National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for oklahoma monthly seismic

  1. Oklahoma

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Oklahoma

  2. Oklahoma - Compare - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Oklahoma Oklahoma

  3. Oklahoma - Rankings - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Oklahoma Oklahoma

  4. Oklahoma - Search - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Oklahoma Oklahoma

  5. Oklahoma County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    City, Oklahoma Nichols Hills, Oklahoma Nicoma Park, Oklahoma Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Smith Village, Oklahoma Spencer, Oklahoma The Village, Oklahoma Valley Brook, Oklahoma Warr...

  6. Okmulgee County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    County, Oklahoma Beggs, Oklahoma Dewar, Oklahoma Grayson, Oklahoma Henryetta, Oklahoma Hoffman, Oklahoma Liberty, Oklahoma Morris, Oklahoma Okmulgee, Oklahoma Schulter, Oklahoma...

  7. Bryan County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oklahoma Bennington, Oklahoma Bokchito, Oklahoma Caddo, Oklahoma Calera, Oklahoma Colbert, Oklahoma Durant, Oklahoma Hendrix, Oklahoma Kemp, Oklahoma Kenefic, Oklahoma Mead,...

  8. Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Asher, Oklahoma Bethel Acres, Oklahoma Brooksville, Oklahoma Earlsboro, Oklahoma Johnson, Oklahoma Macomb, Oklahoma Maud, Oklahoma McLoud, Oklahoma Oklahoma City, Oklahoma...

  9. Blaine County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in Blaine County, Oklahoma Canton, Oklahoma Geary, Oklahoma Greenfield, Oklahoma Hitchcock, Oklahoma Hydro, Oklahoma Longdale, Oklahoma Okeene, Oklahoma Watonga, Oklahoma...

  10. Payne County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oklahoma Drumright, Oklahoma Glencoe, Oklahoma Mulhall, Oklahoma Orlando, Oklahoma Perkins, Oklahoma Ripley, Oklahoma Stillwater, Oklahoma Yale, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:...

  11. Comanche County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oklahoma Cache, Oklahoma Chattanooga, Oklahoma Elgin, Oklahoma Faxon, Oklahoma Fletcher, Oklahoma Geronimo, Oklahoma Indiahoma, Oklahoma Lawton, Oklahoma Medicine Park,...

  12. Garfield County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in Garfield County, Oklahoma Breckenridge, Oklahoma Carrier, Oklahoma Covington, Oklahoma Douglas, Oklahoma Drummond, Oklahoma Enid, Oklahoma Fairmont, Oklahoma Garber, Oklahoma...

  13. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Oklahoma | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Oklahoma Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Oklahoma Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Oklahoma. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD May 29, 2014 CX-012125: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pressure Prediction and Hazard Avoidance Through Improved Seismic Imaging CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 05/29/2014 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory May 21, 2014 CX-012147: Categorical Exclusion Determination Ion Advanced Solvent

  14. Sequoyah County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Notchietown, Oklahoma Paradise Hill, Oklahoma Pinhook Corners, Oklahoma Redbird Smith, Oklahoma Remy, Oklahoma Roland, Oklahoma Sallisaw, Oklahoma Short, Oklahoma Stoney...

  15. Advanced Reservoir Characterization and Development through High-Resolution 3C3D Seismic and Horizontal Drilling: Eva South Marrow Sand Unit, Texas County, Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Wheeler,David M.; Miller, William A.; Wilson, Travis C.

    2002-03-11

    The Eva South Morrow Sand Unit is located in western Texas County, Oklahoma. The field produces from an upper Morrow sandstone, termed the Eva sandstone, deposited in a transgressive valley-fill sequence. The field is defined as a combination structural stratigraphic trap; the reservoir lies in a convex up -dip bend in the valley and is truncated on the west side by the Teepee Creek fault. Although the field has been a successful waterflood since 1993, reservoir heterogeneity and compartmentalization has impeded overall sweep efficiency. A 4.25 square mile high-resolution, three component three-dimensional (3C3D) seismic survey was acquired in order to improve reservoir characterization and pinpoint the optimal location of a new horizontal producing well, the ESU 13-H.

  16. Wagoner County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Arrow, Oklahoma Catoosa, Oklahoma Coweta, Oklahoma Fair Oaks, Oklahoma Okay, Oklahoma Porter, Oklahoma Redbird, Oklahoma Tullahassee, Oklahoma Tulsa, Oklahoma Wagoner, Oklahoma...

  17. Coal County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oklahoma Bromide, Oklahoma Centrahoma, Oklahoma Coalgate, Oklahoma Lehigh, Oklahoma Phillips, Oklahoma Tupelo, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  18. Cleveland County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Veolia Energy Places in Cleveland County, Oklahoma Etowah, Oklahoma Lexington, Oklahoma Moore, Oklahoma Noble, Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Purcell, Oklahoma...

  19. Canadian County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in Canadian County, Oklahoma Calumet, Oklahoma El Reno, Oklahoma Geary, Oklahoma Mustang, Oklahoma Okarche, Oklahoma Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Piedmont, Oklahoma Union City,...

  20. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    congressional district and Oklahoma's 5th congressional district.12 US Recovery Act Smart Grid Projects in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company Smart...

  1. Hughes County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oklahoma Holdenville, Oklahoma Horntown, Oklahoma Lamar, Oklahoma Spaulding, Oklahoma Stuart, Oklahoma Wetumka, Oklahoma Yeager, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  2. Mayes County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Murphy, Oklahoma Pensacola, Oklahoma Pin Oak Acres, Oklahoma Pryor Creek, Oklahoma Pump Back, Oklahoma Salina, Oklahoma Sams Corner, Oklahoma Snake Creek, Oklahoma Spavinaw,...

  3. Johnston County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in Johnston County, Oklahoma Bromide, Oklahoma Mannsville, Oklahoma Milburn, Oklahoma Mill Creek, Oklahoma Ravia, Oklahoma Tishomingo, Oklahoma Wapanucka, Oklahoma Retrieved from...

  4. Ottawa County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Zone Subtype A. Places in Ottawa County, Oklahoma Afton, Oklahoma Cardin, Oklahoma Commerce, Oklahoma Dotyville, Oklahoma Fairland, Oklahoma Miami, Oklahoma Narcissa, Oklahoma...

  5. McClain County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Zone Subtype A. Places in McClain County, Oklahoma Blanchard, Oklahoma Byars, Oklahoma Cole, Oklahoma Dibble, Oklahoma Goldsby, Oklahoma Newcastle, Oklahoma Purcell, Oklahoma...

  6. Grady County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Zone Subtype A. Places in Grady County, Oklahoma Alex, Oklahoma Amber, Oklahoma Blanchard, Oklahoma Bradley, Oklahoma Bridge Creek, Oklahoma Chickasha, Oklahoma Minco,...

  7. Beckham County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Zone Subtype A. Places in Beckham County, Oklahoma Carter, Oklahoma Elk City, Oklahoma Erick, Oklahoma Sayre, Oklahoma Sweetwater, Oklahoma Texola, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:...

  8. Le Flore County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Zone Subtype A. Places in Le Flore County, Oklahoma Arkoma, Oklahoma Bokoshe, Oklahoma Cameron, Oklahoma Cowlington, Oklahoma Fanshawe, Oklahoma Fort Coffee, Oklahoma Heavener,...

  9. Stephens County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Central High, Oklahoma Comanche, Oklahoma Duncan, Oklahoma Empire City, Oklahoma Loco, Oklahoma Marlow, Oklahoma Velma, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  10. Washita County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Number 3 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Washita County, Oklahoma Bessie, Oklahoma Burns Flat, Oklahoma Canute, Oklahoma Clinton, Oklahoma Colony, Oklahoma Corn, Oklahoma Dill...

  11. Pittsburg County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oklahoma Krebs, Oklahoma Longtown, Oklahoma McAlester, Oklahoma Pittsburg, Oklahoma Quinton, Oklahoma Savanna, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  12. Adair County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Number 3 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Adair County, Oklahoma Bell, Oklahoma Cherry Tree, Oklahoma Chewey, Oklahoma Christie, Oklahoma Fairfield, Oklahoma Greasy, Oklahoma...

  13. Custer County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Number 3 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Custer County, Oklahoma Arapaho, Oklahoma Butler, Oklahoma Clinton, Oklahoma Custer City, Oklahoma Hammon, Oklahoma Thomas, Oklahoma...

  14. Muskogee County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oklahoma Sour John, Oklahoma Summit, Oklahoma Taft, Oklahoma Wainwright, Oklahoma Warner, Oklahoma Webbers Falls, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  15. Washington County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Subtype A. Places in Washington County, Oklahoma Bartlesville, Oklahoma Copan, Oklahoma Dewey, Oklahoma Ochelata, Oklahoma Ramona, Oklahoma Vera, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:...

  16. Woods County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    County, Oklahoma Alva, Oklahoma Avard, Oklahoma Capron, Oklahoma Dacoma, Oklahoma Freedom, Oklahoma Waynoka, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  17. Smart Meters Helping Oklahoma Consumers Save Hundreds During...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Smart Meters Helping Oklahoma Consumers Save Hundreds During Summer Heat July 26, 2011 - ... on Good Morning America that he's saving over 320 per month compared to last ...

  18. Noble County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    County, Oklahoma Billings, Oklahoma Marland, Oklahoma Morrison, Oklahoma Perry, Oklahoma Red Rock, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleNobleCounty,Okl...

  19. Pawnee County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Climate Zone Number 3 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Pawnee County, Oklahoma Blackburn, Oklahoma Cleveland, Oklahoma Hallett, Oklahoma Jennings, Oklahoma Mannford,...

  20. Smart Meters Helping Oklahoma Consumers Save Hundreds During Summer Heat

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Smart meters -- just one of the advanced technologies being used to modernize the grid -- are helping Oklahoma businesses and home owners beat high electricity bills not only during these summer months, but year-round.

  1. Fact Sheet Oklahoma Climatological Survey The Oklahoma Mesonet

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    mesonet.org Revised: May 2007 Fact Sheet Oklahoma Climatological Survey The Oklahoma Mesonet The Oklahoma Mesonet is a world-class network of environmental monitoring stations. Mesonet data have the capacity to help save lives, save Oklahoma taxpayers and businesses millions of dollars annually, increase energy effciency, educate the next generation of citi- zens, and make an incalculable contribution to research projects every year. The Oklahoma Mesonet is a joint partnership between The

  2. Key Renewable Energy Opportunities for Oklahoma Tribes | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Key Renewable Energy Opportunities for Oklahoma Tribes Key Renewable Energy Opportunities for Oklahoma Tribes August 13, 2012 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Cox Convention Center The...

  3. Latimer County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Number 3 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Latimer County, Oklahoma Fanshawe, Oklahoma Red Oak, Oklahoma Wilburton, Oklahoma Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  4. Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Oklahoma

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 166,776 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016 Referring Pages: NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Oklahoma-Oklahoma

  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Processed in Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Processed in Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 1,121,999 1,282,707 1,349,870 1,670,265 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Processed Oklahoma-Oklahoma

  6. Organization: Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    * Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma ØFederally Recognized Indian Tribe ØCentral Oklahoma (between OKC & Tulsa) ØStrong Commitment to Energy Efficiency & Renewables * BKJ Solutions, Inc. ØTribally Owned Construction Company ØConstruction with USACE, IHS, BIA & Tribe ØFuture Renewable Energy Development Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma's traditional jurisdictional lands FEASIBILITY GRANT * Objectives ØConduct in-Depth Feasibility Study of Wind Energy ØIdentify & Address Technical Issues Related

  7. Oklahoma/Incentives | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Yes Property Tax Exemption for Wind Generators (Oklahoma) Property Tax Incentive Yes Red River Valley REA - Heat Pump Loan Program (Oklahoma) Utility Loan Program Yes...

  8. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    in Tulsa, Oklahoma Harvest Solar Utility Companies in Tulsa, Oklahoma Earth Power Resources Inc References US Census Bureau Incorporated place and minor civil division...

  9. Full Reviews: Seismicity and Seismic

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Below are the project presentations and respective peer reviewer comments for Seismicity and Seismic.

  10. Johnson, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Johnson is a town in Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma. It falls under Oklahoma's 5th...

  11. Purcell, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Purcell is a city in Cleveland County and McClain County, Oklahoma. It falls under Oklahoma's...

  12. Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma Wind Feasibility Study

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Oklahoma Wind Feasibility Study ORGANIZATION * Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma Federally Recognized Indian Tribe Central Oklahoma (between OKC & Tulsa) Strong Commitment to Energy Efficiency & Renewables * BKJ Solutions, Inc. Tribally Owned Construction Company Construction with USACE, IHS, BIA & Tribe Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma's traditional jurisdictional lands FEASIBILITY GRANT * Objectives Conduct in-Depth Feasibility Study of Wind Energy Identify & Address Technical

  13. Smith Village, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Smith Village is a town in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. It falls under Oklahoma's 5th...

  14. Forest Park, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Forest Park is a town in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. It falls under Oklahoma's 5th congressional...

  15. Key Renewable Energy Opportunities for Oklahoma Tribes

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    KEY RENEWABLE ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR OKLAHOMA TRIBES August 13, 2012 COX CONVENTION CENTER 100 West Sheridan Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 73102 (405) 602-8500 The fifth in a series of planned U.S. DOE Office of Indian Energy-sponsored strategic energy development & investment forums, this forum is designed to give Oklahoma tribal leaders the opportunity to receive the latest updates on DOE's energy development efforts in Indian Country. The Forum will provide a venue for tribal leaders to

  16. Oklahoma Corporate Commission Oil and Gas | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Corporate Commission Oil and Gas Jump to: navigation, search Name: Oklahoma Corporate Commission Oil and Gas Place: Oklahoma Zip: 73152-2000 Website: www.occeweb.comogoghome.htm...

  17. Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone | Open...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Jump to: navigation, search County Climate Zone Place Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ASHRAE Standard ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone...

  18. Tulsa County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Zone Subtype A. Registered Energy Companies in Tulsa County, Oklahoma Harvest Solar Sun City Solar Energy Utility Companies in Tulsa County, Oklahoma Earth Power Resources Inc...

  19. City of Lexington, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Lexington, Oklahoma (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Lexington Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: (405) 527-6123 Website: www.cityoflexington.comutilit...

  20. Oklahoma Wind Energy Center - A | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    A Jump to: navigation, search Name Oklahoma Wind Energy Center - A Facility Oklahoma Wind Energy Center - A Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status...

  1. Oklahoma Wind Energy Center - B | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    B Jump to: navigation, search Name Oklahoma Wind Energy Center - B Facility Oklahoma Wind Energy Center - B Sector Wind energy Facility Type Commercial Scale Wind Facility Status...

  2. Oklahoma Natural Gas - Residential Efficiency Rebates | Department...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    250 Clothes Dryer: up to 500 Summary To encourage customers to install high-efficiency natural gas equipment in homes, Oklahoma Natural Gas offers rebates to residential...

  3. Oklahoma/Wind Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Guidebook >> Oklahoma Wind Resources WindTurbine-icon.png Small Wind Guidebook * Introduction * First, How Can I Make My Home More Energy Efficient? * Is Wind Energy Practical...

  4. Bixby, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    1st congressional district.12 Registered Energy Companies in Bixby, Oklahoma Sun City Solar Energy References US Census Bureau Incorporated place and minor civil...

  5. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas (AOG) Residential Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Arkansas Oklahoma Gas (AOG) provides financial incentives to its residential and small commercial customers for both existing and new construction homes and small business whose primary fuel for...

  6. Moore, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Moore, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.3395079, -97.4867028 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingservic...

  7. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Tulsa, Oklahoma: Energy Resources (Redirected from Tulsa, OK) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.1539816, -95.992775 Show Map Loading map......

  8. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2014,"06301967" ,"Release...

  9. Porter, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Porter, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.8709334, -95.522476 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingservic...

  10. Mustang, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Mustang, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.384226, -97.7244867 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingservi...

  11. Recovery Act State Memos Oklahoma

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Oklahoma For questions about DOE's Recovery Act activities, please contact the DOE Recovery Act Clearinghouse: 1-888-DOE-RCVY (888-363-7289), Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov/contactUs.htm. All numbers and projects listed as of June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACT SNAPSHOT................................................................................... 1 FUNDING ALLOCATION

  12. Selenium in Oklahoma ground water and soil

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Atalay, A.; Vir Maggon, D.

    1991-03-30

    Selenium with a consumption of 2 liters per day (5). The objectives of this study are: (1) to determine the concentrations of Se in Oklahoma ground water and soil samples. (2) to map the geographical distribution of Se species in Oklahoma. (3) to relate groundwater depth, pH and geology with concentration of Se.

  13. GE Global Research in Oklahoma City

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Oklahoma City, USA Oklahoma City, USA GE's first sector-specific global research center is dedicated to developing and accelerating innovative oil and gas technologies. Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window) Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Visit the Careers page to search and apply for Global Research jobs in Oklahoma City. We also welcome

  14. Oklahoma Electric Cooperative- Energy Efficiency Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Oklahoma Energy Cooperative (OEC) offers rebates to residential customers for the purchase of air-source heat pumps, geothermal heat pumps and water heaters. Air-source heat pumps are eligible for...

  15. Oklahoma Electric Coop Inc | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Electric Coop Inc Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: 1-405-321-2024 Website: www.okcoop.org Twitter: @okcoop Facebook: https:www.facebook.comOklaElec Outage Hotline: 405-321-2024...

  16. Iowas of Oklahoma Renewable Energy Project

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    FUN * Involved in a Renewable Energy Project Grant Application - April 2009 Notification - September 2009 Finalized Details - March 2010 Project Kickoff - May 2010 * Cutting Edge Technology * Economic Development for Tribe FORTUNATE * Project Manager * Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma Federally Recognized Indian Tribe Central Oklahoma (between OKC & Tulsa) Fewer than 700 Tribal Members * BKJ Solutions, Inc. 8(a) / HUBZone Certified Business with SBA Construction with U.S.

  17. Rich Mountain Elec Coop, Inc (Oklahoma) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Inc (Oklahoma) Jump to: navigation, search Name: Rich Mountain Elec Coop, Inc Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: 1-877-828-4074 Website: www.rmec.com Outage Hotline: 1-877-828-4074...

  18. El Reno, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. El Reno is a city in Canadian County, Oklahoma. It falls under Oklahoma's 3rd congressional...

  19. City of Orlando, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Orlando, Oklahoma (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Orlando Place: Oklahoma References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for 2010 - File1a1 EIA Form...

  20. Texas Onshore Natural Gas Processed in Oklahoma (Million Cubic...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Texas Onshore Natural Gas Processed in Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

  1. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per Thousand...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    586-8800",,,"1292016 12:16:15 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Oklahoma Natural Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","N3035OK3" "Date","Oklahoma...

  2. City of Perry, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    City of Perry, Oklahoma (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Perry Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: 580-336-4241 or 580-336-4113 or 580-336-4111 Website:...

  3. SBOT OKLAHOMA SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMIN POC Gary Bridges Telephone

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    OKLAHOMA SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMIN POC Gary Bridges Telephone (918) 595-6671 Email gary.bridges@swpa

  4. Community-Scale Project Development and Finance Workshop: Oklahoma |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Oklahoma Community-Scale Project Development and Finance Workshop: Oklahoma June 9, 2015 - 10:19am Addthis June 9-11, 2015 Norman, Oklahoma Riverwind Hotel and Casino The DOE Office of Indian Energy hosted a Community-Scale Renewable Energy Project Development and Finance Workshop June 9-11, 2015, at the Riverwind Hotel and Casino in Norman, Oklahoma. Download the agenda and presentations. Addthis Related Articles Ted Wright of the Stillaguamish Tribe and Shannon Loeve

  5. Oklahoma Recovery Act State Memo | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Oklahoma Recovery Act State Memo Oklahoma Recovery Act State Memo Oklahoma has substantial natural resources, including oil, gas, solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) is making a meaningful down payment on the nation's energy and environmental future. The Recovery Act investments in Oklahoma are supporting a broad range of clean energy projects from energy efficiency and the smart grid to environmental cleanup and geothermal. Through these

  6. Wind Resources on Tribal Land. Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Holiday, Michelle

    2015-03-27

    Final project report submitted by the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma for the Department of Energy Wind Energy Grant

  7. Chickasaw National Recreational Area, Chickasaw, Oklahoma | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Chickasaw National Recreational Area, Chickasaw, Oklahoma Chickasaw National Recreational Area, Chickasaw, Oklahoma Photo of Comfort Station at the Chickasaw National Recreation Area The Chickasaw National Recreation Area is located 100 miles south of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on the Lake of the Arbuckles. To save taxpayers' money and minimize adverse impacts on the environment, the National Park Service (NPS) recently incorporated solar energy into the design of three new comfort

  8. Alternative Fuels Data Center: Oklahoma Transportation Data for Alternative

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

    Fuels and Vehicles Oklahoma Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Oklahoma Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Oklahoma Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Oklahoma Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center:

  9. One West Third Street Tulsa, Oklahoma

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Third Street Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-3502 918-595-6600 Fax 918-595-6656 www.swpa.gov The UPDATE is published by and for customers, retirees, and employees of Southwestern Power Administration like: Katherine (K.C.) Thomas Director, Division of Information Technology (CIO) Tulsa, Oklahoma Special thanks to: Ron Beck Miya Boyken Ashley Butler Scott Carpenter Mike Deihl Ruben Garcia William Hiller David Kannady Jim McDonald Beth Nielsen Fritha Ohlson Tracey Stewart U P D AT E S O U T H W E S T E R N

  10. Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Production (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 58 68 82 69 55 2010's 45 39 68 65 61 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Estimated Production Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves

  11. Oklahoma Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Shale Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 944 3,845 6,389 2010's 9,670 10,733 12,572 12,675 16,653 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Oklahoma Shale Gas

  12. Monthly Reports

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2012 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These reports cover the completed activities for the current month and the expectations for the following month. Should you have questions about the EM Monthly Reports please contact envmgt@nv.doe.gov or call (702) 295-3521. October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2011 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June

  13. Monthly Reports

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2013 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These reports cover the completed activities for the current month and the expectations for the following month. Should you have questions about the EM Monthly Reports please contact envmgt@nv.doe.gov or call (702) 295-3521. October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June

  14. Monthly Reports

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2014 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These reports cover the completed activities for the current month and the expectations for the following month. Should you have questions about the EM Monthly Reports please contact envmgt@nv.doe.gov or call (702) 295-3521. October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June

  15. Monthly Reports

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2015 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These reports cover the completed activities for the current month and the expectations for the following month. Should you have questions about the EM Monthly Reports please contact envmgt@nv.doe.gov or call (702) 295-3521. October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June

  16. Monthly Reports

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2015 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These reports cover the completed activities for the current month and the expectations for the following month. Should you have questions about the EM Monthly Reports please contact envmgt@nv.doe.gov or call (702) 295-3521. October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 Send mail to nssab@nnsa.doe.gov with

  17. Kansas Natural Gas Processed in Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Kansas Natural Gas Processed in Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 804 775 703 248 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Processed Kansas-Oklahoma

  18. Kansas Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Oklahoma (Million

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Cubic Feet) Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Kansas Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Oklahoma (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 7 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016 Referring Pages: NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Kansas-Oklahoma

  19. Rocky Mountain, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Rocky Mountain, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.8053663, -94.7674486 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  20. Warr Acres, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Warr Acres, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.5225567, -97.6189304 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappings...

  1. Alfalfa County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Alfalfa County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.7435919, -98.3964938 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapp...

  2. City of Edmond, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Edmond Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: (405) 359-4541 Website: www.edmondok.comindex.aspx?NI Twitter: @cityofedmond Facebook: https:www.facebook.comcoedmond Outage Hotline: After...

  3. Valley Brook, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Valley Brook, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.4020066, -97.4814258 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappin...

  4. Cotton County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Cotton County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 34.309094, -98.3964938 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappin...

  5. Cherry Tree, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Tree, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.7414755, -94.6432774 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingservice...

  6. Valley Park, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Park, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.2928744, -95.737483 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingservice"...

  7. Woodlawn Park, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Woodlawn Park, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.5114455, -97.6500419 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappi...

  8. Nicoma Park, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Nicoma Park, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 35.4911731, -97.3230893 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapping...

  9. Texas County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Texas County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia...

  10. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma...

  11. Oklahoma Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Million...

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun...

  12. Dewey County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Dewey County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.017265, -98.9245343 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapping...

  13. Love County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Love County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 33.985839, -97.2221421 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappings...

  14. Sand Springs, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Sand Springs, Oklahoma: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 36.1398102, -96.108891 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapping...

  15. Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority- WISE Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (OMPA) offers residential customers rebates on a variety of HVAC equipment through its WISE Rebate program. This program encourages residential customers and...

  16. Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority- Commercial and Industrial Energy Efficiency Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (OMPA) offers the Demand and Energy Efficiency Program (DEEP) to eligible commercial, industrial, and municipal government customers served by OMPA. This...

  17. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price (Dollars per Thousand...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2012 ,"Release...

  18. Monthly Energy

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    to help us understand the issues affecting energy supply and demand, the economy, and the environment. I have just come aboard as the Administrator of EIA. The Monthly Energy...

  19. Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics (OCHEP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    S. Nandi; M.J. Strauss; J. Snow; F. Rizatdinova; B. Abbott; K. Babu; P. Gutierrez; C. Kao; A. Khanov; K.A. Milton; H. Neaman; H. Severini, P. Skubic

    2012-02-29

    The DOE EPSCoR implementation grant, with the support from the State of Oklahoma and from the three universities, Oklahoma State University, University of Oklahoma and Langston University, resulted in establishing of the Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics (OCHEP) in 2004. Currently, OCHEP continues to flourish as a vibrant hub for research in experimental and theoretical particle physics and an educational center in the State of Oklahoma. All goals of the original proposal were successfully accomplished. These include foun- dation of a new experimental particle physics group at OSU, the establishment of a Tier 2 computing facility for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and Tevatron data analysis at OU and organization of a vital particle physics research center in Oklahoma based on resources of the three universities. OSU has hired two tenure-track faculty members with initial support from the grant funds. Now both positions are supported through OSU budget. This new HEP Experimental Group at OSU has established itself as a full member of the Fermilab D0 Collaboration and LHC ATLAS Experiment and has secured external funds from the DOE and the NSF. These funds currently support 2 graduate students, 1 postdoctoral fellow, and 1 part-time engineer. The grant initiated creation of a Tier 2 computing facility at OU as part of the Southwest Tier 2 facility, and a permanent Research Scientist was hired at OU to maintain and run the facility. Permanent support for this position has now been provided through the OU university budget. OCHEP represents a successful model of cooperation of several universities, providing the establishment of critical mass of manpower, computing and hardware resources. This led to increasing Oklahoma’s impact in all areas of HEP, theory, experiment, and computation. The Center personnel are involved in cutting edge research in experimental, theoretical, and computational aspects of High Energy Physics with the research areas ranging from the search for new phenomena at the Fermilab Tevatron and the CERN Large Hadron Collider to theoretical modeling, computer simulation, detector development and testing, and physics analysis. OCHEP faculty members participating on the D0 collaboration at the Fermilab Tevatron and on the ATLAS collaboration at the CERN LHC have made major impact on the Standard Model (SM) Higgs boson search, top quark studies, B physics studies, and measurements of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) phenomena. The OCHEP Grid computing facility consists of a large computer cluster which is playing a major role in data analysis and Monte Carlo productions for both the D0 and ATLAS experiments. Theoretical efforts are devoted to new ideas in Higgs bosons physics, extra dimensions, neutrino masses and oscillations, Grand Unified Theories, supersymmetric models, dark matter, and nonperturbative quantum field theory. Theory members are making major contributions to the understanding of phenomena being explored at the Tevatron and the LHC. They have proposed new models for Higgs bosons, and have suggested new signals for extra dimensions, and for the search of supersymmetric particles. During the seven year period when OCHEP was partially funded through the DOE EPSCoR implementation grant, OCHEP members published over 500 refereed journal articles and made over 200 invited presentations at major conferences. The Center is also involved in education and outreach activities by offering summer research programs for high school teachers and college students, and organizing summer workshops for high school teachers, sometimes coordinating with the Quarknet programs at OSU and OU. The details of the Center can be found in http://ochep.phy.okstate.edu.

  20. Seismic Studies

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    R. Quittmeyer

    2006-09-25

    This technical work plan (TWP) describes the efforts to develop and confirm seismic ground motion inputs used for preclosure design and probabilistic safety 'analyses and to assess the postclosure performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. As part of the effort to develop seismic inputs, the TWP covers testing and analyses that provide the technical basis for inputs to the seismic ground-motion site-response model. The TWP also addresses preparation of a seismic methodology report for submission to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The activities discussed in this TWP are planned for fiscal years (FY) 2006 through 2008. Some of the work enhances the technical basis for previously developed seismic inputs and reduces uncertainties and conservatism used in previous analyses and modeling. These activities support the defense of a license application. Other activities provide new results that will support development of the preclosure, safety case; these results directly support and will be included in the license application. Table 1 indicates which activities support the license application and which support licensing defense. The activities are listed in Section 1.2; the methods and approaches used to implement them are discussed in more detail in Section 2.2. Technical and performance objectives of this work scope are: (1) For annual ground motion exceedance probabilities appropriate for preclosure design analyses, provide site-specific seismic design acceleration response spectra for a range of damping values; strain-compatible soil properties; peak motions, strains, and curvatures as a function of depth; and time histories (acceleration, velocity, and displacement). Provide seismic design inputs for the waste emplacement level and for surface sites. Results should be consistent with the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) for Yucca Mountain and reflect, as appropriate, available knowledge on the limits to extreme ground motion at Yucca Mountain. (2) For probabilistic analyses supporting the demonstration of compliance with preclosure performance objectives, provide a mean seismic hazard curve for the surface facilities area. Results should be consistent with the PSHA for Yucca Mountain and reflect, as appropriate, available knowledge on the limits to extreme ground motion at Yucca Mountain. (3) For annual ground motion exceedance probabilities appropriate for postclosure analyses, provide site-specific seismic time histories (acceleration, velocity, and displacement) for the waste emplacement level. Time histories should be consistent with the PSHA and reflect available knowledge on the limits to extreme ground motion at Yucca Mountain. (4) In support of ground-motion site-response modeling, perform field investigations and laboratory testing to provide a technical basis for model inputs. Characterize the repository block and areas in which important-to-safety surface facilities will be sited. Work should support characterization and reduction of uncertainties in inputs to ground-motion site-response modeling. (5) On the basis of rock mechanics, geologic, and seismic information, determine limits on extreme ground motion at Yucca Mountain and document the technical basis for them. (6) Update the ground-motion site-response model, as appropriate, on the basis of new data. Expand and enhance the technical basis for model validation to further increase confidence in the site-response modeling. (7) Document seismic methodologies and approaches in reports to be submitted to the NRC. (8) Address condition reports.

  1. One West Third Street Tulsa Oklahoma

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Jason Gray Accountant Tulsa, Oklahoma Special thanks to: Tony Cochran Dallas Cooper Jerry Ferguson Ruben Garcia Bethel Herrold William Hiller Jimmy Isaacs Danny Johnson Darlene Low Ken McGuire Beth Nielsen Rutha Williams and Pete Hentschel, USACE-KCD Andrew Lachowsky, AECC U P D AT E S O U T H W E S T E R N P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N O C T O B E R - D E C E M B E R 2 0 0 5 Southwestern Coordinates Efforts to Restore Power After Hurricane Rita The efforts of the Southwestern Power

  2. One West Third Street Tulsa, Oklahoma

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Jane Thomas Supply Technician Tulsa, Oklahoma Special thanks to: SWPA Marshall Boyken Kenny Broadaway Mike Dawson Scott Holland Beth Nielsen Margaret Skidmore Randy Staponski Gary Swartzlander Ron Szatmary Steve Wall Jon Worthington CNI/Bearskin Ashley Butler Vicki Clarke Ruben Garcia William Hiller Kathy O'Neal KC District Corps George Boban Andre Vasseur Tulsa District Corps Dan Brueggenjohann Little Rock District Corps Lee Beverly U P DAT E S O U T H W E S T E R N P O W E R A D M I N I S T R

  3. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Volume (MMcf)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Volume (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Volume (MMcf)",1,"Monthly","12/2015" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","n5030ok2m.xls"

  4. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Gas Underground Storage Withdrawals (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Withdrawals (MMcf)",1,"Monthly","12/2015" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  5. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Consumption by End Use"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Consumption by End Use" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Consumption by End Use",6,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1989" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  6. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1989" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  7. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)",1,"Monthly","12/2015" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  8. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (MMcf)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Capacity (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (MMcf)",1,"Monthly","12/2015" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","n5290ok2m.xls"

  9. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption (MMcf)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Vehicle Fuel Consumption (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption (MMcf)",1,"Monthly","12/2015" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  10. Enhanced Oil Recovery with Downhole Vibrations Stimulation in Osage County, Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    J. Ford Brett; Robert V. Westermark

    2001-09-30

    This Technical Quarterly Report is for the reporting period July 1, 2001 to September 30, 2001. The report provides details of the work done on the project entitled ''Enhanced Oil Recovery with Downhole Vibration Stimulation in Osage County Oklahoma''. The project is divided into nine separate tasks. Several of the tasks are being worked on simultaneously, while other tasks are dependent on earlier tasks being completed. The vibration stimulation well is permitted as Well 111-W-27, section 8 T26N R6E Osage County Oklahoma. It was spud July 28, 2001 with Goober Drilling Rig No. 3. The well was drilled to 3090-feet cored, logged, cased and cemented. The Rig No.3 moved off August 6, 2001. Phillips Petroleum Co. has begun analyzing the cores recovered from the test well. Standard porosity, permeability and saturation measurements will be conducted. They will then begin the sonic stimulation core tests Calumet Oil Company, the operator of the NBU, has begun to collect both production and injection wells information to establish a baseline for the project in the pilot field test area. Green Country Submersible Pump Company, a subsidiary of Calumet Oil Company, will provide both the surface equipment and downhole tools to allow the Downhole Vibration Tool to be operated by a surface rod rotating system. The 7-inch Downhole Vibration Tool (DHVT) has been built and is ready for initial shallow testing. The shallow testing will be done in a temporarily abandoned well operated by Calumet Oil Co. in the Wynona waterflood unit. The data acquisition doghouse and rod rotating equipment have been placed on location in anticipation of the shallow test in Well No.20-12 Wynona Waterflood Unit. A notice of invention disclosure was submitted to the DOE Chicago Operations Office. DOE Case No.S-98,124 has been assigned to follow the documentation following the invention disclosure. A paper covering the material presented to the Oklahoma Geologic Survey (OGS)/DOE Annual Workshop in Oklahoma City May 8,9 2001 has been submitted for publication to the OGS. A technical paper draft has been submitted for the ASME/ETCE conference (Feb 2002) Production Technology Symposium. A one-day SPE sponsored short course which is planned to cover seismic stimulation efforts around the world, will be offered at the SPE/DOE Thirteenth Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery in Tulsa, OK, April 13-17, 2002. Dan Maloney, Phillips and Bob Westermark, OGCI will be the instructors. In addition, a proposed technical paper has been submitted for this meeting.

  11. REO Monthly

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    2010-12-31

    A spreadsheet written in Microsoft Excel that evaluates combinations of renewable energy technologies at a site and identifies the combination that minimizes life cycle cost. Constraints on the optimization such as percent of energy from renewable, available land area; available investment capital, etc make the optimization more useful. Inputs to the model include building location, number of square feet and floors; monthly energy use and cost for electric and any other fuels. Outputs include sizemore » of each RE technology total investment, utility costs, O&M costs; percent renewable; life cycle cost; rate of return; CO2 savings.« less

  12. Petroleum Supply Monthly

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    9,382 12,603 46,492 2,249 23,789 94,515 Tank Farms and Pipelines (Includes Cushing, OK) .... 976 78,122 103,981 12,086 22,697 217,862 Cushing, Oklahoma ......

  13. Harper County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Harper County is a county in Oklahoma. Its FIPS County Code is 059. It is classified as...

  14. City of Newkirk, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: 580 362-2117 or 580 362-2155 Website: newkirkchamber.comhtmlUtilit Outage Hotline: 580 362-2117 References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File for...

  15. City of Mooreland, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Informatio...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Oklahoma Phone Number: 580-994-5924 or 580-994-5925 Website: www.moorelandok.comindex.html Outage Hotline: 580-994-5924 or 580-994-5925 References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data...

  16. Logan County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Logan County is a county in Oklahoma. Its FIPS County Code is 083. It is classified as...

  17. Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority- WISE Energy Efficiency Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (OMPA) offers rebates on a variety of HVAC equipment through its WISE Rebate program. This program encourages residential customers and builders to upgrade to...

  18. City of Stroud, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Stroud Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: (918) 968-2571 Website: cityofstroud.comindex.aspx?ni Outage Hotline: (918) 968-2571 or After Hours (918) 968-2733 References: EIA Form...

  19. Water Law and Management in Oklahoma | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Water Law and Management in OklahomaPermittingRegulatory GuidanceGuideHandbook Abstract...

  20. City of Pawhuska, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search Name: City of Pawhuska Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: 918-287-2751 Website: ok-pawhuska.civiccities.comin Outage Hotline: After Hours 918-287-3260 References: EIA...

  1. GE funds initiative to support STEM initiatives in Oklahoma ...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    STEM Empowers OK: Initiative to enrich STEM education in Oklahoma Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window) Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share...

  2. Category:Oklahoma City, OK | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    OK Jump to: navigation, search Go Back to PV Economics By Location Media in category "Oklahoma City, OK" The following 16 files are in this category, out of 16 total....

  3. City of Purcell, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Name: Purcell City of Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: (405) 527-6561 Website: www.purcell.ok.govindex.aspx? Twitter: @CityOfPurcellOK Facebook: https:www.facebook.com...

  4. City of Cordell, Oklahoma (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search Name: City of Cordell Place: Oklahoma Phone Number: 580-832-3825 Website: cordell-ok.comcity.html Outage Hotline: 580-832-3825 References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final Data File...

  5. Murray County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Murray County is a county in Oklahoma. Its FIPS County Code is 099. It is classified as...

  6. Jackson County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Jackson County is a county in Oklahoma. Its FIPS County Code is 065. It is classified as...

  7. Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Kansas...

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Kansas (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Kansas (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

  8. West Peavine, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. West Peavine is a census-designated place in Adair County, Oklahoma.1 References US...

  9. Oklahoma Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Base Gas) (Million...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Base Gas) (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Base Gas) (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 167,385 163,458...

  10. Oklahoma Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Working Gas) (Million...

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Working Gas) (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Working Gas) (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 129,245...

  11. 2009 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study- Oklahoma City Workshop

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    On June 18, 2008, DOE hosted a regional pre-study workshop in Oklahoma City, OK to receive input and suggestions concerning the 2009 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. The agenda,...

  12. Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority- WISE Energy Efficiency Loan Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (OMPA) offers loans for a variety of measures and equipment through its "Ways I Save Electricity" (WISE) Loan Program. This program encourages residential and...

  13. Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells ...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Gas and Gas Condensate Wells (Number of Elements) Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5...

  14. Tri-County Electric Coop, Inc (Oklahoma) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Logo: Tri-County Electric Coop, Inc Name: Tri-County Electric Coop, Inc Address: PO Box 880 302 East Glaydas Place: Hooker, Oklahoma Zip: 73945 Product: Distribution Electric...

  15. Oklahoma Natural Gas Repressuring (Million Cubic Feet)

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Repressuring (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Repressuring (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 81,755 86,285 87,196 1970's 86,432 85,027 82,265 82,396 83,488 83,486 85,479 89,365 91,342 96,366 1980's 101,198 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date:

  16. Oklahoma Natural Gas Repressuring (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Repressuring (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Repressuring (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 81,755 86,285 87,196 1970's 86,432 85,027 82,265 82,396 83,488 83,486 85,479 89,365 91,342 96,366 1980's 101,198 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date:

  17. Oklahoma Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    Office of Science (SC) Website

    Oklahoma Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School High School Students High School Coaches High School Regionals High School Rules, Forms, and Resources Middle School Attending National Event Volunteers 2015 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: Email Us High School Regionals Oklahoma Regions Print Text Size:

  18. Oklahoma Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    Office of Science (SC) Website

    Oklahoma Regions National Science Bowl® (NSB) NSB Home About High School Middle School Middle School Students Middle School Coaches Middle School Regionals Middle School Rules, Forms, and Resources Attending National Event Volunteers 2015 Competition Results News Media WDTS Home Contact Information National Science Bowl® U.S. Department of Energy SC-27/ Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: 202-586-6702 E: Email Us Middle School Regionals Oklahoma Regions Print

  19. Oklahoma - Seds - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Oklahoma - Seds - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) The page does not exist for . To view this page, please select a state: United States Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma

  20. Reducing Peak Demand to Defer Power Plant Construction in Oklahoma

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Reducing Peak Demand to Defer Power Plant Construction in Oklahoma Located in the heart of "Tornado Alley," Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company's (OG&E) electric grid faces significant challenges from severe weather, hot summers, and about 2% annual load growth. To better control costs and manage electric reliability under these conditions, OG&E is pursuing demand response strategies made possible by implementation of smart grid technologies, tools, and techniques from

  1. Seismic sources

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Green, M.A.; Cook, N.G.W.; McEvilly, T.V.; Majer, E.L.; Witherspoon, P.A.

    1987-04-20

    Apparatus is described for placement in a borehole in the earth, which enables the generation of closely controlled seismic waves from the borehole. Pure torsional shear waves are generated by an apparatus which includes a stator element fixed to the borehole walls and a rotor element which is electrically driven to rapidly oscillate on the stator element to cause reaction forces transmitted through the borehole walls to the surrounding earth. Longitudinal shear waves are generated by an armature that is driven to rapidly oscillate along the axis of the borehole, to cause reaction forces transmitted to the surrounding earth. Pressure waves are generated by electrically driving pistons that press against opposite ends of a hydraulic reservoir that fills the borehole. High power is generated by energizing the elements for more than about one minute. 9 figs.

  2. Oklahoma Natural Gas in Underground Storage - Change in Working Gas from

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Same Month Previous Year (Million Cubic Feet) Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas in Underground Storage - Change in Working Gas from Same Month Previous Year (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 -3,932 5,480 7,289 -2,690 234 1,959 -4,575 -3,502 -6,399 723 4,670 1991 -18,020 -11,848 -7,774 9,453 9,540 10,851 1,058 -1,981 846 -1,053 -36,391 -20,972 1992 4,433 1,077 -7,840 -16,283 -22,923 -22,043 -5,431 -2,118 584 4,227 9,780 -10,318 1993 -69,197

  3. Petroleum Supply Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Report," EIA-813, "Monthly Crude Oil Report," EIA-815, "Monthly Bulk Terminal and Blender Report," EIA-816, "Monthly Natural Gas Liquids Report," and EIA-819, "Monthly ...

  4. Megaregional seismic approach to new play concept development

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bertagne, A.J.; Vuillermoz, C.; Maxwell, R.A.

    1989-03-01

    A megaregional seismic line is a continuous line that traverses more than one basin. After such a line is interpreted using well control, surface geology, and other available data, it serves as a concise expression of our understanding of the geology along a transect and provides a starting point for developing new play concepts. Megaregional seismic lines aid in the development of exploration concepts by providing new insights into (1) what is and is not basement, (2) maturation history and migration pathways, (3) regional structural geology, and (4) regional stratigraphy. An ongoing project to prepare a series of interpreted transcontinental megaregional seismic lines uses a segment that starts in the Arkoma basin of Oklahoma, traverses the Ouachita thrust belt, and terminates at the northern Texas Gulf coastal plain. This segment shows that several potential plays exist, both structural and stratigraphic, between areas of current exploration activity. Regional seismic lines from the Sacramento Valley and the Illinois basin further illustrate how interpretation of long seismic lines can lead to new exploration ideas.

  5. Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma's Assessment of Wind Resources on Tribal Land

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Oklahoma's Assessment of Wind Resources on Tribal Land DOE's Tribal Energy Program Review March 24-27, 2014 - Denver, CO Overview  Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma  Iowa Tribe Long Term Energy Vision  Historical Renewable Energy Timeline  Project Objectives  Wind Study Reports  New Location Update  Changes and Challenges  Next Steps and Final Report Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma  Tribal enrollment is over 780  Organized under the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act, which authorized the

  6. Oklahoma Natural Gas Processed (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Processed (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Processed (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 1,038,103 1,122,692 1,167,150 1970's 1,183,273 1,123,614 1,116,872 1,175,548 1,092,487 1,033,003 1,072,992 1,057,326 1,069,293 1980's 1,063,256 1,112,740 1,023,057 1,118,403 1,137,463 1,103,062 1,127,780 1,301,673 1,145,688 1990's 1,102,301 1,100,812 1,071,426 1,082,452 1,092,734 1,015,965 1,054,123 1,014,008 947,177 892,396 2000's

  7. Seismic sources

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Green, Michael A. (Oakland, CA); Cook, Neville G. W. (Lafayette, CA); McEvilly, Thomas V. (Berkeley, CA); Majer, Ernest L. (El Cirrito, CA); Witherspoon, Paul A. (Berkeley, CA)

    1992-01-01

    Apparatus is described for placement in a borehole in the earth, which enables the generation of closely controlled seismic waves from the borehole. Pure torsional shear waves are generated by an apparatus which includes a stator element fixed to the borehole walls and a rotor element which is electrically driven to rapidly oscillate on the stator element to cause reaction forces transmitted through the borehole walls to the surrounding earth. Logitudinal shear waves are generated by an armature that is driven to rapidly oscillate along the axis of the borehole relative to a stator that is clamped to the borehole, to cause reaction forces transmitted to the surrounding earth. Pressure waves are generated by electrically driving pistons that press against opposite ends of a hydraulic reservoir that fills the borehole. High power is generated by energizing the elements at a power level that causes heating to over 150.degree. C. within one minute of operation, but energizing the elements for no more than about one minute.

  8. ,"Oklahoma Heat Content of Natural Gas Consumed"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Natural Gas Consumed",1,"Monthly","122015","01152013" ,"Release Date:","02292016" ,"Next Release Date:","03312016" ,"Excel File Name:","ngconsheatdcusokm.xls" ...

  9. Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Texas (Million

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Cubic Feet) Texas (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Texas (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 2,434 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016 Referring Pages: NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Oklahoma-Texas

  10. Oklahoma Natural Gas Processed in Kansas (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Kansas (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Processed in Kansas (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 8,527 9,029 8,794 8,481 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Processed Oklahoma-Kansas

  11. Oklahoma Natural Gas Processed in Texas (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Texas (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Processed in Texas (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 16,462 18,595 18,455 17,361 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Processed Oklahoma-Texas

  12. Oklahoma Community-Scale Tribal Renewable Energy Workshop | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Oklahoma Community-Scale Tribal Renewable Energy Workshop Oklahoma Community-Scale Tribal Renewable Energy Workshop June 9, 2015 8:00AM CDT to June 11, 2015 5:00PM CDT Norman, OK Riverwind Hotel and Casino 1544 OK-9 Norman, OK 73072 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Indian Energy, with support from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), is offering a series of interactive workshops that will walk participants through the process for developing community-scale

  13. Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1,243 480 767 1,598 511 539 821 1,545 395 600 2010's 219 2,995 1,133 733 1,088 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Sales Oklahoma Dry Natural

  14. Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 568 684 1,265 511 338 2010's 325 274 439 440 602 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Oklahoma

  15. Seismic Monitoring - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    and Resource Protection Home Cultural Resource Program and Curation Services Ecological Monitoring Environmental Surveillance Meteorology and Climatology Services Seismic...

  16. Petroleum Supply Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA) Forms EIA-810, "Monthly Refinery Report," EIA-815, "Monthly Bulk Terminal and Blender Report," EIA-816, "Monthly Natural Gas ...

  17. Assessing Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events and Implications on Seismic

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Risk | Department of Energy Assessing Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events and Implications on Seismic Risk Assessing Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events and Implications on Seismic Risk September 19, 2012 Presenter: Jeffrey Kimball, Technical Specialist (Seismologist) Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Topics Covered: Department of Energy Approach to Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design (Seismic) Design Basis and Beyond Design Basis Seismic Events Seismic Risk Implications - Key

  18. Petroleum Supply Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    6 December 2015 Table 35. Percent Yield of Petroleum Products by PAD and Refining Districts, December 2015 Commodity PAD District 1 - East Coast PAD District 2 - Midwest East Coast Appalachian No. 1 Total Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky Minnesota, Wisconsin, North and South Dakota Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri Total Liquefied Refinery Gases ......................................... 1.5 -1.8 1.2 1.7 -1.9 -0.9 0.6 Finished Motor Gasoline 1 ......................................... 50.7 38.5 49.8 54.8

  19. Field Evaluation of a Near Zero Energy Home in Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hendron, R.; Hancock, E.; Barker, G.; Reeves, P.

    2008-08-01

    The authors evaluated a zero energy home built by Ideal Homes in Edmond, Oklahoma, that included an extensive package of energy-efficient technologies and a photovoltaic array for site electricity generation. The home was part of a Building America research project in partnership with the Building Science Consortium to exhibit high efficiency technologies while keeping costs within the reach of average home buyers.

  20. University of Oklahoma - High Energy Physics

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Skubic, Patrick L.

    2013-07-31

    The High Energy Physics program at the University of Oklahoma, Pat Skubic, Principal Investigator, is attempting to understand nature at the deepest level using the most advanced experimental and theoretical tools. The four experimental faculty, Brad Abbott, Phil Gutierrez, Pat Skubic, and Mike Strauss, together with post-doctoral associates and graduate students, are finishing their work as part of the D0 collaboration at Fermilab, and increasingly focusing their investigations at the Large Hadron Collidor (LHC) as part of the ATLAS Collaboration. Work at the LHC has become even more exciting with the recent discovery by ATLAS and the other collaboration, CMS, of the long-sought Higgs boson, which plays a key role in generating masses for the elementary constituents of matter. Work of the OUHEP group has been in the three areas of hardware, software, and analysis. Now that the Higgs boson has been discovered, completing the Standard Model of fundamental physics, new efforts will focus on finding hints of physics beyond the standard model, such as supersymmetry. The OUHEP theory group (Kim Milton, PI) also consists of four faculty members, Howie Baer, Chung Kao, Kim Milton, and Yun Wang, and associated students and postdocs. They are involved in understanding fundamental issues in formulating theories of the microworld, and in proposing models that carry us past the Standard Model, which is an incomplete description of nature. They therefore work in close concert with their experimental colleagues. One also can study fundamental physics by looking at the large scale structure of the universe; in particular the ``dark energy'' that seems to be causing the universe to expand at an accelerating rate, effectively makes up about 3/4 of the energy in the universe, and yet is totally unidentified. Dark energy and dark matter, which together account for nearly all of the energy in the universe, are an important probe of fundamental physics at the very shortest distances, or at the very highest energies. The outcomes of the group's combined experimental and theoretical research will be an improved understanding of nature, at the highest energies reachable, from which applications to technological innovation will surely result, as they always have from such studies in the past.

  1. Seismicity Protocol | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Seismicity Protocol Seismicity Protocol Project objectives: Develop an updated protocol/best engineering practices to address public and industry issues associated with induced seismicity. PDF icon seismic_majer_induced_protocol.pdf More Documents & Publications Development of an Updated Induced Seismicity Protocol for the Application of Microearthquake (MEQ) Monitoring for Characterizing Enhanced Geothermal Systems; 2010 Geothermal Technology Program Peer Review Report Microearthquake

  2. Seismic Imaging and Monitoring

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Huang, Lianjie

    2012-07-09

    I give an overview of LANL's capability in seismic imaging and monitoring. I present some seismic imaging and monitoring results, including imaging of complex structures, subsalt imaging of Gulf of Mexico, fault/fracture zone imaging for geothermal exploration at the Jemez pueblo, time-lapse imaging of a walkway vertical seismic profiling data for monitoring CO{sub 2} inject at SACROC, and microseismic event locations for monitoring CO{sub 2} injection at Aneth. These examples demonstrate LANL's high-resolution and high-fidelity seismic imaging and monitoring capabilities.

  3. Silicon Valley Power and Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority Win 2014 Public

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Power Wind Awards | Department of Energy Silicon Valley Power and Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority Win 2014 Public Power Wind Awards Silicon Valley Power and Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority Win 2014 Public Power Wind Awards June 17, 2014 - 8:17am Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy, together with the American Public Power Association (APPA), today recognized the Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (OMPA) and Silicon Valley Power (SVP) of Santa Clara, California, as the winners of the

  4. USING MICRO-SEISMICITY AND SEISMIC VELOCITIES TO MAP SUBSURFACE...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    some cases, although a significant portion of seismicity remains diffuse and does not cluster into sharply defined structures. The seismic velocity structure reveals heterogeneous...

  5. Using Micro-Seismicity and Seismic Velocities to Map Subsurface...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    some cases, although a significant portion of seismicity remains diffuse and does not cluster into sharply defined structures. The seismic velocity structure reveals heterogeneous...

  6. Teleseismic-Seismic Monitoring At Central Nevada Seismic Zone...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Teleseismic-Seismic Monitoring At Central Nevada Seismic Zone Region (Biasi, Et Al., 2008) Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Exploration Activity:...

  7. National Women's History Month

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NATIONAL WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH is an annual declared month that highlights the contributions of women to events in history and contemporary society.

  8. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly board meeting is open to the public. This month, participants will receive an updateon the U-233 Project.

  9. ORSSAB Monthly Board Meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The ORSSAB MonthlyBoard meeting is open to the public. This month, participants will be briefed on the East Tennessee Technology Park Zone 1 Soils Proposed Plan.

  10. Monthly Energy Statistics

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: July 28, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  11. Petroleum Supply Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Domestic crude oil field production are estimates. Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA) Forms EIA-22M "Monthly Biodiesel Production Survey", Forms EIA-810, "Monthly ...

  12. Petroleum Supply Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Domestic crude oil field production are estimates. Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA) Forms EIA-22M "Monthly Biodiesel Production Survey", EIA-810, "Monthly Refinery ...

  13. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Values shown for previous months are revised. Data through 2014 are fi nal. Totals may not ... U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 27 March 2016

  14. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Values shown for previous months may be revised. Data through 2014 are fi nal. Sources: - ... Sales Report." U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 90

  15. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Values shown for previous months may be revised. Data through 2014 are fi nal. Sources: ... Report." U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 6 March 2016

  16. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Values shown for previous months may be revised. Data through 2014 are fi nal. Sources: ... U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 10 March 2016

  17. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Values shown for previous months are revised. Data through 2014 are fi nal. Totals may not ... U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 12 March 2016

  18. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Values shown for previous months may be revised. Data through 2014 are fi nal. Sources: ... U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 39 March 2016

  19. Exploitation and Optimization of Reservoir Performance in Hunton Formation, Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mohan Kelkar

    2007-06-30

    Hunton formation in Oklahoma has been the subject of attention for the last ten years. The new interest started with the drilling of the West Carney field in 1995 in Lincoln County. Subsequently, many other operators have expanded the search for oil and gas in Hunton formation in other parts of Oklahoma. These fields exhibit many unique production characteristics, including: (1) decreasing water-oil or water-gas ratio over time; (2) decreasing gas-oil ratio followed by an increase; (3) poor prediction capability of the reserves based on the log data; and (4) low geological connectivity but high hydrodynamic connectivity. The purpose of this investigation is to understand the principal mechanisms affecting the production, and propose methods by which we can optimize the production from fields with similar characteristics.

  20. Anisotropy in Broken Cloud Fields Over Oklahoma from Ladsat Data

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Anisotropy in Broken Cloud Fields Over Oklahoma from Landsat Data L. M. Hinkelman National Institute of Aerospace Hampton, Virginia K. F. Evans University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado Introduction Previously, it was shown (Hinkelman et al. 2002) that anisotropy, or the existence of a preferred direction, in cumulus fields significantly affects solar radiative transfer through these fields. In this poster, we investigate the occurrence of anisotropy in broken cloud fields near the Atmospheric

  1. FE0003537_UofOklahoma | netl.doe.gov

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Next Generation Surfactants for Improved Chemical Flooding Technology Last Reviewed 12/15/2012 DE-FE0003537 Goal The principle objective of the project is to characterize and test current and next generation high performance surfactants for improved chemical flooding technology, focusing on reservoirs in Pennsylvanian age (Penn) sands. Performer Oklahoma University Enhanced Oil Recovery Design Center, Norman, OK Background Primary and secondary methods have produced approximately one-third of

  2. Enhanced Oil Recovery with Downhole Vibration Stimulation in Osage County, Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    J. Ford Brett; Robert V. Westermark

    2001-12-31

    This Technical Quarterly Report is for the reporting period September 30, 2001 to December 31, 2001. The report provides details of the work done on the project entitled ''Enhanced Oil Recovery with Downhole Vibration Stimulation in Osage County Oklahoma''. The project is divided into nine separate tasks. Several of the tasks are being worked on simultaneously, while other tasks are dependent on earlier tasks being completed. The vibration stimulation well was permitted as Well 111-W-27, section 8 T26N R6E Osage County Oklahoma. It was spud July 28, 2001 with Goober Drilling Rig No. 3. The well was drilled to 3090-feet cored, logged, cased and cemented. The Rig No.3 moved off August 6, 2001. Phillips Petroleum Co. has performed standard core analysis on the cores recovered from the test well. Standard porosity, permeability and saturation measurements have been conducted. Phillips has begun the sonic stimulation core tests. Calumet Oil Company, the operator of the NBU, has been to collecting both production and injection wells information to establish a baseline for the project in the pilot field test area since May 2001. The 7-inch Downhole Vibration Tool (DHVT) has been built and has been run in a shallow well for initial power source testing. This testing was done in a temporarily abandoned well, Wynona Waterflood Unit, Well No.20-12 operated by Calumet Oil Co both in October and December 2001. The data acquisition system, and rod rotating equipment performed as designed. However, the DHVT experienced two internal failures during vibration operations. The DHVT has been repaired with modifications to improve its functionality. A proposed technical paper abstract has been accepted by the SPE to be presented at the 2002 SPE/DOE Thirteenth Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, in Tulsa OK, 13-17 April 2002. A one-day SPE sponsored short course which is planned to cover seismic stimulation efforts around the world, will be offered at the SPE/DOE Thirteenth Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery in Tulsa, OK, April 13-17, 2002. Dan Maloney, Phillips and Bob Westermark, OGCI will be the instructors.

  3. Field trip guide to selected outcrops, Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1991-11-17

    The Arbuckle Mountains, named for Brigadier General Matthew Arbuckle, are located in south-central Oklahoma. The formations that comprise the Arbuckle Mountains have been extensively studied for hydrocarbon source rock and reservoir rock characteristics that can be applied to the subsurface in the adjacent Anadarko and Ardmore basins. Numerous reports and guidebooks have been written concerning the Arbuckle Mountains. A few important general publications are provided in the list of selected references. The purpose of this handout is to provide general information on the geology of the Arbuckle Mountains and specific information on the four field trip stops, adapted from the literature. The four stops were at: (1) Sooner Rock and Sand Quarry; (2) Woodford Shale; (3) Hunton Anticline and Hunton Quarry; and (4) Tar Sands of Sulfur Area. As part of this report, two papers are included for more detail: Paleomagnetic dating of basinal fluid migration, base-metal mineralization, and hydrocarbon maturation in the Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma and Laminated black shale-bedded chert cyclicity in the Woodford Formation, southern Oklahoma.

  4. Jobs, tax revenue persuade Oklahoma to waive buyback rule

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hines, V.

    1985-10-28

    The chance to add up to 900 new jobs and $54 million in tax revenues led Oklahoma regulators to agree to a one-time waiver of a controversial state ruling that discourages long-term buyback rates for cogenerators. The ruling will allow a 100 MW cogeneration project to proceed with its plan to sell steam to the Firestone tire plant and electricity to the local utility. Economic forecasts show that the deal will give the Oklahoma facility the lowest operating cost for any Firestone plant in the country. It will also make Oklahoma more attractive to new businesses and industry. Regulators emphasize that the waiver of rule 58-H applies only to this project, with future proposals to be judged on their own merits. Despite its large gas surplus, the state has virtually no cogeneration, which requires a steady, low-cost fuel supply, an expanding requirement for electricity, and the presence of large industrial steam users. Other issues the commission considered were the capacity and energy buyback rates.

  5. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Crude oil prices U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 3 March 2016

  6. Oklahoma Natural Gas in Underground Storage - Change in Working Gas from

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Same Month Previous Year (Percent) Percent) Oklahoma Natural Gas in Underground Storage - Change in Working Gas from Same Month Previous Year (Percent) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 -13.9 -10.0 -6.5 8.1 7.3 7.8 0.7 -1.3 0.5 -0.6 -20.1 -13.6 1992 4.0 1.0 -7.0 -12.9 -16.3 -14.6 -3.6 -1.4 0.4 2.5 6.8 -7.7 1993 -59.8 -75.3 -81.3 -71.8 -58.1 -47.8 -43.7 -38.0 -33.1 -31.7 -34.3 -29.9 1994 20.6 33.2 68.7 60.2 49.2 29.1 25.2 21.3 11.9 8.6 24.6 27.3 1995 54.1 106.0 91.5

  7. Selenium in Oklahoma ground water and soil. Quarterly report No. 6

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Atalay, A.; Vir Maggon, D.

    1991-03-30

    Selenium with a consumption of 2 liters per day (5). The objectives of this study are: (1) to determine the concentrations of Se in Oklahoma ground water and soil samples. (2) to map the geographical distribution of Se species in Oklahoma. (3) to relate groundwater depth, pH and geology with concentration of Se.

  8. Seismicity and Reservoir Fracture Characterization

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Below are the project presentations and respective peer review results for Seismicity and Reservoir Fracture Characterization.

  9. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly meeting is open to the public. This month, participants will receive an update and breifing about the FY 2018 Budget Formulation and Prioritization of Projects from the Oak Ridge...

  10. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly meetingis open to the public. This month the board will hear a presentation and discussthe FY 2016Oak Ridge Officeof Environmental Management's budget and prioritization.

  11. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly meeting is open to the public. This month, participants will receive an update and breifing about the Groundwater Monitoring Program from the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental...

  12. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly meeting is open to the public. This month, participants will receive an update and breifing about the EM Disposal Facility from the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Managment.

  13. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... Values shown for previous months are revised. Data through 2014 are fi nal. Totals may not ... Report." U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 8 March 2016

  14. Electric Power Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Electric Power Monthly > Electric Power Monthly Back Issues Electric Power Monthly Back Issues Monthly Excel files zipped 2010 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2009 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2008 January February March March Supplement April May June July August September October November December 2007 January February March April May June July August September October November

  15. National LGBT Pride Month

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month (LGBT Pride Month) is currently celebrated each year in the month of June to honor the 1969 Stonewall riots in Manhattan. The Stonewall riots were a tipping point for the Gay Liberation Movement in the United States.

  16. Seismicity Protocol | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Seismicity Protocol Seismicity Protocol Project objectives: Develop an updated protocol/best engineering practices to address public and industry issues associated with induced seismicity. PDF icon seismic_majer_induced_protocol.pdf More Documents & Publications Development of an Updated Induced Seismicity Protocol for the Application of Microearthquake (MEQ) Monitoring for Characterizing Enhanced Geothermal Systems; 2010 Geothermal Technology Program Peer Review Report Monitoring the Effect

  17. Method of migrating seismic records

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Ober, Curtis C.; Romero, Louis A.; Ghiglia, Dennis C.

    2000-01-01

    The present invention provides a method of migrating seismic records that retains the information in the seismic records and allows migration with significant reductions in computing cost. The present invention comprises phase encoding seismic records and combining the encoded seismic records before migration. Phase encoding can minimize the effect of unwanted cross terms while still allowing significant reductions in the cost to migrate a number of seismic records.

  18. Deepwater seismic acquisition technology

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Caldwell, J.

    1996-09-01

    Although truly new technology is not required for successful acquisition of seismic data in deep Gulf of Mexico waters, it is helpful to review some basic aspects of these seismic surveys. Additionally, such surveys are likely to see early use of some emerging new technology which can improve data quality. Because such items as depth imaging, borehole seismic, 4-D and marine 3-component recording were mentioned in the May 1996 issue of World Oil, they are not discussed again here. However, these technologies will also play some role in the deepwater seismic activities. What is covered in this paper are some new considerations for: (1) longer data records needed in deeper water, (2) some pros and cons of very long steamer use, and (3) two new commercial systems for quantifying data quality.

  19. Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves Based Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    (Million Barrels) Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels) Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 8 1980's 8 9 10 10 11 11 12 11 11 11 1990's 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 9 2000's 8 9 11 11 11 13 14 15 17 17 2010's 19 21 24 30 35 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date:

  20. Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 583 1980's 604 631 745 829 769 826 857 781 765 654 1990's 657 628 629 643 652 674 684 685 698 749 2000's 734 694 695 686 790 839 892 949 1,034 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date:

  1. Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Based Production (Million

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Barrels) Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels) Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 59 1980's 62 65 67 70 75 77 76 76 79 73 1990's 75 76 77 77 76 70 74 71 69 70 2000's 69 66 61 59 64 65 67 69 74 77 2010's 82 88 96 99 117 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date:

  2. Exploitation and Optimization of Reservoir Performance in Hunton Formation, Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kelkar, Mohan

    2001-05-08

    This report presents the work done so far on Hunton Formation in West Carney Field in Lincoln County, Oklahoma. West Carney Field produces oil and gas from the Hunton Formation. The field was developed starting in 1995. Some of the unique characteristics of the field include decreasing water oil and ratio over time, decreasing gas-oil ratio at the beginning of production, inability to calculate oil reserves in the field based on long data, and sustained oil rates over long periods of time.

  3. Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1,325 671 845 1,864 763 728 1,202 1,567 599 387 2010's 1,519 2,459 975 738 1,210 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions

  4. Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 36 615 -138 1980's -1,099 1,017 891 -323 -337 -500 835 559 203 202 1990's 838 -451 -121 -94 374 -67 122 82 106 -1,233 2000's 424 196 904 226 -113 297 -149 13 99 984 2010's -394 -368 -686 -622 816 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company

  5. Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Feet) New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 181 155 197 1980's 168 412 376 53 53 94 14 11 26 91 1990's 50 10 0 25 0 23 30 2 4 0 2000's 20 13 14 6 8 1 0 6 21 0 2010's 51 47 44 2 135 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015

  6. Oklahoma Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Oklahoma Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 802 2010's 926 1,150 1,280 1,469 1,721 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, as of

  7. Oklahoma Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels) Oklahoma Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's NA NA 98 80 2000's 111 109 105 92 92 101 90 118 129 138 2010's 143 244 279 292 444 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Proved

  8. Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Barrels) Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Oklahoma Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 72 1980's 67 66 78 89 86 95 89 79 79 68 1990's 65 61 63 68 60 69 69 75 85 82 2000's 96 89 94 104 124 142 160 152 164 180 2010's 216 271 346 450 480 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual

  9. Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Barrels) Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels) Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 511 1980's 537 565 667 740 683 731 768 702 686 586 1990's 592 567 566 575 592 605 615 610 613 667 2000's 639 605 601 582 666 697 732 797 870 985 2010's 1,270 1,445 1,452 1,408 1,752 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid

  10. Category:Seismic Techniques | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Seismic Techniques Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Geothermalpower.jpg Looking for the Seismic Techniques page? For detailed information on Seismic...

  11. Hanford Sitewide Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    F - Seismicity Relocation Analyses Hanford Sitewide Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis 2014 F.1 Appendix F Seismicity Relocation Analyses Final Report: High-Resolution...

  12. Seismic Consequence Abstraction

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    M. Gross

    2004-10-25

    The primary purpose of this model report is to develop abstractions for the response of engineered barrier system (EBS) components to seismic hazards at a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, and to define the methodology for using these abstractions in a seismic scenario class for the Total System Performance Assessment - License Application (TSPA-LA). A secondary purpose of this model report is to provide information for criticality studies related to seismic hazards. The seismic hazards addressed herein are vibratory ground motion, fault displacement, and rockfall due to ground motion. The EBS components are the drip shield, the waste package, and the fuel cladding. The requirements for development of the abstractions and the associated algorithms for the seismic scenario class are defined in ''Technical Work Plan For: Regulatory Integration Modeling of Drift Degradation, Waste Package and Drip Shield Vibratory Motion and Seismic Consequences'' (BSC 2004 [DIRS 171520]). The development of these abstractions will provide a more complete representation of flow into and transport from the EBS under disruptive events. The results from this development will also address portions of integrated subissue ENG2, Mechanical Disruption of Engineered Barriers, including the acceptance criteria for this subissue defined in Section 2.2.1.3.2.3 of the ''Yucca Mountain Review Plan, Final Report'' (NRC 2003 [DIRS 163274]).

  13. Monthly progress report for April 1993

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-05-01

    Accomplishments for the month of April are described briefly for the following tasks: energy production research; fuels research; and supplemental government program. Energy production research includes: reservoir assessment and characterization; TORIS research support; development of improved microbial flooding methods; development of improved chemical flooding methods; development of improved alkaline flooding methods; mobility control and sweep improvement in chemical flooding; gas flood performance prediction improvement; mobility control, profile modification, and sweep improvement in gas flooding; three-phase relative permeability research; thermal processes for light oil recovery; thermal processes for heavy oil recovery; and imaging techniques applied to the study of fluids in porous media. Fuel research includes: development of analytical methodology for analysis of heavy crudes; and thermochemistry and thermophysical properties of organic nitrogen- and diheteratom-containing compounds. Supplemental government program includes: microbial-enhanced waterflooding field project; feasibility study of heavy oil recovery in the midcontinent region--Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri; surfactant-enhanced alkaline flooding field project; process- engineering property measurements on heavy petroleum components; development and application of petroleum production technologies; upgrade BPO crude oil data base; simulation analysis of steam-foam projects; DOE education initiative project; field application of foams for oil production symposium; technology transfer to independent producers; compilations and analysis of outcrop data from the Muddy and Almond Formations; implementation of oil and gas technology transfer initiative; and horizontal well production from fractured reservoirs.

  14. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Methodology and Documentation General The Electricity Monthly Update is prepared by the Electric Power Operations Team, Office of Electricity, Renewables and Uranium Statistics, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy. Data published in the Electricity Monthly Update are compiled from the following sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-826,"Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenues with State Distributions Report," U.S. Energy

  15. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Regional Wholesale Markets: December 2015 The United States has many regional wholesale electricity markets. Below we look at monthly and annual ranges of on-peak, daily wholesale prices at selected pricing locations and daily peak demand for selected electricity systems in the Nation. The range of daily prices and demand data is shown for the report month and for the year ending with the report month. Prices and demand are shown for six Regional Transmission Operator (RTO) markets: ISO New

  16. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5 Monthly Performance Report June 2013 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report JUN 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 45 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report JUN 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 45 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  17. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Monthly Performance Report August 2015 W. K. Johnson President U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report AUG 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 71 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report AUG 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 71 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  18. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3 Monthly Performance Report August 2011 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report Aug 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 23 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report Aug 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 23 iii CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  19. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7 Monthly Performance Report December 2011 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report Dec 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 27 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report Dec 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 27 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  20. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8 Monthly Performance Report January 2012 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report JAN 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 28 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report JAN 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 28 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  1. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4 Monthly Performance Report July 2012 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report JUL 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 34 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report JUL 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 34 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  2. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3 Monthly Performance Report June 2012 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report JUN 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 33 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report JUN 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 33 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  3. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Monthly Performance Report April 2012 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report APR 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 31 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report APR 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 31 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  4. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 Monthly Performance Report May 2012 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report MAY 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 32 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report MAY 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 32 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  5. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5 Monthly Performance Report October 2011 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report Oct 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 25 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report Oct 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 25 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  6. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3 Monthly Performance Report April 2013 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report APR 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 43 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report APR 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 43 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  7. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    39 Monthly Performance Report December 2012 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report DEC 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 39 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report DEC 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 39 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  8. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Monthly Performance Report February 2013 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report FEB 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 41 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report FEB 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 41 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  9. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    40 Monthly Performance Report January 2013 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report JAN 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 40 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report JAN 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 40 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  10. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4 Monthly Performance Report May 2013 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report MAY 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 44 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report MAY 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 44 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  11. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8 Monthly Performance Report November 2012 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report NOV 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 38 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report NOV 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 38 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  12. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7 Monthly Performance Report October 2012 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report OCT 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 37 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report OCT 2012 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 37 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  13. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8 Monthly Performance Report September 2013 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report SEP 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 48 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report SEP 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 48 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  14. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9 Monthly Performance Report August 2014 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report AUG 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 59 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report AUG 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 59 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  15. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Monthly Performance Report December 2013 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report DEC 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 51 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report DEC 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 51 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  16. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8 Monthly Performance Report July 2014 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report JUL 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 58 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report JUL 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 58 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  17. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7 Monthly Performance Report June 2014 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report JUN 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 57 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report JUN 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 57 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  18. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    0 Monthly Performance Report November 2013 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report NOV 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 50 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report NOV 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 50 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  19. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    60 Monthly Performance Report September 2014 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report SEP 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 60 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report SEP 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 60 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  20. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3 Monthly Performance Report December 2014 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report DEC 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 63 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report DEC 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 63 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  1. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9 Monthly Performance Report June 2015 W. K. Johnson President U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report JUN 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 69 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report JUN 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 69 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  2. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 Monthly Performance Report November 2014 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report NOV 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 62 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report NOV 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 62 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  3. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 Monthly Performance Report September 2015 W. K. Johnson President U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report SEP 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 72 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report SEP 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 72 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  4. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6 Monthly Performance Report January 2016 W. K. Johnson President U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report JAN 2016 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 76 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report JAN 2016 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 76 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  5. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4 Monthly Performance Report November 2015 W. K. Johnson President U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report NOV 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 74 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report NOV 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 74 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  6. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3 Monthly Performance Report October 2015 W. K. Johnson President U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report OCT 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 73 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report OCT 2015 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 73 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  7. MSC Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7 Monthly Performance Report August 2013 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report AUG 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 47 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report AUG 2013 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 47 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  8. MSC Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5 Monthly Performance Report February 2010 F.A. Figueroa President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report February 2010 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 5 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report February 2010 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 5 iii CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  9. MSC Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2 Monthly Performance Report July 2011 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report July 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 22 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report July 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 22 iii CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  10. MSC Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Monthly Performance Report June 2011 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report June 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 21 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report June 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 21 iii CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  11. MSC Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8 Monthly Performance Report March 2011 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report March 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 18 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report March 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 18 iii CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  12. MSC Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    0 Monthly Performance Report May 2011 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report May 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 20 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report May 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 REV 20 iii CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  13. MSC Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6 Monthly Performance Report November 2011 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 MSC Monthly Performance Report Nov 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 26 ii This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS MSC Monthly Performance Report Nov 2011 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 26 iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key

  14. Electricity Monthly Update

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Wholesale Markets: February 2014 The United States has many regional wholesale electricity markets. Below we look at monthly and annual ranges of on-peak, daily wholesale...

  15. Electricity Monthly Update

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    as collected via the Form EIA-923. Nuclear Outages: Reflects the average daily outage amount for the month as reported by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Power Reactor...

  16. National Energy Awareness Month

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    October is National Energy Awareness Month. It's also a chance to talk about our country’s energy security and its clean energy future.

  17. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Regional Wholesale Markets: May 2015 The United States has many regional wholesale electricity markets. Below we look at monthly and annual ranges of on-peak, daily wholesale...

  18. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Wholesale Markets: August 2015 The United States has many regional wholesale electricity markets. Below we look at monthly and annual ranges of on-peak, daily wholesale...

  19. ORSSAB Monthly Board Meeting

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ORSSAB monthly board meetingis open to the public. The board will receive an update on the Transuranic Waste Processing Center.

  20. ORSSAB monthly meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This month's ORSSAB board meeting will focus on the ETTP Zone 1 soils proposed plan. The meeting is open to the public.

  1. Native American Heritage Month

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This month, we celebrate the rich heritage and myriad contributions of American Indians and Alaska Natives, and we rededicate ourselves to supporting tribal sovereignty, tribal self-determination,...

  2. Monthly Energy Review

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    December 23, 1997 Electronic Access Monthly Energy Review (MER) data are also available through these electronic means: * ASCII text, Lotus (wk1), and Excel (xls) versions of the...

  3. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    the report month. Prices and demand are shown for six Regional Transmission Operator (RTO) markets: ISO New England (ISO-NE), New York ISO (NYISO), PJM Interconnection (PJM),...

  4. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. Refi ner retail petroleum product prices U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 7 March 2016

  5. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. Refi ner retail petroleum product volumes U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 9 March 2016

  6. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. Refi ner wholesale petroleum product volumes U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 13 March 20

  7. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    See all Electricity Reports Electricity Monthly Update With Data for November 2014 | Release Date: Jan. 26, 2015 | Next Release Date: Feb. 24, 2015 Previous Issues Issue:...

  8. Monthly Biodiesel Production Report

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Biodiesel (B100) production by Petroleum Administration for Defense District (PADD) ... Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-22M "Monthly Biodiesel Production ...

  9. Monthly Biodiesel Production Report

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Biodiesel producers and production capacity by state, December 2015 State Number of ... Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-22M "Monthly Biodiesel Production ...

  10. Monthly Biodiesel Production Report

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2016-01-01

    Presents monthly data on inventory held by biodiesel producers, production capacity, production, and sales quantities. Production capacity is reported at the national and state levels.

  11. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Methodology and Documentation General The Electricity Monthly Update is prepared by the Electric Power Operations Team, Office of Electricity, Renewables and Uranium Statistics,...

  12. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Electricity Monthly Update Explained Highlights The Highlights page features in the center a short article about a major event or an informative topic. The left column contains...

  13. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Contact Information and Staff The Electricity Monthly Update is prepared by the Electric Power Operations Team, Office of Electricity, Renewables and Uranium Statistics, U.S....

  14. Electric Power Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... In 1997, the SIC Manual name was changed to North American ... Education services 622 Health services 624 Social ... | Electric Power Monthly Public Administration 92 Multiple ...

  15. Monthly News Blast

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Bioenergy Social Media & Multimedia Corner Monthly ... and the Program Management Review are open to the ... and isolation" in the Journal of Applied Phycology. ...

  16. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... BUSINESS OPERATIONS MSC Monthly Performance Report MAY 2015 DOERL-2009-113 Rev 68 BO-3 FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING Rate Development - MSA Business Operations transmitted an electronic ...

  17. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly vii March 2016 Table ... Sales to end users Sales for resale December 2015 November 2015 December 2014 December ...

  18. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Petroleum Products for Local Consumption U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly Table 45. Prime supplier sales volumes ...

  19. Passive energy design and habitability aspects of earth-sheltered housing in Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Boyer, L.L.; Grondzik, W.T.; Weber, M.J.

    1980-05-01

    Identified earth-sheltered houses in Oklahoma were examined through a detailed questionnaire during the first phase of a long-range funded project. Preliminary results of energy and habitability aspects are presented here. Saving energy is reported to be the primary incentive for building such structures. Habitability aspects have generally not received much study until recently. The results indicate that although a majority of the respondents feel their energy-savings expectations have been reached, over 40% feel that their energy consumption is much higher than they expected. Preliminary energy performance studies indicate that in a majority of the projects, the potential thermal mass of the structure has been decoupled by insulation and furred interior surface treatments. This situation can lead to a significant reduction in the amount of free earth cooling available during the summer months. Other factors, not yet studied, undoubtedly contribute additional adverse effects. The substantial energy savings that are realized have been achieved with little decrease, and often an increase, in comfort and habitability aspects. Most occupants are particularly satisfied with the safety of the structure and the arrangement of the rooms, which in most cases were custom designed by or for the occupants. However, daylighting and privacy of family members, for example, were not as highly rated. A number of other parameters are identified from the survey that present implications for design enhancement in this contemporary type of residential structure. 14 references, 4 figures, 6 tables.

  20. GE funds initiative to support STEM initiatives in Oklahoma | GE Global

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Research STEM Empowers OK: Initiative to enrich STEM education in Oklahoma Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window) Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) STEM Empowers OK: Initiative to enrich STEM education in Oklahoma On April 21, 2015, GE announced a grant to the state of Oklahoma to enhance STEM education initiatives. Jeff Immelt, GE's

  1. Monthly Performance Report

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Monthly Performance Report October 2014 F. Armijo President and General Manager U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 This page intentionally left blank. MSC Monthly Performance Report OCT 2014 DOE/RL-2009-113 Rev 61 ii CONTENTS CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Accomplishments

  2. Seismic Fracture Characterization Methods for Enhanced Geothermal...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Seismic Fracture Characterization Methods for Enhanced Geothermal Systems; 2010 Geothermal Technology Program Peer Review Report Seismic Fracture Characterization Methods for...

  3. Controllable seismic source

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Gomez, Antonio; DeRego, Paul Jeffrey; Ferrel, Patrick Andrew; Thom, Robert Anthony; Trujillo, Joshua J.; Herridge, Brian

    2014-08-19

    An apparatus for generating seismic waves includes a housing, a strike surface within the housing, and a hammer movably disposed within the housing. An actuator induces a striking motion in the hammer such that the hammer impacts the strike surface as part of the striking motion. The actuator is selectively adjustable to change characteristics of the striking motion and characteristics of seismic waves generated by the impact. The hammer may be modified to change the physical characteristics of the hammer, thereby changing characteristics of seismic waves generated by the hammer. The hammer may be disposed within a removable shock cavity, and the apparatus may include two hammers and two shock cavities positioned symmetrically about a center of the apparatus.

  4. Controllable seismic source

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Gomez, Antonio; DeRego, Paul Jeffrey; Ferrell, Patrick Andrew; Thom, Robert Anthony; Trujillo, Joshua J.; Herridge, Brian

    2015-09-29

    An apparatus for generating seismic waves includes a housing, a strike surface within the housing, and a hammer movably disposed within the housing. An actuator induces a striking motion in the hammer such that the hammer impacts the strike surface as part of the striking motion. The actuator is selectively adjustable to change characteristics of the striking motion and characteristics of seismic waves generated by the impact. The hammer may be modified to change the physical characteristics of the hammer, thereby changing characteristics of seismic waves generated by the hammer. The hammer may be disposed within a removable shock cavity, and the apparatus may include two hammers and two shock cavities positioned symmetrically about a center of the apparatus.

  5. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. Refi ner residual fuel oil prices and volumes Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-782A, "Refi ners'/Gas Plant Operators' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." Source: U. U U S. S S S E E E Ene ne nerg rg rgy y y In n n nfo fo o orm rm rm mat at atio io io i n n n Ad Ad Ad d dministration, Form EIA-782A, "Refi ners'/Gas Plant Operators' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 28

  6. AEP Public Service Company of Oklahoma- Non-Residential Efficiency Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    AEP Public Services Company of Oklahoma (PSO) offers several incentives and programs to non-residential customers who install energy efficiency measures or wish to evaluate their energy usage and...

  7. Cost-Effectiveness of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010 for the State of Oklahoma

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hart, Philip R.; Rosenberg, Michael I.; Xie, YuLong; Zhang, Jian; Richman, Eric E.; Elliott, Douglas B.; Loper, Susan A.; Myer, Michael

    2013-11-01

    Moving to the ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 version from the Base Code (90.1-2007) is cost-effective for all building types and climate zones in the State of Oklahoma.

  8. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Company (AOG)- Commerial and Industrial Efficiency Rebate Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Arkansas Oklahoma Gas (AOG) programs are available to all commercial and industrial AOG customers in Arkansas. The Commercial and Industrial Prescriptive program offers rebates for the instal...

  9. National Women's History Month

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    During Women's History Month, we recall that the pioneering legacy of our grandmothers and great-grandmothers is revealed not only in our museums and history books, but also in the fierce...

  10. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    in the Northeast. States from Pennsylvania to the north and east are shaded grey due to a low CDD baseline for the month, obscuring record average temperatures in that...

  11. National Cybersecurity Awareness Month

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The White House has designated October as National Cybersecurity Awareness Month (NCSAM) in which the Department of Energy (DOE) joins the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others across...

  12. Historical Monthly Energy Review

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    73-92) Distribution Category UC-950 Historical Monthly Energy Review 1973-1992 Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy...

  13. Monthly Energy Review

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    May 26, 1998 Electronic Access Monthly Energy Review (MER) data are also avail- able through these electronic means: * ASCII text, Lotus (wk1), and Excel (xls) versions of the MER...

  14. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The ORSSAB monthly board meeting is open to the public. The board will hear a presentation and discuss the development of a comprehensive mercury strategy for the Oak Ridge Reservation.

  15. Monthly Biodiesel Production Report

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    U.S. Inputs to biodiesel production million pounds Period Canola oil Corn oil Cottonseed ... Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-22M "Monthly Biodiesel Production ...

  16. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    California (CAISO) due to very low natural gas prices. Hawaii's retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour fell the most of any state for the fifth month in a row, down 24%...

  17. Electricity Monthly Update

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    not necessarily coincide with the beginning and the end of months. For example, retail revenue and sales data reported in July reflects data for billing cycles that end sometime...

  18. Disability Employment Awareness Month

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Utilizing the talents of all Americans is essential for our Nation to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world.  During National Disability Employment Awareness Month, we...

  19. Black History Month

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    During National African American History Month, we pay tribute to the contributions of past generations and reaffirm our commitment to keeping the American dream alive for the next generation. In...

  20. Monthly Reports 2014

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Number: NM4890139088-TSDF Jose R. FrancoCBFO and Robert L. McQuinnNWP dated December 29, 2014 Monthly Report for the...

  1. ORSSAB monthly board meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The ORSSAB monthly board meeting is open to the public. The board will receive an update on the Community Reuse Organization of East Tennessee efforts at the East Tennessee Technology Park.

  2. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 92 March 2016 Table 45. Prime supplier sales volumes of motor gasoline by grade, ...

  3. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 82 March 2016 Table 42. Refi ner No. 2 diesel fuel volumes by PAD District and ...

  4. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 104 March 2016 Table 47. Prime supplier sales volumes of dis llate fuel oils and ...

  5. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 86 March 2016 Table 43. Refi ner No. 2 dis llate and fuel oil volumes by PAD ...

  6. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 24 March 2016 Table 11. U.S. refi ner reformulated motor gasoline volumes by ...

  7. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 100 March 2016 Table 46. Prime supplier sales volumes of avia on fuels, no. 4 ...

  8. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... W - W W W W - 32.4 - December 2014 W W - W W W W - 42.7 - See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 58 March 2016 Table ...

  9. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 8 March 2016 Table 4. U.S. refi ner prices of petroleum products for resale dollars per gallon excluding taxes ...

  10. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 66 March 2016 Table 40. Refi ner motor gasoline volumes by formula on, sales ...

  11. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 4 March 2016 Table 1A. Refi ner acquisi on cost of crude oil by PAD Districts ...

  12. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 54 March 2016 Table 33. Refi ner prices of dis llate fuels by PAD District and ...

  13. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 78 March 2016 Table 41. Refi ner volumes of avia on fuels, kerosene, No. 1 dis ...

  14. Oklahoma Natural Gas Vented and Flared (Million Cubic Feet)

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Vented and Flared (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Vented and Flared (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 126,629 129,408 130,766 1970's 129,629 39,799 38,797 36,411 34,199 31,802 30,197 29,186 27,489 26,605 1980's 25,555 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release

  15. Oklahoma Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries (Percent)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    % of Total Residential Deliveries (Percent) Oklahoma Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries (Percent) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 1.58 1.43 1.42 1.46 1.44 1.47 1.30 2000's 1.34 1.35 1.37 1.29 1.22 1.23 1.21 1.27 1.35 1.30 2010's 1.37 1.30 1.18 1.35 1.36 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016

  16. Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Volume (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Underground Storage Volume (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Volume (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 296,629 281,511 286,917 279,978 298,202 307,083 317,720 325,432 332,591 338,392 353,804 327,277 1991 283,982 278,961 284,515 298,730 313,114 323,305 324,150 328,823 338,810 342,711 317,072 306,300 1992 288,415 280,038 276,287 282,263 290,192 301,262 318,719 326,705 339,394 346,939 330,861 299,990 1993 275,054 253,724

  17. Small Wind Electric Systems: An Oklahoma Consumer's Guide

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    2007-08-01

    Small Wind Electric Systems: An Oklahoma Consumer's Guide provides consumers with information to help them determine whether a small wind electric system can provide all or a portion of the energy they need for their home or business based on their wind resource, energy needs, and economics. Topics include how to make a home more energy efficient, how to choose the correct turbine size, the parts of a wind electric system, how to determine whether enough wind resource exists, how to choose the best site for a turbine, how to connect a system to the utility grid, and whether it's possible to become independent of the utility grid using wind energy. In addition, the cover of the guide contains a list of contacts for more information.

  18. Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1,129 1,324 1,022 1980's 1,690 1,864 1,815 1,191 1,016 1,134 861 823 1,030 713 1990's 707 485 382 548 818 661 714 638 600 624 2000's 894 1,325 1,186 1,509 1,983 1,818 2,051 2,380 2,974 3,463 2010's 4,571 5,735 4,903 3,300 3,661 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid

  19. Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1,016 969 1,211 1980's 1,303 1,371 2,520 1,891 1,611 1,648 1,963 2,047 2,280 1,732 1990's 1,542 1,456 1,263 1,008 932 1,049 1,602 1,282 1,997 2,251 2000's 1,331 1,895 1,513 2,843 1,912 2,945 1,868 1,366 2,580 3,592 2010's 3,474 6,856 7,731 5,031 4,585 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not

  20. Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 837 962 1,026 1980's 1,293 1,262 2,374 2,189 2,245 2,357 2,158 2,251 2,538 1,984 1990's 1,803 1,710 1,988 1,554 1,580 1,892 1,886 2,396 2,995 3,029 2000's 2,498 1,458 2,159 2,892 2,173 3,064 1,515 2,115 2,786 2,894 2010's 3,224 5,142 4,153 4,118 6,573 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not

  1. Oklahoma Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 49,480 60,470 57,064 54,495 68,664 60,418 51,833 1990's 72,318 46,200 53,278 60,658 55,607 45,946 37,803 51,042 35,509 32,868 2000's 41,032 38,916 30,281 40,292 35,875 35,989 36,396 38,229 42,250 40,164 2010's 39,489 40,819 43,727 45,581 50,621 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W =

  2. Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers (Number of Elements)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Commercial Consumers (Number of Elements) Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 87,824 86,666 86,172 1990's 85,790 86,744 87,120 88,181 87,494 88,358 89,852 90,284 89,711 80,986 2000's 80,558 79,045 80,029 79,733 79,512 78,726 78,745 93,991 94,247 94,314 2010's 92,430 93,903 94,537 95,385 96,004 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid

  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers (Number of Elements)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Industrial Consumers (Number of Elements) Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 2,772 2,689 2,877 1990's 2,889 2,840 2,859 2,912 2,853 2,845 2,843 2,531 3,295 3,040 2000's 2,821 3,403 3,438 3,367 3,283 2,855 2,811 2,822 2,920 2,618 2010's 2,731 2,733 2,872 2,958 3,063 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual

  4. Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers (Number of Elements)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Residential Consumers (Number of Elements) Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 809,171 805,107 806,875 1990's 814,296 824,172 832,677 842,130 845,448 856,604 866,531 872,454 877,236 867,922 2000's 859,951 868,314 875,338 876,420 875,271 880,403 879,589 920,616 923,650 924,745 2010's 914,869 922,240 927,346 931,981 937,237 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not

  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 26,130 24,242 23,833 2000's 21,001 23,537 23,340 30,396 30,370 31,444 31,333 28,463 27,581 28,876 2010's 30,611 30,948 32,838 41,813 45,391 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release Date: 3/31/2016

  6. Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 29,750 31,237 31,121 29,705 35,751 40,508 38,392 1990's 39,249 42,166 39,700 39,211 35,432 34,900 35,236 30,370 26,034 25,055 2000's 25,934 28,266 25,525 26,276 27,818 27,380 28,435 28,213 27,161 24,089 2010's 23,238 24,938 27,809 32,119 36,231 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W =

  7. Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 50,952 55,724 57,270 1970's 58,926 55,914 56,376 61,647 62,860 60,008 52,087 55,238 61,868 71,559 1980's 74,434 80,401 85,934 90,772 98,307 99,933 100,305 99,170 103,302 94,889 1990's 96,698 101,851 104,609 101,962 101,564 94,930 100,379 96,830 92,785 93,308 2000's 96,787 88,885 81,287 74,745 84,355 87,404

  8. Oklahoma Natural Gas Vented and Flared (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Vented and Flared (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Vented and Flared (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 126,629 129,408 130,766 1970's 129,629 39,799 38,797 36,411 34,199 31,802 30,197 29,186 27,489 26,605 1980's 25,555 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next Release

  9. Oklahoma Quantity of Production Associated with Reported Wellhead Value

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    (Million Cubic Feet) Quantity of Production Associated with Reported Wellhead Value (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Quantity of Production Associated with Reported Wellhead Value (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 1,730,061 1,985,869 1,936,341 1,917,493 2,004,797 2,106,632 2,185,204 1990's 2,186,153 2,119,161 1,937,224 2,005,971 1,879,257 1,765,788 1,751,487 1,452,233 1,644,531 1,577,961 2000's 1,612,890 1,477,058 1,456,375

  10. Oklahoma Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation,

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 2,246 1980's 2,252 2,441 2,426 2,269 2,244 2,149 2,191 2,017 1,894 1,785 1990's 1,820 1,406 1,483 1,550 1,342 1,228 1,023 1,015 1,196 1,238 2000's 1,113 1,109 1,177

  11. Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 13,889 14,417 13,816 1980's 13,138 14,699 16,207 16,211 16,126 16,040 16,685 16,711 16,495 15,916 1990's 16,151 14,725 13,926 13,289 13,487 13,438 13,074 13,439 13,645 12,543 2000's 13,699 13,558 14,886 15,401 16,238 17,123 17,464 19,031 20,845 22,769 2010's 26,345 27,830 26,599 26,873 31,778 -

  12. Oklahoma Natural Gas Total Consumption (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Total Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Total Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 567,050 575,855 538,329 2000's 538,563 491,458 508,298 540,103 538,576 582,536 624,400 658,379 687,989 659,305 2010's 675,727 655,919 691,661 658,569 640,607 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 2/29/2016 Next

  13. Oklahoma Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Cubic Feet) Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 14,545 1980's 13,908 15,507 17,140 17,261 17,102 17,078 17,779 17,703 17,450 16,733 1990's 16,967 15,518 14,732 14,099 14,323 14,295 13,952 14,311 14,517 13,490 2000's 14,543 14,366 15,753 16,231 17,200 18,146 18,535 20,184 22,113 24,207 2010's

  14. Oklahoma Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 12,299 1980's 11,656 13,066 14,714 14,992 14,858 14,929 15,588 15,686 15,556 14,948 1990's 15,147 14,112 13,249 12,549 12,981 13,067 12,929 13,296 13,321 12,252 2000's 13,430 13,256 14,576

  15. BLACK HISTORY MONTH

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Black History Month is an annual celebration of achievements by black Americans and a time for recognizing the central role of African Americans in U.S. history. The event grew out of “Negro History Week,” created by historian Carter G. Woodson and other prominent African Americans. Other countries around the world, including Canada and the United Kingdom, also devote a month to celebrating black history.

  16. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Prices of Petroleum Products U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly Table 31. Refi ner motor gasoline prices by grade, sales type, PAD District, and state dollars per gallon excluding taxes Geographic area month Regular Midgrade Premium All grades Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Through retail outlets Other end users[a] Through retail outlets Other end

  17. Monthly Report 2015

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Report 2015 Monthly Report for the Reporting Period ending November 30, 2015, as required by NMED Administrative Orders dated February 27, 2014 and May 12, 2014, as Amended by NMED Directives dated August 29, 2014, December 9, 2014, and July 15, 2015 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Number: NM4890139088-TSDF Todd Shrader/CBFO and Philip J. Breidenbach/NWP dated December 31, 2015 Monthly Report for the Reporting Period ending October 31, 2015, as required by NMED

  18. POLICY FLASH 2013-55 FPDS-NG Change Management Notice for the Oklahoma

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Tornado and Storm | Department of Energy POLICY FLASH 2013-55 FPDS-NG Change Management Notice for the Oklahoma Tornado and Storm POLICY FLASH 2013-55 FPDS-NG Change Management Notice for the Oklahoma Tornado and Storm This Flash will be available online at the following website: http://energy.gov/management/office-management/operational-management/procurement-and-acquisition/policy-flashes Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Kevin M. Smith, of the Contract and

  19. Interactions Between the Daytime Mixed Layer and the Surface: Oklahoma Mesonet and EBBR Heat Fluxes

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Interactions Between the Daytime Mixed Layer and the Surface: Oklahoma Mesonet and EBBR Heat Fluxes R. L. Coulter Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois Introduction Surface layer estimates of surface sensible heat flux have been made at 10 - 14 locations within the Central Facility (CF) of the Southern Great Plains (SGP) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program site by using energy balance Bowen ratio (EBBR) stations located mostly in uncultivated areas. The advent of the Oklahoma

  20. Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma - Assessment of Wind Resource on Tribal Land

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma The Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma is a federally recognized Indian Tribe eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indian Tribes, and is recognized as possessing and exercising powers of self- government. Mission The overall objective of the Tribe is to improve the economic and social quality of life for Tribal members and adjacent communities, and to secure the rights, powers and privileges common to a sovereign entity of government. The

  1. Nonstructural seismic restraint guidelines

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Butler, D.M.; Czapinski, R.H.; Firneno, M.J.; Feemster, H.C.; Fornaciari, N.R.; Hillaire, R.G.; Kinzel, R.L.; Kirk, D.; McMahon, T.T.

    1993-08-01

    The Nonstructural Seismic Restraint Guidelines provide general information about how to secure or restrain items (such as material, equipment, furniture, and tools) in order to prevent injury and property, environmental, or programmatic damage during or following an earthquake. All SNL sites may experience earthquakes of magnitude 6.0 or higher on the Richter scale. Therefore, these guidelines are written for all SNL sites.

  2. 6-Month Work Plan

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    January 9, 2011 Page 1 of 1 RIVER & PLATEAU COMMITTEE - 6 MONTH WORK PLAN January * River Corridor Cleanup, using 100 K as an Example * Draft A, 100 K Proposed Plan * PW-1,3,6/CW-5 ROD: Draft letter February * TPA Milestone Delays for Central Plateau - 30 month delay on interim milestones driven by funding. Information session. * TRU Burial Grounds in 200 W (PU Waste Excavated from Z9 in 1973) * Barriers discussion (follow up from workshop) * 300 Area RI/FS (document due in December) *

  3. Monthly energy review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-12-01

    This document presents an overview of the Energy Information Administration`s (EIA) recent monthly energy statistics. The statistics cover the major activities of U.S. production, consumption, trade, stocks, and prices for petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, and nuclear energy. Also included are international energy and thermal and metric conversion factors.

  4. National Cybersecurity Awareness Month

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Every October, the Department of Energy joins the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others across the country in support of National Cybersecurity Awareness Month and the “Stop. Think. Connect.” campaign. This year marks the tenth year of the cybersecurity awareness campaign.

  5. Monthly Energy Review

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-05-28

    This publication presents an overview of the Energy information Administration`s recent monthly energy statistics. The statistics cover the major activities of US production, consumption, trade, stocks, and prices for petroleum, natural gas, coal, electricity, and nuclear energy. Also included are international energy and thermal and metric conversion factors. Two brief ``energy plugs`` (reviews of EIA publications) are included, as well.

  6. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... 2.9 - 3.2 September 21.0 21.3 18.0 225.2 22.4 265.5 1.8 1.8 0.3 2.7 - 3.1 October 21.2 ... U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 16 March 2016 Table ...

  7. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly Table 1. Crude oil ... 21.13 22.59 21.76 22.22 1991 average 16.54 16.89 18.02 19.33 18.70 19.06 1992 average ...

  8. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... 1.8 - 1.9 December 14.0 14.2 4.1 159.7 18.9 182.7 0.8 0.8 0.1 1.7 - 1.8 See footnotes at end of table. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly 20 March ...

  9. Seismic Structure And Seismicity Of The Cooling Lava Lake Of...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Of The Cooling Lava Lake Of Kilauea Iki, Hawaii Abstract The use of multiple methods is indispensable for the determination of the seismic properties of a complex body...

  10. Petroleum marketing monthly

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-02-01

    The Petroleum Marketing Monthly (PMM) provides information and statistical data on a variety of crude oils and refined petroleum products. The publication presents statistics on crude oil costs and refined petroleum products sales for use by industry, government, private sector analysts, educational institutions, and consumers. Data on crude oil include the domestic first purchase price, the f.o.b. and landed cost of imported crude oil, and the refiners acquisition cost of crude oil. Refined petroleum product sales data include motor gasoline, distillates, residuals, aviation fuels, kerosene, and propane. The Petroleum Marketing Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration ensures the accuracy, quality, and confidentiality of the published data in the Petroleum Marketing Monthly.

  11. Petroleum marketing monthly

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-07-01

    Petroleum Marketing Monthly (PPM) provides information and statistical data on a variety of crude oils and refined petroleum products. The publication presents statistics on crude oil costs and refined petroleum products sales for use by industry, government, private sector analysts, educational institutions, and consumers. Data on crude oil include the domestic first purchase price, the f.o. b. and landed cost of imported crude oil, and the refiners` acquisition cost of crude oil. Refined petroleum product sales data include motor gasoline, distillates, residuals, aviation fuels, kerosene, and propane. The Petroleum Marketing Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration ensures the accuracy, quality, and confidentiality of the published data in the Petroleum Marketing Monthly.

  12. Petroleum marketing monthly

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-08-01

    The Petroleum Marketing Monthly (PMM) provides information and statistical data on a variety of crude oils and refined petroleum products. The publication presents statistics on crude oil costs and refined petroleum products sales for use by industry, government, private sector analysts, educational institutions, and consumers. Data on crude oil include the domestic first purchase price, the f.o.b. and landed cost of imported crude oil, and the refiners` acquisition cost of crude oil. Refined petroleum product sales data include motor gasoline, distillates, residuals, aviation fuels, kerosene, and propane. The Petroleum Marketing Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration ensures the accuracy, quality, and confidentiality of the published data in the Petroleum Marketing Monthly.

  13. Electric power monthly

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-08-01

    The Energy Information Administration (EIA) prepares the Electric Power Monthly (EPM) for a wide audience including Congress, Federal and State agencies, the electric utility industry, and the general public. This publication provides monthly statistics for net generation, fossil fuel consumption and stocks, quantity and quality of fossil fuels, cost of fossil fuels, electricity sales, revenue, and average revenue per kilowatthour of electricity sold. Data on net generation, fuel consumption, fuel stocks, quantity and cost of fossil fuels are also displayed for the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) regions. The EIA publishes statistics in the EPM on net generation by energy source, consumption, stocks, quantity, quality, and cost of fossil fuels; and capability of new generating units by company and plant. The purpose of this publication is to provide energy decisionmakers with accurate and timely information that may be used in forming various perspectives on electric issues that lie ahead.

  14. Electric power monthly

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, Sandra R.; Johnson, Melvin; McClevey, Kenneth; Calopedis, Stephen; Bolden, Deborah

    1992-05-01

    The Electric Power Monthly is prepared by the Survey Management Division; Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels, Energy Information Administration (EIA), Department of Energy. This publication provides monthly statistics at the national, Census division, and State levels for net generation, fuel consumption, fuel stocks, quantity and quality of fuel, cost of fuel, electricity sales, revenue, and average revenue per kilowatthour of electricity sold. Data on net generation, fuel consumption, fuel stocks, quantity and cost of fuel are also displayed for the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) regions. Additionally, statistics by company and plant are published in the EPM on capability of new plants, new generation, fuel consumption, fuel stocks, quantity and quality of fuel, and cost of fuel.

  15. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Prices U.S. Energy Information Administration | Petroleum Marketing Monthly Table 18. Domes c crude oil fi rst purchase prices dollars per barrel Year month U.S. Average PAD District 1 PAD District 2 U.S. Average Less AK North Slope Average NY PA WV Average IL IN KS KY MI NE 1990 20.03 21.57 22.06 23.32 23.00 22.16 22.88 23.36 23.46 23.21 23.20 22.92 21.94 1991 16.54 18.16 19.01 19.67 19.48 W 19.58 20.19 20.20 19.84 19.84 19.88 18.78 1992 15.99 17.38 18.52 19.05 19.01 18.09 18.63 19.26 19.27

  16. Monthly Newsblast December 2012

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    YouTube  Facebook  Twitter Program Blog Past Newsletters Program Presentations Biomass Social Media & Multimedia Corner Monthly News Blast December 2012 New Year, New Name As changes to the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy are put into place, the Biomass Program is being rebranded. Effective in 2013, we'll be known as the "Biomass Technologies Office." New Funding Opportunity Announcement: Carbon, Hydrogen, and Separation Efficiencies

  17. Petroleum Supply Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    8 December 2015 Appendix D Northeast Reserves Reserves inventories are not considered to be in the commercial sector and are excluded from EIA's commercial motor gasoline and distillate fuel oil supply and disposition statistics, such as those reported in the Weekly Petroleum Status Report, Petroleum Supply Monthly, and This Week In Petroleum. Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve classifed as ultra-low sulfur distillate (15 parts per million) Terminal Operator Location Thousand Barrels Buckeye

  18. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Contact Information and Staff The Electricity Monthly Update is prepared by the Electric Power Operations Team, Office of Electricity, Renewables and Uranium Statistics, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy. Editorial Lead: Chris Cassar (christopher.cassar@eia.gov) Senior Adviser: Bill Booth Core Team: Paul McCardle, Glenn McGrath, Stephen Scott, Tim Shear, April Lee

  19. NUG Monthly Telecon Welcome!

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8th 2015 NUG Monthly Telecon Welcome! - 3 - Jeff Broughton NERSC Deputy for Operations Computational Research and Theory Facility (CRT) - 3 - - 4 - CRT is complete, and NERSC is moving in! - 4 - - 5 - CRT will help meet the needs of future Exascale system * Accommodate system trends - Power and power density is increasing - Systems are getting heavier - Expect (exotic) liquid cooling * Accommodate system growth - Capability for flexible expansion is key * Improve energy efficiency - Exploit Bay

  20. Induced Seismicity | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    of Project DOE Funding Total Project Cost Mapping Diffuse Seismicity for Geothermal Reservoir Management with Matched Field Processing California Lawrence Livermore National...

  1. EXPLOITATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF RESERVOIR PERFORMANCE IN HUNTON FORMATION, OKLAHOMA

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mohan Kelkar

    2005-02-01

    Hunton formation in Oklahoma has displayed some unique production characteristics. These include high initial water-oil and gas-oil ratios, decline in those ratios over time and temporary increase in gas-oil ratio during pressure build up. The formation also displays highly complex geology, but surprising hydrodynamic continuity. This report addresses three key issues related specifically to West Carney Hunton field and, in general, to any other Hunton formation exhibiting similar behavior: (1) What is the primary mechanism by which oil and gas is produced from the field? (2) How can the knowledge gained from studying the existing fields can be extended to other fields which have the potential to produce? (3) What can be done to improve the performance of this reservoir? We have developed a comprehensive model to explain the behavior of the reservoir. By using available production, geological, core and log data, we are able to develop a reservoir model which explains the production behavior in the reservoir. Using easily available information, such as log data, we have established the parameters needed for a field to be economically successful. We provide guidelines in terms of what to look for in a new field and how to develop it. Finally, through laboratory experiments, we show that surfactants can be used to improve the hydrocarbons recovery from the field. In addition, injection of CO{sub 2} or natural gas also will help us recover additional oil from the field.

  2. Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1,691 1,667 1,592 1980's 1,526 1,700 1,636 1,544 1,778 1,686 1,658 1,813 1,896 1,983 1990's 2,058 1,983 1,895 1,770 1,721 1,562 1,580 1,555 1,544 1,308 2000's 1,473 1,481 1,518 1,554 1,563 1,587 1,601 1,659 1,775 1,790 2010's 1,703 1,697 1,763 1,890 2,123 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable;

  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use Price (Dollars per

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Thousand Cubic Feet) Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 0.15 0.15 1.65 1970's 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.22 0.26 0.27 0.36 0.58 0.66 0.99 1980's 1.45 1.83 2.53 2.75 2.71 2.48 2.30 2.06 2.10 1.83 1990's 1.85 1.62 1.79 1.72 1.64 1.36 2.12 2.34 1.90 2.04 2000's 3.49 3.21 NA -- -- -- - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA

  4. Oklahoma Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 0.14 0.14 0.15 1970's 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.19 0.28 0.32 0.50 0.79 0.90 1.12 1980's 1.51 1.88 2.74 2.83 2.72 2.47 1.71 1.47 1.55 1.59 1990's 1.57 1.47 1.70 1.88 1.70 1.44 2.21 2.32 1.77 2.05 2000's 3.63 4.03 2.94 4.97 5.52 7.21 6.32 6.24 7.56 3.53 2010's 4.71 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable;

  5. Automating Shallow Seismic Imaging

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Steeples, Don W.

    2004-12-09

    This seven-year, shallow-seismic reflection research project had the aim of improving geophysical imaging of possible contaminant flow paths. Thousands of chemically contaminated sites exist in the United States, including at least 3,700 at Department of Energy (DOE) facilities. Imaging technologies such as shallow seismic reflection (SSR) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) sometimes are capable of identifying geologic conditions that might indicate preferential contaminant-flow paths. Historically, SSR has been used very little at depths shallower than 30 m, and even more rarely at depths of 10 m or less. Conversely, GPR is rarely useful at depths greater than 10 m, especially in areas where clay or other electrically conductive materials are present near the surface. Efforts to image the cone of depression around a pumping well using seismic methods were only partially successful (for complete references of all research results, see the full Final Technical Report, DOE/ER/14826-F), but peripheral results included development of SSR methods for depths shallower than one meter, a depth range that had not been achieved before. Imaging at such shallow depths, however, requires geophone intervals of the order of 10 cm or less, which makes such surveys very expensive in terms of human time and effort. We also showed that SSR and GPR could be used in a complementary fashion to image the same volume of earth at very shallow depths. The primary research focus of the second three-year period of funding was to develop and demonstrate an automated method of conducting two-dimensional (2D) shallow-seismic surveys with the goal of saving time, effort, and money. Tests involving the second generation of the hydraulic geophone-planting device dubbed the ''Autojuggie'' showed that large numbers of geophones can be placed quickly and automatically and can acquire high-quality data, although not under rough topographic conditions. In some easy-access environments, this device could make SSR surveying considerably more efficient and less expensive, particularly when geophone intervals of 25 cm or less are required. The most recent research analyzed the difference in seismic response of the geophones with variable geophone spike length and geophones attached to various steel media. Experiments investigated the azimuthal dependence of the quality of data relative to the orientation of the rigidly attached geophones. Other experiments designed to test the hypothesis that the data are being amplified in much the same way that an organ pipe amplifies sound have so far proved inconclusive. Taken together, the positive results show that SSR imaging within a few meters of the earth's surface is possible if the geology is suitable, that SSR imaging can complement GPR imaging, and that SSR imaging could be made significantly more cost effective, at least in areas where the topography and the geology are favorable. Increased knowledge of the Earth's shallow subsurface through non-intrusive techniques is of potential benefit to management of DOE facilities. Among the most significant problems facing hydrologists today is the delineation of preferential permeability paths in sufficient detail to make a quantitative analysis possible. Aquifer systems dominated by fracture flow have a reputation of being particularly difficult to characterize and model. At chemically contaminated sites, including U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facilities and others at Department of Defense (DOD) installations worldwide, establishing the spatial extent of the contamination, along with the fate of the contaminants and their transport-flow directions, is essential to the development of effective cleanup strategies. Detailed characterization of the shallow subsurface is important not only in environmental, groundwater, and geotechnical engineering applications, but also in neotectonics, mining geology, and the analysis of petroleum reservoir analogs. Near-surface seismology is in the vanguard of non-intrusive approaches to increase knowledge of the shallow subsurface; our work is a significant departure from conventional seismic-survey field procedures.

  6. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Monthly March 2016 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other offi cer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the

  7. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Refi ner motor gasoline prices by grade, sales type, PAD District, and state dollars per gallon excluding taxes Geographic area month Regular Midgrade Premium All grades Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Through retail outlets Other end users[a] Through retail outlets Other end users[a] Through retail outlets Other end users[a] Through retail outlets Other end users[a] United States

  8. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. refi ner motor gasoline prices by grade and sales type dollars per gallon excluding taxes Year month Regular Midgrade Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Through retail outlets Average[a] DTW Rack Bulk Average Through retail outlets Average[a] DTW Rack Bulk Average 1985 0.925 0.917 - - - 0.843 - - - - - - 1986 0.624 0.616 - - - 0.522 - - - - - - 1987 0.659 0.650 - - - 0.569 - - - - - - 1988 0.649 0.641 - - - 0.548 - - - - - - 1989 0.720 0.714 - - - 0.618

  9. Electricity Monthly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Electric Power Sector Coal Stocks: December 2015 Stocks In December, U.S. coal stockpiles increased to 197 million tons, up 4% from the previous month. This increase in November-to-December coal stockpiles can be attributed to the significant decrease in coal consumption that occurred in December due to the record warm temperatures and reduced reliance on coal as a fuel used for electricity generation. Overall U.S. coal stockpile are now nearing record levels due to the loss in market share to

  10. Petroleum marketing monthly

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-11-01

    The Petroleum Marketing Monthly (PMM) provides information and statistical data on a variety of crude oils and refined petroleum products. The publication presents statistics on crude oil costs and refined petroleum products sales for use by industry, government, private sector analysts, educational institutions, and consumers. Data on crude oil include the domestic first purchase price, the f.o.b. and landed cost of imported crude oil, and the refiners` acquisition cost of crude oil. Refined petroleum product sales data include motor gasoline, distillates, residuals, aviation fuels, kerosene, and propane. The Petroleum Marketing Division, Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration ensures the accuracy, quality, and confidentiality of the published data.

  11. Monthly Energy Review - April 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: May 25, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  12. Monthly Energy Review - August 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: August 26, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  13. Monthly Energy Review - January 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: January 30, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  14. Monthly Energy Review - May 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: May 26, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  15. Monthly Energy Review - October 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: October 26, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  16. Monthly Energy Review - November 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: November 23, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  17. Monthly Energy Review - September 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: September 28, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  18. Monthly Energy Review - May 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200705) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  19. Monthly Energy Review - November 2002

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: December 6, 2002 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  20. Monthly Energy Review -January 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: January 27, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  1. Monthly Energy Review - February 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: February 24, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  2. Monthly Energy Review - June 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200706) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  3. Monthly Energy Review - January 2010

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    workday of each month. Released: January 29, 2010 DOEEIA-0035(201001) Monthly Energy Review January 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets...

  4. Monthly Energy Review - February 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200702) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  5. Monthly Energy Review - November 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: November 24, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  6. Monthly Energy Review - October 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    0) October 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics....

  7. Monthly Energy Review - March 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: March 29, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  8. Monthly Energy Review - September 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: September 27, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  9. Monthly Energy Review - May 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: June 10, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  10. Monthly Energy Review - June 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: June 27, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  11. Monthly Energy Review - February 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: February 23, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  12. Monthly Energy Review - December 2002

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: December 23, 2002 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  13. Monthly Energy Review - March 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: April 2, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  14. Monthly Energy Review - October 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: October 26, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  15. Monthly Energy Review - July 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: July 27, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  16. Monthly Energy Review - February 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: February 23, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  17. Monthly Energy Review - June 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: June 30, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  18. Monthly Energy Review - April 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200704) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  19. Monthly Energy Review - July 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: July 26, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  20. Monthly Energy Review - December 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: December 23, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  1. Monthly Energy Review - June 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: June 25, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  2. Monthly Energy Review - April 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: May 22, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  3. Monthly Energy Review - September 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: September 26, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  4. Monthly Energy Review - May 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: May 25, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  5. Monthly Energy Review - September 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: September 27, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  6. Monthly Energy Review - November 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: November 23, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  7. Monthly Energy Review - April 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: April 27, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  8. Monthly Energy Review - August 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: August 29, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  9. Monthly Energy Review - March 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200703) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  10. Monthly Energy Review - December 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: December 21, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  11. Monthly Energy Review - August 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: August 28, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  12. Monthly Energy Review - April 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: April 25, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  13. Monthly Energy Review - November 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: November 22, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  14. Monthly Energy Review - March 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: March 31, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  15. Monthly Energy Review - October 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: October 27, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  16. Monthly Energy Review - April 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: April 28, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  17. Monthly Energy Review - July 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200707) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  18. Monthly Energy Review - January 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: January 29, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  19. Monthly Energy Review - December 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: December 22, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  20. Monthly Energy Review - October 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: October 26, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  1. Monthly Energy Review - February 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: February 28, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  2. Monthly Energy Review - July 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: July 26, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  3. Monthly Energy Review - December 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: December 22, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  4. Monthly Energy Review - August 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: August 25, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  5. Monthly Energy Review - March 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: March 27, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  6. Monthly Energy Review - June 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Released for Printing: June 27, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  7. Monthly Energy Review - January 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    for Printing: January 25, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  8. Monthly Energy review - July 2009

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9 July 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200907) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical...

  9. Monthly Energy Review - January 2009

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are...

  10. Monthly Energy review - September 2009

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9 September 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200909) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and...

  11. Monthly Energy Review - November 2008

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are...

  12. Monthly Energy review - August 2009

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9 August 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200908) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical...

  13. Monthly Energy Review - December 2008

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are...

  14. Monthly Energy Review - November 2009

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    November 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200911) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical...

  15. Monthly Energy Review - October 2009

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9 October 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200910) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical...

  16. Monthly Energy Review - September 2007

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    09) September 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics....

  17. Monthly Energy Review - February 2009

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are...

  18. Monthly Energy Review - November 2007

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1) November 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics....

  19. Monthly Energy Review - December 2007

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2) December 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics....

  20. Monthly Energy Review - August 2007

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Energy Information Administration DOEEIA-0035(200708) August 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary...

  1. Induced Seismicity Impact | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Seismicity Impact Jump to: navigation, search Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleInducedSeismicityImpact&oldid612409" Feedback Contact needs updating...

  2. Seismic & Natural Phenomena Hazards | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    designed to withstand the hazards. CNS maintains a panel of experts known as the Seismic Lessons-Learned Panel, which meets periodically to discuss seismic issues impacting DOE...

  3. Hanford Sitewide Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    B - PPRP Closure Letter Hanford Sitewide Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis 2014 B.1 Appendix B PPRP Closure Letter 2014 Hanford Sitewide Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis...

  4. Elastic-Wavefield Seismic Stratigraphy: A New Seismic Imaging Technology

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bob A. Hardage; Milo M. Backus; Michael V. DeAngelo; Sergey Fomel; Khaled Fouad; Robert J. Graebner; Paul E. Murray; Randy Remington; Diana Sava

    2006-07-31

    The purpose of our research has been to develop and demonstrate a seismic technology that will provide the oil and gas industry a better methodology for understanding reservoir and seal architectures and for improving interpretations of hydrocarbon systems. Our research goal was to expand the valuable science of seismic stratigraphy beyond the constraints of compressional (P-P) seismic data by using all modes (P-P, P-SV, SH-SH, SV-SV, SV-P) of a seismic elastic wavefield to define depositional sequences and facies. Our objective was to demonstrate that one or more modes of an elastic wavefield may image stratal surfaces across some stratigraphic intervals that are not seen by companion wave modes and thus provide different, but equally valid, information regarding depositional sequences and sedimentary facies within that interval. We use the term elastic wavefield stratigraphy to describe the methodology we use to integrate seismic sequences and seismic facies from all modes of an elastic wavefield into a seismic interpretation. We interpreted both onshore and marine multicomponent seismic surveys to select the data examples that we use to document the principles of elastic wavefield stratigraphy. We have also used examples from published papers that illustrate some concepts better than did the multicomponent seismic data that were available for our analysis. In each interpretation study, we used rock physics modeling to explain how and why certain geological conditions caused differences in P and S reflectivities that resulted in P-wave seismic sequences and facies being different from depth-equivalent S-wave sequences and facies across the targets we studied.

  5. Seismic Data Gathering and Validation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Coleman, Justin

    2015-02-01

    Three recent earthquakes in the last seven years have exceeded their design basis earthquake values (so it is implied that damage to SSCs should have occurred). These seismic events were recorded at North Anna (August 2011, detailed information provided in [Virginia Electric and Power Company Memo]), Fukushima Daichii and Daini (March 2011 [TEPCO 1]), and Kaswazaki-Kariwa (2007, [TEPCO 2]). However, seismic walk downs at some of these plants indicate that very little damage occurred to safety class systems and components due to the seismic motion. This report presents seismic data gathered for two of the three events mentioned above and recommends a path for using that data for two purposes. One purpose is to determine what margins exist in current industry standard seismic soil-structure interaction (SSI) tools. The second purpose is the use the data to validated seismic site response tools and SSI tools. The gathered data represents free field soil and in-structure acceleration time histories data. Gathered data also includes elastic and dynamic soil properties and structural drawings. Gathering data and comparing with existing models has potential to identify areas of uncertainty that should be removed from current seismic analysis and SPRA approaches. Removing uncertainty (to the extent possible) from SPRAs will allow NPP owners to make decisions on where to reduce risk. Once a realistic understanding of seismic response is established for a nuclear power plant (NPP) then decisions on needed protective measures, such as SI, can be made.

  6. ,"Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet)",1,"Monthly","122013" ,"Release Date:","2292016" ,"Next Release Date:","3312016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1160sok2m.xls" ,"Available from ...

  7. Seismic event classification system

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Dowla, Farid U.; Jarpe, Stephen P.; Maurer, William

    1994-01-01

    In the computer interpretation of seismic data, the critical first step is to identify the general class of an unknown event. For example, the classification might be: teleseismic, regional, local, vehicular, or noise. Self-organizing neural networks (SONNs) can be used for classifying such events. Both Kohonen and Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) SONNs are useful for this purpose. Given the detection of a seismic event and the corresponding signal, computation is made of: the time-frequency distribution, its binary representation, and finally a shift-invariant representation, which is the magnitude of the two-dimensional Fourier transform (2-D FFT) of the binary time-frequency distribution. This pre-processed input is fed into the SONNs. These neural networks are able to group events that look similar. The ART SONN has an advantage in classifying the event because the types of cluster groups do not need to be pre-defined. The results from the SONNs together with an expert seismologist's classification are then used to derive event classification probabilities.

  8. Seismic event classification system

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Dowla, F.U.; Jarpe, S.P.; Maurer, W.

    1994-12-13

    In the computer interpretation of seismic data, the critical first step is to identify the general class of an unknown event. For example, the classification might be: teleseismic, regional, local, vehicular, or noise. Self-organizing neural networks (SONNs) can be used for classifying such events. Both Kohonen and Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) SONNs are useful for this purpose. Given the detection of a seismic event and the corresponding signal, computation is made of: the time-frequency distribution, its binary representation, and finally a shift-invariant representation, which is the magnitude of the two-dimensional Fourier transform (2-D FFT) of the binary time-frequency distribution. This pre-processed input is fed into the SONNs. These neural networks are able to group events that look similar. The ART SONN has an advantage in classifying the event because the types of cluster groups do not need to be pre-defined. The results from the SONNs together with an expert seismologist's classification are then used to derive event classification probabilities. 21 figures.

  9. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. Refi ner wholesale petroleum product prices Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-782A, "Refi ners'/Gas Plant Operators' Monthly Petroleum Product Sales Report." So o our ur ur urce c c c : U. U S. S E Ene nerg rg g g gy y In Info fo o o orm rmat at t t tio ion n Ad Ad A A A mi mini ni n n st stra rati ti t t t on on, Fo Fo F F rm rm E EIA IA-7 -7 7 7 782 82A, A, , , , "Re Refi fi fi fine ners rs'/ / / / /Ga Gas s Pl Plan ant t t t Op Oper er e e at ator

  10. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. refi ner reformulated motor gasoline prices by grade and sales type dollars per gallon excluding taxes Year month Regular Midgrade Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Through retail outlets Average[a] DTW Rack Bulk Average Through retail outlets Average[a] DTW Rack Bulk Average 1994 0.764 0.758 0.720 0.569 0.543 0.638 0.879 0.873 0.770 0.628 W 0.728 1995 0.749 0.744 0.707 0.605 0.573 0.650 0.836 0.833 0.753 0.651 - 0.723 1996 0.834 0.830 0.788 0.698 0.677

  11. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. refi ner residual fuel oil prices dollars per gallon excluding taxes Year month Sulfur less than or equal to 1% Sulfur greater than 1% Average Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale 1985 0.644 0.610 0.582 0.560 0.610 0.577 1986 0.372 0.328 0.317 0.289 0.343 0.305 1987 0.447 0.412 0.396 0.362 0.423 0.385 1988 0.372 0.333 0.300 0.271 0.334 0.300 1989 0.436 0.407 0.344 0.331 0.385 0.360 1990 0.505 0.472 0.400 0.372 0.444

  12. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    9. Domes c crude oil fi rst purchase prices for selected crude streams dollars per barrel Year month Alaska North Slope California Kern River California Midway-Sunset Heavy Louisiana Sweet Louisiana Light Sweet Mars Blend West Texas Intermediate West Texas Sour Wyoming Sweet 1994 9.77 11.65 11.79 - - - 15.65 14.16 - 1995 11.12 13.59 13.37 - - - 17.03 15.52 - 1996 15.32 15.97 15.70 - - - 20.96 19.49 - 1997 14.84 15.02 14.88 - - - 19.27 17.77 - 1998 8.47 8.59 8.48 - - - 12.89 11.50 - 1999 12.46

  13. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    F.O.B.[a] costs of imported crude oil for selected crude streams dollars per barrel Year quarter month Canadian Lloydminster Iraqi Basrah Light Mexican Mayan Nigerian Qua Iboe Venezuelan Merey 1995 14.44 - 14.37 - - 1996 17.14 - 17.43 - - 1997 14.29 - 14.97 - - 1998 9.18 - 8.75 - - 1999 15.19 - 14.20 - - 2000 22.94 - 23.31 - - 2001 16.77 - 16.83 - - 2002 20.79 - 20.79 - - 2003 W - 24.14 - - 2004 29.31 - 30.11 - - 2005 35.13 - 40.69 - - 2006 44.55 - 51.29 - - 2007 48.54 - 59.96 - - 2008 79.33 -

  14. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Landed costs of imported crude oil for selected crude streams dollars per barrel Year quarter month Algerian Saharan Blend Brazilian Marlim Canadian Bow River Heavy Canadian Light Sour Blend Canadian Lloydminster 1995 - - 15.77 - 15.56 1996 - - 19.18 - 18.50 1997 - - 16.46 - 15.72 1998 - - 10.41 - 10.15 1999 - - 16.02 - 16.16 2000 - - 23.96 - 23.75 2001 - - 17.93 - 17.26 2002 - - 21.23 - 20.71 2003 - - 25.10 - 24.18 2004 - - 30.88 - 30.54 2005 - - 39.22 - 37.59 2006 - - 48.38 - 46.96 2007 - -

  15. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Refi ner prices of avia on fuels and kerosene by PAD District and state dollars per gallon excluding taxes Geographic area month Avia on gasoline Kerosene-type jet fuel Kerosene Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale United States December 2015 W 2.252 1.233 1.207 W 1.261 November 2015 W 2.385 1.424 1.400 W 1.554 December 2014 W 2.635 2.028 1.998 W 2.195 PAD District 1 December 2015 W 2.241 1.231 1.223 W 1.372 November 2015 W

  16. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    U.S. refi ner conven onal motor gasoline prices by grade and sales type dollars per gallon excluding taxes Year month Regular Midgrade Sales to end users Sales for resale Sales to end users Sales for resale Through retail outlets Average[a] DTW Rack Bulk Average Through retail outlets Average[a] DTW Rack Bulk Average 1994 0.687 0.681 0.636 0.545 0.500 0.558 0.784 0.778 0.694 NA NA 0.627 1995 0.710 0.704 0.651 0.570 0.525 0.573 0.800 0.794 0.711 0.610 NA 0.637 1996 0.797 0.791 0.743 0.665 0.607

  17. Prompt-Month Energy Futures

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Prompt-Month Energy Futures Prices and trading activity shown are for prompt-month (see definition below) futures contracts for the energy commodities listed in the table below. Note that trading for prompt-month futures contracts ends on different dates at the end of the month for the various commodities; therefore, some commodity prices may reference delivery for the next month sooner than other commodity prices. Product Description Listed With Crude Oil ($/barrel) West Texas Intermediate

  18. Microsoft Word - Minutes from March 2009 seismic LL panel 5-11-09.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    A focus of the fourth workshop was identifying specific steps that DOE can take in the coming months to improve DOE's project management as it relates to seismic design. One such action was developing questions for appropriate EM Standard Review Plan (SRP) modules that will lead projects to consider seismic hazard characterization earlier in the process, engage peer review teams at multiple steps in the design process, and ensure that facility and component design proceeds in a logical manner

  19. Petroleum supply monthly

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-10-01

    The Petroleum Supply Monthly (PSM) is one of a family of four publications produced by the Petroleum Supply Division within the Energy Information Administration (EIA) reflecting different levels of data timeliness and completeness. The other publications are the Weekly Petroleum Status Report (WPSR), the Winter Fuels Report, and the Petroleum Supply Annual (PSA). Data presented in the PSM describe the supply and disposition of petroleum products in the United States and major US geographic regions. The data series describe production, imports and exports, inter-Petroleum Administration for Defense (PAD) District movements, and inventories by the primary suppliers of petroleum products in the United States (50 States and the District of Columbia). The reporting universe includes those petroleum sectors in primary supply. Included are: petroleum refiners, motor gasoline blends, operators of natural gas processing plants and fractionators, inter-PAD transporters, importers, and major inventory holders of petroleum products and crude oil. When aggregated, the data reported by these sectors approximately represent the consumption of petroleum products in the United States.

  20. Petroleum Supply Monthly

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-02-01

    The Petroleum Supply Monthly (PSM) is one of a family of four publications produced by the Petroleum Supply Division within the Energy Information Administration (EIA) reflecting different levels of data timeliness and completeness. The other publications are the Weekly Petroleum Status Report (WPSR), the Winter Fuels Report, and the Petroleum Supply Annual (PSA). Data presented in the PSM describe the supply and disposition of petroleum products in the United States and major U.S. geographic regions. The data series describe production, imports and exports, inter-Petroleum Administration for Defense (PAD) District movements, and inventories by the primary suppliers of petroleum products in the United States (50 States and the District of Columbia). The reporting universe includes those petroleum sectors in primary supply. Included are: petroleum refiners, motor gasoline blenders, operators of natural gas processing plants and fractionators, inter-PAD transporters, importers, and major inventory holders of petroleum products and crude oil. When aggregated, the data reported by these sectors approximately represent the consumption of petroleum products in the United States. Data presented in the PSM are divided into two sections: Summary Statistics and Detailed Statistics.

  1. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Domes c crude oil fi rst purchase prices dollars per barrel Year month U.S. Average PAD District 1 PAD District 2 U.S. Average Less AK North Slope Average NY PA WV Average IL IN KS KY MI NE 1990 20.03 21.57 22.06 23.32 23.00 22.16 22.88 23.36 23.46 23.21 23.20 22.92 21.94 1991 16.54 18.16 19.01 19.67 19.48 W 19.58 20.19 20.20 19.84 19.84 19.88 18.78 1992 15.99 17.38 18.52 19.05 19.01 18.09 18.63 19.26 19.27 18.50 18.75 18.99 17.51 1993 14.25 15.31 17.28 17.20 17.53 16.76 16.27 16.97 16.97 15.95

  2. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Domes c crude oil fi rst purchase prices by API gravity dollars per barrel Year month 20.0 or less 20.1 to 25.0 25.1 to 30.0 30.1 to 35.0 35.1 to 40.0 40.1 or greater 1996 16.01 18.61 15.35 19.97 20.23 20.91 1997 15.44 16.27 14.87 18.38 18.62 19.26 1998 9.22 9.62 8.50 12.03 12.17 12.80 1999 14.00 15.30 12.50 16.92 17.18 17.64 2000 24.42 25.64 23.64 28.10 28.36 29.09 2001 19.53 19.59 18.18 23.31 23.99 24.43 2002 21.08 20.80 19.39 23.62 23.94 24.26 2003 25.82 25.56 23.80 28.77 29.21 29.66 2004

  3. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    F.O.B.[a] costs of imported crude oil by selected country dollars per barrel Year month Selected countries Persian Gulf[b] Total OPEC[c] Non OPEC Angola Colombia Mexico Nigeria Saudi Arabia United Kingdom Venezuela 1990 20.23 20.75 19.26 22.46 20.36 23.43 19.55 18.54 20.40 20.32 1991 18.47 18.49 15.37 20.29 14.62 20.81 14.91 15.22 16.99 16.77 1992 18.41 18.02 15.26 19.98 15.85 19.61 14.39 16.35 16.87 16.66 1993 16.23 15.87 13.74 17.79 13.77 16.64 12.46 14.21 14.78 14.65 1994 15.40 14.99 13.68

  4. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Landed costs of imported crude oil by selected country dollars per barrel Year month Selected countries Persian Gulf[a] Total OPEC[b] Non OPEC Angola Canada Colombia Mexico Nigeria Saudi Arabia United Kingdom Venezuela 1990 21.51 20.48 22.34 19.64 23.33 21.82 22.65 20.31 20.55 21.23 20.98 1991 19.90 17.16 19.55 15.89 21.39 17.22 21.37 15.92 17.34 18.08 17.93 1992 19.36 17.04 18.46 15.60 20.78 17.48 20.63 15.13 17.58 17.81 17.67 1993 17.40 15.27 16.54 14.11 18.73 15.40 17.92 13.39 15.26 15.68

  5. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    F.O.B.[a] costs of imported crude oil by API gravity dollars per barrel Year month 20.0 or less 20.1 to 25.0 25.1 to 30.0 30.1 to 35.0 35.1 to 40.0 40.1 to 45.0 45.1 or greater 1990 15.98 18.00 20.54 20.77 22.19 22.78 22.28 1991 11.91 13.72 16.33 17.67 20.15 19.69 20.85 1992 11.83 13.96 16.74 18.02 19.50 19.58 20.05 1993 11.33 12.22 15.14 15.44 17.04 17.53 17.61 1994 11.43 12.19 14.45 14.93 15.91 15.70 16.11 1995 13.35 13.93 16.14 16.19 17.25 17.30 17.32 1996 16.01 17.26 19.90 20.04 21.20 21.00

  6. Petroleum Marketing Monthly

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Landed costs of imported crude oil by API gravity dollars per barrel Year month 20.0 or less 20.1 to 25.0 25.1 to 30.0 30.1 to 35.0 35.1 to 40.0 40.1 to 45.0 45.1 or greater 1990 16.82 18.54 21.59 21.18 22.47 23.47 23.41 1991 13.06 14.41 17.17 18.65 20.86 20.88 22.15 1992 12.89 14.58 17.39 18.50 20.11 20.55 20.95 1993 12.44 12.96 15.72 16.06 17.88 18.38 18.22 1994 12.42 12.93 15.10 15.61 16.65 16.64 16.91 1995 14.43 14.81 16.84 17.13 17.96 18.17 17.90 1996 17.18 18.11 20.53 20.87 21.74 21.71

  7. Downhole hydraulic seismic generator

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Gregory, Danny L. (Corrales, NM); Hardee, Harry C. (Albuquerque, NM); Smallwood, David O. (Albuquerque, NM)

    1992-01-01

    A downhole hydraulic seismic generator system for transmitting energy wave vibrations into earth strata surrounding a borehole. The system contains an elongated, unitary housing operably connected to a well head aboveground by support and electrical cabling, and contains clamping apparatus for selectively clamping the housing to the walls of the borehole. The system further comprises a hydraulic oscillator containing a double-actuating piston whose movement is controlled by an electro-servovalve regulating a high pressure hydraulic fluid flow into and out of upper and lower chambers surrounding the piston. The spent hydraulic fluid from the hydraulic oscillator is stored and pumped back into the system to provide high pressure fluid for conducting another run at the same, or a different location within the borehole.

  8. SEISMIC ANALYSIS FOR PRECLOSURE SAFETY

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    E.N. Lindner

    2004-12-03

    The purpose of this seismic preclosure safety analysis is to identify the potential seismically-initiated event sequences associated with preclosure operations of the repository at Yucca Mountain and assign appropriate design bases to provide assurance of achieving the performance objectives specified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 10 CFR Part 63 for radiological consequences. This seismic preclosure safety analysis is performed in support of the License Application for the Yucca Mountain Project. In more detail, this analysis identifies the systems, structures, and components (SSCs) that are subject to seismic design bases. This analysis assigns one of two design basis ground motion (DBGM) levels, DBGM-1 or DBGM-2, to SSCs important to safety (ITS) that are credited in the prevention or mitigation of seismically-initiated event sequences. An application of seismic margins approach is also demonstrated for SSCs assigned to DBGM-2 by showing a high confidence of a low probability of failure at a higher ground acceleration value, termed a beyond-design basis ground motion (BDBGM) level. The objective of this analysis is to meet the performance requirements of 10 CFR 63.111(a) and 10 CFR 63.111(b) for offsite and worker doses. The results of this calculation are used as inputs to the following: (1) A classification analysis of SSCs ITS by identifying potential seismically-initiated failures (loss of safety function) that could lead to undesired consequences; (2) An assignment of either DBGM-1 or DBGM-2 to each SSC ITS credited in the prevention or mitigation of a seismically-initiated event sequence; and (3) A nuclear safety design basis report that will state the seismic design requirements that are credited in this analysis. The present analysis reflects the design information available as of October 2004 and is considered preliminary. The evolving design of the repository will be re-evaluated periodically to ensure that seismic hazards are properly evaluated and identified. This document supersedes the seismic classifications, assignments, and computations in ''Seismic Analysis for Preclosure Safety'' (BSC 2004a).

  9. Seismicity and seismic stress in the Coso Range, Coso geothermal...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    and seismic stress in the Coso Range, Coso geothermal field, and Indian Wells Valley region, Southeast-Central California Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to...

  10. Advanced Seismic While Drilling System

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Robert Radtke; John Fontenot; David Glowka; Robert Stokes; Jeffery Sutherland; Ron Evans; Jim Musser

    2008-06-30

    A breakthrough has been discovered for controlling seismic sources to generate selectable low frequencies. Conventional seismic sources, including sparkers, rotary mechanical, hydraulic, air guns, and explosives, by their very nature produce high-frequencies. This is counter to the need for long signal transmission through rock. The patent pending SeismicPULSER{trademark} methodology has been developed for controlling otherwise high-frequency seismic sources to generate selectable low-frequency peak spectra applicable to many seismic applications. Specifically, we have demonstrated the application of a low-frequency sparker source which can be incorporated into a drill bit for Drill Bit Seismic While Drilling (SWD). To create the methodology of a controllable low-frequency sparker seismic source, it was necessary to learn how to maximize sparker efficiencies to couple to, and transmit through, rock with the study of sparker designs and mechanisms for (a) coupling the sparker-generated gas bubble expansion and contraction to the rock, (b) the effects of fluid properties and dynamics, (c) linear and non-linear acoustics, and (d) imparted force directionality. After extensive seismic modeling, the design of high-efficiency sparkers, laboratory high frequency sparker testing, and field tests were performed at the University of Texas Devine seismic test site. The conclusion of the field test was that extremely high power levels would be required to have the range required for deep, 15,000+ ft, high-temperature, high-pressure (HTHP) wells. Thereafter, more modeling and laboratory testing led to the discovery of a method to control a sparker that could generate low frequencies required for deep wells. The low frequency sparker was successfully tested at the Department of Energy Rocky Mountain Oilfield Test Center (DOE RMOTC) field test site in Casper, Wyoming. An 8-in diameter by 26-ft long SeismicPULSER{trademark} drill string tool was designed and manufactured by TII. An APS Turbine Alternator powered the SeismicPULSER{trademark} to produce two Hz frequency peak signals repeated every 20 seconds. Since the ION Geophysical, Inc. (ION) seismic survey surface recording system was designed to detect a minimum downhole signal of three Hz, successful performance was confirmed with a 5.3 Hz recording with the pumps running. The two Hz signal generated by the sparker was modulated with the 3.3 Hz signal produced by the mud pumps to create an intense 5.3 Hz peak frequency signal. The low frequency sparker source is ultimately capable of generating selectable peak frequencies of 1 to 40 Hz with high-frequency spectra content to 10 kHz. The lower frequencies and, perhaps, low-frequency sweeps, are needed to achieve sufficient range and resolution for realtime imaging in deep (15,000 ft+), high-temperature (150 C) wells for (a) geosteering, (b) accurate seismic hole depth, (c) accurate pore pressure determinations ahead of the bit, (d) near wellbore diagnostics with a downhole receiver and wired drill pipe, and (e) reservoir model verification. Furthermore, the pressure of the sparker bubble will disintegrate rock resulting in an increased overall rates of penetration. Other applications for the SeismicPULSER{trademark} technology are to deploy a low-frequency source for greater range on a wireline for Reverse Vertical Seismic Profiling (RVSP) and Cross-Well Tomography. Commercialization of the technology is being undertaken by first contacting stakeholders to define the value proposition for rig site services utilizing SeismicPULSER{trademark} technologies. Stakeholders include national oil companies, independent oil companies, independents, service companies, and commercial investors. Service companies will introduce a new Drill Bit SWD service for deep HTHP wells. Collaboration will be encouraged between stakeholders in the form of joint industry projects to develop prototype tools and initial field trials. No barriers have been identified for developing, utilizing, and exploiting the low-frequency SeismicPULSER{trademark} source in a

  11. Seismic Design Expectations Report | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Seismic Design Expectations Report Seismic Design Expectations Report The Seismic Design Expectations Report (SDER) is a tool that assists DOE federal project review teams in evaluating the technical sufficiency of the project seismic design activities prior to Critical Decision (CD) approvals at CD-0, CD-1, CD-2, CD-3 and CD-4. PDF icon Seismic Design Expectations Report More Documents & Publications Natural Phenomena Hazards DOE-STD 1020-2012 & DOE Handbook DOE-STD-1020-2012 DOE

  12. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1989" ,"Data 2","Production",10,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1989" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",7,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1990" ,"Data 4","Consumption",6,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1989" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016"

  13. Monthly Energy Review - November 2000

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    November 2000 www.eia.doe.gov Energy Information Administration On the Web at: www.eia.doe.govmer Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the...

  14. National Safety Month- June 2013

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    National Safety Month is recognized by employers, employees, and safety and health professionals throughout the country. During the month of June, HSS provided information, activities, and events pertaining to weekly themes.

  15. Seismic Techniques | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    impedance boundary7 References (Majer, n.d.) "3-D Seismic Methods For Geothermal Reservoir Exploration and Assessment- Summary" 2.0 2.1 2.2 (Dobrin and Savit, 1988)...

  16. Training toward Advanced 3D Seismic Methods for CO2 Monitoring, Verification, and Accounting

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Christopher Liner

    2012-05-31

    The objective of our work is graduate and undergraduate student training related to improved 3D seismic technology that addresses key challenges related to monitoring movement and containment of CO{sub 2}, specifically better quantification and sensitivity for mapping of caprock integrity, fractures, and other potential leakage pathways. We utilize data and results developed through previous DOE-funded CO{sub 2} characterization project (DE-FG26-06NT42734) at the Dickman Field of Ness County, KS. Dickman is a type locality for the geology that will be encountered for CO{sub 2} sequestration projects from northern Oklahoma across the U.S. midcontinent to Indiana and Illinois. Since its discovery in 1962, the Dickman Field has produced about 1.7 million barrels of oil from porous Mississippian carbonates with a small structural closure at about 4400 ft drilling depth. Project data includes 3.3 square miles of 3D seismic data, 142 wells, with log, some core, and oil/water production data available. Only two wells penetrate the deep saline aquifer. In a previous DOE-funded project, geological and seismic data were integrated to create a geological property model and a flow simulation grid. We believe that sequestration of CO{sub 2} will largely occur in areas of relatively flat geology and simple near surface, similar to Dickman. The challenge is not complex geology, but development of improved, lower-cost methods for detecting natural fractures and subtle faults. Our project used numerical simulation to test methods of gathering multicomponent, full azimuth data ideal for this purpose. Our specific objectives were to apply advanced seismic methods to aide in quantifying reservoir properties and lateral continuity of CO{sub 2} sequestration targets. The purpose of the current project is graduate and undergraduate student training related to improved 3D seismic technology that addresses key challenges related to monitoring movement and containment of CO{sub 2}, specifically better quantification and sensitivity for mapping of caprock integrity, fractures, and other potential leakage pathways. Specifically, our focus is fundamental research on (1) innovative narrow-band seismic data decomposition and interpretation, and (2) numerical simulation of advanced seismic data (multi-component, high density, full azimuth data) ideal for mapping of cap rock integrity and potential leakage pathways.

  17. Monthly Project Bulletin: August 2012

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This document contains the Guidelines for Home Energy Professionals Project bulletin for the month of August 2012.

  18. Monthly Project Bulletin: October 2012

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This document contains the Guidelines for Home Energy Professionals Project bulletin for the month of September 2012.

  19. Down hole periodic seismic generator

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Hardee, Harry C. (Albuquerque, NM); Hills, Richard G. (Las Cruces, NM); Striker, Richard P. (Albuquerque, NM)

    1989-01-01

    A down hole periodic seismic generator system for transmitting variable frequency, predominantly shear-wave vibration into earth strata surrounding a borehole. The system comprises a unitary housing operably connected to a well head by support and electrical cabling and contains clamping apparatus for selectively clamping the housing to the walls of the borehole. The system further comprises a variable speed pneumatic oscillator and a self-contained pneumatic reservoir for producing a frequency-swept seismic output over a discrete frequency range.

  20. Advanced downhole periodic seismic generator

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Hardee, Harry C. (Albuquerque, NM); Hills, Richard G. (Las Cruces, NM); Striker, Richard P. (Albuquerque, NM)

    1991-07-16

    An advanced downhole periodic seismic generator system for transmitting variable frequency, predominantly shear-wave vibration into earth strata surrounding a borehole. The system comprises a unitary housing operably connected to a well head by support and electrical cabling and contains clamping apparatus for selectively clamping the housing to the walls of the borehole. The system further comprises a variable speed pneumatic oscillator and a self-contained pneumatic reservoir for producing a frequency-swept seismic output over a discrete frequency range.