Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

DOE Records Disposition Schedule Changes | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Records Disposition Schedule Changes DOE Records Disposition Schedule Changes Disposition Schedule Changes DOE Records Disposition Schedule Changes More Documents & Publications...

2

PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING RECORDS INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULES...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING RECORDS INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULES (RIDS) PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING RECORDS INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULES (RIDS) This document lists the...

3

Disposition Schedules | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Disposition Schedules Disposition Schedules The DOE Records Disposition Schedules provide the authority for the transfer, or disposal of records created and maintained by the...

4

Microsoft Word - DOE Records Disposition Schedule Changes3.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Changes-to-Schedules REV 3 DOE Administrative Records Schedules Changes Last revised: 12/14/2009 Date DOE Admin Schedule Item(s) Change Authorizing Document 3/02/07 1 10b, 24, 27, 42a-c Added items for Form I-9 (GRS 1, Item 10b), reasonable accommodation records (GRS 1, Item 24), alternative dispute resolution records (GRS 1, item 27), and alternative worksite records (GRS 1, Item 42). Added item numbers for N1 citations. GRS Transmittal No. 11, 12/31/03; GRS Transmittal No. 12, 7/14/04; GRS 1 Item 42 6/14/07 1 11 Second sentence in NOTE deleted. 6/14/07 1 12 Moved the NOTE for 12a to the series title. GRS 1, item 12 6/14/07 1 21 Inserted the "see note" and the disposition authority for the series title. N1-343-98-4, item 21 and GRS

5

Topic Index to the DOE Administrative Records Disposition Schedules  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5/21/07 TOPICINDEXTODOEADMINSCHEDULES 5/21/07 TOPICINDEXTODOEADMINSCHEDULES Topic Index to the DOE Administrative Records Disposition Schedules (excluding the GRS Schedules) Topic Schedule Item [A] [B] [C] [D] [E] [F] [G] [H] [I] [J] [K] [L] [M] [N] [O] [P] [Q] [R] [S] [T] [U] [V] [W] [X] [Y] [Z] A Academic/Outreach Program 1 44 Access Request Files 18 6 Accountable Officers' Files 6 1 Accounting Administrative Files 6 5 Administrative Claims Files 6 10 Administrative Training Records 1 29.2 Administrative Issuances 16 1 Administrative - All Other copies of Administrative Issuances 16 1.6 Administrative Grievance, Disciplinary, and Adverse Action Files 1 30 Americans with Disabilities Act 1 42 Apprenticeship Program Files 1 45 Architectural Models 17 7

6

DOERS Records Schedule Cross Index to DOE Administrative Records...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOERS Records Schedule Cross Index to DOE Administrative Records Disposition Schedules DOERS Records Schedule Cross Index to DOE Administrative Records Disposition Schedules...

7

Records Disposition  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To assign responsibilities and authorities and to prescribe policies, procedures, standards, and guidelines for the orderly disposition of records of the Department of Energy (DOE) and its management and operating contractors. Cancels DOE O 1324.2 dated 5-28-80. Chg 1 dated 4-9-92. Canceled by DOE O 1324.2B dated 1-12-95.

1988-09-13T23:59:59.000Z

8

Records Disposition  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To assign responsibilities and authorities and to prescribe policies, procedures, standards, and guidelines for the orderly disposition of records of the Department of Energy (DOE) and its operating and onsite service contractors. Cancels DOE O 1324.1 dated 7-10-78. Chg 1 dated 7-2-81. Chg 2 dated 11-9-82. Canceled by DOE O 1324.2A dated 9-13-88.

1980-05-28T23:59:59.000Z

9

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 20: ELECTRONIC RECORDS | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

20: ELECTRONIC RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 20: ELECTRONIC RECORDS This schedule authorizes the disposition of specified electronic records and hard-copy or microform...

10

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 20: ELECTRONIC RECORDS | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

0: ELECTRONIC RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 20: ELECTRONIC RECORDS This schedule authorizes the disposition of specified electronic records and hard-copy or microform...

11

Request For Records Disposition Authority | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Records Schedule Contractor Checks Request For Records Disposition Authority More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-4001-2000 DOE Records Disposition Schedule Changes Audit Letter...

12

DOE RECORDS SCHEDULE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS | Department of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE RECORDS SCHEDULE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS DOE RECORDS SCHEDULE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS This schedule provides for the disposition of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) records...

13

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 20:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20: 20: ELECTRONIC RECORDS April 2008 Revision 2 This schedule authorizes the disposition of specified electronic records and hard-copy or microform records and are integrally related to them. The electronic records may either be created or received. Included are records created by computer operators, programmers, analysts, systems administrators, and all personnel with access to a computer. Disposition authority is provided for certain master files, including some tables that are components of data base management systems, and certain files created from master files for specific purposes. In addition, this schedule covers certain disposable electronic records produced by end users in office automation applications. These disposition authorities apply to the

14

Request For Records Disposition | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Request For Records Disposition Request For Records Disposition Southeastern Power Administration (SEPA) Request For Records Disposition More Documents & Publications Audit...

15

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES This...

16

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21: AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS June 2007 Revision 1 This schedule covers audiovisual and related records created by or for Department and those acquired in the normal course of business. For audiovisual records that are not described in this schedule, an SF 115, Request for Records Disposition Authority, must be submitted to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Audiovisual records include still and motion picture photography, graphic materials, and sound and video recordings. Related documentation includes (1) production files or other files documenting the creation, justification, ownership, and rights to the records and (2) finding aids used to identify or access the records. This schedule does not cover: (1) cartographic records, (2) remote sensing imagery

17

Request For Records Disposition | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Request For Records Disposition Request For Records Disposition Spent Nuclear Fuels Request For Records Disposition More Documents & Publications The Report To The President And...

18

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 16:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 16: ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT RECORDS June 2007 Revision 1 This schedule covers those administrative management activities not covered by other Administrative Schedules. Included are disposable records created in the course of organizational planning, development, and simplification of procedures; records management activities; and administration of management improvement programs. See ADM 1 (items 12 and 13) for the disposition of case files on individuals involved in incentive award and similar types of management improvement programs. The organizational locations and titles of administrative management units vary. They may be scattered at numerous levels or locations, or may be centralized. For the purposes

19

Administrative Records Schedule: Communication Records | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Administrative Records Schedule: Communication Records Administrative Records Schedule: Communication Records The principal records documenting communication function...

20

EIA Records Schedule 0011.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

RECORD SCHEDULE N1-434-94-001 RECORD SCHEDULE N1-434-94-001 EIA Records Schedule N1-434-94-001 Approved by NARA April 3, 1995 (Some surveys are no longer in use. Read notes at bottom of last page) ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION OF RECORDS AUTHORIZED DISPOSITION Item 1) COAL DISTRIBUTION DATA, 1980-1988. This file contains data on the distribution of U.S. coal by coal-producing district of origin, consumer end-use category, state of destination and method of transportation; also included is export shipment information. This is a closed series. Disposition: PERMANENT. Transfer a copy of the data files and documentation to the National Archives upon approval of this schedule by the Archivist of the United States Item 2) HISTORICAL PLANT COST AND ANNUAL PRODUCTION EXPENSE DATA, 1979-1991.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Request for Records Disposition Authority REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY More Documents & Publications Request For Records Disposition Authority Request For Records...

22

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LEAVE BLANK (NARA use only) LEAVE BLANK (NARA use only) JOB NUMBER To: NATIONAL ARCHIVES & RECORDS ADMINISTRATION 8601 ADELPHI ROAD, COLLEGE PARK, MD 20740-6001 Date Received 1. FROM (Agency or establishment) NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C 3303a, the disposition request, including amendments is approved except for items that may be marked "disposition not approved" or "withdrawn" in column 10. 2. MAJOR SUB DIVISION 3. MINOR SUBDIVISION 4. NAME OF PERSON WITH WHOM TO CONFER 5. TELEPHONE DATE ARCHIVIST OF THE UNITED STATES 6. AGENCY CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposition of its records and that the records proposed for disposal on the attached______page(s) are not needed now for the business of this agency or will not be

23

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

RS-Weapons X-Rays REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY More Documents & Publications REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY...

24

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DISPOSITION AUTHORITY More Documents & Publications REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY Request For Records Disposition Autnority Records Dispostion-Coal Distribution Data...

25

Request For Records Disposition Authority | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Request For Records Disposition Authority Request For Records Disposition Authority National Archives Pacific Southwest Region Request For Records Disposition Authority More...

26

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 14: INFORMATIONAL SERVICES RECORDS...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4: INFORMATIONAL SERVICES RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 14: INFORMATIONAL SERVICES RECORDS This schedule covers certain records pertaining to informational services...

27

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1nstrlrcrlons on reverts) 1nstrlrcrlons on reverts) ' 0 NATIONAL ARCMVES and RECORDS AD~~INISTRAT~ON (NIR) WASHINGTON, DC 20408 1. FROM (Agency or estabi~shment) Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 . '2. MAJOR SUBDIVISION fn lccordance w i l h the provirions o f 4 4 DOE~NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE U.S.C. 3 3 0 3 r the disposition r e q u c ~ t , including rmtndments, i s approvtd n c t p l 3. MINOR SUBOlVlStON lor ilemr that mky be mrrkcd 'dir wition not approved' o r withdmwn' in c&mn lo. '4. NAME O F PERSON WITH WHOM TO CONFER 5. TELEPHONE Mary Ann Wallace -301 903 4353 6. AGENCY CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am authorized to a d for this to th#disposit-ion of its records and that the records roposed for disposal on the P now needed for the business of this agency or wil not be needed after the concurrence f

28

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

m m - REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY (See Instructions on reverse) GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION N A T I O N A L ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, DC 20408 1. F R O M ( A g e n c y o r e s t a b l i s h m e n t ) jepartment of Energy 2. MAJOR S U B D I V I S I O N Oak Ridse Operations Office 3. M I N O R S U B D I V I S I O N 4 . N A M E O F PERSON W I T H W H O M T O C O N F E R ( 5 . T E L E P H O N E E X T . L E A V E B L A N K - JOB N O . d/-d33P PO- ZJ - - - - p p D A T E R E C E I V E D p - NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a the disposal request, including amendments, is approved except for items that may be marked "disposition not approved" or "withdrawn" in column 10. If no records are proposed for disposal, the signature of the Archivist is not required. - DATE ARCHIVIST

29

DOE Administrative Records Schedules Changes | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Administrative Records Schedules Changes DOE Administrative Records Schedules Changes Changes posted to Administrative Records Schedules DOE Administrative Records Schedules...

30

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21: AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21: AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS This schedule covers audiovisual and related records created by or for Department and those acquired in...

31

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) This schedule covers audiovisual and related records created by or for...

32

Request For Records Disposition Authority | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fossil Energy Equity Re-determination Records Request For Records Disposition Authority More Documents & Publications REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY Inspection Report:...

33

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES June 2007 Revision 1 This schedule provides for the disposal of certain records common to most offices. It covers administrative subject files; facilitative records such as suspense files, tracking and control records, calendars, and indexes; and documents of transitory value. This schedule does not apply to any materials determined to be non-record or to materials such as calendars or work schedules claimed as personal. Office Administrative Files described under item 1 are records retained by an originating office as its record of initiation of an action, request, or response to requests for information. This item may be applied only to separate administrative files containing such records as copies of

34

I REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY LEAVE BL ...A (NARA use only1 JOB NUMBER TO: NATIONAL ARCHIVES & RECORDS ADMINISTRATION In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a, the Office of the Chief Information Officer disposition request, including amendments, is approved except for items that may be marked "disposition not approved" or "withdrawn" in column 10. Records Management Division N1-434-02-2 Date received 860 1 ADELPHI ROAD COLLEGE PARK, MD 20740-600 1 1. FROM (Agency or establishment) Department of Energy , ( / I 4 30 -A&&& NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY 6. AGENCY CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposition of its records and that the

35

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Instructions on reverse) Instructions on reverse) LEAVE BLANK - GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, DC 20408 I . F R O M (Agency or ertabluhmentJ D A T E RECEIVED NOTIF~CATION TO AGENCY Department of Energy 2. MAJ0.R S U B D I V I S I O N I 4 . N A M E O F PERSON W I T H W H O M T O CONFER 15. TELEPHONE E X T . \OATS l A R C H l V l S T O F T H E U N I T E D STATES In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303 the dispoal request. including amendmentr, is approved . 3. M I N O R S U B D I V I S I O N except for items that may be marked "disposition not approved" or "withdrawn" in column 10. If no records are proposed for disposal, the signature of the Archivist is not required. I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposal of the agency's records;

36

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 11:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 11: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 11: SPACE AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS June 2007 Revision 1 This schedule provides for the disposal of all copies, wherever located in the Department, of records relating to space and maintenance, except as indicated below. Records documenting these functions pertain to the acquisition, allocation, utilization, and release of space and include related correspondence and reports submitted to the General Services Administration (or equivalent agency with similar Government-wide responsibilities) as directed by law and regulation (41 CFR 101-17); correspondence and forms relating to the compilation of directory service listings; identification credentials and related accountable records; requests for building and equipment services;

37

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Pacific Northwest Lab: Richland Operations Office REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY More Documents & Publications REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY Request For...

38

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 22:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 22: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 22: AUDIT/INVESTIGATIVE RECORDS June 2007 Revision 1 Section I of this schedule covers records associated with investigations other than those performed by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Types of investigations may include: routine and significant internal program investigations, specific purpose investigations, audits, inspections, appraisals, and management reviews. Investigations may be described or referred to as audits, appraisals, surveillance, self-assessments, management assessments, or evaluations. Investigations may be conducted by DOE or by its contractors. Section II covers records created by the Department's OIG investigations. OIG investigations serve to prevent or reduce waste and fraud in Departmental programs,

39

EIA RECORDS SCHEDULE (EIARS) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIA RECORDS SCHEDULE (EIARS) EIA RECORDS SCHEDULE (EIARS) EIA RECORDS SCHEDULE (EIARS) The establishment of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) as an independent statistical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy in 1977 was a result of enabling legislation that charged the EIA to maintain a comprehensive data and information program relevant to energy resources and reserves, energy production, energy demand, energy technologies, and related financial and statistical information relevant to the adequacy of energy resources to meet the Nations demands in the near and longer term future EIA RECORDS SCHEDULE (EIARS) More Documents & Publications Request For Records Disposition ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 17: CARTOGRAPHIC, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC, ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, AND FACILITY MANAGEMENT RECORDS

40

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 6: ACCOUNTABLE OFFICERS' ACCOUNTS...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 6: ACCOUNTABLE OFFICERS' ACCOUNTS RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 6: ACCOUNTABLE OFFICERS' ACCOUNTS RECORDS This schedule covers accountable...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

GENERAL RECORDS SCHEDULE 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

39 39 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ADMIN1STRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 1: PERSONNEL RECORDS June 2007 Revision 2 As do all Administrative Records Schedules (ADMs), ADM-1 covers records of the Department and its contractors. The records include, employee concerns programs, labor agreements and negotiations, labor relations, academic and outreach programs, apprenticeship programs, job vacancies, unemployment compensation, recruitment and employee health. The most important types of records are the Official Personnel Folders, the Service Record Cards, and the Employee Medical Folders. Those for Federal employees are maintained according to The Guide to Personnel Recordkeeping, an Office of Personnel Management directive that prescribes a system of recordkeeping for Federal

42

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 4: PROPERTY DISPOSAL RECORDS...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4: PROPERTY DISPOSAL RECORDS (Revision 2) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 4: PROPERTY DISPOSAL RECORDS (Revision 2) These records pertain to the sales by agencies of real and...

43

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 14:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 14: INFORMATIONAL SERVICES RECORDS June 2007 Revision 1 This schedule covers certain records pertaining to informational services performed by the Department in their day-to-day affairs and in their relations with the public, including records created in administering Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act ) programs. Except as otherwise specified in individual items, it applies to copies of these records wherever located. Item 4 applies only to files maintained in office responsible for the operation of the information activities. Items 11 through 15 describe the files accumulated in carrying out the provisions of the FOIA, and items 21 through 26 describe the files created in administering the provisions of the Privacy Act. Items 31

44

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

U. S. Atomic Energy Commision REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY More Documents & Publications REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY DOE-HDBK-1109-97 DOE-HDBK-1109-97...

45

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

instructions on reverse) instructions on reverse) L E A V E B L A N K JOB NO. #/-Y3Y-ff-L GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, DC 20408 1. f R O M (Agency orertabluhment) lepartment of Energy 2. M N O R SUBDIVISION 3. M I N O R SUBDIVISION - . ,#q/FEF 4. NAME OF P ~ R S O N WITH WHOM TO CONFER 15. TELEPHONE EXT. 1 hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposal of the agency's records; that the records proposed for disposal in this Request of page(s) are not now needed for the business of this .agency or will not be needed after the retention periods specified; and that written concurrence from the General Accounting Office, if required under the prov~sions of Title 8 of the GAO Manual for Guidance of Federal Agenctes, is

46

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

~nstructions on reverse) ~nstructions on reverse) G E N E R A L SERVICES A D M I N I S T R A T I O N N A T I O N A L ARCHIVES A N D RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, D C 20408 1. F R O M (Agency or ertablishment) L E A V E B L A N K JOB NO. di-%3%-fF / C D A T E R E C E I V E D flzg)~? NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY n t n f F n e r a v - Sari Francisco Operations Office . 3. M I N O R S U B D I V I S I O N b ~ s ~ ~ 5 ? % 5 2 5 Lawrence Berkel ey Laboratory 4. N A M E O F PERSON W I T H W H O M T O CONFER IS. TELEPHONE EXT. I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposal of the agency's records; that the records proposed for disposal in this Request of 1 page(s) are not now needed for the business of this agency or will not be needed after the retention periods specified; and that written concurrence from the General Accounting Office, if required under the provisions of Title 8 of the GAO Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, is

47

Records Schedule-UMTRA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WEQh!?ST FOP. RECOhD WEQh!?ST FOP. RECOhD ' 3ISPOSITIQN AClT H O R l N - - . (See Insrru~t,ons on reverse) 'c NATIOKAL ARCMVES and RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (MR) WASHINGTON, DC 20408 I . FROM ( A g e n c y or e s t a b l ~ s h m e n t ) , U. S . Denar-merit o f Enercy 2. MAJOR SU8OlVlSiON i 51 bu~uerque $net a t i i o n s O f ?ice (kL9 j 3. MINOR SUBDIVISION Urani urn !disposition of its records and that the records roposed for disposal on the attached L , page s) are not now needed for the bus~ness of this agency or wil f not be needed after the retention enodss eci A ed; and that written concurrence from the General Accounting Office, under the pmvisions o

48

Request For Records Disposition Authority-Nuclear Weapons | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

For Records Disposition Authority-Nuclear Weapons This document identifies the nuclear weapon records generated by the Department of Energy's (DOE) Nuclear Weapons Complex Request...

49

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Power Plant Docket Records REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY More Documents & Publications PIA - Savannah River Remediation Accreditation Boundary (SRR AB) REQUEST...

50

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 9: TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9: TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 9: TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION RECORDS This schedule covers records documenting the movement of goods and persons...

51

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 9: TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

9: TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION RECORDS (Revision 2) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 9: TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION RECORDS (Revision 2) This schedule covers records documenting the...

52

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY S  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

S S e e Instructions o n reverse) NATIONAL ARCHIVES and RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NIR) WASHINGTON. DC 20408 , - - 1. FROM (Agency or establishment) Department of Energy 2. MAJOR SUBDIVISION Assistant Secretary For Fossil Energy (FE-1) I 3. MINOR SUBDIVISION Office of Naval Petroleum and Shale Oil 4 . NAME OF PERSON WITH WHOM TO CON I 1 Jerry Hinkle (FE 47) 1(202)586-43 80 I I / 6. AGENCY CERTIFICATION I NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY i I In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a the disposition request, including amendments, is ap roved except for items that may be marke! "dis osition not approved" or "withdrawn" in c o L n 10. I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in yatters pertaining to of its records and that the records roposed for disposal on the attached

53

Request For Records Disposition Authority: Strategic Petroleum Reserve  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Request For Records Disposition Authority: Strategic Petroleum Request For Records Disposition Authority: Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office Request For Records Disposition Authority: Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office Paper case files pertaining to environmental permit applications, permits and related correspondence as well as NEPA correspondence within of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office (SPRPMO) Request For Records Disposition Authority: Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office More Documents & Publications 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, RMOTC, and Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office CX-002673: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-009794: Categorical Exclusion Determination

54

Request For Records Disposition Autnority | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Autnority Request For Records Disposition Autnority Published Posters. Posters depicting Department of Energy facilities, research projects, security awareness themes, and related...

55

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES (Revision 2) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES (Revision 2) This schedule provides for the disposal of certain...

56

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 11: SPACE AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1: SPACE AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 11: SPACE AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS This schedule provides for the disposal of all copies, wherever located in the...

57

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

23: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES This schedule covers those administrative management activities not covered by...

58

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 5: BUDGET PREPARATION, PRESENTATION...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5: BUDGET PREPARATION, PRESENTATION, AND APPORTIONMENT RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 5: BUDGET PREPARATION, PRESENTATION, AND APPORTIONMENT RECORDS Budget and...

59

Archives and History Office: Records Schedules  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Services > Records Schedules Services > Records Schedules Records Schedules Note: Some links on this page open pdf files, which require the free Acrobat Reader. SLAC Current Organizational Unit File Plans / Records Control Schedules For assistance in applying or developing a records schedule for your unit, please contact either the SLAC Archives and History Office (x3091 -- directorate and research records) or the SLAC Records Manager (x4342 -- business and safety records). Directorate Organizational Unit Applicable File Plans(s) / Records Control Schedule(s) Director's Office SLAC DO Schedule Advisor for Science and Technology DOE Administrative Records schedules and DOE R&D Schedule Chief Research Officer DOE Administrative Records schedules and DOE R&D Schedule Communications Office DOE Administrative Records schedules (particularly ADM14 and ADM21)

60

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 17: CARTOGRAPHIC, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

CARTOGRAPHIC, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC, ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, AND FACILITY MANAGEMENT RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 17: CARTOGRAPHIC, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC, ARCHITECTURAL,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 5: BUDGET PREPARATION, PRESENTATION...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5: BUDGET PREPARATION, PRESENTATION, AND APPORTIONMENT ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 5: BUDGET PREPARATION, PRESENTATION, AND APPORTIONMENT Budget and apportionment records...

62

Records Schedule Contractor Checks  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DlSPOSlTlON AWTHORlW I REQUEST FOR RECORDS DlSPOSlTlON AWTHORlW I ' O B N ~ U R ~ ~ ( 5 0 s I n s rrucrigns on r e v r r r m ) , .- , ' 1 0 NATIOXAL ARCHIVES and RECORDS ADMWIS?IWTION WR) lp"TE ~~~~k~ f . WASHINGTON. l X 20408 21- , f - $+$ [ r . F R O M (Agenc y o r w t l a b l ~ g h m ~ n l ) - Washington, DC 20585 Department of Energy -- -2, M ~ O R S U B D ~ V I S ~ O N . ' 3 MINOR SL)BDWISION 6 AGENCY CERTIFICATION I hereby ccnity that I am authorized to act for thir and that the rrcords roposed for dfsposal on of thir agency or vilrnor be needed after the the General Accounting Office, under the provisions Q Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, is nor required; a is attached; or hhu been rrqucrtcd. m u . Team Leader, Recards Mgt. '4, NAME OF P E R S O N wIm WHOM To CONFER .5. E L W H O N L A Mary AM Wallace . --..-*- -

63

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 17: CARTOGRAPHIC, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

activities. Many of these records have continuing historical value after they are no longer of use to the Department. This records schedule covers only disposable records...

64

Audit/Investigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Investigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) AuditInvestigative Records Schedule (Revision 2) This schedule covers records associated with investigations other than those performed...

65

Administrative Records Schedules | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Administrative Records Schedules Administrative Records Schedules Administrative Records Schedules Administrative Records Schedules NOTE: Most of the files below are in PDF, you will need Acrobat® Reader(tm) to view these files. SCHEDULE TITLE DATE LAST CHANGED AUTHORIZATION NUMBER 1 Personnel Records (pdf) 09/15/10 N1-434-98-4 2 Payroll & Pay Administration Records (pdf) 09/15/10 N1-434-98-5 3 Procurement, Supply, and Grant Records (pdf) 09/15/10 N1-434-98-6 N1-434-95-1 4 Property Disposal Records (pdf) 12/10/10 --- 5 Budget Preparation, Presentation and Apportionment Records (pdf) 12/10/10 N1-434-98-8 6 Accountable Officers' Accounts Records (pdf) 09/15/10 N1-434-98-9 7 Expenditure Accounting Records --- GRS 7 8 Stores, Plants and Cost Accounting Records --- GRS 8

66

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 12: COMMUNICATIONS RECORDS |...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

records documenting communication functions include messenger service data; telecommunications service control and operational records; long distance telephone reports; postal...

67

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 2: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 2: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION RECORDS Payrolling and pay administration records pertain to the...

68

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 2: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION RECORDS-Revision 2 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 2: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION RECORDS-Revision 2 Payrolling and pay administration records...

69

Site Specific Records Schedules | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Site Specific Records Schedules Site Specific Records Schedules Site Specific Records Schedules NOTE: Most of the files below are in PDF, you will need Acrobat® Reader(tm) to view these files. TITLE DATE LAST CHANGED AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AEC -- Administrative Record (pdf) 01/15/01 II-NNA-6754 AEC -- Nuclear Power Plant Docket Records (pdf) 01/15/01 NC-174-231 AEC -- Power Reactor Records (pdf) 01/15/01 II-NNA-2110 Alaska Power Administration (pdf) 02/09/01 N1-447-97-1 Appointee Clearance and Vetting Files (pdf) 09/10/02 N1-434-96-3 Bettis Atomic Laboratory Naval Reactors (pdf) 09/09/91 N1-434-91-8 Bonneville Power Administration (pdf) 08/06/07 N1-305-07-1 Cyclotron Records, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (pdf) 12/22/88 N1-434-89-7 Energy Information Administration (EIARS) (pdf) 10/21/03 N1-434-96-2

70

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 3: PROCUREMENT, SUPPLY, AND GRANT...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: PROCUREMENT, SUPPLY, AND GRANT RECORDS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 3: PROCUREMENT, SUPPLY, AND GRANT RECORDS The basic procurement files reflect a considerable range of...

71

Records Schedule-Alaska Power Authority  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-109 PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE STANDARD FORM SF 1 15 (REV 3-91) -109 PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE STANDARD FORM SF 1 15 (REV 3-91) Prescr~bed by NARA 36 CFR 1228 REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY To NATIONAL ARCIIIVES and RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NIR) WASHINGTON, DC 20408 1 FROM (Agency or establ~shment) Department o f Energy 2 MAJOR SUBDIVISION Alaska Power Administration 3 MINOR SUBDIVISION 4 NAME OF PERSON WITH WHOM TO CONFER Carol Holmberg JOB NUMBER N1-447-97- 1 DATE RECEIVED .'I+ 46 NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY In accordance ~ 7 t h thc prov~sions of 44 U S C 3303a, the d~spos~tion request, including amendments, is approved except for items that may be marked "dlspos~tion not approved or "withdrawn" In column 10 5 TELEPHONE (907)586-7405 DATE 1 t,- -'?x 6 AGENCY CERTIFICATION I hearby certify that I am author~zed to act for thls agency in matters pertalnlng to the dlpsositi

72

Plan and schedule for disposition and regulatory compliance for miscellaneous streams. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On December 23, 1991, the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL) and the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) agreed to adhere to the provisions of Department of Ecology Consent Order No. DE 91NM-177 (Consent Order). The Consent Order lists regulatory milestones for liquid effluent streams at the Hanford Site to comply with the permitting requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-216 (State Waste Discharge Permit Program) or WAC 173-218 (Washington Underground Injection Control Program) where applicable. Hanford Site liquid effluent streams discharging to the soil column have been categorized in the Consent Order as follows: Phase I Streams Phase II Streams Miscellaneous Streams. Phase I and Phase II Streams are addressed in two RL reports: {open_quotes}Plan and Schedule to Discontinue Disposal of Contaminated Liquids into the Soil Column at the Hanford Site{close_quotes} (DOE-RL 1987), and {open_quotes}Annual Status of the Report of the Plan and Schedule to Discontinue Disposal of Contaminated Liquids into the Soil Column at the Hanford Site{close_quotes}. Miscellaneous Streams are those liquid effluent streams discharged to the ground that are not categorized as Phase I or Phase II Streams. Miscellaneous Streams discharging to the soil column at the Hanford Site are subject to the requirements of several milestones identified in the Consent Order. This document provides a plan and schedule for the disposition of Miscellaneous Streams. The disposition process for the Miscellaneous Streams is facilitated using a decision tree format. The decision tree and corresponding analysis for determining appropriate disposition of these streams is presented in this document.

NONE

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RECORDS SCHEDULE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

13 13 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RECORDS SCHEDULE N1-434-96-9, N1-434-07-01, and N1-434-08-02 Revision 2 June 2008 Scope. This schedule encompasses research and development (R&D) records generated within the Department of Energy (DOE) complex, which consists of all DOE offices and its contractor organizations, such as the National Laboratories. It applies to all applicable records regardless of media or format, including paper, audio and visual, and electronic records. Excluded from this schedule are R&D records pertaining to (a) nuclear weapons, which are covered by DOE Nuclear Weapons Schedule (NI-434-96-5 and N1-434-98- 27), and (b) Work for Others, Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA), and cost sharing agreements, which are covered by DOE Schedule N1-434-

74

Programmatic Records Schedules | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Research and Development Agreements (CRADAS) and Cost-Sharing Agreements, Technology Transfer Conflict of Interest Records, Electronic Records 80101 N1-434-87-1,...

75

Administrative Records Schedule 1 | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

labor relations, academic and outreach programs, apprenticeship programs, job vacancies, unemployment compensation, recruitment and employee health Administrative Records...

76

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 18: SECURITY, EMERGENCY PLANNING...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

records include the various files created by the Department to control and protect safeguards and security interests (e.g., classified information, sensitive unclassified...

77

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 1: PERSONNEL RECORDS (Revision 3)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The records include, employee concerns programs, labor agreements and negotiations, labor relations, academic and outreach programs, apprenticeship programs, job vacancies, unemployment...

78

May Also Be Used U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORIZATION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 (06-93) 05-90 Edition May Also Be Used U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORIZATION OMB Control No. 1910-1700 OMB Burden Disclosure Statement on Back 1. Control Number 2a. Organizational Unit and Routing Symbol 2b. Departmental Organization Contractor Organization 3a. Volume On Hand (Cu. Ft.) 3b. Volume Accumulated Annually (Estimate Cu. Ft.) 4. Record Dates (From/To) 5. Identification of Filing Unit (Include type of record, function performed, security classification (or other restrictions), and other descriptive facts) 6. Appraisal (Include justification for retention period. Indicate relationship of filing unit to any other related filing unit in the same or other organizations. Also, indicate retention period in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), if subsequent transfer to National Archives

79

Record of decision for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons- Usable  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14 14 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 13 / Tuesday, January 21, 1997 / Notices Responses: 18,620 Burden Hours: 64,310. Abstract: The LESCP is being conducted in response to the legislative requirement in P.L. 103-382, Section 1501 to assess the implementation of Title I and related education reforms. The information will be used to examine changes-over a 3-year period-that are occurring in schools and classrooms. Teachers and teacher aides will complete a mail survey, and district Title I administrators, principals, school-based staff, and parents will be interviewed during on- site field work. [FR Doc. 97-1307 Filed 1-17-97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Record of decision for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Final Programmatic

80

DOE/EIS-0283-SA1: Supplement Analysis and Amended Record of Decision for Changes Needed To the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program (4/24/03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-SA1 3-SA1 April 2003 Changes Needed To The Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS AND AMENDED RECORD OF DECISION U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Fissile Materials Disposition Washington, D.C. Table of Contents i Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. ii List of Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Amended Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0287) (11/28/06)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

811 Federal Register 811 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 28, 2006 / Notices Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339. [FR Doc. E6-20124 Filed 11-27-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Amended Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Amended Record of Decision. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its Record of Decision (ROD) published December 19, 2005 (70 Federal Register [FR] 75165), pursuant to the Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) (DOE/EIS-0287, September 2002). The Final EIS analyzed two sets of alternatives for accomplishing DOE's

82

Record of Decision for the Disposition of Surplus Highly Envirched Uranium Final Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

19 19 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 151 / Monday, August 5, 1996 / Notices contact: Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance (EH-42), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, Telephone: 202-586-4600 or leave a message at 800-472-2756. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 17, 1996, the Department published a notice in the Federal Register (61 FR 37247) announcing its intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for interim storage of plutonium at the RFETS and the commencement of a public scoping period that was to continue until August 16, 1996. The July 17, 1996, notice also announced a public scoping meeting scheduled for August 6, 1996. In response to a stakeholder's request, the Department is rescheduling the public scoping meeting

83

REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY L E A V E B L A N  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

L L E A V E B L A N K (See lnsrrucrions on reverse) N1-434-90-7 L F%@Wft*We%V1l&TPnEnergy I NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY G E N E R A L SERVICES A D M I N I S T R A T I O N N A T I O N A L ARCHIVES A N D RECORDS SERVICE. WASHINGTON, D C 20408 D A T E R E C E I V E D 7 - 2 5 9 0 6. C E R T I F I C A T E O F A G E N C Y R E P R E S E N T A T I V E / & ? / a v~d;;it-\ '. MWiI)CS%Pr(tjP%perati~n~ Off ice . 3. M l N Q R S U B D I V I S I O N 4. N A M E O F PERSON W I T H W H O M T O C O N F E R 15. T E L E P H O N E E X T . I hereby c e r t i f y t h a t I a m authorized t o a c t f o r t h i s agency in matters pertaining t o t h e disposal o f t h e agency's records; t h a t t h e records proposed f o r disposal i n this Request o f page(s) are n o t n o w needed f o r t h e business o f t h i s agency or w i l l n o t be needed after t h e r e t e n t i o n periods specified; and t h a t w r i t t e n concurrence f r o m t h e General A c c o u

84

Schedules  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Schedules Schedules Schedules Print Current Long-Term Operating Schedule August-December 2013 Upcoming Long-Term Operating Schedule January-July 2014 New! ALS Operating Schedule on Google Calendar Past Long-Term Operating Schedules January-July 2013 July-December 2012 January-June 2012 July-December 2011 January-June 2011 July-December 2010 January-June 2010 July-December 2009 January-June 2009 July-December 2008 January-June 2008 July-December 2007 February-June 2007 July 2006-February 2007 January-June 2006 July-December 2005 January-June 2005 June-December 2004 December 2003-May 2004 June 2003-November 2003 December 2002-May 2003 June 2002-November 2002 December 2001-May 2002 May 2001-December 2001 January 2001-April 2001 July 2000-December 2000 January 2000-June 2000 April 1999-December 1999

85

Year 2000 Project Records.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DISPOSITION SCHEDULE DISPOSITION SCHEDULE Year 2000 Project Records 1/22/01 Year 2000 (Y2K) Project records have been created to document the effort of the Department of Energy to ensure that its information systems are Y2K compliant, i.e., able to perform all functions and applications when encountering dates beyond December 31, 1999. The records which document the overall Departmental and Field Office efforts, including design and modification work, are considered to be technologically significant. Some warrant permanent retention. The record keeping copy of the records identified in Item 1a of the schedule will be collected and maintained for the Department at DOE/HQ. Specific computer system documentation for the creation, modification, maintenance and testing of the systems will

86

Integrated Facilities Disposition Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facilities Facilities Disposition Program Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting at ORNL Sharon Robinson Dirk Van Hoesen Robert Jubin Brad Patton July 29, 2009 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy The Integrated Facility Disposition Program (IFDP) addresses the remaining EM Scope at both ORNL and Y-12 Cost Range: $7 - $14B Schedule: 26 Years 3 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Scope of work * Treatment and disposition of legacy materials and waste * D&D 327 (1.5 M ft 2 ) excess facilities generating >2 M yd 3 debris * Soil and groundwater remedial actions generating >1 M yd 3 soils * Facilities surveillance and maintenance * Reconfiguration of waste management facilities * Ongoing waste management operations * Project management

87

Microsoft Word - Records Management Exit Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Records Management Records Management Exit Procedures For Departing Department of Energy Federal and Contractor Employees Records Management Division Office of IT Planning, Architecture, and E-Government Office of the Chief Information Officer July 2010 2 PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS The Federal Records Act requires the Department of Energy (DOE) Records Officer to remind departing Federal and contractor employees that Federal records may not be removed from Government custody nor may they be destroyed except in accordance with a records disposition schedule that has been approved by the Archivist of the United States. The creation of adequate documentation and the preservation of Federal records are required by law and regulation

88

PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS The Federal Records Act requires the Department of Energy (DOE) Records Officer to remind departing Federal and contractor employees that Federal records may not be removed from Government custody nor may they be destroyed except in accordance with a records disposition schedule that has been approved by the Archivist of the United States. The creation of adequate documentation and the preservation of Federal records are required by law and regulation (contained in 36 CFR Chapter XII). As Federal and contractor employees, you have Federal record-keeping responsibilities that are regulated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to ensure the retention and preservation of Federal records. PURPOSE The purpose of this brochure is to provide records exit procedures for

89

DISPOSITION AUTHORITIES FROZEN UNDER THE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MORATORIUM...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

authorities which are under the moratorium on the destruction of health related records as of March 2008. DISPOSITION AUTHORITIES FROZEN UNDER THE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MORATORIUM...

90

Records Management Exit Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Exit Procedures For Departing Federal and contractor Employees PRESERVATION OF FEDERAL RECORDS The Federal Records Act requires the Department of Energy (DOE) Records Officer to remind departing Federal and contractor employees that Federal records may not be removed from Government custody nor may they be destroyed except in accordance with a records disposition schedule that has been approved by the Archivist of the United States. The creation of adequate documentation and the preservation of Federal records are required by law and regulation (contained in 36 CFR Chapter XII). As Federal and contractor employees, you have Federal record-keeping responsibilities that are regulated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to ensure the retention and

91

Audiovisual Records | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Audiovisual Records Audiovisual Records ADM 210.pdf More Documents & Publications ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS...

92

Crosswalk between DOERS and Admin Schedules  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2/00 2/00 Cross-Walk -DOERS to Admin Sched rev2.wpd DOERS Records Schedule Cross Index to DOE Administrative Records Disposition Schedules DOERS Item Number Description of Records DOE Administrative or Programmatic Schedule Number / Item NARA Case Number DOERS 1, Medical, Health and Safety Records DOERS 1, Item 1a Safety Management Records DOE Admin18, Item 11.1a, NC-326-75-2 DOERS 1, item 1 (b, c, d, & e) Safety Management Records DOE Admin 18, item 11.1 (c, d, e & f) II NNA-1023(2) II NNA-310(6) II NNA-1023(3) II NNA-409(25) DOERS 1, Item 2 Fire Unit Records DOE Admin18 ,Item 11.4 (a thru g) NC-430-76-2(3) II NNA-1858(1B) II NNA-2939 II NNA-1858(1C) II NNA-1858(E) II NNA-1858(1F) DOERS 1, Item 3 Medical or Health Research Project Case Files R & D Programmatic Schedule

93

Communications Records | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Communications Records Communications Records ADM 120.pdf More Documents & Publications ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 12: COMMUNICATIONS RECORDS ADM 12 PDF Administrative...

94

Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium Disposition Program plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to provide upper level guidance for the program that will downblend surplus highly enriched uranium for use as commercial nuclear reactor fuel or low-level radioactive waste. The intent of this document is to outline the overall mission and program objectives. The document is also intended to provide a general basis for integration of disposition efforts among all applicable sites. This plan provides background information, establishes the scope of disposition activities, provides an approach to the mission and objectives, identifies programmatic assumptions, defines major roles, provides summary level schedules and milestones, and addresses budget requirements.

NONE

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

95

Administrative Management Records | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Administrative Management Records Administrative Management Records This schedule covers those administrative management activities not covered by other Administrative Schedules...

96

Disposition of uranium-233  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US is developing a strategy for the disposition of surplus weapons-usable uranium-233 ({sup 233}U). The strategy (1) identifies the requirements for the disposition of surplus {sup 233}U; (2) identifies potential disposition options, including key issues to be resolved with each option; and (3) defines a road map that identifies future key decisions and actions. The disposition of weapons-usable fissile materials is part of a US international arms-control program for reduction of the number of nuclear weapons and the quantities of nuclear-weapons-usable materials worldwide. The disposition options ultimately lead to waste forms requiring some type of geological disposal. Major options are described herein.

Tousley, D.R. [Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC (United States). Office of Fissile Materials Disposition; Forsberg, C.W.; Krichinsky, A.M. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1997-10-16T23:59:59.000Z

97

disposition | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

disposition disposition Dataset Summary Description This dataset comes from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and is part of the 2011 Annual Energy Outlook Report (AEO2011). This dataset is table 11, and contains only the reference case. The dataset uses million barrels per day. The data is broken down into crude oil, other petroleum supply, other non petroleum supply and liquid fuel consumption. Source EIA Date Released April 26th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords 2011 AEO disposition EIA liquid fuels Supply Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon AEO2011: Liquid Fuels Supply and Disposition- Reference Case (xls, 117 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Peer Reviewed Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Annually Time Period 2008-2035

98

A comparative assessment of the economics of plutonium disposition including comparison with other nuclear fuel cycles  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE has been evaluating three technologies for the disposition of approximately 50 metric tons of surplus plutonium from defense-related programs: reactors, immobilization, and deep boreholes. As part of the process supporting an early CY 1997 Record of Decision (ROD), a comprehensive assessment of technical viability, cost, and schedule has been conducted. Oak Ridge National Laboratory has managed and coordinated the life-cycle cost (LCC) assessment effort for this program. This paper discusses the economic analysis methodology and the results prior to ROD. Other objectives of the paper are to discuss major technical and economic issues that impact plutonium disposition cost and schedule. Also to compare the economics of a once-through weapons-derived MOX nuclear fuel cycle to other fuel cycles, such as those utilizing spent fuel reprocessing. To evaluate the economics of these technologies on an equitable basis, a set of cost estimating guidelines and a common cost-estimating format were utilized by all three technology teams. This paper also includes the major economic analysis assumptions and the comparative constant-dollar and discounted-dollar LCCs.

Williams, K.A.; Miller, J.W.; Reid, R.L.

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

Accountable Officers' Accounts Records | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Accountable Officers' Accounts Records Accountable Officers' Accounts Records ADM 60.pdf More Documents & Publications ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 6: ACCOUNTABLE OFFICERS'...

100

PF-4 actinide disposition strategy  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The dwindling amount of Security Category I processing and storage space across the DOE Complex has driven the need for more effective storage of nuclear materials at LANL's Plutonium Facility's (PF-4's) vault. An effort was begun in 2009 to create a strategy, a roadmap, to identify all accountable nuclear material and determine their disposition paths, the PF-4 Actinide Disposition Strategy (PADS). Approximately seventy bins of nuclear materials with similar characteristics - in terms of isotope, chemical form, impurities, disposition location, etc. - were established in a database. The ultimate disposition paths include the material to remain at LANL, disposition to other DOE sites, and disposition to waste. If all the actions described in the document were taken, over half of the containers currently in the PF-4 vault would been eliminated. The actual amount of projected vault space will depend on budget and competing mission requirements, however, clearly a significant portion of the current LANL inventory can be either dispositioned or consolidated.

Marcevicius, Robert W [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Assistant Manager for Waste Disposition  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The incumbent of this position is responsible for providing overall leadership and direction for oversight of assigned contractor and Federal programs and activities associated with the disposition...

102

Unallocated Off-Specification Highly Enriched Uranium: Recommendations for Disposition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made significant progress with regard to disposition planning for 174 metric tons (MTU) of surplus Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU). Approximately 55 MTU of this 174 MTU are ''offspec'' HEU. (''Off-spec'' signifies that the isotopic or chemical content of the material does not meet the American Society for Testing and Materials standards for commercial nuclear reactor fuel.) Approximately 33 of the 55 MTU have been allocated to off-spec commercial reactor fuel per an Interagency Agreement between DOE and the Tennessee Valley Authority (1). To determine disposition plans for the remaining {approx}22 MTU, the DOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (OFMD) and the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) co-sponsored this technical study. This paper represents a synopsis of the formal technical report (NNSA/NN-0014). The {approx} 22 MTU of off-spec HEU inventory in this study were divided into two main groupings: one grouping with plutonium (Pu) contamination and one grouping without plutonium. This study identified and evaluated 26 potential paths for the disposition of this HEU using proven decision analysis tools. This selection process resulted in recommended and alternative disposition paths for each group of HEU. The evaluation and selection of these paths considered criteria such as technical maturity, programmatic issues, cost, schedule, and environment, safety and health compliance. The primary recommendations from the analysis are comprised of 7 different disposition paths. The study recommendations will serve as a technical basis for subsequent programmatic decisions as disposition of this HEU moves into the implementation phase.

Bridges, D. N.; Boeke, S. G.; Tousley, D. R.; Bickford, W.; Goergen, C.; Williams, W.; Hassler, M.; Nelson, T.; Keck, R.; Arbital, J.

2002-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

103

Major Risk Factors Integrated Facility Disposition Project -...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Integrated Facility Disposition Project - Oak Ridge Major Risk Factors Integrated Facility Disposition Project - Oak Ridge Full Document and Summary Versions are available for...

104

EM Waste and Materials Disposition & Transportation | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

EM Waste and Materials Disposition & Transportation EM Waste and Materials Disposition & Transportation DOE's Radioactive Waste Management Priorities: Continue to manage waste...

105

HEQUEST FOR Rt43RDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- - HEQUEST FOR Rt43RDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY (See ~nstructions on reverse) / GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, D C 20408 1 . F R O M (Agency orestablishment) U.S. Department of Energy 2 . MAJOR SUBDIVISION Oak Ridge Operations Office 3. M I N O R SUBDIVISION I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposal of the agency's records; that the records proposed for disposal in this Request of 4 page(s) are not now needed for the business of this agency or will not be needed after the retention periods specified; and that written concurrence from the General Accounting Office, if required under the provisions of Title 8 of the GAO Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, is

106

disposition. prices | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

disposition. prices disposition. prices Dataset Summary Description This dataset comes from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and is part of the 2011 Annual Energy Outlook Report (AEO2011). This dataset is Table 15, and contains only the reference case. The dataset uses gigawatts. The data is broken down into production, net imports, consumption by sector and price. Source EIA Date Released April 26th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords 2011 AEO coal coal supply disposition. prices EIA Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon AEO2011: Coal Supply, Disposition, and Prices- Reference Case (xls, 91.7 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Peer Reviewed Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Annually Time Period 2008-2035 License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL)

107

Facility Disposition Projects  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Score Maturity Value Target Score Maturity Value Target Score A1 Cost Estimate H 7.5 1 7.5 5 37.5 5 37.5 A2 Cost Risk/Contingency Analysis P 3.0 1 3.0 5 15.0 5 15.0 A3 Funding Requirements/Profile H 7.5 1 7.5 4 30.0 5 37.5 A4 Independent Cost Estimate/Schedule Review P 3.0 N/A 0.0 5 15.0 5 15.0 A5 Life Cycle Cost P 3.0 1 3.0 4 12.0 5 15.0 A6 Forecast of Cost at Completion P 3.0 N/A 0.0 3 9.0 5 15.0 A7 Cost Estimate for Next Phase Work Scope P 3.0 5 15.0 5 15.0 5 15.0 Subtotal Cost 36.0 133.5 150.0 B1 Project Schedule H 7.5 1 7.5 4 30.0 5 37.5 B2 Major Milestones P 3.0 1 3.0 5 15.0 5 15.0 B3 Resource Loading P 3.0 1 3.0 4 12.0 5 15.0 B4 Critical Path Management H 7.5 1 7.5 4 30.0 5 37.5 B5 Schedule Risk/Contingency Analysis P 3.0 1 3.0 5 15.0 5 15.0 B6 Forecast of Schedule Completion P 3.0 N/A 0.0 3 9.0 5 15.0 B7 Schedule for Next Phase Work Scope P 3.0 5 15.0 5 15.0 5 15.0 Subtotal Schedule

108

Audit/Investigation Records | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Investigation Records AuditInvestigation Records This schedule covers records associated with investigations other than those performed by the Office of the Inspector General...

109

Security, Emergency Planning & Safety Records | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security, Emergency Planning & Safety Records Security, Emergency Planning & Safety Records ADM 180.pdf More Documents & Publications ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 18: SECURITY,...

110

EIS-0229: Record of Decision (January 1997) | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

January 1997) EIS-0229: Record of Decision (January 1997) Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials The Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to implement a...

111

EIS-0229: Record of Decision (November 2003) | Department of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

November 2003) EIS-0229: Record of Decision (November 2003) Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials The Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to implement a...

112

DOE Amends Record of Decision for Plutonium Consolidation  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE amended the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Specifically, DOE decided to take the...

113

Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM The Facility Disposition Safety Strategy (FDSS) Review Module is a tool that assists DOE federal...

114

EIS-0229: Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29: Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile 29: Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials EIS-0229: Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Summary The EIS will evaluate the reasonable alternatives and potential environmental impacts for the proposed siting, construction, and operation of three types of facilities for plutonium disposition. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available For Download September 5, 2007 EIS-0229: Supplement Analysis (September 2007) Storage of Surplus Plutonium Materials at the Savannah River Site November 14, 2003 EIS-0229: Record of Decision (November 2003) Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials November 7, 2003 EIS-0229-SA-03: Supplement Analysis Fabrication of Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies in Europe

115

EIS-0287: Idaho High-Level Waste & Facilities Disposition | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7: Idaho High-Level Waste & Facilities Disposition 7: Idaho High-Level Waste & Facilities Disposition EIS-0287: Idaho High-Level Waste & Facilities Disposition SUMMARY This EIS analyzes the potential environmental consequences of alternatives for managing high-level waste (HLW) calcine, mixed transuranic waste/sodium bearing waste (SBW) and newly generated liquid waste at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) in liquid and solid forms. This EIS also analyzes alternatives for the final disposition of HLW management facilities at the INEEL after their missions are completed. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD January 12, 2010 EIS-0287: Amended Record of Decision Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition January 4, 2010

116

The Schedule  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The schedule is one of the building blocks for project development. A schedule helps determine the duration of the project, the critical activities, and when funds are required. This chapter will briefly discuss some scheduling basics.

1997-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

117

Depleted uranium disposition study -- Supplement, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy Office of Weapons and Materials Planning has requested a supplemental study to update the recent Depleted Uranium Disposition report. This supplemental study addresses new disposition alternatives and changes in status.

Becker, G.W.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Disposition of excess highly enriched uranium status and update  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper presents the status of the US DOE program charged with the disposition of excess highly enriched uranium (HEU). Approximately 174 metric tonnes of HEU, with varying assays above 20 percent, has been declared excess from US nuclear weapons. A progress report on the identification and characterization of specific batches of excess HEU is provided, and plans for processing it into commercial nuclear fuel or low-level radioactive waste are described. The resultant quantities of low enriched fuel material expected from processing are given, as well as the estimated schedule for introducing the material into the commercial reactor fuel market. 2 figs., 3 tabs.

Williams, C.K. III; Arbital, J.G.

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

Fissile Materials Disposition | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Fissile Materials Disposition | National Nuclear Security Administration Fissile Materials Disposition | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Fissile Materials Disposition Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Fissile Materials Disposition Fissile Materials Disposition Since the end of the Cold War, significant quantities of plutonium and

120

Plutonium Disposition Program | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Plutonium Disposition Program Plutonium Disposition Program Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Fissile Materials Disposition > Plutonium Disposition Program Plutonium Disposition Program The U.S.-Russia Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement (PMDA), which entered into force on July 13, 2011, commits each country to dispose of at least 34 metric tons (MT) of weapon-grade plutonium withdrawn from their respective nuclear weapon programs. The U.S. remains firmly committed to its PMDA obligation to dispose of excess weapons plutonium. U.S. Plutonium Disposition The current U.S. plan to dispose of 34 MT of weapon-grade plutonium is to fabricate it into Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuel and irradiate it in existing light water reactors. This approach requires construction of new facilities

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Disposition Safety Strategy Review Module Facility Disposition Safety Strategy Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF Facilit C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R ty Dispos Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan sition Saf view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) fety Strat e pplicability D-3 EMENT tegy CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-1189-2008,

122

Savannah River Site Waste Disposition Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Terrel J. Spears Terrel J. Spears Assistant Manager Waste Disposition Project DOE Savannah River Operations Office Savannah River Site Savannah River Site Waste Disposition Project Waste Disposition Project 2 Waste Disposition Project - Mission Radioactive Liquid Waste - Tank Waste Stabilization and Disposition - Disposition 36 million gallons of radioactive liquid waste - Close 49 underground storage tanks in which the waste now resides 3 36.7 Million 33.7 Mgal (92%) 3.0 Mgal (8%) Saltcake Sludge Salt Supernate Volume Curies 397 Million Curies (MCi) 212 MCi (54%) 185 MCi (46%) Gallons (Mgal) 36.5 Million 33.5 Mgal (92%) 3.0 Mgal (8%) Liquid Waste Background Liquid Waste Background * 2 tanks closed * 49 tanks remaining to close - aging, carbon steel - 27 compliant, 22 non-compliant - 12 have known leak sites

123

Summary - Major Risk Factors Integrated Facility Disposition...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

& ORNL, Oak Ridge, TN EM Project: Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP) ETR Report Date: August 2008 ETR-15 United States Department of Energy Office of Environmental...

124

Uranium Downblending and Disposition Project Technology Readiness...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assessment EA-1488: Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition, Medical Isotope Production, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory,...

125

Plutonium Disposition Program | National Nuclear Security Administrati...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

accumulating newly separated weapon-grade plutonium. RUSSIAN PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION Russia plans to dispose of its 34 metric tons of weapon-grade plutonium by fabricating it...

126

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation Plan Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation Plan The primary objective of this report is to...

127

Weapons Dismantlement and Disposition NNSS Capabilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has tasked the WDD working group to disposition the large inventory of legacy classified weapon components scattered across the complex.

Pat Arnold

2011-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

UMTRA Project Administrative Files Collection Records Management Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The UPAFC Records Management Plan is based on the life cycle of a record - the evolution of a record from creation until final disposition. There are three major phases in the life cycle of a record: (1) creation and receipt, (2) maintenance and use, and (3) disposition. Accordingly, the Records Management Plan is structured to follow each of those phases. During each of the three phases, some kind of control is mandatory. The Records Management Plan establishes appropriate standards, policies, and procedures to ensure adequate control is always maintained. It includes a plan for records management, a plan for records management training activities, and a plan for auditing and appraising the program.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Rate Schedules  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

One of the major responsibilities of Southeastern is to design, formulate, and justify rate schedules. Repayment studies prepared by the agency determine revenue requirements and appropriate rate...

130

Nuclear Materials Disposition | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Materials Disposition Nuclear Materials Disposition Nuclear Materials Disposition Nuclear Materials Disposition In fulfilling its mission, EM frequently manages and completes disposition of surplus nuclear materials and spent nuclear fuel. These are not waste. They are nuclear materials no longer needed for national security or other purposes, including spent nuclear fuel, special nuclear materials (as defined by the Atomic Energy Act) and other Nuclear Materials. Spent Nuclear Fuel Spent nuclear fuel (SNF) is fuel that has been withdrawn from a nuclear reactor following irradiation, the constituent elements of which have not been separated by reprocessing. SNF may include: (1) intact, non-defective fuel assemblies or fuel rods; (2) failed fuel assemblies or fuel rods; (3) segments of fuel rods or pieces of fuel derived from spent fuel rods; and

131

SRS - Programs - Liquid Waste Disposition  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Liquid Waste Disposition Liquid Waste Disposition This includes both the solidification of highly radioactive liquid wastes stored in SRS's tank farms and disposal of liquid low-level waste generated as a by-product of the separations process and tank farm operations. This low-level waste is treated in the Effluent Treatment Facility. High-activity liquid waste is generated at SRS as by-products from the processing of nuclear materials for national defense, research and medical programs. The waste, totaling about 36 million gallons, is currently stored in 49 underground carbon-steel waste tanks grouped into two "tank farms" at SRS. While the waste is stored in the tanks, it separates into two parts: a sludge that settles on the bottom of the tank, and a liquid supernate that resides on top of the sludge. The waste is reduced to about 30 percent of its original volume by evaporation. The condensed evaporator "overheads" are transferred to the Effluent Treatment Project for final cleanup prior to release to the environment. As the concentrate cools a portion of it crystallizes forming solid saltcake. The concentrated supernate and saltcake are less mobile and therefore less likely to escape to the environment in the event of a tank crack or leak.

132

SI Group Scheduling Page  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Personnel On-Call Page Beamline Validation Schedule Group Organizational Chart Reviews Presentations Group Scheduling Page Project Scheduling Information Ops Scheduling Info Project / Scheduling Info APS fy2005 Annual Schedule ( html ) PSS Validation Schedule APS fy2006 Annual Schedule (html) PSS Validation Teams Latest Machine Studies Schedule (pdf) (html) New Builds Schedule (For SI GROUP Reference Only) Parasitic Beam Operations Schedule Ops Scheduling Page Shutdown Information Work Schedules August/September Shutdown Shutdown Work List Validation Schedule Safety Info Work Request Links ISM Core Functions Enter / Search Work Requests APS Safety Page Modify / Approve Work Requests Radiation Safety Policy APS TMS Training Profiles MSDS Search This page maintained by Joe Budz

133

EIS-0283: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with alternatives for the disposition of surplus plutonium.

134

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Used Fuel Disposition Campaign September 2012 FCR&D-USED-2011-000065 REV 1 DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or

135

Waste Disposition Update by Christine Gelles  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Disposition Update Waste Disposition Update Christine Gelles Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management (EM-30) EM SSAB Chairs Meeting Washington, DC 2 October 2012 www.em.doe.gov 2 o Waste Stream Highlights o DOE Transportation Update o Greater Than Class C (GTCC) Low Level Waste Environmental Impact Statement o Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future o Nuclear Regulatory Commission's LLW Regulatory Initiatives Discussion Topics www.em.doe.gov 3 Waste Stream Highlights www.em.doe.gov 4 o Within current budget outlook, it is especially critical that EM ensures safe, reliable and cost effective disposition paths exist. o The program's refocused organization and the detailed

136

CONDUCTING A RECORDS INVENTORY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING A RECORDS INVENTORY PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING A RECORDS INVENTORY Revision 1 10/31/07 Approved by: DOE Records Management Division, IM-23 PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING A RECORDS INVENTORY 1. GENERAL. A records inventory is compiling a descriptive list of each record series or system, including the location of the records and any other pertinent data. A records inventory is not a list of each document or each folder. 2. DEFINE THE RECORDS INVENTORY GOAL(S). The goals of a records inventory should be to: a. Gather information for scheduling purposes; b. Prepare for conversion to other media or to identify the volume of classified and/or permanent records in your organization's custody; and c. Identify any existing shortcomings, deficiencies, or problems with

137

Excess plutonium disposition using ALWR technology  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of Nuclear Energy of the Department of Energy chartered the Plutonium Disposition Task Force in August 1992. The Task Force was created to assess the range of practicable means of disposition of excess weapons-grade plutonium. Within the Task Force, working groups were formed to consider: (1) storage, (2) disposal,and(3) fission options for this disposition,and a separate group to evaluate nonproliferation concerns of each of the alternatives. As a member of the Fission Working Group, the Savannah River Technology Center acted as a sponsor for light water reactor (LWR) technology. The information contained in this report details the submittal that was made to the Fission Working Group of the technical assessment of LWR technology for plutonium disposition. The following aspects were considered: (1) proliferation issues, (2) technical feasibility, (3) technical availability, (4) economics, (5) regulatory issues, and (6) political acceptance.

Phillips, A. (ed.); Buckner, M.R.; Radder, J.A.; Angelos, J.G.; Inhaber, H.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

Amended Record of Decision for the Idaho High-Level Waste (HLW...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Record of Decision for the Idaho High-Level Waste (HLW) and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement Amended Record of Decision for the Idaho High-Level Waste...

139

Cost estimate and economic issues associated with the MOX option (prior to DOE`s record of decision)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Before the January 1997 Record of Decision (ROD), the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (DOE-MD) evaluated three technologies for the disposition of {approximately}50 MT of surplus plutonium from defense-related programs-reactors, immobilization, and deep boreholes. As part of the process supporting the ROD, and comprehensive assessment of technical viability, cost, and schedule was conducted by DOE-MD and its national laboratory contractors. Oak Ridge National Laboratory managed and coordinated the life-cycle cost (LCC) assessment effort for this program. This report discusses the economic analysis methodology and the results for the reactor options considered prior to ROD. A secondary intent of the report is to discuss major technical and economic issues that impact cost and schedule. To evaluate the economics of the reactor option and other technologies on an equitable basis, a set of cost-estimating guidelines and a common cost-estimating format were utilized by all three technology teams. This report includes the major economic analysis assumptions and the comparative constant-dollar and discounted-dollar LCCs for all nine reactor scenarios.

Reid, R.L.; Miller, J.W.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Record of Decision (ROD) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 13, 2002 September 13, 2002 EIS-0183: Record of Decision GNA Cliffs Energy Project September 6, 2002 EIS-0200: Revision to the Record of Decision Treatment and Storage of Transuranic Waste August 19, 2002 EIS-0303: Record of Decision Savannah River Site High-Level Waste Tank Closure July 10, 2002 EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision Interim Management of Nuclear Materials July 9, 2002 EIS-0293: Amended Record of Decision Conveyance and Transfer of Certain Land Tracts Administered by the Department of Energy and Located at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos and Santa Fe Counties, New Mexico April 19, 2002 EIS-0229: Amended Record of Decision (April 2002) Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program April 19, 2002 EIS-0283: Amended Record of Decision Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Rate schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Firm Power Service Provided by Rate/Charges Firm Power Service Provided by Rate/Charges Rate/Charges Effective Through (or until superceded) Firm Sales (SLIP-F9) Composite Rate SLIP 29.62 mills/kWh 9/30/2015 Demand Charge SLIP $5.18/kW-month 9/30/2015 Energy Charge SLIP 12.19 mills/kWh 9/30/2015 Cost Recovery Charge (CRC) SLIP 0 mills/kWh 9/30/2015 Transmission Service Provided by Current Rates effective10/12 - 9/15 (or until superceded) Rate Schedule Effective Through Firm Point-to-Point Transmission (SP-PTP7) CRSP $1.14 per kW-month $13.69/kW-year $0.00156/kW-hour $0.04/kW-day $0.26/kW-week 10/1/2008-9/30/2015 Network Integration Transmission (SP-NW3) CRSP see rate schedule 10/1/2008-9/30/2015 Non-Firm Point-to-Point Transmission (SP-NFT6) CRSP see rate schedule 10/1/2008-9/30/2015 Ancillary Services Provided by Rate Rate Schedule

142

DRAFT EM SSAB Chairs Meeting Waste Disposition Strategies Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM HQ Updates Waste Disposition Overview Christine Gelles Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Office of Environmental Management EM SSAB Chairs Meeting 5 November 2013 www.energy.gov/EM 2 * Waste Management Accomplishments and Priorities * National TRU Program Update * LLW/MLLW Disposal Update * Other Programmatic Updates * Disposition Maps - Current Tools Discussion Outline www.energy.gov/EM 3 FY13 Waste Management Accomplishments * WIPP: Emplaced 5,065 cubic meters of TRU with 89 percent of shipments departed from TRU waste sites as planned * Los Alamos: Met Framework Agreement goal for FY 13 ahead of schedule, disposing of over 1,800 cubic meters of legacy managed TRU waste * Oak Ridge: Partnered with regulators to develop strategy for

143

Microsoft Word - Changes-to-Schedules _Recovered_  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Changes-to-Schedules Changes-to-Schedules REV 5 DOE Administrative Records Schedules Changes Last revised: 12/10/2010 Date DOE Admin Schedule Item(s) Change Authorizing Document 9/15/10 - 12/10/2010 1-6, 9, 11-12, 14, 16-18, 22- 23 Various Removal of items at the end of each schedule for e-mail and word processing copies, which were added to the GRS in Transmittal Number 8. For schedules in which this item is located elsewhere and removal would cause changes in the sequence of item numbers, the item was changed to "Reserved" (Schedules ,4,5, and 14.) GRS Transmittal Number 22 9/15/2010 1 23.b.(3) Deleted citation, 5 CFR 214. GRS Transmittal Number 22 1 25.a. Text deleted "and as described in 29 CFR 1614." GRS Transmittal Number 22

144

EIS-0229: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Decision Decision EIS-0229: Amended Record of Decision Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is amending the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0229, 1996; Storage and Disposition PEIS). Specifically, DOE has decided to take the actions necessary to transfer approximately 2,511 additional 3013-compliant packages 1 containing surplus non-pit weapons-usable plutonium metals and oxides to the Savannah River Site (SRS), near Aiken, South Carolina. DOE/EIS-0229, Amended Record of Decision for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Final Programmatic Environmental Impact

145

Presentation Schedule  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Presentation Schedule Presentation Schedule (30 Min) Dave Wade - Dose Comparisons of once-thru and closed fuel cycles. (30 Min) Ralph Bennett - Roadmap Overview (15 Min) Neil Todreas - GRNS Perspectives and Recommendations (75 Min) Neil Todreas / - NERAC DISCUSSION Sal Levy 2 Generation IV Roadmap NERAC Subcommittee (GRNS) Bobby Abrams* Duke Engineering Douglas Chapin MPR Associates B. John Garrick Independent Consultant Dan Kammen University of California- Berkeley 3 Salomon Levy ** Levy & Associates Ted Marston Electrical Power Research Institute Bill Naughton Exelon Neil Todreas ** Massachusetts Institute of Technology * Resigned, July 2002 ** Co-chair GRNS Recruited Working Group Co-Chairs Jack Devine TWG-1 Water Cooled Phil Hildebrandt TWG-2 Gas Cooled Steve Rosen TWG-3 Metal Cooled Bill Rasin

146

Plutonium Disposition Program | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Home > Media Room > Fact Sheets > Plutonium Disposition Program Home > Media Room > Fact Sheets > Plutonium Disposition Program Fact Sheet Plutonium Disposition Program Jun 26, 2013 SUPPORTING NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION Weapon-grade plutonium and highly enriched uranium (HEU) are the critical ingredients for making a nuclear weapon. With the end of the Cold War, hundreds of tons of these materials were determined to be surplus to U.S. and Russian defense needs. Denying access to plutonium and HEU is the best way to prevent nuclear proliferation to rogue states and terrorist organizations. The most certain method to prevent these materials from falling into the wrong hands is to dispose of them. During the April 2010 Nuclear Security Summit, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov signed a protocol

147

U.S. and Russia Sign Plutonium Disposition Agreement | National...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home About Us Our History NNSA Timeline U.S. and Russia Sign Plutonium Disposition Agreement U.S. and Russia Sign Plutonium Disposition...

148

Shifts & Schedules  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Shifts & Schedules This page provides links to the various shifts and schedules that are used by the User ESH Support Group. FC Shift Schedule This page lists the current Operational Shift Schedule for the Floor Coordinators. FC DOR Schedule This page lists the current DOR Schedule for the Floor Coordinators. FC Off Shift Pager Schedule This tool lists the current schedule for the Floor Coordinator carring the 0101 during APS Shutdown periods. Long Range Operations Schedule This page lists the schedule of Operations for the current APS fiscal year. Machine Studies Schedule This page lists the current schedule of Operations for the Accelerator Systems during Machine Studies. PSS Validation Schedule This page lists the beamlines currently scheduled to have their Personnel Safety Systems validated.

149

DOE plutonium disposition study: Pu consumption in ALWRs. Volume 2, Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has contracted with Asea Brown Boveri-Combustion Engineering (ABB-CE) to provide information on the capability of ABB-CE`s System 80 + Advanced Light Water Reactor (ALWR) to transform, through reactor burnup, 100 metric tonnes (MT) of weapons grade plutonium (Pu) into a form which is not readily useable in weapons. This information is being developed as part of DOE`s Plutonium Disposition Study, initiated by DOE in response to Congressional action. This document Volume 2, provides a discussion of: Plutonium Fuel Cycle; Technology Needs; Regulatory Considerations; Cost and Schedule Estimates; and Deployment Strategy.

Not Available

1993-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

150

Characterizing Surplus US Plutonium for Disposition - 13199  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States (US) has identified 61.5 metric tons (MT) of plutonium that is permanently excess to use in nuclear weapons programs, including 47.2 MT of weapons-grade plutonium. Surplus inventories will be stored safely by the Department of Energy (DOE) and then transferred to facilities that will prepare the plutonium for permanent disposition. The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) operates a Feed Characterization program for the Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (OFMD) of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and the DOE Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM). SRNL manages a broad program of item tracking through process history, laboratory analysis, and non-destructive assay. A combination of analytical techniques allows SRNL to predict the isotopic and chemical properties that qualify materials for disposition through the Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility (MFFF). The research also defines properties that are important for other disposition paths, including disposal to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) as transuranic waste (TRUW) or to high-level waste (HLW) systems. (authors)

Allender, Jeffrey S. [Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken SC 29808 (United States)] [Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken SC 29808 (United States); Moore, Edwin N. [Moore Nuclear Energy, LLC, Savannah River Site, Aiken SC 29808 (United States)] [Moore Nuclear Energy, LLC, Savannah River Site, Aiken SC 29808 (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

151

Characterizing surplus US plutonium for disposition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States (US) has identified 61.5 metric tons (MT) of plutonium that is permanently excess to use in nuclear weapons programs, including 47.2 MT of weapons-grade plutonium. Surplus inventories will be stored safely by the Department of Energy (DOE) and then transferred to facilities that will prepare the plutonium for permanent disposition. The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) operates a Feed Characterization program for the Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (OFMD) of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and the DOE Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM). SRNL manages a broad program of item tracking through process history, laboratory analysis, and non-destructive assay. A combination of analytical techniques allows SRNL to predict the isotopic and chemical properties that qualify materials for disposition through the Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility (MFFF). The research also defines properties that are important for other disposition paths, including disposal to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) as transuranic waste (TRUW) or to high-level waste (HLW) systems.

Allender, Jeffrey S.; Moore, Edwin N.

2013-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

152

Implementing Lottery Scheduling: Matching the Specializations in Traditional Schedulers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

present in traditional non- real time process schedulers. Lottery scheduling enables flexible control over this while maintaining lottery scheduling's flexible control over relative execution rates and loadImplementing Lottery Scheduling: Matching the Specializations in Traditional Schedulers David

153

Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0240-S EIS-0240-S For Further Information Contact: U.S. Departmel>t of Energy Office of Fissile Materials Disposition, 1000 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20585 . This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; telephone (423) 576-8401 for prices, Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Copies of this document are available (while supplies last) upon written request to: Office of Fissile Materials Disposition, MD-4 Forrestal Building United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. .__- -. @ .: Depafimmt of Energy . i i~t " Wastin@on, DC 20585 June 1996 Dear hterested

154

Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

@ @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. ,, ,, This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors horn the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; telephone (423) 576-8401 for prices, Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Copies of this document are available (while supplies last) upon written request to: Office of Fissile Materials Disposition, MD-4 ' Forrestal Building United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 1996 Dear hterested Party: The Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium Final Environmental Impact Statemnt is enclosed for your information. This document has been prepared in accordance

155

Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

. . ------- .--- --. ---- DOE/EIS-0240 I United States Department of Energy I For Further Information Contact: U.S. Department of Energy Otice of Fissile Materials Disposition, 1000 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20585 1 I ---- I I . I I I I This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; telephone (423) 576-8401 for prices. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Copies of this document are available (while supplies last) upon written request to: I Office of Fissile Materials Disposition, MD-4 Forrestal Building United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 , @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. -_. - COVERS~ET

156

The ultimate disposition of depleted uranium  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Depleted uranium (DU) is produced as a by-product of the uranium enrichment process. Over 340,000 MTU of DU in the form of UF{sub 6} have been accumulated at the US government gaseous diffusion plants and the stockpile continues to grow. An overview of issues and objectives associated with the inventory management and the ultimate disposition of this material is presented.

Lemons, T.R. [Uranium Enrichment Organization, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

157

SRS - Programs - H Area Nuclear Materials Disposition  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

H Area Nuclear Materials Disposition H Area Nuclear Materials Disposition The primary mission of the H-Canyon Complex is to dissolve, purify and blend-down surplus highly enriched uranium (HEU) and aluminum-clad foreign and domestic research reactor fuel to produce a low enriched uranium (LEU) solution suitable for conversion to commercial reactor fuel. A secondary mission for H-Canyon is to dissolve excess plutonium (Pu) not suitable for MOX and transfer it for vitrification in the Defense Waste Processing Facility at SRS. H Canyon was constructed in the early 1950s and began operations in 1955. The building is called a canyon because of its long rectangular shape and two continuous trenches that contains the process vessels. It is approximately 1,000 feet long with several levels to accommodate the various stages of material stabilization, including control rooms to monitor overall equipment and operating processes, equipment and piping gallery for solution transport, storage, and disposition, and unique overhead bridge cranes to support overall process operations. All work is remotely controlled, and employees are further protected from radiation by thick concrete walls.

158

Update of the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Implementation Plan |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Update of the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Implementation Plan Update of the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Implementation Plan Update of the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Implementation Plan The Used Fuel Disposition Campaign will identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. This Campaign Implementation Plan provides summary level detail describing how the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign supports achievement of the overarching Fuel Cycle Research and Development Program mission and objectives. Activities will be sufficiently flexible to accommodate any of the potential fuel cycle options for used fuel management. Update of the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Implementation Plan

159

Waste and Materials Disposition Information | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste and Materials Disposition Waste and Materials Disposition Information Waste and Materials Disposition Information Waste and Materials Disposition Information As the Office of Environmental Management (EM) fulfills its mission, waste and materials disposition plays a vital role in the cleanup of radioactive waste and the environmental legacy of nuclear weapons production and nuclear energy research. Disposal of waste frequently falls on the critical path of cleanup projects. Significant planning resources are spent to identify alternatives and find a path that is cost-effective and in the best interest of the Federal government. In many instances, waste disposition, (processing, treatment and disposal) is part of cleanup agreements and is of interest to stakeholders and requires the oversight of regulators.

160

EA-1488: Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition,...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition, Medical Isotope Production, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Phase I Ring Compression Testing...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Phase I Ring Compression Testing of High Burnup Cladding Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Phase I Ring Compression Testing of High Burnup Cladding The purpose of ring compression...

162

Major Risk Factors to the Integrated Facility Disposition Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The scope of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP) needs to comprehensively address a wide range of environmental management risks atthe Oak Ridge Reservation (ORO).

163

Consent Order, Uranium Disposition Services, LLC- NCO-2010-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Issued to Uranium Disposition Services, LLC related to Construction Deficiencies at the DUF6 Conversion Buildings at the Portsmouth and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plants

164

Office of UNF Disposition International Program - Strategic Plan |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

UNF Disposition International Program - Strategic Plan UNF Disposition International Program - Strategic Plan Office of UNF Disposition International Program - Strategic Plan The Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy, Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition Research and Development Office (UFD), performs the critical mission of addressing the need for an integrated strategy that combines safe storage of spent nuclear fuel with expeditious progress toward siting and licensing a disposal facility or facilities. The UFD International Program plays a key role in this effort. International collaboration provides a forum for exchanging strategies, expertise, and technologies with other nations that have also been investigating solutions to the problems of nuclear waste disposal-information that otherwise would have

165

March 29, 2008 OS:CPU Scheduling 1 CPU Scheduling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

control of the CPU to the process selected by the short-term scheduler. Its function involves: SwitchingMarch 29, 2008 OS:CPU Scheduling 1 CPU Scheduling #12;March 29, 2008 OS:CPU Scheduling 2 Objectives Basic Concepts + Scheduling Criteria + Scheduling Algorithms + Scheduling Algorithm Evaluation + Summary

Adam, Salah

166

To: NATIONAL ARCHIVES & RECORDS ADMINISTRATION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NATIONAL ARCHIVES & RECORDS ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES & RECORDS ADMINISTRATION 860 1 ADELPHI ROAD COLLEGE PARK. MD 20740-600 1 . . r -?-! *. P 1 Date received 3 - 1 4 - 0 1 -BITION AUTHORITY -~ra-i;,,?i~ FOR RECORDS .. JOB ?(-? - / * - w / - q34:0/-3 - - - - 1. FROM (Agency or establishment) Ni?TIFICAtlON TO AGENCY U.S. Department of Energy 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, Maryland 20874-1 290 - 4. NAME OF PERSON WITH WHOM TO CONFER *- NUMBER DATE Lortie Robb, INEEL 208-526-8161 7 - 2 - 0 2 In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a, Ute disposition request, lncludtng amendments, is approved except for items that may be marked 'disposition nut approved* or - 2 MAJOR SUBDIVISION 0 Pro r w 4 3. AGENCY CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the dispositi

167

EM Waste and Materials Disposition & Transportation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

On Closure Success On Closure Success 1 EM Waste and Materials Disposition & Transportation National Transportation Stakeholders Forum Chicago, Illinois May 26, 2010 Frank Marcinowski Acting Chief Technical Officer and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Technical and Regulatory Support Office of Environmental Management DOE's Radioactive Waste Management Priorities * Continue to manage waste inventories in a safe and compliant manner * Address high risk waste in a cost- ff ti effective manner * Maintain and optimize current disposal capability for future generations * Develop future disposal capacity in a complex environment * Promote the development of treatment and disposal alternatives in the 2 and disposal alternatives in the

168

EIS-0287: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement, EIS-0287 (September 2002) EIS-0287: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition...

169

Life cycle costs for the domestic reactor-based plutonium disposition option  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Projected constant dollar life cycle cost (LCC) estimates are presented for the domestic reactor-based plutonium disposition program being managed by the US Department of Energy Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (DOE/MD). The scope of the LCC estimate includes: design, construction, licensing, operation, and deactivation of a mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility (FFF) that will be used to purify and convert weapons-derived plutonium oxides to MOX fuel pellets and fabricate MOX fuel bundles for use in commercial pressurized-water reactors (PWRs); fuel qualification activities and modification of facilities required for manufacture of lead assemblies that will be used to qualify and license this MOX fuel; and modification, licensing, and operation of commercial PWRs to allow irradiation of a partial core of MOX fuel in combination with low-enriched uranium fuel. The baseline cost elements used for this document are the same as those used for examination of the preferred sites described in the site-specific final environmental impact statement and in the DOE Record of Decision that will follow in late 1999. Cost data are separated by facilities, government accounting categories, contract phases, and expenditures anticipated by the various organizations who will participate in the program over a 20-year period. Total LCCs to DOE/MD are projected at approximately $1.4 billion for a 33-MT plutonium disposition mission.

Williams, K.A.

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Ridge  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory & Y-12 for Transfer of Facilities & Materials to EM Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory & Y-12 for Transfer of Facilities & Materials to EM In December 2007, the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management (EM-1) invited the DOE Program Secretarial Offices (PSOs) of Nuclear Energy (NE), Science (SC), and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to propose facilities and legacy waste for transfer to Environmental Management (EM) for final disposition or deactivation and decommissioning (D&D). Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory & Y-12 for Transfer of Facilities & Materials to EM

171

EIS-0327: Disposition of Scrap Metals Programmatic EIS | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

27: Disposition of Scrap Metals Programmatic EIS 27: Disposition of Scrap Metals Programmatic EIS EIS-0327: Disposition of Scrap Metals Programmatic EIS Summary This EIS will evaluate the environmental impacts of policy alternatives for the disposition of scrap metals (primarily carbon steel and stainless steel) that may have residual surface radioactivity. DOE is cancelling this EIS. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download December 19, 2011 EA-1919: Notice of Revision to Clearance Policy Recycle of Scrap Metals Originating from Radiological Areas (December 2011) July 12, 2001 EIS-0327: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Announcement of Public Scoping Meetings Disposition of Scrap Metals

172

Properties and Dispositions: Some Metaphysical Remarks on Quantum Ontology  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

After some suggestions about how to clarify the confused metaphysical distinctions between dispositional and non?dispositional or categorical properties I review some of the main interpretations of QM in order to show that with the relevant exception of Bohms minimalist interpretation quantum ontology is irreducibly dispositional. Such an irreducible character of dispositions must be explained differently in different interpretations but the reducibility of the contextual properties in the case of Bohmian mechanics is guaranteed by the fact that the positions of particles play the role of the categorical basis a role that in other interpretations cannot be filled by anything else. In Bohrs and Everett?type interpretations dispositionalism is instrumentalism in disguise.

Mauro Dorato

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Ridge  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory & Y-12 for Transfer of Facilities & Materials to EM Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory & Y-12 for Transfer of Facilities & Materials to EM In December 2007, the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management (EM-1) invited the DOE Program Secretarial Offices (PSOs) of Nuclear Energy (NE), Science (SC), and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to propose facilities and legacy waste for transfer to Environmental Management (EM) for final disposition or deactivation and decommissioning (D&D). Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory & Y-12 for Transfer of Facilities & Materials to EM

174

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation Plan Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation Plan The primary objective of this report is to determine whether the existing Fuel Cycle Technologies (FCT) Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD) is sufficient for work to be performed in the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC), and where the existing QAPD is not sufficient, supply recommendations for changes to the QAPD to accommodate the UFDC. The FCT QAPD provides a sound and useable foundation for the implementation of QA for UFDC R&D activities, including the application of QA in a graded approach. Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation Plan More Documents & Publications

175

EIS-0283-S2: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-S2: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental 3-S2: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0283-S2: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Summary This EIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with changes to the surplus plutonium disposition program, including changes to the inventory of surplus plutonium and proposed new alternatives. The original EIS is available here. For more information, see: www.nnsa.energy.gov/nepa/spdsupplementaleis Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download April 25, 2013 EIS-0283-S2: Interim Action Determination Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (K-Area Materials Storage (KAMS) Area Expansion at the Savannah River Site)

176

Hight-Level Waste & Facilities Disposition  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

High-Level Waste (HLW) and Facilities Disposition Final High-Level Waste (HLW) and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement You are here: DOE-ID Home > Environmental Management > Idaho High-Level Waste (HLW) Table of Contents Documents are in the Adobe® PDF format and require the Adobe® Reader to access them. If you do not currently have the Acrobat Reader, you can download the Free Adobe Reader at http://get.adobe.com/reader/ Icon link to Free Adobe Acrobat Reader software * Large chapters broken down into sections Summary* Cover [ Adobe Acrobat File Size 1.48 MB] Section, 1.0 [ Adobe Acrobat File Size 612 KB] Section, 2.0 [ Adobe Acrobat File Size 251 KB] Sections, 3.0 - 3.2.1a [ Adobe Acrobat File Size 1.4 MB] Section, 3.2.1b [ Adobe Acrobat File Size 2.0 MB] Sections, 3.2.2 - 4.0 [ Adobe Acrobat File Size 1.4 MB]

177

SSRL- Experimental Run Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY2008 Experimental Run Schedules 2008 Run Ends August 11, 2008. User Operations will resume November 2008. Operating Maintenance Beam Line Schedule FY2009 FY2008 X-ray (1-4,...

178

SRI2007 Conference - Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Home Registration Abstract Submission Proceedings Manuscript Review Conference Schedule Poster Session Satellite Workshops Conference Committee Accommodations Vendors Travel tips...

179

Disposition options for {sup 233}U  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States is implementing a program to dispose of excess nuclear-weapons-usable materials--including {sup 233}U. A series of studies have identified multiple {sup 233}U disposition options, and these options are described herein. Most of the options involve adding depleted uranium containing {sup 238}U to the {sup 233}U. Converting the {sup 233}U into a mixture of <12 wt % {sup 233}U in {sup 238}U converts the weapons-usable {sup 233}U into nonweapons-usable {sup 233}U. For {sup 233}U that is considered waste, further isotopic dilution to <0.66 wt % {sup 233}U in {sup 238}U minimizes potential long-term repository criticality concerns and in many cases minimizes final waste volumes.

Forsberg, C.W.; Icenhour, A.S.; Krichinsky, A.M.

1998-04-27T23:59:59.000Z

180

Neutron Assay System for Confinement Vessel Disposition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Los Alamos National Laboratory has a number of spherical confinement vessels (CVs) remaining from tests involving nuclear materials. These vessels have an inner diameter of 6 feet with 1-inch thick steel walls. The goal of the Confinement Vessel Disposition (CVD) project is to remove debris and reduce contamination inside the CVs. The Confinement Vessel Assay System (CVAS) was developed to measure the amount of special nuclear material (SNM) in CVs before and after cleanout. Prior to cleanout, the system will be used to perform a verification measurement of each vessel. After cleanout, the system will be used to perform safeguards-quality assays of {le}100-g {sup 239}Pu equivalent in a vessel for safeguards termination. The CVAS has been tested and calibrated in preparation for verification and safeguards measurements.

Frame, Katherine C. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Bourne, Mark M. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Crooks, William J. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Evans, Louise [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Mayo, Douglas R. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Miko, David K. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Salazar, William R. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Stange, Sy [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Valdez, Jose I. [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Vigil, Georgiana M. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

RS-WEAPONS Records  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

~ ~ o c tnstructions o n r e v e r s e ) ' T O NATIONAL ARCHIVES and RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NIR) \$'ASHINGTON. DC 20108 ' 1 FROM (Agency or establishment) U. S . De~artment of E ~ r n v 2 MAJOR SUBDIVISION 3 MINOR SUBDlVlSlOtJ I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposition of its records and that the records roposed for disposal on the attached 38 page(s) are not noJv needed for the business of t h ~ s agency or wi f not be needed after the retention erlods s ecified; and that wrritten concurrence from ,4eencies, P P the General A c c o u ~ t ~ n g Offlce, u n d e r the p r o v ~ s i o n s o Title 8 o the G A O M a n u a l for Guidance of Federal L t A V E BLANK (NARA use only) 'JOB NUMBER h / / - 4 3 C t ~ 7 6 -- 3 - DATE Z - 2 3 - 7 6 NOTIFICATIONTO AGENCY

182

The ultimate disposition of depleted uranium  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Significant amounts of the depleted uranium (DU) created by past uranium enrichment activities have been sold, disposed of commercially, or utilized by defense programs. In recent years, however, the demand for DU has become quite small compared to quantities available, and within the US Department of Energy (DOE) there is concern for any risks and/or cost liabilities that might be associated with the ever-growing inventory of this material. As a result, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. (Energy Systems), was asked to review options and to develop a comprehensive plan for inventory management and the ultimate disposition of DU accumulated at the gaseous diffusion plants (GDPs). An Energy Systems task team, under the chairmanship of T. R. Lemons, was formed in late 1989 to provide advice and guidance for this task. This report reviews options and recommends actions and objectives in the management of working inventories of partially depleted feed (PDF) materials and for the ultimate disposition of fully depleted uranium (FDU). Actions that should be considered are as follows. (1) Inspect UF{sub 6} cylinders on a semiannual basis. (2) Upgrade cylinder maintenance and storage yards. (3) Convert FDU to U{sub 3}O{sub 8} for long-term storage or disposal. This will include provisions for partial recovery of costs to offset those associated with DU inventory management and the ultimate disposal of FDU. Another recommendation is to drop the term tails'' in favor of depleted uranium'' or DU'' because the tails'' label implies that it is waste.'' 13 refs.

Not Available

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Major Risk Factors to the Integrated Facility Disposition Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oak Ridge Reservation Tennessee Major Risk Factors to the Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP) Challenge The scope of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP) needs to comprehensively address a wide range of environmental management risks at the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORO). These include: environmental remediation, regulatory compliance, deactivation and decommissioning (D&D) activities, and disposition of legacy materials and waste, along with the ongoing modernization, reindustrialization, and reconfiguration initiatives at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and at the Y-12 National Security Complex. The balancing of the broad nature of these activities and issues at ORO are a key challenge for the IFDP especially since their interrelationship is not always obvious.

184

Record of Decision (ROD) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 18, 2011 August 18, 2011 EIS-0240: Amended Record of Decision Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium July 20, 2011 EIS-0387: Record of Decision Y-12 National Security Complex July 8, 2011 EIS-0380: Amended Record of Decision Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico April 18, 2011 EIS-0416: Record of Decision Issuance of Loan Guarantees to Solar Partners I, LLC, Solar Partners II, LLC, and Solar Partners VIII, LLC, for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Units 1, 2, 3 March 11, 2011 EIS-0422: Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration's Central Ferry-Lower Monumental 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project January 12, 2011 EIS-0407: Record of Decision Abengoa Biorefinery Project Near Hugoton, Stevens County, Kansas November 29, 2010

185

Record of Decision (ROD) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 19, 2008 December 19, 2008 EIS-0236: Record of Decision Complex Transformation --Tritium Research and Development, Flight Test Operations, and Major Environmental Test Facilities December 19, 2008 EIS-0236: Record of Decision Complex Transformation-Operations Involving Plutonium, Uranium, and the Assembly and Disassembly of Nuclear Weapons December 10, 2008 EIS-0283: Amended Record of Decision Surplus Plutonium Disposition: Waste Solidification Building November 17, 2008 EIS-0399: Record of Decision Montana Alberta Tie Ltd. 230-kV Transmission Line Project November 6, 2008 EIS-0312: Record of Decision 2008 Columbia Basin Fish Accords Memorandum of Agreement with the Shoshone-Banock Tribes October 10, 2008 EIS-0369: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings

186

DOE Seeks Industry Input on Nickel Disposition Strategy | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Seeks Industry Input on Nickel Disposition Strategy DOE Seeks Industry Input on Nickel Disposition Strategy DOE Seeks Industry Input on Nickel Disposition Strategy March 23, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Energy Department's prime contractor, Fluor-B&W Portsmouth (FBP), managing the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (GDP), issued a request for Expressions of Interest (EOI) seeking industry input to support the development of an acquisition strategy for potential disposition of DOE nickel. The EOI requests technical, financial, and product market information to review the feasibility of technologies capable of decontaminating the nickel to a level indistinguishable from what is commercially available, such that it could be safely recycled and reused. The EOI scope is for 6,400 tons of nickel to be recovered from the uranium enrichment process

187

WASTE DISPOSITION PROJECT MAKES GREAT STRIDES AT THE IDAHO SITE |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WASTE DISPOSITION PROJECT MAKES GREAT STRIDES AT THE IDAHO SITE WASTE DISPOSITION PROJECT MAKES GREAT STRIDES AT THE IDAHO SITE WASTE DISPOSITION PROJECT MAKES GREAT STRIDES AT THE IDAHO SITE April 1, 2010 - 12:00pm Addthis An operator uses robotic manipulators to process RH TRU. An operator uses robotic manipulators to process RH TRU. Idaho - The Waste Disposition Project Team at the Department of Energy's Idaho Site has continued to keep its commitment to remove remote handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste out of Idaho, protecting the Snake River Plain Aquifer and keeping the Office of Environmental Management's commitment to environmental clean up. In 2007, the first shipment of RH TRU waste left the gates of the Idaho Site, headed to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for disposal. In the three years since, devoted individuals on the CH2M-WG, Idaho's (CWI)

188

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Preliminary Quality Assurance Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation Plan Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation Plan The primary objective of this report is to determine whether the existing Fuel Cycle Technologies (FCT) Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD) is sufficient for work to be performed in the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC), and where the existing QAPD is not sufficient, supply recommendations for changes to the QAPD to accommodate the UFDC. The FCT QAPD provides a sound and useable foundation for the implementation of QA for UFDC R&D activities, including the application of QA in a graded approach. Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Preliminary Quality Assurance Implementation Plan More Documents & Publications Used Fuel Disposition Campaign International Activities Implementation Plan

189

AEO2011: Liquid Fuels Supply and Disposition | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Liquid Fuels Supply and Disposition Liquid Fuels Supply and Disposition Dataset Summary Description This dataset comes from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and is part of the 2011 Annual Energy Outlook Report (AEO2011). This dataset is table 11, and contains only the reference case. The dataset uses million barrels per day. The data is broken down into crude oil, other petroleum supply, other non petroleum supply and liquid fuel consumption. Source EIA Date Released April 26th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords 2011 AEO disposition EIA liquid fuels Supply Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon AEO2011: Liquid Fuels Supply and Disposition- Reference Case (xls, 117 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Peer Reviewed Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Annually

190

Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework Completing the Office of River Protection (ORP) mission of stabilizing 56 million gallons of chemical and radioactive waste stored in Hanford's 177 tanks is one of the Energy Department's highest priorities. This Framework document outlines a phased approach for beginning tank waste treatment while continuing to resolve technical issues with the Pretreatment and High-Level Waste Facilities. Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework More Documents & Publications EIS-0391: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farm Program EIS-0356: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

191

WASTE DISPOSITION PROJECT MAKES GREAT STRIDES AT THE IDAHO SITE |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WASTE DISPOSITION PROJECT MAKES GREAT STRIDES AT THE IDAHO SITE WASTE DISPOSITION PROJECT MAKES GREAT STRIDES AT THE IDAHO SITE WASTE DISPOSITION PROJECT MAKES GREAT STRIDES AT THE IDAHO SITE April 1, 2010 - 12:00pm Addthis An operator uses robotic manipulators to process RH TRU. An operator uses robotic manipulators to process RH TRU. Idaho - The Waste Disposition Project Team at the Department of Energy's Idaho Site has continued to keep its commitment to remove remote handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste out of Idaho, protecting the Snake River Plain Aquifer and keeping the Office of Environmental Management's commitment to environmental clean up. In 2007, the first shipment of RH TRU waste left the gates of the Idaho Site, headed to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for disposal. In the three years since, devoted individuals on the CH2M-WG, Idaho's (CWI)

192

Low Level Waste Disposition - Quantity and Inventory | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Low Level Waste Disposition - Quantity and Inventory Low Level Waste Disposition - Quantity and Inventory Low Level Waste Disposition - Quantity and Inventory This study has been prepared by the Used Fuel Disposition (UFD) campaign of the Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCR&D) program. The purpose of this study is to provide an estimate of the volume of low level waste resulting from a variety of commercial fuel cycle alternatives in order to support subsequent system-level evaluations of disposal system performance. This study provides an estimate of Class A/B/C low level waste (LLW), greater than Class C (GTCC) waste, mixed LLW and mixed GTCC waste generated from the following initial set of fuel cycles and recycling processes: 1. Operations at a geologic repository based upon a once through light

193

Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework Completing the Office of River Protection (ORP) mission of stabilizing 56 million gallons of chemical and radioactive waste stored in Hanford's 177 tanks is one of the Energy Department's highest priorities. This Framework document outlines a phased approach for beginning tank waste treatment while continuing to resolve technical issues with the Pretreatment and High-Level Waste Facilities. Hanford Tank Waste Retrieval, Treatment and Disposition Framework More Documents & Publications EIS-0391: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Waste Treatment Plant and Tank Farm Program EIS-0356: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

194

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology (OFCT) has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct the research and development (R&D) activities related to storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and high level nuclear waste (HLW). The Mission of the UFDC is To identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The U.S. has, for the past twenty-plus years, focused efforts on disposing

195

Low Level Waste Disposition - Quantity and Inventory | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Low Level Waste Disposition - Quantity and Inventory Low Level Waste Disposition - Quantity and Inventory Low Level Waste Disposition - Quantity and Inventory This study has been prepared by the Used Fuel Disposition (UFD) campaign of the Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCR&D) program. The purpose of this study is to provide an estimate of the volume of low level waste resulting from a variety of commercial fuel cycle alternatives in order to support subsequent system-level evaluations of disposal system performance. This study provides an estimate of Class A/B/C low level waste (LLW), greater than Class C (GTCC) waste, mixed LLW and mixed GTCC waste generated from the following initial set of fuel cycles and recycling processes: 1. Operations at a geologic repository based upon a once through light

196

Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System Evaluation Phase I Report Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System Evaluation Phase I Report The natural barrier system (NBS) is an integral part of a geologic nuclear waste repository. The report describes progress in development of an integrated modeling framework that can be used for systematically analyzing the performance of a natural barrier system and identifying key factors that control the performance. This framework is designed as an integrated tool for prioritization and programmatic decisions. Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System Evaluation Phase I Report More Documents & Publications Natural System Evaluation and Tool Development FY11 Progress Report

197

DOE Seeks Industry Input on Nickel Disposition Strategy | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Industry Input on Nickel Disposition Strategy Industry Input on Nickel Disposition Strategy DOE Seeks Industry Input on Nickel Disposition Strategy March 23, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Energy Department's prime contractor, Fluor-B&W Portsmouth (FBP), managing the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (GDP), issued a request for Expressions of Interest (EOI) seeking industry input to support the development of an acquisition strategy for potential disposition of DOE nickel. The EOI requests technical, financial, and product market information to review the feasibility of technologies capable of decontaminating the nickel to a level indistinguishable from what is commercially available, such that it could be safely recycled and reused. The EOI scope is for 6,400 tons of nickel to be recovered from the uranium enrichment process

198

Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System Evaluation Phase I Report Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System Evaluation Phase I Report The natural barrier system (NBS) is an integral part of a geologic nuclear waste repository. The report describes progress in development of an integrated modeling framework that can be used for systematically analyzing the performance of a natural barrier system and identifying key factors that control the performance. This framework is designed as an integrated tool for prioritization and programmatic decisions. Integrated Tool Development for Used Fuel Disposition Natural System Evaluation Phase I Report More Documents & Publications Natural System Evaluation and Tool Development FY11 Progress Report

199

AEO2011: Coal Supply, Disposition, and Prices | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Supply, Disposition, and Prices Supply, Disposition, and Prices Dataset Summary Description This dataset comes from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and is part of the 2011 Annual Energy Outlook Report (AEO2011). This dataset is Table 15, and contains only the reference case. The dataset uses gigawatts. The data is broken down into production, net imports, consumption by sector and price. Source EIA Date Released April 26th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords 2011 AEO coal coal supply disposition. prices EIA Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon AEO2011: Coal Supply, Disposition, and Prices- Reference Case (xls, 91.7 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Peer Reviewed Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Annually Time Period 2008-2035 License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL)

200

EA-1977: Acceptance and Disposition of Used Nuclear Fuel Containing...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Fuel Containing U.S.-Origin Highly Enriched Uranium from the Federal Republic of Germany EA-1977: Acceptance and Disposition of Used Nuclear Fuel Containing U.S.-Origin...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Americium/Curium Disposition Life Cycle Planning Study  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At the request of the Department of Energy Savannah River Office (DOE- SR), Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) evaluated concepts to complete disposition of Americium and Curium (Am/Cm) bearing materials currently located at the Savannah River Site (SRS).

Jackson, W.N. [Westinghouse Savannah River Company, AIKEN, SC (United States); Krupa, J.; Stutts, P.; Nester, S.; Raimesch, R.

1998-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

202

EIS-0327: Disposition of Scrap Metals Programmatic EIS  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS will evaluate the environmental impacts of policy alternatives for the disposition of scrap metals (primarily carbon steel and stainless steel) that may have residual surface radioactivity. DOE is cancelling this EIS.

203

A Study of Cattle Disposition: Exploring QTL Associated with Temperament  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

In any production setting, cattle disposition (temperament) has a great impact on handling and performance. Thus, behavior can be economically important, yielding the rationale for study. Wegenhoft (2005) previously identified several quantitative...

Boldt, Clayton Ryan

2008-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

204

A pipeline scheduling model  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A PIPELINE SCHEDULING MODEL A Thesis by THOMAS MELVIN BEATTY Submitted to the Graduate College of Texas AAM University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of MASTER QF SCIENCE August 1975 Major Subject: Computing... Science R PIPELINE SCHEDULING MODEL A Thesis by THOMAS MELVIN BEATTY Approved as to style and content by: Chairman of ommittee Member (Head o f Department ) Member August 1975 ABSTRACT A PIPELINE SCHEDULING MODEL (August 1975) Thomas Melvin...

Beatty, Thomas Melvin

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

205

DISPOSITION PATHS FOR ROCKY FLATS GLOVEBOXES: EVALUATING OPTIONS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC has the responsibility for closure activities at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS). One of the challenges faced for closure is the disposition of radiologically contaminated gloveboxes. Evaluation of the disposition options for gloveboxes included a detailed analysis of available treatment capabilities, disposal facilities, and lifecycle costs. The Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC followed several processes in determining how the gloveboxes would be managed for disposition. Currently, multiple disposition paths have been chosen to accommodate the needs of the varying styles and conditions of the gloveboxes, meet the needs of the decommissioning team, and to best manage lifecycle costs. Several challenges associated with developing a disposition path that addresses both the radiological and RCRA concerns as well as offering the most cost-effective solution were encountered. These challenges included meeting the radiological waste acceptance criteria of available disposal facilities, making a RCRA determination, evaluating treatment options and costs, addressing void requirements associated with disposal, and identifying packaging and transportation options. The varying disposal facility requirements affected disposition choices. Facility conditions that impacted decisions included radiological and chemical waste acceptance criteria, physical requirements, and measurement for payment options. The facility requirements also impacted onsite activities including management strategies, decontamination activities, and life-cycle cost.

Lobdell, D.; Geimer, R.; Larsen, P.; Loveland, K.

2003-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

206

The Savannah River Site`s groundwater monitoring program: 1990 sampling schedule  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This schedule provides a final record of the 1990 sampling schedule for the SRS groundwater monitoring program conducted by the Environmental Protection Department/Environmental Section (EPD/EMS). It includes all the wells monitored by EPD/EMS at SRS during 1990 and identifies the constituents sampled, the sampling frequency, and the reasons for sampling. Sampling requests are incorporated into the schedule throughout the year. Drafts of the schedule are produced and revised quarterly.

Rogers, C.D. [Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States)

1991-02-07T23:59:59.000Z

207

EIS-0240: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

40: Amended Record of Decision 40: Amended Record of Decision EIS-0240: Amended Record of Decision Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-autonomous agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is amending the August 5, 1996, Record of Decision (the 1996 ROD) (61 FR 40619) for the Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium Environmental Impact Statement (HEU EIS) (DOE/EIS-0240). The 1996 ROD included DOE's decision to implement a program to render a nominal 200 metric tons of surplus highly-enriched uranium (HEU) non-weapons-usable by blending it down to low-enriched uranium (LEU) and selling as much of the resulting LEU as possible (up to 85 percent) for use as reactor fuel. In 2007, NNSA prepared a Supplement Analysis (DOE/EIS-0240-SA1) to the HEU EIS but

208

TRACKING SURPLUS PLUTONIUM FROM WEAPONS TO DISPOSITION  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Supporting nuclear nonproliferation and global security principles, beginning in 1994 the United States has withdrawn more than 50 metric tons (MT) of government-controlled plutonium from potential use in nuclear weapons. The Department of Energy (DOE), including the National Nuclear Security Administration, established protocols for the tracking of this "excess" and "surplus" plutonium, and for reconciling the current storage and utilization of the plutonium to show that its management is consistent with the withdrawal policies. Programs are underway to ensure the safe and secure disposition of the materials that formed a major part of the weapons stockpile during the Cold War, and growing quantities have been disposed as waste, after which they are not included in traditional nuclear material control and accountability (NMC&A) data systems. A combination of resources is used to perform the reconciliations that form the basis for annual reporting to DOE, to U.S. Department of State, and to international partners including the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Allender, J.; Beams, J.; Sanders, K.; Myers, L.

2013-07-16T23:59:59.000Z

209

Definition: Dynamic Interchange Schedule Or Dynamic Schedule | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Schedule Or Dynamic Schedule Schedule Or Dynamic Schedule Jump to: navigation, search Dictionary.png Dynamic Interchange Schedule Or Dynamic Schedule A telemetered reading or value that is updated in real time and used as a schedule in the AGC/ACE equation and the integrated value of which is treated as a schedule for interchange accounting purposes. Commonly used for scheduling jointly owned generation to or from another Balancing Authority Area.[1] Related Terms balancing authority, balancing authority area, smart grid References ↑ Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards An in LikeLike UnlikeLike You like this.Sign Up to see what your friends like. line Glossary Definition Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Definition:Dynamic_Interchange_Schedule_Or_Dynamic_Schedule&oldid=502492

210

2014 CAMD Users Meeting Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Schedule Friday, April 25th, 2014 LTRC Transportation Training and Education Center (TTEC), 4099 Gourrier Avenue Printable Schedule here 8:00 - 8:30 - REGISTRATION Morning Session...

211

Reclaimer Scheduling: Complexity and Algorithms  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Feb 17, 2014 ... Abstract: We study a number of variants of an abstract scheduling problem inspired by the scheduling of reclaimers in the stockyard of a coal...

Enrico Angelelli

2014-02-17T23:59:59.000Z

212

FUEL CYCLE POTENTIAL WASTE FOR DISPOSITION  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States (U.S.) currently utilizes a once-through fuel cycle where used nuclear fuel (UNF) is stored on-site in either wet pools or in dry storage systems with ultimate disposal in a deep mined geologic repository envisioned. Within the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), the Fuel Cycle Research and Development Program (FCR&D) develops options to the current commercial fuel cycle management strategy to enable the safe, secure, economic, and sustainable expansion of nuclear energy while minimizing proliferation risks by conducting research and development of advanced fuel cycles, including modified open and closed cycles. The safe management and disposition of used nuclear fuel and/or nuclear waste is a fundamental aspect of any nuclear fuel cycle. Yet, the routine disposal of used nuclear fuel and radioactive waste remains problematic. Advanced fuel cycles will generate different quantities and forms of waste than the current LWR fleet. This study analyzes the quantities and characteristics of potential waste forms including differing waste matrices, as a function of a variety of potential fuel cycle alternatives including: (1) Commercial UNF generated by uranium fuel light water reactors (LWR). Four once through fuel cycles analyzed in this study differ by varying the assumed expansion/contraction of nuclear power in the U.S. (2) Four alternative LWR used fuel recycling processes analyzed differ in the reprocessing method (aqueous vs. electro-chemical), complexity (Pu only or full transuranic (TRU) recovery) and waste forms generated. (3) Used Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuel derived from the recovered Pu utilizing a single reactor pass. (4) Potential waste forms generated by the reprocessing of fuels derived from recovered TRU utilizing multiple reactor passes.

Carter, J.

2011-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

213

FUEL CYCLE POTENTIAL WASTE FOR DISPOSITION  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States (U.S.) currently utilizes a once-through fuel cycle where used nuclear fuel (UNF) is stored on-site in either wet pools or in dry storage systems with ultimate disposal in a deep mined geologic repository envisioned. Within the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), the Fuel Cycle Research and Development Program (FCR&D) develops options to the current commercial fuel cycle management strategy to enable the safe, secure, economic, and sustainable expansion of nuclear energy while minimizing proliferation risks by conducting research and development of advanced fuel cycles, including modified open and closed cycles. The safe management and disposition of used nuclear fuel and/or nuclear waste is a fundamental aspect of any nuclear fuel cycle. Yet, the routine disposal of used nuclear fuel and radioactive waste remains problematic. Advanced fuel cycles will generate different quantities and forms of waste than the current LWR fleet. This study analyzes the quantities and characteristics of potential waste forms including differing waste matrices, as a function of a variety of potential fuel cycle alternatives including: (1) Commercial UNF generated by uranium fuel light water reactors (LWR). Four once through fuel cycles analyzed in this study differ by varying the assumed expansion/contraction of nuclear power in the U.S; (2) Four alternative LWR used fuel recycling processes analyzed differ in the reprocessing method (aqueous vs. electro-chemical), complexity (Pu only or full transuranic (TRU) recovery) and waste forms generated; (3) Used Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuel derived from the recovered Pu utilizing a single reactor pass; and (4) Potential waste forms generated by the reprocessing of fuels derived from recovered TRU utilizing multiple reactor passes.

Jones, R.; Carter, J.

2010-10-13T23:59:59.000Z

214

A model for life cycle records management  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary objective of this paper is to update an old Records Management concept; the management of records according to the records life cycle. Accordingly, the authors are presenting a new version of the Records Management life cycle model and its associated elements. The basic concept is that every record progresses through three phases; a record is created, is used and maintained, and dispositioned. In this presentation, the authors update the very old straight line model and the more current circular model with a new model that essentially combines the two. The model portrays Records Management as having a distinct straight-line beginning, a circular use and maintenance phase, and a distinct straight-line end. The presentation maps Records Management Program elements and activities against the phases depicted in the model. The authors believe that this new records life cycle model is an enhanced physical representation of the process. This presentation is designed to help put all of the specialized Records Management topics that participants have heard about during the conference in the perspective of the records life cycle.

Tayfun, A.C.; Gibson, S.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

Vital Records  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order establishes Department-wide requirements, roles and responsibilities for implementing and maintaining a Vital Records program as required by the Federal Records Act in support of the DOE Continuation of Operations Plan. No cancellations.

2006-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

216

Implementing Lottery Scheduling: Matching the Specializations Traditional Schedulers  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in traditional non­ real time process schedulers. Lottery scheduling enables flexible control over relative. We achieve this while maintaining lottery scheduling's flexible control over relative execution rates a recently troduced proportional­share scheduler that enables flexible control over relative rates which CPU

217

EA-1488: Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition, Medical  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

488: Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition, 488: Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition, Medical Isotope Production, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee EA-1488: Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition, Medical Isotope Production, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee The purpose of the proposed action evaluated in this environmental assessment (EA) is the processing of uranium-233 (233U) stored at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and other small quantities of similar material currently stored at other U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites in order to render it suitable for safe, long-term, economical storage. The 233U is stored within Bldg. 3019A, which is part of the Bldg. 3019

218

EM Makes Significant Progress on Dispositioning Transuranic Waste at Idaho  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM Makes Significant Progress on Dispositioning Transuranic Waste EM Makes Significant Progress on Dispositioning Transuranic Waste at Idaho Site EM Makes Significant Progress on Dispositioning Transuranic Waste at Idaho Site December 24, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Workers treat sludge-bearing, transuranic waste from the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. Workers treat sludge-bearing, transuranic waste from the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. A tank at the Materials and Fuels Complex containing residual sodium is moved prior to waste treatment. A tank at the Materials and Fuels Complex containing residual sodium is moved prior to waste treatment. Distillation equipment is shown prior to transport to the Idaho site. Distillation equipment is shown prior to transport to the Idaho site. In these 2010 photographs, unexploded ordnance were collected and then detonated onsite at the Mass Detonation Area.

219

EA-1290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium 290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium EA-1290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to transport up to an average of 9,000 metric tons per year of natural uranium as uranium hexafluoride (UF6) from the United States to the Russian Federation. This amount of uranium is equivalent to 13,3000 metric tons of UF6. The EA also examines the impacts of this action on the global commons. Transfer of natural UF6 to the Russian Federation is part of a joint U.S./Russian program to dispose of highly enriched uranium (HEU) from dismantled Russian nuclear weapons. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

220

EA-1599: Disposition of Radioactively Contaminated Nickel Located at the  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

99: Disposition of Radioactively Contaminated Nickel Located 99: Disposition of Radioactively Contaminated Nickel Located at the East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Paducah, Kentucky, for Controlled Radiological Applications EA-1599: Disposition of Radioactively Contaminated Nickel Located at the East Tennessee Technology Park, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Paducah, Kentucky, for Controlled Radiological Applications Summary This EA was being prepared to evaluate potential environmental impacts of a proposal to dispose of nickel scrap that is volumetrically contaminated with radioactive materials and that DOE recovered from equipment it had used in uranium enrichment. This EA is on hold. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities at this time.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Savannah River Site Achieves Transuranic Waste Disposition Goal in 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Site Achieves Transuranic Waste Disposition Goal in Savannah River Site Achieves Transuranic Waste Disposition Goal in 2013 Savannah River Site Achieves Transuranic Waste Disposition Goal in 2013 December 24, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Workers gather behind a “Safety and Security begins with Me” banner at the Savannah River Site. Workers gather behind a "Safety and Security begins with Me" banner at the Savannah River Site. Workers sort through transuranic waste at the Savannah River Site. Workers sort through transuranic waste at the Savannah River Site. SRR employees Glenn Kelly and Fred Merriweather pour the final amount of grout into Tank 6. SRR employees Glenn Kelly and Fred Merriweather pour the final amount of grout into Tank 6. Workers gather behind a "Safety and Security begins with Me" banner at the Savannah River Site.

222

EM Makes Significant Progress on Dispositioning Transuranic Waste at Idaho  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM Makes Significant Progress on Dispositioning Transuranic Waste EM Makes Significant Progress on Dispositioning Transuranic Waste at Idaho Site EM Makes Significant Progress on Dispositioning Transuranic Waste at Idaho Site December 24, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Workers treat sludge-bearing, transuranic waste from the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. Workers treat sludge-bearing, transuranic waste from the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project. A tank at the Materials and Fuels Complex containing residual sodium is moved prior to waste treatment. A tank at the Materials and Fuels Complex containing residual sodium is moved prior to waste treatment. Distillation equipment is shown prior to transport to the Idaho site. Distillation equipment is shown prior to transport to the Idaho site. In these 2010 photographs, unexploded ordnance were collected and then detonated onsite at the Mass Detonation Area.

223

Used Fuel Disposition Research & Development | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Used Fuel Disposition Used Fuel Disposition Research & Development Used Fuel Disposition Research & Development A typical spent nuclear fuel cask sitting on a railcar. Since the early 1960s, the United States has safely conducted more than 3,000 shipments of used nuclear fuel without any harmful release of radioactive material. A typical spent nuclear fuel cask sitting on a railcar. Since the early 1960s, the United States has safely conducted more than 3,000 shipments of used nuclear fuel without any harmful release of radioactive material. In order to assure the development of a sustainable nuclear fuel cycle for the nation's energy future, to provide a sound technical basis for implementation of a new national policy for managing the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle, and to better understand, assess, and communicate the

224

Disposition of DOE Excess Depleted Uranium, Natural Uranium, and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Disposition of DOE Excess Depleted Uranium, Natural Uranium, and Disposition of DOE Excess Depleted Uranium, Natural Uranium, and Low-Enriched Uranium Disposition of DOE Excess Depleted Uranium, Natural Uranium, and Low-Enriched Uranium The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) owns and manages an inventory of depleted uranium (DU), natural uranium (NU), and low-enriched uranium (LEU) that is currently stored in large cylinders as depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF6), natural uranium hexafluoride (NUF6), and low-enriched uranium hexafluoride (LEUF6) at the DOE Paducah site in western Kentucky (DOE Paducah) and the DOE Portsmouth site near Piketon in south-central Ohio (DOE Portsmouth)1. This inventory exceeds DOE's current and projected energy and defense program needs. On March 11, 2008, the Secretary of Energy issued a policy statement (the

225

Paducah Demolition Debris Shipped for Disposition | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Demolition Debris Shipped for Disposition Demolition Debris Shipped for Disposition Paducah Demolition Debris Shipped for Disposition August 27, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis The first five-car section of demolition debris from the C-340 Metals Plant leaves July 15 from the Paducah site. The first five-car section of demolition debris from the C-340 Metals Plant leaves July 15 from the Paducah site. A P&L locomotive travels near Woodville Road, south of the Paducah site, with the waste shipment in tow. A P&L locomotive travels near Woodville Road, south of the Paducah site, with the waste shipment in tow. The first five-car section of demolition debris from the C-340 Metals Plant leaves July 15 from the Paducah site. A P&L locomotive travels near Woodville Road, south of the Paducah site, with the waste shipment in tow.

226

LANL MOX fuel lead assemblies data report for the surplus plutonium disposition environmental impact statement  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to support the US Department of Energy (DOE) Fissile Materials Disposition Program`s preparation of the draft surplus plutonium disposition environmental impact statement. This is one of several responses to data call requests for background information on activities associated with the operation of the lead assembly (LA) mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility. LANL has proposed an LA MOX fuel fabrication approach that would be done entirely inside an S and S Category 1 area. This includes receipt and storage of PuO{sub 2} powder, fabrication of MOX fuel pellets, assembly of fuel rods and bundles, and shipping of the packaged fuel to a commercial reactor site. Support activities will take place within both Category 1 and 2 areas. Technical Area (TA) 55/Plutonium Facility 4 will be used to store the bulk PuO{sub 2} powder, fabricate MOX fuel pellets, assemble rods, and store fuel bundles. Bundles will be assembled at a separate facility, several of which have been identified as suitable for that activity. The Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building (at TA-3) will be used for analytical chemistry support. Waste operations will be conducted in TA-50 and TA-54. Only very minor modifications will be needed to accommodate the LA program. These modifications consist mostly of minor equipment upgrades. A commercial reactor operator has not been identified for the LA irradiation. Postirradiation examination (PIE) of the irradiated fuel will take place at either Oak Ridge National Laboratory or ANL-W. The only modifications required at either PIE site would be to accommodate full-length irradiated fuel rods. Results from this program are critical to the overall plutonium distribution schedule.

Fisher, S.E.; Holdaway, R.; Ludwig, S.B. [and others

1998-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Engineering evaluation of alternatives for the disposition of Niagara Falls Storage Site, its residues and wastes  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The final disposition scenarios selected by DOE for assessment in this document are consistent with those stated in the Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) (DOE, 1983d) and the modifications to the alternatives resulting from the public scoping process. The scenarios are: take no action beyond interim remedial measures other than maintenance and surveillance of the NFSS; retain and manage the NFSS as a long-term waste management facility for the wastes and residues on the site; decontaminate, certify, and release the NFSS for other use, with long-term management of the wastes and residues at other DOE sites; and partially decontaminate the NFSS by removal and transport off site of only the more radioactive residues, and upgrade containment of the remaining wastes and residues on site. The objective of this document is to present to DOE the conceptual engineering, occupational radiation exposure, construction schedule, maintenance and surveillance requirements, and cost information relevant to design and implementation of each of the four scenarios. The specific alternatives within each scenario used as the basis for discussion in this document were evaluated on the bases of engineering considerations, technical feasibility, and regulatory requirements. Selected alternatives determined to be acceptable for each of the four final disposition scenarios for the NFSS were approved by DOE to be assessed and costed in this document. These alternatives are also the subject of the EIS for the NFSS currently being prepared by Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). 40 figures, 38 tables.

Not Available

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Symmetry in Scheduling Problems  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nov 16, 2010 ... one is determining production schedules for identical machines. ...... j(t)) gives the cost of generator j producing pj(t) units of electricity at time t.

2010-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

229

Fissile material disposition program final immobilization form assessment and recommendation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), in its role as the lead laboratory for the development of plutonium immobilization technologies for the Department of Energy`s Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (MD), has been requested by MD to recommend an immobilization technology for the disposition of surplus weapons- usable plutonium. The recommendation and supporting documentation was requested to be provided by September 1, 1997. This report addresses the choice between glass and ceramic technologies for immobilizing plutonium using the can-in-canister approach. Its purpose is to provide a comparative evaluation of the two candidate technologies and to recommend a form based on technical considerations.

Cochran, S.G.; Dunlop, W.H.; Edmunds, T.A.; MacLean, L.M.; Gould, T.H. [Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States)

1997-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

230

DOE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL REPORTS  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Record Disposition Schedule items listed below are have been consolidated from DOE Records Schedules previously approved over the last 35 years. They apply specifically to those scientific and...

231

NEPA Cases Filed in 2010 2010 NEPA Case Dispositions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Filed in 2010 2010 NEPA Case Dispositions Filed in 2010 2010 NEPA Case Dispositions Lead Defendant Cases Filed Injunctions - Remands Judgment for defendant 46 ARMY-USACE 6 3 Dismissal w/o settlement 11 DHS-USCG 0 0 Settlement 8 DOD 1 0 Adverse dispositions: 17 DOE-Energy 0 0 TRO 0 DOE-FERC 0 0 Preliminary Injunction 5 DOE-NNSA 1 0 Permanent Injunction 4 DOI-BIA 1 0 Remand 8 DOI-BLM 17 5 DOI-BOEM 5 0 Basis for 2010 NEPA Dispositions DOI-BOR 0 0 Jurisdictional - P prevailed 0 DOI-FWS 6 1 Jurisdictional - D prevailed 12 DOI-OSM 0 1 NEPA - Not required 1 DOI-NPS 2 2 NEPA - Is required 2 DOJ 0 0 CE - Adequate 4 DOS 0 0 CE - Not Adequate 1 DOT-FAA 3 0 EA - Adequate* 11 DOT-FHWA 10 1 EA - Not Adequate* 5 DOT-FTA 2 0 EIS - Adequate* 17 EPA 1 0 EIS - Not Adequate* 5

232

MINIMIZING WASTE AND COST IN DISPOSITION OF LEGACY RESIDUES  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Research is being conducted at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) which is directed toward development of a quantitative basis for disposition of actinide-bearing process residues (both legacy residues and residues generated from ongoing programmatic operations). This research is focused in two directions: (1) identifying minimum negative consequence (waste, dose, cost) dispositions working within regulatory safeguards termination criteria, and (2) evaluating logistics/consequences of across-the-board residue discards such as authorized at Rocky Flats under a safeguards termination variance. The first approach emphasizes Laboratory commitments to environmental stewardship, worker safety, and fiscal responsibility. This approach has been described as the Plutonium Disposition Methodology (PDM) in deference to direction provided by DOE Albuquerque. The second approach is born of the need to expedite removal of residues from storage for programmatic and reasons and residue storage safety concerns. Any disposition path selected must preserve the legal distinction between residues as Special Nuclear Material (SNM) and discardable materials as waste in order to insure the continuing viability of Laboratory plutonium processing facilities for national security operations.

J. BALKEY; M. ROBINSON

2001-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

JGI - CSP Proposal Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Proposal Schedule Proposal Schedule CSP | Overview | How to Propose a Project | Review Process | DOE Relevance Proposal Schedule | FAQ Small-scale Microbial/Metagenome Proposals - reviewed twice yearly Small-scale proposals for specific types of microbial and metagenome projects are accepted on a continuous basis and will be reviewed twice a year. Letters of intent are not required. Deadline for submission is 60 days prior to the review date. Next review dates (submission deadline in parentheses): January 2014 (Nov 22, 2013) July 2014 (May 23, 2014) Submit small-scale microbial/metagenome proposals anytime using the Work Initiation Process (WIP) interface. Synthetic Biology proposals Synthetic biology proposals are accepted on a continuous basis and will be reviewed twice a year. Letters of intent are not required. Deadline for

234

SRS CAB - Meeting Schedules  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SRS CAB Meeting Schedule SRS CAB Meeting Schedule Savannah River Site - Citizens Advisory Board 2013 Schedule To join current Online Meetings or view archived Online Meetings click on the buttons in the right-hand column. CAB Full Board and Combined Committees Meetings are not presented in the Online Meeting format. Instructions for Accessing Committee Meetings Online To request a copy of an archived online meeting, scroll down to the date of the meeting you wish to request, and click on the green "Request Archived Online Meeting" button. Your email browser will open and generate a new email to srscitizensadvisoryboard@srs.gov with the committee meeting you wish to request in the subject line. Please, include your name and mailing address in the body of the email. Once we receive the email, we will send

235

NERSC Holiday Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NERSC NERSC Holiday Schedule NERSC Holiday Schedule December 20, 2013 by Francesca Verdier (0 Comments) All NERSC computing and storage systems will remain in full operation throughout the holiday season (Tuesday December 24 through Wednesday January 1). From Tuesday December 24 through Wednesday January 1, NERSC Consulting and Account Support services will be available *only* on Friday December 27 and Monday December 30, from 8:00 to 5:00 Pacific Time. Normal Consulting and Account Support schedules will resume on Thursday, January 2. As always, critical system problems may be reported at any time to NERSC Operations at 1-800-666-3772, menu option 1, or 1-510-486-6821. You should also contact Operations if you need to have your password reset (or login failures cleared) over the holidays.

236

EGov PMA Scorecard Cost, Schedule & Performance Standard...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

EGov PMA Scorecard Cost, Schedule & Performance Standard.tif EGov PMA Scorecard Cost, Schedule & Performance Standard.tif EGov PMA Scorecard Cost, Schedule &...

237

Project Scheduling (3) Corequisite  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) CMGT 111 Construction Materials & Methods Lab (1) CMGT 460 Project Cost Controls (3) FA SP CMGT 320 FASYMBOLS CMGT 417 Project Scheduling (3) Corequisite Offered FALL Only CMGT 240 Intro) CMGT 475 Construction Project Management (3) MATH 108 College Algebra (4) Construction Elective

Barrash, Warren

238

Project Scheduling (3) Corequisite  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

460 Project Cost Controls (3) FA SP FA CE 210/211 Surveying & Lab (3) CMGT 410 Concrete FormworkSYMBOLS CMGT 417 Project Scheduling (3) Corequisite Offered FALL Only CMGT 240 Intro Construction Project Management (3) MATH 108 College Algebra (4) MGMT 301 Leadership Skills (3) ENGL 101

Barrash, Warren

239

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3: 3: PROCUREMENT, SUPPLY, AND GRANT RECORDS July 2008 Revision 2 Procurement and supply records document the acquisition of goods and non-personal services, controlling the volume of stock on hand, reporting procurement needs, and related supply matters which are part of daily procurement operations. The basic procurement files reflect a considerable range of procedure, from simple, small purchases to complicated prime contractor and subcontractor operations. Any records created prior to 1895 must first be offered to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for appraisal before applying the disposal instructions. Frequently copies of procurement papers become integral parts of other files, such as project files of various types or general subject files pertaining to program operations;

240

TOWARDS UNIFYING DATABASE SCHEDULING AND  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 TOWARDS UNIFYING DATABASE SCHEDULING AND CONCURRENCY CONTROL: A FRONTIER APPROACH Gregory Jones previous work in real-time database concurrency control indexconcur- rency control and scheduling has focused on combiningvariations of traditional concurrency control techniques with real-time scheduling

Rhode Island, University of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

DOE plutonium disposition study: Analysis of existing ABB-CE Light Water Reactors for the disposition of weapons-grade plutonium. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Core reactivity and basic fuel management calculations were conducted on the selected reactors (with emphasis on the System 80 units as being the most desirable choice). Methods used were identical to those reported in the Evolutionary Reactor Report. From these calculations, the basic mission capability was assessed. The selected reactors were studied for modification, such as the addition of control rod nozzles to increase rod worth, and internals and control system modifications that might also be needed. Other system modifications studied included the use of enriched boric acid as soluble poison, and examination of the fuel pool capacities. The basic geometry and mechanical characteristics, materials and fabrication techniques of the fuel assemblies for the selected existing reactors are the same as for System 80+. There will be some differences in plutonium loading, according to the ability of the reactors to load MOX fuel. These differences are not expected to affect licensability or EPA requirements. Therefore, the fuel technology and fuel qualification sections provided in the Evolutionary Reactor Report apply to the existing reactors. An additional factor, in that the existing reactor availability presupposes the use of that reactor for the irradiation of Lead Test Assemblies, is discussed. The reactor operating and facility licenses for the operating plants were reviewed. Licensing strategies for each selected reactor were identified. The spent fuel pool for the selected reactors (Palo Verde) was reviewed for capacity and upgrade requirements. Reactor waste streams were identified and assessed in comparison to uranium fuel operations. Cost assessments and schedules for converting to plutonium disposition were estimated for some of the major modification items. Economic factors (incremental costs associated with using weapons plutonium) were listed and where possible under the scope of work, estimates were made.

Not Available

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Disposal Research and Development Disposal Research and Development Roadmap Rev. 01 Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap Rev. 01 The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology (OFCT) has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct the research and development (R&D) activities related to storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and high level nuclear waste (HLW) generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The disposal of SNF and HLW in a range of geologic media has been investigated internationally. Considerable progress has been made in the U.S and other nations, but gaps in knowledge still exist. This document provides an evaluation and prioritization of R&D opportunities

243

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign International Activities Implementation Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

International Activities International Activities Implementation Plan Used Fuel Disposition Campaign International Activities Implementation Plan The management of used nuclear fuel and nuclear waste is required for any country using nuclear energy. This includes the storage, transportation, and disposal of low and intermediate level waste (LILW), used nuclear fuel (UNF), and high level waste (HLW). The Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC), within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology (FCT), is responsible for conducting research and development pertaining to the management of these materials in the U.S. Cooperation and collaboration with other countries would be beneficial to both the U.S. and other countries through

244

Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Disposal Research and Development Disposal Research and Development Roadmap Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology (OFCT) has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct the research and development (R&D) activities related to storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and high level nuclear waste (HLW). The Mission of the UFDC is To identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The U.S. has, for the past twenty-plus years, focused efforts on disposing

245

Microsoft PowerPoint - REVWaste_Disposition_Update.061411.pptx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Materials and Disposition Update Materials and Disposition Update Environmental Management Site-Specific www.em.doe.gov 1 Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board Chairs' Meeting June 15, 2011 Shirley J. Olinger EM Associate Principal Deputy for Corporate Operations DOE's Waste Management Priorities Continue to manage waste inventories in a safe and compliant manner. Address high risk waste in a cost- effective manner. Maintain and optimize current disposal capability for future generations. www.em.doe.gov 2 Develop future disposal capacity in a complex environment. Promote the development of treatment and disposal alternatives in the commercial sector. Review current policies and directives and provide needed oversight. Completed Legacy TRU Sites Teledyne-Brown ARCO Energy Technology Engineering Center

246

Update of the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Implementation Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Campaign Implementation Plan provides summary level detail describing how the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) supports achievement of the overarching mission and objectives of the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Fuel Cycle Technologies Program The implementation plan begins with the assumption of target dates that are set out in the January 2013 DOE Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste (http://energy.gov/downloads/strategy-management-and-disposal-used-nuclear-fuel-and-high-level-radioactive-waste). These target dates and goals are summarized in section III. This implementation plan will be maintained as a living document and will be updated as needed in response to progress in the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign and the Fuel Cycle Technologies Program.

Jens Birkholzer; Robert MacKinnon; Kevin McMahon; Sylvia Saltzstein; Ken Sorenson; Peter Swift

2014-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

Optimal Power Schedule for Distributed MIMO Links  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

an integration of link scheduling and power control for MIMOmedium access control, space-time power scheduling. Fig. 1.

Rong, Yue; Hua, Yingbo

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

248

Preliminary siting characterization Salt Disposition Facility - Site B  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A siting and reconnaissance geotechnical program has been completed in S-Area at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina. This program investigated the subsurface conditions for the area known as ``Salt Disposition Facility (SDF), Site B'' located northeast of H-Area and within the S-Area. Data acquired from the Site B investigation includes both field exploration and laboratory test data.

Wyatt, D.

2000-01-04T23:59:59.000Z

249

Accelerating the disposition of transuranic waste from LANL - 9495  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) was established during World War II with a single mission -- to design and build an atomic bomb. In the 65 years since, nuclear weapons physics, design and engineering have been the Laboratory's primary and sustaining mission. Experimental and process operations -- and associated cleanout and upgrade activities -- have generated a significant inventory of transuranic (TRU) waste that is stored at LANL's Technical Area 54, Material Disposal Area G (MDA G). When the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) opened its doors in 1999, LANL's TRU inventory totaled about 10,200 m{sup 3}, with a plutonium 239-equivalent curie (PE Ci) content of approximately 250,000 curies. By December 2008, a total of about 2,300 m3 (61,000 PE Ci) had been shipped to WIPP from LANL. This has resulted in a net reduction of about 1,000 m{sup 3} of TRU inventory over that time frame. This paper presents progress in dispositioning legacy and newly-generated transuranic waste (TRU) from ongoing missions at the LANL. The plans for, and lessons learned, in dispositioning several hundred high-activity TRU waste drums are reviewed. This waste population was one of the highest risks at LANL. Technical challenges in disposition of the high-activity drums are presented. These provide a preview of challenges to be addressed in dispositioning the remaining 6,800 m{sup 3} of TRU stored above ground and 2,400 m{sup 3} of TRU waste that is 'retrievably' stored below-grade. LANL is using subcontractors for much of this work and has formed a strong partnership with WIPP and its contractor to address this cleanup challenge.

Shepard, Mark D [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Stiger, Susan G [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Blankenhorn, James A [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Rael, George J [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Moody, David C [U.S DOE

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Amended Record of Decision for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program (4/19/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

432 432 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 76 / Friday, April 19, 2002 / Notices Publisher: The test publisher and the address, contact person, telephone, and fax number of the test publisher are: CTB/McGraw-Hill, 20 Ryan Ranch Road, Monterey, California 93940- 5703, Contact: Ms. Veronika Henderson, Telephone: (831) 393- 7363, Fax: (831) 393-7142. 7. Wonderlic Basic Skills Test (WBST)- Verbal Forms VS-1 & VS-2, Quantitative Forms QS-1 & QS-2 Passing scores: The approved passing scores on this test are as follows: Verbal (200) and Quantitative (210). Publisher: The test publisher and the address, contact person, telephone, and fax number of the test publisher are: Wonderlic Personnel Test, Inc., 1509 N. Milwaukee Ave., Libertyville, IL 60048-1380, Contact: Mr. Victor S.

251

Record of Decision for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

08 08 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2000 / Notices 1 A nuclear weapon component. 2 A physical blend of uranium oxide and plutonium oxide. Staff Attorney, Entergy Power Marketing Corp., 10055 Grogan's Mill Road, Suite 500, The Woodlands, TX 77380. Comments on Solutions' request to export should be clearly marked with Docket EA-155-A. Additional copies are to be filed directly with: Richard Staines, Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., 701 Westchester Avenue, Suite 320E, White Plaines, NY 10604; and Steven J. Ross, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036. Comments on DETM's request to export should be clearly marked with Docket EA-163-A. Additional copies are to be filed directly with: Kris Errickson, Legal/Regulatory

252

Processing and Disposition of Special Actinide Target Materials - 13138  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) manages an inventory of materials that contains a range of long-lived radioactive isotopes that were produced from the 1960's through the 1980's by irradiating targets in high-flux reactors at the Savannah River Site (SRS) to produce special heavy isotopes for DOE programmatic use, scientific research, and industrial and medical applications. Among the products were californium-252, heavy curium (including Cm-246 through Cm-248), and plutonium-242 and -244. Many of the isotopes are still in demand today, and they can be recovered from the remaining targets previously irradiated at SRS or produced from the recovered isotopes. Should the existing target materials be discarded, the plutonium (Pu) and curium (Cm) isotopes cannot be replaced readily with existing production sources. Some of these targets are stored at SRS, while other target material is stored at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) at several stages of processing. The materials cannot be stored in their present form indefinitely. Their long-term management involves processing items for beneficial use and/or for disposition, using storage and process facilities at SRS and ORNL. Evaluations are under way for disposition options for these materials, and demonstrations of improved flow sheets to process the materials are being conducted at ORNL and the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). The disposition options and a management evaluation process have been developed. Processing demonstrations and evaluations for these unique materials are under way. (authors)

Robinson, Sharon M.; Patton, Brad D. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (United States)] [Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (United States); Allender, Jeffrey S. [Savannah River National Laboratory (United States)] [Savannah River National Laboratory (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

APS Long Range Operations Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Shutdown Planning Shutdown Planning Planning Templates Shutdown Planning Schedules: Current Shutdown Schedule Archives: 2006 - 2013 APS Long-Range Operations Schedule: 2014 Archives: 2013 | 2012 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 APS Long-Range Operations Schedule (Fiscal Year 2014) Alternate Formats: iCal | Excel | PDF APS Long-Range Operation Schedule 2013-3 2014-1 2014-2 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

254

Transportation Baseline Schedule  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 1999 National Transportation Program - Transportation Baseline Report presents data that form a baseline to enable analysis and planning for future Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) waste/material transportation. The companion 1999 Transportation Barriers Analysis analyzes the data and identifies existing and potential problems that may prevent or delay transportation activities based on the data presented. The 1999 Transportation Baseline Schedule (this report) uses the same data to provide an overview of the transportation activities of DOE EM waste/materials. This report can be used to identify areas where stakeholder interface is needed, and to communicate to stakeholders the quantity/schedule of shipments going through their area. Potential bottlenecks in the transportation system can be identified; the number of packages needed, and the capacity needed at receiving facilities can be planned. This report offers a visualization of baseline DOE EM transportation activities for the 11 major sites and the Geologic Repository Disposal site (GRD).

Fawcett, Ricky Lee; John, Mark Earl

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

BNL | ATF Beam Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Beam Schedule (pdf) Beam Schedule (pdf) Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 22 1/2 Holiday Holiday 28 January Holiday 4 5 Maintenance 11 12 Maintenance 18 19 Holiday AE52 - DWFA (Euclid), BL2 25 February AE52 - DWFA (Euclid), BL2 1 2 AE50 - PWFA in QNR (UCLA), BL2 8 9 AE50 - PWFA in QNR (UCLA), BL2 15 16 Holiday AE50 - PWFA in QNR (UCLA), BL2 22 March 1 2 AE53 - Nonlinear Compton (UCLA) 8 9 AE53 - Nonlinear Compton (UCLA) 15 16 AE53 - Nonlinear Compton (UCLA) 22 23 29 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday User operations (E-beam in use) Ions - Ion generation User operations (laser in use) PWFA - Plasma Wakefield Acceleration User operations (E-beam and laser in use)

256

Update to the Fissile Materials Disposition program SST/SGT transportation estimation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is an update to ``Fissile Materials Disposition Program SST/SGT Transportation Estimation,'' SAND98-8244, June 1998. The Department of Energy Office of Fissile Materials Disposition requested this update as a basis for providing the public with an updated estimation of the number of transportation loads, load miles, and costs associated with the preferred alternative in the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

John Didlake

1999-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

257

1993 Wholesale Power and Transmission Rate Schedules.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration 1993 Wholesale Power Rate Schedules and General Rate Schedule Provisions and 1993 Transmission Rate Schedules and General Transmission Rate Schedule Provisions, contained herein, were approved on an interim basis effective October 1, 1993. These rate schedules and provisions were approved by the Federal Energy Commission, United States Department of Energy, in September, 1993. These rate schedules and provisions supersede the Administration`s Wholesale Power Rate Schedules and General Rate Schedule Provisions and Transmission Rate Schedules and General Transmission Rate Schedule Provisions effective October 1, 1991.

US Bonneville Power Administration

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

Microsoft Word - CX-MountainAvenueDispositionFY12_WEB.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Joan Kendall Realty Specialist - TERR-3 Proposed Action: Disposition of Mountain Avenue Substation and...

259

2007 Wholesale Power Rate Schedules : 2007 General Rate Schedule Provisions.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This schedule is available for the contract purchase of Firm Power to be used within the Pacific Northwest (PNW). Priority Firm (PF) Power may be purchased by public bodies, cooperatives, and Federal agencies for resale to ultimate consumers, for direct consumption, and for Construction, Test and Start-Up, and Station Service. Rates in this schedule are in effect beginning October 1, 2006, and apply to purchases under requirements Firm Power sales contracts for a three-year period. The Slice Product is only available for public bodies and cooperatives who have signed Slice contracts for the FY 2002-2011 period. Utilities participating in the Residential Exchange Program (REP) under Section 5(c) of the Northwest Power Act may purchase Priority Firm Power pursuant to the Residential Exchange Program. Rates under contracts that contain charges that escalate based on BPA's Priority Firm Power rates shall be based on the three-year rates listed in this rate schedule in addition to applicable transmission charges. This rate schedule supersedes the PF-02 rate schedule, which went into effect October 1, 2001. Sales under the PF-07 rate schedule are subject to BPA's 2007 General Rate Schedule Provisions (2007 GRSPs). Products available under this rate schedule are defined in the 2007 GRSPs. For sales under this rate schedule, bills shall be rendered and payments due pursuant to BPA's 2007 GRSPs and billing process.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

2006-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

Rate Schedules | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rate Schedules Rate Schedules Rate Schedules One of the major responsibilities of Southeastern is to design, formulate, and justify rate schedules. Repayment studies prepared by the agency determine revenue requirements and appropriate rate levels and these studies for each of Southeastern's four power marketing systems are updated annually. They demonstrate the adequacy of the rates for each system. Rates are considered to be adequate when revenues are sufficient to repay all costs associated with power production and transmission costs, which include the amortization of the Federal investment allocated to power. Latest Rate Schedules October 1, 2012 ALA-1-N Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: PowerSouth Energy Cooperative System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Chemotherapy Operations Planning and Scheduling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Feb 12, 2010 ... ning and scheduling methods for chemotherapy patients with the ... growth, control or prevent the spread of cancer cells, and/or relieve cancer...

2010-02-13T23:59:59.000Z

262

Construction Schedule | Advanced Photon Source  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Construction Schedule Current Projects 27-ID and 35-ID APS Vibration Reporting Protocol Summary of Construction Equipment Tests and Activities Jan 2014 Past Projects APCF LOM438...

263

Sound propagation in urban areas: A periodic disposition of buildings  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A numerical simulation of background noise propagation is performed for a network of hexagonal buildings. The obtained results suggest that the prediction of background noise in urban spaces is possible by means of a modified diffusion equation using two parameters: the diffusion coefficient that expresses the spreading out of noise resulting from diffuse scattering and multiple reflections by buildings, and an attenuation term accounting for the wall absorption, atmospheric attenuation, and absorption by the open top. The dependence of the diffusion coefficient with geometrical shapes and the diffusive nature of the buildings are investigated in the case of a periodic disposition of hexagonal buildings.

J. Picaut; J. Hardy; L. Simon

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

Abstract 4241: Preclinical studies of brain/brain tumor disposition and antitumor efficacy of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...San Diego, CA Abstract 4241: Preclinical studies of brain/brain tumor disposition and antitumor efficacy of the aromatase...target for the treatment of CNS malignancies, as well as brain disposition and anti-tumor efficacy of letrozole, an...

Nimita Dave; Pankaj B. Desai; Gary A. Gudelsky; Kathleen LaSance; Lionel M.L. Chow; Xiaoyang Qi

2014-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

Green Scheduling: Scheduling of Control Systems for Peak Power Reduction  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

approach to fine-grained coordination of energy demand by scheduling energy consuming control systems of the system variables only, control system execution (i.e. when energy is supplied to the system-Scheduling; Energy Systems; Peak Power Reduction; Load Balancing; I. INTRODUCTION During a major sporting event

Pappas, George J.

266

Implementation Guide for Surveillance and Maintenance during Facility Transition and Disposition  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

As DOE facilities complete mission operations and are declared excess, they pass into a transition phase that ultimately prepares them for disposition. The disposition phase of a facility's life cycle usually includes deactivation, decommissioning, and surveillance and maintenance (S&M) activities.

1999-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

267

Fisetin disposition and metabolism in mice: Identification of geraldol as an active metabolite  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Fisetin disposition and metabolism in mice: Identification of geraldol as an active metabolite title: Fisetin disposition and metabolism in mice ** Corresponding author: Dr. Guy G. Chabot, Chemical-yl)-3,5-diphenyltetrazolium; PBS, phosphate buffered saline. Keywords: flavonoid, fisetin

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

268

EIS-0287: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement, EIS-0287 (September 2002) EIS-0287: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement, EIS-0287 (September 2002) This EIS analyzes the potential environmental consequences of alternatives for managing high-level waste (HLW) calcine, mixed transuranic waste/sodium bearing waste (SBW) and newly generated liquid waste at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) in liquid and solid forms. This EIS also analyzes alternatives for the final disposition of HLW management facilities at the INEEL after their missions are completed. Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement, DOE/EIS-0287 (September 2002)

269

Consent Order, Uranium Disposition Services, LLC - NCO-2010-01 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Uranium Disposition Services, LLC - NCO-2010-01 Uranium Disposition Services, LLC - NCO-2010-01 Consent Order, Uranium Disposition Services, LLC - NCO-2010-01 March 26, 2010 Consent Order issued to Uranium Disposition Services, LLC related to Construction Deficiencies at the DUF6 Conversion Buildings at the Portsmouth and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plants The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement has completed its investigation into the facts and circumstances associated with construction deficiencies at the DUF6 Conversion Buildings located at the Portsmouth and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plants. The investigation reports, dated January 22, 2009, and April 23, 2009, were provided to Uranium Disposition Services, LLC (DDS), and addressed specific areas of potential noncompliance with DOE nuclear safety requirements established in

270

Perforated Patch Recording  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Perforated patch recording is a special configuration in patch clamp recording that allows to measure whole?...

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

U.S. Natural Gas Monthly Supply and Disposition Balance  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Monthly Supply and Disposition Balance Monthly Supply and Disposition Balance (Billion Cubic Feet) Period: Monthly Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Data Series Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View History Gross Withdrawals 2,473 2,541 2,444 2,550 2,540 2,465 1973-2013 Marketed Production 2,086 2,166 2,097 2,188 2,188 2,105 1973-2013 NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent 107 110 107 113 117 116 1973-2013 Dry Production 1,979 2,056 1,990 2,076 2,071 1,989 1973-2013 Supplemental Gaseous Fuels 5 5 3 3 5 5 1973-2013 Net Imports 95 92 103 108 106 123 1973-2013 Net Storage Withdrawals -136 -418 -372 -275 -270 -355 1973-2013 Balancing Item 14 12 9 7 6 -5 2001-2013

272

Draft Environmental Assessment on the Remote-handled Waste Disposition  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Draft Environmental Assessment on the Remote-handled Waste Disposition Project available for public review and comment Draft Environmental Assessment on the Remote-handled Waste Disposition Project available for public review and comment The U.S. Department of Energy invites the public to review and comment on a draft environmental assessment that the Department issued today, for a proposal to process approximately 327 cubic meters of remote-handled waste currently stored at the Idaho National Laboratory. An additional five cubic meters of waste stored at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington is also evaluated since it is reasonably foreseeable that a decision may be made in the future to send that waste to Idaho for treatment. The project is necessary to prepare the waste for legally-required disposal. Under the Department�s preferred alternative, workers would use sealed rooms called hot cells at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) to process the waste, treat it as necessary and repackage it so that it is ready for disposal. The document describes the modifications necessary to hot cells to perform the work.

273

Innovative Resin Transfer and Disposition at Indian Point Unit 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A number of sites have both operating and shuttered nuclear facilities. Reducing dose to the caretakers can have beneficial effects for other site personnel who may work or pass near the shuttered facility. Furthermore, disposition of waste can have a positive effect on NRC required regular reporting of, and plans for the disposition of on-site wastes. Entergy's Indian Point Energy Center recently reduced the on-site curie load by working with RWE NUKEM and WMG, Inc. to innovatively free and ship nearly 1,000 cubic feet and nearly 600 curies of 30 year old resin and sludge from Unit 1. Old drawings, operations logs, were consulted and transfer lines were remotely checked. The tank selection sequence was primarily based on dose rates. System modifications to facilitate resin transfer were made on the lowest dose tanks first to gain current operating experience. Resin transfers were performed in accordance with the procedures developed, into waiting cask with appropriate waste containers. Decomposed resin of varying consistency could clog discharge lines and operational changes were made to mitigate against flow interruptions. Hydrogen buildup in the tanks was carefully addressed while solidified resin remains a challenge to be overcome. (authors)

Posivak, E.J.; Freitag, A.A.; Miller, R.J. [WMG, Inc., Peekskill, NY (United States)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Major Risk Factors Integrated Facility Disposition Project - Oak Ridge  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

O O O f f f f i i c c e e o o f f E E n n v v i i r r o o n n m m e e n n t t a a l l M M a a n n a a g g e e m m e e n n t t ( ( E E M M ) ) E E n n g g i i n n e e e e r r i i n n g g a a n n d d T T e e c c h h n n o o l l o o g g y y External Technical Review (ETR) Report Major Risk Factors Integrated Facility Disposition Project (IFDP) Oak Ridge, TN AUGUST 1, 2008 Acknowledgement The External Technical Review of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project was conducted simultaneous to other assessments and visits. The ETR Team wishes to note the outstanding support received from all parties involved in the review, including the DOE Oak Ridge Office, the National Nuclear Security Administration Y-12 Site Office, UT-Battelle, B&W Y-12, and the Professional Project Services, Inc. (Pro2Serve). The ETR Team feels compelled to note, and

275

Generation!and!Disposition!of!Municipal!Solid!Waste! (MSW)!in!the!United!States!A!National!Survey!  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

! 1! ! Generation!and!Disposition!of!Municipal!Solid!Waste! (MSW Waste (MSW) Generation and Disposition in the U.S., in collaboration with Ms. Nora Goldstein of Bio in 2012 and in 2013 EEC and BioCycle agreed that the 2013 Survey of Waste Generation and Disposition

276

_PART I - THE SCHEDULE  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

15 dated 9/9/13 Contract No. DE-AC04-94AL85000 15 dated 9/9/13 Contract No. DE-AC04-94AL85000 Modification No. M202 Part I - The Schedule Sections B through H TABLE OF CONTENTS B-1 SERVICES BEING ACQUIRED ...................................................................................... 4 B-2 CONTRACT TYPE AND VALUE (Rev. M218, M222, M236, M241, M261, M266, M288, M293, M312, M319, M344, M365, M400, M404, M443, M448, M473, M484, M0512, A0514) ............................................................................................................................ 4 B-3 AVAILABILITY OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS ................................................................. 8 B-9999 AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT WORK VALUES (Added M331; Modified: A335, A336, A340, A341, A342, A346, A347, A348, A349, A350,

277

Structure Breakdown Workshop Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Breakdown Breakdown Workshop SLAC, Orange Room August 28 - 30 , 2000 Announcement Workshop Poster Workshop Goals: The Goal of the workshop is to review understanding of warm structure breakdown phenomena, to define common terms for comparing tests and to identify avenues for further study. For a partial bibliography, please view the following URL : http://www-project.slac.stanford.edu/lc/wkshp/RFBreakdwn/references/publist.htm Schedule and Presentations: Monday, August 28 8:30 - Operation Experience and Definition of Problem Moderator - G. Loew (initial questions) Opening remarks and introduction (C. Adolphsen) (15min) CERN Structure Operation Results (W. Wuensch) (30 min) NLCTA Structure Operation Results (C. Adolphsen) (30 min) ASTA Structure Operation Results (R. Loewen) (20 min)

278

Speaker Host Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

User Science Seminar User Science Seminar Previous Speakers User Science Seminar Host Schedule User seminar is hosted by a different XSD group leader every two weeks. If you have any suggestions for possible speakers for the following dates, please contact the appropiate group leader below. Month Host 2012 October 5 & 12, 2012 Peter Chupas October 19 & 26,2012 Jon Almer November 2 & 9,2012 Francesco Decarlo November 16, 2012 Stefan Vogt November 23, 2012 Cancelled - Thanksgiving Holiday December 7, 2012 Stefan Vogt December 14 & 21, 2012 Randy Winans December 28, 2012 Cancelled - Xmas Holiday 2013 Janurary 4-25, 2013 Cancelled - January Shutdown February 1 & 8 , 2013 Lahsen Assoufid February 15 & 22, 2013 Thomas Gog March 1 & 8, 2013 Jonathan Lang

279

schedule_2006.xls  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 Long Range Operations Schedule 6 Long Range Operations Schedule (October 2005 - September 2006) 1 1 1 1 → 1 1 1 4 → 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 → 2 1 → 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 1 → 2 3 3 4 3 1 → 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 1 → 3 4 4 4 4 1 → 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 → 4 5 5 4 5 1 → 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 1 → 5 6 6 4 6 1 6 6 6 4 6 6 6 6 6 1 → 6 7 7 4 7 1 → 7 7 7 4 7 7 7 7 7 1 → 7 8 8 4 8 1 → 8 8 8 4 → 8 8 8 8 8 1 8 9 9 9 1 → 9 9 9 4 9 9 9 9 9 1 → 9 10 10 10 1 → 10 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 10 1 → 10 11 11 11 1 → 11 11 11 4 11 11 11 11 11 1 → 11 12 12 12 1 → 12 12 12 4 12 1 → 12 12 12 4 → 12 1 → 12 13 13 13 1 13 13 13 4 13 1 → 13 13 13 4 13 1 → 13 14 14 14 5 → 14 14 14 14 1 → 14 14 14 4 14 1 → 14 15 15 15 5 15 15 15 15 1 → 15 15 15 4 15 1 15 16 16 16 5 16 16 16 16 1

280

Wholesale Power Rate Schedules | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Rate Schedules » Wholesale Power Rate Schedules Services » Rate Schedules » Wholesale Power Rate Schedules Wholesale Power Rate Schedules October 1, 2012 ALA-1-N Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: PowerSouth Energy Cooperative System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 Duke-1-E Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Duke On-System System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 Duke-2-E Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Central System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 Duke-3-E Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: None System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 Duke-4-E Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Duke Self-Schedulers System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 MISS-1-N Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: South Mississippi Electric Power Association

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Wholesale Power Rate Schedules | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Rate Schedules » Wholesale Power Rate Schedules Services » Rate Schedules » Wholesale Power Rate Schedules Wholesale Power Rate Schedules October 1, 2012 ALA-1-N Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: PowerSouth Energy Cooperative System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 Duke-1-E Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Duke On-System System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 Duke-2-E Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Central System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 Duke-3-E Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: None System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 Duke-4-E Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Duke Self-Schedulers System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina October 1, 2012 MISS-1-N Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: South Mississippi Electric Power Association

282

Scheduling algorithms for arbitrary communication networks  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We consider the problem of designing scheduling schemes for networks with arbitrary topology and scheduling constraints. We address the optimality of scheduling schemes for packet networks in terms of throughput, delay and ...

Jagabathula, Srikanth

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

Your Records Management Responsibilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Your Records Management Your Records Management Responsibilities Table of Contents INTRODUCTION RECORDS MANAGEMENT IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY IMPORTANCE OF RECORDS MANAGEMENT YOUR RECORDS MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES RECORDS MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE ELECTRONIC RECORDS & RECORDKEEPING LAW, REGULATION, AND POLICY ASSISTANCE RECORDS MANAGEMENT TERMS 2 INTRODUCTION If you are a government employee or contractor working for a federal agency, records management is part of your job. This pamphlet explains your responsibilities for federal records and provides the context for understanding records management in the federal government and in the Department of Energy. TOP RECORDS MANAGEMENT IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

284

INSTRUCTIONS for COMPLETING SCHEDULE CARD WEB FORMS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Mar 22, 2012 ... Instructions for completing schedule card web forms. The following students are required to complete schedule card web forms. all returning...

Kelly Beranger

2012-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

285

LCLS Operating Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

LCLS Operating Schedule LCLS Operating Schedule August - December 2009 Ver: 2 10/30/09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 S Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S Su M 0000-0800 MD MD MD MD MD 0800-1600 ROD MD AMO ROD MD AMO 1600-2400 MD MD Commissioning MD MD Comm. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S Su M T W 0000-0800 MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD 0800-1600 MD ROD AMO MD ROD AMO MD ROD AMO MD ROD AMO ROD 1600-2400 MD MD Commissioning MD MD Commissioning MD MD Commissioning MD MD Commissioning MD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Th F S Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S 0000-0800 MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD 0800-1600 Young MD ROD DiMauro MD ROD Berrah MD ROD Coffee MD ROD Young-II 1600-2400 L018 MD MD L026 MD MD L015 MD MD L027 MD MD L017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Su

286

Wholesale Power Rate Schedules | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Schedules Schedules Wholesale Power Rate Schedules October 1, 2011 CBR-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Big Rivers and Henderson, KY System: CU October 1, 2011 CSI-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Southern Illinois System: CU October 1, 2011 CK-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: KU Area System: CU October 1, 2011 CEK-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: East Kentucky System: CU October 1, 2011 CC-1-I Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: CP&L Area, Western Division System: CU September 20, 2011 JW-1-J Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Woodruff Preference Customer System: Jim Woodruff September 20, 2011 JW-2-F Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Florida Power Corporation System: Jim Woodruff November 17, 2010 AP-1-B Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: American Electric Power

287

Microsoft Word - BingenSwitchDisposition_CXMemo.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2012 7, 2012 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Joan Kendall Realty Specialist - TERR-3 Proposed Action: Bingen Substation Sectionalizing Switches Disposition Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.24 Property Transfers Location: Klickitat County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to sell two sectionalizing switches owned by BPA but located on PacifiCorp's Condit-Powerdale 69-kilovolt (kV) line in and adjacent to the Bingen Substation. BPA sold the Bingen substation to Klickitat County PUD in 1997 but retained ownership rights to inspect, maintain, repair, and replace its remaining revenue meters,

288

Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

86 86 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 156 / Thursday, August 13, 1998 / Notices 1 SRS has been identified by DOE as the preferred site for the immobilization disposition facility. responsibilities are to (1) evaluate the standards of accreditation applied to applicant foreign medical schools; and (2) determine the comparability of those standards to standards for accreditation applied to United States medical schools. For Further Information Contact: Bonnie LeBold, Executive Director, National Committee on Foreign Medical Education and Accreditation, 7th and D Streets, S.W., Room 3082, ROB #3, Washington, D.C. 20202-7563. Telephone: (202) 260-3636. Beginning September 28, 1998, you may call to obtain the identity of the countries whose standards are to be evaluated during this

289

ABSTRACT REQUESTER CONTRACT SCOPE OF WORK RATIONAL FOR DECISION DISPOSITION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WAIVER ACTION - WAIVER ACTION - ABSTRACT REQUESTER CONTRACT SCOPE OF WORK RATIONAL FOR DECISION DISPOSITION General Motors Conduct research, development and Cost Sharing 20 percent Recommended Corporation testing of 30 KW proton-exchange- membrane (PEM) fuel cell propulsion systems 0 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS REQUEST BY GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION FOR AN ADVANCE WAIVER OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN RIGHTS UNDER CONTRACT NO. DE-AC02-90CH10435, W(A)-90- 056, CH-0663 The Allison Gas Turbine Division of the General Motors Corporation (hereafter GM), a large business, has petitioned for an advance waiver of patent rights under DOE Contract No. DE-AC02- 90CH10435. The contract, yet to be definitized, resulted from an RFP issued in January 1990. As set out in the attached waiver petition, GM has requested that domestic and foreign title to

290

Master EM Project Definition Rating Index - Facility Disposition Definitions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

43 43 Master EM Project Definition Rating Index - Facility Disposition Definitions The following definitions describe the criteria required to achieve a maximum rating or maturity value of 5. It should be assumed that maturity values of 1-5 represent a subjective assessment of the quality of definition and/or the degree to which the end-state or maximum criteria have been met, or the product has been completed in accordance with the definition of maturity values. Rating Element Criteria for Maximum Rating COST A1 Cost Estimate A cost estimate has been developed and formally approved by DOE and is the basis for the cost baselines. The cost estimate is a reasonable approximation of Total Project Costs, and covers all phases of the project. The estimate is prepared in

291

Radiation Damage Effects in Candidate Titanates for Pu Disposition: Zirconolite  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Specimens of titanate ceramics containing approximately 10 mass% 238Pu were tested to determine the long-term effects of radiation-induced damage from the ? decay of 239Pu that would have been disposed of in the nuclear-waste repository at Yucca Mountain. These tests provided information on the changes in bulk properties such as dimensions, densities, and chemical durability. Although these materials become amorphous at low doses, the specimens remained physically strong. Even after the radiation-induced swelling saturated, the specimens remained physically intact with no evidence for microcracking. Thus, in combination with results reported previously on similar materials, the material remains a physically viable material for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade Pu.

Strachan, Denis M.; Scheele, Randall D.; Buck, Edgar C.; Kozelisky, Anne E.; Sell, Rachel L.; Elovich, Robert J.; Buchmiller, William C.

2008-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

292

Status of nuclear weapons material disposition in Russia  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The security of nuclear weapons and fissile material in Russia, the disposition of weapons-usable fissile material in Russia, the Clinton administration`s policies and programs for assisting Russia in improving its security over nuclear weapons and fissile material, and the disposal of Russian weapons-usable fissile materials are discussed in this paper. There are {approximately}30,000 nuclear warheads in the former Soviet Union, {approximately}1000 t of weapon-usable high-enriched uranium (HEU), {approximately} 160 t of separated plutonium in weapons or available for weapons, and {approximately}30 t of separated civil plutonium stored in Russia. Most, if not all, of these inventories are stored under inadequate conditions of physical security and of material control and accounting.

Cochran, T.B.

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

293

Reactor-Based Plutonium Disposition: Opportunities, Options, and Issues  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The end of the Cold War has created a legacy of surplus fissile materials (plutonium and highly enriched uranium) in the United States (U.S.) and the former Soviet Union. These materials pose a danger to national and international security. During the past few years, the U.S. and Russia have engaged in an ongoing dialog concerning the safe storage and disposition of surplus fissile material stockpiles. In January 1997, the Department of Energy (DOE) announced the U. S. would pursue a dual track approach to rendering approximately 50 metric tons of plutonium inaccessible for use in nuclear weapons. One track involves immobilizing the plutonium by combining it with high-level radioactive waste in glass or ceramic ''logs''. The other method, referred to as reactor-based disposition, converts plutonium into mixed oxide (MOX) fuel for nuclear reactors. The U.S. and Russia are moving ahead rapidly to develop and demonstrate the technology required to implement the MOX option in their respective countries. U.S. MOX fuel research and development activities were started in the 1950s, with irradiation of MOX fuel rods in commercial light water reactors (LWR) from the 1960s--1980s. In all, a few thousand MOX fuel rods were successfully irradiated. Though much of this work was performed with weapons-grade or ''near'' weapons-grade plutonium--and favorable fuel performance was observed--the applicability of this data for licensing and use of weapons-grade MOX fuel manufactured with modern fuel fabrication processes is somewhat limited. The U.S. and Russia are currently engaged in an intensive research, development, and demonstration program to support implementation of the MOX option in our two countries. This paper focuses on work performed in the U.S. and provides a brief summary of joint U.S./Russian work currently underway.

Greene, S.R.

1999-07-17T23:59:59.000Z

294

Radiation Damage Effects in Candidate Titanates for Pu Disposition: Zirconolite  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the second of two papers on the results of radiation-induced damage accumulation in titanate ceramics that potentially could be used for weapons grade plutonium disposition. In the first paper we discussed the results from pyrochlore (betafite) based ceramics. In this paper, we discuss the effects of radiation-induced damage on the density and crystal structure of a nominally phase-pure zirconolite and two other zirconolite-bearing ceramics from the alpha decay of 238Pu. Macro (bulk) and micro (X-ray diffraction) swelling were found to be temperature independent, whereas the density determined with He gas pycnometry was temperature dependent. It took approximately 740 days (2.6?1018 ?/g) for the specimens to become X-ray amorphouslonger for the swelling to saturate. Unlike what we observed for the pyrochlore-based ceramics, we did not observe any phase changes associated with storage temperature and damage ingrowth. The forward dissolution rate at a pH value of 2 for material containing essentially all zirconolite is 1.7(4)?10-3 g/(m2?d). Very little pH dependence was observed for zirconolite specimens and, like we observed for the pyrochlore-bearing ceramics in this study, there was no dependence on the amount of radiation-induced damage. As with the pyrochlore, these materials did not become substantially friable with increasing radiation-induced damage. Even after the radiation-induced swelling saturated, the specimens remained physically intact with no evidence for microcracking. Thus, the material remains physically a viable material for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade Pu.

Strachan, Denis M.; Scheele, Randall D.; Buck, Edgar C.; Kozelisky, Anne E.; Sell, Rachel L.; Elovich, Robert J.; Buchmiller, William C.

2008-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

295

,"U.S. Natural Gas Monthly Supply and Disposition Balance"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Monthly Supply and Disposition Balance" Monthly Supply and Disposition Balance" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Natural Gas Monthly Supply and Disposition Balance",9,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1973" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_sndm_s1_m.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_sndm_s1_m.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov"

296

,"U.S. Natural Gas Annual Supply and Disposition Balance"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Annual Supply and Disposition Balance" Annual Supply and Disposition Balance" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Supply",5,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1930" ,"Data 2","Disposition",5,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1930" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_snd_dcu_nus_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_snd_dcu_nus_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov"

297

On parallel machine scheduling 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

On parallel machine scheduling 1 machines with setup times. The setup has to be performed by a single server. The objective is to minimize even for the case of two identical parallel machines. This paper presents a pseudopolynomial

Magdeburg, Universität

298

Task merging for better scheduling  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper proposes a new algorithm to restructure task graphs for suitable scheduling. The algorithm reduces communication costs by merging those tasks within a task graph whose communication costs exceeds their execution time. Task duplication techniques ...

Saeed Parsa; Neda Reza Soltani; Saeed Shariati

2009-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Delay tails in MapReduce scheduling  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

MapReduce/Hadoop production clusters exhibit heavy-tailed characteristics for job processing times. These phenomena are resultant of the workload features and the adopted scheduling algorithms. Analytically understanding the delays under different schedulers ... Keywords: MapReduce, coupling scheduler, fair scheduler, first in first out, hadoop, heavy-tails, processor sharing

Jian Tan; Xiaoqiao Meng; Li Zhang

2012-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

Provably Efficient Two-Level Adaptive Scheduling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

processor reallocation, our schedulers provide control over the scheduling overhead and ensure effectiveProvably Efficient Two-Level Adaptive Scheduling Yuxiong He1 , Wen-Jing Hsu1 , and Charles E. Multiprocessor scheduling in a shared multiprogramming en- vironment can be structured in two levels, where

Feitelson, Dror

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Wireless Link Scheduling under Physical Interference Model  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

approximation algorithms for link scheduling with or without power control. Index Terms--Link schedulingWireless Link Scheduling under Physical Interference Model Peng-Jun Wan, Ophir Frieder, Xiaohua Jia: jia@cs.cityu.edu.hk, csfyao@cityu.edu.hk Abstract--Link scheduling is a fundamental problem in multi

Jia, Xiaohua

302

To: Mansueti, Lawrence Subject: RE: Pepco Scheduled Line Repair Dec. 1-20, 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

From: ecchimento@comcast.net [mailto:ecchimento@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 6:28 PM To: Mansueti, Lawrence Subject: RE: Pepco Scheduled Line Repair Dec. 1-20, 2006 Larry, Regarding the planned line outage, scheduled for Feb. 20 through Mar. 6, I am requesting that the residents near the plant be moved for the duration of the outage to protect their health. Would you include this comment also in the ongoing recorded discussion? Thank you. Elizabeth

303

Bringing the User Back into Scheduling: Two Case Studies of Interaction with Intelligent Scheduling Assistants  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of scheduling, or they demand too much control of an important aspect of the individual's working world. PTIMEBringing the User Back into Scheduling: Two Case Studies of Interaction with Intelligent Scheduling This position paper discusses the scheduling problem as collaboration between human and automated scheduling

Yorke-Smith, Neil

304

DOE/EIS-0283; Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (11/1999)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 of 5 3 of 5 Volume II Final Environmental Impact Statement November 1999 DOE/EIS-0283 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II United States Department of Energy Office of Fissile Materials Disposition November 1999 Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (SPD EIS) (DOE/EIS-0283) Locations of Candidate Sites: California, Idaho, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington Contacts: For further information on the SPD Final EIS contact: For information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Mr. G. Bert Stevenson, NEPA Compliance Officer Ms. Carol Borgstrom, Director Office of Fissile Materials Disposition

305

Used Fuel Disposition R&D Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Used Fuel Disposition Used Fuel Disposition Research & Development » Used Fuel Disposition R&D Documents Used Fuel Disposition R&D Documents December 4, 2013 Preliminary Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) This report documents the first phase of a multi-year project to understand the technical feasibility and logistical implications of direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel in existing dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) and other types of storage casks. October 25, 2013 Deep Borehole Disposal Research: Demonstration Site Selection Guidelines, Borehole Seals Design, and RD&D Needs Deep borehole disposal is one alternative for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive waste forms; identifying a site or areas with favorable geological, hydrogeological, and geochemical conditions is one of

306

AEO2011:Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary Dataset Summary Description This dataset comes from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and is part of the 2011 Annual Energy Outlook Report (AEO2011). This dataset is table 1, and contains only the reference case. The dataset uses quadrillion Btu and the U.S. Dollar. The data is broken down into production, imports, exports, consumption and price. Source EIA Date Released April 26th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords 2011 AEO consumption disposition energy exports imports Supply Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon AEO2011:Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary- Reference Case (xls, 112.8 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Peer Reviewed Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage

307

EIS-0475: Disposition of the Bannister Federal Complex, Kansas City, MO |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0475: Disposition of the Bannister Federal Complex, Kansas EIS-0475: Disposition of the Bannister Federal Complex, Kansas City, MO EIS-0475: Disposition of the Bannister Federal Complex, Kansas City, MO Summary NNSA/DOE announces its intent to prepare an EIS for the disposition of the Bannister Federal Complex, Kansas City, MO. NNSA previously decided in a separate NEPA review (EA-1592) to relocate its operations from the Bannister Federal Complex to a newly constructed industrial campus eight miles from the current location. NOTE: On November 30, 2012, DOE announced the cancellation of this EIS and its intent to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA-1947). Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download November 30, 2012 EA-1947: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment and

308

Fuel Cycle Potential Waste Inventory for Disposition Rev 5 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fuel Cycle Potential Waste Inventory for Disposition Rev 5 Fuel Cycle Potential Waste Inventory for Disposition Rev 5 Fuel Cycle Potential Waste Inventory for Disposition Rev 5 The United States currently utilizes a once-through fuel cycle where used nuclear fuel is stored onsite in either wet pools or in dry storage systems with ultimate disposal envisioned in a deep mined geologic repository. This report provides an estimate of potential waste inventory and waste form characteristics for the DOE used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste and a variety of commercial fuel cycle alternatives in order to support subsequent system-level evaluations of disposal system performance. Fuel Cycle Potential Waste Inventory for Disposition R5a.docx More Documents & Publications Repository Reference Disposal Concepts and Thermal Load Management Analysis

309

EA-1410: Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10: Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los 10: Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico EA-1410: Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal to remove the Omega West Facility and the remaining support structures from Los Alamos Canyon at the U.S. Department of Energy Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 28, 2002 EA-1410: Finding of No Significant Impact Proposed Disposition of the Omega West Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico March 28, 2002 EA-1410: Final Environmental Assessment

310

On Solar Energy Disposition:A Perspective from Observation and Modeling  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Solar energy disposition (SED) concerns the amount of solar radiation reflected to space, absorbed in the atmosphere, and absorbed at the surface. The state of knowledge on SED is examined by comparing eight datasets from surface and satellite ...

Zhanqing Li; Louis Moreau; Albert Arking

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

AEO2011: Natural Gas Supply, Disposition, and Prices | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Supply, Disposition, and Prices Supply, Disposition, and Prices Dataset Summary Description This dataset comes from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and is part of the 2011 Annual Energy Outlook Report (AEO2011). This dataset is table 13, and contains only the reference case. The dataset uses gigawatts. The data is broken down into production, net imports, consumption by sector and price. Source EIA Date Released April 26th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords 2011 AEO disposition EIA natural gas supply prices Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon AEO2011: Natural Gas Supply, Disposition, and Prices - Reference Case (xls, 91.8 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Peer Reviewed Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Annually Time Period 2008-2035 License License Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL)

312

EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision Interim Management of Nuclear Materials at the Savannah River Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS), ''Interim Management of Nuclear Materials'' (DOE/EIS-0220, October 20, 1995), to assess the potential environmental impacts of actions necessary to manage nuclear materials at the Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, South Carolina, until decisions on their ultimate disposition are made and implemented. Some of the particular materials considered in the EIS could present environment, safety and health vulnerabilities in their current storage condition. DOE/EIS-0220, Savannah River Operations Office; Interim Management of

313

EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the Record of Decision the Record of Decision (61 FR 25092; May 17, 1996) on the Environmental Impact Statement on a Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel (FRR SNF EIS) (DOE/EIS-0218, February 1996) to allow the United States to transport up to 1 metric ton heavy metal (MTHM) (1.1 tons) of spent nuclear fuel (Gap Material SNF) from foreign research reactor (FRR) locations to the United States and safely store this Gap Material at a DOE site pending disposition. DOE/EIS-0218, DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration, Revised Record of Decision for the Environmental Impact Statement on a Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel (January 2009) 74 FR 4173

314

Environmental Assessment Addendum Disposition of Additional Waste at the Paducah Site  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9-A 9-A Environmental Assessment Addendum Disposition of Additional Waste at the Paducah Site December 2003 U. S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Oak Ridge, Tennessee DOE/EA-1339-A Disposition of Additional Waste at the Paducah Site Environmental Assessment Addendum December 2003 U. S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations U.S. Department of Energy Paducah Site DOE/EA-1339A Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ v Acronyms.......................................................................................................................................

315

US weapons-useable plutonium disposition policy: implementation of the MOX fuel option  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

US WEAPONS-USEABLE PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION POLICY: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MOX FUEL OPTION A Thesis by VANESSA L. GONZALEZ Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas ARM University in partial fulfillment of the requirements... for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 1998 Major Subject: Political Science US WEAPONS-USEABLE PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION POLICY: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MOX FUEL OPTION A Thesis by VANESSA L. GONZALEZ Submitted to Texas ARM University in partial fulfillment...

Gonzalez, Vanessa L

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

316

DOE F 1324.9 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

to DOE F 1324.10. It provides additional space for completing 1324.10, should the records inventory be lengthy. RECORDS INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULE (RIDS)-CONTINUED...

317

DOE F 1324.10 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 DOE F 1324.10 Form used to provide an inventory of an organization's records series and non-record material, including the applicable disposition schedule and authorization...

318

TRU Waste Management Program. Cost/schedule optimization analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Current Year Work Plan presents in detail a description of the activities to be performed by the Joint Integration Office Rockwell International (JIO/RI) during FY86. It breaks down the activities into two major work areas: Program Management and Program Analysis. Program Management is performed by the JIO/RI by providing technical planning and guidance for the development of advanced TRU waste management capabilities. This includes equipment/facility design, engineering, construction, and operations. These functions are integrated to allow transition from interim storage to final disposition. JIO/RI tasks include program requirements identification, long-range technical planning, budget development, program planning document preparation, task guidance development, task monitoring, task progress information gathering and reporting to DOE, interfacing with other agencies and DOE lead programs, integrating public involvement with program efforts, and preparation of reports for DOE detailing program status. Program Analysis is performed by the JIO/RI to support identification and assessment of alternatives, and development of long-term TRU waste program capabilities. These analyses include short-term analyses in response to DOE information requests, along with performing an RH Cost/Schedule Optimization report. Systems models will be developed, updated, and upgraded as needed to enhance JIO/RI's capability to evaluate the adequacy of program efforts in various fields. A TRU program data base will be maintained and updated to provide DOE with timely responses to inventory related questions.

Detamore, J.A.; Raudenbush, M.H.; Wolaver, R.W.; Hastings, G.A.

1985-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

1996 Wholesale Power and Transmission Rate Schedules.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration`s (BPA) 1996 Wholesale Power Rate Schedules, 1996 Ancillary Products and Services Rate Schedule, 1996 Transmission Rate Schedules, and General Rate Schedule Provisions, contained herein, were approved on an interim basis effective October 1, 1996. These rate schedules and provisions were approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), United States Department of Energy, in September 1996 (Docket Nos EF96-2011-000 and EF96f-2021-000). These rate schedules and General Rate Schedule Provisions were approved on a final basis by the FERC July 30, 1997, in Dept. of Energy--Bonneville Power Administration, Docket Nos. EF96-2011-000 and EF96-2021-000. Except as noted elsewhere, these 1996 rate schedules and provisions supersede BPA`s Wholesale Power Rate Schedules and General Rate Schedule Provisions, and Transmission Rate Schedules and General Transmission Rate Schedule Provisions, effective October 1, 1995. These rate schedules and general rate schedule provisions include all errata.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

Argonne National Lab Cleanup schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Takes Steps to Complete Clean-Up of Argonne by 2003; Takes Steps to Complete Clean-Up of Argonne by 2003; Schedule for Shipping Waste to WIPP is 'Good News' for Illinois CARLSBAD, N.M., May 15, 2000 - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reinforced plans to complete the clean-up of its Argonne National Laboratory-East site in Illinois by 2003 by accelerating its schedule for shipping transuranic waste to DOE's permanent disposal site in New Mexico. Previously, the shipments were not expected to begin before 2003. Under the accelerated schedule, shipments to DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico, are expected to begin in Spring 2001 and be completed by the end of the calendar year. Characterization of the waste currently stored at Argonne will begin this October. This agreement is a major step in honoring Argonne and DOE's commitment to the community to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

NSLS-II Project Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NSLS-II Project Schedule NSLS-II Project Schedule Major Milestone Event Major Milestone Event Preliminary Schedule CD-0 (approve Mission Need) 4th quarter, FY2005 CD-1 (approve Alternative Selection and Cost Range) 4th quarter, FY2007 CD-2 (approve Performance Baseline) 1st quarter, FY2008 CD-3 (approve Start of Construction) 2nd quarter, FY2009 CD-4 (approve Start of Operations) FY2015 Critical Decisions The five Critical Decisions are major milestones approved by the Secretarial Acquisition Executive or Acquisition Executive that establish the mission need, recommended alternative, Acquisition Strategy, the Performance Baseline, and other essential elements required to ensure that the project meets applicable mission, design, security, and safety requirements. Each Critical Decision marks an increase in commitment of

322

U.S. Crude Oil Supply & Disposition  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View History Supply Field Production (Commercial) 1,853,122 1,829,897 1,954,021 1,996,787 2,063,138 2,374,842 1859-2012 Alaskan 263,595 249,874 235,491 218,904 204,829 192,368 1981-2012 Lower 48 States 1,589,527 1,580,024 1,718,529 1,777,883 1,858,309 2,182,474 1993-2012 Imports 3,661,404 3,580,694 3,289,675 3,362,856 3,261,422 3,120,755 1910-2012 Commercial 3,658,701 3,573,581 3,269,307 3,362,856 3,261,422 3,120,755 2001-2012 Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) 2,703 7,113 20,368 1977-2009 Adjustments (Commercial) 9,742 5,777 29,077 37,829 63,600 52,746 1981-2012 Disposition Stock Change -17,835 44,617 24,132 8,180 -33,345 34,134 1983-2012 Commercial -26,171 39,735 -661 8,251 -2,751 34,817 1993-2012

323

Radiation damage effects in candidate titanates for Pu disposition: Zirconolite  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Results from studies of radiation-induced damage from the alpha decay of 238Pu on the density and crystal structure of a nominally phase-pure zirconolite and two other zirconolite-bearing ceramics are discussed. Macro and micro swelling were found to be temperature independent, whereas the density determined with He gas pycnometry was temperature dependent. Approximately 2.6נ1018?/g were needed to render the specimens X-ray amorphous more to saturate the swelling. Unlike pyrochlore-based ceramics, we did not observe any phase changes associated with storage temperature and damage ingrowth. The forward dissolution rate at a pH value of 2 for material containing essentially all zirconolite is 1.7(4)נ10?3g/(m2d) with very little pH dependence and no dependence on the amount of radiation-induced damage. Even after the radiation-induced swelling saturated, the specimens remained physically intact with no evidence for microcracking. Thus, the material remains physically a viable material for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade Pu.

D.M. Strachan; R.D. Scheele; E.C. Buck; A.E. Kozelisky; R.L. Sell; R.J. Elovich; W.C. Buchmiller

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

Technical Qualification Program Accreditation Schedule  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Qualification Program (TQP) Accreditation Schedule Qualification Program (TQP) Accreditation Schedule (Note 1) Year 2013 2014 Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec P Site/Office EM Sites/Offices Y Carlsbad Field Office ? Consolidated Business Center Y Office of River Protection (Note 3) ? Office of Site Support and Small Projects N Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Y Richland Operations Office (Note 3) Y Savannah River Operations Office N Office of Environmental Management SC Sites/Offices

325

DOE/EIS-0240-SA-1: Supplement Analysis for the Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium (October 2007)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0-SA1 0-SA1 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM October 2007 U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Fissile Materials Disposition Washington, D.C. i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction and Purpose .................................................................................................................1 2.0 Background......................................................................................................................................1 2.1 Scope of the HEU EIS............................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Status of Surplus HEU Disposition Activities .......................................................................

326

Multi-agent Cluster Scheduling for Scalability and Flexibility  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of clusters scheduling and classical concurrency controlotherwise push control of task scheduling and execution towhich actively controls and modifies scheduling domains as

Konwinski, Andrew David

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

327

Adaptive Scheduling in Ad Hoc and Cellular Wireless Networks  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2004. 3 Joint Scheduling and Power Control for Multicastingusers. This joint scheduling and power control problem is38 Joint Scheduling and Power Control for Multicasting in

Tan, Choo Chin

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

A Hybrid Bin-Packing Heuristic to Multiprocessor Scheduling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Abstract. The multiprocessor scheduling problem consists in schedul- ...... parallel machine scheduling", Production Planning and Control 9 (1998), 685{689. 9.

329

Pump-1-A Wholesale Power Rate Schedule | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-A Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Pump-1-A Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Carters & Russell Pumping System: Georgia-Alabama-South Carolina This rate schedule shall be...

330

Barriers and Issues Related to Achieving Final Disposition of Depleted Uranium  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Approximately 750,000 metric tons (MT) of surplus depleted uranium (DU) in various chemical forms are stored at several Department of Energy (DOE) sites throughout the United States. Most of the DU is in the form of DU hexafluoride (DUF6) that resulted from uranium enrichment operations over the last several decades. DOE plans to convert the DUF6 to ''a more stable form'' that could be any one or combination of DU tetrafluoride (DUF4 or green salt), DU oxide (DUO3, DUO2, or DU3O8), or metal depending on the final disposition chosen for any given quantity. Barriers to final disposition of this material have existed historically and some continue today. Currently, the barriers are more related to finding uses for this material versus disposing as waste. Even though actions are beginning to convert the DUF6, ''final'' disposition of the converted material has yet to be decided. Unless beneficial uses can be implemented, DOE plans to dispose of this material as waste. This expresses the main barrier to DU disposition; DOE's strategy is to dispose unless uses can be found while the strategy should be only dispose as a last resort and make every effort to find uses. To date, only minimal research programs are underway to attempt to develop non-fuel uses for this material. Other issues requiring resolution before these inventories can reach final disposition (uses or disposal) include characterization, disposal of large quantities, storage (current and future), and treatment options. Until final disposition is accomplished, these inventories must be managed in a safe and environmentally sound manner; however, this is becoming more difficult as materials and facilities age. The most noteworthy final disposition technical issues include the development of reuse and treatment options.

Gillas, D. L.; Chambers, B. K.

2002-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

331

2000 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

History Book Records of Decision Tribal Affairs 2000 Records of Decision Fourmile Hill Geothermal Development Project Power Purchase and Transmission Service Agreements -...

332

SCHEDULE OF FEES Wet Milling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SCHEDULE OF FEES Wet Milling 100 g.......................$120..per sample* 1 kilogram of Illinois offers five milling procedures to determine processing characteristics of corn. Laboratory times. WET MILLING The wet milling process is used to produce starch (99.6% purity) as the primary

Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of

333

Optimization of Injection Scheduling in  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SGP-TR-I12 Optimization of Injection Scheduling in Geothermal Fields James Lovekin May 1987&injection optimization problem is broke$ into two subpmbkm:(1) choosing a configuration of injectorsfrom an existing set is defined as the fieldwide break- through lindex, B. Injection is optimized by choosing injection wells

Stanford University

334

Scheduling & Resources - Power Marketing - Sierra Nevada Region...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Marketing > Scheduling & Resources Scheduling & Resources - Greenbook 2004 (PDF - 1.04MB) - CVP Gross Power (XLS - 5.25MB) - CVP BaseResource (XLS - 2.02MB) - WY2002 Analysis (XLS...

335

Human aspects of scheduling : a case study  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This work presents a look at real-life production-floor scheduling, comparing and contrasting it to both normative OR theory and Cognitive Psychology theory. Relevant literature in OR, scheduling and psychology is reviewed, ...

Boasson, Yishai, 1973-

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Medical Exam Scheduling - HPMC Occupational Health Services  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Analysis Human Reliability Program (HRP) Industrial Rehabilitation & Ergonomics Infection Control & Immunizations Influenza Immunization Program Medical Exam Scheduling Medical...

337

Multi-Year Schedule | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

DOE's currently scheduled rulemaking activities for energy conservation standards and test procedures. multiyearscheduleaug2011.pdf More Documents & Publications 9th...

338

Move Frame Scheduling and Mixed SchedulingAllocation for the Automated Synthesis of Digital Systems y  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

steps: 1) Data path synthe­ sis (operation scheduling and hardware allocation), and 2) Control path design. In the scheduling phase, operations are assigned to the appropriate control steps. The allocaMove Frame Scheduling and Mixed Scheduling­Allocation for the Automated Synthesis of Digital

Nourani, Mehrdad

339

DYNAMIC SCHEDULING M. C. H. Wright  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for a time interval after which control is returned to the scheduling program to determine the best project who wants more time to evaluate their data can return control to the scheduling program, and come backDYNAMIC SCHEDULING M. C. H. Wright Radio Astronomy Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley

Militzer, Burkhard

340

CPU Inheritance Scheduling Bryan Ford Sai Susarla  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, providing much greater scheduling flexibil­ ity. Modular, hierarchical control can be provided over systems control the sharing of the machine's CPU resources among threads using a fixed scheduling schemeCPU Inheritance Scheduling Bryan Ford Sai Susarla Department of Computer Science University of Utah

Ford, Bryan

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

CPU Inheritance Scheduling Bryan Ford Sai Susarla  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, providing much greater scheduling flexibil- ity. Modular, hierarchical control can be provided overCPU Inheritance Scheduling Bryan Ford Sai Susarla Department of Computer Science University of Utah processor scheduling mechanisms in operat- ing systems are fairly rigid, often supportingonly one fixed

Ford, Bryan

342

Models for Train Scheduling Krishna C. Jha  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Models for Train Scheduling Krishna C. Jha Vice President - Research & Development krishna/analytics, and packaging into web-based map-based interfaces. Innovative Scheduling Overview #12;-3- The train schedule is one of most critical components in the passenger or freight transportations. The quality of a train

Bustamante, Fabián E.

343

Batch Scheduling with Deadlines on Parallel Machines  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Batch Scheduling with Deadlines on Parallel Machines Peter Brucker Mikhail Y. Kovalyov, Yakov M of scheduling G groups of jobs on m parallel machines is considered. Each group consists of several identical) and to schedule the batches on the machines. It is possible for different batches of the same group

Magdeburg, Universität

344

LM Records Handling System-Fernald Historical Records System...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fernald Historical Records System, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System-Fernald Historical Records System, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling...

345

DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Program Record, Record # 11003, Fuel...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Program Record, Record 11003, Fuel Cell Stack Durability DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Program Record, Record 11003, Fuel Cell Stack Durability Dated May 3, 2012, this program...

346

Cost and Schedule of the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

at the Savannah River Site" BACKGROUND In September 2000, the United States and Russia signed a Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement for the disposal of surplus...

347

Alternative technical summary report for direct disposition in deep boreholes: Direct disposal of plutonium metal/plutonium dioxide in compound canisters, Version 4.0. Fissile Materials Disposition Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes and compares the Immobilized and Direct Beep Borehole Disposition Alternatives. The important design concepts, facility features and operational procedures are briefly described, and a discussion of the issues that affect the evaluation of each alternative against the programmatic assessment criteria that have been established for selecting the preferred alternatives for plutonium disposition.

Wijesinghe, A.M.

1996-08-23T23:59:59.000Z

348

Flow shop scheduling with peak power consumption constraints  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Mar 29, 2012 ... Flow shop scheduling with peak power consumption constraints ... Keywords: scheduling, flow shop, energy, peak power consumption, integer...

K. Fang

2012-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

349

EIS-0203: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs The Record of Decision documents decisions made by the U.S. Department of Energy after the evaluation of the potential environmental impacts of a reasonable range of alternatives and appropriate nonenvironmental factors. The decisions fall into two categories, the first relating to the Department-wide management of Department of Energy- owned spent nuclear fuel for a period of up to forty years, pending the fuel's ultimate disposition, and the second relating to environmental restoration and waste management programs at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory over a period of ten years. DOE/EIS-0203, Department of Energy Record of Decision, Programmatic Spent

350

DOE/EIS-0283; Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (11/1999)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 of 5 2 of 5 Volume I - Part B Final Environmental Impact Statement November 1999 DOE/EIS-0283 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume I - Part B United States Department of Energy Office of Fissile Materials Disposition November 1999 Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (SPD EIS) (DOE/EIS-0283) Locations of Candidate Sites: California, Idaho, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington Contacts: For further information on the SPD Final EIS contact: For information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Mr. G. Bert Stevenson, NEPA Compliance Officer Ms. Carol Borgstrom, Director

351

AEO2011: Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary Dataset Summary Description This dataset comes from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and is part of the 2011 Annual Energy Outlook Report (AEO2011). This dataset is table 1, and contains only the reference case. The dataset uses quadrillion BTUs, and quantifies the energy prices using U.S. dollars. The data is broken down into total production, imports, exports, consumption, and prices for energy types. Source EIA Date Released April 26th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords 2011 AEO consumption EIA export import production reference case total energy Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon AEO2011: Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary - Reference Case (xls, 112.8 KiB) Quality Metrics

352

DOE Chooses Idaho Treatment Group, LLC to Disposition Waste at the Advanced  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chooses Idaho Treatment Group, LLC to Disposition Waste at the Chooses Idaho Treatment Group, LLC to Disposition Waste at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project: Contract will continue cleanup and waste operations at the Idaho Site DOE Chooses Idaho Treatment Group, LLC to Disposition Waste at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project: Contract will continue cleanup and waste operations at the Idaho Site May 27, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 Idaho Falls - In order to further meet the U.S. Department of Energy's commitments to the citizens of the state of Idaho, the DOE today announced that it has selected Idaho Treatment Group, LLC (ITG) to perform waste processing at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) at DOE's Idaho Site near Idaho Falls. The contract is estimated at approximately

353

U.S. and Russia Sign Plan for Russian Plutonium Disposition | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sign Plan for Russian Plutonium Disposition Sign Plan for Russian Plutonium Disposition U.S. and Russia Sign Plan for Russian Plutonium Disposition November 19, 2007 - 4:31pm Addthis Will Eliminate Enough Russian Plutonium for Thousands of Nuclear Weapons WASHINGTON, DC -U.S. Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman and Russian Federal Atomic Energy Agency Director Sergey Kiriyenko have signed a joint statement outlining a plan to dispose of 34 metric tons of surplus plutonium from Russia's weapons program. Under the new plan, the United States will cooperate with Russia to convert Russian weapon-grade plutonium into mixed oxide fuel (MOX) and irradiate the MOX fuel in the BN-600 fast reactor, currently operating at the Beloyarsk nuclear power plant, and in the BN-800 fast reactor, currently under construction at the same site. The United States and Russia also

354

DOE 2010 Safety and Security Reform Project - HSS Directives Disposition and Status (December 4, 2012)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 Safety and Security Reform Project - HSS Directives Disposition and Status (December 4, 2012) 10 Safety and Security Reform Project - HSS Directives Disposition and Status (December 4, 2012) Page 1 of 3 2010 HSS Directives Disposition Status Secretary of Energy Notice SEN-35-91, Nuclear Safety Policy Revise Complete - see Policy 420.1. Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment Revise Complete - see Order 458.1. Order 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Revise Complete - see Order 422.1. Order 5480.20A, Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements Revise Complete - see Order 426.2. Order 5480.30, Nuclear Reactor Design Criteria Re-certify Complete - re-certified. Manual 140.1-1B, Interface with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Re-certify Complete - re-certified.

355

EIS-0283-S1: Supplement to the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Environmental  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-S1: Supplement to the Surplus Plutonium Disposition 3-S1: Supplement to the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0283-S1: Supplement to the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Environmental Impact Statement SUMMARY The Supplement evaluates the potential environmental impacts of using MOX fuel in these six specific reactors named in the DCS proposal as well as other program changes made since the SPD Draft EIS was published. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 5, 1999 EIS-0236-S1: DOE Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement National Ignition Facility Draft Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management November 5, 1999 EIS-0236-S1: Notice of Availability for the Draft Supplemental Programmatic

356

Used Fuel Disposition R&D Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 31, 2011 March 31, 2011 Used Fuel Disposition Campaign Disposal Research and Development Roadmap The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology (OFCT) has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct the research and development (R&D) activities related to storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and high level nuclear waste (HLW). The Mission of the UFDC is March 30, 2011 Basis for Identification of Disposal Options for R and D for Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Waste The Used Fuel Disposition campaign (UFD) is selecting a set of geologic media for further study including variations on the design of the repository, the engineered barrier, and the waste. Salt, clay/shale, and

357

Superfund Policy Statements and Guidance Regarding Disposition of Radioactive Waste in Non-NRC Licensed Disposal Facilities - 13407  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This talk will discuss EPA congressional testimony and follow-up letters, as well as letters to other stakeholders on EPA's perspectives on the disposition of radioactive waste outside of the NRC licensed disposal facility system. This will also look at Superfund's historical practices, and emerging trends in the NRC and agreement states on waste disposition. (author)

Walker, Stuart [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (United States)] [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

358

The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Reluctance to provide personal health information could impede the success of web-based healthcare services. This paper focuses on the role of personal dispositions in disclosing health information online. The conceptual model argues that individuals' ... Keywords: Health status, Information privacy concern, Information sensitivity, Intrinsic and extrinsic perspectives of trust, Intrinsic factors, Personal dispositions, Personality, Trust, Utility Theory

Gaurav Bansal; Fatemeh "Mariam" Zahedi; David Gefen

2010-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Generation!and!Disposition!of!Municipal!Solid!Waste! (MSW)!in!the!United!States!A!National!Survey!  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

! 1! ! Generation!and!Disposition!of!Municipal!Solid!Waste! (MSW on Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Generation and Disposition in the U.S., in collaboration with Ms. Nora Goldstein was not carried out in 2012 and in 2013 EEC and BioCycle agreed that the 2013 Survey of Waste Generation

Columbia University

360

Weekly Petroleum Status Report Schedule  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Weekly Petroleum Status Report Weekly Petroleum Status Report Release Schedule The wpsrsummary.pdf, overview.pdf, and Tables 1-14 in CSV and XLS formats, are released to the Web site after 10:30 a.m. (Eastern Time) on Wednesday. All other PDF and HTML files are released to the Web site after 1:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Wednesday. Appendix D is produced during the winter heating season, which extends from October through March of each year. For some weeks which include holidays, releases are delayed by one day. Holiday Release Schedule The standard release time and day of the week will be at 10:30 a.m. (Eastern time) on Wednesdays with the following exceptions. All times are Eastern. Data for the week ending Alternate Release Date Release Day Release Time Holiday October 11, 2013 October 21, 2013 Monday 10:30 a.m. Columbus/EIA Closed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Providing Innovative Waste Management Disposition for the DOE Complex  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2005 2005 Operational Benefits of Using Dedicated Trains To Transport Spent Fuel To Yucca Mountain Presented by: Joe Grumski Dedicated Trains Dedicated Trains On Monday, July 18th, 2005, DOE distributed its new "Department of Energy Policy Statement for Use of Dedicated Trains for Waste Shipments to Yucca Mountain." Under this policy DOE will use dedicated train service - train service dedicated to one Commodity - for its rail transport of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste to the Yucca Mountain Repository site in Nevada. Dedicated Trains Dedicated Trains Why Dedicated Trains? *Safety *Security *Economics *Rail Logistics and Scheduling Why Dedicated Trains Safety * Direct transit reduces the time the packages are in transit as compared to regular train

362

Preliminary Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) for the Calcine Disposition Project Volume 1 (CDP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT OF THE CALCINE DISPOSITION PROJECT VOLUME ONE Anthony F. Kluk Hoyt C. Johnson Clyde Phillip McGinnis Michael Rinker Steven L. Ross Herbert G. Sutter John Vienna February 2011 Prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC February 2011 ii This page intentionally left blank. Review of Calcine Disposition Project Self-Assessment of Technology Maturation iii SIGNATURES ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Anthony F. Kluk, Team Lead Date ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Hoyt C. Johnson Date ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Clyde Phillip McGinnis Date ____________________________________ ____________________________________

363

Fuel qualification issues and strategies for reactor-based surplus plutonium disposition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has proposed irradiation of mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel in existing commercial reactors as a disposition method for surplus plutonium from the weapons program. The burning of MOX fuel in reactors is supported by an extensive technology base; however, the infrastructure required to implement reactor-based plutonium disposition does not exist domestically. This report identifies and examines the actions required to qualify and license weapons-grade (WG) plutonium-based MOX fuels for use in domestic commercial light-water reactors (LWRs).

Cowell, B.S.; Copeland, G.L.; Moses, D.L.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

DOE/EIS-0283; Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (11/1999)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary Final Environmental Impact Statement November 1999 Summary DOE/EIS-0283 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement Summary United States Department of Energy Office of Fissile Materials Disposition November 1999 Summary i Table of Contents S.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S-1 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S-3 Issues Identified During the Scoping Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S-4 Issues Already Intended for Inclusion in the SPD EIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S-4 Additional Issues That Need to Be Addressed in the SPD EIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S-5 Issues That Need to Be or Are Already Addressed Elsewhere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

365

This Week In Petroleum Schedule  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

This Week In Petroleum Schedule This Week In Petroleum Schedule Holiday Release Schedule for the This Week In Petroleum The standard release time and day of the week will be after 1:00 p. m. (Eastern time) on Wednesdays with the following exceptions. Data for the week ending Alternate Release Date Release Day Release Time Holiday November 8, 2013 November 14, 2013 Thursday after 1:00 p.m. Veterans December 20, 2013 December 27, 2013 Friday after 1:00 p.m. Christmas December 27, 2013 January 3, 2014 Friday after 1:00 p.m. New Year's January 17, 2014 January 23, 2014 Thursday after 1:00 p.m. Martin Luther King Jr. February 14, 2014 February 20, 2014 Thursday after 1:00 p.m. President's May 23, 2014 May 29, 2014 Thursday after 1:00 p.m. Memorial August 29, 2014 September 4, 2014 Thursday after 1:00 p.m. Labor

366

1998 SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule Proposal Deadline Schedule Announcement Experimental Period Duration Tue, Nov 11, 17:00 Wed, Nov 12, '97 17:00 Mon, Nov 17, '97 18:00-Wed, Nov 19, '97 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Dec 01, '97 17:00 Tue, Dec 02, '97 13:00 Mon, Dec 08, '97 06:00-Wed, Dec 10, '97 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Jan 05, 17:00 Tue, Jan 06, 13:00 Mon, Jan 12, 18:00-Wed, Jan 14, 02:00 32 hrs Fri, Jan 16, 17:00 Tue, Jan 20, 13:00 Mon, Jan 26, 06:00-Wed, Jan 28, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Feb 02, 17:00 Tue, Feb 03, 13:00 Tue, Feb 10, 18:00-Thu, Feb 12, 02:00 32 hrs Tue, Feb 17, 17:00 Wed, Feb 18, 17:00 Mon, Feb 23, 06:00-Wed, Feb 25, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Mar 02, 17:00 Tue, Mar 03, 13:00 Mon, Mar 09, 18:00-Wed, Mar 11, 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Mar 16, 17:00 Tue, Mar 17, 13:00 Mon, Mar 23, 06:00-Wed, Mar 25, 02:00 44 hrs

367

1997 SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule Proposal Deadline Schedule Announcement Experimental Period Duration Mon, Nov 11, '96 17:00 Tue, Nov 12, '96 13:00 Tue, Nov 19, '96 15:00-Wed, Nov 20, '96 02:00 11 hrs Mon, Dec 02, '96 17:00 Tue, Dec 03, '96 13:00 Mon, Dec 09, '96 06:00-Wed, Dec 11, '96 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Jan 06, 17:00 Tue, Jan 07, 13:00 Mon, Jan 13, 18:00-Wed, Jan 15, 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Jan 20, 17:00 Tue, Jan 21, 13:00 Mon, Jan 27, 06:00-Wed, Jan 29, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Feb 03, 17:00 Tue, Feb 04, 13:00 Tue, Feb 11, 18:00-Thu, Feb 13, 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Feb 18, 09:30 Tue, Feb 18, 13:00 Mon, Feb 24, 06:00-Wed, Feb 26, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Mar 03, 17:00 Tue, Mar 04, 13:00 Mon, Mar 10, 18:00-Wed, Mar 12, 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Mar 17, 17:00 Tue, Mar 18, 13:00 Mon, Mar 24, 06:00-Wed, Mar 26, 02:00 44 hrs

368

2000 SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule Proposal Deadline Schedule Announcement Experimental Period Duration Mon, Nov 08, '99 17:00 Tue, Nov 09, '99 13:00 Mon, Nov 15, '99 18:00-Wed, Nov 17, '99 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Nov 29, '99 17:00 Tue, Nov 30, '99 13:00 Mon, Dec 06, '99 06:00-Wed, Dec 08, '99 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Jan 03, 17:00 Tue, Jan 04, 13:00 Mon, Jan 10, 18:00-Wed, Jan 12, 02:00 32 hrs Fri, Jan 14, 17:00 Tue, Jan 18, 13:00 Mon, Jan 24, 06:00-Wed, Jan 26, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Feb 14, 17:00 Tue, Feb 15, 17:00 Tue, Feb 22, 06:00-Thu, Feb 24, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Feb 28, 17:00 Tue, Feb 29, 13:00 Mon, Mar 06, 18:00-Wed, Mar 08, 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Mar 13, 17:00 Tue, Mar 14, 13:00 Mon, Mar 20, 06:00-Wed, Mar 22, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Apr 10, 17:00 Tue, Apr 11, 13:00 Mon, Apr 17, 06:00-Wed, Apr 19, 02:00 44 hrs

369

2002 SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule Proposal Deadline Schedule Announcement Experimental Period Duration Mon, Nov 05, '01 17:00 Tue, Nov 06, '01 13:00 Mon, Nov 12, '01 18:00-Wed, Nov 14, '01 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Dec 03, '01 17:00 Tue, Dec 04, '01 13:00 Mon, Dec 10, '01 06:00-Wed, Dec 12, '01 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Dec 17, '01 09:00 Tue, Dec 18, '01 13:00 Mon, Jan 07, 18:00-Wed, Jan 9, 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Jan 14, 12:00 Tue, Jan 15, 13:00 Tue, Jan 22, 06:00-Thu, Jan 24, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Jan 28, 17:00 Tue, Jan 29, 17:00 Tue, Feb 05, 18:00-Thu, Feb 07, 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Feb 11, 17:00 Tue, Feb 12, 17:00 Tue, Feb 19, 06:00-Wed, Feb 20, 02:00 20 hrs Mon, Feb 25, 17:00 Tue, Feb 26, 13:00 Mon, Mar 04, 18:00-Wed, Mar 06, 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Mar 11, 17:00 Tue, Mar 12, 13:00 Mon, Mar 18, 06:00-Wed, Mar 20, 02:00 44 hrs

370

1999 SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule 9 SSRL Accelerator Physics Schedule Proposal Deadline Schedule Announcement Experimental Period Duration Mon, Nov 30, '98 17:00 Tue, Dec 01, '98 13:00 Mon, Dec 07, '98 06:00-Wed, Dec 09, '98 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Jan 04, 17:00 Tue, Jan 05, 13:00 Mon, Jan 11, 18:00-Wed, Jan 13, 02:00 32 hrs Fri, Jan 15, 17:00 Tue, Jan 19, 13:00 Mon, Jan 25, 06:00-Wed, Jan 27, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Feb 01, 17:00 Tue, Feb 02, 13:00 Tue, Feb 09, 18:00-Thu, Feb 11, 02:00 32 hrs Tue, Feb 16, 17:00 Wed, Feb 17, 17:00 Mon, Feb 22, 06:00-Wed, Feb 24, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Mar 01, 17:00 Tue, Mar 02, 13:00 Mon, Mar 08, 18:00-Wed, Mar 10, 02:00 32 hrs Mon, Mar 15, 17:00 Tue, Mar 16, 13:00 Mon, Mar 22, 06:00-Wed, Mar 24, 02:00 44 hrs Mon, Apr 12, 17:00 Tue, Apr 13, 13:00 Mon, Apr 19, 06:00-Wed, Apr 21, 02:00 44 hrs

371

Control of Records  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 Control of Records Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 6 3 Control of Records Process 11_0304 Page 1 of 6 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Control of Records Process Document Number P-003 Rev 11_0304 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: Q-001, Quality Manual Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): REG-003, Records Register P-003 Control of Records Process 11_0304 Page 2 of 6 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 08_0805 Added Integration Group to Section III. 11_0304 Defined Record Creator and New Record for clarity and swapped Step 3.0 and 4.0 P-003 Control of Records Process 11_0304 Page 3 of 6 I. Purpose To describe the process for how records are established and maintained to provide evidence of conformity to requirements and

372

Final Demolition and Disposition of 209-E Critical Mass Laboratory - 12267  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 209-E Critical Mass Laboratory was constructed in 1960 to provide a heavy shielded reactor room where quantities of plutonium or uranium in solution could be brought to near-critical configurations under carefully controlled and monitored conditions. In the late 1980's, the responsible contractor, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), was directed by the Department of Energy (DOE) to prepare the facility for unoccupied status. The facility was demolished under a Removal Action Work Plan pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The funding for this project was provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The primary rooms of concern with regards to contamination in 209-E facility, which is over 9,000 square feet, are the criticality assembly room (CAR), the mix room, and the change room. The CAR contained two reactor hoods (HO-140 and HO-170), which each had a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter system. The CAR contained 13 tanks ranging from 38 L (10 gal) to 401 L (106 gal). Tanks TK-109 and TK-110 are below grade, and were removed as part of this demolition and disposition remedy. Nonradiological and radiological hazardous substances were removed, decontaminated, or fixed in place, prior to demolition. Except for the removal of below grade tanks TK-109 and TK-110, the facility was demolished to slab-on-grade. PNNL performed stabilization and deactivation activities that included removal of bulk fissile material and chemicals, flushing tanks, stabilizing contamination within gloveboxes and hoods, and packaging and removing waste. The removal of the contaminated plutonium equipment and materials from the 209E facility presented a number of challenges similar in nature to those associated with the inventory reduction and cleanup activities at the Plutonium Finishing Plant. Although there were no bulk fissile materials or chemicals within the facility, there were residual radiological materials (isotopes of plutonium and americium) in the tanks and hoods. The complexity of the remedy was present because of the various configurations of the tanks and hoods, combined with the residual contaminants. Because of the weight and dimensional configuration, size reduction of the slab tanks, as well as removal and disposal of the different material used for moderation and absorption, were two examples of challenges that were resolved to complete the remedy. One of the key methods developed and implemented at the facility was the design and construction of a shroud to allow the cutting of the Pu contaminated tanks. The shroud design, development and implementation at the 209E Project was an example of enhanced work planning and task hazards analysis with worker involvement. This paper will present the lessons learned from the 209E facility inventory reduction activities including the shroud and other methodologies used. The initial Lessons Learned discussion for this project was scheduled for late January 2012. This facility is the first open-air demolition of a highly contaminated plutonium-contaminated facility accomplished by CH2M Hill under the Plateau Remediation Contract. The demolition was completed without spread of contamination to the workers and the surrounding area. As with any project of this complexity, there are significant accomplishments, as well as experience that can be applied to future demolition of plutonium-contaminated facilities on the Hanford Site. These experiences will be documented at a later date. (authors)

Woolery, Wade [US Department of Energy, Richland WA (United States); Dodd, Edwin III [CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company, Richland WA (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Development of a Techno-Economic Model to Optimize DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Spent Nuclear Fuel (NSNF) Program is evaluating final disposition of spent nuclear fuel (SNE) in the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. Final disposition of SNF may require that the fuel be treated to minimize material concerns. The treatments may range from electrometallurgical treatment (EMT) and chemical dissolution to engineering controls. Treatment options and treatment locations will depend on fuel type and location of the fuel. One of the first steps associated with selecting one or more sites for treating SNF in the DOE complex is to determine the cost of each option. An economic analysis will assist in determining which fuel treatment alternative attains the optimum disposition of SNF at the lowest possible cost to the government and the public. For this study, a set of questions was developed for the EMT process for fuels at several locations. The set of questions addresses all issues associated with design, construction, and operation of a production facility. A matrix table was developed to determine questions applicable to various fuel treatment options. A work breakdown structure (WBS) was developed to identify a treatment process and costs from initial design to shipment of treatment products to final disposition. Costs can be applied to determine the life cycle cost of each option. This technique can also be applied to other treatment techniques for treating SNF.

Ramer, R. J.; Plum, M. M.; Adams, J. P.; Dahl, C. A.

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

EIS-0283-S2: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This EIS analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with changes to the surplus plutonium disposition program, including changes to the inventory of surplus plutonium and proposed new alternatives. The original EIS is available at http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0283-final-environmental-impact-sta....

375

Plutonium-bearing materials feed report for the DOE Fissile Materials Disposition Program alternatives  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report has identified all plutonium currently excess to DOE Defense Programs under current planning assumptions. A number of material categories win clearly fan within the scope of the MD (Materials Disposition) program, but the fate of the other categories are unknown at the present time. MD planning requires that estimates be made of those materials likely to be considered for disposition actions so that bounding cases for the PEIS (Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement) can be determined and so that processing which may be required can be identified in considering the various alternatives. A systematic analysis of the various alternatives in reachmg the preferred alternative requires an understanding of the possible range of values which may be taken by the various categories of feed materials. One table identifies the current total inventories excess to Defense Program planning needs and represents the bounding total of Pu which may become part of the MD disposition effort for all materials, except site return weapons. The other categories, principally irradiated fuel, rich scrap, and lean scrap, are discussed. Another table summarizes the ranges and expected quantities of Pu which could become the responsibility of the MD program. These values are to be used for assessing the impact of the various alternatives and for scaling operations to assess PEIS impact. Determination of the actual materials to be included in the disposition program will be done later.

Brough, W.G. [Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States); Boerigter, S.T. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States)

1995-04-06T23:59:59.000Z

376

Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief II: Iterated Belief Change without Dispositional Coherence  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......University Press 2003 Original Article Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief...Iterated Belief Change without Dispositional Coherence Hans Rott 1 1 Department of Philosophy...based on the conclusions of Rott, Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief......

Hans Rott

2003-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

IDENTIFYING IMPURITIES IN SURPLUS NON PIT PLUTONIUM FEEDS FOR MOX OR ALTERNATIVE DISPOSITION  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides a technical basis for estimating the level of corrosion products in materials stored in DOE-STD-3013 containers based on extrapolating available chemical sample results. The primary focus is to estimate the levels of nickel, iron, and chromium impurities in plutonium-bearing materials identified for disposition in the United States Mixed Oxide fuel process.

Allender, J; Moore, E

2010-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

378

Used fuel disposition campaign international activities implementation plan.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The management of used nuclear fuel and nuclear waste is required for any country using nuclear energy. This includes the storage, transportation, and disposal of low and intermediate level waste (LILW), used nuclear fuel (UNF), and high level waste (HLW). The Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC), within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology (FCT), is responsible for conducting research and development pertaining to the management of these materials in the U.S. Cooperation and collaboration with other countries would be beneficial to both the U.S. and other countries through information exchange and a broader participation of experts in the field. U.S. participation in international UNF and HLW exchanges leads to safe management of nuclear materials, increased security through global oversight, and protection of the environment worldwide. Such interactions offer the opportunity to develop consensus on policy, scientific, and technical approaches. Dialogue to address common technical issues helps develop an internationally recognized foundation of sound science, benefiting the U.S. and participating countries. The UNF and HLW management programs in nuclear countries are at different levels of maturity. All countries utilizing nuclear power must store UNF, mostly in wet storage, and HLW for those countries that reprocess UNF. Several countries either utilize or plan to utilize dry storage systems for UNF, perhaps for long periods of time (several decades). Geologic disposal programs are at various different states, ranging from essentially 'no progress' to selected sites and pending license applications to regulators. The table below summarizes the status of UNF and HLW management programs in several countriesa. Thus, the opportunity exists to collaborate at different levels ranging from providing expertise to those countries 'behind' the U.S. to obtaining access to information and expertise from those countries with more mature programs. The U.S. fuel cycle is a once through fuel cycle involving the direct disposal of UNF, as spent nuclear fuel, in a geologic repository (previously identified at Yucca Mountain, Nevada), following at most a few decades of storage (wet and dry). The geology at Yucca Mountain, unsaturated tuff, is unique among all countries investigating the disposal of UNF and HLW. The decision by the U.S. Department of Energy to no longer pursue the disposal of UNF at Yucca Mountain and possibly utilize very long term storage (approaching 100 years or more) while evaluating future fuel cycle alternatives for managing UNF, presents a different UNF and HLW management R&D portfolio that has been pursued in the U.S. In addition, the research and development activities managed by OCRWM have been transferred to DOE-NE. This requires a reconsideration of how the UFDC will engage in cooperative and collaborative activities with other countries. This report presents the UFDC implementation plan for international activities. The DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) has cooperated and collaborated with other countries in many different 'arenas' including the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) within the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and through bilateral agreements with other countries. These international activities benefited OCRWM through the acquisition and exchange of information, database development, and peer reviews by experts from other countries. DOE-NE cooperates and collaborates with other countries in similar 'arenas' with similar objectives and realizing similar benefits. However the DOE-NE focus has not typically been in the area of UNF and HLW management. This report will first summarize these recent cooperative and collaborative activities. The manner that the UFDC will cooperate and collaborate in the future is expected to change as R&D is conducted regarding long-term storage and the potential disposal of UNF and HLW in different geolo

Nutt, W. M. (Nuclear Engineering Division)

2011-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

379

Plans and Schedules | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appliance & Equipment Standards » About » Plans and Schedules Appliance & Equipment Standards » About » Plans and Schedules Plans and Schedules The Appliances and Equipment Standards program maintains a multi-year rulemaking schedule. The currently scheduled rulemaking activities are described in the program's semi-annual implementation report to Congress. The program will also issue other plans and schedules when needed. The most recent 5-year plan was released in October 2010 and outlines how the program planned to meet all the statutory requirements established in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended. Expedited Rulemakings In November 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) adopted new procedures that enable certain rulemakings to be expedited or improve the efficiency of the rulemaking process:

380

Definition: Net Interchange Schedule | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Interchange Schedule Interchange Schedule Jump to: navigation, search Dictionary.png Net Interchange Schedule The algebraic sum of all Interchange Schedules with each Adjacent Balancing Authority.[1] Related Terms Balancing Authority, Adjacent Balancing Authority, Interchange, Interchange Schedule, smart grid References ↑ Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards An inli LikeLike UnlikeLike You like this.Sign Up to see what your friends like. ne Glossary Definition Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Definition:Net_Interchange_Schedule&oldid=502531" Categories: Definitions ISGAN Definitions What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

APS Long Range Operations Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2) 2) Alternate Formats: iCal | Excel | PDF APS Long-Range Operation Schedule 2011-3 2012-1 2012-2 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

382

APS Long Range Operations Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1) 1) Alternate Formats: iCal | Excel | PDF APS Long-Range Operation Schedule 2010-3 2011-1 2011-2 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

383

APS Long Range Operations Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3) 3) Alternate Formats: iCal | Excel | PDF APS Long-Range Operation Schedule 2012-3 2013-1 2013-2 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

384

LLNL MOX fuel lead assemblies data report for the surplus plutonium disposition environmental impact statement  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to support the US Department of Energy (DOE) Fissile Materials Disposition Program`s preparation of the draft surplus plutonium disposition environmental impact statement. This is one of several responses to data call requests for background information on activities associated with the operation of the lead assembly (LA) mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility. The DOE Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (DOE-MD) has developed a dual-path strategy for disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. One of the paths is to disposition surplus plutonium through irradiation of MOX fuel in commercial nuclear reactors. MOX fuel consists of plutonium and uranium oxides (PuO{sub 2} and UO{sub 2}), typically containing 95% or more UO{sub 2}. DOE-MD requested that the DOE Site Operations Offices nominate DOE sites that meet established minimum requirements that could produce MOX LAs. LLNL has proposed an LA MOX fuel fabrication approach that would be done entirely inside an S and S Category 1 area. This includes receipt and storage of PuO{sub 2} powder, fabrication of MOX fuel pellets, assembly of fuel rods and bundles, and shipping of the packaged fuel to a commercial reactor site. Support activities will take place within a Category 1 area. Building 332 will be used to receive and store the bulk PuO{sub 2} powder, fabricate MOX fuel pellets, and assemble fuel rods. Building 334 will be used to assemble, store, and ship fuel bundles. Only minor modifications would be required of Building 332. Uncontaminated glove boxes would need to be removed, petition walls would need to be removed, and minor modifications to the ventilation system would be required.

O`Connor, D.G.; Fisher, S.E.; Holdaway, R. [and others

1998-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

Scheduling of a parallel workload: Implementation and use of the argonne easy scheduler at PDC  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Scheduling of a workload of parallel jobs on a large parallel computer puts specific demands on a scheduling system. Especially if the objective is to give a good service for the largest parallel jobs. In this pa...

Lars Malinowsky; Per ster

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

386

Robustness in Combinatorial Optimization and Scheduling Theory ...  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ten years in the area of combinatorial optimization and scheduling theory .... with robust reformulation of optimization model by adapting robust control...

2006-09-26T23:59:59.000Z

387

Scheduling with Fixed Maintenance, Shared Resources and ...  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nov 17, 2014 ... The resulting problem is a non-linear scheduling problem with .... Once the grade control plan is constructed we need to solve the utilization...

2014-11-24T23:59:59.000Z

388

EM Quality Assurance Assessment Schedule FY 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Attached for planning and coordination purposes is the updated Quality Assurance(QA) assessment schedule for the remainder of fiscal year (FY) 2010.

389

Rate Schedule PACI-T3  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

receipt, adjusted for losses, and delivered to points of delivery. This service includes scheduling and system control and dispatch service needed to support the transmission...

390

Proposal Submittal and Scheduling Procedures Entry Page  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Proposal Submittal and Scheduling Procedures for Research at SSRL X-rayVUV Macromolecular Crystallography SSRL is funded by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy...

391

Machine scheduling using the Bees algorithm.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??Single-machine scheduling is the process of assigning a group of jobs to a machine. The jobs are arranged so that a performance measure, such as (more)

Phrueksanant, Janyarat

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Construction project scheduling problem with uncertain resource ...  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

... on-going activities. 7 Conclusions and future work .... constrained construction scheduling, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 13(3),. 207-216. [23] Liu...

2004-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

Work Schedules | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

job performance, improve morale and help reduce work-related stress, as well as reduce air pollution and traffic congestion. Participation in either the alternate work schedule...

394

Renewable Fuel Standard Schedule | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Standard Schedule Standard Schedule Jump to: navigation, search Name Renewable Fuel Standard Schedule Sector Liquid Transportation Fuels Spatial Resolution National Geographic Scope United States Temporal Resolution Annual The United States Environmental Protection Agency, under the National Renewable Fuel Standard program and as required by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), periodically revises the volumetric standards for cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel that must be used in transportation fuel each year. The table below lists the current RFS2 schedule in billions of gallons: Year Renewable Biofuel Advanced Biofuel Cellulosic Biofuel Biomass-based Diesel Undifferentiated Total 2008 9 9

395

EIS-0026: Amendment to a Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Amendment to a Record of Decision Amendment to a Record of Decision EIS-0026: Amendment to a Record of Decision Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Phase The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to revise its approach for managing approximately 0.97 metric tons (MT) of plutonium-bearing materials (containing about 0.18 MT of surplus plutonium) that are currently located at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS). The Department has decided to repackage and transport these materials for direct disposal as transuranic waste (TRUW) at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico instead of shipping them to the Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina for storage pending possible disposition. DOE/EIS-0026, Amendment to a Record of Decision for the Waste Isolation

396

APS Long Range Schedule 2000  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

APS FY2000 Beamline Operations Schedule APS FY2000 Beamline Operations Schedule JAN Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Week 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 0000-0800 SM SM SM SM SM MS MS 0800 - 1600 SM SM SM SM MS MS MS 1600 - 2400 SM SM SM SM MS MS MS Week 2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0000 - 0800 MS MS MS UO UO UO UO 0800 - 1600 MS MS UO UO UO UO UO 1600 - 2400 MS MS UO UO UO UO UO Week 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 0000 - 0800 UO UO UO UO UO UO UO 0800 - 1600 UO MS UO UO UO UO UO 1600 - 2400 UO UO UO UO UO UO UO JAN/FEB 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 0000 - 0800 UO MS MS UO UO UO UO 0800 - 1600 MS MS UO UO UO UO UO 1600 - 2400 MS MS UO UO UO UO UO Week 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 0000 - 0800 UO UO UO UO UO UO UO

397

Environmental surveillance master sampling schedule  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains the planned 1994 schedules for routine collection of samples for the Surface Environmental Surveillance Project (SESP), Drinking Water Project, and Ground-Water Surveillance Project. Samples are routinely collected for the SESP and analyzed to determine the quality of air, surface water, soil, sediment, wildlife, vegetation, foodstuffs, and farm products at Hanford Site and surrounding communities. The responsibility for monitoring the onsite drinking water falls outside the scope of the SESP. The Hanford Environmental Health Foundation is responsible for monitoring the nonradiological parameters as defined in the National Drinking Water Standards while PNL conducts the radiological monitoring of the onsite drinking water. PNL conducts the drinking water monitoring project concurrent with the SESP to promote efficiency and consistency, utilize the expertise developed over the years, and reduce costs associated with management, procedure development, data management, quality control and reporting. The ground-water sampling schedule identifies ground-water sampling events used by PNL for environmental surveillance of the Hanford Site.

Bisping, L.E.

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

398

Schedule optimization study implementation plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Implementation Plan is intended to provide a basis for improvements in the conduct of the Environmental Restoration (ER) Program at Hanford. The Plan is based on the findings of the Schedule Optimization Study (SOS) team which was convened for two weeks in September 1992 at the request of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (RL). The need for the study arose out of a schedule dispute regarding the submission of the 1100-EM-1 Operable Unit (OU) Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Work Plan. The SOS team was comprised of independent professionals from other federal agencies and the private sector experienced in environmental restoration within the federal system. The objective of the team was to examine reasons for the lengthy RI/FS process and recommend ways to expedite it. The SOS team issued their Final Report in December 1992. The report found the most serious impediments to cleanup relate to a series of management and policy issues which are within the control of the three parties managing and monitoring Hanford -- the DOE, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology). The SOS Report identified the following eight cross-cutting issues as the root of major impediments to the Hanford Site cleanup. Each of these eight issues is quoted from the SOS Report followed by a brief, general description of the proposed approach being developed.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

Genetic-based scheduling to solve the parcel hub scheduling problem  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The parcel hub scheduling problem (PHSP) is scheduling problem that is common in the parcel delivery industry. The PHSP consists of scheduling a set of inbound trailers containing a batch of heterogeneous parcels to a set of unload docks with the objective ... Keywords: Distribution, Genetic algorithm, Parcel, Sortation, Work load balancing

Douglas L. McWilliams

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Electronic Records Keeping...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

System (LMRHS01) - Electronic Records Keeping System, Office of Legacy Management, LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Electronic Records Keeping System, Office of Legacy...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record, Record # 13008: Industry...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Record 13008: Industry Deployed Fuel Cell Powered Lift Trucks DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record, Record 13008: Industry Deployed Fuel Cell Powered Lift Trucks...

402

An Optimal General Purpose Scheduler for Networked Control Systems  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

An Optimal General Purpose Scheduler for Networked Control Systems Ahmed Elmahdi , Ahmad F Taha to control the time delay is to im- prove the scheduling criterion. This paper proposes an optimal scheduling the stability of the control system. The proposed optimal schedul- ing protocol is a hybrid scheduling criterion

Sun, Dengfeng

403

Amended Record of Decision: Storage of Surplus Plutonium Materials at the Savannah River Site (DOE/EIS-0229)(09/11/07)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

07 Federal Register 07 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices 1 A container that complies with DOE-STD-3013, Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium- Bearing Materials. 2 The use of FFTF and the unirradiated fuel currently at Hanford is being considered in conjunction with the evaluation of reasonable alternatives in the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Programmatic EIS. The planned shipment of the FFTF unirradiated fuel to SRS is scheduled for the second half of Fiscal Year 2009. If FFTF is still being considered as part of GNEP following completion of the PEIS (expected in 2008), DOE may choose not to ship the unirradiated FFTF fuel to SRS. 3 Based on DOE's current surplus plutonium disposition plans, DOE expects to disposition the

404

Used fuel disposition research and development roadmap - FY10 status.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Since 1987 the U.S. has focused research and development activities relevant to the disposal of commercial used nuclear fuel and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) owned spent nuclear fuel and high level waste on the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. At the same time, the U.S. successfully deployed a deep geologic disposal facility for defense-related transuranic waste in bedded salt at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. In 2009 the DOE established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) within the Office of Nuclear Energy. The Mission of the UFDC is to identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The U.S. national laboratories have participated on these programs and has conducted research and development related to these issues to a limited extent. However, a comprehensive research and development (R&D) program investigating a variety of geologic media has not been a part of the U.S. waste management program since the mid 1980s. Such a comprehensive R&D program is being developed in the UFDC with a goal of meeting the UFDC Grand Challenge to provide a sound technical basis for absolute confidence in the safety and security of long-term storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel and wastes from the nuclear energy enterprise. The DOE has decided to no longer pursue the development of a repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Since a repository site will ultimately have to be selected, sited, characterized, designed, and licensed, other disposal options must now be considered. In addition to the unsaturated volcanic tuff evaluated at Yucca Mountain, several different geologic media are under investigation internationally and preliminary assessments indicate that disposal of used nuclear fuel and high level waste in these media is feasible. Considerable progress has been made in the U.S. and other nations in understanding disposal concepts in different geologic media, but gaps in knowledge still exist. A principal aspect of concern to the UFDC as it considers the broad issues of siting a repository in different geologic media are the marked differences in the regulatory bases for assessing suitability and safety of a repository between the U.S. and other nations. Because the probability based - risked informed nature of the current U.S. regulations for high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel is sufficiently different from other regulations, information gained in previous studies, while useful, likely need to be supplemented to enable more convincing communication with the public, better defense of the numerical models, and stronger safety cases. Thus, it was recognized when the UFDC was established that there were readily identified disposal-related R&D opportunities to address knowledge gaps. An effort to document these research opportunities was a key component of Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 engineered system, natural system, and system-level modeling activities for a range of disposal environments. A principal contribution to identifying these gaps was a workshop held to gather perspectives from experts both within and external to the UFDC regarding R&D opportunities. In the planning for FY2010 it was expected that these activities would culminate with a UFDC research and development roadmap that would identify the knowledge gaps, discuss the R&D needed to fill these gaps, and prioritize the proposed R&D over both the near- and long-term. A number of knowledge gaps and needed R&D were identified and are discussed in this report. However, these preliminary R&D topics have not been evaluated in detail nor have they been prioritized to support future planning efforts. This will be completed in FY11 and the final UFDC Research and Development Roadmap will be completed. This report discusses proposed R&D topics in three areas related to repository siting, design, and performance: natural systems

Nutt, W. M. (Nuclear Engineering Division)

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

User_ViewRecords  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

User Records User Records © 2011 SuccessFactors, Inc. - 1 - SuccessFactors Learning Confidential. All rights reserved. Job Aid: Viewing User Records Purpose The purpose of this job aid is to guide users through the step-by-step process of viewing their records. Each task demonstrates viewing of different records. Task A. View To-Do List Enter the web address (URL) of the user application into your browser Address field and press the Enter key. Enter your user ID in the User ID textbox. Enter your password in the Password textbox. Click Sign In. View To-Do List (filter, view) 7 Steps Task A View Completed Work 8 Steps Task B View Curriculum Status and Details 11 Steps Task C 3 3 1 2 2 1 SuccessFactors Learning v 6.4 User Job Aid Viewing User Records

406

Records Management | The Ames Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Training, Documents, & Records Records Management The Records Management Program at the Ames Laboratory provides guidance and assistance for administrative departments and...

407

Retail Store Scheduling for Profit Nicolas Chapadosa  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Retail Store Scheduling for Profit Nicolas Chapadosa , Marc Joliveaub , Pierre L'Ecuyera , Louis for retail stores has received relatively scant attention. Current approaches typically attempt to minimize the retail scheduling problem in terms of operating profit maximization, explicitly recognizing the dual role

L'Ecuyer, Pierre

408

Online Deadline Scheduling with Bounded Energy Efficiency  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Online Deadline Scheduling with Bounded Energy Efficiency Joseph Wun-Tat Chan1 , Tak-Wah Lam 2 concern when compared to throughput and the schedules targeted may be very poor in energy efficiency subject to a user-defined threshold of energy efficiency. We first show that all deterministic online

Wong, Prudence W.H.

409

PROJECT SCHEDULING: IMPROVED APPROACH TO INCORPORATE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

] project scheduling inevitably involves uncertainty. The basic inputs (i.e., time, cost, and resourcesPROJECT SCHEDULING: IMPROVED APPROACH TO INCORPORATE UNCERTAINTY USINC BAYESIAN NETWORKS VAHID, there is a causal relationship between these uncertainty sources and project parameters; this causality

Neil, Martin

410

Modeling realistic hybrid flexible flowshop scheduling problems  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper aims to contribute to the recent research efforts to bridge the gap between the theory and the practice of scheduling by modelizing a realistic manufacturing environment and analyzing the effect of the inclusion of several characteristics ... Keywords: Hybrid flexible flowshop, Precedence constraints, Realistic scheduling, Sequence-dependent setup times

Rubn Ruiz; Funda Sivrikaya ?erifo?lu; Thijs Urlings

2008-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) LONG RANGE SCHEDULE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and Machinery C T C T EET 365W Electrical Power & Machinery Laboratory C C, V V C C, V V EET 370T Energy=Virtual Laboratory, W=Web based This schedule is tentative. All Course offerings are subject to minimum enrollmentElectrical Engineering Technology (EET) LONG RANGE SCHEDULE Course Number and Name Fall 2010 Spr

412

Operations scheduling in job-shops  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This thesis is in the area of operations scheduling in an automated or semi-automated job-shop system, where parts with various routings contend for service on the resources in the system. The classical job-shop scheduling problem has usually been...

Srinivasan, Anand

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

413

Interpreting Deer Harvest Records.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

I Texas A&M versity System Agricultural Extension Service Zerle L. Carpenter. Director College Station B-1486 People Helping People Interpreting Deer Harvest Records LIB ARY Dwight f. Guynn* JUN 11 1985 Deer harvest records... are extremely important to proper deer herd man- agement. Because deer are difficult to observe and cannot be handled regularly like livestock, records are one of the few means available to determine deer herd . health, nutrition levels, trends...

Guynn, Dwight E.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

Alternative technical summary report for immobilized disposition in deep boreholes: Immobilized disposal of plutonium in coated ceramic pellets in grout without canisters, Version 4.0. Fissile materials disposition program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper summarizes and compares the immobilized and direct borehole disposition alternatives previously presented in the alternative technical summary. The important design concepts, facility features and operational procedures are first briefly described. This is followed by a discussion of the issues that affect the evaluation of each alternative against the programmatic assessment criteria that have been established for selecting the preferred alternatives for plutonium disposition.

Wijesinghe, A.M.

1996-08-23T23:59:59.000Z

415

Records Management Specialist  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A successful candidate in this position will serve as a Records Management Specialist in the Richland Operations Office (RL), Assistant Manager for Mission Support (AMMS), Infrastructure, Services...

416

Records Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order sets forth requirements and responsibilities for implementing and maintaining a cost-effective records management program throughout the Department of Energy.

2006-02-03T23:59:59.000Z

417

Records Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order sets forth requirements and responsibilities for establishing and maintaining a program for the efficient and economical management of records and information assets.

2011-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

418

Correcting Privacy Act Records  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Correcting-Privacy-Act-Records Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects &...

419

2002 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

420

1996 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

2005 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

422

2012 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

423

ARM - Written Records  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PastWritten Records Outreach Home Room News Publications Traditional Knowledge Kiosks Barrow, Alaska Tropical Western Pacific Site Tours Contacts Students Study Hall About ARM...

424

2010 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

425

2013 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

426

1999 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

427

2011 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1-Records-of-Decision Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

428

45329 SCHEDULING POSTER.ai  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

These courses have immediate open registraton These courses have immediate open registraton PLEASE LOOK FOR US AT http://energy.gov/dvu/professional-skills-and-technical-training OFFICE OF LEARNING & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT Professional Skills & Technical Training Program FY 2014 Corporate Schedule Points of Contact: If you have any logistical/registration questions please contact: Shira Kimble at 202-586-8449 or 301-903-5116. Course Title: Course Date: Time: CHRIS Code: Session: Location: Trustworthy Customer Services NEW January 15-16, 2014 8:30am-4:00pm 002452 0001 Forrestal RM GH- 043 CSRS Retirement Seminar January 28-30, 2014 8:30am-4:00pm 000033 0091 Forrestal RM GH- 043 Managing Up Down & Across February 11-12, 2014

429

SLAC - KEK: ISG8 Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Agenda Agenda ISG8 Home Page Working Groups: WG1: Parameters, Design, Instrumentation and Tuning, Bldg.212 Cascades Conference Rm. WG2: Damping Rings and ATF, Bldg.214 Fuji Conference Rm WG3: RF Sources, Orange Rm (half) WG4:Structures, Orange Rm (half) WG5: Ground Motion; Site Requirements and Investigations, Bldg.281 Conventional Facilities Rm. Monday: 09:00 Plenary Sessions (Auditorium) Welcome - J. Dorfan Views from KEK - K. Takata TRC News - G. Loew Goals for ISG-8 - D. Burke / N. Toge Working Group Plans (5 min ea) - WG Conveners 11:00 Working Group Sessions 12:00 Lunch 13:30 Working Group Sessions Tuesday: 09:00 Daily Schedule Update (Orange Rm) - WG Conveners (5min ea) 09:30 Working Group Sessions 12:00 Lunch 13:30 Working Group Sessions Wednesday:

430

Inspection/Sampling Schedule | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Inspection/Sampling Schedule Inspection/Sampling Schedule Inspection/Sampling Schedule Site Inspection and Water Sampling Schedules Note: The following schedules are subject to change without prior notice and will be updated periodically. Site Name Inspection Date Sampling Week Ambrosia Lake, NM, Disposal Site August 18, 2014 November 20, 2013 Bluewater, NM, Disposal Site August 18, 2014 November 20, 2013 January 28, 2014 May 12, 2014 Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS), PR, Decommissioned Reactor Site Next event 2017 Burrell, PA, Disposal Site December 9, 2013 November 20, 2013 Canonsburg, PA, Disposal Site December 9, 2013 November 19, 2013 Durango, CO, Disposal Site May 19, 2014 June 2, 2014 Durango, CO, Processing Site N/A June 2, 2014 September 1, 2014 Edgemont, SD, Disposal Site June 23, 2014 N/A

431

Routine Operational Environmental Monitoring schedule, CY 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides Health Physics (HP) a schedule in accordance with the Environmental Compliance Manual, WHC-CM-7-5, of monitoring and sampling routines for the Operational Environmental Monitoring (OEM) Program during calendar year (CY) 1994. The survey frequencies for particular sites are determined by the technical judgment of EES and may depend on the site history, radiological status, use, and general conditions. Additional surveys may be requested at irregular frequencies if conditions warrant. All radioactive waste sites are scheduled to be surveyed annually at a minimum. Any newly discovered waste sites not documented by this schedule will be included in the revised schedule for CY 1995. This schedule does not discuss the manpower needs nor does it list the monitoring equipment to be used in completing specific routines.

Schmidt, J.W.

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Distributed and Networked Dynamic Resource Allocation, Scheduling, and Control Experiments  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Distributed and Networked Dynamic Resource Allocation, Scheduling, and Control Experiments Nicanor into decentralized and networked dynamic resource allocation, scheduling, and control. 2 Questions 1. What, "Experiments for decentralized and networked dynamic resource allocation, scheduling, and control," Submitted

433

Enhancing feedback process scheduling via a predictive control approach  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Enhancing feedback process scheduling via a predictive control approach Alessandro Vittorio the application possibilities at an affordable additional cost. Keywords: feedback scheduling; control that preemptive process schedulers in multitasking operating systems can be viewed, and above all designed

Como, Giacomo

434

Energy Efficiency Exchange 2015 Schedule | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Schedule Energy Efficiency Exchange 2015 Schedule The schedule for Energy Efficiency Exchange 2015 is available below. Monday, August 10, 2015 12 p.m.-5:30 p.m. Registration...

435

CTV-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CTV-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule CTV-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Tennessee Valley Authority System: CU This rate schedule shall be available to the Tennessee...

436

CBR-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CBR-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule CBR-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule Area: Big Rivers and Henderson, KY System: CU This rate schedule shall be available to Big Rivers...

437

EIS-0203: Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Multi-Purpose Canister or Comparable System for Idaho National Engineering Multi-Purpose Canister or Comparable System for Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Spent Nuclear Fuel (May 1999) This Record of Decision announces the Department of Energy's (DOE's) decision to use a multi-purpose canister or comparable system for spent nuclear fuel at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). Except for those fuels that may be processed (e.g., sodium bonded fuel) and a small fraction of spent nuclear fuel (10% or less) that may be suitable for shipment using existing transportation casks, a multi-purpose canister or comparable system will be used for the loading and storage of DOE-owned spent nuclear fuel at the INEEL, and transportation of this spent nuclear fuel for ultimate disposition outside the State of Idaho.

438

EIS-0220: Supplemental Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Materials at the Savannah River Site Materials at the Savannah River Site The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS), ''Interim Management of Nuclear Materials'' (DOE/EIS-0220, October 20, 1995), to assess the potential environmental impacts of actions necessary to manage nuclear materials at the Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, South Carolina, until decisions on their ultimate disposition are made and implemented. Some of the particular materials considered in the EIS could present environment, safety and health vulnerabilities in their current storage condition. DOE/EIS-0220, Savannah River Operations Office; Interim Management of Nuclear Materials at the Savannah River Site, Supplemental Record of Decision (September 1996) More Documents & Publications

439

doeadm-17.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 17: CARTOGRAPHIC, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC, ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, AND FACILITY MANAGEMENT RECORDS March 2008 Revision 1 DOE creates and receives cartographic, aerial photographic, architectural, and engineering design records in connection with official activities. Many of these records have continuing historical value after they are no longer of use to the Department. This records schedule covers only disposable records. Guidelines for identifying and scheduling the records of continuing value are provided in "Managing Cartographic and Architectural Records: An Instructional Guide." This Guide must be used in conjunction with this schedule to ensure proper disposition of all Departmental cartographic,

440

Microsoft Word - ADM 17  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ADM 17 ADM 17 Rev 2 September 2010 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 17: CARTOGRAPHIC, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC, ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, AND FACILITY MANAGEMENT RECORDS September 2010 Revision 2 DOE creates and receives cartographic, aerial photographic, architectural, and engineering design records in connection with official activities. Many of these records have continuing historical value after they are no longer of use to the Department. This records schedule covers only disposable records. Guidelines for identifying and scheduling the records of continuing value are provided in "Managing Cartographic and Architectural Records: An Instructional Guide." This Guide must be used in conjunction with this schedule to ensure proper disposition of all Departmental cartographic,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING RECORDS INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULES (RIDS) Revision 1 November 1, 2007 Records Management Division, IM-23 PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING RECORDS INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULES (RIDS) 1. If the records have not yet been inventoried, see "Procedure for Conducting a Records Inventory." An inventory must be completed prior to preparing the RIDS. 2. The Records Inventory and Disposition Schedules (RIDS) should be reviewed and updated at least annually on DOE F 1324.10 and DOE F 1324.9. The RIDS covers all record, administrative and programmatic, as well as non- record material. The RIDS must include: a. Complete and detailed information identifying the organization (s) responsible for the records.

442

Preliminary Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) for the Calcine Disposition Project Volume 2 (CDP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PRELIMINARY TECHNOLOGY PRELIMINARY TECHNOLOGY OF THE CALCINE Prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy ECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT ALCINE DISPOSITION PROJECT VOLUME TWO Anthony F. Kluk Hoyt C. Johnson Clyde Phillip McGinnis Michael Rinker Steven L. Ross Herbert G. Sutter John Vienna February 2011 Prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC SSESSMENT ROJECT 412.09 (06/03/2009 - Rev. 11) CALCINE DISPOSITION PROJECT TECHNOLOGY MATURATION PLAN Identifier: Revision*: Page: PLN-1482 2 C-1 of C-317 Appendix C Appendix C Checklists for Critical Technology Elements and Technology Readiness Levels This appendix provides the CTE and TRL checklists for the CTEs. For the TRL questions that receive a "Y" (yes) response, the supporting documentation is provided with a complete reference at the

443

Portugal Egypt Figure 2. Natural gas supply and disposition in the United States, 2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Portugal Egypt Figure 2. Natural gas supply and disposition in the United States, 2012 (trillion cubic feet) Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Gross Withdrawals From Gas and Oil Wells Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed Vented/Flared Reservoir Repressuring Production Dry Gas Imports Canada Trinidad/Tobago Natural Gas Storage Facilities Exports Japan Canada Mexico Additions Withdrawals Gas Industry Use Residential Commercial Industrial Vehicle Fuel Electric Power 29.5 0.8 0.2 3.3 2.963 0.112 0.620 0.971 0.014 24.1 1.3 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.9 7.2 0.03 9.1 0.003 Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-176, "Annual Report of Natural and Supplemental Gas Supply and Disposition"; Form EIA-895, "Annual Quantity and

444

DOE/EIS-0283; Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (11/1999)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 of 5 5 of 5 Final Environmental Impact Statement November 1999 Comment Response Document Volume III - Part B Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (SPD EIS) (DOE/EIS-0283) Locations of Candidate Sites: California, Idaho, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington Contacts: For further information on the SPD Final EIS contact: For information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Mr. G. Bert Stevenson, NEPA Compliance Officer Ms. Carol Borgstrom, Director Office of Fissile Materials Disposition Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health

445

Environmental Assessment Addendum Disposition of Additional Waste at the Paducah Site  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WASTE DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES AT THE PADUCAH SITE PADUCAH, KENTUCKY AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACTION: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed an environmental assessment addendum (DOE/EA-1339-A), which is incorporated herein by reference, for proposed disposition of 17,600 m 3 of waste from the Paducah Site in Paducah, Kentucky. It is anticipated that most of the waste would be transported for disposal at various locations in the United States. Based on the results of the impact analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the context of the

446

EIS-0283DS Supplement to the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Draft Environmental Impact Statement, April 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sheet Sheet Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Supplement to the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Supplement) (DOE/EIS-0283-DS) Locations of Candidate Sites: Idaho, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Washington Contacts: For further information on the Supplement contact: For further information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Mr. G. Bert Stevenson, NEPA Compliance Officer Office of Fissile Materials Disposition U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 23786 Washington, DC 20026-3786 Voice: (202) 586-5368 Ms. Carol Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance Office of Environment, Safety and Health U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW

447

Final Environmental Assessment for Waste Disposition Activities at the Paducah Site Paducah, Kentucky  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0-347(doc)/093002 0-347(doc)/093002 1 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WASTE DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES AT THE PADUCAH SITE PADUCAH, KENTUCKY AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACTION: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has completed an environmental assessment (DOE/EA-1339), which is incorporated herein by reference, for proposed disposition of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) wastes, low-level radioactive waste (LLW), mixed low- level radioactive waste (MLLW), and transuranic (TRU) waste from the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Site (Paducah Site) in Paducah, Kentucky. All of the wastes would be transported for disposal at various locations in the United States. Based on the results of the impact analysis reported in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is

448

DOE/EIS-0283; Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (11/1999)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 of 5 4 of 5 Final Environmental Impact Statement November 1999 Comment Response Document Volume III - Part A Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: United States Department of Energy (DOE) Title: Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (SPD EIS) (DOE/EIS-0283) Locations of Candidate Sites: California, Idaho, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington Contacts: For further information on the SPD Final EIS contact: For information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Mr. G. Bert Stevenson, NEPA Compliance Officer Ms. Carol Borgstrom, Director Office of Fissile Materials Disposition Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environment, Safety and Health

449

U.S. weapons-usable plutonium disposition policy: Implementation of the MOX fuel option  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A comprehensive case study was conducted on the policy problem of disposing of US weapons-grade plutonium, which has been declared surplus to strategic defense needs. Specifically, implementation of the mixed-oxide fuel disposition option was examined in the context of national and international nonproliferation policy, and in contrast to US plutonium policy. The study reveals numerous difficulties in achieving effective implementation of the mixed-oxide fuel option including unresolved licensing and regulatory issues, technological uncertainties, public opposition, potentially conflicting federal policies, and the need for international assurances of reciprocal plutonium disposition activities. It is believed that these difficulties can be resolved in time so that the implementation of the mixed-oxide fuel option can eventually be effective in accomplishing its policy objective.

Woods, A.L. [ed.] [Amarillo National Resource Center for Plutonium, TX (United States); Gonzalez, V.L. [Texas A and M Univ., College Station, TX (United States). Dept. of Political Science

1998-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Approximate resolution of a resource-constrained scheduling problem  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

hard resource-constrained scheduling problem which arises in relation to .... schedules in which the temperature is allowed to increase. 5 ...... Systems & Control.

451

A Mathematical approach applied to train scheduling in Brazilian ...  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Abstract In this paper, a mathematical approach was used to schedule trains in ... Nowadays, due this criticality, the main decision about the train schedule over.

2014-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

452

Parallel machine match-up scheduling with manufacturing cost considerations  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

approach for the single machine scheduling problem. Journaldecisions on parallel CNC machines: -constraint approach.mechanism for the CNC machine scheduling problems with

Aktrk, M. Selim; Atamtrk, Alper; Grel, Sinan

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

CSI-1-H Wholesale Power Rate Schedule | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Area: Southern Illinois System: CU This rate schedule shall be available to Southern Illinois Power Cooperative (hereinafter the Customer). This rate schedule shall be...

454

DOE Radiation Records Contacts List  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE radiation records contact list for individuals to obtain records of occupational exposure directly from a DOE site.

455

Low-level Waste Safely Dispositioned Under Runoff Cover at SRS | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Low-level Waste Safely Dispositioned Under Runoff Cover at SRS Low-level Waste Safely Dispositioned Under Runoff Cover at SRS Low-level Waste Safely Dispositioned Under Runoff Cover at SRS April 26, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis The liner installer heat-welds a sand anchor closed. The sand anchors are installed under the liner and across the length of the slit trench to keep the liner in place and minimize the effects of wind lift. The liner installer heat-welds a sand anchor closed. The sand anchors are installed under the liner and across the length of the slit trench to keep the liner in place and minimize the effects of wind lift. A view of the Slit Trenches 1-4 operational cover in E Area. A view of the Slit Trenches 1-4 operational cover in E Area. The liner installer heat-welds a sand anchor closed. The sand anchors are installed under the liner and across the length of the slit trench to keep the liner in place and minimize the effects of wind lift.

456

Microsoft PowerPoint - FY09_11 Disposition Plan_090804  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

to 2011 FIMS Disposition to 2011 FIMS Disposition Plan Phil Dalby, P.E., LEED AP Facilities Engineer Office of Engineering and Construction Management U. S. Department of Energy August 4, 2009 2 FY 2009 to FY 2011 Disposition Plan RPV # Of Assets GSF RPV # Of Assets Gross Sq Feet FY 02 N/A N/A N/A $322,545,118 379 1,533,715 - $2,914,059 $322,545,118 FY 03 N/A N/A N/A $313,800,817 420 1,140,524 - $2,166,996 $636,345,935 FY 04 N/A N/A N/A $678,724,838 536 2,878,328 - $5,468,823 $1,315,070,773 FY 05 $1,029,311,442 473 4,111,764 $1,047,538,247 488 4,101,396 102% $7,792,652 $2,362,609,020 FY 06 $788,456,532 270 1,773,232 $1,352,580,138 625 2,800,679 172% $5,321,290 $3,715,189,158 FY 07 $550,347,778 208 1,414,961 $595,332,143 243 1,568,969 108% $2,981,041 $4,310,521,301 FY 08 $312,272,791 114 782,388 $1,029,579,616 219 1,418,007 330%

457

Transportation requirements for the disposition of excess weapon plutonium by burning in fission reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Both the US and Russia are planning to dispose of about 50 Mg of excess weapon plutonium over a 25-year period. One option is to transfer the plutonium to Advanced Light Water (power) Reactors (ALWRs) for use as fuel. Subsequent disposal would then be considered commercial spent fuel. This disposition option, like others, involves the transportation of plutonium in various material forms as it proceeds through various points in the recovery operation. This paper examines both the disposition option and the issues surrounding the transportation of 50 Mg of excess plutonium within the US under current regulatory and infrastructure constraints. Transportation issues include criticality control, shielding, and containment of the contents. Allowable limits on each of these issues are specified by the applicable (or selected) regulation. The composition and form of the radioactive materials to be transported will determine, in part, the applicable portions of the regulations as well as the packaging design. The regulations and the packaging design, along with safeguard and security issues, will determine the quantity of plutonium or fuel assemblies per package as well as the number of packages per shipment and the type of highway carrier. For the disposition of 50 Mg of weapon plutonium using ALWRs in a 25-year campaign, the annual shipment rates are determined for the various types of carriers.

Hovingh, J.; Walter, C.E.

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Study of plutonium disposition using existing GE advanced Boiling Water Reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The end of the cold war and the resulting dismantlement of nuclear weapons has resulted in the need for the US to dispose of 50 to 100 metric tons of excess of plutonium in a safe and proliferation resistant manner. A number of studies, including the recently released National Academy of Sciences (NAS) study, have recommended conversion of plutonium into spent nuclear fuel with its high radiation barrier as the best means of providing permanent conversion and long-term diversion resistance to this material. The NAS study ``Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium identified Light Water Reactor spent fuel as the most readily achievable and proven form for the disposition of excess weapons plutonium. The study also stressed the need for a US disposition program which would enhance the prospects for a timely reciprocal program agreement with Russia. This summary provides the key findings of a GE study where plutonium is converted into Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuel and a typical 1155 MWe GE Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) is utilized to convert the plutonium to spent fuel. A companion study of the Advanced BWR has recently been submitted. The MOX core design work that was conducted for the ABWR enabled GE to apply comparable fuel design concepts and consequently achieve full MOX core loading which optimize plutonium throughput for existing BWRs.

Not Available

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

Development of a techno-economic model to optimization DOE spent nuclear fuel disposition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the National Spent Nuclear Fuel (NSNF) Program conducted by Lockheed Martin Idaho Technology Co. (LMITCO) at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) is to evaluate what to do with the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. Final disposition of the SNF may require that the fuel be treated to minimize material concerns. The treatments may range from electrometallurgical treatment and chemical dissolution to engineering controls. Treatment options and treatment locations will depend on the fuel type and the current locations of the fuel. One of the first steps associated with selecting one or more sites for treating the SNF in the DOE complex is to determine the cost of each option. An economic analysis will assist in determining which fuel treatment alternative attains the optimum disposition of SNF at the lowest possible cost to the government and the public. For this study, a set of questions was developed for the electrometallurgical treatment process for fuels at several locations. The set of questions addresses all issues associated with the design, construction, and operation of a production facility. A matrix table was developed to determine questions applicable to various fuel treatment options. A work breakdown structure (WBS) was developed to identify a treatment process and costs from initial design to shipment of treatment products to final disposition. Costs will be applied to determine the life-cycle cost of each option. This technique can also be applied to other treatment techniques for treating spent nuclear fuel.

Ramer, R.J.; Plum, M.M.; Adams, J.P.; Dahl, C.A.

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

460

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - 21510 of 28,905 results. 01 - 21510 of 28,905 results. Page Disposition Schedules The DOE Records Disposition Schedules provide the authority for the transfer, or disposal of records created and maintained by the Department of Energy. The Disposition Schedules, and the citations... http://energy.gov/cio/guidance/records-management/disposition-schedules Download CX-001634: Categorical Exclusion Determination Meteorological Tower Installation Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwa Indian Reservation CX(s) Applied: B3.1, A9 Date: 04/08/2010 Location(s): County of Mille Lacs, Minnesota Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/cx-001634-categorical-exclusion-determination Page Communication & Engagement EM provides clear, timely, and consistent communication on the mission and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, DC 20408  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, DC 20408 1. F R O M (Agency or establishment) Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 2. MAJOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY (See ~nstructions on reverse) 3. M I N O R SUBDIVISION LEAVE BLANK JOB N O . H / - % ~ ~ L J - - !If'-7 D A T E R E C E I V E D /z-=4g NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a the di$posal request, including amendments, is approved except for items that may be marked "disposition not approved" or "withdrawn" in column 10. If no records are proposed for disposal, the signature of the Archivist is not reauired. I , I 4. N A M E O F PERSON W I T H W H O M T O CONFER 1 5 . TELEPHONE E X T . I D A T E I hereby certify that I am authorized t

462

Rate Schedule CV-RFS4  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

RFS4 RFS4 (Supersedes Schedule CV-RFS3) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT SCHEDULE OF RATE FOR REGULATION AND FREQUENCY RESPONSE SERVICE Effective: October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2016. Available: Within the marketing area served by the Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region. Applicable: To customers receiving Regulation and Frequency Response Service (regulation). Character and Conditions of Service: Regulation is necessary to provide for the continuous balancing of resources and interchange with load and for maintaining scheduled interconnection frequency at 60-cycles per second. Formula Rate: The formula rate for regulation includes three components:

463

Office of Enterprise Assessments Operational Awareness Record...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

support systems for the melter and offgas systems, resulted in high consequences (Risk Rank I and II) to co- located workers and the public. EA will evaluate the disposition of...

464

Fundamentals of Magnetic Recording  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In recent years magnetic recording has become a preferred medium for storing information such as printed language, mathematics, sound, and pictures. It is compact, economical, easily updated, and instantly ret...

Marvin Camras

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Fundamentals of Stereo Recording  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Stereophonic sound, or stereo as it is usually called, refers generally to any system of recording or sound transmission using multiple microphones and loudspeakers. Signals picked up by the microphones are route...

John M. Eargle

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

2007 Records of Decision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of Decision Tribal Affairs 2007 Records of Decision October 5, 2007 - Klondike III Wind Project Power Purchase ROD (PDF, 14 pages, 136 KB) July 19, 2007 - NEPA Long-Term...

467

Definition: Scheduling Path | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Scheduling Path Scheduling Path Jump to: navigation, search Dictionary.png Scheduling Path The Transmission Service arrangements reserved by the Purchasing-Selling Entity for a Transaction.[1] Related Terms transmission lines, Purchasing-Selling Entity, Transmission Service, transmission line References ↑ Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards An inl LikeLike UnlikeLike You like this.Sign Up to see what your friends like. ine Glossary Definition Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Definition:Scheduling_Path&oldid=480301" Categories: Definitions ISGAN Definitions What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link Browse properties 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation:

468

Definition: Interchange Schedule | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Schedule Schedule Jump to: navigation, search Dictionary.png Interchange Schedule An agreed-upon Interchange Transaction size (megawatts), start and end time, beginning and ending ramp times and rate, and type required for delivery and receipt of power and energy between the Source and Sink Balancing Authorities involved in the transaction.[1] Related Terms Interchange transaction References ↑ Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards An LikeLike UnlikeLike You like this.Sign Up to see what your friends like. inline Glossary Definition Retrieved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Definition:Interchange_Schedule&oldid=480572" Categories: Definitions ISGAN Definitions What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link

469

DOE HQ Shuttle Bus Route and Schedule  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Shuttle Bus Route and Schedule Shuttle Bus Route and Schedule The DOE Shuttle Buses follow the same schedules between the two main Headquarters locations, Forrestal and Germantown. The buses start their routes at each Headquarters facility at the same times, see the schedule below. The subsequent stops at the other facilities are relative to the departure time of each route. Headquarters employees are reminded of the statutory provisions that authorize and limit the use of the shuttle bus service. Specific authority for the use of appropriated funds to pay for transportation for official purposes is contained in section 1344(a)(1) of Title 31, U.S. Code. Use of this transportation for any other purpose is

470

Undergraduate Program Time Limits and Work Schedules  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Time Limits and Work Schedules Time Limits and Work Schedules Undergraduate Program Time Limits and Work Schedules Point your career towards LANL: work with the best minds on the planet in an inclusive environment that is rich in intellectual vitality and opportunities for growth. Contact Student Programs (505) 665-8899 Email Time limits The length of participation in the undergraduate program is limited to a maximum of six years for students pursuing a bachelor's degree and three years for students pursuing an associate's degree. Work schedules Year-round students Students participating in some special undergraduate programs, post-baccalaureate appointments, post-master's appointments, and GRA students working on a thesis or dissertation are excluded from the 30-hour per week work restriction.

471

Graduate Program Time Limits and Work Schedules  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Time Limits and Work Schedules Time Limits and Work Schedules Graduate Program Time Limits and Work Schedules Point your career towards LANL: work with the best minds on the planet in an inclusive environment that is rich in intellectual vitality and opportunities for growth. Contact Student Programs (505) 665-8899 Email Time Limits The length of participation in the graduate program is limited as follows: With a bachelor's pursuing a master's degree: 4 years With a bachelor's pursuing a PhD: 7 years With a master's pursuing a second master's degree: 2 years With a master's pursuing a PhD: 4 years With a master's pursuing a master's and PhD in a new field: 6 years Students may remain in the GRA program for up to three months after receiving their PhD. Work schedules Year-round students Students participating in the MBA program, post-baccalaureate appointments,

472

APCF Construction Schedule | Advanced Photon Source  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

APCF APCF Past APCF Memoranda APCF, Construction Schedule This is a tentative schedule of the daily construction at APCF. For the preliminary two to three week look ahead schedule, please click the PDF calendar to the left. The potential for ground vibration is noted in the "Impact" column (None, Small, Moderate, High, Very High). Daily schedule for dates up to 01.17.2014 Day Activity Impact Monday - 08.05.13 Studs and Drywall None Ceiling Piping None Curtain Wall None Site Grading Low Tuesday - 08.06.13 Studs and Drywall None Ceiling Piping None Curtain Wall None Landscaping Low Wednesday - 08.07.13 Studs and Drywall None Ceiling Piping None Curtain Wall None Landscaping Low Thursday - 08.08.13 Studs and Drywall None Ceiling Piping None Curtain Wall None

473

Batch Queues and Scheduling Policies on Edison  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Queues and Policies Queues and Scheduling Policies Users submit jobs to a submit queue and wait in line until nodes become available to run a job. NERSC's queue structures are...

474

Transportation resource scheduling in food retail industry  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The objective of this thesis is to find an appropriate analytical method for scheduling the daily driver tasks in the grocery industry. The goal is to maximize driver utilization. A "Bin-packing" approach is employed to ...

Akkas, Arzum, 1978-

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

475

Production Scheduling with Energy Efficiency Constraints  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This research is motivated by a real world production scheduling problem in a continuous manufacturing system involving multiple objectives, multiple products and multiple processing lines with various inventory, production and energy efficiency...

Lee, J.; Kozman, T. A.; Wang, X.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

DOE Announces New WIPP Tour Schedule  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Announces New WIPP Tour Schedule CARLSBAD, N.M., March 14, 2001 - The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office today announced changes in the public tour program at...

477

Provably Efficient Adaptive Scheduling for Parallel Jobs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Scheduling competing jobs on multiprocessors has always been an important issue for parallel and distributed systems. The challenge is to ensure global, system-wide efficiency while offering a level of fairness to user ...

He, Yuxiong

478

PARS II Training Schedule | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

will certify that user to receive a PARS II user account. PARSIITrainingSchedule03-06-2014.pdf More Documents & Publications Slide 1 Slide 1 PARS II Course Registration Form...

479

Scheduling of Mobile Robots with Preemptive Tasks  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper deals with the problem of scheduling of mobile robots taking into account preemption cases in a ... capability of transporting materials between some machines, mobile robots are able to perform manufac...

Izabela Nielsen; Quang-Vinh Dang

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Online optimization in routing and scheduling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

In this thesis we study online optimization problems in routing and scheduling. An online problem is one where the problem instance is revealed incrementally. Decisions can (and sometimes must) be made before all information ...

Wagner, Michael R. (Michael Robert), 1978-

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "records disposition schedules" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

WEBVIEWER INSTRUCTION PACKET Facilities Planning and Scheduling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-mail: scheduling@mail.wvu.edu Website: http://facilitiesscheduling.wvu.edu http://webviewer.wvu.edu #12;2 WebViewer: Detailed Instructions Table of Contents Purpose of WebViewer.................................................................................................................................3 Tour of Web

Mohaghegh, Shahab

482

Rate Schedule CV-EID4  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EID4 EID4 (Supersedes Schedule CV-EID3) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT SCHEDULE OF RATE FOR ENERGY IMBALANCE SERVICE Effective: October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2016. Available: Within the marketing area served by the Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region. Applicable: To customers receiving Energy Imbalance (EI) service. Character and Conditions of Service: EI is provided when a difference occurs between the scheduled and the actual delivery of energy to a load within the Sub-Balancing Authority (SBA) over an hour or in accordance with approved policies and procedures. The deviation, in megawatts, is the net scheduled amount of

483

Project Schedule Optimization in a Telecommunications Environment  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Veritas Corporation is a thriving company in the fast-paced telecommunications industry. To keep up with the dynamic industry, a significant quantity of projects must be scheduled in a short time period without impacting ...

Taliaferro, Chris

2013-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

484

Optical sedimentation recorder  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A robotic optical sedimentation recorder is described for the recordation of carbon flux in the oceans wherein both POC and PIC particles are captured at the open end of a submersible sampling platform, the captured particles allowed to drift down onto a collection plate where they can be imaged over time. The particles are imaged using three separate light sources, activated in sequence, one source being a back light, a second source being a side light to provide dark field illumination, and a third source comprising a cross polarized light source to illuminate birefringent particles. The recorder in one embodiment is attached to a buoyancy unit which is capable upon command for bringing the sedimentation recorder to a programmed depth below the ocean surface during recordation mode, and on command returning the unit to the ocean surface for transmission of recorded data and receipt of new instructions. The combined unit is provided with its own power source and is designed to operate autonomously in the ocean for extended periods of time.

Bishop, James K.B.

2014-05-06T23:59:59.000Z

485

Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory & Y-12 for Transfer of Facilities & Materials to EM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Integrated Facilities Disposition Project Integrated Facilities Disposition Project Technical Assistance Page 1 of 2 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Y-12 National Security Complex Tennessee Tennessee Assessment of the Integrated Facility Disposition Project at ORNL & Y-12 for Transfer of Facilities & Materials to EM Challenge In December 2007, the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management (EM-1) invited the DOE Program Secretarial Offices (PSOs) of Nuclear Energy (NE), Science (SC), and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to propose facilities and legacy waste for transfer to Environmental Management (EM) for final disposition or deactivation and decommissioning (D&D). In parallel with the EM-1 initiative, the Oak Ridge Reservation was conducting a Critical

486

Knowledge-Based Design of Scheduling Systems Jrgen Sauer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

have to decide and control within the scheduling process. In different application areas scheduling1 Knowledge-Based Design of Scheduling Systems Jürgen Sauer Universität Oldenburg, FB Informatik Escherweg 2 D-26121 Oldenburg, Germany sauer@informatik.uni-oldenburg.de Abstract A Scheduling system shall

Appelrath, Hans-Jürgen

487

Survey of Gain-Scheduling Analysis & Design WE.Leithead  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ranging from aerospace to process control. Despite the wide application of gain-scheduling controllers of gain-scheduling controllers and a diverse academic literature relating to gain- scheduling extendingSurvey of Gain-Scheduling Analysis & Design D.J.Leith WE.Leithead Department of Electronic

Duffy, Ken

488

Microsoft Word - ADM 21  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ADM 21 REV 2 September 2010 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21: AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS September 2010 Revision 2 This schedule covers audiovisual and related records created by or for Department and those acquired in the normal course of business. For audiovisual records that are not described in this schedule, an SF 115, Request for Records Disposition Authority, must be submitted to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Audiovisual records include still and motion picture photography, graphic materials, and sound and video recordings. Related documentation includes (1) production files or other files documenting the creation, justification, ownership, and rights to the records and (2)

489

DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Program Record, Record # 11003, Fuel...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Fuel Cell Technologies Program Record Record : 11003 Date: March 8, 2011 Title: Fuel Cell Stack Durability Originator: Jacob Spendelow, Dimitrios Papageorgopoulos, and John Garbak...

490

ANL-W MOX fuel lead assemblies data report for the surplus plutonium disposition environmental impact statement  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to support the US Department of Energy (DOE) Fissile Materials Disposition Program`s preparation of the draft surplus plutonium disposition environmental impact statement (EIS). This is one of several responses to data call requests for background information on activities associated with the operation of the lead assembly (LA) mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility. The DOE Office of fissile Materials Disposition (DOE-MD) has developed a dual-path strategy for disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. One of the paths is to disposition surplus plutonium through irradiation of MOX fuel in commercial nuclear reactors. MOX fuel consists of plutonium and uranium oxides (PuO{sub 2} and UO{sub 2}), typically containing 95% or more UO{sub 2}. DOE-MD requested that the DOE Site Operations Offices nominate DOE sites that meet established minimum requirements that could produce MOX LAs. The paper describes the following: Site map and the LA facility; process descriptions; resource needs; employment requirements; wastes, emissions, and exposures; accident analysis; transportation; qualitative decontamination and decommissioning; post-irradiation examination; LA fuel bundle fabrication; LA EIS data report assumptions; and LA EIS data report supplement.

O`Connor, D.G.; Fisher, S.E.; Holdaway, R. [and others

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

491

Social Media Records and You  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Managing Social Media Records Managing Social Media Records Managing Social Media Records What is Social Media? Your Responsibilities As a DOE federal or contractor Employee your basic records obligations are to: Follow the Lifecycle Records Management Lifecycle Create or receive official records needed to do business Social Media, Web 2.0, and Gov 2 0 bring together technology obligations are to: Planning for the use of Social Media should address records management requirements. Create or Capture records A RECORD is a RECORD is a RECORD, no matter what is used to create or receive it. Ensure that your records are maintained so that they are accessible and easy to retrieve. 2.0 bring together technology, social interaction, and content creation (from USA.gov). DOE uses social media both

492

Microsoft Word - ADM 20  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20 20 REV 2 September 2010 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 20: ELECTRONIC RECORDS September 2010 Revision 2 This schedule authorizes the disposition of specified electronic records and hard-copy or microform records and are integrally related to them. The electronic records may either be created or received. Included are records created by computer operators, programmers, analysts, systems administrators, and all personnel with access to a computer. Disposition authority is provided for certain master files, including some tables that are components of data base management systems, and certain files created from master files for specific purposes. In addition, this schedule covers certain disposable electronic records produced by end users in office automation applications. These disposition authorities apply to the

493

FILM AND VIDEO COLLECTION SCHEDULING REQUEST Date: Send To: Video Scheduling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FILM AND VIDEO COLLECTION SCHEDULING REQUEST Date: Requestor: Send To: Video Scheduling Film and Video Collection Department University of Delaware Library (302) 831-8419 FAX (302) 831-6197 Media within seven days, please check out media at the Film and Video Collection Department Service Desk

Cakoni, Fioralba

494

Disposition of toxic PCB congeners in snapping turtle eggs: expressed as toxic equivalents of TCDD  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Studies of snapping turtles, taken from the region of the Upper Hudson River, in New York State, revealed exceedingly high levels of PCBs in the adipose tissue. There is evidence to suggest that large reserves of fat provide protection against chlorinated hydrocarbon toxicity. Such storage may protect snapping turtle eggs from disposition of toxic PCB congeners and account for the apparent absence of reports regarding detrimental effects on the hatchability of eggs from turtles living in the vicinity of the upper Hudson River. The present study was undertaken to determine if indeed these eggs are protected against disposition of toxic PCB congeners by the presence of large reserves of fat. Although tissue volumes play an important role in determining the initial site of disposition, the major factor controlling the elimination of these compounds involves metabolism. For simple halogenated benzenes as well as for more complex halogenated biphenyls, oxidative metabolism catalyzed by P-448, occurs primarily at the site of two adjacent unsubstituted carbon atoms via arene oxide formation leading to the formation of water soluble metabolites. Toxicological studies have demonstrated that the most toxic PCB congeners, isosteriomers of tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), require no metabolic activation. These compounds have chlorine atoms in the meta and para positions of both rings. It may be concluded that the structures of PCB congeners and isomers which favor induction of cytochrome P-448 are also those which are toxic and resist metabolism. It is the objective of the present study to determine if the heavy fat bodies of the female turtle provide a sufficiently large sink to retain the toxic congeners and prevent their incorporation into the eggs.

Bryan, A.M.; Stone, W.B.; Olafsson, P.G.

1987-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

495

Reducing Pausing at Rich-to-Lean Schedule Transitions: Effects of Variable-Ratio Schedules and Noncontingent Timeouts  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-schedule component), which may maintain responding in the lean component when there is insufficient reinforcement. 4 General Introduction The Basic Problem: Pausing on FR Schedules Fixed-ratio (FR) schedules require that a certain number of responses occur.... In the context of a FR schedule, pausing may be considered counterproductive (or maladaptive) because it postpones the receipt of a reinforcer for a food-deprived organism. A host of variables affect pausing on FR schedules; for example, pausing increases as a...

Brewer, Adam Thornton

2012-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

496

Environmental Records.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TERMS TERMS ALARA as low as reasonably achievable CAA Clean Air Act CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CX categorical exclusion DOE U.S. Department of Energy EA environmental assessment ECL environmental checklist EIS environmental impact statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986 FFA&CO Federal Facility Agreement & Consent Order FRC Federal Records Center HEPA high-efficiency particulate air IB information bulletin MSDS material safety data sheet NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards Program NARA National Archives and Records Administration

497

Recording Scientific Knowledge  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The way we record knowledge, and the web of technical, formal, and social practices that surrounds it, inevitably affects the knowledge that we record. The ways we hold knowledge about the past - in handwritten manuscripts, in printed books, in file folders, in databases - shape the kind of stories we tell about that past. In this talk, I look at how over the past two hundred years, information technology has affected the nature and production of scientific knowledge. Further, I explore ways in which the emergent new cyberinfrastructure is changing our relationship to scientific practice.

Bowker, Geof (Santa Clara University) [Santa Clara University

2006-01-09T23:59:59.000Z

498

Bases, Assumptions, and Results of the Flowsheet Calculations for the Decision Phase Salt Disposition Alternatives  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The High Level Waste (HLW) Salt Disposition Systems Engineering Team was formed on March 13, 1998, and chartered to identify options, evaluate alternatives, and recommend a selected alternative(s) for processing HLW salt to a permitted wasteform. This requirement arises because the existing In-Tank Precipitation process at the Savannah River Site, as currently configured, cannot simultaneously meet the HLW production and Authorization Basis safety requirements. This engineering study was performed in four phases. This document provides the technical bases, assumptions, and results of this engineering study.

Dimenna, R.A.; Jacobs, R.A.; Taylor, G.A.; Durate, O.E.; Paul, P.K.; Elder, H.H.; Pike, J.A.; Fowler, J.R.; Rutland, P.L.; Gregory, M.V.; Smith III, F.G.; Hang, T.; Subosits, S.G.; Campbell, S.G.

2001-03-26T23:59:59.000Z

499

Records Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To set forth requirements and responsibilities for making and preserving records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the [Department of Energy (DOE)] and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and persons directly affected by [DOE] activities.

2011-11-07T23:59:59.000Z

500

Records Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order sets forth requirements and responsibilities for creating and preserving records of DOE organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions and information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and persons directly affected by DOE activities. Cancels DOE O 243.1A and DOE O 243.2. Adm Chg 1, 7-8-13.

2013-03-11T23:59:59.000Z