Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Savannah River Operations Office Interim Management of Nuclear  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 1997 / Notices 1 The term ''failed'' means that the cladding on the fuel has been breached. The ROD, 60 Fed. Reg. 65300 (December 19, 1995), stated that failed fuel is indicated by gas releases from a fuel storage canister or visible failure of the cladding or canisters. select samples for specialized surveys for example on children's services or on access for persons with disabilities. [FR Doc. 97-9341 Filed 4-10-97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Savannah River Operations Office Interim Management of Nuclear Materials at the Savannah River Site AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Supplemental record of decision and supplement analysis determination. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared a final

2

Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations, January 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of the of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 2

3

Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations, January 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Review of the Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations January 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 2

4

U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide [Fulfills ORO Safety Basis Competency 1, 2 (Part 1), or 7 (Part 1)] U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide [Fulfills ORO Safety Basis Competency 1, 2 (Part 1), or 7 (Part 1)] "This self-study guide provides an overview of safety basis terminology, requirements, and activities that are applicable to DOE and Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) nuclear facilities on the Oak Ridge Reservation. By completing this self-study guide, the reader will fulfill ORO Safety Basis Qualification Standard Competency 1, 2 (Part 1), or 7 (Part 1) and gain a familiarity level of knowledge regarding the following:

5

U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear Facility  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide [Fulfills ORO Safety Basis Competency 1, 2 (Part 1), or 7 (Part 1)] U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide [Fulfills ORO Safety Basis Competency 1, 2 (Part 1), or 7 (Part 1)] "This self-study guide provides an overview of safety basis terminology, requirements, and activities that are applicable to DOE and Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) nuclear facilities on the Oak Ridge Reservation. By completing this self-study guide, the reader will fulfill ORO Safety Basis Qualification Standard Competency 1, 2 (Part 1), or 7 (Part 1) and gain a familiarity level of knowledge regarding the following:

6

Savannah River Operations Office Interim Managemnet of Nuclear  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

099 099 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 1997 / Notices Barbara A. Carmichael, Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 97-29919 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3910-01-P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests AGENCY: Department of Education. ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request. SUMMARY: The Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January 13, 1998. ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests for copies of the proposed information collection requests should be addressed to Patrick J. Sherrill,

7

CERCLA Preliminary Assessment of DOE'S Nevada Operations Office Nuclear Weapons Testing  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

tudies/B ackground tudies/B ackground Book 1 CERCLA Preliminary Assessment of DOE'S Nevada Operations Office Nuclear Weapons Testing Areas Vol. 11, April 1988 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. CERCLA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF DOE'S NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE WCILEAR WEAPONS T E S r n G AREAS Prepared by Water Resources Center Desert Research Institute University of Nevada System ,Prepared for U . S . Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada under contract DE-AC08-85NV10384 A p r i l 1988 CONTENTS VOLUME I I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 11. NEVADA TEST SITE TESTING AREAS 2.1 Frenchman Flat (Area 5) 2.1.1 2.2 Yucca Flat (Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15)

8

Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices | National Nuclear Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nonproliferation Program Offices | National Nuclear Security Nonproliferation Program Offices | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices One of the gravest threats the United States and the international

9

Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nonproliferation Program Offices | National Nuclear Security Nonproliferation Program Offices | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices One of the gravest threats the United States and the international

10

Office of Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Nuclear Safety (HS-30) Office of Nuclear Safety (HS-30) Office of Nuclear Safety Home » Directives » Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy Rules » Nuclear Safety Workshops Technical Standards Program » Search » Approved Standards » Recently Approved » RevCom for TSP » Monthly Status Reports » Archive » Feedback DOE Nuclear Safety Research & Development Program Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design (HS-31) Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design - About Us » Nuclear Policy Technical Positions/Interpretations » Risk Assessment Working Group » Criticality Safety » DOE O 420.1C Facility Safety » Beyond Design Basis Events Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs (HS-32) Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs - About Us

11

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 25, 2011 January 25, 2011 CX-005187: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hex Block Shipment Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/25/2011 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office January 5, 2011 CX-004926: Categorical Exclusion Determination Radioactive Waste Management Complex ? Analytical Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 01/05/2011 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office December 10, 2010 CX-004645: Categorical Exclusion Determination CPP-663 Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B2.1 Date: 12/10/2010 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Idaho Operations Office November 16, 2010 CX-004561: Categorical Exclusion Determination Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center - Light Water Breeder

12

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 15, 2010 March 15, 2010 CX-001231: Categorical Exclusion Determination Test Reactor Area-653 Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning Modifications CX(s) Applied: B2.1, B2.5 Date: 03/15/2010 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Idaho Operations Office, Nuclear Energy March 15, 2010 CX-001230: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace 200,000 Gallon Water Storage Tank at Material Fuels Complex CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 03/15/2010 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Idaho Operations Office, Nuclear Energy March 11, 2010 CX-001229: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of Fluidized Beds by Pressure Fluctuation Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/11/2010 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Idaho Operations Office, Nuclear Energy February 23, 2010 CX-000865: Categorical Exclusion Determination

13

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 29, 2010 November 29, 2010 CX-004808: Categorical Exclusion Determination Flowsheet Evaluation for the Neutralization of High Aluminum ? Low Uranium Used Nuclear Fuel (UNF) Solution CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/29/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 29, 2010 CX-004809: Categorical Exclusion Determination Reactive Gas Reprocessing of Used Nuclear Fuel Simulants CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/29/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 29, 2010 CX-004806: Categorical Exclusion Determination Volume Measurement of Solids by Gas Pycnometry CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/29/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 12, 2010 CX-004805: Categorical Exclusion Determination

14

Office of Nuclear Threat Science | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Threat Science | National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Threat Science | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Nuclear Threat Science Home > About Us > Our Programs > Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation > Office of Nuclear Threat Science Office of Nuclear Threat Science

15

Arrangement between the Office for Nuclear Regulation of Great Britain and the United States Department of Energy for the Exchange of Information and Co-operation in the Area of Nuclear Safety Matters  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Arrangement between the Office for Nuclear Regulation of Great Britain and the United States Department of Energy for the Exchange of Information and Co-operation in the Area of Nuclear Safety Matters.

16

Office of Nuclear Safety - Directives  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear and Facility Safety Directives Nuclear and Facility Safety Directives The HSS Office of Nuclear Safety is the responsible office for the development, interpretation, and revision of the following Department of Energy (DOE) directives. Go to DOE's Directives Web Page to view these directives. DOE Order (O) 252.1A, Technical Standards Program DOE O 252.1A promotes DOE's use of Voluntary Consensus Standards (VCS) as the primary method for application of technical standards and establishes and manages the DOE Technical Standards Program (TSP) including technical standards development, information, activities, issues, and interactions. HS-30 Contact: Jeff Feit DOE Policy (P) 420.1, Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Policy DOE P 420.1, documents the Department's nuclear safety policy to design, construct, operate, and decommission its nuclear facilities in a manner that ensures adequate protection of workers, the public, and the environment.

17

The Office of Nuclear Verification | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear Verification | National Nuclear Security Nuclear Verification | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The Office of Nuclear Verification Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nonproliferation & International Security > The Office of Nuclear Verification The Office of Nuclear Verification

18

San Francisco Operations Office  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

San Francisco Operations Office San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway Oakland, California 94612 Dr. Joseph 0. Ward, Chief Radiological Health Section Department of Health Services 744 P Street Sacramento, California, 95814 SUBJECT: Certification Docket of Gilman Hall Dear Dr. Ward: The Department of Energy (DOE) has completed and reviewed the remedial ac- tions of Gilman Hall located at the University of California, Berkeley, California. Based on this review, DOE certifies that the condition of Gilman Hall is radiologically acceptable for restricted use under the con- trols of the University of California's State General License 1333-62 pro- vided that the University's Office of Environmental Health and Safety con- tinues to survey Gilman Hall and monitor whenever remodeling or renovation

19

Nevada Operations Office  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Nevada Operations Office Nevada Operations Office t' . 0. Box 14100, Las Vegas, NV 89114-4100 Lt. Col. Kent J. Rohlof; USAF Commander 554th Civil Engineering Support Squadron (TAC) Nellis Air Force Base, NV 89191 DISPOSAL OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE--NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE Layton O'Neill and Thomas Graham of my office recently visited two sites at Nellis AFB, Area II, identified as locations for burial of radioactive waste. The purpose of this visit was to visually inspect the physical status of the sites, one identified as the location of the subject liquid wastes. Numerous readings were made with a hand-held Ludlum Model 125 Micro-R meter, for the purpose of personnel radiation protection walking into the controlled, posted radioactive waste compounds. No readings were above background.

20

Office of Nuclear Threat Science | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Threat Science | National Nuclear Security Administration Threat Science | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Nuclear Threat Science Home > About Us > Our Programs > Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation > Office of Nuclear Threat Science Office of Nuclear Threat Science

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 24, 2011 February 24, 2011 CX-005504: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Methods for Radiochemical Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/24/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office February 24, 2011 CX-005503: Categorical Exclusion Determination Drain Line Replacement West of 735-A CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 02/24/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office February 24, 2011 CX-005502: Categorical Exclusion Determination Implement Savannah River National Laboratory Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 2004-2 Gap Closure Activity CX(s) Applied: B2.3 Date: 02/24/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

22

The Office of Nuclear Safeguards and Security | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Safeguards and Security | National Nuclear Security Safeguards and Security | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The Office of Nuclear Safeguards and Security Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nonproliferation & International Security > The Office of Nuclear Safeguards and Security The Office of Nuclear Safeguards and Security

23

Field Offices | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Offices | National Nuclear Security Administration Offices | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Field Offices Home > Field Offices Field Offices Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr Learn More Welcome to the Sandia Field Office Welcome to the Kansas City Field Office Welcome to the Livermore Field Office

24

Office of Nuclear Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NE Human Capital Plan Revised August 2006 U. S. Department of Energy NE Human Capital Plan i August 2006 Office of Nuclear Energy Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................................................................1 Background .................................................................................................................................................2 NE Human Capital Strategy.....................................................................................................................2 NE Human Capital Plan: At-A-Glance ..................................................................................................3

25

Office of Nuclear Warhead Protection | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Warhead Protection | National Nuclear Security Warhead Protection | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Office of Nuclear Warhead Protection Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices > Office of International Material Protection and Cooperation > Material Protection, Control and Accounting

26

Nevada Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nevada Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our Locations > Nevada Field Office Nevada Field Office http://www.nv.doe.gov/main.aspx Field Office: Located in Las Vegas, Nevada, the Nevada Field Office (NFO) oversees operations for the NNSA Nevada National Security Site. Due to the

27

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 28, 2011 November 28, 2011 CX-007774: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rensselaer Infrastructure Upgrade to Enhance Research and Education in Nuclear Engineering - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office November 28, 2011 CX-007773: Categorical Exclusion Determination An Integrated Upgrade of Scientific Equipment for Strengthening the Research and Education in Nuclear Energy at the Ohio State University CX(s) Applied: B1.2, B3.6 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office November 28, 2011 CX-007772: Categorical Exclusion Determination Idaho National Laboratory Asphalt Repair Project - North Wind Services, LLC CX(s) Applied: B1.3

28

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 7, 2011 November 7, 2011 CX-007671: Categorical Exclusion Determination Heat Exchanger Removal and Disposition CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 11/07/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 7, 2011 CX-007670: Categorical Exclusion Determination Maintenance Excavation of the B-07 Outfall Ditch CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/07/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 7, 2011 CX-007669: Categorical Exclusion Determination Vegetative Response to Metal Exposure in a Growing Media CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/07/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office October 27, 2011 CX-007672: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sampling of Nuclear Fuel Assembly CX(s) Applied: B3.6

29

Albuquerque Operations Office  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

%r © J~4 %r © J~4 aDepartment of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400 Albuquerue. New Mexico 87118 JUIl 0 198 Vicinity Property No. CA-401 _ U l Address; Mayer Street Bridgeville, Pennsylvania Cyclops Corporation 650 Washington Road Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15228 Dear Sir: Under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978, Public Law 95-604, the Department of Energy (DOE) is authorized to conduct remedial action at properties contaminated with residual radioactive material from inactive uranium mill sites. Evaluation of your property identified above has revealed the presence of residual radioactive material in excess of standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Therefore, your property has been formally included by DOE for remedial action in the Uranium Mill Tailings

30

U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Orders Self-Study Program Safety Basis Documentation Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1,...

31

Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Concurrence: 'WcVlUi. Date: - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - Charles C. Harris, Director, Performance Assurance Division J rey M. Allison, Director, Office of...

32

Workforce Statistics - Sandia Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Sandia Field Office | National Nuclear Security Sandia Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Sandia Field Office Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Sandia Field Office Workforce Statistics - Sandia Field Office

33

Workforce Statistics - Pantex Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Pantex Field Office | National Nuclear Security Pantex Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Pantex Field Office Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Pantex Field Office Workforce Statistics - Pantex Field Office

34

Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office

35

Workforce Statistics - Nevada Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nevada Field Office | National Nuclear Security Nevada Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Nevada Field Office Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Nevada Field Office Workforce Statistics - Nevada Field Office

36

Office of Nuclear Safety Basis and Facility Design  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design establishes safety basis and facility design requirements and expectations related to analysis and design of nuclear facilities to ensure protection of workers and the public from the hazards associated with nuclear operations.

37

Office of Security Operations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Physical Protection Office of Physical Protection Bill Dwyer Director, 202-586-7887 Mission The mission of the Office of Physical Protection is to implement and oversee dedicated human resources, processes, and equipment designed to protect personnel and assets entrusted to our care at Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters facilities. The Office is comprised of dedicated DOE Federal security professionals, Headquarters Protective Force personnel, and Alarms and Access Control Technicians. These security subject matter experts work together to ensure compliance with DOE Safeguards and Security regulations, Interagency Security Committee guidance, and federal laws. The result of this collaboration is a security program designed to ensure a safe and secure working environment for all Headquarters employees.

38

The Office of Nuclear Controls | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Controls | National Nuclear Security Administration Controls | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The Office of Nuclear Controls Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nonproliferation & International Security > The Office of Nuclear Controls The Office of Nuclear Controls Certain terrorist groups and states are attempting to acquire WMD dual-use

39

Richland Operations Office technology summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document has been prepared by the Department of Energy`s Environmental Management Office of Technology Development to highlight its research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation activities funded through the Richland Operations Office. Technologies and processes described have the potential to enhance cleanup and waste management efforts.

Not Available

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

Workforce Statistics - Office of Secure Transportation | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Office of Secure Transportation | National Nuclear Office of Secure Transportation | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Office of Secure Transportation Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Office of Secure

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Workforce Statistics - Los Alamos Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Los Alamos Field Office | National Nuclear Security Los Alamos Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Los Alamos Field Office Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Los Alamos Field Office

42

LANL counterintelligence officer speaks at Pantex | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

counterintelligence officer speaks at Pantex | National Nuclear counterintelligence officer speaks at Pantex | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > LANL counterintelligence officer speaks at Pantex LANL counterintelligence officer speaks at Pantex Posted By Office of Public Affairs LANL counterintelligence officer speaks at Pantex

43

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Operations Office...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Savannah River Operations Office - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Operations Office - July 2013 July 2013 Review of the Employee Concerns Program at the...

44

Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

treatment and the data should be available by the end of next week. * Status Conduct of Operations There have been several small incidents recently where observations of work...

45

U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide [Fulfills ORO Safety Basis Competency 1, 2 (Part 1), or 7 (Part 1)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

"This self-study guide provides an overview of safety basis terminology, requirements, and activities that are applicable to DOE and Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) nuclear facilities on the Oak...

46

Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

adverse impacts 40 CFR 1508.27 (b)(l): The selected action establishes a capability to conduct outdoor linac operations at higher power and greater standoff distances. The SOX...

47

Independent Oversight Inspection, Richland Operations Office, Office of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office, Richland Operations Office, Office of River Protection, and Project Hanford Management Contract - November 2006 Independent Oversight Inspection, Richland Operations Office, Office of River Protection, and Project Hanford Management Contract - November 2006 November 2006 Inspection of Classification and Information Control Programs at the Richland Operations Office, Office of River Protection, and Project Hanford Management Contract This report presents the results of inspection activities by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, Office of Security Evaluations in the area of classification and information control (CIC) at the two DOE offices at the Hanford Site-the Richland Operations Office (RL) and the Office of River Protection (ORP)-each of which

48

Office of Nuclear Safety Enforcement | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Enforcement Office of Nuclear Safety Enforcement Office of Nuclear Safety Enforcement MISSION The Office of Nuclear Safety Enforcement implements the Department's nuclear safety...

49

DOE Office of Nuclear Energy | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Office of Nuclear Energy DOE Office of Nuclear Energy DOE Office of Nuclear Energy More Documents & Publications Section 180(c) Ad Hoc Working Group Nuclear Fuel Storage and...

50

Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs establishes nuclear safety requirements related to safety management programs that are essential to the safety of DOE nuclear facilities.

51

Home Office Expenses Submitted by Fluor Federal Services, Inc., on Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC's U.S. Department of Energy Management & Operating (M&O) Contract No. DE-AC09-08SR22470  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Home Office Expenses Submitted by Fluor Home Office Expenses Submitted by Fluor Federal Services, Inc., on Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC's U.S. Department of Energy Management & Operating (M&O) Contract No. DE-AC09-08SR22470 OAS-L-13-08 April 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 19, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Home Office Expenses Submitted by Fluor Federal Services, Inc., on Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC's U.S. Department of Energy Management & Operating (M&O) Contract No. DE-AC09-08SR22470" BACKGROUND The attached report presents the results of an audit of home office expenses submitted by Fluor

52

Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Office of Acquisition Management (OAM)

53

Workforce Statistics - Savannah River Field Office | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Savannah River Field Office | National Nuclear Savannah River Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Savannah River Field Office Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Savannah River Field

54

Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Office of Acquisition Management (OAM)

55

Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Assessments  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Assessments conducts assessments to provide critical feedback and objective information on programs and performance in protecting our workers, the public and environment from radiological hazards with a focus on hazardous nuclear facilities and operations. This information provides assurance to our stakeholders and identifies areas for improvement to our leadership to support the safe performance of the Departments mission.

56

About Los Alamos Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Los Alamos Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog About Los Alamos Field Office Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Los Alamos Field Office > About Los Alamos Field Office About Los Alamos Field Office Los Alamos Field Office in the '50s About Los Alamos Field Office

57

Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Livermore Field Office Public Affairs Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Livermore Field Office > Livermore Field Office Public Affairs Livermore Field Office Public Affairs The LFO Office of Public Affairs is the primary point of contact between

58

Welcome to the Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Welcome to the Livermore Field Office Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Livermore Field Office Welcome to the Livermore Field Office The NNSA Livermore Field Office (LFO) is located at the Lawrence Livermore

59

Office of Nuclear Energy Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Request | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Office of Nuclear Energy Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Request Office of Nuclear Energy Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Request The Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) supports the diverse civilian...

60

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Manager for Nuclear Material Stabilization Project U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office Pat McGuire Patrick W. (Pat) McGuire was named the Assistant Manager...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Nuclear Facility Operations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Operations Facility Operations Nuclear Facility Operations INL is a science-based, applied engineering national laboratory dedicated to meeting the nation's environmental, energy, nuclear technology, and national security needs. INL is a science-based, applied engineering national laboratory dedicated to meeting the nation's environmental, energy, nuclear technology, and national security needs. The Idaho Operations Office oversees these contract activities in accordance with DOE directives. INL is a multi-program laboratory In addition to enabling the Office of Nuclear Energy to develop space power systems and advanced fuel cycle and reactor technologies, INL facilities are used by the National Nuclear Security Administration and other DOE offices, together with other Federal agencies such as the Department of

62

Office of Headquarters Security Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions for Headquarters; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive.

63

Office of National Infrastructure & Sustainability | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

National Infrastructure & Sustainability | National Nuclear National Infrastructure & Sustainability | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Office of National Infrastructure & Sustainability Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices > Office of International Material

64

Office of Material Consolidation & Civilian Sites | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Material Consolidation & Civilian Sites | National Nuclear Material Consolidation & Civilian Sites | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Office of Material Consolidation & Civilian Sites Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nonproliferation > Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Offices > Office of International Material

65

NNSA Office of General Counsel | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Office of General Counsel | National Nuclear Security Administration Office of General Counsel | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog NNSA Office of General Counsel Home > About Us > Our Operations > NNSA Office of General Counsel NNSA Office of General Counsel The NNSA Office of the General Counsel is responsible for the provision of legal services, counsel and support to the NNSA Administrator and all NNSA

66

Welcome to the Nevada Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nevada Field Office | National Nuclear Security Nevada Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Welcome to the Nevada Field Office Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Nevada Field Office Welcome to the Nevada Field Office The Nevada Field Office's website is currently at http://www.nv.energy.gov/main.aspx. Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version

67

Los Alamos Field Office Emergency Public Information | National Nuclear  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Field Office Emergency Public Information | National Nuclear Field Office Emergency Public Information | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Los Alamos Field Office Emergency Public Information Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Los Alamos Field Office > Los Alamos Field Office Emergency Public Information Los Alamos Field Office Emergency Public Information

68

Office of Headquarters Security Operations | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Headquarters Security Operations Office of Headquarters Security Operations Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting...

69

Welcome to the Sandia Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Sandia Field Office | National Nuclear Security Sandia Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Welcome to the Sandia Field Office Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Sandia Field Office Welcome to the Sandia Field Office Mission Strengthen National Security through contract administration and oversight,

70

Energy San Francisco Operations Office  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Depariment of ' Depariment of ' Energy San Francisco Operations Office 1333 Broadway Oakland, California 94612 FEB 6 1984 Mr. c:c. canners Energy Systems Group Rockwell International Corporation Post Office BOX 309 Canoga Park Dear 8 a CA 91304 G ers : Remedial action was taken to decontaminate the Hot Cave (Building 003) and Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) under Contract No. DE-AT03-76SF75008. The report of the post remedial survey, performed by Argonne National Laboratory, indicates that the levels of contamination are below the decontamination criteria agreed to between the State of California and DOE/SAN. Based on- this report and the enclosed letter from J. E. Baublitz to Dr. Wynveen, DOE/SAN is releasing for unrestricted use Building 003 and the SRE. Sincerely,

71

Chicago Operations Office: Technology summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document has been prepared by the Department of Energy`s (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Office of Technology Development (OTD) to highlight its research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation (RDDT and E) activities funded through the Chicago Operations Office. Technologies and processes described have the potential to enhance DOE`s cleanup and waste management efforts, as well as improve US Industry`s competitiveness in global environmental markets. The information has been assembled from recently produced OTD documents which highlight technology development activities within each of the OTD program elements. OTD technologies addresses three specific problem areas: (1) groundwater and soils cleanup; (2) waste retrieval and processing; and (3) pollution prevention. These problems are not unique to DOE, but are associated with other Federal agency and industry sites as well. Thus, technical solutions developed within OTD programs will benefit DOE, and should have direct applications in outside markets.

Not Available

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

Nuclear Safety Information Agreement Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, and the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On December 15, Matt Moury, Associate Under Secretary, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security (EHSS DOE) and EHSS Office of Nuclear Safety staff met with the NRC Executive Director for Operations, the Deputy Executive Director for Operations, and the Director, Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards to sign a nuclear safety information exchange agreement between NRC Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards and the Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security.

73

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Richland Operations Office - April 2011 April 2011 Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project HIAR-RL-2011-04-07 This Independent Activity Report...

74

Science Co-Operation Office, Middle East  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... THE Science Co-operation ... Co-operation Office, Middle East, of Unesco, in Cairo publishes a list of the scientific papers ...

1949-02-12T23:59:59.000Z

75

Independent Activity Report, Hanford Operations Office - July...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

assessment included evaluation of work control, fall protection, quality assurance, and conduct of operations. Independent Activity Report, Hanford Operations Office - July 2010...

76

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Idaho Operations Office Idaho Operations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Idaho Operations Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 11, 2013 CX-010699: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Boulevard Annex Lease Termination CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/11/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office July 11, 2013 CX-010698: Categorical Exclusion Determination Modeling and Validation of Sodium Plugging for Heat Exchangers in Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor Systems CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/11/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office June 25, 2013 CX-010701: Categorical Exclusion Determination Materials and Fuels Complex Diversion Dam CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 06/25/2013

77

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 20, 2011 June 20, 2011 CX-006372: Categorical Exclusion Determination Well Installations at R-Area Operable Unit CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 15, 2011 CX-006373: Categorical Exclusion Determination Connect 735-11A to the Central Plant Chilled Water System CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/15/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 14, 2011 CX-006375: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Transfer Lines with Spare Lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/14/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 14, 2011 CX-006374: Categorical Exclusion Determination

78

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 11, 2009 August 11, 2009 CX-000513: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cone Penetration Test sampling at ECODS (Early Construction and Operational Disposal Sites) B3 and B5 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 08/11/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office August 5, 2009 CX-000511: Categorical Exclusion Determination Isolation of Domestic Water Line, 782-4G CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/05/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office August 5, 2009 CX-000512: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tree Removal and Chipping at P-Area Ash Basin and R-Area Ash Basin and P-007 Outfall Date: 08/05/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

79

Office of Inertial Confinement Fusion | National Nuclear Security  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Inertial Confinement Fusion | National Nuclear Security Inertial Confinement Fusion | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Inertial Confinement Fusion Office of Inertial Confinement Fusion Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation > Office of Inertial Confinement Fusion

80

Customer Survey Office of Field Financial Management | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Customer Survey Office of Field Financial Management | National Nuclear Customer Survey Office of Field Financial Management | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Office of Financial Field Management > Customer Survey Office of Field Financial Management Customer Survey Office of Field Financial Management

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

The Hanford Site Richland Operations Office Office of River Protection Office of Science  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Hanford Site Richland Operations Office Office of River Protection Office of Science Plateau;HANFORDSMALLBUSINESSCOUNCIL Richland Operations Office Sally A. Sieracki Small Business Program Manager E-mail: sally.sieracki@rl.doe.gov Web Site: www.hanford.gov/rl Office of River Protection Susan C. Johnson Small Business Program

82

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEP A Compliance Officer Rationale NEP A Compliance Officer Rationale Pantex Site Office Proj. No.: MWO-ll-004-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-ll-0001 Parking Lot South of Bullding 16-35 Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusion B1.15, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart 0, Appendix B), applies to this proposal. Therefore, neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is necessary for the activity described in NEPA Review Form (NRF) PXP-II-000l, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, proposes to construct a permanent parking lot south of Building 16-35 on the Pantex Plant. The parking lot would be approximately 220 feet in length and 170 feet wide. Four metal culverts,

83

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Operations Savannah River Operations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Savannah River Operations Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 10, 2013 CX-010669: Categorical Exclusion Determination 484-17D Coal Yard Remediation CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 06/07/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 1, 2013 CX-010837: Categorical Exclusion Determination Disassembly, Relocation, and Reassembly of a Metal-framed Quonset Hut CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 1, 2013 CX-010836: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subcontractor Roof Repair at 717-12S CX(s) Applied: B1.3

84

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 23, 2009 June 23, 2009 CX-000497: Categorical Exclusion Determination F-Canyon Complex Deactivation CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 06/23/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 15, 2009 CX-000495: Categorical Exclusion Determination M-Area Chemical Oxidation (MACO) - Installation of Southern Sector Coreholes and Monitoring Wells Date: 06/15/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 15, 2009 CX-000496: Categorical Exclusion Determination F Area Hazardous Waste Management Facility Silver Chloride Solution Injection Wells CX(s) Applied: B6.2 Date: 06/15/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

85

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 2, 2009 September 2, 2009 CX-000521: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cut and Cap #325 Steam Supply Header, 261-H Consolidated Incineration Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 09/02/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office September 2, 2009 CX-000520: Categorical Exclusion Determination 690-N (Ford Building) Fire System Isolation and Sanitary Sewer Grouting CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 09/02/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office September 1, 2009 CX-000519: Categorical Exclusion Determination E-Area Box Remediation Project CX(s) Applied: B6.6 Date: 09/01/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

86

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 9, 2010 August 9, 2010 CX-003633: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install Platform and Stairs at F-10 Outfall CX(s) Applied: B2.3 Date: 08/09/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 4, 2010 CX-003635: Categorical Exclusion Determination D-Area Chemical Truck Unloading Station CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 08/04/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 4, 2010 CX-003636: Categorical Exclusion Determination 484-D Sump Discharge Line Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/04/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 30, 2010 CX-003640: Categorical Exclusion Determination Howard T. Ricketts Laboratory (HTRL) Lab 134 CX(s) Applied: B3.6

87

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 20, 2011 April 20, 2011 CX-005766: Categorical Exclusion Determination Filter Testing with Static Test Cell CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/20/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office April 19, 2011 CX-005769: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dismantle and Removal (D&R) and Enhance Chemical Cleaning (ECC) on Waste Tank 8F (General) CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 04/19/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office April 15, 2011 CX-005771: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install Alternate Diesel Generator and Tie-In Connection for HB-Line CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 04/15/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

88

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 23, 2010 February 23, 2010 CX-001128: Categorical Exclusion Determination Closure of 607-10G Septic Tank (Served 661-G) CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 02/23/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office February 23, 2010 CX-001127: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ballistic Resistant Enclosure Hatch Counterbalance CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 02/23/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office February 23, 2010 CX-000878: Categorical Exclusion Determination 293-F Stack Risk Reduction Project CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 02/23/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office February 23, 2010

89

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 25, 2010 October 25, 2010 CX-004445: Categorical Exclusion Determination Waste Treatment Plant Secondary Waste Radioactive Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming (Module A) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/25/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office October 15, 2010 CX-004450: Categorical Exclusion Determination Plutonium Glass Sectioning CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/15/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office October 15, 2010 CX-004449: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bench Scale Testing to Provide Data on Precipitation Control in the Cesium Nitric Acid Recovery Process CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/15/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office October 15, 2010

90

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 10, 2010 December 10, 2010 CX-004837: Categorical Exclusion Determination Measurement of Compressive Strength CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/10/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 7, 2010 CX-004826: Categorical Exclusion Determination Piezometer Well Installation for 1,4-Dioxane Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 12/07/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 7, 2010 CX-004824: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dismantle and Remove Tank 6 Riser 7 for Waste Determination (WD) Sampling CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/07/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 7, 2010 CX-004823: Categorical Exclusion Determination Consolidation of K- and L-Area Heavy Water in C-Area

91

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 24, 2011 January 24, 2011 CX-005090: Categorical Exclusion Determination Stairway to FM-1H CX(s) Applied: B2.3 Date: 01/24/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office January 21, 2011 CX-005109: Categorical Exclusion Determination Y589, Mobile Digital Radiography Identification System - Station CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 01/21/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office January 20, 2011 CX-005108: Categorical Exclusion Determination Thin Films for Whisker Growth CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/20/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office January 19, 2011 CX-005107: Categorical Exclusion Determination Karl Fisher Titration CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/19/2011

92

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 11, 2009 December 11, 2009 CX-000815: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hydrogen Technology Laboratory 140 - Chromatography, Wet Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/11/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office December 8, 2009 CX-000819: Categorical Exclusion Determination Thin-Film Development Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/08/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office December 8, 2009 CX-000820: Categorical Exclusion Determination Vacuum Induction Melting of Metals CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/08/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office December 8, 2009 CX-000818: Categorical Exclusion Determination

93

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 10, 2010 March 10, 2010 CX-001373: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Development Tritium Support Laboratory for Mass Spectroscopy, Infrared Spectroscopy, and Raman CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/10/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office March 10, 2010 CX-001372: Categorical Exclusion Determination On-Dock Rail Straddle Portal Prototype Project, Y580 CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/10/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office March 4, 2010 CX-001129: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cut and Cap Firewater Line Tap-Off Near 714-7N CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/04/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

94

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 20, 2011 July 20, 2011 CX-006620: Categorical Exclusion Determination Relocate Hydroburst System from 238-H to 234-7H CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 07/20/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 18, 2011 CX-006619: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install Seventeen Monitoring Wells Around 715-D CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 07/18/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 18, 2011 CX-006618: Categorical Exclusion Determination Disable F-Tank Farm (FTF) Air Compressor Sequencer CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/18/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 18, 2011 CX-006617: Categorical Exclusion Determination E Area Fire Water Extension CX(s) Applied: B1.15

95

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 16, 2010 April 16, 2010 CX-002207: Categorical Exclusion Determination Thin Films for Whisker Growth CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/16/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office April 16, 2010 CX-002206: Categorical Exclusion Determination Real-Waste Testing of Enhanced Chemical Cleaning for Sludge Heel Removal CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/16/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office April 16, 2010 CX-002208: Categorical Exclusion Determination Monitor Instruments Mass Spectrometer at Aiken County Technology Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/16/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

96

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 20, 2010 July 20, 2010 CX-003668: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subsurface Soils Exploration for Potential Pit Disassembly and Conversion Project Sandfilter Footprint CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 07/20/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 7, 2010 CX-003670: Categorical Exclusion Determination Improvements to L Area Sidewalks CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/07/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 7, 2010 CX-002984: Categorical Exclusion Determination Improvements to L Area Sidewalks CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/07/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 25, 2010 CX-003671: Categorical Exclusion Determination

97

Geoff Tyree, DOE Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

JOBS: HANFORD SITE HANFORD FUNDS (as of April 26, 2010) Allocated Spent to Date DOE Richland Operations Office 1,634,500,000 414,111,226 DOE Office of River Protection...

98

Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation | National Nuclear  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation | National Nuclear Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation

99

Office of Counterterrorism Policy and Cooperation | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Counterterrorism Policy and Cooperation | National Nuclear Counterterrorism Policy and Cooperation | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Counterterrorism Policy and Cooperation Home > About Us > Our Programs > Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation > Office of Counterterrorism Policy and Cooperation

100

The Office of Nuclear Energy Announces Central Europe Nuclear Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

The Office of Nuclear Energy Announces Central Europe Nuclear The Office of Nuclear Energy Announces Central Europe Nuclear Safety Workshop in Prague The Office of Nuclear Energy Announces Central Europe Nuclear Safety Workshop in Prague October 3, 2011 - 2:04pm Addthis The Office of Nuclear Energy, in partnership with Czech Republic Ministry of Industry and Trade, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the State Agency for Nuclear Safety of the Czech Republic, and Argonne National Laboratory, is conducting a regional Nuclear Safety Workshop on Trends in Nuclear Power Plant Safety for Robust Civil Nuclear Programs on Oct. 10-13, 2011 in Prague. U.S. Ambassador Norman Eisen and Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Dr. Pete Lyons will deliver speeches welcoming participants. Representatives from the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Lithuania,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Thomas Miller Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Miller Miller Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology U.S. Department of Energy September 30, 2002 Presentation at the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee Nuclear Power 2010 Program Strategy to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants Nuclear Power 2010 Program Strategy to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology TMiller/Sept11_02 ESE Project.ppt ( 2) Nuclear Power 2010: Overview Nuclear Power 2010: Overview Goal 6 Achieve industry decision by 2005 to deploy at least one new advanced nuclear power plant by 2010 Cooperative Activities 6 Regulatory Demonstration Projects * Early Site Permit (ESP) * Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) 6 Reactor Technology Development Projects * NRC Design Certification (DC) * First-of-a-kind engineering for a standardized plant

102

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - August...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - August 2011 August 2011 Hanford Sludge Treatment Project HIAR-RL-2011-08-25 This Independent Activity Report...

103

Office of Nuclear Energy | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Office of Nuclear Energy Small Modular Reactors Small Modular Reactors The Small Modular Reactor program advances the licensing and commercialization of this next-generation...

104

Office of Nuclear Safety | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

and Security Officer regarding concurrence in the final decision to startup or restart a nuclear facility. Serves as the Standards Executive for the Department of Energy and...

105

Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs: Nuclear Facility Training  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety (HS-30) Safety (HS-30) Office of Nuclear Safety Home » Directives » Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy Rules » Nuclear Safety Workshops Technical Standards Program » Search » Approved Standards » Recently Approved » RevCom for TSP » Monthly Status Reports » Archive » Feedback DOE Nuclear Safety Research & Development Program Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design (HS-31) Office of Nuclear Safety Basis & Facility Design - About Us » Nuclear Policy Technical Positions/Interpretations » Risk Assessment Working Group » Criticality Safety » DOE O 420.1C Facility Safety » Beyond Design Basis Events Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs (HS-32) Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs - About Us » Facility Representative Program

106

Office of Secure Transportation History | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

History | National Nuclear Security History | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Office of Secure Transportation History Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Office of Secure Transportation > Office of Secure Transportation History Office of Secure Transportation History Since 1947, NNSA and its predecessor agencies have moved nuclear weapons,

107

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 15, 2013 March 15, 2013 CX-010126: Categorical Exclusion Determination Operation of Induction Furnace Fabrication Lab CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/15/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office March 15, 2013 CX-010125: Categorical Exclusion Determination Microfluidics for Advanced Separation and Ultrasensitive Detection CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/15/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office March 15, 2013 CX-010131: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replacement of the 254-13H Safety Significant (SS) Standby Diesel Generator CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 03/15/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office March 15, 2013 CX-010130: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mechanical Isolation of Plant Air System at TNX

108

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2012 9, 2012 CX-008639: Categorical Exclusion Determination Establish Laydown Yard East of 281-3F CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 05/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 29, 2012 CX-008638: Categorical Exclusion Determination Excavate to Repair Underground Domestic Water Leak between Tanks 5 and 7 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 29, 2012 CX-008637: Categorical Exclusion Determination Operation and Maintenance of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry Method in 773, B142 CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 29, 2012 CX-008636: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analysis of Organic Species by Gas Chromatography (GC) and Gas

109

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 21, 2013 May 21, 2013 CX-010489: Categorical Exclusion Determination Salt Batch 7 Qualification CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/21/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 14, 2013 CX-010497: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electrical Operations to Perform Yard Maintenance in Electrical Substations CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 14, 2013 CX-010496: Categorical Exclusion Determination Corrosion Tests on Carbon Steel Exposed to Oxalic Acid and a Sludge Simulant CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 14, 2013 CX-010495: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI) Am/Cm Separations

110

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

April 2013 Operational Awareness of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)...

111

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 29, 2012 November 29, 2012 CX-009607: Categorical Exclusion Determination 772-F Low-Activity Drain (LAD) Discharge Header Modification CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 29, 2012 CX-008651: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dismantle and Remove (D&R) and Replace 773-A D-Wing Air Handling and Condensing Units CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/17/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 29, 2012 CX-009608: Categorical Exclusion Determination Refurbish 607-53C Sanitary Sewer Lift Station CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 27, 2012 CX-009611: Categorical Exclusion Determination

112

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 31, 2013 July 31, 2013 CX-010844: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subcontractor Repair of Leak Over Entry Door #1 at 703-B CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/31/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 30, 2013 CX-010846: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install Stud, Shims, and Nut in the L-Basin 70-Ton Cask Lid Support Structure CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 07/30/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 23, 2013 CX-010850: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install Well Pump into the F-Tank Farm Catch Tank FL-241901-WTS-TK-1 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/23/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 23, 2013 CX-010849: Categorical Exclusion Determination

113

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 13, 2013 August 13, 2013 CX-011158: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subcontractor Repair of Roof Leaks at 717-11A CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/13/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 13, 2013 CX-011157: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subcontractor Roof Repairs in Telecom Room at 702-C CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/13/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 8, 2013 CX-011163: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subcontractor Repair of Roof Leaks at 730-4B CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/08/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 8, 2013 CX-011162: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subcontractor Repair of Roof Leaks at 730-1B CX(s) Applied: B1.3

114

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 16, 2013 April 16, 2013 CX-010322: Categorical Exclusion Determination Research and Development Welding and Brazing Sample Preparation and Activities in Building 723-A CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/16/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office April 16, 2013 CX-010321: Categorical Exclusion Determination Destructive Evaluation of Plutonium Storage Can Bundles CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/16/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office April 16, 2013 CX-010320: Categorical Exclusion Determination Corrosion Testing in Aqueous Solutions CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/16/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office April 15, 2013 CX-010324: Categorical Exclusion Determination 772-F Chase 174 Sprinkler Modification

115

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 24, 2012 July 24, 2012 CX-009067: Categorical Exclusion Determination Deactivation and Decommissioning of the D-Area Detritiation Cells and Relocation of Associated Handi-Houses CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 24, 2012 CX-009066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of Downgradient Volatile Organic Compounds Plume and Installation of Monitoring Well CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 24, 2012 CX-009065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of Sentinel Wells ASB011B/011C for A-2 Air Stripper Shutdown CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

116

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 20, 2012 July 20, 2012 CX-009070: Categorical Exclusion Determination A-Area Alternate Fire Water Supply CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 20, 2012 CX-009069: Categorical Exclusion Determination Remove and Dispose of 107 A & B Tanks and Support Structure CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 07/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 20, 2012 CX-009068: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hydrogen Charging Tritium Contaminated Metals CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 16, 2012 CX-009077: Categorical Exclusion Determination F-Area Infrasturcture Improvement CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/16/2012

117

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 30, 2012 August 30, 2012 CX-009100: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cooling Tower Water Sampling and Analysis for Legionella Pneumophila Density CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/30/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 29, 2012 CX-009106: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dismantle/Remove Vacuum System and Related Equipment in 772-F CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 29, 2012 CX-009105: Categorical Exclusion Determination 284-H Track Coal Hopper Pit Modifications CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 08/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 29, 2012 CX-009104: Categorical Exclusion Determination Infrastructure Modification for the Mobile Plutonium Facility (MPF) at the

118

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 20, 2013 June 20, 2013 CX-010655: Categorical Exclusion Determination Roof Repair on Crane Maintenance Area Roof CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/20/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 18, 2013 CX-010657: Categorical Exclusion Determination Western Sector Treatment System Soil Vapor Extraction Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/18/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 18, 2013 CX-010656: Categorical Exclusion Determination Stormwater Drainage Repair CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/18/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 17, 2013 CX-010662: Categorical Exclusion Determination Reroute Diesel Water Cooling Line at 241-125H CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/17/2013

119

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 27, 2012 June 27, 2012 CX-008614: Categorical Exclusion Determination Repair Culvert on Road 3 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/27/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 27, 2012 CX-008613: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Awning, Building 735-A CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/27/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 26, 2012 CX-008618: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evaluation of Sorbent/Ion Exchangers for Radiochemical and Metal Separations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/26/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 26, 2012 CX-008617: Categorical Exclusion Determination Savannah River National Laboratory Building 735-13A Power Addition CX(s) Applied: B1.15

120

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 17, 2012 January 17, 2012 CX-007642: Categorical Exclusion Determination Parking Lot Construction North of Pad 717-14F CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 01/17/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office January 4, 2012 CX-007646: Categorical Exclusion Determination Insulation removal work in F-Tank Farm CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/04/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office January 4, 2012 CX-007645: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nonproliferation Technology Section - Nanomaterials Research CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/04/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 29, 2011 CX-007650: Categorical Exclusion Determination Control Room Consolidation CX(s) Applied: B2.2

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 1, 2012 November 1, 2012 CX-009620: Categorical Exclusion Determination Next Generation Solvent (NGS) Real Waste Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/01/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office October 31, 2012 CX-009624: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Activity Waste Trailer (HAWT) Disposition CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 10/31/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office October 31, 2012 CX-009623: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technetium Precipitation Batch Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/31/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office October 25, 2012 CX-009625: Categorical Exclusion Determination Preparation and Temperature-Time Settling Treatment of Rheology Samples

122

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 7, 2012 February 7, 2012 CX-007967: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electrochemical Fluorination in Molten Fluoride Salts CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office February 7, 2012 CX-007966: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sampling of Legacy Material for Material, Control & Accountability (MC&A) Verification CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office February 7, 2012 CX-007965: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grout Formulation & Variability Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office February 6, 2012 CX-007971: Categorical Exclusion Determination

123

Office of Civil Rights | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Civil Rights | National Nuclear Security Administration Civil Rights | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Office of Civil Rights Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights Office of Civil Rights OCR's mission: Promote and advocate Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action (EEO/AA) for all NNSA employees.

124

DOE Office of Nuclear Energy Transportation Planning, Route Selection...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE Office of Nuclear Energy Transportation Planning, Route Selection, and Rail Issues DOE Office of Nuclear Energy Transportation Planning, Route Selection, and Rail Issues...

125

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 17, 2009 December 17, 2009 CX-000810: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ceramic Synthesis and Gas Permeation Measurements in 735-11A CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/17/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office December 17, 2009 CX-000809: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cut, Remove and Replace Off-Gas Exhaust Fan #2 and #3 foundation and Replace Air Monitor Fan #1 and #2 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/17/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office December 17, 2009 CX-000808: Categorical Exclusion Determination Howard T. Ricketts Regional Biocontainment Laboratory 134 CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/17/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina

126

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 16, 2011 May 16, 2011 CX-006405: Categorical Exclusion Determination 707-C Storm Drain Repairs CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/16/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office May 13, 2011 CX-006406: Categorical Exclusion Determination Silver Chloride Injection at the F Area Hazardous Waste Management Facilities Barrier Wall CX(s) Applied: B6.9 Date: 05/13/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office May 12, 2011 CX-006407: Categorical Exclusion Determination Removal of Inactive Chromate Water Isolation Valves CRW-V-170 and CRW-V-175 and Installation of 3 Inch Blind Flanges for F-area New Hill CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/12/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina

127

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 3, 2011 October 3, 2011 CX-006944: Categorical Exclusion Determination Remove Insulation from High Point Flush Pump Drain Valve CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 10/03/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 29, 2011 CX-006946: Categorical Exclusion Determination Operation of Accredited Industrial Hygiene (IH) Laboratory in Building 772-F, Revision 1 CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/29/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 28, 2011 CX-006955: Categorical Exclusion Determination Repair Radiological Fixative Coatings in F Tank Farm CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/28/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Sandia Site Office

128

Office of Nuclear Energy | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Small Modular Reactors The Small Modular Reactor program advances the licensing and commercialization of this next-generation technology in the United States. Read more Middle School STEM Curriculum The Harnessed Atom curriculum offers essential principles and fundamental concepts on energy and nuclear science. Read more Educating Future Nuclear Engineers The Nuclear Energy University Program offers fellowships and scholarships for graduate and undergraduate students. Read more Managing Used Fuel and Waste REPORT: Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste Read more Consortium for Advanced Simulations of LWRs The Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) is

129

Office of Security Operations: Headquarters Security Officers (HSO) Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Headquarters Security Officers (HSO) Program Headquarters Security Officers (HSO) Program Responsible Individual/Contact: Wayne Berkebile - (301) 903-1163 - D-320 Scope: The Headquarters Security Officer (HSO) Program was established in 1990 by the Under Secretary of Energy in order to improve communications between the Office of Headquarters Security Operations and component organizations within DOE Headquarters. It is governed by DOE Headquarters Order 472.1, Headquarters Security Officer Program, dated 3-19-2010. Each Headquarters element is required to appoint at least one HSO and an Alternate HSO. HSOs perform a wide variety of security-related functions within their element such as obtaining security badges and clearances, maintaining Security Areas, acquiring security equipment, implementing procedures for protecting classified and sensitive information, conducting security inquiries, and arranging for required security services.

130

Contractor Fee Payments- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

See the amount of fees earned on EM's major contracts for each evaluated fee period and the total contract to date at the Richland Operations Office on these charts.

131

Office of Employee Development Operational Efficiency Project  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Office of Employee Development Operational Efficiency Project Survey Summary from Supervisory Staff the University titled "Operational Efficiency Project." Its mandate was to gather information, evaluate current operations, review benchmarks and best practices, and develop organizational and/or cost saving alternatives

Huang, Jianyu

132

Idaho Operations Office | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Idaho Operations Idaho Operations Office Idaho Operations Office Idaho Operations Office INL combines the expertise of government, industry and academia in a single laboratory under the leadership of Battelle Energy Alliance (BEA), a team comprised of Battelle Memorial Institute, Washington Group International, BWXT Services, Inc., the Electric Power Research Institute and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. BEA manages the laboratory under a Management and Operating contract. This contract requires: Safe and efficient operation of all INL facilities. Cost reduction by better use of existing facilities and elimination of under-utilized or unneeded facilities. More cost effective accomplishment of mission objectives by use of upgraded and new infrastructure. The ongoing effort needed to maintain federal facilities and infrastructure

133

Emergency Operations Training Academy | National Nuclear Security...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Emergency Operations Training Academy Emergency Operations Training Academy Emergency Operations Training Academy The Office of Emergency Operations, NA-40-The Emergency Operations...

134

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 April 2013 Operational Awareness of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance [HIAR-RL-2013-04-08] The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an onsite operational awareness review of a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) fire protection surveillance. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - February 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 201

135

Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Overview...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Environmental Management Overview Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Overview Oak Ridge Operations Office of Environmental Management Overview More...

136

CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A...

137

Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland...

138

Office of Safety Training Operations - Mission and Functions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety Training Operations Safety Training Operations The Office of Safety Training Operations supports the mission of the National Training Center (NTC) by providing competency-based safety training for professionals within the Department necessary to maintain the technical qualifications and professional skill base. Safety Training Operations offers training in the competencies outlined in the Technical Qualification Program Functional Area Qualification Standards. Please click on this link to go to the National Training Center. Mission The mission of the Office of Safety Training Operations is to develop and deliver safety training courses to ensure the technical proficiency necessary to maintain a qualified workforce within the Department of Energy (DOE)/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Safety Training Operations assists in maintaining the proficiency of the DOE/NNSA safety personnel through standardized safety training, education, and professional development services at the National Training Center.

139

Operations | National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

| National Nuclear Security Administration | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Operations Home > About Us > Our Programs > Emergency Response > Responding to Emergencies > Operations Operations NNSA's Emergency Response Operations program acts as the headquarters command and control, functioning as the coordinating focal point for all

140

Operations | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

| National Nuclear Security Administration | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Operations Home > About Us > Our Programs > Emergency Response > Responding to Emergencies > Operations Operations NNSA's Emergency Response Operations program acts as the headquarters command and control, functioning as the coordinating focal point for all

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 22, 2012 May 22, 2012 CX-008744: Categorical Exclusion Determination Implementation of a Low-Level Gamma-Ray Counting Facility - University of Texas at Austin CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/22/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office May 22, 2012 CX-008738: Categorical Exclusion Determination Determination of Microstructure and Chemical State Changes in Ion-Irradiated Fuels and Structural Components with a High Kinetic Energy Electron Detector - Illinois Institute of Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/22/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office May 22, 2012 CX-008737: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building Calorimetric and Thermogravimetric Analytical Instrumentation Capability at Oregon State University CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/22/2012

142

Office of Nuclear Energy | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Small Modular Reactors The Small Modular Reactor program advances the licensing and commercialization of this next-generation technology in the United States. Read more Middle School STEM Curriculum The Harnessed Atom curriculum offers essential principles and fundamental concepts on energy and nuclear science. Read more Educating Future Nuclear Engineers The Nuclear Energy University Program offers fellowships and scholarships for graduate and undergraduate students. Read more Managing Used Fuel and Waste REPORT: Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste Read more Consortium for Advanced Simulations of LWRs The Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) is the first DOE Hub for the modeling and simulation (M&S) of commercial

143

Chief Operating Officer Joe Bengfort  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Virtualization Engineer Jason Braatz Virtualization Engineer Dong Tran Sr. Intel/Citrix Systems Engineer Mark/Citrix Systems Engineer Hossain Bayat Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Christopher Hester Desktop Systems Engineer Karen O'Neill Director ­ IT Operations Mark Uchi Field Services Manager Michael Fernandez FS Technical

Yamamoto, Keith

144

Chief Operating Officer Joe Bengfort  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Engineer Jason Braatz Virtualization Engineer Dong Tran Sr. Intel/Citrix Systems Engineer Mark Sorbi Sr/Citrix Systems Engineer Hossain Bayat Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Christopher Hester Desktop Systems Engineer'Neill Director ­ IT Operations Mark Uchi Field Services Manager Michael Fernandez FS Technical Lead Vacant FS

Derisi, Joseph

145

Office of Headquarters Personnel Security Operations  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Headquarters Personnel Headquarters Personnel Director's Perspective Welcome to the Office of Headquarters Personnel Security Operations Stephanie Scott Grimes, Director The Office of Headquarters Personnel Security Operations serves the Department by providing a comprehensive Personnel Security Program for the DOE Headquarters complex. Our goal is to ensure that DOE classified information and materials are safeguarded from compromise by assuring that only trustworthy individuals are granted security clearances. This is accomplished through conscientious, just, and thoughtful application of Federal rules and statutes aimed at ensuring only individuals whose character, associations, and loyalty do not endanger the common defense are granted access to DOE classified information and materials.

146

Ir L (I.~ DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS OFFICE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ir Ir L (I.~ DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS OFFICE I.: ~ CONTRACT NO. DE-AC04-83AL18796 1. Vicinity Property i: Completion Report i , . Remedial Actions , cContractor 4,. -~'~ ~for the Uranium Mill Tailings ~~~z ~ Remedial Actions Project - MK-FEROUSON COMPANY *C~Ad PEE *CMIWN>tfIOW VICINITY PROPERTY COMPLETION REPORT AT CA-401 MAYERS STREET BRIDGEVILLE, PA 15017 JUNE 30, 1987 FOR URANIUM MILL TAILINGS REMEDIAL ACTION PROJECT OFFICE ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS OFFICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ALBUQUERQUE, NM BY MK-FERGUSON CC IPANY AND CHEM-NUCLEAR SYSTEMS, INC. MK-Ferguson Company has been granted authorization to perform remedial action under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978, Public Law 95-604. Remedial action was done in accordance to the EPA Standards for

147

First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue November 14, 2013 - 4:48pm Addthis First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue Assistant Secretary Lyons Assistant Secretary Lyons Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy On October 30th, I hosted Tribal Leaders from all over the United States at the first Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) and Tribal Leader Dialogue (Dialogue) in New Orleans, Louisiana. The Dialogue was a great success! The Tribal Leaders and I were able sit down together to discuss the issues surrounding nuclear energy in the

148

First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue November 14, 2013 - 4:48pm Addthis First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue First Office of Nuclear Energy -Tribal Leader Dialogue Assistant Secretary Lyons Assistant Secretary Lyons Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy On October 30th, I hosted Tribal Leaders from all over the United States at the first Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) and Tribal Leader Dialogue (Dialogue) in New Orleans, Louisiana. The Dialogue was a great success! The Tribal Leaders and I were able sit down together to discuss the issues surrounding nuclear energy in the

149

Office Director, Department of Energy, Sophia, Bulgaria | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Director, Department of Energy, Sophia, Bulgaria | National Nuclear Director, Department of Energy, Sophia, Bulgaria | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Riaz Awan Office Director, Department of Energy, Sophia, Bulgaria Riaz Awan Riaz Awan Role: Office Director, Department of Energy, Sophia, Bulgaria

150

Facility Operations Office, Brookhaven National Laboratory, BNL  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Facility Operations Office Facility Operations Office Safely supporting the missions of the laboratory... The Facility Operations Office addresses key issues in work planning, maintenance engineering, service-delivery models, and annual facility-work plans. Facility Operations Center: The Facility Operations Center provides computer programs designed to assist in the planning, management and administrative procedures required for an effective maintenance and asset management process. As an information technology tool for managing the maintenance process, a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) is a mission-essential part of any organization, and a tool for success. Infrastructure Management: IM's goal is to ensure Brookhaven National Laboratory real property assets are planned for, managed, tracked, and upgraded as required in order to meet BNL's current and future programmatic needs. To accomplish this IM performs site and utilities master planning, manages BNL's new project request and prioritization system (3PBP), maintains utilities maps, manages BNL's space and facilities data base, and provides program management for BNL's GPP, Line Item and Operating Funded Project programs.

151

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Ronald T. Bartholomew Ronald T. Bartholomew Director - Office of Safeguards, Security and Emergency Services U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office Ronald T....

152

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 2011 June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration [HIAR-RL-2011-06-22] The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an operational awareness review of the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011

153

Office of Security Operations: Mission and Functions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Mission and Functions Mission and Functions Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process. Functions

154

Office of Nuclear Energy Launches New Website | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Nuclear Energy Launches New Website Office of Nuclear Energy Launches New Website Office of Nuclear Energy Launches New Website February 11, 2013 - 4:01pm Addthis The Office of Nuclear Energy's mission is to advance nuclear power as a resource that can meet the United State's energy, environmental and national security needs. The Office of Nuclear Energy's mission is to advance nuclear power as a resource that can meet the United State's energy, environmental and national security needs. Assistant Secretary Lyons Assistant Secretary Lyons Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy What does this mean for me? Visit the new Office of Nuclear Energy website at energy.gov/ne. The Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) is pleased to introduce our new, updated public website: energy.gov/ne. The new site was designed to help facilitate users' access to NE

155

Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Office Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne,, Illinois 60439 James L. Liver-man, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment, HQ THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY On December 8, 1977, Edward J. Jascewsky, Department of Energy (DOE), and Walter Smith, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), visited The Dow Chemical Company, Walnut'Creek, California. The purpose of the visit was to discuss the past operations at these facilities under Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), Contract AT (40-l)-GEN 236, which involved process studies on different uranium ores. Discussions were held with Dr. Charles Levine, Radiation Safety Officer. He identified four rooms (j/l, 2, 18, and 25) in the Research Building that were used during the period of the contract. A survey of the facility was performed by Messrs. Jascewsky and Smith.

156

Office of the US Nuclear Waste Negotiator  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Office of the US Nuclear Waste Negotiator was created as an independent federal agency by the US Congress pursuant to the 1987 amendments to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. The office, which was authorized by Congress for 5 years following the enactment of the 1987 amendments, is headquartered in Boise, Idaho, and maintains a liaison office in Washington DC. The negotiator is charged with the responsibility of attempting to find a state or Indian tribe willing to host a repository or monitored retrievable storage (MRS) facility at a technically qualified site on reasonable terms. The negotiator is instructed to negotiate with any state or Indian tribe that expresses an interest in hosting a repository or MRS facility. The negotiator will formally submit the negotiated agreement and environmental assessment to Congress, and the agreement will become effective when acted on by Congress and signed by the President into law.

Leroy, D.H.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Civilian Nuclear Programs  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Civilian Nuclear Programs (GC-72) provides legal advice and support to the Department on issues involving nuclear materials, including:

158

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

DOEEIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic...

159

Office of Advanced Nuclear Research Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Integrate applicable work conducted in programs in the Offices of Nuclear Energy (Gen IV, NERI, I · FY 2010: Complete the design of a commercial-scale nuclear hydrogen production system · FY 2015 to budget uncertainties (risk/benefit) · Guide the development of technology to support decisions Develop

160

Program Overview Shane Johnson Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Overview Program Overview Shane Johnson Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology April 15, 2002 Presentation to the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Johnson/April15_02 NP 2010 to NERAC.ppt 2 Nuclear Power 2010 Overview Nuclear Power 2010 Overview Goals 6 Orders for one or more new nuclear plants by 2005 6 Operation of new nuclear power plants by 2010 6 New program initiative unveiled February 2002 6 Based on Near-Term Deployment Roadmap 6 Public/private partnership to: ! Develop advanced reactor technologies ! Explore sites that could host new nuclear power plants ! Demonstrate new Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulatory processes Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Johnson/April15_02 NP 2010 to NERAC.ppt 3

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Lempke receives Sandia Emergency Operations Center tour | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

receives Sandia Emergency Operations Center tour | National Nuclear receives Sandia Emergency Operations Center tour | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Lempke receives Sandia Emergency Operations Center tour Lempke receives Sandia Emergency Operations Center tour Posted By Office of Public Affairs NNSA Blog Brian Bielecki, Director & Facility Security Officer for Security &

162

Nuclear Safety Reserch and Development Program Operating Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety Research and Development Safety Research and Development Program Operating Plan Office of Nuclear Safety Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy June 2012 INTENTIONALLY BLANK NSR&D Program Operating Plan June 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 NSR&D PROGRAM PROCESSES .................................................................................... 3

163

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 2011 June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration [HIAR-RL-2011-06-22] The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an operational awareness review of the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Review, Hanford K Basin and Cold Vacuum Drying Facility - August 2012 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - February 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June

164

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Sludge Treatment Project Review [HIAR-RL-2011-06-17] The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Sludge Treatment Project - February 2012 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - August 2011

165

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Contracts Contractor Performance DOE Seal U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office P. O. Box A Aiken, SC 29802 (803) 952-7697 Site Operator: (803)...

166

Operational Analysis of Multiregional Nuclear Reactor Kinetics  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Operational Analysis of Multiregional Nuclear Reactor Kinetics NASSAR H. S. HAIDAR...analytically for a multiregional nuclear reactor whose subregions are of arbitrary...Operational Analysis of Multiregional Nuclear Reactor Kinetics NASSAU H. S. HAIDAR......

NASSAR H. S. HAIDAR

1983-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

Office of Nuclear Physics Jehanne Simon-Gillo  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Office of Nuclear Physics Jehanne Simon-Gillo Acquisition Executive (Acting) Office of Nuclear Physics Jehanne Simon-Gillo Program Manager BNL Site Office Nand Narain Federal Project Director NASA A. McNerney Physics Support D. Raparia E. Beebe A. Kponou M. Okamura A. Pikin #12;

168

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office - November Richland Operations Office - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

169

Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

y,: y; , i y,: y; , i 4- 1 .' f?Qj /J < b !. i-. .* ;+ ,.- Department of Energy Chicago Operations Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 : / *- I (jr-. _ __-rCILC-. .-WI __ James L. Liverman, Acting Assistant Secretary for Environment, HQ UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA On January 17, 1978, Edward J. Jascewsky, Department of Energy (DOE), and Walter H. Smith, Argonne National Laboratory (AX), visited the University of Arizona. The purpose of the visit teas to discuss the past operations of c$rtain facilities that were previcusly used by the Bureau of Mines for the Atomic Energy Coxission xork. Enclosed are three drawings showing the location of these facilities. The Bureau of Mines activities have been closed down for abour fifteen years, and the property of concern is now owned by the L'niversiry of

170

Safety of Nuclear Explosive Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This directive establishes responsibilities and requirements to ensure the safety of routine and planned nuclear explosive operations and associated activities and facilities. Cancels DOE O 452.2A and DOE G 452.2A-1A. Canceled by DOE O 452.2C.

2001-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

171

National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

93-851 8 93-851 8 JAM 1 4 2010 Scott Blake Harris, General Counsel, DOEiHQ (GC-1) FORS NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA SITE OFFICE (NNSA/NSO) NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY Pursuant to DOE Order 451. IB, NEPA Compliance Program, NNSA/NSO is pleased to provide the enclosed Annual NEPA Planning Summary. The document provides a brief description of ongoing and planned NEPA actions for calendar year 201 0. If there are any questions regarding this summary, please contact our NEPA Compliance Officer, Linda M. Cohn, at (702) 295-0077. s r4/(&~1/:~d Stephen A. Mellington Enclosure: As stated cc wtencl. via e-mail: C. M. Borgstrom, DOEiHQ (GC-54) FORS B. A. Costner, DOEiHQ (GC-54) FORS M. E. Martin, NNSAIHQ (NA-56) FORS

172

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Contacts Contacts Savannah River Operations Office U. S. Department of Energy P. O. Box A Aiken, SC 29802 Office of External Affairs - (803) 952-7697 DOE Seal U. S. Department of...

173

CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of River Protection K Basin Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System May 2004 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Conduct of Operations program at the Office of River Protection, K Basin Sludge Waste System. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System More Documents & Publications CRAD, Occupational Safety & Health - Office of River Protection K Basin

174

Office of Headquarters Personnel Security Operations: Mission and Functions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Executive Protection Office of Executive Protection Home Sub Offices › HQ Security Officers (HSO) Program › Office of Security OperationsOffice of Information Security › Office of Headquarters Personnel › Office of Physical Protection › Office of Security Operations Mission & Functions › Security Operations › HQ Security Operations › HQ Personnel Security Op. › Special Operations HSO Program - 2010 Spotlights - 2009 Spotlights - Spotlights Archives (2008-2007) HSO Contacts Contact Us Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan Security Reference Book HSS Logo Office of Headquarters Personnel Security Operations Reports to the Office of Security Operations Mission and Functions Mission Provide a comprehensive Personnel Security Program for the DOE Headquarters complex. Ensure that DOE classified information, materials, buildings and information systems are safeguarded from compromise by only granting security clearances and building access to trustworthy individuals. This is accomplished through conscientious, just, and thoughtful application of Federal rules and statutes with the goal of ensuring that only individuals whose character, associations, and loyalty do not endanger the common defense are granted access to DOE classified information, materials, buildings and information systems.

175

Nuclear Operations | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure...

176

National Nuclear Security Administration LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Security Administration LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE National Nuclear Security Administration CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN For LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY CONTRACT NO. DE-AC52-06NA25396...

177

Los Alamos Site Office Nuclear Maintenance Management Program...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Los Alamos Site Office Nuclear Maintenance Management Program Oversight Self-Assessment Dates of Activity : 1114...

178

APM hosts contracting officers in Albuquerque | National Nuclear...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

APM hosts contracting officers in Albuquerque | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing...

179

UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION CHICAGO OPERATIONS OFFICE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

$$ ,_, . $$ ,_, . UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION CHICAGO OPERATIONS OFFICE TELEPHONE 9600 SOUTH CASS AVENUE (312) 739-7711 ARCONNE. ILLINOIS 60439 ^,/" _. i ' > ;.:a c. JAN 17 1975 Martin B. Biles, Director Division of Operational Safety, HQ _ DISPOSAL OF SCRAP COPPER, CYCLOTRON DISMANTLING PROJECT, NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTER, CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY (CMU) Enclosed for your information is a copy of the October 28, 1974, letter from T. Morris (CMD) to J. Krupa (CH) with pages 1-4 and 8-16 of its attachment (the October 23, 1974, F. Bomba to T. Morris, memo- randum; pages 5-7 are economically omitted as they were not relevant to the subject of this letter) regarding disposal of 4 to 6 tons of copper. The enclosure contains a summary of data obtained from

180

Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) & Wastren Advantage, Inc. (WAI)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ridge Operations Office (ORO) & Wastren Advantage, Inc. (WAI) Ridge Operations Office (ORO) & Wastren Advantage, Inc. (WAI) Partnering Agreement For The Transuranic Waste Processing Program Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) & Wastren Advantage, Inc. (WAI) Partnering Agreement For The Transuranic Waste Processing Program The Transuranic (TRU) Waste Partnering Team will be viewed as a virtual High-Performing Organization that is widely recognized for exceeding expectations through innovative technical and management strategies, and whose commitment to its employees, the EM Mission, and the stewardship of the Oak Ridge Site are its highest priorities. Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) & Wastren Advantage, Inc. (WAI) Partnering Agreement For The Transuranic Waste Processing Program More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

PIA - Savannah River Operations Office Executive Commitment Action...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

River Operations Office Executive Commitment Action Tracking System More Documents & Publications PIA - GovTrip (DOE data) PIA - Bonneville Power Adminstration Ethics Helpline...

182

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Idaho Operations Office (ID)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Idaho Operations Office (ID) (See Environmental Management).

183

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Chicago Operations Office (CH)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Chicago Operations Office (CH) (See Science APS).

184

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office (SRS)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Savannah River Operations Office (SRS) (See also Environmental Management).

185

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Savannah River Operations Office...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Savannah River Operations Office (SRS) Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12...

186

Nuclear reactor characteristics and operational history  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1. Capacity and Generation, Table 3. Characteristics and Operational History 1. Capacity and Generation, Table 3. Characteristics and Operational History Table 2. U.S. Nuclear Reactor Ownership Data PDF XLS Plant/Reactor Name Generator ID Utility Name - Operator Owner Name % Owned Arkansas Nuclear One 1 Entergy Arkansas Inc Entergy Arkansas Inc 100 Arkansas Nuclear One 2 Entergy Arkansas Inc Entergy Arkansas Inc 100 Beaver Valley 1 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation Corp 100 Beaver Valley 2 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation Corp 100 Braidwood Generation Station 1 Exelon Nuclear Exelon Nuclear 100 Braidwood Generation Station 2 Exelon Nuclear Exelon Nuclear 100 Browns Ferry 1 Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 100

187

Independent Activity Report, Hanford Operations Office - July 2010 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Activity Report, Hanford Operations Office - July 2010 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Operations Office - July 2010 Independent Activity Report, Hanford Operations Office - July 2010 July 2010 Joint Assessment of the Effectiveness of Corrective Actions for the Building 336 Accident The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), and the Richland Operations Office (RL) performed a joint effectiveness assessment of the corrective actions taken by Washington Closure Hanford, LLC (WCH) in response to the Building 336 Fall Event. The review was conducted from July 12-21, 2010, by a team consisting of four HSS and six RL personnel. The scope of the assessment included evaluation of work control, fall protection, quality assurance, and conduct of operations.

188

R. Shane Johnson, Associate Director Office of Advanced Nuclear Research  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Advanced Nuclear Research Advanced Nuclear Research September 30, 2002 Generation IV International Forum Generation IV International Forum Presentation to the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Generation IV International Forum Generation IV International Forum 6 Government-sanctioned organization working together to plan the future of nuclear energy * Chartered in July 2002 * Conduct joint R&D on next-generation nuclear energy systems * Voluntary member participation in specific projects 6 Observer Organizations * OECD-NEA * IAEA * Euratom South Korea U.S.A. Argentina Brazil Canada France Japan South Africa United Kingdom Switzerland Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology

189

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - January 2011 January 2011 Presentation of Questions Associated With the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (Onsite) Multi-Canister Overpack Cask [ARPT-RL-2011-001] The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, during a site visit from January 10-14, 2011, presented the results of a technical review of the Safety Analysis Report (SAR) for Packaging (Onsite) Multi-Canister Overpack (MCO) Cask HNF-SD-SARP-017, Rev. 3, to DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) representatives. The presentation was supported by a detailed document that discussed the individual questions.

190

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DCARTER at 3:47 pm, Jan 11, 2008 DCARTER at 3:47 pm, Jan 11, 2008 c Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office P. 0. Box 30030 Amarillo, TX 791 20 MhdWswQAtwbWM JAN 3 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR: Dennis Huddleston, EP&O, B&W Pantex LLC FROM: & Site Engineering Programs SUBJECT: Interagency Agreement (LQG) for the Pantex Superfund Site (Pantex or Pantex Site) Please reference the attached Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) letter dated December 1 1,2007, subject as above. Subject letter was informally transmitted to B&W Pantex's Regulatory Compliance Department on December 19,2007, to expedite any subsequent requirements by the Pantex Site. The enclosed IAG identifies specific review and response times for each of the participating agencies

191

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PDF 4th Quarter FY 2013 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE Seal U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office P. O. Box A Aiken, SC 29802 (803) 952-7697 Site Operator: (803)...

192

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

- September 30, 2011 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE Seal U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office P. O. Box A Aiken, SC 29802 (803) 952-7697 Site Operator: (803)...

193

Infrastructure and Operations | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Operations | National Nuclear Security Administration Operations | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Infrastructure and Operations Home > About Us > Our Operations > Infrastructure and Operations Infrastructure and Operations NNSA's missions require a secure production and laboratory infrastructure meeting immediate and long term needs. The Associate Administrator for

194

Welcome to the Kansas City Field Office | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

(816) 488-3341 Manager, Office of Business & Security Operations (816) 488-5321 Contracting Officer (816) 488-3249 Team Lead, Security & Information Systems (816) 488-5109...

195

Los Alamos Site Office Nuclear Maintenance Management Program Oversight Self-Assessment, April 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11-18 11-18 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Los Alamos Site Office Nuclear Maintenance Management Program Oversight Self-Assessment Dates of Activity : 11/14/2011 - 11/18/2011 Report Preparer: Tim Martin Activity Description/Purpose: This activity report documents the results of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) review of the Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) self-assessment of LASO's Nuclear Maintenance Management Program (NMMP) oversight program and activities. This self-assessment was led by the DOE LASO Facility Operations/Safety Engineering Team's (FO/SET) Nuclear Facility Maintenance Manager and was

196

Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 Site: HANFORD - Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Operational Awareness at the Office of River Protection Dates of Activity : 05/13-23/2013 Report Preparer: Robert. E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the Office of River Protection (ORP) to observe contractor efforts to develop a hazards analysis for the Low Activity Waste facility of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), tour the WTP construction site, observe ORP's quality assurance audit of the WTP contractor (Bechtel National, Inc.), tour the

197

Operational Awareness Visit at the Office of River Protection  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 HAIR-HANFORD-2013-05-13 Site: HANFORD - Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Operational Awareness at the Office of River Protection Dates of Activity : 05/13-23/2013 Report Preparer: Robert. E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the Office of River Protection (ORP) to observe contractor efforts to develop a hazards analysis for the Low Activity Waste facility of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), tour the WTP construction site, observe ORP's quality assurance audit of the WTP contractor (Bechtel National, Inc.), tour the

198

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- November - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), which is within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The onsite review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations from August 13 to 17, 2012. The objective of this assessment was to evaluate the extent to which the DOE-RL has developed and employed appropriate methods for oversight of contractor

199

Emergency Operations Training Academy | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Operations Training Academy | National Nuclear Security Operations Training Academy | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Emergency Operations Training Academy Home > About Us > Our Programs > Emergency Response > Training > Emergency Operations Training Academy Emergency Operations Training Academy Rotating image showing pictures of Classroom, Online and Hands on trainings

200

los alamos field office | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 14, 2011 September 14, 2011 CX-006968: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sampling Cooling Tower Water at Savannah River Site and Performing and Analysis for Legionella Pneumophila Density CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 09/14/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 14, 2011 CX-006987: Categorical Exclusion Determination Reconfigure and Standardize Piping to Floor Drain in Pump Pit 281-9H CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/14/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 14, 2011 CX-006970: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Wooden Poles Around K Area CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/14/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina

202

Panel judges science office operation okay  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A handful of members of a House subcommittee last week laid out the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy for diagnosis. After four hours of poking and jabbing by members and witnesses, OSTP was essentially pronounced good enough, considering. ...

WIL LEPKOWSKI

1988-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

203

Subcontracting Practices at the Nevada Operations Office and Its Management and Operating Contractor, WR-B-96-07  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SUBCONTRACTING PRACTICES AT THE NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE AND ITS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTOR

204

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Executive Summary  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Executive Summary Mission As we become more in this new century, the benefits of nuclear fission as a key energy source for both the near- and long method of generating energy from nuclear fission in both the United States and the world. A key mission

205

Office of Headquarters Security Operations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Headquarters Security Headquarters Security Operations Office of Headquarters Security Operations Mission The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive. The Office is the database owner for the principal personnel security information processing activities of the Department and personnel security administrative review process.

206

CRAD, Conduct of Operations- Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a May 2004 assessment of the Conduct of Operations program at the Office of River Protection, K Basin Sludge Waste System.

207

Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program Operating Plan...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Operating Plan Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program Operating Plan July 5, 2012 Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program Operating Plan This operating...

208

Operational Awareness Rerview of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance, April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance Dates of Activity : 04/08/2013 - 04/11/2013 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an onsite operational awareness review of a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) fire protection surveillance. Result: During the period April 8-11, 2013, an HSS representative participated in DOE-RL tours of various site facilities to review

209

Operational Awareness Rerview of a Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance, April 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 HIAR-RL-2013-04-08 Site: DOE-Richland Operations Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Fire Protection Surveillance Dates of Activity : 04/08/2013 - 04/11/2013 Report Preparer: Jake Wechselberger Activity Description/Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed an onsite operational awareness review of a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) fire protection surveillance. Result: During the period April 8-11, 2013, an HSS representative participated in DOE-RL tours of various site facilities to review

210

emergency operations | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Congressional...

211

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 April 2011 Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project [HIAR-RL-2011-04-07] The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed operational awareness reviews of the Sludge Treatment Project (STP), Engineered Container Retrieval and Transfer System (ECRTS) during site visits. On November 17, 2010, a HSS representative participated in a tour of the STP test facility. The HSS representative was also briefed by the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) Project Engineer, the CHPRC STP Design Manager, and the DOE-RL principal support contract engineer. The HSS representative walked down the major components of the

212

IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE NAMES NEW IDAHO CLEANUP PROJECT MANAGER |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE NAMES NEW IDAHO CLEANUP PROJECT MANAGER IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE NAMES NEW IDAHO CLEANUP PROJECT MANAGER IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE NAMES NEW IDAHO CLEANUP PROJECT MANAGER June 29, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Brad Bugger (208) 526-0833 Idaho Falls, ID - The Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office today announced that James Cooper has been named deputy manager of its highly-successful Idaho Cleanup Project, which oversees the environmental cleanup and waste management mission at DOE's Idaho site. Cooper has more than 30 years of experience in commercial and government engineering and management, including an eight month stint as acting Deputy Manager for EM. He has extensive experience in business management associated with program planning, development and administration. His experience includes all project phases from conceptual planning, cost and

213

EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 EM's Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013 December 24, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. Workers separate a glove box for removal from Hanford’s Plutonium Finishing Plant. Workers separate a glove box for removal from Hanford's Plutonium Finishing Plant. Workers sample a well used to monitor groundwater at the Hanford site. Workers separate a glove box for removal from Hanford's Plutonium Finishing Plant. RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Richland Operations Office's 2013 accomplishments ranged from cleaning up buildings and waste sites to treating a record

214

Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress January 5, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Hardy, DOE (509) 376-5365 Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office contractors achieved a great deal of cleanup progress at the Hanford Site in 2010. Below are just some of the major accomplishments of our River Corridor, Central Plateau, and Mission Support contractors: River Corridor To date, approximately half of the cleanup in the Hanford Site's 220-square-mile River Corridor is complete. The River Corridor cleanup

215

Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) & Wastren Advantage, Inc. ...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

1 o FaCility Representative Fred Heacker Director, Waste Programs, TWPC April 2011 1 of 5 OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE (ORO) & WASTREN ADVANTAGE, INC. (WAI) WI PARTNERING AGREEMENT...

216

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of G4S-Government Solutions, is contracted by the U.S. Department of Energy's Savannah River Operations Office to provide security support services for the 310-square-mile...

217

OFFICE OF FACILITIES ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS Strategic and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Engineering Museum Support Services Bruce Kendall Director Sheryl Kolasinski DD/CoS Facilities Master Planning Management Engineering &Design Management Technical Services Fire Protection Occupational Safety OccupationalOFFICE OF FACILITIES ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS Strategic and Administrative Management Julie

Mathis, Wayne N.

218

DOE Office of Science Computing Facility Operational Assessment...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Physics Lab NUG Meeting, 17 Sep 2007 Objective * The DOE Office of Science is required to conduct an Operational Assessment (OA) Review of the efficiencies in the steady-state...

219

Ms. Victoria A. White Chief Operating Officer Fermilab  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Ms. Victoria A. White Chief Operating Officer Fermilab P.O. Box 500 Batavia, I L 60510 Dear Ms. White: SUBJECT : NATIONA L ENVIRON MENTAL POLICY ACT DETERMI NATION AT FERMI...

220

Ms. Victoria A, White Chief Operating Officer Fermilab  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A, White Chief Operating Officer Fermilab P.O. Box 50Q Batavia, I L 60510 Dear Ms. White: SUBJECT: NATIONAL ENVIRONMEN TAL POLICY ACT DTRMINATI QN AT ERMs NATIONAL ACCELERATO R...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

T. Zack Smith T. Zack Smith Deputy Manager U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office T. Zack Smith Mr. Smith is the Deputy Manager for the U. S. Department of...

222

State of Nevada, Agency for Nuclear Projects/Nuclear Waste Project Office narrative report, January 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Agency for Nuclear Projects/Nuclear Waste Project Office (NWPO) is the State of Nevada agency designated by State law to monitor and oversee US Department of Energy (DOE) activities relative to the possible siting, construction, operation and closure of a high-level nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain and to carry out the State of Nevada`s responsibilities under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. During the reporting period the NWPO continued to work toward the five objectives designed to implement the Agency`s oversight responsibilities: (1) Assure that the health and safety of Nevada`s citizens are adequately protected with regard to any federal high-level radioactive waste program within the State; (2) Take the responsibilities and perform the duties of the State of Nevada as described in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425) and the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987; (3) Advise the Governor, the State Commission on Nuclear Projects and the Nevada State Legislature on matters concerning the potential disposal of high-level radioactive waste in the State; (4) Work closely and consult with affected local governments and State agencies; (5) Monitor and evaluate federal planning and activities regarding high-level radioactive waste disposal. Plan and conduct independent State studies regarding the proposed repository.

NONE

1992-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

223

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

supervising Federal facility representatives, who are responsible for overseeing conduct of operations by the contractor for nuclear material processing and storage...

224

Office of Administrative Operations (GC-90)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

John D. (Dan) Bullington, Director of Administrative Operations 202-586-7364dan.bullington@hq.doe.gov

225

National Nuclear Secutffy Admlnlsbrrtlon NEVADA SITE OFFICE  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Secutffy Admlnlsbrrtlon Secutffy Admlnlsbrrtlon NEVADA SITE OFFICE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN for CONTRACT NO. DE-AC52-06NA25946 with NATIONAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Jose Stephen A. ~ e l l ; l ~ t o n , Manager Nevada Site Office Date Nevada Site Office Contract Management Plan December 17.2008 Table of Contents ................................................................. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 3 .................................................................................. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 ............................................................................................ 2.0 PURPOSE 5 .................................................................................... 2.1 Applicability 6 ...................................................................... 2.2 Updates and Distribution 6

226

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION I National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences: include title, general activities, location, timeframc) Kirtland Operations - Project 1769 - Relocate NC-135 Site Operations: transfer existing operations from the NC-135 site on Kirtland Air force Base (KAFB) to leased and other Federal property. No buildings designed for occupancy are being relocated. Transfer will consist of tenant improvements to the new leased properties and transfer through the relocation of existing equipment and office personnel. November 2012 thru April 2014. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D.) B 1.24 - Property Transfer B 1.31 - Installation or relocation of machinery and equipment

227

Removal of 1,082-Ton Reactor Among Richland Operations Offices 2014 Accomplishments  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. Workers with EMs Richland Operations Office and its contractors made progress this year in several areas of Hanford site cleanup that helped protect employees, the public, environment, and Columbia River.

228

Nuclear reactor characteristics and operational history  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Nuclear > U.S. reactor operation status tables Nuclear > U.S. reactor operation status tables Nuclear Reactor Operational Status Tables Release date: November 22, 2011 Next release date: November 2012 See also: Table 1. Capacity and Generation, Table 2. Ownership Data Table 3. Nuclear Reactor Characteristics and Operational History PDF XLS Plant Name Generator ID Type Reactor Supplier and Model Construction Start Grid Connection Original Expiration Date License Renewal Application License Renewal Issued Extended Expiration Arkansas Nuclear One 1 PWR Babcock&Wilcox, Lower Loop 10/1/1968 8/17/1974 5/20/2014 2/1/2000 6/20/2001 5/20/2034 Arkansas Nuclear One 2 PWR Combustion Eng. 7/1/1971 12/26/1978 7/17/2018 10/15/2003 6/30/2005 7/17/2038

229

Nuclear reactor characteristics and operational history  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nuclear > U.S. reactor operation status tables Nuclear > U.S. reactor operation status tables Nuclear Reactor Operational Status Tables Release date: November 22, 2011 Next release date: November 2012 See also: Table 2. Ownership Data, Table 3. Characteristics and Operational History Table 1. Nuclear Reactor, State, Type, Net Capacity, Generation, and Capacity Factor PDF XLS Plant/Reactor Name Generator ID State Type 2009 Summer Capacity Net MW(e)1 2010 Annual Generation Net MWh2 Capacity Factor Percent3 Arkansas Nuclear One 1 AR PWR 842 6,607,090 90 Arkansas Nuclear One 2 AR PWR 993 8,415,588 97 Beaver Valley 1 PA PWR 892 7,119,413 91 Beaver Valley 2 PA PWR 885 7,874,151 102 Braidwood Generation Station 1 IL PWR 1,178 9,196,689 89

230

Department of Energy - Idaho Operations Office FY-2013 and Beyond Strategic Plan  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

- Idaho Operations Office - Idaho Operations Office FY-2013 and Beyond Strategic Plan Introduction The Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) 2013 Strategic Plan and Beyond outlines the Federal workforce mission, vision, strategies, objectives, responsibilities, and expectations that will sustain the successful accomplishment of the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Site mission. DOE-ID's Strategic Plan is aligned with the DOE Headquarters Strategic Plan and DOE-ID's efforts toward becoming an internationally recognized world class laboratory. By implementing this Strategic Plan, DOE-ID is playing an important supporting role in achieving DOE's overall mission to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental, and nuclear challenges through transformative science and

231

Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

June 20-22, 2011, at the Cold Vacuum Drying Facility at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site. The activity consisted of observing an operational assessment of the facility's...

232

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

JAN 22 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR: J. Brian Bidwell, Prime Contract Manager, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC / / / FROM: Seb M. Klein, Contracting Officer, Pantex Site Offic ~ SUBJECT: Contract No. DE-AC04-00AL66620, Contract Modification No. M193 to B& W Pantex Contract Enclosed for your retention is an executed copy of the subject modification. This modification revises Part II, Section I - Contract Clauses, Part III Section J, Appendix A - Definitions, Part I - Compensation System, Part II - Benefits Program, Part IV Miscellaneous Human Resources Programs, incorporates Reimbursement Authorizations Thirty (30) Thirty One (31 ) Thirty Two (32), previously approved by a Contracting Officer, replace Appendix E - "List of Applicable Directives," with as of

233

Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Policy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Policy Technical Position NSEP-TP-2007- 1, Technical Position on the Requirement in DOE 0 420.1B to Use National Consensus Industry Standards and the Model Building CodesTechnical Position NS Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Policy Technical Position NSEP-TP-2007- 1, Technical Position on the Requirement in DOE 0 420.1B to Use National Consensus Industry Standards and the Model Building CodesTechnical Position NS All new construction required to follow the provisions of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 420. lB, Facility Safety, must comply with national consensus industry standards and the model building codes applicable for the state or region in which the facility is located. Certain individuals in the fire community requested

234

Conduct Operations Assessment Plan - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Independent Oversight Division  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 2003 - Conduct of Operations (Programmatic Implementation) August 2003 - Conduct of Operations (Programmatic Implementation) Utilize Conduct of Operations - 5480.19 Utilize BN PD-0021.001 - Formality of Operations Utilize LLNL, LANL comparable documents (WSS) Requirements matrix at the senior management level Flow-down of requirements into facilities VALUE ADDED FOR: AMTS Contractor Assurance Focus Area AMTS ISM Improvements Focus Area AMTS Nuclear Operations Focus Area AMTS Performance Assurance Division AMNS Programs CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS Assessment Plan NNSA/Nevada Site Office Independent Oversight Division Performance Objective: The purpose of this assessment is to verify programmatic implementation of DOE O 5480.19, "Conduct of Operations Requirements of DOE Facilities" Criteria: Operations at DOE facilities shall be conducted in a manner to assure an

235

Office of Nuclear Warhead Protection | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure...

236

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pantex Site Office Pantex Site Office P. 0. Box 30036 Amarillo, TX 79120 JAN 1 2 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR: KENNETH W. POWERS ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR STEVEN C. ERHART MANAGER FROM: SUBJECT: Submission of Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summaries for Fiscal Year 20 1 1 Please reference your memorandum dated December 17,2010, subject as above. Attached are the Pantex Site Ofice (PXSO) Annual NEPA Planning Summaries. All PXSO NEPA documentation expected in the near future or already under development is listed in these forms. This information is being disseminated through the Pantex Website at www.pantex.com and will be made available to the public in area Department of Energy Information Repositories. The PXSO does not anticipate preparing any Environmental Assessments within the next 12 months or

237

Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - EM Statement - November 24, 2009  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex High Hazard Nuclear Operations Statement of Dr. Ines Triay Assistant Secretary, DOE Office of Environmental Management November 24, 2009 Good morning Mr. Vice Chairman and Members of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. I appreciate the opportunity to be here today to represent the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) and address the actions our office has taken regarding oversight of complex high hazard nuclear operations. My remarks cover the six topics you provided to the Secretary in your letter dated August 25, 2009. Expectations of the senior Department of Energy (DOE) leadership with respect to safety philosophy and safety management approach.

238

Hazard Analysis Reports for Nuclear Explosive Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NA-STD-3016-2006 NA-STD-3016-2006 May 2006 DOE LIMITED STANDARD HAZARD ANALYSIS REPORTS FOR NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE OPERATIONS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program web site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE-NA-STD-3016-2006 iii FORWARD This Department of Energy (DOE)/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) technical standard is approved for use by the Assistant Deputy Administrator for Military Application and Stockpile Operations (NA-12), and is available for use to prepare Nuclear Explosive Operation (NEO) Hazard Analysis Reports (HARs) as required by 10 CFR 830, "Nuclear Safety Management." This Standard is

239

Redelegation Order No. 00-002.04-01 to the Chief Operating Officer...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy Delegate: Chief Operating Officer Office of Fossil Energy Status: Current Effective Date: May 02, 2011 Re-delegation Allowed: Yes...

240

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

and Corrective Action Requirements for Owners and Operators of Underground Storage Tanks (UST) 40 CFR 300 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan 40...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Digital computer operation of a nuclear reactor  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A method is described for the safe operation of a complex system such as a nuclear reactor using a digital computer. The computer is supplied with a data base containing a list of the safe state of the reactor and a list of operating instructions for achieving a safe state when the actual state of the reactor does not correspond to a listed safe state, the computer selects operating instructions to return the reactor to a safe state.

Colley, Robert W. (Richland, WA)

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Digital computer operation of a nuclear reactor  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A method is described for the safe operation of a complex system such as a nuclear reactor using a digital computer. The computer is supplied with a data base containing a list of the safe state of the reactor and a list of operating instructions for achieving a safe state when the actual state of the reactor does not correspond to a listed safe state, the computer selects operating instructions to return the reactor to a safe state.

Colley, R.W.

1982-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

243

Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office - FOIA Homepage  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Electronic Reading Room Documents Electronic Reading Room Documents Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) More on FOIA/Privacy Act Electronic Request Form Frequently Ask Questions Frequently Requested Documents Guides Helpful Links Points of Contact and Privacy Act Advisory Privacy Act Reading Room DOE-ID Public Reading Room Research Library You are here: DOE-ID Home > FOIA Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) allows you to obtain information from various agencies of the Federal government including the current Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) and its operating contractors, as well as predecessor organizations. The Privacy Act (PA) is a companion to the FOIA. The PA allows individuals to seek access to Federal agency

244

Nuclear Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Operating License & Design Certification Demonstration Projects Lessons Learned Report Nuclear Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating License & Design...

245

Independent Oversight Activity Report, National Nuclear Security Administration Production Office- March 10-14, 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Contractor Transition Activities for the National Nuclear Security Administration Production Office [IAR-NPO-2014-03-10

246

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

JAN 2 7 2012 JAN 2 7 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR: TIMOTHY G. LYNCH ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL FROM: STEVEN C. ERHART MANAGER SUBJECT: Submission of Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summaries for Fiscal Year 2012 Attached are the Pantex Site Office (PXSO) Annual NEPA Planning Summaries. All PXSO NEPA documentation expected in the near future or already under development is listed in these forms. This information is being disseminated through the Pantex Website at www.pantex.com and will be made available to the public in area Department of Energy Information Repositories. PXSO does not anticipate preparing any Environmental Assessments within the next 12 months or any Environmental Impact Statements within the next 24 months. We have begun preparing a new

247

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

M M m I Nudeor hriiy Adminisbnabn JAN - 7 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR: W. R. Mairson, Environment, Safety, & Health, B&W Pantex FROM: Johnnie F. Guelker, Assistant Manager for Environmental & Site Engineering Programs SUBJECT: Notice of Approval of an On-Site Sewage Facility Please reference the attached Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) letter dated December 16,2008, subject as above. Attached letter notifies the Pantex Site Office that the On-Site Sewage Facility (OSSF) has satisfied the design, construction, and installation requirements of the TCEQ and pursuant to Title 30, Texas Administrative Code (TAC). TCEQ has approved the OSSF constructed under TCEQ ID No.: 033- 0245 and the final inspection occurred on December 16,2008.

248

Improvements needed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Inspector and Auditor. Report to the Congress  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To help the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) carry out its responsibilities, a special office of Inspector and Auditor was created in April 1975 to independently review and appraise all NRC operations. This office, in essence, was to provide the Commissioners with oversight over NRC programs and activities and recommend corrective actions. GAO found that the Office of Inspector and Auditor has not been using proven management techniques in scheduling and carrying out its work. These techniques range from systematic planning and prioritization to timely and consistent followup on work. If such techniques were used, it would result in a more orderly management approach and lead to higher quality reports and a better use of staff resources. The independence of the Office of Inspector and Auditor needs to be strengthened. In GAO's view, this only may be possible if NRC accepts and implements the recommendations contained in this report. GAO also suggests that Congress consider establishing a statutory Inspector General office at the NRC. Such an office could help ensure that the Congress and the Commissioners receive objective information on problems within the Commission and enhance public trust in the regulation of commercial nuclear power.

Not Available

1981-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

249

Office of Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data 1989 annual report, Power reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) is devoted to the activities performed during 1989. The report is published in two separate parts. This document, NUREG-1272, Vol. 4, No. 1, covers power reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry from the NRC perspective, including comments about the trends of some key performance measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year and summarizes information from such sources as licensee event reports, diagnostic evaluations, and reports to the NRC's Operations Center. This report also compiles the status of staff actions resulting from previous Incident Investigation Team (IIT) reports. 16 figs., 9 tabs.

None

1990-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Nuclear Facility Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Nuclear Facility U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals, Self-Study Guide U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals, Self-Study Guide This is an open-book evaluation. Complete the questions, and submit your answers (hand-written or electronically) to the Training Center. Someone will check and grade your answers. If you achieve a score of at least 80%, you will receive a completion certificate. Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Fundamentals Self-Study Guide Review Questions More Documents & Publications Requirements in DOE O 5480.19, Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities Cross-referenced to DOE O 422.1, Conduct of Operations. U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office Nuclear Facility

251

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section March 28, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis An aerial view of Hanford’s 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. An aerial view of Hanford's 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. More than 8,000 feet of pipe — part of the 300 Area’s process sewer system — was removed from the 300-15 Waste Site in the north section. More than 8,000 feet of pipe - part of the 300 Area's process sewer

252

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford's 300 Area North Section March 28, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis An aerial view of Hanford’s 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. An aerial view of Hanford's 300 Area North Section following completion of cleanup. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. Workers demolish the 384 Building, known as the Power House and Heating Plant, in the north portion of the 300 Area. More than 8,000 feet of pipe — part of the 300 Area’s process sewer system — was removed from the 300-15 Waste Site in the north section. More than 8,000 feet of pipe - part of the 300 Area's process sewer

253

ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMlNlSTRATldN CHICAGO OPERATIONS OFFICE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMlNlSTRATldN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMlNlSTRATldN CHICAGO OPERATIONS OFFICE 9999 SOUTH CASS AVENUE - .~-- ARGONNE, ILL!&+ bt.499 _ In Reply Refer TO: SEP. 1 61975 Martin B. Biles, Director Division of Operational Safety, HQ CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY (CMU) CYCLOTRON DISMANTLING PROJECT The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the dismantling activities which have been performed or are planned at the CMU, Nuclear Research Center, Saxonburg, Pennsylvania, site for purposes of preparing the site for unrestricted release from a radiological standpoint. Facility Description and Background Attachment 1 shows a schematic of the main building (which housed the synchrocyclotron, laboratories, machine shop, and offices) and adjacent ancillary facilities. Not shown (direction of location shown by arrows)

254

United States Government Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2012 0, 2012 Subject: Fiscal Year 2012 National Environmental Policy Act Planning Summary (OS-ETSD-12-011) To: Timothy G. Lynch, Acting General Counsel DOE-HQ, GC-IIFORS In accordance with DOE Order 451.1 B, the Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) is submitting its Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summary. The FY 2012 NEPA Planning Summary will be made available to the public as required by the Order. Estimated NEPA document costs are provided for actions that are well enough defined from a planning and budget perspective. If you have any questions concerning the attachment or the DOE-ID NEPA compliance program, please contact me or our NEP A Compliance Officer, Jack Depperschmidt, at (208) 526-5053.

255

DHS/National Operations Center | National Nuclear Security Administrat...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations...

256

Improvements needed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Inspector and Auditor  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report discusses the improvements needed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office of Inspector and Auditor. Also, we raise the possibility of Congress establishing an Office of Inspector General at the Commission. Such an office will ensure that the Congress and the Commissioners receive objective information on problems within the Commission and enhance public trust in the regulation of commercial nuclear power.

Not Available

1981-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

257

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 19~ 2012 Subject: Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011 (OS-DM-12-004) To: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson Federal Technical Capability Panel National Nuclear Security Administration Reference: Memorandum, Karen Boardman to Distribution, "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011," dated October 13,2011 In accordance with direction in the reference, the Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) performed a workforce analysis and developed an Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Report. The Report is hereby submitted for the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) review and incorporation into the FTCP Annual Report to the Secretary.

258

Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes, November 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Review Oversight Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight of Implementation Verification Review Processes November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2

259

State of Nevada, Agency for Nuclear Projects/Nuclear Waste Project Office narrative report, October 1--December 31, 1991  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Agency for Nuclear Projects/Nuclear Waste Project Office (NWPO) is the State of Nevada agency designated by State law to monitor and oversee US Department of Energy (DOE) activities relative to the possible siting, construction, operation and closure of a high-level nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain and to carry out the State of Nevada`s responsibilities under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. During the reporting period the NWPO continued to work toward the five objectives designed to implement the Agency`s oversight responsibilities. (1) Assure that the health and safety of Nevada`s citizens are adequately protected with regard to any federal high-level radioactive waste program within the State. (2) Take the responsibilities and perform the duties of the State of Nevada as described in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425) and the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987. (3) Advise the Governor, the State Commission on Nuclear Projects and the Nevada State Legislature on matters concerning the potential disposal of high-level radioactive waste in the State. (4) Work closely and consult with affected local governments and State agencies. (5) Monitor and evaluate federal planning and activities regarding high-level radioactive waste disposal. Plan and conduct independent State studies regarding the proposed repository.

NONE

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

260

UNITED STATES ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CHICAGO OPERATIONS OFFICE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

CHICAGO OPERATIONS OFFICE 9800 SOUTH CASS AVENUE ARGONNE, ILLINOIS 80439 TELEPHONE (312) 739-7711 ADMINISTRATION JUL 11977 Hal Hollister, Acting Director Division of Operational and Environmental Safety, HQ RESURVEY PROGRAM - BRUSH BERYLLIUM COMPANY A visit to the Brush Beryllium Company (presently called Brush Wellman), Cleveland, Ohio was made by Edward J. Jascewsky and members of the Argonne National Laboratory survey team on May 17, 1977. The group met with Martin Powers and Nate Bass, Vice Presidents of Brush Wellman. The purpose of the visit was to determine if any radiological survey was needed as a result of past Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contract work. The work performed by Brush Beryllium involving radioactive materials was done at two locations in the Cleveland area. One site was located

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Operational Experience in Nuclear Power Stations [and Discussion  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Operational Experience in Nuclear Power Stations...self-sustaining nuclear reaction to the present...time large-scale generation of electrical power from nuclear energy has become...the C.E.G.B. reactors have been in service...

1974-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nuclear Development Corp of America -  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Nuclear Development Corp of America Nuclear Development Corp of America - NY 32 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT CORP. OF AMERICA (NY.32) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 5 New Street , White Plains , New York NY.32-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.32-2 Site Operations: Conducted experiments involving uranium recovery from scrap. NY.32-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - Facility was licensed to handle nuclear materials NY.32-2 NY.32-3 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium NY.32-2 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT CORP. OF AMERICA

263

CRAD, Nuclear Reactor Facility Operations - December 4, 2014...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Nuclear Reactor Facility Operations - December 4, 2014 (EA CRAD 31-08, Rev. 0) CRAD, Nuclear Reactor Facility Operations - December 4, 2014 (EA CRAD 31-08, Rev. 0) December 4, 2014...

264

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Richland Operations Office and CH2M Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 April 2012 Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to observe and shadow1 a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) assessment of its contractors at the Hanford Site. The HSS reviewer observed the implementation and effectiveness of the DOE-RL assessment of two of the contractors (CHPRC and

265

MAJOR BENJAMIN H. SMITH Major Benjamin H. Smith is the Operations Officer of the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

BENJAMIN H. SMITH Major Benjamin H. Smith is the Operations Officer of the Air Force Reserve Officer Smith is a native of Omaha, Nebraska and entered the Air Force in June 2003. He received his commission

266

Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data 1996 annual report. Volume 10, Number 1: Reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) describes activities conducted during 1996. The report is published in three parts. NUREG-1272, Vol. 10, No. 1, covers power reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry from the NRC perspective, including comments about trends of some key performance measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year and summarizes information from such sources as licensee event reports and reports to the NRC`s Operations Center. NUREG-1272, Vol. 10, No. 2, covers nuclear materials and presents a review of the events and concerns during 1996 associated with the use of licensed material in nonreactor applications, such as personnel overexposures and medical misadministrations. Both reports also contain a discussion of the Incident Investigation Team program and summarize both the Incident Investigation Team and Augmented Inspection Team reports. Each volume contains a list of the AEOD reports issued from CY 1980 through 1996. NUREG-1272, Vol. 10, No. 3, covers technical training and presents the activities of the Technical Training Center in support of the NRC`s mission in 1996.

NONE

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

Qualifying Officials Designation Letter - Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOEP IUUI DOEP IUUI United States Government Department of Energy (DOE) memorandum Savannah River Operations Office (SR) DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: NOV 3 o 2010 MGR (Moody, 2-9468) Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Qualifying Officials (QO) ro: DISTRIBUTION Each employee whose name appears on the attached listings is designated as a TQP QO. You were chosen by your supervisor because you have demonstrated an in-depth level of knowledge and abilities in the functional area or functional competency for which you are designated. As a designated TQP QO, you play a significant role in the qualification process of TQP participants and have a grave responsibility for maintaining the intent and integrity of the program. Your signature on the qualification record validates the

268

UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Iew York Operation8 Office  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

fi ' fi ' J/ui : ,I/ /J ii%/~it~ - ,,(,C, \,\J,iT/~l \ 11, ?' UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Iew York Operation8 Office Files (.Thrur V.L.Parsegian, Director, Division of Technical Advisers) Decenber 19, 1950 9; G.Strc&e, Division of Technical Advisers COLD-DRAWING OF TJRAXItZI RODS A BXIDGEPORT BRATS CO'Ei+A!R Symbol: TAtFGSrmam On 12/11/50, an exper%mnt was conducted at the Bridgmort Brass Company in whioh an attanpt m m made to cold-draw hot-foiled rods of uranium tich had been pickled to remove the oxi:!e coating. In addition, a few mpickled bars were drawn. It can be uoncluded from this erperimmt that we x-me unable tith the lubricants used to draw the pickled rods of uranium. This' appears to verify the necessity for an oxide film on the uranium to

269

Dr. Bruce L. Chrisman Chief Operating Officer Fermilab  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Bruce L. Chrisman Bruce L. Chrisman Chief Operating Officer Fermilab P.O. Box 500 Batavia, IL 60510 Dear Dr. Chrisman: SUBJECT: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) DETERMINATION AT FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY (FERMILAB) - FERMILAB MUON CAMPUS, INCLUDING THE MUON TO ELECTRON CONVERSION (Mute) EXPERIMENT AND THE MC-1 BUILDING Reference: Letter, from B. Chrisman to M. Weis, dated June 6, 2012, Subject: NEPA Environmental Evaluation Notification Form (EENF) for the Fermilab Muon Campus, including the Mute Experiment and the MC-1 Building have reviewed the Fermilab EENF for the Fermilab Muon Campus, including the Mute Experiment and the MC-1 Building. Based on the information provided in the EENF, I have approved the following categorical exclusion (CX): Project Name Approved CX

270

Dr, Bruce L. Chrisman Chief Operating Officer F~rmilab  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Dr, Bruce L. Chrisman Dr, Bruce L. Chrisman Chief Operating Officer F~rmilab P.O. Box 500 Batavia, IL 60510 Dear Dr. Chrisman: SUBJECT": NATIONAL ENVIRQNMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPI~) DETERMINATION .~T FERMI N,4TIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY (FERMILAB~ - 35 TOE( LIQUID ARGON PROTOTYPE DETECTOR Reference: Letter, from B. Chrisman to M. Weis, dated Aprif 11, 2012, Subject: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Evaluation Notification Forrri (EENF) for the 35 Ton Liquid Argon Prototype Detector have reviewed the Fermilab EENF for the 35 Ton Liquid Argon Prototype Detector. Based on the information provided in the EENF, I have approved the following categorical exclusion (CX): Project Name 35 Ton Liquid Argon Detector Approved CX 4/12/207 2 B3.6 am returning a signed copy of the EENF for your records. No further ~IEPA review is required.

271

Mr. Jack W. Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

~y ~y ,~ !l` ~; Mr. Jack W. Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab P.O. Box 500 Batavia, IL 60510 Dear Mr. Anderson: SUBJECT: NATIONAL ENVIRONM ENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) DETERMIN ATION AT FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERA TOR LABORATO RY (FERMILAB ) - NORTHERN ILLINOIS CENTER FOR ACCELERA TOR AND DETECTOR DEVELOPM ENT (NICADD) EXTRUSIO N LINE FACILITY Reference: Letter, from J. Anderson to M. Weis, dated February 13, 2013, Subject: NEPA Environment al Evaluation Notification Form (EENF) for the NICADD Extrusion Line Facility have reviewed the Fermilab EENF for the NICADD Extrusion Line Facility. Based on the information provided in the EENF, I have approved the following categorical exclusion (CX): Project Name A~groved CX NICADD Extrusion Line Facility 2/20/2013 B1.15 am returning a signed copy of the EENF for your records. No further NEPA review is required.

272

United States Government Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2011 1, 2011 Subject: 2011 National Environmental Policy Act Planning Summary (OS-ETSD-11-001) To: Scott Blake Harris, General Counsel DOE-HQ, GC-1IFORS In accordance with DOE Order 451.1 B, the Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) is submitting its 2011 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summary. The 2011 NEPA Planning Summary will be made available to the public as required by the Order. Estimated NEPA document costs are provided for actions that are well enough defined from a planning and budget perspective. If you have any questions concerning the attachment or the DOE-ID NEPA compliance program, please contact me or our NEPA Compli (208) 526-5053. ',Manager Attachment cc: C. M. Borgstrom, DOE-HQ, GC-54/FORS B. M. Angle, BBWI, MS-3428

273

Mr. Jack W. Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A~ ~ ~ 2013 A~ ~ ~ 2013 Mr. Jack W. Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab P.O. Box 500 Batavia, IL 60510 Dear Mr. Anderson: SUBJECT: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) DETERMINATION FOR' THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE LONG BASELINE NEUTRINO EXPERIMENT (LBNE) DETECTOR SITE IN SOUTH DAKOTA Reference: Letter, from J. Anderson to M. Weis, dated March 21, 2013, Subject: NEPA Environmental Evaluation Notification Form (EENF) for the Geotechnical Investigation of the LBNE Detector Site in South Dakota have reviewed the EENF for the Geotechnical Investigation of the LBNE Detector Site in South Dakota. Based on the information provided in the EENF, I have approved the following categorical exclusion (CX): Protect Name Approved CX Geotechnical Investigation of the LBNE 3/27/2013 B3.1

274

ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION SAN FRANCISCO OPERATIONS OFFICE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OR. I-s- - OR. I-s- - c" - ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION SAN FRANCISCO OPERATIONS OFFICE 1333 EIROAOWAY OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 64612 f&t/ 12, 19-X E. K. Loop, Chief Process Facilities Safety Branch, Division of Safety, Standards and Compliance P'&.DIOLOGICAL SITUATION AT ALBANY METALLURGICAL RESEARCH CENTER The following information is submitted in response to your subject request. The enclosed table provides the history of the AEC and ERDA spon- sored research activities conducted at Albany Metallurgical Re- search Center (AMRC). None of these activities has been covered by an AEC or NRC license. However, AMRC has filed application for an amendment to an existing NRC license in order to cover the ongoing ERDA sponsored radioactive work.

275

Mr. Jack W. Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Jack W. Anderson Jack W. Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab P.O. Box 500 Batavia, IL 60510 Dear Mr. Anderson: SUBJECT: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) DETERMINATION AT i FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY (FERMILAB) - HYDROSTATIC RELIEF ACTION AT THE NEUTRINOS AT THE MAIN INJECTOR (NUMI) Reference: Letter, from J. Anderson to M. Weis, dated January 16, 2013, Subject: NEPA Environmental Evaluation Notification Form (EENF) for the Hydrostatic Relief Action at NuMI have reviewed the Fermilab EENF for the Hydrostatic Relief Action at NuMI. Based on the information provided in the EENF, I have approved the following categorical exclusion (CX): Project Name Approved CX Hydrostatic Relief Action at NuMI 1/76/2013 B2.5 am returning a signed copy of the EENF for your records. No further NEPA review is required.

276

X013 Mr. Jack Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

JUI~ 0 ~ JUI~ 0 ~ X013 Mr. Jack Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab P.O. Box 500 Batavia, IL 60510 Dear Mr. Anderson: SUBJECT: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) DETERMINATION AT FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY (FERMILAB) - VARIOUS DEMOLITION JOBS 2013 Reference: Memorandum, from J. Anderson to M. Weis, dated May 28, 2013, Subject: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Evaluation Notification Form (EENF) for Various Demolitions 2013 have reviewed the Fermilab EENF for the Various Demolition Jobs in 2013 that include 37-39 Shabbona, 31-33 Blackhawk, the Village Water Tower, Trailer 159, and the Site 50 T&M Barn and Building A. Based on the information provided in the EENF, I have approved the following categorical exclusion (CX):

277

Mr. Jack W. Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

~' ~' Mr. Jack W. Anderson Chief Operating Officer Fermilab P.O. Box 500 Batavia, I L 60510 Dear Mr. Anderson: SUBJECT: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) DETERMINATION AT FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY (FERMILAB) - SITEWIDE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE (DWS) REPLACEMENT PROJECT Reference: Letter, J. Anderson to M. Weis, dated August 30, 2012, Subject: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Evaluation Notification Form (EENF) for the Sitewide Domestic Water Service Replacement Project have reviewed the Fermilab EENF for the Sitewide Domestic Water Service Replacement Project. Based on the information provided in the EENF, I have approved the following categorical exclusion (CX): Protect Name Approved CX Sitewide DWS 9/04/2012 B1.3, 81.15 Replacement Project

278

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Operating Principles  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Operating Principles Operating Principles Our wtis.sion is vitcrl ~ r i r l urgent - rue corrstnntly jOcus on missiort outconles. - US nuclear security is the fundamental mission of the NNSA and its laboratories, plants, and test site. - Mission managers bear responsibility for achieving mission outcomes. - Support managers provide technical assistance and support to enable mission delivery. - Our activities reflect a mission-focused, high performing. high reliability enterprise consistently delivering on its commitmerits and addressing national needs. - We constantly strive to drive innovation and reduce barriers to effectively and collaboratively accomplish our mission. Scierrce crnd fecltnology lie crt the hetrrt ?four mission. - The NNSA and its laboratories, plants, and test site are resources to organizations in the US Government

279

FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Operations Specialist | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Operations Specialist Nuclear Operations Specialist FAQS Qualification Card - Nuclear Operations Specialist A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-NuclearOperationsSpecialist.docx Description Nuclear Operations Specialist Qualification Card More Documents & Publications

280

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance- April 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

United States Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Environmental Compliance Handbook. Third edition  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Environment, Safety & Health Division (ESHD) of the Nevada Operations Office has prepared this Environmental Compliance Handbook for all users of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and other US Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) facilities. The Handbook gives an overview of the important environmental laws and regulations that apply to the activities conducted by the Nevada Operations Office and other users of DOE/NV facilities in Nevada.

NONE

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

2014 Annual Planning Summary for the NNSA Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the NNSA Savannah River Operations Office.

283

Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - HSS Statement draft, November 24, 2009  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

-20-09 -20-09 1 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations Statement of Mr. Glenn Podonsky Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer U. S. Department of Energy November 24, 2009 INTRODUCTION Mr. Vice Chairman and Members of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB or "Board"), I am pleased to have this opportunity to discuss the Department's actions in response to the Board's Recommendation 2004-1 and other significant recommendations, initiatives, and management actions affecting nuclear safety in the Department. As the Department's Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer, I am here to update you on what we are doing and where we stand on pertinent issues, including our commitment to programs and processes aimed at the safe

284

Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Civilian Nuclear...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

(HLW) and Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Management of Nuclear Materials and Non-HLW Nuclear Fuel Cycle Energy Research and Development Non-Proliferation Nuclear Regulatory Commission...

285

Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations - NNSA Statement - November 24, 2009  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Public Meeting on Oversight of Complex, High Hazard Nuclear Operations Statement of Garrett Harencak, BRIG GEN, USAF Principal Assistant Deputy Administrator for Military Application Office of Defense Programs November 24, 2009 Good Morning, Mr. Vice-Chairman. I appreciate the opportunity to speak to the Board this morning regarding the Defense Programs approach to ensuring the safe management and operation of the nuclear security enterprise. Defense Programs Safety Approach and Safety Philosophy Consistent with the rest of the Department of Energy, the foundation of Defense Program's safety philosophy is Integrated Safety Management (ISM). Defense Programs and its Management and Operating Contractors continue to mature their implementation of ISM.

286

Independent Oversight Review of the Employee Concerns Program at the Savannah River Operations Office, July 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of the of the Employee Concerns Program at the Savannah River Operations Office May 2011 February 2013 July 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose.................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope and Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 2

287

Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data 1990 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) is devoted to the activities performed during 1990. The report is published in two separate parts. This document NUREG-1272, Vol. 5, No. 1, covers power reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry from the NRC perspective, including comments about the trends of some key performance measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year and summarizes information from such sources as licensee event reports, diagnostic evaluations, and reports to the NRC's Operations Center. NUREG-1272, Vol.5, No. 2, covers nonreactors and presents a review of the events and concerns during 1990 associated with the use of licensed material in nonreactor applications, such as personnel overexposures and medical misadministrations. The reports contain a discussion of the Incident Investigation Team program and summarize the Incident Investigation Team and Augmented Inspection Team reports for that group of licensees. Each volume contains a list of the AEOD reports issued for 1980 through 1990. 9 figs., 8 tabs.

None

1991-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

QUOTIENTS, EXACTNESS AND NUCLEARITY IN THE OPERATOR SYSTEM CATEGORY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

QUOTIENTS, EXACTNESS AND NUCLEARITY IN THE OPERATOR SYSTEM CATEGORY ALI S. KAVRUK, VERN I. PAULSEN system category. We define operator system quotients and exactness in this setting and refine the notion of nuclearity by studying operator systems that preserve various pairs of tensor products. One of our main goals

289

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Infrastructure and Environmental Stewardship Ronald T. Bartholomew - Office of Safeguards, Security and Emergency Services Douglas E. Hintze - Assistant Manager for Mission...

290

Report on Follow-up Inspection of the Double Funding of Security for Special Nuclear Material at Richland Operations, IG-0378  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 INFORMATION: Report on "Follow-up Inspection of the Double Funding of Security for Special Nuclear Material at the Richland Operations Office" The Secretary BACKGROUND: On June 3, 1993, the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Inspections issued a Letter Report to the Department's Acting Chief Financial Officer which stated that during Fiscal Year 1993 the Department had requested and received $60 million, double the funding needed, for the safeguard and security of special nuclear material at the Richland Operations Office. In response to that Report, the Acting Chief Financial Officer took control of the funds and placed them into a management reserve account. A follow-up inspection was initiated to:

291

Nuclear safety information sharing agreement between NRC and DOEs Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Nuclear safety information sharing agreement between NRC and DOEs Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security.

292

Table 3. Nuclear Reactor Characteristics and Operational History  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3. Nuclear Reactor Characteristics and Operational History" "Plant Name","Generator ID","Type","Reactor Supplier and Model","Construction Start","Grid Connection","Commercial...

293

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) are committed to continuous improvement and will utilize principles of the DOE Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Partnering Policy to enhance teaming to further execute the Plateau Remediation Contract. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement

294

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2013 4, 2013 Subject: Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012 (EM-NSPD-13-003) To: Karen L. Boardman, Chairman Federal Technical Capability Panel National Nuclear Security Administration Reference: Memorandum, Karen Boardman to Distribution, "Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012," dated October 24, 2012 In accordance with direction in the reference, the Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) performed a workforce analysis and developed an Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Report. The Report is herby submitted for the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) review and incorporation into the FTCP Annual Report to the Secretary. Questions may be addressed to the DOE-ID FTCP Agent, Mark C. Brown at (208) 526-

295

Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data. Annual report, 1994-FY 95  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) has published reports of its activities since 1984. The first report covered January through June of 1984, and the second report covered July through December 1984. Since those first two semiannual reports, AEOD has published annual reports of its activities from 1985 through 1993. Beginning with the report for 1986, AEOD Annual Reports have been published as NUREG-1272. Beginning with the report for 1987, NUREG-1272 has been published in two parts, No. 1 covering power reactors and No. 2 covering nonreactors (changed to {open_quotes}nuclear materials{close_quotes} with the 1993 report). The 1993 AEOD Annual Report was NUREG-1272, Volume 8. AEOD has changed its annual report from a calendar year to a fiscal year report to be consistent with the NRC Annual Report and to conserve staff resources. NUREG-1272, Volume 9, No. 1 and No. 2, therefore, are combined calendar year 1994 (1994) and fiscal year 1995 (FY 95) reports which describe activities conducted between January 1, 1994, and September 30, 1995. Certain data which have historically been reported on a calendar year basis, however, are complete through calendar year 1995. Throughout this report, whenever information is presented for fiscal year 1995, it is designated as FY 95 data. Calendar year information is always designated by the four digits of the calendar year. This report, NUREG-1272, Volume 9, No. 1, covers power reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry from the NRC perspective. NUREG-1272, Vol. 9, No. 2, covers nuclear materials and presents a review of the events and concerns associated with the use of licensed material in non-power reactor applications. A new part has been added, NUREG-1272, Volume 9, No. 3, which covers technical training and presents the activities of the Technical Training Center in FY 95 in support of the NRC`s mission.

none,

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

Nuclear Physics User Facilities | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NP User Facilities NP User Facilities User Facilities ASCR User Facilities BES User Facilities BER User Facilities FES User Facilities HEP User Facilities NP User Facilities User Facilities Frequently Asked Questions User Facility Science Highlights Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 NP User Facilities Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Nuclear Physics program supports the operation of the following national scientific user facilities: Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC): External link RHIC at Brookhaven National Laboratory External link is a world-class scientific research facility that began operation in 2000, following 10 years of development and construction. Hundreds of physicists from around

297

Our Operations | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure...

298

Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program Operating Plan | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Operating Plan Program Operating Plan Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program Operating Plan July 5, 2012 Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program Operating Plan This operating plan outlines the mission, goals, and processes for the Department of Energy's (DOE) Nuclear Safety Research & Development (NSR&D) Program. This first version of the operating plan also discusses the startup phase of the program. NSR&D involves a systematic search for knowledge to advance the fundamental understanding of nuclear safety science and technology through scientific study, analysis, modeling, and experiments. Maintaining an effective NSR&D program will support DOE and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) in standards development, validation of analytical models and

299

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nuclear Metals Inc - MA 09  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Metals Inc - MA 09 Metals Inc - MA 09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NUCLEAR METALS, INC. (MA.09) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Licensed facility - included in NRC action plan (Site Decommissioning Management Plan) in 1990 for cleanup Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 1555 Massachusetts Ave. , Cambridge , Massachusetts MA.09-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 MA.09-1 Site Operations: Produced natural uranium tubes for Savannah River reactor program and fabricated power reactor fuel elements under AEC/NRC license. MA.09-4 MA.09-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority under FUSRAP - AEC licensed operation MA.09-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium, Thorium MA.09-1 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated

300

Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and CH2M and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance - April 2012 April 2012 Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations The purpose of this independent oversight review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to observe and shadow1 a DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) assessment of its contractors at the Hanford Site. The HSS reviewer observed the implementation and effectiveness of the DOE-RL assessment of two of the contractors (CHPRC and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Learn More About NNSA's Emergency Operations Office | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure...

302

Office of Test and Evaluation | National Nuclear Security Administrati...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Test and Evaluation | National Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response...

303

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

or after December 31, 2008, may obtain the date received by this office and the estimated completion date by clicking the FOIA listing Adobe Acrobat PDF . You will need to know...

304

Nuclear Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating License &  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating Nuclear Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating License & Design Certification Demonstration Projects Lessons Learned Report Nuclear Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating License & Design Certification Demonstration Projects Lessons Learned Report The Nuclear Power 2010 (NP 2010) Construction and Operating License/Design Certification (COL/DC) Demonstration program together with the financial incentives provided by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 are the two primary reasons why a number of license applications for new nuclear construction are before the NRC today, and why the first new nuclear plants in over 30 years are under construction in the United States. As with all significant endeavors, there are lessons to be learned from the

305

NNSA Field Office Manager Moves | National Nuclear Security Administra...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

has previously served as the Pantex Site Office Manager and the Pantex Site Office Senior Scientific and Technical Advisor. He has both the breadth of experience and the right...

306

Construction or Extended Operation of Nuclear Plant (Vermont) | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Construction or Extended Operation of Nuclear Plant (Vermont) Construction or Extended Operation of Nuclear Plant (Vermont) Construction or Extended Operation of Nuclear Plant (Vermont) < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Utility Program Info State Vermont Program Type Siting and Permitting Any petition for approval of construction of a nuclear energy generating plant within the state, or any petition for approval of the operation of a nuclear energy generating plant beyond the date established in a certificate of public good issued under this title, must be submitted to the public service board no later than four years before the date upon which the approval may take effect. Upon receipt of a petition for approval of construction or operation as provided under this section, the public service board shall notify the

307

Nuclear Facility Operations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

applied engineering national laboratory dedicated to meeting the nation's environmental, energy, nuclear technology, and national security needs. INL is a science-based, applied...

308

Analysis of Operation TEAPOT nuclear test BEE radiological and meteorological data  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the Weather Service Nuclear Support Office (WSNSO) analyses of the radiological and meteorological data collected for the BEE nuclear test of Operation TEAPOT. Inconsistencies in the radiological data and their resolution are discussed. The methods of normalizing the radiological data to a standard time and estimating fallout-arrival times are presented. The meteorological situations on event day and the following day are described. A comparison of the WSNSO fallout analysis with an analysis performed in the 1950's is presented. The radiological data used to derive the WSNSO fallout pattern are tabulated in an appendix.

Quinn, V.E.

1986-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

Analysis of operation TEAPOT nuclear test ZUCCHINI radiological and meterological data  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the Weather Service Nuclear Support Office (WSNSO) analyses of the radiological and meteorological data collected for the ZUCCHINI nuclear test of Operation TEAPOT. Inconsistencies in the radiological data and their resolution are discussed. The methods of normalizing the radiological data to a standard time and estimating fallout-arrival times are presented. The meteorological situations on event day and the following day are described. A comparison of the WSNSO fallout analysis with an analysis performed in the 1950's is presented. The radiological data used to derive the WSNSO 1986 fallout pattern are tabulated in an appendix.

Quinn, V.E.

1987-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), to include LANL's senior technical advisor to Rocky Flats for nuclear waste management and co-leader for the environmental restoration...

311

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Federal Technical Personnel January 2013 DOENE-ORSO CONCURRENCE AND APPROVAL CONCURRENCE: Marianne Heiskell, Lease and Technical Management Branch Chief Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office Randy DeVault, Regulatory Management Branch Chief, NE-ORSO Nucl~ffic ,___.~,. Larry Perkins, Deputy Manager, Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office APPROVAL: January 2013 2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report Date I /v/13 Date! 1/~3/13 Date ,;:L :/ /. * ~ Page ii DOENE-ORSO Table of Contents Section 1: Current Mission(s) of the Organization and Potential Changes Section 2: Technical Staffing Section 3: Current Shortages and Plans for Filling

312

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

One the cover: One the cover: Albert Einstein (1879-1955) U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Washington, D.C. 20585 The History of Nuclear Energy Table of Contents Preface ................................................................... 1 Introduction .......................................................... 3 The Discovery of Fission ...................................... 4 The First Self-Sustaining Chain Reaction ............ 5 The Development of Nuclear Energy for Peaceful Applications ..................................... 7 Chronology of Nuclear Research and Development, 1942-1994 .................................... 13 Selected References ............................................. 23 Glossary ..............................................................

313

EIS-0373: Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to the  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

373: Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to 373: Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to the Production of Radioisotope Power Systems EIS-0373: Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to the Production of Radioisotope Power Systems Summary NOTE: EIS-0373 has been cancelled. This EIS evaluates the environmental impacts of consolidating nuclear activities related to production of radioisotope power systems (RPS) for space and national security missions at a single DOE site: the preferred alternative is the Materials and Fuels Complex at Idaho National Laboratory. Public Comment Opportunities No public comment opportunities available at this time. Documents Available for Download January 9, 2013 EIS-0373: Notice of Cancellation of an Environmental Impact Statement Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to the Production of

314

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Piqua Nuclear Power Facility...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Piqua Nuclear Power Facility - OH 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Piqua Nuclear Power Facility (OH.08 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site...

315

Welcome to the Los Alamos Field Office | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

security, reliability and performance of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile without nuclear testing; works to reduce global danger from weapons of mass destruction; provides...

316

EA-1107: Construction and Operation of a Office Building at the Stanford  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7: Construction and Operation of a Office Building at the 7: Construction and Operation of a Office Building at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Berkeley, California EA-1107: Construction and Operation of a Office Building at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Berkeley, California SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposed project to modify existing Building 51B at the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to install and conduct experiments on a new Induction Linear Accelerator System. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 8, 1995 EA-1107: Finding of No Significant Impact Construction and Operation of a Office Building at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center September 8, 1995 EA-1107: Final Environmental Assessment

317

Alleged Ethical and Procurement Concerns at the Office of Nuclear Energy, INS-L-12-05  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Inspection Report Inspection Report Report RReReport Alleged Ethical and Procurement Concerns at the Office of Nuclear Energy INS-L-12-05 August 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 16, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT AND ASSISTANCE MANAGEMENT FROM: Sandra D. Bruce Assistant Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Alleged Ethical and Procurement Concerns at the Office of Nuclear Energy" BACKGROUND Approximately 80 percent of the Department of Energy's workforce is comprised of contractor

318

Report to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, 1986  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) is devoted to the activities performed during calendar year 1986. Comments and observations are provided on operating experience at nuclear power plants and other NRC licensees, including results from selected AEOD studies; summaries of abnormal occurrences involving US nuclear plants; reviews of licensee event reports and their quality, reactor scram experience from 1984 to 1986, engineered safety features actuations, and the trends and patterns analysis program; and assessments of nonreactor and medical misadministration events. In addition, the report provides the year-end status of all recommendations included in AEOD studies, and listings of all AEOD reports issued from 1980 through 1986.

none,

1987-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION I National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

I I National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences; include title, general activities, location, timeframe) Kansas City Plant -Routine Operating and Administrative Activities (ROAA) - NCR KCPIO·07: NEPA action levels for planned changes as defined in the FY2011 Health Safety & Environment Management System Description and Worker Safety & Health Program document, Section 7,0 Work Planning and Control, signed 9/212010. October 2010 thru September 201 1. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CPR 1021, Subpart D.) Multiple, which could include but not limited to: A7-A9, All, B1.3, B1.23, B1.3l as listed in Table 3.b of the document

320

National Nuclear Security Administration Kansas City Field Office  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

City Field Office 14520 Botts Road Kansas City, Missouri 64147 Kansas City Plant Related Web Pages Kansas City Plant Home Page - Provides background information and related news on...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hallam Nuclear Power Facility...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

was successfully conducted on April 29, 2009. The inspectio FACT SHEET Office of Legacy Management Location of the Hallam Decommissioned Reactor Hallam, Nebraska,...

322

Report on Inspection of the Performance Based Incentive Program at the Richland Operations Office, IG-0401  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

(8-89) EFG (07-90) United States Government Department of Energy MEMORANDUM DATE: March 10, 1997 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-1 SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Inspection of the Performance Based Incentive Program at the Richland Operations Office" TO: The Acting Secretary BACKGROUND: The subject final report is provided for your information. While conducting other inspection work at the Richland Operations Office (Richland), the Office of Inspector General identified the Fiscal Year 1995 Richland Performance Based Incentive (PBI) Program as an area of concern. Specifically, we were unable to identify any

323

Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1994 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report highlights the activities of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. The topics of the report include the president and chairmen`s joint message, overview of programs serving as the foundation for most of its activities, performance indicators for the US nuclear utility industry, and INPO`s 1994 financial reports and rosters. INPO has four technical cornerstone programs that serve as the foundation for most of its activities. (1) Evaluations of nuclear power plants operated by member utilities are conducted on a regularly scheduled basis. (2) INPO supports its member utilities in their work to achieve and maintain accreditation of training programs. (3) Events analysis programs identify and communicate lessons learned from plant events so utilities can take action to prevent similar events at their plants. (4) INPO helps members improve in nuclear operations areas through assistance programs and other activities that continually evolve to meet the changing needs of the nuclear industry

NONE

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

324

Offices | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Offices Offices Offices All Offices Program Offices Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy Loan Programs Office Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Office of Environmental Management Office of Fossil Energy Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs Office of Legacy Management Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Science Staff Offices Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs Office of Economic Impact and Diversity Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Hearings and Appeals Office of Inspector General Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Office of Management Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of Policy and International Affairs

325

operations center | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Our Operations Media Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Video Gallery Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home ...

326

Emergency Operations Training Academy | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Introduction Monitoring Division Mgr Training, Adv NARAC Dispersion Modeling NARAC Web Operations Overview of Consequence Management Overview of the DOENNSA Emergency...

327

Nuclear Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating License &  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating License & Design Certification Demonstration Projects Lessons Learned Report Nuclear Power 2010 Program: Combined Construction and Operating License & Design Certification Demonstration Projects Lessons Learned Report The Nuclear Power 2010 (NP 2010) Construction and Operating License/Design Certification (COL/DC) Demonstration program together with the financial incentives provided by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 are the two primary reasons why a number of license applications for new nuclear construction are before the NRC today, and why the first new nuclear plants in over 30 years are under construction in the United States. As with all significant endeavors, there are lessons to be learned from the

328

Report on Audit of the Department of Energy Program Offices' Use of Management and Operating Contractor Employees, IG-0392  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PROGRAM OFFICES' USE OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distrution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the

329

LMFBR operation in the nuclear cycle without fuel reprocessing  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Substantiation is given to expediency of investigation of nuclear power (NP) development with fast reactors cooled by lead-bismuth alloy operating during extended time in the open nuclear fuel cycle with slightly enriched or depleted uranium make-up. 9 refs., 1 fig., 6 tabs.

Toshinsky, S.I. [Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Kaluga (Russian Federation)

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

February 28, 2006, Department letter reporting completion of NNSA portion of Commitment 23 in the 2004-1 implementation plan, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations, which requires the development of site office action plans to improve the consistency and reliability of work planning and work control at the activity level, including the incorporation of Integrated Safety Management core functions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585 February 28, 2006 OFFICE O F THE ADMINISTRATOR The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Ch a i rm an Defensc Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004-2901 Dear Mr. Chairman: On Julie 10, 2005, Secretary Bodnian submitted the Department's Iiizplenzentution Plun to Itizpt-ove Oversight qf'Nucleur Operutions in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Recommendation 2004- I , Oversight qf Complex, High-Hrrzurd Nucleur Openrtiotzs. Section 5.3 of the Implementation Plan (IP) addresses Revitalizing Integruted SU/i-'ty Munagernent Implementution, and Subsection 5.3.2 addresses Work Plunning mil Work Control ut the Activity Level. Commitment 23 of the 1P requires development of site office action plans to improve the consistency and reliability of work

331

Operation TEAPOT, 1955 continental nuclear weapons test series. Technical report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the activities of an estimated 11,000 DOD personnel, both military and civilian, in Operation TEAPOT, the fifth atmospheric nuclear weapons testing series conducted in Nevada from 18 February to 15 May 1955. Activities engaging DOD personnel included Exercise Desert Rock VI observer programs, troop tests, and technical service programs; AEC scientific and diagnostic experiments to evaluate the effects of the nuclear device; DOD operational programs; and air support.

Ponton, J.; Maag, C.; Wilkinson, M.; Shepanek, R.F.

1981-11-23T23:59:59.000Z

332

October 2014 | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Harrington, NNSA Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation; and Morgan Smith, Chief Operating Officer, Consolidated Nuclear Security. The free course taught at...

333

Operations Program Management (OPM) Homepage | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Information Operations Program Management U.S. Department of Energy SC-33Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-8429 F: (301)...

334

Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Assessments | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

operation, deactivation, decontamination, decommissioning and environmental restoration. Conduct assessments of changes to operations, safety basis and modifications. Conducts...

335

Nuclear Power - Operation, Safety and Environment  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

as operation, safety, environment and radiation effects. The book is not offering a comprehensive coverage of the material in each area. Instead, selected themes are highlighted by authors of individual chapters representing contemporary interests worldwide...

336

Work for the DOE Office of Transportation Technologies - Nuclear  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of of Transportation Technologies Capabilities Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Overview Energy System Applications Overview DOE Office of Fossil Energy DOE Office of Transportation Technologies Ion-mobility Spectrometry Based NOx Sensor DOE Office of Power Technology Work for Others Safety-Related Applications Homeland Security Applications Biomedical Applications Millimiter Wave Group Papers Other NPNS Capabilities Work with Argonne Contact us For Employees Site Map Help Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter NE on Flickr Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Energy System Applications Bookmark and Share DOE Office of Transportation Technologies Ion-mobility Spectrometry Based NOx Sensor Real-time measurement of NOx content in the exhaust gas can provide the

337

US nuclear power plant operating cost and experience summaries  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

NUREG/CR-6577, U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Operating Cost and Experience Summaries, has been prepared to provide historical operating cost and experience information on U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. Cost incurred after initial construction are characterized as annual production costs, representing fuel and plant operating and maintenance expenses, and capital expenditures related to facility additions/modifications which are included in the plant capital asset base. As discussed in the report, annual data for these two cost categories were obtained from publicly available reports and must be accepted as having different degrees of accuracy and completeness. Treatment of inconclusive and incomplete data is discussed. As an aid to understanding the fluctuations in the cost histories, operating summaries for each nuclear unit are provided. The intent of these summaries is to identify important operating events; refueling, major maintenance, and other significant outages; operating milestones; and significant licensing or enforcement actions. Information used in the summaries is condensed from annual operating reports submitted by the licensees, plant histories contained in Nuclear Power Experience, trade press articles, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) web site (www.nrc.gov).

Kohn, W.E.; Reid, R.L.; White, V.S.

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations, April 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Review of Oversight Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations April 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

339

Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations, April 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of Independent Oversight Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations April 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

340

Field Operations Organization | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Field Operations Organization Field Operations Organization Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Organization Chart .pdf file (77KB) Field Offices Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) Safety, Security and Infrastructure (SSI) Oversight Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Field Operations Organization Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Field Operations is led by Deputy Director Joseph McBrearty and consists of three major elements - Site Offices, a Support Center, and Headquarters

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Audit of the Richland Operations Office Site Characterization Program, IG-0368  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 1995 0, 1995 IG-1 INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of the Richland Operations Office Site Characterization Program" The Secretary BACKGROUND: With its designation as an environmental cleanup site in 1989, the Hanford Site has represented a major activity of the Department of Energy (Department). The final cleanup of this site is estimated to take over 50 years and cost close to $100 billion. Although there are many factors influencing the operations at Hanford, the Department and the Richland Operations Office (Richland) are ultimately responsible for its success. The Department and Richland are responsible for establishing procedures that ensure program goals are accomplished using the most cost-effective methods. DISCUSSION:

342

Unesco Science Co-operation Office for Latin America  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... As an outcome of the Latin-American conference for the development of science, held in Montevideo in September 1948, the Unesco ... , held in Montevideo in September 1948, the Unesco Science Co-operation ...

1950-05-27T23:59:59.000Z

343

EA-1906: Operations, Consolidation, and Upgrades at the Office of Secure  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6: Operations, Consolidation, and Upgrades at the Office of 6: Operations, Consolidation, and Upgrades at the Office of Secure Transportation Western Command Site, Albuquerque, NM EA-1906: Operations, Consolidation, and Upgrades at the Office of Secure Transportation Western Command Site, Albuquerque, NM Summary This EA evaluates environmental impacts associated with the siting and construction of several proposed buildings, including a new vehicle maintenance facility and mobile equipment maintenance building (and their support structures) at the Western Command Site, Albuquerque, NM. Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download July 10, 2012 EA-1906: Finding of No Significant Impact Operations, Upgrades, and Consolidation at the Western Command Site, NM July 10, 2012 EA-1906: Final Environmental Assessment

344

Training program requirements for remote equipment operators in nuclear facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

One of the most neglected areas in the engineering development of remotely operated equipment applications in nuclear environments is the planning of adequate training programs for the equipment operators. Remote equipment accidents cannot be prevented solely by engineered safety features on the equipment. As a result of the experiences in using remote equipment in the recovery effort at Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2), guidelines for the development of remote equipment operator training programs have been generated. The result is that a successful education and training program can create an environment favorable to the safe and effective implementation of a remote equipment program in a nuclear facility.

Palau, G.L.; Auclair, K.D.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

Investing in the next generation: The Office of Nuclear Energy Issues Requests for Scholarship and Fellowship Applications.  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Today, the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) announced two new Requests for Applications (RFAs) for the Integrated University Program (IUP).

346

Welcome to the NNSA Production Office | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

management of the Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas, and the Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, Tenn. Pantex handles nuclear weapons surveillance and life extension programs;...

347

Nuclear Power - Deployment, Operation and Sustainability  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

t e su bmersion time. In addition, the high specific energy, or energy per unit weight of nuclear fuel, eliminat e s the need for consta n t refuel i n g by fleets of vulner a b l e tanke r s follo w i n g a fleet of surfa c e or subsur f a c e... onal Labora t o r y (INL) in 1989. The section of the hull containi n g the reactor rested in a ?sea tank? of water 40 feet deep and 50 feet in diameter. The purpose of the water was to help the shiel di n g designe r s stud y the ?backsca t t e r...

348

Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data 1996 annual report. Volume 10, Number 3: Technical training  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) describes activities conducted during 1996. The report is published in three parts. NUREG-1272, Vol. 10, No. 1, covers power reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry from the NRC perspective, including comments about trends of some key performance measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year and summarizes information from such sources as licensee event reports and reports to the NRC`s Operations Center. NUREG-1272, Vol. 10, No. 2, covers nuclear materials and presents a review of the events and concerns during 1996 associated with the use of licensed material in nonreactor applications, such as personnel overexposures and medical misadministrations. Both reports also contain a discussion of the Incident Investigation Team program and summarize both the Incident Investigation Team and Augmented Inspection Team reports. Each volume contains a list of the AEOD reports issued from CY 1980 through 1996. NUREG-1272, Vol. 10, No. 3, covers technical training and presents the activities of the Technical Training Center in support of the NRC`s mission in 1996.

NONE

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Jump to: navigation, search Name Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Place Burlington, Kansas Zip 66839-0411 Product Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation operates the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Kansas' first nuclear power generating station, for three utility owners in Kansas and Missouri. Coordinates 44.446275°, -108.431704° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.446275,"lon":-108.431704,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

350

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CH2M HILL CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) are committed to continuous improvement and will utilize principles of the DOE Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Partnering Policy to enhance teaming to further execute the Plateau Remediation Contract. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement More Documents & Publications CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company

351

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2 DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2 DOE issued the Draft SEIS for public review and comment by mailings to stakeholders and by announcements in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 1999, (64 FR 60430) (Attachment 4 of Volume I) and on November 12, 1999 (64 FR 61635) correcting a document title (Attachment 5 of Volume I). On

352

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mission Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement The U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and the Mission Support Alliance, LLC (MSA) are committed to continuous improvement and will partner together to enchance teaming to further execute the Mission Support Contract. This focused partnership is intended to improve the mission of the Hanford Site cleanup, emphasizing project safety, compliance and delivery completed on time and within cost. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement

353

Business Policy and Operations Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Organization » BPO Home Organization » BPO Home Business Policy and Operations (BPO) BPO Home Leadership Organization Chart .pdf file (195KB) Business Management and Planning (BMP) Division SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Contact Information Business Policy & Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-45/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-0192 F: (301) 903-2481 More Information » Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page The Office of Business Policy and Operations (BPO) is the provider of information technology and information resource services for systems supporting the DOE Office of Science (SC) Headquarters. We are a focused group committed to implementing the organization's strategic and operating plans, and helping our customers accelerate business innovation through

354

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sylvania Corning Nuclear...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

to SYLVANIA CORNING NUCLEAR CORP., INC., SYLVANIA LABORATORIES NY.07-1 - Letter, Smith to Norris, Contract at (30-1)-1293- U Metal Requirements, March 5, 1953 NY.07-2 -...

355

Office of Headquarters Security Operations: Questions and Answers on the  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Questions and Answers on the New Access Control System at DOE Headquarters Questions and Answers on the New Access Control System at DOE Headquarters Q1 Why is the current access control system to security areas being changed? Q2 How is the new access control system different from the existing one? Q3 Who is affected? Q4 When will the new proximity card readers be installed? Q5 How will affected personnel at DOE HQ be notified about the installation of the proximity card readers that will affect their access to the HQ facilities and security areas, and the actions they will be required to take to assure their HSPD-12 badge will operate in the new readers? Q6 What will DOE HQ "Q" and "L" badged employees need to do? Q7 Will all DOE HQ security areas be changed out to the new access control system at the same time?

356

Operating nuclear plant feedback to ASME and French codes  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The French have an advantage in nuclear plant operating experience feedback due to the highly centralized nature of their nuclear industry. There is only one utility in charge of design as well as operations (EDF) and only one reactor vendor (Framatome). The ASME Code has played a key role in resolving technical issues in the design and operation of nuclear plants since the inception of nuclear power. The committee structure of the Code brings an ideal combination of senior technical people with both broad and specialized experience to bear on complex how safe is safe enough technical issues. The authors now see an even greater role for the ASME Code in a proposed new regulatory era for the US nuclear industry. The current legalistic confrontational regulatory era has been quite destructive. There now appears to be a real opportunity to begin a new era of technical consensus as the primary means for resolving safety issues. This change can quickly be brought about by having the industry take operating plant problems and regulatory technical issues directly to the ASME Code for timely resolution. Surprisingly, there is no institution in the US nuclear industry with such a mandate. In fact, the industry is organized to feedback through the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issues which could be far better resolved through the ASME Code. Major regulatory benefits can be achieved by closing this loop and providing systematic interaction with the ASME Code. The essential elements of a new regulatory era and ideas for organizing US institutional industry responsibilities, taken from the French experience, are described in this paper.

Journet, J. [Electricite de France, Clamart (France); O`Donnell, W.J. [O`Donnell Consulting Engineers, Bethel Park, PA (United States)

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

358

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

359

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

360

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

362

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

363

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

364

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

365

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

366

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

367

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

368

2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

369

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

370

20 - Licensing for nuclear power plant siting, construction and operation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract: This chapter addresses the need for licensing of nuclear power plants, and how such licenses can be requested by an applicant and granted by a regulatory authority. The licensing process is country dependent, although based on the common principle that the applicant must demonstrate that the proposed nuclear power plant will comply with the established regulations, and that it will operate safely without undue risks to the health and safety of plant personnel, the population and the environment. During the construction and operational phases the regulatory authority ensures compliance with the the license conditions through evaluation, monitoring and inspection. The license may be a single document covering all the phases in the life of the plant, or a set of consecutive documents requested and issued for different phases, which may include design certification, site approval, design and construction, commissioning and operation, design changes during operation, life extension and, finally, decommissioning.

A. Alonso; S.K. Sharma; D.F. Torgerson

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

Office of Secure Transportation | National Nuclear Security Administra...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

from which OST Federal Agents operate: Albuquerque, New Mexico; Amarillo, Texas; and Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The OST Training Command is located at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas. A key...

372

Alarm Response Training Academy opens at Y-12 | National Nuclear...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Harrington, NNSA Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation; and Morgan Smith, Chief Operating Officer, Consolidated Nuclear Security. The free course taught at...

373

Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data 1992 annual report: Power reactors. Volume 7, No. 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) is devoted to the activities performed during 1992. The report is published in two separate parts. NUREG-1272, Vol. 7, No. 1, covers power reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry from the NRC perspective, including comments about the trends of some key performance, measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year, and summarizes information from such sources as licensee event report% diagnostic evaluations, and reports to the NRC`s Operations Center. The reports contain a discussion of the Incident Investigation Team program and summarize the Incident Investigation Team and Augmented Inspection Team reports for that group of licensees. NUREG-1272, Vol. 7, No. 2, covers nonreactors and presents a review of the events and concerns during 1992 associated with the use of licensed material in nonreactor applications, such as personnel overexposures and medical misadministrations. Each volume contains a list of the AEOD reports issued for 1984--1992.

none,

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Integrating Nuclear Energy to Oilfield Operations Two Case Studies  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Fossil fuel resources that require large energy inputs for extraction, such as the Canadian oil sands and the Green River oil shale resource in the western USA, could benefit from the use of nuclear power instead of power generated by natural gas combustion. This paper discusses the technical and economic aspects of integrating nuclear energy with oil sands operations and the development of oil shale resources. A high temperature gas reactor (HTGR) that produces heat in the form of high pressure steam (no electricity production) was selected as the nuclear power source for both fossil fuel resources. Both cases were based on 50,000 bbl/day output. The oil sands case was a steam-assisted, gravity-drainage (SAGD) operation located in the Canadian oil sands belt. The oil shale development was an in-situ oil shale retorting operation located in western Colorado, USA. The technical feasibility of the integrating nuclear power was assessed. The economic feasibility of each case was evaluated using a discounted cash flow, rate of return analysis. Integrating an HTGR to both the SAGD oil sands operation and the oil shale development was found to be technically feasible for both cases. In the oil sands case, integrating an HTGR eliminated natural gas combustion and associated CO2 emissions, although there were still some emissions associated with imported electrical power. In the in situ oil shale case, integrating an HTGR reduced CO2 emissions by 88% and increased natural gas production by 100%. Economic viabilities of both nuclear integrated cases were poorer than the non-nuclear-integrated cases when CO2 emissions were not taxed. However, taxing the CO2 emissions had a significant effect on the economics of the non-nuclear base cases, bringing them in line with the economics of the nuclear-integrated cases. As we move toward limiting CO2 emissions, integrating non-CO2-emitting energy sources to the development of energy-intense fossil fuel resources is becoming increasingly important. This paper attempts to reduce the barriers that have traditionally separated fossil fuel development and application of nuclear power and to promote serious discussion of ideas about hybrid energy systems.

Eric P. Robertson; Lee O. Nelson; Michael G. McKellar; Anastasia M. Gandrik; Mike W. Patterson

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

The nuclear heated steam reformer Design and semitechnical operating experiences  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Good operating experiences of the EVA I- and EVA II-plant have been described. Therin the comparison of the different catalyst concepts has been given. Further the behaviour of the bundle of EVA II plant by isolation of individual reformer tubes as well as the performance of the bundle under transient conditions have been explained. Different design concepts for a nuclear heated steam reformer based on the concentric tubes and baffles have been given. Main points of studies are constructional details, thermohydraulic of the bundle and stress analysis. It can be shown that the present standard of knowledge allows the application of the steam reformer for coal refinement with nuclear heat.

J. Singh; H.F. Niessen; R. Harth; H. Fedders; H. Reutler; W. Panknin; W.D. Mller; H.G. Harms

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Operations Improvement Committee | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Operations Improvement Committee Operations Improvement Committee Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Oversight Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Operations Improvement Committee Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science (SC)-the lead federal agency supporting fundamental scientific research for energy and the Nation's largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences-has two principal thrusts: direct support of scientific research and direct

377

Nuclear Safety Information Agreement Between the U.S. Nuclear...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Operations (NRC)), Jim O'Brien, Director, Office of Nuclear Safety (EHSS DOE), Robert Johnson (Chief, Fuel Manufacturing Branch (NRC)) Front Row: Matt Moury, Associate Under...

378

Review of Nevada Site Office Criticality Safety Assessments at...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

an independent review of the National Nuclear Security AdministrationNevada Site Office Conduct of Operations Management Assessment Final Report, dated October 2011. The subject...

379

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO) FY 2014 HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Executive Summary: The mission of the Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) is to enable the Department of Energy's urgent missions in energy, science, and nuclear security through the power of information and technology in a manner that balances risk with required outcomes in programs that span from open science to national security. DOE promotes effective operations by encouraging performance-based management and facilitating the restructuring of mission- and business-related processes, where appropriate, before making significant IT investments to improve the performance and cost-effectiveness of the Department's information

380

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Nuclear Energy Oak Ridge Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

anagers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

382

Office of Security Policy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Security Policy Office of Security Policy Mission and Functions The Office of Security Policy develops and promulgates safeguards and security policy governing the protection of National Security and other critical assets entrusted to the Department. Director's Perspective Welcome to the Office of Security Policy Jack Cowden, Director The Office of Security Policy analyzes, develops and interprets safeguards and security policy governing national security functions and the protection of related critical assets entrusted to the Department. This includes the protection of DOE nuclear facilities, nuclear weapons components, special nuclear materials and classified information. Our broad topical areas are organized as: Program Planning and Management, Protection Program Operations (which includes both physical security and protective forces), Information Security and Material Control and Accountability.

383

Audit of the Contractor Incentive Program at the Nevada Operations Office, IG-0412  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20, 1997 20, 1997 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: John C. Layton Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of the Contractor Incentive Program at the Nevada Operations Office" BACKGROUND: The Department of Energy (Department) is using performance-based contracts to address problems associated with its traditional management and operating contracts. Under this approach, contractor performance is to be evaluated against performance measures which are clearly stated, results-oriented, and established prior to performance. The performance measures, which reflect the Department's expectations of the contractor, are the basis for rewarding superior contractor performance

384

Office of River Protection Assessment of Contractor Quality Assurance and Operational Awareness at Tank Farms, June 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR-HANFORD-2013-06-17 HIAR-HANFORD-2013-06-17 Site: Hanford, Office of River Protection Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Office of River Protection (ORP) Assessment of Contractor Quality Assurance, Operational Awareness at Hanford Tank Farms Dates of Activity : June 17-20, 2013 Report Preparer: Robert E. Farrell Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (Independent Oversight) Site Lead conducted an operational awareness visit to the ORP Hanford Tank Farms, observed a Tank Farms morning meeting, toured the C Tank Farm, and observed a heavy (34,000 pound) lift. Result: Independent Oversight, together with the ORP Facility Representative, toured the C Tank Farm to observe workers setting

385

Resilience and Procedure Use in the Training of Nuclear Power Plant Operating Crews.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

?? Control room operating crews are a crucial component in maintaining the safety of nuclear power plants. The primary support to operators during disturbances or (more)

Gustavsson, Pr

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

386

Nuclear Materials Management U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In light of the changing Defense Complex mission, the high cost to storing and protecting nuclear materials, and in consideration of scarcity of resources, it is imperative that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) owned nuclear materials are managed effectively. The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Strategic Action Plan outlines the strategy for continuing to meet Americas nuclear security goals, meeting the overall mission challenges of DOE and NNSA as well as giving focus to local missions. The mission of the NNSA/NSO Nuclear Materials Management (NMM) Program is to ensure that nuclear material inventories are accurately assessed and reported, future material needs are adequately planned, and that existing Nevada Test Site (NTS) inventories are efficiently utilized, staged, or dispositioned. The NNSA/NSO understands that the NTS has unique characteristics to serve and benefit the nation with innovative solutions to the complex problems involving Special Nuclear Materials, hazardous materials, and multi-agency, integrated operations. The NNSA/NSO is defining infrastructure requirements for known future missions, developing footprint consolidation strategic action plans, and continuing in the path of facility modernization improvements. The NNSA/NSO is striving for the NTS to be acknowledged as an ideal location towards mission expansion and growth. The NTS has the capability of providing isolated, large scale construction and development locations for nuclear power or alternate energy source facilities, expanded nuclear material storage sites, and for new development in green technology.

Jesse Schreiber

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

387

Machine Shop Safe Operations Assessment Plan - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 2003 - Machine Shop Safe Operations July 2003 - Machine Shop Safe Operations Utilize 29 CFR 1910 Utilize applicable LLNL, LANL, DTRA, BN procedures VALUE ADDED FOR: AMTS Contractor Assurance Focus Area AMTS ISM Improvements Focus Area AMTS Safety Precursors/Hazards Analysis Focus Area AMTS Environment, Safety, & Health Division MACHINE SHOP SAFE OPERATIONS Assessment Plan NNSA/Nevada Site Office Independent Oversight Division Performance Objective: The purpose of this assessment is to verify that machine shop operators are provided a safe and healthful workplace which will reduce or prevent injuries, illnesses, and accidental losses. Criteria: A worker protection program shall be implemented that provides a place of employment free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause

388

Seismic functionality of essential relays in operating nuclear plants  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The regulatory criteria for licensing of nuclear power plants require that certain safety-related equipment and systems be designed to function during and following a postulated, design basis earthquake. Demonstration of seismic adequacy must be performed and formally documented by shake-table testing, analysis or other specified methods. Since many older, operating nuclear power plants were designed and constructed prior to the issuance of the current seismic qualification criteria, the NRC has questioned whether the seismic adequacy of the essential equipment has been adequately demonstrated and documented. This concern is identified in Unresolved Safety Issue A-46, Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Nuclear Power Plants. In response to this concern, a group of affected plant owners, the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG), with support from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), has undertaken a program to demonstrate the seismic adequacy of essential equipment by the use of actual experience with such equipment in plants which have undergone significant earthquakes and by the use of available seismic qualification data for similar equipment. An important part of this program is the development of data and the methodology for verifying the functionality of electrical relays used in essential circuits needed for plant shutdown during a seismic event. This paper describes this part of the Seismic Qualification Utility Group program. The relay functionality evaluation methodology is being developed under EPRI Project No. RP2849-1.

W.R. Schmidt; R.P. Kassawara

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Innovations in Nuclear Infrastructure  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Innovations in Nuclear Infrastructure Innovations in Nuclear Infrastructure and Education (INIE) Innovations in Nuclear Infrastructure and Education (INIE) Presented to the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee Crystal City, Virginia John Gutteridge Director, University Programs Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology September 30 - October 1, 2002 Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Gutteridge/Sep-Oct_02 INIE-NERAC.ppt (2) INIE The Stimuli .... INIE The Stimuli .... 6 Declining number of operating university research/training reactors 6 Dwindling student population in nuclear engineering 6 Closing or loss of identity of university nuclear engineering programs 6 Looming shortage of nuclear engineering graduates 6 Threat of additional reactor closures -- Cornell, Michigan, MIT

390

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- United Nuclear Corp - MO 0-03  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

United Nuclear Corp - MO 0-03 United Nuclear Corp - MO 0-03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UNITED NUCLEAR CORP. (MO.0-03) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Mallinckrodt Chemical Works Mallinckrodt Nuclear Corporation MO.0-03-1 MO.0-03-2 Location: Hematite , Missouri MO.0-03-1 Evaluation Year: Circa 1987 MO.0-03-3 Site Operations: Commercial fuel fabrication operation. Licensed to reclaim unirradiated enriched uranium from scrap generated in fuel fabrication and fuel material preparation. MO.0-03-1 MO.0-03-2 MO.0-03-3 MO.0-03-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - NRC licensed - Commercial operations MO.0-03-3 MO.0-03-5 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium MO.0-03-3 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated

391

Office  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

* provided the Bloch Equations * provided the Feynman Diagrams * created the first self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction * established international computer communication in 1970...

392

Report to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission on analysis and evaluation of operational data - 1987: Power reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD) is devoted to the activities performed during 1987. The report is published in two volumes. NUREG-1272, Vol. 2, No. 1, covers Power Reactors and presents an overview of the operating experience of the nuclear power industry, with comments regarding the trends of some key performance measures. The report also includes the principal findings and issues identified in AEOD studies over the past year, and summarizes information from Licensee Event Reports, the NRC's Operations Center, and Diagnostic Evaluations. NUREG-1272, Vol. 2, No. 2, covers Nonreactors and presents a review of the nonreactors events and misadministration reports that were reported in 1987 and a brief synopsis of AEOD studies published in 1987. Each volume contains a list of the AEOD Reports issued for 1980-1987.

none,

1988-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

Assessment of the Plutonium Finishing Plant Criticality Alarm System U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At the request of the Assistant Manager for Safety and Engineering, the U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (RL) Engineering Support Division, performed an oversight review of the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) nuclear Criticality Alarm System (CAS). The review was conducted to satisfy requirements and agreements associated with Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (DNFSB) Recommendation 2000-2, ''Vital Safety Systems.'' The PFP is managed by Fluor Hanford, Inc. for RL. The field assessment and staff interviews were conducted August 12 through August 19,2002. This was a limited scope assessment that consisted of a review of the nuclear CAS operations, maintenance, and compliance with National Consensus Standards Requirements. The main purpose of the assessment was to determine the adequacy of the existing alarm system and its associated infrastructure to support the PFP facility mission through the remaining facility lifetime. The Review Plan was modeled upon Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRAD) developed for DNFSB Recommendation 2000-2 reviews conducted across the Hanford Site. Concerns regarding component degradation and failure, increasing numbers of occurrence reports associated with the alarm system, and reliability issues were addressed. Additionally, RL performed a review of the engineering aspects of the CAS including the functions of design authorities and aspects of systems engineering. However, the focus of the assessment was on operations, maintenance, and reliability of the CAS, associated procurement practices, adequacy of safety and engineering policies and procedures, safety documentation, and fundamental engineering practices including training, qualification, and systems engineering. This assessment revealed that the PFP CAS and its associated infrastructure, administrative procedures, and conduct of operations are generally effective. There are no imminent criticality safety issues associated with the operation of the existing CAS. The Assessment Team believes that the CAS, as it presently exists at the PFP facility, is adequate to support the remaining mission lifetime of the facility while continuing to ensure personnel safety. This conclusion is dependent upon a continued level of funding adequate to support the required maintenance and occasional system upgrade. Two findings were identified during this assessment. Additionally, the report identified eight observations and two recommendations. The assessment revealed that recent changes to OSR compliance procedures and other documents do not contain the signature of the CSR as required by procedure. Lack of appropriate approval signatures is a noncompliance with site-level procedures.

NIRIDER, L.T.

2002-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

Federal Energy and Water Management Award Winner 22nd Operations Group Fuel Efficiency Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Efficiency Efficiency Office U.S. Air Force McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas During FY 2012, the 22nd Operations Group Fuel Efficiency Office (FEO) designed and implemented multiple measures, including a focus on institutional culture change, to reduce inefficiency in fuel management of the KC-135 aircraft and save the Air Force $4.3 million during a 42 percent rise in local sorties (the deployment of aircraft for missions of national defense or aircrew proficiency). These efforts included reducing KC-135 landing fuel by 5000 lb per sortie to save 1.94 million gallons per year; changing the KC-135 standard landing configuration to save 50 lb of fuel per approach; and implementing a new training configuration to reduce aircraft basic weight by 1,600 lb. The FEO also incorporated Mission Index Flying

395

Safeguarding Nuclear Fuel Processing | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Safeguarding Nuclear Safeguarding Nuclear Fuel Processing Laboratory Policy and Evaluation (LPE) LPE Home Staff M&O Contracts SC Laboratory Appraisal Process Laboratory Planning Process Work for Others in the Office of Science Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) DOE's Philosophy on LDRD Frequently Asked Questions Success Stories Brochures Additional Information LDRD Program Contacts Technology Transfer DOE National Laboratories Contact Information Laboratory Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of Energy SC-32/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5447 F: (202) 586-3119 Success Stories Safeguarding Nuclear Fuel Processing Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Idaho National Laboratory Develops International Nonproliferation

396

Projection Operator Formalisms and the Nuclear Shell Model  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The shell model solve the nuclear many-body problem in a restricted model space and takes into account the restricted nature of the space by using effective interactions and operators. In this paper two different methods for generating the effective interactions are considered. One is based on a partial solution of the Schrodinger equation (Bloch-Horowitz or the Feshbach projection formalism) and other on linear algebra (Lee-Suzuki). The two methods are derived in a parallel manner so that the difference and similarities become apparent. The connections with the renormalization group are also pointed out.

B. K. Jennings

2005-04-13T23:59:59.000Z

397

Deputy Director for Field Operations Homepage | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Home Home Deputy Director for Field Operations Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Oversight Operations Improvement Committee Contact Information Deputy Director for Field Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-3/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5434 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page The DOE laboratory system is the most comprehensive research system of its kind in the world, and constitutes a critical strategic scientific and technical resource. The Office of Science has responsibility for 10 of the 17 DOE laboratories, helping to ensure they deliver exceptional scientific productivity benefiting the taxpayer. Each laboratory is

398

Pacific Northwest Laboratory annual report for 1985 to the DOE Office of the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health. Part 5. Overview and assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This volume is progress on work performed for the Office of Nuclear Safety, the Office of Operational Safety, and for the Office of Environmental Analysis for each project. Separate abstracts have been prepared for individual projects. ACR

Faust, L.G.

1986-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

Ed Jascevsky Safety Division ChIcago Operations Office MIT CONTFACT INFCE"ATION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

;/:4,4 (; . 1.; ;/:4,4 (; . 1.; e octo: ' J : 18, 1976 Ed Jascevsky Safety Division ChIcago Operations Office MIT CONTFACT INFCE"ATION During the discussions on October 8, 1976, you iquired about information relative to work done by MIT as background infomation for survey planning. The enclosed information is parephrased frorc an unpublished history of program work carried out by the Process Eevclopncnt Group of the Dl.ti,si.on of Raw Katerids, I believe this work was done under contract nuder AT(30-1)956. Robert IE. Allen Process Facilities Safety Branch Division of Safety, Standards, and Compliance Fnclosure: As stated I I . ..--@q$?.. .... ............................................ ........ ..- .......................... . ... ... .- ................... .._ ................ .... ..__ ..............

400

Radioactive waste isolation in salt: peer review of Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation's Socioeconomic Program Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The following recommendations have been abstracted from the body of this report. The Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation's Socioeconomic Program Plan for the Establishment of Mined Geologic Repositories to Isolate Nuclear Waste should be modified to: (1) encourage active public participation in the decision-making processes leading to repository site selection; (2) clearly define mechanisms for incorporating the concerns of local residents, state and local governments, and other potentially interested parties into the early stages of the site selection process. In addition, the Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation should carefully review the overall role that these persons and groups, including local pressure groups organized in the face of potential repository development, will play in the siting process; (3) place significantly greater emphasis on using primary socioeconomic data during the site selection process, reversing the current overemphasis on secondary data collection, description of socioeconomic conditions at potential locations, and development of analytical methodologies; (4) include additional approaches to solving socioeconomic problems. For example, a reluctance to acknowledge that solutions to socioeconomic problems need to be found jointly with interested parties is evident in the plan; (5) recognize that mitigation mechanisms other than compensation and incentives may be effective; (6) as soon as potential sites are identified, the US Department of Energy (DOE) should begin discussing impact mitigation agreements with local officials and other interested parties; and (7) comply fully with the pertinent provisions of NWPA.

Winter, R.; Fenster, D.; O'Hare, M.; Zillman, D.; Harrison, W.; Tisue, M.

1984-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

TO : S. R. Sapirie, Manager C&c Ridge Operations Office FROM  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

3@ceW 3@ceW emdtid#m . UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO : S. R. Sapirie, Manager C&c Ridge Operations Office FROM SULtJECTC TESTING OF SARPLR GF THORITE 'XRXX3lTRATE Symbol: RMtCWT ' .. DATE November 21r, 19% W&have received several inquirie s recently from mine owners and operators'in the western states, principally Colorado, who are potential producers of thorite concentrates. Upon the basis of preliminary data presently available there is a possibility that significant quantities of thorium may become available from this source at reasonable prices. In connection with our discussions with these potential suppliers it would be helpful to have information concerning the processing 4; ( which would be required to convert thorite concentrates jllto

402

C&ago Operations and Regional Office 9800 South Cass Avenue  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

)53u Y )53u Y De artment of Energy . C&ago Operations and Regional Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 P P. R July 14, 1981 Billy D. ghfpp, Director Operational end Rwironmental Safety Division SDBJECT: CARPENTER ISCNNOLQGY GORPORATION, CARPENTER STIWL DIVISION, l&WING, P!6lQWTLVAMA A visit wea made to Carpenter Technology Corp., Carpenter Steel Division, Rnading, Pennsylvania, on June 7, 1981, by Paul Neeaon, DOE, end personnel of Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). ' Ihe AML perronnel included U. Smith, J. Thereon, D. Reilly, and C. Mayes. I0e group met with Mike Echalk, legal counsel, for Cerpsnter. ' Ihe purpose of the virit wee to perform a cursory rediological rurvey of certain area, at the above location, and to gather

403

Operations Authorization Assessment plan - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Operations Authorization Operations Authorization Assessment Plan NNSA/Nevada Site Office Independent Oversight Division Performance Objective: The objective of this assessment is to verify there is documentation in place which accurately describes the safety envelope for a facility, program or project. Criteria: Conditions and requirements should be established to ensure programs addressing all applicable functional areas are adequately implemented to support safe performance of the work. The extent of documentation and level of authority for agreement shall be tailored to the complexity and hazards associated with the work. Personnel shall be responsible and accountable for performance of work in accordance with the controls established. Controls established for safety are a discernible part of the plan for

404

Environmental Monitoring Plan United States Department of Energy Richland Operations Office. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Environmental Monitoring Plan was prepared for the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Richland Operations Office (RL) to implement the requirements of DOE Order 5400.1. According to the Order, each DOE site, facility, or activity that uses, generates, releases, or manages significant pollutants or hazardous materials shall prepare a written environmental monitoring plan covering two major activities: (1) effluent monitoring and (2) environmental surveillance. The plan is to contain information discussing the rationale and design criteria for the monitoring programs, sampling locations and schedules, quality assurance requirements, program implementation procedures, analytical procedures, and reporting requirements. The plan`s purpose is to assist DOE in the management of environmental activities at the Hanford Site and to help ensure that operations on the site are conducted in an environmentally safe and sound manner.

NONE

1997-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

405

Office of Nuclear Energy Response to Fukushima Dai-ichi Incident  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Response to Fukushima Dai-ichi Response to Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident John E. Kelly Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Reactor Technologies Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy June 15, 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi Reactors Fukushima Dai-ichi Reactors Earthquake 3/11 14:36 JST Earthquake 15:41 JST Tsunami Magnitude: 9.0 Generated a 14m Tsunami Many thousands perished More that 100 thousand people were homeless without food, water, or heat 5 Accident Sequence for Fukushima Dai-ichi Reactors  Grid power lost due to the earthquake  Plant experienced station blackout after emergency diesels were damaged by the tsunami (nearly 1 hour later)  Eventual loss of batteries and cooling to control steam driven emergency pumps  Core overheats, cladding oxidizes and melts producing hydrogen

406

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities, June 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Pantex Site Office's Compliance with Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Assessment Methodologies and Approach ........................................................................................... 1

407

Review of the Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities, June 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Pantex Site Office's Compliance with Pantex Site Office's Compliance with DOE Order 425.1D, Verification of Readiness to Start Up or Restart Nuclear Facilities June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Assessment Methodologies and Approach ........................................................................................... 1

408

Identification of good practices in the operation of nuclear power plants  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This work developed an approach to diagnose problems and identify good practices in the operation of nuclear power plants using the system dynamics technique. The research began with construction of the ORSIM (Nuclear Power ...

Chen, Haibo, 1975-

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

409

Nuclear Safeguards and Nonproliferation Support | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Nuclear Safeguards and Nonproliferation Support Nuclear Safeguards and Nonproliferation Support New Brunswick Laboratory (NBL) NBL Home About Programs Certified Reference Materials Program Measurement Evaluation Nuclear Safeguards and Nonproliferation Support Measurement Services Measurement Development Training Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) Training Categorical Exclusion Determinations News Contact Information New Brunswick Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Building 350 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439-4899 P: (630) 252-2442 (NBL) P: (630) 252-2767 (CRM sales) F: (630) 252-6256 E: usdoe.nbl@ch.doe.gov Programs Nuclear Safeguards and Nonproliferation Support Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page New Brunswick Laboratory (NBL) is owned and operated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). NBL is the U.S. Government's Certifying Authority for

410

Concept of Operations for Nuclear Warhead Embedded Sensors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Embedded arms-control-sensors provide a powerful new paradigm for managing compliance with future nuclear weapons treaties, where deployed warhead numbers will be reduced to 1000 or less. The CONOPS (Concept of Operations) for use with these sensors is a practical tool with which one may help define design parameters, including size, power, resolution, communications, and physical structure. How frequently must data be acquired and must a human be present? Will such data be acquired for only stored weapons or will it be required of deployed weapons as well? Will tactical weapons be subject to such monitoring or will only strategic weapons apply? Which data will be most crucial? Will OSI's be a component of embedded sensor data management or will these sensors stand alone in their data extraction processes? The problem space is massive, but can be constrained by extrapolating to a reasonable future treaty regime and examining the bounded options this scenario poses. Arms control verification sensors, embedded within the warhead case or aeroshell, must provide sufficient but not excessively detailed data, confirming that the item is a nuclear warhead and that it is a particular warhead without revealing sensitive information. Geolocation will be provided by an intermediate transceiver used to acquire the data and to forward the data to a central processing location. Past Chain-of-Custody projects have included such devices and will be primarily responsible for adding such indicators in the future. For the purposes of a treaty regime a TLI will be verified as a nuclear warhead by knowledge of (a) the presence and mass of SNM, (b) the presence of HE, and (c) the reporting of a unique tag ID. All of these parameters can be obtained via neutron correlation measurements, Raman spectroscopy, and fiber optic grating fabrication, respectively. Data from these sensors will be pushed out monthly and acquired nearly daily, providing one of several verification layers in depth, including on-site inspections, NTM, declarations, and semi-annual BCC meetings. Human intervention will not be necessary. The sheer numbers, small size, and wide distribution of warhead TLIs will mandate the added level of remote monitoring that Embedded Sensors can provide. This multilayer protection will limit the need to increase the frequency of OSIs, by adding confidence that declared TLIs remain as declared and that no undeclared items enter the regime without the other States Party's knowledge. Acceptance of Embedded arms control Sensor technologies will require joint development by all State's Parties involved. Principles of operation and robustness of technologies must be individually evaluated to sustain confidence in the strength of this system against attack. Weapons designers must be assured that these sensors will in no way impact weapon performance and operation, will not affect weapons security and safety, and will have a neutral impact upon weapon system surety. Each State's Party will need to conduct an in depth review of their weapons lifecycle to determine where moves may be reduced to minimize vulnerabilities and where random selection may be used to minimize the ability to make undeclared changes. In the end Verification is a political measure, not a technical one. If the potential users can gain sufficient confidence in the application of Embedded arms control Sensors, they could constitute the final layer of glue to hold together the next Nuclear Arms Control agreement.

Rockett, P D; Koncher, T R

2012-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

411

Audit of Work Force Restructuring at the Oak Ridge Operations Office, ER-B-95-06  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF WORK FORCE RESTRUCTURING AT THE OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS OFFICE The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov Department of Energy Headquarters Anonymous FTP vm1.hqadmin.doe.gov U.S. Department of Energy Human Resources and Administration Home Page

412

Warehouses in New York, New York To: J. LaGrone Manager Oak Ridge Operations Office  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

,' ,' .sd "IcI.V.2 U".W.. . ..* . . .._ inemo+indUm DATE: ADO 031sso .~.. - -.-. - ._ xiveI,,-r &8/ ",P& -gm?j4P hw 4 1 REPLY t-0 ATTNOF: EM-40 (A. Williams, 3-5439) /"Y . SUBJECT: Authorization for Remedial Action at the Former Baker and Williams Warehouses in New York, New York To: J. LaGrone Manager Oak Ridge Operations Office The site of the former Baker and Williams Warehouses in New York City is hereby authorized for remedial action under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Project (FUSRAP). The designation survey performed by ORAU found contamination in one of the three warehouses in excess of DOE guidelines on floors and lower walls in the east bay of the basement and on the floor of the west bay of the first floor.

413

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - DOE-SR News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Releases Releases DOE-SR News Releases GROUTING TO BEGIN TOMORROW ON TWO ADDITIONAL SRS WASTE TANKS SR-2013-08 Adobe Acrobat PDF PARSONS' SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY PROJECT EARNS DOE VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM MERIT AWARD SR-2013-07 Adobe Acrobat PDF Public Comment Sought for Savannah River Site Workforce Restructuring Plan SR-2013-06 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board Seeking New Members SR-2013-05 Adobe Acrobat PDF Salt Waste Processing Facility: New Leadership SR-2013-04 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Exceeds Waste Shipment Goals SR-2013-03 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Operations Office Honors Federal Manager of the Year SR-2013-02 Adobe Acrobat PDF SRS Advisory Board to Hold Augusta Public Meeting March 25-26 SR-2013-01 Adobe Acrobat PDF

414

Ch P cage Operations and Regional Office 9800 South Cass Avenue  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

artment of Energy artment of Energy Ch P cage Operations and Regional Office 9800 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 OCT 2 1 1980 Ki.lliam E. Mott, Director Environmental Cinttol Technology Division, KC! SUBJECT I PREHIER MANUFACTURING - SPRINGDALE, PEhVSYLVA?UA A visit to Premier Manufacturing, 644 Garfield, Springdalc, Pennsylvania, was made en October 6, 1980, by Edward J. Jascewsky and Art Whitman, Department of Energy, and Walter R. Smith, Argonne National Laboratory. The group met with Edward McClesky, Premier Manufacturing and Bud Schnoor, PPG Industries, Inc. The purpose of the visit was to perform a cursory radiological survey of the facility at the above location. In addition, discussions were held with Mr. Schnoor whose family previously owned the facility and performed the

415

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Nuclear Energy | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 6, 2010 May 6, 2010 CX-002327: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Facility Area and Advanced Test Reactor-Complex Analytical and Research and Development Laboratory Operation (Overarching) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/06/2010 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Idaho Operations Office, Nuclear Energy April 16, 2010 CX-002192: Categorical Exclusion Determination Site Wide Well Abandonment Activities CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B3.1 Date: 04/16/2010 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Idaho Operations Office, Nuclear Energy April 16, 2010 CX-002584: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nuclear Fabrication Consortium CX(s) Applied: B3.6, A9, A11 Date: 04/16/2010 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Idaho Operations Office, Nuclear Energy April 12, 2010 CX-001627: Categorical Exclusion Determination

416

Science Program Office, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Home  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office Science Program Office Applied Energy Civilian Nuclear Office of Science Applied Energy Programs Office of Science Civilian Nuclear Program Directors Applied Energy Programs...

417

Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 9, 2010 L'Enfant Plaza Hotel Washington, D.C. Committee Members Participating John Ahearne Raymond Juzaitis Ashok Bhatnagar William Martin, Chair Dana Christensen Carl Paperiello Thomas Cochran Burton Richter Michael Corradini John Sackett Marvin Fertel Allen Sessoms Donald Hintz Neil Todreas Committee Members Absent Brew Barron Susan Ion Other Participants: Richard Black, Director, Office of Advanced Reactor Concepts, Office of Nuclear Energy, USDOE Nancy Carder, Medical University of South Carolina, NEAC Support Staff David Hill, Director, Institute for Nuclear Energy Science and Technology, Idaho National Laboratory Shane Johnson, Chief Operating Officer, Office of Nuclear Energy, USDOE

418

Operational Awareness Oversight of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Performance of the Contractor Assurance System Program, April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR PORTS-2012-09-24 HIAR PORTS-2012-09-24 Site: Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Operational Awareness Oversight of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office (PPPO) Performance of the Contractor Assurance System (CAS) Program Dates of Activity : 09/24/12 - 10/04/12 Report Preparer: Joseph P. Drago Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) shadowed PPPO's review of specific elements of the Fluor-B&W Portsmouth (FBP) CAS program at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS). The review was limited to three requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 226.1B, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Policy:

419

DOE Nevada Operations Office Environmental Protection Implementation Plan, November 9, 1993--November 9, 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE Order 5400.1, ``General Environmental Protection Program,`` established environmental protection program requirements, authorities, and responsibilities to assure that the Department of Energy (DOE) operations are in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal department policies. Chapter III of DOE Order 5400.1 required that each field organization prepare a plan for implementing the requirements of this order by no later than November 9, 1989, and update the plan annually. Therefore, the Department of Energy/Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) has prepared this fourth annual update of its Environmental Protection Implementation Plan (EPIP). The Order and corresponding guidances also require estimated budgetary resources necessary for implementation of the Order be identified in the Environmental Protection Implementation Plan. To satisfy this requirement, the estimated costs to effectuate necessary changes in existing programs or processes and to institute new programs or processes for compliance with the Order are provided in the following sections of this plan. The DOE/NV Assistant Manager for Environment, Safety, Security, & Health (AMESSH), in consultation with other organizations responsible for line management of plan implementation, is responsible for annual plan revisions.

Elle, D.R. [USDOE Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, NV (United States); Townsend, Y.E. [ed.; Latham, A.R.; Black, S.C. [Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Co., Inc., Las Vegas, NV (United States)

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION' National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DETERMINATION' DETERMINATION' National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences; include title, general activities, location, timeframe) Kansas City Plant - Project 1712 Repair OF002 CIPP Liner Near AICO Inlet: repair Outfall No. 002 using an open cut replacement of the southern section, a slip lining of the northern section, and a manhole placed at the intersection of those sections. October 2010 thru April 201 1. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D.) B6.1 Small scale, short term cleanup actions under RCRA, Atomic Energy Act, or other authorities C. Regulatory Requirements in 10CFR 1021.410 (b): (See full text in regulation.) (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to Subpart D.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION! National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DETERMINATION! DETERMINATION! National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences; include title, general activities, location, timeframe) Kansas City Plant - Project 1615 - Building 16 PCB Decontamination: Areas within Building 16 that exhibit PCB contamination above the 10 ug/l00cm2 exposure threshold, as defined by the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (40 CFR Part 761), would be addressed under this project. February 2014 thru September 2014. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D.) B 1.17 - Removal of polychlorinated biphenyl-containing items from buildings, other above ground locations. C. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410 (b): (See full text in regulation.)

422

Condition monitoring of motor-operated valves in nuclear power plants Pierre Granjon  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Condition monitoring of motor-operated valves in nuclear power plants Pierre Granjon Gipsa of nuclear power plants. Unfortunately, today's policies present a major drawback. Indeed, these monitoring is illustrated through experimental data. 1. Introduction Nuclear power provides about 14% of the world

Boyer, Edmond

423

Functional segmentation of dynamic nuclear images by cross-?B-energy operator  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

We describe a new segmentation method of dynamic nuclear medicine images based on the cross-@J"B-energy operator. @J"B is a nonlinear measure which quantifies the interaction between two time-signals including their first and second derivatives. Similarity ... Keywords: Cross-?B-energy operator, Functional segmentation, Nuclear cardiac images, Time activity curve

Abdel-Ouahab Boudraa; Jean-Christophe Cexus; Habib Zaidi

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

424

Redesignation Order No. 00-09.01-01 to the Manager of Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Redesignation of the Manager of the Idaho Operations Office as the representative to perform as the "authorized representative," as that term is used in the NRC regulations at 10 CFR 72.16(b), and as name holder of the NRC license under 10 CFR 72 for the Idaho Spent Fuel Facility Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation.

2006-05-12T23:59:59.000Z

425

Enterprise SRS: Leveraging Ongoing Operations To Advance Nuclear Fuel Cycles Research And Development Programs  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Savannah River Site (SRS) is repurposing its vast array of assets to solve future national issues regarding environmental stewardship, national security, and clean energy. The vehicle for this transformation is Enterprise SRS which presents a new, radical view of SRS as a united endeavor for ''all things nuclear'' as opposed to a group of distinct and separate entities with individual missions and organizations. Key among the Enterprise SRS strategic initiatives is the integration of research into facilities in conjunction with on-going missions to provide researchers from other national laboratories, academic institutions, and commercial entities the opportunity to demonstrate their technologies in a relevant environment and scale prior to deployment. To manage that integration of research demonstrations into site facilities, The Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office, Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) have established a center for applied nuclear materials processing and engineering research (hereafter referred to as the Center). The key proposition of this initiative is to bridge the gap between promising transformational nuclear fuel cycle processing discoveries and large commercial-scale-technology deployment by leveraging SRS assets as facilities for those critical engineering-scale demonstrations necessary to assure the successful deployment of new technologies. The Center will coordinate the demonstration of R&D technologies and serve as the interface between the engineering-scale demonstration and the R&D programs, essentially providing cradle-to-grave support to the research team during the demonstration. While the initial focus of the Center will be on the effective use of SRS assets for these demonstrations, the Center also will work with research teams to identify opportunities to perform research demonstrations at other facilities. Unique to this approach is the fact that these SRS assets will continue to accomplish DOE's critical nuclear material missions (e.g., processing in H-Canyon and plutonium storage in K-Area). Thus, the demonstration can be accomplished by leveraging the incremental cost of performing demonstrations without needing to cover the full operational cost of the facility. Current Center activities have been focused on integrating advanced safeguards monitoring technologies demonstrations into the SRS H-Canyon and advanced location technologies demonstrations into K-Area Materials Storage. These demonstrations are providing valuable information to researchers and customers as well as providing the Center with an improved protocol for demonstration management that can be exercised across the entire SRS (as well as to offsite venues) so that future demonstrations can be done more efficiently and provide an opportunity to utilize these unique assets for multiple purposes involving national laboratories, academia, and commercial entities. Key among the envisioned future demonstrations is the use of H-Canyon to demonstrate new nuclear materials separations technologies critical for advancing the mission needs DOE-Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) to advance the research for next generation fuel cycle technologies. The concept is to install processing equipment on frames. The frames are then positioned into an H-Canyon cell and testing in a relevant radiological environment involving prototypic radioactive materials can be performed.

Murray, Alice M.; Marra, John E.; Wilmarth, William R.; Mcguire, Patrick W.; Wheeler, Vickie B.

2013-07-03T23:59:59.000Z

426

Assessment of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Conduct of Operations Oversight of the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Plants, May 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assessment of the Assessment of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Conduct of Operations Oversight of the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Plants May 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

427

Assessment of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Conduct of Operations Oversight of the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Plants, May 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Assessment of the Assessment of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office Conduct of Operations Oversight of the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Plants May 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

428

U. S. Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office - DOE-SR News  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Release Archive Release Archive DOE-SR News Release Archive 2012 News Releases Savannah River Site Reaches Significant Milestone with Waste Tank Closure SR-2012-06 Adobe Acrobat PDF DOE to Extend Savannah River Nuclear Solutions Contract at Savannah River Site to September 2016 SR-2012-05 Adobe Acrobat PDF Savannah River Site Federal Employees Volunteer for United Way Campaign SR-2012-04 Adobe Acrobat PDF Installation of Six Large Process Tanks Mark Big Step in Construction of Critical Waste Cleanup Facility at SRS SR-2012-03 Adobe Acrobat PDF Grouting Begins on First SRS Waste Tanks Since 1997 SR-2012-02 Adobe Acrobat PDF SRS Marks Successful Operational Startup of New Biomass Cogeneration Facility SR-2012-01 Adobe Acrobat PDF 2011 News Releases Recovery Act Funds Test Reactor Dome Removal in Historic D&D Project

429

US Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office annual site environmental report, 1992. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report contains the environmental monitoring and assessment results for the Nevada Test Site for 1992. Monitoring and surveillance on and around the NTS by DOE contractors and Site user organizations during 1992 indicated that underground nuclear testing operations were conducted in compliance with regulations, i.e., the dose the maximally exposed offsite individual could have received was less than 0.15 percent of the guideline for air exposure. All 1992 nuclear events took place during the first three quarters of the calendar year prior to the Congressional testing moratorium. All discharges of radioactive liquids remained onsite in containment ponds, and there was no indication of potential migration of radioactivity to the offsite area through groundwater. Surveillance around the NTS indicated that airborne radioactivity from test operations was not detectable offsite, and no measurable net exposure to members of the offsite population was detected through the offsite dosimetry program. Using the CAP88-PC model and NTS radionuclide emissions data, the calculated maximum effective dose equivalent offsite would have been 0.012 mrem. Any person receiving this dose was also exposed to 78 mrem from natural background radiation. There were no nonradiological releases to the offsite area. Hazardous wastes were shipped to EPA-approved disposal facilities. Compliance with the various regulations stemming from the National Environmental Policy Act is being achieved and, where mandated, permits for air and water discharges and waste management have been obtained from the appropriate agencies. Non-NTS support facilities complied with the requirements of air quality permits and state or local wastewater discharge and hazardous waste permits.

Black, S.C.; Latham, A.R.; Townsend, Y.E. [eds.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

& Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance

431

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: High Compression Ratio Turbo Gasoline Engine Operation Using Alcohol Enhancement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation given by Massachusetts Institute of Technology at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about high...

432

Report on Inspection of an Intelligence Work-For-Others Project at the Idaho Operations Office, IG-0367  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REPORT ON INSPECTION OF AN INTELLIGENCE WORK-FOR-OTHERS PROJECT AT THE IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE The Office of Inspections wants to make the distribution of its inspection reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, we are making this report available electronically through the Internet at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov Department of Energy Headquarters Anonymous FTP vml.hqadmin.doe.gov We are experimenting with various options to facilitate audit report distribution. Your comments would be appreciated and can be provided on the Customer Comment Form attached to the

433

Nuclear batteries  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Nuclear batteries ... Describes the structure, operation, and application of nuclear batteries. ... Nuclear / Radiochemistry ...

Alfred B. Garrett

1956-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Global Nuclear Energy Initiative at LBNL | U.S. DOE Office of...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Global Nuclear Energy Initiative at LBNL Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Applications of Nuclear Science Applications of...

435

Independent Oversight Review, Sandia Site Office - January 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sandia Site Office - January 2013 Sandia Site Office - January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Sandia Site Office - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Sandia Site Office (SSO) quality assurance (QA) assessment of the Manzano nuclear operations. The focus of the review, performed on site November 14-15, 2012, was to shadow SSO's QA assessment and evaluate its performance of compliance oversight of Sandia Corporation safety management programs (SMPs) at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) hazard-categorized nuclear facilities per SSO procedure

436

Independent Oversight Review, Sandia Site Office - January 2013 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sandia Site Office - January 2013 Sandia Site Office - January 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Sandia Site Office - January 2013 January 2013 Review of the Sandia Site Office Quality Assurance Assessment of the Manzano Nuclear Operations The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Sandia Site Office (SSO) quality assurance (QA) assessment of the Manzano nuclear operations. The focus of the review, performed on site November 14-15, 2012, was to shadow SSO's QA assessment and evaluate its performance of compliance oversight of Sandia Corporation safety management programs (SMPs) at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) hazard-categorized nuclear facilities per SSO procedure

437

FY94 Office of Technology Development Mixed Waste Operations Robotics Demonstration  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Technology Development (OTD) develops technologies to help solve waste management and environmental problems at DOE sites. The OTD includes the Robotics Technology Development Program (RTDP) and the Mixed Waste Integrated Program (MWIP). Together these programs will provide technologies for DOE mixed waste cleanup projects. Mixed waste contains both radioactive and hazardous constituents. DOE sites currently store over 240,000 cubic meters of low level mixed waste and cleanup activities will generate several hundred thousand more cubic meters. Federal and state regulations require that this waste must be processed before final disposal. The OTD RTDP Mixed Waste Operations (MWO) team held several robotic demonstrations at the Savannah River Site (SRS) during November of 1993. Over 330 representatives from DOE, Government Contractors, industry, and universities attended. The MWO team includes: Fernald Environmental Management Project (FEMP), Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Oak Ridge National Engineering Laboratory (ORNL), Sandia National Laboratory (SNL), and Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC). SRTC is the lead site for MWO and provides the technical coordinator. The primary demonstration objective was to show that robotic technologies can make DOE waste facilities run better, faster, more cost effective, and safer. To meet the primary objective, the demonstrations successfully showed the following remote waste drum processing activities: non-destructive drum examination, drum transportation, drum opening, removing waste from a drum, characterize and sort waste items, scarify metal waste, and inspect stored drums. To further meet the primary objective, the demonstrations successfully showed the following remote waste box processing activities: swing free crane control, workcell modeling, and torch standoff control.

Kriikku, E.M.

1994-08-30T23:59:59.000Z

438

KCP operations began 65 years ago today | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Corporation signed a prime contract to operate the Kansas City Plant for the Atomic Energy Commission. Today, the Kansas City Plant is celebrating 65 years of delivering on...

439

The LPMS-V installation and operational experience at Arkansas nuclear one  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes a new replacement system for the existing vibrations and loose parts monitoring system for the Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) units 1 and 2, in Russellville, Arkansas. The installation and operational history are also discussed.

Lexa, A.F. [Babcock and Wilcox Company, Lynchburg, VA (United States)]: Hudson, E. [Entergy Operations, Inc., Russelville, AR (United States)

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

440

Nuclear criticality safety evaluation of Spray Booth Operations in X-705, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report evaluates nuclear criticality safety for Spray Booth Operations in the Decontamination and Recovery Facility, X-705, at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. A general description of current procedures and related hardware/equipment is presented. Control parameters relevant to nuclear criticality safety are explained, and a consolidated listing of administrative controls and safety systems is developed. Based on compliance with DOE Orders and MMES practices, the overall operation is evaluated, and recommendations for enhanced safety are suggested.

Sheaffer, M.K.; Keeton, S.C.

1993-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Enhanced Operation Strategies for Air-Conditioning and Lighting Systems Toward Peak Power Reduction for an Office Building in Kuwait  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Enhanced?Operation?Strategies?for?Air? Conditioning?and?Lighting? Systems?Toward?Peak?Power?Reduction? for?an?Office?Building?in?Kuwait F. Alghimlas A. Al-Mulla G.P. Maheshwari D. Al-Nakib Building and Energy Technologies Department... Environment and Urban Development Division ICEBO 2012 Manchester, United Kingdom October 23-26, 2012 Electricity?Use?by?Sector?in?Kuwait Percentages?of?Primary?Energy?Utilization Percentages?of?Electricity?Utilization Yearly?Increase?in...

Alghimlas, F.; Al-Mulla, A.; Maheshwari, G.P.; Al-Nakib, D.

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

Nuclear Safety Research and Development Annual Report, December 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is the first annual report of DOEs Nuclear Safety Research and Development (NSR&D) Program, managed by the Office of Nuclear Safety in the Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security. The report includes a description of the program and summaries of R&D projects related to DOE (including NNSA) nuclear facility and operational safety.

443

Nuclear Wallet Cards at BNL | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26Germantown Building 1000 Independence...

444

Nuclear Reaction Cross Sections Database at BNL | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26Germantown Building 1000 Independence...

445

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

446

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

447

Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety and Security Safety and Security Report to the Secretary on the Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1 February 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security HSS Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Department-wide Action Plan for the Columbia Accident and Davis-Besse Event ........... 3 3.0 Comprehensive Operating Experience Program ................................................................. 5

448

Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety and Security Safety and Security Report to the Secretary on the Status and Effectiveness of DOE Efforts to Learn from Internal and External Operating Experience in Accordance with Commitment #20 of the DOE Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1 February 2011 Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security HSS Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Department-wide Action Plan for the Columbia Accident and Davis-Besse Event ........... 3 3.0 Comprehensive Operating Experience Program ................................................................. 5

449

Transition Operators Entering Neutrinoles Double Electron Capture to Excited Nuclear States  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We construct the effective transition operators relevant for neutrinoless double electron capture leading to final nuclear states different than $0^{+}$. From the structure of these operators we see that, if such a process is observed experimentally, it will be very helpful in singling out the very important light neutrino mass contribution from the other lepton violating mechanisms

J. D. Vergados

2011-08-02T23:59:59.000Z

450

US Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office annual site environmental report: 1993. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Monitoring and surveillance on and around the Nevada Test Site (NTS) by DOE contractors and NTS user organizations during 1993 indicated that operations on the NTS were conducted in compliance with applicable federal and DOE guidelines, i.e., the dose the maximally exposed offsite individual could have received was less than 0.04 percent of the 10 mrem per year guide for air exposure. No nuclear tests were conducted due to the moratorium. All discharges of radioactive liquids remained onsite in containment ponds, and there was no indication of potential migration of radioactivity to the offsite area through groundwater. Surveillance around the NTS indicated that airborne radioactivity from diffusion, evaporation of effluents, or resuspension was not detectable offsite, and no measurable net exposure to members of the offsite population was detected through the offsite dosimetry program. Using the CAP88-PC model and NTS radionuclide emissions data, the calculated effective dose equivalent to the maximally exposed individual offsite would have been 0.004 mrem. Any person receiving this dose would also have received 97 mrem from natural background radiation. There were no nonradiological releases to the offsite area. Hazardous wastes were shipped offsite to approved disposal facilities. Compliance with the various regulations stemming from the National Environmental Policy Act is being achieved and, where mandated, permits for air and water discharges and waste management have been obtained from the appropriate agencies. Support facilities at off-NTS locations compiled with the requirements of air quality permits and state or local wastewater discharge and hazardous waste permits.

Black, S.C.; Glines, W.M.; Townsend, Y.E. [eds.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

Work for the DOE Office of Power Technology - Nuclear Engineering Division  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of Power of Power Technology Capabilities Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Overview Energy System Applications Overview DOE Office of Fossil Energy DOE Office of Transportation Technologies Ion-mobility Spectrometry Based NOx Sensor DOE Office of Power Technology Work for Others Safety-Related Applications Homeland Security Applications Biomedical Applications Millimiter Wave Group Papers Other NPNS Capabilities Work with Argonne Contact us For Employees Site Map Help Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter NE on Flickr Sensors and Instrumentation and Nondestructive Evaluation Energy System Applications Bookmark and Share DOE Office of Power Technology NDE for Ceramics in Microturbines The concept of distributed energy systems using small gas turbines (< 500

452

An analysis of nuclear power plant operating costs: A 1995 update  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Over the years real (inflation-adjusted) O&M cost have begun to level off. The objective of this report is to determine whether the industry and NRC initiatives to control costs have resulted in this moderation in the growth of O&M costs. Because the industry agrees that the control of O&M costs is crucial to the viability of the technology, an examination of the factors causing the moderation in costs is important. A related issue deals with projecting nuclear operating costs into the future. Because of the escalation in nuclear operating costs (and the fall in fossil fuel prices) many State and Federal regulatory commissions are examining the economics of the continued operation of nuclear power plants under their jurisdiction. The economics of the continued operation of a nuclear power plant is typically examined by comparing the cost of the plants continued operation with the cost of obtaining the power from other sources. This assessment requires plant-specific projections of nuclear operating costs. Analysts preparing these projections look at past industry-wide cost trends and consider whether these trends are likely to continue. To determine whether these changes in trends will continue into the future, information about the causal factors influencing costs and the future trends in these factors are needed. An analysis of the factors explaining the moderation in cost growth will also yield important insights into the question of whether these trends will continue.

NONE

1995-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

453

Contact Us | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

The National Nuclear Security Administration The National Nuclear Security Administration Contact Us Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Sandia Field Office > Contact Us Contact Us If you have questions about activities at the Sandia Field Office, please contact the SFO Public Affairs Director at (505) 845-5264. Our mailing address is: U. S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Sandia Field Office, P.O. Box 5400, Albuquerque, NM 87185. Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr General Information About SFO Contact Us Contract Administration & Business Management Emergency Information Facilities & Projects Nuclear Operations Environment, Safety & Health Public Affairs Safeguards & Security Performance and Quality Assurance

454

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

APP-005 APP-005 Planning for and Measuring Office of Inspector General Results FY 2002 Annual Performance Report and FY 2003 Annual Performance Plan Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Energy Inspector General's Message We are pleased to present the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) consolidated Fiscal Year 2002 Annual Performance Report and Fiscal Year 2003 Annual Performance Plan. This document evaluates our actual Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 performance and establishes the performance goals and strategies we will pursue in FY 2003 to fulfill our mission. As mandated by the Inspector General Act, the OIG promotes the effective, efficient, and economical operation of the Department of Energy's programs and operations, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

455

National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration Finding of No Significant Impact for the Construction and Operation of a New Office Building and Related Structures within TA-3 at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico U. S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th Street Los Alamos, N M 8 7 5 4 4 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECUIRTY ADMINISTRATION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT INIPACT Construction and Operation of a New Office Building and Related Structures withinTA-3 at Los Alarnos National Laboratory, Los Alamos. New Mexico FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Environmental Assessment (EA) for Construction and Operation of a New Office Building and Related Structures within TA-3 at L os Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (DOE/EA- 7 375)

456

Office of Legal Counsel U.S. Department of Justice *1 GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS IN THE EVENT OF A  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

95 WL 17216091 (O.L.C.) 95 WL 17216091 (O.L.C.) (Preliminary Print) Office of Legal Counsel U.S. Department of Justice *1 GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS IN THE EVENT OF A LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS August 16, 1995 A government agency may employ personal services in advance of appropriations only when there is a reasonable and articulable connection between the function to be performed and the safety of human life or the protection of property, and when there is some reasonable likelihood that either or both would be compromised in some significant degree by the delay in the performance of the function in question. MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET This memorandum responds to your request to the Attorney General for advice regarding the permissible scope of

457

Audit of Electrical System Construction Projects at the Nevada Operations Office, WR-B-97-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AT THE NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost-effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the following alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov Department of Energy Headquarters Anonymous FTP vm1.hqadmin.doe.gov Department of Energy Human Resources and Administration Home Page http://www.hr.doe.gov/refshelf.html Your comments would be appreciated and can be provided on the Customer Response form attached to the report. This report can be obtained from the U.S. Department of Energy

458

Project Execution Plan, Waste Management Division, Nevada Operations Office, U.S. Department of Energy, April 2000  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This plan addresses project activities encompassed by the U.S. Department of Energy/Nevada Operations Office Waste Management Division and conforms to the requirements contained in the ''Life Cycle Asset Management,'' U.S. Department of Energy Order O430.1A; the Joint Program Office Policy on Project Management in Support of DOE Order O430.1, and the Project Execution and Engineering Management Planning Guide. The plan also reflects the milestone philosophies of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, as agreed to by the state of Nevada; and traditional project management philosophies such as the development of life cycle costs, schedules, and work scope; identification of roles and responsibilities; and baseline management and controls.

DOE /NV

2000-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

Continuous Energy Management of the HVAC&R System in an Office Building System Operation and Energy Consumption for the Eight Years after Building Completion  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The authors continuously studied the energy consumption of a heating, ventilating, air- conditioning and refrigerating (HVAC&R) system in an office for the operation of the system in terms of its expected performance. A fault in the system control...

Akashi, Y.; Shinozaki, M.; Kusuda, R.; Ito, S.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

460

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operations office nuclear" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preiminary Documented Safety Analysis Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 HIAR-LANL-2013-04-08 Site: Los Alamos National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Coordination Meeting with National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Field Office Safety Basis Review Team Leader for Transuranic Waste Facility Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis Report Dates of Activity : 04/08/13 Report Preparer: James O. Low Activity Description/Purpose: The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) staff visited the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to coordinate with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Los Alamos Field Office (NA-00-LA) Safety Basis Review Team (SBRT) Leader for review of the revised preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA) for the Transuranic Waste

462

SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

SC Systems SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Business Policy and Operations (BPO) BPO Home Leadership Organization Chart .pdf file (195KB) Business Management and Planning (BMP) Division SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Contact Information Business Policy & Operations U.S. Department of Energy SC-45/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-0192 F: (301) 903-2481 More Information » SC Systems and Operations (SCSO) Division Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The SC Systems and Operations Division (SCSO) provides support for the SC HQ users in the areas of operations and maintenance for SC's network infrastructure, operational applications, cyber security, Science web sites and portals, COOP/ disaster recovery, IT property and asset management, and

463

Human-centered HMI design to support cognitive process of operators in nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In this study, an operation advisory system to aid cognitive process of operators is proposed for advanced main control rooms (MCRs) in future nuclear power plants (NPPs). As MCRs are fully digitalized and designed based on computer technologies, MCRs have much evolved by improving human-machine interface (HMI) design and by adapting automation or support systems for helping operator's convenient operation and maintenance. Various kinds of support systems for operators are developed or developing for advanced MCRs. The proposed system is suggesting a design basis about 'What kinds of support systems are most efficient and necessary for MCR operators ' and 'how to use them together.' In this paper, the operator's operation processes are analyzed based on a human cognitive process model and appropriate support systems that support each activity of the human cognitive process are suggested. Also, the proposed support system is evaluated using Bayesian belief network model and human error probabilities in order to estimate its effect. (authors)

Lee, S. J.; Seong, P. H. [Dept. of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Inst. of Science and Technology, 373-1, Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-701 (Korea, Republic of)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Savannah River Operations Office P.O. Box A Aiken, South Carolina...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

South Carolina 29802 BUSINESS SENSITIVE OEC 1 0 tuu9 Mr. Garry Flowen, President &. CEO Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC Building 730- I a, Room 333 Aiken. SC 29808 Dear Mr....

465

Applications of neural networks to monitoring and decision making in the operation of nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Application of neural networks to monitoring and decision making in the operation of nuclear power plants is being investigated under a US Department of Energy sponsored program at the University of Tennessee. Projects include the feasibility of using neural networks for the following tasks: (1) diagnosing specific abnormal conditions or problems in nuclear power plants, (2) detection of the change of mode of operation of the plant, (3) validating signals coming from detectors, (4) review of noise'' data from TVA's Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant, and (5) examination of the NRC's database of Letter Event Reports'' for correlation of sequences of events in the reported incidents. Each of these projects and its status are described briefly in this paper. This broad based program has as its objective the definition of the state-of-the-art in using neural networks to enhance the performance of commercial nuclear power plants.

Uhrig, R.E. (Tennessee Univ., Knoxville, TN (United States) Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States))

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Operator support for ageing nuclear critical infrastructure systems: integrating ecological interface design with prospect theory  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Operator support is essential for making decisions involving ageing infrastructure. In particular, ageing plants may have deviated from their original condition into a new state with a less predictable set of possible actions and outcomes. Standard procedures and practices may be insufficient to handle the risks and vulnerabilities of ageing nuclear infrastructure. Operator support must be designed with an understanding of how operators make decisions under uncertainty and a view to supporting unexpected situations. Prospect theory (PT) and ecological interface design (EID) are proposed as two complementary approaches for guiding operator support. PT describes how people make decisions under uncertainty and EID is an interface design approach for aiding operators with the problem-solving process in unanticipated situations. We suggest that these two approaches can be integrated to improve complex decision making in ageing nuclear plants.

Catherine Burns; Ali Asgary; Jason K. Levy

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

Multi-unit Operations in Non-Nuclear Systems: Lessons Learned for Small Modular Reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The nuclear-power community has reached the stage of proposing advanced reactor designs to support power generation for decades to come. Small modular reactors (SMRs) are one approach to meet these energy needs. While the power output of individual reactor modules is relatively small, they can be grouped to produce reactor sites with different outputs. Also, they can be designed to generate hydrogen, or to process heat. Many characteristics of SMRs are quite different from those of current plants and may be operated quite differently. One difference is that multiple units may be operated by a single crew (or a single operator) from one control room. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is examining the human factors engineering (HFE) aspects of SMRs to support licensing reviews. While we reviewed information on SMR designs to obtain information, the designs are not completed and all of the design and operational information is not yet available. Nor is there information on multi-unit operations as envisioned for SMRs available in operating experience. Thus, to gain a better understanding of multi-unit operations we sought the lesson learned from non-nuclear systems that have experience in multi-unit operations, specifically refineries, unmanned aerial vehicles and tele-intensive care units. In this paper we report the lessons learned from these systems and the implications for SMRs.

OHara J. M.; Higgins, J.; DAgostino, A.

2012-01-17T23:59:59.000Z

468

Nuclear Wallet Cards at BNL | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Wallet Cards at BNL Wallet Cards at BNL Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Spinoff Applications Spinoff Archives SBIR/STTR Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Spinoff Archives Nuclear Wallet Cards at BNL Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application/instrumentation: Nuclear Wallet Cards Developed at: National Nuclear Data Center, BNL Developed in: 2000-current Result of NP research: DOE-NP nuclear data program Application currently being supported by:

469

Improved Design of Nuclear Reactor Control System | U.S. DOE Office of  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Improved Design of Nuclear Reactor Improved Design of Nuclear Reactor Control System Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Spinoff Applications Spinoff Archives SBIR/STTR Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Spinoff Archives Improved Design of Nuclear Reactor Control System Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application/instrumentation: Improved Design of Nuclear Reactor Control System Developed at: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility (HRIBF)

470

Global Nuclear Energy Initiative at LBNL | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Global Nuclear Energy Initiative at Global Nuclear Energy Initiative at LBNL Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Spinoff Applications Spinoff Archives SBIR/STTR Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Spinoff Archives Global Nuclear Energy Initiative at LBNL Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Application/instrumentation: Global nuclear energy initiative Developed at: 88-inch Cyclotron, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Developed in:

471

Nuclear Physics Related Brochures | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Nuclear Physics Related Brochures and Videos Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources NP Workforce Survey Results .pdf file (258KB) Links Databases Workshop Reports Nuclear Physics Related Brochures and Videos Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » News & Resources Nuclear Physics Related Brochures and Videos Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Brochures Accelerating Innovation NP Highlights Image Accelerating Innovation (2011) .pdf file (1.2MB): How nuclear physics benefits us all

472

Audit Report National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Weapons Systems Configuration Management DOEIG-0902 March 2014 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of...

473

Emergency Information | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Information | National Nuclear Security Administration Information | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Emergency Information Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Sandia Field Office > Emergency Information Emergency Information The Sandia Field Office (SFO) Emergency Management System is designed to

474

Aging of nuclear station diesel generators: Evaluation of operating and expert experience: Workshop  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) evaluated operational and expert experience pertaining to the aging degradation of diesel generators in nuclear service. The research, sponsored by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), identified and characterized the contribution of aging to emergency diesel generator failures. This report, Volume II, reports the results of an industry-wide workshop held on May 28 and 29, 1986, to discuss the technical issues associated with aging of nuclear service emergency diesel generators. The technical issues discussed most extensively were: man/machine interfaces, component interfaces, thermal gradients of startup and cooldown and the need for an accurate industry database for trend analysis of the diesel generator system.

Hoopingarner, K.R.; Vause, J.W.

1987-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

475

Sustainable Forward Operating Base Nuclear Power Evaluation (Relationship Mapping System) Users Manual  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Sustainable Forward Operating Base (FOB) Nuclear Power Evaluation was developed by the Idaho National Laboratory Systems Engineering Department to support the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in assessing and demonstrating the viability of deploying small-scale reactors in support of military operations in theatre. This document provides a brief explanation of how to access and use the Sustainable FOB Nuclear Power Evaluation utility to view assessment results as input into developing and integrating the program elements needed to create a successful demonstration.

Not Listed

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

An adaptive simulation model for analysis of nuclear material shipping operations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Los Alamos has developed an advanced simulation environment designed specifically for nuclear materials operations. This process-level simulation package, the Process Modeling System (ProMoS), is based on high-fidelity material balance criteria and contains intrinsic mechanisms for waste and recycle flows, contaminant estimation and tracking, and material-constrained operations. Recent development efforts have focused on coupling complex personnel interactions, personnel exposure calculations, and stochastic process-personnel performance criteria to the material-balance simulation. This combination of capabilities allows for more realistic simulation of nuclear material handling operations where complex personnel interactions are required. They have used ProMoS to assess fissile material shipping performance characteristics at the Los Alamos National Laboratory plutonium facility (TA-55). Nuclear material shipping operations are ubiquitous in the DOE complex and require the largest suite of varied personnel interacting in a well-timed manner to accomplish the task. They have developed a baseline simulation of the present operations and have estimated the operational impacts and requirement of the pit production mission at TA-55 as a result of the SSM-PEIS. Potential bottlenecks have been explored and mechanisms for increasing operational efficiency are identified.

Boerigter, S.T.; Sena, D.J.; Fasel, J.H.

1998-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

477

Comparing cultural profiles of MCR operators with those of non-MCR operators working in domestic Nuclear Power Plants  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Operation experience of complex socio-technical systems such as Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) shows that most significant events are attributable to human error. Thus, various kinds of Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) techniques were used to manage human error for safety-critical tasks. However, a lack of available HRA data is a critical issue in conducting an HRA. For this reason, many researchers have tried to provide HRA data extracted from simulated emergency conditions. Unfortunately, it is still doubtful to directly use these HRA data because different operational cultures may result in different human performances even under a similar task context. From this concern, previous studies claimed that Main Control Room (MCR) operators working in different \\{NPPs\\} share very similar cultural profile. In order to confirm this claim, the culture profiles of operating personnel (i.e., non-MCR and MCR operators) working in domestic \\{NPPs\\} are compared. As a result, although some discrepancies are observed, it is positive to say that operating personnel of \\{NPPs\\} share similar cultural profiles to some extent. This result can be regarded as the first step to provide technical underpinnings that are helpful for understanding human performance data collected from different countries.

Jinkyun Park; Wondea Jung

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology| U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology Nuclear Physics (NP) NP Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of NP Spinoff Applications SBIR/STTR Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology Funding Opportunities Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) News & Resources Contact Information Nuclear Physics U.S. Department of Energy SC-26/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3613 F: (301) 903-3833 E: sc.np@science.doe.gov More Information » Benefits of NP Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Applications of Nuclear Science and Technology (ANS&T) Exchange Meeting: August 22-23, 2011 Hilton Washington DC/Rockville Hotel & Executive Meeting Center

479

U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, environmental data report for the Nevada Test Site -- 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5400.1, ``General Environmental Protection Program,`` establishes environmental protection program requirements, authorities, and responsibilities for DOE operations. These mandates require compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection regulations. During calendar year (CY) 1995 environmental protection and monitoring programs were conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and other DOE Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) managed sites in Nevada and across the United States. A detailed discussion of these environmental protection and monitoring programs, and summary data and assessments for environmental monitoring results at these sites in CY 1995 are provided in the DOE/NV, Annual Site Environmental Report--1995, (ASER) DOE/NV/11718-037. A brief description of the scope of this environmental monitoring is provided below, categorized by ``on-NTS`` and ``off-NTS`` monitoring.

Black, S.C.; Townsend, Y.E. [eds.; Kinnison, R.R.

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Theoretical uncertainties in the nuclear matrix elements of neutrinoless double beta decay: The transition operator  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

We explore the theoretical uncertainties related to the transition operator of neutrinoless double-beta (0???) decay. The transition operator used in standard calculations is a product of one-body currents, that can be obtained phenomenologically as in Tomoda [1] or imkovic et al. [2]. However, corrections to the operator are hard to obtain in the phenomenological approach. Instead, we calculate the 0??? decay operator in the framework of chiral effective theory (EFT), which gives a systematic order-by-order expansion of the transition currents. At leading orders in chiral EFT we reproduce the standard one-body currents of Refs. [1] and [2]. Corrections appear as two-body (2b) currents predicted by chiral EFT. We compute the effects of the leading 2b currents to the nuclear matrix elements of 0??? decay for several transition candidates. The 2b current contributions are related to the quenching of Gamow-Teller transitions found in nuclear structure calculations.

Menndez, Javier [Institut fr Kernphysik, Technische Universitt Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany and ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI, GSI Helmholtzzentrum fr Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt (Germany)

2013-12-30T23:59:59.000Z