Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Re: Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations Re: Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations Comments from Edison Electric Institute on DOE's...

2

NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Burden RFI NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments...

3

DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is now interested in receiving comment on the suggestions and comments received from outside parties. Those comments and suggestions are posted on the Office of the General Counsel website: Retrospective Review of Regulations. On January 31, 2011, the Department took two steps to launch its

4

Regulatory Burden RFI: Revitalization of DOE's Role as a Regulatory Watchdog  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CREs) attached comments highlighting four issues:

5

DOE Reg. Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 4, 2012 January 4, 2012 Page 1 January 4, 2012 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI had submitted comments on March 21, 2011 in response to the previous Request for Information (RFI) issued by DOE in February of 2011. We appreciate DOE's commitment to maintaining a plan for regular, periodic review of its existing regulations and reporting

6

DOE Reg. Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 21, 2011 March 21, 2011 Page 1 March 21, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011 requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI is the trade association representing manufacturers of heating, cooling, water heating, and commercial refrigeration equipment. More than 300 members strong, AHRI is an internationally recognized advocate for the industry, and develops standards for and certifies the performance of

7

AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). AHAM CommentsDOE Reg Review Sept 2012FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg....

8

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is again asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 5-29-12.pdf More Documents & Publications Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798

9

Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Hussmann manufacturer of commercial refrigeration products, appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's Request for Comments on the topic of the Regulatory...

10

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reducing Regulatory Burden  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Billing Code 6450 01-P Billing Code 6450 01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review," issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The purpose of DOE's review is to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. DATES: Written comments and information are requested on or before 45 days after

11

Regulatory Burden RFI - Hussmann Corporation Response  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulatory Burden RFI - Hussmann Corporation Response Regulatory Burden RFI - Hussmann Corporation Response January 3, 2012 Below are the list of questions with answers from the December 5 RFI: (1) How can the Department best promote meaningful periodic reviews of its existing rules and how can it best identify those rules that might be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed? DOE should maintain a list of all manufacturers impacted by legislation/rules and make sure these manufacturers are notified of all rule changes. A full review cycle should be done periodically and provide adequate time for ALL manufacturers to respond. (2) What factors should the agency consider in selecting and prioritizing rules and reporting requirements for review? Cost (initial and maintenance) should be considered as well as return on investment. Also,

12

Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Request for information on reducing regulatory burden, E.O. 13563...

13

FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company...

14

NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reducing Regulatory Burden NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments...

15

Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory Burden  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory Burden RFI (Federal Register August 8, 2012) Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory Burden RFI (Federal Register August 8, 2012) On behalf of the Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association, I am providing the following comments and information in response to DOE's request. The Association represents residential builders, developers and associated professionals and service firms. Final Letter to DOE Regulatory Burden 9_7_2012.pdf More Documents & Publications National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) Ex Parte Memorandum Energy Storage Activities in the United States Electricity Grid. May 2011 Frederick County (Maryland) Department of Permits and Inspections (FCDPI

16

Regulatory Burden RFI from AHRI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) notice in the December 5, 2011 Federal...

17

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI). In the RFI, the Department of Energy (DOE) is asking for comments on ways to streamline its regulations and to eliminate unnecessary ones, so as to make the regulations less burdensome and more effective. Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 9-7-12.pdf More Documents & Publications Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011)

18

Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Fifth RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy(Department or DOE) is...

19

Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 15. 2011 April 15. 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Via Email: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Subject: Reducing Regulatory Burden, Request for Information, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 23, February 3, 2011 Dear Mr. Cohen: The American Gas Association (AGA) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the subject Department of Energy ("the Department") Request for Information (RFI) seeking comment and information to assist it in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether such regulations should be modified or repealed pursuant to Executive Order 13563 ("Improving

20

DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report January 2014 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 2014 FINAL More Documents & Publications DOE...

22

Regulatory Burden RFI from Bodine Electric Company | Department...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

from Bodine Electric Company Regulatory Burden RFI from Bodine Electric Company The following is a response from Bodine Electric Company on unnecessarily burdensome regulations...

23

Comments on reducing regulatory burden | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces, and accessories Comments on reducing regulatory burden More...

24

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

- December 18, 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE EO 13563 December 2012 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts...

25

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 15, 2013 February 15, 2013 Agency/ Sub- agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/GC N/A Request for information on reducing regulatory burden DOE is continually engaging in review of its rules to determine whether there are burdens on the public that can be avoided by amending or rescinding existing requirements. To that end, while DOE is always open to receiving information about the impact of its regulations, it published this RFI to solicit public input. August 8, 2012 (77 FR 47328) This information solicitation is expected

26

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting...

27

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting...

28

Regulatory Burden RFI Executive Order 13563 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

needed relief from regulatory burden. This past year we've invested 250,000 in energy testing. Those resources could have been used to develop new and better products. We expect...

29

DOE Com Reg Burden RFI 9-7-12.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 7, 2012 September 7, 2012 Page 1 September 7, 2012 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the August 8, 2012 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. AHRI most recently submitted comments on January 4, 2012 in response to the previous Request for Information (RFI) issued by DOE in December of 2011. We note that the May 2012 Retrospective Review Plan Report does include several items addressing issues noted in our

30

CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: 1. DOE's Regulatory Coordination & Harmonization Responsibilities; 2. The Cumulative Costs of Regulations; 3. Retrospective Review of Regulations; and 4. Stakeholder Participation. DOE REGULATORY COORDINATION & HARMONIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES

31

Reducing Regulatory Burden - EO 13563 Retrospective Review |...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy: Recommendations to the NRC Committee on Research...

32

The Department of Energy's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy's Department of Energy's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden Submitted on June 18, 2012 On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council and our more than 1.3 million members and online activists, we submit the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden. (77 Federal Register 28518, May 15, 2012) NRDC has spent decades working to build and improve the Department of Energy's ("DOE") federal appliance standards programs because of the important energy, environmental, and consumer benefits of appliance

33

DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE 13563 and ICR Report - Final.pdf...

34

Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Request for Information on reducing...

35

NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) entitled, Reducing Regulatory...

36

Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is again...

37

Microsoft Word - NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, Final.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ 1615 M Street, NW, Suite 800 Tel 202/822-0950 Washington, DC 20036 Fax 202/822-0955 http://www.naesco.org May 29, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Sir or Madam: The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) entitled, "Reducing Regulatory Burden," published in the Federal Register on May 15, 2012.

38

7/24/2014 DOE Natural Gas Regulatory...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

242014 DOE Natural Gas Regulatory E-filing Application https:app.fossil.energy.govappfergasApplicationAction.go 12 Basic Information Natural Gas Regulatory E-filing...

39

DOE Ex Parte Memorandum- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is submitting this memorandum pursuant to the Department of Energys (DOE) Guidance on Ex Parte Communications.

40

DOE Review of Regulations- Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

firms. Final Letter to DOE Regulatory Burden 972012.pdf More Documents & Publications Building America Best Practices Series Volume 16: 40% Whole-House Energy Savings in the...

42

Microsoft Word - MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review 5-29-2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

111 Wilson Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703.558.0400 Fax: 703.558.0401 111 Wilson Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703.558.0400 Fax: 703.558.0401 http://www.manufacturedhousing.org info@mfghome.org U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program Mailstop EE-2J 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585-1585 May 29, 2012 Reference: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed as a part of its implementation of Executive Order

43

Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) Regulatory Burden RFI  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) notice in the August 8, 2012 Federal Register...

44

Fact Sheet: DOE/National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissione...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

DOENational Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Natural Gas Infrastructure Modernization Partnership Fact Sheet: DOENational Association of Regulatory Utility...

45

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input. Comments relevant to the following two sections of the RFI: "Long Term Issues: Managing a Grid with High Penetration of New Technologies" and "Reliability and Cyber-Security," US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Progress Energy draft regarding Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and

46

Final Letter to DOE Regulatory Burden 9_7_2012.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE STEVE NARDELLA President (Winchester Homes Inc.) RICK BAILEY Vice President/Calvert Co. (Marrick Properties) DOUG MEEKER Vice President/Charles Co. (Elm Street Development) ROBERT J. SPALDING Vice President/Mont. Co. (Miller & Smith Homes) HILLARY P.COLT Vice President/Prince George's Co. (Konterra) MIKE MUMMAUGH Vice President/St. Mary's Co. (Paragon Properties Inc.) BRIAN "A.J." JACKSON Vice President/Washington DC (EYA, LLC) FRANK BOSSONG, IV, P.E Associate Vice President (Rodgers Consulting Inc.) CLARK WAGNER Treasurer (Bozzuto Homes) DAVE LUNDEN Vice President, State Legis./Secretary (Timberlake Homes, Inc.) ROBERT R. HARRIS Life Director (Lerch, Early & Brewer Chtd.) MARTY MITCHELL Immediate Past President

47

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rocky Flats Regulatory Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Documents Regulatory Documents Rocky Flats Site, Colorado Regulatory Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Notification that GS01 is no longer an RFLMA Point of Compliance (POC) Third Five-Year Review Report for the Rocky Flats Site Rocky Flats Legacy Management Agreement Environmental Covenant, November 14, 2011 Corrective Action Decision/Record of Decision Amendment for Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE) Central Operable Unit Proposed Plan for the Rocky Flats CAD/ROD Amendment (June 2011) Second Five-Year Review Report for the Rocky Flats Site Corrective Action Decision/Record of Decision for Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE) Peripheral Operable Unit and Central Operable Unit Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Proposed Plan Present Landfill Monitoring and Maintenance Plan

48

Does the management of regulatory compliance and occupational risk have an impact on safety culture?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Does the management of regulatory compliance and occupational risk have an impact on safety culture of safety culture has progressively taken hold in organizations. The idea has numerous benefits and can the nature and strength of relationships between safety culture and two explanatory variables; namely

Boyer, Edmond

49

Fact Sheet: DOE/National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Natural Gas Infrastructure Modernization Partnership  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

In one of a series of actions to help modernize the nations natural gas transmission and distribution systems and reduce methane emissions, DOE will work with the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) to encourage investments in infrastructure modernization to enhance pipeline safety, efficiency and deliverability.

50

Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework DOE's Nuclear Safety Enabling Legislation Regulatory Enforcement & Oversight Regulatory Governance Atomic Energy Act 1946...

51

@ GW Regulatory Studies Center | www.RegulatoryStudies.gwu.edu | Follow us @RegStudies DOE's Proposed Commercial Refrigeration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

global greenhouse gas emissions, and reduce commercial customers' energy bills long-term. As DOE explains efficiency standards. First, energy use related to commercial refrigeration results in some greenhouse gas emissions. Because the social cost of greenhouse gas emissions may not be fully represented in the price

Schmitt, William R.

52

Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council and our more than 1.3 million members and online activists, we submit the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden. Comments_of_the_NRD Council_RRB_RFI_June2012.pdf More Documents & Publications Natural Resources Defense Council Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Design Standards for New Federal Buildings; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules

53

Substate Federalism and Fracking Policies: Does State Regulatory Authority Trump Local Land Use Autonomy?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

While environmentalists and some local officials have raised questions about prospective environmental impacts from fracking operations such as the contamination of water supplies or deteriorating air quality at production sites, natural gas companies have been exempted from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, except when diesel is used as a fracking fluid. ... How did city and county officials respond to these challenges of a rapidly changing regulatory environment? ... Democratic legislators did not succeed in their efforts to alter two particularly controversial features of the proposed law; that is, the decision to enact an impact fee on oil and gas companies and the imposition of strict limits on the ability of local governments to regulate fracking. ...

Charles Davis

2014-03-03T23:59:59.000Z

54

Fourth RFI_Comment on Regulatory Review.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

47328 47328 Vol. 77, No. 153 Wednesday, August 8, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The purpose of DOE's review is to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its

55

Sample Form DOE NRC 740M  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

CONCISE NOTE CONCISE NOTE DOE/NRC FORM 740M (6-2008) MANDATORY DATA COLLECTION AUTHORIZED BY 10 CFR 30, 40, 50, 70, 72, 74, 75, 150, Public Laws 83-703, 93-438, 95-91 Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 45 minutes. This information is required to satisfy the provisions of the US/IAEA Safeguards Agreement. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the Records and FOIA Privacy Services Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by internet e-mail to infocollects@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0057), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not

56

Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 5-29-12.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29, 2012 29, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel, Room 6A245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted via e-mail to: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Dear DOE staff: The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is again asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. Though DOE has just granted an extension of the comment deadline in today's Federal Register from today to June 19, 2012, we are filing these comments now so DOE can have the benefit of our views.

57

Regulatory Reduction RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 6123, February 3, 2011 | Department  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Reduction RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 6123, February 3, 2011 Regulatory Reduction RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 6123, February 3, 2011 Regulatory Reduction RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 6123, February 3, 2011 This is in reply to comments filed by the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) urging the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to repeal its energy conservation standards for direct heating equipment as applied to decorative vented gas fireplaces. I support HPBA's comments because I do not believe that decorative vented gas fireplaces were ever meant to be included under the term "direct heating equipment" as that term appears in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). Regulatory Reduction RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 6123, February 3, 2011 More Documents & Publications .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden

58

Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework DOE's Nuclear Safety Enabling Legislation Regulatory Enforcement & Oversight Regulatory Governance Atomic Energy Act 1946 Atomic Energy Act 1954 Energy Reorganization Act 1974 DOE Act 1977 Authority and responsibility to regulate nuclear safety at DOE facilities 10 CFR 830 10 CFR 835 10 CFR 820 Regulatory Implementation Nuclear Safety Radiological Safety Procedural Rules ISMS-QA; Operating Experience; Metrics and Analysis Cross Cutting DOE Directives & Manuals DOE Standards Central Technical Authorities (CTA) Office of Health, Safety, and Security (HSS) Line Management SSO/ FAC Reps 48 CFR 970 48 CFR 952 Federal Acquisition Regulations External Oversight *Defense Nuclear Facility

59

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers. Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 More Documents & Publications FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS

60

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent some of the largest utility companies in the Western United States, serving over 35 million customers. Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 More Documents & Publications FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

OMB Burden Disclosure Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

71.1 OMB Control Number 71.1 OMB Control Number (09/2012) (Classification) OMB Burden Disclosure Statement 1910-1800 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 (minutes) per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching exist ing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comme nts regarding this estimate or any other aspect of this information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Information, Records, and Resource Management, MA-41-GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1800), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20874-1290; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1800),Washington, DC 20503.

62

Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 2-3-12.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 3, 2012 February 3, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel, Room 6A245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted via e-mail to: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) Dear DOE staff: The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. I. EEI Has a Direct Interest in This Proceeding EEI is the association of shareholder-owned electric utilities in the United States, international affiliates, and industry associates worldwide. Our U.S. members serve 95

63

AHAM Comments_DOE Reg Review Sept 2012_FINAL.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 7, 2012 September 7, 2012 By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). AHAM represents manufacturers of major, portable and floor care home appliances, and suppliers to the industry. AHAM's more than 150 members employ tens of thousands of people in the U.S. and produce more than 95% of the household appliances shipped for sale within the

64

Proceedings of the tenth annual DOE low-level waste management conference: Session 1: Institutional and regulatory issues  

SciTech Connect

This document contains eleven papers on various aspects of low-level radioactive waste regulation. Topics include: EPA environmental standards; international exemption principles; the concept of below regulatory concern; envirocare activities in Utah; mixed waste; FUSRAP and the Superfund; and a review of various incentive programs. Individual papers are processed separately for the data base. (TEM)

Not Available

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

65

DOE/EIS-0075-SA-02: Operational and Engineering Modifications and Regulatory Review Supplemental Analysis of Site-Specific and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements (September 2009)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SPR-EIS-0075-SA-02 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF SITE-SPECIFIC AND PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS: OPERATIONAL AND ENGINEERING MODIFICATIONS, AND REGULATORY REVIEW U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve 900 Commerce Road East New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 September 2009 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Page 3 of 51 Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office under Contract No. DE-AC96-03PO92207 DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company 850 South Clearview Parkway New Orleans, Louisiana 70123 Page 4 of 51 DOE/SPR/EIS-0075-SA02 Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 6

66

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters | Department  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters GC-52 provides legal advice to DOE regarding Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulatory and licensing matters of interest to DOE, either as an NRC license applicant or in connection with related authorities and responsibilities of DOE and NRC on nuclear material, nuclear waste, and nuclear nonproliferation matters. GC-52 attorneys provide advice and support on a variety of NRC matters including regulation and licensing of DOE independent spent fuel storage facilities (ISFSIs) and a mixed-oxide fuel fabrication facility, consultation with NRC on certain DOE waste determinations, and imports and exports of nuclear materials and radioactive sealed sources.

67

Does  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

68

March 7, 2012, USW Health Safety and Environment Conference Presentations - DOE Worker Safety and Health Regulatory Enforcement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Worker Safety and Health Worker Safety and Health Regulatory Enforcement Kevin Dressman Director, Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement (HS-41) Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy http://www.hss.energy.gov/enforce/ USW Health, Safety and Environment Conference HSS Workshop March 7, 2012 2 Office of Health, Safety and Security Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer HS-10 HS-20 HS-70 HS-80 HS-90 HS-1.1 HS-1 HS-11 HS-12 HS-13 HS-14 HS-21 HS-22 HS-23 HS-24 HS-81 HS-82 HS-83 HS-91 HS-92 HS-93 HS-94 Office of Departmental Representative to DNFSB and Liaison Outreach Office of Communications and Congressional Affairs Chief Medical Officer Office of Health and Safety Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support,

69

DOE F  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

420.2 420.2 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Records Management Division, IM-11 GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20585; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1000), Washington, DC 20503. U.S. Department of Energy Personal Property Loan Agreement DOE-PMR 109-1.5103 1. CONTROL

70

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

71

DOE_05_18_2011.pdf | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012...

72

Definition: Burden | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Burden Burden Jump to: navigation, search Dictionary.png Burden Operation of the Bulk Electric System that violates or is expected to violate a System Operating Limit or Interconnection Reliability Operating Limit in the Interconnection, or that violates any other NERC, Regional Reliability Organization, or local operating reliability standards or criteria.[1] View on Wikipedia Wikipedia Definition Related Terms Bulk Electric System, System, Interconnection, sustainability References ↑ Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards An inl LikeLike UnlikeLike You like this.Sign Up to see what your friends like. ine Glossary Definition Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Definition:Burden&oldid=493023" Categories: Definitions ISGAN Definitions

73

Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 9-7-12.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2012 7, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel, Room 6A245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted via e-mail to: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012) Dear DOE staff: The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI). In the RFI, the Department of Energy (DOE) is asking for comments on ways to streamline its regulations and to eliminate unnecessary ones, so as to make the regulations less burdensome and more effective. EEI already has filed the attached two sets of comments earlier this year offering such recommendations, to which DOE has not yet responded. We wish to reiterate them.

74

Regulatory Burden RFI [76 FR 75798] | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces and accessories therefore. --- Ingersoll Rand appreciates the...

75

The economic burden of sunscreen usage  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Economic Burden of Sunscreen Usage Ritika Johal 1 , Michaelprice per ounce. Sunscreen Usage To estimate the daily use

Johal, Ritika; Leo, Michael S; Ma, Brian; Sivamani, Raja K

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on AddThis.com... Home About Covered Fleets Compliance Methods Alternative Fuel Petitions Resources The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Vehicle Technologies Office manages

77

O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS database\DOE\2011\DOE-HQ-2011-0014 - Daniel Cohen - GC\Comments from FDMS\Dan Manole DRAFT-0004.html  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14%20-%20Daniel%20Cohen%20-%20GC/Comments%20from%20FDMS/Dan%20Manole%20DRAFT-0004.html[3/23/2011 2:21:55 PM] 14%20-%20Daniel%20Cohen%20-%20GC/Comments%20from%20FDMS/Dan%20Manole%20DRAFT-0004.html[3/23/2011 2:21:55 PM] PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: March 23, 2011 Received: March 21, 2011 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 80c0d039 Comments Due: April 04, 2011 Submission Type: Web Docket: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Reducing Regulatory Burden Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden Document: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-DRAFT-0004 Comment on FR Doc # 2011-02368 Submitter Information Name: Dan Manole Address: 2700 Crestridge Court N/A Suwanee, GA, 30024 Email: dan_manole@irco.com Phone: 770-291-2378 Submitter's Representative: Dan Manole Organization: Hussmann General Comment See attached file(s) Attachments DOE-HQ-2011-0014-DRAFT-0004.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2011-02368 From: Dan Manole, Regulatory Compliance Manager, Hussmann Corporation

78

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Jay Morrison Jay Morrison Vice President, Regulatory Issues National Rural Electric Cooperative Association jay.morrison@nreca.coop Susan Kelly General Counsel, Senior Vice President American Public Power Association skelly@publicpower.org  DG penetration rates are increasing rapidly  Careful selection of business model can maximize value for all participants by:  Maximizing access to government incentives  Maximize access to all available value streams for the developer, customer, and utility  Minimize regulatory burdens for all parties  Provide win-win-win solution 2  What size generator?  What fuel or energy source? Does it include storage?  Who pays the up-front cost of the generator?  Who owns the generator?  Who operates the generator?

79

Regulatory Highlights  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

It also described plans relating to the need to remove reference to wet chemical tests for heavy metals from all individual monographs. ... This was reviewed in detail in the previous regulatory review. ... A concept paper and business plan have been developed for an ICH guideline focused on technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle management. ...

Andrew Teasdale

2014-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

80

DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report May 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 May2012 ReportDOE525.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

DOE 13563 and ICR Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3563 and ICR Report DOE 13563 and ICR Report DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report, January 14, 2013 DOE 13563 and ICR Report 21513 FINAL.pdf More Documents &...

82

index | netl.doe.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of energy-related, multi-disciplinary analyses to help guide and evaluate DOE's Clean Coal Research Program and inform related policy and regulatory decisions. NETL's...

83

Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Processes Regulatory Processes Beginning with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, Congress has enacted a series of laws establishing federal appliance and equipment standards and the Department of Energy's (DOE) authority to develop, amend, and implement standards. To implement these laws, the Appliance and Equipment Standards program manages the regulatory processes described below. Standards Development and Revision Standards for a given product may be mandated by Congress or established by DOE pursuant to statutory authority. Standards established by DOE are developed through a multi-step rulemaking process that includes public participation. Test Procedure Development and Revision Most standards rulemakings are accompanied by a concurrent test procedure rulemaking. Test procedures detail how manufacturers must test their products to certify that they comply with the applicable energy conservation standards. (42 U.S.C. 6293; 6314) DOE also uses the test procedures to determine compliance with the applicable standards. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s))

84

Regulatory Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. The Department of Energy is not a regulatory agency; however it does self-regulate its own radioactive waste. DOE is also affected by a variety of statutes, legislation, regulations, directives and guidance. Many of the current compliance-related actions revolve around waste and material disposition. These include National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Impact Statements and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Records of Decision. Links, below,

85

Safety and Health Regulatory and Policy Response Line  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Safety and Health Regulatory and Policy Response Line is a service that responds to questions from DOE, DOE contractor, and DOE subcontractor employees regarding applicability of worker safety and health standards and directives.

86

Regulatory facility guide for Ohio  

SciTech Connect

The Regulatory Facility Guide (RFG) has been developed for the DOE and contractor facilities located in the state of Ohio. It provides detailed compilations of international, federal, and state transportation-related regulations applicable to shipments originating at destined to Ohio facilities. This RFG was developed as an additional resource tool for use both by traffic managers who must ensure that transportation operations are in full compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements and by oversight personnel who must verify compliance activities.

Anderson, S.S.; Bock, R.E.; Francis, M.W.; Gove, R.M.; Johnson, P.E.; Kovac, F.M.; Mynatt, J.O. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Rymer, A.C. [Transportation Consulting Services, Knoxville, TN (United States)

1994-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

87

Vehicle Technologies Office: EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Vehicle Technologies Office manages several Energy Policy Act (EPAct) transportation regulatory activities that aim to reduce U.S. petroleum consumption by building a core market for alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs). EPAct directed DOE to develop the Alternative Fuel Transportation Program to manage regulatory activities, including the State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Program, which requires covered fleets to reduce petroleum consumption through one of two compliance methods. Features Discover how National Grid meets EPAct requirements Read the latest newsletter Learn about Alternative Compliance Quick Links Standard Compliance Reporting Standard Compliance Alternative Compliance

88

Regulatory Tools  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Tools Regulatory Tools Home CRA - 2004 Final Recertification Decision CRA Comments & Responses CCA - 1996 CRA CARDs & TSDs CCA CARDs & TSDs Regulatory Tools Title 40 CFR Part 191 Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes. Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Re-Certification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the 40 CFR Part 191 Disposal Regulations. Part I Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the Disposal Regulations; Alternative Provisions; Proposed Rule. Friday August 9, 2002. Part II Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the Disposal Regulations: Certification Decision; Final Rule. May 18, 1998. Part III

89

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, October 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, August 1991  

SciTech Connect

This Environmental Regulatory Update Table (August 1991) provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M., Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, September 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, November 1991  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

93

Environmental regulatory update table, July 1991  

SciTech Connect

This Environmental Regulatory Update Table (July 1991) provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, November 1990  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Hawkins, G.T.; Houlberg, L.M.; Noghrei-Nikbakht, P.A.; Salk, M.S.

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

95

O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS database\DOE\2011\DOE-HQ-2011-0014 - Daniel Cohen - GC\Comments from FDMS\Charles W Adams DRAFT-0005.html  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

%20Daniel%20Cohen%20-%20GC/Comments%20from%20FDMS/Charles%20W%20Adams%20DRAFT-0005.html[3/23/2011 2:17:13 PM] %20Daniel%20Cohen%20-%20GC/Comments%20from%20FDMS/Charles%20W%20Adams%20DRAFT-0005.html[3/23/2011 2:17:13 PM] PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: March 23, 2011 Received: March 21, 2011 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 80c0d05f Comments Due: April 04, 2011 Submission Type: Web Docket: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Reducing Regulatory Burden Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden Document: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-DRAFT-0005 Comment on FR Doc # 2011-02368 Submitter Information Name: Charles W Adams Address: A.O. Smith Corporation 11270 W. PARK PLACE MILWAUKEE, WI, 53224 Email: cadams@aosmith.com Phone: 414-359-4274 Organization: A.O. Smith Corporation General Comment I am commenting on behalf of A.O. Smith Water Products Company, the largest manufacturer of residential and commercial water heaters in the USA. We are members of the Air-conditioning,

96

Negotiating equity for management of DOE wastes  

SciTech Connect

One important factor frustrating optimal management of Department of Energy (DOE)-complex wastes is the inability to use licensed and permitted facilities systematically. Achieving the goal of optimal use of DOE`s waste management facilities is politically problematic for two reasons. First, no locale wants to bear a disproportionate burden from DOE wastes. Second, the burden imposed by additional wastes transported from one site to another is difficult to characterize. To develop a viable framework for equitably distributing these burdens while achieving efficient use of all DOE waste management facilities, several implementation and equity issues must be addressed and resolved. This paper discusses stakeholder and equity issues and proposes a framework for joint research and action that could facilitate equity negotiations among stakeholder and move toward a more optimal use of DOE`s waste management capabilities.

Carnes, S.A.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

97

Regulatory and Permitting Information Desktop Toolkit (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect

Overview of DOE's Regulatory and Permitting Information Desktop (RAPID) Toolkit project, providing information on where to go to view documents and who to contact to get involved.

Young, K.

2014-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 11:30AM to 1:00PM MDT The purpose of this webinar is to educate NRECA and APPA members, Tribes, and federal energy managers about a few of the regulatory issues that should be considered in developing business plans for distributed generation projects. This webinar is sponsored by the DOE Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs, DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Tribal Energy Program, Western Area Power Administration, DOE Federal Energy Management Program, DOE Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, and the American Public Power

99

KWOC (Key-Word-Out-of-Context) Index of US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide Series  

SciTech Connect

To meet the objectives of the program funded by the Department of Energy (DOE)-Nuclear Energy (NE) Technology Support Programs, the Performance Assurance Project Office (PAPO) administers a Performance Assurance Information Program that collects, compiles, and distributes program-related information, reports, and publications for the benefit of the DOE-NE program participants. THE KWOC Index of US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide Series'' is prepared as an aid in searching for specific topics in the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide Series.

Jennings, S.D.

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

Regulatory Processes  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Beginning with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, Congress has enacted a series of laws establishing federal appliance and equipment standards and the Department of Energy's (DOE)...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

DOE F 1324.10  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 (06-96) 2. 1. OMB Control No. 1910-1700 DOE Contractor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RECORDS INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULE (RIDS) OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1-1/2 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Office of Information Management, Records Management Team, HR-424, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20874-1290; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1700), Washington, DC 20503.

102

DOE F 5639.3  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5639.3 5639.3 (12-93) (Formerly DOE F 5630.13) All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Control No. 1910-1800 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REPORT OF SECURITY INCIDENT/INFRACTION OMB BURDEN DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 25 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Office of Information Resources Management Policy, Plans, and Oversight, Records Management Division, HR-422 - GTN, Paperwork Reduction

103

Regulatory Drivers | netl.doe.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule which requires reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG) data and other relevant information from large sources and suppliers in the United...

104

Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Cooperation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Cooperation to Advance Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Increase Cooperation to Advance Global Nuclear Energy Partnership July 17, 2007 - 2:55pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) expanded cooperation for President Bush's Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that was signed on Friday by DOE's GNEP Deputy Program Manager Paul Lisowski and NRC Executive Director for Operations Luis Reyes. The MOU establishes the foundation for increased cooperation between DOE and NRC on technological research and engineering studies and marks another important milestone

105

United States-Mexico electricity transfers: Of alien electrons and the migration of undocumented environmental burdens  

SciTech Connect

This article intends to set forth the necessity for reform in the United States policy and procedures regarding approval of power transfers between the United States and Mexico. In order to do this, the article will review the history of electrical power transfers between the United States and Mexico (Part II), analyze recent regulatory changes in the United States and Mexico which may result in increased power exports to Mexico (Part III), evaluate the extent to which the present permit and authorization system in the United States considers the increased environmental burden of such power transfers (Part IV), and, where appropriate, propose some procedural and policy reforms that could take into account the environmental burdens generated by the production of power destined for transfer across the United States-Mexico border (Part V).

Gandara, A. [Univ. of California, Davis, CA (United States)

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Acceptable Risks and Burdens to Others than the Participant  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Chapter 15 addresses what level of risk and burdens it is acceptable to expose others than the participant to,...

Sigmund Simonsen

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

DOE standard: Radiological control  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed this Standard to assist line managers in meeting their responsibilities for implementing occupational radiological control programs. DOE has established regulatory requirements for occupational radiation protection in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 835 (10 CFR 835), ``Occupational Radiation Protection``. Failure to comply with these requirements may lead to appropriate enforcement actions as authorized under the Price Anderson Act Amendments (PAAA). While this Standard does not establish requirements, it does restate, paraphrase, or cite many (but not all) of the requirements of 10 CFR 835 and related documents (e.g., occupational safety and health, hazardous materials transportation, and environmental protection standards). Because of the wide range of activities undertaken by DOE and the varying requirements affecting these activities, DOE does not believe that it would be practical or useful to identify and reproduce the entire range of health and safety requirements in this Standard and therefore has not done so. In all cases, DOE cautions the user to review any underlying regulatory and contractual requirements and the primary guidance documents in their original context to ensure that the site program is adequate to ensure continuing compliance with the applicable requirements. To assist its operating entities in achieving and maintaining compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835, DOE has established its primary regulatory guidance in the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides. This Standard supplements the DOE G 441.1 series of Guides and serves as a secondary source of guidance for achieving compliance with 10 CFR 835.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Regulatory Oversight Program, July 1, 1993--March 3, 1997. Volume 2: Appendices  

SciTech Connect

On July, 1993, a Regulatory Oversight (RO) organization was established within the US DOE, Oak Ridge Operations to provide regulatory oversight of the DOE uranium enrichment facilities leased to the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC). The purpose of the OR program was to ensure continued plant safety, safeguards and security while the plants were transitioned to regulatory oversight by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Volume 2 contains copies of the documents which established the relationship between NRC, DOE, USEC, and DOL (Dept of Labor) required to facilitate regulatory oversight transition.

NONE

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

109

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT POWER MARKETS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today ordered its staff to conduct investigators will find out if any technical or operational factors, federal or state regulatory prohibitions

Laughlin, Robert B.

110

Environmental sciences division: Environmental regulatory update table July 1988  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Langston, M.E.; Nikbakht, A.; Salk, M.S.

1988-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Environmental regulatory update table, July/August 1994  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated bi-monthly with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Bock, R.E.; Salk, M.S.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, November--December 1993  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated bi-monthly with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.; Danford, G.S.; Lewis, E.B.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, May--June 1994  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated bimonthly with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Bock, R.E.; Salk, M.S.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

All General Counsel Reports | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 2011 21, 2011 Regulatory Burden Request for Information Response to Regulatory Burden RFI March 21, 2011 Fireplace pictures pictures of fireplaces March 21, 2011 COGR Council on Governmental Relations Reducing Regulatory Burden - EO 13563 Retrospective Review March 21, 2011 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Hearth Patio & Barbecue Association comments on Regulatory Burden RFI March 21, 2011 Re: Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations Comments from Edison Electric Institute on DOE's Request for Information regarding the burden of DOE regulations. March 21, 2011 certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) The current certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for

115

Regulatory Design for RES-E Support Mechanisms: Learning Curves, Market Structure, and Burden-Sharing  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Drawing from relevant experiences in power systems around the world, this paper offers a critical review of existing policy support mechanisms for RES-E (renewable energy sources for electricity), with a detailed analysis ...

Batlle, Carlos

116

FRAMES User Defined Body Burden Concentration File Module Documentation  

SciTech Connect

The Framework for Risk Analysis in Multimedia Environmental Systems (FRAMES) Body Burden Concentration File (BBF) contains time-varying, instantaneous, constituent concentrations for body burden by contaminant. This report contains the requirements for this file and will be used by software engineers and testers to ensure that the file inputs properly.

Pelton, Mitchell A.; Rutz, Frederick C.; Eslinger, Melany A.; Gelston, Gariann M.

2001-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

Work for Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Safety Related Applications  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nuclear Regulatory Nuclear Regulatory Commission Capabilities Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Overview Energy System Applications Safety-Related Applications Overview DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology Nuclear Regulatory Commission National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Homeland Security Applications Biomedical Applications Millimiter Wave Group Papers Other NPNS Capabilities Work with Argonne Contact us For Employees Site Map Help Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter NE on Flickr Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Safety Related Applications Bookmark and Share Nuclear Regulatory Commission International Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program Key objectives of the International Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program

118

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

119

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mason Emnett Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or its Commissioners Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands 2 Purpose of this Presentation * Describe the types of transactions that fall under FERC jurisdiction * Describe pertinent federal laws and how they apply - What does it mean to be a "public utility" or "transmitting utility" under federal law? - How does ownership and usage of a generation facility impact regulatory considerations? - When are parties required to register with NERC? 3 FERC-Related Statutes * Federal Power Act

120

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). I have reviewed the Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). In the Department of Energy"s (DOE) attempt to meet its obligation to implement Executive Order 13563, ""Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,"" issued by the President on January 18, 2011, I recommend DOE make a bold move to change

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Low Dose Radiation Research Program: Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory, and Societal Impact of the DOE Low Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory, and Societal Impact of the DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program Antone L. Brooks Why This Project? For maximum benefit, state-of-the-art research and new data from the Low Dose Radiation Research Program must be available to other scientists, regulatory agencies, and the public. This project stays abreast of scientific advances in the field, gathers, integrates, and summarizes the research within the program, and disseminates this information to appropriate scientific, regulatory, and public venues. Project Goals Provides a focal point for distribution of information generated in the program, to scientific committees, other governmental and regulatory agencies, and to the public Provides scientific support for the Low Dose Program website

122

Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Processes to Regulatory Processes to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Regulatory Processes on AddThis.com... About History & Impacts Statutory Authorities & Rules Regulatory Processes Plans & Schedules Reports & Publications Standards & Test Procedures Implementation, Certification & Enforcement Rulemakings & Notices Further Guidance ENERGY STAR® Popular Links Success Stories

123

Creating a Comprehensive, Efficient, and Sustainable Nuclear Regulatory Structure  

SciTech Connect

Abstract. With the congressionally mandated January 1, 2013 deadline for the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Nuclear Material Protection, Control and Accounting (MPC&A) program to complete its transition of MPC&A responsibility to the Russian Federation, NNSA management directed its MPC&A program managers and team leaders to demonstrate that work in ongoing programs would lead to successful and timely achievement of these milestones. In the spirit of planning for successful project completion, the NNSA review of the Russian regulatory development process confirmed the critical importance of an effective regulatory system to a sustainable nuclear protection regime and called for an analysis of the existing Russian regulatory structure and the identification of a plan to ensure a complete MPC&A regulatory foundation. This paper describes the systematic process used by the U.S. DOE MPC&A Regulatory Development Project RDP) to develop an effective and sustainable MPC&A regulatory structure in the Russian Federation. This nuclear regulatory system will address all non-military Category I and II nuclear materials at State Corporation for Atomic Energy Rosatom, the Federal Service for Ecological, Technological, and Nuclear Oversight (Rostechnadzor), the Federal Agency for Marine and River Transport (FAMRT, within the Ministry of Transportation), and the Ministry of Industry and Trade (Minpromtorg). The approach to ensuring a complete and comprehensive nuclear regulatory structure includes five sequential steps. The approach was adopted from DOEs project management guidelines and was adapted to the regulatory development task by the RDP. The five steps in the Regulatory Development Process are: 1) Define MPC&A Structural Elements; 2) Analyze the existing regulatory documents using the identified Structural Elements; 3) Validate the analysis with Russian colleagues and define the list of documents to be developed; 4) Prioritize and schedule the development of documents; 5) Identify and develop processes to measure effectiveness of regulations. Utilizing this process is resulting in an effective regulatory process that is understood and is being adopted by the four RF organizations. It is anticipated that the current regulatory development process will continue after U.S. support ends. Utilization of the systematic methodology will ensure regulatory development is based on required MPC&A structural elements and will support the continued maintenance and development of an effective regulatory base.

O'Brien, Patricia; Wright, Troy L.; Tuttle, John D.; Hazel, Michael J.; Schlegel, Steven C.; Miller, Daniel R.

2009-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

124

Final Regulatory Impact Review/ Final Environmental Assessment/Initial Regulatory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Final Regulatory Impact Review/ Final Environmental Assessment/Initial Regulatory Flexibility................................................................................................. 1 2 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW................................................................. 2 2 Analysis Amendment 97 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

125

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS for Modifying existing Chinook and chum salmon savings areas AMENDMENT 84 to the Fishery Management Plan by the current regulatory closure regulations, as much higher salmon bycatch rates are reportedly encountered

126

Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DRAFT Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis analyzes alternatives to include three species For Amendment 100 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

127

A process for reducing the licensing burden for new products containing depleted uranium.  

SciTech Connect

This report is intended to provide guidance on the process for petitioning the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to initiate a rulemaking that could reduce the licensing burden for new products containing depleted uranium (DU), which are being investigated by the DU Uses Research and Development (R&D) Program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The focus is on requirements of the NRC rulemaking process applicable to establishing new exemptions or general licenses for products and devices containing source material. NRC policies and guidance regarding such requirements are described, including a 1965 policy statement on approval of new exemptions for products containing radionuclides (''Federal Register'', Volume 30, page 3462 [30 FR 3462]; March 16, 1965) and Regulatory Guide 6.7, which addresses the contents of environmental reports that support rulemaking petitions seeking exemptions for radionuclide-containing products. Methodologies for calculating radiological and nonradiological impacts on human health (i.e., risks) associated with distributing, using, and disposing of DU-containing products are presented. Also, methodologies for completing assessments of the potential effects of accidents involving new DU-containing products and of product misuse are described. The report recommends that the U.S. Department of Energy formulate a regulatory plan for deployment of DU-containing products in areas that are not already radiologically controlled. Such a plan is needed because deployment of new DU-containing products may be difficult under existing NRC licensing requirements. To provide a basis for the regulatory plan, it is recommended that detailed assessments of the radiological and nonradiological risks of distributing, using, and disposing of DU-containing products be conducted. Such assessments should be initiated as soon as sufficient data are available from the ongoing DU Uses R&D Program at ORNL to support the analyses.

Ranek, N. L.; Kamboj, S.; Hartmann, H. M.; Avci, H.

2004-01-06T23:59:59.000Z

128

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT AND FERC STAFF The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today accepted a settlement, valued at nearly $500 stemming from the 2000-2001 energy crisis in California and other Western states. The global settlement

Laughlin, Robert B.

129

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT POWER EXCHANGE MARKET The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a staff settlement calling-2-001 COMMISSION APPROVES $13.8 MILLION SETTLEMENT WITH RELIANT ENERGY OVER PHYSICAL WITHHOLDING IN CALIFORNIA

Laughlin, Robert B.

130

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today accepted an agreement between Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. AGREEMENT ACCEPTED BETWEEN ENRON AND NEVADA COMPANIES SETTLING MATTERS STEMMING FROM WESTERN ENERGY CRISIS

Laughlin, Robert B.

131

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT FERC APPROVES SETTLEMENT WITH RELIANT IN CALIFORNIA CASES; PROCEEDS COULD TOTAL $50 MILLION The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a settlement between the Commission's enforcement staff

Laughlin, Robert B.

132

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT CRISIS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a comprehensive settlement among APX Inc. Coral Power LLC, Puget Sound Energy Inc. and Avista are Supporting Parties. R-07-14 (30) #12;

Laughlin, Robert B.

133

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACTS al. COMMISSION ACCEPTS ENRON SETTLEMENT VALUED AT $1.5 BILLION The Federal Energy Regulatory-2001 Western energy crisis, said Commission Chairman Joseph T. Kelliher. "The parties are to be congratulated

Laughlin, Robert B.

134

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT-95-191 COMMISSION APPROVES TWO WESTERN POWER SETTLEMENTS The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved two markets during the Western energy crisis of 2000-2001. The first case involves a settlement agreement

Laughlin, Robert B.

135

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON,D.C.20426 NEWS RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 1290 OF EPACT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today approved a settlement, collectively valued at $6.4 billion, which the Commission has approved stemming from the California energy

Laughlin, Robert B.

136

Global Health: Measuring the Global Burden of Disease  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...effective and high-quality care to patients without knowing their diagnoses; likewise, for health systems to be effective, it is necessary to understand the key challenges in efforts to improve population health and how these challenges are changing. Before the early 1990s, there was no comprehensive... The burden that disease places on societies around the world is complex and changing as communicable diseases are replaced by noncommunicable diseases. This article summarizes these changes and the current burden.

Murray C.J.L.; Lopez A.D.

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

Phenylpropanoid related regulatory protein-regulatory region associations  

SciTech Connect

Materials and methods for identifying lignin regulatory region-regulatory protein associations are disclosed. Materials and methods for modulating lignin accumulation are also disclosed.

Apuya, Nestor (Culver City, CA); Bobzin, Steven Craig (Malibu, CA); Park, Joon-Hyun (Oak Park, CA); Doukhanina, Elena (Newbury Park, CA)

2012-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

138

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ............................................................................................................................1 2 Regulatory Impact Review FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

139

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ..............................................................................................................................................1 2 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

140

DOE-STD-101-92  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Compilation of Nuclear Safety Criteria for Potential Application to DOE Nonreactor Nuclear Facilities Canceled, Effective October 2001, due to FY 2001 Sunset Review This guide is a compilation and source list of nuclear safety criteria primarily used by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and private industry in commercial NNFs. Because the DOE , in some areas of NNF design, construction, operation, and decommissioning has taken the lead in developing NNF criteria, the guide also includes criteria used by the DOE and DOE contractors.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

NETL: IEP - Air Quality Research: Regulatory Drivers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers DOE/NETL’s Air Quality Research Program is in direct response to the need to ensure that fossil-fuel-fired power systems continue to meet current and future environmental requirements. Specific environmental regulatory requirements driving this research are briefly summarized below: I. Clean Air Act (Including 1990 Amendments) Title I - Air Pollution Prevention and Control Part A - Air Quality and Emission Limitations Sect. 109 - National Ambient Air Quality Standards In July 1997 EPA promulgated new standards for particulate matter finer than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5) and revised the ambient ozone standards. Sect. 111 - Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources Part C - Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality

142

Regulatory guidance document  

SciTech Connect

The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Program Management System Manual requires preparation of the OCRWM Regulatory Guidance Document (RGD) that addresses licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance. The document provides: regulatory compliance policy; guidance to OCRWM organizational elements to ensure a consistent approach when complying with regulatory requirements; strategies to achieve policy objectives; organizational responsibilities for regulatory compliance; guidance with regard to Program compliance oversight; and guidance on the contents of a project-level Regulatory Compliance Plan. The scope of the RGD includes site suitability evaluation, licensing, environmental compliance, and safety and health compliance, in accordance with the direction provided by Section 4.6.3 of the PMS Manual. Site suitability evaluation and regulatory compliance during site characterization are significant activities, particularly with regard to the YW MSA. OCRWM`s evaluation of whether the Yucca Mountain site is suitable for repository development must precede its submittal of a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Accordingly, site suitability evaluation is discussed in Chapter 4, and the general statements of policy regarding site suitability evaluation are discussed in Section 2.1. Although much of the data and analyses may initially be similar, the licensing process is discussed separately in Chapter 5. Environmental compliance is discussed in Chapter 6. Safety and Health compliance is discussed in Chapter 7.

NONE

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

143

Low Dose Radiation Research Program: Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory and Social Impact of the DOE Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory and Social Impact of the DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program. Authors: Antone L.Brooks, Richard J. Bull, Lezlie A. Couch. Institutions: Washington State University Tri-Cities The purpose of this project is to provide scientific, technical, and organizational support to optimize the impact of the DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program. This project will serve as a focal point for collection and dissemination of scientific information from the scientists funded in the Program to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the regulatory agencies, and the public. The project will be responsible for analysis of the scientific information in the broader context of biomedical research and will provide this information to the Office of Biological Research

144

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 21, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 244)] December 21, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 244)] [Proposed Rules] [Page 71331-71333] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr21de99-21] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Parts 71 and 73 RIN 3150-AG41 Advance Notification to Native American Tribes of Transportation of Certain Types of Nuclear Waste AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering an amendment to its regulations that would require NRC licensees to notify

145

REGULATORY STATUS: AOC  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

184 UNIT NAME: Concrete Rubble pile 129) REGULATORY STATUS: AOC LOCATION: Outside plant security south of C-611 Water Treatment Plant. Estimated to be less than 5 cubic feet....

146

Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

from The National Association of Regulatory Utility from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) on the Smart Grid RFI Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) on the Smart Grid RFI The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on this Request for Information (RFI) regarding the policy and logistical challenges of the smart grid. The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). More Documents & Publications RE: NBP RFI: Data Access In the Matter of Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid; Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy, 75 Federal Register 33611 (June 14, 2010).

147

DOE Office of Science - Chicago Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) In 1977 the Administration and Congress acted to further consolidate federal energy policy, R&D, and nuclear energy defense functions. ERDA was integrated with the Federal Energy Administration and other federal energy functions to create a Cabinet-level U.S. Department of Energy. The governmental elements brought together to form DOE included the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; the Economic Regulatory Administration; the automotive research and development sections of the Environmental Protection Agency; Solar Research and Development from the National Science Foundation; and Fossil Energy and Development from the Department of the Interior's Office of Coal Research, as well as several Power Administrations.

148

The waste isolation pilot plant regulatory compliance program  

SciTech Connect

The passage of the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act of 1992 (LWA) marked a turning point for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) program. It established a Congressional mandate to open the WIPP in as short a time as possible, thereby initiating the process of addressing this nation`s transuranic (TRU) waste problem. The DOE responded to the LWA by shifting the priority at the WIPP from scientific investigations to regulatory compliance and the completion of prerequisites for the initiation of operations. Regulatory compliance activities have taken four main focuses: (1) preparing regulatory submittals; (2) aggressive schedules; (3) regulator interface; and (4) public interactions

Mewhinney, J.A. [U.S. Dept. of Energy, Carlsbad, NM (United States); Kehrman, R.F. [Westinghouse Electric Corp., Carlsbad, NM (United States)

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

DOE/FE-0564  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Prepared by: U.S. Department of Energy Natural Gas Imports and Exports First Quarter Report 2013 LNG Trinidad and Tobago Canada Mexico Qatar Yemen NATURAL GAS IMPORTS AND EXPORTS FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2013 Office of Natural Gas Regulatory Activities Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy 202-586-9478 ngreports@hq.doe.gov Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................... 1 1 Quarterly Summary ...................................................... 3 Maps of Imports & Exports by Point of Entry/Exit ................................... 5 Tabular Summaries & Comparisons .................................................................. 11 1a Quarter in Review ...................................................................................................13

150

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contacts Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Contacts for EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities on

151

Microbiological Burden on the Surfaces of Explorer XXXIII Spacecraft  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...3.60 104. However, assembly of parts which were not decontaminated for engineering reasons or were not assembled under cleanroom conditions increased the viable microbial burden at the time of launch to 2.62 105. APPLIED MIcRomoLOGy, Sept 1967, p...

Edmund M. Powers

1967-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

DOE Online  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fermilab's Science Adventures! Fermilab's Science Adventures! DOE Online K-12 Instructional Resources ed.fnal.gov/doe/ The U.S. Department of Energy is committed to helping educate our nation's next generation of scientists. The following resources help teachers integrate the Internet into K-12 classroom instruction. DOE Labs General Instructional Units Online Resources Lesson Plans General References DOE Laboratory and Facility Education Home Pages (www-ed.fnal.gov/doe/doe_labs.html) Direct links for 27 education Websites at DOE national laboratories and facilities. Online Catalog (www-ed.fnal.gov/trc/library) Fermilab's Teacher Resource Center collection of 10,000+ PreK-12 instructional materials in science, mathematics and technology. Materials include tradebooks, curriculum materials, educational

153

Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission More Documents & Publications What to Expect When Readying to Move Spent Nuclear Fuel from...

154

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW: ECONOMIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE ALTERNATIVES FOR AMENDMENT 47 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE GROUNDFISH FISHERY OF THE BERING SEA AND ALEUTIAN

155

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS to the Fisheries Management Plan (FMP) for the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) area, approved on March 4. The structure of the FMP allows certain measures to be changed by regulatory amendments without amending the FMP

156

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/INITIAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/INITIAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS OF A REGULATORY AMENDMENT TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR GROUNDFISH OF THE GULF OF ALASKA and the GROUNDFISH Islands Area (BSAI) are managed under the Fishery Management Plans for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska

157

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area October 2007 Prepared that bycatch may be exacerbated by the current regulatory closure regulations, as much higher salmon bycatch

158

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS Juneau, AK 99802 (907) 586-7228 Abstract: This Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review For Amendment 89 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management

159

DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

a useful reference. Find out more Do you have questions about DOE PAGESBeta content, procedures, or policies? More information is available at OSTI's Public Access Policy page and...

160

DOE News  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SMALL BUSINESS SYMPOSIUM TO LINK LOCAL COMPANIES WITH HANFORD CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES RICHLAND, Wash. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at the Hanford...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS: This Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA For Amendments to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

162

E-Print Network 3.0 - air pollution burden Sample Search Results  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

burden Search Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: air pollution burden Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Economic and Policy Implications of Urban...

163

Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit in Just One Month Department of Energy Commends the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Approval of a Second Early Site Permit in Just One Month March 27, 2007 - 12:10pm Addthis The Entergy Corporation's Grand Gulf Site in Mississippi Receives NRC Approval for an ESP WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today applauded the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) decision to approve an Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Entergy Corporation's Grand Gulf Nuclear Station in Mississippi. This approval, the second ESP this month, demonstrates another major milestone in President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative, which plans to expand the use of safe and clean nuclear power. Earlier this

164

Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First United States Nuclear Plant Site in Over 30 Years Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First United States Nuclear Plant Site in Over 30 Years March 8, 2007 - 10:28am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today commended the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's decision to approve the first-ever Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Exelon Generation Company's Clinton site, in central Illinois. This decision marks a major milestone in the President's plan to expand the use of safe and clean nuclear power. As part of President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative - which seeks to change the way we power this nation - nuclear power will play an increasingly

165

FPCC Regulatory Barriers Submittal | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Barriers Submittal FPCC Regulatory Barriers Submittal The Federal Performance Contracting Coalition (FPCC) appreciates the opportunity to comment on reducing regulatory...

166

Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Generation Projects on Federal Lands Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects on Federal Lands Presentation covers regulatory considerations for developing...

167

Regulatory requirements affecting disposal of asbestos-containing waste  

SciTech Connect

Many U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facilities are undergoing decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) activities. The performance of these activities may generate asbestos-containing waste because asbestos was formerly used in many building materials, including floor tile, sealants, plastics, cement pipe, cement sheets, insulating boards, and insulating cements. The regulatory requirements governing the disposal of these wastes depend on: (1) the percentage of asbestos in the waste and whether the waste is friable (easily crumbled or pulverized); (2) other physical and chemical characteristics of the waste; and (3) the State in which the waste is generated. This Information Brief provides an overview of the environment regulatory requirements affecting disposal of asbestos-containing waste. It does not address regulatory requirements applicable to worker protection promulgated under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHAct), the Mining Safety and Health Act (MSHA), or the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

UNIT NAME: C-611-4 Horseshoe Laaoon REGULATORY STATUS: AOC  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

UNIT NAME: C-611-4 Horseshoe Laaoon REGULATORY STATUS: AOC LOCATION: Outside plant security fence west side near C-611 Water Treatment Plant on DOE property. 80 feet long by 71...

169

UNIT NAME: C-611 Se~tic SvBtem REGULATORY STATUS: AOC  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

UNIT NUMBER: 187 UNIT NAME: C-611 Setic SvBtem REGULATORY STATUS: AOC LOCATION: DOE property outside the plant security fence, due south of the C-611 Water Treatment Plant. 50...

170

"List of Covered Electric Utilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA)- 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Under Title I, Sec. 102(c) of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is required to publish a list identifying each electric utility

171

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: fergas@hq.doe.sov  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

TO: fergas@hq.doe.sov U.S. Department of Energy (FE-34) Office of Fossil Energy Office of Natural Gas Regulatory Activities Attn: Natural Gas Reports P.O. Box 44375 Washington,...

172

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- El_Verde  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Rico El Verde, Puerto Rico, Site Other Regulatory Framework elverde The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for a tree in Study Area 4 of El Verde site in 2005....

173

DOE-HDBK-1143-2001; Radiological Control Training for Supervisors - Overheads  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Control Training for Supervisors Control Training for Supervisors DOE-HDBK-1143-2001 Overheads Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy Radiological Control Training for Supervisors DOE-HDBK-1143-2001 Overheads This page intentionally left blank. ii OT 1.1 DOE-HDBK-1143-2001 Overhead 1.1 Regulatory Documents Objectives: * Identify the hierarchy of regulatory documents. * Define the purposes of 10 CFR Parts 820, 830 and 835. * Define the purpose of the DOE Radiological Control Standard. OT 1.2 DOE-HDBK-1143-2001 Overhead 1.2 Regulatory Documents (cont.) Objectives: * Define the terms

174

DOE Extends Comment Period for Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations. The Department is interested in receiving comment on the...

175

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments relevant to the following two sections of the RFI: "Long Term Issues: Managing a Grid with High Penetration of New Technologies" and "Reliability and Cyber-Security," US...

176

Fact Sheet: DOE/National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissione...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

workshops on technologies and practices, particularly for leak detection, measurement and repair. DOENETL-facilitated briefings for NARUC Committees on key insights from...

177

DOE F 740-MX  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Form 740M Form 740M (10-88) MANDATORY DATA COLLECTION AUTHORIZED BY 10 CFR 30, 40, 50, 70, 75, 150, Public Laws 83-703, 93-438, 95-91 OMB Control No. 1910-1800 4. REPORTING PERIOD 3. RIS 2. ATTACHMENT TO a. DOE/NRC 741 a. SHIPPER'S RIS b. RECEIVER'S RIS c. TRANS. NO. d. CORR NO. e. PC f. AC g. DATA CODE b. DOE/NRC 742 c. DOE/NRC 742c 5. TRANSACTION DATA 1. NAME 8a. LINE NO. 9. SIGNATURE (See instructions for provisions regarding confidentiality.) To the best of my knowledge and belief, the information given above and in any attached schedules is true, complete, and correct. 10. TITLE 11. DATE b. ENTRY REFERENCE c. TEXT OF CONCISE NOTE STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE FROM 6. REPORTING DATE 7. LICENSE NUMBERS TO Public Reporting Notice Disclosure on Back U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

178

DOE017-0153  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5525 5525 DOE017-0153 ,-.or/ N"( - ./,'-'S MaryBeth Zimmerman 02/14/2001 11:08AM / -- T ' ,44 L - ( _w _1_'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - .I f . J To: Kenneth Friedman/EE/DOE@DOE, Peggy Podolak/EE/DOE@DOE, Linda Silverman/EE/DOE@DOE, Ed Wall/EE/DOE@DOE, David RodgerslEE/DOE@DOE, Jerry DionlEE/DOE@DOE, Gail McKinley/EE/DOE@DOE. Lawrence MansuetifEE/DOE@DOE cc: John Sullivan/EE/DOE@DOE. Darrell Beschen/EEIDOE@DOE, Michael York/EE/DOE@DOE, Buddy GarlandlEEIDOE@DOE, Nancy Jefferv/EEIDOE@DOE, Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE. Sam Baldwin/EE/DOE@DOE, IEE-ADAS Subject: FW: NEP Draft outline Directions on NEP Assessment paper. Please read all of this very carefully before proceeding: Product Schedule: * Inputs due from sectors to Planning: COB on Thursday (sorry) o Due from EERE to Policy Office: noon on Friday

179

DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

States Government purposes. (End of Notice) Ref. DEAR970.5227-2 Rights in data-technology transfer DOE-funded authors are free to publish in journals of their choice, including...

180

Certification for DOE O 422.1 Admin Chg 1  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

Based on discussions with the DOE Facility Representative and System Safety Oversight field personnel, who use DOE Order 422.1, this Order is still relevant in its current form. No significant changes are warranted at this time. In addition, this directive is not found to cause undue burden (i.e ., significant cost impacts, overly prescriptive, redundancy, or excessive reporting requirements) on Departmental elements and contractors.

2014-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INL/MIS-12-27161 Revision 0 Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities Ken Thomas September 2012 DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation,

182

Low Dose Radiation Research Program: Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory and Societal Impact of the DOE Optimizing the Scientific, Regulatory and Societal Impact of the DOE Low Dose Research Program Authors: Antone L. Brooks Institution: Washington State University Tri-Cities Richland, Washington The purpose of this project is to provide a focal point for communication of the research results from the DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program. The major communication tool provided by this project is a Website at Washington State University. The website is being maintained to provide communication between the scientific advances generated by the research program and scientists both in and outside the program, policy makers, regulators and the public. The website also contains a number of presentations and illustrations that are written so that they will be easy

183

Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations Exceptions to DOE Rules and Regulations The Department of Energy (DOE) issues test procedures and regulations covering a number of products, but does provide for exceptions to these rules under certain circumstances. Any person, as defined by 10 CFR 1003.2, can apply to the DOE for an exception from a rule, regulation, or DOE action having the effect of a rule, as provided for in section 504 of 42 U.S.C. 7194 and codified in 10 CFR 1003 subpart B. The DOE Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) is responsible for issuing an order either granting or denying the application, in whole or in part, based upon a showing of serious hardship, gross inequity or unfair distribution of burdens, after considering the application and other

184

Nuclear Regulatory Commission issuances  

SciTech Connect

This thirty-second volume of issuances (1--496) of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards, and Administrative Law Judges it covers the period from July 1, 1990 to December 31, 1990. The hardbound edition of the Nuclear Regulatory commission Issuances is a final compilation of the monthly issuances. It includes all of the legal precedents for the agency within a six-month period. Any opinions, decisions, denials, memoranda and orders of the Commission inadvertently omitted from the monthly softbounds and any corrections submitted by the NRC legal staff to the printed softbound issuances are contained in the hardbound edition. Cross references in the text and indexes are to the NRCI page numbers which are the same as the page numbers in this publication. Issuances are referred to as follows: Commission--CLI, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards--ALAB, Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards--LBP, Administrative Law Judges--ALJ, Directors'Decisions--DD, and Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking--DPRM. Specific facilities discussed are: Carroll County Nuclear Station; Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station; Perry Nuclear Power Plant; Quad Cities Nuclear Power Stations; Seabrook Station; Shoreham Nuclear Generating Plant; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant.

Not Available

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

185

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric Utilities. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric Utilities. Under Title I of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is required to publish a list identifying each electric utility that Title I applies to. [See PURPA SEC. 102(c).] The following list is being released by DOE in August 2006 for review and comment by state public utility commissions. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric

186

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) -List of Covered Electric Utilities - 2006 Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) -List of Covered Electric Utilities - 2006 Under Title I of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is required to publish a list identifying each electric utility that Title I applies to. [See PURPA SEC. 102(c).] The following list is being released by DOE in August 2006 for review and comment by state public utility commissions. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric

187

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review / Initial Regulatory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review / Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Proposed Amendment 42 to the Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands King and Tanner � Public review Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Crab Fisheries October 2012 ii #12;Modification of economic

188

DOE HANDBOOK  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Handbook on Overseas Assignments Handbook on Overseas Assignments United States Department of Energy Office of Human Capital Management July 2013 2 Introduction This handbook covers all types of Federal employment overseas, including details, both within DOE as well as to other agencies; transfers to approved international organizations; assignments to permanent DOE positions; cost-free experts; and personal services agreements (PSAs). This handbook contains information, guidance, sample service agreements, and related documentation that are to be used to implement the following directives: a. Executive Order 11552, Providing for Details and Transfers of Federal Employees to International Organizations at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/11552.html;

189

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FOR FISHERY PLAN AMENDMENTS TO PROHIBIT USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE ALTERNATIVES / Aleutian Islands Plan Amendment 33 and Gulf of Alaska Plan Amendment 37 Prepared by Staff of the North

190

DOE-Wide NEPA Contracting | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-Wide NEPA Contracting DOE-Wide NEPA Contracting DOE-Wide NEPA Contracting DOE has seven indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (task order) contracts for use by DOE Program and Field Offices nationwide, including the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.These contracts are for NEPA support services in preparing EISs and EAs, environmental reports and other documentation required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in its review of license applications, and other related environmental documents, such as floodplain and wetland assessments. The links above provide useful information to potential users of the DOE-wide NEPA contracts primarily DOE NEPA Compliance Officers, NEPA Document Managers, and Contracting Officers. The documents are public

191

DOE Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

192

DOE Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

772 772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 DOE/EA-1772 Environmental Assessment for the Multipurpose Haul Road Within the Idaho National Laboratory Site August 2010 CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................

193

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW /  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Regulatory Impact Review For a proposed Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska to Remove

194

The Regulatory Functional Review: Primary Roles  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The regulatory professional will review the study design and the clinical plan for regulatory approval, and ensure that it will support ... described and in populations acceptable to the relevant regulatory agenc...

Raymond A. Huml

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review For Amendment 99 to the Fishery Management Plan ..................................................................................................... iii 1.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW................................................................................................................1 1.1.1 What is a Regulatory Impact Review

196

DOE Transmission Capacity Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Capacity Report Transmission Capacity Report DOE Transmission Capacity Report DOE Transmission Capacity Report: Transmission lines, substations, circuit breakers, capacitors, and other equipment provide more than just a highway to deliver energy and power from generating units to distribution systems. Transmission systems both complement and substitute for generation. Transmission generally enhances reliability; lowers the cost of electricity delivered to consumers; limits the ability of generators to exercise market power; and provides flexibility to protect against uncertainties about future fuel prices, load growth, generator construction, and other factors affecting the electric system. DOE Transmission Capacity Report More Documents & Publications Report to Congress:Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's

197

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management * 20+ years of...

198

Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Presentation that outlines the rules, policies and orders that comprise the Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework. Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework More...

199

DOE Does Not Oppose Petitions to Intervene in Yucca Mountain NRC Proceeding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Does Not Oppose Petitions to Intervene in Yucca Mountain NRC DOE Does Not Oppose Petitions to Intervene in Yucca Mountain NRC Proceeding DOE Does Not Oppose Petitions to Intervene in Yucca Mountain NRC Proceeding March 30, 2010 - 9:57am Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy yesterday filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission a response to Petitions to Intervene filed by several parties seeking to oppose the Department's motion to withdraw its license application for a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain. DOE said it is confident that its motion to withdraw the application is lawful, but that it believes the petitioning parties should be allowed to present their views to the NRC. It thus did not oppose the motions to intervene, and proposed a schedule for resolving the dispute over the Department's motion to withdraw the application. The parties seeking to intervene are

200

Regulatory Drivers | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers Statutes and Regulations Relating to Legacy Management Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 10: Energy "Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste," 10 CFR 61 "Occupational Radiation Protection," 10 CFR 835 Title 40: Protection of Environment "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations," 40 CFR 141 "Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities," 40 CFR 264 "National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan," 40 CFR 300 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) "Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

European Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The paper is intended to focus on peculiarities of nanomedicine and the importance of social concerns implicated,...ad hoc regulatory framework is needed. Consideration of social challenges will underline the cru...

Giorgia Guerra

2008-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

NETL: IEP - Mercury Emissions Control: Regulatory Drivers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) brought about new awareness regarding the overall health-effects of stationary source fossil combustion emissions. Title III of the CAAA identified 189 pollutants, including mercury, as hazardous or toxic and required the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to evaluate their emissions by source, health effects and environmental implications, including the need to control these emissions. These pollutants are collectively referred to as air toxics or hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The provisions in Title III specific to electric generating units (EGU) were comprehensively addressed by DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in collaborative air toxic characterization programs conducted between 1990 and 1997. This work provided most of the data supporting the conclusions found in EPA's congressionally mandated reports regarding air toxic emissions from coal-fired utility boilers; the Mercury Study Report to Congress (1997)1 and the "Study of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units -- Final Report to Congress" (1998).2 The first report identified coal-fired power plants as the largest source of human-generated mercury emissions in the U.S. and the second concluded that mercury from coal-fired utilities was the HAP of "greatest potential concern" to the environment and human health that merited additional research and monitoring.

203

The Economic Burden of Malaria John Luke Gallup and Jeffrey D. Sachs  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Economic Burden of Malaria John Luke Gallup and Jeffrey D. Sachs CID Working Paper No. 52 July College at Harvard University Center for International Development Working Papers #12;THE ECONOMIC BURDEN been either subtropical or islands. These countries' economic growth in the five years after

204

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Key Key Federal Statutes to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Federal Statutes on AddThis.com... Home About Contacts Covered Fleets Compliance Methods Alternative Fuel Petitions Resources Key Federal Statutes These are excerpts from federal statutes that established key Energy Policy Act (EPAct) transportation regulatory activities.

205

Previously DOE F 5635.11 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Control No.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9.2 9.2 (08-93) Previously DOE F 5635.11 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Control No. 1910-1800 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REPORTING UNACCOUNTED FOR DOCUMENTS OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 24.3 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Office of Information Resources Management Policy, Plans, and Oversight, AD-244 - GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1800), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000

206

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Home > Groups > OpenEI Community Central Graham7781's picture Submitted by Graham7781(2002) Super contributor 5 August, 2013 - 13:18 geothermal NREL OpenEI regulatory roadmap Navigating the complex system of federal and state regulations to secure project approvals is one of the biggest hurdles geothermal power developers face-but not if they've got a map outlining every twist and turn. DOE's Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap, a new online tool for agency, industry, and policymaker use, helps developers make it through regulatory requirements at every level of government more easily to deploy geothermal energy projects. Designed to help strengthen collaboration between federal and state agencies, the roadmap should also speed the review of proposed projects and

207

DOE Onboarding  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One-Year Passport to Success One-Year Passport to Success What is On-boarding? Orientation On-boarding  Transactional focus and goals  Less than one week  Executed by HR Office  Address new employee needs  Completed paperwork  Strategic focus and goals  Starts before first day through first year  Supervisor & Senior Leadership involvement  Integrate multiple offices, functions and individuals  Address employee needs  Maximizes employee engagement and retention 2 On-boarding Program Goals 3  Build and sustain high-performance culture by accelerating time for new employee to become productive  Create learning opportunities that allow new employees to successfully integrate into their new DOE organization  Provide employees with the tools and resources to

208

DOE 11  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE A ward N o.: D E--NT0005665 Final T echnical R eport (October 2 008 - S eptember 2 012) Source c haracterization a nd t emporal variation o f m ethane s eepage f rom thermokarst l akes o n t he A laska N orth S lope in r esponse t o A rctic c limate c hange Submitted b y: University o f A laska Fairbanks, A K 9 9775 Prepared for: United S tates D epartment o f E nergy National E nergy T echnology L aboratory May 29 th 2013 Office of Fossil Energy 2 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any

209

DOE Pulse  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

go! go! home about archives subscribe Profile Dr. Isaac Gamwo (left) works with Dr. Ward Burgess (right) at the National Energy Technology Laboratory. Photo Credit: NETL. The practical application of an elite researcher's life: Isaac K. Gamwo For a man whose expertise includes reactive multiphase fluid dynamics, complex fluid properties, and chemical looping combustion processes, Dr. Isaac Gamwo is surprisingly easy to comprehend. "The research we do in this lab is not confined to the world of academia," he notes, "it has tangible impacts on the way we produce energy." As senior research chemical engineer at DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Dr. Gamwo is currently focused on complex fluid properties at high temperatures and pressures. His recent work includes

210

DOE Code:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

we1rbox installatiOn we1rbox installatiOn ____:....;...=.~;;....:..;=-+- DOE Code: - - !- Project Lead: Wes R1esland NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY J 3-24-10 1 Date: Project Information 1. Project Overview What are tne enwonmental mpacts? Contractor~~ _ _ _ _ ] 11 The purpose of this project is to prepare a pad for a 90 ton crane to get 1nto positiOn and ng up so we can 1 set our new weir box into position We will widen the existing road around 20 feet at the north end and taper our fill to about5 feet at the south end for a total of about 200 feeL and budd a near level pad for them tong up the crane on We will use the d1rt from the hill irnrnedJateiy north of the work to oe done 2. 3 4 What*s the legal location? What IS the durabon of the prOJed?

211

The original of this document contains information which is subject...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

page number. 3 II. Regulatory Standard A. Individual's Burden A DOE administrative review proceeding under Part 710 is not a criminal matter, where the government has the...

212

Fireplace photo | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

photo Fireplace photo Photo of a fireplace. Fireplace photo More Documents & Publications .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Department...

213

Active DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Active DOE Technical Standards Active DOE Technical Standards Document Number Document Title Responsible SLM DOE-HDBK-1001-96 DOE-HDBK-1002-96 DOE-HDBK-1003-96 DOE-HDBK-1010-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1011/4-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1012/3-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1013/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/1-92 DOE-HDBK-1014/2-92 DOE-HDBK-1015/1-93

214

DOE-HDBK-1141-2001; Radiological Assessor Training, Student's Guide, Part 4 of 5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assessor Training Assessor Training DOE-HDBK-1141-2001 Student's Guide Office of Environment, Safety & Health U.S. Department of Energy Radiological Assessor Training DOE-HDBK-1141-2001 Student's Guide ii This page intentionally left blank. Radiological Assessor Training DOE-HDBK-1141-2001 Student's Guide iii Table of Contents Regulatory Documents.....................................................................................

215

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ..............................................................................................16 2 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW ANALYSIS for Amendment 83 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska ALLOCATION

216

Consolidated Storage Facilities: Camel's Nose or Shared Burden? - 13112  

SciTech Connect

The Blue Ribbon Commission (BRC) made a strong argument why the reformulated nuclear waste program should make prompt efforts to develop one or more consolidated storage facilities (CSFs), and recommended the amendment of NWPA Section 145(b) 2 (linking 'monitored retrievable storage' to repository development) as an essential means to that end. However, other than recommending that the siting of CSFs should be 'consent-based' and that spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at stranded sites should be first-in-line for removal, the Commission made few recommendations regarding how CSF development should proceed. Working with three other key Senators, Jeff Bingaman attempted in the 112. Congress to craft legislation (S. 3469) to put the BRC recommendations into legislative language. The key reason why the Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2012 did not proceed was the inability of the four senators to agree on whether and how to amend NWPA Section 145(b). A brief review of efforts to site consolidated storage since the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 suggests a strong and consistent motivation to shift the burden to someone (anyone) else. This paper argues that modification of NWPA Section 145(b) should be accompanied by guidelines for regional development and operation of CSFs. After review of the BRC recommendations regarding CSFs, and the 'camel's nose' prospects if implementation is not accompanied by further guidelines, the paper outlines a proposal for implementation of CSFs on a regional basis, including priorities for removal from reactor sites and subsequently from CSFs to repositories. Rather than allowing repository siting to be prejudiced by the location of a single remote CSF, the regional approach limits transport for off-site acceptance and storage, increases the efficiency of removal operations, provides a useful basis for compensation to states and communities that accept CSFs, and gives states with shared circumstances a shared stake in storage and disposal in an integrated national program. (authors)

Williams, James M. [Western Interstate Energy Board, 1600 Broadway, Suite 1700, Denver CO 80202 (United States)] [Western Interstate Energy Board, 1600 Broadway, Suite 1700, Denver CO 80202 (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

DOE Electricity Advisory Committee Meeting Arlington, Virginia  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Electricity Advisory Committee Meeting DOE Electricity Advisory Committee Meeting Arlington, Virginia October 29, 2010 Minutes EAC Members in Attendance Richard Cowart, Chair Regulatory Assistance Project The Honorable Lauren Azar, Vice Chair Wisconsin Public Utilities Commission Guido Bartels, IBM Rick Bowen, Alcoa Frederick Butler Salmon Ventures Ltd. Ralph Cavanagh Natural Resources Defense Council Lisa Crutchfield National Grid USA The Honorable Robert Curry New York State Public Service Commission José Delgado Roger Duncan Robert Gramlich American Wind Energy Association Michael Heyeck American Electric Power Joseph Kelliher NextEra Energy, Inc. Edward Krapels Anbaric Holdings Barry Lawson National Rural Electric Cooperative Association

218

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Key Terms Key Terms to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Key Terms on AddThis.com... Home About Covered Fleets Compliance Methods Alternative Fuel Petitions Resources Guidance Documents Statutes & Regulations Program Annual Reports Fact Sheets Newsletter Case Studies Workshops Tools Key Terms FAQs Key Terms The Energy Policy Act (EPAct) includes specific terminology related to

219

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory

220

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Fuel Petitions  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alternative Fuel Petitions to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Fuel Petitions on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Fuel Petitions on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Fuel Petitions on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Fuel Petitions on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Fuel Petitions on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Fuel Petitions on AddThis.com... Home About Covered Fleets Compliance Methods Alternative Fuel Petitions Resources Alternative Fuel Petitions Section 301(2) of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct 1992) defines

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Office of Enforcement - Regulatory Assistance Reviews  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Assistance Reviews Regulatory Assistance Reviews Office of Enforcement and Oversight (formerly Program Reviews) Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Reviews evaluate contractor programs for identifying, evaluating, reporting and correcting noncompliances. The objective of these reviews is to work collaboratively with sites to identify areas where program effectiveness can be improved and ensure that noncompliances are being proactively self-identified. 2013 Office of Security Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Review of Battelle at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, July 18, 2013 Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Review of L ATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, February 11, 2013 Office of Security Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Review of

222

Revision to DOE Order 435.1 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Order 435.1 Revision to DOE Order 435.1 The Office of Environmental Management has primary responsibility, within DOE, for DOE Order 435.1, the self-regulation of radioactive waste management. As part of this responsibility, EM has decided to update the Order to incorporate several changes to the regulatory process that have taken place over the last decade as well as streamline the Order to improve management of the waste. A comprehensive complex-wide review of DOE radioactive waste management activities associated with implementation of the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, was conducted in 2010 in order to gather feedback on the effectiveness of the DOE Order 435.1 requirements (not to assess compliance with the

223

All General Counsel Reports | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2011 1, 2011 Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden Comments on reducing regulatory burden. March 31, 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI Hearth & Home Technologies comments on Regulatory Burden RFI March 24, 2011 Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden Hussmann manufacturer of commercial refrigeration products, appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's Request for Comments on the topic of the Regulatory Burden notice of published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011. Our comments on several issues listed in the proposed RFI follow. March 23, 2011 O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS database\DOE\2011\DOE-HQ-2011-0014 - Daniel Cohen - GC\Comments from FDMS\Charles W Adams DRAFT-0005.html

224

Department of Energy - DOE, NEPA and You - A Guide to Public...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Department of Energy - DOE, NEPA and You - A Guide to Public ParticipationPermitting...

225

Status Update on Action 2d: Discussion of DEAR ISM Clause in DOE Contracts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Slide Presentation by Patricia Worthington, PhD, Director Office of Health and Safety, Office of Health Safety and Security. Regulatory Aspects of ISM--Evaluating current ISM clause in DOE Contracts.

226

Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alton Strategic Environmental Group Alton Strategic Environmental Group New Port Richey, FL charles.alton@earthlink.net April 4, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Assistant General Counsel Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Dear Mr. Cohen: I have reviewed the Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued

227

Emerging principles of regulatory evolution  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...principles of regulatory evolution 10.1073/pnas.0700488104 Benjamin Prud'homme Nicolas Gompel Sean B. Carroll *Howard Hughes...1873 . 48 Protas ME Hersey C Kochanek D Zhou Y Wilkens H Jeffery WR Zon LI Borowsky R Tabin CJ ( 2006 ) Nat Genet 38 : 107...

Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel; Sean B. Carroll

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Threat Insight Quarterly Regulatory Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

X-Force ® Threat Insight Quarterly Regulatory Compliance www.iss.netwww.iss.net October 2006 #12 Risk Index ..............................................11 Future X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly Internet Security Systems X-Force® Threat Insight Quarterly > October 2006 ©2006 Internet Security Systems

229

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NRC's NRC's Integrated Strategy for NRC s Integrated Strategy for Spent Fuel Management Earl Easton 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 25, 2010 Road to Yucca Mountain * 20+ years of preparation for the licensing i review * DOE application received in June 2008 and accepted for review in September 2008 * President Obama pursues alternatives to Yucca Mountain * DOE motion to withdraw in March 2010 2 * DOE motion to withdraw in March 2010 * Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future 2 Growing Spent Fuel Inventory Cumulative Used Nuclear Fuel Scenarios 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 Metric Tons 3 - 50,000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Year Reference: Crozat, March 2010 Integrated Strategy * In response to the evolving national debate on spent fuel management strategy, NRC initiated a number of actions:

230

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review for Proposed Amendment 102 to the Fishery....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Regulatory Impact Review Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Establishing a Community Quota Entity

231

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INITIAL REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FOR PACIFIC COAST SALMON PLAN AND ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES, AND DE MINIMIS FISHING PROVISIONS REGULATORY IDENTIFIER NUMBER 0648-BA55 PREPARED........................................................................................................1 1.3 Plan Development Schedule and Council Advisory Committee Participation

232

EVALUATION REPORT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2 Attachment OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY OBJECTIVE To determine whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) unclassified cybersecurity program adequately...

233

Security Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Reviews | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security Security Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Reviews Security Enforcement Regulatory Assistance Reviews Documents Available for Download May 4, 2012 Enforcement Letter, CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC - SEL-2012-01 Issued to URS CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC, related to a Security Incident involving the Protection and Control of Classified Information at the East Tennessee Technology Park April 18, 2011 Preliminary Notice, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC, SEA-2011-01 Issued to Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC related to Classified Information Introduced into Unapproved Information Systems at the Idaho National Laboratory March 24, 2011 Settlement Agreement, Sandia Corporation - SSA-2011-01 Settlement Agreement between DOE/NNSA and Sandia Corporation for Adverse Classified Information Security Trend at Sandia National Laboratories

234

Restrospective Regulatory Review | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers (EERE)

received in response to DOE's RFIs are also posted below. DOE Plan and Update Reports DOE Preliminary Plan to Implement EO 13563 DOE Final Plan to Implement EO 13563 DOE EO...

235

Secretarial Review Draft REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review Draft REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW and FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For a proposed Regulatory Amendment to Implement Amendment 78 to the Fishery Management Plan for Gulf of Alaska Groundfish June 2009 #12;Post-delivery Transfers ­ Secretarial review draft June 2009 Central Gulf of Alaska

236

DOE Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Safety |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Safety DOE Headquarters Review Focuses on Improved LATA Kentucky Worker Safety July 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Kevin Dressman, director of the DOE Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement, addresses LATA Kentucky employees during a training session. The June regulatory assistance review was aimed at ensuring worker safety. Kevin Dressman, director of the DOE Office of Worker Safety and Health Enforcement, addresses LATA Kentucky employees during a training session. The June regulatory assistance review was aimed at ensuring worker safety. PADUCAH, Ky. - DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security headquarters representatives recently spent three days at the Paducah site helping EM cleanup contractor LATA Kentucky better identify and correct issues before

237

A description of dynamical graphs associated to elementary regulatory circuits  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......regulatory networks (regulatory graphs), as...for recent reviews, De Jong (2002...notion of cross-regulatory modules and a...2003)). We plan to study the...simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J. Comput......

E. Remy; B. Moss; C. Chaouiya; D. Thieffry

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

DOE-FLEX: DOE's Telework Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order establishes the requirements and responsibilities for the Departments telework program. Cancels DOE N 314.1.

2013-02-11T23:59:59.000Z

239

Building Regulatory Capacity for Change  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Regulatory Capacity for Regulatory Capacity for Change PRESENTED BY Sarah Spencer-Workman, LEED AP July 27, 2011 "How to identify and review laws relevant to buildings and find places and opportunities that can accept changes that would support building energy objectives" Presentation Highlights Rulemaking Community and Stakeholder Identification To Support Code Changes Engagement: Building Capacity for Change Pay It Forward RULEMAKING : Plan Development and Research of Laws Relevant to Buildings How is it conducted? 'Landscape' Review Key words or phrases to look for Identify "home rule" jurisdictions Update and review cycle built in 'Landscape' Review:

240

DOE F 473.2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB Control No.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(Administrative Update: 03/2013) SECURITY BADGE REQUEST 1910-1800 All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Burden Disclosure Statement on Reverse TO: Headquarters Physical Protection Team (J) Date: (K) U.S. CITIZEN? YES NO IF NO, COUNTRY (A) FROM: NAME (printed) AND SIGNATURE OF DOE SPONSOR HAVING LIAISON WITH APPLICANT (L) REQUEST APPLICANT BE ISSUED: DOE HEADQUARTERS SITE-SPECIFIC SECURITY BADGE (USED AT HQ ONLY) (CHECK ONE): "BAO" TO HQ Facilities "FOREIGN NATIONAL" (B) TITLE DIVISION/OFFICE DOE STANDARD SECURITY BADGE (Used at HQ AND Other DOE Sites): (CHECK ONE): "Q" "L" "BAO" (Also Check): OGA IPA

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." August 1, 2011 - 1:59pm Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) jointly submitted to Congress a required "Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response." Addthis Related Articles Implementation Proposal for The National Action Plan on Demand Response DOE and FERC Joint Public Statement on Back Stop Siting

242

State Regulatory Framework Will Most Likely Result in Robust CO2 Pipeline  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Regulatory Framework Will Most Likely Result in Robust CO2 State Regulatory Framework Will Most Likely Result in Robust CO2 Pipeline System, New Study Says State Regulatory Framework Will Most Likely Result in Robust CO2 Pipeline System, New Study Says February 1, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A private sector model with a state rather than Federal-based regulatory framework is the approach that will "most likely result in a robust CO2 [carbon dioxide] pipeline system" in the United States, according to a new report developed with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (DOE/NETL). However, a Federal role that "includes incentives to encourage the private construction of CO2 pipelines" would be an important factor in moving the concept forward, the study says.

243

Eco-burden in pavement maintenance: Effects from excess traffic growth and overload  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Road pavement is designed to support certain usage conditions. However, many abnormal usages above regulated level often happen. Excess traffic growth is considered as a factor influencing road life-performance. Overload phenomenon has also long been recognized as an unexpected force causing extreme decrease of road performance. This study investigates the eco-burden effect of road construction in its maintenance phase along with the influence of above factors in shortening road life-cycle. Because of that, life-cycle assessment (LCA) is used to calculate the eco-burden impact. Furthermore, they are two different options taken for pavement materials: hot-mix and recycled asphalt. They are compared in order to provide comprehensive investigation results for decision makers. Eco-Indicator 99 is used as the impact database in order to standardize calculation processes. Seven sections of Pantura (Pantai Utara North Beach) road, Indonesia, are picked up to be the case studies as a basis in understanding correlation between all factors to eco-burden impact in road maintenance. This study concludes that each of excess traffic growth and overload is positively correlated with the increase of eco-burden impact. The more extreme shortening of road life-cycle, the more eco-burden will be produced, and it will increase faster in polynomial functions. By looking at previous studies which tend to focus on eco-burden in ideal condition of road life-cycle, this study throws new light on the effects of abnormal phenomena on road usage which shorten pavement life-performance as well as increase eco-burden impacts.

Corinthias P.M. Sianipar; Kiyoshi Dowaki

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

DOE`s Innovative Treatment Remediation Demonstration Program accelerating the implementation of innovative technologies  

SciTech Connect

A program to help accelerate the adoption and implementation of new and innovative remediation technologies has been initiated by the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Environmental Restoration Program Office (EM40). Developed as a Public-Private Partnership program in cooperation with the US Environmental Protection Agency`s (EPA) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) and coordinated by Sandia National Laboratories, the Innovative Treatment Remediation Demonstration (ITRD) Program attempts to reduce many of the classic barriers to the use of new technologies by involving government, industry, and regulatory agencies in the assessment, implementation, and validation of innovative technologies. In this program, DOE facilities work cooperatively with EPA, industry, national laboratories, and state and federal regulatory agencies to establish remediation demonstrations using applicable innovative technologies at their sites. Selected innovative technologies are used to remediate small, one to two acre, sites to generate the full-scale and real-world operating, treatment performance, and cost data needed to validate these technologies and gain acceptance by industry and regulatory agencies, thus accelerating their use nationwide. Each ITRD project developed at a DOE site is designed to address a typical soil or groundwater contamination issue facing both DOE and industry. This includes sites with volatile organic compound (VOC), semi-VOC, heavy metal, explosive residue, and complex or multiple constituent contamination. Projects are presently underway at three DOE facilities, while additional projects are under consideration for initiation in FY96 at several additional DOE sites. A brief overview of the ITRD Program, program plans, and the status and progress of existing ITRD projects are reviewed in this paper.

Hightower, M.

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

DOE Seeks Further Public Input on How Best To Streamline Existing  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Further Public Input on How Best To Streamline Existing Further Public Input on How Best To Streamline Existing Regulations DOE Seeks Further Public Input on How Best To Streamline Existing Regulations December 7, 2011 - 12:34pm Addthis The Department of Energy (DOE) has announced a further step to implementing the President's Executive Order on Improving Regulatory Review. The Executive Order directs federal agencies to review existing regulations and determine whether they are still necessary and crafted effectively to solve current problems. Engaging the public in an open, transparent process is a crucial step in DOE's regulatory review process. Because public comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) issued in January were important in the development of DOE's plan for retrospective regulatory review, DOE issued a second RFI this week asking the public how

246

Energy Department Issues Draft Request For Proposal for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensed Facilities Procurement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Cincinnati The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Draft Request for Proposal (DRFP) for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Licensed Facilities procurement. The NRC Licensed Facilities procurement is one of the four procurements that resulted from the Idaho Site Office of Environmental Management Post FY 2015 Acquisition Planning.

247

Proposed Strategy to meet DOE Order 231  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page 1 Page 1 Proposed Strategy to meet DOE Order 231.1B, Preparation of Annual Site Environmental Reports Background The U.S. Department of Energy Office (DOE) of Legacy Management (LM) was established in 2003 to manage the Department's post-closure responsibilities at sites under LM's care and ensure the future protection of human health and the environment at those sites. The histories of the legacy sites vary, as does the regulatory regime under which the sites are managed. Long- term surveillance plans (LTSPs) are prepared for the majority of the sites. These LTSPs, which are available to the public, include site descriptions, information about site history, nature and extent of contamination, institutional controls, closeout condition of the site, present and future

248

About / FAQ | DOE PAGES  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

transition to a full release. DOE PAGESBeta represents DOE's response to the February 2013 Office of Science and Technology Policy memorandum that called on federal agencies to...

249

C:\Forms\DOE F 350.1.cdr  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0.1 0.1 (06-00) OMB Control No. 1910-0600 U.S. Department of Energy OMB Burden Disclosure Statement Operations Office DOE Contractor Location Prepared By (Type Name) Phone Date Expenditures of Funds from prior year salary increase fund - Period from to Planned Distributions of Funds - Salary Increase Fund - Period from to Other Increases Report here progression increases granted to non represented employees during the prior salary increase fund year. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments

250

To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

'J| 'J| MaryBeth Zinmerman 0212212001 10:37 AM ',U To: Joel Rubin/EE/DOE@DOE cc: Nancy Jeffery/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Old Chpt 2, new Chap 3 Can you work on answering the editor's questions on this? Forwarded by MaryBeth Zimmenman/EE/DOE on 22/2001 10:36 AM "'"- . . Michael York 02/21/2001 01:13 PM To: commcoll@aol.com cc: MaryBeth Zimmerman/EE/DOE@DOE Subject: Chapter 2 Joan, attached is the first chapter to edit. We will be sending you the next chapter as soon as it is available. If you have any questions, please call me at (202) 586-5669. Thanks! Michael York Chapter 2_Energy Impacts_2.16.01.d 22894 DOE024-0300 JOEL RUBIN 02/22/2001 03:00 PM To: Marybeth Zimmerman cc: Nancy Jeffery, Darrell Beschen/EE/DOE@DOE, Michael York Subject Chapter 2 Updates MBZ - This draft incorporates (in blue ink) updates based upon the comments from Joan. Ive deleted Joan's

251

Environmental Regulatory Compliance Plan for Site Characterization; Yucca Mountain Site, Nevada Research and Development Area, Nevada: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The DOE is committed to conduct its operations in an environmentally safe and sound manner, and will comply with applicable environmental statutes and regulations. These objectives are described in DOE Order 5400.1 (Environmental Protection Program Requirements). This document -- the Environmental Regulatory Compliance Plan (ERCP) -- is one method of implementing the policy set forth in DOE Order 5400.1 and the NWPA. The ERCP describes the plan by which the DOE will comply with applicable Federal environmental statutes and regulations. The ERCP also discusses how DOE will address State and local environmental statutes and regulations. 180 refs., 27 figs., 1 tab.

NONE

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18,...

253

Minimization of Blast furnace Fuel Rate by Optimizing Burden and Gas Distribution  

SciTech Connect

The goal of the research is to improve the competitive edge of steel mills by using the advanced CFD technology to optimize the gas and burden distributions inside a blast furnace for achieving the best gas utilization. A state-of-the-art 3-D CFD model has been developed for simulating the gas distribution inside a blast furnace at given burden conditions, burden distribution and blast parameters. The comprehensive 3-D CFD model has been validated by plant measurement data from an actual blast furnace. Validation of the sub-models is also achieved. The user friendly software package named Blast Furnace Shaft Simulator (BFSS) has been developed to simulate the blast furnace shaft process. The research has significant benefits to the steel industry with high productivity, low energy consumption, and improved environment.

Dr. Chenn Zhou

2012-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

254

Assistance to Oil and Gas State Agencies and Industry through Continuation of Environmental and Production Data Management and a Water Regulatory Initiative  

SciTech Connect

This grant project was a major step toward completion of the Risk Based Data Management System (RBDMS) project. Additionally the project addresses the needs identified during the projects initial phases. By implementing this project, the following outcomes were sought: (1) State regulatory agencies implemented more formalized environmental risk management practices as they pertain to the production of oil and gas, and injection via Class II wells. (2) Enhancement of oil and gas production by implementing a management system supporting the saving of abandoned or idle wells located in areas with a relatively low environmental risk of endangering underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) in a particular state. (3) Verification that protection of USDWs is adequate and additional restrictions of requirements are not necessary in areas with a relatively low environmental risk. (4) Standardization of data and information maintained by state regulatory agencies and decrease the regulatory cost burden on producers operating in multiple states, and (5) Development of a system for electronic data transfer among operators and state regulatory agencies and reduction of overall operator reporting burdens.

Grunewald, Ben; Arthur, Dan; Langhus, Bruce; Gillespie, Tom; Binder, Ben; Warner, Don; Roberts, Jim; Cox, D.O.

2002-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

255

Creating a Comprehensive, Efficient, and Sustainable Nuclear Regulatory Structure: A Process Report from the U.S. Department of Energy's Material Protection, Control and Accounting Program  

SciTech Connect

With the congressionally mandated January 1, 2013 deadline for the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Nuclear Material Protection, Control and Accounting (MPC&A) program to complete its transition of MPC&A responsibility to the Russian Federation, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) management directed its MPC&A program managers and team leaders to demonstrate that work in ongoing programs would lead to successful and timely achievement of these milestones. In the spirit of planning for successful project completion, the NNSA review of the Russian regulatory development process confirmed the critical importance of an effective regulatory system to a sustainable nuclear protection regime and called for an analysis of the existing Russian regulatory structure and the identification of a plan to ensure a complete MPC&A regulatory foundation. This paper describes the systematic process used by DOEs MPC&A Regulatory Development Project (RDP) to develop an effective and sustainable MPC&A regulatory structure in the Russian Federation. This nuclear regulatory system will address all non-military Category I and II nuclear materials at State Corporation for Atomic Energy Rosatom, the Federal Service for Ecological, Technological, and Nuclear Oversight (Rostechnadzor), the Federal Agency for Marine and River Transport (FAMRT, within the Ministry of Transportation), and the Ministry of Industry and Trade (Minpromtorg). The approach to ensuring a complete and comprehensive nuclear regulatory structure includes five sequential steps. The approach was adopted from DOEs project management guidelines and was adapted to the regulatory development task by the RDP. The five steps in the Regulatory Development Process are: 1) Define MPC&A Structural Elements; 2) Analyze the existing regulatory documents using the identified Structural Elements; 3) Validate the analysis with Russian colleagues and define the list of documents to be developed; 4) Prioritize and schedule the development of documents; 5) Identify and develop processes to measure effectiveness of regulations. Utilizing this process is resulting in an effective regulatory process that is understood and is being adopted by the four RF organizations. It is anticipated that the current regulatory development process will continue after U.S. support ends. Utilization of the systematic methodology will ensure regulatory development is based on required MPC&A structural elements and will support the continued maintenance and development of an effective regulatory base.

Wright, Troy L.; O'Brien, Patricia E.; Hazel, Michael J.; Tuttle, John D.; Cunningham, Mitchel E.; Schlegel, Steven C.

2010-08-11T23:59:59.000Z

256

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ITL  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

New Mexico New Mexico Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory (ITL), New Mexico, Site Other Regulatory Framework ITL_map ITL is a research facility originally created by the Atomic Energy Commission, a predecessor agency of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), to study respiratory health issues. In 1996, as a result of decreasing DOE funding for the type of work conducted at the laboratory, DOE awarded a Cooperative Agreement to the Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute (Lovelace) to assist them with converting the facility into a private-sector operation. Lovelace conducted remedial action in the early 1990s and completed cleanup at several sites in 1997. Property transfer legislation passed on March 30, 2009, will result in the transfer of ITL property title from DOE to Lovelace. The legislation, once property transfer occurs, will also release DOE from all environmental liability at the ITL site, including contamination from past, present, or future activities. The DOE Office of Legacy Management is responsible for historic government-owned records management and long-term groundwater monitoring at the facility. For more information about the ITL site, view the fact sheet.

257

DOE Lessons Learned  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE Lessons Learned Information Services Catches the Eye of Corporations and Educational Institutions

258

DOE Approved Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The DOE Technical Standards Program promotes the use of voluntary consensus standards at DOE, manages and facilitates DOE's efforts to develop and maintain necessary technical standards, and communicates information on technical standards activities to people who develop or use technical standards in DOE.

259

DOE International Energy Advisors  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOEs Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's (OE) Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration Division (ISER) has coordinated and executed interagency support agreements with five of the geographic Combatant Commands to assign a DOE representative a DOE Energy Advisor to each of their headquarters.

260

DOE-FLEX: DOE's Telework Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The directive establishes the requirements and responsibilities for the Departments telework program. Canceled by DOE O 314.1.

2011-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review DOE's Petition for Interlocutory Review Proceeding before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on DOE's application for a license to construct a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; DOE moves for interlocutory review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's order suspending briefing and consideration of DOE's motion to withdraw its application. Yucca Mountain - U.S. Department of Energy's Petition for Interlocutory Review More Documents & Publications Motion to Withdraw from Yucca Mountain application U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REVIEW AND REVERSAL OF THE BOARD'S RULING ON THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW Yucca Mountain - U.S. Department of Energy's Brief in Support of Review and

262

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building approved-doe-technical-standards Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 205851.800.dial.DOE en DOE-STD-1150-2013 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1150-2013 doe-std-1150-2013" class="title-link">DOE-STD-1150-2013

263

Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and the Federal Reliability and the Federal and the Federal Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Energy Regulatory Commission Commission Michael Peters Michael Peters Energy Infrastructure & Cyber Security Advisor Energy Infrastructure & Cyber Security Advisor Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 202 202 - - 502 502 - - 8461 8461 Michael.Peters@FERC.GOV Michael.Peters@FERC.GOV The views expressed in this The views expressed in this presentation do not represent the presentation do not represent the views of the Federal Energy views of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or the United Regulatory Commission or the United States. States. These views are the personal opinion These views are the personal opinion of Mike Peters!!!! of Mike Peters!!!! ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺ ☺

264

Grand Gulf-prioritization of regulatory requirements  

SciTech Connect

As cost pressures mount, Grand Gulf nuclear station (GGNS) is relying increasingly on various prioritization approaches to implement, modify, eliminate, or defer regulatory requirements. Regulatory requirements can be prioritized through the use of three measures: (1) safety (or risk) significance; (2) cost; and (3) public policy (or political) significance. This paper summarizes GGNS' efforts to implement solutions to regulatory issues using these three prioritization schemes to preserve a balance between cost and safety benefit.

Meisner, M.J. (Entergy Operations Inc., Port Gibson, MS (United States))

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

Three Mile Island waste management: a DOE Perspective  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) is conducting waste management research and development activities which are applicable to the cleanup of the Three Mile Island-Unit 2 nuclear reactor. These activities have enabled DOE to provide timely assistance to General Public Utilities (GPU), the utility owner, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the State of Pennsylvania in their efforts to quickly and safely clean up the damaged reactor. The DOE has been particularly active in evaluating proposed cleanup systems, providing information on waste characteristics, and advising GPU and NRC as to appropriate disposal methods for the waste generated during the cleanup. A description and discussion of some of these activities is presented.

D'Ambrosia, J.T.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

Federal / State Legislative & Regulatory Changes Required for...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Issues Federal and State Blending Restrictions Action by ASTM NCWM to address higher ethanol blends Federal State Legislative & Regulatory Changes Required for Introduction of...

267

Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Nanomedicine  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Ethical and regulatory aspects are important in practice of medicine, and the same applies to nanomedicine. As has happened with introduction of all...

Kewal K. Jain

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

Other Regulatory Efforts | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Efforts Other Regulatory Efforts In addition to regulating international electricity trade, the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability participates in other...

269

Final Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Amendment 93 to the Fishery  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Final Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis analyzing proposed management measures that would apply for Amendment 93 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska Chinook Salmon Prohibited

270

DOE - Safety of Radioactive Material Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Emergency Response Effects of Radiation History Gallery Glossary of Nuclear Terms [Majority from NRC] Contacts Comments & Questions Agencies U. S. Department of Transportation (DOT), U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Postal Services (USPS) U. S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Conference of State Legislatures - Environment, Energy and Transportation Program, Hazardous and Radioactive Materials International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regulations Code of Federal Regulations: Title 10 - Energy Code of Federal Regulations: Title 10, PART 71 - Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material Code of Federal Regulations: Title 49 - Transportation Code of Federal Regulations: Title 49, PART 173 - Shippers - General

271

Increasing atmospheric burden of ethanol in the United States J. A. de Gouw,1,2  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Increasing atmospheric burden of ethanol in the United States J. A. de Gouw,1,2 J. B. Gilman,1,2 A; revised 25 June 2012; accepted 1 July 2012; published 4 August 2012. [1] The use of ethanol 10% ethanol. In accordance with this increased use, atmospheric measurements of volatile organic

Goldstein, Allen

272

Statement of Work, DOE-wide NEPA Contracts (2002)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WORK WORK PREPARATION AND REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS, ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION During the next five years, the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Program and Field Offices nationwide, including the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and their offices, will require contractor support services for the preparation of environmental impact statements (EISs) and environmental assessments (EAs) prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and environmental reports (ERs) and other documentation required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in its review of license applications. Contractor support services will be required also

273

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 AUG i 3 1979 ,,~---Y--*. FCAF:Wi3 )I 70-364 : i: SNM-414,jAmendment No. 3 --A Babcock and Wilcox Company Nuclear Materials Division ATTN: Mr. Michael A. Austin Manager, Technical Control 609 North Warren Avenue Apollo, Pennsylvania 15613 Gentiemen: (1 i' \ (. \ In accordance with your application dated June 18, 1979, and pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 70, Materials License SNM-414 is hereby amended to: 1. Delete the function of the Regulatory Projects Coordinator, and 2. Alter the experience requirements for the function of Licensing and Nuclear Safety Specialist. Replacement pages for the license and condition section of the application are attached. Included are changes to License SNM-414 pages to reflect

274

IEP - Carbon Dioxide: Regulatory Drivers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IEP - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Regulatory Drivers In July 7, 2009 testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu made the following statements:1 "...Overwhelming scientific evidence shows that carbon dioxide from human activity has increased the atmospheric level of CO2 by roughly 40 percent, a level one- third higher than any time in the last 800,000 years. There is also a consensus that CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions have caused our planet to change. Already, we have seen the loss of about half of the summer arctic polar ice cap since the 1950s, a dramatically accelerating rise in sea level, and the loss of over two thousand cubic miles of glacial ice, not on geological time scales but over a mere hundred years.

275

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

qU oSoLTJRC qU oSoLTJRC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Protecting People and the Environment NUREG-1872, Vol. 2 HudcD [jE©wftamfsýýpc Wafm(M oran EA Office of New Reactors AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room at http:t/www.nrc..ov/reading-rm.html. Publicly released records include, to name a few, NUREG-series publications; Federal Register notices; applicant, licensee, and vendor documents and correspondence; NRC correspondence and internal memoranda; bulletins and information notices; inspection and investigative reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers and their attachments.

276

REGULATORY CONCEPTS ON SUSTAINABILITY GOALS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of alternative fuels needed to substantially reduce petroleum use in California carries the risk of encouraging no legal liability for the information in this paper; nor does any party represent that the uses communities can enjoy the economic benefits of replacing petroleum with alternative fuel. After extensive

277

Health Impacts from Urban Air Pollution in China: The Burden to the Economy and the Benefits of Policy  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Health Impacts from Urban Air Pollution in China: The Burden to the Economy and the Benefits and Policy Program #12;2 #12;Health Impacts from Urban Air Pollution in China: The Burden to the Economy, elevated levels of urban air pollution result in significant adverse health impacts for its large

278

Systemic Administration of a Conditionally Replicating Adenovirus, Targeted to Angiogenesis, Reduced Lung Metastases Burden in Cotton Rats  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Reduced Lung Metastases Burden in Cotton Rats Michael Peled 1 2 4 Aviv Shaish 1 2 Avi...AdPPE3x-E1 was also tested in a cotton rat lung metastases model. Results: The replication...reduced the lung metastases burden in a cotton rat model by 55, compared with saline-treated...

Michael Peled; Aviv Shaish; Avi Katav; Shoshana Greenberger; Iris Barshack; Reshef Tal; Livnat Bangio; Eyal Breitbart; Dror Harats

2009-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

279

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: Colorado Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry Colorado Colorado Meeting Kyoung 21 Mar 2013 - 10:24 Blog entry Colorado Happy New Year! Kyoung 21 Mar 2013 - 10:09 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load)

280

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: FY12 Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry FY12 Thank You! Kyoung 21 Mar 2013 - 08:40 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation: XID: 2142253755

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: CX Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry CX Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Kyoung 14 Oct 2013 - 20:19 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation:

282

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: feedback Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry feedback Geothermal Stakeholder Feedback on the GRR Kyoung 21 Mar 2013 - 10:01 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load)

283

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: Fish and Wildlife Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry Fish and Wildlife Idaho Meeting #2 Kyoung 4 Sep 2012 - 21:36 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load)

284

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: EIS Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry EIS Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Kyoung 14 Oct 2013 - 20:19 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation:

285

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: Database Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry Database Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Kyoung 14 Oct 2013 - 20:19 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load)

286

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: Cost Recovery Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry Cost Recovery GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Kyoung 9 Jul 2013 - 20:57 Blog entry Cost Recovery GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Kyoung 2 May 2013 - 14:06 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers

287

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: flora and fauna Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry flora and fauna Texas Legal Review Alevine 29 Jul 2013 - 14:46 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load)

288

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: Categorical Exclusions Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry Categorical Exclusions Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Kyoung 14 Oct 2013 - 20:19 Blog entry Categorical Exclusions GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Kyoung 9 Jul 2013 - 20:57 Blog entry Categorical Exclusions GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Kyoung 2 May 2013 - 14:06 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review

289

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: EA Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry EA Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Kyoung 14 Oct 2013 - 20:19 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation:

290

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: analysis Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry analysis GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Kyoung 9 Jul 2013 - 20:57 Blog entry analysis GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Kyoung 2 May 2013 - 14:06 Blog entry analysis Happy New Year! Kyoung 21 Mar 2013 - 10:09 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers:

291

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: FWS Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry FWS Idaho Meeting #2 Kyoung 4 Sep 2012 - 21:36 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation: XID: 2142253965

292

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Term: BHFS Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry BHFS Texas Legal Review Alevine 29 Jul 2013 - 14:46 Blog entry BHFS Happy New Year! Kyoung 21 Mar 2013 - 10:09 Blog entry BHFS Legal Reviews are Underway Kyoung 21 Mar 2013 - 09:17 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill

293

DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Administered by the HSS Office of Corporate Safety Programs, the DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program (DOELAP) is responsible for implementing performance standards for DOE contractor external dosimetry and radiobioassay programs through periodic performance testing and on-site program assessments.

294

Approved DOE Technical Standards  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

ehss908241 Approved DOE Technical Standards en DOE-STD-3009-2014 http:energy.govehssdownloadsdoe-std-3009-2014

295

DOE G 414  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE)...

296

2012 DOE Sustainability Awards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

In 2012, DOE Sustainability Awards recognized 20 teams and individuals representing DOE national laboratories for their outstanding sustainability contributions, including accomplishments in managing pollution, waste, energy, water, and vehicle fleets.

297

Completed DOE Technical Standards  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Completed) Completed) Project Number Title Document ID SLM / ORG Author / Phone / Email Status / Review Date P1020-2002REV National Phenomena hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for DOE Facilities DOE-STD-1020-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30) P1066-1999REV Fire Protection and Emergency Services Program and Design Criteria (revision to DOE-STD-1066-99) DOE-STD-1066-2012 James O'Brien (HS-30)

298

Extension of DOE Directives  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Notice extends the following directives until 2/16/04: DOE N 205.2, Foreign National Access to DOE Cyber Systems, and DOE N 205.3, Password Generation, Protection, and Use, dated 11/23/99-7/1/00.

2003-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

299

EFCOG / DOE Electrical Safety  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of electrical hazards used in the DOE Electrical Safety Handbook and laboratory programs. Thus, portionsEFCOG / DOE Electrical Safety Improvement Project Project Area 4 ­Performance Measurement personnel. This tool is also intended to assist DOE organizations in determining and classifying ORPS

300

DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-1092 and others guidance for the "Analyze the Hazard" step of DOE's Integrated Safety Management (ISM

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

DOE Awards WIPP Independent Oversight Contract  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Anne Wickham Anne Wickham (513) 246-0463) Dennis Hurtt (505) 234-7327 http://www.wipp.ws U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Waste Isolation Pilot Plant P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221 DOENews For Immediate Release DOE Awards WIPP Independent Oversight Contract Cincinnati, Ohio, October 7, 2005 - Today the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the award of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Independent Oversight contract to Pecos Management Services, Incorporated (Pecos) of Albuquerque, N.M. The contract is effective October 7, 2005, and contains a one year base with four one-year options. It is valued at approximately $4.5 million over the five-year period. Pecos has teamed with the Institute for Regulatory Science of Columbia, Md., to form the

302

DOE/EIS-0476 Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4 Burke County, Georgia Final Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG-1872 and NUREG-1947, Adopted as DOE/EIS-0476 U.S. Department of Energy February 2012 Lead Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Title: Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4, Burke County, Georgia (Adopted) DOE/EIS-0476 Contact: For additional copies or more information on this Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), please contact: Mr. Matthew McMillen U.S. Department of Energy Loan Programs Office (LP-10) 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Phone: 202-586-7248

303

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Columbus  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Columbus, Ohio, Sites Columbus, Ohio, Sites Other Regulatory Framework columbusClosure2013 The Columbus, Ohio, Sites consist of two separate properties owned by the Battelle Memorial Institute: the King Avenue site, located in the city of Columbus, and the West Jefferson site, located approximately 15 miles west of Columbus. Battelle conducted extensive nuclear research at both locations for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies between 1943 and 1986. The facilities have been decontaminated and released for unrestricted use. Responsibility for maintaining records for the Columbus sites transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2008. The sites require records management and stakeholder support. For more information about the Columbus sites, view the fact sheet.

304

DOE - Safety of Radioactive Material Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

What are the requirements? What are the requirements? Safety Record Radioactive material has been shipped in the U. S. for more than 50 years with no occurrences of death or serious injury from exposure of the contents of these shipments. Hazardous Material Shipments for 1 Year Internationally 300 million United States 3 million DOE <1% or 5,000 (out of 3 million) [U.S. DOE NTP, 1999, Transporting Radioactive Materials] All radioactive shipments are regulated by the Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Since transport accidents cannot be prevented, the regulations are primarily designed to: Insure safety in routine handling situations for minimally hazardous material Insure integrity under all circumstances for highly dangerous materials

305

DOE Hydrogen Pipeline Working Group Workshop  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Pipeline Pipeline Working Group Workshop August 31, 2005 Augusta, Georgia Hydrogen Pipeline Experience Presented By: LeRoy H. Remp Lead Project Manager Pipeline Projects ppt00 3 Hydrogen Pipeline - Scope of Presentation Only those systems that are regulated by DOT in the US, DOT delegated state agency, or other federal regulatory authority. Cross property of third party and/or public properties for delivery to customers. Does not include in-plant or in-house hydrogen piping. Does not include piping (aboveground or underground) that delivers to a customer if all property is owned and controlled by Air Products and the customer. ppt00 4 Pipeline Photos ppt00 5 Pipeline Photos ppt00 6 Pipeline Photos ppt00 7 Pipeline Photos ppt00 8 Pipeline Photos ppt00 9 Overview of North American

306

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review/Environmental Assessment/  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review/Environmental Assessment/ Initial Regulatory............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW Flexibility Analysis for Proposed Amendment 92 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea

307

Regulatory factors for the assembly of thylakoid membrane protein complexes  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...light and its conversion into chemical energy in oxygenic...known regulatory factors are conserved...Regulatory factors for the assembly...light and its conversion into chemical energy in oxygenic...known regulatory factors are conserved...

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Revision to the Record of Decision for the Department of Energy's Waste Management Program: Treatment and Storage of Transuranic Waste (DOE/EIS-0200) (12/29/00)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

985 985 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 251 / Friday, December 29, 2000 / Notices collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment. The Department of Education is especially interested in public comment addressing the following issues: (1) Is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: December 22, 2000. John Tressler, Leader, Regulatory Information Management,

309

Record of Decision; JEA Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustor Project, Jacksonville, Duval County, FL (DOE/EIS-0289) (12/7/00)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

614 614 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 236 / Thursday, December 7, 2000 / Notices Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment. Dated: December 1, 2000. John Tressler, Leader Regulatory Information Management, Office of the Chief Information Officer. Office of Educational Research and Improvement Type of Review: New. Title: Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS 2002). Frequency: Annually. Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local, or Tribal Gov't, SEAs or LEAs. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 51,597. Burden Hours: 59,497. Abstract: Year 2001 field test of 50 schools in five states, students, parents, teachers, and librarians. The main study in Spring 2002 in all 50 states and District of Columbia will constitute the baseline of a longitudinal study of

310

Record of Decision for the Treatment and Management of Sodium-Bonded Spent Nuclear Fuel ( (DOE/EIS-0306) (9/19/00)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

65 65 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 19, 2000 / Notices Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment. The Department of Education is especially interested in public comment addressing the following issues: (1) Is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: September 13, 2000. John Tressler, Leader, Regulatory Information Management, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

311

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certifies HalfPACT Transportation Container  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certifies U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certifies HalfPACT Transportation Container CARLSBAD, N.M., November 20, 2000 - The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Certificate of Compliance November 2 for the HalfPACT transportation container. The HalfPACT will be used to supplement the Transuranic Package Transporter Model 2 (TRUPACT-II) for transportation of waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The TRUPACT-II is currently used for transportation of waste to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The new container is approximately 30 inches shorter than the TRUPACT-II. The HalfPACT is designed to carry seven 55-gallon drums weighing up to 1,000 pounds each, but is also capable of carrying one standard waste box or four 85-gallon drums.

312

GRR/Section 9-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 9-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process GRR/Section 9-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process 09-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Department of Energy Council on Environmental Quality United States Environmental Protection Agency Regulations & Policies National Environmental Policy Act 10 CFR § 1021 - DOE NEPA Regulations Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 09-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process.pdf 09-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process.pdf 09-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative Whenever the Department of Energy (DOE) considers funding, licensing, or

313

DOE ISM CHAMPIONS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9/27/12 9/27/12 DOE ISM CHAMPIONS Organization Points of Contact Phone E-mail DOE ISM Co- Champion (HSS) Pat Worthington (301) 903-5926 pat.worthington@hq.doe.gov DOE ISM Co- Champion (EM) Ray Corey (509) 376-0108 ray_j_corey@rl.gov Ames Cindy Baebler (630) 252-1563 cynthia.baebler@ch.doe.gov Argonne Joanna M. Livengood (630) 252-2366 joanna.livengood@ch.doe.gov Brookhaven Bob Desmarais (631) 344-5434 rdesmarais@bnl.gov CBFO Josef A. Sobieraj (575) 234-7499 Josef.sobieraj@wipp.ws CDNS Don F. Nichols (202) 586-8216 don.nichols@nnsa.doe.gov Chicago Justin Zamirowski (630) 252-2248 justin.zamirowski@ch.doe.gov CNS-Energy Chip Lagdon (301) 903-4218 (202) 586-0799 chip.lagdon@hq.doe.gov EE Gary Staffo (202) 586-9577 gary.staffo@ee.doe.gov EM James A. Hutton (202) 586-0975 james.hutton@em.doe.gov

314

DOE Patents Database - FAQ's  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Why was this database developed and by whom? How is this collection different than the one at the United States Patent and Trademark Office? What are the criteria for including patent records in this collection? How do you determine these patents were sponsored by DOE? How many patents are in this collection? Does the collection include all of DOE's patents? Does this collection include the full text for each patent? What time frame is covered by DOepatents? How often is this collection and Web site updated? Does the U.S. Government have exclusive rights to these inventions? What is OSTI? Where can I find information about doing business with DOE? How can I find additional information on the patenting process? Where can I find patents that are not related to DOE?

315

DOE Information Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Information Center DOE Information Center The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Center provides citizens a consolidated facility to obtain information and records related to the DOE's various programs in Oak Ridge and abroad. Employees at the DOE Information Center are available to assist with your requests and searches from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through Friday, except for federal holidays. Requests Documents can be requested in person or by telephone, email, or fax. Reproduction Please allow DOE Information Center staff adequate time to reproduce documents. Some material requires special handling, security reviews, etc. Delivery Unless special arrangements have been made with DOE Information Center staff, documents should be picked up during normal business hours.

316

Regulatory analysis technical evaluation handbook. Final report  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Handbook is to provide guidance to the regulatory analyst to promote preparation of quality regulatory analysis documents and to implement the policies of the Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG/BR-0058 Rev. 2). This Handbook expands upon policy concepts included in the NRC Guidelines and translates the six steps in preparing regulatory analyses into implementable methodologies for the analyst. It provides standardized methods of preparation and presentation of regulatory analyses, with the inclusion of input that will satisfy all backfit requirements and requirements of NRC`s Committee to Review Generic Requirements. Information on the objectives of the safety goal evaluation process and potential data sources for preparing a safety goal evaluation is also included. Consistent application of the methods provided here will result in more directly comparable analyses, thus aiding decision-makers in evaluating and comparing various regulatory actions. The handbook is being issued in loose-leaf format to facilitate revisions. NRC intends to periodically revise the handbook as new and improved guidance, data, and methods become available.

NONE

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

317

DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory Committee DOE Announces Publication of Three Reports by the DOE Electricity Advisory Committee January 15, 2009 -...

318

DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements DOE Testing Reveals Samsung Refrigerator Does Not Meet Energy Star Requirements March 16, 2010 - 4:28pm...

319

Regulatory Roadmap Workshop for Federal Bulk Transmission Regulations...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Regulatory Roadmapping Pgower's picture Submitted by Pgower(45) Member 7 August, 2014 - 13:19 One-day workshop to review regulatory roadmaps for bulk transmission. Date:...

320

Energy Department Develops Regulatory Roadmap to Spur Geothermal Energy Development  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Energy Department today issued a Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap that will help developers navigate regulatory requirements at every level of government to deploy geothermal energy projects.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory Test Exercise...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory Test Exercise: Output Report Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory...

322

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) | Department...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) "List of Covered Electric Utilities" under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) The Energy Policy...

323

Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the First United States Nuclear Plant Site in Over 30 Years Energy Praises the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Approval of the...

324

DOE Science Showcase - Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases Featured Climate Change Research from DOE Databases Search Results from DOE Databases View research documents, citations, accomplishments, patents, and projects related to climate change, one of the primary scientific challenges addressed through the Incite Program. Climate Change Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Climate Modeling Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Ocean Turbulence and Climate Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Cloud Simulation and Models Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE Accomplishments Database DOE Data Explorer Global Warming Information Bridge Energy Citations Database

325

DOE Joint Genome Institute: Next Gen Sequencing Technology Pinpoint  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

February 12, 2009 February 12, 2009 Next Gen Sequencing Technology Pinpoint "On-Off Switches" in Genomes WALNUT CREEK, CA-Scientists from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and the University of California, San Diego have developed a set of molecular tools that provide important insight into the complex genomes of multicellular organisms. The strategy promises to clarify the longstanding mystery of the role played by vast stretches of DNA sequence that do not code for the functional units-genes-that nevertheless may have a powerful regulatory influence. The research is described in the 12 February edition of the journal Nature. DOE bioenergy researchers have an interest in identifying these regulatory

326

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Energy Regulatory Commission Energy Regulatory Commission Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Name Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Address 888 First Street, N.E. Place Washington, District of Columbia Zip 20426 Phone number 1-866-208-3676 Website http://www.ferc.gov/contact-us Coordinates 38.90145°, -77.006248° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":38.90145,"lon":-77.006248,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

327

Legal and Regulatory | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Legal and Regulatory Legal and Regulatory Legal and Regulatory Below are resources for Tribes on legal and regulatory issues. A Guide to Community Solar: Utility, Private, and Non-Profit Project Development A resource for community solar project development aimed at community organizers, solar advocates, government officials, and utility managers. Provides information on various community solar project models (utility-sponsored, special purpose entities, non-profits), state policies that support community solar projects (group billing, virtual net metering, joint ownership), and tax policies and incentives. Source: U.S. Department of Energy. An Introduction to Geothermal Permitting This guide tracks the geothermal permitting process through multiple levels, addressing such issues as the importance of where the geothermal

328

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Groups > Groups > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds There are no feeds from external sites for this group. Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load)

329

Regulatory Commission of Alaska | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Regulatory Commission of Alaska Regulatory Commission of Alaska Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Regulatory Commission of Alaska Name Regulatory Commission of Alaska Address 701 West Eight Ave., Suite 300 Place Anchorage, Alaska Zip 99501-3469 Phone number 907-276-6222 Website http://rca.alaska.gov/RCAWeb/h Coordinates 61.2143463°, -149.8931523° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":61.2143463,"lon":-149.8931523,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

330

Regulatory roles of endothelial cells in cancer  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This thesis describes the biochemical regulatory impact of endothelial cells, the cells that line all blood vessels, in cancer. Our work draws from concepts in vascular repair and tissue engineering and extends the view ...

Franses, Joseph W. (Joseph Wang)

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Evolution and statistics of biological regulatory networks  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In this thesis, I study the process of evolution of the gene regulatory network in Escherichia coli. First, I characterize the portion of the network that has been documented, and then I simulate growth of the network. In ...

Chandalia, Juhi Kiran, 1979-

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

UNIT NAME : KOW STANDPIPE REGULATORY STATUS: AOC  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

093 UNIT NUMBER: 182 Pg 1 of 2 UNIT NAME : KOW STANDPIPE REGULATORY STATUS: AOC LOCATION: Outside plant security fence, southwest of C-611. 3 feet high by 3 feet in diameter....

333

Reliability and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Presentationgiven at the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Fall 2008 meetingcovers the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) strategic plan, the Federal Power Act (FPA), current energy security posture, and more.

334

EIA - Natural Gas Pipeline Network - Regulatory Authorities  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Regulatory Authorities Regulatory Authorities About U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines - Transporting Natural Gas based on data through 2007/2008 with selected updates U.S. Natural Gas Regulatory Authorities Beginning | Regulations Today | Coordinating Agencies | Regulation of Mergers and Acquisitions Beginning of Industry Restructuring In April 1992, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued its Order 636 and transformed the interstate natural gas transportation segment of the industry forever. Under it, interstate natural gas pipeline companies were required to restructure their operations by November 1993 and split-off any non-regulated merchant (sales) functions from their regulated transportation functions. This new requirement meant that interstate natural gas pipeline companies were allowed to only transport natural gas for their customers. The restructuring process and subsequent operations have been supervised closely by FERC and have led to extensive changes throughout the interstate natural gas transportation segment which have impacted other segments of the industry as well.

335

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap > Posts by term Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds 1031 regulations (1) Alaska (1) analysis (3) appropriations (1) BHFS (3) Categorical Exclusions (3) citation (1) citing (1) Colorado (2) Coordinating Permit Office (2) Cost Mechanisms (2) Cost Recovery (2) CX (1) D.C. (1) data (1) Database (1) developer (2) EA (1) EIS (1) endangered species (1) Fauna (1) feedback (1) Fish and Wildlife (1) Flora (1) flora and fauna (1) 1 2 3 next › last » Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12)

336

DOE G 414  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INITIATED BY: INITIATED BY: http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

337

DOE G 414  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

http://www.directives.doe.gov Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE G 414.1-4 Approved 6-17-05 Certified 11-3-10 SAFETY SOFTWARE GUIDE for USE with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and are not construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, D.C. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 414.1-4 i (and ii) 6-17-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Guide is approved by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health and is available for use by all DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration

338

DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy. doeresponseschallengehomecomments.pdf More Documents & Publications Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) DOE...

339

JGI - DOE Mission Relevance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

User Programs User Programs Project Management Office Community Science Program Emerging Technologies Opportunity Program Technology Development Pilot Program Genomic Encyc. of Bacteria and Archaea MyJGI: Information for Collaborators DOE Mission Relevance CSP | Overview | How to Propose a Project | Review Process | DOE Relevance Proposal Schedule | FAQ The Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI) is managed by the Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research (OBER) to produce high-throughput DNA sequencing and analysis in support of its missions in alternative energy, global carbon cycling, and biogeochemistry. These areas mirror DOE and national priorities to develop abundant sources of clean energy, to control greenhouse gas accumulation in

340

DOE Public Reading Room  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

environmental and waste management, and site-specific concerns. The INL Research Library provides access to information, staffing, and research assistance for the DOE Reading...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

DOE Explosives Safety Manual  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Manual describes DOE's explosives safety requirements applicable to operations involving the development, testing, handling, and processing of explosives or assemblies containing explosives.

1996-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

342

Energy Innovations DOE Meeting  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Leo Breton, representing Energy Innovations of Washington, DC, a small company engaged in improving the energy efficiency of appliances, automobiles, and HVAC systems, requested a meeting with DOE...

343

DOE MENTOR-PROTG  

Energy Savers (EERE)

provided. * Equipping small businesses and minority institutions of higher with the knowledge, skills and capabilities needed to successfully compete for DOE prime contracts. *...

344

DOE General Competencies  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The DOE General Competencies are the personal and professional attributes that are critical to successful performance. A competency model is a collection of competencies that together define...

345

DOE/ID-Number  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

work order DOE Department of Energy EMC electromagnetic compatibility EMI electromagnetic interference EPRI Electric Power Research Institute eWP electronic work package HVAC...

346

the DOE ISMS Review  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

* Corrective action management * Environmental management * Commercial grade dedication * Conduct of operations "This ISMS review by DOE goes beyond ensuring that we have a...

347

DOE/ID-Number  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

procedures CBWO computer-based work order CCV correct component verification CNS Catawba Nuclear Station DOE Department of Energy HVAC heating, venting, and air conditioning I&C...

348

DOE Corporate Overview - 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy, 2012 Section One, page 1 U.S. Department of Energy, 2012 Section One, page 1 SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Welcome to the Department of Energy. This book provides an overview of the Department of Energy (DOE). The opening sections describe the mission areas, organizational structure and upcoming critical issues of the Department, followed by brief descriptions of DOE's goals and programs. Later sections provide overviews of the Department's budget, staffing, contract management, project management, Congressional jurisdiction, Government Accountability Office (GAO) and DOE's Inspector General (IG) oversight and DOE high-visibility

349

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (August 9, 2013) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects reviewed the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington's (Snohomish PUD) application for a 10-year license for the proposed Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project No. 12690, which would be located in Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, near the City of Port Townsend, in Island County, Washington, and has prepared a final environmental assessment (FEA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE/EA-1949). In the FEA, Commission staff analyzed the potential environmental effects of

350

FROM: FRANK MARCINOWSKI DEPUTY ASSISTANT S TECHNICAL AND REGULATORY SUPPORT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2012 , 2012 FROM: FRANK MARCINOWSKI DEPUTY ASSISTANT S TECHNICAL AND REGULATORY SUPPORT SUBJECT: Annual National Environmental Policy Act Planning Summary This memorandum transmits the 2012 Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) Planning Summary for NEP A documents anticipated for the Office of Environmental Management (EM), Headquarters. The attached Summary contains data on environmental impact statements only. At this time, we do not expect Headquarters actions to warrant other NEP A reviews; if this should change during the year, we will, of course, work with your office to comply with all NEP A requirements as appropriate. In that the DOE NEP A Order provides for Field Managers to submit Annual NEP A Planning Summaries directly to your office, we are preparing a compilation of all NEP A

351

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (January 15, 2013) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects reviewed the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington's (Snohomish PUD) application for a 10-year pilot license for the proposed Admiralty Inlet Tidal Project No. 12690, which would be located in Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound, near the City of Port Townsend, in Island County, Washington, and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE/EA-1949). In the EA, Commission staff analyzed the potential environmental effects of constructing and

352

DOE F 473.2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB Control No.  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(01/2006) 1910-1800 All Other Editions Are Obsolete SECURITY BADGE REQUEST OMB Burden Disclosure Statement on Reverse TO: Headquarters Physical Protection Team (J) DATE: (K) U.S. CITIZEN? O YES O NO IF NO, COUNTRY (A) FROM: NAME (printed) AND SIGNATURE OF DOE SPONSOR ( U.S. C EN Y N I N HAVING LIAISON WITH APPLICANT (L) REQUEST APPLICANT BE ISSUED: 0 DOE HEADQUARTERS SITE-SPECIFIC SECURITY BADGE iUsed at HO ONLY) (Check One): 0 "BAO" TO HQ Facilities O "FOREIGN NATIONAL' El DOE STANDARD SECURITY BADGE (Used at HQ AND Other DOE Sites): (B) TITLE DIVISION/OFFICE (Check One): 0 "0" 0"L' 0 "BAO" (Also Check): 0 OGA OIPA I certify that the applicant requires access to a DOE HQS facility to (M) BADGE AT: l FORSTL [ GTN

353

Microsoft Word - Qualcomm Comments on DOE NBP RFI v.2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DC 20585 DC 20585 In the Matter of National Broadband Plan (NBP) RFI: Communications Requirements COMMENTS OF QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Dean R. Brenner Vice President, Government Affairs John W. Kuzin Senior Director, Regulatory 1730 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 850 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 263-0020 Dated: July 12, 2010 SUMMARY Qualcomm is pleased to provide these detailed comments to the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") on how current and future wireless broadband communications capabilities can support the energy management needs of electric utilities, businesses, and consumers, which include requirements for the evolving and growing Smart Grid. The DOE should be applauded for timely following-up on the recommendations in the Federal

354

2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan 2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan The 2012 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan embodies DOE's...

355

DOE Radiation Records Contacts List  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE radiation records contact list for individuals to obtain records of occupational exposure directly from a DOE site.

356

DOE-STD-1098-99 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

99 99 DOE-STD-1098-99 January 26, 2005 Radiological Control It is the policy of DOE to conduct its radiological operations in a manner that ensures the health and safety of all its employees, contractors, and the general public. In achieving this objective, the Department shall ensure that radiation exposures to its workers and the public and releases of radioactivity to the environment are maintained below regulatory limits and deliberate efforts are taken to further reduce exposures and releases as low as reasonably achievable. The Department is fully committed to implementing a radiological control program of the highest quality that consistently reflects this policy. DOE-STD-1098-99, Radiological Control More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-1098-2008

357

DOE Announces Loan Guarantee Applications for Nuclear Power Plant  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Announces Loan Guarantee Applications for Nuclear Power Plant DOE Announces Loan Guarantee Applications for Nuclear Power Plant Construction DOE Announces Loan Guarantee Applications for Nuclear Power Plant Construction October 2, 2008 - 3:43pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced it has received 19 Part I applications from 17 electric power companies for federal loan guarantees to support the construction of 14 nuclear power plants in response to its June 30, 2008 solicitation. The applications reflect the intentions of those companies to build 21 new reactors, with some applications covering two reactors at the same site. All five reactor designs that have been certified, or are currently under review for possible certification, by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) are

358

DOE Explosives Safety Manual  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Manual describes the Departments explosive safety requirements applicable to operations involving the development, testing, handling, and processing of explosives or assemblies containing explosives. Cancels DOE M 440.1-1. Canceled by DOE O 440.1B Chg 1.

2006-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

359

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

54 54 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 DOE/EA-1954 Draft Environmental Assessment for the Resumption of Transient Testing of Nuclear Fuels and Materials Draft November 2013 U.S. Department of Energy DOE Idaho Operations Office ii CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................. v

360

DOE CORPORATE REPORTING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7/23/2010 7/23/2010 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) CORPORATE REPORTING To ensure projects are effectively managed and delivering on the goals of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act), DOE will collect data on project management and execution, risk management, job creation, and key project milestones, in addition to what is required by Section 1512 of the Recovery Act. In most cases, monthly data will be used internally for managerial purposes only, but where DOE does intend to publicize monthly data, it will clearly indicate it to be "preliminary/informal and subject to change." Recipients are required to provide DOE information on, but not limited to, the following issues:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

DOE Patents Database - Widget  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Get the DOepatents Widget... Get the DOepatents Widget... Download the DOepatents widget to find DOE patent data, read news about DOE inventions, and browse the most-viewed patents. You may download and install this widget using the html inclusion code. Get the DOepatents widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! Not seeing a widget? (More info) Widget Features Search: Find patent information resulting from DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D) dating from the 1940s to today. Most Viewed: Browse the most frequently viewed patent records. News: Read about highlighted DOE inventions and inventors. Featured: View recently issued patents and patents owned exclusively by DOE. Contact: Send comments or questions about this collection. XML: Link directly to the DOepatents XML data service, with help and

362

DOE Grids Service Transition  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Grids Service Transition DOE Grids Service Transition Services Overview ECS Audio/Video Conferencing Fasterdata IPv6 Network Network Performance Tools (perfSONAR) ESnet OID Registry PGP Key Service Virtual Circuits (OSCARS) DOE Grids Service Transition Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside the US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside the US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site Feedback: info@es.net DOE Grids Service Transition Background ESnet has decided to transition support and management for the certificate services provided by the DOE Grids public key infrastructure (PKI) to the Open Sciences Grid (OSG). OSG and ESnet provide service to many of the same user communities, and have long been collaborators in the areas of identity

363

DOE Patents Database - About  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

About DOepatents About DOepatents DOepatents, developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), is a searchable database of patent information resulting from DOE-sponsored research and development (R&D). Included here are patents that DOE sponsored through a variety of funding mechanisms, including grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements. Comprehensive coverage of DOE patent information is one way to demonstrate the Department's contribution to scientific progress in the physical sciences and other disciplines. Publicly available patent information from DOE R&D, historic and current, is presented here, excluding patent applications. DOepatents consists of bibliographic records, with full text where available, either via a PDF file or an HTML link to the record at the

364

DOE Energy Innovation Hubs  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Research » DOE Energy Research » DOE Energy Innovation Hubs Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Materials Sciences & Engineering (MSE) Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences (CSGB) Accelerator and Detector Research Research Conduct Policies DOE Energy Innovation Hubs Energy Frontier Research Centers National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » Research DOE Energy Innovation Hubs Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds

365

DOE-2 basics  

SciTech Connect

DOE-2 provides the building design and research communities with an up-to-date, unbiased, well-documented public-domain computer program for building energy analysis. DOE-2 predicts the hourly energy use and energy cost of a building given hourly weather information and a description of the building and its HVAC equipment and utility rate structure. DOE-2 is a portable FORTRAN program that can be used on a large variety of computers, including PC's. Using DOE-2, designers can determine the choice of building parameters that improve energy efficiency while maintaining thermal comfort. The purpose of DOE-2 is to aid in the analysis of energy usage in buildings; it is not intended to be the sole source of information relied upon for the design of buildings. The judgment and experience of the architect/engineer still remain the most important elements of building design.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

DOE-2 basics  

SciTech Connect

DOE-2 provides the building design and research communities with an up-to-date, unbiased, well-documented public-domain computer program for building energy analysis. DOE-2 predicts the hourly energy use and energy cost of a building given hourly weather information and a description of the building and its HVAC equipment and utility rate structure. DOE-2 is a portable FORTRAN program that can be used on a large variety of computers, including PC`s. Using DOE-2, designers can determine the choice of building parameters that improve energy efficiency while maintaining thermal comfort. The purpose of DOE-2 is to aid in the analysis of energy usage in buildings; it is not intended to be the sole source of information relied upon for the design of buildings. The judgment and experience of the architect/engineer still remain the most important elements of building design.

Not Available

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

index | netl.doe.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Mercury Emissions Control Field Testing Phase I & II Field Testing Phase III Novel Concepts APCD Co-benefits Emissions Characterization Methods Development Regulatory Drivers...

368

index | netl.doe.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

with today's regulatory requirements. Low-NOx burners and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology have enabled hundreds of power plants to reach mandated emission levels....

369

index | netl.doe.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Control Water and Energy Interface Mercury Emission Control Solid Waste NOx Control Air Quality Research Particulate Control Control Technologies Regulatory In-House R&D This...

370

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE G 441.1-1C Radiation Protection Programs Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41.1-1C 41.1-1C RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAMS GUIDE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION LEARNING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Change No: 1 DOE G 441.1-1C Level: Familiar Date: 12/1/08 1 DOE G 441.1-1C, RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAMS GUIDE FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to 1. Match radiation protection-related terms to their definitions; 2. Discuss the elements that should be taken into consideration to determine the likelihood of an individual receiving a dose in excess of a regulatory monitoring threshold; 3. Give three examples of criteria that should trigger a formal as-low-as-is-

371

DOE F 1600.5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 (06-94) All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Control No. 1910-0400 U.S. Department of Energy Assurance of Compliance Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Office of Information Resources Management Policy, Plans, and Oversight, Records Management Division, HR-422 - GTN, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-0400), U.S.

372

DOE Policies | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Policies DOE Policies DOE Policies Cyber Security DOE O 205.1B Department of Energy Cyber Security Management (Approved May 16, 2011) Information Management Planning DOE Guide to IT Capital Planning and Investment, September 2010 (pdf) DOE IRM Strategic Plan, FY 2009 - 2011 (pdf) DOE N 203.1, Software Quality Assurance (pdf) DOE G 242.1-1, Forms Management Guide (pdf) DOE O 203.1 Limited Personal Use of Government Office Equipment Including Information Technology (pdf) Information Management Program Order, DOE O 200.1A (pdf) (Access to this document is restricted to DOE employees only) Records Management DOE Directive, O 243.1, Records Management Program (pdf) DOE Directive, O 243.2, Vital Records (pdf) DOE Directive, O 200.2, Information Collection Management Program

373

DOE plutonium disposition study: Pu consumption in ALWRs. Volume 2, Final report  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) has contracted with Asea Brown Boveri-Combustion Engineering (ABB-CE) to provide information on the capability of ABB-CE`s System 80 + Advanced Light Water Reactor (ALWR) to transform, through reactor burnup, 100 metric tonnes (MT) of weapons grade plutonium (Pu) into a form which is not readily useable in weapons. This information is being developed as part of DOE`s Plutonium Disposition Study, initiated by DOE in response to Congressional action. This document Volume 2, provides a discussion of: Plutonium Fuel Cycle; Technology Needs; Regulatory Considerations; Cost and Schedule Estimates; and Deployment Strategy.

Not Available

1993-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

374

DOE ORP Contracting Officer Representatives - Hanford Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE ORP Contracting Officer Representatives DOE - ORP ContractsProcurements ORP Contracts & Procurements Home DOE-ORP Contract Management Plans DOE-ORP Prime Contracts DOE-ORP...

375

DOE - ORP Contracts/Procurements - Hanford Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Procurements Home DOE-ORP Contract Management Plans DOE-ORP Prime Contracts DOE-ORP Contracting Officers DOE ORP Contracting Officer Representatives DOE ORP Purchase Card Buyers...

376

DOE G 200  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

G 200.1-1A G 200.1-1A Department of Energy (DOE) Systems Engineering Methodology Version 3 The DOE Systems Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for Information Technology Investments September 2002 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of the Chief Information Officer Date: September 2002 Page Rev Date: i TITLE PAGE Document Name: Department of Energy Systems Engineering Methodology (SEM) The DOE Systems Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for Information Technology Investments Publication Date: Original March 1996; Revised November 1997 Version 2 March 1999 Version 3 September 2002 Approval: ___________________________________ Karen Evans, Chief Information Officer ___________________________________ Brenda Coblentz, Program Manager, Software Quality & Systems Engineering

377

DOE Site List  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Links Links Central Internet Database CID Photo Banner DOE Site List Site Geo Site Code State Operations Office1 DOE Programs Generating Streams at Site DOE Programs Managing Facilities Associated Data2 Acid/Pueblo Canyons ACPC NM Oak Ridge Waste/Media, Facilities Airport Substation CA Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Hill Communication Site CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Substation CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities AL Complex NM Albuquerque DP Facilities Alba Craft ALCL OH Oak Ridge Facilities Albany Research Center AMRC OR Oak Ridge Facilities Alcova Switchyard WY Western Area Power Administration Facilities Aliquippa Forge ALFO PA Oak Ridge Facilities

378

DOE Distribution Workshop Attendees  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Laurie Actman Deputy Director EEB Hub Chris Ainscough Senior Engineer National renewable Energy Joe Allen Director of Government Relations Caterpillar / Solar Turbines Robert Anders Mr. U.S. Department of Energy - EERE David Anderson Technology Development Manager Department of Energy Sam Baldwin Chief Science Officer EERE/DOE Thomas Baldwin Conv Renewables Group Lead Idaho National Venkat Banunarayanan Grid Integration & Solar Forecasting Department of Energy - SunShot Vincent Battaglia Deputy Department Head ESDR LBNL Gil Bindewald General Engineer US DOE/Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Anjan Bose Grid Tech Team Lead DOE/Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Ralph Braccio

379

DOE Average Results  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE DOE Average Results FY 12 DOE Target FY 12 Customer Perspective: Customer Satisfaction: -Timeliness 92 88 -Quality 94 92 Effective Service Partnership: -Extent of Customer Satisfaction with the responsiveness, etc. 90 92 Internal Business Perspective: Acquisition Excellence: -Extent to which internal quality control systems are effective 90 88 Most Effective Use of Contracting Approaches to Maximize Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness: Use of Competition: -% of total $'s obligated on competitive acquisitions >$3000 (Agency Level Only) 94 85 -% of acquisition actions competed for actions > $3000 (Agency Level Only) 65 68 Performance Based Acquisition: - % PBA actions relative to total eligible new acquisition actions (applicable to new actions > $25K) 82

380

Radiological Protection for DOE Activities  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

Establishes radiological protection program requirements that, combined with 10 CFR 835 and its associated implementation guidance, form the basis for a comprehensive program for protection of individuals from the hazards of ionizing radiation in controlled areas. Extended by DOE N 441.3. Cancels DOE 5480.11, DOE 5480.15, DOE N 5400.13, DOE N 5480.11; please note: the DOE radiological control manual (DOE/EH-0256T)

1995-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

IEP - Advanced NOx Emissions Control: Regulatory Drivers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IEP - Advanced NOx Emissions Control Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants Regulatory and legislative requirements have predominantly driven the need to develop NOx control technologies for existing coal-fired power plants. The first driver was the Title IV acid rain program, established through the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). This program included a two-phase strategy to reduce NOx emissions from coal-fired power plants – Phase I started January 1, 1996 and Phase II started January 1, 2000. The Title IV NOx program was implemented through unit-specific NOx emission rate limits ranging from 0.40 to 0.86 lb/MMBtu depending on the type of boiler/burner configuration and based on application of LNB technology.

382

DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE Removes DOE Removes Brookhaven Contractor Peña sends a message to DOE facilities nationwide INSIDE 2 Accelerator Rx 4 FermiKids 6 Spring at Fermilab Photos courtesy of Brookhaven National Laboratory by Judy Jackson, Office of Public Affairs Secretary of Energy Federico Peña announced on Thursday, May 1, that the Department of Energy would immediately terminate the current management contract with Associated Universities, Inc. at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York. Peña said that he made the decision after receiving the results of a laboratory safety management review conducted by the independent oversight arm of DOE's Office of Environment, Safety and Health. In addition, the Secretary said he found unacceptable "the continued on page 8 Volume 20 Friday, May 16, 1997

383

DOE/EA-1807  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE WIND ENERGY PROJECT NORMAL, MCLEAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office DECEMBER 2010 DOE/EA 1807 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE WIND ENERGY PROJECT NORMAL, MCLEAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Golden Field Office DECEMBER 2010 DOE/EA 1807 iii December 2010 C OV E R S HE E T R E SPONSI B L E A G E NC Y : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) T I T L E : Final Environmental Assessment for Heartland Community College Wind Energy Project, Normal, McLean County, Illinois (DOE/EA 1807). C ONT A C T : For additional copies or more information on this Environmental Assessment

384

DOE 2014 Biomass Conference  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Breakout Session 1CFostering Technology Adoption I: Building the Market for Renewables with High Octane Fuels DOE 2014 Biomass Conference Jim Williams, Senior Manager, American Petroleum Institute

385

DOE/ID-Number  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

www.inl.gov Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S....

386

DOE Robotics Project  

SciTech Connect

This document provide the bimonthly progress reports on the Department of Energy (DOE) Robotics Project by the University of Michigan. Reports are provided for the time periods of December 90/January 91 through June 91/July 91. (FI)

Not Available

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

387

DOE Corporate FEOSH  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Employee Occupational Safety and Health (FEOSH) Program web site is the connection to current safety and health news and issues: Departmental special emphasis initiatives, upcoming activities, resources, contacts, and much, much more.

388

SunShot Initiative: Policy and Regulatory Environment  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Policy and Regulatory Environment Policy and Regulatory Environment to someone by E-mail Share SunShot Initiative: Policy and Regulatory Environment on Facebook Tweet about SunShot Initiative: Policy and Regulatory Environment on Twitter Bookmark SunShot Initiative: Policy and Regulatory Environment on Google Bookmark SunShot Initiative: Policy and Regulatory Environment on Delicious Rank SunShot Initiative: Policy and Regulatory Environment on Digg Find More places to share SunShot Initiative: Policy and Regulatory Environment on AddThis.com... Concentrating Solar Power Photovoltaics Systems Integration Balance of Systems Reducing Non-Hardware Costs Lowering Barriers Fostering Growth Policy and Regulatory Environment Photo of a man speaking while seated at a table with men and women surrounding him.

389

The U.S. regulatory framework for long-term management of uranium mill tailings  

SciTech Connect

The US established the regulatory structure for the management, disposal, and long-term care of uranium mill tailings in 1978 with the passage of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) (Pub. L. 95-604). This legislation has governed the cleanup and disposal of uranium tailings at both inactive and active sites. The passage of the UMTRCA established a federal regulatory program for the cleanup and disposal of uranium mill tailings in the US. This program involves the DOE, the NRC, the EPA, various states and tribal governments, private licensees, and the general public. The DOE has completed surface remediation at 14 sites, with the remaining sites either under construction or in planning. The DOE`s UMTRA Project has been very successful in dealing with public and agency demands, particularly regarding disposal site selection and transportation issues. The active sites are also being cleaned up, but at a slower pace than the inactive sites, with the first site tentatively scheduled for completion in 1996.

Smythe, C. [Dept. of Energy, Albuquerque, NM (United States); Bierley, D.; Bradshaw, M. [Roy F. Weston, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

RECENT PROGRESS IN DOE WASTE TANK CLOSURE  

SciTech Connect

The USDOE complex currently has over 330 underground storage tanks that have been used to process and store radioactive waste generated from the production of weapons materials. These tanks contain over 380 million liters of high-level and low-level radioactive waste. The waste consists of radioactively contaminated sludge, supernate, salt cake or calcine. Most of the waste exists at four USDOE locations, the Hanford Site, the Savannah River Site, the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center and the West Valley Demonstration Project. A summary of the DOE tank closure activities was first issued in 2001. Since then, regulatory changes have taken place that affect some of the sites and considerable progress has been made in closing tanks. This paper presents an overview of the current regulatory changes and drivers and a summary of the progress in tank closures at the various sites over the intervening six years. A number of areas are addressed including closure strategies, characterization of bulk waste and residual heel material, waste removal technologies for bulk waste, heel residuals and annuli, tank fill materials, closure system modeling and performance assessment programs, lessons learned, and external reviews.

Langton, C

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

Minutes from 12 December 2006 DOE/NRC Video Teleconference Call on Section 3116 Implementation Activities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12 December 2006 DOE/NRC Video Teleconference Call on Section 3116 12 December 2006 DOE/NRC Video Teleconference Call on Section 3116 Implementation Activities Attendees: Representatives from DOE-Savannah River (DOE-SR), DOE-Headquarters (DOE-HQ), and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) participated in a video teleconference call from 2:00 - 4:00 on 14 December 2006. A conference phone line was planned for other DOE field office participation (Idaho, West Valley, Office of River Protection), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV (EPA-IV), and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC). However, technical difficulties prevented participation from all except SCDHEC. Discussion: The participants discussed prioritization of generic and specific technical issues to be resolved and a potential schedule for future meetings to discuss resolution

392

Microsoft PowerPoint - Overview Briefing - Tab 1 DOE's Procurement System July 2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

' ' s P r o c u r e m e n t S y s t e m D O E ' s P r o c u r e m e n t S y s t e m 1 - 2 DOE's Procurement System The System Infrastructure What Organizations Govern/Influence the System? What is the Statutory/Regulatory Framework of the System? What Roles Do DOE Officials Play In the Process? What Does DOE's Procurement System Encompass? 1 - 3 What Does DOE's Procurement System Encompass? The integration of the procurement process (acquisition of property and services), the professional development of procurement personnel, and the management structure for carrying out the procurement function. For purposes of this presentation, DOE's Procurement System includes policies, procedures and management systems pertaining to the provision of financial assistance (grants and cooperative agreements).

393

DOE 2012 Occupational Radiation Exposure October 2013  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Analysis within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) publishes the annual DOE Occupational Radiation Exposure Report to provide an overview of the status of radiation protection practices at DOE (including the National Nuclear Security Administration [NNSA]). The DOE 2012 Occupational Radiation Exposure Report provides an evaluation of DOE-wide performance regarding compliance with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.), Part 835, Occupational Radiation Protection dose limits and as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) process requirements. In addition, the report provides data to DOE organizations responsible for developing policies for protection of individuals from the adverse health effects of radiation. The report provides a summary and an analysis of occupational radiation exposure information from the monitoring of individuals involved in DOE activities. Over the past 5-year period, the occupational radiation exposure information is analyzed in terms of aggregate data, dose to individuals, and dose by site. As an indicator of the overall amount of radiation dose received during the conduct of operations at DOE, the report includes information on collective total effective dose (TED). The TED is comprised of the effective dose (ED) from external sources, which includes neutron and photon radiation, and the internal committed effective dose (CED), which results from the intake of radioactive material into the body. The collective ED from photon exposure decreased by 23% between 2011 and 2012, while the neutron dose increased by 5%. The internal dose components of the collective TED decreased by 7%. Over the past 5-year period, 99.99% of the individuals receiving measurable TED have received doses below the 2 roentgen equivalent in man (rems) (20 millisievert [mSv]) TED administrative control level (ACL), which is well below the DOE regulatory limit of 5 rems (50 mSv) TED annually. The occupational radiation exposure records show that in 2012, DOE facilities continued to comply with DOE dose limits and ACLs and worked to minimize exposure to individuals. The DOE collective TED decreased 17.1% from 2011 to 2012. The collective TED decreased at three of the five sites with the largest collective TED. u Idaho Site Collective dose reductions were achieved as a result of continuing improvements at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) through the planning of drum movements that reduced the number of times a container is handled; placement of waste containers that created highradiation areas in a centralized location; and increased worker awareness of high-dose rate areas. In addition, Idaho had the largest decrease in the total number of workers with measurable TED (1,143 fewer workers). u Hanford Site (Hanford) An overall reduction of decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) activities at the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) and Transuranic (TRU) retrieval activities resulted in collective dose reductions. u Savannah River Site (SRS) Reductions were achieved through ALARA initiatives employed site wide. The Solid Waste Management Facility used extended specialty tools, cameras and lead shield walls to facilitate removal of drums. These tools and techniques reduce exposure time through improved efficiency, increase distance from the source of radiation by remote monitoring, shield the workers to lower the dose rate, and reduce the potential for contamination and release of material through repacking of waste. Overall, from 2011 to 2012, there was a 19% decrease in the number of workers with measurable dose. Furthermore, due to a slight decrease in both the DOE workforce (7%) and monitored workers (10%), the ratio of workers with measurable doses to monitored workers decreased to 13%. Another primary indicator of the level of radiation exposure covered in this report is the average measurable dose, which normalizes the collective dose over the population of workers who actually received a measurable dose. The average measurable TED in

none,

2012-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

394

Areva_EREF_DOE-EIS-0471.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Areva Eagle Rock Enrichment Facility Bonneville County, Idaho Final Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG-1945, Adopted as DOE/EIS-0471 U.S. Department of Energy May 2011 Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Eagle Rock Enrichment Facility in Bonneville County, Idaho Final Report Chapters 1 through 10 Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs NUREG-1945, Vol. 1 AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at NRC=s Public Electronic Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html.

395

DOE - Safety of Radioactive Material Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

What are the requirements? Safety Record The Agencies that Generate Rules that Promulgate the Transport of Radioactive Materials: Regulations to control the transport of radioactive material were initiated about 1935 by the Postal Service. Over the years, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) became involved and in 1948 promulgated regulations as Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. In 1966, DOT received hazardous materials regulatory authority that had been exercised by the ICC, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and United States Costal Guard (USCG). Currently, five groups generate rules governing the transport of radioactive material -- the DOT, NRC, USPS, DOE, and various State agencies. Among these, DOT and NRC are the primary agencies issuing regulations based on the model regulations developed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

396

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ashtabula  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ohio Ohio Ashtabula, Ohio, Site Other Regulatory Framework ashtabula2013 The Ashtabula, Ohio, Site is a 42.5-acre, privately owned site adjacent to the city of Ashtabula, about 55 miles east of Cleveland. From 1962 to 1988 Reactive Metals, Inc. (RMI) operated a facility on the property that manufactured metallic uranium tubes and rods and experimental quantities of thorium metal for use in the Hanford, Washington; and Savannah River, Georgia, weapons program reactors. RMI also extruded depleted uranium and nonradioactive materials, primarily copper-based, for the private sector. The site has been decontaminated and released for unrestricted use. Responsibility for maintaining records for the Ashtabula site was transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2010. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For more information about the Ashtabula site, view the fact sheet.

397

DOE - Safety of Radioactive Material Transportation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SAFE are radioactive material transportations packages? SAFE are radioactive material transportations packages? RAM PACKAGES TESTING & CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS & GUIDANCE SITE MAP This graphic was generated from a computer analysis and shows the results from a regulatory puncture test of a stainless steel packaging dropping 40 inches (10 MPH) onto a 6 inch diameter steel spike. U.S. DOE | Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Sandia National Laboratories | Nuclear Energy & Fuel Cucle Programs © Sandia Corporation | Site Contact | Sandia Site Map | Privacy and Security An internationally recognized web-site from PATRAM 2001 - the 13th International Symposium on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material. Recipient of the AOKI AWARD. PATRAM, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency brings government and industry leaders together to share information on innovations, developments, and lessons learned about radioactive materials packaging and transportation.

398

US Department of Energys Regulatory Negotiations Convening on Commercial Certification for Heating, Ventilating, Air-Conditioning, and Refrigeration Equipment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

US Department of Energy's Regulatory Negotiations Convening on US Department of Energy's Regulatory Negotiations Convening on Commercial Certification for Heating, Ventilating, Air-Conditioning, and Refrigeration Equipment Public Information for Convening Interviews I. What are the substantive issues DOE seeks to address? Strategies for grouping various basic models for purposes of certification; Identification of non-efficiency attributes, which do not impact the measured consumption of the equipment as tested by DOE's test procedure; The information that is certified to the Department; The timing of when the certification should be made relative to distribution in commerce; and Alterations to a basic model that would impact the certification.

399

DOE/Grand Junction Office Bluewater LTSP July 1997 Doc. No. S00012AA, Page iii  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE/Grand Junction Office Bluewater LTSP DOE/Grand Junction Office Bluewater LTSP July 1997 Doc. No. S00012AA, Page iii Contents Page 1.0 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Legal and Regulatory Requirements .................................................................................. 1 1.3 Role of the Department of Energy ..................................................................................... 2 1.4 Disposal of Mill Waste Containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls ........................................ 2 2.0 Bluewater Disposal Site .....................................................................................................................

400

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

An investigation of regulatory and voluntary environmental capital expenditures  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper investigates the firm-specific economic consequences of regulatory and voluntary environmental capital expenditures. Using firm-level environmental data, I decompose total environmental capital expenditures into estimates of regulatory and voluntary components. I then examine the relations of regulatory and voluntary environmental capital outlays with future abnormal earnings, stock prices, and stock returns. As predicted, the empirical analysis reveals that regulatory environmental capital expenditures are negatively associated with future abnormal earnings. Moreover, market-based tests indicate that the regulatory component of environmental capital expenditures is negatively priced. Finally, the results suggest that voluntary environmental capital expenditures and regulatory environmental capital expenditures have different firm-specific economic consequences.

Derek Johnston

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA DOE Policy on Decommissioning DOE Facilities Under CERCLA In May 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a policy in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for decommissioning surplus DOE facilities consistent with the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This policy ensures protection of the environment, worker health and public health, provides opportunities for stakeholder involvement, and achieves risk reduction without unnecessary delay. Consistent with the jointly issued "Guidance on Accelerating CERCLA Environmental Restoration at Federal Facilities" (August 22, 1994), this decommissioning policy encourages streamlined decision-making. This

403

Political Activity at DOE Facilities and by DOE Contractors ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and by DOE Contractors The Policy Flash from October 5, 2011, serves to remind Contracting Officers of restrictions on political activity by DOE contractors at the Department...

404

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE G 414.1-2B Admin Change 1, Quality Assurance Program Guide DOE O 221.1A, Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse to the Office of the Inspector General DOE O 232.2, Occurrence...

405

DOE Ex Parte Communication Memorandum  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

On Thursday March 20th, energy efficiency experts held a teleconference call withtrepresentatives of the US Department of Energy (DOE) to discuss DOEs proposed determination for computer systems.

406

DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order institutes a DOE wide program for the management of operating experience to prevent adverse operating incidents and facilitate the sharing of good work practices among DOE sites. Cancels DOE O 210.2.

2011-04-08T23:59:59.000Z

407

A Comparison of International Regulatory Organizations and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A Comparison of International Regulatory Organizations and Licensing Procedures for New Nuclear the safety regulation and the licensing of new nuclear power plants. The paper considers both design safety approval and issues of site licensing. Advice from international organisations is summarised. Nuclear power

Aickelin, Uwe

408

Trawler: de novo regulatory motif discovery pipeline  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Trawler: de novo regulatory motif discovery pipeline for chromatin immunoprecipitation Laurence, the fastest computational pipeline to date, to efficiently discover over-represented motifs in chromatin present the Trawler pipeline (Fig. 1a) that attempts the de novo identification of all over

Cai, Long

409

DOE Awards Grant to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment Cabinet  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Cincinnati The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (EMCBC) is awarding a $3.4 Million Grant to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment Cabinet (EEC) for regulatory oversight of the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) located in Paducah, KY.

410

DOE Awards Grant to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment Cabinet  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Cincinnati The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (EMCBC) is awarding a $3.6 Million Grant to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment Cabinet (EEC) for regulatory oversight of the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) located in Paducah, KY.

411

DOE Awards Grants to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment Cabinet  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Cincinnati The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (EMCBC) is awarding two separate grants together totaling about $7 million to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Energy and Environment Cabinet (EEC) for regulatory oversight of the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) located in Paducah, KY.

412

REMA_DOE_exparte_1.6.2011.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 600 * Washington, DC 20036-2701 1 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 600 * Washington, DC 20036-2701 202-640-6597 tel * 202-223-5537 fax * www.renewablemarketers.org January 12, 2011 By email: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulatory Law Office of the General Counsel Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0121 RE: Ex Parte Memorandum Dear Mr. Cohen: On Thursday, January 6, 2011, representatives from the Renewable Energy Markets Association (REMA) held a conference call with personnel from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to discuss REMA's formal comment submission on Docket ID: EERE- 2010-BT-STD-0031. Ms. Margo Appel of the DOE's Office of the Building Technologies Program called the meeting to order at 11:02am.

413

DOE Projects to Advance Environmental Science and Technology | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Projects to Advance Environmental Science and Technology DOE Projects to Advance Environmental Science and Technology DOE Projects to Advance Environmental Science and Technology August 19, 2009 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The Office of Fossil Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) has selected nine new projects targeting environmental tools and technology for shale gas and coalbed methane (CBM) production. NETL's goals for these projects are to improve management of water resources, water usage, and water disposal, and to support science that will aid the regulatory and permitting processes required for shale gas development. A primary goal of Fossil Energy's Oil and Natural Gas Program is to enhance the responsible development of domestic natural gas and oil resources that supply the country's energy. A specific objective is to accelerate the

414

DOE Environmental Management Strategy and Experience for In-Situ  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Management Strategy and Experience for In-Situ Environmental Management Strategy and Experience for In-Situ Decommissioning DOE Environmental Management Strategy and Experience for In-Situ Decommissioning In situ decommissioning (ISD) is the permanent entombment of a contaminated facility. At present, ISD is not recognized or addressed in the Department of Energy (DOE) and Office of Environmental Management (EM) lexicon; however, ISD is not a revolutionary concept. Since the 1970s, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recognized the option of entombing a facility as a decommissioning option. Permanent entombment of a radioactively contaminated facility as a decommissioning option has been completed for one facility at the Idaho National Laboratory and is currently planned at a limited number of selected DOE facilities. The

415

DOE-NETLs Mercury R&D Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

POWER-GEN POWER-GEN International 2004 -- Hg Control - Coping with Regulatory Uncertainty Orlando, FL December 1, 2004 Thomas J. Feeley, III thomas.feeley@netl.doe.gov National Energy Technology Laboratory Power-Gen, Dec. 1, 2004 History of DOE/NETL Mercury RD&D 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 * Field testing * Plume chemistry Final Hg Regulations * Emission character- ization/ * Lab/bench- scale R&D * Monitors * Pilot-scale R&D * Byproduct characterization * Commercial demonstrations 1990 CAA Amendments Development of Regulations Development of Regulations ACS Monthly Meeting November 4 2004 DOE Mercury Control RD&D Portfolio Polishing Technology * MerCAP(tm) Sorbent Injection * Activated carbon * Amended silicates * Halogenated AC * Ca-based sorbents * Chemically treated sorbents

416

DOE Seeks Independent Evaluation of Remote-Handled Waste Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Seeks Independent Evaluation Seeks Independent Evaluation Of Remote-Handled Waste Program CARLSBAD, N.M., July 24, 2001 - An independent panel of scientific and engineering experts will convene July 30 in Carlsbad to evaluate U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) plans for managing remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). DOE's Carlsbad Field Office has asked the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the Institute for Regulatory Science to review its proposed RH-TRU waste program. The program must be approved by the New Mexico Environment Department and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before DOE will be permitted to accept and dispose of RH-TRU waste at WIPP. "Safety and compliance are our primary considerations in developing the plans for

417

DOE Marks Milestone in Submitting Yucca Mountain License Application |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Marks Milestone in Submitting Yucca Mountain License Marks Milestone in Submitting Yucca Mountain License Application DOE Marks Milestone in Submitting Yucca Mountain License Application June 3, 2008 - 12:51pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced submittal of a license application (LA) to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) seeking authorization to construct America's first repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The 8,600 page application describes DOE's plan to safely isolate spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in tunnels deep underground at Yucca Mountain, a remote ridge on federally controlled land in the Mojave Desert 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas. Currently, the waste is stored at 121 temporary locations in 39 states

418

Gaseous diffusion plant transition from DOE to external regulation  

SciTech Connect

After many years of operation as government-owned/contractor-operated facilities, large portions of the gaseous diffusion plants (GDPs) at Portsmouth, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky, were leased to the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC). These facilities are now certified by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and subject to oversight by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The transition from DOE to NRC regulation was more difficult than expected. The original commitment was to achieve NRC certification in October 1995; however, considerably more time was required and transition-related costs escalated. The Oak Ridge Operations Office originally estimated the cost of transition at $60 million; $240 million has been spent to date. The DOE`s experience in transitioning the GDPs to USEC operation with NRC oversight provides valuable lessons (both positive and negative) that could be applied to future transitions.

Dann, R.K.; Crites, T.R.; Rahm-Crites, L.K. [Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States)

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

419

DOE Announces Loan Guarantee Applications for Nuclear Power Plant  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Loan Guarantee Applications for Nuclear Power Plant Loan Guarantee Applications for Nuclear Power Plant Construction DOE Announces Loan Guarantee Applications for Nuclear Power Plant Construction October 2, 2008 - 3:43pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced it has received 19 Part I applications from 17 electric power companies for federal loan guarantees to support the construction of 14 nuclear power plants in response to its June 30, 2008 solicitation. The applications reflect the intentions of those companies to build 21 new reactors, with some applications covering two reactors at the same site. All five reactor designs that have been certified, or are currently under review for possible certification, by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) are represented in the Part I applications. DOE also has received Part I

420

links | netl.doe.gov  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Engines U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY INFORMATION SOURCES Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Coal Technology Compendium DOE Labs Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Network (EREN)...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Contribution of Modeling and Simulation Studies in the Regulatory Review: A European Regulatory Perspective  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

For new active substances, the Pediatric Investigation Plan should be submitted for regulatory review during early drug development, i.e...., at the initiation of Phase 2, but may be updated when more knowledge i...

Siv Jnsson; Anja Henningsson; Monica Edholm; Tomas Salmonson

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

DOE Exascale Initiative  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Exascale Initiative Dimitri Kusnezov, Senior Advisor to the Secretary, US DOE Steve Binkley, Senior Advisor, Office of Science, US DOE Bill Harrod, Office of Science/ASCR Bob Meisner, Defense Programs/ASC Briefing to the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, September 13, 2013 The Department of Energy is planning for a major computer and computational science initiative anchored in our mission challenges. We use the term 'exascale' to capture the successful transition to the next era of computing in the 2020 timeframe. Change is coming in many ways, not just technology. For instance: World we were in World we are going to Processing/ Processing expensive/ Processing free/ Memory: memory free memory expensive Ecosystem US micro-electronics Globalization of supply chain

423

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2. Narratives and Records Series Descriptions 2. Narratives and Records Series Descriptions Introduction This chapter contains two kinds of information. The first consists of brief narrative histories that discuss the involvement of the Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies with human radiation experiments. These histories cover agency headquarters elements and the various field sites that had significant involvement in experiment activities. The second category of information is series descriptions for groups of original records that are pertinent to either individual experiments or to the organizational context in which they took place. Since many of these records still reside at DOE sites, series descriptions are appended to the narrative for each facility. Where records are not in the custody of DOE, they are listed under their custodial organization (such as the National Archives).

424

DOE/EIS-0380  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 FISCAL YEAR 2011 MITIGATION ACTION PLAN ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE 2008 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE-WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APRIL 2012 LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE 3747 West Jemez Road, MS A-316 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 DISCLAIMER: This document was prepared by Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS) in their role as management and operations (M&O) contractor for the Los Alamos National Laboratory, under contract to DOE/NNSA (Contract Number DE-AC52-06NA25396). DOE/NNSA LASO has reviewed this document for content and accuracy. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Officer for DOE/NNSA LASO concurs with this document. LA-UR-11-06159 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

425

DOE Hydrogen Program Overview  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Fuel Cells and Fuel Cells Mark Paster U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Program January, 2005 A Bold New Approach is Required 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Petroleum (MMB/Day Oil Equivalent) Actual Projection U.S. Oil Production EIA 2003 Base Case Extended Oil Consumption With Average Fuel Efficiency Automobile & Light Truck Oil Use U.S. Transportation Oil Consumption U.S. Refinery Capacity Source: DOE/EIA, International Petroleum Statistics Reports, April 1999; DOE/EIA 0520, International Energy Annual 1997, DOE/EIA0219(97), February 1999. 0 20 40 60 80 100 Rest of World OPEC US Percentage of Total Consumption Production Reserves 2% 12% 26% 7% 41% 77% 67% 47% 21% World Oil Reserves are Consolidating in OPEC Nations 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

426

DOE Retro Analysis Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Retro Analysis Plan Retro Analysis Plan August 2, 2011 Page 1 August 2, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the July 11, 2011 Federal Register requesting comments on the Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules. We are encouraged by DOE's efforts to implement Executive Order 13563. We appreciate the actions already taken by DOE to address our concerns regarding the Final Rule on Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Regulations for Consumer Products and Commercial and

427

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

428

DOE F 284  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-284 DOE-284 (10-88) MANDATORY DATA COLLECTION AUTHORIZED BY Public Laws 83-703, 93-438 Previous editions are obsolete. OMB CONTROL NO. 1910-1800 Public Reporting Notice Disclosure on Back NUCLEAR MATERIAL TRANSFER REPORT NUCLEAR MATERIAL ON TRANSFER SHIPPING DATE MATERIAL HAS BEEN VERIFIED AS FOLLOWS (CHECH ONE): DATE RECEIVED FROM (RIS) PIECE COUNT OTHER: SHIPPER'S WEIGHTS AND NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONTENTS ARE ACCEPTED PENDING FINAL VERIFICATION MEASUREMENTS AND COMPLETION OF DOE/NRC FORM 741 CONTAINER COUNT BY (ACCOUNTABILITY REPRESENTATIVE) (See instructions for provisions regarding confidentiality.) GROSS WEIGHT CHECK TO (RIS) NO. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 18. U.S.C., SECTION 1001, ACT OF JUNE 25, 1948; 62 STAT. 749, MAKES IT A CRIMINAL OFFENSE TO MAKE A WILLFULLY FALSE STATEMENT OR REPRESENTATION TO ANY DEPARTMENT

429

DOE | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE DOE Dataset Summary Description Source EERE Date Released September 27th, 2010 (4 years ago) Date Updated September 27th, 2010 (4 years ago) Keywords buildings commercial buildings DOE energy use Data application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon New construction (xlsx, 277.8 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon Post-1980 construction (in or after 1980) (xlsx, 277.9 KiB) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet icon Pre-1980 construction (xlsx, 253 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) Comment Rate this dataset Usefulness of the metadata

430

GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- - a,- p^A CU ^ ^JL\ CC6p^ w b A GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS Office of Management, November 2008 The DOE Headquarters Forrestal and Germantown buildings have award-winning energy conservation and environmental quality programs focused on making our buildings as green as possible and, enabling them to serve as showcases for the entire Department. Both the Forrestal and the Germantown facilities have earned EPA's Energy Star designation, ranking them among the nation's top buildings in terms of energy performance. Of all the buildings in the U.S. only approximately 4000 have earned this distinction. In addition, the Forrestal Building is one of only two Federal Energy Star Buildings in Washington DC. DOE Headquarters achieved these designations after years of effort by the facility managers and staffs to incorporate energy

431

Motivations in romantic relationships: a regulatory focus perspective  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The present research tested whether and how regulatory focus as a motivational variable influences the ways in which people appraise, process, and react to events in romantic relationships. Regulatory focus theory distinguishes between (1) a...

Winterheld, Heike A.

2005-08-29T23:59:59.000Z

432

DOE Directives | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Directives DOE Directives DOE Directives Directives are the Department of Energy's primary means to communicate and institutionalize directives and policies and to establish requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. DOE O 413.3A - Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets DOE G 413.3-1 - Managing Design and Construction Using Systems Engineering for Use with DOE O 413.3A DOE G 413.3-2 - Quality Assurance Guide for Project Management DOE G 413.3-3 - Safeguards and Security for Program and Project Management DOE G 413.3-8 - Environmental Management (EM) Cleanup Projects DOE G 413.3-9 - U.S. Department of Energy Project Review Guide for Capital Asset Projects DOE G 413.3-10 - Earned Value Management System (EVMS)

433

DOE Home Offices & Facilities About DOE Press Room q Highlights  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SEARCH DOE Home Offices & Facilities About DOE Press Room q Highlights q Press Releases q DOE strategies and biotechnologies for cleaning up groundwater at DOE and at industry sites." The contamination've provided a comprehensive picture that has led to fundamental changes in how scientists evaluate

Lovley, Derek

434

Does Private Money Buy Public Policy? Campaign Contributions and Regulatory Outcomes in Telecommunications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 FCC 96-Commission (2000), Telecommunications Provider LocatorCommission (2003a), Telecommunications Provider Locator

de Figueiredo, Rui J.P. Jr.; Edwards, Geoff

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

US Department of Energys Regulatory Negotiations Convening...  

Energy Savers (EERE)

Regulatory Negotiations Convening on Commercial Certification for Heating, Ventilating, Air-Conditioning, and Refrigeration Equipment regnegonacconfidentiality.pdf More...

436

Methylmercury in fish: a review of residue levels, fish consumption and regulatory action in the United States  

SciTech Connect

The dangers associated with the consumption of large amounts of methylmercury in fish are well recognized, and there is some evidence to suggest that methylmercury may be the cause of subtle neurological impairments when ingested at even low to moderate levels, particularly the prenatal and early childhood periods. This concern has prompted a continuing assessment of the risk of methylmercury toxicity among fish consumers in the US as well as other countries. The toxicokinetics of methylmercury in humans are reviewed and used to estimate body burdens associated with toxic effects. To determine seafood consumption patterns among the continental US population the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has analyzed data from a diary study commissioned by the Tuna Research Foundation. Mercury residue levels in domestic fish sampled by the FDA were used to determine the level of exposure to methylmercury. Until evidence is presented that substantially lowers the known body burden of methylmercury which causes toxicity, calculations indicate that the current 1.0 ppm regulatory level provides adequate protection for the average fish consumer, for young children, and for a significant number of consumers exceeding the acceptable daily intake. However, additional studies are being carried out in a continuing process to ensure that safe levels of prenatal exposure to mercury residues in fish are maintained.

Tollefson, L.; Cordle, F.

1986-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Annual report shows potential INL radiation dose well below safe regulatory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual report shows potential INL radiation dose well below safe Annual report shows potential INL radiation dose well below safe regulatory limits Annual report shows potential INL radiation dose well below safe regulatory limits August 9, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Tim Jackson, DOE-Idaho Operations Office 208-526-8484 The U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho Operations Office reported this month that radiation from the site falls well below limits established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The annual report's conclusions are supported by direct environmental monitoring data routinely taken during the year, and show that activities at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) site are protective of human health and the environment. Data shows that the INL site potential radiation dose is less than 1% of

438

Enclosure 3 TECHNICAL AND REGULATORY SUPPORT DOCUMENT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

....................................................................................................30 d. Equivalent QA Program........................................................................................................................25 6. Implementation of Characterization Methodologies to Satisfy DQOs................................................................................................31 III. EPA'S ANALYSIS OF DOE'S PROPOSED RH PROGRAM

439

Policy and Regulatory Environment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

levels, a complex set of interdependent policies define the extent to which renewable energy markets are able to develop and thrive. DOE has identified the following key...

440

Flynet: a genomic resource for Drosophila melanogaster transcriptional regulatory networks  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Next, users can review the associated...and chromatin regulatory proteins include...Drosophila cis-regulatory element database...Histone H3. We plan to reanalyze...We will also plan to update Flynet...a systematic review of site-specific...transcriptional regulatory networks. Curr......

Feng Tian; Parantu K. Shah; Xiangjun Liu; Nicolas Negre; Jia Chen; Oleksiy Karpenko; Kevin P. White; Robert L. Grossman

2009-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Grouped graphical Granger modeling for gene expression regulatory networks discovery  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Hinkley (2006) for a review]. More precisely...method to uncover gene regulatory networks for the human...As future work we plan to consider a variant...time-delayed gene regulatory networks based on temporal...et al. Modelling regulatory pathways in E.coli......

Aurlie C. Lozano; Naoki Abe; Yan Liu; Saharon Rosset

2009-06-15T23:59:59.000Z

442

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW /  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / INITIAL REGULATORY RIR Regulatory Impact Review RP Central GOA Rockfish Program RP CV Rockfish Program Catcher Vessel RPA FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For a proposed Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf

443

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY an Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area including a Regulatory Amendment to rescind regulations (� 675.22, paragraphs c,d,e) that allow

444

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 18 CFR Chapter I (Docket No. RM05 Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Inquiry (NOI). SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory, the Commission is inviting comments on section 1233 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which defines native load

Laughlin, Robert B.

445

Environmental Regulatory Update Table, January/February 1995  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives impacting environmental, health, and safety management responsibilities. the table is updated bi-monthly with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Bock, R.E.; Mayer, S.J.; Salk, M.S.

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

Regulatory requirements and tools for environmental assessment of hazardous wastes: Understanding tribal and stakeholder concerns using Department of Energy sites  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Many US governmental and Tribal Nation agencies, as well as state and local entities, deal with hazardous wastes within regulatory frameworks that require specific environmental assessments. In this paper we use Department of Energy (DOE) sites as examples to examine the relationship between regulatory requirements and environmental assessments for hazardous waste sites and give special attention to how assessment tools differ. We consider federal laws associated with environmental protection include the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), as well as regulations promulgated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Tribal Nations and state agencies. These regulatory regimes require different types of environmental assessments and remedial investigations, dose assessments and contaminant pathways. The DOE case studies illustrate the following points: 1) there is often understandable confusion about what regulatory requirements apply to the site resources, and what environmental assessments are required by each, 2) the messages sent on site safety issued by different regulatory agencies are sometimes contradictory or confusing (e.g.Oak Ridge Reservation), 3) the regulatory frameworks being used to examine the same question can be different, leading to different conclusions (e.g. Brookhaven National Laboratory), 4) computer models used in support of groundwater models or risk assessments are not necessarily successful in convincing Native Americans and others that there is no possibility of risk from contaminants (e.g. Amchitka Island), 5) when given the opportunity to choose between relying on a screening risk assessments or waiting for a full site-specific analysis of contaminants in biota, the screening risk assessment option is rarely selected (e.g. Amchitka, Hanford Site), and finally, 6) there needs to be agreement on whether there has been adequate characterization to support the risk assessment (e.g. Hanford). The assessments need to be transparent and to accommodate different opinions about the relationship between characterizations and risk assessments. This paper illustrates how many of the problems at DOE sites, and potentially at other sites in the U.S. and elsewhere, derive from a lack of either understanding of, or consensus about, the regulatory process, including the timing and types of required characterizations and data in support of site characterizations and risk assessments.

Joanna Burger; Charles Powers; Michael Gochfeld

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Role of fast reactor and its cycle to reduce nuclear waste burden  

SciTech Connect

The role of the metal fuel fast reactor with recycling of actinides and the five long-lived fission products based on the concept of the Self-Consistent Nuclear Energy System has been examined by evaluating the reduction of nuclear wastes during the transition period to this reactor system. The evaluation was done in comparison to an LWR once-through case and a conventional actinide recycling oxide fast reactor. As a result, it is quantitatively clarified that a metal fuel fast reactor with actinide and the five long-lived fission products (I{sup 129}, Tc{sup 99}, Zr{sup 93}, Cs{sup 135} and Sn{sup 126}) recycling could play a significant role in reducing the nuclear waste burden including the current LWR wastes. This can be achieved by using a fast neutron spectrum reactor enhanced with metal fuel that brings high capability as a 'waste burner'. (authors)

Arie, Kazuo; Oomori, Takashi; Okita, Takeshi [Toshiba Corporation, 8, Shinsugita-cho, Isogo-ku, Yokohama 235-8523 (Japan); Kawashima, Masatoshi [Toshiba Nuclear Engineering Services Corporation, 8, Shinsugita-cho, Isogo-ku, Yokohama, 235-8523 (Japan); Kotake, Shoji [The Japan Atomic Power Company, 1-1, Kanda-Mitoshiro-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0053 (Japan); Fuji-ie, Yoichi [Nuclear Salon Fuji-ie, 1-11-10, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0034 (Japan)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

A Process for Reducing the Licensing Burden for New Products Containing Depleted Uranium  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3-01 3-01 A Process for Reducing the Licensing Burden for New Products Containing Depleted Uranium Environmental Assessment Division Argonne National Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago, under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38, for the United States Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory, is operated by The University of Chicago under contract W-31-109-Eng-38. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The University of Chicago, nor any of their employees or officers, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes

449

DOE/ID-Number  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

822 822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 DOE/EA-1822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... iii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ vii

450

DOE/ID-Number  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

76 76 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 DOE/EA-1776 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... v 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................................. 2

451

DOE/CF-0073  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 DOE/CF-0073 Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas

452

DOE Cybersecurity Awareness Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The OCIO supports a variety of cybersecurity awareness activities that impress upon DOE employees the importance of cybersecurity and the adverse consequences of its failure. The primary purpose of awareness activities is to enhance the 'general awareness and understanding' of current cyber threats and recommended mitigations as well as to cultivate a computing environment where cybersecurity behaviors and responses are automatic and consistent.

453

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 DOE/EA-1776 Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range Environmental Assessment Final October 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ iii

454

DOE/ID-Number  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22 22 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 DOE/EA-1822 Idaho National Laboratory Stand-Off Experiment (SOX) Range Environmental Assessment Final March 2011 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office i CONTENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... iii

455

Sources of local variation in polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon and pesticide body burden in oysters (Crassostrea virginica) from Galveston Bay, Texas  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

1. Eggs and sperm contain significantly more PAH (polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon) than somatic tissues in oysters (Crassostrea virginica) taken from Galveston Bay. 2. The quantity of gonadal material was the most important correlate of PAH body burden. 3. Eggs, but not sperm, were enriched in chlorinated compounds (e.g. DDD, chlordane), while both eggs and sperm were enriched in total \\{PCBs\\} relative to somatic tissue. 4. Oysters may lose up to 50% of their total body burden of certain \\{PAHs\\} and pesticides in a single spawn.

Matthew S. Ellis; Kwang-Sik Choi; Terry L. Wade; Eric N. Powell; Thomas J. Jackson; Donald H. Lewis

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order establishes a DOE wide program for management of operating experience to prevent adverse operating incidents and to expand the sharing of good work practices among DOE sites. Canceled by DOE O 210.2A. Does not cancel other directives.

2006-06-12T23:59:59.000Z

457

Senior DOE Officials in Spain to Participate in World Petroleum Congress,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Senior DOE Officials in Spain to Participate in World Petroleum Senior DOE Officials in Spain to Participate in World Petroleum Congress, July 1, 2008 Senior DOE Officials in Spain to Participate in World Petroleum Congress, July 1, 2008 Senior DOE Officials in Spain to Participate in World Petroleum Congress. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Kevin Kolevar and Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy James A. Slutz are in Madrid, Spain this week to participate in the 19th World Petroleum Congress-a global forum held every three years by the World Petroleum Council to address resource potential, infrastructure, the regulatory framework and other key issues related to the future of petroleum development. Senior DOE Officials in Spain to Participate in World Petroleum Congress,

458

DOE | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

DOE DOE Home DOE Wind Vision Community Description: The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% The DOE Wind Program, in close cooperation with the wind industry, is launching a new initiative to revisit the findings of the 2008 DOE 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report, and to develop a renewed vision for U.S. wind power research, development, and deployment. Included in this effort will be: community DOE forum Wind Graham7781's picture Submitted by Graham7781(1992) Super contributor 26 April, 2013 - 11:05 OpenEI Showcased in Geothermal Exploration Best Practices Workshop DOE geothermal GTO OpenEI This week, Denver hosted the US DOE Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) 2013 Peer Review. The purpose of the peer review is to offer geothermal

459

DOE Science Showcase - Understanding Protein Membranes | OSTI...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Information Bridge Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments Database DOE R&D Project Summaries DOE Data Explorer Drug Research Documents from DOE Databases...

460

GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS GREENING DOE HEADQUARTERS More Documents & Publications Other Major Litigation of Direct Interest to...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan 2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan In the 2014 DOE Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan, DOE pledges to...

462

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 JAN 2 2 1982 -/ Departmznt'of Ene,rgy ATTN : Dr. William E. Mott, Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division (EP-32) Washington, D.C. 20545 Dear Dr. Mott: Enclosed is the list of contaminated'or potentially contaminated sites that I promised to send you during our recent meeting. The sites have been broken down into the followi,ng four categories: 1. Sites with known contamination that have never been 1 icensed. 2. Formerly licensed sites with known contamination. 3. Currently licensed sites that are being decontaminated prior to decoronissioning. 4. A list of formerly licensed sites that need to be visited to determine if they have been properly decontaminated prior to decommissioning.

463

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Home > Features > Groups Content Group Activity By term Q & A Feeds Content type Blog entry Discussion Document Event Poll Question Keywords Author Apply Kyoung Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Posted by: Kyoung 14 Oct 2013 - 20:19 On Tuesday, October 2, the Geothermal Technology Office and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory held a 1/2-day NEPA workshop. The workshop was held at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, in conjunction... Tags: Categorical Exclusions, CX, Database, EA, EIS, FONSI, GEA, GRC, GRR, NEPA Jweers New Robust References! Posted by: Jweers 7 Aug 2013 - 18:23 Check out the new Reference Form. Adding... 1 comment(s) Tags: citation, citing, developer, formatting, reference, Semantic Mediawiki, wiki Graham7781

464

Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

geothermal geothermal Type Term Title Author Replies Last Post sort icon Blog entry geothermal Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Graham7781 5 Aug 2013 - 13:18 Blog entry geothermal GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Kyoung 9 Jul 2013 - 20:57 Blog entry geothermal GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Kyoung 2 May 2013 - 14:06 Groups Menu You must login in order to post into this group. Recent content Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC New Robust References! Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now Texas Legal Review GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting more Group members (12) Managers: Kyoung Recent members: AfifaAwan Dklein2012 Jweers AGill Agentile Kwitherbee Kjking Payne Dhoefner Twnrel Alevine 429 Throttled (bot load)

465

NUCLEAR REGULATORY,.COMMISSION REGION I  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

REGULATORY,.COMMISSION REGULATORY,.COMMISSION REGION I lY,.COMMISSION 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KlNG OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 194061415 GION I NOALE ROAD ENNSYLVANlA 194061415 MAY I5 1996 MAY I5 1996 Docket No. 040-07964 License No. SlJ (Rs Heyman Properties Attention: Mr. John S. Russo Facility Manager 333 Post Road West Westport, CT 06881 SUBJECT: INSPECTION NO. 040-07964/96-001 Dear Mr. Russo: On April 15, 1996, Todd J. Jackson of this office conducted a routine inspection at 737 Canal Street, Stamford, Connecticut of activities o Oliver Incorporated, authorized by Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) Lit SUB-00967. The inspection consisted of observations by the inspect0 interviews with personnel, and a radiological survey by the inspector Jackson was accompanied on this inspection by representatives of the

466

On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates Speaker(s): Richard Morgenstern Date: December 10, 2013 - 12:00pm - 1:00pm Location: 90-3122 Seminar Host/Point of Contact: Alan Sanstad Margaret Taylor Over the past several decades, the U.S. has seen a gradual reduction in economic regulation and a simultaneous increase in safety, health, environmental, and other social regulations. Especially with the prospect of regulation on greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, there is growing concern about the costs, effectiveness, and benefits of federal rules. While prospective or ex ante analyses of the benefits and costs of major federal regulations are now a standard part of government operations, retrospective or ex post analyses, focusing on measurements of actual

467

Depleted Uranium Uses: Regulatory Requirements and Issues  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 Depleted Uranium Uses Depleted Uranium Uses Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements and Issues and Issues Nancy L. Ranek Nancy L. Ranek Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory August 5, 1998 August 5, 1998 Beneficial Reuse '98 Beneficial Reuse '98 Knoxville, TN Knoxville, TN NOTES Work Performed for: Office of Facilities (NE-40) Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology U.S. Department of Energy Work Performed by: Environmental Assessment Division Argonne National Laboratory 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20024 Phone: 202/488-2417 E-mail: ranekn@smtplink.dis.anl.gov 2 2 2 Programmatic Environmental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) Impact Statement (PEIS) Draft PEIS Published 12/97 * Preferred Alternative = 100% Use

468

Modeling Emergence in Neuroprotective Regulatory Networks  

SciTech Connect

The use of predictive modeling in the analysis of gene expression data can greatly accelerate the pace of scientific discovery in biomedical research by enabling in silico experimentation to test disease triggers and potential drug therapies. Techniques that focus on modeling emergence, such as agent-based modeling and multi-agent simulations, are of particular interest as they support the discovery of pathways that may have never been observed in the past. Thus far, these techniques have been primarily applied at the multi-cellular level, or have focused on signaling and metabolic networks. We present an approach where emergence modeling is extended to regulatory networks and demonstrate its application to the discovery of neuroprotective pathways. An initial evaluation of the approach indicates that emergence modeling provides novel insights for the analysis of regulatory networks that can advance the discovery of acute treatments for stroke and other diseases.

Sanfilippo, Antonio P.; Haack, Jereme N.; McDermott, Jason E.; Stevens, S.L.; Stenzel-Poore, Mary

2013-01-05T23:59:59.000Z

469

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: National Grid Exceeds EPAct  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National National Grid Exceeds EPAct Requirements Deploying Natural Gas Technology to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: National Grid Exceeds EPAct Requirements Deploying Natural Gas Technology on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: National Grid Exceeds EPAct Requirements Deploying Natural Gas Technology on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: National Grid Exceeds EPAct Requirements Deploying Natural Gas Technology on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: National Grid Exceeds EPAct Requirements Deploying Natural Gas Technology on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: National Grid Exceeds EPAct Requirements Deploying Natural Gas Technology on Digg

470

Regulatory Highlights for March?August 2008  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Annual Product Quality Reviews ... FDA plans to conduct 500 foreign inspections in the fiscal year (FY) 2009 (compared with 332 in FY 2007) and currently has in place more than 70 cooperative arrangements with foreign counterparts. ... It is estimated that companies need several person-days to generate, review, and approve answers to each query received during regulatory evaluation, and that approximately 25% of such queries are related to drug substance information. ...

Derek Robinson

2008-09-03T23:59:59.000Z

471

E-Print Network 3.0 - abrogates regulatory function Sample Search...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

actions that are functionally equivalent... : Regulatory Taking Challenges to Local Environmental Regulation Environmental Practicum Memo: Regulatory... , how should a...

472

DOE Science Showcase - Neutron Science Research from DOE Databases | OSTI,  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Science Showcase - Neutron Science Research from DOE Databases DOE Science Showcase - Neutron Science Research from DOE Databases Additional neutron science research in DOE Databases Information Bridge Neutron scattering research was pioneered in 1946 by ORNL's Clifford G. Shull, winner of 1994 Nobel Prize in Physics. Access Shull's early research records in Energy Citations Database. Neutron scattering research was pioneered in 1946 by ORNL's Clifford G. Shull, winner of 1994 Nobel Prize in Physics. Access Shull's early research records in Energy Citations Database. Energy Citations Database DOE R&D Accomplishments DOE R&D Project Summaries DOE Data Explorer DOepatents Researchers at DOE labs, including Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), and Oak Ridge National Laboratory

473

DOE enforcement program roles and responsibilities: DOE handbook  

SciTech Connect

The Price-Anderson Act provides indemnification to DOE contractors who manage and conduct nuclear activities in the DOE complex. The government acts as an insurer for these contractors against any findings of liability from the nuclear activities of the contractor within the scope of its contract. 10 CFR Part 820 establishes the legal framework for implementing DOE`s Nuclear Safety Enforcement Program. Integration with other DOE organizations and programs would assure that the enforcement process properly considers the actual or potential safety significance of a violation when determining an appropriate enforcement sanction. Achieving a proactive contractor compliance assurance rather than a heavy enforcement hand, will require a foundation of cooperation and teamwork across DOE organizations. This handbook identifies the areas of interface for the DOE Enforcement Program and provides guidance on roles and responsibilities for the key DOE organizational areas. It complements DOE-HDBK-1087-95 and 1089-95.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

474

DOE Technical Standards Program: Online Approved DOE Technical Standards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Online Approved DOE Technical Standards Online Approved DOE Technical Standards No. 1001 – 2000 No. 3001 – 4000 No. 4001 – 5500 No. 5501 – 6000 No. 6001 – 6500 No. 7501 – 7750 Document Number Range 1001 – 2000 Number Title DOE-HDBK-1001-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Instructors (80 pages) PDF (226 KB) DOE-HDBK-1002-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Chemical Operators (70 pages) PDF (311 KB) DOE-HDBK-1003-96 Guide to Good Practices for Training and Qualification of Maintenance Personnel (106 pages) PDF (391 KB) DOE-HDBK-1010-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Classical Physics (142 pages) PDF (1120 KB) DOE-HDBK-1011/1-92 (Reaffirmed 1999) DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Electrical Science, Volume 1 of 4 (166 pages) PDF (4255 KB)

475

The regulatory pendulum in transfusion medicine  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Blood banking and the manufacture of blood products have been relatively outside the influence of regulatory authorities. Several developments contributed to a revision of this environment. The transmission of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome by blood products changed the perception of blood product safety and also spawned litigation and governmental inquiries. The blood banking industry has embraced, with varying degrees of enthusiasm, the principles of systematic quality management and good manufacturing practice, which has created a substantial subindustry and has contributed to a disproportionate focus on product quality. Conventional market forces have also gradually penetrated the traditional blood economies. The public and political focus has resulted in regulatory and policy efforts being concentrated on inappropriate areas. Several of the safety efforts can be arguably described as cost-ineffective while diverting attention and resources from more important issues. An improved integration into mainstream public health policy and incorporation of objectively measured risks into regulatory policy would do much to enhance the quality of the transfusion system. This can be achieved if regulators themselves are overseen through a process that ensures performance and accountability against objective and predefined standards. A further beneficial outcome from this approach could be the harmonization of blood safety and policy measures, the need for which is being felt increasingly worldwide.

Albert Farrugia

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

Microsoft Word - DOE Ex Parte Memo - 09 02 Mtg-09.09.10.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 10, 2010 September 10, 2010 By e-mail to: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulatory Law Office of the General Counsel Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0121 Re: Ex Parte Memorandum On September 2, 2010, the following participants held a meeting at the Department of Energy ("DOE"): Timothy Ballo and Emma Cheuse (Earthjustice); Kit Kennedy, Christine Chang, and Meg Waltner (Natural Resources Defense Council or "NRDC"); Cliff Majersik (Institute for Market Transformation or "IMT"). The following DOE staff were present in this meeting: General Counsel Scott Blake Harris, Daniel Cohen, Ami Grace-Tardy, and Bryan Miller

477

D:\0myfiles\DOE Policy (LBL) 2003\SMD2003.vp  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

S-0138 S-0138 Report to Congress: Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design U.S. Department of Energy April 30, 2003 Report to Congress: Impacts of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Proposal for Standard Market Design U.S. Department of Energy April 30, 2003 Acknowledgments This report was prepared by staff from the Office of Policy and International Affairs, under the direction of Jimmy Glotfelty, Senior Policy Advi- sor to the Secretary of Energy. Further information about this publication may be obtained from its principal author, David Meyer (David.Meyer @hq.doe.gov), who was ably assisted by Paul Carrier (Paul.Carrier@hq.doe.gov), Edward Watts (Edward.Watts@hq.doe.gov), and other Policy Office staff. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance provided by Lessly Goudarzi and Frances Wood of OnLocation,

478

DOE Federal Register Questions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COMMENTS-PAGE 1 COMMENTS-PAGE 1 Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration On May 11, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Request for Information (RFI) (NBP RFI: Communications Requirements) seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in understanding the communications requirement of utilities, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Smart Grid. The RFI also seeks to collect information about electricity infrastructure's current and projected communications requirements, as well as the types of networks and communications services that may be used for grid modernization, including specifically information on what types of communications capabilities utilities think that they will need and what type of communications capabilities the communications carriers think that they can

479

DOE/SEA-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM 10 ). As a result of the study, on August 19, 2005, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) issued a letter to Mirant requesting that Mirant "undertake such action as is necessary to ensure protection of human health and the environment, in the area surrounding the Potomac River Generating Station, including the potential reduction of levels of operation, or potential shutdown of the facility." On August 24, 2005, in response to VDEQ's August 19, 2005, letter, Mirant decided to shut down all five generating units at the Plant. Figure S-1. The location of the Plant in relation to the central Washington, D.C. area. DOE/SEA-04 November 2006 S-3 DOE Action On August 24, 2005, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) filed an

480

DOE/SEA-04  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

μm in aerodynamic μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM 10 ). As a result of the study, on August 19, 2005, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) issued a letter to Mirant requesting that Mirant "undertake such action as is necessary to ensure protection of human health and the environment, in the area surrounding the Potomac River Generating Station, including the potential reduction of levels of operation, or potential shutdown of the facility." On August 24, 2005, in response to VDEQ's August 19, 2005, letter, Mirant decided to shut down all five generating units at the Plant. Figure S-1. The location of the Plant in relation to the central Washington, D.C. area. DOE/SEA-04 November 2006 S-3 DOE Action On August 24, 2005, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) filed an

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "regulatory burden doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

BPA / Doe Memo Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-90) Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-90) David Byrnes TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager, KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Naches River Water Treatment Plant Intake Screening Project Project No: 2002-052-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 4.23 Intake and Return Diversion Screens, 9.23 Construction: Erosion and Sediment Control Structures. Location: Yakima, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the City of Yakima Description of the Proposed Action: BPA is proposing to fund the upgrade of the intake structure for the City of Yakima's Water Treatment Plant. The existing traveling water screen at

482

DOE Data Explorer  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DDE DDE Discovering data and non-text information in the Department of Energy DOE Data Explorer What's New About DDE DOE Data Centers OSTI's Data ID Service Featured Collection Featured Data Collection Visit CEDR View the archive Search Find Advanced Search Options × Full Text: Bibliographic Data: Creator/Author: Title: Subject: Identifier Numbers: Host Website: Research Org: Sponsor/Funding Org: Contributing Orgs: Type: Select Type Publication Date: from Date: to to Date: Sort: By Relevance By Title Limit to: Matches with DOI only Collections only (no DOIs) Clear Find Advanced Search Basic Search Browse DDE Content All Titles (alphabetically) Sponsor/Funding Organizations Types of Data and Non-text Other Related Organizations Subject Categories Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their

483

DOE CONTRACTOR PENSION PLANS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-13 1-13 For use in M&O and non-M&O cost reimbursement solicitations and contracts where work had been previously performed under a DOE M&O contract and the successor Contractor is (a) required to employ all or part of the former Contractor's workforce and sponsors the employee pension and benefit plans; or (b) retains sponsorship of benefit plans that survive performance of the contract work scope. Contracts in this latter category include, but are not limited to, environmental remediation, infrastructure services and other site-specific project completion contracts. DOE-H-1002 EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION: PAY AND BENEFITS (a) Contractor Employee Compensation Plan The Contractor shall submit, for Contracting Officer approval, by (fill-in

484

DOE's Offices of Environmental  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statement of Intent (SOI) Statement of Intent (SOI) between the US Dept of Energy (DOE) and the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) on decommissioning and waste management was renewed for a further five years during the Waste Management conference in Phoenix, AZ in March. The signatories to the SOI were the DOE's Offices of Environmental Management (EM) and Nuclear Energy (NE) and the NDA, with NE being a new addition to the arrangement. The Office of Environment Management is responsible for the clean-up of the former nuclear weapons' sites and the relationship between them and the NDA has already resulted in collaboration in a number of areas such as thermal treatments for stabilization of wastes, plutonium management, aging facilities management, non-standard fuels

485

DOE Patents Database - Innovations  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

DOE Innovations DOE Innovations Breakthroughs and Award Winners from the last 2 decades... Capillary Electrophoresis Ames Laboratory This technology allows multiple samples of substances to be analyzed simultaneously, providing both speed and accuracy. Has won multiple R&D 100 awards for inventor Ed Yeung and has been licensed by Spectromedix. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,324,401 and 5,582,705. Ultrananocrystalline Diamond (UNCD) Argonne National Laboratory Greatly surpasses other diamond film technologies with commercial potential, and can be used in a broad and diverse range of applications from macro to nanodevices, 2006 FLC Award Winner. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,620,512 and others. T7 Gene Expression System Brookhaven National Laboratory This patent family has been licensed to over 700 commercial entities

486

DOE/EIS-0284  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2007 A-1 2007 A-1 APPENDIX A. OTHER RELATED GHG PROGRAMS AND INITIATIVES The Program is only one program aimed at reducing GHG emissions. There are a number of actions by international entities, presidential initiatives, DOE, other federal agencies, state jurisdictions, and NGOs that, in some way, complement the intent of the Program. The following list of GHG reduction programs is provided for information purposes (and is not necessarily inclusive of all GHG programs and initiatives). A.1 INTERNATIONAL TREATIES, PROGRAMS, AND POLICIES The Rio Climate Treaty was signed in June 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil by more than 150 nations including the U.S. It has been ratified by many nations and seeks to stabilize the concentration of GHG concentrations; however, it does not set binding emissions limitations. Nations are urged to adopt their

487

DOE STGWG Group  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STGWG Group STGWG Group The State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG) is one of the intergovernmental organizations with which the DOE EM office works with. They meet twice yearly for updates to the EM projects. They were formed in 1989. It is comprised of several state legislators and tribal staff and leadership from states in proximity to DOE's environmental cleanup sites of the following states: New York, South Carolina, Ohio, Washington, New Mexico, Idaho, California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, Nevada, Oregon, Tennessee and Texas. The tribal membership is composed of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, the Isleta Pueblo, Jemez Pueblo, Navajo Nation, Nez Perce Tribe, Santa Clara Pueblo, Pueblo de San Ildefonso, Seneca Nation of Indians, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the

488

DOE-MIRMISBWG  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FEE-13-1998 14:45 FEE-13-1998 14:45 . . - . DOE-MIRMISBWG 7 2 . r i-.1 I-' ? * \,, ? / :' , 2' .' 513 I365 4489 P. 02/11 .1??y 7 -- RADIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY OF FO,RMER MONSANTO FACILITIES (Unit III and Warehouse) DAYTON, OHIO Report Date: 4 September 1997 Survey Date: 27 Ahgust 1997 Prepared by: Mark L, Mays, Chief Radiation Safety Branch Sponsored by: Miamisburg Environmental Management Project Office Ohio Field Office U.S. Department of Energy Conducted by: Radiation Safety Branch Offke of Environmental Management ggth Air Base Wing U.S. Department of the Air Force In Cooperation With: Southwest District Office Ohio Environmental Protection Agency UaEKi Ohio Environmedal Protection Agency Bureau of Radiological Health Ohio Department of Health FEB-13-1998 14:46 DOE-MIFIMISBURG 513 865 4489 P.03111

489

DOE F 5634  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 (09/2012) Replaces DOE F470.8 (05-05) All Other Editions are Obsolete U.S. Department of Energy SURVEY/INSPECTION REPORT FORM 1. Type: Survey: Initial Periodic Special Termination OA Reviews: NPR EPR Self-Assessment 2. Report #: 3. Facility Name: 4. a. Facility Code: b. RIS Code: 5. Survey Date(s): 6. a. Findings: Yes No b. Findings Against Other Facilities:

490

DOE/CF-0088  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Volume 5 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-0088 Volume 5 Department of Energy FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management April 2013 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Volume 5 Table of Contents Section Appropriation Account Summary .......................................................................................................................................... AP Appropriation Language .................................................................................................................................................... EM-1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................ EM-3

491

1979 DOE statistical symposium  

SciTech Connect

The 1979 DOE Statistical Symposium was the fifth in the series of annual symposia designed to bring together statisticians and other interested parties who are actively engaged in helping to solve the nation's energy problems. The program included presentations of technical papers centered around exploration and disposal of nuclear fuel, general energy-related topics, and health-related issues, and workshops on model evaluation, risk analysis, analysis of large data sets, and resource estimation.

Gardiner, D.A.; Truett T. (comps. and eds.)

1980-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

492

About DOE Green Energy  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

About DOE Green Energy Search DOE Green Energy to find publicly available bibliographic citations, technical reports and patent information on different types of renewable energy resources and energy conservation, such as solar, wind, bioenergy, hydroelectric and geothermal. For example, R&D on different types of vehicle technology, as well as studies regarding electricity and other power sources, are available. Subject areas include but are not limited to hydrogen, solar energy, tidal and wave power, energy storage, and direct energy conversion. When you search the Green Energy portal, your keyword query will be mapped to scientific concepts. This semantic technique, called "keyword to concept" mapping, is applied to your search behind the scenes and helps hone your search for more efficient knowledge access and discovery. This means that you will receive results that allow you to explore more narrow concepts, related concepts, or even broader concepts. DOE Green Energy affords you the use of the familiar and simple search box - yet still provides the benefits of an advanced search technology to help get at the information you need.

493

DOE-HTGR-88111  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HTGR-88111 HTGR-88111 Revision 0 AUG 0 5 1991 . _ I . .....~ .. . . . . . - . . . . . . GRAPHITE DESIGN HANDBOOK AUTHORSICONTRACTORS GENERAL ATOMICS BUnON OF THIS DOCUMENT I S UNLlMmD ISSUED BY GENERAL ATOMICS FOR THE DEPARTMEW OF ENERGY CONTRACT DE-AC03-88SF17367 SEPTEMBER 1988 D 0 E- H TG R- 8 8 1 1 1 Revision 0 9 0 9 5 9 7 / 0 p b 7 ~ rJ T shall be made of c ~ c A R G D DOE Patent Coun 7 - 4 - S ( GRAPHITE DESIGN HANDBOOK DtSPRIBUflON OF THIS DOCUMENP I S UNLlMm Thle daoument is Issued By General Atomics P.O. Box 85608 San Diego, California 92138-5608 DOE CONTRACT DE-AC03-88SF17367 GA Project 6 3 0 0 SEPTEMBER 1988 RoU 2\66 GA 1 4 8 5 (REV 4/88) GENERAL ATOMICS IISCIPLINE SYSTEM 0 11 ISSUE SUMMARY DOC. TYPE PROJECT ISSUE NO./LTR. MAN 6300 DOE-HTGR-88111 0 l U A L l T Y ASSURANCE LEVEL N /A

494

DOE Energy Challenge Project  

SciTech Connect

Project Objectives: 1. Promote energy efficiency concepts in undergraduate and graduate education. 2. Stimulate and interest in pulp and paper industrial processes, which promote and encourage activities in the area of manufacturing design efficiency. 3. Attract both industrial and media attention. Background and executive Summary: In 1997, the Institute of Paper Science and Technology in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy developed a university design competition with an orientation to the Forest Products Industry. This university design competition is in direct alignment with DOEs interests in instilling in undergraduate education the concepts of developing energy efficient processes, minimizing waste, and providing environmental benefits and in maintaining and enhancing the economic competitiveness of the U.S. forest products industry in a global environment. The primary focus of the competition is projects, which are aligned with the existing DOE Agenda 2020 program for the industry and the lines of research being established with the colleges comprising the Pulp and Paper Education and Research Alliance (PPERA). The six design competitions were held annually for the period 1999 through 2004.

Frank Murray; Michael Schaepe

2009-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

495

DOE Roadmap: Chapter 3  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3. Human Radiation Experiments Associated With DOE and Its Predecessors 3. Human Radiation Experiments Associated With DOE and Its Predecessors Introduction This section contains a listing, description, and selected references for documented human radiation experiments sponsored, supported, or performed by the Department of Energy or its predecessors. The list represents work completed by the Office of Human Radiation Experiments through December 1994, and is a work in progress. Additional experiments will be added as they are identified, documented, and confirmed. The experiment list is available on the Internet and will be updated over time. This list includes experiments released at Secretary O'Leary's June 1994 press conference, as well as additional studies identified during the six months that followed. Cross-references are provided for experiments originally released at the press conference. Some of the 48 experiments released in June 1994 are not listed here, as continuing research is necessary. In the interest of assembling the most comprehensive information possible, a list of experiments described in the 1986 congressional report entitled American Nuclear Guinea Pigs: Three Decades of Radiation Experiments on U.S. Citizens is provided as an appendix. It should be noted that information about some studies in American Nuclear Guinea Pigs has been updated and included in the current DOE list; further update efforts are ongoing.

496

Transportation Security Rulemaking Activities at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AT THE AT THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION R. Clyde Ragland, P.E. Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response 2011 DOE National Transportation Stakeholders Forum May 11, 2011 2 NRC Focus Prior to September 11, 2001 * Historically, NRC Transportation Security Regulations Focused on Highest Risk Radioactive Material, consisted of Special Nuclear Material (SNM) and Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) NRC Actions Since September 11, 2001 * Domestically, reviewed materials transported by NRC licensees and re- evaluated security requirements considering: - applicable threats to shipments - material considerations - magnitude of adverse consequences * Internationally, participated in the development of the IAEA Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive

497

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. XX, NO. X, DECEMBER 2007 1 Spatial Model for Energy Burden Balancing and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

by multi-hop relaying, it is critical to provide mechanisms to conserve energy due to nodes' limitedIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. XX, NO. X, DECEMBER 2007 1 Spatial Model for Energy Burden Balancing and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks Detecting Bursty Events Seung Jun Baek and Gustavo de

de Veciana, Gustavo

498

DOE/EA-1607 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DISPOSITION OF DOE EXCESS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

µCi/cc microcuries per cubic centimeter µCi/cc microcuries per cubic centimeter MAP mitigation action plan MEI maximally exposed individual mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mrem millirem mSv millisievert MT metric ton MTCA Model Toxics Control Act MTU metric tons of uranium N/A not applicable Final Environmental Assessment: Disposition of DOE Excess Depleted Uranium, Natural Uranium, and Low-Enriched Uranium vi NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEF National Enrichment Facility NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NU natural uranium NUF 6 natural uranium hexafluoride pCi/g picocuries per gram PEIS programmatic environmental impact statement PM 2.5 particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less PM 10 particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less

499

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 79 Fed. Reg. 37963 (July 3, 2014).

500

C:\My Documents\FORMS\DOE F.580.1.cdr  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OMB OMB Control Number 1910-5121 STATEMENT REQUIRED FOR OBTAINING High-Risk PROPERTY BEING RELEASED FROM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) CONTROL TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION Authority: Principal Purpose(s): Routine Uses: Disclosure: (Please read Privacy Act Statement before completing this form. If additional space is required, use separate sheets and identify by Block Number) Sale/Transfer Document Control Number Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration (NA-1) DOE F 580.1 (Rev Date 05/03) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY END-USE CERTIFICATE AGENCY APPROVAL FOR SALE/TRANSFER OF NSG TRIGGER LIST/ DUAL USE ITEMS OR U.S. MUNITIONS LIST ITEMS: Privacy Act Statement OMB Burden Disclosure Statement 10 USC 136; 40USC 471; 50 USC 2411; 22 USC 2751; and EO 9397. Determine applicant eligibility to participate in the DOE sales and/or non-Federal transfer programs and ensure