National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for regulatory burden comments

  1. NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Reducing Regulatory Burden NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Department of Energy's efforts to make its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. PDF icon NEMA_Comments_on_Reducing_Reg_Burden.pdf More Documents & Publications NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory

  2. .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RFI | Department of Energy .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Comments from Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI PDF icon .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment

  3. AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments Regulatory Burden RFI AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). PDF icon AHAM Comments_DOE Reg Review Sept 2012_FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment AHAM Retrospective Preliminary

  4. Comments on reducing regulatory burden | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    reducing regulatory burden Comments on reducing regulatory burden Comments on reducing regulatory burden from Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces, and accessories PDF icon Comments on reducing regulatory burden More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI [76 FR 75798] Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules 2014-09-18 Issuance: Energy

  5. Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Comments on reducing regulatory burden

  6. NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) entitled, "Reducing Regulatory Burden," published in the Federal Register on May 15, 2012. PDF icon NAESCO_Cmts_Reducing_Reg_Burden_RFI_Final.pdf More Documents & Publications FPCC Regulatory

  7. DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments Regulatory Burden RFI DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI These comments are submitted by Rheem Manufacturing Company in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information on existing regulations that should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. PDF icon Reg_Review_DOE_comts_RFI.pdf More Documents & Publications Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third

  8. Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third RFI Comment Extension |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy RFI Comment Extension Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third RFI Comment Extension This notice announces that the period for submitting comments on the Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' is extended to June 19, 2012. PDF icon ReducRegBurden_EO_13563_Third_RFI_Comt_ Ext.pdf More Documents & Publications Fourth RFI Comment on

  9. DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is

  10. NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Department of Energy's efforts to make its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. PDF icon NEMA Comments on Reducing REgulatory Burden July 2014 More Documents & Publications NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA

  11. Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI Reducing Regulatory Burden, Request for Information, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 23, February 3, 2011 PDF icon Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules DOE_05_18_2011.pdf HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment

  12. Sixth RFI Comment On Reducing Regulatory Burden

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy(Department or DOE) is...

  13. FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. PDF icon FINAL_CA_IOU_comment_letter.pdf More Documents & Publications Comments on Docket ID:

  14. DOE Seeks Comments on its Preliminary Plan to Reduce Regulatory Burden |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Comments on its Preliminary Plan to Reduce Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Comments on its Preliminary Plan to Reduce Regulatory Burden July 13, 2011 - 2:02pm Addthis The Department of Energy issued a notice seeking comment on its Preliminary Plan to implement Executive Order 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review". The plan describes how the Department intends to conduct retrospective review of its regulations. The Department developed its Preliminary

  15. Re: Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Burden RFI Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Hearth Patio & Barbecue Association comments on Regulatory Burden RFI PDF icon Re: Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Regulatory Reduction RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 6123, February 3, 2011

  16. NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Department of Energys efforts to make its regulatory program more effective and...

  17. Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    April 15. 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Via Email: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Subject: Reducing Regulatory Burden, Request for Information, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 23, February 3, 2011 Dear Mr. Cohen: The American Gas Association (AGA) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the subject Department of Energy

  18. AHAM Comments_DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden July 2014_FINAL (00029367).DOC

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    8, 2014 By E-Mail Jengeih Tamba U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Ms. Tamba: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 79 Fed. Reg. 37963 (July 3, 2014). AHAM represents manufacturers of major, portable and floor care home appliances, and

  19. AHAM Comments_DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden July 2015_FINAL (00039527).DOC

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7, 2015 By E-Mail Aaron Stevenson U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Stevenson: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 79 Fed. Reg. 37963 (July 3,

  20. Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Burden Reducing Regulatory Burden Request for information on reducing regulatory burden PDF icon Reducing Regulatory Burden More Documents & Publications Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Reducing Regulatory Burden Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments)

  1. Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Hearth & Home Technologies comments on Regulatory Burden RFI PDF icon Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) Re: Regulatory Burden RFI RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF

  2. AHAM Comments_DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden July 2015_FINAL...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    standards, but in many cases, DOE has failed to ... Minimally acceptable engineering analysis and sound policy conclusions ... opportunity for the public to comment on the ...

  3. Microsoft Word - Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments regarding...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Mr. Aaron Stevenson U.S. Department of Energy Office of the ... Stevenson, The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) appreciates the ...

  4. Microsoft Word - NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, Final.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ________________________________________________________ 1615 M Street, NW, Suite 800 Tel 202/822-0950 Washington, DC 20036 Fax 202/822-0955 http://www.naesco.org May 29, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Sir or Madam: The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Request for Information

  5. Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Hussmann manufacturer of commercial refrigeration products, appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's Request for Comments on the topic of the Regulatory ...

  6. Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    (Reply Comments) | Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) Comments on RFI on reducing regulatory burden PDF icon Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) More Documents & Publications Re: Regulatory Burden RFI RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue

  7. Microsoft Word - Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments regarding small motor regulations 17July2015 v5_1.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    November 28, 2 July 17, 2015 VIA EMAIL TO: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Mr. Aaron Stevenson U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Assistant General Counsel Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency 1000 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20585 Reducing Regulatory Burden: Request for Information (RFI) Dear Mr. Stevenson, The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached comments on the Request for Information to Reduce Regulatory

  8. Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Cheniere Energy, Inc. ("Cheniere") submits the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE" or "Department") request for information and comments concerning "Reducing Regulatory Burden" published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011. PDF icon Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI [76 FR 75798] SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS FOR CHENIERE MARKETING, LLC - DK. NO. 12-99-LNG - ORDER 3164 Comments on

  9. .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Comments from...

  10. Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Burden RFI Regulatory Burden RFI These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011 requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. PDF icon Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI from AHRI

  11. Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Regulatory Burden RFI Regulatory Burden RFI These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011 requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. PDF icon Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI from AHRI

  12. DOE Extends Comment Period for Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy today announces an extension of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review...

  13. Regulatory Burden RFI: Revitalization of DOE's Role as a Regulatory

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Watchdog | Department of Energy RFI: Revitalization of DOE's Role as a Regulatory Watchdog Regulatory Burden RFI: Revitalization of DOE's Role as a Regulatory Watchdog This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments highlighting four issues: PDF icon CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments DOE Ex Parte

  14. Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Request for information on reducing regulatory burden PDF icon Reducing Regulatory Burden More Documents & Publications Reducing Regulatory Burden Reducing Regulatory Burden

  15. Re: Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations Re: Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations Comments from Edison Electric Institute on DOE's Request for Information regarding the burden of DOE regulations. PDF icon Re: Request for Information on Regulatory Burden of DOE Regulations More Documents & Publications Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Comments on Docket

  16. Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Request for Information on reducing regulatory burden, 76 Fed. Reg. 6123 (Feb. 3, 2011). PDF icon Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications WPN 00-5: Approval of Replacement Refrigerators and Electric Water Heaters as Allowable Weatherization Measures TEE-0012 - In the Matter of Electrolux Home Products, Inc. TEE-0022 - In the Matter of Maytag

  17. Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council and our more than 1.3 million members and online activists, we submit the following comments in response to the Department of Energys (DOE)...

  18. Regulatory Burden RFI from Bodine Electric Company | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Bodine Electric Company Regulatory Burden RFI from Bodine Electric Company The following is a response from Bodine Electric Company on unnecessarily burdensome regulations involving Energy Conservation Standards for Small Electric Vehicles. PDF icon Bodine Electric Company Comment.PDF More Documents & Publications Consumer Electronics Association Comment Regulatory Burden RFI from AHRI DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules

  19. Regulatory Burden RFI from AHRI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AHRI Regulatory Burden RFI from AHRI These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. PDF icon DOE Com Reg Burden RFI 1-4-12.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI Air-Conditioning,

  20. Regulatory Burden RFI [76 FR 75798] | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RFI [76 FR 75798] Regulatory Burden RFI [76 FR 75798] The following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand [IRCO], Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces and accessories therefore. --- Ingersoll Rand appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's request for information on "Reducing Regulatory Burden" in the spirit of Executive Order 13563. PDF icon

  1. Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012). PDF icon AHAM_Comments_DOE_Reg_Rieww_2012_FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment AHAM Retrospective

  2. Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory Burden

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RFI (Federal Register August 8, 2012) | Department of Energy Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory Burden RFI (Federal Register August 8, 2012) Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory Burden RFI (Federal Register August 8, 2012) On behalf of the Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association, I am providing the following comments and information in response to DOE's request. The Association represents residential builders,

  3. Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' PDF icon RRB_EO_13563.pdf More Documents & Publications Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third RFI

  4. Regulatory Burden RFI from the Hussmann Corporation | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Hussmann Corporation Regulatory Burden RFI from the Hussmann Corporation The following link provides the Hussmann Corporation's response to a list of questions from the December 5, 2011,RFI. PDF icon Hussmann Corp. List of Questions for Commenters.pdf More Documents & Publications 2014-02-07 Issuance: Alternative Efficiency Determination Methods and Test Procedures for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers; Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001

  5. Microsoft Word - Cover Letter Regulatory Burden RFI 4-15-11 | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Cover Letter Regulatory Burden RFI 4-15-11 Microsoft Word - Cover Letter Regulatory Burden RFI 4-15-11 Comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy request for public comment on "Improving DOE Regulations," published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2011. PDF icon Microsoft Word - Cover Letter Regulatory Burden RFI 4-15-11 More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI - Docket No. DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective

  6. Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 76 Fed.

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) | Department of Energy 6 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). PDF icon Reg review - DOE RFI - EEI cmts 2-3-12.pdf More Documents & Publications EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76

  7. Regulatory Burden RFI from HPBA

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) is pleased to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Request for Information...

  8. Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Request for information on reducing regulatory burden, E.O. 13563 PDF icon Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 More Documents & Publications Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Reducing Regulatory Burden Reducing Regulatory Burden

  9. Regulatory Burden Request for Information | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Request for Information Regulatory Burden Request for Information Response to Regulatory Burden RFI PDF icon Regulatory Burden Request for Information More Documents & Publications DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules DOE_05_18_2011.pdf Regulatory Burden RFI - Docket No. DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001

  10. Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI). In the RFI, the Department of Energy (DOE) is asking for comments on ways to streamline its regulations and to eliminate unnecessary ones, so as to make the regulations less burdensome and more effective. PDF icon Reg review -

  11. Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is again asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. PDF icon Reg_review_ EEI_cmts.pdf More Documents & Publications Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden

  12. Regulatory Review Comment Section | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment » Regulatory Review Comment Section Regulatory Review Comment Section DOE Comments on Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste

  13. CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments

  14. Regulatory Burden RFI - Hussmann Corporation Response

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Regulatory Burden RFI - Hussmann Corporation Response January 3, 2012 Below are the list of questions with answers from the December 5 RFI: (1) How can the Department best promote meaningful periodic reviews of its existing rules and how can it best identify those rules that might be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed? DOE should maintain a list of all manufacturers impacted by legislation/rules and make sure these manufacturers are notified of all rule changes. A full review cycle

  15. Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) Comments on RFI on...

  16. The Department of Energy's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden Submitted on June 18, 2012 On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council and our more than 1.3 million members and online activists, we submit the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden. (77 Federal Register 28518, May 15, 2012) NRDC has spent decades working to build and improve the Department of Energy's ("DOE") federal

  17. Microsoft Word - Cover Letter Regulatory Burden RFI 4-15-11

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    13, 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen, On behalf of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), I respectfully submit the attached comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) request for public comment on "Improving DOE Regulations," published in the

  18. Fourth RFI_Comment on Regulatory Review.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    47328 Vol. 77, No. 153 Wednesday, August 8, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties

  19. Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Burden More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI AHAM Retrospective Preliminary Plan

  20. Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting...

  1. Reducing Regulatory Burden - EO 13563 Retrospective Review |...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy: Recommendations to the NRC Committee on Research Universities...

  2. Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Fifth RFI

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy(Department or DOE) is...

  3. Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third RFI

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is...

  4. Regulatory Burden RFI Executive Order 13563 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Executive Order 13563 Regulatory Burden RFI Executive Order 13563 The situation we described last year (see below) has not improved. We are waiting for additional rules from DOE but don't believe they'll provide the needed relief from regulatory burden. This past year we've invested $250,000 in energy testing. Those resources could have been used to develop new and better products. We expect to invest more dollars in 2012. PDF icon RFI_Exec_Order_13563.pdf More Documents & Publications

  5. Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Burden RFI_July 2015_FINAL (00039560) More Documents & Publications Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012)

  6. Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden On behalf of the...

  7. EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    (Dec. 5, 2011) | Department of Energy EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. PDF icon

  8. RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF PDF icon RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF More Documents & Publications Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI

  9. Regulatory Burden RFI - Docket No. DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy - Docket No. DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Regulatory Burden RFI - Docket No. DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Response to Request for Information on "Reducing Regulatory Burden," 76 Fed. Reg. 6123 (Feb. 3, 2011) PDF icon Regulatory Burden RFI - Docket No. DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI: Revitalization of DOE's Role as a Regulatory Watchdog DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules DOE_05_18_2011.pdf

  10. Consumer Electronics Association Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Consumer Electronics Association Comment Consumer Electronics Association Comment The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) is the preeminent trade association promoting growth in the $285 billion U.S. consumer electronics industry. PDF icon CEA comments re DOE Regulatory Burden RFI_7-17-15 More Documents & Publications Comments of consumer electronics association Re: NBP RFI: Data Access AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI

  11. Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. PDF icon Fourth

  12. DOE Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments DOE Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded or repealed. PDF icon

  13. FPCC Regulatory Barriers Submittal

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Federal Performance Contracting Coalition (FPCC) appreciates the opportunity to comment on reducing regulatory burdens on the Federal government, specifically as they pertain to federal energy...

  14. Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    (NARUC) on the Smart Grid RFI | Department of Energy from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) on the Smart Grid RFI Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) on the Smart Grid RFI The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on this Request for Information (RFI) regarding the policy and logistical challenges of the

  15. Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is again asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. PDF icon Reg review - DOE RFI -...

  16. AHAM Comments_DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden July 2014_FINAL...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AHAM represents manufacturers of major, portable and floor care home appliances, and suppliers to the industry. AHAM's more than 150 members employ tens of thousands of people in ...

  17. MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energys (DOEs) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that...

  18. Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). | Department of Energy Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). I have reviewed the Request For Information

  19. DOE Reg. Burden RFI

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    January 4, 2012 Page 1 January 4, 2012 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory

  20. National Electrical Manufacturers Association Comment | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Comment National Electrical Manufacturers Association Comment The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached comments on the Request for Information to Reduce Regulatory Burden as announced in the U.S. Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 127, beginning on page 38019. PDF icon Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments regarding small motor regulations 17July2015 v5_1 More Documents & Publications National Electrical Manufacturers

  1. DOE Reg. Burden RFI

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    March 21, 2011 Page 1 March 21, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011 requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its

  2. Zero Zone Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Zero Zone Comment Zero Zone Comment These comments are submitted by Zero Zone Inc., a manufacturer of CRE equipment, in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. PDF icon Zero Zone comments More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI Executive Order 13563 certification, compliance and

  3. Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is again...

  4. Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment These comments are submitted by Goodman Global, Inc. ("Goodman") in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) appearing in the Federal Register on July 3, 2014. PDF icon 07-18-2014 Goodman Comments on Regulatory Burden RFI.PDF More Documents & Publications 2014-06-25 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnace Fans; Final Rule ISSUANCE 2015-08-21:

  5. Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments Comments to DOE on Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Regulations for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment EO 13563 Preliminary Plan PDF icon Microsoft Word - Lochinvar Comments -EO 13563 Preliminary Plan.docx More Documents & Publications Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulatory Burden RFI AHRI Preliminary Plan for Retrospective

  6. Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment These comments are submitted by Goodman Global, Inc. ("Goodman") in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) appearing in the Federal Register on July 3, 2014. PDF icon 07-18-2014 Goodman Comments on Regulatory Burden RFI.PDF More Documents & Publications 2014-06-25 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnace Fans; Final Rule 2014-08-28 Issuance:

  7. Summary and analysis of public comments on NUREG-1317: Regulatory options for nuclear plant license renewal: Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ligon, D.M.; Seth, S.S.

    1989-03-01

    On August 29, 1988, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on nuclear plant license renewal and solicited public comments on NUREG-1317, ''Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal.'' NUREG-1317 presents a discussion of fifteen topics involving technical, environmental, and procedural issues and poses a set of related questions. As part of its ongoing task for the NRC, The MITRE Corporation has summarized and analyzed the public comments received. Fifty-three written comments were received. Of these, 83 percent were from nuclear industry representatives; the remaining comments represented federal and state agencies, public interest groups, and a private citizen.

  8. DOE Ex Parte Memorandum - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Memorandum - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness DOE Ex Parte Memorandum - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is submitting this memorandum pursuant to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Guidance on Ex Parte Communications. PDF icon Center_for_Reg_Effectiveness.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments Regulatory Burden RFI: Revitalization of DOE's Role as a Regulatory

  9. Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) Regulatory

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Burden RFI | Department of Energy Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) Regulatory Burden RFI Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) Regulatory Burden RFI These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the August 8, 2012 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its

  10. The following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Sol

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces and accessories therefore. --- Ingersoll Rand appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's request for information on "Reducing Regulatory Burden" in the spirit of Executive Order 13563 ---- It is ironic that the response interval for the RFI on reducing regulatory burden overlaps the

  11. Microsoft Word - MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review 5-29-2012

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    111 Wilson Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, VA 22201 Tel: 703.558.0400 Fax: 703.558.0401 http://www.manufacturedhousing.org info@mfghome.org U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program Mailstop EE-2J 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585-1585 May 29, 2012 Reference: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) May

  12. AHAM Comments_DOE Reg Review Sept 2012_FINAL.pdf

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    September 7, 2012 By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). AHAM

  13. Information Technology Industry Council Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Information Technology Industry Council Comment Information Technology Industry Council Comment The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) appreciates the opportunity to submit comments in response to the Regulatory Burden RFI.1 ITI represents the leading global innovators of information and communications technology (ICT), an industry committed to developing energy-efficient solutions both for our own products and to help enable energy efficiency in other more energy intensive sectors.

  14. Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. PDF icon DOE Reg Burden

  15. VIA EMAIL TO: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Steven Croley U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    July 17, 2015 VIA EMAIL TO: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Steven Croley U.S. Department of Energy Office of General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585 RE: DOE Regulatory Burden RFI INTRODUCTION The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) appreciates the opportunity to submit comments in response to the Regulatory Burden RFI. 1 ITI represents the leading global innovators of information and communications technology (ICT), an industry committed to

  16. DOE Com Reg Burden RFI 9-7-12.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    September 7, 2012 Page 1 September 7, 2012 Daniel Cohen, Esq. Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the August 8, 2012 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its

  17. O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS database\DOE\2011\DOE-HQ-2011-0014 - Daniel Cohen - GC\Comments from FDMS\Charles W Adams DRAFT-0005.html

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    %20Daniel%20Cohen%20-%20GC/Comments%20from%20FDMS/Charles%20W%20Adams%20DRAFT-0005.html[3/23/2011 2:17:13 PM] PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: March 23, 2011 Received: March 21, 2011 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 80c0d05f Comments Due: April 04, 2011 Submission Type: Web Docket: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Reducing Regulatory Burden Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden Document: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-DRAFT-0005 Comment on FR Doc # 2011-02368 Submitter Information Name: Charles W Adams

  18. O:\IM-20\E-Government Program Office\FDMS\FDMS database\DOE\2011\DOE-HQ-2011-0014 - Daniel Cohen - GC\Comments from FDMS\Dan Manole DRAFT-0004.html

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    14%20-%20Daniel%20Cohen%20-%20GC/Comments%20from%20FDMS/Dan%20Manole%20DRAFT-0004.html[3/23/2011 2:21:55 PM] PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: March 23, 2011 Received: March 21, 2011 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 80c0d039 Comments Due: April 04, 2011 Submission Type: Web Docket: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Reducing Regulatory Burden Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden Document: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-DRAFT-0004 Comment on FR Doc # 2011-02368 Submitter Information Name: Dan Manole Address:

  19. EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. PDF icon RegReview...

  20. CA IOUs Comment Letter

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this

  1. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA): status report and guidance for regulatory application. Draft report for comment

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    1984-02-01

    This document describes the current status of the methodologies used in probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and provides guidance for the application of the results of PRAs to the nuclear reactor regulatory process. The PRA studies that have been completed or are underway are reviewed. The levels of maturity of the methodologies used in a PRA are discussed. Insights derived from PRAs are listed. The potential uses of PRA results for regulatory purposes are discussed.

  2. Comments

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Comments by the Energy Storage Association to the Department of Energy Electricity Advisory Council March 13, 2014 Good afternoon. My name is Katherine Hamilton and I serve as Policy Director for the Energy Storage Association, an international trade association that was established over 20 years ago to foster the development of energy storage technologies. Since then our mission has been the promotion, development and commercialization of competitive and reliable energy storage delivery systems

  3. Regulatory Tools

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Regulatory Tools Home CRA - 2004 Final Recertification Decision CRA Comments & Responses CCA - 1996 CRA CARDs & TSDs CCA CARDs & TSDs Regulatory Tools Title 40 CFR Part 191 Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes. Title 40 CFR Part 194 Criteria for the Certification and Re-Certification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the 40 CFR Part 191 Disposal Regulations.

  4. Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent

  5. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. The public comments on the Draft WIR Evaluation were submitted to...

  6. Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory Burden RFI (Federal Register August 8, 2012) Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association Regulatory ...

  7. CRA Comments & Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CRA Comments & Responses Home CRA - 2004 Final Recertification Decision CRA Comments & Responses CCA - 1996 CRA CARDs & TSDs CCA CARDs & TSDs Regulatory Tools Completeness Determination-Related Correspondence All EPA & DOE correspondence related to the determination of completeness and the CRA are provided below. Letter Transmitting EPA's CRA Completeness Determination (9/29/05) Notification of Completeness Determination EPA Letter # Subject 1 CRA Comments (5/20/04)

  8. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    February 15, 2013 Agency/ Sub- agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/GC N/A Request for information on reducing regulatory burden DOE is continually engaging in review of its rules to determine whether there are burdens on the public that can be

  9. OMB Burden Disclosure Statement

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    71.1 OMB Control Number (09/2012) (Classification) OMB Burden Disclosure Statement 1910-1800 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 (minutes) per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching exist ing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comme nts regarding this estimate or any other aspect of this information, including suggestions for

  10. From: Jane Wilsdorf To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comment

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Jane Wilsdorf To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comment Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 9:37:00 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  11. From: Cutting, John To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Cutting, John To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David Cc: Buechler, John; Duffy, Timothy; Patka, Carl; Regulatory Affairs Subject: NYISO comments re: draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:29:46 PM Attachments: 20141020_NYISO_Comments_DOE_Congestion_Study.pdf Please find attached above the comments of the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. regarding the draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. John C. Cutting Regulatory

  12. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Input US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input. Comments relevant to the following two sections of the...

  13. Support for City of Alexandria's Comments on the District of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Commission Re: District of Columbia Public Service Commission Emergency ... Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Comments on Department of Energy's ...

  14. Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Solutions Honeywell comment on regulatory policy issues that need to be considered, and on implementation challenges and opportunities critical to deploying Smart Grid systems. ...

  15. DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI January 4.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  16. Power North America RFI Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    North America RFI Comments Power North America RFI Comments Power North America RFI Comments: Under most regulatory rules and policies in the U.S., utilities are incentivized to making the lowest cost investment which yields the highest return in the case of shareowner companies, the least immediate rate impacts for municipal utilities and the longest potential payback for rural electric coops. PDF icon Power North America RFI Comments More Documents & Publications Browning: Email in

  17. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2009) Customer Comments on 2009 PTSA Avista Utilities BPA Power Services Grant County PUD Horizon Wind Energy Iberdrola Renewables Northwest Requirements Utilities Powerex...

  18. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Service Customer Comments Customer Response to July 24August 8 Forums N.Wasco County PUD (08262013) Portland General Electric (08262013) Renewable Northwest Project (0826...

  19. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Customer Comments BPA Power (452012) Clark PUD (452012) Cowlitz PUD (452012) Emerald PUD (452012) Franklin PUD (452012) Grant PUD (452012) Iberdrola (452012)...

  20. Fireplace pictures | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    pictures Fireplace pictures pictures of fireplaces PDF icon Fireplace pictures More Documents & Publications Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Regulatory Burden RFI from HPBA Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments)

  1. Picture | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Picture Picture Picture of a fireplace PDF icon Picture More Documents & Publications Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Regulatory Burden RFI from HPBA Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments)

  2. Cohen_DoE comments

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Claude R. Canizares Vice President for Research and Associate Provost Bruno Rossi Professor of Physics 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 3-234 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307 Phone 617-253-3206 Fax 617-253-3193 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY March 18, 2011 Mr. Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency US Department of Energy Office of General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington DC 20585 SUBEJCT: Reducing Regulatory Burden - EO

  3. Regulatory Compliance

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Mountain projects. All technical work that will support the regulatory decision, from data collection to performance assessment analysis, is conducted under stringent quality...

  4. Page comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    with-serial-codes-on-login-nodesPageComment101 http:www.nersc.govuserssoftwarecompilersintel-fortran-c-and-cintel-bug-reportsintel-uses-very-old-version-of-libstdc-by-de...

  5. COMMENTS | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    COMMENTS� COMMENTS� PDF icon COMMENTS� More Documents & Publications COMMENTS� CHAPTER 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Microsoft Word - Appendix A_2006_Jun

  6. QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 6 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6 QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 6 From: Hallie Kennan [hallie@energyinnovation.org] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:37 PM To: QERcomments CC: Sonia Aggarwal Subject: Comment on the QER Public Meeting in Atlanta, GA: Business/Economic Development Attachment: APP-UTILITIES.pdf; SPSC-CREPC_NewRegulatoryModels.pdf Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on finance and market incentives. Thank you, Hallie

  7. QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 7 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7 QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 7 From: Hallie Kennan [hallie@energyinnovation.org] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:41 PM To: QERcomments CC: Sonia Aggarwal Subject: RE: Comment on the QER Public Meeting in Atlanta, GA: Business/Economic Development Attachment: APP-UTILITIES.pdf; SPSC-CREPC_NewRegulatoryModels.pdf Apologies. Please accept these papers as comments for the QER public meeting on business/economic development.

  8. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation To provide greater transparency to the Department of Energy's (DOE) cleanup of nuclear legacy waste, DOE made the "West Valley Demonstration Project Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the Vitrification Melter" (Draft WIR Evaluation) available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory

  9. From: Ashley Foreman To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Ashley Foreman To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comment Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:49:46 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  10. From: Carol Munson Ross To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Munson Ross To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: comment Date: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:17:16 PM To Whom It May Concern, I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private

  11. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Download | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Download Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Download PDF icon Attachment-1-1-Non-Retaliation-Policy-Internal.pdf PDF icon ONO-SBA-Report-to-Congress-2014.pdf More Documents & Publications The Role of Ombudsmen in Dispute Resolution Human Capital: The Role of Ombudsmen in Dispute Resolution Microsoft Word - Cover Letter Regulatory Burden RFI 4-15-11

  12. Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Implementing Smart Grid Solutions | Department of Energy Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy and Logistical Challenges in Implementing Smart Grid Solutions Honeywell comment on regulatory policy issues that need to be considered, and on implementation challenges and opportunities critical to deploying Smart Grid systems. PDF icon Initial Comments of Honeywell, Inc. on Policy

  13. U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) The National Propane Gas Association (NPGA) offers the following reply comments in response to the...

  14. COMMENTS | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    COMMENTS� COMMENTS� PDF icon COMMENTS� More Documents & Publications CHAPTER 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc

  15. Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework DOE's Nuclear Safety Enabling Legislation Regulatory Enforcement & Oversight Regulatory Governance Atomic Energy Act 1946 ...

  16. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE EO 13563 December 2012...

  17. QER- Comment of Tate Sullivan

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Are any of the presentations or comments during this public meeting going to be released in electronic form? Have they been released? Is there a replay available of the event? Thank you. Tate Sullivan, CFA CLSA Americas, LLC Vice President CLSA is committed to reducing consumption for a better environment and is ISO14001 certified. The content of this communication is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.

  18. QER - Comment of Khamsune Vongkhamchanh 1 | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    VONGKHAMCHANH, KHAMSUNE [KVONGKH@entergy.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:59 PM To: QERcomments Subject: QER Public Meeting: Petroleum Product Transmission & Distribution I attended the subject meeting on 5/27. I apologize for not jotting the information down, but by when are comments requested to be submitted? Thanks. Kham Vongkhamchanh Transmission Regulatory Support Entergy Services, Inc. (504) 576-2097 More Documents & Publications QER - Comment of Khamsune Vongkhamchanh 2 QER -

  19. QER- Comment of Tate Sullivan

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you. From: QERcomments [mailto:QERcomments@Hq.Doe.Gov] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 4:14 PM To: Tate Sullivan, CLSA Subject: RE: QER Public Meeting: Petroleum Product Transmission & Distribution Tate, You can find the panelists' statements and other information, including a link to a video of meetings when available, at www.energy.gov/qer. We will post transcripts for all meetings, which will include the facilitated discussion and any public comments given during the open mic, on the same website in the weeks following each meeting. All comments we receive through this email will eventually become public, but not until later this fall. Regards, Karen Karen G. Wayland, Ph.D. Deputy Director for State, Local and Tribal Cooperation Energy Policy and Systems Analysis U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20585 From: Tate Sullivan, CLSA Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:47 AM To: QERcomments Subject: QER Public Meeting: Petroleum Product Transmission & Distribution Are any of the presentations or comments during this public meeting going to be released in electronic form? Have they been released? Is there a replay available of the event? Thank you. Tate Sullivan, CFA CLSA Americas, LLC Vice President CLSA is committed to reducing consumption for a better environment and is ISO14001 certified. The content of this communication is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is committed to reducing consumption for a better environment and is ISO14001 certified. The content of this communication is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.

  20. Cover Letter for Motion to Intervene and Comments of the District of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Columbia Government | Department of Energy Cover Letter for Motion to Intervene and Comments of the District of Columbia Government Cover Letter for Motion to Intervene and Comments of the District of Columbia Government Docket No. EO-05-01: Cover letter for Motion to Intervene and Comments of the District of Columbia Government, being filed today with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and served upon all parties designated on the official service list, in Docket No. EL05-145-000

  1. Microsoft Word - Honeywell comments_DOE RFI_Smart Grid Policy and Logistical Challenges.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOE RFI on Smart Grid Honeywell Inc. 1 INITIAL COMMENTS OF HONEYWELL, INC. ON POLICY AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING SMART GRID SOLUTIONS Pursuant to DOE's September 17, 2010 request, Honeywell, Inc. ("Honeywell") respectfully submits these comments on policy and logistical challenges and potential solutions for implementing Smart Grid solutions. Honeywell appreciates the opportunity to comment on regulatory policy issues that need to be considered, and on implementation

  2. Comment Period Closed Explained

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The public comment period on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has ended, and DOE is preparing a Final EIS. The Final EIS will consider and respond to all timely public comments on the...

  3. Fireplace photo | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    photo Fireplace photo Photo of a fireplace. PDF icon Fireplace photo More Documents & Publications .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) Re: Regulatory Burden RFI

  4. QER- Comment of WIRES

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the components of WIRES Comment to the QER. Please direct any questions to Jim Hoecker, below.

  5. TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PurposeThis procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process.

  6. Submitting Comments via Email

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Submitting Comments via Email Any contact information provided in your e-mail submission will not be publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). Your contact information will be publicly viewable if you include it in the comment itself or in any documents attached to your comment. Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to

  7. From: Stolar, Olena To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: NextEra Energy Inc."s Comments on the DOE Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study submitted

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Stolar, Olena To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: NextEra Energy Inc."s Comments on the DOE Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study submitted on behalf of Joseph T. Kelliher Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 4:31:02 PM Attachments: NEI DOE Congestion Study Comments 10-20-2014-FINAL.pdf Attached please find NextEra Energy Inc.'s Comments on the DOE Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study submitted on behalf of Joseph T. Kelliher. Olena Stolar Federal Regulatory

  8. From: Angie Smith To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Please Read

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Angie Smith To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Please Read Date: Sunday, September 21, 2014 1:24:58 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  9. From: Cameron Foreman To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Cameron Foreman To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Nietc Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:31:04 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  10. From: Curt Jacobs To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Curt Jacobs To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors Date: Friday, October 03, 2014 8:51:55 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. -First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the line. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer.

  11. From: David Newacheck To: Congestion Study Comments Date:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Newacheck To: Congestion Study Comments Date: Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:15:20 PM Dear Sir or Ma'am; I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons: First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for transmission

  12. From: David Schaefer To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Schaefer To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Oppose Date: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 9:46:21 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for transmission

  13. From: Deb Long To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Deb Long To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Transmission lines Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 7:41:57 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  14. From: Diane Ragsdale To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Diane Ragsdale To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Please consider the attached letter for the US Dept of Energy Congestion Study 2014. Thank you, Diane Ragsdale, Moberly, Missouri Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 8:55:21 AM September 19, 2014 Dear United States Department of Energy, In regard to the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study, I am strongly opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors. The easements would place a burden on landowners on

  15. From: Ed Doughty To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Ed Doughty To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Opposed to NIETC"s Date: Friday, October 03, 2014 5:00:09 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  16. From: Eric Lovelace To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Eric Lovelace To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Opposition to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC"s) Date: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 6:25:37 PM Dear Sir or Madam: I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible

  17. From: Joyce Crommett To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Crommett To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Private property rights Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:35:50 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property

  18. From: Joyce Wortmann To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Wortmann To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Energy Transmission Corridors Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 7:03:18 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private

  19. From: Justin Imhof To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Justin Imhof To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Opposed to NIETC Date: Sunday, October 12, 2014 6:37:21 PM To whom it may concern, I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning

  20. From: Kay Foreman To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: NIETC

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Kay Foreman To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: NIETC Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:05:03 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for transmission

  1. From: Luke Lowenstein To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Luke Lowenstein To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: GrainBelt Express Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 10:48:56 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property

  2. From: MCKEOWN D To: Congestion Study Comments Date:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    MCKEOWN D To: Congestion Study Comments Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 2:18:11 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for transmission lines in one state

  3. From: Marcie Christensen To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Marcie Christensen To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Transmission Corridors Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 4:14:26 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private

  4. From: Peter Schumann To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Peter Schumann To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 5:24:51 PM We are opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, we believe

  5. From: Rod Gore To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Rod Gore To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Opposition to NIETC"s Date: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:12:24 AM My family and I are vehemently opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden and decreased property values on landowners on and near the line. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer.

  6. From: Roseanne Meyer To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Roseanne Meyer To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: NIETC Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 10:33:57 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  7. From: THERESA KELLOGG To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    THERESA KELLOGG To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: National Interest Energy Transmissions Corridors Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:35:40 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that

  8. From: Talley, Carrie To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Talley, Carrie To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Transmission Line Congestion study Date: Monday, October 13, 2014 2:00:04 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undue burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning

  9. From: Wayne Beach To: Congestion Study Comments Date:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Wayne Beach To: Congestion Study Comments Date: Thursday, October 09, 2014 12:32:40 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for transmission lines in one

  10. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18,

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    2012 | Department of Energy - December 18, 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE EO 13563 December 2012 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts PDF icon 13563_and_ICR_ Rpt_12_18_12.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE 13563 and ICR Report

  11. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 2014 FINAL More Documents & Publications DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013

  12. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Grid Implementation Input | Department of Energy US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Input to DOE Request for Information Smart Grid Implementation Input. Comments relevant to the following two sections of the RFI: "Long Term Issues: Managing a Grid with High Penetration of New

  13. CRA Comments & Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (51105) 11 Response to CRA Comments (92005) Enclosure 1 - Computer Code VerificationTesting (92005) Inventory and Performance Assessment Reports DOE - Performance...

  14. Reliability Question Comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Reliability-Question-Comment Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives...

  15. Appendix C - Comments and Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    according to comment categories. In compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and Council on Environmental Quality regulations, public comments on...

  16. QER- Comment of Philip Saunders

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Sir/Madam: Please oppose the Northeast Expansion of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline. For reasons having to do with climate change, which I don't need to explain to you, it is not in our interest to be enabling further carbon combustion here or anywhere else in the world. Natural gas is not needed in Mass. as a "bridge" fuel. Mass. is making good progress toward lowering CO2 emissions, and with continued declines in the cost of photovoltaic installations, changes in net meter regulations, and expansion of offshore wind power, Mass. can produce enough renewable energy to replace the electric power lost from the closure of coal-fired plants. To the extent that gas through the proposed pipeline will be exported, I see no reason for Mass. to bear the burden of providing natural gas to China and others. The pipeline would inevitably go through wetlands, conservation land, land trust land, and agriculturally restricted land, which owners, donors, and taxpayers have gone to great lengths and expense over the generations to protect. All of this would be undone and wasted, merely so Kinder Morgan could increase its bottom line. We'd be paying the price and they would be reaping the profit. Federal approvals for the project should be withheld. Thank you for allowing me to comment. Very truly yours, Philip Saunders, Jr., Ph.D. ___________________________ PHILIP SAUNDERS ASSOCIATES Economic and Financial Analysis

  17. Environmental Regulatory Framework

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Regulatory Framework Environmental Regulatory Framework Completing buildings and projects while protecting the environment August 1, 2013 Environmental Regulatory Framework Environmental regulatory framework for Los Alamos National Laboratory View larger image » LANL complies with a comprehensive set of regulations. Every new building or project at LANL must go through a rigorous evaluation of potential environmental impacts. The Permits Requirements Identification (PRID) system is a project

  18. Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework DOE's Nuclear Safety Enabling Legislation Regulatory Enforcement & Oversight Regulatory Governance Atomic Energy Act 1946 Atomic Energy Act 1954 Energy Reorganization Act 1974 DOE Act 1977 Authority and responsibility to regulate nuclear safety at DOE facilities 10 CFR 830 10 CFR 835 10 CFR 820 Regulatory Implementation Nuclear Safety Radiological Safety Procedural Rules ISMS-QA; Operating Experience; Metrics and Analysis Cross Cutting

  19. Operating experience with 100% pellet burden on Amanda blast furnace

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Keaton, D.E.; Minakawa, T. . Ironmaking Dept.)

    1993-01-01

    A number of significant changes in operations at the Ashland Works of the Armco Steel Company occurred in 1992 which directly impacted the Amanda Blast Furnace operation. These changes included the shutdown of the hot strip mill which resulted in coke oven gas enrichment of the Amanda stoves and an increase of 75 C in hot blast temperature, transition to 100% continuous cast operation which resulted in increased variation of the hot metal demand, and the July idling of the sinter plant. Historically, the Amanda Blast Furnace burden was 30% fluxed sinter and 70% acid pellet. It was anticipated that the change to 100% pellet burden would require changes in charging practice and alter furnace performance. The paper gives a general furnace description and then describes the burden characteristics, operating practice with 30% sinter/70% acid pellet burden, preparations for the 100% acid pellet burden operation, the 100% acid pellet operation, and the 100% fluxed pellet burden operation.

  20. Final Letter to DOE Regulatory Burden 9_7_2012.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE STEVE NARDELLA President (Winchester Homes Inc.) RICK BAILEY Vice President/Calvert Co. (Marrick Properties) DOUG MEEKER Vice President/Charles Co. (Elm Street Development) ROBERT J. SPALDING Vice President/Mont. Co. (Miller & Smith Homes) HILLARY P.COLT Vice President/Prince George's Co. (Konterra) MIKE MUMMAUGH Vice President/St. Mary's Co. (Paragon Properties Inc.) BRIAN "A.J." JACKSON Vice President/Washington DC (EYA, LLC) FRANK BOSSONG, IV, P.E Associate

  1. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the

  2. Comments on Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    envelope by incorporating a proven NEPA compliance methodology already used effectively in a segment of DOE. The methodology is formed around a policy-level Environmental Impact ...

  3. Comments from The National Association of Regulatory Utility...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid; Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy, 75 Federal Register 33611 (June 14, 2010). "Cybersecurity for State Regulators" - NARUC ...

  4. Dairyland Power Cooperative comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    comments Dairyland Power Cooperative comments Response comments from Dairyland Power Cooperative on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logisitical Reliability PDF icon...

  5. Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures In response to an application, any person may file a protest, comments, or a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as...

  6. Alternative future environmental regulatory approaches for petroleum refineries.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Elcock, D.; Gasper, J.; Moses, D. O.; Emerson, D.; Arguerro, R.; Environmental Assessment; DOE; Analytical Services, Inc.

    2000-01-01

    Recently, many industrial, regulatory, and community leaders have expressed concern that the current environmental regulatory structure disregards multimedia environmental impacts, provides few incentives to develop and use new technologies, and fails to consider site-specific conditions. For the US petroleum refining industry, faced with the need to produce higher-quality fuels from poorer-quality feedstocks, such criticisms are expected to increase. This article offers two alternative environmental regulatory approaches for existing petroleum refineries to use in the future. These alternative approaches are multimedia in scope, provide for new technology development and use, and allow flexibility in the means for meeting environmental goals. They have been reviewed and critiqued by various stakeholders, including industry representatives, regulators, and local and national community and environmental organizations. The integration of stakeholder comments and findings of ongoing national and international regulatory reinvention efforts in the development of these approaches positions them for potential use by other industries in addition to petroleum refineries.

  7. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service Comm'n ) ) POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S MOTION TO INTERVENE AND COMMENT IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY PETITION AND COMPLAINT Pursuant to Rules 211 and 214 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or the "Commission"), 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.211 and 385.214 (2004), Potomac Electric Power Company

  8. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Emergency Petition and Complaint of ) Docket No. EL05-145-000 District of Columbia Public Service Comm'n ) ) POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER AND ANSWER TO COMMENTS AND PROTESTS Pursuant to Rules 212 and 213 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or the "Commission"), 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.212 and 385.213 (2005), Potomac Electric Power Company ("Pepco")

  9. Comments of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council FE Docket No. 99-1 |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy the Northeast Power Coordinating Council FE Docket No. 99-1 Comments of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council FE Docket No. 99-1 On July 21, 1999 the Department of Energy, hereinafter "DOE" or the "Department" issued its Notice of Proposed Amendment to the Predidential Permits and Export Authorizations and Delegation and Assignment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. PDF icon Comments of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council FE Docket

  10. Public Comment Opportunities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Comments on the Draft EIS and Presidential permit can be submitted verbally during public hearings or in writing to Dr. Julie A Smith at: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE...

  11. OSTIblog Recent comments

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    of Energy (DOE) for the scientific contributor and also for Petroleum Engineering

    Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:20:00 +0000 comment 1254 at http:www.osti.govhome Microscope repair...

  12. EA and SOWP Comments

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    EA and SOWP Comments This document covers Knight Piisold's technical comments to the Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site (EA) and the Shiprock Site Observational Work Plan (SOWP). The major areas of concern include the following: 1. The contaminant sources on site may not be properly defined. In particular, the disposal cell and the residual vadose zone soil contamination need to be redefined in the conceptual model and the transport

  13. Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Katherine Young National Renewable Energy Laboratory Track: ... Objectives * To develop the permitting roadmap for geothermal power projects at the ...

  14. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Corporation Docket No. PF14-21-000 BP Alaska LNG, LLC Conoco Phillips Alaska LNG Company ExxonMobil Alaska LNG, LLC TransCanada Alaska Midstream, LP NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PLANNED ALASKA LNG PROJECT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES (March 4, 2015) The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) that will discuss the environmental impacts of the Alaska LNG

  15. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Port Arthur LNG, LLC and Docket Nos. PF15-18-000 and Port Arthur Pipeline, LLC PF15-19-000 NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PLANNED PORT ARTHUR LIQUEFACTION PROJECT AND PORT ARTHUR PIPELINE PROJECT, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES, AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETINGS (June 24, 2015) The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) that will discuss the environmental

  16. West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation West Valley Seeks Comment on Draft Waste Evaluation June 29, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Bryan Bower 716-942-4368 Bill Taylor bill.taylor@srs.gov 803-952-8564 West Valley, NY - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today released to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the public and the states of Nevada and Texas, and the Seneca Nation of Indians for review and comment, a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the

  17. Implementation of subsidence control regulatory requirements

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Barkley, D.

    1999-07-01

    Underground coal mining in Illinois has shown an increasing percentage of total coal mined relative to surface mining. In the past 20 years, the percentage of underground to surface mine production has steadily increased. Underground mining is expected to continue to dominate Illinois coal production into the 21st century. The drive for higher production and lower operating costs should increase the number of longwall and high extraction retreat mines. This will be achieved through conversion of existing room and pillar mines or initiation of new underground mining operations. The environmental regulations that govern the mitigation of surface impacts have evolved at both the state and federal level. Federal regulations passed in 1995 modifying the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act mandated additional restrictions and regulatory requirements beyond those adopted in 1977. State regulatory bodies that implement the regulations are now working to bring their regulations and procedures into compliance with the oversight federal counterpart. many states have raised concerns over the practical application of certain aspects of the new permitting requirements. This paper describes past and present subsidence regulations in Illinois, their impact on the coal industry and on the landowners above underground coal mining. Potential problems in implementation of the new regulatory requirements as well as additional burdens placed on coal companies to comply with the regulations are explored.

  18. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory and Licensing Matters GC-52 provides legal advice to DOE regarding Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulatory and licensing matters of interest to DOE, either as an NRC license applicant or in connection with related authorities and responsibilities of DOE and NRC on nuclear material, nuclear waste, and nuclear nonproliferation matters. GC-52 attorneys provide advice and support on a

  19. QER- Comment of Diane Cray

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good afternoon, Would it be possible to get a list of presenters and their written comments on meeting agenda?

  20. QER- Comment of Xcel Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are the comments of Xcel Energy Services Inc. Please let me know if you have any questions.

  1. Phenylpropanoid related regulatory protein-regulatory region associations

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Apuya, Nestor; Bobzin, Steven Craig; Park, Joon-Hyun; Doukhanina, Elena

    2012-01-03

    Materials and methods for identifying lignin regulatory region-regulatory protein associations are disclosed. Materials and methods for modulating lignin accumulation are also disclosed.

  2. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    July 29, 2013 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 PDF icon DOE 13563 and ICR Report - Final.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE EO 13563...

  3. From: Carl Daffron To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Carl Daffron To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 12:47:15 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undue burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that

  4. From: Carol Johnson To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Re: National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Johnson To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Re: National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors Date: Sunday, October 19, 2014 8:20:41 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. I am a landowner in the path

  5. From: Hope Albright To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Block Grain Belt

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Hope Albright To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Block Grain Belt Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:52:07 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  6. From: Jessi O"Bannon To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Jessi O"Bannon To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: I Oppse NIETC"s Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 10:56:37 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private

  7. From: Kamra To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: NIETC"s Date:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Kamra To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: NIETC"s Date: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 6:59:27 PM To Whom It May concern: I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private

  8. From: Kathy Mikels To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: STOP CLEAN LINE, BLOCK GRAIN BELT

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Kathy Mikels To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: STOP CLEAN LINE, BLOCK GRAIN BELT Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:33:53 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning

  9. From: No Towers To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: No NIETC"s

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    No Towers To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: No NIETC"s Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:58:10 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  10. From: Noralie Crow To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC)

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Noralie Crow To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC) Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 6:50:56 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe

  11. CenterPoint Comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    CenterPoint Comments CenterPoint Comments CenterPoint Comments on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges PDF icon CenterPoint Comments More Documents & Publications City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI:

  12. FERC hears gas industry concerns, announces Transco settlement. [Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rodgers, L.M.

    1991-07-01

    This article examines the industry comments on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) notice of proposed rulemaking on natural gas pipeline function and comparability of service and the resolution of a charge of violations of regulations against the Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation by the FERC's Office of the General Council.

  13. QTR - unedited comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    - unedited comments QTR - unedited comments PDF icon Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information More Documents & Publications Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI QTR table of respondents

  14. Career Map: Regulatory Expert | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Expert Career Map: Regulatory Expert A regulatory expert works on a computer with two screens while reading from a book. Regulatory Expert Position Title Regulatory Expert Alternate Title(s) Government Regulatory Expert, Utility Regulatory Expert, Policy & Regulatory Specialist, Policy Analyst, Public Affairs, Legislative Liaison, Government Relations, Government Affairs, Lobbyist Education & Training Level Advanced, Bachelors required, prefer graduate degree Education &

  15. Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1, Calculation of Annual Doses To Man From Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents For The Purpose of Evaluating Compliance With 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Revision 1* October 1977 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT REGULATORY GUIDE 1. 09 CALCULATION OF ANNUAL DOSES TO MAN- FROM ROUTINE RELEASES OF REACTOR EFFLUENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVALUATING COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR PART 50, APPENDIX I ' USNRC REGULATORY GUIDES Comments should be sent to the Secretary of the Commission. U.S. Nuclear Regu- Regulatoey Guides are issued to describe nd make available to th Public methods latory Commission. Washington,

  16. Comments/Questions | Critical Materials Institute

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comments/Questions To offer comments on the CMI website or to ask questions, please contact us: CMIdirector@ameslab.gov 515-296-4500 or use this web form for comments. Thanks!

  17. Comments - Change package

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Card comments on the Change packages: 1)Overriding assumptions that the amount of work is finite - such as: - Finite # of dollars available - Finite # of highly trained contract workers - Finite amount of contaminated groundwater - Permits with finite terms -Secondary assumption that work can be characterized and prioritized - What appears to be infinite is the time available to mitigate the problem. No way to realistically estimate how long mitigation will take. The decision making process

  18. web_comments.xls

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Date Rec Type Recommendations/ Comments Name Organization 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Future reliability standards must strike a balance between detailed, rigid requirements, which provide little or no latitude for deviation, and standards, which are objective-based and allow for innovation and invention to achieve intended goals. Each standard should identify its importance on the BPS reliability in terms of the potential short-term (operating time horizon) vs. long-term (planning time

  19. DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report January 2014 PDF icon DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report January 2014 FINAL More Documents & Publications DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Re

  20. Microsoft Word - CLWR scoping Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be...

  1. QER- Comment of Bridger LLC

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attn: Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Task Force: Please find attached written comments by Bridger LLC for the Quadrennial Energy Review Report.

  2. QER- Comment of Elaine Mroz

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Elaine Mroz Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on the Public Meetings Infrastructure Restraints- New England held April 21, 2014, in Providence, RI and Hartford, CT. Please see attached file.

  3. Summary of comments received from workshops on radiological criteria for decommissioning

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Caplin, J.; Page, G.; Smith, D.; Wiblin, C.

    1994-01-01

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is conducting an enhanced participatory rulemaking to establish radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning of NRC-licensed facilities. Open public meetings were held during 1993 in Chicago, IL, San Francisco, CA, Boston, MA, Dallas, TX, Philadelphia, PA, Atlanta, GA, and Washington, DC. Interested parties were invited to provide input on the rulemaking issues before the NRC staff develops a draft proposed rule. This report summarizes 3,635 comments categorized from transcripts of the seven workshops and 1,677 comments from 100 NRC docketed letters from individuals and organizations. No analysis or response to the comments is included. The comments reflect a broad spectrum of viewpoints on the issues related to radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning. The NRC also held public meetings on the scope of the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) during July 1993. The GEIS meetings were held in Washington, DC., San Francisco, CA, Oklahoma City, OK, and Cleveland, OH. Related comments from these meetings were reviewed and comments which differed substantially from those from the workshops are also summarized in the body of the report. A summary of the comments from the GEIS scoping meetings is included as an Appendix.

  4. EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2011-11-21

    The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Vehicle Technologies Program manages several transportation regulatory activities established by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct), as amended by the Energy Conservation Reauthorization Act of 1998, EPAct 2005, and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA).

  5. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Register: December 21, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 244)] [Proposed Rules] [Page 71331-71333] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr21de99-21] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Parts 71 and 73 RIN 3150-AG41 Advance Notification to Native American Tribes of Transportation of Certain Types of Nuclear Waste AGENCY:

  6. QER- Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting “Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency,” Held April 11, 2014, - Please provide link to where public comments are available.

  7. Comments of consumer electronics association | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    consumer electronics association Comments of consumer electronics association The Consumer Electronics Association ("CEA") respectfully submits these comments in response to the ...

  8. QER- Comment of Dakota Resource Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are comments from the Dakota Resource Council, a membership-based organization of North Dakotans. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Infrastructure Constraints.

  9. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy July 2015 EO 12866 Report FINAL More Documents & Publications Department of Energy Retrospective Plan Update as of February 2015 DOE Retrospective Review Report as of March 2016 DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts

  10. regulatory | OpenEI Community

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    regulatory Home Graham7781's picture Submitted by Graham7781(2017) Super contributor 5 August, 2013 - 13:18 Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap featured on NREL Now geothermal NREL...

  11. QER- Comment of Michael Kirkwood

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please accept the attached comments from Pascoag Utility District regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review process. Out comments focus on the difficulty with our current RTO market structure and its lack of providing appropriate cost-effective solutions to our energy infrastructure needs in New England.

  12. Nuclear Regulatory Commission information digest

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    None,

    1990-03-01

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission information digest provides summary information regarding the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, its regulatory responsibilities, and areas licensed by the commission. This is an annual publication for the general use of the NRC Staff and is available to the public. The digest is divided into two parts: the first presents an overview of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the second provides data on NRC commercial nuclear reactor licensees and commercial nuclear power reactors worldwide.

  13. Regulatory Requirements | The Ames Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Regulatory Requirements Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environment, Energy, and Transportation Management (January 26, 2007) and Executive Order 13514, Federal...

  14. Washington Coastal Zone Management Regulatory Handbook | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Washington Coastal Zone Management Regulatory HandbookPermittingRegulatory GuidanceGuideHandbook Author Washington...

  15. From: Katie McKay To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Opposition to National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Katie McKay To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Opposition to National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:09:23 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undue burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I

  16. QER- Comment of Governors' Wind Energy Coalition

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the Governors' Wind Energy Coalition's comments on the QER. Thank you. Larry Pearce

  17. DOE - BCS TSD comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    - BCS TSD comments DOE - BCS TSD comments PowerPoint slides presenting AHAM and PTI comments on technical support document. PDF icon DOE - BCS TSD comments More Documents & Publications Ex Parte Meeting with DOE and Navigant Consulting on Battery Charger Energy Fact Sheet: Lithium-Ion Batteries for Stationary Energy Storage (October 2012) EV Everywhere Batteries Workshop - Beyond Lithium Ion Breakout Session Report

  18. Tribal Comments Database | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments Database Tribal Comments Database Summary of all comments from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtables held between March 16 and April 14, 2011. PDF icon TribalEnergyRoundtable_CommentsDatabase.pdf More Documents & Publications 1. INTRODUCTION Tribal Roundable Executive Summary Pala Roundtable Summary

  19. QER- Comment of Northeast Gas Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find enclosed comments of the Northeast Gas Association regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review. Thank you.

  20. Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment in Support

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Emergency Petition and Complaint | Department of Energy to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and Complaint Potomac Electric Power Company's Motion to Intervene and Comment in Support of Emergency Petition and Complaint Docket No. EO-05-01. Docket No. EL05-145-000: Pursuant to Rules 211 and 214 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or the "Commission"), 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.211 and 385.214 (2004),

  1. Motion to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia Motion to Intervene and Comments of the City of Alexandria, Virginia Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Section 214 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's ("Commission") Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.214, and the Notice of Filing issued in this proceeding on August 25, 2005, the City of Alexandria, Virginia ("Alexandria") moves to intervene and provides the

  2. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    July 29, 2013 Agency/ Sub- agency RIN/ OMB Contro l Numb er Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completio n Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/EE 1904- AB57 Proposed Energy Conservation Standards for Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies DOE proposed amended energy conservation standards for Class A EPSs and new

  3. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    January 2014 Agency/ Sub- agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/EE 1904- AB57 Energy Conservation Standards for Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies DOE is considering amended energy conservation standards for Class A EPSs and new energy

  4. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    August 2014 Newly Added Actions Agency/ Sub-agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/OE N/A Export of Electricity & Permitting of Electricity Transmission Facilities at International Boundaries; New Administrative Procedures; Proposed Rule DOE is

  5. Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    to October 31, 2013. Comments received are available below. PDF icon Comments from Lee Cunningham, sent September 23, 2013 PDF icon Comments from Patrick Ledger of Arizona's...

  6. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Dr. Contreras ...

  7. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from Marshall Hughes Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Marshall Hughes Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Marshall ...

  8. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. Comment from Lewis Cain 6-8-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

  9. EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Comment Period EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period Klondike IIIBiglow Canyon Wind Integration Project This notice extends the close of comment for scoping from the...

  10. Reply Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Verizon and Verizon Wireless More Documents & Publications Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc....

  11. Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx PDF icon Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx More Documents & Publications...

  12. Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May...

  13. Microsoft Word - CLWR scoping Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be received on or before November 14, 2011. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be faxed to: Mr. Curtis Chambellan Mr. Curtis Chambellan CLWR SEIS Document Manager (505) 845-5872 U.S. DOE/NNSA Box 5400 or sent by electronic mail to: Albuquerque, NM 87185-5400

  14. Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Webinar May 23, 2012 | Department of Energy Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects PDF icon regulatory_considerations_052312.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 Regulatory

  15. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy July 29, 2013 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 PDF icon DOE 13563 and ICR Report - Final.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE 13563 and ICR Report DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012

  16. QER- Comment of Emily Crowell

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    One of the Senator’s constituents dropped off comments that she wanted to pass along to your office re: the QER public meeting. For your records her contact information is below:

  17. Comment and Response Management System

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    1998-06-09

    CRMS is a Web-based client/server application that helps manage, track, and report on institutional responses to public comments on published documents such as environmental impact statements.

  18. Scoping Comment Summary 092412.docx

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Scoping Comment Summary for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, and Tennessee Valley Authority Since announcement of the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SPD Supplemental EIS), DOE has provided three opportunities for the public to provide scoping comments (2007 [72 FR 14543]; 2010 [75 FR 41850]; and 2012 [77 FR 1920]). The public scoping

  19. Regulatory Processes | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Appliance & Equipment Standards » Rulemakings & Notices » Regulatory Processes Regulatory Processes Beginning with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, Congress has enacted a series of laws establishing federal appliance and equipment standards and the Department of Energy's (DOE) authority to develop, amend, and implement standards. To implement these laws, the Appliance and Equipment Standards program manages the regulatory processes described below. Standards Development

  20. Regulatory Compliance | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. The Department of Energy is not a regulatory agency; however it does self-regulate its own radioactive waste. DOE is also affected by a variety of statutes, legislation,

  1. Regulatory Processes | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Processes Regulatory Processes Beginning with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, Congress has enacted a series of laws establishing federal appliance and equipment standards and the Department of Energy's (DOE) authority to develop, amend, and implement standards. To implement these laws, the Appliance and Equipment Standards program manages the regulatory processes described below. Standards Development and Revision Standards for a given product may be mandated by

  2. Regulatory Streamlining and Improvement

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mark A. Carl

    2006-07-11

    The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC) engaged in numerous projects outlined under the scope of work discussed in the United States Department of Energy (DOE) grant number DE-FC26-04NT15456 awarded to the IOGCC. Numerous projects were completed that were extremely valuable to state oil and gas agencies as a result of work performed utilizing resources provided by the grant. There are numerous areas in which state agencies still need assistance. This additional assistance will need to be addressed under future scopes of work submitted annually to DOE's Project Officer for this grant. This report discusses the progress of the projects outlined under the grant scope of work for the 2005-2006 areas of interest, which are as follows: Area of Interest No. 1--Regulatory Streamlining and Improvement: This area of interest continues to support IOGCC's regulatory streamlining efforts that include the identification and elimination of unnecessary duplications of efforts between and among state and federal programs dealing with exploration and production on public lands. Area of Interest No. 2--Technology: This area of interest seeks to improve efficiency in states through the identification of technologies that can reduce costs. Area of Interest No. 3--Training and Education: This area of interest is vital to upgrading the skills of regulators and industry alike. Within the National Energy Policy, there are many appropriate training and education opportunities. Education was strongly endorsed by the President's National Energy Policy Development group. Acting through the governors offices, states are very effective conduits for the dissemination of energy education information. While the IOGCC favors the development of a comprehensive, long-term energy education plan, states are also supportive of immediate action on important concerns, such as energy prices, availability and conservation. Area of Interest No. 4--Resource Assessment and Development: This area of interest relates directly to helping maximize production of domestic oil and natural gas resources, including areas that are under explored or have not been adequately defined.

  3. Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Webinar May 23, 2012 | Department of Energy Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 Document covers the Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects. PDF icon regulatory_considerations_052312.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 Regulatory Considerations for

  4. Microsoft Word - CLWR Draft SEIS Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Curtis Chambellan tritium.readiness.seis@doeal.gov CLWR SEIS Document Manager U.S. DOENNSA...

  5. QER- Comment of Berkshire Environmental Action Team

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear members of the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force, Please find attached comments from the Berkshire Environmental Action Team, Inc. (BEAT) regarding the proposed natural gas pipeline expansion. Thank you for considering our comments.

  6. Comments/Questions? | The Ames Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comments/Questions? Name (optional): Email Address (optional): Comment/Question: * CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Submit

  7. Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Dockets Open for Public Comment A list of current dockets open for public comment can be found on at this web page here. FILINGS: Filings may be submitted using one of the ...

  8. QER- Comment of Geotherman Energy Association (GEA)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hi the Geothermal Energy Association would like to submit the attached comments for the 2014 QER process. Thanks,

  9. QER- Comment of National Resource Defense Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please accept this paper as a comment into the QER record on siting energy and transmission resources.

  10. Comments on backreaction and cosmic acceleration

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kolb, Edward W.; Matarrese, Sabinio; Riotto, Antonion; /CERN

    2005-11-01

    In this brief WEB note we comment on recent papers related to our paper ''On Acceleration Without Dark Energy''.

  11. Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Below are links to DOE NEPA projects with open comment periods, including comment periods on the proposed scope of planned NEPA documents and on draft NEPA documents (e.g., draft environmental assessments and draft environmental impacts statements). EIS-0514: Colusa-Sutter 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project; Colusa and Sutter Counties, California Western Area Power Administration (Western) and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District

  12. Integrated use of burden profile probe and in-burden probe for gas flow control in the blast furnace

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bordemann, F.; Hartig, W.H.; Grisse, H.J.; Speranza, B.E.

    1995-12-01

    Gas flow in the blast furnace is one of the most important factors in controlling a furnace. It not only determines the production but also the fuel consumption and the campaign life. At Nos. 4 and 5 blast furnaces of ROGESA, probes are installed for detection of the burden profiles and of the gas flow distribution. For an optimum use of these probes a program system has been developed by ROGESA and Dango and Dienenthal. With this program system it is possible to analyze the operating condition of a blast furnace by means of a fuzzy logic analysis. In case of deviations from the defined desired condition, recommendations for corrective measures for the material distribution are made. Both furnaces are equipped with a bell-less top, a coal injection system, high-temperature hot blast stoves with heat recovery and a top gas pressure recovery turbine. Most of the time it is impossible to control all the required parameters. For this reason it is meaningful to measure the actual material distribution at the furnace top by means of a burden profile probe which permits quick and repeated measurements without any retroactive effects. The paper describes the instrumentation of the furnace, correlation of measuring methods, and a program system for analysis of measuring data.

  13. QER- Comment of Institute for Energy Research

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Institute for Energy Research would like to submit a comment for the DOE's Quadrennial Energy Review. You will find the comment attached, and we would like to be listed as: Institute for Energy Research 1155 15th St Nw, Suite 1900 Washington, D.C. 20005 Thank you for the opportunity to comment!

  14. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find AGA's comments relating to critical issues facing the natural gas distribution industry, which we believe could be usefully addressed in the first phase of the DOE Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). Our comments as submitted here consist of a cover letter and four additional attachments. My colleague Pam Lacey has previously submitted AGA's comments relating to methane emissions under separate cover.

  15. QER- Comment of Lisa Petrie

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To Whom it May Concern: Attached please find my comments for the Quadrennial Energy Review. I attended the meeting and gave the comments orally, but I wasn't able to finish because of the 3-minute time limit, so I'm sending them in written form (with a couple of very small revisions). I'd also like to say that I was disappointed to find that the meeting was poorly publicized, that very few members of the general public or the environmental community were present, and that there were no environmentalists or opponents of the proposed AIM pipeline expansion project among the formal speakers. I sincerely hope that future hearings will be more balanced, in keeping with this Administration's promise of transparent government that's responsive to the needs and concerns of its citizens. Thank you so much for taking the time to read and consider my comments. Respectfully Yours, Lisa Petrie Stay-at-home mom and concerned citizen

  16. Palm: Easing the Burden of Analytical Performance Modeling

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Tallent, Nathan R.; Hoisie, Adolfy

    2014-06-01

    Analytical (predictive) application performance models are critical for diagnosing performance-limiting resources, optimizing systems, and designing machines. Creating models, however, is difficult because they must be both accurate and concise. To ease the burden of performance modeling, we developed Palm, a modeling tool that combines top-down (human-provided) semantic insight with bottom-up static and dynamic analysis. To express insight, Palm defines a source code modeling annotation language. By coordinating models and source code, Palm's models are `first-class' and reproducible. Unlike prior work, Palm formally links models, functions, and measurements. As a result, Palm (a) uses functions to either abstract or express complexity (b) generates hierarchical models (representing an application's static and dynamic structure); and (c) automatically incorporates measurements to focus attention, represent constant behavior, and validate models. We discuss generating models for three different applications.

  17. EAC Recommendations Regarding Emerging and Alternative Regulatory...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    of regulatoryutility business models. The paper includes a summary of regulatory model initiatives, current and emerging regulatory models, and emerging requirements, and...

  18. Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 Regulatory Considerations for Developing Distributed Generation Projects Webinar May 23, 2012 Document covers the Regulatory...

  19. From: Mills, Pamela To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Strack, Jan

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Mills, Pamela To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Strack, Jan Subject: National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment Date: Friday, October 17, 2014 6:18:37 PM Attachments: SDGE Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment.docx Please find attached SDG&E's comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment. Any questions or comments regarding the attached document should be

  20. OpenEI Community - regulatory

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Now http:en.openei.orgcommunitybloggeothermal-regulatory-roadmap-featured-nrel-now

    Navigating the complex system of federal and...

  1. Regulatory Drivers | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Drivers Regulatory Drivers Statutes and Regulations Relating to Legacy Management Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 10: Energy "Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste," 10 CFR 61 "Occupational Radiation Protection," 10 CFR 835 Title 40: Protection of Environment "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations," 40 CFR 141 "Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities,"

  2. Revised analyses of decommissioning for the reference boiling water reactor power station. Effects of current regulatory and other considerations on the financial assurance requirements of the decommissioning rule and on estimates of occupational radiation exposure: Appendices, draft report for comment. Volume 2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, R.I.; Bierschbach, M.C.; Konzek, G.J.

    1994-09-01

    On June 27, 1988, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published in the Federal Register (53 FR 24018) the final rule for the General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities. With the issuance of the final rule, owners and operators of licensed nuclear power plants are required to prepare, and submit to the NRC for review, decommissioning plans and cost estimates. The NRC staff is in need of updated bases documentation that will assist them in assessing the adequacy of the licensee submittals, from the viewpoint of both the planned actions, including occupational radiation exposure, and the probable costs. The purpose of this reevaluation study is to update the needed bases documentation. This report presents the results of a review and reevaluation of the PNL 1980 decommissioning study of the Washington Public Power Supply System`s WNP-2, including all identifiable factors and cost assumptions which contribute significantly to the total cost of decommissioning the plant for the DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB decommissioning alternatives, which now include an initial 5-7 year period during which time the spent fuel is stored in the spent fuel pool prior to beginning major disassembly or extended safe storage of the plant. This report also includes consideration of the NRC requirement that decontamination and decommissioning activities leading to termination of the nuclear license be completed within 60 years of final reactor shutdown, consideration of packaging and disposal requirements for materials whose radionuclide concentrations exceed the limits for Class C low-level waste. Costs for labor, materials, transport, and disposal activities are given in 1993 dollars. Sensitivities of the total license termination cost to the disposal costs at different low-level radioactive waste disposal sites, to different depths of contaminated concrete surface removal within the facilities, and to different transport distances are also examined.

  3. QER- Comment of Southern Company

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Southern Company Services, Inc., as agent for Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company, (collectively, “Southern Companies”), are pleased to hereby provide their comments to the Department of Energy as it prepares the Quadrennial Energy Review. If there is anything else that we can do in this regard, please feel free to contact us.

  4. QER- Comment of Silvia Wessel

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    One additional comment I have: In order to ensure success of the H2 infrastructure the fueling stations need to meet the expectations of the customer and more specifically the H2 quality specifications necessary to protect the fuel cell vehicles.

  5. QER- Comment of Mitsubishi Electric

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Karen: On behalf of Brian Heery, president and CEO of Mitsubishi Electric Power Products, attached are comments regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review. As a US-based manufacturer of large transformers and other energy infrastructure technologies, we welcome the opportunity to meet with you on issues affecting the Nations transmission grid.

  6. Interested Parties - WAPA Public Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    WAPA Public Comment Interested Parties - WAPA Public Comment Comments Received in Response to Western Area Power Administration's Federal Register Notice Titled 'Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments.' PDF icon Microsoft Word - AAAA1.doc More Documents & Publications Mid-West Electric Consumers Association Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx

  7. REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT PDF icon RPS PDF.PDF More Documents & Publications REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT: Natural Gas Use in Transportation REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT: Natural Gas Use in Transportation

  8. Studies of charging stream trajectories and burden distribution in the blast furnace

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    McCarthy, M.J.; Mayfield, P.L.; Zulli, P.; Rex, A.J.; Tanzil, W.B.U.

    1993-01-01

    This work discusses the sensitivity of key blast furnace performance parameters to different gas flow distributions achieved by altering the burden distribution. The changes in burden distribution are brought about by different charging stream trajectories, and methods developed and evaluated for measuring the trajectories both on and off line are described.

  9. Rules implementing Sections 201 and 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978: a regulatory history

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Danziger, R.N.; Caples, P.W.; Huning, J.R.

    1980-09-15

    An analysis is made of the rules implementing Sections 201 and 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA). The act provides that utilities must purchase power from qualifying producers of electricity at nondiscriminatory rates, and it exempts private generators from virtually all state and Federal utility regulations. Most of the analysis presented is taken from the perspective of photovoltaics (PV) and solar thermal electric point-focusing distributed receivers (pfdr). It is felt, however, that the analysis is applicable both to cogeneration and other emerging technologies. Chapters presented are: The FERC Response to Oral Comments on the Proposed Rules Implementing Sections 201 and 210 of PURPA; Additional Changes Made or Not Made That Were Addressed in Other Than Oral Testimony; View on the Proposed Rules Implementing Sections 201 and 210 of PURPA; Response to Comments on the Proposed 201 and 210 Rules; and Summary Analysis of the Environmental Assessment of the Rules. Pertinent reference material is provided in the Appendices, including the text of the rules. (MCW)

  10. Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Public Comment...

  11. Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges DC...

  12. Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Ingersoll Rand Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges PDF...

  13. PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PDF icon PIA - DOE OCIO, Open...

  14. Modifications for Public Comment - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Modifications for Public Comment Tri-Party Agreement The Agreement Announcements List of Approved Changes TPA Project Manager's Lists Modifications for Public Comment Data Management MP-14 WIDS Information Hanford Site Waste Management Units Report Hanford Public Involvement Plan Administrative Record (AR) Related Links Modifications for Public Comment Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size NOTE: Some documents are in the Adobe Acrobat Portable Document

  15. Recommendation 192: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy 2: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report Recommendation 192: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report The ORSSAB presented to DOE Recommendations and Comments on the Draft 2010 Remediation Effectiveness Report for the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation. PDF icon Recommendation 192 PDF icon DOE response to recommendation 192 More Documents & Publications ORSSAB Meeting - May 2013 ORSSAB Meeting - June 2013 ORSSAB Meeting - April 2014

  16. QER - Comment of Entergy | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Entergy QER - Comment of Entergy From: Turton, Daniel [dturton@entergy.com] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 5:12 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Subject: Comments on Enhancing Energy Infrastructure Resiliency and Addressing Vulnerabilities Attachment: Entergy Responses to Key Questions Regarding Energy System Vulnerabiliti....pdf Please find our comments for submission attached. My contact information is below if needed. Dan Turton Vice President, Federal Government Affairs Entergy

  17. LTS Plan Workshop Questions and Comments

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    LTS Plan Workshop Questions and Comments August 28, 2002 Monitoring and Maintenance 1. Is there a possibility of spontaneous combustion in the disposal cell? Response J-1: The concerns raised by the comments are valid for certain well-defined scenarios, most of which involve either composting protocols or disposal of organic mass in demolition or municipal landfills. The commentator references the quantity of more than 10,000 cubic yards of wood or other similar materials incorporated into the

  18. Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI regarding the communication needs of utilities which are incorporated by reference as part of the comments in this proceeding. PDF icon Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities

  19. The EIS Comment-Response Process | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS. PDF icon The EIS Comment-Response Process More

  20. Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access Consumers Union, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen submit the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy (-DOE or -Department) in the above-referenced matter. PDF icon Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access More Documents & Publications Comments on Smart Grid data access AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing

  1. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Chantel |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy from Chantel Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Chantel Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Chantel 06-09-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Mr. Garrett Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Rutherford Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Campbell

  2. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Marshall

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Hughes | Department of Energy from Marshall Hughes Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Marshall Hughes Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Marshall Hughes 07-10-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Mr. Dyer Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Sheila Beck Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Patti McCutchen

  3. Comments of Crow Wing Power | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Crow Wing Power Comments of Crow Wing Power Comments of Crow Wing Power on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Crow Wing Power More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of East Central Energy- Minnesota

  4. EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses On July 2, 2014 in the Federal Register, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published and requested comment on draft guidance for implementing Section 242 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005). See 79 FR 37733 (July 2, 2014). In many instances, there were common themes among the commenters. This document consolidates and summarizes the comments and responds to the comments. PDF icon EPAct Section

  5. Consolidated Storage Facilities: Camel's Nose or Shared Burden? - 13112

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Williams, James M.

    2013-07-01

    The Blue Ribbon Commission (BRC) made a strong argument why the reformulated nuclear waste program should make prompt efforts to develop one or more consolidated storage facilities (CSFs), and recommended the amendment of NWPA Section 145(b) 2 (linking 'monitored retrievable storage' to repository development) as an essential means to that end. However, other than recommending that the siting of CSFs should be 'consent-based' and that spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at stranded sites should be first-in-line for removal, the Commission made few recommendations regarding how CSF development should proceed. Working with three other key Senators, Jeff Bingaman attempted in the 112. Congress to craft legislation (S. 3469) to put the BRC recommendations into legislative language. The key reason why the Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2012 did not proceed was the inability of the four senators to agree on whether and how to amend NWPA Section 145(b). A brief review of efforts to site consolidated storage since the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 suggests a strong and consistent motivation to shift the burden to someone (anyone) else. This paper argues that modification of NWPA Section 145(b) should be accompanied by guidelines for regional development and operation of CSFs. After review of the BRC recommendations regarding CSFs, and the 'camel's nose' prospects if implementation is not accompanied by further guidelines, the paper outlines a proposal for implementation of CSFs on a regional basis, including priorities for removal from reactor sites and subsequently from CSFs to repositories. Rather than allowing repository siting to be prejudiced by the location of a single remote CSF, the regional approach limits transport for off-site acceptance and storage, increases the efficiency of removal operations, provides a useful basis for compensation to states and communities that accept CSFs, and gives states with shared circumstances a shared stake in storage and disposal in an integrated national program. (authors)

  6. QER- Comment of Berkshire Hathaway Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached for filing is a brief comment from Berkshire Hathaway Energy along with a supporting attachment for DOE’s consideration. Regards, Jay

  7. Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    and Saguaro, Arizona substations. EIS-0463: Northern Pass Transmission Line Project, New Hampshire Draft EIS and Supplement to the Draft EIS: Public Comment Periods End 1416...

  8. SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Transmission Project Comments Provided to the US Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Request for Information Relating to the Permitting...

  9. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 4

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    From: Peterson, Christopher (EIA)Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:11 PMTo: Pierpoint, LaraSubject: FW: AGA comments to QER: Natural Gas Emissions Section

  10. BPA Response to Customer Comments-EBBA

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Integration Team Responses to Customer Comments Received on BPA's Proposed Enhanced BPA Balancing Authority (EBBA) - 61212 Table of Contents 1. Market-based Mechanisms...

  11. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 5

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on finance and market incentives. Thank you, Hallie

  12. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the August 8th public meeting on infrastructure constraints. Thank you, Hallie

  13. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 4

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept this paper as comment into the QER record for the August 21st public meeting on infrastructure siting. Thank you, Hallie

  14. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 3

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept this paper as comment into the QER record for the August 11th public meeting on state, local and tribal issues. Thank you, Hallie

  15. QER- Comment of Airlines for America

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Attached please find the comments of Airlines for America concerning the October 6 meeting, energy infrastructure. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions.

  16. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 8

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on rural electrification, biomass processing and transportation. Thank you, Hallie

  17. Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation ...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability...

  18. State policies affecting natural gas consumption (Notice of inquiry issued on August 14, 1992). Summary of comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lemon, R.; Kamphuis-Zatopa, W.

    1993-03-25

    On August 14, 1992, the United States Department of Energy issued a Request for Comments Concerning State Policies Affecting Natural Gas Consumption. This Notice of (NOI) noted the increasing significance of the role played by states and sought to gain better understanding of how state policies impact the gas industry. The general trend toward a. more competitive marketplace for natural gas, as well as recent regulatory and legislative changes at the Federal level, are driving State regulatory agencies to reevaluate how they regulate natural gas. State action is having a significant impact on the use of natural gas for generating electricity, as well as affecting the cost-effective trade-off between conservation expenditures and gas use. Additionally, fuel choice has an impact upon the environment and national energy security. In light of these dimensions, the Department of Energy initiated this study of State regulation. The goals of this NOI are: (1) help DOE better understand the impact of State policies on the efficient use of gas; (2) increase the awareness of the natural gas industry and Federal and State officials to the important role of State policies and regulations; (3) create an improved forum for dialogue on State and Federal natural gas issues; and, (4) develop a consensus on an analytical agenda that would be most helpful in addressing the regulatory challenges faced by the States. Ninety-seven parties filed comments, and of these ninety-seven, fifteen parties filed reply comments. Appendix One lists these parties. This report briefly syntheses the comments received. The goal is to assist parties to judging the extent of consensus on the problems posed and the remedies suggested, aid in identifying future analytical analyses, and assist parties in assessing differences in strategies and regulatory philosophies which shape these issues and their resolution.

  19. HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio ...

  20. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the...

  1. National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014 National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No....

  2. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby...

  3. EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension for Time for Comments EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology In response to a public request, the...

  4. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light...

  5. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Block Plains and Eastern Clean Line: Arkansas and Oklahoma Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon ...

  6. Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring Federal Authorizations Extension of Comment...

  7. Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by the...

  8. NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013 ...

  9. Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request forInformation...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of ... Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of ...

  10. City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 The City of Fort...

  11. Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Florida Power and Light Comments on...

  12. NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013...

  13. City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:...

  14. PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia PEPCO Comments ... Order No. 202-05-3 of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Comments on ...

  15. Comments of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Cisco Systems provides comments in response to the RFI issued by DOE on addressing policy andlogistical challenges to smart grid implementation. PDF icon Comments of Cisco Systems ...

  16. Comments of Current Group, LLC | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments of Current Group, LLC regarding the request for information: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation PDF icon Comments of Current Group, ...

  17. Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: ...

  18. Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments ...

  19. Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Verizon and Verizon Wireless comments to DOE on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing policy and logistical challenges to smart grid implementation PDF icon Comments of Verizon and ...

  20. CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments | National Nuclear...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Office of General Counsel National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) NEPA Reading Room CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments...

  1. A method for burden distribution estimation from probe data in the blast furnace

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nikus, M.; Saxen, H.; Bulsari, A.

    1996-12-31

    A novel approach for estimation of burden distribution in the blast furnace is presented. The proposed model makes use of only temperature measurements from an above-burden probe, and interprets the changes in temperature at charging in terms of burden distribution. In this study it is demonstrated that the temperature changes can be predicted quite accurately for all dumps in a charging sequence using neural networks., The basic structures of both an on-line and an off-line model are presented.

  2. Continuous measurement of blast furnace burden profile at SSAB Tunnplat AB

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Virtala, J.; Edberg, N.; Hallin, M. . Ironmaking Division)

    1993-01-01

    A unique profile meter system is installed on Blast Furnace No. 2 in SSAB - Swedish Steel AB, Lulea, Sweden. This system measures the charge material burden profile across the furnace top diameter before and after each charge. The system generates real-time data, which is graphically presented by the system on a monitor and includes burden descent speed, layer thickness of the coke and ore (corrected for descent), ore to coke ratio, and burden skewing. The system is described along with operational results.

  3. QER- Comment of Wyoming Infrastructure Authority

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis: Please accept the attached letter of comments pursuant to the above referenced meeting. I have also mailed the letter. We appreciate the scheduling of the meeting in Cheyenne and the opportunity to provide comments on permitting and siting of infrastructure on public lands. Regards,

  4. QER- Comment of American Hydrogen Northeast, Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Sir or Madam, Attached please find the Hydrogen Association and the American Hydrogen Northeast,inc's Comments on the first round of QER review. I wish to thank Secretary Moniz and Senator Reed for attending the Providence hearing and providing this opportunity to submit these comments.

  5. QER- Comment of Canadian Electricity Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Ms. Pickett and/or DOE staff: Attached please find comments of the Canadian Electricity Association (CEA) on the Quadrennial Energy Review. Please confirm receipt at your convenience and please advise if you require anything further. Many thanks for this opportunity to provide comments. Best regards,

  6. QER- Comment of Process Gas Consumer Group

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Attached are comments offered by the Process Gas Consumers Group in response to the August 25, 2014 Federal Register Notice soliciting comments on issues related to the Quadrennial Energy Review. Please let us know if you have any questions or would like any additional information.

  7. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find AGA's comments on methane emissions issues in the first phase of the DOE Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), consisting of a cover letter and attachments. Dr. Kathryn Clay will be submitting AGA's comments on other aspects of the QER. Please let me know if you have any questions.

  8. QER- Comment of Electric Drive Transportation Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached the comments of the Electric Drive Transportation Association regarding the first volume of the Department of Energy’s QER. If you have questions about our submittal or require further information, please contact me using the information provided below. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Genevieve Cullen

  9. QER- Comment of American petroleum Institute (API)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached API's comments (and associated attachments) to the Department of Energy's Public Comment on the Quadrennial Energy Review [79 FR 50638, Doc. No. 2014-20114]. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or need anything else.

  10. 5.0 INTERFACE OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5-1 5.0 INTERFACE OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES 5.1 REGULATORY PROGRAMS The RCRA, CERCLA, and State Dangerous Waste Program overlap in many areas. In general, CERCLA was created by...

  11. Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework February 2012 Presentation that outlines the rules, policies and orders that comprise the Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework. PDF icon Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework More Documents & Publications Summary Pamphlet, Nuclear Safety at the Department of Energy Notice of Violation, UChicago Argonne, LLC - WEA-2009-04 Independent Oversight Assessment, Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant -

  12. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission functional organization charts

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1990-08-15

    Functional organization charts for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission offices, divisions, and branches are presented in this document.

  13. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission functional organization charts

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1990-04-01

    Functional organization charts for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission offices, divisions, and branches are presented in this document.

  14. Portsmouth Regulatory Approach | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Approach Portsmouth Regulatory Approach The regulatory framework for the Decontamination & Decommissioning program requires five major decisions with public input, as outlined in the Director’s Final Findings and Orders. The regulatory framework for the Decontamination & Decommissioning program requires five major decisions with public input, as outlined in the Director's Final Findings and Orders. Environmental Remediation Environmental remediation, or the cleanup of

  15. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1989 Information Digest

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    None,

    1989-03-01

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1989 Information Digest provides summary information regarding the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, its regulatory responsibilities, and areas licensed by the Commission. This is the first of an annual publication for the general use of the NRC staff and is available to the public. The Digest is divided into two parts: the first presents an overview of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the second provides data on NRC commercial nuclear reactor licensees and commercial nuclear power reactors worldwide.

  16. Restrospective Regulatory Review | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Restrospective Regulatory Review Restrospective Regulatory Review On January 18, 2011, President Obama issued Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, which directs federal agencies, among other things, to review existing regulations and determine whether they are still necessary and crafted effectively to solve current problems. The Managing Director of the Federal Register wrote in a recent blog of the value of a commitment to retrospective regulatory review, using

  17. QER- Comment of Jerry Toenyes

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), specifically the water/energy nexus. Unfortunately there is little relationship between water operations and power generation in decisions involving the Federal hydropower facilities located in California. Power is the lowest priority of the various project purposes met by the Federal projects and does not receive consideration in short term and long term planning. Water only flows through Federal power plants while it is being released by the dams to meet other project purposes.

  18. 150122 Traxys DOE RFI Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    TRAXYS RESPONSES to DOE'S RFI ON EXCESS URANIUM MANAGEMENT Summary Statements based on Traxys' contracts and EIA Form 858 Filings: 1. Traxys is a primary, direct participant in the sale and introduction to market of the majority of DOE's excess uranium sales via a contractual relationship with Fluor B&W Portsmouth (FBP) to purchase and monetize all the UF6 it receives from DOE for services. Based on this unique position, Traxys is the only company that can factually comment and have actual

  19. Toshiba RFI Comments.xlsx

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Definition and Scope Answer/Comment 1 What significant policy challenges are likely to remain unaddressed if we employ Title XIII's definition? The following points are not referencedd in EISA 1301. ・Power provider should also control the output fluctuation of renewable resources. ・The end user should have the choice of which form of power storage to be used. Certain types of energy conservation and storage could work better in different applications (e.g. not only electricity power but also

  20. Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap presentation at the April 2013 peer review meeting held in Denver, Colorado. PDF icon grr_peer2013.pdf More Documents & Publications track 1: systems analysis | geothermal 2015 peer review Geothermal Technologies Program Annual Peer Review Presentation By Doug Hollett Validation of Innovation Exploration Technologies for Newberry Volcano

  1. Informing Policymakers and Regulatory Support

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Informing Policymakers and Regulatory Support - Sandia Energy Energy Search Icon Sandia Home Locations Contact Us Employee Locator Energy & Climate Secure & Sustainable Energy Future Stationary Power Energy Conversion Efficiency Solar Energy Wind Energy Water Power Supercritical CO2 Geothermal Natural Gas Safety, Security & Resilience of the Energy Infrastructure Energy Storage Nuclear Power & Engineering Grid Modernization Battery Testing Nuclear Fuel Cycle Defense Waste

  2. Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Alton Strategic Environmental Group New Port Richey, FL charles.alton@earthlink.net April 4, 2011 Daniel Cohen, Assistant General Counsel Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Dear Mr. Cohen: I have reviewed the Request For Information regarding Reducing Regulatory Reform issued February 3, 2011 (Federal Register /Vol. 76, No. 23 /Thursday, February 3, 2011 /Notices). In the

  3. Comments of San Diego Gas & Electric Company | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    submits these comments in response to the above-enumerated Request for Information noticed by the Department on May 11, 2010. SDG&E is a regulated electric and gas utility operating pursuant to authorities granted to it by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the State of California. SDG&E serves 3.4 million consumers in the San Diego and southern Orange County areas of California via 1.4 million electric meters and 830,000 gas meters. SDG&E's sister company, the Southern

  4. Comments of San Diego Gas & Electric Company | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    files these comments in response to the above-enumerated Request for Information noticed by the Department on May 11, 2010. SDG&E is a regulated public electric and gas utility operating pursuant to authorities granted to it by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the State of California. SDG&E serves 3.4 million consumers in the San Diego and southern Orange County areas of California via 1.4 million electric meters and 830,000 gas meters. SDG&E's sister company, the

  5. Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL PDF icon Comment ListingResponse_REEE Solicitation_final.pdf More Documents & Publications Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments Draft Advanced Nuclear Energy Solicitation Public Meeting Presentation DOE-LPO_Email-Update_001_Through_11

  6. Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    the Bonneville Power Administration Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration BPA appreciates the opportunity to provide comments and information and submits the following comments in response to the DOE RFI. PDF icon Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration More Documents & Publications RE: NBP RFI: Communication Requirements CX-001184: Categorical Exclusion Determination Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies

  7. Comments to Section 934 Rulemaking | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    to Section 934 Rulemaking Comments to Section 934 Rulemaking ConverDyn's comments on section 934 rulemaking PDF icon Comments to Section 934 Rulemaking More Documents & Publications NOPR ConverDyn Memo to DOE re conference call minutes Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation

  8. Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments PDF icon Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments More Documents & Publications Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL Draft Advanced Nuclear Energy Solicitation Public Meeting Presentation

  9. QER- Comment of Sander Resources

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good morning. I wanted to follow up on our discussion regarding Section 4.4 of the briefing document used for the QER event on Energy Infrastructure Financing. Per my earlier comments, information in that section does not accurately reflect the business model of pipelines, and particularly for the "midstream" sector, or those gathering and processing activities and intrastate pipelines. Further, it does not accurately describe the "utility" designation of these lines or how or why these designations are used. It is also important to note that the reference to "take-or-pay" contracts is particularly concerning as those types of contracts are prohibited in many states as I understand it. I have attached an updated redline version of that section that addresses the issues. I would be more than happy to work with someone to correct the language if the suggested language does not work for any reason. Thank you for your consideration of the comments and proposed changes. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance.

  10. QER- Comment of Brian West

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Thanks for the invitation to the QER workshop. Here are a couple of comments that I was probably unable to fully articulate in the main session, although I did try to make some of these points in the breakout session: When considering alternatives and policy that drives alternative fuel use, it is important to learn from Policy successes and failures. Policy drivers put in place in Thailand, Brazil, and Sweden have been successful in transitions to greater alternative fuel use. US policy for Flex Fuel Vehicles has been largely unsuccessful at encouraging alternative fuel use. The fuel economy credit for the OEMs to build FFVs was generous but encouraged only modest production; nonetheless there are over 15M FFVs on the road. However, they use very little ethanol fuel due to cost ($/mile), range, etc. Natural Gas has a very real value proposition (lower $/gge) so fleet owners have good financial incentive to make the switch, even if investments are required. One participant commented that infrastructure costs are small compared to costs of imported oil. I agree with this statement. One presenter mentioned (a city?) with a law that requires infrastructure to support future EV charging be installed in any new parking garage. Great idea. (Better to have and not need than need and not have, especially when cost differential is small on the front end and very large on the back end). In the US we install about 20,000-40,000 new fuel dispensers per year (according to Gilbarco/Wayne). It would be a horrible missed opportunity to not put policy in place that encourages/requires E25 or E85-compatible dispensers. With a successful policy driver, in the next five years the nation could have over 100,000 ethanol-compatible dispensers in place, ready for a new High Octane Fuel (that could very likely contain more than 10 or 15% ethanol). Thanks Brian H. West Fuels, Engines, and Emissions Research Center Oak Ridge National Laboratory http://www.ornl.gov/ http://feerc.ornl.gov/ http://www.fueleconomy.gov/ From: Tillemann, Levi Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 3:52 PM To: West, Brian H. Subject: AMR/QER Technical Workshop Dear Brian: On behalf of the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) I want to thank you for your participation at the June 20th AMR/QER Alternative Transportation Refueling Infrastructure technical workshop. Your contribution in the breakout sessions and general discussion sessions provided valuable insight that will help inform EPSA during the QER process going forward. During the course of the workshop, detailed notes were taken. These have been anonymized and will be made publically available to you and the general public in the coming weeks. Once they are posted, we will provide you with a link for accessing them online. We encourage you to submit additional comments regarding infrastructure for transmission, storage or distribution of alternative transportation fuels to qercomments@hq.doe.gov. For more information about the QER's stakeholder meeting locations, areas of analysis and public comments you can visit the QER website at: http://energy.gov/epsa/initiatives/quadrennial-energy-review-qer. Please feel free to contact me or Sallie Gilbert (sallie.gilbert@hq.doe.gov) if you have additional questions. I will be leaving the DOE August 1, thereafter you may contact Renee Picket (adonica.pickett@hq.doe.gov) or Carla Frisch (carla.frisch@hq.doe.gov) with questions or comments. Thank you again for making the workshop a great success. I look forward to working together with all of you on these issues in the future. Best regards, Levi Tillemann, Ph.D. Special Advisor, EPSA US Department of Energy

  11. EIS-0236-S4: Extension of Comment Period | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension of Comment Period EIS-0236-S4: Extension of Comment Period Complex Transformation Extension of Comment Period for the Draft Complex Transformation Supplemental...

  12. Public Comments Received on the Draft Congestion Study | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Public Comments Received on the Draft Congestion Study Public Comments Received on the Draft Congestion Study On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The draft study is available for review and downloading. The public comment period closed on October 20, 2014. Comments are available through the links below, as of October 20, 2014. Click on the

  13. EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Section 1817 Public Comments EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments Following are all comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy on the February 2007 draft of the Study, "The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issued That May Impede Their Expansion." All comments are provided in their original, unedited format. PDF icon EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments More Documents & Publications The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and the

  14. Comments of ATT&T Inc | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ATT&T Inc Comments of ATT&T Inc AT&T Inc comments on the Department of Energy's third Request for Information (RFI) on Smart Grid issues. PDF icon Comments of ATT&T Inc More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc. Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc.

  15. Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company BGE comments to DOE addressing policy and logistical challenges PDF icon Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company The Need for Essential Consumer Protections: Smart Metering Proposals

  16. DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 Comments of the office of peoples counsel, washington DC in response to the department of energy's request for information concerning smart grid issues. PDF icon DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 More Documents & Publications Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to smart grid Implementation: eMeter Response to Department of Energy RFI Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical

  17. Chapter 2 - Comment Documents Final Y-12 SWEIS

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    - Comment Documents Final Y-12 SWEIS February 2011 2-1 COMMENT RESPONSE DOCUMENT, CHAPTER 2: COMMENT DOCUMENTS This chapter is a compilation of all the documents that the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) received on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex during the public comment period. The documents are presented alphabetically by commentor's last name. On each document the first number represents the comment number within that

  18. RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and American Public Power Association file these brief reply comments in support of the comments and reply comments filed by the Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC"). Both organizations strongly believe that the Administration should ensure that adequate spectrum is available for internal, utility networks.

  19. Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative More Documents & Publications Comments of Utilities Telecom Council Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of

  20. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Avista Corporation NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation Comments of Avista Corporation on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation More Documents & Publications AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments Comments of Utilities Telecom Council RE: NBP RFI: Com

  1. National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    August 2014 | Department of Energy - Draft for Public Comment August 2014 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment August 2014 On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The draft study is available below for review and downloading. The public comment period closed on October 20, 2014. Comments have been posted online.

  2. Dockets Open for Public Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Dockets Open for Public Comment Dockets Open for Public Comment Below is a list of the dockets that are currently open for public comment. The PDF files below contain more information on how to submit your comments. No Dockets Opened for Public Comment: More Documents & Publications Federal Register Notice for Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Perspective on Exporting Liquefied Natural Gas from the United States EIS-0520: Notice of Intent EIS-0519: Notice of Intent

  3. Regulatory Considerations for Developing Generation Projects...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Mason Emnett Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Jonathan First Office of the General Counsel February 6, 2013 NOTE: Comments herein do not represent the views of the Federal ...

  4. Fact Sheet: DOE/National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissione...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOENational Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Natural Gas Infrastructure Modernization Partnership Fact Sheet: DOENational Association of Regulatory Utility...

  5. Microsoft Word - NGP EIS scoping Comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environ me ntal Imp act Statemen t for the Acquisition of a Natural Gas Pipeline and Natural Gas Utility Service at the Hanford Site U.S. Department of Energy Written Comment Form Must be received on or before February 22, 2012. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Douglas Chapin naturalgaseis@rl.gov NEPA Document Manager U.S. DOE/Richland Operations Office Box 550, MSIN A5-11 Richland, WA 99352

  6. Microsoft Word - CLWR Draft SEIS Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Draft Suppl emen tal Envi ron mental I mpa ct Statemen t for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be received on or before September 22, 2014. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Curtis Chambellan tritium.readiness.seis@doeal.gov CLWR SEIS Document Manager U.S. DOE/NNSA Box 5400

  7. Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments from the

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages | Department of Energy from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Docket No.

  8. From: Diana Rivera To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comments of Clean Line Energy on Draft Congestion Study

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Diana Rivera To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comments of Clean Line Energy on Draft Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:54:46 PM Attachments: image002.png Clean Line Comments to DOE 2014 Draft Congestion Study.pdf Hello, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft congestion study. Please see the attached comments from Clean Line Energy Partners. We would be happy to answer any questions or provide additional information. Best regards, Diana Diana Rivera CLEAN LINE

  9. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 AUG i 3 1979 ,,~---Y--*. FCAF:Wi3 )I 70-364 : i: SNM-414,jAmendment No. 3 --A Babcock and Wilcox Company Nuclear Materials Division ATTN: Mr. Michael A. Austin Manager, Technical Control 609 North Warren Avenue Apollo, Pennsylvania 15613 Gentiemen: (1 i' \ (. \ In accordance with your application dated June 18, 1979, and pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 70, Materials License SNM-414 is hereby amended to: 1. Delete the function of the Regulatory

  10. Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    of the comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's intention to commence planned transmission outages of the 230kV transmission lines that serve...

  11. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... system to maintain the physical assets in a condition suitable for their intended use, * The preventive, predictive, and corrective maintenance to ensure physical asset ...

  12. COMMENTS

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and

  13. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    B-1 APPENDIX B RELATED INTERNET WEB SITES WHERE CAN I ACCESS ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REFERENCES LISTED IN THIS REFERENCE BOOK? http://www.cfo.doe.gov/policy/actindex/index.html-ssi DOE Accounting Handbook http://www.pr.doe.gov/acqguide.html DOE Acquisition Guide http://www.pr.doe.gov//acqltr.html DOE Acquisition Letters http://www.pr.doe.gov/dear.html DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) http://www.cfo.doe.gov/progliaison/bmop/index.htm DOE Business Management Oversight Process Web Page

  14. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and

  15. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 SECURITY (RESERVED)

  16. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... agency ethics official for ethics advise on specific conduct ... * Delays in the contract work are minimized; and * ... of members of the contract administration team. ...

  17. QER- Comment of Cloud Peak Energy Inc

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Ms Pickett Please find attached comments from Cloud Peak Energy as input to the Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review. If possible I would appreciate a confirmation that this email has been received Thank you.

  18. QER- Comment of Marcellus Shale Coalition

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the Marcellus Shale Coalitions comments with regard to the U.S. Department of Energys Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Hearing - Natural Gas Transmission, Storage and Distribution. Thank you

  19. QER- Comment of National Propane Gas Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ladies and Gentlemen: Please find attached the QER comments of the National Propane Gas Association. Please feel to contact us if we can provide further information. Thank you for your attention to our submission.

  20. QER- Comment of ND Ethanol Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To whom it may concern, Attached please find comments from the North Dakota Ethanol Council regarding infrastructure constraints in preparation for the OER Public Meeting, which will be held in Bismarck, N.D., on August 8. Sincerely, Deana Wies

  1. QER- Comment of ALLETE Clean Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Please accept the attached comments for docketing. These are submitted on behalf of ALLETE Clean Energy. If you have any questions or need anything further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Many thanks,

  2. QER- Comment of Skibo Systems LLC

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Paul M. Klemencic, Skibo Systems LLC: Comments regarding the current state of all major energy markets, addressing customer costs and needs, infrastructure, market controls and optimization, and build out of green energy sources.

  3. QER- Comment of Husch Blackwell LLP

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good afternoon, Today, WIRES (www.wiresgroup.com) is submitting the attached communication to the United States Secretary of Energy pertaining to the Quadrennial Energy Review. Your comments are welcome and can be sent to me.

  4. Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Alerts Comments

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Alerts Comments If you have a question about Energy Citations Database Alerts, we recommend you check frequently asked questions. If your question still has not been answered or if...

  5. Approval/Variation Request Comment Sheet

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    EA15PC3041-3-0 Mar. 25, 2003 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 2 ApprovalVariation Request Comment Sheet 1. Page of 2. G APPROVAL REQUEST 3. G VARIATION REQUEST 4. ARVR No. 5. POSubcontract No....

  6. QER- Comment of Sempra Energy 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sempra Energy, on behalf of its subsidiaries, San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E), Southern California Gas Company, (SoCalGas) and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power1, respectfully submit the attached comments to the Department of Energy. The attached document provides Sempra Energy’s comments regarding the U.S. Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy review meeting on natural gas transmission, storage and distribution.

  7. QER- Comment of Quebec Government Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, I am pleased to forward the attached QER comments on behalf of Québec’s Delegate General in New York. These comments from the Government of Québec relate to Part II of the New England Regional Infrastructure Constraints Public Meeting on April 21st, 2014. Thank you for allowing the Government of Québec to participate in this important initiative. Please do not hesitate to reach out should you have further questions. Best regards, Tim

  8. QER- Comment of Sempra Energy 1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sempra Energy, on behalf of its subsidiaries, San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E), Southern California Gas Company, (SoCalGas) and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, respectfully submit the attached comments to the Department of Energy. The attached document provides Sempra Energy’s comments regarding the U.S. Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy review meeting on electricity transportation, distribution and storage in the west.

  9. Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Qualcomm Incorporated Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated Qualcomm is pleased to provide these detailed comments to the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") on how current and future wireless broadband communications capabilities can support the energy management needs of electric utilities, businesses, and consumers, which include requirements for the evolving and growing Smart Grid. The DOE should be applauded for timely following-up on the recommendations in the

  10. Microsoft Word - UTC Comments.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of ADDRESSING POLICY AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES TO SMART GRID IMPLEMENTATION ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UTILITIES TELECOM COUNCIL The Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC") is pleased to provide the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. 1 While the RFI raises many important issues

  11. Environmental Regulatory Update Table, November 1991

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

    1991-12-01

    The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

  12. Environmental regulatory update table, July 1991

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

    1991-08-01

    This Environmental Regulatory Update Table (July 1991) provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

  13. Environmental Regulatory Update Table, October 1991

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

    1991-11-01

    The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

  14. Environmental Regulatory Update Table, October 1990

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Houlberg, L.M.; Noghrei-Nikbakht, P.A.; Salk, M.S.

    1990-11-01

    The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

  15. Environmental regulatory update table, March 1989

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Houlberg, L.; Langston, M.E.; Nikbakht, A.; Salk, M.S.

    1989-04-01

    The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

  16. Environmental Regulatory Update Table, September 1991

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Houlberg, L.M.; Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

    1991-10-01

    The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

  17. Environmental Regulatory Update Table, August 1991

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Houlberg, L.M., Hawkins, G.T.; Salk, M.S.

    1991-09-01

    This Environmental Regulatory Update Table (August 1991) provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

  18. Environmental Regulatory Update Table, April 1989

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Houlberg, L.; Langston, M.E.; Nikbakht, A.; Salk, M.S.

    1989-05-01

    The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

  19. Environmental Regulatory Update Table, December 1989

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Houlbert, L.M.; Langston, M.E. ); Nikbakht, A.; Salk, M.S. )

    1990-01-01

    The Environmental Regulatory Update Table provides information on regulatory initiatives of interest to DOE operations and contractor staff with environmental management responsibilities. The table is updated each month with information from the Federal Register and other sources, including direct contact with regulatory agencies. Each table entry provides a chronological record of the rulemaking process for that initiative with an abstract and a projection of further action.

  20. Policy and Regulatory Environment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Soft Costs » Policy and Regulatory Environment Policy and Regulatory Environment Photo of a man speaking while seated at a table with men and women surrounding him. A favorable policy and regulatory environment is a critical precursor to the development of vibrant solar electric markets, even in the presence of dramatically reduced technology costs. At the federal, state, and local levels, a complex set of interdependent policies define the extent to which renewable energy markets are able to

  1. History of Regulatory Oversight at LANL

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    History of Regulatory Oversight History of Regulatory Oversight at LANL History of Regulatory Oversight at LANL 1943-1950: Manhattan Project Era Few environmental regulations Best available protection technologies employed, though rudimentary 1950s-1970s: Cold War Era Laboratory moved from townsite to current location Advent of national environmental protection laws Clean Air Act Clean Water Act Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 1980s-1990s: Non-proliferation/Stockpile Reduction LANL

  2. EIA - Natural Gas Pipeline Network - Regulatory Authorities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Regulatory Authorities About U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines - Transporting Natural Gas based on data through 2007/2008 with selected updates U.S. Natural Gas Regulatory Authorities Beginning | Regulations Today | Coordinating Agencies | Regulation of Mergers and Acquisitions Beginning of Industry Restructuring In April 1992, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued its Order 636 and transformed the interstate natural gas transportation segment of the industry forever. Under it,

  3. Other Regulatory Efforts | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Efforts Other Regulatory Efforts In addition to regulating international electricity trade, the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability participates in other regulatory activities. These include: Collecting and providing notice in the Federal Register when self certification for coal fired generation have been filed under Title II of the Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act. Providing guidance on the implementation of the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA),

  4. Minimization of Blast furnace Fuel Rate by Optimizing Burden and Gas Distribution

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dr. Chenn Zhou

    2012-08-15

    The goal of the research is to improve the competitive edge of steel mills by using the advanced CFD technology to optimize the gas and burden distributions inside a blast furnace for achieving the best gas utilization. A state-of-the-art 3-D CFD model has been developed for simulating the gas distribution inside a blast furnace at given burden conditions, burden distribution and blast parameters. The comprehensive 3-D CFD model has been validated by plant measurement data from an actual blast furnace. Validation of the sub-models is also achieved. The user friendly software package named Blast Furnace Shaft Simulator (BFSS) has been developed to simulate the blast furnace shaft process. The research has significant benefits to the steel industry with high productivity, low energy consumption, and improved environment.

  5. Optimization of ferrous burden high temperature properties to meet blast furnace requirements in British Steel

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bergstrand, R.

    1996-12-31

    The high temperature properties of ferrous burden materials have long been an important consideration in the operation of British Steel blast furnaces. Previous research presented at this conference has shown that the behavior of materials in the lower stack and bosh can have a significant effect on furnace permeability and stability of operation. However, with increasing levels of hydrocarbon injection via the tuyeres, the reduction conditions inside British Steel blast furnaces have significantly altered over recent years. This paper focuses on the further work that has been undertaken to study the effect on ferrous burden high temperatures properties of the widely differing reduction regimes which can be experienced in today`s blast furnaces. The implications of the findings, and how they have been used in optimizing blast furnace operation and burden quality, are discussed.

  6. REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT: Natural...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT: Natural Gas Use in Transportation PDF icon RCC Workplan NGV.PDF More Documents & Publications REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING ...

  7. Other Regulatory Efforts | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    trade, the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability participates in other regulatory activities. These include: Collecting and providing notice in the Federal...

  8. Federal / State Legislative & Regulatory Changes Required for...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Issues Federal and State Blending Restrictions Action by ASTM NCWM to address higher ethanol blends PDF icon Federal State Legislative & Regulatory Changes Required for...

  9. Regulatory Policy Guide/Game Concept Paper

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Driving Ratepayer-Funded Efficiency through Regulatory Policies Working Group

    2011-09-01

    Proposes a new resource for utility regulators to plot a course through regulatory options available to surmount barriers to aggressive and sustained utility investment in energy efficiency programs.

  10. From: Adams, Charlie To: Regulatory.Review Cc: Stern, Jim; Parker, Mike; Dana, Paul; Josh Greene; Frank Stanonik; Neil Rolph; Schuh, Darrell; Roy Smith; Dan

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Adams, Charlie To: Regulatory.Review Cc: Stern, Jim; Parker, Mike; Dana, Paul; Josh Greene; Frank Stanonik; Neil Rolph; Schuh, Darrell; Roy Smith; Dan Snyder; Berning, Dave Subject: EO 13563 Preliminary Plan comments from A.O. Smith Corporation Date: Monday, August 01, 2011 2:59:51 PM A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules A.O. Smith Corporation is the largest manufacturer of residential and commercial water heating equipment in the

  11. By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    June 19, 2012 By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012). AHAM

  12. By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    21, 2011 By E-Mail Daniel Cohen Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Ave., SW Room 6A245 Washington, D.C. 20585 Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Mr. Cohen: The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Request for Information on reducing regulatory burden, 76 Fed.

  13. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    on page 2, to provide an opportunity to submit verbal comments in addition to, or in lieu of, written comments on issues of environmental concern related to the Alaska LNG Project. ...

  14. AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments Attachment to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. PDF icon AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments More Documents & Publications Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation Future Communications Needs

  15. QER- Comment of Stephen Kurkoski

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    I attended the meeting yesterday in Hartford, Conn. I thank you for the opportunity to speak during the public comment period. I thanked the moderator, Fred Hanson, for bringing up the option of Conservation and Energy Efficiency to the last panel. The following are the comments I presented. I would first like to say that the Northeast does not have an energy supply problem. The problem that we have is a demand/supply issue. If the problem is only referred to as a supply problem then only supply solutions will be looked at. When we talk about meeting our energy needs, the conversation should start with: 1st Conservation 2nd Energy Efficiency …..and if we have a concern about Climate Change 3rd Renewables 4th Polluting technologies such as Fossil Fuels and Nuclear If we do not implement this list in the above order we will leave a very different climate and a planet that is difficult to live on for our children. I would next like to illustrate the power of Conservation, Energy Efficiency and Renewables. Two years ago my wife and I had the good fortune to be chosen to participate in the National Grid Deep Energy Retrofit Pilot Program. Thank you to National Grid and the state of Massachusetts. By super insulating and air sealing our house, installing an air-source heat pump and a 2.4kW solar system, along with practicing conservation, our total energy bill for last year was $60, which equals 300 pounds of CO2 equivalent. This includes this past winter with its "polar vortex". Conservation, Efficiency and Renewables have been mentioned by a few of the presenters today. We need to bring Conservation, Efficiency and Renewables to center stage to solve our energy needs. Recommendations: 1. Institute to a greater extent "Peak Load Shaving". 2. Make it mandatory that all buildings that are built are Zero Net Energy or Zero Plus Energy. 3. Institute a more aggressive "Time of Use" Electric and Gas Metering System that Mr Reilly of the Vermont Electric Power Company mentioned earlier. 4. Put a severe Carbon Tax on all polluting Energy Producers. 5. Measure CO2 emissions for the complete cycle of extraction, transportation, storage and burning of all Energy options. 6. Remove all incentives and support for Energy Producers of Fossil Fuel and Nuclear. Thank you, Stephen Kurkoski

  16. QER- Comment of Cynthia Henshaw

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Hello, I have several comments regarding the hearing and document put together regarding infrastructure constraints in New England. 1. Why did the document not discuss the waste and losses of natural gas through existing pipeline leaks? The most cost-effective carbon savings within New England is to repair existing natural gas leaks. If we invested our dollars to upgrade existing transmission, storage and distribution capacity in New England we would not need additional gas pipelines and we'd help protect out health and the environment. These infrastructure improvements should be completed before creating more environmental damage and disruption to additional communities. 2. The best way to encourage investment in infrastructure that will address vulnerabilities is to encourage local energy production - continue to expand local solar panel use (on houses, store roofs and larger systems) and encourage continued development of alternative wind turbines that do not have the environmental and community impacts as the large turbines so that they can be cited near the electric demand. We need to take responsibility for the energy that we use. That means understanding how to generate our own electricity, and promoting conservation and energy efficiency throughout New England. 3. Tennessee Gas is proposing a new gas pipeline across the northern tier of Massachusetts. Why are they not expanding their existing infrastructure that already runs across the southern tier of the state? They already have the rights-of-way and infrastructure in place. The company has not been forthcoming with answers, which sows seeds of distrust. If the company, and federal and state regulators want to increase pipeline capacity then answers to reasonable questions need to be given. AND the public needs to have more than ONE WEEK to provide questions. 4. The Tennessee Gas Pipeline proposed for the northern tier of Massachusetts targets existing conservation infrastructure that was protected for a wide variety of public goods and services. However a gas pipeline that disrupts the soil, air and water was NOT one of the reasons. This proposed pipeline route intentionally targets these areas. This is unacceptable! Thank you for considering my questions and comments. Cynthia Henshaw

  17. National Electrical Manufacturers Association

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    July 24, 2014 VIA EMAIL TO: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Steven Croley, General Counsel Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585 NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI 79 Fed.Reg. 28518 (July 3, 2014) Dear Mr. Croley, The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Department of Energy's efforts to make its regulatory program more effective and less

  18. Assistance to Oil and Gas State Agencies and Industry through Continuation of Environmental and Production Data Management and a Water Regulatory Initiative

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Grunewald, Ben; Arthur, Dan; Langhus, Bruce; Gillespie, Tom; Binder, Ben; Warner, Don; Roberts, Jim; Cox, D.O.

    2002-05-31

    This grant project was a major step toward completion of the Risk Based Data Management System (RBDMS) project. Additionally the project addresses the needs identified during the projects initial phases. By implementing this project, the following outcomes were sought: (1) State regulatory agencies implemented more formalized environmental risk management practices as they pertain to the production of oil and gas, and injection via Class II wells. (2) Enhancement of oil and gas production by implementing a management system supporting the saving of abandoned or idle wells located in areas with a relatively low environmental risk of endangering underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) in a particular state. (3) Verification that protection of USDWs is adequate and additional restrictions of requirements are not necessary in areas with a relatively low environmental risk. (4) Standardization of data and information maintained by state regulatory agencies and decrease the regulatory cost burden on producers operating in multiple states, and (5) Development of a system for electronic data transfer among operators and state regulatory agencies and reduction of overall operator reporting burdens.

  19. Paducah Site Regulatory Documents | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Regulatory Documents Paducah Site Regulatory Documents PDF icon Paducah Site Federal Facility Agreement PDF icon Paducah 2015 Site Management Plan PDF icon Paducah Community Relations Plan R8 - 2013 PDF icon Paducah Site End State Vision - 2008 More Documents & Publications Paducah Site Management Plan

  20. Paducah Regulatory Approach | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Environmental Remediation » Paducah Regulatory Approach Paducah Regulatory Approach Past uranium enrichment operations and support activities generated hazardous, radioactive, mixed (both hazardous and radioactive), and non-chemical (sanitary) waste. Past operations also resulted in soil, groundwater, and surface water contamination. Environmental investigations have been conducted since the 1980s to understand the extent of contamination. Following environmental investigations of the entire

  1. QER- Comment of James Bennett

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, The notice for the April 21 meeting was too short. The April 15 letter just found its way to me. I hope that there will be more such focused meetings in the not too distant future. If possible, please add me to your notification email list for such meetings. Comments: There is increasing conern over the routing and purpose of additional Natural Gas Pipelines in Massachusetts. There is skepticism that the pipelines will be used for export and that the any improvement in the Energy supply for New England will be shortlived due to a rapid depletion of reserves. In other words, why tear up the landscape with little benefit to the region. If the pipelines are contructed, can a restraint be placed on them to prevent export? Have the impacts of leaks and fires been properly considered? New England has heavily forrested areas and we have been having more frequent exteremly dry summers. At least one pipeline route has been suggested that would run through large wooded areas. A pipeline initiated fire would be devestating. Sincerely, Jim Bennett

  2. QER- Comment of Laurel Greenberg

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To the Energy Review Task Force, I am a resident of Boston and also have property in Cummington, Mass. I am commenting specifically on a proposed gas pipeline by Kinder Morgan through the state of Massachusetts, but also generically on energy policy in New England. I am against building another gas pipeline in Massachusetts. The environmental and ecological risk of running a high pressure gas pipeline through conservation land, pristine nature, important water reservoirs, and residents farms and properties is great, and not where we as stewards of the earth should be putting our efforts. We should heed the findings that climate change is upon us and to the recommendations that we must curtail global warming emissions (like methane) and promote and support renewable energy. We should pay attention to recent independent findings that hydraulic fracturing has serious environmental problems, contributes to global warming, is harming water supplies, causes earthquakes, and is not a safe, secure, renewable method of obtaining energy. In summary, as leaders in environmental policy, we in New England should not be encouraging the production of fracked gas by building a conduit for that gas through our states. Laurel Greenberg

  3. QER- Comment of Debra Walworth

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To Whom It May Concern: I want to state upfront that my name is the only thing I want disclosed in my comments--please do not disclose my address or any other personal contact information to the extent to the law. I attended the QER in North Dakota, and want to thank the entire delegation for coming to North Dakota. I found it very interesting and informative. I would like to support the basic idea of a complete energy package that includes oil, coal, wind, solar and bio-fuels. I understand that coal and oil are under a lot of scrutiny for environmental affects. However, we (as a country) are not in a position to stop the use of any of our energy resources. At this point in time, to do so, in my opinion, would be harmful to our country's national security. I feel the dramatic mandates being placed on coal to make other energy resources competitive, is counter-intuitive to national security and future development of alternative energy resources. North Dakota has lead the nation in environmental strategies for clean air, clean water, and clean environment. We also produce a lot of energy from coal. I think the national energy policy should take common sense steps towards the national energy policy that includes all energy resources, instead of knee-jerk reactions from misunderstood and lop-sided actions. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on this very important topic. Sincerely, Debra Walworth

  4. Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules February 17, 2011 - 5:29pm ...

  5. Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-06-1,...

  6. H-Prize Draft Guideline Comments Deadline Extended to Monday...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    H-Prize Draft Guideline Comments Deadline Extended to Monday, April 28 H-Prize Draft Guideline Comments Deadline Extended to Monday, April 28 April 22, 2014 - 2:00pm Addthis The...

  7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER - DOE IS BUSH CHENEY SCUM...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER - DOE IS BUSH CHENEY SCUM COUNTRY THESE DAYS - WE NEED ... PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER - DOE IS BUSH CHENEY SCUM COUNTRY THESE DAYS - WE NEED ...

  8. REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy FORMAT REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT PDF icon RCC Workplan PDF EN FR.PDF More Documents & Publications REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT: Natural Gas Use in Transportation REGULATORY COOPERATION COUNCIL - WORK PLANNING FORMAT: Natural Gas Use in Transportation

  9. Public Comments Submitted by E-mail | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Public Comments Submitted by E-mail Public Comments Submitted by E-mail In order to gather information and recommendations for the Quadrennial Energy Review, EPSA solicited comments from stakeholders and the general public. The public comments are located on this page and can be sorted by heading, searched by topic using the tags below, or by entering search terms in the search field. Tags EPSA QER Downloads Page Title Name of Organization Name of Submitter Tags

  10. Hanford Advisory Board Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings Welcome to this Hanford Advisory Board meeting. The Board appreciates this opportunity to hear your views and comments on Hanford cleanup activities. Your comments will be summarized in the Board meeting minutes. Board meetings are also routinely audio-recorded. If you wish, you may at any time provide written comments to the Board at: Hanford Advisory Board c/o EnviroIssues Hanford Project Office 713 Jadwin #3 Richland, Washington 99352

  11. QER- Comment of Office of Franklin County Commissioner Paula Brooks

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please see the attached comments from Franklin County, Ohio Commissioner Paula Brooks on the Quadrennial Energy Review.

  12. QER - Comment of Dairyland Power Cooperative - FWD by John Richards |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Dairyland Power Cooperative - FWD by John Richards QER - Comment of Dairyland Power Cooperative - FWD by John Richards From: Richards, John Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:01 PM To: QERcomments Subject: FW: DPC written comments Attachment: 2014.08.08 Dairyland Power Cooperative written comments for Chicago QER session.pdf From: Richards, John Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 5:28 PM To: 'ashikany@energetics.com' Subject: Fw: DPC written comments From: Sean L Craig

  13. Draft Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment Draft Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment Green Grid Gateway @ North Coast Oregon. America's First Smart Grid R&D Testing Business Campus PDF icon Draft Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment More Documents & Publications Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Smart

  14. WIPP RCRA Documents - Class 2 Mods for comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    RCRA Public Comments Menu Public Invited to Comment on Permit Modifications The public is invited to comment on the following proposed modifications to the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Comments should be directed via e-mail to Ricardo.Maestas@state.nm.us or by regular mail to: Mr. Ricardo Maestas New Mexico Environment Department Hazardous Waste Bureau 2905 Rodeo Park Drive, Building E Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 Temporary Authorization Requests: Temporary

  15. Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment March 15, 2013 - 11:08am Addthis Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment DOE has issued the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (ULP PEIS)(DOE/EIS-0472D) for public review and comment. The document is available here and on the ULP PEIS website. Under the

  16. QER- Comment of Association of Oil Pipe Lines

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached AOPL's comments to DOE's safety discussion in preparation for the New Orleans, LA public meeting. Thanks, John

  17. Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Comms Requirements |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Comms Requirements Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Comms Requirements Comments of Silver Spring Networks on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Comms Requirements More Documents & Publications Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Data Access NBP RFI: Communications Requirements-

  18. Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Motorola, Inc. Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. Reply comments from Motorola, Inc. on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. More Documents & Publications Comments of Motorola, Inc. Re: DOE Request for Information - Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart

  19. Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Comments made on behalf of the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM), on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (Sept. 17, 2010). PDF icon Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy And Logistical Challenges. November 1, 2010 More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE

  20. Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Nuclear Damage | Department of Energy NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage ENERGYSOLUTIONS' Comment in Response to Notice of Inquiry, Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation -75 FR 43945 PDF icon Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage More Documents & Publications Public comment re

  1. QER - Comment of Energy Storage Association | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Storage Association QER - Comment of Energy Storage Association From: Katherine Hamilton [katherine@38northsolutions.com] on behalf of Katherine Hamilton [k.hamilton@energystorage.org] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 4:37 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Comments from Energy Storage Association Attachment: ESA QER Comments10 10 14FINAL.pdf; ATT00001.htm Attached please find comments from the Energy Storage Association on the Department of Energy's Quadrennial Energy Review. Thank you for the

  2. From: Henderson, Michael To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Henderson, Michael To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David Cc: Doe, Stanley; Kowalski, Richard; Paradise, Theodore Subject: DOE Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 10:12:20 AM Attachments: image001.png ISO New England is pleased to provide comments on the public draft of the DOE Congestion Study. The ISO appreciates DOE's consideration of several specific comments shown in red below. Comments: Figure ES-2: It is possible to identify the consistent impacts of a few specific

  3. From: Tunnell, Andrew To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Southern Companies" Comments to Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:17:22 PM Attachments: balch_logof0638c DOE Congestion Comments.pdf In accordance with the Department of Energy's instructions provided at: http://www.energy.gov/oe/downloads/national-congestion-study-notice-public-comment-federal- register-notice-volume-79-no, find attached Southern Companies' comments regarding the draft Transmission National Electric Congestion Study that

  4. Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment for Installation of a Renewable Energy Anaerobic Digester Facility at the University of California, Davis in Yolo County, California. PDF icon Request for Public and Agency Comments More Documents & Publications Floodplain Assessment and Statement of Findings Floodplain

  5. How to Participate or Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Appliance & Equipment Standards » Rulemakings & Notices » How to Participate or Comment How to Participate or Comment The Department of Energy (DOE) encourages stakeholders and the general public to participate in its rulemakings. You can participate in rulemakings by: Viewing Federal Register notices, supporting documents, and public comments in the rulemaking docket found on Regulations.gov By submitting comments to the docket By attending public meetings or participating in webinars

  6. Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute in response to DOE' s July 27, 2010 Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comment (Notice) regarding implementation of Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Act). PDF icon Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking More Documents & Publications Exelon response CSC_Extension.PDF Memorandum

  7. Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC More Documents & Publications Current Communications Needs Future Communications Needs NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy- Comments of Oncor

  8. Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric onImplementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Great River Energy Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies NBP RFI:

  9. Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority More Documents & Publications Lower Colorado River Authority Lower Colorado River Authority NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light

  10. DOE Comments - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) DOE Comments - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) PDF icon 1. United States Department of Energy Comments on "Application of Protective Action Guides (PAGs) for Radiological Dispersal Devices (RDD) and Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) Incidents"; Notice (71 FR 174; January 3, 2006) PDF icon 2. Department of Energy Comments on NCRP SC 64-23 Draft Report PDF icon 3. DOE Comments on: "Uniform Federal Policy for Quality

  11. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Council | Department of Energy Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby files its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) request for information on the communications needs of electric utilities and other such critical infrastructure industries (CII). The comments on the record- including those by APPA, EEI and NRECA, as well as API -

  12. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Company | Department of Energy Baltimore Gas & Electric Company NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company More Documents & Publications Comments of

  13. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Tacoma Public NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public Comments of Tacoma Public on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public More Documents & Publications Comments of Utilities Telecom Council Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies NBP RFI: Communications

  14. EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Meetings | Department of Energy Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping Meetings EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping Meetings Jordan Cove Liquefaction Project (Coos County, OR) and Pacific Connector Pipeline Project (Coos, Klamath, Jackson, and Douglas Counties, OR) FERC announces the extension of the public comment periond and additional scoping meetings. The comment period has been extended from September 4, 2012 to October 29, 2012. For more

  15. The EIS Comment-Response Process (DOE, 2004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS.

  16. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Cooperative- Minnesota | Department of Energy Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota More

  17. Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report. Final: Comments and Responses to Comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1999-02-01

    This document is the Comments and Responses to Comments volume of the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project (Final EIS/EIR). This volume of the Final EIS/EIR provides copies of the written comments received on the Draft EIS/EIR and the leady agency responses to those comments in conformance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

  18. Regulatory analysis technical evaluation handbook. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-01-01

    The purpose of this Handbook is to provide guidance to the regulatory analyst to promote preparation of quality regulatory analysis documents and to implement the policies of the Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG/BR-0058 Rev. 2). This Handbook expands upon policy concepts included in the NRC Guidelines and translates the six steps in preparing regulatory analyses into implementable methodologies for the analyst. It provides standardized methods of preparation and presentation of regulatory analyses, with the inclusion of input that will satisfy all backfit requirements and requirements of NRC`s Committee to Review Generic Requirements. Information on the objectives of the safety goal evaluation process and potential data sources for preparing a safety goal evaluation is also included. Consistent application of the methods provided here will result in more directly comparable analyses, thus aiding decision-makers in evaluating and comparing various regulatory actions. The handbook is being issued in loose-leaf format to facilitate revisions. NRC intends to periodically revise the handbook as new and improved guidance, data, and methods become available.

  19. Category:Regulatory Roadmap State Sections | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Regulatory Roadmap State Sections Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png Looking for the Regulatory Roadmap? Click here for a user-friendly list of Regulatory Roadmap pages. This...

  20. QER- Comment of America's Wetland Foundation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you for the opportunity to make oral remarks on behalf of the America¹s WETLAND Foundation in New Orleans on May 27, 2014 during the public comment period at the meeting held by the U.S. Department of Energy as the Secretariat for the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). In follow up, attached is a summation of those comments, along with three reports released by the Foundation for your review that will provide information helpful to the committee. Please do not hesitate to contact me if there are questions or if more information is desired, Sidney Coffee

  1. Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing | Department of Energy Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Docket No. EO-05-01: In accordance with Order No. 202-06-1, issued by the

  2. QER - Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Honda Motor Co., Inc. QER - Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc. From: Edward_Cohen@hna.honda.com Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:42 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting _&Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency,_8 Held April 11, 2014, Washington, D.C. filed by American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Attachment: QER Comments 6.10.2014.pdf Attached please find comments for the record for the Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting

  3. Sandia Energy - Policy and Regulatory, Codes and Standards

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Policy and Regulatory, Codes and Standards Home Stationary Power Energy Conversion Efficiency Solar Energy Photovoltaics Solar Market Transformation Policy and Regulatory, Codes...

  4. Effective Regulatory Institutions: The Regulator's Role in the...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Regulatory Institutions: The Regulator's Role in the Policy Process, Including Issues of Regulatory Independence Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name:...

  5. Category:Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Sections | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Sections Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png Looking for the Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap? Click here for a user-friendly list of Geothermal...

  6. Category:Regulatory Roadmap Federal Sections | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Category Edit History Category:Regulatory Roadmap Federal Sections Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png Looking for the Regulatory...

  7. Energy Department Develops Regulatory Roadmap to Spur Geothermal...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Develops Regulatory Roadmap to Spur Geothermal Energy Development Energy Department Develops Regulatory Roadmap to Spur Geothermal Energy Development June 5, 2013 - 1:19pm Addthis ...

  8. Category:Regulatory Roadmap Flowcharts | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    flowcharts Subcategories This category has the following 2 subcategories, out of 2 total. G Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Flowcharts S Solar Regulatory Roadmap...

  9. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) -List of Covered Electric Utilities - 2006 Public Utility Regulatory...

  10. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) as Applicable to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) - List of Covered Electric Utilities. Public Utility Regulatory...

  11. Energy Department Develops Regulatory Roadmap to Spur Geothermal Energy Development

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Energy Department today issued a Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap that will help developers navigate regulatory requirements at every level of government to deploy geothermal energy projects.

  12. Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory Test Exercise...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory Test Exercise: Output Report Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage Regulatory...

  13. 7/24/2014 DOE Natural Gas Regulatory...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    42014 DOE Natural Gas Regulatory E-filing Application https:app.fossil.energy.govappfergasApplicationAction.go 12 Basic Information Natural Gas Regulatory E-filing...

  14. General Renewable Energy-Policy and Regulatory Studies | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    and Regulatory Studies Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: General Renewable Energy-Policy and Regulatory Studies AgencyCompany Organization: World Bank...

  15. Washington Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit Regulatory...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Air Quality Notice of Construction Permit Regulatory Handbook Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook:...

  16. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act Information

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA) OSDBU is a resource for small businesses seeking information concerning the rules and regulations regarding all federal agencies and their relationships with the small business community.

  17. QER- Comment of Don Ogden

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force and Energy Policy Systems Analysis Staff: We are unable to attend today's public meeting in Hartford, CT. With only four working days advanced notice of this event we find it difficult to believe that any real effort has been made on your part to reach out to the public for their input. Be that as it may, we want to take this opportunity to comment on the very subject of this meeting. The only true energy related "Infrastructure constraints" we are aware of here in New England are those experienced by corporate entities who seek to export our precious resources to other nations for profit. This, of course, is not at all in the public's interest. Certainly you recall all the efforts our goverment put into establishing "Energy Independence"? That phrase has, and continues to be the watchword heard throughout our nation. Why now, when so-called "Energy Independence" has yet to be established, would we choose to enable private corporations to export gas and oil to other countries at our expense? Further, why is it that corporations and their supporters in government are not actively seeking to repair the massive and dangerous leaks in our existing pipelines? How can corporations and government agencies who reportedly oversee energy corporations even consider building new pipelines when the existing ones are in so need of repair? With this in mind, the only "constraints" we are aware of are the lack of constraints on energy corporations run amok, forever seeking more profits at the expense of the public good. Please recall your mission: "The mission of the Energy Department is to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions." Such security is only possible if we plan ahead for future generations in the midst of the Climate Crisis. Selling off our energy resources to other nations until they are depleted is not in keeping with that mission. Allowing existing energy infrastructure to leak methane and other elements into our compromised atmosphere is not in keeping with that mission. Let's have some of those "transformative solutions", let's put every effort into limiting gas & oil leaks and keeping our energy resources here at home. Don Ogden, producer/co-host The Enviro Show WXOJ-LP & WMCB

  18. QER- Comment of American Water

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear QER Team; Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments to the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force to discuss the water and energy nexus, advances in water innovative technologies, and the impact of climate change on water issues. On behalf of American Water, I wish to submit the following White Papers which we have prepared on these critical issues: Innovations in Energy Use Sustainability and Resiliency Planning for Water Utilities One Water Water/Energy Correlation The Value of Water Challenges in the Water Industry: Climate Change Challenges in the Water Industry: Meeting Demand in the West Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Desalination Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Going Green Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Water Reuse Bridging the Water Innovation Gap. Founded in 1886, American Water is the largest publicly traded U.S. water and wastewater utility company. With headquarters in Voorhees, NJ, the company employs approximately 6,600 dedicated professionals who provide drinking water, wastewater and other related services to an estimated 14 million people in more than 40 states. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if there is any way American Water can be helpful to your mission. Respectfully Yours, Martin (See attached file: White Papers.pdf) Martin D. Kerckhoff Vice President and Divisional General Counsel Central Division American Water CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION This email and any attachments hereto constitute a legally confidential communication from the Legal Department of American Water. The information contained herein is subject to attorney-client privilege and is for the sole use of the intended original addressee. If you are not the intended original addressee, you are hereby notified that any reading, disclosure, copying, distribution, use, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us at 314.966.2241 and delete this message from your system. WARNING: Although American Water has taken reasonable precautions to ensure that no viruses are present in this email, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free. No responsibility is accepted by American Water for any loss or damage arising in any way from the receipt and/or use of this email.

  19. Portsmouth Site Regulatory Agreements | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Site Regulatory Agreements Portsmouth Site Regulatory Agreements PDF icon Portsmouth Administrative Consent Order - 1997 PDF icon Portsmouth Ohio Consent Decree - 1989 PDF icon Portsmouth Removal Action and Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study and Remedial Design and Remedial Action (D&D Orders) Project Director's Final Findings and Order, Mods. 2011, 2012 PDF icon Portsmouth Integration Director's Final Findings and Order - 2011 PDF icon Portsmouth DUF6 Director's Final Findings and

  20. EVALUATION REPORT The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Unclassified Cybersecurity Program - 2014 OAS-L-15-03 November 2014 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 3, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Daniel M. Weeber Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Administration Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Evaluation Report on "The Federal