Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Summary - Caustic Recovery Technology  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Caustic Recovery Technology Caustic Recovery Technology ETR Report Date: July 2007 ETR-7 United States Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) External Technical Review of Caustic Recovery Technology Why DOE-EM Did This Review The Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management Office (EM-21) has been developing caustic recovery technology for application to the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) to reduce the amount of Low Activity Waste (LAW) vitrified. Recycle of sodium hydroxide with an efficient caustic recovery process could reduce the amount of waste glass produced by greater than 30%. The Ceramatec Sodium (Na), Super fast Ionic CONductors (NaSICON) membrane has shown promise for directly producing 50% caustic with high sodium selectivity. The external review

2

Caustic Recovery Technology  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

366, REVISON 0 366, REVISON 0 Key Words: Waste Treatment Plant Sodium Recovery Electrochemical Retention: Permanent Review of Ceramatec's Caustic Recovery Technology W. R. Wilmarth D. T. Hobbs W. A. Averill E. B. Fox R. A. Peterson UNCLASSIFIED DOES NOT CONTAIN UNCLASSIFIED CONTROLLED NUCLEAR INFORMATION ADC & Reviewing Official:_______________________________________ (E. Stevens, Manager, Solid Waste and Special Programs) Date:______________________________________ JULY 20, 2007 Washington Savannah River Company Savannah River Site Aiken, SC 29808 Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy Under Contract Number DE-AC09-96SR18500 Page 1 of 28 WSRC-STI-2007-00366, REVISON 0 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared for the United States Department of Energy under

3

Vehicle Technologies Office: Recovery Act Funding Opportunities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recovery Act Funding Recovery Act Funding Opportunities to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Recovery Act Funding Opportunities on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: Recovery Act Funding Opportunities on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Recovery Act Funding Opportunities on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: Recovery Act Funding Opportunities on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: Recovery Act Funding Opportunities on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: Recovery Act Funding Opportunities on AddThis.com... Recovery Act Funding Opportunities President Barack Obama announced on March 19 that the DOE is offering up to $2.4 billion in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds to support next-generation plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) and their advanced

4

Low Level Heat Recovery Technology  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

With today's high fuel prices, energy conservation projects to utilize low level waste heat have become more attractive. Exxon Chemical Company Central Engineering has been developing guidelines and assessing the potential for application of low level heat recovery technology. This paper discusses heat distribution systems, latest developments in absorption refrigeration and organic Rankine cycles, and pressure, minimization possibilities. The relative merits and economics of the various possibilities and some guidelines on when they should be considered will be presented.

O'Brien, W. J.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

5

"Recovery Act: Advanced Energy Efficient BuildingTechnologies...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

"Recovery Act: Advanced Energy Efficient BuildingTechnologies" "Recovery Act: Advanced Energy Efficient BuildingTechnologies" Description of a FOA funding oppourtunity with funds...

6

Synchrophasor Technologies and their Deployment in the Recovery...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Synchrophasor Technologies and their Deployment in the Recovery Act Smart Grid Programs (August 2013) Synchrophasor Technologies and their Deployment in the Recovery Act Smart Grid...

7

Recovery Act - Geothermal Technologies Program:Ground Source...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recovery Act - Geothermal Technologies Program:Ground Source Heat Pumps Recovery Act - Geothermal Technologies Program:Ground Source Heat Pumps A detailled description of the...

8

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Act Act Pie chart diagram shows the breakdown of how cost-sharing funds related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act from industry participants, totaling $54 million (for a grand total of $96 million), are allocated within the Fuel Cell Technologies Office, updated September 2010. The diagram shows that $18.5 million is allocated to backup power, $9.7 million is allocated to lift truck, $7.6 million is allocated to portable power, $3.4 million is allocated to residential and commercial CHP, and $2.4 million is allocated to auxiliary power research. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) presents opportunities with potential for hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. Signed into law by President Obama on February 17, 2009, the Recovery Act is an unprecedented effort to jumpstart our economy, create or save millions of jobs, and put a down payment on addressing long-neglected challenges so our country can thrive in the twenty-first century.

9

Solar technology applications to enhanced oil recovery  

SciTech Connect

One possible near-term application for solar thermal technologies is the production of steam which could be pumped underground to increase the amount of petroleum which could be recovered from an oil field. This work compares 2 types of solar thermal technologies - solar troughs and central receivers - with conventional means of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) to determine, first, if solar technologies offer a viable EOR option and, second, how they compare with other steam-drive EOR alternatives. It analyzes these options from the technical, economic, institutional, and environmental perspectives. The work concludes that solar EOR is not an economically attractive alternative, largely due to existing technical uncertainties; possible environmental benefits do not appear to be a driving consideration; finally, tax incentives rather than government demonstration programs would seem to be the most effective means of encouraging solar EOR technology. 44 references.

Deleon, P.; Brown, K.C.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Recovery Act - Solid-State Lighting Core Technologies Funding...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Act - Solid-State Lighting Core Technologies Funding Opportunity Recovery Act - Solid-State Lighting Core Technologies Funding Opportunity A report detailling the Solid State...

11

Landfill gas recovery: a technology status report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Landfill gas, which consists mainly of methane and carbon dioxide, can be recovered and used as a fuel. Processing will upgrade it to a high-Btu gas of pipeline quality. There are more than a dozen commercial landfill-gas recovery facilities in the US at present, all at relatively large sites. The amount of gas produced by a given site is a function of size, composition, and age of the landfill. Various techniques can be used to enhance gas production and yield, including controlled addition of moisture and nutrients; bacterial seeding and pH control also appear useful. Several computer models have been developed to examine the effects of various parameters on gas production and yield; these can aid in predicting optimum gas recovery and in maintaining the proper chemical balance within the producing portion of the landfill. Economically, a site's viability depends on its location and potential users, current competing energy costs, and legislation governing the site's operation. Legal problems of site operation can occur because of environmental and safety issues, as well as from questions of gas ownership, liability, and public utility commission considerations. Currently, R and D is under way to improve present recovery techniques and to develop new technologies and concepts. Cost comparisons and potential environmental impacts are being examined. Additional research is needed in the areas of gas enhancement, decompositional analysis, computer modeling, gas characterization, instrumentation, and engineering cost analysis. 77 references, 11 figures, 23 tables.

Zimmermann, R.E.; Lytwynyshyn, G.R.; Wilkey, M.L.

1983-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

Solar technology application to enhanced oil recovery  

SciTech Connect

One proposed near-term commercial application for solar energy technology is the use of solar energy systems to generate steam for thermal enhanced oil recovery (EOR). This report examines four aspects of solar energy employed for steam EOR. First, six solar technologies are evaluated and two - parabolic troughs and central receivers - are selected for closer study; typical systems that would meet current production requirements are proposed and costed. Second, the legal and environmental issues attending solar EOR are analyzed. Third, the petroleum producing companies' preferences and requirements are discussed. Finally, alternative means of financing solar EOR are addressed. The study concludes that within the next four to five years, conventional (fossil-fueled) thermal EOR means are much less expensive and more available than solar EOR systems, even given environmental requirements. Within 10 to 15 years, assuming specified advances in solar technologies, central receiver EOR systems will be significantly more cost-effective than parabolic trough EOR systems and will be price competitive with conventional thermal EOR systems. Important uncertainties remain (both in solar energy technologies and in how they affect the operating characteristics of petroleum reservoirs) that need resolution before definitive projections can be made.

de Leon, P.; Brown, K.C.; Margolis, J.W.; Nasr, L.H.

1979-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

13

Solar technology application to enhanced oil recovery  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

One proposed near-term commercial application for solar energy technology is the use of solar energy systems to generate steam for thermal enhanced oil recovery (EOR). This report examines four aspects of solar energy employed for steam EOR. First, six solar technologies are evaluated and two - parabolic troughs and central receivers - are selected for closer study; typical systems that would meet current production requirements are proposed and costed. Second, the legal and environmental issues attending solar EOR are analyzed. Third, the petroleum producing companies' preferences and requirements are discussed. Finally, alternative means of financing solar EOR are addressed. The study concludes that within the next four to five years, conventional (fossil-fueled) thermal EOR means are much less expensive and more available than solar EOR systems, even given environmental requirements. Within 10 to 15 years, assuming specified advances in solar technologies, central receiver EOR systems will be significantly more cost-effective than parabolic trough EOR systems and will be price competitive with conventional thermal EOR systems. Important uncertainties remain (both in solar energy technologies and in how they affect the operating characteristics of petroleum reservoirs) that need resolution before definitive projections can be made.

de Leon, P.; Brown, K.C.; Margolis, J.W.; Nasr, L.H.

1979-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

14

Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Working Fluid Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Working Fluid Projects to someone by E-mail Working Fluid Projects to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Working Fluid Projects on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Working Fluid Projects on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Working Fluid Projects on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Working Fluid Projects on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Working Fluid Projects on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Working Fluid Projects on AddThis.com... About Take Action to Save Energy Partner with DOE Activities Appliances Research Building Envelope Research Windows, Skylights, & Doors Research Space Heating & Cooling Research

15

Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded HVAC Research Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HVAC Research Projects to someone by E-mail HVAC Research Projects to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded HVAC Research Projects on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded HVAC Research Projects on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded HVAC Research Projects on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded HVAC Research Projects on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded HVAC Research Projects on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded HVAC Research Projects on AddThis.com... About Take Action to Save Energy Partner with DOE Activities Appliances Research Building Envelope Research Windows, Skylights, & Doors Research Space Heating & Cooling Research

16

Vehicle Technologies Office: Materials for Energy Recovery Systems...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems and Controlling Exhaust Gases to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: Materials for Energy Recovery Systems and Controlling Exhaust Gases on Facebook...

17

NREL: Technology Deployment - Disaster Resiliency and Recovery  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

government, non-profits, and communities to address the energy-related considerations of disaster prevention and planning, response and recovery, and rebuilding. a woman leads a...

18

Generic Melt Circulation Technology for Metals Recovery  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Ideally, when such materials are smelted in isolation, excess energy should be available for recovery by steam-based electric power generation to satisfy...

19

Synchrophasor Technologies and their Deployment in the Recovery Act Smart  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Synchrophasor Technologies and their Deployment in the Recovery Act Synchrophasor Technologies and their Deployment in the Recovery Act Smart Grid Programs (August 2013) Synchrophasor Technologies and their Deployment in the Recovery Act Smart Grid Programs (August 2013) The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 provided $4.5 billion for the Smart Grid Investment Grant (SGIG), Smart Grid Demonstration Program (SGDP), and other DOE smart grid programs. These programs provided grants to the electric utility industry to deploy smart grid technologies to modernize the nation's electric grid. As a part of these programs, independent system operators, regional transmission organizations, and electric utilities installed synchrophasor and supporting technologies and systems in their electric power transmission systems.

20

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EERE Home | Programs & Offices | Consumer Information Fuel Cell Technologies Office Search Search Help Fuel Cell Technologies Office HOME...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Improved screen-bowl centrifuge recovery using polymer injection technology  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The paper reports the improved screen-bowl centrifuge recovery process using polymer injection technology. Field test and economic analysis are also included in the paper. 3 refs., 3 figs., 1 tab.

Burchett, R.T.; McGough, K.M.; Luttrell, G.H.

2006-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

22

NETL: Natural Gas Resources, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Deepwater Technology  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Natural Gas Projects and Natural Gas Projects Index of Research Project Summaries Use the links provided below to access detailed DOE/NETL project information, including project reports, contacts, and pertinent publications. Search Natural Gas and Oil Projects Current Projects Natural Gas Resources Shale Gas Environmental Other Natural Gas Resources Ehanced Oil Recovery CO2 EOR Environmental Other EOR & Oil Resources Deepwater Technology Offshore Architecture Safety & Environmental Other Deepwater Technology Methane Hydrates DOE/NETL Projects Completed Projects Completed Natural Gas Resources Completed Enhanced Oil Recovery Completed Deepwater Technology Completed E&P Technologies Completed Environmental Solutions Completed Methane Hydrates Completed Transmission & Distribution

23

Status of enhanced oil recovery technology  

SciTech Connect

The various enhanced oil recovery processes are discussed and classified into the following categories: (1) polymer waterflooding; (2) steam processes; (3) miscible gas (CO/sub 2/) processes; (4) surfactant flooding; and (5) in-situ combustion. Polymer flooding alone is of limited applicability and production from polymer projects is unlikely to become highly significant. Steam processes are now economic for favorable prospects, and recovery levels range from 5 to 35%. Miscible gas processes are particularly applicable to those reservoirs with favorable geology located near sources of CO/sub 2/, and production could become significant in the next five years, but not sooner due to the time necessary to develop CO/sub 2/ sources and construct distribution systems. Recovery levels for the miscible gas processes are in the 5 to 15% range. Most surfactant processes are still in the research stage, and will not yield significant production for at least ten years. Ten to fifteen % of the original oil-in-place can be recovered through these processes. In Situ combustion processes are currently economic in some cases, but the ultimate potential is presently very limited unless significant technical breakthroughs are made in the future. It is estimated that the ultimate potential for present enhanced oil recovery processes in the conterminous United States is up to 20 billion barrels of petroleum.

Mattax, C.C.

1980-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

24

Report on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Recovery Act  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Recovery Act Projects Now Available Report on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Recovery Act Projects Now Available August 15, 2013 - 10:48am Addthis The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability has released a new report that explains synchrophasor technologies and how they can be used to improve the efficiency, reliability, and resiliency of grid operations. The report also includes an analysis of the costs and benefits of synchrophasors, based on data and initial results from Recovery Act-funded projects that are deploying the technologies. The report is available now for downloading. Addthis Related Articles Reports on the Impact of the Smart Grid Investment Grant Program Now

25

Report on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Recovery Act  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Report on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Recovery Act Projects Now Available Report on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Recovery Act Projects Now Available August 15, 2013 - 10:48am Addthis The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability has released a new report that explains synchrophasor technologies and how they can be used to improve the efficiency, reliability, and resiliency of grid operations. The report also includes an analysis of the costs and benefits of synchrophasors, based on data and initial results from Recovery Act-funded projects that are deploying the technologies. The report is available now for downloading. Addthis Related Articles Reports on the Impact of the Smart Grid Investment Grant Program Now

26

Faces of the Recovery Act: 1366 Technologies | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1366 Technologies 1366 Technologies Faces of the Recovery Act: 1366 Technologies Addthis Description LEXINGTON, MA - At 1366 Technologies, Ely Sachs and Frank van Mierlo are using ARPA-E Recovery Act funding to dramatically reduce the costs of solar panel production. Speakers President Obama, Ely Sachs, Frank van Mierlo Duration 4:00 Topic Energy Economy Recovery Act Solar ARPA-E Summit Emerging Technologies Credit Energy Department Video PRESIDENT OBAMA: Next we need to encourage American innovation. Last year we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history - (applause) - an investment - an investment that could lead to the world's cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched. And no area is more ripe for such

27

Future Technologies to Enhance Geothermal Energy Recovery  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Geothermal power is a renewable, low-carbon option for producing base-load (i.e., low-intermittency) electricity. Improved technologies have the potential to access untapped geothermal energy sources, which experts estimate to be greater than 100,000 MWe. However, many technical challenges in areas such as exploration, drilling, reservoir engineering, and energy conversion must be addressed if the United States is to unlock the full potential of Earth's geothermal energy and displace fossil fuels. (For example, see Tester et al., 2006; Green and Nix, 2006; and Western Governors Association, 2006.) Achieving next-generation geothermal power requires both basic science and applied technology to identify prospective resources and effective extraction strategies. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has a long history of research and development work in support of geothermal power. Key technologies include advances in scaling and brine chemistry, economic and resource assessment, direct use, exploration, geophysics, and geochemistry. For example, a high temperature, multi-spacing, multi-frequency downhole EM induction logging tool (GeoBILT) was developed jointly by LLNL and EMI to enable the detection and orientation of fractures and conductive zones within the reservoir (Figure 1). Livermore researchers also conducted studies to determine how best to stave off increased salinity in the Salton Sea, an important aquatic ecosystem in California. Since 1995, funding for LLNL's geothermal research has decreased, but the program continues to make important contributions to sustain the nation's energy future. The current efforts, which are highlighted in this report, focus on developing an Engineered Geothermal System (EGS) and on improving technologies for exploration, monitoring, characterization, and geochemistry. Future research will also focus on these areas.

Roberts, J J; Kaahaaina, N; Aines, R; Zucca, J; Foxall, B; Atkins-Duffin, C

2008-07-25T23:59:59.000Z

28

Brayton Solvent Recovery Heat Pump Technology Update  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Brayton cycle technology was developed to reduce the temperature of gas streams containing solvents in order to condense and recover them. While the use of turbo compressor/expander machinery in conjunction with an energy recuperator is the basis for this heat pump process, many variations can be incorporated to optimize the total process for specific applications. Several process schemes will be discussed including both direct condensation and adsorption approaches. For situations where the solvent is at a relatively high concentration, such as tank filling operations, the direct condensation system is chosen. If the concentrations are low, which would be the case for an oven drying operation, activated carbon beds are used to concentrate the solvent. Many improvements on the first generation designs have been made in both process and the equipment components used for various commercial installations. Several specific applications have been identified as being well suited to take advantage of the features of this type of equipment.

Enneking, J. C.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Financial Opportunities Financial Opportunities Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell Market Transformation to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell Market Transformation on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell Market Transformation on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell Market Transformation on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell Market Transformation on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell Market Transformation on Digg

30

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12, 2011 12, 2011 CX-004980: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act ? Clean Energy Coalition Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 01/12/2011 Location(s): Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 12, 2011 CX-004979: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act ? Clean Energy Coalition Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/12/2011 Location(s): Detroit, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 12, 2011 CX-004978: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act ? Clean Energy Coalition Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/12/2011 Location(s): Taylor, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

31

Optical Fiber Sensor Technologies for Efficient and Economical Oil Recovery  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Optical Fiber Sensor Technologies for Optical Fiber Sensor Technologies for Efficient and Economical Oil Recovery Final Technical Report Reporting Period Start Date: 1 October 1998 Reporting Period End Date: 31 March 2003 Principal Investigator: Anbo Wang Principal Report Authors: Kristie L. Cooper, Gary R. Pickrell, Anbo Wang Report Issued: June 2003 DOE Award Number: DE-FT26-98BC15167 Submitted by: Center for Photonics Technology Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Blacksburg, VA 24061-0111 ii Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or

32

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

15, 2010 15, 2010 CX-004238: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Dioxide-Water Emulsions for Enhanced Oil Recovery and Permanent Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 10/15/2010 Location(s): Traverse City, Michigan Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 15, 2010 CX-004237: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Dioxide-Water Emulsions For Enhanced Oil Recovery And Permanent Sequestration Of Carbon Dioxide CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 10/15/2010 Location(s): Lowell, Massachusetts Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 15, 2010 CX-004235: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma-Tribe-Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 10/15/2010

33

Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Ground Source Heat Pump  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ground Source Heat Pump Demonstration Projects to someone by E-mail Ground Source Heat Pump Demonstration Projects to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Ground Source Heat Pump Demonstration Projects on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Ground Source Heat Pump Demonstration Projects on Twitter Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Ground Source Heat Pump Demonstration Projects on Google Bookmark Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Ground Source Heat Pump Demonstration Projects on Delicious Rank Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Ground Source Heat Pump Demonstration Projects on Digg Find More places to share Building Technologies Office: Recovery Act-Funded Ground Source Heat Pump Demonstration Projects on AddThis.com...

34

Immediate Deployment of Waste Energy Recovery Technologies at Multi Sites  

SciTech Connect

Verso Paper Corp. implemented a portfolio of 13 commercially available proven industrial technologies each exceeding 30% minimum threshold efficiency and at least 25% efficiency increase. These sub-projects are a direct result of a grant received from the Department of Energy (DOE) through its FOA 0000044 (Deployment of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Systems, District Energy Systems, Waste Energy Recovery Systems, and Efficient Industrial Equipment), which was funded by the American Recovery Act. These were installed at 3 sites in 2 states and are helping to reduce Verso costs, making the facilities more competitive. This created approximately 100 construction jobs (FTE's) and reduced impacted Verso facilities' expense budgets. These sub-projects were deployed at Verso paper mills located in Jay, Maine, Bucksport, Maine, and Sartell, Minnesota. The paper mills are the economic engines of the rural communities in which these mills are located. Reinvestment in waste energy recovery capital improvements is providing a stimulus to help maintain domestic jobs and to competitively position the US pulp and paper industry with rising energy costs. Energy efficiency improvements are also providing a positive environmental impact by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the quantity of wastewater treated and discharged, and fossil fuel demand. As a result of these projects, when fully operating, Verso realized a total of approximately 1.5 TBtu/Year reduction in overall energy consumption, which is 119% of the project objectives. Note that three paper machines have since been permanently curtailed. However even with these shutdowns, the company still met its energy objectives. Note also that the Sartell mill's paper machine is down due to a recent fire which damaged the mill's electrical infrastructure (the company has not decided on the mill's future).

Dennis Castonguay

2012-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

35

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Objectives are listed and technical progress is summarized for contracts for field projects and supporting research on: chemical flooding, carbon dioxide injection, thermal/heavy oil, extraction technology, improved drilling technology, residual oil, and microbial enhanced oil recovery. (DLC)

Linville, B. (ed.)

1980-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

Bartlesville Energy Technology Center enhanced oil recovery project data base  

SciTech Connect

The BETC Enhanced Oil Recovery Data Base is currently being developed to provide an information resource to accelerate the advancement and applications of EOR technology. The primary initial sources of data have been the Incentive and Cost-Shared Programs. The data base presently contains information on 607 EOR projects. This includes 410 of the approximately 423 projects which operators originally applied for certification with the Incentive Program; 20 EOR projects under the Cost-Shared Program; and a data base relating to 177 projects developed by Gulf Universities Research Consortium. In addition, relevant data from all previous DOE-funded contractor EOR data bases will be integrated into the BETC data base. Data collection activities from publicly available information sources is continuing on an on-going basis to insure the accuracy and timeliness of the information within the data base. The BETC data base is being developed utilizing a commercial data base management system. The basic structure of the data base is presented as Appendix I. This data base includes information relating to reservoir characteristics, process-specific data, cost information, production data, and contact persons for each project. The preliminary list of data elements and the current density of occurrence is presented as Appendix II. A basic profile of the types of projects contained within the developmental data base is contained in Appendix III. Appendix IV presents a number of system output reports to illustrate potential data base applications. Plans to eventually place the data base in a computer system which would be publicly accessible are currently under active consideration. A list of Incentive projects processed to date by BETC is provided as Appendix V. Appendix VI gives a detailed report by EOR Process for all projects in the BETC's Enhanced Oil Recovery Data Base.

Not Available

1982-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

43: Categorical Exclusion Determination 43: Categorical Exclusion Determination American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Local Energy Assurance Planning (LEAP) - (Chicago, Illlinois) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 04/01/2010 Location(s): Chicago, Illinois Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 1, 2010 CX-001633: Categorical Exclusion Determination Port Townsend Paper Company CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/01/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 1, 2010 CX-001682: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program (SEP) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) - Phase 1 - Wind Turbine for Guthrie Waste Water Treatment Plant CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 04/01/2010

38

Supporting technology for enhanced oil recovery: EOR thermal processes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains the results of efforts under the six tasks of the Seventh Amendment and Extension of Annex IV, Enhanced Oil Recovery Thermal Processes of the Venezuela/USA Agreement. The report is presented in sections (for each of the 6 tasks) and each section contains one or more reports prepared by various individuals or groups describing the results of efforts under each of the tasks. A statement of each task, taken from the agreement, is presented on the first page of each section. The tasks are numbered 50 through 55. The first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh reports on Annex IV, Venezuela MEM/USA-DOE Fossil Energy Report IV-1, IV-2, IV-3, IV-4, IV-5 and IV-6 (DOE/BETC/SP-83/15, DOE/BC-84/6/SP, DOE/BC-86/2/SP, DOE/BC-87/2/SP, DOE/BC-89/l/SP, DOE/BC-90/l/SP, and DOE/BC-92/l/SP) contain the results for the first 49 tasks. Those reports are dated April 1983, August 1984, March 1986, July 1987, November 1988, December 1989, and October 1991, respectively. Each task report has been processed separately for inclusion in the Energy Science and Technology Database.

Reid, T.B. (USDOE Bartlesville Project Office, OK (United States)); Colonomos, P. (INTEVEP, Filial de Petroleos de Venezuela, SA, Caracas (Venezuela))

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

Waste Heat Recovery and Furnace Technology - Programmaster.org  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Mar 5, 2013 ... Each source of waste heat is listed together with the assessment for potential cogeneration or direct recovery. The overall impact on energy...

40

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

American Recovery and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions related to the the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 14, 2011 CX-006764: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, B5.1 Date: 09/14/2011 Location(s): Haltom City, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 14, 2011 CX-006763: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, B5.1 Date: 09/14/2011 Location(s): Friendswood, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions related to the the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 23, 2010 CX-004590: Categorical Exclusion Determination Re-Utilization of Industrial Carbon Dioxide for Algae Production Using a Phase Change Material CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 11/23/2010 Location(s): Dexter, Michigan Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 23, 2010 CX-004556: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kentucky-County-Hardin CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B5.1 Date: 11/23/2010 Location(s): Hardin County, Kentucky

42

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions related to the the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD April 5, 2010 CX-001438: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Cities Transportation Sector Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 04/05/2010 Location(s): Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 5, 2010 CX-001437: Categorical Exclusion Determination Market Title: Clean Energy Grant Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 04/05/2010 Location(s): Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

43

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions related to the the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 2, 2009 CX-000026: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ivanoff Bay Village Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 11/02/2009 Location(s): Ivanoff Bay, Alaska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy November 2, 2009 CX-000025: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cortina Rancheria of Wintun Indians Renewable Energy Technologies (Wind) on Government Buildings CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B3.6, A1

44

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions related to the the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD January 19, 2011 CX-005047: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chicago Area Alternative Fuels Deployment Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/19/2011 Location(s): Chicago, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 19, 2011 CX-005039: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development and Validation of a Gas-Fired Residential Heat Pump Water Heater CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/19/2011

45

Handbook for personal computer versions enhanced oil recovery predictive models: Supporting technology for enhanced oil recovery  

SciTech Connect

The personal computer (PC) programs described in this handbook were adapted from the Tertiary Oil Recovery Information System (TORIS) enhanced oil recovery (EOR) predictive models. The models, both those developed for the Department of Energy and those developed for the National Petroleum Council (NPC), were designed by Scientific Software-Intercomp and were used in the 1984 NPC study on the national potential for enhanced oil recovery. The Department of Energy, Bartlesville Project Office, supported the NPC study and has maintained the models since the study was completed. 10 refs.

Allison, E.; Waldrop, R.; Ray, R.M.

1988-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

46

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 13, 2011 July 13, 2011 CX-006171: Categorical Exclusion Determination Goochland Womens Correctional Facility - Replacing Coal Boiler with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Boiler CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 07/13/2011 Location(s): Goochland, Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 13, 2011 CX-006167: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act ? Clean Energy Coalition Schwan?s Home Service CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 07/13/2011 Location(s): Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 13, 2011 CX-006155: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wisconsin Clean Transportation Program/City of Milwaukee Compressed Natural Gas Infrastructure Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1

47

NETL: E&P Technologies - Improved Recovery - Stripper Well Technology  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Exploration & Production Technologies Improved Recovery - Stripper Well Technology image of a well linking to Stripper Well Consortium “Stripper well" is a term used to describe wells that produce natural gas or oil at very low rates—less than 10 barrels per day of oil or less than 60 thousand cubic feet per day of gas. Despite their small output, stripper oil and gas wells make a significant contribution to the Nation’s energy supply—and they are the lifeblood of thousands of small, independent oil and gas operating companies. About 80 percent of the roughly 500,000 producing oil wells in the United States are classified as stripper wells. Despite their small volumes, they add up. The >400,000 stripper oil wells in the United States produce, in aggregate, nearly 1 million barrels per day of oil, which represents almost 19% of domestic oil production.

48

ADVANCED OIL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVED RECOVERY FROM SLOPE BASIN CLASTIC RESERVOIRS, NASH DRAW BRUSHY CANYON POOL, EDDY COUNTY, NM  

SciTech Connect

The overall objective of this project is to demonstrate that a development program based on advanced reservoir management methods can significantly improve oil recovery at the Nash Draw Pool (NDP). The plan includes developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing its performance to an area developed using advanced reservoir management methods. Specific goals are (1) to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program can significantly improve oil recovery compared to existing technology applications and (2) to transfer these advanced methodologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elsewhere throughout the U.S. oil and gas industry.

Mark B. Murphy

2004-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

49

ADVANCED OIL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVED RECOVERY FROM SLOPE BASIN CLASTIC RESERVOIRS, NASH DRAW BRUSHY CANYON POOL, EDDY COUNTY, NM  

SciTech Connect

The overall objective of this project is to demonstrate that a development program based on advanced reservoir management methods can significantly improve oil recovery at the Nash Draw Pool (NDP). The plan includes developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing its performance to an area developed using advanced reservoir management methods. Specific goals are (1) to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program can significantly improve oil recovery compared to existing technology applications and (2) to transfer these advanced methodologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elsewhere throughout the U.S. oil and gas industry.

Mark B. Murphy

2003-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

50

ADVANCED OIL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVED RECOVERY FROM SLOPE BASIN CLASTIC RESERVOIRS, NASH DRAW BRUSHY CANYON POOL, EDDY COUNTY, NM  

SciTech Connect

The overall objective of this project is to demonstrate that a development program based on advanced reservoir management methods can significantly improve oil recovery at the Nash Draw Pool (NDP). The plan includes developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing its performance to an area developed using advanced reservoir management methods. Specific goals are (1) to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program can significantly improve oil recovery compared to existing technology applications and (2) to transfer these advanced methodologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elsewhere throughout the U.S. oil and gas industry.

Mark B. Murphy

2002-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

51

ADVANCED OIL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVED RECOVERY FROM SLOPE BASIN CLASTIC RESERVOIRS, NASH DRAW BRUSHY CANYON POOL, EDDY COUNTY, NM  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The overall objective of this project is to demonstrate that a development program based on advanced reservoir management methods can significantly improve oil recovery at the Nash Draw Pool (NDP). The plan includes developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing its performance to an area developed using advanced reservoir management methods. Specific goals are (1) to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program can significantly improve oil recovery compared to existing technology applications and (2) to transfer these advanced methodologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elsewhere throughout the U.S. oil and gas industry.

Mark B. Murphy

2003-07-30T23:59:59.000Z

52

Faces of the Recovery Act: 1366 Technologies | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Kill-a-Watt Competition at University of Central Florida Faces of the Recovery Act: Sun Catalytix Investing in Clean, Safe Nuclear Energy Secretary Chu Speaks at the 2010...

53

New CO2 Enhanced Recovery Technology Could Greatly Boost U.S. Oil |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CO2 Enhanced Recovery Technology Could Greatly Boost U.S. Oil CO2 Enhanced Recovery Technology Could Greatly Boost U.S. Oil New CO2 Enhanced Recovery Technology Could Greatly Boost U.S. Oil March 3, 2006 - 11:40am Addthis WASHINGTON , D.C. - The Department of Energy (DOE) released today reports indicating that state-of-the-art enhanced oil recovery techniques could significantly increase recoverable oil resources of the United States in the future. According to the findings, 89 billion barrels or more could eventually be added to the current U.S. proven reserves of 21.4 billion barrels. "These promising new technologies could further help us reduce our reliance on foreign sources of oil," Energy Secretary Samuel W. Bodman said. "By using the proven technique of carbon sequestration, we get the double

54

Available Technologies: Recovery of Sugars by Solvent Extraction  

The process minimizes toxic byproducts and facilitates ionic liquid reuse. The JBEI invention uses solvent extraction technology, ...

55

Quantifying the impact of AIDC technologies for vehicle component recovery  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Recovering value from end-of-life vehicles (ELV) has become increasingly important in recent years due to legislative pressures. In this context, cannibalisation of valuable components for possible reuse in secondary markets is becoming a popular option. ... Keywords: Decision-making, RFID, Value of information, Vehicle component recovery

Ajith Kumar Parlikad; Duncan McFarlane

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2010 1, 2010 CX-001067: Categorical Exclusion Determination Delaware State American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (T) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 02/11/2010 Location(s): Delaware, Delaware Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 11, 2010 CX-001953: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas State Energy Program (SEP) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) - Alternative Fuels and Technology Program - SEP CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 02/11/2010 Location(s): Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 11, 2010 CX-001974: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program (SEP) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)

57

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 27, 2010 December 27, 2010 CX-004778: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct Scrubber CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 12/27/2010 Location(s): Point Comfort, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 27, 2010 CX-004777: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct Scrubber CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 12/27/2010 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 27, 2010 CX-004776: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Innovative Carbon Dioxide Sequestration from Flue Gas using an In-Duct Scrubber CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6

58

NREL: Technology Deployment - FEMA Engages NREL in Hurricane Sandy Recovery  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FEMA Engages NREL in Hurricane Sandy Recovery Effort FEMA Engages NREL in Hurricane Sandy Recovery Effort May 8, 2013 Natural Disasters, By the Numbers There have been 144 weather/climate disasters since 1980 in which overall damages reached or exceeded $1 billion. In 2005, the estimated economic loss due to Hurricane Katrina was about $187 billion. In 2012, the estimated total loss due to Hurricane Sandy was $71 billion in New York and New Jersey alone. By the time Hurricane Sandy pounded the East Coast on October 29, 2012, it had grown to be the largest Atlantic hurricane on record-with winds spanning 1,100 miles. The devastation left in its wake affected 24 states with the most severe damage concentrated in New Jersey and New York; total damage topped an estimated $71 billion for the two states alone. For the first time, NREL was funded by the Federal Emergency Management

59

Repair Welding Technologies For Heat Recovery Steam Generators  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Tube failures that occur in heat recovery steam generators (HRSGs) are often caused by thermal stress or thermal shock associated with cyclic plant operation or by flow-accelerated corrosion. Many premature failures occur along the length of finned tubes or at attachment locations where tubes are joined to the upper or lower header. Because of current tube repair practices and limited access for welding, reoccurring failures are common.

2005-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

60

Supporting technology for enhanced oil recovery - EOR thermal processes  

SciTech Connect

This report contains the results of efforts under the six tasks of the Eighth Amendment and Extension of Annex IV, Enhanced Oil Recovery Thermal Processes of the Venezuela/USA Agreement. The report is presented in sections and each section contains one or more reports prepared by various individuals or groups describing the results of efforts under each of the tasks. A statement of each task, taken from the agreement, is presented on the first page of each section.

NONE

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2010 5, 2010 CX-002415: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Retrofits for State Correctional Facilities - East Thomas Officer Barracks Solar Thermal CX(s) Applied: B2.2, A9, B1.5, B5.1 Date: 05/25/2010 Location(s): West Birmingham, Alabama Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 25, 2010 CX-002555: Categorical Exclusion Determination American Recovery and Reinvestment Act State Energy Program City of Weslaco Solar Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/25/2010 Location(s): Weslaco, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 25, 2010 CX-002484: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bley LLC Green Energy Component Manufacturing Capacity and Capability Development Initiative CX(s) Applied: B5.1

62

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2011 6, 2011 CX-005871: Categorical Exclusion Determination City of Mesa Reclamation Blower Units CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/16/2011 Location(s): Mesa, Arizona Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 13, 2011 CX-005816: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Program Administration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 05/13/2011 Location(s): Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 13, 2011 CX-005815: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grant Rebate Program for Renewable Energy Projects (Solar, Wind, Biomass) at State/Local Government Facilities CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 05/13/2011 Location(s): Virginia

63

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-004415: Categorical Exclusion Determination New York-City-Babylon, Town of CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 11/09/2010 Location(s): Babylon, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy November 9, 2010 CX-004410: Categorical Exclusion Determination Non-Utility Scale Renewable Energy - Sandywood Homes CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/09/2010 Location(s): Tiverton, Rhode Island Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 8, 2010 CX-004433: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pennsylvania Economic Development Association Sustainable Business Recovery for the Fox Chase Cancer Center CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/08/2010 Location(s): Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

64

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2010 2, 2010 CX-001042: Categorical Exclusion Determination Verso Paper Corporation Waste Energy Recovery (Bucksport) CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B5.1 Date: 03/02/2010 Location(s): Bucksport, Maine Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 2, 2010 CX-001017: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Efficiency, Wideband Three-Phase Rectifiers and Adaptive Rectivier Management CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B5.1 Date: 03/02/2010 Location(s): Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 2, 2010 CX-001015: Categorical Exclusion Determination Integrated Direct Current (dc)-dc Conversion for Energy-Efficiency Multicore Microprocessors CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 03/02/2010 Location(s): New York

65

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2011 6, 2011 CX-006097: Categorical Exclusion Determination California-City-Indio CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B1.32, B2.5, B3.6, B5.1 Date: 06/16/2011 Location(s): Indio, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 14, 2011 CX-006141: Categorical Exclusion Determination Revised Market Title for Renewable Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 06/14/2011 Location(s): New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 14, 2011 CX-006139: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: San Bernardino Associated Government Natural Gas Truck Project CX(s) Applied: B2.2, B2.3, B5.1 Date: 06/14/2011 Location(s): Fontana, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

66

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 16, 2010 December 16, 2010 CX-004754: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program: Renewable Energy Development CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Maine Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 14, 2010 CX-004730: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority Oklahoma Comfort Program Large System Request G CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/14/2010 Location(s): Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 14, 2010 CX-004743: Categorical Exclusion Determination New River Solar Thermal Hot Water Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/14/2010 Location(s): Virginia

67

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2011 5, 2011 CX-005991: Categorical Exclusion Determination Prairie Village, Kansas Ground Source Heat Pump Relocation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/25/2011 Location(s): Prairie Village, Kansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 25, 2011 CX-005988: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Technology Acceleration Center - Solar Thermal Energy Storage Test Facility CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B1.15, B3.6 Date: 05/25/2011 Location(s): Denver, Colorado Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 25, 2011 CX-005961: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act ? Clean Energy Coalition Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/25/2011 Location(s): Taylor, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

68

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2010 1, 2010 CX-000956: Categorical Exclusion Determination Connecticut Clean Cities Future Fuels Project (New Vehicles) CX(s) Applied: A7, A11 Date: 03/01/2010 Location(s): Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 1, 2010 CX-001832: Categorical Exclusion Determination Deployment of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy - Agriculture CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2010 Location(s): Oregon Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 26, 2010 CX-002147: Categorical Exclusion Determination South Dakota American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 02/26/2010 Location(s): South Dakota Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

69

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29, 2010 29, 2010 CX-001871: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low Energy Building Materials CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/29/2010 Location(s): Caledonia, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 29, 2010 CX-001878: Categorical Exclusion Determination Industrial Energy Efficiency CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/29/2010 Location(s): Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 29, 2010 CX-001573: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: City of Eagan Ice Arena CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/29/2010 Location(s): Eagan, Minnesota Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 29, 2010 CX-001465: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Central Texas Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Investments

70

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2011 9, 2011 CX-005353: Categorical Exclusion Determination Commercial Industrial and Large Profit- Keller Cresent Chiller Replacement CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/09/2011 Location(s): Pineville, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 9, 2011 CX-005716: Categorical Exclusion Determination City Facilities CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/09/2011 Location(s): Lancaster, Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 9, 2011 CX-005452: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - GEN-X Energy Group, Incorporated CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.7, B5.1 Date: 03/09/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

71

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31, 2010 31, 2010 CX-000717: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pennsylvania - Economic Development Authority Sustainable Business Recovery - Philadelphia Navy Yard CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.24, B1.31, B5.1 Date: 01/31/2010 Location(s): Philadelphia Navy Yard, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 31, 2010 CX-000718: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pennsylvania - Economic Development Authority Sustainable Business Recovery - Pennsylvania Valley School District CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.24, B1.31 Date: 01/31/2010 Location(s): Pottsville, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 31, 2010 CX-000719: Categorical Exclusion Determination

72

Commercial Demonstration of Wood Recovery, Recycling, and Value Adding Technologies  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This commercial demonstration project demonstrated the technical feasibility of converting low-value, underutilized and waste stream solid wood fiber material into higher valued products. With a growing need to increase product/production yield and reduce waste in most sawmills, few recovery operations and practically no data existed to support the viability of recovery operations. Prior to our efforts, most all in the forest products industry believed that recovery was difficult, extremely labor intensive, not cost effective, and that recovered products had low value and were difficult to sell. This project provided an opportunity for many within the industry to see through demonstration that converting waste stream material into higher valued products does in fact offer a solution. Our work, supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, throughout the project aimed to demonstrate a reasonable approach to reducing the millions of recoverable solid wood fiber tons that are annually treated as and converted into low value chips, mulch and fuel. Consequently sawmills continue to suffer from reduced availability of forest resources, higher raw material costs, growing waste disposal problems, increased global competition, and more pressure to operate in an Environmentally Friendly manner. It is our belief (based upon the experience of this project) that the successful mainstreaming of the recovery concept would assist in alleviating this burden as well as provide for a realistically achievable economic benefit to those who would seriously pursue the concept and tap into the rapidly growing ''GREEN'' building marketplace. Ultimately, with participation and aggressive pursuit of the recovery concept, the public would benefit in that: (1) Landfill/disposal waste volume could be reduced adding greater life to existing municipal landfill sites thereby minimizing the need to prematurely license and open added facilities. Also, there would be a cost avoidance benefit associated to what would have been the added municipal (community) management costs involved with maintaining closed landfills. (2) With greater quantities of recovered material being returned to and integrated into manufacturing and the marketplace, reduced demand upon virgin wood sources could help lead the way to promoting improved relations and environmental balance between producers and consumers further expanding the value of our natural resource without adding environmental burden.

Auburn Machinery, Inc.

2004-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

73

ADVANCED OIL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVED RECOVERY FROM SLOPE BASIN CLASTIC RESERVOIRS, NASH DRAW BRUSHY CANYON POOL, EDDY COUNTY, NM  

SciTech Connect

The overall objective of this project is to demonstrate that a development program-based on advanced reservoir management methods-can significantly improve oil recovery at the Nash Draw Pool (NDP). The plan includes developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing its performance to an area developed using advanced reservoir management methods. Specific goals are (1) to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program can significantly improve oil recovery compared to existing technology applications and (2) to transfer these advanced methodologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elsewhere throughout the U.S. oil and gas industry. This is the twenty-eighth quarterly progress report on the project. Results obtained to date are summarized.

Mark B. Murphy

2002-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

74

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10, 2010 10, 2010 CX-003879: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act ? Clean Energy Coalition Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 09/10/2010 Location(s): Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 10, 2010 CX-003878: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act ? Clean Energy Coalition Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/10/2010 Location(s): Melvindale, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 10, 2010 CX-003877: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hybrid Membrane/Absorption Process for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/10/2010 Location(s): Des Plaines, Illinois Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

75

DOE-Sponsored Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural Gas in Wyoming |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sponsored Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural Gas in Sponsored Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural Gas in Wyoming DOE-Sponsored Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural Gas in Wyoming March 26, 2009 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC --Research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oil and Natural Gas Program has found a way to distinguish between groundwater and the water co-produced with coalbed natural gas, thereby boosting opportunities to tap into the vast supply of natural gas in Wyoming as well as Montana. In a recently completed project, researchers at the University of Wyoming used the isotopic carbon-13 to carbon-12 ratio to address environmental issues associated with water co-produced with coalbed natural gas. The research resulted in a patent application for this unique use of the ratio.

76

DOE-Sponsored Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural Gas in Wyoming |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural Gas in Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural Gas in Wyoming DOE-Sponsored Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural Gas in Wyoming March 26, 2009 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC --Research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oil and Natural Gas Program has found a way to distinguish between groundwater and the water co-produced with coalbed natural gas, thereby boosting opportunities to tap into the vast supply of natural gas in Wyoming as well as Montana. In a recently completed project, researchers at the University of Wyoming used the isotopic carbon-13 to carbon-12 ratio to address environmental issues associated with water co-produced with coalbed natural gas. The research resulted in a patent application for this unique use of the ratio. An added benefit of the project, which was managed by the National Energy

77

Technological overview reports for eight shale oil recovery processes  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of the document is to supply background information for evaluation of environmental impacts and pollution control technologies in connection with oil shale development. Six surface retorting processes selected for characterization were: (1) Union Oil Retort B, (2) Paraho, (3) TOSCO II, (4) Lurgi Ruhrgas, (5) Superior Oil, and (6) USBM Gas Combustion. In addition, two in-situ retorting activities were selected: (1) the Occidental modified in-situ retort, and (2) the true in-situ development programs of Laramie Energy Technology Center (DOE). Each overview report contains information on oil shale processing. General process descriptions, shale preparation requirements, equipment types, operating conditions, process products and by-products, physical and chemical characteristics, energy and water requirements, process stream characteristics, processed shale disposal requirements, and site-specific environmental aspects are included.

Shih, C.C.; Cotter, J.E.; Prien, C.H.; Nevens, T.D.

1979-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

Supporting technology for enhanced oil recovery for thermal processes  

SciTech Connect

This report contains the results of efforts under the six tasks of the Ninth Amendment and Extension of Annex IV, Enhanced Oil Recovery Thermal Processes of the Venezuela/USA Agreement. The report is presented in sections (for each of the 6 tasks) and each section contains one or more reports prepared by various individuals or groups describing the results of efforts under each of the tasks. A statement of each task, taken from the agreement, is presented on the first page of each section. The tasks are numbered 62 through 67. The first, second, third, fourth fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth reports on Annex IV, [Venezuela MEM/USA-DOE Fossil Energy Report IV-1, IV-2, IV-3, IV-4, IV-5, IV-6, IV-7, and IV-8 (DOE/BETC/SP-83/15, DOE/BC-84/6/SP, DOE/BC-86/2/SP, DOE/BC-87/2/SP, DOE/BC-90/1/SP, DOE/BC-90/1/SP) (DOE/BC-92/1/SP, DOE/BC-93/3/SP, and DOE/BC-95/3/SP)] contain the results from the first 61 tasks. Those reports are dated April 1983, August 1984, March 1986, July 1987, November 1988, October 1991, February 1993, and March 1995 respectively.

Reid, T.B.; Bolivar, J.

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2010 6, 2010 CX-003804: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: San Bernardino Associated Government Natural Gas Truck Project (Orange, California Infrastructure Modification) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/16/2010 Location(s): Orange, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 16, 2010 CX-003799: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electrochromic Glazing Technology: Improved Performance, Lower Price CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 09/16/2010 Location(s): Faribault, Minnesota Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 16, 2010 CX-003798: Categorical Exclusion Determination Master Curriculum Development for Energy Auditors, Commissioning Agents and

80

Remarks by The President on Recovery Act Funding For Smart Grid Technology  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Remarks by The President on Recovery Act Funding For Smart Grid Remarks by The President on Recovery Act Funding For Smart Grid Technology Remarks by The President on Recovery Act Funding For Smart Grid Technology October 27, 2009 - 12:00am Addthis (Arcadia, Florida) - Today, President Obama spoke at the DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center in Arcadia, Florida where he delivered the below remarks: THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, guys. Thank you very much. Please, have a seat. Thank you so much. Well, first of all, let me thank Lew Hay and his visionary leadership at Florida Power & Light. It's an example of a company that is doing well by doing good. And I think it's a model for what we could duplicate all across the country. To Greg Bove, who just gave me the tour and was a construction manager for this facility, congratulations. We've got a couple of special guests here:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pennsylvania Economic Development Association Sustainable Business Recovery for the Fox Chase Cancer Center CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11082010 Location(s): Philadelphia,...

82

Thermally Activated Desiccant Technology for Heat Recovery and Comfort  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Desiccant cooling is an important part of the diverse portfolio of Thermally Activated Technologies (TAT) designed for conversion of heat for the purpose of indoor air quality control. Thermally activated desiccant cooling incorporates a desiccant material that undergoes a cyclic process involving direct dehumidification of moist air and thermal regeneration. Desiccants fall into two categories: liquid and solid desiccants. Regardless of the type, solid or liquid, the governing principles of desiccant dehumidification systems are the same. In the dehumidification process, the vapor pressure of the moist air is higher than that of the desiccant, leading to transfer of moisture from the air to the desiccant material. By heating the desiccant, the vapor pressure differential is reversed in the regeneration process that drives the moisture from the desiccant. Figure 1 illustrates a rotary solid-desiccant dehumidifier. A burner or a thermally compatible source of waste heat can provide the required heat for regeneration.

Jalalzadeh, A. A.

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

Diesel Engine Waste Heat Recovery Utilizing Electric Turbocompound Technology  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Caterpillar's Technology & Solutions Division conceived, designed, built and tested an electric turbocompound system for an on-highway heavy-duty truck engine. The heart of the system is a unique turbochargerr with an electric motor/generator mounted on the shaft between turbine and compressor wheels. When the power produced by the turbocharger turbine exceeds the power of the compressor, the excess power is converted to electrical power by the generator on the turbo shaft; that power is then used to help turn the crankshaft via an electric motor mounted in the engine flywheel housing. The net result is an improvement in engine fuel economy. The electric turbocompound system provides added control flexibility because it is capable of varying the amount of power extracted from the exhaust gases, thus allowing for control of engine boost. The system configuration and design, turbocharger features, control system development, and test results are presented.

Hopman, Ulrich,; Kruiswyk, Richard W.

2005-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

84

Bartlesville Energy Technology Center enhanced oil recovery project data base  

SciTech Connect

A comprehensive EOR project data base that is validated, integrated, and continuously maintained and updated is being developed at BETC. The data base, which is not currently available to the public, provides an information resource to accelerate the advancement and applications of EOR technology. The primary sources of data have been specific EOR Projects certified in the Incentives Program, the DOE Cost-Shared Tertiary Program, and a data base of ongoing EOR projects supplied by Gulf Universities Research Consortium (GURC). Information from these sources has provided an extensive basis for the development of a comprehensive data base relating the key parameters for EOR projects in the United States. The sources and types of data within the data base are organized in a manner which will facilitate information transfer within the petroleum industry. 28 references, 3 figures, 2 tables.

French, T.R.; Ray, R.M.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 19, 2010 May 19, 2010 CX-002418: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Retrofits for State Correctional Facilities - Mobile Work Release/Work Center Facility Boiler CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.31, B2.2, A9, B5.1 Date: 05/19/2010 Location(s): Pritchard, Alabama Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 19, 2010 CX-002289: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cavitation Pretreatment of a Flotation Feedstock for Enhanced Coal Recovery CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/19/2010 Location(s): Lexington, Kentucky Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 19, 2010 CX-002290: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery - Advanced Underground Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 05/19/2010

86

Recovery Act: Electrochromic Glazing Technology: Improved Performance, Lower Price  

SciTech Connect

The growing dependency of the US on energy imports and anticipated further increases in energy prices reinforce the concerns about meeting the energy demand in the future and one element of a secure energy future is conservation. It is estimated that the buildings sector represents 40% of the US's total energy consumption. And buildings produce as much as one third of the greenhouse gas emissions primarily through fossil fuel usage during their operational phase. A significant fraction of this energy usage is simply due to inefficient window technology. Electrochromic (EC) windows allow electronic control of their optical properties so that the transparency to light can be adjusted from clear to dark. This ability to control the amount of solar energy allowed into the building can be advantageously used to minimize lighting, heating and air conditioning costs. Currently, the penetration of EC windows into the marketplace is extremely small, and consequently there is a huge opportunity for energy savings if this market can be expanded. In order to increase the potential energy savings it is necessary to increase the quantity of EC windows in operation. Additionally, any incremental improvement in the energy performance of each window will add to the potential energy savings. The overall goals of this project were therefore to improve the energy performance and lower the cost of dynamic (EC) smart windows for residential and commercial building applications. This project is obviously of benefit to the public by addressing two major areas: lowering the cost and improving the energy performance of EC glazings. The high level goals for these activities were: (i) to improve the range between the clear and the tinted state, (ii) reduce the price of EC windows by utilizing lower cost materials, (iii) lowering the U-Value1 SAGE Electrochromics Inc. is the only company in the US which has a track record of producing EC windows, and presently has a small operational factory in Faribault MN which is shipping products throughout the world. There is a much larger factory currently under construction close by. This project was targeted specifically to address the issues outlined above, with a view to implementation on the new high volume manufacturing facility. Each of the Tasks which were addressed in this project is relatively straightforward to implement in this new facility and so the benefits of the work will be realized quickly. , and (iv) ensure the proposed changes have no detrimental effect to the proven durability of the window. The research described here has helped to understand and provide solutions to several interesting and previously unresolved issues of the technology as well as make progress in areas which will have a significant impact on energy saving. In particular several materials improvements have been made, and tasks related to throughput and yield improvements have been completed. All of this has been accomplished without any detrimental effect on the proven durability of the SageGlass EC device. The project was divided into four main areas: 1. Improvement of the Properties of the EC device by material enhancements (Task 2); 2. Reduce the cost of production by improving the efficiency and yields of some key manufacturing processes (Task 3); 3. Further reduce the cost by significant modifications to the structure of the device (Task 4); 4. Ensure the durability of the EC device is not affected by any of the changes resulting from these activities (Task 5). A detailed description of the activities carried out in these areas is given in the following report, along with the aims and goals of the work. We will see that we have completed Tasks 2 and 3 fully, and the durability of the resulting device structure has been unaffected. Some of Task 4 was not carried out because of difficulties with integrating the installation of the required targets into the production coater due to external constraints not related to this project. We will also see that the durability of the devices produced as a result of this work was

Burdis, Mark; Sbar, Neil

2012-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

87

Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies for Improved Recovery from Slope Basin Clastic Reservoirs, Nash Draw Brushy Canyon Pool, Eddy County, NM  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Nash Draw Brushy Canyon Pool in Eddy County New Mexico was a cost-shared field demonstration project in the U.S. Department of Energy Class III Program. A major goal of the Class III Program was to stimulate the use of advanced technologies to increase ultimate recovery from slope-basin clastic reservoirs. Advanced characterization techniques were used at the Nash Draw Pool (NDP) project to develop reservoir management strategies for optimizing oil recovery from this Delaware reservoir. The objective of the project was to demonstrate that a development program, which was based on advanced reservoir management methods, could significantly improve oil recovery at the NDP. Initial goals were (1) to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program can significantly improve oil recovery compared to existing technology applications and (2) to transfer these advanced methodologies to other oil and gas producers. Analysis, interpretation, and integration of recently acquired geological, geophysical, and engineering data revealed that the initial reservoir characterization was too simplistic to capture the critical features of this complex formation. Contrary to the initial characterization, a new reservoir description evolved that provided sufficient detail regarding the complexity of the Brushy Canyon interval at Nash Draw. This new reservoir description was used as a risk reduction tool to identify 'sweet spots' for a development drilling program as well as to evaluate pressure maintenance strategies. The reservoir characterization, geological modeling, 3-D seismic interpretation, and simulation studies have provided a detailed model of the Brushy Canyon zones. This model was used to predict the success of different reservoir management scenarios and to aid in determining the most favorable combination of targeted drilling, pressure maintenance, well stimulation, and well spacing to improve recovery from this reservoir. An Advanced Log Analysis technique developed from the NDP project has proven useful in defining additional productive zones and refining completion techniques. This program proved to be especially helpful in locating and evaluating potential recompletion intervals, which has resulted in low development costs with only small incremental increases in lifting costs. To develop additional reserves at lower costs, zones behind pipe in existing wells were evaluated using techniques developed for the Brushy Canyon interval. These techniques were used to complete uphole zones in thirteen of the NDP wells. A total of 14 recompletions were done: four during 1999, four during 2000, two during 2001, and four during 2002-2003. These workovers added reserves of 332,304 barrels of oil (BO) and 640,363 MCFG (thousand cubic feet of gas) at an overall weighted average development cost of $1.87 per BOE (barrel of oil equivalent). A pressure maintenance pilot project in a developed area of the field was not conducted because the pilot area was pressure depleted, and the reservoir in that area was found to be compartmentalized and discontinuous. Economic analyses and simulation studies indicated that immiscible injection of lean hydrocarbon gas for pressure maintenance was not warranted at the NDP and would need to be considered for implementation in similar fields very soon after production has started. Simulation studies suggested that the injection of miscible carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) could recover significant quantities of oil at the NDP, but a source of low-cost CO{sub 2} was not available in the area. Results from the project indicated that further development will be under playa lakes and potash areas that were beyond the regions covered by well control and are not accessible with vertical wells. These areas, covered by 3-D seismic surveys that were obtained as part of the project, were accessed with combinations of deviated/horizontal wells. Three directional/horizontal wells have been drilled and completed to develop reserves under surface-restricted areas and potash mines. The third

Mark B. Murphy

2005-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

88

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23, 2012 23, 2012 CX-008929: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fundamental Investigations and Rational Design of Durable, High-Performance Cathode Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 23, 2012 CX-008928: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Efficiency Molten-Bed Oxy-Coal Combustion with Low Flue Gas Recirculation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 22, 2012 CX-008930: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Clean Cities Transportation Petroleum Reduction Technologies Program CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 08/22/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 21, 2012 CX-008931: Categorical Exclusion Determination

89

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 26, quarter ending March 31, 1981  

SciTech Connect

Objectives and technical progress are summarized for field projects and supporting research in chemical flooding, CO/sub 2/ injection, thermal/heavy oil recovery, resource assessment, extraction technology, microbial enhanced oil recovery, and improved drilling technology. (DLC)

Linville, B. (ed.)

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Advanced Energy and Water Recovery Technology from Low Grade Waste Heat  

SciTech Connect

The project has developed a nanoporous membrane based water vapor separation technology that can be used for recovering energy and water from low-temperature industrial waste gas streams with high moisture contents. This kind of exhaust stream is widely present in many industrial processes including the forest products and paper industry, food industry, chemical industry, cement industry, metal industry, and petroleum industry. The technology can recover not only the sensible heat but also high-purity water along with its considerable latent heat. Waste heats from such streams are considered very difficult to recover by conventional technology because of poor heat transfer performance of heat-exchanger type equipment at low temperature and moisture-related corrosion issues. During the one-year Concept Definition stage of the project, the goal was to prove the concept and technology in the laboratory and identify any issues that need to be addressed in future development of this technology. In this project, computational modeling and simulation have been conducted to investigate the performance of a nanoporous material based technology, transport membrane condenser (TMC), for waste heat and water recovery from low grade industrial flue gases. A series of theoretical and computational analyses have provided insight and support in advanced TMC design and experiments. Experimental study revealed condensation and convection through the porous membrane bundle was greatly improved over an impermeable tube bundle, because of the membrane capillary condensation mechanism and the continuous evacuation of the condensate film or droplets through the membrane pores. Convection Nusselt number in flue gas side for the porous membrane tube bundle is 50% to 80% higher than those for the impermeable stainless steel tube bundle. The condensation rates for the porous membrane tube bundle also increase 60% to 80%. Parametric study for the porous membrane tube bundle heat transfer performance was also done, which shows this heat transfer enhancement approach works well in a wide parameters range for typical flue gas conditions. Better understanding of condensing heat transfer mechanism for porous membrane heat transfer surfaces, shows higher condensation and heat transfer rates than non-permeable tubes, due to existence of the porous membrane walls. Laboratory testing has documented increased TMC performance with increased exhaust gas moisture content levels, which has exponentially increased potential markets for the product. The TMC technology can uniquely enhance waste heat recovery in tandem with water vapor recovery for many other industrial processes such as drying, wet and dry scrubber exhaust gases, dewatering, and water chilling. A new metallic substrate membrane tube development and molded TMC part fabrication method, provides an economical way to expand this technology for scaled up applications with less than 3 year payback expectation. A detailed market study shows a broad application area for this advanced waste heat and water recovery technology. A commercialization partner has been lined up to expand this technology to this big market. This research work led to new findings on the TMC working mechanism to improve its performance, better scale up design approaches, and economical part fabrication methods. Field evaluation work needs to be done to verify the TMC real world performance, and get acceptance from the industry, and pave the way for our commercial partner to put it into a much larger waste heat and waste water recovery market. This project is addressing the priority areas specified for DOE Industrial Technologies Program's (ITP's): Energy Intensive Processes (EIP) Portfolio - Waste Heat Minimization and Recovery platform.

Dexin Wang

2011-12-19T23:59:59.000Z

91

Biochemical technology for the detoxification of geothermal brines and the recovery of trace metals  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Studies conducted at BNL, have shown that a cost-efficient and environmentally acceptable biochemical technology for detoxification of geothermal sludges is most satisfactory, as well as technically achievable. This technology is based on biochemical reactions by which certain extremophilic microorganisms interact with inorganic matrices of geothermal origin. The biochemical treatment of wastes generated by power plants using geothermal energy is a versatile technology adaptable to several applications beyond that of rendering hazardous and/or mixed wastes to non-hazardous by products, which meet regulatory requirements. This technology may be used for solubilization or recovery of a few metals to the isolation of many metals including radionuclides. In the metal recovery mode, an aqueous phase is generated which meets regulatory standards. The resulting concentrate contains valuable trace metals and salts which can be further converted into income generating products which can off-set the initial investment costs associated with the new biotechnology. In this paper, recent developments in this emerging technology will be discussed.

Premuzic, E.T.; Lin, M.S.; Lian, Hsienjen

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Related Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions related to the the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD June 28, 2010 CX-002841: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program (Summary Categorical Exclusion) CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 06/28/2010 Location(s): Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 25, 2010 CX-003086: Categorical Exclusion Determination Improvement of Access Roads on the Cougar-Thurston Number 1 115-Kilovolt and the Thurston-McKenzie Number 1 115-Kilovolt Transmission Lines

93

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2011 3, 2011 CX-006451: Categorical Exclusion Determination Research and Development of an Advanced Low Temperature Heat Recovery Absorption Chiller CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/03/2011 Location(s): Park Forest, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 3, 2011 CX-006448: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 08/03/2011 Location(s): Knightdale, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 3, 2011 CX-006446: Categorical Exclusion Determination DeKalb County/Metropolitan Atlanta Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Vehicle Project CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 08/03/2011 Location(s): Morrow, Georgia

94

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2010 4, 2010 CX-003817: Categorical Exclusion Determination Appliance Technology Evaluation Center (ATEC)- Modification CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/14/2010 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 14, 2010 CX-003816: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: San Bernardino Associated Government Natural Gas Truck Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/14/2010 Location(s): Rancho Dominguez, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 14, 2010 CX-003815: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hardin County General Hospital Energy Efficiency Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 09/14/2010 Location(s): Rosiclare, Illinois

95

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2009 0, 2009 CX-001287: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hire a Consultant, Energy Equipment Upgrades, Building Retrofits, Participate in Programs, Traffic Signal Retrofits Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy December 10, 2009 CX-000354: Categorical Exclusion Determination Plug-In Hybrid Electric Medium Duty Commercial Fleet Demonstration and Evaluation CX(s) Applied: A1, B3.6 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Troy, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000353: Categorical Exclusion Determination General Administrative Action to gather information for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Award CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12/10/2009

96

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-004104: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program Conductor Optimized Rotary Energy Mega-Watt Scale Direct Wind Generator CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 09/29/2010 Location(s): Ronan, Montana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office September 28, 2010 CX-004168: Categorical Exclusion Determination Modeling Variable Refrigerant Flow Heat Pump and Heat Recovery Equipment in EnergyPlus CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.2, B3.6, B5.1 Date: 09/28/2010 Location(s): Brevard County, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 27, 2010 CX-004077: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replacement of a Relay/Transfer Trip Rack at Redmond Substation and a Transfer Trip Panel at LaPine Substation

97

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 28  

SciTech Connect

Highlights of progress during the quarter ending September 30, 1981 are summarized. Field projects and supporting research in the following areas are reported: chemical flooding; carbon dioxide injection; thermal processes/heavy oil (steam and in-situ combustion); resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental; petroleum technology; microbial enhanced oil recovery; and improved drilling technology. A list of BETC publications with abstracts, published during the quarter is included. (DMC)

Linville, B.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress Review No. 31, quarter ending June 30, 1982  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Progress reports are presented of contracts for field projects and supporting research on chemical flooding, carbon dioxide injection, thermal/heavy oil, resource assessment technology, extraction technology, environmental, petroleum technology, microbial enhanced oil recovery, oil recovery by gravity mining, improved drilling technology, and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1982-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies for Improved Recovery from Slope Basin Clastic Reservoirs, Nash Draw Brushy Canyon Pool, Eddy County, New Mexico, Class III  

SciTech Connect

The overall objective of this project was to demonstrate that a development program-based on advanced reservoir management methods-can significantly improve oil recovery at the Nash Draw Pool (NDP). The plan included developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing its performance to an area developed using advanced reservoir management methods. Specific goals were (1) to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program can significantly improve oil recovery compared to existing technology applications and (2) to transfer these advanced methodologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elsewhere throughout the U.S. oil and gas industry.

Murphy, Mark B.

2002-01-16T23:59:59.000Z

100

Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies for Improved Recovery from Slope Basin Clastic Reservoirs, Nash Draw Brushy Canyon Pool, Eddy County, New Mexico, Class III  

SciTech Connect

The overall objective of this project is to demonstrate that a development program based on advanced reservoir management methods can significantly improve oil recovery at the Nash Draw Pool (NDP). The plan includes developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing its performance to an area developed using advanced reservoir management methods. Specific goals are (1) to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program can significantly improve oil recovery compared to existing technology applications and (2) to transfer these advanced methodologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elsewhere throughout the U.S. oil and gas industry.

Murphy, Michael B.

2002-02-21T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2010 7, 2010 CX-003795: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: San Bernardino Associated Government Natural Gas Truck Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/17/2010 Location(s): Rancho Cucamonga, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 17, 2010 CX-003793: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/17/2010 Location(s): Bastrop, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 17, 2010 CX-003790: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/17/2010 Location(s): Taylor, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

102

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-006458: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of Retail Biofuel Infrastructure Supporting I-75 Green Corridor Project CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 08/08/2011 Location(s): Detroit, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 8, 2011 CX-006456: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fuel Cell Program CX(s) Applied: A1, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 08/08/2011 Location(s): Weston, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 4, 2011 CX-006455: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority Sustainable Business Recovery - City of Pittsburgh Natural Gas Refuse Trucks CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 08/04/2011 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

103

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2011 3, 2011 CX-006156: Categorical Exclusion Determination Utility Metering Installation: B3, B14, B36 CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B2.2 Date: 07/13/2011 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 13, 2011 CX-006155: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wisconsin Clean Transportation Program/City of Milwaukee Compressed Natural Gas Infrastructure Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07/13/2011 Location(s): Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 13, 2011 CX-006154: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery State Energy Program - Renewable Energy Incentives - Spencer Residence Open Loop Heat Pump System CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07/13/2011

104

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2010 30, 2010 CX-004106: Categorical Exclusion Determination Green Oil: Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery for America?s Small Oil Producers CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Socorro, New Mexico Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 30, 2010 CX-004105: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Resolution Three-Dimensional Laser Imaging for Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 30, 2010 CX-004100: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Resolution Three-Dimensional Laser Imaging for Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Boulder, Colorado

105

NETL: News Release - DOE-Sponsored Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

March 26, 2009 March 26, 2009 DOE-Sponsored Technology Enhances Recovery of Natural Gas in Wyoming Researchers Seek Patent for Isotopic Ratio to Evaluate Water in Coalbeds Washington, DC -Research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oil and Natural Gas Program has found a way to distinguish between groundwater and the water co-produced with coalbed natural gas, thereby boosting opportunities to tap into the vast supply of natural gas in Wyoming as well as Montana. In a recently completed project, researchers at the University of Wyoming used the isotopic carbon-13 to carbon-12 ratio to address environmental issues associated with water co-produced with coalbed natural gas. The research resulted in a patent application for this unique use of the ratio. An added benefit of the project, which was managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory for the DOE Office of Fossil Energy, was the creation of 27 jobs over the project's 2+ years.

106

Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies for Improved Recovery from Slope Basin Clastic Reservoirs, Nash Draw Brushy Canyon Pool, Eddy County, NM  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Advanced reservoir characterization techniques are being used at the Nash Draw Brushy Canyon Pool project to develop reservoir management strategies for optimizing oil recovery from this Delaware reservoir. The reservoir characterization, geologic modeling, 3-D seismic interpretation, and simulation studies have provided a detailed model of the Brushy Canyon zones. This model was used to predict the success of different reservoir management scenarios and to aid in determining the most favorable combination of targeted drilling, pressure maintenance, well stimulation, and well spacing to improve recovery from this reservoir.

Murphy, M.B.

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 33, quarter ending December 31, 1982  

SciTech Connect

Progress reports are presented of contracts for field projects and supporting research on chemical flooding, carbon dioxide injection, thermal/heavy oil, resource assessment technology, extraction technology, environmental and safety, microbial enhanced oil recovery, oil recovery by gravity mining, improved drilling technology, and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1983-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 32, quarter ending September 30, 1982  

SciTech Connect

Progress reports are presented of contracts for field projects and supporting research on chemical flooding, carbon dioxide injection, thermal/heavy oil, resource assessment technology, extraction technology, environmental and safety, microbial enhanced oil recovery, oil recovery by gravity mining, improved drilling technology, and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

109

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 36 for quarter ending September 30, 1983  

SciTech Connect

Progress reports for the quarter ending September 30, 1983, are presented for field projects and supported research for the following: chemical flooding; carbon dioxide injection; thermal/heavy oil; resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental and safety; microbial enhanced oil recovery; oil recovery by gravity mining; improved drilling technology; and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1984-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

Advanced Membrane Separation Technologies for Energy Recovery from Industrial Process Streams  

SciTech Connect

Recovery of energy from relatively low-temperature waste streams is a goal that has not been achieved on any large scale. Heat exchangers do not operate efficiently with low-temperature streams and thus require such large heat exchanger surface areas that they are not practical. Condensing economizers offer one option for heat recovery from such streams, but they have not been widely implemented by industry. A promising alternative to these heat exchangers and economizers is a prototype ceramic membrane system using transport membrane technology for separation of water vapor and recovery of heat. This system was successfully tested by the Gas Technology Institute (GTI) on a natural gas fired boiler where the flue gas is relatively clean and free of contaminants. However, since the tubes of the prototype system were constructed of aluminum oxide, the brittle nature of the tubes limited the robustness of the system and even limited the length of tubes that could be used. In order to improve the robustness of the membrane tubes and make the system more suitable for industrial applications, this project was initiated with the objective of developing a system with materials that would permit the system to function successfully on a larger scale and in contaminated and potentially corrosive industrial environments. This required identifying likely industrial environments and the hazards associated with those environments. Based on the hazardous components in these environments, candidate metallic materials were identified that are expected to have sufficient strength, thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance to permit production of longer tubes that could function in the industrial environments identified. Tests were conducted to determine the corrosion resistance of these candidate alloys, and the feasibility of forming these materials into porous substrates was assessed. Once the most promising metallic materials were identified, the ability to form an alumina membrane layer on the surface of the metallic tubes was evaluated. Evaluation of this new style of membrane tube involved exposure to SO{sub 2} containing gases as well as to materials with a potential for fouling. Once the choice of substrate and membrane materials and design were confirmed, about 150 tubes were fabricated and assembled into three modules. These modules were mounted on an industrial size boiler and their performance carefully monitored during a limited testing period. The positive results of this performance test confirm the feasibility of utilizing such a system for recovery of heat and water from industrial waste streams. The improved module design along with use of long metallic substrate tubes with a ceramic membrane on the outer surface resulted in the successful, limited scale demonstration of the Transport Membrane Condenser (TMC) technology in the GTI test facility. This test showed this technology can successfully recover a significant amount of heat and water from gaseous waste streams. However, before industry will make the investment to install a full scale TMC, a full scale system will need to be constructed, installed and successfully operated at a few industrial sites. Companies were identified that had an interest in serving as a host site for a demonstration system.

Keiser, J. R.; Wang, D. [Gas Technology Institute; Bischoff, B.; Ciora, [Media and Process Technology; Radhakrishnan, B.; Gorti, S. B.

2013-01-14T23:59:59.000Z

111

Membrane technologies for hydrogen and carbon monoxide recovery from residual gas streams. Tecnologas de membranas para la recuperacin de hidrgeno y monxido de carbono de gases residuales.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??This PhD thesis work is aimed to the separation and recovery of valuable gases from industrial residual gas streams by means of membrane technology. In (more)

David, Oana Cristina

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies for Improved Recovery From Slope Clastic Reservoirs, Nash Draw Brushy Canyon Pool, Eddy County, New Mexico  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The overall goal of this project is to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program based on advanced reservoir management methods can significantly improve oil recovery. The plan included developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing its performance to an area developed using advanced methods. A key goal is to transfer advanced methodologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elsewhere, and throughout the US oil and gas industry.

Mark B. Murphy

1998-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

113

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 02082010 Location(s): Morristown, Pennsylvania Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory...

114

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Technology Laboratory May 3, 2010 CX-002167: Categorical Exclusion Determination New York State Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Infrastructure Deployment CX(s) Applied: B5.1...

115

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000368: Categorical Exclusion Determination New York State Alternative Fuel Vehicle & Infrastructure Deployment CX(s) Applied: A9, A11...

116

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 2009 20, 2009 CX-000438: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Modular Curriculum for Training University Students in Industry Standard Sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery Methods CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.8 Date: 11/20/2009 Location(s): Odessa, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 20, 2009 CX-000437: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Modular Curriculum for Training University Students in Industry Standard Sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery Methods CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.8 Date: 11/20/2009 Location(s): Odessa, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 20, 2009 CX-000373: Categorical Exclusion Determination Measurements of 222 Radon, 220 Radon, and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Natural Carbon Dioxide Fields in Wyoming: Monitoring, Verification, and

117

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 37, quarter ending December 31, 1983  

SciTech Connect

Project reports are presented for field projects and supporting research for the following: chemical flooding; carbon dioxide injection; thermal methods; resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental and safety; microbial enhanced oil recovery; and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1984-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Development of an In Situ Biosurfactant Production Technology for Enhanced Oil Recovery  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The long-term economic potential for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is large with more than 300 billion barrels of oil remaining in domestic reservoirs after conventional technologies reach their economic limit. Actual EOR production in the United States has never been very large, less than 10% of the total U. S. production even though a number of economic incentives have been used to stimulate the development and application of EOR processes. The U.S. DOE Reservoir Data Base contains more than 600 reservoirs with over 12 billion barrels of unrecoverable oil that are potential targets for microbially enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). If MEOR could be successfully applied to reduce the residual oil saturation by 10% in a quarter of these reservoirs, more than 300 million barrels of oil could be added to the U.S. oil reserve. This would stimulate oil production from domestic reservoirs and reduce our nation's dependence on foreign imports. Laboratory studies have shown that detergent-like molecules called biosurfactants, which are produced by microorganisms, are very effective in mobilizing entrapped oil from model test systems. The biosurfactants are effective at very low concentrations. Given the promising laboratory results, it is important to determine the efficacy of using biosurfactants in actual field applications. The goal of this project is to move biosurfactant-mediated oil recovery from laboratory investigations to actual field applications. In order to meet this goal, several important questions must be answered. First, it is critical to know whether biosurfactant-producing microbes are present in oil formations. If they are present, then it will be important to know whether a nutrient regime can be devised to stimulate their growth and activity in the reservoir. If biosurfactant producers are not present, then a suitable strain must be obtained that can be injected into oil reservoirs. We were successful in answering all three questions. The specific objectives of the project were (1) to determine the prevalence of biosurfactant producers in oil reservoirs, and (2) to develop a nutrient regime that would stimulate biosurfactant production in the oil reservoir.

M.J. McInerney; R.M. Knapp; Kathleen Duncan; D.R. Simpson; N. Youssef; N. Ravi; M.J. Folmsbee; T.Fincher; S. Maudgalya; Jim Davis; Sandra Weiland

2007-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

119

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 22, quarter ending March 31, 1980  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains statements of objectives and summaries of technical progress on all DOE contracts pertaining to enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling techniques. Subject categories include chemical flooding; carbon dioxide injection; thermal recovery of heavy oil; resource assessment; improved drilling technology; residual oil; environmental; petroleum technology; and microbial enhanced oil recovery. An index containing the names of the companies and institutions involved is included. Current publications resulting from the DOE contractual program are listed. (DMC)

Linville, B. (ed.)

1980-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 28, 2010 CX-004168: Categorical Exclusion Determination Modeling Variable Refrigerant Flow Heat Pump and Heat Recovery Equipment in EnergyPlus CX(s) Applied: A1, A9,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2009 CX-000242: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: 20 Percent Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12172009 Location(s): Montana...

122

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recovery Act: Direct Confirmation of Commercial Geothermal Resources in Colorado Using Remote Sensing and On-Site Exploration, Testing and Analysis CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04...

123

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pennsylvania - Economic Development Authority Sustainable Business Recovery - Philadelphia Navy Yard CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.24, B1.31, B5.1 Date: 01312010...

124

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Capture and Sequestration (by Enhanced Oil Recovery) Project Phase 1 CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.1 Date: 11122009 Location(s):...

125

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Dioxide-Water Emulsions for Enhanced Oil Recovery and Permanent Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date:...

126

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - Convert CargoMAX Vehicles to Run on Compressed Natural Gas CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08092010 Location(s): Okarche, Oklahoma Office(s):...

127

GBRN/DOE Project: Dynamic enhanced recovery technologies. Quarterly technical report, January 1994--March 1994  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Global Basins Research Network will perform a field demonstration of their ``Dynamic Enhanced Recovery Technology`` to test the concept that the growth faults in EI-330 field are conduits through which producing reservoirs are charged and that enhanced production can be developed by producing directly from the fault zone. The site, operated by Penzoil, is located in 250 feet of water the productive depth intervals include 4000 to 9000 feet. Previous work, which incorporated pressure, temperature, fluid flow, heat flow, seismic, production, and well log data, indicated active fluid flow along fault zones. The field demonstration will be accomplished by drilling and production test of growth fault systems associated with the EI-330 field. The project utilizes advanced 3-D seismic analysis, geochemical studies, structural and stratigraphic reservoir characterization, reservoir simulation, and compact visualization systems. The quarterly progress reports contains accomplishments to date for the following tasks: Management start-up; database management; field and demonstration equipment; reservoir characterization, modeling; geochemistry; and data integration.

Anderson, R.N.

1994-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

128

Determination of technology transfer requirements for enhanced oil recovery. Final report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A detailed field study was conducted to determine the technical information needs of current and potential users of enhanced oil recovery data. Under the direction of the Bartlesville Energy Technology Center (BETC), the study (1) identifies groups which have a need for EOR-related information, (2) delineate the specific information needs of each user-group, and (3) outlines methods for improved transfer of appropriate information to the end users. This study also assesses attitudes toward the EOR-related efforts of the US Department of Energy (DOE) and the BETC, and the role each should play in facilitating the commercialization of EOR processes. More than 300 users and potential users of EOR information were surveyed. Included in the survey sample were representatives of major oil companies, independent oil companies, engineering consulting firms, university and private research organizations, financial institutions and federal, state, and local policy-making bodies. In-depth questionnaires were specifically designed for each group. This study analyzes each group's position pertaining to (1) current level of EOR activity or interest, (2) current and projected EOR information needs, (3) assessments of the BETC's current information services and suggestions for improvement, (4) delineation of technical and economic constraints to increased EOR activity, and (5) steps the DOE might take to enhance the attractiveness of commercial EOR operations.

Wilson, T.D.; Scott, J.P.

1980-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Supporting technology for enhanced oil recovery: Third ammendment and extension to Annex IV enhanced oil recovery thermal processes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains the results of efforts under the seven tasks of the Third Amendment and Extension of Annex IV, Enhanced Oil Recovery Thermal Processes of the Venezuela/USA Agreement. The report is presented in sections (for each of the tasks) and each section contains one or more reports prepared by various individuals or groups describing the results of effort under each of the tasks. A statement of each task, taken from the agreement, is presented on the first page of each section. The tasks are numbered 25 through 31. The first, second, and third reports on Annex IV, ((Venezuela-MEM/USA-DOE Fossil Energy Report IV-1, IV-2, and IV-3 (DOE/BETC/SP-83/15, DOE/BC-84/6/SP, and DOE/BC-86/2/SP)) contain the results from the first 24 tasks. Those reports are dated April 1983, August 1984, and March 1986. Selected papers have been processed for inclusion in the Energy Data Base.

Peterson, G.; Munoz, J.D.

1987-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Progress review No. 24: contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress report, quarter ending September 30, 1980  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Reports are presented of contracts for field projects and supporting research on chemical flooding, carbon dioxide injection and thermal/heavy oil, as well as for the following areas of research: extraction technology; resource assessment technology; environmental; petroleum technology; microbial enhanced oil recovery; improved drilling technology; and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1981-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

APPLICATION OF RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE RECOVERY AND ECONOMICS IN A LOWER QUALITY SHALLOW SHELF SANANDRES RESERVOIR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Class 2 Project at West Welch was designed to demonstrate the use of advanced technologies to enhance the economics of improved oil recovery (IOR) projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate (SSC) reservoirs, resulting in recovery of additional oil that would otherwise be left in the reservoir at project abandonment. Accurate reservoir description is critical to the effective evaluation and efficient design of IOR projects in the heterogeneous SSC reservoirs. Therefore, the majority of Budget Period 1 was devoted to reservoir characterization. Technologies being demonstrated include: (1) Advanced petrophysics; (2) Three-dimensional (3-D) seismic; (3) Crosswell bore tomography; (4) Advanced reservoir simulation; (5) Carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) stimulation treatments; (6) Hydraulic fracturing design and monitoring; (7) Mobility control agents.

Unknown

2003-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

132

Synchrophasor Technologies and their Deployment in the Recovery Act Smart Grid Programs  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Actof 2009 provided $4.5 billion for the Smart Grid Investment Grant (SGIG), Smart Grid Demonstration Program (SGDP), and other DOE smart grid programs....

133

Program Final Report - Develop Thermoelectric Technology for Automotive Waste Heat Recovery  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We conducted a vehicle analysis to assess the feasibility of thermoelectric technology for waste heat recovery and conversion to useful electrical power and found that eliminating the 500 W of electrical power generated by the alternator corresponded to about a 7% increase in fuel economy (FE) for a small car and about 6% for a full size truck. Electric power targets of 300 W were established for city and highway driving cycles for this project. We obtained critical vehicle level information for these driving cycles that enabled a high-level design and performance analysis of radiator and exhaust gas thermoelectric subsystems for several potential vehicle platforms, and we identified the location and geometric envelopes of the radiator and exhaust gas thermoelectric subsystems. Based on this analysis, we selected the Chevrolet Suburban as the most suitable demonstration vehicle for this project. Our modeling and thermal analysis assessment of a radiator-based thermoelectric generator (TEG), however, revealed severe practical limitations. Specifically the small temperature difference of 100°C or less between the engine coolant and ambient air results in a low Carnot conversion efficiency, and thermal resistance associated with air convection would reduce this conversion efficiency even further. We therefore decided not to pursue a radiator-based waste heat recovery system and focused only on the exhaust gas. Our overall approach was to combine science and engineering: (1) existing and newly developed TE materials were carefully selected and characterized by the material researcher members of our team, and most of the material property results were validated by our research partners, and (2) system engineers worked closely with vehicle engineers to ensure that accurate vehicle-level information was used for developing subsystem models and designs, and the subsystem output was analyzed for potential fuel economy gains. We incorporated material, module, subsystem, and integration costs into the material selection criteria in order to balance various materials, module and subsystem design, and vehicle integration options. Our work on advanced TE materials development and on TEG system design, assembly, vehicle integration, and testing proceeded in parallel efforts. Results from our two preliminary prototype TEGs using only Bi-Te TE modules allowed us to solve various mechanical challenges and to finalize and fine tune aspects of the design and implementation. Our materials research effort led us to quickly abandon work on PbTe and focus on the skutterudite materials due to their superior mechanical performance and suitability at automotive exhaust gas operating temperatures. We synthesized a sufficiently large quantity of skutterudite material for module fabrication for our third and final prototype. Our TEG#3 is the first of its kind to contain state-of-the-art skutterudite-based TE modules to be installed and tested on a production vehicle. The design, which consisted of 24 skutterudite modules and 18 Bi-Te modules, attempted to optimize electrical power generation by using these two kinds of TE modules that have their peak performance temperatures matched to the actual temperature profile of the TEG during operation. The performance of TEG#3 was limited by the maximum temperature allowable for the Bi-Te TE modules located in the colder end of the TEG, resulting in the operating temperature for the skutterudite modules to be considerably below optimum. We measured the power output for (1) the complete TEG (25 Watts) and (2) an individual TE module series string (1/3 of the TEG) operated at a 60°C higher temperature (19 Watts). We estimate that under optimum operating temperature conditions, TEG#3 will generate about 235 Watts. With additional improvements in thermal and electrical interfaces, temperature homogeneity, and power conditioning, we estimate TEG#3 could deliver a power output of about 425 Watts.

Gregory Meisner

2011-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

134

Contracts and grants for cooperative research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 20, quarter ending September 30, 1979  

SciTech Connect

The contracts and grants for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology are arranged according to: chemical flooding; carbon dioxide injection; thermal/heavy oil; resource assessment technology; improved drilling technology; residual oil; environmental; and petroleum techology.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

135

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 27, for quarter ending June 30, 1981  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Reports are presented of contracts for field projects and supporting research on chemical flooding, carbon dioxide injection, thermal/heavy oil, as well as for the following areas of research: resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental; microbial enhanced oil recovery; improved drilling technology; and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1981-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

136

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 34, quarter ending March 31, 1983  

SciTech Connect

Progress achieved for the quarter ending March 1983 are presented for field projects and supporting research for the following: chemical flooding; carbon dioxide injection; and thermal/heavy oil. In addition, progress reports are presented for: resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental and safety; microbial enhanced oil recovery; oil recovered by gravity mining; improved drilling technology; and general supporting research. (ATT)

Linville, B. (ed.)

1983-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 30, quarter ending March 31, 1982  

SciTech Connect

Reports are presented of contracts for field projects and supporting research on chemical flooding, carbon dioxide injection, thermal/heavy oil, as well as for the following areas of research: resource assessment technology; extraction technology; microbial enhanced oil recovery; improved drilling technology, and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1982-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 35, quarter ending June 30, 1983  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Progress reports are presented for field projects and supporting research for the following: chemical flooding; carbon dioxide injection; thermal/heavy oil; resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental and safety; microbial enhanced oil recovery; improved drilling technology; and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1983-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

Progress review No. 25: contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress report, quarter ending December 31, 1980  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Reports are presented of contracts for field projects and supporting research on chemical flooding, carbon dioxide injection, thermal/heavy oil, as well as for the following areas of research: resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental; microbial enhanced oil recovery; improving drilling technology; and general supporting research.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1981-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 21, 2011 January 21, 2011 CX-005058: Categorical Exclusion Determination Improving Reservoir Contact for Increased Production and Recovery of Gas Shale Reservoirs CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/21/2011 Location(s): Salt Lake City, Utah Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 20, 2011 CX-005057: Categorical Exclusion Determination Area of Interest 1, Carbon Dioxide at the Interface: Nature and Dynamics of the Reservoir/Caprock Contact and Implications for Carbon Storage Performance CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 01/20/2011 Location(s): Eau Claire, Wisconsin Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 20, 2011 CX-005056: Categorical Exclusion Determination Area of Interest 1, Carbon Dioxide at the Interface: Nature and Dynamics of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2011 22, 2011 CX-005287: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Jersey Compressed Natural Gas Refuse Trucks, Shuttle Buses and Infrastructure Project: Essex Company Resource Recovery Facility CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/22/2011 Location(s): Newark, New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 18, 2011 CX-005283: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of Retail Biofuel Infrastructure Supporting I-75 Green Corridor Project CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/18/2011 Location(s): Miami, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 18, 2011 CX-005282: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of Retail Biofuel Infrastructure Supporting I-75 Green

142

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 2010 20, 2010 CX-003720: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act - Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Smart Grid Regional Demonstration Project CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6, B4.4, B5.1 Date: 09/20/2010 Location(s): Los Angeles County, California Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 20, 2010 CX-003727: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program: Strengthening Building Retrofit Markets and Stimulating Energy Efficiency Action CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 09/20/2010 Location(s): Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 20, 2010 CX-003726: Categorical Exclusion Determination Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens Waste-to-Energy Project

143

Analysis of energy recovery potential using innovative technologies of waste gasification  

SciTech Connect

Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Energy recovery from waste by gasification was simulated. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Two processes: high temperature gasification and gasification associated to plasma. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Two types of feeding waste: Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) and pulper residues. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Different configurations for the energy cycles were considered. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Comparison with performances from conventional Waste-to-Energy process. - Abstract: In this paper, two alternative thermo-chemical processes for waste treatment were analysed: high temperature gasification and gasification associated to plasma process. The two processes were analysed from the thermodynamic point of view, trying to reconstruct two simplified models, using appropriate simulation tools and some support data from existing/planned plants, able to predict the energy recovery performances by process application. In order to carry out a comparative analysis, the same waste stream input was considered as input to the two models and the generated results were compared. The performances were compared with those that can be obtained from conventional combustion with energy recovery process by means of steam turbine cycle. Results are reported in terms of energy recovery performance indicators as overall energy efficiency, specific energy production per unit of mass of entering waste, primary energy source savings, specific carbon dioxide production.

Lombardi, Lidia, E-mail: lidia.lombardi@unifit.it [Dipartimento di Energetica, University of Florence, via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Florence (Italy); Carnevale, Ennio [Dipartimento di Energetica, University of Florence, via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Florence (Italy); Corti, Andrea [Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, University of Siena, via Roma 56, 56100 Siena (Italy)

2012-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

144

Energy supply strategy: getting technology commercialized, shale oil and enhanced oil recovery  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Purpose is to identify factors inhibiting the near-term investment of industrial funds for producing oil from shale and through enhanced oil recovery, and to estimate the investment and production which would result if these deterrents were removed and suitable incentives provided. The barriers are discussed under the following categories: economic, environmental, institutional/regulatory, and technical. (DLC)

Steger, J.E.; Sullo, P.; Michaelis, M.; Nason, H.K.

1979-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 29, quarter ending December 31, 1981  

SciTech Connect

Highlights of progress accomplished during the quarter ending December, 1981, are summarized in this report. Discussion is presented under the following headings: chemical flooding - field projects; chemical flooding - supporting research; carbon dioxide injection - field projects; carbon dioxide injection - supporting research; thermal/heavy oil - field projects and supporting research; resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental aspects; petroleum processing technology; microbial enhanced oil recovery; and improved drilling technology. (DMC)

Linville, B. (ed.)

1982-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

Supporting technology for enhanced oil recovery: EOR thermal processes. Seventh Amendment and Extension to Annex 4, Enhanced oil recovery thermal processes  

SciTech Connect

This report contains the results of efforts under the six tasks of the Seventh Amendment and Extension of Annex IV, Enhanced Oil Recovery Thermal Processes of the Venezuela/USA Agreement. The report is presented in sections (for each of the 6 tasks) and each section contains one or more reports prepared by various individuals or groups describing the results of efforts under each of the tasks. A statement of each task, taken from the agreement, is presented on the first page of each section. The tasks are numbered 50 through 55. The first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh reports on Annex IV, Venezuela MEM/USA-DOE Fossil Energy Report IV-1, IV-2, IV-3, IV-4, IV-5 and IV-6 (DOE/BETC/SP-83/15, DOE/BC-84/6/SP, DOE/BC-86/2/SP, DOE/BC-87/2/SP, DOE/BC-89/l/SP, DOE/BC-90/l/SP, and DOE/BC-92/l/SP) contain the results for the first 49 tasks. Those reports are dated April 1983, August 1984, March 1986, July 1987, November 1988, December 1989, and October 1991, respectively. Each task report has been processed separately for inclusion in the Energy Science and Technology Database.

Reid, T.B. [USDOE Bartlesville Project Office, OK (United States); Colonomos, P. [INTEVEP, Filial de Petroleos de Venezuela, SA, Caracas (Venezuela)

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

Study for Snake Robot Technology for Inspection of Headers and Tubes in Heat Recovery Steam Generators  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) tubing is especially difficult to inspect using conventional nondestructive evaluation (NDE) techniques because: The tubing is tightly bundled, with interior bundle tubing typically inaccessible by conventional equipment without cutting and later repairing the exterior tubes. The tubing is finned and, since ultrasonic techniques require solid contact with the tube, cannot be accessed unless the tubing is cut away. Access to the inside of the tubes is difficult, requi...

2009-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

148

Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Opportunities: An Update on Industrial High Temperature Heat Pump Technologies  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

It is estimated that as much as 20% to 50% of energy consumed is lost via waste heat contained in streams of exhaust gases and hot liquids, as well as through conduction, convection or radiation emanating from the surface of hot equipment. It is also estimated that in some cases, such as industrial furnaces, efficiency improvements resulting from waste heat recovery can improve efficiency by 10% to as much as 50%. This technical update is a continuation of research conducted by the Electric Power ...

2013-12-04T23:59:59.000Z

149

Available Technologies  

Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies. Monitoring and Imaging; Remediation; Modeling; Imaging & Lasers.

150

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: Recovery Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell Market Transformation Act Projects Funded for Fuel Cell Market Transformation Following the fuel cell funding announcement, DOE funded the fuel cell market transformation projects listed below. These projects focus on fuel cell systems in emergency backup power, material handling, and combined heat and power applications, with the goal of improving the potential of fuel cells to provide power in stationary, portable, and specialty vehicles. The Fuel Cell Technologies Office is collecting and analyzing data from these projects to show potential adopters the benefits and real-world performance of fuel cells. These data are aggregated across industries and sites as composite data products to provide relevant technology status results and fuel cell performance data without revealing proprietary information. These publicly available data products build the business case for fuel cells and help fuel cell developers understand the state of technologies while identifying ways to improve them.

151

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2010 7, 2010 CX-003486: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act - State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/17/2010 Location(s): Kenner, Louisiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 17, 2010 CX-003482: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act EE-0000169 CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/17/2010 Location(s): Bloomington, Indiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 17, 2010 CX-003480: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act EE-0000169 CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/17/2010 Location(s): Lafayette, Indiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

152

Advanced oil recovery technologies for improved recovery from slope basin clastic reservoirs, Nash Draw Brushy Canyon Pool, Eddy County, NM. Quarterly technical progress report, October 1--December 31, 1995  

SciTech Connect

Objective is to demonstrate that a development program based on advanced reservoir management methods can significantly improve oil recovery and to transfer this technology to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin. The demonstration plan includes developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing the performance of the control area with an area developed using advanced management methods. Specific goals are (1) to demonstrate that a development drilling program and pressure maintenance program, based on advanced reservoir management methods, can significantly improve oil recovery compared with existing technology applications, and (2) to transfer the advanced technologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elswhere in the US oil and gas industry. This is the first quarterly progress report on the project; results to date are summarized.

NONE

1996-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

153

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Technology Acceleration Center - Solar Thermal Energy Storage Test Facility CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B1.15, B3.6 Date: 05252011...

154

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Laboratory February 10, 2011 CX-005265: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hybrid Vehicle Purchase Project CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02102011 Location(s):...

155

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 CX-004960: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boeing Research and Technology -Low-Cost, High-Energy Density Flywheel Storage Grid CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08132010...

156

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Collaborative CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03012011 Location(s): Westhampton, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology...

157

Supporting Technology for Enhanced Oil Recovery-EOR Thermal Processes Report IV-12  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains the results of efforts under the six tasks of the Ninth Amendment and Extension of Annex IV, Enhanced Oil Recovery Thermal Processes of the Venezuela/USA Agreement. The report is presented in sections (for each of the 6 tasks) and each section contains one or more reports prepared by various individuals or groups describing the results of efforts under each of the tasks. A statement of each task, taken from the agreement, is presented on the first page of each section. The tasks are numbered 62 through 67. The first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eight, and ninth reports on Annex IV, [Venezuela MEM/USA-DOE Fossil Energy Report IV-1, IV-2, IV-3, IV-4, IV-5, IV-6, IV-7, and IV-8 (DOE/BETC/SP-83/15, DOE/BC-84/6/SP, DOE/BC-86/2/SP, DOE/BC-87/2/SP, DOE/BC-89/1/SP, DOE/BC-90/1/SP) DOE/BC-92/1/SP, DOE/BC-93/3/SP, and DOE/BC-95/3/SP] contain the results from the first 61 tasks. Those reports are dated April 1983, August 1984, March 1986, July 1! 987, November 1988, December 1989, October 1991, February 1993, and March 1995 respectively.

Izequeido, Alexandor

2001-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Comparative Sugar Recovery and Fermentation Data Following Pretreatment of Poplar Wood by Leading Technologies  

SciTech Connect

Through a Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation among Auburn University, Dartmouth College, Michigan State University, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Purdue University, Texas A&M University, the University of British Columbia, and the University of California at Riverside, leading pretreatment technologies based on ammonia fiber expansion, aqueous ammonia recycle, dilute sulfuric acid, lime, neutral pH, and sulfur dioxide were applied to a single source of poplar wood, and the remaining solids from each technology were hydrolyzed to sugars using the same enzymes. Identical analytical methods and a consistent material balance methodology were employed to develop comparative performance data for each combination of pretreatment and enzymes. Overall, compared to data with corn stover employed previously, the results showed that poplar was more recalcitrant to conversion to sugars and that sugar yields from the combined operations of pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis varied more among pretreatments. However, application of more severe pretreatment conditions gave good yields from sulfur dioxide and lime, and a recombinant yeast strain fermented the mixed stream of glucose and xylose sugars released by enzymatic hydrolysis of water washed solids from all pretreatments to ethanol with similarly high yields. An Agricultural and Industrial Advisory Board followed progress and helped steer the research to meet scientific and commercial needs.

Wyman, C. E.; Dale, B. E.; Elander, R. T.; Holtzapple, M.; Ladisch, M. R.; Lee, Y. Y.; Mitchinson, C.; Saddler, J. N.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

Emission Control and Elimination Through The Use Of Condensation and Heat Recovery Technologies- A Case Study  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Existing regulatory air requirements have created potential restrictions on current and future plant operations. Any process design that allows for the elimination of discharge points and the reduction of emissions at a major source can affect the strategic planning for the facility. This can provide critical flexibility, especially in fast-paced markets. Such a process design and implementation were undertaken at a ceramic capacitor manufacturing facility. This facility utilizes multiple small-scale solvent drying processes that emit volatile organic compounds (VOC's). These exhausts could be recirculated for the purposes of emission point elimination, heat recovery and solvent reuse. The aim was to create an environmental control process which would pay for itself within two to three years. An assessment of the alternatives was completed and standard HVAC-type condensation was selected. The unit operations for the proposed process consisted of a high efficiency air-to-air heat exchanger, cooling coil and a chiller. The air passing across the heat exchanger and coil would begin to dehumidify. In addition, solvents contained in the air stream would begin to condense to some equilibrium level and would be absorbed in the condensing water. Eventually, since there would be no addition of water in the process, the level of water in the condensate would fall off dramatically. A prototype unit capable of handling three ovens with a total air flow of 1200 ft3/min (cfm) was installed. The unit performed as expected with the exception that condensate concentrations remained low. Product testing was undertaken to ensure that returning air containing a low level of solvent would not adversely affect drying operations or product qualities. No adverse effects were found. Monitoring of the air stream verified solvent levels well below 5% of the lower explosive limit. Finally, a large-scale unit was constructed capable of handling up to 171 ovens at up to 68,000 cfm at a cost of $1.2M. At current levels of integration, cost avoidance (savings) performance is within 2% of predicted values. Projected payback is 18 months. Estimated volatile organic compound emission reduction is 100 tons per year.

Madewell, A. E.; Bullock, W. N.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

Effective Transfer of Waste Heat Recovery Technology: A Case Study of GTE Products Corporation's Experience  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

GTE Products Corporation recently completed a cost sharing technology acceleration program with the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Industrial Programs (Contract No. DE-FC01-80CS40330). The cost shared program called for the installation of 175 ceramic recuperators on 38 different furnace that operate with clean exhaust between 1600 F and 2500 F. The engineering team approach utilized by GTE for the system design, installation, and start-up-shakedown support is considered the major reason for the reported success of the GTE program. Savings attributable to recuperation averaged 38% based on energy audits by Battelle Columbus Laboratories. Battelle was contracted to monitor the furnaces before and after the retrofit by the D.O.E. and condense report and compare the data in terms of specific energy consumption vs. product throughout. Economic analysis shows that payback periods generally range from 1 - 2.5 years.

Gonzalez, J. M.

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2010 7, 2010 CX-002885: Categorical Exclusion Determination Abandonment and Closure of Domestic Wells 905-89G and 905-56G CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 05/27/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office May 27, 2010 CX-002536: Categorical Exclusion Determination American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Green Industry Business Development Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/27/2010 Location(s): Chicago, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office May 27, 2010 CX-002538: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tangent Grant Application for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Business Development Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/27/2010 Location(s): Aurora, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

162

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2469: Categorical Exclusion Determination 2469: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - City of Owasso - Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Fueling Infrastructure and CNG Vehicles CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/02/2010 Location(s): Owasso, Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office June 2, 2010 CX-002460: Categorical Exclusion Determination State of New Mexico American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Solar Projects CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/02/2010 Location(s): New Mexico Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office June 2, 2010 CX-003079: Categorical Exclusion Determination Applied Materials - Novel High Energy Density Lithium Ion Cell Designs CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/02/2010

163

Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies for Improved Recovery From Slope Basin Clastic reservoirs, Nash Draw Brushy Canyon Pool, Eddy County, New Mexico  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The overall goal of this project is to demonstrate that an advanced development drilling and pressure maintenance program based on advanced reservoir management methods can significantly improve oil recovery. The plan included developing a control area using standard reservoir management techniques and comparing its performance to an area developed using advanced methods. A key goal is to transfer advanced methodologies to oil and gas producers in the Permian Basin and elsewhere, and throughout the US oil and gas industry.

Mark B. Murphy

1998-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

164

Battleground Energy Recovery Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In October 2009, the project partners began a 36-month effort to develop an innovative, commercial-scale demonstration project incorporating state-of-the-art waste heat recovery technology at Clean Harbors, Inc., a large hazardous waste incinerator site located in Deer Park, Texas. With financial support provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, the Battleground Energy Recovery Project was launched to advance waste heat recovery solutions into the hazardous waste incineration market, an area that has seen little adoption of heat recovery in the United States. The goal of the project was to accelerate the use of energy-efficient, waste heat recovery technology as an alternative means to produce steam for industrial processes. The project had three main engineering and business objectives: Prove Feasibility of Waste Heat Recovery Technology at a Hazardous Waste Incinerator Complex; Provide Low-cost Steam to a Major Polypropylene Plant Using Waste Heat; and ? Create a Showcase Waste Heat Recovery Demonstration Project.

Daniel Bullock

2011-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

165

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Laboratory June 3, 2010 CX-002571: Categorical Exclusion Determination Street Lighting Fixture Energy Efficiency Retrofit Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 0603...

166

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12072009 Location(s): Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 7, 2009 CX-000459: Categorical...

167

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Non-Contaminating Cryogenic Fracturing Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12202011 Location(s): California Offices(s):...

168

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Non-Contaminating Cryogenic Fracturing Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12202011 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s):...

169

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory June 19, 2012 CX-008450: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building 93 Heat Exchanger Removal at National Energy Technology Laboratory Pittsburgh CX(s) Applied:...

170

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Grid Regional Demonstration - Technology Solutions for Wind Integration - Phase I CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05112010 Location(s): Austin, Texas Office(s):...

171

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Smart Grid Data Access Utilizing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education as a Catalyst - Phase 1 CX(s) Applied: A9,...

172

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 08312012 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 31, 2012 CX-009299: Categorical Exclusion...

173

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 4, 2011 CX-005159: Categorical Exclusion Determination United States-China Advanced Coal Technologies Consortium - Indiana Geological Survey CX(s) Applied: A9,...

174

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000368: Categorical Exclusion Determination New York State Alternative Fuel Vehicle & Infrastructure Deployment CX(s) Applied: A9, A11...

175

APPLICATION OF RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE RECOVERY AND ECONOMICS IN A LOWER QUALITY SHALLOW SHELF SAN ANDRES RESERVOIR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Class 2 Project at West Welch was designed to demonstrate the use of advanced technologies to enhance the economics of improved oil recovery (IOR) projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate (SSC) reservoirs, resulting in recovery of additional oil that would otherwise be left in the reservoir at project abandonment. Accurate reservoir description is critical to the effective evaluation and efficient design of IOR projects in the heterogeneous SSC reservoirs. Therefore, the majority of Budget Period 1 was devoted to reservoir characterization. Technologies being demonstrated include: (1) Advanced petrophysics; (2) Three-dimensional (3-D) seismic; (3) Crosswell bore tomography; (4) Advanced reservoir simulation; (5) Carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) stimulation treatments; (6) Hydraulic fracturing design and monitoring; and (7) Mobility control agents.

Raj Kumar; Keith Brown; T. Scott Hickman; James J. Justice

2000-04-27T23:59:59.000Z

176

APPLICATION OF RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE RECOVERY AND ECONOMICS IN A LOWER QUALITY SHALLOW SHELF SAN ANDRES RESERVOIR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Class 2 Project at West Welch was designed to demonstrate the use of advanced technologies to enhance the economics of improved oil recovery (IOR) projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate (SSC) reservoirs, resulting in recovery of additional oil that would otherwise be left in the reservoir at project abandonment. Accurate reservoir description is critical to the effective evaluation and efficient design of IOR projects in the heterogeneous SSC reservoirs. Therefore, the majority of Budget Period 1 was devoted to reservoir characterization. Technologies being demonstrated include: (1) Advanced petrophysics; (2) Three-dimensional (3-D) seismic; (3) Crosswell bore tomography; (4) Advanced reservoir simulation; (5) Carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) stimulation treatments; (6) Hydraulic fracturing design and monitoring; and (7) Mobility control agents.

T. Scott Hickman; James J. Justice

2001-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

177

APPLICATION OF RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE RECOVERY AND ECONOMICS IN A LOWER QUALITY SHALLOW SHELF SAN ANDRES RESERVOIR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Class 2 Project at West Welch was designed to demonstrate the use of advanced technologies to enhance the economics of improved oil recovery (IOR) projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate (SSC) reservoirs, resulting in recovery of additional oil that would otherwise be left in the reservoir at project abandonment. Accurate reservoir description is critical to the effective evaluation and efficient design of IOR projects in the heterogeneous SSC reservoirs. Therefore, the majority of Budget Period 1 was devoted to reservoir characterization. Technologies being demonstrated include: (1) Advanced petrophysics; (2) Three-dimensional (3-D) seismic; (3) Crosswell bore tomography; (4) Advanced reservoir simulation; (5) Carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) stimulation treatments; (6) Hydraulic fracturing design and monitoring; and (7) Mobility control agents.

T. Scott Hickman; James J. Justice

2001-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

178

APPLICATION OF RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE RECOVERY AND ECONOMICS IN A LOWER QUALITY SHALLOW SHELF SAN ANDRES RESERVOIR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Class 2 Project at West Welch was designed to demonstrate the use of advanced technologies to enhance the economics of improved oil recovery (IOR) projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate (SSC) reservoirs, resulting in recovery of additional oil that would otherwise be left in the reservoir at project abandonment. Accurate reservoir description is critical to the effective evaluation and efficient design of IOR projects in the heterogeneous SSC reservoirs. Therefore, the majority of Budget Period 1 was devoted to reservoir characterization. Technologies being demonstrated include: (1) Advanced petrophysics; (2) Three-dimensional (3-D) seismic; (3) Crosswell bore tomography; (4) Advanced reservoir simulation; (5) Carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) stimulation treatments; (6) Hydraulic fracturing design and monitoring; and (7) Mobility control agents.

T. Scott Hickman

2003-01-17T23:59:59.000Z

179

APPLICATION OF RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE RECOVERY AND ECONOMICS IN A LOWER QUALITY SHALLOW SHELF SAN ANDRES RESERVOIR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Class 2 Project at West Welch was designed to demonstrate the use of advanced technologies to enhance the economics of improved oil recovery (IOR) projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate (SSC) reservoirs, resulting in recovery of additional oil that would otherwise be left in the reservoir at project abandonment. Accurate reservoir description is critical to the effective evaluation and efficient design of IOR projects in the heterogeneous SSC reservoirs. Therefore, the majority of Budget Period 1 was devoted to reservoir characterization. Technologies being demonstrated include: (1) Advanced petrophysics; (2) Three-dimensional (3-D) seismic; (3) Crosswell bore tomography; (4) Advanced reservoir simulation; (5) Carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) stimulation treatments; (6) Hydraulic fracturing design and monitoring; and (7) Mobility control agents.

T. Scott Hickman; James J. Justice

2001-12-11T23:59:59.000Z

180

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery  

SciTech Connect

Research programs on enhanced recovery are briefly described. Major areas include: chemical flooding, gas displacement, thermal recovery processes, resource assessment technology, geoscience technology, microbial technology, and environmental technology.

Not Available

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Enhanced Oil Recovery | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery Thanks in part to innovations supported by the Office of Fossil Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory over the past 30 years,...

182

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2009 6, 2009 CX-000305: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Kentucky Revision 1 - Green Bank Loan Program - School for Deaf CX(s) Applied: B1.4, B1.5, B1.15, B1.22, B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 11/06/2009 Location(s): Kentucky Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 6, 2009 CX-000304: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Kentucky Revision 1 - Green Bank Loan Program - School for Blind CX(s) Applied: B1.4, B1.5, B1.15, B1.22, B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 11/06/2009 Location(s): Kentucky Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

183

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Determination Improving Reservoir Contact for Increased Production and Recovery of Gas Shale Reservoirs CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01212011 Location(s): Salt Lake City, Utah...

184

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Pennsylvania Green Energy Works Targeted Grant - Biogas - Furmano Foods Biogas Recovery and Utilization CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B5.1 Date: 02...

185

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2010 CX-004108: Categorical Exclusion Determination Green Oil: Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery for America?s Small Oil Producers CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 09302010...

186

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Dioxide-Water Emulsions For Enhanced Oil Recovery And Permanent Sequestration Of Carbon Dioxide CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6...

187

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14, 2013 CX-009857: Categorical Exclusion Determination Seismic Stimulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6, B3.7 Date: 01142013 Location(s): Texas...

188

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-003355: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act- Phase 2 - Wind Turbine for Guthrie Waste Water Treatment Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/09/2010 Location(s): Guthrie, Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 9, 2010 CX-003354: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning and Window Replacement in Administration Building CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/09/2010 Location(s): Shawnee, Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 9, 2010 CX-003353: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -

189

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2010 30, 2010 CX-003509: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Energy Innovations Expansion of Solar Module Production Lines CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/30/2010 Location(s): Poway, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 30, 2010 CX-003506: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Quantum Solar Photovoltaic Module Manufacturing Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/30/2010 Location(s): Irvine, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 30, 2010 CX-003505: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Calisolar's

190

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2010 8, 2010 CX-004028: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program - Brevini Wind United States of America, Incorporated CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10/08/2010 Location(s): Yorktown, Indiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office October 8, 2010 CX-004027: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program - Cedar Rapids Linn County Solid Waste Agency Landfill Gas Cogeneration Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10/08/2010 Location(s): Cedar Rapids, Iowa Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office October 8, 2010 CX-004021: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Solaria Photovoltaic Manufacturing Facility CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10/08/2010

191

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11, 2010 11, 2010 CX-001935: Categorical Exclusion Determination Deployment of Innovative Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy - Residential Buildings CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/11/2010 Location(s): Oregon Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 10, 2010 CX-001931: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program (SEP) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) - New Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Fueling Stations CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/10/2010 Location(s): Cherokee County, Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 10, 2010 CX-006361: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tennessee-City-Johnson City CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/10/2010 Location(s): Johnson City, Tennessee

192

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2010 30, 2010 CX-002115: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fos Biofuels CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/30/2010 Location(s): Chicago, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 30, 2010 CX-002114: Categorical Exclusion Determination Illinois State Energy Program Solar Project - Austin Building Corporation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/30/2010 Location(s): Chicago, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 30, 2010 CX-002110: Categorical Exclusion Determination Colorado State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - Capital Investment New Energy Economic Development - B&H Industries Photovoltaic CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/30/2010 Location(s): Rocky Ford, Colorado Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

193

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2010 7, 2010 CX-001827: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Finding Large Aperture Fractures in Geothermal Resource Areas Using a 3-Component Long-Offset Surface Seismic Survey, PSlnSAR and Kinematic Structural Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.1, A9 Date: 04/27/2010 Location(s): Washoe County, Nevada Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 26, 2010 CX-001951: Categorical Exclusion Determination Preparation of Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy CX(s) Applied: A8, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/26/2010 Location(s): Perth Amboy, New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy April 26, 2010 CX-001950: Categorical Exclusion Determination Preparation of Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Application CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1

194

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

917: Categorical Exclusion Determination 917: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - National Environmental Policy Act Template (T) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/20/2010 Location(s): Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 20, 2010 CX-001913: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wind Power Project - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/20/2010 Location(s): Peru, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 20, 2010 CX-001909: Categorical Exclusion Determination MRC Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Recycling Facility CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/20/2010 Location(s): Chicago, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

195

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 8, 2010 February 8, 2010 CX-001085: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy for State Buildings and Schools CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 02/08/2010 Location(s): Nevada, Nevada Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 8, 2010 CX-001103: Categorical Exclusion Determination State of South Carolina American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (T) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 02/08/2010 Location(s): South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 7, 2010 CX-000766: Categorical Exclusion Determination New York State Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Infrastructure Deployment - New Vehicle Purchase CX(s) Applied: A7, A11

196

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 18, 2011 February 18, 2011 CX-005273: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/18/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 18, 2011 CX-005271: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/18/2011 Location(s): Waxhaw, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 18, 2011 CX-005258: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/18/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 18, 2011

197

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2009 3, 2009 CX-000387: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Alameda, California CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 11/13/2009 Location(s): Livermore, California Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 13, 2009 CX-000386: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - Alameda, California CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 11/13/2009 Location(s): Berkley, California Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 13, 2009 CX-000384: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Dioxide Capture Site Survey in California CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.1 Date: 11/13/2009 Location(s): Contra Costa County, California Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

198

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2010 3, 2010 CX-003824: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewable Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.24, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 09/13/2010 Location(s): Kellenberg, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 13, 2010 CX-003823: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewable Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.24, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 09/13/2010 Location(s): Bronx, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 13, 2010 CX-003822: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewable Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.24, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 09/13/2010 Location(s): New York City, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

199

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2010 22, 2010 CX-000710: Categorical Exclusion Determination Virginia Revision 3 - Economic Development Market Title CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 01/22/2010 Location(s): Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 22, 2010 CX-000735: Categorical Exclusion Determination Catalytic Transformation of Waste Carbon Dioxide into Valuable Products CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 01/22/2010 Location(s): Newtown Square, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 22, 2010 CX-000736: Categorical Exclusion Determination Catalytic Transformation of Waste Carbon Dioxide into Valuable Products CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 01/22/2010 Location(s): Cincinnati, Ohio Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

200

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2010 7, 2010 CX-001326: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development and Utilization of Host Materials for White Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/17/2010 Location(s): Rochester, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 17, 2010 CX-001325: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project - Biodiesel Station CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/17/2010 Location(s): Springfield, Missouri Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 17, 2010 CX-001324: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Central Texas Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Investments (Dallas - 2) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/17/2010

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

PON08010 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Cost Share: Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

PON08010 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Cost Share: Alternative Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) and Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs). 15) A public entity and implementation of those vehicles. Will the budget breakdown include vehicle manufacturer costs involved? If so

202

Available Technologies: Football Wrench  

Energy Efficiency; Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies. Monitoring and Imaging; Remediation; Modeling; Imaging ...

203

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-003050: Categorical Exclusion Determination Irvine Smart Grid Demonstration Project CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6, B4.6, B5.1 Date: 07/19/2010 Location(s): Irvine, California Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 19, 2010 CX-003049: Categorical Exclusion Determination Public Serving Institutions - Folsom School Parking Lot Lights Project CX(s) Applied: B2.3, B5.1 Date: 07/19/2010 Location(s): North Hero, Vermont Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 19, 2010 CX-003048: Categorical Exclusion Determination Training Program Development for Commercial Building Equipment Technicians CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 07/19/2010 Location(s): College Station, Texas

204

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 9, 2010 December 9, 2010 CX-004649: Categorical Exclusion Determination The Painesville Municipal Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demonstration Program CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/09/2010 Location(s): Painesville, Ohio Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2010 CX-004648: Categorical Exclusion Determination The Painesville Municipal Power Vanadium Redox Battery Demonstration Program CX(s) Applied: A11, B3.6, B5.1 Date: 12/09/2010 Location(s): Johnstown, Pennsylvania Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2010 CX-004641: Categorical Exclusion Determination Integrated Whole Building Energy Diagnostics CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 12/09/2010

205

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2011 0, 2011 CX-005214: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chicago Area Alternative Fuels Deployment Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/10/2011 Location(s): Downers Grove, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 10, 2011 CX-005213: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chicago Area Alternative Fuels Deployment Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/10/2011 Location(s): Wheaton, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 10, 2011 CX-005265: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hybrid Vehicle Purchase Project CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/10/2011 Location(s): Moline, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy February 9, 2011

206

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2010 1, 2010 CX-004307: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program - Minesh CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 11/01/2010 Location(s): Litchfield, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 1, 2010 CX-004306: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program: Non-Utility Scale Renewable Energy Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/01/2010 Location(s): Pawtucket, Rhode Island Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 1, 2010 CX-004305: Categorical Exclusion Determination Commercial Renewable Energy Systems - Myers Park Baptist Church Solar CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 11/01/2010 Location(s): Charlotte, North Carolina

207

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81: Categorical Exclusion Determination 81: Categorical Exclusion Determination Commercial Renewable Energy Systems - Pisgah Inn Solar CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/01/2010 Location(s): Waynesville, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 1, 2010 CX-001482: Categorical Exclusion Determination Commercial Renewable Energy Systems - Remington Arms Solar CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 04/01/2010 Location(s): Madison, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 1, 2010 CX-001400: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nye County Energy Efficiency Projects CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/01/2010 Location(s): Nye County, Nevada Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

208

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-000977: Categorical Exclusion Determination Virginia Women's Correction Center Biomass and Biodiesel Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/19/2010 Location(s): Goochland County, Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 19, 2010 CX-000976: Categorical Exclusion Determination Town of Christiansburg Wastewater Treatment Plant Combined Heat and Power from Biogas CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.31, B5.1 Date: 02/19/2010 Location(s): Christiansburg, Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 19, 2010 CX-000975: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rockingham Memorial Hospital Methane Gas Conversion CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/19/2010 Location(s): Rockingham County, Virginia

209

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-002976: Categorical Exclusion Determination Propane Corridor Development Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, B5.1 Date: 07/09/2010 Location(s): Pelzer, South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 9, 2010 CX-002974: Categorical Exclusion Determination Propane Corridor Development Program - Greenville, South Carolina CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, B5.1 Date: 07/09/2010 Location(s): South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 9, 2010 CX-002972: Categorical Exclusion Determination Propane Corridor Development Program - Traveler's Rest, South Carolina CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, B5.1 Date: 07/09/2010 Location(s): South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

210

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12, 2010 12, 2010 CX-003381: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program -Gordon CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 08/12/2010 Location(s): Avon, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2010 CX-003380: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program -McCuda CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 08/12/2010 Location(s): East Windsor, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2010 CX-003379: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program -Maheu CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 08/12/2010 Location(s): Coventry, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

211

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 25, 2011 August 25, 2011 CX-006516: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 08/25/2011 Location(s): Durham, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 25, 2011 CX-006515: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 08/25/2011 Location(s): Lincoln, Nebraska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 24, 2011 CX-006570: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Dakota-Tribe-Standing Rock Sioux Tribe CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B5.1 Date: 08/24/2011 Location(s): Fort Yates, North Dakota Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy August 24, 2011 CX-006569: Categorical Exclusion Determination

212

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

681: Categorical Exclusion Determination 681: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): Austin, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 22, 2010 CX-001679: Categorical Exclusion Determination Manufacture of Battery Containers for Lithium Ion Batteries for the Aerospace and Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV) Markets CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.31, B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 22, 2010 CX-001677: Categorical Exclusion Determination Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Infrastructure Program (Republic Services of Florida) CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.31, B2.5, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010

213

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2010 22, 2010 CX-002811: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Energy Development Fund - Renewable Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 06/22/2010 Location(s): South Burlington, Vermont Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 22, 2010 CX-002810: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pennsylvania Geothermal Fund Market Title CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 06/22/2010 Location(s): Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 22, 2010 CX-002789: Categorical Exclusion Determination California-Tribe-Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/22/2010 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

214

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 2010 21, 2010 CX-000967: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency in State Buildings: West Virginia Department of Agriculture CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/21/2010 Location(s): West Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 21, 2010 CX-000966: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency in State Buildings: Higher Education CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/21/2010 Location(s): West Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 21, 2010 CX-000965: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency in State Buildings: Administration CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/21/2010 Location(s): West Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

215

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2010 30, 2010 CX-003320: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewable Energy Program - Eastern Long Island Solar Project CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 07/30/2010 Location(s): Suffolk County, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 30, 2010 CX-003318: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.7, B4.4, B5.1 Date: 07/30/2010 Location(s): Kennewick, Washington Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 30, 2010 CX-003501: Categorical Exclusion Determination Community-Wide Public Facilities Energy Efficiency Retrofit and Biomass Space Heating Conversion Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1

216

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2011 0, 2011 CX-005788: Categorical Exclusion Determination Connecticut-City-Milford CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 05/10/2011 Location(s): Milford, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy May 9, 2011 CX-005824: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grants to Promote Mid-size Renewables at Private and Government Buildings - Ocean Landings CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 05/09/2011 Location(s): Berlin, Maryland Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 5, 2011 CX-005827: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/05/2011 Location(s): Leawood, Kansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

217

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2010 30, 2010 CX-004581: Categorical Exclusion Determination Re-Utilization of Industrial Carbon Dioxide for Algae Production Using a Phase Change Material CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 11/30/2010 Location(s): Wooster, Ohio Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 30, 2010 CX-004580: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/30/2010 Location(s): Glastonbury, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 29, 2010 CX-004812: Categorical Exclusion Determination Relocation of Trailer 704-29G to P-Area CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 11/29/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 29, 2010

218

THERMAL RECOVERY  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

THERMAL RECOVERY Thermal recovery comprises the techniques of steamflooding, cyclic steam stimulation, and in situ combustion. In steamflooding, high-temperature steam is injected...

219

Improved Oil Recovery from Upper Jurassic Smackover Carbonates through the Application of Advanced Technologies at Womack Hill Oil Field, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Eastern Gulf Costal Plain  

SciTech Connect

Pruet Production Co. and the Center for Sedimentary Basin Studies at the University of Alabama, in cooperation with Texas A&M University, Mississippi State University, University of Mississippi, and Wayne Stafford and Associates proposed a three-phase, focused, comprehensive, integrated and multidisciplinary study of Upper Jurassic Smackover carbonates (Class II Reservoir), involving reservoir characterization and 3-D modeling (Phase I) and a field demonstration project (Phases II and III) at Womack Hill Field Unit, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Alabama, eastern Gulf Coastal Plain. Phase I of the project has been completed. The principal objectives of the project are: increasing the productivity and profitability of the Womack Hill Field Unit, thereby extending the economic life of this Class II Reservoir and transferring effectively and in a timely manner the knowledge gained and technology developed from this project to producers who are operating other domestic fields with Class II Reservoirs. The major tasks of the project included reservoir characterization, recovery technology analysis, recovery technology evaluation, and the decision to implement a demonstration project. Reservoir characterization consisted of geoscientific reservoir characterization, petrophysical and engineering property characterization, microbial characterization, and integration of the characterization data. Recovery technology analysis included 3-D geologic modeling, reservoir simulation, and microbial core experiments. Recovery technology evaluation consisted of acquiring and evaluating new high quality 2-D seismic data, evaluating the existing pressure maintenance project in the Womack Hill Field Unit, and evaluating the concept of an immobilized enzyme technology project for the Womack Hill Field Unit. The decision to implement a demonstration project essentially resulted in the decision on whether to conduct an infill drilling project in Womack Hill Field. Reservoir performance, multiwell productivity analysis, and reservoir simulation studies indicate that water injection continues to provide stable support to maintain production from wells in the western unitized area of the field and that the strong water drive present in the eastern area of the field is adequate to sustain production from this part of the field. Although the results from the microbial characterization and microbial core experiments are very promising, it is recommended that an immobilized enzyme technology project not be implemented in the Womack Hill Field Unit until live (freshly taken and properly preserved) cores from the Smackover reservoir in the field are acquired to confirm the microbial core experiments to date. From 3-D geologic modeling, reservoir performance analysis, and reservoir simulation, four areas in the Womack Hill Field were identified as prospective infill drilling sites to recover undrained oil from the field. It was determined that the two areas in the unit area probably can be effectively drained by perforating higher zones in the Smackover reservoir in currently producing wells. The two areas in the eastern (non-unitized) part of the field require the drilling of new wells. The successful drilling and testing of a well in 2003 by J. R. Pounds, Inc. has proven the oil potential of the easternmost site in the non-unitized part of the field. Pruet Production Co. acquired new 2-D seismic data to evaluate the oil potential of the westernmost site. Because of the effects of a fault shadow from the major fault bounding the southern border of the Womack Hill Field, it is difficult to evaluate conclusively this potential drill site. Pruet Production Co. has decided not to drill this new well at this time and to further evaluate the new 2-D seismic profiles after these data have been processed using a pre-stack migration technique. Pruet Production Co. has elected not to continue into Phase II of this project because they are not prepared to make a proposal to the other mineral interest owners regarding the drilling of new wells as part of an infil

Ernest A. Mancini

2006-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

220

Improved Oil Recovery from Upper Jurassic Smackover Carbonates through the Application of Advanced Technologies at Womack Hill Oil Field, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Eastern Gulf Coastal Plain  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Pruet Production Co. and the Center for Sedimentary Basin Studies at the University of Alabama, in cooperation with Texas A&M University, Mississippi State University, University of Mississippi, and Wayne Stafford and Associates proposed a three-phase, focused, comprehensive, integrated and multidisciplinary study of Upper Jurassic Smackover carbonates (Class II Reservoir), involving reservoir characterization and 3-D modeling (Phase I) and a field demonstration project (Phases II and III) at Womack Hill Field Unit, Choctaw and Clarke Counties, Alabama, eastern Gulf Coastal Plain. Phase I of the project has been completed. The principal objectives of the project are: increasing the productivity and profitability of the Womack Hill Field Unit, thereby extending the economic life of this Class II Reservoir and transferring effectively and in a timely manner the knowledge gained and technology developed from this project to producers who are operating other domestic fields with Class II Reservoirs. The major tasks of the project included reservoir characterization, recovery technology analysis, recovery technology evaluation, and the decision to implement a demonstration project. Reservoir characterization consisted of geoscientific reservoir characterization, petrophysical and engineering property characterization, microbial characterization, and integration of the characterization data. Recovery technology analysis included 3-D geologic modeling, reservoir simulation, and microbial core experiments. Recovery technology evaluation consisted of acquiring and evaluating new high quality 2-D seismic data, evaluating the existing pressure maintenance project in the Womack Hill Field Unit, and evaluating the concept of an immobilized enzyme technology project for the Womack Hill Field Unit. The decision to implement a demonstration project essentially resulted in the decision on whether to conduct an infill drilling project in Womack Hill Field. Reservoir performance, multiwell productivity analysis, and reservoir simulation studies indicate that water injection continues to provide stable support to maintain production from wells in the western unitized area of the field and that the strong water drive present in the eastern area of the field is adequate to sustain production from this part of the field. Although the results from the microbial characterization and microbial core experiments are very promising, it is recommended that an immobilized enzyme technology project not be implemented in the Womack Hill Field Unit until live (freshly taken and properly preserved) cores from the Smackover reservoir in the field are acquired to confirm the microbial core experiments to date. From 3-D geologic modeling, reservoir performance analysis, and reservoir simulation, four areas in the Womack Hill Field were identified as prospective infill drilling sites to recover undrained oil from the field. It was determined that the two areas in the unit area probably can be effectively drained by perforating higher zones in the Smackover reservoir in currently producing wells. The two areas in the eastern (non-unitized) part of the field require the drilling of new wells. The successful drilling and testing of a well in 2003 by J. R. Pounds, Inc. has proven the oil potential of the easternmost site in the non-unitized part of the field. Pruet Production Co. acquired new 2-D seismic data to evaluate the oil potential of the westernmost site. Because of the effects of a fault shadow from the major fault bounding the southern border of the Womack Hill Field, it is difficult to evaluate conclusively this potential drill site. Pruet Production Co. has decided not to drill this new well at this time and to further evaluate the new 2-D seismic profiles after these data have been processed using a pre-stack migration technique. Pruet Production Co. has elected not to continue into Phase II of this project because they are not prepared to make a proposal to the other mineral interest owners regarding the drilling of new wells as part of an infil

Ernest A. Mancini

2003-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2011 6, 2011 CX-005433: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority Large System Application Request N CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/16/2011 Location(s): Oklahoma Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 16, 2011 CX-005429: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -Solid Waste Authority of Central Ohio CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/16/2011 Location(s): Grove City, Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 16, 2011 CX-005425: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Brookhaven New York: Henrietta Acampora Recreation Center

222

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-001081: Categorical Exclusion Determination State of Montana Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (T) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 02/09/2010 Location(s): Montana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 9, 2010 CX-001082: Categorical Exclusion Determination State of New Hampshire Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (T) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 02/09/2010 Location(s): New Hampshire, New Hampshire Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February 9, 2010 CX-001088: Categorical Exclusion Determination City of New York American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (S)

223

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2010 8, 2010 CX-002902: Categorical Exclusion Determination DeKalb County/Metropolitan Atlanta Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Vehicle Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, B5.1 Date: 07/08/2010 Location(s): Tucker, Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 8, 2010 CX-002901: Categorical Exclusion Determination DeKalb County/Metropolitan Atlanta Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Vehicle Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, B5.1 Date: 07/08/2010 Location(s): East Point, Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 8, 2010 CX-002900: Categorical Exclusion Determination DeKalb County/Metropolitan Atlanta Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Vehicle Project

224

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Cost Share: Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

://www.netl.doe.gov/business/solicitations/index.html (g) DOE EERE Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program http://www.eecbg.energy.gov/ (h) DOE EERE Vehicle Technologies Program http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/financial/index.html (i) DOE EERE Biomass Program Solicitations http://www1.eere

225

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12, 2011 12, 2011 CX-005692: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program Illinois Green Industry Business Development and Large Customer Energy Efficiency Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/12/2011 Location(s): Peoria, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 11, 2011 CX-005595: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, B5.1 Date: 04/11/2011 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 11, 2011 CX-005734: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Solar Compactors and Recycling Units CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/11/2011 Location(s): Richmond, Virginia

226

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2010 3, 2010 CX-002430: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rattlesnake-Garrison Number-1 Wood Pole Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B4.6, B1.3 Date: 05/13/2010 Location(s): Missoula County, Montana Office(s): Bonneville Power Administration May 13, 2010 CX-002238: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evaluation of Instrumentation and Dynamic Thermal Circuit Rating (DTCR) for Overhead Lines CX(s) Applied: B3.11, B4.6 Date: 05/13/2010 Location(s): St. Lawrence County, New York Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 13, 2010 CX-002575: Categorical Exclusion Determination Blacksburg Virginia: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Plan Development CX(s) Applied: B2.5, A1, A9, B1.2, B5.1 Date: 05/13/2010 Location(s): Blacksburg, Virginia

227

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 27, 2011 January 27, 2011 CX-005127: Categorical Exclusion Determination Philadelphia (Pennsylvania): Energy Loan to Community Legal Services for the Erie Avenue Office CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/27/2011 Location(s): Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office January 27, 2011 CX-005076: Categorical Exclusion Determination Jefferson County Sheriff's Department Propane Infrastructure Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/27/2011 Location(s): Jefferson, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 27, 2011 CX-005068: Categorical Exclusion Determination City of Riverside, California CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 01/27/2011 Location(s): Riverside, California

228

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 2011 21, 2011 CX-006348: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Carolina-County-Davidson CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Davidson County, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 21, 2011 CX-006339: Categorical Exclusion Determination Minnesota-City-Brooklyn Park CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Brooklyn Park, Minnesota Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 21, 2011 CX-006133: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): New Canaan, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 21, 2011 CX-006130: Categorical Exclusion Determination

229

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

19, 2010 19, 2010 CX-000858: Categorical Exclusion Determination Joint BioEnergy Institute Lease and Operation of Greenhouses at University of California at Davis CX(s) Applied: A7, B1.3, B1.15, B3.6 Date: 01/19/2010 Location(s): Davis, California Office(s): Science, Berkeley Site Office January 18, 2010 CX-000705: Categorical Exclusion Determination Florida - Sunshine State Buildings Parking Lot Canopies - State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.24, B2.1, B5.1 Date: 01/18/2010 Location(s): Tallahassee, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 18, 2010 CX-000706: Categorical Exclusion Determination Florida - Compressed Natural Gas Fleet Fueling - State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.24, B1.31, B2.5, B5.1

230

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31, 2010 31, 2010 CX-001532: Categorical Exclusion Determination City of Orlando - Statement of Work (S) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/31/2010 Location(s): Orlando, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 31, 2010 CX-001516: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency Audits CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/31/2010 Location(s): Pinal County, Arizona Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 31, 2010 CX-001526: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advance Technology Energy Efficient Equipment - Various County Central Chiller Plants CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/31/2010 Location(s): San Diego County, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

231

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2009 5, 2009 CX-000286: Categorical Exclusion Determination Engineer, Assemble, and Test Electrified Vehicle Drive Electronics CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B5.1, B1.31 Date: 12/15/2009 Location(s): Fargo, North Dakota Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 15, 2009 CX-000235: Categorical Exclusion Determination California City Fresno CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 12/15/2009 Location(s): Fresno, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 14, 2009 CX-001266: Categorical Exclusion Determination Develop Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/14/2009 Location(s): Kennebec, Maine Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy December 14, 2009

232

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18, 2009 18, 2009 CX-000250: Categorical Exclusion Determination WA County Kitsap CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 12/18/2009 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 18, 2009 CX-000142: Categorical Exclusion Determination Village of Venetie Energy Distribution Project CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 12/18/2009 Location(s): Venetie, Alaska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy December 18, 2009 CX-000141: Categorical Exclusion Determination Village of Kaltag Energy Audits CX(s) Applied: B5.1, A9, A11 Date: 12/18/2009 Location(s): Kaltag, Alaska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy December 18, 2009 CX-000140: Categorical Exclusion Determination Shageluk Native Village Renewable Energy Technology - Solar

233

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2010 0, 2010 CX-002214: Categorical Exclusion Determination Susanville Indian Rancheria Portfolio Manager Tool CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 05/10/2010 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy May 10, 2010 CX-002355: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kansas City Power and Light (KCP&L) Green Impact Zone Smart Grid Demonstration CX(s) Applied: B4.6, A1, A9, A11, B1.7, B4.11, B5.1 Date: 05/10/2010 Location(s): Kansas City, Missouri Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 10, 2010 CX-002351: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interstate Electrification Improvement CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 05/10/2010 Location(s): Portland, Oregon Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

234

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2010 2, 2010 CX-004765: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program - Building Code Technical Assistance CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 12/22/2010 Location(s): Maryland Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 22, 2010 CX-004838: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recycling of Solar Panels CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/22/2010 Location(s): Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 22, 2010 CX-004834: Categorical Exclusion Determination Scott Jenkins Parking Lot Light Emitting Diode Lighting with Solar Arrays and On?site Electric Vehicle Charging Stations CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/22/2010 Location(s): Loudoun County, Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

235

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 8, 2011 August 8, 2011 CX-006456: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fuel Cell Program CX(s) Applied: A1, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 08/08/2011 Location(s): Weston, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 5, 2011 CX-006422: Categorical Exclusion Determination New York-City-Tonawanda, Town of CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/05/2011 Location(s): Tonawanda, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy August 4, 2011 CX-006471: Categorical Exclusion Determination Air Awareness Campaign Electric Car Charging Station CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/04/2011 Location(s): Greenville, South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 4, 2011 CX-006455: Categorical Exclusion Determination

236

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 25, 2011 March 25, 2011 CX-005548: Categorical Exclusion Determination Crittendon County Courthouse Window Replacement and Building Lighting Retrofit CX(s) Applied: A1, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/25/2011 Location(s): Crittendon County, Arkansas Office(s): Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 25, 2011 CX-005478: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Energy Grants - City of Marianna CX(s) Applied: A1, B1.4, B5.1, B5.2 Date: 03/25/2011 Location(s): Marianna, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 24, 2011 CX-005523: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Bellevue CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/24/2011 Location(s): Bellevue, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

237

Available Technologies: Sugar Extraction and Ionic Liquid ...  

APPLICATIONS OF TECHNOLOGY: Biomass pretreatment for biofuel production; Recovery of products using biphasic liquid-liquid extraction; Recovery and ...

238

Venezuela-MEM/USA-DOE Fossil Energy Report XIII-1, Supporting Technology for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Microbial EOR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The results from Annex XIII of the Cooperative Agreement between the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and the Ministry of Energy and Mines of the Republic of Venezuela (MEMV) have been documented and published with many researchers involved. Integrate comprehensive research programs in the area of Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR) ranged from feasibility laboratory studies to full-scale multi-well field pilots. The objective, to cooperate in a technical exchange of ideas and information was fully met throughout the life of the Annex. Information has been exchanged between the two countries through published reports and technical meetings between experts in both country's research communities. The meetings occurred every two years in locations coincident with the International MEOR conferences & workshops sponsored by DOE (June 1990, University of Oklahoma, September 1992, Brookhaven, September 1995, National Institute of Petroleum and Energy Research). Reports and publications produced during these years are listed in Appendix B. Several Annex managers have guided the exchange through the years. They included Luis Vierma, Jose Luis Zirritt, representing MEMV and E. B. Nuckols, Edith Allison, and Rhonda Lindsey, representing the U.S. DOE. Funding for this area of research remained steady for a few years but decreased in recent years. Because both countries have reduced research programs in this area, future exchanges on this topic will occur through ANNEX XV. Informal networks established between researchers through the years should continue to function between individuals in the two countries.

Ziritt, Jose Luis

1999-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

239

Venezuela-MEM/USA-DOE Fossil Energy Report IV-11: Supporting technology for enhanced oil recovery - EOR thermal processes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains the results of efforts under the six tasks of the Tenth Amendment anti Extension of Annex IV, Enhanced Oil Recovery Thermal Processes of the Venezuela/USA Energy Agreement. This report is presented in sections (for each of the six Tasks) and each section contains one or more reports that were prepared to describe the results of the effort under each of the Tasks. A statement of each Task, taken from the Agreement Between Project Managers, is presented on the first page of each section. The Tasks are numbered 68 through 73. The first through tenth report on research performed under Annex IV Venezuela MEM/USA-DOE Fossil Energy Report Number IV-1, IV-2, IV-3, IV-4, IV-5, IV-6, IV-7, IV-8, IV-9, IV-10 contain the results of the first 67 Tasks. These reports are dated April 1983, August 1984, March 1986, July 1987, November 1988, December 1989, October 1991, February 1993, March 1995, and December 1997, respectively.

Venezuela

2000-04-06T23:59:59.000Z

240

Solid-State Lighting Recovery Act Award Selections | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solid-State Lighting Recovery Act Award Selections Solid-State Lighting Recovery Act Award Selections A chart highlighting core technology research projects and product development...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Technology Development | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technology Development Electricity Advisory Committee Technology Development Smart Grid Demand Response Federal Smart Grid Task Force Distributed Energy Recovery Act...

242

Demonstration of Air-Power-Assist Engine Technology for Clean Combustion and Direct Energy Recovery in Heavy Duty Application  

SciTech Connect

The first phase of the project consists of four months of applied research, starting from September 1, 2005 and was completed by December 31, 2005. During this time, the project team heavily relied on highly detailed numerical modeling techniques to evaluate the feasibility of the APA technology. Specifically, (i) A GT-Power{sup TM}engine simulation model was constructed to predict engine efficiency at various operating conditions. Efficiency was defined based on the second-law thermodynamic availability. (ii) The engine efficiency map generated by the engine simulation was then fed into a simplified vehicle model, which was constructed in the Matlab/Simulink environment, to predict fuel consumption of a refuse truck on a simple collection cycle. (iii) Design and analysis work supporting the concept of retrofitting an existing Sturman Industries Hydraulic Valve Actuation (HVA) system with the modifications that are required to run the HVA system with Air Power Assist functionality. A Matlab/Simulink model was used to calculate the dynamic response of the HVA system. Computer aided design (CAD) was done in Solidworks for mechanical design and hydraulic layout. At the end of Phase I, 11% fuel economy improvement was predicted. During Phase II, the engine simulation group completed the engine mapping work. The air handling group made substantial progress in identifying suppliers and conducting 3D modelling design. Sturman Industries completed design modification of the HVA system, which was reviewed and accepted by Volvo Powertrain. In Phase II, the possibility of 15% fuel economy improvement was shown with new EGR cooler design by reducing EGR cooler outlet temperature with APA engine technology from Air Handling Group. In addition, Vehicle Simulation with APA technology estimated 4 -21% fuel economy improvement over a wide range of driving cycles. During Phase III, the engine experimental setup was initiated at VPTNA, Hagerstown, MD. Air Handling system and HVA system were delivered to VPTNA and then assembly of APA engine was completed by June 2007. Functional testing of APA engine was performed and AC and AM modes testing were completed by October 2007. After completing testing, data analysis and post processing were performed. Especially, the models were instrumental in identifying some of the key issues with the experimental HVA system. Based upon the available engine test results during AC and AM modes, the projected fuel economy improvement over the NY composite cycle is 14.7%. This is close to but slightly lower than the originally estimated 18% from ADVISOR simulation. The APA project group demonstrated the concept of APA technology by using simulation and experimental testing. However, there are still exists of technical challenges to meet the original expectation of APA technology. The enabling technology of this concept, i.e. a fully flexible valve actuation system that can handle high back pressure from the exhaust manifold is identified as one of the major technical challenges for realizing the APA concept.

Hyungsuk Kang; Chun Tai

2010-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

Technology assessment: environmental, health, and safety impacts associated with oil recovery from US tar-sand deposits  

SciTech Connect

The tar-sand resources of the US have the potential to yield as much as 36 billion barrels (bbls) of oil. The tar-sand petroleum-extraction technologies now being considered for commercialization in the United States include both surface (above ground) systems and in situ (underground) procedures. The surface systems currently receiving the most attention include: (1) thermal decomposition processes (retorting); (2) suspension methods (solvent extraction); and (3) washing techniques (water separation). Underground bitumen extraction techniques now being field tested are: (1) in situ combustion; and (2) in situ steam-injection procedures. At this time, any commercial tar-sand facility in the US will have to comply with at least 7 major federal regulations in addition to state regulations; building, electrical, and fire codes; and petroleum-industry construction standards. Pollution-control methods needed by tar-sand technologies to comply with regulatory standards and to protect air, land, and water quality will probably be similar to those already proposed for commercial oil-shale systems. The costs of these systems could range from about $1.20 to $2.45 per barrel of oil produced. Estimates of potential pollution-emisson levels affecting land, air, and water were calculated from available data related to current surface and in situ tar-sand field experiments in the US. These data were then extrapolated to determine pollutant levels expected from conceptual commercial surface and in situ facilities producing 20,000 bbl/d. The likelihood-of-occurrence of these impacts was then assessed. Experience from other industries, including information concerning health and ecosystem damage from air pollutants, measurements of ground-water transport of organic pollutants, and the effectiveness of environmental-control technologies was used to make this assessment.

Daniels, J.I.; Anspaugh, L.R.; Ricker, Y.E.

1981-10-13T23:59:59.000Z

244

Available Technologies: Improved Xylan Extraction  

Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies. Monitoring and Imaging; Remediation; Modeling; Imaging & Lasers.

245

Technology for the Recovery of Fuel and Adsorbent Carbons from Coal Burning Utility Ash Ponds and Landfills  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Several sampling techniques were evaluated to recover representative core samples from the ash ponds at Western Kentucky Energy's Coleman Station. The most successful was a combination of continuous-flight augers and specially designed soft-sediment sampling tubes driven by a Hammerhead drill mounted on an amphibious ARGO vehicle. A total of 51 core samples were recovered and analyzed in 3 ft sections and it was determined that there are 1,354,974 tons of ash in Pond C. Of the over 1.35M tons of ash present, 14% or 190K tons can be considered as coarse (+100 mesh). Pond C contains approximately 88K tons of carbon, nearly half of which is coarse and potentially recoverable with spiral concentration while the fine carbon (-100 mesh) is recoverable with froth flotation. There are 1.27M tons of carbon-free ash, 12% of which is coarse and potentially usable as block sand. Spiral concentration testing on bulk samples showed that product grade of 30 to 38% C (4200 to 5500 Btu/lb) was obtainable. When this product was cleaned again in an additional stage of spiral concentration, the product grade was improved to 7200 to 8200 Btu/lb with an accompanying 13 to 29% decrease in yield. Release analysis of hydraulically classified pond ash showed that froth flotation could provide froth products with as high a grade as 9000 Btu/lb with a yield of 5%. Increasing yield to 10% reduced froth grade to 7000 Btu/lb. Batch flotation provided froth grades as high as 6500 Btu/lb with yields of 7% with 1.5 lb/ton SPP and 1 lb/ton frother. Column flotation test results were similar to those achieved in batch flotation in terms of both grade and yield, however, carbon recoveries were lower (50% carbon recovery and using wash water improved froth grade. Bottom ash samples were recovered from each of the units at Coleman Station. Characterization confirmed that sufficient quantity and quality of material is generated to produce a marketable lightweight aggregate and recover a high-grade fuel product. Spiral concentration provided acceptable grade lightweight aggregate with yields of only 10 to 20%. Incorporating a sieve bend into the process to recover coarse, porous ash particles from the outside race of the spirals increased aggregate yield to as high as 75%, however, the carbon content of the aggregate also increased. An opening size of 28 mesh on the sieve bend appeared to be sufficient. Lightweight concrete blocks (28 to 32 lbs) were produced from bottom ash and results show that acceptable strength could be attained with a cement/concrete ratio as low as 1/4. A mobile Proof-of-Concept (POC) field unit was designed and fabricated to meet the processing objectives of the project. The POC plant consisted of two trailer-mounted modules and was completely self sufficient with respect to power and water requirements. The POC unit was hauled to Coleman Station and operated at a feed rate of 2 tph. Results showed that the spirals operated similarly to previous pilot-scale operations and a 500 lb composite sample of coarse carbon was collected with a grade of 51.7% C or 7279 Btu/lb. Flotation results compared favorably with release analysis and 500 lbs of composite froth product was collected with a grade of 35% C or 4925 Btu/lb. The froth product was dewatered to 39% moisture with vacuum filtration. Pan pelletization and briquetting were evaluated as a means of minimizing handling concerns. Rotary pan pelletization produced uniform pellets with a compressive strength of 4 lbf without the use of any binder. Briquettes were produced by blending the coarse and fine carbon products at a ratio of 1:10, which is the proportion that the two products would be produced in a commercial operation. Using 3% lime as a binder produced the most desirable briquettes with respect to strength, attrition and drop testing. Additionally, the POC carbon products compared favorably with commercial activated carbon when used for removal of mercury from simulated flue gas. A business model was generated to summarize anti

J.G. Groppo; T.L. Robl

2005-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

246

Technology for the Recovery of Fuel and Adsorbent Carbons from Coal Burning Utility Ash Ponds and Landfills  

SciTech Connect

Several sampling techniques were evaluated to recover representative core samples from the ash ponds at Western Kentucky Energy's Coleman Station. The most successful was a combination of continuous-flight augers and specially designed soft-sediment sampling tubes driven by a Hammerhead drill mounted on an amphibious ARGO vehicle. A total of 51 core samples were recovered and analyzed in 3 ft sections and it was determined that there are 1,354,974 tons of ash in Pond C. Of the over 1.35M tons of ash present, 14% or 190K tons can be considered as coarse (+100 mesh). Pond C contains approximately 88K tons of carbon, nearly half of which is coarse and potentially recoverable with spiral concentration while the fine carbon (-100 mesh) is recoverable with froth flotation. There are 1.27M tons of carbon-free ash, 12% of which is coarse and potentially usable as block sand. Spiral concentration testing on bulk samples showed that product grade of 30 to 38% C (4200 to 5500 Btu/lb) was obtainable. When this product was cleaned again in an additional stage of spiral concentration, the product grade was improved to 7200 to 8200 Btu/lb with an accompanying 13 to 29% decrease in yield. Release analysis of hydraulically classified pond ash showed that froth flotation could provide froth products with as high a grade as 9000 Btu/lb with a yield of 5%. Increasing yield to 10% reduced froth grade to 7000 Btu/lb. Batch flotation provided froth grades as high as 6500 Btu/lb with yields of 7% with 1.5 lb/ton SPP and 1 lb/ton frother. Column flotation test results were similar to those achieved in batch flotation in terms of both grade and yield, however, carbon recoveries were lower (<70%). High airflow rate was required to achieve >50% carbon recovery and using wash water improved froth grade. Bottom ash samples were recovered from each of the units at Coleman Station. Characterization confirmed that sufficient quantity and quality of material is generated to produce a marketable lightweight aggregate and recover a high-grade fuel product. Spiral concentration provided acceptable grade lightweight aggregate with yields of only 10 to 20%. Incorporating a sieve bend into the process to recover coarse, porous ash particles from the outside race of the spirals increased aggregate yield to as high as 75%, however, the carbon content of the aggregate also increased. An opening size of 28 mesh on the sieve bend appeared to be sufficient. Lightweight concrete blocks (28 to 32 lbs) were produced from bottom ash and results show that acceptable strength could be attained with a cement/concrete ratio as low as 1/4. A mobile Proof-of-Concept (POC) field unit was designed and fabricated to meet the processing objectives of the project. The POC plant consisted of two trailer-mounted modules and was completely self sufficient with respect to power and water requirements. The POC unit was hauled to Coleman Station and operated at a feed rate of 2 tph. Results showed that the spirals operated similarly to previous pilot-scale operations and a 500 lb composite sample of coarse carbon was collected with a grade of 51.7% C or 7279 Btu/lb. Flotation results compared favorably with release analysis and 500 lbs of composite froth product was collected with a grade of 35% C or 4925 Btu/lb. The froth product was dewatered to 39% moisture with vacuum filtration. Pan pelletization and briquetting were evaluated as a means of minimizing handling concerns. Rotary pan pelletization produced uniform pellets with a compressive strength of 4 lbf without the use of any binder. Briquettes were produced by blending the coarse and fine carbon products at a ratio of 1:10, which is the proportion that the two products would be produced in a commercial operation. Using 3% lime as a binder produced the most desirable briquettes with respect to strength, attrition and drop testing. Additionally, the POC carbon products compared favorably with commercial activated carbon when used for removal of mercury from simulated flue gas. A business model was generated to summarize anti

J.G. Groppo; T.L. Robl

2005-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

247

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 1, 2012 May 1, 2012 CX-008288: Categorical Exclusion Determination Decommissioning of the Appliance Testing and Evaluation Center in Morgantown CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 1, 2012 CX-008287: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 1, 2012 CX-008286: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 1, 2012 CX-008285: Categorical Exclusion Determination E85 (Ethanol) Retail Fueling Infrastructure Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.22

248

Web Services for Recovery.gov  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

established and widely supported Web technologies such asof Information Report 2009-035 Web Services for Recovery.govof Recovery.gov as a user-friendly Web site and hence most

Wilde, Erik; Kansa, Eric C; Yee, Raymond

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2011 4, 2011 CX-005572: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Washington-Tribe-Cowlitz Indian Tribe CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/04/2011 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy April 4, 2011 CX-005569: Categorical Exclusion Determination Montgomery County American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Act 1 (County Retrofits - Madison Lakes Park Geothermal) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/04/2011 Location(s): Montgomery County, Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 4, 2011 CX-005562: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Michigan-City-Clinton, Charter Township of

250

Application of Reservoir Characterization and Advanced Technology to Improve Recovery and Economics in a Lower Quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate Reservoir  

SciTech Connect

The OXY-operated Class 2 Project at West Welch is designed to demonstrate how the use of advanced technology can improve the economics of miscible CO{sub 2} injection projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate reservoirs. The research and design phase (Budget Period 1) primarily involved advanced reservoir characterization. The current demonstration phase (Budget Period 2) is the implementation of the reservoir management plan for an optimum miscible CO{sub 2} flood design based on the reservoir characterization. Although Budget Period 1 for the Project officially ended 12/31/96, reservoir characterization and simulation work continued during the Budget Period 2. During the fifth and sixth annual reporting periods (8/3/98-8/2/00) covered by this report, work continued on interpretation of the cross well seismic data to create porosity and permeability profiles which were distributed into the reservoir geostatistically. The initial interwell seismic CO{sub 2} monitor survey was conducted, the acquired data processed and interpretation started. Only limited well work and facility construction was conducted in the project area. The CO{sub 2} injection initiated in October 1997 was continued, although the operator had to modify the operating plan in response to low injection rates, well performance and changes in CO{sub 2} supply. CO{sub 2} injection was focused in a smaller area to increase the reservoir processing rate. By the end of the reporting period three producers had shown sustained oil rate increases and ten wells had experienced gas (CO{sub 2}) breakthrough.

Rebecca Egg

2002-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

251

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2011 5, 2011 CX-004864: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 01/05/2011 Location(s): Newtown, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 4, 2011 CX-004863: Categorical Exclusion Determination Arkansas Energy Technology Loan Program - General Energy Solutions Anaerobic Digester Loan Request Date: 01/04/2011 Location(s): Clarksville, Arkansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 4, 2011 CX-004859: Categorical Exclusion Determination Multi-Family Housing Weatherization CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 01/04/2011 Location(s): Kansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

252

Industrial Heat Recovery - 1982  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Two years ago I summarized 20 years of experience on Industrial Heat Recovery for the Energy-source Technology Conference and Exhibition held in New Orleans, Louisiana. At the end of that paper I concluded with brief advice on 'How to specify heat recovery equipment.' The two years which have elapsed since then have convinced me that proper specification assures the most reliable equipment at the lowest price. The most economical specification describes the operating and site data but leaves the design details for the supplier. A true specialist will be able to provide you with the latest technology at the best possible price. This paper explores the impact of specifications on heat recovery equipment and its associated cost.

Csathy, D.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

ASSESSING AND FORECASTING, BY PLAY, NATURAL GAS ULTIMATE RECOVERY GROWTH AND QUANTIFYING THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENTS IN THE TEXAS GULF COAST BASIN AND EAST TEXAS  

SciTech Connect

A detailed natural gas ultimate recovery growth (URG) analysis of the Texas Gulf Coast Basin and East Texas has been undertaken. The key to such analysis was determined to be the disaggregation of the resource base to the play level. A play is defined as a conceptual geologic unit having one or more reservoirs that can be genetically related on the basis of depositional origin of the reservoir, structural or trap style, source rocks and hydrocarbon generation, migration mechanism, seals for entrapment, and type of hydrocarbon produced. Plays are the geologically homogeneous subdivision of the universe of petroleum pools within a basin. Therefore, individual plays have unique geological features that can be used as a conceptual model that incorporates geologic processes and depositional environments to explain the distribution of petroleum. Play disaggregation revealed important URG trends for the major natural gas fields in the Texas Gulf Coast Basin and East Texas. Although significant growth and future potential were observed for the major fields, important URG trends were masked by total, aggregated analysis based on a broad geological province. When disaggregated by plays, significant growth and future potential were displayed for plays that were associated with relatively recently discovered fields, deeper reservoir depths, high structural complexities due to fault compartmentalization, reservoirs designated as tight gas/low-permeability, and high initial reservoir pressures. Continued technology applications and advancements are crucial in achieving URG potential in these plays.

William L. Fisher; Eugene M. Kim

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Laboratory April 1, 2010 CX-001504: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ocean Wind Energy Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.1, A9, A11 Date: 04012010 Location(s): Chapel...

255

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(Waste Management Site) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10072011 Location(s): West Jordan, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology...

256

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Experiments CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 09292010 Location(s): Hawaii Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 29, 2010 CX-004156:...

257

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11182009 Location(s): Niskayuna, New York Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 17, 2009 CX-000312: Categorical...

258

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03032011 Location(s): Bozeman, Montana Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 3, 2011 CX-005350: Categorical...

259

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 09132011 Location(s): Stairtown, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 13, 2011 CX-006755:...

260

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reservoirs CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09102010 Location(s): Austin, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 10, 2010 CX-003885:...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11082010 Location(s): Laramie, Wyoming Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 8, 2010 CX-004408: Categorical...

262

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12112009 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 11, 2009 CX-002608: Categorical...

263

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12112009 Location(s): Campbell County, Wyoming Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 11, 2009 CX-000429: Categorical...

264

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06282011 Location(s): Port Fourchon, Louisiana Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 28, 2011 CX-006117: Categorical...

265

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04132011 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 12, 2011 CX-005607: Categorical...

266

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11182010 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 18, 2010 CX-004476: Categorical...

267

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Laboratory November 19, 2010 CX-004489: Categorical Exclusion Determination Thai Process for Heavy Oil CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11192010 Location(s): Laramie,...

268

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13, 2010 CX-000726: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Novel Integrated Oxy-Combustion Flue Gas Purification Technology: A Near-Zero Emissions Pathway CX(s) Applied: B3.6...

269

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Amine Absorbent CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, A14 Date: 08162010 Location(s): San Francisco, California Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory...

270

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Technology Laboratory May 10, 2010 CX-002358: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fischer-Tropsch Fuels Development CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05102010 Location(s): Grand...

271

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Laboratory April 11, 2011 CX-005602: Categorical Exclusion Determination Jet Drilling With Energized Fluids CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B3.7 Date: 04112011 Location(s):...

272

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Laboratory August 8, 2013 CX-010806: Categorical Exclusion Determination 12-Volt Start Stop Battery Development CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08082013 Location(s):...

273

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exclusion Determination United States-China Advanced Coal Technologies Consortium - University of Kentucky CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 02042011 Location(s):...

274

Recycling and Secondary Recovery  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

"Applying Ausmelt Technology to Recover Cu, Ni, and Co from Slags" .... " Enhancing Cobalt Recovery from Primary and Secondary Resources" .... " Modifying Alumina Red Mud to Support a Revegetation Cover" (Research .... " Recycling Used Automotive Oil Filters" (Research Summary), K.D. Peaslee, February 1994, pp.

275

Heat Recovery From Solid Waste  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

More opportunity exists today for the successful implementation of resource recovery projects than at any other period. However, that doesn't mean that energy/resource recovery exists for everyone. You must have a favorable match of all the critical areas of evaluation, including the cost of fuel, cost of solid waste disposal, plant energy requirements, available technology, etc.

Underwood, O. W.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

Reactivation of an Idle Lease to Increase Heavy Oil Recovery through Application of Conventional Steam Drive Technology in a Low Dip Slope and Reservoir in the Midway-Sunset Field, San Jaoquin Basin, California  

SciTech Connect

This project reactivates ARCO's idle Pru Fee lease in the Midway-Sunset field, California and conducts a continuous steamflood enhanced oil recovery demonstration aided by an integration of modern reservoir characterization and simulation methods. Cyclic steam was used to reestablish baseline production within the reservoir characterization phase of the project completed in December 1996. During the demonstration phase begun in January 1997, a continuous steamflood enhanced oil recovery is testing the incremental value of this method as an alternative to cyclic steaming. Other economically marginal Class III reservoirs having similar producibility problems will benefit from insight gained in this project. The objective of the project are: (1) to return the shut-in portion of the reservoir to optimal commercial production; (2) to accurately describe the reservoir and recovery process; and (3) to convey the details of this activity to the domestic petroleum industry, especially to other producers in California, through an aggressive technology transfer program.

Schamel, Steven

1999-07-08T23:59:59.000Z

277

Design and Analysis on Energy Recovery System of Aquatic Product Comprehensive Process Factory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

To reduce energy consumption and carbon emission, this paper designs energy recovery technology of aquatic products processing plant, including refrigeration heat recovery and ice-making cooling recovery. Three heat recovery plans are compared and analyzed, ... Keywords: aquatic products, sensible heat recovery, heat recovery efficiency, cooling recovery

Min Li; Zhan Li; Xiaoqiang Jiang; Zhongjin Zhang; Lijin Zheng

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

278

Supercritical Recovery Systems LLC | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Recovery Systems LLC Place Clayton, Missouri Zip 63105 Product Holder of various biofuel processing technologies. Deeveloping an ethanol plant in Lacassine, Louisiana....

279

Technologies  

Technologies Materials. Aggregate Spray for Air Particulate; Actuators Made From Nanoporous Materials; Ceramic Filters; Energy Absorbing Material; Diode Arrays for ...

280

Technologies  

Science & Technology. Weapons & Complex Integration. News Center. News Center. Around the Lab. Contacts. For Reporters. Livermore Lab Report. ...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Technologies  

Technologies Energy. Advanced Carbon Aerogels for Energy Applications; Distributed Automated Demand Response; Electrostatic Generator/Motor; Modular Electromechanical ...

282

Technologies  

Technologies Energy, Utilities, & Power Systems. Advanced Carbon Aerogels for Energy Applications; Distributed Automated Demand Response; Electrostatic Generator/Motor

283

Technologies  

Technologies Research Tools. Cell-Free Assembly of NanoLipoprotein Particles; Chemical Prism; Lawrence Livermore Microbial Detection Array (LLMDA) ...

284

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2011 5, 2011 CX-005250: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wisconsin Clean Transportation Program - City of Milwaukee Lincoln Avenue, Compressed Natural Gas Infrastructure CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/15/2011 Location(s): Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 15, 2011 CX-005249: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wisconsin Clean Transportation Program - City of Milwaukee Ruby Avenue Compressed Natural Gas Infrastructure CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02/15/2011 Location(s): Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 15, 2011 CX-005239: Categorical Exclusion Determination Alaska-Tribe-Interior Regional Housing Authority Kaltag Community

285

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2009 7, 2009 CX-000460: Categorical Exclusion Determination Thermal Integration of Carbon Dioxide Compression Processes with Coal-Fired Power Plants Equipped with Carbon Capture CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12/07/2009 Location(s): Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 7, 2009 CX-000459: Categorical Exclusion Determination Molecular Simulation of Dissolved Inorganic Carbons for Underground Brine Carbon Dioxide Sequestration CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/07/2009 Location(s): Pasadena, California Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 7, 2009 CX-000458: Categorical Exclusion Determination Investigation on Flame Characteristics and Burner Operability Issues of Oxy-Fuel Combustion

286

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2011 , 2011 CX-005345: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Jersey Compressed Natural Gas Refuse Trucks, Shuttle Buses and Infrastructure Project: Blue Diamond Disposal Compressed Natural Gas Station CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Mount Arlington, New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 1, 2011 CX-005344: Categorical Exclusion Determination State of Indiana Clean Cities Alternative Fuels Implementation - Compressed Natural Gas Project at Fair Oaks CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Fair Oaks, Indiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 1, 2011 CX-005343: Categorical Exclusion Determination Long Island Regional Energy Collaborative

287

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2009 1, 2009 CX-000421: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of the Triassic Newark Basin of New York and New Jersey for Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide CX(s) Applied: B3.1, A9 Date: 12/11/2009 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 11, 2009 CX-000420: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of the Triassic Newark Basin of New York and New Jersey for Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide CX(s) Applied: B3.1, A9 Date: 12/11/2009 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 11, 2009 CX-000419: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of the Triassic Newark Basin of New York and New Jersey for Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide

288

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2010 5, 2010 CX-001353: Categorical Exclusion Determination Space Geodesy and Geochemistry Applied to the Monitoring, Verification of Carbon Capture and Storage - Kimberlina CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 03/15/2010 Location(s): Kimberlina, California Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 15, 2010 CX-001362: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interest Creating Jobs Through Energy Efficiency Using Wisconsin's Focus on Energy - Courtland Township CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B5.1 Date: 03/15/2010 Location(s): Courtland, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 15, 2010 CX-001361: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interest Creating Jobs Through Energy Efficiency Using Wisconsin's Focus on

289

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13, 2011 13, 2011 CX-007475: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Carolina Fuel Monitoring Initiative CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/13/2011 Location(s): North Carolina Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 13, 2011 CX-007474: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Geomechanical Analysis of Gas Shale Fracturing and Its Containment CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/13/2011 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 12, 2011 CX-007476: Categorical Exclusion Determination CEDF - Renewable Energy Program CX(s) Applied: B5.18 Date: 12/12/2011 Location(s): Vermont Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007487: Categorical Exclusion Determination City of Las Vegas Electric Vehicle Program CX(s) Applied: B5.23

290

Geothermal: Sponsored by OSTI -- Recovery Act: Finite Volume...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

GEOTHERMAL TECHNOLOGIES LEGACY COLLECTION - Sponsored by OSTI -- Recovery Act: Finite Volume Based Computer Program for Ground Source Heat Pump Systems Geothermal Technologies...

291

Enhanced coalbed methane recovery  

SciTech Connect

The recovery of coalbed methane can be enhanced by injecting CO{sub 2} in the coal seam at supercritical conditions. Through an in situ adsorption/desorption process the displaced methane is produced and the adsorbed CO{sub 2} is permanently stored. This is called enhanced coalbed methane recovery (ECBM) and it is a technique under investigation as a possible approach to the geological storage of CO{sub 2} in a carbon dioxide capture and storage system. This work reviews the state of the art on fundamental and practical aspects of the technology and summarizes the results of ECBM field tests. These prove the feasibility of ECBM recovery and highlight substantial opportunities for interdisciplinary research at the interface between earth sciences and chemical engineering.

Mazzotti, M.; Pini, R.; Storti, G. [ETH, Zurich (Switzerland). Inst. of Process Engineering

2009-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

292

Technologies  

High Performance Computing (HPC) Technologies; Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) ...

293

Recovery Act Milestones | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A New Biofuels Technology Blooms in Iowa Faces of the Recovery Act: 1366 Technologies Home Energy Assessments The Kill-a-Watt Competition at University of Central Florida Faces of...

294

Available Technologies: Island Vane Macroparticle Filter for ...  

Energy Efficiency; Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies. Monitoring and Imaging; Remediation; Modeling; Imaging ...

295

Available Technologies: High Frequency Abacus Nanotube Resonator  

Energy Efficiency; Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies. Monitoring and Imaging; Remediation; Modeling; Imaging ...

296

Available Technologies: Boron Nitride Converted Carbon Fibers  

Energy Efficiency; Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies. Monitoring and Imaging; Remediation; Modeling; Imaging ...

297

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery and improved drilling technology. Progress review No. 21, quarter ending December 31, 1979  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Individual report are presented of contracts for field projects and supporting research on chemical flooding, CO/sub 2/ injection, thermal/heavy oil, resource assessment technology, improved drilling technology, residual oil, environment, and petroleum technology. (DLC)

Linville, B. (ed.)

1980-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

Heavy crude oil recovery  

SciTech Connect

The oil crisis of the past decade has focused most of the attention and effort of researchers on crude oil resources, which are accepted as unrecoverable using known technology. World reserves are estimated to be 600-1000 billion metric tons, and with present technology 160 billion tons of this total can be recovered. This book is devoted to the discussion of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques, their mechanism and applicability to heavy oil reservoirs. The book also discusses some field results. The use of numerical simulators has become important, in addition to laboratory research, in analysing the applicability of oil recovery processes, and for this reason the last section of the book is devoted to simulators used in EOR research.

Okandan, E.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Recovery Act  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Recovery Act Buy American Requirements for Information Needed from Financial Assistance Applicants/Recipients for Waiver Requests Based on Unreasonable Cost or Nonavailability Applicants for and recipients of financial assistance funded by the Recovery Act must comply with the requirement that all of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work be produced in the United States, unless the head of the agency makes a waiver, or determination of inapplicability of the Buy American Recovery Act provisions, based on one of the authorized exceptions. The authorized exceptions are unreasonable cost, nonavailability, and in furtherance of the public interest. This

300

Distributed Generation Heat Recovery  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Economic and environmental drivers are promoting the adoption of combined heat and power (CHP) systems. Technology advances have produced new and improved distributed generation (DG) units that can be coupled with heat recovery hardware to create CHP systems. Performance characteristics vary considerably among DG options, and it is important to understand how these characteristics influence the selection of CHP systems that will meet both electric and thermal site loads.

2002-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Technolog  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Research in Research in Science and Technolog y Sandia pushes frontiers of knowledge to meet the nation's needs, today and tomorrow Sandia National Laboratories' fundamental science and technology research leads to greater understanding of how and why things work and is intrinsic to technological advances. Basic research that challenges scientific assumptions enables the nation to push scientific boundaries. Innovations and breakthroughs produced at Sandia allow it to tackle critical issues, from maintaining the safety, security and effectiveness of the nation's nuclear weapons and preventing domestic and interna- tional terrorism to finding innovative clean energy solutions, develop- ing cutting-edge nanotechnology and moving the latest advances to the marketplace. Sandia's expertise includes:

302

Technology  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Technology Computers and the internet play an increasingly larger role in the lives of students. In this activity, students must use various web sites to locate specific pieces of...

303

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2009 2, 2009 CX-000062: Categorical Exclusion Determination Greenville's SMART Building Program CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1, B2.2 Date: 11/12/2009 Location(s): Greenville, Mississippi Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy November 12, 2009 CX-000379: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sweeney Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle/Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project - Carbon Dioxide Pipeline and Storage CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.1 Date: 11/12/2009 Location(s): Sweeney, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 12, 2009 CX-000378: Categorical Exclusion Determination Monitoring, Verification, and Analysis Feasibility Study (for Demonstration of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from Steam Methane Reforming Process Gas Used for Large-Scale Hydrogen Production)

304

Outlook for enhanced oil recovery  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper reviews the potential for enhanced oil recovery, the evolutionary nature of the recovery processes being applied in oilfields today, key parameters that describe the technology state-of-the-art for each of the major oil recovery processes, and the nature and key outputs from the current Department of Energy research program on enhanced oil recovery. From this overview, it will be seen that the DOE program is focused on the analysis of ongoing tests and on long-range, basic research to support a more thorough understanding of process performance. Data from the program will be made available through reports, symposia, and on-line computer access; the outputs are designed to allow an independent producer to evaluate his own project as an effort to transfer rapidly the technology now being developed.

Johnson, H.R.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

Recovery Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26, 2010 26, 2010 200,000 Homes Weatherized Under the Recovery Act -- Video from Cathy Zoi Vice President Biden announced that 200,000 homes have been Weatherized under the Recovery Act. Hear what Cathy Zoi, Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, has to say on Weatherization. August 26, 2010 200,000 homes weatherized under the Recovery Act August 25, 2010 The Recovery Act: Cutting Costs and Upping Capacity Secretary Chu joined Vice President Joe Biden at the White House to help unveil a new report on how investments made through the Recovery Act have been impacting innovation. While the report analyzed several major sectors, its most striking findings centered on energy. August 25, 2010 Eco Technologies, Inc., hired eleven workers to install these solar panels at the Hillsborough County judicial center. | Photo courtesy of Hillsborough County

306

Recovery Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recovery Act Recovery Act Recovery Act The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 -- commonly called the "stimulus" -- was designed to spur economic growth while creating new jobs and saving existing ones. Through the Recovery Act, the Energy Department invested more than $31 billion to support a wide range of clean energy projects across the nation -- from investing in the smart grid and developing alternative fuel vehicles to helping homeowners and businesses reduce their energy costs with energy efficiency upgrades and deploying carbon capture and storage technologies. The Department's programs helped create new power sources, conserve resources and aligned the nation to lead the global energy economy. Featured Leaders of the Fuel Cell Pack Fuel cell forklifts like the one shown here are used by leading companies across the U.S. as part of their daily business operations. | Energy Department file photo.

307

Report on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Recovery Act Projects Now Available Report on Synchrophasor Technologies and Their Deployment in Recovery Act Projects...

308

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 13, 2010 January 13, 2010 CX-000726: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Novel Integrated Oxy-Combustion Flue Gas Purification Technology: A Near-Zero Emissions Pathway CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/13/2010 Location(s): Birmingham, Alabama Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 13, 2010 CX-000727: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Novel Integrated Oxy-Combustion Flue Gas Purification Technology: A Near-Zero Emissions Pathway CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 01/13/2010 Location(s): Bridgewater, New Jersey Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 13, 2010 CX-000728: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Novel Integrated Oxy-Combustion Flue Gas Purification Technology: A Near-Zero Emissions Pathway CX(s) Applied: A9

309

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 9, 2011 September 9, 2011 CX-006745: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Coal Conference CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/09/2011 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 8, 2011 CX-006742: Categorical Exclusion Determination National Energy Technology Laboratory Pittsburgh - Replace 25 Kilovolt Air Switch 920 Area CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/08/2011 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 8, 2011 CX-006741: Categorical Exclusion Determination Information Technology Hub Relocation CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 09/08/2011 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 8, 2011

310

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2010 3, 2010 CX-003766: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of High Rate Coating Technology for Low Cost Electrochemical Dynamic Windows CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/03/2010 Location(s): Berkeley, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 3, 2010 CX-003761: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ramgen Supersonic Shock Wave Compression and Engine Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/03/2010 Location(s): Redmond, Washington Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 3, 2010 CX-003759: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geological Sequestration Fundamental Research Lab Move CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/03/2010 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

311

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery: Progress review No. 52 quarter ending September 30, 1987  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This progress review on enhanced oil recovery covers: Chemical Flooding /emdash/ Supporting Research; Gas Displacement /emdash/ Supporting Research; Thermal Recovery /emdash/ Supporting Research; Resource Assessment Technology; Geoscience Technology; Environmental Technology; Microbial Technology.

Not Available

1988-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

Chemically enhanced oil recovery  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Yet when conducted according to present state of the art, chemical flooding (i.e., micellar/polymer flooding, surfactant/polymer flooding, surfactant flooding) can mobilize more residual crude oil than any other method of enhanced oil recovery. It also is one of the most expensive methods of enhanced oil recovery. This contribution will describe some of the technology that comprises the state of the art technology that must be adhered to if a chemical flood is to be successful. Although some of the efforts to reduce cost and other points are discussed, the principle focus is on technical considerations in designing a good chemical flooding system. The term chemical flooding is restricted here to methods of enhanced oil recovery that employs a surfactant, either injected into the oil reservoir or generated in situ, primarily to reduce oil-water interfacial tension. Hence, polymer-water floods for mobility or profile control, steam foams, and carbon dioxide foams are excluded. Some polymer considerations are mentioned because they apply to providing mobility control for chemical flooding systems.

Nelson, R.C.

1989-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

Recovery, reuse, and recycle of industrial waste  

SciTech Connect

The major goal of this work is to produce a document useful in planning efforts aimed at elimination of industrial wastes through the application of recycle, recovery, and reuse technology. The pollutants considered in this study are basically organic and inorganic by-products from wastewater effluents, solid residue and gaseous emissions from industrial operations. The first section contains chapters on methodology currently available for recovery of industrial and hazardous waste, and developing technology for recycle, reuse and recovery. The second section contains chapters on 5 technical categories, used for recovery namely, sorption, molecular separation, phase transition, chemical modification, and physical dispersion and separation.

Noll, K.E.; Haas, C.N.; Schmidt, C.; Kodukula, P.

1983-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

314

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2009 financial assistance 4, 2009 financial assistance Special provisions relating to work funded under American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Mar 2009) [Prescription: This clause must be included in all grants, cooperative agreements and TIAs (new or amended) when funds appropriated under the Recovery Act are obligated to the agreement.] Preamble The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. 111-5, (Recovery Act) was enacted to preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery, assist those most impacted by the recession, provide investments needed to increase economic efficiency by spurring technological advances in science and health, invest in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure that will provide long-

315

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2009 9, 2009 CX-000548: Categorical Exclusion Determination Disposition of Water from the 105-C Disassembly Basin CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 11/19/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office November 19, 2009 CX-000317: Categorical Exclusion Determination Massachusetts Revision 1 - Massachusetts Solar Stimulus CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.7, B1.15, B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 11/19/2009 Location(s): Massachusetts Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 19, 2009 CX-000316: Categorical Exclusion Determination Massachusetts Revision 1 - High Performance Buildings Program CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.22, B1.23, B1.31, B2.1, B2.3, B2.5, A1, A9, A11,

316

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2009 3, 2009 CX-000331: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kentucky Revision 2 - Commercial Office Building Retrofit Showcase CX(s) Applied: B1.4, B1.5, B1.15, B1.23, B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 12/03/2009 Location(s): Lexington, Kentucky Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 3, 2009 CX-000234: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nevada City Reno CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B5.1 Date: 12/03/2009 Location(s): Reno, Nevada Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office December 3, 2009 CX-000233: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Jersey City Jersey City CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B5.1 Date: 12/03/2009 Location(s): Jersey City, New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

317

Field Performance of Heat Recovery Chillers and Heat Recovery Heat Pumps  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Heat recovery chillers and heat recovery heat pumps operate at high efficiency and excellent economy by simultaneously providing both heating and cooling. Although this technology has been in use for more than thirty years and all major chiller manufacturers offer heat recovery models, applications are not yet widespread. One of the barriers to using this technology is the lack of measured performance information on the devices. This project was undertaken to identify and summarize existing sources of pe...

1994-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

318

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2010 2, 2010 CX-002250: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Central Texas Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Investments CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/12/2010 Location(s): Southlake, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 12, 2010 CX-002249: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Central Texas Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Investments CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/12/2010 Location(s): Southlake, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 12, 2010 CX-002248: Categorical Exclusion Determination Competitive Renewable Grants Program - Claflin University Solar Thermal CX(s) Applied: A1, B1.5, B5.1 Date: 05/12/2010 Location(s): Orangeburg, South Carolina

319

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

24, 2011 24, 2011 CX-005319: Categorical Exclusion Determination Alternative Fuel/Advanced Vehicle Technology - City of Raleigh CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/24/2011 Location(s): Raleigh, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 24, 2011 CX-005318: Categorical Exclusion Determination Alternative Fuel/Advanced Vehicle Technology - North Carolina State University CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/24/2011 Location(s): North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 24, 2011 CX-005317: Categorical Exclusion Determination University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), District Energy Service Modifications CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/24/2011

320

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 14, 2013 August 14, 2013 CX-010787: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fire Loop Soil Excavation CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B6.1 Date: 08/14/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 14, 2013 CX-010786: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Central Texas Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Investments CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 08/14/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 14, 2013 CX-010791: Categorical Exclusion Determination Gulf of Mexico Miocene Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Site Characterization Mega Transect CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/14/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 14, 2013 CX-010792: Categorical Exclusion Determination Gulf of Mexico Miocene Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Site Characterization Mega

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2012 7, 2012 CX-009374: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of a Carbon Dioxide Chemical Sensor for Downhole Carbon Dioxide Monitoring in Carbon Sequestration CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/17/2012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 17, 2012 CX-009373: Categorical Exclusion Determination Testing of an Advanced Dry Cooling Technology for Power Plants CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/17/2012 Location(s): North Dakota Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 17, 2012 CX-009372: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small Scale Coal-Biomass to Liquids Using Highly Selective Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/17/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

322

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 2012 20, 2012 CX-008446: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Operating on Alternative and Renewable Fuels CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 20, 2012 CX-008445: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Operating on Alternative and Renewable Fuels CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 19, 2012 CX-008450: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building 93 Heat Exchanger Removal at National Energy Technology Laboratory Pittsburgh CX(s) Applied: B1.23, B1.31 Date: 06/19/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 19, 2012 CX-008449: Categorical Exclusion Determination

323

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 27, 2012 April 27, 2012 CX-008292: Categorical Exclusion Determination Waste Heat Integration with Solvent Process for More Efficient Carbon Dioxide Removal from Coal-Fired Flue Gas CX(s) Applied: A11 Date: 04/27/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory April 25, 2012 CX-008309: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evaluation of Solid Sorbents as a Retrofit Technology for Carbon Dioxide Capture CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/25/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory April 25, 2012 CX-008307: Categorical Exclusion Determination Deepwater Reverse-Circulation Primary Cementing CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/25/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory April 25, 2012 CX-008306: Categorical Exclusion Determination

324

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 5, 2011 December 5, 2011 CX-007500: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Absorber Retrofit Equipment (CARE) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2011 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory October 19, 2011 CX-007063: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 10/19/2011 Location(s): Windsor, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 18, 2011 CX-007065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Slipstream Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Novel Amine-Based Post-Combustion Technology for Carbon Dioxide Capture CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/18/2011 Location(s): Wilsonville, Alabama Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

325

Recovery Newsletters  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

newsletters Office of Environmental newsletters Office of Environmental Management 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 202-586-7709 en 2011 ARRA Newsletters http://energy.gov/em/downloads/2011-arra-newsletters 2011 ARRA Newsletters

326

Supporting technology for enhanced recovery, Annex V: evaluate application of recently developed techniques in the areas of drilling, coring, and telemetry. Venezuela-MEM/USA-DOE fossil-energy report V-1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Agreement between the United States and Venezuela was designed to further energy research and development in six areas. This report focuses on Annex V - Drilling, Coring, and Telemetry as supporting technology for enhanced oil recovery projects in the United States and Venezuela. Annex V consists of 18 tasks to perform these three projects. This report completes the work for Annex V. Energy research and development in the area of Enhanced Oil Recovery has as its goal the more efficient and complete production of the third crop of oil. Methods and techniques must be developed to assist in the implementation of EOR projects. Technology development that reduces costs and provides better reservoir information often has a direct impact on the economic viability of EOR projects and Annex V addresses these areas. Each of the three areas covered by Annex V are separate entities and are presented in this report as different sections. Each has its own Abstract. The drilling and coring tests were highly successful but only a limited amount of work was necessary in the Telemetry area because a field test was not feasible.

Williams, C.R.; Lichaa, P.; Van Domselaar, H.

1983-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

327

RMOTC - Testing - Enhanced Oil Recovery  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Enhanced Oil Recovery Enhanced Oil Recovery Notice: As of July 15th 2013, the Department of Energy announced the intent to sell Naval Petroleum Reserve Number 3 (NPR3). The sale of NPR-3 will also include the sale of all equipment and materials onsite. A decision has been made by the Department of Energy to complete testing at RMOTC by July 1st, 2014. RMOTC will complete testing in the coming year with the currently scheduled testing partners. For more information on the sale of NPR-3 and sale of RMOTC equipment and materials please join our mailing list here. RMOTC will play a significant role in continued enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology development and field demonstration. A scoping engineering study on Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3's (NPR-3) enhanced oil recovery

328

Carbon Dioxide Reduction Technologies  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Technologies developed to sequester CO2 or use CO2 for enhanced fossil fuel recovery are currently in operation. Taxation regimes and CO2 credit trading are

329

Drain Water Heat Recovery | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Drain Water Heat Recovery Drain Water Heat Recovery Drain Water Heat Recovery June 15, 2012 - 6:20pm Addthis Diagram of a drain water heat recovery system. Diagram of a drain water heat recovery system. How does it work? Use heat from water you've already used to preheat more hot water, reducing your water heating costs. Any hot water that goes down the drain carries away energy with it. That's typically 80%-90% of the energy used to heat water in a home. Drain-water (or greywater) heat recovery systems capture this energy from water you've already used (for example, to shower, wash dishes, or wash clothing) to preheat cold water entering the water heater or going to other water fixtures. This reduces the amount of energy needed for water heating. How It Works Drain-water heat recovery technology works well with all types of water

330

Drain Water Heat Recovery | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Drain Water Heat Recovery Drain Water Heat Recovery Drain Water Heat Recovery June 15, 2012 - 6:20pm Addthis Diagram of a drain water heat recovery system. Diagram of a drain water heat recovery system. How does it work? Use heat from water you've already used to preheat more hot water, reducing your water heating costs. Any hot water that goes down the drain carries away energy with it. That's typically 80%-90% of the energy used to heat water in a home. Drain-water (or greywater) heat recovery systems capture this energy from water you've already used (for example, to shower, wash dishes, or wash clothing) to preheat cold water entering the water heater or going to other water fixtures. This reduces the amount of energy needed for water heating. How It Works Drain-water heat recovery technology works well with all types of water

331

Recovery, recycle and reuse of industrial wastes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This book discusses the elimination of industrial wastes through the application of recycle, recovery and reuse technology. An overview is provided of how various processes can recover potential contaminants for eventual reuse. Chapters include resource recovery from hazardous waste, sorption, molecular separation, phase transition, chemical modifications, physical dispersion and separation.

Noll, K.E.; Haas, C.N.; Schmidt, C.; Kodukula, P.

1985-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2009 7, 2009 CX-000411: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fiber Containing Sweep Fluids for Ultra Deepwater Drilling Applications CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.6 Date: 12/17/2009 Location(s): Norman, Oklahoma Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 17, 2009 CX-000410: Categorical Exclusion Determination Deepwater Riserless Intervention System CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 12/17/2009 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 16, 2009 CX-000375: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hydrogen Separation for Clean Coal CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/16/2009 Location(s): Laramie, Wyoming Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 15, 2009 CX-000464: Categorical Exclusion Determination

333

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 17, 2013 May 17, 2013 CX-010279: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clemson University's Synchrophasor Education Engineering Program CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/17/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 17, 2013 CX-010278: Categorical Exclusion Determination Collaborative Industry-Academic Synchrophasor Engineering Program CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/17/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 14, 2013 CX-010282: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low Temperature Nitrous Oxide Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 14, 2013 CX-010281: Categorical Exclusion Determination

334

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2012 0, 2012 CX-009271: Categorical Exclusion Determination National Governors Association Energy Project - Phase II CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09/10/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 10, 2012 CX-009270: Categorical Exclusion Determination Basin-Scale Produced Water Management Tools and Options CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/10/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 7, 2012 CX-009290: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interagency Study on the Implementation of Integrated Computational Materials Engineering... CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09/07/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 7, 2012 CX-009289: Categorical Exclusion Determination

335

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 28, 2010 June 28, 2010 CX-002841: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program (Summary Categorical Exclusion) CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 06/28/2010 Location(s): Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 25, 2010 CX-002795: Categorical Exclusion Determination Market Transformation and Technology Deployment - Renewable Energy Projects CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/25/2010 Location(s): Perkinston, Mississippi Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 25, 2010 CX-002794: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Implementation of A123's Community Energy Storage (CES) System for Grid Support CX(s) Applied: B4.6, B5.1 Date: 06/25/2010 Location(s): Detroit, Michigan

336

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25, 2012 25, 2012 CX-008305: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 04/25/2012 Location(s): North Carolina Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory April 25, 2012 CX-008304: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of Retail Biofuel Infrastructure Supporting I-75 Green Corridor Project CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.22 Date: 04/25/2012 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory April 25, 2012 CX-008303: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interstate Electrification Improvement CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B5.23 Date: 04/25/2012 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory April 25, 2012 CX-008302: Categorical Exclusion Determination Interstate Electrification Improvement

337

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18, 2011 18, 2011 CX-005626: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Carolina Green Business Fund ? Kyma Technologies CX(s) Applied: A1, B1.4, B1.5, B5.1 Date: 04/18/2011 Location(s): North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 18, 2011 CX-005625: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grants for State-Sponsored Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects - New Jersey Transit Solar CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/18/2011 Location(s): Kearny, New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 15, 2011 CX-005629: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Carolina Green Business Fund ? Storms Farms CX(s) Applied: A1, B1.15, B4.11, B5.1 Date: 04/15/2011

338

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2010 8, 2010 CX-002514: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program - Clean Energy Property Rebate Program CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 05/28/2010 Location(s): Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 28, 2010 CX-002513: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohio Advanced Transportation Partnership CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/28/2010 Location(s): Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 28, 2010 CX-002511: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rhode Island Green Public Buildings Initiative CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 05/28/2010 Location(s): Rhode Island Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 28, 2010

339

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29, 2011 29, 2011 CX-005666: Categorical Exclusion Determination DeKalb County/Metropolitan Atlanta Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Vehicle Project CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 04/29/2011 Location(s): Marrow, Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 29, 2011 CX-005664: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development and Testing of Compact Heat Exchange Reactors (CHER) for Synthesis of Liquid Fuels CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/29/2011 Location(s): Laramie, Wyoming Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 29, 2011 CX-005663: Categorical Exclusion Determination Vortex Tube Project Decommissioning Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/29/2011 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia

340

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 3, 2013 June 3, 2013 CX-010470: Categorical Exclusion Determination Boulder Smart Grid City - Plug-In Electric Hybrid CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B5.16 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 3, 2013 CX-010468: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evaluation of High Capacity Cells for Electric Vehicle Applications CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 3, 2013 CX-010467: Categorical Exclusion Determination Metal Oxide/Nitride Heterostructured Nanowire Arrays for Ultra-Sensitive and Selective Sensors CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): Connecticut Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 31, 2013 CX-010478: Categorical Exclusion Determination

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2012 7, 2012 CX-008473: Categorical Exclusion Determination Effect of Climate Variability & Change in Hurricane Activity in the North Atlantic CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/07/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 7, 2012 CX-008472: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 06/07/2012 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 4, 2012 CX-008482: Categorical Exclusion Determination Composite Riser for Ultra-Deepwater High Pressure Wells CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 06/04/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 4, 2012 CX-008480: Categorical Exclusion Determination Composite Riser for Ultra-Deepwater High Pressure Wells

342

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

April 25, 2013 April 25, 2013 CX-010181: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building 26 Air Handlers and In-Line Return Fans Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.22, B.1.31 Date: 04/25/2013 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory April 25, 2013 CX-010180: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Universal Combustion Model to Predict Premixed and Non-Premixed Turbulent Flames in Compression CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04/25/2013 Location(s): Other Location Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory April 25, 2013 CX-010179: Categorical Exclusion Determination Modeling and Experimental Studies of Controllable Cavity Turbulent Jet Ignition CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/25/2013 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

343

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 10, 2012 January 10, 2012 CX-007615: Categorical Exclusion Determination Henderson Family Young Mens Christian Association CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B5.2 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): North Carolina Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory January 10, 2012 CX-007614: Categorical Exclusion Determination Next Generation Ultra Lean Burn Powertrain CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory January 10, 2012 CX-007613: Categorical Exclusion Determination Next Generation Ultra Lean Burn Powertrain CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory January 10, 2012 CX-007612: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geological Characterization of the South Georgia Rift Basin for Source

344

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11, 2011 11, 2011 CX-005223: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/11/2011 Location(s): Raleigh, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 11, 2011 CX-005222: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 02/11/2011 Location(s): Youngsville, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 11, 2011 CX-005229: Categorical Exclusion Determination Field Testing and Diagnostics of Radial-Jet Well-Stimulation for Enhanced Oil Reserve from Marginal Reserves CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/11/2011 Location(s): Socorro, New Mexico Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

345

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2010 8, 2010 CX-004409: Categorical Exclusion Determination Petroleum Processing Efficiency Improvement CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/08/2010 Location(s): Laramie, Wyoming Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 8, 2010 CX-004408: Categorical Exclusion Determination ArmorBelt Single Point Gas Lift System for Stripper Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 11/08/2010 Location(s): Haskell County, Oklahoma Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 8, 2010 CX-004407: Categorical Exclusion Determination ArmorBelt Single Point Gas Lift System for Stripper Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 11/08/2010 Location(s): Pittsburg County, Oklahoma Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 8, 2010 CX-004406: Categorical Exclusion Determination

346

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2011 7, 2011 CX-006051: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 06/07/2011 Location(s): Omaha, Nebraska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 6, 2011 CX-006055: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation and Abandonment of Monitoring Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B6.1 Date: 06/06/2011 Location(s): Albany, Oregon Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 4, 2011 CX-005949: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of Most Promising Sequestration Formations in the Rocky Mountain Region- TerraTek CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/04/2011 Location(s): Salt Lake City, Utah Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

347

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2013 , 2013 CX-010816: Categorical Exclusion Determination Effects of Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) on Turbulent Combustion and Emissions in Advanced Gas... CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 1, 2013 CX-010815: Categorical Exclusion Determination Effects of Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) on Turbulent Combustion and Emissions in Advanced Gas... CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): Indiana Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory July 30, 2013 CX-010826: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evaluation of Flow and Heat Transfer Inside Lean Pre-Mixed Combustor Systems under Reacting Flow Conditions CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/30/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

348

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 2011 20, 2011 CX-007453: Categorical Exclusion Determination Paving the Way with Propane: The AutoGas Corridor Development Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/20/2011 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 20, 2011 CX-007452: Categorical Exclusion Determination Utah Expansion of Alternative Fueling Infrastructure - Electric Charging Stations CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/20/2011 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 20, 2011 CX-007451: Categorical Exclusion Determination Commuter Services Compressed Natural Gas Station CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B5.22 Date: 12/20/2011 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 20, 2011 CX-007450: Categorical Exclusion Determination

349

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2011 , 2011 CX-005342: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of Impalement Protection Over Existing Pointed Air Terminals at National Energy Technology Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 1, 2011 CX-005341: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance Coal-Based Systems - FuelCell Energy CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Alberta, Canada Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 1, 2011 CX-005340: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 03/01/2011 Location(s): Greene, Missouri Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

350

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

27, 2010 27, 2010 CX-002519: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 05/27/2010 Location(s): Dallas, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 27, 2010 CX-002518: Categorical Exclusion Determination Gadsden State Community College Green Operations Plan CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/27/2010 Location(s): Gadsen, Alabama Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 27, 2010 CX-002517: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Propane Fleet Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 05/27/2010 Location(s): Dallas, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 27, 2010

351

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2013 30, 2013 CX-010824: Categorical Exclusion Determination Manufacturing Process for Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) Integrated Substrate CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/30/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory July 30, 2013 CX-010823: Categorical Exclusion Determination Manufacturing Process for Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) Integrated Substrate CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/30/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory July 30, 2013 CX-010822: Categorical Exclusion Determination Manufacturing Process for Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) Integrated Substrate CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/30/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory July 30, 2013 CX-010821: Categorical Exclusion Determination

352

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25, 2012 25, 2012 CX-008442: Categorical Exclusion Determination Arizona Power Partners - Smart Grid Data Access from an Advanced Meter Reading Network CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Arizona Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 21, 2012 CX-008448: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hurricane Natural Gas Fueling Station CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B5.22 Date: 06/21/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 21, 2012 CX-008447: Categorical Exclusion Determination The Shift for Good Community Program (Switch 4 Good) CX(s) Applied: A1, A8, A9, A11 Date: 06/21/2012 Location(s): Multiple Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 21, 2012 CX-008444: Categorical Exclusion Determination Smart Cementing Materials and Drilling Muds for Real Time Monitoring of

353

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26, 2013 26, 2013 CX-010900: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pittsburgh Building 84 Gas Line Project CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 06/26/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 26, 2013 CX-010898: Categorical Exclusion Determination Minnesota ethanol-85 (E85) Fueling Network Expansion Project CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 06/26/2013 Location(s): Minnesota Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 25, 2013 CX-010906: Categorical Exclusion Determination Research and Development (R&D) to Prepare and Characterize Coal/Biomass Mixtures for Direct Co-Feeding into Gasification Systems CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/25/2013 Location(s): Alabama Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 20, 2013 CX-010441: Categorical Exclusion Determination

354

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2012 0, 2012 CX-009354: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Resolution 3D Laser Imaging for Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Operations - Phase II CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 09/20/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 20, 2012 CX-009353: Categorical Exclusion Determination The Sustainability Workshop (Energy Regional Innovation Cluster) CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/20/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 20, 2012 CX-009352: Categorical Exclusion Determination Navy Yard Network Operations Center (Energy Regional Innovation Cluster) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.2 Date: 09/20/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 19, 2012

355

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2010 5, 2010 CX-004434: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/05/2010 Location(s): Stonington, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 5, 2010 CX-004400: Categorical Exclusion Determination Repair Brick Support Plates on Connecting Bridges - Building 58 CX(s) Applied: B2.3 Date: 11/05/2010 Location(s): Allegheny City, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 5, 2010 CX-004399: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mississippi Energy Efficiency Appliance Rebate Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/05/2010 Location(s): Mississippi Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

356

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23, 2010 23, 2010 CX-003463: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Dioxide Capture by Sub-Ambient Membrane Operation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 08/23/2010 Location(s): Newark, Delaware Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 23, 2010 CX-003462: Categorical Exclusion Determination Visitor's Center Conference Room CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.15 Date: 08/23/2010 Location(s): Morgantown,West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 23, 2010 CX-003461: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low-Cost Wet Gas Compressor for Stripper Gas Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/23/2010 Location(s): Cambridge, Massachusetts Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 23, 2010 CX-003460: Categorical Exclusion Determination

357

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2012 0, 2012 CX-009310: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of Reservoir Storage Capacity in Different Depositional Environments (Rock Sampling) CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 08/30/2012 Location(s): Multiple Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 30, 2012 CX-009309: Categorical Exclusion Determination Unraveling the Role of Transport, Electrocatalysis, and Surface Science in the SOFC Cathode ORR CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/30/2012 Location(s): Multiple Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 29, 2012 CX-008916: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of a Scientific Plan for a Hydrate-Focused Marine Drilling, Logging and Coring Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 08/29/2012 Location(s): Washington, DC Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

358

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2012 30, 2012 CX-009314: Categorical Exclusion Determination Roof Replacement and Fall Arrest System Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B2.5 Date: 08/30/2012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 30, 2012 CX-009313: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Methane Hydrate Reservoir Modeling Using Rock Physics Techniques CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 08/30/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 30, 2012 CX-009312: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pecan Street Smart Grid Extension Service CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/30/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 30, 2012 CX-009311: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of Reservoir Storage Capacity in Different Depositional

359

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-003837: Categorical Exclusion Determination Simulation of Shale Gas Reservoirs Incorporating the Correct Physics for Capillarity CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/09/2010 Location(s): Norman, Oklahoma Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 9, 2010 CX-003836: Categorical Exclusion Determination Large Project Impact Fund Competitive Grants - Colby College CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.24, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 09/09/2010 Location(s): Waterville, Maine Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 9, 2010 CX-003835: Categorical Exclusion Determination SmartRam Piston Pump CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/09/2010 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

360

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 10, 2013 May 10, 2013 CX-010285: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advancing Low Temperature Combustion and Lean Burning Engines for Light-and Heavy-Duty Vehicles CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 05/10/2013 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 10, 2013 CX-010284: Categorical Exclusion Determination Construction of an Autogas Refueling Network CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 05/10/2013 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 8, 2013 CX-010287: Categorical Exclusion Determination Understanding Nitrous Oxide Selective Catalytic Reduction Mechanism and Activity on Copper/Chabazite Structures throughout the Catalyst Life CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 05/08/2013 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 14, 2013 August 14, 2013 CX-010791: Categorical Exclusion Determination Gulf of Mexico Miocene Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Site Characterization Mega Transect CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/14/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 13, 2013 CX-010799: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building 4 Lead Paint Abatement & Repainting CX(s) Applied: B2.1, B2.5 Date: 08/13/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 13, 2013 CX-010800: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hybrid Membrane/Absorption Process for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 08/13/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 12, 2013 CX-010802: Categorical Exclusion Determination

362

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2010 3, 2010 CX-002242: Categorical Exclusion Determination Micro-X-Ray Diffraction Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/13/2010 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 13, 2010 CX-002241: Categorical Exclusion Determination Maximizing Alternative Fuel Use and Distribution in Colorado CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/13/2010 Location(s): Aurora, Colorado Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 13, 2010 CX-002240: Categorical Exclusion Determination Heavy Oil Viscous Pressure-Volume Temperature (PVT) - Houston CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/13/2010 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 13, 2010 CX-002238: Categorical Exclusion Determination

363

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2012 6, 2012 CX-007948: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Start - Development of a National Liquid Propane Refueling Network CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 02/06/2012 Location(s): California, Arizona Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory February 1, 2012 CX-007952: Categorical Exclusion Determination Esperanza Roof Replacement CX(s) Applied: A1, B2.1, B5.1 Date: 02/01/2012 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory February 1, 2012 CX-007951: Categorical Exclusion Determination Puget Sound Clean Cities Petroleum Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 02/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory February 1, 2012 CX-007950: Categorical Exclusion Determination Environmental Protection Agency - 5th International Environmentally

364

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 2013 21, 2013 CX-010780: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Analytical Methods for Air and Stray Gas Emissions and Produced Brine Characterization CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 08/21/2013 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 21, 2013 CX-010782: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Geomechanical Model for Gas Shales Based on Integration of Stress CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/21/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 20, 2013 CX-010783: Categorical Exclusion Determination Isothermal Compressed Air Energy Storage (ICAES) to Support Renewable Energy Integration - Phase Three CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B5.1 Date: 08/20/2013 Location(s): New Hampshire Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

365

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16, 2011 16, 2011 CX-006772: Categorical Exclusion Determination Coal-Based Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Project: Phase II CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/16/2011 Location(s): Fenton Township, Michigan Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 16, 2011 CX-006771: Categorical Exclusion Determination Coal-Based Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Project: Phase II CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/16/2011 Location(s): Brighton, New York Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 16, 2011 CX-006770: Categorical Exclusion Determination Coal-Based Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Project: Phase II CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/16/2011 Location(s): South Windsor, Connecticut Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

366

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

19, 2010 19, 2010 CX-004491: Categorical Exclusion Determination Site Characterization for Carbon Dioxide Storage from Coal-fired Power Facilities in the Black Warrior Basin of Alabama CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Alabama Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 19, 2010 CX-004490: Categorical Exclusion Determination Utah Expansion Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Sites CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Salt Lake City, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 19, 2010 CX-004489: Categorical Exclusion Determination Thai Process for Heavy Oil CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/19/2010 Location(s): Laramie, Wyoming Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

367

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18, 2010 18, 2010 CX-004473: Categorical Exclusion Determination Deepwater Subsea Test Tree and Intervention Riser System CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 11/18/2010 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 18, 2010 CX-004472: Categorical Exclusion Determination Creating Fractures Past Damage More Effectively With Less Environmental Damage CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 11/18/2010 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 18, 2010 CX-004471: Categorical Exclusion Determination Creating Fractures Past Damage More Effectively With Less Environmental Damage CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 11/18/2010 Location(s): Bainbridge, Georgia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

368

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28, 2013 28, 2013 CX-010899: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pittsburgh Building 65 and Building 74 Loading Dock Railing Project CX(s) Applied: B2.1, B2.3 Date: 06/28/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 27, 2013 CX-010897: Categorical Exclusion Determination Data Mining and Playback of Hybrid Synchrophasor Data for Research and Education CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/27/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 27, 2013 CX-010896: Categorical Exclusion Determination California Low Carbon Fuels Infrastructure Investment Initiative (SUMMARY Categorical Exclusion) CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 06/27/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 27, 2013

369

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28, 2011 28, 2011 CX-006119: Categorical Exclusion Determination Autonomous Inspection of Subsea Facilities (Phase II) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Port Fourchon, Louisiana Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 28, 2011 CX-006117: Categorical Exclusion Determination Flooring Improvements CX(s) Applied: B2.1, B2.5 Date: 06/28/2011 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 23, 2011 CX-006129: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optical Sensors Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/23/2011 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 23, 2011 CX-006127: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wisconsin Biofuels Retail Availability Improvement Network (BRAIN) -

370

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2010 4, 2010 CX-002648: Categorical Exclusion Determination Surface Force Measurements Between Hydrophobic Surfaces CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/04/2010 Location(s): Blacksburg, Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 4, 2010 CX-002647: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Biochemical Techniques for the Extraction of Mercury from Waste Streams Containing Coal CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/04/2010 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 4, 2010 CX-002646: Categorical Exclusion Determination Polymer Nanocomposites for Carbon Dioxide Capture CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/04/2010 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

371

Use Feedwater Economizers for Waste Heat Recovery  

SciTech Connect

This revised ITP tip sheet on feedwater economizers for waste heat recovery provides how-to advice for improving industrial steam systems using low-cost, proven practices and technologies.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery. Progress review No. 41, quarter ending December 31, 1984  

SciTech Connect

Progress reports are presented for field tests and supporting research for the following: chemical flooding; gas displacement; thermal recovery/heavy oil; resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental technology; and microbial enhanced oil recovery.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1985-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery. Progress Review No. 42, quarter ending March 31, 1985  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Progress reports are presented for field tests and supporting research for the following: chemical flooding; gas displacement; thermal recovery/heavy oil; resource assessment technology; extraction technology; environmental technology; and microbial enhanced oil recovery.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1985-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery: Progress review No. 51 quarter ending June 30, 1987  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Progress review on enhanced oil recovery covers: Chemical Flooding /emdash/ Field Projects; Chemical Flooding /emdash/ Supporting Research; Gas Displacement /emdash/ Supporting Research; Thermal Recovery /emdash/ Supporting Research; Resource Assessment Technology; Geoscience; Environmental Technology; Microbial Technology.

Not Available

1988-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

Novel selective surface flow (SSF{trademark}) membranes for the recovery of hydrogen from waste gas streams. Phase 2: Technology development, final report  

SciTech Connect

The objective of Phase II of the Selective Surface Flow Membrane program was Technology Development. Issues addressed were: (i) to develop detailed performance characteristics on a 1 ft{sup 2} multi- tube module and develop design data, (ii) to build a field test rig and complete field evaluation with the 1 ft{sup 2} area membrane system, (iii) to implement membrane preparation technology and demonstrate membrane performance in 3.5 ft long tube, (iv) to complete detailed process design and economic analysis.

Anand, M.; Ludwig, K.A.

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Energy Recovery During Expansion of Compressed Gas Using Power...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recovery During Expansion of Compressed Gas Using Power Plant Low-Quality Heat Sources Opportunity The Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) is...

377

Vice President Biden Announces Recovery Act Funding for 37 Transformat...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

are part of an overall 100 billion investment the Recovery Act is making in creating jobs and driving economic growth through innovation, science and technology. This second...

378

Utilities across America are using Recovery Act funds and smart...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utilities across America are using Recovery Act funds and smart grid technologies to deliver more reliable and affordable power, recover from major storms, and improve operations....

379

ARM - Recovery Act Instruments  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ActRecovery Act Instruments ActRecovery Act Instruments Recovery Act Logo Subscribe FAQs Recovery Act Instruments Recovery Act Fact Sheet March 2010 Poster (PDF, 10MB) External Resources Recovery Act - Federal Recovery Act - DOE Recovery Act - ANL Recovery Act - BNL Recovery Act - LANL Recovery Act - PNNL Comments? We would love to hear from you! Send us a note below or call us at 1-888-ARM-DATA. Send Recovery Act Instruments These pages provide a breakdown of the new instruments planned for installation among the permanent and mobile ARM sites. In addition, several instruments will be purchased for use throughout the facility and deployed as needed. These are considered "facility spares" and are included in the table below. View All | Hide All ARM Aerial Facility Instrument Title Instrument Mentor Measurement Group Measurements

380

Recovery Act Open House  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recovery Act Open House North Wind Environmental was one of three local small businesses that received Recovery Funding for projects at DOE's Idaho Site. Members of the community...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Application of Reservoir Characterization and Advanced Technology to Improve Recovery and Economics in a Lower Quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate Reservoir, Class II  

SciTech Connect

The Oxy operated Class 2 Project at West Welch Project is designed to demonstrate how the use of advanced technology can improve the economics of miscible CO2 injection projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate reservoirs. The research and design phase (Budget Period 1) primarily involved advanced reservoir demonstration characterization. The current demonstration phase (Budget Period 2) is the implementation of the reservoir management plan for an optimum miscible CO2 flood design based on the reservoir characterization.

Hickman, T. Scott; Justice, James J.; Egg, Rebecca

2001-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

382

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2009 7, 2009 CX-000315: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Jersey Revision 1 - Multifamily Energy Efficiency Improvement Pilot (MEEIP) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.3, B1.4, B1.5, B1.7, B1.15, B1.23, B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 11/17/2009 Location(s): New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 17, 2009 CX-000314: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Jersey Revision 1 - Low-Interest Loan Program for Residential Energy Efficiency CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.2, B2.3, B2.5, A1, A9, B1.3, B1.4, B1.5, B1.7, B5.1 Date: 11/17/2009 Location(s): New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 17, 2009 CX-000313: Categorical Exclusion Determination

383

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23, 2009 23, 2009 CX-000321: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kentucky Revision 2 - Green and Healthy Schools Program (GHS) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.3, B1.4, B1.5, B1.7, B1.15, B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.3, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 11/23/2009 Location(s): Kentucky Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 23, 2009 CX-000320: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kentucky Revision 2 - Kentucky Farm Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Partnership CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.3, B1.4, B1.5, B1.7, B1.15, B1.22, B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1, B5.12 Date: 11/23/2009 Location(s): Kentucky Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 23, 2009 CX-000319: Categorical Exclusion Determination

384

Available Technologies - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory  

Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies. ... and gravity modeling engines developed at Berkeley Lab and elsewhere. ...

385

Available Technologies: Synthesis of High Quality Graphene  

Medical Imaging Mouse Models; Research Tools; Developing World; Energy. Energy Efficiency; Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies.

386

Available Technologies: Nanometer Precision Manipulation and ...  

Medical Imaging Mouse Models; Research Tools; Developing World; Energy. Energy Efficiency; Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies.

387

Recovery Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 12, 2010 August 12, 2010 Department of Energy Paves Way for Additional Clean Energy Projects and Jobs Through Manufacturing Solicitation Recovery Act Funds to Support New Renewable Energy Manufacturing Projects August 2, 2010 Department of Energy Announces $188 Million for Small Business Technology Commercialization Includes $73 million in Recovery Act Investments to Help Small Businesses Bring Clean Energy Ideas to the Marketplace July 22, 2010 Secretary Chu Announces Six Projects to Convert Captured CO2 Emissions from Industrial Sources into Useful Products $106 Million Recovery Act Investment will Reduce CO2 Emissions and Mitigate Climate Change July 21, 2010 DOE Hosts Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles Washington, DC - On Thursday, July 22, 2010, the Department of Energy will

388

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

362: Categorical Exclusion Determination 362: Categorical Exclusion Determination Heavy-Duty Liquified Natural Gas Drayage Truck Project CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12/11/2009 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 11, 2009 CX-000363: Categorical Exclusion Determination United Parcel Service (UPS) Ontario-Las Vegas Liquified Natural Gas Corridor CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12/11/2009 Location(s): Diamond Bar, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 11, 2009 CX-000415: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of Most Promising Carbon Capture and Sequestration Formations in the Central Rocky Mountain Region CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/11/2009 Location(s): Socorro, New Mexico

389

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10, 2009 10, 2009 CX-000336: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolinas Blue Skies & Green Jobs Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Durham, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000335: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolinas Blue Skies & Green Jobs Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Asheville, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000334: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolinas Blue Skies & Green Jobs Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Raleigh, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

390

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 27, 2010 January 27, 2010 CX-000997: Categorical Exclusion Determination Biodiesel Infrastructure Project (PrairieFire) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 01/27/2010 Location(s): Monona, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 27, 2010 CX-000998: Categorical Exclusion Determination Biodiesel Infrastructure Project (Coulee) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 01/27/2010 Location(s): Blair, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 27, 2010 CX-000999: Categorical Exclusion Determination Biodiesel In-line Blending Project (Innovation) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B5.1 Date: 01/27/2010 Location(s): Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

391

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 1, 2010 September 1, 2010 CX-003669: Categorical Exclusion Determination Green Energy Works! Targeted Grants - Ecogy Pennsylvania Systems LLC- Longwood Garden Solar CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 09/01/2010 Location(s): Chester County, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 31, 2010 CX-003665: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Performance Buildings Program - Hawthorne Hotel CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/31/2010 Location(s): Salem, Massachusetts Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 30, 2010 CX-003664: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Performance Sustainable Energy Research Laboratory CX(s) Applied: A11, B5.1 Date: 08/30/2010 Location(s): Lexington, Kentucky

392

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16, 2010 16, 2010 CX-003449: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency through Clean Combined Heat and Power (CHP) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B1.24, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 08/16/2010 Location(s): New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 16, 2010 CX-003448: Categorical Exclusion Determination Curriculum for Commissioning Energy Efficient Buildings CX(s) Applied: A1, A11 Date: 08/16/2010 Location(s): Portland, Oregon Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 16, 2010 CX-003443: Categorical Exclusion Determination Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture for Existing Post-Combustion Boilers by Self-Concentrating Amine Absorbent CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, A14

393

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10, 2009 10, 2009 CX-000369: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Jersey Compressed Natural Gas Refuse Trucks, Shuttle Buses and Infrastructure CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Rockaway, New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000368: Categorical Exclusion Determination New York State Alternative Fuel Vehicle & Infrastructure Deployment CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Albany, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 10, 2009 CX-000367: Categorical Exclusion Determination Long Island Regional Energy Collaborative CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/10/2009 Location(s): Bay Shore, New York

394

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29, 2010 29, 2010 CX-003327: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geological and Geotechnical Site Investigations for the Design of a Carbon Dioxide Rich Flue Gas Direct Injection CX(s) Applied: A8, A9, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 07/29/2010 Location(s): Fairbanks, Alaska Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 29, 2010 CX-003326: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Sequential Dual Evaporator Cycle for Refrigerators CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/29/2010 Location(s): Evansville, Indiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 29, 2010 CX-003325: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Sequential Dual Evaporator Cycle for Refrigerators CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/29/2010 Location(s): Benton Harbor, Michigan

395

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 18, 2010 January 18, 2010 CX-000707: Categorical Exclusion Determination Florida - Clean Fuel LLC (Shovel Ready Grant project) State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.31, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 01/18/2010 Location(s): Lakeland, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 18, 2010 CX-000731: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building 4 Equipment Decommissioning CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/18/2010 Location(s): Albany, Oregon Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 15, 2010 CX-000704: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electric Drive Semiconductor Manufacturing Center - Advanced Battery Program CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.31 Date: 01/15/2010 Location(s): Youngwood, Pennsylvania

396

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2010 3, 2010 CX-003928: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program: Strengthening Building Retrofit Markets CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 09/23/2010 Location(s): Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 23, 2010 CX-003927: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program: Strengthening Building Retrofit Markets in Target Area (Kitsap County) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 09/23/2010 Location(s): Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 23, 2010 CX-003926: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program: Strengthening Building Retrofit Markets and Stimulating Energy Efficiency Action CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1

397

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2011 0, 2011 CX-007030: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chemistry of Cathode Surfaces: Fundamental Investigation and Tailoring of Electronic Behavior CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): Cambridge, Massachusetts Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 19, 2011 CX-007055: Categorical Exclusion Determination Silicon-Nanowire-Based Lithium-ion Batteries with Doubling Energy Density CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Pawcatuck, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 19, 2011 CX-007052: Categorical Exclusion Determination Silicon-Nanowire-Based Lithium-Ion Batteries with Doubling Energy Density CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/19/2011 Location(s): Menlo Park, California

398

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-006915: Categorical Exclusion Determination Compressed Natural Gas/Infrastructure Development CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Ogden, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 28, 2011 CX-006914: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Kansas City, Missouri Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 28, 2011 CX-006912: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Kansas City, Kansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy September 28, 2011 CX-006967: Categorical Exclusion Determination

399

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2010 2, 2010 CX-001674: Categorical Exclusion Determination Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Infrastructure Program (Veolia) CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.31, B2.5, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): Veolia, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 22, 2010 CX-001672: Categorical Exclusion Determination Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Infrastructure Program (Miami) CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.31, B2.5, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/22/2010 Location(s): Miami, Florida Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 22, 2010 CX-001670: Categorical Exclusion Determination Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Infrastructure Program (Florida) CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.31, B2.5, A11, B5.1

400

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

23, 2012 23, 2012 CX-008493: Categorical Exclusion Determination Liquid Carbon Dioxide Slurry for Feeding Low Rank Coal (LRC) Gasifiers CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07/23/2012 Location(s): Texas, Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory July 23, 2012 CX-008492: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Dioxide Capture from Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Gas Streams Using the Ammonium Carbonate-Ammonium Bicarbonate Process CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07/23/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory July 23, 2012 CX-008491: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Dioxide Capture from Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Gas Streams Using the Ammonium Carbonate-Ammonium Bicarbonate Process CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/23/2012

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2010 6, 2010 CX-001813: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lean Gasoline System Development for Fuel Efficient Small Cars (Milford) CX(s) Applied: B3.6, A9 Date: 04/26/2010 Location(s): Milford, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 26, 2010 CX-001819: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lean Gasoline System Development for Fuel Efficient Small Cars (Pontiac) CX(s) Applied: B3.6, A9 Date: 04/26/2010 Location(s): Pontiac, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 26, 2010 CX-001817: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lean Gasoline System Development for Fuel Efficient Small Cars (Warren) CX(s) Applied: B3.6, A9 Date: 04/26/2010 Location(s): Warren, Michigan

402

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2010 1, 2010 CX-002341: Categorical Exclusion Determination Connecticut Clean Cities Future Fuels Project - Bloomfield CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/11/2010 Location(s): Bloomfield, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 11, 2010 CX-002340: Categorical Exclusion Determination Connecticut Clean Cities Future Fuels Project - Bridgeport CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/11/2010 Location(s): Bridgeport, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 11, 2010 CX-002338: Categorical Exclusion Determination Connecticut Clean Cities Future Fuels Project - Hartford CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/11/2010 Location(s): Hartford, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

403

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 31, 2011 March 31, 2011 CX-005483: Categorical Exclusion Determination National Biodiesel Foundation: Biodiesel Terminal Installation Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/31/2011 Location(s): Port Chester, New York Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 31, 2011 CX-005482: Categorical Exclusion Determination Portable Raman Gas Composition Monitor CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/31/2011 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 29, 2011 CX-005481: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grant for State Sponsored Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects - Montclair State University Solar Farm CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/29/2011 Location(s): Montclair, New Jersey

404

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14, 2011 14, 2011 CX-005037: Categorical Exclusion Determination Field Test of Carbon Dioxide-Methane Method for Production of Gas Hydrate CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 01/14/2011 Location(s): North Slope Borough, Alaska Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 13, 2011 CX-004991: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohio Advanced Transportation Partnership (OATP) - Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/13/2011 Location(s): Hamilton, Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 13, 2011 CX-004990: Categorical Exclusion Determination City of Cerritos, Photovoltaic System at the Cerritos Corporate Yard CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/13/2011 Location(s): Cerritos, California

405

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

24, 2010 24, 2010 CX-001214: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kilby Correctional Facility Boiler Replacement CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/24/2010 Location(s): Mount Meigs, Alabama Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 24, 2010 CX-001213: Categorical Exclusion Determination Decatur Work Release 10 Kilowatt Photovoltaic Array CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/24/2010 Location(s): Decatur, Alabama Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 24, 2010 CX-001206: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tehachapi Wind Energy Storage CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.13, B3.6, B4.4, B4.6, B5.1 Date: 03/24/2010 Location(s): Kern County, California Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy

406

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2010 , 2010 CX-001506: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program - Renewable Energy Grants CX(s) Applied: A11, B5.1 Date: 04/01/2010 Location(s): Conley, Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 1, 2010 CX-001510: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program - Clean Energy Property Rebate CX(s) Applied: A11, B5.1 Date: 04/01/2010 Location(s): Valdosta, Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory April 1, 2010 CX-001504: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ocean Wind Energy Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.1, A9, A11 Date: 04/01/2010 Location(s): Chapel Hill, North Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

407

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2010 22, 2010 CX-000743: Categorical Exclusion Determination Site Characterization for Carbon Dioxide Storage from Coal-fired Power Facilities in the Black Warrior Basin of Alabama CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 01/22/2010 Location(s): Tuscaloosa, Alabama Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 21, 2010 CX-000708: Categorical Exclusion Determination Utah All Inclusive Statewide Alternative Fuels Transportation and Education Outreach Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/21/2010 Location(s): Murray, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory January 18, 2010 CX-000705: Categorical Exclusion Determination Florida - Sunshine State Buildings Parking Lot Canopies - State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.24, B2.1, B5.1

408

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13, 2011 13, 2011 CX-005817: Categorical Exclusion Determination Economic Development Program CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 05/13/2011 Location(s): Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 11, 2011 CX-005821: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Energy Economic Development Initiative - Maryland Environmental Service II CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.1 Date: 05/11/2011 Location(s): Millersville, Maryland Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 11, 2011 CX-005820: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Energy Economic Development Initiative - Maryland Environmental Service I CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/11/2011 Location(s): Millersville, Maryland

409

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2010 2, 2010 CX-001022: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of an Autogas Network (Lithia Springs) CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.5, B3.6, B5.1 Date: 03/02/2010 Location(s): Lithia Springs, Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 1, 2010 CX-000957: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Jersey Compressed Natural Gas Refuse Trucks, Shuttle Buses and Infrastructure CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/01/2010 Location(s): Trenton, New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 1, 2010 CX-001038: Categorical Exclusion Determination Idaho Petroleum Reduction Leadership Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, B5.1 Date: 03/01/2010 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

410

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2010 8, 2010 CX-004665: Categorical Exclusion Determination On-Site Controlled Environment Agriculture Production of Biomass and Biofuels CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/08/2010 Location(s): Columbia, South Carolina Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 8, 2010 CX-004664: Categorical Exclusion Determination On-Site Controlled Environment Agriculture Production of Biomass and Biofuels CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/08/2010 Location(s): Tucson, Arizona Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 7, 2010 CX-004687: Categorical Exclusion Determination Centralized Cryptographic Key Management (CKMS) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.2 Date: 12/07/2010 Location(s): Oak Ridge, Tennessee

411

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2010 6, 2010 CX-002907: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Start Propane Refueling, Vehicle Incentive and Outreach (Summary Categorical Exclusion) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07/06/2010 Location(s): Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 1, 2010 CX-002833: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B4.4, A1, A9, A11, B1.7, B5.1 Date: 07/01/2010 Location(s): Salem, Oregon Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory July 1, 2010 CX-002835: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pennsylvania Energy Harvest Mined Project Grants - Mains Dairy Farm Biogas Project CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/01/2010

412

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-006042: Categorical Exclusion Determination Conversion of Low-Rank Wyoming Coals into Gasoline by Direct Liquefaction CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/08/2011 Location(s): Laramie, Wyoming Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 7, 2011 CX-006050: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B5.1 Date: 06/07/2011 Location(s): Kansas City, Missouri Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 7, 2011 CX-006054: Categorical Exclusion Determination San Diego Gas & Electric Borrego Springs Microgrid Demo (Utility Integration of Distributed Energy Storage Systems) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.11, B4.4 Date: 06/07/2011 Location(s): Borrego Springs, California

413

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2010 0, 2010 CX-002626: Categorical Exclusion Determination Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 06/10/2010 Location(s): Kansas City, Kansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 10, 2010 CX-002625: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pennsylvania E85 Corridor Project - Sheetz Gas Station/Store #191 CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/10/2010 Location(s): Carlisle, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory June 10, 2010 CX-002622: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pennsylvania E85 Corridor Project - Sheetz Gas Station/Store #426 CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/10/2010 Location(s): Carlisle, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

414

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2010 8, 2010 CX-002510: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rhode Island Non-Utility Scale Renewable Energy Loan, Grants Initiative CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/28/2010 Location(s): Rhode Island Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 28, 2010 CX-002515: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program - Clean Energy Property Rebate Program CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 05/28/2010 Location(s): Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 27, 2010 CX-002522: Categorical Exclusion Determination Danada Solar Energy and Lighting Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/27/2010 Location(s): Wheaton, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

415

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16, 2010 16, 2010 CX-004689: Categorical Exclusion Determination Single-Molecule Imaging System Combined with Nano-Fluidic Chip to Understand Fluid Flow in Shale Gas CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Golden, Colorado Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 16, 2010 CX-004688: Categorical Exclusion Determination Single-Molecule Imaging System Combined with Nano-Fluidic Chip to Understand Fluid Flow in Shale Gas CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Rolla, Missouri Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 16, 2010 CX-004755: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Energy Program: Program Support/Administration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 12/16/2010 Location(s): Maine Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

416

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18, 2010 18, 2010 CX-001313: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grants for State-Sponsored Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects - New Jersey Transit Solar CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/18/2010 Location(s): Kearny, New Jersey Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 18, 2010 CX-001312: Categorical Exclusion Determination State Facilities Retrofit Program: Commissioning/Re-Commissioning and Metering Projects CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/18/2010 Location(s): Georgia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 18, 2010 CX-001315: Categorical Exclusion Determination Propane Truck Deployment CX(s) Applied: A1, A7, A9, B5.1 Date: 03/18/2010 Location(s): San Antonio, Texas

417

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2010 22, 2010 CX-001294: Categorical Exclusion Determination Heavy-Duty Natural Gas Drainage Truck Replacement Program in the South Coast Air Basin CX(s) Applied: A7, A9, A11 Date: 03/22/2010 Location(s): Los Angeles, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 22, 2010 CX-001297: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Start Propane Refueling, Vehicle Incentive and Outreach CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 03/22/2010 Location(s): Los Angeles, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 22, 2010 CX-001296: Categorical Exclusion Determination B2,3,5,17,19 and 36 Utility Meter Install CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B2.2 Date: 03/22/2010 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia

418

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2010 8, 2010 CX-000995: Categorical Exclusion Determination Craftmaster Manufacturing Inc. Combined Heat and Power Project CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.31, B5.1 Date: 02/08/2010 Location(s): Towanda, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 8, 2010 CX-000996: Categorical Exclusion Determination Divine Providence Hospital-Susquehanna Health Combined Heat and Power Project CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.31, B5.1 Date: 02/08/2010 Location(s): Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 7, 2010 CX-000766: Categorical Exclusion Determination New York State Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Infrastructure Deployment - New Vehicle Purchase CX(s) Applied: A7, A11

419

SECONDARY NATURAL GAS RECOVERY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN: APPLICATION OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES IN A FIELD DEMONSTRATION SITE, HENDERSON DOME, WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The principal objectives of this project were to test and evaluate technologies that would result in improved characterization of fractured natural-gas reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin. The Bureau of Economic Geology (Bureau) worked jointly with industry partner Atlas Resources, Inc. to design, execute, and evaluate several experimental tests toward this end. The experimental tests were of two types: (1) tests leading to a low-cost methodology whereby small-scale microfractures observed in matrix grains of sidewall cores can be used to deduce critical properties of large-scale fractures that control natural-gas production and (2) tests that verify methods whereby robust seismic shear (S) waves can be generated to detect and map fractured reservoir facies. The grain-scale microfracture approach to characterizing rock facies was developed in an ongoing Bureau research program that started before this Appalachian Basin study began. However, the method had not been tested in a wide variety of fracture systems, and the tectonic setting of rocks in the Appalachian Basin composed an ideal laboratory for perfecting the methodology. As a result of this Appalachian study, a low-cost commercial procedure now exists that will allow Appalachian operators to use scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of thin sections extracted from oriented sidewall cores to infer the spatial orientation, relative geologic timing, and population density of large-scale fracture systems in reservoir sandstones. These attributes are difficult to assess using conventional techniques. In the Henderson Dome area, large quartz-lined regional fractures having N20E strikes, and a subsidiary set of fractures having N70W strikes, are prevalent. An innovative method was also developed for obtaining the stratigraphic and geographic tops of sidewall cores. With currently deployed sidewall coring devices, no markings from which top orientation can be obtained are made on the sidewall core itself during drilling. The method developed in this study involves analysis of the surface morphology of the broken end of the core as a top indicator. Together with information on the working of the tool (rotation direction), fracture-surface features, such as arrest lines and plume structures, not only give a top direction for the cores but also indicate the direction of fracture propagation in the tough, fine-grained Cataract/Medina sandstones. The study determined that microresistivity logs or other image logs can be used to obtain accurate sidewall core azimuths and to determine the precise depths of the sidewall cores. Two seismic S-wave technologies were developed in this study. The first was a special explosive package that, when detonated in a conventional seismic shot hole, produces more robust S-waves than do standard seismic explosives. The importance of this source development is that it allows S-wave seismic data to be generated across all of the Appalachian Basin. Previously, Appalachian operators have not been able to use S-wave seismic technology to detect fractured reservoirs because the industry-standard S-wave energy source, the horizontal vibrator, is not a practical source option in the heavy timber cover that extends across most of the basin. The second S-wave seismic technology that was investigated was used to verify that standard P-wave seismic sources can create robust downgoing S-waves by P-to-S mode conversion in the shallow stratigraphic layering in the Appalachian Basin. This verification was done by recording and analyzing a 3-component vertical seismic profile (VSP) in the Atlas Montgomery No. 4 well at Henderson Dome, Mercer County, Pennsylvania. The VSP data confirmed that robust S-waves are generated by P-to-S mode conversion at the basinwide Onondaga stratigraphic level. Appalachian operators can thus use converted-mode seismic technology to create S-wave images of fractured and unfractured rock systems throughout the basin.

BOB A. HARDAGE; ELOISE DOHERTY; STEPHEN E. LAUBACH; TUCKER F. HENTZ

1998-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

420

NETL: Exploration Technologies - EOR Process Drawings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Exploration & Production Technologies Exploration Technologies - EOR Process Drawings Listed below are links to cross-sectional illustrations of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Federal Energy Management Program: New and Underutilized Technology...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy Recovery Ventilation Systems to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: New and Underutilized Technology: Commercial Energy Recovery Ventilation Systems...

422

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Energy Technology National Energy Technology Laboratory Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by National Energy Technology Laboratory. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 25, 2013 CX-010917: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fate of Methane Emitted from Dissociating Marine Hydrates: Modeling, Laboratory, and Field Constraints CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.6 Date: 09/25/2013 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 25, 2013 CX-010916: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fate of Methane Emitted from Dissociating Marine Hydrates: Modeling, Laboratory, and Field Constraints CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.6 Date: 09/25/2013 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

423

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Advanced Technology Vehicles  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Vehicles Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD May 29, 2012 CX-008810: Categorical Exclusion Determination One Nevada Optimization of Microwave Telecommunication System CX(s) Applied: B1.19, B4.6 Date: 05/29/2012 Location(s): Nevada, Nevada Offices(s): Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program January 24, 2012 CX-007677: Categorical Exclusion Determination Project Eagle Phase 1 Direct Wafer/Cell Solar Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 01/24/2012 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program

424

APPLICATION OF RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE RECOVERY AND ECONOMICS IN A LOWER QUALITY SHALLOW SHELF SAN ANDRES RESERVOIR  

SciTech Connect

The OXY-operated Class 2 Project at West Welch is designed to demonstrate how the use of advanced technology can improve the economics of miscible CO{sub 2} injection projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate reservoirs. The research and design phase (Budget Period 1) primarily involved advanced reservoir characterization. The current demonstration phase (Budget Period 2) is the implementation of the reservoir management plan for an optimum miscible CO{sub 2} flood design based on the reservoir characterization. Although Budget Period 1 for the Project officially ended 12/31/96, reservoir characterization and simulation work continued during the Budget Period 2. During the seventh annual reporting period (8/3/00-8/2/01) covered by this report, work continued on interpretation of the interwell seismic data to create porosity and permeability profiles which were distributed into the reservoir geostatistically. The initial interwell seismic CO{sub 2} monitor survey was conducted and the acquired data processed and interpretation started. Only limited well work and facility construction were conducted in the project area. The CO{sub 2} injection initiated in October 1997 was continued, although the operator had to modify the operating plan in response to low injection rates, well performance and changes in CO{sub 2} supply. CO{sub 2} injection was focused in a smaller area to increase the reservoir processing rate. By the end of the reporting period three producers had shown sustained oil rate increases and six wells had experienced gas (CO{sub 2}) breakthrough.

Tom Beebe

2003-05-05T23:59:59.000Z

425

APPLICATION OF RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE RECOVERY AND ECONOMICS IN A LOWER QUALITY SHALLOW SHELF SAN ANDRES RESERVOIR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The OXY-operated Class 2 Project at West Welch is designed to demonstrate how the use of advanced technology can improve the economics of miscible CO{sub 2} injection projects in lower quality Shallow Shelf Carbonate reservoirs. The research and design phase (Budget Period 1) primarily involved advanced reservoir characterization. The current demonstration phase (Budget Period 2) is the implementation of the reservoir management plan for an optimum miscible CO{sub 2} flood design based on the reservoir characterization. Although Budget Period 1 for the Project officially ended 12/31/96, reservoir characterization and simulation work continued during the Budget Period 2. During the fifth and sixth annual reporting periods (8/3/98-8/2/00) covered by this report, work continued on interpretation of the cross well seismic data to create porosity and permeability profiles which were distributed into the reservoir geostatistically. The initial interwell seismic CO{sub 2} monitor survey was conducted, the acquired data processed and interpretation started. Only limited well work and facility construction was conducted in the project area. The CO{sub 2} injection initiated in October 1997 was continued, although the operator had to modify the operating plan in response to low injection rates, well performance and changes in CO{sub 2} supply. CO{sub 2} injection was focused in a smaller area to increase the reservoir processing rate. By the end of the reporting period three producers had shown sustained oil rate increases and ten wells had experienced gas (CO{sub 2}) breakthrough.

T. Scott Hickman; James J. Justice

2002-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

426

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

13, 2011 13, 2011 CX-006752: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency Vehicles for Sustainable Mobility - Department of Energy Graduate Automotive Technology Education Center of Excellence CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 09/13/2011 Location(s): Columbus, Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 13, 2011 CX-006751: Categorical Exclusion Determination University of Alabama at Birmingham Graduate Automotive Technology Education Center for Lightweight Materials and Manufacturing for Automotive Technologies CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 09/13/2011 Location(s): Birmingham, Alabama Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 13, 2011 CX-006748: Categorical Exclusion Determination

427

of oil yields from enhanced oil recovery  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

oil yields from enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and CO oil yields from enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and CO 2 storage capacity in depleted oil reservoirs. The primary goal of the project is to demonstrate that remaining oil can be economically produced using CO 2 -EOR technology in untested areas of the United States. The Citronelle Field appears to be an ideal site for concurrent CO 2 storage and EOR because the field is composed of sandstone reservoirs

428

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery. Progress Review No. 39, quarter ending June 30, 1984  

SciTech Connect

Progress reports are presented for field tests and supporting research for the following: chemical flooding; gas displacement; thermal recovery/heavy oil; resource assessment technology; extraction technology; and microbial enhanced oil recovery.

Linville, B. (ed.)

1984-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 5, 2011 October 5, 2011 CX-007114: Categorical Exclusion Determination Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)/Infrastructure Development (Station Upgrade) CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10/05/2011 Location(s): West Jordan, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 5, 2011 CX-007112: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geologic Characterization of the South Georgia Rift Basin - 3-Dimension Seismic Survey CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.1 Date: 10/05/2011 Location(s): Colleton County, South Carolina Office(s): Fossil Energy October 5, 2011 CX-007111: Categorical Exclusion Determination Shallow Carbon Sequestration Demonstration Project (Iatan Generating Station) CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 10/05/2011 Location(s): Platte County, Missouri

430

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-006926: Categorical Exclusion Determination Next Generation Inverter Design CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Golden, Colorado Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Savannah River Operations Office September 28, 2011 CX-006921: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Cells CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 28, 2011 CX-006919: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Cells CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): University Park, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Savannah River

431

Mass and Heat Recovery  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In the last few years heat recovery was under spot and in air conditioning fields usually we use heat recovery by different types of heat exchangers. The heat exchanging between the exhaust air from the building with the fresh air to the building (air to air heat exchanger). In my papers I use (water to air heat exchanger) as a heat recovery and I use the water as a mass recovery. The source of mass and heat recovery is the condensate water which we were dispose and connect it to the drain lines.

Hindawai, S. M.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Information Services  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recovery and Reinvestment Act Recovery and Reinvestment Act Information Services American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Information Services American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Information Services American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

433

Recovery Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 2011 21, 2011 Smart grid technology installations provided not only new work, but new customers for Narrows Electric owner Gary Miklethun, far l., and his team, from l. to r., Ken Dehart, Rodney Thomas and Dave Brosie. Smart Grid Technology Gives Small Business New Light Gary Miklethun, the owner of Narrows Electric, a small electrical contractor in Gig Harbor, Wash., that specializes in residential and small commercial projects, definitely felt it when the economy slowed down. But installing new smart grid technology in 500 homes not only gave his team new work, but new customers. September 21, 2011 Communications and Guidance Issued Guidance: Throughout the life of the Recovery Act, it has at times been necessary to issue guidance around certain policies or procedures.

434

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery: Progress review No. 47, Quarter ending June 1986  

SciTech Connect

Progress reports are presented for field projects and supporting research for the following: chemical flooding; gas displacement; thermal recovery; resource assessment; environmental technology; and microbial technology. (AT)

Not Available

1987-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Recovery Act | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 7, 2011 February 7, 2011 Mechanics train with plasma arc cutting equipment at the Paducah Site | Courtesy of Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant 240 Jobs Later: The Recovery Act's Impact at the Paducah Site Workers at the Department of Energy's Paducah Site are doing great things with the training they've received as part of the Recovery Act. January 25, 2011 Watercolor print of the Aldo Leopold Nature Center (ALNC) with new facilities. How a Wisconsin Nature Center is Leading by Example With funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, this Wisconsin nature center will be at the forefront in demonstrating the latest energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies to thousands of visitors every year. January 24, 2011 Vids 4 Grids: Surge Arresters and Switchgears A new video series is increasing general public knowledge of the cutting

436

Heat and Seed Recovery Technology Project  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The objective of this work is to address technical issues related to both the MHD topping and bottoming cycles and to their integration. Design information will be obtained through modeling and experimentation. This information, together with the insults of long duration testing at DOE`s Coal Fired Flow Facility (CFFF) and Component Development and Integration Facility (CDIF), can be used to reliably design the first-generation MHD retrofit plant. Work during the reporting period focused on the following tasks: (1) computer modeling of the integrated topping-cycle power train (combustor/nozzle/channel/diffuser); (2) evaluation of materials for the bottoming steam cycle; (3) systems analysis of an MHD/CO{sub 2} cyde; and (4) the completion of a topical report on the reactivation of the ANL superconducting magnet system. Accomplishments in these areas are described briefly.

Swift, W.M.; Petrick, M.; Natesan, K.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Heat and Seed Recovery Technology Project  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The objective of this work is to address technical issues related to both the MHD topping and bottoming cycles and to their integration. Design information will be obtained through modeling and experimentation. This information, together with the insults of long duration testing at DOE's Coal Fired Flow Facility (CFFF) and Component Development and Integration Facility (CDIF), can be used to reliably design the first-generation MHD retrofit plant. Work during the reporting period focused on the following tasks: (1) computer modeling of the integrated topping-cycle power train (combustor/nozzle/channel/diffuser); (2) evaluation of materials for the bottoming steam cycle; (3) systems analysis of an MHD/CO[sub 2] cyde; and (4) the completion of a topical report on the reactivation of the ANL superconducting magnet system. Accomplishments in these areas are described briefly.

Swift, W.M.; Petrick, M.; Natesan, K.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

RECOVERY Health Information Technology (HIT) Testing ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Our work supports the VHA Security Architect in developing and ... OCIO in which we analyzed the security architecture plans (or ... 1.3.3 Smart Grid ...

2013-04-09T23:59:59.000Z

439

Contracts for field projects and supporting research on enhanced oil recovery. Progress review No. 43, quarter ending June 30, 1985  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Progress reports are presented for field projects and supporting research for the following: (1) chemical flooding; gas displacement thermal recovery/heavy oil; resource assessment technology; extraction technology;environmental technology; and microbial technology. (AT)

Not Available

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

EM American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Update  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recovery Act Program Recovery Act Program www.em.doe.gov 1 Thomas Johnson, Jr. Recovery Act Program Director PRESENTED TO: Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) December 5, 2011 EM's Mission "Complete the safe cleanup of the environmental legacy brought about from five decades of nuclear weapons www.em.doe.gov 2 nuclear weapons development, production, and Government- sponsored nuclear energy research." EM's Recovery Act Program $6 Billion at 17 sites (12 states) Accelerated existing scope › Soil and groundwater remediation › Radioactive solid waste disposition › Facility decontamination & decommissioning www.em.doe.gov 3 Selected projects were "shovel-ready" › Fully-defined cost, scope, and schedule › Established regulatory framework › Proven technology

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

OE Recovery Act Blog | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recovery Recovery Act Blog OE Recovery Act Blog RSS September 20, 2013 Electrical transmission lines cross a snow-covered field in Dallas Dam, Oregon. | Energy Department photo. Top 9 Things You Didn't Know About America's Power Grid Ever wonder how electricity gets to your home? Test your knowledge with these top power grid facts. July 11, 2013 Demand Response: Lessons Learned with an Eye to the Future Under the Recovery Act, the Energy Department awarded $3.5 billion in funds to the electricity industry, including OG&E, to help catalyze the adoption of smart grid tools, technologies and techniques such as demand response that are designed to increase the electric grid's flexibility, reliability, efficiency, affordability, and resiliency. Understanding lessons learned from these projects is vital.

442

Tenth oil recovery conference  

SciTech Connect

The Tertiary Oil Recovery Project is sponsored by the State of Kansas to introduce Kansas producers to the economic potential of enhanced recovery methods for Kansas fields. Specific objectives include estimation of the state-wide tertiary oil resource, identification and evaluation of the most applicable processes, dissemination of technical information to producers, occasional collaboration on recovery projects, laboratory studies on Kansas applicable processes, and training of students and operators in tertiary oil recovery methods. Papers have been processed separately for inclusion on the data base.

Sleeper, R. (ed.)

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

Cyanidation Recovery Process  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Heat Treatment of Black Dross for the Production of a Value Added Material ... Leaching Studies for Metals Recovery from Waste Printed Wiring Boards (PWBs).

444

Available Technologies: Black Ge-based On Crystalline Amorphous ...  

Medical Imaging Mouse Models; Research Tools; Developing World; Energy. Energy Efficiency; Energy Storage and Recovery; Renewable Energy; Environmental Technologies.

445

Pillars of Recovery | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pillars of Recovery Pillars of Recovery Pillars of Recovery July 29, 2010 - 4:00pm Addthis Energy Efficiency - $12.0 billion Helping millions of American families cut utility bills by making homes and appliances more energy efficient. $5 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program $3.1 billion for the State Energy Program $2.73 billion for Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants $454 million for Retrofit ramp-ups in energy efficiency $346 million for Energy efficient building technologies $300 million for Energy Efficient Appliance Rebates / ENERGY STAR® $256 million for the Industrial Technologies Program $104 million for National Laboratory Facilities $18 million for Small Business Clean Energy Innovation Projects Environmental Cleanup - $6.0 billion Creating jobs and reducing the legacy cold war footprint of the Department

446

CX-007109: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Determination CX-007109: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Clean Cities Transportation Sector Petroleum Reduction Technology Program CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1...

447

CX-005583: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Determination CX-005583: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Clean Cities Transportation Sector Petroleum Reduction Technologies Programs CX(s) Applied: B5.1...

448

CX-009452: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Determination CX-009452: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Clean Cities Transportation Petroleum Reduction Technologies Program CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 1102...

449

CX-006964: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Determination CX-006964: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Clean Cities Transportation Sector Petroleum Reduction Technologies Program CX(s) Applied: A1 Date:...

450

CX-006532: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exclusion Determination Evaluating and Commercializing a Solvent-Based Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 08222011 Location(s): Lockhart, Texas...

451

CX-006757: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exclusion Determination Evaluating and Commercializing a Solvent Based Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 09132011 Location(s): Smiley, Texas...

452

Disaster Resiliency and Recovery: Capabilities (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is the nation's leader in energy efficient and renewable energy technologies, practices, and strategies. For the last 15 years, NREL has provided expertise, tools, and innovations to private industry; federal, state, and local governments; non-profit organizations; and communities during the planning, recovery, and rebuilding stages after disaster strikes.

Not Available

2012-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Disaster Resiliency and Recovery: Capabilities (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is the nation's leader in energy efficient and renewable energy technologies, practices, and strategies. For the last 15 years, NREL has provided expertise, tools, and innovations to private industry; federal, state, and local governments; non-profit organizations; and communities during the planning, recovery, and rebuilding stages after disaster strikes.

2012-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Reactivation of an Idle Lease to Increase Heavy Oil Recovery through Application of Conventional Steam Drive Technology in a Low-Dip Slope and Reservoir in the Midway-Sunset Field, San Jaoquin Basin, California, Class III  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objective of this project is not just to produce oil from the Pru Fee property, but rather to test which operational strategies best optimize total oil recovery at economically acceptable rates of production and production costs.

Schamel, S.

2001-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

455

Reactivation of an Idle Lease to Increase Heavy Oil Recovery through Application of Conventional Steam Drive Technology in a Low-Dip Slope and Reservoir in the Midway-Sunset Field, San Jaoquin Basin, California, Class III  

SciTech Connect

The objective of the project is not just to commercially produce oil from the Pru Fee property, but rather to test which operational strategies best optimize total oil recovery at economically acceptable rates of production volumes and costs.

Schamel, Steven; Deo, Milind; Deets, Mike

2002-02-21T23:59:59.000Z

456

Shale beneficiation and oil recovery from the concentrate  

SciTech Connect

A flow sheet and economic feasibility study of oil shale beneficiation and recovery shows that conceivable improvements in grinding, separation, and recovery could make a beneficiationbased system more attractive than conventional ore retorting, although current technology (based on ball milling, froth flotation, and retorting) is less attractive.

Weiss, M.A.; Klumpar, I.V.

1984-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

457

Recovery Act State Summaries | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recovery Act State Summaries Recovery Act State Summaries Recovery Act State Summaries Alabama Recovery Act State Memo Alaska Recovery Act State Memo American Samoa Recovery Act State Memo Arizona Recovery Act State Memo Arkansas Recovery Act State Memo California Recovery Act State Memo Colorado Recovery Act State Memo Connecticut Recovery Act State Memo Delaware Recovery Act State Memo District of Columbia Recovery Act State Memo Florida Recovery Act State Memo Georgia Recovery Act State Memo Guam Recovery Act State Memo Hawaii Recovery Act State Memo Idaho Recovery Act State Memo Illinois Recovery Act State Memo Indiana Recovery Act State Memo Iowa Recovery Act State Memo Kansas Recovery Act State Memo Kentucky Recovery Act State Memo Louisiana Recovery Act State Memo Maine Recovery Act State Memo

458

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31, 2010 31, 2010 CX-001453: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Central Texas Alternative Fuel and Advanced Technology Investments CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/31/2010 Location(s): Fort Worth, Texas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 31, 2010 CX-001452: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Advanced Reservoir Characterization Techniques Date: 03/31/2010 Location(s): Grand Forks, North Dakota Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 30, 2010 CX-001462: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Performance Buildings - United Teen Equality Center CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B1.24, B2.5, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 03/30/2010 Location(s): Lowell, Massachusetts Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

459

NETL: Oil & Natural Gas Technologies Reference Shelf - Presentation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy System Dynamics Geological & Env. Systems Materials Science Contacts TECHNOLOGIES Oil & Natural Gas Supply Deepwater Technology Enhanced Oil Recovery Gas Hydrates Natural...

460

NETL: Oil & Natural Gas Technologies Reference Shelf - Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy System Dynamics Geological & Env. Systems Materials Science Contacts TECHNOLOGIES Oil & Natural Gas Supply Deepwater Technology Enhanced Oil Recovery Gas Hydrates Natural...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "recovery technology cxs" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

NETL: Oil & Natural Gas Technologies Reference Shelf - Presentation...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

System Dynamics Geological & Env. Systems Materials Science Contacts TECHNOLOGIES Oil & Natural Gas Supply Deepwater Technology Enhanced Oil Recovery Gas Hydrates Natural Gas...

462

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office March 2, 2010 CX-001015: Categorical Exclusion Determination Integrated Direct Current (dc)-dc Conversion for Energy-Efficiency Multicore Microprocessors CX(s) Applied: A9,...

463

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy, Golden Field Office March 21, 2010 CX-001394: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sacramento Municipal Utility District Photovoltaic and Smart Grid Pilot at Anatolia CX(s)...

464

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Premium Power Distributed Energy Storage System Demonstration for National Grid and Sacramento Municipal Utility District CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 06182010 Location(s):...

465

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy July 12, 2010 CX-003008: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency Street Light Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07122010 Location(s): Chelsea,...

466

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Renewable Energy April 26, 2010 CX-001813: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lean Gasoline System Development for Fuel Efficient Small Cars (Milford) CX(s) Applied:...

467

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exclusion Determination Goochland Womens Correctional Facility - Replacing Coal Boiler with Liquefied Petroleum Gas Boiler CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 07132011...

468

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Determination F Area Hazardous Waste Management Facility Silver Chloride Solution Injection Wells CX(s) Applied: B6.2 Date: 06152009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina...

469

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of Regenerators for Active Magnetic Regenerative Refrigeration (AMRR) Systems CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08262010...

470

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 14, 2010 CX-004716: Categorical Exclusion Determination Developing Railway Markets for Montana Biodiesel CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12142010 Location(s): Havre,...

471

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: American Recovery and Reinvestme...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Planning and Priorities CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 04222010 Location(s): Denver, Colorado Office(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy...