Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

High level waste facilities -- Continuing operation or orderly shutdown  

SciTech Connect

Two options for Environmental Impact Statement No action alternatives describe operation of the radioactive liquid waste facilities at the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. The first alternative describes continued operation of all facilities as planned and budgeted through 2020. Institutional control for 100 years would follow shutdown of operational facilities. Alternatively, the facilities would be shut down in an orderly fashion without completing planned activities. The facilities and associated operations are described. Remaining sodium bearing liquid waste will be converted to solid calcine in the New Waste Calcining Facility (NWCF) or will be left in the waste tanks. The calcine solids will be stored in the existing Calcine Solids Storage Facilities (CSSF). Regulatory and cost impacts are discussed.

Decker, L.A.

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

2

Cycling, Startup, Shutdown, and Layup Fossil Plant Cycle Chemistry Guidelines for Operators and Chemists  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purity of water and steam is central to ensuring fossil plant component availability and reliability. Complete optimization of cycle chemistry requires protection of the steam-water cycle during the shutdown, layup, and startup phases of operation. These guidelines will assist utilities in developing cycle chemistry guidelines for all transient operations and shutdowns.

2009-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

3

Development of Standardized Probabilistic Risk Assessment Models for Shutdown Operations Integrated in SPAR Level 1 Model  

SciTech Connect

Nuclear plant operating experience and several studies show that the risk from shutdown operation during Modes 4, 5, and 6 at pressurized water reactors and Modes 4 and 5 at boiling water reactors can be significant. This paper describes using the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s full-power Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) model as the starting point for development of risk evaluation models for commercial nuclear power plants. The shutdown models are integrated with their respective internal event at-power SPAR model. This is accomplished by combining the modified system fault trees from the SPAR full-power model with shutdown event tree logic. Preliminary human reliability analysis results indicate that risk is dominated by the operator’s ability to correctly diagnose events and initiate systems.

S. T. Khericha; J. Mitman

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

4

Shutdown and low-power operation at commercial nuclear power plants in the United States. Final report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The report contains the results of the NRC Staff`s evaluation of shutdown and low-power operations at US commercial nuclear power plants. The report describes studies conducted by the staff in the following areas: Operating experience related to shutdown and low-power operations, probabilistic risk assessment of shutdown and low-power conditions and utility programs for planning and conducting activities during periods the plant is shut down. The report also documents evaluations of a number of technical issues regarding shutdown and low-power operations performed by the staff, including the principal findings and conclusions. Potential new regulatory requirements are discussed, as well as potential changes in NRC programs. A draft report was issued for comment in February 1992. This report is the final version and includes the responses to the comments along with the staff regulatory analysis of potential new requirements.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

5

Risk contribution from low power, shutdown, and other operational modes beyond full power  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During 1989 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to carefully examine the potential risks during low power and shutdown operations. Two plants, Surry (a pressurized water reactor) and Grand Gulf (a boiling water reactor), were selected for study by Brookhaven National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, respectively. The program objectives included assessing the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power and comparing estimated core damage frequencies, important accident sequences, and other qualitative and quantitative results with full power accidents as assessed in NUREG-1150. The scope included a Level 3 probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for traditional internal events and a Level 1 PRA on fire, flooding, and seismically induced core damage sequences. A phased approach was used in Level 1. In Phase 1 the concept of plant operational states (POSs) was developed to provide a better representation of the plant as it transitions from power to nonpower operation. This included a coarse screening analysis of all POSs to identify vulnerable plant configurations, to characterize (on a high, medium, or low basis) potential frequencies of core damage accidents, and to provide a foundation for a detailed Phase 2 analysis. In Phase 2, selected POSs from both Grand Gulf and Surry were chosen for detailed analysis. For Grand Gulf, POS 5 (approximately cold shutdown as defined by Grand Gulf Technical Specifications) during a refueling outage was selected. For Surry, three POSs representing the time the plant spends in midloop operation were chosen for analysis. These included POS 6 and POS 10 of a refueling outage and POS 6 of a drained maintenance outage. Level 1 and Level 2/3 results from both the Surry and Grand Gulf analyses are presented.

Whitehead, D.W.; Brown, T.D.; Chu, T.L.; Pratt, W.T.

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

6

Shutdown Margin for High Conversion BWRs Operating in Th-233U Fuel Cycle  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Several reactivity control system design options are explored in order to satisfy shutdown margin (SDM) requirements in a high conversion BWRs operating in Th-233U fuel cycle (Th-RBWR). The studied has an axially heterogeneous fuel assembly structure with a single fissile zone sandwiched between two fertile blanket zones. The utilization of an originally suggested RBWR Y-shape control rod in Th-RBWR is shown to be insufficient for maintaining adequate SDM to balance the high negative reactivity feedbacks, while maintaining fuel breeding potential, core power rating, and minimum Critical Power Ratio (CPR). Instead, an alternative assembly design, also relying on heterogeneous fuel zoning, is proposed for achieving fissile inventory ratio (FIR) above unity, adequate SDM and meeting minimum CPR limit at thermal core output matching the ABWR power. The new concept was modeled as a single 3-dimensional fuel assembly having reflective radial boundaries, using the BGCore system, which consists of the MCNP code coupled with fuel depletion and thermo-hydraulic feedback modules.

Yaniv Shaposhnik; Eugene Shwageraus; Ezra Elias

2013-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

7

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-45 3-45 DATE: April 16, 2013 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 15.1 Source Selection Guide SUMMARY: Attached is a revised Source Selection Guide. The Guide has been updated to reflect changes to DOE policies and practices and includes new topics such as Flow of the Source Selection Process, Source Selection Official Designation, Confidentiality and Conflict of Interest Certificates, Source Selection Training and Roles and Responsibilities. This Flash and its attachments will be available online within a day, at the following website: http://energy.gov/management/office-management/operational-

8

Date  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

award of the (Date) ENERGY STAR: Plant name Plant street address Plant city, state, zip code As documented by the attached Statement of Energy Performance, I affirm that the...

9

Dates  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dates Dates Nature Bulletin No. 511-A December 15, 1973 Forest Preserve District of Cook County George W. Dunne, President Roland F. Eisenbeis, Supt. of Conservation DATES When the wise men from the east, guided by a mysterious new star, traveled to Jerusalem and thence to Bethlehem where they worshipped the infant Jesus and presented Him with gifts, you can be sure that, in addition to gold and frankincense and myrrh, they carried dates as food to sustain them on their long journey. The Date Palm had been cultivated along the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers since the time of the Sumerians, 3000 years before the birth of Christ. This tree, like the coconut palm, is unknown today in its wild state but is believed to have originated in Ethiopia. In early times it was abundant in Palestine and the scientific name, Phoenix, given to the date palm by the Greeks, may be due to the fact that they first saw it in Phoenicia. The "tree of life, " variously referred to in the Bible, was probably this palm.

10

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE: DATE: AUG 12 1991 REPLY TO ATTN OF: EM-421 (J. Wagoner, 3-8147) SUBIECT: Elimination of the Duriron Company Site TO: The File I have reviewed the attached site summary and elimination recommendation for the Duriron Company Site in Dayton, Ohio. I have determined that there is little likelihood of radioactive contamination at this site. Based on the above, the Ouriron Company Site is hereby eliminated from further consideration under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. W. Ale~ander~illiams,~PhD Designation and Certification Manager Off-Site Branch Division of Eastern Area Programs Office of Environmental Restoration Attachment -: bee: Weston EM-40 (2) P. Hevner Review: - OTS NOTE DATE: July 15, 1991 TO: Alexander WiTliams FROM: Dan Stou tF

11

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 DATE: April 25, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) - Public Access SUMMARY: On April 15, 2011, the public side of the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) website was launched. This means that information posted to FAPIIS on and after this date, with the exception of past performance reviews, will be accessible by the public. Public access to information posted to FAPIIS prior to April 15, 2011, will be subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process. (See paragraph (b)(3) of

12

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

-RL5- DATE: September 13, 1990 TO: Alexander Williams (w 39 fusrap6 I FROM: Ed Mitchellzm SUBJECT: Elimination Recommendation for American Machine and Foundry in New York City The purpose of this note is to provide the following with respect to the former American Machine and Foundry Company (AMF) in New York City, New York--FUSRAP Considered Site Recommendation (g/13/90). 1 he recommendation is to eliminate the AMF New York City sites. If you agree, then please return an "approved" and dated copy of this note. Upon receipt of it, we will update the Considered-Sites Data Base for FUSRAP of DOE's intent to eliminate the site. Please call me at 353-1281 if you have +ny questions. cc: J. Wagoner D. Tonkay file FUSRAP NY.59 -------------------------------~---------------------------

13

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 DATE: May 12, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter AL 2011-05/Financial Acquisition Letter FAL 2011-01 Congressional Notification of Pending Award of a Contract Action, Announcement of Selected Applications for Negotiation of Financial Assistance Awards, or to Award a Financial Assistance Action in excess of $1 Million SUMMARY: AL 2011-05/FAL 2011-01 (AL/FAL) implements statutory and non-statutory Congressional notification of pending award of a contract action, announcement of selected applications for negotiation of financial assistance awards, or to award a financial assistance

14

Date  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2009 3, 2009 Tim Meeks, Administrator Western Area Power Administration P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228-8213 Dear Administrator Meeks: East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (East River) offers this letter as comment to the Western Area Power Administration's (Western) Federal Register Notice (FRN), (dated March 4, 2009, pp.9392-9393) concerning implementation of Western's new transmission loan or construction authority. East River is a wholesale electric power supply cooperative which provides twenty rural electric cooperatives and one municipal electric system transmission and power supply services. These twenty-one non-profit retail electric providers, which collectively own East River, serve about 90,000 residential, commercial

15

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry, Unit 1: Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events during mid-loop operations, Appendices A--D. Volume 2, Part 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During 1989, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to carefully examine the Potential risks during low Power and shutdown operations. The program includes two parallel projects being performed by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Two plants, Surry (pressurized water reactor) and Grand Gulf (boiling water reactor), were selected as the Plants to be studied. The objectives of the program are to assess the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power operation and to compare the estimated core damage frequencies, important accident sequences and other qualitative and quantitative results with those accidents initiated during full power operation as assessed in NUREG-1150. The objective of this report is to document the approach utilized in the Surry plant and discuss the results obtained. A parallel report for the Grand Gulf plant is prepared by SNL. This study shows that the core-damage frequency during mid-loop operation at the Surry plant is comparable to that of power operation. We recognize that there is very large uncertainty in the human error probabilities in this study. This study identified that only a few procedures are available for mitigating accidents that may occur during shutdown. Procedures written specifically for shutdown accidents would be useful. This document, Volume 2, Pt. 2 provides appendices A through D of this report.

Chu, T.L.; Musicki, Z.; Kohut, P. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)] [and others

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry, Unit 1: Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events during mid-loop operations, Appendices E (Sections E.1--E.8). Volume 2, Part 3A  

SciTech Connect

During 1989, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to carefully examine the potential risks during low power and shutdown operations. The program includes two parallel projects being performed by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Two plants, Surry (pressurized water reactor) and Grand Gulf (boiling water reactor), were selected as the plants to be studied. The objectives of the program are to assess the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power operation and to compare the estimated core damage frequencies, important accident sequences and other qualitative and quantitative results with those accidents initiated during full power operation as assessed in NUREG-1150. The objective of this report is to document the approach utilized in the Surry plant and discuss the results obtained. A parallel report for the Grand Gulf plant is prepared by SNL. This study shows that the core-damage frequency during mid-loop operation at the Surry plant is comparable to that of power operation. The authors recognize that there is very large uncertainty in the human error probabilities in this study. This study identified that only a few procedures are available for mitigating accidents that may occur during shutdown. Procedures written specifically for shutdown accidents would be useful.

Chu, T.L.; Musicki, Z.; Kohut, P. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)] [and others

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

16 SECTION A. Project Title: GaRDS Vehicle X-Ray System Procurement, Installation and Operations SECTION B. Project Description: . This effort will be to procure, install, and...

18

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Grand Gulf, Unit 1: Evaluation of severe accident risks for plant operational state 5 during a refueling outage. Main report and appendices, Volume 6, Part 1  

SciTech Connect

Traditionally, probabilistic risk assessments (PRAS) of severe accidents in nuclear power plants have considered initiating events potentially occurring only during full power operation. Recent studies and operational experience have, however, implied that accidents during low power and shutdown could be significant contributors to risk. In response to this concern, in 1989 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to carefully examine the potential risks during low power and shutdown operations. Two plants, Surry (pressurized water reactor) and Grand Gulf (boiling water reactor), were selected as the plants to be studied. The program consists of two parallel projects being performed by Brookhaven National Laboratory (Surry) and Sandia National Laboratories (Grand Gulf). The program objectives include assessing the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power operation and comparing the estimated risks with the risk associated with accidents initiated during full power operation as assessed in NUREG-1150. The scope of the program is that of a Level-3 PRA. The subject of this report is the PRA of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The Grand Gulf plant utilizes a 3833 MWt BUR-6 boiling water reactor housed in a Mark III containment. The Grand Gulf plant is located near Port Gibson, Mississippi. The regime of shutdown analyzed in this study was plant operational state (POS) 5 during a refueling outage, which is approximately Cold Shutdown as defined by Grand Gulf Technical Specifications. The entire PRA of POS 5 is documented in a multi-volume NUREG report (NUREG/CR-6143). The internal events accident sequence analysis (Level 1) is documented in Volume 2. The Level 1 internal fire and internal flood analyses are documented in Vols 3 and 4, respectively.

Brown, T.D.; Kmetyk, L.N.; Whitehead, D.; Miller, L. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Forester, J. [Science Applications International Corp., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Johnson, J. [GRAM, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

53 53 DATE: May 15, 2013 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6 SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2013-06 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2013-04 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6. The AL addresses the following: Appropriations Act Section 301(a) Unfunded Requests for Proposals

20

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POLICY FLASH 2013-12 POLICY FLASH 2013-12 DATE: December 7, 2012 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: Section 301(b) Congressional Notification of Multi-year Contract Award Report Revision for Fiscal Year 2013 SUMMARY: With reference to Acquisition Letter (AL) 2012-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2012-02 regarding Section 301(b) Congressional Notification of Multi-year Contract Award, the spreadsheet is revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 reporting. The revised spreadsheet will now have 5 funding columns that must be filled in for each 301(b) notification instead of 4 columns. The amounts in columns I through L should equal to the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 SECTION A. Project Title: Smoking Shelters SECTION B. Project Description. Install up to three prefabricated outdoor shelters for smokers. Design and install a shelter base so that shelters can be movable. The base shall be designed to prevent shelters from moving or tipping over due to high winds. Specific location for shelters is to be determined, but the shelter bases will be placed atop existing concrete or asphalt such that no subsurface soil disturbance is expected. SECTION C. Environmental Aspects / Potential Sources of Impact none SECTION D. Determine the Level of Environmental Review (or Documentation) and Reference(s): Identify the applicable categorical exclusion from 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B, give the appropriate justification, and the approval date..

22

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-09-002 SECTION A. Project Title: Smoking Shelters SECTION B. Project Description. Install up to three prefabricated outdoor shelters for smokers. Design and install a shelter base so that shelters can be movable. The base shall be designed to prevent shelters from moving or tipping over due to high winds. Specific location for shelters is to be determined, but the shelter bases will be placed atop existing concrete or asphalt such that no subsurface soil disturbance is expected. SECTION C. Environmental Aspects / Potential Sources of Impact none SECTION D. Determine the Level of Environmental Review (or Documentation) and Reference(s): Identify the applicable categorical exclusion from 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B, give the appropriate justification, and the approval date..

23

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 61 DATE: June 19, 2013 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Acquisition and Project Management SUBJECT: The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 and How It Affects Federal Employee Non-Disclosure Policies, Forms, Certificates, Agreements and Acknowledgments SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2013-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2013-05 provide Contracting Officers with notice of the recently passed, Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 (WPEA), Pub.L. 112- 199, and the DOECAST issued in response on April 24, 2013. This AL/FAL informs DOE/NNSA Contracting Officers to update any Non-Disclosure Policies, Forms, Certificates, Agreements, and Acknowledgements

24

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

a? a? ,itbd States Government memorandum Department of Energy DATE: APR 15 893 REPLY TO EM-421 (W. Williams, 903-8149) ATTN OF: Authorization for Remedial Action at the Former Associate Aircraft Site in SUBJECT: Fairfield, Ohio TO: W. Seay, DOE Oak Ridge Field Office The former Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing, Inc., site at 3660 Dixie Highway, Fairfield, Ohio, is designated for remedial action under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Force Control Industries is the current occupant of the site. This designation is based on the results of radiological surveys and conclusions from an authority review. Copies of the radiological survey reports and the authority review are provided for information. The site has been assigned a low priority under the FUSRAP protocol. The

25

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POLICY FLASH 2011-96 POLICY FLASH 2011-96 DATE: August 19, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: RFP Section H Clause Templates SUMMARY: On May 3, 2011, twenty two draft Section H clause templates were distributed for Procurement Director (PD), Head of Contracting Activity (HCA), General Counsel and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) review and comment. All comments received were considered and changes were made as appropriate including the elimination of six clauses. The final version of the sixteen RFP Section H clause templates identified below will be available in STRIPES. 1) COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNET PROTOCOL VERSION 6 (IPV6) IN ACQUIRING

26

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 DATE: April 25, 2011 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division B, Title I, Section 1101(a)(2) of the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter 2011-04 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Section 1101(a)(2) of the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, Pub. L. 112-10 (hereinafter "Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011). Section 1101(a)(2) of the Act provides that, unless otherwise specified, the authority and conditions provided for projects or activities (including the costs of direct loans and loan guarantees) appropriated, authorized, or

27

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2- 36 2- 36 DATE: April 23, 2012 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Policy Division Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Implementation of Division B, Title III, Title V and Division C Title VII, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No.112- 74 and Related Conference Report SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2012-08 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2012-01 provides implementing instructions and guidance for Division B, Title III, Title V and Division C Title VII, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No.112-74 and Related Conference Report. The AL addresses the following: Appropriations Act * Section 301(a) Unfunded Requests for Proposals

28

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22 22 DATE: February 1, 2012 TO: Procurement Directors FROM: Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter AL 2012-07/Financial Acquisition Letter FAL 2012-01 Congressional Notification of Pending Award of a Contract Action, Announcement of Selected Applications for Negotiation of Financial Assistance Awards, or to Award a Financial Assistance Action in Excess of $1 Million SUMMARY: AL 2012-07/FAL 2012-01 (AL/FAL) implements statutory Congressional notification of pending award of a contract action, announcement of selected applications for negotiation of financial assistance awards, or to award a financial assistance action in excess of $1 million. The total value of the award includes options, budget periods and cost share. The

29

DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OOE F 1325.3 OOE F 1325.3 m e m o randum DATE: SEP 23 1988 Department of Energy IL_. 9 REPLY TO AlTN OF, NE-23 SUElJECT. Owner Searches for Potential Sites in Chicago IL, (7 TO: W . Cottrell, ORNL 0. Kozlouski, OTS W h ile in Chicago, Illinois, on September 13, 14, and 15, 1988, I drove to the suspected addresses of several potential FUSRAP sites. No owners were contacted during this activity because most of the work was done after normal working hours or while on the way to the airport when tim e would not permit the visit. I .?I ' - Former C-B Tool Products Co. 956 E. 58th Street Chicago, Illinois The University of Chicago Ingleside Hall is located at this address. It is the University O ffice of Employment and contains a U.S. Post O ffice. The structure is several stories and looks like it may have existed in the

30

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16 16 SECTION A. Project Title: GaRDS Vehicle X-Ray System Procurement, Installation and Operations SECTION B. Project Description: . This effort will be to procure, install, and operate a Gamma Radiation Detection System (GaRDS) capable of providing X-Ray images of incoming vehicles and delivery trucks. The scanner will be equipped with a 1 Ci Cobalt-60 gamma source and will be installed in building MFC-736. This security building is located on Taylor Blvd approximately one mile south of the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) and already houses a Vehicle Explosives Detection System equipped with two 50 microgram Cf-252 sources. The purpose of the proposed detection system is to enhance the security capability for MFC facilities, research programs, and personnel.

31

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 SECTION A. Project Title: MFC Dial Room Replacement Project SECTION B. Project Description: The proposed project is to construct and operate a new dial room at the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) to continue operation of the telecommunications system at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). As part of the INL Private Branch Exchange (PBX) consolidation effort, the need to replace Central Facilities Area (CFA), Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC), and Power Burst Facility (PBF) PBX switches will eliminate the current switches potential failure and provide the necessary maintainable hardware and software to support INL missions. The project will maintain the existing dial room in the basement of MFC-752 as a splice/conduit/equipment

32

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09-001 09-001 SECTION A. Project Title: ICP Routine Maintenance SECTION B. Project Description The purpose of this document is to address actions that meet the intent of the categorical exclusion (CX) B1.3 as described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D. Both typical and non-typical types of actions, such as routine maintenance, minor modifications, and custodial services required to support safe and efficient plant operations even if performed on an infrequent basis are addressed. All of the activities will be performed in support of CWI operations. The actions will occur within site boundaries of the INL and ICP facilities and within leased facilities in Idaho Falls, Idaho. Routine maintenance includes custodial services for buildings, structures, rights-of-way, infrastructures (e.g., pathways, roads, and

33

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-ICP-12-002 SECTION A. Project Title: ICP Routine Maintenance SECTION B. Project Description The purpose of this document is to address actions that meet the intent of the categorical exclusion (CX) B1.3 as described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D. Both typical and non-typical types of actions, such as routine maintenance, minor modifications, and custodial services required to support safe and efficient plant operations even if performed on an infrequent basis are addressed. All of the activities will be performed in support of CWI operations. The actions will occur within site boundaries of the INL and ICP facilities and within leased facilities in Idaho Falls, Idaho. Routine maintenance includes custodial services for buildings, structures, rights-of-way,

34

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-ICP-12-002 SECTION A. Project Title: ICP Routine Maintenance SECTION B. Project Description The purpose of this document is to address actions that meet the intent of the categorical exclusion (CX) B1.3 as described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendix B to Subpart D. Both typical and non-typical types of actions, such as routine maintenance, minor modifications, and custodial services required to support safe and efficient plant operations even if performed on an infrequent basis are addressed. All of the activities will be performed in support of CWI operations. The actions will occur within site boundaries of the INL and ICP facilities and within leased facilities in Idaho Falls, Idaho. Routine maintenance includes custodial services for buildings, structures, rights-of-way,

35

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Grand Gulf, Unit 1: Summary of results. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect

During 1989 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to examine the potential risks during low power and shutdown operations. Two plants, Surry and Grand Gulf, were selected as the plants to be studied by Brookhaven National Laboratory (Surry) and Sandia National Laboratories (Grand Gulf). This report documents the work performed during the analysis of the Grand Gulf plant. A phased approach was used for the overall study. In Phase 1, the objectives were to identify potential vulnerable plant configurations, to characterize (on a high, medium, or low basis) the potential core damage accident scenario frequencies and risks, and to provide a foundation for a detailed Phase 2 analysis. It was in Phase 1 that the concept of plant operational states (POSs) was developed to allow the analysts to better represent the plant as it transitions from power operation to nonpower operation than was possible with the traditional technical specification divisions of modes of operation. This phase consisted of a coarse screening analysis performed for all POSs, including seismic and internal fire and flood for some POSs. In Phase 2, POS 5 (approximately cold shutdown as defined by Grand Gulf Technical Specifications) during a refueling outage was selected as the plant configuration to be analyzed based on the results of the Phase 1 study. The scope of the Level 1 study includes plant damage state analysis and uncertainty analysis and is documented in a multi-volume NUREG/CR report (i.e., NUREG/CR-6143). The internal events analysis is documented in Volume 2. Internal fire and internal flood analyses are documented in Volumes 3 and 4, respectively. A separate study on seismic analysis, documented in Volume 5, was performed for the NRC by Future Resources Associates, Inc. The Level 2/3 study of the traditional internal events is documented in Volume 6, and a summary of the results for all analyses is documented in Volume 1.

Whitehead, D.W. [ed.; Staple, B.D.; Daniel, S.L. [and others

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Modular Office Units SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - General The number of researchers and operators at MFC has significantly increased, and is projected to increase further in the future to support the expanding research activities at the facility. These activities will require Infrastructure upgrades (office space, potable water, wastewater treatment, communications, etc.) to accommodate the increasing number of personnel and work shifts. The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) will prepare a separate environmental checklist (EC) and conduct the appropriate level of environmental review for each infrastructure improvement project.

37

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 __________________________ 1 DOE's strategic plans included the Nuclear Energy Research and Development Roadmap" (2010 Predecisional draft) and reports such as "Facilities for the Future of Nuclear Energy Research: A Twenty-year Outlook". SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Sewage Lagoons Upgrades SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - MFC Sewage Lagoon Upgrades This EC focuses on upgrades to the existing 2.4 acre evaporative sewage lagoons, located north-east and outside of the MFC fenced area. These existing lagoons are currently at capacity with the approximately 800 personnel based at MFC. The number of researchers and operations

38

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades - Technical Support Building SECTION B. Project Description: Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades - General The number of researchers and operators at the Materials and Fuels Complex has significantly increased, and is projected to increase further in the future to support the expanding research activities at the facility. These activities will require infrastructure upgrades (office space, potable water, wastewater treatment, communications, etc.) to accommodate the increasing number of personnel and work shifts. The INL will prepare a separate environmental checklist (EC) and conduct the appropriate level of environmental review for each

39

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Modular Office Units SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - General The number of researchers and operators at MFC has significantly increased, and is projected to increase further in the future to support the expanding research activities at the facility. These activities will require Infrastructure upgrades (office space, potable water, wastewater treatment, communications, etc.) to accommodate the increasing number of personnel and work shifts. The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) will prepare a separate environmental checklist (EC) and conduct the appropriate level of environmental review for each infrastructure improvement project.

40

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 __________________________ 1 DOE's strategic plans included the Nuclear Energy Research and Development Roadmap" (2010 Predecisional draft) and reports such as "Facilities for the Future of Nuclear Energy Research: A Twenty-year Outlook". SECTION A. Project Title: Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC) Infrastructure Upgrades: Sewage Lagoons Upgrades SECTION B. Project Description: MFC Infrastructure Upgrades - MFC Sewage Lagoon Upgrades This EC focuses on upgrades to the existing 2.4 acre evaporative sewage lagoons, located north-east and outside of the MFC fenced area. These existing lagoons are currently at capacity with the approximately 800 personnel based at MFC. The number of researchers and operations

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-003 SECTION A. Project Title: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reactive Tracers. SECTION B. Project Description The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reactive Tracers project will be conducted at both the Raft River hydrothermal site in South Central Idaho and at the INL Research Center in Idaho Falls. The purpose of this work is to characterize tracers and test these tracers at the Raft River project through use of tracers and methods under realistic conditions. INL researchers will use an existing commercial hydrothermal site at Raft River that is currently operated by U.S. Geothermal, Inc. (USG), with whom INL has established a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) partnership. Numerous wells have previously been

42

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12 12 SECTION A. Project Title: Reactor Power Up Rate, Compressor Replacement, Neutron Radiography Restore, Liquid Scintillation Counter - Texas A&M University SECTION B. Project Description Texas A&M will replace an existing 54-year old compressor to improve reliability of the reactor operation and purchase a liquid scintillator counter to give the facility the ability to perform tritium analysis. Additionally, under NRC License R-83, Texas A&M will up rate the reactor power from 1MW to 1.5 MW and purchase equipment to restore capability to perform Neutron Radiography. SECTION C. Environmental Aspects / Potential Sources of Impact Radioactive Material Use - To calibrate the liquid scintillator, radioactive standards are used. Procedures are in place to handle.

43

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-011 EC Document No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-011 DIRECTIONS: Responsible Managers, Project Environmental Lead, and Environmental Support personnel complete this form by following the instructions found at the beginning of each section and submit to Environmental Support & Services (environmental.checklist@inl.gov). SECTION A. Project Title: CFA and ATR-Complex Analytical and R&D Laboratory Operation (Overarching) SECTION B. Project Description: This EC replaces overarching EC INL-05-017 due to changes in the laboratories identified in EC INL-05-017. The proposed action will continue to cover laboratory-based analytical and research and development (R&D) activities in laboratories located at the Central Facility Area (CFA) and the Advanced Test Reactor Complex (ATR-C) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). These activities include

44

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ICP-12-003 ICP-12-003 SECTION A. Project Title: CPP-684 - Remote Analytical Laboratory Facility Modifications SECTION B. Project Description The proposed activities are intended to render CPP-684 Remote Analytical Laboratory (RAL) as a limited access area by removing existing operational functions that are currently performed in the facility. In general, the activities will involve (1) removing the need for building heat and overall reduction of power consumption; (2) converting the existing fire protection system to an anti-freeze charged system; (3) relocating the Remote Distribution Module (RDM), which is part of installed equipment used for the emergency communication system from CPP-684 to CPP-663; and, if pursued, (4) perform specific tasks which would allow a downgrade CPP-684

45

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10-009 10-009 SECTION A. Project Title Idaho Falls (IF)-608 Uninterrupted Power Supply Upgrade Project SECTION B. Project Description: This project increases the Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) capacity in the IF-608 Information Operations and Research Center (IORC) by removing two existing UPS systems (50 KVA and 36 KVA) and installing a 225 KVA system. A ~15 ton cooling unit will be installed on the roof for heat removal. Associated work will include additional electrical panel(s) and electrical conduit rerouting and installation. Disposal of the existing UPS systems may be required depending on whether they are claimed off the excess list. This work will be performed either under blanket subcontracts or by a separate construction contractor and is planned for completion by

46

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10-009 10-009 SECTION A. Project Title Idaho Falls (IF)-608 Uninterrupted Power Supply Upgrade Project SECTION B. Project Description: This project increases the Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) capacity in the IF-608 Information Operations and Research Center (IORC) by removing two existing UPS systems (50 KVA and 36 KVA) and installing a 225 KVA system. A ~15 ton cooling unit will be installed on the roof for heat removal. Associated work will include additional electrical panel(s) and electrical conduit rerouting and installation. Disposal of the existing UPS systems may be required depending on whether they are claimed off the excess list. This work will be performed either under blanket subcontracts or by a separate construction contractor and is planned for completion by

47

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-003 SECTION A. Project Title: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reactive Tracers. SECTION B. Project Description The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reactive Tracers project will be conducted at both the Raft River hydrothermal site in South Central Idaho and at the INL Research Center in Idaho Falls. The purpose of this work is to characterize tracers and test these tracers at the Raft River project through use of tracers and methods under realistic conditions. INL researchers will use an existing commercial hydrothermal site at Raft River that is currently operated by U.S. Geothermal, Inc. (USG), with whom INL has established a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) partnership. Numerous wells have previously been

48

EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN FOR NUCLEAR REACTORS  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

An emergency shutdown or scram apparatus for use in a nuclear reactor that includes a neutron absorber suspended from a temperature responsive substance that is selected to fail at a preselected temperature in excess of the normal reactor operating temperature, whereby the neutron absorber is released and allowed to fall under gravity to a preselected position within the reactor core is presented. (AEC)

Paget, J.A.; Koutz, S.L.; Stone, R.S.; Stewart, H.B.

1963-12-24T23:59:59.000Z

49

Date Date Date Date Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This thesis investigates the problem of regulating the temperature of a conditioned space using a Solar Assisted Air Conditioning Systems (SAACS) prototype located at Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico. The SAACS Prototype consists of a 66 flat plate solar collector array with 115.4 m 2 of selective surface area, a 35 kW single-effect lithium-bromide absorption chiller, a 84 kW cooling tower, a 50 kW auxiliary hot water boiler, a 5700 liter storage tank equipped with flexible stratification manifolds, and a 1800 l/hr air-handling unit. A discrete-time state-space model of the absorption chiller and a linear model of the plant to be controlled (the conditioned space) are identified and presented. Experimental data was used for the determination of these models. A temperature controller was designed and applied to the plant model. This controller operates the absorption chiller under multiple load conditions and regulates the flow in the chilled water line based on the conditioned space requirements. The designed controller was implemented in the SAACS prototype. The system’s

Carlos A. González Lozano; Miguel Vélez Reyes, Ph.D.; Gerson Beauchamp Báez, Ph.D., Ph.D.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

50

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry, Unit 1. Volume 5: Analysis of core damage frequency from seismic events during mid-loop operations  

SciTech Connect

In 1989 the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to examine carefully the potential risks during low-power and shutdown operations. The program included two parallel projects, one at Brookhaven National Laboratory studying a pressurized water reactor (Surry Unit 1) and the other at Sandia National Laboratories studying a boiling water reactor (Grand Gulf). Both the Brookhaven and Sandia projects have examined only accidents initiated by internal plant faults--so-called ``internal initiators.`` This project, which has explored the likelihood of seismic-initiated core damage accidents during refueling shutdown conditions, is complementary to the internal-initiator analyses at Brookhaven and Sandia. This report covers the seismic analysis at Surry Unit 1. All of the many systems modeling assumptions, component non-seismic failure rates, and human error rates that were used in the internal-initiator study at Surry have been adopted here, so that the results of the two studies can be as comparable as possible. Both the Brookhaven study and this study examine only two shutdown plant operating states (POSs) during refueling outages at Surry, called POS 6 and POS 10, which represent mid-loop operation before and after refueling, respectively. This analysis has been limited to work analogous to a level-1 seismic PRA, in which estimates have been developed for the core-damage frequency from seismic events during POSs 6 and 10. The results of the analysis are that the core-damage frequency of earthquake-initiated accidents during refueling outages in POS 6 and POS 10 is found to be low in absolute terms, less than 10{sup {minus}6}/year.

Budnitz, R.J. [Future Resources Associates, Inc., Berkeley, CA (United States); Davis, P.R. [PRD Consulting (United States); Ravindra, M.K.; Tong, W.H. [EQE International, Inc., Irvine, CA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Grand Gulf, Unit 1. Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events for plant operational state 5 during a refueling outage. Internal events appendices K to M  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides supporting documentation for various tasks associated with the performance of the probabilistic risk assessment for Plant Operational State 5 (approximately Cold Shutdown as defined by Grand Gulf Technical Specifications) during a refueling outage at Grand Gulf, Unit 1 as documented in Volume 2, Part 1 of NUREG/CR-6143. The report contains the following appendices: K - HEP Locator Files; L - Supporting Information for the Plant Damage State Analysis; M - Summary of Results from the Coarse Screening Analysis - Phase 1A.

Forester, J.; Yakle, J.; Walsh, B. [Science Applications International Corp., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Darby, J. [Science and Engineering Associates, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Whitehead, D.; Staple, B.; Brown, T. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

52

Fuel cell system logic for differentiating between rapid and normal shutdown commands  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A method of controlling the operation of a fuel cell system wherein each shutdown command for the system is subjected to decision logic which determines whether the command should be a normal shutdown command or rapid shutdown command. If the logic determines that the shutdown command should be a normal shutdown command, then the system is shutdown in a normal step-by-step process in which the hydrogen stream is consumed within the system. If the logic determines that the shutdown command should be a rapid shutdown command, the hydrogen stream is removed from the system either by dumping to atmosphere or routing to storage.

Keskula, Donald H. (Webster, NY); Doan, Tien M. (Columbia, MD); Clingerman, Bruce J. (Palmyra, NY)

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry, Unit-1: Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events during mid-loop operations. Appendix I, Volume 2, Part 5  

SciTech Connect

Traditionally, probabilistic risk assessments (PRA) of severe accidents in nuclear power plants have considered initiating events potentially occurring only during full power operation. Some previous screening analyses that were performed for other modes of operation suggested that risks during those modes were small relative to full power operation. However, more recent studies and operational experience have implied that accidents during low power and shutdown could be significant contributors to risk. During 1989, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to carefully examine the potential risks during low power and shutdown operations. The program includes two parallel projects being performed by Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL) and Sandia National Labs. (SNL). Two plants, Surry (pressurized water reactor) and Grand Gulf (boiling water reactor), were selected as the plants to be studied. The objectives of the program are to assess the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power operation and to compare the estimated core damage frequencies, important accident sequences and other qualitative and quantitative results with those accidents initiated during full power operation as assessed in NUREG-1150. The objective of this volume of the report is to document the approach utilized in the level-1 internal events PRA for the Surry plant, and discuss the results obtained. A phased approach was used in the level-1 program. In phase 1, which was completed in Fall 1991, a coarse screening analysis examining accidents initiated by internal events (including internal fire and flood) was performed for all plant operational states (POSs). The objective of the phase 1 study was to identify potential vulnerable plant configurations, to characterize (on a high, medium, or low basis) the potential core damage accident scenarios, and to provide a foundation for a detailed phase 2 analysis.

Chu, T.L.; Musicki, Z.; Kohut, P.; Yang, J.; Bozoki, G.; Hsu, C.J.; Diamond, D.J. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Bley, D.; Johnson, D. [PLG Inc., Newport Beach, CA (United States); Holmes, B. [AEA Technology, Dorset (United Kingdom)] [and others

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Grand Gulf, Unit 1. Volume 5: Analysis of core damage frequency from seismic events for plant operational state 5 during a refueling outage  

SciTech Connect

In 1989 the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to examine carefully the potential risks during low-power and shutdown operations. The program included two parallel projects, one at Sandia National Laboratories studying a boiling water reactor (Grand Gulf), and the other at Brookhaven National Laboratory studying a pressurized water reactor (Surry Unit 1). Both the Sandia and Brookhaven projects have examined only accidents initiated by internal plant faults---so-called ``internal initiators.`` This project, which has explored the likelihood of seismic-initiated core damage accidents during refueling outage conditions, is complementary to the internal-initiator analyses at Brookhaven and Sandia. This report covers the seismic analysis at Grand Gulf. All of the many systems modeling assumptions, component non-seismic failure rates, and human effort rates that were used in the internal-initiator study at Grand Gulf have been adopted here, so that the results of the study can be as comparable as possible. Both the Sandia study and this study examine only one shutdown plant operating state (POS) at Grand Gulf, namely POS 5 representing cold shutdown during a refueling outage. This analysis has been limited to work analogous to a level-1 seismic PRA, in which estimates have been developed for the core-damage frequency from seismic events during POS 5. The results of the analysis are that the core-damage frequency for earthquake-initiated accidents during refueling outages in POS 5 is found to be quite low in absolute terms, less than 10{sup {minus}7}/year.

Budnitz, R.J. [Future Resources Associates, Inc., Berkeley, CA (United States); Davis, P.R. [PRD Consulting (United States); Ravindra, M.K.; Tong, W.H. [EQE International, Inc., Irvine, CA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

55

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry: Unit 1, Volume 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document contains a summarization of the results and insights from the Level 1 accident sequence analyses of internally initiated events, internally initiated fire and flood events, seismically initiated events, and the Level 2/3 risk analysis of internally initiated events (excluding fire and flood) for Surry, Unit 1. The analysis was confined to mid-loop operation, which can occur during three plant operational states (identified as POSs R6 and R10 during a refueling outage, and POS D6 during drained maintenance). The report summarizes the Level 1 information contained in Volumes 2--5 and the Level 2/3 information contained in Volume 6 of NUREG/CR-6144.

Chu, T.L.; Pratt, W.T. [eds.; Musicki, Z. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

56

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Grand Gulf, Unit 1: Evaluation of severe accident risks for plant operational state 5 during a refueling outage. Supporting MELCOR calculations, Volume 6, Part 2  

SciTech Connect

To gain a better understanding of the risk significance of low power and shutdown modes of operation, the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research at the NRC established programs to investigate the likelihood and severity of postulated accidents that could occur during low power and shutdown (LP&S) modes of operation at commercial nuclear power plants. To investigate the likelihood of severe core damage accidents during off power conditions, probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs) were performed for two nuclear plants: Unit 1 of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, which is a BWR-6 Mark III boiling water reactor (BWR), and Unit 1 of the Surry Power Station, which is a three-loop, subatmospheric, pressurized water reactor (PWR). The analysis of the BWR was conducted at Sandia National Laboratories while the analysis of the PWR was performed at Brookhaven National Laboratory. This multi-volume report presents and discusses the results of the BWR analysis. The subject of this part presents the deterministic code calculations, performed with the MELCOR code, that were used to support the development and quantification of the PRA models. The background for the work documented in this report is summarized, including how deterministic codes are used in PRAS, why the MELCOR code is used, what the capabilities and features of MELCOR are, and how the code has been used by others in the past. Brief descriptions of the Grand Gulf plant and its configuration during LP&S operation and of the MELCOR input model developed for the Grand Gulf plant in its LP&S configuration are given.

Kmetyk, L.N.; Brown, T.D. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

Shutdown 2013 Update  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Shutdown 2013 Update Shutdown 2013 Update Shutdown 2013 Update Print Friday, 01 March 2013 15:43 Sextupole upgrade The ALS is replacing all of the corrector magnets with sextupoles (48 of them) to allow for tighter horizontal control of the beam, thereby increasing beam brightness. This so-called "lattice upgrade" will also increase beam brightness by concentrating the horizontal emittance. (Top) ALS Project and Facility Management Group Leader Steve Rossi proudly shows off a newly-installed sextupole magnet. (Center) Christoph Steier and Arnaud Madur discuss challenges encountered during the installation. (Bottom) A corrector magnet that has been removed from the ring. Some sextupole magnets awaiting installation in the Building 15 staging area. Cold head replacement

58

Shutdown 2013 Update  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Shutdown 2013 Update Shutdown 2013 Update Shutdown 2013 Update Print Sextupole upgrade The ALS is replacing all of the corrector magnets with sextupoles (48 of them) to allow for tighter horizontal control of the beam, thereby increasing beam brightness. This so-called "lattice upgrade" will also increase beam brightness by concentrating the horizontal emittance. (Top) ALS Project and Facility Management Group Leader Steve Rossi proudly shows off a newly-installed sextupole magnet. (Center) Christoph Steier and Arnaud Madur discuss challenges encountered during the installation. (Bottom) A corrector magnet that has been removed from the ring. Some sextupole magnets awaiting installation in the Building 15 staging area. Cold head replacement The cooling elements in the three superbend magnets (and one spare) need to

59

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry, Unit-1: Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events during mid-loop operations. Appendices F-H, Volume 2, Part 4  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Traditionally, probabilistic risk assessments (PRA) of severe accidents in nuclear power plants have considered initiating events potentially occurring only during full power operation. Some previous screening analyses that were performed for other modes of operation suggested that risks during those modes were small relative to full power operation. However, more recent studies and operational experience have implied that accidents during low power and shutdown could be significant contributors to risk. Two plants, Surry (pressurized water reactor) and Grand Gulf (boiling water reactor), were selected as the plants to be studied. The objectives of the program are to assess the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power operation and to compare the estimated core damage frequencies, important accident sequences and other qualitative and quantitative results with those accidents initiated during full power operation as assessed in NUREG-1150. The scope of the program includes that of a level-3 PRA. In phase 2, mid-loop operation was selected as the plant configuration to be analyzed based on the results of the phase 1 study. The objective of the phase 2 study is to perform a detailed analysis of the potential accident scenarios that may occur during mid-loop operation, and compare the results with those of NUREG-1150. The scope of the level-1 study includes plant damage state analysis, and uncertainty analysis. Volume 1 summarizes the results of the study. Internal events analysis is documented in Volume 2. It also contains an appendix that documents the part of the phase 1 study that has to do with POSs other than mid-loop operation. Internal fire and internal flood analyses are documented in Volumes 3 and 4. A separate study on seismic analysis, documented in Volume 5, was performed for the NRC by Future Resources Associates, Inc. Volume 6 documents the accident progression, source terms, and consequence analysis.

Chu, T.L.; Musicki, Z.; Kohut, P.; Yang, J.; Bozoki, G.; Hsu, C.J.; Diamond, D.J. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Bley, D.; Johnson, D. [PLG Inc., Newport Beach, CA (United States); Holmes, B. [AEA Technology, Dorset (United Kingdom)] [and others

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

60

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry, Unit 1: Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events during mid-loop operations. Appendix E (Sections E.9-E.16), Volume 2, Part 3B  

SciTech Connect

Traditionally, probabilistic risk assessments (PRA) of severe accidents in nuclear power plants have considered initiating events potentially occurring only during full power operation. Some previous screening analyses that were performed for other modes of operation suggested that risks during those modes were small relative to full power operation. However, more recent studies and operational experience have implied that accidents during low power and shutdown could be significant contributors to risk. Two plants, Surry (pressurized water reactor) and Grand Gulf (boiling water reactor), were selected as the plants to be studied. The objectives of the program are to assess the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power operation and to compare the estimated core damage frequencies, important accident sequences and other qualitative and quantitative results with those accidents initiated during full power operation as assessed in NUREG-1150. The scope of the program includes that of a level-3 PRA. In phase 2, mid-loop operation was selected as the plant configuration to be analyzed based on the results of the phase 1 study. The objective of the phase 2 study is to perform a detailed analysis of the potential accident scenarios that may occur during mid-loop operation, and compare the results with those of NUREG-1150. The scope of the level-1 study includes plant damage state analysis, and uncertainty analysis. Volume 1 summarizes the results of the study. Internal events analysis is documented in Volume 2. It also contains an appendix that documents the part of the phase 1 study that has to do with POSs other than mid-loop operation. Internal fire and internal flood analyses are documented in Volumes 3 and 4. A separate study on seismic analysis, documented in Volume 5, was performed for the NRC by Future Resources Associates, Inc. Volume 6 documents the accident progression, source terms, and consequence analysis.

Chu, T.L.; Musicki, Z.; Kohut, P.; Yang, J.; Bozoki, G.; Hsu, C.J.; Diamond, D.J.; Wong, S.M. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Bley, D.; Johnson, D. [PLG Inc., Newport Beach, CA (United States)] [and others

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry, Unit 1: Evaluation of severe accident risk during mid-loop operations. Main report. Volume 6. Part 1  

SciTech Connect

During 1989, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to carefully examine the potential risks during low power and shutdown operations. The program includes two parallel projects being performed by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Two plants, Surry (pressurized water reactor) and Grand Gulf (boiling water reactor), were selected as the plants to be studied. The objectives of the program are to assess the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power operation and to compare the estimated core damage frequencies, important accident sequences and other qualitative and quantitative results with those accidents initiated during full power operation as assessed in NUREG-1150. The scope of the program includes that of a level-3 PRA. A phased approach was used in the level-1 program. In phase 1 which was completed in Fall 1991, a coarse screening analysis including internal fire and flood was performed for all plant operational states (POSs). The objective of the phase 1 study was to identify potential vulnerable plant configurations, to characterize (on a high, medium, or low basis) the potential core damage accident scenarios, and to provide a foundation for a detailed phase 2 analysis. In phase 2, mid-loop operation was selected as the plant configuration to be analyzed based on the results of the phase 1 study. The objective of the phase 2 study is to perform a detailed analysis of the potential accident scenarios that may occur during mid-loop operation, and compare the results with those of NUREG-1150. The results of the phase 2 level 2/3 study are the subject of this volume of NUREG/CR-6144, Volume 6.

Jo, J.; Lin, C.C.; Neymotin, L. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)] [and others

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

62

Shutdown 2013 Update  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Shutdown 2013 Update Print Shutdown 2013 Update Print Sextupole upgrade The ALS is replacing all of the corrector magnets with sextupoles (48 of them) to allow for tighter horizontal control of the beam, thereby increasing beam brightness. This so-called "lattice upgrade" will also increase beam brightness by concentrating the horizontal emittance. (Top) ALS Project and Facility Management Group Leader Steve Rossi proudly shows off a newly-installed sextupole magnet. (Center) Christoph Steier and Arnaud Madur discuss challenges encountered during the installation. (Bottom) A corrector magnet that has been removed from the ring. Some sextupole magnets awaiting installation in the Building 15 staging area. Cold head replacement The cooling elements in the three superbend magnets (and one spare) need to

63

Shutdown 2013 Update  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Shutdown 2013 Update Print Shutdown 2013 Update Print Sextupole upgrade The ALS is replacing all of the corrector magnets with sextupoles (48 of them) to allow for tighter horizontal control of the beam, thereby increasing beam brightness. This so-called "lattice upgrade" will also increase beam brightness by concentrating the horizontal emittance. (Top) ALS Project and Facility Management Group Leader Steve Rossi proudly shows off a newly-installed sextupole magnet. (Center) Christoph Steier and Arnaud Madur discuss challenges encountered during the installation. (Bottom) A corrector magnet that has been removed from the ring. Some sextupole magnets awaiting installation in the Building 15 staging area. Cold head replacement The cooling elements in the three superbend magnets (and one spare) need to

64

DOE/EA-1488: Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition, Medical Isotope Production, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (12/04)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

88 88 FINAL Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition, Medical Isotope Production, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee December 2004 U. S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations 04-049(doc)/120204 04-049(doc)/120204 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION contributed to the preparation of this document and should not be considered an eligible contractor for its review. Environmental Assessment for the U-233 Disposition, Medical Isotope Production, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee Date Issued-December 2004 U. S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations 04-049(doc)/120204 CONTENTS

65

PRELIMINARY Run Shutdown BL Commissioning  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PRELIMINARY Run Shutdown BL Commissioning Maintenance AP SPEAR Down Injector Startup University Holidays Spear Down SPEAR Startup MA Sep Oct 2011 2012 MA Mar Apr May Jun Jul...

66

Controlled shutdown of a fuel cell  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A method is provided for the shutdown of a fuel cell system to relieve system overpressure while maintaining air compressor operation, and corresponding vent valving and control arrangement. The method and venting arrangement are employed in a fuel cell system, for instance a vehicle propulsion system, comprising, in fluid communication, an air compressor having an outlet for providing air to the system, a combustor operative to provide combustor exhaust to the fuel processor.

Clingerman, Bruce J. (Palmyra, NY); Keskula, Donald H. (Webster, NY)

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

67

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Grand Gulf, Unit 1. Volume 2, Part 1C: Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events for plant operational State 5 during a refueling outage, Main report (Sections 11--14)  

SciTech Connect

This document contains the accident sequence analysis of internally initiated events for Grand Gulf, Unit 1 as it operates in the Low Power and Shutdown Plant Operational State 5 during a refueling outage. The report documents the methodology used during the analysis, describes the results from the application of the methodology, and compares the results with the results from two full power analyses performed on Grand Gulf.

Whitehead, D. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Darby, J. [Science and Engineering Associates, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Yakle, J. [Science Applications International Corp., Albuquerque, NM (United States)] [and others

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

Boiling Water Reactor Shutdown Chemistry and Dose Summary: September 2010  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This 2010 update provides an annual report of shutdown radiation dose rates at 46 boiling water reactors (BWRs) that participate in the Electric Power Research Institute's (EPRI's) BWR Chemistry Monitoring and Assessment program and supersedes the BWR Radiation Assessment and Control (BRAC) Summary that was issued twice a year. In addition to BRAC dose rates, the report also includes information on operating and shutdown water chemistry and worker outage dose and contamination.

2010-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

69

Preliminary Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel from Shutdown Sites  

SciTech Connect

This report fulfills the M2 milestone M2FT-13PN0912022, “Stranded Sites De-Inventorying Report.” In January 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued the Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste (DOE 2013). Among the elements contained in this strategy is an initial focus on accepting used nuclear fuel from shutdown reactor sites. This focus is consistent with the recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, which identified removal of stranded used nuclear fuel at shutdown sites as a priority so that these sites may be completely decommissioned and put to other beneficial uses (BRC 2012). Shutdown sites are defined as those commercial nuclear power reactor sites where the nuclear power reactors have been shut down and the site has been decommissioned or is undergoing decommissioning. In this report, a preliminary evaluation of removing used nuclear fuel from 12 shutdown sites was conducted. The shutdown sites were Maine Yankee, Yankee Rowe, Connecticut Yankee, Humboldt Bay, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Trojan, La Crosse, Zion, Crystal River, Kewaunee, and San Onofre. These sites have no other operating nuclear power reactors at their sites and have also notified the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission that their reactors have permanently ceased power operations and that nuclear fuel has been permanently removed from their reactor vessels. Shutdown reactors at sites having other operating reactors are not included in this evaluation.

Maheras, Steven J.; Best, Ralph E.; Ross, Steven B.; Buxton, Kenneth A.; England, Jeffery L.; McConnell, Paul E.

2013-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

70

Fuel cell system shutdown with anode pressure control  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A venting methodology and pressure sensing and vent valving arrangement for monitoring anode bypass valve operating during the normal shutdown of a fuel cell apparatus of the type used in vehicle propulsion systems. During a normal shutdown routine, the pressure differential between the anode inlet and anode outlet is monitored in real time in a period corresponding to the normal closing speed of the anode bypass valve and the pressure differential at the end of the closing cycle of the anode bypass valve is compared to the pressure differential at the beginning of the closing cycle. If the difference in pressure differential at the beginning and end of the anode bypass closing cycle indicates that the anode bypass valve has not properly closed, a system controller switches from a normal shutdown mode to a rapid shutdown mode in which the anode inlet is instantaneously vented by rapid vents.

Clingerman, Bruce J. (Palmyra, NY); Doan, Tien M. (Columbia, MD); Keskula, Donald H. (Webster, NY)

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power plant on ambient mercury  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power plant on ambient mercury Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power plant on ambient mercury species Title Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power plant on ambient mercury species Publication Type Journal Article LBNL Report Number LBNL-6097E Year of Publication 2013 Authors Wang, Yungang, Jiaoyan Huang, Philip K. Hopke, Oliver V. Rattigan, David C. Chalupa, Mark J. Utell, and Thomas M. Holsen Journal Chemosphere Volume 92 Issue 4 Pagination 360-367 Date Published 07/2013 Abstract In the spring of 2008, a 260MWe coal-fired power plant (CFPP) located in Rochester, New York was closed over a 4 month period. Using a 2-years data record, the impacts of the shutdown of the CFPP on nearby ambient concentrations of three Hg species were quantified. The arithmetic average ambient concentrations of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), and particulate mercury (PBM) during December 2007-November 2009 were 1.6ng/m3, 5.1pg/m3, and 8.9pg/m3, respectively. The median concentrations of GEM, GOM, and PBM significantly decreased by 12%, 73%, and 50% after the CFPP closed (Mann-Whitney test, p<0.001). Positive Matrix Factorization (EPA PMF v4.1) identified six factors including O3-rich, traffic, gas phase oxidation, wood combustion, nucleation, and CFPP. When the CFPP was closed, median concentrations of GEM, GOM, and PBM apportioned to the CFPP factor significantly decreased by 25%, 74%, and 67%, respectively, compared to those measured when the CFPP was still in operation (Mann-Whitney test, p<0.001). Conditional probability function (CPF) analysis showed the greatest reduction in all three Hg species was associated with northwesterly winds pointing toward the CFPP. These changes were clearly attributable to the closure of the CFPP.

72

Low Power and Shutdown Risk Assessment Benchmarking Study  

SciTech Connect

(B204)Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) insights are now used by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) to confirm the level of safety for plant operations and to justify changes in nuclear power plant operating requirements, both on an exception basis and as changeds to a plant's licensing basis. This report examines qualitative and quantitative risk assessments during shutdown plant states, providing feedback to utilities in the use of qualitative models for outage risk management, and also providing input to the development of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) Low Power and Shutdown PRA Standard.

J.Mitman, J. Julius, R. Berucio, M. Phillips, J. Grobbelaaar, D. Bley, R. Budniz

2002-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

73

Method for the shutdown and restarting of combined power plant  

SciTech Connect

In shutting down a combined power plant, a steam turbine is first shutdown while operation of a gas turbine at high load is being continued, and the steam generated in a waste heat recovery boiler is passed on to a condenser through a bypass system bypassing the steam turbine. The gas turbine is then shutdown when this condition prevails, and gland sections of the steam turbine receive a supply of gland sealing steam which has been heated by a heater to a temperature level close to that of the steam attained while the steam turbine is in operation, thereby to maintain the temperature of the metal of the steam turbine gland sections at a desired level during the time the steam and gas turbines are shutdown. In restarting the combined plant, the gas turbine is first started and then the steam turbine is started.

Hashimoto, T.; Kuribayashi, T.

1981-08-11T23:59:59.000Z

74

MEMORANDUfl DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE DATE cl e-w --we-- SUBJECT: __------------------------ _ OWNER (S) -----w-e Pamt a __---------------------- current: -------------------_______ Owner contacted 0 yes 0 no; if yes, date contacted --------w-w-- TYPE OF OPERATION ------------- erearch & Development a Facility Typr Praduction scale trstinq Pilot Scale Bench Seal e Process Theoretical Studies Sample & Analysis n Production 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRACT ---------------- 0 Prim* 7z Subcontract& Purchase Order . Mmuf l cturing University Research Organization Government Sponsored Facility Rther ----B.-------------- 0 Othrr information (i.e., cost + fixrd fee, unit prier, time 81 material, rte) -m-M--- -------------------------- ---------------------------- Contract/Purchase Order M

75

MEMORANDUM DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE DATE :;++, -m--s B-w- -w---m-- SUBJECT: , ::;:: JLLiucd ALTERN&TE e---e---- --------------------------- CITY&da NCIME: ---------------------- - --------------------- J&f STATE: OWNER ( S 1 -----m-e Past 0 Current: ------------------------ Owner contacted 0 -------------------------- 0 yes no; if ye=, date contacted ------w---s-- TYPE OF OPERATION ----w------------ F Research & Development 0 Facility Type 0 Production scale testing F Pilot Scale 0 Manufacturing 0 Bench Scale Process 0 University Research 0 Theoretical 0 Organization Studies 0 Sample & Analysis 0 Government Sponsored Facility 0 Other --------------------- 0 Production 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRfiCT a--------------- 0 Prim- 0 Subcontract& s Purchase Order

76

HRSG Startup and Shutdown Guidelines for Avoiding Heat Recovery Steam Generator Pressure Part Failures  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Most of the damage to heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) pressure parts is caused by transiently high thermal-mechanical stresses that occur during shutdown and startup, along with cycle chemistry changes imposed by cyclic operation. Unit shutdown and startup impose considerably more potential for cumulative pressure part damage than stable on-load operation does. Essentially every HRSG damage mechanism is exacerbated by cyclic operationeither directly, through transiently high localized stresses appli...

2009-07-28T23:59:59.000Z

77

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Surry, Unit 1: Evaluation of severe accident risk during mid-loop operations. Volume 6, Part 2: Appendices  

SciTech Connect

The objectives are to assess the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power operation and to compare the estimated core damage frequencies, important accident sequences and other qualitative and quantitative results with those accidents initiated during full power operation. In phase 2, mid-loop operation was selected as the plant configuration to be analyzed. Volume 1 summarizes the results of the study. The scope of the level-1 study includes plant damage state analyses, and uncertainty analysis. The internal event analysis is documented in Volume 2. The internal fire and internal flood analysis are documented in Volumes 3 and 4, respectively. A separate study on seismic analysis, documented in Volume 5, was performed for the NRC by Future Resources Associated, Inc. A phased approach was used in the level 2/3 PRA program, however both phases addressed the risk from only mid-loop operation. The first phase of the level 2/3 PRA was initiated in late 1991 and consisted of an Abridged Risk Study. This study was completed in May 1992 and was focused on accident progression and consequences, conditional on core damage. Phase 2 is a more detailed study in which an evaluation of risk during mid-loop operation was performed. The results of the phase 2 level 2/3 study are the subject of this volume of NUREG/CR-6144, Volume 6. This report, Volume 6, Part 2, consists of five appendices containing supporting information for: the PDS (plant damage state) analysis; the accident progression analysis; the source term analysis; the consequence analysis; and the Melcor analysis. 73 figs., 21 tabs.

Jo, J.; Lin, C.C.; Neymotin, L.; Mubayi, V. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

78

Issue Date: Expiration Date:  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Discussion: Enclosed for your review and comment are the draft revisions to the FSME Procedure SA-103, Reviewing the Common Indicator, Technical Staffing and Training. SA-103 procedure describes the process and guidelines to be used by IMPEP team members when reviewing the adequacy of an NRC Region or State’s program for the staffing and training of technical personnel. We would appreciate receiving your comments within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this communication, please contact me at 301-415-3340 or the individual named below.

Training; Robert J. Lewis; Robert J. Lewis; A. Duncan White

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

Shutdown system for a nuclear reactor  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

An ultimate shutdown system is provided for termination of neutronic activity in a nuclear reactor. The shutdown system includes bead chains comprising spherical containers suspended on a flexible cable. The containers are comprised of mating hemispherical shells which provide a ruggedized enclosure for reactor poison material. The bead chains, normally suspended above the reactor core on storage spools, are released for downward travel upon command from an external reactor monitor. The chains are capable of horizontal movement, so as to flow around obstructions in the reactor during their downward motion. 8 figs.

Groh, E.F.; Olson, A.P.; Wade, D.C.; Robinson, B.W.

1984-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

80

Shutdown system for a nuclear reactor  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

An ultimate shutdown system is provided for termination of neutronic activity in a nuclear reactor. The shutdown system includes bead chains comprising spherical containers suspended on a flexible cable. The containers are comprised of mating hemispherical shells which provide a ruggedized enclosure for reactor poison material. The bead chains, normally suspended above the reactor core on storage spools, are released for downward travel upon command from an external reactor monitor. The chains are capable of horizontal movement, so as to flow around obstructions in the reactor during their downward motion.

Groh, Edward F. (Naperville, IL); Olson, Arne P. (Western Springs, IL); Wade, David C. (Naperville, IL); Robinson, Bryan W. (Oak Lawn, IL)

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Shutdown system for a nuclear reactor  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

An ultimate shutdown system is provided for termination of neutronic activity in a nuclear reactor. The shutdown system includes bead chains comprising spherical containers suspended on a flexible cable. The containers are comprised of mating hemispherical shells which provide a ruggedized enclosure for reactor poison material. The bead chains, normally suspended above the reactor core on storage spools, are released for downward travel upon command from an external reactor monitor. The chains are capable of horizontal movement, so as to flow around obstructions in the reactor during their downward motion.

Groh, E.F.; Olson, A.P.; Wade, D.C.; Robinson, B.W.

1982-01-20T23:59:59.000Z

82

Shutdown plus 3 - a look at Yankee decommissioning experience  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In three years, the Yankee Nuclear Power Station has not only made the transition from a facility with a full power operating license to a shut down facility but to a facility with a mature and experienced organization poised to effectively and efficiently decommission the remainder of the plant. Opportunities were acted upon to reduce the cost of running and dismantling a shut-down facility. This paper describes some of those opportunities and Yankee`s future strategy for dismantling in an environment with limited waste disposal availability.

Szymczak, W.J. [Yankee Atomic Electric Co., Bolton, MA (United States)

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

83

Starting From Total Shutdown Initial Position  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

) and exposed to atmospheric pressure will destroy pump oil. #12;#12;Starting From Total Shutdown Initial Position: · Roughing pump: OFF · Forepump: OFF · Diff. pump-Vent to CENTER position. 5. Open Accumulator Valve 6. Turn on diffusion pump. Repeller light should go on

McCombe, Bruce D.

84

Wind Power Impacts on Electric Power System Operating Costs: Summary and Perspective on Work to Date; Preprint  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Electric utility system planners and operators are concerned that variations in wind plant output may increase the operating costs of the system. This concern arises because the system must maintain an instantaneous balance between the aggregate demand for electric power and the total power generated by all power plants feeding the system. This is a highly sophisticated task that utility operators and automatic controls perform routinely, based on well-known operating characteristics for conventional power plants and a great deal of experience accumulated over many years. System operators are concerned that variations in wind plant output will force the conventional power plants to provide compensating variations to maintain system balance, thus causing the conventional power plants to deviate from operating points chosen to minimize the total cost of operating the system. The operators' concerns are compounded by the fact that conventional power plants are generally under their control and thus are dispatchable, whereas wind plants are controlled instead by nature. Although these are valid concerns, the key issue is not whether a system with a significant amount of wind capacity can be operated reliably, but rather to what extent the system operating costs are increased by the variability of the wind.

Smith, J. C.; DeMeo, E. A.; Parsons, B.; Milligan, M.

2004-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

Shutdown Protection of Steam Turbines Using Dehumidified Air  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

EPRI research has determined that proper protection of the steam turbine during shutdown periods is essential to the prevention of damage by stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue. This report provides information on both the incipient damage of improper shutdown and techniques for assessing and applying dehumidified air for shutdown protection.

2008-03-26T23:59:59.000Z

86

Fault tree analysis of the EBR-II reactor shutdown system  

SciTech Connect

As part of the level I Probabilistic Risk Assessment of the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II), detailed fault trees for the reactor shutdown system are developed. Fault tree analysis is performed for two classes of transient events that are of particular importance to EBR-II operation: loss-of-flow and transient-overpower. In all parts of EBR-II reactor shutdown system, redundancy has been utilized in order to reduce scram failure probability. Therefore, heavy emphasis is placed in the fault trees on the common cause failures (CCFs) among similar mechanical components of the control and safety rods and among similar electrical components in redundant detection channels and shutdown strings. Generic beta-factors that cover all types of similar components and reflect redundancy level are used to model the CCFs. Human errors are addressed in the fault trees in two major areas: errors that would prevent the automatic scram channels from detecting the abnormal events and errors that would prevent utilization of the manual scram capability. The fault tree analysis of the EBR-II shutdown system has provided not only a systematic process for calculating the probabilities of system failures but also useful insights into the system and how its elements interact during transient events that require shutdown.

Kamal, S.A.; Hill, D.J.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

Audit of Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant, IG-0408  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 24, 1997 June 24, 1997 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: John C. Layton Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: "Audit of Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant" BACKGROUND: The end of the Cold War has allowed the Department of Energy (Department) to reduce weapons production and consolidate operations throughout the nuclear weapons complex. As part of this consolidation, the Department has either transferred or is planning to transfer all weapons-related and production activities at the Mound Plant to other Departmental facilities. The objective of this audit was to determine if the shutdown and transition of the Mound Plant was progressing efficiently and effectively. More

88

Control rod drive for reactor shutdown  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A means for rapidly shutting down or scramming a nuclear reactor, such as a liquid metal-cooled fast breeder reactor, and serves as a backup to the primary shutdown system. The control rod drive consists basically of an in-core assembly, a drive shaft and seal assembly, and a control drive mechanism. The control rod is driven into the core region of the reactor by gravity and hydraulic pressure forces supplied by the reactor coolant, thus assuring that common mode failures will not interfere with or prohibit scramming the reactor when necessary.

McKeehan, Ernest R. (Los Gatos, CA); Shawver, Bruce M. (San Jose, CA); Schiro, Donald J. (San Jose, CA); Taft, William E. (Los Gatos, CA)

1976-01-20T23:59:59.000Z

89

Rodded shutdown system for a nuclear reactor  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A top mounted nuclear reactor diverse rodded shutdown system utilizing gas fed into a pressure bearing bellows region sealed at the upper extremity to an armature. The armature is attached to a neutron absorber assembly by a series of shafts and connecting means. The armature is held in an uppermost position by an electromagnet assembly or by pressurized gas in a second embodiment. Deenergizing the electromagnet assembly, or venting the pressurized gas, causes the armature to fall by the force of gravity, thereby lowering the attached absorber assembly into the reactor core.

Golden, Martin P. (Penn Township, Allegheny County, PA); Govi, Aldo R. (Greensburg, PA)

1978-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Preliminary Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel From Shutdown Sites |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel From Shutdown Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel From Shutdown Sites Preliminary Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel From Shutdown Sites In January 2013, the Department of Energy issued the Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste. Among the elements contained in this strategy is an initial focus on accepting used nuclear fuel from shutdown reactor sites. This focus is consistent with the recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future, which identified removal of stranded used nuclear fuel at shutdown sites as a priority so that these sites may be completely decommissioned and put to other beneficial uses. Shutdown sites are defined as those commercial nuclear power reactor sites where the

91

Impact of the federal government shutdown on EIA - Today in ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

October 11, 2013 Impact of the federal government shutdown on EIA. As a result of the lapse in appropriations for the U.S. Energy Information ...

92

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 24, 2012 July 24, 2012 CX-009067: Categorical Exclusion Determination Deactivation and Decommissioning of the D-Area Detritiation Cells and Relocation of Associated Handi-Houses CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 24, 2012 CX-009066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of Downgradient Volatile Organic Compounds Plume and Installation of Monitoring Well CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 24, 2012 CX-009065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of Sentinel Wells ASB011B/011C for A-2 Air Stripper Shutdown CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

93

APS Long Range Operations Schedule  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Shutdown Planning Shutdown Planning Planning Templates Shutdown Planning Schedules: Current Shutdown Schedule Archives: 2006 - 2013 APS Long-Range Operations Schedule: 2014 Archives: 2013 | 2012 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 APS Long-Range Operations Schedule (Fiscal Year 2014) Alternate Formats: iCal | Excel | PDF APS Long-Range Operation Schedule 2013-3 2014-1 2014-2 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

94

Development of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Model for BWR Shutdown Modes 4 and 5 Integrated in SPAR Model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Nuclear plant operating experience and several studies show that the risk from shutdown operation during modes 4, 5, and 6 can be significant This paper describes development of the standard template risk evaluation models for shutdown modes 4, and 5 for commercial boiling water nuclear power plants (BWR). The shutdown probabilistic risk assessment model uses full power Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) model as the starting point for development. The shutdown PRA models are integrated with their respective internal events at-power SPAR model. This is accomplished by combining the modified system fault trees from SPAR full power model with shutdown event tree logic. For human reliability analysis (HRA), the SPAR HRA (SPAR-H) method is used which requires the analysts to complete relatively straight forward worksheet, including the performance shaping factors (PSFs). The results are then used to estimate HEP of interest. The preliminary results indicate the risk is dominated by the operator’s ability to diagnose the events and provide long term cooling.

S. T. Khericha; S. Sancakter; J. Mitman; J. Wood

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

95

Nuclear reactor shutdown control rod assembly  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A temperature responsive, self-actuated nuclear reactor shutdown control rod assembly 10. The upper end 18 of a lower drive line 17 fits within the lower end of an upper drive line 12. The lower end (not shown) of the lower drive line 17 is connected to a neutron absorber. During normal temperature conditions the lower drive line 17 is supported by detent means 22,26. When an overtemperature condition occurs thermal actuation means 34 urges ring 26 upwardly sufficiently to allow balls 22 to move radially outwardly thereby allowing lower drive line 17 to move downwardly toward the core of the nuclear reactor resulting in automatic reduction of the reactor powder.

Bilibin, Konstantin (North Hollywood, CA)

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

Self-actuating reactor shutdown system  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A control system for the automatic or self-actuated shutdown or "scram" of a nuclear reactor. The system is capable of initiating scram insertion by a signal from the plant protection system or by independent action directly sensing reactor conditions of low-flow or over-power. Self-actuation due to a loss of reactor coolant flow results from a decrease of pressure differential between the upper and lower ends of an absorber element. When the force due to this differential falls below the weight of the element, the element will fall by gravitational force to scram the reactor. Self-actuation due to high neutron flux is accomplished via a valve controlled by an electromagnet and a thermionic diode. In a reactor over-power, the diode will be heated to a change of state causing the electromagnet to be shorted thereby actuating the valve which provides the changed flow and pressure conditions required for scramming the absorber element.

Barrus, Donald M. (San Jose, CA); Brummond, Willian A (Livermore, CA); Peterson, Leslie F. (Danville, CA)

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

97

Cycle Chemistry Guidelines for Shutdown, Layup, and Startup of Combined Cycle Units with Heat Recovery Steam Generators  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Complete optimization of cycle chemistry in a combined-cycle unit requires more than proper selection and optimization of operating chemistry. Protection of the steam-water cycle also is essential during shutdown, layup, and startup phases. These guidelines consider protection of steam- and water-touched components at these times, consistent with the operating cycle chemistries in use.

2006-03-21T23:59:59.000Z

98

Short-Term Shutdown Guidance for Steam Turbine-Generators and Auxiliary Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides guidelines on the methods that utilities should consider to protect operating equipment when it is removed from service for short periods of time. The equipment and systems considered in this report include the steam turbine, generator, exciter, feedwater heaters, and related auxiliaries. The timeframe for this report includes outage periods from a weekend to six months. Improper layup can cause long-term equipment damage and premature failure. Increased shutdown frequency and durati...

2010-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

99

Microsoft Word - Val Team August-September 2009 shutdown.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

PSS Validation Schedule August/September 2009 Shutdown Shutdown Begins: August 21 st [ Friday ] Shutdown Ends: September 29 th at 08:00 [ Start of Machine Studies ] Monday Sept. 7 th - Lab Holiday Dates Beamline System Lead Validator Validator Responsible Team Week 1 [ 8/24 - 8/28 ] Mon. 8/24 - Wed. 8/26 2-BM PSS-Gen 1 Nguyen Boron Nguyen / Hogrefe Mon. 8/24 - Wed. 8/26 16-BM PSS-Gen 1 Banks Markovich Budz / Banks Tue. 8/25 - Thur. 8/27 17-ID PSS-Gen 1 Friedman Hawkins Friedman / Hawkins Tue. 8/25 - Thur. 8/27 21-ID PSS-Gen 3 McNamara Budz McNamara / Forrestal Week 2 [ 8/31 - 9/4 ] Mon. 8/31 - Wed. 9/2 2-ID PSS-Gen 1 Nguyen McNamara Nguyen / Hogrefe Tue. 9/1 - Thur. 9/3 6-ID PSS-Gen 1 Budz Banks Nguyen / Hogrefe Mon. 8/31 - Wed. 9/2 8-ID PSS-Gen 1 Friedman Gibson Gibson / Boron

100

DATE: TO:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

41 41 4 DATE: TO: September 2,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Procurement Data System Coding (FPDS) for Hurricane Gustav SUMMARY: An emergency declaration was made in preparation for Hurricane Gustav. The effective date for this declaration was August 29,2008. FPDS has been updated to include Hurricane Gustav as a choice in the data field "National Interest Action." When making an award to support the emergency, please ensure FPDS is properly coded. This Flash will be available online within a day, at the following website: http://www.rnananement.ener~y.~ov/policy guidance/policy flasheshtm. Questions concerning this policy flash should be

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

DATE: TO:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28 28 - DATE: TO: v POLICY FLASH 2008-28 February 19,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA41 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2008-06, Domestic and Foreign Procurement Preference Requirements SUMMARY: AL 2008-06 (attached) replaces AL 2002-06, dated 08/14/02, "Domestic and Foreign Procurement Preference Rules," which is hereby canceled. AL 2002-06 disseminated deviations to FAR provisions and clauses relating to foreign acquisition for use by Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and Power Marketing Administration (PMA) contracting activities. This new AL provides updated deviations to the FAR provisions and clauses for use by DOE,

102

TO: FILE DATE------  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DATE------ DATE------ la Fp7 ---------__ OWNER(.=) m-----z- Past: -----_------------------ Current: ------------i----------- Owner c:nntacted q ye' s y "0; !' L-----J if yea, date contacted TYPE OF OPERATION -------_------___ 0 Research & Development cl Facility Type 0 Production scale testins 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process E Theoretical Studies Sample SI Analysis [7 Manufacturing i University $ Resear.& Organization Government Sponsored Facility 0 Other -~------------------- 0 Production G Di spo5alfStorage TYPE OF CONTRACT ~------~--~~---- 0 Prime 0 Suhccntractnr 0 Purchase Order q Other information (i.e., crJst + fixed fee, unit price, time & material, etc) ------- ---------------------------- ~Canfrakt/Purchase Order # ----------------___---------

103

Neutron Science Facilities Operating Status | ORNL Neutron Sciences  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Neutron Science Facilities Operating Status High Flux Isotope Reactor The reactor is currently operating at 100% power for fuel cycle 449. Spallation Neutron Source SNS is shutdown...

104

Development of a Shutdown Qualitative Risk Assessment Standard  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents development of a shutdown qualitative risk assessment (QLRA) standard. This standard has been developed in support of Working Group ANS-58.22 of the Standards Committee of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) in conjunction with ongoing efforts to develop a standard for low power and shutdown (LPSD) probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs). This Technical Update will provide a starting point for review and comment by the ANS Working Group and other interested parties on the proposed qual...

2007-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

105

Diversion tanks will prevent field shutdown: design-build project is 80% alaskan  

SciTech Connect

The nation's second largest oil field is nearing peak production of 250,000 bbl per day. The Kuparuk River field on Alaska's North Slope put a second central processing facility (CPF-2) on line this year and a third will arrive on the 1986 sea lift. By 1990, the field will hold 400 producing wells and 400 water injection wells. Considering this investment, field operator Arco Alaska Inc., wanted to find a way to avoid costly field shutdowns that could be caused by oil-gas-water separation system problems or a temporary shutdown of the trans-Alaska pipeline or Alyeska terminal. The answer was a system of diversion tanks through which 220,000 bbl of crude could be kept circulating until problems could be corrected. The design and construction of these tanks are described.

Harris, M.

1985-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Thermionic switched self-actuating reactor shutdown system  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A self-actuating reactor shutdown system incorporating a thermionic switched electromagnetic latch arrangement which is responsive to reactor neutron flux changes and to reactor coolant temperature changes. The system is self-actuating in that the sensing thermionic device acts directly to release (scram) the control rod (absorber) without reference or signal from the main reactor plant protective and control systems. To be responsive to both temperature and neutron flux effects, two detectors are used, one responsive to reactor coolant temperatures, and the other responsive to reactor neutron flux increase. The detectors are incorporated into a thermionic diode connected electrically with an electromagnetic mechanism which under normal reactor operating conditions holds the the control rod in its ready position (exterior of the reactor core). Upon reaching either a specified temperature or neutron flux, the thermionic diode functions to short-circuit the electromagnetic mechanism causing same to lose its holding power and release the control rod, which drops into the reactor core region under gravitational force.

Barrus, Donald M. (San Jose, CA); Shires, Charles D. (San Jose, CA); Brummond, William A. (Livermore, CA)

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

107

Date Event  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Timeline of DOE's review of the Solyndra Loan Guarantee Application Timeline of DOE's review of the Solyndra Loan Guarantee Application Date Event 2005 Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program created (as part of EPAct 2005) Aug. 8, 2006 DOE issues solicitation seeking pre-applications for Title XVII loan guarantees Dec. 28, 2006 Solyndra submits pre-application, seeking funding for its Fab 1 manufacturing facility April - June 2007 DOE conducts financial and technical review of Solyndra pre-application Oct. 4, 2007 DOE invites Solyndra, and 15 other applicants, to submit full applications May 6, 2008 Company submits full application, seeking funding for its Fab 2 manufacturing facility. DOE begins due diligence. Sept. 4, 2008 DOE loan programs staff draft memorandum indicating that Solyndra was the "earliest mover" and may receive conditional commitment by January 16, 2009

108

Development of Passive Shutdown System for SFR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Technical Paper / Special Issue on the 2008 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants / Nuclear Plant Operations and Control

Shigeyuki Nakanishi; Takusaburo Hosoya; Shigenobu Kubo; Shoji Kotake; Misao Takamatsu; Takafumi Aoyama; Iwao Ikarimoto; Jungo Kato; Yoshio Shimakawa; Kiyoshi Harada

109

Date Published  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Abstract: The Integrated Waste Feed Delivery Plan (IWFDP) describes how waste feed will be delivered to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) to safely and efficiently accomplish the River Protection Project (RPP) mission. The IWFDP is integrated with the Baseline Case operating scenario documented in ORP-11242 (Rev. 6), River Protection Project System Plan. Volume 1 – Process Strategy (RPP-40149-VOL1) provides an overview of waste feed delivery (WFD) and describes how the WFD system will be used to prepare and deliver feed to the WTP based on the equipment configuration and functional capabilities of the WFD system. Volume 2 – Campaign Plan (RPP-40149-VOL2) describes the plans for the first eight campaigns for delivery to the WTP, evaluates projected feed for systematic issues, projects 242-A Evaporator campaigns, and evaluates double-shell tank (DST) space and availability of contingency feed. Volume 3 – Project Plan (RPP-40149-VOL3) identifies the scope and timing of the DST and infrastructure upgrade projects necessary to feed the WTP, and coordinates over 30 projectized projects and operational activities that comprise the needed WFD upgrades. Issues or project-specific risks, potential mitigating actions, and future refinements are also identified in each volume of the IWFDP.

E. B. West; P. J. Certa; T. M. Hohl; J. S. Ritari; B. R. Thompson; C. C. Haass; Key Words; P. J. Certa; T. M. Hohl; J. S. Ritari; B. R. Thompson; C. C. Haass

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

Staged venting of fuel cell system during rapid shutdown  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A venting methodology and system for rapid shutdown of a fuel cell apparatus of the type used in a vehicle propulsion system. H.sub.2 and air flows to the fuel cell stack are slowly bypassed to the combustor upon receipt of a rapid shutdown command. The bypass occurs over a period of time (for example one to five seconds) using conveniently-sized bypass valves. Upon receipt of the rapid shutdown command, the anode inlet of the fuel cell stack is instantaneously vented to a remote vent to remove all H.sub.2 from the stack. Airflow to the cathode inlet of the fuel cell stack gradually diminishes over the bypass period, and when the airflow bypass is complete the cathode inlet is also instantaneously vented to a remote vent to eliminate pressure differentials across the stack.

Clingerman, Bruce J. (Palmyra, NY); Doan, Tien M. (Columbia, MD); Keskula, Donald H. (Webster, NY)

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

MEMORANDUfl J: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

J: FILE DATE J: FILE DATE // //r /so -----------w------m FROM: 9. 34oyc -w--------v----- SUBJECT: D3 Bo;s CL&;C J mL-;+J; - Rcc cap 049 /'A :j$: &336;s L-.fh~ w-f L-1 ALE"nirTE __ ------------- --- ---_------------------ CITY: &u+M- - &. -w---v------ ---B-------w STATE: 0 h' -a---- OWNER(S) --pi::;- l>cl, b af.5 CA.-*>J CD Current: Gr;W i- ~U~&;P~ -------------,,' ,-,,,,-, Owner contacted 0 yes jg no; -------------------------- if yes, date contacted ------m------ TYPE OF OPERATION --w--w----------- & Research & Development a Facility Type 0 Production scale testing Cl Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies w Sample & Analysis 0 Manufacturing 0 University 0 Research Organization 0 Government Sponsored Facility

112

International Collaboration with the Shutdown of the BN-350 Reactor  

SciTech Connect

Representatives from the United States and the United Kingdom discussed areas where collaboration on the shutdown of the BN-350 Reactor in Aktau, Kazakhstan would benefit not only Kazakhstan, but would also help to assure the successful shutdown of the reactor. A fundamental understanding of the basis for collaboration has been for each side to ‘add value’ to each of the project areas, rather than simply substitute for each other’s experience. This approach has brought distinct technical and management benefits to the decommissioning activities in Kazakhstan.

J. A. Michelbacher; P.B. Wells; N. Organ; D. Wells

2005-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Requirements Analysis Study for Master Pump Shutdown System Project Development Specification [SEC 1 and 2  

SciTech Connect

This document has been updated during the definitive design portion of the first phase of the W-314 Project to capture additional software requirements and is planned to be updated during the second phase of the W-314 Project to cover the second phase of the Project's scope. The objective is to provide requirement traceability by recording the analysis/basis for the functional descriptions of the master pump shutdown system. This document identifies the sources of the requirements and/or how these were derived. Each requirement is validated either by quoting the source or an analysis process involving the required functionality, performance characteristics, operations input or engineering judgment.

BEVINS, R.R.

2000-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

114

A safety and regulatory assessment of generic BWR and PWR permanently shutdown nuclear power plants  

SciTech Connect

The long-term availability of less expensive power and the increasing plant modification and maintenance costs have caused some utilities to re-examine the economics of nuclear power. As a result, several utilities have opted to permanently shutdown their plants. Each licensee of these permanently shutdown (PSD) plants has submitted plant-specific exemption requests for those regulations that they believe are no longer applicable to their facility. This report presents a regulatory assessment for generic BWR and PWR plants that have permanently ceased operation in support of NRC rulemaking activities in this area. After the reactor vessel is defueled, the traditional accident sequences that dominate the operating plant risk are no longer applicable. The remaining source of public risk is associated with the accidents that involve the spent fuel. Previous studies have indicated that complete spent fuel pool drainage is an accident of potential concern. Certain combinations of spent fuel storage configurations and decay times, could cause freshly discharged fuel assemblies to self heat to a temperature where the self sustained oxidation of the zircaloy fuel cladding may cause cladding failure. This study has defined four spent fuel configurations which encompass all of the anticipated spent fuel characteristics and storage modes following permanent shutdown. A representative accident sequence was chosen for each configuration. Consequence analyses were performed using these sequences to estimate onsite and boundary doses, population doses and economic costs. A list of candidate regulations was identified from a screening of 10 CFR Parts 0 to 199. The continued applicability of each regulation was assessed within the context of each spent fuel storage configuration and the results of the consequence analyses.

Travis, R.J.; Davis, R.E.; Grove, E.J.; Azarm, M.A. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Evaluation of potential severe accidents during low power and shutdown operations at Grand Gulf, Unit 1: Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events for Plant Operational State 5 during a refueling outage. Volume 2, Part 3: Internal Events Appendices I and J  

SciTech Connect

This report provides supporting documentation for various tasks associated with the performance of the probablistic risk assessment for Plant Operational State 5 during a refueling outage at Grand Gulf, Unit 1 as documented in Volume 2, Part 1 of NUREG/CR-6143.

Yakle, J. [Science Applications International Corp., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Darby, J. [Science and Engineering Associates, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Whitehead, D.; Staple, B. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

Summary of Information Presented at an NRC-Sponsored Low-Power Shutdown Public Workshop, April 27, 1999, Rockville, Maryland  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report summarizes a public workshop that was held on April 27, 1999, in Rockville, Maryland. The workshop was conducted as part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) efforts to further develop its understanding of the risks associated with low power and shutdown operations at US nuclear power plants. A sufficient understanding of such risks is required to support decision-making for risk-informed regulation, in particular Regulatory Guide 1.174, and the development of a consensus standard. During the workshop the NRC staff discussed and requested feedback from the public (including representatives of the nuclear industry, state governments, consultants, private industry, and the media) on the risk associated with low-power and shutdown operations.

Wheeler, Timothy A.; Whitehead, Donnie W.; Lois, Erasmia

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

BUDGET KEY DATES  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

BUDGET KEY DATES. For Immediate Release: December 15, 2009. Contact: Diane Belford 301-975-8400. Budget Key Dates.

2013-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

118

TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

tlEi?ORANDUH tlEi?ORANDUH TO: FILE DATE FFtOil: c ----'- Y '%d 6- ----_----_ SUBJECT: SITE NAME: ----------STATE: Owner contacted 0 yes qno; if yes, date contacted ---------__-- TYPE OF OPERATION ----~_--_--~----_ &Research & Development @ Praduction scale testing. 0 Pilat Scale 0 Bench Scale Process a Theoretical Studies 0 Sample & Analysis tin Facility Type R Manufacturing IJ University 0 Research Organization IJ Gavernment Sponsored Facility 0 Other ----------------' --~- 0 Production E Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRACT ~~_-~--_---_--__ P Prime 0 I Cl Subcontractor Other information (i.e., cost K Purchase Order jZM pati !& MC4 + fixed fee, unit price, time 81 material, etc) ---------------------_----~-- OWNERSHIP: AEC/MED AEC/MED GOVT GOVT

119

HEMORANDUH TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

HEMORANDUH HEMORANDUH TO: FILE DATE 1123 lLjl ---WV-------------- FROM: P. s&w+ -------v-----s-- SUBJECT: lJ+ - e;& SITE NAME: LJo"zL - /L,' de Cd -J--h=- ALTERNATE l --e-e-- ------w------- ---,,,' ,m--, NAME: ---------------------- CITY: LL-pL~ ------------ ------------- STATE3 e--w-- OWNER tS) -----w-- Past I --k-!!.l~ -pa L . -v-----w------- Current: Owner contac?-ed 0 yes 0 no; if yes, I+Lff A zid;&m - -------------------------- date contacted ------B--m--- TYPE OF OPERATION ----------------- a Research 81 Development a Facility Type 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Procesr 0 Theoretical Studies 0 Sample & Analysis m Manuf acturinq 0 University 0 Research Organization 0 Government Sponrored Facility 0 Other

120

Risk contribution from low power and shutdown of a pressurized water reactor  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During 1989 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) initiated an extensive program to carefully examine the potential risks during low power and shutdown operations. Two plants, Surry (a pressurized water reactor) and Grand Gulf (a boiling water reactor), were selected for study by Brookhaven National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, respectively. The program objectives included assessing the risks of severe accidents initiated during plant operational states other than full power operation and comparing estimated core damage frequencies, important accident sequences, and other qualitative and quantitative results with full power accidents as assessed in NUREG-1150. The scope included a Level 3 PRA for traditional internal events and a Level 1 PRA on fire, flooding, and seismically induced core damage sequences. 12 refs., 7 tabs.

Chu, T.L.; Pratt, W.T.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Date | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Properties of type "Date" Properties of type "Date" Showing 47 properties using this type. A Property:ASHRAE 169 End Date Property:ASHRAE 169 Start Date B Property:Building/EndPeriod Property:Building/StartPeriod Property:Building/YearConstruction Property:Building/YearConstruction1 Property:Building/YearConstruction2 Property:Buildings/ModelYear Property:Buildings/PublicationYear C Property:CommercialOnlineDate D Property:DSIRE/LstUpdt E Property:EndDate Property:EndYear Property:EnergyAccessYearInitiated Property:Event/Date Property:ExpActivityDate E cont. Property:ExpActivityDateEnd F Property:File/CreationDate Property:FirstWellDate G Property:GEAReportDate Property:Geothermal/FY Property:Geothermal/ProjectEndDate Property:Geothermal/ProjectStartDate H Property:HPBD/DateOfOccupancy I Property:Incentive/DsireLstSubModSummaryUpdt

122

Natural Convection Shutdown Heat Removal Test Facility (NSTF)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Natural Convection Natural Convection Shutdown Heat Removal Test Facility Scaling Basis Full Scale Half Scale NSTF Argonne National Laboratory's Natural Convection Shutdown Heat Removal Test Facility (NSTF) - one of the world's largest facilities for ex-vessel passive decay heat removal testing-confirms the performance of reactor cavity cooling systems (RCCS) and similar passive confinement or containment decay heat removal systems in modern Small Modular Reactors. Originally built to aid in the development of General Electric's Power Reactor Innovative Small Module (PRISM) Reactor Vessel Auxiliary Cooling System (RVACS), the NSTF has a long history of providing confirmatory data for the airside of the RVACS. Argonne National Laboratory's NSTF is a state-of-the-art, large-scale facility for evaluating performance

123

J DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ICY FLASH 2010-5- - ICY FLASH 2010-5- - J DATE: TO: FROM: June 10,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 13 Policy and Operating Procedures for Use of the GSA Smartpay2 Purchase Card SUMMARY: Attached for your information is an updated and revised copy of DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 13, Purchase Card Policy and Operating Procedures. This Flash and its attachment will be posted online, at the following website: http:llwww.mananement.enerliy.gov/~olicy guidance/policy flashes.htm. Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Denise Clarke at (202) 287-1 748 or DeniseT.Clarke@,hq.doe.~ov . Director Office of Procurement and

124

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Gulf of Mexico 3-Dimensional Operational Ocean Forecast System Pilot Project (Portland) CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 03012010 Location(s):...

125

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Gulf of Mexico 3-Dimensional Operational Ocean Forecast System Pilot Project (Los Angeles) CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 03012010 Location(s):...

126

PKL experiments on loss of residual heat removal under shutdown conditions in PWRS  

SciTech Connect

When a pressurized water reactor (PWR) is shutdown for refueling, the main coolant inventory is reduced so that the level is at mid-loop elevation. Removal of the decay heat from the core is maintained by the residual heat removal system (RHRS), which under these conditions represents the only heat sink. Loss of RHRS under shutdown conditions has occurred several times worldwide and still plays an important role in risk studies for PWRs. The experimental investigation on loss of RHRS is one mayor topic in the current PKL test program which is included in an international project set up by the OECD. PKL is an integral test facility simulating a typical western-type 1300 MW PWR and is used to investigate the thermal-hydraulic system behavior of PWRs under accident situations. The PKL test facility is operated in the Technical Center of Framatome ANP in Erlangen, Germany. The tests on loss of RHRS have been performed with borated water and special measurement techniques for the determination of the boron concentration (online measurements). The PKL tests demonstrate that, as long as the primary circuit is closed, a failure of the residual heat removal system can be compensated by one or more steam generators, which remain filled with water on the secondary side and stay ready for use during refueling and other outages. However, the tests showed also that accumulations of large condensate inventories (with low boron concentration) can occur in the cold leg piping during mid-loop operation after loss of the RHRS. This paper summarizes the most important results of a PKL experiment dealing with loss of RHRS during mid-loop operation with closed primary circuit. Issues still open and needs for further investigations are also discussed. (authors)

Umminger, Klaus; Schoen, Bernhard; Mull, Thomas [Framatome ANP GmbH, Freyeslebenstrasse 1, 91058 Erlangen (Germany)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Loss of benefits resulting from mandated nuclear plant shutdowns  

SciTech Connect

This paper identifies and discusses some of the important consequences of nuclear power plant unavailability, and quantifies a number of technical measures of loss of benefits that result from regulatory actions such as licensing delays and mandated nuclear plant outages. The loss of benefits that accompany such regulatory actions include increased costs of systems generation, increased demand for nonnuclear and often scarce fuels, and reduced system reliability. This paper is based on a series of case studies, supplemented by sensitivity studies, on hypothetical nuclear plant shutdowns. These studies were developed by Argonne in cooperation with four electric utilities.

Peerenboom, J.P.; Buehring, W.A.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

/I // /s 3 /I // /s 3 ------------------- FROM: D. I&+ ---------------- SUBJECT: 5;le r 3-&-F.. SITE /+yNJs l3 ALTERNATE NAME: -w---- -SF ------------------------------ NAME: CITY: c ;A< ;,+,ZJ+ ------------,-L-----,,,,,, STATE: OH --w-w- OWNER(S) -w---s-- past: /" ' A--F5 ---w-m- -e----v-------- Current: 0~. A-+A.~~ -------------------------- Owner contacted 0 yes 0 no; if yes, date contacted ------------- TYPE OF OPERATION -------e--------w 0 Research & Development 0 Facility Type 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies 0 Sample 84 Analysis x Manufacturing 0 University 0 Research Organization 0 Government Sponsored Facility 0 Other --------------------- B Production 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRACT

129

MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

-.. -.. 37qg: MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE =b-- FROM: ---L- _------__ u . SUBJECT: SITE ACl= ALTERNATE NAME: -_______-~-----------------NA~E:__( CITY:--~---------_-STATE:-~~ (2 OWNE!sI_SL f Past- L&cl= w ------------------- ----- Current- w buL.r - ------------ ownq cm-ltacted 0 yes @ "no; if yes, data cnntacte TYPE OF OPERATION -------------_~-~ q Research & Development 0 Production %.cale testing 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies 0 Sample 84 Analysis 0 Production i2 Disposal/Storage 0 Facility T 0 Hanufac 0 Univerrj 0 .R esearc 0 Governm 14 Other 1 I lil IrJ y,/3 Prime 0 Other infcrkion Subcwkractbr (i.e., ?bst + fixed fee! &nit price, Cl Purchase Order time & mate

130

MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

5/22/w 5/22/w ------..------------- FROM: D- f&u+ ---------------- SUBJECT: E/;-+&o.. ReC*-C.AB&;O* +L /z&J; &DC,, /Ptrr; CLonr z-r. SITE NAME: _ ALTERNATE ----------WV-- --------------------- NAME: EAT ---- ------------------ CAY: r-led 4' or k -------------------------- STATE: ti Y VW---- OWNER tS) -------- Past: ---Cl&zt.t.r-----~-~- ---- =urr=nt: ti& LPdA Owner cnntacted 0 yes mo; i+ ye8, -------------------------- date contacted ------------- TYPE OF OPERATION ----------------- w Research & Development E3 Facility Type 0 Production scale testing Cl Pilot Scale a Bench Scale Process B Theoretical Studies 0 Sample & Analysis 0 Manufacturing 0 University @ Research Organization 0 Government Sponsored Facility 17 Other

131

Requirements Analysis Study for Master Pump Shutdown System Project Development Specification [SEC 1 and 2  

SciTech Connect

This study is a requirements document that presents analysis for the functional description for the master pump shutdown system. This document identifies the sources of the requirements and/or how these were derived. Each requirement is validated either by quoting the source or an analysis process involving the required functionality, performance characteristics, operations input or engineering judgment. The requirements in this study apply to the first phase of the W314 Project. This document has been updated during the definitive design portion of the first phase of the W314 Project to capture additional software requirements and is planned to be updated during the second phase of the W314 Project to cover the second phase of the project's scope.

BEVINS, R.R.

2000-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

132

Replacement energy, capacity, and reliability costs for permanent nuclear reactor shutdowns  

SciTech Connect

Average replacement power costs are estimated for potential permanent shutdowns of nuclear electricity-generating units. Replacement power costs are considered to include replacement energy, capacity, and reliability cost components. These estimates were developed to assist the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission in evaluating regulatory issues that potentially affect changes in serious reactor accident frequencies. Cost estimates were derived from long-term production-cost and capacity expansion simulations of pooled utility-system operations. Factors that affect replacement power cost, such as load growth, replacement sources of generation, and capital costs for replacement capacity, were treated in the analysis. Costs are presented for a representative reactor and for selected subcategories of reactors, based on estimates for 112 individual reactors.

VanKuiken, J.C., Buehring, W.A.; Hamilton, S.; Kavicky, J.A.; Cavallo, J.D.; Veselka, T.D.; Willing, D.L. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

MEMORANDUM I TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM I TO: FILE DATE -----_-_- FaOM: ~~,~hkcid!,~- ' ALTERNATE CITY: I\ptw)a.yk --~---_--___-~--~---______ STATE: I current: ------------_------_-~~~~~ if yes, date contacted ____ TYPE OF OPERATION -_---_---------__ 0 Research & Development 6 Facility Type 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilat Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies Sample $ rraductian & Analysis a Manufacturing I 0 University I (1 Research Organization 0 Government Sponao&ed Facility 0 Cither I ----e------y-------- 0 Disposal/Storage TYPE OF CONTRACT --~_----~__~~~-- ' 0 Prime q Subcontract& q Purchase Order cl Other informatian (i.e., cost + fixed fee, unit pri'ce, time & material, qtc) ------- --------------------~------ Contract/Purchase Order #

135

EA-0993: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

93: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, 93: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington EA-0993: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site's proposal to place the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) in a radiologically and industrially safe shutdown condition, suitable for a long-term surveillance and maintenance phase prior to final decontamination and decommissioning. This EA addresses the actions associated with Phase I (Facility Transition) and Phase II (Surveillance and Maintenance). PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD May 1, 1995 EA-0993: Finding of No Significant Impact Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility

136

FUNDAMENTALS IN THE OPERATION OF NUCLEAR TEST REACTORS. VOLUME 2. MATERIALS TESTING REACTOR DESIGN AND OPERATION  

SciTech Connect

The reactor components, building, control system and circuitry, and experimental and handling facilities are described and discussed, together with operation, shutdown, tank work and supplemental facilities. Training questions and answers are included. (D.C.W.)

1963-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

Preliminary Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel From Nine Shutdown Sites  

SciTech Connect

he Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future identified removal of stranded used nuclear fuel at shutdown sites as a priority so that these sites may be completely decommissioned and put to other beneficial uses. In this report, a preliminary evaluation of removing used nuclear fuel from nine shutdown sites was conducted. The shutdown sites included Maine Yankee, Yankee Rowe, Connecticut Yankee, Humboldt Bay, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Trojan, La Crosse, and Zion. At these sites a total of 7649 used nuclear fuel assemblies and a total of 2813.2 metric tons heavy metal (MTHM) of used nuclear fuel are contained in 248 storage canisters. In addition, 11 canisters containing greater-than-Class C (GTCC) low-level radioactive waste are stored at these sites. The evaluation was divided in four components: • characterization of the used nuclear fuel and GTCC low-level radioactive waste inventory at the shutdown sites • an evaluation of the onsite transportation conditions at the shutdown sites • an evaluation of the near-site transportation infrastructure and experience relevant to the shipping of transportation casks containing used nuclear fuel from the shutdown sites • an evaluation of the actions necessary to prepare for and remove used nuclear fuel and GTCC low-level radioactive waste from the shutdown sites. Using these evaluations the authors developed time sequences of activities and time durations for removing the used nuclear fuel and GTCC low-level radioactive waste from a single shutdown site, from three shutdown sites located close to each other, and from all nine shutdown sites.

Maheras, Steven J.; Best, Ralph; Ross, Steven B.; Buxton, Kenneth A.; England, Jeffery L.; McConnell, Paul

2013-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

140

Office of Inspector General report on audit of shutdown and transition of the Mound Plant  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

With the end of the Cold War, the Department of Energy (Department) has greatly reduced the production of nuclear weapons and redirected the capabilities and focus of the weapons complex. As part of this redirection, the Mound Plant was transferred from a Defense Program site to an Environmental Management site with emphasis on accelerated cleanup and transition of facilities and personal property to the local community. This audit was initiated to determine if the shutdown and transition of the Mound Plant was progressing effectively and efficiently. The Department prepared a Nonnuclear Consolidation Plan (NCP) designed to reduce its costs of operation by closing and consolidating facilities. In contrast to the goal of the NCP, the Department plans to keep a portion of the Mound Plant open solely to perform work for other Federal agencies. Specifically, the Department has decided to continue assembling and testing isotopic heat sources and radioisotope thermoelectric generators (HS/RTG) at the Mound Plant despite the transfer or planned transfer of all other production operations.The Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology decided to continue its HS/RTG operations at the Mound Plant without adequately considering the overall economic goals of the Department. As a result, the Department may not achieve the savings envisioned by the NCP. Also, the Department may incur between $4 million and $8.5 million more than necessary each year to continue its HS/RTG operations at the Mound Plant. Additionally, if the HS/RTG operations stay at the Mound Plant, the Department will spend more than $3 million to consolidate these operations into one location.

NONE

1997-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Self-actuating reactor-shutdown system. [LMFBR  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A control system for the automatic or self-actuated shutdown or scram of a nuclear reactor is described. The system is capable of initiating scram insertion by a signal from the plant protection system or by independent action directly sensing reactor conditions of low-flow or over-power. Self-actuation due to a loss of reactor coolant flow results from a decrease of pressure differential between the upper and lower ends of an absorber element. When the force due to this differential falls below the weight of the element, the element will fall by gravitational force to scram the reactor. Self-actuation due to high neutron flux is accomplished via a valve controlled by an electromagnet and a thermionic diode. In a reactor over-power, the diode will be heated to a change of state causing the electromagnet to be shorted thereby actuating the valve which provides the changed flow and pressure conditions required for scramming the absorber element.

Barrus, D.M.; Brummond, W.A.; Peterson, L.F.

1981-06-04T23:59:59.000Z

142

Advanced wind turbine with lift cancelling aileron for shutdown  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

An advanced aileron configuration for wind turbine rotors featuring an independent, lift generating aileron connected to the rotor blade. The aileron has an airfoil profile which is inverted relative to the airfoil profile of the main section of the rotor blade. The inverted airfoil profile of the aileron allows the aileron to be used for strong positive control of the rotation of the rotor while deflected to angles within a control range of angles. The aileron functions as a separate, lift generating body when deflected to angles within a shutdown range of angles, generating lift with a component acting in the direction opposite the direction of rotation of the rotor. Thus, the aileron can be used to shut down rotation of the rotor. The profile of the aileron further allows the center of rotation to be located within the envelope of the aileron, at or near the centers of pressure and mass of the aileron. The location of the center of rotation optimizes aerodynamically and gyroscopically induced hinge moments and provides a fail safe configuration.

Coleman, Clint (Warren, VT); Juengst, Theresa M. (Warren, VT); Zuteck, Michael D. (Kemah, TX)

1996-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

143

Advanced wind turbine with lift-destroying aileron for shutdown  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

An advanced aileron configuration for wind turbine rotors featuring an aileron with a bottom surface that slopes upwardly at an angle toward the nose region of the aileron. The aileron rotates about a center of rotation which is located within the envelope of the aileron, but does not protrude substantially into the air flowing past the aileron while the aileron is deflected to angles within a control range of angles. This allows for strong positive control of the rotation of the rotor. When the aileron is rotated to angles within a shutdown range of deflection angles, lift-destroying, turbulence-producing cross-flow of air through a flow gap, and turbulence created by the aileron, create sufficient drag to stop rotation of the rotor assembly. The profile of the aileron further allows the center of rotation to be located within the envelope of the aileron, at or near the centers of pressure and mass of the aileron. The location of the center of rotation optimizes aerodynamically and gyroscopically induced hinge moments and provides a fail safe configuration.

Coleman, Clint (Warren, VT); Juengst, Theresa M. (Warren, VT); Zuteck, Michael D. (Kemah, TX)

1996-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

144

Global Teleconnections in Response to a Shutdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The global response to a shutdown of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is investigated by conducting a water-hosing experiment with a coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation model. In the model, the addition of ...

Lixin Wu; Chun Li; Chunxue Yang; Shang-Ping Xie

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

Status of the Surry low power and shutdown PRA (probabilistic risk analysis)  

SciTech Connect

The Surry low power and shutdown probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) is an ongoing project at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) to identify and quantify potential accident scenarios that may occur in a pressurized water reactor (PWR) during low power and shutdown. It was initiated as a result of various incidents and accidents that have occurred within the United States and overseas. The project involves review and evaluation of PWR experience at shutdown, identification of accident scenarios, determination of methods to mitigate the accidents, and performance a level 1 PRA. An evaluation of accident progression, source terms, and consequences has also been initiated. The results will be used to address issues related to shutdown conditions. The objective of this paper is to provide a progress report on the project, and to present the approach used as well as preliminary results of the ongoing and completed tasks. 14 refs., 1 fig., 5 tabs.

Chu, T-L.; Luckas, W.; Musicki, Z.; Fitzpatrick, R.G.

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power plant on ambient...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power plant on ambient mercury species Yungang Wang 1 , Jiaoyan Huang 2,a , Philip K. Hopke 3,* , Oliver V. Rattigan 4 , David C....

147

Benefits of actinide-only burnup credit for shutdown PWRs  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Owners of PWRs that are shutdown prior to resolution of interim storage or permanent disposal issues have to make difficult decisions on what to do with their spent fuel. Maine Yankee is currently evaluating multiple options for spent fuel storage. Their spent fuel pool has 1,434 assemblies. In order to evaluate the value to a utility of actinide-only burnup credit, analysis of the number of canisters required with and without burnup credit was made. In order to perform the analysis, loading curves were developed for the Holtec Hi-Star 100/MPC-32. The MPC-32 is hoped to be representative of future burnup credit designs from many vendors. The loading curves were generated using the actinide-only burnup credit currently under NRC review. The canister was analyzed for full loading (32 assemblies) and with partial loadings of 30 and 28 assemblies. If no burnup credit is used the maximum capacity was assumed to be 24 assemblies. this reduced capacity is due to the space required for flux traps which are needed to sufficiently reduce the canister reactivity for the fresh fuel assumption. Without burnup credit the 1,343 assemblies would require 60 canisters. If all the fuel could be loaded into the 32 assembly canisters only 45 canisters would be required. Although the actinide-only burnup credit approach is very conservative, the total number of canisters required is only 47 which is only two short of the minimum possible number of canisters. The utility is expected to buy the canister and the storage overpack. A reasonable cost estimate for the canister plus overpack is $500,000. Actinide-only burnup credit would save 13 canisters and overpacks which is a savings of about $6.5 million. This savings is somewhat reduced since burnup credit requires a verification measurement of burnup. The measurement costs for these assemblies can be estimated as about $1 million. The net savings would be $5.5 million.

Lancaster, D.; Fuentes, E.; Kang, C. [TRW Environmental Safety Systems, INc., Las Vegas, NV (United States); Rivard, D. [Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co., Westboro, MA (United States)

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

BWRVIP-225: BWR Vessel and Internals Project, BWR Shutdown and Startup Chemistry Experience and Application Sourcebook  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

All U.S. BWRs apply hydrogen water chemistry (HWC) and the majority of BWRs implement noble metals addition in the form of a noble metal chemical application (NMCA) or an On-Line NobleChemTM (OLNC) to protect against intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC). This report, prepared by an industry focus group, summarizes recent plant experience in shutdown and startup chemistry control. The overall goals are to minimize activity transport during shutdown evolutions, avoid increasing outage duration, ...

2009-12-11T23:59:59.000Z

149

Preliminary results of the PWR low power and shutdown accident frequencies program: Coarse screening analysis for Surry  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document presents the preliminary internal events Level 1 results (including fire and flood) obtained as a result of a coarse screening analysis on the low power and shutdown accident frequencies of the Surry Nuclear Power Plant. The work was performed by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES). This coarse screening analysis was performed in support of the NRC staff's follow-up actions subsequent to the March 20, 1990 Vogtle incident with the objective of providing high-level qualitative insights within a relatively short time frame. It is the first phase of a major study that will ultimately produce estimates on the core damage frequency of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) during low power and shutdown conditions. Phase 2 of the study will be guided by the Phase 1 results in order to concentrate the effort on the various plant operational states, the dominant accident sequences, and pertinent data items according to their importance to core damage frequency and risk.

Chu, T.L.; Musicki, Z.; Luckas, W.; Wong, S.M.; Neymotin, L.; Diamond, D.J.; Hsu, C.J.; Bozoki, G.; Kohut, P.; Fitzpatrick, R. (Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)); Siu, N. (Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Cambridge, MA (United States))

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

Preliminary results of the PWR low power and shutdown accident frequencies program: Coarse screening analysis for Surry  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document presents the preliminary internal events Level 1 results (including fire and flood) obtained as a result of a coarse screening analysis on the low power and shutdown accident frequencies of the Surry Nuclear Power Plant. The work was performed by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES). This coarse screening analysis was performed in support of the NRC staff`s follow-up actions subsequent to the March 20, 1990 Vogtle incident with the objective of providing high-level qualitative insights within a relatively short time frame. It is the first phase of a major study that will ultimately produce estimates on the core damage frequency of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) during low power and shutdown conditions. Phase 2 of the study will be guided by the Phase 1 results in order to concentrate the effort on the various plant operational states, the dominant accident sequences, and pertinent data items according to their importance to core damage frequency and risk.

Chu, T.L.; Musicki, Z.; Luckas, W.; Wong, S.M.; Neymotin, L.; Diamond, D.J.; Hsu, C.J.; Bozoki, G.; Kohut, P.; Fitzpatrick, R. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Siu, N. [Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Cambridge, MA (United States)

1991-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

151

OTS NOTE DATE: TO: FROM:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TO: FROM: March 25, 1991 A. Williams D. stout P SUBJECT: Elimination Recommendation for the Star Cutter Corporation The .attached memorandum and supporting documents are the basis for our recommendation to eliminate the former Star Cutter Corporation site from further consideration under FUSRAP. The site is located in Farmington Hills, Michigan. Documents discovered to date which indicate use or handling of radioactive material by Star Cutter consist of two Analytical Data Sheets, dated June 29, 1956, prepared by the National Lead Company of Ohio (NLO), an Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) prime contractor. The data sheets report the results of radiological monitoring conducted during operation of an oil- cooled drilling/hollowing machine. The sheets record measurements during

152

Current status of experimental breeder reactor-II [EBR-II] shutdown planning  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Experimental Breeder Reactor--II (EBR-II) at Argonne National Laboratory--West (ANL-W) in Idaho, was shutdown in September, 1994 as mandated by the US Department of Energy. This sodium cooled reactor had been in service since 1964, and was to be placed in an industrially and radiologically safe condition for ultimate decommissioning. The deactivation of a liquid metal reactor presents unique concerns. The first major task associated with the project was the removal of all fueled assemblies. In addition, sodium must be drained from systems and processed for ultimate disposal. Residual quantities of sodium remaining in systems must be deactivated or inerted to preclude future hazards associated with pyrophoricity and generation of potentially explosive hydrogen gas. A Sodium Process Facility was designed and constructed to react the elemental sodium from the EBR-II primary and secondary systems to sodium hydroxide for disposal. This facility has a design capacity to allow the reaction of the complete inventory of sodium at ANL-W in less than two years. Additional quantities of sodium from the Fermi-1 reactor are also being treated at the Sodium Process Facility. The sodium environment and the EBR-II configuration, combined with the radiation and contamination associated with thirty years of reactor operation, posed problems specific to liquid metal reactor deactivation. The methods being developed and implemented at EBR-II can be applied to other similar situations in the US and abroad.

McDermott, M. D.; Griffin, C. D.; Michelbacher, J. A.; Earle, O. K.

2000-05-08T23:59:59.000Z

153

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

d d POLICY FLASH 2010-64 DATE: TO: FROM: July 7,201 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 I Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-42 SUMMARY: Attached for your information is a summary of Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-42 which makes changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The FAC has eleven rules (seven final and four interim) and one technical amendment. Attached is a short overview of the rules to include its effective date and applicability date. To view FAC 2005-42 go to the Federal Register Browse web link at http://www.~~oaccess.~ov/fr/browse.html and search for the Federal Register Volume 75, Number 115 for Wednesday, June 16,2010.

154

History of Radiocarbon Dating  

DOE R&D Accomplishments (OSTI)

The development is traced of radiocarbon dating from its birth in curiosity regarding the effects of cosmic radiation on Earth. Discussed in historical perspective are: the significance of the initial measurements in determining the course of developments; the advent of the low-level counting technique; attempts to avoid low-level counting by the use of isotopic enrichment; the gradual appearance of the environmental effect due to the combustion of fossil fuel (Suess effect); recognition of the atmosphere ocean barrier for carbon dioxide exchange; detailed understanding of the mixing mechanism from the study of fallout radiocarbon; determination of the new half-life; indexing and the assimilation problem for the massive accumulation of dates; and the proliferation of measurement techniques and the impact of archaeological insight on the validity of radiocarbon dates. (author)

Libby, W. F.

1967-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

155

Self-actuated nuclear reactor shutdown system using induction pump to facilitate sensing of core coolant temperature  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A self-actuated shutdown system incorporated into a reactivity control assembly in a nuclear reactor includes pumping means for creating an auxiliary downward flow of a portion of the heated coolant exiting from the fuel assemblies disposed adjacent to the control assembly. The shutdown system includes a hollow tubular member which extends through the outlet of the control assembly top nozzle so as to define an outer annular flow channel through the top nozzle outlet separate from an inner flow channel for primary coolant flow through the control assembly. Also, a latching mechanism is disposed in an inner duct of the control assembly and is operable for holding absorber bundles in a raised position in the control assembly and for releasing them to drop them into the core of the reactor for shutdown purposes. The latching mechanism has an inner flow passage extending between and in flow communication with the absorber bundles and the inner flow channel of the top nozzle for accommodating primary coolant flow upwardly through the control assembly. Also, an outer flow passage separate from the inner flow passage extends through the latching mechanism between and in flow communication with the inner duct and the outer flow channel of the top nozzle for accommodating inflow of a portion of the heated coolant from the adjacent fuel assemblies. The latching mechanism contains a magnetic material sensitive to temperature and operable to cause mating or latching together of the components of the latching mechanism when the temperature sensed is below a known temperature and unmating or unlatching thereof when the temperature sensed is above a given temperature. The temperature sensitive magnetic material is positioned in communication with the heated coolant flow through the outer flow passage for directly sensing the temperature thereof. Finally, the pumping means includes a jet induction pump nozzle and diffuser disposed adjacent the bottom nozzle of the control assembly and in flow communication with the inlet thereof. The pump nozzle is operable to create an upward driving flow of primary coolant through the pump diffuser and then to the absorber bundles. The upward driving flow of primary coolant, in turn, creates a suction head within the outer flow channel of the top nozzle and thereby an auxiliary downward flow of the heated coolant portion exiting from the upper end of the adjacent fuel assemblies through the outer flow channel to the pump nozzle via the outer flow passage of the latching mechanism and an annular space between the outer and inner spaced ducts of the control assembly housing. The temperature of the heated coolant exiting from the adjacent fuel assemblies can thereby be sensed directly by the temperature sensitive magnetic material in the latching mechanism.

Sievers, Robert K. (N. Huntingdon, PA); Cooper, Martin H. (Churchill, PA); Tupper, Robert B. (Greensburg, PA)

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

156

Quantum Dating Market  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We consider the dating market decision problem under the quantum mechanics point of view. Quantum states whose associated amplitudes are modified by men strategies are used to represent women. Grover quantum search algorithm is used as a playing strategy. Success is more frequently obtained by playing quantum than playing classic.

O. G. Zabaleta; C. M. Arizmendi

2010-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

157

Date: _______________ Vendor Name: _______________________________  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: ________________________ City, State, Zip:_______________________ Phone # : __________________ Fax, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance e. ___ Fire Safety-Extinguishing Systems, Bldg. Security Alarm Systems on ReX Released Re-released Faxed to Purchasing Date Initials 6-15-11 REV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Fabrikant, Sara Irina

158

Executive Director for Operations /RA/ SUBJECT: PROPOSED RULEMAKING—POST-FIRE OPERATOR MANUAL ACTIONS (RIN 3150  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

To obtain Commission approval to publish the proposed rule, including the issue of the need for an interim enforcement discretion policy and make available the draft regulatory guide and other supporting documents for public comment. BACKGROUND: In SECY-03-0100, “Rulemaking Plan on Post-Fire Operator Manual Actions, ” dated June 17, 2003, the staff recommended revising the existing fire protection regulation in paragraph III.G.2 of Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50 to include operator manual actions. These actions are needed to ensure that a redundant train of systems necessary to achieve and maintain hot shutdown conditions located within the same area outside the primary containment is free of fire damage. In an SRM dated September 12, 2003, the Commission approved the staff’s recommendation to revise the fire protection program requirements in Appendix R and the associated guidance. The Commission also approved the staff’s plan to develop an interim enforcement policy to deal with compliance issues until the guidance and final rule are implemented. CONTACT:

Luis A. Reyes; David Diec Nrr/drip

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

Release Date: August 2010 Next Release Date: August 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Release Date: August 2010 Next Release Date: August 2011 U.S. Energy Information Administration/Renewable Energy Annual 2008 Table 1.14 Total Biomass Electricity Net ...

160

Technical Specification action statements requiring shutdown. A risk perspective with application to the RHR/SSW systems of a BWR  

SciTech Connect

When safety systems fail during power operation, the limiting conditions for operation (LCOs) and associated action statements of technical specifications typically require that the plant be shut down within the limits of allowed outage time (AOT). However, when a system needed to remove decay heat, such as the residual heat removal (RHR) system, is inoperable or degraded, shutting down the plant may not necessarily be preferable, from a risk perspective, to continuing power operation over a usual repair time, giving priority to the repairs. The risk impact of the basic operational alternatives, i.e., continued operation or shutdown, was evaluated for failures in the RHR and standby service water (SSW) systems of a boiling-water reactor (BWR) nuclear power plant. A complete or partial failure of the SSW system fails or degrades not only the RHR system but other front-line safety systems supported by the SSW system. This report presents the methodology to evaluate the risk impact of LCOs and associated AOT; the results of risk evaluation from its application to the RHR and SSW systems of a BWR; the findings from the risk-sensitivity analyses to identify alternative operational policies; and the major insights and recommendations to improve the technical specifications action statements.

Mankamo, T. [Avaplan Oy, Espoo (Finland); Kim, I.S.; Samanta, P.K. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

FROM: DATE: TO:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: DATE: TO: POLICY FLASH 2010-48 May 06,20 1 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition LetterIFinancial Assistance Letter (ALIFAL) 201 0-06, Acquiring Information Technology, Requirement to Comply With Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) SUMMARY: ALIFAL 201 0-06 provides notice that the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council are issuing a final rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to require that Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) compliant products be included in all new information technology (IT) acquisitions using Internet Protocol (IP). ALIFAL 2010-06, accordingly, updates the IPv6 guidance provided in AL-2006-04.

162

MEtlORANDUM DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

---B-B TYPE OF OPERATION we s- --- Research & Development E Facility Type 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilot Scale ti Bench Seal e Process 0 Theoretical...

163

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

requiring or involving responsibility for work or operations at DOENNSA sites or facilities that support or perform essential functionsactivities'that directly support...

164

Interim safety basis for fuel supply shutdown facility  

SciTech Connect

This ISB in conjunction with the new TSRs, will provide the required basis for interim operation or restrictions on interim operations and administrative controls for the Facility until a SAR is prepared in accordance with the new requirements. It is concluded that the risk associated with the current operational mode of the Facility, uranium closure, clean up, and transition activities required for permanent closure, are within Risk Acceptance Guidelines. The Facility is classified as a Moderate Hazard Facility because of the potential for an unmitigated fire associated with the uranium storage buildings.

Brehm, J.R.; Deobald, T.L.; Benecke, M.W.; Remaize, J.A.

1995-05-23T23:59:59.000Z

165

One-of-a-Kind Facility Now in Safe Shutdown | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One-of-a-Kind Facility Now in Safe Shutdown One-of-a-Kind Facility Now in Safe Shutdown One-of-a-Kind Facility Now in Safe Shutdown January 1, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the team that helped safely close the Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator at Oak Ridge gather for a photo. The team is from URS|CH2M, Oak Ridge, the prime contractor for the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management. Members of the team that helped safely close the Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator at Oak Ridge gather for a photo. The team is from URS|CH2M, Oak Ridge, the prime contractor for the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management. OAK RIDGE, Tenn. - Oak Ridge's East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) is home to many unique facilities, each constructed for a specific purpose. Today, almost all of the facilities at the site are in the process of being

166

One-of-a-Kind Facility Now in Safe Shutdown | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

One-of-a-Kind Facility Now in Safe Shutdown One-of-a-Kind Facility Now in Safe Shutdown One-of-a-Kind Facility Now in Safe Shutdown January 1, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the team that helped safely close the Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator at Oak Ridge gather for a photo. The team is from URS|CH2M, Oak Ridge, the prime contractor for the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management. Members of the team that helped safely close the Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator at Oak Ridge gather for a photo. The team is from URS|CH2M, Oak Ridge, the prime contractor for the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management. OAK RIDGE, Tenn. - Oak Ridge's East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) is home to many unique facilities, each constructed for a specific purpose. Today, almost all of the facilities at the site are in the process of being

167

Intermediate leak protection/automatic shutdown for B and W helical coil steam generator  

SciTech Connect

The report summarizes a follow-on study to the multi-tiered Intermediate Leak/Automatic Shutdown System report. It makes the automatic shutdown system specific to the Babcock and Wilcox (B and W) helical coil steam generator and to the Large Development LMFBR Plant. Threshold leak criteria specific to this steam generator design are developed, and performance predictions are presented for a multi-tier intermediate leak, automatic shutdown system applied to this unit. Preliminary performance predictions for application to the helical coil steam generator were given in the referenced report; for the most part, these predictions have been confirmed. The importance of including a cover gas hydrogen meter in this unit is demonstrated by calculation of a response time one-fifth that of an in-sodium meter at hot standby and refueling conditions.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

DATE: February 7, 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: July 8, 2011 Report Number: INS-L-11-02 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-40 (S10IS001) SUBJECT: Letter Report on "Implementation of Nuclear Weapons Quality Assurance Requirements at Los Alamos National Laboratory" TO: Manager, Los Alamos Site Office INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Los Alamos National Laboratory (Los Alamos) is a multidisciplinary research and production institution responsible for the design and production of nuclear weapons components. In its effort to attain the highest quality in weapons engineering design and manufacturing, the Department of Energy

169

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

> POLICY FLASH 2010-25 DATE: TO: FROM: February 22,201 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 1.4 Establishing the Position of Source Evaluation Board (SEB) Secretariat and Knowledge Manager SUMMARY: As discussed at the December 2009 Procurement Directors' Meeting, a position titled "Source Evaluation Board (SEB) Secretariat and Knowledge Manager" has been established in the Acquisition Planning and Liaison Division, MA-621 Attached is the subject new DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 1.4 which provides guidance on the establishment of the aforementioned position and the duties and responsibilities of the position.

170

Brawley 10MW Geothermal Plant Plant Manual for Southern California Edison Company and Union Oil Company of California: Systems Start-up and Operations, Volume II  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Each system within the facility is considered from an operation viewpoint. There are five subsegments within this operation's viewpoint. Prerequisite conditions, start-up, normal operating, emergency and shutdown.

None

1980-11-28T23:59:59.000Z

171

MEMORANDUM TO: FILE DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TYPE OF OPERATION ------ Research & Development .m vale Qppl p 4' q Facility Type 0 Hlemll stii es 0 Production eta e testing L-h Ico*vl 0 Pilot Scale' q...

172

Cooling/heating augmentation during turbine startup/shutdown using a seal positioned by thermal response of turbine parts and consequent relative movement thereof  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

In a turbine rotor, a thermal mismatch between various component parts of the rotor occurs particularly during transient operations such as shutdown and startup. A thermal medium flows past and heats or cools one part of the turbine which may have a deleterious thermal mismatch with another part. By passively controlling the flow of cooling medium past the one part in response to relative movement of thermally responsive parts of the turbine, the flow of thermal medium along the flow path can be regulated to increase or reduce the flow, thereby to regulate the temperature of the one part to maintain the thermal mismatch within predetermined limits.

Schmidt, Mark Christopher (Niskayuna, NY)

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DURING DECOMMISSIONING AND PERMANENT SHUTDOWN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This guide has been developed to describe methods acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the NRC’s regulations regarding fire protection programs for licensees who have certified that their plants have permanently ceased operations and that the fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessels.

A. Introduction

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 < 1 < DATE: TO: FROM: July 1,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Revised DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 71.1 Headquarters Business Clearance Process SUMMARY: There was mention in the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) report titled "Managing at the Speed of Light - Improving Mission Support Performance" that Departmental procurement personnel don't understand the Business Clearance (BC) process. In an effort to address this issue, each Procurement Director (PD) and Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) was ask to review Acquisition Guide Chapter 7 1.1 Headquarters Business Clearance Process and identify anything that was unclear, as well as recommend changes or ideas which

175

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 DATE: TO: FROM: March 25,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Rescind Policy Flashes 201 0-04 "Cease All Funding of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)" and 201 0-06 "Additional Documentation Regarding Policy Flash Number 201 0-04" SUMMARY: The purpose of this flash to inform you that on March 10,201 0, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued an opinion regarding ACORN. In its opinion, the District Court concluded that the funding prohibitions regarding ACORN and related entities in FY 201 0 Continuing Resolution and in several of FY 201 0 appropriations acts

176

Date: Re: Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

~ ~ ~~ Date: Re: Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 5, 2007 TRADEMARK l APPLICATION AND LICENSING PROCEDURES, IPI Trademarks may be used by DOE or its contractors for identification of goods and services and serve as an intellectual property tool to enhance technology transfer. Registration in the PTO also helps to ensure that marks closely associated with DOE are not debased or devalued, and also helps to protect the public from those who may use marks closely associated with DOE to suggest "goods or services" are authorized by DOE. This IPI contains guidance on trademarks once the decision has been made to use a particular mark in commerce and obtain protection therefor. This IPI does not contain guidance as to when, in the first instance, a mark should be coined for association with a particular good/service, except at B.4 with respect to use of DOE as part of a mark.

177

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

65 65 ' July 7,20 1 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act SUMMARY: This Flash forwards a draft Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause, 52.222- 40, Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act. Executive Order (EO) 13496, Notification of Employee Rights under Federal Labor Laws, dated January 30,2009, requires contractors and subcontractors to post a notice that informs employees of their rights under Federal labor laws, including the National Labor Relations Act. This Act encourages collective bargaining and protects the exercise by workers of their freedom

178

Issuance Date:: February  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Issuance Issuance Date:: February 11, 1966 POST-SHOT HYDROLOGI C SAFETY 68296 VUF-1014 FINAL REPORT FALLON, NEVADA OCTOBER 26, 1963 Hazleton-Nuclear Science Corporation October 30, 1965 SPONSORED BY THE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND THE U. S.ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION VELA UNIFORM PROJECT LEG A L NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored work. Neither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission: A. Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accu- racy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information. apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the

179

United States Government DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

5oE(E;,8 ' 0 H .2+ L-1 5oE(E;,8 ' 0 H .2+ L-1 United States Government DATE: MAR 0 8 1994 REPLY TO AlTN OF: EM-421 (W. A. Williams, 903-8149) SUBJECT: Authority Determination -- Former Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., Hamilton, Ohio TO: The File The attached review documents the basis for determining whether the Department of Energy (DOE) has authority for taking remedial action at the former Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. facility in Hamilton, Ohio, under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The facility was used for the shaping and machining of uranium metal by the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) during the Second World War. The following factors are significant in reaching a decision and are discussed in more detail in the attached authority review:

180

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-7' -7' August 20,2010 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Class Deviation by General Services Administration (GSA) to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 51.1, Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources, for Time and Material or Labor Hour Procurements SUMMARY: The attached GSA class deviation to FAR Part 51, Contractor Use of Government Supply Sources, dated October 8,2009, permits contracting officers to authorize all GSA contractors, who are performing an order on a time and material (T&M) or labor-hour (LH) basis, to purchase supplies and service from other schedule contractors or process requisitions through the GSA Supply Program. This deviation is effective for five years to October 7,2014,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1,2008 1 1,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBTECT: Past Performance Data SIJMMARY: Beginning October 01,2008, all contractor past performance data shall be submitted through the Department of Defense (DoD) Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) at htt~://www.c~ars.csd.disa.mil/cr>arsmain.htm. Thus, the Department will no longer use the National Institute of Health (NIH) Contractor Performance System (CPS). To ensure all Contracting Officers understand how to use this new system, Web Cast Training has been scheduled for the following dates and times: October 8- 1:30-430 including construction and A/E training during the last hour November 6- 1:30-4:30 including construction and A/E training during the last hour

182

DATE: REPLY TO  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

DOE F 1325.8 DOE F 1325.8 (NW ed States Governhent ilmemorandum DATE: REPLY TO ' bPfl29 1993 Al-fN OF: EM-421 (W. W illiams, 903-8149) SUBJECT: Authorization for Remedial Action at the Former Associate Aircraft Site, Fairfield, Ohio TO: Manager, DOE Oak Ridge Field Office This is to notify you that the Former Associated Aircraft Site in Fairfield, Ohio, is designated,for remedial action under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). This notification does not constitute a FUSRAP baseline change control approval. Approval of the baseline change will be accomplished through the normal change control procedures. The site was used by the former Atomic Energy Commission for the machining and shaping of uranium metal during the 1950s. A radiological survey

183

DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: - - -- . POLICY FLASH 2005-18 February 14, 2005 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, ME-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Small Business Contracting Policy Update SUMMARY: This Policy Flash forwards (1) information on locating Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSBs) and (2) a solicitation provision which provides guidance to prospective offerors on the impact of teaming arrangements on their small business status. 1 -- -- --------- 1. To locate SDVOSBs, you can go to the Department of Veteran Affairs' website for the Center for Veterans Enterprise site at http://www.vetbiz.gov/default2.htm. From that site you can link to the "Search for a Business" at http://vip.vetbiz.gov/search/default.asp to find SDVQSBs. 2. The following provision is recommended for solicitations

184

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 . 1 . January 20,20 1 0 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Commercial Items Test Program SUMMARY: Attached for your information is a copy of Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC) Letter 2009-04. It advises that the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 201 0, Section 8 16 authorizes extension of the Commercial Items Test Program from January 1,20 10 to January 1,20 12 and that an expedited FAR Case is being processed to insert the new date at FAR 13.500(d). Also attached is a class deviation authorizing the use of simplified acquisition procedures for commercial items up to $5.5 million [$I1 million for acquisitions of commercial items under FAR

185

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POLICY FLASH 2010-08 POLICY FLASH 2010-08 DATE: TO: FROM: October 28,2009 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Amendment to Extend the Partnership Agreement between the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Department of Energy (DOE) SUMMARY: The purpose of this flash is to advise you that an amendment was issued pursuant to Section VII of the Partnership Agreement (PA) between the SBA and the DOE. The amendment extends the current PA until November 30,2009. All other terms and conditions of the PA remain unchanged. This flash and its attachment will be available online at the following website: http://mana~ement.enerm.nov/policy nuidancelpolicy flashes.htm.

186

Release Date: April 2010  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

April 2010 DOE/EIA-0121 (2009/04Q) April 2010 DOE/EIA-0121 (2009/04Q) Next Release Date: June 2010 Quarterly Coal Report October - December 2009 April 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 _____________________________________________________________________________ This report is available on the Web at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/quarterly/qcr.pdf _____________________________________________ This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the independent statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this

187

Procurement Directors DATE: TO:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

18 18 1 POLICY FLASH 2008-1 8 January 29,2008 Procurement Directors DATE: TO: FROM: Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-6 1 Ofice of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Acquisition Circular 2008-18 SUMMARY: The General Services Administration has issued Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-23. This Circular can be found at page 732 14 of the December 26,2007 Federal Register. The Circular covers three subjects for which interim or final rules have been issued amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation. A description of each revision is contained in the attachment. None of these necessitates a revision of the DEAR. One of the revisions dealing with the Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) replaces

188

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 December 16,2009 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Ofice of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-38 SUMMARY: Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-3 8, which makes miscellaneous changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), was published in the December 10, 2009 issue of the Federal Register. A summary of the changes is attached. Due to the publication of two rules item I11 and item V, additional guidance is provided in this flash. Item I11 - Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) (FAR Case 2005-041) - The Acquisition Letter 2006-04, Acquiring Information Technology - Requirement to Comply with Internet Protocol Version 6, dated December 14,2005, is being reviewed to determine if

189

Fault-tree analysis for liquefied natural gas terminal emergency shutdown system  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Natural gas, one of the cleanest, most efficient and useful of all energy sources, is a vital component of the world's supply of energy. To make natural gas more convenient for storage and transportation, it is refined and condensed into a liquid called ... Keywords: Emergency shutdown system, Fault-tree analysis, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory, Liquefied natural gas, Probability

Shuen-Ren Cheng; Binshan Lin; Bi-Min Hsu; Ming-Hung Shu

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

190

Shutdown Hideout Return Chemistry at Browns Ferry-2 and Hatch-2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes and analyzes the results of augmented hideout return studies conducted at the Browns Ferry 2 and Hatch 2 boiling water reactors (BWRs) during shutdowns in the spring of 2003. The aim was to provide insights into differences in corrosion of similar fuel cladding materials at the two facilities.

2004-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

191

Trends vs. reactor size of passive reactivity shutdown and control performance  

SciTech Connect

The focus of the US advanced reactor program since the cancellation of CRBR has been on inherent safety and cost reduction. The notion is to so design the reactor that in the event of an off normal condition, it brings itself to a safe shutdown condition and removes decay heat by reliance on ''inherent processes'' i.e., without reliance on devices requiring switching and outside sources of power. Such a reactor design would offer the potential to eliminate costly ''Engineered Safety Features,'' to lower capital costs, and to assuage public unease concerning reactor safety. For LMR concepts, the goal of passive reactivity shutdown has been approached in the US by designing the reactors for favorable relationships among the power, power/flow, and inlet temperature coefficients of reactivity, for high internal conversion ratio (yielding small burnup control swing), and for a primary pump coastdown time appropriately matched to the delayed neutron hold back of power decay upon negative reactivity input. The use of sodium bonded metallic fuel pins has facilitated the achievement of the passive shutdown design goals as a consequence of their high thermal conductivity and high effective heavy metal density. Alternately, core designs based on derated oxide pins may be able to achieve the passive shutdown features at the cost of larger core volume and increased initial fissile inventory. 8 refs., 12 figs., 1 tab.

Wade, D.C.; Fujita, E.K.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

192

Chiller Shutdowns Caused by Sensitivity of Control Relays to Voltage Sags  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document presents the investigation performed by the EPRI Power Electronics Applications Center (PEAC) and Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO) of chiller shutdowns which coincided with momentary reduced voltage or voltage sags at the National Archives II, a U.S. government research and storage facility that houses many of our national treasures.

2003-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

193

Assessment of SO2 Emissions Control Achieved in Practice During Startup and Shutdown  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides a better understanding of the capability of modern flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems to comply with the typical emission limitations for sulfur dioxide (SO2). These SO2 limitations have been included in some recently issued permits for new electric utility pulverized coal (PC)-fired boilers to apply during periods of boiler startup and shutdown.

2009-03-17T23:59:59.000Z

194

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 28,2008 November 28,2008 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 13 Policy and Operating Procedures for Use of the GSA Smartpay2 Purchase Card SUMMARY: Attached for your information is a copy of DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 13 Policy and Operating Procedures for Use of the GSA Smartpay2 Purchase Card. It has been revised to reflect our new contract with the JPMorgan Chase Bank. This Flash and its attachment will be posted online, at the following website: http://www.mana~ement.energy.~~~/u~li~~ ~uidance/~olicy flashes.htm. Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Denise Clark at (202) 287-1748 or DeniseT.Clarke@hq.doe.nov .

195

DATE: TO: FROM:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

75 75 p l September 29,2009 Procurement Directors Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61 Office of Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Update to the DOE Implementation Guide for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 SUMMARY: As previously stated, the subject Guide is intended to be a "living document" that will be periodically updated, as necessary. This current update to Version 2.1 is being released as Version 2.1 a. There are two updates to Version 2.1. They are to delete the requirement for management and operating contracts to report by ARRA project code and revise the information in subchapter 4.9 on the reporting of executive compensation. Sections that are amended by Version 2.1 and 2. l

196

MEMORANDUM TO: FILE, OH. 0 DATE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

FILE, OH. 0 DATE FILE, OH. 0 DATE d4, ------------------- FROM: b. x&,.& ---------S-----W SUBJECT: 1-3/;4*~ i&-h /LCL)&l&OAiOH h fi Q-cc& )2~see~ SITE NAME: ----fl eAd4 RQJ-cL ALTERNATE __-_-_---------------------------- NAME: ---------------------- CITY: -------------------------- STATE: B---m- OWNER(S) -------- Past: JAwd* ------------------------ Current: _------------------------- Owwr contacted 0 yes rno; if yes, date contacted B-m -----w-v TYPE OF OPERATION ----------------- pg Research t Development cl Facility Type 0 Production scale testing 0 Pilot Scale 0 Bench Scale Process 0 Theoretical Studies 0 Sample SC Analysie 0 Manufacturing 0 University 0 Research Organization 0 Government Sponsored Facility U Other ---------------------

197

Start-Up of Air Conditioning Systems After Periods of Shutdown (Humidity Considerations)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In many cases the single most important energy conservation measure that can be taken is to turn equipment off when it is not needed. In the case of air conditioning, this generally means turning it off when occupants leave and turning it back on in time to have the space comfortable when they return. In humid climates special problems are often encountered when a system is restarted after a period of shutdown. The temperature and humidity in the space rises during the period of shutdown. Unfortunately the latent load required to bring the space back to comfort conditions is usually much higher than the sensible load. Most methods of control are ill suited for this duty. This paper examines the response of various types of air conditioning systems during this recovery period and makes recommendations for system designers.

Todd, T. R.

1986-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

BWRVIP-176: BWR Vessel and Internals Project, BWR Shutdown Chemistry Experience Report and Application Guidelines  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

All BWRs in the US apply Hydrogen Water Chemistry (HWC), and the majority implement Noble Metal Chemical Application (NMCA) to provide protection against intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC). This report, prepared by an industry focus group, summarizes recent plant experience in shutdown chemistry prior to refueling outages, and provides guidance on good practices and situations to avoid. The goals are to minimize the adverse effects of activity release, mitigate intergranular stress corrosion...

2007-10-30T23:59:59.000Z

199

Design criteria for a self-actuated shutdown system to ensure limitation of core damage. [LMFBR  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Safety-based functional requirements and design criteria for a self-actuated shutdown system (SASS) are derived in accordance with LOA-2 success criteria and reliability goals. The design basis transients have been defined and evaluated for the CDS Phase II design, which is a 2550 MWt mixed oxide heterogeneous core reactor. A partial set of reactor responses for selected transients is provided as a function of SASS characteristics such as reactivity worth, trip points, and insertion times.

Deane, N.A.; Atcheson, D.B.

1981-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Oxidation and Reduction of Copper in Steam Generator Deposits: Under Shutdown, Layup, and Startup Conditions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This project was initiated to address recent experience suggesting that the oxidation of secondary-side tube scale during shutdown, layup, and startup (SLS) is a major factor in the corrosion degradation of pressurized water reactor (PWR) steam generators (SGs). The objective of this project was to evaluate the potential for oxidation and reduction of SG deposits under prototypical SLS conditions. Steam generator deposits contain a variety of compounds or metals that could potentially be oxidized or redu...

2001-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

AUTHORS DATE PP  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The aerospace industry is showing a growing interest to apply acoustic treatment in the exhaust ducts of turbofan engines to attenuate combustion and turbine noise. The design, optimisation and testing of hot stream liners require improved theoretical models and facilities to validate and evaluate the acoustic performances of these liners under realistic engine operating conditions. To extend the capabilities for liner testing, NLR has modified an existing burner rig. The main objective was to build a facility for hot stream liner testing up to a flow Mach number of 0.4 and a maximum temperature of 500 ºC, which has been met. Both insertion loss and in-situ acoustic impedance measurements can be performed at maximum sound pressure levels of about 145 dB. An overview is given of the design and commissioning of the new facility, the instrumentation and the measurement techniques. Furthermore a selection of results are presented on measured insertion losses and acoustic impedances. Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR NLR-TP-2003-202

R. J. Nijboer; S. L. Sarin

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

202

www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk Predicting the Contractual Cost of Unplanned Shutdowns of Power  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Keywords The growing penetration of intermittent power generation technologies is increasing the importance of efficient electricity balancing mechanisms. This paper presents a model for analysing the financial cost to an electricity supplier when a power generator unexpectedly instananeously shuts down, in the context of the UK National Grid. The simulation probabilistically selects historical market data and includes analysis on the impact on the system buy price of historical unplanned generator shutdowns. A case study is presented for one revolutionary nuclear power station design concept, the Accelerator-Driven Subcritical Reactor (ADSR). The reliability of ADSRs is a key issue facing their future development. The model is used to identify when the economic cost of improving reliability exceeds the cost of unplanned shutdowns. The results are presented in a form that allows the reader to scale the cost of accelerator system failures for any capacity factor and coefficient of reliability, for a range of discount rates and electricity prices. unplanned shutdown, cost, intermittent, accelerator-driven subcritical reactor Contact

Power Stations; An Accelerator-driven Subcritical; Steven J Steer; William J Nuttall; Geoffrey T Parks; Leonardo Vn Gonçalves; Steven J Steer; William J Nuttall; Geoffrey T Parks; Leonardo V N Gonçalves

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Radiocarbon dating, memories, and hopes  

SciTech Connect

The history of radiocarbon dating from 1939 to the present is reviewed. The basic principles of radiocarbon dating are that cosmic rays make living things radioactive with {sup 14}C to a certain level fixed by the environment and that at death the intake of food stops so no replenishment of the {sup 14}C steadily lost by the immutable decay occurs. Therefore measurement of the degree of decay gives the time lapse since death, i.e., the radiocarbon age. The equipment developed and experiments performed to measure the specific activity of specimens to be dated are described. The results obtained by world-wide experimenters are discussed. These showed that on simultaneity radiocarbon dating is apparently reliable but that absolute dates may be incorrect by as much as 600 to 700 y. The value of radiocarbon dating to archaeologists, geologists, climatologists, and historians is stressed. (LCL)

Libby, W.F.

1972-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

NEUTRONIC REACTOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A method is given for operating a nuclear reactor having a negative coefficient of reactivity to compensate for the change in reactor reactivity due to the burn-up of the xenon peak following start-up of the reactor. When it is desired to start up the reactor within less than 72 hours after shutdown, the temperature of the reactor is lowered prior to start-up, and then gradually raised after start-up.

West, J.M.; Weills, J.T.

1960-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

205

Dates Fact Sheet.cdr  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

crossing. This enhances an asset owner's situational awareness capability beyond simple event detection and log management. The DATES monitoring platform uses multiple algorithms...

206

Next Release Date: September 2012  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

October 2010 DOEEIA-0121 (201002Q) Next Release Date: September 2012 Revised: July 2012 Quarterly Coal Report April - June 2010 October 2010 U.S. Energy Information...

207

The procedure execution manager and its application to Advanced Photon Source operation  

SciTech Connect

The Procedure Execution Manager (PEM) combines a complete scripting environment for coding accelerator operation procedures with a manager application for executing and monitoring the procedures. PEM is based on Tcl/Tk, a supporting widget library, and the dp-tcl extension for distributed processing. The scripting environment provides support for distributed, parallel execution of procedures along with join and abort operations. Nesting of procedures is supported, permitting the same code to run as a top-level procedure under operator control or as a subroutine under control of another procedure. The manager application allows an operator to execute one or more procedures in automatic, semi-automatic, or manual modes. It also provides a standard way for operators to interact with procedures. A number of successful applications of PEM to accelerator operations have been made to date. These include start-up, shutdown, and other control of the positron accumulator ring (PAR), low-energy transport (LET) lines, and the booster rf systems. The PAR/LET procedures make nested use of PEM`s ability to run parallel procedures. There are also a number of procedures to guide and assist tune-up operations, to make accelerator physics measurements, and to diagnose equipment. Because of the success of the existing procedures, expanded use of PEM is planned.

Borland, M. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Advanced Photon Source

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

DIII-D Studies of Massive Gas Injection Fast Shutdowns for Disruption Mitigation  

SciTech Connect

Injection of massive quantities of gas is a promising technique for fast shutdown of ITER for the purpose of avoiding divertor and first wall damage from disruptions. Previous experiments using massive gas injection (MGI) to terminate discharges in the DIII-D tokamak have demonstrated rapid shutdown with reduced wall heating and halo currents (relative to natural disruptions) and with very small runaway electron (RE) generation [1]. Figure 1 shows time traces which give an overview of shutdown time scales. Typically, of order 5 x 10{sup 22} Ar neutrals are fired over a pulse of 25 ms duration into stationary (non-disrupting) discharges. The observed results are consistent with the following scenario: within several ms of the jet trigger, sufficient Ar neutrals are delivered to the plasma to cause the edge temperature to collapse, initiating the inward propagation of a cold front. The exit flow of the jet [Fig. 1(a)] has a {approx} 9 ms rise time; so the quantity of neutrals which initiates the edge collapse is small (<10{sup 20}). When the cold front reaches q {approx} 2 surface, global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modes are destabilized [2], mixing hot core plasma with edge impurities. Here, q is the safety factor. Most (>90%) of the plasma thermal energy is lost via impurity radiation during this thermal quench (TQ) phase. Conducted heat loads to the wall are low because of the cold edge temperature. After the TQ, the plasma is very cold (of order several eV), so conducted wall (halo) currents are low, even if the current channel contacts the wall. The plasma current profile broadens and begins decaying resistively. The decaying current generates a toroidal electric field which can accelerate REs; however, RE beam formation appears to be limited in MGI shutdowns. Presently, it is thought that the conducted heat flux and halo current mitigation qualities of the MGI shutdown technique will scale well to a reactor-sized tokamak. However, because of the larger RE gain from avalanching and the presence of a RE seed population due to Compton-scattered fast electrons, it is possible that a RE beam can be formed well into the CQ, after the flux surfaces initially destroyed by the TQ MHD have had time to heal. Crucial MGI issues to be studied in present devices are therefore the formation, amplification, and transport of RE and the transport of impurities into the core plasma (important because the presence of impurities can, via collisional drag, help suppress RE amplification). In the study of impurity transport, both neutral delivery (directly driven into the core by the jet pressure) and ion delivery (mixed into the core by MHD) are of interest, as both contribute to RE drag.

Hollmann, E; Jernigan, T; Antar, G; Bakhtiari, M; Boedo, J; Combs, S; Evans, T; Gray, D; Groth, M; Huymphreys, D; Lasnier, C; Moyer, R; Parks, P; Rudakov, D; Strait, E; Wesley, J; West, W; Whyte, D; Yu, J

2006-06-19T23:59:59.000Z

209

DIII-D Studies of Massive Gas Injection Fast Shutdowns for Disruption Mitigation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Injection of massive quantities of gas is a promising technique for fast shutdown of ITER for the purpose of avoiding divertor and first wall damage from disruptions. Previous experiments using massive gas injection (MGI) to terminate discharges in the DIII-D tokamak have demonstrated rapid shutdown with reduced wall heating and halo currents (relative to natural disruptions) and with very small runaway electron (RE) generation [1]. Figure 1 shows time traces which give an overview of shutdown time scales. Typically, of order 5 x 10{sup 22} Ar neutrals are fired over a pulse of 25 ms duration into stationary (non-disrupting) discharges. The observed results are consistent with the following scenario: within several ms of the jet trigger, sufficient Ar neutrals are delivered to the plasma to cause the edge temperature to collapse, initiating the inward propagation of a cold front. The exit flow of the jet [Fig. 1(a)] has a {approx} 9 ms rise time; so the quantity of neutrals which initiates the edge collapse is small (90%) of the plasma thermal energy is lost via impurity radiation during this thermal quench (TQ) phase. Conducted heat loads to the wall are low because of the cold edge temperature. After the TQ, the plasma is very cold (of order several eV), so conducted wall (halo) currents are low, even if the current channel contacts the wall. The plasma current profile broadens and begins decaying resistively. The decaying current generates a toroidal electric field which can accelerate REs; however, RE beam formation appears to be limited in MGI shutdowns. Presently, it is thought that the conducted heat flux and halo current mitigation qualities of the MGI shutdown technique will scale well to a reactor-sized tokamak. However, because of the larger RE gain from avalanching and the presence of a RE seed population due to Compton-scattered fast electrons, it is possible that a RE beam can be formed well into the CQ, after the flux surfaces initially destroyed by the TQ MHD have had time to heal. Crucial MGI issues to be studied in present devices are therefore the formation, amplification, and transport of RE and the transport of impurities into the core plasma (important because the presence of impurities can, via collisional drag, help suppress RE amplification). In the study of impurity transport, both neutral delivery (directly driven into the core by the jet pressure) and ion delivery (mixed into the core by MHD) are of interest, as both contribute to RE drag.

Hollmann, E; Jernigan, T; Antar, G; Bakhtiari, M; Boedo, J; Combs, S; Evans, T; Gray, D; Groth, M; Huymphreys, D; Lasnier, C; Moyer, R; Parks, P; Rudakov, D; Strait, E; Wesley, J; West, W; Whyte, D; Yu, J

2006-06-19T23:59:59.000Z

210

BWRVIP-225, Revision 1: BWR Vessel and Internals Project: BWR Shutdown and Startup Chemistry Experience and Application Sourcebook  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

All boiling water reactors (BWRs) in the US apply Hydrogen Water Chemistry (HWC), and the majority implement noble metals addition in the form of On-line NobleChemTM (OLNC) to protect against intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC). This report, prepared by an industry focus group, summarizes recent plant experience in shutdown and startup chemistry control. The overall goals are to minimize activity transport during shutdown evolutions, avoid increasing outage duration, and to ...

2013-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

211

Property:Achievement Date | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Date Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Achievement Date Property Type String Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleProperty:AchievementDate&oldid...

212

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-653 HVAC Modifications SECTION B. Project Description: The proposed project plans to replace the existing blowers, swamp coolers and electric heaters in the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Test Reactor Area-653 (TRA-653) office area with three roof mounted heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and install six roof mounted HVAC units at the TRA-653 machine shop area. These modifications are needed to enhance workplace habitability, maintain a more consistent building environment, and achieve a more energy efficient system. The TRA- 653 machine shop currently uses portable swamp coolers to cool their shop. TRA-653 is eligible for the National Historic Register, however, the activity as described is exempt from cultural resource review (INL Cultural Resource Management Plan;

213

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

42 42 SECTION A. Project Title: Innovative Manufacturing Process for Improving the Erosion/Corrosion Resistance of Power Plant Components via Powder Metallurgy & Hot Isostatic Processing Methods - Electric Power Research Institute SECTION B. Project Description The objective of this project is to conduct the necessary design, processing, manufacturing, and validation studies to assess powder metallurgy/hot isostatic processing (PM/HIP) as a method to produce very large near-net shaped (NNS) components with erosion/corrosion resistant surfaces for use in nuclear and electrical power generation equipment. * Project tasks include the following: * Modeling of NNS Component Alloy & Mold/Can design * Test coupon development, demonstration, and screening for surface applications

214

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 SECTION A. Project Title: Test Reactor Cask Implementation. SECTION B. Project Description: This proposed action is a process and facility modification. Background / Purpose & Need The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) uses the Naval Reactors (NR) Casks to transport test trains between the Naval Reactors Facility (NRF) Expended Core Facility and the ATR. The Naval Reactor (NR) Casks, however, are approaching the end of their design life. In 1997, Bettis initiated a contract for construction of the NR Cask replacement, the Test Reactor Cask (TRC). The TRC is a revised and updated design of the NR cask and will be more robust structurally and provide more shielding than the current NR Casks. Construction of two TRCs is nearly finished and the INL must now modify the ATR facility and update ATR safety

215

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Replace 200,000 Gallon Water Storage Tank at MFC SECTION B. Project Description: The project is to replace the current 200,000 gallon potable water tank at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) with a new 300,000 gallon water tank. The existing tank and foundation will be removed and the waste materials managed and disposed under the direction of Waste Generator Services (WGS). The installation area for the new tank will be excavated and the new tank put in place. The new tank will be connected to the existing water system and will be coated on both exterior and interior surfaces to prevent corrosion. All valves and lines will be closed off to the construction area until the new tank is in place and the valves reconnected.

216

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-008 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-008 SECTION A. Project Title: Maintenance and Modification of Well TRA-08 SECTION B. Project Description: TRA-08, a groundwater monitoring well located approximately 1.5 miles south of the ATR Complex was drilled and constructed in 1990. The well is currently used as a groundwater monitoring compliance point for the ATR Complex Cold Waste Pond Industrial Wastewater Reuse Permit (IWRP). It is also used for CERCLA groundwater monitoring by CWI. Over the life of the well, corrosion of the carbon steel casing has resulted in an accumulation of rust flakes in the bottom of the well thus adversely affecting the efficiency of the well. In addition, the water level in the well has dropped from a depth of approximately 477 ft below ground surface at

217

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-ICP-12-005 SECTION A. Project Title: INTEC - U-233 Waste Stream Disposition SECTION B. Project Description The proposed action will transfer 171 drums of U-233 waste from the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) to INTEC for verification, treatment, and repackaging for final disposition at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The U233 drums are a portion of waste historically managed as transuranic as part of the 1995 Idaho Settlement Agreement.The waste management actions will be performed in CPP-659 or the Radioactive Mixed Waste Staging Facility (CPP-1617). The bulk of the U-233 waste is from the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory and consists of U-233/Th-232 contaminated materials (minor amounts of enriched, depleted and natural powders) generated in the 1970's during development of a

218

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

covers competitions. Word versions of the four templates will be available in the STRIPES Library. This Flash and its attachments will be available online within a day, at the...

219

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

will be e-mailed directly to the Procurement Directors and made available in the STRIPES Library. This Flash and its attachments will be available online within a day, at the...

220

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

version of the fourteen aforementioned RFP Section L and M templates are available in STRIPES as part of the series of DOE-L-1024 or DOE-M-1005 clauses. This Flash will be...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

version of the three aforementioned RFP Section H and L templates are available in STRIPES. This Flash will be available online within a day, at the following website: http:...

222

Dates:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the determinants of fire behavior though studying inputs (weather, slope, fuels, and fuel moisture); learn how to interpret fire behavior outputs; documentation processes; &...

223

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12 Request for Pre-Applications 12 Request for Pre-Applications Workscope Descriptions FY 2012 Request for Pre-Applications PROGRAM SUPPORTING: FUEL CYCLE R&D SEPARATIONS AND WASTE FORMS (F E DE R A L POC - J I M B R E SE E & T E C H NI C A L POC - T E R R Y T ODD) Separations and Waste Forms (FC-1) - The separations and waste forms campaign develops the next generation of fuel cycle and waste management technologies that enable a sustainable fuel cycle, with minimal processing, waste generation, and potential for material diversion. Today's technology challenges include the economical recovery of transuranic elements for recycle/transmutation; and minimizing waste generation (including both high level and low level waste). Priority research efforts revolve around achieving near-zero radioactive off-gas emissions; developing a simplified, single-step

224

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 SECTION A. Project Title: INL - Off-Road ATV Use In Support of Engineering Surveys SECTION B. Project Description The proposed action will allow for off-road ATV use near T-24 and T-25 at the Idaho National Laboratory Site. The ATV(s) will be used to survey in support of engineering design for a proposed upgraded haul road within the INL Site. Currently, an Environmental Assessment is being prepared to address upgrading either T-24 or T-25 to establish a site transportation route for the out-of-commerce shipment of materials and wastes from MFC to other site areas to reduce U.S. Highway 20 road closures, improve safety, and reduce cost. Since off-road use of motorized vehicles is prohibited unless approval is obtained, this Environmental Checklist will document that

225

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE G 440.2B-1A 9-19-05 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE AVIATION PROGRAM PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (METRICS) for use with DOE O 440.2B, Aviation Management and Safety [This Guide describes suggested nonmandatory approaches for meeting requirements. Guides are not requirements documents and may not be construed as requirements in any audit or appraisal for compliance with the parent Policy, Order, Notice, or Manual.] U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: www.directives.doe.gov Office of Aviation Management/OMBE/CFO DOE G 440.2B-1A i (and ii) 9-19-05 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Aviation Program performance indicators interim guide is approved by the Office of Aviation Management (OAM) and is available for use by all DOE and

226

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09-003 09-003 SECTION A. Project Title: Removal of Central Facilities Area (CFA)-661 Interior Walls and Mezzanine. SECTION B. Project Description The initial action to be covered under this Environmental Checklist will be removal of the mezzanines from CFA-661 to provide for material storage and work space for the National and Homeland Security (N&HS) Wireless Test Bed project. More specifically, this involves storage of electronic equipment, antennas and antenna masts, personnel supplies, and a variety of spare parts to support the project. In addition to storage, plans include a staging and lay down area where partial assembly of project equipment can be performed. Following completion of N&HS work within CFA-661, Facilities and Site Services will then remove the interior walls.

227

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 SECTION A. Project Title: Relocation of National and Homeland Security New Generation Wireless Test Bed Equipment and Personnel SECTION B. Project Description: This activity is to relocate and consolidate Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA) National and Homeland Security (NHS) New Generation Wireless Test Bed (NGWTB) program personnel and equipment from Critical Infrastructure Test Range Complex (CITRC) to Central Facilitis Area (CFA). This activity also includes relocating the antenna field from vicinity Power Burst Facility (PBF)-641 to the vicinity of PBF-620 Cell Site 9 area. The Remote Testing Monitoring Facility will be relocated from the vicinity of Gate 3 to the Cell Site 9 area. The Cell Site 9 area near PBF-620 is previously disturbed soil and asphalt.

228

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 SECTION A. Project Title: INL - Site Wide Well Abandonment Activities SECTION B. Project Description The proposed action will abandon inactive wells and injection wells at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Site. Wells and injection wells will be abandoned as per MCP-1442, MCP-3480 and the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) requirements, as applicable. The wells to be abandoned are located both within the INL facility boundaries and outside of the INL facility boundaries. The proposed action will address all classes of wells including Class IV and V injection wells. The wells will be abandoned in accordance with instructions provided in this Environmental Checklist, MCP-3480 and Section 4.5 in MCP-1442, Well Drilling, Maintenance, Surveillance, and Abandonment Activities. The MCPs identify the process to be followed for

229

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 SECTION A. Project Title: CFA-696 Power and Plumbing Upgrades SECTION B. Project Description: There is insufficient electrical power in the East Bay and the West Bay of the Central Facility Area (CFA) Transportation Complex to allow the craftsmen to fully utilize the available floor space without the use of extension cords. Additionally, a new hydraulic hose clamper is to be installed in the Parts Room and it needs a dedicated 30A power supply. The craftsmen also need another wash sink in the East Bay. The current method of connecting to the internet using Local Area Network (LAN) cables is cumbersome and inefficient. There is not enough lighting in the north side of the southeast section of the East Bay. This project installs the necessary electrical service, additional plumbing, and wireless internet capability as itemized below:

230

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-008 CX Posting No.: DOE-ID-INL-10-008 SECTION A. Project Title: Maintenance and Modification of Well TRA-08 SECTION B. Project Description: TRA-08, a groundwater monitoring well located approximately 1.5 miles south of the ATR Complex was drilled and constructed in 1990. The well is currently used as a groundwater monitoring compliance point for the ATR Complex Cold Waste Pond Industrial Wastewater Reuse Permit (IWRP). It is also used for CERCLA groundwater monitoring by CWI. Over the life of the well, corrosion of the carbon steel casing has resulted in an accumulation of rust flakes in the bottom of the well thus adversely affecting the efficiency of the well. In addition, the water level in the well has dropped from a depth of approximately 477 ft below ground surface at

231

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-653 HVAC Modifications SECTION B. Project Description: The proposed project plans to replace the existing blowers, swamp coolers and electric heaters in the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Test Reactor Area-653 (TRA-653) office area with three roof mounted heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and install six roof mounted HVAC units at the TRA-653 machine shop area. These modifications are needed to enhance workplace habitability, maintain a more consistent building environment, and achieve a more energy efficient system. The TRA- 653 machine shop currently uses portable swamp coolers to cool their shop. TRA-653 is eligible for the National Historic Register, however, the activity as described is exempt from cultural resource review (INL Cultural Resource Management Plan;

232

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 7 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-609 Compressed Air System Drain Line Modification and Valve Replacement SECTION B. Project Description: Due to periods of insufficient water flow to the sewer ponds, the clay liners in the ponds can dry out and crack. This proposed action is to add an additional drain line, which will allow clean well water that has been used to cool compressors to then be drained into the sewer system ponds during low flow periods in order to maintain a higher, more consistent water level. There are no chemicals added to the water. This project will replace the 1.5" compressor oil cooling water solenoid valves with ball valves on M-6, M-7 and M-8; replace the 2" compressor oil and air cooling system flow control valves on M-6, M-8 and M-9; install a new check valve in the compressed air system auxiliary compressor line; install a drain line

233

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 SECTION A. Project Title: TRA-609 Compressed Air System Drain Line Modification and Valve Replacement SECTION B. Project Description: Due to periods of insufficient water flow to the sewer ponds, the clay liners in the ponds can dry out and crack. This proposed action is to add an additional drain line, which will allow clean well water that has been used to cool compressors to then be drained into the sewer system ponds during low flow periods in order to maintain a higher, more consistent water level. There are no chemicals added to the water. This project will replace the 1.5" compressor oil cooling water solenoid valves with ball valves on M-6, M-7 and M-8; replace the 2" compressor oil and air cooling system flow control valves on M-6, M-8 and M-9; install a new check valve in the compressed air system auxiliary compressor line; install a drain line

234

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 SECTION A. Project Title: Characterization of Fluidized Beds via Pressure Fluctuation Analysis SECTION B. Project Description: The purpose of this work is to conduct research using pressure as a measure of performance for fluidized beds (spouted, bubbling, or slugging) at the Center for Advanced Energy Studies (CAES). The approach to this research activity consists of two main tasks: 1. Sieving the bed media with a motorized sieve shaker - sintered aluminosilicate spheres (used in the petroleum industry as a proppant to hold fractures open when the rock formation has been hydro-fractured) and assorted seeds (mustard, canola, sorghum, etc.). The aluminosilicate spheres have very little dust potential. Some of the aluminosilicates may have free silica

235

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

existing technologies to advance weld quality monitoring and closed loop feedback for welding systems and techniques typically used in the nuclear industry. 9. Stress Corrosion...

236

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

be performed without further CRM office involvement. Generating and Managing Waste - Industrial waste in the form of general construction debris such as waste concrete, scrap...

237

Date  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

owners rely on and hold contracts with Western for access to affordable and reliable bulk power supply from the Pick Sloan hydro electric system and transmission service from the...

238

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to give the facility the ability to perform tritium analysis. Additionally, under NRC License R-83, Texas A&M will up rate the reactor power from 1MW to 1.5 MW and purchase...

239

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ICP-12-003 SECTION A. Project Title: CPP-684 - Remote Analytical Laboratory Facility Modifications SECTION B. Project Description The proposed activities are intended to render...

240

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Managing Waste: Wooden material wastes would be generated from dimension lumber, plywood and particle board. No regulated wastes (e.g. chemicals, asbestos) are anticipated to...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

0 SECTION A. Project Title: Test Reactor Cask Implementation. SECTION B. Project Description: This proposed action is a process and facility modification. Background Purpose &...

242

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

CERCLA Disposal Facility or at an approved off-Site facility through Waste Generator Services. 19. Work within areas Subject to Flooding - Since the well abandonment work is...

243

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HEPA filters. These materials will be packaged and disposed of through Waste Generation Services. 19. Work in Areas Subject to Flooding - The activities discussed are planned to...

244

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for Improving the ErosionCorrosion Resistance of Power Plant Components via Powder Metallurgy & Hot Isostatic Processing Methods - Electric Power Research Institute SECTION B....

245

DATE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6 SUMMARY: Acquisition Letter (AL) 2013-06 and Financial...

246

Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This Design Manual Chapter 1620 Supplement is to revise WSDOT policy relating to the selection of impact attenuator systems. If you maintain a printed manual, please remove the current Chapter 1620 and replace it with the August 2011 Supplement. To get the latest information on WSDOT administrative and engineering manuals, sign up for

unknown authors

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Satellite Accumulation Areas (SAAs) or a <90-day storage areas before shipping to a treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF). DOE-ID NEPA CX DETERMINATION IDAHO NATIONAL...

248

DATE  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

will pack, move, setup, and test the NGWTB electronic equipment. In addition, the propane tank located at CFA-666 will be relocated to CFA-661. Three propane heaters and...

249

Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This thesis has been reviewed by the research advisor, research coordinator, and department chair and has been found to be satisfactory.

Clark David; Wilson Blockburger

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

01 01 SECTION A. Project Title: Nuclear Fabrication Consortium SECTION B. Project Description The mission of the NFC will be accomplished through both public and private funding. The list below outlines the programs that have identified for initiation under the initial DOE funding. Additional programs are envisioned and will be proposed, subject to any applicable budget constraints, to DOE-NE as they become known to EWI, the NFC, and DOE. 1. Automation of Advanced Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) Technologies The objective of the first phase of this project is to improve the reliability of NDE methods by increasing the automation content. 2. Advanced Laser Technology The objective is to identify laser applications that offer significant productivity gains over the current processes being used, and

251

DATE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 SECTION A. Project Title: Replace 200,000 Gallon Water Storage Tank at MFC SECTION B. Project Description: The project is to replace the current 200,000 gallon potable water tank at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) with a new 300,000 gallon water tank. The existing tank and foundation will be removed and the waste materials managed and disposed under the direction of Waste Generator Services (WGS). The installation area for the new tank will be excavated and the new tank put in place. The new tank will be connected to the existing water system and will be coated on both exterior and interior surfaces to prevent corrosion. All valves and lines will be closed off to the construction area until the new tank is in place and the valves reconnected.

252

104th Dates to Remember  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Questions? Contact Connie Hilson, AOCS Exhibits Specialist, by email: connieh@aocs.org or by phone: +1 217-639-4831. Dates to Remember * January 7, 201/span>3 Online registration opens January 15, 201/span>3 Exhibitor presentations: Deadl

253

Estimated Cost Description Determination Date:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and posted 2/10/2011 and posted 2/10/2011 *Title, Location Estimated Cost Description Determination Date: uncertain Transmittal to State: uncertain EA Approval: uncertain $50,000 FONSI: uncertain Determination Date: uncertain Transmittal to State: uncertain EA Approval: uncertain FONSI: uncertain Total Estimated Cost $70,000 Attachment: Memo, Moody to Marcinowski, III, SUBJECT: NEPA 2011 APS for DOE-SRS, Dated: Annual NEPA Planning Summary Environmental Assessments (EAs) Expected to be Initiated in the Next 12 Months Department of Energy (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) Jan-11 Estimated Schedule (**NEPA Milestones) South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Industrial Stormwater General Permit (IGP) # SCR000000 November 12, with an effective date of January

254

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2012 8, 2012 CX-009047: Categorical Exclusion Determination New Drainage Near E-004 Basin CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 8, 2012 CX-009046: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pad 16 Perimeter Paving CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 8, 2012 CX-009007: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northeast Provider of Solar Photovoltaic Instructor Training CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.16 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Golden Field Office August 8, 2012 CX-009045: Categorical Exclusion Determination Machining and Fabrication in 723-A CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

255

DIII-D Studies of Massive Gas Injection Fast Shutdowns for Disruption Mitigation  

SciTech Connect

Injection of massive quantities of gas is a promising technique for fast shutdown of ITER for the purpose of avoiding divertor and first wall damage from disruptions. Previous experiments using massive gas injection (MGI) to terminate discharges in the DIII-D tokamak have demonstrated rapid shutdown with reduced wall heating and halo currents (relative to natural disruptions) and with very small runaway electron (RE) generation [1]. Figure 1 shows time traces which give an overview of shutdown time scales. Typically, of order 5 x 10{sup 22} Ar neutrals are fired over a pulse of 25 ms duration into stationary (non-disrupting) discharges. The observed results are consistent with the following scenario: within several ms of the jet trigger, sufficient Ar neutrals are delivered to the plasma to cause the edge temperature to collapse, initiating the inward propagation of a cold front. The exit flow of the jet [Fig. 1(a)] has a {approx} 9 ms rise time; so the quantity of neutrals which initiates the edge collapse is small (<10{sup 20}). When the cold front reaches q {approx} 2 surface, global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modes are destabilized [2], mixing hot core plasma with edge impurities. Here, q is the safety factor. Most (>90%) of the plasma thermal energy is lost via impurity radiation during this thermal quench (TQ) phase. Conducted heat loads to the wall are low because of the cold edge temperature. After the TQ, the plasma is very cold (of order several eV), so conducted wall (halo) currents are low, even if the current channel contacts the wall. The plasma current profile broadens and begins decaying resistively. The decaying current generates a toroidal electric field which can accelerate REs; however, RE beam formation appears to be limited in MGI shutdowns. Presently, it is thought that the conducted heat flux and halo current mitigation qualities of the MGI shutdown technique will scale well to a reactor-sized tokamak. However, because of the larger RE gain from avalanching and the presence of a RE seed population due to Compton-scattered fast electrons, it is possible that a RE beam can be formed well into the CQ, after the flux surfaces initially destroyed by the TQ MHD have had time to heal. Crucial MGI issues to be studied in present devices are therefore the formation, amplification, and transport of RE and the transport of impurities into the core plasma (important because the presence of impurities can, via collisional drag, help suppress RE amplification). In the study of impurity transport, both neutral delivery (directly driven into the core by the jet pressure) and ion delivery (mixed into the core by MHD) are of interest, as both contribute to RE drag. Here, three new results relevant to RE suppression from MGI are presented: (1) evidence is presented that neutral jet propagation is stopped by toroidal magnetic field pressure, (2) MGI appears to cause the CQ to begin before sufficient impurities have been injected for complete collisional suppression of RE, and (3) flux surface destruction over the region q {le} 2 occurs during the TQ. The first result suggests that neutrals cannot be delivered to the core of large tokamak discharges by MGI, even during the CQ. The second result indicates that (at least for argon MGI in DIII-D), insufficient impurities (either neutral or ion) are delivered for collisional suppression of RE at the start of the CQ. The last result suggests that the destruction of good field lines resulting from MGI is quite extensive and should be sufficient to prevent RE formation, at least at the start of the CQ.

Hollmann, E; Jernigan, T; Antar, G; Bakhtiari, M; Boedo, J; Combs, S; Evans, T; Gray, D; Groth, M; Humphreys, D; Lasnier, C; Moyer, R; Parks, P; Rudakov, D; Strait, E; Wesley, J; West, W; Whyte, D; Yu, J

2006-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

256

DIII-D Studies of Massive Gas Injection Fast Shutdowns for Disruption Mitigation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Injection of massive quantities of gas is a promising technique for fast shutdown of ITER for the purpose of avoiding divertor and first wall damage from disruptions. Previous experiments using massive gas injection (MGI) to terminate discharges in the DIII-D tokamak have demonstrated rapid shutdown with reduced wall heating and halo currents (relative to natural disruptions) and with very small runaway electron (RE) generation [1]. Figure 1 shows time traces which give an overview of shutdown time scales. Typically, of order 5 x 10{sup 22} Ar neutrals are fired over a pulse of 25 ms duration into stationary (non-disrupting) discharges. The observed results are consistent with the following scenario: within several ms of the jet trigger, sufficient Ar neutrals are delivered to the plasma to cause the edge temperature to collapse, initiating the inward propagation of a cold front. The exit flow of the jet [Fig. 1(a)] has a {approx} 9 ms rise time; so the quantity of neutrals which initiates the edge collapse is small (90%) of the plasma thermal energy is lost via impurity radiation during this thermal quench (TQ) phase. Conducted heat loads to the wall are low because of the cold edge temperature. After the TQ, the plasma is very cold (of order several eV), so conducted wall (halo) currents are low, even if the current channel contacts the wall. The plasma current profile broadens and begins decaying resistively. The decaying current generates a toroidal electric field which can accelerate REs; however, RE beam formation appears to be limited in MGI shutdowns. Presently, it is thought that the conducted heat flux and halo current mitigation qualities of the MGI shutdown technique will scale well to a reactor-sized tokamak. However, because of the larger RE gain from avalanching and the presence of a RE seed population due to Compton-scattered fast electrons, it is possible that a RE beam can be formed well into the CQ, after the flux surfaces initially destroyed by the TQ MHD have had time to heal. Crucial MGI issues to be studied in present devices are therefore the formation, amplification, and transport of RE and the transport of impurities into the core plasma (important because the presence of impurities can, via collisional drag, help suppress RE amplification). In the study of impurity transport, both neutral delivery (directly driven into the core by the jet pressure) and ion delivery (mixed into the core by MHD) are of interest, as both contribute to RE drag. Here, three new results relevant to RE suppression from MGI are presented: (1) evidence is presented that neutral jet propagation is stopped by toroidal magnetic field pressure, (2) MGI appears to cause the CQ to begin before sufficient impurities have been injected for complete collisional suppression of RE, and (3) flux surface destruction over the region q {le} 2 occurs during the TQ. The first result suggests that neutrals cannot be delivered to the core of large tokamak discharges by MGI, even during the CQ. The second result indicates that (at least for argon MGI in DIII-D), insufficient impurities (either neutral or ion) are delivered for collisional suppression of RE at the start of the CQ. The last result suggests that the destruction of good field lines resulting from MGI is quite extensive and should be sufficient to prevent RE formation, at least at the start of the CQ.

Hollmann, E; Jernigan, T; Antar, G; Bakhtiari, M; Boedo, J; Combs, S; Evans, T; Gray, D; Groth, M; Humphreys, D; Lasnier, C; Moyer, R; Parks, P; Rudakov, D; Strait, E; Wesley, J; West, W; Whyte, D; Yu, J

2006-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

257

Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self-presentation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This study examined how differences in expectations about meeting impacted the degree of deceptive self-presentation individuals displayed within the context of dating. Participants filled out personality measures in one of four anticipated meeting conditions: ... Keywords: Gender differences, Internet, Mate selection, Personality, Self-presentation

Rosanna E. Guadagno; Bradley M. Okdie; Sara A. Kruse

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

A SCOPING STUDY: Development of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Models for Reactivity Insertion Accidents During Shutdown In U.S. Commercial Light Water Reactors  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the scoping study of developing generic simplified fuel damage risk models for quantitative analysis from inadvertent reactivity insertion events during shutdown (SD) in light water pressurized and boiling water reactors. In the past, nuclear fuel reactivity accidents have been analyzed both mainly deterministically and probabilistically for at-power and SD operations of nuclear power plants (NPPs). Since then, many NPPs had power up-rates and longer refueling intervals, which resulted in fuel configurations that may potentially respond differently (in an undesirable way) to reactivity accidents. Also, as shown in a recent event, several inadvertent operator actions caused potential nuclear fuel reactivity insertion accident during SD operations. The set inadvertent operator actions are likely to be plant- and operation-state specific and could lead to accident sequences. This study is an outcome of the concern which arose after the inadvertent withdrawal of control rods at Dresden Unit 3 in 2008 due to operator actions in the plant inadvertently three control rods were withdrawn from the reactor without knowledge of the main control room operator. The purpose of this Standardized Plant Analysis Risk (SPAR) Model development project is to develop simplified SPAR Models that can be used by staff analysts to perform risk analyses of operating events and/or conditions occurring during SD operation. These types of accident scenarios are dominated by the operator actions, (e.g., misalignment of valves, failure to follow procedures and errors of commissions). Human error probabilities specific to this model were assessed using the methodology developed for SPAR model human error evaluations. The event trees, fault trees, basic event data and data sources for the model are provided in the report. The end state is defined as the reactor becomes critical. The scoping study includes a brief literature search/review of historical events, developments of a small set of comprehensive event trees and fault trees and recommendation for future work.

S. Khericha

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

Data Administration Area: Date Issued  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Policy Data Administration Policy Area: Date Issued: April, 1994 Title: Data Administration Last. INTRODUCTION The President established the Committee on Data Administration (CODA) in May, 1992, to advise him on policies in the area of data administration (attached as references Policy ADC 011 and TOR for CODA

Brownstone, Rob

260

Effective Date: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

complementary goals in aviation and future space transportation, to coordinate planning efforts, and to haveEffective Date: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION IN AVIATION AND SPACE TRANSPORTATION I. PURPOSE The Department of TransportatiodFederal Aviation

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

UNDERGRADUATE HANDBOOK 2011 Final Dates  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

............................................................................................................... Friday 23 September Last day for receipt of applications to enrol for 2012 through UAC without financial to be confirmed. Semester & session dates for 2012 First Semester Information Systems Head of School and Professor of Accounting FARGHER, Professor Neil L., BCom Melb MBus RMIT

262

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0-001-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-10-0005 Operations Systems Development & Integration Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: The Categorical Exclusion B1.7, Applicable to Facility Operations...

263

Save the Date - NTSF 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Save the Date Save the Date U.S. Department of Energy National Transportation Stakeholders Forum May 14-16 th , 2013 Buffalo, New York Please mark your calendar to attend the next meeting of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Transportation Stakeholders Forum (NTSF) scheduled for May 14-16, 2013. This annual event will be held at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, located near the downtown business and entertainment districts in Buffalo, New York. The 2013 meeting is co-sponsored by DOE's Offices of Environmental Management and Nuclear Energy and follows several highly successful yearly gatherings. It is co-hosted by the Council of State Governments Eastern Regional Conference and the Northeast High-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation Task Force.

264

Simulation System on the Thermal Stress and Fatigue Life Loss of Startup and Shutdown for a Domestic 600MW Steam Turbo Generator Unit  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Simulation System on the thermal stresses and fatigue life loss of the rotator during startup and shutdown for a domestic 600MW steam turbo generator unit, By means of the analysis of Simulation System on the thermal stress and life loss of the rotor, ... Keywords: steam turbine unit, thermal stress, Fatigue Life Loss, rotator, startup, shutdown

Yunchun Xia

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

BEVATRON OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. XXXIII. Period Covered February- April 1962  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Experimental work consisted of one new run started and completed this quarter, and the completion of one of the three continuing runs. Of the scheduled operating time, the beam was on for 69.4% of the time, 2.3% of the time was used for experimental setup, and equipment outage took 29.3% of the time. There were two scheduled and two impromptu shutdowns. During one of the scheduled shutdowns the external-beam extraction magnets were installed in the east and south tangent tanks. The other scheduled shutdown was to readjust the Bevatron magnet elevation to correct for foundation subsidence. Internal magnets were also installed. In the new linac development program the ion source was run at 480 kv with a beam current of 100 ma. The linac tank was partially deplated to provide a clean copper surface, and welds and holes were plated with copper. The r-f losses were thereby reduced 20%. (auth)

Crebbin, K.C.; Wenzel, W.A.; Lothrop, F.H.G.; Johnson, R.M.

1963-02-12T23:59:59.000Z

266

Request Log Closedl Date Yes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 FOIA 6 FOIA - Request Log Closedl Date Yes 01 127106 Yes 02/23/06 Yes 04/05/06 Yes 04/03/06 Yes 04/03/06 Yes 05/22/06 Yes 35/30/06 - No. - 00 1 - 002 - 003 - 004 005 006 - 307 - Dated 01 125106 0211 6106 03/29/06 03/31 106 14/03/06 1511 8/06 )5/22/06 Date Rec'd 0 I I2 5/06 02/23/06 03130/06 0313 1 106 04/03/06 05/22/06 05/22/06 HQ or Dir. Direct Transfer from HQ Direct Trans from HQ Direct Direct Transfer 'rom HQ Subject Requesting a list of all your Procurement card holders Requesting copies of any and all Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests submitted to the Department of Energy (DOE) by Donna Wright, the Bradenton Herald, or any other individual that requested documentation or information pertaining to the Loral American Beryllium Corporation (also known as the

267

Environmental Assessment for U-233 Stabilization, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

74 74 Environmental Assessment for U-233 Stabilization, and Building 3019 Complex Shutdown at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee U. S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Office Oak Ridge, Tennessee March 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................... vi 1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED....................................................................................................1 1.2 BACKGROUND/OVERVIEW.........................................................................................1

268

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Determinations By Date September 24, 2012 CX-009335: Categorical Exclusion Determination E85 (Ethanol) Retail Fueling Infrastructure Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 0924...

269

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

By Date April 11, 2011 CX-005702: Categorical Exclusion Determination Residential Ground Source Heat Pump Installation - Schmitz, Mary C. Date: 04112011 Location(s): Minnesota...

270

OMB No. 1905-0175 Expiration Date: 12/31/2011 Version No ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

CURRENT POST-EMERGENCY PLANT OPERATIONAL STATUS MMcf/Day Expiration Date: 12/31/2011 OMB No. 1905-0175 FORM EIA-757 Schedule B: Emergency Status ...

271

REFERENCE: INSPECTORS: DATE OF REPORT:  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SITE: Installations for monitoring and controlling radioactive discharges and for surveillance of the environment in Lithuania during normal operations of the Ignalina nuclear power plant

Ignalina Nuclear; Power Plant; Mr S. Van Der Stricht; Mr V. Tanner; Mr P. Beuseling; Mr Y-h; Bouget France; Ms A. Godeanu Metz (trainee; Y-h Bouget; A. Godeanu Metz; P. Beuseling

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Procedure: The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Pantex Plant and Associated Storage of Nuclear Weapons, also known as the Site Wide EIS,...

273

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 5, 2009 August 5, 2009 CX-000510: Categorical Exclusion Determination Isolation of Domestic and Fire Water Lines, 710-B CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/05/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office August 5, 2009 CX-000507: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building. 728-N Cut and Grout Domestic Water and Plant Air Lines CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/05/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office August 5, 2009 CX-000508: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electrical Isolation of Building 710-B CX(s) Applied: B4.10 Date: 08/05/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office August 5, 2009

274

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8004: Categorical Exclusion Determination 8004: Categorical Exclusion Determination Siting, Construction, Modifying, and Operating Small-Scale Structures CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office November 28, 2011 CX-007758: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nuclear Engineering Teaching and Research Facilities Upgrade at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office November 28, 2011 CX-007757: Categorical Exclusion Determination Multipurpose Target Chamber for High-Temperature Ion Irradation - University of Tennessee CX(s) Applied: B3.10 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office

275

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

20, 2012 20, 2012 CX-008626: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace 607-6A Sanitary Sewer Lift Station CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 20, 2012 CX-008625: Categorical Exclusion Determination Abandonment of M-Area Oil Injection Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 20, 2012 CX-008624: Categorical Exclusion Determination Abandonment of the Western Sector Dynamic Underground Stripping (DUS) Project Steam Injection Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 20, 2012 CX-008623: Categorical Exclusion Determination Perform Thermal Analysis and Thermal Exposures (TG-DTA)

276

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2012 0, 2012 CX-008625: Categorical Exclusion Determination Abandonment of M-Area Oil Injection Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 20, 2012 CX-008624: Categorical Exclusion Determination Abandonment of the Western Sector Dynamic Underground Stripping (DUS) Project Steam Injection Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 20, 2012 CX-008623: Categorical Exclusion Determination Perform Thermal Analysis and Thermal Exposures (TG-DTA) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 20, 2012 CX-008546: Categorical Exclusion Determination National Open-ocean Energy Laboratory

277

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

15, 2013 15, 2013 CX-010034: Categorical Exclusion Determination Deactivation and Decommissioning of Soil Vapor Extraction Units CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 01/15/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office January 15, 2013 CX-010033: Categorical Exclusion Determination Savannah River National Laboratory Electrolyzer 30 weight % Sulfuric Acid pH Adjustment CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/15/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office January 15, 2013 CX-010032: Categorical Exclusion Determination Separation of the Minor Actinides from the Lanthanides with Magnetic Fields CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/15/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office January 15, 2013 CX-009928: Categorical Exclusion Determination

278

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 5, 2010 January 5, 2010 CX-000802: Categorical Exclusion Determination Transmission Electron Microscopy Specimen Preparation by Electropolishing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/05/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office January 5, 2010 CX-000803: Categorical Exclusion Determination Production of Hazardous Enhanced Chemical Cleaning Sludge Simulants CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/05/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office January 5, 2010 CX-000804: Categorical Exclusion Determination 9975, 9977 and 9978 Annual Maintenance and Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/05/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

279

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2011 9, 2011 CX-006404: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install a Pressure Regulator and Relief Valve on the Tank 26 Flush Water Piping CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/19/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office May 19, 2011 CX-006403: Categorical Exclusion Determination Enhanced Low Activity Waste Disposal Premix Silo Area Modifications CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/19/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office May 19, 2011 CX-006402: Categorical Exclusion Determination 704-N Wireless Access CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/19/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office May 19, 2011

280

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2012 1, 2012 CX-008748: Categorical Exclusion Determination Automated Serial Sectioning and Imaging in Support of Nuclear Materials Analysis - Colorado School of Mines CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/21/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office May 21, 2012 CX-008747: Categorical Exclusion Determination Developing the Currently Existing Nuclear Instrumentation and Radiation Research Laboratories at Alcorn State University CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 05/21/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office May 21, 2012 CX-008746: Categorical Exclusion Determination Reactor Infrastructure Improvement at Kansas State University Nuclear Reactor - Kansas State University CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 05/21/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2011 30, 2011 CX-007657: Categorical Exclusion Determination Preparation of Phase-Pure Standards CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/30/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 30, 2011 CX-007656: Categorical Exclusion Determination Operation of Extrel MAX300LG Mass Spectrometer and VICI Metronics Dynacalibrator Calibration Gas Generator at 999-1W CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/30/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 30, 2011 CX-007398: Categorical Exclusion Determination Scalable High-Efficiency Thin-Crystalline Silicon Cells Enabled by Light-Trapping Nanostructures CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 11/30/2011 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): Golden Field Office November 30, 2011 CX-007580: Categorical Exclusion Determination

282

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2010 7, 2010 CX-004846: Categorical Exclusion Determination Work in the High Pressure Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/17/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 17, 2010 CX-004844: Categorical Exclusion Determination B-Wing High Activity Drain Exhaust (HADE) Filter Housing CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/17/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 17, 2010 CX-004843: Categorical Exclusion Determination Stable Electrocatalysts for High Temperature Fuel Cells CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/17/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 17, 2010 CX-004841: Categorical Exclusion Determination Scanned Probe Microscopy Surface Analysis and Sample Preparation

283

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 9, 2009 September 9, 2009 CX-000527: Categorical Exclusion Determination Paving of Gravel Road from Road E to Gate 16 CX(s) Applied: B1.13 Date: 09/09/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office September 9, 2009 CX-000526: Categorical Exclusion Determination M-Area Chemical Oxidation (MACO) CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 09/09/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office September 9, 2009 CX-000525: Categorical Exclusion Determination Isolation of Fire Water System, 261-H Consolidated Incineration Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 09/09/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office

284

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2012 7, 2012 CX-009619: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dissolution of Sludge Constituents in Glycolate-Containing 2H Evaporator Rad Feed Solution CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 7, 2012 CX-009618: Categorical Exclusion Determination Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Radar Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 11/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 7, 2012 CX-009617: Categorical Exclusion Determination Gas Mass Spectrometry CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/07/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 7, 2012 CX-009432: Categorical Exclusion Determination Transformational Approach to Reducing the Total System Costs of Building

285

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2010 5, 2010 CX-003956: Categorical Exclusion Determination L Area Disassembly Basin Rack Removal / Installation Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/15/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office September 15, 2010 CX-003955: Categorical Exclusion Determination Column Loading of Crystalline Silicotitanate CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/15/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office September 15, 2010 CX-003954: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sample Analyses for Site Characterization Programs and Work for Others CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/15/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office September 15, 2010 CX-003953: Categorical Exclusion Determination

286

AVESTAR® - Training - Gasification Process Operations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Gasification Process Operations Gasification Process Operations This course is designed as a familiarization course to increase understanding of the gasification with CO2 capture process. During the training, participants will startup and shutdown the simulated unit in an integrated manner and will be exposed to simple and complex unit malfunctions in the control room and in the field. Course objectives are as follows: Introduce trainees to gasification and CO2 capture process systems and major components and how they dynamically interact Familiarize trainees with the Human Machine Interface (HMI) and plant control and how safe and efficient operation of the unit can be affected by plant problems Provide the trainees with hands-on operating experiences in plant operations using the HMI

287

2014 NEJC Save the Date (Spanish)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

2014 National Environmental Justice Conference and Training Program Save the Date, March 26 to 28, 2014

288

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-C 2-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-11-0004 Operations Systems Development & Integration Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: The Categorical Exclusion B4.6, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B), applies to project number LIN- 11-002-C. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Pantex Site Office, proposed an Operations Systems Development and Integration (OSD&I) project in Fiscal Year 2010, under project number LIN-10-001-C, to replace the existing functionality being performed by MRP-II/CAS. The project would enhance manufacturing operations utilizing modern software solutions. The project also would provide a technology refresh with added capability. NEPA Review Form PXP-10-0005 determined that

289

Summary of potassium/argon age dating, 1979  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

During FY-79 the K/Ar dating laboratory at the Department of Geology and Geophysics of the University of Utah became operational. During the past calendar year forty-seven dates have been produced from areas predominantly in Utah. Dating has also been done on areas in Nevada and Montana through the State-Coupled program and Case Studies Support program. Areas in wich activity was concentrated include: Cove Creek Domes/Twin Peaks Area, SW Utah. Here volcanic activity spanned the time from 2.74 to 2.35 M.Y., with a mean age of 2.50 +- 0.14 M.Y. Black Rock Desert, SW Utah. Two dates on a single flow indicate an age of 1.49 +- 0.08 M.Y. for a flow previously undated. Wildcat Creek Area, SW Utah. Dating of rhyolite flows from this area gives a mean age of volcanism of 9.25 +- 0.16 M.Y., considerably older than previously inferred by the work of Haugh (1978). Mineral Mountains Pluton, SW Utah. Twelve dates on phases of the pluton indicate a complex history of intrusion, and more work is indicated in order to derive a coherent picture of the magmatic events leading to the formation of this batholith. Blackfoot Reservoir, Idaho. Two dates on rhyolite domes, previously updated, give ages of 1.56 +- 0.06 M.Y. and 1.28 +- 0.15 M.Y.

Evans, S.H. Jr.

1980-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Estimated Cost Description Determination Date:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title, Location Title, Location Estimated Cost Description Determination Date: 2010 LCLS Undulator 2 is envisioned to be a 0.2 - 2keV FEL x-ray source, capable of delivering x-rays to End Station A (ESA), located in the existing Research Yard at SLAC. It will also be configurable as a non- FEL hard x-ray source capable of delivering a chirped x-ray pulse for single-shot broad-spectrum measurements. The project would entail reconstruction of the electron beam transport to End Station A, construction and installation of a new undulator in the tunnel upstream of ESA and beam dump, and construction and installation of x-ray transport, optics, and diagnostics in ESA. It also includes the construction of an annex to End Station A , providing hutches for experiment stations.

291

Project Title: VIscosity Reduction Date:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4t 3 4t 3 l I Project lnfonnatlon Project Title: VIscosity Reduction Date: 11-22-2010 DOE Code: 673()-()20-51141 Contractor Code: 8067-778 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview 1. The purpose of the project is to test a tool that temporarily reduces the viscosity of oil which allows it to be 1. Brief project description ~nclude pumped through pipelines easier. The test will require about 4 miles of line to pump the oil through after anything that could impact the treatment (hence the need to connect the 31oops together), a holding volume for recovery, then repeat. environmenJ] There will be tanks to hold the original volume, tanks to receive the volume after treatment and pumping 2. Legal location through the line, possible transfer between tanks, transport (trucking) of the oil to the site (by the COC) and

292

Annual Report of the EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Programme 2009/10 3 JET Operations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

dictated by remote handling considerations, which are the Operator's responsibility. 3.5.1 ENHANCED RADIAL and procurements required to install the new wall. Because most of the installation will be by remote handling In previous shutdowns, all in-vessel remote handling operations have been carried out with a single long boom

293

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2011 7, 2011 CX-007075: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wisconsin-City-Green Bay CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 09/27/2011 Location(s): Green Bay, Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Savannah River Operations Office September 27, 2011 CX-006971: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Energy Coalition - Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: A7, B5.1 Date: 09/27/2011 Location(s): Detroit, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Savannah River Operations Office September 27, 2011 CX-006969: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Energy Coalition - Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 09/27/2011 Location(s): Plymouth, Michigan Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Savannah River

294

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2010 7, 2010 CX-003667: Categorical Exclusion Determination Slit Trench 1 - 5 Closure Activity CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 07/27/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 27, 2010 CX-003666: Categorical Exclusion Determination D-Area Chemical Truck Unloading Station CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 07/27/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 27, 2010 CX-003247: Categorical Exclusion Determination Alaska-Tribe-Hoonah Indian Association CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 07/27/2010 Location(s): Alaska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 27, 2010 CX-003503: Categorical Exclusion Determination Water and Energy Emergency End Use Demand Management Measures CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1

295

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2012 4, 2012 CX-009062: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dismantle and Remove Low Level Waste Loading Station, Building 735-A CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 24, 2012 CX-009061: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Development Wet Chemistry Methods CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 24, 2012 CX-008603: Categorical Exclusion Determination South Dakota Program year 2012 State Energy Plan CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 07/24/2012 Location(s): South Dakota Offices(s): Golden Field Office July 24, 2012 CX-008594: Categorical Exclusion Determination Idaho Program Year 2012 State Energy Program Formula Grants

296

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 4, 2012 June 4, 2012 CX-008633: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dismantlement and Removal of 321-M Solvent Storage Tank Area Dynamic Underground Stripping (DUS I) Remnants CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/04/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 4, 2012 CX-008632: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sampling of Soil Vapor Extraction Wells at the Western Sector Dynamic Underground Stripping System CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/04/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office June 4, 2012 CX-008482: Categorical Exclusion Determination Composite Riser for Ultra-Deepwater High Pressure Wells CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 06/04/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory June 4, 2012

297

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2009 6, 2009 CX-000541: Categorical Exclusion Determination Checkout of StreamPro ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler) Velocity Meter CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office November 16, 2009 CX-000540: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative Americium/Curium separations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office November 16, 2009 CX-006654: Categorical Exclusion Determination B-1-28 Test Site Reclamation CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.28, B6.1 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Casper, Wyoming Office(s): RMOTC November 16, 2009 CX-006660: Categorical Exclusion Determination

298

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10, 2010 10, 2010 CX-004043: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pier 2 Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08/10/2010 Location(s): San Francisco, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 10, 2010 CX-003971: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bench Scale Process Development - In-Line Mixing Study CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/10/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 10, 2010 CX-003632: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analysis of Evaporator Scale Sample CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/10/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 10, 2010 CX-003631: Categorical Exclusion Determination Asbestos Removal in Spent Fuel Project (SFP) Facilities

299

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14, 2013 14, 2013 CX-010493: Categorical Exclusion Determination Determining Distribution Coefficients by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 14, 2013 CX-010492: Categorical Exclusion Determination Permeation Testing Metals, Ceramics, and Polymers CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 14, 2013 CX-010282: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low Temperature Nitrous Oxide Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 14, 2013 CX-010281: Categorical Exclusion Determination

300

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2012 6, 2012 CX-008983: Categorical Exclusion Determination Heliostat System with Wireless Closed-Loop Control CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/06/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office August 3, 2012 CX-009223: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Asbestos Removal Actions CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 08/03/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office August 3, 2012 CX-009052: Categorical Exclusion Determination Remove the Highpoint VAMP ED-641000-IT-RISH-6097A From Service CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 08/03/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 3, 2012 CX-009093: Categorical Exclusion Determination Knolls Laboratory Q14 Sprinkler System Upgrade Project

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2009 8, 2009 CX-000392: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas Energy Gasification Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9 Date: 12/08/2009 Location(s): Beaumont, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory December 8, 2009 CX-000820: Categorical Exclusion Determination Vacuum Induction Melting of Metals CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/08/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office December 8, 2009 CX-000818: Categorical Exclusion Determination Scanned Probe Microscopy Surface Analysis and Sample Preparation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/08/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office December 7, 2009 CX-005086: Categorical Exclusion Determination

302

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2013 8, 2013 CX-010148: Categorical Exclusion Determination Merritt Radio Station Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/18/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration April 18, 2013 CX-010319: Categorical Exclusion Determination General Chemical Support Operations for NHS, HP CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/18/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office April 18, 2013 CX-010554: Categorical Exclusion Determination Yale University- Power Generation from Waste Heat with Closed Loop Membrane-Based System CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/18/2013 Location(s): Connecticut, Colorado Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy April 17, 2013 CX-010188: Categorical Exclusion Determination Field Demonstration of a Novel Eco-Friendly Production Enhancement Process

303

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 4, 2012 October 4, 2012 CX-009220: Categorical Exclusion Determination CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company - Siting, Construction, and Operation of Support Buildings and Support Structures CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 10/04/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office October 4, 2012 CX-009170: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low Cost Arc-Fault Detection and Protection for Photovoltaic Systems-Tigo Energy, Inc. CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: CX: none Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office October 3, 2012 CX-009410: Categorical Exclusion Determination Granby (Farr) Pumping Plant Nest Removal Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 10/03/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration October 2, 2012 CX-009219: Categorical Exclusion Determination

304

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006067: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indoor Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006065: Categorical Exclusion Determination Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office

305

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2011 3, 2011 CX-006354: Categorical Exclusion Determination Extraction and Recovery of Lignin and Hemicellulose from Biomass CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/23/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 23, 2011 CX-006353: Categorical Exclusion Determination Grout Formulation and Variability Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/23/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 23, 2011 CX-006349: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohio-City-Cuyahoga Falls CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 06/23/2011 Location(s): Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 23, 2011 CX-006347: Categorical Exclusion Determination

306

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 29, 2012 November 29, 2012 CX-009633: Categorical Exclusion Determination Upgrade to the Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) Wall at Test Reactor Area (TRA)-670 CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 11/29/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office November 29, 2012 CX-009608: Categorical Exclusion Determination Refurbish 607-53C Sanitary Sewer Lift Station CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/29/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 28, 2012 CX-009552: Categorical Exclusion Determination Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility CX(s) Applied: B5.20 Date: 11/28/2012 Location(s): Vermont Offices(s): Golden Field Office November 28, 2012 CX-009547: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Advanced Seismic Data Analysis Program ('Hot Pot Project')

307

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August 1, 2013 August 1, 2013 CX-010819: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program - Field Trial - Site Three CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B3.6 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 1, 2013 CX-010835: Categorical Exclusion Determination Disconnect Equipment and Activate Gloveboxes From Lab 174, Gloveboxes 12 & 13 CX(s) Applied: B2.3 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 1, 2013 CX-010834: Categorical Exclusion Determination 704-L Machine Shop Equipment Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 1, 2013 CX-010818: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program - Field Trial - Site Three

308

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2013 1, 2013 CX-010818: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program - Field Trial - Site Three CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 1, 2013 CX-010833: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subcontractor Will Clean Out Gutters Causing Leaks in 706-N CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 1, 2013 CX-010832: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subcontractor Will Perform Roof Leak Repairs on 717-8N CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 1, 2013 CX-010817: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program - Field Trial - Site Three

309

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2013 , 2013 CX-010820: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program - Field Trial - Site Three CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B3.6 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 1, 2013 CX-010837: Categorical Exclusion Determination Disassembly, Relocation, and Reassembly of a Metal-framed Quonset Hut CX(s) Applied: B1.22 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 1, 2013 CX-010836: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subcontractor Roof Repair at 717-12S CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/01/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 1, 2013 CX-010819: Categorical Exclusion Determination Technology Integration Program - Field Trial - Site Three

310

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 16, 2013 July 16, 2013 CX-010858: Categorical Exclusion Determination Demolition of the 745-N Excess Equipment Pad CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/16/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 16, 2013 CX-010857: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace 735-A South Header Ductwork Located on D-wing Service Floor CX(s) Applied: B2.3 Date: 07/16/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 15, 2013 CX-010738: Categorical Exclusion Determination 2013 Spacer and Insulator Replacement Program; Third and Fourth Quarter Projects CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/15/2013 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 15, 2013 CX-010717: Categorical Exclusion Determination

311

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2010 30, 2010 CX-004105: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Resolution Three-Dimensional Laser Imaging for Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Houston, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 30, 2010 CX-004100: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Resolution Three-Dimensional Laser Imaging for Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Boulder, Colorado Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory September 30, 2010 CX-004099: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Efficient Building Technologies for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09/30/2010 Location(s): Eugene, Oregon

312

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

19, 2013 19, 2013 CX-010614: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Criteria for Flashback Propensity in Jet Flames for High H2 Content and Natural Gas Fuels CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.6 Date: 07/19/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory July 18, 2013 CX-010854: Categorical Exclusion Determination 906-T Air Stripper Dismantle and Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 07/18/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 18, 2013 CX-010853: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Methods for Radiochemical Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/18/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 18, 2013 CX-010852: Categorical Exclusion Determination

313

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2011 8, 2011 CX-007758: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nuclear Engineering Teaching and Research Facilities Upgrade at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office November 28, 2011 CX-007757: Categorical Exclusion Determination Multipurpose Target Chamber for High-Temperature Ion Irradation - University of Tennessee CX(s) Applied: B3.10 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office November 28, 2011 CX-008003: Categorical Exclusion Determination Microbiological and Biomedical Research Projects CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Science, Pacific Northwest Site Office November 28, 2011

314

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2012 3, 2012 CX-007776: Categorical Exclusion Determination Placing a Facility in an Environmentally Safe Condition CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007775: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation or Relocation of Machinery and Equipment CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office January 13, 2012 CX-007547: Categorical Exclusion Determination Turbine Aeration Design Software for Mitigating Adverse Environmental Impacts Resulting From Conventional Hydropower Turbines CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 01/13/2012 Location(s): Minnesota Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 13, 2012 CX-007609: Categorical Exclusion Determination

315

Rapid shutdown experiments with one and two gas jets on Alcator C-Mod  

SciTech Connect

Massive gas injection rapid shutdown experiments have been conducted on the Alcator C-Mod tokamak using two toroidally separated gas injectors, in order to investigate the effect of multiple gas injection locations on the toroidal asymmetry in the radiated power. Toroidal radiation asymmetry is diagnosed by an array of six single-channel photodiodes mounted on the vessel wall. The presence of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) activity is diagnosed using an array of magnetic pickup (Mirnov) coils, mounted on stalks on the vessel wall. Scans were conducted of the relative timing between the two jets, of the 95th percentile safety factor, and of the plasma elongation. It is observed that firing the two gas jets so that the injected impurities arrive at the plasma at nearly the same time produced an increase in the toroidal radiation asymmetry. In addition, the radiation asymmetry in the thermal quench phase correlates with the growth rate of low toroidal mode number MHD modes, indicating that these mode(s) are playing a role in setting the radiation asymmetry.

OlynykPlasma Scien, G. [Plasma Sciences and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)] [Plasma Sciences and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Granetz, R. S. [Plasma Sciences and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)] [Plasma Sciences and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Reinke, M. L. [Plasma Sciences and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)] [Plasma Sciences and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Whyte, D. G. [Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)] [Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Golfinopoulos, T. [Plasma Sciences and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)] [Plasma Sciences and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Hughes, J. [Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)] [Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Walk, J. [Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)] [Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Izzo, V. A. [University of California, San Diego & La Jolla] [University of California, San Diego & La Jolla; Combs, Stephen Kirk [ORNL] [ORNL; Milora, Stanley L [ORNL] [ORNL; Brookman, M. W. [University of Texas Fusion Research Center, Austin, TX] [University of Texas Fusion Research Center, Austin, TX

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

An analysis of multiple particle settling for LMR backup shutdown systems  

SciTech Connect

Backup shutdown systems proposed for future LMRs may employ discreet absorber particles to provide the negative reactivity insertion. When actuated, these systems release a dense packing of particles from an out-of-core region to settle into an in-core region. The multiple particle settling behavior is analyzed by the method of continuity waves. This method provides predictions of the dynamic response of the system including the average particle velocity and volume fraction of particles vs. time. Although hindered settling problems have been previously analyzed using continuity wave theory, this application represents an extension of the theory to conditions of unrestrained settling. Typical cases are analyzed and numerical results are calculated based on a semi-empirical drift-flux model. For 1/4-inch diameter boron-carbide particles in hot liquid sodium, the unrestrained settling problem assumes a steady-state solution when the average volume fraction of particles is 0.295 and the average particle velocity is 26.0 cm/s.

Brock, R.W. [Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL (United States)

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

317

Novel Hybrid Monte Carlo/Deterministic Technique for Shutdown Dose Rate Analyses of Fusion Energy Systems  

SciTech Connect

The rigorous 2-step (R2S) method uses three-dimensional Monte Carlo transport simulations to calculate the shutdown dose rate (SDDR) in fusion reactors. Accurate full-scale R2S calculations are impractical in fusion reactors because they require calculating space- and energy-dependent neutron fluxes everywhere inside the reactor. The use of global Monte Carlo variance reduction techniques was suggested for accelerating the neutron transport calculation of the R2S method. The prohibitive computational costs of these approaches, which increase with the problem size and amount of shielding materials, inhibit their use in the accurate full-scale neutronics analyses of fusion reactors. This paper describes a novel hybrid Monte Carlo/deterministic technique that uses the Consistent Adjoint Driven Importance Sampling (CADIS) methodology but focuses on multi-step shielding calculations. The Multi-Step CADIS (MS-CADIS) method speeds up the Monte Carlo neutron calculation of the R2S method using an importance function that represents the importance of the neutrons to the final SDDR. Using a simplified example, preliminarily results showed that the use of MS-CADIS enhanced the efficiency of the neutron Monte Carlo simulation of an SDDR calculation by a factor of 550 compared to standard global variance reduction techniques, and that the increase over analog Monte Carlo is higher than 10,000.

Ibrahim, Ahmad M [ORNL; Peplow, Douglas E. [ORNL; Peterson, Joshua L [ORNL; Grove, Robert E [ORNL

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

318

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-C 2-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-10-0004 Deactivation & Decommissioning of the North Compost Tent Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusion B1.23, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B), applies to the proposed activity. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), proposes to demolish Environmental Restoration's (ER) North Compost Tent, which was damaged by a storm in 2003 and has not been fully operational since then. It is considered unsalvageable by the Facility & Systems Design Department. Demolition will consist of: Removal of clay soil (approximately 1 foot deep) and two liners (polyvinylchloride and

319

Working Copy Effective Date 10/08/08  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Drawing · DOE/WIPP 90-45, Remote-Handled Transuranic Content Codes (RH- TRUCON) · Contact-HandledWorking Copy Effective Date 10/08/08 WP 08-PT.16 Revision 0 Shielded Container Assembly Handling #12;Working Copy Shielded Container Assembly Handling and Operation Manual WP 08-PT.16, Rev. 0 TABLE

320

Date OCE Title Presenter / Sponsoring  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

/20/12 Integrated Design and Operation of Smart Power Plants in the Modern Grid Era Dr. Debangsu Bhattacharyya 10 5:30PM G05 Evansdale Residential Complex 13 2/8/12 Advanced control and monitoring of plant growth

Mohaghegh, Shahab

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

,"U.S. Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

U.S. Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators",3,"Annual",2012,"6301935" ,"Release Date:","9302013" ,"Next Release Date:","10312013" ,"Excel File Name:","ngstorsumd...

322

Markovian reliability analysis under uncertainty with an application on the shutdown system of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor  

SciTech Connect

A methodology for the assessment of uncertainties about reliability of nuclear reactor systems described by markov models is developed, and the uncertainties about the failure probability of the shutdown system of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor (CRBR) are assessed. Failure and repair rates and all other inputs of reliability analysis are taken as random variables with known probability distribution functions (pdf's). The pdf of reliability is calculated by both a Monte Carlo simulation and a Taylor series expansion approximation. Three techniques are developed to reduce the computational effort: ordering of system states, merging of Markov processes, and judicious choice of time steps. A Markov model has been used for reliability analysis under uncertainty of the shutdown system of the CRBR. It accounts for common-cause failures, interdependences between unavailability of the system and occurrence of transients, and inspection and maintenance procedures that depend on the state of the system and that include possibility of human errors. Under these conditions, the failure probability of the shutdown system differs significantly from that computed without common-cause failures, human errors, and input uncertainties.

Papazoglou, I.A.; Gyftopoulos, E.P.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09-C 09-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-11-0006 Environmental Restoration & Waste Mgt. Activities, FY 2012-2013 Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: The Categorical Exclusions B6.1 and B6.2, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B), apply to project number ESH-11-009-C. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Pantex Site Office, proposes Environmental Restoration & Waste Management Activities for Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013 under project number ESH-11-009-C. These activities could include: Remedial actions, including design, construction, and operation of corrective measures (e.g., landfill covers and soil remediation activities);  Accelerated soil cleanups;

324

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-C 1-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-11-0002 HPFL Tank & Pump Replacement Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusion B1.15, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B), applies to this proposal. Therefore, neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is necessary for the activity described in NEPA Review Form (NRF) PXP-11-0002, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, proposes to construct and operate two new high pressure fire loop (HPFL) pump houses and tank facilities at the B&W Pantex Facility to replace aging existing facilities. Construction and staging areas would require approximately one acre of land disturbance for each facility.

325

Operation and Maintenance Guidelines for Selective Catalytic Reduction Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is the 2010 version of Operation and Maintenance Guidelines for Selective Catalytic Reduction Systems, originally published in 2001 and updated annually. New content this year includes: (1) A section on static mixers added in Chapter 3; (2) Substantial expansion of the discussion on inspection of ammonia storage and delivery equipment in Chapter 8; (3) Expanded coverage of unit startup, shutdown, and low-load operation in Chapter 15; (4) a new chapter, Chapter 18, on the means to ensure tha...

2010-11-29T23:59:59.000Z

326

Page 1 of 22 Building Num: Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Check List Page 1 of 22 Building Num: Date: Compressed Gases/WeldingChecklist Title: Action stored away from flammable materials? 1910.252(a)(2)(i) #12;Check List Page 2 of 22 Building Num: Date)(D) Is the insulation material intact on welding machine rod holders? 1910.254(d)(9)(i) #12;Check List Page 3 of 22

Homes, Christopher C.

327

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28, 2011 28, 2011 CX-007772: Categorical Exclusion Determination Idaho National Laboratory Asphalt Repair Project - North Wind Services, LLC CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office November 28, 2011 CX-007771: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nuclear Energy University Programs Minor Reactor Upgrade Request for Enhancement of Safety and Operational Monitoring Systems and Research Capabilities of the Ohio State University Nuclear Reactor Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office November 28, 2011 CX-007770: Categorical Exclusion Determination Meeting Nuclear Uniform Curriculum Program Requirements with Equipment Investments - Lakeshore Technical College

328

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2012 5, 2012 CX-009659: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Actions to Conserve Energy or Water under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009658: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Small-Scale Research and Development, Laboratory Operations, and Pilot Projects under 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): River Protection-Richland Operations Office December 5, 2012 CX-009657: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mission Support Alliance Annual Categorical Exclusion for Site

329

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-C 3-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-10-0007 Demolition of Buildings 11-10 and 11-30 Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusion B1.23, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B), applies to the proposed activity described below. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), proposes to demolish Buildings 11-10 and 11-30 at the Pantex Plant. The overall objectives are to reduce Plant maintenance costs and reduce the Pantex Plant footprint by 3,144 square feet. Building 11-10 is approximately 929 square feet, single story, slab on grade, brick structure with a shingle roof. The interior of the building consists of only two rooms separated by a masonry wall. An asbestos

330

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

D&D-10-001-C D&D-10-001-C NEPA ID No. PXP-10-0001 Amendment No. 10-010 Decontamination & Demolition of Residential and Farm Structures Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusions B1.23 and B6.1(c), Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B), apply to the proposed activities. Therefore, neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is necessary for the activities described in Amendment No. 10-010 of NEPA Review Form (NRF) PXP-10-0001. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), recently acquired 1,526 acres of land to allow access for environmental monitoring and implementation of institutional controls. This property contains two homesteads - the former

331

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4-C 4-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-10-0008 Demolition of Building 12-2B Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusion B1.23, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B), applies to the proposed activity described below. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), proposes to demolish Building 12-2B and reduce the Pantex Plant footprint by 3,181 square feet. Project tasks include preparing and approving Planning Documents, removing building furnishings and contents, cutting, capping, and rerouting utilities associated with the structure, razing the structure, reworking/closing masonry wall at door opening, recycling uncontaminated concrete and metal, disposing of waste, and backfilling and restoring the area

332

Date Stamped/Typed Centered  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

D&D-10-003-C D&D-10-003-C NEPA Amendment No.: 11-002 Demolition of Buildings 11-10 and 11-30 Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusion B1.23, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart D, Appendix B), applies to the proposed activity described below. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), proposed to demolish Buildings 11-10 and 11-30 at the Pantex Plant, as described in NEPA Review Form (NRF) No. PXP-10-0007, which is hereby incorporated by reference. While removing the asphalt from the concrete slab at Building 11-30 during demolition, unknown concrete sumps, manholes, and drainage troughs were discovered. Removal of the sumps, manholes, and drainage troughs has been added to the scope of project no. D&D-10-003-

333

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10, 2010 10, 2010 CX-002349: Categorical Exclusion Determination Operations Systems Development and Integration CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 05/10/2010 Location(s): Amarillo, Texas Office(s): NNSA-Headquarters, Pantex Site Office May 10, 2010 CX-002372: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building 17 and 19 Utility Meter Install CX(s) Applied: B1.15, B2.2 Date: 05/10/2010 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 10, 2010 CX-007160: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pinnacle Peak Substation Coupling Capacitor Voltage Transformer Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 05/10/2010 Location(s): Maricopa County, Arizona Office(s): Western Area Power Administration-Desert Southwest Region May 10, 2010 CX-007155: Categorical Exclusion Determination

334

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-004275: Categorical Exclusion Determination Soil Amendment Product for Oilfield Brine Contaminated Soil ? Field Testing Part II CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 10/19/2010 Location(s): Yale, Oklahoma Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 18, 2010 CX-004292: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small Scale Electrical Power Generation from Low-Temperature Geothermal Process Water Utilized in a Mining Operation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 10/18/2010 Location(s): Reno, Nevada Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office October 18, 2010 CX-004290: Categorical Exclusion Determination Greenfield Community College - Geothermal Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 10/18/2010 Location(s): Massachusetts Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

335

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

15, 2012 15, 2012 CX-008946: Categorical Exclusion Determination Novel Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle Utilizing Pressurized Oxy-Combustion in Conjunction... CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/15/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory August 15, 2012 CX-008988: Categorical Exclusion Determination The Institute for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.16 Date: 08/15/2012 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): Golden Field Office August 15, 2012 CX-009115: Categorical Exclusion Determination Basin Modifications to Receive Research Fuel CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 08/15/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office August 14, 2012 CX-008895: Categorical Exclusion Determination California-City-Yorba Linda

336

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2011 0, 2011 CX-006072: Categorical Exclusion Determination Disconnection of Utilities CX(s) Applied: B1.27 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 20, 2011 CX-006071: Categorical Exclusion Determination Relocation and Operation of Machinery and Equipment CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 20, 2011 CX-006068: Categorical Exclusion Determination Site Characterization and Environmental Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/20/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 17, 2011 CX-006093: Categorical Exclusion Determination Missouri Independent Energy Efficiency Program: Onesteel Grinding Systems -

337

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2011 2, 2011 CX-007476: Categorical Exclusion Determination CEDF - Renewable Energy Program CX(s) Applied: B5.18 Date: 12/12/2011 Location(s): Vermont Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007654: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install Formed Core Sampler in Saltstone Disposal Facility Vault 2 CX(s) Applied: B6.3 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 9, 2011 CX-007487: Categorical Exclusion Determination City of Las Vegas Electric Vehicle Program CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 12/09/2011 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory December 9, 2011 CX-007486: Categorical Exclusion Determination Clean Energy Coalition - Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: B5.23

338

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 3, 2013 June 3, 2013 CX-010527: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renovations and Maintenance Activities for Buildings, Structures CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Ames Site Office June 3, 2013 CX-010526: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Ames Site Office June 3, 2013 CX-010512: Categorical Exclusion Determination Blackfeet Energy Efficiency Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06/03/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Golden Field Office June 3, 2013 CX-010507: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development and Demonstration of Smart Grid Inverters for High-Penetration Photovoltaic Applications

339

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2009 9, 2009 CX-000177: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohio County Franklin CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 11/09/2009 Location(s): Franklin County, Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office November 9, 2009 CX-000280: Categorical Exclusion Determination Smoking Shelters CX(s) Applied: B1.5 Date: 11/09/2009 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Idaho Operations Office, Nuclear Energy November 9, 2009 CX-000047: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tempe's Consultants and Studies, Revolving Loan Program, Lighting/Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning/Streetlight Retrofits, Audits, and Solar Photovoltaic CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B1.32, B2.5, A9, A11 Date: 11/09/2009 Location(s): Tempe, Arizona Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

340

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2011 6, 2011 CX-006520: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Energy Density Distributed Hydrostatic Direct Drive for Large Wind Turbine and Marine Hydro-Kinetic Device Applications CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/16/2011 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 16, 2011 CX-006513: Categorical Exclusion Determination Novel Low Cost, High Reliability Wind Turbine Drivetrain CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/16/2011 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office August 16, 2011 CX-006875: Categorical Exclusion Determination Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies Integration Laboratories: PH3 Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/16/2011 Location(s): Albuquerque, New Mexico

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

488: Categorical Exclusion Determination 488: Categorical Exclusion Determination Public Commuter Bike Station (and Cycling Initiative) CX(s) Applied: A11, B5.1 Date: 04/07/2010 Location(s): Saint Louis, Missouri Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 7, 2010 CX-002551: Categorical Exclusion Determination Replace Defense Waste Processing Facility Argon Tank CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/07/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office April 7, 2010 CX-001492: Categorical Exclusion Determination City of Saint Louis Missouri Statement of Work and All Activities Excluding Bike Station Project CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/07/2010 Location(s): St. Louis, Missouri Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

342

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22: Categorical Exclusion Determination 22: Categorical Exclusion Determination Mulberry Grove Geo-Thermal Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04/28/2010 Location(s): Mulberry Grove, Illinois Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office April 28, 2010 CX-002547: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bubbler Upgrade Support - Defense Waste Processing Facility Water Separation from Decon Frit Solution CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/28/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office April 28, 2010 CX-002175: Categorical Exclusion Determination U tu Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe Energy and Conservation Strategy and Implementation Plan CX(s) Applied: B2.5, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 04/28/2010 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

343

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2012 6, 2012 CX-009331: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Resolution 3D Laser Imaging for Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Operations Phase II CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/26/2012 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 26, 2012 CX-009433: Categorical Exclusion Determination Center for Biomass Utilization Renewal of Grant CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/26/2012 Location(s): North Dakota, Minnesota Offices(s): Golden Field Office September 25, 2012 CX-009242: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Light Water Reactor Fuels with Enhanced Accident Tolerance - AREVA Federal Services LLC CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B3.15 Date: 09/25/2012 Location(s): Florida, Wisconsin Offices(s): Nuclear Energy September 25, 2012 CX-009241: Categorical Exclusion Determination

344

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

May 30, 2013 May 30, 2013 CX-010215: Categorical Exclusion Determination Laufer Wind Group National Wind Technology Center Structure Lighting Tests CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.15 Date: 05/30/2013 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Golden Field Office May 30, 2013 CX-010483: Categorical Exclusion Determination Man Hole Cover Assembly Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/30/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office May 29, 2013 CX-010508: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cloud County Community College Wind Turbine CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.14 Date: 05/29/2013 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): Golden Field Office May 29, 2013 CX-010480: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of a Multi-User Network Testbed for Wide-Area Monitoring and

345

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2010 5, 2010 CX-002268: Categorical Exclusion Determination From Sensing to Enhancing the Brain Processes CX(s) Applied: B3.12 Date: 02/25/2010 Location(s): Albuquerque, New Mexico Office(s): NNSA-Headquarters, Sandia Site Office February 24, 2010 CX-006661: Categorical Exclusion Determination Repair Flowline at 83-AX-4 CX(s) Applied: B5.2, B5.4 Date: 02/24/2010 Location(s): Casper, Wyoming Office(s): RMOTC February 24, 2010 CX-001126: Categorical Exclusion Determination 183-2C Removal of Switchgear Cubicle CX(s) Applied: B4.10 Date: 02/24/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office February 24, 2010 CX-000907: Categorical Exclusion Determination Improved Design Tools for Surface Water and Standing Column Well Heat Pump

346

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22, 2012 22, 2012 CX-008535: Categorical Exclusion Determination King County Biogas and Nutrient Reduction CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 05/22/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office May 22, 2012 CX-008533: Categorical Exclusion Determination 45-Mile Hydroelectric Power Project Demonstration of New Methodologies to Reduce the LCOE for Small Hydropower Development (Formerly 51 Mile Project) CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 05/22/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Golden Field Office May 21, 2012 CX-008732: Categorical Exclusion Determination Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Administration Building (IAB) Communication Room Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 05/21/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

347

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7, 2010 7, 2010 CX-003666: Categorical Exclusion Determination D-Area Chemical Truck Unloading Station CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 07/27/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 27, 2010 CX-003247: Categorical Exclusion Determination Alaska-Tribe-Hoonah Indian Association CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 Date: 07/27/2010 Location(s): Alaska Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy July 27, 2010 CX-003503: Categorical Exclusion Determination Water and Energy Emergency End Use Demand Management Measures CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 07/27/2010 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office July 26, 2010 CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Washington-City-Everett

348

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

25, 2010 25, 2010 CX-004445: Categorical Exclusion Determination Waste Treatment Plant Secondary Waste Radioactive Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming (Module A) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/25/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office October 25, 2010 CX-004349: Categorical Exclusion Determination Near Zero Carbon Footprint Energy Creation through Thermal Oxidation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 10/25/2010 Location(s): Allentown, Pennsylvania Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office October 25, 2010 CX-004332: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Incentive Program - Old Lyme High School Geothermal CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 10/25/2010 Location(s): Old Lyme, Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

349

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2011 2, 2011 CX-005444: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant: Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Incremental Cost Recovery CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/22/2011 Location(s): Fairfax County, Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office March 22, 2011 CX-005547: Categorical Exclusion Determination Specific Manufacturing Capability (SMC) Incinerator and Propane Tank System Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 03/22/2011 Location(s): Idaho Office(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office March 22, 2011 CX-005440: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rhode Island Non-utility Scale Renewable Energy Program CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03/22/2011 Location(s): North Kingstown, Rhode Island Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy

350

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2010 1, 2010 CX-002350: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ohio Advanced Transportation Partnership (OATP) CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 05/11/2010 Location(s): Ohio Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory May 11, 2010 CX-002663: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar-Assisted Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/11/2010 Location(s): Oak Ridge, Tennessee Office(s): Oak Ridge Office, Science May 11, 2010 CX-002662: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation and Operation of Majorana Underground Electro-forming Research Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/11/2010 Location(s): Lead, South Dakota Office(s): Oak Ridge Office, Science May 11, 2010 CX-002347: Categorical Exclusion Determination Activity 6.2.5 ? Outreach and Education for Hydrogen Production and

351

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2013 1, 2013 CX-010325: Categorical Exclusion Determination Thermogravimetric/Differential Scanning Calorimetric Measurements of Solid Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/11/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office April 10, 2013 CX-010196: Categorical Exclusion Determination B903 Renovation CX(s) Applied: B1.16, B1.29, B2.1, B2.5 Date: 04/10/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory April 10, 2013 CX-010093: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kesselring Site K&L Load Center Relocation Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 04/10/2013 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program April 10, 2013 CX-010328: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dissolution of Sludge Constituents in Glycolate-containing 2H Evaporator

352

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4, 2009 4, 2009 CX-000822: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ion Chromatographic Analysis of Environmental Samples CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/24/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office November 24, 2009 CX-000099: Categorical Exclusion Determination Forest County Potawatomi Community Energy Efficiency Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1, A9 Date: 11/24/2009 Location(s): Wisconsin Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy November 24, 2009 CX-000098: Categorical Exclusion Determination Churchill County's Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Retrofit CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/24/2009 Location(s): Churchill County, Nevada Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy November 24, 2009 CX-000575: Categorical Exclusion Determination

353

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3, 2011 3, 2011 CX-005306: Categorical Exclusion Determination Revised Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy CX(s) Applied: B1.2, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Jupiter, Florida Office(s): Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 3, 2011 CX-005304: Categorical Exclusion Determination California-City-Simi Valley CX(s) Applied: A1, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 03/03/2011 Location(s): Simi Valley, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy March 2, 2011 CX-005488: Categorical Exclusion Determination Destructive Evaluation of Plutonium Storage Can Bundles CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/02/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office March 2, 2011

354

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 4, 2011 January 4, 2011 CX-004858: Categorical Exclusion Determination Facility Conservation Improvement Program Loan CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 01/04/2011 Location(s): Kansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office January 4, 2011 CX-004857: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building Operations Certification License CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 01/04/2011 Location(s): Kansas Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office January 4, 2011 CX-004854: Categorical Exclusion Determination Missouri-City-St. Peters CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 01/04/2011 Location(s): St. Peters, Missouri Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy January 3, 2011 CX-005094: Categorical Exclusion Determination

355

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

14, 2013 14, 2013 CX-010282: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low Temperature Nitrous Oxide Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): New Jersey Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 14, 2013 CX-010281: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low Temperature Nitrous Oxide Storage and Reduction Using Engineered Materials CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): Kentucky Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 13, 2013 CX-010397: Categorical Exclusion Determination Seismic Monitoring for Seismic Hazards Analyses CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 05/13/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office May 13, 2013 CX-010265: Categorical Exclusion Determination Validation Data for Light-Duty Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles

356

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2013 2, 2013 CX-010863: Categorical Exclusion Determination Thermal Diffusivity Evaluation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/02/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 1, 2013 CX-010679: Categorical Exclusion Determination Herbicide Application at Four Substations: Blythe, Knob, Parker, and Senator Wash Located in California during Fiscal Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): California, California, California Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Desert Southwest Region July 1, 2013 CX-010678: Categorical Exclusion Determination Herbicide Application at 40 Substations Located in Arizona During Fiscal Year 2014 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona

357

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

883: Categorical Exclusion Determination 883: Categorical Exclusion Determination Procure and Install Analytical Chemistry Instrumentation, 773-A (B&C Wings) CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/02/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 2, 2010 CX-002689: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fuels Research Lab at TA-35-455 CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/02/2010 Location(s): New Mexico Office(s): Los Alamos Site Office June 2, 2010 CX-002712: Categorical Exclusion Determination Maryland City-Bowie CX(s) Applied: B1.32, B2.5, B3.6, A1, A9, A11, B5.1 Date: 06/02/2010 Location(s): Bowie, Maryland Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy June 2, 2010 CX-002469: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - City

358

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2010 2, 2010 CX-000889: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dissolution of Uranium and Plutonium Containing Residues from F and H Area CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/12/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office February 12, 2010 CX-002614: Categorical Exclusion Determination Research and Education of Carbon Dioxide Separation from Coal Combustion Flue Gases with Regenerable Magnesium Solutions CX(s) Applied: B3.1, A9 Date: 02/12/2010 Location(s): Cincinnati, Ohio Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory February 12, 2010 CX-002272: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carlsbad Programs Group, Building National Parks Highway B, Shop CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/12/2010 Location(s): Carlsbad, New Mexico

359

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 14, 2011 November 14, 2011 CX-007807: Categorical Exclusion Determination Griffith Substation Transformer Addition CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 11/14/2011 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Desert Southwest Region November 10, 2011 CX-007667: Categorical Exclusion Determination Federal Bureau of Investigations Radiological Dispersion Device Training CX(s) Applied: B1.2 Date: 11/10/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office November 10, 2011 CX-007703: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sheetak Inc. - Thermoelectric Reactors for Efficient Automotive Thermal Storage CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/10/2011 Location(s): New York, Pennsylvania, Texas Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy November 10, 2011

360

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2012 9, 2012 CX-007821: Categorical Exclusion Determination Routine Activities at the Site A/Plot M, Illinois, Decommissioned Reactor Site CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B3.1 Date: 02/09/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Legacy Management February 9, 2012 CX-007846: Categorical Exclusion Determination Texas - City - Mesquite CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 02/09/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy February 9, 2012 CX-007961: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fabrication of Alloys With Trace Depleted Uranium in 1750 C Tube Furnace With Argon Cover in D-0142 CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/09/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office February 9, 2012 CX-007820: Categorical Exclusion Determination

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2009 6, 2009 CX-000540: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative Americium/Curium separations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office November 16, 2009 CX-006654: Categorical Exclusion Determination B-1-28 Test Site Reclamation CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.28, B6.1 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Casper, Wyoming Office(s): RMOTC November 16, 2009 CX-006660: Categorical Exclusion Determination Down Hole Seismic Source 68-SX-11 CX(s) Applied: B3.7, B5.12 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Casper, Wyoming Office(s): RMOTC November 16, 2009 CX-006664: Categorical Exclusion Determination Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center Process Improvement Old Pipe Yard Clean Up

362

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2011 9, 2011 CX-007082: Categorical Exclusion Determination Provide Telecommunications Cable to Buildings 6750 and 6753 CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 06/09/2011 Location(s): Albuquerque, New Mexico Office(s): NNSA-Headquarters, Sandia Site Office June 9, 2011 CX-007081: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of 7 New Storm Water Monitoring Stations CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 06/09/2011 Location(s): Albuquerque, New Mexico Office(s): NNSA-Headquarters, Sandia Site Office June 8, 2011 CX-006388: Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of Water Jet Cutter into 210-S Machine Shop CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/08/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office June 8, 2011 CX-006389: Categorical Exclusion Determination

363

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11, 2012 11, 2012 CX-009078: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dismantle and removal (D&R) of Domestic Water (DW) & Process Water (PWS) heater tanks CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/11/2012 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office July 10, 2012 CX-008811: Categorical Exclusion Determination Utility Energy Service Contract Closed Loop Centrifugal Chiller at the Central Chilled Water Facility CX(s) Applied: B1.5, B2.1 Date: 07/10/2012 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Brookhaven Site Office July 10, 2012 CX-008523: Categorical Exclusion Determination Non-Hazardous Solid Waste Disposal Contract (Garbage Collection) CX(s) Applied: A1, A8, B1.3 Date: 07/10/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory July 10, 2012

364

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2, 2011 2, 2011 CX-006532: Categorical Exclusion Determination Evaluating and Commercializing a Solvent-Based Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Lockhart, Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 22, 2011 CX-006543: Categorical Exclusion Determination Building 40 New Video Surveillance CX(s) Applied: A11, B1.15, B2.3 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Morgantown, West Virginia Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory August 22, 2011 CX-007076: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install New Power Poles in A & B Areas CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/22/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office August 22, 2011

365

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2011 1, 2011 CX-006069: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006067: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indoor Bench-Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011 CX-006066: Categorical Exclusion Determination Outdoor Tests, Experiments on Materials and Equipment Components CX(s) Applied: B3.11 Date: 06/21/2011 Location(s): Richland, Washington Office(s): Office of River Protection-Richland Office June 21, 2011

366

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2013 9, 2013 CX-009922: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fuel Cell Powered Airport Ground Support Equipment Deployment CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1, B5.22 Date: 01/29/2013 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 29, 2013 CX-009913: Categorical Exclusion Determination Program year 2012 State Energy Program Formula Grants CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 01/29/2013 Location(s): Indiana Offices(s): Golden Field Office January 29, 2013 CX-010016: Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Frontiers Research Center - Nanoscale Actinide Materials CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/29/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office January 29, 2013 CX-009853: Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Methods to Prohibit and Remediate Loss of Annular Isolation

367

Oil shale up-date  

SciTech Connect

The development of large domestic oil shale resources in an environmentally acceptable manner is technically feasible. Such development is approaching economic attractiveness. It is an essential step in attacking the major national problem: increasing oil imports. Several things have been impeding oil shale development. First, until recently there has been a lack of viable technology. Second, environmental regulations are becoming increasingly restrictive. These have become so unrealistic that the bare undeveloped ground in oil shale country fails to comply. Most of this area is now classified as a nonattainment area. The third reason is economic uncertainty. This relates to price and other governmental controls which make it impossible to predict future conditions with enough confidence to justify private investments. In an effort to overcome this uncertainty, while retaining the impeding controls, all types of governmental incentives and supports are being proposed by the Administration, the Congress, and the industry. This study highlights the current status of the more prominent technologies. It suggest that the next logical step in their advancement is the construction and operation of single full-size retorts or modules.

Pforzheimer, H.

1978-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

Topical report: Natural convection shutdown heat removal test facility (NSTF) evaluation for generating additional reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) data.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

As part of the Department of Energy (DOE) Generation IV roadmapping activity, the Very High Temperature gas cooled Reactor (VHTR) has been selected as the principal concept for hydrogen production and other process-heat applications such as district heating and potable water production. On this basis, the DOE has selected the VHTR for additional R&D with the ultimate goal of demonstrating emission-free electricity and hydrogen production with this advanced reactor concept. One of the key passive safety features of the VHTR is the potential for decay heat removal by natural circulation of air in a Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS). The air-cooled RCCS concept is notably similar to the Reactor Vessel Auxiliary Cooling System (RVACS) that was developed for the General Electric PRISM sodium-cooled fast reactor. As part of the DOE R&D program that supported the development of this fast reactor concept, the Natural Convection Shutdown Heat Removal Test Facility (NSTF) was developed at ANL to provide proof-of-concept data for the RVACS under prototypic natural convection flow, temperature, and heat flux conditions. Due to the similarity between RVACS and the RCCS, current VHTR R&D plans call for the utilization of the NSTF to provide RCCS model development and validation data, in addition to supporting design validation and optimization activities. Both air-cooled and water-cooled RCCS designs are to be included. In support of this effort, ANL has been tasked with the development of an engineering plan for mechanical and instrumentation modifications to NSTF to ensure that sufficiently detailed temperature, heat flux, velocity and turbulence profiles are obtained to adequately qualify the codes under the expected range of air-cooled RCCS flow conditions. Next year, similar work will be carried out for the alternative option of a water-cooled RCCS design. Analysis activities carried out in support of this experiment planning task have shown that: (a) in the RCCS, strong 3-D effects result in large heat flux, temperature, and heat transfer variations around the tube wall; (b) there is a large difference in the heat transfer coefficient predicted by turbulence models and heat transfer correlations, and this underscores the need of experimental work to validate the thermal performance of the RCCS; and (c) tests at the NSTF would embody all important fluid flow and heat transfer phenomena in the RCCS, in addition to covering the entire parameter ranges that characterize these phenomena. Additional supporting scaling study results are available in Reference 2. The purpose of this work is to develop a high-level engineering plan for mechanical and instrumentation modifications to NSTF in order to meet the following two technical objectives: (1) provide CFD and system-level code development and validation data for the RCCS under prototypic (full-scale) natural convection flow conditions, and (2) support RCCS design validation and optimization. As background for this work, the report begins by providing a summary of the original NSTF design and operational capabilities. Since the facility has not been actively utilized since the early 1990's, the next step is to assess the current facility status. With this background material in place, the data needs and requirements for the facility are then defined on the basis of supporting analysis activities. With the requirements for the facility established, appropriate mechanical and instrumentation modifications to NSTF are then developed in order to meet the overall project objectives. A cost and schedule for modifying the facility to satisfy the RCCS data needs is then provided.

Farmer, M. T.; Kilsdonk, D. J.; Tzanos, C.P.; Lomperski, S.; Aeschlimann, R.W.; Pointer, D.; Nuclear Engineering Division

2005-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2010 CX-001501: Categorical Exclusion Determination Commercial Renewable Energy Systems - FLS Meadowood Garden Solar CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 04012010 Location(s):...

370

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Non-Contaminating Cryogenic Fracturing Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12202011 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s):...

371

High Precision Radiometric Dating of Sedimentary Materials  

SciTech Connect

To develop field, petrographic and geochemical criteria to allow high precision U-Pb dating of sedimentary minerals within rapidly deposited sequences of carbonate and clastic rocks.

Hanson, G. N.

2006-09-19T23:59:59.000Z

372

Date: ____________ MATERIAL FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Feb 2003 Date: ____________ MATERIAL FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL 1) Source: Bldg: ________________________________________ Disinfection? cc YES, Autoclaved (each container tagged with `Treated Biomedical Waste') cc YES, Chemical

Sinnamon, Gordon J.

373

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 28, 2011 CX-006930: Categorical Exclusion Determination Next Generation Inverter Design CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09282011 Location(s): Torrance, Los Angeles...

374

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2011 9, 2011 CX-006384: Categorical Exclusion Determination Construction and Operation of a Cask Processing Enclosure at the Transuranic Waste Processing Center on the Oak Ridge Reservation, Lenoir City, Tennessee CX(s) Applied: B1.13, B3.1, B6.6 Date: 04/19/2011 Location(s): Lenoir City, Tennessee Office(s): Environmental Management, Oak Ridge Office April 19, 2011 CX-005769: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dismantle and Removal (D&R) and Enhance Chemical Cleaning (ECC) on Waste Tank 8F (General) CX(s) Applied: B1.28 Date: 04/19/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office April 18, 2011 CX-005630: Categorical Exclusion Determination South Carolina Clean Green Investment Incentives ? Solar Initiatives

375

Using neighbors to date web documents  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Time has been successfully used as a feature in web information retrieval tasks. In this context, estimating a document's inception date or last update date is a necessary task. Classic approaches have used HTTP header fields to estimate a document's ... Keywords: link analysis, web dynamics, web information retrieval

Sérgio Nunes; Cristina Ribeiro; Gabriel David

2007-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

Property:Event/Date | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Property Property Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Property:Event/Date Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Event/Date Property Type Date Description The date on which an event occurs. Pages using the property "Event/Date" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 1 11th Annual Workshop on Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading + 3 October 2011 + 11th Annual Workshop on Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Day 2 + 4 October 2011 + 15th International Business Forum: Low Carbon High Growth - Business Models for a Changing Climate + 21 October 2012 + 18th Africa Partnership Forum + 25 April 2012 + 2 2012 Bonn Climate Change Conference + 14 May 2012 + 7 7th Asia Clean Energy Forum + 4 June 2012 + A ASEAN Roadmapping Workshop + 2 June 2011 +

377

Power transient analyses of experimental in-reflector devices during safety shutdown in Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) is designed to be a 100 MW material testing reactor (MTR) and it is expected to become the reference facility in the framework of European nuclear research activity. As the core neutron spectrum is quite fast, several experimental devices concerning fuel studies have been conceived to be placed in the reflector in order to exploit a proper thermal neutron flux irradiation. Since the core power is relatively high, the neutronic coupling between the reactor core and the reflector devices has to be taken into account for different rod insertions. In fact the thermal power produced within the fuel samples is considerable. Heat removal during shutdown is a main topic in nuclear safety and it is worth to analyse thermal power transients in fuel samples as well. Here a thermal hydraulic model for JHR core is proposed aiming at a simple and representative description as far as reactivity feedbacks are concerned. Then it is coupled with a neutronic pointwise kinetics analysis by means of the DULCINEE code to compute core power transient calculations. Moreover, some reflector-core coupling evaluations are performed through Monte Carlo method using the TRIPOLI 4.7 code. The JHR equilibrium cycle is considered with respect to four fuel compositions namely Beginning of Cycle (BOC), Xenon Saturation Point (XSP), Middle of Cycle (MOC) and End of Cycle (EOC). Then thermal power transients in the experimental reflector devices are evaluated during safety shutdowns and they are verified for all these cycle steps. (authors)

Camprini, P. C.; Sumini, M. [Univ. of Bologna (Italy); Artioli, C. [National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development ENEA (Italy); Gonnier, C.; Pouchin, B.; Bourdon, S. [Atomic Energy Commission CEA (France)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

Intitule Date Enseignant Intitule Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna 59 0 4 -0 2 AD  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 Page 1 Intitule Date Enseignant Intitule Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna 59 0 4 - 0 2 AD EL QOTBI Tuna EL QOTBI Noemie FATMI Karine CLAIR Florian KNISCH Guillaume NAHON Charlotte SEHMOUNE Nabil AD : A

Douai, Antoine

379

Detection and Analysis of Threatsto the Energy Sector (DATES), March 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, , March 2010 Detection and Analysis of Threatsto the Energy Sector (DATES), March 2010 A security monitoring capability featuring multiple detection algorithms and cross-domain event correlation for defense against cyber attacks on energy control systems. DATES is a detection and security information/event management (SIEM) solution enabling asset owners to protect their energy control systems at the network, host, and device level from cyber attacks. DATES complements traditional, signature-based detection with multiple detection algorithms, including modelbased and flow anomaly detection and cross-site attack correlation. The DATES detection and SIEM solution gives operators succinct and intuitive attack visualization, with attacks prioritized as to their

380

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory November 23, 2009 CX-000206: Categorical Exclusion Determination Michigan Biogas Center of Excellence CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 11232009 Location(s): Flint,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Recovery and Reinvestment Act State Energy Program - Estacada School District Biomass Boilers CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 08032010 Location(s): Estacada, Oregon Office(s): Energy...

382

Property:Date Submitted | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Date Submitted Date Submitted Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Date Submitted Property Type String Pages using the property "Date Submitted" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) M MHK Technologies/14 MW OTECPOWER + 45:22.0 + MHK Technologies/Aegir Dynamo + 47:39.7 + MHK Technologies/AirWEC + 3/2/2013 + MHK Technologies/Anaconda bulge tube drives turbine + 35:14.3 + MHK Technologies/AquaBuoy + 9/2/2010 + MHK Technologies/Aquanator + 9/28/2010 + MHK Technologies/Aquantis + 47:31.6 + MHK Technologies/Archimedes Wave Swing + 9/28/2010 + MHK Technologies/Atlantis AN 150 + 6/18/2012 + MHK Technologies/Atlantis AR 1000 + 6/18/2012 + MHK Technologies/Atlantis AS 400 + 6/18/2012 + MHK Technologies/Atlantisstrom + 51:25.6 + MHK Technologies/BOLT Lifesaver + 04:16.3 +

383

: H. Jack Elackwell, Area Manager, LAAO DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

O.&E b.&AORANDti l > : H. Jack Elackwell, Area Manager, LAAO DATE: June 5, 1973 70 : ?ZH-Division Leader ,WE,T : ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY SURVEY OF LOS ALAMOS COMIMUNITY...

384

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03172010 Location(s): Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory March 17, 2010 CX-001327: Categorical...

385

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0, 2012 CX-009271: Categorical Exclusion Determination National Governors Association Energy Project - Phase II CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09102012 Location(s): CX: none...

386

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 09242012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory September 24, 2012 CX-009336: Categorical Exclusion...

387

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for High Performance Hospitals CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 09302010 Location(s): San Francisco, California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National...

388

102nd Annual Meeting Dates to Remember  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Dates to Remember November 1, 2010 Online registration opens January 7, 2011 Exhibitor Presentations: Deadline for abstracts to be printed in the abstract book January 31, 2011 Last day for early booth rental fees January 31, 2011 Booths cance

389

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of Water Based, Critical Flow, Non-Vapor-Compression Cooling Cycle CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04302012 Location(s): Kansas...

390

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Energy Program- ARRA Revolving Loan Fund- Ivan Smith Furniture- Compressed Natural Gas Vehicle Fueling Stations CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B5.22 Date: 02112013 Location(s):...

391

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Solar - Roof Mounted - Ebay CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 02082011 Location(s): South Jordan, Utah Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office February...

392

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Laboratory April 11, 2011 CX-005602: Categorical Exclusion Determination Jet Drilling With Energized Fluids CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B3.7 Date: 04112011 Location(s):...

393

Property:PublicationDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

"PublicationDate" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 2 2.8-Ma Ash-Flow Caldera At Chegem River In The Northern Caucasus Mountains (Russia),...

394

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Categorical Exclusion Determination Low-Cost Integrated Substrate for Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) Lighting (Ewing) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03192010 Location(s):...

395

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1, 2012 CX-008228: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hydropower Energy Resource (HyPER) Harvester CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 04112012 Location(s): New Mexico Offices(s): Golden...

396

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Golden Field Office November 24, 2010 CX-004532: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tidal Energy System for On-Shore Power Generation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 11242010...

397

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New Reactor Technology for Hydro processing Bio-oils to Produce Gasoline, Diesel and Jet Fuel CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 05022011 Location(s): Maryland Office(s): Energy...

398

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2012 8, 2012 CX-008770: Categorical Exclusion Determination Buried Power Line at Customer Operations Center CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B4.6, B4.12 Date: 06/08/2012 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC June 8, 2012 CX-008816: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renovations and Maintenance Activities for Buildings, Structures, Infrastructures and Equipment CX(s) Applied: B1.3, 61.4, 61.5, B1.11, B1.15, B1.16, B1.17, 81.22, B1.27, 62.1, B2.2, B2.3, 62.5 Date: 06/08/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): New Brunswick Laboratory June 8, 2012 CX-008817: Categorical Exclusion Determination Indoor Bench Scale Research Projects and Conventional Laboratory Operations CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/08/2012 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): New Brunswick Laboratory June 8, 2012 CX-008544: Categorical Exclusion Determination

399

Computer Control of Boiler Operation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Rapidly rising energy costs present the opportunity for substantial cost savings through improved boiler combustion control. A process computer control system was installed at an Air Products & Chemicals facility in 1978. As a result the boiler efficiency has increased over 11%. The control system includes; air flow, fuel flow, pressure and drum level control. Air flow control is achieved through modulation of the F.D. fan inlet vanes. Demand for airflow is produced from a high signal selection of the steam pressure controller or the total fuel signal. The output of the oxygen controller is used to modify this airflow index by the desired air/fuel ratio. The air/fuel ratio is a polynomial function of the type of fuel used. In summary, the computer control system provides for; greater overall boiler stability, operation within tight air/gas limits, increased boiler efficiency, capability to burn multiple fuels, faster response to demand changes, and fewer shutdowns.

Pareja, G. E.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2010 5, 2010 CX-005092: Categorical Exclusion Determination Non-radiological Carbon Analysis Using Oceanography International Analytical 1030 Watt Instrument CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/15/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 15, 2010 CX-004885: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewal of Rates and Services for the Central Valley Project, the California-Oregon Transmission Project, the Pacific Alternating Current Intertie, and Path 15 Transmission - Rate Order Number Western Area Power Administration-156 CX(s) Applied: B4.3 Date: 12/15/2010 Location(s): California Office(s): Western Area Power Administration-Sierra Nevada Region December 15, 2010 CX-004693: Categorical Exclusion Determination Integrated Smart Distribution Research, Development and Demonstration

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2010 9, 2010 CX-004278: Categorical Exclusion Determination Characterization of the Triassic Newark Basin of New York and New Jersey for Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 10/19/2010 Location(s): Clarkstown, New York Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 19, 2010 CX-004275: Categorical Exclusion Determination Soil Amendment Product for Oilfield Brine Contaminated Soil ? Field Testing Part II CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 10/19/2010 Location(s): Yale, Oklahoma Office(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory October 18, 2010 CX-004292: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small Scale Electrical Power Generation from Low-Temperature Geothermal Process Water Utilized in a Mining Operation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.6

402

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9, 2012 9, 2012 CX-008380: Categorical Exclusion Determination Archer to Ault 230 Kilovolt Transmission Line Structure Replacement, Weld County, Colorado CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/09/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region May 9, 2012 CX-008791: Categorical Exclusion Determination Western Area Power Administration and Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. Fiber Optic Installation Project From Beaver Creek to Big Sandy Substations Morgan, Washington, and Lincoln Counties, Colorado CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 05/09/2012 Location(s): Washington, Colorado Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region May 9, 2012 CX-008759: Categorical Exclusion Determination Information Operations & Research Center (IORC) Room E-6 Air Conditioner

403

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5, 2010 5, 2010 CX-007165: Categorical Exclusion Determination Prescott-Pinnacle Peak Bird Diversion Equipment Addition CX(s) Applied: B1.20 Date: 12/15/2010 Location(s): Yavapai County, Arizona Office(s): Western Area Power Administration-Desert Southwest Region December 15, 2010 CX-005092: Categorical Exclusion Determination Non-radiological Carbon Analysis Using Oceanography International Analytical 1030 Watt Instrument CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/15/2010 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Savannah River Operations Office December 15, 2010 CX-004885: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewal of Rates and Services for the Central Valley Project, the California-Oregon Transmission Project, the Pacific Alternating Current Intertie, and Path 15 Transmission - Rate Order Number Western Area Power

404

Loss of line shutdown for line-commutated utility-interactive inverter  

SciTech Connect

The line-commutated, single-phase, utility-interactive inverter has been used in utility-connected photovoltaic (PV) and wind energy systems because it is commercially available at an attractive price. If unity power factor operation is required, a shunt capacitor can be used. This causes a problem if the utility line is disconnected; the inverter can continue to run and can thus be a hazard. This can be solved by using a fast-acting overvoltage detection circuit which operates directly on the inverter control electronics.

Landsman, E.E.

1981-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Willard Libby, Radiocarbon, and Carbon Dating  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Willard Libby, Radiocarbon, and Carbon Dating Willard Libby, Radiocarbon, and Carbon Dating Resources with Additional Information · Radiocarbon Dating Willard Libby Courtesy UCLA Photography 'Scientific discoveries of various magnitudes are constantly occurring in myriad fields of study. It is a rarity, however, to make a breakthrough that not only has an impact on an individual field but also revolutionizes scientific thought across multiple disciplines. Willard Frank Libby accomplished this feat. Libby first proposed his idea of carbon dating in 1947 and over the next 12 years he researched and perfected the process. Libby discovered that when plants absorb carbon for photosynthesis they also absorb certain amounts of carbon-14. He deduced that when the plant dies, it no longer absorbs any of this carbon and that carbon-14 decays at a predictable rate. Libby found a way to determine the age of plant-based artifacts utilizing the decay rate of carbon-14. This process has been used to determine the age of mummies, prehistoric artifacts and dwellings. This dating technique has proven extremely valuable to earth scientists, archeologists, and anthropologists. '1

406

A solid oxide fuel cell power system: 1992--1993 field operation  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Westinghouse has deployed fully integrated, automatically controlled, packaged solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) power generation systems in order to obtain useful customer feedback. Recently, Westinghouse has deployed 20 kW class natural gas fueled SOFC generator modules integrated into two 25 kW SOFC systems, the first with The UTILITIES, a Japanese consortium. The UTILITIES 25 kW SOFC system is the focus of this paper. The unit was shipped to the Rokko Island Test Center for Advanced Energy Systems (near Kobe, Japan) operated by Kansai Electric Power Co.; testing was initiated February 1992. Module A operated for 2601 hours at an ave output 16.6 kW dc; final shutdown was induced by current stability problems with dissipator (restart not possible because of damaged cells). Module B operated for 1579 hours at ave output 17.8 kWdc. The unit was damaged by operation at excessively high fuel utilization > 91%. It was rebuilt and returned to Rokko Island. This module B2 operated for 1843 hours on PNG; shutdown was cuased by air supply failure. After a new blower and motor were installed July 1993, the system was restarted August 5, 1993 and operated continuously until November 10, 1993, when an automatic shutdown was induced as part of a MITI licensing inspection. After restart, the unit passed 6000 hours of operation on desulfurized PNG on January 25, 1994. Westinghouse`s future plans are outlined.

Veyo, S.E. [Westinghouse Electric Corp., Pittsburgh, PA (United States). Science and Technology Center; Kusunoki, A.; Takeuchi, S. [Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc., Osaka (Japan); Kaneko, S. [Tokyo Gas Co. Ltd. (Japan); Yokoyama, H. [Osaka Gas Co. Ltd. (Japan)

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Presentations by Date | Merit Review Application  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Presentations by Date Presentations by Date Friday May 17 2013 Title Presenting Organization Document Presentation date A MultiAir / MultiFuel Approach to Enhancing Engine System Efficiency Chrysler ace062_reese_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 Lean Gasoline System Development for Fuel Efficient Small Car General Motors ace063_smith_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 Gasoline Ultra Fuel Efficient Vehicle Delphi ace064_confer_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 Advanced Gasoline Turbocharged Direct Injection (GTDI) Engine Development Ford Motor Company ace065_weaver_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 Advanced Combustion Concepts - Enabling Systems and Solutions (ACCESS) for High Efficiency Light Duty Vehicles Robert Bosch ace066_yilmaz_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013 ATP-LD; Cummins Next Generation Tier 2 Bin 2 Diesel Engine Cummins ace061_ruth_2013_o.pdf 05/17/2013

408

Facility Owner Contractor Award Date End Date Options/Award Term  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OptionsAward Term Ultimate Potential Expiration Date Contract FY Competed Parent Companies LLC Partners DOE Site Procurement Director DOE Contracting Officer SLAC National...

409

Re-release Date: August 13, 2013  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Re-release Date: August 13, 2013" Re-release Date: August 13, 2013" "Table 27. Estimated rail transportation rates for coal, state to state, EIA data" ,,"Nominal Dollars per Ton",,,,"Annual Percent Change" "Origin State","Destination State",2008,2009,2010,," 2008-2010"," 2009-2010" "Alabama","Alabama"," $14.43"," $13.59"," $15.46",, 3.5, 13.8 "Alabama","Georgia"," $19.13"," $19.58"," $22.30",, 8.0, 13.9 "Alabama","Kentucky"," -"," W"," -",," -"," -" "Alabama","New Jersey"," W"," -"," -",," -"," -"

410

Computational Age Dating of Special Nuclear Materials  

SciTech Connect

This slide-show presented an overview of the Constrained Progressive Reversal (CPR) method for computing decays, age dating, and spoof detecting. The CPR method is: Capable of temporal profiling a SNM sample; Precise (compared with known decay code, such a ORIGEN); Easy (for computer implementation and analysis). ? We have illustrated with real SNM data using CPR for age dating and spoof detection. If SNM is pure, may use CPR to derive its age. If SNM is mixed, CPR will indicate that it is mixed or spoofed.

None

2012-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

411

Introductory Human Factors Engineering Training Course for Operating Nuclear Power Plant Personnel  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report provides training materials for a one-day course in human factors engineering (HFE). The course is intended for utility personnel involved in modernizing operating nuclear power plant (NPP) designs and is also useful for vendors and other stakeholders. The primary focus of the HFE training is the main control room and its human-system interfaces (HSIs). In addition, it addresses other operator work locations such as the remote shutdown station, local control stations, and emergency ...

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2009 6, 2009 CX-000308: Categorical Exclusion Determination Connecticut Revision 2 - Retrofit 9 State Buildings CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B1.3, B1.4, B1.5, B1.15, B1.23, B1.24, B1.31, B2.1, B2.2, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Connecticut Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory November 16, 2009 CX-000543: Categorical Exclusion Determination Repair Domestic Water Leak at 701-2L CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/16/2009 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management, Savannah River Operations Office November 16, 2009 CX-000542: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lithium Separation from Environmental Samples for Inductively Coupled Plasma Mars (ICP-MS) Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/16/2009

413

Program on Technology Innovation: Bat Detection and Shutdown System for Utility-Scale Wind Turbines  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Although development of renewable energy sources is generally believed to be a sound environmental decision, wind power development has been criticized for posing potential threats to bats. The objective of this project is to develop and deploy an ultrasonic microphone array on a wind turbine. The array will detect bats near the turbine upon which it is deployed and automatically curtail operations when bats are detected in or near the rotor-swept area. The first two objectives of this project were to se...

2010-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

414

Non-Unit Faculty Effective Date  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SUBJECT: Non-Unit Faculty Evaluation Effective Date: 05-18-11 Policy Number: 4-500.1 Supersedes: 4 Adoption: 03-30-05 APPLICABILITY/ACCOUNTABILITY: This policy is applicable to all units and departments that employ non-unit faculty employees in regular positions. POLICY STATEMENT: Non-unit faculty members

Glebov, Leon

415

SAVE THE DATE! UC Energy Week 2011  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SAVE THE DATE! UC Energy Week 2011 April 4 - 7, 2011 Hosted by the University of California, Davis Building on the success of the 2010 UC Energy Week, the California Renewable Energy Collaborative (CREC) is primed to host UC Energy Week 2011. The event consists of a global energy symposium, three forums

Islam, M. Saif

416

CURRICULUM VITAE Date: December 23, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Medical Center (Australia), 2006. Courtney Harrison, University of Kentucky, 2006. Alena Mozhaeva, Joint: Institution: National University of La Plata, Medical School, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina Degree: M.D. Date of Graduation: 1984 Institution: National University of La Plata Medical School, La Plata, Buenos

417

Microsoft Word - EIA-914 Instructions_Expiration Date 09202012.doc  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

205 205 Washington, DC 20585 Expiration Date: 09/20/2012 INSTRUCTIONS for FORM EIA-914 MONTHLY NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION REPORT PURPOSE The Energy Information Administration's (EIA) Form EIA-914 Monthly Natural Gas Production Report collects information on natural gas production by operators in the United States. Data are collected pursuant to the Federal Energy Administration (FEA) Act of 1974, Public Law 93-275. This report is mandatory under the FEA Act. The aggregated data will appear in EIA publications Natural Gas Annual, Monthly Energy Review, and Natural Gas Monthly, and on EIA's website http://www.eia.gov. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Report must be completed by selected operators of oil and gas wells in the United States that produce natural

418

Property:Geothermal/AwardDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

AwardDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name GeothermalAwardDate Property Type String Description Award Date Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleProperty...

419

JGI - Operations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Operations The Operations Department sees to it that JGI has the best possible facilities and support, ensuring that its operations are conducted in accordance with the...

420

Power Operations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Power Operations Outage Coordination Standards of Conduct Transmission Planning You are here: SN Home page > Power Operations Power Operations Western's Sierra Nevada Region...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Property:StartDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

StartDate" StartDate" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 1 April 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - August 2008 + 1 August 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - December 2008 + 1 December 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 + 1 February 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2009 + 1 February 2009 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2008 + 1 January 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2009 + 1 January 2009 +

422

Research Highlights Sorted by Submission Date  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Submission Date Submission Date January 2014 Forecast Calls for Better Models: Examining the Core Components of Arctic Clouds to Clear Their Influence on Climate ARM ASR Ovink, J. December 2013 Effect of Environmental Instability on the Sensitivity of Convection to the Rimed Ice Species ASR Van Weverberg, K. All Mixed Up-Probing Large and Small Scale Turbulence Structures in Continental Stratocumulus Clouds ARM ASR Fang, M., Albrecht, B. A. Ground Stations Likely Get a Boost from Satellites to Estimate Carbon Dioxide Emissions ARM Roeder, L. R. November 2013 Spectro-microscopic Measurements of Carbonaceous Aerosol Aging in Central California ARM ASR Gilles, M., Moffet, R. Digging Into Climate Models' Needs with SPADE ARM ASR Gustafson, W. I. Nailing Down Ice in a Cloud Model ARM ASR

423

Property:EndDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

using the property "EndDate" using the property "EndDate" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 1 May 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - August 2008 + 1 September 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - December 2008 + 1 January 2009 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 + 1 March 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2009 + 1 March 2009 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2008 + 1 February 2008 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2009 + 1 February 2009 +

424

Carbon-14 Bomb-Pulse Dating  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons during the 1950s and early 1960s doubled the concentration of carbon-14 atmosphere and created a pulse that labeled everything alive in the past 50 years as carbon moved up the food chain. The variation in carbon-14 concentration in time is well-documented and can be used to chronologically date all biological materials since the mid-1950s.

Buchholz, B A

2007-12-16T23:59:59.000Z

425

Low energy cyclotron for radiocarbon dating  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The measurement of naturally occurring radioisotopes whose half lives are less than a few hundred million years but more than a few years provides information about the temporal behavior of geologic and climatic processes, the temporal history of meteoritic bodies as well as the production mechanisms of these radioisotopes. A new extremely sensitive technique for measuring these radioisotopes at tandem Van de Graaff and cyclotron facilities has been very successful though the high cost and limited availability have been discouraging. We have built and tested a low energy cyclotron for radiocarbon dating similar in size to a conventional mass spectrometer. These tests clearly show that with the addition of a conventional ion source, the low energy cyclotron can perform the extremely high sensitivity /sup 14/C measurements that are now done at accelerator facilities. We found that no significant background is present when the cyclotron is tuned to accelerate /sup 14/C negative ions and the transmission efficiency is adequate to perform radiocarbon dating on milligram samples of carbon. The internal ion source used did not produce sufficient current to detect /sup 14/C directly at modern concentrations. We show how a conventional carbon negative ion source, located outside the cyclotron magnet, would produce sufficient beam and provide for quick sampling to make radiocarbon dating milligram samples with a modest laboratory instrument feasible.

Welch, J.J.

1984-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Property:FERC License Issuance Date | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Issuance Date Jump to: navigation, search Property Name FERC License Issuance Date Property Type String Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleProperty:FERCLicense...

427

Property:FERC License Application Date | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Property Name FERC License Application Date Property Type String Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleProperty:FERCLicenseApplicationDate&oldid610687...

428

EV Project Overview Report - Project to Date through March 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to date through March 2012 Charging Infrastructure Region Number of EV Project Charging Units Installed To Date Number of Charging Events Performed Electricity Consumed (AC MWh)...

429

Fast Plasma Shutdowns Obtained With Massive Hydrogenic, Noble and Mixed-Gas Injection in DIII-D  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Massive gas injection (MGI) experiments with H{sub 2}, D{sub 2}, He, Ne and Ar and 'mixed' (H{sub 2} + Ar and D{sub 2} + Ne) gases injected into 'ITER-similar' 1.3-MA H-mode plasmas are described. Gas species, injected quantity Q, delivery time, t{sub inj}, rate-of-rise and intrinsic and added impurities are found to affect the attributes and 'disruption mitigation' efficacies of the resulting fast plasma shutdowns. With sufficient Q and t{sub inj} thermal energy and fast but benign current decays with reduced vacuum vessel vertical force impulse. With pure and mixed low-Z gases, free-electron densities up to 2 x 10{sup 21} m{sup -3} are obtained. While these densities are high relative to normal tokamak densities, they are still an order of magnitude smaller than the densities required for unconditional mitigation of the runaway electron avalanche process. Key information relevant to the design of effective MGI systems for larger tokamaks and ITER has been obtained and the collective species and Q-variation data provides a rich basis for validation of emerging 2D + t MHD/transport/radiation models.

Wesley, J; Hollmann, E; Jernigan, T; Van Zeeland, M; Baylor, L; Boedo, J; Combs, S; Evans, T; Groth, M; Humphreys, D; Hyatt, A; Izzo, V; James, A; Moyer, R; Parks, P; Rudakov, D; Strait, E; Wu, W; Yu, J

2008-10-14T23:59:59.000Z

430

Fast Plasma Shutdowns Obtained With Massive Hydrogenic, Noble and Mixed-Gas Injection in DIII-D  

SciTech Connect

Massive gas injection (MGI) experiments with H{sub 2}, D{sub 2}, He, Ne and Ar and 'mixed' (H{sub 2} + Ar and D{sub 2} + Ne) gases injected into 'ITER-similar' 1.3-MA H-mode plasmas are described. Gas species, injected quantity Q, delivery time, t{sub inj}, rate-of-rise and intrinsic and added impurities are found to affect the attributes and 'disruption mitigation' efficacies of the resulting fast plasma shutdowns. With sufficient Q and t{sub inj} < {approx}2 ms, all species provide fast (within {le} {approx}3 ms), more-or-less uniform radiative dissipation of the 0.7-MJ plasma thermal energy and fast but benign current decays with reduced vacuum vessel vertical force impulse. With pure and mixed low-Z gases, free-electron densities up to 2 x 10{sup 21} m{sup -3} are obtained. While these densities are high relative to normal tokamak densities, they are still an order of magnitude smaller than the densities required for unconditional mitigation of the runaway electron avalanche process. Key information relevant to the design of effective MGI systems for larger tokamaks and ITER has been obtained and the collective species and Q-variation data provides a rich basis for validation of emerging 2D + t MHD/transport/radiation models.

Wesley, J; Hollmann, E; Jernigan, T; Van Zeeland, M; Baylor, L; Boedo, J; Combs, S; Evans, T; Groth, M; Humphreys, D; Hyatt, A; Izzo, V; James, A; Moyer, R; Parks, P; Rudakov, D; Strait, E; Wu, W; Yu, J

2008-10-14T23:59:59.000Z

431

Effective Date: xx/xx/xx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

With the exception of ongoing processes or operations (for example, analytical instrumentation), regulators shall be removed from cylinders at the end of each work shift. Only...

432

Date | 1Refrigeration and Air Conditioning EMA Education and Training Date | 2Refrigeration and Air Conditioning EMA Education and Training  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Date | 1Refrigeration and Air Conditioning EMA Education and Training #12;Date | 2Refrigeration Flow Coil Design etc. Finger Print Relationship Every evaporator is unique Unstable Region * = examples

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

433

HSPD-12 Implementation Status Report Updated Date:  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Implementation Status Report Implementation Status Report Updated Date: Number of Employees requiring PIV credentials* Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check* Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process* Number of Employees with completed/adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation)* Total Number of PIV credentials Issued to Employees* Number of Contractors requiring PIV credentials Number of Contractors requiring NACIs (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check Number of Contractors requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process Number of Contractors with

434

DETERMINATION OF THE QUANTITY OF I-135 RELEASED FROM THE AGR-1 TEST FUELS AT THE END OF ATR OPERATING CYCLE 138B  

SciTech Connect

The AGR-1 experiment is a multiple fueled-capsule irradiation experiment being conducted in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) in support of the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The experiment began irradiation in the ATR with a cycle that reached full power on December 26, 2006 and ended with shutdown of the reactor for a brief outage on February 10, 2007 at 0900. The AGR-1 experiment will continue cyclical irradiation for about 2.5 years. In order to allow estimation of the amount of radioiodine released during the first cycle, purge gas flow to all capsules continued for about 4 days after reactor shutdown. The FPMS data acquired during part of that shutdown flow period has been analyzed to elucidate the level of 135I released during the operating cycle.

J. K. Hartwell; D. M. Scates; J. B. Walter; M. W. Drigert

2007-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Analysis of the Hydrologic Response Associated with Shutdown and Restart of the 200-ZP-1 Pump-and-Treat System  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A number of programs have been implemented on the Hanford Site that utilize the pumping and treatment of contaminated groundwater as part of their remediation strategy. Often the treated water is reinjected into the aquifer at injection well sites. The implementation of remedial pump and treat systems, however, results in hydraulic pressure responses, both areally and vertically (i.e., with depth) within the pumped aquifer. The area within the aquifer affected by the pump and treat system (i.e., radius of influence) is commonly estimated based on detecting associated water-level responses within surrounding monitor wells. Natural external stresses, such as barometric pressure fluctuations, however, can have a discernible impact on well water-level measurements. These temporal barometric effects may significantly mask water-level responses within more distant wells that are only slightly affected (< 0.10 m) by the test system. External stress effects, therefore, can lead to erroneous indications of the radius of influence of the imposed pump and treat system remediation activities and can greatly diminish the ability to analyze the associated well responses for hydraulic property characterization. When these extraneous influences are significant, adjustments or removal of the barometric effects from the test-response record may be required for quantitative hydrologic assessment. This report examines possible hydrologic effects of pump and treat remediation actions and provides a detailed analysis of water-level measurements for selected 200-ZP-1 pump and treat system monitor wells during the recent Y2K shutdown (December 1999) and restart activity (January 2000). The general findings presented in this report have universal application for unconfined and confined aquifer systems.

Spane, Frank A.; Thorne, Paul D.

2000-09-08T23:59:59.000Z

436

Operating plan FY 1998  

SciTech Connect

This document is the first edition of Argonne`s new Operating Plan. The Operating Plan complements the strategic planning in the Laboratory`s Institutional Plan by focusing on activities that are being pursued in the immediate fiscal year, FY 1998. It reflects planning that has been done to date, and it will serve in the future as a resource and a benchmark for understanding the Laboratory`s performance. The heart of the Institutional Plan is the set of major research initiatives that the Laboratory is proposing to implement in future years. In contrast, this Operating Plan focuses on Argonne`s ongoing R&D programs, along with cost-saving measures and other improvements being implemented in Laboratory support operations.

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Thme Date Enseignant Thme Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna Suites 16-mai AD Equa diff 24-mai RL  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 Page 1 Thème Date Enseignant Thème Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna Suites 16-mai AD Equa diff 24 Probas 23-mai MAC Thème Date Enseignant Thème Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna Configurations 31-mai DT Arithm

Douai, Antoine

438

Record of Decision, Shutdown of the River Water System at the Savannah River Site, Savannah River Operations Office, Aiken, South Carolina  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 1998 / Notices have to be addressed during dismantlement. The no action alternative would involve keeping the defueled S3G and D1G Prototype reactor plants in protective storage indefinitely. Since there is some residual radioactivity with long half-lives, such as nickel-59, in the defueled reactor plant, this alternative would leave some radioactivity at the Kesselring Site indefinitely. The Naval Reactors Program distributed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the Disposal of the S3G and D1G Prototype Reactor Plants in July 1997. Comments from 14 individuals and agencies were received in either oral or written statements at a public hearing or in comment letters. Approximately one-third of the commenters expressed a preference for

439

DOE-EA-1184 Date Prepared:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

184 184 Date Prepared: Prepared by: Environmental Assessment for the Trunsfer of the DPRodd T~uct to the County of Los AIumos Los Alamos, New Mexico Final Document January 23,1997 US Department of Energy Los Alamos Area Office DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or use- fulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any spe- cific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufac-

440

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department's Management of Cloud Department's Management of Cloud Computing Services OAS-RA-L-11-06 April 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: April 1, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-06 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A11TG021) SUBJECT: Report on "Department's Management of Cloud Computing Services" TO: Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration Acting Under Secretary of Energy Under Secretary for Science Chief Information Officer INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Cloud computing enables convenient, on-demand access to shared computing resources that can be rapidly provided to users. According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and industry experts, benefits of the cloud computing model include the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary of Audit Report Summary of Audit Report National Nuclear Security Administration's Use of Innovative Technologies to Meet Security Requirements This document provides a summary of an Audit Report that is not publicly releasable. Public release is controlled pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act OAS-L-09-02 October 2008 The following is a summary o f a Special Access Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information Audit Report, OAS-L-09-02, dated October 31, 2008, entitled "National Nuclear Security Administration's Use o f Innovative Technologies to Meet Security Requirements. The com~lete report is not available for public disclosure. BACKGROUND The Department of Energy (Department) developed the Design Basis Threat policy (DBT), which identified the most credible threats posed by potential adversaries to Departmental assets and

442

United States Government Department of Energy DATE:  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

kE FJ325.8 d& * 9 -1 kE FJ325.8 d& * 9 -1 . (8-89) ZFG fO7440 1 United States Government Department of Energy DATE: DEC 2 3 :gg3 REPLY TO ATTN OF: EM-421 (W. A. Williams, 903-8149) SUBJECT: Elimination of the Sites from the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program TO: The File I have reviewed the attached site summaries and elimination recommendations for the following sites: e l Mitts & Merrel Co., Saginaw, Michigan l North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina l National Smelt & Refining, Cleveland, Ohio l Sutton, Steele & Steele, Dallas, Texas --------+. Norfolk Naval Station, Virginia In each case, the potential for radiological contamination above applicable guidelines is small. In each case the amounts of radioactive materials handled was small. Based on these considerations, these sites

443

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management of the NSLS-II Project Management of the NSLS-II Project OAS-RA-L-10-01 April 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (4/93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: April 6, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-01 REPLY TO ATTN TO: IG-32 (A10RA006) SUBJECT: Report on "The Department of Energy's Management of the NSLS-II Project" TO: Manager, Brookhaven Site Office, SC-BHSO INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Department of Energy's (Department) Office of Science is currently constructing the National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (Brookhaven) in Upton, New York. The NSLS-II is designed to replace the existing

444

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department's Infrastructure Department's Infrastructure Modernization Projects under the Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 OAS-RA-L-11-04 March 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: March 2, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-04 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A10RA032) SUBJECT: Report on "The Department's Infrastructure Modernization Projects under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009" TO: Manager, Oak Ridge Office Manager, Berkeley Site Office INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was enacted on February 17, 2009. The goals of the Recovery Act are to retain or create jobs, increase

445

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Audit Report Audit Report Progress in Implementing the Advanced Batteries and Hybrid Components Program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act OAS-RA-L-10-04 April 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (4/93) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: April 27, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-04 REPLY TO ATTN TO: IG-32 (A10RA025) SUBJECT: Report on "Progress in Implementing the Advanced Batteries and Hybrid Components Program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" TO: Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was enacted to

446

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Moab Mill Tailings Cleanup Moab Mill Tailings Cleanup Project OAS-RA-L-10-03 April 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: April 23, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-03 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A09ID019) SUBJECT: Report on "Moab Mill Tailings Cleanup Project" TO: Deputy Assistant Secretary, Program and Site Support, EM-50 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project (Moab Project) is located at a former uranium-ore processing facility near Moab, Utah on the west bank of the Colorado River. In 2005, the Department of Energy (Department) issued a Record of Decision to relocate, by rail, approximately 16 million tons of uranium mill tailings from

447

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Science's Energy Frontier Office of Science's Energy Frontier Research Centers OAS-RA-L-10-09 August 2010 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: August 27, 2010 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-10-09 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-32 (A10RA003) SUBJECT: Audit Report on "Office of Science's Energy Frontier Research Centers" TO: Associate Director, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, SC-22 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE In 2008, the Department of Energy's (Department) Office of Science (Science) issued a Funding Opportunity Announcement seeking applications from the scientific community for the establishment of Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs). The purpose of the EFRCs is to integrate the talent and expertise of leading scientists to accelerate the rate of

448

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management of the Tank Farm Management of the Tank Farm Recovery Act Infrastructure Upgrades Project OAS-RA-L-11-03 February 2011 DOE F 1325.8 (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy Memorandum DATE: February 9, 2011 Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-11-03 REPLY TO ATTN OF: IG-34 (A10RA043) SUBJECT: Report on "Management of the Tank Farm Recovery Act Infrastructure Upgrades Project" TO: Manager, Office of River Protection INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) the Department of Energy (Department) awarded Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) approximately $324 million to accelerate completion of infrastructure upgrades for the Hanford Site's tank farms during the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009-2011 timeframe. These funds

449

Operations & Maintenance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Rates Operations & Maintenance Operations OASIS: WACM (Note: this site is not hosted by Western and requires a digital certificate and login for full access.) wesTTrans Common...

450

SNS Target Systems Operational  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

scheduling conflict with other remote handling work planned for the next shutdown. · The target and PBW integrated monolith and hot cell structures #12;32 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy based on testing at Riken to 1.8 x 105 Gy · Improved neutronic performance and reduced remote handling

McDonald, Kirk

451

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Special Inquiries and Special Inquiries Inspection Report Concerns Regarding Academic Programs at the Bonneville Power Administration and the Savannah River Operations Office DOE/IG-0668 December 2004 CONCERNS REGARDING ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT THE BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION AND THE SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW Introduction and Objective 1 Observations and Conclusions 1 DETAILS OF FINDINGS 3 BPA Student Training Program 3 Graduate Level Courses at SRO 4 Continued Service Agreements 5 RECOMMENDATIONS 6 MANAGEMENT COMMENTS 6 INSPECTOR COMMENTS 6 APPENDICES A. Scope and Methodology 7 B. Management Comments 8 Overview INTRODUCTION The Office of Inspector General (OIG) initiated a review at two

452

Operation Diagnostics: Use of Visualization Techniques and Operation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Operation Diagnostics: Use of Visualization Techniques and Operation Operation Diagnostics: Use of Visualization Techniques and Operation Patterns to Verify and Optimize Dynamic Building and System Operation Speaker(s): Oliver Baumann Date: December 7, 2004 - 12:00pm Location: Bldg. 90 Seminar Host/Point of Contact: Peng Xu Building automation systems (BAS) and building energy management systems (BEMS) have been used in modern edifices for the last 2 decades. These systems measure, process, and monitor a huge amount of data to operate the building and systems more or less properly. Often, the data is only used to signal failures or break-downs of systems or components. Further information of the data to analyze and diagnose the building operation is not used due to the lack of analysis methods and tools. Within the Operation Diagnostics, different visualization techniques are applied to

453

Monitoring, safety systems for LNG and LPG operators  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Operators in Korea and Australia have chosen monitoring and control systems in recent contracts for LNG and LPG storage. Korea Gas Corp. (Kogas) has hired Whessoe Varec, Calais, to provide monitoring systems for four LNG storage tanks being built at Kogas` Inchon terminal. For Elgas Ltd., Port Botany, Australia, Whessoe Varec has already shipped a safety valve-shutdown system to a new LPG cavern-storage facility under construction. The paper describes the systems, terminal monitoring, dynamic approach to tank management, and meeting the growing demand for LPG.

True, W.R.

1998-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

454

Operational Awareness Tour of Building 3525 Irradiated Fuels...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report for the Operational Awareness Tour of Building 3525 Irradiated Fuels Examination Hot Cell Laboratory Dates of Activity : 10212011 Report Preparer: Tim Mengers Activity...

455

Operational Awareness Oversight of the Argonne National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report for Operational Awareness Oversight of the Argonne National Laboratory Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Dates of Activity : 07172012 - 07202012 Report Preparer: Joseph P....

456

Emergency Operations Training Academy Support Services, RFP DE...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Attachment 1 - List of Attendees Pre-Proposal Conference - Emergency Operations Training Academy Support Services, RFP DE-SOL-0003174 Date: 06 January 2012, Time: 0900-1200...

457

Power & Mobility: Defining the Financial and Operational Value...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Power & Mobility: Defining the Financial and Operational Value of Vehicle-to-Grid Technologies for the United States Department of Defense Speaker(s): Camron Gorguinpour Date:...

458

Uranium Marketing Annual Report - Release Date: May 31, 2011  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7. Uranium purchased by owners and operators of U.S. civilian nuclear power reactors by contract type and material type, 2012 deliveries 7. Uranium purchased by owners and operators of U.S. civilian nuclear power reactors by contract type and material type, 2012 deliveries thousand pounds U3O8 equivalent; dollars per pound U3O8 equivalent Spot 1 Contracts Long-Term Contracts 2 Total Material Type Quantity with Reported Price Weighted-Average Price Quantity with Reported Price Weighted-Average Price Quantity with Reported Price Weighted-Average Price U3O8 3,364 54.00 25,279 54.22 28,642 54.20 Natural UF6 W W W W W W Enriched UF6 W W W W W W Natural UF6 and Enriched UF6 4,718 48.92 23,589 57.18 28,307 55.80 Total 8,082 51.04 48,867 55.65 56,949 54.99 W = Data withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. 1 A one-time delivery (usually) of the entire contract to occur within one year of contract execution (signed date).

459

Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10/18/2013 10/18/2013 Vehicle Setup Information Downloadable Dynamometer Database (D 3 )- Test Summary Sheet Vehicle Architecture Conventional Vehicle Dynamometer Input 2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Test Cell Location Front Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date 10/18/2013 Revision Number 1 Vehicle Dynamometer Input Test weight [lb] 3516 Test Fuel Information Revision Number 1 Notes: Test weight [lb] Target A [lb] 3516 30.1456 Target B [lb/mph] Target C [lb/mph^2] 0.37653 0.015662 Test Fuel Information Fuel type 2007 Certification Diesel HF0583 Fuel density [g/ml] Fuel Net HV [BTU/lbm] 0.855 18355 Fuel type 2007 Certification Diesel HF0583 T e s t I D [ # ] C y c l e C o l d s t a r t ( C S t ) H o t s t a r t [ H S t ] D a t e T e s t C e l l T e m p [ C ] T e s t C e l l R H [ % ] T e s t C e l l B a r o [ i n / H g ] V e h i c l e c o o l i n g f a n s p e e d : S p e e d M a t

460

Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7/30/2013 7/30/2013 Vehicle Setup Information Downloadable Dynamometer Database (D 3 )- Test Summary Sheet Vehicle Architecture Alt Fuel- CNG Vehicle Dynamometer Input 2012 Honda Civic GX Test Cell Location Front Advanced Powertrain Research Facility Document Date 7/30/2013 Revision Number 1 Vehicle Dynamometer Input Test weight [lb] 3192 Test Fuel Information MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Revision Number 1 Notes: Test weight [lb] Target A [lb] 3192 22.2037 Target B [lb/mph] Target C [lb/mph^2] 0.45855 0.01263 Test Fuel Information MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Fuel type Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) MPGe derived by EPA calculation methods Fuel density [g/ml] Fuel Net HV [BTU/lbm] 0.5872 905.3 Fuel type Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) T e s t I D [ # ] C y c l e C o l d s t a r t ( C S t ) H o t s t a r t

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Integrated Designs to Integrated Operations using BMS  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Integrated Designs to Integrated Operations using BMS Speaker(s): Punit Desai Date: February 6, 2013 - 12:15pm Location: 90-3122 Seminar HostPoint of Contact: Girish Ghatikar The...

462

Contractor Fee Payments- Idaho Operations Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

See the amount of fees earned on EM's major contracts for each evaluated fee period and the total contract to date at the Idaho Operations Office on these charts.

463

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2011 CX-005103: Categorical Exclusion Determination Operation of Zeiss Sigma VP Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01122011 Location(s): Aiken, South...

464

Contractor Fee Payments- Oak Ridge Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

See the amount of fees earned on EM's major contracts for each evaluated fee period and the total contract to date at the Oak Ridge Operations on these charts.  

465

Property:GBIG/ObservationEndDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

ObservationEndDate Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleProperty:GBIGObservationEndDate&oldid5093...

466

Property:ASHRAE 169 End Date | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

property of type Date. Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleProperty:ASHRAE169EndDate&oldid21585" What links here Related changes Special pages Printable...

467

Carbon dating impacts non-proliferation, drug research and climate...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

25 years of carbon dating. Carbon dating impacts non-proliferation, drug research and climate change Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Lawrence Livermore...

468

Property:Incentive/StartDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

StartDate StartDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Incentive/StartDate Property Type Date Description Start Date. In order to see all values for this property, Property:Incentive/StartDateString should be used in queries until only valid dates are in this property. Currently, some entries include notes after the date or are just notes. Subproperties This property has the following 50 subproperties: A Alcohol Fuels Exemption (Hawaii) Alternative Energy Personal Property Tax Exemption (Michigan) Anne Arundel County - Solar and Geothermal Equipment Property Tax Credits (Maryland) B Broward County - Energy Sense Appliance Rebate Program (Florida) C CCEF - Commercial, Industrial, Institutional PV Grant Program (Connecticut) California Solar Initiative - Solar Thermal Program (California)

469

Operational readiness review for the Waste Experimental Reduction Facility. Final report  

SciTech Connect

An Operational Readiness Review (ORR) at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory`s (INEL`s) Waste Experimental Reduction Facility (WERF) was conducted by EG&G Idaho, Inc., to verify the readiness of WERF to resume operations following a shutdown and modification period of more than two years. It is the conclusion of the ORR Team that, pending satisfactory resolution of all pre-startup findings, WERF has achieved readiness to resume unrestricted operations within the approved safety basis. ORR appraisal forms are included in this report.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

Report of the Task Group on operation Department of Energy tritium facilities  

SciTech Connect

This report discusses the following topics on the operation of DOE Tritium facilities: Environment, Safety, and Health Aspects of Tritium; Management of Operations and Maintenance Functions; Safe Shutdown of Tritium Facilities; Management of the Facility Safety Envelope; Maintenance of Qualified Tritium Handling Personnel; DOE Tritium Management Strategy; Radiological Control Philosophy; Implementation of DOE Requirements; Management of Tritium Residues; Inconsistent Application of Requirements for Measurement of Tritium Effluents; Interdependence of Tritium Facilities; Technical Communication among Facilities; Incorporation of Confinement Technologies into New Facilities; Operation/Management Requirements for New Tritium Facilities; and Safety Management Issues at Department of Energy Tritium Facilities.

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho Operations Office Idaho Operations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Idaho Operations Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 11, 2013 CX-010699: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Boulevard Annex Lease Termination CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/11/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office July 11, 2013 CX-010698: Categorical Exclusion Determination Modeling and Validation of Sodium Plugging for Heat Exchangers in Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor Systems CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/11/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office June 25, 2013 CX-010701: Categorical Exclusion Determination Materials and Fuels Complex Diversion Dam CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 06/25/2013

472

GNF2 Operating Experience  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

GNF's latest generation fuel product, GNF2, is designed to deliver improved nuclear efficiency, higher bundle and cycle energy capability, and more operational flexibility. But along with high performance, our customers face a growing need for absolute fuel reliability. This is driven by a general sense in the industry that LWR fuel reliability has plateaued. Too many plants are operating with fuel leakers, and the impact on plant operations and operator focus is unacceptable. The industry has responded by implementing an INPO-coordinated program aimed at achieving leaker-free reliability by 2010. One focus area of the program is the relationship between fuel performance (i.e., duty) and reliability. The industry recognizes that the right balance between performance and problem-free fuel reliability is critical. In the development of GNF2, GNF understood the requirement for a balanced solution and utilized a product development and introduction strategy that specifically addressed reliability: evolutionary design features supported by an extensive experience base; thoroughly tested components; and defense-in-depth mitigation of all identified failure mechanisms. The final proof test that the balance has been achieved is the application of the design, initially through lead use assemblies (LUAs), in a variety of plants that reflect the diversity of the BWR fleet. Regular detailed surveillance of these bundles provides the verification that the proper balance between performance and reliability has been achieved. GNF currently has GNF2 lead use assemblies operating in five plants. Included are plants that have implemented extended power up-rates, plants on one and two-year operating cycles, and plants with and without NobleChem{sup TM} and zinc injection. The leading plant has undergone three pool-side inspections outages to date. This paper reviews the actions taken to insure GNF2's reliability, and the lead use assembly surveillance data accumulated to date to validate the adequacy/expected behavior of the design. (authors)

Schardt, John [GE Energy, Nuclear, 3901 Castle Hayne Road, Wilmington, NC 28402 (United States)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

Integrated formal operations plan  

SciTech Connect

The concept of formal operations (that is, a collection of business practices to assure effective, accountable operations) has vexed the Laboratory for many years. To date most attempts at developing such programs have been based upon rigid, compliance-based interpretations of a veritable mountain of Department of Energy (DOE) orders, directives, notices, and standards. These DOE dictates seldom take the broad view but focus on highly specialized programs isolated from the overall context of formal operations. The result is a confusing array of specific, and often contradictory, requirements that produce a patchwork of overlapping niche programs. This unnecessary duplication wastes precious resources, dramatically increases the complexity of our work processes, and communicates a sense of confusion to our customers and regulators. Coupled with the artificial divisions that have historically existed among the Laboratory`s formal operations organizations (quality assurance, configuration management, records management, training, etc.), this approach has produced layers of increasingly vague and complex formal operations plans, each of which interprets its parent and adds additional requirements of its own. Organizational gridlock ensues whenever an activity attempts to implement these bureaucratic monstrosities. The integrated formal operations plan presented is to establish a set of requirements that must be met by an integrated formal operations program, assign responsibilities for implementation and operation of the program, and specify criteria against which the performance of the program will be measured. The accountable line manager specifies the items, processes, and information (the controlled elements) to which the formal operations program specified applies. The formal operations program is implemented using a graded approach based on the level of importance of the various controlled elements and the scope of the activities in which they are involved.

Cort, G.; Dearholt, W.; Donahue, S.; Frank, J.; Perkins, B.; Tyler, R.; Wrye, J.

1994-01-05T23:59:59.000Z

474

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Procurement of Safety Procurement of Safety Class/Safety-Significant Items at the Savannah River Site DOE/IG-0814 April 2009 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 23, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Procurement of Safety-Class/Safety-Significant Items at the Savannah River Site" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy operates several nuclear facilities at its Savannah River Site, and several additional facilities are under construction. This includes the National Nuclear Security Administration's Tritium Extraction Facility (TEF) which is designated to help maintain the reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. The Mixed Oxide Fuel

475

Date centerdTimes New Roman  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

K Basins Sludge Treatment Project at the Hanford Site DOE/IG-0848 February 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 February 17, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's K Basins Sludge Treatment Project at the Hanford Site" BACKGROUND In 1999, the Department of Energy's Richland Operations Office (Richland), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Washington State Department of Ecology signed an agreement for the remediation of two spent nuclear fuel storage basins located in the 100 K-Area of the Hanford Site. This agreement required the Department to retrieve and package for

476

Climate Data Operators (CDO)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Climate Climate Data Operators (CDO) Climate Data Operators (CDO) Description and Overview CDO is a large tool set for working on climate data. NetCDF 3/4, GRIB including SZIP compression, EXTRA, SERVICE and IEG are supported as IO-formats. Apart from that cdo can be used to analyse any kind gridded data not related to climate science. CDO has very small memory requirements and can process files larger than the physical memory. How to Use CDO module load cdo cdo [Options] Operators ... Further Information CDO Online Documentation Availability Package Platform Category Version Module Install Date Date Made Default cdo carver libraries/ I/O 1.4.1 cdo/1.4.1 2012-01-13 2012-01-13 cdo carver libraries/ I/O 1.4.6 cdo/1.4.6 2012-05-24 2012-05-25 cdo carver libraries/ I/O 1.6.1 cdo/1.6.1 2013-07-02

477

Intitule Date Enseignant Intitule Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna 59 0 4 -0 2 AD 3 04-avr MAC  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 Page 1 Intitule Date Enseignant Intitule Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna 59 0 4 - 0 2 AD 3 04-avr Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna 34 12-avr DT 69 02-mai RL EL QOTBI Noemie 51 11-avr AD 41 30-avr DT FATMI

Douai, Antoine

478

Intitule Date Enseignant Intitule Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna 28 5 dc. CC 4 3 18 dc. DT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Page 1 Page 1 Intitule Date Enseignant Intitule Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna 28 5 déc. CC 4 3 18 déc Nabil 9 17 déc. SJ 4 0 14 déc. DT Intitule Date Enseignant AKIN Tuna 22 20 déc. PJ EL QOTBI Noemie 63 6

Douai, Antoine

479

Property:File/CreationDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

CreationDate CreationDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name File/CreationDate Property Type Date Description Original creation date for the file. Note that this is usually not the same as the date when the file was first uploaded to OpenEI. Pages using the property "File/CreationDate" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B BOEMRE OCS.oil.gas.2007-12.map.pdf + 12 September 2008 + BOEMRE atlantic.OCS.multiple.use.map.2003.pdf + October 2003 + BOEMRE lease.platforms.santa.barb.map.5.2010.pdf + 18 May 2010 + BOEMRE oil.gas.plant.platform.sta.brbra.map.4.2010.pdf + April 2010 + BOEMRE platforms.leases.longbeach.map.5.2010.pdf + May 2010 + Banglmetst 221.pdf + 29 December 2004 + Black.Warrior.Basin usgs.map.pdf + 2007 + BrazilTMYst 238.pdf + 1 February 2005 +

480

Property:Incentive/StartDateString | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

StartDateString StartDateString Jump to: navigation, search Property Name Incentive/StartDateString Property Type String Description Start Date string property. Use this property in queries until the Property:Incentive/StartDate property is populated with valid dates only. Currently, some are populated with additional notes included. Pages using the property "Incentive/StartDateString" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 3 30% Business Tax Credit for Solar (Vermont) + 01/01/2009 + A AEP Appalachian Power - Commercial and Industrial Rebate Programs (West Virginia) + 3/11/2011 + AEP Appalachian Power - Residential Home Retrofit Program (West Virginia) + 3/11/2011 + AEP Ohio - Commercial Self Direct Rebate Program (Ohio) + 1/1/2008 +

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "operation date shutdown" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481