Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Supplemental Groundwater Remediation Technologies to Protect the Columbia River at the Hanford Site, Washington - An Update  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper provides an update on supplemental groundwater remediation technologies to protect the Columbia River at the Hanford Site in Washington State. Major groundwater contaminants at the Hanford Site are described, along with the technologies and remedial activities that will address these environmental challenges.

Thompson, K. M.; Rowley, R. B.; Petersen, Scott W.; Fruchter, Jonathan S.

2008-06-02T23:59:59.000Z

2

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington for the Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington file:///I|/Data%20Migration%20Task/EIS-0189-FEIS-Summary-1996.HTM[6/27/2011 11:21:59 AM] The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to analyze the potential environmental impacts of their proposed actions to assist them in making informed decisions. A similar Washington State law, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), requires State agencies, including the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), to analyze environmental impacts before making decisions that could impact the environment. A major emphasis of both laws is to promote public awareness of these actions and provide opportunities for public involvement. Because NEPA and SEPA requirements are similar, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Ecology

3

Evaluation and Screening of Remedial Technologies for Uranium at the 300-FF-5 Operable Unit, Hanford Site, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is presently conducting a re-evaluation of remedies addressing persistent dissolved uranium concentrations in the upper aquifer under the 300 Area of the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. This work is being conducted as a Phase III feasibility study for the 300-FF-5 Operable Unit on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy. As part of the feasibility study process, a comprehensive inventory of candidate remedial technologies was conducted by PNNL. This report documents the identification and screening of candidate technologies. The screening evaluation was conducted in accordance with guidance and processes specified by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations associated with implementation of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act process.

Nimmons, Michael J.

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

4

Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation Underground...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Division of Environmental Response and Remediation Underground Storage Tank Branch Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah...

5

Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Petitioner's  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion Department of Energy's response brief in opposition to the State of Washington's petition for review before the D.C. Circuit; Washington asked the Court to review DOE's decision to terminate development of a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, and to issue a preliminary injunction enjoining DOE from taking further action to terminate the program. Washington v. DOE - Respondents' Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion More Documents & Publications U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review

6

Remediation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The three most frequently used remediation technologies are discussed: (1) NAPL removal, (2) Pump-and-Treat, (3) Soil Vapor Extraction.

Oostrom, Mart; Falta, Ron W.; Mayer, Alex S.; Javandel, I.; Hassanizadeh, S. M.

2005-12-06T23:59:59.000Z

7

Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington , DC 20585 September 20, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY AND PROCUREMENT DIRECTORS FROM : SUBJECT: PAULBOSCO~~ - SENIOR PROCUhM~ OFFICE OF ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOSEPH F. WADDELL SENIOR PROCUREMENT NNSA OFFICE OF ACQ SITION MANAGEMENT Acquisition Savings Reporting Template Guidance The Department is continuing to make progress in its efforts to support the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Acquisition Savings Initiative, as well as the Department's Strategic Sourcing Program. After using our current reporting template for the past year, it was a good time to review the process and make adjustments where necessary. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has also noted in an audit that

8

Osmotic Remedial Response in a Galactose-negative Mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...proposed that an osmotic remedial allele produces an...The object of this investigation was to examine the...particular osmotic remedial mutant in some detail...possibility that the osmotic remedial response affects trans...is currently under investigation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This...

John Bassel; H. C. Douglas

1968-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

Remedial actions at the former Vitro Rare Metals plant site, Canonsburg, Washington County, Pennsylvania. Final Environmental Impact Statement. Volume I  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The environmental impacts associated with remedial actions in connection with residual radioactive materials remaining at the inactive uranium processing site located in Canonsburg, Washington County, Pennsylvania are evaluated. The Canonsburg site is an 18.5-acre property that was formerly owned by the Vitro Rare Metals Company. The expanded Canonsburg site would be 30-acre property that would include the Canonsburg site (the former Vitro Rare Metals plant), seven adjacent private houses, and the former Georges Pottery property. During the period 1942 through 1957 the Vitro Manufacturing Company and its successor, the Vitro Corporation of America, processed onsite residues and ores, and government-owned ores, concentrates, and scraps to extract uranium and other rare metals. The Canonsburg site is now the Canon Industrial Park. In addition to storing the residual radioactive materials of this process at the Canonsburg site, about 12,000 tons of radioactively contaminated materials were transferred to a railroad landfill in Burrell Township, Indiana County, Pennsylvania. This Canonsburg FEIS evaluates five alternatives for removing the potential public health hazard associated with the radioactively contaminated materials. In addition to no action, these alternatives involve various combinations of stabilization of the radioactively contaminated materials in place or decontamination of the Canonsburg and Burrell sites by removing the radioactively contaminated materials to another location. In addition to the two sites mentioned, a third site located in Hanover Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania has been considered as a disposal site to which the radioactively contaminated materials presently located at either of the other two sites might be moved.

Not Available

1983-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Remedial investigation/feasibility study work plan for the 100-KR-4 operable unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Four areas of the Hanford Site (the 100, 200, 300, and 1100 Areas) have been included on the US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA`s) National Priorities List (NPL) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). This work plan and the attached supporting project plans establish the operable unit setting and the objectives, procedures, tasks, and schedule for conducting the CERCLA remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) for the 100-KR-4 operable unit. The 100-K Area consists of the 100-KR-4 groundwater operable unit and three source operable units. The 100-KR-4 operable unit includes all contamination found in the aquifer soils and water beneath the 100-K Area. Source operable units include facilities and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of contamination.

Not Available

1992-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

11

Response of winter birds to soil remediation along the Columbia River at the Hanford Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Columbia River at the Hanford Site, located in south-central Washington State, USA, is a regionally important refugium for overwintering birds. Some of the river shoreline has been designated by the U.S. Department of Energy for environmental clean-up following past production of materials for nuclear weapons. We evaluated the effects of soil remediation on winter birds at six inactive nuclear reactor areas. Remediation activities consisted of daily excavation and removal of approximately 1,035 t of contaminated soil from previously herbicided and denuded areas located between 30 m and 400 m and mostly in line-of-sight of the river shoreline. Remediation activities had no apparent effect on numbers of riverine or terrestrial birds using adjacent undisturbed shoreline and riparian habitat.

Becker, James M.; McKinstry, Craig A.

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

Washington, DC'  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of. Energy of. Energy Washington, DC' 26585 , The Honorable Gene Eriquez .~ City Hall I55 Deer Hill Avenue + Danbury/Connecticut 06180 .. -r. - Dear Mayor Eriquez: Secretary of Energy Hazel O!Leary has .announced a knew approach -to openness in. the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications with the public. In support of th,is initiative, we are,pleased to forward the enclosed information, related to the former Sperry Products,'.Inc. site in your jurisdiction ,that performed,work for DOE or its predecessor agencies. Th,is informatipn is provided,for your information, use, and retenti~oh. DOE's Formeily Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for. identification of sites used by'DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their current radiological condition and,

13

Remedial investigation/feasibility study work plan for the 100-BC-2 operable unit, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This work plan and attached supporting project plans establish the operable unit setting and the objectives, procedures, tasks, and schedule for conducting the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) for the 100-BC-2 operable unit in the 100 Area of the Hanford Site. The 100 Area is one of four areas at the Hanford Site that are on the US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA) National Priorities List under CERCLA. The 100-BC-2 operable unit is one of two source operable units in the 100-B/C Area (Figure ES-1). Source operable units are those that contain facilities and unplanned release sites that are potential sources of hazardous substance contamination. The 100-BC-2 source operable unit contains waste sites that were formerly in the 100-BC-2, 100-BC-3, and 100-BC-4 operable units. Because of their size and geographic location, the waste sites from these two operable units were added to 100-BC-2. This allows for a more efficient and effective investigation of the remaining 100-B/C Reactor area waste sites. The investigative approach to waste sites associated with the 100-BC-2 operable unit are listed in Table ES-1. The waste sites fall into three general categories: high priority liquid waste disposal sites, low priority liquid waste disposal sites, and solid waste burial grounds. Several sites have been identified as candidates for conducting an IRM. Two sites have been identified as warranting additional limited field sampling. The two sites are the 116-C-2A pluto crib, and the 116-C-2C sand filter.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

14

Field Summary Report for Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Coumbia River, Hanford Site, Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes field sampling activities conducted in support of WCHs Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River. This work was conducted form 2008 through 2010. The work included preliminary mapping and measurement of Hanford Site contaminants in sediment, pore water, and surface water located in areas where groundwater upwelling were found.

L.C. Hulstrom

2010-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

15

Decontamination Technologies, Task 3, Urban Remediation and Response Project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the aftermath of a Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD, also known as a dirty bomb) it will be necessary to remediate the site including building exteriors and interiors, equipment, pavement, vehicles, personal items etc. Remediation will remove or reduce radioactive contamination from the area using a combination of removing and disposing of many assets (including possible demolition of buildings), decontaminating and returning to service other assets, and fixing in place or leaving in place contamination that is deemed 'acceptable'. The later will require setting acceptable dose standards, which will require negotiation with all involved parties and a balance of risk and cost to benefit. To accomplish the first two, disposal or decontamination, a combination of technologies will be deployed that can be loosely classified as: Decontamination; Equipment removal and size reduction; and Demolition. This report will deal only with the decontamination technologies that will be used to return assets to service or to reduce waste disposal. It will not discuss demolition, size reduction or removal technologies or equipment (e.g., backhoe mounted rams, rock splitter, paving breakers and chipping hammers, etc.). As defined by the DOE (1994), decontamination is removal of radiological contamination from the surfaces of facilities and equipment. Expertise in this field comes primarily from the operation and decommissioning of DOE and commercial nuclear facilities as well as a small amount of ongoing research and development closely related to RDD decontamination. Information related to decontamination of fields, buildings, and public spaces resulting from the Goiania and Chernobyl incidents were also reviewed and provide some meaningful insight into decontamination at major urban areas. In order to proceed with decontamination, the item being processed needs to have an intrinsic value that exceeds the cost of the cleaning and justifies the exposure of any workers during the decontamination process(es). In the case of an entire building, the value may be obvious; it's costly to replace the structure. For a smaller item such as a vehicle or painting, the cost versus benefit of decontamination needs to be evaluated. This will be determined on a case by case basis and again is beyond the scope of this report, although some thoughts on decontamination of unique, personal and high value items are given. But, this is clearly an area that starting discussions and negotiations early on will greatly benefit both the economics and timeliness of the clean up. In addition, high value assets might benefit from pre-event protection such as protective coatings or HEPA filtered rooms to prevent contaminated outside air from entering the room (e.g., an art museum).

Heiser,J.; Sullivan, T.

2009-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

16

Washington. DC,20585  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington. DC,20585 Washington. DC,20585 MAY' i 1995 .- The Honorable Freeman R. Bosley, Jr. ' r City Hall 1200 Narket Street St. Louis, Missouri 63103 Dear Mayor Bosley: ,'~ ,. : !' Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary'has announced a new approach to'openness'in " the Department of,Energy"(DOE) and its communications with the pu~blic. In 'support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the enclosed information rel,ated to the former Petrolite Corp. site in your jurisdiction that,performed, work for DDE or,i.ts predecessor agencies. your information, use, and retention. This information is provided for DDE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identification of sites used by DDE's predecessor agencies, determining their

17

Washington, DC,20585  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

>/gGq ' >/gGq ' ,, ' .. Department of Edgy Washington, DC,20585 ,I ' , APR 0 4 1995 The Honorable Patrick Ungaro 26 S. Phelps Street Youngstown, Ohio 44503 .' Dear );layor.Ungaro: Secretary of'Energy Hazel O'Leary has announced a new approach to openness in the Oepartment of Energy (DOE) and its coannunications with the public. In support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the,enclosed information related to the former Ajax-Hagnethermic C,orp. site in your jurisdiction that performed work for DOE's predecessoragencies. This information is~provided for your information, use, and retention. DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identificationof sites used by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their current radiological condition and, where it has authority, performing-

18

Guide to ground water remediation at CERCLA response action and RCRA corrective action sites  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Guide contains the regulatory and policy requirements governing remediation of ground water contaminated with hazardous waste [including radioactive mixed waste (RMW)], hazardous substances, or pollutants/contaminants that present (or may present) an imminent and substantial danger. It was prepared by the Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance, RCRA/CERCLA Division (EH-413), to assist Environmental Program Managers (ERPMs) who often encounter contaminated ground water during the performance of either response actions under CERCLA or corrective actions under Subtitle C of RCRA. The Guide begins with coverage of the regulatory and technical issues that are encountered by ERPM`s after a CERCLA Preliminary Assessment/Site Investigation (PA/SI) or the RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA) have been completed and releases into the environment have been confirmed. It is based on the assumption that ground water contamination is present at the site, operable unit, solid waste management unit, or facility. The Guide`s scope concludes with completion of the final RAs/corrective measures and a determination by the appropriate regulatory agencies that no further response action is necessary.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Updated Site Response Analyses for the Waste Treatment Plant, DOE Hanford, Site, Washington.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document describes the calculations performed to develop updated relative amplification functions for the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) facility at the DOE Hanford Site, Washington State. The original 2,000-year return period design spectra for the WTP were based on the results of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) performed for the DOE Hanford Site by Geomatrix (1996). Geomatrix (1996) performed the PSHA using empirical soil-site ground motion models based primarily on recordings from California. As part of that study, site response analyses were performed to evaluate ground motions at the Hanford sites and California deep soil sites. As described in Appendix A of Geomatrix (1996), characteristic site profiles and dynamic soil properties representative of conditions at various Hanford sites and California deep soil strong motion recording stations were defined. Relative site responses of the Hanford profiles and California profiles were then compared. Based on the results of those site response analyses, it was concluded that ground motions at the Hanford sites underlain by deep soil deposits are similar in character to those on California deep soil sites and it was judged appropriate to use empirical deep soil site attenuation relationships based primarily on California ground motion data to develop design spectra for the Hanford sites. In a subsequent analysis, Geomatrix (2003) updated the site response analyses of Geomatrix (1996, Appendix A) to incorporate randomization of the California and Hanford profiles. The results of that analysis also led to the conclusion that the response of the Hanford profiles was similar to the response of deep soil sites in California.

Youngs, Robert R.

2007-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

20

Field Summary Report for Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River, Hanford Site, Washington, Collection of Surface Water, River Sediments, and Island Soils  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report has been prepared in support of the remedial investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River and describes the 2008/2009 data collection efforts. This report documents field activities associated with collection of sediment, river water, and soil in and adjacent to the Columbia River near the Hanford Site and in nearby tributaries.

L. C. Hulstrom

2009-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Observational Approach to Chromium Site Remediation - 13266  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Production reactors at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site in Richland, Washington, required massive quantities of water for reactor cooling and material processing. To reduce corrosion and the build-up of scale in pipelines and cooling systems, sodium dichromate was added to the water feedstock. Spills and other releases at the makeup facilities, as well as leaks from miles of pipelines, have led to numerous areas with chromium-contaminated soil and groundwater, threatening fish populations in the nearby Columbia River. Pump-and-treat systems have been installed to remove chromium from the groundwater, but significant contamination remain in the soil column and poses a continuing threat to groundwater and the Columbia River. Washington Closure Hanford, DOE, and regulators are working on a team approach that implements the observational approach, a strategy for effectively dealing with the uncertainties inherent in subsurface conditions. Remediation of large, complex waste sites at a federal facility is a daunting effort. It is particularly difficult to perform the work in an environment of rapid response to changing field and contamination conditions. The observational approach, developed by geotechnical engineers to accommodate the inherent uncertainties in subsurface conditions, is a powerful and appropriate method for site remediation. It offers a structured means of quickly moving into full remediation and responding to the variations and changing conditions inherent in waste site cleanups. A number of significant factors, however, complicate the application of the observational approach for chromium site remediation. Conceptual models of contamination and site conditions are difficult to establish and get consensus on. Mid-stream revisions to the design of large excavations are time-consuming and costly. And regulatory constraints and contract performance incentives can be impediments to the flexible responses required under the observational approach. The WCH project team is working closely with stakeholders and taking a number of steps to meet these challenges in a continuing effort to remediate chromium contaminated soil in an efficient and cost-effective manner. (authors)

Scott Myers, R. [Washington Closure Hanford, 2620 Fermi, Richland, Washington 99354 (United States)] [Washington Closure Hanford, 2620 Fermi, Richland, Washington 99354 (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

22

Response of wintering bald eagles to industrial construction in southeastern Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Columbia River at the Hanford Site is a regionally important refugium for overwintering birds. Some of the river shoreline has been designated by the U.S. Department of Energy for environmental clean-up following past production of materials for nuclear weapons. We evaluated the effects of soil remediation on winter birds at six inactive nuclear reactor areas. Remediation activities consisted of daily removal of approximately 1,035 t of contaminated soil from previously herbicided and denuded areas located between 30 m and 400 m and in partial line-of-sight of the river shoreline. Remediation activities had no apparent effect on numbers of riverine or terrestrial birds using adjacent undisturbed shoreline and riparian habitat.

Becker, James M.

2002-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

University Responses to MPCA's Preliminary Written Comments to the UMore East Remedial Investigation Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Remedial Investigation Report (July 12, 2012) Shortly before a meeting at the Minnesota Pollution Control: The ecological risk screening numbers were taken from the USACE site investigation reports. An RI Addendum may be consistent with MPCA and EPA guidelines for the investigative part, however the U of M still

Netoff, Theoden

24

USE OF THE AERIAL MEASUREMENT SYSTEM HELICOPTER EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACQUISITION SYSTEMS WITH GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR RADIOACTIVE SOIL REMEDIATION - [11504  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Aerial Measurement System (AMS) Helicopter Emergency Response Acquisition System provides a thorough and economical means to identify and characterize the contaminants for large area radiological surveys. The helicopter system can provide a 100-percent survey of an area that qualifies as a scoping survey under the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM) methodology. If the sensitivity is adequate when compared to the clean up values, it may also be used for the characterization survey. The data from the helicopter survey can be displayed and manipulated to provide invaluable data during remediation activities.

BROCK CT

2011-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

25

100-D/H Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study /Proposed...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Remedial Investigation Feasibility Study Proposed Plan Nina Menard Washington State Department of Ecology 100-DH RIFSPP * Received Draft RIFSPP on December 14, 2012 *...

26

DOE Selects CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company for Plateau Remediation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company for Plateau CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company for Plateau Remediation Contract at its Hanford Site DOE Selects CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company for Plateau Remediation Contract at its Hanford Site June 19, 2008 - 1:29pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company has been selected as the plateau remediation contractor for DOE's Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $4.5 billion over ten years (a five-year base period with the option to extend it for another five years). CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company is a limited liability company formed by CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. The team also includes AREVA Federal

27

Field Sampling and Analysis Plan for the Remedial Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Responses to comments  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides responses to US Environmental Protection Agency Region IV EPA-M and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Oversite Division (TDEC-O) comments on report ORNL/ER-58, Field Sampling and Analysis Plan for the Remedial Investigation of Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 2 consists of the White Oak Creek (WOC) drainage system downgradient of the major ORNL WAGs in the WOC watershed. A strategy for the remedial investigation (RI) of WAG2 was developed in report ES/ER-14&Dl, Remedial Investigation Plan for Waste Area Grouping 2 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This strategy takes full advantage of WAG2`s role as an integrator of contaminant releases from the ORNL WAGs in the WOC watershed, and takes full advantage of WAG2`s role as a conduit for contaminants from the ORNL site to the Clinch River. The strategy calls for a multimedia environmental monitoring and characterization program to be conducted in WAG2 while upgradient contaminant sources are being remediated. This monitoring and characterization program will (1) identify and quantify contaminant fluxes, (2) identify pathways of greatest concern for human health and environmental risk, (3) improve conceptual models of contaminant movement, (4) support the evaluation of remedial alternatives, (5) support efforts to prioritize sites for remediation, (6) document the reduction in contaminant fluxes following remediation, and (7) support the eventual remediation of WAG2. Following this strategy, WAG2 has been termed an ``integrator WAG,`` and efforts in WAG2 over the short term are directed toward supporting efforts to remediate the contaminant ``source WAGS`` at ORNL.

Not Available

1992-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

28

Washington, DC~ZO585  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

jpfl.3%2' jpfl.3%2' ) .,Departhent of Eikrgj! : Washington, DC~ZO585 .-, , , Lf; I: ~.1,' .Yj4 , The Honorable Louis Barlup 55 ,E. Main Street Waynesboro;,Pennsy,lvania 17268 '~ Dear Mayor Barl,up:' Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary has'announced' a new approach to openness,in the Department of Energy-(DOE) and its communications with the public. In support-of this initiative, we are pleased.to forward the enclosed information related to the former Landis Machine Tool Co. site in your jurisdiction that performed work for DOE or its predecessor agencies. This information:is provided for your information< use, and retention. DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identification of sites used by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their

29

Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

for the Environmental for the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1992 U.S. Department of Energy Richland, Washington 99352 Contents 1 . 0 Summary . . 2.0 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action . . . . . . 3.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Proposed Action 3.2 Onsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Offsite Alternatives . . . . . . . . . 3.4 No Action Alternative ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.0 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 Environmental Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Construction Impacts 5.1.1 Atmospheric Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Terrestrial Impacts . 5.1.3 Impacts on CERCLA Remedial Actions . 5.1.4 Construction Accidents .

30

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 26, 1997 February 26, 1997 EIS-0189: Record of Decision Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, WA December 1, 1996 EA-1111: Final Environmental Assessment K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 21, 1996 EA-1177: Final Environmental Assessment Salvage/Demolition of 200 West Area, 200 East Area, and 300 Area Steam Plants August 1, 1996 EIS-0189: Final Environmental Impact Statement Tank Waste Remediation System, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1996 EIS-0244: Final Environmental Impact Statement Plutonium Finishing Plant Stabilization April 1, 1996 EIS-0259: Final Environmental Impact Statement Disposal of Decommissioned, Defueled Cruiser, Ohio Class, Los Angeles and Class Naval Reactor Plants April 1, 1996 EIS-0259: Final Environmental Impact Statement

31

Expansion of the Volpentest Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response Training and Education Center, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT EXPANSION OF THE VOLPENTEST HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING AND EDUCATION CENTER HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY November 2002 1 November 2002 U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact This page intentionally left blank. 2 November 2002 U.S. Department of Energy Finding of No Significant Impact AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA), DOE/EA-1412, for expanding training and equipment testing facilities at the Volpentest Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response Training and Education Center (HAMMER) on the

32

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 27, 1998 August 27, 1998 EA-1260: Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 27, 1998 EA-1260: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Transfer of 1100 Area, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 13, 1998 EIS-0229: Notice of Availability of the Amended Record of Decision Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials August 1, 1998 EIS-0245-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1998 EIS-0189: Supplement Analysis Tank Waste Remediation System July 28, 1997 EA-1203: Final Environmental Assessment Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site,

33

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I-Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

C, Risk C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives) Interim United States Office of Research and EPA/540/R-92/003 Environmental Protection Development December 1991 Agency Washington, DC 20460 EPA/540/R-92/004 Publication 9285.7-01 C December 1991 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives) Interim Office of Emergency and Remedial Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Printed on Recycled Paper NOTICE The policies set out in [his document are intended solely as guidance; they are not final U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) actions. These policies are not intended, nor can they be relied upon, to create any rights enforceable by any party in litigation with the United States. EPA officials may

34

Remedial Action Assessment System (RAAS): Evaluation of selected feasibility studies of CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act) hazardous waste sites  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Congress and the public have mandated much closer scrutiny of the management of chemically hazardous and radioactive mixed wastes. Legislative language, regulatory intent, and prudent technical judgment, call for using scientifically based studies to assess current conditions and to evaluate and select costeffective strategies for mitigating unacceptable situations. The NCP requires that a Remedial Investigation (RI) and a Feasibility Study (FS) be conducted at each site targeted for remedial response action. The goal of the RI is to obtain the site data needed so that the potential impacts on public health or welfare or on the environment can be evaluated and so that the remedial alternatives can be identified and selected. The goal of the FS is to identify and evaluate alternative remedial actions (including a no-action alternative) in terms of their cost, effectiveness, and engineering feasibility. The NCP also requires the analysis of impacts on public health and welfare and on the environment; this analysis is the endangerment assessment (EA). In summary, the RI, EA, and FS processes require assessment of the contamination at a site, of the potential impacts in public health or the environment from that contamination, and of alternative RAs that could address potential impacts to the environment. 35 refs., 7 figs., 1 tab.

Whelan, G. (Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (USA)); Hartz, K.E.; Hilliard, N.D. (Beck (R.W.) and Associates, Seattle, WA (USA))

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2011 6, 2011 CX-007504: Categorical Exclusion Determination 300 Area Nanoscale Research and Development Projects CX(s) Applied: B3.15, A9, B3.6 Date: 12/06/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 1, 2011 EA-1679: Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Power plant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties, Washington November 18, 2011 Demolition Begins on Hanford's Historic Plutonium Vaults - Plutonium Finishing Plant on track to meet regulatory milestone RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL) began demolishing a vault complex that once held stores of plutonium for the U.S. nuclear weapons

36

I ' Washington, DC'  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

' Washington, DC' ' Washington, DC' 20585 The.Honorable Don Trotter, 102' Public Square Clarksville, Tennessee '37040 '_ _' ' Dear Mayor Trotter: '. Secretary of Energy Hazel .O'Leary has announced a new the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward related to the Clarksville Foundry.& Machine Co. site approach to openness in with the publ,ic'. In " the~enclosed~information in your'jurisdiction that performed work for DOE or its predecessor'agencies. This information. is provided, for.your information, use, and retention. remedial action conservative' set of technical investigations to assure environment. If'you have any questions, please feel free~to call DrI W. Alexander Uilliams 301-427-1719 of my staff.

37

Seattle, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Location: Seattle, WashingtonSeed Funding: $20 millionTarget Building Types: Residential, commercial, and institutionalWebsites: www.communitypowerworks.orgwww.seattle.gov/environment/CPWmain...

38

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B, Development of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

B, B, Development of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals) Interim United States Office of Research and EPA/540/R-92/003 Environmental Protection Development December 1991 Agency Washington, DC 20460 EPA/540/R-92/003 Publication 9285.7-01 B December 1991 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B, Development of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals) Interim Office of Emergency and Remedial Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Printed on Recycled Paper N O T I C E The policies set out in this document are intended solely as guidance; they are not final U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) actions. These policies are not intended, nor can they be relied upon, to create any rights enforceable by any party in litigation with the United States. EPA officials may

39

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 13, 2010 October 13, 2010 CX-004253: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northwest Natural Devine Road Land Use Review Request CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 10/13/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 13, 2010 CX-004252: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Two Broken Transformers Near the Roza Dam Adult Trap Facility CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 10/13/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 8, 2010 EIS-0456: Final Environmental Impact Statement Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 460) October 8, 2010 EIS-0456: Final Environmental Impact Statement (Appendices) Cushman Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 460), Washington Comments and responses to DEIS-0456: Cushman Hydroelectric Project.

40

X-701B Groundwater Remedy Portsmouth Ohio  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

X-701B Groundwater Remediation X-701B Groundwater Remediation ETR Report Date: December 2008 ETR-20 United States Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) External Technical Review of the X-701B Groundwater Remedy, Portsmouth, Ohio Why DOE-EM Did This Review The Department of Energy (DOE) Portsmouth Paducah Project Office (PPPO) has responsibility for remediation of the X-701B ground water plume with the key contaminant of trichloroethene (TCE). The remedy has been divided into four phases: Phase I- Initial Source Area Treatment, Phase II-Expanded Source Area Treatment, Phase III-Evaluation and Reporting, and Phase IV- Downgradient Remediation and Confirmation of Source Area Treatment. Phase II treatment has injected

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Advanced Remediation Technologies  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for the cleanup of nation's nuclear weapons program legacy wastes, along with waste associated with nuclear energy programs and research. The EM cleanup efforts continue to progress, however the cleanup continues to be technologically complex, heavily regulated, long-term; and the effort also has a high life cycle cost estimate (LCCE) effort. Over the past few years, the EM program has undergone several changes to accelerate its cleanup efforts with varying degrees of success. This article will provide some insight into the Advanced Remediation Technologies (ART) projects that may enhance cleanup efforts and reduce life cycle costs. (authors)

Krahn, St.; Miller, C.E. [The United States Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Washington, D.C. (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Management Federal Energy Management Program Federal/Utility Partnership Working Group David McAndrew April 14, 2010 Providence RI Washington Update Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 3 Presentation Overview * EO 13514 - Strategic Sustainability Plans * DOE's approach * EISA section 432 update * Outreach Opportunities - Federal Energy Management Awards - Energy Empowers Campaign - GovEnergy Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 4 EO13514 Sustainability Plans Update Federal Energy Management Program femp.energy.gov 5 EO 13514 Goals In addition to GHG goals, the EO requires agencies to meet sustainability targets, including: * 30% reduction in vehicle fleet petroleum use by 2020; * 26% reduction in potable, industrial, landscaping, and agricultural water consumption by 2020;

43

Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii Federal Energy Management Program Federal/Utility Partnership Working Group David McAndrew October 20, 2010 Rapid City, SD Washington Update 2 | Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview * FEMP Updates * GHG Guidance Update * EISA Section 432 Update * Mark Your Calendar 3 | Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) eere.energy.gov * Richard Kidd is leaving FEMP - Will become Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Energy and Sustainability - Skye Schell will assume the role of interim Program Manager * Jesse Feinberg (Energetics) departed over the summer to attend grad school Columbia * Sarah Mabbitt (smabbitt@energetics.com)

44

Department Washington,  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Washington, of Energy DC 20545 Mr. Roy J. Villella, Jr. Assistant Secretary Diebold, Incorporated 818 Mulberry Road, S.E. F. 0. Box 8230 Canton, Ohio 44711-8230 Dear Mr..Villella: Enclosed is your copy of the signed consent form for the survey of those portions of the Diebold property used by the former owner, Herring Hall and Marvin Safe Company, to machine uranium rod for the Manhattan Engineer District. I have directed our contractor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), to coordinate the specific time and details for the visit and survey. Mr. Woodrow Cottrell, ORNL, or his representative, will be contacting you in this regard. If you have any questions regarding the survey, please call me at (301) 353-5439. Sincerely, Andrew Wallo III, Designation

45

Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Management Program Federal Energy Management Program Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Meeting: Washington Update Dr. Timothy Unruh October 25-26, 2011 Philadelphia, PA 2 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov Presentation Overview  Federal Government Goals and Status  FEMP Update  UESC Program Overview and Goals  Mark Your Calendar: Spring 2012 FUPWG 3 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov FEMP's Mission FEMP provides the services, tools, and expertise to Federal agencies to help them achieve their legislated and executive ordered energy, greenhouse gas, and water goals. This is delivered through project financing services, technical assistance, and communications and training. 4 | Federal Energy Management Program eere.energy.gov

46

The Honorable Robert E. Williams 44 W. Washington Street  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

SEC ; : ' SEC ; : ' ,-<- I ;;;s The Honorable Robert E. Williams 44 W. Washington Street Shelbyville, Indiana 46176 Dear Mayor Williams: Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary has announced a new approach to openness in the Department of Energy (DOE) and its communications with the public. In support of this initiative, we are pleased to forward the enclosed information related to the former General Electric Co. site in your jurisdiction that performed work for DOE or its predecessor agencies. This information is provided for your information, use, and retention. DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program is responsible for identification of sites used by DOE's predecessor agencies, determining their current radiological condition and, where it has authority, performing

47

SBOT WASHINGTON PACIFIC NORTHWEST LAB POC Kerry T. Bass Telephone  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WASHINGTON WASHINGTON PACIFIC NORTHWEST LAB POC Kerry T. Bass Telephone (509) 371-7526 Email kerry.bass@pnl.gov ADMINISTATIVE / WASTE / REMEDIATION Facilities Support Services 561210 Employment Placement Agencies 561311 Temporary Help Services 561320 Professional Employer Organizations 561330 Document Preparation Services 561410 Security Guards and Patrol Services 561612 Security Systems Services (except Locksmiths) 561621 Janitorial Services 561720 Landscaping Services 561730 Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal 562211 Remediation Services 562910 Materials Recovery Facilities 562920 All Other Miscellaneous Waste Management Services 562998 Office machine repair and maintenance services (except communication equipment) 811212 Communication equipment repair and maintenance services 811213 Precision equipment calibration and repair and maintanence services

48

Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hanford River Corridor Contract To Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC March 23, 2005 - 10:56am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman today announced that Washington Closure, LLC has been awarded the contract to manage the clean up and remediation of the Columbia River Corridor at the Department of Energy's Hanford Reservation in the state of Washington. The five-member team includes the Washington Group International Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Inc., Eberline Services Inc., and Integrated Logistics Services Inc. The Columbia River Corridor is composed of roughly 210 square miles along the outer edge of the Hanford Site. The contract calls for cleaning up and

49

Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC Department of Energy Awards Hanford River Corridor Contract To Washington Closure, LLC March 23, 2005 - 10:56am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman today announced that Washington Closure, LLC has been awarded the contract to manage the clean up and remediation of the Columbia River Corridor at the Department of Energy's Hanford Reservation in the state of Washington. The five-member team includes the Washington Group International Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Inc., Eberline Services Inc., and Integrated Logistics Services Inc. The Columbia River Corridor is composed of roughly 210 square miles along the outer edge of the Hanford Site. The contract calls for cleaning up and

50

Phase 1 remedial investigation report for 200-BP-1 operable unit. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, in Washington State is organized into numerically designated operational areas including the 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, and 1100 Areas. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in November 1989 included the 200 Areas of the Hanford Site on the National Priority List (NPL) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Inclusion on the NPL initiated the remedial investigation (RD process for the 200-BP-1 operable unit. These efforts are being addressed through the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Ecology et al. 1989) which was negotiated and approved by the DOE, the EPA, and the State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) in May 1989. This agreement, known as the Tri-Party Agreement, governs all CERCLA efforts at Hanford. In March of 1990, the Department of Energy, Richland Operations (DOE-RL) issued a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) work plan (DOE-RL 1990a) for the 200-BP-1 operable unit. The work plan initiated the first phase of site characterization activities associated with the 200-BP-1 operable unit. The purpose of the 200-BP-1 operable unit RI is to gather and develop the necessary information to adequately understand the risks to human health and the environment posed by the site and to support the development and analysis of remedial alternatives during the FS. The RI analysis will, in turn, be used by Tri-Party Agreement signatories to make a risk-management-based selection of remedies for the releases of hazardous substances that have occurred from the 200-BP-1 operable unit.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Remediation Experiences in Finland  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This chapter discusses remediation practices for addressing gasoline-impacted soil and ground water at several hundred Neste Marketing Limited (Neste ... in Finland. The first systematic investigation and remediation

Martti R. Suominen; Nancy E. Milkey P.G.

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

52

Tank waste remediation system retrieval and disposal mission readiness-to-proceed responses to internal independent assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is planning to make critical decisions during fiscal year (FY) 1998 regarding privatization contracts for the treatment of Hanford tank waste. Specifically, DOE, Richland Operations Office (RL), will make decisions related to proceeding with Phase 1 Privatization. In support of these decisions, the management and integration (M+I) contractor must be able to meet the requirements to support the Phase 1 privatization contractors. As part of the assessment of the Tank Waste Retrieval (TWR) Readiness-To-Proceed (RTP), an independent review of their process and products was required by the RL letter of August 8, 1997. The Independent Review Team reviewed the adequacy of the planning that has been done by the M+I contractor to validate that, if the plans are carried out, there is reasonable assurance of success. Overall, the RTP Independent Review Team concluded that, if the planning by the M+I contractor team is carried out with adequate funding, there is reasonable assurance that the M+I contractor will be able to deliver waste to the privatization contractor for the duration of Phase 1. This conclusion was based on addressing the recommendations contained in the Independent Review Team`s Final Report and in the individual Criteria and Review Approach (CRA) forms completed during the assessment. The purpose of this report is to formally document the independent assessment and the RTP team responses to the Independent Review Team recommendations. It also provides closure logics for selected recommendations from a Lockheed Martin Hanford Corporation (LMHC) internal assessment of the Technical Basis Review (TBR) packages. This report contains the RTP recommendation closure process (Section 2.0); the closure tables (Section 3.0) which provide traceability between each review team recommendation and its corresponding Project Hanford Management Contract closure logic; and two attachments that formally document the Independent Review Team Final Report and the Internal Assessment Final Report.

Schaus, P.S.

1998-01-06T23:59:59.000Z

53

Pinellas Remediation Agreement Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pinellas Pinellas Agreement Name Remediation Agreement for the Four and One-Half Acre Site in Largo, Pinellas County, Florida State Florida Agreement Type Remediation Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA/ Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended/ Florida Air and Water Pollution Control Act Scope Summary Remediation of property adjacent to the former Pinellas Plant Parties DOE; Florida Department of Environmental Protection Date 3/12/2001 SCOPE * Remediate the groundwater under a parcel of property adjacent to DOE's former Pinellas Plant to levels consistent with industrial use. * Complete remedial actions at the site in accordance with a Remedial Action Plan prepared by DOE and approved by FDEP. * Submit quarterly reports of interim remedial actions at the Site.

54

,"Washington Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050WA3","N3010WA3","N3020WA3","N3035WA3","N3045WA3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Washington (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Washington...

55

Washington's power supply collapse  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... ON 25 July 1983 the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) defaulted on 2,250 million of municipal revenue bonds. This, ... has been polemical and accusatory in nature, blaming the Washington State Supreme Court, the Bonneville ...

Roger H. Bezdek

1985-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

56

Overview of Green and Sustainable Remediation for Soil and Groundwater Remediation - 12545  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Making remediation efforts more 'sustainable' or 'green' is a topic of great interest in the remediation community. It has been spurred on by Executive Orders from the White House, as well as Department of Energy (DOE) sustainability plans. In private industry, it is motivated by corporate sustainability goals and corporate social responsibility. It has spawned new organizations, areas of discussion, tools and practices, and guidance documents around sustainable remediation or green remediation. Green remediation can be thought of as a subset of sustainable remediation and is mostly focused on reducing the environmental footprint of cleanup efforts. Sustainable remediation includes both social and economic considerations, in addition to environmental. Application of both green and sustainable remediation (GSR) may involve two primary activities. The first is to develop technologies and alternatives that are greener or more sustainable. This can also include making existing remediation approaches greener or more sustainable. The second is to include GSR criteria in the evaluation of remediation alternatives and strategies. In other words, to include these GSR criteria in the evaluation of alternatives in a feasibility study. In some cases, regulatory frameworks allow the flexibility to include GSR criteria into the evaluation process (e.g., state cleanup programs). In other cases, regulations allow less flexibility to include the evaluation of GSR criteria (e.g., Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)). New regulatory guidance and tools will be required to include these criteria in typical feasibility studies. GSR provides a number of challenges for remediation professionals performing soil and groundwater remediation projects. Probably the most significant is just trying to stay on top of the ever changing landscape of products, tools, and guidance documents coming out of various groups, the US EPA, and states. However, this process also provides new opportunities to think differently and look at the bigger picture of the overall benefit we are providing with our remediation projects. The opportunities from the move towards GSR are very real. They will help us make remedial actions truly more beneficial to the environment and to society. They will also allow (or force) remediation practitioners to think outside of the usual realm of approaches to find newer and more beneficial technologies. (authors)

Simpkin, Thomas J. [CH2M HILL, Denver, Colorado (United States); Favara, Paul [CH2M HILL, Gainesville, Florida (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

Groundwater Remediation and Modeling  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Because of the authors vantage point, this chapter is necessarily based on experience in ground-water remediation in the United States. Much of that...

Peter Shanahan

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

58

EIS-0189-S1: Tank Waste Remediation System, Richland, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

For this Supplement Analysis, in each of the potential impact areas for Project W-314, the proposed action was evaluated and compared to the TWRS EIS evaluation of the preferred alternative (Section 5.0). Qualitative and/or quantitative comparisons are then provided in this Supplement Analysis to support a determination on the need for additional National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis. Based on this Supplement Analysis, the potential impacts for Project W -314 would be small in comparison to and are bounded by the impacts assessed for the TWRS EIS preferred alternative, and therefore no additional NEPA analysis is required.

59

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Group International -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Group International - Group International - EA-2003-07 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Group International - EA-2003-07 October 23, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Washington Group International related to Falsification of Records and Procurement Deficiencies at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory This letter refers to the investigation conducted by the Department of Energy (DOE) into allegations that RTS Wright Industries, LLC, (RTS), a supplier for which Washington Group International (WGI) had direct contractual responsibility, had falsified quality control inspection records. These records pertained to the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Supercompactor Glovebox Suite at the Idaho

60

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 9, 1995 November 9, 1995 EA-1123: Final Environmental Assessment Transfer of Normal and Low-Enriched Uranium Billets to the United Kingdom, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 1, 1995 EIS-0212: Final Environmental Impact Statement Safe Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington October 1, 1995 EIS-0173: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Puget Power Northwest Washington Transmission Project October 1, 1995 EIS-0245: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington May 1, 1995 EA-0984: Finding of No Significant Impact Deactivation of the N Reactor Facilities, Richland, Washington May 1, 1995 EA-0984: Final Environmental Assessment Deactivation of the N Reactor Facilities, Richland, Washington

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 25, 1994 February 25, 1994 EA-0915: Final Environmental Assessment Waste Tank Safety Program Hanford Site, Richland, Washington January 1, 1994 EIS-0194: Final Environmental Impact Statement Tenaska Washington II Generation Project, Washington September 16, 1993 EIS-0119: Record of Decision Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington December 1, 1992 EIS-0119: Final Environmental Impact Statement Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington September 1, 1992 EA-0429: Final Environmental Assessment Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 10, 1992 EA-0881: Finding of No Significant Impact Tank 241-c-103 Organic Vapor and Liquid Characterization and Supporting

62

EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), 6: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington EA-1096: Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic), Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal for the U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration to fund the portion of the Washington Wildlife Mitigation Agreement pertaining to wildlife habitat mitigation projects to be undertaken in a cooperative effort with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Finding of No Significant Impact Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic) July 30, 1996 EA-1096: Final Environmental Assessment Washington Wildlife Mitigation Projects (Programmatic)

63

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS BUILDINGS NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS BUILDINGS VAN NESS STREET WASHINGTON, D.C. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Remedial Action and Waste Technology Division of Facility and Site Decommissioning Projects - __-~---- -._.. .._ .-. .- INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND Site Function Site Description Radiological History and Status CONTENTS ELIMINATION ANALYSIS REFERENCES ii Paqe 1 4 INiRODUCTION The Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear Energy, Office of Remedial Action and Waste Technology, Division of Facility and Site Decommissioning Projects (and/or predecessor agencies, offices, and divisions) has reviewed the past activities conducted for the Atomic Energy Commission and the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) (DOE predecessors) at

64

A Framework for Sustainable Remediation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

However, after more than 30 years of experience with remediation projects, it is now clear that remedial actions are frequently energy intensive, may produce their own pollutant emissions, and may disturb and cause controversy in neighboring communities. ... Regulators, industry, and communities recognize that sustainability principles must be integrated into remediation activities, and various sustainable remediation guidance documents have been developed. ...

Karin S. Holland

2011-08-11T23:59:59.000Z

65

Washington: Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington State Washington: Putting More Solar on More Rooftops in Washington State November 8, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis EERE SunShot...

66

Attenuation Based Remedies  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The mission of the Attenuation Based Remedies in the Subsurface Applied Field Research Initiative is to seek holistic solutions to DOEs groundwater contamination problems that consider not only...

67

2015 Washington Auto Show  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz attended the 2015 Washington Auto Show in Washington, DC on January 22, 2015. He delivered brief remarks on the Energy Department's role in electric and fuel cell vehicle technology, announced more than $55 million in funding opportunities to support fuel-efficient vehicle technologies and visited several of the exhibits featuring recent additions to the vehicles market.

68

2015 Washington Auto Show  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz attended the 2015 Washington Auto Show in Washington, DC on January 22, 2015. He delivered brief remarks on the Energy Department's role in electric and fuel cell vehicle technology, and visited several of the exhibits featuring recent additions to the vehicles market.

69

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 15, 2010 March 15, 2010 CX-001180: Categorical Exclusion Determination Monroe-Custer Number 1 and 2 500-Kilovolt Transmission Line Structure 16/2 Access Road Improvement and Bridge Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/15/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 12, 2010 CX-006365: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Spokane CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/12/2010 Location(s): Spokane, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 12, 2010 CX-006364: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Pasco CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/12/2010 Location(s): Pasco, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 12, 2010 CX-001182: Categorical Exclusion Determination

70

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

26, 2010 26, 2010 CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Everett CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 23, 2010 EIS-0119: Amended Record of Decision Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington July 22, 2010 CX-003234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition of Vacant House at Bonneville Power Administration's Ross Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/22/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2010 CX-003236: Categorical Exclusion Determination Augspurger Fiber Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B4.7 Date: 07/21/2010 Location(s): Skamania County, Washington

71

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

< < .. ,:. FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT FOR JESSOP STEEL COMPANY; 500 GREEN STREET: WASHINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA December 1991 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Restoration Elimination Report Jessop Steel Company CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................... .'. .... 1 BACKGROUND ............................. 1 Site Function Site Description : : : : : : : .................................... : Radiological History and Status ................. 2 ELIMINATION ANALYSIS ........................ 3 REFERENCES .............................. 4 Elimination Report Jessop Steel Company 1 INTRODUCTION The Department of Energy (DOE)., Office of Environmental Restoration, has reviewed the past activities of the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) and

72

The prevalence of folate-remedial MTHFR enzyme variants in humans  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...The hypothesis that folate-remedial alleles of MTHFR are those...response that is currently under investigation. In this way the activity...function and would be nutrient remedial. The contribution from common...The prevalence of folate-remedial MTHFR enzyme variants in humans...

Nicholas J. Marini; Jennifer Gin; Janet Ziegle; Kathryn Hunkapiller Keho; David Ginzinger; Dennis A. Gilbert; Jasper Rine

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 17, 2009 July 17, 2009 EIS-0424: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Klickitat Hatchery Program, Klickitat and Yakima Counties, WA July 1, 2009 EA-1660: Final Environmental Assessment Combined Community Communications Facility and Infrastructure Cleanup on the Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington April 21, 2009 EIS-0419: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Whistling Ridge Energy Project in Skamania County, Washington. March 12, 2009 State Energy Program Assurances - Washington Governor Gregoire Letter from Washington Governor Gregoire providing Secretary Chu with the assurances needed so that Recovery Act funds can be made available. These assurances are required by Section 410 of the American Recovery and

74

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 23, 2010 November 23, 2010 CX-004464: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Ferry Area Radio Communications Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 11/01/2010 Location(s): Franklin County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration November 19, 2010 CX-004524: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington State University Building Upgrades and Resource Conservation Manager CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 19, 2010 CX-004525: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Services Corps CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Kitsap County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

75

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 8, 2000 March 8, 2000 EIS-0169-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Use of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Yakima Hatchery and Acclimation and Research Activities, Yakima, Yakima County, Washington, Easton, Kittitas County, Washington September 15, 1999 EIS-0310: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Accomplishing Expanded Civilian Nuclear Energy Research and Development and Isotope Production Missions in the United States, Including the Role of the Fast Flux Test Facility September 1, 1999 EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 16, 1999 EIS-0169-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Yakima Fisheries Project-Natural Spawning Channels, Increased On-site

76

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21, 2011 21, 2011 CX-007750: Categorical Exclusion Determination Highlands Trail in the Longview-Cowlitz Number 1 Transmission Line Right-of-Way CX(s) Applied: B4.9 Date: 12/21/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration December 16, 2011 Cows like these in Skagit County, Washington, supply the biodigester developed by Kevin Maas of Farm Power up to 70,000 gallons of manure per day. The newest Farm Power facility in Washington generates enough electricity to power 500 homes. Photo courtesy of sea_turtle. Farming Out Heat and Electricity through Biopower The newest biodigester at the Farm Power facility in Washington generates electricity from biogas created from bacteria's anaerobic digestion of cow

77

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and...

78

ICDF Complex Remedial Action Work Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Remedial Action Work Plan provides the framework for operation of the Idaho Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Disposal Facility Complex (ICDF). This facility includes (a) an engineered landfill that meets the substantial requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle C, Idaho Hazardous Waste Management Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act polychlorinated biphenyl landfill requirements; (b) centralized receiving, inspections, administration, storage/staging, and treatment facilities necessary for CERCLA investigation-derived, remedial, and removal waste at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) prior to final disposition in the disposal facility or shipment off-Site; and (c) an evaporation pond that has been designated as a corrective action management unit. The ICDF Complex, including a buffer zone, will cover approximately 40 acres, with a landfill disposal capacity of approximately 510,000 yd3. The ICDF Complex is designed and authorized to accept INL CERCLA-generated wastes, and includes the necessary subsystems and support facilities to provide a complete waste management system. This Remedial Action Work Plan presents the operational approach and requirements for the various components that are part of the ICDF Complex. Summaries of the remedial action work elements are presented herein, with supporting information and documents provided as appendixes to this work plan that contain specific detail about the operation of the ICDF Complex. This document presents the planned operational process based upon an evaluation of the remedial action requirements set forth in the Operable Unit 3-13 Final Record of Decision.

W. M. Heileson

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

Energy Matters in Washington State  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Energy Matters in Washington State Energy Matters in Washington State www.energy.wsu.edu/library/ November 2009 #12;905 Plum Street SE, Building 3 P.O. Box 43169 Olympia, Washington 98504-3169 Energy University Extension Energy Program. 905 Plum Street SE, Building 3, P.O. Box 43169, Olympia, Washington

Collins, Gary S.

80

Phase I remedial investigation report for the 300-FF-5 operable unit, Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The focus of this remedial investigation (RI) is the 300-FF-5 operable unit, one of five operable units associated with the 300 Area aggregate of the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Hanford Site. The 300-FF-5 operable unit is a groundwater operable unit beneath the 300-FF-1, 300-FF-2, and 300-FF-3 source operable units. This operable unit was designated to include all contamination detected in the groundwater and sediments below the water table that emanates from the 300-FF-1, 300-FF-2, and 300-FF-3 operable units (DOE-RL 1990a). In November 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed the 300 Area on the National Priorities List (NPL) contained within Appendix B of the National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP, 53 FR 51391 et seq.). The EPA took this action pursuant to their authority under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA, 42 USC 9601 et seq.). The DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL), the EPA and Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) issued the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement), in May 1989 (Ecology et al. 1992, Rev. 2). This agreement, among other matters, governs all CERCLA efforts at the Hanford Site. In June 1990, a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) workplan for the 300-FF-5 operable unit was issued pursuant to the Tri-Party Agreement.

NONE

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

One Earth Future Foundation and George Washington University's Institute for Corporate Responsibility invite you a panel discussion on business and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). This event will bring  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

One Earth Future Foundation and George Washington University's Institute for Corporate associate at One Earth Future Foundation · Jonas Claes, program officer, US Institute of Peace · Raymond Earth Future Foundation by phone, 303.533.1707 or by email, rspivak@oneearthfuture.org. Best regards

Vertes, Akos

82

Sustainable Soil Remediation:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...wastes and creating new markets for the end products...study of the treatment of diesel-contaminated soil indicated...size and location of markets relative to waste production...remediation scenario for a diesel-contaminated site using...catabolic activity in diesel contaminated soil following...

David L. Jones; John R. Healey

83

Sustainable Soil Remediation:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...recognised since the birth of agriculture, the landspreading of industrial...full life cycle assessment (LCA). For example, blending high-nutrient-content...cradle-to-grave) of an LCA can also lead to misleading...remediation option is best. In LCA, impacts are classified as...

David L. Jones; John R. Healey

84

Summary - X-701B Groundwater Remedy, Portsmouth, Ohio  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

X-701B Groundwater Remediation ETR Report Date: December 2008 ETR-20 United States Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) External Technical Review of the X-701B Groundwater Remedy, Portsmouth, Ohio Why DOE-EM Did This Review The Department of Energy (DOE) Portsmouth Paducah Project Office (PPPO) has responsibility for remediation of the X-701B ground water plume with the key contaminant of trichloroethene (TCE). The remedy has been divided into four phases: Phase I- Initial Source Area Treatment, Phase II-Expanded Source Area Treatment, Phase III-Evaluation and Reporting, and Phase IV- Downgradient Remediation and Confirmation of Source Area Treatment. Phase II treatment has injected catalyzed hydrogen peroxide without meeting the

85

Radioactive Tank Waste Remediation Focus Area. Technology summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In February 1991, DOE`s Office of Technology Development created the Underground Storage Tank Integrated Demonstration (UST-ID), to develop technologies for tank remediation. Tank remediation across the DOE Complex has been driven by Federal Facility Compliance Agreements with individual sites. In 1994, the DOE Office of Environmental Management created the High Level Waste Tank Remediation Focus Area (TFA; of which UST-ID is now a part) to better integrate and coordinate tank waste remediation technology development efforts. The mission of both organizations is the same: to focus the development, testing, and evaluation of remediation technologies within a system architecture to characterize, retrieve, treat, concentrate, and dispose of radioactive waste stored in USTs at DOE facilities. The ultimate goal is to provide safe and cost-effective solutions that are acceptable to both the public and regulators. The TFA has focused on four DOE locations: the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington, the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) near Idaho Falls, Idaho, the Oak Ridge Reservation in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

86

Y-12 Plant remedial action Technology Logic Diagram: Volume 3, Technology evaluation data sheets: Part A, Remedial action  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Y-12 Plant Remedial Action Technology Logic Diagram (TLD) was developed to provide a decision-support tool that relates environmental restoration (ER) problems at the Y-12 Plant to potential technologies that can remediate these problems. The TLD identifies the research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation needed for sufficient development of these technologies to allow for technology transfer and application to remedial action (RA) activities. The TLD consists of three volumes. Volume 1 contains an overview of the TLD, an explanation of the program-specific responsibilities, a review of identified technologies, and the rankings of remedial technologies. Volume 2 contains the logic linkages among environmental management goals, environmental problems and the various technologies that have the potential to solve these problems. Volume 3 contains the TLD data sheets. This report is Part A of Volume 3 and contains the Remedial Action section.

NONE

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

15, 2010 15, 2010 CX-001639: Categorical Exclusion Determination Transportation Demand Management on 164th S/128th SW/20th SE CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/15/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 15, 2010 CX-001821: Categorical Exclusion Determination SGL Automotive Carbon Limited Liability Company (LLC) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/15/2010 Location(s): Moses Lake, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 31, 2010 CX-001386: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dragoon Creek Access to Bonneville Power Administration's Bell-Boundary #3 Transmission Line to Replace Existing Bridge CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B1.3 Date: 03/31/2010 Location(s): Spokane County, Washington

88

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

25, 2010 25, 2010 CX-003611: Categorical Exclusion Determination Schultz - Raver Number 3 and 4 500-kilovolt (kV) Transmission Lines Spacer Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): King County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003610: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ross-Lexington Number 1 Access Road Repair Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003609: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cushman North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 25, 2010 CX-003614: Categorical Exclusion Determination

89

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006064: Categorical Exclusion Determination Actions to Conserve Energy CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 20, 2011 CX-006089: Categorical Exclusion Determination

90

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 9, 2010 September 9, 2010 CX-003832: Categorical Exclusion Determination Issaquah Highlands Zero Energy Affordable Housing CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1, B6.3 Date: 09/09/2010 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 8, 2010 CX-003908: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fiscal Year 2010 Columbia Basin Fish Accords with Colville Confederated Tribes CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 09/08/2010 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 8, 2010 CX-003789: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grandview-Red Mountain Number 1 Proposed Transmission Line Interconnection CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/08/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington

91

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 15, 2011 February 15, 2011 CX-005262: Categorical Exclusion Determination Woodland and 148th Clearwire Wireless Communication Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.19 Date: 02/15/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration February 11, 2011 CX-005224: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/11/2011 Location(s): Bellevue, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 10, 2011 CX-005218: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/10/2011 Location(s): Renton, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

92

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 30, 2009 September 30, 2009 CX-000477: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install a Photovoltaic Power Generation Array and Electric Car Charging Stations, Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/30/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 23, 2009 CX-000476: Categorical Exclusion Determination 331 Building Irrigation Upgrades, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 09/23/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 16, 2009 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Kittitas Valley Wind Project September 15, 2009 EIS-0312: Record of Decision Washington-Action Agency Estuary Habitat Memorandum of Agreement

93

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

16, 2010 16, 2010 CX-003457: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sidewall Coring of Single-Shell Tank 241-A-106 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.11 Date: 08/16/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office August 13, 2010 CX-004960: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boeing Research and Technology -Low-Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/13/2010 Location(s): Kent, Washington Office(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy August 12, 2010 CX-003624: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replacement of Twenty 22-L Structures on the Satsop-Aberdeen Number 2 230-kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/12/2010 Location(s): Gray's Harbor County, Washington

94

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 3, 2010 May 3, 2010 CX-002190: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nisqually Indian Tribe of the Nisqually Reservation Energy Efficiency Retrofits of Tribal Center CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 05/03/2010 Location(s): Nisqually Reservation, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy May 3, 2010 CX-002438: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rocky Reach-Maple Valley Number-1 Transmission Line Bridge Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/03/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 30, 2010 CX-002137: Categorical Exclusion Determination Farm Power Lynden CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/30/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

95

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2011 22, 2011 CX-006583: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement Along Portions of the Grand Coulee-Chief Joseph #1 and #2 230-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.13 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Douglas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 22, 2011 CX-006580: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement Along the Grand Coulee-Okanogan #2 115-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.13 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Grant County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 18, 2011 EA-1728: Draft Environmental Assessment Integrated Vegetation Management on the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington August 15, 2011 EIS-0245-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site,

96

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20, 2011 20, 2011 CX-006817: Categorical Exclusion Determination McNary-Ross No. 1 Upgrade Project, Surface Impairment Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): Klickitat and Clark Counties, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 19, 2011 CX-006840: Categorical Exclusion Determination Security Barrier Relocation at the 618-11 Burial Grounds CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office, Golden Field Office September 19, 2011 CX-006839: Categorical Exclusion Determination Training Exercises and Simulations on the Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 16, 2011

97

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 17, 2010 December 17, 2010 CX-004835: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electric Vehicle Charging Stations City of Mill Creek CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/17/2010 Location(s): Mill Creek, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 16, 2010 CX-004691: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Kirkland, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 16, 2010 CX-004836: Categorical Exclusion Determination Marine and Hydrokinetic Technology Readiness Advancement Initiative CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Lynnwood, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

98

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010 CX-003023: Categorical Exclusion Determination Output Power Purchase Agreement with Northwest Energy Supply Cooperative - Barr-Tech, LLC Resource CX(s) Applied: B4.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Fishtrap, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 30, 2010 CX-002874: Categorical Exclusion Determination Game Farm Park Energy Efficient Replacement Lighting Project CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Auburn, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 30, 2010 CX-002873: Categorical Exclusion Determination Green House Gas Inventory CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 06/30/2010 Location(s): Auburn, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 24, 2010 CX-002876: Categorical Exclusion Determination

99

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 26, 2010 May 26, 2010 CX-002564: Categorical Exclusion Determination FPE Renewables, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 26, 2010 CX-002557: Categorical Exclusion Determination G.R. Silicate CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Hoquiam, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002567: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc. CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/21/2010 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clark Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1

100

Washington Closure Hanford, LLC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 19,2010 August 19,2010 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Neil Brosee President Washington Closure Hanford, LLC 2620 Fermi Avenue Richland, Washington 99354 WEA-201 0-02 Dear Mr. Brosee: This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding the employee fall that occurred at the Hanford High Bay Testing Facility (336 Building) on July 1, 2009. The worker sustained serious injury to his back and broke bones in both legs. Based on an evaluation of the evidence in this matter, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has concluded that violations of 10 C.F.R. Part 851, Worker Safety and Health Program, by Washington Closure Hanford, LLC (WCH) occurred. Accordingly, DOE is issuing the enclosed Preliminary Notice of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 30, 2010 September 30, 2010 CX-004092: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technologies for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 30, 2010 CX-004074: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cascade Community Wind Mid Scale Wind Turbines CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 29, 2010 CX-004145: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Low Energy Enzyme Catalyzed Solvent for Carbon Dioxide Capture CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09/29/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington

102

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 7, 2011 October 7, 2011 CX-006814: Categorical Exclusion Determination Columbia Rural Electric Association (Columbia REA) Dayton Substation Tap Line Project CX(s) Applied: B4.12 Date: 10/07/2011 Location(s): Dayton, Columbia County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 28, 2011 CX-006957: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project - Seattle Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Sandia Site Office September 26, 2011 EIS-0421: Record of Decision Big Eddy-Knight Transmission Project Wasco County, Oregon and Klickitat County, Washington September 26, 2011 CX-006843: Categorical Exclusion Determination ER52 Fire Station Warning Signals

103

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

13, 2010 13, 2010 CX-003035: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.7, B4.4, B5.1 Date: 07/13/2010 Location(s): Fox Island, Washington Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 12, 2010 CX-003628: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kittitas County Conservation Easement Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 12, 2010 CX-003447: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bridge and Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/12/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 12, 2010 CX-003240: Categorical Exclusion Determination

104

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 26, 2011 July 26, 2011 Hanford Reaches Recovery Act Goal for Waste Cleanup Ahead of Schedule - Workers Shipped 1,800 Cubic Meters for Treatment and Disposal RICHLAND, Wash. - Today, the Department of Energy Hanford Site announced it reached a cleanup goal more than two months ahead of schedule at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. July 25, 2011 CX-006290: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cardwell-Cowlitz 2011 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/25/2011 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2011 CX-006304: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grand Coulee-Bell #3/Grand Coulee-Westside #1 Insulator Replacement and Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/21/2011 Location(s): Grant County, Washington

105

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 18, 2009 November 18, 2009 CX-000195: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington County Pierce CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 11/18/2009 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 12, 2009 CX-000376: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boise White Paper Mill Carbon Capture and Sequestration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 11/12/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 4, 2009 Hydropower Upgrades to Yield Added Generation at Average Costs Less Than 4 cents per kWh - Without New Dams $30.6 million Recovery Act investment by the Department of Energy highlights the additional potential of hydro power November 2, 2009

106

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2011 2, 2011 EA-1858: Mitigation Action Plan Nippon Paper Industries USA Company Biomass Cogeneration Project May 1, 2011 EA-1679: Preliminary Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Powerplant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties, Washington April 28, 2011 CX-005892: Categorical Exclusion Determination Columbia River Inter-Tidal Fish Commission Use of White Bluffs Boat Launch and Hanford Town Boat Ramp for Salmon Tagging CX(s) Applied: B3.8 Date: 04/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office April 26, 2011 CX-005891: Categorical Exclusion Determination 200 Area Tank Farm Interim Surface Barriers CX(s) Applied: B6.9 Date: 04/26/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington

107

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

United States » Washington United States » Washington Washington December 24, 2013 The concrete "core" is removed from Tank C-105 after workers cut a 55-inch hole in the tank dome. Cleanup Progresses at the Office of River Protection RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Office of River Protection's (ORP) mission continues: to retrieve, treat and dispose of the 56 million gallons of radioactive and chemical waste stored in large, underground tanks. In 2013, ORP maintained steady progress toward the successful completion of its mission. December 24, 2013 Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Richland Operations Office's 2013 accomplishments ranged from cleaning up buildings and waste sites to treating a record

108

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2010 22, 2010 CX-002030: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Array and Charging Stations - Administration Building/Cathcart CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 22, 2010 CX-002029: Categorical Exclusion Determination Engine Generator for Enumclaw Dairy Manure Digester CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): King County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 22, 2010 CX-001830: Categorical Exclusion Determination YWCA Family Village at Issaquah CX(s) Applied: B2.1, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): King county, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

109

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 10, 2003 March 10, 2003 EIS-0330: Record of Decision Wallula-McNary Transmission Line Project and Wallula Power Project March 7, 2003 EA-1454: Finding of No Significant Impact Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F,100-H, and 100-N Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington March 6, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-128: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program March 3, 2003 EIS-0286: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington March 3, 2003 EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington March 3, 2003 EA-1454: Final Environmental Assessment Reactivation and Use of Three Former Borrow Sites in the 100-F,100-H, and

110

Washington.indd  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington Washington www.effi cientwindows.org March 2013 1. Meet the Energy Code and Look for the ENERGY STAR ® Windows must comply with your local energy code. Windows that are ENERGY STAR qualifi ed typically meet or exceed energy code requirements. To verify if specific window energy properties comply with the local code requirements, go to Step 2. 2. Look for Effi cient Properties on the NFRC Label The National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) label is needed for verifi cation of energy code compliance (www.nfrc. org). The NFRC label displays whole- window energy properties and appears on all fenestration products which are part of the ENERGY STAR program.

111

Remedial Action Performed  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

General Motors Site in General Motors Site in Adrian, Michigan Department of Energy OiZce of Assistant Manager for Environmental Management Oak Ridge Operations January 2001 69 Printed on recycledhcydable paper. CERTIFICATION DOCKET FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION PERFORMED AT THE GENERAL MOTORS SITE ADRIAN, MICHIGAN JANUARY 200 1 Prepared for United States Army Corps of Engineers Under Contract No. DACW45-98-D-0028 BY Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 CONTENTS FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................. TABLES ...............................................................................................................................................

112

Department.,of Energy Washington; DC'  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

,of Energy ,of Energy Washington; DC' 20585 JAN 1 1 1995 / .,, .- L ., The Honorable Thomas Menino ', 1 City Hall Square Boston, Massachusetts 02201 ,'. " p' ifi.. ' . .' b I,' \ Dear.Mayor.Me$ino: DOE's Formerly Util,ized for identification of sites.used by*DOEfs predecessor' agencies, determining, their current radiological condition and, where it has authority, performing remedial action to cleanup sites to meet current radiologicalprotection requirements.~ A conservative set of.technical evaluation guidelines4s used in these investigat~ions' toTassure protection of public health, safety and the .environment. Where DOE does not have authority.for proceeding, the available site information is forwarded to the appropriate Federal or State Agency,. DOE studied the historical records of the former ,Tracerlab, Inc. sitei'and it

113

Energy Incentive Programs, Washington | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Washington Energy Incentive Programs, Washington Updated January 2013 Washington utilities budgeted over 180 million in 2011 to promote increased energy efficiency in the state,...

114

Washington/Incentives | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington/Incentives Washington/Incentives < Washington Jump to: navigation, search Contents 1 Financial Incentive Programs for Washington 2 Rules, Regulations and Policies for Washington Download All Financial Incentives and Policies for Washington CSV (rows 1 - 184) Financial Incentive Programs for Washington Download Financial Incentives for Washington CSV (rows 1 - 163) Incentive Incentive Type Active Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Lighting Energy Efficiency Program (Washington) Utility Rebate Program No Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Energy Efficiency Incentives Program (Washington) Utility Rebate Program Yes Avista Utilities (Electric) - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Programs (Washington) Utility Rebate Program Yes Avista Utilities (Electric) - Commercial Food Equipment Rebates (Washington) Utility Rebate Program No

115

Washington: Washington's Clean Energy Resources and Economy (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document highlights the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's investments and impacts in the state of Washington.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

CENTRAL PLATEAU REMEDIATION  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A systematic approach to closure planning is being implemented at the Hanford Site's Central Plateau to help achieve the goal of closure by the year 2035. The overall objective of Central Plateau remediation is to protect human health and the environment from the significant quantity of contaminated material that resulted from decades of plutonium production in support of the nation's defense. This goal will be achieved either by removing contaminants or placing the residual contaminated materials in a secure configuration that minimizes further migration to the groundwater and reduces the potential for inadvertent intrusion into contaminated sites. The approach to Central Plateau cleanup used three key concepts--closure zones, closure elements, and closure process steps--to create an organized picture of actions required to complete remediation. These actions were merged with logic ties, constraints, and required resources to produce an integrated time-phased schedule and cost profile for Central Plateau closure. Programmatic risks associated with implementation of Central Plateau closure were identified and analyzed. Actions to mitigate the most significant risks are underway while high priority remediation projects continue to make progress.

ROMINE, L.D.

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

Washington County Comprehensive plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Overview of Washington County's Natural Resources 81 Inventory & Assessment - Natural Resources 81 Inventory & Assessment - Steep Slopes 82 Inventory & Assessment - Karst 83 Natural Resources Recommendations What Are the Key Findings from the Research? 13 Land Use 13 Economic Development 13 Housing 13 Natural

118

CENTRAL PLATEAU REMEDIATION OPTIMIZATION STUDY  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

THE CENTRAL PLATEAU REMEDIATION OPTIMIZATION STUDY WAS CONDUCTED TO DEVELOP AN OPTIMAL SEQUENCE OF REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTING THE CERCLA DECISION ON THE CENTRAL PLATEAU. THE STUDY DEFINES A SEQUENCE OF ACTIVITIES THAT RESULT IN AN EFFECTIVE USE OF RESOURCES FROM A STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVE WHEN CONSIDERING EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT AND STAGING, WORKFORCE MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION, WORKFORCE LEVELING, WORKFORCE SKILL-MIX, AND OTHER REMEDIATION/DISPOSITION PROJECT EXECUTION PARAMETERS.

BERGMAN TB; STEFANSKI LD; SEELEY PN; ZINSLI LC; CUSACK LJ

2012-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

119

Linear-response calculation of electron-phonon coupling parameters Department of Physics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057-0995  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Linear-response calculation of electron-phonon coupling parameters Amy Y. Liu Department of Physics, California 94551-0969 Received 19 December 1995 An ab initio method for calculating electron-phonon coupling for the calculation of lattice dynamics. Results for the mass enhancement parameter and the electron-phonon spectral

Liu, Amy Y.

120

Remedial Action Performed  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Baker and Williams Baker and Williams Warehouses Site in New York, New York, 7997 - 7993 Department of Energy Former Sites Restoration Division Oak Ridge Operations Office November 7 995 CERTIFICATION DOCKET FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION PERFORMED AT THE BAKER AND WILLIAMS WAREHOUSES SITE IN NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 1991-1993 NOVEMBER 1995 Prepared for United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office Under Contract No. DE-AC05-910R21949 BY Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 __ CONTENTS .- ~_- _- ..- ^_ FIGURES . ...,.,.....,,........,,.,_.....,.,.,.__,....,,,,, v TABLES ,.,__...,,....,..._._..,,,,_._...,.,.,,.,,,..._,,,, vi ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..v~

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Remedial Action Performed  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

' ' at the C. H. Schnoor Site, Springdale, Pennsylvania, in 1 994 Department of Energy Former Sites Restoration Division Oak Ridge Operations Office November 1996 CERTIFICATION DOCKET FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION PERFORMED AT THE C. H. SCHNOOR SITE SPRINGDALE, PENNSYLVANIA, IN 1994 NOVEMBER 1996 prep&ed for United States Department of ~nergy Oak Ridge Operations Off= r Under Contract No. DE-AC05-910R21949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. '14501 CONTENTS FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi UNITS OF MEASURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii

122

Remedial Action Performed  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Alba Craft Laboratory and Alba Craft Laboratory and Vicinity Properties Site in Oxford, Ohio C Department of Energy Former Sites Restoration Division Oak Ridge Operations Office January 1997 $$@T Op% 3 @!B . i~d!l Ab Printed on recycled/recyclable paper. CERTIFICATION DOCKET FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION PERFORMED AT THE FORMER ALBA CRAFT LABORATORY AND VICINITY PROPERTIES SITE IN OXFORD, OHIO JANUARY 1997 Prepared for United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office Under Contract No. DE-AC0591 OR2 1949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 CONTENTS Page FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................. v TABLES.. .............................................................................................................................................. vi

123

Remedial Action Performed  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Aliquippa Forge Site Aliquippa Forge Site in Aliquippa, Pennsylvania Department of Energy Former Sites Restoration Division Oak Ridge Operations Office November 1996 CERTIFICATION DOCKE.~ FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION PERFORMED AT THE ALIQUIPPA FORGE SITE IN ALIQUIPPA, PENNSYLVANIA NOVEMBER 1996 Prepared for . UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Oak Ridge Operations Office Under Contract No. DE-AC05-9 1 OR2 1949 Bechtel National, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee Bechtel Job No. 14501 CONTENTS Page FIGURES v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TABLES vii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii UNITSOFMEASURE ix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION xi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

124

Saxton soil remediation project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Saxton Nuclear Experimental Facility (SNEF) consists of a 23-MW(thermal) pressurized light water thermal reactor located in south central Pennsylvania. The Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation (SNEC), a wholly owned subsidiary of the General Public Utilities (GPU) Corporation, is the licensee for the SNEF. Maintenance and decommissioning activities at the site are conducted by GPU Nuclear, also a GPU subsidiary and operator of the Three Mile Island and Oyster Creek nuclear facilities. The remediation and radioactive waste management of contaminated soils is described.

Holmes, R.D. [GPU Nuclear Corporation, Middletown, PA (United States)

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

125

Surfactants and subsurface remediation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Because of the limitations of pump-and-treat technology, attention is now focused on the feasibility of surfactant use to increase its efficiency. Surfactants have been studied for use in soil washing and enhanced oil recovery. Although similarities exist between the applications, there are significant differences in the objectives of the technologies and the limitations placed on surfactant use. In this article we review environmental studies concerned with the fate and transport of surface-active compounds in the subsurface environment and discuss key issues related to their successful use for in situ aquifer remediation, particularly with respect to nonaqueous-phase liquids.

West, C.C.; Harwell, J.H.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

28, 2011 28, 2011 EIS-0423: Final Environmental Impact Statement Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury January 28, 2011 CX-005134: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provision of Funds to the Yakama Nation for the Purchase of Three Parcels of Property Along Reecer Creek CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 01/28/2011 Location(s): Kittitas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration January 28, 2011 EIS-0423: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Long -Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury January 21, 2011 CX-005130: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ringold Substation Structure Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 01/21/2011 Location(s): Basin City, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

127

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 12, 2011 January 12, 2011 The carbon steel doors come together to form an upside-down L-shape. The 102-ton door was set on top of the 85-ton door that was installed at the end of December. Hanford Waste Treatment Plant Sets Massive Protective Shield door in Pretreatment Facility Richland, Wash. -- Earlier this week, an enormous protective shield door was set in the Pretreatment Facility at the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant, also known as the "Vit Plant." The 102-ton door was lowered through the roof and placed on top of an adjoining 85-ton door that was installed at the end of December. January 10, 2011 CX-007074: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Vancouver CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 01/10/2011 Location(s): Vancouver, Washington

128

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 15, 2011 April 15, 2011 CX-005676: Categorical Exclusion Determination Murray-Custer #1 Transmission Line Wood Pole Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/15/2011 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 13, 2011 Algae samples back at the NREL lab, ready to be analyzed and run through the Fluorescent-Activated Cell Sorter, or FACS, which separates the cells. | Credit: NREL Staff Photographer Dennis Schroeder. Study: Algae Could Replace 17% of U.S. Oil Imports A new study from Pacific Northwest National Lab concludes that 17% of U.S. oil imports for transportation could be replaced by domestically-produced algae biofuels. April 12, 2011 Beep Beep! King County, Washington Is Charging Up Savings King County uses $6.1 million to make investments that dramatically reduce

129

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

24, 2011 24, 2011 Chemical engineer Alan Zacher 10 Questions for a Chemical Engineer: Alan Zacher Chemical engineer Alan Zacher took some time to share advice for students interested in science and engineering and give us the download on his work developing propylene glycol from renewable sources. March 24, 2011 CX-005523: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Bellevue CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/24/2011 Location(s): Bellevue, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 22, 2011 EIS-0245-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Determination Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, WA March 22, 2011 EIS-0422: Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Central Ferry to Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project

130

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2011 9, 2011 Department of Energy Announces $39 Million to Strengthen University-Led Nuclear Energy Research and Development 51 Projects Aim to Cut Carbon Pollution, Create Clean Energy Jobs and Strengthen America's Nuclear Energy Industry August 9, 2011 CX-006474: Categorical Exclusion Determination Biodiesel Crusher and Dryer Facility Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/09/2011 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 8, 2011 CX-006463: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/08/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 8, 2011

131

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 10, 2009 December 10, 2009 CX-000347: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000346: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 7, 2009 CX-000457: Categorical Exclusion Determination Focused Site Characterization for Carbon Dioxide Storage Along a Mount Simon Sandstone Fairway in the Michigan Basin CX(s) Applied: A1, A9

132

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 EIS-0333: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration, Benton County, Washington March 1, 2002 EA-1405: Final Environmental Assessment Transuranic Waste Retrieval from the 218-W-4B and 218-W-4C Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington February 27, 2002 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Mint Farm Generation Project February 27, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-46: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 27, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-45: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 15, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-42: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 1, 2002 EIS-0332: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

133

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 13, 2012 September 13, 2012 HAMMER Celebrates 15th Anniversary: Dedicates New U.S. State Department Field Exercise Building RICHLAND, Wash. - The Volpentest HAMMER Training Center, located at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site in southeastern Washington state, will mark its 15th anniversary of operations and dedicate a new Field Exercise Building for the U.S. State Department's counterterrorism efforts. September 6, 2012 Retrieval of Ninth Single-Shell Tank Complete Richland - Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) has completed the retrieval of radioactive and chemical waste from single-shell tank (SST) C-104, an underground storage tank that once held 259,000 gallons of waste left over from nuclear weapons production at Hanford. WRPS is the tank

134

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 16, 2005 March 16, 2005 EIS-0312-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan December 23, 2004 EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision Hopkins Ridge Wind Interconnection Project September 3, 2004 EIS-0346: EPA Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Salmon Creek Project, Water Flow Restoration and Streambed Rehabilitation, Providing Passage for Summer Steelhead and Spring Chinook, Funding, Okanogan County, Washington September 3, 2004 EIS-0346: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Salmon Creek Project August 27, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project August 27, 2004 EIS-0349: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project, Whatcom County, Washington

135

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-006063: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Firebreak Maintenance on the Hanford Site During Calendar Year 2011 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 24, 2011 EIS-0425: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA June 24, 2011 EIS-0425: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bonneville Power Administration Mid-Columbia Coho Restoration Project, Chelan and Okanogan Counties, WA June 22, 2011 CX-006255: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indian Cabin Road Repair Date: 06/22/2011 Location(s): Skamania County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

136

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11, 2011 11, 2011 EIS-0422: Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration's Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project March 11, 2011 CX-005421: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohop Underbuild Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6, B4.12 Date: 03/11/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 7, 2011 CX-005417: Categorical Exclusion Determination Beaver Creek Property CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 03/07/2011 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 4, 2011 Latest 200 Area Demolition Offers Snapshot of Hanford Cleanup Progress: Recovery Act Funding Allows Demolition of Power Houses Ahead of Schedule RICHLAND, WASH. - Today's safe and successful explosive demolition at

137

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2011 0, 2011 CX-006068: Categorical Exclusion Determination Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 14, 2011 Massive Cement Pour into Hanford Site Nuclear Facility Underway: Recovery Act Funding Puts U Canyon in Home Stretch of Demolition Preparations RICHLAND, Wash. - Hanford workers are pouring enough cement-like material to fill six Olympic-size swimming pools in one of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) largest nuclear facilities at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State to prepare the massive building for demolition. June 14, 2011 CX-006253: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Ross #1 230-Kilovolt, North Bonneville-Troutdale #2

138

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 15, 2010 June 15, 2010 CX-003090: Categorical Exclusion Determination Perform Routine Access Road Maintenance within the McNary-Ross Number 1 Transmission Line Corridor CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/15/2010 Location(s): Klickitat County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 11, 2010 More than $60 Million in Recovery Act Funding to Expand Local Energy Efficiency Efforts in 20 Communities Competitive block grants to support jobs, save money and increase energy independence June 10, 2010 CX-002767: Categorical Exclusion Determination Granite Mountain 3G Radio Station Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/10/2010 Location(s): Stevens County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 9, 2010 Clark County Develops On-the-Job Weatherization Training Program

139

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 15, 2002 October 15, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-112: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program October 6, 2002 EIS-0265-SA-92: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program October 2, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-110: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program October 1, 2002 EIS-0332: Mitigation Action Plan McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project September 30, 2002 EIS-025-SA-106: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program -106 SnoKing Tap to Monroe-Samamish Line) within Snohomish County, Washington September 26, 2002 EIS-0246-SA-29: Supplement Analysis Wildlife Mitigation Program, on the Spokane Indian Reservation, near Wellpinit, Stevens County, Washington September 26, 2002 EIS-0265-SA-90: Supplement Analysis

140

Effects of remediation amendments on vadose zone microorganisms  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Surfactant-based foam delivery technology has been studied to remediate Hanford 200 area deep vadose zone sediment. However, the surfactants and remediation amendments have an unknown effect on indigenous subsurface microorganisms. Microbial populations are important factors to consider in remediation efforts due to their potential to alter soil geochemistry. This project focuses on measuring microbial metabolic responses to remediation amendments in batch and column studies using Deep Vadose Zone Sediments. Initial studies of the microbes from Hanford 200 area deep vadose zone sediment showed surfactants sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) and remediation amendment calcium polysulfide (CPS) had no affect on microbial growth using BiologTM Ecoplates. To move towards a more realistic field analog, soil columns were packed with Hanford 200 Area sediment. Once microbial growth in the column was verified by observing growth of the effluent solution on tryptic soy agar plates, remedial surfactants were injected into the columns, and the resulting metabolic diversity was measured. Results suggest surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) stimulates microbial growth. The soil columns were also visualized using X-ray microtomography to inspect soil packing and possibly probe for evidence of biofilms. Overall, BiologTM Ecoplates provide a rapid assay to predict effects of remediation amendments on Hanford 200 area deep vadose zone microorganisms.

Miller, Hannah M.; Tilton, Fred A.

2012-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

U.S. Department of Energy Awards Portsmouth Remediation Contract To  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Portsmouth Remediation Contract To Portsmouth Remediation Contract To LATA/Parallax U.S. Department of Energy Awards Portsmouth Remediation Contract To LATA/Parallax January 10, 2005 - 9:45am Addthis $141 Million Small Business Contract Runs Through September, 2009 WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that LATA-Parallax Portsmouth LLC, a small business joint venture between Los Alamos Technical Associates Inc. and Parallax Inc., was awarded a $141,261,897 small business contract to perform environmental remediation and waste management activities at the department's Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Piketon, Ohio. The contract will run through September 30, 2009, and provides incentives to the contractor for managing costs effectively while completing the cleanup work.

142

The Management of the Plateau Remediation Contract, OAS-L-13-03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Management of the Plateau Management of the Plateau Remediation Contract OAS-L-13-03 December 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 21, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Management of the Plateau Remediation Contract" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Richland Operations Office (Richland) awarded a contract, effective October 1, 2008, to CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) to remediate select portions of the Hanford Site's Central Plateau. The contract, which could be extended for a maximum of 10 years, currently has a contract cost of $5.6 billion for authorized work. The

143

DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site December 8, 2008 - 4:58pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the award to Savannah River Remediation, LLC as the liquid waste contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $3.3 billion over the entire contract, consisting of a base period of six years, plus an option to extend for up to two additional years. The base performance period of the contract will be from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2015. A 90-day transition period will begin January 2, 2009.

144

U.S. Department of Energy Awards Paducah Remediation Contract | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Contract Contract U.S. Department of Energy Awards Paducah Remediation Contract December 27, 2005 - 4:56pm Addthis Paducah Remediation Services, LLC wins $191 Million Small Business Contract Competition WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Paducah Remediation Services, LLC (PRS) has been awarded a $191.6 million small business contract to perform environmental remediation and waste management activities at the Department's Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Paducah, Ky. The contract, awarded as a result of a competition, will run through September 30, 2009 and provides incentives to the contractor for managing costs effectively while completing the cleanup work on schedule. "We are pleased to be moving forward with work that will reduce risk,

145

DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Remediation, LLC for Liquid Waste Contract at Savannah River Site December 8, 2008 - 4:58pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the award to Savannah River Remediation, LLC as the liquid waste contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $3.3 billion over the entire contract, consisting of a base period of six years, plus an option to extend for up to two additional years. The base performance period of the contract will be from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2015. A 90-day transition period will begin January 2, 2009.

146

DOE Amends Decision for the Remediation of the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Amends Decision for the Remediation of the Moab Uranium Mill Amends Decision for the Remediation of the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings in Moab, Utah DOE Amends Decision for the Remediation of the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings in Moab, Utah February 29, 2008 - 11:43am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced an amendment to its 2005 Record of Decision (ROD) for the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project to allow for the use of truck or rail in transporting residual radioactive materials from the Moab site in Utah. These materials will be relocated to a new disposal site 30 miles north at Crescent Junction, Utah. "The Department is committed to ensuring the protection of human health and the environment in the Moab area and in the communities served by the Colorado River," Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Jim

147

Recommendations for Remedial Action at Everest, Kansas.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On September 7, 2005, the Commodity Credit Corporation of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (CCC/USDA) presented a Scoping Memo (Argonne 2005) for preliminary consideration by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE). This document suggested possible remedial options for the carbon tetrachloride contamination in groundwater at Everest, Kansas. The suggested approaches were discussed by representatives of the KDHE, the CCC/USDA, and Argonne at the KDHE office in Topeka on September 8-9, 2005, along with other technical and logistic issues related to the Everest site. In response to these discussions, the KDHE recommended (KDHE 2005) evaluation of several remedial processes, either alone or in combination, as part of a Corrective Action Study (CAS) for Everest. The primary remedial processes suggested by the KDHE included the following: (1) Hydraulic control by groundwater extraction with aboveground treatment; (2) Air sparging-soil vapor extraction (SVE) in large-diameter boreholes; and (3) Phytoremediation. As a further outcome of the 2005 meeting and as a precursor to the proposed CAS, the CCC/USDA completed the following supplemental investigations at Everest to address several specific technical concerns discussed with the KDHE: (1) Construction of interpretive cross sections at strategic locations selected by the KDHE along the main plume migration pathway, to depict the hydrogeologic characteristics affecting groundwater flow and contaminant movement (Argonne 2006a); (2) A field investigation in early 2006 (Argonne 2006c), as follows: (a) Installation and testing of a production well and associated observation points, at locations approved by the KDHE, to determine the response of the Everest aquifer to groundwater extraction near the Nigh property; (b) Groundwater sampling for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the installation of additional permanent monitoring points at locations selected by the KDHE, to further constrain the existing contaminant plume; and (c) Resampling of all existing permanent monitoring points for VOCs and biodegradation parameter analyses, at the request of the KDHE. On the basis of these studies (Argonne 2006a,c) and the CCC/USDA's past investigations at Everest (Argonne 2006b), the CCC/USDA concluded that groundwater extraction is not an effective remedial option for this site, and the KDHE concurred (KDHE 2006). As outlined in the next section, the CCC/USDA also believes that air sparging does not represent a viable remedial alternative. The CCC/USDA therefore proposes to collect the technical data required to evaluate the potential viability of a phytoremediation approach for this site and, if appropriate, to support the development of a remedial design.

LaFreniere, L. M. (Environmental Science Division)

2007-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

148

The role of innovative remediation technologies  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There are currently over 1200 sites on the US Superfund's National Priorities List (NPL) of hazardous waste sites, and there are over 30, 000 sites listed by the Comprehensive Environmental Responsibility, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS). The traditional approach to remediating sites in the US has been to remove the material and place it in a secure landfill, or in the case of groundwater, pump and treat the effluent. These technologies have proven to be very expensive and don't really fix the problem. The waste is just moved from one place to another. In recent years, however, alternative and innovative technologies have been increasingly used in the US to replace the traditional approaches. This paper will focus on just such innovative remediation technologies in the US, looking at the regulatory drivers, the emerging technologies, some of the problems in deploying technologies, and a case study.

Doesburg, J.M.

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

The role of innovative remediation technologies  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There are currently over 1200 sites on the US Superfund`s National Priorities List (NPL) of hazardous waste sites, and there are over 30, 000 sites listed by the Comprehensive Environmental Responsibility, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS). The traditional approach to remediating sites in the US has been to remove the material and place it in a secure landfill, or in the case of groundwater, pump and treat the effluent. These technologies have proven to be very expensive and don`t really fix the problem. The waste is just moved from one place to another. In recent years, however, alternative and innovative technologies have been increasingly used in the US to replace the traditional approaches. This paper will focus on just such innovative remediation technologies in the US, looking at the regulatory drivers, the emerging technologies, some of the problems in deploying technologies, and a case study.

Doesburg, J.M.

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

BUILDING 96 RECOMMENDATION FOR SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of the 1999 Operable Unit (OU) III Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study(RI/FS) and was designated as AreaOU III BUILDING 96 RECOMMENDATION FOR SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION FINAL Prepared by: Brookhaven REMEDIATION Executive Summary

151

Integrated Systems-Based Approach to Monitoring Environmental Remediation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for risk reduction and cleanup of its nuclear weapons complex. Remediation strategies for some of the existing contamination use techniques that mitigate risk, but leave contaminants in place. Monitoring to verify remedy performance and long-term mitigation of risk is a key element for implementing these strategies and can be a large portion of the total cost of remedy implementation. Especially in these situations, there is a need for innovative monitoring approaches that move away from the cost and labor intensive point-source monitoring. A systems-based approach to monitoring design focuses monitoring on controlling features and processes to enable effective interpretation of remedy performance.

Bunn, Amoret L.; Truex, Michael J.; Oostrom, Martinus; Carroll, Kenneth C.; Wellman, Dawn M.

2013-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

152

Integrated Systems-Based Approach to Monitoring Environmental Remediation - 13211  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for risk reduction and cleanup of its nuclear weapons complex. Remediation strategies for some of the existing contamination use techniques that mitigate risk, but leave contaminants in place. Monitoring to verify remedy performance and long-term mitigation of risk is a key element for implementing these strategies and can be a large portion of the total cost of remedy implementation. Especially in these situations, there is a need for innovative monitoring approaches that move away from the cost and labor intensive point-source monitoring. A systems-based approach to monitoring design focuses monitoring on controlling features and processes to enable effective interpretation of remedy performance. (authors)

Truex, Mike; Oostrom, Mart; Carroll, K.C.; Bunn, Amoret; Wellman, Dawn [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, Washington (United States)] [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, Washington (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

153

Remediation and Recycling of Linde FUSRAP Materials  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During World War II, the Manhattan Engineering District (MED) utilized facilities in the Buffalo, New York area to extract natural uranium from uranium-bearing ores. The Linde property is one of several properties within the Tonawanda, New York Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) site, which includes Linde, Ashland 1, Ashland 2, and Seaway. Union Carbide Corporation's Linde Division was placed under contract with the Manhattan Engineering District (MED) from 1942 to 1946 to extract uranium from seven different ore sources: four African pitchblende ores and three domestic ores. Over the years, erosion and weathering have spread contamination from the residuals handled and disposed of at Linde to adjacent soils. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) negotiated a Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) governing remediation of the Linde property. In Fiscal Year (FY) 1998, Congress transferred cleanup management responsibility for the sites in the FUSRAP program, including the Linde Site, from the DOE to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), with the charge to commence cleanup promptly. All actions by the USACE at the Linde Site are being conducted subject to the administrative, procedural, and regulatory provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the existing FFA. USACE issued a Proposed Plan for the Linde Property in 1999 and a Final Record of Decision (ROD) in 2000. USACE worked with the local community near the Tonawanda site, and after considering public comment, selected the remedy calling for removing soils that exceed the site-specific cleanup standard, and transporting the contaminated material to off-site locations. The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment, complies with Federal and State requirements, and meets commitments to the community.

Coutts, P. W.; Franz, J. P.; Rehmann, M. R.

2002-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

154

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Washington Information Washington Information to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Information on AddThis.com... Washington Information This state page compiles information related to alternative fuels and advanced vehicles in Washington and includes new incentives and laws, alternative fueling station locations, truck stop electrification sites, fuel prices, and local points of contact.

155

Independent Activity Report, Savannah River Remediation - July...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Remediation - July 2010 Independent Activity Report, Savannah River Remediation - July 2010 July 2010 Savannah River Operations Office Integrated Safety Management System Phase II...

156

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 19, 2002 July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-95: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-94: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Covington District Substations July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-96: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Snohomish District Substations July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-71: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, located in Umatilla and Sherman Counties, Oregon and Benton and Klickitat Counties, Washington July 19, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-70: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program July 8, 2002 EIS-0189: Notice of Intent Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Disposal of Immobilized

157

The 100-C-7 Remediation Project. An Overview of One of DOE's Largest Remediation Projects - 13260  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (RL), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Washington Closure Hanford LLC (WCH) completed remediation of one of the largest waste sites in the U.S. Department of Energy complex. The waste site, 100-C-7, covers approximately 15 football fields and was excavated to a depth of 85 feet (groundwater). The project team removed a total of 2.3 million tons of clean and contaminated soil, concrete debris, and scrap metal. 100-C-7 lies in Hanford's 100 B/C Area, home to historic B and C Reactors. The waste site was excavated in two parts as 100-C-7 and 100-C-7:1. The pair of excavations appear like pit mines. Mining engineers were hired to design their tiered sides, with safety benches every 17 feet and service ramps which allowed equipment access to the bottom of the excavations. The overall cleanup project was conducted over a span of almost 10 years. A variety of site characterization, excavation, load-out and sampling methodologies were employed at various stages of remediation. Alternative technologies were screened and evaluated during the project. A new method for cost effectively treating soils was implemented - resulting in significant cost savings. Additional opportunities for minimizing waste streams and recycling were identified and effectively implemented by the project team. During the final phase of cleanup the project team applied lessons learned throughout the entire project to address the final, remaining source of chromium contamination. The C-7 cleanup now serves as a model for remediating extensive deep zone contamination sites at Hanford. (authors)

Post, Thomas C. [U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office, Richland, WA 99352 (United States)] [U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office, Richland, WA 99352 (United States); Strom, Dean [Washington Closure Hanford LLC, 2620 Fermi Avenue, Richland, WA 99354 (United States)] [Washington Closure Hanford LLC, 2620 Fermi Avenue, Richland, WA 99354 (United States); Beulow, Laura [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 309 Bradley Boulevard, Suite 115, Richland, WA 99352 (United States)] [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 309 Bradley Boulevard, Suite 115, Richland, WA 99352 (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Washington Nuclear Profile - Power Plants  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Washington nuclear power plants, summer capacity and net generation, 2010" "Plant nametotal reactors","Summer capacity (mw)","Net generation (thousand mwh)","Share of State...

159

FUPWG Fall 2009 Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the 2009 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Washington update at the FUPWG meeting, held on November 18-19, 2009.

160

Recent developments: Washington focus  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Congress reconvened on January 23, but most of Washington`s January new involves the Administration. DOE sent two letters to USEC customers, awarded a contract for the independent financial review of the enrichment program, and released a plan for demonstrating AVLIS by 1992. A General Accounting Office (GAO) report investigating the impact of imports of Soviet EUP into the US was made public. Both Congress and the administration are reportedly considering a full-scope US-Soviet Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation. Finally, published reports indicate Congress may consider ending the customs user fee which levies a charge of 0.17% on the value of all imported goods. The fee is felt to violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and is not based on recovering actual Customs costs for processing a good. The fee brings the Treasury over $700 million per year, but the business community plans to lobby hard for its outright elimination or a change in authority to collect the fee based on actual costs.

NONE

1990-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

BERAC Meeting April 30 - May 1, 2003 Washington DC | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

30 - May 1, 2003 Washington DC 30 - May 1, 2003 Washington DC Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting April 30 - May 1, 2003 Washington DC Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page BERAC Meeting April 30 - May 1, 2003 Washington, DC Agenda .pdf file (8KB) Presentations Teresa Fryberger .ppt file (5.9MB), Director, Environmental Remediation Sciences Division, Division and Draft Strategic Plan Overview Anna Palmisano .ppt file (16.6MB), Natural and Accelerated Bioremediation Research Program Update Roland Hirsch .ppt file (740KB), Environmental Management Science Program Bill Rogers .ppt file (10.6MB), Environmental Molecular Sciences

162

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 15, 2001 May 15, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-10: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program May 1, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-11: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program April 23, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-08: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Raver - Covington Line 1 April 13, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-06: Supplement Analysis Vegetation Management of annual weeds on seven acres of Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) owned pastureland at the Walla Walla Substation April 13, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-06: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program March 9, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program March 1, 2001 EIS-0189: Supplement Analysis Tank Waste Remediation System

163

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 25, 2012 April 25, 2012 Department of Energy Announces Intent to Extend Hanford Site Contract RICHLAND, Wash. - The Department of Energy (DOE) plans to extend CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company's contract for environmental cleanup at the Hanford Site by another five years. April 25, 2012 Audit Report: IG-0863 The Department of Energy's $12.2 Billion Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - Quality Assurance Issues - Black Cell Vessels April 24, 2012 Conceptual site model for evaluating soil vapor extraction system performance to determine if the system should be optimized, terminated, or transitioned to another approach. New Approach to Assess Volatile Contamination in Vadose Zone Provides Path Forward for Site Closure RICHLAND, Wash. and LOS ALAMOS, N.M. - Through the Deep Vadose

164

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 30, 2013 July 30, 2013 Matt McCormick, manager of the Richland Operations Office, commends a large group of Hanford workers for the 15-million-ton milestone at a public event at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility. Disposal Facility Reaches 15-Million-Ton Milestone RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) - a massive landfill for low-level radioactive and hazardous waste at the Hanford site - has achieved a major cleanup milestone. July 30, 2013 Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz tours the 200 West Pump and Treat System, which treats chemical and radionuclide contamination in Hanford's groundwater. Pictured, left to right, are Special Assistant to the Secretary Mark Appleton, Bob Popielarczyk of CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company, Special Assistant to the Secretary T.J. Augustine, Secretary Ernest Moniz, EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga and DOE Richland Operations Office Deputy Manager Doug Shoop.

165

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 8, 2012 March 8, 2012 Fifth Chapter of Hanford Story Released to Public: Chapter Dedicated to Potential Future Uses of the Hanford Site RICHLAND, Wash. - The Department of Energy is releasing the fifth chapter of The Hanford Story video series to the public today. March 1, 2012 The new resin was installed at the 100-DX Groundwater Treatment Facility, where it operated over one year without a single resin change. New Resin Improves Efficiency, Reduces Costs in Hanford Site Groundwater Treatment RICHLAND, Wash. - A new resin EM, the Richland Operations Office, and contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company are using in contaminated groundwater treatment is expected to increase efficiency and reduce costs in the operation of pump-and-treat facilities along the Columbia River at

166

Remedial Investigation of Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River - 13603  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In south-central Washington State, the Columbia River flows through the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site. A primary objective of the Hanford Site cleanup mission is protection of the Columbia River, through remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater that resulted from its weapons production mission. Within the Columbia River system, surface water, sediment, and biota samples related to potential Hanford Site hazardous substance releases have been collected since the start of Hanford operations. The impacts from release of Hanford Site radioactive substances to the Columbia River in areas upstream, within, and downstream of the Hanford Site boundary have been previously investigated as mandated by the U.S. Department of Energy requirements under the Atomic Energy Act. The Remedial Investigation Work Plan for Hanford Site Releases to the Columbia River [1] was issued in 2008 to initiate assessment of the impacts under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 [2]. The work plan established a phased approach to characterize contaminants, assess current risks, and determine whether or not there is a need for any cleanup actions. Field investigation activities over a 120-mile stretch of the Columbia River began in October 2008 and were completed in 2010. Sampled media included surface water, pore water, surface and core sediment, island soil, and fish (carp, walleye, whitefish, sucker, small-mouth bass, and sturgeon). Information and sample results from the field investigation were used to characterize current conditions within the Columbia River and assess whether current conditions posed a risk to ecological or human receptors that would merit additional study or response actions under CERCLA. The human health and ecological risk assessments are documented in reports that were published in 2012 [3, 4]. Conclusions from the risk assessment reports are being summarized and integrated with remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) reports developed for upland areas, riparian areas, and groundwater in the Hanford Site River Corridor. The RI/FS reports will evaluate the impacts to soil, groundwater, and river sediments and lead to proposed cleanup actions and records of decision to address releases from the Hanford Site reactor operations. (authors)

Lerch, J.A.; Hulstrom, L.C. [Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Richland, Washington 99354 (United States)] [Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Richland, Washington 99354 (United States); Sands, J.P. [U.S Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)] [U.S Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington 99352 (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA UMore Park Remedial Investigation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA UMore Park Remedial Investigation Frequently Asked Questions What is a remedial investigation? A remedial investigation is a technical assessment that characterizes the soil. A remedial investigation includes the analysis of soil and water samples as well as evaluating existing data

Netoff, Theoden

168

ICDF Complex Remedial Action Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Idaho CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF) Remedial Action Report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 6.2 of the INEEL CERCLA Disposal Facility Remedial Action Work Plan. The agency prefinal inspection of the ICDF Staging, Storage, Sizing, and Treatment Facility (SSSTF) was completed in June of 2005. Accordingly, this report has been developed to describe the construction activities completed at the ICDF along with a description of any modifications to the design originally approved for the facility. In addition, this report provides a summary of the major documents prepared for the design and construction of the ICDF, a discussion of relevant requirements and remedial action objectives, the total costs associated with the development and operation of the facility to date, and identification of necessary changes to the Agency-approved INEEL CERCLA Disposal Facility Remedial Action Work Plan and the ICDF Complex Operations and Maintenance Plan.

W. M. Heileson

2007-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

169

Departmentaf Energy Washington, DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Departmentaf Departmentaf Energy Washington, DC 20585 MAR 4 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR: James H. Chafin, AL Robert Fisher, CH Steven Hamel, OR William Daubenspeck, LL James Hanley, SAN Robert Southworth, RL Harold Dixon, SR \ Lisa Jarr, FETC"/"',,,-' ( ~ ( ) ( I C{ \'"~V FROM: Paul A. Gottlieb'<,. ~ ' \ Assistant General Counsel . for Technology Transfer / and Intellectual Property SUBJECT: U.S. Competitiveness Provision. Except for the cases discussed further below, attached is the U.S. Competitiveness provision which you should begin providing as our initial negotiating position to inventors/contractors requesting identified and, advance patent waivers. Of course, it is not· expected that every inventor/contractor will agree to the exact language in the provision, in which case modifications to the provision can be made. In those cases where substantial changes are contemplated,

170

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 12, 2003 February 12, 2003 EIS-0286: Notice of Intent Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, WA February 12, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-121: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program February 10, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-120: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Benton County, Washington January 31, 2003 EIS-0325: EPA Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement Schultz-Hanford Transmission Line Project January 29, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-119: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Snohomish-Murray No. 1 Transmission Line January 27, 2003 EIS-0285-SA-118: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Holcomb-Naselle 115kV,

171

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-005337: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Redmond, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 24, 2011 Online Registration Dates Set for 2011 Hanford Tours RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will open online registration on March 8 for tours of the Hanford Site and on March 15 for B Reactor-specific tours. February 24, 2011 Praveen Thallapally | photo courtesy of Pacific Northwest National Lab 10 Questions for a Materials Chemist: Praveen Thallapally Dr. Thallapally gave us an inside look at how he's working to advance carbon capture and geothermal technologies, developing a new class of

172

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 16, 2004 January 16, 2004 EIS-0246-SA-37: Supplement Analysis Wildlife Mitigation Program, On the Spokane Indian Reservation, near Wellpinit, Stevens County, Washington November 10, 2003 EIS-0349: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project October 2, 2003 EA-0307-SA-01: Supplement Analysis Colville Resident Trout Hatchery Project Supplement Analysis September 5, 2003 EIS-0349: Draft Environmental Impact Statement BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project July 21, 2003 EIS-0317: Record of Decision Kangley-Echo Lake Transmission Line Project July 14, 2003 EIS-1069-SA-07: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Kilickitat Fisheries Project, Noxious Weed Control at Cle Elum and Jack Creek, Cle Elum Supplementation and Research Facility and Jack Creek

173

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 17, 2001 August 17, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-23: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 17, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-22: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, King and Snohomish Counties, WA, in the Snohomish Region August 14, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-59: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program August 7, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-58: Supplement Anlalysis Watershed Program - Asotin Creek Channel, Floodplain and Riparian Restoration August 2, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-20: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 1, 2001 EIS-0245-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington July 24, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-17: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program

174

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 19, 2013 June 19, 2013 A Hanford site volunteer helps a Boy Scout practice the Pull, Aim, Squeeze, Sweep, or PASS, fire extinguishing technique at the Volpentest HAMMER Training & Education Center in Richland. Local Scouts Train with Hanford Safety Experts - 52 Boy Scouts Earn Merit Badges at the HAMMER Training Facility RICHLAND, Wash. - Hanford site services contractor Mission Support Alliance (MSA) hosted a unique opportunity for 52 local Boy Scouts at the Volpentest HAMMER Training & Education Center during two consecutive weekends recently. June 14, 2013 EA-1562-SA-1: Supplement Analysis Final Environmental Assessment of Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington June 4, 2013

175

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 2, 2004 August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2 BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project Volume 2 August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Figures BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project August 2, 2004 EIS-0349: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendices BP Cherry Point Cogeneration Project June 23, 2004 EIS-0026-SA-02: Supplement Analysis Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Commingled Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant April 7, 2004 EIS-0169-SA-08: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Boone Pond Acclimation Site, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington March 12, 2004 EA-1486: Final Environmental Assessment East and West Diversion Screening Proposal Methow Valley Irrigation District Project

176

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 25, 2010 January 25, 2010 EIS-0391: Updated Notice of Public Hearings Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA January 13, 2010 CX-000471: Categorical Exclusion Determination Limited Prescribed Burning on the Hanford Site During October, November, and December of 2010 to Maintain Critical Fire Breaks CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/13/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 8, 2010 EIS-0391: Notice of Public Hearings Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA January 1, 2010 EIS-0222: Final Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan December 18, 2009 EIS-0391: Notice of Modification of Preferred Alternatives

177

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 14, 2001 December 14, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-35: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program December 3, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-72: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Yakima Basin Side Channels Project, Scatter Creek/Plum Creek Land Acquisition Phase II December 3, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-34: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program November 15, 2001 EIS-0285-SA-32: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Walla Walla County, Washington November 15, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-69: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program October 29, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-71: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Duncan Creek Channel Rehabilitation Project October 23, 2001 EIS-0265-SA-70: Supplement Analysis Watershed Management Program - Yakima Basin Side Channels Project, Scatter

178

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 29, 2006 November 29, 2006 EIS-0183: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Windy Point Wind Energy Project June 26, 2006 EIS-0397: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement Lyle Falls Fishway Project May 1, 2006 EIS-0384: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chief Joseph Hatchery Program March 31, 2006 EA-1547: Finding of No Significant Impact Fast Flux Test Facility Project, Hanford Site March 1, 2006 EA-1547: Final Environmental Assessment Sodium Residual Reaction/Removal and Other Deactivation Work Activities, Fast Flux Test Facility Project, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington February 17, 2006 EIS-0391: Notice to Extend Scoping Period Tank Closure and Waste Management for the Hanford Site, Richland, WA

179

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18, 2011 18, 2011 Hanford to Host ISMS Safety Workshop in Kennewick: Abstracts Due in June for September Event RICHLAND, WASH. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at Hanford will hold its annual DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Champions Workshop on September 12-15, 2011, at the Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick, Wash. May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Final Environmental Assessment Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project, Walla Walla and Columbia Counties, Washington May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Mitigation Acton Plan Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project May 17, 2011 EA-1731: Finding of No Significant Impact Walla Walla-Tucannon River Transmission Line Rebuild Project May 13, 2011 CX-005809: Categorical Exclusion Determination

180

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 13, 2012 July 13, 2012 First of Hanford's Highly Radioactive Sludge Moved Away from River RICHLAND, Wash. - Workers have started moving highly radioactive material, called sludge, awayfrom the Columbia River, marking a significant milestone in the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s cleanup of the Hanford Site in Washington State. July 9, 2012 EA-1912: Draft Environmental Assessment Midway-Benton No. 1 Rebuild Project Benton County, WA July 3, 2012 EIS-0312: Record of Decision (2012) Bonneville Power Administration Administrator's Record of Decision: Columbia Basin Fish Accords Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Kalispel Tribe July 3, 2012 DOE Announces Additional Tour Seats Available: Tours of B Reactor at the Hanford Site Begin and End in Richland, Wash. RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made additional

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 5, 2002 September 5, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-107: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program September 2, 2002 EIS-0169-SA-05: Supplement Analysis Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Cle Elum, Kittitas County, Washington August 30, 2002 EIS-0332: Final Environmental Impact Statement McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project August 29, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-99: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program Final Environmental Impact Statement - Olympia-Grand Coulee No.1 August 22, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-105: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 21, 2002 EIS-0285-SA-104: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program August 1, 2002 EIS-0344: Draft Envrionmental Impact Statement

182

Microsoft Word - washington.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Washington Washington NERC Region(s) ....................................................................................................... WECC Primary Energy Source........................................................................................... Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) ....................................................................... 30,478 10 Electric Utilities ...................................................................................................... 26,498 5 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power ................................ 3,979 26 Net Generation (megawatthours) ........................................................................... 103,472,729 15

183

Biofuels in Oregon and Washington  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PNNL-17351 Biofuels in Oregon and Washington A Business Case Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges Prepared by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory #12;#12;Biofuels in Oregon and Washington, particularly in light of the recent growth experienced by the biofuels industry in the Midwest. Policymakers

184

Washington | Building Energy Codes Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington Washington Last updated on 2013-11-05 Current News The Washington State Building Code Council recently completed deliberations on adoption and amendment of the 2012 codes. This includes adoption of the 2012 IECC with state amendments. The new codes became effective July 1, 2013. Commercial Residential Code Change Current Code State Specific Amendments / Additional State Code Information WA 2012 Nonresidential Codes Approved Compliance Tools Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Tools Approximate Energy Efficiency Equivalent to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Effective Date 07/01/2013 Adoption Date 02/01/2013 Code Enforcement Mandatory DOE Determination ASHRAE 90.1-2007: Yes ASHRAE 90.1-2010: Yes Washington DOE Determination Letter, May 31, 2013 Washington State Certification of Commercial and Residential Building Energy Codes

185

Responsible Party: Jewel Washington Status Indicators  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Human Resources Division 2012 - 2013 Work Plan/Dashboard Areas of Strategic Focus Workforce and develop the relevant metrics for UNM management to make effective human resource decisions. Employment Effectiveness: Foster a culture to enhance workforce effectiveness by building partnerships, competencies

New Mexico, University of

186

FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

7 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National 7 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC,

187

OE/EV-0005/2 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OE/EV-0005/2 OE/EV-0005/2 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Hooker Chemical Company Niagara Falls, New York January 1977 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 DOE/EV-0005/2 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Hooker Chemical Company Niagara Falls, New York January 1977 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Division of Environmental Control Technology Washing-ton, D.C. 20545 Under Contract No. W-7405-ENE-26 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 3783C NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United

188

BP Energy Company (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Company (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name: BP Energy Company Place: Washington References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File220101 EIA Form 861 Data...

189

Washington: Graphene Nanostructures for Lithium Batteries Recieves...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Washington: Graphene Nanostructures for Lithium Batteries Recieves 2012 R&D 100 Award Washington: Graphene Nanostructures for Lithium Batteries Recieves 2012 R&D 100 Award February...

190

Washington -- SEP Data Dashboard | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Data Dashboard Washington -- SEP Data Dashboard The data dashboard for Washington -- SEP, a partner in the Better Buildings Neighborhood Program. bbnpbban0004447pmcdashboardy...

191

Riverland expedited response action proposal  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) recommended that the US Department of Energy (DOE) prepare an expedited response action (ERA) for the Riverland Railroad Car Wash Pit and the 600 Area Army Munitions Burial Site. A non-time-critical ERA proposal includes preparation of an engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) section. The EE/CA is a rapid, focused evaluation of available technologies using specific screening factors to assess feasibility, appropriateness, and cost. The ERA proposal will undergo reviews by Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC), DOE, EPA, Ecology, and the public. Ecology and EPA will issue an Action Agreement Memorandum after resolution of all review comments. The, memorandum will authorize remediation activities. The ERA goal is to reduce the potential for any contaminant migration to the soil column, groundwater, and Columbia River. The ERA may be the final remediation of the 100-IU-1 Operable Unit. A No Action Record of Decision may be issued after cleanup completion.

Not Available

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

192

DOE Awards $3.3 million for Advanced Remediation Technology Contracts |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Awards $3.3 million for Advanced Remediation Technology Awards $3.3 million for Advanced Remediation Technology Contracts DOE Awards $3.3 million for Advanced Remediation Technology Contracts August 3, 2006 - 8:38am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) today awarded 12 contracts totaling $3.3 million to support the development of technologies that have the potential to reduce cleanup costs and increase the safety and efficiency of treating and disposing of radioactive waste. These contracts provide funding to small and large businesses and a university to develop technologies over a six month period. "These awards allow for further development and evaluation of technologies that can lead to breakthroughs in how the Department implements its cleanup

193

DOE Awards $3.3 million for Advanced Remediation Technology Contracts |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

.3 million for Advanced Remediation Technology .3 million for Advanced Remediation Technology Contracts DOE Awards $3.3 million for Advanced Remediation Technology Contracts August 3, 2006 - 8:38am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) today awarded 12 contracts totaling $3.3 million to support the development of technologies that have the potential to reduce cleanup costs and increase the safety and efficiency of treating and disposing of radioactive waste. These contracts provide funding to small and large businesses and a university to develop technologies over a six month period. "These awards allow for further development and evaluation of technologies that can lead to breakthroughs in how the Department implements its cleanup mission across the complex," said Assistant Secretary of Environmental

194

Remedial design work plan for Lower East Fork Poplar Creek Operable Unit, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Remedial Design Work Plan (RDWP) for Lower East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC) Operable Unit (OU) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This remedial action fits into the overall Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) cleanup strategy by addressing contaminated floodplain soil. The objective of this remedial action is to minimize the risk to human health and the environment from contaminated soil in the Lower EFPC floodplain pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) (1992). In accordance with the FFA, a remedial investigation (RI) (DOE 1994a) and a feasibility study (DOE 1994b) were conducted to assess contamination of the Lower EFPC and propose remediation alternatives. The remedial investigation determined that the principal contaminant is mercury, which originated from releases during Y-12 Plant operations, primarily between 1953 and 1963. The recommended alternative by the feasibility study was to excavate and dispose of floodplain soils contaminated with mercury above the remedial goal option. Following the remedial investigation/feasibility study, and also in accordance with the FFA, a proposed plan was prepared to more fully describe the proposed remedy.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

Advice and Responses - Hanford Site  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

- 201 Advice Letters Response to Advice Description Date Adopted 281 In-trench Macroencapsulation of Waste at ERDF November 6, 2014 280 TPA-280 Remedial InvestigationFeasibility...

196

Transformative Wave Technologies Kent, Washington  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Transformative Wave Technologies Kent, Washington www.transformativewave.com #12;#12;North America are shifted to off peak times #12;#12;Transformative Wave Technologies www.transformativewave.com #12

California at Davis, University of

197

Recovery Act State Memos Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington For questions about DOE's Recovery Act activities, please contact the DOE Recovery Act Clearinghouse: 1-888-DOE-RCVY (888-363-7289), Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov/contactUs.htm. All numbers and projects listed as of June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACT SNAPSHOT................................................................................... 1 FUNDING ALLOCATION TABLE.............................................................................. 2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY ............................................................................................... 3 RENEWABLE ENERGY ............................................................................................. 6

198

Surfactants for ground water remediation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Ground water contamination is a most intractable form of pollution. Spilled solvent or fuel liquids are trapped below the water table by colloidal forces. Surfactants may be used to dramatically improve contaminated aquifer remediation rates. Principal remediation mechanisms include micellar solubilization and mobilization of the trapped liquids by lowering of the oil/water interfacial tension. Surfactant selection is a key to the successful design of a remediation effort, and involves consideration of factors including Krafft Point, surfactant adsorption onto the aquifer solids, and the phase behavior of the oil/water/surfactant system. Successful field demonstrations have occurred in recent months and the technology is moving rapidly toward commercialization. Critical research issues remain including acceptable clean-up levels, surfactant/contaminant in situ biodegradation rates, and surfactant decontamination and reuse.

Jeffrey H. Harwell; David A. Sabatini; R.C. Knox

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

Remediation by inspiration : artist-driven models for environmental clean-up  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

While often seen as utilitarian and technical, environmental remediation efforts have significant cultural, social and physical impacts. Accordingly, they demand responses that utilize a multi-disciplinary approach to the ...

Fain, Jessica (Jessica Elizabeth)

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Remedial investigation report for J-Field, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. Volume 1: Remedial investigation results  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results of the remedial investigation (RI) conducted at J-Field in the Edgewood Area of Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), a U.S. Army installation located in Harford County, Maryland. Since 1917, activities in the Edgewood Area have included the development, manufacture, and testing of chemical agents and munitions and the subsequent destruction of these materials at J-Field by open burning and open detonation. These activities have raised concerns about environmental contamination at J-Field. This RI was conducted by the Environmental Conservation and Restoration Division, Directorate of Safety, Health and Environmental Division of APG, pursuant to requirements outlined under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (CERCLA). The RI was accomplished according to the procedures developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 1988). The RI provides a comprehensive evaluation of the site conditions, nature of contaminants present, extent of contamination, potential release mechanisms and migration pathways, affected populations, and risks to human health and the environment. This information will be used as the basis for the design and implementation of remedial actions to be performed during the remedial action phase, which will follow the feasibility study (FS) for J-Field.

Yuen, C. R.; Martino, L. E.; Biang, R. P.; Chang, Y. S.; Dolak, D.; Van Lonkhuyzen, R. A.; Patton, T. L.; Prasad, S.; Quinn, J.; Rosenblatt, D. H.; Vercellone, J.; Wang, Y. Y.

2000-03-14T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Fiscal Year 2010 Program of the U.S. DOE Office of Groundwater and Soil Remediation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The mission of the Office of Groundwater and Soil Remediation (EM-32) is to perform assessments, establish technical criteria and promote cross-site integration. The Office provides guidance for the development and implementation of plans for remediation of groundwater and is responsible for development of technologies needed to reduce risk from groundwater contamination. It is also responsible for providing technical direction and/or assistance to sites in resolving difficult technical groundwater and soil remediation problems. This paper discusses the activities funded by EM-32 for FY-2010.

Chamberlain, G. M.; Skubal, Karen L.; Wellman, Dawn M.

2011-03-07T23:59:59.000Z

202

Table EA-1. Stream-water dissolved Mn at basin outflow of perennial stream at Inspiration Dam illustrating decreases in dissolved Mn in response to remediation efforts. Dissolved Mn in  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-Jul-98 2.8E-04 24-Nov-98 3.6E-04 11-Feb-99 1.2E-05 Remedial ground-water pumping begins 24-Mar-99 8.9E) and ground-water (GW) chemistry data for streambed sediment sampling sites. Dissolved concentrations in moleTable EA-1. Stream-water dissolved Mn at basin outflow of perennial stream at Inspiration Dam

203

Response  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Data Base for 1992: U.S. Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Inventories, Projections and Characteristics, publi. DOE/RW-0006, Rev. 8 (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 1989), p. 113. 2. T. Taylor, quoted by S. Salesky...

Philip H. Abelson

1995-09-22T23:59:59.000Z

204

North Slope (Wahluke Slope) expedited response action cleanup plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this action is to mitigate any threat to public health and the environment from hazards on the North Slope and meet the expedited response action (ERA) objective of cleanup to a degree requiring no further action. The ERA may be the final remediation of the 100-I-3 Operable Unit. A No Action record of decision (ROD) may be issued after remediation completion. The US Department of Energy (DOE) currently owns or administers approximately 140 mi{sup 2} (about 90,000 acres) of land north and east of the Columbia River (referred to as the North Slope) that is part of the Hanford Site. The North Slope, also commonly known as the Wahluke Slope, was not used for plutonium production or support facilities; it was used for military air defense of the Hanford Site and vicinity. The North Slope contained seven antiaircraft gun emplacements and three Nike-Ajax missile positions. These military positions were vacated in 1960--1961 as the defense requirements at Hanford changed. They were demolished in 1974. Prior to government control in 1943, the North Slope was homesteaded. Since the initiation of this ERA in the summer of 1992, DOE signed the modified Hanford Federal Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) with the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in which a milestone was set to complete remediation activities and a draft closeout report by October 1994. Remediation activities will make the North Slope area available for future non-DOE uses. Thirty-nine sites have undergone limited characterization to determine if significant environmental hazards exist. This plan documents the results of that characterization and evaluates the potential remediation alternatives.

Not Available

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Bainbridge Bainbridge Island, Washington to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Bainbridge Island, Washington on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO

206

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Better Buildings Partners Better Buildings Partners Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Washington - SEP on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA

207

Streamline simulation of Surfactant Enhanced Aquifer Remediation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nonaqueous Phase Liquids (NAPLS) are a recognized source of groundwater contamination. Surfactant Enhanced Aquifer Remediation (SEAR) shows promise in increasing the efficiency and effectiveness over traditional "pump and treat" NAPL remediation...

Tunison, Douglas Irvin

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Use of Risk Analysis on Remedial Alternatives  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Quantitative risk assessment (RA) is a tool used in determining a remedial alternatives effectiveness of reducing public health ... to occur at a site. Under the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) ...

Teresa A. Schuller; Denice H. Wardrop

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

Assessment of Remedial Actions for Contaminated Sites  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

During the investigation in the field of remedial actions on contaminated land, an appropriate concept ... site, an evaluation of the existing alternative remedial techniques is necessary. The comparative evaluat...

Th. Neteler; H. L. Jessberger

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

Toxic Remediation System And Method  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

What is disclosed is a novel toxic waste remediation system designed to provide on-site destruction of a wide variety of hazardous organic volatile hydrocarbons, including but not limited to halogenated and aromatic hydrocarbons in the vapor phase. This invention utilizes a detoxification plenum and radiation treatment which transforms hazardous organic compounds into non-hazardous substances.

Matthews, Stephen M. (Alameda County, CA); Schonberg, Russell G. (Santa Clara County, CA); Fadness, David R. (Santa Clara County, CA)

1996-07-23T23:59:59.000Z

211

Residential radon remediation: performance over 17 years  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......covering about 1000 m2. Water drains into the basin...sub-slab ventilation remediation system installed, i...sub-slab ventilation remediation (Bq mSE). Measured...concentration with height above ground level. For example...had a sub-slab radon remediation system installed that......

Naomi H. Harley; Passaporn Chittaporn; Anthony Marsicano

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

Bargaining over Remedies in Merger Bruce Lyons  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

on the internationally standard 2-phase investigation structure and remedy negotiations of the form practiced by the EC jurisdictions, remedies can be agreed in either phase of investigation. In particular, both the EU and US merger regulations allow remedies to be agreed in either phase of the investigation. Either de jure (as in the EU

Feigon, Brooke

213

Washington Biodiesel | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Logo: Washington Biodiesel Name Washington Biodiesel Address 3401 Fremont Avenue N. Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98103 Sector Biofuels Product Aims to grow biodiesel feedstock Website http://wabiodiesel.com/ Coordinates 47.6495905°, -122.3497956° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6495905,"lon":-122.3497956,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

214

Summary Protocol: Identification, Characterization, Designation, Remedial  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary Protocol: Identification, Characterization, Designation, Summary Protocol: Identification, Characterization, Designation, Remedial Action, Certification Summary Protocol: Identification, Characterization, Designation, Remedial Action, Certification Summary Protocol: Identification, Characterization, Designation, Remedial Action, Certification (January 1986) Summary Protocol: Identification, Characterization, Designation, Remedial Action, Certification (January 1986) More Documents & Publications Supplement No. 1 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Designation/Elimination Protocol Pre-MARSSIM Surveys in a MARSSIM World: Demonstrating How Pre-MARSSIM Radiological Data Demonstrate Protectiveness at Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Sites U.S. Department of Energy Guidelines for Residual Radioactive Material at

215

Soil & Groundwater Remediation | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Soil & Groundwater Soil & Groundwater Remediation Soil & Groundwater Remediation Soil & Groundwater Remediation The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) manages the largest groundwater and soil remediation effort in the world. The inventory at the DOE sites includes 6.5 trillion liters of contaminated groundwater, an amount equal to about four times the daily U.S. water consumption, and 40 million cubic meters of soil and debris contaminated with radionuclides, metals, and organics. The Office of Groundwater and Soil Remediation is working with DOE site managers around the country regarding specific technical issues. At the large sites such as Hanford, Savannah River, and Oak Ridge, the Office of Groundwater and Soil Remediation has conducted research and demonstration projects to test new technologies and remediation

216

Why sequence Bacteria from Lake Washington?  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

bacteria from Lake Washington? bacteria from Lake Washington? Previous collaborations between the University of Washington team and the DOE JGI involving both single genome and metagenomic sequencing have greatly enhanced the community's ability to explore the diversity of bacteria functionally active in metabolism of single carbon compounds, known as methylotrophs, isolated from Lake Washington (Seattle, Washington) sediment. Sequencing genomes of 50 methylotroph isolates from the Lake Washington will further enhance the methylotroph community knowledge database providing a much higher level of resolution of global (meta)transcriptomic and (meta)proteomic analyses, as well as species interaction studies, informing a better understanding of biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen.

217

Type B Accident Investigation At Washington Closure Hanford,...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Investigation At Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Employee Fall Injury on July 1, 2009, At The 336 Building, Hanford Site, Washington Type B Accident Investigation At Washington...

218

Washington State Department of Transportation | Open Energy Informatio...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington State Department of Transportation Abbreviation: WDOT Place: Olympia, Washington Phone Number: 360-705-7000 Website: http:www.wsdot.wa.gov References: Washington...

219

Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program - 12189  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) was established in 1974 to address residual radiological contamination at sites where work was performed for the Manhattan Engineer District and U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Initially, FUSRAP activities began with a records search for sites that had the potential to contain residual radiological contamination; 46 sites were identified that were eligible for and required remediation. Remedial action began in 1979. In 1997, Congress assigned responsibility for the remediation of FUSRAP sites to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). DOE retains responsibility for determining if sites are eligible for FUSRAP remediation and for providing long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) of remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE LTS&M activities are designed to ensure that FUSRAP sites remain protective of human health and the environment and to preserve knowledge regarding FUSRAP sites. Additional elements include eligibility determinations, transition of remediated sites from USACE to DOE, LTS&M operations such as inspections and institutional controls management, stakeholder support, preservation of records, and real property and reuse. DOE maintains close coordination with USACE and regulators to ensure there is no loss of protectiveness when sites transition to DOE for LTS&M.

Clayton, Christopher [U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Washington, DC; Kothari, Vijendra [U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Morgantown, West Virginia; Starr, Ken [U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Westminster, Colorado; Gillespie, Joey [S.M. Stoller Corporation, Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Grand Junction, Colorado; Widdop, Michael [S.M. Stoller Corporation, Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Grand Junction, Colorado; none,

2012-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

220

Evaluation of Final Radiological Conditions at Areas of the Niagara Falls Storage Site Remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program -12184  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) methods and protocols allow evaluation of remediation and final site conditions to determine if remediated sites remain protective. Two case studies are presented that involve the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) and associated vicinity properties (VPs), which are being remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). These properties are a part of the former Lake Ontario Ordnance Works (LOOW). In response to stakeholders concerns about whether certain remediated NFSS VPs were putting them at risk, DOE met with stakeholders and agreed to evaluate protectiveness. Documentation in the DOE records collection adequately described assessed and final radiological conditions at the completed VPs. All FUSRAP wastes at the completed sites were cleaned up to meet DOE guidelines for unrestricted use. DOE compiled the results of the investigation in a report that was released for public comment. In conducting the review of site conditions, DOE found that stakeholders were also concerned about waste from the Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) that was handled at LOOW. DOE agreed to determine if SPRU waste remained at that needed to be remediated. DOE reviewed records of waste characterization, historical handling locations and methods, and assessment and remediation data. DOE concluded that the SPRU waste was remediated on the LOOW to levels that pose no unacceptable risk and allow unrestricted use and unlimited exposure. This work confirms the following points as tenets of an effective long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) program: ? Stakeholder interaction must be open and transparent, and DOE must respond promptly to stakeholder concerns. ? DOE, as the long-term custodian, must collect and preserve site records in order to demonstrate that remediated sites pose no unacceptable risk. ? DOE must continue to maintain constructive relationships with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and state and federal regulators.

Clayton, Christopher [U.S Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Washington, DC; Kothari, Vijendra [U.S Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Morgantown, West Virginia; Starr, Ken [U.S Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Westminster, Colorado; Widdop, Michael; Gillespie, Joey [SM Stoller Corporation, Grand Junction, Colorado

2012-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

A comparison of the RCRA Corrective Action and CERCLA Remedial Action Processes  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides a comprehensive side-by-side comparison of the RCRA corrective action and the CERCLA remedial action processes. On the even-numbered pages a discussion of the RCRA corrective action process is presented and on the odd-numbered pages a comparative discussion of the CERCLA remedial action process can be found. Because the two programs have a difference structure, there is not always a direct correlation between the two throughout the document. This document serves as an informative reference for Departmental and contractor personnel responsible for oversight or implementation of RCRA corrective action and CERCLA remedial action activities at DOE environmental restoration sites.

Not Available

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

222

A large scale environmental assessment: The Clinch River Remedial Investigation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The USEPA identified the Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) in east Tennessee as a Superfund National Priorities List site in 1989. Facilities at the ORR have released a variety of radiological, organic, and inorganic contaminants to the local aquatic environment as a result of nuclear weapons production, uranium enrichment, and energy research and development activities from the mid 1940s to the present. The Clinch River Remedial Investigation (CRRI) was initiated to meet the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) requirements to determine the nature and extent of hazardous releases to the aquatic environment. Phase 1 of the CRRI consisted of sampling and analysis of selected sites representing differing levels of contamination to determine the range of contaminant concentrations present in off-site water, sediment, and fish. Sampling activities in support of Phase 2 of the remedial investigation were designed to assist in defining the nature and extent of the contaminants of concern in sediment, water and biota, and to provide information for assessing the potential risks to human health and the environment associated with those contaminants. A concurrent study evaluated potential remedial alternatives and identified effective and acceptable corrective measures. An overview of the CRRI, including a history of the facilities and their contaminant releases, and the regulatory context in which the remedial investigation occurred is presented.

LeHew, R.; Harris, R. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

223

EIS-0456: Cushman Hydroelectric Project, Tacoma, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS is for the design and construction of certain components of the Cushman Hydroelectric Project in Mason County, Washington.

224

Secretary Moniz's Remarks at the Washington Auto Show-- As Delivered  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Secretary Moniz's remarks, as delivered, at the 2015 Washington Auto Show in Washington, D.C. on January 22, 2015.

225

Summary - Mitigation and Remediation of Mercury Contamination...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

and surface water Hg remediation strategy for adequacy in reducing Hg levels in the fish and to indentify opportunities to achieve cost and technical improvements andor to...

226

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) Expanded Staff Meeting  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Savannah River Remediation Delivering the Mission Dave Olson President and Project Manager January 27, 2012 SRS Executive Management Community Discussion 2 * Liquid Waste Funding...

227

Recommendation 192: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ORSSAB Recommendations and Comments on the Draft 2010 Remediation Effectiveness Report for the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation.

228

Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington River Protection Solutions Washington River Protection Solutions - September 2010 Independent Activity Report, Washington River Protection Solutions - September 2010 September 2010 Participation in the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Integrated Safety Management System Annual Review The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), participated in the review of the Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC Integrated Safety Management System Annual Review for 2010. The review was conducted during the period of August 23 to September 2, 2010, and focused on six functional areas: corrective action management, work planning and control, radiological protection, environmental protection, emergency preparedness, and

229

Results of the Washington Passive Solar Design/Build Competition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In an effort to encourage the design, construction, and marketing of moderately priced passive solar homes in Washington state, the Western Solar Utilization Network (Western SUN) recently sponsored the Washington Passive Solar Design/Build Competition. The competition drew an overwhelming response from designers and builders throughout Washington. Thermal performance of the designs was evaluated by a technical review committee, and final selections were made by the Competition Jury in accordance with the following criteria: perceived market acceptance, thermal performance, cost effectiveness, simplicity of design and operation, and completeness of the passive concept. Design contract awards totaling $50,000 were made available to winners in four categories, including single and multi-family, new and remodeled residences. In order to receive the award in its entirety, winning design/build teams are required to construct their design by April, 1983. As a result of the competition, a great deal was learned about the attitudes and knowledge of professionals and the general public regarding the use of solar energy in Washington state. Among the points that will be highlighted in this paper are the following: (1) a design/build competition is an effective vehicle for promoting solar energy among professionals in the housing community as well as the general public; (2) passive solar techniques can contribute significantly to the heating and cooling needs of residential housing throughout the state of Washington; (3) there is a great deal of interest and talent among the designers and builders of solar residences in Washington; and (4) follow-up activities, including the promotion of winning designs, the systematic collection of performance data, and identification of the major obstacles confronting designers and builders of solar homes, are critical to the success of the program in achieving both its short-term and long-term goals.

Nylen, N.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Washington. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 22, 2013 CX-010734: Categorical Exclusion Determination Covington District Culvert Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration November 19, 2013 CX-010735: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grand Coulee-Bell No.5 Dead End Insulator Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/19/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 24, 2013 CX-011171: Categorical Exclusion Determination Longview and Tillamook Substation Communication Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 09/24/2013

231

Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Seattle, Seattle, Washington to someone by E-mail Share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Facebook Tweet about Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Twitter Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Google Bookmark Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Delicious Rank Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on Digg Find More places to share Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: Seattle, Washington on AddThis.com... Better Buildings Residential Network Progress Stories Interviews Videos Events Quick Links to Partner Information AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT FL | GA | IL | IN | LA ME | MD | MA | MI | MO NE | NV | NH | NJ | NY NC | OH | OR | PA | SC TN | TX | VT | VI | VA

232

DOE Cites CH2M-Washington Group Idaho for Price-Anderson Violations |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

M-Washington Group Idaho for Price-Anderson Violations M-Washington Group Idaho for Price-Anderson Violations DOE Cites CH2M-Washington Group Idaho for Price-Anderson Violations June 14, 2007 - 1:40pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today notified CH2M-Washington Group Idaho (CWI) that it will fine the company $55,000 for violations of the Department's nuclear safety requirements. CWI is the prime contractor responsible for managing the Idaho Cleanup Project at the Idaho National Laboratory site. The Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV) cites violations associated with radiation safety and quality improvement deficiencies identified during a DOE Idaho Operations Office May 2006 assessment of radioactive waste processing activities at the Accelerated Retrieval Project (ARP). The

233

DOE/EV-0005/10 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

0 0 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Former Horizons Inc., Metal Handling Facility, Cleveland, Ohio February 1979 - Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology DOE/EV-0005/10 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Former Horizons Inc., Metal Handling Facility, Cleveland, Ohii February 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 Under Contract No. W-7405-ENG-26 By the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Available from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS)

234

DOE/EV-0005/19 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

9 9 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Building Site 421, United States Watertown Arsenel, Watertown, MA February 1980 . Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology ~--.. _..-- DOE/EV-0005/19 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiologidal Survey of the Building Site 421, United States Watertown Arsenel, Watertown, MA February 1980 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 by Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois 60439 Under Contract No. W-31-1 09-ENG-38 -- _.. .-___

235

Z-LJQ- Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

lOE/EV-0005/9 lOE/EV-0005/9 Z-LJQ- Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiologicd Survey of the Former GSA 39th Street Warehouse 1716 Pershing Road, Chicago, Illinois January 1979 . Final Report Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology ' !. & .~~"I__ _ -..- ~-. _...-. DO E/EV-0005/g UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiologicd Survey of the Former GSA 39th Street Warehouse 1716 Pershing Road, Chicago, Illinois January 1979 Final Report Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmen\ Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 Under Contract W-31 -109-ENG-38 By the Argonne National Laboratory

236

DOE/EV-0005/16 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

6 6 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radic&@cal Survey of the St. Louis Airport Storage Site, St. Louis, Missouri September 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology .__ -. __ ..- -- DOE/EV-0005/16 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the St. Louis Airport Storage Site, St. Louis, Missouri September 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Under Contract No. W-7405-ENG-26 .--__ _ .- _--- _ ~- Available from:

237

DOE/EV-0005/11 Formerly Utilized M.ED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

1 1 Formerly Utilized M.ED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radidogical Survey of the Seneca Army Depot Romulus, New York February 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology : E 1 bOE/EV-0005/11 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MEDIAEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radidogical Survey of the Seneca Army Depot Romulus, New York February 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 Under Contract No. W-7405-ENG-26 By the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Available from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) U.S. Department of Comrqerce

238

DOE/EV-0005/15 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

5 5 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Bayo Canyon, Los Alamos, New Mexico June 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology DOE/EV-0005/15 UC-71 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Bayo Canyon, Los Alamos, New Mexico June 1979 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Division of Environmental Control Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Under Contract No. W-7405-ENG-36 Available from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161

239

NE-24 Unlverslty of Chicayo Remedial Action Plan  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

(YJ 4 tlsj .?I2 (YJ 4 tlsj .?I2 416 17 1983 NE-24 Unlverslty of Chicayo Remedial Action Plan 22&d 7 IA +-- E. I.. Keller, Director Technical Services Division Oak Ridge Operations Ufflce In response to your memorandum dated July 29, 1983, the Field Task Proposal/Agreement (FTP/A) received frw Aryonne National Laboratory (ANL) appears to be satisfactory, and this office concurs in the use of ANL to provide the decontamination effort as noted in the FTP/A. The final decontaminatton report should Include the data needed for certiff- cation of the cleanup and any contamination left In place, e.g., sewer lines should be so documented in the permanent records of the University as well as the certification documents and reports. The remedial action to be conducted appears to be clearly InsIgnifIcant from an environmental

240

Oak Ridge Operations Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

IC77GLg /'-Oi. SEP 20 1982 IC77GLg /'-Oi. SEP 20 1982 10-05-04B-001 Deportment of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-AC05-810R20722 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES BAYO CANYON SITE, LOS ALAMOS, NEW MEXICO SEPTEMBER 1982 Bechtel Job 14501 Bechtel National, Inc. Nuclear Fuel Operations LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Consideration of Reliability in System Design for Ground Water Remediation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A remedial action design system is described that may be used to evaluate candidate remediation systems and select the preferred alternative under conditions of uncertainty. The remedial action design method i...

W. Woldt; I. Bogardi; L. Duckstein

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Groundwater Remediation Strategy Using Global Optimization Algorithms  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. DOI: 10.1061/ ASCE 0733-9496 2002 128:6 431 CE Database keywords: Ground water; Remedial action; Algorithms; Ground-water management. Introduction The contamination of groundwater is a widespread problemGroundwater Remediation Strategy Using Global Optimization Algorithms Shreedhar Maskey1 ; Andreja

Neumaier, Arnold

243

Remediation of the Maxey Flats Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes issues associated with remedial action of Maxey Flats, a low-level radioactive waste disposal site from 1963-1977, located in Fleming County, Kentucky. Present remedial action alternatives being considered are discussed along with emergency plans, ground water monitoring plans, and budgets.

Not Available

1990-01-12T23:59:59.000Z

244

Washington's 5th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Contents Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 5th congressional district 2 Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 5th congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district 4 Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 5th congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 5th congressional district Avista Utilities Smart Grid Project Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 5th congressional district Washington State University Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 5th congressional district Itron ReliOn Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 5th congressional district Kettle Falls Biomass Facility

245

Washington,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DC 20585 December 20, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT FROM: William S. Maharay Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act" Audit Report No.: OAS-L-06-04 We reviewed selected aspects of the Department.of Energy's (Department) implementation of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) of 1982. FMFIA requires that agencies establish management control and financial systems to provide reasonable assurance that the integrity of Federal programs and operations is protected. Furthermore, it requires that the head of the agency provide an annual assurance statement on whether the agency has met this

246

Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 5, 2011 December 5, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIAL OFFICERS AND HEADS OF FIELD ORGANIZATIONS FROM: SUBJECT: !~::o~~~ral Cou;;(} '/-- Reminder Regarding Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) Planning Summaries Early involvement by senior management in the NEP A planning process is a key component of a successful NEP A compliance program. Thus, Department of Energy (DOE) Order 451.1 B requires that each Secretarial Officer and Head of a Field Organization submit an annual NEP A planning summary to the General Counsel by January 31 of each year and make it available to the public. Preparation of these summaries helps ensure that NEP A activities are aligned with program priorities and that resources are allocated to enable timely completion ofNEPA

247

Agencies plan continued DOE landfill remediation  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Agencies plan continued DOE landfill remediation Agencies plan continued DOE landfill remediation The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Idaho Department of Environmental Quality and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have released a planning document that specifies how DOE will continue to remediate a landfill containing hazardous and transuranic waste at DOE's Idaho Site located in eastern Idaho. The Phase 1 Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan for Operable Unit 7-13/14 document was issued after the September 2008 Record of Decision (ROD) and implements the retrieval of targeted waste at the Subsurface Disposal Area (SDA) within the Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC). The SDA began receiving waste in 1952 and contains radioactive and chemical waste in approximately 35 acres of disposal pits, trenches and soil vaults.

248

Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants Applied Field...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants Applied Field Research Initiative (RoMIC-AFRI) Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants Applied Field Research...

249

Building C-400 Thermal Treatment 90% Remedial Design Report and...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Building C-400 Thermal Treatment 90% Remedial Design Report and Site Investigation Building C-400 Thermal Treatment 90% Remedial Design Report and Site Investigation Full Document...

250

Groundwater remediation technologies for trichloroethylene and technetium-99.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??M. Eng. The Technical Advisory Group (TAG) of the Innovative Treatment Remediation Demonstration Program (ITRD) made technology recommendations after reviewing thirty in situ remediation technologies (more)

Uhl, John Nicholas, 1960-

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

Surfactant-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??Concern over soil and groundwater contamination has created a demand for new and efficient remediation technologies. Surfactant-enhanced electrokinetic remediation is an innovative technique which has (more)

Thomas, Steven P.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

Washington State solar loan assistance  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Qualifying citizens of Washington State can receive passive solar investment subsidies funded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) if their design is certified by a licensed engineer or architect. The pilot program operates through 25 credit unions. It is intended to promote energy conservation and to stimulate construction and small-business employment. Requirements for the space heating system are an area for solar collection, an absorber, storage mass, a method of heat distribution, and a device to regulate heat. The design can be either for new construction or as a retrofit.

Kinnear, N.; James, J.

1984-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

Operable Unit 3-14, Tank Farm Soil and INTEC Groundwater Remedial Design/Remedial Action Scope of Work  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Remedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/RA) Scope of Work pertains to OU 3-14 Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center and the Idaho National Laboratory and identifies the remediation strategy, project scope, schedule, and budget that implement the tank farm soil and groundwater remediation, in accordance with the May 2007 Record of Decision. Specifically, this RD/RA Scope of Work identifies and defines the remedial action approach and the plan for preparing the remedial design documents.

D. E. Shanklin

2007-07-25T23:59:59.000Z

254

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 14, 2012 December 14, 2012 CX-009689: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Disconnection of Utilities CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009672: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Relocation of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012 CX-009671: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Demolition and Disposal of Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 12/14/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 14, 2012

255

Washington/Geothermal | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Washington/Geothermal < Washington Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Print PDF Washington Geothermal General Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Power Projects Under Development in Washington No geothermal projects listed. Add a geothermal project. Operational Geothermal Power Plants in Washington No geothermal power plants listed. Add a geothermal energy generation facility. Geothermal Areas in Washington Mean Capacity (MW) Number of Plants Owners Geothermal Region Baker Hot Spring Geothermal Area 22.7 MW22,700 kW 22,700,000 W 22,700,000,000 mW 0.0227 GW 2.27e-5 TW Cascades Geothermal Region

256

PacifiCorp (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington) Washington) (Redirected from Pacific Power (Washington)) Jump to: navigation, search Name PacifiCorp Place Washington Service Territory Washington Website www.pacificorp.com/index. Green Button Reference Page www.pacificpower.net/abou Green Button Implemented Yes Utility Id 14354 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. PacifiCorp consists of three business units. Pacific Power is a subsidiary of PacifiCorp which delivers electricity to customers in Oregon, Washington and California; it is headquartered in Portland, OR. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.0723/kWh

257

Innovative vitrification for soil remediation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of this DOE demonstration program is to validate the performance and operation of the Vortec Cyclone Melting System (CMS{trademark}) for the processing of LLW contaminated soils found at DOE sites. This DOE vitrification demonstration project has successfully progressed through the first two phases. Phase 1 consisted of pilot scale testing with surrogate wastes and the conceptual design of a process plant operating at a generic DOE site. The objective of Phase 2, which is scheduled to be completed the end of FY 95, is to develop a definitive process plant design for the treatment of wastes at a specific DOE facility. During Phase 2, a site specific design was developed for the processing of LLW soils and muds containing TSCA organics and RCRA metal contaminants. Phase 3 will consist of a full scale demonstration at the DOE gaseous diffusion plant located in Paducah, KY. Several DOE sites were evaluated for potential application of the technology. Paducah was selected for the demonstration program because of their urgent waste remediation needs as well as their strong management and cost sharing financial support for the project. During Phase 2, the basic nitrification process design was modified to meet the specific needs of the new waste streams available at Paducah. The system design developed for Paducah has significantly enhanced the processing capabilities of the Vortec vitrification process. The overall system design now includes the capability to shred entire drums and drum packs containing mud, concrete, plastics and PCB`s as well as bulk waste materials. This enhanced processing capability will substantially expand the total DOE waste remediation applications of the technology.

Jetta, N.W.; Patten, J.S.; Hart, J.G.

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

FUPWG Spring 2010 Providence: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers an update on Washington and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Providence, Rhode Island.

259

Washington TRU Solutions Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Solutions Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name: Washington TRU Solutions, Inc. Place: Carlsbad, New Mexico Zip: 88220 Product: New Mexico-based managing and operating contractor...

260

Bonneville Power Administration, Oregon Energy Northwest, Washington...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Northwest, Washington; Wholesale Electric Primary Credit Analyst: David N Bodek, New York (1) 212-438-7969; david.bodek@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Jeffrey M...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Washington Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Permit Application Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- Permit ApplicationPermit Application: Washington Joint Aquatic...

262

USDA Rural Development Washington State Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is hosting a Washington Rural Development Workshop. Speakers will cover local and regional broadband initiatives program and broadband success stories,...

263

Crews repair transmission lines after Washington wildfire  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Privacy Publications Tribal Affairs Newsroom Search News Articles... Search Crews repair transmission lines after Washington wildfire 662014 12:00 AM Tweet Page Content BPA...

264

Washington: a guide to geothermal energy development  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Washington's geothermal potential is discussed. The following topics are covered: exploration, drilling, utilization, legal and institutional setting, and economic factors of direct use projects. (MHR)

Bloomquist, R.G.; Basescu, N.; Higbee, C.; Justus, D.; Simpson, S.

1980-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

Environmental restoration and remediation technical data management plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The tasks performed in the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) work plan for each Hanford Site operable unit must meet the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement, Ecology et. al 1992). An extensive amount of data will be generated in the evaluation and remediation of hazardous waste sites at the Site. The data must be of sufficient quality, as they will be used to evaluate the need, select the method(s), and support the full remediation of the waste sites as stipulated in the Tri-Party Agreement. In particular, a data management plan (DMP) is to be included in an RI/FS work plan for managing the technical data obtained during the characterization of an operable unit, as well as other data related to the study of the operable unit. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) sites are involved in the operable unit. Thus, the data management activities for the operable unit should be applied consistently to RCRA sites in the operable unit as well. This DMP provides common direction for managing-the environmental technical data of all defined operable units at the Hanford Site during the RI/FS activities. Details specific to an operable unit will be included in the actual work plan of that operable unit.

Key, K.T.; Fox, R.D.

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

Remedial Action Work Plan Amchitka Island Mud Pit Closures  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This remedial action work plan presents the project organization and construction procedures developed for the performance of the remedial actions at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE's) sites on Amchitka Island, Alaska. During the late1960s and early 1970s, the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (the predecessor agency to DOE) used Amchitka Island as a site for underground nuclear tests. A total of nine sites on the Island were considered for nuclear testing; however, tests were only conducted at three sites (i.e., Long Shot in 1965, Milrow in 1969, and Cannikin in 1971). In addition to these three sites, large diameter emplacement holes were drilled in two other locations (Sites D and F) and an exploratory hole was in a third location (Site E). It was estimated that approximately 195 acres were disturbed by drilling or preparation for drilling in conjunction with these activities. The disturbed areas include access roads, spoil-disposal areas, mud pits which have impacted the environment, and an underground storage tank at the hot mix plant which was used to support asphalt-paving operations on the island. The remedial action objective for Amchitka Island is to eliminate human and ecological exposure to contaminants by capping drilling mud pits, removing the tank contents, and closing the tank in place. The remedial actions will meet State of Alaska regulations, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service refuge management goals, address stakeholder concerns, and address the cultural beliefs and practices of the native people. The U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office will conduct work on Amchitka Island under the authority of the Comprehensive Emergency Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Field activities are scheduled to take place May through September 2001. The results of these activities will be presented in a subsequent Closure Report.

DOE/NV

2001-04-05T23:59:59.000Z

267

Itron (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Itron Itron Address 601 Officers Row Place Vancouver, Washington Zip 98661 Sector Efficiency Product Manufactures/sells advanced meters and data collection systems Website http://www.itron.com/ Coordinates 45.627447°, -122.656794° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":45.627447,"lon":-122.656794,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

268

Industrial & Systems Engineering University of Washington  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Industrial & Systems Engineering University of Washington Linda Ng Boyle, Ph.D. Associate Professor linda@u.washington.edu #12;Agenda · What is Industrial & Systems Engineering? · Where do Industrial Engineers get jobs? · What classes would you take in ISE? · Where do UW graduates with ISE degrees

Anderson, Richard

269

Applied Field Research Initiative Attenuation Based Remedies  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PA00133 - March 2011 PA00133 - March 2011 Applied Field Research Initiative Attenuation Based Remedies in the Subsurface Located at the Savannah River Site in Aiken, South Carolina, the Attenuation-Based Remedies in the Subsurface Applied Field Research Initiative (ABRS AFRI) was established to develop the tools, approaches and technologies that will be required to address the technical challenges associated characteriza- tion, remediation and long-term monitoring of recalcitrant compounds in the subsurface at Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) sites. The ABRS AFRI site provides a unique setting for researchers in both applied and basic science fields. A wealth of subsurface data is available to support research activities and remedial decision making.

270

Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The mission of the Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants Applied Field Research Initiative is to control the flux of contaminants in soil and water environments for the purpose of...

271

Engineered Polymeric Nanoparticles for Soil Remediation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

compds. in soil-water systems in which surfactants play a role in contaminant remediation or facilitated transport. ... (9)?Abdul, A. S.; Ang, C. C. Ground Water 1994, 32, 727. ...

Warapong Tungittiplakorn; Leonard W. Lion; Claude Cohen; Ju-Young Kim

2004-01-28T23:59:59.000Z

272

SITE MAINTENANCE PLAN CSMRI SITE REMEDIATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

...............................................................................................................5 5.2 Ground and Surface Water MonitoringSITE MAINTENANCE PLAN CSMRI SITE REMEDIATION June 29, 2004 Prepared by: Colorado School of Mines .................................................................................................4 5.0 SITE AIR AND WATER MONITORING

273

Avoiding Destructive Remediation at DOE Sites  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Pollutants, Radioactive 0 Water Pollutants, Radioactive...States Government Agencies Water Pollutants, Radioactive...management government agencies ground water policy pollutants pollution...pumping radioactive waste remediation risk assessment soils...

F. W. Whicker; T. G. Hinton; M. M. MacDonell; J. E. Pinder III; L. J. Habegger

2004-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

274

In situ Groundwater Remediation Using Treatment Walls  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Development of treatment wall technology for the clean up of contaminated ground-water resources has expanded in the past few...ex situ and other in situ ground-water remediation approaches is reduced operation a...

Radisav D. Vidic; Frederick G. Pohland

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

Electrolytic remediation of chromated copper arsenate wastes  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

While chromated copper arsenate (CCA) has proven to be exceptionally effective in protecting wood from rot and infestation, its toxic nature has led to the problem of disposal of CCA-treated lumber and remediation of waters ...

Stern, Heather A. G. (Heather Ann Ganung)

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN CSMRI SITE REMEDIATION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Littleton, CO 80127 #12;CSMRI Site Remediation Quality Assurance Project Plan March 30, 2004 SAMPLING Environmental Consultants, Inc. Approved By: Date: Sally Cuffin Project Quality Assurance Manager New Horizons...................................................................................................................................3 2.5 Decision Rules

277

Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth Generating Facility Plymouth, Washington Prepared by: Benton County, Washington Bonneville Power Administration (DOE/EIS 0345) June 2003 Final Environmental Impact Statement Plymouth Generating Facility To: People Interested in the Plymouth Generating Facility Enclosed is the Final EIS for the Plymouth Generating Facility. The Draft EIS was published in August 2002, and comments were received through October 5, 2002. The Final EIS contains revisions to the Draft EIS and our responses to public and agency comments on the Draft EIS. This letter briefly describes the Final EIS, outlines our next steps, and tells how to contact us if you have questions. The Final EIS is abbreviated, consisting of an updated summary and project description

278

Operable Unit 3-13, Group 3, Other Surface Soils Remediation Sets 4-6 (Phase II) Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan provides the framework for defining the remedial design requirements, preparing the design documentation, and defining the remedial actions for Waste Area Group 3, Operable Unit 3-13, Group 3, Other Surface Soils, Remediation Sets 4-6 (Phase II) located at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center at the Idaho National Laboratory. This plan details the design developed to support the remediation and disposal activities selected in the Final Operable Unit 3-13, Record of Decision.

D. E. Shanklin

2006-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

Energy Incentive Programs, Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington Washington Energy Incentive Programs, Washington October 29, 2013 - 1:19pm Addthis Updated January 2013 Washington utilities budgeted over $180 million in 2011 to promote increased energy efficiency in the state, excluding the offerings administered by the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance and Bonneville Power Authority (see below). What public-purpose-funded energy efficiency programs are available in my state? Washington has no public-purpose-funded energy efficiency programs. What utility energy efficiency programs are available to me? Seattle City Light offers a variety of energy efficiency programs to commercial and industrial customers through its Energy Smart Services initiative: Free facility energy assessments are available to medium and large commercial customers in order to manage operating costs and identify energy

280

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 15, 2013 July 15, 2013 CX-010738: Categorical Exclusion Determination 2013 Spacer and Insulator Replacement Program; Third and Fourth Quarter Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/15/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 2, 2013 CX-010588: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chehalis Substation Tree Clearing CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/02/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 1, 2013 CX-010589: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nine Canyon Communication Tower Addition CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 25, 2013 CX-010429: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harbour Pointe Small Generator Integration

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Washington/Transmission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Washington/Transmission < Washington Jump to: navigation, search WashingtonTransmissionHeader.png Roadmap Agency Links Local Regulations State Regulations Summary General Transmission Dashboard Permitting Atlas Compare States Arizona California Colorado Idaho Montana Nevada New Mexico Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Resource Library NEPA Database The electrical grid in Washington is part of the Western Interconnection power grid and the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC). WECC's service territory extends from Canada to Mexico. It includes the provinces of Alberta and British Columbia, the northern portion of Baja California,

282

Adaptive management: a paradigm for remediation of public facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Public facility restoration planning traditionally focused on response to natural disasters and hazardous materials accidental releases. These plans now need to integrate response to terrorist actions. Therefore, plans must address a wide range of potential vulnerabilities. Similar types of broad remediation planning are needed for restoration of waste and hazardous material handling areas and facilities. There are strong similarities in damage results and remediation activities between unintentional and terrorist actions; however, the uncertainties associated with terrorist actions result in a re-evaluation of approaches to planning. Restoration of public facilities following a release of a hazardous material is inherently far more complex than in confined industrial settings and has many unique technical, economic, social, and political challenges. Therefore, they arguably involve a superset of drivers, concerns and public agencies compared to other restoration efforts. This superset of conditions increases complexity of interactions, reduces our knowledge of the initial conditions, and even condenses the timeline for restoration response. Therefore, evaluations of alternative restoration management approaches developed for responding to terrorist actions provide useful knowledge for large, complex waste management projects. Whereas present planning documents have substantial linearity in their organization, the 'adaptive management' paradigm provides a constructive parallel operations paradigm for restoration of facilities that anticipates and plans for uncertainty, multiple/simUltaneous public agency actions, and stakeholder participation. Adaptive management grew out of the need to manage and restore natural resources in highly complex and changing environments with limited knowledge about causal relationships and responses to restoration actions. Similarities between natural resource management and restoration of a facility and surrounding area(s) after a disruptive event suggest numerous advantages over preset linearly-structured plans by incorporating the flexibility and overlap of processes inherent in effective facility restoration. We discuss three restoration case studies (e.g., the Hart Senate Office Building anthrax restoration, Rocky Flats actinide remediation, and hurricane destruction restoration), that implement aspects of adaptive management but not a formal approach. We propose that more formal adoption of adaptive management principles could be a basis for more flexible standards to improve site-specific remediation plans under conditions of high uncertainty.

Janecky, David R [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Whicker, Jeffrey J [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Doerr, Ted B [NON LANL

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Hazardous waste treatment and environmental remediation research  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is currently evaluating hazardous waste treatment and environmental remediation technologies in existence and under development to determine applicability to remediation needs of the DOE facilities under the Albuquerque Operations Office and to determine areas of research need. To assist LANL is this effort, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) conducted an assessment of technologies and monitoring methods that have been demonstrated or are under development. The focus of this assessment is to: (1) identify existing technologies for hazardous waste treatment and environmental remediation of old waste sites; (2) identify technologies under development and the status of the technology; (3) assess new technologies that need development to provide adequate hazardous waste treatment and remedial action technologies for DOD and DOE sites; and (4) identify hazardous waste and remediation problems for environmental research and development. There are currently numerous research and development activities underway nationwide relating to environmental contaminants and the remediation of waste sites. To perform this effort, SAIC evaluated current technologies and monitoring methods development programs in EPA, DOD, and DOE, as these are the primary agencies through which developmental methods are being demonstrated. This report presents this evaluation and provides recommendations as to pertinent research needs or activities to address waste site contamination problems. The review and assessment have been conducted at a programmatic level; site-specific and contaminant-specific evaluations are being performed by LANL staff as a separate, related activity.

Not Available

1989-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

284

Seattle, Washington: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Seattle, Washington: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America Cities, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Seattle, Washington: Solar in Action (Brochure), Solar America...

285

Washington Success Story-A Performance Contracting Program |...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Success Story-A Performance Contracting Program Washington Success Story-A Performance Contracting Program Provides an overview case study of Washington's Performance Contracting...

286

DOE Cites Washington Closure Hanford for Safety Violations |...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

contractor Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) for violations of DOE's worker safety and health program regulations in 2009 at the Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. In a...

287

Washington: RePower's Energy Dashboard Spurs Change on Bainbridge...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

in which we work, shop, and lead our everyday lives. Addthis Related Articles Washington: Sustainability Training for Realtors in High Demand Washington: Community Power Works is...

288

WSDE Report: Wastewater Discharge Permits in Washington State...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wastewater Discharge Permits in Washington State Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Report: WSDE Report: Wastewater Discharge Permits in Washington...

289

Washington's 7th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7th congressional district: Energy Resources 7th congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 7th congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 7th congressional district 3 Registered Policy Organizations in Washington's 7th congressional district 4 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 7th congressional district 5 Registered Financial Organizations in Washington's 7th congressional district Registered Research Institutions in Washington's 7th congressional district ARCH Venture Partners (Washington) Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center

290

Washington's 6th congressional district: Energy Resources | Open...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington's 6th congressional district Clean Tech Trade Alliance Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 6th congressional district Inventure Chemical Technology Structural...

291

In Situ Remediation Integrated Program: Technology summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The In Situ Remediation Integrated Program (ISR IP) was instituted out of recognition that in situ remediation could fulfill three important criteria: significant cost reduction of cleanup by eliminating or minimizing excavation, transportation, and disposal of wastes; reduced health impacts on workers and the public by minimizing exposure to wastes during excavation and processing; and remediation of inaccessible sites, including: deep subsurfaces, in, under, and around buildings. Buried waste, contaminated soils and groundwater, and containerized wastes are all candidates for in situ remediation. Contaminants include radioactive wastes, volatile and non-volatile organics, heavy metals, nitrates, and explosive materials. The ISR IP intends to facilitate development of in situ remediation technologies for hazardous, radioactive, and mixed wastes in soils, groundwater, and storage tanks. Near-term focus is on containment of the wastes, with treatment receiving greater effort in future years. ISR IP is an applied research and development program broadly addressing known DOE environmental restoration needs. Analysis of a sample of 334 representative sites by the Office of Environmental Restoration has shown how many sites are amenable to in situ remediation: containment--243 sites; manipulation--244 sites; bioremediation--154 sites; and physical/chemical methods--236 sites. This needs assessment is focused on near-term restoration problems (FY93--FY99). Many other remediations will be required in the next century. The major focus of the ISR EP is on the long term development of permanent solutions to these problems. Current needs for interim actions to protect human health and the environment are also being addressed.

Not Available

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

Remediation of a uranium-contamination in ground water  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The former production site of NUKEM where nuclear fuel-elements were developed and handled from 1958 to 1988 was situated in the centre of an industrial park for various activities of the chemical and metallurgical industry. The size of the industrially used part is about 300.000 m{sup 2}. Regulatory routine controls showed elevated CHC (Chlorinated Hydro-Carbons) values of the ground water at the beginning of the 1990's in an area which represented about 80.000 m{sup 2} down-gradient of locations where CHC compounds were stored and handled. Further investigations until 1998 proved that former activities on the NUKEM site, like the UF{sub 6} conversion process, were of certain relevance. The fact that several measured values were above the threshold values made the remediation of the ground water mandatory. This was addressed in the permission given by the Ministry for Nuclear Installations and Environment of Hesse according to chap. 7 of the German atomic law in October 2000. Ground water samples taken in an area of about 5.000 m{sup 2} showed elevated values of total Uranium activity up to between 50 and 75 Bq/l in 2002. Furthermore in an area of another 20.000 m{sup 2} the samples were above threshold value. In this paper results of the remediation are presented. The actual alpha-activities of the ground waters of the remediation wells show values of 3 to 9 Bq/l which are dominated by 80 to 90 % U-234 activity. The mass-share of total Uranium for this nuclide amounts to 0,05% on average. The authority responsible for conventional water utilisation defined target values for remediation: 20 {mu}g/l for dissolved Uranium and 10 {mu}g/l for CHC. Both values have not yet been reached for an area of about 10.000 m{sup 2}. The remediation process by extracting water from four remediation wells has proved its efficiency by reduction of the starting concentrations by a factor of 3 to 6. Further pumping will be necessary especially in that area of the site where the contaminations were found later during soil remediation activities. Only two wells have been in operation since July 2002 when the remediation technique was installed and an apparatus for direct gamma-spectroscopic measurement of the accumulated activities on the adsorbers was qualified. Two further remediation wells have been in operation since August 2006, when the installed remediation technique was about to be doubled from a throughput of 5 m{sup 3}/h to 10 m{sup 3}/h. About 20.000 m{sup 3} of ground water have been extracted since from these two wells and the decrease of their Uranium concentrations behaves similar to that of the two other wells being extracted since the beginning of remediation. Both, total Uranium-concentrations and the weight-share of the nuclides U-234, U-235 and U-238 are measured by ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry) besides measurements of Uranium-Alpha-Activities in addition to the measurement of CHC components of which PCE (Per-chlor-Ethene) is dominant in the contaminated area. CHC compounds are measured by GC (Gas Chromatography). Down-gradient naturally attenuated products are detected in various compositions. Overall 183.000 m{sup 3} of ground water have been extracted. Using a pump and treat method 11 kg Uranium have been collected on an ion-exchange material based on cellulose, containing almost 100 MBq U-235 activity, and almost 15 kg of CHC, essentially PCE, were collected on GAC (Granules of Activated Carbon). Less than 3% of the extracted Uranium have passed the adsorber-system of the remediation plant and were adsorbed by the sewage sludge of the industrial site's waste water treatment. The monthly monitoring of 19 monitoring wells shows that an efficient artificial barrier was built up by the water extraction. The Uranium contamination of two ground water plumes has drastically been reduced by the used technique dependent on the amounts of extracted water. The concentration of the CHC contamination has changed depending on the location of temporal pumping. Thereby maximum availability of this contaminan

Woerner, Joerg; Margraf, Sonja; Hackel, Walter [RD Hanau GmbH (Germany)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington: Energy Resources Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"TERRAIN","zoom":6,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"500px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7510741,"lon":-120.7401386,"alt":0,"address":"Washington

294

Results of Remediation and Verification Sampling for the 600-270 Horseshoe Landfill  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results of the 2005 remedial action and verification soil sampling conducted at the 600-270 waste site after removal of soil containing residual concentrations of dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethane and its breakdown products dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethylene and dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethane. The remediation was performed in response to post-closure surface soil sampling performed between 1998 and 2003 that indicated the presence of residual DDT contamination exceeding the Record of Decision for the 1100 Area National Priorities List site cleanup criteria of 1 mg/kg that was established for the original 1994 cleanup activities.

W. S. Thompson

2005-12-14T23:59:59.000Z

295

Tank waste remediation system privatization phase 1 infrastructure project, systems engineering implementation plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Systems Engineering Implementation Plan (SEIP) describes the processes, products, and organizational responsibilities implemented by Project W-519 to further define how the project`s mission, defined initially by the Tank Waste Remediation System Phase 1 Privatization Infrastructure Project W-503 Mission Analysis Report (Hoertkorn 1997), will be accomplished using guidance provided by the Tank Waste Remediation System Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) (Peck 1998). This document describes the implementation plans for moving from a stated mission to an executable cost, schedule, and technical baseline and to help ensure its successful completion of those baselines.

Schaus, P.S.

1998-08-19T23:59:59.000Z

296

Multiscale modeling of surfactant phase behavior in the remediation of DNAPL contamination.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??The brine barrier remediation technique (BBRT) has been proposed as a novel Brine barrier remediation techniques (BBRT) that use surfactants have been proposed for remediating (more)

Fan, Xiangyu.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Remediation of water contamination using catalytic technologies  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Remediation of contaminated ground and underground water is becoming a critical issue in Europe and worldwide. We discuss here the role of catalysis in water remediation, with reference to two specific examples of catalytic water remediation technologies: (i) the elimination of nitrate and pesticides from water contaminated as a result of agricultural practices and (ii) the conversion of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in contaminated underground water. Of particular interest is a technology based on catalytic membranes for remediation of water contaminated by nitrate, which offers various advantages with respect to conventional technologies. Using a Pd-Cu-based catalytic membrane, a reaction temperature below 15C, a mixed 4:1 CO2:H2 feed and controlling bulk solution pH by \\{HCl\\} addition, it is possible to obtain a nitrate conversion higher than 80% even with ammonium ion formation below 0.5ppm, i.e. the maximum concentration allowed to meet the requirements for drinking water quality. In MTBE conversion in contaminated underground water, acid zeolites with suitable pore structures (channel structure and pore openings) such as H-ZSM-5 and H-BEA can be used as catalytic permeable reactive barriers for in situ remediation. These zeolites not only act as adsorbents for both MTBE and its reaction products, but also effectively catalyze the hydrolysis of MTBE to t-butyl alcohol (TBA) and methanol (MeOH) which then can be rapidly biodegraded by indigenous microorganisms.

Gabriele Centi; Siglinda Perathoner

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

Kootenai Electric Cooperative (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Cooperative (Washington) Cooperative (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name Kootenai Electric Cooperative Place Washington Utility Id 10454 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates No Rates Available The following table contains monthly sales and revenue data for Kootenai Electric Cooperative (Washington). Month RES REV (THOUSAND $) RES SALES (MWH) RES CONS COM REV (THOUSAND $) COM SALES (MWH) COM CONS IND_REV (THOUSAND $) IND SALES (MWH) IND CONS OTH REV (THOUSAND $) OTH SALES (MWH) OTH CONS TOT REV (THOUSAND $) TOT SALES (MWH) TOT CONS

299

Good Energies (Washington DC) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Energies (Washington DC) Energies (Washington DC) Name Good Energies (Washington DC) Address 1250 24th St., NW, Suite 250 Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20037 Product Global investor in renewable energy and energy efficiency industries Year founded 2001 Phone number (202) 747-2550 Website http://www.goodenergies.com/ Coordinates 38.90649°, -77.051534° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.90649,"lon":-77.051534,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

300

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 21, 2012 May 21, 2012 CX-008716: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Tacoma Power Chehalis- Covington 230-Kilovolt (kV) Line/Convert Microwave Signals From Analog To Digital CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 05/21/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration May 18, 2012 CX-009096: Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Customs and Border Protection Non-Intrusive Inspection Tests CX(s) Applied: B3.10, B3.11 Date: 05/18/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Pacific Northwest Site Office May 17, 2012 CX-008717: Categorical Exclusion Determination Relocation of Wood Poles on Centralia B Street No. 1 for Proposed Centralia City Light May Street Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 05/17/2012

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 7, 2013 January 7, 2013 CX-009785: Categorical Exclusion Determination Roosevelt Radio Station Emergency Generator Removal and Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration January 3, 2013 CX-010563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest National Laboratory- Non-Wire Methods for Transmission Congestion Management Through Predictive Simulation and Optimization CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/03/2013 Location(s): Washington, North Carolina, Illinois, Oregon Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy December 27, 2012 CX-009699: Categorical Exclusion Determination Continuation of Yakama Nation Sturgeon Management Project CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 12/27/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington

302

Northern Lights, Inc (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lights, Inc (Washington) Lights, Inc (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name Northern Lights, Inc Place Washington Utility Id 13758 References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File2_2010[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.0982/kWh References ↑ "EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File2_2010" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Lights,_Inc_(Washington)&oldid=412730" Categories: EIA Utility Companies and Aliases Utility Companies Organizations Stubs What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version

303

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 4, 2011 April 4, 2011 CX-005572: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Washington-Tribe-Cowlitz Indian Tribe CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/04/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 30, 2011 CX-005577: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provision of Funds to the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation for the Purchase of the Ninemile Creek Property Date: 03/30/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 27, 2011 CX-005474: Categorical Exclusion Determination Charging Stations - Willis D. Tucker Park CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/14/2011 Location(s): Snohomish, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

304

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 7, 2011 July 7, 2011 CX-006111: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-Tribe-Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 07/07/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 7, 2011 CX-006262: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Ferry Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B4.7 Date: 07/07/2011 Location(s): Walla Walla County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 2, 2011 CX-008688: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of equipment at Wahkiakum Public Utility District's Cathlamet Substation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/02/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 30, 2011 CX-008011: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install EMSL Super-Computer Power Infrastructure

305

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 1, 2012 February 1, 2012 CX-007984: Categorical Exclusion Determination Explosives Research Capability Expansion, 300 Area, Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 30, 2012 CX-007955: Categorical Exclusion Determination Exe-Guard (Formerly Whitelist) Antivirus Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.2, B1.7 Date: 01/30/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory January 27, 2012 CX-007880: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evergreen State Solar Partnership CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 13, 2012 CX-007980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington River Protection Solutions LLC - Proposed Actions For Calendar

306

Map Locating Berkeley Lab Washington, DC Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WASHINGTON, DC PROJECTS OFFICE WASHINGTON, DC PROJECTS OFFICE Map LEGEND: A:Berkeley Lab DC Office; PNNL; NREL; ORNL | B: EPA Waterside Mall C: Metrorail Station: Smithsonian | D: Metrorail Station: L'Enfant Plaza Notice: Due to security requirements in the building, all visitors to the Berkeley Lab DC Projects Office must check in at the ground floor entrance. If you do not have a DOE access badge, you will need to obtain a building visitor badge. To expedite this process, visitors are encouraged to RSVP to their meeting host or call (202) 488-2250 ahead of time. Metal detectors and x-ray screening of personal items are required for all visitors and staff entering the building. Directions to the Lab's Washington, DC Projects Office 901 D Street, SW Suite 950 Washington, DC 20024 Phone/Fax: (202) 488-2250

307

2013 Washington Auto Show | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2013 Washington Auto Show 2013 Washington Auto Show 2013 Washington Auto Show Addthis 1 of 10 While at the Washington Auto Show, Energy Secretary Steven Chu visited Nissan to see the 2013 Leaf. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:50 2 of 10 The new Nissan Leaf is being built at the company's Smyrna, Tennessee, Vehicle Assembly Plant -- helping to cut the price of its electric vehicle. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:49 3 of 10 Energy Secretary Steven Chu discusses the features of the 2014 Cadillac ELR -- the luxury car built built on the same powertrain platform as the Chevy Volt. | Photo courtesy of Sarah Gerrity, Energy Department. Date taken: 2013-01-31 13:57 4 of 10 Energy Secretary Steven Chu discusses some of the features of the Chevy

308

Robert Wood, University of Washington many contributors  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Robert Wood, University of Washington many contributors VOCALS Education and Outreach Snider (Wyoming) · Dave Spencer (NCSU) · Cindy Twohy (OSU) · Rob Wood/Chris Bretherton/Rhea George

Wood, Robert

309

Materials System Inventory Management Practices at Washington...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Materials System Inventory Management Practices at Washington River Protection Solutions OAS-M-15-01 January 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of...

310

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ANNUAL EQUIPMENT TESTING AND  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ANNUAL EQUIPMENT TESTING AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY DIVING SAFETY PROGRAM Date Tested Condition when received Intermediate Pressure Inhalation Resistance Exhalation Resistance Tested Make Serial Number Date Tested Results DEPTH GAUGE BUOYANCY COMPENSATOR Make Serial Number Date

Wilcock, William

311

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Washington Closure Hanford,...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Issued to Washington Closure Hanford, LLC related an Employee Fall at the High Bay Testing Facility (336 Building) at the Hanford Site On August 19, 2010, the U.S. Department...

312

University of Washington Montlake Landfill Oversight Committee  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

University of Washington Montlake Landfill Oversight Committee Montlake Landfill Project Guide Department with the review and approval of the Montlake Landfill Oversight Committee. #12;Montlake Landfill ...................................................................................................................................3 Figure 1 ­ Approximate Boundaries of the Montlake Landfill

Wilcock, William

313

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 26, 2010 July 26, 2010 CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Everett CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 26, 2010 CX-003170: Categorical Exclusion Determination Innovative Phase Change Thermal Energy Storage Solution for Baseload Power CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/26/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 22, 2010 CX-003234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition of Vacant House at Bonneville Power Administration's Ross Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/22/2010 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 21, 2010 CX-003236: Categorical Exclusion Determination

314

Washington/Wind Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington/Wind Resources Washington/Wind Resources < Washington Jump to: navigation, search Print PDF Print Full Version WIND ENERGY STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT & OUTREACHSmall Wind Guidebook Home OpenEI Home >> Wind >> Small Wind Guidebook >> Washington Wind Resources WindTurbine-icon.png Small Wind Guidebook * Introduction * First, How Can I Make My Home More Energy Efficient? * Is Wind Energy Practical for Me? * What Size Wind Turbine Do I Need? * What Are the Basic Parts of a Small Wind Electric System? * What Do Wind Systems Cost? * Where Can I Find Installation and Maintenance Support? * How Much Energy Will My System Generate? * Is There Enough Wind on My Site? * How Do I Choose the Best Site for My Wind Turbine? * Can I Connect My System to the Utility Grid?

315

PacifiCorp (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington Washington Service Territory Washington Website www.pacificorp.com/index. Green Button Reference Page www.pacificpower.net/abou Green Button Implemented Yes Utility Id 14354 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. PacifiCorp consists of three business units. Pacific Power is a subsidiary of PacifiCorp which delivers electricity to customers in Oregon, Washington and California; it is headquartered in Portland, OR. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Residential: $0.0723/kWh Commercial: $0.0688/kWh Industrial: $0.0571/kWh The following table contains monthly sales and revenue data for PacifiCorp

316

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 5, 2013 April 5, 2013 CX-010154: Categorical Exclusion Determination Digital Communication System Upgrade Project: 'D' Analog System Retirement and #WC SONET Ring CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/05/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 3, 2013 CX-010155: Categorical Exclusion Determination Augspurger Radio Tower Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 3, 2013 CX-010094: Categorical Exclusion Determination Activity-Specific Categorical Exclusion for Deep Borehole Drilling, Sampling, and Characterization for the Proposed Natural Gas Pipeline from Pasco, Washington to the Hanford Site 200 East Area CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington

317

Recovery Act State Memos Washington, DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Washington, DC Washington, DC For questions about DOE's Recovery Act activities, please contact the DOE Recovery Act Clearinghouse: 1-888-DOE-RCVY (888-363-7289), Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov/contactUs.htm. All numbers and projects listed as of June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACT SNAPSHOT................................................................................... 1 FUNDING ALLOCATION TABLE.............................................................................. 2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY ............................................................................................... 3 RENEWABLE ENERGY ............................................................................................. 5

318

An overview of treatment and characterization technologies for environmental remediation at the Savannah River Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Environmental Restoration Department (ERD) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) has the responsibility to remediate waste sites and groundwater to standards as determined by Federal and State Authorities. This mission requires that certain programmatic interfaces within the ERD, Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC, formerly Savannah River Laboratory (SRL)), the Department of Energy Headquarters (DOE-HQ) Office of Technology Development (OTD), and outside commercial contractors be utilized to ensure cost-effective remediation technologies are utilized. This paper provides a synopsis of a select cross-section of the treatment and characterization technologies currently being pursued by ERD. Environmental Restoration Technology (ERT) Department`s future role in providing the necessary technologies for waste sites and groundwater remediation is also discussed.

Holt, D.L.; Butcher, B.T.

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

An overview of treatment and characterization technologies for environmental remediation at the Savannah River Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Environmental Restoration Department (ERD) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) has the responsibility to remediate waste sites and groundwater to standards as determined by Federal and State Authorities. This mission requires that certain programmatic interfaces within the ERD, Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC, formerly Savannah River Laboratory (SRL)), the Department of Energy Headquarters (DOE-HQ) Office of Technology Development (OTD), and outside commercial contractors be utilized to ensure cost-effective remediation technologies are utilized. This paper provides a synopsis of a select cross-section of the treatment and characterization technologies currently being pursued by ERD. Environmental Restoration Technology (ERT) Department's future role in providing the necessary technologies for waste sites and groundwater remediation is also discussed.

Holt, D.L.; Butcher, B.T.

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Seminar: Washington Update on May 22, 2013.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Energy Matters in Washington State Page 1 Energy Matters  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Energy Matters in Washington State ­ Page 1 Energy Matters in Washington State June 2008 Updated November 2009 Updated and Revised October 2013 Grand Coulee Dam #12;Energy Matters in Washington State ­ Page 2 Copyright © 2013 Washington State University Energy Program. 905 Plum Street SE, P.O. Box 43169

Collins, Gary S.

322

Washington Success StoryA Performance Contracting Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Provides an overview case study of Washington's Performance Contracting Program. Author: Energy Services Coalition

323

How to accelerate the Fernald remediation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Fernald Environmental Management Project is unique among Department of Energy (DOE) sites by virtue of successful efforts by the Fernald Environmental Restoration Management Corporation (FERMCO) and DOE-Fernald Area Office (FN) in securing a stak-eholder-assisted final site closure vision and all Record of Decisions (ROD) or Interim RODs required to set the stage for final remediation. DOE and FERMCO have agreed in principle on a Ten Year Plan which accelerates all activities to remediate the site in approximately half the target schedule. This paper presents the path that led to the current Ten Year Plan, the key elements of the plan and the implementation strategies.

Yates, M.K. [Fernald Environmental Restoration Management Corp., Cincinnati, OH (United States). Fernald Environmental Management Project; Reising, J. [USDOE Cincinnati, OH (United States)

1996-01-10T23:59:59.000Z

324

Limiting factors in ground water remediation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

If one is charged with restoring a contaminated aquifer today, the procedure of pumping contaminated water to the surface for treatment and discharge is most often the state-of-practice technology. The perceived success of pump-and-treat technology can be misleading if the hydrology and contaminant characteristics at the site are not adequately understood. A failure to understand the processes controlling contaminant transport can result in extremely long pumping periods and, consequently, costly and inefficient remediation. Effects of tailing, sorption, and residual immiscible fluids on time required for pump-and-treat remediation of ground water are discussed.

Clinton W. Hall; Jeffrey A. Johnson

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

325

Work plan for the remedial investigation/feasibility study-environmental assessment for the Colonie site, Colonie, New York  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This work plan has been prepared to document the scoping and planning process performed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) to support remedial action activities at the Colonie site. The site is located in eastern New York State in the town of Colonie near the city of Albany. Remedial action of the Colonie site is being planned as part of DOE's Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. The DOE is responsible for controlling the release of all radioactive and chemical contaminants from the site. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) must be prepared to support the decision-making process for evaluating remedial action alternatives. This work plan contains a summary of information known about the site as of January 1988, presents a conceptual site model that identifies potential routes of human exposure to site containments, identifies data gaps, and summarizes the process and proposed studies that will be used to fill the data gaps. In addition, DOE activities must be conducted in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires consideration of the environmental consequences of a proposed action as part of its decision-making process. This work also describes the approach that will be used to evaluate potential remedial action alternatives and includes a description of the organization, project controls, and task schedules that will be employed to fulfill the requirements of both CERCLA and NEPA. 48 refs., 18 figs., 25 tabs.

Not Available

1990-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

Work Plan for the Feasibility Study for Remedial Action at J-Field, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the feasibility study is to gather sufficient information to develop and evaluate alternative remedial actions to address contamination at J-Field in compliance with the NCP, CERCLA, and SARA. This FS Work Plan summarizes existing environmental data for each AOC and outlines the tasks to be performed to evaluate and select remedial technologies. The tasks to be performed will include (1) developing remedial action objectives and identifying response actions to meet these objectives; (2) identifying and screening remedial action technologies on the basis of effectiveness, implementability, and cost; (3) assembling technologies into comprehensive alternatives for J-Field; (4) evaluating, in detail, each alternative against the nine EPA evaluation criteria and comparing the alternatives to identify their respective strengths and weaknesses; and (5) selecting the preferred alternative for each operable unit.

Benioff, P.; Biang, C.; Haffenden, R.; Goyette, M.; Martino, L.; Patton, T.; Yuen, C.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

327

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Washington Points of Washington Points of Contact to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Points of Contact on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Points of Contact The following people or agencies can help you find more information about Washington's clean transportation laws, incentives, and funding

328

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Washington Laws and Washington Laws and Incentives to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives Listed below are incentives, laws, and regulations related to alternative fuels and advanced vehicles for Washington. Your Clean Cities coordinator

329

Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Verification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Verification Sampling Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Verification Sampling Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds. May 2004, Monterey, California. Charles Tabor, Randall Juhlin, Paul Darr, Julian Caballero, Joseph Daniel, David Ingle Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Verification Sampling More Documents & Publications Steam and ET-DSP Combined for DNAPL Remediation: Full-Scale Site Restoration at Young - Rainey STAR Center Project Overview: Successful Field-Scale In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation Successful Field-Scale In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Young - Rainey STAR Center

330

Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Verification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Verification Sampling Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Verification Sampling Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds. May 2004, Monterey, California. Charles Tabor, Randall Juhlin, Paul Darr, Julian Caballero, Joseph Daniel, David Ingle Nonaqueous-Phase Liquid Characterization and Post-Remediation Verification Sampling More Documents & Publications Project Overview: Successful Field-Scale In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation Successful Field-Scale In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Young - Rainey STAR Center Steam and ET-DSP Combined for DNAPL Remediation: Full-Scale Site Restoration at Young - Rainey STAR Center

331

Mitigation and Remediation of Mercury Contamination at the Y...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Mitigation and Remediation of Mercury Contamination at the Y-12 Plant Oak Ridge Mitigation and Remediation of Mercury Contamination at the Y-12 Plant Oak Ridge Full Document and...

332

Hydrocarbon pollution control and remediation of groundwater: a brief review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...oil-contaminated sediments. There are two main remediation techniques: soil washing and bio- remediation. With soil washing, contaminated soil is leached with water containing a surfactant to assist in hydrocarbon removal. In situ washing is undertaken...

L. Clark

333

Remedial Costs for MTBE in Soil and Ground Water  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The contamination of MTBE in ground water has introduced concerns about the increased cost of remediating MTBE/BTEX releases compared to remediating sites with BTEX only contamination. In an attempt to evaluat...

Barbara H. Wilson; John T. Wilson Ph.D.

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Draft Final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study and Proposed Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Draft Final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study and Proposed Plan Colorado School of Mines, Colorado 80021 #12;The S.M. Stoller Corporation Flood Plain Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study ..................................................................................................... 1-8 1.6 Previous Investigations

335

Acoustically enhanced remediation, Phase 2: Technology scaling  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Weiss Associates is conducting the following three phase program investigating the in-situ application of acoustically enhanced remediation (AER) of contaminated unconsolidated soil and ground water under both saturated and unsaturated conditions: Phase I-- laboratory scale parametric investigation; Phase II--technology Scaling; and Phase III--large scale field tests. AER addresses the need for NAPL (either lighter or denser than water: LNAPL or DNAPL, respectively) in high and low permeability sediments, and the remediation of other types of subsurface contaminants (e.g., metals, radionuclides) in low permeability soils. This program has been placed in the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) DNAPL product. Phase I indicated that AER could be used to effectively remediate NAPL in high permeability soil, and that removal of NAPL from low permeability soil could be increased since the water flux through these soils was significantly increased. Phase II, Technology Scaling, the subject of this paper, focused on (1) evaluating the characteristics of an AER field deployment system, (2) developing DNAPL flow and transport performance data under acoustic excitation, (3) predicting the effect of acoustic remediation in three-dimensional unconsolidated hydrogeologic conditions, (4) conducting an engineering analysis of acoustical sources, and (5) identifying candidate field site(s) for large-scale field testing of the technology.

Iovenitti, J.L.; Hill, D.G. [Weiss Associates, Emeryville, CA (United States); Rynne, T.M.; Spadaro, J.F.; Hutchinson, W. [Scientific Applications and Research Associates, Inc., Huntington Beach, CA (United States); Illangasakere, T. [Colorado Univ., Boulder, CO (United States). Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

336

groundwater nitrogen source identification and remediation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

producer profits. This will, in turn, benefit water bodies in the area that receive stream baseflow fromgroundwater nitrogen source identification and remediation The Seymour Aquifer is a shallow aquifer water withdraws are used for irrigation while the cities of Vernon, Burk- burnett and Electra and many

337

Gamma Ray Imaging for Environmental Remediation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This program is the development of germanium strip detectors for environmental remediation. It is a collaboration between the Naval Research Laboratory and Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. The goal is to develop detectors that are simultaneously capable of excellent spectroscopy and imaging of gamma radiation.

B.F. Philips; R.A. Kroeger: J.D. Kurfess: W.N. Johnson; E.A. Wulf; E. I. Novikova

2004-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

338

2010 Raj JainCSE574sWashington University in St. Louis Radio FrequencyRadio Frequency  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Louis RFID ReadersRFID Readers Sends a pulse of radio energy and listens for tags response Readers may24-1 ©2010 Raj JainCSE574sWashington University in St. Louis Radio FrequencyRadio Frequency;24-3 ©2010 Raj JainCSE574sWashington University in St. Louis What is RFID?What is RFID? Radio Frequency

Jain, Raj

339

Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan for Operable Units 6-05 and 10-04, Phase III  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The remedial design/remedial action for Operable Unit 6-05 (Waste Area Group 6) and Operable Unit 10-04 (Waste Area Group 10) - collectively called Operable Unit 10-04 has been divided into four phases. Phase I consists of developing and implementing institutional controls at Operable Unit 10-04 sites and developing and implementing Idaho National Laboratory-wide plans for both institutional controls and ecological monitoring. Phase II will remediate sites contaminated with trinitrotoluene and Royal Demolition Explosive. Phase III will remediate lead contamination at a gun range, and Phase IV will remediate hazards from unexploded ordnance. This Phase III remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan addresses the remediation of lead-contaminated soils found at the Security Training Facility (STF)-02 Gun Range located at the Idaho National Laboratory. Remediation of the STF-02 Gun Range will include excavating contaminated soils; physically separating copper and lead for recycling; returning separated soils below the remediation goal to the site; stabilizing contaminated soils, as required, and disposing of the separated soils that exceed the remediation goal; encapsulating and disposing of creosote-contaminated railroad ties and power poles; removing and disposing of the wooden building and asphalt pads found at the STF-02 Gun Range; sampling and analyzing soil to determine the excavation requirements; and when the remediation goals have been met, backfilling and contouring excavated areas and revegetating the affected area.

R. P. Wells

2006-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

340

Washington State Department of Ecology | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington State Department of Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology Jump to: navigation, search Name Washington State Department of Ecology Place Lacey, Washington State Zip 98503 References Washington State Department of Ecology[1] This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Washington State Department of Ecology is an organization located in Lacey, Washington State . References ↑ "Washington State Department of Ecology" Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Washington_State_Department_of_Ecology&oldid=696505" Categories: Government Agencies Stubs What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Washington's 2nd congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 2nd congressional district 2 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district 3 Energy Generation Facilities in Washington's 2nd congressional district 4 Utility Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 2nd congressional district Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 2nd congressional district Mercurius Biofuels LLC

342

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 22, 2012 June 22, 2012 CX-008692: Categorical Exclusion Determination Amendment Number 2 to the Alcoa Power Sales Agreement CX(s) Applied: A2 Date: 06/22/2012 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 21, 2012 CX-008695: Categorical Exclusion Determination Munro Control Center Expansion CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 06/21/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 20, 2012 CX-008694: Categorical Exclusion Determination Acquisition and Disposition of Property CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Washington, Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 20, 2012 CX-008693: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Structure Replacements on the Chehalis-Centralia No. 2 115 Kilovolt Transmission Line

343

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 21, 2011 September 21, 2011 CX-006842: Categorical Exclusion Determination Removal of the 204-AR Facility Diesel Generator and Associated Underground 550 Gallon Fuel Tank CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 09/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 21, 2011 CX-006842: Categorical Exclusion Determination Removal of the 204-AR Facility Diesel Generator and Associated Underground 550 Gallon Fuel Tank CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 09/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office September 20, 2011 CX-007036: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project - North Service Center CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington

344

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 14, 2011 June 14, 2011 CX-006253: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Ross #1 230-Kilovolt, North Bonneville-Troutdale #2 230-Kilovolt Transmission Line Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 06/14/2011 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 10, 2011 CX-006198: Categorical Exclusion Determination South Tacoma - Frederickson Power Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 06/10/2011 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 9, 2011 CX-006197: Categorical Exclusion Determination Omak Area 3G Radio Site Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/09/2011 Location(s): Okanogan, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration June 8, 2011 CX-006049: Categorical Exclusion Determination

345

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 26, 2010 May 26, 2010 CX-002564: Categorical Exclusion Determination FPE Renewables, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 26, 2010 CX-002557: Categorical Exclusion Determination G.R. Silicate CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/26/2010 Location(s): Hoquiam, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002567: Categorical Exclusion Determination Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc. CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/21/2010 Location(s): Pierce County, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 21, 2010 CX-002563: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clark Public Utilities CX(s) Applied: B5.1

346

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 30, 2009 September 30, 2009 CX-000477: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install a Photovoltaic Power Generation Array and Electric Car Charging Stations, Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/30/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office September 23, 2009 CX-000476: Categorical Exclusion Determination 331 Building Irrigation Upgrades, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 09/23/2009 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office August 19, 2009 CX-000470: Categorical Exclusion Determination Purgewater Storage and Treatment Facility Unit #1 Closure CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 08/19/2009 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland

347

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 25, 2010 August 25, 2010 CX-003610: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ross-Lexington Number 1 Access Road Repair Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Cowlitz County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 25, 2010 CX-003609: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cushman North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 25, 2010 CX-003614: Categorical Exclusion Determination Badger Canyon Substation Radio Communication Tower Project CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.19 Date: 08/25/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration August 24, 2010 CX-003613: Categorical Exclusion Determination

348

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 12, 2011 December 12, 2011 CX-008010: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small-Scale Research and Development Projects Using Nanoscale Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.15 Date: 12/12/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office December 9, 2011 CX-007481: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007480: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007479: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project

349

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 12, 2011 August 12, 2011 CX-006472: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Seattle, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2011 CX-006470: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2011 CX-006468: Categorical Exclusion Determination Testing Subcontractor for Fenestration System Energy Performance Rating Development and Research CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2011 Location(s): Everett, Washington

350

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 3, 2011 March 3, 2011 CX-005410: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Bonneville-Alcoa Number 1 and 2 Transmission Line Corridor CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Clark County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 3, 2011 CX-005409: Categorical Exclusion Determination Olympia-Grand Coulee Number 1 Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 2, 2011 CX-005379: Categorical Exclusion Determination Insulator Replacement in Agricultural Lands Along the Grand Coulee-Bell Number 3/Grand Coulee-Westside No. 1 Double Circuit 230 Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/02/2011 Location(s): Lincoln County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

351

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 19, 2011 January 19, 2011 CX-005033: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oil Cleanup in 100-NR-2 CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 01/19/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 19, 2011 CX-005032: Categorical Exclusion Determination Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility Ventilation System Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/19/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office January 13, 2011 CX-005034: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provide Power to Existing River Discharge and Monitoring System, 331 Facility, Hanford Site CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 01/13/2011 Location(s): Hanford, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland

352

Arch Venture Partners (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Arch Venture Partners (Washington) Arch Venture Partners (Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Name Arch Venture Partners Address 1000 Second Avenue Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98104 Region Pacific Northwest Area Product Venture capital firm investing in alternative energy production Website http://www.archventure.com/ Coordinates 47.6051741°, -122.3351302° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6051741,"lon":-122.3351302,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

353

ARCH Venture Partners (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington) Washington) Jump to: navigation, search Logo: ARCH Venture Partners Name ARCH Venture Partners Address 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3700 Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98104 Region Pacific Northwest Area Coordinates 47.605526°, -122.334716° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.605526,"lon":-122.334716,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

354

The George Washington University | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

The George Washington University The George Washington University Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20052 Coordinates 38.8991756°, -77.0470916° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.8991756,"lon":-77.0470916,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

355

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 5, 2010 October 5, 2010 CX-004255: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Spacer Dampers Along the Chief Joseph PH-Chief Joseph Number 6 500-Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 10/05/2010 Location(s): Douglas County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration October 4, 2010 CX-004076: Categorical Exclusion Determination East Omak Substation Fiber Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 10/04/2010 Location(s): Okanogan County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration September 30, 2010 CX-004116: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technologies for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Redmond, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

356

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 28, 2010 April 28, 2010 CX-002135: Categorical Exclusion Determination Barr-Tech - Green Waste To Renewable Energy CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/28/2010 Location(s): Sprague, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 27, 2010 CX-002236: Categorical Exclusion Determination C-Farm Electrical, Lighting, and Walkway Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B2.1, B1.3 Date: 04/27/2010 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office April 23, 2010 CX-002213: Categorical Exclusion Determination Spacer replacement along the Hanford-Wautoma #1 and #2 (substation to substation) transmission lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/23/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration

357

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 10, 2009 December 10, 2009 CX-000349: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000348: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Lynden, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000347: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Snohomish County, Washington

358

EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE STRATEGY FOR THE CLEANUP OF K BASINS AT HANFORD SITE WASHINGTON  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

K Basins, consisting of two water-filled storage basins (KW and KE) for spent nuclear fuel (SNF), are part of the 100-K Area of the Hanford Site, along the shoreline of the Columbia River, situated approximately 40 km (25 miles) northwest of the City of Richland, Washington. The KW contained 964 metric tons of SNF in sealed canisters and the KE contained 1152 metric tons of SNF under water in open canisters. The cladding on much of the fuel was damaged allowing the fuel to corrode and degrade during storage underwater. An estimated 1,700 cubic feet of sludge, containing radionuclides and sediments, have accumulated in the KE basin. Various alternatives for removing and processing the SNF, sludge, debris and water were originally evaluated, by USDOE (DOE), in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) with a preferred alternative identified in the Record of Decision. The SNF, sludge, debris and water are ''hazardous substances'' under the Comprehensive, Environmental, Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Leakage of radiologically contaminated water from one of the basins and subsequent detection of increased contamination in a down-gradient monitoring well helped to form the regulatory bases for cleanup action under CERCLA. The realization that actual or threatened release of hazardous substances from the waste sites and K Basins, if not addressed in a timely manner, may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare and environment led to action under CERCLA, with EPA as the lead regulatory agency. Clean-up of the K Basins as a CERCLA site required SNF retrieval, processing, packaging, vacuum drying and transport to a vaulted storage facility for storage, in conformance with a quality assurance program approved by the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM). Excluding the facilities built for SNF drying and vaulted storage, the scope of CERCLA interim remedial action was limited to the removal of fuel, sludge, debris and water. At present, almost all of the spent fuel has been removed from the basins and other activities to remove sludge, debris and water are scheduled to be completed in 2007. Developing environmental documentation and obtaining regulatory approvals for a project which was initiated outside CERCLA and came under CERCLA during execution, was a significant priority to the successful completion of the SNF retrieval, transfer, drying, transport and storage of fuel, within the purview of strong conduct-of-operations culture associated with nuclear facilities. Environmental requirements promulgated in the state regulations by Washington Department of Public Health for radiation were recognized as ''applicable or relevant and appropriate.'' Effective implementation of the environmental compliance strategy in a project that transitioned to CERCLA became a significant challenge involving multiple contractors. This paper provides an overview of the development and implementation of an environmental permitting and surveillance strategy that enabled us to achieve full compliance in a challenging environment, with milestones and cost constraints, while meeting the high safety standards. The details of the strategy as to how continuous rapport with the regulators, facility operators and surveillance groups helped to avoid impacts on the clean-up schedule are discussed. Highlighted are the role of engineered controls, surveillance protocols and triggers for monitoring and reporting, and active administrative controls that were established for the control of emissions, water loss and transport of waste shipments, during the different phases of the project.

AMBALAM, T.

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

The Washington State Experience Energy Code Compliance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington State Experience Washington State Experience Residential Energy Code Compliance Gary Nordeen Senior Building Science Specialist April 4, 2013 WSU Energy Program Provides energy services, products, education and information for: * Businesses * Utilities ̶ public and private * Governments ̶ state and local * Tribes * Federal agencies * Manufacturing plants * Educational facilities * National laboratories WSU Energy Program Building Science Team * Residential energy code technical assistance * Voluntary programs, Northwest ENERGYSTAR Homes * Research and development, Building America * Community-based upgrade programs * Industry training and certifications ̶ HERS, BPI, ENERGY STAR, PTCS Staff provides building science expertise for: WSU Energy Program

360

DOEIEV-0005/20 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

20 20 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedial Action Program Radiological Survey of the Middlesex Municipal Landfill, Middlesex, New Jersey April 1980 , Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Office of Environmental Compliance and Overview Division of Environmental Control Technology DOE/EV-O005/20 UC-70 Formerly Utilized MED/AEC Sites Remedbl Action Program Radiological Survey uf the Middlesex Municipal Landfill, Middlesex, New Jersey April 1980 Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environment Office of Environmental Compliance and Overview Division of Environmec!al Coctrol Technology Washington, D.C. 20545 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

WASTE PACKAGE REMEDIATION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Waste Package Remediation System remediates waste packages (WPs) and disposal containers (DCs) in one of two ways: preparation of rejected DC closure welds for repair or opening of the DC/WP. DCs are brought to the Waste Package Remediation System for preparation of rejected closure welds if testing of the closure weld by the Disposal Container Handling System indicates an unacceptable, but repairable, welding flaw. DC preparation of rejected closure welds will require removal of the weld in such a way that the Disposal Container Handling System may resume and complete the closure welding process. DCs/WPs are brought to the Waste Package Remediation System for opening if the Disposal Container Handling System testing of the DC closure weld indicates an unrepairable welding flaw, or if a WP is recovered from the subsurface repository because suspected damage to the WP or failure of the WP has occurred. DC/WP opening will require cutting of the DC/WP such that a temporary seal may be installed and the waste inside the DC/WP removed by another system. The system operates in a Waste Package Remediation System hot cell located in the Waste Handling Building that has direct access to the Disposal Container Handling System. One DC/WP at a time can be handled in the hot cell. The DC/WP arrives on a transfer cart, is positioned within the cell for system operations, and exits the cell without being removed from the cart. The system includes a wide variety of remotely operated components including a manipulator with hoist and/or jib crane, viewing systems, machine tools for opening WPs, and equipment used to perform pressure and gas composition sampling. Remotely operated equipment is designed to facilitate DC/WP decontamination and hot cell equipment maintenance, and interchangeable components are provided where appropriate. The Waste Package Remediation System interfaces with the Disposal Container Handling System for the receipt and transport of WPs and DCs. The Waste Handling Building System houses the system, and provides the facility, safety, and auxiliary systems required to support operations. The system receives power from the Waste Handling Building Electrical System. The system also interfaces with the various DC systems.

N.D. Sudan

2000-06-22T23:59:59.000Z

362

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Rocky Mountain Remediation Services -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rocky Mountain Remediation Rocky Mountain Remediation Services - EA-97-04 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Rocky Mountain Remediation Services - EA-97-04 June 6, 1997 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to Rocky Mountain Remediation Services related to a Radioactive Material Release during Trench Remediation at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, (EA-97-04) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of noncompliances associated with the dispersal of radioactive material during the remediation of trenches. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Rocky Mountain Remediation Services - EA-97-04 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, Kaiser-Hill Company - EA-97-03 Consent Order, Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC - EA 98-03 Preliminary Notice of Violation , Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site

363

DOE/EA-1155 Uranium Mill Tailing Remedial Action Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

55 55 Uranium Mill Tailing Remedial Action Project Environmental Assessment of Ground- Water Compliance Activities At the Uranium Mill Tailings Site Spook, Wyoming February 1997 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office Grand Junction Office This page intentionally blank : illegible Portions of tbis DISCLAIMER document may be in electronic image products. Images are produced fiom the best available original dOClMXlf?IlL DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liabili- ty or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness,

364

HAZARD CATEGORIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION SITES AT HANFORD WASHINGTON  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Environmental restoration activities, defined here as work to identify and characterize contaminated sites and then contain, treat, remove or dispose of the contamination, now comprises a significant fraction of work in the DOE complex. As with any other DOE activity, a safety analysis must be in place prior to commencing restoration. The rigor and depth of this safety analysis is in part determined by the site's hazard category. This category in turn is determined by the facility's hazardous material inventory and the consequences of its release. Progressively more complicated safety analyses are needed as a facility's hazard category increases from radiological to hazard category three (significant local releases) to hazard category two (significant on-site releases). Thus, a facility's hazard category plays a crucial early role in helping to determine the level of effort devoted to analysis of the facility's individual hazards. Improper determination of the category can result in either an inadequate safety analysis in the case of underestimation of the hazard category, or an unnecessarily cumbersome analysis in the case of overestimation. Contaminated sites have been successfully categorized and safely restored or remediated at the former DOE production site at Hanford, Washington. This paper discusses various means used to categorize former plutonium production or support sites at Hanford. Both preliminary and final hazard categorization is discussed. The importance of the preliminary (initial) hazard categorization in guiding further DOE involvement and approval of the safety analyses is discussed. Compliance to DOE direction provided in ''Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports'', DOE-STD-1027-92, is discussed. DOE recently issued 10 CFR 830, Subpart B which codifies previous DOE safety analysis guidance and orders. The impact of 10 CFR 830, Subpart B on hazard categorization is also discussed.

BISHOP, G.E.

2001-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

Three-Dimensional Groundwater Models of the 300 Area at the Hanford Site, Washington State  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Researchers at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory developed field-scale groundwater flow and transport simulations of the 300 Area to support the 300-FF-5 Operable Unit Phase III Feasibility Study. The 300 Area is located in the southeast portion of the U.S. Department of Energys Hanford Site in Washington State. Historical operations involving uranium fuel fabrication and research activities at the 300 Area have contaminated engineered liquid-waste disposal facilities, the underlying vadose zone, and the uppermost aquifer with uranium. The main objectives of this research were to develop numerical groundwater flow and transport models to help refine the site conceptual model, and to assist assessment of proposed alternative remediation technologies focused on the 300 Area uranium plume.

Williams, Mark D.; Rockhold, Mark L.; Thorne, Paul D.; Chen, Yousu

2008-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Health assessment for Nearshore/Tideflats, Tacoma, Washington, Region 10. CERCLIS No. WAD980726368. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats project site is located in Pierce County, Washington and includes approximately 12 square miles of shallow water, shorelines, tideflats, and upland industrial/commercial sections in and around the City of Tacoma. Since the late 1800s, industrialization of the Commencement Bay area has resulted in many metals, such as lead and arsenic, and organic compounds, such as polychlorinated bipheny (PCBs) and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs), being released into the marine environment. The waterways and the shoreline are impacted by over 400 potential pollutant sources, including storm drains, pulp mills, chemical plants, and oil refineries. Levels of contaminants in bottom fish and shell fish pose a potential public health concern for those consuming local seafood. Levels of contaminants in sediment, surface water, soil, and air may also pose potential public health concerns for remedial workers and those individuals involved in recreational and commercial activities at the site.

Not Available

1988-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

Rethinking remediation technologies for desertified landscapes  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Shrub-dominated communities have replaced native grasslands throughout much of the arid Southwest during the past 120 years. Most currently available remediation technologies are uneconomical due to large inputs of energy, fertilizers, herbicides and labor, or are ecologically ineffective due to harsh environments and the highly competitive nature of these native shrubs. Our analysis of these historical remediation technologies together with new information on ecosystem processes has led us to pursue an ecologically-based approach in which more limited inputs are targeted to promote natural processes of regeneration. Advantages to this approach include lower costs, reduced reliance on agronomic practices, and maintenance of natural landscape features. Disadvantages include longer time required for desired changes to occur, and a need for increased understanding of arid land processes.

Herrick, J.E.; Havstad, K.M. [New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM (United States); Coffin, D.P. [Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO (United States)

1997-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

2010sr31_box-remediation.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Thursday, November 18, 2010 Thursday, November 18, 2010 james-r.giusti@srs.gov Paivi Nettamo, SRNS, (803) 292-2484 paivi.nettamo@srs.gov SRS Recovery Act TRU Waste Project Ahead of Schedule with Box Remediation Program Aiken, SC - The U.S. Department of Energy's Savannah River Site (SRS) started off the last 12 months of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act with an enormous success in its legacy transuranic (TRU) waste program. The H-Canyon

369

Thixotropic gel for vadose zone remediation  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A thixotropic gel suitable for use in subsurface bioremediation is provided along with a process of using the gel. The thixotropic gel provides a non-migrating injectable substrate that can provide below ground barrier properties. In addition, the gel components provide for a favorable environment in which certain contaminants are preferentially sequestered in the gel and subsequently remediated by either indigenous or introduced microorganisms.

Rhia, Brian D. (Augusta, GA)

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

Innovative mathematical modeling in environmental remediation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

There are two different ways to model reactive transport: ad hoc and innovative reaction-based approaches. The former, such as the Kd simplification of adsorption, has been widely employed by practitioners, while the latter has been mainly used in scientific communities for elucidating mechanisms of biogeochemical transport processes. It is believed that innovative mechanistic-based models could serve as protocols for environmental remediation as well. This paper reviews the development of a mechanistically coupled fluid flow, thermal transport, hydrologic transport, and reactive biogeochemical model and example-applications to environmental remediation problems. Theoretical bases are sufficiently described. Four example problems previously carried out are used to demonstrate how numerical experimentation can be used to evaluate the feasibility of different remediation approaches. The first one involved the application of a 56-species uranium tailing problem to the Melton Branch Subwatershed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) using the parallel version of the model. Simulations were made to demonstrate the potential mobilization of uranium and other chelating agents in the proposed waste disposal site. The second problem simulated laboratory-scale system to investigate the role of natural attenuation in potential off-site migration of uranium from uranium mill tailings after restoration. It showed inadequacy of using a single Kd even for a homogeneous medium. The third example simulated laboratory experiments involving extremely high concentrations of uranium, technetium, aluminum, nitrate, and toxic metals (e.g., Ni, Cr, Co). The fourth example modeled microbially-mediated immobilization of uranium in an unconfined aquifer using acetate amendment in a field-scale experiment. The purposes of these modeling studies were to simulate various mechanisms of mobilization and immobilization of radioactive wastes and to illustrate how to apply reactive transport models for environmental remediation.

Gour-Tsyh Yeh; Jin-Ping Gwo; Malcolm D. Siegel; Ming-Hsu Li; Yilin Fang; Fan Zhang; Wensui Luo; Steve B. Yabusaki

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

FEDERAL ENERGY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT judge, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today ordered an expedited fact-finding hearing of the discussions. #12;Chairman Curt L. Hébert, Jr. stated as follows: "At some point, regulatory and R-01-33 (more

Laughlin, Robert B.

372

George Washington University The Department of Philosophy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

George Washington University The Department of Philosophy Announces The Thacher-Reynolds Memorial Fellowship The Department of Philosophy invites applications for the Thacher-Reynolds Memorial Fellowship for a philosophy major in the senior year who has strong interests in graduate or professional studies. At the end

Vertes, Akos

373

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Environmental Health and Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Environmental Health and Safety Design Guide Fire Protection Systems SCOPE. BACKGROUND The University is largely self-insured and believes fire protection significantly reduces its risk protection in many occupancies but fire protection is not required in Group B occupancy buildings. Class B

Wilcock, William

374

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FALL PROTECTION WORK PLAN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FALL PROTECTION WORK PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY This Work Plan Environmental Health and Safety, 206-543-0469 Call: or Seattle Fire Department 9-911 Radio Communication Center skylights, window cleaning. PROTECTION METHODS Specify protection methods for workers exposed to fall hazard

Wilcock, William

375

WWU Sustainability Academy Western Washington University  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

WWU Sustainability Academy Western Washington University Dear colleagues, We cordially extend to you this invitation to join the WWU Sustainability Academy! Following several years of discussion, a group of faculty has started the (tentatively named) "WWU Sustainability Academy." Our goal is to build

Zaferatos, Nicholas C.

376

Washington Clean Technology Alliance | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Alliance Alliance Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Washington Clean Technology Alliance Name Washington Clean Technology Alliance Address 1301 Fifth Avenue Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98101 Region Pacific Northwest Area Year founded 2007 Phone number 206 310 1642 Website http://www.wacleantech.org/ Notes Business alliance for clean tech sectors in Washington state Coordinates 47.608714°, -122.3338038° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.608714,"lon":-122.3338038,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

377

Remedial design through effective electronic associations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Black and Veatch Special Projects Corp. (BVSPC) used an environmental data management system (EDMS) to consolidate x-ray fluorescence (XRF), global positioning system (GPS), and laboratory analytical data into a unique and flexible electronic database. Cost savings were acknowledged in all phases of the remedial design due to the development and use of the EDMS and its distinct associations with various electronic software packages. The EDMS allowed effective and efficient completion of the remedial design investigation of the Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt Site. The Site is a 125-year old mining community in Jasper County, Missouri. Approximately 6,500 residences are now located within the 60 square-mile Superfund Site where lead and zinc were mined. Smelting and mining activities were conducted in several areas throughout the community. These operations left approximately 9 million tons of mine wastes at the Site upon completion of the mining activities. The purpose of the remedial design investigation was to quantify and identify the residential yards that were adversely affected by these activities.

Deis, J.L.; Wankum, R.D.

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Grants to someone by E-mail Grants to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Grants The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

379

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

380

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Rebates to someone by E-mail Rebates to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Rebates The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

382

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

383

Washington's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

1st congressional district: Energy Resources 1st congressional district: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. This page represents a congressional district in Washington. Contents 1 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 1st congressional district 2 Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional district 3 Registered Energy Companies in Washington's 1st congressional district 4 Registered Financial Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional district 5 Utility Companies in Washington's 1st congressional district US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Washington's 1st congressional district Snohomish County Public Utilities District Smart Grid Project Registered Networking Organizations in Washington's 1st congressional

384

Federal Government Congressional Budget Office, Budget Analysis Division Washington, DC  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Washington, DC Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Government Congressional Budget Office, Budget Analysis Division Washington, DC Department Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation & Air Quality Ann Arbor, MI Federal Drug

Shyy, Wei

385

Price of Washington Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Washington Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Price of Washington Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4...

386

Leasing State Trust Lands in Washington | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Trust Lands in Washington Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: Leasing State Trust Lands in WashingtonLegal Abstract The...

387

An Introduction to Washington Water Law | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

An Introduction to Washington Water Law Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: An Introduction to Washington Water LawLegal...

388

DOE, Washington Closure complete recycling project at Hanford  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recently teamed with contractor Washington Closure Hanford to complete a major recycling effort during cleanup of the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State.

389

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Other to someone by E-mail Other to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Other on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Other The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

390

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Biodiesel to someone by E-mail Biodiesel to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Biodiesel The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

391

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

EVs to someone by E-mail EVs to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for EVs The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

392

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

to someone by E-mail to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives Listed below are the summaries of all current Washington laws, incentives, regulations, funding opportunities, and other initiatives related to

393

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Ethanol to someone by E-mail Ethanol to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Washington Laws and Incentives for Ethanol The list below contains summaries of all Washington laws and incentives

394

Science in support of the Deepwater Horizon response  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Protection Agency (EPA) were well-versed in oil response and remediation and the National Response Team responded quickly, the...management tool previously available only to responders, the innovative ERMA, was rapidly transformed into a publicly accessible...

Jane Lubchenco; Marcia K. McNutt; Gabrielle Dreyfus; Steven A. Murawski; David M. Kennedy; Paul T. Anastas; Steven Chu; Tom Hunter

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

395

EIS-0205: Joint NEPA/SEPA Final Environmental Impact Statement Washington Windplant No. 1, Goldendale, Washington  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energys Bonneville Power Administration prepared this statement in order to fulfill its National Environmental Policy Act obligations ahead of signing an agreement with the utilities that would purchase the Windplants power from KENETECH. KENETECH Windpower, Inc., proposes to construct and operate Washington Windplant No. 1 in the Columbia Hills area, southeast of Goldendale, in Klickitat County, Washington.

396

Evaluating In Situ Treatment Technologies for Buried Mixed Waste Remediation at the INEEL  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Mixed radioactive and hazardous wastes were buried at the Department of Energy's Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Subsurface Disposal Area from 1952 to 1969. To begin the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) remediation process for the Subsurface Disposal Area, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) added the INEEL to its National Priorities List in 1989. DOE's Office of Environmental Restoration is planning several CERCLA treatability studies of remedial technologies that will be evaluated for potential remediation of the buried waste in the Subsurface Disposal Area. This paper discusses the in situ treatability studies that will be performed, including in situ vitrification, in situ grouting, and in situ thermal desorption. The in situ treatability studies will be conducted on simulated and actual buried wastes at the INEEL in 1999 and 2000. Results from the treatability studies will provide substantial information on the feasibility, implementability, and cost of applying these technologies to the INEEL Subsurface Disposal Area. In addition, much of the treatability study data will be applicable to buried waste site remediation efforts across the DOE complex.

D.F. Nickelson; D.K. Jorgensen; J.J. Jessmore; R.A. Hyde; R.K. Farnsworth

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

397

Evaluating In Situ Treatment Technologies for Buried Mixed Waste Remediation at the INEEL  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Mixed radioactive and hazardous wastes were buried at the Department of Energys Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Subsurface Disposal Area from 1952 to 1969. To begin the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) remediation process for the Subsurface Disposal Area, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) added the INEEL to its National Priorities List in 1989. DOEs Office of Environmental Restoration is planning several CERCLA treatability studies of remedial technologies that will be evaluated for potential remediation of the buried waste in the Subsurface Disposal Area. This paper discusses the in situ treatability studies that will be performed, including in situ vitrification, in situ grouting, and in situ thermal desorption. The in situ treatability studies will be conducted on simulated and actual buried wastes at the INEEL in 1999 and 2000. Results from the treatability studies will provide substantial information on the feasibility, implementability, and cost of applying these technologies to the INEEL Subsurface Disposal Area. In addition, much of the treatability study data will be applicable to buried waste site remediation efforts across the DOE complex.

Jorgensen, Douglas Kay; Nickelson, David Frank; Nickelson, Reva Anne; Farnsworth, Richard Kent; Jessmore, James Joseph

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

398

Salmon Site Remedial Investigation Report, Exhibit 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Salmon Site Remedial Investigation Report provides the results of activities initiated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to determine if contamination at the Salmon Site poses a current or future risk to human health and the environment. These results were used to develop and evaluate a range of risk-based remedial alternatives. Located in Lamar County, Mississippi, the Salmon Site was used by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (predecessor to the DOE) between 1964 and 1970 for two nuclear and two gas explosions conducted deep underground in a salt dome. The testing resulted in the release of radionuclides into the salt dome. During reentry drilling and other site activities, liquid and solid wastes containing radioactivity were generated resulting in surface soil and groundwater contamination. Most of the waste and contaminated soil and water were disposed of in 1993 during site restoration either in the cavities left by the tests or in an injection well. Other radioactive wastes were transported to the Nevada Test Site for disposal. Nonradioactive wastes were disposed of in pits at the site and capped with clean soil and graded. The preliminary investigation showed residual contamination in the Surface Ground Zero mud pits below the water table. Remedial investigations results concluded the contaminant concentrations detected present no significant risk to existing and/or future land users, if surface institutional controls and subsurface restrictions are maintained. Recent sampling results determined no significant contamination in the surface or shallow subsurface. The test cavity resulting from the experiments is contaminated and cannot be economically remediated with existing technologies. The ecological sampling did not detect biological uptake of contaminants in the plants or animals sampled. Based on the current use of the Salmon Site, the following remedial actions were identified to protect both human health and the environment: (1) the installation of a water supply system that will provide potable water to the site and residence in the proximity to the site; (2) continued maintenance of surface institutional controls and subsurface restrictions; and (3) continue to implement the long-term hydrologic monitoring program. The Salmon Site will be relinquished the State of Mississippi as mandated by Public Law 104-201-September 23, 1996, to be used as a demonstration forest/wildlife refuge. Should the land use change in the future and/or monitoring information indicates a change in the site conditions, the DOE will reassess the risk impacts to human health and the environment.

USDOE NV

1999-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

Salmon Site Remedial Investigation Report, Exhibit 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Salmon Site Remedial Investigation Report provides the results of activities initiated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to determine if contamination at the Salmon Site poses a current or future risk to human health and the environment. These results were used to develop and evaluate a range of risk-based remedial alternatives. Located in Lamar County, Mississippi, the Salmon Site was used by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (predecessor to the DOE) between 1964 and 1970 for two nuclear and two gas explosions conducted deep underground in a salt dome. The testing resulted in the release of radionuclides into the salt dome. During reentry drilling and other site activities, liquid and solid wastes containing radioactivity were generated resulting in surface soil and groundwater contamination. Most of the waste and contaminated soil and water were disposed of in 1993 during site restoration either in the cavities left by the tests or in an injection well. Other radioactive wastes were transported to the Nevada Test Site for disposal. Nonradioactive wastes were disposed of in pits at the site and capped with clean soil and graded. The preliminary investigation showed residual contamination in the Surface Ground Zero mud pits below the water table. Remedial investigations results concluded the contaminant concentrations detected present no significant risk to existing and/or future land users, if surface institutional controls and subsurface restrictions are maintained. Recent sampling results determined no significant contamination in the surface or shallow subsurface. The test cavity resulting from the experiments is contaminated and cannot be economically remediated with existing technologies. The ecological sampling did not detect biological uptake of contaminants in the plants or animals sampled. Based on the current use of the Salmon Site, the following remedial actions were identified to protect both human health and the environment: (1) the installation of a water supply system that will provide potable water to the site and residence in the proximity to the site; (2) continued maintenance of surface institutional controls and subsurface restrictions; and (3) continue to implement the long-term hydrologic monitoring program. The Salmon Site will be relinquished the State of Mississippi as mandated by Public Law 104-201-September 23, 1996, to be used as a demonstration forest/wildlife refuge. Should the land use change in the future and/or monitoring information indicates a change in the site conditions, the DOE will reassess the risk impacts to human health and the environment.

USDOE /NV

1999-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

Salmon Site Remedial Investigation Report, Exhibit 5  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Salmon Site Remedial Investigation Report provides the results of activities initiated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to determine if contamination at the Salmon Site poses a current or future risk to human health and the environment. These results were used to develop and evaluate a range of risk-based remedial alternatives. Located in Lamar County, Mississippi, the Salmon Site was used by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (predecessor to the DOE) between 1964 and 1970 for two nuclear and two gas explosions conducted deep underground in a salt dome. The testing resulted in the release of radionuclides into the salt dome. During reentry drilling and other site activities, liquid and solid wastes containing radioactivity were generated resulting in surface soil and groundwater contamination. Most of the waste and contaminated soil and water were disposed of in 1993 during site restoration either in the cavities left by the tests or in an injection well. Other radioactive wastes were transported to the Nevada Test Site for disposal. Nonradioactive wastes were disposed of in pits at the site and capped with clean soil and graded. The preliminary investigation showed residual contamination in the Surface Ground Zero mud pits below the water table. Remedial investigations results concluded the contaminant concentrations detected present no significant risk to existing and/or future land users, if surface institutional controls and subsurface restrictions are maintained. Recent sampling results determined no significant contamination in the surface or shallow subsurface. The test cavity resulting from the experiments is contaminated and cannot be economically remediated with existing technologies. The ecological sampling did not detect biological uptake of contaminants in the plants or animals sampled. Based on the current use of the Salmon Site, the following remedial actions were identified to protect both human health and the environment: (1) the installation of a water supply system that will provide potable water to the site and residence in the proximity to the site; (2) continued maintenance of surface institutional controls and subsurface restrictions; and (3) continue to implement the long-term hydrologic monitoring program. The Salmon Site will be relinquished the State of Mississippi as mandated by Public Law 104-201-September 23, 1996, to be used as a demonstration forest/wildlife refuge. Should the land use change in the future and/or monitoring information indicates a change in the site conditions, the DOE will reassess the risk impacts to human health and the environment.

USDOE /NV

1999-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

FUPWG Spring 2011 Washington, D.C., Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Washington update, and is given during the FUPWG Spring 2011 meeting.

402

Remedial investigation report for J-Field, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. Volume 3: Ecological risk assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Environmental Management Division of the U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), Maryland, is conducting a remedial investigation (RI) and feasibility study (FS) of the J-Field area at APG, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended. As part of that activity, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) conducted an ecological risk assessment (ERA) of the J-Field site. This report presents the results of that assessment.

Hlohowskyj, I.; Hayse, J.; Kuperman, R.; Van Lonkhuyzen, R.

2000-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

403

Evaluation of Final Radiological Conditions at Areas of the Niagara Falls Storage Site Remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation of Final Radiological Conditions at Areas of the Niagara Falls Storage Site Remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (March 2012)

404

1979-1980 Geothermal Resource Assessment Program in Washington  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Separate abstracts were prepared for seven papers. Also included are a bibliography of geothermal resource information for the State of Washington, well temperature information and locations in the State of Washington, and a map of the geology of the White Pass-Tumac Mountain Area, Washington. (MHR)

Korosec, M.A.; Schuster, J.E.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants Applied Field Research  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants Applied Field Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants Applied Field Research Initiative (RoMIC-AFRI) Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants Applied Field Research Initiative (RoMIC-AFRI) Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants Applied Field Research Initiative (RoMIC-AFRI) Located on the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, the RoMIC-AFRI was established to protect water resources by addressing the challenge of preventing contamination. The initiative at Oak Ridge is a collaborative effort that leverages DOE investments in basic science and applied research and the work of site contractors to address the complex challenges in the remediation of legacy waste at the Oak Ridge Reservation. The mission of the Remediation of Mercury and Industrial Contaminants

406

Savannah River Remediation Intern Sees Nuclear Industry as Job Opportunity  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Remediation Intern Sees Nuclear Industry as Job Savannah River Remediation Intern Sees Nuclear Industry as Job Opportunity Savannah River Remediation Intern Sees Nuclear Industry as Job Opportunity July 9, 2012 - 10:00am Addthis Spencer Isom, second year engineering intern for Savannah River Remediation (SRR) and fourth summer at Savannah River Site (SRS), performs a standard equipment check at Saltstone Production Facility. | Photo courtesy of Savannah River Site Spencer Isom, second year engineering intern for Savannah River Remediation (SRR) and fourth summer at Savannah River Site (SRS), performs a standard equipment check at Saltstone Production Facility. | Photo courtesy of Savannah River Site Maddie M. Blair Public Affairs Intern, Savannah River Remediation Why does she keep coming back? "There are so many fascinating processes, people, and work

407

Independent Activity Report, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Activity Report, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company Independent Activity Report, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company - January 2011 January 2011 Review of the CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company Unreviewed Safety Question Procedure [ARPT-RL-2011-003] The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, during a site visit from January 10-14, 2011, presented the results of a technical review of the CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (PRC) Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ) Procedure. Independent Activity Report, CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company - January 2011 More Documents & Publications CX-009415: Categorical Exclusion Determination Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011

408

Savannah River Remediation Intern Sees Nuclear Industry as Job Opportunity  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Remediation Intern Sees Nuclear Industry as Job Savannah River Remediation Intern Sees Nuclear Industry as Job Opportunity Savannah River Remediation Intern Sees Nuclear Industry as Job Opportunity July 9, 2012 - 10:00am Addthis Spencer Isom, second year engineering intern for Savannah River Remediation (SRR) and fourth summer at Savannah River Site (SRS), performs a standard equipment check at Saltstone Production Facility. | Photo courtesy of Savannah River Site Spencer Isom, second year engineering intern for Savannah River Remediation (SRR) and fourth summer at Savannah River Site (SRS), performs a standard equipment check at Saltstone Production Facility. | Photo courtesy of Savannah River Site Maddie M. Blair Public Affairs Intern, Savannah River Remediation Why does she keep coming back? "There are so many fascinating processes, people, and work

409

Gas: A Neglected Phase in Remediation of Metals and Radionuclides  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The gas phase is generally ignored in remediation of metals and radionuclides because it is assumed that there is no efficient way to exploit it. In the literal sense, all remediations involve the gas phase because this phase is linked to the liquid and solid phases by vapor pressure and thermodynamic relationships. Remediation methods that specifically use the gas phase as a central feature have primarily targeted volatile organic contaminants, not metals and radionuclides. Unlike many organic contaminants, the vapor pressure and Henry's Law constants of metals and radionuclides are not generally conducive to direct air stripping of dissolved contaminants. Nevertheless, the gas phase can play an important role in remediation of inorganic contaminants and provide opportunities for efficient, cost effective remediation. The objective here is to explore ways in which manipulation of the gas phase can be used to facilitate remediation of metals and radionuclides.

Denham, Miles E.; Looney, Brian B

2005-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

410

Part 2: Quality Assurance Project Plan Remedial Investigation, UMore East  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Part 2: Quality Assurance Project Plan Remedial Investigation, UMore East Dakota County, Minnesota\\23191092 UMore 1948 Parcel Remedial Inv\\WorkFiles\\SAP\\Part 2-QAPP Umore East v2.1\\QAPP rev. 2.1.doc A2 Table\\19\\23191092 UMore 1948 Parcel Remedial Inv\\WorkFiles\\SAP\\Part 2-QAPP Umore East v2.1\\QAPP rev. 2

Netoff, Theoden

411

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Olympia, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0378741°, -122.9006951° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0378741,"lon":-122.9006951,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

412

Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources Lacey, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0342629°, -122.8231915° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0342629,"lon":-122.8231915,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

413

Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources Hobart, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4217682°, -121.972893° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4217682,"lon":-121.972893,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

414

Bremerton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bremerton, Washington: Energy Resources Bremerton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5673176°, -122.6326391° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5673176,"lon":-122.6326391,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

415

Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources Sammamish, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6417664°, -122.0803998° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6417664,"lon":-122.0803998,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

416

Washington Elec Member Corp | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington Elec Member Corp Washington Elec Member Corp Place Georgia Utility Id 20146 Utility Location Yes Ownership C NERC Location SERC NERC SERC Yes ISO Other Yes Activity Distribution Yes References EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1_a[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png 1,000 Watt HPS Cobra Lighting 1,000 Watt HPS Flood Lighting 1,000 Watt MH Flood Lighting 100 Watt HPS Lighting 175 Watt MV 250 Watt HPS Lighting 250 Watt HPS Cobra Head Lighting 250 Watt HPS Flood Lighting 400 Watt HPS Cobra Head Lighting 400 Watt HPS Flood Lighting Rate-01 (RS) Residential Rate-02 (GSND) Commercial Rate-07 (GSD) Commercial Rate-08 (GS) Primary

417

Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources Kingsgate, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.727043°, -122.1795689° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.727043,"lon":-122.1795689,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

418

Washington Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View History Natural Gas in Storage 30,412 33,787 37,711 40,833 43,621 45,359 1990-2013

419

Notices 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11 Federal Register 11 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659. Dated: June 20, 2011. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011-15859 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]

420

Milton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Milton, Washington: Energy Resources Milton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.2481558°, -122.312899° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.2481558,"lon":-122.312899,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources Spokane, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Spokane, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6587802°, -117.4260466° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6587802,"lon":-117.4260466,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

422

Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources Mirrormont, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4623237°, -121.9956724° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4623237,"lon":-121.9956724,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

423

Bonneville Power Admin (Washington) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bonneville Power Admin Bonneville Power Admin Place Washington Utility Id 1738 References Energy Information Administration.[1] LinkedIn Connections CrunchBase Profile No CrunchBase profile. Create one now! This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utility Rate Schedules Grid-background.png No rate schedules available. Average Rates Industrial: $0.0046/kWh The following table contains monthly sales and revenue data for Bonneville Power Admin (Washington). Month RES REV (THOUSAND $) RES SALES (MWH) RES CONS COM REV (THOUSAND $) COM SALES (MWH) COM CONS IND_REV (THOUSAND $) IND SALES (MWH) IND CONS OTH REV (THOUSAND $) OTH SALES (MWH) OTH CONS TOT REV (THOUSAND $) TOT SALES (MWH) TOT CONS 2009-03 2,220.339 71,908.718 8 2,220.339 71,908.718 8

424

Notices 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

53 Federal Register 53 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2013 / Notices 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ''eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ''eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659. Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 2, 2013. Dated: March 15, 2013. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013-06602 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

425

Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources Issaquah, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5301011°, -122.0326191° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5301011,"lon":-122.0326191,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

426

Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources Snoqualmie, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5287132°, -121.8253906° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5287132,"lon":-121.8253906,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

427

Tumwater, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tumwater, Washington: Energy Resources Tumwater, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0073187°, -122.9093063° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0073187,"lon":-122.9093063,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

428

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 JAN 2 2 1982 -/ Departmznt'of Ene,rgy ATTN : Dr. William E. Mott, Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division (EP-32) Washington, D.C. 20545 Dear Dr. Mott: Enclosed is the list of contaminated'or potentially contaminated sites that I promised to send you during our recent meeting. The sites have been broken down into the followi,ng four categories: 1. Sites with known contamination that have never been 1 icensed. 2. Formerly licensed sites with known contamination. 3. Currently licensed sites that are being decontaminated prior to decoronissioning. 4. A list of formerly licensed sites that need to be visited to determine if they have been properly decontaminated prior to decommissioning.

429

Washington Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Connecticut Delaware Georgia Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Connecticut Delaware Georgia Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes

430

Lind, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lind, Washington: Energy Resources Lind, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.9720892°, -118.6152653° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.9720892,"lon":-118.6152653,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

431

University of Washington | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search Jump to: navigation, search Name University of Washington Place Seattle, Washington Product Public research university with campuses in Seattle, Tacoma, and Bothell. Coordinates 47.60356°, -122.329439° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.60356,"lon":-122.329439,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

432

Yelm, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Yelm, Washington: Energy Resources Yelm, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.9420431°, -122.6059582° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.9420431,"lon":-122.6059582,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

433

Woodinville, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Woodinville, Washington: Energy Resources Woodinville, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7542651°, -122.1634582° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7542651,"lon":-122.1634582,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

434

Covington, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington: Energy Resources Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.348333°, -122.113611° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.348333,"lon":-122.113611,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

435

Tanner, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tanner, Washington: Energy Resources Tanner, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4753806°, -121.7462201° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4753806,"lon":-121.7462201,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

436

Burien, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Burien, Washington: Energy Resources Burien, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4703767°, -122.3467918° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4703767,"lon":-122.3467918,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

437

Shoreline, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Shoreline, Washington: Energy Resources Shoreline, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7556531°, -122.3415178° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7556531,"lon":-122.3415178,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

438

Skykomish, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Skykomish, Washington: Energy Resources Skykomish, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7092746°, -121.3601014° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7092746,"lon":-121.3601014,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

439

Enumclaw, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Enumclaw, Washington: Energy Resources Enumclaw, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.2042681°, -121.9915003° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.2042681,"lon":-121.9915003,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

440

Renton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Renton, Washington: Energy Resources Renton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4828776°, -122.2170661° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4828776,"lon":-122.2170661,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 9, 2010 March 9, 2010 CX-001183: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Rock Creek-John Day Number 1 Spacers CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/09/2010 Location(s): Klickitat County, Washington Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 3, 2010 CX-001185: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Spacer Dampers Along the Wautoma-Rock Creek Number 1 500 Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/03/2010 Location(s): Benton County, Yakima County, Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration March 1, 2010 CX-001040: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Coalition Petroleum Reduction Project - Conversion CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

442

Eastgate, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Eastgate, Washington: Energy Resources Eastgate, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5723°, -122.134912° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5723,"lon":-122.134912,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

443

Rainier, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Rainier, Washington: Energy Resources Rainier, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.888155°, -122.6884595° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.888155,"lon":-122.6884595,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

444

Bucoda, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bucoda, Washington: Energy Resources Bucoda, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.7989899°, -122.8698523° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.7989899,"lon":-122.8698523,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

445

Ritzville, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ritzville, Washington: Energy Resources Ritzville, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.1273723°, -118.3799751° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.1273723,"lon":-118.3799751,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

446

Washington, DC | Building Energy Codes Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington, DC Washington, DC Last updated on 2013-08-02 Current News In December, the DC CCCB voted 7-1 to adopt the 2012 IECC. The code will now enter administrative review and legislative process with likely adoption in the second half of 2013. Commercial Residential Code Change Current Code ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 with Amendments Amendments / Additional State Code Information Based on 2008 DC Construction Code with several amendments. State Specific Research Impacts of ASHRAE 90.1-2007 for Commercial Buildings in the District of Columbia (BECP Report, Sept. 2009) Approximate Energy Efficiency Equivalent to ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Effective Date 12/26/2009 Adoption Date 12/26/2008 Code Enforcement Mandatory DOE Determination ASHRAE 90.1-2007: Yes ASHRAE 90.1-2010: No DC DOE Determination Letter, May 31, 2013

447

Tukwila, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Tukwila, Washington: Energy Resources Tukwila, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4739884°, -122.2609558° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4739884,"lon":-122.2609558,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

448

Newcastle, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Newcastle, Washington: Energy Resources Newcastle, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.5389889°, -122.1556769° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.5389889,"lon":-122.1556769,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

449

Acme, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Acme, Washington: Energy Resources Acme, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 48.7170574°, -122.2051584° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":48.7170574,"lon":-122.2051584,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

450

Pacific, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Pacific, Washington: Energy Resources Pacific, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.2645452°, -122.2501201° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.2645452,"lon":-122.2501201,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

451

Hatton, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Hatton, Washington: Energy Resources Hatton, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.7759744°, -118.8263881° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.7759744,"lon":-118.8263881,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

452

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources Olympia, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.0378741°, -122.9006951° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.0378741,"lon":-122.9006951,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

453

Washington Natural Gas Consumption by End Use  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Period: Monthly Annual Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 View History Volumes Delivered to Consumers

454

Riverbend, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Riverbend, Washington: Energy Resources Riverbend, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4664916°, -121.7503869° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4664916,"lon":-121.7503869,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

455

Washington Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View History Natural Gas in Storage 30,412 33,787 37,711 40,833 43,621 45,359 1990-2013

456

Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources Kirkland, Washington: Energy Resources (Redirected from Kirkland, WA) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6814875°, -122.2087353° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6814875,"lon":-122.2087353,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

457

Ahtanum, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ahtanum, Washington: Energy Resources Ahtanum, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.5595702°, -120.6220123° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.5595702,"lon":-120.6220123,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

458

Washtucna, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washtucna, Washington: Energy Resources Washtucna, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.7565354°, -118.3105282° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.7565354,"lon":-118.3105282,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

459

Everett, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Everett, Washington: Energy Resources Everett, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.9789848°, -122.2020794° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.9789848,"lon":-122.2020794,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

460

Medina, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington: Energy Resources Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6209323°, -122.2276237° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6209323,"lon":-122.2276237,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

From The Washington Post's Federal Diary:  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

The Washington Post's Federal Diary: The Washington Post's Federal Diary: Merit Pay in a Nuclear Test Project By Stephen Barr Friday, March 28, 2008; D04 The agency that maintains the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile is undertaking a five-year project to overhaul pay practices so it will be more competitive in hiring scientists, engineers and other professionals. Under the pilot project, the National Nuclear Security Administration will leave the government-wide pay system -- the 15-grade General Schedule -- and replace it with up to four broad salary scales, or pay bands, designed to reward the best workers based on job performance rather than length of service. Employees will be rated on the work they do and their level of accomplishment, and will earn "shares" that

462

Redmond, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Redmond, Washington: Energy Resources Redmond, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6739881°, -122.121512° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6739881,"lon":-122.121512,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

463

Ravensdale, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Ravensdale, Washington: Energy Resources Ravensdale, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.3523235°, -121.9837251° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.3523235,"lon":-121.9837251,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

464

Washington Technology Center | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Technology Center Technology Center Name Washington Technology Center Address 300 Fluke Hall Place Seattle, Washington Zip 98195 Region Pacific Northwest Area Coordinates 47.6537802°, -122.3013926° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6537802,"lon":-122.3013926,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

465

Kenmore, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Washington: Energy Resources Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7573202°, -122.2440148° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7573202,"lon":-122.2440148,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

466

Carnation, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Carnation, Washington: Energy Resources Carnation, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.6478787°, -121.9140073° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.6478787,"lon":-121.9140073,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

467

Baring, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Baring, Washington: Energy Resources Baring, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7731614°, -121.485382° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7731614,"lon":-121.485382,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

468

Othello, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Othello, Washington: Energy Resources Othello, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 46.8259742°, -119.1752913° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":46.8259742,"lon":-119.1752913,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

469

Vashon, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Vashon, Washington: Energy Resources Vashon, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.4473204°, -122.4598502° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.4473204,"lon":-122.4598502,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

470

Duvall, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Duvall, Washington: Energy Resources Duvall, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7423218°, -121.9856781° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7423218,"lon":-121.9856781,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

471

Bothell, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Bothell, Washington: Energy Resources Bothell, Washington: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.7623204°, -122.2054035° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":47.7623204,"lon":-122.2054035,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

472

Remediation of environmental contaminants by novel organoclay adsorbents.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??Naturally occuring layer silicate clay minerals could be value-added by modifying the surface properties in order to enhance their efficacy in the remediation of environmental (more)

Sarkar, Binoy

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

SBA Increases Size Standards for Waste Remediation Services ...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Remediation Services & InformationAdmin Support December 12, 2012 - 10:22am Addthis John Hale III John Hale III Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization...

474

EPA - National Remedy Review Board webpage | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Review Board webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: EPA - National Remedy Review Board webpage Abstract This webpage provides...

475

Hydrogen Embrittlement of Pipeline Steels: Causes and Remediation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Embrittlement of Pipeline Steels: Causes and Remediation P. Sofronis, I. M. Robertson, D. D. Johnson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group...

476

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DOE has determined that the contamination is not attirbutable to the AEC-sponsored operations. Therefore, DOE does not have legal authority to conduct remedial actions at...

477

Hydrogen Embrittlement of Pipeline Steels: Causes and Remediation...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Barriers: Hydrogen embrittlement of pipelines and remediation (mixing with water vapor?) hpwgwembrittlementsteelssofronis.pdf More Documents & Publications Webinar: I2CNER: An...

478

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Remedial Action and Waste Technology Division of Facility and Site...

479

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH LABORATORY) WINCHESTER, MASSACHUSE'ITS Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Remedial Action and Waste Technology Division of Facility and...

480

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

PITTSBURGH PLANT FOREST HILLS PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Remedial Action and Waste Technology Division of Facility and...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "remedial response washington" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

SYLVANIA-CORNING NUCLEAR CORPORATION BAYSIDE, NEW YORK VW. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Remedial Action and Waste Technology Division of Facility and...

482

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY NEW YORK, NEW YORK Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Remedial Action and Waste Technology Division of Facility and Site Decommissioning...

483

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OF ARIZONA (U.S. BUREAU OF MINES) TUCSON, ARIZONA Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Remedial Action and Waste Technology Division of Facility and...

484

Waterjet injection of powdered activated carbon for sediment remediation .  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??"In situ sediment remediation through waterjet-activated carbon amendment delivery is an innovative means to mitigate the dangers posed by hydrophobic organic compounds. Ease of use (more)

Redell, Chris J.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z