National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for refrigeration proposed penalty

  1. Everest Refrigeration: Proposed Penalty (2015-SE-42001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Bu Sung America Corporation (dba Everest Refrigeration) manufactured and distributed noncompliant commercial refrigeration equipment model ESGR3 in the U.S.

  2. International Refrigeration: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1510)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that International Refrigeration Products failed to certify a various room air conditioners as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. Cospolich Refrigerator: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5314)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Cospolich Refrigerator Co, Inc. failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  4. Refrigerator Manufacturers: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5341)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Refrigerator Manufacturers, LLC failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  5. Commercial Refrigerator Door: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5351)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Commercial Refrigerator Door Company, Inc. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  6. Duracold Refrigeration Manufacturing: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5342)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Duracold Refrigeration Manufacturing Company, LLC failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  7. North Star Refrigerator: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5355)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that North Star Refrigerator Co., Inc. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  8. Perlick: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-14002)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Perlick Corporation manufactured and distributed noncompliant refrigerator basic model HP48RR in the U.S.

  9. Danby Products: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1415)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Danby Products, Inc. failed to certify refrigerators and freezers as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  10. Almo: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1416)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Almo Corporation failed to certify residential refrigerators as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  11. Whirlpool: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-1420)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Whirlpool Corporation manufactured and distributed noncompliant refrigerator-freezers in the U.S.

  12. Acme Kitchenettes: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1406)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Acme Kitchenettes Corp. failed to certify a variety of refrigerators as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. Smeg: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23003)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Smeg USA Inc. failed to certify various basic models of refrigerators/refrigerator-freezers/freezers, dishwashers, and cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  14. Sanyo Electric: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1210)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Sanyo Electric Co. failed to certify a variety of refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  15. Nostalgia Products: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-14017)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Nostalgia Products Group, LLC failed to certify a variety of consumer refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  16. Absocold: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1212)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Absocold Corporation failed to certify a variety of residential refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  17. Hisense USA: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1211)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Hisense USA Corp. failed to certify a variety of residential refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  18. Victory: Proposed Penalty (2015-SE-42033) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Proposed Penalty (2015-SE-42033) Victory: Proposed Penalty (2015-SE-42033) September 25, 2015 DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Victory Refrigeration manufactured and distributed noncompliant commercial refrigerator-freezer model RFS-1D-S1-EW-PT-HD in the U.S. Federal law subjects manufacturers and private labelers to civil penalties if those parties distribute in the U.S. products that do not meet applicable energy conservation standards. This civil penalty notice advises

  19. Bu Sung: Proposed Penalty (2015-SE-42007) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Proposed Penalty (2015-SE-42007) Bu Sung: Proposed Penalty (2015-SE-42007) September 29, 2015 DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Bu Sung America Corporation d/b/a Everest Refrigeration manufactured and distributed noncompliant commercial refrigerator-freezers in the U.S. Federal law subjects manufacturers and private labelers to civil penalties if those parties distribute in the U.S. products that do not meet applicable energy conservation standards. This civil penalty notice

  20. LG: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-14022)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that LG Electronics USA, Inc. failed to certify various refrigerator-freezer basic models as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  1. Distinctive Appliances: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-14019)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Distinctive Appliances Distributing, Inc. failed to certify various Fhiaba-brand refrigerator-freezers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  2. Aucma Group: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1405)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Aucma Group (aka Qingdao Aucma Import and Export Co., Ltd.) failed to certify a variety of residential refrigerators and freezers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. Legacy: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-14025)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that The Legacy Companies failed to certify refrigerator Maxx Ice-brand basic model MCR3U as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  4. Fagor America: Proposed Penalty (2013-CEW-19001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Fagor America, Inc. failed to certify a variety of residential refrigerator-freezers and dishwashers as compliant with the applicable energy and water conservation standards.

  5. AHT: Proposed Penalty (2015-SE-42031)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that AHT Cooling Systems, Inc. manufactured and distributed noncompliant commercial refrigeration equipment model RIO S 68 L F in the U.S.

  6. Cal Flame: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-14015)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Cal Flame failed to certify refrigerator basic model BBQ09849P-H as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  7. Crane: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-52001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Crane Merchandising Systems failed to certify certain models of refrigerated bottled or canned beverage vending machines as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  8. Traulsen: Proposed Penalty (2015-SE-42002)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Traulsen – ITW Food Group, LLC manufactured and distributed noncompliant commercial refrigerator-freezer model RDT132DUT-HHS in the U.S.

  9. Versonel: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-21009)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Smart Surplus, Inc. d/b/a Versonel failed to certify refrigerators and residential clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  10. Electrolux: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-14020)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Electrolux North America, Inc. failed to certify various refrigerator-freezers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  11. Living Direct: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1904)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Living Direct, Inc. failed to certify a variety of dishwashers, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  12. Curtis: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-14021)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Curtis International, Ltd. failed to certify the Igloo-brand refrigerator-freezer basic model FR9211 as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. Utility: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-42007) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-42007) Utility: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-42007) November 30, 2015 DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Utility Refrigerator failed to certify certain commercial refrigerator equipment as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE regulations require a manufacturer (which includes importers) to submit reports certifying that its products have been tested and meet the applicable energy conservation standards. This civil penalty

  14. Elmira Stove Works: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1407)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Elmira Stove Works failed to certify refrigerator-freezers as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  15. Sanden Vendo America: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-52002)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Sanden Vendo America Inc. manufactured and distributed noncompliant Class A refrigerated bottled or canned beverage vending machine model Vue30 (with 1128127 cassette refrigeration deck) in the U.S.

  16. DOE Resolves Avanti Refrigerator and Freezer Civil Penalty Case

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Today, the Department of Energy announced that it has resolved the civil penalty action against Mackle Company for its failure to certify that refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers sold under the...

  17. Smeg USA: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-14/1909)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Smeg USA, Inc. failed to certify a variety of dishwashers and refrigerators as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  18. Bull Outdoor Products: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-14014)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Bull Outdoor Products, Inc. failed to certify refrigerator basic model BC-130 as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  19. Fagor America: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-14/1908)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Fagor America, Inc. failed to certify a variety of refrigerators and dishwashers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  20. Minibar North America: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-14010)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Minibar North America, Inc. failed to certify a variety of refrigerators as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  1. Midea: Proposed Penalty (2010-SE-0110, 2012-SE-1402, 2012-SE-1404)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Midea America Corp., Hefei Hualing Co., Ltd., and China Refrigeration Industry Co., Ltd. manufactured and distributed noncompliant refrigerator-freezers and freezers in the U.S.

  2. Atosa: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-42037) | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Atosa: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-42037) (15.43 KB) More Documents & Publications Atosa: Order (2015-CE-42037) Utility: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-42007) Crane: Proposed Penalty ...

  3. RPI: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-42065) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RPI: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-42065) (16.14 KB) More Documents & Publications RPI: Order (2015-CE-42065) Utility: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-42007) Crane: Proposed Penalty ...

  4. Universal: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-26004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Universal Lighting Technologies, Inc. manufactured and distributed noncompliant fluorescent lamp ballasts in the U.S.

  5. Wolverine Brass: Proposed Penalty (2015-CW-28004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Wolverine Brass, Inc. failed to certify certain faucets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  6. Allen Co: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-0715)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Allen Co. failed to certify a variety of faucets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  7. Royal Centurion: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-3608)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Royal Centurion, Inc., failed to certify two dehumidifiers as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  8. Capital Cooking: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23008)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Capital Cooking Equipment, Inc. failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  9. Duro Corporation: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23009)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Duro Corporation failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  10. Maxlite: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-27018)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Maxlite, Inc. failed to certify general service fluorescent lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  11. DHI: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that DHI Corp. failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  12. Nicor: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32016)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Nicor, Inc. failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. Hydac: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-4107)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Hydac Technology Corporation manufactured and distributed noncompliant electric motors in the U.S.

  14. ET Industries: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-2902)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that ET Industries, Inc. manufactured and distributed noncompliant showerheads in the U.S.

  15. Sunpentown: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1505)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Sunpentown International Inc. failed to certify dehumidifiers as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  16. Hudson Reed: Proposed Penalty (2011-SW-2909)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Hudson Reed, Ltd. manufactured and distributed noncompliant showerheads in the U.S.

  17. Quietside Corp: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1710)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Quietside Corporation failed to certify a variety of water heaters as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  18. Averen: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-0711)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Averen, Inc. failed to certify a variety of faucets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  19. Morris: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-5403)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Morris Products, Inc. manufactured and distributed noncompliant metal halide lamp fixtures in the U.S.

  20. Paragon Sales: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1417)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Paragon Sales Co., Inc., failed to certify certain Liebherr residential freezers as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  1. Lutron Electronics: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-3796)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. manufactured and distributed noncompliant class A external power supplies in the U.S.

  2. American Range: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23006)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that American Range Corporation failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. Viking Range: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23014)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Viking Range, LLC failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  4. CE: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-1429)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that CE North America, LLC, privately labeled and distributed noncompliant freezers in the U.S.

  5. Sears: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-3606)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Sears, Roebuck & Co. failed to certify two dehumidifiers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  6. ETL: Proposed Penalty (2015-CW-29003)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that ETL, LLC failed to certify certain showerheads as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  7. Electrolux: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23015)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Electrolux North America, Inc. failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  8. Heat Controller: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-15004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Heat Controller, Inc. privately labeled and distributed noncompliant room air conditioners in the U.S.

  9. Philips: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-48006)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Philips Lighting North America Corp. manufactured and distributed noncompliant illuminated exit signs in the U.S.

  10. Electrolux: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1901)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Electrolux failed to certify a certain dishwasher as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  11. Whirlpool: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-21010)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Whirlpool Corporation failed to certify residential clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  12. Basement Systems: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-2110)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Basement Systems, Inc. failed to certify a variety of dehumidifier as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. Haier: Proposed Penalty (2011-SE-1408)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Haier America Trading, L.L.C. privately labeled and distributed noncompliant freezers in the U.S.

  14. Danco: Proposed Penalty (2015-CW-28006)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Danco, Inc. failed to certify a variety of faucets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  15. Eurodib: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-45001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Eurodib Inc. failed to certify automatic commercial ice makers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  16. American Valve: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-1411)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that American Valve, Inc. failed to certify a variety of showerheads as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  17. Distinctive Appliances: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23020)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Distinctive Appliances Distributing Inc. failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  18. Kohler: Proposed Penalty (2014-CW-30003)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Kohler Co. failed to certify a variety of water closets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  19. Amerisink: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-0710)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Amerisink, Inc. failed to certify a variety of faucets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  20. Perlick: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-14001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Perlick Corporation manufactured and distributed noncompliant freezer basic model HP24F in the U.S.

  1. Harrington: Proposed Penalty (2014-SW-28011)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Harrington Brass Works manufactured and distributed noncompliant faucets in the U.S.

  2. Ramblewood Green: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23017)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Ramblewood Green Ltd. failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. Dacor: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23010)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Dacor failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  4. Fisher & Paykel: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23012)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Fisher & Paykel Appliances, Inc. failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  5. Barron: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-5402)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Barron Lighting Group, Inc. manufactured and distributed various noncompliant metal halide lamp fixtures in the U.S.

  6. GE Appliances: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-2113)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that General Electric Appliances failed to certify a variety of dehumidifiers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  7. Engineered Solutions: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-2112)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Engineered Solutions, Inc. failed to certify a dehumidifier as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  8. School Air: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-43004) | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    School Air: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-43004) (15.74 KB) More Documents & Publications School Air: Order (2016-CE-43004) Temspec: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-43002) Crane: Proposed ...

  9. Imperial Manufacturing: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5322)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Imperial Manufacturing, Inc. failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  10. Thermo Products: Proposed Penalty (2011-SE-1603)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued this Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty Notice to Thermo Products, LLC, alleging that the company certified several models of residential air conditioning heat pumps without performing testing required by DOE regulations.

  11. Maxx: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-4506)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Maxx Cold Food Service manufactured and distributed a noncompliant Maxx Ice brand automatic commercial ice maker basic model MIM450 in the U.S.

  12. Satco: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-2702)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Satco Products, Inc. failed to certify a variety of general service fluorescent lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. Neptun Light: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-3504)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Neptun Light, Inc. failed to certify a variety of medium base compact fluorescent lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  14. Royal Pacific: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-33004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Royal Pacific, Ltd. failed to certify ceiling fans, ceiling fan light kits, medium base compact fluorescent lamps, and illuminated exit signs as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  15. Hunter Fan: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32008)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Hunter Fan Company failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  16. LG: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-15011)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that LG Electronics USA, Inc. manufactured and distributed noncompliant room air conditioner basic model LT143CNR in the U.S.

  17. PQL: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-27001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that P.Q.L., Inc. failed to certify various basic models of medium base compact fluorescent lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  18. MC Appliance: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-20002)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that MC Appliance Corporation failed to certify residential clothes washers and residential clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  19. Sylvane: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-36005)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Sylvane, Inc. failed to certify at least two dehumidifier basic models as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  20. Vaxcel: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32006)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Vaxcel International Co., Ltd. failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  1. Yosemite: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32015)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Northern Central Distributing, Inc. d/b/a Yosemite Home Décor failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  2. Keystone: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-2601)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Keystone Technologies, LLC failed to certify a variety of fluorescent lamp ballasts as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. Fagor America: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23018)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Fagor America, Inc. failed to certify various basic models of cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  4. Manitowoc Foodservice: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-5309)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Manitowoc Foodservice failed to certify various walk-in coolers and freezers (WICFs) and their components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  5. Amerikooler: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5307)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Amerikooler, Inc. failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer (WICF) components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  6. Aircooler: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5338)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Aircooler Corporation failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  7. American Standard: Proposed Penalty (2013-CW-3001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that AS America, Inc., d/b/a American Standard Brands failed to certify a variety of water closets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  8. Leer: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5325)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Leer, Inc. failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  9. Hayward Industries: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1110)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Hayward Industries, Inc. failed to certify a variety of pool heaters as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  10. Golden Cooler: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5345)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Golden Cooler failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  11. Goodman Manufacturing: Proposed Penalty (2011-SE-4301)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Goodman Manufacturing manufactured and distributed noncompliant basic model CPC180* commercial package air conditioners in the U.S.

  12. Goodman: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1509)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P., failed to certify a various room air conditioners as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. Avanti: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-2105)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Avanti Products, LLC, failed to certify a variety of residential clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  14. Watermark: Proposed Penalty (2011-SW-2908)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Watermark Designs, Ltd. manufactured and distributed noncompliant showerhead basic model SH-FAL90 in the U.S.

  15. Golden Opportunity: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-20003)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Golden Opportunity, Inc. failed to certify room air conditioners, central air conditioners/heat pumps, and residential clothes washers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  16. Hicon: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-1426)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Ningbo Hicon International Industry Company, Ltd. manufactured and distributed noncompliant freezer basic model BD-200 in the U.S.

  17. Navien America: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1712)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Navien America, Inc. failed to certify a variety of water heaters as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  18. Lumiram Electric: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1014)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Lumiram Electric Corporation failed to certify a variety of incandescent reflector lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  19. American Power: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-0911)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that American Power Solutions, Inc. failed to certify a general service fluorescent lamp as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  20. Stiebel Eltron: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1711)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Stiebel Eltron, Inc. failed to certify a variety of water heaters as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  1. Mackle Company: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-2102)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that The Mackle Company, Inc. failed to certify a variety of residential clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  2. Trastar: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-49003)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Trastar Inc. failed to certify a variety of basic models of traffic signal modules and pedestrian models as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. Heat Controller: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1507)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Heat Controller, Inc. failed to certify a variety of room air conditioners as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  4. Jamison Door: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5348)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Jamison Door Company failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  5. Kichler: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32007)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that The L.D. Kiebler Co. d/b/a Kichler Lighting failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  6. MC Appliance: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-1508)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that CNA International Inc. d/b/a MC Appliance Corporation failed to certify a variety of room air conditioners as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  7. Matthews Fan: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32012)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Matthews-Gerbar, Ltd. d/b/a Matthews Fan Company failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  8. Emerson: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-54001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Emerson Electric Co. failed to certify a variety of metal halide lamp fixtures as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  9. Winix: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-3607)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Cloud 9 Marketing, Inc. d/b/a Winix, Inc. failed to certify dehumidifiers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  10. Daewoo: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-0410)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Daewoo International Inc. failed to certify a variety of residential clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  11. Central Moloney: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-4702)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Central Moloney, Inc. manufactured and distributed a variety of noncompliant liquid-immersed distribution transformers in the U.S.

  12. Anthony International: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5357)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Anthony International failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. Haier: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-2104)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Haier America Trading LLC failed to certify various residential clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  14. Quorum: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32013)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Davoil, Inc. d/b/a Quorum International, Inc. failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  15. Barclay Products: Proposed Penalty (2013-CW-3005)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Barclay Products, Ltd. failed to certify a variety of water closets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  16. Philips: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-2605)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Philips Lighting Electronics N. A. manufactured and distributed noncompliant fluorescent lamp ballast basic model VEL-1S40-SC in the U.S.

  17. Midea: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-1505)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that GD Midea Air-Conditioning Equipment Co. Ltd. manufactured and distributed noncompliant room air conditioner basic model MWJ1-08ERN1-BI8 in the U.S.

  18. Volume International: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32014)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Volume International Corporation failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  19. Shandong Hongtai: Proposed Penalty (2016-SE-42010)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Shandong Hongtai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. manufactured and distributed noncompliant commercial freezer model TUC-27F in the U.S.

  20. Litex: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32011)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Litex Industries, Limited failed to certify a variety of celing fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  1. BSH: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-2001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that BSH Home Appliances Corp. failed to certify a variety of residential clothes washers as compliant with the applicable energy/water conservation standards.

  2. Leotek: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-4903)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Leotek Electronics USA Corp. failed to certify a variety of traffic signal modules and pedestrian modules as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. Excellence Opto: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-49002)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Excellence Opto, Inc. failed to certify a variety of traffic signal modules and pedestrian modules as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  4. Eaton Cooper: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-48003)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Eaton Cooper Lighting failed to certify a variety of illuminated exit sign models as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  5. Dade Engineering: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5316)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Dade Engineering Corp. failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  6. Barron: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-48004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Barron Lighting Group, Inc. failed to certify a variety of illuminated exit sign models as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  7. Southeast Cooler: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5331)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Southeast Cooler Corp. failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  8. Acuity: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-4802)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Acuity Brands Lighting failed to certify a variety of illuminated exit signs as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  9. USA Manufacturing: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5336)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that USA Manufacturing failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  10. Airwell Group: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1505)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Airwell Group failed to certify a variety of Fedders brand room air conditioners as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  11. Polar King: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5328)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Polar King International Inc. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  12. Commercial Cooler: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5343)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Commercial Cooler, Inc. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. AM Conservation: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-1415)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that AM Conservation Group, Inc. failed to certify a variety of showerheads as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  14. Home Depot: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32017)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that The Home Depot, Inc. failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  15. Penguin Toilets: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-1615)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Penguin Toilets, LLC failed to certify a variety of water closets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  16. Nationwide Industries: Proposed Penalty (2011-CW-2803)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Nationwide Industries, Inc. d/b/a Banner Faucets failed to certify a variety of faucets and showerheads as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  17. Artisan Manufacturing: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-0712)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Artisan Manufacturing Company, Inc. failed to certify a variety of faucets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  18. Watermark Designs: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-1404)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Watermark Designs Holdings, Ltd. d/b/a/ Watermark Designs, Ltd. failed to certify various showerheads as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  19. Mile High: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-4501)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Mile High Equipment, LLC manufactured and distributed noncompliant Ice-O-Matic brand automatic commercial ice maker basic model ICE2106 FW, HW in the U.S.

  20. Bigwall: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-15006)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Bigwall Enterprises, Inc. privately labeled and distributed noncompliant PerfectAire brand room air conditioner model PACH8000 in the U.S.

  1. Sunshine Lighting: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-54008)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Sunshine Lighting manufactured and distributed noncompliant metal halide lamp fixtures, Sunshine brand basic models 04937-SU and 04952-SU in the U.S.

  2. Northland: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23002)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Northland Corporation d/b/a AGA Marvel failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. AGA Marvel: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1905)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that AGA Marvel (also AGA Heartland and Northland Corp.) failed to certify a variety of dishwashers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  4. Midea America: Proposed Penalty (2014-SEW-20006)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Midea America Corp. imported and distributed in commerce noncompliant residential clothes washer basic model MAE80-S1702GPS in the U.S.

  5. CNA: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-1430)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that CNA International, Inc., d/b/a MC Appliance Corp. privately labeled and distributed noncompliant freezer Magic Chef model number HMCF7W in the U.S.

  6. Atlas Lighting: Proposed Penalty (2015-CE-48001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Atlas Lighting Products failed to certify a variety of illuminated exit sign basic models as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  7. Kold Pack: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5323)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Kold Pack, Inc. failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  8. Simkar: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-5408)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Simkar Corporation manufactured and distributed noncompliant probe-start and pulse-start basic model metal halide lamp fixtures in the U.S.

  9. Mackle Company: Proposed Penalty (2010-SE-0106) | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    June 14, 2010 DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that The Mackle Company, ... manufacturers and private labelers to civil penalties if those parties distribute in ...

  10. YMGI: Proposed Penalty (2011-SCE-1605)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty to YMGI Group, LLC, alleging YMGI (1) distributed in commerce noncompliant through-the-wall split system central air conditioner model TTWC-18K-31B; and (2) distributed in commerce residential central air conditioners without first certifying the models to DOE as compliant with applicable DOE energy conservation standards.

  11. Teddico: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-5409)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that The Electrical Design, Development and Implementation Company d/b/a Teddico manufactured and distributed noncompliant metal halide lamp fixtures with magnetic probe-start ballasts in the U.S.

  12. Topaz: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-35005)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Topaz Lighting Corp. failed to certify a variety of basic models of medium base compact fluorescent lamps, general service fluorescent lamps, and illuminated exit signs as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. PQL: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-27001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that P.Q.L., Inc. failed to certify various basic models of medium base compact fluorescent lamps, general service fluorescent lamps, fluorescent lamp ballasts, and illuminated exit signs as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  14. ELCO: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-54005)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that ELCO Lighting failed to certify various models of illuminated exit signs and metal halide lamp fixtures as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE also alleged that ELCO failed to provide test data upon request.

  15. Engineered Products: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-5401)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Engineered Products Company manufactured/privately-labeled and distributed a number of units of noncompliant basic model 15701, a metal halide lamp fixture with a magnetic probe-start ballast in the U.S.

  16. Midea: Proposed Penalty (2014-SW-20001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Hefei Rongshida Washing Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. ("Hefei Rongshida"), a subsidiary of Midea Group manufactured and distributed noncompliant model MAE80-S1702GPS residential clothes washer in the U.S.

  17. DOE Publishes Supplemental Proposed Determination for Miscellaneous Residential Refrigeration Products

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy has published a supplemental proposed determination regarding miscellaneous residential refrigeration products.

  18. Herbeau: Proposed Penalty (2015-CW-28005) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Proposed Penalty (2015-CW-28005) Herbeau: Proposed Penalty (2015-CW-28005) February 10, 2016 DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Herbeau Creations of America, Inc. failed to certify faucets and showerheads as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards. DOE regulations require a manufacturer (which includes importers) to submit reports certifying that its products have been tested and meet the applicable water conservation standards. This civil penalty notice

  19. Temspec: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-43002) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-43002) Temspec: Proposed Penalty (2016-CE-43002) February 5, 2016 DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Temspec Incorporated failed to certify various basic models of single package vertical air conditioning and heating equipment as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE regulations require a manufacturer (which includes importers) to submit reports certifying that its products have been tested and meet the applicable energy

  20. DOE Proposes Higher Efficiency Standards for Refrigerators | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Higher Efficiency Standards for Refrigerators DOE Proposes Higher Efficiency Standards for Refrigerators September 28, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu today announced the release of a new proposed energy efficiency standard for residential refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. The standard, as proposed, could save consumers as much as $18.6 billion over thirty years. The Obama Administration has made efficiency standards a major

  1. Hudson-Reed: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-1403)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Hudson-Reed Limited failed to certify its showerheads as compliant with the water conservation standards.

  2. BSH Home Appliances: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23013)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that BSH Home Appliances Corporation failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. Purcell-Murray: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23019)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Purcell-Murray Company, Inc., failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  4. K.Grill: Proposed Penalty (2011-SW-2902)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Kenneth Grill manufactured and distributed noncompliant showerheads in the U.S.

  5. Euro Chef USA: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Euro Chef USA Inc. failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  6. Peerless-Premier: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23007)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Peerless-Premier Appliance Co. failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  7. EZ-Flo International: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-1401)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that EZ-Flo International, Inc. failed to certify its showerheads as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  8. GE Lighting Solutions: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-4901)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that General Electric Lighting Solutions manufactured and distributed noncompliant traffic signal modules in the U.S.

  9. Proposed Methodology for LEED Baseline Refrigeration Modeling (Presentation)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Deru, M.

    2011-02-01

    This PowerPoint presentation summarizes a proposed methodology for LEED baseline refrigeration modeling. The presentation discusses why refrigeration modeling is important, the inputs of energy models, resources, reference building model cases, baseline model highlights, example savings calculations and results.

  10. Ingersoll-Rand: Proposed Penalty (2012-SE-1608)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Ingersoll-Rand manufactured and distributed a noncompliant basic model 2TTA0060A4000C central air conditioner in the U.S.

  11. DuraLamp USA: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-0912)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that DuraLamp USA, Inc. failed to certify a variety of general service fluorescent lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  12. Minka-Aire: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-32018)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Minka Lighting Inc. failed to certify a variety of ceiling fans as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. Prizer-Painter: Proposed Penalty (2014-CE-23005)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Prizer-Painter Stove Works, Inc. failed to certify cooking products as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  14. Mitsubishi Electric: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-01/0202)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. failed to certify residential central air conditioners and central air conditioning heat pumps as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  15. Aero-Tech: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1012)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Aero-Tech Light Bulb Co. failed to certify a variety of incandescent reflector lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  16. AeroSys: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-01/0201)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that AeroSys, Inc. failed to certify residential central air conditioners and air conditioning heat pumps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  17. National Comfort Products: Proposed Penalty (2010-SE-0307)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued this Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty Notice to National Comfort Products, alleging that the company certified several models of residential air conditioners without performing testing required by DOE regulations.

  18. Midea Washing Appliance: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-1903)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Midea Washing Appliances Mfg. Co., Ltd. failed to certify a variety of dishwashers as compliant with the applicable water and energy conservation standards.

  19. ASKO Appliances: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-04/0614)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that ASKO Appliances, Inc. failed to certify a variety of residential dishwashers and clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  20. Afeel: Proposed Penalty (2010-CW-07/1414)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Afeel Corporation failed to certify a variety of showerheads and faucets as compliant with the applicable water conservation standards.

  1. General Restaurant Equipment: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5344)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that General Restaurant Equipment Co. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  2. National Comfort Products: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-16014)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that National Comfort Products failed to certify space constrained central air conditioners and central air conditioning heat pumps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  3. Commercial Display Systems: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5350)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Commercial Display Systems, LLC failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  4. Westland Sales: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-03/0411)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Westland Sales failed to certify several models of residential clothes washers and clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  5. Kingspan Insulated Panels: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5353)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Kingspan Insulated Panels, Inc. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  6. Diversified Panels Systems: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5346)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Diversified Panels Systems, Inc. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  7. Innovative Concept Appliances: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-03/0415)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Innovative Concept Appliances, LLC, failed to certify a variety of residential clothes washers and clothes dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  8. Advance Energy Technologies: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5302)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Advance Energy Technologies, Inc. failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer (WICFs) components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  9. Commercial Cooling Par Engineering: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5312)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Commercial Cooling Par Engineering failed to certify walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  10. R-Cold: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5354)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that R-Cold, Inc. failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  11. American Cooler Technologies: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5305)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that American Cooler Technologies failed to certify walk-in coolers and freezer (WICF) components as compliant with the energy conservation standards.

  12. Metl-Span: Proposed Penalty (2013-CE-5352)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Metl-Span LLC failed to certify a variety of walk-in cooler or freezer components as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. HKC-US: Proposed Penalty (2013-SE-33002)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that HKC-US, LLC failed to certify a ceiling fan light kit as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  14. De'Longhi USA: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-2114)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that De'Longhi USA, Inc. failed to certify a variety of dehumidifiers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  15. EiKO: Proposed Penalty (2011-CE-2702)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that EiKO Ltd. - North America failed to certify a variety of incandescent reflector lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  16. Jandy Pool Products: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-1111)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Jandy Pool Products, Inc. failed to certify a variety of pool heaters as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  17. ASKO Appliances: Proposed Penalty (2012-CE-19/2004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that ASKO Appliances, Inc. failed to certify residential clothes washers and dishwashers as compliant with the applicable energy and water conservation standards.

  18. Felix Storch: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-03/04/0613)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Felix Storch, Inc. failed to certify a variety of residential dishwashers, clothes washers and dryers as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  19. Westinghouse Lighting: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-09/1001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Westinghouse Lighting Corporation failed to certify various flourescent and incandescent reflector lamps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  20. Nordyne: Proposed Penalty (2010-CE-01/0210)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Nordyne, LLC d/b/a Garrison Heating and Cooling Products failed to certify various residential central air conditioners and central air conditioning heat pumps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  1. DOE Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Test Procedure

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy has published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding test procedures for commercial refrigeration equipment.

  2. AeroSys: Proposed Penalty (2011-SCE-1624) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Proposed Penalty (2011-SCE-1624) AeroSys: Proposed Penalty (2011-SCE-1624) September 30, 2013 DOE alleged in an Amended Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty (NPCP) that AeroSys, Inc. failed to certify various basic models of space-constrained central air conditioners and air conditioning heat pumps as compliant with the applicable energy conservation standards. DOE also alleged in the NPCP that AeroSys, Inc. manufactured and distributed in the U.S. noncompliant space-constrained central air

  3. DOE Collects Civil Penalties for Failure to Certify Consumer Refrigeration Products

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Enforcement recently resolved enforcement actions against seven companies that failed to submit required reports to certify that their refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and/or freezers comply with federal energy conservation standards.

  4. ISSUANCE 2015-07-30: Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

  5. DOE Collects Civil Penalties for Failure to Certify Commercial Refrigeration Equipment

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE recently resolved enforcement actions against two companies that failed to certify that their commercial refrigeration equipment complies with federal energy conservation standards.

  6. SpacePak: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-16012) | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    SpacePak: Proposed Penalty (2014-SE-16012) (19.1 KB) More Documents & Publications SpacePak: Noncompliance Determination (2014-SE-16012) SpacePak: Order (2014-SE-16012) Crane: ...

  7. DOE Initiates Enforcement Proceedings against Westinghouse and Mitsubishi for Failure to Certify (Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty Issued)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of General Counsel has issued Notices of Proposed Civil Penalty to Westinghouse Lighting Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. for failing to certify that...

  8. Potential of the tractor-trailer and container segments as entry markets for a proposed refrigeration technology

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, S.A.; Davis, L.J.; Garrett, B.A.

    1987-05-01

    The refrigerated trailer and container segments of the transportation industry are evaluated as potential entry markets for a proposed absorption refrigeration technology. To perform this analysis the existing transportation refrigeration industry is characterized; this includes a description of the current refrigeration technology, rating systems, equipment manufacturers, maintenance requirements, and sales trends. This information indicates that the current transportation refrigeration industry is composed of two major competitors, Thermo King and Carrier. In addition, it has low profit potential, some barriers to entry and low growth potential. Data are also presented that characterize the transportation refrigeration consumers, specifically, major groups, market segmentation, consumer decision process, and buying criteria. This consumer information indicates that the majority of refrigerated trailer consumers are private carriers, and that the majority of refrigerated container consumers are shipping companies. Also, these consumers are primarily interested in buying reliable equipment at a low price, and are quite satisfied with existing refrigeration equipment.

  9. Air-Con International: Noncompliance Determination and Proposed Penalty (2010-SE-0301)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Air-Con International finding that a variety of central air conditioners and air conditioning heat pumps distributed under the Air-Con private label do not comport with the energy conservation standards. DOE also alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Air-Con imported and distributed the noncompliant products in the U.S.

  10. Preliminary Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty $55,000

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    November 18, 2004 Dr. Jeffrey Wadsworth, [ ] Oak Ridge National Laboratory UT-Battelle, LLC P.O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6255 EA-2004-09 Subject: Preliminary Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty $55,000 Dear Dr. Wadsworth: This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement's recent investigation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the October 6, 2003, Building [ ] Hot Cell (HC) 1 Radiological Spill event. An

  11. ISSUANCE 2016-02-26: Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products and Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Supplemental Proposed Determination of Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products as Covered Products

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products and Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Supplemental Proposed Determination of Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products as Covered Products

  12. Refrigerator Manufacturers: Order (2013-CE-5341)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE ordered Refrigerator Manufacturers, LLC to pay a $8,000 civil penalty after finding Refrigerator Manufacturers had failed to certify that certain models of walk-in cooler and freezer components comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  13. Cospolich Refrigerator: Order (2013-CE-5314)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE ordered Cospolich Refrigerator Co, Inc. to pay a $8,000 civil penalty after finding Cospolich Refrigerator had failed to certify that certain models of walk-in cooler and freezer components comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  14. International Refrigeration: Order (2012-CE-1510)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE ordered International Refrigeration Products to pay an $8,000 civil penalty after finding International Refrigeration had failed to certify that certain room air conditioners comply with the applicable energy conservation standard.

  15. DOE Reaches Settlements with Three Commercial Refrigeration Equipment...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    As a part of the settlement, Victory Refrigeration paid a civil penalty of 1,600 after manufacturing and distributing 8 units of commercial refrigerator-freezer model RFS-1D-S1-EW...

  16. Civil Penalties for Energy Conservation Standards Program Violations...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    More Documents & Publications Air-Con International: Noncompliance Determination and Proposed Penalty (2010-SE-0301) AeroSys: Proposed Penalty (2011-SCE-1624) Goodman ...

  17. 2014-02-07 Issuance: Certification of Commercial Heating, Ventilation, and Air-conditioning, Water Heating, and Refrigeration Equipment; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This document is a pre-publication Federal Register notice of proposed rulemaking regarding certification of commercial heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning, water-heating, and refrigeration equipment, as issued by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency on February 7, 2014.

  18. Commercial Refrigerator Door: Order (2013-CE-5351)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE ordered Commercial Refrigerator Door Company, Inc. to pay a $8,000 civil penalty after finding Commercial Refrigerator Door had failed to certify that a variety of models of walk-in cooler and freezer components comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  19. Duracold Refrigeration Manufacturing: Order (2013-CE-5342)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE ordered Duracold Refrigeration Manufacturing Company, LLC to pay a $8,000 civil penalty after finding Duracold Refrigeration Manufacturing had failed to certify that certain models of walk-in cooler and freezer components comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  20. North Star Refrigerator: Order (2013-CE-5355)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE ordered North Star Refrigerator Co., Inc. to pay a $8,000 civil penalty after finding North Star Refrigerator had failed to certify that any basic models of walk-in cooler and freezer components comply with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  1. Everest Refrigeration: Order (2015-SE-42001)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE ordered Bu Sung America Corporation (dba Everest Refrigeration) to pay a $12,080 civil penalty after finding Bu Sung had manufactured and distributed in commerce in the U.S. at least 64 units of noncompliant commercial refrigerator basic model ESGR3.

  2. Midea: Penalty Notice Withdrawal (2010-SE-0110)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE withdrew its January 26, 2012 Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty, but retained the right to take further enforcement actions.

  3. Malone refrigeration

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Swift, G.W.

    1993-01-01

    Malone refrigeration is the use of a liquid near its critical points without evaporations as working fluid in a regenerative or recuperative refrigeration cycle such as the Stirling and Brayton cycles. It's potential advantages include compactness, efficiency, an environmentally benign working fluid, and reasonable cost. One Malone refrigerator has been built and studied; two more are under construction. Malone refrigeration is such a new, relatively unexplored technology that the potential for inventions leading to improvements in efficiency and simplicity is very high.

  4. 2014-11-26 Issuance: Test Procedures for Miscellaneous Refrigeration...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    6 Issuance: Test Procedures for Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 2014-11-26 Issuance: Test Procedures for Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products; ...

  5. 2014-08-01 Issuance: Test Procedure for Refrigerated Bottled...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Test Procedure for Refrigerated Bottled or Canned Beverage Vending Machines; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and public meeting 2014-08-01 Issuance: Test Procedure for Refrigerated ...

  6. Malone refrigeration

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Swift, G W

    1992-01-01

    Malone refrigeration is the use of a liquid near its critical point, without evaporation, as working fluid in a refrigeration cycle such as the Stirling cycle. We discuss relevant properties of appropriate liquids, and describe two Malone refrigerators. The first completed several years ago, established the basic principles of use of liquids in such cycles. The second, now under construction, is a linear, free-piston machine.

  7. Malone refrigeration

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Swift, G.W.

    1993-06-01

    Malone refrigeration is the use of a liquid near its critical points without evaporations as working fluid in a regenerative or recuperative refrigeration cycle such as the Stirling and Brayton cycles. It`s potential advantages include compactness, efficiency, an environmentally benign working fluid, and reasonable cost. One Malone refrigerator has been built and studied; two more are under construction. Malone refrigeration is such a new, relatively unexplored technology that the potential for inventions leading to improvements in efficiency and simplicity is very high.

  8. Thermoacoustic refrigeration

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Garrett, S.L.; Hofler, T.J. )

    1992-12-01

    Shortly after their introduction, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) used as working fluids in a vapor compression (Rankine) refrigeration cycle became dominant in almost all small and medium-scale food refrigerator/freezer and building/residential air-conditioning applications. That situation is about to change dramatically and, at this moment, unpredictably. Two recent events are responsible for the new era in refrigeration that will dawn before the beginning of the 21st Century. The most significant of these is the international ban on the production of CFCs which were found to be destroying the Earth's protective ozone layer. The second event was the discovery of high temperature superconductors and the development of high speed and high density electronic circuits that require active cooling. It is the purpose of this article to introduce an entirely new approach to refrigeration that was first discovered in the early 1980s. This new approach-thermoacoustic refrigeration-uses high intensity sound waves to pump heat, with inert gases as the working fluid.

  9. Walk-in Cooler/Walk-in Freezer Refrigeration Systems- Enforcement Policy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE will not seek civil penalties or injunctive relief concerning violations of certain energy conservation standards applicable to refrigeration systems of walk-in coolers/walk-in freezers.

  10. Fluorescent refrigeration

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Epstein, Richard I.; Edwards, Bradley C.; Buchwald, Melvin I.; Gosnell, Timothy R.

    1995-01-01

    Fluorescent refrigeration is based on selective radiative pumping, using substantially monochromatic radiation, of quantum excitations which are then endothermically redistributed to higher energies. Ultimately, the populated energy levels radiatively deexcite emitting, on the average, more radiant energy than was initially absorbed. The material utilized to accomplish the cooling must have dimensions such that the exciting radiation is strongly absorbed, but the fluorescence may exit the material through a significantly smaller optical pathlength. Optical fibers and mirrored glasses and crystals provide this requirement.