Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 21, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 244)] December 21, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 244)] [Proposed Rules] [Page 71331-71333] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr21de99-21] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Parts 71 and 73 RIN 3150-AG41 Advance Notification to Native American Tribes of Transportation of Certain Types of Nuclear Waste AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering an amendment to its regulations that would require NRC licensees to notify

2

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT POWER EXCHANGE MARKET The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a staff settlement calling-2-001 COMMISSION APPROVES $13.8 MILLION SETTLEMENT WITH RELIANT ENERGY OVER PHYSICAL WITHHOLDING IN CALIFORNIA

Laughlin, Robert B.

3

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT FERC APPROVES SETTLEMENT WITH RELIANT IN CALIFORNIA CASES; PROCEEDS COULD TOTAL $50 MILLION The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a settlement between the Commission's enforcement staff

Laughlin, Robert B.

4

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACTS al. COMMISSION ACCEPTS ENRON SETTLEMENT VALUED AT $1.5 BILLION The Federal Energy Regulatory-2001 Western energy crisis, said Commission Chairman Joseph T. Kelliher. "The parties are to be congratulated

Laughlin, Robert B.

5

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT-95-191 COMMISSION APPROVES TWO WESTERN POWER SETTLEMENTS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved two markets during the Western energy crisis of 2000-2001. The first case involves a settlement agreement

Laughlin, Robert B.

6

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON,D.C.20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 1290 OF EPACT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a settlement, collectively valued at $6.4 billion, which the Commission has approved stemming from the California energy

Laughlin, Robert B.

7

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT POWER MARKETS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today ordered its staff to conduct investigators will find out if any technical or operational factors, federal or state regulatory prohibitions

Laughlin, Robert B.

8

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT AND FERC STAFF The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today accepted a settlement, valued at nearly $500 stemming from the 2000-2001 energy crisis in California and other Western states. The global settlement

Laughlin, Robert B.

9

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today accepted an agreement between Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. AGREEMENT ACCEPTED BETWEEN ENRON AND NEVADA COMPANIES SETTLING MATTERS STEMMING FROM WESTERN ENERGY CRISIS

Laughlin, Robert B.

10

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT CRISIS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a comprehensive settlement among APX Inc. Coral Power LLC, Puget Sound Energy Inc. and Avista are Supporting Parties. R-07-14 (30) #12;

Laughlin, Robert B.

11

Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission More Documents & Publications What to Expect When Readying to Move Spent Nuclear Fuel from...

12

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This thirty-second volume of issuances (1--496) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and Administrative Law Judges it covers the period from July 1, 1990 to December 31, 1990. The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a six-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly softbounds and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition. Cross references in the text and indexes are to the NRCI page numbers which are the same as the page numbers in this publication. Issuances are referred to as follows: Commission--CLI, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards--ALAB, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards--LBP, Administrative Law Judges--ALJ, Directors'Decisions--DD, and Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking--DPRM. Specific facilities discussed are: Carroll County Nuclear Station; Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station; Perry Nuclear Power Plant; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Stations; Seabrook Station; Shoreham Nuclear Generating Plant; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant.

Not Available

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters | Department  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters GC-52 provides legal advice to DOE regarding Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulatory and licensing matters of interest to DOE, either as an NRC license applicant or in connection with related authorities and responsibilities of DOE and NRC on nuclear material, nuclear waste, and nuclear nonproliferation matters. GC-52 attorneys provide advice and support on a variety of NRC matters including regulation and licensing of DOE independent spent fuel storage facilities (ISFSIs) and a mixed-oxide fuel fabrication facility, consultation with NRC on certain DOE waste determinations, and imports and exports of nuclear materials and radioactive sealed sources.

14

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Handling of Beyond Design Basis Events for Nuclear Power Reactors  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Bill Reckley, Chief, Policy and Support Branch, Japan Lessons-Learned Project Directorate, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

15

EVALUATION REPORT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2 Attachment OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY OBJECTIVE To determine whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) unclassified cybersecurity program adequately...

16

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management * 20+ years of...

17

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ), the Directors` Decisions (DD), and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM). The summaries and headnotes preceding the opinions reported herein are not to be deemed a part of those opinions or have any independent legal significance.

NONE

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STATES OF AMERICA STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Oregon NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (December 3, 2010) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC's application for license for the Reedsport OPT Wave Park Project

19

California Energy Commission REGULATIONS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission REGULATIONS NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING ENERGY Office Manager High Performance Buildings and Standards Development Office Dave Ashuckian Deputy Director Efficiency and Renewable Energy Division Robert Oglesby Executive Director DISCLAIMER

20

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

qU oSoLTJRC qU oSoLTJRC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Protecting People and the Environment NUREG-1872, Vol. 2 HudcD [jE©wftamfsýýpc Wafm(M oran EA Office of New Reactors AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room at http:t/www.nrc..ov/reading-rm.html. Publicly released records include, to name a few, NUREG-series publications; Federal Register notices; applicant, licensee, and vendor documents and correspondence; NRC correspondence and internal memoranda; bulletins and information notices; inspection and investigative reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers and their attachments.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Oversight  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Oversight Process Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Oversight Process September 19, 2012 Presenter: Undine Shoop, Chief, Health Physics and Human Performance Branch, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Topics covered: Purpose of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) ROP Framework Safety Culture within the ROP Safety Culture Assessments Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Oversight Process More Documents & Publications A Commissioner's Perspective on USNRC Actions in Response to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Comparison of Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA) and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) for Fuel Cycle Facilities, 2/17/11

22

Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and the Federal Reliability and the Federal and the Federal Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Energy Regulatory Commission Commission Michael Peters Michael Peters Energy Infrastructure & Cyber Security Advisor Energy Infrastructure & Cyber Security Advisor Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 202 202 - - 502 502 - - 8461 8461 Michael.Peters@FERC.GOV Michael.Peters@FERC.GOV The views expressed in this The views expressed in this presentation do not represent the presentation do not represent the views of the Federal Energy views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or the United Regulatory Commission or the United States. States. These views are the personal opinion These views are the personal opinion of Mike Peters!!!! of Mike Peters!!!! ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺

23

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor FEBRUARY 2013 CEC3002013002SD #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Lorraine Gonzalez Angela Gould Primary Authors and Project Managers Kate Zocchetti

24

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 AUG i 3 1979 ,,~---Y--*. FCAF:Wi3 )I 70-364 : i: SNM-414,jAmendment No. 3 --A Babcock and Wilcox Company Nuclear Materials Division ATTN: Mr. Michael A. Austin Manager, Technical Control 609 North Warren Avenue Apollo, Pennsylvania 15613 Gentiemen: (1 i' \ (. \ In accordance with your application dated June 18, 1979, and pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 70, Materials License SNM-414 is hereby amended to: 1. Delete the function of the Regulatory Projects Coordinator, and 2. Alter the experience requirements for the function of Licensing and Nuclear Safety Specialist. Replacement pages for the license and condition section of the application are attached. Included are changes to License SNM-414 pages to reflect

25

Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First United States Nuclear Plant Site in Over 30 Years Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the...

26

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Energy Regulatory Commission Energy Regulatory Commission Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Name Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Address 888 First Street, N.E. Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20426 Phone number 1-866-208-3676 Website http://www.ferc.gov/contact-us Coordinates 38.90145°, -77.006248° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.90145,"lon":-77.006248,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

27

Regulatory Commission of Alaska | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Regulatory Commission of Alaska Regulatory Commission of Alaska Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Regulatory Commission of Alaska Name Regulatory Commission of Alaska Address 701 West Eight Ave., Suite 300 Place Anchorage, Alaska Zip 99501-3469 Phone number 907-276-6222 Website http://rca.alaska.gov/RCAWeb/h Coordinates 61.2143463°, -149.8931523° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":61.2143463,"lon":-149.8931523,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

28

Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentationgiven at the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Fall 2008 meetingcovers the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) strategic plan, the Federal Power Act (FPA), current energy security posture, and more.

29

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS MARCH 2012 CEC-400-2010-004-SD3, Article 9, Sections 1680 1685 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Martha Brook Program Senior Mechanical Engineer Justin Regnier Project Manager

30

NUCLEAR REGULATORY,.COMMISSION REGION I  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGULATORY,.COMMISSION REGULATORY,.COMMISSION REGION I lY,.COMMISSION 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KlNG OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 194061415 GION I NOALE ROAD ENNSYLVANlA 194061415 MAY I5 1996 MAY I5 1996 Docket No. 040-07964 License No. SlJ (Rs Heyman Properties Attention: Mr. John S. Russo Facility Manager 333 Post Road West Westport, CT 06881 SUBJECT: INSPECTION NO. 040-07964/96-001 Dear Mr. Russo: On April 15, 1996, Todd J. Jackson of this office conducted a routine inspection at 737 Canal Street, Stamford, Connecticut of activities o Oliver Incorporated, authorized by Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) Lit SUB-00967. The inspection consisted of observations by the inspect0 interviews with personnel, and a radiological survey by the inspector Jackson was accompanied on this inspection by representatives of the

31

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program … 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Evaluation Report Evaluation Report The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2013 OAS-M-14-01 October 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 23, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Evaluation Report on "The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2013" BACKGROUND The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is an independent agency within the Department of Energy (Department) responsible for, among other things, regulating the interstate

32

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2012, OAS-L-13-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 OAS-L-13-01 November 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 7, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Daniel M. Weeber Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Administration Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Evaluation Report on "The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2012" BACKGROUND The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is an independent agency within the Department of Energy responsible for, among other things, regulating interstate transmission of the Nation's electricity, natural gas and oil. In addition, the Commission licenses and inspects private, municipal and state hydroelectric projects. To achieve its mission, the Commission relies

33

Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit in Just One Month Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit...

34

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2011, OAS-M-12-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 OAS-M-12-01 November 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 15, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Evaluation Report on "The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2011" INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is an independent agency within the Department of Energy responsible for regulating the Nation's oil pipeline, natural gas, hydroelectric and wholesale electric industries. The Commission relies on a wide range of information technology (IT) resources in achieving its mission of assisting consumers in

35

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 18 CFR Chapter I (Docket No. RM05 Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Inquiry (NOI). SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory, the Commission is inviting comments on section 1233 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which defines native load

Laughlin, Robert B.

36

Staff Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Staff Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on the Bulk Power Markets In the United of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, any individual Commissioner, or the Commission itself Power Market, these investigations were directed by the Commission in an undocketed order issued on July

Laughlin, Robert B.

37

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 JAN 2 2 1982 -/ Departmznt'of Ene,rgy ATTN : Dr. William E. Mott, Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division (EP-32) Washington, D.C. 20545 Dear Dr. Mott: Enclosed is the list of contaminated'or potentially contaminated sites that I promised to send you during our recent meeting. The sites have been broken down into the followi,ng four categories: 1. Sites with known contamination that have never been 1 icensed. 2. Formerly licensed sites with known contamination. 3. Currently licensed sites that are being decontaminated prior to decoronissioning. 4. A list of formerly licensed sites that need to be visited to determine if they have been properly decontaminated prior to decommissioning.

38

Improvements needed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Inspector and Auditor  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report discusses the improvements needed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Inspector and Auditor. Also, we raise the possibility of Congress establishing an Office of Inspector General at the Commission. Such an office will ensure that the Congress and the Commissioners receive objective information on problems within the Commission and enhance public trust in the regulation of commercial nuclear power.

Not Available

1981-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

39

U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDE DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDS JUNE 1974 of the specified period the license may be either renewed or terminated by the Commission. Section 50 be decontaminated, as necessary, and inspected by the Commission to determine whether unrestricted access can

40

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (August 9, 2013) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects reviewed the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington's (Snohomish PUD) application for a 10-year license for the proposed Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project No. 12690, which would be located in Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, near the City of Port Townsend, in Island County, Washington, and has prepared a final environmental assessment (FEA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE/EA-1949). In the FEA, Commission staff analyzed the potential environmental effects of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (January 15, 2013) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects reviewed the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington's (Snohomish PUD) application for a 10-year pilot license for the proposed Admiralty Inlet Tidal Project No. 12690, which would be located in Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, near the City of Port Townsend, in Island County, Washington, and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE/EA-1949). In the EA, Commission staff analyzed the potential environmental effects of constructing and

42

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, such as fossil fuelbased power plants, and may ameliorate air quality problems and improve public health renewable energy resources, such as wind, solar, biomass, landfill gas, digester gas, geothermal, or smallCalifornia Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR ENFORCEMENT

43

Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Cooperation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Cooperation to Advance Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Cooperation to Advance Global Nuclear Energy Partnership July 17, 2007 - 2:55pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) expanded cooperation for President Bush's Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that was signed on Friday by DOE's GNEP Deputy Program Manager Paul Lisowski and NRC Executive Director for Operations Luis Reyes. The MOU establishes the foundation for increased cooperation between DOE and NRC on technological research and engineering studies and marks another important milestone

44

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2014 Financial...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 17, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and...

45

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WAWINQTON, 0. C....  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of technology, and the economics of improvements in relation to benefits to the public health and safety.' Surface Contamination The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Division of...

46

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Oregon NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (December 3, 2010) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC's application for license for the Reedsport OPT Wave Park Project (FERC Project No. 12713-002), which would be located in Oregon State territorial waters about 2.5 nautical miles off the coast near Reedsport, in Douglas County, Oregon. Staff prepared an environmental assessment (EA), which analyzes the potential environmental effects of licensing the project and concludes that licensing the project,

47

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Project No. 12711-005 Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Project No. 12711-005 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED COBSCOOK BAY TIDAL ENERGY PROJECT (January 4, 2012) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Ocean Renewable Power Company, LLC's application for an 8-year pilot license for the proposed Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Project (FERC Project No. 12711-005), which would be located in Cobscook Bay in Washington County, Maine, and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy

48

Work for Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Safety Related Applications  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Regulatory Nuclear Regulatory Commission Capabilities Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Overview Energy System Applications Safety-Related Applications Overview DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology Nuclear Regulatory Commission National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Homeland Security Applications Biomedical Applications Millimiter Wave Group Papers Other NPNS Capabilities Work with Argonne Contact us For Employees Site Map Help Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter NE on Flickr Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Safety Related Applications Bookmark and Share Nuclear Regulatory Commission International Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program Key objectives of the International Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program

49

Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit in Just One Month Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit in Just One Month March 27, 2007 - 12:10pm Addthis The Entergy Corporation's Grand Gulf Site in Mississippi Receives NRC Approval for an ESP WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today applauded the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) decision to approve an Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Entergy Corporation's Grand Gulf Nuclear Station in Mississippi. This approval, the second ESP this month, demonstrates another major milestone in President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative, which plans to expand the use of safe and clean nuclear power. Earlier this

50

Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First United States Nuclear Plant Site in Over 30 Years Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First United States Nuclear Plant Site in Over 30 Years March 8, 2007 - 10:28am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today commended the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's decision to approve the first-ever Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Exelon Generation Company's Clinton site, in central Illinois. This decision marks a major milestone in the President's plan to expand the use of safe and clean nuclear power. As part of President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative - which seeks to change the way we power this nation - nuclear power will play an increasingly

51

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC Docket No. PF13-4-000 Gulf LNG Energy, LLC Gulf LNG Pipelines, LLC NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME...

52

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service Comm'n ) ) POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S MOTION TO INTERVENE AND COMMENT IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY PETITION AND COMPLAINT Pursuant to Rules 211 and 214 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or the "Commission"), 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.211 and 385.214 (2004), Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") hereby moves to intervene in the above-captioned proceeding and supports the August 24, 2005 Emergency Petition and Complaint filed by the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DC PSC"). As discussed below, Mirant Corporation and its public utility subsidiaries (collectively, "Mirant")

53

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Pat Wood, III of Energy and Ancillary Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent System Operator-746-000 Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Sellers of Long Term Contracts

Laughlin, Robert B.

54

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cybersecurity...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

the Commission utilizes significant amounts of energy market data using a wide range of information technology resources. As attacks become more sophisticated and prevalent, the...

55

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2010 Financial Statement Audit  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2010 9, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN TO: IG-34 (A10FN002) SUBJECT: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2010 Financial Statement Audit Report No.: OAS-FS-11-02 TO: Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Fiscal Year 2010 balance sheet and the related statements of net cost, changes in net position, budgetary resources, and custodial activity. To fulfill the Office of Inspector General's audit responsibilities, we contracted with the independent public accounting firm of KPMG LLP (KPMG) to conduct the audit, subject to our review. KPMG is responsible for expressing an opinion on the

56

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service Comm'n ) ) POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER AND ANSWER TO COMMENTS AND PROTESTS Pursuant to Rules 212 and 213 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or the "Commission"), 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.212 and 385.213 (2005), Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") hereby (i) moves for leave to answer and (ii) answers certain of the comments and protests filed in the above-captioned proceeding. 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 On August 24, 2005, Mirant 3 shut down the Potomac River generating station in Alexandria, Virginia (the "Potomac River Plant" or the "Plant") without authority from any court

57

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

COMMISSION COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) July 19,2010 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 1 Docket No. 63-001-HLW 1 (High Level Waste Repository 1 Construction Authorization Application) ) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW Scott Blake Harris Donald P. Irwin Sean A. Lev Michael R. Shebelskie James Bennett McRae HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Riverfront Plaza, East Tower Office of General Counsel 95 1 East Byrd Street Department of Energy Richmond, Virginia 232 19-4074 1000 Independence Avenue, S. W. Washington, D.C. 20585 Counsel for the U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Page . . ........................................................................................................................ Table of Authorities

58

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, July 1987  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards (ALAB), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM).

Not Available

1987-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

59

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, October 1987  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards (ALAB), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM).

Not Available

1987-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

60

ORISE: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Radiation Exposure Information  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Information and Reporting System (REIRS) Information and Reporting System (REIRS) ORISE maintains large database of radiation exposure records for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Radiation Exposure Information and Reporting System (REIRS) The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is required by federal mandate to maintain and evaluate radiation protection data for workers at facilities that it licenses. As part of its mission of safety, the NRC operates the Radiation Exposure Information and Reporting System (REIRS), a database system containing all occupational radiation exposure records that have been submitted to the NRC under 10 CFR Part 20. REIRS encompasses 1,800-plus NRC licensees and contains more than five million records for more than one million monitored individuals.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

KWOC (Key-Word-Out-of-Context) Index of US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide Series  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To meet the objectives of the program funded by the Department of Energy (DOE)-Nuclear Energy (NE) Technology Support Programs, the Performance Assurance Project Office (PAPO) administers a Performance Assurance Information Program that collects, compiles, and distributes program-related information, reports, and publications for the benefit of the DOE-NE program participants. THE KWOC Index of US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide Series'' is prepared as an aid in searching for specific topics in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide Series.

Jennings, S.D.

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

62

Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Alton Strategic Environmental Group Alton Strategic Environmental Group New Port Richey, FL charles.alton@earthlink.net April 4, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Assistant General Counsel Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Dear Mr. Cohen: I have reviewed the Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued

63

Chapter 2 of the Wyoming Public Service Commission Regulations...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

the Wyoming Public Service Commission Regulations: General Regulations Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation:...

64

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, January--March 1997  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides digests and indexes for issuances of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, the Administrative Law Judges, the Directors Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking. These indexes and digests are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

NONE

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

65

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T of Energy and Ancillary Services Investigation of the Practices of the California Independent System of Electric and Natural Gas Prices Enron Power Marketing, Inc. and Enron Energy Services, Inc. Enron Power

Laughlin, Robert B.

66

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T Company v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services Investigation of Practices of the California Independent System Operator and the California Power Exchange Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. Sellers of Energy

Laughlin, Robert B.

67

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T Company v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent.; Avista Energy, Inc.(Avista); Calpine Energy Services, L.P. (Calpine); El Paso Marketing, LP (f/k/a El

Laughlin, Robert B.

68

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T 18 C.F.R. § 385.602 (2006). 4 The Settlement defines the Western Energy Markets as those markets Company v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services Investigation of Practices of the California

Laughlin, Robert B.

69

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 105 FERC ¶ 61,008 Before Commissioners: Pat Wood, III, Chairman; William L. Massey, and Nora Mead Brownell. Reliant Energy Services, Inc. Docket Nos. EL03-59-000 Reliant Energy Coolwater, Inc. IN03-10-000 Reliant Energy Ellwood, Inc. PA02

Laughlin, Robert B.

70

Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory...

71

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

BEFORE THE BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service ) Commission ) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER AND ANSWER OF POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY Pursuant to Rule 213 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.213, Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") hereby moves for leave to answer and answers the Motion for Leave to File Consolidated Answer and Consolidated Answer of Robert G. Burnley, Director of the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality filed on November 10, 2005 ("VDEQ Answer"). For the reasons detailed below, Pepco requests that the Commission reject VDEQ's Answer, or in the alternative, if the

72

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Trunkline LNG Company, LLC Docket No. PF12-8-000 Trunkline LNG Export, LLC Trunkline Gas Company, LLC SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PLANNED LAKE CHARLES LIQUEFACTION PROJECT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES (March 21, 2013) As previously noticed on September 14, 2012, and supplemented herein, the staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) that will discuss the environmental impacts of the Lake Charles Liquefaction Project involving construction and operation of facilities by Trunkline LNG Company, LLC; Trunkline LNG Export, LLC; and Trunkline Gas

73

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances: February 1995. Volume 41, Number 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This book contains an issuance of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and a Director`s Decision. The issuance concerns consideration by the Commission of appeals from both the Initial Decision and a Reconsideration Order issued by the Presiding Officer involving two materials license amendment applications filed by the University of Missouri. The Director`s Decision from the Office of Enforcement denies petitions filed by Northeast Utilities employees requesting that accelerated enforcement action be taken against Northeast Utilities for activities concerned with NU`s fitness-for-duty program.

NONE

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

74

Chapter 9 of the Wyoming Public Service Commission Regulations...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wyoming Public Service Commission Regulations: General Forms Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Chapter 9 of...

75

Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 Federal Register 8 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. ER10-507-000] ERA MA, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization January 7, 2010. This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of ERA MA, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

76

Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

33 Federal Register 33 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. RM98-1-000] Records Governing Off-the Record Communications Public Notice This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications. Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any oral communication. Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional file

77

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cameron LNG, LLC and Cameron LNG, LLC and Docket Nos. CP13-25-000 Cameron Interstate, LLC CP13-27-000 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CAMERON LIQUEFACTION PROJECT (January 10, 2014) The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has prepared a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Cameron Liquefaction Project (Project), proposed by Cameron LNG, LLC and Cameron Interstate Pipeline, LLC (collectively Cameron) in the above-referenced docket. Cameron requests authorization to export 12 million tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) per year from its terminal in Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana. The draft EIS assesses the potential environmental effects of the construction and

78

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NRC's NRC's Integrated Strategy for NRC s Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management Earl Easton 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 25, 2010 Road to Yucca Mountain * 20+ years of preparation for the licensing i review * DOE application received in June 2008 and accepted for review in September 2008 * President Obama pursues alternatives to Yucca Mountain * DOE motion to withdraw in March 2010 2 * DOE motion to withdraw in March 2010 * Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future 2 Growing Spent Fuel Inventory Cumulative Used Nuclear Fuel Scenarios 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 Metric Tons 3 - 50,000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Year Reference: Crozat, March 2010 Integrated Strategy * In response to the evolving national debate on spent fuel management strategy, NRC initiated a number of actions:

79

Mr. John Kinneman, Chief Nuclear Materfals Branch Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

111989 111989 Mr. John Kinneman, Chief Nuclear Materfals Branch Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia. Pennsylvania 19406 Dear Mr. Kinneman: -;' .-. 'W Enclosed are the copfes of the final ORNL survey reports on the radiologlcal Surveys conducted on three Teterboro, New Jersey properties; Metpath Incorporated, Allied Aerospace Corporatio; and Sumftomo Machinery Corporation. Copies of these reports have &en sent directly to the owners by our survey contractor Oak Ridge National Laboratory. If you have any questions regardfng these reports. please call me at (301) 353-5439. Sfncerely, Enclosure : < I j i Andrew Wallo III, Designation and Certffication Manager Dfvisfon 01 Facility and Site Oeconanlssionfng Projects

80

Re: Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations Re: Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations Comments from Edison Electric Institute on DOE's...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff practice and procedure digest  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Revision 9 of the fifth edition of the NRC Staff Practice and Procedure Digest contains a digest of a number of Commission, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board, and Atomic Safety and Licensing Board decisions issued during the period from July 1, 1972 to September 30, 1990 interpreting the NRC's Rules of Practice in 10 CFR Part 2. This Revision 9 replaces in part earlier editions and revisions and includes appropriate changes reflecting the amendments to the Rules of Practice effective through September 30, 1990. This edition of the Digest was prepared by attorneys from Aspen Systems Corporation pursuant to Contract number 18-89-346. Persons using this Digest are placed on notice that it may not be used as an authoritative citation in support of any position before the Commission or any of its adjudicatory tribunals. Persons using this Digest are also placed on notice that it is intended for use only as an initial research tool, that it may, and likely does, contain errors, including errors in analysis and interpretation of decisions, and that the user should not rely on the Digest analyses and interpretations but must read, analyze and rely on the user's own analysis of the actual Commission, Appeal Board and Licensing Board decisions cited. Further, neither the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Aspen Systems Corporation, nor any of their employees makes any expressed or implied warranty or assumes liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any material presented in the Digest. The Digest is roughly structured in accordance with the chronological sequence of the nuclear facility licensing process as set forth in Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 2. Those decisions which did not fit into that structure are dealt with in a section on general matters. Where appropriate, particular decisions are indexed under more than one heading. (JF)

Not Available

1991-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

82

Transportation Security Rulemaking Activities at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AT THE AT THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION R. Clyde Ragland, P.E. Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response 2011 DOE National Transportation Stakeholders Forum May 11, 2011 2 NRC Focus Prior to September 11, 2001 * Historically, NRC Transportation Security Regulations Focused on Highest Risk Radioactive Material, consisted of Special Nuclear Material (SNM) and Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) NRC Actions Since September 11, 2001 * Domestically, reviewed materials transported by NRC licensees and re- evaluated security requirements considering: - applicable threats to shipments - material considerations - magnitude of adverse consequences * Internationally, participated in the development of the IAEA Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive

83

Report on the establishment and operation of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Daycare Center  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

We have completed an inspection of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) Daycare Center (Center). The purpose of the inspection was to review for efficiency, economy and compliance with laws and regulations, FERC's establishment and operation of the Center. The inspection objectives were to review: (1) FERC's compliance with Federal laws and requirements of the General Services Administration and the District of Columbia; (2) the source and amount of funds for establishing and operating the Center; and (3) the organizational relationships between FERC, the Center and the contractor operating the Center.

Not Available

1991-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

84

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 FERC ¶ 62,213 4 FERC ¶ 62,213 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION United States Department of Energy Docket No. EF13-5-000 Western Area Power Administration Washoe Project, Stampede Division ORDER CONFIRMING AND APPROVING RATE SCHEDULE ON A FINAL BASIS ( September 5, 2013 ) Summary: On April 24, 2013, the Deputy Secretary of Energy (Deputy Secretary) filed a request for final confirmation and approval of Western Area Power Administration's (Western) Rate Schedule SNF-7, for a non-firm power formula rate applicable to the Washoe Project, Stampede Division (Washoe Project). 1 The Deputy Secretary placed the rates into effect on an interim basis effective August 1, 2013, 2 and requests final confirmation and approval of the rates for the period

85

Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18 Federal Register 18 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 14147-000] Storage Development Partners, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing Applications On April 1, 2011, Storage Development Partners, LLC, filed an application for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the Camp Pendleton Project (project) to be located at Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base, in San Diego County, California. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application

86

Chapter 1 of the Wyoming Public Service Commission Regulations...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

of the Wyoming Public Service Commission Regulations: Rules of Practice and Procedure Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document-...

87

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input. Comments relevant to the following two sections of the RFI: "Long Term Issues: Managing a Grid with High Penetration of New Technologies" and "Reliability and Cyber-Security," US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Progress Energy draft regarding Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and

88

Natural Gas Regulation - Delaware Public Service Commission (Delaware) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Natural Gas Regulation - Delaware Public Service Commission Natural Gas Regulation - Delaware Public Service Commission (Delaware) Natural Gas Regulation - Delaware Public Service Commission (Delaware) < Back Eligibility Utility Investor-Owned Utility State/Provincial Govt Industrial Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Fuel Distributor Program Info State Delaware Program Type Generating Facility Rate-Making Provider Delaware Public Service Commission The Delaware Public Service Commission regulates only the distribution of natural gas to Delaware consumers. The delivery and administrative costs associated with natural gas distribution are determined in base rate proceedings before the Commission. The recovery of costs associated with the natural gas used by customers is determined annually as part of fuel adjustment proceedings. As a result of this process, rates for natural gas

89

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, July-December 1997  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, the Administrative Law Judges, the Directors` Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking are presented in this document. These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances. Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are: Case name (owner(s) of facility); Full text reference (volume and pagination); Issuance number Issues raised by appellants; Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes); Name of facility, Docket number; Subject matter of issues and/or rulings; Type of hearing (operating license, operating license amendment, etc); Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.). These information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats: Case Name Index, Headers and Digests, Legal Citations Index, Subject Index, and Facility Index.

NONE

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design A report on an independent study to assess various potential impacts of the proposed rulemaking by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), "Remedying Undue Discrimination through Open Access Transmission Service and Standard Electricity Market Design." Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design More Documents & Publications Electric System Decision Making in Other Regions: A Preliminary Analysis Prepared for Western Interstate Energy Board Committee on Regional Electric

91

Oil and Gas Commission General Rules and Regulations (Arkansas) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commission General Rules and Regulations (Arkansas) Commission General Rules and Regulations (Arkansas) Oil and Gas Commission General Rules and Regulations (Arkansas) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Municipal/Public Utility Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Utility Program Info State Arkansas Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Department of Natural Resources The Oil and Gas Commission General Rules and Regulations are the body of rules and regulations that relate to natural gas production in Arkansas. The statutory law is found Arkansas Code Annotated Title 15 chapter 72. Contained in this summary are the rules and regulations most relevant to

92

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit, OAS-FS-13-03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Energy Regulatory Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-13-03 November 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 15, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of net costs, changes in net position, budgetary

93

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." August 1, 2011 - 1:59pm Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." Addthis Related Articles Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response DOE and FERC Joint Public Statement on Back Stop Siting

94

Improvements needed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Inspector and Auditor. Report to the Congress  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To help the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) carry out its responsibilities, a special office of Inspector and Auditor was created in April 1975 to independently review and appraise all NRC operations. This office, in essence, was to provide the Commissioners with oversight over NRC programs and activities and recommend corrective actions. GAO found that the Office of Inspector and Auditor has not been using proven management techniques in scheduling and carrying out its work. These techniques range from systematic planning and prioritization to timely and consistent followup on work. If such techniques were used, it would result in a more orderly management approach and lead to higher quality reports and a better use of staff resources. The independence of the Office of Inspector and Auditor needs to be strengthened. In GAO's view, this only may be possible if NRC accepts and implements the recommendations contained in this report. GAO also suggests that Congress consider establishing a statutory Inspector General office at the NRC. Such an office could help ensure that the Congress and the Commissioners receive objective information on problems within the Commission and enhance public trust in the regulation of commercial nuclear power.

Not Available

1981-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

95

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances: Volume 46, Number 6  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ), the Directors` Decision (DD), and the Decision on Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM). The summaries and headnotes preceding the opinions reported herein are not to be deemed a part of those opinions or have any independent legal significance.

NONE

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, January--March 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This publication is the 1st quarter 1996 index to issuances by the US NRC. These include issuances by the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, the Administrative Law Judges, the Directors` Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking.

NONE

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

97

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances. Volume 46, Number 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ), the Directors` Decisions (DD), and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM). The summaries and headnotes preceding the opinions reported herein are not to be deemed a part of those opinions or have any independent legal significance.

NONE

1997-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission organization charts and functional statements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the organizational chart for the US NRC. It contains organizational structure and functional statements for the following: (1) the Commission, (2) committees and boards, (3) staff offices, (4) office of the Inspector General, (5) executive director for operations, (6) program offices, and (7) regional offices.

NONE

1996-08-19T23:59:59.000Z

99

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certifies HalfPACT Transportation Container  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certifies U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certifies HalfPACT Transportation Container CARLSBAD, N.M., November 20, 2000 - The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Certificate of Compliance November 2 for the HalfPACT transportation container. The HalfPACT will be used to supplement the Transuranic Package Transporter Model 2 (TRUPACT-II) for transportation of waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The TRUPACT-II is currently used for transportation of waste to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The new container is approximately 30 inches shorter than the TRUPACT-II. The HalfPACT is designed to carry seven 55-gallon drums weighing up to 1,000 pounds each, but is also capable of carrying one standard waste box or four 85-gallon drums.

100

File:Federal Hydropower - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.pdf | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Federal Hydropower - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.pdf Federal Hydropower - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Metadata File:Federal Hydropower - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Go to page 1 2 Go! next page → next page → Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 740 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 2 pages) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 15:32, 22 May 2013 Thumbnail for version as of 15:32, 22 May 2013 1,275 × 1,650, 2 pages (740 KB) Graham7781 (Talk | contribs) You cannot overwrite this file. Edit this file using an external application (See the setup

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances: Opinions and decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with selected orders, July 1--December 31, 1996. Volume 44, Pages 1--432  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a six-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly softbounds and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition. Cross references in the text and indexes are to the NRCI page numbers which are the same as the page numbers in this publication. Issuances are referred to as follows: Commission--CLI, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards--LBP, Administrative Law Judges--ALJ, Directors` Decisions--DD, and Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking--DPRM.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances. Opinions and decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with selected orders, July 1, 1990--December 31, 1990: Volume 32  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This thirty-second volume of issuances (1--496) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and Administrative Law Judges it covers the period from July 1, 1990 to December 31, 1990. The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a six-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly softbounds and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition. Cross references in the text and indexes are to the NRCI page numbers which are the same as the page numbers in this publication. Issuances are referred to as follows: Commission--CLI, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards--ALAB, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards--LBP, Administrative Law Judges--ALJ, Directors`Decisions--DD, and Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking--DPRM. Specific facilities discussed are: Carroll County Nuclear Station; Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station; Perry Nuclear Power Plant; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Stations; Seabrook Station; Shoreham Nuclear Generating Plant; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant.

Not Available

1990-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

103

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances, January 1996--June 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, The Administrative Law Judges, the Director`s Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking are presented in this document. The digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances. Information elements common the cases hear and ruled upon are displayed in one or more of five formats: case name index, headers and digests, legal citations index, subject index, and facility index.

NONE

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

California Energy Commission REVISED DRAFT REGULATIONS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

OFFICE Panama Bartholomy Deputy Director EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY DIVISION Robert Oglesby Nonresidential Building Energy Use Disclosure Program Draft Regulations Title 20, Division 2, Chapter 4 Performance Buildings Bill Pennington Office Manager HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDINGS AND STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT

105

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, Volume 46, No. 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report includes the issuances received in October 1997. Issuances are from the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and the Directors` Decisions. Five issuances were received on the following subjects: (1) decontamination and decommissioning funding for Sequoyah Fuels Corporation and General Atomics; (2) involvement in NRC-licensed activities by Aharon Ben-Haim; (3) Barnett Industrial X-Ray, Inc.; (4) spent fuel storage installation at Northern States Power Company; and (5) Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. No issuances were received from the the Administrative Law Judges or the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, Volume 44, No. 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report includes the issuances received in October 1996. Issuances are from the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and the Directors` Decisions. 15 issuances were received and are abstracted individually in the database: Louisiana Energy Services, U.S. Enrichment Corporation, Yankee Atomic Electric Company, General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation, James L. Shelton, Juan Guzman, Northern States Power Company, TESTCO Inc., Washington Public Power Supply System, all nuclear plants, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Duke Power Company, Florida Power Corporation, and Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (2 issuances). No issuances were received from the the Administrative Law Judges or the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking.

NONE

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Leased Warehouse Space, CR-B-96-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AUDIT OF THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LEASED WAREHOUSE SPACE The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet 5 to 7 days after publication at the following alternative addresses:

108

Energy Department Issues Draft Request For Proposal for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensed Facilities Procurement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Cincinnati The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Draft Request for Proposal (DRFP) for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Licensed Facilities procurement. The NRC Licensed Facilities procurement is one of the four procurements that resulted from the Idaho Site Office of Environmental Management Post FY 2015 Acquisition Planning.

109

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit, OAS-FS-12-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-12-01 November 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 15, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) Fiscal Year 2011 balance sheet and the related statements of net cost, changes in net position, budgetary resources, and custodial activity.

110

Commissioner George Apostolakis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(Reactors) · Study the system as an integrated socio- technical system · Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA Enrichment Power Reactors Transportation Storage Waste Disposal Uranium Conversion Medical/Industrial #12;The Traditional Approach to Regulation (Before Risk Assessment) · Management of uncertainty (unquantified

Bernstein, Joseph B.

111

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances. Opinions and decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with selected orders, July 1, 1994--December 31, 1994. Volume 40, Pages 1--387  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a six-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly softbounds and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition. Cross references in the text and indexes are to the NRCI page numbers which are the same as the page numbers in this publication. This book covers the following: issuances of the NRC; issuances of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards; and issuances of Directors` decisions.

NONE

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

112

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Project Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides an evaluation of the Project Plan. The Project Plan is intended to provide the high-level direction that documents the required software activities to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Carl Wharton; Kent Norris

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Project Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides an evaluation of the Project Plan. The Project Plan is intended to provide the high-level direction that documents the required software activities to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Carl Wharton

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Project Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides an evaluation of the Project Plan. The Project Plan is intended to provide the high-level direction that documents the required software activities to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Carl Wharton; Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

The European Commission's light bulb decree: Another costly regulation?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Since September 2009, Regulation 244/2009 of the European Commission enforces the gradual phase-out of incandescent light bulbs. As of September 2012, only energy-efficient lighting sources will be allowed for sale. Among these are halogen light bulbs, light-emitting diodes (LED), or compact fluorescent light bulbsoften referred to as energy-saving light bulbs. The Commission's justification for the phase-out of conventional light bulbs maintains that a reduction in the electricity consumed will not only lead to lower energy cost for private households and industrial consumers, but at the same time lead to a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. This article discusses possible reasons for the slow market diffusion of energy-saving light bulbs and shows that the investment in energy-efficient light bulbs does not necessarily lead to significant cost reductions. Drawing on some illustrative examples, we demonstrate that the use of cheaper incandescent bulbs instead of energy-saving light bulbs can be economically rational in cases of rather low usage times, in which the higher initial purchasing price might only pay off after very long time spans. Furthermore, due to the coexistence with the European Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), this regulation attains no additional emission reductions beyond those achieved by the ETS alone. We thus conclude that the general ban of incandescent light bulbs is inappropriate and should be abolished by the Commission.

Manuel Frondel; Steffen Lohmann

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

DOE Review of Regulations- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any...

117

NMAC 1.2.2 Public Regulations Commission Rules of Procedure ...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

.2 Public Regulations Commission Rules of Procedure Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: NMAC 1.2.2 Public...

118

1 NMAC 2.2 - Public Regulation Commission Rules of Procedure...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

NMAC 2.2 - Public Regulation Commission Rules of Procedure Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: 1 NMAC 2.2 -...

119

The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States Department Of Energy Public Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 The UNITED STATES 3 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and 4 the UNITED STATES 5 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 6 7 PUBLIC MEETING 8 9 DISCUSSION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 3116 OF 10 THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 11 12 Commencing at 9:10 a.m., November 16, 2006 13 at the L'Enfant Plaza Hotel 14 480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW 15 Washington DC 20024 16 17 Public meeting organized by: 18 Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International, Inc. 19 20010 Century Boulevard, Suite 500 20 Germantown, Maryland 20874 21 (301) 972-4430 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. CAMERON: Good morning everyone. My name is Chip Cameron. I'm an assistant general counsel in the office of General Counsel at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. And I would like to

120

Special committee review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's severe accident risks report (NUREG--1150)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In April 1989, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) published a draft report Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five US Nuclear Power Plants,'' NUREG-1150. This report updated, extended and improved upon the information presented in the 1974 Reactor Safety Study,'' WASH-1400. Because the information in NUREG-1150 will play a significant role in implementing the NRC's Severe Accident Policy, its quality and credibility are of critical importance. Accordingly, the Commission requested that the RES conduct a peer review of NUREG-1150 to ensure that the methods, safety insights and conclusions presented are appropriate and adequately reflect the current state of knowledge with respect to reactor safety. To this end, RES formed a special committee in June of 1989 under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The Committee, composed of a group of recognized national and international experts in nuclear reactor safety, was charged with preparing a report reflecting their review of NUREG-1150 with respect to the adequacy of the methods, data, analysis and conclusions it set forth. The report which precedes reflects the results of this peer review.

Kouts, H.J.C. (Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (USA)); Apostolakis, G.; Kastenberg, W.E. (California Univ., Los Angeles, CA (USA)); Birkhofer, E.H.A. (Gesellschaft fuer Reaktorsicherheit mbH (GRS), Koeln (Germany, F.R.)); Hoegberg, L.G. (Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm (Sweden)); LeSage, L.G. (Argonne National Lab., IL (USA)); Rasmussen, N.C. (Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Camb

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

September 10, 2003, Board Public Meeting - Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approach to Oversight  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 25 63 carefully, also. In fact, I would like to put in the r e c o r d at this point a letter that the Board sent to Admiral Bowman complimenting him on those reports , because we find them very helpful. Thank you. Any other questions? DR. MANSFIELD: I second that: especially the radiological safety reports and environmental reports. CHAIFWAN CONWAY: Yes , very important , and we thank you. We thank you for your assistance here today . Thank you very much. Now we have the experienced representatives from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Ms. Cynthia Carpenter and Dr. Edwin Hackett. If you would each introduce yourselves for the record. MS. CARPENTER: Good morning. My name is Cynthia Carpenter. I'm the Deputy Director of the Division of Inspection Program Management from the

122

Report to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, 1986  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) is devoted to the activities performed during calendar year 1986. Comments and observations are provided on operating experience at nuclear power plants and other NRC licensees, including results from selected AEOD studies; summaries of abnormal occurrences involving US nuclear plants; reviews of licensee event reports and their quality, reactor scram experience from 1984 to 1986, engineered safety features actuations, and the trends and patterns analysis program; and assessments of nonreactor and medical misadministration events. In addition, the report provides the year-end status of all recommendations included in AEOD studies, and listings of all AEOD reports issued from 1980 through 1986.

none,

1987-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Site-specific parameter values for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's food pathway dose model  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Routine operations at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in Western South Carolina result in radionuclide releases to the atmosphere and to the Savannah River. The resulting radiation doses to the off-site maximum individual and the off-site population within 80 km of the SRS are estimated on a yearly basis. These estimates are currently generated using dose models prescribed for the commercial nuclear power industry by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC provides default values for dose-model parameters for facilities without resources to develop site-specific values. A survey of land- and water-use characteristics for the Savannah River area has been conducted to determine site-specific values for water recreation, consumption, and agricultural parameters used in the NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 (1977) dosimetric models. These site parameters include local characteristics of meat, milk, and vegetable production; recreational and commercial activities on the Savannah River; and meat, milk, vegetable, and seafood consumption rates. This paper describes how parameter data were obtained at the Savannah River Site and the impacts of such data on off-site dose. Dose estimates using site-specific parameter values are compared to estimates using the NRC default values.

Hamby, D.M. (Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC (United States))

1992-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Risk Management Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides an evaluation of the risk management. Risk management is intended to ensure a methodology for conducting risk management planning, identification, analysis, responses, and monitoring and control activities associated with the SAPHIRE project work, and to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kent Norris

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

125

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, July--December 1996. Volume 44, Index 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ), the Directors` Decisions (DD), and the Decision on Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM) are presented in this document. These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances. Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are: case name (owner(s) of facility); full text reference (volume and pagination); issuance number; issues raised by apellants; legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes); name of facility, docket number; subject matter of issues and/or rulings; type of hearing (operating license, operating license amendment, etc.); type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).

NONE

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Oil and Gas Commission General Rules and Regulations Continued(Arkansas) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oil and Gas Commission General Rules and Regulations Oil and Gas Commission General Rules and Regulations Continued(Arkansas) Oil and Gas Commission General Rules and Regulations Continued(Arkansas) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Municipal/Public Utility Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Utility Program Info State Arkansas Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Department of Natural Resources The General Rules have been adopted by the Oil and Gas Commission in accordance with applicable state law requirements and are General Rules of state-wide application, applying to the conservation and prevention of waste of crude oil and natural gas in the State of Arkansas and protection

127

Learning subgroup-specific regulatory interactions and regulator independence with PARADIGM  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Learning subgroup-specific regulatory interactions and regulator...with a product of independent regulatory factors, and the number of...the bootstrap. J. Stat. Plan. Inference (2003) 117...knowledge in cancer genomics: a review of existing computational approaches......

Andrew J. Sedgewick; Stephen C. Benz; Shahrooz Rabizadeh; Patrick Soon-Shiong; Charles J. Vaske

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Regulatory analysis for amendments to regulations for the environmental review for renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This regulatory analysis provides the supporting information for a proposed rule that will amend the Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s environmental review requirements for applications for renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses. The objective of the proposed rulemaking is to improve regulatory efficiency by providing for the generic evaluation of certain environmental impacts associated with nuclear plant license renewal. After considering various options, the staff identified and analyzed two major alternatives. With Alternative A, the existing regulations would not be amended. This option requires that environmental reviews be performed under the existing regulations. Alternative B is to assess, on a generic basis, the environmental impacts of renewing the operating license of individual nuclear power plants, and define the issues that will need to be further analyzed on a case-by-case basis. In addition, Alternative B removes from NRC`s review certain economics-related issues. The findings of this assessment are to be codified in 10 CFR 51. The staff has selected Alternative B as the preferred alternative.

NONE

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

The Paradox of Regulatory Development in China: The Case of the Electricity Industry  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

zhongguo dianli chanye (Chinas Electricity Industry at themulti_page.pdf. State Electricity Regulatory Commission.The Annual Report on Electricity Regulation (2006). Beijing:

Tsai, Chung-min

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Regulatory Roadmap Workshop for Federal Bulk Transmission Regulations...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Regulatory Roadmapping Pgower's picture Submitted by Pgower(45) Member 7 August, 2014 - 13:19 One-day workshop to review regulatory roadmaps for bulk transmission. Date:...

131

USING TECHNOLOGY TO SUPPORT PROACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF MATERIALS DEGRADATION FOR THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The majority of the U.S. reactor fleet is applying for license renewal to extend the operating life from the current 40 years to 60 years, and there is now active interest in extending the operating life to beyond 60 years. Many plants are also applying for increases in power rating and both of these changes increases the need for an improved understanding of materials degradation. Many materials degrade over time and much is known about the degradation of materials under normal environmental conditions; however, less is known about the characteristics of materials degradation when the environment is subject to higher than normal radiological conditions over extended periods of time. Significant efforts are being made by industrial, academic and regulatory groups worldwide to identify, classify and mitigate potential problems arising from degradation of components in this context. From a regulatory perspective, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) is very interested in being able to identify ways to insure their licensees proactively manage the identification of materials degradation and the mitigation of its effects. To date, the USNRC has consolidated generic programs for mitigating aging issues in the two volume Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report (NUREG-1801) [1][2], and have encouraged applicants for license renewal to use these programs where applicable in their plant when applying for renew of their reactors license. The USNRC has also published a comprehensive report entitled Expert Panel Report on Proactive Materials Degradation (NUREG/CR-6923) [3] that inventories the types of degradation mechanisms that could exist in each component of a Light Water Reactor (LWR) and each degradation mechanism is assessed regarding how much is known about mitigating its effects. Since the number of plant designs and materials used varies greatly within the U.S. fleet, there are many variations to implementing aging management programs (AMPs), requiring significant dialogs between the Licensee and the USNRC. These discussions are part of the licensing basis and as such are documented with up to multi-hundred page responses that are loosely coupled through the USNRC Agency-wide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which serves as an electronic records repository for the USNRC . These discussions have supported revisions to the GALL, including the revision that is being prepared as this paper is being written. The USNRC has sought the help of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to improve the staffs ability to navigate the significant numbers of documents that are generated in this process and to provide a forum for regulators, licensees and researchers to share knowledge in the efforts to improve the cyclic process for defining, applying, validating and re-defining AMPs. Work to date in this area is publicly accessible and this paper will describe that work and outline a potential path forward. The presenter will also demonstrate the capabilities of the PMMD information tools (http://pmmd.pnl.gov).

Taylor, W Boyd; Knobbs, Katherine J.; Carpenter, C. E. (Gene) [Gene; Malik, Shah

2010-07-19T23:59:59.000Z

132

South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project : Adopted Portions of a 1987 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission`s Final Environmental Impact Statement.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project that world produce 6.55 average megawatts of firm energy per year and would be sited in the Snohomish River Basin, Washington, was evaluated by the Federal Energy Regulatory commission (FERC) along with six other proposed projects for environmental effects and economic feasibility Based on its economic analysis and environmental evaluation of the project, the FERC staff found that the South Fork Tolt River Project would be economically feasible and would result in insignificant Impacts if sedimentation issues could be resolved. Upon review, the BPA is adopting portions of the 1987 FERC FEIS that concern the South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project and updating specific sections in an Attachment.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

Study of the impacts of regulations affecting the acceptance of Integrated Community Energy Systems: public utility, energy facility siting and municipal franchising regulatory programs in Florida. Preliminary background report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The authority to regulate public utilities is vested generally in the Florida Public Service Commission. The Commission is comprised of five members appointed by the governor with the approval of the senate. The governor must choose his appointees from a list of persons recommended by the nine-person Florida Public Service Commission Nominating Council. Commissioners serve either three- or four-year terms. They must be free from any employment or pecuniary interests in any utility subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. Within the purview of its powers, the authority of the Commission supersedes that of local governments. Public utility regulatory statutes, energy facility siting programs, and municipal franchising authority are examined to identify how they may impact on the ability of an organization, whether or not it be a regulated utility, to construct and operate an ICES.

Feurer, D.A.; Weaver, C.L.; Gallagher, K.C.; Hejna, D.; Rielley, K.J.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

Report to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission on analysis and evaluation of operational data - 1987: Power reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) is devoted to the activities performed during 1987. The report is published in two volumes. NUREG-1272, Vol. 2, No. 1, covers Power Reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry, with comments regarding the trends of some key performance measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year, and summarizes information from Licensee Event Reports, the NRC's Operations Center, and Diagnostic Evaluations. NUREG-1272, Vol. 2, No. 2, covers Nonreactors and presents a review of the nonreactors events and misadministration reports that were reported in 1987 and a brief synopsis of AEOD studies published in 1987. Each volume contains a list of the AEOD Reports issued for 1980-1987.

none,

1988-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

135

EMI/RFI and Power Surge Withstand Guidance for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper discusses the regulatory guidance implemented by U.S. NRC for minimizing malfunctions and upsets in safety-related instrumentation and control (I and C) systems in nuclear power plants caused by electromagnetic interference (EMI), radio-frequency interference (RFI), and power surges. The engineering design, installation, and testing practices deemed acceptable to U.S. NRC are described in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.180, ''Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic and Radio-Frequency in Safety-Related Instrumentation and Control Systems'' (January 2000) and in a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) endorsing EPRI TR-102323, ''Guidelines for Electromagnetic Interference Testing in Power Plants,'' (April 1996). These engineering practices provide a well-established, systematic approach for ensuring electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and surge withstand capability (SWC).

Ewing, PD

2001-09-07T23:59:59.000Z

136

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Interconnection Queue Practices Technical Conference December 11, 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Electric Transmission Congestion Study National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Workshop December 8, 2011 Hilton St. Louis Airport, 10330 Natural Bridge Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63134 Presented by: Jerry Lein Public Utility Analyst North Dakota Public Service Commission Phone: 701 328-1035 Fax: 701 328-2410 jlein@nd.gov Overview * ND Electric Energy Resources * Need for New Transmission - Interconnection Difficulties - Transmission Constraints * Regional Transmission Projects Update * Capacity Deliverability between RTOs ND Electric Energy Resources * ND Ranked #1 in U.S. for Wind Energy Potential - 1991 Pacific Northwest Labs study found ND Wind could potentially supply 36% of U.S. electric energy consumption. -

137

Regulatory Takings and Environmental Regulation in NAFTA's Chapter 11  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for regulation is known only after the investment is sunk. The ex- istence of sunk costs combined with the fact

Karp, Larry S.

138

Study of the impacts of regulations affecting the acceptance of Integrated Community Energy Systems: public utility, energy facility siting and municipal franchising regulatory programs in Pennsylvania. Preliminary background report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The authority to regulate public utilities is generally vested in the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. The Commission is comprised of five members appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the senate. Commission members are appointed for 10 year terms. They must be free from any employment which is incompatible with the duties of the Commission, and are subject to a statutory code of ethics. The Commission is charged with responsibility for enforcing the Public Utility Law. Within the purview of its powers, the authority of the Commission supersedes that of local governments. The Commission, for example, may grant exemptions from local zoning requirements, and has approving authority over privileges or franchises granted by municipalities to public utilities. The Commission, however, has no authority over municipally owned utilities operating within municipal boundaries. Public utility regulatory statutes, energy facility siting programs, and municipal franchising authority are examined to identify how they may impact on the ability of an organization, whether or not it be a regulated utility, to construct and operate an ICES.

Feurer, D.A.; Weaver, C.L.; Gallagher, K.C.; Hejna, D.; Rielley, K.J.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

Automobile safety regulation : technological change and regulatory process  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This report examines the history of automobile safety regulation since 1966, viewed as an attempt to substitute public decisions on the design of new automobiles for private decisions. The focus of the

Lorang, Philip Alphonse

140

Effective Regulatory Institutions: The Regulator's Role in the...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

may be regarded by others, and (3) the issue of independence of regulation from undue political intervention. LEDSGP green logo.png This tool is included in the Transportation...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Opinions and decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with selected orders, July 1, 1995--December 31, 1995. Volume 42, Pages 1-258  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the 42nd volume of issuances of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and its Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, Administrative Law Judges, and Office Directors. This book is a reprinting, containing corrections of numerous printing errors in a previously distributed book. It covers the period from July 1, 1995 to December 31, 1995. Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards conduct adjudicatory hearings on applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants and related facilities, and issue initial decisions which, subject to internal review and appellate procedures, become the final Commission action with respect to those applications. The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a 6-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly editions and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition.

NONE

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

142

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the March 1996 listing of NRC issuances. Included are: (1) NRC orders granting Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company`s petition for review of the ASLB order LBP-95-17, (2) NRC orders relating to the potential disqualification of two commissioners in the matter of the decommissioning of Yankee Nuclear Power Station, (3) ASLB orders pertaining to the Oncology Services Corporation, (4) ASLB orders pertaining to the Radiation Oncology Center, (5) ASLB orders pertaining to the Yankee Nuclear Power Station, and (6) Director`s decision pertaining to the Yankee Nuclear Power Station.

NONE

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

California Energy Commission's AB 118 Implementation Timeline  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

* Assumes that public comment/Commission review will not result in changes to regulatory language that would Investment Plan August 26, 2008 Post AB 118 Implementation Timeline for September 2, 2008, Staff Workshop with Advisory Committee Members September 9, 2008 Committee Workshop to Review Revised Draft Regulation Language

144

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Quality Assurance Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides an evaluation of the Software Quality Assurance Plan. The Software Quality Assurance Plan is intended to ensure all actions necessary for the software life cycle; verification and validation activities; documentation and deliverables; project management; configuration management, nonconformance reporting and corrective action; and quality assessment and improvement have been planned and a systematic pattern of all actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a software product conforms to established technical requirements; and to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kent Norris

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Quality Assurance Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides an evaluation of the Software Quality Assurance Plan. The Software Quality Assurance Plan is intended to ensure all actions necessary for the software life cycle; verification and validation activities; documentation and deliverables; project management; configuration management, nonconformance reporting and corrective action; and quality assessment and improvement have been planned and a systematic pattern of all actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a software product conforms to established technical requirements; and to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

EIA - Natural Gas Pipeline Network - Regulatory Authorities  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Regulatory Authorities Regulatory Authorities About U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines - Transporting Natural Gas based on data through 2007/2008 with selected updates U.S. Natural Gas Regulatory Authorities Beginning | Regulations Today | Coordinating Agencies | Regulation of Mergers and Acquisitions Beginning of Industry Restructuring In April 1992, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued its Order 636 and transformed the interstate natural gas transportation segment of the industry forever. Under it, interstate natural gas pipeline companies were required to restructure their operations by November 1993 and split-off any non-regulated merchant (sales) functions from their regulated transportation functions. This new requirement meant that interstate natural gas pipeline companies were allowed to only transport natural gas for their customers. The restructuring process and subsequent operations have been supervised closely by FERC and have led to extensive changes throughout the interstate natural gas transportation segment which have impacted other segments of the industry as well.

147

Emissions trading laws and regulations in China's pilot programs: an examination on the regulatory design and its implications for policy making .  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??This thesis examines the regulatory design of local pilot programs for emissions trading laws and regulations in China. The central investigation is to examine the (more)

ZHANG, HAO

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Uranium recovery research sponsored by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission at Pacific Northwest Laboratory. Quarterly progress report, June-September 1983  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents progress for the following major research projects: stabilization, engineering, and monitoring alternatives assessment for improving regulation of uranium recovery operations and waste management; attenuation of radon emission from uranium tailings; assessment of leachate movement from uranium mill tailings; and methods of minimizing ground-water contaminants from in-situ leach uranium mining.

Foley, M.G.; Deutsch, W.J.; Gee, G.W.; Hartley, J.N.; Kalkwarf, D.R.; Mayer, D.W.; Nelson, R.W.; Opitz, B.E.; Peterson, S.R.; Serne, R.J.

1983-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Study of the impacts of regulations affecting the acceptance of Integrated Community Energy Systems: public utility, energy facility siting and municipal franchising regulatory programs in Maine. Preliminary background report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Maine Supreme Court holds that the regulation of the operations of public utilities is an exercise of the police powers of the state. The legislature has delegated such regulatory authority to the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC). The statutes provide no role for local government in the regulation of public utilities. The PUC consists of three full time members, appointed by the Governor subject to review by the Joint Standing Committee on Public Utilities and to confirmation by the Legislature. They each serve seven year terms. One member is designated by the Governor as chairman. The Commission appoints a secretary, assistant secretary, director of transportation, and, with the approval of the Attorney General, a general counsel. A member of the PUC cannot have any official or professional connection or relation with or hold any stock or securities in any public utility. Public utility regulatory statutes, energy facility siting programs, and municipal franchising authority are examined to identify how they may impact on the ability of an organization, whether or not it be a regulated utility, to construct and operate an ICES.

Feurer, D.A.; Weaver, C.L.; Gallagher, K.C.; Hejna, D.; Rielley, K.J.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

GRR/Section 7-CA-a - State Plant Commissioning Process, Application for  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 7-CA-a - State Plant Commissioning Process, Application for GRR/Section 7-CA-a - State Plant Commissioning Process, Application for Certification < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-CA-a - State Plant Commissioning Process, Application for Certification 07CAAPlantCommissioningProcessApplicationForCertification.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies California Energy Commission Regulations & Policies Warren-Alquist Act California Code of Regulations, Title 20 - Public Utilities and Energy Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07CAAPlantCommissioningProcessApplicationForCertification.pdf 07CAAPlantCommissioningProcessApplicationForCertification.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

151

Utility Regulation (Indiana) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regulation (Indiana) Regulation (Indiana) Utility Regulation (Indiana) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial General Public/Consumer Industrial Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Indiana Program Type Generating Facility Rate-Making Provider Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission enforces regulations in this legislation that apply to all individuals, corporations, companies, and partnerships that may own, operate, manage, or control any equipment for the production, transmission, delivery, or furnishing of heat, light,

152

CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION'S  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION'S APPLIANCE REGULATIONS: A Summary Guide, Including Forms for Manufacturers, Trade Associations, and Other ...............................................................................................................1 III. Where to Find the Energy Commission Appliance Efficiency Regulations .....2 IV. Where to Get

153

Crystallization of the regulatory and effector domains of the key sporulation response regulator Spo0A  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Crystals of both the effector and regulatory domains of Spo0A from Bacillus stearothermophilus have been grown.

Muchov?, K.

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

154

GRR/Section 7-CA-b - State Plant Commissioning Process, Small Power Plant  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-CA-b - State Plant Commissioning Process, Small Power Plant 7-CA-b - State Plant Commissioning Process, Small Power Plant Exception < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-CA-b - State Plant Commissioning Process, Small Power Plant Exception 07CABPlantCommissioningProcessSmallPowerPlantExemption.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies California Energy Commission Regulations & Policies California Code of Regulations, Title 20 - Public Utilities and Energy Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07CABPlantCommissioningProcessSmallPowerPlantExemption.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

155

ENERGY COMMISSION PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Prosper, California Public Utilities Commission, 415.703.2160 GREENHOUSE GAS STRATEGIES OPINION RELEASED SACRAMENTO -- The California Energy Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission today released

156

Review of the International Atomic Energy Agency International database on reactor pressure vessel materials and US Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Oak Ridge National Laboratory embrittlement data base  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has supported neutron radiation effects information exchange through meetings and conferences since the mid-1960s. Through an International Working Group on Reliability of Reactor Pressure Components, information exchange and research activities were fostered through the Coordinated Research Program (CRP) sponsored by the IAEA. The final CRP meeting was held in November 1993, where it was recommended that the IAEA coordinate the development of an International Database on Reactor Pressure Vessel Material (IDRPVM) as the first step in generating an International Database on Aging Management. The purpose of this study was to provide special technical assistance to the NRC in monitoring and evaluating the IAEA activities in developing the IAEA IDRPVM, and to compare the IDRPVM with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) - Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Power Reactor Embrittlement Data Base (PR-EDB) and provide recommendations for improving the PR-EDB. A first test version of the IDRPVM was distributed at the First Meeting of Liaison Officers to the IAEA IDRPVM, in November 1996. No power reactor surveillance data were included in this version; the testing data were mainly from CRP Phase III data. Therefore, because of insufficient data and a lack of power reactor surveillance data received from the IAEA IDRPVM, the comparison is made based only on the structure of the IDRPVM. In general, the IDRPVM and the EDB have very similar data structure and data format. One anticipates that because the IDRPVM data will be collected from so many different sources, quality assurance of the data will be a difficult task. The consistency of experimental test results will be an important issue. A very wide spectrum of material characteristics of RPV steels and irradiation environments exists among the various countries. Hence the development of embrittlement prediction models will be a formidable task. 4 refs., 2 figs., 4 tabs.

Wang, J.A.; Kam, F.B.K.

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Intrastate Regulatory Act (Florida) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transmission Pipeline Intrastate Regulatory Act Transmission Pipeline Intrastate Regulatory Act (Florida) Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Intrastate Regulatory Act (Florida) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Developer Fuel Distributor Industrial Investor-Owned Utility Municipal/Public Utility Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Utility Program Info State Florida Program Type Safety and Operational Guidelines Provider Florida Public Service Commission The regulation of natural gas intrastate transportation and sale is deemed to be an exercise of the police power of the state for the protection of the public welfare. The Public Service Commission is empowered to fix and regulate rates and services of natural gas transmission companies, including, without limitation, rules and regulations for determining the

158

* Milepost Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy Savers [EERE]

using the eLibrary link. Click on the eLibrary link, click on "General Search," and enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e.,...

159

Notes On Nuclear Energy Regulation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Notes On Nuclear Energy Regulation ... Geology matters is a key lesson from the 2011 earthquake and tsunami that hit the coast of Japan, resulting in the meltdown of three nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant complex, said Allison M. Macfarlane, new head of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, at her first press briefing last week. ... In her address to energy reporters, she focused on her top priorities for the commission. ...

JEFF JOHNSON

2012-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

160

Regulatory Oversight of Foreign Clinical Trials: An Examination of the Industry's Influence on FDA Pharmaceutical Regulation and the Implications for Enforcement Activity Both Domestic and Abroad  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Regulatory Oversight of Foreign Clinical Trials: An Examination of the Industry's Influence on FDA Pharmaceutical Regulation and the Implications for Enforcement Activity Both Domestic and Abroad Beeta Kashani (FacultyAdvisor: Gary Reich... of the pharmaceutical industry on research regulation, and the factors that contribute to the FDA's regulatory and supervisory failures. The first part of this thesis will briefly outline the nature and ramifications of unethical clinical trials in the developing...

Kashani, Beeta

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Overview of Variable Renewable Energy Regulatory Issues: A Clean Energy Regulators Initiative Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This CERI report aims to provide an introductory overview of key regulatory issues associated with the deployment of renewable energy -- particularly variable renewable energy (VRE) sources such wind and solar power. The report draws upon the research and experiences from various international contexts, and identifies key ideas that have emerged from the growing body of VRE deployment experience and regulatory knowledge. The report assumes basic familiarity with regulatory concepts, and although it is not written for a technical audience, directs the reader to further reading when available. VRE deployment generates various regulatory issues: substantive, procedural, and public interest issues, and the report aims to provide an empirical and technical grounding for all three types of questions as appropriate.

Miller, M.; Cox, S.

2014-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

162

GRR/Section 7-OR-d - Expedited Plant Commissioning Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-OR-d - Expedited Plant Commissioning Process 7-OR-d - Expedited Plant Commissioning Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-OR-d - Expedited Plant Commissioning Process 07ORDExpeditedPlantCommissioningProcess.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Oregon Department of Energy Regulations & Policies Revised Statute 469 Oregon Administrative Rules 345-015 Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07ORDExpeditedPlantCommissioningProcess.pdf 07ORDExpeditedPlantCommissioningProcess.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative Power Plants with an average electric generating capacity of less than 100

163

GRR/Section 7-UT-c - Utah Public Service Commission | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-UT-c - Utah Public Service Commission 7-UT-c - Utah Public Service Commission < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-UT-c - Utah Public Service Commission 07UTCUtahPublicServiceCommissionProcess.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Utah Public Service Commission Regulations & Policies Utah Code Title 54 Public Utilities Utah Code 11-13-304 Certificate of public convenience and necessity required --Exceptions Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07UTCUtahPublicServiceCommissionProcess.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative

164

Rules and Regulations for Control of Ionizing Radiation (Arkansas) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rules and Regulations for Control of Ionizing Radiation (Arkansas) Rules and Regulations for Control of Ionizing Radiation (Arkansas) Rules and Regulations for Control of Ionizing Radiation (Arkansas) < Back Eligibility Utility Program Info State Arkansas Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Department of Health The Rules and Regulations for Control of Ionizing Radiation are the Arkansas state laws made in accordance the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rules. Any contractor with the US DOE or US Nuclear Regulatory Commission is exempt from the state laws. This set of rules and regulations basically restates the federal policy to ensure that Arkansas is in compliance with the federal standards governing nuclear energy. Specifically the State rules are equivalent to Nuclear Regulatory

165

USPS mailing and shipping prices increase effective January 26, 2014 The Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) approved the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Rate Case for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

USPS mailing and shipping prices increase effective January 26, 2014 The Postal Regulatory, the PRC approved the Exigency case by an additional 4.3% for a total increase of 5.9% and will take effect

Hemmers, Oliver

166

Modelling and analysis of a gene-regulatory feed-forward loop with basal expression of the second regulator  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Efficient adaptation strategies to changing environmental conditions are essential for bacteria to survive and grow. Fundamental restructuring of their metabolism is usually mediated by corresponding gene regulation. Here, often several different environmental stimuli have to be integrated into a reasonable, energy-efficient response. Fast fluctuations and overshooting have to be filtered out. The gene regulatory network for the anaerobic adaptation of the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is organized as a feed-forward loop (FFL), which is a three-gene network motif composed of two transcription factors (Anr for oxygen, NarxL for nitrate) and one target (Nar for nitrate reductase). The upstream transcription factor (Anr) induces the downstream transcription factor (NarXL). Both regulators act together positively by inducing the target (Nar) via a direct and indirect regulation path (coherent type-1 FFL). Since full promoter activity is only achieved when both transcription factors are present the target operon is expressed with a delay. Thus, in response to environmental stimuli (oxygen, nitrate), signals are mediated and processed in a way that short pulses are filtered out. In this study we analyze a special kind of FFL called \\{FFLk\\} by means of a family of ordinary differential equation models. The secondary FFL regulator (NarXL) is expressed constitutively but further induced in the presence of the upstream stimuli. This FFL modification has substantial influence on the response time and cost-benefit ratio mediated by environmental fluctuations. In order to find conditions where this regulatory network motif might be beneficial, we analyzed various models and environments. We describe the observed evolutional advantage of \\{FFLk\\} and its role in environmental adaptation and pathogenicity.

Louisa Roselius; Dirk Langemann; Johannes Mller; Burkhard A. Hense; Stefan Filges; Dieter Jahn; Richard Mnch

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

Regulation of Leaky Underground Fuel Tanks: An Anatomy of Regulatory Failure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

any leaks. (b) Most storage tank owners have only vagueaddition, regulations for tanks installed prior to Januarypertaining to existing tanks are more appropriately termed

White, Christen Carlson

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS for Modifying existing Chinook and chum salmon savings areas AMENDMENT 84 to the Fishery Management Plan by the current regulatory closure regulations, as much higher salmon bycatch rates are reportedly encountered

169

Regulatory treatment of allowances and compliance costs  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) established a national emission allowance trading system, a market-based form of environmental regulation designed to reduce and limit sulfur dioxide emissions. However, the allowance trading system is being applied primarily to an economically regulated electric utility industry. The combining of the new form of environmental regulation and economic regulation of electric utilities has raised a number of questions including what the role should be of the federal and state utility regulating commissions and how those actions will affect the decision making process of the utilities and the allowance market. There are several dimensions to the regulatory problems that commissions face. Allowances and utility compliance expenditures have implications for least-cost/IPR (integrated resource planning), prudence review procedures, holding company and multistate utility regulation and ratemaking treatment. The focus of this paper is on the ratemaking treatment. The following topics are covered: ratemaking treatment of allowances and compliance costs; Traditional cost-recovery mechanisms; limitations to the traditional approach; traditional approach and the allowance trading market; market-based cost recovery mechanisms; methods of determining the benchmark; determining the split between ratepayers and the utility; other regulatory approaches; limitations of incentive mechanisms.

Rose, K. [National Regulatory Research Institute, Columbus, OH (United States)

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Regulatory Tools  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regulatory Tools Regulatory Tools Home CRA - 2004 Final Recertification Decision CRA Comments & Responses CCA - 1996 CRA CARDs & TSDs CCA CARDs & TSDs Regulatory Tools Title 40 CFR Part 191 Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes. Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Re-Certification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the 40 CFR Part 191 Disposal Regulations. Part I Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the Disposal Regulations; Alternative Provisions; Proposed Rule. Friday August 9, 2002. Part II Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the Disposal Regulations: Certification Decision; Final Rule. May 18, 1998. Part III

171

Demand Response & Smart Grid - State Legislative and Regulatory Policy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Demand Response & Smart Grid - State Legislative and Regulatory Policy Demand Response & Smart Grid - State Legislative and Regulatory Policy Actions: October 2008 to May 2010 Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Demand Response & Smart Grid - State Legislative and Regulatory Policy Actions: October 2008 to May 2010 Focus Area: Energy Efficiency, - Utility Topics: Socio-Economic Website: www.demandresponsesmartgrid.org/Resources/Documents/State%20Policy%20S Equivalent URI: cleanenergysolutions.org/content/demand-response-smart-grid-state-legi Language: English Policies: Regulations Regulations: Enabling Legislation This report reviews the implementation of utility efficiency programs in the United States at both the state and federal levels. In addition, the updated report catalogues regulatory commission action, independent of

172

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program (SRP-UDP), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. The SRP-UDP has been completed and the SRP-Maintenance Program (SRP-MP) is now maintaining this listing. Besides updating previous information, Revision 3 adds approximately 80 citations. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Enforcement Manual, Generic Letters, Inspection Manual, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, Standard Technical Specifications and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Nickolaus, J.R.; Bohlander, K.L.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

GRR/Section 7-FD-b - Plant Commissioning Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-FD-b - Plant Commissioning Process 7-FD-b - Plant Commissioning Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-FD-b - Plant Commissioning Process 07FDBPlantCommissioning.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Bureau of Land Management United States Forest Service Regulations & Policies Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 43 CFR 3200.4 43 CFR 3261.20 43 CFR 3274.10 43 CFR 3274.11 43 CFR 3274.13 43 CFR 3275.11 43 CFR 3275.12 Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07FDBPlantCommissioning.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative Commercial operations from a Federal lease, a Federal unit, or a

174

GRR/Section 7-OR-b - State Plant Commissioning Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-OR-b - State Plant Commissioning Process 7-OR-b - State Plant Commissioning Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-OR-b - State Plant Commissioning Process 07ORBStatePlantCommissioningProcess (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Oregon Department of Energy Regulations & Policies OAR 345-20-0011 Contents of a Notice of Intent OAR 345-015-0001 et seq Proceedings, including site certificate hearings Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07ORBStatePlantCommissioningProcess (1).pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative

175

Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Regulatory Protein (CARP)-1 is Expressed inOsteoblasts and Regulated by PTH  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Highlights: CARP-1 is identified for the first time in bone cells. PTH downregulates CARP-1 expression in differentiated osteoblasts. PTH displaces CARP-1 from nucleus to the cytoplasm in differentiated osteoblasts. Downregulation of CARP-1 by PTH involves PKA, PKC and P-p38 MAPK pathways. -- Abstract: Bone mass is dependent on osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and life-span of osteoblasts. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) controls osteoblast cell cycle regulatory proteins and suppresses mature osteoblasts apoptosis. Intermittent administration of PTH increases bone mass but the mechanism of action are complex and incompletely understood. Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Regulatory Protein (CARP)-1 (aka CCAR1) is a novel transducer of signaling by diverse agents including cell growth and differentiation factors. To gain further insight into the molecular mechanism, we investigated involvement of CARP-1 in PTH signaling in osteoblasts. Immunostaining studies revealed presence of CARP-1 in osteoblasts and osteocytes, while a minimal to absent levels were noted in the chondrocytes of femora from 10 to 12-week old mice. Treatment of 7-day differentiated MC3T3-E1 clone-4 (MC-4) mouse osteoblastic cells and primary calvarial osteoblasts with PTH for 30 min to 5 h followed by Western blot analysis showed 2- to 3-fold down-regulation of CARP-1 protein expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner compared to the respective vehicle treated control cells. H-89, a Protein Kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, suppressed PTH action on CARP-1 protein expression indicating PKA-dependent mechanism. PMA, a Protein Kinase C (PKC) agonist, mimicked PTH action, and the PKC inhibitor, GF109203X, partially blocked PTH-dependent downregulation of CARP-1, implying involvement of PKC. U0126, a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Kinase (MEK) inhibitor, failed to interfere with CARP-1 suppression by PTH. In contrast, SB203580, p38 inhibitor, attenuated PTH down-regulation of CARP-1 suggesting that PTH utilized an Extracellular Signal Regulated Kinase (ERK)-independent but p38 dependent pathway to regulate CARP-1 protein expression in osteoblasts. Immunofluorescence staining of differentiated osteoblasts further revealed nuclear to cytoplasmic translocation of CARP-1 protein following PTH treatment. Collectively, our studies identified CARP-1 for the first time in osteoblasts and suggest its potential role in PTH signaling and bone anabolic action.

Sharma, Sonali; Mahalingam, Chandrika D.; Das, Varsha [Department of Internal Medicine/Endocrinology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States)] [Department of Internal Medicine/Endocrinology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States); Jamal, Shazia [Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States)] [Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States); Levi, Edi [Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States) [Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States); Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States); Rishi, Arun K. [Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States) [Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States); Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States); VA Medical Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States); Datta, Nabanita S., E-mail: ndatta@med.wayne.edu [Department of Internal Medicine/Endocrinology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States); Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States); Cardiovascular Research Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201 (United States)

2013-07-12T23:59:59.000Z

176

Continuous Commissioning  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Continuous Commissioning? for Existing Buildings D. E. Claridge, P.E., Ph.D., FASHRAE Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering Director, Energy Systems Laboratory Continuous Commissioning? and CC? are registered trademarks of the Texas... Commissioning Building Has ? Satisfied Occupants ? Comfortable Conditions ? Operational Issues Resolved ? Operating Staff Trained ? Reduced Operating Cost ? Saving from 10% to 20%+ over baseline total cost ? ROI of 40%+ ? Breakeven investment...

Culp, C.; Claridge, D. E.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

177

2 CCR State Lands Commission Article 1, General Provisions |...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: 2 CCR State Lands Commission Article 1, General ProvisionsLegal Abstract California regulations governing general...

178

Ikkepsilon regulates viral-induced interferon regulatory factor-3 activation via a redox-sensitive pathway  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-induced chemokine gene expression occurs through the activation of a subset of transcription factors, including Interferon Regulatory Factor (IRF)-3. In this study, we have investigated the signaling pathway leading to RSV-induced IRF-3 activation and whether it is mediated by intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Our results show that RSV infection induces expression and catalytic activity of IKK{epsilon}, a noncanonical IKK-like kinase. Expression of a kinase-inactive IKK{epsilon} blocks RSV-induced IRF-3 serine phosphorylation, nuclear translocation and DNA-binding, leading to inhibition of RANTES gene transcription, mRNA expression and protein synthesis. Treatment of alveolar epithelial cells with antioxidants or with NAD(P)H oxidase inhibitors abrogates RSV-induced chemokine secretion, IRF-3 phosphorylation and IKK{epsilon} induction, indicating that ROS generation plays a fundamental role in the signaling pathway leading to IRF-3 activation, therefore, identifying a novel molecular target for the development of strategies aimed to modify the inflammatory response associated with RSV infection of the lung.

Indukuri, Hemalatha [Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States); Castro, Shawn M. [Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States); Liao, S.-M. [Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA (United States); Feeney, Lee Ann [Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA (United States); Dorsch, Marion [Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA (United States); Coyle, Anthony J. [Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA (United States); Garofalo, Roberto P. [Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States); Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States); Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States); Brasier, Allan R. [Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States); Sealy Center for Molecular Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States); Casola, Antonella [Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States) and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States) and Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States)]. E-mail: ancasola@utmb.edu

2006-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

179

Public Service Commission and Natural Gas Safety Standards (Missouri)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This legislation establishes the state Public Service Commission, which has regulatory authority over the electric, gas, water, and telecommunications utilities. Section 386.572 of this legislation...

180

Regulation of steroid 5-{alpha} reductase type 2 (Srd5a2) by sterol regulatory element binding proteins and statin  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In this study, we show that sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs) regulate expression of Srd5a2, an enzyme that catalyzes the irreversible conversion of testosterone to dihydroxytestosterone in the male reproductive tract and is highly expressed in androgen-sensitive tissues such as the prostate and skin. We show that Srd5a2 is induced in livers and prostate from mice fed a chow diet supplemented with lovastatin plus ezitimibe (L/E), which increases the activity of nuclear SREBP-2. The three fold increase in Srd5a2 mRNA mediated by L/E treatment was accompanied by the induction of SREBP-2 binding to the Srd5a2 promoter detected by a ChIP-chip assay in liver. We identified a SREBP-2 responsive region within the first 300 upstream bases of the mouse Srd5a2 promoter by co-transfection assays which contain a site that bound SREBP-2 in vitro by an EMSA. Srd5a2 protein was also induced in cells over-expressing SREBP-2 in culture. The induction of Srd5a2 through SREBP-2 provides a mechanistic explanation for why even though statin therapy is effective in reducing cholesterol levels in treating hypercholesterolemia it does not compromise androgen production in clinical studies.

Seo, Young-Kyo [Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, 3244 McGaugh Hall, University of California, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3900 (United States)] [Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, 3244 McGaugh Hall, University of California, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3900 (United States); Zhu, Bing [Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0144 (United States)] [Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0144 (United States); Jeon, Tae-Il [Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, 3244 McGaugh Hall, University of California, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3900 (United States)] [Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, 3244 McGaugh Hall, University of California, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3900 (United States); Osborne, Timothy F., E-mail: tfosborn@uci.edu [Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, 3244 McGaugh Hall, University of California, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3900 (United States)

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework DOE's Nuclear Safety Enabling Legislation Regulatory Enforcement & Oversight Regulatory Governance Atomic Energy Act 1946 Atomic Energy Act 1954 Energy Reorganization Act 1974 DOE Act 1977 Authority and responsibility to regulate nuclear safety at DOE facilities 10 CFR 830 10 CFR 835 10 CFR 820 Regulatory Implementation Nuclear Safety Radiological Safety Procedural Rules ISMS-QA; Operating Experience; Metrics and Analysis Cross Cutting DOE Directives & Manuals DOE Standards Central Technical Authorities (CTA) Office of Health, Safety, and Security (HSS) Line Management SSO/ FAC Reps 48 CFR 970 48 CFR 952 Federal Acquisition Regulations External Oversight *Defense Nuclear Facility

182

North Dakota State Regulations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

North Dakota North Dakota State Regulations: North Dakota State of North Dakota The North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC), through its Oil and Gas Division (OGD), is the regulatory agency for oil and gas exploration and production activities in North Dakota. The North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) Environmental Health Section (EHS) has the responsibility to safeguard the quality of North Dakota's air, land, and water resources. Contact North Dakota Industrial Commission Oil and Gas Division 600 East Boulevard Avenue, Dept. 405 Bismarck, ND 58505-0840 (701) 328-8020 (phone) (701) 328-8022 (fax) North Dakota Department of Health Environmental Health Section 1200 Missouri Avenue P.O. Box 5520 Bismarck, ND 58506-5520 (701) 328-5150 (phone) (701) 328-5200 (fax) Disposal Practices and Applicable Regulations

183

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. In addition to updating previous information, Revision 1 adds citations from the NRC Inspection Manual and the Improved Standard Technical Specifications. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Ankrum, A.; Nickolaus, J.; Vinther, R.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.; Hammer, J.; Sherfey, L.; Warner, R. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide describes building commissioning, recommissioning, retrocommissioning, and continuous commissioning for federal facilities.

185

REGULATORY STRATEGIES TO MINIMIZE GENERATION OF REGULATED WASTES FROM CLEANUP, CONTINUED USE OR DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES CONTAMINATED WITH POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) - 11198  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Disposal costs for liquid PCB radioactive waste are among the highest of any category of regulated waste. The high cost is driven by the fact that disposal options are extremely limited. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) regulations require most liquids with PCBs at concentration of {ge} 50 parts-per-million to be disposed by incineration or equivalent destructive treatment. Disposal fees can be as high as $200 per gallon. This figure does not include packaging and the cost to transport the waste to the disposal facility, or the waste generator's labor costs for managing the waste prior to shipment. Minimizing the generation of liquid radioactive PCB waste is therefore a significant waste management challenge. PCB spill cleanups often generate large volumes of waste. That is because the removal of PCBs typically requires the liberal use of industrial solvents followed by a thorough rinsing process. In a nuclear facility, the cleanup process may be complicated by the presence of radiation and other occupational hazards. Building design and construction features, e.g., the presence of open grating or trenches, may also complicate cleanup. In addition to the technical challenges associated with spill cleanup, selection of the appropriate regulatory requirements and approach may be challenging. The TSCA regulations include three different sections relating to the cleanup of PCB contamination or spills. EPA has also promulgated a separate guidance policy for fresh PCB spills that is published as Subpart G of 40 CFR 761 although it is not an actual regulation. Applicability is based on the circumstances of each contamination event or situation. Other laws or regulations may also apply. Identification of the allowable regulatory options is important. Effective communication with stakeholders, particularly regulators, is just as important. Depending on the regulatory path that is taken, cleanup may necessitate the generation of large quantities of regulated waste. Allowable options must be evaluated carefully in order to reduce compliance risks, protect personnel, limit potential negative impacts on facility operations, and minimize the generation of wastes subject to TSCA. This paper will identify critical factors in selecting the appropriate TSCA regulatory path in order to minimize the generation of radioactive PCB waste and reduce negative impacts to facilities. The importance of communicating pertinent technical issues with facility staff, regulatory personnel, and subsequently, the public, will be discussed. Key points will be illustrated by examples from five former production reactors at the DOE Savannah River Site. In these reactors a polyurethane sealant was used to seal piping penetrations in the biological shield walls. During the intense neutron bombardment that occurred during reactor operation, the sealant broke down into a thick, viscous material that seeped out of the piping penetrations over adjacent equipment and walls. Some of the walls were painted with a PCB product. PCBs from the paint migrated into the degraded sealant, creating PCB 'spill areas' in some of these facilities. The regulatory cleanup approach selected for each facility was based on its operational status, e.g., active, inactive or undergoing decommissioning. The selected strategies served to greatly minimize the generation of radioactive liquid PCB waste. It is expected that this information would be useful to other DOE sites, DOD facilities, and commercial nuclear facilities constructed prior to the 1979 TSCA ban on most manufacturing and uses of PCBs.

Lowry, N.

2010-11-05T23:59:59.000Z

186

Moving from self-regulation to external regulation of Department of Energy facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper discusses the initiative to transfer the regulation of Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The paper gives an overview of some of the major technical, policy and legal issues that accompany this initiative. The paper focuses on specific issues and how they may be affected by external regulation of occupational radiation protection at DOE facilities. Differences between the NRC and the DOE approach to regulating nuclear safety are compared and contrasted. Some projected impacts from this transition are examined. Finally, recommendations are provided that may enhance the transition, increasing the likelihood of successful external NRC regulation.

Wishau, R.J.; Dawson, J.; Lee, D.W.

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

187

Incentive regulation of investor-owned nuclear power plants by public utility regulators. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) periodically surveys the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and state regulatory commissions that regulate utility owners of nuclear power plants. The NRC is interested in identifying states that have established economic or performance incentive programs applicable to nuclear power plants, how the programs are being implemented, and in determining the financial impact of the programs on the utilities. The NRC interest stems from the fact that such programs have the potential to adversely affect the safety of nuclear power plants. The current report is an update of NUREG/CR-5975, Incentive Regulation of Investor-Owned Nuclear Power Plants by Public Utility Regulators, published in January 1993. The information in this report was obtained from interviews conducted with each state regulatory agency that administers an incentive program and each utility that owns at least 10% of an affected nuclear power plant. The agreements, orders, and settlements that form the basis for each incentive program were reviewed as required. The interviews and supporting documentation form the basis for the individual state reports describing the structure and financial impact of each incentive program.

McKinney, M.D.; Seely, H.E.; Merritt, C.R.; Baker, D.C. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

The Feasibility of Establishing a De Minimis Level of Radiation Dose and a Regulatory Cutoff Policy for Nuclear Regulation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This report discusses the feasibility of a de minimis policy for radiation exposure guidance and regulation. This policy would establish a threshold below which regulation of radiation sources, practices, or e...

Joyce P. Davis

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGION I REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 194061415 Docket No. 040-07123 JUL. 19 '996 License No. SUB-748 (Retired) United States -Department of Energy O ffice of EnvironmentalRestoration ATTN: W. Alexander Williams, Ph.D. EM-241 Cloverleaf Building 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, Maryland 20874-1290 SUBJECT: NL INDUSTRIES, ALBANY, NEW YORK Dear Dr. Williams: We are aware that DOE is responsible for the former National Lead Company (NL Industries) facility near Albany, New York. During a recent review of retired AEC License No. SUB-748, we found records which provide additional information concerning the use of source material at the facility. Copies of AEC documents which describe activities at that facility are enclosed. License No. SUB-00748 authorized possession of 38,000 pounds of uranium during

190

Sandia National Laboratories: Federal Electric Regulatory Commission  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

News, News & Events, Partnership, Photovoltaic, Renewable Energy, SMART Grid, Solar, SunShot, Systems Analysis After two years of industry consultation, the Federal Electric...

191

Sandia National Laboratories: Federal Electric Regulatory Commission...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

News, News & Events, Partnership, Photovoltaic, Renewable Energy, SMART Grid, Solar, SunShot, Systems Analysis After two years of industry consultation, the Federal Electric...

192

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Safeguards Information for Contention Preparation on a Combined

Laughlin, Robert B.

193

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area October 2007 Prepared that bycatch may be exacerbated by the current regulatory closure regulations, as much higher salmon bycatch

194

Audit Evaluation Report: IG-0830 | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2009 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is tasked with regulating and overseeing...

195

California Energy Commission COMMISSION REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

emissions, reduce petroleum use, improve air quality, and stimulate the sustainable production and use measurable transition from the nearly exclusive use of petroleum fuels to a diverse portfolio of alternative fuels that meet petroleum reduction goals and alternative fuel use goals." The Energy Commission has

196

California Energy Commission COMMISSION REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

petroleum use, improve air quality, and stimulate the sustainable production and use of biofuels within measurable transition from the nearly exclusive use of petroleum fuels to a diverse portfolio of alternative fuels that meet petroleum reduction goals and alternative fuel use goals." The Energy Commission has

197

E-Print Network 3.0 - abrogates regulatory function Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

actions that are functionally equivalent... : Regulatory Taking Challenges to Local Environmental Regulation Environmental Practicum Memo: Regulatory... , how should a...

198

European Commission  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

European Commission European Commission Directorate-General for Energy & Transport Ministry of Industry an Energy of the State of Qatar Gulf Co-operation Council Secretariat General EU-GCC Seminar: "Natural Gas Technologies - Realities & Prospects" Doha, Qatar, 7-8 February 2005 STREAM B: "Advanced Technologies for Power Generation through Natural Gas & Desalination" SESSION B.3: STATE OF THE ART OF COMBINED CYCLE PLANT Michael VOLLMER, Head of Combined Cycle Power Plant Development, ALSTOM Power Turbo-Systems February 2005 February 2005 Power Turbo-Systems State Of The Art Combined Cycle Power Plants Michael Vollmer 2 ALSTOM (Switzerland)Ltd© 2005. Preliminary/for discussion purposes only. We reserve all rights in this document and in the information

199

NRC - regulator of nuclear safety  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was formed in 1975 to regulate the various commercial and institutional uses of nuclear energy, including nuclear power plants. The agency succeeded the Atomic Energy Commission, which previously had responsibility for both developing and regulating nuclear activities. Federal research and development work for all energy sources, as well as nuclear weapons production, is now conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy. Under its responsibility to protect public health and safety, the NRC has three principal regulatory functions: (1) establish standards and regulations, (2) issue licenses for nuclear facilities and users of nuclear materials, and (3) inspect facilities and users of nuclear materials to ensure compliance with the requirements. These regulatory functions relate to both nuclear power plants and to other uses of nuclear materials - like nuclear medicine programs at hospitals, academic activities at educational institutions, research work, and such industrial applications as gauges and testing equipment. The NRC places a high priority on keeping the public informed of its work. The agency recognizes the interest of citizens in what it does through such activities as maintaining public document rooms across the country and holding public hearings, public meetings in local areas, and discussions with individuals and organizations.

NONE

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Utah Labor Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Labor Commission Labor Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name Utah Labor Commission Address 160 East 300 South, 3rd Floor Place Salt Lake City, Utah Zip 84114-6600 Phone number (801) 530-6800 Website http://laborcommission.utah.go References Website[1] This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utah Labor Commission is an organization based in Salt Lake City, Utah. The Utah Labor Commission is the regulatory agency responsible for preserving the balance established by the legislature for protecting the health, safety, and economic well-being of employees and employers. It is a multi-division state agency directed by a Commissioner who is appointed by the Governor. The Commissioner oversees the various functions of the divisions within the Commission.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Regulatory guidance document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Program Management System Manual requires preparation of the OCRWM Regulatory Guidance Document (RGD) that addresses licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance. The document provides: regulatory compliance policy; guidance to OCRWM organizational elements to ensure a consistent approach when complying with regulatory requirements; strategies to achieve policy objectives; organizational responsibilities for regulatory compliance; guidance with regard to Program compliance oversight; and guidance on the contents of a project-level Regulatory Compliance Plan. The scope of the RGD includes site suitability evaluation, licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance, in accordance with the direction provided by Section 4.6.3 of the PMS Manual. Site suitability evaluation and regulatory compliance during site characterization are significant activities, particularly with regard to the YW MSA. OCRWM`s evaluation of whether the Yucca Mountain site is suitable for repository development must precede its submittal of a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Accordingly, site suitability evaluation is discussed in Chapter 4, and the general statements of policy regarding site suitability evaluation are discussed in Section 2.1. Although much of the data and analyses may initially be similar, the licensing process is discussed separately in Chapter 5. Environmental compliance is discussed in Chapter 6. Safety and Health compliance is discussed in Chapter 7.

NONE

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

Poster Thur Eve 02: Regulatory oversight of the robotic radiosurgery facilities  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Following a recent review of the Class II Nuclear Facilities and Prescribed Equipment Regulations and regulatory oversight of particle accelerators the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) has changed its policy concerning the regulation of particle accelerators. In November 2011 the CNSC began to exercise its regulatory authority with respect to all particle accelerators operating at a beam energy of 1 (one) MeV or greater. The CNSC already licences and inspects particle accelerators capable of operating at or above 10 MeV. The decision to now include low energy particle accelerators (i.e. those operating at or above 1 MeV) ensures adequate uniform and consistent regulatory oversight for all Class II accelerators. The CNSC expects these facilities to comply with CNSC requirements by December 2013. Besides conventional linear accelerators of lower energy (6 MeV or below) typically found in cancer clinics two types of equipment now fall under the CNSC's regulatory oversight as a result of the above change: roboticradiosurgery and tomotherapy equipment and facilities. A number of clinics in Canada already operates these types of equipment and facilities. The safety aspects of radiosurgery equipment differ slightly from those for conventional linear accelerators. This poster aims to present an approach taken by the CNSC to regulate roboticradiosurgery equipment and facilities. The presentation will explain how to meet regulatory requirements of the Class II Nuclear Facilities and Prescribed Equipment Regulations by licensees operating or planning to acquire these types of equipment and facilities.

K Broda

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

E-Print Network 3.0 - armed forces commission Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

is not just about power plants. Nuclear engineers design, build and Summary: of Energy, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, etc.); nuclear utilities; reactor and nuclear fuel...

204

Natural Gas Regulation - Other Gas-Related Information Sources | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Natural Gas Regulation - Other Gas-Related Information Sources Natural Gas Regulation - Other Gas-Related Information Sources Natural Gas Regulation - Other Gas-Related Information Sources The single largest source of energy information available is the Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration (EIA). The EIA publishes extensive reports on natural gas and other energy sources. Domestic natural gas markets are regulated in part by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The commission's chief area of concern is the interstate natural gas market. Natural gas moves for the most part by pipeline in the United States. The safety of those pipelines is the concern of the Department of Transportation's Office of Pipeline Safety. In Canada the regulation of interprovincial and international natural gas is the responsibility of the National Energy Board. Their areas of

205

Public Utilities Commission Consumer Programs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Public Utilities Commission Consumer Programs Water Programs The CPUC regulates company's service territory and have varying income limits. Check with your water utility to find out plans that can help you man- age your bills. Contact the utility directly, using the customer service

206

Commissioning | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commissioning Commissioning Commissioning October 16, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis Project Construction Commissioning Operations & Maintenance Commissioning renewable energy for new construction projects and major renovations requires special consideration in selecting the commissioning agent and team, developing the specifications, conducting the full commissioning process, and integrating measurement and verification (M&V) systems. Commissioning can reduce overall costs related to construction deficiencies and ensure more efficient building and systems operation. For new construction projects or major renovations with renewable energy systems, commissioning is critical to the ultimate goal of operating all building systems as safely, optimally, and efficiently as their designers intended.

207

Light-Regulated Hypocotyl Elongation Involves Proteasome-Dependent Degradation of the Microtubule Regulatory Protein WDL3 in Arabidopsis  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...unknown. It is well known that many fundamental cellular processes are regulated by...significant (Figure 1C). Scanning electronic microscopy revealed no major differences...rpn1a-4 mutant (Figure 6E). Scanning electronic microscopy revealed no major differences...

Xiaomin Liu; Tao Qin; Qianqian Ma; Jingbo Sun; Ziqiang Liu; Ming Yuan; Tonglin Mao

2013-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

208

Regulatory Drivers | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers Statutes and Regulations Relating to Legacy Management Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 10: Energy "Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste," 10 CFR 61 "Occupational Radiation Protection," 10 CFR 835 Title 40: Protection of Environment "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations," 40 CFR 141 "Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities," 40 CFR 264 "National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan," 40 CFR 300 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) "Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability

209

River Basin Commissions (Indiana)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This legislation establishes river basin commissions, for the Kankakee, Maumee, St. Joseph, and Upper Wabash Rivers. The commissions facilitate and foster cooperative planning and coordinated...

210

Types of Commissioning  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Several commissioning types exist to address the specific needs of equipment and systems across both new and existing buildings. The following commissioning types provide a good overview.

211

Other Regulatory Efforts | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Efforts Other Regulatory Efforts In addition to regulating international electricity trade, the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability participates in other...

212

Energy/Environment/Commissioning  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

//NESTECNESTEC Nobuo NakaharaNobuo Nakahara ICEBO/APCBCAsia Pacific Conference on Building Commissioning 2006.11.7 Opening AddressOpening AddressEnergy/Environment/CommissioningEnergy/Environment/Commissioning Call for Call... Commissioning PrincipleCommissioning Principle Evaluation PrincipleEvaluation Principle How Building & Urban Energy System How Building & Urban Energy System shall be completed and maintained?shall be completed and maintained? Mechanism of Urban Environment...

Nakahara, N.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

214

Commissioning and Retro-Commissioning Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

To ensure a new building's systems are correctly installed and are operating properly, a commissioning program may be incorporated into all building phases, including design, construction, and operations.

215

The development of regulatory expectations for computer-based safety systems for the UK nuclear programme  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) of the UK's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has completed a review of their Safety Assessment Principles (SAPs) for Nuclear Installations recently. During the period of the SAPs review in 2004-2005 the designers of future UK naval reactor plant were optioneering the control and protection systems that might be implemented. Because there was insufficient regulatory guidance available in the naval sector to support this activity the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator (DNSR) invited the NII to collaborate with the production of a guidance document that provides clarity of regulatory expectations for the production of safety cases for computer based safety systems. A key part of producing regulatory expectations was identifying the relevant extant standards and sector guidance that reflect good practice. The three principal sources of such good practice were: IAEA Safety Guide NS-G-1.1 (Software for Computer Based Systems Important to Safety in Nuclear Power Plants), European Commission consensus document (Common Position of European Nuclear Regulators for the Licensing of Safety Critical Software for Nuclear Reactors) and IEC nuclear sector standards such as IEC60880. A common understanding has been achieved between the NII and DNSR and regulatory guidance developed which will be used by both NII and DNSR in the assessment of computer-based safety systems and in the further development of more detailed joint technical assessment guidance for both regulatory organisations. (authors)

Hughes, P. J. [HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorate Marine Engineering Submarines Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator Serco Assurance Redgrave Court, Merton Road, Bootle L20 7HS (United Kingdom); Westwood, R.N; Mark, R. T. [FLEET HQ, Leach Building, Whale Island, Portsmouth, PO2 8BY (United Kingdom); Tapping, K. [Serco Assurance,Thomson House, Risley, Warrington, WA3 6GA (United Kingdom)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

Regulatory and technical reports (abstract index journal): Annual compilation for 1996, Volume 21, No. 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This compilation is the annual cumulation of bibliographic data and abstracts for the formal regulatory and technical reports issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff and its contractors.

Sheehan, M.A.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

Regulatory Highlights  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

It also described plans relating to the need to remove reference to wet chemical tests for heavy metals from all individual monographs. ... This was reviewed in detail in the previous regulatory review. ... A concept paper and business plan have been developed for an ICH guideline focused on technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle management. ...

Andrew Teasdale

2014-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

218

UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

I(S.0 -01: I(S.0 -01: SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL LlCEWSE Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Part 70, "Special Nuclear Material Regulations," o. license is hereby issued authorizing the licensee to receive and possess the special nuclear material designated below; to use such special nuclear material for the purpose(s) and at the place(s) designated below; and to transfer such material to persons' authorized to receive it in accordance with the regulations in said Port. This license shall be deemed to contain the conditions specified in Section 70.32(a) of said regulations, and is subject to all applicable rules, regtdations, and orders of the Atomic Energy Commission now or hereafter in

219

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW Regulatory Amendment for a Catch Sharing Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW Regulatory Amendment for a Catch Sharing Plan For the Pacific Halibut and 3A Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Date Charter and Commercial Longline Sectors in International Pacific Halibut Commission Regulatory Areas 2C

220

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Key Terms Key Terms to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on AddThis.com... Home About Covered Fleets Compliance Methods Alternative Fuel Petitions Resources Guidance Documents Statutes & Regulations Program Annual Reports Fact Sheets Newsletter Case Studies Workshops Tools Key Terms FAQs Key Terms The Energy Policy Act (EPAct) includes specific terminology related to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

California Energy Commission GUIDELINES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Utilities Commission, CPUC, solar, solar energy systems, solar energy system incentive programsCalifornia Energy Commission GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR CALIFORNIA'S SOLAR guidelines for solar energy system incentive programs in California. The Senate Bill 1

222

Regulation of geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been actively developing needed regulations over the last two years for the geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste. Technical criteria are about to be published in the form of a proposed regulation. The waste packages, underground facility, and geologic setting form the major elements of any geologic repository and the basis of a multibarrier system. Performance objectives and supporting technical criteria have been developed for each of these repository elements to provide benchmarks for scientists and engineers working in each of these major areas. 9 refs.

White, L.A.

1981-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

223

6 - Nuclear Waste Regulations  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The most influential national and international bodies providing recommendations on radiation protection are described, including the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Protection philosophies and the ICRP general principles of radiation protection are discussed. Radioactive material regulations and sources of radiation are explained. Criteria of exemption from regulatory control are discussed with examples of exemption levels for naturally occurring and radioactive waste radionuclides. Clearance of both moderate and bulk amounts of materials from regulatory control is also explained, including examples of EU and the UK regulations. Dose limits recommended by the ICRP are given, as well as the main principles of control of radiation hazards. Nuclear waste classification schemes are outlined, including the IAEA classification scheme. A brief explanation of nuclear waste classes including exempt waste, very short-lived waste, very low-level waste, low-level waste, intermediate-level waste and high-level waste is given. Examples of waste classification schemes are given, including that of the UK.

M.I. Ojovan; W.E. Lee

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

224

E-Print Network 3.0 - active regulatory processes Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Shafter, Hawaii... under Executive Order 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review," issued on January 18, 2011... . The Regulatory Program of the U.S. Army Corps of...

225

Microsoft Word - Regulating Change.docx  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Award No.: DE-FC26-06NT15567 Final Report Technology's Impact on Production Submitted by: Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission PO Box 53127 Oklahoma City, OK 73152 Prepared for: United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory March 17, 2010 Office of Fossil Energy New Energy Technologies Regulating Change Final Scientific/Technical Report Reporting Period Start Date: July 1, 2006 Reporting Period End Date: June 30, 2009 DE-FC26-06NT15567 Tasks 2 & 3 Principal Authors: Rachel Amann, Federal Projects Director Ellis Deweese, Legal and Regulatory Research Specialist Deborah Shipman, Technical Writing Specialist Submitted to:

226

Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Multiple States) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Industrial Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Municipal/Public Utility Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Program Info State District of Columbia Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin's (ICPRB) mission is to enhance, protect, and conserve the water and associated land resources of the Potomac River and its tributaries through regional and interstate

227

Natural gas cavern storage regulation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Investigation of an incident at an LPG storage facility in Texas by U.S. Department of Transportation resulted in recommendation that state regulation of natural gas cavern storage might be improved. Interstate Oil & Gas Compact Commission has established a subcommittee to analyze the benefits and risks associated with natural gas cavern storage, and to draft a regulation model which will suggest engineering and performance specifications. The resulting analysis and regulatory language will be reviewed by I.O.G.C.C., and if approved, distributed to member states (including New York) for consideration. Should the states desire assistance in modifying the language to reflect local variables, such as policy and geology, I.O.G.C.C. may offer assistance. The proposed presentation will review the I.O.G.C.C. product (if published at that date), and discuss implications of its application in New York.

Heneman, H.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor MARCH 2013 CEC5002013014 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily

229

U. S. Atomic Energy Commission  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Commission Commission Division of Licensing and Regulation Washington 25, D. C. .I,.----- Attention: Mr. Eber R. Price Gentlemen: ' B?&-# This is in response to your letter of 17 April 1962 regarding the inspection conducted at our Jayhawk Works at Pittsburg, Kansas on May 2-5, 1961 under Source Material License C-4352 and Special Nuclear Material Licenses No. S&l-154 and SNM-329. Replying to your items as listed in your letter, we submit the following in- formation'for your consideration: I. Time-occupancy studies have been made in the area where high air-borne dust samples were observed. A. I&dents Involving Thorium Six incidents have been noted involving thorium, natural isotopic CLSS5.Y. follows: The counts of the air samples in these six samples are as

230

U. S. Atomic Energy Commission  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Commission Commission Division of Licensing and Regulation Washington 25, D. C. Attention: Mr. Eber R. Price Gentlemen: This is in response to your letter of 17 April 1962 regarding the inspection conducted at our Jayhawk Works at Pittsburg, Kansas on May Z-5, 1961 under Source Material License C-4352 and Special Nuclear Material Licenses No. SW-154 and S.Iw-329. Reblying to your items as listed in your letter, we submit the following in- formation'for your consideration: I. Time-occupancy studies have been made in the area where high air-borne dust samples "ere observed. A. Incidents Involving Thorium Six incidents have bee" noted involving thorium, natural isotopic ClSS=y. The counts of the air samples in these six samples are as follows: Microcuries per ml of Air

231

Regulatory Compliance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. The Department of Energy is not a regulatory agency; however it does self-regulate its own radioactive waste. DOE is also affected by a variety of statutes, legislation, regulations, directives and guidance. Many of the current compliance-related actions revolve around waste and material disposition. These include National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Impact Statements and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Records of Decision. Links, below,

232

Regulatory facility guide for Ohio  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Regulatory Facility Guide (RFG) has been developed for the DOE and contractor facilities located in the state of Ohio. It provides detailed compilations of international, federal, and state transportation-related regulations applicable to shipments originating at destined to Ohio facilities. This RFG was developed as an additional resource tool for use both by traffic managers who must ensure that transportation operations are in full compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements and by oversight personnel who must verify compliance activities.

Anderson, S.S.; Bock, R.E.; Francis, M.W.; Gove, R.M.; Johnson, P.E.; Kovac, F.M.; Mynatt, J.O. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Rymer, A.C. [Transportation Consulting Services, Knoxville, TN (United States)

1994-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

233

Commissioning Process | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Process Process Commissioning Process October 16, 2013 - 4:44pm Addthis The commissioning process is designed to verify that a renewable energy project meets specified agency design, performance, and operational requirements. To ensure that the level and focus of commissioning efforts are appropriate to the scope and complexity of the project, the commissioning planning process should begin at the same time as the design phase of the project. Integrating Commissioning Into the Design Process Developing a Detailed Commissioning Plan Testing Systems and Providing Commissioning Reports Performing Enhanced Commissioning Delivering Final Documentation Integrating Commissioning Into the Design Process The commissioning agent should attend design team meetings, review the

234

Retro-Commissioning (RCx)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Retro-Commissioning Retro-Commissioning (RCx) FUPWG Meeting 20 October, 2010 RCx In UESC Contracts  Put RCx in Delivery Orders  Clear Scope of Work  Specify kW per Ton on Completion  State the Current Condition of the Equipment  State the Expected Performance in the Delivery Orders and Get the Contractor to Agree Up-Front  Don't Hire a Contractor that has Never Done Commissioning  Hire a Commissioning Agent  This Can Be Expensive What We Do at SCE  We Commission Everything  We ReCommission Everything to Some Degree  San Bernardino Story Up Front  You must review and approve the construction scope, budget, and schedule including all RCx activities BEFORE work begins at site  Use Pre-Established Guidelines (FEMP

235

Regulatory Policy and Markets for Energy Storage in North America  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The last 5 years have been one of the most exciting times for the energy storage industry. We have seen significant advancements in the regulatory process to make accommodations for valuing and monetizing energy storage for what it provides to the grid. The most impactful regulatory decision for the energy storage industry has come from California, where the California Public Utilities Commission issued a decision that mandates procurement requirements of 1.325 GW for energy storage to 3 investor-own utilities in 4 stages: in 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020. Furthermore, at the Federal level, FERCs Order 755, requires the transmission operators to develop pay for performance tariffs for ancillary services. This has had direct impact on the market design of US competitive wholesale markets and the monetization of fast responding grid assets. While this order is technology neutral, it clearly plays into the fast-responding capability of energy storage technologies. Today PJM, CAISO, MISO, NYISO, and NE-ISO have implemented Order 755 and offer new tariff for regulation services based on pay-for-performance principles. Furthermore, FERC Order 784, issued in July 2013 requires transmission providers to consider speed and accuracy in determining the requirements for ancillary services. In November 2013, FERC issued Order 972, which revises the small generator interconnection agreement which declares energy storage as a power source. This order puts energy storage on par with existing generators. This paper will discuss the implementation of FERCs Pay for Performance Regulation order at all ISOs in the U.S. under FERC regulatory authority (this excludes ERCOT). Also discussed will be the market impacts and overall impacts on the NERC regulation performance indexes. The paper will end with a discussion on the California and Ontario, Canada procurement mandates and the opportunity that it may present to the energy storage industry.

Kintner-Meyer, Michael CW

2014-05-14T23:59:59.000Z

236

Retro-Commissioning (RCx)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers retro-commissioning (RCx) and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Rapid City, South Dakota.

237

California Energy Commission  

Energy Savers [EERE]

California Energy Commission Quadrennial Water Review Comments - June 19, 2014 Water-Energy Nexus Water and energy systems are inextricably linked -- producing energy uses large...

238

Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework DOE's Nuclear Safety Enabling Legislation Regulatory Enforcement & Oversight Regulatory Governance Atomic Energy Act 1946...

239

Low Dose Radiation Program: Links - Agencies with Radiation Regulatory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Agencies with Radiation Regulatory Concerns and Involvement Agencies with Radiation Regulatory Concerns and Involvement Biological Effects of Low Level Exposures (BELLE) Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Center for Risk Excellence Health Protection Agency The Health Risks of Extraterrestrial Environments International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Inc. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA) NASA Space Radiation Program National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA OBRR Task Book Publication National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) National Toxicology Program (NTP) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

240

European Commission Agriculture and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development Good practice guidance on the sustainable Commission (EC) DG Agriculture and Rural Development 130, Rue de la Loi B ­ 1049 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 (0) 2-2969909 Fax: +32 (0) 2-29211 33 E-mail: info@ec.europa.eu Web: https://www.ec.europa.eu/agriculture

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Introduction Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Introduction B uilding commissioning has often been likened to commissioning of a ship, where the Owners thor- oughly verify and prove the func- tional performance of all parts - engines, compasses, sonar, radar, radio, generators, potable water systems, and so on - under all pos- sible conditions and as a condition of acceptance before placing the ship in service. And where the Owner checks the presence of sys- tem operating and procedures manuals and the availability of up- to-date navigation charts. And where the crew has been properly and thoroughly trained on the ship's systems' operations and emergency procedures. Commissioning is not new - ships and aircraft have been commissioned for years. Building commissioning has

242

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Introduction Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Introduction B uilding commissioning has often been likened to commissioning of a ship, where the Owners thor- oughly verify and prove the func- tional performance of all parts - engines, compasses, sonar, radar, radio, generators, potable water systems, and so on - under all pos- sible conditions and as a condition of acceptance before placing the ship in service. And where the Owner checks the presence of sys- tem operating and procedures manuals and the availability of up- to-date navigation charts. And where the crew has been properly and thoroughly trained on the ship's systems' operations and emergency procedures. Commissioning is not new - ships and aircraft have been commissioned for years. Building commissioning has

243

Commission | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

57 57 Varnish cache server Commission Dataset Summary Description This dataset contains oil and gas drilling and permit records for February 2011. State oil and gas boards and commissions make oil and gas data and information open to the public. To view the full range of data contained at the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, visit http://doa.alaska.gov/ogc/ Source Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Date Released February 28th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords Alaska Commission gas oil Well record Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon http://doa.alaska.gov/ogc/drilling/dindex.html (xls, 34.3 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Monthly Time Period License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL)

244

TATE OF CALIFORNI NERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

S TATE OF CALIFORNI A E NERGY COMMISSION 20001975 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Gray Davis, Governor OCTOBER 2000 P500-00-018 Reconciliation of Retailer Claims, 1999 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION William, Secretary for Resources S TATE OF CALIFORNI A E NERGY COMMISSION 20001975 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Gray

245

Over-expression of Stat5b confers protection against diabetes in the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice via up-regulation of CD4{sup +}CD25{sup +} regulatory T cells  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer This is the first study to provide direct evidence of the role of Stat5b in NOD mice. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Over-expression of wild type Stat5b transgene protects NOD mice against diabetes. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer This protection may be mediated by the up-regulation of CD4{sup +}CD25{sup +} Tregs. -- Abstract: The signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) family of proteins play a critical role in cytokine signaling required for fine tuning of immune regulation. Previous reports showed that a mutation (L327M) in the Stat5b protein leads to aberrant cytokine signaling in the NOD mice. To further elaborate the role of Stat5b in diabetes, we established a NOD transgenic mouse that over-expresses the wild type Stat5b gene. The incidences of spontaneous diabetes as well as cyclophosphamide-induced diabetes were significantly reduced and delayed in the Stat5b transgenic NOD mice compared to their littermate controls. The total cell numbers of CD4{sup +} T cells and especially CD8{sup +} T cells in the spleen and pancreatic lymph node were increased in the Stat5b transgenic NOD mice. Consistent with these findings, CD4{sup +} and CD8{sup +} T cells from the Stat5b transgenic NOD mice showed a higher proliferation capacity and up-regulation of multiple cytokines including IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha} and IL-10 as well as anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-xl. Furthermore, the number and proportion of CD4{sup +}CD25{sup +} regulatory T cells were significantly increased in transgenic mice although in vitro suppression ability of the regulatory T-cells was not affected by the transgene. Our results suggest that Stat5b confers protection against diabetes in the NOD mice by regulating the numbers and function of multiple immune cell types, especially by up-regulating CD4{sup +}CD25{sup +} regulatory T cells.

Jin, Yulan; Purohit, Sharad [Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Health Sciences University, GA (United States) [Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Health Sciences University, GA (United States); Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Health Sciences University, GA (United States); Chen, Xueqin; Yi, Bing [Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Health Sciences University, GA (United States)] [Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Health Sciences University, GA (United States); She, Jin-Xiong, E-mail: jshe@georgiahealth.edu [Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Health Sciences University, GA (United States) [Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Health Sciences University, GA (United States); Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Health Sciences University, GA (United States)

2012-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

246

Summary of the California Energy Commission's Renewables Portfolio  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Summary of the California Energy Commission's Renewables Portfolio Standard Contractor Reports, and the Status of Renewables Portfolio Standard Contracting and Regulation Prepared For: California Energy Director, Renewable Energy Program Drake Johnson Office Manager Renewable Energy Office Valerie Hall Deputy

247

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Keywords: California Energy Commission, cool roofs, lowsloped roofs, solar reflectance, thermal emittanceCalifornia Energy Commission STAFF REPORT DRAFT EVALUATION REPORT 2008 Building Energy Layer DECEMBER 2012 CEC4002012018SD CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor #12

248

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT 20142015 INVESTMENT PLAN UPDATE FOR THE ALTERNATIVE AND RENEWABLE FUEL AND VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM OCTOBER 2013 CEC6002013003SD CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Charles Smith Primary

249

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT5002011029 #12; CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Janna Franks Primary Author Janna Franks Project members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily

250

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT-2010-020 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Janna Franks Primary Author Steve Williams Senior Technical members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily

251

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY EFFICIENT APPLIANCE REBATE PROGRAM GUIDELINES FOURTH EDITION ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION DECEMBER 16, 2009 AMENDED MARCH 24 Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12; i CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas

252

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY EFFICIENT APPLIANCE REBATE PROGRAM GUIDELINES SECOND THIRD EDITION ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION DECEMBER 16, 2009 AMENDED MARCH and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12; i CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas Chairman James D

253

Regulatory Oversight of the Legacy Gunner Uranium Mine and Mill Site in Northern Saskatchewan, Canada - 13434  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As Canada's nuclear regulator, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) is responsible for licensing all aspects of uranium mining, including remediation activities at legacy sites. Since these sites already existed when the current legislation came into force in 2000, and the previous legislation did not apply, they present a special case. The Nuclear Safety and Control Act (NSCA), was written with cradle-to- grave oversight in mind. Applying the NSCA at the end of a 'facilities' life-cycle poses some challenges to both the regulator and the proponent. When the proponent is the public sector, even more challenges can present themselves. Although the licensing process for legacy sites is no different than for any other CNSC license, assuring regulatory compliance can be more complicated. To demonstrate how the CNSC has approached the oversight of legacy sites the history of the Commission's involvement with the Gunnar uranium mine and mill site provides a good case study. The lessons learned from the CNSC's experience regulating the Gunnar site will benefit those in the future who will need to regulate legacy sites under existing or new legislation. (authors)

Stenson, Ron; Howard, Don [Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, P.O. Box 1046, Station B, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa ON K1P 5S9 (Canada)] [Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, P.O. Box 1046, Station B, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa ON K1P 5S9 (Canada)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Ohio River Greenway Development Commission (Indiana) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ohio River Greenway Development Commission (Indiana) Ohio River Greenway Development Commission (Indiana) Ohio River Greenway Development Commission (Indiana) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Indiana Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Ohio River Greenway Commission

255

River Basins Advisory Commissions (South Carolina) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

River Basins Advisory Commissions (South Carolina) River Basins Advisory Commissions (South Carolina) River Basins Advisory Commissions (South Carolina) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State South Carolina Program Type Environmental Regulations Provider Catawba Wateree River Basin Advisory Commission

256

Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) < Back Eligibility Utility Commercial Agricultural Investor-Owned Utility State/Provincial Govt Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Installer/Contractor Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Systems Integrator Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Program Info Start Date 1961 State Delaware Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Project Review Section The Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) is a federal-interstate compact government agency that was formed by concurrent legislation enacted in 1961 by the United States and the four basin states (Pennsylvania, New York, New

257

Lake George Park Commission: Stormwater Management (New York) | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lake George Park Commission: Stormwater Management (New York) Lake George Park Commission: Stormwater Management (New York) Lake George Park Commission: Stormwater Management (New York) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State New York Program Type Environmental Regulations Provider Lake George Park Commission

258

South Dakota-Minnesota Boundary Waters Commission (Minnesota) | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Dakota-Minnesota Boundary Waters Commission (Minnesota) Dakota-Minnesota Boundary Waters Commission (Minnesota) South Dakota-Minnesota Boundary Waters Commission (Minnesota) < Back Eligibility Utility Fed. Government Commercial Agricultural Investor-Owned Utility State/Provincial Govt Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Residential Installer/Contractor Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Low-Income Residential Schools Retail Supplier Institutional Multi-Family Residential Systems Integrator Fuel Distributor Nonprofit General Public/Consumer Transportation Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Minnesota Program Type Environmental Regulations This section establishes an interstate commission to set standards for

259

Chapter 9: Commissioning the Building  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

: : Commissioning the Building Commissioning Process Overview Commissioning Activities and Documentation LANL | Chapter 9 Commissioning the Building Commissioning Process Overview Commissioning is a process - a systematic process of ensuring that a building performs in accordance with the design intent, contract documents, and the owner's operational needs. Commissioning is fundamental to the success of the whole-building design process. Due to the sophistication of building designs and the com- plexity of building systems constructed today, commis- sioning is necessary, but not automatically included as part of the typical design and contracting process. Commissioning is critical for ensuring that the building design is successfully constructed and operated.

260

Regulatory Burden RFI from Bodine Electric Company | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

from Bodine Electric Company Regulatory Burden RFI from Bodine Electric Company The following is a response from Bodine Electric Company on unnecessarily burdensome regulations...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Variable Renewable Energy: a Regulatory Roadmap (Fact Sheet)...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Variable Renewable Energy: a Regulatory Roadmap Research Highlights There is not a one-size-fits-all approach to the regulation of variable renewable energy (VRE), but...

262

Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Fifth RFI  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy(Department or DOE) is...

263

GRR/Section 7 - Power Plant Siting, Construction, and Regulation Overview |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 7 - Power Plant Siting, Construction, and Regulation Overview GRR/Section 7 - Power Plant Siting, Construction, and Regulation Overview < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7 - Power Plant Siting, Construction, and Regulation Overview 07PowerPlantSitingConstructionOverview (2).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07PowerPlantSitingConstructionOverview (2).pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative The power plant's location, size, type of customer the power plant sells energy to, and whether the power plant sells energy in "interstate

264

California Energy Commission PRELIMINARY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission PRELIMINARY STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES JULY 16, 2009 CEC-150 Recovery and Reinvestment Act State Energy Program Guidelines 5 A. Background ....................................................................................................................... 12 R. Reallocation of Funds

265

Unique Regulatory Approach for Licensing the Port Hope Remediation Project in Canada - 13315  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Port Hope remediation project is a part of a larger initiative of the Canadian Federal Government the Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) which is based upon a community proposal. The Government of Canada, through Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is investing $1.28 billion over 10 years to clean up historic low-level radioactive waste in the Port Hope Area and to provide long-term safe management of the low-level radioactive wastes in the Port Hope Area. These wastes arose from the activities of a former Federal Crown Corporation (Eldorado Nuclear) and its private sector predecessors. In Canada, historic waste are defined as low-level radioactive waste that was managed in a manner no longer considered acceptable, but for which the original producer cannot reasonably be held responsible or no longer exists and for which the Federal Government has accepted responsibility. In Canada, under the current regulatory framework, the environmental remediation is not considered as a distinct phase of the nuclear cycle. The regulatory approach for dealing with existing sites contaminated with radioactive residues is defined on the basis of risk and application of existing regulations. A unique regulatory approach was taken by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to address the various licensing issues and to set out the requirements for licensing of the Port Hope Project within the current regulatory framework. (authors)

Kostova, M.; Howard, D.; Elder, P. [Directorate of Nuclear Cycle and Facilities Regulation, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, 280, Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 (Canada)] [Directorate of Nuclear Cycle and Facilities Regulation, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, 280, Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 (Canada)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

Lessons Learned... and Not Learned: A Case Study in Regulatory Evolution  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

'Are you better off than you were four years ago?' 'You've come a long way, baby.' Eschewing politics and advertising, these idioms are applied to the evolution of regulatory processes for Decontamination and Decommissioning (D and D) of nuclear facilities. We use a case study of a (nearly) completed D and D project at a large nuclear fuel manufacturing facility, to chronicle one licensee's experience with US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) D and D regulations from the 1990's to the present. Historical milestones include the birth of a D and D project, a false start and resultant consequences, a D and D 'moratorium' with subsequent planning and stakeholder integration, a second start which included the challenge of parallel path D and D physical work and regulatory processes, and the 'lessons learned' contributions to timely project progress. Further discussion includes a look at the 'declaration of victory' and examines what it really means to be finished. The rich contextual experience from the case study and the observations of other industry members provides the basis for answers to several key questions: How far has the regulatory process for D and D really evolved, and in what direction? Are licensees generally satisfied or dissatisfied with the methods? What has not improved? Which improvements looked promising, but languished in recent years? How far have we really come and are we better off? What are the opportunities for further improvement? The summary answer to each question, using compendious engineering terms is... 'it depends'. (authors)

Conant, J. F. [ABB Inc., 2000 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT 06095 (United States); Woodard, R. C. [TLG Services/Entergy, 148 New Milford Road East, Bridgewater, CT 06752 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

STATE OF CALIFORNIA --NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: SERVICE ON THE CHIEF COUNSEL PURPOSE OF THIS FORM: Energy Commission regulations found in Title 20 on the Chief Counsel. This form is available at the Docket Unit counter and on the Energy Commission website at [www.energy.ca.gov/commission/chief_counsel/docket.html]. Please see the Instructions that accompany

268

Definition: Regulation Service | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Service Service Jump to: navigation, search Dictionary.png Regulation Service The process whereby one Balancing Authority contracts to provide corrective response to all or a portion of the ACE of another Balancing Authority. The Balancing Authority providing the response assumes the obligation of meeting all applicable control criteria as specified by NERC for itself and the Balancing Authority for which it is providing the Regulation Service.[1] View on Wikipedia Wikipedia Definition According to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Demand Response (DR) is defined as: "Changes in electric usage by end-use customers from their normal consumption patterns in response to changes in the price of electricity over time, or to incentive payments designed to induce lower

269

Electric holding company regulation by multistate compact  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This article is divided into five sections. The first section discusses the market and regulatory environment of bulk power sales. The second presents the legal framework for compacting and discusses the minimal constitutional barriers presented by the Compact Clause. The next section discusses the economic considerations inherent in attempting to regulate a national activity through regional authorities. The fourth section more fully develops the administrative and political problems that regional regulation must overcome to be successful. Using the legal, economic, and policy framework developed in the preceding sections, the final section analyzes the proposal encompassed in Senate Bill 2607, a proposal by the Arkansas Public Service Commission and Entergy Corporation to create regional organizations to provide integrated resource planning.

Darr, F.P.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

California Public Utilities Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Public Utilities Commission Public Utilities Commission Address 505 Van Ness Avenue Place San Francisco, California Zip 94102 Phone number 415-703-2782 Website http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/puc/ References CPUC Website[1] This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. California Public Utilities Commission is an organization based in San Francisco, California. The CPUC regulates privately owned electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water, railroad, rail transit, and passenger transportation companies, in addition to authorizing video franchises. Our five Governor-appointed Commissioners, as well as our staff, are dedicated to ensuring that consumers have safe, reliable utility service at reasonable rates, protecting against fraud, and promoting the health of California's economy.

271

Illinois Commerce Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Commerce Commission Commerce Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name Illinois Commerce Commission Place Springfield, Illinois Zip 62701 Product Regulator of public utilities and transportation in Illinois. Coordinates 42.640925°, -88.413644° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.640925,"lon":-88.413644,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

272

California Energy Commission BLOCK GRANT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission BLOCK GRANT GUIDELINES (FORMULA-BASED GRANTS) ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION OCTOBER 7, 2009 CEC-150 Grant (EECBG) Program Guidelines 1. Background The California Energy Commission1 (Energy Commission) has

273

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor MARCH 2012 CEC5002012084 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily represent the views

274

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY an Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area including a Regulatory Amendment to rescind regulations (� 675.22, paragraphs c,d,e) that allow

275

Commissioning Team | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commissioning Team Commissioning Team Commissioning Team October 16, 2013 - 4:45pm Addthis Assembling a committed team is a critical part of the commissioning process for renewable energy projects. Members of the team vary based on the size, complexity, and funding mechanism used for the project at hand. The commissioning team lead is a commissioning agent, an independent agent representing the agency's interests. In addition to the commissioning agent, participants in the commissioning process can include the agency, operations and management (O&M) personnel, contractors, subcontractors, and the architectural and engineering (A&E) firm. The project energy lead should also be an active member of the commissioning team and work closely with the commissioning agent. Renewable energy projects often require a team of experts in specific

276

Inferring regulatory networks from multiple sources of genomic data  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(cont.) algorithm to identify the regulatory models from protein-DNA binding and gene expression data. These models to a large extent agree with the knowledge of gene regulation pertaining to the corresponding regulators. ...

Yeang, Chen-Hsiang, 1969-

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

277

Public Utility Regulatory Act, Alternative Energy Providers (Texas) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regulatory Act, Alternative Energy Providers (Texas) Regulatory Act, Alternative Energy Providers (Texas) Public Utility Regulatory Act, Alternative Energy Providers (Texas) < Back Eligibility Utility Fed. Government Commercial Investor-Owned Utility Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Texas Program Type Safety and Operational Guidelines Provider Public Utility Commission of Texas Chapter 35 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act specifically addresses alternative energy providers, and contains provisions designed to aid such providers in selling power in Texas's competitive utility market. The

278

2 CCR State Lands Commission Article 4.1, Leases for Exploration...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: 2 CCR State Lands Commission Article 4.1, Leases for Exploration and Development of Geothermal ResourcesLegal...

279

AAC R14-3 - Corporation Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Corporation Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: AAC R14-3 -...

280

20 AAC 25 Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

20 AAC 25 Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: 20 AAC 25 Alaska Oil...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Proceedings: A Guide for Intervenors  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

U.S. 396 (1961); Vermont Yankee, 435 U.S. 519; Morningsidein two 2. See, e.g. , Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.8th Cir. 1971); and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.

Hansell, Dean

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station as indicated by Reference (1). In Reference (2), Entergy provided the analysis for the reactor pressure vessel feedwater nozzles. In Reference (3), the NRC, in License Condition 4, established the requirement for Entergy to submit the confirmatory analyses for the recirculation outlet nozzle and core spray nozzle at least two years prior to the period of extended operation. In Reference (4), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) ordered Entergy to submit the results of the analysis for the core spray and recirculation outlet nozzles prior to a final ruling of Contentions 2A and 2B. Confirmatory analysis for the recirculation outlet and core spray nozzles was submitted to the NRC and ASLB in Reference (5) on January 15, 2009. Based on recent revisions to the recirculation outlet and core spray nozzle confirmatory

Vermont Yankee

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, January 1995. Volume 41, Number 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This book contains issuances of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards for January 1995. The issuances include Babcock and Wilcox Company materials license; Hydro Resources, Inc. application for uranium mining; low-level waste storage in Utah; communication of emerging and existing generic, technical issues with PWR owners groups; and radioactive waste management by Sierra Nuclear Corporation.

NONE

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D. C...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

d r e s u l t . The r a d i o a c t i v i t y i n t + h e waste - g a s s t o r a g e , tanks. -(WGST) and l i q u i d waste - s t o r a g e t a n k s (LWST) .are- v e r y small...

285

Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

hosted a GNEP Ministerial in Washington, DC, where leaders from China, France, Japan, Russia and the United States agreed to work together to bring the benefits of nuclear energy...

286

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Comments relevant to the following two sections of the RFI: "Long Term Issues: Managing a Grid with High Penetration of New Technologies" and "Reliability and Cyber-Security," US...

287

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, July--December 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Digests and indexes for issuances of the NRC, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, the Administrative Law Judges, the Directors` Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking are presented in this document. These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances. Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are: (1) case name, (2) full text reference, (3) issuance number, (4) issued raised by appellants, (5) legal citations, (6) name of facility and Docket number, (7) subject matter, (8) type of hearing, and (9) type of issuance.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

to change the Visual Quality Objective (VQO) in the area where the Pacific Connector pipeline corridor would cross Big Elk Road, at MP 161.4 in Section 16, T.37S., R.4E.,...

289

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WAWINGTON. D. C....  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

WAWINGTON. D. C. 20555 kpartmnt of Energy Al7N: Dr. W illiam E. Mott. Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division (EP-32) Washington, D.C. 20545 Dear Dr. kbtt: Enclosed...

290

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Revision 1 February 1996  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.1206 of 10 CFR Part 20, "Standards for Protection Against Radiation, " requires that before a planned special RADIATION EXPOSURE A. INTRODUCTION Section 19.12 of 10 CFR Part 19, "Notices, In- structions and Reports in the health protection issues asso- ciated with exposure to radioactive materials or radi- ation, Section 20

Meagher, Mary

291

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Revision 1 February 1996  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.1206 of 10 CFR Part 20, "Standards for Protection Against Radiation," requires that before a planned special OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE A. INTRODUCTION Section 19.12 of 10 CFR Part 19, "Notices, In- structions in the health protection issues asso- ciated with exposure to radioactive materials or radi- ation. Section 20

Rubloff, Gary W.

292

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reducing Regulatory Burden  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Billing Code 6450 01-P Billing Code 6450 01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review," issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The purpose of DOE's review is to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. DATES: Written comments and information are requested on or before 45 days after

293

Commissioning Guidance for ESPCs  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7.2 7.2 Commissioning Guide Commissioning Guidance for ESPCs INTRODUCTION Federal facility managers are challenged daily with maintaining existing federal building stock that is energy inefficient, requires increasing operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses, and often does not achieve the building occupant comfort needed to maintain worker productivity. Additionally, they are faced with congressionally mandated requirements to reduce energy use and O&M expenses, with little capital funding. The Super ESPC program provides a procurement mechanism to allow agencies to acquire performance-based services to implement energy efficient equipment and systems that reduce energy use and O&M expenses through projects designed, installed, financed, and

294

Survey of state regulatory activities on least cost planning for gas utilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Integrated resource planning involves the creation of a process in which supply-side and demand-side options are integrated to create a resource mix that reliably satisfies customers' short-term and long-term energy service needs at the lowest cost. Incorporating the concept of meeting customer energy service needs entails a recognition that customers' costs must be considered along with the utility's costs in the economic analysis of energy options. As applied to gas utilities, an integrated resource plan seeks to balance cost and reliability, and should not be interpreted simply as the search for lowest commodity costs. All state commissions were surveyed to assess the current status of gas planning and demand-side management and to identify significant regulatory issues faced by commissions during the next several years. The survey was to determine the extent to which they have undertaken least-cost planning for gas utilities. The survey included the following topics: (1) status of state PUC least-cost planning regulations and practices for gas utilities; (2) type and scope ofnatural gas DSM programs in effect, includeing fuel substitution; (3) economic tests and analysis methods used to evaluate DSM programs; (4) relationship between prudence reviews of gas utility purchasing practices and integrated resource planning; and (5) key regulatory issues facing gas utilities during the next five years. 34 refs., 6 figs., 10 tabs.

Goldman, C.A. (Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (United States) National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Washington, DC (United States)); Hopkins, M.E. (Fleming Group, Washington, DC (United States))

1991-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Competition COMPETITIVE CHALLENGE IN NETWORK INDUSTRIES  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: & Responsiveness to Competition % Transmission Pricing and Regulation & Universal Service % Regulatory Reform Who

Lin, Xiaodong

296

The Environmental Protection Agency's Safety Standards for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Potential Path Forward in Response to the Report of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future - 13388  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Following the decision to withdraw the Yucca Mountain license application, the Department of Energy created a Blue Ribbon Commission (BRC) on America's Nuclear Future, tasked with recommending a national strategy to manage the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. The BRC issued its final report in January 2012, with recommendations covering transportation, storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF); potential reprocessing; and supporting institutional measures. The BRC recommendations on disposal of SNF and high-level waste (HLW) are relevant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which shares regulatory responsibility with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC): EPA issues 'generally applicable' performance standards for disposal repositories, which are then implemented in licensing. For disposal, the BRC endorses developing one or more geological repositories, with siting based on an approach that is adaptive, staged and consent-based. The BRC recommends that EPA and NRC work cooperatively to issue generic disposal standards-applying equally to all sites-early in any siting process. EPA previously issued generic disposal standards that apply to all sites other than Yucca Mountain. However, the BRC concluded that the existing regulations should be revisited and revised. The BRC proposes a number of general principles to guide the development of future regulations. EPA continues to review the BRC report and to assess the implications for Agency action, including potential regulatory issues and considerations if EPA develops new or revised generic disposal standards. This review also involves preparatory activities to define potential process and public engagement approaches. (authors)

Forinash, Betsy; Schultheisz, Daniel; Peake, Tom [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Radiation Protection Division (United States)] [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Radiation Protection Division (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Regulatory analysis technical evaluation handbook. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this Handbook is to provide guidance to the regulatory analyst to promote preparation of quality regulatory analysis documents and to implement the policies of the Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG/BR-0058 Rev. 2). This Handbook expands upon policy concepts included in the NRC Guidelines and translates the six steps in preparing regulatory analyses into implementable methodologies for the analyst. It provides standardized methods of preparation and presentation of regulatory analyses, with the inclusion of input that will satisfy all backfit requirements and requirements of NRC`s Committee to Review Generic Requirements. Information on the objectives of the safety goal evaluation process and potential data sources for preparing a safety goal evaluation is also included. Consistent application of the methods provided here will result in more directly comparable analyses, thus aiding decision-makers in evaluating and comparing various regulatory actions. The handbook is being issued in loose-leaf format to facilitate revisions. NRC intends to periodically revise the handbook as new and improved guidance, data, and methods become available.

NONE

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

U.S. Nuclear Regulation Data (Information Digest, 2010 - 2011) | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Nuclear Regulation Data (Information Digest, 2010 - 2011) Nuclear Regulation Data (Information Digest, 2010 - 2011) Dataset Summary Description The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) publishes an Information Digest containing summary information about the NRC and its industry. The report's appendices include demographic data on U.S. nuclear power reactors, both commercial and test facilities. Details include licensee data, location, and capacity. In addition there is information on dry spent fuel storage. The data include activities through 2009 or the most current data available. Source U.S. Nuclear Reactor Commission (USNRC) Date Released August 31st, 2010 (4 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords nuclear Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon US Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors (xls, 132.6 KiB) application/vnd.ms-excel icon US Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors, Permanently Shutdown (xls, 32.8 KiB)

299

SPEAR 3 Commissioning Software  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The short SPEAR 3 startup time required precommissioned software for machine setup, beam measurements and data analysis. To accomplish this goal, we used Matlab with the Accelerator Toolbox (AT), the Channel Access Toolbox (MCA) and Middle Layer software to integrate code and streamline production. This paper outlines the software architecture, describes the Middle Layer component and provides examples from SPEAR 3 commissioning.

Corbett, W.J.; Portmann, G.J.; Safranek, J.A.; Terebilo, A.; /SLAC, SSRL

2005-05-09T23:59:59.000Z

300

California Energy Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission: Although External Factors Have Caused Delays in Its Approval of Sites, Its Application Process Is Reasonable August 2001 2001-118 CaliforniaStateAuditor BUREAUOFSTATEAUDITS #12;The first five copies of each California State Auditor report are free. Additional copies are $3

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Natural England Forestry Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Briefing Natural England Forestry Commission Environment Agency Slowing the Flow in Pickering - Flood Storage Option Background Following work by the Environment Agency, investigating the feasibility) reservoir, however, as the design progressed the Reservoir Panel Engineer assessed the design as being high

302

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION TRABUCONIGUEL  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION N.N. FLANCO KEMPSTER RERC GLEN AVON TRABUCONIGUEL CROWN COYGEN KENTER HILLS TELEGRAPH ARTESIA BOVINE SOQUEL PEYTON PLASTIC OLS ENERGY CHINO CIMGEN CHINO PEDLEY ARCHIBALD STATION K (OLYMPIC) STATION 11 SAWTELLE MWD VENICE CULVER SONY HYPERION N.N. LOSULFUR POLARIS STATION L

303

Commissioning and Retro Commissioning Programs for Energy Efficiency  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Title Slide Commissioning and Retro Commissioning Programs for Energy Efficiency International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations, New York City Amit Kulkarni, Senior Engineer, National Grid www.powerofaction.com/efficiency 2... Presentation Goals ?Overview of National Grid?s Commissioning Program ?Types of Commissioning Programs ?Customer Examples www.powerofaction.com/efficiency 3 National Grid?s Energy Efficiency Programs Our commercial & industrial programs are designed...

Kuklarni, A.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

The use of probabilistic risk assessment to satisfy the Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s maintenance rule  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Maintenance and inspection at nuclear power plants consumes a large portion of a utility`s resources, making resource allocation for such procedures vital. The NRC Maintenance Rule, due to be implemented in July of 1996, requires utilities to select systems, structures, and components (SSCS) important to safety and to develop a monitoring program to ensure that these SSCs are capable of fulfilling their intended functions. In light of these concerns, two ratios were developed to compare the risk significance of individual components with the amount of plant staff time, or burden, associated with inspecting the component. These risk/burden ratios point out existing disparities between current inspection practices and safety concerns. These ratios can be used to develop new inspection schedules constituting a more equitable risk to burden distribution.

Dubord, R.M. [Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Cambridge, MA (United States). Dept. of Nuclear Engineering

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMPARISON California's Building Energy Efficiency Standards and the International Energy Conservation Code and American Society America Standard 90.1 JULY 2013 CEC4002013009 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr

306

Developing a Regulatory Framework for Extended Storage and Transportation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Developing a Regulatory Framework Developing a Regulatory Framework for Extended Storage and Transportation National Transportation Stakeholders Forum May 10-12, 2011 Denver, Colorado Earl Easton Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Outline * Current Regulatory Framework * Future Regulatory Needs * Technical Basis (with some examples) * Path Forward 2 Current NRC Regulatory Framework for Storage * Renewable Term Licenses * Aging Management Plan - Time-limited aging analyses - Design for prevention - Monitoring - how, how often, in-situ - Maintenance - what type - Corrective Actions - when 3 Dry Cask Storage * 63 licensed ISFSIs (8 more than 2010) * Expect 10 sites pursuing General License * Over 1400 loaded storage casks 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Number of ISFSIs Year Specific Licensees

307

July 18, 2014 Commission Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This meeting was the inaugural meeting of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission). The Commission members heard opening remarks by Secretary...

308

Commission Meeting- October 6, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This was the third meeting of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Labs.

309

California Energy Commission BLOCK GRANT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission REVISED BLOCK GRANT GUIDELINES (FORMULA-BASED GRANTS) ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR CONSIDERATION FOR ADOPTION BY THE CALIF. ENERGY COMMISSION and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program Guidelines 1. Background The California Energy Commission1 (Energy

310

TATE OF CALIFORNI NERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

s Policy Report on AB 1890 Renewables Funding, Publication No. P500-97-002. All Energy Commission reportsResults SecondEdition GUIDEBOOK RENEWABLEENERGYPROGRAM RENEWABLE ENERGY PROGRAM #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 20001975 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Gray Davis, Governor JULY 2000 P500-97-011V2B Volume2B NEW RENEWABLE

311

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT STATUS OF THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT5002010037 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Leah Mohney Primary Author Project Manager Steve Williams Senior was prepared by staff of the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views

312

Commissioning for High Performance  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

? Systems to be commissioned Typically less than 1% of total construction cost ESL-KT-13-12-46 CATEE 2013: Clean Air Through Energy Efficiency Conference, San Antonio, Texas Dec. 16-18 Sustainable Bldg Guidelines & Best Practices US Green Building... Council ? LEED European Green Building Councils ? BREEAM Estidama ? Pearl Rating System World Green Building Council ? No independent rating system ESL-KT-13-12-46 CATEE 2013: Clean Air Through Energy Efficiency Conference, San Antonio, Texas Dec...

Meline, K.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

Commissioning Specifications | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Specifications Specifications Commissioning Specifications October 16, 2013 - 4:44pm Addthis Commissioning specifications outline basic requirements of the commissioning process and detail the roles and responsibilities of each party involved. System checklists, startup requirements, and performance testing procedures are typically included in the specifications to let contractors know what standards are required during the various testing phases involved throughout the commissioning process. Since renewable energy technologies are changing and developing rapidly, it is critical to have the commissioning specifications developed by a well-informed resource with up-to-date renewable energy expertise. This resource must also have a thorough understanding of how renewable energy

314

Commissioning Process | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commissioning Process Commissioning Process Commissioning Process October 7, 2013 - 9:19am Addthis The commissioning process for Federal facilities generally follows a four-step process. This process holds true across all forms of commissioning and for both new and existing buildings. Step 1: Planning The planning step includes developing and agreeing upon the overall commissioning objectives and strategies, assembling the project team, and compiling and perusing building and equipment documentation. Objectives for this step include: Optimizing building operations to reduce operating costs Addressing complaints from occupants regarding air quality or comforts Creating a model facility Improving facility operations and maintenance (O&M) and reducing emergency calls. When forming the commissioning team, considerations could include

315

Regulation of naturally occurring radioactive materials in Australia  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......provide an overview of the regulatory approach to managing...been variation in the regulatory approach to implement...makes provision for plans to manage occupational...ARPANSA commissioned a review of operations involving...process to identify when regulatory control is appropriate......

Cameron Jeffries; Riaz Akber; Andrew Johnston; Brad Cassels

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

Speakers: Howard K. Gruenspecht, EIA Shahid Chaudhry, California Energy Commission  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

10: "The Energy-Water Nexus: Availability and Impacts" 10: "The Energy-Water Nexus: Availability and Impacts" Speakers: Howard K. Gruenspecht, EIA Shahid Chaudhry, California Energy Commission M. Michael Hightower, Sandia National Laboratories James Richenderfer, Susquehanna River Basin Commission Jeff C. Wright, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Note: Recorders did not pick up introduction of panel (see biographies for details on the panelists) or introduction of session.] Howard Gruenspecht: Okay, we're going to try to get underway here. We're still catching up on schedule from yesterday lunch, but I think we're making it back. Well, good morning, and welcome to the conference session on the Energy-Water Nexus. I'm Howard Gruenspecht, your moderator. Since it's going to be one of the last two

317

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

318

Colorado/Transmission/Regulatory Overview | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Colorado/Transmission/Regulatory Overview < Colorado‎ | Transmission Jump to: navigation, search Colorado Transmission Transmission Regulatory Overview Roadmap State Data Regulatory Overview General Transmission Permitting at a Glance In Colorado, local governments (counties and municipalities) have the authority to site high-voltage transmission lines. The State's authority in siting is limited to a backstop appeal process, by which utilities may submit an appeal to local government decisions to the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for review and resolution.

319

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

320

Regulatory Oversight Program, July 1, 1993--March 3, 1997. Volume 2: Appendices  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On July, 1993, a Regulatory Oversight (RO) organization was established within the US DOE, Oak Ridge Operations to provide regulatory oversight of the DOE uranium enrichment facilities leased to the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC). The purpose of the OR program was to ensure continued plant safety, safeguards and security while the plants were transitioned to regulatory oversight by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Volume 2 contains copies of the documents which established the relationship between NRC, DOE, USEC, and DOL (Dept of Labor) required to facilitate regulatory oversight transition.

NONE

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Tsunami Information Sources: Part 4 (With a section on impulsively generated waves by a rapid mass movement, either submerged, or into a body of water)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Division of Inspection and Support Programs, Standard Review Plan

Wiegel, Robert L.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Chapter 25 - Regulatory Approval and Compliances for Biotechnology Products  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Clear regulatory planning during the early stages of product development is essential to develop a focused regulatory strategy that can be presented to national regulatory authorities (NRAs). \\{NRAs\\} regulate pharmaceutical products to enable patient access to high-quality, safe, and effective products, and restrict access to those products that are unsafe or have limited clinical use. Regulatory procedures affect all stages of biomedical product development. Detailed safety review during research and development stages, regulatory approval, and legal registration are necessary stages of product development. When appropriately implemented, regulation ensures public health benefit and the safety of patients, healthcare workers, and the broader community. Therefore, it is critical that developers of biomedical products (drugs, biologics, devices, invitro diagnostics, or some combination) possess the knowledge and awareness of the regulatory challenges and opportunities to expedite the development of safe and effective products in a cost-effective manner.

Norman W. Baylor

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Commissioning Plan RM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Checkout, Testing, and Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O Ch 0 OFFICE OF heckout, T C CD-1 F ENVIRON Standard R Testing, a Revi Critical Decis CD-2 Ma NMENTAL Review Plan and Com iew Module sion (CD) Ap CD arch 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) mmissioni e pplicability D-3 EMENT ing Plan CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-1189-2008,

324

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

' ' ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Frank K. Pittman, Director, bivisioa of Waste &&gement and s- portation, Headquarters j CONTAMItUTED RX-AEC-OWNED OR LEASED FACILITIES' This memorandum responds to your TWX certain information on the above subject. the documentation necessary to answer your available due to the records disposal vailing at the time of release or From records that are available and from disc&ions with most familiar with the transfer operations, &have the current radiological conditibn of transferred property is adequate under present standards. The following tabulations follow the format suggested in your TWX and are grouped to an operations or contract r+ponsibility. A,I Ex-AEC Storage Sites - I r:/ National Stockpile Site '(NSS) and OperatEonal

325

On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates Speaker(s): Richard Morgenstern Date: December 10, 2013 - 12:00pm - 1:00pm Location: 90-3122 Seminar Host/Point of Contact: Alan Sanstad Margaret Taylor Over the past several decades, the U.S. has seen a gradual reduction in economic regulation and a simultaneous increase in safety, health, environmental, and other social regulations. Especially with the prospect of regulation on greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, there is growing concern about the costs, effectiveness, and benefits of federal rules. While prospective or ex ante analyses of the benefits and costs of major federal regulations are now a standard part of government operations, retrospective or ex post analyses, focusing on measurements of actual

326

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds 1031 regulations (1) Alaska (1) analysis (3) appropriations (1) BHFS (3) Categorical Exclusions (3) citation (1) citing (1) Colorado (2) Coordinating Permit Office (2) Cost Mechanisms (2) Cost Recovery (2) CX (1) D.C. (1) data (1) Database (1) developer (2) EA (1) EIS (1) endangered species (1) Fauna (1) feedback (1) Fish and Wildlife (1) Flora (1) flora and fauna (1) 1 2 3 next › last » Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12)

327

COMMISSION REPORT 20122013 INVESTMENT PLAN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

COMMISSION REPORT 20122013 INVESTMENT PLAN UPDATE FOR THE ALTERNATIVE AND RENEWABLE FUEL, and diesel substitute fuels. State investment is necessary to fill the gap and fund the differential cost the Energy Commission to adopt an investment plan that describes how funding will complement existing public

328

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT TRANSPORTATION FUEL PRICE CASES AND DEMAND SCENARIOS and alternative fuel penetration goals of the state. Keywords: California fuel price forecasts, transportation Eggers. 2011. California Energy Commission. CEC-600-2011-001. Transportation Fuel Price Cases and Demand

329

Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Commissioning Commissioning Process to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Federal Requirements Program Management Commissioning Types Process Metering Computerized Maintenance Management Systems Maintenance Types Major Equipment Types Resources Contacts Greenhouse Gases

330

From plan to practice: implementing SB 617, California's regulatory review reform.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??SB 617 (Calderon & Pavley, 2011) is an ambitious experiment to improve state regulations and increase government transparency. The statute reforms Californias regulatory review process (more)

Marin, Angela K.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory Test Exercise: Output  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory Test Exercise: Output Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory Test Exercise: Output Report Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory Test Exercise: Output Report Focus Area: Clean Fossil Energy Topics: Market Analysis Website: cdn.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/publications/7326/carbo Equivalent URI: cleanenergysolutions.org/content/carbon-capture-transport-and-storage- Policies: Regulations Regulations: Emissions Mitigation Scheme The Scottish Government published this report to identify regulatory gaps or overlaps in the nation's framework for regulating carbon capture and storage (CCS). The report aims to streamline and better manage CCS regulation. It focuses on evaluating the risks, barriers, information gaps,

332

A Comparison of International Regulatory Organizations and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A Comparison of International Regulatory Organizations and Licensing Procedures for New Nuclear the safety regulation and the licensing of new nuclear power plants. The paper considers both design safety approval and issues of site licensing. Advice from international organisations is summarised. Nuclear power

Aickelin, Uwe

333

Texas State Regulations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Texas Texas State Regulations: Texas State of Texas The Railroad Commission of Texas (RCC), through the Oil and Gas Division, administers oil and gas exploration, development, and production operations, except for oil and gas leasing, royalty payments, surface damages through oil and gas operations, and operator-landowner contracts. The RCC and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), formerly, the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC), have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding clarifying jurisdiction over oil field wastes generated in connection with oil and gas exploration, development, and production. The RCC Oil and Gas Division operates nine district offices, each staffed with field enforcement and support personnel.

334

September 15, 2014 Lab Commission Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This meeting was the second meeting of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission). The Commission members heard opening remarks by Co-Chairs TJ...

335

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT REPORT BENEFITS REPORT FOR THE ALTERNATIVE goals and alternative fuel use goals." Assembly Bill 109 also requires the Energy Commission AND RENEWABLE FUEL AND VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown, Jr

336

California Energy Commission PROPOSED AMENDED STANDARDS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission PROPOSED AMENDED STANDARDS NONRESIDENTIAL ACCEPTANCE TESTING ENERGY COMMISSION Martha Brook Project Manager & Principal Author Eurlyne Geiszler Staff members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily

337

California Energy Commission SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor MAY 2012 CEC4002012002SP #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Joe Loyer Primary Author Maziar Shirakh, P.E. Project Manager

338

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT REPORT RENEWABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD 20082010 ENERGY COMMISSION Gina Barkalow Theresa Daniels James Haile Primary Authors Gina Barkalow Project Manager with contributions from the following: California Energy Commission Gabe Herrera Mark Kootstra Michael Nyberg

339

October 6, 2014 Lab Commission Meeting Minutes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission) was convened for its third meeting at 9:00 AM on October 6, 2014. The Commission members heard a DOE...

340

Improving CS regulations.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

President Carter issued Executive Order 12044 (3/28/78) that required all Federal agencies to distinguish between significant and insignificant regulations, and to determine whether a regulation will result in major impacts. This study gathered information on the impact of the order and the guidelines on the Office of Conservation and Solar Energy (CS) regulatory practices, investigated problems encountered by the CS staff when implementing the order and guidelines, and recommended solutions to resolve these problems. Major tasks accomplished and discussed are: (1) legislation, Executive Orders, and DOE Memoranda concerning Federal administrative procedures relevant to the development and analysis of regulations within CS reviewed; (2) relevant DOE Orders and Memoranda analyzed and key DOE and CS staff interviewed in order to accurately describe the current CS regulatory process; (3) DOE staff from the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of Policy and Evaluation, the Office of the Environment, and the Office of the Secretary interviewed to explore issues and problems encountered with current CS regulatory practices; (4) the regulatory processes at five other Federal agencies reviewed in order to see how other agencies have approached the regulatory process, dealt with specific regulatory problems, and responded to the Executive Order; and (5) based on the results of the preceding four tasks, recommendations for potential solutions to the CS regulatory problems developed. (MCW)

Nesse, R.J.; Scheer, R.M.; Marasco, A.L.; Furey, R.

1980-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Types of Commissioning | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Types of Commissioning Types of Commissioning Types of Commissioning October 7, 2013 - 9:17am Addthis Several commissioning types exist to address the specific needs of equipment and systems across both new and existing buildings. The following commissioning types provide a good overview. New Building Commissioning New building commissioning happens during the design and construction of new facilities. The process ensures that systems and equipment in new buildings operate properly. This is done through design reviews, functional testing, system documentation, and operator training. Federal agencies should consider new building commissioning when building new facilities or undergoing major facility renovations. The process is best implemented through all phases of construction.

342

Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined Heat and Power Fuel Cell System Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined Heat and Power Fuel...

343

Mississippi Public Service Commission Adopts Energy Efficiency...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mississippi Public Service Commission Adopts Energy Efficiency Rules Mississippi Public Service Commission Adopts Energy Efficiency Rules November 8, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis...

344

Arizona Corporation Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name: Arizona Corporation Commission Abbreviation: ACC Service Territory: Arizona Website: http:www.azcc.gov EIA Form 861 Data This...

345

State Historical Resources Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Historical Resources Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name: State Historical Resources Commission Address: 1725 23rd Street, Suite 100 Place: Sacramento, CA Zip: 95816...

346

Oregon Public Utility Commission | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oregon Public Utility Commission Oregon Public Utility Commission Offer comments on the United States Department of Energy Smart Grid Request for Information (RFI). Oregon Public...

347

State Land Commission FAQ | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Commission FAQ Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: State Land Commission FAQ Abstract Frequently Asked Questions, California State Land...

348

Regulatory requirements and tools for environmental assessment of hazardous wastes: Understanding tribal and stakeholder concerns using Department of Energy sites  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Many US governmental and Tribal Nation agencies, as well as state and local entities, deal with hazardous wastes within regulatory frameworks that require specific environmental assessments. In this paper we use Department of Energy (DOE) sites as examples to examine the relationship between regulatory requirements and environmental assessments for hazardous waste sites and give special attention to how assessment tools differ. We consider federal laws associated with environmental protection include the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), as well as regulations promulgated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Tribal Nations and state agencies. These regulatory regimes require different types of environmental assessments and remedial investigations, dose assessments and contaminant pathways. The DOE case studies illustrate the following points: 1) there is often understandable confusion about what regulatory requirements apply to the site resources, and what environmental assessments are required by each, 2) the messages sent on site safety issued by different regulatory agencies are sometimes contradictory or confusing (e.g.Oak Ridge Reservation), 3) the regulatory frameworks being used to examine the same question can be different, leading to different conclusions (e.g. Brookhaven National Laboratory), 4) computer models used in support of groundwater models or risk assessments are not necessarily successful in convincing Native Americans and others that there is no possibility of risk from contaminants (e.g. Amchitka Island), 5) when given the opportunity to choose between relying on a screening risk assessments or waiting for a full site-specific analysis of contaminants in biota, the screening risk assessment option is rarely selected (e.g. Amchitka, Hanford Site), and finally, 6) there needs to be agreement on whether there has been adequate characterization to support the risk assessment (e.g. Hanford). The assessments need to be transparent and to accommodate different opinions about the relationship between characterizations and risk assessments. This paper illustrates how many of the problems at DOE sites, and potentially at other sites in the U.S. and elsewhere, derive from a lack of either understanding of, or consensus about, the regulatory process, including the timing and types of required characterizations and data in support of site characterizations and risk assessments.

Joanna Burger; Charles Powers; Michael Gochfeld

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

Regulatory Guide 5.29, Revision 2, "Special Nuclear Material Control and Accounting Systems for Nuclear Power Plants".  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION June 2013 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION June 2013 Revision 2 REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH Written suggestions regarding this guide or development of new guides may be submitted through the NRC's public Web site under the Regulatory Guides document collection of the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/contactus.html. Electronic copies of this regulatory guide, previous versions of this guide, and other recently issued guides are available through the NRC's public Web site under the Regulatory Guides document collection of the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/. The regulatory guide is also available through the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at

350

Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities The Advanced Instrumentation, Information, and Control (II&C) Systems Technologies pathway of the Light Water Reactor Sustainability(LWRS) Program conducts a vigorous engagement strategy with the U.S. nuclear power industry, including the nuclear operating companies, major support organizations, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and suppliers. The goal of this engagement strategy is to develop a shared vision and common understanding across the nuclear industry of the need for II&C modernization, the performance improvement that can be obtained, and the opportunities for collaboration to enact this vision. The primary means of engaging the nuclear operating companies is through a

351

Regulatory guidance for lightning protection in nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was engaged by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) to develop the technical basis for regulatory guidance to address design and implementation practices for lightning protection systems in nuclear power plants (NPPs). Lightning protection is becoming increasingly important with the advent of digital and low-voltage analog systems in NPPs. These systems have the potential to be more vulnerable than older analog systems to the resulting power surges and electromagnetic interference (EMI) when lightning strikes facilities or power lines. This paper discusses the technical basis for guidance to licensees and applicants covered in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.204, Guidelines for Lightning Protection of Nuclear Power Plants, issued August 2005. RG 1.204 describes guidance for practices that are acceptable to the NRC staff for protecting nuclear power structures and systems from direct lightning strikes and the resulting secondary effects. (authors)

Kisner, R. A.; Wilgen, J. B.; Ewing, P. D.; Korsah, K. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P. O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6007 (United States); Antonescu, C. E. [U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

352

Regulatory Guidance for Lightning Protection in Nuclear Power Plants  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Abstract - Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was engaged by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) to develop the technical basis for regulatory guidance to address design and implementation practices for lightning protection systems in nuclear power plants (NPPs). Lightning protection is becoming increasingly important with the advent of digital and low-voltage analog systems in NPPs. These systems have the potential to be more vulnerable than older analog systems to the resulting power surges and electromagnetic interference (EMI) when lightning strikes facilities or power lines. This paper discusses the technical basis for guidance to licensees and applicants covered in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.204, Guidelines for Lightning Protection of Nuclear Power Plants, issued August 2005. RG 1.204 describes guidance for practices that are acceptable to the NRC staff for protecting nuclear power structures and systems from direct lightning strikes and the resulting secondary effects.

Kisner, Roger A [ORNL; Wilgen, John B [ORNL; Ewing, Paul D [ORNL; Korsah, Kofi [ORNL; Antonescu, Christina E [ORNL

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

353

Commission Meeting- November 4, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories AgendaArgonne National LaboratoryTCS Conference Center9700 S. Cass AveArgonne, IL 60436November 4, 2014

354

REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

recommendations rest. The Commission's staff, Lowell Price and Mary Jane Reese, have a special claim on our by developing courses that focus on the historical evolution and comparative analysis of cultural traditions

Ford, James

355

ENERGY COMMISSION Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Valley (Solar Two) Energy Project AFC Committee as part of Imperial Valley (Solar Two) Energy Project Member RAOUL RENAUD Hearing Officer This report was prepared by the California Energy Commission Imperial

356

Rivanna River Basin Commission (Virginia)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Rivanna River Basin Commission is an independent local entity tasked with providing guidance for the stewardship and enhancement of the water quality and natural resources of the Rivanna River...

357

COMMISSION REPORT PUBLIC INTEREST ENERGY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

transmission or distribution of electricity generated from renewable energy resources · Advanced electricity, clean energy, energy infrastructure, electric vehicles, Governor Brown's Clean Energy Jobs Plan The California Energy Commission manages public interest energy research for electric and natural gas research

358

Forestry Commission Sale of Timber  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

shall be exclusive of Value Added Tax, which shall be added to the purchase price of each Lot of satisfactory credit- worthiness. 12. The Forestry Commission's normal terms of payment for credit sales

359

Forestry Commission Sale of Timber  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. All bids shall be exclusive of Value Added Tax, which shall be added to the purchase price of each Lot of satisfactory credit- worthiness. 12. The Forestry Commission's normal terms of payment for credit sales

360

Regulatory Models and the Environment: Practice, Pitfalls, and Prospects  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Computational models support environmental regulatory activities by providing the regulator an ability to evaluate available knowledge, assess alternative regulations, and provide a framework to assess compliance. But all models face inherent uncertainties, because human and natural systems are always more complex and heterogeneous than can be captured in a model. Here we provide a summary discussion of the activities, findings, and recommendations of the National Research Council's Committee on Regulatory Environmental Models, a committee funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency to provide guidance on the use of computational models in the regulatory process. Modeling is a difficult enterprise even outside of the potentially adversarial regulatory environment. The demands grow when the regulatory requirements for accountability, transparency, public accessibility, and technical rigor are added to the challenges. Moreover, models cannot be validated (declared true) but instead should be evaluated with regard to their suitability as tools to address a specific question. The committee concluded that these characteristics make evaluation of a regulatory model more complex than simply comparing measurement data with model results. Evaluation also must balance the need for a model to be accurate with the need for a model to be reproducible, transparent, and useful for the regulatory decision at hand. Meeting these needs requires model evaluation to be applied over the"life cycle" of a regulatory model with an approach that includes different forms of peer review, uncertainty analysis, and extrapolation methods than for non-regulatory models.

Holmes, K. John; Graham, Judith A.; McKone, Thomas; Whipple, Chris

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Annual Energy Outlook 1999 - Legislation & Regulations  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

leg_reg.gif (4810 bytes) leg_reg.gif (4810 bytes) Introduction Because analyses by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) are required to be policy-neutral, the projections in this Annual Energy Outlook 1999 (AEO99) are based on Federal, State, and local laws and regulations in effect on July 1, 1998. The potential impacts of pending or proposed legislation and sections of existing legislation for which funds have not been appropriated are not reflected in the projections. Federal legislation incorporated in the projections includes the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, which adds 4.3 cents per gallon to the Federal tax on highway fuels [1]; the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987; the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA90); the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT); the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act of 1995; and the Tax Payer Relief Act of 1997. AEO99 also incorporates regulatory actions of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), including Orders 888 and 889, which provide open access to interstate transmission lines in electricity markets, and other FERC actions to foster more efficient natural gas markets. State plans for the restructuring of the electricity industry and State renewable portfolio standards are incorporated as enacted.

362

Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regulatory Processes to Regulatory Processes to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on AddThis.com... About History & Impacts Statutory Authorities & Rules Regulatory Processes Plans & Schedules Reports & Publications Standards & Test Procedures Implementation, Certification & Enforcement Rulemakings & Notices Further Guidance ENERGY STAR® Popular Links Success Stories

363

Regulatory and technical reports (abstract index journal). Volume 20, No. 2: Compilation for second quarter April--June 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This compilation consists of bibliographic data and abstracts for the formal regulatory and technical reports issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff and its contractors. It is NRC`s intention to publish this compilation quarterly and to cumulate it annually.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed.  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is again asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 5-29-12.pdf More Documents & Publications Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798

365

Final Regulatory Impact Review/ Final Environmental Assessment/Initial Regulatory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Final Regulatory Impact Review/ Final Environmental Assessment/Initial Regulatory Flexibility................................................................................................. 1 2 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW................................................................. 2 2 Analysis Amendment 97 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

366

Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis analyzes alternatives to include three species For Amendment 100 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

367

Wyoming State Regulations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Wyoming Wyoming State Regulations: Wyoming State of Wyoming The Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (WOGCC) is the state agency authorized to regulate oil and gas exploration and production waste. The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) administers general environmental protection regulations. Contact Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission 2211 King Blvd. Casper, WY 82602 (street address) P.O. Box 2640 Casper, WY 82602 (mailing address) (307) 234-7147 (phone) (307) 234-5306 (fax) Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality 122 West 25th Street, Herscheler Building Cheyenne, WY 82002 (307) 777-7937 (phone) (307) 777-7682 (fax) Disposal Practices and Applicable Regulations Document # 4855, Agency (Oil and Gas Conservation Commission), General Agency, Board or Commission Rules, Chapter 4 (Environmental Rules, Including Underground Injection Control Program Rules for Enhanced Recovery and Disposal Projects), Section 1. Pollution and Surface Damage (Forms 14A and 14B) of the Wyoming Rules and Regulations contains the environmental rules administered by the WOGCC with respect to management options for exploration and production waste.

368

California Commissioning Collaborative: 2007 Program Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Commissioning Collaborative: 2007 Program Plan Presented by: Jim Parks, Chair CCC Board of Directors November 1, 2007 California Commissioning Collaborative California Commissioning Collaborative Mission and Organization Improve... and RCx as a strategy for meeting efficiency goals CCC projects provide support and resources California Commissioning Collaborative 2007 Program Plan Support for Retrocommissioning Programs Verification of Savings Retrocommissioning Market...

Parks, J.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

California Energy Commission DRAFT STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission DRAFT STAFF REPORT ACHIEVING ENERGY SAVINGS IN CALIFORNIA BUILDINGS CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown, Governor #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Betty Chrisman of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily represent the views

370

Phenylpropanoid related regulatory protein-regulatory region associations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Materials and methods for identifying lignin regulatory region-regulatory protein associations are disclosed. Materials and methods for modulating lignin accumulation are also disclosed.

Apuya, Nestor (Culver City, CA); Bobzin, Steven Craig (Malibu, CA); Park, Joon-Hyun (Oak Park, CA); Doukhanina, Elena (Newbury Park, CA)

2012-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

371

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ............................................................................................................................1 2 Regulatory Impact Review FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

372

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ..............................................................................................................................................1 2 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

373

What's Up with the California Commissioning Collaborative?  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

What's Up with the California Commissioning Collaborative? What's Up with the California Commissioning Collaborative? Speaker(s): Kristin Heinemeier Date: July 8, 2005 - 12:00pm Location: Bldg. 90 The California Commissioning Collaborative's objectives are: --to improve building performance by developing and promoting viable building commissioning practices in California; --to facilitate the development of cost effective programs, tools, techniques and service delivery infrastructure to enable the implementation of building commissioning processes; --to educate and inform concerning building commissioning processes; and --to identify opportunities, establish priorities and promote solutions relating to building commissioning processes in California. Find out about who the CCC is, and their latest activities,

374

Gaseous diffusion plant transition from DOE to external regulation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

After many years of operation as government-owned/contractor-operated facilities, large portions of the gaseous diffusion plants (GDPs) at Portsmouth, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky, were leased to the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC). These facilities are now certified by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and subject to oversight by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The transition from DOE to NRC regulation was more difficult than expected. The original commitment was to achieve NRC certification in October 1995; however, considerably more time was required and transition-related costs escalated. The Oak Ridge Operations Office originally estimated the cost of transition at $60 million; $240 million has been spent to date. The DOE`s experience in transitioning the GDPs to USEC operation with NRC oversight provides valuable lessons (both positive and negative) that could be applied to future transitions.

Dann, R.K.; Crites, T.R.; Rahm-Crites, L.K. [Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States)

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

Buildings, Commissioning, Efficiency, Comfort, and CO2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Continuous commissioning and CC are registered trademarks of the Texas Engineering Experiment Station Commissioning of Existing Buildings Major International Activities ? IEA Annex 40 ?Commissioning of Buildings and HVAC Systems for Improved Energy... Performance? IEA Annex 47 ?Cost Effective Commissioning for Existing and Low Energy Buildings? Commissioning of Existing Buildings International Examples ? China ? to be added? Belgium ? to be added? Japan ? Akashi et al. Source: Mills et al. 2005 Source...

Claridge, D. E.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Emergency Petition and Complaint of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AND AND FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service ) Commission ) EMERGENCY PETITION AND COMPLAINT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Pursuant to Sections 202(c), 207 and 309 of the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), 16 U.S.C. §§ 824a(c), 824f and 825h, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DCPSC") hereby submits this Emergency Petition and Complaint to avert the impending shutdown of the Potomac River Generating Station power plant ("Potomac River Plant" or "Plant") owned and operated by Mirant Corporation and its public utility subsidiaries (collectively, "Mirant") in Alexandria, Virginia.

377

Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 15. 2011 April 15. 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Via Email: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Subject: Reducing Regulatory Burden, Request for Information, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 23, February 3, 2011 Dear Mr. Cohen: The American Gas Association (AGA) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the subject Department of Energy ("the Department") Request for Information (RFI) seeking comment and information to assist it in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether such regulations should be modified or repealed pursuant to Executive Order 13563 ("Improving

378

Quality Managment Program (QMP) report: A review of quality management programs developed in response to Title 10, Section 35.32 of the Code of Federal Regulations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In July of 1991, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission published a Final Rule in the Federal Register amending regulations governing medical therapeutic administrations of byproduct material and certain uses of radioactive sodium iodide. These amendments required implementation of a Quality Management Program (QMP) to provide high confidence that the byproduct material -- or radiation from byproduct material -- will be administered as directed by an authorized user physician. Herein, this rule is referred to as the QM rule. The Final Rule was published after two proposed rules had been published in the Federal Register.

Witte, M.C.

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

European Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Commission Commission Name European Commission Place Brussels, Belgium Website http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.h Coordinates 50.8503396°, 4.3517103° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":50.8503396,"lon":4.3517103,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

380

New Forestry Commission District Office The new Forestry Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

on sustainable design principles, ensuring a reduced carbon footprint in both the construction beams made from Douglas fir harvested from the Forestry Commission's own forests. The building design in Inverness demonstrates an exemplary approach to using sustainable principles and local timber

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Request to the Energy Commission for Designation as Approved Trade Association Directory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) publishes a paper or electronic directory; (C) is designated, under Sections 1602(a) and 1603(b) of Title 20 ENERGY COMMISSION APPLIANCE PROGRAM ­ SECTION 1606(h), TITLE 20, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (1 in Section 1606(h) of Title 20 of the California Code of Regulations; and (B) the published directory

382

Regulation of Quality and the Ratchet Effect: Does Unverifiability Hurt the Regulator?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The paper considers a regulatory relationship in which the quality of the output produced by the firm may be hard to verify. When the regulators commitment power is unlimited, one finds that unverifiability alwa...

Dag Morten Dalen

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

REGULATORY STATUS: AOC  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

184 UNIT NAME: Concrete Rubble pile 129) REGULATORY STATUS: AOC LOCATION: Outside plant security south of C-611 Water Treatment Plant. Estimated to be less than 5 cubic feet....

384

What Is the Plan Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

What Is the Plan Commission & How Does It Work? Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service valuable to the community and to its elected and appointed officials. Plans and proposals from individuals- nance, and a subdivision ordinance. They also make recommendations to elected officials on proposed

385

University of Birmingham Policy Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Public service reform is an obvious focus for the first University of Birmingham Policy Commission is an important attempt to bring together evidence of past attempts at reform with new research and thinking the voices of young people in its work. So often, policy reformers and thinkers ignore this untapped resource

Birmingham, University of

386

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, improve air quality, and stimulate the sustainable production and use of biofuels within California submitted under the Biomethane Production grant solicitation and proposed for funding under the Alternative Solicitation PON09003 for Biomethane Production MAY 2010 CEC6002010004 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

387

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Many thanks are due to the following individuals for their contributions and technical support Supply and Demand Outlook provides a summary of the California Energy Commission staff assessment of electricity system or grid capability to provide power to meet peak electricity demand within California

388

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: ALTHERMA AIR-TO-WATER SOURCE HEAT PUMP FOR THE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS MARCH 2012 CEC Commission's approval of a compliance option for the Altherma AirtoWater Source Heat Pump system the equipment efficiency ratings necessary to calculate performance of the Altherma AirtoWater Source Heat Pump

389

Best Practices in Existing Building Commissioning  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OCTOBER 20-21, 2010 OCTOBER 20-21, 2010 RAPID CITY, SD Best Practices in Existing Building Commissioning Carl E. Lundstrom, P. E., CCP Federal Solutions Manager E M C Engineers, Inc. - Subsidiary of Eaton Corporation * The Purpose & Benefits of Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx) * The Building Commissioning Association (BCA) & "Best Practices" * Contracting & Hiring Qualified Providers * Typical Measures & Ideal Facilities * Success Factors Presentation Agenda What is The Building Commissioning Association? Integrity Leadership Quality Expertise  International non-profit organization (founded in 1998)  Recognized commissioning authority and resource  Commissioning providers, building owners, energy companies, facility managers, architects, engineers, and contractors

390

Knowledge Management Initiatives Used to Maintain Regulatory Expertise in Transportation and Storage of Radioactive Materials - 12177  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was established in 1974 with the mission to license and regulate the civilian use of nuclear materials for commercial, industrial, academic, and medical uses in order to protect public health and safety, and the environment, and promote the common defense and security. Currently, approximately half (?49%) of the workforce at the NRC has been with the Agency for less than six years. As part of the Agency's mission, the NRC has partial responsibility for the oversight of the transportation and storage of radioactive materials. The NRC has experienced a significant level of expertise leaving the Agency due to staff attrition. Factors that contribute to this attrition include retirement of the experienced nuclear workforce and mobility of staff within or outside the Agency. Several knowledge management (KM) initiatives have been implemented within the Agency, with one of them including the formation of a Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation (SFST) KM team. The team, which was formed in the fall of 2008, facilitates capturing, transferring, and documenting regulatory knowledge for staff to effectively perform their safety oversight of transportation and storage of radioactive materials, regulated under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 71 and Part 72. In terms of KM, the SFST goal is to share critical information among the staff to reduce the impact from staff's mobility and attrition. KM strategies in place to achieve this goal are: (1) development of communities of practice (CoP) (SFST Qualification Journal and the Packaging and Storing Radioactive Material) in the on-line NRC Knowledge Center (NKC); (2) implementation of a SFST seminar program where the seminars are recorded and placed in the Agency's repository, Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); (3) meeting of technical discipline group programs to share knowledge within specialty areas; (4) development of written guidance to capture 'administrative and technical' knowledge (e.g., office instructions (OIs), generic communications (e.g., bulletins, generic letters, regulatory issue summary), standard review plans (SRPs), interim staff guidance (ISGs)); (5) use of mentoring strategies for experienced staff to train new staff members; (6) use of Microsoft SharePoint portals in capturing, transferring, and documenting knowledge for staff across the Division from Division management and administrative assistants to the project managers, inspectors, and technical reviewers; and (7) development and implementation of a Division KM Plan. A discussion and description of the successes and challenges of implementing these KM strategies at the NRC/SFST will be provided. (authors)

Lindsay, Haile; Garcia-Santos, Norma; Saverot, Pierre; Day, Neil; Gambone Rodriguez, Kimberly; Cruz, Luis; Sotomayor-Rivera, Alexis; Vechioli, Lucieann; Vera, John; Pstrak, David [United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop EBB-03D-02M, 6003 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). I have reviewed the Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). In the Department of Energy"s (DOE) attempt to meet its obligation to implement Executive Order 13563, ""Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,"" issued by the President on January 18, 2011, I recommend DOE make a bold move to change

392

Category:Regulatory Roadmap Properties | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Regulatory Roadmap Properties Regulatory Roadmap Properties Jump to: navigation, search Properties used in the Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap. Pages in category "Regulatory Roadmap Properties" The following 15 pages are in this category, out of 15 total. E Property:EstimatedTime Property:EstimatedTimeExplained G Property:GRR/ActionableEntity Property:GRR/ActionableEntityType Property:GRR/BestPractices G cont. Property:GRR/ContactAgency Property:GRR/Elements Property:GRR/ElementType Property:GRR/ParentElement Property:GRR/PotentialRoadblocks G cont. Property:GRR/Regulation Property:GRR/SectionCode Property:GRR/SectionNumber Property:GRR/SubsectionElementNumber R Property:Reference Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Regulatory_Roadmap_Properties&oldid=419537

393

Charities and Political Campaigning: The Impact of Risk-Based Regulation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This article examines the effects of the Charity Commissions implementation of risk-based regulation on the political campaigning activities of charities. In doing so ... with a brief exploration of the emergenc...

Karen Atkinson

2008-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

On Line Beamline Commissioning Activity Approval Form  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Commissioning Activity Approval Form Commissioning Activity Approval Form This form is to be filled by the Commissioning Activity Team Leader. No beamline commissioning activities will be allowed to run without a properly completed, approved, and posting of this commissioning approval form. You will be notified by e-mail upon approval. Sector Beamline Expected Start Date Expected Duration 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 BM ID ( Give a Unit) Activity Description( Give only a brief description) Commissioning Team Members First and Last Name Affiliation Phone Number 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Special Safety Concerns Commissioning Activity Team Leader Name E-Mail Address Submit Commissioning Activity Approval Form Clear all Fields and start All over again!!!

395

Blue Ribbon Commission Tour of Hanford Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future toured the Department of Energy's Hanford Site on July 14, 2010. Commission members, invited guests, and members of the public visited facilities that store high-level, radioactive waste.

Paul Saueressig

2010-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

396

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES FIFTH EDITION CALIFORNIA ENERGY;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Robert Weisenmiller Chairman James D. Boyd Vice Chair Commissioners: Karen Brook, Municipal and Commercial Building Targeted Measure Program Larry Rillera, Clean Energy Business

397

Flathead Basin Commission Act of 1983 (Montana)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Act establishes the Flathead Basin Commission, the purpose of which is to protect the Flathead Lake aquatic environment, its waters, and surrounding lands and natural resources. The Commission...

398

November 4, 2014 LAB COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission) wasconvened for its fourth meeting at 9:00 AM on November 4, 2014. The meeting included three panels...

399

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1516 Ninth Street  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1516 Ninth Street Sacramento, California 95814 Main website: www acceptance testing for lighting controls and mechanical systems, and their employers. Concurrent COMMISSION 1516 Ninth Street 1st Floor, Hearing Room A Sacramento, California Wheelchair Accessible Remote

400

Blue Ribbon Commission Tour of Hanford Site  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

The Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future toured the Department of Energy's Hanford Site on July 14, 2010. Commission members, invited guests, and members of the public visited facilities that store high-level, radioactive waste.

Paul Saueressig

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Integrated Commissioning for a Large Medical Facility  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, inpatient areas, critical areas, diagnostic areas, and pharmacy and a research center. An integrated commissioning of the HVAC system was performed for this building. The commissioning activities improved the building comfort conditions and reduced...

Zhu, Y.; Batten, T.; Turner, W. D.; Claridge, D. E.; Giebler, T.; Liu, M.; Zhou, J.; Cameron, C.; Keeble, B.; Hirchak, R.

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

Radiation dose assessment methodology and preliminary dose estimates to support US Department of Energy radiation control criteria for regulated treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes and materials  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides unit dose to concentration levels that may be used to develop control criteria for radionuclide activity in hazardous waste; if implemented, these criteria would be developed to provide an adequate level of public and worker health protection, for wastes regulated under U.S, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements (as derived from the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act [RCRA] and/or the Toxic Substances Control Act [TSCA]). Thus, DOE and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission can fulfill their obligation to protect the public from radiation by ensuring that such wastes are appropriately managed, while simultaneously reducing the current level of dual regulation. In terms of health protection, dual regulation of very small quantities of radionuclides provides no benefit.

Aaberg, R.L.; Baker, D.A.; Rhoads, K.; Jarvis, M.F.; Kennedy, W.E. Jr.

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

403

Regulatory and Wetlands Policy (Minnesota) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regulatory and Wetlands Policy (Minnesota) Regulatory and Wetlands Policy (Minnesota) Regulatory and Wetlands Policy (Minnesota) < Back Eligibility Utility Fed. Government Commercial Agricultural Investor-Owned Utility State/Provincial Govt Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Residential Installer/Contractor Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Low-Income Residential Schools Retail Supplier Institutional Multi-Family Residential Systems Integrator Fuel Distributor Nonprofit General Public/Consumer Transportation Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Minnesota Program Type Environmental Regulations These statutes establish wetlands as a natural resource of public value in

404

The waste isolation pilot plant regulatory compliance program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The passage of the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act of 1992 (LWA) marked a turning point for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) program. It established a Congressional mandate to open the WIPP in as short a time as possible, thereby initiating the process of addressing this nation`s transuranic (TRU) waste problem. The DOE responded to the LWA by shifting the priority at the WIPP from scientific investigations to regulatory compliance and the completion of prerequisites for the initiation of operations. Regulatory compliance activities have taken four main focuses: (1) preparing regulatory submittals; (2) aggressive schedules; (3) regulator interface; and (4) public interactions

Mewhinney, J.A. [U.S. Dept. of Energy, Carlsbad, NM (United States); Kehrman, R.F. [Westinghouse Electric Corp., Carlsbad, NM (United States)

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

PP-13 Federal Power Commission | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 Federal Power Commission PP-13 Federal Power Commission Presidential permit authorizing Federal Power Commission to construct, operate, and maintain electric transmission...

406

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Contacts Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on

407

ENERGY STAR Guide to Retro-Commissioning  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

ENERGY STAR Guide to Retro-Commissioning gives an overview of RCx and provides detailed project guidance.

408

Fourth RFI_Comment on Regulatory Review.pdf  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

47328 47328 Vol. 77, No. 153 Wednesday, August 8, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The purpose of DOE's review is to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its

409

DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is now interested in receiving comment on the suggestions and comments received from outside parties. Those comments and suggestions are posted on the Office of the General Counsel website: Retrospective Review of Regulations. On January 31, 2011, the Department took two steps to launch its

410

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES DRAFT SIXTH FIFTH EDITION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION ON FEBRUARY 158, 20112012 CEC-150-2009-004-CMF-REV4REV5 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12;2 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Robert Weisenmiller Chairman James

411

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES SECOND EDITION ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FEBRUARY 10, 2010 CEC-150-2009-004-CMF-REV1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas Chairman James D. Boyd Vice Chair

412

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES PROPOSED THIRD EDITION SECOND EDITION PROPOSED TO ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION AUGUST 6, FEBRUARY 10, 2010 CEC-150-2009-004-CMF-REV21 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12;2 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas

413

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES FOURTH EDITION ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 CEC-150-2009-004-CMF-REV3 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas Chairman James D. Boyd Vice Chair

414

The California Energy Commission and Its Programs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) provide market support to existing, new and emerging renewable technologies. With energy challenges facingThe California Energy Commission and Its Programs A Public Information Guide Prepared by the Public Adviser's Office of the California Energy Commission #12;Background The California Energy Commission

415

Danish Atomic Energy Commission Research Establishment Riso  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

10 Ol CM l-l I S l ^. n ·H Danish Atomic Energy Commission Research Establishment Riso Chemistry Atomic Energy Commission Z. Fordos, Concrete Research Laboratory Karlstrup M. Skytte, Betonvarefabriken. E. Bjergbakke, Accelerator Dept. Danish Atomic Energy Commission Z. FSrdos, Concrete Research

416

so Ris Report * Danish Atomic Energy Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

so Risø Report r- 6 §* Danish Atomic Energy Commission 2 Research Establishment Risø Incorporation Commission Research Establishment Risø by lb Larsen Danish Atomic Energy Commission Research Establishment in Bitumen of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Water Evaporator Concentrate at the Danish Atomic Energy Com

417

Workshop on environmental assessment. [Regulation of applications of nuclear energy and related ancillary systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Objectives of the workshop were: to review and evaluate the state-of-the-art of environmental impact assessments as applied to the regulation of applications of nuclear energy and related ancillary systems; to identify areas where existing technology allows establishing acceptable methods or standard practices that will meet the requirements of the NRC regulations, standards and guides for both normal operations and off-standard conditions including accident considerations; to illuminate topics where existing models or analytical methods are deficient because of unverified assumptions, a paucity of empirical data, conflicting results reported in the literature or a need for observation of operation systems; to compile, analyze and synthesize a prioritized set of research needs to advance the state-of-the-art to the level which will meet all of the requirements of the Commission's regulations, standards and guides; and to develop bases for maintaining the core of regulatory guidance at the optimum level balancing technical capabilities with practical considerations of cost and value to the regulatory process. The discussion held in small group sessions on aquatic, atmospheric, and terrestrial pathways are presented. The following research needs were identified as common to all three groups: validation of models; characterization of source terms; development of screening techniques; basis for de minimis levels of contamination; and updating of objectives for environmental monitoring programs.

Watson, E.C. (comp.)

1982-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

BC2 Chicane BPM Commissioning  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BC2 Chicane BPM Commissioning 01-12-09 Goals: e-5 4e-5 to 9e-5 7e-5 2e-4 2e-4 + 1e-2 Energy resolution 80 mm25 mBC2 BPM 1.3 GHz front-end 1 mm2 mBC2 BPM optical front-end 2 mm15 m to 30 mPhotomultiplier Tube Monitor 10 cm70 mOut-of-loop Vector Sum

419

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Regulation and Disease Regulation of IDPs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

31st Jan 2011 Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Regulation and Disease Regulation of IDPs M. Madan ......................................................................................................................................8 #12;1 Abstract Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are often enriched in signaling and regulatory functions because the features of disordered segments permit interaction with multiple proteins

Babu, M. Madan

420

February 2008 In 2003, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Energy Commission, and the California  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;February 2008 In 2003, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Energy, the Energy Commission and the Public Utilities Commission adopted a second plan, Energy Action Plan II a comprehensive set of recommended actions to achieve these policies. The Public Utilities Commission has a number

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Political expediency vrs [sic] policy directive: a case study of telecommunications in Jamaica and the move towards an integrated regulator.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??This paper considers regulatory reform in Jamaica's telecommunication industry. "Currently, Jamaican telecommunication operates under a multi-sector regulator, the Office of Utility Regulation (OUR), which has (more)

[No author

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

Commission.  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Len Myers Special Requests (301) 903-2180 Len.Myers@nnsa.doe.gov Patricia Smith NRC Reconciliation (301) 903-6860 PatriciaR.Smith@nnsa.doe.gov Homepage: http:...

423

Beyond Commissioning: The Role of Automation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This article takes a brief look at the benefits of commissioning and describes a vision of the future where most of the objectives of commissioning will be accomplished automatically by capabilities built into the building systems themselves. Commissioning will become an activity that's performed continuously rather than periodically, and only repairs requiring replacement or overhaul of equipment will require manual intervention. The article then identifies some of the technologies that will be needed to realize this vision and ends with a call for all involved in the enterprise of building commissioning and automation to embrace and dedicate themselves to a future of automated commissioning.

Brambley, Michael R.; Katipamula, Srinivas

2005-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

424

National Energy Commission (China) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

China) China) Jump to: navigation, search Name National Energy Commission (China) Place Beijing References National Energy Commission (China)[1] No information has been entered for this organization. Add Organization This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. National Energy Commission (China) is a new, high level, 21 member interagency commission based in Beijing, China, and is responsible for China's new energy law (expected 1/1/2011). [2] National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Environmental Protection (China) See also Government_policy_and_investment_in_clean_energy_(China) Key Facts Members Li Junfeng, National Development and Reform Commission ____, People's Liberation Army References ↑ "National Energy Commission (China)"

425

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW: ECONOMIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE ALTERNATIVES FOR AMENDMENT 47 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE GROUNDFISH FISHERY OF THE BERING SEA AND ALEUTIAN

426

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS to the Fisheries Management Plan (FMP) for the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) area, approved on March 4. The structure of the FMP allows certain measures to be changed by regulatory amendments without amending the FMP

427

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/INITIAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/INITIAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS OF A REGULATORY AMENDMENT TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR GROUNDFISH OF THE GULF OF ALASKA and the GROUNDFISH Islands Area (BSAI) are managed under the Fishery Management Plans for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska

428

Regulatory independence and accountability: a survey of international nuclear regulatory regimes  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

As the government of India considers development of an independent regulator for civil nuclear power, examples from other nations around the world, including those with established civil nuclear programmes and those now developing new nuclear, provide interesting insights and lessons to be learned. This paper compares the organisational structure of the Indian governmental agency, the Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority, proposed in Bill No. 76 of 2011, with the organisational structures of independent national regulators of civil nuclear power programmes from the USA, the UK, Japan, the People's Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates. The paper discusses where in the government the agency is housed, sources of authority, sources of funding, regulatory powers and functional independence, both from the government agency charged with developing civil nuclear power and from nuclear facility operators.

Timothy P. Matthews; Esther K. Park

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Development Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name: Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission Abbreviation: LCDC Place: Portland, Oregon Website: http:...

430

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric Utilities. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric Utilities. Under Title I of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is required to publish a list identifying each electric utility that Title I applies to. [See PURPA SEC. 102(c).] The following list is being released by DOE in August 2006 for review and comment by state public utility commissions. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric

431

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) -List of Covered Electric Utilities - 2006 Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) -List of Covered Electric Utilities - 2006 Under Title I of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is required to publish a list identifying each electric utility that Title I applies to. [See PURPA SEC. 102(c).] The following list is being released by DOE in August 2006 for review and comment by state public utility commissions. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric

432

Creating a Comprehensive, Efficient, and Sustainable Nuclear Regulatory Structure  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Abstract. With the congressionally mandated January 1, 2013 deadline for the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Nuclear Material Protection, Control and Accounting (MPC&A) program to complete its transition of MPC&A responsibility to the Russian Federation, NNSA management directed its MPC&A program managers and team leaders to demonstrate that work in ongoing programs would lead to successful and timely achievement of these milestones. In the spirit of planning for successful project completion, the NNSA review of the Russian regulatory development process confirmed the critical importance of an effective regulatory system to a sustainable nuclear protection regime and called for an analysis of the existing Russian regulatory structure and the identification of a plan to ensure a complete MPC&A regulatory foundation. This paper describes the systematic process used by the U.S. DOE MPC&A Regulatory Development Project RDP) to develop an effective and sustainable MPC&A regulatory structure in the Russian Federation. This nuclear regulatory system will address all non-military Category I and II nuclear materials at State Corporation for Atomic Energy Rosatom, the Federal Service for Ecological, Technological, and Nuclear Oversight (Rostechnadzor), the Federal Agency for Marine and River Transport (FAMRT, within the Ministry of Transportation), and the Ministry of Industry and Trade (Minpromtorg). The approach to ensuring a complete and comprehensive nuclear regulatory structure includes five sequential steps. The approach was adopted from DOEs project management guidelines and was adapted to the regulatory development task by the RDP. The five steps in the Regulatory Development Process are: 1) Define MPC&A Structural Elements; 2) Analyze the existing regulatory documents using the identified Structural Elements; 3) Validate the analysis with Russian colleagues and define the list of documents to be developed; 4) Prioritize and schedule the development of documents; 5) Identify and develop processes to measure effectiveness of regulations. Utilizing this process is resulting in an effective regulatory process that is understood and is being adopted by the four RF organizations. It is anticipated that the current regulatory development process will continue after U.S. support ends. Utilization of the systematic methodology will ensure regulatory development is based on required MPC&A structural elements and will support the continued maintenance and development of an effective regulatory base.

O'Brien, Patricia; Wright, Troy L.; Tuttle, John D.; Hazel, Michael J.; Schlegel, Steven C.; Miller, Daniel R.

2009-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

433

Reverse Engineering and Analysis of Genome-Wide Gene Regulatory Networks from Gene Expression Profiles Using High-Performance Computing  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Regulation of gene expression is a carefully regulated phenomenon in the cell. "Reverse-engineering algorithms try to reconstruct the regulatory interactions among genes from genome-scale measurements of gene expression profiles (microarrays). ... Keywords: Reverse engineering, gene regulatory network, clustering algorithm, parallel computing.

Vincenzo Belcastro; Francesco Gregoretti; Velia Siciliano; Michele Santoro; Giovanni D'Angelo; Gennaro Oliva; Diego di Bernardo

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

ENERGY COMMISSION APPL.lCATION FOR SOURCE MATERIAL LICENSE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

COMMISSION COMMISSION APPL.lCATION FOR SOURCE MATERIAL LICENSE Pursuant to the rcgu!ations in Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Part 40, application is hereby made for a license to receive, possess, use, transfer, deliver or import into the United Stat-, source material for the activity or activities described. 1. (check ooa) 2. NAME OF APPLICANT W. R. GRACE 6 Co. 0 (a) New Iicense 0 (b) Amendment to License No.- Davison Chemical Division STA-422 3. Q (c) Renewal of Licensr No. 0 (d) Previous License No. Pompton Plains, N. J. 4. ST,.TE THE AOORESS(ES) AT WHICH SOURCE MATERIAL WILL BE POSSESSED OR USED 868 Black Oak Ridge Road, Wayne, fi. J. a*ocY s up/'l File IF 5. BUSINESS OR OCCUPATION I 6. (a) IF APPLICANT IS AN INDIVIDUAL. STATE CITIZENSHIP

435

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 |  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI). In the RFI, the Department of Energy (DOE) is asking for comments on ways to streamline its regulations and to eliminate unnecessary ones, so as to make the regulations less burdensome and more effective. Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 9-7-12.pdf More Documents & Publications Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011)

436

Library Regulations Library Regulations  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Library Regulations 2012-13 Library Regulations UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM REGULATIONS LIBRARY REGULATIONS Preamble: The Library Regulations apply to all users of library facilities managed on behalf of the University by Library Services, and thus there are sections that apply also to non- members of the University

Birmingham, University of

437

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS Juneau, AK 99802 (907) 586-7228 Abstract: This Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review For Amendment 89 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management

438

Commissioning through "EDF Tower" construction  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

michel rouillot -architecte d.p.l.g. CommissioningCommissioningthrough through ??EDF TowerEDF Tower? construction? construction by Michel Rouillot Architect D.P.L.G. michel rouillot -architecte d.p.l.g. What is a building project ? michel rouillot... -architecte d.p.l.g. A spatial answerfor a work structure michel rouillot -architecte d.p.l.g. A very strong relationship between many building participants michel rouillot -architecte d.p.l.g. The production of the buildingThe production of the building...

Rouillot, M.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Results from two workshops: Developing and amending regulations and funding state radiation control programs  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The first section of this document presents the results of a technical workshop on the process of regulations development and amendment sponsored by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This workshop focused on methods for reducing the time it takes to promulgate regulations to help those States that are having difficulty meeting the three-year deadline for adopting new NRC regulations. Workshop participants responded to six questions, reviewed the procedures used by various States for revising and adopting changes to their regulations, and reviewed the time-flow charts used by various States. This workshop was designed to provide guidance to States that are promulgating and revising regulations. The second section of this document summarizes the proceedings of a technical workshop, also sponsored by the NRC, on funding radiation control programs that emphasized fee schedules and effective strategies for the 1990s. This workshop focused on determining the true costs of running a program, on setting realistic fees for the various categories of licenses, and on the most efficient methods for sending invoices, recording receipts, depositing money received, and issuing licenses. Workshop participants responded to seven questions; reviewed the methods various States use to determine true costs; reviewed the procedure that the various States use to produce invoices and licenses; reviewed the procedures that the States are required to abide by when they receive money; and reviewed the method used by the NRC to determine the cost of its various programs.

Parker, G.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

CANDU reactors, their regulation in Canada, and the identification of relevant NRC safety issues  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Atomic Energy of Canada, Limited (AECL) and its subsidiary in the US, are considering submitting the CANDU 3 design for standard design certification under 10 CFR Part 52. CANDU reactors are pressurized heavy water power reactors. They have some substantially different safety responses and safety systems than the LWRs that the commercial power reactor licensing regulations of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) have been developed to deal with. In this report, the authors discuss the basic design characteristics of CANDU reactors, specifically of the CANDU 3 where possible, and some safety-related consequences of these characteristics. The authors also discuss the Canadian regulatory provisions, and the CANDU safety systems that have evolved to satisfy the Canadian regulatory requirements as of December 1992. Finally, the authors identify NRC regulations, mainly in 10 CFR Parts 50 and 100, with issues for CANDU 3 reactor designs. In all, eleven such regulatory issues are identified. They are: (1) the ATWS rule ({section}50.62); (2) station blackout ({section}50.63); (3) conformance with Standard Review Plan (SRP); (4) appropriateness of the source term ({section}50.34(f) and {section}100.11); (5) applicability of reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) requirements ({section}50.55a, etc); (6) ECCS acceptance criteria ({section}50.46)(b); (7) combustible gas control ({section}50.44, etc); (8) power coefficient of reactivity (GDC 11); (9) seismic design (Part 100); (10) environmental impacts of the fuel cycle ({section}51.51); and (11) (standards {section}50.55a).

Charak, I.; Kier, P.H. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

EIA - Smart Grid Legislative and Regulatory Policies and Case Studies  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Full report (4.0 mb) Full report (4.0 mb) Attachment A - U.S. State legislative and regulatory policies (2.0 mb) Attachment B - U.S. smart grid case studies (1.6 mb) Attachment C - International smart grid activities (0.6 mb) Maps below summarize smart grid legislation & regulation: U.S. smart meter penetration by State, 2010. Advanced metering legislation & regulation. Advanced metering legislation & regulation. Smart Grid Legislative and Regulatory Policies and Case Studies Release date: December 12, 2011 In recent years, a number of U.S. states have adopted or are considering smart grid related laws, regulations, and voluntary or mandatory requirements. At the same time, the number of smart grid pilot projects has been increasing rapidly. Recent activity includes the deployment of smart

442

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS: This Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA For Amendments to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

443

IEP - Water-Energy Interface: Regulatory Drivers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers Several legislative acts are in place that could potentially impact water quality requirements and water use for fossil energy production as well as electricity generation. These acts regulate pollutant discharge and water intake directly and indirectly. Under regulations established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), these Acts serve to maintain and improve the Nation's water resources for uses including but not limited to agricultural, industrial, nutritional, and recreational purposes. The Clean Water Act - The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, more commonly known as the Clean Water Act, provides for the regulation of discharges to the nation's surface waters. To address pollution, the act specifies that the discharge of any pollutant by any person is unlawful except when in compliance with applicable permitting requirements. Initial emphasis was placed on "point source" pollutant discharge, but 1987 amendments authorized measures to address "non-point source" discharges, including stormwater runoff from industrial facilities. Permits are issued under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), which designates the highest level of water pollution or lowest acceptable standards for water discharges. NPDES permits are typically administered by the individual states. With EPA approval, the states may implement standards more stringent than federal water quality standards, but may not be less stringent. Certain sections of the Act are particularly applicable to water issues related to power generation. These include:

444

FPCC Regulatory Barriers Submittal | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Barriers Submittal FPCC Regulatory Barriers Submittal The Federal Performance Contracting Coalition (FPCC) appreciates the opportunity to comment on reducing regulatory...

445

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Generation Projects on Federal Lands Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands Presentation covers regulatory considerations for developing...

446

Variable Renewable Energy: a Regulatory Roadmap (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There is not a one-size-fits-all approach to the regulation of variable renewable energy (VRE), but international experience reveals many approaches that are proving successful. Drawing upon research and experiences from various international contexts, the 21st Century Power Partnership in conjunction with the Clean Energy Solutions Center and Clean Energy Regulators Initiative identified key issues and ideas that have emerged as variable deployment has grown. The Power Partnership research, published in 2014, identified four broad categories of regulatory issues.

Not Available

2014-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Mineral Test Hole Regulatory Act (Tennessee) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mineral Test Hole Regulatory Act (Tennessee) Mineral Test Hole Regulatory Act (Tennessee) Mineral Test Hole Regulatory Act (Tennessee) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Developer Fuel Distributor Industrial Installer/Contractor Investor-Owned Utility Municipal/Public Utility Utility Program Info State Tennessee Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Tennessee Department Of Environment and Conservation The Mineral Hole Regulatory Act is applicable to any person (individual, corporation, company, association, joint venture, partnership, receiver, trustee, guardian, executor, administrator, personal representative or private organization of any kind) who wishes to drill a mineral test hole (any hole in excess of one hundred (100) feet drilled during the exploration for minerals but shall exclude auger drilling in surficial or

448

General Renewable Energy-Policy and Regulatory Studies | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

General Renewable Energy-Policy and Regulatory Studies General Renewable Energy-Policy and Regulatory Studies Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: General Renewable Energy-Policy and Regulatory Studies Agency/Company /Organization: World Bank Sector: Energy Focus Area: Renewable Energy Topics: Implementation, Policies/deployment programs Website: web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTENERGY2/EXTRENENERGYTK/0,, References: General Renewable Energy-Policy and Regulatory Studies[1] Resources Regulator's Handbook on Renewable Energy Programs & Tariffs, The Center for Resource Solutions. Conference Issue Paper, Renewables 2004, International Conference for Renewable Energies Electricity, Renewables and Climate Change: Searching for a Cost-Effective Policy, Karen Palmer and Dallas Burtraw, Resources for the

449

Kansas State Regulations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Kansas Kansas State Regulations: Kansas State of Kansas The Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) Conservation Division regulates oil and gas operations and protects correlative rights and environmental resources. Otherwise, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) administers the major environmental protection laws. Contact Kansas Corporation Commission (Main Office) 1500 S.W. Arrowhead Road Topeka, KS 66604-2425 (785) 271-3100 (phone) (785) 271-3354 (fax) Conservation Division Finney State Office Building 130 South Market, Room 2078 Wichita, KS 67202-3802 (316) 337-6200 (phone) (316) 337-6211 (fax) Kansas Department of Health and Environment Charles Curtis State Office Building 1000 S.W. Jackson Topeka, KS 66612 (785) 296-1500 (phone) (785) 368-6368 (fax)

450

Oklahoma State Regulations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Oklahoma Oklahoma State Regulations: Oklahoma State of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC), through the Oil and Gas Division, assists the domestic oil and gas industry, protects and preserves the environment, and conserves the natural resources. General environmental protection regulations are administered by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Contact Oklahoma Corporation Commission Oil and Gas Division P.O. Box 52000 Oklahoma City, OK 73152-2000 (mailing address) (405) 521-2302 (phone) 2101 North Lincoln Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73105 (street address) Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1677 Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677 (mailing address) 707 North Robinson Oklahoma City, OK 73102 (street address) (405) 702-1000 (phone)

451

CXCR3+ T Regulatory Cells Selectively Accumulate in Human Ovarian Carcinomas to Limit Type I Immunity  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...CD25+ regulatory T cells.J Exp Med 2007;204:735-45. 26. Yamazaki T , Yang XO, Chung Y, Fukunaga A, Nurieva R, Pappu B, et alCCR6 regulates the migration of inflammatory and regulatory T cells.J Immunol 2008;181:8391-401. 27...

Nassima Redjimi; Caroline Raffin; Isabelle Raimbaud; Pascale Pignon; Junko Matsuzaki; Kunle Odunsi; Danila Valmori; and Maha Ayyoub

452

Virginia Electric Utility Regulation Act (Virginia) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Electric Utility Regulation Act (Virginia) Electric Utility Regulation Act (Virginia) Virginia Electric Utility Regulation Act (Virginia) < Back Eligibility Commercial Industrial Investor-Owned Utility Municipal/Public Utility Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Virginia Program Type Safety and Operational Guidelines Provider Virginia State Corporation Commission The Virginia Electric Utility Regulation Act constitutes the main legislation in Virginia that pertains to the regulation of the state's electric utilities. The Act directs the State Corporation Commission to construct regulations for electric utilities, and contains information on

453

Insulation of the ?F Regulatory System in Bacillus subtilis  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...for Microbiology NOTE GENE REGULATION Insulation of the sF Regulatory System in Bacillus...kinases and phosphatases. We report that insulation of the sF pathway from the sB pathway...the sB pathway. We propose that this insulation is achieved both by the action of the...

Karen Carniol; Tae-Jong Kim; Chester W. Price; Richard Losick

2004-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

GeneVis: visualization tools for genetic regulatory network dynamics  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

GeneVis provides a visual environment for exploring the dynamics of genetic regulatory networks. At present time, genetic regulation is the focus of intensive research worldwide, and computational aids are being called for to help in the research of ... Keywords: biological visualization, focus and context, genetic networks, lenses, multirepresentation, visualization

C. A. H Baker; M. S. T Carpendale; P. Prusinkiewicz; M. G. Surette

2002-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

455

Air Quality: Air Pollutants, SLAC Emissions Sources, and Regulatory Reference  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

permit regulations are designed to track, record, and control air pollutants belonging to severalAir Quality: Air Pollutants, SLAC Emissions Sources, and Regulatory Reference Department: Chemical on chemical classifications. This reference outlines major categories of air pollutants found at SLAC

Wechsler, Risa H.

456

Notices ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION Agency Information Collection  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23 Federal Register 23 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Notices ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Election Assistance Commission's Voting System Test Laboratory Program Manual, Version 1.0 AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). ACTION: Notice; comment request. SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on EAC's request to renew an existing information collection, EAC's Voting System Test Laboratory Program Manual, Version

457

Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities (South Carolina) |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities (South Carolina) Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities (South Carolina) Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities (South Carolina) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State South Carolina Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities

458

Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx) Project Considerations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Existing Building Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx) Project Considerations Phil Welker, Executive Director PECI 2 Mapping Out Your Commissioning Strategy Three big questions: 1. Which buildings are commissioning candidates? 2. What commissioning approach(es) should I employ? 3. What expertise do I need to get it done? 3 Which buildings? Many factors come in to play: * Building sizes * Project budgets * Current energy performance * Building control systems * Occupancy rates * Operator/ engineering resources * Long term investment strategy * Sustainability plans or mandates * Equipment Replacements Selecting the right buildings is critical to achieve the maximum benefit in a cost-efficient manner. See the EPA's "A Retrocommissioning Guide for Building Owners"

459

Commission on Energy Efficiency Standards and Practices  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Final Report to the Governor Final Report to the Governor and the Iowa General Assembly Submitted in Compliance with Iowa Code Section 103A.27 January1, 2011 Commission on Energy Efficiency Standards and Practices Commission on Energy Efficiency Standards and Practices 2 Table of Contents Commission Members page 3 Executive Summary page 4 Summary of Recommendations page 5 Legislative Overview page 12 Profile on Iowa's Energy Usage page 14 Commission Proceedings page 15 Recommendations Energy Code Adoption & Compliance page 20 Financing & Incentives page 25 Training and Education page 29 Licensing and Certification page 31 Additional Energy Efficiency Recommendations page 32

460

Best Practices in Existing Building Commissioning  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the Best Practices in Existing Building Commissioning and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Rapid City, South Dakota.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx) Project Considerations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the existing building commissioning (EBCx) project considerations, and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Rapid City, South Dakota.

462

PP-54 Ontario Hydro Electric Power Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presidential Permit authorizing Ontario Hydro Electric Power Commission to construct, operate, and maintain electric transmission facilities at the U.S. - Canada Border.

463

United States Atomic Energy Commission formed  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

formed As the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission failed to come to grips with the growing nuclear weapons problem, the United States worked to establish its own formal...

464

A History of the Atomic Energy Commission  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A History of the Atomic Energy Commission - written by Alice L. BuckWashington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, July 1983.41 pp.

465

The Fenno-Skan HVDC link commissioning  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The commissioning of the Fenno-Skan HVDC link between Finland and Sweden, with the longest submarine dc cable in the world, is described. The main pre-commissioning activities, important for an efficient commissioning, are discussed together with time schedules and suitable organization forms. The procedures to test special control features, such as subsynchronous oscillation (SSO) damping control are presented. The full scale network interaction tests which are an important part of the commissioning are also discussed. These tests succeeded very well and provided a lot of information about the system behavior for future operation and planning purposes.

Nyman, A. (Swedish State Power Board, Vaellingby (Sweden)); Jaeaeskelaeinen, K.; Vaitomaa, M. (Imatran Voima OY, Vantaa (Finland)); Jansson, B.; Danielsson, K.G. (ABB Power Systems, Ludvika (Sweden))

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Example Retro-Commissioning Statement of Work  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

steps. Review Existing Systems & Documentation o Attending meetings through out the process including a retro-commissioning kick-off meeting in preparation for the site...

467

Requirements for Commissioning HVAC Systems Using BEMS and Commissioning the BEMS Itself Based on Questionnaire Surveys  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

In this paper the present status and requirements for commissioning of HVAC Systems using Building Energy Management Systems (BEMS) and commissioning the BEMS itself are investigated and summarized. The information presented is based on the results...

Yoshida, H.; Vaezi-Nejad, H.; Choiniere, D.; Wang, F.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

Regulations For Gas Companies (Tennessee) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Regulations For Gas Companies (Tennessee) Regulations For Gas Companies (Tennessee) Regulations For Gas Companies (Tennessee) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Developer Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Investor-Owned Utility Municipal/Public Utility Utility Program Info State Tennessee Program Type Environmental Regulations Safety and Operational Guidelines Provider Tennessee Regulatory Authority The Regulations for Gas Companies, implemented by the Tennessee Regulatory Authority (Authority) outline the standards for metering, distribution and electricity generation for utilities using gas. They follow the same equipment, metering reporting and customer relations standards as the Regulations for Electric Companies. In addition to these requirements these regulations outline purity requirements, pressure limits, piping

469

Automated Demand Response and Commissioning  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes the results from the second season of research to develop and evaluate the performance of new Automated Demand Response (Auto-DR) hardware and software technology in large facilities. Demand Response (DR) is a set of activities to reduce or shift electricity use to improve the electric grid reliability and manage electricity costs. Fully-Automated Demand Response does not involve human intervention, but is initiated at a home, building, or facility through receipt of an external communications signal. We refer to this as Auto-DR. The evaluation of the control and communications must be properly configured and pass through a set of test stages: Readiness, Approval, Price Client/Price Server Communication, Internet Gateway/Internet Relay Communication, Control of Equipment, and DR Shed Effectiveness. New commissioning tests are needed for such systems to improve connecting demand responsive building systems to the electric grid demand response systems.

Piette, Mary Ann; Watson, David S.; Motegi, Naoya; Bourassa, Norman

2005-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

Essays in Regulatory Economics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

it is highly regulated by PEMEX, the national oil company.market, all gas stations are franchises of PEMEX, they haveto display PEMEX logos and cannot freely set their prices. 3

Guerrero, Santiago

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

Nuclear regulatory legislation, 104th Congress. Volume 2, No. 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the second of two volumes compiling statutes and material pertaining to nuclear regulatory legislation through the 104th Congress, 2nd Session. It is intended for use as a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) internal resource document. Legislative information reproduced in this document includes portions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, various acts pertaining to low-level radioactive waste, the Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, the West Valley Demonstration Project Act, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Export Licensing Statutes, and selected treaties, agreements, and executive orders. Other information provided pertains to Commissioner tenure, NRC appropriations, the Chief Financial Officers Act, information technology management reform, and Federal civil penalties.

NONE

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

The regulatory pendulum in transfusion medicine  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Blood banking and the manufacture of blood products have been relatively outside the influence of regulatory authorities. Several developments contributed to a revision of this environment. The transmission of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome by blood products changed the perception of blood product safety and also spawned litigation and governmental inquiries. The blood banking industry has embraced, with varying degrees of enthusiasm, the principles of systematic quality management and good manufacturing practice, which has created a substantial subindustry and has contributed to a disproportionate focus on product quality. Conventional market forces have also gradually penetrated the traditional blood economies. The public and political focus has resulted in regulatory and policy efforts being concentrated on inappropriate areas. Several of the safety efforts can be arguably described as cost-ineffective while diverting attention and resources from more important issues. An improved integration into mainstream public health policy and incorporation of objectively measured risks into regulatory policy would do much to enhance the quality of the transfusion system. This can be achieved if regulators themselves are overseen through a process that ensures performance and accountability against objective and predefined standards. A further beneficial outcome from this approach could be the harmonization of blood safety and policy measures, the need for which is being felt increasingly worldwide.

Albert Farrugia

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

New Mexico State Regulations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

New Mexico New Mexico State Regulations: New Mexico State of New Mexico The Oil Conservation Division (OCD) in the New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department regulates oil and gas and geothermal operations in New Mexico. The OCD has the responsibility to gather oil and gas production data, permit new wells, establish pool rules and oil and gas allowables, issue discharge permits, enforce rules and regulations of the division, monitor underground injection wells and ensure that abandoned wells are properly plugged and the land is responsibly restored. Otherwise, the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) administers the major environmental protection laws. The Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC), which is administratively attached to the NMED, assigns responsibility for administering its regulations to constituent agencies, including the OCD.

474

California Energy Commission GUIDANCE ON WASTE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

California Energy Commission GUIDANCE GUIDANCE ON WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY) obtain waste management plans for each proposed project receiving funding under the Energy Efficiency of waste. The Energy Commission is providing the following guidance to assist recipients of EECBG Program

475

California Energy Commission FINAL STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

RENEWABLE GENERATION NEEDED TO COMPLY WITH POLICY GOALS CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown, and Renewable Energy Office at the California Energy Commission. Angela Tanghetti was the primary technical, Rachel Salazar, Mark Kootstra, and Garry O'Neil of the Renewable Energy Office, who characterized

476

California Energy Commission STAFF UPDATE REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

with California energy policy goals, called the planning renewable net short throughout this document California Energy Commission STAFF UPDATE REPORT NEW RENEWABLE GENERATION NEEDED TO COMPLY WITH POLICY GOALS: UPDATE FOR 2022 PLANNING CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor

477

Chemical Fume Hood Commissioning & Annual Inspection  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in the ANSI/AIHA Z9.5-2012 and ANSI/ASHRAE 110-1995. 2.0 Scope This SOP applies to all ducted chemical fume in ANSI/AIHA Z9.5-2012 and ANSI/ASHRAE 110-1995. · Commission, or arrange commissioning, of new, renovated

Pawlowski, Wojtek

478

Practical Alternative Financing Strategies for Building Commissioning  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Practical Alternative Financing Strategies for Building Commissioning Arun Jhaveri, Regional Manager Federal Energy Management Program U. S. Dept. of Energy/Western Regional Office Seattle, Washington ABSTRACT Owning and operating a...Practical Alternative Financing Strategies for Building Commissioning Arun Jhaveri, Regional Manager Federal Energy Management Program U. S. Dept. of Energy/Western Regional Office Seattle, Washington ABSTRACT Owning and operating a...

Zhaveri, A.

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

Riso Report No. Danish Atomic Energy Commission  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

fM O o 8- OL '·O c/i Riso Report No. Danish Atomic Energy Commission Research Establishment Riso/t on exchangefrom: Library, Danish Atomic Energy Commission, Risd, Roskilde, Denmark #12;May, 1966 Ris6 Report No Jagiellonski Institute of Physics Krakow, Poland and P. A. Lindgård Mogensen The Danish Atomic Energy

480

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION STAFF COOLING WATER MANAGEMENT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION STAFF COOLING WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES for Wet and Hybrid Cooling Towers at Power Plants May 17, 2004 A and needs, and may vary from the examples cited here. Staff recommend that such a cooling water management

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission regulates" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS) and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS) and Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC to the Director for Forensic Science Vice-Chair, National Commission on Forensic Science NEAFS Plenary Session Hershey, PA November 5, 2014 #12;NCFS and OSAC: U.S. Efforts to Strengthen Forensic Science · National

482

National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS) and Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC to the Director for Forensic Science Vice-Chair, National Commission on Forensic Science 25th International Symposium on Human Identification Phoenix, AZ October 1, 2014 #12;Forensic Science Realignment · NAS report

483

National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS) and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS) and Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC and Technology NIST Fellow & Special Assistant to the Director for Forensic Science Vice-Chair, National Commission on Forensic Science GenomeID Forum Greenville, NC September 10, 2014 #12;Material Measurement

484

National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

National Commission on Forensic Science (NCFS) and Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC on Forensic Science #12;Forensic Science Realignment · NAS report ­ Feb 2009 · White House Subcommittee on Forensic Science (SoFS) ­ July 2009 to Dec 2012 · DOJ/NIST Partnership ­ NCFS (National Commission

485

A Practical Guide for Commissioning Existing Buildings  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Although this guide focuses on the retrocommissioning process and its advantages, all three types of commissioning--retrocommissioning, commissioning, and recommissioning--play an equally important role in ensuring that buildings perform efficiently and provide comfortable, safe, and productive work environments for owners and occupants. For new construction and retrofit projects, commissioning should be incorporated early, during design, and last throughout the length of the project. For buildings that were never commissioned, the retrocommissioning process can yield a wealth of cost-saving opportunities while enhancing a building's environment. Finally, once a building is commissioned or retrocommissioned, incorporating recommissioning into the organization's O and M program (by periodically reapplying the original diagnostic testing and checklist procedures) helps ensure that cost savings and other benefits gained from the original process persist over time.

Haasl, T.; Sharp, T.

1999-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

NETL: IEP - Coal Utilization By-Products : Regulatory Drivers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers Since 1993, Federal Regulations have treated the four major large-volume CUB's -- fly ash, bottom ash, boiler slag, and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) byproducts -- as solid wastes that do not warrant regulation as hazardous wastes under Subtitle C of RCRA, as long as these CUB’s were not co-managed with other waste materials. On May 22, 2000, EPA published a final Regulatory Determination [PDF-320KB] that retained the hazardous waste exemption for coal utilization by-products. EPA has concluded that fossil fuel combustion wastes do not warrant regulation as hazardous under Subtitle C of RCRA and is retaining the hazardous waste exemption for these wastes. However, the Agency has determined that national non-hazardous waste regulations under RCRA Subtitle D are needed for coal combustion wastes disposed in surface impoundments and landfills and used as minefilling. EPA also concluded beneficial uses of these wastes, other than for minefilling, pose no significant risk and no additional national regulations are needed. This determination affects more than 110 million tons of fossil fuel combustion wastes that are generated each year, virtually all from burning coal.

487

Automated Commissioning for Lower-cost, Widely Deployed Building Commissioning of the Future  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This chapter takes a brief look at the benefits of commissioning and describes a vision of the future where most of the objectives of commissioning will be accomplished automatically by capabilities built into the building systems themselves. Commissioning will become an activity that is performed continuously rather than periodically, and only repairs requiring replacement or overhaul of equipment will require manual intervention. This chapter then identifies some of the technologies that will be needed to realize this vision and ends with a call for all involved in the enterprise of building commissioning and automation to embrace and dedicate themselves to a future of automated commissioning.

Brambley, Michael R.; Katipamula, Srinivas

2011-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

488

Sampling Out: Regulatory Avoidance and the Total Coliform Rule  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The propensity of regulated entities to avoid the detection of violations has been demonstrated in contexts such as safety regulation of U.S. nuclear power plants (1), water quality regulation of U.S. pulp-and-paper plants (2), and new source review standards for power plants under the Clean Air Act (3). ... First, state enforcement agencies may negotiate with systems to establish a routine monthly sampling plan, which can exceed the federal minimum. ... Keohane, N. O.; Mansur, E. T.; Voynov, A. Averting regulatory enforcement: evidence from new source review J. Econ. ...

Lori S. Bennear; Katrina K. Jessoe; Sheila M. Olmstead

2009-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

489

Powerplant productivity improvements and regulatory incentives  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this study was to examine the benefits to be gained from increased powerplant productivity and to validate and demonstrate the use of incentives within the regulatory process to promote the improvement of powerplant productivity. The system-wide costs savings to be gained from given productivity improvement scenarios are estimated in both the short and long term. Numerous reports and studies exist which indicate that productivity improvements at the powerplant level are feasible and cost effective. The efforts of this study widen this focus and relate system-wide productivity improvements with system-wide cost savings. The initial thrust of the regulatory section of this study is to validate the existence of reasonable incentive procedures which would enable regulatory agencies to better motivate electric utilities to improve productivity on both the powerplant and system levels. The voluntary incentive format developed in this study was designed to facilitate the link between profit and efficiency which is typically not clear in most regulated market environments. It is concluded that at the present time, many electric utilities in this country could significantly increase the productivity of their base load units, and the adoption of an incentive program of the general type recommended in this study would add to rate of return regulation the needed financial incentives to enable utilities to make such improvements without losing long-run profit. In light of the upcoming oil import target levels and mandatory cutbacks of oil and gas as boiler fuels for electric utilities, the use of incentive programs to encourage more efficient utilization of coal and nuclear base load capacity will become far more inviting over the next two decades.

Hardy, D; Brown, D

1980-10-27T23:59:59.000Z

490

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review / Initial Regulatory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review / Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Proposed Amendment 42 to the Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands King and Tanner � Public review Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Crab Fisheries October 2012 ii #12;Modification of economic

491

Carbon capture retrofits and the cost of regulatory uncertainty  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Power generation firms confront impending replacement of an aging coal-fired fleet in a business environment characterized by volatile natural gas prices and uncertain carbon regulation. We develop a stochastic dynamic programming model of firm investment decisions that minimizes the expected present value of future power generation costs under uncertain natural gas and carbon prices. We explore the implications of regulatory uncertainty on generation technology choice and the optimal timing of investment, and assess the implications of these choices for regulators. We find that interaction of regulatory uncertainty with irreversible investment always raises the social cost of carbon abatement. Further, the social cost of regulatory uncertainty is strongly dependent on the relative competitiveness of IGCC plants, for which the cost of later carbon capture retrofits is comparatively small, and on the firm's ability to use investments in natural gas generation as a transitional strategy to manage carbon regulation uncertainty. Without highly competitive IGCC or low gas prices, regulatory uncertainty can increase the expected social cost of reducing emissions by 40 to 60%.

Reinelt, P.S.; Keith, D.W. [SUNY College of Fredonia, Fredonia, NY (United States). Dept. of Economics

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

492

Student Trainee (Energy Industry Analyst)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is an independent regulatory agency that regulates and oversees various aspects of the energy markets within the United States. We value independence...

493

Student Trainee (Economist)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is an independent regulatory agency that regulates and oversees various aspects of the energy markets within the United States. We value independence...

494

Student Trainee (Legal Intern)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is an independent regulatory agency that regulates and oversees various aspects of the energy markets within the United States. We value independence...

495

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FOR FISHERY PLAN AMENDMENTS TO PROHIBIT USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE ALTERNATIVES / Aleutian Islands Plan Amendment 33 and Gulf of Alaska Plan Amendment 37 Prepared by Staff of the North

496

Hutchinson Utilities Commission - Residential Energy Efficiency Program |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hutchinson Utilities Commission - Residential Energy Efficiency Hutchinson Utilities Commission - Residential Energy Efficiency Program Hutchinson Utilities Commission - Residential Energy Efficiency Program < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Heating Cooling Appliances & Electronics Heat Pumps Commercial Lighting Lighting Water Heating Maximum Rebate 500 Program Info Expiration Date program offered until expiration of funding State Minnesota Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Natural Gas Furnaces: $150-$250, depending on efficiency Natural Gas Furnace Tune-up: $25 ECM Motor: $75 Natural Gas Boilers: $200 Central Air Conditioners: $250 Central Air Conditioner Tune-up: $25 Tankless Gas Water Heaters: $150 Storage Gas Water Heaters: $50 Air Source Heat Pumps: $75/ton

497

Regulatory guidance on soil cover systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in September 1991, completed revisions to 14 sections of the Standard Review Plan (SRP) for the Review of a License Application for a Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility. The major purposes of the SRP are to ensure the quality and uniformity of the NRC staff`s safety reviews, and to present a well-defined base from which to evaluate the acceptability of information and data provided in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR) portion of the license application. SRP 3.2, entitled, Design Considerations for Normal and Abnormal/Accident Conditions, was one of the sections that was revised by the NRC staff. This revision was completed to provide additional regulatory guidance on the important considerations that need to be addressed for the proper design and construction of soil cover systems that are to be placed over the LLW. The cover system over the waste is acknowledged to be one of the most important engineered barriers for the long-term stable performance of the disposal facility. The guidance in revised SRP 3.2 summarizes the previous efforts and recommendations of the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and a peer review panel on the placement of soil cover systems. NRC published these efforts in NUREG/CR-5432. The discussions in this paper highlight selected recommendations on soil cover issues that the NRC staff considers important for ensuring the safe, long-term performance of the soil cover systems. The development phases to be discussed include: (1) cover design; (2) cover material selection; (3) laboratory and field testing; (4) field placement control and acceptance; and (5) penetrations through the constructed covers.

Kane, J.D. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

498

Virginia State Regulations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Virginia Virginia State Regulations: Virginia State of Virginia The Division of Gas and Oil in the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME) regulates the effects of gas and oil operations both on and below the surface. The Virginia Gas and Oil Board is to foster, encourage, and promote the safe and efficient exploration for and development, production, and utilization of gas and oil resources. Otherwise, three regulatory citizen boards are responsible for adopting Virginia 's environmental regulations. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) staff administers the regulations as approved by the boards. Finally, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 3, through its Water Protection Division, administers Class II underground injection control (UIC) programs in Virginia in direct implementation.

499

Resource Management Services: Water Regulation, Part 600: Applications for Licenses and Preliminary Permits Under the Water Power Act (New York)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

These regulations provide instructions for applications proposing the construction, repair, or operation of hydropower sources. Applications are reviewed by the Water Power and Control Commission.

500

Chapter 9: Commissioning the Building | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

the Building Chapter 9: Commissioning the Building Chapter 9 of the LANL Sustainable Design Guide contains information on commissioning process overview and...