National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for rev 10-83 prescribed

  1. RevCom

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    RevCom is the online review, comment, and approval system for draft DOE directives. For access to RevCom, contact your local Directives Point of Contact (DPC) or contact Technical Support.

  2. Microsoft Word - Rev5functionalaccountabilityimplementationplan...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Microsoft Word - Rev5functionalaccountabilityimplementationplan..doc Microsoft Word - Rev5functionalaccountabilityimplementationplan..doc PDF icon Microsoft Word -...

  3. RevCom Home

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    web application requires JavaScript enabled in your browser. This script writes out the header html RevCom: Choose your role to login Subject Matter Experts Review and comment on...

  4. ORO-845 REV.

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ORO-845 REV. 1 SUPPLEMENT Surplus Facilities Management Program (SFMP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 NIAGARA FALLS STORAGE SITE PROJECT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SUPPLEMENT Prepared by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE .....- - - - - - - - - - LEGAL NonCE - - - - - - - - - - - - . This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of

  5. CH-TRAMPAC Rev. 4

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    This page intentionally left blank to facilitate duplex printing. CH-TRAMPAC Document Rev. 4, December 2012 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1.1-1 1.1 Scope ...................................................................................................................... 1.1-1 1.2 Purpose

  6. Microsoft Word - Rev5functionalaccountabilityimplementationplan..doc |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Rev5functionalaccountabilityimplementationplan..doc Microsoft Word - Rev5functionalaccountabilityimplementationplan..doc PDF icon Microsoft Word - Rev5functionalaccountabilityimplementationplan..doc More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - AL2007-01.doc module 4 Chapter 71 - Review and Approval of Contract and Financial Assistance Actions

  7. DOE/EA-1261 Rev.

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    1 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Riverton, Wyoming, Uranium Mill Tailings Site Final September 1998 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13 -96GJ87335 for the U.S. Department of Energy This page intentionally left blank DOE Grand Junction Office Page iii EA of Ground Water Compliance at Riverton Final September 1998 Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . .

  8. Microsoft Word - aser_rev0.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Weiss Associates Environmental Science, Engineering and Management ANNUAL SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 2007 for the LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Submitted to: S.M. Stoller Corporation 2597 B ¾ Road Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 Prepared by: Weiss Associates 5801 Christie Avenue, Suite 600 Emeryville, California 94608-1827 September 30, 2008 Rev. 0 J:\DOE_STOLLER\4110\137\ASER 2007\REV. 0\ASER_REV0.DOC WEISS ASSOCIATES Project Number:

  9. Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. Commemorative Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    All employees are invited to the Department’s 2014 Commemorative Program honoring the late Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. on January 22, 2014 at 11 am.

  10. CH-TRUCON Rev. 21, January 2008

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOE/WIPP 01-3194 Rev. 21 CH-TRU WASTE CONTENT CODES (CH-TRUCON) Revision 21 January 2008 This document supercedes DOE/WIPP 01-3194, Revision 20 CH-TRUCON, Rev. 21, January 2008 DOE/WIPP 01-3194 2 DOE/WIPP 01-3194 Rev. 21 CH-TRU WASTE CONTENT CODES (CH-TRUCON) Revision 21 January 2008 Approved by: [Signature on File] Date:____________ D. Casey Gadbury, National TRU Program Director CH-TRUCON, Rev. 21, January 2008 DOE/WIPP 01-3194 3 This document has been submitted as required to: Office of

  11. Form W-8BEN (Rev. February 2006)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Form W-8BEN (Rev. February 2006) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Certificate of Foreign Status of Beneficial Owner for United States Tax Withholding See...

  12. Microsoft Word - NESHAPs_rev0

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    RADIONUCLIDE AIR EMISSION ANNUAL REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 2008 for the LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS prepared for: SM Stoller Corporation 2597 B ¾ Road Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 prepared by: Weiss Associates 5801 Christie Avenue, Suite 600 Emeryville, California 94608-1827 June 23, 2009 Rev. 0 J:\DOE_Stoller\4110\138\2008_NESHAPs\Rev0\NESHAPs_rev0.doc WEISS ASSOCIATES Project Number: 130-4114 RADIONUCLIDE AIR EMISSION ANNUAL REPORT CALENDAR YEAR

  13. Microsoft Word - S03273_Rev1.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Surface, Hot Creek Valley, Nevada, for Calendar Year 2007 September 2008 Rev. 1 DOE-LM/1558-2007 This page intentionally left blank DOE-LM/1558-2008 Post-Closure Inspection and Monitoring Report for Corrective Action Unit 417: Central Nevada Test Area Surface, Hot Creek Valley, Nevada for Calendar Year 2007 September 2008 Rev. 1 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy CY 2007 Post-Closure Inspection & Monitoring Report for CAU 417 September 2008, Rev. 1 Doc. No. S0327300

  14. Microsoft Word - 2008_aser_rev0

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ANNUAL SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 2008 for the LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Submitted to: S.M. Stoller Corporation 2597 B ¾ Road Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 Prepared by: Weiss Associates 5801 Christie Avenue, Suite 600 Emeryville, California 94608-1827 September 2009 Rev. 0 J:\DOE_STOLLER\4110\137\ASER 2008\REV0\2008_ASER_REV0.DOC WEISS ASSOCIATES Project Number: 130-4111 ANNUAL SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 2008 for

  15. ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) Inspection Checklists...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) Inspection Checklists for National Program Requirements ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) Inspection Checklists for ...

  16. ENERGY STAR CERTIFIED HOMES, VERSION 3 (REV. 08) NATIONAL PROGRAM...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CERTIFIED HOMES, VERSION 3 (REV. 08) NATIONAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS ENERGY STAR CERTIFIED HOMES, VERSION 3 (REV. 08) NATIONAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Revision 08 is the most ...

  17. ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) National Program...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    National Program Requirements ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) National Program Requirements ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) National Program ...

  18. 8/25/2015 RevCom

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    52015 RevCom https:www.directives.doe.govcgi-binm3.exe 147 User: DoxAdmin - DOE-Directives Administrator - Comments Report Document type: DOE-Directives Document: DOE O...

  19. CHPRC1104-16_Rev06A

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Deep Vadose Zone Deep Vadose Zone Deep Vadose Zone Addressing contamination deep in the vadose zone Enter Please use your mouse to navigate CHPRC1104-16Rev055-18-11 Contents ...

  20. Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ) Process Rev

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ) Process Rev . 0 USQ Determination Worksheet ~ "'-'-, Los Alamos * ... .. t~ .:. ! , :; - .. .. . 1 UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DETERMINATION WORKSHEET Facility Identification: TA-50-69, WCRRF Facility-Specific usa Number: WCRRF-12-625-D Rev: 0 Change Number: EP-WCRR-WO-DOP-0233, R. 36 Date: 7/30/12 Title: Processing Waste in the Waste Characterization Glovebox Summary - Based on the evaluation presented in this worksheet, the: D Situation involves a PISA. ~

  1. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 04) |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy National Program Requirements (Rev. 04) DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 04) U.S. Department of Energy Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 04) PDF icon DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements Rev04.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 05) California DOE ZERH Program Requiremets DOE Challenge Home, California Program Requirements

  2. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 05) |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy National Program Requirements (Rev. 05) DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 05) U.S. Department of Energy Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 05), May, 11, 2015. PDF icon DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements Rev05 - Final.pdf More Documents & Publications California DOE ZERH Program Requiremets DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 04) DOE Challenge Home, California Program

  3. DOE-0361, Rev. 0 (FINAL).pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 of 1 Hanford Site-Wide Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) Procedure DOE-0361 Revision 0 Published: March 28, 2011 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited By J. D. Aardal at 2:31 pm, Mar 30, 2011 Hanford Site-Wide Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) Procedure DOE-0361, Rev. 0 Published: March 28, 2011 Page 1 of 59 Hanford Site-Wide Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) Procedure DOE-0361, Rev. 0 Published:

  4. Microsoft Word - 12-IS.03 Rev. 7

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    02/18/14 WP 12-IS.03 Revision 7 Electrical Safety Program Manual Cognizant Department: Environmental, Safety and Health Approved By: Tim Rotert Working Copy Electrical Safety Program Manual WP 12-IS.03, Rev. 7 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE HISTORY SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 5 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................. 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

  5. Microsoft Word - 15-GM.03 Rev 7

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    10/04/13 WP 15-GM.03 Revision 7 Integrated Safety Management System Description Tim Rotert / 10/03/13 Manager, Environmental, Safety and Health Date Working Copy Integrated Safety Management System Description WP15-GM.03, Rev. 7 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE HISTORY SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  6. Microsoft Word - 15-HS.02 Rev 8

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    10/14/13 WP 15-HS.02 Revision 8 Occupational Health Program Cognizant Department: Safety and Health Approved by: Tom Ferguson Working Copy WIPP Occupational Health Program WP 15-HS.02, Rev. 8 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE HISTORY SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 4 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................. 5 PREFACE

  7. DOE/NV--209-REV15

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    DOE/NV--209-REV 15 United States Nuclear Tests July 1945 through September 1992 Date Published - December 2000 Prepared by the United States Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada This page intentionally left blank. iii Table of Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii Caveat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

  8. Haw. Rev. Stat. 269-1 | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Haw. Rev. Stat. 269-1Legal Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 2014 Legal Citation Haw. Rev. State. 269-1 DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:...

  9. ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) National Program

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Requirements | Department of Energy National Program Requirements ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) National Program Requirements ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) National Program Requirements PDF icon energy_star_v3_nat_program_rqmnts_reV07.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 05) DOE Zero Energy Ready Home National Program Requirements (Rev. 04) California DOE ZERH Program Requiremets

  10. Microsoft Word - TSLCC 2007_5_05_08 rev 1.doc | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    TSLCC 200750508 rev 1.doc Microsoft Word - TSLCC 200750508 rev 1.doc Microsoft Word - TSLCC 200750508 rev 1.doc More Documents & Publications FY 2007 Total System Life...

  11. 3REV2004DOEFAIR.xls | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    REV2004DOEFAIR.xls� 3REV2004DOEFAIR.xls� PDF icon 3REV2004DOEFAIR.xls� More Documents & Publications N:\My Documents\porfin.pdf� 2003 DOE IGCA Inventory Data for web.xls� 2002 DOE Final Inherently Governmental and Commercial Activities Inventory

  12. Microsoft Word - 12-3489, Rev. 0

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    12-3489 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2011 U.S. Department of Energy September 2012 Rev. 0 1 2 This page intentionally left blank Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2011 DOE/WIPP-12-3489 3 2011 Annual Site Environmental Report To our readers: This Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Annual Site Environmental Report for 2011 presents summary environmental data to (1) characterize site environmental management performance, (2)

  13. Microsoft Word - frm-1901rev1.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Form FRM-1901 ASBESTIFORM SHIPMENT NOTIFICATION Fax to (702) 295-1153 02/14/08 Rev. 01 Page 1 of 1 The generator signed below shall submit this notification to NNSA/NSO at least seven days in advance of arrival of shipment of Asbestiform low-level waste to the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site (RWMS). Generator: Generator Address: Generator Telephone Number: Fax Number: Transporter Name: Transporter Address: Transporter Telephone Number: Fax Number: Waste Stream Identification Number:

  14. Microsoft Word - 0905_rev0.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Environmental Programs, Oakland, California Weiss Associates Environmental Science, Engineering and Management ANNUAL SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 2004 for the LABORATORY FOR ENERGY-RELATED HEALTH RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Submitted to: United States Department of Energy Oakland Environmental Programs 1301 Clay Street Oakland, California 94612-5208 Prepared by: Weiss Associates 5801 Christie Avenue, Suite 600 Emeryville, California 94608-1827 September 22, 2005 Rev. 0

  15. Microsoft Word - ADM 14 Rev 2

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    4 ADM 14 REV 2 December 2010 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 14: INFORMATIONAL SERVICES RECORDS December 2010 Revision 2 This schedule covers certain records pertaining to informational services performed by the Department in their day-to-day affairs and in their relations with the public, including records created in administering Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act ) programs. Except as otherwise specified in individual items, it applies to copies of these records wherever

  16. Microsoft Word - HABAdv #233_System Plan Rev4_Planning Rev5.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3 Subject: Tank Waste System Plan Rev 4 & Planning for Rev 5 Adopted: June 4, 2010 Page 1 June 4, 2010 Shirley Olinger, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection P.O. Box 450 (H6-60) Richland, WA 99352 Jane Hedges, Program Manager Washington State Department of Ecology 3100 Port of Benton Blvd. Richland, WA 99354 Re: Tank Waste System Plan Revision 4 and Planning Assumptions for Revision 5 Dear Ms. Olinger and Ms. Hedges, Background Safe tank waste retrieval, treatment

  17. Microsoft Word - AR VR rev.1.wpd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    EA15PC3041-1-0 August 18, 2003 Rev. 1 Page 1 of 1 Working Copy AR/VR Transmittal Register 1. Page 1 of 2. PR/PO Number: 3. Supplier: 4. Buyer: 5. STR or Cognizant Engineer: 6. Project, System, or Equipment Description: 7. AR/VR No. 8. SOW or Spec. No. 9. Description of Submittal or Special Conditions 10. For Approval/ Record 11. Date Due to WTS or Prior to 12. Date Rec. 13. Date to STR 14. Date from STR 15. Disposition A, C, D 16. Resubmittal Required? 17. Date to Supplier 1. Facility Compliance

  18. Form W-8BEN (Rev. February 2006)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Form W-8BEN (Rev. February 2006) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Certificate of Foreign Status of Beneficial Owner for United States Tax Withholding ᮣ See separate instructions. ᮣ Give this form to the withholding agent or payer. Do not send to the IRS. OMB No. 1545-1621 Do not use this form for: Instead, use Form: ● A foreign partnership, a foreign simple trust, or a foreign grantor trust (see instructions for exceptions) W-8ECI or W-8IMY ● A foreign government,

  19. Microsoft Word - nfo-205rev0

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NFO-205 Rev. 0 (08/2015) Older Versions Obsolete INFORMATION REQUIRED FROM UNCLEARED U.S. CITIZENS FOR TOURS OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA FIELD OFFICE (NNSA/NFO)FACILITIES US/DOE NNSA/NFO Name of Group Date of Visit Name of Contact Person Contact's Telephone (Include Area Code) LAST Name First Middle Initial (MI) (If no MI, write NMI) Date of Birth Place of Birth (City and State) Citizenship E-Mail Address: Badge #: Level of Clearance: Purpose of Visit: Company Name: Job

  20. Microsoft Word - ICMP2005Rev2.doc

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    49-REV2 INTEGRATED CLOSURE AND MONITORING PLAN for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office under Contract Number DE-AC08-96NV11718 June 2005 DISCLAIMER NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their

  1. Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications Version 1 (Rev. 02...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    airPLUS Construction Specifications Version 1 (Rev. 02), November 2013, from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. PDF icon chiap.pdf More Documents & Publications Indoor...

  2. CRAD, Conduct of Engineering - May 4, 2015 (EA CRAD 31-13, Rev...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Conduct of Engineering - May 4, 2015 (EA CRAD 31-13, Rev. 0 CRAD, Conduct of Engineering - May 4, 2015 (EA CRAD 31-13, Rev. 0 May 2015 Conduct of Engineering (EA CRAD 31-13, Rev....

  3. Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1330_Rimando 110316 rev3 [Compatibility...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    330Rimando 110316 rev3 Compatibility Mode Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1330Rimando 110316 rev3 Compatibility Mode PDF icon Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1330Rimando 110316 rev3...

  4. DOE/RL-2002-63, Rev. 0

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Energy P.O. Box 550, Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/RL-2002-63 Rev. 0 Engineering Evaluation/ Cost Analysis (EE/CA) for Disposition of Mixed Waste from the 183-H Solar Evaporation Basins United States Department of Energy P.O. Box 550, Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/RL-2002-63 Rev. 0 Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) for Disposition of Mixed Waste from the 183-H Solar Evaporation Basins March 2003 DOE/RL-2002-63 Rev. 0 EE/CA for Disposition of Mixed Waste From the 183-H Solar

  5. CRAD, Explosives Safety- February 19, 2015 (EA CRAD 32-01, Rev. 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CRAD, Explosives Safety – February 19, 2015 (EA CRAD 32-01, Rev. 0) Explosives Safety Criteria Review and Approach Document (EA CRAD 32-01, Rev. 0)

  6. Property:Tot rev (thousand $) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    "Tot rev (thousand )" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 6,790 +...

  7. Property:Ind rev (thousand $) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    "Ind rev (thousand )" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 1,350 +...

  8. Property:Res rev (thousand $) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    "Res rev (thousand )" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 3,675 +...

  9. Property:Com rev (thousand $) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    "Com rev (thousand )" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 1,765 +...

  10. Microsoft Word - Deposition Request Form Rev10-12.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Deposition Request Form rev10/12-sm Personal Contact Information Date: ____/____/______ Name:_________________________________ Phone #__________________ E-Mail_____________________________ Project Reference Number: _________________________ Dept _________________ Professor _____________________________ Professor Email ________________________________ Substrate Description ( substrate provided by user) Total Number of Substrates: ________ Deposition Specifications Film

  11. Microsoft Word - MP 5 2 Final Rev 3

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Form 4.1-1 U. S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE CBFO MP 5.2, Rev. 3 Effective: 15 November 2010 SUBJECT: TRU WASTE SITE CERTIFICATION...

  12. Microsoft Word - SRR-CWDA-2011-00119_Rev 0

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Site Rev.: Revision 0 Doc. Date: 9302010 Commenter(s): Ben C. Rusche Contact: Sherri Ross No. Comments Comment Resolution Page 2 of 8 1 The document is an excellent history of...

  13. Biodiesel Revs Up Its Applications | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Biodiesel Revs Up Its Applications Biodiesel Revs Up Its Applications March 3, 2011 - 3:41pm Addthis A presentation at the 2011 National Biodiesel Board's Conference and Expo A presentation at the 2011 National Biodiesel Board's Conference and Expo Shannon Brescher Shea Communications Manager, Clean Cities Program Transforming America's transportation system to reduce our reliance on imported oil will strengthen our economy, our security and our environment. A number of solutions exist to help

  14. New DOE-NASCAR Partnership Revs Deployment of Pollution Reducing

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Technologies | Department of Energy DOE-NASCAR Partnership Revs Deployment of Pollution Reducing Technologies New DOE-NASCAR Partnership Revs Deployment of Pollution Reducing Technologies September 11, 2013 - 4:44pm Addthis Dr. Michael Knotek, Deputy Undersecretary for Science and Energy at the Energy Department, delivers remarks at the NASCAR Green Summit in Chicago, where the DOE-NASCAR MOU was announced. | Photo courtesy of NASCAR. Dr. Michael Knotek, Deputy Undersecretary for Science and

  15. Abengoa-Tilley RevD | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Abengoa-Tilley RevD Abengoa-Tilley RevD This presentation was delivered at the SunShot Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) Program Review 2013, held April 23-25, 2013 near Phoenix, Arizona. PDF icon csp_review_meeting_042413_tilley.pdf More Documents & Publications Phase Change Material Tower CX-010503: Categorical Exclusion Determination 2014 SunShot Initiative Portfolio Book: Concentrating Solar Power

  16. Enhancements to Generic Disposal System Modeling Capabilities Rev2 |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Enhancements to Generic Disposal System Modeling Capabilities Rev2 Enhancements to Generic Disposal System Modeling Capabilities Rev2 Contributions are described for the development of an enhanced generic disposal system modeling and analysis capability that takes advantage of high-performance computing (HPC) environments to simulate the important multi-physics phenomena and couplings associated with a geologic repository for UNF and HLW. The enhanced disposal system

  17. Microsoft Word - TSLCC 2007_5_05_08 rev 1.doc | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    TSLCC 2007_5_05_08 rev 1.doc Microsoft Word - TSLCC 2007_5_05_08 rev 1.doc PDF icon Microsoft Word - TSLCC 2007_5_05_08 rev 1.doc More Documents & Publications FY 2007 Total System Life Cycle Cost, Pub 2008 Microsoft Word - TSLCC 2007_5_05_08 rev 1.doc FY 2007 Fee Adequacy, Pub 2008

  18. Alternative Fuels Data Center: New Hampshire Fleet Revs up With Natural Gas

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

    New Hampshire Fleet Revs up With Natural Gas to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: New Hampshire Fleet Revs up With Natural Gas on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: New Hampshire Fleet Revs up With Natural Gas on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: New Hampshire Fleet Revs up With Natural Gas on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: New Hampshire Fleet Revs up With Natural Gas on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: New

  19. Microsoft Word - TSR rev 4, implemented Nov 19, 2013

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7-3373 Rev. 4 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Technical Safety Requirements Prepared by Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC Carlsbad, NM U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-EM0001971 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Carlsbad, NM NOVEMBER 2013 DOE/WIPP 07-3373 Rev. 4 Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC contributed to the preparation of this document and should not be considered an eligible contractor for its review. This document revision was prepared by Nuclear Waste Partnership

  20. Indoor airPLUS Version 1 (Rev. 01) Verification Checklist | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Version 1 (Rev. 01) Verification Checklist Indoor airPLUS Version 1 (Rev. 01) Verification Checklist The Rev. 01 checklist has been modified to reflect only the additional Indoor airPLUS requirements and their corresponding section numbers that must be met after completing the ENERGY STAR checklists. PDF icon iap_verification_checklist_rev_1.pdf More Documents & Publications Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications Version

  1. Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications Version 1 (Rev. 02) | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications Version 1 (Rev. 02) Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications Version 1 (Rev. 02) Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications Version 1 (Rev. 02), November 2013, from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. PDF icon ch_iap.pdf More Documents & Publications Indoor airPLUS Construction Specifications Indoor airPLUS Version 1 (Rev. 01) Verification Checklist DOE ZERH Webinar: Ventilation and Filtration Strategies with Indo

  2. AcqGuide35pt1rev2.doc | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    AcqGuide35pt1rev2.doc&0; AcqGuide35pt1rev2.doc&0; AcqGuide35pt1rev2.doc&0; More Documents & Publications Attachment FY2011-58 OPAM Chapter 35 - Research and Development...

  3. Clean Cities Conference to Rev Up Alternative Fuels Market

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Clean Cities Conference to Rev Up Alternative Fuels Market For more information contact: George Douglas, 303-275-4096 email: George Douglas Golden, Colo., Jan. 26, 2001 - Cleaner air and greater energy security are possible through the use of alternative fuel vehicles. The U.S. Department of Energy's 7th National Clean Cities Conference and Expo will showcase how the use of vehicles powered by fuels such as electricity, natural gas, biodiesel, propane or ethanol can both reduce pollution and cut

  4. Microsoft Word - 04-3310, Rev. 5.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Environmental Policy Statement DOE/WIPP 04-3310, Rev. 5 July 2014 The Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC (NWP), consider the protection of workers, the public, and the environment to be the highest priority of all our combined activities at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) project. We are committed to achieving and maintaining high standards of environmental quality and to providing a safe and

  5. Microsoft Word - 11-3474 Rev 0 clean

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Electronics Management Policy Statement DOE/WIPP 11-3474, Rev. 0 October 2011 Page 1 of 2 The Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Washington TRU Solutions LLC (WTS), including subcontractors and WTS affiliates, will manage its electronic equipment to ensure the environmental impacts associated with the equipment are reduced throughout its lifecycle. To accomplish this, CBFO/WTS will implement the following stewardship elements for

  6. Microsoft Word - PG470227_Rev 7_Final.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1223P Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Materials Sustainability & Pollution Prevention Program Plan New Mexico Site PG470227, Revision 7 Sandia National Laboratories New Mexico MSP2 Program Plan PG470227 February 2013 Rev 7

  7. Microsoft Word - 15-GM.02, Rev. 8 - ready to issue

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Effective Date: 09/9/13 WP 15-GM.02 Revision 8 Worker Safety and Health Program Description Cognizant Section: Safety Programs Approved by: Signature Approval on File Farok Sharif, President & Project Manager, NWP Approved by: Signature Approval on File Joe Franco, Manager, CBFO Working Copy Worker Safety and Health Program Description WP 15-GM.02, Rev. 8 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE HISTORY SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 4

  8. TDR-MIS-CRW-00000X REV 00

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    QA: N/A Yucca Mountain Project Site Environmental Report for the Yucca Mountain Project Calendar Year 2005 PGM-MGR-EC-000007 REV 00 October 2006 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Las Vegas, Nevada DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their

  9. RADIOLOGICAL DATA FOR ALARA PLANNING PURPOSES Rev. 1 Contact

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    RADIOLOGICAL DATA FOR ALARA PLANNING PURPOSES Rev. 1 Contact 1 ft 3 ft 10 ft 25 ft 50 ft 125 ft 100 mR/hr line 5 mR/hr line (R/hr) (R/hr) (R/hr) (R/hr) (R/hr) (R/hr) (R/hr) (feet) (feet) Outside of Cask (max) *Unshielded Liner (max) Top of *Unshielded Liner after the cask lid is removed *Unshielded Liner Inside of Cask/Lid Outside of Cask Lifting rig or any other support equipment Does the cask have fixed contamination that may "leach out" during transport (Yes/No)? If yes, please list

  10. Microsoft Word - Chapter 02 rev 4, implemented Nov 19, 2013

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Documented Safety Analysis Prepared by Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC Carlsbad, NM U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-EM0001971 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Carlsbad, NM NOVEMBER 2013 WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT DOE/WIPP 07-3372, REV. 4 DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSIS This document revision was prepared by Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC under contract and subject to the warranty and other obligations of that contract. Release to and Use by

  11. HNF-SD-WM-TI-740, Rev. OC

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    84047 HNF-SD-WM-TI-740, Rev. OC Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes M. J. Kupfer, A. L. Boldt, K. N. Hodgson, L. W. Shelton, B. C. Simpson, and R. A. Watrous (LMHC); M. D. LeClair (SAIC); G. 1. Borsheim (BA); R. T. Winward (MA); B. A. Higley and R. M. Orme (NHC); N. G. Colton (PNNL); S. L. Lambert and D. E. Place (Cogema); and W. W. Schulz (112S) Lockheed Martin Hanford Corporation, Richland, WA 99352 U.S. Department of Energy Contract

  12. NA-ASC-100R-04-Vol.1-Rev.0

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    100R-04-Vol.1-Rev.0 August 2004 SAND 2004-3740P Issued by Sandia National Laboratories for NNSA's Office of Advanced Simulation & Computing, NA-114. For more information, contact Dr. Dimitri Kusnezov at dimitri.kusnezov@nnsa.doe.gov ON THE COVER: These experimental images show the evolution of three gaseous cylinders (seeded with a tracer gas) that have been accelerated by a planar shock wave. The flow fields are dominated by vortices created by the shock acceleration, so the swirling red

  13. Microsoft Word - MP 5 2 Final Rev 3

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://bellview/cbfo/Procedures/ProcedureManualTOC.htm Director, Office of the National TRU Program CBFO Form 4.1-1 U. S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE CBFO MP 5.2, Rev. 3 Effective: 15 November 2010 SUBJECT: TRU WASTE SITE CERTIFICATION/RECERTIFICATION Manager, Carlsbad Field Office: //signature on file// Date: 11/4/10 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to define the processes, responsibilities, and controls for the

  14. ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) Inspection Checklists for

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    National Program Requirements | Department of Energy Inspection Checklists for National Program Requirements ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) Inspection Checklists for National Program Requirements ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) Inspection Checklists for National Program Requirements PDF icon energy_star_v3_inspection_checklists_reV07.pdf More Documents & Publications ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) National Program Requirements Indoor

  15. Microsoft Word - Press Release RECOMP 2-8-08 REV FINAL.doc | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Press Release RECOMP 2-8-08 REV FINAL.doc Microsoft Word - Press Release RECOMP 2-8-08 REV FINAL.doc PDF icon Microsoft Word - Press Release RECOMP 2-8-08 REV FINAL.doc More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - Fact Sheet Energy Speech 082508 FINAL.doc USA RS Basic Contract - Contract No.: DE-RW0000005 Microsoft Word - AL-Consolidated Approps FY 2008 as of feb 21 2008 final

  16. Memo Distributing EM-QA-001 Rev 1 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Distributing EM-QA-001 Rev 1 Memo Distributing EM-QA-001 Rev 1 This memorandum serves as a follow-up to the August 26, 2011, memorandum on implemenation of Depart of Energy (DOE) Order (O) 414.1D, Quality Assurance. PDF icon Memo Distributing EM-QA-001 Rev 1 More Documents & Publications 2012 Quality Assurance Improvement Project Plan Memo on Implementation of DOE O 414-1D

  17. Commercial Grade Dedication Procedure (LMS-PROC-116 Rev 3) | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Procedure (LMS-PROC-116 Rev 3) Commercial Grade Dedication Procedure (LMS-PROC-116 Rev 3) Enclosed is an example of a CGD procedure developed by Argonne National Labs. The procedure is in accordance to NQA-1 2008. The current version is a draft copy. PDF icon Commercial Grade Dedication Procedure (LMS-PROC-116 Rev 3) More Documents & Publications Commercial Grade Dedication Record (ANL-746 Revised) Commercial Grade Dedication Guidance Commercial Grade Dedication of Software,

  18. Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.0855_Raines Draft Rev 4 | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    55_Raines Draft Rev 4 Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.0855_Raines Draft Rev 4 PDF icon Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.0855_Raines Draft Rev 4 More Documents & Publications Enhancing Earned Value (EV) Analysis Using Project Assessment & Reporting System (PARS II) - Road Show Presentation Presentations from the 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop Microsoft PowerPoint - 07 Raines 2010 PMWS-Final BBB

  19. CRAD, Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis- July 25, 2014 (IEA CRAD 31-2, REV. 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This Criteria Review and Approach Document (IEA CRAD 31-2, REV. 0) provides objectives, criteria, and approaches for reviewing Nuclear Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis.

  20. CRAD, Hazard Analysis- July 25, 2014 (IEA CRAD 31-1, REV. 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Criteria Review and Approach Document (IEA CRAD 31-1, REV. 0) provides objectives, criteria, and approaches for reviewing Nuclear Facility Hazard Analysis.

  1. NIF Functional Requirements and Primary Criteria Rev. 1.8 September...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Technical Report: NIF Functional Requirements and Primary Criteria Rev. 1.8 September 2006 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: NIF Functional Requirements and Primary...

  2. CRAD, Emergency Management Program – February 13, 2014 (HSS CRAD 45-60, Rev. 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Emergency Management Program Inspection Criteria and Review Approach Document - 2014 Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness Review (HSS CRAD 45-60, Rev. 0)

  3. CRAD, Emergency Management Program – February 13, 2014 (HSS CRAD 45-61, Rev. 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Emergency Management Program Inspection Criteria and Review Approach Document - Exercises Program Review and Severe Event Response Evaluations (HSS CRAD 45-61, Rev. 0)

  4. NIF Functional Requirements and Primary Criteria Rev. 1.8 September...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Technical Report: NIF Functional Requirements and Primary Criteria Rev. 1.8 September 2006 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: NIF Functional Requirements and Primary ...

  5. CRAD, Nuclear Safety Delegations for Documented Safety Analysis Approval – January 8, 2015 (EA CRAD 31-09, Rev. 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    CRAD, Nuclear Safety Delegations for Documented Safety Analysis Approval – January 8, 2015 (EA CRAD 31-09, Rev. 0)

  6. User Instructions for the Systems Assessment Capability, Rev. 1, Computer Codes Volume 1: Inventory, Release, and Transport Modules

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Eslinger, Paul W.; Miley, Terri B.; Engel, David W.; Nichols, William E.; Gerhardstein, Lawrence H.; Strenge, Dennis L.; Lopresti, Charles A.; Wurstner, Signe K.

    2004-09-12

    This document contains detailed user instructions for the transport codes for Rev. 1 of the System Assessment Capability.

  7. Microsoft PowerPoint - 12 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 2 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised Microsoft PowerPoint - 12 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised PDF icon Microsoft PowerPoint - 12 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised More Documents & Publications Microsoft PowerPoint - 5.3 Item 01 Top Kill Operation Status 09 June 1400.pptx Microsoft PowerPoint - Enterprise Top Hat Phases - 07-04-2010.pptx Microsoft PowerPoint - 14 Simpson Bosco final PM Workshop Simpson Mar09_2010 revised

  8. Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1330_Rimando 110316 rev3 [Compatibility Mode] |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy 330_Rimando 110316 rev3 [Compatibility Mode] Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1330_Rimando 110316 rev3 [Compatibility Mode] PDF icon Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.1330_Rimando 110316 rev3 [Compatibility Mode] More Documents & Publications Microsoft PowerPoint - 01 Bosco PM Workshop BOSCO Feb22_2010PB final rcvd 5 Mar [Compatibility Mode] Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.0805_Tom Fox [Compatibility Mode] Microsoft PowerPoint - 15.1500_Michael Deane [Compatibility Mode]

  9. Microsoft Word - WIPP-023 WIPP FHA rev 5a 01-22-12

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    WIPP-023, REV. 5A FIRE HAZARD ANALYSIS FOR THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT Date Issued - January 2013 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC Managing the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad, NM Under Contract DE-EM001971 for the U.S. Department of Energy Fire Hazard Analysis for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant WIPP-023, Rev. 5A iii Revision Log Revision Number Date Description of Changes Pages Affected DOE/WIPP 3217, Rev. 0

  10. Microsoft Word - AcqGuide70pt15rev9-OPAM | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    pt15rev9-OPAM Microsoft Word - AcqGuide70pt15rev9-OPAM M&O Contractor Incentives - Fee, Rollover of Performance Fee, and Award Term PDF icon Microsoft Word - AcqGuide70pt15rev9-OPAM More Documents & Publications Before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security A:\CHAP05PERFASSM(REVISED).PDF� Policy Flash Search Listing (2001-2014)

  11. LFS Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 8.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on claims shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97). LFS Ex A (Rev. 8.3, 92713)...

  12. IDIQ BS Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 3.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on claims shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97). IDIQ BS Ex A (Rev. 3.3, 92713)...

  13. TM Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 7.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on claims shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97). T&M Ex A (Rev. 7.3, 92713)...

  14. IDIQ BS Ex A (Rev. 3.1, 4/9/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on claims shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97). IDIQ BS Ex A (Rev. 3.1, 4913)...

  15. CRAD, System Operating Test Procedures- October 23, 2014 (EA CRAD 31-05, Rev. 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This Criteria Review and Approach Document (EA CRAD 31-05, Rev. 0) provides objectives, criteria, and approaches for reviewing startup testing procedures for installed structures, systems, or components.

  16. DOE ZERH Webinar: Updates to the DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Specs- Rev05

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    TitleUpdates to the DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Specs - Rev05DescriptionIn the year since DOE last updated the DOE Zero Energy Ready Home specs, we've continued to track our partner feedback and...

  17. S-CHA-H-00026 Rev. A PRELIMINARY SCOPING-LEVEL HAZARD ANALYSIS

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    S-CHA-H-00026 Rev. A PRELIMINARY SCOPING-LEVEL HAZARD ANALYSIS FOR THE PROCESSING OF HGTR ... release. NameOrg:C. M. Hadden, Dep Mgr H N&CSE Date: 242015 Guidance (if ...

  18. Microsoft PowerPoint - 12 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PDF icon Microsoft PowerPoint - 12 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised More Documents & Publications Microsoft PowerPoint - 5.3 Item 01 Top Kill Operation Status 09 June ...

  19. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B3.6 for...

  20. Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03), 4/17/2013, from the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy website.

  1. ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) Inspection Checklists for National Program Requirements

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) Inspection Checklists for National Program Requirements Effective for homes permitted 2 starting 8/01/2013 Revised 6/01/2013 Page 1 of 16 As described in the ENERGY STAR Certified Homes National Program Requirements, Version 3 (Rev. 07), one prerequisite for certification is that a home must meet the requirements of the four attached checklists:  Thermal Enclosure System Rater Checklist  HVAC System Quality Installation Contractor Checklist 

  2. Fuel Cycle Potential Waste Inventory for Disposition Rev 5 | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Fuel Cycle Potential Waste Inventory for Disposition Rev 5 Fuel Cycle Potential Waste Inventory for Disposition Rev 5 The United States currently utilizes a once-through fuel cycle where used nuclear fuel is stored onsite in either wet pools or in dry storage systems with ultimate disposal envisioned in a deep mined geologic repository. This report provides an estimate of potential waste inventory and waste form characteristics for the DOE used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive

  3. Part 2, Clauses Prescribed in DEAR Parts 952 and 970 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Part 2, Clauses Prescribed in DEAR Parts 952 and 970 Part 2, Clauses Prescribed in DEAR Parts 952 and 970 PDF icon M_O_ClauseMatrix.pdf More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - Matrixpart2.doc AcqGuide70.52Matrixpart2Redo-OPAM Microsoft Word - AcqGuide70pt52Matrixpart2Redo

  4. NIF Functional Requirements and Primary Criteria Rev. 1.8 September 2006

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    (Technical Report) | SciTech Connect Technical Report: NIF Functional Requirements and Primary Criteria Rev. 1.8 September 2006 Citation Details In-Document Search Title: NIF Functional Requirements and Primary Criteria Rev. 1.8 September 2006 Authors: Patterson, R ; Samuelson, S Publication Date: 2014-09-29 OSTI Identifier: 1165807 Report Number(s): LLNL-TR-661755 DOE Contract Number: DE-AC52-07NA27344 Resource Type: Technical Report Research Org: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  5. F-Tank Farm Performance Assessment, Rev 1 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    F-Tank Farm Performance Assessment, Rev 1 F-Tank Farm Performance Assessment, Rev 1 Draft Basis for Section 3116 Determination for Closure of F-Tank Farm at the Savannah River Site. In accordance with NDAA Section 3116, certain waste from reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel is not high-level waste if the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the NRC, determines that the criteria in NDAA Section 3116(a) are met. This Draft FTF 3116 Basis Document shows that those criteria are satisfied, to

  6. Fuel Economy Sticker Revs Up Used Car Sales | Department of Energy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Fuel Economy Sticker Revs Up Used Car Sales Fuel Economy Sticker Revs Up Used Car Sales May 1, 2014 - 2:29pm Addthis FuelEconomy.gov’s newest tool -- the Used Car Fuel Economy Label -- makes it easier for consumers to compare used cars, select the most fuel-efficient model and save money at the pump. | Photo by the Energy Department. FuelEconomy.gov's newest tool -- the Used Car Fuel Economy Label -- makes it easier for consumers to compare used cars, select the most fuel-efficient model

  7. Acquisition Letter No. AL 2015-04 - Rev. 2 - 08/25/2015 | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy 4 - Rev. 2 - 08/25/2015 Acquisition Letter No. AL 2015-04 - Rev. 2 - 08/25/2015 DATE: August 25, 2015 TO: Procurement Directors/Contracting Officers FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division D, Titles III and V, and Division E, Title VII of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Pub. L. No 113-235. SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2015-04

  8. Green Racing Series Revs Engines with Renewable Fuel from INEOS Bio |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Racing Series Revs Engines with Renewable Fuel from INEOS Bio Green Racing Series Revs Engines with Renewable Fuel from INEOS Bio March 17, 2014 - 2:55pm Addthis A racecar heads into the pits for refueling during the 12 Hours of Sebring in Florida on Saturday. Integrated biorefinery INEOS Bio now supplies cellulosic ethanol to VP Racing Fuels, which fuels the action at TUDOR United SportsCar Championship series races. | Photo by Natalie Committee, Energy Department A

  9. Colorado - C.R.S. 40-4-102 - Extensions and Improvements Prescribed...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Colorado - C.R.S. 40-4-102 - Extensions and Improvements Prescribed - WhenLegal Abstract This section...

  10. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Relocation of Buildings under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.22 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform relocation of buildings (including, but not limited to, trailers and

  11. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    19, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Traffic Flow Adjustments under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.32 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform traffic flow adjustments to existing roads (including, but not limited

  12. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B3.1 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform site characterization and environmental

  13. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8, Rev 2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Installation or Relocation of Machinery and Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.31 for Calendar Year 2015. 11. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform installation or relocation and operation of

  14. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9, Rev 2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Training Exercises and Simulations under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.2 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform training exercises and simulations (including, but not limited

  15. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Installation or Relocation of Machinery and Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.31 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform installation or relocation and operation of

  16. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Actions to Conserve Energy or Water under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B5.1 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform actions to conserve energy or water, demonstrate potential

  17. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9, Rev 1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facilities to Store Packaged Hazardous Waste for 90 Days or Less under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B6.4 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform siting, construction, modification,

  18. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, Rev 2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Support Buildings under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.l5 for Calendar Year 2015. II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform siting, construction or modification, and operation of support buildings and

  19. Microsoft Word - Interim Work Authorization Form rev 2-9.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    rev. 2/9/05 * Submit original form to M. Montalvo, MS 69, promptly on completion of work. INTERIM Work Authorization Process for Activities by Non-SSRL Workers at SSRL This Work Authorization Process applies to all maintenance, repair, and installation work performed at SSRL by non-SSRL workers. All work must be initiated by a technically qualified SSRL staff person (e.g. accelerator system manager, shop manager, facilities staff member, beam line engineer, etc.) who will serve as the

  20. Microsoft Word - IARC_Expression of interest_Rev5_Nov2012.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Rev.01/13/2012 Fermilab Technology Applications Program Expression of Interest Project/Proposal Name: Company/Institution Street Address Phone Company URL City, State, Zip Code Fax Contact Person Name Street Address Phone Title City, State, Zip Code Email Do you wish to have information in this EOI treated as proprietary? Yes No (please circle one) Provide additional comments if desired. Comments: Is your interest in the Fermilab Technology Applications Program "general" in nature or

  1. Microsoft Word - S07834_2011 Ann Rpt_ag comment revs

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    7 6.0 References ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 2004. Toxicological Profile for Strontium, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, April. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 1994. Baseline Risk Assessment of Ground Water Contamination at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site at Shiprock, New Mexico, DOE/AL/62350-48F, Rev. 1, Albuquerque Operations Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico, April. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2000. Final Site Observational

  2. Rev.1 U.S. D EPARTMENT OF ENERGY Contractor Records Custodian Authorization

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    4 (9-2014) Rev.1 U.S. D EPARTMENT OF ENERGY Contractor Records Custodian Authorization SECTION I. Authorization Pursuant to DOE Order 243.1B, Records Management Program, Attachment 1, Contractor Requirements Document, (Name) , employee of (Contractor Organization) , is hereby authorized to function as a Contractor Records Custodian for (DOE Element) . The incumbent responsibilities include complying with the requirements of the noted Contract Requirements Document (CRD), including flowing down

  3. Microsoft Word - CX Posting Implementation Guidance -- Rev1 -- 5-25-10.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Rev. 1 - May 25, 2010 Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance 1 Implementation Guidance for the DOE Policy on Documentation and Online Posting of Categorical Exclusion Determinations: NEPA Process Transparency and Openness To further transparency and openness in its implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Department of Energy (DOE) has established a policy with regard to the online posting of certain categorical exclusion determinations. Under the policy, each Program

  4. DOE/NV/11718--449-REV1 INTEGRATED CLOSURE AND MONITORING PLAN

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    449-REV1 INTEGRATED CLOSURE AND MONITORING PLAN for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site Prepared by Prepared for National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office under Contract Number DE-AC08-96NV11718 September 2001 DISCLAIMER NOTICE Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or

  5. Rev 8 NEVADA NATIONAL SECURITY SITE - WASTE RIS VAB ACCOUNTABLE NUCLEAR MATERIALS

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7/14 Rev 8 NEVADA NATIONAL SECURITY SITE - WASTE RIS VAB ACCOUNTABLE NUCLEAR MATERIALS AUTHORIZATION TO SHIP WASTE Return To: Date: NNSS Material Control and Accountability Program (NMR@nv.doe.gov) David Klamann: 702-295-7872 Laura Harris: 702-295-3760 Mary Alice Price: 702-295-4812 Fax No.: 702-295-4215 Waste Shipment #: 741#: Anticipated Arrival Week: Waste Generator Org & Address: Waste Generator Point of Contact: Phone: Fax: Please use the column that applies to your site. DOE M 470.4-6

  6. National Program Requirements ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 08)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Program Requirements ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 08) Required for homes permitted 11 starting 07/01/2016 Revised 07/01/2015 Page 1 of 4 Eligibility Requirements The following homes are eligible to earn the ENERGY STAR:  Detached dwelling units 1 (e.g. single family homes); OR  Dwelling units 1 in any multifamily building with 4 units or fewer; OR  Dwelling units 1 in multifamily buildings with 3 stories or fewer above-grade 2,3 ; OR  Dwelling units 1 in multifamily

  7. Permeability computation on a REV with an immersed finite element method

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Laure, P. [Laboratoire J.-A. Dieudonne, CNRS UMR 6621, Universite de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice, Cedex 02 (France); Puaux, G.; Silva, L.; Vincent, M. [MINES ParisTech, CEMEF-Centre de Mise en Forme des Materiaux, CNRS UMR 7635, BP 207 1 rue Claude, Daunesse 06904 Sophia Antipolis cedex (France)

    2011-05-04

    An efficient method to compute permeability of fibrous media is presented. An immersed domain approach is used to represent the porous material at its microscopic scale and the flow motion is computed with a stabilized mixed finite element method. Therefore the Stokes equation is solved on the whole domain (including solid part) using a penalty method. The accuracy is controlled by refining the mesh around the solid-fluid interface defined by a level set function. Using homogenisation techniques, the permeability of a representative elementary volume (REV) is computed. The computed permeabilities of regular fibre packings are compared to classical analytical relations found in the bibliography.

  8. Microsoft Word - 01-3199 Rev 6 Final w_o signature

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    WIPP 01-3199 Recertification Project Plan Revision 6 February 2013 This document supersedes DOE/WIPP 01-3199, Revision 5. U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office 2 Recertification Project Plan Revision 6 February 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office //signature on file// 02/14/2013 Jose R. Franco / Date Manager, Carlsbad Field Office Recertification Project Plan DOE/WIPP 01-3199, Rev. 6 3 This document has been submitted as required to: U.S. Department of Energy Office of

  9. ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) National Program Requirements

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Certified Homes, Version 3 (Rev. 07) National Program Requirements Effective for homes permitted 14 starting 8/01/2013 Revised 6/01/2013 Page 1 of 6 Certifying Homes The following homes are eligible to earn the ENERGY STAR:  Detached dwelling units 1 (e.g. single family homes); OR  Dwelling units 1 in any multifamily building with 4 units or fewer; OR  Dwelling units 1 in multifamily buildings with 3 stories or fewer above-grade 2,3 ; OR  Dwelling units 1 in multifamily buildings

  10. Microsoft Word - Fly Cutting Request Formrev4-11rev.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Fly Cutting Request Form rev 4/11 Contact Information Date _____/___/_____ Technical Information Sample ID Material to be Cut (Su8, PMMA, Graphite, other) Thickness (microns) Initial Thickness (microns) Final Thickness (microns) Actual 1 2 3 4 5 6 Comments or special instructions necessary for satisfactory flycutting  Forward form and samples to Varshni Singh, 225-578-0248, Room #130, vsingh2@lsu.edu  For technical issues contact Varshni Singh, 225-578-0248, Room #130, vsingh2@lsu.edu 

  11. CRAD, New Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis and Technical Safety Requirements- December 2, 2014 (EA CRAD 31-07, Rev. 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    New Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis and Technical Safety Requirements Criteria Review and Approach Document (EA CRAD 31-07, Rev. 0)

  12. UTILITY_ID","UTILNAME","STATE_CODE","YEAR","MONTH","RES_REV (Thousand $)","RES_S

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    MwH)","RES_CONS ","COM_REV (Thousand $)","COM_SALES (MwH)","COM_CONS","IND_REV (Thousand $)","IND_SALES (MwH)","IND_CONS","OTH_REV (Thousand $)","OTH_SALES (MwH)","OTH_CONS","TOT_REV (Thousand $)","TOT_SALES (MwH)","TOT_CONS" 0,"State Level Adjustment","AK",2006,1,4505,21935,0,6801,28853,0,1284,11667,0,,,0,12590,62454,0 213,"Alaska

  13. Safeguards Summary Event List (SSEL), January 1, 1990--December 31, 1996, Vol. 2, Rev. 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-07-01

    The Safeguards Summary Event List (SSEL), Vol. 2, Rev. 5, provides brief summaries of several hundred safeguards-related events involving nuclear material or facilities regulated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which occurred and were reported from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1996. Because of public interest, the Miscellaneous category includes a few events which involve either source material, byproduct material, or natural uranium which are exempt from safeguards requirements. Events are described under the categories of Bomb-related, Intrusion, Missing and/or Allegedly Stolen, Transportation-related, Tampering/Vandalism, Arson, Firearms, Radiological Sabotage, Nonradiological Sabotage, and Miscellaneous. The information contained in the event descriptions is derived primarily from official NRC reporting channels.

  14. The smoke-fireplume model : tool for eventual application to prescribed burns and wildland fires.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brown, D. F.; Dunn, W. E.; Lazaro, M. A.; Policastro, A. J.

    1999-08-17

    Land managers are increasingly implementing strategies that employ the use of fire in prescribed burns to sustain ecosystems and plan to sustain the rate of increase in its use over the next five years. In planning and executing expanded use of fire in wildland treatment it is important to estimate the human health and safety consequences, property damage, and the extent of visibility degradation from the resulting conflagration-pyrolysis gases, soot and smoke generated during flaming, smoldering and/or glowing fires. Traditional approaches have often employed the analysis of weather observations and forecasts to determine whether a prescribed burn will affect populations, property, or protected Class I areas. However, the complexity of the problem lends itself to advanced PC-based models that are simple to use for both calculating the emissions from the burning of wildland fuels and the downwind dispersion of smoke and other products of pyrolysis, distillation, and/or fuels combustion. These models will need to address the effects of residual smoldering combustion, including plume dynamics and optical effects. In this paper, we discuss a suite of tools that can be applied for analyzing dispersion. These tools include the dispersion models FIREPLUME and SMOKE, together with the meteorological preprocessor SEBMET.

  15. CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NSN 7540-01-152-8070 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED DE-AC02-09CH11466/0220 PAGE OF PAGES 2 2 NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR The Trustees of Princeton University 14. Description of Amendment/Modification (continued): a. The following clauses will be revised or inserted in PART I, SECTION H, SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS, and applicable TABLE OF CONTENTS modified: CLAUSE H.22 - EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION:

  16. Final Report - Sulfate Solubility in RPP-WTP HLW Glasses, VSL-06R6780-1, Rev. 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kruger, Albert A.; Pegg, I. L.; Feng, A.; Gan, H.; Kot, W. K.

    2013-12-03

    This report describes the results of work and testing specified by Test Specifications 24590-HLW-TSP-RT-01-006 Rev 1, Test Plans VSL-02T7800-1 Rev 1 and Test Exceptions 24590-HLW-TEF-RT-05-00007. The work and any associated testing followed established quality assurance requirements and were conducted as authorized. The descriptions provided in this report are an accurate account of both the conduct of the work and the data collected. Results required by the Test Plans are reported. Also reported are any unusual or anomalous occurrences that are different from the starting hypotheses. The test results and this report have been reviewed and verified.

  17. Dynamic (G2) Model Design Document, 24590-WTP-MDD-PR-01-002, Rev. 12

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Deng, Yueying; Kruger, Albert A.

    2013-12-16

    The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Statement of Work (Department of Energy Contract DE-AC27-01RV14136, Section C) requires the contractor to develop and use process models for flowsheet analyses and pre-operational planning assessments. The Dynamic (G2) Flowsheet is a discrete-time process model that enables the project to evaluate impacts to throughput from eventdriven activities such as pumping, sampling, storage, recycle, separation, and chemical reactions. The model is developed by the Process Engineering (PE) department, and is based on the Flowsheet Bases, Assumptions, and Requirements Document (24590-WTP-RPT-PT-02-005), commonly called the BARD. The terminologies of Dynamic (G2) Flowsheet and Dynamic (G2) Model are interchangeable in this document. The foundation of this model is a dynamic material balance governed by prescribed initial conditions, boundary conditions, and operating logic. The dynamic material balance is achieved by tracking the storage and material flows within the plant as time increments. The initial conditions include a feed vector that represents the waste compositions and delivery sequence of the Tank Farm batches, and volumes and concentrations of solutions in process equipment before startup. The boundary conditions are the physical limits of the flowsheet design, such as piping, volumes, flowrates, operation efficiencies, and physical and chemical environments that impact separations, phase equilibriums, and reaction extents. The operating logic represents the rules and strategies of running the plant.

  18. OO84O4c6sP HNF-SD-WM-II-740, Rev. OB

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    OO84O4c6sP HNF-SD-WM-II-740, Rev. OB Standard Inventories of Chemicals and Radionuclides in Hanford Site Tank Wastes M. J. Kupfer, A. L. Boldt, K. M. Hodgson, 1. W. Shelton, B. C. Simpson, and R. A. Watrous (LMHC); M. D. LeClair (SAIC); G. L. Borsheini (BA); R. T. Winward (MA); B. A. Higley and R. M. Orme (NHC); N.. G. Colton (PNNL); S. L. Lambert and D. E. Place (SESC); and W. W. Schulz (W S) Lockheed Martin Hanford Corporation, Richland, WA 99352 U.S. Department of Energy Contract

  19. ES&H Manual Welding and Brazing Supplement ISSUING AUTHORITY SUPPLEMENT AUTHOR APPROVAL DATE REVIEW DATE REV.

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ES&H Manual Welding and Brazing Supplement ISSUING AUTHORITY SUPPLEMENT AUTHOR APPROVAL DATE REVIEW DATE REV. Page 1 of 33 QA/CI Dept. Welding Technical Committee 01/21/15 01/21/20 2.1 This document is controlled as an on line file. It may be printed but the print copy is not a controlled document. It is the user's responsibility to ensure that the document is the same revision as the current on line file. This copy was printed on 1/26/2016. 1 Purpose and Scope This supplement provides the

  20. FBP-ER-RIFS-BG-PLN-0036 Rev. 6 1 DOE/PPPO/03-0383&D4

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    BG-PLN-0036 Rev. 6 1 DOE/PPPO/03-0383&D4 Aerial photo of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, showing the approximate 1,000-acre industrialized area within Perimeter Road PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD NOVEMBER 12, 2014 TO JANUARY 10, 2015 HOW YOU CAN PARTICIPATE Read this Proposed Plan and review related documents in the Administrative Record. Comment on this Proposed Plan by mail, email, phone, or fax to: Ms. Kristi Wiehle Department of Energy P.O. Box 370 Piketon, Ohio 45661 Email:

  1. Microsoft Word - V-PMP-F-00085 Rev 0 10-27-Project Lessons Learned - PS.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Savannah River Nuclear Solutions V-PMP-F-00085 Rev 0 Project Y473 Waste Solidification Building October 21, 2015 Lessons Learned Report Page 2 of 25 Project Background Summary Savannah River Site The Waste Solidification Building is located within the F Area of the Savannah River Site (SRS). SRS occupies about 300 square miles (192,323 acres) on the upper Atlantic Coastal Plain of South Carolina and is located approximately 25 miles southeast of Augusta, Georgia; 22 miles south of Aiken, South

  2. Microsoft Word - WD Proposed Plan D5 R8 MASTER 10-29-14 _final with reply mail_ rev 1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    WD-PLN-0034, Rev. 8 1 DOE/PPPO/03-0312&D5 Aerial photo of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant showing the three large process buildings (center of photo) and other support facilities, facing southwest PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD NOVEMBER 12, 2014 TO JANUARY 10, 2015 HOW YOU CAN PARTICIPATE Read this Proposed Plan and review related documents in the Administrative Record. Comment on this Proposed Plan by mail, email, or fax to: Ms. Kristi Wiehle Department of Energy P.O. Box 370 Piketon, Ohio

  3. UTILITY_ID","UTILNAME","STATE_CODE","YEAR","MONTH","RES_REV (Thousand $)","RES_S

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    OTH_REV (Thousand $)","OTH_SALES (MWh)","OTH_CONS","TOT_REV (Thousand $)","TOT_SALES (MWh)","TOT_CONS" 0,"State Level Adjustment","AK","2007R",1,5766,24179,0,7398,30009,0,1385.504,7829.663,0,,,0,14549.504,62017.663,0 213,"Alaska Electric Light&Power Co","AK","2007R",1,1479,14609,13602,981,11953,2118,390.496,5260.337,99,0,0,0,2850.496,31822.337,15819 219,"Alaska Power

  4. Amchitka Mud Pit Sites 2006 Post-Closure Monitoring and Inspection Report, Amchitka Island, Alaska, Rev. No.: 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Matthews, Patrick

    2006-09-01

    In 2001, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA/NSO) remediated six areas associated with Amchitka mud pit release sites located on Amchitka Island, Alaska. This included the construction of seven closure caps. To ensure the integrity and effectiveness of remedial action, the mud pit sites are to be inspected every five years as part of DOE's long-term monitoring and surveillance program. In August of 2006, the closure caps were inspected in accordance with the ''Post-Closure Monitoring and Inspection Plan for Amchitka Island Mud Pit Release Sites'' (Rev. 0, November 2005). This post-closure monitoring report provides the 2006 cap inspection results.

  5. Final Report - DuraMelter 100 Tests to Support LAW Glass Formulation Correlation Development, VSL-06R6480-1, Rev. 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kruger, Albert A.; Muller, I. S.; Gong, W.; Pegg, I. L.; Matlack, K. S.

    2013-12-03

    This report describes the results of work and testing specified by Test Specifications 24590-LAW-TSP-RT-04-004, Rev. 0, Test Plans VSL-05T5480-1, Rev. 0 and Text Exceptions 24590-LAW-TEF-RT-05-00002. The work and any associated testing followed established quality assurance requirements and was conducted as authorized. The descriptions provided in this test report are an accurate account of both the conduct of the work and the data collected. Results required by the Test Plan are reported. Also reported are any unusual or anomalous occurences that are different from the starting hypotheses. The test results and this report have been reviewed and verified.

  6. Final Report for SERDP Project RC-1649: Advanced Chemical Measurements of Smoke from DoD-prescribed Burns

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Johnson, Timothy J.; Weise, David; Lincoln, E. N.; Sams, Robert L.; Cameron, Melanie; Veres, Patrick; Yokelson, Robert J.; Urbanski, Shawn; Profeta, Luisa T.; Williams, S.; Gilman, Jessica; Kuster, W. C.; Akagi, Sheryl; Stockwell, Chelsea E.; Mendoza, Albert; Wold, Cyle E.; Warneke, Carsten; de Gouw, Joost A.; Burling, Ian R.; Reardon, James; Schneider, Matthew D.; Griffith, David WT; Roberts, James M.

    2013-12-17

    Objectives: Project RC-1649, Advanced Chemical Measurement of Smoke from DoD-prescribed Burns was undertaken to use advanced instrumental techniques to study in detail the particulate and vapor-phase chemical composition of the smoke that results from prescribed fires used as a land management tool on DoD bases, particularly bases in the southeastern U.S. The statement of need (SON) called for (1) improving characterization of fuel consumption and (2) improving characterization of air emissions under both flaming and smoldering conditions with respect to volatile organic compounds, heavy metals, and reactive gases. The measurements and fuels were from several bases throughout the southeast (Camp Lejeune, Ft. Benning, and Ft. Jackson) and were carried out in collaboration and conjunction with projects 1647 (models) and 1648 (particulates, SW bases). Technical Approach: We used an approach that featured developing techniques for measuring biomass burning emission species in both the laboratory and field and developing infrared (IR) spectroscopy in particular. Using IR spectroscopy and other methods, we developed emission factors (EF, g of effluent per kg of fuel burned) for dozens of chemical species for several common southeastern fuel types. The major measurement campaigns were laboratory studies at the Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (FSL) as well as field campaigns at Camp Lejeune, NC, Ft. Jackson, SC, and in conjunction with 1648 at Vandenberg AFB, and Ft. Huachuca. Comparisons and fusions of laboratory and field data were also carried out, using laboratory fuels from the same bases. Results: The project enabled new technologies and furthered basic science, mostly in the area of infrared spectroscopy, a broadband method well suited to biomass burn studies. Advances in hardware, software and supporting reference data realized a nearly 20x improvement in sensitivity and now provide quantitative IR spectra for potential detection of ~60 new species and actual field quantification of several new species such as nitrous acid, glycolaldehyde, ?-/?-pinene and D-limonene. The new reference data also permit calculation of the global warming potential (GWP) of the greenhouse gases by enabling 1) detection of their ambient concentrations, and 2) quantifying their ability to absorb IR radiation.

  7. RL-719 (REV 8)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  8. STEONOV2000Rev1

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    November 2000 Overview Oil prices are defying gravity, remaining well above $30.00 per barrel ($33.10 for WTI in October and similar levels for the first week of November). This situation persists despite estimates of significant world production above demand requirements and despite another round of announced OPEC increases. Israeli/Palestinian tensions notwithstanding, we do not see how prices can remain detached from the corrective forces of the world market if production is as high as is

  9. Spring 2013 Rev3

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    to For- mer DDFO 4 Pojoaque Val- ley Student Art Show 5 WM Committee Rec 2013-02 6 Social Media 6 N O R T H E R N N E W M E X I C O C I T I Z E N S ' A D V I S O R Y B O A R...

  10. Summer 2013 Rev 1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    the Buck- man 4 Mercury SEIS Hearing 5 Science in New Mexico 5 NNMCAB Project 6 NNMCAB Social Media 6 N O R T H E R N N E W M E X I C O C I T I Z E N S ' A D V I S O R Y B O A R...

  11. TRACKED VEHICLE Rev 75

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Raby, Eric Y.

    2007-05-08

    Revision 75 of the Tracked Vehicle software is a soft real-time simulation of a differentially steered, tracked mobile robot, which, because of the track flippers, resembles the iRobot PackBot (http://www.irobot.com/). Open source libraries are used for the physics engine (http://www.ode.org/), the display and user interface (http://www.mathies.com/cpw/), and the program command line and configuration file parameters (http://www.boost.org/). The simulation can be controlled by a USB joystick or the keyboard. The configuration file contains demonstration model parameters of no particular vehicle. This simulation can be used as a starting point for those doing tracked vehicle simulations. This simulation software is essentially a research tool which can be modified and adapted for certain types of tracked vehicle research. An open source license allows an individual researchers to tailor the code to their specific research needs.

  12. TRACKED VEHICLE Rev 75

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    2007-05-08

    Revision 75 of the Tracked Vehicle software is a soft real-time simulation of a differentially steered, tracked mobile robot, which, because of the track flippers, resembles the iRobot PackBot (http://www.irobot.com/). Open source libraries are used for the physics engine (http://www.ode.org/), the display and user interface (http://www.mathies.com/cpw/), and the program command line and configuration file parameters (http://www.boost.org/). The simulation can be controlled by a USB joystick or the keyboard. The configuration file contains demonstration model parametersmore » of no particular vehicle. This simulation can be used as a starting point for those doing tracked vehicle simulations. This simulation software is essentially a research tool which can be modified and adapted for certain types of tracked vehicle research. An open source license allows an individual researchers to tailor the code to their specific research needs.« less

  13. Composition of carbonaceous smoke particles from prescribed burning of a Canadian boreal forest: 1. Organic aerosol characterization by gas chromatography

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mazurek, M.A.; Laterza, C.; Newman, L.; Daum, P.; Cofer, W.R. III; Levine, J.S.; Winstead, E.L.

    1995-06-01

    In this study we examine the molecular organic constituents (C8 to C40 lipid compounds) collected as smoke particles from a Canadian boreal forest prescribed burn. Of special interest are (1) the molecular identity of polar organic aerosols, and (2) the amount of polar organic matter relative to the total mass of aerosol particulate carbon. Organic extracts of smoke aerosol particles show complex distributions of the lipid compounds when analyzed by capillary gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The molecular constituents present as smoke aerosol are grouped into non-polar (hydrocarbons) and polar {minus}2 oxygen atoms) subtractions. The dominant chemical species found in the boreal forest smoke aerosol are unaltered resin compounds (C20 terpenes) which are abundant in unburned conifer wood, plus thermally altered wood lignins and other polar aromatic hydrocarbons. Our results show that smoke aerosols contain molecular tracers which are related to the biofuel consumed. These smoke tracers can be related structurally back to the consumed softwood and hardwood vegetation. In addition, combustion of boreal forest materials produces smoke aerosol particles that are both oxygen-rich and chemically complex, yielding a carbonaceous aerosol matrix that is enriched in polar substances. As a consequence, emissions of carbonaceous smoke particles from large-scale combustion of boreal forest land may have a disproportionate effect on regional atmospheric chemistry and on cloud microphysical processes.

  14. Personal PM2.5 exposure among wildland firefighters working at prescribed forest burns in southeastern United States.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Adetona, Olorunfemi; Dunn, Kevin; Hall, Daniel, B.; Achtemeier, Gary; Stock, Allison; Naeher, Luke, P.

    2011-07-15

    This study investigated occupational exposure to wood and vegetative smoke in a group of 28 forest firefighters at prescribed forest burns in a southeastern U.S. forest during the winters of 2003-2005. During burn activities, 203 individual person-day PM{sub 2.5} and 149 individual person-day CO samples were collected; during non-burn activities, 37 person-day PM{sub 2.5} samples were collected as controls. Time-activity diaries and post-work shift questionnaires were administered to identify factors influencing smoke exposure and to determine how accurately the firefighters qualitative assessment estimated their personal level of smoke exposure with discrete responses: 'none' or 'very little,' 'low,' 'moderate,' 'high,' and 'very high.' An average of 6.7 firefighters were monitored per burn, with samples collected on 30 burn days and 7 non-burn days. Size of burn plots ranged from 1-2745 acres (avg = 687.8). Duration of work shift ranged from 6.8-19.4 hr (avg = 10.3 hr) on burn days. Concentration of PM{sub 2.5} ranged from 5.9-2673 {mu}g/m{sup 3} on burn days. Geometric mean PM{sub 2.5} exposure was 280 {mu}g/m{sup 3} (95% CL = 140, 557 {mu}g/m{sup 3}, n = 177) for burn day samples, and 16 {mu}g/m{sup 3} (95% CL = 10, 26 {mu}g/m{sup 3}, n = 35) on non-burn days. Average measured PM{sub 2.5} differed across levels of the firefighters categorical self-assessments of exposure (p < 0.0001): none to very little = 120 {mu}g/m{sup 3} (95% CL = 71, 203 {mu}g/m{sup 3}) and high to very high = 664 {mu}g/m{sup 3} (95% CL = 373, 1185 {mu}g/m{sup 3}); p < 0.0001 on burn days. Time-weighted average PM{sub 2.5} and personal CO averaged over the run times of PM{sub 2.5} pumps were correlated (correlation coefficient estimate, r = 0.79; CLs: 0.72, 0.85). Overall occupational exposures to particulate matter were low, but results indicate that exposure could exceed the ACGIH{reg_sign}-recommended threshold limit value of 3 mg/m{sup 3} for respirable particulate matter in a few extreme situations. Self-assessed exposure levels agreed with measured concentrations of PM{sub 2.5}. Correlation analysis shows that either PM{sub 2.5} or CO could be used as a surrogate measure of exposure to woodsmoke at prescribed burns.

  15. Airborne and ground-based measurements of the trace gases and particles emitted from prescribed fires in the United States

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Burling, Ian; Yokelson, Robert J.; Akagi, Sheryl; Urbanski, Shawn; Wold, Cyle E.; Griffith, David WT; Johnson, Timothy J.; Reardon, James; Weise, David

    2011-12-07

    We measured the emission factors for 19 trace gas species and particulate matter (PM2.5) from 14 prescribed fires in chaparral and oak savanna in the southwestern US, as well as pine forest understory in the southeastern US and Sierra Nevada mountains of California. These are likely the most extensive emission factor field measurements for temperate biomass burning to date and the only published emission factors for temperate oak savanna fuels. This study helps close the gap in emissions data available for temperate zone fires relative to tropical biomass burning. We present the first field measurements of the biomass burning emissions of glycolaldehyde, a possible precursor for aqueous phase secondary organic aerosol formation. We also measured the emissions of phenol, another aqueous phase secondary organic aerosol precursor. Our data confirm previous suggestions that urban deposition can impact the NOx emission factors and thus subsequent plume chemistry. For two fires, we measured the emissions in the convective smoke plume from our airborne platform at the same time the unlofted residual smoldering combustion emissions were measured with our ground-based platform after the flame front passed through. The smoke from residual smoldering combustion was characterized by emission factors for hydrocarbon and oxygenated organic species that were up to ten times higher than in the lofted plume, including significant 1,3-butadiene and isoprene concentrations which were not observed in the lofted plume. This should be considered in modeling the air quality impacts of smoke that disperses at ground level, and we show that the normally-ignored unlofted emissions can also significantly impact estimates of total emissions. Preliminary evidence of large emissions of monoterpenes was seen in the residual smoldering spectra, but we have not yet quantified these emissions. These data should lead to an improved capacity to model the impacts of biomass burning in similar ecosystems.

  16. Coupling field and laboratory measurements to estimate the emission factors of identified and unidentified trace gases for prescribed fires

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yokelson, Robert J.; Burling, Ian R.; Gilman, Jessica; Warneke, Carsten; Stockwell, Chelsea E.; de Gouw, Joost A.; Akagi, Sheryl; Urbanski, Shawn; Veres, Patrick; Roberts, James M.; Kuster, W. C.; Reardon, James; Griffith, David WT; Johnson, Timothy J.; Hosseini, SeyedEhsan; Miller, J. Wayne; Cocker, David R.; Jung, H.; Weise, David

    2013-01-07

    Vegetative fuels commonly consumed in prescribed fires were collected from five locations in the southeastern and southwestern U.S. and burned in a series of 77 fires at the U.S. Forest Service Fire Sciences Laboratory in Missoula, Montana. The particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions were measured by gravimetric filter sampling with subsequent analysis for elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), and 38 elements. The trace gas emissions were measured with a large suite of state-of-the-art instrumentation including an open-path Fourier transform infrared (OP FTIR) spectrometer, proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), proton-transfer ion-trap mass spectrometry (PIT-MS), negative-ion proton-transfer chemical-ionization mass spectrometry (NI-PT-CIMS), and gas chromatography with MS detection (GC-MS). 204 trace gas species (mostly non-methane organic compounds (NMOC)) were identified and quantified with the above instruments. An additional 152 significant peaks in the unit mass resolution mass spectra were quantified, but either could not be identified or most of the signal at that molecular mass was unaccounted for by identifiable species. As phase II of this study, we conducted airborne and ground-based sampling of the emissions from real prescribed fires mostly in the same land management units where the fuels for the lab fires were collected. A broad variety, but smaller number of species (21 trace gas species and PM2.5) was measured on 14 fires in chaparral and oak savanna in the southwestern US, as well as pine forest understory in the southeastern US and Sierra Nevada mountains of California. These extensive field measurements of emission factors (EF) for temperate biomass burning are useful both for modeling and to examine the representativeness of our lab fire EF. The lab/field EF ratio for the pine understory fuels was not statistically different from one, on average. However, our lab EF for smoldering compounds emitted by burning the semi-arid SW fuels should likely be increased by about a factor of 2.7 to better represent field fires. Based on the lab/field comparison, we present a table with emission factors for 365 pyrogenic species (including unidentified species) for 4 broad fuel types: pine understory, semi-arid shrublands, evergreen canopy, and duff. To our knowledge this is the most complete measurement of biomass burning emissions to date and it should enable improved representation of smoke in atmospheric models. The results provide important insights into the nature of smoke. For example, ~35% (range from 16-71%) of the mass of gas-phase NMOC species was attributed to the species that we could not identify. These unidentified species are likely not represented in most models, but some provision should be made for the fact that they will react in the atmosphere. In addition, the total mass of gas-phase NMOC divided by the mass of co-emitted PM2.5 averaged ~2.6 for the main fire types with a range from ~1.8-8.8. About 36-63% of the NMOC were likely semivolatile or of intermediate volatility. Thus, the gas-phase NMOC represent a large reservoir of potential precursors for secondary formation of organic aerosol. For the one fire in organic soil (Alaskan duff) about 28% of the emitted carbon was present as gas-phase NMOC in contrast to the other fuels for which NMOC accounted for only ~1-3% of emitted carbon. 71% of the mass of NMOC emitted by the smoldering duff was un-identified. The duff results highlight the need to learn more about the emissions from smoldering organic soils. The ?NMOC/NOx-as-NO ratio was consistently about ten for the main fire types when accounting for all NMOC, indicating strongly NOx-limited O3 production conditions. Finally, the fuel consumption per unit area was measured on 6 of the 14 prescribed fires and averaged 7.08 2.09 (1?) Mg ha-1.

  17. May 5, 2015, Federal Technical Capability Program Face to Face Meeting - Proposal to change FacRep Qualifications, Rev 0.1

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Proposal to change FacRep Qualifications, Rev 0.1 Understanding the DOE-STD-1063 is up for revision (or will be shortly) and that 20 years as a FR (8 as a supervisor) has exposed me to many things, I find it is easier to start a discussion if something (anything!) is on paper as opposed to ideas being tossed out without reference. My time as an FR has shown me that our T&Q process is onerous, time-consuming and possibly not targeted at the actual need, and that some portions of it do not

  18. Effects of overstory composition and prescribed fire on fuel loading across a heterogeneous managed landscape in the southeastern USA.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Parresol, Bernard, R.; Scott, Joe, H.; Andreu, Anne; Prichard, Susan; Kurth, Laurie

    2012-01-01

    In the southeastern USA, land use history, forest management and natural geomorphic features have created heterogeneous fuel loads. This apparent temporal and spatial variation in fuel loads make it difficult to reliably assess potential fire behavior from remotely sensed canopy variables to determine risk and to prescribe treatments. We examined this variation by exploring the relationships between overstory forest vegetation attributes, recent fire history, and selected surface fuel components across an 80,000 ha contiguous landscape. Measurements of dead and live vegetation components of surface fuels were obtained from 624 permanent plots, or about 1 plot per 100 ha of forest cover. Within forest vegetation groups, we modeled the relationship between individual surface fuel components and overstory stand age, basal area, site quality and recent fire history, then stochastically predicted fuel loads across the landscape using the same linkage variables. The fraction of the plot variation, i.e., R2, explained by predictive models for individual fuel components ranged from 0.05 to 0.66 for dead fuels and 0.03 to 0.97 for live fuels in pine dominated vegetation groups. Stand age and basal area were generally more important than recent fire history for predicting fuel loads. Mapped fuel loads using these regressor variables showed a very heterogeneous landscape even at the scale of a few square kilometers. The mapped patterns corresponded to stand based forest management disturbances that are reflected in age, basal area, and fire history. Recent fire history was significant in explaining variation in litter and duff biomass. Stand basal area was positively and consistently related to dead fuel biomass in most groups and was present in many predictive equations. Patterns in live fuel biomass were related to recent fire history, but the patterns were not consistent among forest vegetation groups. Age and basal area were related to live fuels in a complex manner that is likely confounded with periodic disturbances that disrupt stand dynamics. This study complements earlier hazardous fuels research in the southeastern USA, and indicates that succession, disturbance, site quality and decomposition interact with forest management practices to create variable spatial and temporal conditions. The inclusion of additional land use, disturbance history, and soil-topographic variables coupled to improved sampling methods may increase precision and subsequent fuel mapping.

  19. Tree Mortality following Prescribed Fire and a Storm Surge Event in Slash Pine ( Pinus elliottii var. densa ) Forests in the Florida Keys, USA

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Sah, Jay P.; Ross, Michael S.; Snyder, James R.; Ogurcak, Danielle E.

    2010-01-01

    In fire-dependent forests, managers are interested in predicting the consequences of prescribed burning on postfire tree mortality. We examined the effects of prescribed fire on tree mortality in Florida Keys pine forests, using a factorial design with understory type, season, and year of burn as factors. We also used logistic regression to model the effects of burn season, fire severity, and tree dimensions on individual tree mortality. Despite limited statistical power due to problems in carrying out the full suite of planned experimental burns, associations with tree and fire variables were observed. Post-fire pine tree mortality was negatively correlated withmore » tree size and positively correlated with char height and percent crown scorch. Unlike post-fire mortality, tree mortality associated with storm surge from Hurricane Wilma was greater in the large size classes. Due to their influence on population structure and fuel dynamics, the size-selective mortality patterns following fire and storm surge have practical importance for using fire as a management tool in Florida Keys pinelands in the future, particularly when the threats to their continued existence from tropical storms and sea level rise are expected to increase.« less

  20. Tree Mortality following Prescribed Fire and a Storm Surge Event in Slash Pine (Pinus elliottiivar.densa) Forests in the Florida Keys, USA

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Sah, Jay P.; Ross, Michael S.; Snyder, James R.; Ogurcak, Danielle E.

    2010-01-01

    In fire-dependent forests, managers are interested in predicting the consequences of prescribed burning on postfire tree mortality. We examined the effects of prescribed fire on tree mortality in Florida Keys pine forests, using a factorial design with understory type, season, and year of burn as factors. We also used logistic regression to model the effects of burn season, fire severity, and tree dimensions on individual tree mortality. Despite limited statistical power due to problems in carrying out the full suite of planned experimental burns, associations with tree and fire variables were observed. Post-fire pine tree mortality was negatively correlated withmoretree size and positively correlated with char height and percent crown scorch. Unlike post-fire mortality, tree mortality associated with storm surge from Hurricane Wilma was greater in the large size classes. Due to their influence on population structure and fuel dynamics, the size-selective mortality patterns following fire and storm surge have practical importance for using fire as a management tool in Florida Keys pinelands in the future, particularly when the threats to their continued existence from tropical storms and sea level rise are expected to increase.less

  1. SF 2050P (rev. 795)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    F SF 2050-P# (12-2000) Supersedes (7-96) issue UCI Sandia National Laboratories REPORT OF OCCUPATIONAL INJURY/ILLNESS (Based on the OSHA definitions and reqirements which may or may not be consistent with various state compensation laws) NOTICE OF ACCIDENT (Pursant to Chapter 52, NMSA 1978 section 52-1-29) FOR MEDICAL USE ONLY Date received in Medical Case No. Date received in Safety Name(Last, First, MI) Org. Mail Stop Sex Date of Birth Age Social Security Number Date of Incident Incident Day

  2. RPP-PLAN-54964, Rev.

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    rate was linear from late 1995 until around 2000 to 2002 when the increase rate began to slow. From 2004 until 2006 or 2007 the tank liquid level appeared essentially constant...

  3. Winter 2013 Newsletter Rev2

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    second panel that Mr. Phelps has been asked to sit will be moderated by Los Alamos National Laboratory. The Panel will be talking about management of fires, with focus on the Las Conchas fire and its effect on getting Transuranic waste re- moved from Material Disposal Area G. The panel will cover the Cerro Grande fire however with less emphasis than that of the more recent fire. Mr. Doug Sayre will also be in attendance at the con- ference to represent the NNMCAB. Both Mr. Sayre and Mr. Phelps

  4. ARAM-CI Rev. 1

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    2008-07-30

    ARAM-CI provides the basic RAM framework process for conducting a security risk analysis (risk assessment and risk management) for different critical infrastructures. The user works through a step-by-step process which includes screening, facility characterization, identification of potential targets, detemine consequences, identify and characterize threat, conduct a vulnerability assessment, and detemining a relative risk. The ARAM-CI tool also allows the user address risk reduction measrues by developing upgrade packages and considering possible impacts.

  5. IntDataRevs.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Interim Data Changes in the Short-term Energy Outlook Data System Related to Electric Power Sector and Natural Gas Demand Data Revisions Beginning with the December 2002 issue of EIA's Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO), electricity generation and related fuel consumption totals will be presented on a basis that is consistent with the definitions and aggregates used in the 2001 edition of EIA's Annual Energy Review (AER). Particularly affected by these changes are the demand and balancing item

  6. Parliamentary Procedure_Rev.0

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    necessary if a member's fundamen- tal rights are being reduced or taken away. Silence is regarded as consent. Meeting Structure The following outlines the structure of a...

  7. RomanowiczFrenchRev.pptx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Deep mantle Ocean Hawaii Marquesas Tahiti Samoa Pitcairn Macdonald Hotspot volcanic ... imaging from global to regional scales Current Focus: Imaging based on numerical ...

  8. ETATP12rev0.PDF

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    E T T A A - - T T P P 0 0 1 1 2 2 R R e e v v i i s s i i o o n n 0 0 E E f f f f e e c c t t i i v v e e J J u u l l y y 1 1 , , 1 1 9 9 9 9 7 7 E E v v a a l l u u a a t t i i o o n n o o f f E E l l e e c c t t r r i i c c V V e e h h i i c c l l e e O O n n - - B B o o a a r r d d B B a a t t t t e e r r y y E E n n e e r r g g y y M M a a n n a a g g e e m m e e n n t t S S y y s s t t e e m m ( ( s s ) ) [ [ B B E E M M S S ] ] P Pr re ep pa ar re ed d b by y E E l l e e c c t t r r i i c

  9. Fall 2013 Newsletter Rev2

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ew Mexico Environment Department Secretary Ryan Flynn attended the Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board's Sep- tember Combined Committee Meeting. Secretary Flynn dis- cussed the success of the Framework Agree- ment and the 3706 Campaign, noting that while the projects are not yet complete he was pleased with the results thus far. One of these successes being the record number of shipments (230) to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in 2012. During his talk Secretary Flynn addressed the

  10. Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 447: Project Shoal Area, Subsurface, Nevada, Rev. No.: 3 with Errata Sheet

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Tim Echelard

    2006-03-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan (CADD/CAP) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 447, Project Shoal Area (PSA)-Subsurface, Nevada, in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (FFACO) (1996). Corrective Action Unit 447 is located in the Sand Springs Mountains in Churchill County, Nevada, approximately 48 kilometers (30 miles) southeast of Fallon, Nevada. The CADD/CAP combines the decision document (CADD) with the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) and provides or references the specific information necessary to recommend corrective actions for CAU 447, as provided in the FFACO. Corrective Action Unit 447 consists of two corrective action sites (CASs): CAS 57-49-01, Emplacement Shaft, and CAS 57-57-001, Cavity. The emplacement shaft (CAS-57-49-01) was backfilled and plugged in 1996 and will not be evaluated further. The purpose of the CADD portion of the document (Section 1.0 to Section 4.0) is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for the subsurface at PSA. To achieve this, the following tasks were required: (1) Develop corrective action objectives. (2) Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria. (3) Develop corrective action alternatives. (4) Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of the corrective action alternatives in relation to the corrective action objectives and screening criteria. (5) Recommend a preferred corrective action alternative for the subsurface at PSA. The original Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) for the PSA was approved in September 1996 and described a plan to drill and test four characterization wells, followed by flow and transport modeling (DOE/NV, 1996). The resultant drilling is described in a data report (DOE/NV, 1998e) and the data analysis and modeling in an interim modeling report (Pohll et al., 1998). After considering the results of the modeling effort, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) determined that the degree of uncertainty in transport predictions for PSA remained unacceptably large. As a result, a second CAIP was developed by DOE and approved by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) in December 1998 (DOE/NV, 1998a). This plan prescribed a rigorous analysis of uncertainty in the Shoal model and quantification of methods of reducing uncertainty through data collection. This analysis is termed a Data Decision Analysis (Pohll et al., 1999a) and formed the basis for a second major characterization effort at PSA (Pohll et al., 1999b). The details for this second field effort are presented in an Addendum to the CAIP, which was approved by NDEP in April 1999 (DOE/NV, 1999a). Four additional characterization wells were drilled at PSA during summer and fall of 1999; details of the drilling and well installation are in IT Corporation (2000), with testing reported in Mihevc et al. (2000). A key component of the second field program was a tracer test between two of the new wells (Carroll et al., 2000; Reimus et al., 2003). Based on the potential exposure pathways, two corrective action objectives were identified for CAU 447: Prevent or mitigate exposure to groundwater contaminants of concern at concentrations exceeding regulatory maximum contaminant levels or risk-based levels; and Reduce the risk to human health and the environment to the extent practicable. Based on the review of existing data, the results of the modeling, future use, and current operations at PSA, the following alternatives have been developed for consideration at CAU 447: Alternative 1--No Further Action; Alternative 2--Proof-of-Concept and Monitoring with Institutional Controls; and Alternative 3--Contaminant Control. The corrective action alternatives were evaluated based on the approach outlined in the ''Focused Evaluation of Selected Remedial Alternatives for the Underground Test Area'' (DOE/NV, 1998b). Each alternative was assessed against nine evaluation criteria. These criteria include overall protection of human health and the environment;

  11. Response to 'Comment on 'Elastic incoherent neutron scattering operating by varying instrumental energy resolution: Principle, simulations, and experiments of the resolution elastic neutron scattering (RENS)'' [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 107101 (2012)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Magazu, Salvatore; Migliardo, Federica; Benedetto, Antonio [Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita di Messina, C.da Papardo n Degree-Sign 31, P.O. Box 55, Vill. S. Agata 98166 Messina (Italy)

    2012-10-15

    Recently [S. Magazu et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 105115 (2011)] we have proposed a new method for characterizing, by neutron scattering, the dynamical properties of complex material systems, such as, the ones of interest in the biophysical field. This approach called Resolution Elastic Neutron Scattering, in short RENS, is based on the detection of the elastically scattered neutron intensity as a function of the instrumental energy resolution. By experimental, theoretical, and numerical findings, we have pointed out that an inflection point occurs in the elastic intensity when the system relaxation time approaches the instrumental energy resolution time. This approach, differently from quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS), gives the chance to evaluate the system relaxation times without using pre-defined models that can be wrong and/or misleading. Here, we reply to a Comment on the above-mentioned main paper in which Wuttke proposes a different approach to evaluate the above-mentioned inflection point; on this regard, it should be noticed that the existence of the inflection point, which is the main topic of our work, is not questioned and that the approach proposed by Wuttke in the Comment, although valid for a class of dynamical processes, is not applicable when different and distinct processes occur simultaneously at different time scale.

  12. Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ) Process Rev

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... (amount, form, confinement, controls), energy sources and other significant hazards. ... procedure change do not introduce any energy sources to the WCG, and do not adversely ...

  13. Abengoa-Tilley RevD

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Innovative Technology Solutions for Sustainability ABENGOA SOLAR S S S Su u u un n n nS ... Innovative technology solutions for sustainability ABENGOA SOLAR Project Details Title: ...

  14. TTR-DOENV--1056REV1.indd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    History H igh in the Great Basin desert, midway between Reno and Las Vegas, Nevada, the Tonopah Test Range lies nestled amongst the Cactus and Kawich mountains. The Tonopah Test Range encompasses 525 square miles within the boundaries of the Nevada Test and Training Range, which is controlled by the U.S. Air Force. In the 1950s, fi eld testing managers from Sandia National Laboratories were attracted to the Tonopah Test Range for many reasons. One of these factors is that the hidden valley

  15. CH-TRUCON Rev. 21, January 2008

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... The titanium tritides (TiT 2 , TiHT, and TiDT) are very stable compounds that are stable ... or tritium until the temperature of the metal has been raised to over 400EC. Therefore, ...

  16. Microsoft Word - TBrpt902rev1.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    for fresh water in many regions of the world has already outstripped supply. Severe water-related stress due to pollution, inadequate supply, and lack of coordinated...

  17. 3REV2004DOEFAIR.xls

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 Commercial and Inherently Governmental FTE Inventory Worksheet Seq. No. Agy_Bur Abbreviation State City Country Total FTEs Activity Fct Code Status Reason First Year On Inventory Reserve Reserve Reserve Reserve 1600 019-60 AB DC Washington US 1 Y000 C B 1999 1601 019-60 AB DC Washington US 0 Y815 C B 2003 1602 019-60 AB DC Washington US 1 Y815 C A 1999 1603 019-60 AB DC Washington US 1 Y815 C A 2002 7395 019-60 AB DC Washington US 1 Y210 I 1999 7396 019-60 AB DC Washington US 1 Y210 I 1999

  18. Microsoft Word - 99-2194, Rev. 8

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (e.g., the environmental monitoring procedures of the WP 02-EM series). Packaging and Shipping of Samples Off-Site Environmental samples sent off-site for analysis are packaged...

  19. A-6005-441 (REV 0)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    at the DOE Richland Operations Office is preferred. The contract shall ensure that these duties are performed in a competent, professional manner that meets established milestones...

  20. OE Report_rev0420.indd

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ......... 1 1.0. Introduction ......mismatch strain and the expulsion of dislocations that are characteristic of ...

  1. A-6005-815i (REV 2)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    and title that requires a clarification, interpretation, or guidance. 4. Initiated By: Name of requestor(s). CompanyOrganization: Requesting company or organization. Date: Date...

  2. DOE-CX-00068-Rev2.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  3. DOE-CX-00069-Rev2.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  4. DOE-CX-00070-Rev2.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  5. DOE-CX-00071-Rev2.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  6. DOE-CX-00072-Rev2.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  7. DOE-CX-00073, Rev 1.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  8. DOE-CX-00088-Rev1.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  9. EMOverview-DOENV--1058 REV3.indd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Characterization a s a result of historic underground nuclear testing, some of the groundwater beneath the NNSS is contaminated. At this time, there is no proven, cost-effective technology that removes deep, extensive contamination from complex geology. Therefore, the NNSS is forecasting the location, potential direction and fl ow of contaminants. This is accomplished through strategically- placed well drilling and extensive sampling which provides data for computer models. All this information

  10. Elements of doing work at SSRL (rev

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Outline for doing work at SSRL Goals: 1. Work effectively, efficiently and safely 2. Compliance with DOE Directives as stated in on ES&H ISEMS web site: http://www-group.slac.stanford.edu/esh/general/isems/ 3. Compliance with SLAC operating directives as found on the SSRL safety web page http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/safety/index.html, e.g., AHAs, JHAMs, Work Authorizations, and Guidelines for Operations. Methods: 1. Safety process: practice 5 core functions; follow JHAMs, safety

  11. FFACO-DOENV--964 Rev2.indd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    T R O D U C T I O N T h is F e d e ra l F a c il it y A g re e m e n t a n d C o n se n t O rd e r (A g re e m e n t) is m a d e a n d e n te re d in to b y a n d a m o n g th e S ta te o f N e v a d a , a c ti n g b y a n d th ro u g h th e D e p a rt m e n t o f C o n se rv a ti o n a n d N a tu ra l R e so u rc e s, D iv is io n o f E n v ir o n m e n ta l P ro te c ti o n (N D E P ), th e U n it e d S ta te s D e p a rt m e n t o f E n e rg y (D O E ), a n d th e U n it e d S ta te s D e p a

  12. DOE_CX-00032_Rev1.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  13. DOE_CX-00064_Rev1.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  14. DOE_CX-00085-Rev-1.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  15. Form 540.1-2_REV A_

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY APPLICATION/PROPOSAL COVER SHEET Note: move the cursor over a block and instructions for it will be displayed in a pop-up box Solicitation Number: Project Title: Topic Area/ Program Area of Interest: Organization: Department, Division or Unit: Organization Type: specify if other: DUNS Number: Project Duration (months): U.S. Congressional District of Organization: County of Organization: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) PI Name {Prefix, First, Middle, Last, Suffix}: PI Phone: ext.

  16. Form W-9 (Rev. December 2014)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification Give Form to the requester. Do not send to the IRS. Print or type See Specific Instructions on page 2. 1 Name (as shown on your income tax return). Name is required on this line; do not leave this line blank. 2 Business name/disregarded entity name, if different from above 3 Check appropriate box for federal tax classification; check only one of the following seven boxes:

  17. Microsoft Word - 05-3318, Rev. 5

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    SSP is integrated into the goal-setting process. Section 4.13 - edited WIPP System language to clarify how correctivepreventive actions are addressed by CBFO and NWP. Added...

  18. D0208002Rev1print.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Fact Sheet Public Comment U.S. Department of Energy - Washington State Department of Ecology - U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency 300 Are a 10 0- B,C 1 00- KW & KE 1 00- N 1 00-...

  19. ICDP Complex Groundwater Monitoring Plan REV 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cahn, L. S.

    2007-08-09

    This Groundwater Monitoring Plan, along with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for Waste Area Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and Removal Actions, constitutes the sampling and analysis plan for groundwater and perched water monitoring at the Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF). A detection monitoring system was installed in the Snake River Plan Aquifer to comply with substantive requirements of "Releases from Solid Waste Management Units" of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. This detection monitoring wells constructed in the Snake River Plain Aquifer.

  20. Form W-9 (Rev. October 2007)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    use the appropriate Form W-8 (see Publication 515, Withholding of Tax on Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Entities). The U.S. grantor or other owner of a grantor trust and not...

  1. Microsoft Word - Highlights rev.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9 1 April 2009 Short-Term Energy and Summer Fuels Outlook April 14, 2009 Release Highlights The price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil averaged $100 per barrel in 2008. The global economic slowdown is projected to reduce the average price to $53 per barrel this year. Assuming an economic recovery next year, WTI prices are expected to average $63 in 2010. Regular-grade gasoline prices have increased to more than $2 per gallon, rising slowly but steadily since the beginning of the year

  2. Form W-9 (Rev. December 2011)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification Give Form to the requester. Do not send to the IRS. Print or...

  3. Form W-9 (Rev. December 2014)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification Give Form to the requester. Do not send to the IRS. Print or...

  4. GJO-99-112-TAR Rev.

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    xiii Please e-mail lm.records@lm.doe.gov to request the appendices or plates. Appendices--will be provided upon request. Appendix A. Lithologic and Monitor Well Completion Logs ................................................. A-1 Appendix B. Surface Water Analytical Results....................................................................... B-1 Appendix C. Ground Water Analytical Results....................................................................... C-1 Appendix D. Flow and

  5. Elements of doing work at SSRL (rev

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    work authorization processes given in http:www- ssrl.slac.stanford.edusafetyindex.html. 5. Ensure procedures are up to date before use. Resources: 1. SSRL safety...

  6. OE Report_rev0420.indd

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Solid-State Semiconductor Power Electronics ........................................................................................... 3 1.2. The

  7. ZERH Arch Designer PA rev (2)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Zero Energy Ready Home(tm) ARCHITECT / DESIGNER PARTNER AGREEMENT Contents Instructions for Partnering with U.S. Department of Energy.................................................................. 2 U.S. Department of Energy Zero Energy Ready Home Terms of the Agreement................................. 3 General terms and commitments made between DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Program and Architect/Designer Partners

  8. GJO-99-112-TAR Rev.

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    xiii Appendices--will be provided upon request. Click Don Metzler or Audrey Berry to request. Appendix A. Lithologic and Monitor Well Completion Logs ................................................. A-1 Appendix B. Surface Water Analytical Results....................................................................... B-1 Appendix C. Ground Water Analytical Results....................................................................... C-1 Appendix D. Flow and Contaminant Transport

  9. 103406_EEREactivitybook_spanish(rev).indd

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    prende la energía limpia ponte en onda L i b re to d e a c t iv idade s e d u c at iva s s o b re ener g ía ponte en onda prende la energía limpia TODOS NECESITAN POTENCIA. Sin embargo, algunas formas de generar y usar energía pueden causar grandes efectos en el medio ambiente. Este Libreto de actividades educativas sobre energía presenta un número de consejos y pistas sobre cómo tomar decisiones inteligentes, ahorrar dinero, y reducir nuestro impacto en el medio ambiente. Antes de que

  10. Microsoft Word - MP 10 3 Rev 7

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    http://bellview/cbfo/CBFO-Procedures.html CBFO Quality Assurance Director CBFO Form 4.1-1 U. S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE Effective: 30 December 2010 SUBJECT: AUDITS Manager, Carlsbad Field Office: //signature on file// Date: 12/07/2010 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to define the process, responsibilities, and controls for planning and conducting independent announced and unannounced audits by the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO). 2.0 SCOPE This

  11. DOE/NV--209-REV15

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 800.553.6847 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: orders@ntis.fedworld.gov Online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov.bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 Phone: 865.576.8401 Fax: 865.576.5728 Email: reports@adonis.osti.gov

  12. TRU-DOENV--787Rev3.indd

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Background T ransuranic radioactive waste is one of several types of waste handled by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Offi ce at the Nevada Test Site. Transuranic waste contains man-made radioactive elements heavier than uranium, such as plutonium, hence the name "trans" or "beyond" uranium. Most of the transuranic waste managed at the Nevada Test Site was generated as part of a nuclear weapons research and development

  13. CX-00035 _Prescribed_burning.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  14. Prescribed_Burn_2010-cx-00021.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  15. Summary Schedule_Rev.3_TRupdate_(10-24-14) Rev 2 JC.xlsx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    development Decontamination testing - water spray and fixative NMED ReviewApproval PCNPMR for IVS NMED - Submit PMR to Address 260,000 scfm RAA NEPA - Perform IVS...

  16. FINAL REPORT MELTER TESTS WITH AZ-101 HLW SIMULANT USING A DURAMELTER 100 VITRIFICATION SYSTEM VSL-01R10N0-1 REV 1 2/25/02

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    KRUGER AA; MATLACK KS; KOT WK; PEGG IL

    2011-12-29

    This report provides data, analyses, and conclusions from a series of tests that were conducted at the Vitreous State Laboratory of The Catholic of America (VSL) to determine the processing rates that are achievable with AZ-101 HLW simulants and corresponding melter feeds on a DuraMelter 100 (DM100) vitrification system. One of the most critical pieces of information in determining the required size of the RPP-WTP HLW melter is the specific glass production rate in terms of the mass of glass that can be produced per unit area of melt surface per unit time. The specific glass production rate together with the waste loading (essentially, the ratio of waste-in to glass-out, which is determined from glass formulation activities) determines the melt area that is needed to achieve a given waste processing rate with due allowance for system availability. Tests conducted during Part B1 (VSL-00R2590-2) on the DM1000 vitrification system installed at the Vitreous State Laboratory of The Catholic University of America showed that, without the use of bubblers, glass production rates with AZ-101 and C-106/AY-102 simulants were significantly lower than the Project design basis rate of 0.4 MT/m{sup 2}/d. Conversely, three-fold increases over the design basis rate were demonstrated with the use of bubblers. Furthermore, an un-bubbled control test using a replica of the melter feed used in cold commissioning tests at West Valley reproduced the rates that were observed with that feed on the WVDP production melter. More recent tests conducted on the DM1200 system, which more closely represents the present RPP-WTP design, are in general agreement with these earlier results. Screening tests conducted on the DM10 system have provided good indications of the larger-scale processing rates with bubblers (for both HL W and LAW feeds) but significantly overestimated the DM1000 un-bubbled rate observed for C-106/AY-102 melter feeds. This behavior is believed to be a consequence of the role of heat transfer in rate attainment and the much greater role of wall effects in heat transfer when the melt pool is not agitated. The DM100 melter used for the present tests has a surface area of 0.108 m{sup 2}, which is approximately 5 times larger than that of the DM10 (0.021 m{sup 2}) and approximately 11 times smaller than that of the DM1000 (1.2 m{sup 2}) (the DM1000 has since been replaced by a pilot-scale prototypical HLW melter, designated the DM1200, which has the same surface area as the DM1000). Testing on smaller melters is the most economical method for obtaining data over a wide range of operating conditions (particularly at extremes) and for guiding the more expensive tests that are performed at pilot-scale. Thus, one objective of these tests was to determine whether the DM100 melters are sufficiently large to reproduce the un-bubbled melt rates observed at the DM1000 scale, or to determine the extent of any off-set. DM100-scale tests can then be used to screen feed chemistry variations that may serve to increase the un-bubbled production rates prior to confirmation at pilot scale. Finally, extensive characterization data obtained on simulated HLW melter feeds formed from various glass forming additives indicated that there may be advantages in terms of feed rheology and stability to the replacement of some of the hydroxides by carbonates. A further objective of the present tests was therefore to identify any deleterious processing effects of such a change before adopting the carbonate feed as the baseline. Data from the WVDP melter using acidified (nitrated) feeds, and without bubbling, showed productions rates that are higher than those observed with the alkaline RPP feeds at the VSL. Therefore, the effect of feed acidification on production rate also was investigated. This work was performed under Test Specification, 'TSP-W375-00-00019, Rev 0, 'HLW-DM10 and DM100 Melter Tests' dated November 13, 2000 and the corresponding Test Plan. It should be noted, however, that the RPP-WTP Project directed a series of changes to the Test Plan as the result

  17. Microsoft Word - Cleanline final report Rev 3.doc

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    S Y S T E M I M P A C T S T U D Y MAR 2014 (REVISION 3) CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS S H E L B Y - 3 5 0 0 M W M E M P H I S L I G H T , G A S & W A T E R D I V I S I O N P L A N N I N G & S Y S T E M S E N G I N E E R I N G ( 9 0 1 ) 5 2 8 - 4 2 9 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS C L E A N L I N E S Y S T E M I M PA C T S T U DY R E V. 3 Signatures 1 Executive Summary 2 Acknowledgements 3 Process 3 Definition of System Impact 4 Shelby 5 Methodology 6 Results 7 Alternatives Considered 14 Supporting

  18. Microsoft PowerPoint - WV SGIP 101810 rev1.pptx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Virginia Smart Grid Implementation Plan - Roadmap Framework ... by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE AC26 ... Business 5 Consumer Conservation 20 Operational Savings ...

  19. Microsoft Word - DPP-LHCD-2007-Rev.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CQL3D Fokker Planck Code," Proc. IAEA Tech. Comm. Meeting on Simulation and Modeling of Thermonuclear Plasmas, Montreal, Canada, 1992. 4 J. C. Wright et al., Nucl. Fusion 45,...

  20. AcqGuide35pt1rev2.doc

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    reports, and any other forms of research results relating thereto, including software, available electronically to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and...

  1. RPM 2.05. Employee Relations (Rev. 06/14)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    of the HR Centers, with the support of the Labor Employee Relations (LER) Unit of the Human Resources Department, are qualified to provide assistance resolving these problems....

  2. Fuel Summary Report: Shippingport Light Water Breeder Reactor - Rev. 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Olson, Gail Lynn; Mc Cardell, Richard Keith; Illum, Douglas Brent

    2002-09-01

    The Shippingport Light Water Breeder Reactor (LWBR) was developed by Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory to demonstrate the potential of a water-cooled, thorium oxide fuel cycle breeder reactor. The LWBR core operated from 1977-82 without major incident. The fuel and fuel components suffered minimal damage during operation, and the reactor testing was deemed successful. Extensive destructive and nondestructive postirradiation examinations confirmed that the fuel was in good condition with minimal amounts of cladding deformities and fuel pellet cracks. Fuel was placed in wet storage upon arrival at the Expended Core Facility, then dried and sent to the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center for underground dry storage. It is likely that the fuel remains in good condition at its current underground dry storage location at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center. Reports show no indication of damage to the core associated with shipping, loading, or storage.

  3. Microsoft Word - RPP-PLAN-47325 Rev 0.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Regulations CMS IP Corrective Measures Study Implementation Plan DOE U.S. Department of Energy FR Federal Register HFFACO Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order HLW...

  4. QP-10.1 Audits Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  5. QP-10.2 Independent Assessments Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  6. QP-3.3 Lessons Learned Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  7. QP-4.1 Document Control Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  8. QP-4.2 Document Review Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  9. QP-4.3 Records Management Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  10. QP-5.3 Stop Work Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  11. QP-7.1 Supplier Qualification Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  12. QP-7.2 Approved Suppliers List Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  13. Memo Distributing EM-QA-001 Rev 1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  14. Trident schedule FY16 -- rev 11-10-15.xlsx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Schedule FY 2015-16 11/10/2015 28-Sep Material dynamics (gas gun) / Loomis na 4 5-Oct 4 12-Oct 3 19-Oct maintenance 4 26-Oct AWE -- DTRA / Davis - Sibley South ns 4 2-Nov maintenance 4 9-Nov West target chamber upgrades 3 16-Nov 4 23-Nov 2 30-Nov 4 7-Dec Palaniyappan -- Weibel Instability in Collisionless Shocks West ps 4 14-Dec 4 21-Dec Christmas (3 day week) 3 Christmas Break 28-Dec Christmas Break 0 Christmas Break 4-Jan maintenance 4 11-Jan Zylstra -- Heavy ion stopping West ps-ns 4 18-Jan 3

  15. Microsoft Word - RPP-PLAN-47559 Rev 0.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Pipelines in Waste Management Area C (2 sheets) Date Waste Type a Waste Discharged (gal) Event Description References b 5-1966 PUREX CWP2 No estimate "A leak in the PUREX coating...

  16. Microsoft Word - TDG Analysis Rev 2 APR 2011.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    BPA and Fish Passage Center study effects of changing total dissolved gas standards April 2011 As renewable energy expands in the Northwest, BPA and its fellow operators of the...

  17. Microsoft Word - S01091_LTSMP_Spanish REV.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    sobre la historia de la AEE, ganadores del premio Nbel, cientficos, el sistema solar, y viajes por el espacio. El cuarto de control del reactor sigue intacto y, aunque...

  18. WMOverview-DOENV--Rev8--Comments.indd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NNSS F or decades, the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) has served as a vital waste disposal resource in the nation-wide cleanup of former nuclear research and testing facilities. State-of-the-art waste management sites at the NNSS offer a safe, permanent disposal option for U.S. Department of Energy/U.S. Department of Defense facilities generating cleanup-related radioactive waste. LLW and MLLW W aste management operations at the NNSS focus on the disposal of low- level (LLW) and mixed

  19. SoS-ASI 2016 Flyer_rev01

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Science of Signatures Advanced Studies Institute April 18 - May 6, 2016 A professional development opportunity for advanced Ph.D. students and postdocs interested in learning skills needed for research program development at National Laboratories/Academia. Purpose: To invite a multi- disciplinary group of advanced, highly accomplished Ph.D. students and post-doctoral researchers from around the country to come to Los Alamos National Laboratory for an opportunity to generate novel, creative

  20. Property:Oth rev (thousand $) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Illinois Pub Serv Co (Illinois) EIA Revenue and Sales - September 2008 + 70 + City of Detroit (Michigan) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 55 + City of Detroit (Michigan) EIA...

  1. 2015_PEMP_Rev.0_-_Signed.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  2. Trident schedule FY16 -- rev 11-10-15.xlsx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Schedule FY 2015-16 11102015 28-Sep Material dynamics (gas gun) Loomis na 4 5-Oct 4 12-Oct 3 19-Oct maintenance 4 26-Oct AWE -- DTRA Davis - Sibley South ns 4 2-Nov ...

  3. Albany Center map_rev36-10

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Bro adw ay Stre et Lib ert y Str ee t Queen Avenue N S1 S2 S3 Locked Gate Locked Gate Locked Gate Locked Gate Locked Gate Locked Gate Walk Gate (locked) Walk Gate (locked) Walk Gate (locked) 0 200 Scale in feet 1 40 33 31 30 29 28 Trailer 2 Trailer 1 27 26 25 23 24 22 20 21 19 18 36 35 37 38 39 34 17 14,15,16 13 7 8 9 10 11 6 12 5 4 2 32 VACANT FEDERAL PROPERTY S4 Gas Sheds Covered Dock Main Gate Security Guard Emergency Gate (Automatic) Locked Gate Locked Gate Walk Gate (locked) Scrap Metal

  4. High-Speed Pipeline Revs Up Biomass Analysis (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    2011-02-01

    Researchers at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) have developed a new biomass evaluation process that opens up research avenues into understanding and manipulating biomass recalcitrance.

  5. ADVANTG An Automated Variance Reduction Parameter Generator, Rev. 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mosher, Scott W.; Johnson, Seth R.; Bevill, Aaron M.; Ibrahim, Ahmad M.; Daily, Charles R.; Evans, Thomas M.; Wagner, John C.; Johnson, Jeffrey O.; Grove, Robert E.

    2015-08-01

    The primary objective of ADVANTG is to reduce both the user effort and the computational time required to obtain accurate and precise tally estimates across a broad range of challenging transport applications. ADVANTG has been applied to simulations of real-world radiation shielding, detection, and neutron activation problems. Examples of shielding applications include material damage and dose rate analyses of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Spallation Neutron Source and High Flux Isotope Reactor (Risner and Blakeman 2013) and the ITER Tokamak (Ibrahim et al. 2011). ADVANTG has been applied to a suite of radiation detection, safeguards, and special nuclear material movement detection test problems (Shaver et al. 2011). ADVANTG has also been used in the prediction of activation rates within light water reactor facilities (Pantelias and Mosher 2013). In these projects, ADVANTG was demonstrated to significantly increase the tally figure of merit (FOM) relative to an analog MCNP simulation. The ADVANTG-generated parameters were also shown to be more effective than manually generated geometry splitting parameters.

  6. Microsoft Word - Section G _Rev 01-23-2006_.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    G Contract No. DE-AC06-05RL14655 M014 G-i PART I - THE SCHEDULE SECTION G CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA TABLE OF CONTENTS G.1 CORRESPONDENCE PROCEDURES......

  7. Microsoft Word - Oral Thesis memo_Rev_2012-1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    MEMORANDUM TO: Faculty, Research Staff, and Graduate Students FROM: Shalom Shlomo DATE: October 11, 2012 RE: Student Oral Thesis Progress Presentations I have scheduled the oral presentations of the graduate students listed below. These students are asked to submit their written 1-2 page thesis progress report by e-mail to me and to Leslie Speikes at least two weeks prior to the presentation. The report, written in consultation with the thesis advisor, should describe the proposed investigation,

  8. Microsoft Word - HH1Paper_HJ_REV0.doc

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... In their solution, the porous blocks are represented by spheres that have a finite capacity to store a contaminant. Baker (1982) investigated tracer transport in a system of ...

  9. HNF-SD-WM-TI-740_Rev_0.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  10. Microsoft Word - EM Roadmap Rev 0 Dec 17 2010.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Create an EM Continuous Improvement Program that incorporates all lessons learned from previous oversight reports to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of EM...

  11. Microsoft Word - NSDBs for LA REV 003 FINAL.doc

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    QA: QA 000-30R-MGR0-00400-000-003 September 2005 Nuclear Safety Design Bases for License Application Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Office of Repository Development 1551 Hillshire Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89134-6321 Prepared by: Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC 1180 Town Center Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Under Contract Number DE-AC28-01RW12101 ENG.20050929.0005 Nuclear Safety Design Bases for License Application 000-30R-MGR0-00400-000-003 ii

  12. Albany Center map_rev36-10

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Bro adw ay Stre et Lib ert y Str ee t Queen Avenue N S1 S2 S3 Locked Gate Locked Gate Locked Gate Locked Gate Locked Gate Locked Gate Walk Gate (locked) Walk Gate (locked) Walk...

  13. Reference Model 2: %22Rev 0%22 Rotor Design.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Barone, Matthew F.; Berg, Jonathan Charles; Griffith, Daniel

    2011-12-01

    The preliminary design for a three-bladed cross-flow rotor for a reference marine hydrokinetic turbine is presented. A rotor performance design code is described, along with modifications to the code to allow prediction of blade support strut drag as well as interference between two counter-rotating rotors. The rotor is designed to operate in a reference site corresponding to a riverine environment. Basic rotor performance and rigid-body loads calculations are performed to size the rotor elements and select the operating speed range. The preliminary design is verified with a simple finite element model that provides estimates of bending stresses during operation. A concept for joining the blades and support struts is developed and analyzed with a separate finite element analysis. Rotor mass, production costs, and annual energy capture are estimated in order to allow calculations of system cost-of-energy. Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.Pdf.Kit. Copyright 2002-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.Pdf.Kit. Copyright 2002-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd

  14. RegReq-DOENV--631REV2.indd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Regulatory Requirements A ctivities relating to an ongoing Environmental Management campaign at the Nevada National Security Site (formerly the Nevada Test Site) are subject to a number of federal and state regulations. These requirements govern environmental cleanup, emergency response, waste disposal, and other operations. State requirements are in place to address the environmental, economic, and safety concerns of Nevadans; while federal laws ensure sites throughout the U.S. Department of

  15. DOE-CX-00073-Rev2-Routine-Maintenance.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  16. DOE-CX-00129_Rev0_Signed.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  17. Microsoft Word - Gr91-CREEP-RUPTURE-rev.doc

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    VERIFICATION OF ALLOWABLE STRESSES IN ASME SECTION III, SUBSECTION NH FOR GRADE 91 STEEL PART 1: BASE METAL R. W. Swindeman Cromtech Inc Oak Ridge, TN 37830-7856 M. J. Swindeman University of Dayton Research Institute Dayton, OH 45469-0110 B. W. Roberts BW Roberts Consultants Chattanooga, TN 37416 B. E. Thurgood Bpva Engineering San Diego, CA 92131 D. L. Marriott Stress Engineering Services Mason, OH 45040 September, 2007 2 ABSTRACT The database for the creep-rupture of 9Cr-1Mo-V (Grade 91)

  18. Microsoft PowerPoint - NNMCAB Processes and Procedures Rev 4...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) by the Asst. Secretary for Environmental Management Visit the NNMCAB's Website at: www.nnmcab.energy.gov 1 What are Site...

  19. Microsoft Word - EMSSABChairs conferencecall Dec2 FINAL_cab_rev

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    (LTS) point of contact. Ms. O'Conor has a multitude of experience with cleanup issues and previously worked for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department...

  20. Tank 19F Folding Crawler Final Evaluation, Rev. 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nance, T.

    2000-10-25

    The Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to removing millions of gallons of high-level radioactive waste from 51 underground waste storage tanks at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The primary radioactive waste constituents are strontium, plutonium,and cesium. It is recognized that the continued storage of this waste is a risk to the public, workers, and the environment. SRS was the first site in the DOE complex to have emptied and operationally closed a high-level radioactive waste tank. The task of emptying and closing the rest of the tanks will be completed by FY28.

  1. Multi-pack Disposal Concepts for Spent Fuel (Rev. 0)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hadgu, Teklu; Hardin, Ernest; Matteo, Edward N.

    2015-12-01

    At the initiation of the Used Fuel Disposition (UFD) R&D campaign, international geologic disposal programs and past work in the U.S. were surveyed to identify viable disposal concepts for crystalline, clay/shale, and salt host media (Hardin et al., 2012). Concepts for disposal of commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level waste (HLW) from reprocessing are relatively advanced in countries such as Finland, France, and Sweden. The UFD work quickly showed that these international concepts are all “enclosed,” whereby waste packages are emplaced in direct or close contact with natural or engineered materials . Alternative “open” modes (emplacement tunnels are kept open after emplacement for extended ventilation) have been limited to the Yucca Mountain License Application Design (CRWMS M&O, 1999). Thermal analysis showed that, if “enclosed” concepts are constrained by peak package/buffer temperature, waste package capacity is limited to 4 PWR assemblies (or 9-BWR) in all media except salt. This information motivated separate studies: 1) extend the peak temperature tolerance of backfill materials, which is ongoing; and 2) develop small canisters (up to 4-PWR size) that can be grouped in larger multi-pack units for convenience of storage, transportation, and possibly disposal (should the disposal concept permit larger packages). A recent result from the second line of investigation is the Task Order 18 report: Generic Design for Small Standardized Transportation, Aging and Disposal Canister Systems (EnergySolution, 2015). This report identifies disposal concepts for the small canisters (4-PWR size) drawing heavily on previous work, and for the multi-pack (16-PWR or 36-BWR).

  2. Microsoft Word - Annnual_Report_2009Rev1

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Formerly Labeled as Radioactive MaterialWaste Storage Tank Figures 11a and 11b. Basement Level - Survey Locations 50A and 50B Attachment 2 Annual Survey Contamination Survey Forms...

  3. Microsoft Word - HH1Paper_HJ_REV0.doc

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    state solutions for a multiple-fracture system in terms of both Laplace transform and Fourier series representation, this paper offers a more straightforward approach to derive...

  4. DOE-CBFO-11-3470_Rev_0.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  5. HNF-SD-WM-TI-740, Rev. OA

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    MSIN, 4. USQ Required? 5. Date (mark one) and Telephone No. SupleenaLM. J. KUpfer, LMHC, H5-49, IYes X No 81997 Direct Revision Lxi 376-6631 Change ECN U 6. Project...

  6. Microsoft Word - Hg SEIS NNMCAB Member Comments Letter Rev 1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    to be differences in the purity of the incoming mercury. Some of the mercury came from gold mining processes that contained a great number of elemental impurities such as...

  7. UTILITYID","UTILNAME","STATE","YEAR","MONTH","RES_REV (Thousand...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...777,336,5848,273,2722,11152,132923 12876,"Moore Haven City of","FL",91,1,42,517,33,387,0,0...057,389,5676,216,1840,11436,135425 12876,"Moore Haven City of","FL",91,2,48,490,36,333,0,0...

  8. UTILITYID","UTILNAME","STATE","YEAR","MONTH","RES_REV (Thousand...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...207,407,6384,226,2040,11664,144814 12876,"Moore Haven City of","FL",92,1,62,605,41,387,0,0...922,418,6517,215,1828,12187,151292 12876,"Moore Haven City of","FL",92,2,51,515,41,394,0,0...

  9. UTILITYID","UTILNAME","STATE","YEAR","MONTH","RES_REV (Thousand...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...485,353,5254,250,2358,13271,155673 12876,"Moore Haven City of","FL",90,1,71,626,41,340,0,0...848,361,5418,237,2124,11176,131186 12876,"Moore Haven City of","FL",90,2,46,479,39,392,0,0...

  10. Microsoft Word - FY2010 Annual Report REV2

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    453 ANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT FY 2010 Radioactive Waste Shipments to and from the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) June 2011 United States Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Las Vegas, Nevada This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................1 2.0 SUMMARY OF WASTE SHIPMENTS (FY 2010) ..........................................1 2.1 Waste

  11. Microsoft Word - HSW-EIS-Review-Report-Rev-6.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Hanford Solid Waste Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Data Quality, Control and Management Issues January 2006 Hanford Solid Waste Environment Impact Statement (EIS) Data Quality, Control and Management Issues Review Report ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. IV 1.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 REVIEW

  12. Microsoft Word - IEEEFieldDataCollectionPaperRev2.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    FIELD DATA COLLECTION FOR QUANTIFICATION OF RELIABILITY AND AVAILABILITY FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS Elmer Collins, Jeff Mahn, Michael Mundt, Jennifer Granata and Michael Quintana Sandia National Laboratories PO Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87185-1033 ABSTRACT Predicting reliability and availability is a data driven capability of interest to the entire photovoltaic community, from material suppliers to system owners. Sandia National Laboratories is developing a predictive model and a host of

  13. Microsoft Word - MSI Participating Institutions Rev 1 FINAL.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Participating Minority Serving Institutions: Alabama A&M University Allen University Benedict College Central State University Cheyney University Claflin University Clark Atlanta University Denmark Technical College Education Advancement Alliance Fisk University Florida A&M University Florida Memorial University Fort Valley State University Hampton University Hispanic Consortium Howard University Lincoln University Maricopa Community Colleges Morehouse College Morgan State University

  14. Microsoft Word - Section G _Rev 01-23-2006_.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    G Contract No. DE-AC06-05RL14655 M014 G-i PART I - THE SCHEDULE SECTION G CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA TABLE OF CONTENTS G.1 CORRESPONDENCE PROCEDURES.............................................................................................1 G.2 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................................................1 G.3 BILLING INSTRUCTIONS

  15. Microsoft Word - WIPP Update 3_10_14 rev.1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    March 10, 2014 WIPP UPDATE: Planning Continues for Manned Entry PERSONNEL ENTRY OF THE MINE After this weekend's successful probe entry into the Salt Handling and Air Intake Shafts at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, plans to send personnel into the mine to learn the cause of the recent radiation release are being developed and reviewed. WIPP personnel will perform Mine Safety and Health Administration-required inspections of both the Salt Handling and Air Intake Shafts this week. If all of the

  16. Microsoft Word - Columbia Generating Station Electric Rev Bonds...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Tax Reform Act of 1986, as amended (the "1986 Act") and Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "1986 Code"). In the further opinion of Special Tax...

  17. Microsoft PowerPoint - Air Soil Water rev3 - Copy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    SALT PILE SAMPLING RESULTS (dpm/g) (Bq/g) South Face of Salt Pile 3/13/2014 Below MDC Below MDC East Face of Salt Pile 3/13/2014 Below MDC Below MDC West Face of Salt Pile 3/13/2014 Below MDC Below MDC South Ridge of Salt Pile, South of Salt Pile 3/13/2014 Below MDC Below MDC North Ridge of Salt Pile, North of Salt Pile 3/13/2014 Below MDC Below MDC South Face of Salt Pile (Duplicate) 3/13/2014 Below MDC Below MDC MDC = Minimum Detectable Concentration (An analytical laboratory limit below which

  18. Microsoft PowerPoint - January Full Board Rev 2.pptx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Hanford Advisory Board February 9, 2012 Hanford Advisory Board Stacy Charboneau Deputy Manager ORP Activities ORP Activities One System Integrated One System Integrated Project Team Tank retrievals Installation complete on the PT Facility's fifth elevation of concrete walls. concrete walls. Continue large-scale testing for Pretreatment Community outreach Crews installed thermocouples on waste transfer lines to improve temperature monitoring 2 Crews installed a modified sluicer with extended

  19. Microsoft PowerPoint - WV SGIP 101810 rev1.pptx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Virginia Smart Grid Implementation Plan - Roadmap Framework GridWeek 2010 Steve Pullins October 18, 2010, Washington, DC This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE AC26 04NT41817 Number DE-AC26-04NT41817 This presentation was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States g y Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or

  20. Microsoft Word - Draft Option Mod Oct - Dec 2011 rev 1

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    in accordance with the provisions of this Contract. This period includes the transition period of November 2000 through January 31, 2001." d. By revising Part 1- The...

  1. Microsoft Word - S07406_5YrRev

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Community Involvement This page intentionally left blank Public Notice, October 22, 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review September 2011 Doc. No. S07406 Page A-1 Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S07406 September 2011 Page A-2 This page intentionally left blank Notification Letter to EPA and State, September 17, 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review September 2011 Doc. No. S07406

  2. Microsoft Word - S07406_5YrRev

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Inspection Photos and Checklist This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review September 2011 Doc. No. S07406 Page B-1 Photo 1. Burgermeister Spring. Photo 2. Inside Quarry Proper. Photo 3. Southeast drainage. Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S07406 September 2011 Page B-2 Photo 4. Highway D culverts outlet. Photo 5. Culvert under Highway 94. Photo 6. Disposal cell inspection looking south. U.S.

  3. Microsoft Word - S07406_5YrRev

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Response from State Regarding Wells within Special Area 4 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review September 2011 Doc. No. S07406 Page C-1 Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S07406 September 2011 Page C-2 U.S. Department of Energy Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review September 2011 Doc. No. S07406 Page C-3 Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No.

  4. Microsoft Word - S07406_5YrRev

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Interview Forms This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review September 2011 Doc. No. S07406 Page D-1 INTERVIEW RECORD Site Name: Weldon Spring Site EPA ID No.: MO6210022830 Subject: Annual Inspection Time: 9:30 am Date: 10/12/10 Type: x Telephone Visit Other Location of Visit:  Incoming x Outgoing Contact Made By: Name: Terri Uhlmeyer Title: Compliance Manager Organization: SM Stoller, Corp. Individual Contacted: Name:

  5. Microsoft Word - S0130700_Mar 2008Rev June 2008.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NRC Concurrence with Completion of Remedial Action This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site March 2008 Doc. No. S0130700 Page A-3 LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S0130700 March 2008 Page A-4 U.S. Department of Energy LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site March 2008 Doc. No. S0130700 Page A-5 LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No.

  6. Microsoft Word - S0130700_Mar 2008Rev June 2008.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Real Estate Documentation This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site March 2008 Doc. No. S0130700 Page B-3 LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S0130700 March 2008 Page B-4 U.S. Department of Energy LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site March 2008 Doc. No. S0130700 Page B-5 LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S0130700 March 2008 Page B-6

  7. Microsoft Word - S0130700_Mar 2008Rev June 2008.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Inspection Checklist This page intentionally left blank Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance U.S. Department of Energy at Grand Junction, Colorado Office of Legacy Management 2006 INSPECTION CHECKLIST FALLS CITY, TEXAS, UMTRCA TITLE I DISPOSAL SITE Status of Site Inspections Date of This Revision: January 5, 2006 Last Annual Inspection: January 26, 2005 Inspectors: Widdop and Gardner Next Annual Inspection (Planned): January 24, 2006 No. Item Issue Action 1 Protocols Notify Louis McGee (DOE),

  8. Microsoft Word - S0130700_Mar 2008Rev June 2008.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NRC Technical Evaluation Report on Revised LTSP This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site March 2008 Doc. No. S0130700 Page D-3 LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S0130700 March 2008 Page D-4 U.S. Department of Energy LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site March 2008 Doc. No. S0130700 Page D-5 LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No.

  9. Microsoft Word - S0130700_Mar 2008Rev June 2008.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Agency Notification Agreements This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site March 2008 Doc. No. S0130700 Page E-3 LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S0130700 March 2008 Page E-4 U.S. Department of Energy LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site March 2008 Doc. No. S0130700 Page E-5 LTSP for the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S0130700 March 2008

  10. Microsoft Word - S07406_5YrRev

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    United States Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Weldon Spring Site Fourth Five-Year Review September 2011 LMS/WEL/S07406 This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank Five-Year Review Summary Form SITE IDENTIFICATION Site name (from WasteLAN): Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE/Army) EPA ID (from WasteLAN): MO3210090004 Region: 7 State: MO City/County: St. Charles/St. Charles SITE STATUS NPL status: X Final Deleted Other (specify) Remediation status

  11. Microsoft Word - EPS WBS Scope Statement Rev 2.docx

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    activities necessary to provide project management support associated with the M&O's UGTA drilling campaigns and other field support activities. In addition, the contractor will...

  12. UGTA QAP_rev_1_F.book

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    minimum, responsible for the following: * Report information regarding scope, schedules, costs, technical execution, and quality achievement of task order activities to NNSANSO....

  13. Microsoft Word - MSI Participating Institutions Rev 1 FINAL.doc

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Participating Minority Serving Institutions: Alabama A&M University Allen University Benedict College Central State University Cheyney University Claflin University Clark Atlanta University Denmark Technical College Education Advancement Alliance Fisk University Florida A&M University Florida Memorial University Fort Valley State University Hampton University Hispanic Consortium Howard University Lincoln University Maricopa Community Colleges Morehouse College Morgan State University

  14. New DOE-NASCAR Partnership Revs Deployment of Pollution Reducing...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Michael Knotek, Deputy Undersecretary for Science and Energy at the Energy Department, delivers remarks at the NASCAR Green Summit in Chicago, where the DOE-NASCAR MOU was ...

  15. Microsoft PowerPoint - MPI_NERSC_rev2.pptx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    the buffer (array) is available for reuse * Depending on implementation, may wait for a matching receive * MPIRsend - In addition, expects a matching receive to be posted *...

  16. Microsoft Word - M133 Word _rev3_.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2. Paragraph (b), REVISE DOE Orders 221.1 and 221.2 to now be DOE O 221.1A, Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse to the Office of Inspector General, dated April 19, 2008, and DOE O...

  17. FITCH RATES ENERGY NORTHWEST, WA'S ELECTRIC REV RFDG BONDS 'AA...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    debt (4.1 billion). KEY RATING DRIVERS BONNEVILLE'S OBLIGATION SECURES BONDS: The rating on the Energy Northwest bonds reflects the credit quality of Bonneville and its...

  18. TipCard_Front_back_final_rev2.indd

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    helps you understand your purchase. The label has the lumens - or brightness - of the bulb, the estimated operating cost and life, and the color of the light (from warm/yellow, to white, to cool/blue). Energy-saving bulbs come in a wide range of colors. energysavers.gov/lumens Lumens tell you how bright a bulb is. More lumens mean brighter light. When replacing a 60-watt traditional incandescent bulb, look for a new bulb that gives you about 800 lumens. Choose your next light bulb for

  19. Microsoft Word - APP VI, Rev 3 _03-19-20

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nevada Test Area CR Closure Report DoD U.S. Department of Defense DOE U.S. Department of Energy DOEDP U.S. Department of EnergyDefense Program DOEEM U.S. Department of Energy...

  20. Microsoft Word - Second National Report -- Final Rev 30.doc

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... The average American receives approximately 3 Sv (300 ... programs to protect public health and safety from these ... Inspector NRC Inspector Journal 5-Jan-2001 1246B13 ...

  1. NREL: Wind Research - FAST Revs Up with a v8

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Siemens The introduction of a new interface to controls implementation through MATLABSimulink An expansion of floating functionality (nonlinear fluid-impulse hydrodynamic theory...

  2. Microsoft Word - RPP-46459 Rev 1_RLaccepted.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    46459 Revision 1 i Single-Shell Tank Waste Management Area C RCRACERCLA Integration White Paper J. W. Badden Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Date Published July 2010...

  3. SPEAR_09-10_rev_4-2-09.xls

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2008 2009 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct S 1 1 S 2 1 1 2 2 3 M 3 3 1 2 MA 1 4 T 4 2 3 2 AP 3 W 1 3 1 4 1 3 7 4 5 12 MA 6 20 17 17 14 4 5 2 3 1 4 1 2 5 4 2 6 3 1 F...

  4. Microsoft Word - S0130700_Mar 2008Rev June 2008.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Falls City Uranium Mill Tailings Disposal Site Falls City, Texas March 2008 Office of Legacy Management DOE M/1602 2008 - -L Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. DE-AM01-07LM00060 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management U.S. Department of Energy This page intentionally left blank DOE-LM/1602-2008 U.S. Department of Energy Office of

  5. Microsoft Word - RwtFinal2007rev5.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    7 December 2007 DOE HANDBOOK Radiological Worker Training U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1130-2007 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from

  6. Microsoft Word - TEC Participants_Sep_2004rev.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    TEC Participants_Sep_2004.doc 10/28/2004 1 PARTICIPANTS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) TRANSPORTATION EXTERNAL COORDINATION WORKING GROUP (TEC) MEETING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 20-22, 2004 Catherine Anne, Transportation Manager NAC International 3930 East Jones Bridge Road Suite 200 Norcross, Georgia 30092 (678) 328-1343 FAX: (678) 328-1543 canne@nacintl.com Richard Arnold Native American Interactions 1180 N. Town Center Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89144-6363 (702) 339-7200 FAX: (702)

  7. Microsoft Word - DOE Comments-Nov1rev.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Before the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY WASHINGTON, DC Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy ) and Logistical Challenges ) to Smart Grid Implementation ) COMMENTS OF THE CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY AND THE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION: IMPLEMENTING THE FIPS IN THE SMART GRID I. Introduction The Center for Democracy & Technology ("CDT") 1 and the Electronic Frontier Foundation ("EFF") 2 are pleased to file these

  8. Microsoft Word - Draft Combined Committee Agenda for 021214 Rev 3

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    February 12, 2014 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Cities of Gold Conference Center 10-B Cities of Gold Road Pojoaque, NM AGENDA 1. 2:00 p.m. Approval of Agenda 2. 2:03 p.m. Approval of Minutes from January 8, 2014 3. 2:07 p.m. Old Business  Update on WIPP Permit Modification (Hanford Mod)  Review Mercury SEIS NNMCAB Comment Responses 4. 2:25 p.m. New Business 5. 2:35 p.m. Update from Executive Committee - Carlos Valdez, Chair  LANL Public Reading Room (Available Resources) 6. 2:40 p.m. Update

  9. Microsoft Word - Draft Combined Committee Agenda for 040914 Rev 2

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    April 09, 2014 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Cities of Gold Conference Center 10-B Cities of Gold Road Pojoaque, NM 87506 AGENDA 1. 2:00 p.m. Approval of Agenda 2. 2:02 p.m. Approval of Minutes from March 12, 2014 3. 2:05 p.m. Old Business 4. 2:15 p.m. New Business  Appoint Nominating Committee for 'FY 15 Election of Board Chair and Vice-Chair (Elections to be held on July 30 th )  Consideration and Action on Draft Recommendation 2014-01 "FY 2016 Budget Priorities." 5. 2:35 p.m. Update

  10. Microsoft Word - Draft Combined Committee Agenda for 061114 Rev 1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Wednesday, June 11, 2014 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. NNMCAB Office 94 Cities of Gold Road Santa Fe, NM 87506 AGENDA 1. 2:00 p.m. Approval of Agenda 2. 2:02 p.m. Approval of Minutes from April 9, 2014 3. 2:05 p.m. Old Business  Report from Annual Evaluation Ad Hoc Committee, Suggested Changes to Board Processes - Puglisi, Sanderson, Pacheco 4. 2:15 p.m. New Business  Consideration and Action on Draft Recommendation 2014-02 "Institution of Measures to Help Insure WIPP and LANL Transuranic

  11. Microsoft Word - Hg SEIS NNMCAB Member Comments Letter Rev 1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    13, 2013 David Levenstein, EIS Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Compliance, EM-11 P.O. Box 2612 Germantown, MD 20874-2612 Cannon HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Mr. Levenstein, On Behalf of the Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board, I would like to submit comments for the Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Several Members of the Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board attended the Public Hearing at the Crown Plaza Hotel in

  12. Microsoft Word - MARK YOUR CALENDARS_REV3.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    MARK YOUR CALENDARS! The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Transportation External Coordination Working Group (TEC) Meeting will be held September 20-22, 2004 The registration table will open at Noon on September 20 and remain open through September 22. Participation in Topic Group Sessions for topic group members only. Monday, September 20 - The Tribal Topic Group session will meet from 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 21 - Topic Groups sessions will be held as follows: - 8:00 a.m. - 12:00

  13. Microsoft Word - NNMCAB Recommendation 2013-04 Rev 1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NNMCAB Recommendation 2013-04 Approved May 22, 2013 Update to be provided by DDFO, as a Standing Board Meeting Agenda Item NORTHERN NEW MEXICO CITIZENS' ADVISORY BOARD (NNMCAB) Recommendation to the Department of Energy No. 2013-04 Recommendation for LANL Clean-up Authored by Lawrence Longacre The Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board (NNMCAB) is a federally charted committee to provide meaningful and timely advice and recommendations to the Los Alamos National Laboratory and to the

  14. parking map_sept2015rev.cdr

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Cyclotron Institute Construction Area University Drive Radiation Effects Facility Visitor Parking Options 1: . There are two 24-hour reserved spaces numbered and . If no one is...

  15. Microsoft Word - Draft Option Mod Oct - Dec 2011 rev 1

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Attachment to Modification M231 B&W Pantex Contract No. DE-AC54-00AL66620 Page 2 of 5 The purpose of this Modification is to incorporate FAR 52.217-9; exercise the First Three-Month Option Period; Revise Section F, DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE, paragraph F.1; revise Section F, DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE, paragraph F.3; revise Section F, DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE, Paragraph F.4; revise Section B, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS, paragraph B.2(a)(2); and, revise Section B, SUPPLIES OR

  16. Microsoft Word - FY 2012 Draft Preface Rev 0.docx

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Signature of Kevin Smith Signature of Kevin Smith Signature of Kevin Smith Signature of I.E. Richardson, III Signature of I.E. Richardson, III Signature of I.E. Richardson, III Signature of Robert Poole Signature of Robert Poole Signature of Robert Poole

  17. Microsoft Word - FY 2012 Draft Preface Rev 0.docx

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

  18. FY15 KCP Performance Evaluation Plan Rev 0.pdf

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

  19. Microsoft Word - APP VI, Rev 3 _03-19-20

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Appendix VI Corrective Action Strategy Revision No.: 3 March 2010 Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) FFACO, Appendix VI March 2010 Revision 3 Page i of vi Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iv List of

  20. Microsoft Word - REV1 Energy Plan Chapter 1.doc

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ann on applcvation on projectsoer m asures that ca not bedonte tr- FY 2009 NNSA/NSO Energy Executable Plan December 2008 1-3 of the ISMS is implemented. DOE Order 450.1A, Environmental Protection Program, also requires contractors to have an EMS, which is incorporated into an ISMS program. This EMS Description is the framework used to implement the NSTec EMS. NSTec has obtained certification of its EMS through the International Organization for Standardization by meeting the requirements of ISO

  1. Microsoft Word - REV1 Energy Plan Chapter 1.doc

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    annual budget requests and prioritized for application in projects or measures that cannot be done through private sector financing or as a cost share to ESPCs where permitted. 1.3 Environmental Management System NSTec uses an environmental management system (EMS) to establish, track, and review its progress towards the energy efficiency, water conservation, greenhouse gas reduction, and renewable energy goals as reflected in this Plan. The NNSA/NSO contract with NSTec requires that an

  2. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    applicable guidance documents and agreements. Caution shall be exercised during the bird nesting season (mid-March to mid-July) . If nesting birds, pair of birds of the same...

  3. Microsoft Word - INS-O-07-02 - OST Final 071307rev.doc

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CONTROLS OVER AMMUNITION WITHIN THE OFFICE OF SECURE TRANSPORTATION U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Inspections and Special Inquiries Inspection ...

  4. Nuclear Facility Construction- Structural Concrete, May 29, 2009 (HSS CRAD 64-15, Rev. 0)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This Criteria Review and Approach Document (HSS CRAD 64-15) establishes review criteria and lines of inquiry used by the Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations to assess the quality of the manufacturing and placement of concrete used in nuclear facility construction at the Department of Energy

  5. Microsoft PowerPoint - Thomas Shaw.DOE rev3.pptx

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Safely offloaded 9,222 ships totaling: 9.8 billion barrels since 1981 Mars and Endymion production streams: Over 2 billion barrels In the early stages of reversal: Accounts for approximately 10% of the oil handled at LOOP Marine Terminal Offshore Production HoHo Pipeline Linking World Energy Producers ..... 3 To America's Refineries 2.4 MMBPD of Refining Capacity 4 70 Million Barrels of Storage LOOP has 15 above ground storage tanks, each with a capacity of 600,000 barrels, for a total capacity

  6. Microsoft Word - 20140415 Infrastructure Constraints in New England 1835 FINAL GW REV

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    April 15, 2014 To: Members of the Public From: Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Secretariat and Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Staff, United States Department of Energy Re: Infrastructure Constraints in New England 1. Introduction On January 9, 2014, President Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum establishing a Quadrennial Energy Review. The Secretary of Energy was directed to provide support to the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force (QER Task Force), including coordination of

  7. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    perform actions to conserve energy or water, demonstrate potential energy or water conservation, and promote energy efficiency that would not have the potential to cause ...

  8. Advanced Simulation and Computing FY09-FY10 Implementation Plan Volume 2, Rev. 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kissel, L

    2009-04-01

    The Stockpile Stewardship Program (SSP) is a single, highly integrated technical program for maintaining the surety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. The SSP uses past nuclear test data along with current and future non-nuclear test data, computational modeling and simulation, and experimental facilities to advance understanding of nuclear weapons. It includes stockpile surveillance, experimental research, development and engineering programs, and an appropriately scaled production capability to support stockpile requirements. This integrated national program requires the continued use of current facilities and programs along with new experimental facilities and computational enhancements to support these programs. The Advanced Simulation and Computing Program (ASC) is a cornerstone of the SSP, providing simulation capabilities and computational resources to support the annual stockpile assessment and certification, to study advanced nuclear weapons design and manufacturing processes, to analyze accident scenarios and weapons aging, and to provide the tools to enable stockpile Life Extension Programs (LEPs) and the resolution of Significant Finding Investigations (SFIs). This requires a balanced resource, including technical staff, hardware, simulation software, and computer science solutions. In its first decade, the ASC strategy focused on demonstrating simulation capabilities of unprecedented scale in three spatial dimensions. In its second decade, ASC is focused on increasing its predictive capabilities in a three-dimensional simulation environment while maintaining support to the SSP. The program continues to improve its unique tools for solving progressively more difficult stockpile problems (focused on sufficient resolution, dimensionality and scientific details); to quantify critical margins and uncertainties (QMU); and to resolve increasingly difficult analyses needed for the SSP. Moreover, ASC has restructured its business model from one that was very successful in delivering an initial capability to one that is integrated and focused on requirements-driven products that address long-standing technical questions related to enhanced predictive capability in the simulation tools. ASC must continue to meet three objectives: (1) Robust Tools - Develop robust models, codes, and computational techniques to support stockpile needs such as refurbishments, SFIs, LEPs, annual assessments, and evolving future requirements; (2) Prediction through Simulation - Deliver validated physics and engineering tools to enable simulations of nuclear weapons performance in a variety of operational environments and physical regimes and to enable risk-informed decisions about the performance, safety, and reliability of the stockpile; and (3) Balanced Operational Infrastructure - Implement a balanced computing platform acquisition strategy and operational infrastructure to meet Directed Stockpile Work (DSW) and SSP needs for capacity and high-end simulation capabilities.

  9. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    procedures to identify plant and animal species for protection under the Endangered Species Act, candidates for protection, or listing by federal or state agencies as threatened...

  10. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    procedures to identify plant and animal species for protection under the Endangered Species Act, candidates for protection, or listing by federal or state agencies as threatened...

  11. Microsoft PowerPoint - Marcinowski April 2010 (Rev3).ppt [Compatibilit...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    to ensure all disposal alternatives are evaluated Recent developments and changes... * Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator at Oak * Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator...

  12. Microsoft Word - TSLCC 2007_5_05_08 rev 1.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    RW-0591 Analysis of the Total System Life Cycle Cost of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program, Fiscal Year 2007 July 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian...

  13. Microsoft Word - Final DOE-CBFO-01-3107 PDP Management Plan_rev...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    measurement results (i.e., spreadsheets developed using commercial software such as Microsoft Excel) shall be in conformance with QAPD requirements. Commercial software is exempt...

  14. Microsoft Word - 0500808_110205 2-6-07 rev.doc

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... ORGANIZATIONAL SECURITY Information security infrastructure. Security of third party access. Outsourcing. f Draft 3 , August 14, 2004 g Draft 1.0, Sept. 15, 2004 NSTB 14 A Summary ...

  15. QP-2.1 Personnel Training and Qualification Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  16. QP-3.2 Causal Analysis and Trending Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  17. QP-5.2 Memo-Correspondence Control and Tracking Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  18. QP-9.1 Management Asssessment and Self-Assessment Rev0.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  19. Microsoft PowerPoint - Janaskie, 4-27-10 SSAB Excess Facilities Presentation Rev. 2.pptx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    i h DOE Si P i h DOE Si S ifi S ifi Presentation to the DOE Site Presentation to the DOE Site- -Specific Specific Advisory Board (SSAB): Advisory Board (SSAB): Transfer of Excess Facilities, Materials and Wastes Transfer of Excess Facilities, Materials and Wastes i t th Offi f E i t l M t (EM) i t th Offi f E i t l M t (EM) into the Office of Environmental Management (EM) into the Office of Environmental Management (EM) Mark Janaskie Mark Janaskie Office of Strategic Planning & Analysis

  20. Microsoft PowerPoint - Marcinowski April 2010 (Rev3).ppt [Compatibility Mode]

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Waste and Materials Disposition Update EM Site Specific Advisory Board Chairs Meeting Oak Ridge, Tennessee April 28, 2010 Frank Marcinowski Acting Chief Technical Officer and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Technical and Regulatory Support Office of Environmental Management Office of Environmental Management Outline for Discussion * EM radioactive waste management priorities, budget, and policy overview * Programmatic updates and challenges - LLW/MLLW disposition - TRU waste acceleration and

  1. Microsoft PowerPoint - Surash.EMAB Presentation 2010 rev91010 (3)2 [Compatibility Mode]

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Environmental Management Advisory Board Advisory Board J.E. Surash, PE J.E. Surash, PE Deputy Assistant Secretary for Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Contract Management Acquisition and Contract Management September 15, 2010 Recent Major Contract Awards Savannah River Security Services 10/09 $989M Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing 10/09 $160M Center Paducah Infrastructure Support Services 11/09 $75M 222- S Lab Laboratory Analytical Services 11/09 $48M Portsmouth Facility

  2. Microsoft Word - Welcome David Huizenga from EM SSAB - FINAL DRAFT_rev4_.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    August 11, 2011 David Huizenga Acting Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy, EM-1 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Dear Acting Assistant Secretary Huizenga: The eight local boards that make up the Office of Environmental Management's Site- Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB) welcome you to your new position as Acting Assistant Secretary for EM. We look forward to continuing the positive, collaborative working relationship that the EM SSAB has

  3. SFS Exhibit A (Rev. 8.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 9/27/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  4. CI-OFF Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev 0.4, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-A1 COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Mar 2012) ......

  5. TM Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 7.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 9/27/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  6. Advanced Simulation and Computing FY10-FY11 Implementation Plan Volume 2, Rev. 0.5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Meisner, R; Peery, J; McCoy, M; Hopson, J

    2009-09-08

    The Stockpile Stewardship Program (SSP) is a single, highly integrated technical program for maintaining the surety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. The SSP uses past nuclear test data along with current and future non-nuclear test data, computational modeling and simulation, and experimental facilities to advance understanding of nuclear weapons. It includes stockpile surveillance, experimental research, development and engineering (D&E) programs, and an appropriately scaled production capability to support stockpile requirements. This integrated national program requires the continued use of current facilities and programs along with new experimental facilities and computational enhancements to support these programs. The Advanced Simulation and Computing Program (ASC) is a cornerstone of the SSP, providing simulation capabilities and computational resources to support the annual stockpile assessment and certification, to study advanced nuclear weapons design and manufacturing processes, to analyze accident scenarios and weapons aging, and to provide the tools to enable stockpile Life Extension Programs (LEPs) and the resolution of Significant Finding Investigations (SFIs). This requires a balanced resource, including technical staff, hardware, simulation software, and computer science solutions. In its first decade, the ASC strategy focused on demonstrating simulation capabilities of unprecedented scale in three spatial dimensions. In its second decade, ASC is focused on increasing its predictive capabilities in a three-dimensional (3D) simulation environment while maintaining support to the SSP. The program continues to improve its unique tools for solving progressively more difficult stockpile problems (focused on sufficient resolution, dimensionality and scientific details); to quantify critical margins and uncertainties (QMU); and to resolve increasingly difficult analyses needed for the SSP. Moreover, ASC has restructured its business model from one that was very successful in delivering an initial capability to one that is integrated and focused on requirements-driven products that address long-standing technical questions related to enhanced predictive capability in the simulation tools. ASC must continue to meet three objectives: (1) Robust Tools - Develop robust models, codes, and computational techniques to support stockpile needs such as refurbishments, SFIs, LEPs, annual assessments, and evolving future requirements; (2) Prediction through Simulation - Deliver validated physics and engineering tools to enable simulations of nuclear weapons performance in a variety of operational environments and physical regimes and to enable risk-informed decisions about the performance, safety, and reliability of the stockpile; and (3) Balanced Operational Infrastructure - Implement a balanced computing platform acquisition strategy and operational infrastructure to meet Directed Stockpile Work (DSW) and SSP needs for capacity and high-end simulation capabilities.

  7. Microsoft Word - NURETH-14_Paper_397_rev June 15- no review track...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NUCLEATE POOL BOILING X. Duan, J. Buongiorno and T. McKrell Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA Abstract High-resolution data of nucleate pool...

  8. Rev.1 U.S. D EPARTMENT OF ENERGY Contractor Records Custodian...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Clearance ARCIS (select one or more permissions below) Read Retrieve Request ERA (complete NARA's ERA Account Request Form) Records Groups (list all that apply) Charge Codes (list ...

  9. Safety analysis report for the TRUPACT-II shipping package (condensed version). Volume 1, Rev. 14

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-10-01

    The condensed version of the TRUPACT-II Contact Handled Transuranic Waste Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) contains essential material required by TRUPACT-II users, plus additional contents (payload) information previously submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. All or part of the following sections, which are not required by users of the TRUPACT-II, are deleted from the condensed version: (i) structural analysis, (ii) thermal analysis, (iii) containment analysis, (iv) criticality analysis, (v) shielding analysis, and (vi) hypothetical accident test results.

  10. CPFFS Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 8.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on claims shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97). GC-37 BANKRUPTCY (Jun 2009) In...

  11. NCIPO Ex A (Rev. 2.1, 4/9/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on claims shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97). GC-38A RECORDS AND AUDIT (Jan...

  12. CONST Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 5.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on claims shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97). GC-37 BANKRUPTCY (Jun 2009) In...

  13. CI-ON Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev 0.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on claims shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97). GC-41 INDEMNITY (Jun 2009) (a)...

  14. CONST Ex A (Rev. 5.1, 4/9/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    on claims shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97). GC-37 BANKRUPTCY (Jun 2009) In...

  15. Selected stratigraphic data for drill holes located in Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site. Rev. 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Drellack, S.L. Jr.

    1997-02-01

    Stratigraphic data are presented in tabular form for 72 holes drilled in Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, between 1950 and 1993. Three pairs of data presentations are included for each hole: depth to formation tops, formation thicknesses, and formation elevations are presented in both field (English) and metric units. Also included for each hole, where available, are various construction data (hole depth, hole diameter, surface location coordinates) and certain information of hydrogeologic significance (depth to water level, top of zeolitization). The event name is given for holes associated with a particular nuclear test. An extensive set of footnotes is included, which indicates data sources and provides other information. The body of the report describes the stratigraphic setting of Frenchman Flat, gives drill-hole naming conventions and database terminology, and provides other background and reference material.

  16. Redox Control For Hanford HLW Feeds VSL-12R2530-1, REV 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kruger, A. A. [Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, Richland, Washington (United States); Matlack, Keith S. [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States); Pegg, Ian L. [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States); Kot, Wing K. [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States); Joseph, Innocent [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States)

    2012-12-13

    The principal objectives of this work were to investigate the effects of processing simulated Hanford HLW at the estimated maximum concentrations of nitrates and oxalates and to identify strategies to mitigate any processing issues resulting from high concentrations of nitrates and oxalates. This report provides results for a series of tests that were performed on the DM10 melter system with simulated C-106/AY-102 HLW. The tests employed simulated HLW feeds containing variable amounts of nitrates and waste organic compounds corresponding to maximum concentrations proj ected for Hanford HLW streams in order to determine their effects on glass production rate, processing characteristics, glass redox conditions, melt pool foaming, and the tendency to form secondary phases. Such melter tests provide information on key process factors such as feed processing behavior, dynamic effects during processing, processing rates, off-gas amounts and compositions, foaming control, etc., that cannot be reliably obtained from crucible melts.

  17. COMPILATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ORP GLASS FORMULATION DATABASE, VSL-12R2470-1 REV 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kruger, Albert A. [Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, Richland, Washington (United States); Pasieka, Holly K. [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States); Muller, Isabelle [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States); Gilbo, Konstantin [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States); Perez-Cardenas, Fernando [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States); Joseph, Innocent [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States); Pegg, Ian L. [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States); Kot, Wing K. [The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC (United States)

    2012-12-13

    The present report describes the first steps in the development of a glass property-composition database for WTP LAW and HL W glasses that includes all of the data that were used in the development of the WTP baseline models and all of the data collected subsequently as part of WTP enhancement studies perfonned for ORP. The data were reviewed to identifY some of the more significant gaps in the composition space that will need to be filled to support waste processing at Hanford. The WTP baseline models have been evaluated against the new data in terms of range of validity and prediction perfonnance.

  18. Utility Assessment Report for SPIDERS Phase 2: Ft. Carson (Rev 1.0)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Barr, Jonathan L.; Tuffner, Francis K.; Hadley, Mark D.; Schneider, Kevin P.

    2014-01-01

    This document contains the Utility Assessment Report (UAR) for the Phase 2 operational Demonstration (OD) of the Smart Power Infrastructure Demonstration for Energy Reliability and Security (SPIDERS) Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD). The UAR for Phase 2 shows that the SPIDERS system was able to meet the requirements of the Implementation Directive at Ft. Carson.

  19. Microsoft PowerPoint - Surash.EMAB Presentation 2010 rev91010...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    base, 5-year option Integral component of the site safety management system Fitness-for-duty evaluations, first aid services, drug screening, medical qualifications and...

  20. Microsoft Word - 3Q15 Web Rev0 11-2-15

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5 SRR-ESH-2015-00110 Revision 0 Post Date: November 30, 2015 Page 1 of 6 Z-Area Saltstone Disposal Facility Permit General Condition B.5.a-h Information and Consent Order of...

  1. CI-OFF Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev 0.4, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4, 9/27/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-A1 COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Mar 2012) ........................................................................................... 2 GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Mar 2012) ......................................................................................................... 4 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ....................... 4 GC-6A ORDER OF

  2. CI-ON Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev 0.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 9/27/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 12 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-A1 COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Mar 2012) ........................................................................................... 2 GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Mar 2012) ......................................................................................................... 4 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ....................... 4 GC-5 NOTICE TO

  3. CONST Ex A (Rev. 5.1, 4/9/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1, 4/9/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 39 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Apr 2013) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  4. CONST Ex A (Rev. 5.2, 6/14/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2, 6/14/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Apr 2013) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  5. CONST Ex A (Rev. 5.4, 12/15/14) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4, 12/15/14) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Apr 2013) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  6. CONST Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 5.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 9/27/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 27 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Apr 2013) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  7. CPFFS Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 8.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 9/27/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  8. CX-00040Rev_1_Security_Barrier_for_618-11.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  9. CX-00044 Rev 1 PNNL B3-15 R_D Nanoscale.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  10. CX-00067 Rev 1 PNNL B3-12 Microbio _ Biomedical Research.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  11. CX-00068 Rev 1 PNNL B3-6 Small Scale R_D.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  12. CX-00069 Rev 1 PNNL B1-3 Rountine Maintenance.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  13. CX-00070 Rev 1 PNNL B1-15 Support Buildings.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  14. CX-00071 Rev 1 PNNL B2-5 Facility Safety and Enviro Improvements.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  15. CX-00072 Rev 1 PNNL B3-1 Site Characterization.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  16. PublicOutreach--DOENV-1048-REV5_update_review.indd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Clean Desert Operation Clean Desert is a set of activities following the adventures of Dr. Proton and Adam the Atom as they learn about the Nevada National Security Site. The Operation Clean Desert learning program provides details on environmental concerns such as groundwater and radioactive waste disposal. Available resources include an activity book and teacher's lesson plan with student worksheet. Publications An extensive library of informational materials are available to the public in

  17. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Air Conditioning Systems for Existing Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.4 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform installation or modification of air conditioning systems

  18. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Air Conditioning Systems for Existing Equipment under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B1.4 for Calendar Year 2015. II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform installation or modification of air conditioning systems

  19. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Asbestos Removal under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.l6 for Calendar Year 2015. II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors remove asbestos-containing materials (ACM) from buildings in accordance with applicable

  20. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Oil Spill Cleanup under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B5.6 for Calendar Year 2015. II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA} and its subcontractors perform removal of oil and contaminated materials recovered in oil spill cleanup operations and

  1. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    42 Radiological Survey Activities in the 600 Area of the Hanford Site Supporting Land Conveyance II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): The U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations (DOE-RL) proposes to conduct radiological surveys of a portion of the 600 Area of the Hanford Site. The surveys are needed to

  2. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Routine Maintenance and Custodial Services under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, 81.3 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform routine maintenance activities and custodial services for

  3. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Drop-Off, Collection, and Transfer Facilities for Recyclable Materials under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, Bl.35 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform siting, construction, modification,

  4. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B2.5 for Calendar Year 2014 II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions - e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform safety and environmental improvements of a facility

  5. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document ID Number:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Facility Safety and Environmental Improvements under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B2.5 for Calendar Year 2015. II. Project Description and Location (including Time Period over which proposed action will occur and Project Dimensions -e.g., acres displaced/disturbed, excavation length/depth, area/location/number of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform safety and environmental improvements of a facility

  6. Microsoft Word - NNSS Profile Instructions- Rev 0 02-27-12-Final...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    of approval status will be provided. Approved profiles shall be reevaluated by the generator annually, and the profile amended as needed. Profiles must be changed if the...

  7. Off-Site Waste Certification Guidance and NNSSWAC Compliance Rev 1.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  8. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    may be moved to locations on the Hanford Site. Incidental materials and waste (surplus construction materials, construction debris, hazardous, radioactive, polychlorinated...

  9. Microsoft Word - RL14788-Section_J-08 Advance Understanding Rev...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    according to local custom. FAR Subpart 31.205-13, Employee morale, health, welfare, food service, and dormitory costs and credits Annual Employee Morale Fund: Costs incurred...

  10. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Building and Equipment Instrumentation under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B, B2.2 for Calendar Year 2015. II. Project Description and...

  11. In Vivo Monitoring Program Manual, PNL-MA-574, Rev 5.1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lynch, Timothy P.

    2011-09-12

    The following sections provide an overview of the administration for the In Vivo Monitoring Program (IVMP) for Hanford. This includes the organizational structure and program responsibilities; coordination of in vivo measurements; scheduling measurements; performing measurements; reporting results; and quality assurance.

  12. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    the potential aggregated impacts to ensure no extraordinary circumstances exist. This Annual CX shall be reauthorized for use by the Hanford NEPA Compliance Officer each...

  13. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This Annual CX shall only be applied to actions that meet the requirements (i.e., 10 CFR...

  14. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This Annual CX shall only be applied to actions that meet the requirements (i.e., 10 CFR...

  15. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    the potential aggregated impacts to ensure no extraordinary circumstances exist. This Annual ex shall be reauthorized for use by the Hanford NEPA Compliance Officer each...

  16. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    the potential aggregated impacts to ensure no extraordinary circumstances exist. This Annual CX shall be reauthorized for use by the Hanford NEPA Compliance Officer each...

  17. Microsoft Word - DOE-CBFO-01-3107 PDP Management Plan_rev 8_final

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CBFO-01-3107 PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN Revision 8 February 2016 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office TRU Sites and Transportation Division This document supersedes DOE/CBFO-01-3107, Revision 7. DOE/CBFO-01-3107 Revision 8 PDP Management Plan February 2016 2 Performance Demonstration Program Management Plan DOE/CBFO-01-3107 Revision 8 February 2016 Approved By: //signature on file// Date: 2/18/2016 Director CBFO TRU Sites and Transportation Division Concurred

  18. Microsoft Word - DOE-WIPP-02-3122-REV7 4-FINAL

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    02-3122 TRANSURANIC WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT Revision 7.4 Effective Date: April 22, 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office 2 This document has been submitted as required to: Office of Scientific and Technical Information U.S. Department of Energy PO Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (865) 576-8401 Additional information about this document may be obtained by calling 1-800-336-9477. Unlimited, publicly available full-text scientific and technical

  19. Microsoft Word - EOC Deactivation News Release rev. 1 3.20.15 FINAL

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Deactivated CARLSBAD, N.M., 3/23/2015 4:03 PM (MST) - The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Emergency Operations Center (EOC) has been deactivated after it was determined that an event located within the 16-square mile WIPP Land Withdrawal Area (LWA) had no impact on WIPP operations. At about 1:45 p.m. (MST) today, the WIPP EOC was activated as a precautionary measure after a natural gas pipeline over-pressurized and vented about 420 gallons of mixed liquid natural gas. The event occurred

  20. Microsoft Word - NDA_Drum_PDP_Rev 5- Final 2-5-2015

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5 Performance Demonstration Program Plan for Nondestructive Assay of Drummed Wastes for the TRU Waste Characterization Program Revision 5 February 2015 This document supersedes DOE/CBFO-01-1005, Revision 4 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office TRU Sites and Transportation Division DOE/CBFO-01-1005 Revision 5 NDA Drum PDP Plan February 2015 2 This document has been submitted as required to: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information PO Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN

  1. Microsoft Word - Trident Orientation for Visiting Experimenters rev 12-13.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Orientation for Visiting Experimenters This training is a general orientation for workers in the Trident Target areas. In addition, all workers must be authorized for any medium or high hazard activities by following and signing the Trident Target Area Operations IWD Name: ___________________________________________ Z no. ________ Organization: _________________________ Tel: _________ Date: ________ I am authorized to perform the following tasks at LANL: ______ Operate and align class 3b & 4

  2. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    operations. Proposed actions include those necessary to implement transportation such as packaging, container handling, material storage, waste management, and equipment...

  3. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (such as assessment of potential wind energy resources); (i) Sampling of flora or fauna; (j) Archaeological, historic, and cultural resource identification in compliance with...

  4. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (such as assessment of potential wind energy resources); (i) Sampling of flora or fauna; (j) Archaeological, historic, and cultural resource identification in compliance with...

  5. HNF-EP-0063_Rev16_041111_Website.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  6. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform acquisition, installation, operation, modification, and removal of electricity...

  7. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    of buildings, etc.): Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and its subcontractors perform acquisition, installation, operation, modification, and removal of electricity...

  8. Site Characterization Work Plan for Gasbuggy, New Mexico (Rev.1, Jan. 2002)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office

    2002-01-25

    Project Gasbuggy was the first of three joint government-industry experiments conducted to test the effectiveness of nuclear explosives to fracture deeply buried, low-permeability natural gas reservoirs to stimulate production. The scope of this work plan is to document the environmental objectives and the proposed technical site investigation strategies that will be utilized for the site characterization of the Project Gasbuggy Site. Its goal is the collection of data in sufficient quantity and quality to determine current site conditions, support a risk assessment for the site surfaces, and evaluate if further remedial action is required to achieve permanent closure of the site that is both protective of human health and the environment. The Gasbuggy Site is located approximately 55 air miles east of Farmington, New Mexico, in Rio Arriba County within the Carson National Forest in the northeast portion of the San Juan Basin. Historically, Project Gasbuggy consisted of the joint government-industry detonation of a nuclear device on December 10, 1967, followed by reentry drilling and gas production testing and project evaluation activities in post-detonation operations from 1967 to 1976. Based on historical documentation, no chemical release sites other than the mud pits were identified; additionally, there was no material buried at the Gasbuggy Site other than drilling fluids and construction debris. Although previous characterization and restoration activities including sensitive species surveys, cultural resources surveys, surface geophysical surveys, and limited soil sampling and analysis were performed in 1978 and again in 2000, no formal closure of the site was achieved. Also, these efforts did not adequately address the site's potential for chemical contamination at the surface/shallow subsurface ground levels or the subsurface hazards for potential migration outside of the current site subsurface intrusion restrictions. Additional investigation activities will focus on the surface/shallow subsurface sampling and deep subsurface modeling. Suspected potential contaminants of concern for investigative analysis at the Gasbuggy Site include total petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel- and gasoline-range), volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, and radionuclides. The results of this characterization and risk assessment will be used to evaluate corrective action alternatives to include no further action, the implementation of institutional controls, capping on site, or off-site disposal of contaminated waste which will be presented in a subsequent corrective action decision document.

  9. Microsoft PowerPoint - SRNL-STI-2013-00230 Rev1_Advances in TCAP...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Hydrogen Isotope Separation Using Thermal Cycling Absorption Process (TCAP) X. Steve Xiao Contributions: L.K. Heung, H.T. Sessions, S. Redd H 2 D 2 T 2 H 2 , D 2 , T 2 Hydrogen ...

  10. Microsoft Word - 29Sept12- 17103_Final_Report_rev C

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Modeling the Physical and Biochemical Influence of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Plant Discharges into their Adjacent Waters U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AWARD NO. DE-EE0003638 SEPTEMBER 2010 - AUGUST 2012 Prepared By MAKAI OCEAN ENGINEERING, INC., PO BOX 1206 KAILUA, HAWAII 96734 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: PAT GRANDELLI, P.E GREG ROCHELEAU, JOHN HAMRICK, PH.D, MATT CHURCH, PH.D, BRIAN POWELLPH.D 29 September 2012 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 OTEC Plant 100 MW

  11. Acquisition Letter No. Al 2010-05 Rev 1 - March 20, 2013 | Department...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    of Acquisition and Project Management by phone at (202) 287-1560 or by email to Jason.Taylor@hq.doe.gov. Need More Information on ALs? Visit the website at http:energy.gov...

  12. AGR-2 irradiation test final as-run report, Rev. 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Collin, Blaise

    2014-08-01

    This document presents the as-run analysis of the AGR-2 irradiation experiment. AGR-2 is the second of the planned irradiations for the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program. Funding for this program is provided by the U.S. Department of Energy as part of the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Technical Development Office (TDO) program. The objectives of the AGR-2 experiment are to: (a) Irradiate UCO (uranium oxycarbide) and UO2 (uranium dioxide) fuel produced in a large coater. Fuel attributes are based on results obtained from the AGR-1 test and other project activities; (b) Provide irradiated fuel samples for post-irradiation experiment (PIE) and safety testing; and, (c) Support the development of an understanding of the relationship between fuel fabrication processes, fuel product properties, and irradiation performance. The primary objective of the test was to irradiate both UCO and UO2 TRISO (tri-structural isotropic) fuel produced from prototypic scale equipment to obtain normal operation and accident condition fuel performance data. The UCO compacts were subjected to a range of burnups and temperatures typical of anticipated prismatic reactor service conditions in three capsules. The test train also includes compacts containing UO2 particles produced independently by the United States, South Africa, and France in three separate capsules. The range of burnups and temperatures in these capsules were typical of anticipated pebble bed reactor service conditions. The results discussed in this report pertain only to U.S. produced fuel. In order to achieve the test objectives, the AGR-2 experiment was irradiated in the B-12 position of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for a total irradiation duration of 559.2 effective full power days (EFPD). Irradiation began on June 22, 2010, and ended on October 16, 2013, spanning 12 ATR power cycles and approximately three and a half calendar years. The test contained six independently controlled and monitored capsules. Each U.S. capsule contained 12 compacts of either UCO or UO2 AGR coated fuel. No fuel particles failed during the AGR-2 irradiation. Final burnup values on a per compact basis ranged from 7.26 to 13.15% FIMA (fissions per initial heavy-metal atom) for UCO fuel, and 9.01 to 10.69% FIMA for UO2 fuel, while fast fluence values ranged from 1.94 to 3.471025 n/m2 (E >0.18 MeV) for UCO fuel, and from 3.05 to 3.531025 n/m2 (E >0.18 MeV) for UO2 fuel. Time-average volume-average (TAVA) temperatures on a capsule basis at the end of irradiation ranged from 987C in Capsule 6 to 1296C in Capsule 2 for UCO, and from 996 to 1062C in UO2-fueled Capsule 3. By the end of the irradiation, all of the installed thermocouples (TCs) had failed. Fission product release-to-birth (R/B) ratios were quite low. In the UCO capsules, R/B values during the first three cycles were below 10-6 with the exception of the hotter Capsule 2, in which the R/Bs reached 210-6. In the UO2 capsule (Capsule 3), the R/B values during the first three cycles were below 10-7. R/B values for all following cycles are not reliable due to gas flow and cross talk issues.

  13. AGR-2 Irradiation Test Final As-Run Report, Rev 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Blaise Collin

    2014-08-01

    This document presents the as-run analysis of the AGR-2 irradiation experiment. AGR-2 is the second of the planned irradiations for the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program. Funding for this program is provided by the U.S. Department of Energy as part of the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Technical Development Office (TDO) program. The objectives of the AGR-2 experiment are to: (a) Irradiate UCO (uranium oxycarbide) and UO2 (uranium dioxide) fuel produced in a large coater. Fuel attributes are based on results obtained from the AGR-1 test and other project activities. (b) Provide irradiated fuel samples for post-irradiation experiment (PIE) and safety testing. (c) Support the development of an understanding of the relationship between fuel fabrication processes, fuel product properties, and irradiation performance. The primary objective of the test was to irradiate both UCO and UO2 TRISO (tri-structural isotropic) fuel produced from prototypic scale equipment to obtain normal operation and accident condition fuel performance data. The UCO compacts were subjected to a range of burnups and temperatures typical of anticipated prismatic reactor service conditions in three capsules. The test train also includes compacts containing UO2 particles produced independently by the United States, South Africa, and France in three separate capsules. The range of burnups and temperatures in these capsules were typical of anticipated pebble bed reactor service conditions. The results discussed in this report pertain only to U.S. produced fuel. In order to achieve the test objectives, the AGR-2 experiment was irradiated in the B-12 position of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for a total irradiation duration of 559.2 effective full power days (EFPD). Irradiation began on June 22, 2010, and ended on October 16, 2013, spanning 12 ATR power cycles and approximately three and a half calendar years. The test contained six independently controlled and monitored capsules. Each U.S. capsule contained 12 compacts of either UCO or UO2 AGR coated fuel. No fuel particles failed during the AGR-2 irradiation. Final burnup values on a per compact basis ranged from 7.26 to 13.15% FIMA (fissions per initial heavy-metal atom) for UCO fuel, and 9.01 to 10.69% FIMA for UO2 fuel, while fast fluence values ranged from 1.94 to 3.471025 n/m2 (E >0.18 MeV) for UCO fuel, and from 3.05 to 3.531025 n/m2 (E >0.18 MeV) for UO2 fuel. Time-average volume-average (TAVA) temperatures on a capsule basis at the end of irradiation ranged from 987C in Capsule 6 to 1296C in Capsule 2 for UCO, and from 996 to 1062C in UO2-fueled Capsule 3. By the end of the irradiation, all of the installed thermocouples (TCs) had failed. Fission product release-to-birth (R/B) ratios were quite low. In the UCO capsules, R/B values during the first three cycles were below 10-6 with the exception of the hotter Capsule 2, in which the R/Bs reached 210-6. In the UO2 capsule (Capsule 3), the R/B values during the first three cycles were below 10-7. R/B values for all following cycles are not reliable due to gas flow and cross talk issues.

  14. DOE-CX00080-Rev-1A_Relocation_of_Buildings.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  15. DOE-EIS-0222-SA-01_-_Rev_0_-_[DA07313710].pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  16. DOE_WIPP_93-004_Rev_E_WIPP_Land_Management_Plan.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  17. DOE_CX-00038-Rev4-B1.7.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  18. DOE_CX-00039-Rev4-B1.2.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  19. DOE_CX-00047-Rev4-B1.30.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  20. DOE_CX-00076-Rev-1B_Asbestos_Removal.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  1. DOE_CX-00111-Rev3-B1.3.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  2. DOE_CX-00112-Rev3-B1.4.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  3. DOE_CX-00113-Rev3-B1.15.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  4. DOE_CX-00114-Rev3-B1.16.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  5. DOE_CX-00115-Rev3-B1.17.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  6. DOE_CX-00116-Rev3-B1.22.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  7. DOE_CX-00117-Rev3-B1.27.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  8. DOE_CX-00118-Rev3-B1.31.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  9. DOE_CX-00119-Rev3-B1.32.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  10. DOE_CX-00120-Rev3-B1.35.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  11. DOE_CX-00121-Rev3-B2.2.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  12. DOE_CX-00122-Rev3-B2.5.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  13. DOE_CX-00123-Rev3-B3.1.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  14. DOE_CX-00124-Rev3-B3.6.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  15. DOE_CX-00125-Rev3-B5.1.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  16. DOE_CX-00126-Rev3-B5.6.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  17. DOE_CX-00129-Rev3-B6.4.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  18. DOE_CX-00145-Rev0-B5.4.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  19. DOE_CX_00082_Rev_1_2013_11_07.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  20. Microsoft Word - Cp3U-CO ms-rev-sub.doc

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... References 1) Brennan, J. G.; Andersen, R. A.; Robbins, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 335. 2) Bursten, B. E.; Strittmatter, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6606. 3) (a) ...

  1. D-B CONST Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 4.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 9/27/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 29 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Apr 2013) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  2. Nevada Test Site Waste Acceptance Criteria (NTSWAC), Rev. 7-01

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    NSTec Environmental Management

    2009-05-01

    This document establishes the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, Nevada Test Site Waste Acceptance Criteria (NTSWAC). The NTSWAC provides the requirements, terms, and conditions under which the Nevada Test Site (NTS) will accept low-level radioactive waste and mixed low-level waste for disposal. The NTSWAC includes requirements for the generator waste certification program, characterization, traceability, waste form, packaging, and transfer. The criteria apply to radioactive waste received at the NTS Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Complex for disposal.

  3. NCIPO Ex A (Rev. 2.1, 4/9/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1, 4/9/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Jan 2010) .......................................................................................................... 2 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ....................... 2 GC-6A ORDER OF PRECEDENCE (Jan 2010) ................................................................................... 2 GC-8A COMPLIANCE WITH

  4. NCIPO Ex A (Rev. 2.2, 6/14/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2, 6/14/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 11 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Jan 2010) .......................................................................................................... 2 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ....................... 2 GC-6A ORDER OF PRECEDENCE (Jan 2010) ................................................................................... 2 GC-8A COMPLIANCE WITH

  5. NCIPO Ex A (Rev. 2.3, 8/20/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 8/20/13) Exhibit A General Conditions EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Jan 2010) .......................................................................................................... 2 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ....................... 2 GC-5 NOTICE TO PROCEED (Jul 2011) ........................................................................................... 2 GC-6A ORDER OF PRECEDENCE (Jan

  6. NCIPO Ex A (Rev. 2.4, 8/20/14) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4, 8/20/14) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 12 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Jan 2010) .......................................................................................................... 2 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ....................... 2 GC-5 NOTICE TO PROCEED (Jul 2011) ........................................................................................... 2 GC-6A ORDER OF

  7. NCIPO Ex A (Rev. 2.5, 9/26/14) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5, 9/26/14) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Jan 2010) .......................................................................................................... 2 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ....................... 2 GC-5 NOTICE TO PROCEED (Jul 2011) ........................................................................................... 2 GC-6A ORDER OF

  8. NCIPO Ex A (Rev. 2.6, 3/6/15) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6, 3/6/15) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Jan 2010) .......................................................................................................... 2 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ....................... 2 GC-5 NOTICE TO PROCEED (Jul 2011) ........................................................................................... 2 GC-6A ORDER OF

  9. NCIPO Ex A (Rev. 2.7, 3/26/15) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7, 3/26/15) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 16 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Jan 2010) .......................................................................................................... 2 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ....................... 2 GC-5 NOTICE TO PROCEED (Jul 2011) ........................................................................................... 2 GC-6A ORDER OF

  10. NCIPO Ex A (Rev. 2.8, 11/9/15) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8, 11/9/15) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 16 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1B DEFINITIONS (Jan 2010) ..................................................................................................... 2 GC-2B CORRESPONDENCE AND SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jan 2010) ...................... 2 GC-5 NOTICE TO PROCEED (Jul 2011) ....................................................................................... 2 GC-6A ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

  11. Enhanced Sulfate Management in HLW Glass Formulations VSL12R2540-1 REV 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kruger, A. A.; Pegg, Ian L.; Kot, Wing; Gan, Hao; Matlack, Keith S.

    2012-11-13

    The Low Activity Waste (LAW) tanks that are scheduled to provide the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) with waste feeds contain significant amounts of sulfate. The sulfate content in the LAW feeds is sufficiently high that a separate molten sulfate salt phase may form on top of the glass melt during the vitrification process unless suitable glass formulations are employed and sulfate levels are controlled. Since the formation of the salt phase is undesirable from many perspectives, mitigation approaches had to be developed. Considerable progress has been made and reported by the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) in enhancing sulfate incorporation into LAW glass melts and developing strategies to manage and mitigate the risks associated with high-sulfate feeds.

  12. Microsoft Word - 2Q10Web Rev 1, 10-25-10.docm

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    10 SRR-ESH-2010-00093 Revision 1 November 12, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Consent Order of Dismissal, Section III.7 Z-Area Saltstone Disposal Facility Permit General Condition B.5.a-h Information Permit Condition Requirement Estimated Value Updated Value Comments B.5 a) Cumulative process volume of salt waste disposed to date Not Applicable 3,843 kgals Vault 4 b) Process volume of saltstone grout disposed and vault location (cell identity) for the reporting period Not Applicable 386 kgals Vault 4, Cells F,

  13. Microsoft PowerPoint - 16.0855_Raines Draft Rev 4

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Management Update Project Management Update Bob Raines Director, Project Management Systems and Assessments * Everybody's Favorite Subject Cost Estimating * Cost Estimating * EVMS...

  14. Microsoft PowerPoint - Recovery Fact Sheet rev4.ppt [Read-Only...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    under current regulatory documents and current prime contracts, allowing work to begin contaminants, remediate soil contamination in in the 100 BC Areas, expandimprove...

  15. Safety analysis report for the TRUPACT-II shipping package (condensed version). Volume 2, Rev. 14

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-10-01

    This appendix determines the effective G values for payload shipping categories of contact handled transuranic (CH-TRU) waste materials, based on the radiolytic G values for waste materials that are discussed in detail in Appendix 3.6.8 of the Safety Analysis Report for the TRUPACT-II Shipping Package. The effective G values take into account self-absorption of alpha decay energy inside particulate contamination and the fraction of energy absorbed by nongas-generating materials. As described in Appendix 3.6.8, an effective G value, G{sub eff}, is defined by: G{sub eff} - {Sigma}{sub M} (F{sub M} x G{sub M}) F{sub M}-fraction of energy absorbed by material maximum G value for a material where the sum is over all materials present inside a waste container. The G value itself is determined primarily by the chemical properties of the material and its temperature. The value of F is determined primarily by the size of the particles containing the radionuclides, the distribution of radioactivity on the various materials present inside the waste container, and the stopping distance of alpha particles in air, in the waste materials, or in the waste packaging materials.

  16. Second Line of Defense: Electronic Maintenance Reports, Local Maintenance Provider User Guide, Rev. 3

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Leigh, Richard J.

    2012-09-01

    The Electronic Maintenance Report forms allow Local Maintenance Providers (LMP) and other program staff to enter maintenance information into a simple and secure system. This document describes the features and information required to complete the Maintenance Report forms. It is expected that all Corrective Maintenance Reports from LMPs will be submitted electronically into the SLD Portal. As an exception (e.g., when access to the SLD Portal is unavailable), Maintenance Reports can be submitted via a secure Adobe PDF form available through the Sustainability Manager assigned to each country.

  17. Microsoft Word - External Export Control Guidance 6-09 _rev 1...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ITER USIPO Export Control Awareness Recommendations to United States External Parties Supporting the Fusion Project June 5, 2009 Commercial Vendors, Universities and others working...

  18. Site Characterization Work Plan for the Gnome-Coach Site, New Mexico (Rev. 1, January 2002)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office

    2002-01-14

    Project Gnome was the first nuclear experiment conducted under the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), predecessor to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Plowshare Program. The Plowshare Program focused on developing nuclear devices exclusively for peaceful purposes. The intent of the Gnome experiment was to evaluate the effects of a nuclear detonation in a salt medium. Historically, Project Gnome consisted of a single detonation of a nuclear device on December 10, 1961 with the Salado Formation. Since the Gnome detonation, the AEC/DOE has conducted surface restoration, site reconnaissance, and decontamination and decommissioning activities at the site. In addition, annual groundwater sampling is performed under a long-term hydrological monitoring program begun in 1972. Coach, an experiment to be located near the Gnome project, was initially scheduled for 1963. Although construction and rehabilitation were completed for Coach, the experiment was canceled and never executed. Known collectively as Project Gnome-Coach, the site is located approximately 25 miles east of Carlsbad, New Mexico, in Eddy County, and is comprised of nearly 680 acres, of which approximately 60 acres are disturbed from the combined AEC/DOE operations. The scope of this work plan is to document the environmental objectives and the proposed technical site investigation strategies that will be utilized for the site characterization of the project. The subsurface at the Gnome-Coach site has two contaminant sources that are fundamentally different in terms of both their stratigraphic location and release mechanism. The goal of this characterization is to collect data of sufficient quantity and quality to establish current site conditions and to use the data to identify and evaluate if further action is required to protect human health and the environment and achieve permanent closure of the site. The results of these activities will be presented in a subsequent corrective action decision document.

  19. Microsoft Word - FAL 2015-03 FY2015Approp REV 2 FINAL 8-3

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... is a corporation with an unpaid Federal tax liability), the awarding official (e.g., ... In the latter case, the contracting officer would be determining that the offeror lacks ...

  20. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Subpart D, Appendix B) for categorically excluding actions under the provisions of the NEPA regulations. There shall be no extraordinary circumstances where normally excluded...

  1. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Subpart D, Appendix B) for categorically excluding actions under the provisions of the NEPA regulations. There shall be no extraordinary circumstances where normally excluded...

  2. Microsoft Word - AcqGuide70pt15rev9.doc

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    70.15 (Septeber 2008) 1 M&O Contractor Incentives - Fee, Rollover of Performance Fee, and Award Term [Reference, DEAR 970.1504-1] Overview This chapter provides: (1) a synopsis of the M&O contractor fee policy (focused on the mechanics of the calculation and the key considerations of the policy); (2) guidance on a key aspect of the policy, linking performance fee to outcomes, including guidelines on allowing rollover of performance fee; and (3) guidance on the use of the non-fee

  3. Microsoft Word - InjIllRptGuide2011rev8162012.docx

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Injury and Illness Reporting Guide August 2012 Office of Corporate Analysis Office of Health, Safety and Security i TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Injury and Illness Reporting Using CAIRS .................................................................................... 2 Data Elements: Injury and Illness Reports

  4. Microsoft Word - Class 1 PMN_7_Items_9_30_15_Rev. 13

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... HAZMAT trailer Medical Resources Ambulance 1 Equipped as per Federal Specifications KKK-A-1822 and New Mexico Emergency Medical Services Act General Order 35; equipped with a ...

  5. Microsoft Word - 341-03-01_QGESS_FOAKtoNOAK_Rev8_20130813.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    a new technology. The transport gasifier to be demonstrated in Southern Company's Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) project falls into this category. Projects that use N th plant...

  6. Design-only conceptual design report for pit disassembly and conversion facility. Rev 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Zygmunt, S.; Christensen, L.; Richardson, C.

    1997-12-12

    This design-only conceptual design report (DOCDR) was prepared to support a funding request by the Department of Energy (DOE)-Office of Fissile Material Disposition (OFMD) for engineering design of the Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility (PDCF) Project No. 99-D-141. The PDCF will be used to disassemble the nation`s inventory of surplus nuclear weapons pits and convert the plutonium recovered from those pits into a form suitable for storage, international inspection, and final disposition. The PDCF is a complex consisting of a hardened building that will contain the plutonium processes in a safe and secure manner, and conventional buildings and structures that will house support personnel, systems, and equipment. The PDCF uses the Advanced Recovery and Integrated Extraction System (ARIES), a low waste, modular pyroprocessing system to convert pits to plutonium oxide. The PDCF project consists of engineering and design, and construction of the buildings and structures, and engineering and design, procurement, installation, testing and start-up of equipment to disassemble pits and convert plutonium in pits to oxide form. The facility is planned to operate for 10 years, averaging 3.5 metric tons (3.86 tons) of plutonium metal per year. On conclusion of operations, the PDCF will be decontaminated and decommissioned.

  7. 3Q10Web Rev 1, 1-20-11.docm

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Quarter, Calendar Year 2010 SRR-ESH-2010-00148 Revision 1 February 11, 2011 Page 1 of 6 Consent Order of Dismissal, Section III.7 Z-Area Saltstone Disposal Facility Permit General Condition B.5.a-h Information Permit Condition Requirement Estimated Value Updated Value Comments B.5 a) Cumulative process volume of salt waste disposed to date Not Applicable 3,981 kgals Vault 4 b) Process volume of saltstone grout disposed and vault location (cell identity) for the reporting period Not Applicable

  8. Godiva IV and Juliet Diagnostics CED-1, Rev. 1 (IER-176)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Scorby, J C; Myers, W L

    2012-04-11

    The Juliet experiment is currently in preliminary design (IER-128). This experiment will utilize a suite of diagnostics to measure the physical state of the device (temperature, surface motion, stress, etc.) and the total and time rate of change of neutron and gamma fluxes. A variety of potential diagnostics has been proposed in this CED-1 report. Based on schedule and funding, a subset of diagnostics will be selected for testing using the Godiva IV pulsed reactor as a source of neutrons and gammas. The diagnostics development and testing will occur over a two year period (FY12-13) culminating in a final set of diagnostics to be fielded for he Juliet experiment currently proposed for execution in FY15.

  9. LFS Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 8.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 9/27/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 19 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  10. Final Report. Baseline LAW Glass Formulation Testing, VSL-03R3460-1, Rev. 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Muller, Isabelle S.; Pegg, Ian L.; Gan, Hao; Buechele, Andrew; Rielley, Elizabeth; Bazemore, Gina; Cecil, Richard; Hight, Kenneth; Mooers, Cavin; Lai, Shan-Tao T.; Kruger, Albert A.

    2015-06-18

    The major objective of the baseline glass formulation work was to develop and select glass formulations that are compliant with contractual and processing requirements for each of the LAW waste streams. Other objectives of the work included preparation and characterization of glasses with respect to the properties of interest, optimization of sulfate loading in the glasses, evaluation of ability to achieve waste loading limits, testing to demonstrate compatibility of glass melts with melter materials of construction, development of glass formulations to support ILAW qualification activities, and identification of glass formulation issues with respect to contract specifications and processing requirements.

  11. IDIQ BS Ex A (Rev. 3.1, 4/9/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1, 4/9/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 31 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) ......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ....... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR (Jun 2009) ............................................................................ 4 GC-4 SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jun

  12. IDIQ BS Ex A (Rev. 3.2, 6/14/13) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2, 6/14/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 19 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) ......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ....... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR (Jun 2009) ............................................................................ 4 GC-4 SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jun

  13. IDIQ BS Ex A (Rev. 3.4, 12/15/14) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4, 12/15/14) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) ......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ....... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR (Jun 2009) ............................................................................ 4 GC-4 SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jun

  14. IDIQ BS Ex A (Rev. 3.5, 3/6/15) Exhibit A General Conditions

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5, 3/6/15) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) ......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ....... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR (Jun 2009) ............................................................................ 4 GC-4 SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jun

  15. IDIQ BS Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 3.3, 9-27-13)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 9/27/13) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 19 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) ......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ........ 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR (Jun 2009) ............................................................................ 4 GC-4 SUBCONTRACT INTERPRETATION (Jun

  16. Microsoft PowerPoint - February 2, 2007 Agency Update Rev. 2...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    - Office of River Protection CD-01 approved by DOE-HQ on July 2006 CD-2 planned for summer 2007 External Review Report issued September 28, 2006 Revising Project Improvement...

  17. Surface Environmental Surveillance Procedures Manual, PNL-MA-580, Rev. 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hanf, Robert W.; Poston, Ted M.; Bisping, Lynn E.

    2007-07-01

    This manual contains the procedures that are used for the collection of routine Surface Environmental Surveillance Project environmental samples and field measurements on and around the Hanford Site. Specific responsibilities for project personnel are also defined.

  18. ENERGY STAR CERTIFIED HOMES, VERSION 3 (REV. 08) NATIONAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Revision 08 is the most significant revision of the ENERGY STAR Certified Homes specs since the release of Version 3. This update reduces the paperwork and streamlines the certification process,...

  19. C:\\DS\\97-2238, Rev. 8 - Final.wpd

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    A; and (3) the filtered exhaust from the Waste Handling Building (WHB) sampled at Station C. Current sampling locations and methods do not preclude the use of different sampling...

  20. A Brief History of Los Alamos National Laboratory, rev. 2 (Technical...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results? Save Share this Record Citation Formats MLA APA Chicago Bibtex Export Metadata Endnote Excel CSV XML Save to My ...

  1. Microsoft PowerPoint - ULTRA Annual Review Presentation-rev-7...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... and transmit to MIT Peer-reviewed publications ANIMMA 2013 Conference Paper IEEE Journal Paper "NEET In-Pile Ultrasonic Sensor Enablement-FY 2013 Status Report," ...

  2. Microsoft PowerPoint - Town Hall Slides 6-05-14 rev. 2

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Meeting Agenda * Opening Comments - Mayor Janway * Introductions Guidelines - Ben Williams (Moderator) * Overview of Week's Activities - Joe Franco * Update on Recovery...

  3. HLW Melter Control Strategy Without Visual Feedback VSL-12R2500-1 Rev 0

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kruger, A A.; Joseph, Innocent; Matlack, Keith S.; Callow, Richard A.; Abramowitz, Howard; Pegg, Ian L.; Brandys, Marek; Kot, Wing K.

    2012-11-13

    Plans for the treatment of high level waste (HL W) at the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) are based upon the inventory of the tank wastes, the anticipated performance of the pretreatment processes, and current understanding of the capability of the borosilicate glass waste form [I]. The WTP HLW melter design, unlike earlier DOE melter designs, incorporates an active glass bubbler system. The bubblers create active glass pool convection and thereby improve heat and mass transfer and increase glass melting rates. The WTP HLW melter has a glass surface area of 3.75 m{sup 2} and depth of ~ 1.1 m. The two melters in the HLW facility together are designed to produce up to 7.5 MT of glass per day at 100% availability. Further increases in HL W waste processing rates can potentially be achieved by increasing the melter operating temperature above 1150?C and by increasing the waste loading in the glass product. Increasing the waste loading also has the added benefit of decreasing the number of canisters for storage.

  4. Microsoft PowerPoint - Town Hall Slides 7-10-14 rev 0

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    to Phase II - July 1 * Phase I Recovery - Mitigation * Establishment of radiological buffer areas * Installation of CAM at Station B * Sealing of bypass dampers * Collection...

  5. Microsoft Word - 10PVSC_PVsim_rev31_CT edits_06 14 10_clean.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    The DAC captures the transducers' signals and calculates the inverter's DC and AC power. Since the inverter's performance will be evaluated using two different inputs, a fast...

  6. Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap Rev. 01

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) conducts R&D activities related to storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel and high level nuclear waste (for existing and future fuels); deep geologic disposal R&D activities are outlined and prioritized on the basis of gaps in understanding and benefit derived from R&D to narrow such gaps.

  7. RL-721 REV? I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Cultural sensitivity shall be determined using site location topographic maps qeoqraphic information svstem databases andor pedestrian surveys to identify Page 1 of 3...

  8. RL-721 REV7 I. Project Title: NEPA REVIEW SCREENING FORM Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    site location topographic maps, geographic information system databases, andor pedestrian surveys to identify proximity to cultural resources (i.e., historic buildings,...

  9. Microsoft Word - CONST Appendix SFA-1 (Rev. 4.1, 5-22-15).doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    .1, 5/22/15) Appendix SFA-1 Page 1 of 7 Appendix SFA-1 FAR & DEAR Clauses Incorporated By Reference (a) The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) clauses which are incorporated by reference herein shall have the same force and effect as if printed in full text. (b) Full text of the referenced clauses may be accessed electronically at website address: FAR: http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm DEAR:

  10. Microsoft Word - CONST Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 5.6, 5-29-15).doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6, 5/29/15) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 31 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Apr 2013) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  11. Microsoft Word - CP chng pckg Draft_Fact_Sheet_4-23-10 rev5.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Proposed Changes to the Tri-Party Agreement for Central Plateau Cleanup Work The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - the Tri-Party Agreement agencies - want your input on proposed changes to the Tri-Party Agreement (TPA). These proposed changes lay the framework for a comprehensive cleanup approach for Hanford's Central Plateau. Background The Hanford Site, managed by DOE, produced about 60 percent

  12. Microsoft Word - CPFFS Appendix SFA-1 (Rev. 7.1, 5-22-15).doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    .1, 5/22/15) Appendix SFA-1 Page 1 of 8 Appendix SFA-1 FAR & DEAR Clauses Incorporated By Reference (a) The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) clauses which are incorporated by reference herein shall have the same force and effect as if printed in full text. (b) Full text of the referenced clauses may be accessed electronically at the following website addresses: FAR: http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm DEAR:

  13. Microsoft Word - CPFFS Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 8.6, 5-29-15).doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6, 5/29/15) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2014) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Jan 2010) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  14. Microsoft Word - Class 1 New Permit Corrections- FINAL 122710 Rev 15.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DEC 3 0 7 r ,lO Mr. James Bearzi, Chief Hazardous Waste Bureau New Mexico Environment Department 2905 Rodeo Park Drive East, Building 1 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505-6303 Subject: Notification of a Class 1 Permit Modification to Permit Number NM4890139088- TSDF Dear Mr. Bearzi: Enclosed is a Class 1 Permit Modification Notification : * Editorial Corrections to the New Permit Issued November 30 , 2010 We certify under penalty of law that this document and the enclosure were prepared under our

  15. Microsoft Word - Class 1 PMN_7_Items_9_30_15_Rev. 13

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    SEP 3 0 2015 Mr. John E. Kieling, Chief Hazardous Waste Bureau New Mexico Environment Department 2905 Rodeo Park Drive East, Building 1 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505-6303 Subject: Class 1 Permit Modification Notifications to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Number: NM4890 139088-TSDF Dear Mr. Kieling: Enclosed is a Notification of Class 1 Permit Modifications for the following items: * Clarifications to Inspections of Liquid-Fueled Vehicles in Attachment E * Addition

  16. Microsoft Word - Class-1_Star and Class 1_PMN_12_18_15_Rev. 8

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221 Mr. John E. Kieling, Chief Hazardous Waste Bureau DEC 3 0 201 5 New Mexico Environment Department 2905 Rodeo Park Drive East, Building 1 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 Subject: Class 1* and Class 1 Permit Modification Notifications to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Number: NM4890139088-TSDF Dear Mr. Kieling: Enclosed is the following: Class 1* Permit Modification Notification * Revise Closure Schedule Dates in Attachment G, Section G-1 d(

  17. Microsoft Word - DomyCV_long_rev02-22-06_1.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, and Savannah River Ecology Laboratory Professional Vitae NAME: Domy C. Adriano DATE: January 15, 2006 adriano@srel.edu Executive Summary Professor Adriano has a distinguished professional career over a period of 40 years in agricultural and environmental sciences. He has demonstrated academic excellence since he was a high school student at San Ildefonso College (Tanay, Rizal,

  18. Microsoft Word - EFS Appendix SFA-1 (Rev. 6.1, 5-22-15).doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    .1, 5/22/15) Appendix SFA-1 Page 1 of 7 Appendix SFA-1 FAR & DEAR Clauses Incorporated By Reference (a) The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) clauses which are incorporated by reference herein shall have the same force and effect as if printed in full text. (b) Full text of the referenced clauses may be accessed electronically at website address: FAR: http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm DEAR:

  19. Microsoft Word - EFS Exhibit A General Conditions (Rev. 7.5, 5-29-15).doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5, 5/29/15) Exhibit A General Conditions Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GC Title Page GC-1 DEFINITIONS (Aug 2012) .......................................................................................................... 3 GC-2 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTICES (Apr 2013) ........................................................................................................................................... 3 GC-3 INDEPENDENT

  20. Microsoft Word - FFLF Wind Project EA 11 Feb 2010 rev4 FINAL FA.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    37 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE'S PROPOSED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO PENNSYLVANIA FOR FREY FARM LANDFILL WIND ENERGY PROJECT MANOR TOWNSHIP LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory February 2010 DOE/EA-1737 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE'S PROPOSED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO PENNSYLVANIA FOR FREY FARM LANDFILL WIND ENERGY PROJECT MANOR TOWNSHIP LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory February