Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

SRREN Comment and Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help USGCRP SRREN Home | Submit your comments | Log In | Help Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation Introduction: As part of the Final Government Distribution of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN), the U.S. Government is conducting a review of the Summary for Policymakers for the report. This web site is posted on the internet for the sole purpose of facilitating the U.S. Government review at this time. The U.S. Government provided comments previously as part of the Government and Expert Review hosted on this web site. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research

2

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio...

3

Standard Review Plan Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Milestones Review & Approval Standard Review Plan (SRP) E n v i r o n m e n t a l M a n a g e m e n t DOE - EM - SRP - 2010 2nd Edition Overview March 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 1 Standard Review Plan Overview Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision Milestones Review and Approval The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission-critical projects/facilities. Coupled with this ongoing mission is the added responsibility for EM to diligently leverage and apply American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds to accelerate the completion of its

4

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Comment Resolution - July 1, 2009 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) - August 26, 2009 This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as "DOE Components") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

5

Standard Review Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Standard Review Plan (SRP) serves as the corporate framework designed to formalize the Department of Energy (DOE) and EM institutional processes and requirements associated with the review of project activities in support of CD approvals. The SRP has been developed as a collaborative effort between EM and the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS), Office of the Under Secretary. It is modeled after similar principles used extensively and successfully by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for evaluating U.S. commercial nuclear industry licensed activities.

6

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

7

Standard Review Plan - Overview | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Standard Review Plan - Overview Standard Review Plan - Overview The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and...

8

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Supporting documentation for the peer review of the appliance energy efficiency standards rulemaking process.

9

DOE Review of Regulations- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any...

10

Standard Review Plan- Code of Record  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The objective of this Standard Review Plan (SRP) on Code of Record (COR) is to provide guidance for a uniform review of the COR for DOE nuclear projects.

11

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supporting documentation for the peer review of the appliance energy efficiency standards rulemaking process. peerreviewdocumentation.pdf More Documents & Publications Report to...

12

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Conservation Standards Rulemaking Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report Prepared Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy February 2007 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 6 2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................... 6 3. SCOPE ........................................................................................................................... 7

13

Energy Efficiency Program for Residential Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Dishwashers, Reopening of the Comment Period  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Efficiency Program for Residential Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Dishwashers, Reopening of the Comment Period

14

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking The Department of Energy assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the appliance energy...

15

Code of Record Standard Review Plan (SRP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The objective of this Standard Review Plan (SRP) on Code of Record (COR) is to provide guidance for a uniform review of the COR for DOE nuclear projects. DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets.

16

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

17

ISSUANCE 2015-01-26: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for High-Intensity Lamps, Notice to Reopen Comment Period  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for High-Intensity Lamps, Notice to Reopen Comment Period

18

Comparing Comments in the L1 and the L2 during the Peer Review Process.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??This study analyzes the use of ESL students L1 and L2 during the peer review process in terms of the number of comments and suggestions (more)

Myers, Terra Suzanne

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Fourth RFI_Comment on Regulatory Review.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

47328 47328 Vol. 77, No. 153 Wednesday, August 8, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The purpose of DOE's review is to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its

20

Proposed modifications of NRC's standard review plan for seismic analysis  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The paper briefly describes the major changes in seismic analysis and design criteria proposed in the U.S. NRC Standard Review Plan. The changes to the SRP also reflect the resolution of Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-40, Seismic Design Criteria. The proposed revision provides explicit guidelines for (1) developing site-specific spectra; (2) determination of suitable design time history (ies); (3) the location of seismic input motion; (4) developing floor response spectra; (5) soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis; (6) analysis of above-ground Seismic Category 1 tanks; and (7) analysis of buried piping and structures. The proposed revision, together with its background material, was issued for public comments on 19 May, 1988, together with a solicitation to address specific questions related to SSI analysis. These are discussed in the paper. The paper concludes with a note on the importance of the progress made and outlines the areas requiring further studies and research.

G. Bagchi; D. Jeng; H. Ashar

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Comment  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The article by Douglas Arent, Alison Wise, and Rachel Gelman provides an excellent overview on the rapid development of the renewable energy sector. The article focuses on trends in renewable energy markets, the status and prospects of renewable energy technology (RET), and policy frameworks for RETs. It is more reticent on the role of renewable energy for combating global warming. This acknowledges the fact that a full assessment of the potential contribution of \\{RETs\\} requires an integrated systems perspective, including consideration of the climate change mitigation requirement and the status and prospects of alternative mitigation options (Edenhofer et al., 2009, 2010; Clarke et al., 2009). This comment will briefly review the article's perspective on the trends and prospects of renewable energy, and then move on to a short discussion of some system-level considerations for assessing the role of renewable energy for combating global warming.

Elmar Kriegler

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

22

Technical issues related to NUREG 0800, Chapter 18: Human Factors Engineering/Standard Review Plan  

SciTech Connect

The revision of Chapter 18 of NUREG 0800, Human Factors Engineering Standard Review Plan (SRP) will be based on SECY 82-111 and guidance contained in NUREG 0700, NUREG 0801 and NUREG 0835, plus other references. In conducting field reviews of control rooms, the NRC has identified technical issues which can be used to enhance the development of the revised version of NUREG 0800, and to establish priorities among the list of possible Branch Technical Positions (BTP) in NUREG 0800, Rev. 0, Table 18.0-2. This report is a compilation of comments and suggestions from the people who used NUREG 0700 in the Control Room field reviews. This information was used to establish possible BTP topic priorities so that the most important BTPs could be issued first. The comments and suggestions are included for HFEB review in conjunction with the table of priorities.

Savage, J.W.

1982-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

23

EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing Draft Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement DOE has extended the comment period for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemential EIS through October 10 and announces an additional Public Hearing in Espanola, NM. EIS-0283-S2-CommentExtension-2012.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0312: Notice of Availability of the Bonneville Power Administration Administrator's Record of Decision UDAC Meeting - January 2012 Electricity Advisory Committee Notice of Open Meeting October 2 and 3, 2013: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 176 - September 11, 2013

24

ISSUANCE 2015-02-03: Energy Efficiency Program for Residential Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products, Reopening of Public Comment Period  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Efficiency Program for Residential Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products, Reopening of Public Comment Period

25

Standard Operating Procedure Review and Reduce Personally Identifiable  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Standard Operating Procedure Review and Reduce Personally Identifiable Information (PH the NASA Plan for Reviewing and Reducing PH, assuring that NASA retains only the minimum PH holdings ITS 1382.l, NASA Plan for Reviewing and

Christian, Eric

26

EIS-0350-S1: Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing EIS-0350-S1: Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico DOE/EIS-0350, Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Extension of the Public Review and Comment Period and Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing for the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 76 FR 28222 (May 2011)

27

Standard Review Plan (SRP) Modules | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Assurance » Standard Quality Assurance » Standard Review Plan (SRP) Modules Standard Review Plan (SRP) Modules Standard Review Plan - Critical Decision Handbook Overview Project Management Project Execution Plan Review Module (RM) Risk Management RM Integrated Project Team RM Earned Value Management System RM Acquisition Strategy RM Decommissioning Plan RM Site Transition Guidance Engineering and Design Conceptual Design RM Preliminary Design RM Final Design RM Construction Readiness RM Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan RM Readiness Review RM Seismic Design Expectations Report Technology Readiness Assessment Report External Technical Review Report Preparation for Facility Operations RM Safety Safety Design Strategy RM Conceptual Safety Design RM Preliminary Safety Design RM Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM

28

Can Florida's Legislative Standard of Review for Small-Scale Land Use Amendments Be Justified?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Affecting Standards of Review for Rezonings and for Planthe same standard of review for all comprehensive planAffecting Standards of Review for Rezonings and for Plan

Appleman, Bernard R.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

Comments of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the Draft Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Comments of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the Draft Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps individual reports were submitted by the four members of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the draft to the peer-review comments were developed by ERDC in cooperation with the Caribbean Islands working group

US Army Corps of Engineers

30

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rulemaking Rulemaking Peer Review Report - Supporting Documentation Submitted Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy March 2007 Table of Contents PROJECT ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 16 SLIDE PRESENTATIONS ON JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .................................................. 104 PEER REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM.................................................................. 201 PEER REVIEW AGENDA JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .........................................................

31

Review of international standards for dosemeters  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......example, for EMC, software, safety of data, etc...Legal Metrology. Radiation protection instrumentation - Software Guide (Measuring...Radiation Dosage Radiation Protection standards...Radiometry standards Safety Management organization......

R. Behrens; P. Ambrosi

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

Comparisons of ANSI standards cited in the NRC standard review plan, NUREG-0800 and related documents  

SciTech Connect

This report provides the results of comparisons of the cited and latest versions of ANSI standards cited in the NRC Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG 0800) and related documents. The comparisons were performed by Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories in support of the NRC`s Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program. Significant changes to the standards, from the cited version to the latest version, are described and discussed in a tabular format for each standard. Recommendations for updating each citation in the Standard Review Plan are presented. Technical considerations and suggested changes are included for related regulatory documents (i.e., Regulatory Guides and the Code of Federal Regulations) citing the standard. The results and recommendations presented in this document have not been subjected to NRC staff review.

Ankrum, A.R.; Bohlander, K.L.; Gilbert, E.R.; Pawlowski, R.A.; Spiesman, J.B. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

Comparisons of ASTM standards cited in the NRC standard review plan, NUREG-0800 and related documents  

SciTech Connect

This report provides the results of comparisons of the cited and latest versions of ASTM standards cited in the NRC Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG 0800) and related documents. The comparisons were performed by Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories in support of the NRC`s Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program. Significant changes to the standards, from the cited version to the latest version, are described and discussed in a tabular format for each standard. Recommendations for updating each citation in the Standard Review Plan are presented. Technical considerations and suggested changes are included for related regulatory documents (i.e., Regulatory Guides and the Code of Federal Regulations) citing the standard. The results and recommendations presented in this document have not been subjected to NRC staff review.

Ankrum, A.R.; Bohlander, K.L.; Gilbert, E.R.; Pawlowski, R.A.; Spiesman, J.B.

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE prepared this report in response to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review."

35

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

response to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review." peerreviewreport021507.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy...

36

Safety Design Strategy Standard Review Plan (SRP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This SRP on Safety Design Strategy (SDS) provides the starting point for a set of corporate Performance Objectives and Criteria contain in Appendix A. Review teams are expected to build on these and develop additional project-specific Lines of Inquiry, as needed. The criteria and the review process are intended to be used on an ongoing basis during the appropriate CD phase to ensure that issues are identified and resolved.

37

Peer Review of NRC Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) Models underwent a Peer Review using ASME PRA standard (Addendum C) as endorsed by NRC in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200. The review was performed by a mix of industry probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) experts and NRC PRA experts. Representative SPAR models, one PWR and one BWR, were reviewed against Capability Category I of the ASME PRA standard. Capability Category I was selected as the basis for review due to the specific uses/applications of the SPAR models. The BWR SPAR model was reviewed against 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements; however, based on the Capability Category I level of review and the absence of internal flooding and containment performance (LERF) logic only 216 requirements were determined to be applicable. Based on the review, the BWR SPAR model met 139 of the 216 supporting requirements. The review also generated 200 findings or suggestions. Of these 200 findings and suggestions 142 were findings and 58 were suggestions. The PWR SPAR model was also evaluated against the same 331 ASME PRA Standard Supporting Requirements. Of these requirements only 215 were deemed appropriate for the review (for the same reason as noted for the BWR). The PWR review determined that 125 of the 215 supporting requirements met Capability Category I or greater. The review identified 101 findings or suggestions (76 findings and 25 suggestions). These findings or suggestions were developed to identify areas where SPAR models could be enhanced. A process to prioritize and incorporate the findings/suggestions supporting requirements into the SPAR models is being developed. The prioritization process focuses on those findings that will enhance the accuracy, completeness and usability of the SPAR models.

Anthony Koonce; James Knudsen; Robert Buell

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

Appliance Standards Program Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presenter: John Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Appliance and Equipment Standards Program. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

39

International Review of Framework for Standards & Labeling Setting and  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

International Review of Framework for Standards & Labeling Setting and International Review of Framework for Standards & Labeling Setting and Development Title International Review of Framework for Standards & Labeling Setting and Development Publication Type Report Year of Publication 2012 Authors Zhou, Nan, Nina Zheng Khanna, David Fridley, and John Romankiewicz Date Published 09/2012 Publisher Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Keywords appliance, framework, labeling, standards, techno-economics analyses Abstract As appliance energy efficiency standards and labeling (S&L) programs reach a broader geographic and product scope, a series of sophisticated and complex technical and economic analyses have been adopted by different countries in the world to support and enhance these growing S&L programs. The initial supporting techno-economic and impact analyses for S&L development make up a defined framework and process for setting and developing appropriate appliance efficiency standards and labeling programs. This report reviews in-depth the existing framework for standards setting and label development in the well-established programs of the U.S., Australia and the EU to identify and evaluate major trends in how and why key analyses are undertaken and to understand major similarities and differences between each of the frameworks.

40

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES/OBJECTIVES OF BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? WHY IS BUSINESS/CONTRACT MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? Because of the criticality of the work being conducted under its contracts and the increasing pressure being put on its budgets, the Department needs to ensure that work under its contracts: * Is appropriate, appropriately documented and performance-based; * Does not violate restrictions or constraints on the use of Department of Energy (DOE)-controlled facilities; * Complies with appropriate DOE directives; * That voluntary consensus standards are used in preference to Government unique standards; * Is carried out in a manner that protects the workers, public and the environment against hazards; * Is properly authorized; and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) provides these comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled Energy Conservation Program: Energy...

42

REVIEW ARTICLE Standard methods for pollination research with Apis  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REVIEW ARTICLE Standard methods for pollination research with Apis mellifera Keith S Delaplane1 polinización con Apis mellifera Resumen En este capítulo se presenta una síntesis de las recomendaciones para methods for pollination research with Apis mellifera. In V Dietemann; J D Ellis; P Neumann (Eds

Delaplane, Keith S.

43

Environmental Standard Review Plan for the review of license renewal applications for nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Standard Review Plan for the Review of License Applications for Nuclear Power Plants (ESRP-LR) is to be used by the NRC staff when performing environmental reviews of applications for the renewal of power reactor licenses. The use of the ESRP-LR provides a framework for the staff to determine whether or not environmental issues important to license renewal have been identified and the impacts evaluated and provides acceptance standards to help the reviewers comply with the National Environmental Policy Act.

O'Brien, J.; Kim, T.J.; Reynolds, S.

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

Comments of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the Arid West Regional Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Comments of the Independent Peer-Review Team for the Arid West Regional Supplement to the 1987 Working Group Comments and recommendations developed by the peer-review team are given in Columns B reviews were performed in accordance with OMB guidelines." OMB guidelines were not available to the Peer

US Army Corps of Engineers

45

COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ON JUNE 2003 FOURTH EXTERNAL REVIEW DRAFT CRITERIA DOCUMENT FOR PARTICULATE MATTER  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/OFFICE OF FOSSIL COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/OFFICE OF FOSSIL ENERGY STAFF ON JUNE 2003 FOURTH EXTERNAL REVIEW DRAFT CRITERIA DOCUMENT FOR PARTICULATE MATTER Summary and Conclusions The Fourth External Review Draft Criteria Document for Particulate Matter (henceforth, the CD) is a very comprehensive review of both epidemiological and toxicological research into the health effects of particulate matter (PM) in ambient air. DOE/Office of Fossil Energy offers the following comments on it. OMB's "Principles and Procedures" memorandum to agencies states: "OIRA's [OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs] review also evaluates, on occasion in consultation with the Office of Science and Technology Policy, whether the agency has, in assessing exposure to a risk or an environmental

46

Comparisons of ANS, ASME, AWS, and NFPA standards cited in the NRC standard review plan, NUREG-0800, and related documents  

SciTech Connect

This report provides the results of comparisons of the cited and latest versions of ANS, ASME, AWS and NFPA standards cited in the NRC Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG 0800) and related documents. The comparisons were performed by Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories in support of the NRC`s Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program. Significant changes to the standards, from the cited version to the latest version, are described and discussed in a tabular format for each standard. Recommendations for updating each citation in the Standard Review Plan are presented. Technical considerations and suggested changes are included for related regulatory documents (i.e., Regulatory Guides and the Code of Federal Regulations) citing the standard. The results and recommendations presented in this document have not been subjected to NRC staff review.

Ankrum, A.R.; Bohlander, K.L.; Gilbert, E.R.; Spiesman, J.B. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

Surface Water Quality Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS AAs part of the ongoing program to manage Texaswater quality, the Texas Commission onEnvironmental Quality (TCEQ) is currently review- ing the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards, including the standards... for contact recreation use. Preliminary public comment plus input from the Surface Water Quality Standards Advisory Work Group have provided guidance on options available for revising the standards, said Jim Davenport, leader of the TCEQ Water Quality...

Wythe, Kathy

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

48

2014-07-28 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standard for Computer and Battery Backup Systems; Extension of Public Comment Period  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register extension of the public comment period regarding Energy Conservation Standards for Computer and Battery Backup Systems, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on July 28, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

49

2015-01-26 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for General Service Lamps; Extension of Public Comment Period  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register extension of comment period regarding energy conservation standards for general service lamps, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on January 26, 2015. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

50

Standards Actions, July 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Program Document Status 07-01-2002 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 46 Out for Comment - 14 Published this Month - 2 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 11 Reaffirmation in Progress - 12 Cancellation Pending - 7 Cancellation in Progress - 1 No Current Action - 19 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Published 1 American National Standards Institute 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- July 2002 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated

51

Standards Actions, May 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30-2001 30-2001 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 39 Out for Comment - 19 Published this Month - 0 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 4 Reaffirmation in Progress - 23 Cancellation Pending - 9 Cancellation in Progress - 18 No Current Action - 12 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation 1 Proposed Cancellation of DOE Technical Standards 2 Published DOE Technical Standards 3 American National Standards Institute 3 American National Standards 6 American Society for Testing and Materials 6 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. May 2001 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated

52

Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening Line Management Oversight and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standard Review Plan Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities August 2013 2 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Preparation for Facility Operations Applicability CD-0 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 Operation Post Operation August 2013 3 Table of Contents Objective ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Requirements .................................................................................................................................. 4 Primary References ......................................................................................................................... 6

53

DOE Extends Comment Period for Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations. The Department is interested in receiving comment on the...

54

Development of USNRC standard review plan 3.6.3 for leak-before-break applications to nuclear power plants  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In the United States, it is now permissible to eliminate the dynamic effects of postulated high energy pipe ruptures from the design basis of nuclear power plants using Leak-Before-Break (LBB) technology. To provide review guidance for the implementation of LBB, a new Standard Review Plan (SRP) 3.6.3 was issued for public comment. Based upon public comments received and advances in fracture mechanics application, further development of SRP 3.6.3 is in progress. SRP 3.6.3 will outline the review procedures and acceptance criteria for LBB licensing applications. A deterministic fracture mechanics evaluation accounting for material toughness will be required. Margins on load, crack size, and leakage will be specified and the load combination methods and leakage detection sensitivity will be described. Piping particularly susceptible to failure from potential degradation mechanisms will be excluded from the application of LBB. The design basis of containment, emergency core cooling systems, and environmental qualification of equipment in the context of LBB applicability will be clarified.

K. Wichman; S. Lee

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

55

PHYSICAL REVIEW E 84, 048302 (2011) Reply to "Comment on `Heat transfer and fluid flow in microchannels and nanochannels  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

PHYSICAL REVIEW E 84, 048302 (2011) Reply to "Comment on `Heat transfer and fluid flow) model for high-Knudsen-number (Kn) flow and heat transfer, in the range of Kn 1. We present various studies employing the LBGK model for high-Kn flow and heat transfer simulations. It is concluded that

Luo, Li-Shi

56

AHAM Comments_DOE Reg Review Sept 2012_FINAL.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 7, 2012 September 7, 2012 By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). AHAM represents manufacturers of major, portable and floor care home appliances, and suppliers to the industry. AHAM's more than 150 members employ tens of thousands of people in the U.S. and produce more than 95% of the household appliances shipped for sale within the

57

November 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 10-25-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 23 Out for Comment - 16 Published in September - 0 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6

58

Issuance 2014-11-21:Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Ceiling Fans: Availability of the Preliminary Technical Support Document, Notice of Comment Period Extension  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Ceiling Fans: Availability of the Preliminary Technical Support Document, Notice of Comment Period Extension

59

Post-2011 Phase 2 Public Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

September 22, 2014 BPA EE Post-2011 Review Response to Public Comment 1 BPA Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Review Response to Public Comment The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)...

60

Review of standards of protection for pregnant workers and their offspring  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......IAEA Basic Safety Standards (BSS) make clear...the basis of a review of such guidance...International Action Plan for Occupational...the basis of a review of such guidance...International Action Plan for Occupational...Journal Article Review | 0 Radioisotopes | Biological Assay standards Female Humans......

R. Cruz Surez; P. Berard; J. D. Harrison; D. R. Melo; D. Nosske; M. Stabin; C. Challeton-de Vathaire

2007-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

2014-03-12 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial and Industrial Air Compressors; Notice of Public Meeting and Extension of Comment Period  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register notice of public meeting and extension of public comment period regarding energy conservation standards for commercial and industrial air compressors, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on March 12, 2014.

62

Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix T (Second Continued Volume): Comments & Responses.  

SciTech Connect

This is Appendix T (second continued volume) giving public comments and responses to the final environmental impact statement for the Columbia River System.

Columbia River System Operation Review (U.S.)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

Standard Energy Efficiency Database Platform- 2013 BTO Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Commercial Buildings Integration Project for the 2013 Building Technologies Office's Program Peer Review

64

Addressing the inclusion of English language learners the educational accountability system:lessons learned from peer review.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??This study investigated the inclusion of English language learners (ELLs) in state standards and assessments, as measured by comments made by peer reviewers in the (more)

Christensen, Laurene L.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

65

Standards Actions, February 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 5 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 6 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 11 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 12 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 01-23-2004 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 36 Out for Comment - 23 Published in January - 3 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 13 Reaffirmation in Progress - 26 Cancellation Pending - 1 Cancellation in Progress - 3 No Current Action - 0 Inside This Visit the Technical Standards Program

66

July 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 06-28-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 21 Out for Comment - 10 Published in June - 2 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-6 Revision in Progress-3

67

BROUHAHA OVER PEER REVIEW  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

BROUHAHA OVER PEER REVIEW ... And it involves a collaborative process through which reports, and even the science itself, are revisitedand, with hope, improvedin response to reviewer comments. ... And increasingly, regulatory agencies are peer reviewing scientific documents, such as risk assessments, that guide establishment of rules and standards. ...

CHERYL HOGUE

2004-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

68

Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Planning and Conducting Readiness Reviews DOE O 422.1, Admin Chg 1, Conduct of Operations, June 2013 DOE O 426.2, Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and...

69

Corneal Topography: A review, new ANSI standards and problems to solve Stanley A. Klein  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Corneal Topography: A review, new ANSI standards and problems to solve Stanley A. Klein School based instruments is presented. 2. a summary of and commentary on the newly issued ANSI standards topographers" by the ANSI standard), has the advantage of being able to measure corneal thickness as well

Klein, Stanley

70

Standard Energy Efficiency Data (SEED) Platform- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Standard Energy Efficiency Data (SEED) software application helps organizations easily manage data on the energy performance of large groups of buildings, thus also improving the consistency and interoperability of the data.

71

Submit a Public Comment on The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) External Merit Review Meeting Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) Initiative within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is a multi-year DOE research initiative targeting significant reductions in the cost of wind energy through an improved understanding of the complex physics of the wind resource and interaction with wind farms. DOE is now accepting public comments on the meeting summary for the A2e Initiative. DOE held an A2e External Merit Review in Washington, DC, on February 4-5, 2014. The External Review Panel reviewed the current program planning and provided suggestions on the formulation of A2e strategy, goals and implementation approaches.

72

April 2004 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE Technical Standards recently sent for coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 7 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 8 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 12 National Fire Protection Association 12 ry DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 03-26-2004 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 37 Out for Comment - 21 Published in March - 2 5-Year Review Status Revision in Progress - 13 Reaffirmation inProgress - 26 Cancellation Pending - 1

73

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1950 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS R. E. BEARD Statistics...Price 20s. [453 ] REVIEWS Statistics, Volume I...regard to the mathematical standard required by the Institute...distributions.' The general plan of the book is first......

R. E. BEARD

1950-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

74

August 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 07-27-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 27 Out for Comment - 24 Published in June - 0 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at

75

October 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 09-27-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 26 Out for Comment - 27 Published in September - 0 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at

76

April 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notices 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 1 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 3-28-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 25 Out for Comment - 11 Published in March - 0 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-6 Revisions in Progress-4 Proposed for Reaffirmation-3 Reaffirmations in Progress-24 Cancellations Pending-11 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards

77

August 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 07-26-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 22 Out for Comment - 16 Published in July - 2 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-9 Cancellation in Progress-0

78

The Standards Actions, February 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UN UN I T E D S T A T ES O F A M E R IC A D E P A R T M E NT O F E N E R G Y February 1997 Standards DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Standards Managers (TSM) will provide selected reviewers with copies for comment. If you wish to comment on a particular document, please notify your TSM. DOE documents sent for coordination during the past month are given below. * Radiological Control, SAFT- 0039, (Judith Foulke, EH-52, 301-903-5865, Judy.Foulke@hq.doe.gov); comments due May 23, 1997 . DOE Standards and Other Documents DOE employees and DOE contractors may obtain copies from the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; telephone 423-576-8401 or FAX 423-576-5728. Subcontractors and the general public may obtain copies from

79

The Standards Actions, November 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Standards Managers (TSM) will provide selected reviewers with copies for comment. If you wish to comment on a particular document, please notify your TSM. DOE documents sent for coordination during the past month are given below. * Supplementary Guidance and Design Experience for DOE Fusion Safety Standards, SAFT-0059, (Steve Herring, INEL, 208-525-9497, sth@inel.gov. * Risk-Based Prioritization of DOE Activities, MISC-0022, (Kenneth P . Ferlic, DP-45, 301-903-6703, Kenneth.Ferlic@dp.doe.gov); comments due November 4, 1996. Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: * DOE-STD-1095-95, Department of Energy Laboratory Accredi- tation Program for Personnel Dosimetry Systems, December

80

The Standards Actions, April 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Standards Managers (TSM) will provide selected reviewers with copies for comment. The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Pro- gram Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this docu- ment, please notify your TSM. * Radiological Safety Training for Radiation Producing Devices, 6910-0057, (Peter O'Connell, EH-52, 301-903-5641, Peter.O'Connell@eh.doe.gov); comments due April 29, 1997. DOE Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: * DOE-STD-3020-97, Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors, January 1997. * DOE-HDBK-1200-97, Guide to Good Practices for Developing

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

August 2001 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-31-2001 7-31-2001 Activity Summary In Conversion-4 In Preparation-43 Out for Comment-17 Published this Month-0 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress-6 Reaffirmation in Progress-23 Cancellation Pending-4 Cancellation in Progress-12 Proposed for Cancellation-13 No Current Action-11 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Reaffirmed 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 2 American National Standards Institute 2 American National Standards 4 American Society for Testing and Materials 5 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- August 2001 Standards

82

REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......continuity management standards: the earlier British standard BS 25999 and the international...requirements of the latter standard. The fourth part of...Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information...first three chapters review the threat landscape......

Project Management for IT-related Projects (Second Edition) ? M & A Integration: How to do it ? Pegasus: The Seminal Early Computer ? The Computer Incident Response Planning Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information at Risk ? Interop The Promise; Perils of Highly Interconnected Systems ? Business continuity management systems

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

2014-09-05 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Automatic Commercial Ice Makers; Notice of Data Availability and Request for Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register notice of data availability and request for comment regarding energy conservation standards for automatic commercial ice makers, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on September 5, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

84

2014-12-31 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial and Industrial Fans and Blowers; Extension of Comment Period for Notice of Data Availability  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register extension of comment period for notice of data availability regarding energy conservation standards for commercial and industrial fans and blowers, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on December 31, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

85

Standards Actions, July 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-27-2001 6-27-2001 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 42 Out for Comment - 15 Published this Month - 1 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 4 Reaffirmation in Progress - 2 Supersedure in Progress - 6 Cancellation Pending - 8 Cancellation in Progress - 2 No Current Action - 35 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Published 1 American National Standards Institute 2 American National Standards 3 American Society for Testing and Materials 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. July 2001 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Projects Initiated

86

Standards Actions - April 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-28-2002 3-28-2002 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 44 Out for Comment - 13 Published this Month - 2 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 4 Reaffirmation in Progress - 2 Supersedure in Progress - 6 Cancellation Pending - 8 Cancellation in Progress - 2 No Current Action - 35 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Project Canceled 1 DOE Technical Standard Recently Sent for Coordination 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Published 2 American National Standards Institute 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- April 2002 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Project Canceled

87

February 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Technical Standards Program Document Status 1-18-2005 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 25 Out for Comment - 10 Published in January - 3 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-6 Revision in Progress-4 Proposed for Reaffirmation-3 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-16 Cancellation in Progress-0 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ February 2005 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects,

88

July 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 06-28-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 23 Out for Comment - 14 Published in June - 0 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-9 Cancellation in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/ techstds/ July 2006 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects,

89

The Standards Actions, November 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sent Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Standards Managers (TSM) will provide selected reviewers with copies for comment. The full text of these documents is available on the Technical Standards Program Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • Guidance for Identifying, Reporting, and Tracking Nuclear Safety Noncompliances (revision to DOE-HDBK-1089- 95), Project Number SAFT- 0066; Steve Zobel, EH-10; 301- 903-2615, FAX 301-903-0081, Steve.Zobel@hq.doe.gov; comments due December 19, 1997. • Integration of Safety and Health Into Facility Disposition Activi- ties, Vol. 1 - Technical Standard, Vol. 2 - Appendices, Project Number SAFT-0060; Tony Eng, EH-53; 301-903-4210, FAX 301-

90

DOE Standards Actions, February 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Standards Projects Initiated Technical Standards Projects Initiated The following DOE technical standards project was recently initi- ated. If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of this standard, please contact the persons listed below. • Definitions and Acronyms to Good Practices for Maintenance at DOE Nuclear Facilities, Project Number MNTY-0025; Charles B. Ramsey, EH-31; 301-903-5999, Chuck.Ramsey @hq.doe.gov. DOE Technical Standards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with cop- ies for comment. The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this docu-

91

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Residential Boilers Standards Residential Boilers Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is initiating the rulemaking and data collection process to consider amending the energy conservation standards for residential boilers. After concluding its initial review of the available information and public comments, DOE will publish either a notice of the determination that standards do not need to be amended, or a notice of proposed rulemaking including new proposed standards. 42 U.S.C. 6295(f)(4)(C) Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document regarding energy conservation standards for residential boilers. 78 FR 9631 (February 11, 2013).

92

January 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 12-27-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 22 Out for Comment - 26 Published in December - 4 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/

93

November 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 10-29-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 30 Published in October - 0 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/

94

February 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 01-28-2008 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 22 Out for Comment - 24 Published in January - 3 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for Reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/

95

Nuclear Safety Basis Program Review Overview and Management Oversight Standard Review Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This SRP, Nuclear Safety Basis Program Review, consists of five volumes. It provides information to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. It provides a primer on the safety basis development and documentation process used by the DOE. It also provides a set of LOIs for the review of safety basis programs and documents of nuclear facilities at various stages of the facility life cycle.

96

Microsoft Word - MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review 5-29-2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

111 Wilson Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703.558.0400 Fax: 703.558.0401 111 Wilson Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703.558.0400 Fax: 703.558.0401 http://www.manufacturedhousing.org info@mfghome.org U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program Mailstop EE-2J 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585-1585 May 29, 2012 Reference: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed as a part of its implementation of Executive Order

97

Standards Actions - August 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Standards Technical Standards Program Document Status (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) Activity Summary In Conversion – 4 In Preparation – 32 Out for Comment – 15 Published this Month – 1 5-year Reviews Revisions in Progress – 3 Reaffirmations in Progress – 0 Supersedures in Progress – 6 Cancellations Pending – 8 Cancellations in Progress – 2 No Current Action – 35 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of this standard, please contact the person listed below. Complete listings of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status are given in the Web Site referenced at the bottom of this page. To access these

98

April 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-27-2008 3-27-2008 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 26 Published in March - 0 Five Year Review status Proposed for Revision-4 Revision in Progress-3 Proposed for Reaffirmation-0 Reaffirmation in Progress-20 Cancellations Pending-6 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/ April 2008 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose

99

July 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6-27-2007 6-27-2007 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 27 Out for Comment - 24 Published in June - 0 5-year Review status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed forReaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellations Pending-9 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/ July 2007 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose

100

Standards Actions, May 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-29-2002 4-29-2002 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 47 Out for Comment - 12 Published this Month - 6 5-year Review Status Revision in Progress - 10 Reaffirmation in Progress - 12 Supersedure in Progress - 0 Cancellation Pending - 7 Cancellation in Progress - 1 No Current Action - 20 Inside this issue: DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Re- cently Published 1 American National Standards Institute 2 American Society for Testing and Materials International 4 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Standards Actions- May 2002 Standards Actions DOE Technical Standards Proposed for Reaffirmation The following documents are currently being reevaluated under the 5-year

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

May 2008 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-25-2008 4-25-2008 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 26 Published in April - 2 Five Year Review status Proposed for Revision-4 Revision in Progress-3 Proposed for Reaffirmation-0 Reaffirmation in Progress-20 Cancellations Pending-6 Cancellations in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclear safety/techstds/ May 2008 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://hss.energy.gov/nuclear safetytechstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose

102

Standards Actions - August 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Standards Technical Standards Program Document Status (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) (2000-07-31) Activity Summary In Conversion – 4 In Preparation – 32 Out for Comment – 15 Published this Month – 1 5-year Reviews Revisions in Progress – 3 Reaffirmations in Progress – 0 Supersedures in Progress – 6 Cancellations Pending – 8 Cancellations in Progress – 2 No Current Action – 35 Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE Technical Standards Project Initiated If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of this standard, please contact the person listed below. Complete listings of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status are given in the Web Site referenced at the bottom of this page. To access these

103

Standards for Promotion, Tenure, and Third-Year Review Department of Philosophy  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Standards for Promotion, Tenure, and Third-Year Review Department of Philosophy Texas A, to the research literature in philosophy. For most subfields of philosophy, the principal form of publication into account variations in type of publication in different subfields of philosophy. In some areas

Behmer, Spencer T.

104

Review of Central Exclusive Production of the Higgs Boson Beyond the Standard Model  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We review activities in the field of theoretical, phenomenological and experimental studies related to the production of the Higgs boson in central exclusive processes at LHC in models beyond Standard Model. Prospects in the context of the Higgs boson discovery at LHC in 2012 and of proposals to build forward proton detectors at ATLAS and CMS side are summarized.

Marek Tasevsky

2014-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

105

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011

106

Full Reviews: Reservoir Characterization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Below are the project presentations and respective peer reviewer comments for Reservoir Characterization.

107

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1959 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS E. S. PEARSON The Advanced...433 . 84s. [491 ] REVIEWS The Advanced Theory of...the same comprehensive standard, three volumes will...inserted in the original plan at this half-way stage......

E. S. PEARSON

1959-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review Reviews Reviews Factors for One-sided...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...Pp. 412 . 5.00. Reviews 293 Handbook of Nonparametric...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...expected value ft and standard deviation cr/^/n......

Reviews

1964-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

Notice of public meeting and additional opportunity for public review and comment for the WAPA Eastern Plains Transmission Project (DOE/EIS-0390)(06/04/07)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

792 Federal Register 792 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 106 / Monday, June 4, 2007 / Notices Training Activity Support System (STASS), Navy Personnel Command, Application for Tuition, the Marine Corps and Coast Guard personnel systems extracts, Assistance Form (NAVMC 10883), education counselors, educational institutions, Tuition Assistance Authorization Form (NAVEDTRA 1560/5), and Academic contractor. EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: None. [FR Doc. E7-10683 Filed 6-1-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Department of Education. SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork

110

Technical Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review for Technical Standards of Interest Legend: Red Technical Standards Program Activities and Responsibilities Blue Directives Program Activities and Responsibilities...

111

October 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Publication Staff Roster 2 Publication Staff Roster 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status 09-26-2006 Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 24 Out for Comment - 16 Published in September - 1 5-year Review Status Proposed for Revision-5 Revision in Progress-6 Proposed for reaffirmation-1 Reaffirmation in Progress-21 Cancellation Pending-9 Cancellation in Progress-0 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/ techstds/ October 2006 Standards Actions 1.0 DOE Standards Actions The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) web page at http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. To access

112

February 2001 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Technical Standards Program Document Status Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ Activity Summary In Conversion - 4 In Preparation - 35 Out for Comment - 18 Published this Month - 1 FY 2001 5-year Reviews Revisions in Progress - 2 Reaffirmations in Progress - 2 Supersedures in Progress - 6 Cancellations Pending - 11 Cancellations in Progress - 33 No Current Action - 16 DOE Technical Standards Project Canceled If you have any questions about this action, please contact the person listed be- low. The following DOE Technical Standards project was recently canceled: * EM Facility Hazard Categorization, Project Number SAFT-0029; EM Technical Standards Manager, John Serocki, 301-903-7999, John.Serocki@em.doe.gov, or Tom Wright, 301-903-3661, Tom.Wright@em.doe.gov. The need for this

113

Memo Issuance of EM Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MAR 2 4 201011 MAR 2 4 201011 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION FROM: DR. STEVEN L. KRAHN DEPUTY ASSISTANT SAFETY AND SECU EIVVIROIVMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Issuance of Environmental Management Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission critical projects/facilities. Effective management of these projects requires multiple disciplines to be integrated and engaged at various project lifecycle phases. These disciplines include project management, engineering, design, safety, environment, safeguards and security, and quality assurance. The lessons-learned to date from ongoing Headquarters (HQ) and Field project reviews [e.g., Construction Project

114

Retrospective review of Contura HDR breast cases to improve our standardized procedure  

SciTech Connect

To retrospectively review our first 20 Contura high dose rate breast cases to improve and refine our standardized procedure and checklists. We prepared in advance checklists for all steps, developed an in-house Excel spreadsheet for second checking the plan, and generated a procedure for efficient contouring and a set of optimization constraints to meet the dose volume histogram criteria. Templates were created in our treatment planning system for structures, isodose levels, optimization constraints, and plan report. This study reviews our first 20 high dose rate Contura breast treatment plans. We followed our standardized procedure for contouring, planning, and second checking. The established dose volume histogram criteria were successfully met for all plans. For the cases studied here, the balloon-skin and balloon-ribs distances ranged between 5 and 43 mm and 1 and 33 mm, respectively; air{sub s}eroma volume/PTV{sub E}val volume?5.5% (allowed?10%); asymmetry<1.2 mm (goal?2 mm); PTV{sub E}val V90%?97.6%; PTV{sub E}val V95%?94.9%; skin max dose?98%Rx; ribs max dose?137%Rx; V150%?29.8 cc; V200%?7.8 cc; the total dwell time range was 225.4 to 401.9 seconds; and the second check agreement was within 3%. Based on this analysis, more appropriate ranges for the total dwell time and balloon diameter tolerance were found. Three major problems were encountered: balloon migration toward the skin for small balloon-to-skin distances, lumen obstruction, and length change for the flexible balloon. Solutions were found for these issues and our standardized procedure and checklists were updated accordingly. Based on our review of these cases, the use of checklists resulted in consistent results, indicating good coverage for the target without sacrificing the critical structures. This review helped us to refine our standardized procedure and update our checklists.

Iftimia, Ileana, E-mail: Ileana.n.iftimia@lahey.org [Lahey Clinic, Radiation Oncology Department, MA (United States); Cirino, Eileen T.; Ladd, Ron; Mower, Herbert W.; McKee, Andrea B. [Lahey Clinic, Radiation Oncology Department, MA (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Volume 4: peer review comments on technical report  

SciTech Connect

This report compares the energy use, oil use and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) with those of conventional, gasoline-powered vehicles (CVs) over the total life cycle of the vehicles. The various stages included in the vehicles` life cycles include vehicle manufacture, fuel production, and vehicle operation. Disposal is not included. An inventory of the air emissions associated with each stage of the life cycle is estimated. Water pollutants and solid wastes are reported for individual processes, but no comprehensive inventory is developed. Volume IV includes copies of all the external peer review comments on the report distributed for review in July 1997.

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

DOE-STD-3006-95; DOE Standard Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3006-95 3006-95 November 1995 SUPERSEDING DOE-STD-3006-93 November 1993 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-3006-95 i PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) FOREWORD 1. DOE 0 425.1 establishes the requirement to conduct Operational Readiness Reviews

117

Technical comments on EPA`s proposed revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter  

SciTech Connect

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed new ambient air quality standards specifically for fine particulate matter, regulating concentrations of particles with median aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 {mu}m (PM{sub 2.5}). Two new standards have been proposed: a maximum 24-hr concentration that is intended to protect against acute health effects, and an annual concentration limit that is intended to protect against longer-term health effects. EPA has also proposed a slight relaxation of the 24-hr standard for inhalable particles (PM{sub 10}), by allowing additional exceedances each year. Fine particles are currently being indirectly controlled by means of regulations for PM{sub 10} and TSP, under the Clean Air Act of 1970 and subsequent amendments. Although routine monitoring of PM{sub 2.5} is rare and data are sparse, the available data indicate that ambient concentrations have been declining at about 6% per year under existing regulations.

Lipfert, F.W.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Comprehensive Summary and Analysis of Oral and Written Scoping Comments on the Hawaii Geothermal Project EIS (DOE Review Draft)  

SciTech Connect

This report contains summaries of the oral and written comments received during the scoping process for the Hawaii Geothermal Project (HGP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Oral comments were presented during public scoping meetings; written comments were solicited at the public scoping meetings and in the ''Advance Notice of Intent'' and ''Notice of Intent'' (published in the ''Federal Register'') to prepare the HGP EIS. This comprehensive summary of scoping inputs provides an overview of the issues that have been suggested for inclusion in the HGP EIS.

None

1992-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

119

DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Responsibilities - August Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 DOE-TSPP-7, Technical Standards Program Responsibilities - August 1, 2000 Technical Standards Program Procedures (TSPP) This procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. NOTE: Resolution of comments from Review Activities on draft or revised non-Government standards should be handled by the DOE representative to the standards-writing activity in accordance with this procedure. This procedure applies to all DOE Headquarters and field organizations, management and operating contractors, and laboratories (hereafter referred to collectively as DOEComponents") working to the latest revision of DOE Order 252.1, "Technical Standards Program."

120

Standard Review Plan for Environmental Restoration Program Quality Management Plans. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL) Manual Environmental Restoration Program Quality System Requirements (QSR) for the Hanford Site, defines all quality requirements governing Hanford Environmental Restoration (ER) Program activities. The QSR requires that ER Program participants develop Quality Management Plans (QMPs) that describe how the QSR requirements will be implemented for their assigned scopes of work. This standard review plan (SRP) describes the ER program participant responsibilities for submittal of QMPs to the RL Environmental Restoration Division for review and the RL methodology for performing the reviews of participant QMPS. The SRP serves the following functions: acts as a guide in the development or revision of QMPs to assure that the content is complete and adequate; acts as a checklist to be used by the RL staff in their review of participant QMPs; acts as an index or matrix between the requirements of the QSR and implementing methodologies described in the QMPs; decreases the time and subjectivity of document reviews; and provides a formal, documented method for describing exceptions, modifications, or waivers to established ER Program quality requirements.

Not Available

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Standard  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standard Standard rock For at least two generations, the depth of underground muon experiments has been reduced to depth in "standard rock." This is by definition the overburden of the Cayuga Rock Salt Mine near Ithaca, New York, where K. Greisen and collaborators made seminal observations of muons at substantial depths[1]. Ref. 1 says only "Most of the ground consists of shales of various types, with average density 2.65 g/cm 2 and average atomic number 11." Menon and Murthy later extended the definition: Z 2 /A = 5.5, Z/A = 0.5, and and ρ = 2.65 g/cm 2 [2]. It was thus not-quite-sodium. Lohmann[3] further assumed the mean excitation energy and density effect parameters were those of calcium carbonate, with no adjustments for the slight density difference. We use their definition for this most important material. (Extracted from D.E. Groom, N.V. Mokhov, and S.I. Striganov,

122

CERTS 2012 Program Review - Reliability Standards Analysis and Assessment - Gil Tam, EPG  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12-13, 2012 12-13, 2012 Washington, DC FY12 DOE/CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review Research Projects Reliability Standards Analysis and Assessments  Frequency Response Event Collection and Analysis  NERC Interconnections 2011 Annual Grid Reliability Performance Analysis and Report Page 1 Reliability Standards Analysis and Assessment  Objective: Support the NERC committees/groups (Resource Subcommittee and RS- Frequency Working Group) in the following ways: - Perform grid reliability metrics analysis using data collected in CERTS applications as requested by the RS - Analyze collected data to assess reliability performance at different levels - Interconnection, Reliability Coordinator, Balancing Authority - Perform analysis, testing, and monitoring of current and proposed

123

Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities, was developed by the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS)1, Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. This SRP (hereafter refers to as the Engineering SRP) provides consistent review guidance to assure that engineering and technical requirements are appropriately applied for the design, operations and disposition2 of DOE nuclear facilities. It is one of a series of three SRPs developed by the CNS. The other two SRPs address: 1) nuclear safety basis program review; and 2) application of requirements of DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and DOE-STD-1189, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, for DOE Critical Decision (CD) review and approval. These SRPs may be revised in the future to reflect changes in the DOE requirements, lessons learned, and experience/insights from nuclear facility design, operations, and disposition.

124

Full Reviews: Analysis and Education  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Below are the project presentations and respective peer reviewer comments for Analysis and Education.

125

Full Reviews: Seismicity and Seismic  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Below are the project presentations and respective peer reviewer comments for Seismicity and Seismic.

126

The following rubric is being used for the Assessment and Outcomes Committee's (AOC) comprehensive content review of departmental assessment plans and reports. Plans are divided into 5 major categories with comments and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

content review of departmental assessment plans and reports. Plans are divided into 5 major categories://www.montana.edu/wwwprov/assessment/assessmentplans.htm). The "Recommended Items" are elements that the reviewers believe would further improve many plans, and are already with comments and a grade for each category, and an overall grade for the plans. The elements listed

Maxwell, Bruce D.

127

The Standards Actions, August 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

standard project was recently can- standard project was recently can- celed. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the persons listed below. • Guidelines for Preparing Criti- cality Safety Evaluations at De- partment of Energy Non-Reac- tor Nuclear Facilities, Project Number SAFT-0069; Jerry McKamy, EH-34, 301-903-8031, Jerry. McKamy@hq.doe.gov. DOE Technical Stan- dards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with cop- ies for comment. The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. • Tritium Handling and Safe Storage, Project Number SAFT-0054;

128

The Standards Actions, February 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

standards project was recently can- standards project was recently can- celed. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the persons listed below. • Software Quality Assurance Requirements, Procedures, and Guidelines, Project QCIC-0008; Burton Rothleder, EH-31, 301- 903-3726, FAX 301-903-9523, Burton.Rothleder@hq.doe.gov. DOE Technical Stan- dards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with cop- ies for comment. The full text of these documents is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • DOE Handbook Design Considerations, Project Number EDCN-0001; Richard Stark, EH-31; 301-903-4407, FAX 301-

129

The Standards Actions May 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

these documents is available on these documents is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • Guidance for Nuclear Criticality Safety Engineer Training and Qualification, SAFT-0070, Jerry McKamy, EH-34, 301-903-8031, Jerry.McKamy@eh.doe.gov. Comments are due June 19, 1999. • Review Guide for Criticality Safety Evaluations, SAFT-0071, Jerry McKamy, EH-34, 301-903-8031, Jerry.McKamy @eh.doe.gov. Comments are due June 19, 1999. DOE Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: • DOE-STD-1090-99, Hoisting and Rigging (Formerly Hoisting and Rigging Manual), March 1999 (superseding DOE-STD-1090-96, September 1996). • DOE-STD-1111-98, The Department of Energy Laboratory Ac-

130

Quadrennial Energy Review comments  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

across western North Dakota. We are aggressively developing transmission for both oil and gas development and the associated residential and commercial growth. It should be...

131

Can Florida's Legislative Standard of Review for Small-Scale Land Use Amendments Be Justified?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to require the DCA to review the plan amendment if itstandard of review for all comprehensive plan amendments isstan- dard of review for a comprehensive plan amendment with

Appleman, Bernard R.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Customer Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Forum Energy Imbalance Market Meetings Customer Comments Generator Interconnection Reform Implementation Network Integration Transmission Service (NT Service) Network Open...

133

Customer Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Improvement (CBPI) Customer Forum Energy Imbalance Market Generator Interconnection Reform Implementation Meetings Customer Comments Network Integration Transmission Service (NT...

134

The Standards Action - April 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Projects Canceled Projects Canceled The following DOE technical standard project was recently can- celed. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the person listed below. • Seismic Design and Evaluation Guidelines for High-Level Waste Storage Tanks, 6910-0035; Owen Thompson, EM-38, 301- 903-1926, FAX 301-903-7604, Owen.Thompson@em.doe.gov. DOE Technical Stan- dards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with cop- ies for comment. The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. • Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-Bearing

135

E-Print Network 3.0 - analysis comment issue Sample Search Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

results for: analysis comment issue Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Public Participation in Energy Commission and BLM Process Phases are in bold, public review and comment...

136

Renewable Portfolio Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Portfolio Standard Renewable Portfolio Standard Renewable Portfolio Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Retail Supplier Savings Category Bioenergy Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Solar Home Weatherization Wind Program Info State Massachusetts Program Type Renewables Portfolio Standard Provider Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources NOTE: NOTE: In February 2013, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) issued proposed changes to its RPS Class I and RPS Solar Carve-Out programs. The DOER accepted comments through March 25, 2013. In addition, the DOER has developed a draft Assurance of Qualification Guideline and an emergency regulation to provide clarity to the queuing and review process as Solar Carve-Out cap is approached. All drafts, comments,

137

Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Retail Supplier Savings Category Commercial Heating & Cooling Manufacturing Buying & Making Electricity Bioenergy Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Water Wind Solar Program Info State Ohio Program Type Renewables Portfolio Standard Provider Ohio Public Utilities Commission '''''Note: Legislation passed in 2012 (S.B. 289 and S.B. 315) added certain new technologies to the list of eligible Renewable Energy Resources and Advanced Energy Resources. In July 2012, The PUCO opened [http://dis.puc.state.oh.us/CaseRecord.aspx?CaseNo=12-2156 Docket 12-2156-EL-ORD] in order to implement the changes. PUCO is accepting comments on the proposed rules, and comments reviewing OAC 4901:1-10, until

138

Comments to the review "Nonthermal phenomena in clusters of galaxies" by Y.Rephaeli et al. that will appear on the book: Clusters of galaxies: beyond the thermal view  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Comments to the review "Nonthermal Phenomena in Clusters of Galaxies" by Y.Rephaeli et al. (arXiv:0801.0982 [astro-ph]) that regard the presence of a hard X-ray excess in the Coma cluster, A2199, A2163 and the Bullet cluster.

Roberto Fusco-Femiano; Mauro Orlandini

2008-02-13T23:59:59.000Z

139

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

SciTech Connect

More than half of U.S. states have renewable portfolio standards (RPS) in place and have collectively deployed approximately 46,000 MW of new renewable energy capacity through year-end 2012. Most of these policies have five or more years of implementation experience, enabling an assessment of their costs and benefits. Understanding RPS benefits and costs is essential for policymakers evaluating existing RPS policies, assessing the need for modifications, and considering new policies. A key aspect of this study is the comprehensive review of existing RPS cost and benefit estimates, in addition to an examination of the variety of methods used to calculate such estimates. Based on available data and estimates reported by utilities and regulators, this study summarizes RPS costs to date. The study considers how those costs may evolve going forward, given scheduled increases in RPS targets and cost containment mechanisms incorporated into existing policies. The report also summarizes RPS benefits estimates, based on published studies for individual states, and discusses key methodological considerations.

Heeter, Jenny; Barbose, Galen; Bird, Lori; Weaver, Samantha; Flores, Francisco; Kuskova-Burns, Ksenia; Wiser, Ryan

2014-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

140

2014-11-25 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Small, Large, and Very Large Air-cooled Commercial Package Air Conditioning and Heating Equipment; Extension of Public Comment Period  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document is a pre-publication Federal Register extension of the public comment period regarding energy conservation standards for small, large and very large air-cool commercial package air conditioning and heating equipment, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on November 25, 2014. Though it is not intended or expected, should any discrepancy occur between the document posted here and the document published in the Federal Register, the Federal Register publication controls. This document is being made available through the Internet solely as a means to facilitate the public's access to this document.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Government Benefits and the Rule of Law: Toward a Standards-Based Theory of Judicial Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This is the second of two articles developing a standards-based approach to the rule of law in the context of administrative decisions concerning government benefits. We base our standards-based theory on two core ...

Levy, Richard E.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

web_comments.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rec Type Rec Type Recommendations/ Comments Name Organization 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Future reliability standards must strike a balance between detailed, rigid requirements, which provide little or no latitude for deviation, and standards, which are objective-based and allow for innovation and invention to achieve intended goals. Each standard should identify its importance on the BPS reliability in terms of the potential short-term (operating time horizon) vs. long-term (planning time horizon) impacts of non-compliance. Ajay Garg, Mike Penstone Hydro One Networks Inc. 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Core Reliability Standards: comprising a small number of technical standards designed to enable the BPS to withstand and recover from unexpected contingencies. Core Reliability

143

Review of Consensus Standard Spectra for Flat Plate and Concentrating Photovoltaic Performance  

SciTech Connect

Consensus standard reference terrestrial solar spectra are used to establish nameplate ratings for photovoltaic device performance at standard reporting conditions. This report describes reference solar spectra developed in the United States and international consensus standards community which are widely accepted as of this writing (June 2011).

Myers, D.

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-7 Comment Resolution Revision: 4 Date: August 1, 2000 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability.............................................................................................................. 1 2. COMMENT RESOLUTION ............................................................................................................ 1

145

Resolving Code and Standard Barriers to Building America Innovations- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presenter: Pam Cole, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory This project is developing processes and resources for a Codes and Standards Innovation (CSI) team to assist research partners and industry in overcoming codes and standards barriers to high-performance innovations. The goal of this project is to speed the market adoption of residential high-performance innovations and technologies facing code and standard barriers by utilizing tools and resources developed by CSI and others to address these barriers. The Building America program supports codes and standards by identifying and filling gaps in building science and system knowledge that may limit effective implementation of new and existing standards.

146

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement John Cymbalsky, Ashley Armstrong, and Laura Barhydt US Department of Energy January 31, 2011 Presentation Outline Presentation Outline * Upcoming Relevant Rulemakings * Changes to Rulemaking Process * Executive Order 13563 * Overview of Compliance, Certification, and Enforcement * Detailed Questions and Answers 2 | U.S. Department of Energy energy.gov Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Appliance Standards Product Categories Driver Approx. Rule Initiation Date Final Action Date Heating Products Rulemakings Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool

147

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Buildings Regulatory Program Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement John Cymbalsky, Ashley Armstrong, and Laura Barhydt US Department of Energy January 31, 2011 Presentation Outline Presentation Outline * Upcoming Relevant Rulemakings * Changes to Rulemaking Process * Executive Order 13563 * Overview of Compliance, Certification, and Enforcement * Detailed Questions and Answers 2 | U.S. Department of Energy energy.gov Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Long Term Schedules for Certain HVAC Rulemakings Appliance Standards Product Categories Driver Approx. Rule Initiation Date Final Action Date Heating Products Rulemakings Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool

148

The Costs and Benefits of Compliance with Renewable Portfolio Standards: Reviewing Experience to Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

M. (2007). Can deployment of renewable energy put downwardXcel Energy. (2011). Renewable Energy Standard Rate Impact2010. Alpena. (2012). Renewable Energy Annual Report for

Heeter, Jenny

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

International Review of Frameworks for Impact Evaluation of Appliance Standards, Labeling, and Incentives  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Evaluation, Measurement and Verification Approaches Usedan Update of BPAs Measurement and Verification Protocols. Evaluation, Measurement and Verification (EM&V) Standard:

Zhou, Nan

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

Public comments on the proposed 10 CFR Part 51 rule for renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses and supporting documents: Review of concerns and NRC staff response. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff review of public comments provided in response to the NRC`s proposed amendments to 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 51, which establish new requirements for the environmental review of applications for the renewal of operating licenses of nuclear power plants. The public comments include those submitted in writing, as well as those provided at public meetings that were held with other Federal agencies, State agencies, nuclear industry representatives, public interest groups, and the general public. This report also contains the NRC staff response to the various concerns raised, and highlights the changes made to the final rule and the supporting documents in response to these concerns.

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

151

2012 SG Peer Review - Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing - Tom Basso, NREL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing Smart Grid Standards and Conformance Testing Tom Basso, NREL (June 7, 2012) December 2008 Smart Grid Standards and Testing Objective Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) FY11, authorized FY12, authorized FY13, requested Out-year(s) (FY 14-FY15) 1,000 1,100 1,100 2,300 Technical Scope (Insert graphic here) Support the evolution of the electric power system infrastructure to an interoperable system that modernizes the grid, enhances its security and reliability, facilitates recovery from disruptions, provides for customer participation and choice in load management. National and international standards and best practices, and, conformance testing for: two-way communications and power flow; operating practices; interconnection, integration, and interoperability of power,

152

Preliminary standard review guide for Environmental Restoration/Decontamination and Decommissioning safety analyses  

SciTech Connect

The review guide is based on the shared experiences, approaches, and philosophies of the Environmental Restoration/Decontamination and Decommissioning (ER/D&D) subgroup members. It is presented in the form of a review guide to maximize the benefit to both the safety analyses practitioner and reviewer. The guide focuses on those challenges that tend to be unique to ER/D&D cleanup activities. Some of these experiences, approaches, and philosophies may find application or be beneficial to a broader spectrum of activities such as terminal cleanout or even new operations. Challenges unique to ER/D&D activities include (1) consent agreements requiring activity startup on designated dates; (2) the increased uncertainty of specific hazards; and (3) the highly variable activities covered under the broad category of ER/D&D. These unique challenges are in addition to the challenges encountered in all activities; e.g., new and changing requirements and multiple interpretations. The experiences in approaches, methods, and solutions to the challenges are documented from the practitioner and reviewer`s perspective, thereby providing the viewpoints on why a direction was taken and the concerns expressed. Site cleanup consent agreements with predetermined dates for restoration activity startup add the dimension of imposed punitive actions for failure to meet the date. Approval of the safety analysis is a prerequisite to startup. Actions that increase expediency are (1) assuring activity safety; (2) documenting that assurance; and (3) acquiring the necessary approvals. These actions increase the timeliness of startup and decrease the potential for punitive action. Improvement in expediency has been achieved by using safety analysis techniques to provide input to the line management decision process rather than as a review of line management decisions. Expediency is also improved by sharing the safety input and resultant decisions with reviewers and regulators.

Ellingson, D.R.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

153

COMMENTS OF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Coordination of Federal ) Authorizations for Electric ) 10 CFR Part 900 Transmission Facilities ) (RIN 1901-AB18) COMMENTS OF THE STAFF OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE INTERIM FINAL RULE INTRODUCTION The Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California ("CPUC") hereby provides its comments pursuant to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Interim Final Rule on Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities, which was published in the Federal Register on Friday, September 19, 2008. The CPUC is a constitutionally established agency charged with the responsibility for regulating electric corporations within the State of California. In

154

DOE-STD-1082-94; DOE Standard Preparation, Review, and Approval of Implementaiton Plans For Nuclear Safety Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

82-94 82-94 October 1994 DOE STANDARD PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615)576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95001461 DOE-STD-1082-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard has been prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of Steve

155

DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is now interested in receiving comment on the suggestions and comments received from outside parties. Those comments and suggestions are posted on the Office of the General Counsel website: Retrospective Review of Regulations. On January 31, 2011, the Department took two steps to launch its

156

Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of the Natural Resource...

157

Comments on reducing regulatory burden | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces, and accessories Comments on reducing regulatory burden More...

158

Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of...

159

Microsoft Word - S07803_Comments  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

LMS/MNT/S07803 LMS/MNT/S07803 DOE Responses to April 13, 2011 BTAG Technical Review Comments on Monticello Mill Tailings Site, Operable Unit III, Biomonitoring Program Status and Analytical Update, March 2011 May 2011 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy DOE Responses to BTAG Technical Review Comments May 2011 Doc. No. S07803 Page 1 Preface The following documents the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Legacy Management (LM) responses to joint comments received from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) on the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS) Operable Unit (OU) III Biomonitoring Program Status and Analytical Update, March 2011. EPA, UDEQ, and FWS

160

DOE Standards Actions, November 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Projects Canceled DOE Projects Canceled The following DOE Technical Standards project was recently can- celed. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the person listed below. • Worker Protection for Uranium Facilities, Project Number SAFT-0058; Peter O’Connell, EH-52; 301-903-5641, Peter .O’Connell@eh.doe.gov. This project was superceded by Guide of Good Practices for Oc- cupational Radiological Protec- tion in Uranium Facilities, Project Number SAFT-0072. DOE Technical Stan- dards Recently Sent for Coordination The appropriate Technical Stan- dards Managers (TSMs) will pro- vide selected reviewers with copies for comment. The full text of these documents are available on the Technical Standards Pro- gram (TSP) Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Reviewer Instructions:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reviewer Instructions: Reviewer Instructions: 1. All review comments to be provided electronically using this review form. 2. Focus the review on substantive issues within your disciplinary, regulatory, or policy area. 3. Look only at the portions relevant to your agency and the land under your management. The individual land management agencies will be amending land use plans or issuing a Record of Decision, so please don't alter the other agencies' roles and responsibilities. 4. Target the review on the adequacy and reasonableness of text and analyses within your disciplinary, regulatory, or policy area. Please be aware that this is a programmatic EIS. 5. All comments should be as specific as possible. Comments such as "text unclear" or "expand" do not provide sufficient

162

Earthjustice, Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Natural...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Council - Comments in response to DOE solicitation of views on the implementation of test procedure waivers for large capacity clothes washers Earthjustice, Appliance Standards...

163

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ceiling Fans Energy Conservation Standards Ceiling Fans Energy Conservation Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering establishing energy conservation standards for residential ceiling fans. There are currently federal design standards and test procedures for ceiling fans, but no energy conservation standards. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a request for information regarding energy conservation standards for ceiling fans. 78 FR 62494 (October 22, 2013). Public Meeting Information No public meeting is scheduled at this time. Submitting Public Comments

164

Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Review Scoping Document and Process...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

please let BPA know in your submitted comments. I. Overview and Timeline The "Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Review" (Review) is a public process to review and consider...

165

Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Draft WVDP Vitrification Melter WIR Evaluation Comments on Draft WVDP Vitrification Melter WIR Evaluation 1 To provide greater transparency to the Department of Energy's (DOE) cleanup of nuclear legacy waste, DOE made the "West Valley Demonstration Project Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the Vitrification Melter" (Draft WIR Evaluation) available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. The public comments on the Draft WIR Evaluation were submitted to DOE by one individual and two organizations:  Raymond C. Vaughan, PhD.,  The West Valley Citizen Task Force, and  The Coalition on West Valley Nuclear Wastes.

166

Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Now Available for Public Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy has issued a Notice of Public Comment in the Federal Register, inviting the public to comment on the draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. The draft study is now available for review and downloading at http://www.energy.gov/node/942311. The public comment period will close on October 20, 2014. After reviewing and considering comments on the draft study, the Department will prepare and release a final version of the study.

167

Book Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Copyright 2003 Book Review Book Review Book Review Frank Land 1 1 Emeritus...Economics, UK 526 BOOK REVIEWS discusses some basic concepts...the programming language Standard ML: CML (Concurrrent ML), Facile and PLAN (Packet Language for Active......

Frank Land

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

Notice of Public Meetings and Additional Opportunity for Public Review and Comment for the Eastern Plains Transmission Project (DOE/EIS-0390) (01/19/07)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Federal Register 7 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices accepting Initial Tariff, Waiving Regulations and Granting Blanket Approvals. Filed Date: 01/05/2007. Accession Number: 20070108-0252. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 26, 2007. Docket Numbers: ER07-413-000. Applicants: Tampa Electric Company. Description: Tampa Electric Co submits Second Revised Sheet No. 6 to FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 6, to be effective 1/2/07. Filed Date: 01/05/2007. Accession Number: 20070108-0253. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 26, 2007. Docket Numbers: ER07-414-000. Applicants: Caledonia Power I, L.L.C. Description: Caledonia Power I, LLC submits notice of cancellation of its market-based rate tariff, FERC Electric

169

The EIS Comment-Response Process | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS. The EIS Comment-Response Process More Documents & Publications EIS Distribution Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada - Nevada Rail Transportation CorridorDOE/EIS-0250F-S2andFinal Envir

170

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

171

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. This notice announces an extension of the public comment period for submitting comments regarding the IIP Process to October 31, 2013. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

172

Page comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

home/ home/ http://www.nersc.gov/users/computational-systems/hopper/updates-and-status/open-issues/resolved-error-message-modulecmd-switch-c-172-error-152-module-prgenv-cray-is-currently-not-loaded/#PageComment_97 > module list 2>&1 | grep Prg 32) PrgEnv-gnu/4.1.40 I ignore the error but It's a bit uncomfortable that the error takes screen the space here are my loaded modules: > module list Currently Loaded Modulefiles: 1) modules/3.2.6.6 2) xtpe-network-gemini 3) darshan/2.2.6 4) atp/1.6.2 5) switch/1.0-1.0401.36779.2.72.gem 6) shared-root/1.0-1.0401.37253.3.50.gem 7) pdsh/2.26-1.0401.37449.1.1.gem 8) nodehealth/5.0-1.0401.38460.12.18.gem 9) lbcd/2.1-1.0401.35360.1.2.gem 10) hosts/1.0-1.0401.35364.1.115.gem 11) configuration/1.0-1.0401.35391.1.2.gem 12) ccm/2.2.0-1.0401.37254.2.142 13)

173

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS 402 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Safety, Codes and Standards Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Safety, Codes and Standards Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Safety, Codes and Standards Program: The Safety, Codes and Standards program supports research and development (R&D) that provides the critical information needed to define requirements and close gaps in safety, codes, and standards to enable the safe use and handling of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The program also conducts safety activities focused on promoting safety practices among U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) projects and the development of information resources and best practices. Reviewers recognized that the program continues to provide strong support in the following

174

Tribal Comments Database  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Summary of all comments from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtables held between March 16 and April 14, 2011.

175

Public Comments on the proposed 10 CFR Part 51 rule for renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses and supporting documents: Review of concerns and NRC staff response. Appendices  

SciTech Connect

This volume contains several appendices. Appendix A contains the list of individuals and organizations providing comments at various stages of the rulemaking process. The names of commenters at the public meetings are listed in the order that they spoke at the meeting; those who submitted written comments are listed by docket number. Appendix B contains the summaries of comments made. Each comment summary is identified by a unique comment number. Appendix C presents the concerns and NRC staff responses. Each concern embodies one or more comments on similar or related issues. The associated comment numbers are referenced for each concern. The concerns are organized by topic areas. A three-letter identifier for the topic, followed by a number, is assigned to each concern.

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

Private Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | A 74BPrivate Citizen/Individual's Written Comments Private Citizens/Individuals Written Comments | 1 While anecdotal suggestions of health effects from wind turbine sound can be found online, No evidence exists regarding direct negative health effects associated with wind turbine sound in any peer reviewed, scientific papers or studies. Impacts to birds and bats are disclosed in Section 4.4.5.11-Migratory Birds - Direct and Indirect Effects by Alternative and 4.4.5.8-Bats - Direct and Indirect Effects by Alternative, respectively. Impacts to Birds and Bats will be minimized by MM-BIO-5 Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy. Additionally, refer to Appendix B-4: Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy (formerly known as the Avian and Bat

177

Scholastic Standards Scholastic Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Scholastic Standards _______________ 1.8 Page 1 Scholastic Standards Center for Advising-7095 Gaye DiGregorio, Executive Director Scholastic standards are mandated by the faculty through the Faculty Council Committee on Scholastic Standards. Procedures relative to scholastic standards

178

Guidelines for preparing and reviewing applications for the licensing of non-power reactors: Standard review plan and acceptance criteria. NUREG - 1537, Part 2  

SciTech Connect

NUREG - 1537, Part 2 gives guidance on the conduct of licensing action reviews to NRC staff who review non-power reactor licensing applications. These licensing actions include construction permits and initial operating licenses, license renewals, amendments, conversions from highly enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium, decommissioning, and license termination.

NONE

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

Polarimetric Standardization  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The use of polarimetric techniques is nowadays widespread among solar and stellar astronomers. However, notwithstanding the recommandations that have often been made about the publication of polarimetric results in the astronomical literature, we are still far from having a standard protocol on which to conform. In this paper we review the basic definitions and the physical significance of the Stokes parameters, and we propose a standardization of the measurement of polarized radiation.

E. Landi Degl'Innocenti; S. Bagnulo; L. Fossati

2006-10-09T23:59:59.000Z

180

Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation submits the following comments to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in hopes that their contribution can highlight and further the understanding of the DOE on the key role that integrated communications will play ineneabling utilities to deploy cost-effective long-term smart grid benefits. Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation More Documents & Publications Comments of Tendril Networks Inc Technical Standards Newsletter - September 2001

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). AHAM CommentsDOE Reg Review Sept 2012FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg....

182

The Standards Actions, January 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Actions Actions Resistance of HVAC Air Ducts and Fittings (new standard); comments due February 6, 1996. * ISO/ASQC A3534-1, Statis- tics - Vocabulary and Sym- bols - Probability and Gen- eral Statistical Terms (new standard); comments due January 26, 1996. * ISO/ASTM/ASQC/NSF 14004, Environmental management systems - General guidelines on principles, systems and Technical Standards Program Document Status as of 12/31/95 Documents Recently Published The Technical Standards Program is sponsoring a project at OSTI to place all DOE technical standards (i.e., standards and handbooks) on the Internet. To date, 57 DOE technical standards have been placed on the Internet at the following address: http://apollo.osti.gov/ html/techstds/ techstds.html The following DOE technical standards have recently

183

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......of organizing computations (though he does not discuss the product form of the inverse...theory. It reads with the drynesa of a handbook. This does not detract from Reviews 479 ita value; as a handbook it is excellent and the reviewer has no......

J. G. SAW

1961-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Conservation Standards Energy Conservation Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering developing energy conservation standards for residential furnace fans. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding energy conservation standards for residential furnace fans. 78 FR 64067 (October 25, 2013). DOE also published a notice of extension of the public comment period, extending the original comment deadline from December 24, 2013 to January 23, 2014. 78 FR 77607 (December 24, 2013).

185

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Publications Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports These reports summarize the comments of expert peer...

186

August 1999 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

this document is available on the this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. * Design Criteria Standard for Electronic Records Manage- ment Software, Project Number INFT-0001; Carol Blackston, MA-42; 301-903-4294, FAX 301- 903-4101; Carol.Blackston @hq.doe.gov. Comments are due August 30, 1999. This stan- dard was adapted from the De- partment of Defense standard 5015.2 and tailored for specific DOE use. DOE Documents Recently Published The following DOE document has recently been published: * DOE-HDBK-3027-99, Integrated Safety Management Systems (ISMS) Verification - Team Leader's Handbook, June 1999. DOE employees and DOE contractors may obtain copies from the

187

REVIEW:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Computers Reviewers, 2011 Stefan Agamanolis, United Kingdom Rosa Alarcon, Chile Frances Aldrich, United Kingdom Jason Alexander, United Kingdom Norman Alm, United Kingdom Analia Amandi, Argentina Chee Siang Ang, United Kingdom Alissa Antle......

Reviewers; Editors Appreciation 2011

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments, 1/18/11 Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments, 1/18/11 This Standard provides guidance and criteria for a standard approach to utlilization of probabilistic risk assessments in nuclear safety applications. This interim Standard was developed by a team of experts from the DOE Program Secretarial Offices and private industry. It has been reviewed by the DOE Risk Assessment Technical Experts Working Group and recommended by the working group to be issued for interim use and comment in order to allow DOE to take advantage of the insights it provides for control og risk assessments while it is being finalized and improved based

189

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review BOOK REVIEWS Book Reviews R. W. K. Odoni FIELD...Springer, 1986) 174 BOOK REVIEWS article, or more accurately...title from them. The plan is to study, for a suitably...theory, ultrafilters BOOK REVIEWS 175 and ultraproducts...procedures and non-standard structures such as higher......

R. W. K. Odoni

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

190

Interested Parties- WAPA Public Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Comments Received in Response to Western Area Power Administration's Federal Register Notice Titled 'Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments.'

191

DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 - Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 Updated 4/9/2012 DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE received comments on the draft DOE Challenge Home specifications and requirements from December 15, 2011 through January 31, 2012. This document summarizes the comments received, DOE's responses, and the resulting policy change, if any. All comments were reviewed. Similar comments were grouped together in the responses. Editorial comments and general observations were considered, but are not listed in the responses below unless they involved a significant clarification to the DOE Challenge Home provisions. DOE is not responsible for any typographical errors or omissions.

192

Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS May 28, 2013 - 5:37pm Addthis Public Comment Period Re-Opened for the Uranium Leasing Program PEIS The U.S. Department of Energy is re-opening the public comment period for the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft ULP PEIS, DOE/EIS-0472D). DOE made the Draft ULP PEIS available for public comment on March 15, 2013 (78 FR 16500). The public comment period for the Draft ULP PEIS originally was to end on May 16, 2013, and an extension to May 31, 2013 was announced on April 23, 2013 (78 FR 23926). In response to a public request for additional review time, DOE re-opens the public comment period, which will now close on July 1,

193

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Publication 9285.7-01D Publication 9285.7-01D January 1998 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments) Interim Office of Emergency and Remedial Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Revision No. 0 ii January 1998 NOTICE This document provides guidance to EPA staff. The guidance is designed to communicate National policy on the planning, reporting and review of Superfund risk assessments. The document does not, however, substitute for EPA's statutes or regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it cannot impose legally-binding requirements on EPA, States, or the regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based upon

194

Enclosure 3 Independent External Peer Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Enclosure 3 Summary of Independent External Peer Review Final Panel Comments November 5, 2010 #12 5, 2010 Summary of Independent External Peer Review Final Panel Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Type I independent external peer reviews (IEPRs) assess the economic, engineering, and environmental aspects

US Army Corps of Engineers

195

Standard Energy Efficiency Data (SEED) Platform - 2014 BTO Peer...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Standard Energy Efficiency Data (SEED) Platform - 2014 BTO Peer Review Standard Energy Efficiency Data (SEED) Platform - 2014 BTO Peer Review Project Objective The Standard Energy...

196

The Response of the Auto Industry and Consumers to Changes in the Exhaust Emission and Fuel Economy Standards (1975-2003): A Historical Review of Changes in Technology, Prices and Sales of Various Classes of Vehicles  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

income, inflation, and fuel prices over the same timeHistorical review of the effect of fuel prices and macro-because of the high fuel prices. When the CAFE standards

Burke, Andy; Abeles, Ethan; Chen, Belinda

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

197

The Standards Actions, November 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The full text of The full text of this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. • Fire Protection Design Criteria, Project Number FIRP-0001 (re- vision of DOE-STD-1066-97), Dennis Kubicki, EH-51, 301- 903-4794, FAX 301-903-2239; Dennis.Kubicki@eh.doe.gov; comments due December 18, 1998. • Hoisting and Rigging, Project Number SAFT-0068, (revision to DOE-STD-1090-96), Pat Finn, EH-51, 301-903-9876, FAX 301-903-2239, Pat.Finn@eh.doc.gov; comments due December 4, 1998. DOE Technical Standards Recently Published The following DOE Technical Standard has recently been published: • DOE-STD-3007-93, Guidelines for Preparing Criticality Safety Evaluations at Department of Energy Non-Reactor Nuclear Fa-

198

Comment response document for the Secretary of Energy`s ``Report to Congress on Reassessment of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program``  

SciTech Connect

On November 29, 1989, the Secretary of Energy published his ``Report to Congress on the Reassessment of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program`` (Report), and sent copies to numerous interested parties for their review and comment. This document summarizes comments received on the Report and presents the DOE`s current responses to those comments as a basis for further discussions. Included as appendixes are a list of commenters, a crosswalk showing where each comment is addressed, the comment letters themselves with specific comments delineated, and the DOE`s response to those letters. Twenty-five individuals or organizations submitted comments on the Report. The DOE identified 130 individual comments and classified them into the following seven categories: Management, Institutional, Regulatory, Transportation, Monitored Retrievable Storage, Scheduling, and Yucca Mountain. For the responses, comments were than grouped into more specific topics under each of the major headings. The DOE attempted to respond to all comments.

NONE

1990-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

90915DOE 2010 Plan Comments.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 A B C D E F G H 9/15/2009 DOE URTAC: 2010 DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN COMMENTS (with assigned topic areas) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (& POLICY) TECHNOLO GY TRANSFER 2007, 2008, 2009 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMEN T METRICS & BENEFITS ASSESSMEN T 2010 PROGRAM Environment al and Prior Recommend ation Review ADMIN & EDITORIAL COMMENTS 2007 X X X 2008 X X 2009 X X X 2010 X X X X X X COMMENTS FROM DON SPARKS: The following areas are of importance: Unconventional Resource X 1. Resource Assessment X a. Resource assessment (p. 28) X b. Geosciences (p. 28) X c. Basin Analysis & Resource Exploitation (p. 29) X 2. Early Stage Research or novel concepts.... (p. 30) X 3. Develop and execute innovative approaches .......(p. 30) X Drilling/completion/water management

200

DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures, 2009, DOE-TSPP-7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance Washington, D.C. 20585 DOE-TSPP-7 Comment Resolution Revision: 5 Date: July 1, 2009 DOE Technical Standards Program i CONTENTS Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Applicability ............................................................................................................... 1 2. COMMENT RESOLUTION........................................................................................................... 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

OSTIblog Recent comments  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

comments/rss en Good to know comments/rss en Good to know http://www.osti.gov/home/ostiblog/mixing-sciencegov-coffee-and-laptop#comment-1222 I didn't know that kind of information is available on science.gov! This would be really helpful for my Dad who is now in his 70s and is always prescribed different drugs for common aging ailments. Thanks, Cathey! Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:20:57 +0000 comment 1222 at http://www.osti.gov/home The Manhattan Project -- Its Immediate Influences http://www.osti.gov/home/ostiblog/manhattan-project-its-immediate-influences#comment-1136 "The Manhattan Project -- Its Immediate Influences" and the Wikipedia article about the Manhattan Project do have something very specific in common. Please note that one of the Wikipedia 'References', under 'General,

202

REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......documentation, improvement and evaluation. Also discussed are the relative merits of alignment to the standard as opposed to achieving full certification...frustrating if these issues had been dealt with before publishing. Nick Dunn 8/10 9/10 7/10...

Project Management for IT-related Projects (Second Edition) ? M & A Integration: How to do it ? Pegasus: The Seminal Early Computer ? The Computer Incident Response Planning Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information at Risk ? Interop The Promise; Perils of Highly Interconnected Systems ? Business continuity management systems

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Berkeley Lab Research Review Magazine Index  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Research Review Magazine A-Z Index Search Phone Book Comments Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Public Information Department News Archive Listing by Subject...

204

Quadrennial Energy Review Stakeholder Meeting #11: Cheyenne,...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Presentations and Comments At the Quadrennial Energy Review Stakeholder Meeting 11: Cheyenne, WY Infrastructure Siting August 21, 2014 Opening Remarks Dr. Karen Wayland, Deputy...

205

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......236 BOOK REVIEWS standard results like the adjoint...concerned with con- BOOK REVIEWS 237 struction methods...groups, is needed. A review of the main concepts...are a knowledge of the standard results of linear algebra...contents and the general plan of the work may be gathered......

J. Cofman

1974-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Classroom Evaluation of a Scaffolding Intervention for Improving Peer Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Classroom Evaluation of a Scaffolding Intervention for Improving Peer Review Localization Huy, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Abstract. A peer review system that automatically evaluates student feedback comments first drafts were both reviewed by peers. During peer review, the system automatically analyzed

Litman, Diane J.

207

Setting effective mandatory energy efficiency standards and labelling regulations: A review of best practices in the Asia Pacific region  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract This paper attempts to inform policy makers and legislators on how to set energy efficiency standards and labelling (S&L) regulations. It draws lessons from the literature on S&L regulations in the AsiaPacific region and from practical experience in drafting the S&L regulations for Brunei Darussalam. The paper proposes necessary components for effective S&L regulations, as follows: clear liabilities, authoritative administration, open principles for technical systems, and enforceable mechanisms. It also recommends some key issues in good practice toward effective S&L regulations, such as policy making in advance, customised legislation, inclusive and transparent legislative procedure, and flexibility in the legislation.

Xunpeng Shi

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Join a Regional Stakeholder Quadrennial Energy Review Meeting Near You  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Please consider participating in an upcoming meeting and or submitting your entity's priorities and comments in to the record at public comment at an upcoming Quadrennial Energy Review (QER)...

209

Microsoft Word - AppendixH_CommentResponse.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

NFSS Vicinity Property Report NFSS Vicinity Property Report October 2010 Doc. No. S06246 Page H-1 Responsiveness Summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties, New York: Review of Radiological Conditions at Six Vicinity Properties and Two Drainage Ditches on April 23, 2010, for public comment. Report availability was announced through a message to stakeholders sent on behalf of DOE by USACE. The announcement provided a 30-day comment period, closing on March 19, 2010. DOE extended the comment period to June 14, 2010, in response to multiple requests for additional time to review FUSRAP documentation. Twenty comments were received, of which five were from one stakeholder and two from

210

Past DOE Technical Standards Program Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review past procedures used to write, revise, or maintain a Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard.

211

DOE Hydrogen Transition Analysis Workshop Discussion Comments...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Workshop Discussion Comments, Questions, and Action Items DOE Hydrogen Transition Analysis Workshop Discussion Comments, Questions, and Action Items Discussion comments, questions,...

212

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Comment on Application (Optional) Comment on Application (Optional) < GRR‎ | Elements Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections 14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) The DOGGR Regional Board receives the option to comment on the application prior to the issuance of a Draft Project Approval Letter for review. The DOGGR Regional Board shall furnish any comments to the DOGGR State Board within 14 days of the applicant submitting the application. Logic Chain No Parents \V/ GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6 - Comment on Application (Optional) (this page) \V/ No Dependents Under Development Add.png Add an Element Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=GRR/Elements/14-CA-c.6_-_Comment_on_Application_(Optional)&oldid=539608

214

Appendix C - Comments and Responses  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

C C COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This appendix contains the comments that were received during the 30-day public comment period on the draft EA (March 22 through April 22, 2002) and their responses. Comments were obtained during the public meeting held in Carlsbad, New Mexico, on April 16, 2002, as well as from letters and electronic mail messages. The comment entries are organized according to comment categories. In compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and Council on Environmental Quality regulations, public comments on the draft EA were assessed individually and collectively. Some comments resulted in changes or modifications that have been incorporated into the final EA. Comments not requiring modifications to the EA resulted in a response to correct the

215

May 2009 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2009 May 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

216

February 2009 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 2009 February 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

217

July 2009 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

218

May 2010 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Technical Standards Program (http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/) Standards Actions 1.0 DOE STANDARDS ACTIONS The Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards Program (TSP) publishes Standards Actions on a monthly basis to provide DOE headquarters and field elements with current information on DOE and select non-government standards activities. The complete list of all DOE Technical Standards projects and their status is available on the TSP web page at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/. To access these standards, go to our web page, click on "DOE Technical Standards," then choose Projects, Approved Standards, Recently Approved Standards, or Drafts for Review, as

219

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (''CSC'') including its obligation to contribute to an international supplementary fund in the event of certain nuclear incidents.The NOI provided a September 27, 2010, deadline for comments, which was subsequently extended to October 27, 2010 in response to a public

220

Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

extension of public comment period for reply comments. extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (''CSC'') including its obligation to contribute to an international supplementary fund in the event of certain nuclear incidents.The NOI provided a September 27, 2010, deadline for comments, which was subsequently extended to October 27, 2010 in response to a public

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Got Standards? "Got Standards?"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

certifications available. Some of these certifications include ISO 9002 1994, ISO 9003 1994 and ISO 9001 in order to bring harmony to global standards for international trade. Enter ISO 9000. The Basics In order to fully understand the concept of ISO 9000, it is very important to have a good idea of what a standard is

Vardeman, Stephen B.

222

Comment Response for DOE O 475.2B, Identifying Classified Information  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This draft has been scheduled for final review before the Directives Review Board on 8-21-14. All major comments and concerns should be provided to your DRB representative, following your organization process. If you do not know who your representative is, please see the list of DRB members at https://www.directives.doe.gov/beta/references/directives-review-board. If your office is represented by Ingrid Kolb, Director, Office of Management, please submit your major concerns and comments to the DRB Liaison, Camille Beben (Camille.Beben@hq.doe.gov; 202-586-1014). All major comments and concerns should be submitted by COB 8-19-2014.

223

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......critical nature of the review: "... I feel that...that are to be BOOK REVIEWS 575 directed to the special...events" or to the standard machinery of dice, etc...further problems. The plan of the book is conventional...with nine chapters on standard methods for discrete......

D. J. Finney

1981-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

224

EIA-930 Comments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

30 Comments 30 Comments Tim Hattaway PowerSouth Energy Cooperative Page 1 PowerSouth Energy Cooperative appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Form EIA-930 report, ''Balancing Authority Operations Report''. We have several concerns with the proposed data collection effort. Some concerns PowerSouth has with the proposal are:  The DOE is seeking hourly information within minutes of the time that it becomes available to the BA in very raw form. Many times, we will not have the data available by 10-minutes after an hour due to meter error, communication glitches, etc. Providing the data in such a way will lead to many errors and gaps with the data being provided.  For a smaller sized BA such as PowerSouth, we are concerned by amount of work that will be

225

Draft WAPA Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Resource Advocates ● Natural Resources Defense Council ● Resource Advocates ● Natural Resources Defense Council ● Interwest Energy Alliance ● The Wilderness Society ● Western Grid Group Group Comments on Western Area Power Administration's Renewable Energy Transmission Program April 1, 2009 I. Introduction On behalf of Western Resource Advocates, Natural Resources Defense Council, Interwest Energy Alliance, The Wilderness Society and Western Grid Group, please accept the following comments in response to Western Area Power Administration's ("Western") Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments regarding the implementation of Section 402 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 74 Fed. Reg. 9391-9393 (Mar. 4, 2009). The 2009 Recovery Act specifically provides $3.25 billion in new borrowing authority for

226

EA and SOWP Comments  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

EA and SOWP Comments EA and SOWP Comments This document covers Knight Piisold's technical comments to the Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site (EA) and the Shiprock Site Observational Work Plan (SOWP). The major areas of concern include the following: 1. The contaminant sources on site may not be properly defined. In particular, the disposal cell and the residual vadose zone soil contamination need to be redefined in the conceptual model and the transport model. 2. The documents contain no compliance plan, making it difficult to ascertain if regulatory guidelines are being met. 3. The results of the risk assessment are not linked to the establishment of the remedial goals 4. The current design of the evaporation pond may pose environmental risks due to their

227

National Electric Transmission Congestion Study- Draft for Public Comment August 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The public comment period closed on October 20, 2014. The draft study is available for review and downloading.

228

Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available April 3, 2012 - 2:12pm Addthis On October 5, 2011, the White House announced the creation of a Rapid Response Team for Transmission (RRTT). In support of the RRTT the Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability released a Federal Register Notice seeking information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. The Request for Information focused on making the development times for generation and transmission more commensurate with one another. Public comments received from the following organizations are now available for review and downloading. - Allegheny Highlands Alliance - American Electric Power

229

Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment March 15, 2013 - 11:08am Addthis Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment DOE has issued the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (ULP PEIS)(DOE/EIS-0472D) for public review and comment. The document is available here and on the ULP PEIS website. Under the Uranium Leasing Program, the DOE Office of Legacy Management administers 31 tracts of land in Mesa, Montrose, and San Miguel counties that are leased to private entities to mine uranium and vanadium. The program covers an area of approximately 25,000 acres. No mining operations are active on the ULP lands at this time. DOE is preparing the ULP PEIS to

230

PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions Taken Under U.S. Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-07-02: Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") has reviewed the Special Environmental Analysis ("SEA") referenced above, dated November, 2006, and is providing the following brief comments for your consideration as the Department of Energy ("DOE") continues to evaluate the operating status of the Potomac River

231

DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Certification and Enforcement Notice Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking October 15, 2010 - 10:22am Addthis In response to a formal request, the Department has extended to October 29, 2010, the deadline for submission of comments in response to the Notice or Proposed Rulemaking on the certification and enforcement of the Department's energy conservation standards. (75 FR 56796). The signed extension provided here will be published shortly in the Federal Register. Addthis Related Articles DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act Department of Energy Issues Final Rule on Loan Guarantees

232

DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure June 30, 2010 - 3:02pm Addthis Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a draft interpretative rule clarifying its views on the application of the current residential clothes washer test procedure to machines that offer a warm rinse option that is not included in the recommended cycle for washing cotton or linen clothes. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here, until July 30, 2010. Addthis Related Articles DOE Seeks Comment on Definition of Showerhead Save Energy and More with ENERGY STAR. ENERGY STAR clothes washers use 50% less energy to wash clothes than standard washing machines.

233

Overview of ozone human exposure and health risk analyses used in the U.S. EPA's review of the ozone air quality standard.  

SciTech Connect

This paper presents an overview of the ozone human exposure and health risk analyses developed under sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These analyses are being used in the current review of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone. The analyses consist of three principal steps: (1) estimating short-term ozone exposure for particular populations (exposure model); (2) estimating population response to exposures or concentrations (exposure-response or concentration-response models); and (3) integrating concentrations or exposure with concentration-response or exposure-response models to produce overall risk estimates (risk model). The exposure model, called the probabilistic NAAQS exposure model for ozone (pNEM/03), incorporates the following factors: hourly ambient ozone concentrations; spatial distribution of concentrations; ventilation state of individuals at time of exposure; and movement of people through various microenvironments (e.g., outdoors, indoors, inside a vehicle) of varying air quality. Exposure estimates are represented by probability distributions. Exposure-response relationships have been developed for several respiratory symptom and lung function health effects, based on the results of controlled human exposure studies. These relationships also are probabilistic and reflect uncertainties associated with sample size and variability of response among subjects. The analyses also provide estimates of excess hospital admissions in the New York City area based on results from an epidemiology study. Overall risk results for selected health endpoints and recently analyzed air quality scenarios associated with alternative 8-hour NAAQS and the current 1-hour standard for outdoor children are used to illustrate application of the methodology.

Whitfield, R. G.

1999-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

234

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS RESPONSES TO PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR LEASE OF LAND AND FACILITIES AT THE EAST TENNESSEE TECENOLOGY PARK OAK RIDGE,TENNESSEE @OE/EA-1175) NOVEMBER 1997. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE [blank page] CONTENTS 1 1 . INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 2. SCOPE AND ORGANIZATIONS ................................................... 3 3. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES .i ................................................. 5 3.1 DOE NEPA Review Process/Categorical Exclusions .............................. 5 3.1.1 SummaryofComments ............................................... 5 3.1.2 Response/Revisions .................................................. 5

235

HUD's Environmental Review Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

An environmental review is the process of reviewing a project and its potential environmental impacts to determine whether it meets federal, state, and local environmental standards. The...

236

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......algebra and the book under review is a worthy addition...ten years or so. BOOK REVIEWS 99 The book has four...prime ideals, but the standard result that the nilradical...UFD if all its 100 BOOK REVIEWS invertible ideals are...of Euclid. In general plan, the volume consists......

D. Rees

1971-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standby and Off Mode Standby and Off Mode Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to establish test procedures for microwave ovens standby and off mode. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). This rulemaking is related to the microwave ovens standard and test procedure. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a final rule for test procedures for microwave ovens. 78 FR 4015 (January 18, 2013). Public Meeting Information No public meeting is scheduled at this time. Submitting Public Comments The comment period is closed.

238

The Standards Actions, October 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

cop- cop- ies for comment. The full text of these documents is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown below. If you wish to com- ment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • Radiological Control Technician Training, TRNG-0003, (Peter O’Connell, EH-52, 301-903- 5641, Peter.O’Connell@eh. doe.gov) comments due No- vember 16, 1998. • Guide to Good Practices for the Selection, Training, and Qualifi- cation of Shift Supervisors, TRNG-0009, (John A. Yoder, EH- 31, 301-903-5650, John.Yoder@eh.doe.gov) comments due November 18, 1998. Note that this document is a conversion and revision of DOE-STD-1061-93. DOE Documents Recently Published The following DOE document has recently been published: • DOE-HDBK-1114-98, Guide to Good Practices for Line and Train-

239

Book Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......majority, living standards have plummeted and...5, 2003 526 BOOK REVIEWS discusses some basic...programming language Standard ML: CML (Concurrrent ML), Facile and PLAN (Packet Language...CML, Facile and PLAN to the reader who is familiar with Standard ML. Then (third......

Ferruccio Damiani

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Comments to DOE QER Quadrennial Energy Review:  

Energy Savers (EERE)

as recently ordered by FERC. While additional regulations may enhance the physical security of our grid, redundancy is our first line of defense against all threats, natural...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Review Comments1 Richard Vogl2  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

for energy may be a way that the latent brush fighters may be able to renew their costly war on brush-homes, and unnatural fires. Even the indestructible tropical forests of the world are now being irreversibly destroyed chaparral ecosystems. Ecologists maintain that the native plant growth that has become established

Standiford, Richard B.

242

EA-1881: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards 81: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts EA-1881: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to amend energy conservation standards for various consumer products and certain commercial and industrial equipment, including fluorescent lamp ballasts. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download October 20, 2011 EA-1881: Finding of No Significant Impact Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts (October 2011) October 5, 2011 EA-1881: Final Environmental Assessment Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Fluorescent

243

AR5 WGIII Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WGIII Review Print E-mail WGIII Review Print E-mail Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report: Working Group III Introduction: The United States Global Change Research Program, in cooperation with the Department of State, request expert review of the Second Order Draft of the Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Pre-register Today To be notified when the Second Order Draft of the Working Group III contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 5th Assessment report is available for review, please click here. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research Program is coordinating the submission of comments by U.S. experts to inform development of an integrated set of U.S. Government comments on the report. Expert comments must be received via the internet-based application by Midnight, Eastern Daylight Time, 27 March 2013 to be considered for inclusion in the U.S. Government submission. An expert reviewer may also be asked to participate in the government review organized within his or her own country. In such a case, he/she should submit comments either as an individual or as part of the government review, but not both.

244

AR5 WGII Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WGII Review Print E-mail WGII Review Print E-mail Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report: Working Group II Introduction: The United States Global Change Research Program, in cooperation with the Department of State, request expert review of the Second Order Draft of the Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate Change 2013: Impacts, Adaptation and Vlunerability. Pre-register Today To be notified when the Second Order Draft of the Working Group II contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 5th Assessment report is available for review, please click here. On behalf of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Global Change Research Program is coordinating the submission of comments by U.S. experts to inform development of an integrated set of U.S. Government comments on the report. Expert comments must be received via the internet-based application by Midnight, Eastern Daylight Time, 1 May 2013 to be considered for inclusion in the U.S. Government submission. An expert reviewer may also be asked to participate in the government review organized within his or her own country. In such a case, he/she should submit comments either as an individual or as part of the government review, but not both.

245

Develop Standard Method of Test for Integrated Heat Pump - 2013...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Develop Standard Method of Test for Integrated Heat Pump - 2013 Peer Review Develop Standard Method of Test for Integrated Heat Pump - 2013 Peer Review Emerging Technologies...

246

Standard Energy Efficiency Database Platform - 2013 BTO Peer...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Standard Energy Efficiency Database Platform - 2013 BTO Peer Review Standard Energy Efficiency Database Platform - 2013 BTO Peer Review commlbldgs09prindle040313.pdf More...

247

Microsoft Word - DOE Comments on IIP  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

David R. Moeller David R. Moeller Senior Attorney 218-723-3963 dmoeller@allete.com October 30, 2013 Julie A. Smith Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Mail Code: OE-20 United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: Minnesota Power's Comments Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53,436 (August 29, 2013) Dear Ms. Smith and Mr. Lawrence: Minnesota Power hereby provides comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") in the above-referenced Federal Register publication. Minnesota Power has been working closely with the DOE and other state and

248

Geological Problems in Radioactive Waste Isolation: Second Worldwide Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Review comments on that plan from the Nuclear Regulatoryreview by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, of a Site Characterization Plan.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

2013 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Technology Integration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

technical accomplishments included analysis, education and outreach, website and social media engagement, and the completion of the final plan. The reviewer commented in...

250

RICAP-07: Summary comments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Roma International Conference on Astroparticle Physics covered gamma-ray astronomy, air shower experiments and neutrino astronomy on three successive days. I organize my brief summary comments into four topics that cut across these three techniques. They are detector calibration, galactic sources, extra-galactic sources and cosmology.

Thomas K. Gaisser

2008-01-29T23:59:59.000Z

251

EIS-0380: Notice to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0380: Notice to Extend Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico In response to requests for additional time to review and comment on the document, NNSA is extending the public comment period until September 20, 2006. DOE/EIS-0380, Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 76 FR 40352 (August 2006) More Documents & Publications EIS-0380: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Site-Wide Environmental

252

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). I have reviewed the Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). In the Department of Energy"s (DOE) attempt to meet its obligation to implement Executive Order 13563, ""Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,"" issued by the President on January 18, 2011, I recommend DOE make a bold move to change

253

Safety, Codes, and Standards | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Safety, Codes, and Standards Safety, Codes, and Standards 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, May 18-22,...

254

Yes/No COMMENTS Containment zones and associated corridors to be separated  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

with function. 3.4.6 CBSG Ref # Yes/No COMMENTS HVAC system to provide sufficient air changes per hour (AC by the Canadian Biosafety Standards and Guidelines (CBSG), 1st Ed. (2013). Air Handling Facility Services

Kavanagh, Karen L.

255

Notice and Request for Comments, Federal Register, 71 FR 7749, February 14, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Document displays the notice and request for comments for Standard for Premium Energy-Efficient Electric Motors for Federal Acquisition, which was published in the Federal Register on February 14, 2006.

256

Evaluation of the WIPP Project`s compliance with the EPA radiation protection standards for disposal of transuranic waste  

SciTech Connect

The US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA) proposed rule to certify that the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) meets compliance with the long-term radiation protection standards for geologic repositories (40CFR191 Subparts B and C), is one of the most significant milestones to date for the WIPP project in particular, and for the nuclear waste issue in general. The Environmental Evaluation Group (EEG) has provided an independent technical oversight for the WIPP project since 1978, and is responsible for many improvements in the location, design, and testing of various aspects of the project, including participation in the development of the EPA standards since the early 1980s. The EEG reviewed the development of documentation for assessing the WIPP`s compliance by the Sandia National Laboratories following the 1985 promulgation by EPA, and provided many written and verbal comments on various aspects of this effort, culminating in the overall review of the 1992 performance assessment. For the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) compliance certification application (CCA), the EEG provided detailed comments on the draft CCA in March, 1996, and additional comments through unpublished letters in 1997 (included as Appendices 8.1 and 8.2 in this report). Since the October 30, 1997, publication of the EPA`s proposed rule to certify WIPP, the EEG gave presentations on important issues to the EPA on December 10, 1997, and sent a December 31, 1997 letter with attachments to clarify those issues (Appendix 8.3). The EEG has raised a number of questions that may have an impact on compliance. In spite of the best efforts by the EEG, the EPA reaction to reviews and suggestions has been slow and apparently driven by legal considerations. This report discusses in detail the questions that have been raised about containment requirements. Also discussed are assurance requirements, groundwater protection, individual protection, and an evaluation of EPA`s responses to EEG`s comments.

Neill, R.H.; Chaturvedi, L.; Rucker, D.F.; Silva, M.K.; Walker, B.A.; Channell, J.K.; Clemo, T.M. [Environmental Evaluation Group, Albuquerque, NM (United States)] [Environmental Evaluation Group, Albuquerque, NM (United States); [Environmental Evaluation Group, Carlsbad, NM (United States)

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

257

Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for significant onshore electric transmission projects requiring Federal authorizations. On September 25, the public comment period was extended to October 31, 2013. Comments received are available below. Comments from Lee Cunningham, sent September 23, 2013 Comments from Patrick Ledger of Arizona's G&T Cooperatives, sent September 25, 2013

258

Keeping up standards  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......24 Two major security standards have been revised to...2:2002 introduces a plan-docheck-act cycle...each section are: ? Plan: define the scope of...implemented controls, review the levels of residual...This became a British Standard in 1995 (BS 7799......

Willie List

2002-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies Energy Conservation Standard Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is amending the current energy conservation standards for Class A external power supplies and establishing new energy conservation standards for battery chargers and non-Class A external power supplies. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). This Rulemaking is related to the Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies Standard and Test Procedure. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a request for information regarding energy conservation standards for battery chargers and external power supplies. 78 FR 18253 (March 26, 2013).

260

Radiation protection standards: their evolution from science to philosophy  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......require a new shielding evaluation (plan review), and they will certainly require...2001). Radiation protection standards: their evolution from science...control Radiation Monitoring standards Radiation Protection standards......

R. L. Dixon; Joel E. Gray; B. R. Archer; D. J. Simpkin

2005-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

The Standards Actions, April 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

these documents is available on the Technical Standards Pro- these documents is available on the Technical Standards Pro- gram (TSP) Web Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • Content of System Design Descriptions, Project Number EDCO- 0001; John Fredlund, DP-45; 301-903-3059, FAX 301-903-8754, Fredlund@dpmail.dp.doe.gov, comments due May 15, 1998. DOE Documents Recently Published DOE employees and DOE con- tractors may obtain copies from the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; telephone 423-576-8401 or FAX 423-576-5728. Subcontractors and the general public may obtain copies from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, Na- tional Technical Information Ser- vice, Springfield, Virginia 22161;

262

SPPR Project Customer Comments Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The following entities have provided comments on the SPPR Project as proposed by Western in the October 6, 2010 customer meeting. Colorado River Commission of Nevada...

263

Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Bonneville Power Administration Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration BPA appreciates the opportunity to provide comments and information and submits the following...

264

Brand Standards Brand StandardsBrand Standards  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Brand Standards 6.6.11 #12;Brand StandardsBrand Standards VISUAL IDENTITY AND BRANDING INITIATIVE, the visual image presented to the public by the units of the University and UMMC often is confusing the organizations' public image under a cohesive, easily recognized visual identity that relies upon a common

Weber, David J.

265

Standards, Ethics  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standards, Ethics Ombuds Standards and Ethics Committed to the fair and equitable treatment of all employees, contractors, and persons doing business with the Laboratory. Contact...

266

Formal design review report project W-151 mixer pump procurement  

SciTech Connect

A formal design review for WHC-S-0040 was held on January 21, 1993. The review was completed January 29, 1993. No outstanding action items existed. Comments were recorded on Record Comment Record (RCR) forms and incorporated into the specification. The specification was considered acceptable, approved and issued as WHC-S-0040, Rev. 0 on March 4, 1993.

Crass, D.W.

1997-01-21T23:59:59.000Z

267

West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment March 11, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor (513) 246-0539 william.taylor@emcbc.doe.gov West Valley, New York - The U.S. Department of Energy today released a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) Evaluation of a vitrification melter at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) for review and comment by the public, states and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This draft evaluation shows that the melter meets the criteria for "waste incidental to reprocessing" and may be managed and disposed of as low-level radioactive waste (LLW). It is an important step in DOE's efforts to clean up the WVDP and meet its obligations under the WVDP Act of

268

Capsule Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......to provide a short succinct review of each paper in the issue...wider readership. The Capsule Reviews were compiled by Fairouz Kamareddine...the optimized implementation plan (IP) used to describe how...Architectures (OMEGA) where the standard Meta Object Facility (MOF......

Fairouz Kamareddine

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

Public invited to comment on additional proposed modications to WIPP hazardous waste permit  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Invited to Comment on Additional Proposed Modifications Public Invited to Comment on Additional Proposed Modifications To WIPP Hazardous Waste Permit CARLSBAD, N.M., April 26, 2000 - The public is invited to comment on additional proposed modifications to the hazardous waste facility permit for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Earlier this month, DOE and the Westinghouse Waste Isolation Division requested -- through three Class 2 permit modification submittals -- that the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) change certain provisions of the state permit. On April 20, DOE and Westinghouse submitted to NMED three additional Class 2 permit modifications. The Class 2 submittals begin a formal review process that includes a 60-day public comment period and two separate public meetings. Written comments will be accepted by

270

Review. Ernie Perry, PhD  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Mid-America Freight Coalition comments for the Quadrennial Energy Review. Ernie Perry, PhD University of Wisconsin - Madison ebperry@wisc.edu August 8 2014 Chicago, Il. Thank you...

271

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

consensus standards, U.S. Department of Energy orders and standards, and National Fire Protection Association standards and requirements. Independent Oversight Review, Los...

272

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Energy Conservation Standard High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products High-intensity discharge (HID) lamps include mercury vapor (MV), metal halide (MH), and high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps. The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering establishing energy conservation standards for certain HID lamps. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). (42 USC 6311-6317) Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of interim technical support document regarding energy conservation standards for high-intensity discharge lamps. 78 FR 13566 (February 28, 2013).

273

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Low-Voltage Dry-Type Distribution Transformers Energy Conservation Standard Low-Voltage Dry-Type Distribution Transformers Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) has completed a rulemaking to amend the current energy conservation standards for liquid-immersed, medium-voltage dry-type, and low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers. This activity is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a final rule regarding amended energy efficiency standards for liquid-immersed, medium-voltage dry-type, and low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers. 78 FR 23335 (April 18, 2013). The distribution transformers final rule was the DOE's first "negotiated rulemaking," conducted under the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act.

274

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Wine Chillers and Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products Standard Wine Chillers and Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is initiating a rulemaking to develop a potential test procedure and energy conservation standard for miscellaneous residential refrigeration products, which include wine chillers and other products that are not currently covered as residential refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, or freezers. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document regarding energy conservation standards for residential wine chillers and other residential refrigeration products. 77 FR 7547 (February 13, 2012).

275

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commercial and Industrial Pumps Energy Conservation Standards Commercial and Industrial Pumps Energy Conservation Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering developing test procedures, labels, and energy conservation standards for commercial and industrial pumps. Pumps exist in numerous applications, including agriculture, oil and gas production, water and wastewater, manufacturing, mining, and commercial building systems. There are currently no federal standards or test procedures for commercial and industrial pumps. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document regarding commercial and industrial pumps. 78 FR 7304 (February 1, 2013).

276

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures Energy Conservation Standard Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering establishing new and amended energy conservation standards for metal halide lamp fixtures (MHLF). This activity is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309 seq). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding energy conservation standards for metal halide lamp fixtures. 78 FR 51463 (August 20, 2013). Public Meeting Information A public meeting was held on September 27, 2013.

277

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines Energy Conservation Standards Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines Energy Conservation Standards Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering amending energy conservation standards for refrigerated beverage vending machines (BVMs) as required by (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document regarding energy conservation standards for refrigerated beverage vending machines. 78 FR 33262 (June 4, 2013). Public Meeting Information A public meeting was held on June 20, 2013.

278

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide10 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide10 My Own Oral History Having done such a pre-internet literature review for my own PhD almost 40 years ago, let me offer a brief oral history. Royal Sabre Portable Typewriter 1973-1974 Note: Most PhD students need not do a full blown literature review. Typically, PhD students need only add recent literature to an already existing lit review. Note: I was not the typical student. My dissertation capitalized on my research project at the U.S. Naval Research Lab, where I was employed. None of my faculty had specialized in such topics. Thus: I had to do a full blown lit review from scratch. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply

279

Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking The Institute for Market Transformation respectfully submits these comments on the Department of Energy's notice of proposed rulemaking on Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings. Comments of the Institute for Market Transformation on the Dept. of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking More Documents & Publications

280

Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC on Implementing the National...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company...

282

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx More Documents &...

283

Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Comments from PNM Resources, sent October 29, 2013 Comments from the Arizona Game and Fish Department, sent October 29, 2013 Comments from Minnesota Power, sent October 30, 2013...

284

Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company BGE comments to DOE addressing policy and logistical challenges Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric...

285

CA IOUs Comment Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 19, 2012 June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers.

286

Comments April 11.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tom or Julie Laub Tom or Julie Laub Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:09 PM To: contractor pensions Subject: Comments on Contractor Employee Pension and Medical Benefits Challenge I'm sure you've heard this before but as for employee's of National Laboratories the total benefits package should not be limited to 5% above "market average." You do not want average employees at a National Laboratory--you want the best and the brightest. Don't count on a sense of national pride to keep the exceptional employee at a National Laboratory. It is hard to have national pride when your nation does not appreciate your hard work and special talents. You can make more money some place other than a National Lab so the benefits have to be the way appreciation is shown. Benefits at National Labs have been in decline

287

The following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Sol  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces and accessories therefore. --- Ingersoll Rand appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's request for information on "Reducing Regulatory Burden" in the spirit of Executive Order 13563 ---- It is ironic that the response interval for the RFI on reducing regulatory burden overlaps the issuance of the Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment; Final Rule [the enforcement rule]. That rule

288

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide04 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 13:29 FY2011-Jordan Slide04 Founding Agencies in 2001 * Department of Agriculture * Department of Commerce * Department of Defense * Department of Education * Department of Energy * Department of Health and Human Services * Department of Interior * Environmental Protection Agency * National Aeronautics and Space Administration * National Science Foundation New Alliance Members * Department of Transportation * Library of Congress * United States Government Printing Office * National Archives and Records Administration Alliance only * United States Forest Service * National Institute of Standards and Technology Support and coordination by CENDI - an interagency forum of senior information managers Add new comment

289

Interim Report of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

SUMMARY: This notice announces an opportunity to comment on the proposed Interim Report of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission).

290

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes polices and procedures for carrying out the EPA's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

291

Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This manual establishes policies and procedures for carrying out the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

292

Non-standard Neutrino Interactions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Theories beyond the Standard Model must respect its gauge symmetry. This implies strict constraints on the possible models of Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions (NSIs). We review here the present status of NSIs from the point of view of effective field theory. Our recent work on the restrictions implied by Standard Model gauge invariance is provided along with some examples of possible gauge invariant models featuring non-standard interactions.

D. Hernandez

2009-11-25T23:59:59.000Z

293

The standard model and beyond  

SciTech Connect

In these lectures, my aim is to present a status report on the standard model and some key tests of electroweak unification. Within that context, I also discuss how and where hints of new physics may emerge. To accomplish those goals, I have organized my presentation as follows. I survey the standard model parameters with particular emphasis on the gauge coupling constants and vector boson masses. Examples of new physics appendages are also commented on. In addition, I have included an appendix on dimensional regularization and a simple example which employs that technique. I focus on weak charged current phenomenology. Precision tests of the standard model are described and up-to-date values for the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) mixing matrix parameters are presented. Constraints implied by those tests for a 4th generation, extra Z' bosons, and compositeness are discussed. An overview of the physics of tau decays is also included. I discuss weak neutral current phenomenology and the extraction of sin/sup 2//theta/W from experiment. The results presented there are based on a global analysis of all existing data. I have chosen to concentrate that discussion on radiative corrections, the effect of a heavy top quark mass, implications for grand unified theories (GUTS), extra Z' gauge bosons, and atomic parity violation. The potential for further experimental progress is also commented on. Finally, I depart from the narrowest version of the standard model and discuss effects of neutrino masses, mixings, and electromagnetic moments. 32 refs., 3 figs., 5 tabs

Marciano, W.J.

1989-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

Hydrogen Codes and Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Codes and Standards Codes and Standards James Ohi National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Blvd. Golden, CO 80401 Background The development and promulgation of codes and standards are essential if hydrogen is to become a significant energy carrier and fuel because codes and standards are critical to establishing a market-receptive environment for commercializing hydrogen-based products and systems. The Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Program of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), with the help of the National Hydrogen Association (NHA) and other key stakeholders, are coordinating a collaborative national effort by government and industry to prepare, review, and promulgate hydrogen codes and standards needed to expedite hydrogen infrastructure development. The

295

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE HEAVY METAL SALTS (selected)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MSDS ___Special training provided by the department/supervisor ___Review of the OSHA Lab Standard ___Review of the departmental safety manual ___Review of the Chemical Hygiene Plan ___Safety meetings12.1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE for HEAVY METAL SALTS (selected) Location

Pawlowski, Wojtek

296

PARS II Standard Operating Procedure Business Rules  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 25, 2011 June 25, 2011 U.S. Department of Energy The PARS II Standard Operating Procedure is a "living document" and will be updated on an ongoing basis. Comments or suggestions are welcome and should be forwarded to the PARS II administrator at PARSIIsupportoecm@hq.doe.gov. Notes Comment Pages Comment Pages Index Screenshot Pages Introduction I-1 Generic Business Rules I-2 Select Project I-3 - I-5 Enter/Modify Project Information I-6 - I-15 Enter/Modify Contact Information I-16 - I-21 Creating a Project I-22 Enter CD0 Information I-23 - I-26 Enter CD1 Information I-27 - I-29 Enter CD2 Information I-30 - I-33 Enter CD3A Information I-34 - I-36 Enter CD3 Information I-37 - I-39 Enter CD4 Information I-40 - I-42 Enter Closeout Information I-43 - I-45 Enter BCP Information I-46 - I-50 Screenshot

297

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commercial Clothes Washers Energy Conservation Standard Commercial Clothes Washers Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering whether to revise its energy conservation standards for commercial clothes washers. This current rulemaking will satisfy the requirement to publish the second final rule by January 1, 2015 as mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates The DOE published a notice of public meeting and availability of the framework document for commercial clothes washers. 77 FR 48108 (August 13, 2012). Public Meeting Information

298

The Standards Actions February 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Actions Technical Standards Program Document Status as of 1/31/96 In Preparation 5 7 Out for Comment 2 1 Total in process = 78 Published in Past 30 Days 0 In Conversion 2 3 Projects Initiated The following DOE technical standards projects were recently initiated. If you are interested in participating in the development of these standards, please contact the persons listed below. * Handbook for the Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation Program for Radiobioassay, Project No. SAFT-0049; Robert Loesch, EH-52; 301-903- 4443, Email, loesch@viper.eh.doe.gov. * Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors, Project No. 6910-0051; Ken L Maier, EH-31; 208-526- 9178, FAX 208-526-9650, Email, klm4@inel.gov. * Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of

299

The Standards Forum, September 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Black is the director of the Office of Nuclear and Facil- Black is the director of the Office of Nuclear and Facil- ity Safety Policy, in the Office of Environment, Safety and Health. He was formerly the director of the Office of Nuclear Safety Enforcement. Prior to joining the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in 1992, Mr. Black was a nuclear regulation con- sultant at TENERA L.P., an attorney at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and an attorney with the Internal Revenue Service. Recently, Mr. Black took time to respond to some questions from the Technical Stan- dards Program Office (TSPO) regarding the status of and "path forward" for the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP). His comments tell of the challenges facing the program and the entire DOE standards community. TSPO: How did you become involved in the Technical Standards Program?

300

FINAL-west-doe-rfi-comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October October 31, 2013 Mr. Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov Re: Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects, Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53436 (Aug. 29, 2013) Dear Mr. Lawrence: I. INTRODUCTION Western Energy Supply and Transmission Associates ("WEST") 1 respectfully submits these comments in response to the questions raised in the above-referenced Department of Energy (DOE) Request for Information (RFI). This RFI addresses the proposed pre-application process for siting of transmission projects requiring interagency

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U.S. Department  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U.S. of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U.S. Department of Energy's Request for Comment on Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency Testing (75 Fed. Reg. 52892 (August 30, 2010)) Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U.S. Department of Energy's Request for Comment on Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency Testing (75 Fed. Reg. 52892 (August 30, 2010)) The U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") has promulgated regulations that appear to subject essentially all vented gas fireplaces-including decorative gas fireplaces certified to the American National Standards Institute ("ANSI") Z21.50 standard-to heating efficiency standards, 75 Fed. Reg. 20112 (April 16, 2010). The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association ("HPBA") believes that this final rule was ill-considered

302

Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 15. 2011 April 15. 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Via Email: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Subject: Reducing Regulatory Burden, Request for Information, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 23, February 3, 2011 Dear Mr. Cohen: The American Gas Association (AGA) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the subject Department of Energy ("the Department") Request for Information (RFI) seeking comment and information to assist it in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether such regulations should be modified or repealed pursuant to Executive Order 13563 ("Improving

303

ANSI Electric Vehicle Standards Roadmap | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

ANSI Electric Vehicle Standards Roadmap ANSI Electric Vehicle Standards Roadmap 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and...

304

HEV, PHEV, BEV Test Standard Validation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HEV, PHEV, BEV Test Standard Validation HEV, PHEV, BEV Test Standard Validation 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and...

305

Hydrogen Codes and Standards and Permitting | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Codes and Standards and Permitting Hydrogen Codes and Standards and Permitting 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

306

Resolving Code and Standard Barriers to Building America Innovations...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Resolving Code and Standard Barriers to Building America Innovations - 2014 BTO Peer Review Resolving Code and Standard Barriers to Building America Innovations - 2014 BTO Peer...

307

Financial Aid Standards for SAP Page 1 Financial Aid Standards for  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Financial Aid Standards for SAP Page 1 Financial Aid Standards for Satisfactory Academic Progress Affects Your Financial Aid Eligibility Updated February 2012 #12;Financial Aid Standards for SAP Page 2 Standards Progress Review Appeal Process Probation Denied Appeals Reinstatement #12;Financial Aid Standards

Leistikow, Bruce N.

308

Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Below are links to information about how to comment on DOE NEPA projects with open comment periods, including comment periods on the proposed scope of planned NEPA documents and on draft NEPA documents (e.g., draft environmental assessments and draft environmental impacts statements). The end of each comment period is indicated below. EIS-0496: San Luis Transmission Project, Alameda, Merced, San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, California Scoping: Comment Period Ends 01/21/14 DOE's Western Area Power Administration, with the Bureau of Reclamation as a cooperating agency, is preparing a joint EIS and environmental impact report (under the California Environmental Quality Act) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed interconnection of certain

309

Training Standardization  

SciTech Connect

The article describes the benefits of and required process and recommendations for implementing the standardization of training in the nuclear power industry in the United States and abroad. Current Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) enable training standardization in the nuclear power industry. The delivery of training through the Internet, Intranet and video over IP will facilitate this standardization and bring multiple benefits to the nuclear power industry worldwide. As the amount of available qualified and experienced professionals decreases because of retirements and fewer nuclear engineering institutions, standardized training will help increase the number of available professionals in the industry. Technology will make it possible to use the experience of retired professionals who may be interested in working part-time from a remote location. Well-planned standardized training will prevent a fragmented approach among utilities, and it will save the industry considerable resources in the long run. It will also ensure cost-effective and safe nuclear power plant operation.

Agnihotri, Newal

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

BPA Integrated Program Review 1 Bonneville Power Administration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

BPA Integrated Program Review 1 Bonneville Power Administration Summary of public comments to BPA Northwest Power & Conservation Council Meeting #12;BPA Integrated Program Review 2 Integrated Program Review Process Purpose of Integrated Program Review: · Present all BPA's costs (Power, Transmission and Agency

311

Comments on Backreaction and Cosmic Acceleration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this brief WEB note we comment on recent papers related to our paper "On Acceleration Without Dark Energy".

E. W. Kolb; S. Matarrese; A. Riotto

2005-11-02T23:59:59.000Z

312

Comments on backreaction and cosmic acceleration  

SciTech Connect

In this brief WEB note we comment on recent papers related to our paper ''On Acceleration Without Dark Energy''.

Kolb, Edward W.; /Fermilab /Chicago U., Astron. Astrophys. Ctr. /Chicago U., EFI; Matarrese, Sabinio; /Padua U. /INFN, Padua; Riotto, Antonion; /CERN

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

Zero Zone Comment | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Order 13563 certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment...

314

Ecotourism and Certification: Setting Standards in Practice  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Review: Ecotourism and Certification: Setting Standards inMartha Honey (Ed. ). Ecotourism and Certification: SettingAlkaline paper. Tourism and ecotourism are growing rapidly,

Hook, Robert D.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

315

Non-standard Neutrino Oscillations at Icecube  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this talk I review the potential of Icecube for revealing physics beyond the standard model in the oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos.

M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia

2006-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

316

HEV, PHEV, BEV Test Standard Validation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BEV Test Standard Validation 2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Annual Merit Review May 10, 2011 Michael Duoba Argonne National Laboratory Sponsored by Lee Slezak...

317

Department of Energy Considers Comments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Department of Energy Considers Comments on Buried Waste Cleanup The U.S. Department of Energy is evaluating the input it received from the public during the recent public comment period on a proposed plan to cleanup buried waste at DOE's Idaho Site. "The Agencies are evaluating the input we received from the public," said Mark Arenaz, (WAG 7 Federal Project Director). "We appreciate those people and organizations who took the time to study the proposed plan and give us input. We got some very good suggestions that we will consider carefully." A total of 227 formal comments were received by DOE regarding the Proposed Plan for the Radioactive Waste Management Complex Operable Unit 7-13/14. The Proposed Plan presented five (5) alternatives to address waste remediation in the Subsurface Disposal Area, ranging from

318

Structure beyond the Standard Model  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...see Ross (1997) for a review and further references...superpartners of the Standard Model states. These...factorizable metric M2 Plan ck;4 = M2+ Plan ck;4+ nR and, provided...Structure beyond the Standard Model 415 10 100 10003...

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide11 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide11 Lit Review of 40 Years Ago Entailed: The use of massive volumes of a citation index. Looking up keywords related to the dissertation. Gathering citations to journal articles in the stacks at the University's library. Sitting at a desk perusing for hours the volumes of a citation index Writing down relevant citations. Walking through the library and pulling journals and finding articles. Examining hard copy and making notes by hand. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 89e5b37bc8 Your first name. Please enable Javascript to use this form. Subject: Comment: *

320

West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation June 29, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Bryan Bower 716-942-4368 Bill Taylor bill.taylor@srs.gov 803-952-8564 West Valley, NY - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today released to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the public and the states of Nevada and Texas, and the Seneca Nation of Indians for review and comment, a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the concentrator feed makeup tank and the melter feed hold tank (the vessels) at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP). This Draft Evaluation, which may enable the Department to dispose of the vessels as low-level radioactive waste (LLW), is a necessary step in the Department's cleanup efforts at

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide32 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-30 07:37 FY2010-open_gov Slide32 Federally Sponsored Research * December 2009: White House began seeking comments on improving public access to federally sponsored research. * Three-stage request for information closed at the end of January. * NIH model requires submission of electronic version of final peer-reviewed manuscript no later than 12 months after official date of publication. * While there has not yet been action from the White House, all indications are that the Administration will support free access to federally sponsored research. Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 3e13ee9b3e1 Your first name. Please enable Javascript to use this form.

322

Hawaii Bioenergy Master Plan Stakeholder Comment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Hawaii Bioenergy Master Plan Volume III Stakeholder Comment Prepared for State of Hawaii Department of Ocean Earth Sciences and Technology December 2009 #12;i Hawaii Bioenergy Master Plan Volume III Stakeholder Comment Comments on the Draft Hawaii Bioenergy Master Plan were solicited by posting the document

323

Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council and our more than 1.3 million members and online activists, we submit the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden. Comments_of_the_NRD Council_RRB_RFI_June2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Natural Resources Defense Council Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules

324

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating Procedures INDEPENDENT COST REVIEW (ICR) and INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) Standard Operating...

325

A Comparison of Cross-Sector Cyber Security Standards  

SciTech Connect

This report presents a review and comparison (commonality and differences) of three cross-sector cyber security standards and an internationally recognized information technology standard. The comparison identifies the security areas covered by each standard and reveals where the standards differ in emphasis. By identifying differences in the standards, the user can evaluate which standard best meets their needs. For this report, only cross-sector standards were reviewed.

Robert P. Evans

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

Find Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

-Safe Use of Optical Fiber Communication Systems Utilizing Laser Diode and LED Sources API ASCE ASHRAE ASME ASME-BPVC ASQ ASSE ASTM AWS CGA standards - contact Timothy Lopez...

327

Data Standards  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Data standards are common terms and methods for sharing data and exchange of information, which are used uniformly. The World Health Organization has proposed : collection in specific data forms, in alogical...

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

The development of the quality assurance program for PM2.5: The December 13, 1996 proposal, the July 18, 1997 regulations and the public comments concerning QA  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed a new National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) standard for particles in the atmosphere with aerometric diameters of 2.5 micrometers or less. The EPA has also promulgated a new federal reference and equivalent method program to regulate the methods needed to monitor these particles. This federal reference method (FRM) is very complex and sensitive and requires enhanced quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures to ensure that a valid sample is collected. The QA program for PM2.5 was first introduced in the December 13, 1996 proposal published in the Federal Register. This proposal outlined several QA procedures for the PM2.5 program. The precision of an existing monitoring network was to be determined with collocated monitors and flow checks. The bias of a monitoring network was to be determined with a new QA procedure that required bi-monthly audits on all PM2.5 monitors using a portable FRM audit sampler. Consistent with Agency policy, this proposal was open to public comment and review. The Agency received over 30,000 comments many of which concerned the QA program. The QA system was modified, based upon these comments, to reduce the logistical burden for the implementation of the program. The subsequent modifications were finalized in the July 18, 1997 regulations published in the Federal Register. This finalized QA program required 25% of the monitors to be collocated, quarterly flow audits on all PM2.5 monitors used in the SLAMS network, and 25% of all PM2.5 monitors to be independently audited with the new FRM audit sampler. Details of the QA system are found in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix A.

Musick, D.; Papp, M.; Elkins, J. [Environmental Protection Agency (United States)

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

329

Steam gasification of coal at low-medium (600-800{sup o}C) temperature with simultaneous CO{sub 2} capture in fluidized bed at atmospheric pressure: The effect of inorganic species. 1. Literature review and comments  

SciTech Connect

This paper addresses the H{sub 2} production with simultaneous CO{sub 2} capture by steam gasification of coal in a fluidized bed, at low/medium temperatures (600-800{sup o}C) and atmospheric pressure. This work is mainly aimed at reviewing the effects of the inorganic species present in the matrix of the coal or added to the gasifier bed. The most promising species seems to be the calcined limestone (CaO), which intervenes in the overall gasification reaction network in at least five different types of reactions. The effectiveness of the CaO for CO{sub 2} capture in the coal gasifier is, therefore, affected/influenced by the other four simultaneous or competitive types of reactions in the gasifier. The effects of the temperature in the gasifier and of the (CaO/coal) ratio fed to the gasifier are finally reviewed and discussed in detail.

Corella, J.; Toledo, J.M.; Molina, G. [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid (Spain). Dept. for Chemical Engineering

2006-08-30T23:59:59.000Z

330

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The report summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, which was held May 1317, 2013, in Arlington, Virginia.

331

20120131 DOE Congestion Study Clean Line Comments 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY 2012 NATIONAL ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION CONGESTION STUDY COMMENTS OF CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS LLC January 31, 2012 Clean Line Energy Partners LLC ("Clean Line") respectfully submits these comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Plan for Conduct of 2012 Electric Transmission Congestion Study ("Congestion Study") as published in the Federal Register on November 11, 2011. Clean Line appreciates the DOE's renewed efforts to gather and review existing and new transmission data across the nation (as per 76 FR 70122) to develop a list of congestion areas that may be eligible for backstop authority under 216a of the Federal Power

332

Comments on "Microscale flow visualization"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We make comments on the presentation of Sinton's paper (Microfluidics and Nanofluidics {\\bf 1}: 2, 2004) about the microscale flow visualization since the effects of the roughness along the microfabricated wall upon the current macroflow visualization methods could be significant and cannot be neglected in microdomain and even nanodomain.

A. Kwang-Hua Chu

2005-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

333

The Standards Actions, May 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

this document is available on the Technical Standards Program this document is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on this document, please notify your TSM. • Integrated Safety Management Systems Verification (ISMSV) Process, Team Leader’s Hand- book, Project Number SAFT- 0065; Jeffry Roberson, DP-45; 301-903-8026, jeffry.roberson @dp.doe.gov. DOE Documents Re- cently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: • DOE-HDBK-1113-97, Radiological Safety Training for Uranium Facilities, February 1998. DOE employees and DOE contractors may obtain copies from the DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; telephone 423-576-8401 or FAX 423-576-5728. Subcontractors and the general public may obtain copies from the

334

Standard Modeling  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standard no es suficiente Standard no es suficiente Avanzar Volver Principal ESTOY PERDIDO!!! Si bien el Modelo Standard proporciona una descripción muy buena de los fenómenos observados en los experimentos, todavía es una teoría incompleta. El problema es que el Modelo Standard no puede explicar la causa por la que existen algunas partículas, del modo en que lo hacen. Por ejemplo, aún cuando los físicos conocían las masas de todos los quarks, a excepción de la del quark top desde hace muchos años, no podían simplemente predecir en forma exacta la masa del top, sin utilizar evidencia experimental, dado que el Modelo Standard carece de un modelo matemático para calcular el patrón que siguen los valores de las masas de las partículas. Otra cuestión está relacionada con el hecho que existen tres pares de

335

Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews Draft for Public Review and Comment March 2013 2 Table of Contents: I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Questions and Answers .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Stage 1: Preliminary Questions ................................................................................................. 5 1. How Does NEPA and CEQA Terminology Differ? .................................................... 5 a. "Action" (NEPA) versus "Project" (CEQA) ................................................ 5

336

Cold vacuum drying facility 90% design review  

SciTech Connect

This document contains review comment records for the CVDF 90% design review. Spent fuels retrieved from the K Basins will be dried at the CVDF. It has also been recommended that the Multi-Conister Overpacks be welded, inspected, and repaired at the CVD Facility before transport to dry storage.

O`Neill, C.T.

1997-05-02T23:59:59.000Z

337

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide12 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide12 Lit Review of 40 Years Ago Because the indexing was of necessity quite crude, most of the articles I reviewed turned out not to be relevant to my dissertation. But the only way I could find this out was to check out hundreds of articles personally: Find the right volume of a journal, and examine each article one at a time. For relevant articles, I had to copy the citation info by hand and also capture the meat of the article by hand. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: fa7603dfbfa7 Your first name. Please enable Javascript to use this form. Subject:

338

Labor Standards Compliance, Contractor Labor Relations, and Contractor Workforce Restructuring Programs (For Informational Purposes Only)  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This draft has been scheduled for final review before the Directives Review Board on 07/17/14. All major comments and concerns should be provided to your DRB representative, following your organization process. If you do not know who your representative is, please see the list of DRB members. If your office is represented by Ingrid Kolb, Director, Office of Management, please submit your major concerns and comments to the DRB Liaison, Camille Beben (Camille.Beben@hq.doe.gov; 202-586-1014). All major comments and concerns should be submitted by COB 07/16/2014.

2014-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

339

Comment on Spacetime information  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A recent paper by Hartle [Phys. Rev. D 51, 1800 (1995)] proposes a definition of spacetime information the information available about a quantum systems boundary conditions in the various sets of decohering histories it may display and investigates its properties. We note here that Hartles analysis contains errors which invalidate several of the conclusions. In particular, the proof that the proposed definition agrees with the standard definition for ordinary quantum mechanics is invalid, the evaluations of the spacetime information for time-neutral generalized quantum theories and for generalized quantum theories with nonunitary evolution are incorrect, and the argument that spacetime information is conserved on spacelike surfaces in these last theories is erroneous. We show, however, that the proposed definition does, in fact, agree with the standard definition for ordinary quantum mechanics. Hartles definition relies on choosing, case by case, a class of fine-grained consistent sets of histories. We supply a possible general definition of a class of sets that includes all the sets considered in Hartles paper and that generalizes to other cases.

Adrian Kent

1997-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

340

The Standards Forum, March 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, Number 4 - March 2001 8, Number 4 - March 2001 The Standards News on the DOE Technical Standards Program Volume 8 - Number 4 - March 2001 DOE-TSL-1 The Department of Energy (DOE) Standards Index (DOE-TSL-1) has served to identify technical standards (both Government and non-Government) and standard- ization documents used by DOE and its contractors. Each year, the Technical Standards Program Office (TSPO) uses the DOE "Explorer" system to identify new/revised DOE directives that identify (a) non-Gov- ernment standards adopted for use by reference in the directive(s), and (b) documents prepared by other Federal agencies that DOE and its contractors use as technical stan- dards (in both instances, the review focuses on non-Government stan- dards and Federal documents not previously identified and recorded by

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Synchrophasor Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Development & Support Development & Support Kenneth Martin martin@electricpowergroup.com June 27-28, 2013 Washington, DC DOE/OE Transmission Reliability Program 2 Introduction  Synchrophasor measurement systems widely deployed  Enable a new generation of power system monitor & control capability - Improved power system analysis & system models - Wide area, high-resolution visibility - Basis for a new generation of controls  Research challenge - standards to enable interoperability - Measurement performance - Communications  Research focus - facilitate development, testing, and validation of standards to promote interoperability Basic phasor concept well known . A phasor is the complex form of the AC waveform √2 A cos (2 π ω 0 t + φ) A e

342

2010 DOE EERE Vehicle Technologies Program Merit Review ? Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

is very exciting to see a project that addresses the issue of how training links to the pipeline of employment-at least for the community college piece. One reviewer commented...

343

Standards for Chromatographic Data Communications, Storage, and Archiving  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......4). A viable standards development effort...and circulated for review; a prototype system...are refined; the standard or product is ap...Lysakowski. Proposed Plan for Industry-Wide Analytical Data Standards: The ADISS Architecture......

Rich Lysakowski

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

Safety Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US DOE Workshop US DOE Workshop September 19-20, 2012 International perspective on Fukushima accident Miroslav Lipár Head, Operational Safety Section M.Lipar@iaea.org +43 1 2600 22691 2 Content * The IAEA before Fukushima -Severe accidents management * The IAEA actions after Fukushima * The IAEA Action plan on nuclear safety * Measures to improve operational safety * Conclusions THE IAEA BEFORE FUKUSHIMA 4 IAEA Safety Standards IAEA Safety Standards F undamental S afety Principles Safety Fundamentals f o r p ro te c ti n g p e o p l e a n d t h e e n v i ro n m e n t IAEA Safety Standards Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material 2005 E dit ion Safety Requirements No. T S-R-1 f o r p ro te c ti n g p e o p l e a n d t h e e n v i ro n m e n t IAEA Safety Standards Design of the Reactor Core for Nuclear Power Plants

345

Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Portfolio Standard Portfolio Standard Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Program Info State New York Program Type Energy Efficiency Resource Standard In May 2007 the New York Public Service Commission (PSC) issued an order instituting a proceeding to develop an Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (EEPS). The order set a goal of reducing electricity usage in New York by 15% from projected electricity usage in 2015. After examining comments and input from staff and stakeholders, the PSC issued a further order in June 2008 establishing detailed program targets, ratepayer collections to fund energy efficiency programs, and various other protocols for the EEPS. The June 2008 order also established collections from natural gas customers to

346

ASHRAE's Residential Ventilation Standard: Exegesis of Proposed Standard 62.2  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In February 2000, ASHRAE's Standard Project Committee on "Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings", SPC 62.2P7 recommended ASHRAE's first complete standard on residential ventilation for public review...

Sherman, M.

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

EA-1774: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

774: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards 774: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment EA-1774: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the adoption of amended energy conservation standards as required by The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended) for direct heating equipment, as contained in the final rule titled, "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating quipment," would not be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the NEPA. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 22, 2010

348

Readiness Review RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Readiness Review Module Readiness Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R Readin Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan ness Rev view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) view e pplicability D-3 EMENT CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-

349

Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing section 216(h): Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing section 216(h): Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands Section 1221(a) of EPAct 2005, which added section 216(h) to the Federal Power Act, stated that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is to coordinate all Federal authorizations and related environmental reviews needed for siting interstate electric transmission projects, including National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) reviews. The purpose of this coordination is to streamline agencies' review processes and avoid duplication among Federal agencies. Section 216(h) of the Federal Power Act

350

Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance- Draft for Public Comment & Comment Submission Form (September 2014)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On September 12, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of the Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance for public comment. The draft Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance and comment submission form are available.

351

Energy Standard  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Hall Hall October 2011 Analysis of Impacts of a Clean www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Hall i Contacts This report, Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Hall, was prepared under the

352

Energy Standard  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Bingaman Bingaman November 2011 Analysis of Impacts of a Clean www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Bingaman i Contacts This report, Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard, as requested by Chairman Bingaman, was prepared

353

Earthquake prediction: a critical review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......prediction evaluation standards applied to the VAN...An International Review, edsSimpson D...before earthquakes: A review of possible sensory...Japan. U.S. plan Joint carthquake...prediction evaluation standards applied to the VAN...An Internationai Review, eds Simpson, D......

Robert J. Geller

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

354

Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures In response to an application, any person may file a protest, comments, or a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as applicable. Any person wishing to become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as applicable. Dockets Open for Public Comment A list of current dockets open for public comment can be found on the main Natural Gas Regulations page here. FILINGS: Filings may be submitted using one of the following methods. Please be sure to include Docket No. and Application Name with your filing: E-mail: fergas@hq.doe.gov (you must include FE Docket No. in the Subject line of the email) Regular Mail: (should include an original and three paper copies of

355

December 2007 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Standards Forum & Standards Actions Page 1 December 2007 The Standards Forum & Standards Actions Page 1 December 2007 Continued on next page Technical Standards Program Manager's Note 1 Teaching Standards Development- Inspiring the Next Generation 2 The EPA Radiation Standard for Spent-Fuel Storage in a Geological Repository 3 Expanded Access to Hydrogen Codes and Standards 4 Really Following the Building Code 6 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 7

356

University of Glasgow -1-Reform of Peer Review: Response to  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

University of Glasgow -1- Reform of Peer Review: Response to Consultation Introduction & Summary The University of Glasgow welcomes the opportunity to comment on these proposals for the reform of peer review and the introduction of processes to scrutinise the economic impact of research within the peer review process and we

Glasgow, University of

357

Building Technologies Office: About Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standards Standards Learn more about: History of Federal Appliance Standards How to Get Involved We rely on our appliances every day to cook and refrigerate our food, clean our clothes, heat our water, and perform many other daily tasks. But most of us take our appliances and the energy and water they use for granted. The operating cost of an appliance over its lifetime may be several times greater than its initial purchase price. Many consumers do not consider energy or water efficiency when making their purchases. But looking for an energy efficient model can save you money over the long run. Congress passed laws setting initial federal energy efficiency standards and establishing schedules for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to review and revise these standards. Standards benefit consumers by requiring that appliance manufacturers reduce the energy and water use of their products-and thus the costs to operate them.

358

Comments of ATT&T Inc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ATT&T Inc Comments of ATT&T Inc AT&T Inc comments on the Department of Energy's third Request for Information (RFI) on Smart Grid issues. Comments of ATT&T Inc More Documents &...

359

Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI...

360

Energy Efficiency Resource Standard | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Efficiency Resource Standard Efficiency Resource Standard Energy Efficiency Resource Standard < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Utility Program Info State Rhode Island Program Type Energy Efficiency Resource Standard Provider Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission Rhode Island enacted legislation in 2006 requiring the state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to establish standards for system reliability, energy efficiency and conservation procurement, including standards for energy supply diversification, distributed generation, demand response, and "prudent and reliable" energy efficiency and energy conservation measures. These standards and guidelines, which were adopted by the PUC in 2008, must be reviewed at least once every three years. Each electric and natural gas

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

04 04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is disseminated by the federal government. We published a proposed Bulletin on September 15, 2003. Based on public comments, we published a revised proposal for additional comment on April 28, 2004. We are now finalizing the April version, with minor revisions responsive to the public's comments. The purpose of the Bulletin is to enhance the quality and credibility of the government's scientific information. We recognize that different types of peer review are appropriate for different types of information. Under this Bulletin, agencies are granted broad

362

Comment on Creating Metastable Schrdinger Cat States  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by J. J. Slosser and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 418 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Mauro Fortunato

1996-09-09T23:59:59.000Z

363

Comment on Polarons in Carbon Nanotubes  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A Comment on the Letter by M. Verissimo-Alves et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3372 (2001). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

E. Piegari; V. Cataudella; V. Marigliano Ramaglia; G. Iadonisi

2002-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

364

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Supplemental Comments of the Plumbing Manufacturers Instititute Regarding the Economic Impacts of the Proposed Definition of "Showerhead," Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-NOA-0016...

365

Recommendation 192: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The ORSSAB Recommendations and Comments on the Draft 2010 Remediation Effectiveness Report for the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation.

366

SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Transmission Project Comments Provided to the US Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Request for Information Relating to the Permitting...

367

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Liquid-Immersed and Medium-Voltage Dry-type Distribution Transformers Energy Conservation Standard Liquid-Immersed and Medium-Voltage Dry-type Distribution Transformers Energy Conservation Standard Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) has completed a rulemaking to amend the current energy conservation standards for liquid-immersed, medium voltage dry-type, and low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers. This activity is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a final rule regarding amended energy efficiency standards for liquid-immersed, medium-voltage dry-type, and low-voltage dry-type distribution transformers. 78 FR 23335 (April 18, 2013). The distribution transformers final rule was the DOE's first "negotiated rulemaking," conducted under the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act.

368

Memorandum, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Memorandum, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments Memorandum, Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments The purpose of this memorandum is to distribute for interim use and comment a new draft Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standard for Control and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments. This Standard provides guidance and criteria for a standard approach to utilization of probabilistic risk assessments in nuclear safety applications. This interim Standard was developed by a team of experts from the DOE Program Secretarial Offices and private industry. DOE_Standard_Probabilistic_Risk_Assessments.pdf More Documents & Publications Cover Memorandum for new Department of Energy Standard for Control and Use

369

Federal Register Notice for Draft Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy announces the availability for public review and comment of the Draft Addendum To Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports Of...

370

May 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 2

371

Draft Voluntary Code of Conduct Available for Public Comment...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

comment on DOE's draft Voluntary Code of Conduct which addresses data privacy surrounding smart grid technologies. Comments must be received on or before October 14, 2014. In...

372

Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges...

373

Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges...

374

Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Ingersoll Rand Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Ingersoll...

375

EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Extend Public Comment Period EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States The Department of Energy and the Bureau of...

376

Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by...

377

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping. Antony's College Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

378

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Gardens Banbury Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

379

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Botley Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

380

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Westminster way Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping: Worcester College Walton Street Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance

Flynn, E. Victor

382

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Banbury Road Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

383

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping College Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

384

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Margaret's Road Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

385

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping: 13 St Bernards Rd Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer

Flynn, E. Victor

386

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping College St Giles Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

387

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Road OXFORD Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

388

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Parade Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

389

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Close Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

390

Comments for Planning Application 13/00832/FUL Application Summary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, 3 Fellows/Staff residential rooms, teaching facilities, library archive social space, landscaping Road Oxford Comment Details Commenter Type: Members of the Public Stance: Customer objects

Flynn, E. Victor

391

Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology...

392

Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and Complaint Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and...

393

Enhanced Geothermal Systems Documents for Public Comment - Now...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enhanced Geothermal Systems Documents for Public Comment - Now Closed Enhanced Geothermal Systems Documents for Public Comment - Now Closed February 28, 2012 - 3:41pm Addthis ****...

394

EA-1566: Notice of Comment Period Extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1566: Notice of Comment Period Extension Proposed Infrastructure Improvements for the Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada DOE is extending the public comment period for the Yucca...

395

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM...

396

DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Radioactive Waste DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste 1. Summary Comments on Draft Branch Technical Position on a Performance Assessment Methodology for Low-Level Radioactive...

397

Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on the U...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

U.S. Department of Energy's Request for Comment on Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency Testing (75 Fed. Reg. 52892 (August 30, 2010)) Comments of the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue...

398

EA-1919: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Public Comment Period Extension EA-1919: Notice of Public Comment Period Extension Recycling of Scrap Metals Originating from Radiological Areas DOE has extended the public...

399

City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:...

400

NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Microsoft Word - atni bpa contract template comments 071408.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in contract discussions. We have designed these comments with existing tribal utilities and potential new tribal utilities in mind. We support many of the comments of...

402

NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Burden RFI NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments...

403

NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reducing Regulatory Burden NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments...

404

Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Public Invited to Comment on Draft Environmental...

405

Public invited to comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

invited to comment on Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials NOTICE: DOE has extended the public comment period...

406

Support for City of Alexandria's Comments on the District of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EL05-145-000 Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Comments on Department of...

407

EA-1892: Direct Final Rule Energy Conservation Standards for Residential  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

92: Direct Final Rule Energy Conservation Standards for 92: Direct Final Rule Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnaces and Residential Central Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps EA-1892: Direct Final Rule Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnaces and Residential Central Air Conditioners & Heat Pumps Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to adopt energy conservation standards for various consumer products and certain commercial and industrial equipment, including residential furnaces and residential air conditioners and heat pumps, as required by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6291 et seq.). Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download June 27, 2011 EA-1892: Draft Environmental Assessment

408

Energy Department Announces January 2006 Deadline for Appliance Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 2006 Deadline for Appliance January 2006 Deadline for Appliance Standards Rulemaking Schedules Energy Department Announces January 2006 Deadline for Appliance Standards Rulemaking Schedules November 15, 2005 - 2:47pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced it will present schedules for all appliance rulemaking activities no later than January 31, 2006. The schedules will be developed following a public meeting held today to invite comment on standards scheduling issues. DOE will finalize its standards scheduling plan after consideration of comments received during and following the public meeting. "The Department of Energy's aggressive commitment to present schedules by January 31, 2006, is driven by our desire to speed up the process and

409

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide03 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 06:57 FY2008-interlab Slide03 The Science.gov Alliance 17 organizations from 13 agencies * Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Library United States Forest Service * Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology National Technical Information Service * Department of Defense Defense Technical Information Center * Department of Education National Library of Education * Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information * Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine * Department of Interior United States Geological Survey National Biological Information Infrastructure * Environmental Protection Agency

410

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide05 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 14:11 FY2009-jordan Slide05 Science.gov Databases Agriculture & Food * AGRICOLA * Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) Technology Transfer Automated Retrieval System (TEKTRAN) Applied Science & Technologies * DefenseLINK Website * DOT National Transportation Library Integrated Search * DTIC S & T Database * National Institute of Standards and Technology Data Gateway * U.S. Patent & Trademark Office Database Astronomy & Space * NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) * SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) Biology & Nature * NBII National Biological Information Infrastructure Earth & Ocean Sciences * NOAA Photo Library * USGS Publications Warehouse Energy &

411

Standards Actions - February 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Initiated Initiated The following DOE Technical Standards projects were recently initiated. If you have any questions or are interested in participating in the development of these stan- dards, please contact the persons listed below. Complete listings of all DOE Technical Stan- dards projects and their status are given in the Web Site referenced at the bottom of this page. To access these lists from the home page, click on “DOE Technical Standards,” then click on “Projects” in the left-hand frame to show the links to the project lists. • Preparation Guide for U.S. Department of Energy Non-Reactor Nuclear Facility Safety Analysis Reports, Project Number SAFT-0075 (5-year review/update of DOE-STD-3009-94); Richard W. Englehart, EH-31, 301-903-3718, Fax 301-903-1182, Richard.Englehart@hq.doe.gov. This

412

EXTERNAL INDEPENDENT REVIEW (EIR) STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIR GAANT CHART SCHEDULE ...22 APPENDIX D - LINES OF INQUIRYREQUIRED DOCUMENTATION ...23 D.1 EIR IN SUPPORT OF...

413

Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS - Volume 2: Comment and Response Document: Chapter 2: Comment Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Portsmouth DUF Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Final EIS 2 COMMENT DOCUMENTS This section provides copies of the actual letters or other documents containing public comments on the draft EISs that were submitted to DOE, including comments extracted from the transcripts of the public hearings. Table 2.1 contains an index of the comment documents by document number. Table 2.2 provides an index of comment documents by the commentors last name. Table 2.3 contains an index of comment documents by company or organization. Individual comments are denoted with vertical lines in the right margin. TABLE 2.1 Index of Commentors by Document Number Document Number Name Company/Organization Page D0001 Driver, Charles M. Individual 2-5 D0002 Kilrod, John Individual 2-7 D0003 Colley, Vina Portsmouth/Piketon Residents for Environmental Safety and Security

414

VALIDATION OF ANSI N42.34 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR HAND-HELD INSTRUMENTS FOR THE DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF RADIONUCLIDES  

SciTech Connect

SRNLs validation of ANSI N42.34-D6 for the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) was performed utilizing one hand-held instrument (or RID) the FLIR identiFINDER 2. Each section of the standard was evaluated via a walk-through or test. NOTE: In Table 1, W = walk-through and T = test, as directed by the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO). For a walk-through, the experiment was either setup or reviewed for setup; for a test, the N42.34-D6 procedures were followed with some exceptions and comments noted. SRNL is not fully able to evaluate a RID against Sections 7 (Environmental), 8 (Electromagnetic), and 9 (Mechanical) of N42.34, so those portions of this validation were done in collaboration with Qualtest, Inc. in Orlando, Florida. The walk-throughs and tests of Sections 7, 8, and 9 were performed in Qualtest, Inc. facilities with SRNL providing radiological sources as necessary. Where applicable, assessment results and findings of the walk-throughs and tests were recorded on datasheets and a validation summary is provided. A general comment pertained to test requirements found in another standard and referenced in N42.34-D6. For example, step 1 of the test method in section 8.1.2 states RF test set up information can be found in IEC 61000-4-3. It is recommended that any information from other standards necessary for conducting the tests within N42.34 should be posted in N42.34 for simplicity and to prevent the user from having to peruse other documents. Another general comment, as noted by Qualtest, is that a tolerance reference is not listed for each test in sections 7-9. Overall, the N42.34-D6 was proven to be practicable, but areas for improvement and recommendations were identified for consideration prior to final ballot submittal.

Lorier, T.

2014-09-03T23:59:59.000Z

415

Regulatory Review of a PSA  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

When preparing the review plan for the Bruce B Risk Assessment (BBRA), the CNSC had identified the construction of a replica using astandard PSA methodology and code as a major review tool. Also, the replica...

Philippe Hessel

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

High Intensity Discharge Lamps Test Procedures High Intensity Discharge Lamps Test Procedures Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products High-intensity discharge (HID) lamps include mercury vapor (MV), metal halide (MH), and high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps. The Department of Energy (DOE) is establishing test procedures for HID lamps. This rulemaking is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). ( 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309) This Rulemaking is related to the High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Standard and Test Procedure. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information Recent Updates DOE published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding test procedures for HID lamps. 76 FR 77914 (Dec. 15, 2011).

417

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dishwashers, Dehumidifiers, and Conventional Cooking Products Standby Mode and Off Mode Test Procedure Dishwashers, Dehumidifiers, and Conventional Cooking Products Standby Mode and Off Mode Test Procedure Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its test procedures for residential dishwashers, dehumidifiers, and conventional cooking products (kitchen ranges and ovens) to provide for measurement of standby mode and off mode energy use by these products. This activity is mandated by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). This Rulemaking is related to the Residential Dishwashers and Residential Dehumidifiers Standard and Test Procedure. Recent Updates | Public Meeting Information | Submitting Public Comments | Milestones and Documents | Related Rulemakings | Statutory Authority | Contact Information

418

Preparing Students for Peer Review.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

?? In order to enhance the effective use of peer review, I have developed materials to assist teachers in compliance with the standards for Masters' (more)

McMurry, Alison Irvine

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

419

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide06 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-09-12 13:22 quicktabs-title FY2006-stip-jordan Slide06 Science Research Connection: One Year Old In a single search, you (DOE and DOE contractors) can access public STI found in IB or ECD as well as access-limited STI Introduced many new features! Currently contains > 6 million bibliographic citations and > 175,000 full-text documents. DOE/DOE contractor requests: Over 1,000 FT documents requested Over half have been scanned and made available Currently 260 requests in process (e.g., review, scanning) Approx 260 document requests could not be "honored" because FT not available (journal articles, copyrighted books or conferences) Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply

420

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide20 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-30 06:35 FY2011-Anderson Slide20 Digitization of DOE Report Collections * With the current NE cost recovery efforts going on, OSTI will digitize in the neighborhood of 7,500-10,000 documents annually. * Strategic Repository Management - Unclassified Vault: 900,000 hardcopy documents and 400,000 microfiche - Document Digitization: Mix of in-house efforts and partnerships (DOE sites, INIS, private sector). Advanced scanning technology implementation. Documents are reviewed for sensitivity. - Seeking funds to digitize the complete legacy collection. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 39799d8397 Your first name.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide28 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-12-06 10:12 FY2014-CrossRef FY2014-CrossRef quicktabs Slide28 DOE Plan for Public Access OSTI believes FundRef is a great way for publishers and funding agencies to work together. Research agencies like DOE are accountable for the results of their expenditures to Congress and to the public. Publications in the peer-reviewed literature represent an important output of those expenses, but they have been difficult to track and quantify until now. Public access will expose DOE journal literature to the public Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: f87397cd84f Your first name. Please enable Javascript to use this form.

422

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide24 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-30 07:18 FY2010-cendi-warnick Slide24 ScienceEducation.gov Supporting Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education for America * Begun as a DOE initiative, OSTI partnered with sister organization, the Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) * Broadened project to include other agencies Beta Version opened December 2009 * Provides novel single-query search of STEM education materials from six agencies. * Development of grade stratification by an SBIR awardee is being assessed as one component * Open platform used, inviting participation by teachers to comment, review, and tag resources * Modeled after Science.gov in terms of operation, governance, and search

423

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide13 Submitted by gibsone on Wed, 2013-08-21 11:28 FY2007-etdesouthafrica Slide13 Search Results Shown are a series of search results from several different terms. First there are results from searching on "hydrogen" and "fuel cells," meaning we want to see all these terms appearing in a record. And, you can see we got 9,862 matches. In any of these cases, where I'm showing thousands of matches, it's mainly to illustrate the breadth and volume of the database. Obviously, you would probably want to refine or narrow your search to something more manageable to review what may be relevant to you. Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: e730004e7

424

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide14 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 14:11 FY2009-jordan Slide14 Content Management Is Distributed * NTIS developed the original "catalog" with input from agencies * CENDI Secretariat now maintains catalog with agency participation * Agency content managers submit and edit their information via a web form * Websites identified in the catalog are indexed nightly by USGS * Deep web databases are identified by agencies and reviewed by team for suitability * Real-time search of content in large databases is maintained by OSTI, which hosts the website and serves as operations manager Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 32d2c7d63832d Your first name.

425

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide14 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 13:29 FY2011-Jordan Slide14 Content Management Is Distributed * NTIS developed the original "catalog" with input from agencies * CENDI Secretariat now maintains catalog with agency participation * Agency content managers submit and edit their information via a web form * Websites identified in the catalog were indexed by USGS; now done by OSTI * Deep web databases are identified by agencies and reviewed by team for suitability * Real-time search of content in large databases is maintained by OSTI, which continues to host the website and serve as operations manager Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 7c897bdd7

426

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide20 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 12:51 FY2011-warnick-STIP2011 Slide20 OSTI & Journals: Building Relationships Articles Cited by DOE Labs * OSTI receives some citation information from DOE labs for DOE-sponsored research published in peer-reviewed journals Potential to Collaborate with Publishers * Number of citations for a specific publisher to be analyzed * For example: For Wiley journals, since 2002, approx. 1000 citations reported to OSTI for research published in 165 Wiley journals. * DOIs were obtained from CrossRef for only 50% of the Wiley citations - an area for improvement. * Wiley-OSTI pilot project recently initiated. * Addition of "Funding Agency" as a metadata field is a start. Add new comment Original

427

Microsoft Word - IIP_comments_9.26.2013_final.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PO Box 1253 | Bozeman, MT 59771 PO Box 1253 | Bozeman, MT 59771 Page 1 of 7 September 26, 2013 Julie A. Smith and Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW. Washington, DC 20585 Via e-mail: juliea.smith@hq.doe.gov and christopher.lawrence@hq.doe.gov RE: Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Comments on a Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process Dear Ms. Smith and Mr. Lawrence: On behalf of Jefferson County, Montana, the Western Environmental Law Center, Future West, and the Sonoran Institute, please accept these comments on the draft Integrated, Interagency Pre- Application (IIP) Process. Our entities are uniquely qualified to submit these comments because of our hands-on experience

428

Public Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for Transmission (April 2012) Public Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for Transmission (April 2012) On February 27, 2012, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice seeking information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve multiple Federal, State, local and Tribal authorizations and are subject to a wide array of processes and procedural requirements in order to obtain all necessary permits and other authorizations. Delays in securing required statutory reviews, permits, and consultations can threaten the completion projects of

429

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide16 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 13:34 FY2009-lowg Slide16 WorldWideScience.org * Includes databases/sources from some countries/regions not traditionally well-covered * Has shown tremendous growth from 10 databases and portals from 12 countries to NOW over 40 databases and portals from more than 50 countries. * Includes clustering feature, which groups search results into similar topics, as well as specific date ranges * Machine translation tools to facilitate the addition of non-English sources are under review * Press release is planned this week, China to become latest member Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field) Enter your name: 9f6cf2ac689f6c Your first name.

430

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide07 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 12:51 FY2011-warnick-STIP2011 Slide07 America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 Research results Dissemination Long-term stewardship Digital data Scholarly publications SEC. 103. INTERAGENCY PUBLIC ACCESS COMMITTEE. (a) ESTABLISHMENT.-The Director shall establish a working group under the National Science and Technology Council with the responsibility to coordinate Federal science agency research and policies related to the dissemination and long-term stewardship of the results of unclassified research, including digital data and peer-reviewed scholarly publications, supported wholly, or in part, by funding from the Federal science agencies. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64

431

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide29 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 13:35 FY2009-lowg Slide29 Legislative Update the debate continues * Currently, the NIH Public Access Policy ensures public has access to published results of NIH-funded research * Requires scientists to submit final peer-reviewed journal manuscripts to PubMed Central * Potential for this Policy to extend to other Federal Agencies (open access potential and $$ savings) * If required, DOE has infrastructure in place to implement through the Scientific and Technical Information Program (STIP) * This Policy is under attack; proposed legislation is the Fair Copyright in Research Works Act - Would overturn the NIH policy and make it illegal for other U.S Federal agencies to enact similar policies Add new comment

432

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide12 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-23 06:43 FY2013-APE speeches FY2013-APE Slide12 The FundRef Pilot Goal: To standardize funding information within the body of regular metadata collected by scholarly publications for submission to CrossRef. Publishers Funders American Institute of Physics (AIP) US Department of Energy American Psychological Association (APA) US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Elsevier Science US National Science Foundation IEEE Wellcome Trust Nature Publishing Group Oxford University Press Wiley Specific Task: Add 'agency name' metatag and contract/grant number to CrossRef metadata. Final report/recommendations expected March 2013 Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field)

433

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide18 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-29 13:29 FY2011-Jordan Slide18 Development Milestones * Version 5.0 (Sept 2008) * Clustering of results by subtopics or dates to help target your search * Wikipedia results related to your search terms * EurekaAlert News results related to your search terms * Mark-and-send option to email results to friends and colleagues * More science sources for a more thorough search * Enhanced information related to your real-time search * New look and feel * Updated Alerts Service * Standardized citation formats available for download * Version 5.1 Aggregated news feeds from 11 science agencies * Internships and Fellowships section made searchable * Image Search Library (Coming soon!) Add new comment Original Thumbnail

434

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide09 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-23 07:04 FY2012-OSTI_publishers Slide09 FundRef Project CrossRef Adds 2 New Metadata Elements *OSTI has worked with CENDI (the Federal Scientific and Technical Information Managers Group) members to have a standard list of agencies so there will be no ambiguity for agency names. *The current status of the project is that publishers will work with authors to populate the two new metadata elements. *CrossRef has agreed to add two metadata elements to the CrossRef database which would apply to each journal article. The two metadata elements would capture: *Funding Agency *Grant Number *Estimated completion - 1 year Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field)

435

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide15 Submitted by gibsone on Wed, 2013-08-21 11:19 FY2007-etdeportugal Slide15 ETDE Model - Multilateral Cooperation: * Efficient * Comprehensive * Original "One Stop" Concept The ETDE model, launched 20 years ago, was a single replacement for numerous bilateral exchanges and allowed many countries to submit their energy research and technology information into a common database and then gain access to all other member countries' information. One stream of input, one set of input standards, one output product. Compared to the previous model, this arrangement would properly be characterized as efficient, comprehensive, and an original "one-stop" searching concept. Add new comment Original Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64

436

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide14 Submitted by gibsone on Thu, 2013-08-22 12:07 FY2008-stip speeches FY2008-stip Slide14 OSTI on the Right Track Leveraging technology (e.g. federated search) vs. invoking prescribed standards FY 2007 Report to Congress on Implementation of The E-Government Act of 2002 (Science.gov again recognized) "Science.gov provides search capability across 30 Federal agency R&D databases and provides links to science websites and scientific databases so citizens can access the results of Federal research. In FY 2007 Science.gov experienced 6.5 million search queries across all its scientific databases and 2.6 million page views of its website." Add new comment Thumbnail Mobile_320x340 Icon_64x64 Reply (If you're a human, don't change the following field)

437

METHODOLOGIES FOR REVIEW OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY ASPECTS OF PROPOSED NUCLEAR, GEOTHERMAL, AND FOSSIL-FUEL SITES AND FACILITIES. VOLUME 9 OF THE FINAL REPORT ON HEALTH AND SAFETY IMPACTS OF NUCLEAR, GEOTHERMAL, AND FOSSIL-FUEL ELECTRIC GENERATION IN CALIFORNIA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

quality assurance Standard Review Plan totally dissolvedmore fully in the Standard Review Plan (see Stage 3). Seenuclear power plants: the Standard Review Plan The Nuclear

Nero, A.V.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

ACE Merit Review Report FY2004  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Merit Review and Peer Evaluation of FY 2004 DOE Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL May 18-20, 2004 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program December 2004 Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 13, 2004 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2004 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 18-20, 2004 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were

439

Standards and Test Procedures | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards and Test Procedures Standards and Test Procedures Standards and Test Procedures The Department of Energy (DOE) establishes energy efficiency standards for certain appliances and equipment, and currently covers more than 50 different products. Authority to undertake this effort was granted by Congress, and DOE follows a four phase process when reviewing existing and developing new standards. Each Product page provides information on recent updates, current standards and test procedures, waivers, exceptions, and exemptions, statutory authority, and historical information. For information on current Rulemakings, visit Current Rulemaking and Notices. Consumer Products Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies Ceiling Fans Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Clothes Dryers

440

DOE standard: Radiological control  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Implementation of standards for individual monitoring in Europe  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Table 5. List of standards on QA. Code Title...management-guidelines for quality plans (1995) ISO10007...the ISOIEC 17025 standard, the review shall take into...on: Management review Reports of internal...Radiation protection standards-A global view......

E. Fantuzzi; J. G. Alves; P. Ambrosi; H. Janzekovic; E. Vartiainen

2004-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

March 2007 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2007 March 2007 Continued on next page TSP Manager's Notes 1 Domestic Programs (American National Standards) Overview 2 Aerospace Industry Advocates Standards Selection Based on Technical Merit, Not Semantics 3 Report Recommends Withdrawal of OMB Risk Assessment Bulletin 4 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 5 Topical Committee Developments 6 Welcome Aboard the TSMC! 7 Standards Actions 8 DOE Standards Actions 8

443

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PROGRAM COMMENTS PROGRAM COMMENTS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 529 Program Comments Provided by Reviewers Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Comments Hydrogen Production 1. Was the program area adequately covered? Were important issues and challenges identified? Was progress clearly presented in comparison to the previous year? (Include information presented in the plenary and/or session overview presentations of the program if appropriate.) The Hydrogen Production program area was very well covered-the important issues (including material performance and capital costs for all production pathways) and challenges were clearly described and progress was shown on examples for all research fields (including novel hydrogen production methods)

444

Review Draft Review Draft  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Review Draft Review Draft Columbia Basin White Sturgeon Planning Framework Prepared a favorable review of specific sturgeon projects but noted that an effective basin-wide management plan passage. A planning framework (this document) was drafted based on a review and synthesis of published

445

Public Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012 Public Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study 2012 The Department issued a Federal Register Notice initiating preparations for development of the 2012 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. DOE requested comments on what publicly-available data and information should be considered, and what types of analysis should be performed to identify and understand the significance and character of transmission congestion. The following public comments were received as of March 30, 2012, in response to the 2012 study. DOE appreciates the comments that various individuals and organizations submitted. Comments were received from these organizations, listed alphabetically.

446

Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of of North Dakota Public Service Commissioner Susan Wefald U.S. Department of Energy Transmission Congestion Study Workshop June 18, 2008 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma I am very pleased to have this chance to share thoughts with the U.S. Department of Energy at this Transmission Congestion Study Workshop. I would like to thank the Department for arranging this meeting to provide input on the 2009 study on Electric Transmission Congestion. In this talk, my thoughts represent those of the North Dakota Public Service Commission. As requested, I will be discussing changes in the North Dakota area since 2005 that affect the location, duration, frequency, magnitude, and significance of transmission congestion, including related constraints. In 2005 North Dakota had an export limit around its south and east borders (commonly referred to as NDEX) of about 1,950 MW, which if exceeded can cause

447

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

B-1 B-1 APPENDIX B RELATED INTERNET WEB SITES WHERE CAN I ACCESS ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REFERENCES LISTED IN THIS REFERENCE BOOK? http://www.cfo.doe.gov/policy/actindex/index.html-ssi DOE Accounting Handbook http://www.pr.doe.gov/acqguide.html DOE Acquisition Guide http://www.pr.doe.gov//acqltr.html DOE Acquisition Letters http://www.pr.doe.gov/dear.html DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) http://www.cfo.doe.gov/progliaison/bmop/index.htm DOE Business Management Oversight Process Web Page http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/ DOE Chief Financial Officer Budget Related Information (DOE Budget Call, Budget Formulation Handbook, Principles of Appropriation Law, etc.) http://home.doe.gov/news/releases99/junpr/pr99163.htm DOE Deputy Secretary's Memorandum, of June 25, 1999, on Project Management

448

COMMENTS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and services are transported cost effectively and in a manner which protects property, individuals and the environment. This chapter details the roles and responsibilities of the members of the contract administration team in the transportation, personal property and real property management areas. It also provides

449

COMMENTS  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

procedures, and practices as prescribed in the FPMR and DOE- PMR.; * Planning and scheduling of personal property requirements to ensure that supplies and equipment are...

450

COMMENT  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

CHEMISTRY IN EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTH CARE ... WITH ALL THE RECENT FLAP regarding product liability and corporate integrity, it is no surprise that hospitals in the U.S. can be dangerous places for patients. ...

KENNETH E. BLICK

2003-02-17T23:59:59.000Z

451

September 2004 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16 Cancellation in Progress - 3 Inside This Issue Visit the Technical Standards Program Web Site at http:tis.eh.doe.govtechstds September 2004 The Standards Forum and...

452

ORISE: Inter-rater Reliability brings Standardization to Scientific Peer  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Standardization of Scientific Peer Reviews Standardization of Scientific Peer Reviews IRR: A New Initiative Aims to Bring Standardization to ORISE Scientific Peer Reviews In some peer reviews, clear instructions on the basis for rating proposals may not be given to reviewers. As a result, the reviewers' final ratings can leave much room for interpretation thanks to varying degrees of reviewer knowledge and experience... all of which contribute to the final rating number. For instance, the rating scale for a particular review is 1 to 5 (with 1 being the highest). One reviewer rates the proposal a 2, and a second reviewer rates the same proposal a 4 but notes "this is the best proposal" he's ever seen. If the proposal was the best ever, why didn't he rate the proposal a 1? And, was the range in their scores due

453

Deadline for public comments for the Quadrennial Energy Review...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

energy infrastructure, the QER analyses will consider the impacts of transformations in energy supply, markets, and patterns of end use; issues of aging and capacity; impacts of...

454

COMMENTS OF TENDRIL NETWORKS, INC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy July 12, 2010 Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy in response to the Request for Information "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." We agree with the observation presented in this RFI that access and privacy are complementary goods. We believe that the success of the smart grid will be measured by the degree to which consumers are engaged. In order to become engaged, consumers must have access to the information about real-time conditions, historical usage and underlying prices of energy markets.

455

Toshiba RFI Comments.xlsx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Definition and Scope Definition and Scope Answer/Comment 1 What significant policy challenges are likely to remain unaddressed if we employ Title XIII's definition? The following points are not referencedd in EISA 1301. ・Power provider should also control the output fluctuation of renewable resources. ・The end user should have the choice of which form of power storage to be used. Certain types of energy conservation and storage could work better in different applications (e.g. not only electricity power but also stored thermal energy which is more efficient for some purpose.) 2 If the definition is overly broad, what policy risks emerge as a result? In that case, the budget will be much greater in scale. Certain smart grid investments may not be as cost effective and could get lost in the overall

456

Peer review statement  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.

457

Peer review statement  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.

458

Peer review statement  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.

459

May 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Actions 1 Standards Actions 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2

460

Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Planned Transmission Outages Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Department of Energy Technical Standards Program | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Technical Standards Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Department of Energy Technical Standards Program The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE. Online Standards Approved DOE Technical Standards DOE Technical Standards Archive Monthly Status Reports Subscribe RSS logo Subscribe to receive the latest DOE Approved Technical Standards via an RSS feed. Take Action Write, revise, or maintain a DOE Technical Standard Review a DOE Technical Standard at RevCom for TSP Additional Information Technical Standards Program Information

462

Energy Efficiency Standards and Labels in North America: Opportunities for Harmonization  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Equipment Energy Efficiency Committee. Available fromE. McMahon. 2001. Energy-Efficiency Labels and Standards: ALloyd. 1999. Review of energy efficiency test standards and

Wiel, Stephen

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

The Standards Actions, November 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assessment Criteria, Assessment Criteria, September 1995. * DOS-STD-1032-92, Guide to Good Practices for Operations Organization and Administration, December 1992. * DOE-STD-1045-93, Guide to Good Practices for Notifications and Identification of Abnormal Events, June 1993. * DOE-STD-1061-93, Guide to Technical Standards Program Document Status as of 10/31/95 Projects Initiated The following DOE technical standards projects were recently initiated. If you are interested in participating in the development of these standards, please contact the persons listed below. * DOE-STD-3006-93, Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews, Project No. MISC-0030; Jeffery L. Roberson, DP-31; 301-903- 8026. (Note: This project will revise the standard to conform with the new DOE Orders System. Since this

464

September 2006 Standards Forum/Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2006 September 2006 TSP Manager's Notes 1 TEN YEARS AFTER THE NTTAA: 1996-2006 2 Committee on Nuclear Fuel Cycle Approves Two New Standards 4 Renewable Portfolio Standards Help Wind Industry to Sail 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 5 World Standards Day 2006 in

465

Notices III. Summary of Public Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

32 Federal Register 32 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 246 / Friday, December 21, 2012 / Notices III. Summary of Public Comments Received and Agency Response to Comments During the public comment period provided, EPA received no comments in response to the September 26, 2012 Federal Register notice announcing the Agency's receipt of the requests for voluntary cancellation and termination of all uses of products listed in Table 1 of Unit II. IV. Cancellation Order Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f), EPA hereby approves the requested cancellation and termination of all uses of halofenozide registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II. Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders that the product registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II. are canceled and all uses of halofenozide are terminated. The

466

Microsoft Word - UTC Comments.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of ADDRESSING POLICY AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES TO SMART GRID IMPLEMENTATION ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UTILITIES TELECOM COUNCIL The Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC") is pleased to provide the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. 1 While the RFI raises many important issues for the future development of the Smart Grid, UTC devotes its comments to one issue which Federal policy makers can play a uniquely important role: access to spectrum. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI regarding the communication needs

467

Microsoft Word - vol3-comments.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

i i VOLUME 3 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODOLOGY 1 3. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COMMENTERS 2 4. COMMENTS AND DOE RESPONSES 6 This page intentionally left blank. 1 1. INTRODUCTION The Draft EIS for the Kemper County IGCC Project was published in November 2009. DOE distributed copies of the Draft EIS to officials, agencies, Native American tribes, organizations, libraries, and members of the public identified in the distribution list (Chapter 12 of Draft EIS, Volume 1). DOE announced the notice of avail- ability of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57297); and EPA published the notice of availability in the Federal Register on November 6, 2009 (74 FR 57466). This Volume 3 provides a

468

Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register...

469

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 79 Fed. Reg. 37963 (July 3, 2014).

470

Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Alerts Comments  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Alerts Comments If you have a question about Energy Citations Database Alerts, we recommend you check frequently asked questions. If your question still has not been answered or if...

471

Standard Model Prediction of the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

I review the present Standard Model prediction of the muon anomalous magnetic moment. The discrepancy with its experimental determination is (25.5 +- 8.0) x 10^-10, i.e., 3.2 standard deviations.

Joaquim Prades

2010-02-18T23:59:59.000Z

472

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council Preliminary Review to ISRP comments requested Report Page # 24001 Lake Pend Oreille Predation Research Idaho Fish and Game No and conserve high priority bull and westslope cutthroat trout habitat in Trestle Creek. Idaho Department

473

HEV, PHEV, EV Test Standard Development and Validation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EV Test Standard Development and Validation 2013 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Annual Merit Review May 13-17, 2013 Michael Duoba, Henning Lohse-Busch, Kevin...

474

Better Standards, less Ambiguity  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

iT Helps with Plant Security iT Helps with Plant Security engineers ensure Plant Uptime engineers Building Models Better Standards, less Ambiguity Department of energy on Cyber Security exclusive interview Special Pullout Section Packaging Automation review June 2008 FIFTH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE Among the many initiatives aimed at providing cyber security for the nation's critical infrastructure, the effort that led to a January 2006 document known as the "Roadmap to Secure Control Systems in the Energy Sector" stands out as one involving significant public/private sector collaboration. The Roadmap, which lays out a 10-year vision, has been recommended by the Na- tional Infrastructure Advisory Council as a model for other industries to follow in developing their own sector-specific

475

Standard Model Electroweak Measurements at LEP  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The current status of electroweak physics results from LEP is reviewed. Particular emphasis is placed on the latest results on the properties of the Z and W bosons. The updated status of the global electroweak fit to the standard model and the resulting standard model Higgs mass limits are presented.

F. Spano'

2006-05-19T23:59:59.000Z

476

Reply to comment | OSTI, US Dept of Energy, Office of Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Reply to comment Reply to comment Slide13 Submitted by gibsone on Fri, 2013-08-23 06:43 FY2013-APE speeches FY2013-APE Slide13 The FundRef Workflow FundRef Registry provides standard funder names to publisher manuscript tracking systems. Publishers ask authors to select correct funders and provide grant numbers upon manuscript submission. Funder information transferred to publisher production systems. Publishers send collected funder information in their CrossRef deposits. Funders and other stakeholders query FundRef API: Given funder & grant numbers, return DOIs of publication funded Given DOI, return funder identifiers and grant numbers associated with DOI Funding information displayed on publisher PDFs and websites using standard CrossMark UI. Governance to be determined: Funder Registry*

477

FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

March 2004 FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARD (FIPS) 199, STANDARDS FOR SECURITY Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology A new Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS), recently approved by the Secretary of Commerce, will help federal agencies

478

Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents The purpose of this guidance is to assist EPA reviewers of NEPA documents in providing accurate, realistic, and consistent comments on the assessment of cumulative impacts. The guidance focuses on specific issues that are critical in EPA's review of NEPA documents under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. The guidance offers information on what issues to look for in the analysis, what practical considerations should be kept in mind when reviewing the analysis, and what should be said in EPA comments concerning the adequacy of the analysis. Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents More Documents & Publications

479

EIS-0403: Public Comment Period Extension | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

403: Public Comment Period Extension 403: Public Comment Period Extension EIS-0403: Public Comment Period Extension Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced a two-week extension of the public comment period for the Draft Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Solar PEIS), a joint effort with the Department of Energy. The agencies had previously provided for a 120-day public comment period on the Draft Solar PEIS. Because of numerous requests, the agencies extended the comment period by an additional two weeks beyond April 16, 2011. The comment period ran (with extension) until May 2, 2011. EIS-0403-DEIS_Second_Comment_Extension-2011.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period

480

April 2006 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program Document Status

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "review standards comment" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Final Guidance for Consideration of Environmental Justice in Clean Air Act 309 Reviews  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Environmental Protection Agency document provides guidance on reviewing and commenting on other federal agencies NEPA documents to help ensure that environmental effects on minority and low-income communities have been fully analyzed.

482

(RPP_standards.ps)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 7 10 20 30 40 50 70 100 0.001 0.002 0.005 0.010 0.020 0.050 0.100 0.200 0.500 1.000 Confidence level CL for fits α for confidence intervals 3 4 2 6 8 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 n = 1 χ 2 DEG's Macintosh: Adobe Illus Files/RPP_standards.ps Graphics symbols: 4.25 inches (Sports section) 2.60 inches 3.36 inches (m 1 +m 3 ) 2 10 pt captions 10 pt labels set font basic; set mode vector=off set window x 2 6.5 y 2 5.5 set labels size 1.2 set title size 1.29 set tics size 0.05 4.50 inches (Minireviews) TOPDRAWER template: PARTICLE DATA GROUP NOTES PDG-93-05 10 November 1993 Standards for Adobe Illustrator figures in the Review of Particle Properties

483

AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments Attachment to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments More Documents &...

484

RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and American Public Power Association file these brief reply comments in support of the comments and reply comments filed by the Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC"). Both organizations strongly believe that the Administration should ensure that adequate spectrum is available for internal, utility networks. Integrating Smart Grid technologies into Cooperative and Public Power Systems will necessitate enhanced communications networks. In some instances, Cooperatives and Public Power Systems may choose a commercial provider for at least some portion of their communication network service

485

Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. ("Entergy"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, regarding the current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities. Entergy commented on similar issues in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") during the FCC's development of the National Broadband Plan. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc.

486

October 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Standards Actions 1 Standards Actions 1 New Projects and DOE Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Recently Published 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical Standards Program

487

November 2005 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Technical DOE Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 DOE Technical Standards Revisions 1 Non-Government Standards Actions 1 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association

488

April 2007 Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New Projects and Technical Standards in Revision 1 DOE Technical Standards Posted in RevCom for TSP 1 DOE Technical Standards in Reaffirmation 1 DOE Technical Standards Change Notices 1 Technical Standards Published 2 Non-Government Standards Actions 2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2 ASTM International 2 American Nuclear Society (ANS) 2 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2 DOE Technical

489

DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure DOE Seeks Comment on Application of Clothes Washer Test Procedure June 30, 2010 - 3:02pm Addthis Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a draft interpretative rule clarifying its views on the application of the current residential clothes washer test procedure to machines that offer a warm rinse option that is not included in the recommended cycle for washing cotton or linen clothes. The Department is soliciting feedback from the public on the draft interpretive rule, which is available here, until July 30, 2010. Addthis Related Articles Save Energy and More with ENERGY STAR. ENERGY STAR clothes washers use 50% less energy to wash clothes than standard washing machines. Tips: Laundry DOE Solicits Views on the Implementation of Large-Capacity Clothes Washer

490

September 2005 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page September 2005 Page September 2005 TSP Manager's Notes 1 The Halo Effect: American National Standards and the rest 2 Standards Development for Report- ing of Declarable Substances 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 8 DOE Revises "Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health

491

The Standard Model Beyond the Standard Model  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

physics with top quark Search for Extra-dimensions Conclusions 1 The Standard Model Building block quark Search for Extra-dimensions Conclusions Building block The particles and forces The Standard Model the Standard Model New physics with top quark Search for Extra-dimensions Conclusions Building block

492

December 2006 Standards Forum and Standards Actions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2006 December 2006 TSP Manager's Notes 1 Meeting In The Middle 2 Plain Talk for a New Generation 3 Licensing New Nuclear Power Plants 4 ANSI Government Affairs Overview 5 Technical Standards Manager Spotlight 7 Topical Committee Developments 8 Welcome Aboard the TSMC! 8 Standards Actions 9 DOE Standards Actions 9

493

Independent External Peer Review Report Wood River 19 August 2011 ii  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Wood River 19 August 2011 ii Table of Contents List.3 Preparation and Charge for Peer Review Panel 6 3.4 Performing the IEPR 7 3.5 Preparation of Comments and Panel IEPR Process 5 Figure 3. IEPR Team 9 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Wood River 19 August

US Army Corps of Engineers

494

Independent External Peer Review Report Green Bay 20 June 2011 ii  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

#12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Green Bay 20 June 2011 ii Table of Contents List for Peer Review Panel 6 3.4 Performing the IEPR 7 3.5 Preparation of Comments and Panel Consensus Process 4 Figure 3. IEPR Team 9 #12;Independent External Peer Review Report ­ Green Bay 20 June 2011 iii

US Army Corps of Engineers

495

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program has posted the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, which summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR) held June 1620, 2014, in Washington, D.C.

496

Cohen_DoE comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Claude R. Canizares Claude R. Canizares Vice President for Research and Associate Provost Bruno Rossi Professor of Physics 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 3-234 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307 Phone 617-253-3206 Fax 617-253-3193 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY March 18, 2011 Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency US Department of Energy Office of General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington DC 20585 SUBEJCT: Reducing Regulatory Burden - EO 13563 Retrospective Review Dear Mr. Cohen: We are encouraged that President Obama has asked the federal agencies to conduct this retrospective review of existing rules to assess which should be maintained, modified,

497

Appendix to ISAB and ISRP Review of the Salmonid Field Protocols Handbook (ISAB&ISRP 2007-5)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Appendix to ISAB and ISRP Review of the Salmonid Field Protocols Handbook (ISAB&ISRP 2007-5) Specific Comments on Handbook Sections and Field Protocols Comments are given under the titles of the respective chapters, as outlined below. The page on which each chapter starts in the Handbook is also

498

Interconnection Standards | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Interconnection Standards Interconnection Standards Interconnection Standards < Back Eligibility Commercial Fed. Government Industrial Local Government Nonprofit Residential Schools State Government Savings Category Bioenergy Commercial Heating & Cooling Manufacturing Buying & Making Electricity Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Water Wind Energy Sources Solar Program Info State Ohio Program Type Interconnection Provider Ohio Public Utilities Commission '''''Note: In July 2012, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) opened a docket ([http://dis.puc.state.oh.us/CaseRecord.aspx?CaseNo=12-2051&x=0&y=0 Case 12-0251-EL-ORD]) to review the net metering and interconnection rules for investor-owned utilities. Details will be posted as more information is available.'''''

499

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ceiling Fans Ceiling Fans Sign up for e-mail updates on regulations for this and other products The Department of Energy (DOE) has had the authority to regulate the energy efficiency level of ceiling fan since 2005. A ceiling fan is a "nonportable device that is suspended from a ceiling for circulating air via the rotation of fan blades" (42 U.S.C. 6291(49)). The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) amended the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA) setting standards for ceiling fans. DOE will conduct an analysis of energy, emission and cost reductions when it reviews these standards in future rulemakings. Recent Updates | Standards | Test Procedures | Waiver, Exception, and Exemption Information | Statutory Authority | Historical Information | Contact Information

500

DOE Technical Standards Program Standards Actions Newsletter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

* * New DOE Standard, Communicating Waste Characterization and DOT Hazard Classification Requirements * Workshops and Events * The Annual Energy Facility Contractors Group Safety Analysis Workshop * 2012 Chemical Safety and Life Cycle Management Workshop * Nuclear Safety- Related Standards Activity INSIDE THIS ISSUE April 2012 Standards Actions Technical Standards Program Newsletter www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ New DOE Standard, Communicating Waste Characterization and DOT Hazard Classification Requirements The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has a challenging mission to solve many problems posed by the legacy of the Cold War, including the transportation of unprecedented amounts of contaminated waste,