National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for review comment temporal

  1. Regulatory Review Comment Section | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment » Regulatory Review Comment Section Regulatory Review Comment Section DOE Comments on Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste

  2. Review comments from 2004 ATD Annual Review

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Report on the Annual Review of the FY 2005 Advanced Technology Development Program [pic] August 9 & 10, 2005 Argonne IL November 2005 U.S. Department of Energy Office of FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies High Power Energy Storage Program November 3, 2005 Dear Colleague: This document is a summary of the evaluation and comments provided by the review panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Technology Development (ATD) program annual review. The review was held at the

  3. Comments to DOE QER Quadrennial Energy Review:

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    to DOE QER Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on the Public Meeting ''Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency'' Remarks of Duane D. Highley Washington, DC April 11, 2014 Introduction:  Thank you for inviting me to participate in this important discussion today. My name is Duane Highley, and I am the President, CEO and Chief Affordability Officer for the Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. (AECC), a non-profit, member-owned power supply cooperative serving 2/3 of the land mass in Arkansas, and

  4. Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. PDF icon Fourth

  5. ESPC Project Review Comment Template | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Review Comment Template ESPC Project Review Comment Template Template for project facilitator review of the preliminary assessment, investment-grade audit, commissioning plan, and other energy service company deliverables for an energy savings performance contract (ESPC). File p3-03review_comments_7.docx More Documents & Publications FEMP ESPC Project Development Resource Guide ESPC ENABLE ACQUISITION PLAN TEMPLATE Project Facilitation and Quality Assurance for Federal ESPCs

  6. Review comments from 2004 ATD Annual Review

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... One reviewer questioned the empirical models, asking how the DSM model compares to the t1... Accelerated Aging at ANL, I. Bloom -- WS 75.7, Rank 11 Relevance to overall DOEFCVT ...

  7. DOE Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments DOE Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded or repealed. PDF icon

  8. SPEAR3 Mini-Lehman Review Committee Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9, 2001 SPEAR3 Mini-Lehman Review Comments on Technical Systems Main magnet designs have been completed. Prototype dipole, quadrupole and sextupole magnets meet design...

  9. RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF PDF icon RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF More Documents & Publications Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI

  10. MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energys (DOEs) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that...

  11. Deadline for public comments for the Quadrennial Energy Review is October 10

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The October 10 deadline for public comments for the first installment of the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER) is coming up soon. We want to hear from you, so please submit a comment. The Department...

  12. WACC-WTG Review Comment Sheets

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Spencer, W.A.

    1991-04-02

    This report is a letter about a review of the ``Quality Assurance Project Plan for the INEL Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Waste Characterization Project.`` The author of the letter recommended the approval of the quality assurance program. However in his review, several observations were made and were requested to be added to the program. Examples of these observations were safety of personnel involved in the program, safe characterization of hazardous materials studied, quality of calibrations required for measurement objectives, and reporting of hazardous sampling. (MB)

  13. WACC-WTG Review Comment Sheets

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Spencer, W.A.

    1991-04-02

    This report is a letter about a review of the Quality Assurance Project Plan for the INEL Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Waste Characterization Project.'' The author of the letter recommended the approval of the quality assurance program. However in his review, several observations were made and were requested to be added to the program. Examples of these observations were safety of personnel involved in the program, safe characterization of hazardous materials studied, quality of calibrations required for measurement objectives, and reporting of hazardous sampling. (MB)

  14. CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments

  15. Fourth RFI_Comment on Regulatory Review.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    47328 Vol. 77, No. 153 Wednesday, August 8, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties

  16. Notice and Request for OMB Review and Comment: Federal Register...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    and Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 250 - Dec. 31, 2014 The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability has submitted an information collection...

  17. EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    NM. For more information on this project, see the project webpage: http:energy.govnode299815. Download Document EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment...

  18. EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    (Dec. 5, 2011) | Department of Energy EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. PDF icon

  19. Comments

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Comments by the Energy Storage Association to the Department of Energy Electricity Advisory Council March 13, 2014 Good afternoon. My name is Katherine Hamilton and I serve as Policy Director for the Energy Storage Association, an international trade association that was established over 20 years ago to foster the development of energy storage technologies. Since then our mission has been the promotion, development and commercialization of competitive and reliable energy storage delivery systems

  20. Appendix Table of Contents Appendix I: Detailed Reviewer Comments...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... This type of methodology could be widely applied in ... Technologies Office Peer Review Report - Appendices ... 10, did not provide engineering, design, materials, equipment ...

  1. Microsoft Word - Final Quadrennial Energy Review Comments, Providence - DePasquale, Scott.docx

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on the New England Regional Infrastructure Constraints Public Meeting" (Part 1 - Providence, RI) Scott DePasquale - Chairman and CEO, Utilidata Good morning ladies and gentlemen and thank you for giving me the opportunity to present to you today. My name is Scott DePasquale and I am the Chairman and CEO of Providence-based Utilidata. My company specializes in equipment and software that allows utility companies to better automate and manage their power

  2. EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and Comment Period and

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Announcement of an Additional Public Hearing | Department of Energy Draft Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement DOE has extended the comment period for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemential EIS through October 10 and announces an additional Public Hearing in Espanola, NM. For more information on this project, see the project webpage: http://energy.gov/node/299815. Download Document PDF icon EIS-0283-S2: Notice of Extension of Public Review and

  3. AHAM Comments_DOE Reg Review Sept 2012_FINAL.pdf

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    September 7, 2012 By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). AHAM

  4. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix T (Second Continued Volume): Comments & Responses.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    This is Appendix T (second continued volume) giving public comments and responses to the final environmental impact statement for the Columbia River System.

  5. QER- Comment of Northeast Gas Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find enclosed comments of the Northeast Gas Association regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review. Thank you.

  6. QER- Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting “Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency,” Held April 11, 2014, - Please provide link to where public comments are available.

  7. Submit a Public Comment on The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) External Merit Review Meeting Summary

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) Initiative within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is a multi-year DOE research initiative targeting significant reductions in the cost of wind energy through an improved understanding of the complex physics of the wind resource and interaction with wind farms. DOE is now accepting public comments on the meeting summary for the A2e Initiative. DOE held an A2e External Merit Review in Washington, DC, on February 4-5, 2014. The External Review Panel reviewed the current program planning and provided suggestions on the formulation of A2e strategy, goals and implementation approaches.

  8. QER- Comment of Bridger LLC

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attn: Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Task Force: Please find attached written comments by Bridger LLC for the Quadrennial Energy Review Report.

  9. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. The public comments on the Draft WIR Evaluation were submitted to...

  10. QER- Comment of Elaine Mroz

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Elaine Mroz Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on the Public Meetings Infrastructure Restraints- New England held April 21, 2014, in Providence, RI and Hartford, CT. Please see attached file.

  11. EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. PDF icon RegReview...

  12. Total energy cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Volume 4: peer review comments on technical report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-01-01

    This report compares the energy use, oil use and emissions of electric vehicles (EVs) with those of conventional, gasoline-powered vehicles (CVs) over the total life cycle of the vehicles. The various stages included in the vehicles` life cycles include vehicle manufacture, fuel production, and vehicle operation. Disposal is not included. An inventory of the air emissions associated with each stage of the life cycle is estimated. Water pollutants and solid wastes are reported for individual processes, but no comprehensive inventory is developed. Volume IV includes copies of all the external peer review comments on the report distributed for review in July 1997.

  13. Comprehensive Summary and Analysis of Oral and Written Scoping Comments on the Hawaii Geothermal Project EIS (DOE Review Draft)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1992-09-18

    This report contains summaries of the oral and written comments received during the scoping process for the Hawaii Geothermal Project (HGP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Oral comments were presented during public scoping meetings; written comments were solicited at the public scoping meetings and in the ''Advance Notice of Intent'' and ''Notice of Intent'' (published in the ''Federal Register'') to prepare the HGP EIS. This comprehensive summary of scoping inputs provides an overview of the issues that have been suggested for inclusion in the HGP EIS.

  14. QER- Comment of Berkshire Environmental Action Team

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear members of the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force, Please find attached comments from the Berkshire Environmental Action Team, Inc. (BEAT) regarding the proposed natural gas pipeline expansion. Thank you for considering our comments.

  15. Full Reviews: Seismicity and Seismic

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Below are the project presentations and respective peer reviewer comments for Seismicity and Seismic.

  16. The EIS Comment-Response Process | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS. PDF icon The EIS Comment-Response Process More

  17. DOE Extends Comment Period for Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy today announces an extension of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review...

  18. Quadrennial Energy Review comments

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    up overnight. This same growth can be seen in Basin Electric's load forecast as well. (2 nd slide) The graph demonstrates the significant growth associated with the Bakken. Basin...

  19. QER- Comment of Office of Franklin County Commissioner Paula Brooks

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please see the attached comments from Franklin County, Ohio Commissioner Paula Brooks on the Quadrennial Energy Review.

  20. QER- Comment of Michael Kirkwood

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please accept the attached comments from Pascoag Utility District regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review process. Out comments focus on the difficulty with our current RTO market structure and its lack of providing appropriate cost-effective solutions to our energy infrastructure needs in New England.

  1. QER- Comment of Institute for Energy Research

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Institute for Energy Research would like to submit a comment for the DOE's Quadrennial Energy Review. You will find the comment attached, and we would like to be listed as: Institute for Energy Research 1155 15th St Nw, Suite 1900 Washington, D.C. 20005 Thank you for the opportunity to comment!

  2. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find AGA's comments relating to critical issues facing the natural gas distribution industry, which we believe could be usefully addressed in the first phase of the DOE Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). Our comments as submitted here consist of a cover letter and four additional attachments. My colleague Pam Lacey has previously submitted AGA's comments relating to methane emissions under separate cover.

  3. Zero Zone Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Zero Zone Comment Zero Zone Comment These comments are submitted by Zero Zone Inc., a manufacturer of CRE equipment, in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. PDF icon Zero Zone comments More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI Executive Order 13563 certification, compliance and

  4. CEQ Extends Comment Period on Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    in NEPA Reviews CEQ Extends Comment Period on Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews February 20, ...

  5. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2009) Customer Comments on 2009 PTSA Avista Utilities BPA Power Services Grant County PUD Horizon Wind Energy Iberdrola Renewables Northwest Requirements Utilities Powerex...

  6. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Service Customer Comments Customer Response to July 24August 8 Forums N.Wasco County PUD (08262013) Portland General Electric (08262013) Renewable Northwest Project (0826...

  7. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Customer Comments BPA Power (452012) Clark PUD (452012) Cowlitz PUD (452012) Emerald PUD (452012) Franklin PUD (452012) Grant PUD (452012) Iberdrola (452012)...

  8. Public Comments Received on the Draft Congestion Study | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Public Comments Received on the Draft Congestion Study Public Comments Received on the Draft Congestion Study On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The draft study is available for review and downloading. The public comment period closed on October 20, 2014. Comments are available through the links below, as of October 20, 2014. Click on the

  9. National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    August 2014 | Department of Energy - Draft for Public Comment August 2014 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment August 2014 On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The draft study is available below for review and downloading. The public comment period closed on October 20, 2014. Comments have been posted online.

  10. AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments Regulatory Burden RFI AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). PDF icon AHAM Comments_DOE Reg Review Sept 2012_FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment AHAM Retrospective Preliminary

  11. DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments Regulatory Burden RFI DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI These comments are submitted by Rheem Manufacturing Company in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information on existing regulations that should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. PDF icon Reg_Review_DOE_comts_RFI.pdf More Documents & Publications Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third

  12. Page comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    with-serial-codes-on-login-nodesPageComment101 http:www.nersc.govuserssoftwarecompilersintel-fortran-c-and-cintel-bug-reportsintel-uses-very-old-version-of-libstdc-by-de...

  13. COMMENTS | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    COMMENTS� COMMENTS� PDF icon COMMENTS� More Documents & Publications COMMENTS� CHAPTER 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Microsoft Word - Appendix A_2006_Jun

  14. DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    - Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 Updated 4/9/2012 DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE received comments on the draft DOE Challenge Home specifications and requirements from December 15, 2011 through January 31, 2012. This document summarizes the comments received, DOE's responses, and the resulting policy change, if any. All comments were reviewed. Similar comments were grouped together in the responses.

  15. DOE responses to Ecology review comments for ``Sampling and analysis plans for the 100-D Ponds voluntary remediation project``

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    NONE

    1996-12-31

    The Sampling and Analysis Plan describes the sampling and analytical activities which will be performed to support closure of the 100-D Ponds at the Hanford Reservation. This report contains responses by the US Department of Energy to Ecology review for ``Sampling and Analysis Plan for the 100-D Ponds Voluntary Remediation Project.``

  16. QER- Comment of American Hydrogen Northeast, Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Sir or Madam, Attached please find the Hydrogen Association and the American Hydrogen Northeast,inc's Comments on the first round of QER review. I wish to thank Secretary Moniz and Senator Reed for attending the Providence hearing and providing this opportunity to submit these comments.

  17. QER- Comment of Canadian Electricity Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Ms. Pickett and/or DOE staff: Attached please find comments of the Canadian Electricity Association (CEA) on the Quadrennial Energy Review. Please confirm receipt at your convenience and please advise if you require anything further. Many thanks for this opportunity to provide comments. Best regards,

  18. QER- Comment of Process Gas Consumer Group

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Attached are comments offered by the Process Gas Consumers Group in response to the August 25, 2014 Federal Register Notice soliciting comments on issues related to the Quadrennial Energy Review. Please let us know if you have any questions or would like any additional information.

  19. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find AGA's comments on methane emissions issues in the first phase of the DOE Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), consisting of a cover letter and attachments. Dr. Kathryn Clay will be submitting AGA's comments on other aspects of the QER. Please let me know if you have any questions.

  20. QER- Comment of American petroleum Institute (API)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached API's comments (and associated attachments) to the Department of Energy's Public Comment on the Quadrennial Energy Review [79 FR 50638, Doc. No. 2014-20114]. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or need anything else.

  1. The EIS Comment-Response Process (DOE, 2004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS.

  2. QER- Comment of Electric Power Supply Association 3

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find the attached comments of the Electric Power Supply Association on the Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review due October 10, 2014. Respectfully submitted,

  3. QER- Comment of Electric Power Supply Association 1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find the attached comments of the Electric Power Supply Association on the Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review due October 10, 2014. Respectfully submitted,

  4. QER- Comment of Electric Power Supply Association 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find the attached comments of the Electric Power Supply Association on the Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review due October 10, 2014. Respectfully submitted,

  5. QER- Comment of Electric Power Supply Association 4

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find the attached comments of the Electric Power Supply Association on the Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review due October 10, 2014.

  6. QER - Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Honda Motor Co., Inc. QER - Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc. From: Edward_Cohen@hna.honda.com Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:42 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting _&Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency,_8 Held April 11, 2014, Washington, D.C. filed by American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Attachment: QER Comments 6.10.2014.pdf Attached please find comments for the record for the Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting

  7. Public Comments Submitted by E-mail | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Public Comments Submitted by E-mail Public Comments Submitted by E-mail In order to gather information and recommendations for the Quadrennial Energy Review, EPSA solicited comments from stakeholders and the general public. The public comments are located on this page and can be sorted by heading, searched by topic using the tags below, or by entering search terms in the search field. Tags EPSA QER Downloads Page Title Name of Organization Name of Submitter Tags

  8. Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third RFI Comment Extension |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy RFI Comment Extension Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third RFI Comment Extension This notice announces that the period for submitting comments on the Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' is extended to June 19, 2012. PDF icon ReducRegBurden_EO_13563_Third_RFI_Comt_ Ext.pdf More Documents & Publications Fourth RFI Comment on

  9. Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment March 15, 2013 - 11:08am Addthis Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment DOE has issued the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (ULP PEIS)(DOE/EIS-0472D) for public review and comment. The document is available here and on the ULP PEIS website. Under the

  10. QER - Comment of Energy Storage Association | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Storage Association QER - Comment of Energy Storage Association From: Katherine Hamilton [katherine@38northsolutions.com] on behalf of Katherine Hamilton [k.hamilton@energystorage.org] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 4:37 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Comments from Energy Storage Association Attachment: ESA QER Comments10 10 14FINAL.pdf; ATT00001.htm Attached please find comments from the Energy Storage Association on the Department of Energy's Quadrennial Energy Review. Thank you for the

  11. DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is

  12. QER- Comment of Bay Area Biosolids to Energy Coalition (BAB2E)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please Accept the attached written comments as submitted to the: Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on Public Meeting "Water-Energy Nexus, June 19, 2014, Washington DC Please let me know that you received the comments and that they will be put on the record for this comment period Thank You Paul

  13. QER- Comment of Cloud Peak Energy Inc

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Ms Pickett Please find attached comments from Cloud Peak Energy as input to the Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review. If possible I would appreciate a confirmation that this email has been received Thank you.

  14. QER- Comment of Marcellus Shale Coalition

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the Marcellus Shale Coalitions comments with regard to the U.S. Department of Energys Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Hearing - Natural Gas Transmission, Storage and Distribution. Thank you

  15. QER- Comment of Husch Blackwell LLP

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good afternoon, Today, WIRES (www.wiresgroup.com) is submitting the attached communication to the United States Secretary of Energy pertaining to the Quadrennial Energy Review. Your comments are welcome and can be sent to me.

  16. QER- Comment of Southern Company

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Southern Company Services, Inc., as agent for Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company, (collectively, “Southern Companies”), are pleased to hereby provide their comments to the Department of Energy as it prepares the Quadrennial Energy Review. If there is anything else that we can do in this regard, please feel free to contact us.

  17. QER- Comment of Mitsubishi Electric

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Karen: On behalf of Brian Heery, president and CEO of Mitsubishi Electric Power Products, attached are comments regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review. As a US-based manufacturer of large transformers and other energy infrastructure technologies, we welcome the opportunity to meet with you on issues affecting the Nations transmission grid.

  18. COMMENTS | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    COMMENTS� COMMENTS� PDF icon COMMENTS� More Documents & Publications CHAPTER 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc

  19. QER - Comment of Canadian Hydropower Association | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Canadian Hydropower Association QER - Comment of Canadian Hydropower Association From: Pierre Lundahl [lundap@me.com] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:13 PM To: QERcomments CC: Jacob Irving Subject: Quadrennial Energy Review Comments Attachment: page2image18720.png; ATT00001.htm; Canadian Hydropower Association QER Submission_Oct-10-2014-Final.pdf; ATT00002.htm Dear DOE, You will find attached the comments of the Canadian Hydropower Association on the Quadriennal Energy Review. Inquiries about

  20. QER- Comment of Lisa Petrie

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To Whom it May Concern: Attached please find my comments for the Quadrennial Energy Review. I attended the meeting and gave the comments orally, but I wasn't able to finish because of the 3-minute time limit, so I'm sending them in written form (with a couple of very small revisions). I'd also like to say that I was disappointed to find that the meeting was poorly publicized, that very few members of the general public or the environmental community were present, and that there were no environmentalists or opponents of the proposed AIM pipeline expansion project among the formal speakers. I sincerely hope that future hearings will be more balanced, in keeping with this Administration's promise of transparent government that's responsive to the needs and concerns of its citizens. Thank you so much for taking the time to read and consider my comments. Respectfully Yours, Lisa Petrie Stay-at-home mom and concerned citizen

  1. Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Now Available for Public Comment

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy has issued a Notice of Public Comment in the Federal Register, inviting the public to comment on the draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. The draft study is now available for review and downloading at http://www.energy.gov/node/942311. The public comment period will close on October 20, 2014. After reviewing and considering comments on the draft study, the Department will prepare and release a final version of the study.

  2. Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Review Scoping Document and Process...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    workgroups, please let BPA know in your submitted comments. I. Overview and Timeline The "Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Review" (Review) is a public process to review and consider...

  3. Power Function Review (pbl/rates)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    PFR Public Comments Firstgov Power Function Review (PFR) Summary: This area of the Power Services web site provides information related to the Power Function Review (PFR). The PFR...

  4. Energy Storage - Advanced Technology Development Merit Review...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Advanced Technology Development Merit Review Energy Storage - Advanced Technology Development Merit Review This document is a summary of the evaluation and comments provided by the ...

  5. Review of studies of research opportunities in energy conservation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hane, G.J.; Williams, T.A.; Hauser, S.G.

    1984-04-01

    This study attempted to systematically identify, screen and review many of the 27 remaining major studies across the end-use areas. The method used to identify and review the studies, the scope of this effort, the types of studies reviewed, and the R and D opportunities identified are discussed. The actual report reviews are included. The review format and the kinds of information sought from each report are discussed. The general categories of the material are described; the types of information presented are summarized; and gaps in the literature are discussed. A discussion of R and D needs and comments of the specific needs presented and their temporal and evolutionary characteristics are included. The findings of the review are summarized and the researchers contacted for information are listed.

  6. Full Reviews: Analysis and Education | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Analysis and Education Full Reviews: Analysis and Education Below are the project presentations and respective peer reviewer comments for Analysis and Education. Geothermal Electricity Technology Evaluation Model (GETEM) Development Greg Mines, Idaho National Laboratory Project Presentation | Peer Reviewer Comments National Geothermal Student Competition Charlie Visser and Tom Williams, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Project Presentation | Peer Reviewer Comments Geothermal Power Generation

  7. QER- Comment of Sempra Energy 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sempra Energy, on behalf of its subsidiaries, San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E), Southern California Gas Company, (SoCalGas) and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power1, respectfully submit the attached comments to the Department of Energy. The attached document provides Sempra Energy’s comments regarding the U.S. Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy review meeting on natural gas transmission, storage and distribution.

  8. QER- Comment of Sempra Energy 1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sempra Energy, on behalf of its subsidiaries, San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E), Southern California Gas Company, (SoCalGas) and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, respectfully submit the attached comments to the Department of Energy. The attached document provides Sempra Energy’s comments regarding the U.S. Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy review meeting on electricity transportation, distribution and storage in the west.

  9. QER Public Meeting No. 5 Written Comments of SMUD

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    No. 5 Written Comments of SMUD Page 1 of 6 Quadrennial Energy Review Department of Energy Public Meeting No. 5 Electricity Transmission, Storage and Distribution - West July 11, 2014 Written Comments of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) appreciates the opportunity to provide its written comments in connection with the July 11, 2014 public meeting conducted by the Department of Energy (DOE) addressing "Electricity Transmission, Storage

  10. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation To provide greater transparency to the Department of Energy's (DOE) cleanup of nuclear legacy waste, DOE made the "West Valley Demonstration Project Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the Vitrification Melter" (Draft WIR Evaluation) available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory

  11. Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. PDF icon DOE Reg Burden

  12. QER - Comment of Information Technology Industry Council 1 | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy 1 QER - Comment of Information Technology Industry Council 1 From: Hankin, Chris [chankin@itic.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 8:32 AM To: QERcomments CC: Steve Crout; Welsh, Peggy; Pickett, Adonica (Renee) Subject: QER -- Comments of the Information Technology Industry Council Attachment: DOEQERITIcomments2014.pdf All: Please find attached the comments of the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) to assist in the Department's Quadrennial Energy Review. The contacts as

  13. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 | Department of Energy Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29,

  14. Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 | Department of Energy Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 Extension of Comment Period on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 186 - September 25, 2013 On August 29,

  15. Public Comments on the proposed 10 CFR Part 51 rule for renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses and supporting documents: Review of concerns and NRC staff response. Appendices

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-05-01

    This volume contains several appendices. Appendix A contains the list of individuals and organizations providing comments at various stages of the rulemaking process. The names of commenters at the public meetings are listed in the order that they spoke at the meeting; those who submitted written comments are listed by docket number. Appendix B contains the summaries of comments made. Each comment summary is identified by a unique comment number. Appendix C presents the concerns and NRC staff responses. Each concern embodies one or more comments on similar or related issues. The associated comment numbers are referenced for each concern. The concerns are organized by topic areas. A three-letter identifier for the topic, followed by a number, is assigned to each concern.

  16. Comment Period Closed Explained

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The public comment period on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has ended, and DOE is preparing a Final EIS. The Final EIS will consider and respond to all timely public comments on the...

  17. QER- Comment of WIRES

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the components of WIRES Comment to the QER. Please direct any questions to Jim Hoecker, below.

  18. TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PurposeThis procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process.

  19. Submitting Comments via Email

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Submitting Comments via Email Any contact information provided in your e-mail submission will not be publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). Your contact information will be publicly viewable if you include it in the comment itself or in any documents attached to your comment. Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to

  20. QER- Comment of America's Wetland Foundation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you for the opportunity to make oral remarks on behalf of the America¹s WETLAND Foundation in New Orleans on May 27, 2014 during the public comment period at the meeting held by the U.S. Department of Energy as the Secretariat for the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). In follow up, attached is a summation of those comments, along with three reports released by the Foundation for your review that will provide information helpful to the committee. Please do not hesitate to contact me if there are questions or if more information is desired, Sidney Coffee

  1. 30 TAC, part 1, chapter 116, rule 116.136 Public Comment Procedures...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    This rule explains the public comment procedures for new source review permits for air quality control in Texas. Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 1993 Legal Citation...

  2. QER - Comment of Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 2 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 2 QER - Comment of Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 2 From: Hatch, Maryanne [Mhatch@eei.org] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 5:02 PM To: QERcomments Cc: Ingram, Tony; Hatch, Maryanne Subject: Second Set of Comments of Edison Electric Institute Attachment: Edison Electric Institue Comments and Resources- QER - FINAL.pdf Good evening, Please find the Second Set of Comments of the Edison Electric Institute on the Quadrennial Energy Review attached. Thank you for the

  3. From: Jay Caspary To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Meyer, David; Lanny Nickell

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Jay Caspary To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Meyer, David; Lanny Nickell Subject: SPP Staff Comments on DOE Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 4:32:04 PM Attachments: Draft Comments by SPP Staff regarding the DOE Draft Congestion Study rev.docx Importance: High SPP staff offers the attached comments for your review and consideration. Please verify receipt and don't hesitate to contact me with any questions or remarks. Take care... Jay Caspary Director - Research, Development &

  4. QER - Comment of Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 1 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    QER - Comment of Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 1 QER - Comment of Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 1 From: Hatch, Maryanne [Mhatch@eei.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:41 PM To: QERcomments CC: Ingram, Tony; Graham, Randall; Jahn, Louis; Fama, Jim Subject: Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on the Public Meeting "Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency" Attachment: Edison Electric Institue Comments and Resources- QER - Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency FINAL.pdf To: Office of Energy

  5. QER- Comment of Alaska Department of Natural Resources

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To Whom It May Concern: Attached please find the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources’ official comments on the Quadrennial Energy Review being conducted by the Department of Energy pursuant to Presidential Memorandum of January 9, 2014.

  6. QER- Comment of National Association of State Energy Officials

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached for submission the Comments from the National Association of State Energy Officials on the Quadrennial Energy Review. Please confirm receipt of this email and the attachment for filing, thank you very much. Sincerely,

  7. QER - Comment of Environmental Law & Policy Center | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Stephanie Chase SChase@elpc.org Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 6:02 PM To: QERcomments Cc: Mindi Schmitz; Jennifer Tarr Subject: ELPC Comments on the Quadrennial Energy Review...

  8. QER- Comment of Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To whom it may concern: Please find attached comments from the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Association on the Quadrennial Energy Review. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me.

  9. Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Multi Canister Overpack (MCO) Design Review Completion Report - section 1 and 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    GOLDMANN, L.H.

    1999-11-30

    This document summarizes the design reviews performed on the Multi-Canister Overpack and includes multiple appendices containing the Review Comment Record forms for each design review.

  10. Vehicle Technologies Office Publishes 2014 Annual Merit Review...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    reviewers provide numeric scores and meaningful comments to create a comprehensive project report card. The recommendations from the reviewers are taken into consideration by DOE...

  11. Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Program Publications Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports These reports summarize the comments of expert peer ...

  12. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 3

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Ms. Pickett: Attached please find AGA's comments on natural gas vehicle fueling infrastructure as part of our response to the first phase of the DOE Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), consisting of a cover letter and attachments. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn Clay

  13. QER- Comment of ISO New England, Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find comments from ISO New England President & CEO Gordon van Welie on the US Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review. If you are unable to open or access the attached PDF for whatever reason, please contact me at the number below. Thank you,

  14. CRA Comments & Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CRA Comments & Responses Home CRA - 2004 Final Recertification Decision CRA Comments & Responses CCA - 1996 CRA CARDs & TSDs CCA CARDs & TSDs Regulatory Tools Completeness Determination-Related Correspondence All EPA & DOE correspondence related to the determination of completeness and the CRA are provided below. Letter Transmitting EPA's CRA Completeness Determination (9/29/05) Notification of Completeness Determination EPA Letter # Subject 1 CRA Comments (5/20/04)

  15. CRA Comments & Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (51105) 11 Response to CRA Comments (92005) Enclosure 1 - Computer Code VerificationTesting (92005) Inventory and Performance Assessment Reports DOE - Performance...

  16. Reliability Question Comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Reliability-Question-Comment Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives...

  17. DOE Seeks Comments on its Preliminary Plan to Reduce Regulatory Burden |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Comments on its Preliminary Plan to Reduce Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Comments on its Preliminary Plan to Reduce Regulatory Burden July 13, 2011 - 2:02pm Addthis The Department of Energy issued a notice seeking comment on its Preliminary Plan to implement Executive Order 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review". The plan describes how the Department intends to conduct retrospective review of its regulations. The Department developed its Preliminary

  18. QER- Comment of Natural Gas Supply Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    TO: Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force In response to the Department of Energy’s August 25, 2014 Federal Register Notice seeking input on the Quadrennial Energy Review, attached are comments from the Natural Gas Supply Association. Thank you for this opportunity to share our views on the important issue of energy infrastructure. If we can be of further assistance, please let me know. Regards,

  19. Appendix C - Comments and Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    according to comment categories. In compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and Council on Environmental Quality regulations, public comments on...

  20. QER- Comment of Jerry Toenyes

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), specifically the water/energy nexus. Unfortunately there is little relationship between water operations and power generation in decisions involving the Federal hydropower facilities located in California. Power is the lowest priority of the various project purposes met by the Federal projects and does not receive consideration in short term and long term planning. Water only flows through Federal power plants while it is being released by the dams to meet other project purposes.

  1. Berkeley Lab Research Review Magazine Index

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Research Review Magazine A-Z Index Search Phone Book Comments Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Public Information Department News Archive Listing by Subject...

  2. Join a Regional Stakeholder Quadrennial Energy Review Meeting Near You

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please consider participating in an upcoming meeting and or submitting your entity's priorities and comments in to the record at public comment at an upcoming Quadrennial Energy Review (QER)...

  3. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the

  4. Dairyland Power Cooperative comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    comments Dairyland Power Cooperative comments Response comments from Dairyland Power Cooperative on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logisitical Reliability PDF icon...

  5. Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures In response to an application, any person may file a protest, comments, or a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as...

  6. Summary of Written Public Comments Part 1: Letters Concerning NETL

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Written Public Comments Part 1: Letters Concerning NETL Email received from Kenny Purdue and Joshua Sword, AFL-CIO Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories Re: Comments on the CRENEL Draft Final Report On behalf of the 70,000 active members and the 70,000 retired members of the West Virginia AFL-CIO, please accept our comments below related to the CRENEL draft report. The CRENEL report makes numerous sensible and logical recommendations that we agree with.

  7. West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment March 11, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor (513) 246-0539 william.taylor@emcbc.doe.gov West Valley, New York - The U.S. Department of Energy today released a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) Evaluation of a vitrification melter at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) for review and comment by the public,

  8. Technical Roadmaps for Public Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Technical Roadmaps for Public Comment Technical Roadmaps for Public Comment Two technical roadmaps for leading geothermal technology sectors are open for review by the geothermal community and posted below for your feedback. Exploration Technical Roadmap A Roadmap for Strategic Development of Geothermal Exploration Technologies Characterizing productive geothermal systems is challenging yet critical to identify and develop an estimated 30 gigawatts electric (GWe) of undiscovered hydrothermal

  9. Public Comment Opportunities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Comments on the Draft EIS and Presidential permit can be submitted verbally during public hearings or in writing to Dr. Julie A Smith at: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE...

  10. OSTIblog Recent comments

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    of Energy (DOE) for the scientific contributor and also for Petroleum Engineering

    Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:20:00 +0000 comment 1254 at http:www.osti.govhome Microscope repair...

  11. EA and SOWP Comments

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    EA and SOWP Comments This document covers Knight Piisold's technical comments to the Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site (EA) and the Shiprock Site Observational Work Plan (SOWP). The major areas of concern include the following: 1. The contaminant sources on site may not be properly defined. In particular, the disposal cell and the residual vadose zone soil contamination need to be redefined in the conceptual model and the transport

  12. B&W Request for extension of DOE CSC Rule Comment Period 02 24 2015 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy B&W Request for extension of DOE CSC Rule Comment Period 02 24 2015 B&W Request for extension of DOE CSC Rule Comment Period 02 24 2015 PDF icon B&W Request for extension of DOE CSC Rule Comment Period 02242015 More Documents & Publications Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - April 2012 CIGNL CSC NOPR Extension Request 2-23-15 Convention on Supplementary Compensation Rulemaking

  13. Microsoft Word - DOE Comments on IIP

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    David R. Moeller Senior Attorney 218-723-3963 dmoeller@allete.com October 30, 2013 Julie A. Smith Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Mail Code: OE-20 United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: Minnesota Power's Comments Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53,436 (August 29, 2013) Dear Ms. Smith and Mr.

  14. DOE Hydrogen Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Satyapal, S.

    2009-11-01

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18 -22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia.

  15. CEQ Extends Comment Period on Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews | Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews CEQ Extends Comment Period on Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews February 20, 2015 - 11:03am Addthis The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has extended by 30 days the

  16. QER- Comment of Diane Cray

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good afternoon, Would it be possible to get a list of presenters and their written comments on meeting agenda?

  17. QER- Comment of Xcel Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are the comments of Xcel Energy Services Inc. Please let me know if you have any questions.

  18. NFR TRIGA package design review report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clements, M.D.

    1994-08-26

    The purpose of this document is to compile, present and document the formal design review of the NRF TRIGA packaging. The contents of this document include: the briefing meeting presentations, package description, design calculations, package review drawings, meeting minutes, action item lists, review comment records, final resolutions, and released drawings. This design review required more than two meeting to resolve comments. Therefore, there are three meeting minutes and two action item lists.

  19. Dual axis radiographic hydrodynamic test facility. Final environmental impact statement, Volume 2: Public comments and responses

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-08-01

    On May 12, 1995, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued the draft Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility Environmental Impact Statement (DARHT EIS) for review by the State of New Mexico, Indian Tribes, local governments, other Federal agencies, and the general public. DOE invited comments on the accuracy and adequacy of the draft EIS and any other matters pertaining to their environmental reviews. The formal comment period ran for 45 days, to June 26, 1995, although DOE indicated that late comments would be considered to the extent possible. As part of the public comment process, DOE held two public hearings in Los Alamos and Santa Fe, New Mexico, on May 31 and June 1, 1995. In addition, DOE made the draft classified supplement to the DARHT EIS available for review by appropriately cleared individuals with a need to know the classified information. Reviewers of the classified material included the State of New Mexico, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Defense, and certain Indian Tribes. Volume 2 of the final DARHT EIS contains three chapters. Chapter 1 includes a collective summary of the comments received and DOE`s response. Chapter 2 contains the full text of the public comments on the draft DARHT EIS received by DOE. Chapter 3 contains DOE`s responses to the public comments and an indication as to how the comments were considered in the final EIS.

  20. WRAP 2A advanced conceptual design report comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lamberd, D.L.

    1994-10-04

    This report contains the compilation of the 393 comments that were submitted during the review of the Advanced Conceptual Design Report for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Module 2A. The report was prepared by Raytheon Engineers and Constructors, Inc. of Englewood, Colorado for the United States Department of Energy. The review was performed by a variety of organizations identified in the report. The comments were addressed first by the Westinghouse cognizant engineers and then by the Raytheon cognizant engineers, and incorporated into the final issue of the Advanced Conceptual Design Report.

  1. Full Reviews: Enhanced Geothermal Systems | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Project Presentation | Peer Reviewer Comments Concept Testing and Development at the Raft River Geothermal Field, Idaho Joseph Moore, University of Utah Project Presentation | Peer ...

  2. US DOE Quadrennial Energy Review Transmission, Storage, and Distributi...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Comments of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) for the US DOE Quadrennial Energy Review Transmission, Storage, and Distribution of Electricity Public Hearing Lewis & ...

  3. CenterPoint Comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    CenterPoint Comments CenterPoint Comments CenterPoint Comments on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges PDF icon CenterPoint Comments More Documents & Publications City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI:

  4. QER- Comment of Brian West

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Thanks for the invitation to the QER workshop. Here are a couple of comments that I was probably unable to fully articulate in the main session, although I did try to make some of these points in the breakout session: When considering alternatives and policy that drives alternative fuel use, it is important to learn from Policy successes and failures. Policy drivers put in place in Thailand, Brazil, and Sweden have been successful in transitions to greater alternative fuel use. US policy for Flex Fuel Vehicles has been largely unsuccessful at encouraging alternative fuel use. The fuel economy credit for the OEMs to build FFVs was generous but encouraged only modest production; nonetheless there are over 15M FFVs on the road. However, they use very little ethanol fuel due to cost ($/mile), range, etc. Natural Gas has a very real value proposition (lower $/gge) so fleet owners have good financial incentive to make the switch, even if investments are required. One participant commented that infrastructure costs are small compared to costs of imported oil. I agree with this statement. One presenter mentioned (a city?) with a law that requires infrastructure to support future EV charging be installed in any new parking garage. Great idea. (Better to have and not need than need and not have, especially when cost differential is small on the front end and very large on the back end). In the US we install about 20,000-40,000 new fuel dispensers per year (according to Gilbarco/Wayne). It would be a horrible missed opportunity to not put policy in place that encourages/requires E25 or E85-compatible dispensers. With a successful policy driver, in the next five years the nation could have over 100,000 ethanol-compatible dispensers in place, ready for a new High Octane Fuel (that could very likely contain more than 10 or 15% ethanol). Thanks Brian H. West Fuels, Engines, and Emissions Research Center Oak Ridge National Laboratory http://www.ornl.gov/ http://feerc.ornl.gov/ http://www.fueleconomy.gov/ From: Tillemann, Levi Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 3:52 PM To: West, Brian H. Subject: AMR/QER Technical Workshop Dear Brian: On behalf of the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) I want to thank you for your participation at the June 20th AMR/QER Alternative Transportation Refueling Infrastructure technical workshop. Your contribution in the breakout sessions and general discussion sessions provided valuable insight that will help inform EPSA during the QER process going forward. During the course of the workshop, detailed notes were taken. These have been anonymized and will be made publically available to you and the general public in the coming weeks. Once they are posted, we will provide you with a link for accessing them online. We encourage you to submit additional comments regarding infrastructure for transmission, storage or distribution of alternative transportation fuels to qercomments@hq.doe.gov. For more information about the QER's stakeholder meeting locations, areas of analysis and public comments you can visit the QER website at: http://energy.gov/epsa/initiatives/quadrennial-energy-review-qer. Please feel free to contact me or Sallie Gilbert (sallie.gilbert@hq.doe.gov) if you have additional questions. I will be leaving the DOE August 1, thereafter you may contact Renee Picket (adonica.pickett@hq.doe.gov) or Carla Frisch (carla.frisch@hq.doe.gov) with questions or comments. Thank you again for making the workshop a great success. I look forward to working together with all of you on these issues in the future. Best regards, Levi Tillemann, Ph.D. Special Advisor, EPSA US Department of Energy

  5. QER- Comment of American Natural Gas Association- FWD by John Richards

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    John - We thought the attached might be helpful in framing things. We will of course consider submitting formal comments following the event and review of the transcript but thought the attached information might be helpful in the interim.

  6. Consumer Electronics Association Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Consumer Electronics Association Comment Consumer Electronics Association Comment The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) is the preeminent trade association promoting growth in the $285 billion U.S. consumer electronics industry. PDF icon CEA comments re DOE Regulatory Burden RFI_7-17-15 More Documents & Publications Comments of consumer electronics association Re: NBP RFI: Data Access AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI

  7. QTR - unedited comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    - unedited comments QTR - unedited comments PDF icon Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information More Documents & Publications Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI QTR table of respondents

  8. QER- Comment of America's Natural Gas Alliance 1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good morning- Please find attached a transmittal letter from Marty Durbin as well as supplemental comments from America’s Natural Gas Alliance on the April 11, 2014 meeting of the Quadrennial Energy Review entitled ‘Enhancing Energy Infrastructure Resiliency and Addressing Vulnerabilities’. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. Thank you very much.

  9. QER- Comment of Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To whom it may concern: Please find attached comments from the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Association on the Quadrennial Energy Review public meeting held in Washington, DC on April 11. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me.

  10. QER- Comment of Metroplolitan Water District of Southern California

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you for the extensive outreach and opportunity to provide input into the Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). Metropolitan is pleased to provide the following comments on the QER and the water energy nexus: Please contact me if you have any questions. Warren

  11. Comments/Questions | Critical Materials Institute

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comments/Questions To offer comments on the CMI website or to ask questions, please contact us: CMIdirector@ameslab.gov 515-296-4500 or use this web form for comments. Thanks!

  12. Comments - Change package

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Card comments on the Change packages: 1)Overriding assumptions that the amount of work is finite - such as: - Finite # of dollars available - Finite # of highly trained contract workers - Finite amount of contaminated groundwater - Permits with finite terms -Secondary assumption that work can be characterized and prioritized - What appears to be infinite is the time available to mitigate the problem. No way to realistically estimate how long mitigation will take. The decision making process

  13. web_comments.xls

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Date Rec Type Recommendations/ Comments Name Organization 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Future reliability standards must strike a balance between detailed, rigid requirements, which provide little or no latitude for deviation, and standards, which are objective-based and allow for innovation and invention to achieve intended goals. Each standard should identify its importance on the BPS reliability in terms of the potential short-term (operating time horizon) vs. long-term (planning time

  14. Microsoft Word - CLWR scoping Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be...

  15. Comments of consumer electronics association | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    consumer electronics association Comments of consumer electronics association The Consumer Electronics Association ("CEA") respectfully submits these comments in response to the ...

  16. QER- Comment of Dakota Resource Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are comments from the Dakota Resource Council, a membership-based organization of North Dakotans. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Infrastructure Constraints.

  17. QER- Comment of John R. Schmidt

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    "Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on the Public Meeting "Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency," held April 11, 2014, Washington, DC". Why would this meeting not be conducted live onLine? or, at least, recorded for later access. Thank you, sincerely, john r schmidt, master (lover) of Science understanding GOD president, NCAD Corporation www.NCAD.net owner, schmidtPro www.schmidtPro.com dedicated River-straddler Erlanger, KY 41018 Cincinnati, OH 45202-0931 computer engineering Network Communications Geospatial Integrative Service Business engineering schmidtPro professional green improv improving earth and health for better world earth Model Do http://emoDo.net

  18. EEI DOE QER Comments and Resources

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Table o f C ontents 1. Comments o f t he E dison E lectric I nstitute o n t he D epartment o f E nergy Quadrennial Energy Review- Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerabilities --- Cyber, P hysical, C limate, I nterdependencies 2. Before And After The Storm: A Compilation Of Recent Studies, Programs, And Policies Related To Storm Hardening And Resiliency 3. SpareConnect Info Sheet 4. Raising Our Game --- Distributed E nergy Resources Present Opportunities-And Challenges-For The Electric Utility

  19. QER- Comment of Laurel Greenberg

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To the Energy Review Task Force, I am a resident of Boston and also have property in Cummington, Mass. I am commenting specifically on a proposed gas pipeline by Kinder Morgan through the state of Massachusetts, but also generically on energy policy in New England. I am against building another gas pipeline in Massachusetts. The environmental and ecological risk of running a high pressure gas pipeline through conservation land, pristine nature, important water reservoirs, and residents farms and properties is great, and not where we as stewards of the earth should be putting our efforts. We should heed the findings that climate change is upon us and to the recommendations that we must curtail global warming emissions (like methane) and promote and support renewable energy. We should pay attention to recent independent findings that hydraulic fracturing has serious environmental problems, contributes to global warming, is harming water supplies, causes earthquakes, and is not a safe, secure, renewable method of obtaining energy. In summary, as leaders in environmental policy, we in New England should not be encouraging the production of fracked gas by building a conduit for that gas through our states. Laurel Greenberg

  20. Heavy vehicle systems optimization merit review and peer evaluation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    None, None

    2009-01-18

    This report is a summary and analysis of comments from the Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, held April 18-20, 2006.

  1. CA IOUs Comment Letter

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this

  2. QER- Comment of Governors' Wind Energy Coalition

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the Governors' Wind Energy Coalition's comments on the QER. Thank you. Larry Pearce

  3. DOE - BCS TSD comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    - BCS TSD comments DOE - BCS TSD comments PowerPoint slides presenting AHAM and PTI comments on technical support document. PDF icon DOE - BCS TSD comments More Documents & Publications Ex Parte Meeting with DOE and Navigant Consulting on Battery Charger Energy Fact Sheet: Lithium-Ion Batteries for Stationary Energy Storage (October 2012) EV Everywhere Batteries Workshop - Beyond Lithium Ion Breakout Session Report

  4. Tribal Comments Database | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments Database Tribal Comments Database Summary of all comments from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtables held between March 16 and April 14, 2011. PDF icon TribalEnergyRoundtable_CommentsDatabase.pdf More Documents & Publications 1. INTRODUCTION Tribal Roundable Executive Summary Pala Roundtable Summary

  5. 2015 Annual Merit Review, Vehicle Technologies Office

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... The reviewer commented that gaining this knowledge supports the VTO programs and other ... This is not useful for informing tech development, as the results seem to be presented as ...

  6. Review. Ernie Perry, PhD

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Mid-America Freight Coalition comments for the Quadrennial Energy Review. Ernie Perry, PhD University of Wisconsin - Madison ebperry@wisc.edu August 8 2014 Chicago, Il. Thank you ...

  7. QER- Comment of Ecova

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, If you are developing a list serve for the Quadrennial Energy Review, please include me on it. Thanks!

  8. Energy Storage - Advanced Technology Development Merit Review |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Advanced Technology Development Merit Review Energy Storage - Advanced Technology Development Merit Review This document is a summary of the evaluation and comments provided by the review panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Technology Development (ATD) program annual review. The review was held at the Argonne National Laboratory on August 9-10, 2005. A panel of knowledgeable, independent reviewers assessed the accomplishments of the ATD program and

  9. Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    04 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review INTRODUCTION This Bulletin establishes that important scientific information shall be peer reviewed by qualified specialists before it is disseminated by the federal government. We published a proposed Bulletin on September 15, 2003. Based on public comments, we published a revised proposal for additional comment on April 28, 2004. We are now finalizing the April version, with minor revisions responsive to the

  10. Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    to October 31, 2013. Comments received are available below. PDF icon Comments from Lee Cunningham, sent September 23, 2013 PDF icon Comments from Patrick Ledger of Arizona's...

  11. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Dr. Contreras ...

  12. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from Marshall Hughes Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Marshall Hughes Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Marshall ...

  13. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. Comment from Lewis Cain 6-8-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

  14. EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Comment Period EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period Klondike IIIBiglow Canyon Wind Integration Project This notice extends the close of comment for scoping from the...

  15. .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Comments from...

  16. Reply Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Verizon and Verizon Wireless More Documents & Publications Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc....

  17. Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx PDF icon Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx More Documents & Publications...

  18. West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation June 29, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Bryan Bower 716-942-4368 Bill Taylor bill.taylor@srs.gov 803-952-8564 West Valley, NY - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today released to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the public and the states of Nevada and Texas, and the Seneca Nation of Indians for review and comment, a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the

  19. QER - Comment of GridWise Alliance 3 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    3 QER - Comment of GridWise Alliance 3 From: Wayland, Karen Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 8:50 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Fw: GridWise Alliance's Comments on the First Phase of the Quadrennial Energy Review Attached Attachment: GWA_QER Comments_August_2014_Final.pdf From: ladeene@freimuthgroup.com [mailto:ladeene@freimuthgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 07:52 PM To: Secretary Moniz; John Holdren; Daniel_G._Utech@who.eop.gov <Daniel_G._Utech@who.eop.gov>; Kenderdine, Melanie Cc:

  20. Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This manual establishes polices and procedures for carrying out the EPA's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment. 

  1. Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment (EPA, 1984)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This manual establishes policies and procedures for carrying out the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment.

  2. Microsoft Word - CLWR scoping Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be received on or before November 14, 2011. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be faxed to: Mr. Curtis Chambellan Mr. Curtis Chambellan CLWR SEIS Document Manager (505) 845-5872 U.S. DOE/NNSA Box 5400 or sent by electronic mail to: Albuquerque, NM 87185-5400

  3. From: Jane Wilsdorf To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comment

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Jane Wilsdorf To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comment Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 9:37:00 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  4. Submit a Public Comment on The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) External Merit

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Review Meeting Summary | Department of Energy Submit a Public Comment on The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) External Merit Review Meeting Summary Submit a Public Comment on The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) External Merit Review Meeting Summary March 5, 2014 - 9:01am Addthis The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) Initiative within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is a multi-year DOE research initiative targeting significant reductions in the

  5. Temporal Representation in Semantic Graphs

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levandoski, J J; Abdulla, G M

    2007-08-07

    A wide range of knowledge discovery and analysis applications, ranging from business to biological, make use of semantic graphs when modeling relationships and concepts. Most of the semantic graphs used in these applications are assumed to be static pieces of information, meaning temporal evolution of concepts and relationships are not taken into account. Guided by the need for more advanced semantic graph queries involving temporal concepts, this paper surveys the existing work involving temporal representations in semantic graphs.

  6. QER- Comment of Emily Crowell

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    One of the Senator’s constituents dropped off comments that she wanted to pass along to your office re: the QER public meeting. For your records her contact information is below:

  7. Comment and Response Management System

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    1998-06-09

    CRMS is a Web-based client/server application that helps manage, track, and report on institutional responses to public comments on published documents such as environmental impact statements.

  8. Scoping Comment Summary 092412.docx

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Scoping Comment Summary for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, and Tennessee Valley Authority Since announcement of the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SPD Supplemental EIS), DOE has provided three opportunities for the public to provide scoping comments (2007 [72 FR 14543]; 2010 [75 FR 41850]; and 2012 [77 FR 1920]). The public scoping

  9. Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Peer Review | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Peer Review Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Peer Review This report is a summary and analysis of comments from the Review Panel at the FY 2006 DOE Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, held April 18-20, 2006. PDF icon Merit Review and Peer Evaluation More Documents & Publications Advanced Combustion Engine R&D and Fuels Technology Merit Review 2013 Annual Merit Review Results Report 2013 Annual Merit Review Results

  10. Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). | Department of Energy Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). I have reviewed the Request For Information

  11. QER- Comment of Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To: Members of the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Secretariat and Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Staff, U.S. Department of Energy Enclosed please find comments submitted on behalf of Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. for the record of the QER’s August 21, 2014 Infrastructure Siting and Permitting Meeting in Cheyenne, WY. Feel free to contact me if you need anything further regarding this communication.

  12. Microsoft Word - AppendixH_CommentResponse.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NFSS Vicinity Property Report October 2010 Doc. No. S06246 Page H-1 Responsiveness Summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties, New York: Review of Radiological Conditions at Six Vicinity Properties and Two Drainage Ditches on April 23, 2010, for public comment. Report availability was announced through a message to stakeholders sent on behalf of DOE by USACE. The announcement provided a

  13. Temporal Scattering And Response

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    1992-12-15

    TSAR2.3 (Temporal Scattering and Response) is a finite-difference time-domain electromagnetics code suite. TSAR2.3 is a software package for simulating the interactions of electromagnetic waves with linear materials through the use of the finite-difference time-domain method. The code suite contains grid generation, grid verification, input-file creation and post-processing utilities. The physics package, written in Fortran 77, can be pre-processed to run on many different architectures including Cray, Vax and many Unix workstations. Tools are provided tomore » easily port the code to new computers. The physics package is an efficient, flexible electromagnetic simulator. A body under study can be represented as a three-dimensional grid of materials with arbitrary linear properties. This grid can be simulated in a number of ways including incident plane waves, dipoles, and arbitrary incident fields. The grid can be terminated with numerous boundary conditions including free-space radiation, electric conductor, or magnetic conductor. Projection to the far-field in both the time and frequency domains is possible. This distribution includes make files for installing and maintaining the entire code suite.« less

  14. Biomass Program Review | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Biomass Program Review Biomass Program Review This document summarizes the comments provided by our panels of expert reviewers at the Office of the Biomass Program Biennial Program Peer Review, held November 14-16, 2005 in Arlington, VA. The work evaluated in this document supports Department of Energy Biomass Program and the results of the review are major inputs used by the Program in making programmatic and funding decisions for the future. The recommendations of the panels have been taken

  15. Summary of comments received from workshops on radiological criteria for decommissioning

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Caplin, J.; Page, G.; Smith, D.; Wiblin, C.

    1994-01-01

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is conducting an enhanced participatory rulemaking to establish radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning of NRC-licensed facilities. Open public meetings were held during 1993 in Chicago, IL, San Francisco, CA, Boston, MA, Dallas, TX, Philadelphia, PA, Atlanta, GA, and Washington, DC. Interested parties were invited to provide input on the rulemaking issues before the NRC staff develops a draft proposed rule. This report summarizes 3,635 comments categorized from transcripts of the seven workshops and 1,677 comments from 100 NRC docketed letters from individuals and organizations. No analysis or response to the comments is included. The comments reflect a broad spectrum of viewpoints on the issues related to radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning. The NRC also held public meetings on the scope of the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) during July 1993. The GEIS meetings were held in Washington, DC., San Francisco, CA, Oklahoma City, OK, and Cleveland, OH. Related comments from these meetings were reviewed and comments which differed substantially from those from the workshops are also summarized in the body of the report. A summary of the comments from the GEIS scoping meetings is included as an Appendix.

  16. Microsoft Word - CLWR Draft SEIS Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Curtis Chambellan tritium.readiness.seis@doeal.gov CLWR SEIS Document Manager U.S. DOENNSA...

  17. Comments/Questions? | The Ames Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comments/Questions? Name (optional): Email Address (optional): Comment/Question: * CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Submit

  18. Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Dockets Open for Public Comment A list of current dockets open for public comment can be found on at this web page here. FILINGS: Filings may be submitted using one of the ...

  19. FINAL REPORT-COMMISSION TO REVIEW THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATIONAL ENERGY

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    LABORATORIES | Department of Energy FINAL REPORT-COMMISSION TO REVIEW THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATIONAL ENERGY LABORATORIES FINAL REPORT-COMMISSION TO REVIEW THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATIONAL ENERGY LABORATORIES The Commission convened its final meeting in a public teleconference on October 23, 2015. At this meeting, the Commission outlined comments received on its final report during the written public comment period, heard additional comments from the public, and voted unanimously to

  20. Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment These comments are submitted by Goodman Global, Inc. ("Goodman") in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) appearing in the Federal Register on July 3, 2014. PDF icon 07-18-2014 Goodman Comments on Regulatory Burden RFI.PDF More Documents & Publications 2014-06-25 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnace Fans; Final Rule ISSUANCE 2015-08-21:

  1. Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments Comments to DOE on Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Regulations for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment EO 13563 Preliminary Plan PDF icon Microsoft Word - Lochinvar Comments -EO 13563 Preliminary Plan.docx More Documents & Publications Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulatory Burden RFI AHRI Preliminary Plan for Retrospective

  2. QER- Comment of Geotherman Energy Association (GEA)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hi the Geothermal Energy Association would like to submit the attached comments for the 2014 QER process. Thanks,

  3. National Electrical Manufacturers Association Comment | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Comment National Electrical Manufacturers Association Comment The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached comments on the Request for Information to Reduce Regulatory Burden as announced in the U.S. Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 127, beginning on page 38019. PDF icon Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments regarding small motor regulations 17July2015 v5_1 More Documents & Publications National Electrical Manufacturers

  4. QER- Comment of National Resource Defense Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please accept this paper as a comment into the QER record on siting energy and transmission resources.

  5. Comments on backreaction and cosmic acceleration

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kolb, Edward W.; Matarrese, Sabinio; Riotto, Antonion; /CERN

    2005-11-01

    In this brief WEB note we comment on recent papers related to our paper ''On Acceleration Without Dark Energy''.

  6. Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment These comments are submitted by Goodman Global, Inc. ("Goodman") in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) appearing in the Federal Register on July 3, 2014. PDF icon 07-18-2014 Goodman Comments on Regulatory Burden RFI.PDF More Documents & Publications 2014-06-25 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnace Fans; Final Rule 2014-08-28 Issuance:

  7. Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Below are links to DOE NEPA projects with open comment periods, including comment periods on the proposed scope of planned NEPA documents and on draft NEPA documents (e.g., draft environmental assessments and draft environmental impacts statements). EIS-0514: Colusa-Sutter 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project; Colusa and Sutter Counties, California Western Area Power Administration (Western) and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District

  8. Biomass Program 2007 Program Peer Review - Program Summary Section

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2009-10-27

    This document summarizes the comments provided by the peer reviewers at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Biomass Programs Peer Review meeting, held on November 14-15, 2007 in Baltimore, MD and Platform Reviews conducted over the summer of 2007. The Platform Reviews provide evaluations of the Programs projects in applied research, development, and demonstration.

  9. Biomass Program 2007 Program Peer Review - Full Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2009-10-27

    This document summarizes the comments provided by the peer reviewers at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Biomass Programs Peer Review meeting, held on November 14-15, 2007 in Baltimore, MD and Platform Reviews conducted over the summer of 2007. The Platform Reviews provide evaluations of the Programs projects in applied research, development, and demonstration.

  10. Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects | Department of Energy on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published a Request for Information seeking information on a draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for

  11. QER- Comment of Don Ogden

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force and Energy Policy Systems Analysis Staff: We are unable to attend today's public meeting in Hartford, CT. With only four working days advanced notice of this event we find it difficult to believe that any real effort has been made on your part to reach out to the public for their input. Be that as it may, we want to take this opportunity to comment on the very subject of this meeting. The only true energy related "Infrastructure constraints" we are aware of here in New England are those experienced by corporate entities who seek to export our precious resources to other nations for profit. This, of course, is not at all in the public's interest. Certainly you recall all the efforts our goverment put into establishing "Energy Independence"? That phrase has, and continues to be the watchword heard throughout our nation. Why now, when so-called "Energy Independence" has yet to be established, would we choose to enable private corporations to export gas and oil to other countries at our expense? Further, why is it that corporations and their supporters in government are not actively seeking to repair the massive and dangerous leaks in our existing pipelines? How can corporations and government agencies who reportedly oversee energy corporations even consider building new pipelines when the existing ones are in so need of repair? With this in mind, the only "constraints" we are aware of are the lack of constraints on energy corporations run amok, forever seeking more profits at the expense of the public good. Please recall your mission: "The mission of the Energy Department is to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions." Such security is only possible if we plan ahead for future generations in the midst of the Climate Crisis. Selling off our energy resources to other nations until they are depleted is not in keeping with that mission. Allowing existing energy infrastructure to leak methane and other elements into our compromised atmosphere is not in keeping with that mission. Let's have some of those "transformative solutions", let's put every effort into limiting gas & oil leaks and keeping our energy resources here at home. Don Ogden, producer/co-host The Enviro Show WXOJ-LP & WMCB

  12. QER- Comment of American Water

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear QER Team; Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments to the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force to discuss the water and energy nexus, advances in water innovative technologies, and the impact of climate change on water issues. On behalf of American Water, I wish to submit the following White Papers which we have prepared on these critical issues: Innovations in Energy Use Sustainability and Resiliency Planning for Water Utilities One Water Water/Energy Correlation The Value of Water Challenges in the Water Industry: Climate Change Challenges in the Water Industry: Meeting Demand in the West Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Desalination Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Going Green Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Water Reuse Bridging the Water Innovation Gap. Founded in 1886, American Water is the largest publicly traded U.S. water and wastewater utility company. With headquarters in Voorhees, NJ, the company employs approximately 6,600 dedicated professionals who provide drinking water, wastewater and other related services to an estimated 14 million people in more than 40 states. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if there is any way American Water can be helpful to your mission. Respectfully Yours, Martin (See attached file: White Papers.pdf) Martin D. Kerckhoff Vice President and Divisional General Counsel Central Division American Water CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION This email and any attachments hereto constitute a legally confidential communication from the Legal Department of American Water. The information contained herein is subject to attorney-client privilege and is for the sole use of the intended original addressee. If you are not the intended original addressee, you are hereby notified that any reading, disclosure, copying, distribution, use, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us at 314.966.2241 and delete this message from your system. WARNING: Although American Water has taken reasonable precautions to ensure that no viruses are present in this email, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free. No responsibility is accepted by American Water for any loss or damage arising in any way from the receipt and/or use of this email.

  13. From: Mills, Pamela To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Strack, Jan

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Mills, Pamela To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Strack, Jan Subject: National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment Date: Friday, October 17, 2014 6:18:37 PM Attachments: SDGE Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment.docx Please find attached SDG&E's comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment. Any questions or comments regarding the attached document should be

  14. 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on June 16-20, 2014, in Washington, DC. It covers the program areas

  15. 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 13-17, 2013, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program a

  16. 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 9-13, 2011, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program ar

  17. 2015 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2015 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on June 8-12, 2015, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program a

  18. 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18-22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program areas of hydroge

  19. 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on June 7-11, 2010, in Washington, DC. It covers the program areas of hydrogen pro

  20. 2008 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2008 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on June 9-13, 2008, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program areas of hydroge

  1. 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2012, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program a

  2. 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The report summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, which was held May 1317, 2013, in Arlington, Virginia.

  3. QER- Comment of Silvia Wessel

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    One additional comment I have: In order to ensure success of the H2 infrastructure the fueling stations need to meet the expectations of the customer and more specifically the H2 quality specifications necessary to protect the fuel cell vehicles.

  4. QER- Comment of IEEE

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Bill: The IEEE Joint Task Force on Quadrennial Energy Review (QER) is pleased to submit our draft report on the priority topics as requested in your April 29 letter. We have recruited leaders from our membership to develop responses based on work by IEEE members and other industry publications. The leaders have engaged a large IEEE volunteer community to support this initiative.

  5. Interested Parties - WAPA Public Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    WAPA Public Comment Interested Parties - WAPA Public Comment Comments Received in Response to Western Area Power Administration's Federal Register Notice Titled 'Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments.' PDF icon Microsoft Word - AAAA1.doc More Documents & Publications Mid-West Electric Consumers Association Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx

  6. Power Electronics and Electric Machines Merit Review, May 2005 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Electric Machines Merit Review, May 2005 Power Electronics and Electric Machines Merit Review, May 2005 A report that lists Attendees, Webcast Attendance Report, Summary of Reviewer's Ratings Grouped by Research Areas and Reviewer Comments. PDF icon Annual Review Report More Documents & Publications Power Electronics and Electrical Machines Review, August 2006 Advanced Soft Switching Inverter for Reducing Switching and Power Losses Eliminating High Risk Work at Hanford

  7. QER- Comment of MISO

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), respectfully submits two studies to the Department of Energy (DOE) for consideration in preparing its Quadrennial Energy Review (QER) on transmission, storage and distribution infrastructure. MISO also presented to DOE on the QER at the Newark, NJ public session held on September 8, 2014. MISO appreciates that opportunity. In addition to the material presented in Newark, MISO recently completed two studies on transmission and energy storage in the MISO footprint, which covers all or parts of 15 states in the middle of the Unites States.

  8. Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Public Comment...

  9. Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges DC...

  10. Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Ingersoll Rand Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges PDF...

  11. PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PDF icon PIA - DOE OCIO, Open...

  12. Modifications for Public Comment - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Modifications for Public Comment Tri-Party Agreement The Agreement Announcements List of Approved Changes TPA Project Manager's Lists Modifications for Public Comment Data Management MP-14 WIDS Information Hanford Site Waste Management Units Report Hanford Public Involvement Plan Administrative Record (AR) Related Links Modifications for Public Comment Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size NOTE: Some documents are in the Adobe Acrobat Portable Document

  13. Recommendation 192: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy 2: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report Recommendation 192: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report The ORSSAB presented to DOE Recommendations and Comments on the Draft 2010 Remediation Effectiveness Report for the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation. PDF icon Recommendation 192 PDF icon DOE response to recommendation 192 More Documents & Publications ORSSAB Meeting - May 2013 ORSSAB Meeting - June 2013 ORSSAB Meeting - April 2014

  14. QER - Comment of Entergy | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Entergy QER - Comment of Entergy From: Turton, Daniel [dturton@entergy.com] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 5:12 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Subject: Comments on Enhancing Energy Infrastructure Resiliency and Addressing Vulnerabilities Attachment: Entergy Responses to Key Questions Regarding Energy System Vulnerabiliti....pdf Please find our comments for submission attached. My contact information is below if needed. Dan Turton Vice President, Federal Government Affairs Entergy

  15. LTS Plan Workshop Questions and Comments

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    LTS Plan Workshop Questions and Comments August 28, 2002 Monitoring and Maintenance 1. Is there a possibility of spontaneous combustion in the disposal cell? Response J-1: The concerns raised by the comments are valid for certain well-defined scenarios, most of which involve either composting protocols or disposal of organic mass in demolition or municipal landfills. The commentator references the quantity of more than 10,000 cubic yards of wood or other similar materials incorporated into the

  16. Biomass Program 2007 Peer Review - Integrated Biorefinery Platform Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2009-10-27

    This document discloses the comments provided by a review panel at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program Peer Review held on November 15-16, 2007 in Baltimore, MD and the Integrated Biorefinery Platform Review held on August 13-15, 2007 in Golden, Colorado.

  17. Biomass Program 2007 Program Peer Review - Thermochemical Conversion Platform Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2009-10-27

    This document discloses the comments provided by a review panel at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program Peer Review held on November 15-16, 2007 in Baltimore, MD and the Biomass Program Peer Review for the Thermochemical Platform, held on July 9th and 10th in Golden, Colorado.

  18. Biomass Program 2007 Program Peer Review - Feedstock Platform Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2009-10-27

    This document discloses the comments provided by a review panel at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program Peer Review held on November 15-16, 2007 in Baltimore, MD and the Feedstock Platform Portfolio Peer Review held on August 21st through 23rd in Washington D.C.

  19. Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI regarding the communication needs of utilities which are incorporated by reference as part of the comments in this proceeding. PDF icon Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities

  20. Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access Consumers Union, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen submit the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy (-DOE or -Department) in the above-referenced matter. PDF icon Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access More Documents & Publications Comments on Smart Grid data access AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing

  1. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Chantel |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy from Chantel Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Chantel Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Chantel 06-09-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Mr. Garrett Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Rutherford Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Campbell

  2. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Marshall

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Hughes | Department of Energy from Marshall Hughes Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Marshall Hughes Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Marshall Hughes 07-10-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Mr. Dyer Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Sheila Beck Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Patti McCutchen

  3. Comments of Crow Wing Power | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Crow Wing Power Comments of Crow Wing Power Comments of Crow Wing Power on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Crow Wing Power More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of East Central Energy- Minnesota

  4. EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses On July 2, 2014 in the Federal Register, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published and requested comment on draft guidance for implementing Section 242 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005). See 79 FR 37733 (July 2, 2014). In many instances, there were common themes among the commenters. This document consolidates and summarizes the comments and responds to the comments. PDF icon EPAct Section

  5. QER- Comment of Berkshire Hathaway Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached for filing is a brief comment from Berkshire Hathaway Energy along with a supporting attachment for DOE’s consideration. Regards, Jay

  6. Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    and Saguaro, Arizona substations. EIS-0463: Northern Pass Transmission Line Project, New Hampshire Draft EIS and Supplement to the Draft EIS: Public Comment Periods End 1416...

  7. SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Transmission Project Comments Provided to the US Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Request for Information Relating to the Permitting...

  8. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 4

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    From: Peterson, Christopher (EIA)Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:11 PMTo: Pierpoint, LaraSubject: FW: AGA comments to QER: Natural Gas Emissions Section

  9. BPA Response to Customer Comments-EBBA

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Integration Team Responses to Customer Comments Received on BPA's Proposed Enhanced BPA Balancing Authority (EBBA) - 61212 Table of Contents 1. Market-based Mechanisms...

  10. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 5

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on finance and market incentives. Thank you, Hallie

  11. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the August 8th public meeting on infrastructure constraints. Thank you, Hallie

  12. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 4

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept this paper as comment into the QER record for the August 21st public meeting on infrastructure siting. Thank you, Hallie

  13. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 3

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept this paper as comment into the QER record for the August 11th public meeting on state, local and tribal issues. Thank you, Hallie

  14. QER- Comment of Airlines for America

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Attached please find the comments of Airlines for America concerning the October 6 meeting, energy infrastructure. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions.

  15. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 8

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on rural electrification, biomass processing and transportation. Thank you, Hallie

  16. Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation ...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability...

  17. HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio ...

  18. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the...

  19. National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014 National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No....

  20. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby...

  1. EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension for Time for Comments EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology In response to a public request, the...

  2. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light...

  3. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Block Plains and Eastern Clean Line: Arkansas and Oklahoma Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon ...

  4. Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring Federal Authorizations Extension of Comment...

  5. Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by the...

  6. NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013 ...

  7. Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request forInformation...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of ... Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of ...

  8. City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 The City of Fort...

  9. Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Florida Power and Light Comments on...

  10. NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013...

  11. City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:...

  12. PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia PEPCO Comments ... Order No. 202-05-3 of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Comments on ...

  13. Comments of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Cisco Systems provides comments in response to the RFI issued by DOE on addressing policy andlogistical challenges to smart grid implementation. PDF icon Comments of Cisco Systems ...

  14. Comments of Current Group, LLC | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments of Current Group, LLC regarding the request for information: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation PDF icon Comments of Current Group, ...

  15. Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: ...

  16. Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments ...

  17. Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Verizon and Verizon Wireless comments to DOE on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing policy and logistical challenges to smart grid implementation PDF icon Comments of Verizon and ...

  18. CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments | National Nuclear...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Office of General Counsel National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) NEPA Reading Room CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments...

  19. QER - Comment of America's Natural Gas Alliance 2 | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Monday, August 18, 2014 2:52 PM To: QERcomments CC: Richards, John Subject: ANGA Submission on New England QER Meetings Attachment: ANGA Comments re- New England QER Meeting .pdf; Bentek_Analysis_NE_Market_Opportunities_12_17_2013_Final.pdf Good morning - Please find attached ANGA's comments on the New England public meeting during the Quadrennial Energy Review earlier this year. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have any questions. Thank you Sarah Sarah Venuto Director, Federal Affairs

  20. Appendix N of EERE Peer Review Guide | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    N of EERE Peer Review Guide Appendix N of EERE Peer Review Guide A sample peer review tracking document, identifying action items, relevant reviewer comments, action owners, and progress to date. PDF icon Appendix N. Peer Review Response Tracking More Documents & Publications Bioenergy Technologies Office Multi-Year Program Plan: November 2014 Update -- Sections Bioenergy Technologies Office Multi-Year Program Plan: July 2014 Update Bioenergy Technologies Office Multi-Year Program Plan: July

  1. Full Reviews: High-temperature Tools and Drilling | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    High-temperature Tools and Drilling Full Reviews: High-temperature Tools and Drilling Below are the project presentations and respective peer reviewer comments for High-temperature Tools and Drilling. GUFI: Geothermal Ultrasonic Fracture Imager Doug Patterson and Baker Hughes, Oilfield Operations Incorporated Project Presentation | Peer Reviewer Comments High-Temperature Motor Windings for Downhole Pumps Used in Geothermal Energy Production Matthew Hooker, Composite Technology Development, Inc.

  2. QER- Comment of Wyoming Infrastructure Authority

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis: Please accept the attached letter of comments pursuant to the above referenced meeting. I have also mailed the letter. We appreciate the scheduling of the meeting in Cheyenne and the opportunity to provide comments on permitting and siting of infrastructure on public lands. Regards,

  3. QER- Comment of Electric Drive Transportation Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached the comments of the Electric Drive Transportation Association regarding the first volume of the Department of Energy’s QER. If you have questions about our submittal or require further information, please contact me using the information provided below. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Genevieve Cullen

  4. Commercial Lighting Solutions, Webtool Peer Review Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jones, Carol C.; Meyer, Tracy A.

    2009-06-17

    The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the beta version of the CLS webtool, which contains retail box lighting solutions. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed about which feedback should be addressed for the release of version 1.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in New York City in May 2009. Due to the volume of data (~500 comments) the methodology for addressing the peer review comments was central to the success of the ultimate goal of improving the tool. The comments were first imported into a master spreadsheet, and then grouped and organized in several layers. Solutions to each comment were then rated by importance and feasibility to determine the practicality of resolving the concerns of the commenter in the short-term or long-term. The rating system was used as an analytical tool, but the results were viewed thoughtfully to ensure that they were not the sole the factor in determining which comments were recommended for near-term resolution. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 1.0 as well as appendices containing the short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 1.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

  5. QER- Comment of Tate Sullivan

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you. From: QERcomments [mailto:QERcomments@Hq.Doe.Gov] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 4:14 PM To: Tate Sullivan, CLSA Subject: RE: QER Public Meeting: Petroleum Product Transmission & Distribution Tate, You can find the panelists' statements and other information, including a link to a video of meetings when available, at www.energy.gov/qer. We will post transcripts for all meetings, which will include the facilitated discussion and any public comments given during the open mic, on the same website in the weeks following each meeting. All comments we receive through this email will eventually become public, but not until later this fall. Regards, Karen Karen G. Wayland, Ph.D. Deputy Director for State, Local and Tribal Cooperation Energy Policy and Systems Analysis U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20585 From: Tate Sullivan, CLSA Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:47 AM To: QERcomments Subject: QER Public Meeting: Petroleum Product Transmission & Distribution Are any of the presentations or comments during this public meeting going to be released in electronic form? Have they been released? Is there a replay available of the event? Thank you. Tate Sullivan, CFA CLSA Americas, LLC Vice President CLSA is committed to reducing consumption for a better environment and is ISO14001 certified. The content of this communication is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is committed to reducing consumption for a better environment and is ISO14001 certified. The content of this communication is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.

  6. 150122 Traxys DOE RFI Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    TRAXYS RESPONSES to DOE'S RFI ON EXCESS URANIUM MANAGEMENT Summary Statements based on Traxys' contracts and EIA Form 858 Filings: 1. Traxys is a primary, direct participant in the sale and introduction to market of the majority of DOE's excess uranium sales via a contractual relationship with Fluor B&W Portsmouth (FBP) to purchase and monetize all the UF6 it receives from DOE for services. Based on this unique position, Traxys is the only company that can factually comment and have actual

  7. Toshiba RFI Comments.xlsx

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Definition and Scope Answer/Comment 1 What significant policy challenges are likely to remain unaddressed if we employ Title XIII's definition? The following points are not referencedd in EISA 1301. ・Power provider should also control the output fluctuation of renewable resources. ・The end user should have the choice of which form of power storage to be used. Certain types of energy conservation and storage could work better in different applications (e.g. not only electricity power but also

  8. QER- Comment of Tate Sullivan

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Are any of the presentations or comments during this public meeting going to be released in electronic form? Have they been released? Is there a replay available of the event? Thank you. Tate Sullivan, CFA CLSA Americas, LLC Vice President CLSA is committed to reducing consumption for a better environment and is ISO14001 certified. The content of this communication is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.

  9. Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL PDF icon Comment ListingResponse_REEE Solicitation_final.pdf More Documents & Publications Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments Draft Advanced Nuclear Energy Solicitation Public Meeting Presentation DOE-LPO_Email-Update_001_Through_11

  10. Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    the Bonneville Power Administration Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration BPA appreciates the opportunity to provide comments and information and submits the following comments in response to the DOE RFI. PDF icon Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration More Documents & Publications RE: NBP RFI: Communication Requirements CX-001184: Categorical Exclusion Determination Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies

  11. Comments to Section 934 Rulemaking | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    to Section 934 Rulemaking Comments to Section 934 Rulemaking ConverDyn's comments on section 934 rulemaking PDF icon Comments to Section 934 Rulemaking More Documents & Publications NOPR ConverDyn Memo to DOE re conference call minutes Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation

  12. Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments PDF icon Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments More Documents & Publications Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL Draft Advanced Nuclear Energy Solicitation Public Meeting Presentation

  13. QER- Comment of Sander Resources

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good morning. I wanted to follow up on our discussion regarding Section 4.4 of the briefing document used for the QER event on Energy Infrastructure Financing. Per my earlier comments, information in that section does not accurately reflect the business model of pipelines, and particularly for the "midstream" sector, or those gathering and processing activities and intrastate pipelines. Further, it does not accurately describe the "utility" designation of these lines or how or why these designations are used. It is also important to note that the reference to "take-or-pay" contracts is particularly concerning as those types of contracts are prohibited in many states as I understand it. I have attached an updated redline version of that section that addresses the issues. I would be more than happy to work with someone to correct the language if the suggested language does not work for any reason. Thank you for your consideration of the comments and proposed changes. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance.

  14. EIS-0236-S4: Extension of Comment Period | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension of Comment Period EIS-0236-S4: Extension of Comment Period Complex Transformation Extension of Comment Period for the Draft Complex Transformation Supplemental...

  15. EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Section 1817 Public Comments EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments Following are all comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy on the February 2007 draft of the Study, "The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issued That May Impede Their Expansion." All comments are provided in their original, unedited format. PDF icon EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments More Documents & Publications The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and the

  16. Comments of ATT&T Inc | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ATT&T Inc Comments of ATT&T Inc AT&T Inc comments on the Department of Energy's third Request for Information (RFI) on Smart Grid issues. PDF icon Comments of ATT&T Inc More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc. Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc.

  17. Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company BGE comments to DOE addressing policy and logistical challenges PDF icon Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company The Need for Essential Consumer Protections: Smart Metering Proposals

  18. DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 Comments of the office of peoples counsel, washington DC in response to the department of energy's request for information concerning smart grid issues. PDF icon DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 More Documents & Publications Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to smart grid Implementation: eMeter Response to Department of Energy RFI Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical

  19. NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Reducing Regulatory Burden NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Department of Energy's efforts to make its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. PDF icon NEMA_Comments_on_Reducing_Reg_Burden.pdf More Documents & Publications NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory

  20. Chapter 2 - Comment Documents Final Y-12 SWEIS

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    - Comment Documents Final Y-12 SWEIS February 2011 2-1 COMMENT RESPONSE DOCUMENT, CHAPTER 2: COMMENT DOCUMENTS This chapter is a compilation of all the documents that the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) received on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex during the public comment period. The documents are presented alphabetically by commentor's last name. On each document the first number represents the comment number within that

  1. RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and American Public Power Association file these brief reply comments in support of the comments and reply comments filed by the Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC"). Both organizations strongly believe that the Administration should ensure that adequate spectrum is available for internal, utility networks.

  2. Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative More Documents & Publications Comments of Utilities Telecom Council Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of

  3. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Avista Corporation NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation Comments of Avista Corporation on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation More Documents & Publications AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments Comments of Utilities Telecom Council RE: NBP RFI: Com

  4. .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RFI | Department of Energy .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Comments from Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI PDF icon .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment

  5. Dockets Open for Public Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Dockets Open for Public Comment Dockets Open for Public Comment Below is a list of the dockets that are currently open for public comment. The PDF files below contain more information on how to submit your comments. No Dockets Opened for Public Comment: More Documents & Publications Federal Register Notice for Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Perspective on Exporting Liquefied Natural Gas from the United States EIS-0520: Notice of Intent EIS-0519: Notice of Intent

  6. Microsoft Word - NGP EIS scoping Comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environ me ntal Imp act Statemen t for the Acquisition of a Natural Gas Pipeline and Natural Gas Utility Service at the Hanford Site U.S. Department of Energy Written Comment Form Must be received on or before February 22, 2012. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Douglas Chapin naturalgaseis@rl.gov NEPA Document Manager U.S. DOE/Richland Operations Office Box 550, MSIN A5-11 Richland, WA 99352

  7. Microsoft Word - CLWR Draft SEIS Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Draft Suppl emen tal Envi ron mental I mpa ct Statemen t for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be received on or before September 22, 2014. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Curtis Chambellan tritium.readiness.seis@doeal.gov CLWR SEIS Document Manager U.S. DOE/NNSA Box 5400

  8. Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments from the

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages | Department of Energy from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Docket No.

  9. DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued the Draft SEIS for public review and comment by mailings to stakeholders and by announcements in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 1999, (64 FR 60430) (Attachment 4 of Volume I)...

  10. From: Diana Rivera To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comments of Clean Line Energy on Draft Congestion Study

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Diana Rivera To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comments of Clean Line Energy on Draft Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:54:46 PM Attachments: image002.png Clean Line Comments to DOE 2014 Draft Congestion Study.pdf Hello, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft congestion study. Please see the attached comments from Clean Line Energy Partners. We would be happy to answer any questions or provide additional information. Best regards, Diana Diana Rivera CLEAN LINE

  11. Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    of the comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's intention to commence planned transmission outages of the 230kV transmission lines that serve...

  12. RegReview_ReplyComments_HeartandHome.pdf

    Energy Savers [EERE]

  13. RFIRegReviewComments_EdisonElectricInstitute_03212011.pdf

    Energy Savers [EERE]

  14. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... system to maintain the physical assets in a condition suitable for their intended use, * The preventive, predictive, and corrective maintenance to ensure physical asset ...

  15. COMMENTS

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and

  16. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    B-1 APPENDIX B RELATED INTERNET WEB SITES WHERE CAN I ACCESS ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REFERENCES LISTED IN THIS REFERENCE BOOK? http://www.cfo.doe.gov/policy/actindex/index.html-ssi DOE Accounting Handbook http://www.pr.doe.gov/acqguide.html DOE Acquisition Guide http://www.pr.doe.gov//acqltr.html DOE Acquisition Letters http://www.pr.doe.gov/dear.html DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) http://www.cfo.doe.gov/progliaison/bmop/index.htm DOE Business Management Oversight Process Web Page

  17. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and

  18. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 SECURITY (RESERVED)

  19. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... agency ethics official for ethics advise on specific conduct ... * Delays in the contract work are minimized; and * ... of members of the contract administration team. ...

  20. Federal Register Notice for Draft Addendum to Environmental Review

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States | Department of Energy Draft Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States Federal Register Notice for Draft Addendum to Environmental Review Documents Concerning Exports of Natural Gas from the United States The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy announces the availability for public review and comment of the Draft Addendum To Environmental Review

  1. Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents The purpose of this guidance is to assist EPA reviewers of NEPA documents in providing accurate, realistic, and consistent comments on the assessment of cumulative impacts. The guidance focuses on specific issues that are critical in EPA's review of NEPA documents under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. The guidance offers information on

  2. QER- Comment of National Propane Gas Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ladies and Gentlemen: Please find attached the QER comments of the National Propane Gas Association. Please feel to contact us if we can provide further information. Thank you for your attention to our submission.

  3. QER- Comment of ND Ethanol Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To whom it may concern, Attached please find comments from the North Dakota Ethanol Council regarding infrastructure constraints in preparation for the OER Public Meeting, which will be held in Bismarck, N.D., on August 8. Sincerely, Deana Wies

  4. QER- Comment of ALLETE Clean Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Please accept the attached comments for docketing. These are submitted on behalf of ALLETE Clean Energy. If you have any questions or need anything further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Many thanks,

  5. QER- Comment of Skibo Systems LLC

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Paul M. Klemencic, Skibo Systems LLC: Comments regarding the current state of all major energy markets, addressing customer costs and needs, infrastructure, market controls and optimization, and build out of green energy sources.

  6. Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Alerts Comments

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Alerts Comments If you have a question about Energy Citations Database Alerts, we recommend you check frequently asked questions. If your question still has not been answered or if...

  7. Approval/Variation Request Comment Sheet

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    EA15PC3041-3-0 Mar. 25, 2003 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 2 ApprovalVariation Request Comment Sheet 1. Page of 2. G APPROVAL REQUEST 3. G VARIATION REQUEST 4. ARVR No. 5. POSubcontract No....

  8. QER- Comment of Quebec Government Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, I am pleased to forward the attached QER comments on behalf of Québec’s Delegate General in New York. These comments from the Government of Québec relate to Part II of the New England Regional Infrastructure Constraints Public Meeting on April 21st, 2014. Thank you for allowing the Government of Québec to participate in this important initiative. Please do not hesitate to reach out should you have further questions. Best regards, Tim

  9. Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Qualcomm Incorporated Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated Qualcomm is pleased to provide these detailed comments to the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") on how current and future wireless broadband communications capabilities can support the energy management needs of electric utilities, businesses, and consumers, which include requirements for the evolving and growing Smart Grid. The DOE should be applauded for timely following-up on the recommendations in the

  10. Microsoft Word - UTC Comments.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of ADDRESSING POLICY AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES TO SMART GRID IMPLEMENTATION ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UTILITIES TELECOM COUNCIL The Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC") is pleased to provide the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. 1 While the RFI raises many important issues

  11. Consideration of Cumulative Impacts in EPA Review of NEPA Documents, EPA Office of Federal Activities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The purpose of this guidance is to assist EPA reviewers of NEPA documents in providing accurate, realistic, and consistent comments on the assessment of cumulative impacts. The guidance focuses on...

  12. Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Comments on reducing regulatory burden

  13. AHAM Comments_DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden July 2014_FINAL (00029367).DOC

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    8, 2014 By E-Mail Jengeih Tamba U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Ms. Tamba: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 79 Fed. Reg. 37963 (July 3, 2014). AHAM represents manufacturers of major, portable and floor care home appliances, and

  14. AHAM Comments_DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden July 2015_FINAL (00039527).DOC

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7, 2015 By E-Mail Aaron Stevenson U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Stevenson: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 79 Fed. Reg. 37963 (July 3,

  15. Microsoft Word - IIP Request for Information FINAL EEI Comments.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    October 31, 2013 Ms. Julie A. Smith Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: juliea.smith@hq.doe.gov Re: Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects, Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53436 (Aug. 29, 2013) Dear Ms. Smith: The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is pleased to provide these comments in response to the

  16. QER- Comment of William Smith III

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello DOE, Thanks for accepting my comments on the Quadrennial Energy Review by e-mail. There will be those who wish to promote nuclear energy as a source of electricity for future use in the USA. I speak against this form of energy. Because it creates long-lived radioactive wastes, nuclear power is incompatible with the biological world in which we live and from which we evolved. The lasting nature of these wastes creates a moral quandry for us in this generation, as we leave behind such biological poisons for our descents to manage, in ways which we do not yet know. A further problem with nucler energy is that any fission reaction creates plutonium, the stuff of nuclear weapons. If nuclear power reactors were to be spread around the world, inevitably the proliferation of nuclear weapons would follow. So-called '4th generation' or 'thorium' reactors suffer from a similar problem, for although they may generate less plutonium, their fuel cycle involves creation of large amounts of U-233 which carries a similar proliferation risk to plutonium-239. I advocate crafting an energy future for our nation bsed on the natural flows of renewable energy, coupled with a diversified structure which generates electricity at many smaller sources. Implicit in any modern energy system is the increased efficiency of energy usage which will continue to lower the bulk amounts of energy, particularly electricity, which our society uses to satisfy our industrial, military, commercial, and personal needs. Clearly as a nation we must participate in the worldwide effort to control the buildup of carbon dioxide gases and other pollutants which threaten the stability of the earth's climate. I would like to bring to your attention these papers from the Rocky Mountain Institute which touch on the above issues: http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/2009-09_FourNuclearMyths and http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/2012-01_FarewellToFossilFuels and http://www.rmi.org/Knowledge-Center/Library/E05-14_NuclearPowerEconomics.... If you have not yet done so, I strongly urge you to contact the Rocky Mountain Institute and contract with them for their advice in consulting on the Quadrennial Energy Review. Sincerely, William Wharton Smith III

  17. AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments Attachment to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. PDF icon AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments More Documents & Publications Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation Future Communications Needs

  18. QER- Comment of Stephen Kurkoski

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    I attended the meeting yesterday in Hartford, Conn. I thank you for the opportunity to speak during the public comment period. I thanked the moderator, Fred Hanson, for bringing up the option of Conservation and Energy Efficiency to the last panel. The following are the comments I presented. I would first like to say that the Northeast does not have an energy supply problem. The problem that we have is a demand/supply issue. If the problem is only referred to as a supply problem then only supply solutions will be looked at. When we talk about meeting our energy needs, the conversation should start with: 1st Conservation 2nd Energy Efficiency …..and if we have a concern about Climate Change 3rd Renewables 4th Polluting technologies such as Fossil Fuels and Nuclear If we do not implement this list in the above order we will leave a very different climate and a planet that is difficult to live on for our children. I would next like to illustrate the power of Conservation, Energy Efficiency and Renewables. Two years ago my wife and I had the good fortune to be chosen to participate in the National Grid Deep Energy Retrofit Pilot Program. Thank you to National Grid and the state of Massachusetts. By super insulating and air sealing our house, installing an air-source heat pump and a 2.4kW solar system, along with practicing conservation, our total energy bill for last year was $60, which equals 300 pounds of CO2 equivalent. This includes this past winter with its "polar vortex". Conservation, Efficiency and Renewables have been mentioned by a few of the presenters today. We need to bring Conservation, Efficiency and Renewables to center stage to solve our energy needs. Recommendations: 1. Institute to a greater extent "Peak Load Shaving". 2. Make it mandatory that all buildings that are built are Zero Net Energy or Zero Plus Energy. 3. Institute a more aggressive "Time of Use" Electric and Gas Metering System that Mr Reilly of the Vermont Electric Power Company mentioned earlier. 4. Put a severe Carbon Tax on all polluting Energy Producers. 5. Measure CO2 emissions for the complete cycle of extraction, transportation, storage and burning of all Energy options. 6. Remove all incentives and support for Energy Producers of Fossil Fuel and Nuclear. Thank you, Stephen Kurkoski

  19. QER- Comment of Cynthia Henshaw

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Hello, I have several comments regarding the hearing and document put together regarding infrastructure constraints in New England. 1. Why did the document not discuss the waste and losses of natural gas through existing pipeline leaks? The most cost-effective carbon savings within New England is to repair existing natural gas leaks. If we invested our dollars to upgrade existing transmission, storage and distribution capacity in New England we would not need additional gas pipelines and we'd help protect out health and the environment. These infrastructure improvements should be completed before creating more environmental damage and disruption to additional communities. 2. The best way to encourage investment in infrastructure that will address vulnerabilities is to encourage local energy production - continue to expand local solar panel use (on houses, store roofs and larger systems) and encourage continued development of alternative wind turbines that do not have the environmental and community impacts as the large turbines so that they can be cited near the electric demand. We need to take responsibility for the energy that we use. That means understanding how to generate our own electricity, and promoting conservation and energy efficiency throughout New England. 3. Tennessee Gas is proposing a new gas pipeline across the northern tier of Massachusetts. Why are they not expanding their existing infrastructure that already runs across the southern tier of the state? They already have the rights-of-way and infrastructure in place. The company has not been forthcoming with answers, which sows seeds of distrust. If the company, and federal and state regulators want to increase pipeline capacity then answers to reasonable questions need to be given. AND the public needs to have more than ONE WEEK to provide questions. 4. The Tennessee Gas Pipeline proposed for the northern tier of Massachusetts targets existing conservation infrastructure that was protected for a wide variety of public goods and services. However a gas pipeline that disrupts the soil, air and water was NOT one of the reasons. This proposed pipeline route intentionally targets these areas. This is unacceptable! Thank you for considering my questions and comments. Cynthia Henshaw

  20. QER- Comment of MWH Global

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Was looking at the calendar and curious when the “Final Meeting” is in DC for the QER? http://energy.gov/epsa/initiatives/quadrennial-energy-review-qer Thanks,

  1. QER- Comment of Katy Eiseman 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Commissioner Cash, Thank you for responding. By the way, congratulations on your new position at DEP. I am an Amherst High School graduate, and it's always nice to see western Mass. representation in Boston. I will make sure that the progressives I am in touch with across the state understand where you stand on the natural gas question. I am sorry if I misrepresented your point of view. Sincerely, Katy Eiseman On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Cash, David (DEP) wrote: Dear Katy, Thank you for your engagement in this issue – so crucial right now in terms of protecting our environment for the future and growing our economy. I would like to take this opportunity to correct what appears to be a misunderstanding in your email below about what I presented. I DO believe that through the committed work of the legislature, Governor Patrick and the Secretary of Energy and Environment, Rick Sullivan, we have charted a course that will achieve the 80% reduction of GHGs below 1990 levels by 2050 required by our Global Warming Solutions Act. Our transition to a more energy efficient economy and our unleashing of renewable energy has been a transformative game-changer and the envy of other states and even countries. However, during my presentation, I never said nor implied that we do not still need new fossil fuel infrastructure in the near term in order to balance the expected influx of intermittent wind and solar, keep energy prices reasonable, and maintain grid reliability. In fact, I made clear that near term investments in new infrastructure will better enable the more rapid and sustainable transition to renewable and energy efficiency that is required to address climate change and continue to grow clean energy jobs and protect ratepayers. Thanks. Sincerely, David =========================== David W. Cash, Ph.D. Commissioner Department of Environmental Protection Commonwealth of Massachusetts One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 Phone: (617) 292-5856 email: david.cash@state.ma.us MassDEP on Twitter: https://twitter.com/massdep MassDEP on the Web: http://mass.gov/dep MassDEP's e-Newsletter and/or Regulations updates: http://mass.gov/dep/signup From: Katy Eiseman Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 11:09 AM To: QERcomments@hq.doe.gov Cc: Kulik, Stephen - Rep. (HOU); benjamin.downing@masenate.gov; internet, env (ENV); Cooper, Stephanie (ENV); Cash, David (DEP); Sullivan, Rick (EEA); Berwick, Ann (DPU); goffice@state.ma.us Subject: Quadrennial Energy Review - New England Infrastructure Constraints To members of the QER Task Force: Thank you for taking time to address energy concerns for our region. Here is my brief comment: We do not need more fossil fuel infrastructure. Natural gas has served its purpose as a bridge fuel here, and new gas infrastructure now will act as a raised drawbridge, holding back investments in renewables. Subsidies that would be going to the natural gas industry via the proposed tariff on our electric bills (http://www.nescoe.com/uploads/ISO_assistance_Trans___Gas_1_21_14_final.pdf) should be directed to sustainable, renewable sources and to the development of electrical storage capacity for those sources. Our new DEP Commissioner, David Cash, has put together a very compelling presentation on New England's ability to power itself solely with renewable sources. Please see http://netransition.org/net-zero-new-england/ It is unfortunate that we are learning about this important meeting during the holiest week of the year for many Americans. Most who care about this issue will not have time to comment thoughtfully. I trust that there will be ample opportunity for the public and our elected and appointed representatives to weigh these matters very carefully, as they impact the viability of life on this planet. Thank you, Katy Eiseman

  2. QER- Comment of James Bennett

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, The notice for the April 21 meeting was too short. The April 15 letter just found its way to me. I hope that there will be more such focused meetings in the not too distant future. If possible, please add me to your notification email list for such meetings. Comments: There is increasing conern over the routing and purpose of additional Natural Gas Pipelines in Massachusetts. There is skepticism that the pipelines will be used for export and that the any improvement in the Energy supply for New England will be shortlived due to a rapid depletion of reserves. In other words, why tear up the landscape with little benefit to the region. If the pipelines are contructed, can a restraint be placed on them to prevent export? Have the impacts of leaks and fires been properly considered? New England has heavily forrested areas and we have been having more frequent exteremly dry summers. At least one pipeline route has been suggested that would run through large wooded areas. A pipeline initiated fire would be devestating. Sincerely, Jim Bennett

  3. QER- Comment of Philip Saunders

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Sir/Madam: Please oppose the Northeast Expansion of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline. For reasons having to do with climate change, which I don't need to explain to you, it is not in our interest to be enabling further carbon combustion here or anywhere else in the world. Natural gas is not needed in Mass. as a "bridge" fuel. Mass. is making good progress toward lowering CO2 emissions, and with continued declines in the cost of photovoltaic installations, changes in net meter regulations, and expansion of offshore wind power, Mass. can produce enough renewable energy to replace the electric power lost from the closure of coal-fired plants. To the extent that gas through the proposed pipeline will be exported, I see no reason for Mass. to bear the burden of providing natural gas to China and others. The pipeline would inevitably go through wetlands, conservation land, land trust land, and agriculturally restricted land, which owners, donors, and taxpayers have gone to great lengths and expense over the generations to protect. All of this would be undone and wasted, merely so Kinder Morgan could increase its bottom line. We'd be paying the price and they would be reaping the profit. Federal approvals for the project should be withheld. Thank you for allowing me to comment. Very truly yours, Philip Saunders, Jr., Ph.D. ___________________________ PHILIP SAUNDERS ASSOCIATES Economic and Financial Analysis

  4. QER- Comment of Debra Walworth

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To Whom It May Concern: I want to state upfront that my name is the only thing I want disclosed in my comments--please do not disclose my address or any other personal contact information to the extent to the law. I attended the QER in North Dakota, and want to thank the entire delegation for coming to North Dakota. I found it very interesting and informative. I would like to support the basic idea of a complete energy package that includes oil, coal, wind, solar and bio-fuels. I understand that coal and oil are under a lot of scrutiny for environmental affects. However, we (as a country) are not in a position to stop the use of any of our energy resources. At this point in time, to do so, in my opinion, would be harmful to our country's national security. I feel the dramatic mandates being placed on coal to make other energy resources competitive, is counter-intuitive to national security and future development of alternative energy resources. North Dakota has lead the nation in environmental strategies for clean air, clean water, and clean environment. We also produce a lot of energy from coal. I think the national energy policy should take common sense steps towards the national energy policy that includes all energy resources, instead of knee-jerk reactions from misunderstood and lop-sided actions. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on this very important topic. Sincerely, Debra Walworth

  5. Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules February 17, 2011 - 5:29pm ...

  6. Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-06-1,...

  7. H-Prize Draft Guideline Comments Deadline Extended to Monday...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    H-Prize Draft Guideline Comments Deadline Extended to Monday, April 28 H-Prize Draft Guideline Comments Deadline Extended to Monday, April 28 April 22, 2014 - 2:00pm Addthis The...

  8. PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER - DOE IS BUSH CHENEY SCUM...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER - DOE IS BUSH CHENEY SCUM COUNTRY THESE DAYS - WE NEED ... PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER - DOE IS BUSH CHENEY SCUM COUNTRY THESE DAYS - WE NEED ...

  9. Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Burden RFI_July 2015_FINAL (00039560) More Documents & Publications Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012)

  10. 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program has posted the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, which summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR) held June 1620, 2014, in Washington, D.C.

  11. Biomass Program 2007 Program Peer Review - Biochemical and Products Platform Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2009-10-27

    This document discloses the comments provided by a review panel at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program Peer Review held on November 15-16, 2007 in Baltimore, MD and the Biochemical and Products Platform Review held on August 7-9, 2007 in Denver, Colorado.

  12. Power North America RFI Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    North America RFI Comments Power North America RFI Comments Power North America RFI Comments: Under most regulatory rules and policies in the U.S., utilities are incentivized to making the lowest cost investment which yields the highest return in the case of shareowner companies, the least immediate rate impacts for municipal utilities and the longest potential payback for rural electric coops. PDF icon Power North America RFI Comments More Documents & Publications Browning: Email in

  13. Hanford Advisory Board Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings Welcome to this Hanford Advisory Board meeting. The Board appreciates this opportunity to hear your views and comments on Hanford cleanup activities. Your comments will be summarized in the Board meeting minutes. Board meetings are also routinely audio-recorded. If you wish, you may at any time provide written comments to the Board at: Hanford Advisory Board c/o EnviroIssues Hanford Project Office 713 Jadwin #3 Richland, Washington 99352

  14. QER - Comment of Dairyland Power Cooperative - FWD by John Richards |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Dairyland Power Cooperative - FWD by John Richards QER - Comment of Dairyland Power Cooperative - FWD by John Richards From: Richards, John Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:01 PM To: QERcomments Subject: FW: DPC written comments Attachment: 2014.08.08 Dairyland Power Cooperative written comments for Chicago QER session.pdf From: Richards, John Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 5:28 PM To: 'ashikany@energetics.com' Subject: Fw: DPC written comments From: Sean L Craig

  15. Draft Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment Draft Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment Green Grid Gateway @ North Coast Oregon. America's First Smart Grid R&D Testing Business Campus PDF icon Draft Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment More Documents & Publications Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Smart

  16. WIPP RCRA Documents - Class 2 Mods for comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    RCRA Public Comments Menu Public Invited to Comment on Permit Modifications The public is invited to comment on the following proposed modifications to the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Comments should be directed via e-mail to Ricardo.Maestas@state.nm.us or by regular mail to: Mr. Ricardo Maestas New Mexico Environment Department Hazardous Waste Bureau 2905 Rodeo Park Drive, Building E Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 Temporary Authorization Requests: Temporary

  17. QER- Comment of Association of Oil Pipe Lines

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached AOPL's comments to DOE's safety discussion in preparation for the New Orleans, LA public meeting. Thanks, John

  18. Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Comms Requirements |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Comms Requirements Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Comms Requirements Comments of Silver Spring Networks on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Comms Requirements More Documents & Publications Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Data Access NBP RFI: Communications Requirements-

  19. Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Motorola, Inc. Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. Reply comments from Motorola, Inc. on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. More Documents & Publications Comments of Motorola, Inc. Re: DOE Request for Information - Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart

  20. Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Comments made on behalf of the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM), on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (Sept. 17, 2010). PDF icon Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy And Logistical Challenges. November 1, 2010 More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE

  1. Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Nuclear Damage | Department of Energy NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage ENERGYSOLUTIONS' Comment in Response to Notice of Inquiry, Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation -75 FR 43945 PDF icon Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage More Documents & Publications Public comment re

  2. From: Cutting, John To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Cutting, John To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David Cc: Buechler, John; Duffy, Timothy; Patka, Carl; Regulatory Affairs Subject: NYISO comments re: draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:29:46 PM Attachments: 20141020_NYISO_Comments_DOE_Congestion_Study.pdf Please find attached above the comments of the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. regarding the draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. John C. Cutting Regulatory

  3. From: Henderson, Michael To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Henderson, Michael To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David Cc: Doe, Stanley; Kowalski, Richard; Paradise, Theodore Subject: DOE Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 10:12:20 AM Attachments: image001.png ISO New England is pleased to provide comments on the public draft of the DOE Congestion Study. The ISO appreciates DOE's consideration of several specific comments shown in red below. Comments: Figure ES-2: It is possible to identify the consistent impacts of a few specific

  4. From: Tunnell, Andrew To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Southern Companies" Comments to Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:17:22 PM Attachments: balch_logof0638c DOE Congestion Comments.pdf In accordance with the Department of Energy's instructions provided at: http://www.energy.gov/oe/downloads/national-congestion-study-notice-public-comment-federal- register-notice-volume-79-no, find attached Southern Companies' comments regarding the draft Transmission National Electric Congestion Study that

  5. Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment for Installation of a Renewable Energy Anaerobic Digester Facility at the University of California, Davis in Yolo County, California. PDF icon Request for Public and Agency Comments More Documents & Publications Floodplain Assessment and Statement of Findings Floodplain

  6. How to Participate or Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Appliance & Equipment Standards » Rulemakings & Notices » How to Participate or Comment How to Participate or Comment The Department of Energy (DOE) encourages stakeholders and the general public to participate in its rulemakings. You can participate in rulemakings by: Viewing Federal Register notices, supporting documents, and public comments in the rulemaking docket found on Regulations.gov By submitting comments to the docket By attending public meetings or participating in webinars

  7. Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute in response to DOE' s July 27, 2010 Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comment (Notice) regarding implementation of Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Act). PDF icon Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking More Documents & Publications Exelon response CSC_Extension.PDF Memorandum

  8. Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC More Documents & Publications Current Communications Needs Future Communications Needs NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy- Comments of Oncor

  9. Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric onImplementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Great River Energy Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies NBP RFI:

  10. Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority More Documents & Publications Lower Colorado River Authority Lower Colorado River Authority NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light

  11. DOE Comments - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) DOE Comments - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) PDF icon 1. United States Department of Energy Comments on "Application of Protective Action Guides (PAGs) for Radiological Dispersal Devices (RDD) and Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) Incidents"; Notice (71 FR 174; January 3, 2006) PDF icon 2. Department of Energy Comments on NCRP SC 64-23 Draft Report PDF icon 3. DOE Comments on: "Uniform Federal Policy for Quality

  12. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Council | Department of Energy Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby files its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) request for information on the communications needs of electric utilities and other such critical infrastructure industries (CII). The comments on the record- including those by APPA, EEI and NRECA, as well as API -

  13. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Company | Department of Energy Baltimore Gas & Electric Company NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company More Documents & Publications Comments of

  14. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Tacoma Public NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public Comments of Tacoma Public on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public More Documents & Publications Comments of Utilities Telecom Council Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies NBP RFI: Communications

  15. EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Meetings | Department of Energy Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping Meetings EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping Meetings Jordan Cove Liquefaction Project (Coos County, OR) and Pacific Connector Pipeline Project (Coos, Klamath, Jackson, and Douglas Counties, OR) FERC announces the extension of the public comment periond and additional scoping meetings. The comment period has been extended from September 4, 2012 to October 29, 2012. For more

  16. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Cooperative- Minnesota | Department of Energy Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota More

  17. Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report. Final: Comments and Responses to Comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1999-02-01

    This document is the Comments and Responses to Comments volume of the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project (Final EIS/EIR). This volume of the Final EIS/EIR provides copies of the written comments received on the Draft EIS/EIR and the leady agency responses to those comments in conformance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

  18. QER- Comment of Andrea Wert

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, I attended the event "Electricity in Transition" at CSIS on May 8th where Ms. Melanie Kenderdine spoke. I was hoping to review the powerpoint Ms. Kenderdine used in her presentation on the Adminstration’s QER. Would it be possible to obtain a copy of that presentation? Thank you! Best, Andrea Wert

  19. Draft Letter on the Final Report of the Commission to review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This draft letter of the National Laboratory Task Force transmits the comments of its National Laboratories Task Force on thefinal report of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL).

  20. Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing | Department of Energy Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Docket No. EO-05-01: In accordance with Order No. 202-06-1, issued by the

  1. Union Temporal de Empresas UTE | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Temporal de Empresas UTE Jump to: navigation, search Name: Union Temporal de Empresas (UTE) Place: Spain Sector: Solar Product: Developer of PV solar parks. References: Union...

  2. QER- Comment of PSEG Services Corporation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the comments and responses of the PSEG Companies (Public Service Electric and Gas Company, PSEG Power LLC and PSEG Long Island LLC) to the questions raised by the U.S. Department of Energy. Should you have any questions or problems regarding the attached document, please do not hesitate to contact me.

  3. QER- Comment of Portland General Electric

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thanks, Karen. As per our email exchange earlier this week, we're attaching prepared comments from PGE to support the statement Jim Piro offered at the QER public meeting in Portland this past summer. We appreciate your flexibility on the submission deadline! Please let me know if you need anything else from us.

  4. QER- Comment of Stephen Arthur 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    I was simply curious about the preliminary reports about the final meeting of the QER. I know the deadline for public comments is quickly approaching and was wondering if the last meeting in New York, Iowa, and final meeting in Washington D.C. were still going to occur? Thank you. Sincerely, Stephen Arthur

  5. QER- Comment of Western Environmental Law Center

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To whom it may concern, I provided the following comments at the public meeting in Santa Fe, NM on 8/11/14: My name is Thomas Singer, and I am a Senior Policy Advisor at the Western Environmental Law Center.

  6. QER- Comment of Allen Young 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Here is a comment from me on the issue of energy infrastructure in Massachusetts. I will address only one issue: the proposed Kinder Morgan pipelines from Albany to Dracut. I am absolutely opposed to the construction of this pipeline and here are my reasons

  7. QER- Comment of State Energy Advisory Board

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Melanie: As you are aware, QER is an area of focus for STEAB and we are working directly with EPSA on it. Attached, please find a copy of the State Energy Advisory Board's response to the Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.

  8. QER- Comment of Industrial Energy Consumer Group

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thanks Tony. We'll be announcing dates for a number of other meetings in the next few days so hopefully you'll be able to participate in one of those, or have some of your member companies join. Regards, Karen Karen G. Wayland, Ph.D. Deputy Director for State, Local and Tribal Cooperation Energy Policy and Systems Analysis U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20585 Phone: +1 (202) 586-1347 Cell: +1 (240) 751-8483 From: Buxton, Anthony W. Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 11:44 AM To: Wayland, Karen Subject: Re: Save the Date: June 19 QER meeting on Water-Energy Nexus Thank you, Karen. Our participation in the Providence hearing was a very positive and useful experience. IECG will be unable to attend the San Francisco hearing for obvious reasons, though it is always a temptation. IECG appreciates the effort going into and the significance of the Review and will continue to observe and comment as appropriate. We have become increasingly concerned recently about whether the Federal Power Act and related statutes provide adequate authority for the federal government and related energy institutions ( NERC) to take the actions necessary to ensure the supply of energy to America on a reliable and low cost basis. The decision of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals invalidating FERC's Order 750 and the consequent challenges to Order 1000 on the same basis exemplify this difficulty. The states are generally without adequate powers and legal authority as well, save for several large states. The RTOs are an ongoing answer from FERC, but they also are limited by the Federal Power Act. We urge attention to this important issue. Thank you again for your New England hearings and for your excellent work. Tony Buxton Counsel to Industrial Energy Consumer Group. From: Wayland, Karen [mailto:Karen.Wayland@Hq.Doe.Gov] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 11:22 AM Eastern Standard Time To: Wayland, Karen Subject: Save the Date: June 19 QER meeting on Water-Energy Nexus Thank you for your interest in the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), and apologies for any duplicate emails. The next stakeholders meeting for the QER will focus on the Water-Energy Nexus. The meeting will be held at the San Francisco City Hall on June 19 at 9 am. Doors open at 8 am. We will be posting an agenda and background memo on the QER website over the next week at http://www.energy.gov/epsa/events/qer-public-meeting-water-energy-nexus, so check back regularly. We encourage you to attend and participate, and to share the meeting information with your lists. Please note that we are extending the comment period for stakeholders during the open mic session from 3 minutes (as described in the Federal Register notice) to 5 minutes to give stakeholders adequate time to make substantive statements. We look forward to hearing from you! Information on past meetings, including panelists' statements and summaries of discussions, as well the list of upcoming meetings, can be found at www.energy.gov/qer. Regards, Karen Wayland Karen G. Wayland, Ph.D. Deputy Director for State, Local and Tribal Cooperation Energy Policy and Systems Analysis U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20585 In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we hereby advise you that if this E-mail or any attachment hereto contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service. This E-Mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential and / or exempt from discovery or disclosure under applicable law. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and have received it in error, please do not distribute it and notify me immediately by E-mail at abuxton@preti.com or via telephone at 207.791.3000 and delete the original message. Unless expressly stated in this e-mail, nothing in this message or any attachment should be construed as a digital or electronic signature or as a legal opinion.

  9. SuppCompensationNuclearDamage_ExtensionComments.PDF | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    SuppCompensationNuclearDamage_ExtensionComments.PDF SuppCompensationNuclearDamage_ExtensionComments.PDF PDF icon SuppCompensationNuclearDamage_ExtensionComments.PDF More Documents & Publications CSC_Extension.PDF Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments.

  10. QER- Comment of Ali Mansoori

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Martha, I wonder if this Public Meeting will be broadcast on any internet website? I am quite interested to watch and hear the happenings in it since I will be away from Chicago on August 8, 2014. For your information my group at UIC have been very active on various aspects of energy and nanotechnology. Best, Ali Dr. G.Ali Mansoori, PhD Professor of Chemical and Bio Engineering & Physics University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607-7052 USA A Review of Non-Renewable Energy Options in Illinois Int. J. Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, Vol.6, No.3, pp.288-347, 2013. Fouling in Petroleum & Natural Gas Industries ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Peter Nelson Date: Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:02 PM Subject: Fwd: Quadrennial Energy Review Public Meeting at UIC 8/8 To: FYI, I just received notice of this. It is a public meeting so anyone is welcome to attend. Two cabinet and members and the mayor ... impressive! Pete Begin forwarded message: From: "Gutierrez, Martha" Date: July 31, 2014 5:57:42 PM CDT To: "Allen-Meares, Paula", "Holly, Sharlene" Cc: "Redding, Michael", "Pagano, Michael", "Bills-Windt, Caryn", "Schlickman, Stephen", "Gutierrez, Martha", "Pyatt, Jonathan S (UIUC)", "Soto Plutz, Teresita", "Donovan, Mark", "Nelson, Peter", "Dutta, Mitra" Subject: Quadrennial Energy Review Public Meeting at UIC 8/8 Dear Paula, The U.S. Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz and U.S. Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx; Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and other members of Congress and/or agency heads (names TBA) will be at UIC Student Center East, Illinois B Room on Friday, August 8th at 8:30 am to conduct a public meeting on the Quadrennial Energy review (QER). The Quadrennial Energy Review (QER) is a year-long review of the nation's infrastructure for energy transmission, distribution and storage. They are holding public meetings around the country to get input from stakeholders. The QER report will contain policy recommendations for improving our energy infrastructure. The Department of Energy has requested your participation in delivering welcoming remarks, faculty to serve as panelist's and for UIC community to be invited to the meeting. We have provided recommendations and are awaiting their confirmation of our list by tomorrow morning. Once we receive confirmation, we can extend invitations and promote meeting to the campus community. Please visit website for additional background information. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/07/14/2014-16396/quadrenni... We hope to be in touch tomorrow with final details. Thank you, Marty Gutierrez Senior Director Office of Public and Government Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago Peter C. Nelson, Ph.D. Dean of Engineering University of Illinois at Chicago www.engr.uic.edu -- Dr. G.Ali Mansoori, PhD Professor of Chemical and Bio Engineering & Physics DEPARTMENT OF BIOENGINEERING University of Illinois at Chicago Room 218 Science and Engineering Offices 851 S. Morgan St. (M/C 063), Chicago, IL 60607-7052

  11. TEMPORAL SELF-ORGANIZATION IN GALAXY FORMATION

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cen, Renyue

    2014-04-20

    We report on the discovery of a relation between the number of star formation (SF) peaks per unit time, ?{sub peak}, and the size of the temporal smoothing window function, ?t, used to define the peaks: ?{sub peak}??t {sup 1} {sup } {sup ?} (? ? 1.618). This relation holds over the range of ?t = 10-1000Myr that can be reliably computed here, using a large sample of galaxies obtained from a state-of-the-art cosmological hydrodynamic simulation. This means that the temporal distribution of SF peaks in galaxies as a population is fractal with a Hausdorff fractal dimension equal to ? 1. This finding reveals, for the first time, that the superficially chaotic process of galaxy formation is underlined by temporal self-organization up to at least one gigayear. It is tempting to suggest that, given the known existence of spatial fractals (such as the power-law two-point function of galaxies), there is a joint spatio-temporal self-organization in galaxy formation. From an observational perspective, it will be urgent to devise diagnostics to probe the SF histories of galaxies with good temporal resolution to facilitate a test of this prediction. If confirmed, it would provide unambiguous evidence for a new picture of galaxy formation that is interaction driven, cooperative, and coherent in and between time and space. Unravelling its origin may hold the key to understanding galaxy formation.

  12. Quadrennial Energy Review: Public Stakeholder Meeting

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Review: Public Stakeholder Meeting Aug. 8, 2014 Comments by Marty Hettel, Senior Manager of Waterway Regulatory Programs, AEP River Operations Good Morning: Thank you for the opportunity to address you today. In 2012, the Inland Waterway Industry delivered 565 million tons of commodities. Commodities that keep the lights on, products that power our vehicles, materials used to produce products that we use in our day-to-day lives, products that build America, and grains that we export to feed the

  13. QER- Comment of Bill Sackett

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Quadrennial Energy Review: The health of the people of our nation is a major vulnerability that must be addressed in any energy policy. Pollution produced by generating energy impacts our overall health. To encourage healthful sources of energy we have to make sure that the true costs of energy are paid up front. This means not allowing energy development that produces dangerous pollutants. Coal burning causes asthma and mercury poisoning and contributes to climate change that is not priced into energy generated by coal. Allowing liability exemptions to energy producers hides true costs. Nuclear power producers must be accountable for any radiation sickness that resulting from their operations. Fracking must not be exempted from safe drinking water regulations. Even more significant for oil and gas production, hazardous wastes (including methane) generated by exploration and production must be regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). (Pertinent to this, please enter into the Quadrennial Energy Review proceedings the attached first three pages of an article about RCRA. The full article can be found at http://npaper-wehaa.com/boulder-weekly/2014/03/13/?article=2174620.) Removing exemptions like these will allow clean forms of energy to predominate to the overall benefit of us all. Let us not be guilty of the moral cowardice of business as usual that will cause tremendous problems for future generations. Thank you, Bill Sackett

  14. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Main Report Exhibits.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    This Volume is a part of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Columbia River System. This volume contains technical exhibits of cultural resources and commentary on the (System Operation Review) SOR process. The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation comment is the majority of the material in the volume, in the Consultation Plan, Identification of trust resources; Criteria for the selection of a System Operating Strategy; comment on rights protection and implementation of Federal Trust responsibility; analysis of the draft EIS. Comment by other Native American Tribes and groups is also included: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Spokane Tribe of Indians; Coeur d` Alene tribe.

  15. Electrically actuatable temporal tristimulus-color device

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Koehler, Dale R. (1332 Wagontrain Dr., Albuquerque, NM 87123)

    1992-01-01

    The electrically actuated light filter operates in a cyclical temporal mode to effect a tristimulus-color light analyzer. Construction is based on a Fabry-Perot interferometer comprised of a high-speed movable mirror pair and cyclically powered electrical actuators. When combined with a single vidicon tube or a monochrome solid state image sensor, a temporally operated tristimulus-color video camera is effected. A color-generated is accomplished when constructed with a companion light source and is a flicker-free colored-light source for transmission type display systems. Advantages of low cost and small physical size result from photolithographic batch-processing manufacturability.

  16. Quadrennial Energy Review Public Meeting | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Addthis On Friday, April 11, 2014, the Department of Energy hosted the first meeting to gather public comment regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review. The meeting included remarks from Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and Dr. John P. Holdren, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, followed by statements from members of Congress and two panel discussions. View All Videos

  17. Commercial Lighting Solutions Webtool Peer Review Report, Office Solutions

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Beeson, Tracy A.; Jones, Carol C.

    2010-02-01

    The Commercial Lighting Solutions (CLS) project directly supports the U.S. Department of Energys Commercial Building Energy Alliance efforts to design high performance buildings. CLS creates energy efficient best practice lighting designs for widespread use, and they are made available to users via an interactive webtool that both educates and guides the end user through the application of the Lighting Solutions. This report summarizes the peer review of the CLS webtool for offices. The methodology for the peer review process included data collection (stakeholder input), analysis of the comments, and organization of the input into categories for prioritization of the comments against a set of criteria. Based on this process, recommendations were developed for the release of version 2.0 of the webtool at the Lightfair conference in Las Vegas in May 2010. The report provides a list of the top ten most significant and relevant improvements that will be made within the webtool for version 2.0 as well as appendices containing the comments and short-term priorities in additional detail. Peer review comments that are considered high priority by the reviewers and the CLS team but cannot be completed for Version 2.0 are listed as long-term recommendations.

  18. QER- Comment of Rachel Branch

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    April 20, 2014 I hereby respectfully request that the Department of Energy Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force on the Infrastructure Constraints in New England oppose any new development or building of any more fossil fuel infrastructure and only allow the repair of existing infrastructure that is absolutely necessary as we transition to sustainable, renewable sources. Further, I respectfully request that any and all subsidies, tax incentives and/or tax exemptions hereinafter be appropriated and/or directed only to sustainable, renewable sources, i. e., solar, wind, and hydro energy, and development of electrical storage capacities for those sustainable and renewable sources. I further request that any funds spent to push for fossil fuel infrastructure be transparent to the general public. As you are holding meetings in Providence and Hartford, when will your meeting in Massachusetts be scheduled so that Commonwealth of Massachusetts residents can participate? Respectfully submitted, Rachel I. Branch

  19. Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents (EPA, 1999)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The purpose of this guidance is to assist EPA reviewers of NEPA documents in providing accurate, realistic, and consistent comments on the assessment of cumulative impacts. The guidance focuses on specific issues that are critical in EPA's review of NEPA documents under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. The guidance offers information on what issues to look for in the analysis, what practical considerations should be kept in mind when reviewing the analysis, and what should be said in EPA comments concerning the adequacy of the analysis.

  20. Summary of the FY 2005 Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Research Program Annual Review

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the FY 2005 Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Research Program Annual Review May 31-June 2, 2005 Berkeley, CA August 2005 U.S. Department of Energy Office of FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies August 8, 2005 Dear Colleague: This document presents a summary of the evaluation and comments provided by the review panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) program annual review. The review was held at the

  1. Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Environment | Department of Energy Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment Policy and Procedures for the Review of Federal Actions Impacting the Environment This manual establishes policies and procedures for carrying out the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities to review and comment on Federal actions affecting the quality of the environment. PDF icon G-EPA-reviewing_federal_actions.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy and

  2. Draft Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance Available for Public Comment

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a Notice of Public Comment in the Federal Register, inviting the public to comment on DOE's Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance. The document is available for a 30 day comment period.

  3. QER- Comment of Janice Kurkoski

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Proposal for Conservation Reward Rate for Electricity First of all, thank you for the time you are taking to hear from the public along with the industry and government officials in this critical matter. I attended the public hearing in Hartford CT two days ago and was able to comment on parts of what we are proposing here. We are writing to open a conversation with you about a proposal that we have been discussing in our past meetings. We would like to see you initiate legislation that would mandate a "stepped rate" for electricity, under which consumers who used less would pay a lower rate per kilowatt hour than those who used more. Background North Quabbin Energy is a community group from the nine North Quabbin towns in north central Massachusetts that focuses on education and local action relating to ways to conserve energy and support local and regional enterprises that reduce our dependence on imported resources. The towns are Athol, Orange, Petersham, Royalston, Warwick, Wendell, New Salem, Erving and Phillipston. Our members include representatives from the appointed Energy Committees of these towns. For the past six years, we have participated in many different types of events and activities, always with an emphasis on the idea that the single best way to address the high financial, social, and environmental costs of our current energy use patterns is to consume less energy in the first place. What we have discovered in our community work is that most people seem aware of the reasons for conserving energy (lowering greenhouse gas emissions, saving money, reducing dependence on oil and other imported resources, etc.). Many are also knowledgeable about the basic weatherization and conservation strategies that utilities, municipalities, and community groups like ours try to promote (for example, adding insulation to homes, turning thermostats down, or using fluorescent or LED lighting rather than incandescent bulbs). Yet except when energy prices are extraordinarily high, it appears that there is a great deal of inertia among the general public about actually making changes in their energy consumption patterns. This proposal would address that issue of inertia by creating a direct incentive program for using less electricity. People could very quickly and easily make changes that would lower their electric use, and would see immediate results on their electric bills. Comparable programs Many utilities are beginning to offer peak and off-peak metering as a way to equalize demand on the electric grid, but although this is useful in making people more aware of their energy use patterns, it does nothing to reduce overall demand and may actually encourage more wasteful consumption at off-peak times. A few utilities are starting to offer the kind of stepped rate or rewards program that we are proposing. For example, Western Massachusetts Electric Company recently inaugurated a program that awards "points" (redeemable for consumer items) for the numbers of kilowatt hours saved. In our opinion, this kind of program sends the wrong message because it encourages people to save in one area (electricity use) in order to consume in another. Examples of programs more in line with what we are proposing already exist. One is British Columbia Hydro's "Conservation Rate," started in April 2010. Under their Residential Conservation Rate, customers pay 7.52 cents per kWh for the first 1,350 kWh they use over an average two-month billing period. Above that amount, customers pay 11.27 cents per kWh for the balance of the electricity used during the billing period. In nearby Vermont, the Washington Electric Cooperative has had stepped or tiered rates for years. They reward residential users with a relatively very low rate of 9.43 cents per kWhr for the first 200 kWhrs, and then charge a significantly higher rate of 21.06 cents thereafter. As a result, their customers use on average about 11% less than the households in our area. Points for discussion What might be a reasonable target figure for the stepped rate? The current Massachusetts average is about 610 kWh/month. Members of North Quabbin Energy have demonstrated that it is quite possible to use a half or even a third of that amount without any decline in standard or quality of living1. In fact, this level of reduction is imperative given the seriousness of climate change and resource depletion. How could this change best be promoted to the public? We would argue that this is not a rate increase, but rather a rate redistribution that rewards lower energy consumption. It seems important to emphasize the positive rewards of this kind of change, rather than framing it as a penalty for higher use2. It also seems crucial to demonstrate from the outset that reducing a household's electric use can be done with surprising ease, given a greater awareness of how much energy waste can be avoided with a change in behavior. How could the concerns of low-income customers, those with large families, or those who heat exclusively with electricity be addressed? The BCHydro and Washington Electric Cooperative programs provide useful models for addressing these questions, and there is a great deal of regional data that shows how these consumers would by no means be penalized in the kind of pricing structure we are proposing. What programs could be funded with the increased revenues? Public outrage would be justified if the money went into the general coffers of the utility companies and fossil fuel energy supply and distribution companies. Enhanced conservation programs should be the target of these revenues. Attachments: 1 NQE individual.pdf, 2 NQE proposed incentive rate Note - if attachments do not go through, see this web page for these documents: http://northquabbinenergy.org/wordpress/?page_id=205

  4. QER- Comment of Liberty Goodwin

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    As suggested by Sen. Jack Reed, below and attached are my comments on energy policy for now and the future: ***************************************************************************** AN OUTLINE FOR PRACTICAL & FRUITFUL ENERGY DEVELOPMENT WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO SENSIBLE PUBLIC INVESTMENT (Thoughts on intelligent action for energy that is abundant, affordable, associated with many jobs and economic health in New England and the nation) ** CLINGING TO OUTMODED & DESTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES – WE DON'T NEED TO ARGUE ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE TO SEE THE WAY FORWARD 1. Fossil fuels and nuclear have clear and present dangers and damaging effects, on human and environmental health. This includes the uncontestable pollution involved in production and use, and the risks of greater disasters, along with concerns about toxic waste that can contaminate our water and more. 2. Renewable sources offer a vast number of possibilities for energy production for a variety of uses. To not explore them is wasteful. To stick to same-old, same-old is foolish, and will leave us at the rear of the pack re: future energy development. **SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL – LESS RISKY – MORE PRODUCTIVE – MORE LOCAL 1 Solyndra is the bad apple that makes the point. Because something costs millions, or even billions of dollars doesn't mean it is the way to achieve huge results. The only thing that is huge about propping up mega-corporations is the risk. 2 Making the money available in far smaller amounts to a variety of solar efforts is both less risky and more promising – gives more chance of positive results. And, to anyone who can do the math – millions of small installations is as productive as one giant. 3 Smaller projects tend to be more labor-intensive – and offer local employment in a bunch of different places, benefiting the economies of all. **BENEFICIAL INNOVATION IS NOT BORN IN A CORPORATE THINK TANK, BUT IN THE MINDS OF INDIVIDUAL GENIUSES. 1. History tells us that great inventions have been developed by unknowns working in garages, bike shops, etc. We need to look beyond the elite in corporate money tanks and prestigious academia to find the gems in our own backyards. 2. One such, Paul Klinkman, has at least 50 inventions on hand, is developing several, has one patent and a few more in process, most related to alternative energy production. 3. The point is that we would find many like him – if we would only look. 4. Also, we should be seeking not just new technologies, but new business models. Check out the example from our greenhouse flyer, below. **SAVVY INVESTORS DON'T PUT THE BULK OF THEIR FORTUNES IN JUST A COUPLE OF STOCKS. THEY SPREAD THE RISK BY DIVERSIFYING. LET US BE LIKEWISE SMART IN USE OF PUBLIC MONEY 1 "Renewable energy" is not just about electricity, or even that and hot water. It is not even just those and wind, and certainly more than "solar panels". 2 We need to explore and use the many different types of alternatives, just as we do in most other aspects of our society. 3 Taking the kind of money that was allocated to Solyndra (or even to 38 Studios here in Rhode Island, and instead investing it in even 10 small projects, is a much wiser choice than betting it on another big boondoggle. **WHAT TO DO? PUT OUR MONEY INTO SUPPORT FOR WIDESPREAD USE OF CURRENT "GREEN" ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, AND EVALUATION & DEVELOPMENT OF NEW, TRULY INNOVATIVE OPTIONS 1 Make renewable energy credits available for all solar, wind and other technologies that show promise for meeting our energy needs. 2 Consider setting up an Important Innovations Center like the one described on the other side. TWO EXAMPLES OF NEW & EXCITING RESEARCH & BUSINESS MODELS A. PROPOSED NEW KSD NON-PROFIT IMPORTANT INNOVATIONS CENTER PURPOSES **Provide a place where small inventors can get help in evaluating and developing their ideas. **Provide a place which will focus specifically on inventions that have the potential to benefit the world and its people. **Provide a place which will especially focus on solutions to energy needs – and to environmental pollution and other damage. **Provide a place to enable people interested in doing good rather than getting rich to network and cooperate on accomplishing this kind of change in our world. MEANS **Invite ideas to be submitted and considered. **Focus on those inventors who don't have a large corporation or prestigious university behind them. **Vet the submissions for both efficacy and social value. **Locate funding sources that will support such work. **Locate local and regional businesses interested in marketing and/or manufacturing new and beneficial designs and products. **Connect resources with inventors and their ideas. **Support projects that utilize such innovations for good. WHAT NOT TO DO: Turn these to large multi-national corporations to exploit for their own gain. ****************************************************************************** **** B. THE UNIQUE KSD BUSINESS MODEL FOR SOLAR GREENHOUSE DEVELOPMENT **Provide a KSD design package kit that will allow farmers & other handy people to build their own greenhouses **Include expert consultation & tech support to assist them throughout the process of building.. **Train able local people as helpers to do the on-site assistance in various parts of the country. **Provide training to locally owned small businesses such as sheet metal shops to manufacture desired parts, such as the solar concentrating collectors. **Work to develop a network of local resources that could market, manufacture & install greenhouses. Some might also produce & sell biofuel from algae. **Include non-profit organizations, as partners that could raise money from selling the kits & subsidize or give units to community gardens, food banks, etc.) **Develop a residential version that could provide gardening & sun space, as well as supplementary heat to an adjacent house. ****************************************************************************** ********* SUBMITTED BY: LIBERTY GOODWIN, CO-OWNER, (WITH PAUL KLINKMAN) KLINKMAN SOLAR DESIGN (KSD), P.O. Box 40572, Providence, RI 02940, Tel. 401-351-9193, E-Mail: info@klinkmansolar.com, Website: www.klinkmansolar.com ******************************************************************************

  5. QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 6 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6 QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 6 From: Hallie Kennan [hallie@energyinnovation.org] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:37 PM To: QERcomments CC: Sonia Aggarwal Subject: Comment on the QER Public Meeting in Atlanta, GA: Business/Economic Development Attachment: APP-UTILITIES.pdf; SPSC-CREPC_NewRegulatoryModels.pdf Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on finance and market incentives. Thank you, Hallie

  6. QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 7 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7 QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 7 From: Hallie Kennan [hallie@energyinnovation.org] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:41 PM To: QERcomments CC: Sonia Aggarwal Subject: RE: Comment on the QER Public Meeting in Atlanta, GA: Business/Economic Development Attachment: APP-UTILITIES.pdf; SPSC-CREPC_NewRegulatoryModels.pdf Apologies. Please accept these papers as comments for the QER public meeting on business/economic development.

  7. HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Equipment | Department of Energy Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) provides these comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment," published at 76 Fed. Reg. 43941 (July 22,

  8. Information Technology Industry Council Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Information Technology Industry Council Comment Information Technology Industry Council Comment The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) appreciates the opportunity to submit comments in response to the Regulatory Burden RFI.1 ITI represents the leading global innovators of information and communications technology (ICT), an industry committed to developing energy-efficient solutions both for our own products and to help enable energy efficiency in other more energy intensive sectors.

  9. City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges | Department of Energy Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri provides comments in response to the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges PDF icon Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges More

  10. Comments on reducing regulatory burden | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    reducing regulatory burden Comments on reducing regulatory burden Comments on reducing regulatory burden from Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces, and accessories PDF icon Comments on reducing regulatory burden More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI [76 FR 75798] Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules 2014-09-18 Issuance: Energy

  11. QER - Comment of National Resource Defense Council | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Chen, Jennifer [jchen@nrdc.org] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 6:14 PM To: QERcomments Subject: QER comments -- electricity transmission, storage, and distribution (eastern focus) Attachments: Sustainable FERC QER comments.pdf Good evening, The Sustainable FERC Project coalition appreciates this opportunity to submit comments on electricity transmission, storage, and distribution. Please find them attached. We look forward to continuing dialogue with DOE and other stakeholders as the QER process

  12. NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) entitled, "Reducing Regulatory Burden," published in the Federal Register on May 15, 2012. PDF icon NAESCO_Cmts_Reducing_Reg_Burden_RFI_Final.pdf More Documents & Publications FPCC Regulatory

  13. Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies As part of its ongoing effort to assist in the formation of policies that will govern the integration of broadband technologies with the Smart Grid, the DOE General Counsel's office issued two Requests for Information (RFIs) in May of 2010. The first RFI was issued to solicit comments from electric utilities, consumer groups, and other stakeholders on ongoing federal, state, and private efforts to protect

  14. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Edison Electric Institute | Department of Energy Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute The Edison Electric Institute ("EEI"), on behalf of its member companies, hereby submits the following comments in response to the request by the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") for information on a wide range of issues dealing with Smart

  15. National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014 | Department of Energy National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014 National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014 On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its current National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The Notice is

  16. QER - Comment of Sempra Energy 3 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Sempra Energy 3 QER - Comment of Sempra Energy 3 From: Gill, Kellen C. [KGill@Sempra.com] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 6:43 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Sempra Energy's Comments regarding the DOE QER - Natural Gas-Electricity Interdependence Attachment: Sempra Energy - Comments on the DOE QER - Natural Gas-Electricity Interdependence.pdf Thursday, September 25, 2014 To: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Submitted via electronic mail:

  17. Microsoft Word - remote handled waste comment extension.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    extends public comment period on the Remote-handled Waste Disposition Project Environmental Assessment Jan. 26, 2009 Media contact: Brad Bugger, (208) 526-0833 In response to a request from the public, the U.S. Department of Energy has extended the deadline to comment on the draft environmental assessment for a proposal to process approximately 327 cubic meters of remote-handled radioactive waste currently stored at Idaho National Laboratory. The public comment period, which originally expired

  18. Town of Danvers Comment on Information Collection Extension | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy Town of Danvers Comment on Information Collection Extension Town of Danvers Comment on Information Collection Extension The Town of Danvers provided comments to the Department of Energy's notice of intent to seek approval of an extension of Information Collection 1910-5149 for Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant reporting for four years, which was published in the Federal Register August 10, 2011, Vol. 76, No. 154, page 49460. Danvers finds the current collection period

  19. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Entergy Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. ("Entergy"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, regarding the current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities. Entergy commented on similar issues in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission

  20. Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 | Department of Energy Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Notice is hereby given that two documents are publicly available and the Department of Energy is requesting public comments. The

  1. Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation | Department of Energy Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation submits the following comments to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in hopes that their contribution can highlight and further the understanding of the DOE on

  2. Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Damage Contingent Cost Allocation | Department of Energy Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation; Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 PDF icon Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on

  3. QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 1 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    1 QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 1 From: Hallie Kennan [hallie@energyinnovation.org] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:19 PM To: QERcomments CC: Sonia Aggarwal Subject: Comment on the QER Public Meeting: Electricity Transmission, Storage and Distribution Attachment: APP-DER-PAPER.pdf; APP-DG-PAPER.pdf; APP-TRANSMISSION-PAPER.pdf Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the July 11th public meeting on electricity transmission, storage, and distribution. Thank you,

  4. QER - Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Association QER - Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association From: Gutierrez, Paul [Paul.Gutierrez@nreca.coop] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 4:20 PM To: QERcomments CC: Silberstein, Pam M.; Steve Sharp Subject: Comment on the Public Meeting in Chicago, IL: Rail, Barge, Truck Transportation Attachment: CURE Power Point filed with DOE QER August 2014.pdf Please find attached comments regarding the agenda item, "RAIL - HOW A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF OUR

  5. From: Tunnell, Andrew To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    RE: Southern Companies" Comments to Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:28:05 PM Attachments: DOE Congestion Comments.pdf I'm resending the comments described below as I did not receive any confirmation email. Please contact me at the number provided below if there is anything else that needs to be done in this regard. Thanks Andrew Tunnell From: Tunnell, Andrew Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 2:17 PM To:

  6. DOE Seeks Comment on Regional Standards Enforcement Plan | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Seeks Comment on Regional Standards Enforcement Plan DOE Seeks Comment on Regional Standards Enforcement Plan November 12, 2015 - 4:50pm Addthis DOE has proposed regulations setting forth how the Department would enforce the regional standards for central air conditioners and is seeking comment from the public about the enforcement plan. The proposed rule was developed by a working group of efficiency advocates, manufacturers, utility representatives, contractors, and distributors.

  7. Public Meetings and Comment Deadlines | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Appliance & Equipment Standards » Rulemakings & Notices » Public Meetings and Comment Deadlines Public Meetings and Comment Deadlines The Department of Energy (DOE) provides the public with an opportunity to participate in meetings to discuss proposed changes to rulemakings and product standards. The table below lists all upcoming public meeting and comment close dates, and provides links to the relevant Federal Register notices. If there are no entries, no public meetings are

  8. City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    2011 | Department of Energy City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 The City of Fort Collins provided comments to the Department of Energy's notice of intent to seek approval of an extension of Information Collection 1910-5149 for Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant reporting for four years, which was published in the Federal Register August 10, 2011, Vol. 76, No. 154,

  9. Comments of the American Public Power Association | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Public Power Association Comments of the American Public Power Association In response to the U.S. Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") published May 11, 2010 in the Federal Register,1 the American Public Power Association ("APPA") hereby submits its comments in response to questions on data access, third party use, and privacy as related to the implementation of smart grid technology. PDF icon Comments of the American Public Power

  10. DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    on Radioactive Waste DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste PDF icon 1. Summary Comments on Draft Branch Technical Position on a Performance Assessment Methodology for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities PDF icon 2. Department of Energy (DOE) Consolidated Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 30 November 1994 Preproposal Draft of 40 CFR Part 193, Environmental Standards for the Management, Storage and Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) More Documents &

  11. Microsoft Word - Public Comments EPAct 1817 061507.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments Following are all comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy on the February 2007 draft of the Study, "The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issued That May Impede Their Expansion." All comments are provided in their original, unedited format. Table of Contents 1. IDAHO ENERGY DIVISION ..............................................................................1 2. MARK B. LIVELY, LIVELY UTILITY (CONSULTING)

  12. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    and Power- Minnesota | Department of Energy Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota

  13. AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges | Department of Energy AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in response to the

  14. Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Services » Technology Development » Smart Grid » Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments As part of its ongoing effort regarding the formation of smart grid policy, the Department of Energy issued a Request for Information in September of 2010 on the topic of "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." The purpose was to solicit comments from interested stakeholders on

  15. FOIA Comments January 23, 2009 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments January 23, 2009 FOIA Comments January 23, 2009 Comments on proposed amendments to 10CFR 1004 (FOIA REGS) RIN 1901-AA32 as of January 23,2009 PDF icon DUPLICATION FEES More Documents & Publications FIA-14-0036 - In the Matter of Tim Hadley FIA-14-0039 - In the Matter of Tim Hadley FIA-14-0040 - In the Matter of Tim Hadley

  16. SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments Provided to the US Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Request for Information Relating to the Permitting of Transmission Lines Submitted as of March 28, 2012 2 1.0 Background. SunZia Southwest Transmission Project (SunZia or the Project) is a joint development effort currently underway in Arizona and New Mexico. The Project definition includes licensing, permitting, financing, constructing and operating up to

  17. QER- Comment of Jennifer Markens 9

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To the QER committee; Over the last six months, as an average citizen, I have learned a great deal about current energy policy. We have no real news any longer, so it takes much work to find out about things that affect our lives as citizens. This opportunity for comment, for example, is really not in any sense "an opportunity for public commentary" since the U.S. public is largely uninformed in any real sense.

  18. Summary of Questions, Answers and Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Meeting: Data/Communication Standards and Interoperability of Building Appliances, Equipment, and Systems Summary of Questions, Answers and Comments in the Discussion Periods Following Presentations Presentation: Introductions and purpose (Joe Hagerman) Question (Q): What is the difference between the April 30 public meeting and this non-public meeting? What is the end goal / end game / timeline? Answer (A): DOE is hosting a series of meetings to ensure we've done our due diligence before we

  19. Comments of Motorola, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Motorola, Inc. Comments of Motorola, Inc. Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola") hereby responds to the National Broadband Plan Request for Information (" NBP RFI") on the communications requirements of utilities, including but not limited to requirements for Smart Grid.1 Motorola supports the efforts of the Department of Energy ("DOE") to fully assess utilities' requirements before the communications solutions for Smart Grid and other requirements are addressed. Based on

  20. Microsoft Word - OKalossa Comments.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 8H033 Washington, D.C. 20585 RE: Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (September 17, 2010). Ladies and Gentlemen: Okaloosa Gas District (The District) an Independent Special District of the State of Florida is appreciative of the opportunity to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to

  1. Microsoft Word - supplemental comment letter.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    March 23, 2006 Lawrence Mansueti Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division Office of Electricity and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0119 Re: Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Dear Mr. Mansueti: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the

  2. Electronic Comment Form | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Electronic Comment Form | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at

  3. Microsoft Word - Summary of Presentations and Comments for NYC QER Public Meeting_draft 11 2 Welsh edits

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    3: New York, NY Energy Infrastructure Finance October 6, 2014 Opening Remarks Dr. Karen Wayland - U.S. Department of Energy The Presidential Memorandum which announced the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER) tasked the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to conduct stakeholder outreach efforts. This is the thirteenth public meeting of the QER. The final date for comment submissions is October 10, 2014, so this is the final public meeting of the first year of the QER. The Honorable Carolyn Maloney,

  4. Microsoft Word - Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments regarding small motor regulations 17July2015 v5_1.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    November 28, 2 July 17, 2015 VIA EMAIL TO: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Mr. Aaron Stevenson U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Assistant General Counsel Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency 1000 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20585 Reducing Regulatory Burden: Request for Information (RFI) Dear Mr. Stevenson, The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached comments on the Request for Information to Reduce Regulatory

  5. Geothermal Technologies Office 2012 Peer Review Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2013-04-01

    On May 7-10, 2012, the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Geothermal Technologies Office conducted its annual program peer review in Westminster, CO. In accordance with the EERE Peer Review Guide, the review provides an independent, expert evaluation of the strategic goals and direction of the office and is a forum for feedback and recommendations on future office planning. The purpose of the review was to evaluate DOE-funded projects for their contribution to the mission and goals of the office and to assess progress made against stated objectives. Project scoring results, expert reviewer comments, and key findings and recommendations are included in this report.

  6. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant ETE Analysis Review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Diediker, Nona H.; Jones, Joe A.

    2006-12-09

    Under contract with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), staff from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Sandia National Laboratory (SNL)-Albuquerque reviewed the evacuation time estimate (ETE) analysis dated April 2006 prepared by IEM for the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP). The ETE analysis was reviewed for consistency with federal regulations using the NRC guidelines in Review Standard (RS)-002, Supplement 2 and Appendix 4 to NUREG-0654, and NUREG/CR-4831. Additional sources of information referenced in the analysis and used in the review included NUREG/CR-6863 and NUREG/CR-6864. The PNNL report includes general comments, data needs or clarifications, and requests for additional information (RAI) resulting from review of the ETE analysis.

  7. Environmental Assessment for Conducting Astrophysics and Other Basic Science Experiments - Appendix A Comments and Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    A-1 APPENDIX A COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This appendix contains the comments that were received during the 30-day public comment period on the draft EA (October 23 through November 22, 2000) and their responses. Comments were obtained during public meetings held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on November 14, 2000, and in Carlsbad, New Mexico, on November 16, 2000, as well as from letters and electronic mail messages. The comment entries are organized according to comment categories. In compliance with

  8. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    | Department of Energy from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Dr. Contreras 6-10-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras

  9. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Callahan

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    | Department of Energy Ms. Callahan Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Callahan Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Ms. Callahan 07-13-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Cynthia Blansett (COE) Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Simon Mahan (SWEA)

  10. Biomass Program 2007 Program Peer Review - Biodiesel and Other Technologies Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2009-10-28

    This document discloses the comments provided by a review panel at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program Peer Review held on November 15-16, 2007 in Baltimore, MD and the Biodiesel and Other Technologies, held on August 14th and 15th in Golden, Colorado.

  11. 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2014-10-01

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on June 16-20, 2014, in Washington, DC. It covers the program areas of hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; manufacturing R&D; technology validation; safety, codes, and standards; market transformation; and systems analysis.

  12. 2015 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2015-10-01

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2015 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on June 8-12, 2015, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program areas of hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; manufacturing R&D; technology validation; safety, codes, and standards; market transformation; and systems analysis.

  13. DOE Hydrogen Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    2010-12-01

    This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2010 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held June 7-11, 2010 in Washington, D.C.

  14. 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2013-10-01

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 13-17, 2013, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program areas of hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; manufacturing R&D; technology validation; safety, codes, and standards; market transformation; and systems analysis.

  15. 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2011-09-01

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 9-13, 2011, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program areas of hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; manufacturing R&D; technology validation; safety, codes, and standards; education; market transformation; and systems analysis.

  16. 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Satyapal, S.

    2009-10-01

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18-22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program areas of hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; education; safety, codes, and standards; technology validation; systems analysis; and manufacturing R&D.

  17. 2008 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2008-06-13

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2008 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on June 9-13, 2008, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program areas of hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes, and standards; education; systems analysis; and manufacturing.

  18. 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2012-09-01

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2012, in Arlington, Virginia. It covers the program areas of hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; manufacturing R&D; technology validation; safety, codes, and standards; education; market transformation; and systems analysis.

  19. 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2010-12-01

    This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on June 7-11, 2010, in Washington, DC. It covers the program areas of hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; manufacturing R&D; technology validation; safety, codes, and standards; education; and systems analysis.

  20. Hydrogen Technology Validation: DOE Hydrogen Program 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 9–13, 2011 in Arlington, VA.

  1. QER- Comment of New England State Committee on Electricity

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are comments of the New England States Committee on Electricity (NESCOE) on the QER meeting held in New England on April 21, 2014.

  2. EIS-0433: DOE Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    XL Project. Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Keystone XL Pipeline Project, DOEEIS-433 (July 2010) More Documents & Publications EIS-0433: Final...

  3. HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) provides these comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled "Energy Conservation ...

  4. Comments of NRDC on Department of Energy Interim Final Rule:...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    NRDC's comments on Interim Final Rule: Energy Conservation for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings and New Federal Low-Rise Residential ...

  5. AHAM Comments_DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden July 2015_FINAL...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    standards, but in many cases, DOE has failed to ... Minimally acceptable engineering analysis and sound policy conclusions ... opportunity for the public to comment on the ...

  6. Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden On behalf of the...

  7. Supplemental Comments of David K. Paylor, Director of the Commonwealth...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    David K. Paylor, Director of the Commonwealth of Virginia's Department of Environmental Quality Supplemental Comments of David K. Paylor, Director of the Commonwealth of Virginia's ...

  8. City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    The City of Alexandria, Virginia ("Alexandria") hereby submits the following comments in response to the notice of emergency action published in the Federal Register on January...

  9. Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation -75 FR 43945 PDF icon Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for...

  10. Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for Application...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension of Public Comment Period for Application for Proposed Project for Clean Line Plains & Eastern Transmission Line: Federal Register Notice, Volume 80, No. 116 - Jun. 17, ...

  11. Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Compensation Contingent Cost Allocation Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent Cost Allocation DOE published a Notice of Inquiry in the Federal...

  12. Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost...

  13. Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality...

  14. FEMP Seeking Public Comment on Draft M&V Guidelines

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    FEMP is continuing its request for public comments on the Draft M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Performance-Based Contracts (Version 4.0).

  15. QER- Comment of American Wind Energy Association 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    QER Task Force Attached please find brief supplemental comments that AWEA would like to submit for your consideration as you continuing drafting the QER.

  16. Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National ... Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Information-Implementing ...

  17. BPA's proposed oversupply management protocol for comment, Feb...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    charge. BPA is seeking comments on the proposal, which is described in two documents: a) new tariff language for addressing oversupply (Attachment P); and b) a more detailed...

  18. Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Public Comments to Community Relations Plan

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Last saved on: 7/22/2011 Final CRP comment for June 2011 1 SECTION TEXT COMMENT POST? GENERAL COMMENTS N/A We urge the DOE, NNSA and LANL to establish a community calendar so that the various LANL organizations who are scheduling public meetings are aware of other community events, such as the public comment periods on various documents, including PMRs, semi-annual meetings (e.g., CMRR and storm water permit meetings), Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board meetings, RACER, New Mexico

  19. Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access...

  20. Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of ... Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Tendril is ...

  1. Exhibits to Sierra Club's Motion to Intervene, Protest, and Comments |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Exhibits to Sierra Club's Motion to Intervene, Protest, and Comments Exhibits to Sierra Club's Motion to Intervene, Protest, and Comments PDF icon Ex._01_-_Declaration PDF icon Ex._02_-_LNG_rulemaking_petition PDF icon Ex._03_-_EIA_analysis PDF icon Ex._04_-_Brooks_Model_LNG_Exports_from_the_US PDF icon Ex._05_-_Deloitte_Analysis_for_Excelerate PDF icon Ex._06_-_EPA_Region_10_Scoping_Comments PDF icon Ex._07_-_EPA_Region_3_Scoping_Comments PDF icon

  2. Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    section 216(h): Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing section 216(h): Coordination ...

  3. QER- Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 4

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NRECA is submitting additional comments to supplement the one previously filed on October 3rd. Please let me know if you have any questions.

  4. Comments of the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American Lung Association in response to the ... Comments of the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American Lung Association in ...

  5. AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law ...

  6. EIS-0403: Notice to Extend Public Comment Period | Department...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    States The Department of Energy and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (the Agencies) extended the public comment period for the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement to...

  7. EIS-0431: Extension of public comment period; Notice of public...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    EIS-0431: Extension of public comment period; Notice of public hearing (Correction) Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and Carbon Capture and...

  8. Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of Federal Authorizations for Electric Transmission Facilities Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Coordination of...

  9. 2006 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Federal Register Notice & Comments

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Federal Register Notice of Inquiry requesting comments and providing notice of a technical conference for the 2006 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study was issued February 2, 2006.

  10. Comments from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electric Frontier Foundation: Implementing the Fips in the Smart Grid Comments from The Center for Democracy and Technology and ...

  11. Comments on a National Power Transformer Reserve Program Introduction

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FINAL: August 24, 2015 1 Comments on a National Power ... ("DOE") Request for Information on a National Power ... Our members provide electricity for 220 million Americans, ...

  12. COMMENTS OF THE CANADIAN ELECTRICITY ASSOCIATION U.S. DEPARTMENT...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    COMMENTS OF THE CANADIAN ELECTRICITY ASSOCIATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REQUEST FOR INFORMATION - NATIONAL POWER TRANSFORMER RESERVE August 24, 2015 I. Introduction The Canadian ...

  13. AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law...

  14. Support for City of Alexandria's Comments on the District of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Commission Re: District of Columbia Public Service Commission Emergency ... Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Comments on Department of Energy's ...

  15. Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PDF icon Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public ... Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station and Proposed Mirant Compliance Plan ...

  16. Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Supplemental Comments on the Department ... Emergency Order 202-05-3. District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. ...

  17. Microsoft Word - 2012 RCRA CRP comment table.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Public Comments to Community Relations Plan Annual Summary of Comments for July 2011 through August 2012 Last saved on: 8/24/2012 Annual Summary of CRP comment for July 2011- August 2012 1 SECTION TEXT COMMENT POST? 2.0 PURPOSE OF THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN Section 1.12 of the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit requires that LANL establish and implement a Community Relations Plan (CRP). The purpose of the CRP is to keep surrounding communities and interested

  18. Comments of Tendril Networks Inc | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Tendril offers a software and hardware solution that enables residential home energy management and demand response. Therefore, our comments will primarily address issues that ...

  19. Department of Energy Announces Plans for Additional Comment Period...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    prior to DOE issuing any National Corridor designations. Media contact(s): Craig Stevens, (202) 586-4940 Addthis Related Articles DOE Announces Additional Public Comment...

  20. Comments of the American Public Gas Association on the Smart...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments from The American Public Gas Association on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing policy and logisitcal challenges to smart grid implementation PDF icon The American Public Gas ...