Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Project Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This report provides an evaluation of the Project Plan. The Project Plan is intended to provide the high-level direction that documents the required software activities to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Carl Wharton; Kent Norris

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

2

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Project Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This report provides an evaluation of the Project Plan. The Project Plan is intended to provide the high-level direction that documents the required software activities to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Carl Wharton

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

3

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Project Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This report provides an evaluation of the Project Plan. The Project Plan is intended to provide the high-level direction that documents the required software activities to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Carl Wharton; Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

4

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT POWER EXCHANGE MARKET The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a staff settlement calling-2-001 COMMISSION APPROVES $13.8 MILLION SETTLEMENT WITH RELIANT ENERGY OVER PHYSICAL WITHHOLDING IN CALIFORNIA

Laughlin, Robert B.

5

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT FERC APPROVES SETTLEMENT WITH RELIANT IN CALIFORNIA CASES; PROCEEDS COULD TOTAL $50 MILLION The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a settlement between the Commission's enforcement staff

Laughlin, Robert B.

6

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACTS al. COMMISSION ACCEPTS ENRON SETTLEMENT VALUED AT $1.5 BILLION The Federal Energy Regulatory-2001 Western energy crisis, said Commission Chairman Joseph T. Kelliher. "The parties are to be congratulated

Laughlin, Robert B.

7

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT-95-191 COMMISSION APPROVES TWO WESTERN POWER SETTLEMENTS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved two markets during the Western energy crisis of 2000-2001. The first case involves a settlement agreement

Laughlin, Robert B.

8

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON,D.C.20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 1290 OF EPACT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a settlement, collectively valued at $6.4 billion, which the Commission has approved stemming from the California energy

Laughlin, Robert B.

9

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT POWER MARKETS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today ordered its staff to conduct investigators will find out if any technical or operational factors, federal or state regulatory prohibitions

Laughlin, Robert B.

10

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT AND FERC STAFF The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today accepted a settlement, valued at nearly $500 stemming from the 2000-2001 energy crisis in California and other Western states. The global settlement

Laughlin, Robert B.

11

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today accepted an agreement between Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. AGREEMENT ACCEPTED BETWEEN ENRON AND NEVADA COMPANIES SETTLING MATTERS STEMMING FROM WESTERN ENERGY CRISIS

Laughlin, Robert B.

12

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT CRISIS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a comprehensive settlement among APX Inc. Coral Power LLC, Puget Sound Energy Inc. and Avista are Supporting Parties. R-07-14 (30) #12;

Laughlin, Robert B.

13

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 21, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 244)] December 21, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 244)] [Proposed Rules] [Page 71331-71333] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr21de99-21] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Parts 71 and 73 RIN 3150-AG41 Advance Notification to Native American Tribes of Transportation of Certain Types of Nuclear Waste AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering an amendment to its regulations that would require NRC licensees to notify

14

Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission More Documents & Publications What to Expect When Readying to Move Spent Nuclear Fuel from...

15

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Risk Management Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This report provides an evaluation of the risk management. Risk management is intended to ensure a methodology for conducting risk management planning, identification, analysis, responses, and monitoring and control activities associated with the SAPHIRE project work, and to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kent Norris

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances  

SciTech Connect

This thirty-second volume of issuances (1--496) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and Administrative Law Judges it covers the period from July 1, 1990 to December 31, 1990. The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a six-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly softbounds and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition. Cross references in the text and indexes are to the NRCI page numbers which are the same as the page numbers in this publication. Issuances are referred to as follows: Commission--CLI, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards--ALAB, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards--LBP, Administrative Law Judges--ALJ, Directors'Decisions--DD, and Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking--DPRM. Specific facilities discussed are: Carroll County Nuclear Station; Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station; Perry Nuclear Power Plant; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Stations; Seabrook Station; Shoreham Nuclear Generating Plant; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant.

Not Available

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project : Adopted Portions of a 1987 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission`s Final Environmental Impact Statement.  

SciTech Connect

The South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project that world produce 6.55 average megawatts of firm energy per year and would be sited in the Snohomish River Basin, Washington, was evaluated by the Federal Energy Regulatory commission (FERC) along with six other proposed projects for environmental effects and economic feasibility Based on its economic analysis and environmental evaluation of the project, the FERC staff found that the South Fork Tolt River Project would be economically feasible and would result in insignificant Impacts if sedimentation issues could be resolved. Upon review, the BPA is adopting portions of the 1987 FERC FEIS that concern the South Fork Tolt River Hydroelectric Project and updating specific sections in an Attachment.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

18

EVALUATION REPORT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2 Attachment OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY OBJECTIVE To determine whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) unclassified cybersecurity program adequately...

19

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management * 20+ years of...

20

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Handling of Beyond Design Basis Events for Nuclear Power Reactors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presenter: Bill Reckley, Chief, Policy and Support Branch, Japan Lessons-Learned Project Directorate, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances  

SciTech Connect

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ), the Directors` Decisions (DD), and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM). The summaries and headnotes preceding the opinions reported herein are not to be deemed a part of those opinions or have any independent legal significance.

NONE

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

22

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STATES OF AMERICA STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Oregon NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (December 3, 2010) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC's application for license for the Reedsport OPT Wave Park Project

23

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

qU oSoLTJRC qU oSoLTJRC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Protecting People and the Environment NUREG-1872, Vol. 2 HudcD [jE©wftamfsýýpc Wafm(M oran EA Office of New Reactors AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room at http:t/www.nrc..ov/reading-rm.html. Publicly released records include, to name a few, NUREG-series publications; Federal Register notices; applicant, licensee, and vendor documents and correspondence; NRC correspondence and internal memoranda; bulletins and information notices; inspection and investigative reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers and their attachments.

24

Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and the Federal Reliability and the Federal and the Federal Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Energy Regulatory Commission Commission Michael Peters Michael Peters Energy Infrastructure & Cyber Security Advisor Energy Infrastructure & Cyber Security Advisor Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 202 202 - - 502 502 - - 8461 8461 Michael.Peters@FERC.GOV Michael.Peters@FERC.GOV The views expressed in this The views expressed in this presentation do not represent the presentation do not represent the views of the Federal Energy views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or the United Regulatory Commission or the United States. States. These views are the personal opinion These views are the personal opinion of Mike Peters!!!! of Mike Peters!!!! ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺

25

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters | Department  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters GC-52 provides legal advice to DOE regarding Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulatory and licensing matters of interest to DOE, either as an NRC license applicant or in connection with related authorities and responsibilities of DOE and NRC on nuclear material, nuclear waste, and nuclear nonproliferation matters. GC-52 attorneys provide advice and support on a variety of NRC matters including regulation and licensing of DOE independent spent fuel storage facilities (ISFSIs) and a mixed-oxide fuel fabrication facility, consultation with NRC on certain DOE waste determinations, and imports and exports of nuclear materials and radioactive sealed sources.

26

Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First United States Nuclear Plant Site in Over 30 Years Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the...

27

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 AUG i 3 1979 ,,~---Y--*. FCAF:Wi3 )I 70-364 : i: SNM-414,jAmendment No. 3 --A Babcock and Wilcox Company Nuclear Materials Division ATTN: Mr. Michael A. Austin Manager, Technical Control 609 North Warren Avenue Apollo, Pennsylvania 15613 Gentiemen: (1 i' \ (. \ In accordance with your application dated June 18, 1979, and pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 70, Materials License SNM-414 is hereby amended to: 1. Delete the function of the Regulatory Projects Coordinator, and 2. Alter the experience requirements for the function of Licensing and Nuclear Safety Specialist. Replacement pages for the license and condition section of the application are attached. Included are changes to License SNM-414 pages to reflect

28

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Quality Assurance Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This report provides an evaluation of the Software Quality Assurance Plan. The Software Quality Assurance Plan is intended to ensure all actions necessary for the software life cycle; verification and validation activities; documentation and deliverables; project management; configuration management, nonconformance reporting and corrective action; and quality assessment and improvement have been planned and a systematic pattern of all actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a software product conforms to established technical requirements; and to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kent Norris

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Quality Assurance Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This report provides an evaluation of the Software Quality Assurance Plan. The Software Quality Assurance Plan is intended to ensure all actions necessary for the software life cycle; verification and validation activities; documentation and deliverables; project management; configuration management, nonconformance reporting and corrective action; and quality assessment and improvement have been planned and a systematic pattern of all actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a software product conforms to established technical requirements; and to meet the contractual commitments prepared by the sponsor; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

30

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Energy Regulatory Commission Energy Regulatory Commission Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Name Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Address 888 First Street, N.E. Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20426 Phone number 1-866-208-3676 Website http://www.ferc.gov/contact-us Coordinates 38.90145°, -77.006248° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.90145,"lon":-77.006248,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

31

Regulatory Commission of Alaska | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Regulatory Commission of Alaska Regulatory Commission of Alaska Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Regulatory Commission of Alaska Name Regulatory Commission of Alaska Address 701 West Eight Ave., Suite 300 Place Anchorage, Alaska Zip 99501-3469 Phone number 907-276-6222 Website http://rca.alaska.gov/RCAWeb/h Coordinates 61.2143463°, -149.8931523° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":61.2143463,"lon":-149.8931523,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

32

Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentationgiven at the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Fall 2008 meetingcovers the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) strategic plan, the Federal Power Act (FPA), current energy security posture, and more.

33

KWOC (Key-Word-Out-of-Context) Index of US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide Series  

SciTech Connect

To meet the objectives of the program funded by the Department of Energy (DOE)-Nuclear Energy (NE) Technology Support Programs, the Performance Assurance Project Office (PAPO) administers a Performance Assurance Information Program that collects, compiles, and distributes program-related information, reports, and publications for the benefit of the DOE-NE program participants. THE KWOC Index of US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide Series'' is prepared as an aid in searching for specific topics in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide Series.

Jennings, S.D.

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

34

NUCLEAR REGULATORY,.COMMISSION REGION I  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGULATORY,.COMMISSION REGULATORY,.COMMISSION REGION I lY,.COMMISSION 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KlNG OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 194061415 GION I NOALE ROAD ENNSYLVANlA 194061415 MAY I5 1996 MAY I5 1996 Docket No. 040-07964 License No. SlJ (Rs Heyman Properties Attention: Mr. John S. Russo Facility Manager 333 Post Road West Westport, CT 06881 SUBJECT: INSPECTION NO. 040-07964/96-001 Dear Mr. Russo: On April 15, 1996, Todd J. Jackson of this office conducted a routine inspection at 737 Canal Street, Stamford, Connecticut of activities o Oliver Incorporated, authorized by Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) Lit SUB-00967. The inspection consisted of observations by the inspect0 interviews with personnel, and a radiological survey by the inspector Jackson was accompanied on this inspection by representatives of the

35

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2012, OAS-L-13-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 OAS-L-13-01 November 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 7, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Daniel M. Weeber Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Administration Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Evaluation Report on "The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2012" BACKGROUND The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is an independent agency within the Department of Energy responsible for, among other things, regulating interstate transmission of the Nation's electricity, natural gas and oil. In addition, the Commission licenses and inspects private, municipal and state hydroelectric projects. To achieve its mission, the Commission relies

36

Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit in Just One Month Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit...

37

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Trunkline LNG Company, LLC Docket No. PF12-8-000 Trunkline LNG Export, LLC Trunkline Gas Company, LLC SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PLANNED LAKE CHARLES LIQUEFACTION PROJECT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES (March 21, 2013) As previously noticed on September 14, 2012, and supplemented herein, the staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) that will discuss the environmental impacts of the Lake Charles Liquefaction Project involving construction and operation of facilities by Trunkline LNG Company, LLC; Trunkline LNG Export, LLC; and Trunkline Gas

38

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC Project No. 12713-002 Oregon NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (December 3, 2010) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Reedsport OPT Wave Park, LLC's application for license for the Reedsport OPT Wave Park Project (FERC Project No. 12713-002), which would be located in Oregon State territorial waters about 2.5 nautical miles off the coast near Reedsport, in Douglas County, Oregon. Staff prepared an environmental assessment (EA), which analyzes the potential environmental effects of licensing the project and concludes that licensing the project,

39

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 18 CFR Chapter I (Docket No. RM05 Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Inquiry (NOI). SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory, the Commission is inviting comments on section 1233 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which defines native load

Laughlin, Robert B.

40

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Project No. 12711-005 Ocean Renewable Power Company Maine, LLC Project No. 12711-005 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED COBSCOOK BAY TIDAL ENERGY PROJECT (January 4, 2012) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Ocean Renewable Power Company, LLC's application for an 8-year pilot license for the proposed Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Project (FERC Project No. 12711-005), which would be located in Cobscook Bay in Washington County, Maine, and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Staff Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Staff Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on the Bulk Power Markets In the United of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, any individual Commissioner, or the Commission itself Power Market, these investigations were directed by the Commission in an undocketed order issued on July

Laughlin, Robert B.

42

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 JAN 2 2 1982 -/ Departmznt'of Ene,rgy ATTN : Dr. William E. Mott, Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division (EP-32) Washington, D.C. 20545 Dear Dr. Mott: Enclosed is the list of contaminated'or potentially contaminated sites that I promised to send you during our recent meeting. The sites have been broken down into the followi,ng four categories: 1. Sites with known contamination that have never been 1 icensed. 2. Formerly licensed sites with known contamination. 3. Currently licensed sites that are being decontaminated prior to decoronissioning. 4. A list of formerly licensed sites that need to be visited to determine if they have been properly decontaminated prior to decommissioning.

43

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (August 9, 2013) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects reviewed the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington's (Snohomish PUD) application for a 10-year license for the proposed Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project No. 12690, which would be located in Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, near the City of Port Townsend, in Island County, Washington, and has prepared a final environmental assessment (FEA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE/EA-1949). In the FEA, Commission staff analyzed the potential environmental effects of

44

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (January 15, 2013) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects reviewed the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington's (Snohomish PUD) application for a 10-year pilot license for the proposed Admiralty Inlet Tidal Project No. 12690, which would be located in Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, near the City of Port Townsend, in Island County, Washington, and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE/EA-1949). In the EA, Commission staff analyzed the potential environmental effects of constructing and

45

U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDE DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDS JUNE 1974 of the specified period the license may be either renewed or terminated by the Commission. Section 50 be decontaminated, as necessary, and inspected by the Commission to determine whether unrestricted access can

46

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cameron LNG, LLC and Cameron LNG, LLC and Docket Nos. CP13-25-000 Cameron Interstate, LLC CP13-27-000 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CAMERON LIQUEFACTION PROJECT (January 10, 2014) The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has prepared a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Cameron Liquefaction Project (Project), proposed by Cameron LNG, LLC and Cameron Interstate Pipeline, LLC (collectively Cameron) in the above-referenced docket. Cameron requests authorization to export 12 million tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) per year from its terminal in Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana. The draft EIS assesses the potential environmental effects of the construction and

47

Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Cooperation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Cooperation to Advance Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Cooperation to Advance Global Nuclear Energy Partnership July 17, 2007 - 2:55pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) expanded cooperation for President Bush's Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that was signed on Friday by DOE's GNEP Deputy Program Manager Paul Lisowski and NRC Executive Director for Operations Luis Reyes. The MOU establishes the foundation for increased cooperation between DOE and NRC on technological research and engineering studies and marks another important milestone

48

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2014 Financial...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 17, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and...

49

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WAWINQTON, 0. C....  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of technology, and the economics of improvements in relation to benefits to the public health and safety.' Surface Contamination The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Division of...

50

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Generation Projects on Federal Lands Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands Presentation covers regulatory considerations for developing...

51

Mr. John Kinneman, Chief Nuclear Materfals Branch Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

111989 111989 Mr. John Kinneman, Chief Nuclear Materfals Branch Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia. Pennsylvania 19406 Dear Mr. Kinneman: -;' .-. 'W Enclosed are the copfes of the final ORNL survey reports on the radiologlcal Surveys conducted on three Teterboro, New Jersey properties; Metpath Incorporated, Allied Aerospace Corporatio; and Sumftomo Machinery Corporation. Copies of these reports have &en sent directly to the owners by our survey contractor Oak Ridge National Laboratory. If you have any questions regardfng these reports. please call me at (301) 353-5439. Sfncerely, Enclosure : < I j i Andrew Wallo III, Designation and Certffication Manager Dfvisfon 01 Facility and Site Oeconanlssionfng Projects

52

Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Oversight  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Oversight Process Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Oversight Process September 19, 2012 Presenter: Undine Shoop, Chief, Health Physics and Human Performance Branch, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Topics covered: Purpose of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) ROP Framework Safety Culture within the ROP Safety Culture Assessments Safety Culture in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Oversight Process More Documents & Publications A Commissioner's Perspective on USNRC Actions in Response to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Comparison of Integrated Safety Analysis (ISA) and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) for Fuel Cycle Facilities, 2/17/11

53

Work for Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Safety Related Applications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nuclear Regulatory Nuclear Regulatory Commission Capabilities Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Overview Energy System Applications Safety-Related Applications Overview DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology Nuclear Regulatory Commission National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Homeland Security Applications Biomedical Applications Millimiter Wave Group Papers Other NPNS Capabilities Work with Argonne Contact us For Employees Site Map Help Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter NE on Flickr Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Safety Related Applications Bookmark and Share Nuclear Regulatory Commission International Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program Key objectives of the International Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program

54

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 FERC ¶ 62,213 4 FERC ¶ 62,213 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION United States Department of Energy Docket No. EF13-5-000 Western Area Power Administration Washoe Project, Stampede Division ORDER CONFIRMING AND APPROVING RATE SCHEDULE ON A FINAL BASIS ( September 5, 2013 ) Summary: On April 24, 2013, the Deputy Secretary of Energy (Deputy Secretary) filed a request for final confirmation and approval of Western Area Power Administration's (Western) Rate Schedule SNF-7, for a non-firm power formula rate applicable to the Washoe Project, Stampede Division (Washoe Project). 1 The Deputy Secretary placed the rates into effect on an interim basis effective August 1, 2013, 2 and requests final confirmation and approval of the rates for the period

55

Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18 Federal Register 18 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 14147-000] Storage Development Partners, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing Applications On April 1, 2011, Storage Development Partners, LLC, filed an application for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the Camp Pendleton Project (project) to be located at Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base, in San Diego County, California. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application

56

Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit in Just One Month Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit in Just One Month March 27, 2007 - 12:10pm Addthis The Entergy Corporation's Grand Gulf Site in Mississippi Receives NRC Approval for an ESP WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today applauded the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) decision to approve an Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Entergy Corporation's Grand Gulf Nuclear Station in Mississippi. This approval, the second ESP this month, demonstrates another major milestone in President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative, which plans to expand the use of safe and clean nuclear power. Earlier this

57

Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First United States Nuclear Plant Site in Over 30 Years Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First United States Nuclear Plant Site in Over 30 Years March 8, 2007 - 10:28am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today commended the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's decision to approve the first-ever Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Exelon Generation Company's Clinton site, in central Illinois. This decision marks a major milestone in the President's plan to expand the use of safe and clean nuclear power. As part of President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative - which seeks to change the way we power this nation - nuclear power will play an increasingly

58

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC Docket No. PF13-4-000 Gulf LNG Energy, LLC Gulf LNG Pipelines, LLC NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME...

59

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service Comm'n ) ) POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S MOTION TO INTERVENE AND COMMENT IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY PETITION AND COMPLAINT Pursuant to Rules 211 and 214 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or the "Commission"), 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.211 and 385.214 (2004), Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") hereby moves to intervene in the above-captioned proceeding and supports the August 24, 2005 Emergency Petition and Complaint filed by the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DC PSC"). As discussed below, Mirant Corporation and its public utility subsidiaries (collectively, "Mirant")

60

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Pat Wood, III of Energy and Ancillary Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent System Operator-746-000 Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Sellers of Long Term Contracts

Laughlin, Robert B.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cybersecurity...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

the Commission utilizes significant amounts of energy market data using a wide range of information technology resources. As attacks become more sophisticated and prevalent, the...

62

Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx) Project Considerations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation covers the existing building commissioning (EBCx) project considerations, and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Rapid City, South Dakota.

63

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2010 Financial Statement Audit  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN TO: IG-34 (A10FN002) SUBJECT: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2010 Financial Statement Audit Report No.: OAS-FS-11-02 TO: Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Fiscal Year 2010 balance sheet and the related statements of net cost, changes in net position, budgetary resources, and custodial activity. To fulfill the Office of Inspector General's audit responsibilities, we contracted with the independent public accounting firm of KPMG LLP (KPMG) to conduct the audit, subject to our review. KPMG is responsible for expressing an opinion on the

64

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service Comm'n ) ) POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER AND ANSWER TO COMMENTS AND PROTESTS Pursuant to Rules 212 and 213 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or the "Commission"), 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.212 and 385.213 (2005), Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") hereby (i) moves for leave to answer and (ii) answers certain of the comments and protests filed in the above-captioned proceeding. 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 On August 24, 2005, Mirant 3 shut down the Potomac River generating station in Alexandria, Virginia (the "Potomac River Plant" or the "Plant") without authority from any court

65

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMISSION COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) July 19,2010 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 1 Docket No. 63-001-HLW 1 (High Level Waste Repository 1 Construction Authorization Application) ) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW Scott Blake Harris Donald P. Irwin Sean A. Lev Michael R. Shebelskie James Bennett McRae HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Riverfront Plaza, East Tower Office of General Counsel 95 1 East Byrd Street Department of Energy Richmond, Virginia 232 19-4074 1000 Independence Avenue, S. W. Washington, D.C. 20585 Counsel for the U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Page . . ........................................................................................................................ Table of Authorities

66

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, July 1987  

SciTech Connect

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards (ALAB), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM).

Not Available

1987-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

67

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, October 1987  

SciTech Connect

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards (ALAB), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM).

Not Available

1987-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

ORISE: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Radiation Exposure Information  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Information and Reporting System (REIRS) Information and Reporting System (REIRS) ORISE maintains large database of radiation exposure records for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Radiation Exposure Information and Reporting System (REIRS) The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is required by federal mandate to maintain and evaluate radiation protection data for workers at facilities that it licenses. As part of its mission of safety, the NRC operates the Radiation Exposure Information and Reporting System (REIRS), a database system containing all occupational radiation exposure records that have been submitted to the NRC under 10 CFR Part 20. REIRS encompasses 1,800-plus NRC licensees and contains more than five million records for more than one million monitored individuals.

69

Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx) Project Considerations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Existing Building Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx) Project Considerations Phil Welker, Executive Director PECI 2 Mapping Out Your Commissioning Strategy Three big questions: 1. Which buildings are commissioning candidates? 2. What commissioning approach(es) should I employ? 3. What expertise do I need to get it done? 3 Which buildings? Many factors come in to play: * Building sizes * Project budgets * Current energy performance * Building control systems * Occupancy rates * Operator/ engineering resources * Long term investment strategy * Sustainability plans or mandates * Equipment Replacements Selecting the right buildings is critical to achieve the maximum benefit in a cost-efficient manner. See the EPA's "A Retrocommissioning Guide for Building Owners"

70

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, January--March 1997  

SciTech Connect

This document provides digests and indexes for issuances of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, the Administrative Law Judges, the Directors Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking. These indexes and digests are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

NONE

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T of Energy and Ancillary Services Investigation of the Practices of the California Independent System of Electric and Natural Gas Prices Enron Power Marketing, Inc. and Enron Energy Services, Inc. Enron Power

Laughlin, Robert B.

72

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T Company v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services Investigation of Practices of the California Independent System Operator and the California Power Exchange Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. Sellers of Energy

Laughlin, Robert B.

73

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T Company v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent.; Avista Energy, Inc.(Avista); Calpine Energy Services, L.P. (Calpine); El Paso Marketing, LP (f/k/a El

Laughlin, Robert B.

74

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T 18 C.F.R. § 385.602 (2006). 4 The Settlement defines the Western Energy Markets as those markets Company v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services Investigation of Practices of the California

Laughlin, Robert B.

75

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 105 FERC ¶ 61,008 Before Commissioners: Pat Wood, III, Chairman; William L. Massey, and Nora Mead Brownell. Reliant Energy Services, Inc. Docket Nos. EL03-59-000 Reliant Energy Coolwater, Inc. IN03-10-000 Reliant Energy Ellwood, Inc. PA02

Laughlin, Robert B.

76

Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory...

77

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BEFORE THE BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service ) Commission ) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER AND ANSWER OF POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY Pursuant to Rule 213 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.213, Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco") hereby moves for leave to answer and answers the Motion for Leave to File Consolidated Answer and Consolidated Answer of Robert G. Burnley, Director of the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality filed on November 10, 2005 ("VDEQ Answer"). For the reasons detailed below, Pepco requests that the Commission reject VDEQ's Answer, or in the alternative, if the

78

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances: February 1995. Volume 41, Number 2  

SciTech Connect

This book contains an issuance of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and a Director`s Decision. The issuance concerns consideration by the Commission of appeals from both the Initial Decision and a Reconsideration Order issued by the Presiding Officer involving two materials license amendment applications filed by the University of Missouri. The Director`s Decision from the Office of Enforcement denies petitions filed by Northeast Utilities employees requesting that accelerated enforcement action be taken against Northeast Utilities for activities concerned with NU`s fitness-for-duty program.

NONE

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Federal Register 8 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. ER10-507-000] ERA MA, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization January 7, 2010. This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of ERA MA, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

80

Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

33 Federal Register 33 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. RM98-1-000] Records Governing Off-the Record Communications Public Notice This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications. Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any oral communication. Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional file

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

82

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

83

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program … 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluation Report Evaluation Report The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2013 OAS-M-14-01 October 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 23, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Evaluation Report on "The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2013" BACKGROUND The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is an independent agency within the Department of Energy (Department) responsible for, among other things, regulating the interstate

84

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NRC's NRC's Integrated Strategy for NRC s Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management Earl Easton 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 25, 2010 Road to Yucca Mountain * 20+ years of preparation for the licensing i review * DOE application received in June 2008 and accepted for review in September 2008 * President Obama pursues alternatives to Yucca Mountain * DOE motion to withdraw in March 2010 2 * DOE motion to withdraw in March 2010 * Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future 2 Growing Spent Fuel Inventory Cumulative Used Nuclear Fuel Scenarios 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 Metric Tons 3 - 50,000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Year Reference: Crozat, March 2010 Integrated Strategy * In response to the evolving national debate on spent fuel management strategy, NRC initiated a number of actions:

85

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2011, OAS-M-12-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 OAS-M-12-01 November 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 15, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Evaluation Report on "The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cyber Security Program - 2011" INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is an independent agency within the Department of Energy responsible for regulating the Nation's oil pipeline, natural gas, hydroelectric and wholesale electric industries. The Commission relies on a wide range of information technology (IT) resources in achieving its mission of assisting consumers in

86

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff practice and procedure digest  

SciTech Connect

This Revision 9 of the fifth edition of the NRC Staff Practice and Procedure Digest contains a digest of a number of Commission, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board, and Atomic Safety and Licensing Board decisions issued during the period from July 1, 1972 to September 30, 1990 interpreting the NRC's Rules of Practice in 10 CFR Part 2. This Revision 9 replaces in part earlier editions and revisions and includes appropriate changes reflecting the amendments to the Rules of Practice effective through September 30, 1990. This edition of the Digest was prepared by attorneys from Aspen Systems Corporation pursuant to Contract number 18-89-346. Persons using this Digest are placed on notice that it may not be used as an authoritative citation in support of any position before the Commission or any of its adjudicatory tribunals. Persons using this Digest are also placed on notice that it is intended for use only as an initial research tool, that it may, and likely does, contain errors, including errors in analysis and interpretation of decisions, and that the user should not rely on the Digest analyses and interpretations but must read, analyze and rely on the user's own analysis of the actual Commission, Appeal Board and Licensing Board decisions cited. Further, neither the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Aspen Systems Corporation, nor any of their employees makes any expressed or implied warranty or assumes liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any material presented in the Digest. The Digest is roughly structured in accordance with the chronological sequence of the nuclear facility licensing process as set forth in Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 2. Those decisions which did not fit into that structure are dealt with in a section on general matters. Where appropriate, particular decisions are indexed under more than one heading. (JF)

Not Available

1991-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input. Comments relevant to the following two sections of the RFI: "Long Term Issues: Managing a Grid with High Penetration of New Technologies" and "Reliability and Cyber-Security," US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Progress Energy draft regarding Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and

88

Improvements needed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Inspector and Auditor  

SciTech Connect

This report discusses the improvements needed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Inspector and Auditor. Also, we raise the possibility of Congress establishing an Office of Inspector General at the Commission. Such an office will ensure that the Congress and the Commissioners receive objective information on problems within the Commission and enhance public trust in the regulation of commercial nuclear power.

Not Available

1981-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

89

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 11:30AM to 1:00PM MDT The purpose of this webinar is to educate NRECA and APPA members, Tribes, and federal energy managers about a few of the regulatory issues that should be considered in developing business plans for distributed generation projects. This webinar is sponsored by the DOE Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs, DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Tribal Energy Program, Western Area Power Administration, DOE Federal Energy Management Program, DOE Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, and the American Public Power

90

Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design A report on an independent study to assess various potential impacts of the proposed rulemaking by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), "Remedying Undue Discrimination through Open Access Transmission Service and Standard Electricity Market Design." Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design More Documents & Publications Electric System Decision Making in Other Regions: A Preliminary Analysis Prepared for Western Interstate Energy Board Committee on Regional Electric

91

2014 TUNL REU PROJECTS 1. Commissioning the Enge Spectrometer...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

TUNL REU PROJECTS 1. Commissioning the Enge Spectrometer's Focal Plane Detector Advisor: Richard Longland REU Student: Robert Leonard (Georgia Tech) The Enge Split-Pole...

92

Report of the State of Nevada Commission on Nuclear Projects  

SciTech Connect

This third biennial Report of the Nevada Commission on Nuclear Projects has been prepared in fulfillment of the requirements of NRS 459.0092, which stipulates that the Commission shall report to the Governor and Legislature on any matter relating to radioactive waste disposal the Commission deems appropriate and advise and make recommendations on the policy of the State concerning nuclear waste disposal projects. Chapter One of the Report presents a brief overview of the Commission`s functions and statutory charges. It also contains a summary of developments which have affected the overall nuclear waste disposl issue since the last Commission Report was published in November, 1988. Chapter Two contains a synthesis of Commission activities and reports on the findings of the Commission relative to the geotechnical, environmental, socioeconomic, transportation, intergovernmental and legal aspects of federal and State nuclear waste program efforts.

NONE

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

93

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit, OAS-FS-13-03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Energy Regulatory Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-13-03 November 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 15, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2012 Financial Statement Audit The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of net costs, changes in net position, budgetary

94

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." August 1, 2011 - 1:59pm Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." Addthis Related Articles Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response DOE and FERC Joint Public Statement on Back Stop Siting

95

Project Sponsors: California Energy Commission Advanced Power and Energy Program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Project Sponsors: California Energy Commission Advanced Power and Energy Program ADVANCED POWER by the California Energy Commission (CEC) in its 2012 solicitation After the intersections were scored, Voronoi & ENERGY PROGRAM www.apep.uci.edu RESULTS For each of the specified 68 station locations, nearby major

Mease, Kenneth D.

96

Energy Project Development, Finance, and Commissioning Resources...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Financing FEMP Sample RFP Documents. Other Resources: Energy Efficiency for Water-Wastewater Projects RFP Guidance Project Finance Innovative financing solutions that enable...

97

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances: Volume 46, Number 6  

SciTech Connect

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ), the Directors` Decision (DD), and the Decision on Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM). The summaries and headnotes preceding the opinions reported herein are not to be deemed a part of those opinions or have any independent legal significance.

NONE

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, January--March 1996  

SciTech Connect

This publication is the 1st quarter 1996 index to issuances by the US NRC. These include issuances by the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, the Administrative Law Judges, the Directors` Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking.

NONE

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances. Volume 46, Number 1  

SciTech Connect

This report includes the issuances received during the specified period from the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ), the Directors` Decisions (DD), and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM). The summaries and headnotes preceding the opinions reported herein are not to be deemed a part of those opinions or have any independent legal significance.

NONE

1997-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission organization charts and functional statements  

SciTech Connect

This document is the organizational chart for the US NRC. It contains organizational structure and functional statements for the following: (1) the Commission, (2) committees and boards, (3) staff offices, (4) office of the Inspector General, (5) executive director for operations, (6) program offices, and (7) regional offices.

NONE

1996-08-19T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certifies HalfPACT Transportation Container  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certifies U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certifies HalfPACT Transportation Container CARLSBAD, N.M., November 20, 2000 - The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Certificate of Compliance November 2 for the HalfPACT transportation container. The HalfPACT will be used to supplement the Transuranic Package Transporter Model 2 (TRUPACT-II) for transportation of waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The TRUPACT-II is currently used for transportation of waste to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The new container is approximately 30 inches shorter than the TRUPACT-II. The HalfPACT is designed to carry seven 55-gallon drums weighing up to 1,000 pounds each, but is also capable of carrying one standard waste box or four 85-gallon drums.

102

File:Federal Hydropower - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.pdf | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Federal Hydropower - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.pdf Federal Hydropower - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Metadata File:Federal Hydropower - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.pdf Size of this preview: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 × 600 pixels. Go to page 1 2 Go! next page → next page → Full resolution ‎(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 740 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 2 pages) File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 15:32, 22 May 2013 Thumbnail for version as of 15:32, 22 May 2013 1,275 × 1,650, 2 pages (740 KB) Graham7781 (Talk | contribs) You cannot overwrite this file. Edit this file using an external application (See the setup

103

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances: Opinions and decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with selected orders, July 1--December 31, 1996. Volume 44, Pages 1--432  

SciTech Connect

The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a six-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly softbounds and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition. Cross references in the text and indexes are to the NRCI page numbers which are the same as the page numbers in this publication. Issuances are referred to as follows: Commission--CLI, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards--LBP, Administrative Law Judges--ALJ, Directors` Decisions--DD, and Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking--DPRM.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances. Opinions and decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with selected orders, July 1, 1990--December 31, 1990: Volume 32  

SciTech Connect

This thirty-second volume of issuances (1--496) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and Administrative Law Judges it covers the period from July 1, 1990 to December 31, 1990. The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a six-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly softbounds and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition. Cross references in the text and indexes are to the NRCI page numbers which are the same as the page numbers in this publication. Issuances are referred to as follows: Commission--CLI, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards--ALAB, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards--LBP, Administrative Law Judges--ALJ, Directors`Decisions--DD, and Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking--DPRM. Specific facilities discussed are: Carroll County Nuclear Station; Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station; Perry Nuclear Power Plant; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Stations; Seabrook Station; Shoreham Nuclear Generating Plant; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant.

Not Available

1990-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

105

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances, January 1996--June 1996  

SciTech Connect

Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, The Administrative Law Judges, the Director`s Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking are presented in this document. The digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances. Information elements common the cases hear and ruled upon are displayed in one or more of five formats: case name index, headers and digests, legal citations index, subject index, and facility index.

NONE

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, Volume 46, No. 4  

SciTech Connect

This report includes the issuances received in October 1997. Issuances are from the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and the Directors` Decisions. Five issuances were received on the following subjects: (1) decontamination and decommissioning funding for Sequoyah Fuels Corporation and General Atomics; (2) involvement in NRC-licensed activities by Aharon Ben-Haim; (3) Barnett Industrial X-Ray, Inc.; (4) spent fuel storage installation at Northern States Power Company; and (5) Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. No issuances were received from the the Administrative Law Judges or the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, Volume 44, No. 4  

SciTech Connect

This report includes the issuances received in October 1996. Issuances are from the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and the Directors` Decisions. 15 issuances were received and are abstracted individually in the database: Louisiana Energy Services, U.S. Enrichment Corporation, Yankee Atomic Electric Company, General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation, James L. Shelton, Juan Guzman, Northern States Power Company, TESTCO Inc., Washington Public Power Supply System, all nuclear plants, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Duke Power Company, Florida Power Corporation, and Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (2 issuances). No issuances were received from the the Administrative Law Judges or the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking.

NONE

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Leased Warehouse Space, CR-B-96-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AUDIT OF THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LEASED WAREHOUSE SPACE The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet 5 to 7 days after publication at the following alternative addresses:

109

Energy Department Issues Draft Request For Proposal for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensed Facilities Procurement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Cincinnati The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Draft Request for Proposal (DRFP) for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Licensed Facilities procurement. The NRC Licensed Facilities procurement is one of the four procurements that resulted from the Idaho Site Office of Environmental Management Post FY 2015 Acquisition Planning.

110

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit, OAS-FS-12-01  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Financial Statement Audit OAS-FS-12-01 November 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 15, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Statement Audit The attached report presents the results of the independent certified public accountants' audit of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) Fiscal Year 2011 balance sheet and the related statements of net cost, changes in net position, budgetary resources, and custodial activity.

111

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, July-December 1997  

SciTech Connect

Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, the Administrative Law Judges, the Directors` Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking are presented in this document. These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances. Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are: Case name (owner(s) of facility); Full text reference (volume and pagination); Issuance number Issues raised by appellants; Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes); Name of facility, Docket number; Subject matter of issues and/or rulings; Type of hearing (operating license, operating license amendment, etc); Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.). These information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats: Case Name Index, Headers and Digests, Legal Citations Index, Subject Index, and Facility Index.

NONE

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances. Opinions and decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with selected orders, July 1, 1994--December 31, 1994. Volume 40, Pages 1--387  

SciTech Connect

The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a six-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly softbounds and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition. Cross references in the text and indexes are to the NRCI page numbers which are the same as the page numbers in this publication. This book covers the following: issuances of the NRC; issuances of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards; and issuances of Directors` decisions.

NONE

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

113

Measurement and Verification for Commissioning Projects: Challenges and Opportunities  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ESL-IC-10/05-49 1 Measurement and Verification for Commissioning Projects: Challenges and Opportunities Kristin Heinemeier, Ph.D., P.E. Portland Energy Conservation, Inc., Sacramento CA Measurement and Verification (M&V) is a key...&Vwith publication of documents such as the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) and ASHRAEs Guideline for Measurement of Energy and Demand Savingsthe continuing evolution of innovative energy saving technologies, processes...

Heinemeier, K.

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Transportation Security Rulemaking Activities at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AT THE AT THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION R. Clyde Ragland, P.E. Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response 2011 DOE National Transportation Stakeholders Forum May 11, 2011 2 NRC Focus Prior to September 11, 2001 * Historically, NRC Transportation Security Regulations Focused on Highest Risk Radioactive Material, consisted of Special Nuclear Material (SNM) and Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) NRC Actions Since September 11, 2001 * Domestically, reviewed materials transported by NRC licensees and re- evaluated security requirements considering: - applicable threats to shipments - material considerations - magnitude of adverse consequences * Internationally, participated in the development of the IAEA Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive

115

Report on the establishment and operation of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Daycare Center  

SciTech Connect

We have completed an inspection of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) Daycare Center (Center). The purpose of the inspection was to review for efficiency, economy and compliance with laws and regulations, FERC's establishment and operation of the Center. The inspection objectives were to review: (1) FERC's compliance with Federal laws and requirements of the General Services Administration and the District of Columbia; (2) the source and amount of funds for establishing and operating the Center; and (3) the organizational relationships between FERC, the Center and the contractor operating the Center.

Not Available

1991-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

116

The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States Department Of Energy Public Meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 The UNITED STATES 3 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and 4 the UNITED STATES 5 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 6 7 PUBLIC MEETING 8 9 DISCUSSION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 3116 OF 10 THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 11 12 Commencing at 9:10 a.m., November 16, 2006 13 at the L'Enfant Plaza Hotel 14 480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW 15 Washington DC 20024 16 17 Public meeting organized by: 18 Advanced Technologies and Laboratories International, Inc. 19 20010 Century Boulevard, Suite 500 20 Germantown, Maryland 20874 21 (301) 972-4430 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. CAMERON: Good morning everyone. My name is Chip Cameron. I'm an assistant general counsel in the office of General Counsel at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. And I would like to

117

Special committee review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's severe accident risks report (NUREG--1150)  

SciTech Connect

In April 1989, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) published a draft report Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five US Nuclear Power Plants,'' NUREG-1150. This report updated, extended and improved upon the information presented in the 1974 Reactor Safety Study,'' WASH-1400. Because the information in NUREG-1150 will play a significant role in implementing the NRC's Severe Accident Policy, its quality and credibility are of critical importance. Accordingly, the Commission requested that the RES conduct a peer review of NUREG-1150 to ensure that the methods, safety insights and conclusions presented are appropriate and adequately reflect the current state of knowledge with respect to reactor safety. To this end, RES formed a special committee in June of 1989 under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The Committee, composed of a group of recognized national and international experts in nuclear reactor safety, was charged with preparing a report reflecting their review of NUREG-1150 with respect to the adequacy of the methods, data, analysis and conclusions it set forth. The report which precedes reflects the results of this peer review.

Kouts, H.J.C. (Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (USA)); Apostolakis, G.; Kastenberg, W.E. (California Univ., Los Angeles, CA (USA)); Birkhofer, E.H.A. (Gesellschaft fuer Reaktorsicherheit mbH (GRS), Koeln (Germany, F.R.)); Hoegberg, L.G. (Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm (Sweden)); LeSage, L.G. (Argonne National Lab., IL (USA)); Rasmussen, N.C. (Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Camb

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Project Programming and Commissioning as a Risk Mitigation and Threat Analysis Tool  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

As a quality process, commissioning has been successfully used in the design, construction and validation process for over a decade with valuable results. Owners of high risk and complex projects are now starting to use the commissioning process...

Weiss, M. L.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

The intermountain power project commissioning - Subsynchronous torsional interaction tests  

SciTech Connect

Subsyncronous torsional vibration as a result of electrochemical interaction between the HVDC controls and a turbine-generator was first discovered during the commissioning of the Square Butte Project in 1977. The level of interaction between the HVDC controls and the turbine-generator depends on several interacting factors: the characteristic torsional frequencies of the turbine-generator, the bandwidth of the HVDC controls and the relative strength of the connecting ac system. For the Intermountain Power Project (IPP), early analysis of these interacting factors indicated that there exist definite potential for subsynchronous oscillation to occur. The calculated torsional frequencies of the IPP units showed that the first mode frequency is 14.0 Hz and is within the typical bandwidth of an HVDC control which is between 10-20 Hz. The HVDC controls, therefore, can influence the torsional stability of the IPP units. Further, the IPP turbine-generators are required to operate isolated on the HVDC rectifier terminal, with no other interconnecting ac network. This ''radial'' mode of operation will result in maximum interaction between the converter station and the IPP units. It became obvious that special measure must be implemented in the design of the IPP HVDC control system to modify its typical characteristics to avoid the occurrence of the subsynchronous oscillation. This paper presents the results of the subsynchronous torsional interaction (SSTI) tests that were performed during the commissioning of the IPP Unit 1 and the HVDC Transmission system.

Wu, C.T.; Peterson, K.J. (Dept. of Water and Power, Los Angeles, CA (US)); Pinko, R.J.; Kankam, M.D.; Baker, D.H. (General Electric Co., Schenectady, NY (US))

1988-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

September 10, 2003, Board Public Meeting - Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approach to Oversight  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 25 63 carefully, also. In fact, I would like to put in the r e c o r d at this point a letter that the Board sent to Admiral Bowman complimenting him on those reports , because we find them very helpful. Thank you. Any other questions? DR. MANSFIELD: I second that: especially the radiological safety reports and environmental reports. CHAIFWAN CONWAY: Yes , very important , and we thank you. We thank you for your assistance here today . Thank you very much. Now we have the experienced representatives from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Ms. Cynthia Carpenter and Dr. Edwin Hackett. If you would each introduce yourselves for the record. MS. CARPENTER: Good morning. My name is Cynthia Carpenter. I'm the Deputy Director of the Division of Inspection Program Management from the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Report to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, 1986  

SciTech Connect

This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) is devoted to the activities performed during calendar year 1986. Comments and observations are provided on operating experience at nuclear power plants and other NRC licensees, including results from selected AEOD studies; summaries of abnormal occurrences involving US nuclear plants; reviews of licensee event reports and their quality, reactor scram experience from 1984 to 1986, engineered safety features actuations, and the trends and patterns analysis program; and assessments of nonreactor and medical misadministration events. In addition, the report provides the year-end status of all recommendations included in AEOD studies, and listings of all AEOD reports issued from 1980 through 1986.

none,

1987-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

122

Improvements needed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Inspector and Auditor. Report to the Congress  

SciTech Connect

To help the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) carry out its responsibilities, a special office of Inspector and Auditor was created in April 1975 to independently review and appraise all NRC operations. This office, in essence, was to provide the Commissioners with oversight over NRC programs and activities and recommend corrective actions. GAO found that the Office of Inspector and Auditor has not been using proven management techniques in scheduling and carrying out its work. These techniques range from systematic planning and prioritization to timely and consistent followup on work. If such techniques were used, it would result in a more orderly management approach and lead to higher quality reports and a better use of staff resources. The independence of the Office of Inspector and Auditor needs to be strengthened. In GAO's view, this only may be possible if NRC accepts and implements the recommendations contained in this report. GAO also suggests that Congress consider establishing a statutory Inspector General office at the NRC. Such an office could help ensure that the Congress and the Commissioners receive objective information on problems within the Commission and enhance public trust in the regulation of commercial nuclear power.

Not Available

1981-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

123

Site-specific parameter values for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's food pathway dose model  

SciTech Connect

Routine operations at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in Western South Carolina result in radionuclide releases to the atmosphere and to the Savannah River. The resulting radiation doses to the off-site maximum individual and the off-site population within 80 km of the SRS are estimated on a yearly basis. These estimates are currently generated using dose models prescribed for the commercial nuclear power industry by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC provides default values for dose-model parameters for facilities without resources to develop site-specific values. A survey of land- and water-use characteristics for the Savannah River area has been conducted to determine site-specific values for water recreation, consumption, and agricultural parameters used in the NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 (1977) dosimetric models. These site parameters include local characteristics of meat, milk, and vegetable production; recreational and commercial activities on the Savannah River; and meat, milk, vegetable, and seafood consumption rates. This paper describes how parameter data were obtained at the Savannah River Site and the impacts of such data on off-site dose. Dose estimates using site-specific parameter values are compared to estimates using the NRC default values.

Hamby, D.M. (Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC (United States))

1992-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

Project Information Form Project Title Program for Vehicle Regulatory Reform: Assessing Life Cycle-Based  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

,931.44 Total Project Cost $98,931.44 Agency ID or Contract Number DTRT13-G-UTC29 Start and End Dates November 1Project Information Form Project Title Program for Vehicle Regulatory Reform: Assessing Life Cycle, 2014 ­ October 31, 2015 Brief Description of Research Project Current greenhouse gas emissions

California at Davis, University of

125

Unique Regulatory Approach for Licensing the Port Hope Remediation Project in Canada - 13315  

SciTech Connect

The Port Hope remediation project is a part of a larger initiative of the Canadian Federal Government the Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) which is based upon a community proposal. The Government of Canada, through Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is investing $1.28 billion over 10 years to clean up historic low-level radioactive waste in the Port Hope Area and to provide long-term safe management of the low-level radioactive wastes in the Port Hope Area. These wastes arose from the activities of a former Federal Crown Corporation (Eldorado Nuclear) and its private sector predecessors. In Canada, historic waste are defined as low-level radioactive waste that was managed in a manner no longer considered acceptable, but for which the original producer cannot reasonably be held responsible or no longer exists and for which the Federal Government has accepted responsibility. In Canada, under the current regulatory framework, the environmental remediation is not considered as a distinct phase of the nuclear cycle. The regulatory approach for dealing with existing sites contaminated with radioactive residues is defined on the basis of risk and application of existing regulations. A unique regulatory approach was taken by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to address the various licensing issues and to set out the requirements for licensing of the Port Hope Project within the current regulatory framework. (authors)

Kostova, M.; Howard, D.; Elder, P. [Directorate of Nuclear Cycle and Facilities Regulation, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, 280, Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 (Canada)] [Directorate of Nuclear Cycle and Facilities Regulation, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, 280, Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 (Canada)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Interconnection Queue Practices Technical Conference December 11, 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Electric Transmission Congestion Study National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Workshop December 8, 2011 Hilton St. Louis Airport, 10330 Natural Bridge Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63134 Presented by: Jerry Lein Public Utility Analyst North Dakota Public Service Commission Phone: 701 328-1035 Fax: 701 328-2410 jlein@nd.gov Overview * ND Electric Energy Resources * Need for New Transmission - Interconnection Difficulties - Transmission Constraints * Regional Transmission Projects Update * Capacity Deliverability between RTOs ND Electric Energy Resources * ND Ranked #1 in U.S. for Wind Energy Potential - 1991 Pacific Northwest Labs study found ND Wind could potentially supply 36% of U.S. electric energy consumption. -

127

Project Sponsors: California Energy CommissionADVANCED POWER & ENERGY www.apep.uci.edu  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Project Sponsors: California Energy CommissionADVANCED POWER & ENERGY PROGRAM www coincident time period (i.e., hourly resolution of 2005). Wind, solar, geothermal, and hydroelectric The Renewable Energy Secure Community (RESCO) project is a program sponsored by the California Energy Commission

Mease, Kenneth D.

128

Retro-Commissioning Phase I Demonstration Project Shanghai, China  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

July of 2004, our firm was contracted to complete the initial phase for a typical retro-commissioning process conducted on three high-rise commercial buildings in Shanghai, China. This work was sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency...

Keithly, P.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Continuous Commissioning: A Valuable Partner to Retrofit Projects  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-hand corner. Prior to commissioning, any changes in the duct static pressure or discharge air temperature setpoints did not affect the VFD speed. The operation of five AHUs was analyzed using the data collected through the EMCS. Table 2 presents summarized... to the facility personnel, there were a high number of hot call complaints during the summer period. The supply air fan was running at 100% speed and was not modulating with the load. The actual static pressure was less than 0.3?H2O even though the setpoint...

Turner, W. D.; Banks, K.; Athar, A.; Yazdani, B.; Zhu, Y.; Culp, C.

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Continuous Commissioning Leading Energy Project Process - An Industry Approach  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

five months after CC completion 0 40,000 80,000 120,000 160,000 200,000 Jan FebMar AprMayJun Jul AugSep Oct Nov Dec HV AC E l e c tr i c i t y , k W h / m o n Pre-CC (2002-2003) Post-CC (2003-2004) HVAC Electricity Consumption Comparison... Gas Consumption Comparison 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec C ons um pt i on ( The r m s ) Pre-CC (2002) Post-CC (2003-2004) 8 ESL-IC-10/05-17 CCLRP Project Brief 2: Building Information...

Liu, M.; Wang, J.; Hansen, K.; Seltzer, A.

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

Report to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission on analysis and evaluation of operational data - 1987: Power reactors  

SciTech Connect

This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) is devoted to the activities performed during 1987. The report is published in two volumes. NUREG-1272, Vol. 2, No. 1, covers Power Reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry, with comments regarding the trends of some key performance measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year, and summarizes information from Licensee Event Reports, the NRC's Operations Center, and Diagnostic Evaluations. NUREG-1272, Vol. 2, No. 2, covers Nonreactors and presents a review of the nonreactors events and misadministration reports that were reported in 1987 and a brief synopsis of AEOD studies published in 1987. Each volume contains a list of the AEOD Reports issued for 1980-1987.

none,

1988-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

EMI/RFI and Power Surge Withstand Guidance for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This paper discusses the regulatory guidance implemented by U.S. NRC for minimizing malfunctions and upsets in safety-related instrumentation and control (I and C) systems in nuclear power plants caused by electromagnetic interference (EMI), radio-frequency interference (RFI), and power surges. The engineering design, installation, and testing practices deemed acceptable to U.S. NRC are described in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.180, ''Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic and Radio-Frequency in Safety-Related Instrumentation and Control Systems'' (January 2000) and in a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) endorsing EPRI TR-102323, ''Guidelines for Electromagnetic Interference Testing in Power Plants,'' (April 1996). These engineering practices provide a well-established, systematic approach for ensuring electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and surge withstand capability (SWC).

Ewing, PD

2001-09-07T23:59:59.000Z

133

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, July--December 1996. Volume 44, Index 2  

SciTech Connect

Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ), the Directors` Decisions (DD), and the Decision on Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM) are presented in this document. These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances. Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are: case name (owner(s) of facility); full text reference (volume and pagination); issuance number; issues raised by apellants; legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes); name of facility, docket number; subject matter of issues and/or rulings; type of hearing (operating license, operating license amendment, etc.); type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).

NONE

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

Monitoring Based Commissioning: Benchmarking Analysis of 24 UC/CSU/IOU Projects  

SciTech Connect

Buildings rarely perform as intended, resulting in energy use that is higher than anticipated. Building commissioning has emerged as a strategy for remedying this problem in non-residential buildings. Complementing traditional hardware-based energy savings strategies, commissioning is a 'soft' process of verifying performance and design intent and correcting deficiencies. Through an evaluation of a series of field projects, this report explores the efficacy of an emerging refinement of this practice, known as monitoring-based commissioning (MBCx). MBCx can also be thought of as monitoring-enhanced building operation that incorporates three components: (1) Permanent energy information systems (EIS) and diagnostic tools at the whole-building and sub-system level; (2) Retro-commissioning based on the information from these tools and savings accounting emphasizing measurement as opposed to estimation or assumptions; and (3) On-going commissioning to ensure efficient building operations and measurement-based savings accounting. MBCx is thus a measurement-based paradigm which affords improved risk-management by identifying problems and opportunities that are missed with periodic commissioning. The analysis presented in this report is based on in-depth benchmarking of a portfolio of MBCx energy savings for 24 buildings located throughout the University of California and California State University systems. In the course of the analysis, we developed a quality-control/quality-assurance process for gathering and evaluating raw data from project sites and then selected a number of metrics to use for project benchmarking and evaluation, including appropriate normalizations for weather and climate, accounting for variations in central plant performance, and consideration of differences in building types. We performed a cost-benefit analysis of the resulting dataset, and provided comparisons to projects from a larger commissioning 'Meta-analysis' database. A total of 1120 deficiency-intervention combinations were identified in the course of commissioning the projects described in this report. The most common location of deficiencies was in HVAC equipment (65% of sites), followed by air-handling and distributions systems (59%), cooling plant (29%), heating plants (24%), and terminal units (24%). The most common interventions were adjusting setpoints, modifying sequences of operations, calibration, and various mechanical fixes (each done in about two-thirds of the sites). The normalized rate of occurrence of deficiencies and corresponding interventions ranged from about 0.1/100ksf to 10/100ksf, depending on the issue. From these interventions flowed significant and highly cost-effective energy savings For the MBCx cohort, source energy savings of 22 kBTU/sf-year (10%) were achieved, with a range of 2% to 25%. Median electricity savings were 1.9 kWh/sf-year (9%), with a range of 1% to 17%. Peak electrical demand savings were 0.2 W/sf-year (4%), with a range of 3% to 11%. The aggregate commissioning cost for the 24 projects was $2.9 million. We observed a range of normalized costs from $0.37 to 1.62/sf, with a median value of $1.00/sf for buildings that implemented MBCx projects. Per the program design, monitoring costs as a percentage of total costs are significantly higher in MBCx projects (median value 40%) than typical commissioning projects included in the Meta-analysis (median value of 2% in the commissioning database). Half of the projects were in buildings containing complex and energy-intensive laboratory space, with higher associated costs. Median energy cost savings were $0.25/sf-year, for a median simple payback time of 2.5 years. Significant and cost-effective energy savings were thus obtained. The greatest absolute energy savings and shortest payback times were achieved in laboratory-type facilities. While impacts varied from project to project, on a portfolio basis we find MBCx to be a highly cost-effective means of obtaining significant program-level energy savings across a variety of building types. Energy savings are ex

Mills, Evan; Mathew, Paul

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

135

Opinions and decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with selected orders, July 1, 1995--December 31, 1995. Volume 42, Pages 1-258  

SciTech Connect

This is the 42nd volume of issuances of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and its Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, Administrative Law Judges, and Office Directors. This book is a reprinting, containing corrections of numerous printing errors in a previously distributed book. It covers the period from July 1, 1995 to December 31, 1995. Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards conduct adjudicatory hearings on applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants and related facilities, and issue initial decisions which, subject to internal review and appellate procedures, become the final Commission action with respect to those applications. The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a 6-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly editions and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition.

NONE

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

136

USING TECHNOLOGY TO SUPPORT PROACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF MATERIALS DEGRADATION FOR THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

SciTech Connect

The majority of the U.S. reactor fleet is applying for license renewal to extend the operating life from the current 40 years to 60 years, and there is now active interest in extending the operating life to beyond 60 years. Many plants are also applying for increases in power rating and both of these changes increases the need for an improved understanding of materials degradation. Many materials degrade over time and much is known about the degradation of materials under normal environmental conditions; however, less is known about the characteristics of materials degradation when the environment is subject to higher than normal radiological conditions over extended periods of time. Significant efforts are being made by industrial, academic and regulatory groups worldwide to identify, classify and mitigate potential problems arising from degradation of components in this context. From a regulatory perspective, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) is very interested in being able to identify ways to insure their licensees proactively manage the identification of materials degradation and the mitigation of its effects. To date, the USNRC has consolidated generic programs for mitigating aging issues in the two volume Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report (NUREG-1801) [1][2], and have encouraged applicants for license renewal to use these programs where applicable in their plant when applying for renew of their reactors license. The USNRC has also published a comprehensive report entitled Expert Panel Report on Proactive Materials Degradation (NUREG/CR-6923) [3] that inventories the types of degradation mechanisms that could exist in each component of a Light Water Reactor (LWR) and each degradation mechanism is assessed regarding how much is known about mitigating its effects. Since the number of plant designs and materials used varies greatly within the U.S. fleet, there are many variations to implementing aging management programs (AMPs), requiring significant dialogs between the Licensee and the USNRC. These discussions are part of the licensing basis and as such are documented with up to multi-hundred page responses that are loosely coupled through the USNRC Agency-wide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which serves as an electronic records repository for the USNRC . These discussions have supported revisions to the GALL, including the revision that is being prepared as this paper is being written. The USNRC has sought the help of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to improve the staffs ability to navigate the significant numbers of documents that are generated in this process and to provide a forum for regulators, licensees and researchers to share knowledge in the efforts to improve the cyclic process for defining, applying, validating and re-defining AMPs. Work to date in this area is publicly accessible and this paper will describe that work and outline a potential path forward. The presenter will also demonstrate the capabilities of the PMMD information tools (http://pmmd.pnl.gov).

Taylor, W Boyd; Knobbs, Katherine J.; Carpenter, C. E. (Gene) [Gene; Malik, Shah

2010-07-19T23:59:59.000Z

137

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances  

SciTech Connect

This document is the March 1996 listing of NRC issuances. Included are: (1) NRC orders granting Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company`s petition for review of the ASLB order LBP-95-17, (2) NRC orders relating to the potential disqualification of two commissioners in the matter of the decommissioning of Yankee Nuclear Power Station, (3) ASLB orders pertaining to the Oncology Services Corporation, (4) ASLB orders pertaining to the Radiation Oncology Center, (5) ASLB orders pertaining to the Yankee Nuclear Power Station, and (6) Director`s decision pertaining to the Yankee Nuclear Power Station.

NONE

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

Commissioning | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Commissioning Commissioning Commissioning October 16, 2013 - 4:43pm Addthis Project Construction Commissioning Operations & Maintenance Commissioning renewable energy for new construction projects and major renovations requires special consideration in selecting the commissioning agent and team, developing the specifications, conducting the full commissioning process, and integrating measurement and verification (M&V) systems. Commissioning can reduce overall costs related to construction deficiencies and ensure more efficient building and systems operation. For new construction projects or major renovations with renewable energy systems, commissioning is critical to the ultimate goal of operating all building systems as safely, optimally, and efficiently as their designers intended.

139

The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT 05602  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Loads to Resources (and Resources to Loads) 1. Targeted energy efficiency 2. Orient solar panels 3. Use State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT 05602 Phone: 802-223-8199 web: www.raponline.org Resource MaterialsThe Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT 05602 Phone: 802

California at Davis, University of

140

Carbon Capture and Storage Projects Overcoming Legal and Regulatory Barriers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2006/1236 2006/1236 June 23, 2006 International Carbon Capture and Storage Projects Overcoming Legal Barriers Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners (Revised)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

23 23 Revised February 2010 Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners Katharine Kollins Duke University Bethany Speer and Karlynn Cory National Renewable Energy Laboratory National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-46723 Revised February 2010 Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners Katharine Kollins Duke University Bethany Speer and Karlynn Cory

142

Commissioning Process | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Process Process Commissioning Process October 16, 2013 - 4:44pm Addthis The commissioning process is designed to verify that a renewable energy project meets specified agency design, performance, and operational requirements. To ensure that the level and focus of commissioning efforts are appropriate to the scope and complexity of the project, the commissioning planning process should begin at the same time as the design phase of the project. Integrating Commissioning Into the Design Process Developing a Detailed Commissioning Plan Testing Systems and Providing Commissioning Reports Performing Enhanced Commissioning Delivering Final Documentation Integrating Commissioning Into the Design Process The commissioning agent should attend design team meetings, review the

143

California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research/Energy System Integration -- Transmission-Planning Research & Development Scoping Project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission Transmission Planning Analysis92, No. 5, Dec. CEC (California Energy Commission). 2004.of MCPs. California Energy Commission. Nov. CERTS PIER

Eto, Joseph H.; Lesieutre, Bernard; Widergren, Steven

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

Regulatory guidance document  

SciTech Connect

The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Program Management System Manual requires preparation of the OCRWM Regulatory Guidance Document (RGD) that addresses licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance. The document provides: regulatory compliance policy; guidance to OCRWM organizational elements to ensure a consistent approach when complying with regulatory requirements; strategies to achieve policy objectives; organizational responsibilities for regulatory compliance; guidance with regard to Program compliance oversight; and guidance on the contents of a project-level Regulatory Compliance Plan. The scope of the RGD includes site suitability evaluation, licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance, in accordance with the direction provided by Section 4.6.3 of the PMS Manual. Site suitability evaluation and regulatory compliance during site characterization are significant activities, particularly with regard to the YW MSA. OCRWM`s evaluation of whether the Yucca Mountain site is suitable for repository development must precede its submittal of a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Accordingly, site suitability evaluation is discussed in Chapter 4, and the general statements of policy regarding site suitability evaluation are discussed in Section 2.1. Although much of the data and analyses may initially be similar, the licensing process is discussed separately in Chapter 5. Environmental compliance is discussed in Chapter 6. Safety and Health compliance is discussed in Chapter 7.

NONE

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

Uranium recovery research sponsored by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission at Pacific Northwest Laboratory. Quarterly progress report, June-September 1983  

SciTech Connect

This report documents progress for the following major research projects: stabilization, engineering, and monitoring alternatives assessment for improving regulation of uranium recovery operations and waste management; attenuation of radon emission from uranium tailings; assessment of leachate movement from uranium mill tailings; and methods of minimizing ground-water contaminants from in-situ leach uranium mining.

Foley, M.G.; Deutsch, W.J.; Gee, G.W.; Hartley, J.N.; Kalkwarf, D.R.; Mayer, D.W.; Nelson, R.W.; Opitz, B.E.; Peterson, S.R.; Serne, R.J.

1983-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT5002011029 #12; CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Janna Franks Primary Author Janna Franks Project members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily

147

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor FEBRUARY 2013 CEC3002013002SD #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Lorraine Gonzalez Angela Gould Primary Authors and Project Managers Kate Zocchetti

148

Guidelines and Checklist for Commissioning and Government Acceptance of ESPC ENABLE Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Document provides guidance and a checklist to help agencies through the final steps of the ESPC ENABLE project, including project acceptance. By accepting the work of the energy service company (ESCO), the agency is confirming that the energy conservation measures have been installed to the specifications of the contract and are ready to begin the performance period and initiate payments to the ESCO.

149

ENERGY COMMISSION PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Prosper, California Public Utilities Commission, 415.703.2160 GREENHOUSE GAS STRATEGIES OPINION RELEASED SACRAMENTO -- The California Energy Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission today released

150

Review of the International Atomic Energy Agency International database on reactor pressure vessel materials and US Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Oak Ridge National Laboratory embrittlement data base  

SciTech Connect

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has supported neutron radiation effects information exchange through meetings and conferences since the mid-1960s. Through an International Working Group on Reliability of Reactor Pressure Components, information exchange and research activities were fostered through the Coordinated Research Program (CRP) sponsored by the IAEA. The final CRP meeting was held in November 1993, where it was recommended that the IAEA coordinate the development of an International Database on Reactor Pressure Vessel Material (IDRPVM) as the first step in generating an International Database on Aging Management. The purpose of this study was to provide special technical assistance to the NRC in monitoring and evaluating the IAEA activities in developing the IAEA IDRPVM, and to compare the IDRPVM with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) - Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Power Reactor Embrittlement Data Base (PR-EDB) and provide recommendations for improving the PR-EDB. A first test version of the IDRPVM was distributed at the First Meeting of Liaison Officers to the IAEA IDRPVM, in November 1996. No power reactor surveillance data were included in this version; the testing data were mainly from CRP Phase III data. Therefore, because of insufficient data and a lack of power reactor surveillance data received from the IAEA IDRPVM, the comparison is made based only on the structure of the IDRPVM. In general, the IDRPVM and the EDB have very similar data structure and data format. One anticipates that because the IDRPVM data will be collected from so many different sources, quality assurance of the data will be a difficult task. The consistency of experimental test results will be an important issue. A very wide spectrum of material characteristics of RPV steels and irradiation environments exists among the various countries. Hence the development of embrittlement prediction models will be a formidable task. 4 refs., 2 figs., 4 tabs.

Wang, J.A.; Kam, F.B.K.

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

151

Monitoring Based Commissioning: Benchmarking Analysis of 24 UC/CSU/IOU Projects  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Targeting projects to high-EUI sites is a reliable way toof MBCx and Meta-analysis in terms of preCx EUI, pre-Cx electrical EUI, energy savings, and electricity savings

Mills, Evan

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

Commissioning Team | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Commissioning Team Commissioning Team Commissioning Team October 16, 2013 - 4:45pm Addthis Assembling a committed team is a critical part of the commissioning process for renewable energy projects. Members of the team vary based on the size, complexity, and funding mechanism used for the project at hand. The commissioning team lead is a commissioning agent, an independent agent representing the agency's interests. In addition to the commissioning agent, participants in the commissioning process can include the agency, operations and management (O&M) personnel, contractors, subcontractors, and the architectural and engineering (A&E) firm. The project energy lead should also be an active member of the commissioning team and work closely with the commissioning agent. Renewable energy projects often require a team of experts in specific

153

* Milepost Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy Savers (EERE)

using the eLibrary link. Click on the eLibrary link, click on "General Search," and enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e.,...

154

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Requirements Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE requirements definition is to assess the activities that results in the specification, documentation, and review of the requirements that the software product must satisfy, including functionality, performance, design constraints, attributes and external interfaces. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production. IV&V reviewed the requirements specified in the NRC Form 189s to verify these requirements were included in SAPHIREs Software Verification and Validation Plan (SVVP).

Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 System Test Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE System Test Plan is to assess the approach to be taken for intended testing activities associated with the SAPHIRE software product. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production.

Kent Norris

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

156

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Requirements Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE requirements definition is to assess the activities that results in the specification, documentation, and review of the requirements that the software product must satisfy, including functionality, performance, design constraints, attributes and external interfaces. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production. IV&V reviewed the requirements specified in the NRC Form 189s to verify these requirements were included in SAPHIREs Software Verification and Validation Plan (SVVP).

Kent Norris

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

Independent Verification and Validation SAPHIRE Version 8 Final Report Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

This report provides an evaluation of the SAPHIRE version 8 software product. SAPHIRE version 8 is being developed with a phased or cyclic iterative rapid application development methodology. Due to this approach, a similar approach has been taken for the IV&V activities on each vital software object. IV&V and Software Quality Assurance (SQA) activities occur throughout the entire development life cycle and therefore, will be required through the full development of SAPHIRE version 8. Later phases of the software life cycle, the operation and maintenance phases, are not applicable in this effort since the IV&V is being done prior to releasing Version 8.

Kent Norris

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

California Energy Commission PROPOSED AMENDED STANDARDS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission PROPOSED AMENDED STANDARDS NONRESIDENTIAL ACCEPTANCE TESTING ENERGY COMMISSION Martha Brook Project Manager & Principal Author Eurlyne Geiszler Staff members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily

159

California Energy Commission SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor MAY 2012 CEC4002012002SP #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Joe Loyer Primary Author Maziar Shirakh, P.E. Project Manager

160

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT REPORT RENEWABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD 20082010 ENERGY COMMISSION Gina Barkalow Theresa Daniels James Haile Primary Authors Gina Barkalow Project Manager with contributions from the following: California Energy Commission Gabe Herrera Mark Kootstra Michael Nyberg

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

USPS mailing and shipping prices increase effective January 26, 2014 The Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) approved the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Rate Case for  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

USPS mailing and shipping prices increase effective January 26, 2014 The Postal Regulatory, the PRC approved the Exigency case by an additional 4.3% for a total increase of 5.9% and will take effect

Hemmers, Oliver

162

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT STATUS OF THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT5002010037 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Leah Mohney Primary Author Project Manager Steve Williams Senior was prepared by staff of the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views

163

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS MARCH 2012 CEC-400-2010-004-SD3, Article 9, Sections 1680 1685 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Martha Brook Program Senior Mechanical Engineer Justin Regnier Project Manager

164

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Jay Morrison Jay Morrison Vice President, Regulatory Issues National Rural Electric Cooperative Association jay.morrison@nreca.coop Susan Kelly General Counsel, Senior Vice President American Public Power Association skelly@publicpower.org  DG penetration rates are increasing rapidly  Careful selection of business model can maximize value for all participants by:  Maximizing access to government incentives  Maximize access to all available value streams for the developer, customer, and utility  Minimize regulatory burdens for all parties  Provide win-win-win solution 2  What size generator?  What fuel or energy source? Does it include storage?  Who pays the up-front cost of the generator?  Who owns the generator?  Who operates the generator?

165

ENERGY STAR Guide to Retro-Commissioning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

ENERGY STAR Guide to Retro-Commissioning gives an overview of RCx and provides detailed project guidance.

166

Continuous Commissioning  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Continuous Commissioning? for Existing Buildings D. E. Claridge, P.E., Ph.D., FASHRAE Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering Director, Energy Systems Laboratory Continuous Commissioning? and CC? are registered trademarks of the Texas... Commissioning Building Has ? Satisfied Occupants ? Comfortable Conditions ? Operational Issues Resolved ? Operating Staff Trained ? Reduced Operating Cost ? Saving from 10% to 20%+ over baseline total cost ? ROI of 40%+ ? Breakeven investment...

Culp, C.; Claridge, D. E.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

ENERGY COMMISSION Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Valley (Solar Two) Energy Project AFC Committee as part of Imperial Valley (Solar Two) Energy Project Member RAOUL RENAUD Hearing Officer This report was prepared by the California Energy Commission Imperial

168

Chapter 29 - Portfolio and Project Planning and Management in the Drug Discovery, Evaluation, Development, and Regulatory Review Process  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Drug discovery, evaluation, development, and regulatory review are complex, lengthy, and costly processes that involve in excess of 10,000 interdependent activities. In order to be successful in biopharmaceutical new product development, one needs a set of general principles that provide guidance in the construction of a Research and Development (R&D) Portfolio, the construction of individual Product Development Plans, and the subsequent updates required to keep the portfolio and product development plans current as learning occurs. The following five Principles of Optimal Product Development form the basis for defining a decision-based operational model, identifying and quantifying the critical information required at each major decision-point, projecting the probabilities of various outcomes, and informing key stakeholders (management, board, and investors) with the clear and concise status information that is needed for effective product development governance.

Charles Grudzinskas; Charles T. Gombar

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

169

The rate schedule below was approved on a final basis by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on March 17, 2000, for the p  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 United States Department of Energy Southeastern Power Administration Wholesale Power Rate Schedule CM-1-H Availability: This rate schedule shall be available to the South Mississippi Electric Power Association, Municipal Energy Agency of Mississippi, and Mississippi Delta Energy Agency (hereinafter called the Customers). Applicability: This rate schedule shall be applicable to electric capacity and energy available from the Dale Hollow, Center Hill, Wolf Creek, Cheatham, Old Hickory, Barkley, J. Percy Priest, and Cordell Hull Projects (all of such projects being hereinafter called collectively the "Cumberland Projects") and sold in wholesale quantities. Character of Service: The electric capacity and energy supplied hereunder will be three-phase alternating

170

California Commissioning Collaborative: 2007 Program Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Commissioning Collaborative: 2007 Program Plan Presented by: Jim Parks, Chair CCC Board of Directors November 1, 2007 California Commissioning Collaborative California Commissioning Collaborative Mission and Organization Improve... and RCx as a strategy for meeting efficiency goals CCC projects provide support and resources California Commissioning Collaborative 2007 Program Plan Support for Retrocommissioning Programs Verification of Savings Retrocommissioning Market...

Parks, J.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT 05602  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on a recent RAP paper: What Lies Beyond Capacity Markets? for the Pacific Northwest Demand Response Project at operational scale 3 #12;Capacity markets: The temptation of the familiar Capacity markets: investment one problem can create others Capacity markets can work at cross purposes with a market that needs

172

Public Service Commission and Natural Gas Safety Standards (Missouri)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This legislation establishes the state Public Service Commission, which has regulatory authority over the electric, gas, water, and telecommunications utilities. Section 386.572 of this legislation...

173

Microsoft Word - P-12711 Cobscook Bay Project EA.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER PROJECT PILOT LICENSE Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Project-FERC Project No. 12711-005 (DOE/EA1916) Maine Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401 January 2012 i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................

174

Commissioning Process | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Commissioning Process Commissioning Process Commissioning Process October 7, 2013 - 9:19am Addthis The commissioning process for Federal facilities generally follows a four-step process. This process holds true across all forms of commissioning and for both new and existing buildings. Step 1: Planning The planning step includes developing and agreeing upon the overall commissioning objectives and strategies, assembling the project team, and compiling and perusing building and equipment documentation. Objectives for this step include: Optimizing building operations to reduce operating costs Addressing complaints from occupants regarding air quality or comforts Creating a model facility Improving facility operations and maintenance (O&M) and reducing emergency calls. When forming the commissioning team, considerations could include

175

Development of an Energy Conservation Voluntary Agreement, Pilot Project in the Steel Sector in Shandong Province. Project Report to the State Economic and Trade Commission, People's Republic of China  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

features in selected trade magazines, energy conferences andEconomic and Trade Commission Nanyang Energy Conservationcompany Energy service company Economic and Trade Commission

Price, Lynn; Yun, Jiang; Worrell, Ernst; Wenwei, Du; Sinton, Jonathan E.

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

Commissioning Guidance for ESPCs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7.2 7.2 Commissioning Guide Commissioning Guidance for ESPCs INTRODUCTION Federal facility managers are challenged daily with maintaining existing federal building stock that is energy inefficient, requires increasing operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses, and often does not achieve the building occupant comfort needed to maintain worker productivity. Additionally, they are faced with congressionally mandated requirements to reduce energy use and O&M expenses, with little capital funding. The Super ESPC program provides a procurement mechanism to allow agencies to acquire performance-based services to implement energy efficient equipment and systems that reduce energy use and O&M expenses through projects designed, installed, financed, and

177

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Guide describes building commissioning, recommissioning, retrocommissioning, and continuous commissioning for federal facilities.

178

Quarterly project status report, October-December 1981. [Implementation of PURPA by state regulatory authorities and nonregulated utilities  

SciTech Connect

Economic Regulatory Administration (ERA) has a requirement to report to Congress on determinations made by State regulatory authorities and nonregulated utilities regarding their purposes of Title I and III of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, (PURPA) of 1978. The purposes stated in PURPA are to promote conservation of energy supplied by utilities, efficiency in use of utilities, and equitable rates for utility consumers. ERA is also required to assist State regulatory authorities and nonregulated utilities in carrying out their PURPA responsibilities by implementing information dissemination activities. This report summarizes contractual support to ERA in implementing its information data base to its clientele. Progress is reported on: information acquisition/dissemination; information analysis and retrieval; information storage, and information maintenance. (MCW)

Not Available

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGION I REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 194061415 Docket No. 040-07123 JUL. 19 '996 License No. SUB-748 (Retired) United States -Department of Energy O ffice of EnvironmentalRestoration ATTN: W. Alexander Williams, Ph.D. EM-241 Cloverleaf Building 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, Maryland 20874-1290 SUBJECT: NL INDUSTRIES, ALBANY, NEW YORK Dear Dr. Williams: We are aware that DOE is responsible for the former National Lead Company (NL Industries) facility near Albany, New York. During a recent review of retired AEC License No. SUB-748, we found records which provide additional information concerning the use of source material at the facility. Copies of AEC documents which describe activities at that facility are enclosed. License No. SUB-00748 authorized possession of 38,000 pounds of uranium during

180

Sandia National Laboratories: Federal Electric Regulatory Commission  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

News, News & Events, Partnership, Photovoltaic, Renewable Energy, SMART Grid, Solar, SunShot, Systems Analysis After two years of industry consultation, the Federal Electric...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Sandia National Laboratories: Federal Electric Regulatory Commission...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

News, News & Events, Partnership, Photovoltaic, Renewable Energy, SMART Grid, Solar, SunShot, Systems Analysis After two years of industry consultation, the Federal Electric...

182

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Safeguards Information for Contention Preparation on a Combined

Laughlin, Robert B.

183

California Energy Commission COMMISSION REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

emissions, reduce petroleum use, improve air quality, and stimulate the sustainable production and use measurable transition from the nearly exclusive use of petroleum fuels to a diverse portfolio of alternative fuels that meet petroleum reduction goals and alternative fuel use goals." The Energy Commission has

184

California Energy Commission COMMISSION REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

petroleum use, improve air quality, and stimulate the sustainable production and use of biofuels within measurable transition from the nearly exclusive use of petroleum fuels to a diverse portfolio of alternative fuels that meet petroleum reduction goals and alternative fuel use goals." The Energy Commission has

185

The fast-spectrum transmutation experimental facility FASTEF: Main design achievements (Part 1: Core and primary system) within the FP7-CDT collaborative project of the European Commission  

SciTech Connect

MYRRHA (Multi-purpose hybrid Research Reactor for High-tech Applications) is the flexible experimental accelerator-driven system (ADS) in development at SCK CEN in replacement of its material testing reactor BR2. SCK CEN in association with 17 European partners from industry, research centres and academia, responded to the FP7 (Seventh Framework Programme) call from the European Commission to establish a Central Design Team (CDT) for the design of a Fast Spectrum Transmutation Experimental Facility (FASTEF) able to demonstrate efficient transmutation and associated technology through a system working in subcritical and/or critical mode. The project has started on April 01, 2009 for a period of three years. In this paper, we present the latest configuration of the reactor core and primary system. The FASTEF facility has evolved quite a lot since the intermediate reporting done at the ICAPP'10 and ICAPP'11 conferences 1 2. If it remains a small-scale facility, the core power amounts now up to 100 MWth in critical mode. In a companion paper 3, we present the concept of the reactor building and the plant layout. (authors)

De Bruyn, D.; Fernandez, R. [Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol (Belgium); Mansani, L. [ANSALDO, Corso Perrone 25, 16152 Genova (Italy); Woaye-Hune, A. [AREVA-NP, rue Juliette Recamier 10, 69456 Lyon Cedex 06 (France); Sarotto, M. [ENEA, Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129 Bologna (Italy); Bubelis, E. [KIT, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen (Germany)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

European Commission  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

European Commission European Commission Directorate-General for Energy & Transport Ministry of Industry an Energy of the State of Qatar Gulf Co-operation Council Secretariat General EU-GCC Seminar: "Natural Gas Technologies - Realities & Prospects" Doha, Qatar, 7-8 February 2005 STREAM B: "Advanced Technologies for Power Generation through Natural Gas & Desalination" SESSION B.3: STATE OF THE ART OF COMBINED CYCLE PLANT Michael VOLLMER, Head of Combined Cycle Power Plant Development, ALSTOM Power Turbo-Systems February 2005 February 2005 Power Turbo-Systems State Of The Art Combined Cycle Power Plants Michael Vollmer 2 ALSTOM (Switzerland)Ltd© 2005. Preliminary/for discussion purposes only. We reserve all rights in this document and in the information

187

Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project Plan  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this document is to describe the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project (YMP) and establish an approved YMP baseline against which overall YMP progress and management effectiveness shall be measured. For the sake of brevity, this document will be referred to as the Project Plan throughout this document. This Project Plan only addresses activities up to the submittal of the repository license application (LA) to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). A new Project Plan will be submitted to establish the technical, cost, and schedule baselines for the final design and construction phase of development extending through the start of repository operations, assuming that the site is determined to be suitable.

Gertz, C.P.; Bartlett, J.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER PILOT PROJECT LICENSE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FOR HYDROPOWER PILOT PROJECT LICENSE Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project-FERC Project No. 12690-005 (DOE/EA-1949) Washington Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401 January 15, 2013 20130115-3035 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 01/15/2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................

189

Utah Labor Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Labor Commission Labor Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name Utah Labor Commission Address 160 East 300 South, 3rd Floor Place Salt Lake City, Utah Zip 84114-6600 Phone number (801) 530-6800 Website http://laborcommission.utah.go References Website[1] This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Utah Labor Commission is an organization based in Salt Lake City, Utah. The Utah Labor Commission is the regulatory agency responsible for preserving the balance established by the legislature for protecting the health, safety, and economic well-being of employees and employers. It is a multi-division state agency directed by a Commissioner who is appointed by the Governor. The Commissioner oversees the various functions of the divisions within the Commission.

190

Design considerations for the Yucca Mountain project exploratory shaft facility  

SciTech Connect

This paper reports on the regulatory/requirements challenges of this project which exist because this is the first facility of its kind to ever be planned, characterized, designed, and built under the purview of a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency. The regulations and requirements that flow down to the Architect/Engineer (A/E) for development of the Exploratory Shaft Facility (ESF) design are voluminous and unique to this project. The subsurface design and construction of the ESF underground facility may eventually become a part of the future repository facility and, if so, will require licensing by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The Fenix and Scisson of Nevada-Yucca Mountain Project (FSN-YMP) group believes that all of the UMP design and construction related activities, with good design/construct control, can be performed to meet all engineering requirements, while following a strict quality assurance program that will also meet regulatory requirements.

Bullock, R.L. Sr. [Fenix and Scisson of Nevada, NV (US)

1990-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

191

Project Sponsors: California Energy Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Generation: H2 from Natural Gas (SMR) H2 from Petroleum Coke H2 from Coal with Carbon Capture H2 from from Natural Gas (SMR) H2 from Petroleum Coke H2 from Coal with Carbon Capture H2 from Renewable

Mease, Kenneth D.

192

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Configuration Management Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE configuration management is to assess the activities that results in the process of identifying and defining the baselines associated with the SAPHIRE software product; controlling the changes to baselines and release of baselines throughout the life cycle; recording and reporting the status of baselines and the proposed and actual changes to the baselines; and verifying the correctness and completeness of baselines.. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production.

Kent Norris

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Configuration Management Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE configuration management is to assess the activities that results in the process of identifying and defining the baselines associated with the SAPHIRE software product; controlling the changes to baselines and release of baselines throughout the life cycle; recording and reporting the status of baselines and the proposed and actual changes to the baselines; and verifying the correctness and completeness of baselines.. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production.

Kent Norris

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Design and Interface Design Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE software design and interface design is to assess the activities that results in the development, documentation, and review of a software design that meets the requirements defined in the software requirements documentation. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production. IV&V reviewed the requirements specified in the NRC Form 189s to verify these requirements were included in SAPHIREs Software Verification and Validation Plan (SVVP) design specification.

Kent Norris

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Design and Interface Design Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE software design and interface design is to assess the activities that results in the development, documentation, and review of a software design that meets the requirements defined in the software requirements documentation. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production. IV&V reviewed the requirements specified in the NRC Form 189s to verify these requirements were included in SAPHIREs Software Verification and Validation Plan (SVVP) design specification.

Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

196

Independent Verification and Validation Of SAPHIRE 8 Software Acceptance Test Plan Project Number: N6423 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) role in the evaluation of the SAPHIRE 8 Software Acceptance Test Plan is to assess the approach to be taken for intended testing activities. The plan typically identifies the items to be tested, the requirements being tested, the testing to be performed, test schedules, personnel requirements, reporting requirements, evaluation criteria, and any risks requiring contingency planning. The IV&V team began this endeavor after the software engineering and software development of SAPHIRE had already been in production.

Kent Norris

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

197

EA-1949: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA analyzes the potential environmental effects of a proposal by the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snowhomish County, Washington to construct and operate the Admiralty Inlet Tidal Project. The proposed 680-kilowatt project would be located on the east side of Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, Washington, about 1 kilometer west of Whidbey Island, entirely within Island County, Washington. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the lead agency. DOE is a cooperating agency.

198

E-Print Network 3.0 - armed forces commission Sample Search Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

is not just about power plants. Nuclear engineers design, build and Summary: of Energy, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, etc.); nuclear utilities; reactor and nuclear fuel...

199

EIS-0153: Niagara Import Point Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission prepared this statement to assess the environmental impacts of the proposed Niagara Import Point project that would construct an interstate natural gas pipeline to transport gas from Canada and domestic sources to the Northeastern United States market. The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy was a cooperating agency during statement development and adopted this statement on 6/15/1990.

200

Commissioning Plan RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Checkout, Testing, and Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O Ch 0 OFFICE OF heckout, T C CD-1 F ENVIRON Standard R Testing, a Revi Critical Decis CD-2 Ma NMENTAL Review Plan and Com iew Module sion (CD) Ap CD arch 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) mmissioni e pplicability D-3 EMENT ing Plan CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-1189-2008,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan RM | Department of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan RM Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan RM The CP RM Module is a tool that assists DOE federal project review teams in evaluating the...

202

Energy Department Develops Regulatory Roadmap to Spur Geothermal Energy Development  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Energy Department today issued a Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap that will help developers navigate regulatory requirements at every level of government to deploy geothermal energy projects.

203

TIES Project is co-financed by the European Commission on the framework of the TEMPUS Programme. Contract: 159218-TEMPUS-1-2009-1-ES-TEMPUS-JPGR  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) Implementing · 4) Evaluating · THINK · PLAN · DO · REVIEW #12;TIES Project is co-financed by the European? · Standard project management and development approach · Used in most project organisations (World Bank, EC

204

California Energy Commission's AB 118 Implementation Timeline  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

* Assumes that public comment/Commission review will not result in changes to regulatory language that would Investment Plan August 26, 2008 Post AB 118 Implementation Timeline for September 2, 2008, Staff Workshop with Advisory Committee Members September 9, 2008 Committee Workshop to Review Revised Draft Regulation Language

205

River Basin Commissions (Indiana)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This legislation establishes river basin commissions, for the Kankakee, Maumee, St. Joseph, and Upper Wabash Rivers. The commissions facilitate and foster cooperative planning and coordinated...

206

Types of Commissioning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Several commissioning types exist to address the specific needs of equipment and systems across both new and existing buildings. The following commissioning types provide a good overview.

207

Scheduling the Remediation of Port Hope: Logistical and Regulatory Challenges of a Multiple Site Urban Remediation Project - 13119  

SciTech Connect

The Port Hope Project is part of the larger CAN$1.28 billion Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI), a community-based program for the development and implementation of a safe, local, long-term management solution for historic Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) in the Municipalities of Port Hope and Clarington, Ontario, Canada. Atomic Energy of Canada (AECL) is the Project Proponent, Public Works and Government Services (PWGSC) is managing the procurement of services and the MMM Group Limited - Conestoga Rovers and Associates Joint Venture (MMM-CRA Joint Venture) is providing detailed design and construction oversight and administration services for the Project. The Port Hope Project includes the construction of a long-term waste management facility (LTWMF) in the Municipality of Port Hope and the remediation of 18 (eighteen) large-scale LLRW, numerous small-scale sites still being identified and industrial sites within the Municipality. The total volume to be remediated is over one million cubic metres and will come from sites that include temporary storage sites, ravines, beaches, parks, private commercial and residential properties and vacant industrial sites all within the urban area of Port Hope. Challenges that will need to be overcome during this 10 year project include: - Requirements stipulated by the Environmental Assessment (EA) that affect Project logistics and schedule. - Coordination of site remediation with the construction schedule at the LTWMF. - Physical constraints on transport routes and at sites affecting production rates. - Despite being an urban undertaking, seasonal constrains for birds and fish (i.e., nesting and spawning seasons). - Municipal considerations. - Site-specific constraints. - Site interdependencies exist requiring consideration in the schedule. Several sites require the use of an adjacent site for staging. (authors)

Ferguson Jones, Andrea; Lee, Angela [MMM Group Limited, 100 Commerce Valley Drive West, Thornhill, Ontario, L3T 0A1 (Canada)] [MMM Group Limited, 100 Commerce Valley Drive West, Thornhill, Ontario, L3T 0A1 (Canada); Palmeter, Tim [Public Works and Government Services Canada, 4900 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2N 6A6 (Canada)] [Public Works and Government Services Canada, 4900 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2N 6A6 (Canada)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

California Energy Commission GUIDANCE ON WASTE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission GUIDANCE GUIDANCE ON WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY) obtain waste management plans for each proposed project receiving funding under the Energy Efficiency of waste. The Energy Commission is providing the following guidance to assist recipients of EECBG Program

209

Nuclear regulatory legislation, 104th Congress. Volume 2, No. 4  

SciTech Connect

This document is the second of two volumes compiling statutes and material pertaining to nuclear regulatory legislation through the 104th Congress, 2nd Session. It is intended for use as a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) internal resource document. Legislative information reproduced in this document includes portions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, various acts pertaining to low-level radioactive waste, the Clean Air Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, the West Valley Demonstration Project Act, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Export Licensing Statutes, and selected treaties, agreements, and executive orders. Other information provided pertains to Commissioner tenure, NRC appropriations, the Chief Financial Officers Act, information technology management reform, and Federal civil penalties.

NONE

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

EIS-0491: Lake Charles Liquefaction Project, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

91: Lake Charles Liquefaction Project, Calcasieu Parish, 91: Lake Charles Liquefaction Project, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana EIS-0491: Lake Charles Liquefaction Project, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana SUMMARY The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing, with DOE as a cooperating agency, an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to expand an existing liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, by constructing and operating natural gas liquefaction and exportation capabilities. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 28, 2013 EIS-0491: Supplemental Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Lake Charles Liquefaction Project, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana September 25, 2012

211

A Practical Guide for Commissioning Existing Buildings  

SciTech Connect

Although this guide focuses on the retrocommissioning process and its advantages, all three types of commissioning--retrocommissioning, commissioning, and recommissioning--play an equally important role in ensuring that buildings perform efficiently and provide comfortable, safe, and productive work environments for owners and occupants. For new construction and retrofit projects, commissioning should be incorporated early, during design, and last throughout the length of the project. For buildings that were never commissioned, the retrocommissioning process can yield a wealth of cost-saving opportunities while enhancing a building's environment. Finally, once a building is commissioned or retrocommissioned, incorporating recommissioning into the organization's O and M program (by periodically reapplying the original diagnostic testing and checklist procedures) helps ensure that cost savings and other benefits gained from the original process persist over time.

Haasl, T.; Sharp, T.

1999-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

Energy/Environment/Commissioning  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

//NESTECNESTEC Nobuo NakaharaNobuo Nakahara ICEBO/APCBCAsia Pacific Conference on Building Commissioning 2006.11.7 Opening AddressOpening AddressEnergy/Environment/CommissioningEnergy/Environment/Commissioning Call for Call... Commissioning PrincipleCommissioning Principle Evaluation PrincipleEvaluation Principle How Building & Urban Energy System How Building & Urban Energy System shall be completed and maintained?shall be completed and maintained? Mechanism of Urban Environment...

Nakahara, N.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

Including Retro-Commissioning in Federal Energy Savings Performance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in Federal Energy Savings Performance Contracts Example Retro-Commissioning Statement of Work Introduction to Measurement & Verification for DOE Super ESPC Projects...

214

Commissioning and Retro-Commissioning Resources  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

To ensure a new building's systems are correctly installed and are operating properly, a commissioning program may be incorporated into all building phases, including design, construction, and operations.

215

The Paradox of Regulatory Development in China: The Case of the Electricity Industry  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

zhongguo dianli chanye (Chinas Electricity Industry at themulti_page.pdf. State Electricity Regulatory Commission.The Annual Report on Electricity Regulation (2006). Beijing:

Tsai, Chung-min

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

Regulatory and technical reports (abstract index journal): Annual compilation for 1996, Volume 21, No. 4  

SciTech Connect

This compilation is the annual cumulation of bibliographic data and abstracts for the formal regulatory and technical reports issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff and its contractors.

Sheehan, M.A.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCE UTILITY INTERFACE Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared: California Energy Commission Bernard Treanton Project Manager Mike Gravely Office Manager Energy Systems Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees

218

Regulatory Highlights  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

It also described plans relating to the need to remove reference to wet chemical tests for heavy metals from all individual monographs. ... This was reviewed in detail in the previous regulatory review. ... A concept paper and business plan have been developed for an ICH guideline focused on technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle management. ...

Andrew Teasdale

2014-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

219

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW Regulatory Amendment for a Catch Sharing Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW Regulatory Amendment for a Catch Sharing Plan For the Pacific Halibut and 3A Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Date Charter and Commercial Longline Sectors in International Pacific Halibut Commission Regulatory Areas 2C

220

California Energy Commission GUIDELINES  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Utilities Commission, CPUC, solar, solar energy systems, solar energy system incentive programsCalifornia Energy Commission GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR CALIFORNIA'S SOLAR guidelines for solar energy system incentive programs in California. The Senate Bill 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

NETL: News Release - DOE-Funded Project Honored with Environmental  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

16 , 2006 16 , 2006 DOE-Funded Project Honored with Environmental Stewardship Award Project Developed Low-Cost Methods, Tools to Remediate Old, Orphaned Oil Sites WASHINGTON, DC - A U.S. Department of Energy-funded project has been honored with a major national award for superior environmental stewardship related to oil and natural gas operations. The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC), the leading authority on State oil and gas regulatory programs, gave its Environmental Partnership Award to the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC), ALL Consulting LLC, of Tulsa, Okla., and DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory. The annual award recognizes innovative projects that highlight environmental care in oil and gas operations and are led by non-industry organizations with the cooperation and participation of the petroleum industry. The Environmental Partnership Award is one of the IOGCC's four Chairman's Stewardship Awards, which recognize organizations that have demonstrated a voluntary commitment to excellence in the areas of environmental stewardship and energy education.

222

Building commissioning: The key to quality assurance  

SciTech Connect

This Guide is written to aid building owners and retrofit project managers currently participating in the Rebuild America program. The Guide provides information on implementing building commissioning projects that will optimize the results of existing building equipment improvements and retrofits projects. It should be used in coordination with Rebuild America`s Community Partnership Handbook. The Handbook describes, in detail, eight important steps necessary for planning and carrying out a community-wide energy-efficiency program. In step number 7 of the Handbook, commissioning is shown to be an integral aspect of implementing a building retrofit. The commissioning process ensures that a facility is safe, efficient, comfortable, and conducive to the presumed activities for which it was constructed. Rebuild America strongly encourages its partners to incorporate commissioning into their retrofit projects. By verifying the correct installation, functioning, operation, and maintenance of equipment, the commissioning process ensures that efficiency measures will continue to deliver benefits over the long term. Although commissioning can take place after the equipment has been installed, it is more effective when it takes place over the entire equipment installation process.

NONE

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

223

Active NEPA Projects | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Active NEPA Projects Active NEPA Projects Active NEPA Projects List of Active NEPA Projects EIS-0497: CE FLNG Project, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing, with DOE as a cooperating agency, an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas terminal in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, and approximately 37 miles of 42-inch diameter natural gas transmission pipeline to connect the terminal to natural gas infrastructure facilities. Last Update: January 8, 2014 EIS-0495: Walla Walla Basin Spring Chinook Hatchery Program; Milton-Freewater, Oregon, and Dayton, Washington Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is preparing an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of funding a proposal by the Confederated

224

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor MARCH 2013 CEC5002013014 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily

225

Lessons Learned... and Not Learned: A Case Study in Regulatory Evolution  

SciTech Connect

'Are you better off than you were four years ago?' 'You've come a long way, baby.' Eschewing politics and advertising, these idioms are applied to the evolution of regulatory processes for Decontamination and Decommissioning (D and D) of nuclear facilities. We use a case study of a (nearly) completed D and D project at a large nuclear fuel manufacturing facility, to chronicle one licensee's experience with US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) D and D regulations from the 1990's to the present. Historical milestones include the birth of a D and D project, a false start and resultant consequences, a D and D 'moratorium' with subsequent planning and stakeholder integration, a second start which included the challenge of parallel path D and D physical work and regulatory processes, and the 'lessons learned' contributions to timely project progress. Further discussion includes a look at the 'declaration of victory' and examines what it really means to be finished. The rich contextual experience from the case study and the observations of other industry members provides the basis for answers to several key questions: How far has the regulatory process for D and D really evolved, and in what direction? Are licensees generally satisfied or dissatisfied with the methods? What has not improved? Which improvements looked promising, but languished in recent years? How far have we really come and are we better off? What are the opportunities for further improvement? The summary answer to each question, using compendious engineering terms is... 'it depends'. (authors)

Conant, J. F. [ABB Inc., 2000 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT 06095 (United States); Woodard, R. C. [TLG Services/Entergy, 148 New Milford Road East, Bridgewater, CT 06752 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

Retro-Commissioning (RCx)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Retro-Commissioning Retro-Commissioning (RCx) FUPWG Meeting 20 October, 2010 RCx In UESC Contracts  Put RCx in Delivery Orders  Clear Scope of Work  Specify kW per Ton on Completion  State the Current Condition of the Equipment  State the Expected Performance in the Delivery Orders and Get the Contractor to Agree Up-Front  Don't Hire a Contractor that has Never Done Commissioning  Hire a Commissioning Agent  This Can Be Expensive What We Do at SCE  We Commission Everything  We ReCommission Everything to Some Degree  San Bernardino Story Up Front  You must review and approve the construction scope, budget, and schedule including all RCx activities BEFORE work begins at site  Use Pre-Established Guidelines (FEMP

227

A study of the future water requirements of the state of Texas and the projected plan to meet them as presented by the United States Study Commission - Texas  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that my education could be continued. G. W. August, 1963 111 CONTENTS Page List of Tables List of Plates Chapter vi I. Introduction II. Water Resources I II. Water Requirements IV. The Water Development Plan 15 31 34 V. Views and Comments... University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Sanuary, 1964 Major Subject Business Adzninistration A STUDY OF THE FUTURE WATER REQUIREMENTS. OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE PROJECTED PLAN TO MEET...

Wortham, Gene Rye

1964-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Regulatory Tools  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Tools Regulatory Tools Home CRA - 2004 Final Recertification Decision CRA Comments & Responses CCA - 1996 CRA CARDs & TSDs CCA CARDs & TSDs Regulatory Tools Title 40 CFR Part 191 Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes. Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Re-Certification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the 40 CFR Part 191 Disposal Regulations. Part I Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the Disposal Regulations; Alternative Provisions; Proposed Rule. Friday August 9, 2002. Part II Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the Disposal Regulations: Certification Decision; Final Rule. May 18, 1998. Part III

229

Retro-Commissioning (RCx)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation covers retro-commissioning (RCx) and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Rapid City, South Dakota.

230

California Energy Commission  

Energy Savers (EERE)

California Energy Commission Quadrennial Water Review Comments - June 19, 2014 Water-Energy Nexus Water and energy systems are inextricably linked -- producing energy uses large...

231

Technical Assistance Project (TAP) Revolving Loan Funds: Basics...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(cont.) Eligible Retrofit Projects (cont.) Building Shell Improvements (insulation, window film) Water Conservation Projects Systems Commissioning Three types of...

232

Sensor Suitcase for Small Commercial Building Retro-Commissioning Research  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sensor Suitcase for Small Commercial Sensor Suitcase for Small Commercial Building Retro-Commissioning Research Project Sensor Suitcase for Small Commercial Building Retro-Commissioning Research Project The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently conducting research into sensor systems for small commercial buildings. The proposed system will streamline the processes of collecting data from these buildings and processing the data to obtain highly targeted retro-commissioning (RCx) actions customized for each building. Project Description This project seeks to develop a sensor and analysis system to support monitor-based retro-commissioning of small commercial buildings. Basing commissioning on actual measurements of conditions and system performance in these buildings is challenging because small commercial buildings

233

Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework DOE's Nuclear Safety Enabling Legislation Regulatory Enforcement & Oversight Regulatory Governance Atomic Energy Act 1946...

234

Low Dose Radiation Program: Links - Agencies with Radiation Regulatory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Agencies with Radiation Regulatory Concerns and Involvement Agencies with Radiation Regulatory Concerns and Involvement Biological Effects of Low Level Exposures (BELLE) Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Center for Risk Excellence Health Protection Agency The Health Risks of Extraterrestrial Environments International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Inc. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA) NASA Space Radiation Program National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA OBRR Task Book Publication National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) National Toxicology Program (NTP) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

235

European Commission Agriculture and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development Good practice guidance on the sustainable Commission (EC) DG Agriculture and Rural Development 130, Rue de la Loi B ­ 1049 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 (0) 2-2969909 Fax: +32 (0) 2-29211 33 E-mail: info@ec.europa.eu Web: https://www.ec.europa.eu/agriculture

236

EA-1971: Golden Pass LNG Export and Pipeline Project, Texas and Louisiana  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), with DOE as a cooperating agency, announced its intent to prepare an EA to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate natural gas liquefaction and export facilities at the existing Golden Pass liquefied natural gas terminal in Jefferson County, Texas. In June 2014, FERC announced that due to changes in the project location and scope, it would prepare an EIS. See DOE/EIS-0501.

237

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Introduction Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Introduction B uilding commissioning has often been likened to commissioning of a ship, where the Owners thor- oughly verify and prove the func- tional performance of all parts - engines, compasses, sonar, radar, radio, generators, potable water systems, and so on - under all pos- sible conditions and as a condition of acceptance before placing the ship in service. And where the Owner checks the presence of sys- tem operating and procedures manuals and the availability of up- to-date navigation charts. And where the crew has been properly and thoroughly trained on the ship's systems' operations and emergency procedures. Commissioning is not new - ships and aircraft have been commissioned for years. Building commissioning has

238

Commissioning for Federal Facilities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Introduction Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Introduction B uilding commissioning has often been likened to commissioning of a ship, where the Owners thor- oughly verify and prove the func- tional performance of all parts - engines, compasses, sonar, radar, radio, generators, potable water systems, and so on - under all pos- sible conditions and as a condition of acceptance before placing the ship in service. And where the Owner checks the presence of sys- tem operating and procedures manuals and the availability of up- to-date navigation charts. And where the crew has been properly and thoroughly trained on the ship's systems' operations and emergency procedures. Commissioning is not new - ships and aircraft have been commissioned for years. Building commissioning has

239

Commission | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

57 57 Varnish cache server Commission Dataset Summary Description This dataset contains oil and gas drilling and permit records for February 2011. State oil and gas boards and commissions make oil and gas data and information open to the public. To view the full range of data contained at the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, visit http://doa.alaska.gov/ogc/ Source Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Date Released February 28th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords Alaska Commission gas oil Well record Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon http://doa.alaska.gov/ogc/drilling/dindex.html (xls, 34.3 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Monthly Time Period License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL)

240

TATE OF CALIFORNI NERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

S TATE OF CALIFORNI A E NERGY COMMISSION 20001975 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Gray Davis, Governor OCTOBER 2000 P500-00-018 Reconciliation of Retailer Claims, 1999 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION William, Secretary for Resources S TATE OF CALIFORNI A E NERGY COMMISSION 20001975 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Gray

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Commissioning through "EDF Tower" construction  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

michel rouillot -architecte d.p.l.g. CommissioningCommissioningthrough through ??EDF TowerEDF Tower? construction? construction by Michel Rouillot Architect D.P.L.G. michel rouillot -architecte d.p.l.g. What is a building project ? michel rouillot... -architecte d.p.l.g. A spatial answerfor a work structure michel rouillot -architecte d.p.l.g. A very strong relationship between many building participants michel rouillot -architecte d.p.l.g. The production of the buildingThe production of the building...

Rouillot, M.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Chopwell Wood Health Project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Chopwell Wood Health Project An innovative project of school visits and General Practitioner. The project took place at Chopwell Wood a 360 hectare mixed woodland managed by the Forestry Commission to carry on being involved in the project. Next stage of the project Although the project leader has now

243

DOE/EA-1650: Freeport LNG Export Project and BOG/Truck Project Environmental Assessment (May 2009)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Freeport LNG Development, L.P. Freeport LNG Development, L.P. Docket Nos. CP03-75-003, CP03-75-004, CP05-361-001, and CP05-361-002 FREEPORT LNG EXPORT PROJECT and BOG/TRUCK PROJECT Environmental Assessment Cooperating Agency: U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA - 1650 DOE Docket No. FE-08-70-LNG MARCH 2009 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 OFFICE OF ENERGY PROJECTS In Reply Refer To: OEP/DG2E/Gas 2 Freeport LNG Development, L.P. Docket Nos. CP03-75-003, CP03-75-004 CP05-361-001 and CP05-361-002 §375.308(x) TO THE PARTY ADDRESSED: The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) and the Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Fuels, have prepared an environmental assessment (EA) on the liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities proposed by

244

Example Retro-Commissioning Statement of Work  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

11.3 11.3 Example Retro-Cx Scope of Work Example Retro-Commissioning Scope of Work To Include Services As Part of Super ESPC Detailed Energy Survey Background Agency requests that ESCo perform retro-commissioning services 1 , as detailed herein, as a part of performing the Detailed Energy Survey (DES) for site. The incremental cost for these services will be covered as a part of the project development cost for the Super ESPC project, whether or not viable measures are identified and ultimately implemented. It is the intent of the Agency to expand the work that will be performed during the DES. Leveraging the DES to complete a thorough scoping of retro-commissioning opportunities will substantially enhance the value of the ESCO services by ensuring that

245

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Keywords: California Energy Commission, cool roofs, lowsloped roofs, solar reflectance, thermal emittanceCalifornia Energy Commission STAFF REPORT DRAFT EVALUATION REPORT 2008 Building Energy Layer DECEMBER 2012 CEC4002012018SD CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor #12

246

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT 20142015 INVESTMENT PLAN UPDATE FOR THE ALTERNATIVE AND RENEWABLE FUEL AND VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM OCTOBER 2013 CEC6002013003SD CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Charles Smith Primary

247

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT-2010-020 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Janna Franks Primary Author Steve Williams Senior Technical members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily

248

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY EFFICIENT APPLIANCE REBATE PROGRAM GUIDELINES FOURTH EDITION ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION DECEMBER 16, 2009 AMENDED MARCH 24 Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12; i CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas

249

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY EFFICIENT APPLIANCE REBATE PROGRAM GUIDELINES SECOND THIRD EDITION ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION DECEMBER 16, 2009 AMENDED MARCH and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12; i CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas Chairman James D

250

The Fast-spectrum Transmutation Experimental Facility FASTEF: Main design achievements (part 2: Reactor building design and plant layout) within the FP7-CDT collaborative project of the European Commission  

SciTech Connect

MYRRHA (Multi-purpose hybrid Research Reactor for High-tech Applications) is the flexible experimental accelerator-driven system (ADS) in development at SCK-CEN in replacement of its material testing reactor BR2. SCK-CEN in association with 17 European partners from industry, research centres and academia, responded to the FP7 (Seventh Framework Programme) call from the European Commission to establish a Central Design Team (CDT) for the design of a Fast Spectrum Transmutation Experimental Facility (FASTEF) able to demonstrate efficient transmutation and associated technology through a system working in subcritical and/or critical mode. The project has started on April 01, 2009 for a period of three years. In this paper, we present the latest concept of the reactor building and the plant layout. The FASTEF facility has evolved quite a lot since the intermediate reporting done at the ICAPP'10 and ICAPP'11 conferences 1,2. Many iterations have been performed to take into account the safety requirements. The present configuration enables an easy operation and maintenance of the facility, including the possibility to change large components of the reactor. In a companion paper 3, we present the latest configuration of the reactor core and primary system. (authors)

De Bruyn, D.; Engelen, J. [Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol (Belgium); Ortega, A.; Aguado, M. P. [Empresarios Agrupados A.I.E., Magallanes 3, 28015 Madrid (Spain)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

Chapter 9: Commissioning the Building  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

: : Commissioning the Building Commissioning Process Overview Commissioning Activities and Documentation LANL | Chapter 9 Commissioning the Building Commissioning Process Overview Commissioning is a process - a systematic process of ensuring that a building performs in accordance with the design intent, contract documents, and the owner's operational needs. Commissioning is fundamental to the success of the whole-building design process. Due to the sophistication of building designs and the com- plexity of building systems constructed today, commis- sioning is necessary, but not automatically included as part of the typical design and contracting process. Commissioning is critical for ensuring that the building design is successfully constructed and operated.

252

Page 1 of 7 August 2008 California Public Utilities Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 of 7 August 2008 California Public Utilities Commission The Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Application Process for Utility Construction Transmission Projects A Step-By-Step Guide OVERVIEW: The California Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC) review of transmission line

253

Colorado Public Utility Commission's Xcel Wind Decision  

SciTech Connect

In early 2001 the Colorado Public Utility Commission ordered Xcel Energy to undertake good faith negotiations for a wind plant as part of the utility's integrated resource plan. This paper summarizes the key points of the PUC decision, which addressed the wind plant's projected impact on generation cost and ancillary services. The PUC concluded that the wind plant would cost less than new gas-fired generation under reasonable gas cost projections.

Lehr, R. L. (NRUC/NWCC); Nielsen, J. (Land and Water Fund of the Rockies); Andrews, S.; Milligan, M. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

2001-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

254

California Energy Commission PRELIMINARY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission PRELIMINARY STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES JULY 16, 2009 CEC-150 Recovery and Reinvestment Act State Energy Program Guidelines 5 A. Background ....................................................................................................................... 12 R. Reallocation of Funds

255

California Energy Commission REGULATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission REGULATIONS NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING ENERGY Office Manager High Performance Buildings and Standards Development Office Dave Ashuckian Deputy Director Efficiency and Renewable Energy Division Robert Oglesby Executive Director DISCLAIMER

256

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, October 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

257

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, August 1991  

SciTech Connect

This Environmental Regulatory Update Table (August 1991) provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M., Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, September 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, November 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

Environmental regulatory update table, July 1991  

SciTech Connect

This Environmental Regulatory Update Table (July 1991) provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, November 1990  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Hawkins, G.T.; Houlberg, L.M.; Noghrei-Nikbakht, P.A.; Salk, M.S.

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) Delaware River Basin Commission (Multiple States) < Back Eligibility Utility Commercial Agricultural Investor-Owned Utility State/Provincial Govt Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Installer/Contractor Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Systems Integrator Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Program Info Start Date 1961 State Delaware Program Type Environmental Regulations Siting and Permitting Provider Project Review Section The Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) is a federal-interstate compact government agency that was formed by concurrent legislation enacted in 1961 by the United States and the four basin states (Pennsylvania, New York, New

263

EIS-0488: Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

88: Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG 88: Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, LA EIS-0488: Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, LA SUMMARY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing an EIS, with DOE as a cooperating agency, to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to expand the existing Cameron Pipeline by 21 miles (from Calcasieu to Beauregard Parishes, Louisiana, with modifications in Cameron Parish), and expand an existing liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, to enable the terminal to liquefy and export the LNG. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES Comment Period Ends: 03/03/14 DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD January 10, 2014

264

EIS-0488: Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8: Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG 8: Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, LA EIS-0488: Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, LA SUMMARY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing an EIS, with DOE as a cooperating agency, to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to expand the existing Cameron Pipeline by 21 miles (from Calcasieu to Beauregard Parishes, Louisiana, with modifications in Cameron Parish), and expand an existing liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, to enable the terminal to liquefy and export the LNG. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 13, 2012 EIS-0488: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

265

EIS-0487: Freeport LNG Liquefaction Project, Brazoria County, Texas |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

87: Freeport LNG Liquefaction Project, Brazoria County, Texas 87: Freeport LNG Liquefaction Project, Brazoria County, Texas EIS-0487: Freeport LNG Liquefaction Project, Brazoria County, Texas SUMMARY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing an EIS, with DOE as a cooperating agency, to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate the Freeport Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Liquefaction Project, which would expand an existing LNG import terminal on Quintana Island in Brazoria County, Texas, to enable the terminal to liquefy and export the LNG. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 25, 2012 EIS-0487: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Freeport LNG Liquefaction Project, Brazoria County, Texas

266

Retro-Commissioning Increases Data Center Efficiency at Low Cost  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Fact sheet discusses a success story detailing a retro-commissioning project at the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site to increase data center energy efficiency at low costs.

267

California Energy Commission BLOCK GRANT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission BLOCK GRANT GUIDELINES (FORMULA-BASED GRANTS) ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION OCTOBER 7, 2009 CEC-150 Grant (EECBG) Program Guidelines 1. Background The California Energy Commission1 (Energy Commission) has

268

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT THE NATURAL GAS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor MARCH 2012 CEC5002012084 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily represent the views

269

EIA - Natural Gas Pipeline Network - Regulatory Authorities  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Regulatory Authorities Regulatory Authorities About U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines - Transporting Natural Gas based on data through 2007/2008 with selected updates U.S. Natural Gas Regulatory Authorities Beginning | Regulations Today | Coordinating Agencies | Regulation of Mergers and Acquisitions Beginning of Industry Restructuring In April 1992, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued its Order 636 and transformed the interstate natural gas transportation segment of the industry forever. Under it, interstate natural gas pipeline companies were required to restructure their operations by November 1993 and split-off any non-regulated merchant (sales) functions from their regulated transportation functions. This new requirement meant that interstate natural gas pipeline companies were allowed to only transport natural gas for their customers. The restructuring process and subsequent operations have been supervised closely by FERC and have led to extensive changes throughout the interstate natural gas transportation segment which have impacted other segments of the industry as well.

270

Regional Transmission Projects: Finding Solutions  

SciTech Connect

The Keystone Center convened and facilitated a year-long Dialogue on "Regional Transmission Projects: Finding Solutions" to develop recommendations that will help address the difficult and contentious issues related to expansions of regional electric transmission systems that are needed for reliable and economic transmission of power within and across regions. This effort brought together a cross-section of affected stakeholders and thought leaders to address the problem with the collective wisdom of their experience and interests. Transmission owners sat at the table with consumer advocates and environmental organizations. Representatives from regional transmission organizations exchanged ideas with state and federal regulators. Generation developers explored common interests with public power suppliers. Together, the Dialogue participants developed consensus solutions about how to begin unraveling some of the more intractable issues surrounding identification of need, allocation of costs, and reaching consensus on siting issues that can frustrate the development of regional transmission infrastructure. The recommendations fall into three broad categories: 1. Recommendations on appropriate institutional arrangements and processes for achieving regional consensus on the need for new or expanded transmission infrastructure 2. Recommendations on the process for siting of transmission lines 3. Recommendations on the tools needed to support regional planning, cost allocation, and siting efforts. List of Dialogue participants: List of Dialogue Participants: American Electric Power American Transmission Company American Wind Energy Association California ISO Calpine Corporation Cinergy Edison Electric Institute Environmental Defense Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Great River Energy International Transmission Company ISO-New England Iowa Public Utility Board Kanner & Associates Midwest ISO National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates National Grid Northeast Utilities PA Office of Consumer Advocates Pacific Gas & Electric Corporation Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission PJM Interconnection The Electricity Consumers Resource Council U.S. Department of Energy US Department of the Interior Van Ness Feldman Western Interstate Energy Board Wind on the Wires Wisconsin Public Service Commission Xcel Energy

The Keystone Center

2005-06-15T23:59:59.000Z

271

Public Utility Regulatory Act, Alternative Energy Providers (Texas) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulatory Act, Alternative Energy Providers (Texas) Regulatory Act, Alternative Energy Providers (Texas) Public Utility Regulatory Act, Alternative Energy Providers (Texas) < Back Eligibility Utility Fed. Government Commercial Investor-Owned Utility Industrial Construction Municipal/Public Utility Local Government Rural Electric Cooperative Tribal Government Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State Texas Program Type Safety and Operational Guidelines Provider Public Utility Commission of Texas Chapter 35 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act specifically addresses alternative energy providers, and contains provisions designed to aid such providers in selling power in Texas's competitive utility market. The

272

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Proceedings: A Guide for Intervenors  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

U.S. 396 (1961); Vermont Yankee, 435 U.S. 519; Morningsidein two 2. See, e.g. , Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.8th Cir. 1971); and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.

Hansell, Dean

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station as indicated by Reference (1). In Reference (2), Entergy provided the analysis for the reactor pressure vessel feedwater nozzles. In Reference (3), the NRC, in License Condition 4, established the requirement for Entergy to submit the confirmatory analyses for the recirculation outlet nozzle and core spray nozzle at least two years prior to the period of extended operation. In Reference (4), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) ordered Entergy to submit the results of the analysis for the core spray and recirculation outlet nozzles prior to a final ruling of Contentions 2A and 2B. Confirmatory analysis for the recirculation outlet and core spray nozzles was submitted to the NRC and ASLB in Reference (5) on January 15, 2009. Based on recent revisions to the recirculation outlet and core spray nozzle confirmatory

Vermont Yankee

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, January 1995. Volume 41, Number 1  

SciTech Connect

This book contains issuances of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards for January 1995. The issuances include Babcock and Wilcox Company materials license; Hydro Resources, Inc. application for uranium mining; low-level waste storage in Utah; communication of emerging and existing generic, technical issues with PWR owners groups; and radioactive waste management by Sierra Nuclear Corporation.

NONE

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D. C...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

d r e s u l t . The r a d i o a c t i v i t y i n t + h e waste - g a s s t o r a g e , tanks. -(WGST) and l i q u i d waste - s t o r a g e t a n k s (LWST) .are- v e r y small...

276

Commissioner George Apostolakis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(Reactors) · Study the system as an integrated socio- technical system · Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA Enrichment Power Reactors Transportation Storage Waste Disposal Uranium Conversion Medical/Industrial #12;The Traditional Approach to Regulation (Before Risk Assessment) · Management of uncertainty (unquantified

Bernstein, Joseph B.

277

Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

hosted a GNEP Ministerial in Washington, DC, where leaders from China, France, Japan, Russia and the United States agreed to work together to bring the benefits of nuclear energy...

278

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments relevant to the following two sections of the RFI: "Long Term Issues: Managing a Grid with High Penetration of New Technologies" and "Reliability and Cyber-Security," US...

279

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances, July--December 1995  

SciTech Connect

Digests and indexes for issuances of the NRC, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, the Administrative Law Judges, the Directors` Decisions, and the Decisions on Petitions for Rulemaking are presented in this document. These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances. Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are: (1) case name, (2) full text reference, (3) issuance number, (4) issued raised by appellants, (5) legal citations, (6) name of facility and Docket number, (7) subject matter, (8) type of hearing, and (9) type of issuance.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

to change the Visual Quality Objective (VQO) in the area where the Pacific Connector pipeline corridor would cross Big Elk Road, at MP 161.4 in Section 16, T.37S., R.4E.,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WAWINGTON. D. C....  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

WAWINGTON. D. C. 20555 kpartmnt of Energy Al7N: Dr. W illiam E. Mott. Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division (EP-32) Washington, D.C. 20545 Dear Dr. kbtt: Enclosed...

282

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Revision 1 February 1996  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.1206 of 10 CFR Part 20, "Standards for Protection Against Radiation, " requires that before a planned special RADIATION EXPOSURE A. INTRODUCTION Section 19.12 of 10 CFR Part 19, "Notices, In- structions and Reports in the health protection issues asso- ciated with exposure to radioactive materials or radi- ation, Section 20

Meagher, Mary

283

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Revision 1 February 1996  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.1206 of 10 CFR Part 20, "Standards for Protection Against Radiation," requires that before a planned special OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE A. INTRODUCTION Section 19.12 of 10 CFR Part 19, "Notices, In- structions in the health protection issues asso- ciated with exposure to radioactive materials or radi- ation. Section 20

Rubloff, Gary W.

284

Legal and Regulatory | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Legal and Regulatory Legal and Regulatory Legal and Regulatory Below are resources for Tribes on legal and regulatory issues. A Guide to Community Solar: Utility, Private, and Non-Profit Project Development A resource for community solar project development aimed at community organizers, solar advocates, government officials, and utility managers. Provides information on various community solar project models (utility-sponsored, special purpose entities, non-profits), state policies that support community solar projects (group billing, virtual net metering, joint ownership), and tax policies and incentives. Source: U.S. Department of Energy. An Introduction to Geothermal Permitting This guide tracks the geothermal permitting process through multiple levels, addressing such issues as the importance of where the geothermal

285

GRR/Section 7-CA-a - State Plant Commissioning Process, Application for  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 7-CA-a - State Plant Commissioning Process, Application for GRR/Section 7-CA-a - State Plant Commissioning Process, Application for Certification < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-CA-a - State Plant Commissioning Process, Application for Certification 07CAAPlantCommissioningProcessApplicationForCertification.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies California Energy Commission Regulations & Policies Warren-Alquist Act California Code of Regulations, Title 20 - Public Utilities and Energy Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07CAAPlantCommissioningProcessApplicationForCertification.pdf 07CAAPlantCommissioningProcessApplicationForCertification.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

286

Regulatory and Permitting Information Desktop Toolkit (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect

Overview of DOE's Regulatory and Permitting Information Desktop (RAPID) Toolkit project, providing information on where to go to view documents and who to contact to get involved.

Young, K.

2014-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

287

Regulatory analysis technical evaluation handbook. Final report  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Handbook is to provide guidance to the regulatory analyst to promote preparation of quality regulatory analysis documents and to implement the policies of the Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG/BR-0058 Rev. 2). This Handbook expands upon policy concepts included in the NRC Guidelines and translates the six steps in preparing regulatory analyses into implementable methodologies for the analyst. It provides standardized methods of preparation and presentation of regulatory analyses, with the inclusion of input that will satisfy all backfit requirements and requirements of NRC`s Committee to Review Generic Requirements. Information on the objectives of the safety goal evaluation process and potential data sources for preparing a safety goal evaluation is also included. Consistent application of the methods provided here will result in more directly comparable analyses, thus aiding decision-makers in evaluating and comparing various regulatory actions. The handbook is being issued in loose-leaf format to facilitate revisions. NRC intends to periodically revise the handbook as new and improved guidance, data, and methods become available.

NONE

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Exploring the Standard Model Exploring the Standard Model       You've heard a lot about the Standard Model and the pieces are hopefully beginning to fall into place. However, even a thorough understanding of the Standard Model is not the end of the story but the beginning. By exploring the structure and details of the Standard Model we encounter new questions. Why do the most fundamental particles have the particular masses we observe? Why aren't they all symmetric? How is the mass of a particle related to the masses of its constituents? Is there any other way of organizing the Standard Model? The activities in this project will elucidate but not answer our questions. The Standard Model tells us how particles behave but not necessarily why they do so. The conversation is only beginning. . . .

289

SPEAR 3 Commissioning Software  

SciTech Connect

The short SPEAR 3 startup time required precommissioned software for machine setup, beam measurements and data analysis. To accomplish this goal, we used Matlab with the Accelerator Toolbox (AT), the Channel Access Toolbox (MCA) and Middle Layer software to integrate code and streamline production. This paper outlines the software architecture, describes the Middle Layer component and provides examples from SPEAR 3 commissioning.

Corbett, W.J.; Portmann, G.J.; Safranek, J.A.; Terebilo, A.; /SLAC, SSRL

2005-05-09T23:59:59.000Z

290

California Energy Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission: Although External Factors Have Caused Delays in Its Approval of Sites, Its Application Process Is Reasonable August 2001 2001-118 CaliforniaStateAuditor BUREAUOFSTATEAUDITS #12;The first five copies of each California State Auditor report are free. Additional copies are $3

291

Natural England Forestry Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Briefing Natural England Forestry Commission Environment Agency Slowing the Flow in Pickering - Flood Storage Option Background Following work by the Environment Agency, investigating the feasibility) reservoir, however, as the design progressed the Reservoir Panel Engineer assessed the design as being high

292

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION TRABUCONIGUEL  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION N.N. FLANCO KEMPSTER RERC GLEN AVON TRABUCONIGUEL CROWN COYGEN KENTER HILLS TELEGRAPH ARTESIA BOVINE SOQUEL PEYTON PLASTIC OLS ENERGY CHINO CIMGEN CHINO PEDLEY ARCHIBALD STATION K (OLYMPIC) STATION 11 SAWTELLE MWD VENICE CULVER SONY HYPERION N.N. LOSULFUR POLARIS STATION L

293

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, January/February 1995  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives impacting environmental, health, and safety management responsibilities. the table is updated bi-monthly with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Bock, R.E.; Mayer, S.J.; Salk, M.S.

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

EIS-0497: CE FLNG Project, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

497: CE FLNG Project, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana 497: CE FLNG Project, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana EIS-0497: CE FLNG Project, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana SUMMARY The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing, with DOE as a cooperating agency, an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas terminal in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, and approximately 37 miles of 42-inch diameter natural gas transmission pipeline to connect the terminal to natural gas infrastructure facilities. The project would include two floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) vessels that would pretreat, liquefy, store, and offload LNG; a berth for the FLNG vessels; and a berth and turning basin for traditional LNG carriers. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES

295

EA-1845: Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project, Cameron County, LA | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

45: Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project, Cameron County, LA 45: Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project, Cameron County, LA EA-1845: Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project, Cameron County, LA Summary DOE participated as a cooperating agency with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in preparing an EA for the Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with applications submitted by Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC, and Sabine Pass LNG, L.P., to FERC and to DOE's Office of Fossil Energy (FE) seeking authorization to site, construct, and operate liquefaction and export facilities at the existing Sabine Pass LNG Terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana. DOE adopted FERC's EA and issued a finding of no significant impact on August 7, 2012. Additional information is available at DOE/FE's Docket 10-111-LNG and

296

EA-1845: Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project, Cameron County, LA | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

45: Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project, Cameron County, LA 45: Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project, Cameron County, LA EA-1845: Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project, Cameron County, LA Summary DOE participated as a cooperating agency with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in preparing an EA for the Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with applications submitted by Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC, and Sabine Pass LNG, L.P., to FERC and to DOE's Office of Fossil Energy (FE) seeking authorization to site, construct, and operate liquefaction and export facilities at the existing Sabine Pass LNG Terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana. DOE adopted FERC's EA and issued a finding of no significant impact on August 7, 2012. Additional information is available at DOE/FE's Docket 10-111-LNG and

297

Commissioning / Performance Verification - Review of Applications for UESC & Lessons Learned  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Commissioning/Performance Commissioning/Performance Commissioning/Performance Verification Verification - - Review of Applications Review of Applications for UESC & Lessons Learned for UESC & Lessons Learned Edward Thibodo Edward Thibodo NAVFAC Southwest NAVFAC Southwest April 16, 2008 April 16, 2008 The Way it Was The Way it Was * * When asked about When asked about M & V M & V * * Response was why, Response was why, this is not an ESPC? this is not an ESPC? The Way it Was The Way it Was * * Develop Project D s evelop Projects * * Awarded Project A s warded Projects * * Develop More Pro D jects evelop More Projects * * Awarded More Pro A jects warded More Projects * * Develop More Projects Develop More Projects * * Awarded More Projects Awarded More Projects * * Develop More Project D s evelop More Projects * * Awarded More Project

298

SPPR Project Customer Comments Summary  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The following entities have provided comments on the SPPR Project as proposed by Western in the October 6, 2010 customer meeting. Colorado River Commission of Nevada...

299

Economic Development Project Districts (Indiana)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Redevelopment commissions may petition legislative bodies to designate economic development project districts in cities with populations between 80,500 and 500,000. Such districts may be...

300

Implementation of NUREG-1318 guidance within the Yucca Mountain Project  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy`s Yucca Mountain Project is implementing a quality assurance program that fulfills the requirements of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Additional guidance for this program was provided in NUREG 1318, ``Technical Position on Items and Activities in the High-Level Waste Geologic Repository Program Subject to Quality Assurance Requirements`` for identification of items and activities important to public radiological safety and waste isolation. The process and organization for implementing this guidance is discussed. 3 refs., 2 figs.

La Monica, L.B.; Waddell, J.D.; Hardin, E.L.

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Commissioning and Retro Commissioning Programs for Energy Efficiency  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Title Slide Commissioning and Retro Commissioning Programs for Energy Efficiency International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations, New York City Amit Kulkarni, Senior Engineer, National Grid www.powerofaction.com/efficiency 2... Presentation Goals ?Overview of National Grid?s Commissioning Program ?Types of Commissioning Programs ?Customer Examples www.powerofaction.com/efficiency 3 National Grid?s Energy Efficiency Programs Our commercial & industrial programs are designed...

Kuklarni, A.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

EIS-0164: Pacific Gas Transmission/Pacific Gas and Electric and Altamont Natural Gas Pipeline Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has prepared the PGT/PG&E and Altamont Natural Gas Pipeline Projects Environmental Impact Statement to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. This project addresses the need to expand the capacity of the pipeline transmission system to better transfer Canadian natural gas to Southern California and the Pacific Northwest. The U.S. Department of Energy cooperated in the preparation of this statement because Section 19(c) of the Natural Gas Act applies to the Departments action of authorizing import/export of natural gas, and adopted this statement by the spring of 1992. "

303

The use of probabilistic risk assessment to satisfy the Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s maintenance rule  

SciTech Connect

Maintenance and inspection at nuclear power plants consumes a large portion of a utility`s resources, making resource allocation for such procedures vital. The NRC Maintenance Rule, due to be implemented in July of 1996, requires utilities to select systems, structures, and components (SSCS) important to safety and to develop a monitoring program to ensure that these SSCs are capable of fulfilling their intended functions. In light of these concerns, two ratios were developed to compare the risk significance of individual components with the amount of plant staff time, or burden, associated with inspecting the component. These risk/burden ratios point out existing disparities between current inspection practices and safety concerns. These ratios can be used to develop new inspection schedules constituting a more equitable risk to burden distribution.

Dubord, R.M. [Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Cambridge, MA (United States). Dept. of Nuclear Engineering

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMPARISON California's Building Energy Efficiency Standards and the International Energy Conservation Code and American Society America Standard 90.1 JULY 2013 CEC4002013009 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown Jr

305

EIS-0489: Jordan Cove Liquefaction Project (Coos County, OR) and Pacific  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9: Jordan Cove Liquefaction Project (Coos County, OR) and 9: Jordan Cove Liquefaction Project (Coos County, OR) and Pacific Connector Pipeline Project (Coos, Klamath, Jackson, and Douglas Counties, OR) EIS-0489: Jordan Cove Liquefaction Project (Coos County, OR) and Pacific Connector Pipeline Project (Coos, Klamath, Jackson, and Douglas Counties, OR) SUMMARY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will prepare an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas facility in Coos County, Oregon, and to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline project that would cross Klamath, Jackson, Douglas, and Coos Counties, Oregon. DOE, along with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), U.S. Department of Agriculture (Forest Service), and the U.S. Department of the Interior (Bureau of Land Management, Bureau

306

Developing a Regulatory Framework for Extended Storage and Transportation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Developing a Regulatory Framework Developing a Regulatory Framework for Extended Storage and Transportation National Transportation Stakeholders Forum May 10-12, 2011 Denver, Colorado Earl Easton Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Outline * Current Regulatory Framework * Future Regulatory Needs * Technical Basis (with some examples) * Path Forward 2 Current NRC Regulatory Framework for Storage * Renewable Term Licenses * Aging Management Plan - Time-limited aging analyses - Design for prevention - Monitoring - how, how often, in-situ - Maintenance - what type - Corrective Actions - when 3 Dry Cask Storage * 63 licensed ISFSIs (8 more than 2010) * Expect 10 sites pursuing General License * Over 1400 loaded storage casks 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Number of ISFSIs Year Specific Licensees

307

July 18, 2014 Commission Meeting Minutes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This meeting was the inaugural meeting of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission). The Commission members heard opening remarks by Secretary...

308

Best Practice Commissioning Database for Green Buildings  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

via internet that can be continually updated. Usually, measures to enhance energy efficiency are realized together with repairs or renewals of systems or major building renovations or refurbishments. In these cases, energy savings are often a... & Baumann Consulting Engineers, Inc.) has been working on Commissioning (Cx) projects for existing commer- cial buildings. The findings of the analysis of 1,000 buildings of the City of Munich, Germany, the collec- tion of measures for the worldwide...

Baumann, O.; Domke, M.; Reiser, C.; Umpfenbach, M.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

Commission Meeting- October 6, 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This was the third meeting of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Labs.

310

California Energy Commission BLOCK GRANT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission REVISED BLOCK GRANT GUIDELINES (FORMULA-BASED GRANTS) ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR CONSIDERATION FOR ADOPTION BY THE CALIF. ENERGY COMMISSION and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program Guidelines 1. Background The California Energy Commission1 (Energy

311

TATE OF CALIFORNI NERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

s Policy Report on AB 1890 Renewables Funding, Publication No. P500-97-002. All Energy Commission reportsResults SecondEdition GUIDEBOOK RENEWABLEENERGYPROGRAM RENEWABLE ENERGY PROGRAM #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 20001975 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Gray Davis, Governor JULY 2000 P500-97-011V2B Volume2B NEW RENEWABLE

312

Commissioning for High Performance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

? Systems to be commissioned Typically less than 1% of total construction cost ESL-KT-13-12-46 CATEE 2013: Clean Air Through Energy Efficiency Conference, San Antonio, Texas Dec. 16-18 Sustainable Bldg Guidelines & Best Practices US Green Building... Council ? LEED European Green Building Councils ? BREEAM Estidama ? Pearl Rating System World Green Building Council ? No independent rating system ESL-KT-13-12-46 CATEE 2013: Clean Air Through Energy Efficiency Conference, San Antonio, Texas Dec...

Meline, K.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

STATE OF CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: Interested Parties FROM: Christina Snow, Compliance Office SUBJECT: Midway Sunset Cogeneration Company (85, 2010, the Midway Sunset Cogeneration Company (MSCC) filed a petition with the California Energy Commission requesting to modify the Midway Sunset Cogeneration Project. The 225-megawatt project

314

Norwegian National Program for Lifetime Commissioning and Energy Efficient Operation of Buildings  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The project Life-Time Commissioning for Energy Efficient Operation of Buildings is actually a network of industrial companies, private and public entities, and R&D organizations. The overall objective of the project is to contribute...

Novakovic, V.; Djuric, N.; Holst, J.; Frydenlund, F.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

315

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT SMART GRID ROADMAP FOR RENEWABLES INTEGRATION JULY 2013 CEC5002010029 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: California Energy Commission Dave Michel Project Manager Mike Gravely Office Manager Energy Efficiency

316

Commissioning Specifications | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Specifications Specifications Commissioning Specifications October 16, 2013 - 4:44pm Addthis Commissioning specifications outline basic requirements of the commissioning process and detail the roles and responsibilities of each party involved. System checklists, startup requirements, and performance testing procedures are typically included in the specifications to let contractors know what standards are required during the various testing phases involved throughout the commissioning process. Since renewable energy technologies are changing and developing rapidly, it is critical to have the commissioning specifications developed by a well-informed resource with up-to-date renewable energy expertise. This resource must also have a thorough understanding of how renewable energy

317

GRR/Section 7-OR-d - Expedited Plant Commissioning Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-OR-d - Expedited Plant Commissioning Process 7-OR-d - Expedited Plant Commissioning Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-OR-d - Expedited Plant Commissioning Process 07ORDExpeditedPlantCommissioningProcess.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Oregon Department of Energy Regulations & Policies Revised Statute 469 Oregon Administrative Rules 345-015 Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07ORDExpeditedPlantCommissioningProcess.pdf 07ORDExpeditedPlantCommissioningProcess.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative Power Plants with an average electric generating capacity of less than 100

318

GRR/Section 7-CA-b - State Plant Commissioning Process, Small Power Plant  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-CA-b - State Plant Commissioning Process, Small Power Plant 7-CA-b - State Plant Commissioning Process, Small Power Plant Exception < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-CA-b - State Plant Commissioning Process, Small Power Plant Exception 07CABPlantCommissioningProcessSmallPowerPlantExemption.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies California Energy Commission Regulations & Policies California Code of Regulations, Title 20 - Public Utilities and Energy Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07CABPlantCommissioningProcessSmallPowerPlantExemption.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range.

319

GRR/Section 7-UT-c - Utah Public Service Commission | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-UT-c - Utah Public Service Commission 7-UT-c - Utah Public Service Commission < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-UT-c - Utah Public Service Commission 07UTCUtahPublicServiceCommissionProcess.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Utah Public Service Commission Regulations & Policies Utah Code Title 54 Public Utilities Utah Code 11-13-304 Certificate of public convenience and necessity required --Exceptions Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07UTCUtahPublicServiceCommissionProcess.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative

320

Speakers: Howard K. Gruenspecht, EIA Shahid Chaudhry, California Energy Commission  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

10: "The Energy-Water Nexus: Availability and Impacts" 10: "The Energy-Water Nexus: Availability and Impacts" Speakers: Howard K. Gruenspecht, EIA Shahid Chaudhry, California Energy Commission M. Michael Hightower, Sandia National Laboratories James Richenderfer, Susquehanna River Basin Commission Jeff C. Wright, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Note: Recorders did not pick up introduction of panel (see biographies for details on the panelists) or introduction of session.] Howard Gruenspecht: Okay, we're going to try to get underway here. We're still catching up on schedule from yesterday lunch, but I think we're making it back. Well, good morning, and welcome to the conference session on the Energy-Water Nexus. I'm Howard Gruenspecht, your moderator. Since it's going to be one of the last two

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

TidGen Power System Commercialization Project  

SciTech Connect

ORPC Maine, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ocean Renewable Power Company, LLC (collectively ORPC), submits this Final Technical Report for the TidGen Power System Commercialization Project (Project), partially funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DE-EE0003647). The Project was built and operated in compliance with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) pilot project license (P-12711) and other permits and approvals needed for the Project. This report documents the methodologies, activities and results of the various phases of the Project, including design, engineering, procurement, assembly, installation, operation, licensing, environmental monitoring, retrieval, maintenance and repair. The Project represents a significant achievement for the renewable energy portfolio of the U.S. in general, and for the U.S. marine hydrokinetic (MHK) industry in particular. The stated Project goal was to advance, demonstrate and accelerate deployment and commercialization of ORPCs tidal-current based hydrokinetic power generation system, including the energy extraction and conversion technology, associated power electronics, and interconnection equipment capable of reliably delivering electricity to the domestic power grid. ORPC achieved this goal by designing, building and operating the TidGen Power System in 2012 and becoming the first federally licensed hydrokinetic tidal energy project to deliver electricity to a power grid under a power purchase agreement in North America. Located in Cobscook Bay between Eastport and Lubec, Maine, the TidGen Power System was connected to the Bangor Hydro Electric utility grid at an on-shore station in North Lubec on September 13, 2012. ORPC obtained a FERC pilot project license for the Project on February 12, 2012 and the first Maine Department of Environmental Protection General Permit issued for a tidal energy project on January 31, 2012. In addition, ORPC entered into a 20-year agreement with Bangor Hydro Electric Company on January 1, 2013 for up to 5 megawatts at a price of $215/MWh, escalating at 2.0% per year.

Sauer, Christopher R. [President & CEO] [President & CEO; McEntee, Jarlath [VP Engineering & CTO] [VP Engineering & CTO

2013-12-30T23:59:59.000Z

322

Colorado/Transmission/Regulatory Overview | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Colorado/Transmission/Regulatory Overview < Colorado‎ | Transmission Jump to: navigation, search Colorado Transmission Transmission Regulatory Overview Roadmap State Data Regulatory Overview General Transmission Permitting at a Glance In Colorado, local governments (counties and municipalities) have the authority to site high-voltage transmission lines. The State's authority in siting is limited to a backstop appeal process, by which utilities may submit an appeal to local government decisions to the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for review and resolution.

323

EIS-0494: Excelerate Liquefaction Solutions Lavaca Bay LNG Project, Calhoun  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4: Excelerate Liquefaction Solutions Lavaca Bay LNG Project, 4: Excelerate Liquefaction Solutions Lavaca Bay LNG Project, Calhoun and Jackson Counties, Texas EIS-0494: Excelerate Liquefaction Solutions Lavaca Bay LNG Project, Calhoun and Jackson Counties, Texas SUMMARY The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing, with DOE as a cooperating agency, an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas terminal consisting of two floating liquefaction, storage and offloading units and a 29-mile pipeline header system to transport natural gas from existing pipeline systems to the LNG terminal facilities. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 12, 2013 EIS-0494: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

324

EIS-0488: Cameron Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

88: Cameron Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana 88: Cameron Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana EIS-0488: Cameron Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana SUMMARY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing an EIS for a proposal to expand an existing liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal to enable it to liquefy and export LNG and to expand an existing pipeline by 21 miles. DOE is a cooperating agency in preparing the EIS. DOE, Office of Fossil Energy, has an obligation under Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act to authorize the import and export of natural gas, including LNG, unless it finds that the import or export is not consistent with the public interest. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES To comment on the Draft EIS, use one of the following methods and refer to FERC Dockets CP13-25-000 and CP13-27-000. FERC requests to receive comments

325

EA-1942: Cove Point Liquefaction Project, Lusby, MD | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2: Cove Point Liquefaction Project, Lusby, MD 2: Cove Point Liquefaction Project, Lusby, MD EA-1942: Cove Point Liquefaction Project, Lusby, MD SUMMARY The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing, with DOE as a cooperating agency, an EA, to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to add natural gas liquefaction and exportation capabilities to an existing Cove Point LNG Terminal located on the Chesapeake Bay in Lusby, Maryland. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 28, 2012 EA-1942: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment Cove Point Liquefaction Project, Lusby, MD September 24, 2012 EA-1942: Notice of Intent of to Prepare an Environmental Assessment Cove Point Liquefaction Project, Lusby, MD

326

EA-1949: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

49: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA 49: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA EA-1949: Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, Puget Sound, WA SUMMARY This EA analyzes the potential environmental effects of a proposal by the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snowhomish County, Washington to construct and operate the Admiralty Inlet Tidal Project. The proposed 680-kilowatt project would be located on the east side of Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, Washington, about 1 kilometer west of Whidbey Island, entirely within Island County, Washington. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the lead agency. DOE is a cooperating agency. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 9, 2013 EA-1949: FERC Notice of Availability Errata Sheet

327

Final audit report of remedial action construction at the UMTRA Project Mexican Hat, Utah -- Monument Valley, Arizona, sites  

SciTech Connect

The final audit report for remedial action at the Mexican Hat, Utah, Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites consists of a summary of the radiological surveillances/audits, quality assurance (QA) in-process surveillances, and QA remedial action close-out inspections performed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and the Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC); on-site construction reviews (OSCR) performed by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC); and a surveillance performed by the Navajo Nation. This report refers to remedial action activities performed at the Mexican Hat, Utah--Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Regulatory Oversight Program, July 1, 1993--March 3, 1997. Volume 2: Appendices  

SciTech Connect

On July, 1993, a Regulatory Oversight (RO) organization was established within the US DOE, Oak Ridge Operations to provide regulatory oversight of the DOE uranium enrichment facilities leased to the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC). The purpose of the OR program was to ensure continued plant safety, safeguards and security while the plants were transitioned to regulatory oversight by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Volume 2 contains copies of the documents which established the relationship between NRC, DOE, USEC, and DOL (Dept of Labor) required to facilitate regulatory oversight transition.

NONE

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

329

CALIFORNIA ENERGY Project Brochures  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the integrated design, construction, and operation of building systems. The Integrated Energy SystemsCALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Project Brochures Integrated Energy Systems: Productivity and Building of a larger research effort called Integrated Energy Systems: Productivity and Building Science Program

330

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents  

SciTech Connect

As part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program (SRP-UDP), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. The SRP-UDP has been completed and the SRP-Maintenance Program (SRP-MP) is now maintaining this listing. Besides updating previous information, Revision 3 adds approximately 80 citations. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Enforcement Manual, Generic Letters, Inspection Manual, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, Standard Technical Specifications and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Nickolaus, J.R.; Bohlander, K.L.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

' ' ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Frank K. Pittman, Director, bivisioa of Waste &&gement and s- portation, Headquarters j CONTAMItUTED RX-AEC-OWNED OR LEASED FACILITIES' This memorandum responds to your TWX certain information on the above subject. the documentation necessary to answer your available due to the records disposal vailing at the time of release or From records that are available and from disc&ions with most familiar with the transfer operations, &have the current radiological conditibn of transferred property is adequate under present standards. The following tabulations follow the format suggested in your TWX and are grouped to an operations or contract r+ponsibility. A,I Ex-AEC Storage Sites - I r:/ National Stockpile Site '(NSS) and OperatEonal

332

Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Intrastate Regulatory Act (Florida) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Pipeline Intrastate Regulatory Act Transmission Pipeline Intrastate Regulatory Act (Florida) Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Intrastate Regulatory Act (Florida) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Developer Fuel Distributor Industrial Investor-Owned Utility Municipal/Public Utility Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Utility Program Info State Florida Program Type Safety and Operational Guidelines Provider Florida Public Service Commission The regulation of natural gas intrastate transportation and sale is deemed to be an exercise of the police power of the state for the protection of the public welfare. The Public Service Commission is empowered to fix and regulate rates and services of natural gas transmission companies, including, without limitation, rules and regulations for determining the

333

Philippines-Support for the National Climate Commission | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Philippines-Support for the National Climate Commission Philippines-Support for the National Climate Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name GIZ-Philippines-Support for the National Climate Commission Agency/Company /Organization Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Sector Climate Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning, Pathways analysis Website http://www.giz.de/en/home.html Program Start 2012 Program End 2015 Country Philippines UN Region South-Eastern Asia References GIZ-Philippines-Support for the National Climate Commission[1] Philippine Climate Initiatives to get €3-Million Aid from German government[2] Program Overview "The German government will provide the Philippine government a total of €3-million, which will come in the form of a grant. Project partners

334

Microsoft Word - Eddy-LeaCommission20030618.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 18, 2003 June 18, 2003 Department of Energy Awards Eddy/Lea Regional Commission $300,000 Grant WASHINGTON, DC - Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham announced today that the Department of Energy will award $300,000 to the Eddy/Lea Regional Commission, the community reuse organization (CRO) for southern New Mexico. This grant will fund part of the commission's operating costs, as well as other specific projects, including continuing the business expansion and retention of a 28-block downtown area and assisting in efforts to create new jobs by recruiting new business and industry. "The Energy Department is a good neighbor to the communities surrounding our sites," Secretary Abraham said. "We will continue to work with the Eddy/Lea Regional Commission and

335

Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined Heat and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined Heat and Power Fuel Cell System Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined Heat and Power Fuel Cell System October 3, 2011 - 4:43pm Addthis U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu today applauded the commissioning of a combined heat and power (CHP) fuel cell system at Portland Community College in Oregon. The CHP fuel cell system will help Portland Community College save on its energy bills and help achieve its energy efficiency and sustainability goals. Students at the College will also learn about the fuel cell technology used in the project as part of a comprehensive alternative energy curriculum offered by the school. "The benefits of a combined heat and power fuel cell system, coupled with

336

COMMISSION REPORT 20122013 INVESTMENT PLAN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

COMMISSION REPORT 20122013 INVESTMENT PLAN UPDATE FOR THE ALTERNATIVE AND RENEWABLE FUEL, and diesel substitute fuels. State investment is necessary to fill the gap and fund the differential cost the Energy Commission to adopt an investment plan that describes how funding will complement existing public

337

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT TRANSPORTATION FUEL PRICE CASES AND DEMAND SCENARIOS and alternative fuel penetration goals of the state. Keywords: California fuel price forecasts, transportation Eggers. 2011. California Energy Commission. CEC-600-2011-001. Transportation Fuel Price Cases and Demand

338

STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Via E-Filing RE: Klamath Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 2082). California Energy Commission of Relicensing and Decommissioning Options for the Klamath Basin Hydroelectric Project1 (Klamath Consultant Economic Modeling of Relicensing and Decommissioning Options for the Klamath Basin Hydroelectric Project

339

Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commissioning Commissioning Process to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Commissioning Process on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Federal Requirements Program Management Commissioning Types Process Metering Computerized Maintenance Management Systems Maintenance Types Major Equipment Types Resources Contacts Greenhouse Gases

340

GRR/Section 7-FD-b - Plant Commissioning Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-FD-b - Plant Commissioning Process 7-FD-b - Plant Commissioning Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-FD-b - Plant Commissioning Process 07FDBPlantCommissioning.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Bureau of Land Management United States Forest Service Regulations & Policies Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 43 CFR 3200.4 43 CFR 3261.20 43 CFR 3274.10 43 CFR 3274.11 43 CFR 3274.13 43 CFR 3275.11 43 CFR 3275.12 Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07FDBPlantCommissioning.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative Commercial operations from a Federal lease, a Federal unit, or a

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

GRR/Section 7-OR-b - State Plant Commissioning Process | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

7-OR-b - State Plant Commissioning Process 7-OR-b - State Plant Commissioning Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 7-OR-b - State Plant Commissioning Process 07ORBStatePlantCommissioningProcess (1).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Oregon Department of Energy Regulations & Policies OAR 345-20-0011 Contents of a Notice of Intent OAR 345-015-0001 et seq Proceedings, including site certificate hearings Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 07ORBStatePlantCommissioningProcess (1).pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative

342

Proposed modifications to the Lower Mokelumne River Project, California: FERC Project No. 2916-004. Final environmental impact statement  

SciTech Connect

This final environmental impact statement (FEIS) has been prepared for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) to consider modifications to the existing Lower Mokelumne River Project (LMRP) (FERC Project No. 2916-004) in California. Chinook salmon and steelhead trout populations in the lower Mokelumne River have experienced recent declines and fish kills associated, in part, with discharges from Camanche Dam. The California Department of Fish and Game and the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance have asked the Commission to investigate and correct these problems. A wide range of different mitigation actions has been proposed by parties participating in the scoping of this proceeding, and staff has evaluated these proposed actions in this assessment. The staff is recommending a combination of flow and non-flow modifications to the existing license, including new minimum flow and minimum pool elevation requirements at Camanche Reservoir, ramping rates on dam releases, interim attraction and out-migrant spike flows, instream habitat improvements, and a series of studies and monitoring to determine feasible means for solving off-site fish passage problems.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

343

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

AVIAN/WIND STATISTICAL PEER REVIEW PROJECT Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by............................................................................................................................................ 1 SELECTION OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS .............................................................................................................................. 2 TECHNICAL EXPERTISE OF PEER REVIEW TEAMS

344

Orlando Utilities Commission - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Orlando Utilities Commission - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Orlando Utilities Commission - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Program (Florida) Orlando Utilities Commission - Commercial Energy Efficiency Rebate Program (Florida) < Back Eligibility Commercial Industrial Savings Category Home Weatherization Commercial Weatherization Heating & Cooling Commercial Heating & Cooling Cooling Appliances & Electronics Sealing Your Home Ventilation Heat Pumps Insulation Design & Remodeling Water Heating Maximum Rebate Custom projects: $50,000 per project and $100,000 per customer Program Info State Florida Program Type Utility Rebate Program Rebate Amount Window Film or Solar Screen: $1/sq. ft. Energy Star Windows: $2/sq. ft. Cool/Reflective Roof: $0.14/sq. ft. Block Wall Insulation: $0.66/sq. ft. Ceiling Insulation Upgrade: $0.14 sq. ft.

345

Environmental sciences division: Environmental regulatory update table July 1988  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Langston, M.E.; Nikbakht, A.; Salk, M.S.

1988-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

Environmental regulatory update table, July/August 1994  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated bi-monthly with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Bock, R.E.; Salk, M.S.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, November--December 1993  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated bi-monthly with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.; Danford, G.S.; Lewis, E.B.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, May--June 1994  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated bimonthly with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Bock, R.E.; Salk, M.S.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

September 15, 2014 Lab Commission Meeting Minutes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This meeting was the second meeting of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission). The Commission members heard opening remarks by Co-Chairs TJ...

350

CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION'S  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION'S APPLIANCE REGULATIONS: A Summary Guide, Including Forms for Manufacturers, Trade Associations, and Other ...............................................................................................................1 III. Where to Find the Energy Commission Appliance Efficiency Regulations .....2 IV. Where to Get

351

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STAFF DRAFT REPORT BENEFITS REPORT FOR THE ALTERNATIVE goals and alternative fuel use goals." Assembly Bill 109 also requires the Energy Commission AND RENEWABLE FUEL AND VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown, Jr

352

October 6, 2014 Lab Commission Meeting Minutes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission) was convened for its third meeting at 9:00 AM on October 6, 2014. The Commission members heard a DOE...

353

Low Dose Radiation Research Program: Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory, and Societal Impact of the DOE Low Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory, and Societal Impact of the DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program Antone L. Brooks Why This Project? For maximum benefit, state-of-the-art research and new data from the Low Dose Radiation Research Program must be available to other scientists, regulatory agencies, and the public. This project stays abreast of scientific advances in the field, gathers, integrates, and summarizes the research within the program, and disseminates this information to appropriate scientific, regulatory, and public venues. Project Goals Provides a focal point for distribution of information generated in the program, to scientific committees, other governmental and regulatory agencies, and to the public Provides scientific support for the Low Dose Program website

354

Cloudnet Project  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

Cloudnet is a research project supported by the European Commission. This project aims to use data obtained quasi-continuously for the development and implementation of cloud remote sensing synergy algorithms. The use of active instruments (lidar and radar) results in detailed vertical profiles of important cloud parameters which cannot be derived from current satellite sensing techniques. A network of three already existing cloud remote sensing stations (CRS-stations) will be operated for a two year period, activities will be co-ordinated, data formats harmonised and analysis of the data performed to evaluate the representation of clouds in four major european weather forecast models.

Hogan, Robin

355

Control System Design Guide Element 5--Integrated Commissioning and Diagnostics  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Control System Design Guide Element 5--Integrated Commissioning and Diagnostics Project 2 Performance Commercial Building Systems #12;Table of Contents: Control System Design Guide 1. How to Use the Design Guide 2. Control System Design Process 3. Selection and Installation of Control and Monitoring

356

Forestry Commission Wales Guidance on rental levels for Hydro Power  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

initiated a process to facilitate the development of small- scale hydro-electricity schemes on land ownedForestry Commission Wales Guidance on rental levels for Hydro Power Guidance on rental levels for hydro power projects Tel: 02920 475961 Email: hydrowales@forestry.gsi.gov.uk Version 1.0 Mike Pitcher 17

357

Types of Commissioning | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Types of Commissioning Types of Commissioning Types of Commissioning October 7, 2013 - 9:17am Addthis Several commissioning types exist to address the specific needs of equipment and systems across both new and existing buildings. The following commissioning types provide a good overview. New Building Commissioning New building commissioning happens during the design and construction of new facilities. The process ensures that systems and equipment in new buildings operate properly. This is done through design reviews, functional testing, system documentation, and operator training. Federal agencies should consider new building commissioning when building new facilities or undergoing major facility renovations. The process is best implemented through all phases of construction.

358

Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined Heat and Power Fuel Cell System Portland Community College Celebrates Commissioning of Combined Heat and Power Fuel...

359

Mississippi Public Service Commission Adopts Energy Efficiency...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mississippi Public Service Commission Adopts Energy Efficiency Rules Mississippi Public Service Commission Adopts Energy Efficiency Rules November 8, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis...

360

Arizona Corporation Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name: Arizona Corporation Commission Abbreviation: ACC Service Territory: Arizona Website: http:www.azcc.gov EIA Form 861 Data This...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

State Historical Resources Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Historical Resources Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name: State Historical Resources Commission Address: 1725 23rd Street, Suite 100 Place: Sacramento, CA Zip: 95816...

362

Oregon Public Utility Commission | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oregon Public Utility Commission Oregon Public Utility Commission Offer comments on the United States Department of Energy Smart Grid Request for Information (RFI). Oregon Public...

363

State Land Commission FAQ | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Commission FAQ Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: State Land Commission FAQ Abstract Frequently Asked Questions, California State Land...

364

BEFORE THE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Farlin Project Manager cmcfarli@energy.state.ca.us Deborah Dyer ddyer@energy.state.ca.us Staff Counsel PublicBEFORE THE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA declaration to each of the individuals on the proof of service list shown below: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

365

BEFORE THE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.state.ca.us Mary Dyas Project Manager mdyas@energy.state.ca.us Kerry Willis Staff Counsel kwillis@energyBEFORE THE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA the original signed document plus the required 12 copies to the address below: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

366

Retri-Commissioning the Aria Building Using Cite-AHU: An Annex 40 Collaboration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to develop a service tool called CITE-AHU, an automated commissioning tool for air-handling units. The work was carried out as part of an IEA Annex 40 research project and included the retro-commissioning of a real building in Paris as a field test...

Castro, N.; Vaezi-Nejad, H.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

Automated Testing of HVAC Systems for Commissioning Tim Salsbury and Rick Diamond  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Automated Testing of HVAC Systems for Commissioning Tim Salsbury and Rick Diamond Lawrence Berkeley of the commissioning of HVAC systems. The approach is based on software that generates a sequence of test signals for new and retrofit projects. Introduction The performance of many HVAC systems is limited more by poor

Diamond, Richard

368

Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework DOE's Nuclear Safety Enabling Legislation Regulatory Enforcement & Oversight Regulatory Governance Atomic Energy Act 1946 Atomic Energy Act 1954 Energy Reorganization Act 1974 DOE Act 1977 Authority and responsibility to regulate nuclear safety at DOE facilities 10 CFR 830 10 CFR 835 10 CFR 820 Regulatory Implementation Nuclear Safety Radiological Safety Procedural Rules ISMS-QA; Operating Experience; Metrics and Analysis Cross Cutting DOE Directives & Manuals DOE Standards Central Technical Authorities (CTA) Office of Health, Safety, and Security (HSS) Line Management SSO/ FAC Reps 48 CFR 970 48 CFR 952 Federal Acquisition Regulations External Oversight *Defense Nuclear Facility

369

Two (2) 175 Ton (350 Tons total) Chiller Geothermal Heat Pumps for recently commissioned LEED Platinum Building  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This project will operate; collect data; and market the energy savings and capital costs of a recently commissioned chiller geothermal heat pump project to promote the wide-spread adoption of this mature technology.

370

Regulatory Guide 5.29, Revision 2, "Special Nuclear Material Control and Accounting Systems for Nuclear Power Plants".  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION June 2013 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION June 2013 Revision 2 REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH Written suggestions regarding this guide or development of new guides may be submitted through the NRC's public Web site under the Regulatory Guides document collection of the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/contactus.html. Electronic copies of this regulatory guide, previous versions of this guide, and other recently issued guides are available through the NRC's public Web site under the Regulatory Guides document collection of the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/. The regulatory guide is also available through the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at

371

Commissioning/ verification : Daylighting The New York Times Building  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commissioning/ verification Commissioning/ verification Overview The architectural approach The owner's approach Daylighting field study Daylighting control systems Automated roller shades Procurement specifications Shades and Shade Controls Lighting Controls Visualizing daylight Commissioning/ verification Demand response Mainstream solutions Post-occupancy evaluation Publications Sponsors Project team Commissioning/ verification The construction cycle of the building life cycle is the time when the design intent is translated into a physical reality. Given novel integrated systems with which contractors (vendors, installers, commissioning (Cx) agents, etc.) do not have much experience, there is a risk that carefully laid plans will go amiss. To insure that the automated shading and daylighting control systems were installed and operating as intended, the manufacturers, LBNL, and the Times Company developed procedures to commission and verify system performance. With verification data resulting from these procedures, the Times Company possessed the unique capability to measure and compare performance to design intent then discuss and tune system performance with the manufacturer prior to closure of the work scope and occupancy of the building.

372

Demand Response & Smart Grid - State Legislative and Regulatory Policy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Demand Response & Smart Grid - State Legislative and Regulatory Policy Demand Response & Smart Grid - State Legislative and Regulatory Policy Actions: October 2008 to May 2010 Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Demand Response & Smart Grid - State Legislative and Regulatory Policy Actions: October 2008 to May 2010 Focus Area: Energy Efficiency, - Utility Topics: Socio-Economic Website: www.demandresponsesmartgrid.org/Resources/Documents/State%20Policy%20S Equivalent URI: cleanenergysolutions.org/content/demand-response-smart-grid-state-legi Language: English Policies: Regulations Regulations: Enabling Legislation This report reviews the implementation of utility efficiency programs in the United States at both the state and federal levels. In addition, the updated report catalogues regulatory commission action, independent of

373

Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities The Advanced Instrumentation, Information, and Control (II&C) Systems Technologies pathway of the Light Water Reactor Sustainability(LWRS) Program conducts a vigorous engagement strategy with the U.S. nuclear power industry, including the nuclear operating companies, major support organizations, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and suppliers. The goal of this engagement strategy is to develop a shared vision and common understanding across the nuclear industry of the need for II&C modernization, the performance improvement that can be obtained, and the opportunities for collaboration to enact this vision. The primary means of engaging the nuclear operating companies is through a

374

Regulatory guidance for lightning protection in nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was engaged by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) to develop the technical basis for regulatory guidance to address design and implementation practices for lightning protection systems in nuclear power plants (NPPs). Lightning protection is becoming increasingly important with the advent of digital and low-voltage analog systems in NPPs. These systems have the potential to be more vulnerable than older analog systems to the resulting power surges and electromagnetic interference (EMI) when lightning strikes facilities or power lines. This paper discusses the technical basis for guidance to licensees and applicants covered in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.204, Guidelines for Lightning Protection of Nuclear Power Plants, issued August 2005. RG 1.204 describes guidance for practices that are acceptable to the NRC staff for protecting nuclear power structures and systems from direct lightning strikes and the resulting secondary effects. (authors)

Kisner, R. A.; Wilgen, J. B.; Ewing, P. D.; Korsah, K. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P. O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6007 (United States); Antonescu, C. E. [U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

Regulatory Guidance for Lightning Protection in Nuclear Power Plants  

SciTech Connect

Abstract - Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was engaged by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) to develop the technical basis for regulatory guidance to address design and implementation practices for lightning protection systems in nuclear power plants (NPPs). Lightning protection is becoming increasingly important with the advent of digital and low-voltage analog systems in NPPs. These systems have the potential to be more vulnerable than older analog systems to the resulting power surges and electromagnetic interference (EMI) when lightning strikes facilities or power lines. This paper discusses the technical basis for guidance to licensees and applicants covered in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.204, Guidelines for Lightning Protection of Nuclear Power Plants, issued August 2005. RG 1.204 describes guidance for practices that are acceptable to the NRC staff for protecting nuclear power structures and systems from direct lightning strikes and the resulting secondary effects.

Kisner, Roger A [ORNL; Wilgen, John B [ORNL; Ewing, Paul D [ORNL; Korsah, Kofi [ORNL; Antonescu, Christina E [ORNL

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Commission Meeting- November 4, 2014  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories AgendaArgonne National LaboratoryTCS Conference Center9700 S. Cass AveArgonne, IL 60436November 4, 2014

377

REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

recommendations rest. The Commission's staff, Lowell Price and Mary Jane Reese, have a special claim on our by developing courses that focus on the historical evolution and comparative analysis of cultural traditions

Ford, James

378

Rivanna River Basin Commission (Virginia)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Rivanna River Basin Commission is an independent local entity tasked with providing guidance for the stewardship and enhancement of the water quality and natural resources of the Rivanna River...

379

COMMISSION REPORT PUBLIC INTEREST ENERGY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

transmission or distribution of electricity generated from renewable energy resources · Advanced electricity, clean energy, energy infrastructure, electric vehicles, Governor Brown's Clean Energy Jobs Plan The California Energy Commission manages public interest energy research for electric and natural gas research

380

Forestry Commission Sale of Timber  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

shall be exclusive of Value Added Tax, which shall be added to the purchase price of each Lot of satisfactory credit- worthiness. 12. The Forestry Commission's normal terms of payment for credit sales

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Forestry Commission Sale of Timber  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. All bids shall be exclusive of Value Added Tax, which shall be added to the purchase price of each Lot of satisfactory credit- worthiness. 12. The Forestry Commission's normal terms of payment for credit sales

382

Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Processes to Regulatory Processes to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on AddThis.com... About History & Impacts Statutory Authorities & Rules Regulatory Processes Plans & Schedules Reports & Publications Standards & Test Procedures Implementation, Certification & Enforcement Rulemakings & Notices Further Guidance ENERGY STAR® Popular Links Success Stories

383

Regulatory and technical reports (abstract index journal). Volume 20, No. 2: Compilation for second quarter April--June 1995  

SciTech Connect

This compilation consists of bibliographic data and abstracts for the formal regulatory and technical reports issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff and its contractors. It is NRC`s intention to publish this compilation quarterly and to cumulate it annually.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Final Regulatory Impact Review/ Final Environmental Assessment/Initial Regulatory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Final Regulatory Impact Review/ Final Environmental Assessment/Initial Regulatory Flexibility................................................................................................. 1 2 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW................................................................. 2 2 Analysis Amendment 97 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

385

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS for Modifying existing Chinook and chum salmon savings areas AMENDMENT 84 to the Fishery Management Plan by the current regulatory closure regulations, as much higher salmon bycatch rates are reportedly encountered

386

Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DRAFT Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis analyzes alternatives to include three species For Amendment 100 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

387

STATE OF CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Recommendation 6 Redwood Coast Energy Authority Northwest California Alternative Fuels Readiness Project $300 Alternative Fuel Readiness Proposed Awards California Energy Commission Alternative and Renewable FuelSTATE OF CALIFORNIA ­ NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA ENERGY

388

Continuous Commissioning of the Reynolds Army Community Hospital, Fort Sill, Oklahoma  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) during both phases of the project. In this paper the optimization of the facilities Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems through the CC process is presented. Detailed commissioning activities of the Hospital and Central Plant...

Turner, W. D.; Baltazar-Cervantes, J. C.; Martinez, J. T.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT Demonstration: California Energy Commission Prepared by: Electric Power Research Institute #12; Prepared by: Primary: California Energy Commission Jamie Patterson Contract Manager Fernando Pina Office Manager Energy Efficiency

390

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT ASSESSMENT OF LARVAL Coastal Boundary Layer Flow SEPTEMBER 2007 CEC5002013049 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Energy Commission Joe O'Hagan Contract Manager Linda Spiegel Office Manager Energy Generation Research

391

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT ENERGYEFFICIENT Energy Commission Prepared by: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory #12; PREPARED BY: Primary.lbl.gov Contract Number: 500-06-053 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Paul Roggensack Contract Manager

392

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT SAIC SOLAR DISH CONCENTRATOR WITH STIRLING ENGINE DECEMBER 2007 CEC5002013068 Prepared for: California Energy Commission: 500-00-034-15 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Hassan Mohammed Contract Manager Linda

393

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT HYBRID SOLAR LIGHTING5002013067 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: Oakridge National Laboratory Insert-04-034-18 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Hassan Mohammed Contract Manager Linda Speigel Office Manager

394

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT AUTOMATED ROOFTOP CEC5002013042 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: Lawrence Berkeley National Energy Commission Brad Meister Contract Manager Virginia Lew Office Manager Energy Efficiency Research

395

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT AN ASSESSMENT: California Energy Commission Prepared by: University of California, Davis #12; PREPARED BY: Primary Number: 500-01-016 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prab Sethi Contract Manager Linda Spiegel

396

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT DEVELOPMENT OF STEAM5002013092AP Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: University of California #12 Energy Commission David Effross Contract Manager Linda Spiegel Office Manager Energy Generation Research

397

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT ENERGYEFFICIENT HIGHTECH BUILDINGS DECEMBER 2008 CEC5002013062 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by-06-053 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Paul Roggensack Contract Manager Virginia Lew Office Manager

398

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT Developing5002013109 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: Growpro Inc #12; Prepared by Waimauku, New Zealand Contract Number: PIR-07-001 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Abolghasem

399

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT DEVELOPMENT Energy Commission Prepared by: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory #12; PREPARED BY: Primary-09-010 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Matthew Fung Contract Manager Virginia Lew Office Manager Energy

400

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES5002013051 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: 500-99-013 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Steve Ghadiri Contract Manager Fernando Piña

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT ENERGY for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: San Diego State Research Foundation #12: California Energy Commission Raquel Kravitz Program Manager Fernando Pina Office Manager Energy Systems

402

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT PLANNING ALTERNATIVE5002013021 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: Facet Decision Systems, Inc. #12-08-030 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Linda Spiegel Contract Manager Linda Spiegel Office Manager

403

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT Technology MARCH 2013 CEC5002012077 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: Heschong Mahone-03-026 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Kristy Chew Contract Manager Fernando Pina Office Manager Energy

404

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT ENERGY for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: San Diego State Research Foundation #12 Energy Commission Raquel E. Kravitz Program Manager Fernando Pina Office Manager Energy Systems Research

405

California Energy Commission DRAFT STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission DRAFT STAFF REPORT ACHIEVING ENERGY SAVINGS IN CALIFORNIA BUILDINGS CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Edmund G. Brown, Governor #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Betty Chrisman of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily represent the views

406

Phenylpropanoid related regulatory protein-regulatory region associations  

SciTech Connect

Materials and methods for identifying lignin regulatory region-regulatory protein associations are disclosed. Materials and methods for modulating lignin accumulation are also disclosed.

Apuya, Nestor (Culver City, CA); Bobzin, Steven Craig (Malibu, CA); Park, Joon-Hyun (Oak Park, CA); Doukhanina, Elena (Newbury Park, CA)

2012-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

407

Regulatory treatment of allowances and compliance costs  

SciTech Connect

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) established a national emission allowance trading system, a market-based form of environmental regulation designed to reduce and limit sulfur dioxide emissions. However, the allowance trading system is being applied primarily to an economically regulated electric utility industry. The combining of the new form of environmental regulation and economic regulation of electric utilities has raised a number of questions including what the role should be of the federal and state utility regulating commissions and how those actions will affect the decision making process of the utilities and the allowance market. There are several dimensions to the regulatory problems that commissions face. Allowances and utility compliance expenditures have implications for least-cost/IPR (integrated resource planning), prudence review procedures, holding company and multistate utility regulation and ratemaking treatment. The focus of this paper is on the ratemaking treatment. The following topics are covered: ratemaking treatment of allowances and compliance costs; Traditional cost-recovery mechanisms; limitations to the traditional approach; traditional approach and the allowance trading market; market-based cost recovery mechanisms; methods of determining the benchmark; determining the split between ratepayers and the utility; other regulatory approaches; limitations of incentive mechanisms.

Rose, K. [National Regulatory Research Institute, Columbus, OH (United States)

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ............................................................................................................................1 2 Regulatory Impact Review FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

409

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ..............................................................................................................................................1 2 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

410

What's Up with the California Commissioning Collaborative?  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

What's Up with the California Commissioning Collaborative? What's Up with the California Commissioning Collaborative? Speaker(s): Kristin Heinemeier Date: July 8, 2005 - 12:00pm Location: Bldg. 90 The California Commissioning Collaborative's objectives are: --to improve building performance by developing and promoting viable building commissioning practices in California; --to facilitate the development of cost effective programs, tools, techniques and service delivery infrastructure to enable the implementation of building commissioning processes; --to educate and inform concerning building commissioning processes; and --to identify opportunities, establish priorities and promote solutions relating to building commissioning processes in California. Find out about who the CCC is, and their latest activities,

411

Yucca Mountain Project Document Suspension, OAS-M-08-07 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Yucca Mountain Project Document Suspension, OAS-M-08-07 Yucca Mountain Project Document Suspension, OAS-M-08-07 Yucca Mountain Project Document Suspension, OAS-M-08-07 The Department or Energy's Office of Civilian Radioaztivc Waste Management (OCRWM) is preparing to obtain a license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to construct a permanent repository at Yucca Mountain for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. In December 2005, OCRWM identified design process inadequacies and suspended the appro\lal of new7 documents 'important to waste isolation' or safety analysis that were subject to quality assurance procedures. Waste isolation refers to limiting radioactive exposure to the public after the waste is placed in the repository; while safety refers to limiting exposure prior to

412

EA-1971: Golden Pass LNG Export and Pipeline Project, Texas and Louisiana |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

71: Golden Pass LNG Export and Pipeline Project, Texas and 71: Golden Pass LNG Export and Pipeline Project, Texas and Louisiana EA-1971: Golden Pass LNG Export and Pipeline Project, Texas and Louisiana SUMMARY The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing, with DOE as a cooperating agency, an EA to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate natural gas liquefaction and export facilities at the existing Golden Pass liquefied natural gas terminal in Jefferson County, Texas. The proposal includes approximately 8 miles of pipeline connecting to existing pipelines in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, and Jefferson County. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD October 16, 2013 EA-1971: FERC Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment

413

EIS-0493: Corpus Christi LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project, Nueces and San  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Corpus Christi LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project, Nueces 3: Corpus Christi LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project, Nueces and San Patricio Counties, Texas EIS-0493: Corpus Christi LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project, Nueces and San Patricio Counties, Texas SUMMARY The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing, with DOE as a cooperating agency, an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas export and import terminal on the north shore of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces and San Patricio Counties, Texas; a marine berth connecting the terminal to the adjacent La Quinta Channel; and an approximately 23-mile-long natural gas transmission pipeline and associated facilities. In June 2012, FERC issued a notice of intent to prepare an EA; in October 2012, FERC announced that

414

Yucca Mountain Project Document Suspension, OAS-M-08-07 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Yucca Mountain Project Document Suspension, OAS-M-08-07 Yucca Mountain Project Document Suspension, OAS-M-08-07 Yucca Mountain Project Document Suspension, OAS-M-08-07 The Department or Energy's Office of Civilian Radioaztivc Waste Management (OCRWM) is preparing to obtain a license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to construct a permanent repository at Yucca Mountain for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. In December 2005, OCRWM identified design process inadequacies and suspended the appro\lal of new7 documents 'important to waste isolation' or safety analysis that were subject to quality assurance procedures. Waste isolation refers to limiting radioactive exposure to the public after the waste is placed in the repository; while safety refers to limiting exposure prior to

415

Buildings, Commissioning, Efficiency, Comfort, and CO2  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Continuous commissioning and CC are registered trademarks of the Texas Engineering Experiment Station Commissioning of Existing Buildings Major International Activities ? IEA Annex 40 ?Commissioning of Buildings and HVAC Systems for Improved Energy... Performance? IEA Annex 47 ?Cost Effective Commissioning for Existing and Low Energy Buildings? Commissioning of Existing Buildings International Examples ? China ? to be added? Belgium ? to be added? Japan ? Akashi et al. Source: Mills et al. 2005 Source...

Claridge, D. E.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Emergency Petition and Complaint of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AND AND FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service ) Commission ) EMERGENCY PETITION AND COMPLAINT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Pursuant to Sections 202(c), 207 and 309 of the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), 16 U.S.C. §§ 824a(c), 824f and 825h, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DCPSC") hereby submits this Emergency Petition and Complaint to avert the impending shutdown of the Potomac River Generating Station power plant ("Potomac River Plant" or "Plant") owned and operated by Mirant Corporation and its public utility subsidiaries (collectively, "Mirant") in Alexandria, Virginia.

417

Limited exemption to hydroelectric licensing provisions for transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project. Introduced in the Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, April 27, 1995  

SciTech Connect

The report addresses bill S. 522 which is to provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico. The bill proposes to permit a limited exemption for a 12 mile transmission line to Rio Arriba County, New Mexico. The project was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The background and need for the exemption is presented. Statements of government officials are included.

NONE

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

418

Butt Joint Tool Commissioning  

SciTech Connect

ITER Central Solenoid uses butt joints for connecting the pancakes in the CS module. The principles of the butt joining of the CICC were developed by the JAPT during CSMC project. The difference between the CSMC butt joint and the CS butt joint is that the CS butt joint is an in-line joint, while the CSMC is a double joint through a hairpin jumper. The CS butt joint has to carry the hoop load. The straight length of the joint is only 320 mm, and the vacuum chamber around the joint has to have a split in the clamp shell. These requirements are challenging. Fig.1 presents a CSMC joint, and Fig.2 shows a CS butt joint. The butt joint procedure was verified and demonstrated. The tool is capable of achieving all specified parameters. The vacuum in the end was a little higher than the target, which is not critical and readily correctable. We consider, tentatively that the procedure is established. Unexpectedly, we discover significant temperature nonuniformity in the joint cross section, which is not formally a violation of the specs, but is a point of concern. All testing parameters are recorded for QA purposes. We plan to modify the butt joining tool to improve its convenience of operation and provide all features necessary for production of butt joints by qualified personnel.

Martovetsky, N N

2007-12-06T23:59:59.000Z

419

European Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Commission Commission Name European Commission Place Brussels, Belgium Website http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.h Coordinates 50.8503396°, 4.3517103° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":50.8503396,"lon":4.3517103,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

420

New Forestry Commission District Office The new Forestry Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

on sustainable design principles, ensuring a reduced carbon footprint in both the construction beams made from Douglas fir harvested from the Forestry Commission's own forests. The building design in Inverness demonstrates an exemplary approach to using sustainable principles and local timber

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

REGULATORY STATUS: AOC  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

184 UNIT NAME: Concrete Rubble pile 129) REGULATORY STATUS: AOC LOCATION: Outside plant security south of C-611 Water Treatment Plant. Estimated to be less than 5 cubic feet....

422

PROJECTS FROM FEDERAL REGION IX DOE APPROPRIATE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM - PART I  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

alternative energy educational program, Project SAW: Solar -Solar Energy Research Commission are interested in the program. Projectsolar energy. Award: Pro ect Term: ect Descr 14 months (Project

Case, C.W.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

Notices Safety Commission, 4330 East West  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Federal Register 0 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2012 / Notices Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923. Dated: January 10, 2012. Todd A Stevenson, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012-625 Filed 1-10-12; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 6355-01-P CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review, Comment Request AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service (the Corporation), has submitted a public information collection request (ICR) entitled Day of Service Project Promotion Tool for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104- 13, (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). Copies of this

424

What Is the Plan Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

What Is the Plan Commission & How Does It Work? Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service valuable to the community and to its elected and appointed officials. Plans and proposals from individuals- nance, and a subdivision ordinance. They also make recommendations to elected officials on proposed

425

University of Birmingham Policy Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Public service reform is an obvious focus for the first University of Birmingham Policy Commission is an important attempt to bring together evidence of past attempts at reform with new research and thinking the voices of young people in its work. So often, policy reformers and thinkers ignore this untapped resource

Birmingham, University of

426

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, improve air quality, and stimulate the sustainable production and use of biofuels within California submitted under the Biomethane Production grant solicitation and proposed for funding under the Alternative Solicitation PON09003 for Biomethane Production MAY 2010 CEC6002010004 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

427

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Many thanks are due to the following individuals for their contributions and technical support Supply and Demand Outlook provides a summary of the California Energy Commission staff assessment of electricity system or grid capability to provide power to meet peak electricity demand within California

428

Public Utilities Commission Consumer Programs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Public Utilities Commission Consumer Programs Water Programs The CPUC regulates company's service territory and have varying income limits. Check with your water utility to find out plans that can help you man- age your bills. Contact the utility directly, using the customer service

429

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: ALTHERMA AIR-TO-WATER SOURCE HEAT PUMP FOR THE RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS MARCH 2012 CEC Commission's approval of a compliance option for the Altherma AirtoWater Source Heat Pump system the equipment efficiency ratings necessary to calculate performance of the Altherma AirtoWater Source Heat Pump

430

California Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, such as fossil fuelbased power plants, and may ameliorate air quality problems and improve public health renewable energy resources, such as wind, solar, biomass, landfill gas, digester gas, geothermal, or smallCalifornia Energy Commission PROPOSED REGULATIONS INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR ENFORCEMENT

431

Best Practices in Existing Building Commissioning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OCTOBER 20-21, 2010 OCTOBER 20-21, 2010 RAPID CITY, SD Best Practices in Existing Building Commissioning Carl E. Lundstrom, P. E., CCP Federal Solutions Manager E M C Engineers, Inc. - Subsidiary of Eaton Corporation * The Purpose & Benefits of Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx) * The Building Commissioning Association (BCA) & "Best Practices" * Contracting & Hiring Qualified Providers * Typical Measures & Ideal Facilities * Success Factors Presentation Agenda What is The Building Commissioning Association? Integrity Leadership Quality Expertise  International non-profit organization (founded in 1998)  Recognized commissioning authority and resource  Commissioning providers, building owners, energy companies, facility managers, architects, engineers, and contractors

432

Creating a Comprehensive, Efficient, and Sustainable Nuclear Regulatory Structure  

SciTech Connect

Abstract. With the congressionally mandated January 1, 2013 deadline for the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Nuclear Material Protection, Control and Accounting (MPC&A) program to complete its transition of MPC&A responsibility to the Russian Federation, NNSA management directed its MPC&A program managers and team leaders to demonstrate that work in ongoing programs would lead to successful and timely achievement of these milestones. In the spirit of planning for successful project completion, the NNSA review of the Russian regulatory development process confirmed the critical importance of an effective regulatory system to a sustainable nuclear protection regime and called for an analysis of the existing Russian regulatory structure and the identification of a plan to ensure a complete MPC&A regulatory foundation. This paper describes the systematic process used by the U.S. DOE MPC&A Regulatory Development Project RDP) to develop an effective and sustainable MPC&A regulatory structure in the Russian Federation. This nuclear regulatory system will address all non-military Category I and II nuclear materials at State Corporation for Atomic Energy Rosatom, the Federal Service for Ecological, Technological, and Nuclear Oversight (Rostechnadzor), the Federal Agency for Marine and River Transport (FAMRT, within the Ministry of Transportation), and the Ministry of Industry and Trade (Minpromtorg). The approach to ensuring a complete and comprehensive nuclear regulatory structure includes five sequential steps. The approach was adopted from DOEs project management guidelines and was adapted to the regulatory development task by the RDP. The five steps in the Regulatory Development Process are: 1) Define MPC&A Structural Elements; 2) Analyze the existing regulatory documents using the identified Structural Elements; 3) Validate the analysis with Russian colleagues and define the list of documents to be developed; 4) Prioritize and schedule the development of documents; 5) Identify and develop processes to measure effectiveness of regulations. Utilizing this process is resulting in an effective regulatory process that is understood and is being adopted by the four RF organizations. It is anticipated that the current regulatory development process will continue after U.S. support ends. Utilization of the systematic methodology will ensure regulatory development is based on required MPC&A structural elements and will support the continued maintenance and development of an effective regulatory base.

O'Brien, Patricia; Wright, Troy L.; Tuttle, John D.; Hazel, Michael J.; Schlegel, Steven C.; Miller, Daniel R.

2009-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

433

On Line Beamline Commissioning Activity Approval Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commissioning Activity Approval Form Commissioning Activity Approval Form This form is to be filled by the Commissioning Activity Team Leader. No beamline commissioning activities will be allowed to run without a properly completed, approved, and posting of this commissioning approval form. You will be notified by e-mail upon approval. Sector Beamline Expected Start Date Expected Duration 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 BM ID ( Give a Unit) Activity Description( Give only a brief description) Commissioning Team Members First and Last Name Affiliation Phone Number 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Special Safety Concerns Commissioning Activity Team Leader Name E-Mail Address Submit Commissioning Activity Approval Form Clear all Fields and start All over again!!!

434

Blue Ribbon Commission Tour of Hanford Site  

SciTech Connect

The Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future toured the Department of Energy's Hanford Site on July 14, 2010. Commission members, invited guests, and members of the public visited facilities that store high-level, radioactive waste.

Paul Saueressig

2010-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

435

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES FIFTH EDITION CALIFORNIA ENERGY;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Robert Weisenmiller Chairman James D. Boyd Vice Chair Commissioners: Karen Brook, Municipal and Commercial Building Targeted Measure Program Larry Rillera, Clean Energy Business

436

Flathead Basin Commission Act of 1983 (Montana)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Act establishes the Flathead Basin Commission, the purpose of which is to protect the Flathead Lake aquatic environment, its waters, and surrounding lands and natural resources. The Commission...

437

November 4, 2014 LAB COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission) wasconvened for its fourth meeting at 9:00 AM on November 4, 2014. The meeting included three panels...

438

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1516 Ninth Street  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1516 Ninth Street Sacramento, California 95814 Main website: www acceptance testing for lighting controls and mechanical systems, and their employers. Concurrent COMMISSION 1516 Ninth Street 1st Floor, Hearing Room A Sacramento, California Wheelchair Accessible Remote

439

Blue Ribbon Commission Tour of Hanford Site  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

The Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future toured the Department of Energy's Hanford Site on July 14, 2010. Commission members, invited guests, and members of the public visited facilities that store high-level, radioactive waste.

Paul Saueressig

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

Integrated Commissioning for a Large Medical Facility  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, inpatient areas, critical areas, diagnostic areas, and pharmacy and a research center. An integrated commissioning of the HVAC system was performed for this building. The commissioning activities improved the building comfort conditions and reduced...

Zhu, Y.; Batten, T.; Turner, W. D.; Claridge, D. E.; Giebler, T.; Liu, M.; Zhou, J.; Cameron, C.; Keeble, B.; Hirchak, R.

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

PP-13 Federal Power Commission | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Federal Power Commission PP-13 Federal Power Commission Presidential permit authorizing Federal Power Commission to construct, operate, and maintain electric transmission...

442

West Virginia Smart Grid Implementation Plan (WV SGIP) Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WV DoE-NRCCE-APERC DRAFT February 16, 2009 WV DoE-NRCCE-APERC DRAFT February 16, 2009 1 West Virginia Smart Grid Implementation Plan (WV SGIP) Project APERC Report on Customer Complaints to WV PSC about Electric Power Service Ali Feliachi, Muhammad Choudhry, John Saymansky and Ed Sneckenberger February 16, 2009 Introduction APERC has appreciated that one of the most important sources for data on the consumer perspective of the current electric power grid in West Virginia would be the WV Public Service Commission (WV PSC). Thus, an email request was sent on December 19, 2008 to Byron Harris at the WV PSC to request any advice or approaches to determine customer and regulatory perspectives of the current electric power grid in WV. Customer Complaint Data Bryon Harris was able to provide a spreadsheet of customer complaints in West Virginia for

443

Technical Data Catalog: Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project. Quarterly supplement  

SciTech Connect

This report presents reference information contained in the Yucca Mountain Project Automated Technical Data Tracking System. The Department of Energy is seeking to design and maintain a geologic repository for the disposal of high-level radioactive wastes. However, before this repository can be built, the DOE must first do a comprehensive site evaluation. This evaluation is subject to many regulations. This report fulfills the reporting requirements of the Site-Specific Procedural Agreement for Geologic Repository to develop and maintain a catalog of data which will be updated and provided to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on a quarterly basis. This catalog contains: description of data; time, place, and method of acquisition; and where data may be examined.

NONE

1995-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

444

Impact of Lack of Consistent Free Release Standards on Decommissioning Projects and Costs  

SciTech Connect

While the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has had specific and dose-based standards for the release of liquids and gases for a long time, there are no regulatory mechanisms in place for the release of solid bulk materials from a nuclear power plant. Even though free releases of small quantities of solid materials continue under existing guidelines from the operating plants, the regulatory void creates major difficulties for the bulk materials that result from the decommissioning of a nuclear site. Decommissioning of a commercial nuclear power plant generates large quantities of solid bulk materials such as concrete, metal, and demolition debris. Disposition of such materials has a large impact on the overall decommissioning cost. Yet, there are no clear and cost-effective alternatives for the disposal of these materials from a regulatory perspective. This paper discusses the methodologies for clearance of solid materials1, their applicability to the disposition of bulk materials, and the impact of lack of consistent free release standards on the decommissioning projects and costs.

Devgun, J. S.

2002-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

445

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contacts Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on

446

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES DRAFT SIXTH FIFTH EDITION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION ON FEBRUARY 158, 20112012 CEC-150-2009-004-CMF-REV4REV5 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12;2 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Robert Weisenmiller Chairman James

447

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES SECOND EDITION ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FEBRUARY 10, 2010 CEC-150-2009-004-CMF-REV1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas Chairman James D. Boyd Vice Chair

448

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES PROPOSED THIRD EDITION SECOND EDITION PROPOSED TO ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION AUGUST 6, FEBRUARY 10, 2010 CEC-150-2009-004-CMF-REV21 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12;2 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas

449

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

California Energy Commission STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GUIDELINES FOURTH EDITION ADOPTED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 CEC-150-2009-004-CMF-REV3 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 #12;CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Karen Douglas Chairman James D. Boyd Vice Chair

450

The California Energy Commission and Its Programs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) provide market support to existing, new and emerging renewable technologies. With energy challenges facingThe California Energy Commission and Its Programs A Public Information Guide Prepared by the Public Adviser's Office of the California Energy Commission #12;Background The California Energy Commission

451

Danish Atomic Energy Commission Research Establishment Riso  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

10 Ol CM l-l I S l ^. n ·H Danish Atomic Energy Commission Research Establishment Riso Chemistry Atomic Energy Commission Z. Fordos, Concrete Research Laboratory Karlstrup M. Skytte, Betonvarefabriken. E. Bjergbakke, Accelerator Dept. Danish Atomic Energy Commission Z. FSrdos, Concrete Research

452

so Ris Report * Danish Atomic Energy Commission  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

so Risø Report r- 6 §* Danish Atomic Energy Commission 2 Research Establishment Risø Incorporation Commission Research Establishment Risø by lb Larsen Danish Atomic Energy Commission Research Establishment in Bitumen of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Water Evaporator Concentrate at the Danish Atomic Energy Com

453

EV Community Readiness projects: Delaware Valley Regional Planning...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (PA); Metropolitan Energy Information Center, Inc. (KS, MO) EV Community Readiness projects: Delaware Valley Regional Planning...

454

U. S. Atomic Energy Commission  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Commission Commission Division of Licensing and Regulation Washington 25, D. C. .I,.----- Attention: Mr. Eber R. Price Gentlemen: ' B?&-# This is in response to your letter of 17 April 1962 regarding the inspection conducted at our Jayhawk Works at Pittsburg, Kansas on May 2-5, 1961 under Source Material License C-4352 and Special Nuclear Material Licenses No. S&l-154 and SNM-329. Replying to your items as listed in your letter, we submit the following in- formation'for your consideration: I. Time-occupancy studies have been made in the area where high air-borne dust samples were observed. A. I&dents Involving Thorium Six incidents have been noted involving thorium, natural isotopic CLSS5.Y. follows: The counts of the air samples in these six samples are as

455

U. S. Atomic Energy Commission  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Commission Commission Division of Licensing and Regulation Washington 25, D. C. Attention: Mr. Eber R. Price Gentlemen: This is in response to your letter of 17 April 1962 regarding the inspection conducted at our Jayhawk Works at Pittsburg, Kansas on May Z-5, 1961 under Source Material License C-4352 and Special Nuclear Material Licenses No. SW-154 and S.Iw-329. Reblying to your items as listed in your letter, we submit the following in- formation'for your consideration: I. Time-occupancy studies have been made in the area where high air-borne dust samples "ere observed. A. Incidents Involving Thorium Six incidents have bee" noted involving thorium, natural isotopic ClSS=y. The counts of the air samples in these six samples are as follows: Microcuries per ml of Air

456

BC2 Chicane BPM Commissioning  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

BC2 Chicane BPM Commissioning 01-12-09 Goals: e-5 4e-5 to 9e-5 7e-5 2e-4 2e-4 + 1e-2 Energy resolution 80 mm25 mBC2 BPM 1.3 GHz front-end 1 mm2 mBC2 BPM optical front-end 2 mm15 m to 30 mPhotomultiplier Tube Monitor 10 cm70 mOut-of-loop Vector Sum

457

February 2008 In 2003, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Energy Commission, and the California  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

#12;February 2008 In 2003, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Energy, the Energy Commission and the Public Utilities Commission adopted a second plan, Energy Action Plan II a comprehensive set of recommended actions to achieve these policies. The Public Utilities Commission has a number

458

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Energy Research and Development Division FINAL PROJECT REPORT INTEGRATING BUILDING COMMISSIONING DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has

459

Building Commissioning in the USA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

US Team Early Cx and RCx Research, Guides, and Demonstration Projects: ? Government ? DOE / EPA, NIST? National Labs: LBNL, ORNL ? Universities: Texas A&M? ASHRAE ? First HVAC Cx Guideline (1989)? Utilities: BPA ? 1st demo. project & utility...

Castro, N.; Friedman, H.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

460

STATE OF CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Recommendation 6 Redwood Coast Energy Authority Northwest California Alternative Fuels Readiness Project $300 Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program California Energy Commission Alternative Fuel*** Redwood Coast Energy Authority Northwest Califoirnia Alternative Fuels Readiness Project $300,000 $0 $60

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Power Plant in 1980, and operations to produce electricity for the State Water Project commenced in 1985 Project. The Commission certified the 55 MW Department of Water Resources (DWR) Bottle Rock Geothermal the date of approval of the subject petition. This time extension will allow BRPC to remedy the impediments

462

MARKETING WORKS: Marketing Works is an opportunity for companies and organizations to commission a marketing  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MARKETING WORKS: Marketing Works is an opportunity for companies and organizations to commission a marketing project, undertaken by postgraduate students from Strathclyde Business School's MSc programmes in the marketing department. In 2010/11 we undertook 22 Marketing Works projects, to include a wide range

Mottram, Nigel

463

BEFORE THE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

BEFORE THE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1516 FOR CERTIFICATION Docket No. 09-AFC-7 FOR THE PALEN SOLAR POWER PLANT PROJECT PROOF OF SERVICE (Revised 8 harron@solarmillenium.com *Michael Cressner, Project Development & Permitting Solar Millennium, LLC 1111

464

Commission.  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Len Myers Special Requests (301) 903-2180 Len.Myers@nnsa.doe.gov Patricia Smith NRC Reconciliation (301) 903-6860 PatriciaR.Smith@nnsa.doe.gov Homepage: http:...

465

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

project changed from a CNG station to a liquefied natural gas (LNG) station, and the project proposer will integrate a new LNG dispenser at the fueling station. The project will increase the LNG storage capacity and fueling capacity of the station and as a result, fewer deliveries to supply onsite LNG tanks will occur

466

IUPAC Solubility Data Project 1973?2001  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This is a history of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Solubility Data Commission and the Solubility Data Project that it organized and supervised. ... This worked fine when the projects were not too large, but the Solubility Data Project planned large time-consuming projects. ... H. L. Clever, Krypton, Xenon and Radon (1979), xx + 357 pp. ...

H. Lawrence Clever

2004-10-20T23:59:59.000Z

467

Beyond Commissioning: The Role of Automation  

SciTech Connect

This article takes a brief look at the benefits of commissioning and describes a vision of the future where most of the objectives of commissioning will be accomplished automatically by capabilities built into the building systems themselves. Commissioning will become an activity that's performed continuously rather than periodically, and only repairs requiring replacement or overhaul of equipment will require manual intervention. The article then identifies some of the technologies that will be needed to realize this vision and ends with a call for all involved in the enterprise of building commissioning and automation to embrace and dedicate themselves to a future of automated commissioning.

Brambley, Michael R.; Katipamula, Srinivas

2005-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Western Area Power Administration Provo River Project Rate Order No. WAPA-149  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Western Area Power Administration Provo River Project Rate Order No. WAPA-149 AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE. ACTION: Notice of Rate Order Concerning a Power Rate Formula. SUMMARY: The Deputy Secretary of Energy confinned and approved Rate Order No. W AP A-149, placing a power rate fOlIDula for the Provo River Project (PRP) of Western Area Power Administration (Western) into effect on an interim basis. The provisional power rate formula will remain in effect on an interim basis until the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) COnfilIDs, approves, and places it into effect on a final basis, or until the power rate formula is replaced by another power rate fOlIDula. DATES: The provisional power rate fonnula will be placed into effect on an interim basis on

469

Microsoft Word - PoRiver Project Schedule - Letter to DOE_042807.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2007 30, 2007 Lawrence Mansueti Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy Rm. 8H-033 1000 Independence Avenue Washington, D.C. 20585 Re: Potomac River Project Outage Schedule Clarification Dear Mr. Mansueti: I am writing to clarify the upcoming outage schedule for the Potomac River project and to explain certain discrepancies that are present in Pepco's most recent communications. 1 The monthly status report submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") on April 16, 2007 shows the upcoming outages for the two additional transmission circuits as May 1, 2007 through May 21, 2007 (Circuit 1) and as May 24, 2007 through June 21, 2007 (Circuit 2). In an e-mail sent by Steve Alexander on April 27, 2007, Pepco reflected the current outage schedule for Circuit 1.

470

National Energy Commission (China) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

China) China) Jump to: navigation, search Name National Energy Commission (China) Place Beijing References National Energy Commission (China)[1] No information has been entered for this organization. Add Organization This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. National Energy Commission (China) is a new, high level, 21 member interagency commission based in Beijing, China, and is responsible for China's new energy law (expected 1/1/2011). [2] National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Environmental Protection (China) See also Government_policy_and_investment_in_clean_energy_(China) Key Facts Members Li Junfeng, National Development and Reform Commission ____, People's Liberation Army References ↑ "National Energy Commission (China)"

471

Renewable Energy Project Funding | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable Energy Project Funding Renewable Energy Project Funding Renewable Energy Project Funding October 16, 2013 - 5:15pm Addthis Renewable Energy Project Funding Planning, Programming & Budgeting Building Design Project Construction Commissioning Operations & Maintenance Federal energy projects require funding to generate results. Agencies trying to stretch their capital budget for a construction project should investigate renewable energy project funding options outside the traditional appropriated budget process. Carefully matching available funding tools with specific project needs can make the difference between a stalled, unfunded renewable energy project and a successful project that generates energy and cost savings. Federal agencies may be able to use tools to finance renewable energy

472

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW: ECONOMIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE ALTERNATIVES FOR AMENDMENT 47 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE GROUNDFISH FISHERY OF THE BERING SEA AND ALEUTIAN

473

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS to the Fisheries Management Plan (FMP) for the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) area, approved on March 4. The structure of the FMP allows certain measures to be changed by regulatory amendments without amending the FMP

474

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/INITIAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/INITIAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS OF A REGULATORY AMENDMENT TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR GROUNDFISH OF THE GULF OF ALASKA and the GROUNDFISH Islands Area (BSAI) are managed under the Fishery Management Plans for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska

475

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area October 2007 Prepared that bycatch may be exacerbated by the current regulatory closure regulations, as much higher salmon bycatch

476

Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission | Open Energy...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Development Commission Jump to: navigation, search Name: Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission Abbreviation: LCDC Place: Portland, Oregon Website: http:...

477

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric Utilities. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric Utilities. Under Title I of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is required to publish a list identifying each electric utility that Title I applies to. [See PURPA SEC. 102(c).] The following list is being released by DOE in August 2006 for review and comment by state public utility commissions. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric

478

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) -List of Covered Electric Utilities - 2006 Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) -List of Covered Electric Utilities - 2006 Under Title I of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is required to publish a list identifying each electric utility that Title I applies to. [See PURPA SEC. 102(c).] The following list is being released by DOE in August 2006 for review and comment by state public utility commissions. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric

479

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. In addition to updating previous information, Revision 1 adds citations from the NRC Inspection Manual and the Improved Standard Technical Specifications. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Ankrum, A.; Nickolaus, J.; Vinther, R.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.; Hammer, J.; Sherfey, L.; Warner, R. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Operations Cost Allocation Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Operations Consolidation Project Operations Consolidation Project Operations Consolidation Project (OCP) Cost Allocation Presentation - September 20, 2011 OCP Cost Allocation Customer Presentation List of Acronyms OCP Cost Allocation Spreadsheets OCP Cost Allocation Customer Presentation - Questions and Answers - September 19 - 20, 2011 Additional Questions and Answers Customer Comments/Questions and Answers: Arizona Municipal Power Users Association Arizona Power Authority Central Arizona Project Colorado River Commission Colorado River Energy Distributors Association City of Gilbert, AZ Irrigation and Electrical Districts Association of Arizona Town of Marana, AZ City of Mesa, AZ Town of Wickenburg, AZ Western's Final Decision Regarding the Long-Term Cost Allocation Methodology for Operations Staff Costs

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory commission project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Preclinical Translation: A Partnership between USC Stevens, CHLA OTT and CSCTSI The SC CTSI Preclinical Translation and Regulatory Support Program (PCT RS) helps biomedical  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

development (2) project opportunityrisk analysis including review of data, markets and IP (3) a project plan.), (4) regulatory requirements for market approval, (5) project planning where project needs are mapped Preclinical Translation and Regulatory Support Program (PCT RS) helps biomedical researchers

Zhou, Chongwu

482

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS Juneau, AK 99802 (907) 586-7228 Abstract: This Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review For Amendment 89 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management

483

Low Dose Radiation Research Program: Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory and Social Impact of the DOE Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory and Social Impact of the DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program. Authors: Antone L.Brooks, Richard J. Bull, Lezlie A. Couch. Institutions: Washington State University Tri-Cities The purpose of this project is to provide scientific, technical, and organizational support to optimize the impact of the DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program. This project will serve as a focal point for collection and dissemination of scientific information from the scientists funded in the Program to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the regulatory agencies, and the public. The project will be responsible for analysis of the scientific information in the broader context of biomedical research and will provide this information to the Office of Biological Research

484

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Workshop at GRC | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Roadmap Workshop at GRC Roadmap Workshop at GRC Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections GRR Project Review and Workshop Register for this Event The Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap project team will be holding a project review and summary workshop in Reno in early October. We are inviting all industry and agency personnel who have participated in this process, and any other interested parties to attend and continue to participate in this roadmapping process. Note that although this workshop is timed to be held during the GRC/GEA Conference and Tradeshow, this workshop is not part of that conference; therefore, conference registration is not required to attend the Regulatory Roadmapping workshop. From 10 AM to noon, come and view the permitting roadmaps from the 8 states

485

Chapter 11 - Regulatory and Political Risks  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

All major projects have political aspects (11.2). The Project Company may therefore be subject to political risks relating to the projects presence in a particular country and its relationship with the Host Government, rather than to the more general commercial and macro-economic risk aspects of the project covered in Chapter 9 and Chapter 10. These political risks are discussed in detail in this chapter. There are two main areas of risk relating to government actions: firstly regulatory or change in law risks (11.3), which affect all projects to some extent, and secondly investment risks (11.4), which mainly affect cross-border project investments, primarily in developing countries. Linked to the latter are quasi-political risks, which relate to government taking indirect action against the project (11.5). This chapter also deals with the particular issues arising from sub-sovereign risks i.e. where the Offtaker/Contracting Authority is a state or local government instead of the central government (11.6). Finally the terms for a Government Support Agreement, which may help to deal with the issues covered in 11.311.6, are described (11.7). Political-risk insurance may be available to cover these risks (11.8).

E.R. Yescombe

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, improve air quality, and stimulate the sustainable production and use of biofuels within California projects submitted under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act cost-share grant solicitation

487

Retro-Commissioning (RCx) Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

'''''Note: Program Year 5 is now in progress. Project implementation must begin by May 31, 2013. All measures must be implemented by March 31, 2014. '''''...

488

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS: This Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA For Amendments to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

489

FPCC Regulatory Barriers Submittal | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Barriers Submittal FPCC Regulatory Barriers Submittal The Federal Performance Contracting Coalition (FPCC) appreciates the opportunity to comment on reducing regulatory...

490

California Energy Commission STAFF REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

in this addendum is: · AE Advanced Fuels Keyes, Inc.'s, "Integrated Cellulose/Starch Ethanol Pre- Development, Inc.'s, "Integrated Cellulose/ Starch Ethanol Pre-Development Acceleration Project." Project Description AE Advanced Fuels Keyes (AEAFK) will deploy its patent-pending cellulosic ethanol technology

491

Calculation Method for the Projection of Future Spent Nuclear Fuel Discharges  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the calculation method developed for the projection of future utility spent nuclear fuel (SNF) discharges in regard to their timing, quantity, burnup, and initial enrichment. This projection method complements the utility-supplied RW-859 data on historic discharges and short-term projections of SNF discharges by providing long-term projections that complete the total life cycle of discharges for each of the current U.S. nuclear power reactors. The method was initially developed in mid-1999 to update the SNF discharge projection associated with the 1995 RW-859 utility survey (CRWMS M&O 1996). and was further developed as described in Rev. 00 of this report (CRWMS M&O 2001a). Primary input to the projection of SNF discharges is the utility projection of the next five discharges from each nuclear unit, which is provided via the revised final version of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) 1998 RW-859 utility survey (EIA 2000a). The projection calculation method is implemented via a set of Excel 97 spreadsheets. These calculations provide the interface between receipt of the utility five-discharge projections that are provided in the RW-859 survey, and the delivery of projected life-cycle SNF discharge quantities and characteristics in the format requisite for performing logistics analysis to support design of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS). Calculation method improvements described in this report include the addition of a reactor-specific maximum enrichment-based discharge burnup limit. This limit is the consequence of the enrichment limit, currently 5 percent. which is imposed as a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) license condition on nuclear fuel fabrication plants. In addition, the calculation method now includes the capability for projecting future nuclear plant power upratings, consistent with many such recent plant uprates and the prospect of additional future uprates. Finally. this report summarizes the results of the 2002 Reference SNF Discharge Projection.

B. McLeod

2002-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

492

Notices ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION Agency Information Collection  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23 Federal Register 23 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 180 / Friday, September 16, 2011 / Notices ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Election Assistance Commission's Voting System Test Laboratory Program Manual, Version 1.0 AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). ACTION: Notice; comment request. SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on EAC's request to renew an existing information collection, EAC's Voting System Test Laboratory Program Manual, Version

493

Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities (South Carolina) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities (South Carolina) Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities (South Carolina) Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities (South Carolina) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Home Weatherization Solar Wind Program Info State South Carolina Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Regional Districts, Commissions, and Authorities

494

Commission on Energy Efficiency Standards and Practices  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Final Report to the Governor Final Report to the Governor and the Iowa General Assembly Submitted in Compliance with Iowa Code Section 103A.27 January1, 2011 Commission on Energy Efficiency Standards and Practices Commission on Energy Efficiency Standards and Practices 2 Table of Contents Commission Members page 3 Executive Summary page 4 Summary of Recommendations page 5 Legislative Overview page 12 Profile on Iowa's Energy Usage page 14 Commission Proceedings page 15 Recommendations Energy Code Adoption & Compliance page 20 Financing & Incentives page 25 Training and Education page 29 Licensing and Certification page 31 Additional Energy Efficiency Recommendations page 32

495

Best Practices in Existing Building Commissioning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentation covers the Best Practices in Existing Building Commissioning and is given at the Spring 2010 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting in Rapid City, South Dakota.

496

PP-54 Ontario Hydro Electric Power Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presidential Permit authorizing Ontario Hydro Electric Power Commission to construct, operate, and maintain electric transmission facilities at the U.S. - Canada Border.

497

United States Atomic Energy Commission formed  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

formed As the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission failed to come to grips with the growing nuclear weapons problem, the United States worked to establish its own formal...

498

A History of the Atomic Energy Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A History of the Atomic Energy Commission - written by Alice L. BuckWashington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, July 1983.41 pp.

499

The Fenno-Skan HVDC link commissioning  

SciTech Connect

The commissioning of the Fenno-Skan HVDC link between Finland and Sweden, with the longest submarine dc cable in the world, is described. The main pre-commissioning activities, important for an efficient commissioning, are discussed together with time schedules and suitable organization forms. The procedures to test special control features, such as subsynchronous oscillation (SSO) damping control are presented. The full scale network interaction tests which are an important part of the commissioning are also discussed. These tests succeeded very well and provided a lot of information about the system behavior for future operation and planning purposes.

Nyman, A. (Swedish State Power Board, Vaellingby (Sweden)); Jaeaeskelaeinen, K.; Vaitomaa, M. (Imatran Voima OY, Vantaa (Finland)); Jansson, B.; Danielsson, K.G. (ABB Power Systems, Ludvika (Sweden))

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

500

Example Retro-Commissioning Statement of Work  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

steps. Review Existing Systems & Documentation o Attending meetings through out the process including a retro-commissioning kick-off meeting in preparation for the site...