of three methodologies (empirical, comparative, or analytical) were reviewed and summarized.

Haberl, J. S.; Cho, S.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

Directions to HEP | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

for non U.S. citizens requires at least one month advanced notice. The Office of High Energy Physics is located on the fourth floor of G-wing and H-wing in the DOE complex. a...

180

Directions to BES | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

for non U.S. citizens requires at least one month advanced notice. The Office of Basic Energy Sciences is located on the fourth floor of E-wing and F-wing in the DOE complex....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

New directions for QA in basic research: The Fermilab/DOE-CH experience  

SciTech Connect

This paper addresses the underlying problems involved in developing institution-wide QA programs at DOE funded basic research facilities, and suggests concrete ways in which QA professionals and basic researchers can find common ground in describing and analyzing those activities to the satisfaction of both communities. The paper is designed to be a springboard into workshop discussions which can define a path for developing institution-wide QA programs based on the experience gained with DOE-CH and Fermilab.

Bodnarczuk, M.

1989-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

Directions to NP | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Directions to NP Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About NP NP Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (32KB) NP Budget NP Committees of Visitors Directions to NP Local Map NP Jobs Labs &...

183

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

184

Supplement Analysis for the System Operation Review EIS (DOE/EIS-0170/SA-1)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 2002 20, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the System Operation Review EIS (DOE/EIS-0170/SA-1) Anthony G. White - PGPL-5 Public Utility Specialist and Secretary, United States Entity Proposed Action: Non-Treaty Storage Agreement (NTSA) - Contract Extension, Contract Number DE-MS79- 90BP92754. Proposed By: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and B.C. Hydro and Power Authority (BC Hydro). Location: British Columbia, Canada. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA and BC Hydro propose to extend the existing NTSA for a period of one year. Analysis: On July 5, 1990, BPA and BC Hydro signed the NTSA, which expanded the amount of non- Treaty storage space available in Canada and extended the then-existing agreement from 1993 to

185

Program Overview DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Overview Overview DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal May 13-14, 2003 presented by E. S. Marmar on behalf of the C-Mod Group C Mod Alcator - Physics and Technology Transport Edge/Divertor RF MHD Integrated Thrusts Advanced Tokamak Burning Plasma Support Next Step(s) High Bootstrap, High β N Quasi-Steady State High Field, High Pressure C Mod Alcator - C Mod Alcator - Unique Capabilities ⇒ Address Key Questions * Unique long pulse capability (relative to skin and L/R times) * highly shaped, diverted, high pressure plasma * 5 second pulse length at B = 5 T → Quasi-steady lower hybrid driven AT scenarios * fully relaxed current profiles * High performance, compact, high field capability →Next Step Burning Plasma issues * Tight e-i coupled regimes * H-mode threshold * Pedestal regulation *

186

ESS 2012 Peer Review - ARPA-E Storage Overview - Mark Johnson, DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Storage Overview Storage Overview September 26, 2012 DOE Energy Storage Review Mark Johnson Advanced Research Projects Agency * Energy 2006 Rising Above the Gathering Storm (National Academies) 2007 America COMPETES Act ARPA-E Launched at National Academies: April 27, 2009 First Funding Announcement: May 2, 2009 Innovation based on science and engineering will be primary driver of our future prosperity & security 2009 ARRA ($400M appropriated) A Brief History of of ARPA-E FY11 Budget CR ($180M appropriated) FY12 Budget ($275M appropriated) 2 Advanced Research Projects Agency * Energy Venture Capital and Small Businesses Private Equity/Capital & Large Corporations Government Procurement Office of Science Applied Energy Offices Technology Maturity

187

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV3 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00060  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

REV3 REV3 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00060 I. Project Title: Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For CY 2012 Scheduled To Take Place Under CX B1.23, "Demolition and Disposal of Buildings" II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, etc.): Washington River Protection Solutions LLC (WRPS) will demolish and dispose of buildings on & near the Hanford Site during Calendar Year 2012. WRPS will perform all activities in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) limitations set forth in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A & B to Subpart D, & CX B1.23. WRPS' facilities include all those identified in

188

Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Material Handling Equipment Demonstration - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Todd Ramsden National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 275-3704 Email: todd.ramsden@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Peter Devlin Phone: (202) 586-4905 Email: Peter.Devlin@ee.doe.gov Subcontractor: Oorja Protonics, Inc., Fremont, CA Project Start Date: June 1, 2010 Project End Date: March 31, 2013 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Operate and maintain fuel-cell-powered material * handling equipment (MHE) using direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) technology. Compile operational data of DMFCs and validate their * performance under real-world operating conditions. Provide an independent technology assessment that * focuses on DMFC system performance, operation, and

189

Program Direction and Analysis | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Organization » Program Direction and Organization » Program Direction and Analysis Deputy Director for Resource Management Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Organization Chart .pdf file (77KB) Budget Business Policy and Operations Communications and Public Affairs Grants & Contracts Support Human Resources and Administration Program Direction and Analysis Scientific & Technical Information (OSTI) Contact Information Program Direction & Analysis U.S. Department of Energy SC-46/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-7994 F: (301) 903-8583 More Information » Resource Management Organization Program Direction and Analysis Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page The Program Direction budget supports federal salaries and services that

190

DOE G 430.1-1 Chp 7, Direct/Indirect Costs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This chapter provides recommended categories for direct and indirect elements developed by the Committee for Cost Methods Development (CCMD) and describes ...

1997-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

191

Directions to ASCR | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

(ASCR) ASCR Home About ASCR ASCR Staff Organization Chart .pdf file (33KB) ASCR Budget ASCR Committees of Visitors Directions to ASCR ASCR Jobs ASCR Research ASCR Facilities...

192

DOE/EA-1635: Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project (March 2010)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 Williston to Tioga Transmission Line Project Environmental Assessment for Pre-approval Review DOE/EA - 1635 March 2010 Acronyms and Abbreviations °C degrees Celsius AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 amsl above mean sea level APLIC Avian Power Line Interaction Committee BEPC Basin Electric Power Cooperative BFE Base Flood Elevation BGEPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act BMP best management practice CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO 2 carbon dioxide Council Advisory Council on Historic Preservation CRP Conservation Reserve Program

193

Proposal for Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Proposal for Reviews Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About NP Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Funding Opportunities Award Search Reviews Proposal for Reviews NP...

194

AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Security  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

counterintelligence policy and information requirements applicable to the management of unclassified access approval with U.S. and DOE national security and program-specific policies, requirements, and objectives. b. Secretarial Memorandum, Policy Exclusion for Unclassified Foreign National's Access to Department of Energy

Wechsler, Risa H.

195

Report of the DOE Review Committee on the baseline validation of the Superconducting Super Collider  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Secretary of Energy directed that an independent review of the current cost and schedule baseline for the SSC be conducted. The purpose of this independent review was to validate the current cost and schedule baseline and to ensure that the project status is accurate as currently reported. Through May 1993, approximately $1.5 billion of the baseline cost of $8.249 billion had been expended, with project completion forecasted on the baseline schedule as of September 1999. This report documents the findings of the SSC Baseline Validation Review Committee (the Committee). The report is organized into five parts. The first section is the Executive Summary. This introduction is followed by a discussion of the project progress/status as determined by the Committee. The next section describes the Committee`s estimate of the cost at completion for the SSC project, followed by an assessment of the adequacy of the business management systems currently being used to manage the project. The final section presents the Committee`s conclusions and recommendations. The main body of the report is followed by the subcommittee reports and appendices.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

196

INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE BUILDING 100 PLUME, FORMER DOE PINELLAS SITE (YOUNG - RAINEY STAR CENTER), LARGO, FLORIDA  

SciTech Connect

Contaminated groundwater associated with Building 100 at the Young-Rainey Science, Technology, and Research Center, formerly the DOE Pinellas plant, is the primary remedial challenge that remains to be addressed at the site. Currently, Building 100 is an active industrial facility that is now owned and operated by the Pinellas county government. Groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells recently installed near the southern boundary of the site suggest that contaminated groundwater has migrated off the plant site. In response to the challenges presented by the Building 100 plume, the Office of Legacy Management (LM) requested assistance from the DOE Office of Groundwater and Soil Remediation (EM-32) to provide a review team to make technical recommendations so that they can efficiently and effectively address characterization and remediation of the plume. The review team was unanimous in the conclusion that a dynamic strategy that combines a phased implementation of direct push samplers, sensors, and tools can be used to better delineate the extent of contamination, control plume migration, and rapidly remediate the contaminated groundwater at the site. The initial efforts of the team focused on reviewing the site history and data, organizing the information into a conceptual model, identifying appropriate technologies, and recommending an integrated strategy. The current groundwater data from the site indicate a two-lobed plume extending to the east and south. To the east vinyl chloride is the primary contaminant of concern, to the south, vinyl chloride and cis1, 2-DCE are the primary contaminants. The limited data that are available suggest that reductive dechlorination of the TCE is already occurring but is not sufficient to prevent offsite migration of low concentrations of TCE daughter products. The team recommends that DOE pursue a strategy that builds on the natural cleansing capacity of the subsurface with reductive methods including biostimulation and/or bioaugmentation to provide a sustainable remediation system within the flow path of the plume. Additional data will be required to implement this approach and will include: (1) Better delineation of the nature and extent of contamination; (2) Demonstration the plume is currently stable or shrinking; and (3) Demonstration the full reductive dechlorination is occurring. The technical team recommends that DOE use a phased approach to identify residual contamination and to provide rapid installation of remedies. Matrices of characterization and remediation sensors, technologies, and tools were developed by the team in order to match the specific conditions and requirements of the site. The team provides a specific example of remedy that includes the incorporation of a dynamic characterization strategy moving from minimally invasive to more aggressive field techniques, the consideration of multiple complementary remediation approaches based on a spatiotemporally phased approach keyed to the different demands of different parts of the plume, and the integration and sequencing of the characterization and remediation activities.

Eddy-Dilek, C.; Rossabi, J.; Amidon, M.; Riha, B.; Kaback, D.

2010-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

197

Wackenhut Services, Incorporated: Report from the DOE Voluntary Protection Program onsite review, August 10--14, 1998  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes the Department of Energy Voluntary Protection Program (DOE-VPP) Review Team`s findings from the five-day onsite evaluation of Wackenhut Services, Inc. (WSI) at Savannah River Site (SRS), conducted August 10-14, 1998. The site was evaluated against the program requirements contained in US Department of Energy Voluntary Protection Program, Part 1: Program Elements to determine its success in implementing the five DOE-VPP tenets. The Team determined that WSI has met in varying degrees, all the tenets of the DOE-VPP. In every case, WSI programs and procedures exceed the level or degree necessary for compliance with existing standards, DOE Orders, and guidelines. In addition, WSI has systematically integrated their occupational safety and health (OSH) program into management and work practices at all levels. WSI`s efforts toward implementing the five major DOE-VPP tenets are summarized.

1999-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

Audit of the DOE's Commercial Laboratory Quality Assurance Evaluation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ombudsman FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work...

199

Audit Report: DOE/IG-0851 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

200

Inspection Report: DOE-IG-0882 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Inspection Report: DOE/IG-0853 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FOIA Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About...

202

AISI-DOE Direct Steelmaking Program. Annual report for the year ending November 30, 1993  

SciTech Connect

This program has completed its 5th year since cost-share funding provided by DOE. The following tasks are reported on: budget, patents, talks, and publications; design and construction of gas cleaning and tempering loop; construction of pressurized smelter and operation of combined smelter and offgas system; study for ironmaking demonstration plant and for steelmaking processes; and laboratory research programs at universities and companies.

Aukrust, E.

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Budget and Schedule Budget and Schedule DoE Review 2003-2008 Co-Operative Agreement Renewal May 13-14, 2003 presented by E. S. Marmar on behalf of the C-Mod Group C Mod Alcator - C Mod Alcator - National Budget Profiles 22,569 96 427 1,934 20,112 FY04 29,887 29,450 28,710 27,610 25,250 National Project Total 137 130 125 120 110 LANL 630 610 585 560 540 U Texas 2,920 2,810 2,700 2,600 2,500 PPPL 26,200 25,900 25,300 24,330 22,100 MIT FY08 FY07 FY06 FY05 FY04 Institution Guidance 5 Year Proposal 2003 2002 Cryopump/Up. Div. Inner Div Up Adv. Tok. n-control, power, long pulse ITB Studies Overview Schedule (Program Planning Budgets) Operations: 25 Run Weeks/Year (04 - 08) Full Facility Utilization RFX Beam CXRS, MSE, BES Calendar Year 2006 2005 2004 Long Pulse Beam Edge Fluctuation Imaging Hard X-Ray Imaging Alcator C-Mod Tang. HIREX Add Horiz Ports

204

Review of Operation and Maintenance Experience in the DOE-EPRI Wind Turbine Verification Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

All the projects within the US Department of Energy (DOE) Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) Wind Turbine Verification Program (TVP) are now in operation. As a result, the emphasis of the owners and operators has shifted from installation and commissioning to a focus on optimizing the operation and maintenance (O and M) activities of the projects. Each project utilizes a unique strategy for performing O and M. O and M personnel for projects in Searsburg, Vermont; Glenmore, Wisconsin; Algona, Iowa; Springview, Nebraska; Kotzebue, Alaska; and Big Spring, Texas include on-site vendor representatives, dedicated utility personnel, and utility personnel who split their time between the wind turbines and other utility responsibilities. Each project has its own set of priorities for balancing turbine availability against safety, minimizing overtime pay, and other utility responsibilities. Various strategies have also been employed to ensure access to tools and spare parts. This paper compares and contrasts the various O and M strategies at TVP projects and reviews the causes of turbine downtime and the frequency and duration of faults.

Conover, K.; VandenBosche, J.; Rhoads, H. (Global Energy Concepts, LLC); Smith, B. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

2000-09-05T23:59:59.000Z

205

Joint DOE/NSF Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Joint DOENSF Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing January 13-16 at Fermilab Charge to the Review Committee, Questions to US CMS Report on the Joint DOENSF Review of U.S. LHC...

206

EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response torequest for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on...

207

Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Transuranic Storage Area Retrieval Enclosue Restrieval Restart DOE Readiness Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ID-2011-09-22 ID-2011-09-22 Site: Idaho Site - Idaho Cleanup Project Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Transuranic Storage Area-Retrieval Enclosure (TSA-RE) Retrieval Restart Department of Energy Readiness Assessment Dates of Activity : 09/20/2011 - 09/22/2011 Report Preparer: Aleem Boatright Activity Description/Purpose: A review of nuclear safety implementation verification review (IVR) procedures and processes was conducted at the Idaho Site from September 12-22, 2011. The scope originally included shadowing of the Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) Idaho Cleanup Project IVR for the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project (SBWTP).

208

Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project Transuranic Storage Area Retrieval Enclosue Restrieval Restart DOE Readiness Assessment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ID-2011-09-22 ID-2011-09-22 Site: Idaho Site - Idaho Cleanup Project Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadow Review of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Transuranic Storage Area-Retrieval Enclosure (TSA-RE) Retrieval Restart Department of Energy Readiness Assessment Dates of Activity : 09/20/2011 - 09/22/2011 Report Preparer: Aleem Boatright Activity Description/Purpose: A review of nuclear safety implementation verification review (IVR) procedures and processes was conducted at the Idaho Site from September 12-22, 2011. The scope originally included shadowing of the Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) Idaho Cleanup Project IVR for the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project (SBWTP).

209

Directions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

spacer spacer spacer About DOE Organization News Contact Us Search Search Go spacer U.S. Department of Energy header image Science & Technology Energy Sources Energy Efficiency...

210

DOE/EIA-0466(86) Energy Information Administration Profiles of Foreign Direct  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6) 6) Energy Information Administration Profiles of Foreign Direct Investment in U.S. Energy 1986 \ This publication is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). Ordering infor mation and purchase of this and other Energy Information Administration (EIA) publications may be obtained from the GPO or the EIA's National Energy Information Center (NEIC). Questions on energy statistics should be directed to the NEIC. Addresses and telephone numbers appear below. National Energy Information Center, El-231 Energy Information Administration Forrestal Building Room 1F-048 Washington, DC 20585 (202) 586-8800 Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington. DC 20402 (202) 783-3238 Released for Printing December 23, 1987

211

DOE/EIA-0466(85) Energy Information Administration Profiles of Foreign Direct  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5) 5) Energy Information Administration Profiles of Foreign Direct Investme nt in U.S. Energy 1985 is publication is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). Ordering information and purchase of this and other Energy Information Administration (EIA) publications may be obtained from the GPO or the EIA's National Energy Information Center (NEIC). Questions on energy statistics should be directed to the NEIC. Addresses and telephone numbers appear below. National Energy Information Center, El-20 Energy Information Administration Forrestal Building Room 1F-048 Washington, DC 20585 (202) 586-8800 Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 (202) 783-3238 Released for Printing January 9, 1987

212

Review of processes for the release of DOE real and non-real property for reuse and recycle  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes the underlying historical and regulatory framework supporting the concept of authorizing release for restricted or unrestricted reuse or recycle of real and non-real U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) properties containing residual radioactive material. Basic radiation protection principles as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection are reviewed, and international initiatives to investigate radiological clearance criteria are reported. Applicable requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency, DOE, and the State of Washington are discussed. Several processes that have been developed for establishing cleanup and release criteria for real and non-real DOE property containing residual radioactive material are presented. Examples of DOE real property for which radiological cleanup criteria were established to support unrestricted release are provided. Properties discussed include Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Project sites, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project sites, the Shippingport decommissioning project, the south-middle and south-east vaults in the 317 area at Argonne National Laboratory, the Heavy Water Components Test Reactor at DOE`s Savannah River Site, the Experimental Boiling Water Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory, and the Weldon Spring site. Some examples of non-real property for which DOE sites have established criteria to support unrestricted release are also furnished. 10 figs., 4 tabs.

Ranek, N.L.; Kamboj, S.; Hensley, J.; Chen, S.Y.; Blunt, D.

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

The DOE Office of Environmental Management International Collaboration Program Overview: Interactions, Agreements, and Future Direction  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As the lead U.S. agency for the environmental cleanup, the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) carries out international activities in support of U.S. policies and objectives regarding accelerated risk reduction and remediation of the environmental legacy of the nation's nuclear weapons program and government-sponsored nuclear energy research. To achieve this, EM pursues collaborations with foreign government organizations, educational institutions, and private industry to assist in identifying technologies and promote international collaborations that leverage resources and link international experience and expertise. An initiative of the International Program is to link international experience and expertise to the technical needs of the overall EM mission and to foster further collaboration with international partners to promote those needs. This paper will provide an overview of the current international program and how it plans to leverage existing, and when necessary, new international partnerships to support the overall EM cleanup mission. In addition it will examine the future vision of the international program to promote the EM mission through a focus on transformational solutions, science, and technology development.

Marra, James C.; Fox, Kevin M.; Jannik, Gerald T.; Farfan, Eduardo B.; Kim, Dong-Sang; Vienna, John D.; Roach, Jay; Aloy, A. S.; Stefanovsky, S. V.; Lopukh, D. B.; Bondarkov, M. D.; Gerdes, Kurt D.; Han, Ana M.

2010-02-10T23:59:59.000Z

214

Joint DOE/NSF Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Joint DOENSF Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing January 16-17, 2003 at LBNL Purpose: Independent peer review of the U.S. LHC Software and Computing projects to continue...

215

Peer Review Policy | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area...

216

Merit Review of BER Activities at the DOE Laboratories | U.S...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Review Policy Grants & Contracts Guidance Laboratory Scientific Focus Area...

217

Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the DOE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the Department of Energy Complex OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......

218

NETL-RUA Annual Review FY2012 DOE/NETL-2012/1579 National Energy Technology Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Review Annual Review FY2012 DOE/NETL-2012/1579 National Energy Technology Laboratory Office of Research and Development 2 NETL-RUA Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views

219

Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

review of the Phase I DP for the West Valley Demonstration Project, Rev. I (Reference 1). DOE submitted responses to the other 38 of the 44 RAIs to NRC on August 13, 2009 (Reference 3). Enclosed are 20 paper copies of the RAI response package along with 20 compact disks. Each compact disk contains an electronic copy of the six RAI responses and two calculationQ t Dr. Keith 1. McConnell-3- September 16, 2009 For Further Information Please note that DOE's RAI responses and the proposed decommissioning approach are based on the preferred alternative in the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement for

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

220

DOE017-0153  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5525 5525 DOE017-0153 ,-.or/ N"( - ./,'-'S MaryBeth Zimmerman 02/14/2001 11:08AM / -- T ' ,44 L - ( _w _1_'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .I f . J To: Kenneth Friedman/EE/DOE@DOE, Peggy Podolak/EE/DOE@DOE, Linda Silverman/EE/DOE@DOE, Ed Wall/EE/DOE@DOE, David RodgerslEE/DOE@DOE, Jerry DionlEE/DOE@DOE, Gail McKinley/EE/DOE@DOE. Lawrence MansuetifEE/DOE@DOE cc: John Sullivan/EE/DOE@DOE. Darrell Beschen/EEIDOE@DOE, Michael York/EE/DOE@DOE, Buddy GarlandlEEIDOE@DOE, Nancy Jefferv/EEIDOE@DOE, Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE. Sam Baldwin/EE/DOE@DOE, IEE-ADAS Subject: FW: NEP Draft outline Directions on NEP Assessment paper. Please read all of this very carefully before proceeding: Product Schedule: * Inputs due from sectors to Planning: COB on Thursday (sorry) o Due from EERE to Policy Office: noon on Friday

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Application Review and Selection Process | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Application Review and Selection Process Application Review and Selection Process Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship (AEF) Program Einstein Fellowship Home Eligibility Benefits Obligations How to Apply Recommender Information Application Review and Selection Process Key Dates Frequently Asked Questions Contact WDTS Home How to Apply Application Review and Selection Process Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application Eligibility and Compliance: To be considered for the program, an applicant must meet all eligibility criteria and submit an application comprising all required materials by the application deadline. To assess eligibility, and prior to the merit review, an initial review of all applications will be conducted to verify applicant eligibility and ensure all the required application materials have been

222

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Presented by Dan Borneo SAND Document 5312608 SAND2012-7453 C...

223

Peer Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Peer Review Policies Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Closed Funding Opportunity...

224

Comparative Review FOA Rules for Proposal Submission | U.S. DOE...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

225

Peer Merit / Review Policies | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

226

Review and Selection of Research Projects | U.S. DOE Office of...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Closed Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Closed Lab Announcements Award Search Peer Merit Review Policies Early Career Research Opportunities in High Energy...

227

Proposal for Reviews | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

For Reviewers: Find your Proposal High Energy Physics (HEP) HEP Home About HEP Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of HEP Funding Opportunities Award Search Early...

228

Readiness Review Training - Member | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Member Member Readiness Review Training - Member November 10, 2010 Readiness Review Member Training at the Idaho National Laboratory Course provides tools and tips to be an effective readiness review team member. Topics include: An understanding of the background behind the Readiness Review Process; Training in the mechanics of performance and reporting of a Readiness Review; Knowledge of current DOE Orders, Directives, and References for the Readiness Review process; Training in Performance-Based Assessment Processes and Official DOE Team Member Readiness Review Training Methods Readiness Review Training - Member More Documents & Publications Readiness Review Training - Team Leader Readiness Review Training - Development of Criteria And Review Approach Documents

229

NETL-RUA Annual Review FY2012 DOE/NETL-2012/1579 National Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NETL-RUA Annual Review FY2012 DOENETL-20121579 National Energy Technology Laboratory Office of Research and Development 2 NETL-RUA Disclaimer This document was prepared as an...

230

Joint DOE/NSF Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Joint DOENSF Status Meeting of U.S. LHC Software and Computing July 8, 2003 at NSF, Arlington, VA Agenda | Documentation | Attendees | Report Purpose: Status review of the U.S....

231

DOE/RL-2010-89 Review Copy October 1, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

investments from different DOE organizations working in basic science, applied research, and site engineering the contaminant cleanup challenges facing the deep vadose zone beneath the Central Plateau of the Hanford Site was the location of Hanford's major uranium fuel reprocessing, waste management, and liquid disposal facilities

Hubbard, Susan

232

May 20,2009, DOE Annual Reports to Congress On Board-Related...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Strengthened Quality Assurance Function II-2 C. DOE Project for Reviewing its Safety Directives II-3 D. Other Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Activities II-4 E. Integrated...

233

DOE OIG Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2003-2008 | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

234

Proceedings of the 1994 DOE/NREL Hydrogen Program Review, April 18--21, 1994, Livermore, California  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy has conducted programs of research and development in hydrogen and related technologies since 1975. The current program, conducted in accordance with the DOE Hydrogen Program Plan FY 1993--FY 1997 published in June 1992, establishes program priorities and guidance for allocating funding. The core program, currently under the Office of Energy Management, supports projects in the areas of hydrogen production, storage, and systems research. At an annual program review, each research project is evaluated by a panel of technical experts for technical quality, progress, and programmatic benefit. This Proceedings of the April 1994 Hydrogen Program Review compiles all research projects supported by the Hydrogen Program during FY 1994. For those people interested in the status of hydrogen technologies, we hope that the Proceedings will serve as a useful technical reference. Individual reports are processed separately.

Not Available

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Microsoft Word - A-14-09-29169 Final DOE Peer Review Ltr.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION BALTIMORE, MD 21235-0001 March 5, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HONORABLE GREGORY H. FRIEDMAN INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUBJECT: Department of Energy Peer Review for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2009 The attached report presents the results of our external quality control review of the Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Office of Audit Services. Your response to the draft report is included as Appendix B. We thank you and your staff for the assistance and cooperation provided during our review. If you have any questions or would like to discuss the report, please call me, or have your staff contact Steven L. Schaeffer, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at

236

RL-721 Document ID Number: REV4 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00081  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 I. Project Title: 300 Area Electrical Service Project, Hanford Site,Richland, Washington II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions ·e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Currently, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) obtains electrical services on the 300 Area of the Hanford Site from the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office {DOE-RL), Mission Support Alliance (MSA} I and Washington Closure Hanford (WCH). PNNL, with concurrence from the Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) and DOE-RL, is proposing to obtain 300 Area electrical services from the City of Richland (COR). The proposed plan for establishing new 12.47 kV power service is to install overhead power

237

Analytical Review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

ANL Performs Independent Review for DOE on the following topics: (1) Systematic analysis--Depends on question asked; (2) Compare technologies and pathways--Examples: (a) fuels, power plant technologies, vehicle materials; (b) Total lifecycle analysis reveals national and global impacts; and (3) Direction of R&D to most fruitful areas.

Frank Stodolsky

2000-04-11T23:59:59.000Z

238

Implementation Plan for the Hawaii Geothermal Project Environmental Impact Statement (DOE Review Draft:)  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that identifies and evaluates the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Hawaii Geothermal Project (HGP), as defined by the State of Hawaii in its 1990 proposal to Congress (DBED 1990). The location of the proposed project is shown in Figure 1.1. The EIS is being prepared pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as implemented by the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) and the DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021), effective May 26, 1992. The State's proposal for the four-phase HGP consists of (1) exploration and testing of the geothermal resource beneath the slopes of the active Kilauea volcano on the Island of Hawaii (Big Island), (2) demonstration of deep-water power cable technology in the Alenuihaha Channel between the Big Island and Mau, (3) verification and characterization of the geothermal resource on the Big Island, and (4) construction and operation of commercial geothermal power production facilities on the Big Island, with overland and submarine transmission of electricity from the Big Island to Oahu and possibly other islands. DOE prepared appropriate NEPA documentation for separate federal actions related to Phase 1 and 2 research projects, which have been completed. This EIS will consider Phases 3 and 4, as well as reasonable alternatives to the HGP. Such alternatives include biomass coal, solar photovoltaic, wind energy, and construction and operation of commercial geothermal power production facilities on the Island of Hawaii (for exclusive use on the Big Island). In addition, the EIs will consider the reasonable alternatives among submarine cable technologies, geothermal extraction, production, and power generating technologies; pollution control technologies; overland and submarine power transmission routes; sites reasonably suited to support project facilities in a safe and environmentally acceptable manner; and non-power generating alternatives, such as conservation and demand-side management.

None

1992-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

239

Literature review of the lifetime of DOE materials: Aging of plastic bonded explosives and the explosives and polymers contained therein  

SciTech Connect

There are concerns about the lifetime of the nation`s stockpile of high explosives (HEs) and their components. The DOE`s Core Surveillance and Enhanced Surveillance programs specifically target degradation of HE, binders, and plastic-bonded explosives (PBXs) for determination of component lifetimes and handling procedures. The principal goal of this project is to identify the decomposition mechanisms of HEs, plasticizers, and plastic polymer binders resulting from exposure to ionizing radiation, heat, and humidity. The primary HEs of concern are 1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene (TATB) and 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetraazocyclooctane (HMX). Hexahydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) is closely related to these two compounds and is also included in the literature review. Both Kel-F 800 and Estane are polymers of interest. A stabilizer, Irganox 1010, and an energetic plasticizer that is a blend of acetaldehyde 2,2-dinitropropyl acetal, are also of interest, but the focus of this report will be on the explosives and polymers. This presents a literature review that provides background on the synthesis, degradation, and techniques to analyze TATB, HMX, RDX, Kel-F 800, Estane, and the PBXs of these compounds. As there are many factors that can influence degradation of materials, the degradation discussion will be divided into sections based on each factor and how it might affect the degradation mechanism. The factors reviewed that influence the degradation of these materials are exposure to heat, UV- and {gamma}-irradiation, and the chemistry of these compounds. The report presents a recently compiled accounting of the available literature. 80 refs., 7 figs.

Burgess, C.E.; Woodyard, J.D. [West Texas A and M Univ., Canyon, TX (United States); Rainwater, K.A. [Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX (United States); Lightfoot, J.M. [Pantex Plant, Amarillo, TX (United States); Richardson, B.R. [Engineered Carbons, Inc., Borger, TX (United States)

1998-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

JGI - Directions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Map to JGI Directions from Directions from key local start points, public transit Home > About Us > Map to JGI UC logo DOE logo Contact Us Credits Disclaimer Access...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

DOE NCSP Review of TRUPACT-II/HalfPACT Fissile Limits  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Nuclear Material & Spent Fuel, EM-21, tasked the CSSG to perform a scoping study to determine the feasibility of increasing the fissile mass loading limits for specified TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT packages and containers. The results of the scoping study may provide insights and technical guidance for establishing fissile mass loading limits at waste generator sites and at the waste repository. The goal is to reduce costs of transporting fissile material to the WIPP from EM's various closure sites. This report documents the results of the scoping study and demonstrates that it is feasible to significantly increase the fissile mass loading limits in the TRUPACT-II and HalfPACT packages and containers. Depending upon the particular payload containers used, the number of shipments to WIPP could be reduced by at least a factor of 2 and as much as a factor of 16 and the number of total payload containers required ''down-hole'' at WIPP could be reduced by at least a factor of 2 and as much as about 6. These cost savings result simply from applying a more realistic criticality analysis model rather than the very conservative, hypothetical, bounding analysis used to support the existing fissile mass loading limits. However, the applications of existing and developmental computational tools, nuclear data, and experiments from the DOE Nuclear Criticality Safety Program have the potential to further reduce transportation and disposal container costs on the order of 7% to 17%. It is suggested that EM proceed with an effort to do the required formal analyses and pursue SARP supplements to take advantage of these savings. The success of these analyses are dependent upon the availability of the majority of the infrastructure supported by the DOE Nuclear Criticality Safety Program as defined in the Five-Year Plan for the program. Finally, it should be noted that these potential cost savings are based only on a criticality safety feasibility study and do not take into account other technical factors from other disciplines that may or may not impact the final approved loadings. The CSSG concurs that the results of this scoping study addresses the tasking statement provided by EM-21.

Goluoglu, S.

2002-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

242

Microsoft Word - MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review 5-29-2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

111 Wilson Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703.558.0400 Fax: 703.558.0401 111 Wilson Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703.558.0400 Fax: 703.558.0401 http://www.manufacturedhousing.org info@mfghome.org U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program Mailstop EE-2J 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585-1585 May 29, 2012 Reference: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed as a part of its implementation of Executive Order

243

RL-721 Document 10 Number: REV3 NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00047  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

47 47 I. Project Title: Routine Shipping and Transportation of Regulated and Non-Regulated Material, Equipment, or Waste On and Off the Hanford Site II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, etc.): Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to ship/transport regulated (radioactive and hazardous chemical) and non-regulated material, equipment, or waste on and off the Hanford Site for treatment, storage, disposal, or recycling. On-site activities occur north of the "Wye" barricade; off-site acti vi ties occur south of the barricade. On-site receiving facilities include, but are not limited to, Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility, solid waste

244

Health impact assessment in Australia: A review and directions for progress  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This article provides an overview of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) within Australia. We discuss the development and current position of HIA and offer some directions for HIA's progression. Since the early 1990s HIA activity in Australia has increased and diversified in application and practice. This article first highlights the emergent streams of HIA practice across environmental, policy and health equity foci, and how these have developed within Australia. The article then provides summaries of current practice provided by each Australian state and territory. We then offer some insight into current issues that require further progression or resolution if HIA is to progress effectively in Australia. This progress rests both on developing broad system support for HIA across government, led by the health sector, and developing system capacity to undertake, commission or review HIAs. We argue that a unified and clear HIA approach is required as a prerequisite to gaining the understanding and support for HIA in the public and private sectors and the wider community.

Harris, Patrick, E-mail: patrick.harris@unsw.edu.a [Research Fellow, Centre for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation, Part of the Centres for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW, Locked Mail Bag 7103, Liverpool BC, NSW 1871 (Australia); Spickett, Jeff, E-mail: J.Spickett@curtin.edu.a [WHO Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health Impact Assessment, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987 Perth, Western Australia (Australia)

2011-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

245

Direct-Drive Inertial Fusion Research at the University of Rochester's Laboratory for Laser Energetics: A Review  

SciTech Connect

This paper reviews the status of direct-drive inertial confinement fusion (ICF) research at the University of Rochester's Laboratory for Laser Energetics (LLE). LLE's goal is to demonstrate direct-drive ignition on the National Ignition Facility (NIF) by 2014. Baseline "all-DT" NIF direct-drive ignition target designs have been developed that have a predicted gain of 45 (1-D) at a NIF drive energy of ~1.6 MJ. Significantly higher gains are calculated for targets that include a DT-wicked foam ablator. This paper also reviews the results of both warm fuel and initial cryogenic-fuel spherical target implosion experiments carried out on the OMEGA UV laser. The results of these experiments and design calculations increase confidence that the NIF direct-drive ICF ignition goal will be achieved.

McCrory, R.L.; Meyerhofer, D.D.; Loucks, S.J.; Skupsky, S.; Bahr, R.E.; Betti, R.; Boehly, T.R.; Craxton, R.S.; Collins, T.J.B.; Delettrez, J.A.; Donaldson, W.R.; Epstein, R.; Fletcher, K.A.; Freeman, C.; Frenje, J.A.; Glebov, V.Yu.; Goncharov, V.N.; Harding, D.R.; Jaanimagi, P.A.; Keck, R.L.; Kelly, J.H.; Kessler, T.J.; Kilkenny, J.D.; Knauer, J.P.; Li, C.K.; Lund, L.D.; Marozas, J.A.; McKenty, P.W.; Marshall, F.J.; Morse, S.F.B.; Padalino, S.; Petrasso, R.D.; Radha, P.B.; Regan, S.P.; Roberts, S.; Sangster, T.C.; Seguin, F.H.; Seka, W.; Smalyuk, V.A.; Soures, J.M.; Stoeckl, C.; Thorp, K.A.; Yaakobi, B.; Zuegel, J.D.

2010-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

246

NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00088 I. Project Title: CH2f"JHill Plateau Remediation Company -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 Number: 10 Number: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM DOE/CX-00088 I. Project Title: CH2f"JHill Plateau Remediation Company - Cleanup Actions, December 2012 to December 2013 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions. e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company (PRC) will be conducting cleanup actions on the Hanford Site in accordance with the categorical exclusion (CX) referenced in 10 CFR 1021, B, CX B6.1 ''Cleanup actions". PRC Projects include all those identified Sections . 3 and J.l4 of the PRC Contract, DE-AC06-08RL14788. Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions, under RCRA, Atomic Energy Act, or other

247

DOE N 472.3, Implementation of Presidential Policy Directive 19, Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Notice implements Presidential Policy Directive 19, Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information, which was issued by President Obama ...

2013-07-10T23:59:59.000Z

248

A Review of the European Union's Directive on Limiting Exposure of Workers to Electromagnetic Fields  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The European Unions Directive on Limiting Exposure of Workers to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) adopts exposure limits based on guidance from the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). This report presents a summary of the draft Directive concerning workplace exposure limits and compliance issues. The summary explains quantitative EMF exposure limits in general and clarifies the Directives use of the terms exposure limit values (ELV) and action ...

2013-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

249

From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass Stories of Discovery & Innovation From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass Enlarge Photo Image by Eric Steen, JBEI Once E. coli have secreted oil, they sequester themselves from the droplets as shown by this optical image, thereby facilitating oil recovery. Currently, biochemical processing of cellulosic biomass requires costly enzymes for sugar liberation. By giving the E. coli the capacity to ferment both cellulose and hemicellulose without the 03.28.11 From Gasoline to Grassoline: Microbes Produce Fuels Directly from Biomass A microbe that can produce an advanced biofuel directly from biomass was developed by researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy's Joint BioEnergy

250

FROM: STEPHEN M. SMITH, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, ME-43 TO: DIRECTIVES POINTS OF CONTACT SUBJECT: DRAFT DOE G 430.1-1X, DOE Cost Estimating Guidefor Program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This is to notify you that the subject draft Guide has been posted in the Draft section of the DOE Directives Portal system for simultaneous use and coordination. The purpose of this Guide is to provide uniform guidance and best practices that describe the methods and procedures used in all programs and projects at DOE for preparing cost estimates. Comments in the Guide are due June 15, 2004. Comments on Guides should not be designated major or suggested, they should be simply labeled as comments. Because Guides provide nonmandatory, supplemental information about acceptable methods for implementing requirements, comments supplied will be considered advisory in nature The following procedures should be followed for the submission of comments:

unknown authors

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

DOE Online  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fermilab's Science Adventures! Fermilab's Science Adventures! DOE Online K-12 Instructional Resources ed.fnal.gov/doe/ The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to helping educate our nation's next generation of scientists. The following resources help teachers integrate the Internet into K-12 classroom instruction. DOE Labs General Instructional Units Online Resources Lesson Plans General References DOE Laboratory and Facility Education Home Pages (www-ed.fnal.gov/doe/doe_labs.html) Direct links for 27 education Websites at DOE national laboratories and facilities. Online Catalog (www-ed.fnal.gov/trc/library) Fermilab's Teacher Resource Center collection of 10,000+ PreK-12 instructional materials in science, mathematics and technology. Materials include tradebooks, curriculum materials, educational

252

A Review of Previous Research in Direct Energy Conversion Fission Reactors  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

From the earliest days of power reactor development, direct energy conversion was an obvious choice to produce high efficiency electric power generation. Directly capturing the energy of the fission fragments produced during nuclear fission avoids the intermediate conversion to thermal energy and the efficiency limitations of classical thermodynamics. Efficiencies of more than 80% are possible, independent of operational temperature. Direct energy conversion fission reactors would possess a number of unique characteristics that would make them very attractive for commercial power generation. These reactors would be modular in design with integral power conversion and operate at low pressures and temperatures. They would operate at high efficiency and produce power well suited for long distance transmission. They would feature large safety margins and passively safe design. Ideally suited to production by advanced manufacturing techniques, direct energy conversion fission reactors could be produced more economically than conventional reactor designs. The history of direct energy conversion can be considered as dating back to 1913 when Moseleyl demonstrated that charged particle emission could be used to buildup a voltage. Soon after the successful operation of a nuclear reactor, E.P. Wigner suggested the use of fission fragments for direct energy conversion. Over a decade after Wigner's suggestion, the first theoretical treatment of the conversion of fission fragment kinetic energy into electrical potential appeared in the literature. Over the ten years that followed, a number of researchers investigated various aspects of fission fragment direct energy conversion. Experiments were performed that validated the basic physics of the concept, but a variety of technical challenges limited the efficiencies that were achieved. Most research in direct energy conversion ceased in the US by the late 1960s. Sporadic interest in the concept appears in the literature until this day, but there have been no recent significant programs to develop the technology.

DUONG,HENRY; POLANSKY,GARY F.; SANDERS,THOMAS L.; SIEGEL,MALCOLM D.

1999-09-22T23:59:59.000Z

253

JGI - Directions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Directions Address DOE Joint Genome Institute 2800 Mitchell Drive Walnut Creek, CA 94598 From Oakland Airport Follow Airport exit signs onto AIRPORT DR. Turn RIGHT onto HEGENBERGER...

254

Application of direct contact heat exchangers to geothermal power production cycles. Project review, December 1, 1974--May 31, 1977  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Work performed on the development of direct contact heat exchanger power cycles for geothermal applications is reviewed. The period covered in the report is from the inception of the project in 1974 through May 31, 1977. Results from a large experimental program on heat exchanger develpment as well as from many analyses of components and cycle performance and economics are given. A number of working fluids and operating conditions have been considered, and no major obstacles for the implementation of the concept have been discovered.

Jacobs, H.R.; Boehm, R.F.; Hansen, A.C.

1977-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

Radiochemistry Student, Postdoc and Invited Speaker Support for New Directions in Isotope Production, Nuclear Forensics and Radiochemistry Supported by the DOE  

SciTech Connect

The Division of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology (NUCL) of the American Chemistry Society (ACS) is sponsoring a symposium entitled "New Directions in Isotope Production, Nuclear Forensics and Radiochemistry Supported by the DOE" at the 240th ACS National Meeting in Boston, MA 22-26 August 2010. Radiochemistry and nuclear science is a critical area of research and funding for which the DOE has provided support over the years. Radiochemistry is undergoing a renaissance in interdisciplinary areas including medicine, materials, nanotechnology, nuclear forensics and energy. For example, interest in nuclear energy is growing in response to global warming. The field of nuclear forensics has grown significantly since 9/11 in response to potential terror threats and homeland security. Radioactive molecular imaging agents and targeted radiotherapy are revolutionizing molecular medicine. The need for radiochemists is growing, critical, and global. The NUCL Division of the ACS has been involved in various areas of radiochemistry and nuclear chemistry for many years, and is the host of the DOE supported Nuclear Chemistry Summer Schools. This Symposium is dedicated to three of the critical areas of nuclear science, namely isotope production, nuclear forensics and radiochemistry. An important facet of this meeting is to provide support for young radiochemistry students/postdoctoral fellows to attend this Symposium as participants and contributors. The funding requested from DOE in this application will be used to provide bursaries for U.S. students/postdoctoral fellows to enable them to participate in this symposium at the 240th ACS National Meeting, and for invited scientists to speak on the important issues in these areas.

Jurisson, Silvia, S.

2011-04-11T23:59:59.000Z

256

DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(DOE) Electricity Advisory Committee (EAC) released three reports prepared for the Secretary of Energy's consideration. These reports review challenges facing DOE and the Nation...

257

Building Technologies Office: 2013 DOE Building Technologies...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: 2013 DOE Building Technologies Office Program Review on Facebook Tweet...

258

Proceedings of the 1997 U.S. DOE Hydrogen Program Review, May 21-23, 1997, Herndon, Virginia  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The research and development supported by the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on near-term transitional strategies involving fossil fuels, and on the exploration of long-term, high-risk, renewable and sustainable concepts.

Not Available

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

DOE G 413.3-9, U.S. Department of Energy Project Review Guide for Capital Asset Projects  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Guide addresses the various project reviews conducted during the life-cycle of a project based on the stage, complexity and duration of a project. This ...

2008-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

260

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-EPRI Energy Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA - Abbas Akhil, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/EPRI Electricity DOE/EPRI Electricity Storage Handbook - in Collaboration with NRECA 28 September 2012 Abbas Akhil Dr. Imre Gyuk and the Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability support is gratefully acknowledged. Electricity Storage Handbook  Objective:  Compile a "how-to" Handbook that presents the technology capabilities, costs, tools and process for implementing electricity storage projects in the US.  Approach:  Publish an open domain DOE Electricity Storage Handbook in partnership with EPRI  Collaboration with NRECA - leverage their knowledge base and reaches the large co-operative utility base  Handbook draws from and updates large body of work of prior work 2 Handbook Chapters  Introduction

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-OE FY12 Electrical DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Presented by Dan Borneo SAND Document 5312608 SAND2012-7453 C Acknowledgements I would like to thank the DOE's Office of Electricity and Dr. Imre Gyuk, Program Manager of the Electrical Energy Storage Program, for their support and funding of the Energy Storage Demonstration Projects. 2 EES Emerging Technology Demonstrations Presentation Outline  Project Overview  Problem Statement  Approach  Current Status  Path Forward - Next Steps  Geographical Representation of Projects  Summary Chart of Projects  Brief Descriptions of Individual Projects  Concluding Remarks 3 EES Demonstrations Project Overview  Problem Statement

262

DOE Coordination Meeting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the formation of a Safety Review Panel, by 2004; * Integrate safety procedures into all DOE project funding procurements. This will ensure that all projects that involve the...

263

DOE/EIS-0075-SA-02: Operational and Engineering Modifications and Regulatory Review Supplemental Analysis of Site-Specific and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements (September 2009)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF SITE-SPECIFIC AND PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS: OPERATIONAL AND ENGINEERING MODIFICATIONS, AND REGULATORY REVIEW U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve 900 Commerce Road East New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 September 2009 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Page 3 of 51 Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office under Contract No. DE-AC96-03PO92207 DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company 850 South Clearview Parkway New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 Page 4 of 51 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6

264

DOE Solar Decathlon: Directions & Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

it into the event parking lot. Screen reader users: click here for plain HTML Go to Google Maps Home Orange County Great Park, Irvine, CA Loading... Map Sat Ter Did you mean a...

265

DOE O 130.1, Budget Formulation  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

DOE N 251.45, dated 5/29/02, extends this directive until 5/1/03. Cancels DOE 5100.3, DOE 5100.4, DOE 5100.5, DOE 5100.6A.

1995-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

266

Gasification advanced research and technology development (AR and TD) cross-cut meeting and review. [US DOE supported  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy gasification advanced research and technology development (AR and TD) cross-cut meeting and review was held June 24 to 26, 1981, at Germantown, Maryland. Forty-eight papers from the proceedings have been entered individually into EDB and ERA. (LTN)

Not Available

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

DOE HANDBOOK  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Handbook on Overseas Assignments Handbook on Overseas Assignments United States Department of Energy Office of Human Capital Management July 2013 2 Introduction This handbook covers all types of Federal employment overseas, including details, both within DOE as well as to other agencies; transfers to approved international organizations; assignments to permanent DOE positions; cost-free experts; and personal services agreements (PSAs). This handbook contains information, guidance, sample service agreements, and related documentation that are to be used to implement the following directives: a. Executive Order 11552, Providing for Details and Transfers of Federal Employees to International Organizations at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11552.html;

268

Does Management Matter? Evidence from India  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DOES MANAGEMENT MATTER? EVIDENCE FROM INDIA Nicholas Bloombadly managed? Our experiment does not directly answer thisworks, imagine a plant that does not record quality defects.

Bloom, Nicholas; Eifert, Benn; Mahajan, Aprajit; McKenzie, David; Roberts, John

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

Frequently Asked Questions for DOE FY 2011 For-Profit Audit Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for DOE FY 2011 For-Profit Audit Guidance for DOE FY 2011 For-Profit Audit Guidance June 2012 Questions Relating to Subrecipient Audit Requirements: Question # 1: We wanted to confirm our understanding based on a review of the Policy Flash 2012-39. If a for-profit subrecipient has expended DOE funding from a local University (i.e. funding not received directly from DOE), our understanding is that the subrecipient would not be subject to the DOE For-Profit audit requirement (DOE Audit Guide). Response # 1: This is correct. Subrecipients are not required to have 10 CFR 600.316 audits. That is, only direct awards from DOE are subject to the DOE Audit Guide and it does not apply to subawards. Question # 2: Consider the following example: XYZ For-Profit Entity has three DOE awards with

270

DOE Policies | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Policies DOE Policies DOE Policies Cyber Security DOE O 205.1B Department of Energy Cyber Security Management (Approved May 16, 2011) Information Management Planning DOE Guide to IT Capital Planning and Investment, September 2010 (pdf) DOE IRM Strategic Plan, FY 2009 - 2011 (pdf) DOE N 203.1, Software Quality Assurance (pdf) DOE G 242.1-1, Forms Management Guide (pdf) DOE O 203.1 Limited Personal Use of Government Office Equipment Including Information Technology (pdf) Information Management Program Order, DOE O 200.1A (pdf) (Access to this document is restricted to DOE employees only) Records Management DOE Directive, O 243.1, Records Management Program (pdf) DOE Directive, O 243.2, Vital Records (pdf) DOE Directive, O 200.2, Information Collection Management Program

271

Solid and hazardous energy wastes: synfuels. I. Review of research activities. [US DOE- and US EPA-sponsored research  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Current chemical and biological research sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on solid, liquid, and gaseous waste streams from coal-conversion and oil-shale technologies is summarized. Brief descriptions, including the objectives, current activities, and future plans (if any), of ongoing projects were obtained from the principal investigators, where possible, or from current publications, progress reports, or scope-of-work sheets from DOE and EPA laboratories. References to publications that have resulted from the various research projects are included where applicable. Additional references to work on hazardous and solid synfuel waste are included in the appendixes, drawn from computerized bibliographic searches of Chemical Abstracts and the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). Appendix I contains information found in the NTIS search from 1974 to 1980, which includes the title, author(s), place of investigation, NTIS ordering number, date of publication, and the actual abstracts. Appendix II contains information found in the Chemical Abstracts search from 1973 to 1980, which includes the title; author(s); journal title, volume, and number; chemical abstracts numbers; descriptors and identifiers based on the given title and/or abstract; and date of publication.

Fradkin, L.; Surles, T.; DeCarlo, V.

1981-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Literature Review for the Baseline Knowledge Assessment of the DOE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Program.  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3/258 3/258 LITERATURE REVIEW FOR THE BASELINE KNOWLEDGE ASSESSMENT OF THE HYDROGEN, FUEL CELLS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Tykey Truett Center for Transportation Analysis Oak Ridge National Laboratory October 2003 Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6073 Managed by UT-BATTELLE, LLC For the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Under contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 Prepared for the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Program Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. CONTENTS ABSTRACT................................................................................................................. iii ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... iv

273

New MEA Materials for Improved Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) Performance, Durability, and Cost - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report James Fletcher (Primary Contact), Philip Cox University of North Florida (UNF) 1 UNF Drive Jacksonville, FL 32224 Phone: (904) 620-1844 Email: jfletche@UNF.edu DOE Managers HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov GO: Katie Randolph Phone: (720) 356-1759 Email: Katie.Randolph@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000475 Subcontractors: * University of Florida, Gainesville, FL * Northeastern University, Boston, MA * Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells, Swindon, UK

274

Completed DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Completed) Completed) Project Number Title Document ID SLM / ORG Author / Phone / Email Status / Review Date P1020-2002REV National Phenomena hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1020-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30) P1066-1999REV Fire Protection and Emergency Services Program and Design Criteria (revision to DOE-STD-1066-99) DOE-STD-1066-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30)

275

The FESAC Subcommittee formed to address the DOE Office of Science charge on proposed scientific user facilities invites community input in the form of short, directed white papers. The  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

user facilities invites community input in the form of short, directed white papers. The instructions for composing these white papers are given below. The final report for this charge must be delivered to DOE the DUE DATE FOR WHITE PAPERS IS THURSDAY, FEB 14. Documents pertaining to this call for white papers

276

JM to Revise DOE G 423.1-1A, Implementation Guide for Use in Developing Technical Safety Requirements  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

As part of the one-year accuracy review of the November 2010 change to the Guide, as required by DOE O 251.1C, Departmental Directives Progrom, Section 7, ...

2013-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

277

Questions for UCNI Reviewing Officials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

What guidance can a Reviewing Official use, and how does a Reviewing Official get copies of guidance?

278

DOE F  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

420.2 420.2 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Records Management Division, IM-11 GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20585; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), Washington, DC 20503. U.S. Department of Energy Personal Property Loan Agreement DOE-PMR 109-1.5103 1. CONTROL

279

Does Search-facilitating Technology Improve the Transparency of Financial Reporting?" The Accounting Review 79(3  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ABSTRACT: XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) is an emerging technology that facilitates directed searches and simultaneous presentation of related financial statement and footnote information. We investigate whether using an XBRL-enhanced search engine helps nonprofessional financial statement users acquire and integrate related financial information when making an investment decision. We conduct our investigation in the context of recognition versus disclosure of stock option compensation. Our results reveal that many users do not access the technology, but those who do use it are better able to acquire and integrate information. Specifically, we find that when stock option accounting varies between firms, the use of an XBRL-enhanced search engine increases the likelihood that individuals acquire information about stock option compensation disclosed in the footnotes. We also find that XBRL helps individuals integrate the implications of this information, resulting in different investment decisions between individuals who use and do not use the search engine. Our results suggest that search-facilitating technologies, such as XBRL, aid financial statement users by improving the transparency of firms financial statement information and managers

Frank D. Hodge; Jane Jollineau Kennedy; Laureen A. Maines

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Final Report for DOE Grant DE-FG02-06ER64160 Retrieval of Cloud Properties and Direct Testing of Cloud and Radiation Parameterizations using ARM Observations.  

SciTech Connect

This report briefly summaries the work performed at KNMI under DOE Grant DE-FG02-06ER64160 which, in turn was conducted in support of DOE Grant DE-FG02-90ER61071 lead by E. Clothieux of Penn. State U. The specific work at KNMI revolved around the development and application of the EarthCARE simulator to ground-based multi-sensor simulations.

Donovan, David Patrick [KNMI

2013-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Direct Carbon Conversion: Review of Production and Electrochemical Conversion of Reactive Carbons, Economics and Potential Impact on the Carbon Cycle  

SciTech Connect

Concerns over global warning have motivated the search for more efficient technologies for electric power generation from fossil fuels. Today, 90% of electric power is produced from coal, petroleum or natural gas. Higher efficiency reduces the carbon dioxide emissions per unit of electric energy. Exercising an option of deep geologic or ocean sequestration for the CO{sub 2} byproduct would reduce emissions further and partially forestall global warming. We introduce an innovative concept for conversion of fossil fuels to electricity at efficiencies in the range of 70-85% (based on standard enthalpy of the combustion reaction). These levels exceed the performance of common utility plants by up to a factor of two. These levels are also in excess of the efficiencies of combined cycle plants and of advanced fuel cells now operated on the pilot scale. The core of the concept is direct carbon conversion a process that is similar to that a fuel cell but differs in that synthesized forms of carbon, not hydrogen, are used as fuel. The cell sustains the reaction, C + O{sub 2} = CO{sub 2} (E {approx} 1.0 V, T = 800 C). The fuel is in the form of fine particulates ({approx}100 nm) distributed by entrainment in a flow of CO{sub 2} to the cells to form a slurry of carbon in the melt. The byproduct stream of CO{sub 2} is pure. It affords the option of sequestration without additional separation costs, or can be reused in secondary oil or gas recovery. Our experimental program has discovered carbon materials with orders of magnitude spreads in anode reactivity reflected in cell power density. One class of materials yields energy at about 1 kW/m{sup 2} sufficiently high to make practical the use of the cell in electric utility applications. The carbons used in such cells are highly disordered on the nanometer scale (2-30 nm), relative to graphite. Such disordered or turbostratic carbons can be produced by controlled pyrolysis (thermal decomposition) of hydrocarbons extracted from coal, petroleum or natural gas. For coal and lignite, such hydrocarbons may be produced by cyclic hydrogenation (hydropyrolysis), with the recycle of the hydrogen intermediate following pyrolysis. Starting with common CH{sub x} feedstock for carbon black manufacture, the ash entrained into the carbon (<0.03%) does not jeopardize cell life or enter into the economic estimates for power generation. The value of carbon (relative to hydrogen) as an electrochemical fuel derives from thermodynamic aspects of the C/O{sub 2} reaction. First, the entropy change of the C/O{sub 2} reaction is nearly zero, allowing theoretical efficiencies ({Delta}G(T)/{Delta}H{sub i298}) of 100% (cf. H{sub 2}/O{sub 2} theoretical efficiency of 70%). Second, the thermodynamic activity of the carbon fuel and the CO{sub 2} product are spatially and temporally invariant. This allows 100% utilization of the carbon fuel in single pass (cf. hydrogen utilizations of 75-85%). The carbodmelt slurry is non-explosive at operating temperatures. The total energy efficiency for the C/O{sub 2} is roughly 80% for cell operation at practical rates. In summary, what gives this route its fundamental advantage in energy conversion is that it derives the greatest possible fraction of energy of the fossil resource from an electrochemical reaction (C+O{sub 2} = CO{sub 2}) that is comparatively simple to operate at efficiencies of 80%, in a single-pass cell configuration without bottoming turbine cycles.

Cooper, J F; Cherepy, N; Upadhye, R; Pasternak, A; Steinberg, M

2000-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

282

Safety and Security Directives Reform  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reforming a "Mountain" of Policy Reforming a "Mountain" of Policy Beginning with his confirmation hearings in January 2009, Energy Secretary Steven Chu challenged the Department of Energy to take a fresh look at how we conduct business. This challenge provided the opportunity for DOE to put in place the most effective and efficient strategies to accomplish the Department's missions safely and securely. In response to the Secretary's challenge and building on the results of Deputy Secretary Poneman's Safety and Security Reform studies, the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) broadened its directives review activities during 2009. By November 2009 HSS had initiated a disciplined review of all health, safety, and security directives, which included a systematic review of the Department's safety and security regulatory model.

283

DOE O 481.1A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

All Departmental Elements Office of Management and Administration U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 01-03-01 Sunset Review: 01-03-03 Expires: 01-03-05 SUBJECT: WORK FOR OTHERS (NON-DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FUNDED WORK) 1. OBJECTIVES. Work for Others (WFO) is the performance of work for non-Department of Energy (DOE) entities by DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and/or their respective contractor personnel or the use of DOE/NNSA facilities that is not directly funded by DOE appropriations. WFO has the following objectives. a. To provide assistance to other Federal agencies and non-Federal entities in accomplishing goals that may otherwise be unattainable and to avoid the possible duplication of effort at Federal facilities.

284

DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

These reports review challenges facing DOE and the Nation in many important electricity areas, and include recommendations for policy and program initiatives. They address...

285

2012 CERTS LAAR Program Peer Review - Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads - Anna Scaglioni, UC Davis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Integration and Extension of Direct Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads Anna Scaglione, UC Davis GRA: Mahnoosh Alizadeh Project objective  Invent methods to "store" load demand for * Real-time "generation following" * Integration of load reserves as dispatchable assets in the Energy Market  Architecture for virtual "reserves" (queues) of electrical load demand * Watts to Job mapping (analysis)  Captures digitally the service requirements - Equal service type = Equal queue * Job to Watts mapping (synthesis)  Allows to optimally schedule the load profile Major technical accomplishments  Centralized model: Digital Direct Load Scheduling (DDLS) - Year 1-Year 2

286

DOE Seeks Further Public Input on How Best To Streamline Existing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Further Public Input on How Best To Streamline Existing Further Public Input on How Best To Streamline Existing Regulations DOE Seeks Further Public Input on How Best To Streamline Existing Regulations December 7, 2011 - 12:34pm Addthis The Department of Energy (DOE) has announced a further step to implementing the President's Executive Order on Improving Regulatory Review. The Executive Order directs federal agencies to review existing regulations and determine whether they are still necessary and crafted effectively to solve current problems. Engaging the public in an open, transparent process is a crucial step in DOE's regulatory review process. Because public comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) issued in January were important in the development of DOE's plan for retrospective regulatory review, DOE issued a second RFI this week asking the public how

287

Structure Functions in Deep Inelastic Lepton Scattering: Data from DOE laboratory experiments as compiled in data reviews by the Durham High Energy Physics Database Group  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

Gehrmann, Roberts, and Whalley in their 1999 paper, A Compilation of Structure Functions in Deep Inelastic Scattering, published in volume 25 of Journal of Physics G (Nuclear and Particle Physics) note that these data will continue to be relevant to the next generation of hadron colliders. They present data on the unpolarized structure functions F2 and xF3, R D ._L=_T /, the virtual photon asymmetries A1 and A2 and the polarized structure functions g1 and g2, from deep inelastic lepton scattering off protons, deuterium and nuclei. Data are presented in both tabular and graphical format and include predictions based on the MRST98 and CTEQ4 parton distribution functions as well. The data gathered from the relevant collaborations at DOE's Fermilab, SLAC, and JLAB are available, and so are data from related collaborations based at CERN and DESY. The Durham High Energy Physics (HEP) Database Group makes these data, extracted from papers and data reviews, available in one place in an easy-to-access format. These data are also include in the Durham HEP Reaction Data Database which can be searched at http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/spires/hepdata/reac.html

Gehrmann, T; Roberts, R. G.; Whalley, M. R.; Durham HEP Database Group

288

DOE | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE DOE Home DOE Wind Vision Community Description: The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report, and to develop a renewed vision for U.S. wind power research, development, and deployment. Included in this effort will be: community DOE forum Wind Graham7781's picture Submitted by Graham7781(1992) Super contributor 26 April, 2013 - 11:05 OpenEI Showcased in Geothermal Exploration Best Practices Workshop DOE geothermal GTO OpenEI This week, Denver hosted the US DOE Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) 2013 Peer Review. The purpose of the peer review is to offer geothermal

289

Updated Skill Set with Annual Skill Set Model Review and VISION Training completion. Revision does not impact MGTF-002 Template 08_1014. Added EOTA IT Security Course and Exam  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

330 330 Reformatted and reorganized entire document. Broke down by position and bumped against Position Descriptions for accuracy, updated names of documents and made consistent throughout 09_0623 Updated Skill Set with Annual Skill Set Model Review and VISION Training completion. Revision does not impact MGTF-002 Template 08_1014. Added EOTA IT Security Course and Exam to process section. 09_0807 Updated Skill Set with Annual Skill Set Model Review. Added Required DOE contractor Training (IT Security, FEOSH & Cyber Security). Added EOTA IT Security Course and Exam to process section. 08_1014 Removed employee no longer with EOTA. MGTP-004, Employee Satisfaction Process no longer active. 08_0829 Annual Skill Set Model Review completed and documented for all EOTA staff. Additional lines added for future training items.

290

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index is a one-stop solution providing you with DOE's Guidance and Requirements documents combined into one file for easy download and use. The compressed (.zip) file contains all of these documents in their optimized and machine-readable format. The file also contains a "search index" that can be used to search for keywords and phrases in all the documents from one search form, without the need to install a separate program. Please direct any questions, comments, or feedback to: John.Jediny@hq.doe.gov Review the documents included in the Search Index as a List or Table NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index.zip

291

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index is a one-stop solution providing you with DOE's Guidance and Requirements documents combined into one file for easy download and use. The compressed (.zip) file contains all of these documents in their optimized and machine-readable format. The file also contains a "search index" that can be used to search for keywords and phrases in all the documents from one search form, without the need to install a separate program. Please direct any questions, comments, or feedback to: John.Jediny@hq.doe.gov Review the documents included in the Search Index as a List or Table NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index.zip

292

DOE Information Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Information Center DOE Information Center The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Center provides citizens a consolidated facility to obtain information and records related to the DOE's various programs in Oak Ridge and abroad. Employees at the DOE Information Center are available to assist with your requests and searches from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through Friday, except for federal holidays. Requests Documents can be requested in person or by telephone, email, or fax. Reproduction Please allow DOE Information Center staff adequate time to reproduce documents. Some material requires special handling, security reviews, etc. Delivery Unless special arrangements have been made with DOE Information Center staff, documents should be picked up during normal business hours.

293

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, Contents, 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 1, 2009 iii 1. The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) The DOE Directives System includes a hierarchy of documents that describe how the Department...

294

JGI - DOE Mission Relevance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

User Programs User Programs Project Management Office Community Science Program Emerging Technologies Opportunity Program Technology Development Pilot Program Genomic Encyc. of Bacteria and Archaea MyJGI: Information for Collaborators DOE Mission Relevance CSP | Overview | How to Propose a Project | Review Process | DOE Relevance Proposal Schedule | FAQ The Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI) is managed by the Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research (OBER) to produce high-throughput DNA sequencing and analysis in support of its missions in alternative energy, global carbon cycling, and biogeochemistry. These areas mirror DOE and national priorities to develop abundant sources of clean energy, to control greenhouse gas accumulation in

295

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Superconducting Magnet ESS with Direct Power Electronics Interface - V.R. Ramanan, ABB  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

© ABB Group © ABB Group October 5, 2012 | Slide 1 Superconducting Magnet Energy Storage System with Direct Power Electronics Interface Project Goal  Competitive, fast response, grid-scale MWh superconducting magnet energy storage (SMES) system  Demonstrated through a small scale prototype, (20 kW, 2.5 MJ) and direct connection power electronics converter (with Si-based devices) V.R. Ramanan, ABB US Corporrate Research Center GRIDS SMES SYSTEM SMES Coil MV Feeder Power Converter ABB Brookhaven NL 2G HTS Wire SuperPower MV/LV MV/LV MV/LV HV/MV Wind Park Solar Park Transmission Line Converter & System Design/Prototyping LV Loads University of Houston ABB Project Update  Issues related to SMES system integration being addressed  Project slightly behind schedule; on budget

296

Planning and Conducting Readiness Reviews  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3006-2010 3006-2010 ________________________ Superseding DOE-STD-3006-2000 June 2000 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCTING READINESS REVIEWS U.S. Department of Energy AREA OPER Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3006-YR i CONTENTS FOREWORD................................................................................................................................. 1

297

A technical review of non-destructive assay research for the characterization of spent nuclear fuel assemblies being conducted under the US DOE NGSI  

SciTech Connect

There is a growing belief that expansion of nuclear energy generation will be needed in the coming decades as part of a mixed supply chain to meet global energy demand. At stake is the health of the economic engine that delivers human prosperity. As a consequence renewed interest is being paid to the safe management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and the plutonium it contains. In addition to being an economically valuable resource because it can be used to construct explosive devices, Pu must be placed on an inventory and handled securely. A multiinstitutional team of diverse specialists has been assembled under a project funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Next Generation Safeguards Initiative (NGSI) to address ways to nondestructively quantify the plutonium content of spent nuclear fuel assemblies, and to also detect the potential diversion of pins from those assemblies. Studies are underway using mostly Monte Carlo tools to assess the feasibility, individual and collective performance capability of some fourteen nondestructive assay methods. Some of the methods are familiar but are being applied in a new way against a challenging target which is being represented with a higher degree of realism in simulation space than has been done before, while other methods are novel. In this work we provide a brief review of the techniques being studied and highlight the main achievements to date. We also draw attention to the deficiencies identified in for example modeling capability and available basic nuclear data. We conclude that this is an exciting time to be working in the NDA field and that much work, both fundamental and applied, remains ahead if we are to advance the state of the practice to meet the challenges posed to domestic and international safeguards by the expansion of nuclear energy together with the emergence of alternative fuel cycles.

Croft, Stephen [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Tobin, Stephen J [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2010-12-06T23:59:59.000Z

298

DOE-STD-1082-94 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE requirements are identified in DOE Rules, Orders, Notices, Immediate Action Directives, and Manuals (hereinafter referred to as DOE requirements documents). Preparation,...

299

Delegating to a Powerless Intermediary: Does It Reduce Punishment?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Powerless Intermediary: Does it Reduce Punishment? ? Reginefact that the dictator does not directly determine the ?nala way of avoiding punishment does not signi?cantly increase

Grossman, Zachary; Oexl, Regine

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-STD-3006-2000 DOE-STD-3006-2000 June 2000 Superseding DOE-STD-3006-95 November 1995 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA OPER Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823 Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3006-2000 iii PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Direct production of hydrogen and aromatics from methane or natural gas: Review of recent U.S. patents  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Since the year 2000, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has granted a dozen patents for inventions related to methane dehydroaromatization processes. One of them was granted to UOP LLC (Des Plaines). It relates to a catalyst composition and preparation method. Two patents were granted to Conoco Phillips Company (Houston, TX). One was aimed at securing a process and operating conditions for methane aromatization. The other was aimed at securing a process that may be integrated with separation of wellhead fluids and blending of the aromatics produced from the gas with the crude. Nine patents were granted to ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. (Houston, TX). Most of these were aimed at securing a dehydroaromatization process where methane-containing feedstock moves counter currently to a particulate catalyst. The coked catalyst is heated or regenerated either in the reactor, by cyclic operation, or in annex equipment, and returned to the reactor. The reactor effluent stream may be separated in its main components and used or recycled as needed. A brief summary of those inventions is presented in this review.

Lucia M. Petkovic; Daniel M. Ginosar

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

DOE M 140.1-1B  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

140.1-1B 140.1-1B 7-26-05 E R R A T A S H E E T This Errata Sheet transmits an administrative change to DOE M 140.1-1B, Interface with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, dated 3-30-01. An "Expiration Date" was inadvertently placed on DOE M 140.1-1B. In accordance with DOE M 251.1A, Directives of interest to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) are not required to have an expiration date. Since this Directive is of interest to the DNFSB, the expiration date has been removed. This Errata Sheet must remain with DOE M 140.1-1B. DOE M 140.1-1B Approved: 3-30-01 Sunset Review: 3-30-03 INTERFACE WITH THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of the Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

303

Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Criteria, Review and Approach Document DNFSB Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board DOE U.S. Department of Energy DSA Documented Safety Analysis EM DOE Office of Environmental...

304

DOE Reg. Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 4, 2012 January 4, 2012 Page 1 January 4, 2012 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI had submitted comments on March 21, 2011 in response to the previous Request for Information (RFI) issued by DOE in February of 2011. We appreciate DOE's commitment to maintaining a plan for regular, periodic review of its existing regulations and reporting

305

For DOE Programs | Scientific and Technical Information Program  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Programs DOE Programs Print page Print page Email page Email page DOE Programs fund research and other scientific endeavors. For those activities where the STI is not submitted by National Labs, major sites, or through financial assistance awards, it should be submitted by the DOE Program. Normally, these STI submissions will be submitted via E-Link AN 241.1. Steps Required to Provide STI to DOE Apply for E-Link Access. Questions about E-Link should be directed to OSTI @ 865-576-1333 Identify STI product type to determine whether to provide announcement notice only applicable to copyrighted STI or both announcement notice and full-text document for all full-text documents. Review full-text document for sensitivities listed on AN 241.1 under "Distribution/Access Limitations" and protected personally identifiable

306

DOE G 414  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

307

DOE G 414  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

308

DOE-STD-1104-2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE-STD-1104-2009: Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis and Safety Design Basis Documents Superseding DOE-STD-1104-96 This Standard describes a framework and criteria for reviewing safety basis documents that will support DOE approval of the documents as required by 10 CFR 830 Subpart B and DOE-STD-1189-2008 (as invoked by DOE Order 413.3A, Chg 1) including preparation of SERs and SVRs for nuclear facilities.

309

JGI - CSP Review Process & Contract Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review Process and Contract Documents CSP | Overview | How to Propose a Project | Review Process | DOE Relevance Proposal Schedule | FAQ Review Process Full proposals will go...

310

DOE Patents Database - Widget  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Get the DOepatents Widget... Get the DOepatents Widget... Download the DOepatents widget to find DOE patent data, read news about DOE inventions, and browse the most-viewed patents. You may download and install this widget using the html inclusion code. Get the DOepatents widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info) Widget Features Search: Find patent information resulting from DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) dating from the 1940s to today. Most Viewed: Browse the most frequently viewed patent records. News: Read about highlighted DOE inventions and inventors. Featured: View recently issued patents and patents owned exclusively by DOE. Contact: Send comments or questions about this collection. XML: Link directly to the DOepatents XML data service, with help and

311

Office of Nuclear Safety - Directives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nuclear and Facility Safety Directives Nuclear and Facility Safety Directives The HSS Office of Nuclear Safety is the responsible office for the development, interpretation, and revision of the following Department of Energy (DOE) directives. Go to DOE's Directives Web Page to view these directives. DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program DOE O 252.1A promotes DOE's use of Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCS) as the primary method for application of technical standards and establishes and manages the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) including technical standards development, information, activities, issues, and interactions. HS-30 Contact: Jeff Feit DOE Policy (P) 420.1, Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy DOE P 420.1, documents the Department's nuclear safety policy to design, construct, operate, and decommission its nuclear facilities in a manner that ensures adequate protection of workers, the public, and the environment.

312

Revision of DOE Manual 460.2-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 TEC/WG 1 Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual DOE Writing Team March 2006 TEC/WG 2 Proposed Revision Timeline Proposed Revision Timeline Complete new draft of Manual 2/06 Draft Manual provided to Manual Review Topic Group for review & comment 3/14/06 Comments due from Topic Group 5/01/06 Final draft Manual 7/06 Comment resolution (thru conference calls with Topic Group, as needed) 6/06 March 2006 TEC/WG 3 Proposed Timeline (contd.) Proposed Timeline (contd.) Manual is submitted into the formal Directives process 9/06 Manual reissued 12/06 March 2006 TEC/WG 4 Major Changes Made to the Manual Major Changes Made to the Manual * Clarification/update of information relative

313

Statement from DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management James Rispoli on the National Academy of Public Administration's Management Review of DOE's Office of Environmental...

314

DOE | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE DOE Dataset Summary Description Source EERE Date Released September 27th, 2010 (4 years ago) Date Updated September 27th, 2010 (4 years ago) Keywords buildings commercial buildings DOE energy use Data application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon New construction (xlsx, 277.8 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon Post-1980 construction (in or after 1980) (xlsx, 277.9 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon Pre-1980 construction (xlsx, 253 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) Comment Rate this dataset Usefulness of the metadata

315

DOE standard: Radiological control  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

GUIDANCE TO COMPLETING THE SELF-DIRECTED RBSM INTERVIEW FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TO COMPLETING THE SELF-DIRECTED RBSM TO COMPLETING THE SELF-DIRECTED RBSM INTERVIEW FORM The RBSM Process This guidance package is meant to be a companion piece for the self-directed RBSM Interview Form and describes the basic mechanics of the RBSM process. Examples are provided to clarify the review process and provide the reviewer with some of the rationale behind the questions that are asked. This companion piece does not emulate the exact order of the review process interview form but rather, attempts to address the major pathways that may be followed along the way to selecting a given disposition category. The RBSM review process is outlined in a detailed flow chart which is subdivided into various sections. The first section of the flow chart initially identifies the activity to be evaluated. The remaining sections include a

317

Operational Readiness Reviews  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Readiness Reviews Readiness Reviews Home Applicable Directives, Standards, & Handbooks Start Up Notifications, Plan of Actions, and Implementation Plans Functional Area CRADS...

318

Restrospective Regulatory Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On January 18, 2011, President Obama issued Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, which directs federal agencies, among other things, to review existing regulations and...

319

DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Removes DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor Peña sends a message to DOE facilities nationwide INSIDE 2 Accelerator Rx 4 FermiKids 6 Spring at Fermilab Photos courtesy of Brookhaven National Laboratory by Judy Jackson, Office of Public Affairs Secretary of Energy Federico Peña announced on Thursday, May 1, that the Department of Energy would immediately terminate the current management contract with Associated Universities, Inc. at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York. Peña said that he made the decision after receiving the results of a laboratory safety management review conducted by the independent oversight arm of DOE's Office of Environment, Safety and Health. In addition, the Secretary said he found unacceptable "the continued on page 8 Volume 20 Friday, May 16, 1997

320

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pantex Site Office's Compliance with Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Assessment Methodologies and Approach ........................................................................................... 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities, June 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Pantex Site Office's Compliance with Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Assessment Methodologies and Approach ........................................................................................... 1

322

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Peer Review - Sept, 2007 Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5 kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting Magnetic Bearing - Phase III...

323

DOE Solar Decathlon: Directions and Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Transportation Visit the U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon 2013 at the Orange Country Great Park in Irvine, California The Great Park is situated in the geographic...

324

NERSC/DOE BER Requirements Workshop Participants  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for Biological and Environmental Research: Target 2017 A Joint ASCR BER NERSC Requirements Review September 11-12, 2012 DOE NERSC Participants and Organizers Name...

325

Hadronic Total Cross Sections (R) in E+E- Interactions: Data from DOE laboratory experiments as compiled in data reviews by the Durham High Energy Physics Database Group  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

The Durham High Energy Physics (HEP) Database Group makes these data, extracted from papers and data reviews, available in one place in an easy-to-access format. The data are also included in the Durham HEP Reaction Data Database, which can be searched at http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/spires/hepdata/reac.html.

Whalley, M. R.

326

CRAD, Review of Safety Basis Development - January 31, 2013 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 31, 2013 January 31, 2013 CRAD, Review of Safety Basis Development - January 31, 2013 January 31, 2013 Review of Safety Basis Development for the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility - Inspection Criteria, Approach, and Lines of Inquiry (HSS CRAD 45-57, Rev. 0) The review will consider selected aspects of the development of safety basis for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) to assess the extent to which safety is integrated into the design of the SWPF in accordance with DOE directives; in particular, DOE Order 420.1 B, DOE-STD-1189, and DOE-STD3009. The review will focus on a few selected safety systems, such as the Process Vessel Ventilation System (PVVS) and the Air Dilution System (ADS), and associated supporting/interfacing systems. CRAD, Review of Safety Basis Development - January 31, 2013

327

EFCOG / DOE Electrical Safety  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

&D Decontamination and Decommissioning dc direct current DOE Department of Energy EFCOG Energy Facility Contractors Purpose: This tool is intended to determine the severity of an electrical energy event based reportability. Scope: This tool establishes a standardized approach for tracking and trending electrical energy

328

Readiness Review Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review Program Review Program FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: DOE/NNSA Headquarters and Field organizations and their contractors responsible for the startup and operation of nuclear facilities have defined and implemented contractual requirements to manage, evaluate, and approve the startup and restart of nuclear facilities and activities. REQUIREMENTS:  DOE Order 425.1C, Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities  DOE P 450.4, Safety Management System Policy  DOE/NNSA Safety Management Functions, Responsibilities and Authorities Manual Guidance:  DOE-STD-3006-2000, Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness ReviewsDOE-HDBK- 3012-2003, Operational Readiness Review Team Leaders Handbook  DOE G 450.4-1B, Integrated Safety Management System Guide

329

Notice of public meeting and additional opportunity for public review and comment for the WAPA Eastern Plains Transmission Project (DOE/EIS-0390)(06/04/07)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

792 Federal Register 792 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 106 / Monday, June 4, 2007 / Notices Training Activity Support System (STASS), Navy Personnel Command, Application for Tuition, the Marine Corps and Coast Guard personnel systems extracts, Assistance Form (NAVMC 10883), education counselors, educational institutions, Tuition Assistance Authorization Form (NAVEDTRA 1560/5), and Academic contractor. EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: None. [FR Doc. E7-10683 Filed 6-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork

330

Review of the Implementation Verification Rev iew Processes at...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review and Approach Document CSTF Concentration, Storage and Transfer Facilities DOE Department of Energy DOE-SR DOE Savannah River Operations Office DSA Documented Safety...

331

Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE Facilities, April 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Oversight Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Facilities May 2011 Late Fall 2012 April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Overall Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 3

332

Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE Facilities, April 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oversight Oversight Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Facilities May 2011 Late Fall 2012 April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Overall Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 3

333

DOE 13563 and ICR Report | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3563 and ICR Report DOE 13563 and ICR Report DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report, January 14, 2013 DOE 13563 and ICR Report 21513 FINAL.pdf More Documents &...

334

DOE-2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

standards in the U.S. and other countries. DOE-2 is also the basis of numerous handbooks on energy-efficient buildings and building components. Many design and consulting...

335

Rediness Review Team Member Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEMBER MEMBER TRAINING Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Michael Hillman DOE HQ - HSS Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Dan M. Stover, PE Technical And Professional Services, Inc. 47 James Habersham Blvd Beaufort, SC 29906 Official DOE Team Member Readiness Review Training November 8-9, 2010 Module 1 Module 1 READINESS REVIEW TEAM MEMBER TRAINING Introduction & Course Conduct Readiness Review Readiness Review Official DOE Team Member Readiness Review Training November 2010 TRAINING READINESS REVIEW TEAM MEMBER TRAINING Purpose of this Course Provide Prospective Readiness Review Team members h with: * An understanding of the background behind the Readiness Review Process; e e ocess; * Training in the mechanics of performance and reporting of

336

National Security Information Classification Guidance Fundamental Review, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security Security Information Fundamental Classification Guidance Review Report to the Information Security Oversight Office June 2012 United States Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Department of Energy | June 2012 National Security Information Fundamental Classification Guidance Review | Page iii Executive Summary Section 1.9 of Executive Order (E.O.) 13526, Classified National Security Information, dated December 29, 2009, directs agency heads to complete a comprehensive review of agency classification guides to ensure they reflect current circumstances and to identify classified information that no longer requires protection and can be declassified. To meet this requirement, the Department of Energy (DOE), under the direction of the Senior Agency Official, devoted

337

NETL: Methane Hydrates - DOE/NETL Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- Methane Hydrate Research - Geoscience Evaluations and Field Studies Last Reviewed 3/18/2013 - Methane Hydrate Research - Geoscience Evaluations and Field Studies Last Reviewed 3/18/2013 Project Goals The primary goals of the DOE/NETL Natural Gas Hydrate Field Studies (NGHFS) project are: Conduct field-based studies that advance the ability to predict, detect, characterize, and understand distribution of and controls on natural gas hydrate occurrences. Analyze geologic, geochemical, and microbiologic data for indications of past and current changes to the stability of natural gas hydrate in marine settings. Develop links between the U.S. Gas Hydrate Program and international R&D efforts through direct participation in international field programs and workshops. Evaluate the potential role natural gas hydrates may play in the global carbon cycle through analysis of modern and paleo-natural gas

338

DOE-STD-3020-97; DOE Standard Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POUND POUND DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE NE F3-45 January 1987 DOE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HEPA FILTERS USED BY DOE CONTRACTORS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DE97000782 DOE-STD-3020-97 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy standard supersedes DOE NE F3-45 and is approved for use by

339

DOE-STD-3022-98; DOE Standard DOE HEPA Filter Test Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22-98 22-98 May 1998 Superseding DOE NE F 3-42 January 1987 DOE STANDARD DOE HEPA FILTER TEST PROGRAM U.S. Department of Energy FSC 4460 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Order No. DE98001294 DOE-STD-3022-98 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard is approved for use by all DOE components and contractors.

340

Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events, September 2011 Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events, September 2011 Following the March 2011 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the Department of Energy (DOE) took several actions to review the safety of its nuclear facilities. These actions focused on learning how DOE can better prepare to manage potential beyond design basis events. A summary of these actions and the resulting insights, and recommended opportunities and actions to improve nuclear safety at DOE> are included in the attached report. I have directed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

DOE - Office of Legacy Management  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Mound Site Five-Year Review Survey Mound Site Five-Year Review Survey Section 121 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), requires that remedial actions which result in any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site be subject to a five-year review. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently conducting the third five-year review at the Mound, Ohio, Site. The purpose of a five-year review is to ensure that the remedies that were implemented at the site continue to protect human health and the environment. Community involvement is an integral part of the Mound Site and the CERCLA five-year review process. DOE invites your input or comments about the

342

DOE F 5631  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(07/03) OFFICIAL USE ONLY OMB Control No. 1910-5122 (07/03) OFFICIAL USE ONLY OMB Control No. 1910-5122 Replaces DOE F 5631.35 A ll other editions obsolete. 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HUMAN RELIABILITY PROGRAM (HRP) CERTIFICATION NAME: INITIAL [ ] ANNUAL [ ] POSITION:_____________________________ DRUG TESTING DATE:___________________ EMPLOYER:___________________________ ALCOHOL TESTING DATE:_______________ ANNIVERSARY/DUE DATE:_____________ TRAINING COMPLETION DATE:__________ COUNTERINTELLIGENCE EVALUATION APPROVAL DATE: __________________________________ SECTION A - SUPERVISORY REVIEW I have reviewed all available information regarding this individual and have no reason to believe that this individual may represent a security or safety concern. (If you cannot make such an affirmation, then do not sign here and

343

Quality Assurance: Policy and Directives  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Policy and Directives The Office of Quality Assurance is responsible for DOE's quality assurance (QA) policy and requirements, and for providing assistance with QA implementation....

344

Facility Representatives, DOE-STD-1063-2011, Change Notice 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Industry Documents ... 3 2.1.1 DOE Directives (Polices, Orders, Manuals, Guides) ... 3 2.1.2 DOE...

345

www.netl.doe.gov Impact of Load Following on Power Plant Cost and Performance: Literature Review and Industry Interviews Prepared By  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed therein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United

Jim Black; Paul Myles; Steve Herron

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

Two-Photon Reactions Leading to Hadron Final States: Data from DOE laboratory experiments as compiled in data reviews by the Durham High Energy Physics Database Group  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

The data gathered from the relevant collaborations at DOEs SLAC are available, and so are data from related collaborations based at CERN, DESY, KEK, NOVO, ORSAY, and CORNELL University. The Durham High Energy Physics (HEP) Database Group makes these data, extracted from papers and data reviews, available in one place in an easy-to-access format. These data are also included in the Durham HEP Reaction Data Database which can be searched at http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/spires/hepdata/reac.html.

Whalley, M. R.

347

DOE/EIS-0380  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 FISCAL YEAR 2011 MITIGATION ACTION PLAN ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE 2008 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APRIL 2012 LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE 3747 West Jemez Road, MS A-316 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 DISCLAIMER: This document was prepared by Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS) in their role as management and operations (M&O) contractor for the Los Alamos National Laboratory, under contract to DOE/NNSA (Contract Number DE-AC52-06NA25396). DOE/NNSA LASO has reviewed this document for content and accuracy. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Officer for DOE/NNSA LASO concurs with this document. LA-UR-11-06159 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

348

DOE F 5634  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 (09/2012) Replaces DOE F470.8 (05-05) All Other Editions are Obsolete U.S. Department of Energy SURVEY/INSPECTION REPORT FORM 1. Type: Survey: Initial Periodic Special Termination OA Reviews: NPR EPR Self-Assessment 2. Report #: 3. Facility Name: 4. a. Facility Code: b. RIS Code: 5. Survey Date(s): 6. a. Findings: Yes No b. Findings Against Other Facilities:

349

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FY 2008 DOE Vehicle FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on AddThis.com... Publications

350

Drell-Yan Cross Sections: Data from DOE laboratory experiments as compiled in data reviews by the Durham High Energy Physics Database Group  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

A compilation of data on Drell-Yan cross sections above a lepton-pair mass of 4 GeV/c2 is presented. The relevant experiments at Fermilab and CERN are included dating from approximately 1977 to the present day, covering p, p and pi +or- beams on a variety of nuclear and hydrogen targets, with centre-of-mass energies from 8.6 GeV to 630 GeV. The type of data presented include d sigma /dm, d2 sigma /dm dx and d2 sigma /dm dy distributions as well as other variations of these, and also transverse momentum distributions. The data are compared with a standard theoretical model, and a phenomenological 'K-factor' for each set is calculated. (Taken from the abstract of A Compilation of Drell-Yan Cross sections, W.J. Stirling and M.R. Whalley, Journal of Physics G (Nuclear and Particle Physics), Volume 19, Data Review, 1993.) The Durham High Energy Physics (HEP) Database Group makes these data, extracted from papers and data reviews, available in one place in an easy-to-access format. These data are also included in the Durham HEP Reaction Data Database which can be searched at http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/spires/hepdata/reac.html.

Stirling, W. J.; Whalley, M. R.

351

Technical Standards, DOE-STD-1082-94 - November 29, 1995 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

plans for DOE nuclear safety requirements. DOE requirements are identified in DOE Rules, Orders, Notices, Immediate Action Directives, and Manuals (hereinafter referred...

352

Geothermal Technologies Program: Direct Use  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This general publication describes geothermal direct use systems, and how they have been effectively used throughout the country. It also describes the DOE program R&D efforts in this area, and summarizes several projects using direct use technology.

Not Available

2004-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

353

DOE Seeks Public Views On How Best To Streamline Existing Regulations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Seeks Public Views On How Best To Streamline Existing DOE Seeks Public Views On How Best To Streamline Existing Regulations DOE Seeks Public Views On How Best To Streamline Existing Regulations January 31, 2011 - 5:53pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announced two immediate steps to implement the Obama Administration's Executive Order on Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, which directs federal agencies to review existing regulations and determine whether they are still necessary and crafted effectively to solve current problems. First, to engage the public in a transparent review process, the Department is issuing a Request for Information asking the public how best to streamline existing regulations and to identify rules that are obsolete, unnecessary, unjustified, or simply no longer make sense. All comments and reply

354

DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory Committee - January 2009 DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory Committee - January 2009 The Department of Energy's (DOE) Electricity Advisory Committee (EAC) released three reports prepared for the Secretary of Energy's consideration. These reports review challenges facing DOE and the Nation in many important electricity areas, and include recommendations for policy and program initiatives. They address issues surrounding generation and transmission adequacy, energy efficiency and demand response, deployment of energy storage technologies, and deployment of smart grid technologies. DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory Committee

355

DOE F 5631.25  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 (07/2012) All Other Editions Are Obsolete U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FILE TRANSFER RECORD THE FOLLOWING PERSONNEL SECURITY FILE(S) IS/ARE TRANSMITTED AS INDICATED: NAME (LAST, FIRST, MIDDLE) DOE NUMBER RECEIVING OFFICE SYMBOL REVIEW AND RETURN RETAIN PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT - Collection of the information requested is authorized by Department of Energy (DOE) Order 472.2, "Personnel Security." The information placed on this form is used to officially transmit DOE Personnel Security Files (PSFs) among DOE Cognizant Personnel Security Offices and authorized officials. Copies of this document may be maintained in PSFs and personnel security administrative files as necessary. Access to DOE PSFs is permitted as stipulated in DOE O

356

DOE O 483.1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 01-12-01 Sunset Review: 01-12-03 Expiration: 01-12-05 SUBJECT: DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS 1. OBJECTIVES. a. To establish Department of Energy (DOE) policy, requirements, and responsibilities for the oversight, management, and administration of Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) activities at DOE facilities. b. Through the use of CRADAs, consistent with the terms of the facility contract or delegation of authority, DOE and its facilities will- (1) facilitate the efficient and expeditious development, transfer, and exploitation of Federally owned or originated technology to non-DOE entities for the public benefit and to enhance the accomplishment of DOE missions;

357

DOE Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

358

DOE Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

772 772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

359

Inclusive Particle Production Data in E+E- Interactions: Data from DOE laboratory experiments as compiled in data reviews by the Durham High Energy Physics Database Group  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

A comprehensive compilation of experimental data on inclusive particle production in e+e- interactions is presented. Data are given in both tabular and graphical form for multiplicities and inclusive differential cross sections from experiments at all of the world`s high energy e+e- colliders. To facilitate comparison between the data sets, curves are also shown from the JETSET 7.4 Monte Carlo program. (Taken from the abstract of A Compilation of Inclusive Particle Production Data in E+E- Annihilation, G.D. Lafferty, P.I. Reeves, and M.R. Whalley, Journal of Physics G (Nuclear and Particle Physics), Volume 21, Number 12A, 1995.) The Durham High Energy Physics (HEP) Database Group makes these data, extracted from papers and data reviews, available in one place in an easy-to-access format. These data are also included in the Durham HEP Reaction Data Database which can be searched at http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/spires/hepdata/reac.html.

Lafferty, G. D.; Reeves, P. I.; Whalley, M. R.

360

Single Photon Production in Hadronic Interactions: Data from DOE laboratory experiments as compiled in data reviews by the Durham High Energy Physics Database Group  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

Vogelsang and Whalley in their 1997 paper, A Compilation of Data on Single and Double Prompt Photon Production in Hadron-Hadron Interactions published in volume 23 of Journal of Physics G (Nuclear and Particle Physics) present the compilation as well as an interpretation of these data in terms of the state-of-the-art NLO theory with specific emphasis on the uncertainties involved. They also say, Comparisons of this theory with the individual data sets are made in order to indicate to the reader the scope and general status of the available data. For completeness, data on two-prompt-photon production are also included in a separate small section. The data gathered from the relevant collaborations at DOEs Fermilab are available, and so are data from related collaborations based at CERN. The Durham High Energy Physics (HEP) Database Group makes these data, extracted from papers and data reviews, available in one place in an easy-to-access format. These data are also included in the Durham HEP Reaction Data Database which can be searched at http://durpdg.dur.ac.uk/spires/hepdata/reac.html.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

4th Annual DOE-ERSP PI Meeting: Abstracts  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Focus Areas PresentationsDOE National Laboratories 1:30of the liquid-solid interface does not alter the segregationof contaminants at DOE field sites. Hy- potheses directed

Hazen, Terry C.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 2 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems...

363

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of...

364

Review of SAR for Packaging Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Packaging Review Guide (PRG) provides guidance for Department of Energy (DOE) review and approval of packagings to transport fissile and Type B quantities of radioactive material.

365

DOE-HDBK-3012-96  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Guide to Good Practices For Operational Readiness Reviews Replaced by DOE-STD-3006-2000 | SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-94 (September 1994) This guidance section provides instructions, explanations and examples for the performance of all phases of an Operational Readiness Review (ORR). Details pertinent to the Team Leader (TL), Team Members (TM) and Review Coordinator (RC) are outlined. An appendix contains sample forms and correspondence which are typically used to initiate and perform the ORR.

366

DOE`s Advanced Turbine Systems Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper discusses the Advanced Turbine Systems (ATS) Program, which is necessary to achieve METC`s vision for future IGCC systems. This major new program is a cooperative effort in which DOE`s Office of Fossil Energy (FE) and Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy (CE) are joining forces with the private sector to develop ultra-high efficiency gas turbine systems. A goal of this Program is to have a utility-size gas turbine with a 60 percent efficiency (lower heating value basis (LHV)) ready for commercialization by the year 2002. (While this paper focuses on utility-size turbines which are the primary interest of this audience, an ultra-high efficiency, industrial-size gas turbine will also be developed in the ATS Program with a comparable improvement in efficiency.) Natural gas is the target fuel of the Program, a recognition by DOE that natural gas will play a significant role in supplying future power generation needs in the US. However, to insure that the US has fuel supply options, ATS designs will be adaptable to coal and biomass fuels. Therefore, the ATS Program will directly benefit IGCC and other advanced coal based power generation systems. Cost and efficiency improvements in the turbine system as well as in the gasification and gas stream cleanup plant sections will enable IGCC to reach a cost target of $1,000--$1,280/kW and an efficiency goal of 52 percent (higher heating value basis (HHV)) in the post-2000 market.

Bechtel, T.F.; Bajura, R.A.; Salvador, L.A.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

DOE-SPEC-3019-96; Valve-Regulated Type Lead-Acid Storage Batteries  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9-96 9-96 August 1996 DOE SPECIFICATION VALVE-REGULATED TYPE LEAD-ACID STORAGE BATTERIES U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6140 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009470 DOE-SPEC-3019-96 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DOE-SPEC-3019-96 iii FOREWORD 1. Use of this purchase specification is not mandatory. User should review the document and

368

Order Module--DOE O 451.1B, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT COMPLIANCE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

51.1B, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT 51.1B, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM Order Module--DOE O 451.1B, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM DOE O 451.1B, National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program, replaces DOE O 451.1A of the same name. DOE O 451.1B is ten pages long. Due to the concise nature of this Order, this module will be limited to one level. To complete this module and satisfy the requirements for qualification 1. Obtain a copy of DOEO 451.1B. A copy of this document is available on the Office of Management and Administration's Web site at http://www.directives.doe.gov or through the course manager. 2. Review the objectives, requirements, and responsibilities sections of the Order. 3. When you are ready, ask the course manager for the criterion test.

369

Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form This guidance package is meant to be a companion piece for the self-directed RBSM Interview Form and describes the basic mechanics of the RBSM process. Examples are provided to clarify the review process and provide the reviewer with some of the rationale behind the questions that are asked. This companion piece does not emulate the exact order of the review process interview form but rather, attempts to address the major pathways that may be followed along the way to selecting a given disposition category. Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form More Documents & Publications Surveillance & Maintenance: The Requirements Based Surveillance and

370

Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form This guidance package is meant to be a companion piece for the self-directed RBSM Interview Form and describes the basic mechanics of the RBSM process. Examples are provided to clarify the review process and provide the reviewer with some of the rationale behind the questions that are asked. This companion piece does not emulate the exact order of the review process interview form but rather, attempts to address the major pathways that may be followed along the way to selecting a given disposition category. Guidance to Completing the Self-Directed RBSM Interview Form More Documents & Publications Surveillance & Maintenance: The Requirements Based Surveillance and

371

EMSL Outlook Review 2005  

SciTech Connect

The William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) is a national user facility that contains state-of-the-art instrumentation and expert resources available for use by researchers from academia, industry, and the national laboratory system. The facility is supported by the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Biological and Environmental Research Program, but the research conducted within the facility benefits many funding agencies, including other branches of DOE, the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Defense. EMSL requires the continued funding and support of its stakeholders and clients to continue to grow its mission, build its reputation as a sought-after national user facility with cutting-edge capabilities, and attract high-profile users who will work to solve the most critical scientific challenges that affect DOE and the nation. In this vein, this document has been compiled to provide these stakeholders and clients with a review document that provides an abundance of information on EMSLs history, current research activities, and proposed future direction.

Campbell, Allison A.

2005-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

EMSL 2008 Operational Review  

SciTech Connect

The William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) is a national user facility that contains state-of-the-art instrumentation and expert resources available for use by researchers from academia, industry, and the national laboratory system. The facility is supported by the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Biological and Environmental Research Program, but the research conducted within the facility benefits many funding agencies, including other branches of DOE, the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Defense. EMSL requires the continued funding and support of its stakeholders and clients to continue to grow its mission, build its reputation as a sought-after national user facility with cutting-edge capabilities, and attract high-profile users who will work to solve the most critical scientific challenges that affect DOE and the nation. In this vein, this document has been compiled to provide these stakeholders and clients with a review document that provides an abundance of information on EMSLs history, current research activities, and proposed future direction.

Campbell, Allison A.

2008-08-12T23:59:59.000Z

373

Rediness Review Team Leader Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LEADER LEADER TRAINING Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Michael Hillman DOE-HSS HQ Dan M. Stover, PE Technical And Professional Services, Inc. November 10 2010 Official DOE Team Leader Readiness Review Training November 10, 2010 READINESS REVIEW TEAM LEADER TRAINING Introduction & Course Conduct Readiness Review Official DOE Team Leader Readiness Review Training TRAINING READINESS REVIEW TEAM LEADER TRAINING Purpose of this Course Provide prospective Readiness Review Team Leaders with: -An understanding of the Team Leader Roles and Responsibilities -Methods to control team dynamics -Methods to manage interaction with the assessed organization Methods to manage interaction with the assessed organization

374

DOE Reg. Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 21, 2011 March 21, 2011 Page 1 March 21, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011 requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI is the trade association representing manufacturers of heating, cooling, water heating, and commercial refrigeration equipment. More than 300 members strong, AHRI is an internationally recognized advocate for the industry, and develops standards for and certifies the performance of

375

DOE Standards Actions, November 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Projects Canceled DOE Projects Canceled The following DOE Technical Standards project was recently can- celed. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the person listed below. • Worker Protection for Uranium Facilities, Project Number SAFT-0058; Peter O’Connell, EH-52; 301-903-5641, Peter .O’Connell@eh.doe.gov. This project was superceded by Guide of Good Practices for Oc- cupational Radiological Protec- tion in Uranium Facilities, Project Number SAFT-0072. DOE Technical Stan- dards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with copies for comment. The full text of these documents are available on the Technical Standards Pro- gram (TSP) Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page.

376

DOE O 482.1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy ORDER Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 01-12-01 Sunset Review: 01-12-03 Expires: 01-12-05 SUBJECT: DOE FACILITIES TECHNOLOGY PARTNERING PROGRAMS 1. OBJECTIVES. a. To establish Department of Energy (DOE) policy, consistent with the terms of the facility contract or delegation of authority, to- (1) facilitate the efficient and expeditious development, transfer, and exploitation of Federally owned or originated technology to non-DOE entities for the public benefit and to enhance the accomplishment of DOE missions; (2) leverage DOE resources, through its programs and facilities, through partnering; and (3) ensure fairness of opportunity, protect the national security, promote the economic interests of the United States, prevent inappropriate competition with

377

DOE F  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1325.8. (8-89) EFO IO?-90) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum _._ ._, \\--C' - ,, 0, DATE: AUG 3, 9 !gg4 \c. -7 REPLY TO AlTN OF: Eli-421 (U. A. Williillas, 427-1719) SUBJECT: Elimination of the Sites from the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Actieu Program To' The File In 1990, with the assistance of Mr. Doug Tonkay and Ms. Michelle Landis, I reviewed a number of sites that had formerly provided goods and/or services to the Fernald facility as subcontractors. For 24 of .these sites, recomaendations were made to eliminate them from further consideration under Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Progrm (FUSRAP). In each case, I made or reviewed the evaluation, and, in each case, a handwritten evaluation was prepared. This is to provide a more

378

DOE-STD-1160-2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Occupational Safety Functional Area Qualification Standard The Occupational Safety technical functional area qualification standard (FAQS) establishes common functional area competency requirements for all DOE occupational safety personnel who provide assistance, or direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOEs defense nuclear facilities.

379

An assessment of the DOE Active Solar Planning Process: Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report is a review of the planning process used by the Active Solar Heating and Cooling Program, Office of Solar Heat Technologies, US Department of Energy as it pertains to a project title, ''An Industry Assessment of Solar Building R and D Needs.'' This report will restrict its discussion to the active solar planning aspects of this particular project, and will not address Congressional plans for funding the DOE solar programs, DOE national laboratory planning procedures, internal DOE programmatic directives and procedures, or planning activities provided by DOE support services contractors. The purpose of the DOE planning process is to establish a systemmatic procedure for developing a future program of activities. The DOE procedure is designed to include an assessment of current goals and objectives, review direction of the overall program, and appraise present program activities to assure they are in tune with the public interest and private sector needs. This project was designed to provide broad private sector input to the process.

Not Available

1985-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

DOE - Office of Legacy Management  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Weldon Spring Site Five-Year Review Survey Weldon Spring Site Five-Year Review Survey Community involvement is considered an integral part of the Weldon Spring Site and the five-year review process. Section 121 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), requires that remedial actions which result in any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site be subject to a five-year review. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently conducting the fourth five-year review at the Weldon Spring Site. The purpose of a five-year review is to ensure that the remedy that was implemented to clean up the site continues to protect human health and the environment.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Directed Nano-Scale and Macro-Scale Architectures for Semiconductor Absorbers and Transparent Conducting Substrates for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Thomas F. Jaramillo (Primary Contact), Arnold J. Forman, Zhebo Chen Dept. of Chemical Engineering, 381 N-S Axis Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 Phone: (650) 498-6879 Email: jaramillo@stanford.edu DOE Manager HQ: Eric Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@hq.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-AC36-08GO28308 Subcontract Number: NFT-9-88567-01 Subcontractor: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Stanford, CA Project Start Date: December 18, 2008 Projected End Date: September 30, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives The main objective of this project is to develop third- generation materials and structures with new properties that can potentially meet DOE targets (2013 and 2018) for

382

DOE/FE-0564  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Prepared by: U.S. Department of Energy Natural Gas Imports and Exports First Quarter Report 2013 LNG Trinidad and Tobago Canada Mexico Qatar Yemen NATURAL GAS IMPORTS AND EXPORTS FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2013 Office of Natural Gas Regulatory Activities Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy 202-586-9478 ngreports@hq.doe.gov Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................... 1 1 Quarterly Summary ...................................................... 3 Maps of Imports & Exports by Point of Entry/Exit ................................... 5 Tabular Summaries & Comparisons .................................................................. 11 1a Quarter in Review ...................................................................................................13

383

DOE-HDBK-1092-98; DOE Handbook Electrical Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

092-98 092-98 January 1998 DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE98001290 DOE-HDBK-1092-98 DOE-HDBK-1092-98 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 3.0 ELECTRICAL PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 4.0 GROUNDING 5.0 SPECIAL OCCUPANCIES 6.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT

384

DOE Code:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

we1rbox installatiOn we1rbox installatiOn ____:....;...=.~;;....:..;=-+- DOE Code: - - !- Project Lead: Wes R1esland NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY J 3-24-10 1 Date: Project Information 1. Project Overview What are tne enwonmental mpacts? Contractor~~ _ _ _ _ ] 11 The purpose of this project is to prepare a pad for a 90 ton crane to get 1nto positiOn and ng up so we can 1 set our new weir box into position We will widen the existing road around 20 feet at the north end and taper our fill to about5 feet at the south end for a total of about 200 feeL and budd a near level pad for them tong up the crane on We will use the d1rt from the hill irnrnedJateiy north of the work to oe done 2. 3 4 What*s the legal location? What IS the durabon of the prOJed?

385

DOE Onboarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One-Year Passport to Success One-Year Passport to Success What is On-boarding? Orientation On-boarding  Transactional focus and goals  Less than one week  Executed by HR Office  Address new employee needs  Completed paperwork  Strategic focus and goals  Starts before first day through first year  Supervisor & Senior Leadership involvement  Integrate multiple offices, functions and individuals  Address employee needs  Maximizes employee engagement and retention 2 On-boarding Program Goals 3  Build and sustain high-performance culture by accelerating time for new employee to become productive  Create learning opportunities that allow new employees to successfully integrate into their new DOE organization  Provide employees with the tools and resources to

386

DOE 11  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE A ward N o.: D E--NT0005665 Final T echnical R eport (October 2 008 - S eptember 2 012) Source c haracterization a nd t emporal variation o f m ethane s eepage f rom thermokarst l akes o n t he A laska N orth S lope in r esponse t o A rctic c limate c hange Submitted b y: University o f A laska Fairbanks, A K 9 9775 Prepared for: United S tates D epartment o f E nergy National E nergy T echnology L aboratory May 29 th 2013 Office of Fossil Energy 2 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any

387

DOE Pulse  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

go! go! home about archives subscribe Profile Dr. Isaac Gamwo (left) works with Dr. Ward Burgess (right) at the National Energy Technology Laboratory. Photo Credit: NETL. The practical application of an elite researcher's life: Isaac K. Gamwo For a man whose expertise includes reactive multiphase fluid dynamics, complex fluid properties, and chemical looping combustion processes, Dr. Isaac Gamwo is surprisingly easy to comprehend. "The research we do in this lab is not confined to the world of academia," he notes, "it has tangible impacts on the way we produce energy." As senior research chemical engineer at DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Dr. Gamwo is currently focused on complex fluid properties at high temperatures and pressures. His recent work includes

388

DOE-1 BDL SUMMARY. DOE-1 GROUP.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

may be this command. DOE~! Reference Manual. placed in BDL-3W-7405-EN ons c BDl, SUMMARY DOE~ I l.awrence , Californiaused in conjunction with other DOE~l documentation. Table of

Authors, Various

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework for Directives  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

Explains the new ERM framework for developing, revising, and reviewing directives. This memo directs the Office of Management to institutionalize ERM into the ...

2012-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

390

Literature review of market studies of thermal energy storage  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report presents the results of a review of market studies of thermal energy storage (TES). This project was conducted by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for the US Department of Energy (DOE). PNL staff reviewed and consolidated the findings of existing TES market studies conducted in the industrial, commercial, and residential sectors. The purpose of this project was to review and assess previous work and to use the information obtained to help provide direction for future technology transfer planning activities and to identify additional economic research needed within those three sectors. 37 refs.

Hattrup, M.P.

1988-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

Active DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Active DOE Technical Standards Active DOE Technical Standards Document Number Document Title Responsible SLM DOE-HDBK-1001-96 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 DOE-HDBK-1010-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/4-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93

392

DOE-STD-1090-2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 DOE-STD-1090-2007 August 29, 2007 Hoisting and Rigging Standard Replaced by DOE-STD-1090-2011 The reissued June 1995 edition marked a change in classification. The DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) reclassified the manual as a handbook and it was issued as DOE Hoisting and Rigging Handbook (DOE-HDBK-1090-95). After further review, OSTI has reclassified the handbook as a DOE Technical Standard and the September 1996 edition was issued as DOE STANDARD HOISTING AND RIGGING (Formerly Hoisting and Rigging Manual) DOE-STD-1090-96 (Rev-1). Additional revisions issued are DOE-STD-1090-99, DOE-STD-1090-2001, DOE-STD-1090- 2004, and DOE-STD-1090-2007. DOE-STD-1090-2007, Hoisting and Rigging Standard; Cover DOE-STD-1090-2007, Hoisting and Rigging Standard; CN Table

393

Technical Standards, DOE-STD-3006-2000- July 14, 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE-STD-3006-2000: Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews; Replaced by DOE-STD-3006-2010

394

Microsoft Word - 01-15-09 DOE Press Release EAC Reports - FINAL...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(DOE) Electricity Advisory Committee (EAC) released three reports prepared for the Secretary of Energy's consideration. These reports review challenges facing DOE and the Nation...

395

Microsoft Word - DOE_PPPL_M119_Appendix A.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

areas important to DOE and aligns with critical contract vision components. The HR Strategic Plan, which is subordinate to the PPPL Strategic Plan, will be reviewed with DOE...

396

DOE Information Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Information Center The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Center provides citizens a consolidated facility to obtain information and records related to the DOE's...

397

DOE Mentoring Program Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

our employees have fulfilling and productive careers within the Department. DOE Strategic Plan (May 2011) DOE Mentoring Program Page 2 June 2012 Table of Contents DOE...

398

REVIEW----DOE RESPONSE.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

) ) International Transmission Company ) Docket No. PP-230-4 d/b/a ITCTransmission ) RESPONSE OF PJM INTERCONNECTION, L.L.C. TO ANSWER OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION COMPANY d/b/a ITCTransmission AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE MIDWEST INDEPENDENT TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATOR, INC. On April 14, 2011, International Transmission Company, d/b/a ITCTransmission ("ITC" or "Applicant") filed an answer

399

A Review of DOE/NETLs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

. . , Thomas J. Feeley, III 1. , James Murphy 2. , and Lindsay Green 2. 1. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory 2. Science Applications International Corporation INTRODUCTION The environmental performance of the United States' fleet of coal-fired boilers has steadily improved since passage of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). Missions of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen oxide (NOx), particulate matter (PM) have been significantly reduced. NOx emissions have been reduced by 29%, while coal use has increased almost 30%. However, further restrictions on emissions from power plants have been proposed in response to issues such as mercury, acid rain, ground-level ozone, nitrification of aquatic ecosystems, ambient fine

400

DOE ISM REVIEW TEAM PRE-VISIT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

the landfill. They have long promoted sustainability and encouraged staff members to compost and recycle. Green Team Members 2012 Green Machine Recipients Jules Nemeth & Bill...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

NERSC/DOE HEP Requirements Review Participants  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Accelerator Laboratory CMS Center Director Kenneth Bloom University of Nebraska-Lincoln US CMS Tier-2 program leader Jean Cottam NSF Computational and Data-Enabled...

402

A Review of DOE/NETLs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

mine fill applications could be developed in concert with the Department of Interior's Office of Surface Mining under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA). c...

403

Alfven wave. DOE Critical Review Series  

SciTech Connect

This monograph deals with the properties of Alfven waves and with their application to fusion. The book is divided into 7 chapters dealing with linear properties in homogeneous and inhomogeneous plasmas. Absorption is treated by means of kinetic theory. Instabilities and nonlinear processes are treated in Chapters 1 to 6, and the closing chapter is devoted to theory and experiments in plasma heating by Alfven waves. (MOW)

Hasegawa, A.; Uberoi, C.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Monthly Energy Review - March 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

March 31, 2010 March 31, 2010 DOE/EIA-0035(2010/03) Monthly Energy Review March 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. Contacts The Monthly Energy Review is prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, Integrated Energy Statistics Division, Domestic Energy Statistics Team, under the direction of Barbara T. Fichman,

405

Monthly Energy Review - May 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010 DOE/EIA-0035(2010/06) Monthly Energy Review June 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. Contacts The Monthly Energy Review is prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, Integrated Energy Statistics Division, Domestic Energy Statistics Team, under the direction of Barbara T. Fichman,

406

Monthly Energy Review - February 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

February 26, 2010 February 26, 2010 DOE/EIA-0035(2010/02) Monthly Energy Review February 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. Contacts The Monthly Energy Review is prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, Integrated Energy Statistics Division, Domestic Energy Statistics Team, under the direction of Barbara T. Fichman,

407

Monthly Energy Review - July 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

July 30, 2010 July 30, 2010 DOE/EIA-0035(2010/07) Monthly Energy Review July 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. Contacts The Monthly Energy Review is prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, Integrated Energy Statistics Division, Domestic Energy Statistics Team, under the direction of Barbara T. Fichman,

408

Monthly Energy Review - April 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

April 30, 2010 April 30, 2010 DOE/EIA-0035(2010/04) Monthly Energy Review April 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. Contacts The Monthly Energy Review is prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, Integrated Energy Statistics Division, Domestic Energy Statistics Team, under the direction of Barbara T. Fichman,

409

Monthly Energy Review - May 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

May 27, 2010 May 27, 2010 DOE/EIA-0035(2010/05) Monthly Energy Review May 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. Contacts The Monthly Energy Review is prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Markets and End Use, Integrated Energy Statistics Division, Domestic Energy Statistics Team, under the direction of Barbara T. Fichman,

410

DOE-STD-0100T; DOE Standard Licensed Reactor Nuclear Safety Criteria Applicable to DOE Reactors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

00T 00T November 1993 Superseding DOE/NE-0100T April 1991 DOE STANDARD LICENSED REACTOR NUCLEAR SAFETY CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO DOE REACTORS U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AREA SAFT DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly frorn the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94005221 CONTENTS

411

DOE Order on Quality Assurance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: www.directives.doe.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. Approved: 4-25-2011 SUBJECT: QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. PURPOSE. a. To ensure that Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), products and services meet or exceed customers' requirements and expectations. b. To achieve quality for all work based upon the following principles: (1) All work, as defined in this Order, is conducted through an integrated and effective management system; (2) Management support for planning, organization, resources, direction, and control is essential to quality assurance (QA); (3) Performance and quality improvement require thorough, rigorous

412

External Technical Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document has been developed to guide individuals and teams who will be involved in External Technical Reviews (ETR) of U.S. Department of Energys Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM)...

413

A review of potential turbine technology options for improving the off-design performance of direct coal-fired gas turbines in base load service. Second topical report  

SciTech Connect

The January, 1988 draft topical report, entitled ``An Assessment of Off-Design Particle Control Performance on Direct Coal-Fired Gas Turbine Systems`` [Ref.1.1], identified the need to assess potential trade-offs in turbine aerodynamic and thermodynamic design which may offer improvements in the performance, operational and maintenance characteristics of open-cycle, direct coal-fired, combustion gas turbines. In this second of a series of three topical reports, an assessment of the technical options posed by the above trade-offs is presented. The assessment is based on the current status of gas turbine technology. Several industry and university experts were contacted to contribute to the study. Literature sources and theoretical considerations are used only to provide additional background and insight to the technology involved.

Thomas, R.L.

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

A review of potential turbine technology options for improving the off-design performance of direct coal-fired gas turbines in base load service  

SciTech Connect

The January, 1988 draft topical report, entitled An Assessment of Off-Design Particle Control Performance on Direct Coal-Fired Gas Turbine Systems'' (Ref.1.1), identified the need to assess potential trade-offs in turbine aerodynamic and thermodynamic design which may offer improvements in the performance, operational and maintenance characteristics of open-cycle, direct coal-fired, combustion gas turbines. In this second of a series of three topical reports, an assessment of the technical options posed by the above trade-offs is presented. The assessment is based on the current status of gas turbine technology. Several industry and university experts were contacted to contribute to the study. Literature sources and theoretical considerations are used only to provide additional background and insight to the technology involved.

Thomas, R.L.

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 DOE Hydrogen 1 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and

416

Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Hydrogen DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and

417

Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Hydrogen DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and

418

DOE FUNDAMENTALS HANDBOOK  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Electrical Science Fundamentals Handbook was developed to assist nuclear facility operating contractors provide operators, maintenance personnel, and the technical staff with the necessary fundamentals training to ensure a basic understanding of electrical theory, terminology, and application. The handbook includes information on alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) theory, circuits, motors, and generators; AC power and reactive components; batteries; AC and DC voltage regulators; transformers; and electrical test instruments and measuring devices. This information will provide personnel with a foundation for understanding the basic operation of various types of DOE nuclear facility electrical equipment.

unknown authors

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

419

Facility Representative Program: Program Directives and Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility Representative of the Year Award FR Program Assessment Guide (Appendix B, DOE STD 1063-2011) Program Directives and Guidance FR Program Standard, DOE STD 1063-2011,...

420

DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-92 DOE-HDBK-10142-92 January 23, 1996 DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Mathematics Volume 2 of 2 Reaffirmed 1999 The handbook includes a review of introductory mathematics and the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12-2003 DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 November 26, 2003 Guide To Good Practices For Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR), Team Leader's Guide SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-96 This guidance...

422

DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

42-92 DOE-HDBK-10142-92 January 23, 1996 DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Mathematics Volume 2 of 2 Reaffirmed 1999 The handbook includes a review of introductory mathematics and the...

423

DOE M 483.1-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Approved: 1-12-01 Approved: 1-12-01 Sunset Review: 1-12-03 Expiration: 1-12-05 DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS MANUAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Science and Technology Policy Analysis DISTRIBUTION: INITIATED BY: All Departmental Elements Office of Science and Technology Policy Analysis DOE M 483.1-1 DOE M 483.1-1 i (and ii) 1-12-01 DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS MANUAL 1. PURPOSE. This Manual provides detailed requirements to supplement DOE O 483.1, DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, dated 1- 12-01, which establishes requirements for the performance of technology transfer through the use of Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs). 2. REFERENCE. DOE O 483.1, DOE COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND

424

Memorandum Memorializing Ex Parte Communication, DOE impending  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum Memorializing Ex Parte Communication, DOE impending Memorandum Memorializing Ex Parte Communication, DOE impending determination of coverage for commercial and industrial fans, blowers, and fume hoods. Memorandum Memorializing Ex Parte Communication, DOE impending determination of coverage for commercial and industrial fans, blowers, and fume hoods. The meeting was requested by AMCA International to introduce the association's leadership, standards, and experience in developing fan standards to DOE; to learn more about the DOE process for developing regulations for fan efficiency standards; and to inform DOE on how commercial and industrial fan markets work. AMCA_Ex_Parte.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1168-2013 DOE Meeting Memorandum: Ex Parte Communications Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - August 2011

425

ORISE: Providing Support for DOE Scientific Research  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Decision-Makers The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) serves as the primary coordinator of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science peer reviews....

426

GLAST Reports | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

GLAST Reports GLAST Reports High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) HEPAP Home Meetings Members .pdf file (20KB) Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (44KB) HEP Committees of Visitors HEP Home Charges/Reports GLAST Reports Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Large Area Telescope (LAT) is the principal instrument on the NASA Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST) mission, scheduled for launch in September 2007 DOE/NASA Review of the LAT Project .doc file (49KB) (February 2005) DOE/NASA Review of the LAT Project .doc file (61KB) (October 2004) DOE/NASA Review of the LAT Project .pdf file (36KB) (March 2004) DOE/NASA Review of the LAT Project .pdf file (21KB) (July 2003) DOE/NASA Review of the LAT Project, (May 2003) DOE/NASA Review of the LAT Project, .pdf file (13KB) (January 2003))

427

DOE Standards Actions, February 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Standards Projects Initiated Technical Standards Projects Initiated The following DOE technical standards project was recently initi- ated. If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of this standard, please contact the persons listed below. • Definitions and Acronyms to Good Practices for Maintenance at DOE Nuclear Facilities, Project Number MNTY-0025; Charles B. Ramsey, EH-31; 301-903-5999, Chuck.Ramsey @hq.doe.gov. DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with cop- ies for comment. The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this docu-

428

Review and Workshops, Spallation Neutron Source, SNS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review and Workshops DOE Review May 7 - 9 2002 SNS Diagnostics Review Agenda July 2002 ICFA Advanced Workshop on HALO Dynamics, Diagnostics, Collimation (HALO '03) Top of Page Last...

429

Readiness Review RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Readiness Review Module Readiness Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R Readin Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan ness Rev view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) view e pplicability D-3 EMENT CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-

430

DOE-SPEC-3018-96; Flooded-Type Lead-Acid Storage Batteries  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8-96 8-96 August 1996 DOE SPECIFICATION FLOODED-TYPE LEAD-ACID STORAGE BATTERIES U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6140 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No.DE96009469 DOE-SPEC-3018-96 iii FOREWORD 1. Use of this purchase specification is not mandatory. User should review the document and determine if it meets the user's purpose.

431

DOE Order 344.1A, Parking at the Forrestal Facility  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

344.1A 344.1A Approved: 11-2-01 Admin Chg 1: 11-19-04 This directive was reviewed and certified as current and necessary by Susan J. Grant, Director, Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/Chief Financial Officer, 11-19-04. SUBJECT: PARKING 1. OBJECTIVES. To define policies and procedures governing the assignment, use, and management of parking spaces controlled by the Department of Energy (DOE) in the Forrestal Facility. 2. CANCELLATION. This Order cancels HQ O 344.1, Parking, dated 3-5-97. 3. APPLICABILITY. This Order applies to DOE Federal employees, including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Federal employees, parking at DOE Headquarters in the Forrestal Building. 4. REQUIREMENTS. a. General. It is the policy of DOE that its parking facility be operated in a manner

432

DOE Lessons Learned Documents and Information  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Corporate Operating Experience Review Program Corporate Operating Experience Review Program Home Contact Us Documents & Info DOE LL Database LL Links Special Operations Reports Safety Advisories Safety Alerts Special Reports Safety Bulletins OE Summaries Just-In-Time Reports Defense Nuclear Security Lessons Learned Center (DNS-LLC) HSS Logo Corporate Operating Experience Program DOE Corporate Operating Experience (OE) Program: The Department of Energy's (DOE) corporate OE Program helps to prevent the recurrence of significant adverse events/trends by sharing performance information, lessons learned and good practices across the DOE complex. This program includes: DOE Site Performance Information, ORPS Weekly Summary of Significant Occurrences DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Collection Jump to the Lessons Learned products which make up the major sections of this web page.

433

About DOE Green Energy  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

About DOE Green Energy Search DOE Green Energy to find publicly available bibliographic citations, technical reports and patent information on different types of renewable energy resources and energy conservation, such as solar, wind, bioenergy, hydroelectric and geothermal. For example, R&D on different types of vehicle technology, as well as studies regarding electricity and other power sources, are available. Subject areas include but are not limited to hydrogen, solar energy, tidal and wave power, energy storage, and direct energy conversion. When you search the Green Energy portal, your keyword query will be mapped to scientific concepts. This semantic technique, called "keyword to concept" mapping, is applied to your search behind the scenes and helps hone your search for more efficient knowledge access and discovery. This means that you will receive results that allow you to explore more narrow concepts, related concepts, or even broader concepts. DOE Green Energy affords you the use of the familiar and simple search box - yet still provides the benefits of an advanced search technology to help get at the information you need.

434

DOE Energy Challenge Project  

SciTech Connect

Project Objectives: 1. Promote energy efficiency concepts in undergraduate and graduate education. 2. Stimulate and interest in pulp and paper industrial processes, which promote and encourage activities in the area of manufacturing design efficiency. 3. Attract both industrial and media attention. Background and executive Summary: In 1997, the Institute of Paper Science and Technology in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy developed a university design competition with an orientation to the Forest Products Industry. This university design competition is in direct alignment with DOEs interests in instilling in undergraduate education the concepts of developing energy efficient processes, minimizing waste, and providing environmental benefits and in maintaining and enhancing the economic competitiveness of the U.S. forest products industry in a global environment. The primary focus of the competition is projects, which are aligned with the existing DOE Agenda 2020 program for the industry and the lines of research being established with the colleges comprising the Pulp and Paper Education and Research Alliance (PPERA). The six design competitions were held annually for the period 1999 through 2004.

Frank Murray; Michael Schaepe

2009-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

435

Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial 8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Attached is Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Richard Bonnell of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division at (202) 287-1747 or at richard.bonnell@hq.doe.gov. Flash 2013-38 Revisions to the Merit Review Guide 2013.pdf Merit Review Guide FINAL JULY 2013 ATTACHMENT 1 Sample Merit Rev Panel Appt Letter 1-10.docx ATTACHMENT 2 Sample COI ADDED WB LANGUAGE JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 3 - Sample Evaluation and Selection Plan JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 4 Sample Noncompetitive Review Plan.docx ATTACHMENT 5 Sample Initial Compliance Review 1-16.docx

436

Direct energy conversion systems  

SciTech Connect

The potential importance of direct energy conversion to the long-term development of fusion power is discussed with stress on the possibility of alleviating waste heat problems. This is envisioned to be crucial for any central power station in the 21st century. Two approaches to direct conversion, i.e., direct collection and magnetic expansion, are reviewed. While other techniques may be possible, none have received sufficient study to allow evaluation. It is stressed that, due to the intimate connection between the type of fusion fuel, the confinement scheme, direct conversion, and the coupling technique, all four element must be optimized simultaneously for high overall efficiency.

Miley, G.H.

1978-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

DOE-STD-1091-96; DOE Standard Firearms Safety  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-96 1-96 February 1996 DOE STANDARD FIREARMS SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009493 DOE-STD-1091-96 iii CONTENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

438

Ecological risks of DOE`s programmatic environmental restoration alternatives  

SciTech Connect

This report assesses the ecological risks of the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Environmental Restoration Program. The assessment is programmatic in that it is directed at evaluation of the broad programmatic alternatives outlined in the DOE Implementation Plan. It attempts to (1) characterize the ecological resources present on DOE facilities, (2) describe the occurrence and importance of ecologically significant contamination at major DOE facilities, (3) evaluate the adverse ecological impacts of habitat disturbance caused by remedial activities, and (4) determine whether one or another of the programmatic alternatives is clearly ecologically superior to the others. The assessment focuses on six representative facilities: the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL); the Fernald Environmental Management Project (FEMP); the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), including the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Y-12 plant, and K-25 plant; the Rocky Flats Plant; the Hanford Reservation; and the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant.

Not Available

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

DOE-HDBK-1132-99; DOE Handbook Design Considerations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32-99 32-99 April 1999 DOE HANDBOOK DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS U.S. Department of Energy AREA EDCN Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-HDBK-1132-99 TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE iii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii PART I: DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

440

DOE Science Showcase - Carbon Capture research in DOE Databases...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Sciences Division, DOE Office of Science DOE Key R&D Programs and Initiatives, DOE DOE Fossil Energy Techline, DOE What is carbon sequestration? NETL 2010 Carbon Sequestration...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA In May 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a policy in...

442

DOE F 1350.4 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Program Review Centers Information Sheet More Documents & Publications Customer Services Handbook, 2010, Office of Administration DOE HQ F 1420.7 Guidance for Planning Exercises...

443

DOE Office of Science Computing Facility Operational Assessment...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Assessment (OA) Review of the efficiencies in the steady-state operations of each of the DOE Office of Science High Performance Computing (HPC) Facilities. * OMB requirement for...

444

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record 9013: Energy requirements...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 Peschka, W. (1992). "Liquid Hydrogen." Springer-Verlag, New York. 7 Active Magnetic Regenerative Liquefier, John Barclay, Prometheus Energy DOE Annual Merit Review, May 2009...

445

DOE Hydrogen Analysis Repository: Hydrogen Production from Renewables...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

at the 1998 DOE Hydrogen Program Review. Keywords: Technoeconomic analysis; hydrogen production; costs; hydrogen storage; renewable Purpose To determine technical and economic...

446

Microsoft Word - Q2 2010 DOE Report Aug 26.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

engineering peer review and presented results, under the title of Decision and Risk Analysis, to DOE project partners via teleconference on April 8. All design decisions were...

447

DOE O 542.2A, Unsolicited Proposals  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order sets forth Department of Energy (DOE) requirements and responsibilities for the receipt, processing, and review of unsolicited proposals (USPs). To ...

2002-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

448

JM for Page Change to DOE O 420.1C, Facility Safety  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

DOE-STD-1104 contains the Department's method and criteria for reviewing and approving nuclear facility's documented safety analysis (DSA). This review and ...

2013-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

449

Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During its 1996 winter study JASON reviewed the DOE Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) program. This included the National Ignition Facility (NIF) and proposed studies. The result of the review was to comment on the role of the ICF program in support of the DOE Science Based Stockpile Stewardship program.

Hammer, D.; Dyson, F.; Fortson, N.; Novick, B.; Panofsky, W.; Rosenbluth, M.; Treiman, S.; York, H.

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

DOE Privacy Steering Committee Charter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Privacy Steering Committee Charter Privacy Steering Committee Charter A. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the Department of Energy (DOE) Privacy Steering Committee (EPSC) is to advise the Senior Agency Official for Privacy (SAOP) and the Department's Privacy Program, providing recommendations to improve policies and program initiatives including breach response and notification, Privacy Impact Assessments, and other privacy matters. The EPSC is an essential component of DOE's ongoing efforts to identify processes to eliminate the unnecessary use of SSNs, and to safeguard Personally Identifiable Information (PII) while mitigating risks where the use of SSNs is authorized by a law, regulation or DOE Directive to fulfill a mission of the Department. B. AUTHORITY The EPSC is established at the direction of the Senior Agency Official for Privacy (SAOP).

451

[an error occurred while processing this directive  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

[an error occurred while processing this directive] ... Thus, many systems administrators do not regularly update non ... works well but it does not protect ...

452

[an error occurred while processing this directive  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

[an error occurred while processing this directive] These are ... of commercial products within NIST web pages is for information only; it does not imply ...

453

Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

use use by Members of Congress, Federal and State agencies, energy analysts, and the general public. EIA welcomes suggestions from readers regarding data series in the MER and in other EIA publications. Related Publication: Readers of the MER may also be interested in EIA's Annual Energy Review, where many of the same data series are provided annually beginning with 1949. Contact our National Energy Information Center at 202-586-8800 for more information. Timing of Release: MER data are normally released in the afternoon of the third-from-the-last workday of each month and are usually available electronically late that day. Internet Addresses: E-Mail: infoctr@eia.doe.gov World Wide Web Site: http://www.eia.doe.gov Gopher Site: gopher://gopher.eia.doe.gov FTP Site: ftp://ftp.eia.doe.gov The Monthly Energy Review (ISSN 0095-7356) is published monthly by the Energy Information

454

Laboratory Directed Research and Development 1998 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

The Laboratory's Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program encourages the advancement of science and the development of major new technical capabilities from which future research and development will grow. Through LDRD funding, Pacific Northwest continually replenishes its inventory of ideas that have the potential to address major national needs. The LDRD program has enabled the Laboratory to bring to bear its scientific and technical capabilities on all of DOE's missions, particularly in the arena of environmental problems. Many of the concepts related to environmental cleanup originally developed with LDRD funds are now receiving programmatic support from DOE, LDRD-funded work in atmospheric sciences is now being applied to DOE's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program. We also have used concepts initially explored through LDRD to develop several winning proposals in the Environmental Management Science Program. The success of our LDRD program is founded on good management practices that ensure funding is allocated and projects are conducted in compliance with DOE requirements. We thoroughly evaluate the LDRD proposals based on their scientific and technical merit, as well as their relevance to DOE's programmatic needs. After a proposal is funded, we assess progress annually using external peer reviews. This year, as in years past, the LDRD program has once again proven to be the major enabling vehicle for our staff to formulate new ideas, advance scientific capability, and develop potential applications for DOE's most significant challenges.

Pam Hughes; Sheila Bennett eds.

1999-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

455

Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Petitioner's  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion Department of Energy's response brief in opposition to the State of Washington's petition for review before the D.C. Circuit; Washington asked the Court to review DOE's decision to terminate development of a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, and to issue a preliminary injunction enjoining DOE from taking further action to terminate the program. Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion More Documents & Publications U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review

456

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

457

DOE LLW classification rationale  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report was about the rationale which the US Department of Energy had with low-level radioactive waste (LLW) classification. It is based on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's classification system. DOE site operators met to review the qualifications and characteristics of the classification systems. They evaluated performance objectives, developed waste classification tables, and compiled dose limits on the waste. A goal of the LLW classification system was to allow each disposal site the freedom to develop limits to radionuclide inventories and concentrations according to its own site-specific characteristics. This goal was achieved with the adoption of a performance objectives system based on a performance assessment, with site-specific environmental conditions and engineered disposal systems.

Flores, A.Y.

1991-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

458

DOE LLW classification rationale  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report was about the rationale which the US Department of Energy had with low-level radioactive waste (LLW) classification. It is based on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s classification system. DOE site operators met to review the qualifications and characteristics of the classification systems. They evaluated performance objectives, developed waste classification tables, and compiled dose limits on the waste. A goal of the LLW classification system was to allow each disposal site the freedom to develop limits to radionuclide inventories and concentrations according to its own site-specific characteristics. This goal was achieved with the adoption of a performance objectives system based on a performance assessment, with site-specific environmental conditions and engineered disposal systems.

Flores, A.Y.

1991-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

459

Breakout Session -- TEC Direction  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

III: TEC III: TEC Direction and Priorities Presented to: Transportation External Coordination Working Group Presented by: Alex Thrower Office of Logistics Management February 7, 2008 San Antonio, Texas 2 Topics of Discussion * Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) charter and membership * Topic group functions * Meeting format 3 TEC Charter and Membership * Mission - TEC was formed in 1992 to improve coordination among the Department of Energy (DOE) and external groups interested in the Department's transportation activities The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) co-chairs TEC with DOE's Environmental Management Program Provides an opportunity for broad based input and information exchange from varied organizations - Members meet semi-annually to participate in

460

Supplement to Administrator's Record of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011 (DOE/EIS-0183) (05/31/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SUPPLEMENT TO ADMINISTRATOR'S RECORD OF DECISION ON SUPPLEMENT TO ADMINISTRATOR'S RECORD OF DECISION ON BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION'S SERVICE TO DIRECT SERVICE INDUSTRIAL (DSI) CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2007-2011 ADMINISTRATOR'S RECORD OF DECISION Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Department of Energy May 31, 2006 1 Supplement to Administrator's Record of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011 I. Background On February 4, 2005, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) sent a letter to customers and constituents describing a public process for comments on certain issues related to service by BPA to its remaining direct service industrial (DSI) customers that had not been finally decided in the Policy For Power Supply Role For Fiscal Years 2007-

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

DOE O 412.1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

All Departmental Elements Office of Field Management U.S. Department of Energy ORDER Washington, D.C. SUBJECT: WORK AUTHORIZATION SYSTEM 1. OBJECTIVES. To establish a work authorization and control process for work performed by designated management and operating (M&O), management and integrating (M&I), environmental restoration management contracts (ERMC) and other contracts determined by the Procurement Executive (hereafter referred to as M&O contractors). 2. CANCELLATION. DOE 5700.7C, WORK AUTHORIZATION SYSTEM, dated 5-18- 92. Cancellation of a directive does not, by itself, modify or otherwise affect any contractual obligation to comply with such a directive. Canceled directives that are incorporated by reference in a contract remain in effect until the contract is modified to

462

Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY2004  

SciTech Connect

The Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab or LBNL) is a multi-program national research facility operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE). As an integral element of DOE's National Laboratory System, Berkeley Lab supports DOE's missions in fundamental science, energy resources, and environmental quality. Berkeley Lab programs advance four distinct goals for DOE and the nation: (1) To perform leading multidisciplinary research in the computing sciences, physical sciences, energy sciences, biosciences, and general sciences in a manner that ensures employee and public safety and protection of the environment. (2) To develop and operate unique national experimental facilities for qualified investigators. (3) To educate and train future generations of scientists and engineers to promote national science and education goals. (4) To transfer knowledge and technological innovations and to foster productive relationships among Berkeley Lab's research programs, universities, and industry in order to promote national economic competitiveness. Berkeley Lab's research and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program support DOE's Strategic Goals that are codified in DOE's September 2003 Strategic Plan, with a primary focus on Advancing Scientific Understanding. For that goal, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 LDRD projects support every one of the eight strategies described in the plan. In addition, LDRD efforts support the goals of Investing in America's Energy Future (six of the fourteen strategies), Resolving the Environmental Legacy (four of the eight strategies), and Meeting National Security Challenges (unclassified fundamental research that supports stockpile safety and nonproliferation programs). The LDRD supports Office of Science strategic plans, including the 20 year Scientific Facilities Plan and the draft Office of Science Strategic Plan. The research also supports the strategic directions periodically under review by the Office of Science Program Offices, such as strategic LDRD projects germane to new research facility concepts and new fundamental science directions.

Hansen, Todd C.

2005-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

463

Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY2004  

SciTech Connect

The Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab or LBNL) is a multi-program national research facility operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE). As an integral element of DOE's National Laboratory System, Berkeley Lab supports DOE's missions in fundamental science, energy resources, and environmental quality. Berkeley Lab programs advance four distinct goals for DOE and the nation: (1) To perform leading multidisciplinary research in the computing sciences, physical sciences, energy sciences, biosciences, and general sciences in a manner that ensures employee and public safety and protection of the environment. (2) To develop and operate unique national experimental facilities for qualified investigators. (3) To educate and train future generations of scientists and engineers to promote national science and education goals. (4) To transfer knowledge and technological innovations and to foster productive relationships among Berkeley Lab's research programs, universities, and industry in order to promote national economic competitiveness. Berkeley Lab's research and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program support DOE's Strategic Goals that are codified in DOE's September 2003 Strategic Plan, with a primary focus on Advancing Scientific Understanding. For that goal, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 LDRD projects support every one of the eight strategies described in the plan. In addition, LDRD efforts support the goals of Investing in America's Energy Future (six of the fourteen strategies), Resolving the Environmental Legacy (four of the eight strategies), and Meeting National Security Challenges (unclassified fundamental research that supports stockpile safety and nonproliferation programs). The LDRD supports Office of Science strategic plans, including the 20 year Scientific Facilities Plan and the draft Office of Science Strategic Plan. The research also supports the strategic directions periodically under review by the Office of Science Program Offices, such as strategic LDRD projects germane to new research facility concepts and new fundamental science directions.

Hansen, Todd C.

2005-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

464

Annual Energy Review 2000  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Review Review 2000 www.eia.doe.gov On the Web at: www.eia.doe.gov/aer Energy Information Administration DOE/EIA-0384(2000) August 2001 Annual Energy Review 2000 The Annual Energy Review (AER) presents the Energy Information Admin- istration's historical energy statistics. For many series, statistics are given for every year from 1949 through 2000. The statistics, expressed in either physical units or British thermal units, cover all major energy activities, in- cluding consumption, production, trade, stocks, and prices, for all major energy commodities, including fossil fuels, electricity, and renewable en- ergy sources. Publication of this report is required under Public Law 95-91 (Department of Energy Organization Act), Section 205(c), and is in keeping with re- sponsibilities given to the Energy Information Administration under Sec- tion 205(a)(2), which

466

DOE Recovery Act Awardees | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Recovery Act Awardees Recovery Act Awardees Dataset Summary Description The data contained within the .xls is the latest list of DOE recovery act awardees. The list is to be updated weekly by the DOE. Source DOE Date Released December 10th, 2010 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords Awardees DOE Recovery Act Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon DOE Recovery Act Awardees - Dec 10 2010 (xls, 949.2 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Weekly Time Period License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) Comment http://www.energy.gov/webpolicies.htm Rate this dataset Usefulness of the metadata Average vote Your vote Usefulness of the dataset Average vote Your vote Ease of access Average vote Your vote

467

Living Direct: Order (2011-CE-1904)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE ordered Living Direct, Inc. to pay a $6,000 civil penalty after finding Living Direct had failed to certify that certain models of dishwashers, refrigerator-freezers and freezers comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.

468

DOE-STD-1063-97; DOE Standard Establishing and Maintaining a Facility Representative Program at DOE Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-97 3-97 October 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1063-93 DOE STANDARD ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE PROGRAM AT DOE FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA FACR Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE98001286 DOE-STD-1063-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy standard is approved for use by all DOE Components.

469

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

18, 2013 18, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period September 30, 2013 through October 31, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) October 15, 2013: A manager at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) determined that the AMWTP Safety Analysis process required review due to an operational trend of fire/combustion events in the Treatment Facility (TF) box lines. Safety analysis for the TF is

470

DOE-1 USERS GUIDE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

systems, etc. b. c. Run DOE-Ion each building design.ECONOMICS (It is assumed that DOE-l has already been run onthe baseline costs). vi. Run DOE-l vii. ECONOMICS report E03

Authors, Various

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

EIS-0450: DOE Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0450: DOE Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement TransWest Express 600 kV Direct...

472

Microsoft Word - DOE-ID-INL-12-015.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

direction of Waste Generator Services (WGS). DOE-ID NEPA CX DETERMINATION IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY Page 2 of 2 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-12-015 Releasing Contaminants - The...

473

DOE Research and Development Accomplishments QR Code  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

including URLs that can direct users to websites. The QR code for access to DOE R&D Accomplishments is available on this web page. Top Some links on this page may take...

474

Agenda for 2013 DOE Earth Week Celebrations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

regarding any of these events may be directed to Beverly Whitehead, Office of Sustainability Support, at (202) 586-6073 or Beverly.Whitehead@hq.doe.gov; or Kristina Wheeler,...

475

Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Economics Presentations Energy Storage Systems 2007 Peer Review - Economics Presentations The U.S. DOE Energy Storage Systems Program (ESS) held an annual peer review on September...

476

Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - Agenda...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AgendaPresentation List Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review - AgendaPresentation List The 2008 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage and Power...

477

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

These reports summarize the comments of expert peer reviewers at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, where each year projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells...

478

Home: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites

content. | Skip to navigation content. | Skip to navigation Site Map Contact Us Current Documents Archived Documents Entire Site only in current section Advanced Search... U.S. Department of Energy Office of Management Directives, Delegations, and Requirements Sections Home Directives Current Directives Draft Directives Archives Delegations Current Delegations Current Designations Rescinded Organizations' Assignment of Responsibility Development & Review RevCom Writers' Tools DPC Corner References News and Updates Help Personal tools You are here: Office of Management » Directives, Delegations, and Requirements Info Home Directives are the Department of Energy's primary means of establishing policies, requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. Directive

479

DOE-HDBK-1114-98  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE-HDBK-1114-98: Guide to Good Practices for Line and Training Manager Activities Superseding DOE-STD-1056-93 (February 1993) The purpose of this guide is to provide direction for line and training managers in carrying out their responsibilities for training and qualifying assigned personnel and to verify that existing training activities are effective.

480

Researching DOE Records  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy (DOE) welcomes researchers interested in documenting the Department's history. Significant portions of DOE's records, including declassified materials on the nuclear...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "reviews doe directives" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE STD 1073-2003, Configuration Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

73-2003 73-2003 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT DOE -STD-1073-2003 Familiar Level August 2011 1 DOE-STD-1073-2003 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of DOE-STD-1073-2003? 2. What are the objectives of configuration management? 3. To what type of DOE facility does DOE-STD-1073-2003 apply? 4. What is the first set of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) that must be included in a configuration management program? 5. What is a work control process? 6. What is the objective of change control? 7. What are three elements that a technical review is designed to verify? 8. What three elements should be included in a design basis review?

482

Supplement to Administrator's Record of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011 (DOE/EIS-0183) (06/19/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

266 Federal Register 266 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices Education, Room 5C141, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202. [FR Doc. 06-5528 Filed 6-16-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-M DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Supplement to Administrator's Record of Decision on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011 AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of final policy. SUMMARY: BPA Administrator Stephen J. Wright signed a supplement to the Administrator's Record of Decision (ROD) on Bonneville Power Administration's Service to Direct Service Industrial (DSI) Customers for Fiscal Years 2007-2011. The original

483

DOE F 1325  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 21, 2010 Report No. OAS-L-10-07 July 21, 2010 Report No. OAS-L-10-07 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A10RL006) SUBJECT: Report on "Integrated Safety Management at the Office of River Protection" TO: Manager, Office of River Protection INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy (Department) regulates and inspects the safety of its own facilities and operations, many of which involve radioactive or hazardous materials. On October 15, 1996, the Department issued DOE Policy 450.4, Safety Management System Policy, which recognizes that Safety Management Systems provide a formal, organized process whereby people can plan, perform, assess, and improve the safe conduct of work. The Safety Management System process is institutionalized through Department directives and is incorporated into contracts to establish Department-wide safety

484

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Chapter 1. Overview of the DOE Project Chapter 1. Overview of the DOE Project Introduction On April 10, 1945, medical staff of the U.S. Manhattan Engineer District in Oak Ridge, TN, injected plutonium into the victim of a car accident. American scientists had only recently begun producing plutonium, and thousands of workers were laboring to produce the quantities required for the first atomic bombs. While aware that plutonium was hazardous, project officials were uncertain how much exposure would cause harm. Desire for information about human metabolism and retention of plutonium led to this first injection in Oak Ridge. Over the next 2 years, 17 other people also received plutonium injections. The Manhattan Project and its postwar successor, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), also carried out human experiments with uranium, polonium, americium, and other radioactive substances. Radiation tests continued after the war; some of these studies took place under AEC supervision and had direct defense-related applications. The agency also sponsored substantial programs in the medical applications of radiation and in basic biomedical research. In addition, independent physicians and researchers at universities and hospitals conducted many postwar human radiation studies to develop the techniques of present-day nuclear medicine.

485