Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

SRREN Comment and Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation Introduction: As part of the Final Government Distribution of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN), the U.S. Government is conducting a review of the Summary for Policymakers for the report. This web site is posted on the internet for the sole purpose of facilitating the U.S. Government review at this time. The U.S. Government provided comments previously as part of the Government and Expert Review hosted on this web site. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research

2

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio...

3

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

4

Standard Review Plan Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Milestones Review & Approval Standard Review Plan (SRP) E n v i r o n m e n t a l M a n a g e m e n t DOE - EM - SRP - 2010 2nd Edition Overview March 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 1 Standard Review Plan Overview Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision Milestones Review and Approval The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission-critical projects/facilities. Coupled with this ongoing mission is the added responsibility for EM to diligently leverage and apply American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds to accelerate the completion of its

5

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

6

Functional Area Qualification Standards - Review Process for...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Interest Legend: Red Technical Standards Program Activities and Responsibilities Blue Directives Program Activities and Responsibilities Review Process for Technical Standards...

7

External Independent Review (EIR) Standard Operating Procedure...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) External Independent Review (EIR) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) EIR SOP.pdf More Documents & Publications ICR-ICE Standard Operating...

8

DOE Review of Regulations- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any...

9

MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energys (DOEs) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that...

10

Solar market studies: review and comment  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes and comments on relevant solar energy market surveys and related studies to provide a basis for determining areas requiring additional research and possible policies and actions to aid in rapid adoption of solar technologies. Thirty-two studies are discussed. The first 19 studies directly assess the market for residential use of solar domestic hot water, space, and pool heating. Studies 20 and 21 inspect energy conservation surveys. Studies 22 and 23 examine the financial incentives and financial institutions in the expanding solar market. Study 24 considers energy and low-income people. Studies 25 and 26 assess market sizes for photovoltaic systems and wind machines. Studies 27 to 30 are not surveys per se, but represent secondary source and modeling efforts to gain understanding of the solar marketplace. Studies 31 and 32 present the Canadian perspective on the market feasibility of solar energy systems. Many of the studies contained flaws of concept and/or method to a degree that would bring into question the credibility of individual findings but, taken as an aggregrate, they provide a useful compendium of opinion about present and potential solar energy users.

Vories, R; Strong, H

1980-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

11

Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is...

12

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Conservation Standards Rulemaking Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report Prepared Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy February 2007 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 6 2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................... 6 3. SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 7

13

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

14

Fourth RFI_Comment on Regulatory Review.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

47328 47328 Vol. 77, No. 153 Wednesday, August 8, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The purpose of DOE's review is to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its

15

EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to request for...

16

Experts to Review Life-Saving Homeland Security Standards  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Experts to Review Life-Saving Homeland Security Standards. For Immediate Release: September 27, 2007. ...

2013-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

17

System specification/system design document comment review: Plutonium Stabilization and Packaging System. Notes of conference  

SciTech Connect

A meeting was held between DOE personnel and the BNFL team to review the proposed resolutions to DOE comments on the initial issue of the system specification and system design document for the Plutonium Stabilization and Packaging System. The objectives of this project are to design, fabricate, install, and start up a glovebox system for the safe repackaging of plutonium oxide and metal, with a requirement of a 50-year storage period. The areas discussed at the meeting were: nitrogen in can; moisture instrumentation; glovebox atmosphere; can marking-bar coding; weld quality; NFPA-101 references; inner can swabbing; ultimate storage environment; throughput; convenience can screw-top design; furnace/trays; authorization basis; compactor safety; schedule for DOE review actions; fire protection; criticality safety; applicable standards; approach to MC and A; homogeneous oxide; resistance welder power; and tray overfill. Revised resolutions were drafted and are presented.

NONE

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing Draft Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement DOE has extended the comment period for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemential EIS through October 10 and announces an additional Public Hearing in Espanola, NM. EIS-0283-S2-CommentExtension-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0312: Notice of Availability of the Bonneville Power Administration Administrator's Record of Decision UDAC Meeting - January 2012 Electricity Advisory Committee Notice of Open Meeting October 2 and 3, 2013: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 176 - September 11, 2013

19

EIS-0350-S1: Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing EIS-0350-S1: Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico DOE/EIS-0350, Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing for the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 76 FR 28222 (May 2011)

20

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011 Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Standard Review Plan (SRP) Modules | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance » Standard Quality Assurance » Standard Review Plan (SRP) Modules Standard Review Plan (SRP) Modules Standard Review Plan - Critical Decision Handbook Overview Project Management Project Execution Plan Review Module (RM) Risk Management RM Integrated Project Team RM Earned Value Management System RM Acquisition Strategy RM Decommissioning Plan RM Site Transition Guidance Engineering and Design Conceptual Design RM Preliminary Design RM Final Design RM Construction Readiness RM Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan RM Readiness Review RM Seismic Design Expectations Report Technology Readiness Assessment Report External Technical Review Report Preparation for Facility Operations RM Safety Safety Design Strategy RM Conceptual Safety Design RM Preliminary Safety Design RM Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM

22

Standard Review Plan - Overview | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review Plan Overview More Documents & Publications Preliminary Safety Design RM Quality Assurance for Critical Decision Reviews RM Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan RM...

23

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rulemaking Rulemaking Peer Review Report - Supporting Documentation Submitted Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy March 2007 Table of Contents PROJECT ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 16 SLIDE PRESENTATIONS ON JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .................................................. 104 PEER REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM.................................................................. 201 PEER REVIEW AGENDA JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .........................................................

24

Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities August 2013 2 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Preparation...

25

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES/OBJECTIVES OF BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? WHY IS BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? Because of the criticality of the work being conducted under its contracts and the increasing pressure being put on its budgets, the Department needs to ensure that work under its contracts: * Is appropriate, appropriately documented and performance-based; * Does not violate restrictions or constraints on the use of Department of Energy (DOE)-controlled facilities; * Complies with appropriate DOE directives; * That voluntary consensus standards are used in preference to Government unique standards; * Is carried out in a manner that protects the workers, public and the environment against hazards; * Is properly authorized; and

26

Comments on the Joint Proposed Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards  

SciTech Connect

I appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the joint rulemaking to establish greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for light-duty vehicles. My comments are directed at the choice of vehicle footprint as the attribute by which to vary fuel economy and greenhouse gas emission standards, in the interest of protecting vehicle occupants from death or serious injury. I have made several of these points before when commenting on previous NHTSA rulemakings regarding CAFE standards and safety. The comments today are mine alone, and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Department of Energy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, or the University of California. My comments can be summarized as follows: (1) My updated analysis of casualty risk finds that, after accounting for drivers and crash location, there is a wide range in casualty risk for vehicles with the same weight or footprint. This suggests that reducing vehicle weight or footprint will not necessarily result in increased fatalities or serious injuries. (2) Indeed, the recent safety record of crossover SUVs indicates that weight reduction in this class of vehicles resulted in a reduction in fatality risks. (3) Computer crash simulations can pinpoint the effect of specific design changes on vehicle safety; these analyses are preferable to regression analyses, which rely on historical vehicle designs, and cannot fully isolate the effect of specific design changes, such as weight reduction, on crash outcomes. (4) There is evidence that automakers planned to build more large light trucks in response to the footprint-based light truck CAFE standards. Such an increase in the number of large light trucks on the road may decrease, rather than increase, overall safety.

Wenzel, Thomas P

2009-10-27T23:59:59.000Z

27

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) provides these comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled Energy Conservation Program: Energy...

28

Peer Review of NRC Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) Models underwent a Peer Review using ASME PRA standard (Addendum C) as endorsed by NRC in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200. The review was performed by a mix of industry probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) experts and NRC PRA experts. Representative SPAR models, one PWR and one BWR, were reviewed against Capability Category I of the ASME PRA standard. Capability Category I was selected as the basis for review due to the specific uses/applications of the SPAR models. The BWR SPAR model was reviewed against 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements; however, based on the Capability Category I level of review and the absence of internal flooding and containment performance (LERF) logic only 216 requirements were determined to be applicable. Based on the review, the BWR SPAR model met 139 of the 216 supporting requirements. The review also generated 200 findings or suggestions. Of these 200 findings and suggestions 142 were findings and 58 were suggestions. The PWR SPAR model was also evaluated against the same 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements. Of these requirements only 215 were deemed appropriate for the review (for the same reason as noted for the BWR). The PWR review determined that 125 of the 215 supporting requirements met Capability Category I or greater. The review identified 101 findings or suggestions (76 findings and 25 suggestions). These findings or suggestions were developed to identify areas where SPAR models could be enhanced. A process to prioritize and incorporate the findings/suggestions supporting requirements into the SPAR models is being developed. The prioritization process focuses on those findings that will enhance the accuracy, completeness and usability of the SPAR models.

Anthony Koonce; James Knudsen; Robert Buell

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

International Review of Framework for Standards & Labeling Setting and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

International Review of Framework for Standards & Labeling Setting and International Review of Framework for Standards & Labeling Setting and Development Title International Review of Framework for Standards & Labeling Setting and Development Publication Type Report Year of Publication 2012 Authors Zhou, Nan, Nina Zheng Khanna, David Fridley, and John Romankiewicz Date Published 09/2012 Publisher Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Keywords appliance, framework, labeling, standards, techno-economics analyses Abstract As appliance energy efficiency standards and labeling (S&L) programs reach a broader geographic and product scope, a series of sophisticated and complex technical and economic analyses have been adopted by different countries in the world to support and enhance these growing S&L programs. The initial supporting techno-economic and impact analyses for S&L development make up a defined framework and process for setting and developing appropriate appliance efficiency standards and labeling programs. This report reviews in-depth the existing framework for standards setting and label development in the well-established programs of the U.S., Australia and the EU to identify and evaluate major trends in how and why key analyses are undertaken and to understand major similarities and differences between each of the frameworks.

30

Review of the IEEE Standard for Computerized Operating Procedure Systems  

SciTech Connect

Increasingly nuclear power plant procedures, such as emergency operating procedures, are being presented in computer form with functionality to support operator use and management of the procedures. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) currently has guidance for the review of computer-based procedures (CBPs); however, there remain CBP functions and human performance issues for which up-to-date guidance is lacking. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) has initiated a standard development effort to address the human factors engineering (HFE) aspects of CBP systems. When completed, it may provide guidance to supplement the NRC staff's review criteria. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the suitability of the IEEE Standard for use in the NRC's HFE safety reviews of CBP systems and to ensure that the guidance meets the NRC's standard for scientific and engineering rigor used in its own guidance development efforts. We established the following criteria with which to evaluate the Standard: (1) it should meet an existing need of NRC reviewers, (2) it should be based in sound HFE principles, (3) it should be thoroughly peer-reviewed, and (4) it should address CBP-related human performance issues identified in the literature. This report describes the methodology we used to evaluate each criterion. Our evaluation concluded that the Standard generally does meet these criteria, however several areas were identified for which additional clarifications are needed. Thus consideration of the Standard's use by the NRC is supported. The standard evaluation methodology developed in this study can be generally applied to the review of other HFE standards being considered for possible use or endorsement by the NRC.

O'Hara, J.; Higgins, J.

2010-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

31

Top-down Beyond the Standard Model Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The recent discovery of the Standard Model boson (SMS) and direct searches place new constraints and a new perspective on New Physics models. I mostly review supersymmetric model building, with special emphasizes on predictions of flavor models on superpartner spectra and inverted hierarchy models, mini-split models, very low-scale supersymmetry breaking predictions and some string theory inspired low-energy spectra.

Dudas, Emilian

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

Top-down Beyond the Standard Model Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The recent discovery of the Standard Model boson (SMS) and direct searches place new constraints and a new perspective on New Physics models. I mostly review supersymmetric model building, with special emphasizes on predictions of flavor models on superpartner spectra and inverted hierarchy models, mini-split models, very low-scale supersymmetry breaking predictions and some string theory inspired low-energy spectra.

Emilian Dudas

2013-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

33

ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARD REVIEW PLAN OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This environmental standard review plan (ESRP) directs the staffs identification and evaluation of impacts to terrestrial ecosystems induced by the operation of heat dissipation systems, especially cooling towers and cooling ponds. The scope of the review directed by this plan will be limited to consideration of the operational aspects of heat dissipation systems in sufficient detail to form a basis for assessing potential operational impacts. Review Interfaces The reviewer for this ESRP should obtain input from or provide input to reviewers for the following ESRPs, as indicated: ` ESRP 2.4.1. Obtain descriptive material on the terrestrial ecology of the site and vicinity to support the analyses made in ESRP 5.3.3.2. ` ESRP 3.4.2. Obtain specific information about the cooling system necessary to assess impacts to the terrestrial environment. ` ESRP 5.3.3.1. Obtain information about heat dissipation to the atmosphere necessary to determine impacts to the terrestrial environment.

unknown authors

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ON JUNE 2003 FOURTH EXTERNAL REVIEW DRAFT CRITERIA DOCUMENT FOR PARTICULATE MATTER  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/OFFICE OF FOSSIL COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/OFFICE OF FOSSIL ENERGY STAFF ON JUNE 2003 FOURTH EXTERNAL REVIEW DRAFT CRITERIA DOCUMENT FOR PARTICULATE MATTER Summary and Conclusions The Fourth External Review Draft Criteria Document for Particulate Matter (henceforth, the CD) is a very comprehensive review of both epidemiological and toxicological research into the health effects of particulate matter (PM) in ambient air. DOE/Office of Fossil Energy offers the following comments on it. OMB's "Principles and Procedures" memorandum to agencies states: "OIRA's [OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs] review also evaluates, on occasion in consultation with the Office of Science and Technology Policy, whether the agency has, in assessing exposure to a risk or an environmental

35

AHAM Comments_DOE Reg Review Sept 2012_FINAL.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 7, 2012 September 7, 2012 By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). AHAM represents manufacturers of major, portable and floor care home appliances, and suppliers to the industry. AHAM's more than 150 members employ tens of thousands of people in the U.S. and produce more than 95% of the household appliances shipped for sale within the

36

Standards Actions, July 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Program Document Status 07-01-2002 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 46 Out for Comment - 14 Published this Month - 2 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 11 Reaffirmation in Progress - 12 Cancellation Pending - 7 Cancellation in Progress - 1 No Current Action - 19 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Published 1 American National Standards Institute 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- July 2002 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated

37

Standards Actions, May 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30-2001 30-2001 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 39 Out for Comment - 19 Published this Month - 0 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 4 Reaffirmation in Progress - 23 Cancellation Pending - 9 Cancellation in Progress - 18 No Current Action - 12 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation 1 Proposed Cancellation of DOE Technical Standards 2 Published DOE Technical Standards 3 American National Standards Institute 3 American National Standards 6 American Society for Testing and Materials 6 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. May 2001 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated

38

Internet requests for comments (RFCs) as scholarly publications  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This note describes the various peer review processes applied to Internet Requests for Comments (RFCs) over a number of years, and suggests that these have been up to normal scholarly standards since at least 1992. The authors believe that these documents ... Keywords: request for comments, rfc

Brian E. Carpenter; Craig Partridge

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Submitting Public Comments The comment period is closed. Milestones and Documents The residential dehumidifiers energy conservation standards rulemaking docket...

40

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Submitting Public Comments The comment period is closed. Milestones and Documents The residential water heaters energy conservation standards rulemaking docket...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Comments of the Integrated Waste Services Association Florida PSC Renewable Portfolio Standard Workshop  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The following comments are submitted by the Integrated Waste Services Association (IWSA). IWSA is the national trade association representing the nations waste-to-energy industry and municipalities. Waste-to-energy facilities produce clean, renewable energy through the combustion of municipal solid waste in specially designed power plants equipped with the most modern pollution control equipment to clean emissions. Trash volume is reduced by 90 % and the remaining residue is safely reused or disposed in landfills. There are 87 waste-to-energy plants operating in 25 states managing about 13 percent of Americas trash, or about 95,000 tons each day. Waste-toenergy generates about 2,700 megawatts of electricity to meet the power needs of nearly 2.3 million homes while serving the trash disposal needs of more than 36 million people. In Florida, 11 WTE plants process over 18,000 tons per day of municipal solid waste, and 514 megawatts of electricity. Waste to Energy benefits in relation to Greenhouse Gases: In response to recent discussions regarding greenhouse gases at the workshop, IWSA would like to point out that a number of studies have shown that waste-to-energy is better than carbon neutral. Use of waste-to-energy avoids emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generation, fugitive methane emissions from decomposing trash in landfills and avoidance of emissions from production of new

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

November 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 10-25-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 23 Out for Comment - 16 Published in September - 0 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6

43

EM Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This memorandum introduces the Second Edition of the Capital and Major Operations Projects Standard Review Plan (SRP).

44

Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening Line Management Oversight and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standard Review Plan Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities August 2013 2 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Preparation for Facility Operations Applicability CD-0 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 Operation Post Operation August 2013 3 Table of Contents Objective ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Requirements .................................................................................................................................. 4 Primary References ......................................................................................................................... 6

45

standards  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... About Circular A-119About Us. Standards. Definition of Standards. Finding Standards. Information on Biometrics Standards.

2012-12-13T23:59:59.000Z

46

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix T (Second Continued Volume): Comments & Responses.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This is Appendix T (second continued volume) giving public comments and responses to the final environmental impact statement for the Columbia River System.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

Critical comments on the US Environmental Protection Agency Standards 40 CFR 191  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper is about the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ``Environmental Standards for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Wastes,`` 40 CFR 191. These standards regulate the disposal of radioactive wastes in geologic repositories. Currently, two repository sites are under investigation: The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site, located near Carlsbad, New Mexico, may become the repository for defense-generated transuranic waste (TRU); and the Yucca Mountain site, located near Las Vegas, Nevada, may become the repository for spent reactor fuel and a small amount of reprocessing waste (hereinafter called high-level radioactive waste or HLW). The paper was written for readers who have an interest in 40 CFR 191 but do not have the time or inclination to ponder the technical details.

Pflum, C.G. [Science Applications International Corp., Las Vegas, NV (United States); Van Konynenburg, R.A. [Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States); Krishna, P. [TRW, Inc., Washington, DC (United States)

1993-01-14T23:59:59.000Z

48

Comments on new technical and economic data available for EPA`s proposed offshore oil and gas discharge guidelines and standards  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this paper is to provide comments on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Notice in the Federal Register entitled, ``Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category, Offshore Subcategory; Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards; New Information and Request or Comments`` (53 FR 41356; October 21, 1988). This Notice announces the availability of new technical, economic and environmental assessment information relating to the development of Best Available Technology economically achievable (BAT and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) regulations under the Clean Water Act governing the discharge of drilling fluids (muds) and drill cuttings from offshore oil and gas facilities. The Notice is part of a rulemaking process which formally began with the initial release of rules in August 1985 and which incorporates numerous comments and additional data received subsequent to the release of the 1985 rules. The comments in this paper will concentrate on the following five issues: Estimated project impacts are misrepresented by assuming weighted-average incremental costs of regulation. Economic impacts are inaccurate, since annual compliance costs will likely affect the number of wells drilled, by the effect of compliance costs on project economics and the reduction in industry cash flows on capital available for drilling. Initial well productivity assumptions for various scenarios do not vary with field size. The assumed lease costs, which are based on historical data, do not accurately reflect the future value of leases. The experimental decline rates assumed for the Pacific are too high.

1989-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

49

Reviewing Consensus HFE Standards for NRC Use: A Case Study using the IEEE Standard for Computerized Operating Procedure Systems  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs) endorsement of consensus standards provides a cost-effective means of enhancing the staffs ability to review state-of-the-art designs. Although the NRC endorsed consensus standards in many technical disciplines, it yet has to do so in human factors engineering (HFE). The purpose of our study was to develop a standardized methodology whereby to evaluate a consensus HFE standard to determine its appropriateness to, and adequacy for using in licensing reviews. The high-level objective of the methodology is to ensure that the guidance meets the NRCs requirements on scientific- and engineering-rigor that they use in developing their own guidance. We propose four criteria for endorsing a consensus standard: (1) It should meet an existing need for NRCs licensing and safety reviews; (2) it should be based on sound HFE principles; (3) it should be thoroughly peer-reviewed; and, (4) it should address human performance issues identified in the literature. Our methodology offers a means to assess these four criteria. We used it to evaluate an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) draft standard on computerized operating procedure systems. We concluded that the IEEE standard generally met the established criteria, although several areas were identified that needed further clarification. Our evaluation methodology particularly was useful for identifying issues to be resolved, and for providing a basis for judging whether the staff should consider endorsing the standard. The methodology also helped recognize criteria in the proposed standard that may benefit from additional scrutiny by the staff. The evaluation methodology developed is applicable generally to reviewing other HFE standards that the NRC is considering for use or endorsement.

OHara, J.M.; Higgins, J.; Xing, J., Fleger S. - NRC

2010-11-07T23:59:59.000Z

50

EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response torequest for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on...

51

A review of building energy standards and implications for Hong Kong  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This paper reviews the development of energy e#ciency programmes and standards for buildings in Hong Kong and other countries, and discusses the implications for the energy-e#ciency standards for commercial buildings in Hong Kong

Joseph Lam; S.C.M. Hui

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

52

Writing a Historical Book Review Writing a historical book review can be different from a standard review, since it must be read and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Writing a Historical Book Review Writing a historical book review can be different from a standard a summary, a historical book review needs to be effective and analytical. The following links will assist you in the writing a book review: Writing an Historical Book Review http

Ellis, Randy

53

Standards Actions, February 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 5 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 6 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 11 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 12 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 01-23-2004 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 36 Out for Comment - 23 Published in January - 3 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 13 Reaffirmation in Progress - 26 Cancellation Pending - 1 Cancellation in Progress - 3 No Current Action - 0 Inside This Visit the Technical Standards Program

54

July 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 06-28-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 21 Out for Comment - 10 Published in June - 2 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-6 Revision in Progress-3

55

Comments on the Joint Proposed Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on occupant safety than fuel economy standards that arethe automobile fuel economy standards program, NHTSA docketCorporate Average Fuel Economy Standards Docket No. NHTSA

Wenzel, Thomas P

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Review: Hydrogen Codes and Standards  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A PowerPoint presentation given as part of the 2005 Hydrogen Program Review, May 24, 2005, in Washington, D.C.

Ohi, J.

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

April 2004 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE Technical Standards recently sent for coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 7 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 8 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 12 National Fire Protection Association 12 ry DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 03-26-2004 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 37 Out for Comment - 21 Published in March - 2 5-Year Review Status Revision in Progress - 13 Reaffirmation inProgress - 26 Cancellation Pending - 1

58

NIST Global Standards Information Global Standards News  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Smart Grid Cyber Security Strategy Open for Public Review and Comment. ... Learn more about the Smart Grid Interoperability Panel (SGIP). ...

59

The Standards Actions, February 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UN UN I T E D S T A T ES O F A M E R IC A D E P A R T M E NT O F E N E R G Y February 1997 Standards DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Standards Managers (TSM) will provide selected reviewers with copies for comment. If you wish to comment on a particular document, please notify your TSM. DOE documents sent for coordination during the past month are given below. * Radiological Control, SAFT- 0039, (Judith Foulke, EH-52, 301-903-5865, Judy.Foulke@hq.doe.gov); comments due May 23, 1997 . DOE Standards and Other Documents DOE employees and DOE contractors may obtain copies from the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; telephone 423-576-8401 or FAX 423-576-5728. Subcontractors and the general public may obtain copies from

60

The Standards Actions, November 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Standards Managers (TSM) will provide selected reviewers with copies for comment. If you wish to comment on a particular document, please notify your TSM. DOE documents sent for coordination during the past month are given below. * Supplementary Guidance and Design Experience for DOE Fusion Safety Standards, SAFT-0059, (Steve Herring, INEL, 208-525-9497, sth@inel.gov. * Risk-Based Prioritization of DOE Activities, MISC-0022, (Kenneth P . Ferlic, DP-45, 301-903-6703, Kenneth.Ferlic@dp.doe.gov); comments due November 4, 1996. Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: * DOE-STD-1095-95, Department of Energy Laboratory Accredi- tation Program for Personnel Dosimetry Systems, December

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

The Standards Actions, April 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Standards Managers (TSM) will provide selected reviewers with copies for comment. The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Pro- gram Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this docu- ment, please notify your TSM. * Radiological Safety Training for Radiation Producing Devices, 6910-0057, (Peter O'Connell, EH-52, 301-903-5641, Peter.O'Connell@eh.doe.gov); comments due April 29, 1997. DOE Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: * DOE-STD-3020-97, Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors, January 1997. * DOE-HDBK-1200-97, Guide to Good Practices for Developing

62

April 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notices 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 1 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 3-28-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 25 Out for Comment - 11 Published in March - 0 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-6 Revisions in Progress-4 Proposed for Reaffirmation-3 Reaffirmations in Progress-24 Cancellations Pending-11 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards

63

August 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 07-26-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 22 Out for Comment - 16 Published in July - 2 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-9 Cancellation in Progress-0

64

August 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 07-27-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 27 Out for Comment - 24 Published in June - 0 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at

65

October 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 09-27-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 26 Out for Comment - 27 Published in September - 0 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at

66

EP&R Standards Project Report: Technical Review of National Incident Management Standards  

SciTech Connect

The importance and necessity for a fully developed and implemented National Incident Management System (NIMS) has been demonstrated in recent years by the impact of national events such as Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Throughout the history of emergency response to major disasters, especially when multiple response organizations are involved, there have been systemic problems in the consistency and uniformity of response operations. Identifying national standards that support the development and implementation of NIMS is key to helping solve these systemic problems. The NIMS seeks to provide uniformity and consistency for incident management by using common terminology and protocols that will enable responders to coordinate their efforts to ensure an efficient response.

Stenner, Robert D.

2007-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

67

August 2001 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-31-2001 7-31-2001 Activity Summary In Conversion-4 In Preparation-43 Out for Comment-17 Published this Month-0 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress-6 Reaffirmation in Progress-23 Cancellation Pending-4 Cancellation in Progress-12 Proposed for Cancellation-13 No Current Action-11 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Reaffirmed 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 2 American National Standards Institute 2 American National Standards 4 American Society for Testing and Materials 5 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- August 2001 Standards

68

Microsoft Word - MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review 5-29-2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

111 Wilson Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703.558.0400 Fax: 703.558.0401 111 Wilson Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703.558.0400 Fax: 703.558.0401 http://www.manufacturedhousing.org info@mfghome.org U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program Mailstop EE-2J 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585-1585 May 29, 2012 Reference: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed as a part of its implementation of Executive Order

69

The Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Plants (SRP-LR) provides guidance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff reviewers in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. These reviewers perform safety reviews of applications to renew nuclear power plant licenses in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54. The principal purposes of the SRP-LR are to ensure the quality and uniformity of staff reviews and to present a well-defined base from which to evaluate applicant programs and activities for the period of extended operation. The SRP-LR is also intended to make information about regulatory matters widely available, to enhance communication with interested members of the public and the nuclear power industry, and to improve public and industry understanding of the staff review process. The safety review is based primarily on the information provided by the applicant in a license renewal application. Each of the individual SRP-LR sections addresses (1) who performs the review, (2) the matters that are reviewed, (3) the basis for review, (4) the way the review is accomplished, and (5) the conclusions that are sought.

Power Plants

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

February 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Technical Standards Program Document Status 1-18-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 25 Out for Comment - 10 Published in January - 3 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-6 Revision in Progress-4 Proposed for Reaffirmation-3 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-16 Cancellation in Progress-0 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ February 2005 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects,

71

July 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 06-28-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 23 Out for Comment - 14 Published in June - 0 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-9 Cancellation in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/ techstds/ July 2006 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects,

72

Standards Actions, July 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-27-2001 6-27-2001 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 42 Out for Comment - 15 Published this Month - 1 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 4 Reaffirmation in Progress - 2 Supersedure in Progress - 6 Cancellation Pending - 8 Cancellation in Progress - 2 No Current Action - 35 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Published 1 American National Standards Institute 2 American National Standards 3 American Society for Testing and Materials 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. July 2001 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated

73

Standards Actions - April 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-28-2002 3-28-2002 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 44 Out for Comment - 13 Published this Month - 2 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 4 Reaffirmation in Progress - 2 Supersedure in Progress - 6 Cancellation Pending - 8 Cancellation in Progress - 2 No Current Action - 35 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Project Canceled 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Published 2 American National Standards Institute 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- April 2002 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Project Canceled

74

The Standards Actions, November 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sent Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Standards Managers (TSM) will provide selected reviewers with copies for comment. The full text of these documents is available on the Technical Standards Program Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • Guidance for Identifying, Reporting, and Tracking Nuclear Safety Noncompliances (revision to DOE-HDBK-1089- 95), Project Number SAFT- 0066; Steve Zobel, EH-10; 301- 903-2615, FAX 301-903-0081, Steve.Zobel@hq.doe.gov; comments due December 19, 1997. • Integration of Safety and Health Into Facility Disposition Activi- ties, Vol. 1 - Technical Standard, Vol. 2 - Appendices, Project Number SAFT-0060; Tony Eng, EH-53; 301-903-4210, FAX 301-

75

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Residential Boilers Standards Residential Boilers Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is initiating the rulemaking and data collection process to consider amending the energy conservation standards for residential boilers. After concluding its initial review of the available information and public comments, DOE will publish either a notice of the determination that standards do not need to be amended, or a notice of proposed rulemaking including new proposed standards. 42 U.S.C. 6295(f)(4)(C) Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document regarding energy conservation standards for residential boilers. 78 FR 9631 (February 11, 2013).

76

DOE Standards Actions, February 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Standards Projects Initiated Technical Standards Projects Initiated The following DOE technical standards project was recently initi- ated. If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of this standard, please contact the persons listed below. • Definitions and Acronyms to Good Practices for Maintenance at DOE Nuclear Facilities, Project Number MNTY-0025; Charles B. Ramsey, EH-31; 301-903-5999, Chuck.Ramsey @hq.doe.gov. DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with cop- ies for comment. The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this docu-

77

January 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 12-27-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 22 Out for Comment - 26 Published in December - 4 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/

78

November 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 10-29-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 30 Published in October - 0 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/

79

February 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 01-28-2008 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 22 Out for Comment - 24 Published in January - 3 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/

80

Standards Actions, May 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-29-2002 4-29-2002 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 47 Out for Comment - 12 Published this Month - 6 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 10 Reaffirmation in Progress - 12 Supersedure in Progress - 0 Cancellation Pending - 7 Cancellation in Progress - 1 No Current Action - 20 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Published 1 American National Standards Institute 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- May 2002 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation The following documents are currently being reevaluated under the 5-year

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

May 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-25-2008 4-25-2008 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 26 Published in April - 2 Five Year Review status Proposed for Revision-4 Revision in Progress-3 Proposed for Reaffirmation-0 Reaffirmation in Progress-20 Cancellations Pending-6 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/ May 2008 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose

82

Standards Actions - August 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Standards Technical Standards Program Document Status (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) Activity Summary In Conversion – 4 In Preparation – 32 Out for Comment – 15 Published this Month – 1 5-year Reviews Revisions in Progress – 3 Reaffirmations in Progress – 0 Supersedures in Progress – 6 Cancellations Pending – 8 Cancellations in Progress – 2 No Current Action – 35 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of this standard, please contact the person listed below. Complete listings of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status are given in the Web Site referenced at the bottom of this page. To access these

83

Standards Actions - August 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Standards Technical Standards Program Document Status (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) Activity Summary In Conversion – 4 In Preparation – 32 Out for Comment – 15 Published this Month – 1 5-year Reviews Revisions in Progress – 3 Reaffirmations in Progress – 0 Supersedures in Progress – 6 Cancellations Pending – 8 Cancellations in Progress – 2 No Current Action – 35 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of this standard, please contact the person listed below. Complete listings of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status are given in the Web Site referenced at the bottom of this page. To access these

84

April 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-27-2008 3-27-2008 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 26 Published in March - 0 Five Year Review status Proposed for Revision-4 Revision in Progress-3 Proposed for Reaffirmation-0 Reaffirmation in Progress-20 Cancellations Pending-6 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/ April 2008 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose

85

July 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-27-2007 6-27-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 27 Out for Comment - 24 Published in June - 0 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed forReaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/ July 2007 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose

86

Notice of public meeting and additional opportunity for public review and comment for the WAPA Eastern Plains Transmission Project (DOE/EIS-0390)(06/04/07)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

792 Federal Register 792 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 106 / Monday, June 4, 2007 / Notices Training Activity Support System (STASS), Navy Personnel Command, Application for Tuition, the Marine Corps and Coast Guard personnel systems extracts, Assistance Form (NAVMC 10883), education counselors, educational institutions, Tuition Assistance Authorization Form (NAVEDTRA 1560/5), and Academic contractor. EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: None. [FR Doc. E7-10683 Filed 6-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork

87

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011

88

February 2001 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Technical Standards Program Document Status Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 35 Out for Comment - 18 Published this Month - 1 FY 2001 5-year Reviews Revisions in Progress - 2 Reaffirmations in Progress - 2 Supersedures in Progress - 6 Cancellations Pending - 11 Cancellations in Progress - 33 No Current Action - 16 DOE Technical Standards Project Canceled If you have any questions about this action, please contact the person listed be- low. The following DOE Technical Standards project was recently canceled: * EM Facility Hazard Categorization, Project Number SAFT-0029; EM Technical Standards Manager, John Serocki, 301-903-7999, John.Serocki@em.doe.gov, or Tom Wright, 301-903-3661, Tom.Wright@em.doe.gov. The need for this

89

October 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Publication Staff Roster 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 09-26-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 16 Published in September - 1 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-9 Cancellation in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/ techstds/ October 2006 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. To access

90

Comprehensive Summary and Analysis of Oral and Written Scoping Comments on the Hawaii Geothermal Project EIS (DOE Review Draft)  

SciTech Connect

This report contains summaries of the oral and written comments received during the scoping process for the Hawaii Geothermal Project (HGP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Oral comments were presented during public scoping meetings; written comments were solicited at the public scoping meetings and in the ''Advance Notice of Intent'' and ''Notice of Intent'' (published in the ''Federal Register'') to prepare the HGP EIS. This comprehensive summary of scoping inputs provides an overview of the issues that have been suggested for inclusion in the HGP EIS.

None

1992-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

91

Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Volume 4: peer review comments on technical report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report compares the energy use, oil use and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) with those of conventional, gasoline-powered vehicles (CVs) over the total life cycle of the vehicles. The various stages included in the vehicles` life cycles include vehicle manufacture, fuel production, and vehicle operation. Disposal is not included. An inventory of the air emissions associated with each stage of the life cycle is estimated. Water pollutants and solid wastes are reported for individual processes, but no comprehensive inventory is developed. Volume IV includes copies of all the external peer review comments on the report distributed for review in July 1997.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

National Incident Management System (NIMS) Standards Review Panel Workshop Summary Report  

SciTech Connect

The importance and need for full compliant implementation of NIMS nationwide was clearly demonstrated during the Hurricane Katrina event, which was clearly expressed in Secretary Chertoff's October 4, 2005 letter addressed to the State's governors. It states, ''Hurricane Katrina was a stark reminder of how critical it is for our nation to approach incident management in a coordinated, consistent, and efficient manner. We must be able to come together, at all levels of government, to prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from any emergency or disaster. Our operations must be seamless and based on common incident management doctrine, because the challenges we face as a nation are far greater than capabilities of any one jurisdiction.'' The NIMS is a system/architecture for organizing response on a ''national'' level. It incorporations ICS as a main component of that structure (i.e., it institutionalizes ICS in NIMS). In a paper published on the NIMS Website, the following statements were made: ''NIMS represents a core set of doctrine, principles, terminology, and organizational processes to enable effective, efficient and collaborative incident management at all levels. To provide the framework for interoperability and compatibility, the NIMS is based on a balance between flexibility and standardization.'' Thus the NIC is challenged with the need to adopt quality SDO generated standards to support NIMS compliance, but in doing so maintain the flexibility necessary so that response operations can be tailored for the specific jurisdictional and geographical needs across the nation. In support of this large and complex challenge facing the NIC, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) was asked to provide technical support to the NIC, through their DHS Science and Technology ? Standards Portfolio Contract, to help identify, review, and develop key standards for NIMS compliance. Upon examining the challenge, the following general process appears to be a reasonable approach for identifying and establishing existing standards that would be applicable to NIMS compliance. The suggested generalized steps to establishing existing SDO generated standards for NIMS compliance are: (1) establish search criteria from the NIMS and its support documents, (2) search SDO databases to identify key existing nationally and/or internationally recognized standards that have potential application to NIMS compliance needs, (3) review the identified standards against the specific component needs of the NIMS, (4) identify the pertinent aspects/components of those identified standards that clearly address specific NIMS compliance needs, (5) establish a process to adopt the pertinent standards, which includes the generation of formalized FEMA Guidance that identifies the specific NIMS component compliance needs addressed in the respective standard, (6) develop performance criteria for which to measure compliance with the identified NIMS components addressed by the respective adopted standard, and (7) adopt the standard, publish the guidance and performance criteria, and incorporate it into routine FEMA/NIC NIMS management operations. This review process will also help identify real gaps in standards for which new NIMS specific standards should be developed. To jump start this process and hopefully identify some key ''low hanging fruit'' standards the NIC could use to begin such a process, a panel of first-responder experts (familiar with the current standards of common use in the first-responder community) from various response disciplines was formed and a workshop held. The workshop included a pre-workshop information gathering process. This report discusses the workshop and its findings in detail.

Stenner, Robert D.; Kirk, Jennifer L.; Stanton, James R.; Shebell, Peter; Schwartz, Deborah S.; Judd, Kathleen S.; Gelston, Gariann M.

2006-02-07T23:59:59.000Z

93

Technical Review of Law Enforcement Standards and Guides Relative to Incident Management  

SciTech Connect

In an effort to locate potential law enforcement-related standards that support incident management, a team from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) contacted representatives from the National Institute of Standards-Office of Law Enforcement Standards (NIST-OLES), National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Secret Service, ASTM International committees that have a law enforcement focus, and a variety of individuals from local and regional law enforcement organizations. Discussions were held with various state and local law enforcement organizations. The NIJ has published several specific equipment-related law enforcement standards that were included in the review, but it appears that law enforcement program and process-type standards are developed principally by organizations that operate at the state and local level. Input is provided from state regulations and codes and from external non-government organizations (NGOs) that provide national standards. The standards that are adopted from external organizations or developed independently by state authorities are available for use by local law enforcement agencies on a voluntary basis. The extent to which they are used depends on the respective jurisdictions involved. In some instances, use of state and local disseminated standards is mandatory, but in most cases, use is voluntary. Usually, the extent to which these standards are used appears to depend on whether or not jurisdictions receive certification from a governing entity due to their use and compliance with the standards. In some cases, these certification-based standards are used in principal but without certification or other compliance monitoring. In general, these standards appear to be routinely used for qualification, selection for employment, and training. In these standards, the term Peace Officer is frequently used to refer to law enforcement personnel. This technical review of national law enforcement standards and guides identified the following four guides as having content that supports incident management: TE-02-02 Guide to Radio Communications Interoperability Strategies and Products OSHA 335-10N Preparing and Protecting Security Personnel in Emergencies NIJ 181584 Fire and Arson Scene Evidence: A Guide for Public Safety Personnel NIJ 181869 A Guide for Explosion and Bombing Scene Investigation In conversations with various state and local law enforcement officials, it was determined that the following National Fire Protection Association (NPFA) standards are generally recognized and tend to be universally used by law enforcement organizations across the country: NFPA 1600 Standard on Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs NFPA 1561 Standard on Fire Department Incident Management Systems NFPA 472 Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents (2008 Edition) NFPA 473 Standard for Competencies for EMS Personnel Responding to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents (2008 Edition)

Stenner, Robert D.; Salter, R.; Stanton, J. R.; Fisher, D.

2009-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

94

HOSPITAL VENTILATION STANDARDS AND ENERGY CONSERVATION: A REVIEW OF GOVERNMENTAL AND PRIVATE AGENCY ENERGY CONSERVATION INITIATIVES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents the results of a recent research project originally concerned with review of governmental initiatives for changes to hospital design and operation standards at both the federal and state levels. However. it quickly became apparent that concern with energy conservation was not impacting hospital environmental standards, especially at the state level, irrespective of the energy implications. Consequently, the study was redirected to consider all energy conservation initiatives directed toward design and operating practices unique to the hospital environment. The scope was limited to agency programs (i.e., not undertaken at the initiative of individual hospitals), applicable to non-federal public and private hospitals.

Banks, Robert S.; Rainer, David

1980-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

95

Standard  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standard Standard rock For at least two generations, the depth of underground muon experiments has been reduced to depth in "standard rock." This is by definition the overburden of the Cayuga Rock Salt Mine near Ithaca, New York, where K. Greisen and collaborators made seminal observations of muons at substantial depths[1]. Ref. 1 says only "Most of the ground consists of shales of various types, with average density 2.65 g/cm 2 and average atomic number 11." Menon and Murthy later extended the definition: Z 2 /A = 5.5, Z/A = 0.5, and and ρ = 2.65 g/cm 2 [2]. It was thus not-quite-sodium. Lohmann[3] further assumed the mean excitation energy and density effect parameters were those of calcium carbonate, with no adjustments for the slight density difference. We use their definition for this most important material. (Extracted from D.E. Groom, N.V. Mokhov, and S.I. Striganov,

96

Memo Issuance of EM Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MAR 2 4 201011 MAR 2 4 201011 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION FROM: DR. STEVEN L. KRAHN DEPUTY ASSISTANT SAFETY AND SECU EIVVIROIVMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Issuance of Environmental Management Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission critical projects/facilities. Effective management of these projects requires multiple disciplines to be integrated and engaged at various project lifecycle phases. These disciplines include project management, engineering, design, safety, environment, safeguards and security, and quality assurance. The lessons-learned to date from ongoing Headquarters (HQ) and Field project reviews [e.g., Construction Project

97

DOE-STD-3006-95; DOE Standard Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3006-95 3006-95 November 1995 SUPERSEDING DOE-STD-3006-93 November 1993 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-3006-95 i PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) FOREWORD 1. DOE 0 425.1 establishes the requirement to conduct Operational Readiness Reviews

98

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Responsibilities - August Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as DOEComponents") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

99

Development of a Shutdown Qualitative Risk Assessment Standard  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents development of a shutdown qualitative risk assessment (QLRA) standard. This standard has been developed in support of Working Group ANS-58.22 of the Standards Committee of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) in conjunction with ongoing efforts to develop a standard for low power and shutdown (LPSD) probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs). This Technical Update will provide a starting point for review and comment by the ANS Working Group and other interested parties on the proposed qual...

2007-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

100

The Standards Actions May 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

these documents is available on these documents is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • Guidance for Nuclear Criticality Safety Engineer Training and Qualification, SAFT-0070, Jerry McKamy, EH-34, 301-903-8031, Jerry.McKamy@eh.doe.gov. Comments are due June 19, 1999. • Review Guide for Criticality Safety Evaluations, SAFT-0071, Jerry McKamy, EH-34, 301-903-8031, Jerry.McKamy @eh.doe.gov. Comments are due June 19, 1999. DOE Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: • DOE-STD-1090-99, Hoisting and Rigging (Formerly Hoisting and Rigging Manual), March 1999 (superseding DOE-STD-1090-96, September 1996). • DOE-STD-1111-98, The Department of Energy Laboratory Ac-

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

International Review of the Development and Implementation of Energy Efficiency Standards and Labeling Programs  

SciTech Connect

Appliance energy efficiency standards and labeling (S&L) programs have been important policy tools for regulating the efficiency of energy-using products for over 40 years and continue to expand in terms of geographic and product coverage. The most common S&L programs include mandatory minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) that seek to push the market for efficient products, and energy information and endorsement labels that seek to pull the market. This study seeks to review and compare some of the earliest and most well-developed S&L programs in three countries and one region: the U.S. MEPS and ENERGY STAR, Australia MEPS and Energy Label, European Union MEPS and Ecodesign requirements and Energy Label and Japanese Top Runner programs. For each program, key elements of S&L programs are evaluated and comparative analyses across the programs undertaken to identify best practice examples of individual elements as well as cross-cutting factors for success and lessons learned in international S&L program development and implementation. The international review and comparative analysis identified several overarching themes and highlighted some common factors behind successful program elements. First, standard-setting and programmatic implementation can benefit significantly from a legal framework that stipulates a specific timeline or schedule for standard-setting and revision, product coverage and legal sanctions for non-compliance. Second, the different MEPS programs revealed similarities in targeting efficiency gains that are technically feasible and economically justified as the principle for choosing a standard level, in many cases at a level that no product on the current market could reach. Third, detailed survey data such as the U.S. Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) and rigorous analyses provide a strong foundation for standard-setting while incorporating the participation of different groups of stakeholders further strengthen the process. Fourth, sufficient program resources for program implementation and evaluation are critical to the effectiveness of standards and labeling programs and cost-sharing between national and local governments can help ensure adequate resources and uniform implementation. Lastly, check-testing and punitive measures are important forms of enforcement while the cancellation of registration or product sales-based fines have also proven effective in reducing non-compliance. The international comparative analysis also revealed the differing degree to which the level of government decentralization has influenced S&L programs and while no single country has best practices in all elements of standards and labeling development and implementation, national examples of best practices for specific elements do exist. For example, the U.S. has exemplified the use of rigorous analyses for standard-setting and robust data source with the RECS database while Japan?s Top Runner standard-setting principle has motivated manufacturers to exceed targets. In terms of standards implementation and enforcement, Australia has demonstrated success with enforcement given its long history of check-testing and enforcement initiatives while mandatory information-sharing between EU jurisdictions on compliance results is another important enforcement mechanism. These examples show that it is important to evaluate not only the drivers of different paths of standards and labeling development, but also the country-specific context for best practice examples in order to understand how and why certain elements of specific S&L programs have been effective.

Zhou, Nan; Zheng, Nina; Fridley, David

2012-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

102

The Standards Actions, February 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

standards project was recently can- standards project was recently can- celed. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the persons listed below. • Software Quality Assurance Requirements, Procedures, and Guidelines, Project QCIC-0008; Burton Rothleder, EH-31, 301- 903-3726, FAX 301-903-9523, Burton.Rothleder@hq.doe.gov. DOE Technical Stan- dards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with cop- ies for comment. The full text of these documents is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • DOE Handbook Design Considerations, Project Number EDCN-0001; Richard Stark, EH-31; 301-903-4407, FAX 301-

103

The Standards Actions, August 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

standard project was recently can- standard project was recently can- celed. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the persons listed below. • Guidelines for Preparing Criti- cality Safety Evaluations at De- partment of Energy Non-Reac- tor Nuclear Facilities, Project Number SAFT-0069; Jerry McKamy, EH-34, 301-903-8031, Jerry. McKamy@hq.doe.gov. DOE Technical Stan- dards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with cop- ies for comment. The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. • Tritium Handling and Safe Storage, Project Number SAFT-0054;

104

CERTS 2012 Program Review - Reliability Standards Analysis and Assessment - Gil Tam, EPG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12-13, 2012 12-13, 2012 Washington, DC FY12 DOE/CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review Research Projects Reliability Standards Analysis and Assessments  Frequency Response Event Collection and Analysis  NERC Interconnections 2011 Annual Grid Reliability Performance Analysis and Report Page 1 Reliability Standards Analysis and Assessment  Objective: Support the NERC committees/groups (Resource Subcommittee and RS- Frequency Working Group) in the following ways: - Perform grid reliability metrics analysis using data collected in CERTS applications as requested by the RS - Analyze collected data to assess reliability performance at different levels - Interconnection, Reliability Coordinator, Balancing Authority - Perform analysis, testing, and monitoring of current and proposed

105

ASHRAE's Residential Ventilation Standard: Exegesis of Proposed Standard 62.2  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In February 2000, ASHRAE's Standard Project Committee on "Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings", SPC 62.2P7 recommended ASHRAE's first complete standard on residential ventilation for public review. The standard is an attempt by the Society to address concerns over indoor air quality in dwellings and to set minimum standards that would allow for energy efficiency measures to be evaluated. The standard has requirements for whole-house ventilation, local exhaust ventilation, and source control. In addition to code-intended requirements, the standard also contains guidance information for the designer and/or user of the standard. This report summarizes the draft standard and attempts to address questions and concerns that those potentially affected by the standard might have. This report may also be of use to those considering public review comments on the draft standard.

Sherman, M.

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

International Review of the Development and Implementation of Energy Efficiency Standards and Labeling Programs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

at the Asian Energy Efficiency Standards and Labeling Forum.Efficiency Labels and Standards: A Guidebook for Appliances,Labeling and Appliance Standards Program (CLASP). Wilkenfeld

Zhou, Nan

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

These comments will be compiled, reviewed, and posted to the LCFS website in a timely mannerPRELIMINARY DRAFT DISTRIBUTED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT.................................................................................  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Version 1.0PRELIMINARY DRAFT DISTRIBUTED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Preliminary draft version developed by Alternative Fuels Section of the California Air Resources Board for the Low Carbon

Canola To Biodiesel

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

The Standards Action - April 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Projects Canceled Projects Canceled The following DOE technical standard project was recently can- celed. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the person listed below. • Seismic Design and Evaluation Guidelines for High-Level Waste Storage Tanks, 6910-0035; Owen Thompson, EM-38, 301- 903-1926, FAX 301-903-7604, Owen.Thompson@em.doe.gov. DOE Technical Stan- dards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with cop- ies for comment. The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. • Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-Bearing

109

Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Retail Supplier Savings Category Commercial Heating & Cooling Manufacturing Buying & Making Electricity Bioenergy Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Water Wind Solar Program Info State Ohio Program Type Renewables Portfolio Standard Provider Ohio Public Utilities Commission '''''Note: Legislation passed in 2012 (S.B. 289 and S.B. 315) added certain new technologies to the list of eligible Renewable Energy Resources and Advanced Energy Resources. In July 2012, The PUCO opened [http://dis.puc.state.oh.us/CaseRecord.aspx?CaseNo=12-2156 Docket 12-2156-EL-ORD] in order to implement the changes. PUCO is accepting comments on the proposed rules, and comments reviewing OAC 4901:1-10, until

110

Renewable Portfolio Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Portfolio Standard Renewable Portfolio Standard Renewable Portfolio Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Retail Supplier Savings Category Bioenergy Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Solar Home Weatherization Wind Program Info State Massachusetts Program Type Renewables Portfolio Standard Provider Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources NOTE: NOTE: In February 2013, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) issued proposed changes to its RPS Class I and RPS Solar Carve-Out programs. The DOER accepted comments through March 25, 2013. In addition, the DOER has developed a draft Assurance of Qualification Guideline and an emergency regulation to provide clarity to the queuing and review process as Solar Carve-Out cap is approached. All drafts, comments,

111

web_comments.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rec Type Rec Type Recommendations/ Comments Name Organization 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Future reliability standards must strike a balance between detailed, rigid requirements, which provide little or no latitude for deviation, and standards, which are objective-based and allow for innovation and invention to achieve intended goals. Each standard should identify its importance on the BPS reliability in terms of the potential short-term (operating time horizon) vs. long-term (planning time horizon) impacts of non-compliance. Ajay Garg, Mike Penstone Hydro One Networks Inc. 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Core Reliability Standards: comprising a small number of technical standards designed to enable the BPS to withstand and recover from unexpected contingencies. Core Reliability

112

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-7 Comment Resolution Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. COMMENT RESOLUTION ............................................................................................................ 1

113

The standards forum: Volume 6, Number 3 -- December 1998  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This issue contains the following articles: NIST--A call for a national standards strategy; Fourth integrated safety management lessons learned workshop; TSP [Technical Standards Program] publications support moves to headquarters; Comments on the role of the federal government in environmental technology development; Technical standards manager spotlight; Topical committee developments: Quality assurance topical committee plays an active role in the TSP, New DOE accreditation committee targets issues and resolutions at first annual meeting, DOE fire safety committee meeting in New Orleans, Third annual DOE metrology committee meeting coming in March 1999, The biota dose assessment committee providing a major forum and technical resource for DOE, and A performance-based management handbook in the works; DOE technical standards projects initiated; Recently published DOE documents; Non-government standards: American National Standards Institute and American Society for Testing and Materials; Most DOE comments on ISO 17025 upheld by ANSI review committee; and ISO 9000 compliance--Changes in the future.

NONE

1998-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Decommissioning Standard Review Plans and Risk-Informing Decommissioning Regulation: Selected 1999 Industry/NRC Decommissioning Lice nsing Interactions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes the technical support EPRI provided the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Decommissioning Working Group in 1999. This volume includes two initiatives that produced four draft Decommissioning Standard Review Plans (DSRPs). It also includes an evaluation entitled Spent Fuel Pool Seismic Failure Frequency in Support of Risk-Informed Decommissioning -- Emergency Planning.

1999-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

115

Review of Consensus Standard Spectra for Flat Plate and Concentrating Photovoltaic Performance  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Consensus standard reference terrestrial solar spectra are used to establish nameplate ratings for photovoltaic device performance at standard reporting conditions. This report describes reference solar spectra developed in the United States and international consensus standards community which are widely accepted as of this writing (June 2011).

Myers, D.

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

COMMENTS OF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coordination of Federal ) Authorizations for Electric ) 10 CFR Part 900 Transmission Facilities ) (RIN 1901-AB18) COMMENTS OF THE STAFF OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE INTERIM FINAL RULE INTRODUCTION The Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California ("CPUC") hereby provides its comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Interim Final Rule on Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities, which was published in the Federal Register on Friday, September 19, 2008. The CPUC is a constitutionally established agency charged with the responsibility for regulating electric corporations within the State of California. In

117

Review of the thermal energy standards for manufactured housing proposed by the Manufactured Housing Institute Consensus Committee  

SciTech Connect

Congress passed legislation that requires the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to revise the energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing contained in the Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards (MHCSS). The Manufactured Housing Institute's Consensus Committee (MHICC) proposed revised standards to HUD based on an analysis contained in a 1989 report by E. Levy. This document is primarily a review of the Levy report, including the methods and inputs to that analysis. The approach to be used in developing the revised standard was specified by Congress as a cost-benefit analysis in which the costs of energy efficiency measures (EEM) were balanced against the benefits of energy savings. The resulting optimum specified an overall level of energy efficiency in terms of a maximum allowable building shell U-value (overall thermal transmittance) that produced the lowest life-cycle cost to the owner of a manufactured home. In his 1989 analysis, this was the general approach used by Levy.

Conner, C.C.

1992-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Public comments on the proposed 10 CFR Part 51 rule for renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses and supporting documents: Review of concerns and NRC staff response. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff review of public comments provided in response to the NRC`s proposed amendments to 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 51, which establish new requirements for the environmental review of applications for the renewal of operating licenses of nuclear power plants. The public comments include those submitted in writing, as well as those provided at public meetings that were held with other Federal agencies, State agencies, nuclear industry representatives, public interest groups, and the general public. This report also contains the NRC staff response to the various concerns raised, and highlights the changes made to the final rule and the supporting documents in response to these concerns.

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement John Cymbalsky, Ashley Armstrong, and Laura Barhydt US Department of Energy January 31, 2011 Presentation Outline Presentation Outline * Upcoming Relevant Rulemakings * Changes to Rulemaking Process * Executive Order 13563 * Overview of Compliance, Certification, and Enforcement * Detailed Questions and Answers 2 | U.S. Department of Energy energy.gov Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Appliance Standards Product Categories Driver Approx. Rule Initiation Date Final Action Date Heating Products Rulemakings Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool

120

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement John Cymbalsky, Ashley Armstrong, and Laura Barhydt US Department of Energy January 31, 2011 Presentation Outline Presentation Outline * Upcoming Relevant Rulemakings * Changes to Rulemaking Process * Executive Order 13563 * Overview of Compliance, Certification, and Enforcement * Detailed Questions and Answers 2 | U.S. Department of Energy energy.gov Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Appliance Standards Product Categories Driver Approx. Rule Initiation Date Final Action Date Heating Products Rulemakings Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Office lighting: A review of 80 years of standards and recommendations  

SciTech Connect

This paper traces the development of quantitative office lighting standards from its beginnings to the present. It discusses the sources of recommended lighting practice, the nature of the quantitative recommendations, and trends in recommended values on a comparative basis. A critical assessment of contemporary standards is provided within this historical context.

Osterhaus, W.K.E.

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

122

RFI Comments ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... 1-4 XMPP Interface Standard and its built-in capabilities against cyber-attack. The standard is a secure data transformation approach, providing ...

2013-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

123

Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of the Natural Resource...

124

Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of...

125

2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing - Tom Basso, NREL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing Tom Basso, NREL (June 7, 2012) December 2008 Smart Grid Standards and Testing Objective Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) FY11, authorized FY12, authorized FY13, requested Out-year(s) (FY 14-FY15) 1,000 1,100 1,100 2,300 Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) Support the evolution of the electric power system infrastructure to an interoperable system that modernizes the grid, enhances its security and reliability, facilitates recovery from disruptions, provides for customer participation and choice in load management. National and international standards and best practices, and, conformance testing for: two-way communications and power flow; operating practices; interconnection, integration, and interoperability of power,

126

DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is now interested in receiving comment on the suggestions and comments received from outside parties. Those comments and suggestions are posted on the Office of the General Counsel website: Retrospective Review of Regulations. On January 31, 2011, the Department took two steps to launch its

127

Microsoft Word - S07803_Comments  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

LMS/MNT/S07803 LMS/MNT/S07803 DOE Responses to April 13, 2011 BTAG Technical Review Comments on Monticello Mill Tailings Site, Operable Unit III, Biomonitoring Program Status and Analytical Update, March 2011 May 2011 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy DOE Responses to BTAG Technical Review Comments May 2011 Doc. No. S07803 Page 1 Preface The following documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Legacy Management (LM) responses to joint comments received from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) on the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS) Operable Unit (OU) III Biomonitoring Program Status and Analytical Update, March 2011. EPA, UDEQ, and FWS

128

EA-1871: 10 CFR 433, Energy Efficiency Standards for New Federal...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

impacts of revising the Federal building energy efficiency standards to the ASHRAE 90.1-2007 and IECC 2009. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities...

129

PEER-REVIEW Comparison of U.S. EPA and European Emission Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

or % reduction 85% 85% 85% 85% CO ppmv 100 100 100 100 NOx ppmv no limit 200( 2 ) no limit 150m S02 ppmv or 80 89 NOx mgINm3 N/A 292(2) N/A 219 S02 mgINm3 or 162.6 or 63 or 6 1 or 61 or % reduction 50% 75% 80% 80 standards as published on 12/19/96. The standards listed in Table 1 reflect the maximum reduction

Columbia University

130

All other interested parties INVITATION TO COMMENT ON IFACS INTERNATIONAL AUDITING AND ASSURANCE STANDARDS BOARD (IAASB) DISCUSSION PAPER The Evolving Nature of Financial Reporting: Disclosure and its Audit Implications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Assurance Standards Committee is seeking comments on the IAASB Discussion Paper which has been posted on the Institutes website at: www.hkicpa.org.hk/professionaltechnical/assurance/exposuredraft/. This Discussion Paper highlights recent trends in the range, volume, and complexity of financial statement disclosures, and explores issues and practical challenges in preparing, auditing, and using them. It begins with a discussion of recent trends in financial reporting and their impact on financial statement disclosures. It then discusses how the International Standards on Auditing currently deal with disclosures. The remainder of the Discussion Paper focuses on audit issues that the IAASB has identified regarding disclosures required by a financial reporting framework. The Discussion Paper addresses critical issues such as challenges in preparing disclosures, the nature and extent of evidence for different types of disclosures, and the application of the concept of materiality to disclosures. Views from all stakeholders are sought, and the discussion paper asks specific questions of preparers; investors, lenders, and other creditors; regulators; and auditors.

Steve Ong

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Trial Plant Review of an American Nuclear Society External Event Probabilistic Risk Assessment Standard  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This study examined a representative set of Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessments (SPRAs) and Seismic Margin Assessments (SMAs) performed for U.S. nuclear plants and evaluated them against the American Nuclear Society's draft External-Event PRA Methodology Standard for conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment of external events.

2003-09-22T23:59:59.000Z

132

Extending fieldbus standards to food processing and packaging industry: A review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Several fieldbus systems based on different standards are in use since a decade. Bearing in mind that a dedicated fieldbus for food plant operation and management (FOAM) does not exist, this paper highlights their applications in this sector. In recent ... Keywords: Automation, Fieldbus, Food industry, Operation and management

N. P. Mahalik; Matthew Yen

2009-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

Purpose: To provide the Agreement States with the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME) Procedure SA-110, Reviewing the Non-Common Performance Indicator,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Background: Proposed revision of FSME Procedure SA-110 with tracked changes. Discussion: This document describes the procedure for conducting reviews of NRC and Agreement State uranium recovery program activities for the Non-Common Performance Indicator, Uranium Recovery Program. This procedure is being updated to reflect NRC organizational changes; current policies and procedures, and to provide clarifying guidance. Please provide your written comments on the draft revision of FSME Procedure SA-110 to the point of contact below. We would appreciate receiving your comments within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this communication, please contact me at 301-415-3340 or the individual named below.

Uranium Recovery Program; Robert J. Lewis

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

comments to the draft Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SE-93) and the Terms of Reference of the Reliability Standards Auditing Working Group (RSAWG) regarding the Compliance Auditing of Reliability Standards for Ontario Market Participants. Hydro  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

One offers the following comments for your consideration: 1. The first objective listed on page 2 of the draft engagement plan states that the stakeholder engagements goal is to provide stakeholders the opportunity to provide feedback to MACD on their business needs around the auditing process (e.g. audit preparation materials, timing of deadlines, etc). However, on page 1 of the plan, items such as evidentiary requirements and disclosure of audit results are listed as Out of Scope. Hydro One submits that these items and others are important parts of the audit process and should be discussed and agreed on so Ontario entities can prepare accordingly. 2. The last bullet in the Terms of Reference document states that the Working Group is meant to provide advice and as a result consensus is not a goal of the engagement. Hydro One submits that, considering that Market Rule amendments will need to be in place (including Stakeholders Engagement, Technical Panel and IESO Board of Directors approval) to allow MACD to proceed with audit activities in Ontario, the RSAWG is the appropriate group to discuss and reach

unknown authors

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

135

Methods for Estimating the Mean and the Standard Deviation of Wind Direction  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In a recent paid, the author reviewed methods for estimating the mean and the standard deviation of wind direction. Some comments on this subject are now added. If large sporadic eddy fluctuations do not occur in a sampling duration, we can ...

Yukihiro Mori

1987-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

136

Villanova Comments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... standards related to safety and health ... for performing electrical transmission work, nuclear facility ... at existing facilities, occupational and emergency ...

2012-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

137

Microsoft Comments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... ANSI, often working with NIST and other US Agencies. currently supports standards planning panels relating to biofuels. identity management. ...

2012-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

138

SAE Comments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Grid interoperability including J1772 SAE Electric Vehicle Conductive Charge ... Interoperability Standards to Support Plug-In Electric Vehicles. ...

2012-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

139

Intellegere comments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... and resulting international standard [Virtual Reality Modeling ... of an Application: ie, Metering information where ... industry) work on net centric issues. ...

2012-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

140

DOE-STD-1082-94; DOE Standard Preparation, Review, and Approval of Implementaiton Plans For Nuclear Safety Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

82-94 82-94 October 1994 DOE STANDARD PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615)576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95001461 DOE-STD-1082-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard has been prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of Steve

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the project evaluations and comments from the DOE Hydrogen Program 2004 Annual Program Review. Hydrogen production, delivery and storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; and education R&D projects funded by DOE in FY2004 are reviewed.

Not Available

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

NAESB comments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Specifically, FERC has directed participants in the wholesale gas and electric ... to shape the implementation of standards in a cost effective, efficient ...

2012-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

143

Building Technologies Office: Standards and Test Procedures  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

icon Public Meetings & Comment Deadlines Newsletter Recent Federal Register Notices Standards and Test Procedures The Department of Energy (DOE) establishes energy efficiency...

144

Earthjustice, Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Natural...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Earthjustice, Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Natural Resources Defense Council - Comments in response to DOE solicitation of views on the implementation of test procedure...

145

DOE Standards Actions, November 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Projects Canceled DOE Projects Canceled The following DOE Technical Standards project was recently can- celed. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the person listed below. • Worker Protection for Uranium Facilities, Project Number SAFT-0058; Peter O’Connell, EH-52; 301-903-5641, Peter .O’Connell@eh.doe.gov. This project was superceded by Guide of Good Practices for Oc- cupational Radiological Protec- tion in Uranium Facilities, Project Number SAFT-0072. DOE Technical Stan- dards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with copies for comment. The full text of these documents are available on the Technical Standards Pro- gram (TSP) Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page.

146

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ceiling Fans Energy Conservation Standards Ceiling Fans Energy Conservation Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering establishing energy conservation standards for residential ceiling fans. There are currently federal design standards and test procedures for ceiling fans, but no energy conservation standards. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a request for information regarding energy conservation standards for ceiling fans. 78 FR 62494 (October 22, 2013). Public Meeting Information No public meeting is scheduled at this time. Submitting Public Comments

147

Page comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

home/ home/ http://www.nersc.gov/users/computational-systems/hopper/updates-and-status/open-issues/resolved-error-message-modulecmd-switch-c-172-error-152-module-prgenv-cray-is-currently-not-loaded/#PageComment_97 > module list 2>&1 | grep Prg 32) PrgEnv-gnu/4.1.40 I ignore the error but It's a bit uncomfortable that the error takes screen the space here are my loaded modules: > module list Currently Loaded Modulefiles: 1) modules/3.2.6.6 2) xtpe-network-gemini 3) darshan/2.2.6 4) atp/1.6.2 5) switch/1.0-1.0401.36779.2.72.gem 6) shared-root/1.0-1.0401.37253.3.50.gem 7) pdsh/2.26-1.0401.37449.1.1.gem 8) nodehealth/5.0-1.0401.38460.12.18.gem 9) lbcd/2.1-1.0401.35360.1.2.gem 10) hosts/1.0-1.0401.35364.1.115.gem 11) configuration/1.0-1.0401.35391.1.2.gem 12) ccm/2.2.0-1.0401.37254.2.142 13)

148

Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Draft WVDP Vitrification Melter WIR Evaluation Comments on Draft WVDP Vitrification Melter WIR Evaluation 1 To provide greater transparency to the Department of Energy's (DOE) cleanup of nuclear legacy waste, DOE made the "West Valley Demonstration Project Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the Vitrification Melter" (Draft WIR Evaluation) available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. The public comments on the Draft WIR Evaluation were submitted to DOE by one individual and two organizations:  Raymond C. Vaughan, PhD.,  The West Valley Citizen Task Force, and  The Coalition on West Valley Nuclear Wastes.

149

Notice of Public Meetings and Additional Opportunity for Public Review and Comment for the Eastern Plains Transmission Project (DOE/EIS-0390) (01/19/07)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Federal Register 7 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices accepting Initial Tariff, Waiving Regulations and Granting Blanket Approvals. Filed Date: 01/05/2007. Accession Number: 20070108-0252. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 26, 2007. Docket Numbers: ER07-413-000. Applicants: Tampa Electric Company. Description: Tampa Electric Co submits Second Revised Sheet No. 6 to FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 6, to be effective 1/2/07. Filed Date: 01/05/2007. Accession Number: 20070108-0253. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 26, 2007. Docket Numbers: ER07-414-000. Applicants: Caledonia Power I, L.L.C. Description: Caledonia Power I, LLC submits notice of cancellation of its market-based rate tariff, FERC Electric

150

The EIS Comment-Response Process | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS. The EIS Comment-Response Process More Documents & Publications EIS Distribution Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada - Nevada Rail Transportation CorridorDOE/EIS-0250F-S2andFinal Envir

151

Tribal Comments Database  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Summary of all comments from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtables held between March 16 and April 14, 2011.

152

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

153

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

154

NIST Seeks Comments on Cryptography Standards ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... to access a secure system not by analyzing encrypted data, but by measuring other operating characteristics, such as precise power consumption. ...

2010-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

155

Reviewer Instructions:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reviewer Instructions: Reviewer Instructions: 1. All review comments to be provided electronically using this review form. 2. Focus the review on substantive issues within your disciplinary, regulatory, or policy area. 3. Look only at the portions relevant to your agency and the land under your management. The individual land management agencies will be amending land use plans or issuing a Record of Decision, so please don't alter the other agencies' roles and responsibilities. 4. Target the review on the adequacy and reasonableness of text and analyses within your disciplinary, regulatory, or policy area. Please be aware that this is a programmatic EIS. 5. All comments should be as specific as possible. Comments such as "text unclear" or "expand" do not provide sufficient

156

Private Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A 74BPrivate Citizen/Individual's Written Comments Private Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | 1 While anecdotal suggestions of health effects from wind turbine sound can be found online, No evidence exists regarding direct negative health effects associated with wind turbine sound in any peer reviewed, scientific papers or studies. Impacts to birds and bats are disclosed in Section 4.4.5.11-Migratory Birds - Direct and Indirect Effects by Alternative and 4.4.5.8-Bats - Direct and Indirect Effects by Alternative, respectively. Impacts to Birds and Bats will be minimized by MM-BIO-5 Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy. Additionally, refer to Appendix B-4: Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy (formerly known as the Avian and Bat

157

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

Public Comments on the proposed 10 CFR Part 51 rule for renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses and supporting documents: Review of concerns and NRC staff response. Appendices  

SciTech Connect

This volume contains several appendices. Appendix A contains the list of individuals and organizations providing comments at various stages of the rulemaking process. The names of commenters at the public meetings are listed in the order that they spoke at the meeting; those who submitted written comments are listed by docket number. Appendix B contains the summaries of comments made. Each comment summary is identified by a unique comment number. Appendix C presents the concerns and NRC staff responses. Each concern embodies one or more comments on similar or related issues. The associated comment numbers are referenced for each concern. The concerns are organized by topic areas. A three-letter identifier for the topic, followed by a number, is assigned to each concern.

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

Status of Revisions to ASHRAE Standard 62  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 62- 1989 "Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor air Quality", adopted in 1989, is widely used by HVAC engineers to determine ventilation rates for various occupancies. This standard has also been cited in court to help demonstrate compliance with state-of the- art indoor environmental design. In August 1996, ASHRAE released for public review Standard 62-1989R, the highly controversial proposed revisions to the Standard 62- 1989. Over 8,000 comments were received on the proposed revision. Due to the significant number of concerns expressed by ASHRAE members as well as others, ASHRAE withdrew the proposed new standard and placed the current standard in "continuous maintenance." As part of the continuous maintenance process ASHRAE is transforming the current Standard 62- 1989 from a design standard to code ready document. Furthermore, two code documents will be produced4ne for low-rise residential buildings and another for other types of occupancy. Finally, two new documents, a user's manual and an IAQ guideline, will be written concurrent with the code documents. The guideline document is intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance to designers while good IAQ practices not appropriate for codification will be incorporated into the guideline. It is likely that many of the provision in Standard 62-1989R will survive in some manner in one or more of the new documents to be produced. This paper will detail some of the more significant changes that were proposed in Standard 62-1989R and review the current state of standard development.

Gallo, F. M.

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation submits the following comments to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in hopes that their contribution can highlight and further the understanding of the DOE on the key role that integrated communications will play ineneabling utilities to deploy cost-effective long-term smart grid benefits. Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation More Documents & Publications Comments of Tendril Networks Inc Technical Standards Newsletter - September 2001

162

Comment on "Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Missing Energy and Acoplanar b-Jet Topology at $\\sqrt{s} = 1.96$ TeV"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A DO paper of 2008 is exemplarily commented to demonstrate the general risk that the development of a new paradigm for astroparticle physics can be hindered by the work of large collaborations. This paper allows sharp formulations because only the simplest Higgs variant is treated. PACS numbers: 01.10 Hx, 13.85 Rm, 14.80 Bn

E. Donth

2009-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

163

YERMOLAEV ET AL.: COMMENT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Comment on A statistical comparison of solar wind sources of moderate and intense geomagnetic storms at solar minimum and maximum by Zhang, J.-C.,

M. W. Liemohn; J. U. Kozyra; M. F. Thomsen; A. Elliott; J. M. Weyg; Yu. I. Yermolaev; M. Yu. Yermolaev; I. G. Lodkina

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

CRA Comments & Responses  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 - Hanford Tank Waste (31805) 10 Response to CRA Comments (51105) Enclosure 1 - Hanford Tank Waste (51105) Enclosure 2 - K-Basin Knock-Out Pot Sludge (51105)...

165

The Standards Actions, January 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Actions Actions Resistance of HVAC Air Ducts and Fittings (new standard); comments due February 6, 1996. * ISO/ASQC A3534-1, Statis- tics - Vocabulary and Sym- bols - Probability and Gen- eral Statistical Terms (new standard); comments due January 26, 1996. * ISO/ASTM/ASQC/NSF 14004, Environmental management systems - General guidelines on principles, systems and Technical Standards Program Document Status as of 12/31/95 Documents Recently Published The Technical Standards Program is sponsoring a project at OSTI to place all DOE technical standards (i.e., standards and handbooks) on the Internet. To date, 57 DOE technical standards have been placed on the Internet at the following address: http://apollo.osti.gov/ html/techstds/ techstds.html The following DOE technical standards have recently

166

DOE Directives, Regulations, and Standards Portal - Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Globe Image Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program Home Search Approved Standards Recently Approved RevCom Logo RevCom for TSP Drafts for Review Registered Projects...

167

Guidelines for preparing and reviewing applications for the licensing of non-power reactors: Standard review plan and acceptance criteria. NUREG - 1537, Part 2  

SciTech Connect

NUREG - 1537, Part 2 gives guidance on the conduct of licensing action reviews to NRC staff who review non-power reactor licensing applications. These licensing actions include construction permits and initial operating licenses, license renewals, amendments, conversions from highly enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium, decommissioning, and license termination.

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Conservation Standards Energy Conservation Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering developing energy conservation standards for residential furnace fans. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding energy conservation standards for residential furnace fans. 78 FR 64067 (October 25, 2013). DOE also published a notice of extension of the public comment period, extending the original comment deadline from December 24, 2013 to January 23, 2014. 78 FR 77607 (December 24, 2013).

169

OSTIblog Recent comments  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

comments/rss en Good to know comments/rss en Good to know http://www.osti.gov/home/ostiblog/mixing-sciencegov-coffee-and-laptop#comment-1222 I didn't know that kind of information is available on science.gov! This would be really helpful for my Dad who is now in his 70s and is always prescribed different drugs for common aging ailments. Thanks, Cathey! Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:20:57 +0000 comment 1222 at http://www.osti.gov/home The Manhattan Project -- Its Immediate Influences http://www.osti.gov/home/ostiblog/manhattan-project-its-immediate-influences#comment-1136 "The Manhattan Project -- Its Immediate Influences" and the Wikipedia article about the Manhattan Project do have something very specific in common. Please note that one of the Wikipedia 'References', under 'General,

170

August 1999 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

this document is available on the this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. * Design Criteria Standard for Electronic Records Manage- ment Software, Project Number INFT-0001; Carol Blackston, MA-42; 301-903-4294, FAX 301- 903-4101; Carol.Blackston @hq.doe.gov. Comments are due August 30, 1999. This stan- dard was adapted from the De- partment of Defense standard 5015.2 and tailored for specific DOE use. DOE Documents Recently Published The following DOE document has recently been published: * DOE-HDBK-3027-99, Integrated Safety Management Systems (ISMS) Verification - Team Leader's Handbook, June 1999. DOE employees and DOE contractors may obtain copies from the

171

WIPP CRA2009 Comments and Responses Enclosure 4 EPA Comment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

WIPP CRA2009 Comments and Responses Enclosure 4 EPA Comment Included in this Submittal.6.2, DOE states that the pcH of the WIPP brines is expected to be approximately 8.7... 1236... 1 #12; WIPP CRA2009 Comments and Responses Enclosure 4 EPA Comment Included

172

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS 402 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Safety, Codes and Standards Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Safety, Codes and Standards Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Safety, Codes and Standards Program: The Safety, Codes and Standards program supports research and development (R&D) that provides the critical information needed to define requirements and close gaps in safety, codes, and standards to enable the safe use and handling of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The program also conducts safety activities focused on promoting safety practices among U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) projects and the development of information resources and best practices. Reviewers recognized that the program continues to provide strong support in the following

173

Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS May 28, 2013 - 5:37pm Addthis Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS The U.S. Department of Energy is re-opening the public comment period for the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft ULP PEIS, DOE/EIS-0472D). DOE made the Draft ULP PEIS available for public comment on March 15, 2013 (78 FR 16500). The public comment period for the Draft ULP PEIS originally was to end on May 16, 2013, and an extension to May 31, 2013 was announced on April 23, 2013 (78 FR 23926). In response to a public request for additional review time, DOE re-opens the public comment period, which will now close on July 1,

174

DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 - Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 Updated 4/9/2012 DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE received comments on the draft DOE Challenge Home specifications and requirements from December 15, 2011 through January 31, 2012. This document summarizes the comments received, DOE's responses, and the resulting policy change, if any. All comments were reviewed. Similar comments were grouped together in the responses. Editorial comments and general observations were considered, but are not listed in the responses below unless they involved a significant clarification to the DOE Challenge Home provisions. DOE is not responsible for any typographical errors or omissions.

175

90915DOE 2010 Plan Comments.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 A B C D E F G H 9/15/2009 DOE URTAC: 2010 DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN COMMENTS (with assigned topic areas) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (& POLICY) TECHNOLO GY TRANSFER 2007, 2008, 2009 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMEN T METRICS & BENEFITS ASSESSMEN T 2010 PROGRAM Environment al and Prior Recommend ation Review ADMIN & EDITORIAL COMMENTS 2007 X X X 2008 X X 2009 X X X 2010 X X X X X X COMMENTS FROM DON SPARKS: The following areas are of importance: Unconventional Resource X 1. Resource Assessment X a. Resource assessment (p. 28) X b. Geosciences (p. 28) X c. Basin Analysis & Resource Exploitation (p. 29) X 2. Early Stage Research or novel concepts.... (p. 30) X 3. Develop and execute innovative approaches .......(p. 30) X Drilling/completion/water management

176

The Standards Actions, November 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The full text of The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. • Fire Protection Design Criteria, Project Number FIRP-0001 (re- vision of DOE-STD-1066-97), Dennis Kubicki, EH-51, 301- 903-4794, FAX 301-903-2239; Dennis.Kubicki@eh.doe.gov; comments due December 18, 1998. • Hoisting and Rigging, Project Number SAFT-0068, (revision to DOE-STD-1090-96), Pat Finn, EH-51, 301-903-9876, FAX 301-903-2239, Pat.Finn@eh.doc.gov; comments due December 4, 1998. DOE Technical Standards Recently Published The following DOE Technical Standard has recently been published: • DOE-STD-3007-93, Guidelines for Preparing Criticality Safety Evaluations at Department of Energy Non-Reactor Nuclear Fa-

177

Dairyland Power Cooperative comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comments Dairyland Power Cooperative comments Response comments from Dairyland Power Cooperative on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logisitical Reliability Dairyland...

178

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-7 Comment Resolution Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. COMMENT RESOLUTION........................................................................................................... 1

179

Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments, 1/18/11 Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments, 1/18/11 This Standard provides guidance and criteria for a standard approach to utlilization of probabilistic risk assessments in nuclear safety applications. This interim Standard was developed by a team of experts from the DOE Program Secretarial Offices and private industry. It has been reviewed by the DOE Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group and recommended by the working group to be issued for interim use and comment in order to allow DOE to take advantage of the insights it provides for control og risk assessments while it is being finalized and improved based

180

Appendix C - Comments and Responses  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

C C COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This appendix contains the comments that were received during the 30-day public comment period on the draft EA (March 22 through April 22, 2002) and their responses. Comments were obtained during the public meeting held in Carlsbad, New Mexico, on April 16, 2002, as well as from letters and electronic mail messages. The comment entries are organized according to comment categories. In compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and Council on Environmental Quality regulations, public comments on the draft EA were assessed individually and collectively. Some comments resulted in changes or modifications that have been incorporated into the final EA. Comments not requiring modifications to the EA resulted in a response to correct the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Microsoft Word - AppendixH_CommentResponse.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

NFSS Vicinity Property Report NFSS Vicinity Property Report October 2010 Doc. No. S06246 Page H-1 Responsiveness Summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties, New York: Review of Radiological Conditions at Six Vicinity Properties and Two Drainage Ditches on April 23, 2010, for public comment. Report availability was announced through a message to stakeholders sent on behalf of DOE by USACE. The announcement provided a 30-day comment period, closing on March 19, 2010. DOE extended the comment period to June 14, 2010, in response to multiple requests for additional time to review FUSRAP documentation. Twenty comments were received, of which five were from one stakeholder and two from

182

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant ETE Analysis Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Under contract with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), staff from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Sandia National Laboratory (SNL)-Albuquerque reviewed the evacuation time estimate (ETE) analysis dated April 2006 prepared by IEM for the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP). The ETE analysis was reviewed for consistency with federal regulations using the NRC guidelines in Review Standard (RS)-002, Supplement 2 and Appendix 4 to NUREG-0654, and NUREG/CR-4831. Additional sources of information referenced in the analysis and used in the review included NUREG/CR-6863 and NUREG/CR-6864. The PNNL report includes general comments, data needs or clarifications, and requests for additional information (RAI) resulting from review of the ETE analysis.

Diediker, Nona H.; Jones, Joe A.

2006-12-09T23:59:59.000Z

183

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Publication 9285.7-01D Publication 9285.7-01D January 1998 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments) Interim Office of Emergency and Remedial Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Revision No. 0 ii January 1998 NOTICE This document provides guidance to EPA staff. The guidance is designed to communicate National policy on the planning, reporting and review of Superfund risk assessments. The document does not, however, substitute for EPA's statutes or regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it cannot impose legally-binding requirements on EPA, States, or the regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based upon

184

Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Multi Canister Overpack (MCO) Design Review Completion Report - section 1 and 2  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the design reviews performed on the Multi-Canister Overpack and includes multiple appendices containing the Review Comment Record forms for each design review.

GOLDMANN, L.H.

1999-11-30T23:59:59.000Z

185

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

These reports summarize the comments of expert peer reviewers at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, where each year projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells...

186

DUF6 EIS Public Comment Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Form Public Comment Form The public comment period for the Depleted UF6 Supplemental Analysis is closed. The public comment form is no longer available. Sorry The...

187

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Public Health and Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada (40 CFR Part 197)--Final Rule Response to Comments Document #12;Yucca Mountain Standards Response to Comments Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada 40 CFR Part 197 June, 2001 Office of Radiation and Indoor Air U

188

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

extension of public comment period for reply comments. extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (''CSC'') including its obligation to contribute to an international supplementary fund in the event of certain nuclear incidents.The NOI provided a September 27, 2010, deadline for comments, which was subsequently extended to October 27, 2010 in response to a public

189

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (''CSC'') including its obligation to contribute to an international supplementary fund in the event of certain nuclear incidents.The NOI provided a September 27, 2010, deadline for comments, which was subsequently extended to October 27, 2010 in response to a public

190

GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Comment on Application (Optional) Comment on Application (Optional) < GRR‎ | Elements Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections 14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) The DOGGR Regional Board receives the option to comment on the application prior to the issuance of a Draft Project Approval Letter for review. The DOGGR Regional Board shall furnish any comments to the DOGGR State Board within 14 days of the applicant submitting the application. Logic Chain No Parents \V/ GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) (this page) \V/ No Dependents Under Development Add.png Add an Element Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6_-_Comment_on_Application_(Optional)&oldid=539608

191

EA and SOWP Comments  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

EA and SOWP Comments EA and SOWP Comments This document covers Knight Piisold's technical comments to the Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site (EA) and the Shiprock Site Observational Work Plan (SOWP). The major areas of concern include the following: 1. The contaminant sources on site may not be properly defined. In particular, the disposal cell and the residual vadose zone soil contamination need to be redefined in the conceptual model and the transport model. 2. The documents contain no compliance plan, making it difficult to ascertain if regulatory guidelines are being met. 3. The results of the risk assessment are not linked to the establishment of the remedial goals 4. The current design of the evaporation pond may pose environmental risks due to their

192

EIA-930 Comments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

30 Comments 30 Comments Tim Hattaway PowerSouth Energy Cooperative Page 1 PowerSouth Energy Cooperative appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Form EIA-930 report, ''Balancing Authority Operations Report''. We have several concerns with the proposed data collection effort. Some concerns PowerSouth has with the proposal are:  The DOE is seeking hourly information within minutes of the time that it becomes available to the BA in very raw form. Many times, we will not have the data available by 10-minutes after an hour due to meter error, communication glitches, etc. Providing the data in such a way will lead to many errors and gaps with the data being provided.  For a smaller sized BA such as PowerSouth, we are concerned by amount of work that will be

193

Draft WAPA Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Resource Advocates ● Natural Resources Defense Council ● Resource Advocates ● Natural Resources Defense Council ● Interwest Energy Alliance ● The Wilderness Society ● Western Grid Group Group Comments on Western Area Power Administration's Renewable Energy Transmission Program April 1, 2009 I. Introduction On behalf of Western Resource Advocates, Natural Resources Defense Council, Interwest Energy Alliance, The Wilderness Society and Western Grid Group, please accept the following comments in response to Western Area Power Administration's ("Western") Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments regarding the implementation of Section 402 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 74 Fed. Reg. 9391-9393 (Mar. 4, 2009). The 2009 Recovery Act specifically provides $3.25 billion in new borrowing authority for

194

DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Certification and Enforcement Notice Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking October 15, 2010 - 10:22am Addthis In response to a formal request, the Department has extended to October 29, 2010, the deadline for submission of comments in response to the Notice or Proposed Rulemaking on the certification and enforcement of the Department's energy conservation standards. (75 FR 56796). The signed extension provided here will be published shortly in the Federal Register. Addthis Related Articles DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act Department of Energy Issues Final Rule on Loan Guarantees

195

DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure June 30, 2010 - 3:02pm Addthis Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a draft interpretative rule clarifying its views on the application of the current residential clothes washer test procedure to machines that offer a warm rinse option that is not included in the recommended cycle for washing cotton or linen clothes. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here, until July 30, 2010. Addthis Related Articles DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead Save Energy and More with ENERGY STAR. ENERGY STAR clothes washers use 50% less energy to wash clothes than standard washing machines.

196

Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available April 3, 2012 - 2:12pm Addthis On October 5, 2011, the White House announced the creation of a Rapid Response Team for Transmission (RRTT). In support of the RRTT the Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability released a Federal Register Notice seeking information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. The Request for Information focused on making the development times for generation and transmission more commensurate with one another. Public comments received from the following organizations are now available for review and downloading. - Allegheny Highlands Alliance - American Electric Power

197

Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment March 15, 2013 - 11:08am Addthis Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment DOE has issued the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (ULP PEIS)(DOE/EIS-0472D) for public review and comment. The document is available here and on the ULP PEIS website. Under the Uranium Leasing Program, the DOE Office of Legacy Management administers 31 tracts of land in Mesa, Montrose, and San Miguel counties that are leased to private entities to mine uranium and vanadium. The program covers an area of approximately 25,000 acres. No mining operations are active on the ULP lands at this time. DOE is preparing the ULP PEIS to

198

PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-07-02: Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") has reviewed the Special Environmental Analysis ("SEA") referenced above, dated November, 2006, and is providing the following brief comments for your consideration as the Department of Energy ("DOE") continues to evaluate the operating status of the Potomac River

199

May 2010 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

200

May 2009 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2009 May 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

February 2009 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 2009 February 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

202

July 2009 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

203

Design review report for multiport riser final design review  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This design review examined the design documents contained in a notebook prepared for the final design review of the multiport riser assembly. This assembly will support the Hydrogen Mitigation Test program for mitigation of safety issues for Hanford Waste Tank 241-SY-101. The purpose of the Multiport Riser is to provide multiple access ports of several diameters in a single 42 inch riser for simultaneous access of test and support equipment. The notebook was titled: {open_quotes}Multiport Riser Final Design Review.{close_quotes} The review was conducted using a database comment registration system whereby the reviewer comments were entered into the database and each comment was given a unique identifier. During the review, each comment was referred to by its identifier. Changes to comments, responses, and actions needed were made with the agreement of the committee and the reviewers at the formal design review meeting held March 1, 1994. When the structural analyses were available, they were distributed for review which allowed closure of all design review comments. Approval of the design was achieved and supporting documents are included in this report.

McWethy, L.M.; Sheen, E.M.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

WRAP 2A advanced conceptual design report comments  

SciTech Connect

This report contains the compilation of the 393 comments that were submitted during the review of the Advanced Conceptual Design Report for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Module 2A. The report was prepared by Raytheon Engineers and Constructors, Inc. of Englewood, Colorado for the United States Department of Energy. The review was performed by a variety of organizations identified in the report. The comments were addressed first by the Westinghouse cognizant engineers and then by the Raytheon cognizant engineers, and incorporated into the final issue of the Advanced Conceptual Design Report.

Lamberd, D.L.

1994-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

205

Dual axis radiographic hydrodynamic test facility. Final environmental impact statement, Volume 2: Public comments and responses  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

On May 12, 1995, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued the draft Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility Environmental Impact Statement (DARHT EIS) for review by the State of New Mexico, Indian Tribes, local governments, other Federal agencies, and the general public. DOE invited comments on the accuracy and adequacy of the draft EIS and any other matters pertaining to their environmental reviews. The formal comment period ran for 45 days, to June 26, 1995, although DOE indicated that late comments would be considered to the extent possible. As part of the public comment process, DOE held two public hearings in Los Alamos and Santa Fe, New Mexico, on May 31 and June 1, 1995. In addition, DOE made the draft classified supplement to the DARHT EIS available for review by appropriately cleared individuals with a need to know the classified information. Reviewers of the classified material included the State of New Mexico, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Defense, and certain Indian Tribes. Volume 2 of the final DARHT EIS contains three chapters. Chapter 1 includes a collective summary of the comments received and DOE`s response. Chapter 2 contains the full text of the public comments on the draft DARHT EIS received by DOE. Chapter 3 contains DOE`s responses to the public comments and an indication as to how the comments were considered in the final EIS.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Microsoft Word - DOE Comments on IIP  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

David R. Moeller David R. Moeller Senior Attorney 218-723-3963 dmoeller@allete.com October 30, 2013 Julie A. Smith Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Mail Code: OE-20 United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: Minnesota Power's Comments Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53,436 (August 29, 2013) Dear Ms. Smith and Mr. Lawrence: Minnesota Power hereby provides comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") in the above-referenced Federal Register publication. Minnesota Power has been working closely with the DOE and other state and

207

Appendix C Draft EA Review and Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

shown includes CHP capability and significant reserve capability. Optimization of boilers without CHP and final engineered reserve capability will require slightly smaller...

208

Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

review of the Phase I DP for the West Valley Demonstration Project, Rev. I (Reference 1). DOE submitted responses to the other 38 of the 44 RAIs to NRC on August 13, 2009 (Reference 3). Enclosed are 20 paper copies of the RAI response package along with 20 compact disks. Each compact disk contains an electronic copy of the six RAI responses and two calculationQ t Dr. Keith 1. McConnell-3- September 16, 2009 For Further Information Please note that DOE's RAI responses and the proposed decommissioning approach are based on the preferred alternative in the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement for

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR LEASE OF LAND AND FACILITIES AT THE EAST TENNESSEE TECENOLOGY PARK OAK RIDGE,TENNESSEE @OE/EA-1175) NOVEMBER 1997. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE [blank page] CONTENTS 1 1 . INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 2. SCOPE AND ORGANIZATIONS ................................................... 3 3. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES .i ................................................. 5 3.1 DOE NEPA Review Process/Categorical Exclusions .............................. 5 3.1.1 SummaryofComments ............................................... 5 3.1.2 Response/Revisions .................................................. 5

210

The Standards Actions, October 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

cop- cop- ies for comment. The full text of these documents is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown below. If you wish to com- ment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • Radiological Control Technician Training, TRNG-0003, (Peter O’Connell, EH-52, 301-903- 5641, Peter.O’Connell@eh. doe.gov) comments due No- vember 16, 1998. • Guide to Good Practices for the Selection, Training, and Qualifi- cation of Shift Supervisors, TRNG-0009, (John A. Yoder, EH- 31, 301-903-5650, John.Yoder@eh.doe.gov) comments due November 18, 1998. Note that this document is a conversion and revision of DOE-STD-1061-93. DOE Documents Recently Published The following DOE document has recently been published: • DOE-HDBK-1114-98, Guide to Good Practices for Line and Train-

211

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standby and Off Mode Standby and Off Mode Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to establish test procedures for microwave ovens standby and off mode. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). This rulemaking is related to the microwave ovens standard and test procedure. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a final rule for test procedures for microwave ovens. 78 FR 4015 (January 18, 2013). Public Meeting Information No public meeting is scheduled at this time. Submitting Public Comments The comment period is closed.

212

EIS-0380: Notice to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0380: Notice to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico In response to requests for additional time to review and comment on the document, NNSA is extending the public comment period until September 20, 2006. DOE/EIS-0380, Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 76 FR 40352 (August 2006) More Documents & Publications EIS-0380: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental

213

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

by successfully pioneering distributed search across disparate, non-standardized sources. Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile320x340 Icon64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't...

214

EA-1881: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards 81: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts EA-1881: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to amend energy conservation standards for various consumer products and certain commercial and industrial equipment, including fluorescent lamp ballasts. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download October 20, 2011 EA-1881: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts (October 2011) October 5, 2011 EA-1881: Final Environmental Assessment Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent

215

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 16-19, 2006, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2005 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Chalk, S. G.

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

219

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). I have reviewed the Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). In the Department of Energy"s (DOE) attempt to meet its obligation to implement Executive Order 13563, ""Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,"" issued by the President on January 18, 2011, I recommend DOE make a bold move to change

220

Microsoft Word - CLWR scoping Comment  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be received on or before November...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant project Preliminary Safety Analysis Report comment response records  

SciTech Connect

The initial draft version of the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP) Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR) was issued for review and comment on July 17, 1989, and was designated as Revision A. Following resolution of comments arising from the Revision A review, the PSAR was revised as a final draft. This version, which was designated as HWVP PSAR, Revision B, was issued for review and comment on July 16, 1990. The PSAR was again revised as Revision O following the resolution of the Revision B comments. The HWVP PSAR, Revision O, was approved by Westinghouse Hanford Company (Westinghouse Hanford) on May 21, 1991, and issued as WHC-EP-0250, Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant Preliminary Safety Analysis Report to the Department of Energy-Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL). While Westinghouse Hanford organizations were reviewing the drafts of the HWVP PSAR (i.e., Revisions A and B), a parallel review was being performed by the DOE-RL on both versions. This supporting document provides a summary of the PSAR Comment Response Databases for the Westinghouse Hanford and DOE-RL reviews of HWVP PSAR, Revisions A and B. This document also provides copies of all the closed-out Review Comment Records (RCR) submitted by these organizations. 8 refs., 1 fig., 2 tabs.

Herborn, D.I.; Campbell, L.M.

1991-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

222

Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. On September 25, the public comment period was extended to October 31, 2013. Comments received are available below. Comments from Lee Cunningham, sent September 23, 2013 Comments from Patrick Ledger of Arizona's G&T Cooperatives, sent September 25, 2013

223

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide09 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-30 07:28 FY2010-cendi-jordan Slide09 E-Link Web-Based Reporting System * Documents the receipt, review and release...

224

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18 -22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia.

Satyapal, S.

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

225

COMMENTS OF THE BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Page 2 BONNEVILLES COMMENTS ON FORM EIA-930 II. Comments A. The Proposed Collection is not Necessary for Proper Performance of EIA Functions,

226

First Set of CRA Comments General Comments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(WIPP) continues to comply with EPA's environmental radiation protection standards for the disposal of radioactive waste. Pursuant to the 1992 WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA), as amended, the U.S. VerDate Nov the initial receipt of transuranic waste at WIPP. EPA initially certified that WIPP met applicable regulatory

227

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies Energy Conservation Standard Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is amending the current energy conservation standards for Class A external power supplies and establishing new energy conservation standards for battery chargers and non-Class A external power supplies. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). This Rulemaking is related to the Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies Standard and Test Procedure. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a request for information regarding energy conservation standards for battery chargers and external power supplies. 78 FR 18253 (March 26, 2013).

228

RFI Comments - X9  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... The Standard defines a constructive method for the creation of symmetric keys, by combining two or more secret key components. ...

2013-04-09T23:59:59.000Z

229

HFE Process Guidance and Standards for potential application to updating NRC guidance  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews and evaluates the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed to the periodic update and improvement of these guidance documents to ensure that they remain state-of-the-art design evaluation tools. Thus, the NRC has initiated a project with BNL to update the NRC guidance to remain current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology. INL supported Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) to update the detailed HFE review criteria contained in NUREG-0711 and NUREG-0700 based on (1) feedback obtained from end users, (2) the results of NRC research and development efforts supporting the NRC staffs HFE safety reviews, and (3) other material the project staff identify as applicable to the update effort. INL submitted comments on development plans and sections of NUREGs 0800, 0711, and 0700. The contractor prepared the report attached here as the deliverable for this work.

Jacques Hugo; J. J. Persensky

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

PCR - Ligation Assembly Standard for BioBrick Parts  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This Request for Comments (RFC) describes a novel method for the assembly of standard BioBrick parts. This assembly method for BioBrick parts is an improvement upon the conventional methods of BioBrick part assembly. This ...

He, Tony PeiYuan

2011-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

231

The Standards Actions, April 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

these documents is available on the Technical Standards Pro- these documents is available on the Technical Standards Pro- gram (TSP) Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • Content of System Design Descriptions, Project Number EDCO- 0001; John Fredlund, DP-45; 301-903-3059, FAX 301-903-8754, Fredlund@dpmail.dp.doe.gov, comments due May 15, 1998. DOE Documents Recently Published DOE employees and DOE con- tractors may obtain copies from the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; telephone 423-576-8401 or FAX 423-576-5728. Subcontractors and the general public may obtain copies from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, Na- tional Technical Information Ser- vice, Springfield, Virginia 22161;

232

NFR TRIGA package design review report  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to compile, present and document the formal design review of the NRF TRIGA packaging. The contents of this document include: the briefing meeting presentations, package description, design calculations, package review drawings, meeting minutes, action item lists, review comment records, final resolutions, and released drawings. This design review required more than two meeting to resolve comments. Therefore, there are three meeting minutes and two action item lists.

Clements, M.D.

1994-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

233

EVMS Surveillance Standard Operating Procedure (ESSOP) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reporting System (PARS II) INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating Procedures ICR-ICE Standard Operating Procedures (Update Sept 2013)...

234

NIST Posts Comments on Public Safety Communications ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Posts Comments on Public Safety Communications Network. From NIST Tech Beat: November 22, 2011. ...

2011-11-22T23:59:59.000Z

235

AR5 WGII Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WGII Review Print E-mail WGII Review Print E-mail Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report: Working Group II Introduction: The United States Global Change Research Program, in cooperation with the Department of State, request expert review of the Second Order Draft of the Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate Change 2013: Impacts, Adaptation and Vlunerability. Pre-register Today To be notified when the Second Order Draft of the Working Group II contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 5th Assessment report is available for review, please click here. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research Program is coordinating the submission of comments by U.S. experts to inform development of an integrated set of U.S. Government comments on the report. Expert comments must be received via the internet-based application by Midnight, Eastern Daylight Time, 1 May 2013 to be considered for inclusion in the U.S. Government submission. An expert reviewer may also be asked to participate in the government review organized within his or her own country. In such a case, he/she should submit comments either as an individual or as part of the government review, but not both.

236

AR5 WGIII Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WGIII Review Print E-mail WGIII Review Print E-mail Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report: Working Group III Introduction: The United States Global Change Research Program, in cooperation with the Department of State, request expert review of the Second Order Draft of the Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Pre-register Today To be notified when the Second Order Draft of the Working Group III contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 5th Assessment report is available for review, please click here. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research Program is coordinating the submission of comments by U.S. experts to inform development of an integrated set of U.S. Government comments on the report. Expert comments must be received via the internet-based application by Midnight, Eastern Daylight Time, 27 March 2013 to be considered for inclusion in the U.S. Government submission. An expert reviewer may also be asked to participate in the government review organized within his or her own country. In such a case, he/she should submit comments either as an individual or as part of the government review, but not both.

237

West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment March 11, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor (513) 246-0539 william.taylor@emcbc.doe.gov West Valley, New York - The U.S. Department of Energy today released a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) Evaluation of a vitrification melter at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) for review and comment by the public, states and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This draft evaluation shows that the melter meets the criteria for "waste incidental to reprocessing" and may be managed and disposed of as low-level radioactive waste (LLW). It is an important step in DOE's efforts to clean up the WVDP and meet its obligations under the WVDP Act of

238

Standards, Ethics  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standards, Ethics Ombuds Standards and Ethics Committed to the fair and equitable treatment of all employees, contractors, and persons doing business with the Laboratory. Contact...

239

Find Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

may not be available from IHS: AHRI standards - from the Air Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute AISC standards - from the American Institute of Steel Construction...

240

RFI Comments - Santee Cooper  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... As provided in Federal Power Act Section 215, the ... situational awareness, operations of the grid can be ... the crp Standards, and its extension to the ...

2013-04-09T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Joint CPUC PUCT Comments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... non-proprietary standards such as ZigBee, Home-Plug, or the ... Additionally, with the expected impacts of electric vehicles, solar, and related ...

2012-11-26T23:59:59.000Z

242

CA IOUs Comment Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 19, 2012 June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers.

243

Comments April 11.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tom or Julie Laub Tom or Julie Laub Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:09 PM To: contractor pensions Subject: Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge I'm sure you've heard this before but as for employee's of National Laboratories the total benefits package should not be limited to 5% above "market average." You do not want average employees at a National Laboratory--you want the best and the brightest. Don't count on a sense of national pride to keep the exceptional employee at a National Laboratory. It is hard to have national pride when your nation does not appreciate your hard work and special talents. You can make more money some place other than a National Lab so the benefits have to be the way appreciation is shown. Benefits at National Labs have been in decline

244

Public invited to comment on additional proposed modications to WIPP hazardous waste permit  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Invited to Comment on Additional Proposed Modifications Public Invited to Comment on Additional Proposed Modifications To WIPP Hazardous Waste Permit CARLSBAD, N.M., April 26, 2000 - The public is invited to comment on additional proposed modifications to the hazardous waste facility permit for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Earlier this month, DOE and the Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division requested -- through three Class 2 permit modification submittals -- that the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) change certain provisions of the state permit. On April 20, DOE and Westinghouse submitted to NMED three additional Class 2 permit modifications. The Class 2 submittals begin a formal review process that includes a 60-day public comment period and two separate public meetings. Written comments will be accepted by

245

Strategic Standardization  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Program Strategic Standardization Curriculum (CMGT 564 - 2010) ... com. Curriculum ks eport, 1992), Grading (Research paper, ...

2012-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

246

Hardness Standardization  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... metallic products. NIST produces a variety of hardness Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) for industry. The NIST ...

2013-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

247

DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

These comments are submitted by Rheem Manufacturing Company in response to the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) notice appearing in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information on...

248

AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012).

249

Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge Comments on Contractor Employee...

250

Comments from Edison Electric Institute | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments from Edison Electric Institute Comments from Edison Electric Institute Consolidated Comments of the Edison Electric Institute ("EEI") on (1) DOE Interim Final Rule, RIN...

251

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Comments made on behalf of the...

252

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx More Documents & Publications Before the...

253

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx More Documents & Publications Before...

254

ICR-ICE Standard Operating Procedures | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ICR-ICE Standard Operating Procedures ICR-ICE Standard Operating Procedures ICE-ICR SOP.pdf More Documents & Publications External Independent Review (EIR) Standard Operating...

255

Search for Standard Higgs Boson at Supercolliders  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We review the standard Higgs boson physics and the search for higgs boson at LEP and LHC supercolliders

N. V. Krasnikov; V. A. Matveev

1999-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

256

Operational Readiness Reviews  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Readiness Reviews Readiness Reviews Home Applicable Directives, Standards, & Handbooks Start Up Notifications, Plan of Actions, and Implementation Plans Functional Area CRADS...

257

The following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Sol  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces and accessories therefore. --- Ingersoll Rand appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's request for information on "Reducing Regulatory Burden" in the spirit of Executive Order 13563 ---- It is ironic that the response interval for the RFI on reducing regulatory burden overlaps the issuance of the Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment; Final Rule [the enforcement rule]. That rule

258

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide04 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 13:29 FY2011-Jordan Slide04 Founding Agencies in 2001 * Department of Agriculture * Department of Commerce * Department of Defense * Department of Education * Department of Energy * Department of Health and Human Services * Department of Interior * Environmental Protection Agency * National Aeronautics and Space Administration * National Science Foundation New Alliance Members * Department of Transportation * Library of Congress * United States Government Printing Office * National Archives and Records Administration Alliance only * United States Forest Service * National Institute of Standards and Technology Support and coordination by CENDI - an interagency forum of senior information managers Add new comment

259

A review of the Brazilian NBR 15575 standard: applying the simulation and simplified methods for evaluating a social house thermal performance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The new Brazilian ABNT NBR 15575 Standard recommends two methods for analyzing housing thermal performance: a simplified and a computational simulation method. The aim of this paper is to evaluate both methods and the coherence between each other. For ... Keywords: NBR 15575 standard, housing thermal performance simulation, thermal performance regulation

Tassia H. T. Marques; Karin M. S. Chvatal

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking The Institute for Market Transformation respectfully submits these comments on the Department of Energy's notice of proposed rulemaking on Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings. Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures Energy Conservation Standard Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering establishing new and amended energy conservation standards for metal halide lamp fixtures (MHLF). This activity is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309 seq). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding energy conservation standards for metal halide lamp fixtures. 78 FR 51463 (August 20, 2013). Public Meeting Information A public meeting was held on September 27, 2013.

262

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines Energy Conservation Standards Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines Energy Conservation Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering amending energy conservation standards for refrigerated beverage vending machines (BVMs) as required by (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document regarding energy conservation standards for refrigerated beverage vending machines. 78 FR 33262 (June 4, 2013). Public Meeting Information A public meeting was held on June 20, 2013.

263

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Energy Conservation Standard High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products High-intensity discharge (HID) lamps include mercury vapor (MV), metal halide (MH), and high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps. The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering establishing energy conservation standards for certain HID lamps. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). (42 USC 6311-6317) Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of interim technical support document regarding energy conservation standards for high-intensity discharge lamps. 78 FR 13566 (February 28, 2013).

264

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Low-Voltage Dry-Type Distribution Transformers Energy Conservation Standard Low-Voltage Dry-Type Distribution Transformers Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) has completed a rulemaking to amend the current energy conservation standards for liquid-immersed, medium-voltage dry-type, and low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers. This activity is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a final rule regarding amended energy efficiency standards for liquid-immersed, medium-voltage dry-type, and low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers. 78 FR 23335 (April 18, 2013). The distribution transformers final rule was the DOE's first "negotiated rulemaking," conducted under the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act.

265

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wine Chillers and Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products Standard Wine Chillers and Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is initiating a rulemaking to develop a potential test procedure and energy conservation standard for miscellaneous residential refrigeration products, which include wine chillers and other products that are not currently covered as residential refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, or freezers. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document regarding energy conservation standards for residential wine chillers and other residential refrigeration products. 77 FR 7547 (February 13, 2012).

266

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commercial and Industrial Pumps Energy Conservation Standards Commercial and Industrial Pumps Energy Conservation Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering developing test procedures, labels, and energy conservation standards for commercial and industrial pumps. Pumps exist in numerous applications, including agriculture, oil and gas production, water and wastewater, manufacturing, mining, and commercial building systems. There are currently no federal standards or test procedures for commercial and industrial pumps. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document regarding commercial and industrial pumps. 78 FR 7304 (February 1, 2013).

267

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide10 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide10 My Own Oral History Having done such a pre-internet literature review for my own PhD almost 40 years ago, let me offer a brief oral history. Royal Sabre Portable Typewriter 1973-1974 Note: Most PhD students need not do a full blown literature review. Typically, PhD students need only add recent literature to an already existing lit review. Note: I was not the typical student. My dissertation capitalized on my research project at the U.S. Naval Research Lab, where I was employed. None of my faculty had specialized in such topics. Thus: I had to do a full blown lit review from scratch. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply

268

Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Below are links to information about how to comment on DOE NEPA projects with open comment periods, including comment periods on the proposed scope of planned NEPA documents and on draft NEPA documents (e.g., draft environmental assessments and draft environmental impacts statements). The end of each comment period is indicated below. EIS-0496: San Luis Transmission Project, Alameda, Merced, San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, California Scoping: Comment Period Ends 01/21/14 DOE's Western Area Power Administration, with the Bureau of Reclamation as a cooperating agency, is preparing a joint EIS and environmental impact report (under the California Environmental Quality Act) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed interconnection of certain

269

News comments: exploring, modeling, and online prediction  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Online news agents provide commenting facilities for their readers to express their opinions or sentiments with regards to news stories. The number of user supplied comments on a news article may be indicative of its importance, interestingness, or impact. ...

Manos Tsagkias; Wouter Weerkamp; Maarten de Rijke

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

Department of Energy Considers Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Department of Energy Considers Comments on Buried Waste Cleanup The U.S. Department of Energy is evaluating the input it received from the public during the recent public comment period on a proposed plan to cleanup buried waste at DOE's Idaho Site. "The Agencies are evaluating the input we received from the public," said Mark Arenaz, (WAG 7 Federal Project Director). "We appreciate those people and organizations who took the time to study the proposed plan and give us input. We got some very good suggestions that we will consider carefully." A total of 227 formal comments were received by DOE regarding the Proposed Plan for the Radioactive Waste Management Complex Operable Unit 7-13/14. The Proposed Plan presented five (5) alternatives to address waste remediation in the Subsurface Disposal Area, ranging from

271

Electronic Comment Form | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Electronic Comment Form | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response...

272

FINAL-west-doe-rfi-comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October October 31, 2013 Mr. Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov Re: Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects, Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53436 (Aug. 29, 2013) Dear Mr. Lawrence: I. INTRODUCTION Western Energy Supply and Transmission Associates ("WEST") 1 respectfully submits these comments in response to the questions raised in the above-referenced Department of Energy (DOE) Request for Information (RFI). This RFI addresses the proposed pre-application process for siting of transmission projects requiring interagency

273

Hydrogen Codes and Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Codes and Standards Codes and Standards James Ohi National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Blvd. Golden, CO 80401 Background The development and promulgation of codes and standards are essential if hydrogen is to become a significant energy carrier and fuel because codes and standards are critical to establishing a market-receptive environment for commercializing hydrogen-based products and systems. The Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Program of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), with the help of the National Hydrogen Association (NHA) and other key stakeholders, are coordinating a collaborative national effort by government and industry to prepare, review, and promulgate hydrogen codes and standards needed to expedite hydrogen infrastructure development. The

274

Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U.S. Department  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U.S. of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U.S. Department of Energy's Request for Comment on Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency Testing (75 Fed. Reg. 52892 (August 30, 2010)) Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U.S. Department of Energy's Request for Comment on Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency Testing (75 Fed. Reg. 52892 (August 30, 2010)) The U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") has promulgated regulations that appear to subject essentially all vented gas fireplaces-including decorative gas fireplaces certified to the American National Standards Institute ("ANSI") Z21.50 standard-to heating efficiency standards, 75 Fed. Reg. 20112 (April 16, 2010). The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association ("HPBA") believes that this final rule was ill-considered

275

PARS II Standard Operating Procedure Business Rules  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 25, 2011 June 25, 2011 U.S. Department of Energy The PARS II Standard Operating Procedure is a "living document" and will be updated on an ongoing basis. Comments or suggestions are welcome and should be forwarded to the PARS II administrator at PARSIIsupportoecm@hq.doe.gov. Notes Comment Pages Comment Pages Index Screenshot Pages Introduction I-1 Generic Business Rules I-2 Select Project I-3 - I-5 Enter/Modify Project Information I-6 - I-15 Enter/Modify Contact Information I-16 - I-21 Creating a Project I-22 Enter CD0 Information I-23 - I-26 Enter CD1 Information I-27 - I-29 Enter CD2 Information I-30 - I-33 Enter CD3A Information I-34 - I-36 Enter CD3 Information I-37 - I-39 Enter CD4 Information I-40 - I-42 Enter Closeout Information I-43 - I-45 Enter BCP Information I-46 - I-50 Screenshot

276

WELDING STANDARDS  

SciTech Connect

Hanford Atomic Production Operation specification guides and standards for welding and brazing are presented. Details of this manual are given in TID- 4100 (Suppl.). (N.W.R.)

1963-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

277

The Standards Forum, September 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Black is the director of the Office of Nuclear and Facil- Black is the director of the Office of Nuclear and Facil- ity Safety Policy, in the Office of Environment, Safety and Health. He was formerly the director of the Office of Nuclear Safety Enforcement. Prior to joining the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in 1992, Mr. Black was a nuclear regulation con- sultant at TENERA L.P., an attorney at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and an attorney with the Internal Revenue Service. Recently, Mr. Black took time to respond to some questions from the Technical Stan- dards Program Office (TSPO) regarding the status of and "path forward" for the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP). His comments tell of the challenges facing the program and the entire DOE standards community. TSPO: How did you become involved in the Technical Standards Program?

278

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commercial Clothes Washers Energy Conservation Standard Commercial Clothes Washers Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering whether to revise its energy conservation standards for commercial clothes washers. This current rulemaking will satisfy the requirement to publish the second final rule by January 1, 2015 as mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates The DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document for commercial clothes washers. 77 FR 48108 (August 13, 2012). Public Meeting Information

279

The Standards Actions February 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Actions Technical Standards Program Document Status as of 1/31/96 In Preparation 5 7 Out for Comment 2 1 Total in process = 78 Published in Past 30 Days 0 In Conversion 2 3 Projects Initiated The following DOE technical standards projects were recently initiated. If you are interested in participating in the development of these standards, please contact the persons listed below. * Handbook for the Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation Program for Radiobioassay, Project No. SAFT-0049; Robert Loesch, EH-52; 301-903- 4443, Email, loesch@viper.eh.doe.gov. * Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors, Project No. 6910-0051; Ken L Maier, EH-31; 208-526- 9178, FAX 208-526-9650, Email, klm4@inel.gov. * Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of

280

Environment, Safety, and Health Assurance Program Standard: analysis in the context of Department of Energy environment, safety, and health requirements  

SciTech Connect

An Environment, Safety and Health (ES and H) Assurance Program Standard is presented. The Standard was published for comments in a previous document, and has been revised as a result of those comments. The benefits of using the Standard are described and, through the use of comparisons, it is demonstrated that the requirements of the applicable Department of Energy (DOE) Orders are satisfied by a program designed in accordance with the Standard.

Ellingson, A.C.; Trauth, C.A. Jr.

1979-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During its 1996 winter study JASON reviewed the DOE Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) program. This included the National Ignition Facility (NIF) and proposed studies. The result of the review was to comment on the role of the ICF program in support of the DOE Science Based Stockpile Stewardship program.

Hammer, D.; Dyson, F.; Fortson, N.; Novick, B.; Panofsky, W.; Rosenbluth, M.; Treiman, S.; York, H.

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

Summary of comments received from workshops on radiological criteria for decommissioning  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is conducting an enhanced participatory rulemaking to establish radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning of NRC-licensed facilities. Open public meetings were held during 1993 in Chicago, IL, San Francisco, CA, Boston, MA, Dallas, TX, Philadelphia, PA, Atlanta, GA, and Washington, DC. Interested parties were invited to provide input on the rulemaking issues before the NRC staff develops a draft proposed rule. This report summarizes 3,635 comments categorized from transcripts of the seven workshops and 1,677 comments from 100 NRC docketed letters from individuals and organizations. No analysis or response to the comments is included. The comments reflect a broad spectrum of viewpoints on the issues related to radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning. The NRC also held public meetings on the scope of the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) during July 1993. The GEIS meetings were held in Washington, DC., San Francisco, CA, Oklahoma City, OK, and Cleveland, OH. Related comments from these meetings were reviewed and comments which differed substantially from those from the workshops are also summarized in the body of the report. A summary of the comments from the GEIS scoping meetings is included as an Appendix.

Caplin, J.; Page, G.; Smith, D.; Wiblin, C. [Advanced Systems Technology, Inc., Atlanta, GA (United States)

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council and our more than 1.3 million members and online activists, we submit the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden. Comments_of_the_NRD Council_RRB_RFI_June2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Natural Resources Defense Council Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules

284

Adverbs of comment and disagreement  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Adverbs of comment (AOCs) such as sadly raise a question of subjective meaning, much like predicates of personal taste (fun, tasty), namely, to whom the speaker attributes the emotion or evaluation when there is no overt for-PP. I extend Lasersohn's ... Keywords: disagreement, incompleteness, judge, mis/incomphrehension, subjective meaning

Mingya Liu

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 15. 2011 April 15. 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Via Email: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Subject: Reducing Regulatory Burden, Request for Information, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 23, February 3, 2011 Dear Mr. Cohen: The American Gas Association (AGA) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the subject Department of Energy ("the Department") Request for Information (RFI) seeking comment and information to assist it in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether such regulations should be modified or repealed pursuant to Executive Order 13563 ("Improving

286

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide32 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-30 07:37 FY2010-open_gov Slide32 Federally Sponsored Research * December 2009: White House began seeking comments on improving public access to federally sponsored research. * Three-stage request for information closed at the end of January. * NIH model requires submission of electronic version of final peer-reviewed manuscript no later than 12 months after official date of publication. * While there has not yet been action from the White House, all indications are that the Administration will support free access to federally sponsored research. Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 3e13ee9b3e1 Your first name. Please enable Javascript to use this form.

287

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide11 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide11 Lit Review of 40 Years Ago Entailed: The use of massive volumes of a citation index. Looking up keywords related to the dissertation. Gathering citations to journal articles in the stacks at the University's library. Sitting at a desk perusing for hours the volumes of a citation index Writing down relevant citations. Walking through the library and pulling journals and finding articles. Examining hard copy and making notes by hand. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 89e5b37bc8 Your first name. Please enable Javascript to use this form. Subject: Comment: *

288

West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation June 29, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Bryan Bower 716-942-4368 Bill Taylor bill.taylor@srs.gov 803-952-8564 West Valley, NY - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today released to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the public and the states of Nevada and Texas, and the Seneca Nation of Indians for review and comment, a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the concentrator feed makeup tank and the melter feed hold tank (the vessels) at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP). This Draft Evaluation, which may enable the Department to dispose of the vessels as low-level radioactive waste (LLW), is a necessary step in the Department's cleanup efforts at

289

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes polices and procedures for carrying out the EPA's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

290

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes policies and procedures for carrying out the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

291

EOS standards  

SciTech Connect

An approach to creating accurate EOS for pressure standards is described. Applications to Cu, Au, and Ta are shown. Extension of the method to high compressions using DFT is illustrated. Comparisons with modern functionals show promise.

Greeff, Carl W [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2011-01-12T23:59:59.000Z

292

(Terminology standardization)  

SciTech Connect

Terminological requirements in information management was but one of the principal themes of the 2nd Congress on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering. The traveler represented the American Society for Testing and Materials' Committee on Terminology, of which he is the Chair. The traveler's invited workshop emphasized terminology standardization requirements in databases of material properties as well as practical terminology standardizing methods. The congress included six workshops in addition to approximately 82 lectures and papers from terminologists, artificial intelligence practitioners, and subject specialists from 18 countries. There were approximately 292 registrants from 33 countries who participated in the congress. The congress topics were broad. Examples were the increasing use of International Standards Organization (ISO) Standards in legislated systems such as the USSR Automated Data Bank of Standardized Terminology, the enhanced Physics Training Program based on terminology standardization in Physics in the Chinese province of Inner Mongolia, and the technical concept dictionary being developed at the Japan Electronic Dictionary Research Institute, which is considered to be the key to advanced artificial intelligence applications. The more usual roles of terminology work in the areas of machine translation. indexing protocols, knowledge theory, and data transfer in several subject specialties were also addressed, along with numerous special language terminology areas.

Strehlow, R.A.

1990-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

293

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fan Light Kits Energy Conservation Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is reviewing energy conservation...

294

20120131 DOE Congestion Study Clean Line Comments 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY 2012 NATIONAL ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION CONGESTION STUDY COMMENTS OF CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS LLC January 31, 2012 Clean Line Energy Partners LLC ("Clean Line") respectfully submits these comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Plan for Conduct of 2012 Electric Transmission Congestion Study ("Congestion Study") as published in the Federal Register on November 11, 2011. Clean Line appreciates the DOE's renewed efforts to gather and review existing and new transmission data across the nation (as per 76 FR 70122) to develop a list of congestion areas that may be eligible for backstop authority under 216a of the Federal Power

295

Standard Modeling  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standard no es suficiente Standard no es suficiente Avanzar Volver Principal ESTOY PERDIDO!!! Si bien el Modelo Standard proporciona una descripción muy buena de los fenómenos observados en los experimentos, todavía es una teoría incompleta. El problema es que el Modelo Standard no puede explicar la causa por la que existen algunas partículas, del modo en que lo hacen. Por ejemplo, aún cuando los físicos conocían las masas de todos los quarks, a excepción de la del quark top desde hace muchos años, no podían simplemente predecir en forma exacta la masa del top, sin utilizar evidencia experimental, dado que el Modelo Standard carece de un modelo matemático para calcular el patrón que siguen los valores de las masas de las partículas. Otra cuestión está relacionada con el hecho que existen tres pares de

296

The Standards Actions, May 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

this document is available on the Technical Standards Program this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. • Integrated Safety Management Systems Verification (ISMSV) Process, Team Leader’s Hand- book, Project Number SAFT- 0065; Jeffry Roberson, DP-45; 301-903-8026, jeffry.roberson @dp.doe.gov. DOE Documents Re- cently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: • DOE-HDBK-1113-97, Radiological Safety Training for Uranium Facilities, February 1998. DOE employees and DOE contractors may obtain copies from the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; telephone 423-576-8401 or FAX 423-576-5728. Subcontractors and the general public may obtain copies from the

297

Synchrophasor Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Development & Support Development & Support Kenneth Martin martin@electricpowergroup.com June 27-28, 2013 Washington, DC DOE/OE Transmission Reliability Program 2 Introduction  Synchrophasor measurement systems widely deployed  Enable a new generation of power system monitor & control capability - Improved power system analysis & system models - Wide area, high-resolution visibility - Basis for a new generation of controls  Research challenge - standards to enable interoperability - Measurement performance - Communications  Research focus - facilitate development, testing, and validation of standards to promote interoperability Basic phasor concept well known . A phasor is the complex form of the AC waveform √2 A cos (2 π ω 0 t + φ) A e

298

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

3194-55-6) used as a flame retardant in polystyrene building insulation, its possible substitutes, and alternative materials. The report was developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with input from a partnership of stakeholders from business, government, academia, and environmental organizations. According to technical experts on the Partnership, between 2011 and 2013 there were only two viable flame retardant alternatives to HBCD for use in expanded and extruded polystyrene foam (EPS and XPS) insulation under current manufacturing processes. Alternative materials are also available as substitutes to HBCDcontaining insulation. These alternatives may require additive flame retardants or other treatment to meet fire safety requirements. This report: 1) Identifies viable and non-viable flame retardant alternatives for HBCD in polystyrene building insulation foam; 2) Describes uses and provides an overview of end-of-life scenarios and exposure to HBCD; 3) Provides hazard profiles for HBCD and the two chemical alternatives; and 4) Provides an overview of relevant alternative materials. The hazard profile of the butadiene styrene brominated copolymer (CAS RN 1195978-93-8) shows that this chemical is anticipated to be safer than HBCD. Due to its large size, lack of low molecular weight (MW) components, and un-reactive functional groups, human health and ecotoxicity hazard for this copolymer are measured or predicted to be low. This alternative is inherently persistent. Its long-term behavior in the environment is not currently known. Chemical suppliers have commercialized this copolymer, and polystyrene manufacturers are testing the copolymer in their products to ensure that the polystyrene will meet all performance standards.

unknown authors

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures In response to an application, any person may file a protest, comments, or a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as applicable. Any person wishing to become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as applicable. Dockets Open for Public Comment A list of current dockets open for public comment can be found on the main Natural Gas Regulations page here. FILINGS: Filings may be submitted using one of the following methods. Please be sure to include Docket No. and Application Name with your filing: E-mail: fergas@hq.doe.gov (you must include FE Docket No. in the Subject line of the email) Regular Mail: (should include an original and three paper copies of

300

Standards Coordination Office Homepage  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Standards Coordination Office. ... About the Standards Coordination Office (SCO). The Standards Coordination Office of the ...

2013-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide12 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide12 Lit Review of 40 Years Ago Because the indexing was of necessity quite crude, most of the articles I reviewed turned out not to be relevant to my dissertation. But the only way I could find this out was to check out hundreds of articles personally: Find the right volume of a journal, and examine each article one at a time. For relevant articles, I had to copy the citation info by hand and also capture the meat of the article by hand. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: fa7603dfbfa7 Your first name. Please enable Javascript to use this form. Subject:

302

Safety Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US DOE Workshop US DOE Workshop September 19-20, 2012 International perspective on Fukushima accident Miroslav Lipár Head, Operational Safety Section M.Lipar@iaea.org +43 1 2600 22691 2 Content * The IAEA before Fukushima -Severe accidents management * The IAEA actions after Fukushima * The IAEA Action plan on nuclear safety * Measures to improve operational safety * Conclusions THE IAEA BEFORE FUKUSHIMA 4 IAEA Safety Standards IAEA Safety Standards F undamental S afety Principles Safety Fundamentals f o r p ro te c ti n g p e o p l e a n d t h e e n v i ro n m e n t IAEA Safety Standards Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material 2005 E dit ion Safety Requirements No. T S-R-1 f o r p ro te c ti n g p e o p l e a n d t h e e n v i ro n m e n t IAEA Safety Standards Design of the Reactor Core for Nuclear Power Plants

303

STANDARD REFERENCE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The profession is strongly urged to use the standard reference on the financial framework in the EU, concerning endorsed IFRS in order to give a clear message to the market and to users of financial statements in and outside the EU.

unknown authors

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

Transmission Congestion Study COMMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EDISION...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Preparation of the 2012 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study COMMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EDISION COMPANY OF NEW YORK. INC. AND ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC....

305

Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance and Enforcement Regulations for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment EO 13563 Preliminary Plan Microsoft Word - Lochinvar Comments -EO...

306

Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation...

307

Comment on "Quantum dense key distribution"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this Comment we question the security of recently proposed by Degiovanni et al. [Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 032310] scheme of quantum dense key distribution.

Antoni Wojcik

2004-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

308

Comments of the American Wind Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the American Wind Energy Association in response to the Department of Energy's solicitation for comments on the upcoming National Electric Transmission Congestion Study I. AWEA...

309

PARS II Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) PARS II Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) PARSIISOPVersion1.120110811.pdf More Documents & Publications External Independent Review (EIR)...

310

PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan...

311

PUBLIC COMMENT re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PUBLIC COMMENT re Price-Anderson Act PUBLIC COMMENT re Price-Anderson Act PUBLIC COMMENT (REPLY) by OHM Remediation Services Corp. in response to DOE's PREPARATION OF REPORT TO...

312

Comment re DOE's NOI re continuation or modification of Price...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re DOE's NOI re continuation or modification of Price-Anderson Act Comment re DOE's NOI re continuation or modification of Price-Anderson Act Comments of Kerr-McGee...

313

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Comments on Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act. TRW...

314

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act We have just been notified of the December 31, 1997, Federal Register Notice of opportunity for public comment on...

315

Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re Price-Anderson Act Comment re Price-Anderson Act Letter to DOE General Counsel from Marilyn Gayle Hoff re renewal of the Price-Anderson Act Comment re Price-Anderson Act...

316

Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment re Price-Anderson Act Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS - FAC-026-98 - States that Price-Anderson indemnification should be...

317

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Public Comment on Notice of Inquiry Concerning Preparation of Report to Congress on the Price Anderson...

318

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act In response the Federal Register notice of December 31, 1997 requesting public comments on the...

319

NCPA No. 2: IX comments and responses to Draft JES  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Comments received from twenty-six separate entities are included. Following each letter or set of comments are staff responses. Sections of the draft environmental statement which have been revised in response to these comments are noted. (PCS)

Not Available

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Public Comments to Community...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Summary of Comments for July 2012 through August 2013 Last saved on: 8302013 Annual Summary of CRP comment for July 2011- August 2012 1 SECTION COMMENT POST? 2.0 & 4.0 1....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Appliance Efficiency Standards (Massachusetts) | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

standards Implementing Agency MA Department of Energy Resources Review Biannual report Test Methods Massachusetts plumbing code or U.S. Department of Energy approved test methods...

322

National Green Building Standard Analysis  

SciTech Connect

DOE's Building America Program is a research and development program to improve the energy performance of new and existing homes. The ultimate goal of the Building America Program is to achieve examples of cost-effective, energy efficient solutions for all U.S. climate zones. Periodic maintenance of an ANSI standard by review of the entire document and action to revise or reaffirm it on a schedule not to exceed five years is required by ANSI. In compliance, a consensus group has once again been formed and the National Green Building Standard is currently being reviewed to comply with the periodic maintenance requirement of an ANSI standard.

NAHB Research Center, Upper Marlboro, Maryland

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Search for Standard Higgs Boson at Supercolliders N.V.Krasnikov and V.A.Matveev  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We review the standard Higgs boson physics and the search for standard Higgs boson at LEP and LHC supercolliders

unknown authors

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Portfolio Standard Portfolio Standard Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Program Info State New York Program Type Energy Efficiency Resource Standard In May 2007 the New York Public Service Commission (PSC) issued an order instituting a proceeding to develop an Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS). The order set a goal of reducing electricity usage in New York by 15% from projected electricity usage in 2015. After examining comments and input from staff and stakeholders, the PSC issued a further order in June 2008 establishing detailed program targets, ratepayer collections to fund energy efficiency programs, and various other protocols for the EEPS. The June 2008 order also established collections from natural gas customers to

325

Comment and response document for the final remedial action plan site design for stabilization of the Inactive Uranium Mill Tailings Sites at Slick Rock, Colorado  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document consists of comments and responses; the reviewers are the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Colorado Dept. of Public Health and Environment, and the remedial action contractor (RAC).

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

Energy Standard  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Bingaman Bingaman November 2011 Analysis of Impacts of a Clean www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Bingaman i Contacts This report, Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard, as requested by Chairman Bingaman, was prepared

327

Energy Standard  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Hall Hall October 2011 Analysis of Impacts of a Clean www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Hall i Contacts This report, Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Hall, was prepared under the

328

Standard Elements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Table 1   ASTM standards applicable to element-level testing of composites...Composite Plates Subjected to a Distributed Load Plate flexure D 6484 Open-Hole Compression Strength of Polymer Matrix Composites Open-hole compression strength Z 5370Z Compression After Impact Strength of Fiber-Resin Composites Compression after impact Z 7225Z Mixed Mode I-Mode II...

329

A Comparison of Cross-Sector Cyber Security Standards  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents a review and comparison (commonality and differences) of three cross-sector cyber security standards and an internationally recognized information technology standard. The comparison identifies the security areas covered by each standard and reveals where the standards differ in emphasis. By identifying differences in the standards, the user can evaluate which standard best meets their needs. For this report, only cross-sector standards were reviewed.

Robert P. Evans

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Department of Energy Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors Department of Energy Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period on National...

331

Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC | Department...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by...

332

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013...

333

EA-1566: Notice of Comment Period Extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1566: Notice of Comment Period Extension Proposed Infrastructure Improvements for the Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada DOE is extending the public comment period for the Yucca...

334

DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium Program Environmental...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium Program Environmental Impact Statement DOE Extends Public Comment Period for Uranium...

335

Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and Complaint Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and...

336

Energy Department Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of Energy Policy Act of 2005 Energy Department Seeks Public Comment on Standby Support Provisions of Energy Policy Act of 2005 November...

337

Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments...

338

Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on Convention on...

339

Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent Cost Allocation Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent Cost Allocation DOE published a...

340

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by International Group on Nuclear Liability (CIGNL), in response...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOESEA-04 Potomac River Generating Station Mirant Reply to Comments re Special Environmental Analysis, DOESEA-04 Potomac...

342

Reply Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates NIST Green Button Presentation AARP Reply Comments to Department of Energy Implementing the...

343

Comments of the American Public Gas Association on the Smart...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of the American Public Gas Association on the Smart Grid RFI Comments from The American Public Gas Association on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing policy and logisitcal...

344

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the Association of American Railroads in response to DOE's invitation to comment on Price-Anderson indemnification (62 Fed. Reg. 68272 (Dec. 31, 1997). Public comment re...

345

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reply comments to notice of inquiry concerning preparation of report to Congress on the Price-Anderson Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act More Documents & Publications...

346

Public comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Price Anderson Act Concerning The Continuation Or Modification Of The Act Public comment re Price-Anderson Act More Documents & Publications PUBLIC COMMENT re Price-Anderson Act...

347

COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING SMART GRID POLICY COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF TO REQUEST...

348

Comments by the American Electric Power System on Proposed Coordinatio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments by the American Electric Power System on Proposed Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities Comments by the American Electric Power...

349

EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice to Extend Public Comment Period EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States The Department of Energy and the Bureau...

350

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM...

351

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and...

352

US Department of Energy Public Participation Policy Comment Response Document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Niney-nine respondents provided comments to DOE on its ``Draft Public Involvement Policy`` (Dec. 1, 1993). Their comments and DOE`s responses are listed.

Not Available

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

353

Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad Comments on ORNL Tech transfer.txt - Notepad More Documents & Publications TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER...

354

Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying...

355

Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Energy's Request for Comment on Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency Testing (75 Fed. Reg. 52892 (August 30, 2010)) Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association...

356

Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric onImplementing the National Broadband Plan by...

357

Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the...

358

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light...

359

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota Comments of Lake Region Electric...

360

Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments Electricity Advisory Committee Technology Development Transmission...

362

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide15 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide15 Lit Review of Today Third, you can call up the article's...

363

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Slide13 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide13 Lit Review of 40 Years Ago Then I had to scour the list of...

364

The Standards Forum, March 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, Number 4 - March 2001 8, Number 4 - March 2001 The Standards News on the DOE Technical Standards Program Volume 8 - Number 4 - March 2001 DOE-TSL-1 The Department of Energy (DOE) Standards Index (DOE-TSL-1) has served to identify technical standards (both Government and non-Government) and standard- ization documents used by DOE and its contractors. Each year, the Technical Standards Program Office (TSPO) uses the DOE "Explorer" system to identify new/revised DOE directives that identify (a) non-Gov- ernment standards adopted for use by reference in the directive(s), and (b) documents prepared by other Federal agencies that DOE and its contractors use as technical stan- dards (in both instances, the review focuses on non-Government stan- dards and Federal documents not previously identified and recorded by

365

EA-1774: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

774: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards 774: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment EA-1774: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the adoption of amended energy conservation standards as required by The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended) for direct heating equipment, as contained in the final rule titled, "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating quipment," would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the NEPA. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 22, 2010

366

Open Standards, Open Formats, and Open Source  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The paper proposes some comments and reflections on the notion of openness and on how it relates to three important topics: open standards, open formats, and open source. Often, these terms are considered equivalent and/or mutually implicated: open source is the only way to enforce and exploit open standards. This position is misleading, as it increases the confusion about this complex and extremely critical topic. The paper clarifies the basic terms and concepts. This is instrumental to suggest a number of actions and practices aiming at promoting and defending openness in modern ICT products and services.

Davide Cerri; Alfonso Fuggetta; Davide Cerri; Alfonso Fuggetta; Cefriel Politecnico Di Milano

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing section 216(h): Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing section 216(h): Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands Section 1221(a) of EPAct 2005, which added section 216(h) to the Federal Power Act, stated that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is to coordinate all Federal authorizations and related environmental reviews needed for siting interstate electric transmission projects, including National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) reviews. The purpose of this coordination is to streamline agencies' review processes and avoid duplication among Federal agencies. Section 216(h) of the Federal Power Act

368

Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Volume 2: Comment and Response Document: Chapter 2: Comment Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Portsmouth DUF Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS 2 COMMENT DOCUMENTS This section provides copies of the actual letters or other documents containing public comments on the draft EISs that were submitted to DOE, including comments extracted from the transcripts of the public hearings. Table 2.1 contains an index of the comment documents by document number. Table 2.2 provides an index of comment documents by the commentors last name. Table 2.3 contains an index of comment documents by company or organization. Individual comments are denoted with vertical lines in the right margin. TABLE 2.1 Index of Commentors by Document Number Document Number Name Company/Organization Page D0001 Driver, Charles M. Individual 2-5 D0002 Kilrod, John Individual 2-7 D0003 Colley, Vina Portsmouth/Piketon Residents for Environmental Safety and Security

369

December 2007 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Standards Forum & Standards Actions Page 1 December 2007 The Standards Forum & Standards Actions Page 1 December 2007 Continued on next page Technical Standards Program Manager's Note 1 Teaching Standards Development- Inspiring the Next Generation 2 The EPA Radiation Standard for Spent-Fuel Storage in a Geological Repository 3 Expanded Access to Hydrogen Codes and Standards 4 Really Following the Building Code 6 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 7

370

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

populations. It also provides recommendations for consideration by state agencies related to extreme heatDRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXTREME HEAT ADAPTATION INTERIM GUIDANCE DOCUMENT (CAT) 8/31/2012 #12;DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Page 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXTREME HEAT ADAPTATION

371

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide03 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 06:57 FY2008-interlab Slide03 The Science.gov Alliance 17 organizations from 13 agencies * Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Library United States Forest Service * Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology National Technical Information Service * Department of Defense Defense Technical Information Center * Department of Education National Library of Education * Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information * Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine * Department of Interior United States Geological Survey National Biological Information Infrastructure * Environmental Protection Agency

372

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide05 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 14:11 FY2009-jordan Slide05 Science.gov Databases Agriculture & Food * AGRICOLA * Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) Technology Transfer Automated Retrieval System (TEKTRAN) Applied Science & Technologies * DefenseLINK Website * DOT National Transportation Library Integrated Search * DTIC S & T Database * National Institute of Standards and Technology Data Gateway * U.S. Patent & Trademark Office Database Astronomy & Space * NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) * SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) Biology & Nature * NBII National Biological Information Infrastructure Earth & Ocean Sciences * NOAA Photo Library * USGS Publications Warehouse Energy &

373

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Liquid-Immersed and Medium-Voltage Dry-type Distribution Transformers Energy Conservation Standard Liquid-Immersed and Medium-Voltage Dry-type Distribution Transformers Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) has completed a rulemaking to amend the current energy conservation standards for liquid-immersed, medium voltage dry-type, and low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers. This activity is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a final rule regarding amended energy efficiency standards for liquid-immersed, medium-voltage dry-type, and low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers. 78 FR 23335 (April 18, 2013). The distribution transformers final rule was the DOE's first "negotiated rulemaking," conducted under the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act.

374

May 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2

375

Memorandum, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Memorandum, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments Memorandum, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments The purpose of this memorandum is to distribute for interim use and comment a new draft Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments. This Standard provides guidance and criteria for a standard approach to utilization of probabilistic risk assessments in nuclear safety applications. This interim Standard was developed by a team of experts from the DOE Program Secretarial Offices and private industry. DOE_Standard_Probabilistic_Risk_Assessments.pdf More Documents & Publications Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use

376

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

B-1 B-1 APPENDIX B RELATED INTERNET WEB SITES WHERE CAN I ACCESS ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REFERENCES LISTED IN THIS REFERENCE BOOK? http://www.cfo.doe.gov/policy/actindex/index.html-ssi DOE Accounting Handbook http://www.pr.doe.gov/acqguide.html DOE Acquisition Guide http://www.pr.doe.gov//acqltr.html DOE Acquisition Letters http://www.pr.doe.gov/dear.html DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) http://www.cfo.doe.gov/progliaison/bmop/index.htm DOE Business Management Oversight Process Web Page http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/ DOE Chief Financial Officer Budget Related Information (DOE Budget Call, Budget Formulation Handbook, Principles of Appropriation Law, etc.) http://home.doe.gov/news/releases99/junpr/pr99163.htm DOE Deputy Secretary's Memorandum, of June 25, 1999, on Project Management

377

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and services are transported cost effectively and in a manner which protects property, individuals and the environment. This chapter details the roles and responsibilities of the members of the contract administration team in the transportation, personal property and real property management areas. It also provides

378

Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of of North Dakota Public Service Commissioner Susan Wefald U.S. Department of Energy Transmission Congestion Study Workshop June 18, 2008 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma I am very pleased to have this chance to share thoughts with the U.S. Department of Energy at this Transmission Congestion Study Workshop. I would like to thank the Department for arranging this meeting to provide input on the 2009 study on Electric Transmission Congestion. In this talk, my thoughts represent those of the North Dakota Public Service Commission. As requested, I will be discussing changes in the North Dakota area since 2005 that affect the location, duration, frequency, magnitude, and significance of transmission congestion, including related constraints. In 2005 North Dakota had an export limit around its south and east borders (commonly referred to as NDEX) of about 1,950 MW, which if exceeded can cause

379

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

property for which they are responsible (both real and personal) and must be able to forecast future needs of the activities that they support. The real and personal property of...

380

EA-1892: Direct Final Rule Energy Conservation Standards for Residential  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

92: Direct Final Rule Energy Conservation Standards for 92: Direct Final Rule Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnaces and Residential Central Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps EA-1892: Direct Final Rule Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnaces and Residential Central Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to adopt energy conservation standards for various consumer products and certain commercial and industrial equipment, including residential furnaces and residential air conditioners and heat pumps, as required by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6291 et seq.). Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download June 27, 2011 EA-1892: Draft Environmental Assessment

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Energy Department Announces January 2006 Deadline for Appliance Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 2006 Deadline for Appliance January 2006 Deadline for Appliance Standards Rulemaking Schedules Energy Department Announces January 2006 Deadline for Appliance Standards Rulemaking Schedules November 15, 2005 - 2:47pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced it will present schedules for all appliance rulemaking activities no later than January 31, 2006. The schedules will be developed following a public meeting held today to invite comment on standards scheduling issues. DOE will finalize its standards scheduling plan after consideration of comments received during and following the public meeting. "The Department of Energy's aggressive commitment to present schedules by January 31, 2006, is driven by our desire to speed up the process and

382

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide09 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-23 07:04 FY2012-OSTI_publishers Slide09 FundRef Project CrossRef Adds 2 New Metadata Elements *OSTI has worked with CENDI (the Federal Scientific and Technical Information Managers Group) members to have a standard list of agencies so there will be no ambiguity for agency names. *The current status of the project is that publishers will work with authors to populate the two new metadata elements. *CrossRef has agreed to add two metadata elements to the CrossRef database which would apply to each journal article. The two metadata elements would capture: *Funding Agency *Grant Number *Estimated completion - 1 year Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field)

383

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide15 Submitted by gibsone on Wed, 2013-08-21 11:19 FY2007-etdeportugal Slide15 ETDE Model - Multilateral Cooperation: * Efficient * Comprehensive * Original "One Stop" Concept The ETDE model, launched 20 years ago, was a single replacement for numerous bilateral exchanges and allowed many countries to submit their energy research and technology information into a common database and then gain access to all other member countries' information. One stream of input, one set of input standards, one output product. Compared to the previous model, this arrangement would properly be characterized as efficient, comprehensive, and an original "one-stop" searching concept. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64

384

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide14 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 12:07 FY2008-stip speeches FY2008-stip Slide14 OSTI on the Right Track Leveraging technology (e.g. federated search) vs. invoking prescribed standards FY 2007 Report to Congress on Implementation of The E-Government Act of 2002 (Science.gov again recognized) "Science.gov provides search capability across 30 Federal agency R&D databases and provides links to science websites and scientific databases so citizens can access the results of Federal research. In FY 2007 Science.gov experienced 6.5 million search queries across all its scientific databases and 2.6 million page views of its website." Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field)

385

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide12 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-23 06:43 FY2013-APE speeches FY2013-APE Slide12 The FundRef Pilot Goal: To standardize funding information within the body of regular metadata collected by scholarly publications for submission to CrossRef. Publishers Funders American Institute of Physics (AIP) US Department of Energy American Psychological Association (APA) US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Elsevier Science US National Science Foundation IEEE Wellcome Trust Nature Publishing Group Oxford University Press Wiley Specific Task: Add 'agency name' metatag and contract/grant number to CrossRef metadata. Final report/recommendations expected March 2013 Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field)

386

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide18 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 13:29 FY2011-Jordan Slide18 Development Milestones * Version 5.0 (Sept 2008) * Clustering of results by subtopics or dates to help target your search * Wikipedia results related to your search terms * EurekaAlert News results related to your search terms * Mark-and-send option to email results to friends and colleagues * More science sources for a more thorough search * Enhanced information related to your real-time search * New look and feel * Updated Alerts Service * Standardized citation formats available for download * Version 5.1 Aggregated news feeds from 11 science agencies * Internships and Fellowships section made searchable * Image Search Library (Coming soon!) Add new comment Original Thumbnail

387

Building Technologies Office: About Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standards Standards Learn more about: History of Federal Appliance Standards How to Get Involved We rely on our appliances every day to cook and refrigerate our food, clean our clothes, heat our water, and perform many other daily tasks. But most of us take our appliances and the energy and water they use for granted. The operating cost of an appliance over its lifetime may be several times greater than its initial purchase price. Many consumers do not consider energy or water efficiency when making their purchases. But looking for an energy efficient model can save you money over the long run. Congress passed laws setting initial federal energy efficiency standards and establishing schedules for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to review and revise these standards. Standards benefit consumers by requiring that appliance manufacturers reduce the energy and water use of their products-and thus the costs to operate them.

388

Catalog of Standards  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Catalog of Standards. ... As of May 2013, the number of standards or standards components added to the Catalog of Standards stands at 56. ...

2013-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

389

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dishwashers, Dehumidifiers, and Conventional Cooking Products Standby Mode and Off Mode Test Procedure Dishwashers, Dehumidifiers, and Conventional Cooking Products Standby Mode and Off Mode Test Procedure Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its test procedures for residential dishwashers, dehumidifiers, and conventional cooking products (kitchen ranges and ovens) to provide for measurement of standby mode and off mode energy use by these products. This activity is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). This Rulemaking is related to the Residential Dishwashers and Residential Dehumidifiers Standard and Test Procedure. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information

390

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

High Intensity Discharge Lamps Test Procedures High Intensity Discharge Lamps Test Procedures Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products High-intensity discharge (HID) lamps include mercury vapor (MV), metal halide (MH), and high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps. The Department of Energy (DOE) is establishing test procedures for HID lamps. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). ( 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309) This Rulemaking is related to the High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Standard and Test Procedure. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding test procedures for HID lamps. 76 FR 77914 (Dec. 15, 2011).

391

Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews Draft for Public Review and Comment March 2013 2 Table of Contents: I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Questions and Answers .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Stage 1: Preliminary Questions ................................................................................................. 5 1. How Does NEPA and CEQA Terminology Differ? .................................................... 5 a. "Action" (NEPA) versus "Project" (CEQA) ................................................ 5

392

Cold vacuum drying facility 90% design review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document contains review comment records for the CVDF 90% design review. Spent fuels retrieved from the K Basins will be dried at the CVDF. It has also been recommended that the Multi-Conister Overpacks be welded, inspected, and repaired at the CVD Facility before transport to dry storage.

O`Neill, C.T.

1997-05-02T23:59:59.000Z

393

Public Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012 Public Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012 The Department issued a Federal Register Notice initiating preparations for development of the 2012 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. DOE requested comments on what publicly-available data and information should be considered, and what types of analysis should be performed to identify and understand the significance and character of transmission congestion. The following public comments were received as of March 30, 2012, in response to the 2012 study. DOE appreciates the comments that various individuals and organizations submitted. Comments were received from these organizations, listed alphabetically.

394

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide16 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 13:34 FY2009-lowg Slide16 WorldWideScience.org * Includes databases/sources from some countries/regions not traditionally well-covered * Has shown tremendous growth from 10 databases and portals from 12 countries to NOW over 40 databases and portals from more than 50 countries. * Includes clustering feature, which groups search results into similar topics, as well as specific date ranges * Machine translation tools to facilitate the addition of non-English sources are under review * Press release is planned this week, China to become latest member Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 9f6cf2ac689f6c Your first name.

395

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide07 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 12:51 FY2011-warnick-STIP2011 Slide07 America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 Research results Dissemination Long-term stewardship Digital data Scholarly publications SEC. 103. INTERAGENCY PUBLIC ACCESS COMMITTEE. (a) ESTABLISHMENT.-The Director shall establish a working group under the National Science and Technology Council with the responsibility to coordinate Federal science agency research and policies related to the dissemination and long-term stewardship of the results of unclassified research, including digital data and peer-reviewed scholarly publications, supported wholly, or in part, by funding from the Federal science agencies. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64

396

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide29 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 13:35 FY2009-lowg Slide29 Legislative Update the debate continues * Currently, the NIH Public Access Policy ensures public has access to published results of NIH-funded research * Requires scientists to submit final peer-reviewed journal manuscripts to PubMed Central * Potential for this Policy to extend to other Federal Agencies (open access potential and $$ savings) * If required, DOE has infrastructure in place to implement through the Scientific and Technical Information Program (STIP) * This Policy is under attack; proposed legislation is the Fair Copyright in Research Works Act - Would overturn the NIH policy and make it illegal for other U.S Federal agencies to enact similar policies Add new comment

397

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide06 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 13:22 quicktabs-title FY2006-stip-jordan Slide06 Science Research Connection: One Year Old In a single search, you (DOE and DOE contractors) can access public STI found in IB or ECD as well as access-limited STI Introduced many new features! Currently contains > 6 million bibliographic citations and > 175,000 full-text documents. DOE/DOE contractor requests: Over 1,000 FT documents requested Over half have been scanned and made available Currently 260 requests in process (e.g., review, scanning) Approx 260 document requests could not be "honored" because FT not available (journal articles, copyrighted books or conferences) Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply

398

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide20 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-30 06:35 FY2011-Anderson Slide20 Digitization of DOE Report Collections * With the current NE cost recovery efforts going on, OSTI will digitize in the neighborhood of 7,500-10,000 documents annually. * Strategic Repository Management - Unclassified Vault: 900,000 hardcopy documents and 400,000 microfiche - Document Digitization: Mix of in-house efforts and partnerships (DOE sites, INIS, private sector). Advanced scanning technology implementation. Documents are reviewed for sensitivity. - Seeking funds to digitize the complete legacy collection. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 39799d8397 Your first name.

399

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide28 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide28 DOE Plan for Public Access OSTI believes FundRef is a great way for publishers and funding agencies to work together. Research agencies like DOE are accountable for the results of their expenditures to Congress and to the public. Publications in the peer-reviewed literature represent an important output of those expenses, but they have been difficult to track and quantify until now. Public access will expose DOE journal literature to the public Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: f87397cd84f Your first name. Please enable Javascript to use this form.

400

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide24 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-30 07:18 FY2010-cendi-warnick Slide24 ScienceEducation.gov Supporting Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education for America * Begun as a DOE initiative, OSTI partnered with sister organization, the Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) * Broadened project to include other agencies Beta Version opened December 2009 * Provides novel single-query search of STEM education materials from six agencies. * Development of grade stratification by an SBIR awardee is being assessed as one component * Open platform used, inviting participation by teachers to comment, review, and tag resources * Modeled after Science.gov in terms of operation, governance, and search

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide13 Submitted by gibsone on Wed, 2013-08-21 11:28 FY2007-etdesouthafrica Slide13 Search Results Shown are a series of search results from several different terms. First there are results from searching on "hydrogen" and "fuel cells," meaning we want to see all these terms appearing in a record. And, you can see we got 9,862 matches. In any of these cases, where I'm showing thousands of matches, it's mainly to illustrate the breadth and volume of the database. Obviously, you would probably want to refine or narrow your search to something more manageable to review what may be relevant to you. Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: e730004e7

402

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide14 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 14:11 FY2009-jordan Slide14 Content Management Is Distributed * NTIS developed the original "catalog" with input from agencies * CENDI Secretariat now maintains catalog with agency participation * Agency content managers submit and edit their information via a web form * Websites identified in the catalog are indexed nightly by USGS * Deep web databases are identified by agencies and reviewed by team for suitability * Real-time search of content in large databases is maintained by OSTI, which hosts the website and serves as operations manager Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 32d2c7d63832d Your first name.

403

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide14 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 13:29 FY2011-Jordan Slide14 Content Management Is Distributed * NTIS developed the original "catalog" with input from agencies * CENDI Secretariat now maintains catalog with agency participation * Agency content managers submit and edit their information via a web form * Websites identified in the catalog were indexed by USGS; now done by OSTI * Deep web databases are identified by agencies and reviewed by team for suitability * Real-time search of content in large databases is maintained by OSTI, which continues to host the website and serve as operations manager Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 7c897bdd7

404

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide20 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 12:51 FY2011-warnick-STIP2011 Slide20 OSTI & Journals: Building Relationships Articles Cited by DOE Labs * OSTI receives some citation information from DOE labs for DOE-sponsored research published in peer-reviewed journals Potential to Collaborate with Publishers * Number of citations for a specific publisher to be analyzed * For example: For Wiley journals, since 2002, approx. 1000 citations reported to OSTI for research published in 165 Wiley journals. * DOIs were obtained from CrossRef for only 50% of the Wiley citations - an area for improvement. * Wiley-OSTI pilot project recently initiated. * Addition of "Funding Agency" as a metadata field is a start. Add new comment Original

405

Microsoft Word - IIP_comments_9.26.2013_final.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PO Box 1253 | Bozeman, MT 59771 PO Box 1253 | Bozeman, MT 59771 Page 1 of 7 September 26, 2013 Julie A. Smith and Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW. Washington, DC 20585 Via e-mail: juliea.smith@hq.doe.gov and christopher.lawrence@hq.doe.gov RE: Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Comments on a Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process Dear Ms. Smith and Mr. Lawrence: On behalf of Jefferson County, Montana, the Western Environmental Law Center, Future West, and the Sonoran Institute, please accept these comments on the draft Integrated, Interagency Pre- Application (IIP) Process. Our entities are uniquely qualified to submit these comments because of our hands-on experience

406

Public Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for Transmission (April 2012) Public Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for Transmission (April 2012) On February 27, 2012, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice seeking information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve multiple Federal, State, local and Tribal authorizations and are subject to a wide array of processes and procedural requirements in order to obtain all necessary permits and other authorizations. Delays in securing required statutory reviews, permits, and consultations can threaten the completion projects of

407

Standards Actions - February 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initiated Initiated The following DOE Technical Standards projects were recently initiated. If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of these stan- dards, please contact the persons listed below. Complete listings of all DOE Technical Stan- dards projects and their status are given in the Web Site referenced at the bottom of this page. To access these lists from the home page, click on “DOE Technical Standards,” then click on “Projects” in the left-hand frame to show the links to the project lists. • Preparation Guide for U.S. Department of Energy Non-Reactor Nuclear Facility Safety Analysis Reports, Project Number SAFT-0075 (5-year review/update of DOE-STD-3009-94); Richard W. Englehart, EH-31, 301-903-3718, Fax 301-903-1182, Richard.Englehart@hq.doe.gov. This

408

Energy Efficiency Resource Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Efficiency Resource Standard Efficiency Resource Standard Energy Efficiency Resource Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Utility Program Info State Rhode Island Program Type Energy Efficiency Resource Standard Provider Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission Rhode Island enacted legislation in 2006 requiring the state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to establish standards for system reliability, energy efficiency and conservation procurement, including standards for energy supply diversification, distributed generation, demand response, and "prudent and reliable" energy efficiency and energy conservation measures. These standards and guidelines, which were adopted by the PUC in 2008, must be reviewed at least once every three years. Each electric and natural gas

409

COMMENTS OF TENDRIL NETWORKS, INC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy July 12, 2010 Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy in response to the Request for Information "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." We agree with the observation presented in this RFI that access and privacy are complementary goods. We believe that the success of the smart grid will be measured by the degree to which consumers are engaged. In order to become engaged, consumers must have access to the information about real-time conditions, historical usage and underlying prices of energy markets.

410

Toshiba RFI Comments.xlsx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Definition and Scope Definition and Scope Answer/Comment 1 What significant policy challenges are likely to remain unaddressed if we employ Title XIII's definition? The following points are not referencedd in EISA 1301. ・Power provider should also control the output fluctuation of renewable resources. ・The end user should have the choice of which form of power storage to be used. Certain types of energy conservation and storage could work better in different applications (e.g. not only electricity power but also stored thermal energy which is more efficient for some purpose.) 2 If the definition is overly broad, what policy risks emerge as a result? In that case, the budget will be much greater in scale. Certain smart grid investments may not be as cost effective and could get lost in the overall

411

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating Procedures INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating...

412

Diagnostic Medical Sonography Clinical Technical Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Diagnostic Medical Sonography Clinical Technical Standards Listed below are the technical standards identified for students in the Diagnostic Medical Sonography (DMS) clinical program. Review each standard and communicate effectively. Smell Be able to detect electrical hazards inherent in medical equipment Speech

Barrash, Warren

413

Federal Information Processing Standards  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Federal Information Processing Standards Publications (FIPS PUBS). ... Replacement Standards for Withdrawn FIPS on Geographic Codes.

2013-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

414

March 2007 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2007 March 2007 Continued on next page TSP Manager's Notes 1 Domestic Programs (American National Standards) Overview 2 Aerospace Industry Advocates Standards Selection Based on Technical Merit, Not Semantics 3 Report Recommends Withdrawal of OMB Risk Assessment Bulletin 4 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 5 Topical Committee Developments 6 Welcome Aboard the TSMC! 7 Standards Actions 8 DOE Standards Actions 8

415

Notices III. Summary of Public Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 Federal Register 32 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2012 / Notices III. Summary of Public Comments Received and Agency Response to Comments During the public comment period provided, EPA received no comments in response to the September 26, 2012 Federal Register notice announcing the Agency's receipt of the requests for voluntary cancellation and termination of all uses of products listed in Table 1 of Unit II. IV. Cancellation Order Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f), EPA hereby approves the requested cancellation and termination of all uses of halofenozide registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II. Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders that the product registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II. are canceled and all uses of halofenozide are terminated. The

416

Microsoft Word - UTC Comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of ADDRESSING POLICY AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES TO SMART GRID IMPLEMENTATION ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UTILITIES TELECOM COUNCIL The Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC") is pleased to provide the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. 1 While the RFI raises many important issues for the future development of the Smart Grid, UTC devotes its comments to one issue which Federal policy makers can play a uniquely important role: access to spectrum. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI regarding the communication needs

417

Microsoft Word - vol3-comments.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

i i VOLUME 3 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODOLOGY 1 3. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COMMENTERS 2 4. COMMENTS AND DOE RESPONSES 6 This page intentionally left blank. 1 1. INTRODUCTION The Draft EIS for the Kemper County IGCC Project was published in November 2009. DOE distributed copies of the Draft EIS to officials, agencies, Native American tribes, organizations, libraries, and members of the public identified in the distribution list (Chapter 12 of Draft EIS, Volume 1). DOE announced the notice of avail- ability of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57297); and EPA published the notice of availability in the Federal Register on November 6, 2009 (74 FR 57466). This Volume 3 provides a

418

AES Round 2 Official Public Comments  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... nist.gov> Subject: Comments on MARS Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 13:53:39 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72 ...

2007-09-25T23:59:59.000Z

419

Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Alerts Comments  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Alerts Comments If you have a question about Energy Citations Database Alerts, we recommend you check frequently asked questions. If your question still has not been answered or if...

420

NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Department of Energys efforts to make its regulatory program more effective and...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA RE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA RE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA RE PRICE-ANDERSON ACT COMMENT BY ESMERALDA COUNTY, NEVADA CONCERNING THE CONTINUATION...

422

DOE standard: Radiological control  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is disseminated by the federal government. We published a proposed Bulletin on September 15, 2003. Based on public comments, we published a revised proposal for additional comment on April 28, 2004. We are now finalizing the April version, with minor revisions responsive to the public's comments. The purpose of the Bulletin is to enhance the quality and credibility of the government's scientific information. We recognize that different types of peer review are appropriate for different types of information. Under this Bulletin, agencies are granted broad

424

EIS-0403: Public Comment Period Extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

403: Public Comment Period Extension 403: Public Comment Period Extension EIS-0403: Public Comment Period Extension Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced a two-week extension of the public comment period for the Draft Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Solar PEIS), a joint effort with the Department of Energy. The agencies had previously provided for a 120-day public comment period on the Draft Solar PEIS. Because of numerous requests, the agencies extended the comment period by an additional two weeks beyond April 16, 2011. The comment period ran (with extension) until May 2, 2011. EIS-0403-DEIS_Second_Comment_Extension-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period

425

Consensus Review  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... In writing process OFI comments, have you convinced the applicant that it should invest in a new process and why that investment is important? ...

2013-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

426

SPEAR3 Mini-Lehman Review Committee Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

are in production. The first machined QEC chambers have arrived and production welding will begin in March. The RF cavities are on track for FY2001 delivery. The 1.2 MW...

427

NEHRP - 2006 Public Review and Comment on the 2001 ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... consider broad interdependent networks in reformulating strategic plan. ... Build into new plan some aspect ... What involvement does NEHRP have in ...

428

Standards and Test Procedures | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards and Test Procedures Standards and Test Procedures Standards and Test Procedures The Department of Energy (DOE) establishes energy efficiency standards for certain appliances and equipment, and currently covers more than 50 different products. Authority to undertake this effort was granted by Congress, and DOE follows a four phase process when reviewing existing and developing new standards. Each Product page provides information on recent updates, current standards and test procedures, waivers, exceptions, and exemptions, statutory authority, and historical information. For information on current Rulemakings, visit Current Rulemaking and Notices. Consumer Products Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies Ceiling Fans Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Clothes Dryers

429

May 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Actions 1 Standards Actions 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2

430

Readiness Review RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Readiness Review Module Readiness Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R Readin Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan ness Rev view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) view e pplicability D-3 EMENT CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-

431

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide13 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-23 06:43 FY2013-APE speeches FY2013-APE Slide13 The FundRef Workflow FundRef Registry provides standard funder names to publisher manuscript tracking systems. Publishers ask authors to select correct funders and provide grant numbers upon manuscript submission. Funder information transferred to publisher production systems. Publishers send collected funder information in their CrossRef deposits. Funders and other stakeholders query FundRef API: Given funder & grant numbers, return DOIs of publication funded Given DOI, return funder identifiers and grant numbers associated with DOI Funding information displayed on publisher PDFs and websites using standard CrossMark UI. Governance to be determined: Funder Registry*

432

Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. ("Entergy"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, regarding the current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities. Entergy commented on similar issues in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") during the FCC's development of the National Broadband Plan. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc.

433

RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and American Public Power Association file these brief reply comments in support of the comments and reply comments filed by the Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC"). Both organizations strongly believe that the Administration should ensure that adequate spectrum is available for internal, utility networks. Integrating Smart Grid technologies into Cooperative and Public Power Systems will necessitate enhanced communications networks. In some instances, Cooperatives and Public Power Systems may choose a commercial provider for at least some portion of their communication network service

434

Appliance Energy Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Stove, washer, dryer, refrigerator, Energy Star Label Appliance Energy Standards Energy Efficiency Standard The Energy Efficiency Standards Group analyzes technical, economic, and...

435

ISO Standards Documents  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

ISO/TC 34: Food products and TC 34/SC 17: Management systems for food safety ISO Standards Documents iso3rss ISO Standards Development ISO Standards Development

436

JOSEPH MULLINIX, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT- BUSINESS AND FINANCE Re Green Building Design and Clean Energy Standards Policy and Procedures  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

As you know, the Academic Council held a preliminary discussion in January of the documents relating to the draft Policy on Green Building Design and Clean Energy Standards, and considered whether and how faculty should be involved in development and implementation of this policy. As I indicated in my follow-up letter of January 23, Council agreed that faculty input would be advisable in regard both to finalizing the guidelines and to implementation. It was also recommended that, as a regular practice, chancellors solicit from their divisional Senate names of faculty experts in green technology and building design to participate in policy implementation on the campus level. In order to more fully understand the implications of the proposed policy and guidelines, Council asked faculty experts to review the documents. Comments were received from:

Berkeley Davis; Irvine Los; Angeles Merced; Riverside San; Diego San Francisco; Dear Joe

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

September 2006 Standards Forum/Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2006 September 2006 TSP Manager's Notes 1 TEN YEARS AFTER THE NTTAA: 1996-2006 2 Committee on Nuclear Fuel Cycle Approves Two New Standards 4 Renewable Portfolio Standards Help Wind Industry to Sail 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 5 World Standards Day 2006 in

438

State Standards Reform and Student Achievement ?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Proponents of the recent and widely adopted Common Core State Standards argue that high quality curricular standards are critical to students educational success. Little clear evidence exists, however, linking the quality of such standards to student achievement. I remedy this by connecting data on state-level student achievement from 1994-2011 with measures of the quality of states curricular standards as judged by two independent organizations at three different moments in time. I show that, within states, changes in the quality of standards have little impact on overall student achievement. Improved standards do, however, raise achievement of 8th graders in low-scoring states, particularly for low-scoring students. Given the known weaknesses of U.S. middle schools, this result suggests that standards may be beneficial in settings where pedagogy would otherwise be poor. For their very helpful comments, I am grateful to Paul Peterson, Martin West and Antonio Wendland, as well as participants in the PEPG July 2012 Conference. Heather Sarsons and Shelby Lin provided outstanding research Over the last couple of decades, policymakers and educators have increasingly turned to standardsbased

Joshua Goodman; Joshua Goodman

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

The Impact of Minimum Quality Standards on Firm Entry, Exit and Product Quality: The Case of the Child Care Market  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A Theory of Minimum Standards, Journal of Politi- calto Minimum Quality Standards Regulation, NBER working paperDuopoly and Quality Standards, European Economic Review,

Hotz, V. Joseph; Xiao, Mo

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

Comments on a plan for obtaining private financing for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This review compares the latest CRBR financing plan, released to the Congress on August 1, 1983, with the private financing framework established by Department of Energy and Breeder Reactor Corporation task force reports in March 1983. We discussed these documents and our interpretation of the documents with DOE officials and members of the BRC task force. We also discussed them with representatives of one of the investment banking firms that participated in formulating the plan. We did not solicit DOE's review and comments on a draft of this report because of the short time frame involved in conducting our work. This is also in keeping with the agreement reached regarding agency comments on our May 12, 1983, report. We have discussed the report's contents with managers of the project in an effort to include DOE's views and ensure the report's accuracy.

Not Available

1983-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Commercial Lighting Solutions, Webtool Peer Review Report  

SciTech Connect

The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the beta version of the CLS webtool, which contains retail box lighting solutions. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed about which feedback should be addressed for the release of version 1.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in New York City in May 2009. Due to the volume of data (~500 comments) the methodology for addressing the peer review comments was central to the success of the ultimate goal of improving the tool. The comments were first imported into a master spreadsheet, and then grouped and organized in several layers. Solutions to each comment were then rated by importance and feasibility to determine the practicality of resolving the concerns of the commenter in the short-term or long-term. The rating system was used as an analytical tool, but the results were viewed thoughtfully to ensure that they were not the sole the factor in determining which comments were recommended for near-term resolution. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 1.0 as well as appendices containing the short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 1.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

Jones, Carol C.; Meyer, Tracy A.

2009-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

442

April 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status

443

Standard-Related Links  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Standard-Related Links. ... Association for Clinical Chemistry ACS - American Chemical Society ANSI - American National Standards Institute AOAC ...

2013-06-28T23:59:59.000Z

444

Standard Reference Materials  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Inn, KGW, Liggett, WS, and Hutchinson, JMR (1984), "The National Bureau of Standards Rocky Flats Soil Standard Reference Material," Nuclear ...

445

Federal Technical Standards Workshop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... missions, authorities, priorities, and budget resources.". ... of developing a strategic standards management plan. ... Director of NIST's Office of Standards ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

446

DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure June 30, 2010 - 3:02pm Addthis Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a draft interpretative rule clarifying its views on the application of the current residential clothes washer test procedure to machines that offer a warm rinse option that is not included in the recommended cycle for washing cotton or linen clothes. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here, until July 30, 2010. Addthis Related Articles Save Energy and More with ENERGY STAR. ENERGY STAR clothes washers use 50% less energy to wash clothes than standard washing machines. Tips: Laundry DOE Solicits Views on the Implementation of Large-Capacity Clothes Washer

447

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PROGRAM COMMENTS PROGRAM COMMENTS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 529 Program Comments Provided by Reviewers Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Comments Hydrogen Production 1. Was the program area adequately covered? Were important issues and challenges identified? Was progress clearly presented in comparison to the previous year? (Include information presented in the plenary and/or session overview presentations of the program if appropriate.) The Hydrogen Production program area was very well covered-the important issues (including material performance and capital costs for all production pathways) and challenges were clearly described and progress was shown on examples for all research fields (including novel hydrogen production methods)

448

The Standards Actions, November 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assessment Criteria, Assessment Criteria, September 1995. * DOS-STD-1032-92, Guide to Good Practices for Operations Organization and Administration, December 1992. * DOE-STD-1045-93, Guide to Good Practices for Notifications and Identification of Abnormal Events, June 1993. * DOE-STD-1061-93, Guide to Technical Standards Program Document Status as of 10/31/95 Projects Initiated The following DOE technical standards projects were recently initiated. If you are interested in participating in the development of these standards, please contact the persons listed below. * DOE-STD-3006-93, Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews, Project No. MISC-0030; Jeffery L. Roberson, DP-31; 301-903- 8026. (Note: This project will revise the standard to conform with the new DOE Orders System. Since this

449

DOE lead agency interim final and proposed rules - EEI comments...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

final and proposed rules - EEI comments 10-20-08.doc Consolidated Comments of the Edison Electric Institute ("EEI") on (1) DOE Interim Final Rule, RIN 1901-AB18, 73 Fed. Reg....

450

Public comment to Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public comment to Price-Anderson Act Public comment to Price-Anderson Act Letter from Glenn Sundstrom to DOE urging DOE to "eliminate the limit of liability in Price Anderson...

451

Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Price-Anderson Act Public Comment re Price-Anderson Act Department of Energy (DOE) Price-Anderson Act Comments from White Pine County, Nevada. The views of many "Affected Units of...

452

Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply Comments of Energy Contractors Price-Anderson Group to DOE Notice of Inquiry Reply comments by the ad hoc...

453

Property:FirstWellFlowComments | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search Property Name FirstWellFlowComments Property Type String Pages using the property "FirstWellFlowComments" Showing 1 page using this property. C...

454

Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

intervene and comments of the energy services group of Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc, on FE 99-1 Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group of...

455

Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group of Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc, on FE 99-1 Motion to intervene and comments of the energy...

456

Cohen_DoE comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Claude R. Canizares Claude R. Canizares Vice President for Research and Associate Provost Bruno Rossi Professor of Physics 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 3-234 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307 Phone 617-253-3206 Fax 617-253-3193 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY March 18, 2011 Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency US Department of Energy Office of General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington DC 20585 SUBEJCT: Reducing Regulatory Burden - EO 13563 Retrospective Review Dear Mr. Cohen: We are encouraged that President Obama has asked the federal agencies to conduct this retrospective review of existing rules to assess which should be maintained, modified,

457

Better Standards, less Ambiguity  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

iT Helps with Plant Security iT Helps with Plant Security engineers ensure Plant Uptime engineers Building Models Better Standards, less Ambiguity Department of energy on Cyber Security exclusive interview Special Pullout Section Packaging Automation review June 2008 FIFTH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE Among the many initiatives aimed at providing cyber security for the nation's critical infrastructure, the effort that led to a January 2006 document known as the "Roadmap to Secure Control Systems in the Energy Sector" stands out as one involving significant public/private sector collaboration. The Roadmap, which lays out a 10-year vision, has been recommended by the Na- tional Infrastructure Advisory Council as a model for other industries to follow in developing their own sector-specific

458

The EIS Comment-Response Process (October 2004)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

THE EIS THE EIS COMMENT-RESPONSE PROCESS October 2004 U.S. Department of Energy Environment, Safety and Health Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance The EIS Comment-Response Process Contents 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1 1.1 The Comment-Response Process...................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose of this Guidance ...............................................................................................2 1.3 Terms Used in this Guidance .........................................................................................3 2.0 General Principles for the Comment-Response Process .........................................................5

459

Hopf Structures on Standard Young Tableaux  

SciTech Connect

We review the Poirier-Reutenauer Hopf structure on Standard Young Tableaux and show that it is a distinguished member of a family of Hopf structures. The family in question is related to deformed parastatistics.

Loday, Jean-Louis [IRMA, CNRS and Univ. Strasbourg, 7 rue Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg (France); Popov, Todor [INRNE, BAS, 72 Tsarigradsko Chaussee, 1784 Sofia (Bulgaria)

2010-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

460

ACE Merit Review Report FY2004  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Merit Review and Peer Evaluation of FY 2004 DOE Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL May 18-20, 2004 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program December 2004 Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 13, 2004 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2004 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 18-20, 2004 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Comments on the Tetrad (Vielbeins)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We want to correct the misunderstandings on the tetrad (or veilbeins in general) appeared in many text books or review articles. The tetrad should be defined without any condition. $e_{\\mu a}=\\partial_\\mu X_a$ with local Lorentz coordinates $X_a$ ia wrong in many sences: it gives the condition $\\partial_\\mu e_{\

Takeshi Fukuyama

2009-05-29T23:59:59.000Z

462

Session: Program Review X Wrap-Up  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This wrap-up session at the Geothermal Energy Program Review X: Geothermal Energy and the Utility Market consisted of Closing Remarks by Roland R. Kessler and six NGA Industry Critique Panel presentations: ''Summary of Comments on DOE-Industry Cooperation by Geothermal Industry Panel'' by James B. Koenig, GeothermEx, Inc.; ''NGA Industry Critique of the Exploration Component'' by Joe L. Iovenitti, Weiss Associates; ''Critique of Drilling Research'' by Jerry Hamblin, UNOCAL Geothermal; ''Critique Panel Comments on Reservoir Engineering, DOE Geothermal Technology Development'' by Dennis Kaspereit, California Energy Company, Inc.; ''DOE Geothermal Program Review - Critique on Production'' by Douglas B. Jung, Two-Phase Engineering and Research; ''Comments on the DOE Hydrothermal Energy Conversion R&D Program'' by David L. Mendive, Geothermal Development Associates.

None

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

October 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Actions 1 Standards Actions 1 New Projects and DOE Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program

464

Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Qualcomm Incorporated Qualcomm Incorporated Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated Qualcomm is pleased to provide these detailed comments to the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") on how current and future wireless broadband communications capabilities can support the energy management needs of electric utilities, businesses, and consumers, which include requirements for the evolving and growing Smart Grid. The DOE should be applauded for timely following-up on the recommendations in the Federal Communications Commission's National Broadband Plan ("NBP") that focus on how broadband communications systems can achieve the critically important U.S. goals of energy independence and enhanced energy efficiency. See FCC NBP at 247. In this regard, Qualcomm explains how commercial

465

APS beamline standard components handbook  

SciTech Connect

It is clear that most Advanced Photon Source (APS) Collaborative Access Team (CAT) members would like to concentrate on designing specialized equipment related to their scientific programs rather than on routine or standard beamline components. Thus, an effort is in progress at the APS to identify standard and modular components of APS beamlines. Identifying standard components is a nontrivial task because these components should support diverse beamline objectives. To assist with this effort, the APS has obtained advice and help from a Beamline Standardization and Modularization Committee consisting of experts in beamline design, construction, and operation. The staff of the Experimental Facilities Division identified various components thought to be standard items for beamlines, regardless of the specific scientific objective of a particular beamline. A generic beamline layout formed the basis for this identification. This layout is based on a double-crystal monochromator as the first optical element, with the possibility of other elements to follow. Pre-engineering designs were then made of the identified standard components. The Beamline Standardization and Modularization Committee has reviewed these designs and provided very useful input regarding the specifications of these components. We realize that there will be other configurations that may require special or modified components. This Handbook in its current version (1.1) contains descriptions, specifications, and pre-engineering design drawings of these standard components. In the future, the APS plans to add engineering drawings of identified standard beamline components. Use of standard components should result in major cost reductions for CATs in the areas of beamline design and construction.

Kuzay, T.M.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Predicting the Volume of Comments on Online News Stories  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that predicts the comment volume of news articles prior to publication using five feature sets. We address Algorithms, Theory, Experimentation, Measurement Keywords Comment volume, prediction, feature engineering 1, and attempt to predict news arti- cle comment volume prior to publication time. One might raise the question

de Rijke, Maarten

467

DOE-TSPP-5-2013, Coordination of Technical Standards DRAFT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

In Concurrence Resolution - TSPP-06-2009 is the currently approved TSPP that addresses coordination of DOE Technical Standards. This procedure provides guidance on the formal coordination of the Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards in the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP). The purpose of coordination of draft DOE Technical Standards is to solicit and receive comments from interested persons and organizations in order to improve and correct DOE Technical Standards. DOE Technical Standards are coordinated through the electronic TSP RevCom process.

468

Department of Energy Technical Standards Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Technical Standards Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Department of Energy Technical Standards Program The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE. Online Standards Approved DOE Technical Standards DOE Technical Standards Archive Monthly Status Reports Subscribe RSS logo Subscribe to receive the latest DOE Approved Technical Standards via an RSS feed. Take Action Write, revise, or maintain a DOE Technical Standard Review a DOE Technical Standard at RevCom for TSP Additional Information Technical Standards Program Information

469

(RPP_standards.ps)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 7 10 20 30 40 50 70 100 0.001 0.002 0.005 0.010 0.020 0.050 0.100 0.200 0.500 1.000 Confidence level CL for fits α for confidence intervals 3 4 2 6 8 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 n = 1 χ 2 DEG's Macintosh: Adobe Illus Files/RPP_standards.ps Graphics symbols: 4.25 inches (Sports section) 2.60 inches 3.36 inches (m 1 +m 3 ) 2 10 pt captions 10 pt labels set font basic; set mode vector=off set window x 2 6.5 y 2 5.5 set labels size 1.2 set title size 1.29 set tics size 0.05 4.50 inches (Minireviews) TOPDRAWER template: PARTICLE DATA GROUP NOTES PDG-93-05 10 November 1993 Standards for Adobe Illustrator figures in the Review of Particle Properties

470

NIST Global Standards Information Global Standards News  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... 2010 The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has advised the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ... DGI), Austin, Texas, were ...

471

NIST Global Standards Information Standards Education  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Grants supporting the development of new learning resources and course modules integrating standards into the formal curriculum in Business and ...

472

The Standards Actions, October 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

sent for coordination during the past month are given below. * Safety of Magnetic Fusion Facilities: Requirements, SAFT-0028, (Steven H. Rossi, ER-54, 301-903- 5534); comments...

473

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The comment period is closed. Milestones and Documents The direct heating equipment, residential water heaters, and pool heaters standby and off mode test procedures...

474

Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report. Final: Comments and Responses to Comments  

SciTech Connect

This document is the Comments and Responses to Comments volume of the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project (Final EIS/EIR). This volume of the Final EIS/EIR provides copies of the written comments received on the Draft EIS/EIR and the leady agency responses to those comments in conformance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

None

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

475

September 2005 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page September 2005 Page September 2005 TSP Manager's Notes 1 The Halo Effect: American National Standards and the rest 2 Standards Development for Report- ing of Declarable Substances 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 8 DOE Revises "Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health

476

December 2006 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2006 December 2006 TSP Manager's Notes 1 Meeting In The Middle 2 Plain Talk for a New Generation 3 Licensing New Nuclear Power Plants 4 ANSI Government Affairs Overview 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 7 Topical Committee Developments 8 Welcome Aboard the TSMC! 8 Standards Actions 9 DOE Standards Actions 9

477

About non standard Lagrangians in cosmology  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A review of non standard Lagrangians present in modern cosmological models will be considered. Well known example of non standard Lagrangian is Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) type Lagrangian for tachyon field. Another type of non standard Lagrangian under consideration contains scalar field which describes open p-adic string tachyon and is called p-adic string theory Lagrangian. We will investigate homogenous cases of both DBI and p-adic fields and obtain Lagrangians of the standard type which have the same equations of motions as aforementioned non standard one.

Dimitrijevic, Dragoljub D.; Milosevic, Milan [Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of Nis, Visegradska 33, P.O. Box 224, 18000 Nis (Serbia)

2012-08-17T23:59:59.000Z

478

November 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical DOE Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Revisions 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association

479

April 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 Technical Standards Published 2 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical

480

DOE Technical Standards Program Standards Actions Newsletter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

* * New DOE Standard, Communicating Waste Characterization and DOT Hazard Classification Requirements * Workshops and Events * The Annual Energy Facility Contractors Group Safety Analysis Workshop * 2012 Chemical Safety and Life Cycle Management Workshop * Nuclear Safety- Related Standards Activity INSIDE THIS ISSUE April 2012 Standards Actions Technical Standards Program Newsletter www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ New DOE Standard, Communicating Waste Characterization and DOT Hazard Classification Requirements The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has a challenging mission to solve many problems posed by the legacy of the Cold War, including the transportation of unprecedented amounts of contaminated waste,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Standard Model Electroweak Measurements at LEP  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The current status of electroweak physics results from LEP is reviewed. Particular emphasis is placed on the latest results on the properties of the Z and W bosons. The updated status of the global electroweak fit to the standard model and the resulting standard model Higgs mass limits are presented.

F. Spano'

2006-05-19T23:59:59.000Z

482

Financial Impact of Energy Efficiency under a Federal Renewable Electricity Standard: Case Study of a Kansas "super-utility"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

efficiency into a sustainable energy portfolio standard. Theperspective. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 13:100-

Cappers, Peter

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

483

May 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Revisions 1 DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 04-27-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 25

484

Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative is a generation and transmission cooperative (G&T) that provides the wholesale electrical requirements and other services for 25 electric distribution cooperatives and 16 municipal utilities in the Upper Midwest. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges More Documents & Publications AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Florida Power and Light Comments on Smart Grid Request For Information (RFI): Addressing Policy & Logistical Challenges.

485

Proposed standby gasoline rationing plan: public comments  

SciTech Connect

Under the proposed plan, DOE would allocate ration rights (rights to purchase gasoline) to owners of registered vehicles. All vehicles in a given class would receive the same entitlement. Essential services would receive supplemental allotments of ration rights as pririty firms. Once every 3 months, ration checks would be mailed out to all vehicle registrants, allotting them a certain amount of ration rights. These checks would then be cashed at Coupon Issuance Points, where the bearer would receive ration coupons to be used at gasoline stations. Large users of gasoline could deposit their allotment checks in accounts at ration banks. Coupons or checks would be freely exchangeable in a white market. A certain percentage of the gasoline supply would be set aside in reserve for use in national emergencies. When the plan was published in the Federal Register, public comments were requested. DOE also solicited comments from private citizens, public interest groups, business and industry, state and local governments. A total of 1126 responses were reveived and these are analyzed in this paper. The second part of the report describes how the comments were classified, and gives a statistical breakdown of the major responses. The last section is a discussion and analysis of theissue raised by commenting agencies, firms, associations, and individuals. (MCW)

1978-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

Solar cells with a twist Comments ( 35)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Solar cells with a twist Article Comments ( 35) JULIE STEENHUYSEN REUTERS OCTOBER 7, 2008 AT 9:58 AM EDT CHICAGO -- U.S. researchers have found a way to make efficient silicon-based solar cells of buildings as opportunities for solar energy," Prof. Rogers said in a telephone interview. Solar cells, which

Rogers, John A.

487

ORISE: Inter-rater Reliability brings Standardization to Scientific Peer  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standardization of Scientific Peer Reviews Standardization of Scientific Peer Reviews IRR: A New Initiative Aims to Bring Standardization to ORISE Scientific Peer Reviews In some peer reviews, clear instructions on the basis for rating proposals may not be given to reviewers. As a result, the reviewers' final ratings can leave much room for interpretation thanks to varying degrees of reviewer knowledge and experience... all of which contribute to the final rating number. For instance, the rating scale for a particular review is 1 to 5 (with 1 being the highest). One reviewer rates the proposal a 2, and a second reviewer rates the same proposal a 4 but notes "this is the best proposal" he's ever seen. If the proposal was the best ever, why didn't he rate the proposal a 1? And, was the range in their scores due

488

DOE Standard, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE STD-xxxx-xx DOE STD-xxxx-xx December 2010 DOE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENTS IN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NUCLEAR SAFETY APPLICATIONS FOR INTERIM USE AND COMMENT U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This draft, December 2010, prepared by the Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance, has not been approved and is subject to modification. Project No. SAFT-0132 NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE AREA SAFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-xxxx-xx i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... i

489

DOE Standard, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE STD-xxxx-xx DOE STD-xxxx-xx December 2010 DOE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENTS IN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NUCLEAR SAFETY APPLICATIONS FOR INTERIM USE AND COMMENT U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This draft, December 2010, prepared by the Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance, has not been approved and is subject to modification. Project No. SAFT-0132 NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE AREA SAFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-xxxx-xx i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... i

490

Energy Efficiency Standards and Labels in North America: Opportunities for Harmonization  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Equipment Energy Efficiency Committee. Available fromE. McMahon. 2001. Energy-Efficiency Labels and Standards: ALloyd. 1999. Review of energy efficiency test standards and

Wiel, Stephen

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

491

Environmental, safety and health standards identification for geothermal energy. Report 6: neat stress  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The following are discussed: the physiological effects of heat stress, monitoring equipment, review of existing standards, and evaluation of existing standards. (MHR)

Quilici, D.G.; Anderson, R.G.; Martin, J.B.

1979-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

492

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Notice is hereby given that two documents are publicly available and the Department of Energy is requesting public comments. The documents are the Electricity Distribution System Workshop Discussion Summary and the Electricity Transmission System Workshop Discussion Summary. Written comments are to be received no later than March 25, 2013. For details on how to submit comments, please view the Federal Register Notice, below. Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops

493

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Docket No. EO-05-01: In accordance with Order No. 202-06-1, issued by the Department of Energy on February 17, 2006. Potomac Electric Power Company and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. jointly submit these comments and answer to the requests for rehearing submitted by the City of Alexandria, Virginia and the Director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality in the captioned proceeding . Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public

494

AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in response to the Request for Information (Request or RFI) on smart grid policy and logistical challenges, published by the Department of Energy (DOE) on September 16, 2010 AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges More Documents & Publications Comments on Smart Grid data access Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access

495

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Notice is hereby given that two documents are publicly available and the Department of Energy is requesting public comments. The documents are the Electricity Distribution System Workshop Discussion Summary and the Electricity Transmission System Workshop Discussion Summary. Written comments are to be received no later than March 25, 2013. For details on how to submit comments, please view the Federal Register Notice, below. Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops

496

American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules American Transmission Company Comments - 216h Interim Final Rules American Transmission Company LLC, by its corporate manager, ATC Management Inc. (collectively "ATCLLC") is pleased to have the opportunity to provide the following comments on the additional matters to be considered by DOE in connection with the Rules. Interim Final Rule Comments, RIN 1901-AB18 Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities More Documents & Publications Comments of the Staff of the public utilities commission of the state of California on the interim final rule Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities

497

NETL: Publication Standards Manual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standards Manual Publications Publication Standards Manual Click on the logo to access the NETL Publication Standards Manual 2003 APEX Logo Click on the logo or on the link below...

498

Thick Buildings [Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

STANDARDS The idea of tracts of windowless indoor space hassider U.S. practices and standards? building with four sidesAs these codes and standards change future generations may

Coffin, Christie Johnson

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

499

Questioning Copyright in Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

adoption and use of privately drafted industry standards).arising from abuses of standard-setting processes are well-at 7. Compliance with standards has often implicated patent

Samuelson, Pam

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

500

Reply To The Comment By D D Blackwell And G R Priest On Heat Flow From Four  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Reply To The Comment By D D Blackwell And G R Priest On Heat Flow From Four Reply To The Comment By D D Blackwell And G R Priest On Heat Flow From Four New Research Drill Holes In The Western Cascades, Oregon, Usa By S E Ingebritsen, M A Scholl And D R Sherrod Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Journal Article: Reply To The Comment By D D Blackwell And G R Priest On Heat Flow From Four New Research Drill Holes In The Western Cascades, Oregon, Usa By S E Ingebritsen, M A Scholl And D R Sherrod Details Activities (1) Areas (1) Regions (0) Abstract: Unavailable Author(s): S. E. Ingebritsen, M. A. Scholl, D. R. Sherrod Published: Geothermics, 1996 Document Number: Unavailable DOI: Unavailable Source: View Original Journal Article Geothermal Literature Review At Breitenbush Hot Springs Area (Ingebritsen, Et Al., 1996)