Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2013...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

resulted in energy intensity being overestimated for nearly all years. April 2014 U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2013 and Prior...

2

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) Each year since 1996, EIA's Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting has produced a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the projections included in previous editions of the AEO. Each year, the comparison adds the projections from the most recent AEO and updates the historical data to the most recently available. The comparison summarizes the relationship of the AEO reference case projections since 1982 to realized outcomes by calculating the average absolute percent differences for several of the major variables for AEO82 through AEO2006. Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review, 2006 Report

3

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8) 8) Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2008) Each year since 1996, EIA's Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting has produced a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the projections included in previous editions of the AEO. Each year, the comparison adds the projections from the most recent AEO and updates the historical data to the most recently available. The comparison summarizes the relationship of the AEO reference case projections since 1982 to realized outcomes by calculating the average absolute percent differences for several of the major variables for AEO82 through AEO2008. Annual Energy Outlook Restrospective Review, 2008 Report Revisions to Gross Domestic Product and Implications for the Comparisons

4

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9) 9) Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2009) Each year since 1996, EIA's Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting has produced a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the projections included in previous editions of the AEO. Each year, the comparison adds the projections from the most recent AEO and updates the historical data to the most recently available. The comparison summarizes the relationship of the AEO reference case projections since 1982 to realized outcomes by calculating the average absolute percent differences for several of the major variables for AEO82 through AEO2009. Annual Energy Outlook Restrospective Review, 2009 Report pdf images Table 1. Comparison of Absolute Percent Difference between AEO Reference Case Projections

5

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections March 2012 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections i This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or

6

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Evaluation of Projections in  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)* Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)* The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies used. The projections are business-as-usual trend projections, given known technology, technological and demographic trends, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations or appropriation of funds that are not provided or specified in the legislation itself-are not reflected in the projections, although there are a few exceptions. It is assumed that current laws and regulations that have sunset dates, but which are regularly renewed, are extended for modeling purposes. Thus, the AEO generally provides a policy-neutral reference case that can be used to analyze policy initiatives. While the analyses in the AEO focus primarily on a reference case, lower and higher economic growth cases, and lower and higher energy price cases; more than 30 alternative cases are generally included in the AEO. Readers are encouraged to review the full range of cases, which address many of the uncertainties inherent in long-term projections.

7

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review - Energy Information  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections Release Date: March 16, 2012 | Next Release Date: March 2013 | Report Number: DOE/EIA-0640(2011) The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy production, consumption and prices each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). Each year, EIA also produces this AEO Retrospective Review document, which presents a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the Reference case projections included in previous editions of the AEO. The purpose of the AEO Retrospective is to demonstrate how the AEO projections have tracked actual energy indicators, enable trend analysis, and inform discussions of potential improvements to the AEO. The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of

8

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review - Energy Information  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2012 and Prior Reference Case AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2012 and Prior Reference Case Projections Release Date: March 15, 2013 | Next Release Date: March 2014 | Report Number: DOE/EIA-0640(2012) The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy production, consumption and prices each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). Each year, EIA also produces an AEO Retrospective Review document, which presents a comparison between realized energy outcomes and the Reference case projections included in previous editions of the AEO. The purpose of the Retrospective is to show the relationship between past AEO projections and actual energy indicators, enable trend analysis, and inform discussions of potential improvements to the AEO. The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of

9

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review  

Reports and Publications (EIA)

The Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review provides a yearly comparison between realized energy outcomes and the Reference case projections included in previous Annual Energy Outlooks (AEO) beginning with 1982. This edition of the report adds the AEO 2012 projections and updates the historical data to incorporate the latest data revisions.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Evaluation of Projections in  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8) 8) The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies used. The projections are business-as-usual trend projections, given known technology, technological and demographic trends, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations or appropriation of funds that are not provided or specified in the legislation itself-are not reflected in the projections. The AEO is based on only then current Federal and State laws and regulations. Thus, the AEO provides a policy-neutral reference case that can be used to analyze policy initiatives. The analyses in the AEO primarily focuses on a reference case, lower and higher economic growth cases, and lower and higher energy price cases. However, more than 30 alternative cases are generally included in the AEO. Readers are encouraged to review the full range of cases, which address many of the uncertainties inherent in long-term projections.

11

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Evaluation of Projections in  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9) 9) The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies. The Reference case projection assumes trends that are consistent with historical and current market behavior, technological and demographic changes, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations or appropriation of funds that are not provided or specified in the legislation itself-are not reflected in the projections. Thus, the AEO Reference case provides an impartial baseline that can be used to analyze potential new policies or legislative initiatives. The analysis in the AEO primarily focuses on a Reference case, lower and higher economic growth cases, and lower and higher oil price cases. However, approximately 30 alternative cases are generally included in the AEO. Readers are encouraged to review the full range of cases, which address many of the uncertainties inherent in long-term projections.

12

Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Request for information on reducing regulatory burden, E.O. 13563...

13

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 2014 FINAL More Documents & Publications DOE...

14

Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review 1 Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006) * The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies used. The projections are business-as-usual trend projections, given known technology, technological and demographic trends, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and standards-or of sections of legislation that have been enacted but that require implementing regulations

15

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE 13563 and ICR Report - Final.pdf...

16

Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Outlook 2008 Retrospective Review  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

S e p t e mb e r 2 0 0 8 S e p t e mb e r 2 0 0 8 N e x t R e l e a s e D a t e : S e p t e mb e r 2 0 0 9 Energy Information Administration / Annual Energy Outlook 2008 Retrospective Review 1 Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2008) The Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy supply and demand each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). The projections in the AEO are not statements of what will happen but of what might happen, given the assumptions and methodologies used. The projections are business-as-usual trend projections, given known technology, technological and demographic trends, and current laws and regulations. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation, regulations, and

17

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

- December 18, 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE EO 13563 December 2012 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts...

18

Reducing Regulatory Burden - EO 13563 Retrospective Review |...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy: Recommendations to the NRC Committee on Research...

19

DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report May 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 May2012 ReportDOE525.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden...

20

Retrospective Evaluation of Appliance Price Trends  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Evaluation of Appliance Price Trends Evaluation of Appliance Price Trends Title Retrospective Evaluation of Appliance Price Trends Publication Type Journal Article Year of Publication 2009 Authors Dale, Larry L., Camille Antinori, Michael A. McNeil, James E. McMahon, and Sydny K. Fujita Journal Energy Policy Volume 37 Issue 2 Pagination 597-605 Date Published November 20 Keywords appliance efficiency standards, price forecasts, EES-EG Abstract Real prices of major appliances (refrigerators, dishwashers, heating and cooling equipment) have been falling since the late 1970s despite increases in appliance efficiency and other quality variables. This paper demonstrates that historic increases in efficiency over time, including those resulting from minimum efficiency standards, incur smaller price increases than were expected by the Department of Energy (DOE) forecasts made in conjunction with standards. This effect can be explained by technological innovation, which lowers the cost of efficiency, and by market changes contributing to lower markups and economies of scale in production of higher efficiency units. We reach four principal conclusions about appliance trends and retail price setting:1. For the past several decades, the retail price of appliances has been steadily falling while efficiency has been increasing.2. Past retail price predictions made by the DOE analyses of efficiency standards, assuming constant prices over time, have tended to overestimate retail prices.3. The average incremental price to increase appliance efficiency has declined over time. DOE technical support documents have typically overestimated this incremental price and retail prices.4. Changes in retail markups and economies of scale in production of more efficient appliances may have contributed to declines in prices of efficient appliances.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D...

22

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review Table 2. Summary of the number o fover-estimated results between AEO Reference cases and realized Outcomes All AEOs NEMS AEOs Percent of Projections Over-Estimated Percent of Projections Over-Estimated Table 3. Gross Domestic Product, (Average Cumulative Growth) Actual vs. Projected 24% 37% Table 4. World Oil Prices, Actual vs. Projected 52% 24% Table 5. Total Petroleum Consumption, Actual vs. Projected 44% 61% Table 6. Domestic Crude Oil Production, Actual vs. Projected 59% 65% Table 7. Petroleum Net Imports, Actual vs. Projected 56% 61% Table 8. Natural Gas Wellhead Prices, Actual vs. Projected 54% 23% Table 9. Total Natural Gas Consumption, Actual vs. Projected

23

Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investment in Photovoltaic Energy Systems  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investment in Photovoltaic Energy Systems, a report from the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

24

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 15, 2013 February 15, 2013 Agency/ Sub- agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/GC N/A Request for information on reducing regulatory burden DOE is continually engaging in review of its rules to determine whether there are burdens on the public that can be avoided by amending or rescinding existing requirements. To that end, while DOE is always open to receiving information about the impact of its regulations, it published this RFI to solicit public input. August 8, 2012 (77 FR 47328) This information solicitation is expected

25

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Retrospective Review Retrospective Review 4 Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review Table 1. Comparison of absolute percent difference between AEO reference case projections and related outcomes Variable All AEOs (AEO82 to AEO2010) NEMS AEOs (AEO94 to AEO2010) Gross Domestic Product Real Gross Domestic Product (Growth Rate)* 0.8 0.9 Petroleum World Oil Prices 49.9 31.4 Total Petroleum Consumption 4.1 4.3 Crude Oil Production 5.8 6.4 Petroleum Net Imports 6.0 7.3 Natural Gas Natural Gas Wellhead Prices 56.6 31.9 Total Natural Gas Consumption 7.3 7.4 Natural Gas Production 6.2 6.9 Natural Gas Net Imports 17.9 17.1 Coal Coal Prices to Electric Generating Plants** 43.1 19.5 Total Coal Consumption 4.9 6.0 Coal Production 4.8 4.5 Electricity Average Electricity Prices 19.7 12.0 Total Electricity Sales 3.0 3.8 Total Energy, Carbon and Intensity

26

The American Board of Radiology Holman Research Pathway: 10-Year Retrospective Review of the Program and Participant Performance  

SciTech Connect

Introduction: In 1999, the American Board of Radiology (ABR) implemented an innovative training program track in diagnostic radiology (DR) and radiation oncology (RO) designed to stimulate development of a cadre of future academic researchers and educators in the 2 disciplines. The program was designated the Holman Research Pathway (HRP). An in-depth retrospective review of initial certification examination performance, post-training career choices, and academic productivity has not been written. This report represents a 10-year retrospective review of post-training performance of a cohort of trainees who have had sufficient time to complete their training and initial certification process and to enter practice. Methods and Materials: All pertinent proceedings of the ABR and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Residency Review Committees for DR and RO between 1997 and May 2011 were reviewed. Thirty-four HRP candidates who fulfilled the established evaluation criteria were identified, and their ABR data files were analyzed regarding performance on the qualifying and certifying examinations. All candidates were contacted directly to obtain a current curriculum vitae. Results: Twenty candidates in RO and 14 candidates in DR were identifiable for review. All candidates attained initial certification. At the time of analysis, 23 of 33 (66.6%) candidates were employed in full-time academic practice (1 DR candidate remained in a fellowship and was not evaluated regarding employment status). Fifteen of 20 (75%) RO candidates were in faculty positions compared with 7 of 13 (53.8%) DR trainees. Additional academic productivity metrics are reported. Conclusions: A high percentage of HRP trainees remained in academic practice and demonstrated significant academic productivity as measured by manuscript authorship and research support. Additional time and observation will be needed to determine whether these findings will be sustained by past, current, and future HRP trainees.

Wallner, Paul E., E-mail: pwallner@theabr.org [21st Century Oncology, LLC, Fort Myers, Florida, and American Board of Radiology, Tucson, Arizona (United States); Ang, K. Kian [University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States)] [University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States); Zietman, Anthony L. [Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)] [Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (United States); Harris, Jay R. [Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)] [Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (United States); Ibbott, Geoffrey S. [University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States)] [University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States); Mahoney, Mary C. [University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (United States)] [University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (United States); Mezwa, Duane G. [Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oaks, Michigan (United States)] [Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oaks, Michigan (United States); Wilson, Lynn D. [Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (United States)] [Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (United States); Becker, Gary J. [American Board of Radiology, Tucson, Arizona (United States)] [American Board of Radiology, Tucson, Arizona (United States)

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

27

Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments: Impacts of a Cluster of Energy Technologies, August 2010.

28

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

This is a report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit of the Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy.

29

Retrospective review of Contura HDR breast cases to improve our standardized procedure  

SciTech Connect

To retrospectively review our first 20 Contura high dose rate breast cases to improve and refine our standardized procedure and checklists. We prepared in advance checklists for all steps, developed an in-house Excel spreadsheet for second checking the plan, and generated a procedure for efficient contouring and a set of optimization constraints to meet the dose volume histogram criteria. Templates were created in our treatment planning system for structures, isodose levels, optimization constraints, and plan report. This study reviews our first 20 high dose rate Contura breast treatment plans. We followed our standardized procedure for contouring, planning, and second checking. The established dose volume histogram criteria were successfully met for all plans. For the cases studied here, the balloon-skin and balloon-ribs distances ranged between 5 and 43 mm and 1 and 33 mm, respectively; air{sub s}eroma volume/PTV{sub E}val volume?5.5% (allowed?10%); asymmetry<1.2 mm (goal?2 mm); PTV{sub E}val V90%?97.6%; PTV{sub E}val V95%?94.9%; skin max dose?98%Rx; ribs max dose?137%Rx; V150%?29.8 cc; V200%?7.8 cc; the total dwell time range was 225.4 to 401.9 seconds; and the second check agreement was within 3%. Based on this analysis, more appropriate ranges for the total dwell time and balloon diameter tolerance were found. Three major problems were encountered: balloon migration toward the skin for small balloon-to-skin distances, lumen obstruction, and length change for the flexible balloon. Solutions were found for these issues and our standardized procedure and checklists were updated accordingly. Based on our review of these cases, the use of checklists resulted in consistent results, indicating good coverage for the target without sacrificing the critical structures. This review helped us to refine our standardized procedure and update our checklists.

Iftimia, Ileana, E-mail: Ileana.n.iftimia@lahey.org [Lahey Clinic, Radiation Oncology Department, MA (United States); Cirino, Eileen T.; Ladd, Ron; Mower, Herbert W.; McKee, Andrea B. [Lahey Clinic, Radiation Oncology Department, MA (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

30

PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report from the Peer Review Panel Report from the Peer Review Panel on activities within the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit Office of Planning, Budget and Analysis Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Team Members: Kathryn Newcomer, The George Washington University (Chair) Irwin Feller, The Pennsylvania State University (Retired) Stephanie Shipman, Government Accountability Office Kathleen Sedlak O'Brien, Environmental Protection Agency Faith Lambert, EERE Final Report February 1, 2008 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) within the U.S. Department of Energy asked a panel of experts with relevant knowledge to review the evaluation activities of the Planning, Analysis and Evaluation Unit (PAE) within EERE's Office of Planning, Budget and

31

Retrospective review of thoracic neural damage during lung ablation - what the interventional radiologist needs to know about neural thoracic anatomy  

SciTech Connect

Background and Purpose: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is associated with low neural morbidity compared with surgery, which commonly causes debilitating long-term pain. The purpose was to review the thoracic neural anatomy relevant to percutaneous RFA and to retrospectively review symptomatic nerve injury after lung RFA at our institution. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively examined all symptomatic nerve injuries occurring after computed tomography (CT)-guided RFA treatment of lung tumors for 462 patients/509 procedures/708 lesions treated at our large tertiary referral centre during 10 years. Results: Eight patients experienced neurological complications after heating during the RFA procedure. These complications occurred in the phrenic (n = 1), brachial (n = 3), left recurrent (n = 1), and intercostal nerves (n = 2) and the stellate ganglion (n = 1). Three were grade 2, four grade 3 and one grade 4 injuries (CTCAE v3). Conclusion: Although rare, neurological complications can occur after RFA, and they can occasionally be severe. To prevent these complications, it is important for the interventional radiologist to be aware of the anatomy of nervous structures and to attempt to identify nerves on CT scans during the RFA procedure. Creating a pneumothorax can be useful to avoid nerve damage and related clinical complications.

Palussiere, Jean, E-mail: j.palussiere@bordeaux.unicancer.fr [Institut Bergonie, Department of Interventional Radiology (France)] [Institut Bergonie, Department of Interventional Radiology (France); Canella, Mathieu [Centre Hospitalier Pau, Department of Radiology (France)] [Centre Hospitalier Pau, Department of Radiology (France); Cornelis, Francois; Catena, Vittorio; Descat, Edouard [Institut Bergonie, Department of Interventional Radiology (France)] [Institut Bergonie, Department of Interventional Radiology (France); Brouste, Veronique [Institut Bergonie, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit (France)] [Institut Bergonie, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit (France); Montaudon, Michel [CHU Haut Leveque, Department of Radiology (France)] [CHU Haut Leveque, Department of Radiology (France)

2013-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

32

Caries Incidence in Healthy Siblings of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Retrospective Chart Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

dental practice in Coppell, Texas that treats autistic children and their siblings. Forty-five charts of healthy siblings of children with ASD and 43 charts of age-matched, healthy-healthy sibling pairs were reviewed. The number of decayed, missing...

Zarrabi, Sameen

2013-12-10T23:59:59.000Z

33

Classroom Evaluation of a Scaffolding Intervention for Improving Peer Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Classroom Evaluation of a Scaffolding Intervention for Improving Peer Review Localization Huy, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Abstract. A peer review system that automatically evaluates student feedback comments first drafts were both reviewed by peers. During peer review, the system automatically analyzed

Litman, Diane J.

34

Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Publications Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Reports These reports summarize the comments of expert peer...

35

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Advanced Vehicle Testing & Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Intertek at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about testing and evaluating advanced...

36

ISRP 2005-14: Retrospective Report -Appendix Appendix. The Evolution of Scientific Review in the Fish and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to include peer review in the operating policies of federal funding agencies and the need for other reforms

37

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3 3 Table 8. Natural Gas Wellhead Prices, Actual vs. Forecasts (current dollars per thousand cubic feet) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 4.32 5.47 6.67 7.51 8.04 8.57 AEO 1983 2.93 3.11 3.46 3.93 4.56 5.26 12.74 AEO 1984 2.77 2.90 3.21 3.63 4.13 4.79 9.33 AEO 1985 2.60 2.61 2.66 2.71 2.94 3.35 3.85 4.46 5.10 5.83 6.67 AEO 1986 1.73 1.96 2.29 2.54 2.81 3.15 3.73 4.34 5.06 5.90 6.79 7.70 8.62 9.68 10.80 AEO 1987 1.83 1.95 2.11 2.28 2.49 2.72 3.08 3.51 4.07 7.54 AEO 1989* 1.62 1.70 1.91 2.13 2.58 3.04 3.48 3.93 4.76 5.23 5.80 6.43 6.98 AEO 1990 1.78 1.88 2.93 5.36 9.15 AEO 1991 1.77 1.90 2.11 2.30 2.42 2.51 2.60 2.74 2.91 3.29 3.75 4.31 5.07 5.77 6.45 7.29 AEO 1992 1.69 1.85 2.03 2.15 2.35 2.51 2.74 3.01 3.40 3.81 4.24 4.74 5.25 5.78 6.37 AEO 1993 1.85 1.94 2.09 2.30 2.44 2.60 2.85 3.12 3.47 3.84 4.31 4.81 5.28 5.68

38

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6 6 Table 11. Natural Gas Net Imports, Actual vs. Forecasts (trillion cubic feet) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 AEO 1983 1.08 1.16 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 AEO 1984 0.99 1.05 1.16 1.27 1.43 1.57 2.11 AEO 1985 0.94 1.00 1.19 1.45 1.58 1.86 1.94 2.06 2.17 2.32 2.44 AEO 1986 0.74 0.88 0.62 1.03 1.05 1.27 1.39 1.47 1.66 1.79 1.96 2.17 2.38 2.42 2.43 AEO 1987 0.84 0.89 1.07 1.16 1.26 1.36 1.46 1.65 1.75 2.50 AEO 1989* 1.15 1.32 1.44 1.52 1.61 1.70 1.79 1.87 1.98 2.06 2.15 2.23 2.31 AEO 1990 1.26 1.43 2.07 2.68 2.95 AEO 1991 1.36 1.53 1.70 1.82 2.11 2.30 2.33 2.36 2.42 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.75 2.83 2.90 2.95 AEO 1992 1.48 1.62 1.88 2.08 2.25 2.41 2.56 2.68 2.70 2.72 2.76 2.84 2.92 3.05 3.10 AEO 1993 1.79 2.08 2.35 2.49 2.61 2.74 2.89 2.95 3.00 3.05 3.10 3.17 3.29 3.42 AEO 1994 2.02 2.40 2.66 2.74

39

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 5 Table 1. Summary of Differences between AEO Reference Cases and Realized Outcomes Percent Over- Estimated Average Absolute Percent Difference Percent Over- Estimated Average Absolute Percent Difference Table 3. Gross Domestic Product, Actual vs. Forecasts 34% 5.5% 18% 4.5% Table 4. World Oil Prices, Actual vs. Forecasts 68% 52.9% 36% 20.8% Table 5. Total Petroleum Consumption, Actual vs. Forecasts 31% 2.9% 44% 1.8% Table 6. Domestic Crude Oil Production, Actual vs. Forecasts 51% 4.9% 53% 5.2% Table 7. Petroleum Net Imports, Actual vs. Forecasts 49% 6.4% 51% 3.6% Table 8. Natural Gas Wellhead Prices, Actual vs. Forecasts 61% 63.5% 23% 28.9% Table 9. Total Natural Gas Consumption, Actual vs. Forecasts 38% 6.7% 59% 5.6% Table 10. Natural Gas Production, Actual vs. Forecasts 51% 5.5% 70% 5.8%

40

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3 3 Table 18. Total Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Actual vs. Forecasts (million metric tons) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 AEO 1983 AEO 1984 AEO 1985 AEO 1986 AEO 1987 AEO 1989* AEO 1990 AEO 1991 AEO 1992 AEO 1993 5009 5053 5130 5207 5269 5335 5401 5449 5504 5562 5621 5672 5724 5771 AEO 1994 5060 5130 5185 5240 5287 5335 5379 5438 5482 5529 5599 5658 5694 AEO 1995 5137 5174 5188 5262 5309 5361 5394 5441 5489 5551 5621 5680 AEO 1996 5182 5224 5295 5355 5417 5464 5525 5589 5660 5735 5812 AEO 1997 5295 5381 5491 5586 5658 5715 5781 5863 5934 6009 AEO 1998 5474 5621 5711 5784 5893 5957 6026 6098 6192 AEO 1999 5522 5689 5810 5913 5976 6036 6084 6152 AEO 2000 5573 5692 5777 5865 5971 6078 6172 AEO 2001 5630 5781 5909 6023 6114 6197 AEO 2002 5723 5808 5981 6095 6210 AEO 2003 5633 5749 5856 5954 AEO 2004 5743 5826

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9 9 Table 14. Coal Production, Actual vs. Forecasts (million short tons) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 914 939 963 995 1031 1080 AEO 1983 900 926 947 974 1010 1045 1191 AEO 1984 899 921 948 974 1010 1057 1221 AEO 1985 886 909 930 940 958 985 1015 1041 1072 1094 1116 AEO 1986 890 920 954 962 983 1017 1044 1073 1097 1126 1142 1156 1176 1191 1217 AEO 1987 917 914 932 962 978 996 1020 1043 1068 1149 AEO 1989* 941 946 977 990 1018 1039 1058 1082 1084 1107 1130 1152 1171 AEO 1990 973 987 1085 1178 1379 AEO 1991 1035 1002 1016 1031 1043 1054 1065 1079 1096 1111 1133 1142 1160 1193 1234 1272 AEO 1992 1004 1040 1019 1034 1052 1064 1074 1087 1102 1133 1144 1156 1173 1201 1229 AEO 1993 1039 1043 1054 1065 1076 1086 1094 1102 1125 1136 1148 1161 1178 1204 AEO 1994 999 1021 1041 1051 1056 1066 1073 1081 1087 1098 1107 1122 1121 AEO 1995

42

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 4 Table 9. Total Natural Gas Consumption, Actual vs. Forecasts (trillion cubic feet) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 15.93 15.72 15.72 16.08 16.59 17.08 AEO 1983 17.75 17.63 17.57 17.75 17.76 17.77 16.95 AEO 1984 18.22 18.07 18.33 18.61 18.73 18.76 18.75 AEO 1985 17.79 17.80 17.89 18.30 18.58 18.71 18.79 18.88 18.82 18.82 18.81 AEO 1986 16.52 16.83 17.35 17.27 17.50 17.77 17.77 17.90 18.01 18.04 18.03 18.26 18.34 18.04 17.92 AEO 1987 16.85 16.93 17.24 17.27 17.34 17.43 17.66 18.02 18.31 19.65 AEO 1989* 17.75 17.95 17.94 18.08 18.10 18.34 18.68 18.94 19.17 19.55 19.86 19.98 20.29 AEO 1990 18.34 18.66 20.69 22.88 22.72 AEO 1991 18.53 19.21 19.34 19.56 19.76 20.01 20.21 20.66 20.93 21.23 21.64 22.03 22.33 22.35 22.32 22.27 AEO 1992 18.79 19.36 19.84 20.08 20.53 20.68 21.12 21.42 21.66 21.89 22.23

43

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 4 Table 19. Energy Intensity, Actual vs. Forecasts (quadrillion Btu / $Billion Nominal GDP) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 20.1 18.5 16.9 15.5 14.4 13.2 AEO 1983 19.9 18.6 17.4 16.2 15.1 14.0 9.6 AEO 1984 20.1 18.9 17.7 16.5 15.5 14.5 10.3 AEO 1985 20.0 19.1 18.0 16.9 15.9 14.7 13.7 12.7 11.8 11.1 10.3 AEO 1986 18.3 17.8 16.8 16.1 15.2 14.3 13.5 12.6 11.8 11.0 10.3 9.6 8.8 8.2 7.7 AEO 1987 17.6 17.0 16.3 15.4 14.5 13.8 13.0 12.2 11.5 8.2 AEO 1989* 16.9 16.2 15.2 14.2 13.3 12.5 11.7 11.0 10.4 9.7 9.0 8.4 8.0 AEO 1990 16.1 15.4 11.7 8.6 6.4 AEO 1991 15.5 14.9 14.2 13.6 13.0 12.5 11.9 11.3 10.8 10.3 9.7 9.2 8.7 8.3 7.9 7.4 AEO 1992 15.0 14.5 13.9 13.3 12.7 12.1 11.6 11.0 10.5 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.6 8.1 7.7 AEO 1993 14.7 13.9 13.4 12.8 12.3 11.8 11.2 10.7 10.2 9.6 9.2 8.7 8.3 7.8 AEO 1994 14.1 13.5 13.1 12.6 12.1 11.6 11.1 10.6

44

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 Table 15. Average Electricity Prices, Actual vs. Forecasts (nominal cents per kilowatt-hour) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 6.38 6.96 7.63 8.23 8.83 9.49 AEO 1983 6.85 7.28 7.74 8.22 8.68 9.18 13.12 AEO 1984 6.67 7.05 7.48 7.89 8.25 8.65 11.53 AEO 1985 6.62 6.94 7.32 7.63 7.89 8.15 8.46 8.85 9.20 9.61 10.04 AEO 1986 6.67 6.88 7.05 7.18 7.35 7.52 7.65 7.87 8.31 8.83 9.41 10.01 10.61 11.33 12.02 AEO 1987 6.63 6.65 6.92 7.12 7.38 7.62 7.94 8.36 8.86 11.99 AEO 1989* 6.50 6.75 7.14 7.48 7.82 8.11 8.50 8.91 9.39 9.91 10.49 11.05 11.61 AEO 1990 6.49 6.72 8.40 10.99 14.47 AEO 1991 6.94 7.31 7.59 7.82 8.18 8.38 8.54 8.73 8.99 9.38 9.83 10.29 10.83 11.36 11.94 12.58 AEO 1992 6.97 7.16 7.32 7.56 7.78 8.04 8.29 8.57 8.93 9.38 9.82 10.26 10.73 11.25 11.83 AEO 1993 7.18 7.36 7.54 7.77 7.99 8.27 8.54 8.89 9.33 9.72 10.14

45

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8 8 Table 13. Total Coal Consumption, Actual vs. Forecasts (million short tons) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 805 825 843 868 896 936 AEO 1983 807 831 848 870 899 928 1061 AEO 1984 843 848 866 889 919 958 1110 AEO 1985 818 833 842 853 867 891 918 943 970 989 1008 AEO 1986 813 831 860 870 888 919 945 972 995 1021 1038 1051 1069 1083 1105 AEO 1987 837 837 854 879 896 912 932 954 975 1059 AEO 1989* 872 882 894 903 927 947 965 987 990 1006 1026 1045 1062 AEO 1990 884 893 984 1049 1207 AEO 1991 893 902 918 932 943 948 962 973 984 991 1003 1003 1011 1030 1056 1078 AEO 1992 905 934 919 925 934 944 953 961 971 993 1003 1011 1020 1037 1055 AEO 1993 929 931 940 947 958 965 970 972 987 997 1004 1010 1018 1032 AEO 1994 920 928 933 938 943 948 953 958 962 967 978 990 987 AEO 1995 935 940 941 947 948 951 954 958 963 971 984 992 AEO 1996 937 942 954 962 983

46

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 5 Table 10. Natural Gas Production, Actual vs. Forecasts (trillion cubic feet) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 14.74 14.26 14.33 14.89 15.39 15.88 AEO 1983 16.48 16.27 16.20 16.31 16.27 16.29 14.89 AEO 1984 17.48 17.10 17.44 17.58 17.52 17.32 16.39 AEO 1985 16.95 17.08 17.11 17.29 17.40 17.33 17.32 17.27 17.05 16.80 16.50 AEO 1986 16.30 16.27 17.15 16.68 16.90 16.97 16.87 16.93 16.86 16.62 16.40 16.33 16.57 16.23 16.12 AEO 1987 16.21 16.09 16.38 16.32 16.30 16.30 16.44 16.62 16.81 17.39 AEO 1989* 16.71 16.71 16.94 17.01 16.83 17.09 17.35 17.54 17.67 17.98 18.20 18.25 18.49 AEO 1990 16.91 17.25 18.84 20.58 20.24 AEO 1991 17.40 17.48 18.11 18.22 18.15 18.22 18.39 18.82 19.03 19.28 19.62 19.89 20.13 20.07 19.95 19.82 AEO 1992 17.43 17.69 17.95 18.00 18.29 18.27 18.51 18.75 18.97 19.19 19.48 19.78

47

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8 8 Table 3. Gross Domestic Product, Actual vs. Forecasts (Nominal $Billions) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO82 3,939 4,306 4,733 5,201 5,712 6,288 AEO83 3,919 4,264 4,650 5,086 5,549 6,053 9,362 AEO84 3,910 4,191 4,589 5,031 5,490 5,979 9,098 AEO85 3,882 4,103 4,436 4,793 5,207 5,658 6,158 6,702 7,252 7,836 8,486 AEO86 4,203 4,434 4,741 5,015 5,371 5,795 6,244 6,726 7,270 7,875 8,524 9,226 9,973 10,764 11,600 AEO87 4,483 4,701 5,035 5,389 5,773 6,190 6,666 7,175 7,716 11,223 AEO89* 4,857 5,182 5,575 6,013 6,483 6,987 7,525 8,106 8,756 9,400 10,103 10,863 11,632 AEO90 5,236 5,550 7,882 11,329 16,111 AEO91 5,457 5,695 6,078 6,399 6,738 7,145 7,607 8,099

48

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 1 Table 16. Total Electricity Sales, Actual vs. Forecasts (billion kilowatt-hours) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 2364 2454 2534 2626 2708 2811 AEO 1983 2318 2395 2476 2565 2650 2739 3153 AEO 1984 2321 2376 2461 2551 2637 2738 3182 AEO 1985 2317 2360 2427 2491 2570 2651 2730 2808 2879 2949 3026 AEO 1986 2363 2416 2479 2533 2608 2706 2798 2883 2966 3048 3116 3185 3255 3324 3397 AEO 1987 2460 2494 2555 2622 2683 2748 2823 2902 2977 3363 AEO 1989* 2556 2619 2689 2760 2835 2917 2994 3072 3156 3236 3313 3394 3473 AEO 1990 2612 2689 3083 3488 3870 AEO 1991 2700 2762 2806 2855 2904 2959 3022 3088 3151 3214 3282 3355 3427 3496 3563 3632 AEO 1992 2746 2845 2858 2913 2975 3030 3087 3146 3209 3276 3345 3415 3483 3552 3625 AEO 1993 2803 2840 2893 2946 2998 3052 3104 3157 3214 3271 3327 3383 3438 3491 AEO 1994 2843 2891 2928

49

Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of Projections in Past Editions (1982-2006)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 Table 5. Total Petroleum Consumption, Actual vs. Forecasts (million barrels per day) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 AEO 1982 18.00 17.89 17.55 17.24 16.98 16.99 AEO 1983 15.82 16.13 16.37 16.50 16.56 16.63 17.37 AEO 1984 15.77 15.76 16.01 16.27 16.48 16.74 18.00 AEO 1985 15.72 15.74 15.97 16.01 16.06 16.08 16.18 16.23 16.32 16.36 16.53 AEO 1986 16.07 16.29 16.05 16.07 16.15 16.31 16.37 16.42 16.44 16.46 16.50 16.64 16.80 17.21 17.38 AEO 1987 16.52 16.66 16.96 17.06 17.29 17.56 17.73 17.76 17.72 18.30 AEO 1989* 17.01 17.20 17.44 17.57 17.72 17.76 17.78 17.82 18.05 18.12 18.19 18.40 18.61 AEO 1990

50

Osha`s 1974 vinyl chloride standard. Retrospective evaluation of the rulemaking`s feasibility/impact estimates. Case study  

SciTech Connect

This report documents a case study of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration`s (OSHA) permanent health standard of 1974 for workplace exposures to vinyl chloride (monomer). OSHA`s assessment of hazard control options and estimates of compliance costs and other regulatory impacts prepared as part of the rationale for the rulemaking are reviewed and then compared and contrasted with the actual post-promulgation outcomes as affected industries adjusted to the new compliance requirements. This case study has been prepared as part of a larger Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) evaluation of the control technology and regulatory impact analyses that OSHA prepares to support its rulemakings. Congress requested in May 1992 that OTA examine OSHA`s procedures and methods in these regards. The case reported here is one of eight OSHA health and safety standards that have been similarly studied on a pre- and post-promulgation basis.

Boroush, M.A.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Peer Review As part of the overall evaluation process for faculty members, standing peer review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Peer Review As part of the overall evaluation process for faculty members, standing peer review, scholarship, and service. Peer review committees may be established at the discipline and/or at the division level (interdisciplinary). Peer review committees will consist of at least five tenured faculty members

Gering, Jon C.

52

Evaluating Topic-Word Review Analysis for Understanding Student Peer Review Performance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Evaluating Topic-Word Review Analysis for Understanding Student Peer Review Performance Wenting of an application based on the topic terms. Previ- ously, we proposed RevExplore, an interactive peer-review analytic tool that supports teachers in making sense of large volumes of student peer reviews. To better

Litman, Diane J.

53

Annual Merit Review Evaluates Impact of Sustainable Transportation...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

one of many that is being evaluated at the Vehicle Technologies Office and Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting this week. | Photo by...

54

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: In-Vehicle Evaluation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In-Vehicle Evaluation of Lower-Energy Energy Storage System (LEESS) Devices Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: In-Vehicle Evaluation of Lower-Energy Energy Storage...

55

Using a Mental Measurements Yearbook Review to Evaluate a Test  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 Using a Mental Measurements Yearbook Review to Evaluate a Test Anthony J. Nitko Professor, University of Arizona Introduction Once you have located a test, you will want to read its Mental Measurements Yearbook (MMY) review. You need to use the review to make judgments about the quality of the test

Abolmaesumi, Purang

56

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy among obesity patients in the northern west bank: a retrospective records review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Conservative methods for weight loss are usually disappointing. Therefore, surgeries such as Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) should be considered. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes (body mass index; BMI)...

Hamzeh Al Zabadi; Ahmad Daqour; Abdullah Hawari; Jihad Hasouni

2014-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

Application Review Evaluation Workforce Planning | 408-924-2250  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Application Review Evaluation Workforce Planning | 408-924-2250 HR: 5/2/2013 Instructions: Fill out one form for each application referred by Workforce Planning. Use the pre-approved screening criteria

Eirinaki, Magdalini

58

U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Performance Evaluation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Addendum A Addendum A U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Performance Evaluation Fiscal Year 2005 The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board The Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act nuclear fuel and defense high-level radioactive waste. The Act also estab lished the U.S. Nuclear Waste

59

Annual Merit Review Evaluates Impact of Sustainable Transportation Projects  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

More than 300 Energy Department activities and projects will be judged by reviewers from a variety of scientific backgrounds this week at the Vehicle Technologies Office and Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting in Washington, D.C., which is free of charge and open to the public.

60

To: SJSU Students From: Student Evaluation Review Board (SERB)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

To: SJSU Students From: Student Evaluation Review Board (SERB) James Lee, CASA (Chair, IEA Chang Kim, H&A Mykel Jeffrey, Student Rachael French, Science Iris Quan, Business for Institutional Effectiveness & Analytics (IEA) Subject: Changes to Teaching Evaluation Policies ­ Spring

Eirinaki, Magdalini

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Evaluation of System Level Modeling for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Summary - System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools for Hanford More Documents & Publications Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary - May 2009 System Planning for Low-Activity Waste at Hanford Hanford ETR Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Technical Review - External

62

Building Air Quality & Ventilation Models: Review - Evaluation - Proposals  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Building Air Quality & Ventilation Models: Review - Evaluation - Proposals Building Air Quality & Ventilation Models: Review - Evaluation - Proposals Speaker(s): James Axley Date: March 12, 1999 - 12:00pm Location: Bldg. 90 Seminar Host/Point of Contact: Richard Sextro Developments in mathematical models for building air quality and ventilation analysis have changed the way we idealize buildings for purposes of analysis, the way we form system equations to effect the analysis, and the way we solve these equations to realize the analysis. While much has been achieved more is possible. This presentation will review the current state of the art - the building idealizations used, the system equations formed, and the solution methods applied - critically evaluate the completeness, complexity and utility of the most advanced models, and present proposals for future development

63

CSEWG SYMPOSIUM, A CSWEG RETROSPECTIVE. 35TH ANNIVERSARY CROSS SECTION EVALUATION WORKING GROUP, NOV. 5, 2001, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY.  

SciTech Connect

This publication has been prepared to record some of the history of the Cross Section Evaluation Working Group (CSEWG). CSEWG is responsible for creating the evaluated nuclear data file (ENDF/B) which is widely used by scientists and engineers who are involved in the development and maintenance of applied nuclear technologies. This organization has become the model for the development of nuclear data libraries throughout the world. The data format (ENDF) has been adopted as the international standard. On November 5, 2001, a symposium was held at Brookhaven National Laboratory to celebrate the 50 th meeting of the CSEWG organization and the 35 th anniversary of its first meeting in November 1966. The papers presented in this volume were prepared by present and former CSEWG members for presentation at the November 2001 symposium. All but two of the presentations are included. I have included an appendix to list all of the CSEWG members and their affiliations, which has been compiled from the minutes of each of the CSEWG meetings. Minutes exist for all meetings except the 4 th meeting held in January 1968. The list includes 348 individuals from 71 organizations. The dates for each of the 50 CSEWG meetings are listed. The committee structure and chairmen of all committees and subcommittees are also included in the appendix. This volume is dedicated to three individuals whose foresight and talents made CSEWG possible and successful. They are Henry Honeck who lead the effort to develop the ENDF format and the CSEWG system, Ira Zartman, the Atomic Energy Commission program manager who provided the programmatic direction and support, and Sol Pearlstein who led the development of the CESWG organization and the ENDF/B evaluated nuclear data library.

DUNFORD, C.; HOLDEN, N.; PEARLSTEIN, S.

2001-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

64

No. ___________ Reviewer: ______________________________ 2014 WSU Academic Showcase Abstract Evaluation Rubric  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, or student A student-submitted abstract has either a faculty co-author or a faculty Sponsor All work mustNo. ___________ Reviewer: ______________________________ 2014 WSU Academic Showcase Abstract Evaluation Rubric Eligibility Criteria1 Does not meet criteria Abstract is submitted by a WSU faculty, staff

Collins, Gary S.

65

RTD Biodiesel (B20) Transit Bus Evaluation: Interim Review Summary  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

RTD Biodiesel (B20) Transit RTD Biodiesel (B20) Transit Bus Evaluation: Interim Review Summary K. Proc, R. Barnitt, and R.L. McCormick Technical Report NREL/TP-540-38364 August 2005 RTD Biodiesel (B20) Transit Bus Evaluation: Interim Review Summary K. Proc, R. Barnitt, and R.L. McCormick Prepared under Task No. FC05.9400 Technical Report NREL/TP-540-38364 August 2005 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute * Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any

66

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 19  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

19 19 Table 8. Total natural gas consumption, projected vs. actual Projected (trillion cubic feet) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 19.87 20.21 20.64 20.99 21.20 21.42 21.60 21.99 22.37 22.63 22.95 23.22 23.58 23.82 24.09 24.13 24.02 24.14 AEO 1995 20.82 20.66 20.85 21.21 21.65 21.95 22.12 22.25 22.43 22.62 22.87 23.08 23.36 23.61 24.08 24.23 24.59 AEO 1996 21.32 21.64 22.11 22.21 22.26 22.34 22.46 22.74 23.14 23.63 24.08 24.25 24.63 25.11 25.56 26.00

67

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 26  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6 6 Table 14a. Average electricity prices, projected vs. actual Projected price in constant dollars (constant dollars, cents per kilowatt-hour in "dollar year" specific to each AEO) AEO Dollar Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 1992 6.80 6.80 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 7.00 7.00 7.10 7.10 7.20 7.20 7.20 7.30 7.30 7.40 7.50 7.60

68

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 30  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 Table 17. Total delivered residential energy consumption, projected vs. actual Projected (quadrillion Btu) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 10.3 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.6 10.6 AEO 1995 10.96 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.8 10.8 10.9 AEO 1996 10.4 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.8 10.8 10.9 10.9 11.0 11.2 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7

69

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 12  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

12 12 Table 3a. Imported refiner acquisition cost of crude oil, projected vs. actual Projected price in constant dollars (constant dollars per barrel in "dollar year" specific to each AEO) AEO Dollar Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 1992 16.69 16.43 16.99 17.66 18.28 19.06 19.89 20.72 21.65 22.61 23.51 24.29 24.90 25.60 26.30 27.00 27.64 28.16 AEO 1995 1993 14.90 16.41 16.90 17.45 18.00 18.53 19.13 19.65 20.16 20.63 21.08 21.50 21.98 22.44 22.94 23.50 24.12

70

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 34  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 4 Table 21. Total energy related carbon dioxide emissions, projected vs. actual Projected (million metric tons) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 5060 5130 5185 5240 5287 5335 5379 5438 5482 5529 5599 5658 5694 5738 5797 5874 5925 5984 AEO 1995 5137 5174 5188 5262 5309 5361 5394 5441 5489 5551 5621 5680 5727 5775 5841 5889 5944 AEO 1996 5182 5224 5295 5355 5417 5464 5525 5589 5660 5735 5812 5879 5925 5981 6030 6087 AEO 1997 5295 5381 5491 5586 5658 5715 5781 5863 5934 6009 6106 6184 6236 6268 6316

71

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 13  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3 3 Table 3b. Imported refiner acquisition cost of crude oil, projected vs. actual Projected price in nominal dollars (nominal dollars per barrel) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 17.06 17.21 18.24 19.43 20.64 22.12 23.76 25.52 27.51 29.67 31.86 34.00 36.05 38.36 40.78 43.29 45.88 48.37 AEO 1995 15.24 17.27 18.23 19.26 20.39 21.59 22.97 24.33 25.79 27.27 28.82 30.38 32.14 33.89 35.85 37.97 40.28

72

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 21  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 1 Table 10. Natural gas net imports, projected vs. actual Projected (trillion cubic feet) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 2.02 2.40 2.66 2.74 2.81 2.85 2.89 2.93 2.95 2.97 3.00 3.16 3.31 3.50 3.57 3.63 3.74 3.85 AEO 1995 2.46 2.54 2.80 2.87 2.87 2.89 2.90 2.90 2.92 2.95 2.97 3.00 3.03 3.19 3.35 3.51 3.60 AEO 1996 2.56 2.75 2.85 2.88 2.93 2.98 3.02 3.06 3.07 3.09 3.12 3.17 3.23 3.29 3.37 3.46 AEO 1997 2.82 2.96 3.16 3.43 3.46 3.50 3.53 3.58 3.64 3.69 3.74 3.78 3.83 3.87 3.92

73

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 10  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

10 10 Table 2. Real gross domestic product, projected vs. actual Projected Real GDP growth trend (cumulative average percent growth in projected real GDP from first year shown for each AEO) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 3.1% 3.2% 2.9% 2.8% 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 2.3% AEO 1995 3.7% 2.8% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.6% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% AEO 1996 2.6% 2.2% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2%

74

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 32  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2 2 Table 19. Total delivered industrial energy consumption, projected vs. actual Projected (quadrillion Btu) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 25.4 25.9 26.3 26.7 27.0 27.1 26.8 26.6 26.9 27.2 27.7 28.1 28.3 28.7 29.1 29.4 29.7 30.0 AEO 1995 26.2 26.3 26.5 27.0 27.3 26.9 26.6 26.8 27.1 27.5 27.9 28.2 28.4 28.7 29.0 29.3 29.6 AEO 1996 26.5 26.6 27.3 27.5 26.9 26.5 26.7 26.9 27.2 27.6 27.9 28.2 28.3 28.5 28.7 28.9 AEO 1997 26.2 26.5 26.9 26.7 26.6 26.8 27.1 27.4 27.8 28.0 28.4 28.7 28.9 29.0 29.2

75

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 28  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8 8 Table 15. Total electricity sales, projected vs. actual Projected (billion kilowatt-hours) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 2843 2891 2928 2962 3004 3039 3071 3112 3148 3185 3228 3263 3298 3332 3371 3406 3433 3469 AEO 1995 2951 2967 2983 3026 3058 3085 3108 3134 3166 3204 3248 3285 3321 3357 3396 3433 3475 AEO 1996 2973 2998 3039 3074 3106 3137 3173 3215 3262 3317 3363 3409 3454 3505 3553 3604 AEO 1997 3075 3115 3168 3229 3290 3328 3379 3437 3497 3545 3596 3649 3697 3736 3784

76

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 22  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2 2 Table 11a. Coal prices to electric generating plants, projected vs. actual Projected price in constant dollars (constant dollars per million Btu in "dollar year" specific to each AEO) AEO Dollar Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 1992 1.47 1.48 1.53 1.57 1.58 1.57 1.61 1.63 1.68 1.69 1.70 1.72 1.70 1.76 1.79 1.81 1.88 1.92

77

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 33  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3 3 Table 20. Total delivered transportation energy consumption, projected vs. actual Projected (quadrillion Btu) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 23.6 24.1 24.5 24.7 25.1 25.4 25.7 26.2 26.5 26.9 27.2 27.6 27.9 28.3 28.6 28.9 29.2 29.5 AEO 1995 23.3 24.0 24.2 24.7 25.1 25.5 25.9 26.2 26.5 26.9 27.3 27.7 28.0 28.3 28.5 28.7 28.9 AEO 1996 23.9 24.1 24.5 24.8 25.3 25.7 26.0 26.4 26.7 27.1 27.5 27.8 28.1 28.4 28.6 28.9

78

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 14  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 4 Table 4. Total petroleum consumption, projected vs. actual Projected (million barrels) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 6450 6566 6643 6723 6811 6880 6957 7059 7125 7205 7296 7377 7446 7523 7596 7665 7712 7775 AEO 1995 6398 6544 6555 6676 6745 6822 6888 6964 7048 7147 7245 7337 7406 7472 7537 7581 7621 AEO 1996 6490 6526 6607 6709 6782 6855 6942 7008 7085 7176 7260 7329 7384 7450 7501 7545 AEO 1997 6636 6694 6826 6953 7074 7183 7267 7369 7461 7548 7643 7731 7793 7833 7884

79

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 1 Table 18. Total delivered commercial energy consumption, projected vs. actual Projected (quadrillion Btu) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 6.8 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.6 AEO 1995 6.94 6.9 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.3 AEO 1996 7.1 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.0

80

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 15  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 5 Table 5. Domestic crude oil production, projected vs. actual Projected (million barrels) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 2508 2373 2256 2161 2088 2022 1953 1891 1851 1825 1799 1781 1767 1759 1778 1789 1807 1862 AEO 1995 2402 2307 2205 2095 2037 1967 1953 1924 1916 1905 1894 1883 1887 1887 1920 1945 1967 AEO 1996 2387 2310 2248 2172 2113 2062 2011 1978 1953 1938 1916 1920 1927 1949 1971 1986 AEO 1997 2362 2307 2245 2197 2143 2091 2055 2033 2015 2004 1997 1989 1982 1975 1967

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 3  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3 3 Variable Average Absolute Percent Differences Percent of Projections Over- Estimated Gross Domestic Product Real Gross Domestic Product (Average Cumulative Growth)* (Table 2) 0.9 40.4 Petroleum Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil (Constant $) (Table 3a) 33.3 20.5 Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil (Nominal $) (Table 3b) 32.8 21.6 Total Petroleum Consumption (Table 4) 5.2 63.7 Crude Oil Production (Table 5) 6.2 62.0 Petroleum Net Imports (Table 6) 9.9 63.7

82

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 17  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7 7 Table 7a. Natural gas wellhead prices, projected vs. actual Projected price in constant dollars (constant dollars per thousand cubic feet in "dollar year" specific to each AEO) AEO Dollar Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 1992 1.94 2.03 2.11 2.19 2.29 2.35 2.39 2.42 2.47 2.55 2.65 2.75 2.89 3.01 3.17 3.30 3.35 3.47

83

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 20  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

20 20 Table 9. Natural gas production, projected vs. actual Projected (trillion cubic feet) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 17.71 17.68 17.84 18.12 18.25 18.43 18.58 18.93 19.28 19.51 19.80 19.92 20.13 20.18 20.38 20.35 20.16 20.19 AEO 1995 18.28 17.98 17.92 18.21 18.63 18.92 19.08 19.20 19.36 19.52 19.75 19.94 20.17 20.28 20.60 20.59 20.88 AEO 1996 18.90 19.15 19.52 19.59 19.59 19.65 19.73 19.97 20.36 20.82 21.25 21.37 21.68 22.11 22.47 22.83 AEO 1997 19.10 19.70 20.17 20.32 20.54 20.77 21.26 21.90 22.31 22.66 22.93 23.38 23.68 23.99 24.25

84

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 24  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 4 Table 12. Total coal consumption, projected vs. actual Projected (million short tons) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 920 928 933 938 943 948 953 958 962 967 978 990 987 992 1006 1035 1061 1079 AEO 1995 935 940 941 947 948 951 954 958 963 971 984 992 996 1002 1013 1025 1039 AEO 1996 937 942 954 962 983 990 1004 1017 1027 1033 1046 1067 1070 1071 1074 1082 AEO 1997 948 970 987 1003 1017 1020 1025 1034 1041 1054 1075 1086 1092 1092 1099

85

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 25  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 5 Table 13. Coal production, projected vs. actual Projected (million short tons) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 999 1021 1041 1051 1056 1066 1073 1081 1087 1098 1107 1122 1121 1128 1143 1173 1201 1223 AEO 1995 1006 1010 1011 1016 1017 1021 1027 1033 1040 1051 1066 1076 1083 1090 1108 1122 1137 AEO 1996 1037 1044 1041 1045 1061 1070 1086 1100 1112 1121 1135 1156 1161 1167 1173 1184 AEO 1997 1028 1052 1072 1088 1105 1110 1115 1123 1133 1146 1171 1182 1190 1193 1201

86

U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2011 and Prior Reference Case Projections 27  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7 7 Table 14b. Average electricity prices, projected vs. actual Projected price in nominal dollars (nominal dollars, cents per kilowatt-hour) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AEO 1994 6.95 7.12 7.41 7.59 7.79 8.01 8.36 8.62 9.02 9.32 9.76 10.08 10.42 10.94 11.32 11.87 12.45 13.05 AEO 1995 6.95 7.16 7.23 7.40 7.59 7.81 8.04 8.42 8.70 9.12 9.43 9.75 10.24 10.57 11.10 11.47 12.02

87

Department of Human Resources REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF JOB EVALUATION REVIEW RESULTS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. TELEPHONE #: Aiken Plan Factor(s) Appealed Post-Review Rating(s) (Ratings outlined on the Notification of Job Evaluation Review Results form) Proposed Rating(s) (Based upon your review of the Aiken PlanDepartment of Human Resources REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF JOB EVALUATION REVIEW RESULTS APPEAL 02

Oyet, Alwell

88

Department of Human Resources REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF JOB EVALUATION REVIEW RESULTS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

#: Aiken Plan Factor(s) Appealed Post-Review Rating(s) (Ratings outlined on the Notification of Job Evaluation Review Results form) Proposed Rating(s) (Based upon your review of the Aiken Plan) ReasonDepartment of Human Resources REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF JOB EVALUATION REVIEW RESULTS APPEAL 02

Oyet, Alwell

89

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 9, 2011.

90

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting plenary session on June 16, 2014.

91

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting plenary session on May 13, 2013.

92

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting plenary session on May 14, 2012.

93

Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Heavy veHicle SyStemS OptimizatiOn merit review and peer evaluatiOn Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Peer Review Meeting, held April 18-20, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory in suburban Chicago, Illinois. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these systems optimization projects.

94

Vehicle Technologies Office: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

reviews are described in the Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review Reports: 2013 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review Report 2012 DOE Vehicle...

95

A review of SQUID magnetometry applied to nondestructive evaluation  

SciTech Connect

This paper reports on the development of the SQUID as the most sensitive instrument known for the measurement of changes in magnetic flux has presented new opportunities for its use for nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of electrically conducting and ferromagnetic structures. This presentation will review the preliminary studies of this application within the past few years in order to serve as an introduction to those that follow. It will include early work by the author which explored the ability of a SQUID to detect defects in a buried pipe and to detect fatigue in steel structures.

Weinstock, H. (Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Bolling AFB, DC (United States))

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail and Peer Evaluation Report to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: 2003 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report on AddThis.com... Publications Program Publications Roadmaps Program Plans Reports to Congress Annual Progress Reports

97

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program has posted the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, which summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR) held June 16–20, 2014, in Washington, D.C.

98

Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules April 29, 2011 Draft Executive Summary On January 18, 2011, the President issued Executive Order 13563, ‗‗Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' to ensure that Federal regulations seek more affordable, less intrusive means to achieve policy goals, and that agencies give careful consideration to the benefits and costs of those regulations. Executive Order 13563 recognizes the importance of maintaining a consistent culture of retrospective review and analysis throughout the executive branch. To that end, Executive Order 13563 requires agencies, by May 18, 2011, to develop a plan for review of

99

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The report summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, which was held May 13–17, 2013, in Arlington, Virginia.

100

RETROSPECTIVE: Software Pipelining  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

- cialized hardware designed to support software pipelining. In the meantime, trace scheduling was touted compiler with software pipelining for the polycyclic architecture, which had a novel crossbar whose crossRETROSPECTIVE: Software Pipelining: An Effective Scheduling Technique for VLIW Machines Monica S

Pratt, Vaughan

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Design and Evaluation of High Capacity Cathodes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Argonne National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about design and...

102

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: APEEM Components Analysis and Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about APEEM...

103

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Field Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by National Renewable Energy Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about medium...

104

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Evaluation of VTO Benefits Using Large Scale Simulation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Argonne National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about the evaluation of...

105

Supporting scientific writing and evaluation in a conceptual physics course with Calibrated Peer Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

students' writing can be difficult in large classes. With the web-based Calibrated Peer Review* (CPR and compared students' peer reviews with expert evaluations. Students' scores on their essays correlate with implementing CPR assignments. *Calibrated Peer Review, http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu/ Keywords: conceptual physics

Goldberg, Fred M.

106

API Peer Reviews: A Method for Evaluating Usability of Application Programming Interfaces  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

API usability tests in the lab are time and resource intensive, thus allowing a relatively small percentage of the API namespace to be evaluated. We describe a group-based usability inspection method – API Peer Reviews – to evaluate API usability. Based on an analysis of usability breakdowns from API Peer Reviews and API usability tests, results show that API Peer Reviews identified breakdowns across several cognitive dimensions, some of which were different than what was identified by API usability tests. We reflect on the adoption of API Peer Reviews as a collaborative practice in organizations for evaluating API usability. Author Keywords API usability, cognitive dimensions, usability inspection.

Umer Farooq; Dieter Zirkler

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules On January 18, 2011, the President issued Executive Order 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review," to ensure that Federal regulations seek more affordable, less intrusive means to achieve policy goals, and that agencies give careful consideration to the benefits and costs of those regulations. Executive Order 13563 recognizes the importance of maintaining a consistent culture of retrospective review and analysis throughout the executive branch. To that end, Executive Order 13563 requires agencies, by May 18, 2011, to develop a plan for review of their existing significant regulations. DOE_05_18_2011.pdf More Documents & Publications

108

Development and evaluation of value-based review (vbr) methods  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Reviewing is a key activity that can find defects at an early stage of system and software development. Since it is often cheaper to fix defects at an early stage, reviewing is a good technique for improving both product quality and project cost effectiveness. ...

Keun Lee / Barry B. Boehm

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

Department of Teaching, Learning and Culture Process for Post-Tenure Peer Review The Department has an elected faculty evaluation committee that does peer reviews of all  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Department of Teaching, Learning and Culture Process for Post-Tenure Peer Review The Department has an elected faculty evaluation committee that does peer reviews of all tenure-line faculty annual evaluation and Human Development Guidelines approved on August 2, 2011, the committee will now provide peer review

Boas, Harold P.

110

Advanced Combustion Engine Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle ADVANCED COMBUSTION ENGINE PROGRAM F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 5, 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on April 19-21, 2005 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory researchers in the development of Annual Operating Plans (AOPs) for fiscal year (FY) 2006. The panel's

111

Heavy Vehicle Materials Program 2005 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT MERIT REVIEW & PEER EVALUATION REPORT HEAVY VEHICLE MATERIALS PROGRAM Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 2005 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Heavy Vehicle Materials Program Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, held September 13-15, 2005 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The goal of this document is to provide the reader with a summary of the comments and scores from expert reviewers from industry and government on these Materials Technologies projects.

112

Methodological reviews of economic evaluations in health care: what do they target?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

An increasing number of published studies of economic evaluations of health technologies have been reviewed and summarized with different purposes, among them to facilitate decision-making processes. These rev...

Maria-Florencia Hutter; Roberto Rodríguez-Ibeas…

2014-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program FY2003 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document summarizes the comments provided by the Merit Review Panel at the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program FY 2003 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, held on May 19-22, 2003, in Berkeley, California.

114

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2010 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held June 7-11, 2010 in Washington, D.C.

Not Available

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Hydrogen Technology Validation: DOE Hydrogen Program 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 9–13, 2011 in Arlington, VA.

116

A Retrospective Review of Supratherapeutic Modafinil Exposures  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

as a heart rate >100 bpm, and hypertension was defined as aand ranged from 101 to 168 bpm. Hypertension occurred in sixrevealed a heart rate of 64 bpm and blood pressure of 137/78

Carstairs, Shaun D.; Urquhart, Andrew; Hoffman, Justin; Clark, Richard F.; Cantrell, F. Lee

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

RTD Biodiesel (B20) Transit Bus Evaluation: Interim Review Summary  

SciTech Connect

A summary of the data NREL collected from a project to evaluate the in-use performance of buses from the Regional Transportation District of Denver operating on B20.

Proc, K.; Barnitt, R.; McCormick, R. L.

2005-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

A critical review of methods and models for evaluating organizational factors in Human Reliability Analysis  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract This work makes a critical evaluation of the deficiencies concerning human factors and evaluates the potential of quantitative techniques that have been proposed in the last decades, like THERP (Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction), CREAM (Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method), and ATHEANA (A Technique for Human Event Analysis), to model organizational factors, including cognitive processes in humans and interactions among humans and groups. Two important models are discussed in this context: STAMP (Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Process), based on system theory and FRAM (Functional Resonance Analysis Method), which aims at modeling the nonlinearities of socio-technical systems. These models, however, are not yet being used in risk analysis similarly to Probabilistic Safety Analyses for safety assessment of nuclear reactors. However, STAMP has been successfully used for retrospective analysis of events, which would allow an extension of these studies to prospective safety analysis.

M.A.B. Alvarenga; P.F. Frutuoso e Melo; R.A. Fonseca

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Review and Evaluation of Security Threats on the Communication Networks in the Smart Grid  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Review and Evaluation of Security Threats on the Communication Networks in the Smart Grid Zhuo Lu Park, NC 27709 Email: cliff.wang@us.army.mil Abstract--The smart grid, generally referred in the smart grid. In this paper, we aim at classifying and evaluating the security threats

Wang, Wenye

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Thermal-Response Evaluation of Yucca Mountain  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Thermal-Response Evaluation of Yucca Mountain During the Preclosure and Postclosure Phases July 2008 #12;Thermal Response Evaluation of Yucca Mountain July 2008 Page of the thermal response of the proposed Yucca Mountain repository for various thermal loadings. The U. S. Nuclear

122

Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Through this notice, the Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of its preliminary plan for retrospective analysis of existing rules to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, DOE sought public comments on whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. DOE has considered these comments in the development of its preliminary plan.

123

Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Through this notice, the Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of its preliminary plan for retrospective analysis of existing rules to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, DOE sought public comments on whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. DOE has considered these comments in the development of its preliminary plan.

124

IACUC evaluation and external scientific review. IACUC Overstepping its Bounds  

SciTech Connect

I was asked to submit a response to the Protocol Review forum for the journal LabAnimal by Dr. Jerald Silverman. This forum request views and opinions on issues that are faced by research animal welfare committees. The particular issue is: Dr. John Smith, a distinguished investigator at Great Eastern University, had spent his career searching for a treatment for hearing loss. After 20 years of research, he developed a drug that potentially could improve auditory function after damage to the inner ear. The drug was administered by injection into the middle ear with the use of a fine needle inserted through the eardrum. Smith submitted a protocol to the IACUC to conduct a small study on cats, proposing to treat one group of animals with the drug and another with saline, to determine if it prevented the changes in the anatomy of the inner ear that normally occur with aging.

Poston, Ted M.; Thrall, Karla D.; Penner, Jocelyn D.

2010-08-30T23:59:59.000Z

125

Review of mathematical modeling for evaluation of SVE applications  

SciTech Connect

Soil vapor extraction (SVE), a demonstrated technology, enhances the removal of volatile chemicals from the subsurface through application of a vacuum at an extraction well to induce air flow through the subsurface toward the well. As of 1991, SVE comprised 13% of selected remedies at Superfund sites, and approximately 7% of leaking underground storage tanks. The flow of air enhances volatilization of compounds from the residual NAPL phase in soil pores and from the dissolved phase in soil pore water. The technology is particularly applicable to relatively volatile organic compounds (Henry`s law constant > 10{sup -3} atm-m{sup 3}/mole) residing in the vadose zone. The technology may also be applicable for removal of volatile light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) floating on the water table or entrained in the capillary fringe, if the chemicals of concern have high vapor pressures. Effective design and prediction of system performance can be difficult, depending on site conditions. Tools are now available, in the form of numerical models, that allow one to both screen for the potential feasibility of SVE, and design and estimate performance of the system. While modeling should not be considered an end in itself, it provides a means by which to quantify some of the important SVE operating processes. Modeling can provide estimated answers for numerous questions concerning the feasibility and usage of SVE. Screening models can be used in conjunction with site characterization data and best professional judgment to determine the potential feasibility of SVE at a contaminated site. Flow and transport models can then be used to enhance the system design process and estimate performance. The work performed as part of this effort included a review of models that can be applied to SVE applications. This review includes a summary of critical information required in a SVE application. It also includes a model selection process, model usage guidelines, and case studies.

Jordan, D.L.; Mercer, J.W. [GeoTrans, Inc., Sterling, VA (United States)

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Master of Public Service and Administration Program Review and Evaluation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and Public Service?s Master of Public Service and Administration (MPSA) degree program recognizes the benefits of ongoing self-evaluation. The Bush School is located at Texas A&M University and houses both the MPSA program and the Master?s Program... were also analyzed separately based upon their prior experience. If they had worked in the public service sector before entering the MPSA program, they were identified as being in-service. If they had not worked in the public service sector before...

McElheny, Sue; McMillen, Stephanie; Payne, Tyler; Perez, Paige; Vela, Austin; Ward, David; Weissgerber, Alec

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Review of Prior Commercial Building Energy Efficiency Retrofit Evaluation: A Report to Snohomish Public Utilities District  

SciTech Connect

Snohomish County Public Utilities District (the District or Snohomish PUD) provides electricity to about 325,000 customers in Snohomish County, Washington. The District has an incentive programs to encourage commercial customers to improve energy efficiency: the District partially reimburses the cost of approved retrofits if they provide a level of energy performance improvement that is specified by contract. In 2013 the District contracted with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to provide a third-party review of the Monitoring and Verification (M&V) practices the District uses to evaluate whether companies are meeting their contractual obligations. This work helps LBNL understand the challenges faced by real-world practitioners of M&V of energy savings, and builds on a body of related work such as Price et al. (2013). The District selected a typical project for which they had already performed an evaluation. The present report includes the District's original evaluation as well as LBNL's review of their approach. The review is based on the document itself; on investigation of the load data and outdoor air temperature data from the building evaluated in the document; and on phone discussions with Bill Harris of the Snohomish County Public Utilities District. We will call the building studied in the document the subject building, the original Snohomish PUD report will be referred to as the Evaluation, and this discussion by LBNL is called the Review.

Price, Phillip

2014-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

128

Retrospective Evaluation of Appliance Price Trends  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the higher the product cost and retail price. Table 3.change and appliance price Room air conditioners Small (price data to clarify price

Dale, Larry

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Retrospective Evaluation of Appliance Price Trends  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM), 1978–2001 AssociationHome Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM), 1978–2001. Directory ofAppliance Manufacturers (AHAM) certified directory where

Dale, Larry

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Retrospective Evaluation of Appliance Price Trends  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Certified Refrigerators and Freezers. Business Newst(59) R 2 =.76 Refrigerators Top mounted freezer-AutodefrostRefrigerator consumption is given by adjusted volume/annual consumption, where adjusted volume, is defined as fresh food volume+1.63×freezer

Dale, Larry

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Accelerating the Evaluation and Market Introduction of Advanced Technologies Through Model Based System Engineering  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Argonne National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about accelerating the...

132

Advanced Combustion, Emission Control, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06 06 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t L e s s d e p e n d e n c e o n f o r e i g n o i l t o d a y, a n d t r a n s i t i o n t o a p e t r o l e u m - f r e e , e m i s s i o n s - f r e e v e h i c l e t o m o r r o w . F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m AdvAnced combustion, emission controls, HeAltH impActs, And Fuels merit review And peer evAluAtion Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 2006 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2006 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion, Emission Controls, Health Impacts, and Fuels Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 15-18, 2006 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were provided (with reviewers' names deleted) to the presenters in early June and were used by national laboratory

133

A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF EMERGING DRIVER FATIGUE DETECTION MEASURES AND TECHNOLOGIES  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

- 1 - A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF EMERGING DRIVER FATIGUE DETECTION MEASURES AND TECHNOLOGIES Lawrence Barr1 , Heidi Howarth1 , Stephen Popkin1 , Robert J. Carroll2 1 John A. Volpe National times, rest periods, recovery opportunities, and response to customer needs can vary widely. In addition

134

Retrospective salt tectonics  

SciTech Connect

The conceptual breakthroughs in understanding salt tectonics can be recognized by reviewing the history of salt tectonics, which divides naturally into three parts: the pioneering era, the fluid era, and the brittle era. The pioneering era (1856-1933) featured the search for a general hypothesis of salt diapirism, initially dominated by bizarre, erroneous notions of igneous activity, residual islands, in situ crystallization, osmotic pressures, and expansive crystallization. Gradually data from oil exploration constrained speculation. The effects of buoyancy versus orogeny were debated, contact relations were characterized, salt glaciers were discovered, and the concepts of downbuilding and differential loading were proposed as diapiric mechanisms. The fluid era (1933-{approximately}1989) was dominated by the view that salt tectonics resulted from Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities in which a dense fluid overburden having negligible yield strength sinks into a less dense fluid salt layer, displacing it upward. Density contrasts, viscosity contrasts, and dominant wavelengths were emphasized, whereas strength and faulting of the overburden were ignored. During this era, palinspastic reconstructions were attempted; salt upwelling below thin overburdens was recognized; internal structures of mined diapirs were discovered; peripheral sinks, turtle structures, and diapir families were comprehended; flow laws for dry salt were formulated; and contractional belts on divergent margins and allochthonous salt sheets were recognized. The 1970s revealed the basic driving force of salt allochthons, intrasalt minibasins, finite strains in diapirs, the possibility of thermal convection in salt, direct measurement of salt glacial flow stimulated by rainfall, and the internal structure of convecting evaporites and salt glaciers. The 1980`s revealed salt rollers, subtle traps, flow laws for damp salt, salt canopies, and mushroom diapirs.

Jackson, M.P.A. [Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

135

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1950 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS R. E. BEARD Statistics...Price 20s. [453 ] REVIEWS Statistics, Volume I...regard to the mathematical standard required by the Institute...distributions.' The general plan of the book is first......

R. E. BEARD

1950-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

136

Habitat Evaluation: Guidance for the Review of Environmental Impact Assessment Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HABITAT EVALUATION: HABITAT EVALUATION: GUIDANCE FOR THE REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS EPA Contract No. 68-C0-0070 work Assignments B-21, 1-12 January 1993 Submitted to: Jim Serfis U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Federal Activities 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 Submitted by: Mark Southerland Dynamac Corporation The Dynamac Building 2275 Research Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ... ...... .... ... ................................................. 1 Habitat Conservation .......................................... 2 Habitat Evaluation Methodology ................................... 2 Habitats of Concern ........................................... 3 Definition of Habitat ..................................... 4

137

Using the Systematic Review Methodology To Evaluate Factors That Influence the Persistence of Influenza Virus in Environmental Matrices  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...METHODS Using the Systematic Review Methodology To Evaluate Factors...production systems. This systematic review identifies literature describing...influenza (HPAI) response plan, p. 1-86. United States...of transmission: a critical review. J. Infect. 57: 361-373...

C. K. Irwin; K. J. Yoon; C. Wang; S. J. Hoff; J. J. Zimmerman; T. Denagamage; A. M. O'Connor

2010-12-10T23:59:59.000Z

138

DOE-STD-1134-99 Review Guide for Criticality Safety Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-99 4-99 September 1999 DOE STANDARD REVIEW GUIDE FOR CRITICALITY SAFETY EVALUATIONS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1134-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy Standard is approved for use by all DOE criticality safety personnel. It contains guidelines that should be followed when reviewing Criticality Safety Evaluations that

139

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1959 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS E. S. PEARSON The Advanced...433 . 84s. [491 ] REVIEWS The Advanced Theory of...the same comprehensive standard, three volumes will...inserted in the original plan at this half-way stage......

E. S. PEARSON

1959-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review Reviews Reviews Factors for One-sided...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...Pp. 412 . 5.00. Reviews 293 Handbook of Nonparametric...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...expected value ft and standard deviation cr/^/n......

Reviews

1964-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Sustainable energy transitions will be hampered without sufficient public support. Hence, it is important to understand what drives public acceptability of (sustainable) energy alternatives. Evaluations of specific costs, including risks, and benefits of different energy alternatives have been linked to acceptability of these alternatives. But how do people come up with these evaluations, and which evaluations are the key drivers of acceptability? In this review, we propose a comprehensive conceptual framework in which we integrate two growing but so far unconnected bodies of research on how objective characteristics of energy alternatives (i.e., contextual factors), on one hand, and, on the other hand, general psychological factors shape evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives. Importantly, we identify general factors, particularly values, that may influence evaluations and acceptability of many different energy alternatives on a general as well as community level. We put forward a research agenda with two major themes. First, we lay out possibilities to strengthen the current knowledge basis for a conceptual framework that explains evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives. Second, we suggest how the framework could be extended to explain evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives in a more comprehensive and accurate way. Based on the knowledge developed, we discuss policy implications, some of which have not been put forward yet and hence propose new possibilities for interventions aimed at enhancing sustainable energy transitions.

Goda Perlaviciute; Linda Steg

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

ESS 2012 Peer Review - Evaluating Utility Owned Electric ESS - Dhruv Bhatnagar, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluating Utility Owned Evaluating Utility Owned Electric Energy Storage Systems: A Perspective for State Electric Utility Regulators DOE Energy Storage Program Peer Review 2012 September 28, 2012 Dhruv Bhatnagar & Verne Loose Sandia National Laboratories Motivation for this Work  Many state utility regulatory bodies are unfamiliar with electric energy storage systems  The technology  The functional uses  The value of these uses to the grid  This leads to a handicap in their proper evaluation for rate base  May prevent the best (economic) technologies from system integration 2 Source: GE What we are doing  Developing a guidebook:  Inform regulators about the system benefits of energy storage  Identify regulatory challenges to increased

143

Assessment of ecological risks in weed biocontrol: Input from retrospective ecological analyses  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Prediction of the outcomes of natural enemy introductions remains the most fundamental challenge in biological control. Quantitative retrospective analyses of ongoing biocontrol projects provide a systematic strategy to evaluate and further develop ecological risk assessment. In this review, we highlight a crucial assumption underlying a continued reliance on the host specificity paradigm as a quantitative prediction of ecological risk, summarize the status of our retrospective analyses of nontarget effects of two weevils used against exotic thistles in North America, and discuss our prospective assessment of risk to a federally listed, threatened species (Cirsium pitcheri) based on those studies. Our analyses quantify the fact that host range and preference from host specificity tests are not sufficient to predict ecological impact if the introduced natural enemy is not strictly monophagous. The implicit assumption when such use is made of the host specificity data in risk assessment is that population impacts are proportional to relative preference and performance, the key components of host specificity. However, in concert with shifting awareness in the field, our studies demonstrate that the environment influences and can alter host use and population growth, leading to higher than expected direct impacts on the less preferred native host species at several spatial scales. Further, we have found that straightforward, easily anticipated indirect effects, on intraguild foragers as well as on the less preferred native host plant species, can be both widespread and significant. We conclude that intensive retrospective ecological studies provide some guidance for the quantitative prospective studies needed to assess candidate biological control agent dynamics and impacts and, so, contribute to improved rigor in the evaluation of total ecological risk to native species.

Svata M. Louda; Tatyana A. Rand; F. Leland Russell; Amy E. Arnett

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ANALYSIS ANALYSIS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 465 2013 - Systems Analysis Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Systems Analysis Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Systems Analysis Program: The reviewers considered the Systems Analysis program to be an essential component of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program's (the Program's) mission. The projects were considered to be appropriately diverse and focused on addressing technical barriers and meeting targets. In general, the reviewers noted that the Systems Analysis program is well managed and demonstrated the ability to address immediate analytical needs and overall objectives and plans, especially to implement the new initiative, H

145

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: SCAQMD: Plug-In Hybrid Electric Medium-Duty Commercial Fleet Demonstration and Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by South Coast Air Quality Management District at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about...

146

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: CoolCab Test and Evaluation and CoolCalc HVAC Tool Development  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by National Renewable Energy Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about CoolCab...

147

Review and evaluation of extractants for strontium removal using magnetically assisted chemical separation  

SciTech Connect

A literature review on extractants for strontium removal was initially performed at Northern Illinois University to assess their potential in magnetically assisted chemical separation. A series of potential strontium extractants was systematically evaluated there using radioanalytical methods. Initial experiments were designed to test the uptake of strontium from nitric acid using several samples of magnetic extractant particles that were coated with various crown ether ligands. High partition coefficient (K{sub d}) values for stimulant tank waste were obtained. Further studies demonstrated that the large partitioning was due to uncoated particles.

Bauer, C.B.; Rogers, R.D. [Northern Illinois Univ., De Kalb, IL (United States). Dept. of Chemistry; Nunez, L.; Ziemer, M.D.; Pleune, T.T.; Vandegrift, G.F. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Summary of the planning, management, and evaluation process for the Geothermal Program Review VI conference  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to present an overview of the planning, facilitation, and evaluation process used to conduct the Geothermal Program Review VI (PR VI) conference. This document was also prepared to highlight lessons learned from PR VI and, by utilizing the evaluation summaries and recommendations, be used as a planning tool for PR VII. The conference, entitled Beyond Goals and Objectives,'' was sponsored by the US Department of Energy's (DOE) Geothermal Technology Division (GTD), PR VI was held in San Francisco, California on April 19--21, 1988 and was attended by 127 participants. PR VI was held in conjunction with the National Geothermal Association's (NGA) Industry Round Table. This document presents a brief summary of the activities, responsibilities, and resources for implementing the PR VI meeting and provides recommendations, checklists, and a proposed schedule for assisting in planning PR VII.

Not Available

1988-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

VALIDATION VALIDATION 380 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Technology Validation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Technology Validation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Technology Validation Program: In general, the reviewers believed the program area was adequately covered. The role of the Technology Validation program within the structure of the Fuel Cell Technologies Office was clearly identified. Progress relating to projects was clearly presented and plans were identified for addressing issues and challenges. The partnership with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) data collection/analysis team was seen as key to the success

150

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

AND DELIVERY AND DELIVERY FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 7 2013 - Hydrogen Production and Delivery Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program: This review session evaluated hydrogen production and delivery research and development (R&D) activities in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO) in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The hydrogen production projects reviewed represented a diverse portfolio of technologies to produce hydrogen from renewable energy sources. Production project sub-categories included water electrolysis, solar-driven thermochemical cycles, photoelectrochemical (PEC) direct water splitting, and biological hydrogen

151

AHRI Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis | Department...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Existing Rules Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) Regulatory Burden RFI A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of...

152

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......of organizing computations (though he does not discuss the product form of the inverse...theory. It reads with the drynesa of a handbook. This does not detract from Reviews 479 ita value; as a handbook it is excellent and the reviewer has no......

J. G. SAW

1961-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

153

REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......continuity management standards: the earlier British standard BS 25999 and the international...requirements of the latter standard. The fourth part of...Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information...first three chapters review the threat landscape......

Project Management for IT-related Projects (Second Edition) ? M & A Integration: How to do it ? Pegasus: The Seminal Early Computer ? The Computer Incident Response Planning Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information at Risk ? Interop – The Promise; Perils of Highly Interconnected Systems ? Business continuity management systems

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

154

REVIEW:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Computers Reviewers, 2011 Stefan Agamanolis, United Kingdom Rosa Alarcon, Chile Frances Aldrich, United Kingdom Jason Alexander, United Kingdom Norman Alm, United Kingdom Analia Amandi, Argentina Chee Siang Ang, United Kingdom Alissa Antle......

Reviewers; Editors Appreciation 2011

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 » Restructuring in Retrospect, Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 » Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 This report provides policymakers with guidance as they examine past and future restructuring efforts and seek to determine how competitive markets can be of benefit to customers. Industrial and larger commercial customers may benefit from competitive markets, while residential and small commercial customers may not benefit unless legislators focus specifically on their needs. But it also has become evident that even the largest customers will save money only if the wholesale market functions smoothly. State policymakers have at their disposal numerous options that may enable both retail and wholesale power markets, but even five years into the experiment, it has yet to be determined which state policies will be most

156

Review and evaluation of the Office of Science and Technology`s Community Leaders Network  

SciTech Connect

This report constitutes a review and evaluation of the Community Leaders Network (CLN), an informally structured national stakeholder group sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Program`s Office of Science and Technology (OST) to obtain citizen input into the technology research and development programs of the OST. Since the CLN`s inception in 1993, its participants, currently numbering about 35 members mostly from jurisdictions hosting DOE waste management and environmental remediation sites, and its clients (i.e., OST) have invested substantial resources to develop the capability to enhance technology development and deployment activities through proactive stakeholder involvement. The specific objectives of the CLN are to: provide feedback and input to OST on technology development activities; provide information on OST ideas and approaches to key stakeholder groups, and provide input to OST on stakeholder concerns and involvement.

Carnes, S.A.; Schweitzer, M.; Peelle, E.R.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

INTERNAL REPAIR OF PIPELINES REVIEW & EVALUATION OF INTERNAL PIPELINE REPAIR TRIALS REPORT  

SciTech Connect

The two broad categories of fiber-reinforced composite liner repair and deposited weld metal repair technologies were reviewed and evaluated for potential application for internal repair of gas transmission pipelines. Both are used to some extent for other applications and could be further developed for internal, local, structural repair of gas transmission pipelines. Evaluation trials were conducted on pipe sections with simulated corrosion damage repaired with glass fiber-reinforced composite liners, carbon fiber-reinforced composite liners, and weld deposition. Additional un-repaired pipe sections were evaluated in the virgin condition and with simulated damage. Hydrostatic failure pressures for pipe sections repaired with glass fiber-reinforced composite liner were only marginally greater than that of pipe sections without liners, indicating that this type of liner is generally ineffective at restoring the pressure containing capabilities of pipelines. Failure pressure for pipe repaired with carbon fiber-reinforced composite liner was greater than that of the un-repaired pipe section with damage, indicating that this type of liner is effective at restoring the pressure containing capability of pipe. Pipe repaired with weld deposition failed at pressures lower than that of un-repaired pipe in both the virgin and damaged conditions, indicating that this repair technology is less effective at restoring the pressure containing capability of pipe than a carbon fiber-reinforced liner repair. Physical testing indicates that carbon fiber-reinforced liner repair is the most promising technology evaluated to-date. Development of a comprehensive test plan for this process is recommended for use in the next phase of this project.

Robin Gordon; Bill Bruce; Ian Harris; Dennis Harwig; George Ritter; Bill Mohr; Matt Boring; Nancy Porter; Mike Sullivan; Chris Neary

2004-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

A retrospective of VAWT technology.  

SciTech Connect

The study of Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) technology at Sandia National Laboratories started in the 1970's and concluded in the 1990's. These studies concentrated on the Darrieus configurations because of their high inherent efficiency, but other configurations (e.g., the Savonius turbine) were also examined. The Sandia VAWT program culminated with the design of the 34-m 'Test Bed' Darrieus VAWT. This turbine was designed and built to test various VAWT design concepts and to provide the necessary databases to validate analytical design codes and algorithms. Using the Test Bed as their starting point, FloWind Corp. developed a commercial VAWT product line with composite blades and an extended height-to-diameter ratio. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the design process and results of the Sandia 34-m VAWT Test Bed program and the FloWind prototype development program with an eye toward future offshore designs. This paper is our retrospective of the design, analysis, testing and commercial process. Special emphasis is given to those lessons learned that will aid in the development of an off-shore VAWT.

Ashwill, Thomas D.; Sutherland, Herbert J. (HJS Consulting, Albuquerque, NM); Berg, Dale E.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report (Book)  

SciTech Connect

The fiscal year (FY) 2013 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), in conjunction with DOE's Vehicle Technologies Office AMR, was held from May 13-16, 2013, at the Crystal City Marriott and Crystal Gateway Marriott in Arlington, Virginia. This report is a summary of comments by AMR peer reviewers about the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE).

Not Available

2013-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

MATERIAL COMPATIBILITY EVALUATION FOR DWPF NITRIC-GLYCOLIC ACID - LITERATURE REVIEW  

SciTech Connect

Glycolic acid is being evaluated as an alternative for formic and nitric acid in the DWPF flowsheet. Demonstration testing and modeling for this new flowsheet has shown that glycolic acid and glycolate has a potential to remain in certain streams generated during the production of the nuclear waste glass. A literature review was conducted to assess the impact of glycolic acid on the corrosion of the materials of construction for the DWPF facility as well as facilities downstream which may have residual glycolic acid and glycolates present. The literature data was limited to solutions containing principally glycolic acid. The reported corrosion rates and degradation characteristics have shown the following for the materials of construction. ? For C276 alloy, the primary material of construction for the CPC vessels, corrosion rates of either 2 or 20 mpy were reported up to a temperature of 93 ?C. ? For the austenitic stainless steels, 304L and 316L, variable rates were reported over a range of temperatures, varying from 2 mpy up to 200 mpy (at 100 ?C). ? For 690, G30, Allcorr, Ultimet and Stellite alloys no data were available. ? For relevant polymers where data are available, the data suggests that exposure to glycolic acid is not detrimental. The literature data had limited application to the DWPF process since only the storage and feed vessels, pumps and piping used to handle the glycolic acid are directly covered by the available data. These components are either 304L or 316L alloys for which the literature data is inconsistent (See Bullet 2 above). Corrosion rates in pure glycolic acid solutions also are not representative of the DWPF process streams. This stream is complex and contains aggressive species, i.e. chlorides, sulfates, mercury, as well as antifoaming agents which cumulatively have an unknown effect on the corrosion rates of the materials of construction. Therefore, testing is recommended to investigate any synergistic effects of the aggressive species and to verify the performance of materials in the key process vessels as well as downstream vessels and processes such as the evaporator where heating is occurring. The following testing would provide data for establishing the viability of these components. ? Electrochemical testing - evaluate the corrosion rate and susceptibility to localized corrosion within the SRAT, SME, OGCT, Quencher and Evaporator. Testing would be conducted at operational temperatures in simulants with ranges of glycolic acid, iron, chloride, sulfate, mercury, and antifoaming agents. ? Hot-wall testing – evaluate the corrosion under heat transfer conditions to simulate those for heating coils and evaporator coil surfaces. Testing would be at nominal chemistries with concentration of glycolic acid, chloride, sulfate and mercury at high expected concentrations. Some tests would be performed with antifoaming agents. ? Melter coupon testing – evaluate the performance of alloy 690 in melter feeds containing glycolic acid. This testing would be conducted as part of the melter flammability testing. ? Polymer testing – evaluate changes in polymer properties in immersion testing with DWPF simulants to provide product-specific data for service life evaluation and analyze the Hansen solubility parameters for relevant polymers in glycolic vs. formic acid. During this literature review process, the difficulties associated with measuring the liquid level in formic acid tanks were revealed. A test is recommended to resolve this issue prior to the introduction of glycolic acid into the DWPF. This testing would evaluate the feasibility of using ultrasonic inspection techniques to determine liquid level and other desirable attributes of glycolic acid in DWPF storage tanks and related equipment.

Mickalonis, J.; Skidmore, E.

2013-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Review:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The knowledge discovery and data mining (KDDM) process models describe the various phases (e.g. business understanding, data understanding, data preparation, modeling, evaluation and deployment) of the KDDM process. They act as a roadmap for implementation ...

Sumana Sharma; Kweku-muata Osei-bryson

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

162

AHAM Retrospective Preliminary Plan | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Retrospective Preliminary Plan Retrospective Preliminary Plan AHAM Retrospective Preliminary Plan The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on preliminary plan for retrospective analysis of existing rules, 76 Fed. Reg. 40646 (July 11, 2011). AHAM represents manufacturers of major, portable and floor care home appliances, and suppliers to the industry. AHAM's more than 150 members employ tens of thousands of people in the U.S. and produce more than 95% of the household appliances shipped for sale within the U.S. AHAM_Comments.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI AHAM Letter Acknowledging DOE Letter on Verification Program

163

Page | 1 NASA Retrospective Plan Progress  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page | 1 NASA Retrospective Plan Progress January 9, 2011 Agency) Progress updates and anticipated accomplishments Notes 1. NASA/Procurement AD60 NASA Payments This rule revises the NASA Grant and Cooperative Handbook at 14 CFR

Waliser, Duane E.

164

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

xxxvi | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Hydrogen Production and Delivery ........................................................................................................... 7 PD-014: Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Analysis .................................................................................. 10 PD-022: Fiber-Reinforced Composite Pipelines ........................................................................................ 14 PD-025: Hydrogen Embrittlement of Structural Steels .............................................................................. 20

165

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS 402 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Safety, Codes and Standards Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Safety, Codes and Standards Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Safety, Codes and Standards Program: The Safety, Codes and Standards program supports research and development (R&D) that provides the critical information needed to define requirements and close gaps in safety, codes, and standards to enable the safe use and handling of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The program also conducts safety activities focused on promoting safety practices among U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) projects and the development of information resources and best practices. Reviewers recognized that the program continues to provide strong support in the following

166

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED D: PROJECTS NOT REVIEWED 552 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report List of Projects Not Reviewed Project ID Project Title Principal Investigator Name Organization PD-004 Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming Stefan Czernik National Renewable Energy Laboratory PD-013 Electrolyzer Development for the Copper-Chlorine Thermochemical Cycle Michele Lewis Argonne National Laboratory PD-016 Oil-Free Centrifugal Hydrogen Compression Technology Demonstration Hooshang Heshmat Mohawk Innovative Technology PD-017 Development of a Centrifugal Hydrogen Pipeline Gas Compressor Frank Di Bella Concepts NREC PD-021 Development of High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Tank for Storage and Gaseous Truck Delivery Don Baldwin Hexagon Lincoln PD-027 Solar High-Temperature Water Splitting

167

REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......documentation, improvement and evaluation. Also discussed are the relative merits of alignment to the standard as opposed to achieving full certification...frustrating if these issues had been dealt with before publishing. Nick Dunn 8/10 9/10 7/10...

Project Management for IT-related Projects (Second Edition) ? M & A Integration: How to do it ? Pegasus: The Seminal Early Computer ? The Computer Incident Response Planning Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information at Risk ? Interop – The Promise; Perils of Highly Interconnected Systems ? Business continuity management systems

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PROGRAM COMMENTS PROGRAM COMMENTS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 529 Program Comments Provided by Reviewers Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Comments Hydrogen Production 1. Was the program area adequately covered? Were important issues and challenges identified? Was progress clearly presented in comparison to the previous year? (Include information presented in the plenary and/or session overview presentations of the program if appropriate.) The Hydrogen Production program area was very well covered-the important issues (including material performance and capital costs for all production pathways) and challenges were clearly described and progress was shown on examples for all research fields (including novel hydrogen production methods)

169

International Review of Frameworks for Impact Evaluation of Appliance Standards, Labeling, and Incentives  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Evaluation, Measurement and Verification Approaches Usedan Update of BPA’s Measurement and Verification Protocols. ”Evaluation, Measurement and Verification (EM&V) Standard:

Zhou, Nan

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 This report provides policymakers with guidance as they examine past and future restructuring efforts and seek to determine how competitive markets can be of benefit to customers. Industrial and larger commercial customers may benefit from competitive markets, while residential and small commercial customers may not benefit unless legislators focus specifically on their needs. But it also has become evident that even the largest customers will save money only if the wholesale market functions smoothly. State policymakers have at their disposal numerous options that may enable both retail and wholesale power markets, but even five years into the experiment, it has yet to be determined which state policies will be most

171

Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 This report provides policymakers with guidance as they examine past and future restructuring efforts and seek to determine how competitive markets can be of benefit to customers. Industrial and larger commercial customers may benefit from competitive markets, while residential and small commercial customers may not benefit unless legislators focus specifically on their needs. But it also has become evident that even the largest customers will save money only if the wholesale market functions smoothly. State policymakers have at their disposal numerous options that may enable both retail and wholesale power markets, but even five years into the experiment, it has yet to be determined which state policies will be most

172

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION 442 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Market Transformation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Market Transformation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Market Transformation Program: The purpose of the Market Transformation program is to spur market growth for domestically produced hydrogen and fuel cell systems. By supporting increased sales in key early markets, this program helps to identify and overcome non-technical barriers to commercial deployment and to reduce the life cycle costs of fuel cell power by helping to achieve economies of scale. The current focus of the Market Transformation program is to build on past successes in lift truck and emergency backup power applications (part of the U.S. Department of Energy's [DOE's]

173

The CFE Treaty: In retrospect and under review  

SciTech Connect

The Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty is considered the cornerstone of European security. To verify the initial declarations of holdings, the obligatory reductions and the residual equipment levels, a system was established of regular periodic on-site inspections. The author examines the role of the treaty on European security.

Mendelsohn, J.

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

Timed CSP: A Retrospective Joel Ouaknine 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

APC 2005 Timed CSP: A Retrospective Jo¨el Ouaknine 1 Oxford University Computing Laboratory, UK Timed CSP, from its inception nearly twenty years ago to very recent semantical and algorithmic developments. Key words: Process algebra, Timed CSP. Timed CSP was first proposed in 1986 by Reed and Roscoe

Ouaknine, Joël

175

NASA -RETROSPECTIVE PLAN PROGRESS January 2013  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

NASA - RETROSPECTIVE PLAN PROGRESS January 2013 Page | 1 PENDING ACTIONS Agency/Subagency RIN /OMB) Progress updates and anticipated accomplishments Notes 1. NASA/Human Capital Management AD88 Aeronautics make nonsubstantive changes to provide current information of NASA's organizations. Part 1201 describes

Waliser, Duane E.

176

NASA -RETROSPECTIVE PLAN PROGRESS SEPTEMBER 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

NASA - RETROSPECTIVE PLAN PROGRESS SEPTEMBER 2012 Page | 1 PENDING ACTIONS Agency/Subagency RIN groups) Progress updates and anticipated accomplishments Notes 1. NASA/Procurement AD81 Non Procurement Administrative corrections made to align with NASA's current operations and/or to comply with external

Waliser, Duane E.

177

NASA Retrospective Plan Progress PENDING ACTIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page | 1 NASA Retrospective Plan Progress May 2012 PENDING ACTIONS Agency/Subagency RIN /OMB) Progress updates and anticipated accomplishments Notes 1. NASA/Procurement AD60 NASA Grant and Cooperative Agreement: Change Procedures for Letter of Credit Advance Payments This rule revises the NASA Grant

Waliser, Duane E.

178

INVESTIGATION Retrospective View of North American Potato  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

INVESTIGATION Retrospective View of North American Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Breeding in the 20, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706 ABSTRACT Cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), a vegetatively propagated explore the effects of potato breeding at the genome level, we used 8303 single-nucleotide polymorphism

Douches, David S.

179

Technical Letter Report: Evaluation and Analysis of a Few International Periodic Safety Review Summary Reports  

SciTech Connect

At the request of the United States (U.S.) government, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assembled a team of 20 senior safety experts to review the regulatory framework for the safety of operating nuclear power plants in the United States. This review focused on the effectiveness of the regulatory functions implemented by the NRC and on its commitment to nuclear safety and continuous improvement. One suggestion resulting from that review was that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) incorporate lessons learned from periodic safety reviews (PSRs) performed in other countries as an input to the NRC’s assessment processes. In the U.S., commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) are granted an initial 40-year operating license, which may be renewed for additional 20-year periods, subject to complying with regulatory requirements. The NRC has established a framework through its inspection, and operational experience processes to ensure the safe operation of licensed nuclear facilities on an ongoing basis. In contrast, most other countries do not impose a specific time limit on the operating licenses for NPPs, they instead require that the utility operating the plant perform PSRs, typically at approximately 10-year intervals, to assure continued safe operation until the next assessment. The staff contracted with Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) to perform a pilot review of selected translated PSR assessment reports and related documentation from foreign nuclear regulatory authorities to identify any potential new regulatory insights regarding license renewal-related topics and NPP operating experience (OpE). A total of 14 PSR assessment documents from 9 countries were reviewed. For all of the countries except France, individual reports were provided for each of the plants reviewed. In the case of France, three reports were provided that reviewed the performance assessment of thirty-four 900-MWe reactors of similar design commissioned between 1978 and 1988. All of the reports reviewed were the regulator’s assessment of the PSR findings rather than the original PSR report, and all but one were English translations from the original language. In these reviews, it was found that most of the countries base their regulatory guidance to some extent (and often to a large extent) on U.S. design codes and standards, NRC regulatory guidance, and U.S. industry guidance. In addition, many of the observed operational technical issues and OpE events reported for U.S. reactors are also cited in the PSR reports. The PSR reports also identified a number of potential technical material/component performance issues and OpE events that are not commonly reported for U.S. plants.

Chopra, Omesh K. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division; Diercks, Dwight R. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Nuclear Engineering Division; Ma, David Chia-Chiun [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division; Garud, Yogendra S. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Environmental Science Division

2013-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

180

External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process September 2009 Monica C. Regalbuto Office of Waste Processing DOE/EM Kevin G. Brown Vanderbilt University and CRESP David W. DePaoli Oak Ridge National Laboratory Candido Pereira Argonne National Laboratory John R. Shultz Office of Waste Processing DOE/EM External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process September 2009 Acknowledgements The Review Team thanks Mr. Glyn Trenchard, Team Lead for Planning and Coordination Waste Disposition Project, U.S. Department of Energy--Office of River Protection, Mr. Paul Rutland, RPP System Planning Manager for Washington River Protection Solutions, and Mr. Ernie Lee,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Peer Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Peer Review ... Peer review, as used here, refers to the evaluation of research (primarily basic research) proposals by scientists who are the professional peers of the investigator seeking a grant. ...

HOWARD J. SANDERS

1982-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

182

Evaluation of Commercially AvailableHelicobacter pylori Serology Kits: a Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...a Review R. J. F. Laheij H. Straatman J. B. M. J. Jansen A. L. M. Verbeek Department of Gastroenterology, University...R. J. F. Witteman E. M. Bloemberg P. de Koning R. W. Jansen J. B. M. J. Verbeek A. L. M. Short-term follow-up...

R. J. F. Laheij; H. Straatman; J. B. M. J. Jansen; A. L. M. Verbeek

1998-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report: May 14-18, 2012, Arlington, VA  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the fiscal year (FY) 2012 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 14-18, 2012, in Arlington, VA.

Not Available

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Review of Evaluation, Measurement and Verification Approaches Used to Estimate the Load Impacts and Effectiveness of Energy Efficiency Programs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LBNL-3277E LBNL-3277E ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY Review of Evaluation, Measurement and Verification Approaches Used to Estimate the Load Impacts and Effectiveness of Energy Efficiency Programs Mike Messenger*, Ranjit Bharvirkar*, Bill Golemboski*, Charles A. Goldman**, Steven R. Schiller*** *Itron, Inc., **Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, ***Schiller Consulting, Inc. Environmental Energy Technologies Division April 2010 The work described in this report was funded by the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE); Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02- 05CH11231. Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United

185

International Review of Frameworks for Impact Evaluation of Appliance Standards, Labeling, and Incentives  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Authority, 2004, “ New York Energy $mart Program EvaluationResearch. [NYSERDA] New York State Energy Research andOn the other hand, New York’s energy efficiency programs

Zhou, Nan

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand - Tim Mount  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluating the Effects of Managing Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy Resources Locally on System Performance and Costs Tim Mount and Ray Zimmerman Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Alejandro Dominguez-Garcia Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign CERTS Review, Cornell, August 7-8, 2012 An NSF I/UCRC Collaborative Research on the Smart Grid PSERC Researchers at Cornell Engineers Economists Lindsay Anderson Wooyoung Jeon* Hsiao-Dong Chiang Alberto Lamadrid* Andrew Hunter Jung Youn Mo* Bob Thomas Surin Maneevitjit* Lang Tong Tim Mount Max Zhang Dick Schuler Ray Zimmerman Bill Schulze + Hao Lu* Judy Cardell, Smith College +

187

Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investment in Photovoltai...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

(DOE), Harin Ullal (NREL), and Ken Zweibel (George Washington University). Gretchen Jordan (Study Project Manager, Sandia National Laboratories) and Rosalie Ruegg (TIA...

188

General Evaluation SOP 6-26 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EERE) OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EERE) STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (SOP) Quality Assurance for General Program Evaluation Studies (June 26, 2006) 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 Purposes: The purposes of this SOP are to: 1.1.1 Ensure that general program evaluation studies are performed well and have credibility with program managers, EERE Senior Management, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Congress, and other stakeholders. 1.1.2 Provide a companion to the existing EERE SOP on "Peer Review Best Practices and Procedures" that addresses independence and quality assurance procedures for evaluations that provide information not obtainable using the peer review method (e.g., retrospective impact and cost-benefit assessments). 1 1.2

189

European experiences with white certificate obligations: A critical review of existing evaluations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

evaluations Louis-Gaëtan GIRAUDET and Dominique FINON (CIRED) Pre-print, Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy Abstract White certificate obligations impose energy savings targets on energy companies and allow them to trade energy savings certificates. They can be seen as a means of internalizing energy

Boyer, Edmond

190

Review of Evaluation, Measurement and Verification Approaches Used to Estimate the Load Impacts and Effectiveness of Energy Efficiency Programs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Evaluation, Measurement and Verification Approaches Usedof Evaluation, Measurement and Verification Approaches UsedEvaluation, measurement, and verification National Action

Messenger, Mike

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

191

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

A: ATTENDEE LIST A: ATTENDEE LIST FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 511 Attendee List: 2013 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Last Name First Name Organization Abdel-Baset Tarek Chrysler Group LLC Abraham Judi Conference Management Associates, Inc. Aceves Salvador Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Adams Jesse U.S. Department of Energy, Golden Field Office Adzic Radoslav Brookhaven National Laboratory Afzal Kareem PDC Machines Agar Ertan Drexel University Agrawal Nisha Defense Production Act Committee Ahluwalia Rajesh Argonne National Laboratory Ahmed Aysha National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ahmed Shabbir Argonne National Laboratory Ahn Channing U.S. Department of Energy (IPA from California Institute of Technology) Ahn Sang Hyun National Institute of Standards and Technology

192

Chapter 29 - Portfolio and Project Planning and Management in the Drug Discovery, Evaluation, Development, and Regulatory Review Process  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Drug discovery, evaluation, development, and regulatory review are complex, lengthy, and costly processes that involve in excess of 10,000 interdependent activities. In order to be successful in biopharmaceutical new product development, one needs a set of general principles that provide guidance in the construction of a Research and Development (R&D) Portfolio, the construction of individual Product Development Plans, and the subsequent updates required to keep the portfolio and product development plans current as learning occurs. The following five Principles of Optimal Product Development form the basis for defining a decision-based operational model, identifying and quantifying the critical information required at each major decision-point, projecting the probabilities of various outcomes, and informing key stakeholders (management, board, and investors) with the clear and concise status information that is needed for effective product development governance.

Charles Grudzinskas; Charles T. Gombar

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report: June 16-20, 2014, Washington, D.C.  

SciTech Connect

The fiscal year (FY) 2014 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), in conjunction with DOE's Vehicle Technologies Office AMR, was held from June 16-20, 2014, at the Washington Marriott Wardman Park in Washington, D.C. This report is a summary of comments by AMR peer reviewers about the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE).

Not Available

2014-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for the Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents, July 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

<: <: iisS Offlct of Hulth , S.ftly ind St curity OFFICE OF SAFETY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT EVALUATIONS PROTOCOL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF CRITERIA AND REVIEW APPROACH DOCUMENTS July 2013 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for the Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents July 2013 Reviewed by: 1 .. ~~·\? Approved by: William E. Mi.lier Date Deputy Director Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight /\ Thomas R. Stak~r Deputy Director for Oversight Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security

195

Retrospective and prospective decomposition analysis of Chinese  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and prospective decomposition analysis of Chinese and prospective decomposition analysis of Chinese manufacturing energy use and policy implications Title Retrospective and prospective decomposition analysis of Chinese manufacturing energy use and policy implications Publication Type Journal Article Year of Publication 2013 Authors Hasanbeigi, Ali, Lynn K. Price, Cecilia Fino-Chen, Hongyou Lu, and Jing Ke Journal Energy Policy Date Published 09/2013 Keywords Chinese manufacturing, Decomposition Analysis, energy intensity Abstract Aims The industrial sector dominates the China's total energy consumption, accounting for about 70% of energy use in 2010. Hence, this study aims to investigate the development path of China's industrial sector which will greatly affect future energy demand and dynamics of not only China, but the entire world.

196

Comment to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers Comment to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers Comment by Cameco Resources On Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (July 27, 2010), Section 934 Rule Making. As discussed below, Cameco believes that producers and providers of uranium concentrates and UF6 conversion services, whether directly or as an intermediary, should be excluded from the definition of nuclear supplier. In this regard, Cameco generally agrees with the comments submitted by the Nuclear Energy Institute ("NEI") on behalf of its members; however, Cameco disagrees with the implication of NEl's comments that producers of uranium concentrates and providers of conversion services should be included in the

197

Health, Ageing and Ethnicity: A Retrospective and Prospects  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Health, Ageing and Ethnicity: A Retrospective and Prospects Naina Patel, PhD. Dr. Patel called Minority Elderly Care (MEC) under the EC 5th Framework Research Programme. Formerly the UK

198

Report of the Peer Review Panel on the early site suitability evaluation of the Potential Repository Site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Yucca mountain Site Characterization Project Office (YMPO) assigned Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), the Technical and Management Support Services (T&MSS) contractor to the YmPo, the task of conducting an Early Site Suitability Evaluation (ESSE) of the Yucca mountain site as a potential site for a high-level radioactive waste repository. First, the assignment called for the development of a method to evaluate a single site against the DOE General Guidelines for Recommendation of Sites for Nuclear Waste Repositories, 10 CFR Part 960. Then, using this method, an evaluation team, the ESSE Core Team, of senior YMP scientists, engineers, and technical experts, evaluated new information obtained about the site since publication of the final Environmental Assessment (DOE, 1986) to determine if new suitability/unsuitability findings could be recommended. Finally, the Core Team identified further information and analyses needed to make final determinations for each of the guidelines. As part of the task, an independent peer review of the ESSE report has been conducted. Expertise was solicited that covered the entire spectrum of siting guidelines in 10 CFR Part 960 in order to provide a complete, in-depth critical review of the data evaluated and cited in the ESSE report, the methods used to evaluate the data, and the conclusions and recommendations offered by the report. Fourteen nationally recognized technical experts (Table 2) served on the Peer Review Panel. The comments from the Panel and the responses prepared by the ESSE Core Team, documented on formal Comment Response Forms, constitute the body of this document.

NONE

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

Technical review and evaluation of the economics of water desalination: Current and future challenges for better water supply sustainability  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Desalination capacity has rapidly increased in the last decade because of the increase in water demand and a significant reduction in desalination cost as a result of significant technological advances, especially in the reverse osmosis process. The cost of desalinated seawater has fallen below US$0.50/m3 for a large scale seawater reverse osmosis plant at a specific location and conditions while in other locations the cost is 50% higher (US$1.00/m3) for a similar facility. In addition to capital and operating costs, other parameters such as local incentives or subsidies may also contribute to the large difference in desalted water cost between regions and facilities. Plant suppliers and consultants have their own cost calculation methodologies, but they are confidential and provide water costs with different accuracies. The few existing costing methodologies and software packages such as WTCost© and DEEP provide an estimated cost with different accuracies and their applications are limited to specific conditions. Most of the available cost estimation tools are of the black box type, which provide few details concerning the parameters and methodologies applied for local conditions. Many desalination plants built recently have greater desalinated water delivery costs caused by special circumstances, such as plant remediation or upgrades, local variation in energy costs, and site-specific issues in raw materials costs (e.g., tariffs and transportation). Therefore, the availability of a more transparent and unique methodology for estimating the cost will help in selecting an appropriate desalination technology suitable for specific locations with consideration of all the parameters influencing the cost. A techno-economic evaluation and review of the costing aspects and the main parameters influencing the total water cost produced by different desalination technologies are herein presented in detail. Some recent developments, such as the increase of unit capacity, improvements in process design and materials, and the use of hybrid systems have contributed to cost reduction as well as reduction in energy consumption. The development of new and emerging low-energy desalination technologies, such as adsorption desalination, will have an impact on cost variation estimation in the future.

Noreddine Ghaffour; Thomas M. Missimer; Gary L. Amy

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Review of Evaluation, Measurement and Verification Approaches Used to Estimate the Load Impacts and Effectiveness of Energy Efficiency Programs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

best practices in the construction trades that install energy efficiencyenergy efficiency evaluation plans and studies in various states; Develop and disseminate best practicesbest practices” guides and case studies on evaluation planning and methods for energy efficiency

Messenger, Mike

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

The review process used by U.S. health care plans to evaluate new medical technology for coverage  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

RESULTS: In 96% of plans, MDs take part in the medical policy review process for new technology. However, MDs ... over coverage decisions in only 27% of plans. Indemnity plans are more likely to ...

Claudia A. Steiner MD; MPH…

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

Program Evaluation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Evaluation: Background and Methods Evaluation: Background and Methods Definition of evaluation: the process of determining the worth or merit of something; if "something" is a program, then it's "program evaluation." Other types of evaluation include: product evaluation (most widely practiced, e.g., Consumer Reports); personnel evaluation; research evaluation; policy studies; art, movie, play, and book reviews. Program evaluation is NOT the same as research although they share many characteristics--Both: Start with questions Use similar methods Provide similar information Program evaluation focuses on decisions. Research focuses on answering questions about phenomena to discover new knowledge and test theories/hypotheses. Research is aimed at truth. Evaluation is aimed at

203

Review of models used for determining consequences of UF{sub 6} release: Development of model evaluation criteria. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

The objective of this study is to examine the usefulness and effectiveness of currently existing models that simulate the release of uranium hexafluoride from UF{sub 6}-handling facilities, subsequent reactions of UF{sub 6} with atmospheric moisture, and the dispersion of UF{sub 6} and reaction products in the atmosphere. The study evaluates screening-level and detailed public-domain models that were specifically developed for UF{sub 6} and models that were originally developed for the treatment of dense gases but are applicable to UF{sub 6} release, reaction, and dispersion. The model evaluation process is divided into three specific tasks: model-component evaluation; applicability evaluation; and user interface and quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) evaluation. Within the model-component evaluation process, a model`s treatment of source term, thermodynamics, and atmospheric dispersion are considered and model predictions are compared with actual observations. Within the applicability evaluation process, a model`s applicability to Integrated Safety Analysis, Emergency Response Planning, and Post-Accident Analysis, and to site-specific considerations are assessed. Finally, within the user interface and QA/QC evaluation process, a model`s user-friendliness, presence and clarity of documentation, ease of use, etc. are assessed, along with its handling of QA/QC. This document presents the complete methodology used in the evaluation process.

Nair, S.K.; Chambers, D.B.; Park, S.H.; Hoffman, F.O. [Senes Oak Ridge, Inc., TN (United States). Center for Risk Analysis

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Publication 9285.7-01D Publication 9285.7-01D January 1998 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments) Interim Office of Emergency and Remedial Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Revision No. 0 ii January 1998 NOTICE This document provides guidance to EPA staff. The guidance is designed to communicate National policy on the planning, reporting and review of Superfund risk assessments. The document does not, however, substitute for EPA's statutes or regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it cannot impose legally-binding requirements on EPA, States, or the regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based upon

205

Review and evaluation of updated research on the health effects associated with low-dose ionising radiation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......genome-wide scan, there are now plans to expand this search genome...scientific support of future regulatory and policy actions. Specific...scientific support of future regulatory and policy actions. FUNDING...More information on this review can be found at www.epri......

Lawrence T. Dauer; Antone L. Brooks; David G. Hoel; William F. Morgan; Daniel Stram; Phung Tran

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

Timed CSP: A Retrospective Jo el Ouaknine 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

APC 2005 Timed CSP: A Retrospective JoË? el Ouaknine 1 Oxford University Computing Laboratory, UK Timed CSP, from its inception nearly twenty years ago to very recent semantical and algorithmic developments. Key words: Process algebra, Timed CSP. Timed CSP was first proposed in 1986 by Reed and Roscoe

Ouaknine, Joël

207

Review and evaluation of the RELAP5YA computer code and the Vermont Yankee LOCA (Loss-of-Coolant Accident) licensing analysis model for use in small and large break BWR (Boiling Water Reactor) LOCAS  

SciTech Connect

A review has been completed of the RELAP5YA computer code to determine its acceptability for performing licensing analyses. The review was limited to Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) reactor applications. In addition, a Loss-Of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) licensing analysis method, using the RELAP5YA computer code, has been reviewed. This method is applicable to the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station to perform full break spectra LOCA and fuel cycle independent analyses. The review of the RELAP5YA code consisted of an evaluation of all Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) incorporated modifications to the RELAP5/MOD1 Cycle 18 computer code from which the licensing version of the code originated. Qualifying separate and integral effects assessment calculations were reviewed to evaluate the validity and proper implementation of the various added models. The LOCA licensing method was assessed by reviewing two RELAP5YA system input models and evaluating several small and large break qualifying transient calculations. A review of the RELAP5YA code modifications and their assessments, as well as the submitted LOCA licensing method, is given and the results of the review are provided.

Jones, J.L.

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Review of Evaluation, Measurement and Verification Approaches Used to Estimate the Load Impacts and Effectiveness of Energy Efficiency Programs  

SciTech Connect

Public and private funding for end-use energy efficiency actions is expected to increase significantly in the United States over the next decade. For example, Barbose et al (2009) estimate that spending on ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs in the U.S. could increase from $3.1 billion in 2008 to $7.5 and 12.4 billion by 2020 under their medium and high scenarios. This increase in spending could yield annual electric energy savings ranging from 0.58% - 0.93% of total U.S. retail sales in 2020, up from 0.34% of retail sales in 2008. Interest in and support for energy efficiency has broadened among national and state policymakers. Prominent examples include {approx}$18 billion in new funding for energy efficiency programs (e.g., State Energy Program, Weatherization, and Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants) in the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Increased funding for energy efficiency should result in more benefits as well as more scrutiny of these results. As energy efficiency becomes a more prominent component of the U.S. national energy strategy and policies, assessing the effectiveness and energy saving impacts of energy efficiency programs is likely to become increasingly important for policymakers and private and public funders of efficiency actions. Thus, it is critical that evaluation, measurement, and verification (EM&V) is carried out effectively and efficiently, which implies that: (1) Effective program evaluation, measurement, and verification (EM&V) methodologies and tools are available to key stakeholders (e.g., regulatory agencies, program administrators, consumers, and evaluation consultants); and (2) Capacity (people and infrastructure resources) is available to conduct EM&V activities and report results in ways that support program improvement and provide data that reliably compares achieved results against goals and similar programs in other jurisdictions (benchmarking). The National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency (2007) presented commonly used definitions for EM&V in the context of energy efficiency programs: (1) Evaluation (E) - The performance of studies and activities aimed at determining the effects and effectiveness of EE programs; (2) Measurement and Verification (M&V) - Data collection, monitoring, and analysis associated with the calculation of gross energy and demand savings from individual measures, sites or projects. M&V can be a subset of program evaluation; and (3) Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification (EM&V) - This term is frequently seen in evaluation literature. EM&V is a catchall acronym for determining both the effectiveness of program designs and estimates of load impacts at the portfolio, program and project level. This report is a scoping study that assesses current practices and methods in the evaluation, measurement and verification (EM&V) of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs, with a focus on methods and practices currently used for determining whether projected (ex-ante) energy and demand savings have been achieved (ex-post). M&V practices for privately-funded energy efficiency projects (e.g., ESCO projects) or programs where the primary focus is greenhouse gas reductions were not part of the scope of this study. We identify and discuss key purposes and uses of current evaluations of end-use energy efficiency programs, methods used to evaluate these programs, processes used to determine those methods; and key issues that need to be addressed now and in the future, based on discussions with regulatory agencies, policymakers, program administrators, and evaluation practitioners in 14 states and national experts in the evaluation field. We also explore how EM&V may evolve in a future in which efficiency funding increases significantly, innovative mechanisms for rewarding program performance are adopted, the role of efficiency in greenhouse gas mitigation is more closely linked, and programs are increasingly funded from multiple sources often with multiple program administrators and in

Messenger, Mike; Bharvirkar, Ranjit; Golemboski, Bill; Goldman, Charles A.; Schiller, Steven R.

2010-04-14T23:59:59.000Z

209

A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of A.O. Smith...

210

Review of models used for determining consequences of UF{sub 6} release: Model evaluation report. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect

Three uranium hexafluoride-(UF{sub 6}-) specific models--HGSYSTEM/UF{sub 6}, Science Application International Corporation, and RTM-96; three dense-gas models--DEGADIS, SLAB, and the Chlorine Institute methodology; and one toxic chemical model--AFTOX--are evaluated on their capabilities to simulate the chemical reactions, thermodynamics, and atmospheric dispersion of UF{sub 6} released from accidents at nuclear fuel-cycle facilities, to support Integrated Safety Analysis, Emergency Response Planning, and Post-Accident Analysis. These models are also evaluated for user-friendliness and for quality assurance and quality control features, to ensure the validity and credibility of the results. Model performance evaluations are conducted for the three UF{sub 6}-specific models, using field data on releases of UF{sub 6} and other heavy gases. Predictions from the HGSYSTEM/UF{sub 6} and SAIC models are within an order of magnitude of the field data, but the SAIC model overpredicts beyond an order of magnitude for a few UF{sub 6}-specific data points. The RTM-96 model provides overpredictions within a factor of 3 for all data points beyond 400 m from the source. For one data set, however, the RTM-96 model severely underpredicts the observations within 200 m of the source. Outputs of the models are most sensitive to the meteorological parameters at large distances from the source and to certain source-specific and meteorological parameters at distances close to the source. Specific recommendations are being made to improve the applicability and usefulness of the three models and to choose a specific model to support the intended analyses. Guidance is also provided on the choice of input parameters for initial dilution, building wake effects, and distance to completion of UF{sub 6} reaction with water.

Nair, S.K.; Chambers, D.B.; Park, S.H.; Radonjic, Z.R.; Coutts, P.T.; Lewis, C.J.; Hammonds, J.S.; Hoffman, F.O. [Senes Oak Ridge, Inc., TN (United States). Center for Risk Analysis

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Review Draft Review Draft  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Review Draft Review Draft Columbia Basin White Sturgeon Planning Framework Prepared a favorable review of specific sturgeon projects but noted that an effective basin-wide management plan passage. A planning framework (this document) was drafted based on a review and synthesis of published

212

Assessment of Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification Methods...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Assessment of Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification Methods - 2014 BTO Peer Review Assessment of Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification Methods - 2014 BTO Peer Review...

213

Syphilis: Review with Emphasis on Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Some Biologic Features  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...titers in response to standard penicillin treatment...offered a retrospective review of response to standard therapy in HIV-infected...disease, after receiving standard therapy for syphilis...five-point syphilis control plan including public education...

Ameeta E. Singh; Barbara Romanowski

1999-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

214

Fuel Cell Technologies Program Overview: 2010 Annual Merit Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Overview: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Fuel Cell Technologies Program Overview: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Presentation by Richard...

215

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting...

216

Systematic Review of the Value of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Musculoskeletal Imaging in the Evaluation of Response to Treatment of Gout  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

AbstractBackground Imaging may be useful for monitoring response to therapy. Within the OMERACT proposal for the core set domains for outcome measures in chronic gout, serum urate levels, recurrence of gouty flares, tophus regression, and joint damage imaging have been included, among other proposed issues. Objectives To perform a systematic literature review of the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) on assessment of treatment response in patients with gout. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (up to February 2012), and abstracts presented at the 2010 and 2011 meetings of the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism were searched for treatment studies of any duration and therapeutic options, examining the ability of MRI/US to assess treatment response in gouty patients. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, cohort and case-control studies and validation studies were included. Quality was appraised using validated scales. Results There were only 3 US published studies in the literature that analyzed US utility on assessment of response to treatment in patients with gout. All of them were prospective case studies with a small number of patients and they were reviewed in a detailed manner. A total of 36 patients with gout were examined with US. All of them had a baseline serum urate >6 mg/dL. US features of gout (double contour sign, hyperechoic spots in synovial fluid, hyperechoic cloudy areas, tophus diameter and volume) achieved significant reduction in patients who reached the objective of uricemia ?6 mg/dL in all the studies; however, patients in whom levels did not drop below 6 mg/dL had no change of US features of gout. Other parameters evaluated in one study included ESR, CRP, number of tender joints (TRN), number of swollen joints, and pain score (SP). All of them decreased with uricemia reduction, but only TRN and SP were statistically significant. No data were found on the value of MRI on treatment response assessment in patients with gout. Conclusions The improvement in ultrasound features shows concurrent validity with uric acid reduction. According to the published evidence, US can be a useful tool for monitoring treatment of gouty patients, although more research is needed. The value of MRI on treatment response assessment in patients with gout remains to be determined.

Virginia Villaverde; María Piedad Rosario; Estíbaliz Loza; Fernando Pérez

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

Earthquake prediction: a critical review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......prediction evaluation standards applied to the VAN...An International Review, edsSimpson D...before earthquakes: A review of possible sensory...Japan. U.S. plan Joint carthquake...prediction evaluation standards applied to the VAN...An Internationai Review, eds Simpson, D......

Robert J. Geller

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

218

Help Sheet for Faculty Evaluation Process (Fall 2013) This document is intended to assist faculty and staff as they prepare materials for the Individual Performance Review (IPR) and the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

faculty and staff as they prepare materials for the Individual Performance Review (IPR) and the faculty, postdoctoral fellows) are evaluated at the department level only. In a nutshell, those who must submit an IPR and Green forms, and IPR and CV. Just as with tenure track faculty, a judgment of merit does not mean

Chu, Xi

219

Help Sheet for Faculty Evaluation Process (Fall 2012) This document is intended to assist faculty and staff as they prepare materials for the Individual Performance Review (IPR) and the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

faculty and staff as they prepare materials for the Individual Performance Review (IPR) and the faculty, postdoctoral fellows) are evaluated at the department level only. In a nutshell, those who must submit an IPR faculty. Submit Ivory and Green forms, and IPR and CV. Just as with tenure track faculty, a judgment

Vonessen, Nikolaus

220

The Importance of Peer Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Importance of Peer Review ... Because it requires reviewers and Editors to make judgments and to evaluate and criticize the work of their peers, the Editors carefully choose reviewers using the following criteria: ... Often the authors of a manuscript that is rejected benefit most from these peer reviews that describe shortcomings and approaches to resolving them. ...

Heijia L. Wheeler; Willis B. Wheeler Associate Editorial Office Journal of Agricultural; Food Chemistry

2006-11-22T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

EIA-Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review-Revisions to Gross Domestic  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Revisions to Gross Domestic Product and Implications for the Comparisons The concept of GDP is a commonly used measure of economic activity. It can be expressed in nominal dollars or, with the use of a matched price index to remove inflation, in "real" terms. Movements in nominal GDP show how the value of goods and services produced by the United States changes over time, while real GDP is a measure of how the physical production of the economy has grown. While simple in concept, the projecting of nominal and real GDP and the interpretation of these projected measures relative to "history" is not simple or straightforward. The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) within the U.S. Department of Commerce continually adjusts the National Income and Product Accounts data, with comprehensive revisions completed every 4 or 5 years. The last four major revisions (1985, 1991, 1995, and 1999) incorporated definitional and statistical changes, as well as emphasizing new ways of presenting the data. Also, prior to AEO1993 aggregate economic activity was measured and projected on the basis of Gross National Product (GNP) as opposed to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). For the period from 1984 through 2004, nominal GNP is on average approximately 0.45 percent above nominal GDP.

222

Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, DOE sought public comments on whether...

223

E-Print Network 3.0 - aircraft retrospective cohort Sample Search...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

or cross-sectional or retrospective or prospective in the bottom row of your search. Retrieving Research Source: MacMillan, Andrew - Department of Biochemistry,...

224

E-Print Network 3.0 - approaches retrospective comparison Sample...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

appliance remanufacturing relative to purchasing Summary: . 2. Retrospective life cycle energy comparison of a newly produced dishwasher and a remanufactured... the life cycle...

225

Acculturative tension between parents and adolescents in Latino households| A retrospective study of young adult Latinos.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

?? This retrospective study explored young adult Latinos' perceptions of acculturative tension between themselves and their parents and how that tension, if any, affected their… (more)

Leon, Nancy

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

E-Print Network 3.0 - africa retrospective analysis Sample Search...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: africa retrospective analysis Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Northwestern University Archives...

227

Review Reports | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety & Emergency Management Evaluations Safety & Emergency Management Evaluations » Review Reports Review Reports December 31, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant, December 2013 Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant December 30, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Facility - December 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program and Fire Protection Systems at the Transuranic Waste Processing Center December 13, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - December 2013 Review of the Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory December 13, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security Site, December 2013

228

Review of Particle Physics  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This biennial Review summarizes much of Particle Physics. Using data from previous editions, plus 1600 new measurements from 550 papers, we list, evaluate, and average measured properties of gauge bosons, leptons...

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

229

Advanced Vehicle Testing & Evaluation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Vehicle Testing & Evaluation Advanced Vehicle Testing & Evaluation 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

230

Advanced Vehicle Testing & Evaluation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Evaluation Advanced Vehicle Testing & Evaluation 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting...

231

Technical Review Panel Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Evaluation and Identification of future R&D on eight Advanced Reactor Concepts, conducted April - September 2012 December 2012 Public release version 2 Public release version 3 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Overview of the Technical Review Panel Process ............................................................... 5 2. Technical Review Panel Criteria ......................................................................................... 6 3. Concept Summaries ........................................................................................................... 8

232

Vehicle Technologies Program Merit Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies and Hydrogen Programs Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, June 7-11, 2010 -- Washington D.C.

233

SuperTruck Program: Engine Project Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

234

Review of particle properties  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This review of the properties of leptons, mesons, and baryons is an updating of the Review of Particle Properties, Particle Data Group [Phys. Lett. 111B (1982)]. Data are evaluated, listed, averaged, and summarized in tables. Numerous tables, figures, and formulae of interest to particle physicists are also included. A data booklet is available.

C. G. Wohl; R. N. Cahn; A. Rittenberg; T. G. Trippe; G. P. Yost; F. C. Porter; J. J. Hernandez; L. Montanet; R. E. Hendrick; R. L. Crawford; M. Roos; N. A. Törnqvist; G. Höhler; M. Aguilar-Benitez; T. Shimada; M. J. Losty; G. P. Gopal; Ch. Walck; R. E. Shrock; R. Frosch; L. D. Roper; W. P. Trower; B. Armstrong (Particle Data Group)

1984-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Book Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Copyright 2003 Book Review Book Review Book Review Frank Land 1 1 Emeritus...Economics, UK 526 BOOK REVIEWS discusses some basic concepts...the programming language Standard ML: CML (Concurrrent ML), Facile and PLAN (Packet Language for Active......

Frank Land

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

236

EMSL: External Peer Reviewers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS EXTERNAL PEER REVIEWERS Additional Information User Portal 2014 Call for Proposals 2014 Proposal Guidance 2014 Proposal Review Criteria Guidance for Letters of Intent to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call Guidance for Full Proposals to JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Call (Invited Only) 2014 Proposal Planning 2014 Proposal Summary/Extension Previous Calls External Peer Reviewers Fellowships and Awards Nufo, logo External peer reviewers are valuable contributors to EMSL's user proposals process. They provide objective evaluations of the quality of the proposals according to established review criteria, and participate on Review Panels that calibrate the proposals into a ranked order. EMSL is truly grateful to the researchers who donated their time and efforts in fiscal year 2012 to

237

Peer review in child protection  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Safeguarding children work is complex and challenging. Peer review provides a forum for paediatricians to discuss child protection cases to ensure the management of the child meets accepted standards of practice. The process involves retrospective review of cases, photo documentation, the medical report and multiagency working. It provides a culture of learning, professional development and support, with an opportunity to discuss cases in a suitable environment and to debrief following difficult cases. Clinical governance frameworks identify the importance of peer review and clinical supervision: there are increasing expectations that Health Trusts/Boards will have to provide data on attendance for external review. Both clinical supervision and peer review are forms of reflective practice and developmental activities that give practitioners the opportunity to learn from their experience and develop their expertise within clinical practice. Child protection peer review meetings with clear terms of reference should be set up in all health organisations employing paediatricians working in child protection. All paediatricians should be able to access and attend child protection peer review, supervision and support which should be identified in their job plans. Peer review is recognised as Continual Professional Development. Following discussion any change in opinion is the lead consultant's responsibility. It must be clear that peer review supports the responsible paediatrician in reaching a conclusion and does not provide a formal second opinion to be used in court. Peer review has a role to play in maintaining public and court confidence. It is the paediatrician's attendance at peer review that provides assurance to court that standards are being met, not that the specific case has been peer reviewed. Clinicians who don't attend are at risk of being perceived as maverick.

Alison Mott; Amanda Thomas

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

A retrospective survey of the use of laboratory tests to simulate internal combustion engine materials tribology problems  

SciTech Connect

Progress in the Field of tribology strongly parallels, and has always been strongly driven by, developments and needs in transportation and related industries. Testing of candidate materials for internal combustion engine applications has historically taken several routes: (1) replacement of parts in actual engines subjected to daily use, (2) testing in special, instrumented test engines, (3) and simulative testing in laboratory tribometers using relatively simple specimens. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are reviewed using historical examples. A four-decade, retrospective survey of the tribomaterials literature focused on the effectiveness of laboratory simulations for engine materials screening. Guidelines for designing and ducting successful tribology laboratory simulations will be discussed. These concepts were used to design a valve wear simulator at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Blau, P.J.

1992-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

239

Thermodynamic Evaluation of Low-Global Warming Potential Refrigerants...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Thermodynamic Evaluation of Low-Global Warming Potential Refrigerants - 2013 Peer Review Thermodynamic Evaluation of Low-Global Warming Potential Refrigerants - 2013 Peer Review...

240

Office of Enforcement - Regulatory Assistance Reviews  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Assistance Reviews Regulatory Assistance Reviews Office of Enforcement and Oversight (formerly Program Reviews) Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Reviews evaluate contractor programs for identifying, evaluating, reporting and correcting noncompliances. The objective of these reviews is to work collaboratively with sites to identify areas where program effectiveness can be improved and ensure that noncompliances are being proactively self-identified. 2013 Office of Security Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Review of Battelle at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, July 18, 2013 Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Review of L ATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, February 11, 2013 Office of Security Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Review of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review BOOK REVIEWS Book Reviews R. W. K. Odoni FIELD...Springer, 1986) 174 BOOK REVIEWS article, or more accurately...title from them. The plan is to study, for a suitably...theory, ultrafilters BOOK REVIEWS 175 and ultraproducts...procedures and non-standard structures such as higher......

R. W. K. Odoni

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...articles lucidly review the current comprehensive...efforts. the literature fairly completely...very scholarly review of the literature. R. Weil et...in the research literature. Thus Stewart's...practitioners review 32 subjects...

1975-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

243

Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis of 144 Patients  

SciTech Connect

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze the results of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) + external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods and Materials: The records of 144 patients treated with IORT, with or without, EBRT were reviewed. One hundred and thirteen patients (78.5%) were treated with IORT + EBRT and 114 patients (79.2%) were treated in conjunction with chemotherapy. The median doses of IORT and EBRT were 25 Gy and 45 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up of all 144 patients was 9.6 months (range, 0.5-69.7 months). Results: At the time of this analysis, 131 of 144 patients (91.0%) had disease recurrences. Local progression was observed in 60 patients (41.7%), and the 2-year local control (LC) rate in all patients was 44.6%. Patients treated with IORT, with or without, EBRT had significantly more favorable LC (2-year LC, 50.9%) than those treated with IORT without EBRT (p = 0.0004). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and the median survival time in all 144 patients were 14.7% and 10.5 months, respectively. Patients treated with chemotherapy had a significantly favorable OS than those treated without chemotherapy (p < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, chemotherapy use alone had a significant impact on OS and on multivariate analysis; chemotherapy use was a significant prognostic factor. Late gastrointestinal morbidity of National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria Grade 3 was observed in 2 patients (1.4%). Conclusion: IORT + EBRT yields a relatively favorable LC rate for unresectable pancreatic cancer with low frequency of severe late toxicity, and IORT combined with chemotherapy conferred a survival benefit compared with IORT without chemotherapy.

Ogawa, Kazuhiko, E-mail: kogawa@med.u-ryukyu.ac.j [Department of Radiology, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa (Japan); Karasawa, Katsuyuki [Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo (Japan); Ito, Yoshinori [Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo (Japan); Ogawa, Yoshihiro; Jingu, Keiichi [Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University, Sendai (Japan); Onishi, Hiroshi; Aoki, Shinichi [Department of Radiology, Yamanashi University, Yamanashi (Japan); Wada, Hitoshi [Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University, Yamagata (Japan); Kokubo, Masaki [Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation Hospital, Kobe (Japan); Ogo, Etsuyo; Etoh, Hidehiro [Department of Radiology, Kurume University, Kurume (Japan); Kazumoto, Tomoko [Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama (Japan); Takayama, Makoto [Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyorin University, Tokyo (Japan); Nemoto, Kenji [Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University, Yamagata (Japan); Nishimura, Yasumasa [Department of Radiation Oncology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka (Japan)

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

How to Interpret Thyroid Biopsy Results: A Three-Year Retrospective Interventional Radiology Experience  

SciTech Connect

Results of thyroid biopsy determine whether thyroid nodule resection is appropriate and the extent of thyroid surgery. At our institution we use 20/22-gauge core biopsy (CBx) in conjunction with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to decrease the number of passes and improve adequacy. Occasionally, both ultrasound (US)-guided FNA and CBx yield unsatisfactory specimens. To justify clinical recommendations for these unsatisfactory thyroid biopsies, we compare rates of malignancy at surgical resection for unsatisfactory biopsy results against definitive biopsy results. We retrospectively reviewed a database of 1979 patients who had a total of 2677 FNA and 663 CBx performed by experienced interventional radiologists under US guidance from 2003 to 2006 at a tertiary-care academic center. In 451 patients who had surgery following biopsy, Fisher's exact test was used to compare surgical malignancy rates between unsatisfactory and malignant biopsy cohorts as well as between unsatisfactory and benign biopsy cohorts. We defined statistical significance at P = 0.05. We reported an overall unsatisfactory thyroid biopsy rate of 3.7% (100/2677). A statistically significant higher rate of surgically proven malignancies was found in malignant biopsy patients compared to unsatisfactory biopsy patients (P = 0.0001). The incidence of surgically proven malignancy in unsatisfactory biopsy patients was not significantly different from that in benign biopsy patients (P = 0.8625). In conclusion, an extremely low incidence of malignancy was associated with both benign and unsatisfactory thyroid biopsy results. The difference in incidence between these two groups was not statistically significant. Therefore, patients with unsatisfactory biopsy specimens can be reassured and counseled accordingly.

Oppenheimer, Jason D., E-mail: j-oppenheimer@md.northwestern.edu; Kasuganti, Deepa; Nayar, Ritu; Chrisman, Howard B.; Lewandowski, Robert J.; Nemcek, Albert A.; Ryu, Robert K., E-mail: rryu@nmff.or [Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation, Department of Radiology (United States)

2010-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

245

Mobility determination of lead isotopes in glass for retrospective radon measurements  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......al. Retention of Pb isotopes in glass surfaces for...Vierinen K. The ion guide isotope separator online...Whitlow H. J. Boron diffusion in bulk cobalt...srim.org . Mobility determination of lead isotopes in glass for retrospective......

Mikko Laitinen; Iiro Riihimäki; Jörgen Ekman; A. R. Ananda Sagari; Lennart B. Karlsson; Somjai Sangyuenyongpipat; Sergey Gorelick; Heikki Kettunen; Heikki Penttilä; Ragnar Hellborg; Timo Sajavaara; Johan Helgesson; Harry J. Whitlow

2008-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

Landscape and Home: A Sense of Place in Wisconsin Gaylord Nelson Retrospective Lecture Series  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Landscape and Home: A Sense of Place in Wisconsin Gaylord Nelson Retrospective Lecture Series be willing to launch this lecture series on "Landscape and Home, a Sense of Place in Wisconsin," they were

Sheridan, Jennifer

247

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ............................................................................................................................1 2 Regulatory Impact Review FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

248

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ..............................................................................................................................................1 2 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

249

Implications for preserving neural stem cells in whole brain radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation: a review of 2270 metastases in 488 patients  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......oligometastatic patients (WBRT plan) and extensive SCLC...to chemotherapy (PCI plan). Plans will be conducted in...in 10 fractions) and standard WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions...CONCLUSIONS Our retrospective review of 2270 metastases in......

Jue-Feng Wan; Sheng-Jian Zhang; Lu Wang; Kuai-Le Zhao

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Review of experiments to evaluate the ability of electrical heater rods to simulate nuclear fuel rod behavior during postulated loss-of-coolant accidents in light water reactors  

SciTech Connect

Issues related to using electrical fuel rod simulators to simulate nuclear fuel rod behavior during postulated loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) conditions in light water reactors are summarized. Experimental programs which will provide a data base for comparing electrical heater rod and nuclear fuel rod LOCA responses are reviewed.

McPherson, G D; Tolman, E L

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

Science Review Review Definitions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IPTS Proposal Review Ratings IPTS Proposal Review Ratings 5 Extraordinary The proposal involves cutting-edge research of great scientific importance. Proposed research will significantly advance knowledge in a specific field or scientific discipline. The characteristics of the SNS and/or HFIR are essential to the success of the proposed work. I believe this proposal must be supported with the highest priority. 4.5 Excellent to Extraordinary -- 4 Excellent The proposed research is of high quality and has potential for making an important contribution to a specific field or scientific discipline. The work is innovative and is likely to be published in a leading scientific journal. The use of SNS and/or HFIR is highly desirable for the success of the proposed work. I strongly recommend that this proposal

252

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting June 16, 2014...

253

2011 Biomass Program Peer Review Report | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2011 Biomass Program Peer Review Report 2011 Biomass Program Peer Review Report This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations resulting from the U.S. Department of...

254

2011 Biomass Program Platform Review Report: Algae | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2011 Biomass Program Platform Review Report: Algae 2011 Biomass Program Platform Review Report: Algae This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an...

255

2011 Biomass Program Plaform Peer Review: Analysis | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Plaform Peer Review: Analysis 2011 Biomass Program Plaform Peer Review: Analysis This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external...

256

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2014 Annual Merit Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer...

257

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer...

258

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2011 Annual Merit Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer...

259

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rulemaking Rulemaking Peer Review Report - Supporting Documentation Submitted Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy March 2007 Table of Contents PROJECT ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 16 SLIDE PRESENTATIONS ON JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .................................................. 104 PEER REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM.................................................................. 201 PEER REVIEW AGENDA JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .........................................................

260

Review of Particle Physics  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This biennial review summarizes much of Particle Physics. Using data from previous editions, plus 1900 new measurements from 700 papers, we list, evaluate, and average measured properties of gauge bosons, leptons, quarks, mesons, and baryons. We also summarize searches for hypothetical particles such as Higgs bosons, heavy neutrinos, and supersymmetric particles. All the particle properties and search limits are listed in Summary Tables. We also give numerous tables, figures, formulae, and reviews of topics such as the Standard Model, particle detectors, probability, and statistics. A booklet is available containing the Summary Tables and abbreviated versions of some of the other sections of this full Review.

R. M. Barnett et al.

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Human Factors Review Plan  

SciTech Connect

''Human Factors'' is concerned with the incorporation of human user considerations into a system in order to maximize human reliability and reduce errors. This Review Plan is intended to assist in the assessment of human factors conditions in existing DOE facilities. In addition to specifying assessment methodologies, the plan describes techniques for improving conditions which are found to not adequately support reliable human performance. The following topics are addressed: (1) selection of areas for review describes techniques for needs assessment to assist in selecting and prioritizing areas for review; (2) human factors engineering review is concerned with optimizing the interfaces between people and equipment and people and their work environment; (3) procedures review evaluates completeness and accuracy of procedures, as well as their usability and management; (4) organizational interface review is concerned with communication and coordination between all levels of an organization; and (5) training review evaluates training program criteria such as those involving: trainee selection, qualification of training staff, content and conduct of training, requalification training, and program management.

Paramore, B.; Peterson, L.R. (eds.)

1985-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Technology Validation: Fuel Cell Bus Evaluations | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Technology Validation: Fuel Cell Bus Evaluations Technology Validation: Fuel Cell Bus Evaluations 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and...

263

Soil washing technology evaluation  

SciTech Connect

Environmental Restoration Engineering (ERE) continues to review innovative, efficient, and cost effective technologies for SRS soil and/or groundwater remediation. As part of this effort, this technical evaluation provides review and the latest information on the technology for SRS soil remediation. Additional technology evaluation reports will be issued periodically to update these reports. The purpose of this report is to review the soil washing technology and its potential application to SRS soil remediation. To assess whether the Soil Washing technology is a viable option for SRS soil remediation, it is necessary to review the technology/process, technology advantages/limitations, performance, applications, and cost analysis.

Suer, A.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

264
265

Project Execution Plan Review Module (RM)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Project Execution Plan (PEP) Review Module (RM) is a tool that assists DOE federal project review teams in evaluating the adequacy of the PEP development and maintenance for projects of any...

266

High Efficiency Engine Systems Development and Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation

267

Medium and Heavy Duty Vehicle Field Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

268

Design and Evaluation of High Capacity Cathodes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

269

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in

270

Evaluating complex interventions in End of Life Care: the MORECare Statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

:736–743. referral and how long the effect is maintained. Postgrad Med J 2011, 87:769–775. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-111 Cite this article as: Higginson et al.: Evaluating complex interventions in End of Life Care: the MORECare Statement on good practice generated...

Higginson, Irene J; Evans, Catherine J; Grande, Gunn; Preston, Nancy; Morgan, Myfanwy; McCrone, Paul; Lewis, Penney; Fayers, Peter; Harding, Richard; Hotopf, Matthew; Murray, Scott A; Benalia, Hamid; Gysels, Marjolein; Farquhar, Morag; Todd, Chris; on behalf of MORECare

2013-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

271

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......236 BOOK REVIEWS standard results like the adjoint...concerned with con- BOOK REVIEWS 237 struction methods...groups, is needed. A review of the main concepts...are a knowledge of the standard results of linear algebra...contents and the general plan of the work may be gathered......

J. Cofman

1974-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......algebra and the book under review is a worthy addition...ten years or so. BOOK REVIEWS 99 The book has four...prime ideals, but the standard result that the nilradical...UFD if all its 100 BOOK REVIEWS invertible ideals are...of Euclid. In general plan, the volume consists......

D. Rees

1971-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

3 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report...

274

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report...

275

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of NMFS Proposal "Evaluate Hatchery Reform Principles" Dear Mr. Cassidy: This letter constitutes the ISRP's review of the revised National Marine Fisheries Service's proposal "Evaluate Hatchery Reform Principles

276

Model Validation Status Review  

SciTech Connect

The primary objective for the Model Validation Status Review was to perform a one-time evaluation of model validation associated with the analysis/model reports (AMRs) containing model input to total-system performance assessment (TSPA) for the Yucca Mountain site recommendation (SR). This review was performed in response to Corrective Action Request BSC-01-C-01 (Clark 2001, Krisha 2001) pursuant to Quality Assurance review findings of an adverse trend in model validation deficiency. The review findings in this report provide the following information which defines the extent of model validation deficiency and the corrective action needed: (1) AMRs that contain or support models are identified, and conversely, for each model the supporting documentation is identified. (2) The use for each model is determined based on whether the output is used directly for TSPA-SR, or for screening (exclusion) of features, events, and processes (FEPs), and the nature of the model output. (3) Two approaches are used to evaluate the extent to which the validation for each model is compliant with AP-3.10Q (Analyses and Models). The approaches differ in regard to whether model validation is achieved within individual AMRs as originally intended, or whether model validation could be readily achieved by incorporating information from other sources. (4) Recommendations are presented for changes to the AMRs, and additional model development activities or data collection, that will remedy model validation review findings, in support of licensing activities. The Model Validation Status Review emphasized those AMRs that support TSPA-SR (CRWMS M&O 2000bl and 2000bm). A series of workshops and teleconferences was held to discuss and integrate the review findings. The review encompassed 125 AMRs (Table 1) plus certain other supporting documents and data needed to assess model validity. The AMRs were grouped in 21 model areas representing the modeling of processes affecting the natural and engineered barriers, plus the TSPA model itself Description of the model areas is provided in Section 3, and the documents reviewed are described in Section 4. The responsible manager for the Model Validation Status Review was the Chief Science Officer (CSO) for Bechtel-SAIC Co. (BSC). The team lead was assigned by the CSO. A total of 32 technical specialists were engaged to evaluate model validation status in the 21 model areas. The technical specialists were generally independent of the work reviewed, meeting technical qualifications as discussed in Section 5.

E.L. Hardin

2001-11-28T23:59:59.000Z

277

Review of Selected Home Energy Auditing Tools  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This study reviews widely used energy audit tools that are used to evaluate home improvements and to maximize its operational and energy efficiency.

278

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Transuranic Waste...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Transuranic Waste Processing Center - September 2012 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Transuranic Waste Processing Center - September 2012 September 2012 Evaluation to...

279

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Manufacturability...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Batteries Presentation given by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

280

Readiness Review Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review Program Review Program FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: DOE/NNSA Headquarters and Field organizations and their contractors responsible for the startup and operation of nuclear facilities have defined and implemented contractual requirements to manage, evaluate, and approve the startup and restart of nuclear facilities and activities. REQUIREMENTS:  DOE Order 425.1C, Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities  DOE P 450.4, Safety Management System Policy  DOE/NNSA Safety Management Functions, Responsibilities and Authorities Manual Guidance:  DOE-STD-3006-2000, Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews  DOE-HDBK- 3012-2003, Operational Readiness Review Team Leaders Handbook  DOE G 450.4-1B, Integrated Safety Management System Guide

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Thermochemical Conversion...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Thermochemical Conversion 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Thermochemical Conversion "This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an...

282

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Integrated Biorefineries...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Integrated Biorefineries 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Integrated Biorefineries "This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an...

283

Regulation as Retrospective Ethnography: Mobile Money and the Arts of Cash  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

r-~,. Regulation as Retrospective Ethnography: Mobile Money and the Arts of Cash Bill Maurer Often proscriptions regarding the disclosure of cerlain transactions, and multi-per- son sharing of money and mobiles, an account we might set alongside other fonns of data on use cases for mobile and money. It argues

Brody, James P.

284

CPM's 20th Anniversary: A Statistical Retrospective Elena Yavorska Harris1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CPM's 20th Anniversary: A Statistical Retrospective Elena Yavorska Harris1 , Thierry Lecroq2, Lille and J.-V.Poncelet Lab, Moscow) and INRIA Lille ­ Nord Europe 1 Introduction This year the Annual, pp. 1­11, 2009. c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009 #12;2 E.Y. Harris et al. Table 1. Locations

Lonardi, Stefano

285

Sea level rise implications on shoreline changes: expectations from a retrospective analysis  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Sea level rise implications on shoreline changes: expectations from a retrospective analysis Gonéri de Recherche et de Formation en Calcul Scientifique (Cerfacs) Sea level rise is a major consequence level rise is up to 3 times the global mean rate (estimated as 3.5 mm per year since the early 1990s

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

286

Reviewer Instructions:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reviewer Instructions: Reviewer Instructions: 1. All review comments to be provided electronically using this review form. 2. Focus the review on substantive issues within your disciplinary, regulatory, or policy area. 3. Look only at the portions relevant to your agency and the land under your management. The individual land management agencies will be amending land use plans or issuing a Record of Decision, so please don't alter the other agencies' roles and responsibilities. 4. Target the review on the adequacy and reasonableness of text and analyses within your disciplinary, regulatory, or policy area. Please be aware that this is a programmatic EIS. 5. All comments should be as specific as possible. Comments such as "text unclear" or "expand" do not provide sufficient

287

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Summary: Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy - Tim Mount  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy Resources Locally on System Performance and Costs Project Lead: Tim Mount, Alejandro D. Dominguez-Garcia, Ray Zimmerman 1. Project Objective The objective of this project is to use the new multi-period version of the Cornell SuperOPF to analyze the system and economic effects of having high penetrations of renewable energy on a network and to determine effective ways to mitigate the inherent variability of these sources. With the new capabilities of the SuperOPF, it will now be possible to evaluate the effects of shifting demand from peak to off-peak periods. Previous research has shown that higher penetrations of renewables are associated with higher annual costs for conventional installed generating capacity ($/MW/Year) due to

288

Document Reviews  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of Document Reviews, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security information and document declassification efforts promote the release of information needed by an informed citizenry...

289

Environmental Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental-Review Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

290

Reciprocal Reviews  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Reciprocal Reviews Edward Relph, Place and Placelessness (Limited, In 1976, Edward Relph, a professor of geography atbase, then Edward Relph's Place and Placelessness would fall

MacCannell, Dean

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

Standard Review Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Standard Review Plan (SRP) serves as the corporate framework designed to formalize the Department of Energy (DOE) and EM institutional processes and requirements associated with the review of project activities in support of CD approvals. The SRP has been developed as a collaborative effort between EM and the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS), Office of the Under Secretary. It is modeled after similar principles used extensively and successfully by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for evaluating U.S. commercial nuclear industry licensed activities.

292

2007 Annual Peer Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2007 Annual Peer Review 2007 Annual Peer Review September 27, 2007 San Francisco, California Welcoming Remarks Imre Gyuk US Dept. of Energy DOE / ESS Program Overview (View .pdf) John Boyes Sandia National Laboratories PRESENTATIONS\ ECONOMICS - BENEFIT STUDIES Evaluating Value Propositions for Four Modular Electricity Storage Demonstrations in California (View .pdf) Jim Eyer (Distributed Utility Assoc.) Update on Benefit and Cost Comparison of Modular Energy Storage Technologies for Four Viable Value Propositions (View .pdf) Susan Schoenung (Longitude 122 West, Inc.) ECONOMICS - ENVIRONMENT BENEFITS STUDIES Emissions from Traditional & Flywheel Plants for Regulation Services (View .pdf) Rick Fioravanti (KEMA, Inc.) UTILITY & COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS

293

General Evaluation SOP 6-26 2006 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

forgeneralprogevalstudies.pdf More Documents & Publications PAE Evaluation Portfolio Peer Review EERE Program Management Guide - Chapter 7 EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004...

294

The Ethics Committee or. Reviewing  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Ethics Committee luation or. Reviewing not to build ng to calls for tender - all these tasks ions. I E 1. T Ethics and Eva (Version 2 - December 20041 ) Evaluation is an integral part of evaluation processes. The remarks which follow are the initial step in an ethical reflection on the conduct

van Tiggelen, Bart

295

Capsule Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......to provide a short succinct review of each paper in the issue...wider readership. The Capsule Reviews were compiled by Fairouz Kamareddine...the optimized implementation plan (IP) used to describe how...Architectures (OMEGA) where the standard Meta Object Facility (MOF......

Fairouz Kamareddine

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......critical nature of the review: "... I feel that...that are to be BOOK REVIEWS 575 directed to the special...events" or to the standard machinery of dice, etc...further problems. The plan of the book is conventional...with nine chapters on standard methods for discrete......

D. J. Finney

1981-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Book reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...ed.), reviewed by P. R. Grant. Enlightenment: Britain and...the quest to build the first computer, by D. Swade, reviewed by...the forerunner of the modern computer, and it is the achievement...the quest to build the first computer. Little, Brown & Co., London...

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...middle ear and internal ear. Although...volume which reviews all obtainable...upon case studies and clinical...time to the study of specific...office for review. The following...and frankly experimental. Reac-tions...nozzles, combustion chambers, diffusers...turbine and jet engine development...

1947-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

299

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...including a review of the field by Brown, Dodd, Glaser...particle experimental field from cloud chambers is...review by Bernardini (Illinois) and there are about...protons. A section on pion production by nucleons includes...epochs of advance in the field of physics, there have...

1957-04-26T23:59:59.000Z

300

DRAFT for Secretarial Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DRAFT for Secretarial Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/RIR/IRFA) evaluates FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For an Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish of the Bering Sea

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 September 2000 Transportation Emergency Management Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a transportation emergency management review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) in September 2000.

302

Estimated cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT in children with malignancies: a 5-year retrospective review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

EE, Thomas SR et al (2002) MIRD dose estimate report No. 19:of a mathematical phantom (MIRD phantom) by a range of CTselect using a diagram of the MIRD phantom provided. Based

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

303

Agent review phase one report.  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes the findings for phase one of the agent review and discusses the review methods and results. The phase one review identified a short list of agent systems that would prove most useful in the service architecture of an information management, analysis, and retrieval system. Reviewers evaluated open-source and commercial multi-agent systems and scored them based upon viability, uniqueness, ease of development, ease of deployment, and ease of integration with other products. Based on these criteria, reviewers identified the ten most appropriate systems. The report also mentions several systems that reviewers deemed noteworthy for the ideas they implement, even if those systems are not the best choices for information management purposes.

Zubelewicz, Alex Tadeusz; Davis, Christopher Edward; Bauer, Travis LaDell

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

A retrospective analysis of the two-generation study: What is the added value of the second generation?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Increasing pressure is exerted by some stakeholders to reduce the two-generation study to a one-generation study, a measure that would considerably reduce the number of animals and other costs involved in these lengthy studies. The present study retrospectively evaluates 176 multi-generation studies to assess potential differences between the first and the second generation, both in terms of the types of effects observed and in terms of the effective doses. All substances classified as reproductive toxicants by the Directive 92/32/EEC or considered as toxic to fertility by the California EPA for which we found a multi-generation study were included (n = 58 studies). The second generation in the two-generation studies considered affected neither the overall NOAEL nor the critical effect. Therefore, it had no impact on the ensuing risk assessment, nor on classification and labeling. However, several substances did show an increased sensitivity of the F1 adults in comparison to the P0. These results support the proposal of replacing the current two-generation study by a one-generation study with a more extensive assessment of parameters at F1 adulthood.

Gemma Janer; Betty C. Hakkert; Wout Slob; Theo Vermeire; Aldert H. Piersma

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...papers on bubble chambers, including a review of the field...discussions of experimental work at the University...fact that bubble chambers are far from...1957, 162 Combustion Processes, vol...1957, 556 Experimental Stress Analysis...

1957-04-26T23:59:59.000Z

306

Book reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Ulf Lagerkvist, Pioneers of microbiology and the Nobel Prize. C. Djerassi...Dadswell, The Selborne pioneer. Gilbert White as naturalist and scientist...Reviews This book situates medical microbiology in its historical context. The...

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

PATENT REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Reviews Multiple-Column Gas Chromatographic Apparatus...UNATTENDED OPERATION LOW COST LONG LIFE MULTIPLE COLUMN GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC APPARATUS...ready forcontinuous production of ultra-pure helium...being used extensively in gas chromatography, transistor......

Multiple-Column Gas Chromatographic Apparatus Larry R. Durrett; Milburn J. O'Neal; Jr. (to Shell Oil Co.; New York; N.Y.) U.S. Pat. 3,236,603 (Feb. 22; 1966)

1966-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Assessment of retrospective dose estimation, with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), of six victims previously exposed to accidental ionizing radiation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The present study aims to evaluate the use of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) translocation assay for retrospective dose estimation of acute accidental exposure to radiation in the past. Reciprocal translocation analysis by FISH with three whole-chromosome probes was performed on normal peripheral blood samples. Samples were irradiated with 0–5 Gy 60Co ?-rays in vitro, and dose–effect curves were established. FISH-based translocation analyses for six accident victims were then performed, and biological doses were estimated retrospectively by comparison with the dose–effect curves. Reconstructed doses by FISH were compared with estimated doses obtained by analysis of di-centrics performed soon after exposure, or with dose estimates from tooth-enamel electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) data obtained at the same time as the FISH analysis. Follow-up FISH analyses for an adolescent victim were performed. Results showed that dose–effect curves established in the present study follow a linear-quadratic model, regardless of the background translocation frequency. Estimated doses according to two dose–effect curves for all six victims were similar. FISH dose estimations of three adult victims exposed to accidental radiation less than a decade prior to analysis (3, 6, or 7 years ago) were consistent with those estimated with tooth-enamel EPR measurements or analyses of di-centrics. Estimated doses of two other adult victims exposed to radiation over a decade prior to analysis (16 or 33 years ago) were underestimated and two to three times lower than the values obtained from analysis of di-centrics or tooth-enamel EPR. Follow-up analyses of the adolescent victim showed that doses estimated by FISH analysis decrease rapidly over time. Therefore, the accuracy of dose estimates by FISH is acceptable only when analysis is performed less than 7 years after exposure. Measurements carried out more than a decade after exposure through FISH analysis resulted in underestimation of the biological doses compared with values obtained through analysis of di-centrics and tooth-enamel EPR.

Qing-Jie Liu; Xue Lu; Xiao-Tao Zhao; Jiang-Bin Feng; Yu-Min Lü; En-Hai Jiang; Shu-Lan Zhang; De-Qing Chen; Ting-Zhen Jia; Li Liang

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review For Amendment 99 to the Fishery Management Plan ..................................................................................................... iii 1.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW................................................................................................................1 1.1.1 What is a Regulatory Impact Review

310

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

311

Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- Sample Evaluation and Selection Plan JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 4 Sample Noncompetitive Review Plan.docx ATTACHMENT 5 Sample Initial Compliance Review 1-16.docx ATTACHMENT 6...

312

Peer Review Summary Document Peer Review Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Peer Review Summary Document (12/11/13) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review.S. Dalyander, J.W. Long, N.G. Plant, and D.M. Thompson. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Reviewer #1 of sediment during and after storms. Peer Reviewer #1 has also conducted research into the behavior of oil

Torgersen, Christian

313

Peer Review Summary Document Peer Review Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Peer Review Summary Document (9/17/13) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review, and D.M. Thompson. Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Reviewer #1 received PhD and MS degrees storms. Peer Reviewer #1's research has been funded primarily by the Office of Naval Research, the U

Torgersen, Christian

314

Peer Review Summary Document Peer Review Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Peer Review Summary Document (1/9/2012) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review of Hawai`i Economic Research Organization). Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1 ­ Ph of terrestrial ecosystems in Hawaii and Pacific islands. Peer Reviewer #2 ­ Ph.D. in Botany, Emeritus Professor

Torgersen, Christian

315

Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes, November 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Review Oversight Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2

316

Design and Evaluation of Novel High Capacity Cathode Materials...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

High Capacity Cathodes Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Design and Evaluation of High Capacity Cathodes Design and Evaluation of Novel High Capacity Cathode Materials...

317

High Efficiency Engine Systems Development and Evaluation | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

High Efficiency Engine Systems Development and Evaluation 2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

318

ACE Merit Review Report FY2004  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Merit Review and Peer Evaluation of FY 2004 DOE Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL May 18-20, 2004 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program December 2004 Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 13, 2004 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2004 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 18-20, 2004 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were

319

Electric Drive Vehicle Demonstration and Vehicle Infrastructure Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

320

Design and Evaluation of Novel High Capacity Cathode Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Defining Real World Drive Cycles to Support APRF Technology Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

322

Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Field Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation

323

Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Field Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

324

Electric Drive Vehicle Demonstration and Vehicle Infrastructure Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

325

Design and Evaluation of Novel High Capacity Cathode Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation

326

Ablation Casting Evaluation for High Volume Structural Castings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

327

Develop & Evaluate Materials & Additives that Enhance Thermal & Overcharge Abuse  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

328

Develop & Evaluate Materials & Additives that Enhance Thermal & Overcharge Abuse  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation

329

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Nothing suggested that they were part of a project, commissioned in 1669, for what should...Gerard Kinkhuysen. The story of the project, abandoned in 1676 when almost complete...regretting his " former 670 BOOK REVIEWS serene liberty ", andfinallygave up the undertaking......

R. C. H. Tanner

1969-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Book Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......majority, living standards have plummeted and...5, 2003 526 BOOK REVIEWS discusses some basic...programming language Standard ML: CML (Concurrrent ML), Facile and PLAN (Packet Language...CML, Facile and PLAN to the reader who is familiar with Standard ML. Then (third......

Ferruccio Damiani

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...does not permit review of the remaining 12 papers. The book presents...and Transport Prop-erties of Gases, Liquids, and Solids. A symposium...Thermodynamic properties: gases and liquids"; "PVT data and...thermo-dynamic properties of gases." The sym-posium was sponsored...

1959-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

332

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...University Elementary theory of gas turbines and jet propulsion. J. G. Keenan...could be written on the theory of gas turbines and jet propulsion, but the author...introduction the early history of the gas turbine is reviewed. Various components...

1947-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

333

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......order of some of the material seems rather odd. A...work as a whole. The material is well presented and...explained with numerous diagrams to help 246 BOOK REVIEWS...examples of careless handling of the different concepts...convergence. Most of the material presented here may......

A. W. Ingleton

1970-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Algae Reviewed  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... EACH time a new textbook of the algae is published, one hopes that at last it will be possible to stop telling ... will be possible to stop telling students that Fritsch's Structure and Reproduction of the Algae is a superb review of phycological knowledge up to 1935 but that no textbook written ...

GORDON F. LEEDALE

1969-10-11T23:59:59.000Z

335

Charmonium Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

During the last few years there has been a renaissance in charm and charmonium spectroscopy with higher precision measurements at the $\\psi^{'}$ and $\\psi(3770)$ coming from BESII and CLEOc and many new discoveries coming from B-factories. In this paper, I will review the status of $\\psi(3770)$ and below.

Frederick A. Harris

2006-10-06T23:59:59.000Z

336

Book Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

for he sees hi.s reflexive aocLo.Logv as part of t ht s movement: "Reflexi.ve sociologv is and would need to be a radical s oc LoLogv , ff (489) I think Bennett Berger in a recent review of Gouldner's book is right when he says: '". . . regi...

Ritzer, George

1970-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

Technology Validation: Fuel Cell Bus Evaluations  

SciTech Connect

Presentation for the 2005 U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Program review showing status of U.S. and international fuel cell transit bus evaluations.

Eudy, L.

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Heavy-Duty Vehicle Field Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, May 18-22, 2009 -- Washington D.C.

339

2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The 2010 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting was held June 7-11, 2010 in Washington, DC. The review encompassed all of the work done...

340

2009 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting was held May 18-22, 2009 in Arlington, Virginia. The review encompassed all of the work...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management for Building 3019 This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (ORO-EM) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review involved evaluation of established IVR processes and implementation of the newly revised documented safety analysis (DSA) and technical safety

342

2007 Nuclear Data Review  

SciTech Connect

The results of a review and evaluation of neutron and non-neutron nuclear data published in the scientific literature are presented. The status of new chemical elements is examined. Data on revised values for the isotopic composition of the elements are reviewed and recommended values are presented. Half-lives of very long-lived nuclides are presented, including double beta decay, double electron capture, long-lived alpha decay and long-lived beta decay. Data from new measurements on the very heavy elements (trans-meitnerium elements) are discussed and tabulated. The first observation of the radioactive decay mode of the free neutron is discussed. New measurements that have expanded the neutron drip line for magnesium and aluminum are discussed. Data on recent neutron cross-section and resonance integral measurements are also discussed.

Holden,N.E.

2008-05-05T23:59:59.000Z

343

Does fundamental host range match ecological host range? A retrospective case study of a Lygus plant bug parasitoid  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Using the retrospective case study of Peristenus digoneutis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) introduced in the United States for biological control of native Lygus plant bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae), laboratory and field studies were conducted in the area of origin to evaluate whether the fundamental host range of P. digoneutis matches its ecological host range. Furthermore, it was determined whether these approaches would have been indicative of the post-introduction host range of P. digoneutis in North America [Day, W.H., 1999. Host preference of introduced and native parasites (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) of phytophagous plant bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae) in alfalfa-grass fields in the north-eastern USA, BioControl 44, 249–261.]. Seven non-target mirid species were selected to define the fundamental host range of P. digoneutis in the area of origin in Europe. Laboratory choice and no-choice tests demonstrated that all selected non-target species were attacked by P. digoneutis and were largely suitable for parasitoid development. To confirm the validity of the fundamental host range, the ecological host range of P. digoneutis in the area of origin was investigated. Peristenus digoneutis was reared from 10 hosts, including three Lygus species and seven non-target hosts from the subfamily Mirinae. Despite the fact that laboratory tests demonstrated a high parasitism level in non-targets, ecological assessments in both North America (Day, 1999) and Europe suggest a much lower impact of P. digoneutis on non-target mirids, with low levels of parasitism (below 1% in Europe). Therefore, ecological host range studies in the area of origin provide useful supplementary data for interpreting pre-release laboratory host range testing.

T. Haye; H. Goulet; P.G. Mason; U. Kuhlmann

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

Economics and the evaluation of publicly funded energy R and D  

SciTech Connect

There are three major areas in which economics can contribute to the evaluation of federal R and D: assessment of net benefits, ex ante expected as well as ex post realized; tailoring of R and D portfolios to policy goals; and guiding the contractual organization of R and D production. Additionally, evaluation of R and D and scientific activity tend to be distinctly retrospective, principally because of the long lags between the initial production activity and the observability of consequences. Extending the purview of economic evaluation of R and D, they find ample opportunity for evaluation that can inform current R and D management practice. The conduct of R and D is organized through a series of explicit and implicit contracts designed to elicit long-term commitments by some agents while attempting to limit the commitment by others. It is natural to consider the efficiency with which R and D is conducted as a subject for economic inquiry, although in practice such inquiries generally are restricted to accounting exercises. In evaluating the efficiency with which R and D is done, the current ordinary practice is to look at labor rates and equipment and materials prices while considering quantities of those items as the principal instrument variables in an optimization problem (the authors conceptualization, not that of the typical review of an R and D project). The authors recommend the contractual structure and other elements of the incentive structure (pay and promotion) of R and D production as prime focal points for managerially useful economic evaluation. Non-economic motivations for funding public R and D, including energy R and D, are well known. The US will consider spending several billion dollars on an international space station, partly if not largely, to fund the peaceful employment of scientists from the Former Soviet Union. Nonetheless, it will be useful to understand the economics of the R and D programs even if other considerations play important roles in funding.

Jones, D.W.; Paik, I.K.

1998-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

345

A Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review Review of BNL Direct-Wind Superconducting IR Magnet Experience 30th Advanced ICFA Beam Dynamics Workshop on High Luminosity e+e - Collisions October 13-16, 2003 Stanford, California Presented by Brett Parker for the Brookhaven Superconducting Magnet Division * Overview of Past and Current Projects. - HERA-II Luminosity Upgrade IR Magnets. - NLC Superconducting Final Focus Magnets. - BEPC-II Luminosity Upgrade IR Magnets. * Winding Technology Overview. - New Types of "Serpentine" Coil Windings. - Winding Test of BEPC-II Serpentine Coil. * Some Issues Relevant for Super B-Factory. - Cryostat & Warm Bore Allowance. - Quadrupole Coil Layout Options. - Magnetic Length Vs. Slot Length. - Dipole Torque Considerations. " A R e v i e w o f B N L D i r e c t - W i n d Superconducting IR Magnet Experience." HERA-II GO Magnet Installed in H1 BNL Winding Machine Stainless

346

DOE Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Review 2007 Review 2007 AWA Facility Update, High Gradient Wakefield Generation, and Future Upgrades Manoel Conde, Sergey Antipov, Felipe Franchini, Wei Gai, Feng Gao, Chunguang Jing, Richard Konecny, Wanming Liu, Jidong Long, John Power, Haitao Wang, Zikri Yusof Argonne Wakefield Accelerator Group High Energy Physics Division April 25 - 27, 2007 2 Outline Description of AWA Facililty. Wakefield structures built and tested. Measurements and simulations. List of next experiments to be performed. Plans for Facility upgrades. 3 AWA Drive Beamline Drive Gun Linac & Steering Coils Quads Wakefield Structure Experimental Chambers 4.5 m GV GV YAG1 YAG2 Spectrometer YAG5 Dump/ Faraday Cup Slits YAG4 YAG3 ICT1 ICT2 BPM Single bunch operation - Q=1-100 nC - Energy=15 MeV - High Current = 10 kAmp

347

Book review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This book belongs to the series 'Perspectives in Nanotechnology' of CRC Press. It is a scientific encyclopedic monograph and, at the same time, a practical guide on two overlapping, closely related, very promising, recently emerging and rapidly developing areas of science and technology: medical nanotechnology consisting of a variety of nanoscale technologies applied to medicine and biomedical engineering, and nanomedicine being a newly emerging area of medicine which was created on the basis of the achievements of the research of molecular processes at the cellular level. The book consists of three parts. Part I with the title 'Perspectives' has three short chapters. In chapter 1 the author presents the scientific basis of medical nanotechnology and nanomedicine and discusses their societal implications. The main content of chapter 2 is the brief history of nanomedicine and the milestones of medical nanotechnology. The research initiatives, important publications, organizations, scientific meetings on medical nanotechnology and nanomedicine are listed in chapter 3. Part II with the title 'Beginning of Medical Nanotechnology' can be considered as a comprehensive presentation of the status quo of the successfully performed applications of nanotechnology in medicine and biomedical engineering. It consists of six chapters. In chapter 4 the author presents the impacts of nanotechnology on medicine, the natural evolution from physics, chemistry and bioscience to nanomedicine and the architecture of medical nanotechnology and nanomedicine. The other five chapters of part II are five encyclopedic bibliographical reviews on the advances in five main topics of medical nanotechnology and nanomedicine. In chapter 5 'Medication: Nanoparticles for Imaging and Drug Delivery', after introducing general requirements for the use of nanoparticles, the author presents a review on nanoparticles for x-ray and tomography imaging as well as for the enhancement of magnetic resonance imaging, nanodots for quantum resonance effects, nanoparticles for enhancing IR, visible, UV, ultrasound and optoacoustic imaging, for targeted imaging and energy delivery, such as photothermal and photodynamic therapy. A major part of this chapter is a review on nanoparticles for drug delivery either by direct application of nanoparticles in therapy or by targeted drug delivery. Different examples of cellular nanomachinery targeted by nanodrug are presented. The materials for fabricating drug delivery nanosystems are reviewed: nanocrystal, albumin-based particles, colloids, emulsions, gels, nanodiamonds, fibers, nanotubes, dendrimer, polymer-based particles, polymer-conjugates, polymeric micelles, liposomes, nanocapsules, etc. The therapeutic applications of nanoparticles are also presented with the attention on cancer therapy. The content of chapter 6 'Intervention: Nanotechnology in Reconstructive Intervention and Surgery' is the presentation on the nanoengineered materials in surgical and restorative applications, the use of endoscopic microelectromechanical systems (MEMs) for bridging the gap between drugs and surgery, and robotic technology in surgery. Chapter 7 'Regeneration: Nanomaterials for Tissue Regeneration' is a review on the application of nanotechnology in tissue regeneration. After presenting on the biomaterials for tissue regeneration, the author reviews the application of nanotechnology in tissue engineering, bioactive scaffold-guided tissue regeneration, cellular signaling, cell transplants, stem cell-based therapies and tissue engineering, and nanoencapsulation of cells and tissues. The following topics are then reviewed: nanomaterials for nerve regeneration by means of tissue engineering, nanoengineered materials for brain regeneration, nanoengineered scaffolding with cells for central nervous system regeneration, and new developments in cell therapy accelerated by nanoscience and nanotechnology. Chapter 8 with the title 'Restoration: Nanotechnology in Tissue Replacements and Prosthetics' is a review on the materials which have been used for im

Nguyen Van Hieu

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

Book Reviews  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

meanings" que cumplan una función de resistencia semiótica a los valores hegemónicos. Los estudios que 182 LATIN AMERICAN THEATRE REVIEW se hagan según estos lincamientos prometen validar, refinar y particularizar los planteamientos adelantados por esta... los materiales de los congresos como las investigaciones sobre teatro llevadas a cabo en Argentina. En conjunto, bajo la dirección de Osvaldo Pellettieri, el GETEA lleva a cabo uno de los proyectos colectivos de investigación del teatro...

Editors

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

Retrospection of Chernobyl nuclear accident for decision analysis concerning remedial actions in Ukraine  

SciTech Connect

It is considered the efficacy of decisions concerning remedial actions when of-site radiological monitoring in the early and (or) in the intermediate phases was absent or was not informative. There are examples of such situations in the former Soviet Union where many people have been exposed: releases of radioactive materials from 'Krasnoyarsk-26' into Enisey River, releases of radioactive materials from 'Chelabinsk-65' (the Kishtim accident), nuclear tests at the Semipalatinsk Test Site, the Chernobyl nuclear accident etc. If monitoring in the early and (or) in the intermediate phases is absent the decisions concerning remedial actions are usually developed on the base of permanent monitoring. However decisions of this kind may be essentially erroneous. For these cases it is proposed to make retrospection of radiological data of the early and intermediate phases of nuclear accident and to project decisions concerning remedial actions on the base of both retrospective data and permanent monitoring data. In this Report the indicated problem is considered by the example of the Chernobyl accident for Ukraine. Their of-site radiological monitoring in the early and intermediate phases was unsatisfactory. In particular, the pasture-cow-milk monitoring had not been made. All official decisions concerning dose estimations had been made on the base of measurements of {sup 137}Cs in body (40 measurements in 135 days and 55 measurements in 229 days after the Chernobyl accident). For the retrospection of radiological data of the Chernobyl accident dynamic model has been developed. This model has structure similar to the structure of Pathway model and Farmland model. Parameters of the developed model have been identified for agricultural conditions of Russia and Ukraine. By means of this model dynamics of 20 radionuclides in pathways and dynamics of doses have been estimated for the early, intermediate and late phases of the Chernobyl accident. The main results are following: - During the first year after the Chernobyl accident 75-93% of Commitment Effective Dose had been formed; - During the first year after the Chernobyl accident 85-90% of damage from radiation exposure had been formed. During the next 50 years (the late phase of accident) only 10-15% of damage from radiation exposure will have been formed; - Remedial actions (agricultural remedial actions as most effective) in Ukraine are intended for reduction of the damage from consumption of production which is contaminated in the late phase of accident. I.e. agricultural remedial actions have been intended for minimization only 10 % of the total damage from radiation exposure; - Medical countermeasures can minimize radiation exposure damage by an order of magnitude greater than agricultural countermeasures. - Thus, retrospection of nuclear accident has essentially changed type of remedial actions and has given a chance to increase effectiveness of spending by an order of magnitude. This example illustrates that in order to optimize remedial actions it is required to use data of retrospection of nuclear accidents in all cases when monitoring in the early and (or) intermediate phases is unsatisfactory. (author)

Georgievskiy, Vladimir [Russian Research Center 'Kurchatov Insitute', Kurchatov Sq., 1, 123182 Moscow (Russian Federation)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

For each major emission source identified in the previous step to evaluate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission profile, Federal agencies should review possible strategies for reducing GHG emissions and determine what assets may benefit from each strategy.

351

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW /  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Regulatory Impact Review For a proposed Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska to Remove

352

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review for Proposed Amendment 102 to the Fishery....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Regulatory Impact Review Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Establishing a Community Quota Entity

353

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office (LFO) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 200 preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and

354

Peer review under review: room for improvement?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The peer review process is a central part of medicine ... Although generally considered essential to academic quality, peer review has been increasingly criticised as ineffective, slow...

E. E. van der Wall

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation- September 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Transportation Emergency Management Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP)

356

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Abuse Tolerance Improvements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Sandia National Laboratories at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about abuse tolerance...

357

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Dry Process Electrode Fabrication  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Navitas Systems at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about dry process electrode...

358

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Battery Thermal Characterization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by NREL at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about battery thermal characterization.

359

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Battery Safety Testing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Sandia National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about battery safety...

360

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Advanced Combustion and Fuels  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by NREL at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about advanced combustion and fuels.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Development of...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Presentation given by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

362

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Biochemical Conversion...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Biochemical Conversion 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Biochemical Conversion This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent...

363

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Infrastructure | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Infrastructure 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Infrastructure This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of...

364

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Sustainability | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sustainability 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Sustainability "This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of...

365

2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Feedstock | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Feedstock 2011 Biomass Program Platform Peer Review: Feedstock This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of experts at...

366

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Consumer Vehicle Technology Data  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by National Renewable Energy Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about consumer...

367

Review of A123s HEV and PHEV USABC Programs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, May 18-22, 2009 -- Washington D.C.

368

2010 Joint Effectiveness Review of Hanford Bldg 336 Corrective...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

assessment included evaluation of work control, fall protection, quality assurance, and conduct of operations. Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) were generated for...

369

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Novel Anode Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Argonne National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about novel anode...

370

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Refuel Colorado  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Colorado Energy Office at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about Refuel Colorado.

371

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Reliability of Electrical Interconnects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by National Renewable Energy Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about...

372

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Power Electronics Packaging  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about Power...

373

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Characterization of Catalysts Microstructures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about...

374

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: DOE's Effort to...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Presentation given by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

375

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Multi-Material...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Lightweight Vehicles Presentation given by VEHMA at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

376

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Benchmarking EV...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Presentation given by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

377

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Vehicle & Systems...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

& Testing Presentation given by U.S. Department of Energy at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

378

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Development and...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Class 8 Highway Vehicle Presentation given by Volvo Trucks at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

379

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Zero-Emission...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

given by South Coast Air Quality Management District at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

380

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: High Speed Joining...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Presentation given by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Next Generation Inverter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by General Motors at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about next generation inverter.

382

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Engine Friction Reduction Technologies  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Argonne National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about engine friction...

383

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Electrochemical Performance Testing  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Argonne National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about electrochemical...

384

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: PEV Integration with Renewables  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by National Renewable Energy Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about PEV...

385

2013 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees 2013 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees Merit review of DOE Vehicle Technologies research...

386

Detecting Crowdsourced Spam Reviews in Social Media  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

User submitted reviews are used by potential buyers to evaluate products before their purchase. In this work we study cases of deceptive reviews on Amazon.com which rate the products favorably. These were paid for through a number of crowd- sourcing...

Fayazi, Amir A

2013-11-25T23:59:59.000Z

387

Review of Particle Properties Particle Data Group  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This review of the properties of leptons, mesons, and baryons is an updating of Review of Particle Properties, Particle Data Group (Phys. Letters 39B, No. 1 (1972)). Data are evaluated, listed, averaged, and summarized in tables. A data booklet is also available.

THOMAS A. LASINSKI; ANGELA BARBARO-GALTIERI; ROBERT L. KELLY; ALAN RITTENBERG; ARTHUR H. ROSENFELD; THOMAS G. TRIPPE; NAOMI BARASH-SCHMIDT; CLAUDE BRICMAN; VLADIMIR CHALOUPKA; PAUL SÖDING; MATTS ROOS

1973-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

Energy-efficient buildings program evaluations. Volume 2: Evaluation summaries  

SciTech Connect

This document presents summaries of code and utility building program evaluations reviewed as the basis for the information presented in Energy-Efficient Buildings Program Evaluations, Volume 1: Findings and Recommendations, DOE/EE/OBT-11569, Vol. 1. The main purpose of this volume is to summarize information from prior evaluations of similar programs that may be useful background for designing and conducting an evaluation of the BSGP. Another purpose is to summarize an extensive set of relevant evaluations and provide a resource for program designers, mangers, and evaluators.

Lee, A.D.; Mayi, D.; Edgemon, S.D.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Potential of Hybrid Computational Phantoms for Retrospective Heart Dosimetry After Breast Radiation Therapy: A Feasibility Study  

SciTech Connect

Purpose: Current retrospective cardiovascular dosimetry studies are based on a representative patient or simple mathematic phantoms. Here, a process of patient modeling was developed to personalize the anatomy of the thorax and to include a heart model with coronary arteries. Methods and Materials: The patient models were hybrid computational phantoms (HCPs) with an inserted detailed heart model. A computed tomography (CT) acquisition (pseudo-CT) was derived from HCP and imported into a treatment planning system where treatment conditions were reproduced. Six current patients were selected: 3 were modeled from their CT images (A patients) and the others were modelled from 2 orthogonal radiographs (B patients). The method performance and limitation were investigated by quantitative comparison between the initial CT and the pseudo-CT, namely, the morphology and the dose calculation were compared. For the B patients, a comparison with 2 kinds of representative patients was also conducted. Finally, dose assessment was focused on the whole coronary artery tree and the left anterior descending coronary. Results: When 3-dimensional anatomic information was available, the dose calculations performed on the initial CT and the pseudo-CT were in good agreement. For the B patients, comparison of doses derived from HCP and representative patients showed that the HCP doses were either better or equivalent. In the left breast radiation therapy context and for the studied cases, coronary mean doses were at least 5-fold higher than heart mean doses. Conclusions: For retrospective dose studies, it is suggested that HCP offers a better surrogate, in terms of dose accuracy, than representative patients. The use of a detailed heart model eliminates the problem of identifying the coronaries on the patient's CT.

Moignier, Alexandra, E-mail: alexandra.moignier@irsn.fr [Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses (France)] [Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses (France); Derreumaux, Sylvie; Broggio, David; Beurrier, Julien [Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses (France)] [Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses (France); Chea, Michel; Boisserie, Gilbert [Groupe Hospitalier Pitie Salpetriere, Service de Radiotherapie, Paris (France)] [Groupe Hospitalier Pitie Salpetriere, Service de Radiotherapie, Paris (France); Franck, Didier; Aubert, Bernard [Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses (France)] [Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses (France); Mazeron, Jean-Jacques [Groupe Hospitalier Pitie Salpetriere, Service de Radiotherapie, Paris (France)] [Groupe Hospitalier Pitie Salpetriere, Service de Radiotherapie, Paris (France)

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Assessor Training Evaluating OnSite Reports  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

NVLAP Assessor Training Evaluating OnSite Reports and Corrective Actions #12;Assessor Training 2009Site Report form ·NVLAP OnSite Assessment Review form #12;Assessor Training 2009: Evaluating OnSite Reports · Nonconformities cited #12;Assessor Training 2009: Evaluating OnSite Reports & Corrective Actions 44 Evaluating

391

Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Specification"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Specification" Date: November 6, 2000 for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy Reviewed: Technical Evaluation Report Approved: "DCE BOOT/OPERATE Interface Center for Astrophysics & Space Astronomy Revision A Technical Evaluation Report "DCE BOOT

Colorado at Boulder, University of

392

Monthly Energy Review - January 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1) 1) January 2008 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

393

Monthly Energy Review - September 2007  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

09) 09) September 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

394

Monthly Energy Review - February 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2) 2) February 2008 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

395

Monthly Energy Review - October 2007  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0) 0) October 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

396

Monthly Energy Review - November 2007  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1) 1) November 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

397

Packaging Review Guide for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packagings  

SciTech Connect

This Packaging Review Guide (PRG) provides guidance for Department of Energy (DOE) review and approval of packagings to transport fissile and Type B quantities of radioactive material. It fulfills, in part, the requirements of DOE Order 460.1B for the Headquarters Certifying Official to establish standards and to provide guidance for the preparation of Safety Analysis Reports for Packagings (SARPs). This PRG is intended for use by the Headquarters Certifying Official and his or her review staff, DOE Secretarial offices, operations/field offices, and applicants for DOE packaging approval. This PRG is generally organized at the section level in a format similar to that recommended in Regulatory Guide 7.9 (RG 7.9). One notable exception is the addition of Section 9 (Quality Assurance), which is not included as a separate chapter in RG 7.9. Within each section, this PRG addresses the technical and regulatory bases for the review, the manner in which the review is accomplished, and findings that are generally applicable for a package that meets the approval standards. This Packaging Review Guide (PRG) provides guidance for DOE review and approval of packagings to transport fissile and Type B quantities of radioactive material. It fulfills, in part, the requirements of DOE O 460.1B for the Headquarters Certifying Official to establish standards and to provide guidance for the preparation of Safety Analysis Reports for Packagings (SARPs). This PRG is intended for use by the Headquarters Certifying Official and his review staff, DOE Secretarial offices, operations/field offices, and applicants for DOE packaging approval. The primary objectives of this PRG are to: (1) Summarize the regulatory requirements for package approval; (2) Describe the technical review procedures by which DOE determines that these requirements have been satisfied; (3) Establish and maintain the quality and uniformity of reviews; (4) Define the base from which to evaluate proposed changes in scope and requirements of reviews; and (5) Provide the above information to DOE organizations, contractors, other government agencies, and interested members of the general public. This PRG was originally published in September 1987. Revision 1, issued in October 1988, added new review sections on quality assurance and penetrations through the containment boundary, along with a few other items. Revision 2 was published October 1999. Revision 3 of this PRG is a complete update, and supersedes Revision 2 in its entirety.

DiSabatino, A; Biswas, D; DeMicco, M; Fisher, L E; Hafner, R; Haslam, J; Mok, G; Patel, C; Russell, E

2007-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

398

External Technical Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » Waste Management » Tank Waste and Waste Processing » External Technical Reviews External Technical Reviews Documents Available for Download September 1, 2011 Peer Review of the ASCEM Program 2010 Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download September 1, 2011 Compilation of ETR Summaries ETR Summaries from 2011 February 15, 2011 External Technical Review Report for Small Column Ion Exchange Technology at Savannah River Site Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download September 30, 2009 External Technical Review for Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of Hanford Site Liquid Waste Process Full Document and Summary Versions are available for download June 30, 2009 Evaluation of System Level Modeling and Simulation Tools in Support of

399

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Independent Scientific Review Panel for the Northwest Power Planning Council 851 SW 6 th Avenue Planning Council Members FROM: Rick Williams, ISRP Chair RE: ISRP Review of the Draft Monitoring revision of the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) component of the plan. From the review of the document

400

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: SuperTruck Program: Engine Project Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation given by Detroit Diesel Corporation at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about SuperTruck Program...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - December 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2012 December 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - December 2012 December 2012 Review of the Hanford Tank Farms Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation This report documents an independent review by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) of radiological protection program (RPP) activity-level implementation at the Hanford Tank Farms. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review effort is to evaluate the flowdown of occupational radiation protection requirements, as expressed in facility RPPs, to work planning, control, and execution processes, such as

402

Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes May 2011 January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

403

Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of the Independent Oversight Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Implementation Verification Review Processes May 2011 January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope..................................................................................................................................................... 2

404

Review of the Y-1-12 Implementation Verification Review Processes, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 Implementation Verification Review Y-12 Implementation Verification Review Processes May 2011 June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

405

Review of the Y-1-12 Implementation Verification Review Processes, June 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Y-12 Implementation Verification Review Y-12 Implementation Verification Review Processes May 2011 June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

406

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Lawrence Livermore National Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 December 2009 Review of Nuclear Safety at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Evaluations. LLNL has made significant progress in establishing and implementing comprehensive programs to effectively manage nuclear safety. LLNL has devoted considerable management attention and resources to enhance nuclear

407

Independent Oversight Focused Program Review, Argonne National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Focused Program Review, Argonne National Focused Program Review, Argonne National Laboratory-West - May 2001 Independent Oversight Focused Program Review, Argonne National Laboratory-West - May 2001 May 2001 Focused Program Review at Argonne National Laboratory-West The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a focused review of the emergency management program at Argonne National Laboratory-West (ANL-W) in May 2001. There were two primary objectives for this review: to evaluate the extent to which the emergency planning hazards assessment (EPHA) document serves as an effective foundation for the ANL-W emergency management program, and to determine whether the necessary interfaces have been established among

408

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 August 2008 Review of Construction Safety and Health Programs This special review of construction safety was performed by the Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), to provide feedback to DOE line management and contractors on the effectiveness of line organizations at DOE sites in implementing construction safety requirements. This special review is based on data collected over the past three years (covering the timeframe from late 2005 to early 2008) during scheduled inspections performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations, at the

409

PETC Review  

SciTech Connect

This issue of the PETC Review is devoted to explaining how the private sector can do business with DOE-and with PETC in particular-and how DOE works with academia, industry, and state and local groups to accomplish objectives of mutual interest. Over the past several years, the notion of cost-sharing'' has been receiving increased attention. Indeed, cost-shared RD D is becoming the norm, not only within DOE but also among other government agencies, including the Department of Defense. It may surprise some of our readership to learn that RD D cost-sharing is not a new government policy. In fact, it has been part of the DOE Acquisition Regulations from their inception in 1977. In lay terms, cost participation, a general kind of cost-sharing, is required for RD D efforts in which the non-Federal participant's goal is commercialization or in situations for which it is reasonable to expect that economic benefits will accrue to the participant as a result of the work. The policy is quite flexible and states that the degree of non-DOEcost participation depends on a number of factors, including the nature of the work performed and the extent of the project risk. As competition for RD D funds increases, it is to be expected that cost-sharing requirements for development, and even for basic research, will increase. Nevertheless, we think that Federal support of RD D will continue to be necessary to maintain this country's leadership in science, technology, industry, and living standards.

Santore, R.R.; Blaustein, B.D.; Friedman, S.; Reiss, J.; Brown, J.; Price, M.M. (eds.) [eds.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

410

Review of soil contamination guidance  

SciTech Connect

A review of existing and proposed radioactive soil contamination standards and guidance was conducted for United Nuclear Corporation (UNC), Office of Surplus Facilities Management. Information was obtained from both government agencies and other sources during a literature survey. The more applicable standards were reviewed, evaluated, and summarized. Information pertaining to soil contamination for both facility operation and facility decommissioning was obtained from a variety of sources. These sources included: the Code of Federal Regulations, regulatory guides, the Federal Register, topical reports written by various government agencies, topical reports written by national laboratories, and publications from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). It was difficult to directly compare the standards and guidance obtained from these sources since each was intended for a specific situation and different units or bases were used. However, most of the information reviewed was consistent with the philosophy of maintaining exposures at levels as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).

Mueller, M.A.; Kennedy, W.E. Jr.; Soldat, J.K.

1981-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Merit Review Attendees 2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees Merit review of DOE Vehicle Technologies research activities 2014amr13.pdf More Documents...

412

Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Plant - February 2012 Plant - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Pantex Plant Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Pantex Plant conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from January 17 to 24, 2012. The overall purpose of these Independent Oversight reviews is to evaluate the processes and methods used for verifying and re-verifying implementation of new or substantially revised safety basis hazard controls. Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012

413

Research Review Psychology 2011  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Research Review Psychology 2011 QANU July 2012 #12;QANU / Psychology research assessment 20122;QANU / Psychology Research assessment 2012 3 CONTENTS 1. The Review Committee and review procedures...............................................166 Appendix D: Additional information regarding the Leiden Institute of Psychology ..............169

van Rooij, Robert

414

Review: Intranet Security  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Review Review: Intranet Security Reviewed by John Williamson Intranet Security John Vacca...Advanced Computer Technology and the Law Curtis...that in advanced technology the legal system...Wolverhampton University Intranet Security ?? Intranet......

John Williamson

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Review: The Weblog Handbook  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Review Review: The Weblog Handbook Reviewed by Katie Walsh The Weblog Handbook Rebecca Blood Perseus Publishing...the book. In fairness it does improve after the fifth chapter...Wireless Internet Handbook Borko Furht, Mohammad Ilyas......

Katie Walsh

2004-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Review: Data Modeling Handbook  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Review Review: Data Modeling Handbook Reviewed by Mike Jackson Reader...Wolverhampton Data Modeling Handbook Michael C. Reingruber and...England, Bristol Data Modeling Handbook Michael C. Reingruber and...a programming language. It does not contain much detail about......

Mike Jackson

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

Annual Energy Review 1999  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9 9 The Annual Energy Review (AER) presents the Energy Information Admin- istration's historical energy statistics. For many series, statistics are given for every year from 1949 through 1999. The statistics, expressed in either physical units or British thermal units, cover all major energy activities, in- cluding consumption, production, trade, stocks, and prices, for all major energy commodities, including fossil fuels, electricity, and renewable en- ergy sources. Publication of this report is in keeping with responsibilities given to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2) that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a cen- tral, comprehensive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evaluate, assemble,

418

Annual Energy Review 1998  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8 8 The Annual Energy Review (AER) presents the Energy Information Admin- istration's historical energy statistics. For many series, statistics are given for every year from 1949 through 1998. The statistics, expressed in either physical units or British thermal units, cover all major energy activities, in- cluding consumption, production, trade, stocks, and prices, for all major energy commodities, including fossil fuels, electricity, and renewable en- ergy sources. Publication of this report is in keeping with responsibilities given to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2) that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehensive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evaluate, assemble,

419

Quantum cosmology: a review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In quantum cosmology, one applies quantum physics to the whole universe. While no unique version and no completely well-defined theory is available yet, the framework gives rise to interesting conceptual, mathematical and physical questions. This review presents quantum cosmology in a new picture that tries to incorporate the importance of inhomogeneity: De-emphasizing the traditional minisuperspace view, the dynamics is rather formulated in terms of the interplay of many interacting "microscopic" degrees of freedom that describe the space-time geometry. There is thus a close relationship with more-established systems in condensed-matter and particle physics even while the large set of space-time symmetries (general covariance) requires some adaptations and new developments. These extensions of standard methods are needed both at the fundamental level and at the stage of evaluating the theory by effective descriptions.

Bojowald, Martin

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

Secretarial Review Draft REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review Draft REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW and FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For a proposed Regulatory Amendment to Implement Amendment 78 to the Fishery Management Plan for Gulf of Alaska Groundfish June 2009 #12;Post-delivery Transfers ­ Secretarial review draft June 2009 Central Gulf of Alaska

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Book Review Review of German, Lin, Parson  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of magmatic, tec- tonic, and hydrothermal processes. These are more than review papers, althoughBook Review Review of German, Lin, Parson (eds), `Mid-Ocean Ridges: Hydrothermal Interactions of Hydrothermal Cir- culation.' AGU Geophysical Mono- graph 148 is a series of papers prepared for and inspired

Fisher, Andrew

422

Chapter 8 Performance Evaluations 8.01 Performance Evaluations for Classified Employees  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, plan future job changes, and identify employee development objectives. Appendix 8-A shows the standard employment with the UW-Madison, performance on the job will be reviewed and evaluated on a regular basis for each employee. Ideally the performance review and evaluation is a summary of the overall performance

Sheridan, Jennifer

423

NGNP PHASE I REVIEW  

Energy Savers (EERE)

and start up operations of the prototype nuclear reactor and its associated hydrogen or electricity production facilities. Scope of Work for Review * Review Phase I reports in...

424

HUD's Environmental Review Training  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

An environmental review is the process of reviewing a project and its potential environmental impacts to determine whether it meets  federal, state, and local environmental standards. The...

425

ORISE: Peer Review Management  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Management Man participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) ensures that scientific reviews are conducted in a professional manner and...

426

Review: Hijacking Sustainability  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

addressing the attack on sustainability, Sharon Beder’s 2002Review: Hijacking Sustainability By Adrian Parr Reviewed byParr, Adrian. Hijacking Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT

Antonelli, Monika

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Peer Reviews Peer Reviews February 20, 2014 Investigation Peer Review 2012 Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Outcomes of the Office of Inspector General...

428

ORISE: Peer Review Expert Identification  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Expert Identification Two peer review experts discussing the review topic Effective peer review management requires finding academic reviewers or other experts and recruiting them...

429

Policy Flash 2013-21 Change to Procurement Evaluation & Re-Engineering...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Change to Procurement Evaluation & Re-Engineering Team (PERT) Review Cycle Policy Flash 2013-21 Change to Procurement Evaluation & Re-Engineering Team (PERT) Review Cycle Policy...

430

The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A systematic review to identify evaluation studies of appraisals or assessments of plans where health issues were considered from 1987...

Selena Gray; Laurence Carmichael; Hugh Barton; Julie Mytton…

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

431

Develop and Evaluate Materials and Additives that Enhance Thermal and Overcharge Abuse  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

432

CoolCab Test and Evaluation and CoolCalc HVAC Tool Development  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

433

Evaluation and Adaptation of 5-Cycle Fuel Economy Testing and Calculations for HEVs and PHEVs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

434

Development and Update of Models for Long-Term Energy and GHG Impact Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

435

Plug-In Hybrid Electric Medium Duty Commercial Fleet Demonstration and Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation

436

SCAQMD:Plug-In Hybrid Electric Medium-Duty Commercial Fleet Demonstration and Evaluation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

437

Evaluation of Ethanol Blends for PHEVs using Simulation and Engine-in-the-Loop  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2011 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation

438

CoolCab Test and Evaluation and CoolCalc HVAC Tool Development  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

439

Impact of Surface Coatings on LMR-NMC Materials: Evaluation and Downselect  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

440

A critical review of methods used in the estimation of natural gas reserves: Natural gas reserves in the state of Texas. Some educational prerequisites in the field of petroleum economics and evaluation.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-Associated Gas Reserves Volumetr ic Method Discussion of the Factors in tne Volumetri. Formula The Decline Curve Method 7 7 12 Ie Methods of Estimating Associated Gas Reserves Methods of Estimatmg Dissolved Gas Reserves Water Drive Constant Voluxne... Bibliography 58 TABLE of ILLUSTRATIONS ~Pa e A CRITICAI REVIEW OF METHODS USED IN THE ESTIMATION OF NATURAL GAS RESERVES Curves Curve No Curves Showing Change in the Compressi- bility Factor with Depth and Composition of the Wet Gas. Z4-A Curve No...

Crichton, John Alston

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

CROSSFLOW FILTRATON: LITERATURE REVIEW  

SciTech Connect

As part of the Filtration task EM-31, WP-2.3.6, which is a joint effort between Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), tests were planned to evaluate crossflow filtration in order to the improve the use of existing hardware in the waste treatment plants at both the Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) and Hanford Site. These tests included experiments to try different operating conditions and additives, such as filter aids, in order to create a more permeable filter cake and improve the permeate flux. To plan the SRNL tests a literature review was performed to provide information on previous experiments performed by DOE laboratories, and by academia. This report compliments PNNL report (Daniel, et al 2010), and is an attempt to try and capture crossflow filtration work performed in the past that provide a basis for future testing. However, not all sources on crossflow filtration could be reviewed due to the shear volume of information available. In this report various references were examined and a representative group was chosen to present the major factors that affect crossflow filtration. The information summarized in this review contains previous operating conditions studied and their influence on the rate of filtration. Besides operating conditions, other attempted improvements include the use of filter aids, a pre-filtration leaching process, the backpulse system, and various types of filter tubes and filter coatings. The results from past research can be used as a starting point for further experimentation that can result in the improvement in the performance of the crossflow filtration. The literature reviewed in this report indicates how complex the crossflow issues are with the results of some studies appearing to conflict results from other studies. This complexity implies that filtration of mobilized stored waste cannot be explained in a simple generic sense; meaning an empirical model develop from one waste-filter combination will more than likely not be applicable to another combination. It appears that filtration performance varies as wide as the range of the types of slurry wastes that exist. However, conclusions can be elicited from existing information so that filter performance can be better understood, and hopefully improved. Those conclusions and recommendations for the planned tests are listed.

Duignan, M.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2008 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen Program George Thomas, Sandia National Laboratory, retired This award recognizes George Thomas' past and continued technical excellence and outstanding dedication to the DOE Hydrogen Program in support of the President's Advanced Energy Initiative and the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative. Thomas' contributions to the Hydrogen Storage activity have

443

Radiology Services Costs and Utilization Patterns Estimates in Southeastern Europe—A Retrospective Analysis from Serbia  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

AbstractObjective Assessment of costs matrix and patterns of prescribing of radiology diagnostic, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, and interventional radiology services. Another aim of the study was insight into drivers of inappropriate resource allocation. Methods An in-depth, retrospective bottom-up trend analysis of services consumption patterns and expenses was conducted from the perspective of third-party payer, for 205,576 inpatients of a large tertiary care university hospital in Serbia (1,293 beds) from 2007 to 2010. Results A total of 20,117 patients in 2007, 17,436 in 2008, 19,996 in 2009, and 17,579 in 2010 were radiologically examined, who consumed services valued at €2,713,573.99 in 2007, €4,529,387.36 in 2008, €5,388,585.15 in –2009, and €5,556,341.35 in 2010. Conclusions The macroeconomic crisis worldwide and consecutive health policy measures caused a drop in health care services diversity offered in some areas in the period 2008 to 2009. In spite of this, in total it increased during the time span observed. The total cost of services increased because of a rise in overall consumption and population morbidity. An average radiologically examined patient got one frontal chest graph, each 7th patient got an abdomen ultrasound examination, each 19th patient got a computed tomography endocranium check, and each 25th patient got a head nuclear magnetic resonance. Findings confirm irrational prescribing of diagnostic procedures and necessities of cutting costs. The consumption patterns noticed should provide an important momentum for policymakers to intervene and ensure higher adherence to guidelines by clinicians.

Mihajlo Jakovljevi?; Ana Rankovi?; Nemanja Ran?i?; Mirjana Jovanovi?; Miloš Ivanovi?; Olgica Gajovi?; Zorica Lazi?

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

Environmental Standard Review Plan for the review of license renewal applications for nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Standard Review Plan for the Review of License Applications for Nuclear Power Plants (ESRP-LR) is to be used by the NRC staff when performing environmental reviews of applications for the renewal of power reactor licenses. The use of the ESRP-LR provides a framework for the staff to determine whether or not environmental issues important to license renewal have been identified and the impacts evaluated and provides acceptance standards to help the reviewers comply with the National Environmental Policy Act.

O'Brien, J.; Kim, T.J.; Reynolds, S.

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - November 2013 November 5, 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the preparedness of the DOE Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office, contractors at the DOE Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, and selected non-leased facilities to respond to a severe natural phenomena event (NPE). The review was conducted in July and August 2013 by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this

446

Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 May 2013 Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities This report summarizes and analyzes the results of independent reviews of IVR and associated processes at eight DOE sites conducted by Independent Oversight from August 2011 to September 2012. The purpose of the Independent Oversight review was to evaluate the processes and methods used for verifying the implementation of safety basis hazard controls and periodically re-verifying that the controls remain in place. Independent Oversight Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - May 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation

447

Full Reviews: Reservoir Characterization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Below are the project presentations and respective peer reviewer comments for Reservoir Characterization.

448

CRAD, Implementation Verification Review - July 20, 2011 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementation Verification Review - July 20, 2011 Implementation Verification Review - July 20, 2011 CRAD, Implementation Verification Review - July 20, 2011 July 20, 2011 Implementation Verification Review of Safety Basis Hazard Controls (HSS CRAD 45-39, Rev. 1) The Implementation Verification Review (IVR) inspection will evaluate the effectiveness of processes for independently verifying and re-verifying implementation of the safety basis hazard controls at the site's nuclear facilities and associated site office oversight methodology. The inspection will consist of an evaluation of the procedures and processes that establish the IVR or similar process, as well as an evaluation of IVR or similar processes implementation and oversight. Review of implementation at a site may include any or all of the following activities:

449

2014 Wind Program Peer Review Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Wind Program Peer Review Meeting was held March 24-28, 2014 in Arlington, VA. Principle investigators from the Energy Department, National Laboratories, academic, and industry representatives presented the progress of their DOE-funded research. This report documents the formal, rigorous evaluation process and findings of nine independent reviewers who examined the technical, scientific, and business results of Wind Program funded projects, as well as the productivity and management effectiveness of the Wind Program itself.

450

PEER REVIEW PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect

The Institute for Regulatory Science (RS) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) jointly estab lished a peer-review program. As the program evolved, four types of review were established. A process for stakeholder participation in peer review eetings was also developed. While a committee established by the ASME provided oversight to the peer-review process, the RSI managed the day-to-day operations of peer review panels. In addition to the reports resulting from peer review of specific projects, several documents were prepared to facilitate the review process, all of which were widely distributed.

MOGHISSI, A ALAN; LOVE, BETTY R; STRAJA, SORIN R

2007-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

451

Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations - Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Reports Review Reports 2010 Review of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project, October 2010 Site Visit Report - Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility, June 2010 Independent Oversight Inspection of the Hanford Site Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program, June 2010 Site Visit Report - Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Fire Protection Design Review Process, May 2010 Independent Oversight Assessment of Environmental Monitoring at the Idaho National Laboratory Site, May 2010 Independent Oversight Focus Area Review of Specific Administrative Controls at DOE Nuclear Facilities, April 2010

452

Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Complex - June Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - June 2012 June 2012 Review of the Y-12 Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed from March 12 - 30, 2012. The objective of this review was to evaluate the extent to which the site management and operating contractor, B&W Y-12, a partnership of Babcock & Wilcox and Bechtel Corporation, and the Y-12 Site

453

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A consensus peer review of the current technical basis and the planned experimental and modeling program for the prediction of the long-term performance of waste package materials being considered for use in a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review A Compilation of Special Topic Reports Wastepackagematerials_PPRP_final.pdf Evaluation of the Final Report: Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review Panel Multi-Purpose_Canister_System_Evaluation.pdf More Documents & Publications Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking/Fatigue Modeling for Light Water

454

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012 July 2012 Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Idaho National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho National Laboratory (INL) preparedness for severe natural phenomena events. The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe natural phenomena event. Independent Oversight Review, Idaho National Laboratory - July 2012

455

Evaluation of Emerging Technology for Geothermal Drilling and Logging Applications  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Evaluation of Emerging Technology for Geothermal Drilling and Logging Applications presentation at the April 2013 peer review meeting held in Denver, Colorado.

456

Voluntary Protection Program On-site Evaluations | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Star recognition. September 14, 2012 Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC - September 2012 Evaluation to determine whether Facility...

457

Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Field Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies and Hydrogen Programs Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, June 7-11, 2010 -- Washington D.C.

458

Design and Evaluation of Novel High Capacity Cathode Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, May 18-22, 2009 -- Washington D.C.

459

Design and Evaluation of Novel High Capacity Cathode Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2010 DOE Vehicle Technologies and Hydrogen Programs Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, June 7-11, 2010 -- Washington D.C.

460

Develop & evaluate materials & additives that enhance thermal & overcharge abuse  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, May 18-22, 2009 -- Washington D.C.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Design and Evaluation of Novel High Capacity Cathode Materials  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Design and Evaluation of Novel High Capacity Cathode Materials Christopher Johnson and Michael Thackeray Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne Annual Merit Review DOE...

462

Evaluation of Li2MnSiO4 Cathode  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, May 18-22, 2009 -- Washington D.C.

463

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW FINAL REPORT  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT PWR GASIFIER PEER REVIEW REPORT 2/21/06 Background Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) signed a cooperative agreement with DOE on 9/30/04 to develop a novel gasifier concept, which is expected to improve the availability and efficiency of gasification-based power plants, and to reduce plant capital and operations costs. On 12/21/05, PWR submitted a proposal to continue development of their gasifier into the next phase. On January 24, 2006, a peer review was performed to review the work that PWR has done to date, their technical approach for future development, and to assess the potential benefit of the PWR gasifier and feed system technologies over state-of-the art coal gasification. The peer reviewers also evaluated a DOE analysis of the PWR refractory, and a DOE system study comparing the

464

Independent Oversight Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the Fire Suppression System at the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and the fire suppression system at the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory. The review was performed March 18-29, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was performed as one part of an ongoing targeted

465

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

466

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

467

Retrospective Cohort Study of Bronchial Doses and Radiation-Induced Atelectasis After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Lung Tumors Located Close to the Bronchial Tree  

SciTech Connect

Purpose: To evaluate the dose–response relationship between radiation-induced atelectasis after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and bronchial dose. Methods and Materials: Seventy-four patients treated with SBRT for tumors close to main, lobar, or segmental bronchi were selected. The association between incidence of atelectasis and bronchial dose parameters (maximum point-dose and minimum dose to the high-dose bronchial volume [ranging from 0.1 cm{sup 3} up to 2.0 cm{sup 3}]) was statistically evaluated with survival analysis models. Results: Prescribed doses varied between 4 and 20 Gy per fraction in 2-5 fractions. Eighteen patients (24.3%) developed atelectasis considered to be radiation-induced. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation between the incidence of radiation-induced atelectasis and minimum dose to the high-dose bronchial volumes, of which 0.1 cm{sup 3} (D{sub 0.1cm3}) was used for further analysis. The median value of D{sub 0.1cm3} (?/? = 3 Gy) was EQD{sub 2,LQ} = 147 Gy{sub 3} (range, 20-293 Gy{sub 3}). For patients who developed atelectasis the median value was EQD{sub 2,LQ} = 210 Gy{sub 3}, and for patients who did not develop atelectasis, EQD{sub 2,LQ} = 105 Gy{sub 3}. Median time from treatment to development of atelectasis was 8.0 months (range, 1.1-30.1 months). Conclusion: In this retrospective study a significant dose–response relationship between the incidence of atelectasis and the dose to the high-dose volume of the bronchi is shown.

Karlsson, Kristin, E-mail: kristin.karlsson@karolinska.se [Department of Medical Physics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm (Sweden); Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (Sweden); Nyman, Jan [Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg (Sweden); Baumann, Pia; Wersäll, Peter [Department of Oncology, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm (Sweden); Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (Sweden); Drugge, Ninni [Department of Radiation Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg (Sweden); Gagliardi, Giovanna [Department of Medical Physics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm (Sweden); Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (Sweden); Johansson, Karl-Axel [Department of Radiation Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg (Sweden); Persson, Jan-Olov [Statistical Research Group, Mathematical Statistics, Stockholm University, Stockholm (Sweden); Rutkowska, Eva [Physics Department, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral (United Kingdom); Tullgren, Owe [Department of Oncology, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm (Sweden); Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (Sweden); Lax, Ingmar [Department of Medical Physics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm (Sweden); Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (Sweden)

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations - Guidance Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance Documents Guidance Documents Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office Protocols Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for the Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents, July 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for High Hazard Nuclear Facility Project Oversight, November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for Required Reading, June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for Small Team Oversight Activities, June 2012 (Rev. 1) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Qualification Standard for the Site Lead Program, May 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for Site Leads, May 2011

469

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tritium Tritium Facilities - December 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities - December 2012 December 2012 Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Savannah River Site Tritium Facilities The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs) at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Savannah River Site's (SRS's) Tritium Facilities (TF). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE.

470

Newspaper coverage of suicide and initiation of suicide clusters in teenagers in the USA, 1988–96: a retrospective, population-based, case-control study  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

SummaryBackground Public health and clinical efforts to prevent suicide clusters are seriously hampered by the unanswered question of why such outbreaks occur. We aimed to establish whether an environmental factor—newspaper reports of suicide—has a role in the emergence of suicide clusters. Methods In this retrospective, population-based, case-control study, we identified suicide clusters in young people aged 13–20 years in the USA from 1988 to 1996 (preceding the advent of social media) using the time–space Scan statistic. For each cluster community, we selected two matched non-cluster control communities in which suicides of similarly aged youth occurred, from non-contiguous counties within the same state as the cluster. We examined newspapers within each cluster community for stories about suicide published in the days between the first and second suicides in the cluster. In non-cluster communities, we examined a matched length of time after the matched control suicide. We used a content-analysis procedure to code the characteristics of each story and compared newspaper stories about suicide published in case and control communities with mixed-effect regression analyses. Findings We identified 53 suicide clusters, of which 48 were included in the media review. For one cluster we could identify only one appropriate control; therefore, 95 matched control communities were included. The mean number of news stories about suicidal individuals published after an index cluster suicide (7·42 [SD 10·02]) was significantly greater than the mean number of suicide stories published after a non-cluster suicide (5·14 [6.00]; pnewspaper reports about suicide (including specific story characteristics) and the initiation of teenage suicide clusters should provide an empirical basis to support efforts by mental health professionals, community officials, and the media to work together to identify and prevent the onset of suicide clusters. Funding US National Institute of Mental Health and American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.

Madelyn S Gould; Marjorie H Kleinman; Alison M Lake; Judith Forman; Jennifer Bassett Midle

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

REVIEW ARTICLE Cotton genetic resources. A review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REVIEW ARTICLE Cotton genetic resources. A review Mehboob-ur-Rahman & Tayyaba Shaheen & Nabila /Published online: 13 October 2011 # INRA and Springer-Verlag, France 2011 Abstract Since 6000 BC, cotton has cotton than in Gossypium barbadense, typical of Pima and Egyptian cotton. Much of the genetic diversity

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

472

EVALUATING NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND INFLUENTIAL FACTORS FOR  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

EVALUATING NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND INFLUENTIAL FACTORS Environmental Sustainability: Performance Measures and Influential Factors for OECD-Member Countries featuring reviews five studies that evaluate national environmental sustainability with composite indices; performs

473

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - July 2011 | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 2011 July 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - July 2011 July 2011 Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project The Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of selected engineering processes for the Waste Solidification Building (WSB) safety significant electrical system at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The purpose of this review was to assess the adequacy of the contractor's electrical system configuration management and design change control during construction and initial system turnover activities. Interviews and reviewed WSB Project Electrical System DCFs, an SDDR, and

474

Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Complex -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - February 2012 Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - February 2012 February 2012 Targeted Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Y-12 National Security Complex This report documents the independent targeted review of the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) preparedness for severe natural phenomena events, conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations and was carried out as the pilot for similar reviews at other U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites. The purpose of the targeted review

475

Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 morning 1 morning presentations Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review - Day 1 morning presentations The 2006 Peer Review Meeting for the DOE Energy Storage Systems (ESS) Program was held in Washington DC on November 2-3, 2006. Current and completed program projects were presented and reviewed by a group of industry professionals. Presentations from the Day 1 morning session are below. ESS 2006 Peer Review - NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative System for Energy Storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, SNL.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, ISEPA.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Superconducting Flywheel Development - Phil Johnson, Boeing.pdf ESS 2006 Peer Review - Bipolar NiMH Battery Development and Testing - James

476

Monthly Energy Review - May 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5) 5) May 2008 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu- ate, assemble, analyze, and disseminate data and information...."

477

Monthly Energy Review - February 2011  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1 D O E / E I A - 0 0 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 / 0 2 ) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

478

Monthly Energy Review - July 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7) 7) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu- ate, assemble, analyze, and disseminate data and information...."

479

Monthly Energy Review - May 2011  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

y 2 0 1 1 y 2 0 1 1 D O E / E I A - 0 0 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 / 0 5 ) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

480

Monthly Energy Review - September 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9) 9) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu- ate, assemble, analyze, and disseminate data and information...."

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "retrospective review evaluation" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Monthly Energy Review - December 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2) 2) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu- ate, assemble, analyze, and disseminate data and information...."

482

Monthly Energy Review - November 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1) 1) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu- ate, assemble, analyze, and disseminate data and information...."

483

Monthly Energy Review - August 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8) 8) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu- ate, assemble, analyze, and disseminate data and information...."

484

Monthly Energy review - August 2009  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9 9 August 2009 DOE/EIA-0035(2009/08) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

485

Monthly Energy Review - July 2007  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7 7 DOE/EIA-0035(2007/07) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

486

Monthly Energy Review - January 2009  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1) 1) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu- ate, assemble, analyze, and disseminate data and information...."

487

Monthly Energy Review - April 2007  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7 7 DOE/EIA-0035(2007/04) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

488

Monthly Energy Review - Janurary 2011  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

a n u a r y 2 0 1 1 a n u a r y 2 0 1 1 D O E / E I A - 0 0 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 / 0 1 ) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

489

Monthly Energy Review - October 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0) 0) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu- ate, assemble, analyze, and disseminate data and information...."

490

Monthly Energy Review - March 2007  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7 7 DOE/EIA-0035(2007/03) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

491

Monthly Energy Review - August 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

u g u s t 2 0 1 0 u g u s t 2 0 1 0 D O E / E I A - 0 0 3 5 ( 2 0 1 0 / 0 8 ) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

492

Monthly Energy Review - May 2007  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7 7 DOE/EIA-0035(2007/05) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

493

Monthly Energy Review - November 2009  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

09 09 November 2009 DOE/EIA-0035(2009/11) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

494

Monthly Energy Review - June 2007  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7 7 DOE/EIA-0035(2007/06) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

495

Monthly Energy Review - March 2011  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

r c h 2 0 1 1 r c h 2 0 1 1 D O E / E I A - 0 0 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 / 0 3 ) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

496

Monthly Energy review - September 2009  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9 9 September 2009 DOE/EIA-0035(2009/09) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

497

Monthly Energy Review - October 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 D O E / E I A - 0 0 3 5 ( 2 0 1 0 / 1 0 ) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

498

Monthly Energy Review - April 2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4) 4) April 2008 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, and trade; energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2), that: "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu- ate, assemble, analyze, and disseminate data and information...."

499

Monthly Energy Review - June 2011  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

J u n e 2 0 1 1 J u n e 2 0 1 1 D O E / E I A - 0 0 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 / 0 6 ) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-

500

Monthly Energy Review - November 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

N o v e mb e r 2 0 1 0 N o v e mb e r 2 0 1 0 D O E / E I A - 0 0 3 5 ( 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 ) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are statistics on total energy production, consumption, trade, and energy prices; overviews of petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and international petroleum; carbon dioxide emissions; and data unit conversions. Release of the MER is in keeping with responsibilities given to EIA in Public Law 95-91 (Depart- ment of Energy Organization Act), which states, in part, in Section 205(a)(2): "The Administrator shall be responsible for carrying out a central, comprehen- sive, and unified energy data and information program which will collect, evalu-