Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Nuclear Safety Workshop Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Workshop Summary Workshop Summary September 19-20, 2012 1 Nuclear Safety Workshop Summary On September 19-20, 2012, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) held a second Nuclear Safety Workshop covering the results of the Department's actions to improve its posture for analyzing and responding to severe accidents in light of lessons learned from the March 2011 nuclear accident in Japan. Sponsored by DOE and championed by Deputy Secretary of Energy Daniel Poneman, the two-day workshop discussed the lessons learned in a national and international context. The workshop's theme

2

,"Missouri Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Gas Wells (MMcf)","Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells (MMcf)","Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)","Missouri Natural...

3

,"Missouri Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Gas Sold to Commercial Consumers (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Missouri Natural Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Missouri Natural Gas Price Sold to...

4

,"Mississippi Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

"N3050MS3","N3010MS3","N3020MS3","N3035MS3","NA1570SMS3","N3045MS3" "Date","Mississippi Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Mississippi Natural Gas...

5

,"Connecticut Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3","N3010CT3","N3020CT3","N3035CT3","N3045CT3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Connecticut (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Connecticut Price of Natural Gas Delivered to...

6

,"California Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 7","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

7

,"Maryland Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1999" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",10,"Annual",2013,...

8

,"Georgia Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1999" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6301974" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2013,"...

9

,"Massachusetts Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6301967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2013,"...

10

,"Oregon Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1979" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301973" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2013,...

11

,"Texas Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",1,"Annual",2013,"6302012" ,"Data 7","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

12

,"Washington Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",9,"Annual",2013,"...

13

,"Nebraska Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

14

,"Pennsylvania Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

15

,"Alaska Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",6,"Annual",2013,"6301973" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301969" ,"Data 7","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

16

,"Maine Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2013,"6301982" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301981" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2013,"...

17

,"Minnesota Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301973" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2013,"...

18

,"Idaho Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",2,"Annual",1975,"6301974" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301981" ,"Data 5","Consumption",9,"Annual",2013,"...

19

,"Wisconsin Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6301973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2013,"...

20

,"Louisiana Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 7","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

,"Delaware Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6301967" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",9,"Annual",2013,"...

22

,"Colorado Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",2,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

23

,"Tennessee Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301968" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

24

,"Arkansas Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

25

,"Nevada Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

301967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2013,"6301991" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301982" ,"Data 4","Consumption",10,"Annual",2013,...

26

,"Connecticut Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6301973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2013,"...

27

,"Virginia Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",10,"Annual",2013,...

28

,"Alabama Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301968" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

29

,"Indiana Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2013,...

30

,"Kansas Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

S3","N3050KS3","N3010KS3","N3020KS3","N3035KS3","NA1570SKS3","N3045KS3" "Date","Kansas Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Kansas Natural Gas Pipeline...

31

,"Wyoming Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3","N3050WY3","N3010WY3","N3020WY3","N3035WY3","NA1570SWY3","N3045WY3" "Date","Wyoming Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Wyoming Natural Gas...

32

,"Montana Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3","N3050MT3","N3010MT3","N3020MT3","N3035MT3","NA1570SMT3","N3045MT3" "Date","Montana Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Montana Natural Gas Imports...

33

,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3","N3050OK3","N3010OK3","N3020OK3","N3035OK3","NA1570SOK3","N3045OK3" "Date","Oklahoma Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Oklahoma Natural Gas...

34

,"Michigan Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3","N3050MI3","N3010MI3","N3020MI3","N3035MI3","NA1570SMI3","N3045MI3" "Date","Michigan Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Michigan Natural Gas...

35

,"Vermont Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3","NA1480SVT3","N3050VT3","N3010VT3","N3020VT3","N3035VT3","N3045VT3" "Date","Vermont Natural Gas Imports Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Vermont Natural Gas Pipeline...

36

,"Arizona Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3","N3050AZ3","N3010AZ3","N3020AZ3","N3035AZ3","NA1570SAZ3","N3045AZ3" "Date","Arizona Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Price of Arizona Natural...

37

,"Florida Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3","N3050FL3","N3010FL3","N3020FL3","N3035FL3","NA1570SFL3","N3045FL3" "Date","Florida Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Florida Natural Gas...

38

,"Kentucky Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3","N3050KY3","N3010KY3","N3020KY3","N3035KY3","NA1570SKY3","N3045KY3" "Date","Kentucky Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Kentucky Natural Gas...

39

,"Ohio Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

SOH3","N3050OH3","N3010OH3","N3020OH3","N3035OH3","NA1570SOH3","N3045OH3" "Date","Ohio Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Ohio Natural Gas Pipeline...

40

,"Utah Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

SUT3","N3050UT3","N3010UT3","N3020UT3","N3035UT3","NA1570SUT3","N3045UT3" "Date","Utah Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Utah Natural Gas Pipeline...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

,"Kentucky Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050KY3","N3010KY3","N3020KY3","N3035KY3","N3045KY3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Kentucky (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Kentucky Price...

42

,"Colorado Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050CO3","N3010CO3","N3020CO3","N3035CO3","N3045CO3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Colorado (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Colorado Price...

43

,"Illinois Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050IL3","N3010IL3","N3020IL3","N3035IL3","N3045IL3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Illinois (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Illinois Price...

44

,"California Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050CA3","N3010CA3","N3020CA3","N3035CA3","N3045CA3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in California (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","California...

45

,"Maryland Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050MD3","N3010MD3","N3020MD3","N3035MD3","N3045MD3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Maryland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Maryland Price...

46

,"Arkansas Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050AR3","N3010AR3","N3020AR3","N3035AR3","N3045AR3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Arkansas (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Arkansas Price...

47

,"Virginia Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050VA3","N3010VA3","N3020VA3","N3035VA3","N3045VA3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Virginia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Virginia Price...

48

,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050OK3","N3010OK3","N3020OK3","N3035OK3","N3045OK3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Oklahoma (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Oklahoma Price...

49

,"Nebraska Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050NE3","N3010NE3","N3020NE3","N3035NE3","N3045NE3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Nebraska (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Nebraska Price...

50

,"Washington Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050WA3","N3010WA3","N3020WA3","N3035WA3","N3045WA3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Washington (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Washington...

51

,"Tennessee Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050TN3","N3010TN3","N3020TN3","N3035TN3","N3045TN3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Tennessee (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Tennessee...

52

,"Louisiana Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050LA3","N3010LA3","N3020LA3","N3035LA3","N3045LA3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Louisiana (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Louisiana...

53

,"Minnesota Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050MN3","N3010MN3","N3020MN3","N3035MN3","N3045MN3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Minnesota (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Minnesota...

54

,"Michigan Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050MI3","N3010MI3","N3020MI3","N3035MI3","N3045MI3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Michigan (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Michigan Price...

55

,"Pennsylvania Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050PA3","N3010PA3","N3020PA3","N3035PA3","N3045PA3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Pennsylvania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic...

56

,"Utah Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050UT3","N3010UT3","N3020UT3","N3035UT3","N3045UT3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Utah (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Utah Price of...

57

,"Ohio Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050OH3","N3010OH3","N3020OH3","N3035OH3","N3045OH3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Ohio (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Ohio Price of...

58

,"Iowa Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050IA3","N3010IA3","N3020IA3","N3035IA3","N3045IA3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Iowa (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Iowa Price of...

59

Georgia Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Imports Imports 6.79 9.71 3.73 4.39 4.20 2.78 1999-2012 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.15 9.35 6.56 5.93 5.19 4.35 1984-2012 Residential 17.53 18.26 16.30 15.17 15.72 16.23 1967-2012 Commercial 13.21 14.30 11.70 10.95 10.51 9.74 1967-2012 Industrial 8.86 11.02 6.21 6.25 5.90 4.60 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 12.93 12.91 12.11 5.17 5.57 14.51 1993-2012 Electric Power 7.54 10.40 4.70 5.21 4.72 3.40 1997-2012 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 170,243 135,711 142,244 106,454 75,641 59,266 1999-2012 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1974-1975 Withdrawals 1974-1975 Net Withdrawals 1974-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 2,817 4,372 3,182 2,693 3,306 2,097 1980-2012

60

Wisconsin Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Pipeline and Distribution Use Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.04 8.71 6.70 6.14 5.65 4.88 1984-2012 Residential 12.02 12.81 10.76 10.34 9.77 9.27 1967-2012 Commercial 10.36 11.18 8.95 8.53 8.03 7.34 1967-2012 Industrial 9.62 10.57 7.82 7.56 7.05 5.81 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 9.21 11.01 7.19 7.84 6.10 5.71 1989-2012 Electric Power 7.56 9.24 4.83 5.43 4.91 3.27 1997-2012 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1973 Withdrawals 1974-1975 Net Withdrawals 1973-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 148 130 80 63 107 33 1980-2012 Withdrawals 70 79 98 92 87 100 1980-2012 Net Withdrawals 78 51 -18 -29 20 -67 1980-2012 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 398,370 409,377 387,066 372,898 393,734 402,657 1997-2012

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Delaware Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

78-2005 78-2005 Citygate 7.58 8.32 6.54 5.67 9.03 7.19 1984-2012 Residential 16.21 16.07 17.79 15.12 15.38 15.24 1967-2012 Commercial 14.48 14.24 15.87 13.26 13.58 13.31 1967-2012 Industrial 8.93 12.54 13.99 10.18 11.69 11.61 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 21.90 26.48 14.12 24.55 28.76 30.97 1995-2012 Electric Power W W W W W -- 1997-2012 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1967-1975 Withdrawals 1967-1975 Net Withdrawals 1967-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 215 122 121 73 64 117 1980-2012 Withdrawals 220 104 118 76 96 66 1980-2012 Net Withdrawals -6 17 3 -2 -31 51 1980-2012 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 48,155 48,162 50,148 54,825 79,715 101,676 1997-2012 Lease and Plant Fuel

62

Nuclear testing: Executive summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The authors have examined the experimental and analytic bases for understanding the performance of each of the weapon types that are currently planned to remain in the US enduring nuclear stockpile. They have also examined whether continued underground tests at various nuclear yield thresholds would add significantly to the confidence in this stockpile in the years ahead. The starting point for this examination was a detailed review of past experience in developing and testing modern nuclear weapons, their certification and recertification processes, their performance margins, and evidence of aging or other trends over time for each weapon type in the enduring stockpile. The findings, as summarized in Conclusions 1 through 6, are consistent with US agreement to enter into a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) of unending duration, that includes a standard ``supreme national interest`` clause. Recognizing that the challenge of maintaining an effective nuclear stockpile for an indefinite period without benefit of underground tests is an important and also a new one, the US should affirm its readiness to invoke the supreme national interest clause should the need arise as a result of unanticipated technical problems in the enduring stockpile.

Drell, S.; Cornwall, J.; Dyson, F. [and others

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

Summary, Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary, Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development Plan Summary, Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development Plan In 1998, DOE established the Nuclear Energy...

64

Nuclear conflict and ozone depletion Quick summary  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nuclear conflict and ozone depletion Quick summary o Regional nuclear war could cause global which traps pollutants o Nuclear weapons cause explosions, which then causes things around the vicinity to start burning, which in turn releases black carbon; it is not the nuclear material or fallout causing

Toohey, Darin W.

65

Summary Pamphlet, Nuclear Safety at the Department of Energy...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Summary Pamphlet, Nuclear Safety at the Department of Energy Summary Pamphlet, Nuclear Safety at the Department of Energy September 2010 This pamphlet is developed as part of the...

66

Nuclear Safety Workshop Summary | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Workshop Summary Workshop Summary Nuclear Safety Workshop Summary September 19-20, 2012 Nuclear Safety Workshop Summary On September 19-20, 2012, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) held a second Nuclear Safety Workshop covering the results of the Department's actions to improve its posture for analyzing and responding to severe accidents in light of lessons learned from the March 2011 nuclear accident in Japan. Sponsored by DOE and championed by Deputy Secretary of Energy Daniel Poneman, the two-day workshop discussed the lessons learned in a national and international context. The workshop's theme was Post Fukushima Initiatives and Results, and included technical breakout sessions focused on beyond design basis events (BDBEs) analysis and response, safety culture, and risk assessment and management.

67

2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administrat...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and...

68

,"South Dakota Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

301967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301984" ,"Data 4","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

69

,"New Mexico Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",2,"Annual",2013,"6301980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

70

,"West Virginia Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3050WV3","N3010WV3","N3020WV3","N3035WV3","NA1570SWV3","N3045WV3" "Date","West Virginia Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","West Virginia Natural Gas...

71

,"North Dakota Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

N3050ND3","N3010ND3","N3020ND3","N3035ND3","NA1570SND3","N3045ND3" "Date","North Dakota Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","North Dakota Natural Gas...

72

,"New York Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

480SNY3","N3050NY3","N3010NY3","N3020NY3","N3035NY3","NA1570SNY3","N3045NY3" "Date","New York Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","New York Natural...

73

,"New York Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

50NY3","N3010NY3","N3020NY3","N3035NY3","N3045NY3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in New York (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","New York Price of Natural Gas Delivered to...

74

Oklo natural nuclear reactor  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Although the possibility of natural was considered in the 1950s, this prediction was not confirmed until 1972, when a routine analysis of a uranium ore standard at the nuclear-fuel processing plant in Pierre...

Mark J. Rigali; Bartholomew Nagy

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

75

,"New Mexico Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1: Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050NM3","N3010NM3","N3020NM3","N3035NM3","N3045NM3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in New Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","New Mexico...

76

2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

APS-2012-NE.xls More Documents & Publications 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the West Valley Demonstration Project 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security...

77

New Hampshire Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Imports Imports 7.52 9.72 5.04 5.48 5.45 4.08 1999-2012 Exports -- 7.61 -- -- 7.54 2.62 2007-2012 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1980-2005 Citygate 9.71 10.94 9.53 8.83 8.07 7.15 1984-2012 Residential 16.71 16.45 15.33 14.46 14.67 13.74 1980-2012 Commercial 15.42 15.21 14.37 12.72 11.46 11.95 1977-2012 Industrial 13.45 14.37 12.86 11.59 11.57 10.48 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 1994-1995 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2012 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 56,879 39,438 26,767 18,297 19,826 47,451 1982-2012 Exports 0 64 0 0 336 199 2007-2012 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 101 45 82 33 112 65 1980-2012 Withdrawals 103 44 73 35 108 71 1980-2012 Net Withdrawals -2 1 9 -3 4 -6 1973-2012

78

New Jersey Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Pipeline and Distribution Use Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 10.21 11.42 9.15 8.41 7.53 6.74 1984-2012 Residential 14.48 15.21 14.54 12.84 11.78 11.09 1967-2012 Commercial 12.10 13.38 10.20 10.11 9.51 8.50 1967-2012 Industrial 9.63 12.76 8.96 9.63 9.23 7.87 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- -- -- -- 1994-2012 Electric Power 8.17 10.78 5.31 5.66 5.24 3.63 1997-2012 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1967-1996 Withdrawals 1967-1996 Net Withdrawals 1967-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 7,290 5,792 4,919 3,304 5,018 3,483 1980-2012 Withdrawals 5,513 5,971 4,425 3,693 4,404 3,278 1980-2012 Net Withdrawals 1,776 -178 494 -390 613 205 1980-2012 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption

79

Rhode Island Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

10.62 10.07 6.70 10.05 8.22 4.11 1984-2012 10.62 10.07 6.70 10.05 8.22 4.11 1984-2012 Residential 16.66 16.89 17.06 16.48 15.33 14.29 1967-2012 Commercial 14.91 15.53 15.14 14.46 13.33 12.31 1967-2012 Industrial 12.58 13.26 12.58 12.13 10.98 9.78 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 10.96 12.62 10.72 11.71 8.61 16.32 1990-2012 Electric Power 8.06 10.50 4.98 5.45 5.10 3.98 1997-2012 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1996 Withdrawals 1973-1996 Net Withdrawals 1973-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 1,093 656 698 468 430 517 1980-2012 Withdrawals 1,089 730 954 698 436 457 1980-2012 Net Withdrawals 4 -74 -256 -230 -7 60 1980-2012 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 87,972 89,256 92,743 94,110 100,455 95,477 1997-2012

80

North Carolina Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Pipeline and Distribution Use Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.55 10.32 6.44 6.02 5.45 4.00 1984-2012 Residential 15.70 16.58 14.25 12.50 12.55 12.19 1967-2012 Commercial 12.77 14.19 11.63 10.18 9.64 8.62 1967-2012 Industrial 9.98 12.10 8.66 8.24 7.70 6.37 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 10.64 12.79 11.21 9.77 12.13 6.48 1990-2012 Electric Power W 11.13 W W W W 1997-2012 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1996 Withdrawals 1974-1996 Net Withdrawals 1973-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 5,744 4,493 6,838 4,410 5,500 3,504 1980-2012 Withdrawals 5,522 4,490 6,027 7,052 3,305 3,762 1980-2012 Net Withdrawals 222 3 811 -2,643 2,194 -258 1980-2012 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

South Carolina Natural Gas Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View History Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 9.10 10.27 6.70 6.17 5.67 4.57 1984-2012 Residential 17.15 16.84 14.91 13.01 12.93 13.25 1967-2012 Commercial 13.54 14.26 11.16 10.34 9.68 8.67 1967-2012 Industrial 8.84 11.03 6.06 6.12 5.60 4.30 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 10.84 13.30 12.50 11.16 8.85 9.77 1994-2012 Electric Power 8.16 10.48 W W W W 1997-2012 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1975 Withdrawals 1973-1975 Net Withdrawals 1973-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 1,089 1,872 1,283 1,360 1,386 391 1980-2012 Withdrawals 987 1,847 1,268 1,574 1,183 491 1980-2012 Net Withdrawals 102 26 15 -214 204 -100 1980-2012

82

FY 2009 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary |...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing...

83

Nuclear Energy In the United States Executive Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 Status and Outlook for Nuclear Energy In the United States Executive Summary The U.S. nuclear power industry continues to make pro- gress toward the construction of new nuclear...

84

FY 2008 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2008 Sandia Corporation PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2008 Sandia Corporation PER Summary FY 2008 Sandia Corporation PER Summary

85

FY 2007 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2007 Sandia Corporation PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2007 Sandia Corporation PER Summary FY 2007 Sandia Corporation PER Summary

86

FY 2011 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2011 Sandia Corporation PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2011 Sandia Corporation PER Summary FY 2011 Sandia Corporation PER Summary

87

FY 2009 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 Sandia Corporation PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2009 Sandia Corporation PER Summary FY 2009 Sandia Corporation PER Summary

88

B1. Summary Statistics for Natural  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

B1. B1. Summary Statistics for Natural Gas in the United States, Metric Equivalents, 1992-1996 Table 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Reserves (billion cubic meters) Estimated Proved Reserves (dry) as of December 31 ....................................... 4,673 4,599 4,639 4,676 4,714 Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells Producing at End of Year.............................. 275,414 282,152 291,773 298,541 301,811 Production (million cubic meters) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells ......................................... 457,738 472,640 491,327 489,373 500,664 From Oil Wells ........................................... 168,977 170,878 176,404 182,972 180,403 Total.............................................................. 626,716 643,519 667,731 672,345 681,067 Repressuring ................................................ -84,173

89

Nuclear Safety Research and Development Status Workshop Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NSR&D STATUS WORKSHOP SUMMARIES Caroline Garzon Chief of Nuclear Safety Staff NUCLEAR SAFETY R&D Perform a peer review of Risk Assessment Corporation WTP analysis by a team and...

90

Summary of Prometheus Radiation Shielding Nuclear Design Analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report transmits a summary of radiation shielding nuclear design studies performed to support the Prometheus project. Together, the enclosures and references associated with this document describe NRPCT (KAPL & Bettis) shielding nuclear design analyses done for the project.

J. Stephens

2006-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

91

Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, April 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, April 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, April 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, April 2012 April 30, 2012 - 12:31pm Addthis Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary The U.S. NRC voted to approve the issuance of the COLs for Southern Nuclear's Vogtle Units 3 and 4 on February 9, 2012. The issuance marks the first COL ever to be issued and the construction of a new nuclear power plant in more than 30 years. SCE&G's V.C Summer Units 2 and 3 received approval for COLs on March 30, 2012, making them the second US new-build in 30 years. The Tennessee Valley Authority has revised the cost and time estimates of Unit 2 at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. The new schedule estimates the cost to be in the range of $4 billion with a completion date of late 2015. South Mississippi Electric Power Association (SMEPA) has signed a

92

Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, October 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 2012 October 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, October 2012 October 30, 2012 - 8:58am Addthis Quarterly Updates On August 7, NRC issued an order halting issuance of any new construction licenses or license renewals until the Commission can respond to a June 8 court ruling striking down the NRC's waste confidence rule, which assumes that a waste repository will be available "when necessary"; reviews of license applications will continue and the order does not apply to design certifications. On September 6, NRC directed the agency's staff to develop an environmental impact statement (EIS) and a revised waste confidence decision and rule on the temporary storage of spent nuclear fuel. The EIS and rule are to be completed within 24 months. Due to low natural gas prices and unfavorable economic conditions,

93

FY 2011 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2011 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2011 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER

94

FY 2007 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2007 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2007 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER

95

FY 2009 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2009 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER

96

FY 2006 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2006 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2006 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary FY 2006 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary

97

FY 2007 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

7 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security 7 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2007 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2007 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary FY 2007 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary

98

FY 2010 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2010 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2010 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC,

99

FY 2012 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC,

100

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Executive Summary  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Executive Summary Mission As we become more in this new century, the benefits of nuclear fission as a key energy source for both the near- and long method of generating energy from nuclear fission in both the United States and the world. A key mission

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JANUARY 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - April 2014 Page 1 News Updates  Luminant has requested a suspension of the NRC's review of its Comanche Peak Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) application. The company cited impacts to the review schedule of the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries US Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (US- APWR) due to the vendor's desire to refocus its resources to reactor restarts in Japan as well as low electricity prices driven by low natural gas prices as reasons for the suspension.  Unistar Nuclear Operating Co. has formally withdrawn its COL application from the NRC to build and operate Areva's U.S. EPR at its Nine Mile

102

Generating natural language summaries for multimedia  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper we introduce an automatic system that generates textual summaries of Internet-style video clips by first identifying suitable high-level descriptive features that have been detected in the video (e.g. visual concepts, recognized speech, ...

Duo Ding; Florian Metze; Shourabh Rawat; Peter F. Schulam; Susanne Burger

2012-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

,"U.S. Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1973" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2013,"6301935" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2013,"6301969" ,"Data 7","Consumption",11,"Annual",2013,...

104

,"U.S. Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

"N9132US3","N9133US3","N3050US3","N3010US3","N3020US3","N3035US3","N3045US3" "Date","U.S. Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Price of U.S. Natural Gas...

105

Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information Document Markings: A Brief Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information (UCNI) Document Markings: A Brief Summary U.S. Department of Energy Classification Training Institute Office of Quality Management Office of Classification Office of Health, Safety and Security November 2011 Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information (UCNI) Document Markings: A Brief Summary Prepared by: Office of Quality Management Office of Classification U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, D.C. 20585-1290 U C N I This document contains UCNI. How do I mark it? Do I need additional markings if it contains OUO? Table of Contents Marking UCNI Documents and Material .................................................... 1

106

QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) has ruled that Toshiba's participation in Nuclear Innovation North America's South Texas Project does not violate federal rules on...

107

Summary References | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

to C. Chambellan, National Nuclear Security Administration, dated November 8. PNNL 2013a TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority) 2007. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact...

108

Summary: U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Summary: U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves 2009 November 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Oil, Gas, and Coal Supply...

109

Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 January 30, 2012 - 1:10pm Addthis Quarterly News The U.S. NRC voted to approve the amended AP1000 design certification on December 22, 2011. The Commission also announced the rule would be effective immediately after it was published in the Federal Register on December 30, 2011. A final rule for the GE-ABWR design certification amendment was approved and published in the Federal Register on December 16, 2011. The rule will become effective January 17, 2012. The condenser for Vogtle Unit 3 has been completed by Japan's Toshiba and began its journey from Sacheon to Savannah, Georgia on November 21. The condenser marks the first major component Toshiba has shipped for

110

QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY OCTOBER 2014  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

low natural gas prices, financial impacts of cumulative regulations, and the wholesale market structure all contributed to the company's decision to shutter the plant....

111

QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JANUARY 2015  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

low natural gas prices, financial impacts of cumulative regulations, and the wholesale market structure all contributed to the company's decision to shutter the plant....

112

US nuclear power plant operating cost and experience summaries  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

NUREG/CR-6577, U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Operating Cost and Experience Summaries, has been prepared to provide historical operating cost and experience information on U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. Cost incurred after initial construction are characterized as annual production costs, representing fuel and plant operating and maintenance expenses, and capital expenditures related to facility additions/modifications which are included in the plant capital asset base. As discussed in the report, annual data for these two cost categories were obtained from publicly available reports and must be accepted as having different degrees of accuracy and completeness. Treatment of inconclusive and incomplete data is discussed. As an aid to understanding the fluctuations in the cost histories, operating summaries for each nuclear unit are provided. The intent of these summaries is to identify important operating events; refueling, major maintenance, and other significant outages; operating milestones; and significant licensing or enforcement actions. Information used in the summaries is condensed from annual operating reports submitted by the licensees, plant histories contained in Nuclear Power Experience, trade press articles, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) web site (www.nrc.gov).

Kohn, W.E.; Reid, R.L.; White, V.S.

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

U.S. Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 View May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 View History Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Wellhead NA NA NA NA NA NA 1973-2013 Imports 3.95 3.90 3.41 3.17 3.48 3.44 1989-2013 By Pipeline 3.93 3.73 3.37 3.01 3.01 3.38 1997-2013 As Liquefied Natural Gas 4.51 8.65 4.59 7.42 9.96 5.79 1997-2013 Exports 4.38 4.22 3.94 3.75 3.88 3.88 1989-2013 By Pipeline 4.37 4.22 3.93 3.75 3.88 3.88 1997-2013 As Liquefied Natural Gas 12.84 13.38 12.89 13.25 13.53 13.09 1997-2013 Citygate 5.54 5.74 5.53 5.23 5.20 4.88 1973-2013 Residential 12.61 14.97 16.30 16.44 15.69 12.48 1973-2013 Commercial 8.75 9.09 8.99 9.07 8.80 8.34 1973-2013 Industrial 5.03 4.91 4.50 4.34 4.38 4.39 2001-2013 Electric Power 4.79 4.56 4.34 4.03 4.19 4.26 2002-2013

114

U.S. Natural Gas Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Prices Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Wellhead 6.25 7.97 3.67 4.48 3.95 2.66 1922-2012 Imports 6.87 8.70 4.19 4.52 4.24 2.88 1985-2012 By Pipeline 6.83 8.57 4.13 4.46 4.09 2.79 1985-2012 As Liquefied Natural Gas 7.07 10.03 4.59 4.94 5.63 4.27 1985-2012 Exports 6.92 8.58 4.47 5.02 4.64 3.25 1985-2012 By Pipeline 6.96 8.62 4.34 4.75 4.35 3.08 1985-2012 As Liquefied Natural Gas 6.23 7.69 8.40 9.53 10.54 12.82 1985-2012 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.16 9.18 6.48 6.18 5.63 4.73 1973-2012 Residential 13.08 13.89 12.14 11.39 11.03 10.71 1967-2012 Commercial 11.34 12.23 10.06 9.47 8.91 8.10 1967-2012 Industrial 7.68 9.65 5.33 5.49 5.13 3.89 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 8.50 11.75 8.13 6.25 7.48 8.04 1989-2012

115

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook EIA Home > Natural Gas > Natural Gas Weekly Update Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook This summary is based on the most recent Short-Term Energy Outlook released May 6, 2002. EIA projects that natural gas wellhead prices will average $2.73 per MMBtu in 2002 compared with about $4.00 per MMBtu last year (Short-Term Energy Outlook, May 2002). This projection reflects the sharp increases in spot and near-term futures prices in recent weeks. Average wellhead prices have risen 38 percent from $2.14 per MMBtu in February to an estimated $2.96 in April. Spot prices at the Henry Hub have increased to an even greater extent, rising more than $1.50 per MMBtu since early February. The upward price trend reflects a number of influences, such as unusual weather patterns that have led to increased gas consumption, and tensions in the Middle East and rising crude oil prices. Other factors contributing to the recent price surge include the strengthening economy, the increased capacity and planned new capacity of gas-burning power plants, and concerns about the decline in gas-directed drilling.

116

Nuclear Energy In the United States Executive Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 10 Status and Outlook for Nuclear Energy In the United States Executive Summary The U.S. nuclear power industry continues to make pro- gress toward the construction of new nuclear power plants in the United States. Currently, 13 license applica- tions are under active review by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for up to 22 new reactors. The De- partment of Energy has awarded conditional commit- ments for loan guarantees to the partners in the Vogtle project and is negotiating terms for loan guarantees with several new nuclear projects. The 104 operating plants continue to perform well, turn- ing in sustained performance for output and capacity factor - an estimated 798.7 billion kilowatt-hours and 90.5 percent respectively in 2009.

117

SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND CHARACTERISTICS AT NUCLEAR FACILITY SITES  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Summary of Revised Tornado, Hurricane and Extreme Straight Wind Characteristics at Nuclear Facility Sites BY: John D. Stevenson Consulting Engineer

118

Summary Short-Term Petroleum and Natural Gas Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Short-Term Petroleum and Natural Gas Outlook Short-Term Petroleum and Natural Gas Outlook 1/12/01 Click here to start Table of Contents Summary Short-Term Petroleum. and Natural Gas Outlook WTI Crude Oil Price: Base Case and 95% Confidence Interval Real and Nominal Crude Oil Prices OPEC Crude Oil Production 1999-2001 Total OECD Oil Stocks* U.S. Crude Oil Inventory Outlook U.S. Distillate Inventory Outlook Distillate Stocks Are Important Part of East Coast Winter Supply Retail Heating Oil and Diesel Fuel Prices Consumer Winter Heating Costs U.S. Total Gasoline Inventory Outlook Retail Motor Gasoline Prices* U.S. Propane Total Stocks Average Weekly Propane Spot Prices Current Natural Gas Spot Prices: Well Above the Recent Price Range Natural Gas Spot Prices: Base Case and 95% Confidence Interval Working Gas in Storage (Percentage Difference fron Previous 5-Year Average)

119

Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Deployment Summary, January 2013 Deployment Summary, January 2013 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2013 January 30, 2013 - 5:59pm Addthis Quarterly Updates On October 22 Dominion Resources Inc. announced that it would close and decommission its Kewaunee Power Station located in Carlton, Wis. after failing to find a buyer for the plant. The company said that the plant closure was a purely economic decision resulting from low projected wholesale electricity prices. Power production will cease in the second quarter of 2013. On November 20, 2012, the Department of Energy announced that it had selected the Generation mPower team as a recipient for Government cost-shared funding as part of its Small Modular Reactor Licensing Technical Support program. The Department also announced plans to issue a

120

Summary of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Non-Proliferation Treaty rests on a basic bargain between the five declared nuclear-weapon states-the United States, Russia, Britain, France and China and 167 states that do not possess nuclear weapons. In addition, to the arms control and disarmaments commitments in Article VI, the parties pledge in the treaty`s pramble their determination to seek a comprehensive test ban (CTB) and express the understanding that in connection with the treaty on general and complete disarmament the parties should seek the cessation of manufacture of nuclear weapons, the liquidation of all their existing stock piles, and the elimination from national arsenals of nuclear weapons and means of their delivery. The author summaries key elements of these agreements.

NONE

1995-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 2012 January 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 January 30, 2012 - 1:10pm Addthis Quarterly News The U.S. NRC voted to approve the amended AP1000 design certification on December 22, 2011. The Commission also announced the rule would be effective immediately after it was published in the Federal Register on December 30, 2011. A final rule for the GE-ABWR design certification amendment was approved and published in the Federal Register on December 16, 2011. The rule will become effective January 17, 2012. The condenser for Vogtle Unit 3 has been completed by Japan's Toshiba and began its journey from Sacheon to Savannah, Georgia on November 21. The condenser marks the first major component Toshiba has shipped for the new generation of U.S nuclear power plants.

122

Natural Resources Defense Council Consent Decree, May 26, 1988 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Decree No. 1:85-2583-6 Decree No. 1:85-2583-6 State South Carolina Agreement Type Consent Decree Legal Driver(s) RCRA Scope Summary Establish guidelines for the closure of certain facilities at the Savannah River Plant. Parties DOE (SRP); State of South Carolina (Department of Health and Environmental Control); US DOJ; Natural Resources Defense Council; Energy Research Foundation; Assistant U.S. Attorney of the District of South Carolina; South Carolina League of Women Voters Date 5/26/1988 SCOPE * Establish guidelines for the closure of certain facilities at the Savannah River Plant: Metallurgical Laboratory Basin, Acid/Caustic Basins, Mixed Waste Management Facility, Seepage Basins, New TXN Basin, Leaking M-Area Storage Tanks. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Applicable schedules and deadlines are established in this Consent Decree.

123

Natural analogues of nuclear waste glass corrosion.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report reviews and summarizes studies performed to characterize the products and processes involved in the corrosion of natural glasses. Studies are also reviewed and evaluated on how well the corrosion of natural glasses in natural environments serves as an analogue for the corrosion of high-level radioactive waste glasses in an engineered geologic disposal system. A wide range of natural and experimental corrosion studies has been performed on three major groups of natural glasses: tektite, obsidian, and basalt. Studies of the corrosion of natural glass attempt to characterize both the nature of alteration products and the reaction kinetics. Information available on natural glass was then compared to corresponding information on the corrosion of nuclear waste glasses, specifically to resolve two key questions: (1) whether one or more natural glasses behave similarly to nuclear waste glasses in laboratory tests, and (2) how these similarities can be used to support projections of the long-term corrosion of nuclear waste glasses. The corrosion behavior of basaltic glasses was most similar to that of nuclear waste glasses, but the corrosion of tektite and obsidian glasses involves certain processes that also occur during the corrosion of nuclear waste glasses. The reactions and processes that control basalt glass dissolution are similar to those that are important in nuclear waste glass dissolution. The key reaction of the overall corrosion mechanism is network hydrolysis, which eventually breaks down the glass network structure that remains after the initial ion-exchange and diffusion processes. This review also highlights some unresolved issues related to the application of an analogue approach to predicting long-term behavior of nuclear waste glass corrosion, such as discrepancies between experimental and field-based estimates of kinetic parameters for basaltic glasses.

Abrajano, T.A. Jr.; Ebert, W.L.; Luo, J.S.

1999-01-06T23:59:59.000Z

124

Summary of Oil and Natural Gas Development Impacts on Prairie Grouse September 2006  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Summary of Oil and Natural Gas Development Impacts on Prairie Grouse September 2006 Jeffrey L. Beck Independent Avenue Grand Junction, CO 81505 Please cite as: Beck, J. L. 2006. Summary of oil and natural gas and Natural Gas Development Impacts on Prairie Grouse 2 disturbances such as oil and gas development

Beck, Jeffrey L.

125

Pena Blanca Natural Analogue Project: Summary of activities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The inactive Nopal I uranium mine in silicic tuff north of Chihuahua City, Chihuahua, Mexico, was studied as a natural analogue for an underground nuclear-waste repository in the unsaturated zone. Site stratigraphy was confirmed from new drill cores. Data from site studies include chemical and isotopic compositions of saturated- and unsaturated-zone waters. A partial geochronology of uranium enrichment and mineralization was established. Evidence pertinent to uranium-series transport in the soil zone and changing redox conditions was collected. The investigations contributed to preliminary, scoping-level performance assessment modeling.

Levy, S.; Goldstein, S.; Dobson, P.F.; Goodell, P.; Ku, T.-L.; Abdel-Fattah, A.; Saulnier, G.; Fayek, M.; de la Garza, R.

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, July 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 2012 July 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, July 2012 July 30, 2012 - 3:27pm Addthis Quarterly News The final ruling on the design certification for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' APWR has been revised until 2015. Structural changes were made to the design by vendor, which requires a new seismic analysis to be performed. Because of this, the review schedule for the COL applications for Comanche Peak and North Anna has been delayed by approximately 18 months. The final ruling on Areva's EPR design certification has been revised from June 2013 until the end of 2014. The change is to allow Areva to respond to outstanding technical issues and provide additional information related to post-Fukushima requirements. DOE released a funding opportunity announcement on March, 22 2012 to

127

Pena Blanca Natural Analogue Project: Summary of activities  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Mountain Performance Assessment based on Natural Analog DataPea Blanca Natural Analogue Performance Assessment Model,

Levy, S.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

128

Volume I, Summary Report: A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants in  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Volume I, Summary Report: A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Volume I, Summary Report: A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants in the United States by 2010: Volume I, Summary Report: A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants in the United States by 2010: Nuclear power plants in the United States currently produce about 20 percent of the nation's electricity. This nuclear-generated electricity is safe, clean and economical, and does not emit greenhouse gases. Continued and expanded reliance on nuclear energy is one key to meeting future demand for electricity in the U.S. and is called for in the National Energy Policy. Nevertheless, no new nuclear plants have been built in the U.S. in many years, and none are currently slated for construction. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has been working with the nuclear

129

Volume I, Summary Report: A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants in  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Volume I, Summary Report: A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Volume I, Summary Report: A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants in the United States by 2010: Volume I, Summary Report: A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants in the United States by 2010: Nuclear power plants in the United States currently produce about 20 percent of the nation's electricity. This nuclear-generated electricity is safe, clean and economical, and does not emit greenhouse gases. Continued and expanded reliance on nuclear energy is one key to meeting future demand for electricity in the U.S. and is called for in the National Energy Policy. Nevertheless, no new nuclear plants have been built in the U.S. in many years, and none are currently slated for construction. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has been working with the nuclear

130

Summary of "Materials Modeling and Simulations for Nuclear Fuels"  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Summary of "Materials Modeling and Simulations for Nuclear Fuels" Summary of "Materials Modeling and Simulations for Nuclear Fuels" (MMSNF 2013) workshop Director's Welcome Organization Achievements Highlights Fact Sheets, Brochures & Other Documents Multimedia Library About Nuclear Energy Nuclear Reactors Designed by Argonne Argonne's Nuclear Science and Technology Legacy Opportunities within NE Division Visit Argonne Work with Argonne Contact us For Employees Site Map Help Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter NE on Flickr Celebrating the 70th Anniversary of Chicago Pile 1 (CP-1) Argonne OutLoud on Nuclear Energy Argonne Energy Showcase 2012 Highlights Bookmark and Share "Materials Modeling and Simulations for Nuclear Fuels" (MMSNF 2013) workshop Workshop Summary Presentation during MMSNF Workshop in Chicago

131

QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY OCTOBER 2013 News Updates  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 News Updates  Dominion has filed an updated integrated resource plan with Virginia and North Carolina State regulators; the plan sets an "earliest possible" in- service date of October 2024 for North Anna 3. Earlier this year, the company announced its intention to return to the General Electric-Hitachi (GEH) ESBWR reactor design with an amended Combined Operating License (COL) to be filed by the end of 2013.  Entergy announced that it will close its single unit Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in late 2014; sustained low natural gas prices, financial impacts of cumulative regulations, and the wholesale market structure all contributed to the company's decision to shutter the plant. This is the fourth plant this year to announce decommissioning plans. Dominion's closure of its single unit Kewaunee plant also followed from low wholesale

132

FY 2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PER Summary | National Nuclear PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, ... FY 2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary

133

,"Iowa Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Summary" Summary" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Prices",5,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1989" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",7,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1990" ,"Data 3","Consumption",6,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1989" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sia_m.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sia_m.htm"

134

,"Illinois Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Summary" Summary" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Prices",5,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1989" ,"Data 2","Production",10,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1991" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",7,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1990" ,"Data 4","Consumption",6,"Monthly","9/2013","1/15/1989" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sil_m.xls"

135

Montana Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

14 993 959 792 616 590 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 817 681 657 522 327 286 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease...

136

Mississippi Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

35 922 858 868 612 600 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 990 884 822 806 550 557 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease...

137

Miscellaneous Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

72 349 363 393 233 188 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 263 271 353 270 219 169 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease...

138

Florida Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 7 56 6 16 15 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 0 0 26 4 16 14 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1 7 30 2 0 1...

139

CA, Coastal Region Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

151 169 180 173 305 284 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1 1 2 1 2 2 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 150 168...

140

CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

81 91 92 102 98 90 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 81 91 92 102...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

2010 Annual Planning Summary for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (NA-20)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

142

2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the National Nuclear Security Administration.

143

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (NA-20)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (NA-20).

144

SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND CHARACTERISTICS AT NUCLEAR FACILITY SITES  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Y Y : J O H N D . S T E V E N S O N C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R 6 6 1 1 R O C K S I D E R D . I N D E P E N D E N C E , O H I O 4 4 1 3 1 T E L . 2 1 6 - 4 4 7 - 9 4 4 0 E M A I L : J S T E V E N S O N 4 @ E A R T H L I N K . N E T SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND CHARACTERISTICS AT NUCLEAR FACILITY SITES Categorization of Natural Hazard Phenomenon and Operational Load Combinations Prior to the 1988 Uniform Building Code, UBC (1) natural hazard phenomenon (earthquake, wind, flooding and precipitation) and operational load combinations were divided into two categories: NORMAL- Loads such as dead, live and design basis pressure. Expected frequency: 1.0 per yr with a limiting acceptance criteria Allowable stress design criteria: equal to one-half to two-thirds of specified minimum yield stress. SEVERE - Natural hazard and operational transient loads.

145

FY 2009 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2009 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, ...

146

FY 2012 B&W Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

2 B&W Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear 2 B&W Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 B&W Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 B&W Technical Services Pantex, LLC, ...

147

FY 2007 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2007 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2007 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, ...

148

FY 2010 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2010 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2010 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, ...

149

Colorado Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4,169 24,081 25,372 26,151 21,674 23,533 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 22,159 22,199 23,001 23,633 18,226 19,253 1979-2013 Natural Gas...

150

California Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,879 2,538 2,926 2,785 3,042 2,119 1979-2012 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 686 621 612 503 510 272 1979-2012 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After...

151

Alaska Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7,766 9,183 8,917 9,511 9,667 7,383 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1,139 1,090 1,021 976 995 955 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet...

152

Arkansas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

5,628 10,872 14,181 16,374 11,039 13,524 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 5,616 10,852 14,152 16,328 10,957 13,389 1979-2013 Natural Gas...

153

Texas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

81,843 85,034 94,287 104,454 93,475 97,921 1981-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 74,284 76,272 84,157 90,947 74,442 75,754 1981-2013 Natural Gas...

154

Utah Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6,714 7,411 7,146 8,108 7,775 7,057 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,393 6,810 6,515 7,199 6,774 6,162 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved,...

155

Louisiana Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

11,816 20,970 29,517 30,545 22,135 20,389 1981-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 10,581 19,898 28,838 29,906 21,362 19,519 1981-2013 Natural Gas...

156

Wyoming Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

32,399 36,748 36,526 36,930 31,636 34,576 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 32,176 36,386 36,192 36,612 30,930 33,774 1979-2013 Natural Gas...

157

California Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,538 2,926 2,785 3,042 2,119 2,023 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 621 612 503 510 272 247 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After...

158

Oklahoma Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

22,113 24,207 28,182 29,937 28,714 28,900 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 21,155 23,115 26,873 27,683 25,018 24,370 1979-2013 Natural Gas...

159

Ohio Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

985 896 832 758 1,235 3,201 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 886 799 742 684 1,012 2,887 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease...

160

Michigan Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

3,253 2,805 2,975 2,549 1,781 1,839 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,105 2,728 2,903 2,472 1,687 1,714 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Alabama Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

3,379 2,948 2,724 2,570 2,304 1,670 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,360 2,919 2,686 2,522 2,204 1,624 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved,...

162

Pennsylvania Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,594 7,018 14,068 26,719 36,543 50,078 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,467 6,885 13,924 26,585 36,418 49,809 1979-2013 Natural Gas...

163

Kansas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,795 3,500 3,937 3,747 3,557 3,772 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,710 3,417 3,858 3,620 3,231 3,339 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved,...

164

CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2,249 2,609 2,447 2,685 1,650 1,574 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 617 607 498 506 269 245 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After...

165

Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Project Summary Project Summary HELP Index Summary Scenario References Student Pages Subject/Content Area: Ecology and Data Collection Target Audience: This project is designed for upper intermediate grade students. Access to a river or stream is critical to the success of this project. Students need access to the Internet and data collection software. Project Goals: When presented with an environmental problem on a local river, students will use their knowledge of river ecology to develop an action plan. Learner Outcomes: The students will be able to Use river monitoring equipment to collect river monitoring data, including biological, physical,and chemical data. Design a project that aids the class in accompolishing one of four goals: Raising smallmouth bass Creating a stream habitat in an aquarium

166

Brief 70 Nuclear Engineering Enrollments and Degrees, 2011 Summary Information  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The survey includes degrees granted between September 1, 2010 and August 31, 2011. Enrollment information refers to the fall term 2011. The enrollment and degree data include students majoring in nuclear engineering or in an option program equivalent to a major. Thirty-two academic programs reported having nuclear engineering programs during 2011, and data was received from all thirty-two programs. The data for two nuclear engineering programs include enrollments and degrees in health physics options that are also reported in the health physics enrollments and degrees data.

Dr. Don Johnson

2012-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

167

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Now that the heating season has ended, natural gas wellhead prices have fallen from the exceptionally high levels seen in February and early March. Nevertheless, they still remain historically and unseasonably high, hovering around $5.00 per MMBtu. EIA projects that natural gas wellhead prices will remain above $5.00 per MMBtu in April and then decrease to $4.36 in May and $4.26 in June (Short-Term Energy Outlook, April 2003). Wellhead prices for the 2002-2003 heating season (November through March) averaged $4.44 per MMBtu, or $2.08 more than last winter's price. Overall in 2003, wellhead prices are projected to increase about $1.53 per MMBtu over the 2002 level to $4.40 per MMBtu. This projection is based on the expectation of lower volumes of natural gas in underground storage compared with last year and continued increases in demand over 2002 levels. Cold temperatures this past winter led to a record drawdown of storage stocks. By the end of March, estimated working gas stocks were 676 Bcf (prior estimates were 696 Bcf), which is the lowest end-of-March level in EIA records and 44 percent below the previous 5-year average. In 2004, continued tightness of domestic natural gas supply and high demand levels are expected to keep the average wellhead price near the 2003 level.

168

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5.57 per MMBtu in January 2004 and $5.40 in February, and then decrease to $4.77 in March as the heating season winds down (Short-Term Energy Outlook, January 2004). Spot prices were quite variable in December, with prices at the Henry Hub starting the month at around $5.00 per MMBtu, spiking to roughly $7.00 in the middle of the month, then falling to $5.50 toward the end of the month as warmer-than-normal weather eased demand. Spot prices will likely remain well above $5.00 over the next few months if normal or colder weather prevails, especially with oil prices remaining at relatively high levels. (Oil prices this winter are expected to average $31.35 per barrel (19 cents higher than last winter's average), or 5.41 per MMBtu.) Natural gas storage levels were 8 percent above average as of January 2, which could place downward pressure on prices if warm temperatures and weak heating demand occur later this winter, just as rising prices are possible if the weather becomes colder. Overall in 2004, natural gas wellhead prices are expected to average $4.73 per MMBtu, while spot prices will average nearly $5.00. In 2005, natural gas spot prices are projected to fall to an average of $4.83 per MMBtu under the assumption that domestic and imported supply can continue to grow by about 1-1.5 percent per year.

169

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

the rest of the winter and the first part of spring, with prices averaging $5.19 per MMBtu through March and $4.58 in April (Short-Term Energy Outlook, February 2004). Wellhead prices for the current heating season (November 2003 through March 2004) are expected to average $4.99 per MMBtu, or about 7 percent higher than last winter's level. Spot prices at the Henry Hub averaged $5.90 per MMBtu in January as cold temperatures (6 percent colder than normal nationally and 19 percent colder than normal in the Northeast) kept natural gas prices and heating demand high. Despite the severe weather, natural gas storage stocks were 3 percent above average as of January 30 and spot prices in early February have moved down somewhat. Overall in 2004, spot prices are expected to average about $4.90 per MMBtu and wellhead prices are expected to average $4.63 per MMBtu, declining moderately from the 2003 levels. In 2005, natural gas spot prices are projected to average about $5.00 per MMBtu, under the assumption that domestic and imported supply can continue to grow by about 1 percent per year.

170

Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Golden Field Office Golden Field Office Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DOE/EIS-0407D September 2009 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Abengoa Biorefinery Project near Hugoton, Stevens County, Kansas Summary Cover photos courtesy of (left to right): Southeast Renewable Fuels, LLC DOE National Renewable Energy Laboratory Public domain U.S. Department of Energy Golden Field Office Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy DOE/EIS-0407D September 2009 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Abengoa Biorefinery Project near Hugoton, Stevens County, Kansas Summary COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) COOPERATING AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture-Rural Development is a cooperating agency in the preparation of the Abengoa Biorefinery Project EIS.

171

Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SPACE SPACE Project Summary HELP Index Summary Scenario Internet Links Student Pages Subject/Content Area: Interdisciplinary: Science - astronomy; Math - problem-solving and measurement; Art; Social Studies - current events; and Language Arts - reference. skills Target Audience: Middle school students, 7th grade, all levels Project Goals: A collaborative, seven-to-ten weeks investigation of the space program, specifically space stations, its impact on our lives and the world Learner Outcomes: Students will be able to: Gather information and use decision-making skills to evaluate this information. Establish connections and to develop decision-making skills about science and technology. Identify and state a problem; design, implement, and evaluate the solution. Gather and use information for research purposes.

172

,"Missouri Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_smo_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_smo_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

173

,"Alaska Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2011,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",12,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",2,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1969" ,"Data 7","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sak_a.xls"

174

,"Louisiana Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2011,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 7","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sla_a.xls"

175

,"Nebraska Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sne_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sne_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

176

,"Indiana Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sin_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sin_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

177

,"Georgia Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1999" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1974" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sga_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sga_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

178

,"Oregon Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1979" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sor_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sor_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

179

,"California Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2011,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 7","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sca_a.xls"

180

,"Idaho Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",2,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1974" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 5","Consumption",9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sid_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sid_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

,"U.S. Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1922" 4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1922" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2011,"6/30/1925" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1900" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",6,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1935" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1969" ,"Data 7","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1930" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_nus_a.xls"

182

,"Massachusetts Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sma_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sma_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

183

,"Minnesota Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_smn_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_smn_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

184

,"Washington Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_swa_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_swa_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

185

,"Tennessee Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1968" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_stn_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_stn_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration"

186

QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2013 News Updates  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 News Updates  Dominion Resources, Inc. has informed the NRC that Dominion Virginia Power will amend its COL application to reflect the ESBWR technology by the end of 2013. In 2009 Dominion dropped the ESBWR from its COLA after failing to reach a commercial agreement with General Electric-Hitachi (GEH). A COL is expected no earlier than late 2015. Dominion Virginia Power has not yet committed to building a new nuclear unit at North Anna.  NRC has determined that the latest revision to the South Texas Project COLA does not alleviate foreign interest concerns; the staff found that despite having only a 10% ownership stake in Nuclear Innovation North America LLC (NINA), Toshiba American Nuclear Energy Corporation's financing of all project costs effectively resulted in control and domination of NINA. The COL review remains active while NINA considers its options

187

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

this summer and continue at elevated levels through the rest of 2003 (Short-Term Energy Outlook, June 2003). Natural gas wellhead prices are expected to average $5.40 per MMBtu in June and remain above $5.13 through December 2003. Spot prices at the Henry Hub have stayed well above $5.00 per MMBtu on a monthly basis since the beginning of the year and have been above $6.00 for the first 10 days of June. The low level of underground storage is the principal reason for these unusually high prices. As of June 6, 2003, working gas stocks were 1,324 Bcf, which is about 35 percent below year-earlier levels and 25 percent below the 5-year average. Natural gas prices are likely to stay high as long as above-normal storage injection demand competes with industrial and power sector demand for gas. Overall in 2003, wellhead prices are projected to increase about $2.33 per MMBtu (the largest U.S. annual wellhead price increase on record) over the 2002 level to a record annual high of about $5.20 per MMBtu. For 2004, prices are projected to ease only moderately, as supplies are expected to remain tight.

188

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4.41 per MMBtu in December 2003, although spot prices are expected to average $5.38 (Short-Term Energy Outlook, December 2003). The average wellhead price is expected to increase moderately to $4.56 during the first three months of 2004. Natural gas prices were lower in November than previously expected but forward price expectations remain sensitive to weather conditions. Prices increased rapidly in futures trading in early December as some cold weather moved into the Eastern United States and reported withdrawals from gas storage were slightly larger than expected. Spot prices above $5 per MMBtu remain likely over the next few months if normal (or colder) weather prevails, especially with oil prices remaining at relatively high levels. Natural gas storage levels are still above average and hold the potential to push prices back down if warm temperatures and weak heating demand materialize later in the winter, just as upward spikes remain a strong possibility if the weather turns cold.

189

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

about $3.49 per MMBtu through December 2002 and then increase to $3.76 in January 2003, the peak demand month of the heating season (Short-Term Energy Outlook, released November 7, 2002). Natural gas prices were higher than expected in October as storms in the Gulf of Mexico in late September temporarily shut in some gas production, causing spot prices at the Henry Hub and elsewhere to rise above $4.00 per million Btu for most of October. In addition, early winter-like temperatures, particularly in the Midwest and Northeast, increased demand for natural gas, placing upward pressure on gas prices. Overall in 2002, wellhead prices are expected to average about $2.84 per MMBtu compared with $4.00 in 2001. Prices during the heating season (November through March), assuming normal weather, are expected to average $3.56 per MMBtu, which is about $1.20 higher than last winter's price. Prices to residential customers during the heating season are expected to average $7.81 per MMBtu compared with $7.14 last winter. In 2003, wellhead prices are projected to average $3.28 per MMBtu, or about $0.44 per MMBtu more than in 2002, owing to expectations of increasing economic growth, little or no change in the annual average crude oil price for 2003, and lower storage levels for most of 2003 compared with 2002 levels.

190

Nuclear rapprochement in Argentina and Brazil: Workshop summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On October 21 and 22, 1998, the Center for International Security Affairs at Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Center for Global Security and Cooperation at Science Applications International Corporation hosted the first of a series of work-shops on states that have chosen to roll back their pursuit of nuclear arms. The objective of the workshop series is to conduct a systematic evaluation of the roles played by U.S. nonproliferation policy in cases of nuclear rollback or restraint and to provide recommendations for future nonproliferation efforts based on lessons learned. Key attendees at the workshop included officials and former officials from the foreign ministries of Argentina and Brazil, and current and former officials from the U.S. Department of State, the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), and the Department of Energy (DOE). Scholars and independent researchers who have examined nuclear policy in Argentina and Brazil also participated. This workshop report includes important background information that helps set the stage for assessing nuclear policies in Argentina and Brazil. It describes national perspectives and areas of consensus and debate among the participants, particularly on the questions of lessons learned and their salience to proliferation challenges in other states. It also summarizes key questions and propositions regarding the roles played in these cases by U.S. nonproliferation policy.

James E. Doyle

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

191

Net Withdrawals of Natural Gas from Underground Storage (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Pipeline and Distribution Use Price Citygate Price Residential Price Commercial Price Industrial Price Vehicle Fuel Price Electric Power Price Proved Reserves as of 12/31 Reserves Adjustments Reserves Revision Increases Reserves Revision Decreases Reserves Sales Reserves Acquisitions Reserves Extensions Reserves New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Number of Producing Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals From Oil Wells Gross Withdrawals From Shale Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals From Coalbed Wells Repressuring Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed Vented and Flared Marketed Production Natural Gas Processed NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Dry Production Imports By Pipeline LNG Imports Exports Exports By Pipeline LNG Exports Underground Storage Capacity Underground Storage Injections Underground Storage Withdrawals Underground Storage Net Withdrawals LNG Storage Additions LNG Storage Withdrawals LNG Storage Net Withdrawals Total Consumption Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption Lease Fuel Plant Fuel Pipeline & Distribution Use Delivered to Consumers Residential Commercial Industrial Vehicle Fuel Electric Power Period: Monthly Annual

192

,"New Mexico Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2011,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",2,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snm_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snm_a.htm"

193

,"Connecticut Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sct_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sct_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:43:03 AM"

194

,"Wisconsin Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_swi_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_swi_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:44:50 AM"

195

,"South Dakota Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1984" ,"Data 4","Consumption",10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_ssd_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_ssd_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:44:30 AM"

196

,"Pennsylvania Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2011,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_spa_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_spa_a.htm"

197

,"Nevada Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1991" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 4","Consumption",10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snv_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snv_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:44:08 AM"

198

,"Delaware Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sde_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sde_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:43:06 AM"

199

,"Colorado Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2011,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",2,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sco_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sco_a.htm"

200

,"Arkansas Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2011,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sar_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sar_a.htm"

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

,"Maine Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sme_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sme_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:43:37 AM"

202

,"South Carolina Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_ssc_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_ssc_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:44:28 AM"

203

,"Rhode Island Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sri_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sri_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:44:27 AM"

204

,"North Carolina Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snc_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snc_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:43:55 AM"

205

,"New Hampshire Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1977" 9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snh_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snh_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:44:02 AM"

206

,"Maryland Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 9,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1999" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_smd_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_smd_a.htm"

207

,"New Jersey Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 7,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snj_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_snj_a.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information Administration" ,"For Help, Contact:","infoctr@eia.gov" ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"12/19/2013 6:44:04 AM"

208

,"Virginia Natural Gas Summary"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" 8,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2011,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Production",11,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 6","Consumption",10,"Annual",2012,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","12/12/2013" ,"Next Release Date:","1/7/2014" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sva_a.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_sum_lsum_dcu_sva_a.htm"

209

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4.20 per MMBtu through January 2003 and then increase to $4.61 in February and $4.23 in March (Short-Term Energy Outlook, released January 8, 2003). Wellhead prices for the overall heating season (November through March), assuming normal weather, are expected to average about $4.10 per MMBtu, or $1.74 more than last winter's levels, while prices to residential customers are expected to average $8.51 per MMBtu compared with $7.14 last winter. Natural gas prices were higher than expected in November and December as below-normal temperatures throughout much of the nation increased heating demand, placing upward pressure on gas prices. Spot prices at the Henry Hub climbed above $5.00 per MMBtu in the second week of December and stayed near or above this threshold through the end of the month. Overall in 2002, wellhead prices are expected to average $2.90 per MMBtu compared with $4.00 in 2001. In 2003, average wellhead prices are projected to increase about $1.00 per MMBtu over the 2002 level to $3.90 per MMBtu, owing to expectations of higher demand levels than in 2002 and lower storage levels for most of the year compared with 2002 levels.

210

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8 per MMBtu during the last 2 months of 2003 and increase to $4.36 in January 2004 (Short-Term Energy Outlook, November 2003). Prices have fallen in the past few months as mild weather and reduced industrial demand have allowed record storage refill rates. As of October 31, 2003, working gas levels had reached 3,155 Bcf, which is about 3 percent higher than the 5-year average and the first time since October 2002 that stocks exceeded the year-earlier levels. With the improved storage situation, wellhead prices during the current heating season (November through March) are expected to be about 12 percent less than last winter ($4.12 vs. $4.68 per MMBtu). However, prices in the residential sector will likely be about 8 percent higher than last winter, as accumulated natural gas utility costs through 2003 are recovered in higher household delivery charges. Overall in 2003, wellhead prices are expected to average $4.76 per MMBtu, which is nearly $2 more than the 2002 annual average and the largest year-to-year increase on record. For 2004, wellhead prices are projected to drop by nearly $0.90 per MMBtu, or about 18 percent, to $3.88 per MMBtu as the overall supply situation improves.

211

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

range from $2.91 to $3.19 per MMBtu through December 2002 and then increase to $3.53 in January 2003, the peak demand month of the heating season (Short-Term Energy Outlook, October 2002). Natural gas prices climbed sharply in late September as hurricanes Isidore and Lili caused production shut downs in the Gulf of Mexico. However, this price surge is expected to be short-lived, unless the weather in October is unusually cold or if additional storm activity in the Gulf curbs production further. Overall in 2002, wellhead prices are expected to average about $2.76 per MMBtu compared with $4.00 in 2001. Prices during the upcoming heating season (November through March), assuming normal weather, are expected to average $3.32 per MMBtu, which is about $0.96 higher than last winter's price. Prices to residential customers during the heating season are expected to average $7.55 per MMBtu compared with $7.14 last winter.

212

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

prices will remain relatively high during the storage refill season (April through October) and the rest of 2004. Wellhead prices are expected to average $4.87 per MMBtu in April and May, $4.71 from June through October, and $5.12 for November and December (Short-Term Energy Outlook, April 2004). Spot prices during the storage refill months will likely average $5.23 per MMBtu, virtually the same as the average price ($5.22) this past heating season. Overall in 2004, spot prices are expected to average $5.31 per MMBtu, slightly less than the 2003 price ($5.35), while wellhead prices will average about $4.90. In 2005, natural gas spot prices will likely average about $5.25 per MMBtu, under the assumption that domestic supply can continue to grow by about 1 percent per year. Total available supply (including imports and storage inventories) is expected to increase to 22.31 Tcf in 2004 compared with 21.78 Tcf in 2003. Storage stocks at the end of the traditional heating season (March 31) were about 6 percent less than the 5-year average but nearly 50 percent more than year-earlier levels.

213

Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that natural gas prices will remain relatively high for the rest of 2004. Wellhead prices are expected to average $5.41 per MMBtu through the end of the storage refill season (October 31) and $5.59 in November and December. Spot prices (composites for producing-area hubs) averaged about $5.30 per MMBtu in the first quarter of this year but are currently near $6.00. Barring cooler-than-normal weather this summer, the likelihood appears small that spot prices will fall significantly below $5.65 per MMBtu for the rest of 2004. Overall in 2004, spot prices will likely average $5.62 per MMBtu and wellhead prices will average $5.33. In 2005, spot prices are expected to increase to $5.90 per MMBtu. As in other recent projections, this outcome depends on modest growth in domestic production and total available supply (including imports and storage inventories) in both 2004 and 2005. Underground storage facilities reported net injections of 199 Bcf for April, well above the previous 5-year average of 139 Bcf. At the end of April, storage stocks were only about 2 percent below the 5-year average level and 37 percent higher than last year at this time based on monthly survey data.

214

Government research and development summaries: Nuclear project briefs. Irregular  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Nuclear, Te, Ti Project Briefs describe the status of all R D program submitted to the Power Information Center by the government sponsors in energy conversion from fission, fusion, and radioisotope power sources and other thermal systems that use thermionic systems. These briefs also follow related investigations of plasma dynamics. The document is not to be reproduced, in whole or in part, for dissemination outside your own organization nor may it be reproduced for advertising or sales promotion purposes.

Not Available

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

Government research and development summaries: Nuclear project briefs. Irregular  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Nuclear, Te, Ti Project Briefs describe the status of all R D program submitted to the Power Information Center by the government sponsors in energy conversion from fission, fusion, and radioisotope power sources and other thermal systems that use thermionic systems. These briefs also follow related investigations of plasma dynamics. The document is not to be reproduced, in whole or in part, for dissemination outside your own organization nor may it be reproduced for advertising or sales promotion purposes.

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

Executive Summary - Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In November 2012, the Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) released a new report, 'Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity.' The study provides a new methodological approach to estimate natural gas related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, tracks trends in regulatory and voluntary industry practices, and explores various electricity futures. The Executive Summary provides key findings, insights, data, and figures from this major study.

Logan, J.; Heath, G.; Macknick, J.; Paranhos, E.; Boyd, W.; Carlson, K.

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Imperial-Mexicali DEIS Imperial-Mexicali DEIS S-1 May 2004 SUMMARY S.1 BACKGROUND S.1.1 Previous NEPA Review and Litigation Baja California Power, Inc. (hereafter referred to as Intergen), applied to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on February 27, 2001, to construct a double-circuit, 230,000-volt (230-kV) transmission line across the U.S.-Mexico border. In a separate but similar proceeding, Sempra Energy Resources (hereafter referred to as Sempra) applied to DOE for a Presidential permit on March 7, 2001, also proposing to construct a double-circuit, 230-kV transmission line across the U.S.-Mexico border. Executive Order (E.O.) 10485 (September 9, 1953), as amended by E.O. 12038 (February 7, 1978), requires that a Presidential permit be issued by DOE before electric transmission facilities may be constructed, operated, maintained,

218

Nature of Transactions (TI) Code | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nature of Transactions (TI) Code | National Nuclear Security Administration Nature of Transactions (TI) Code | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Nature of Transactions (TI) Code Home > About Us > Our Programs > Nuclear Security > Nuclear Materials Management & Safeguards System > NMMSS Information, Reports & Forms > Code Tables > Nature of Transactions (TI) Code

219

Summary of space nuclear reactor power systems, 1983--1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes major developments in the last ten years which have greatly expanded the space nuclear reactor power systems technology base. In the SP-100 program, after a competition between liquid-metal, gas-cooled, thermionic, and heat pipe reactors integrated with various combinations of thermoelectric thermionic, Brayton, Rankine, and Stirling energy conversion systems, three concepts:were selected for further evaluation. In 1985, the high-temperature (1,350 K), lithium-cooled reactor with thermoelectric conversion was selected for full scale development. Since then, significant progress has been achieved including the demonstration of a 7-y-life uranium nitride fuel pin. Progress on the lithium-cooled reactor with thermoelectrics has progressed from a concept, through a generic flight system design, to the design, development, and testing of specific components. Meanwhile, the USSR in 1987--88 orbited a new generation of nuclear power systems beyond the, thermoelectric plants on the RORSAT satellites. The US has continued to advance its own thermionic fuel element development, concentrating on a multicell fuel element configuration. Experimental work has demonstrated a single cell operating time of about 1 1/2-y. Technology advances have also been made in the Stirling engine; an advanced engine that operates at 1,050 K is ready for testing. Additional concepts have been studied and experiments have been performed on a variety of systems to meet changing needs; such as powers of tens-to-hundreds of megawatts and highly survivable systems of tens-of-kilowatts power.

Buden, D.

1993-08-11T23:59:59.000Z

220

Evaluating summary statistics used to test for incomplete lineage sorting: mito-nuclear discordance in the reef  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Evaluating summary statistics used to test for incomplete lineage sorting: mito-nuclear discordance and simulated data when testing drivers of mito-nuclear discordance in a statistical frame- work. While earlier for mitochon- drial COI. Coalescent simulations and neutrality tests suggested that mito-nuclear dis- cordance

Hellberg, Michael E.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Executive Summary - Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Executive Summary - Natural Gas Executive Summary - Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity Jeffrey Logan, Garvin Heath, and Jordan Macknick National Renewable Energy Laboratory Elizabeth Paranhos and William Boyd University of Colorado Law School Ken Carlson Colorado State University Technical Report NREL/TP-6A50-57702 January 2013 The Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the University of Colorado-Boulder, the Colorado School of Mines, the Colorado State University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Stanford University. JISEA ® and all JISEA-based marks are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Alliance for

222

Nuclear Energy  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Nuclear Energy ... A brief summary of the history and key concepts of nuclear energy. ... Nuclear / Radiochemistry ...

Charles D. Mickey

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

223

Scalar Nature of the Nuclear Density Functional  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Because of the rotational invariance of the nuclear Hamiltonian, there exists a density functional for nuclei that depends only on two scalar densities. Practical calculations boil down to radial, one-dimensional ones.

B. G. Giraud

2008-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

224

Summary Report for the Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School 2014  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Executive Summary The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) hosted students from across the United States at the 3rd Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School from 16 27 June 2014. The summer school provided students with a unique understanding of nuclear security challenges faced in the field and exposed them to the technical foundations, analyses, and insight that will be required by future leaders in technology development and implementation. The course heavily emphasized laboratory and field demonstrations including direct measurements of special nuclear material. Student evaluations and feedback from student advisors indicates that the summer school achieved its objectives of 1) exposing students to the range of nuclear security applications for which radiation detection is necessary, 2) articulating the relevance of student research into the broader context, and 3) exciting students about the possibility of future careers in nuclear security. In fact, we are beginning to see previous students both enroll in graduate programs (former undergraduates) and complete internships at agencies like the National Nuclear Security Administration.

Runkle, Robert C.; Baciak, James E.; Woodring, Mitchell L.; Jenno, Diana M.

2014-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

225

Nuclear criticality safety experiments, calculations, and analyses - 1958 to 1982. Volume 2. Summaries. Complilation of papers from the Transactions of the American Nuclear Society  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This compilation contains 688 complete summaries of papers on nuclear criticality safety as presented at meetings of the American Nuclear Society (ANS). The selected papers contain criticality parameters for fissile materials derived from experiments and calculations, as well as criticality safety analyses for fissile material processing, transport, and storage. The compilation was developed as a component of the Nuclear Criticality Information System (NCIS) now under development at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The compilation is presented in two volumes: Volume 1 contains a directory to the ANS Transaction volume and page number where each summary was originally published, the author concordance, and the subject concordance derived from the keyphrases in titles. Volume 2 contains-in chronological order-the full-text summaries, reproduced here by permission of the American Nuclear Society from their Transactions, volumes 1-41.

Koponen, B.L.; Hampel, V.E.

1982-10-21T23:59:59.000Z

226

Natural circulating passive cooling system for nuclear reactor containment structure  

DOE Patents [OSTI]

A passive cooling system for the contaminant structure of a nuclear reactor plant providing protection against overpressure within the containment attributable to inadvertent leakage or rupture of the system components. The cooling system utilizes natural convection for transferring heat imbalances and enables the discharge of irradiation free thermal energy to the atmosphere for heat disposal from the system.

Gou, Perng-Fei (Saratoga, CA); Wade, Gentry E. (Saratoga, CA)

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Hydrogen and Hydrogen/Natural Gas Station and Vehicle Operations - 2006 Summary Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is a summary of the operations and testing of internal combustion engine vehicles that were fueled with 100% hydrogen and various blends of hydrogen and compressed natural gas (HCNG). It summarizes the operations of the Arizona Public Service Alternative Fuel Pilot Plant, which produces, compresses, and dispenses hydrogen fuel. Other testing activities, such as the destructive testing of a CNG storage cylinder that was used for HCNG storage, are also discussed. This report highlights some of the latest technology developments in the use of 100% hydrogen fuels in internal combustion engine vehicles. Reports are referenced and WWW locations noted as a guide for the reader that desires more detailed information. These activities are conducted by Arizona Public Service, Electric Transportation Applications, the Idaho National Laboratory, and the U.S. Department of Energys Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity.

Francfort; Donald Karner; Roberta Brayer

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

Sizing particles of natural uranium and nuclear fuels using poly-allyl-diglycol carbonate autoradiography  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......particles of natural uranium and nuclear fuels...low enriched, depleted and natural uranium and also aged...committed doses and cancer risks(4...Bristol, UK, sized uranium fragments found...nuclear fuels of depleted uranium (depUO2......

G. Hegyi; R. B. Richardson

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

229

Performance of Liquid Metals in Natural Circulation Cooled Nuclear Reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The inherent safety capability of natural circulation makes reactor design more reliable. Additionally, the construction and operation of a nuclear power plant with natural circulation in the primary cooling circuit is an interesting alternative for nuclear plant designers, due to their lower operational and investment costs obtained by simplifying systems and controls. This paper deals with the feasibility of application of natural circulation in the primary cooling circuit of a liquid metal fast reactor. The methodology employed is a non-dimensional analysis, which describes the relationship between the physical properties and system variables. The performance criterion is bounded by a safety argument, referring to the maximum cladding temperature allowed during operation. The study considers several coolants, which can play a part in reactor cooling systems, such as lead, lead-bismuth and sodium. Bismuth and gallium are included in this analysis, in order to extend the range of properties for reference purposes. The results present a characterization of natural circulation flow in a reactor and compare the cooling capabilities from different liquid metals coolants. (authors)

Ceballos, Carlos; Lathouwers, Danny; Verkooijen, Adrian [Interfacultair Reactor Instituut, Technische Universiteit Delft, Mekelweg 15, Delft (Netherlands)

2004-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

Table 1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, 2007-2011  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, 2007-2011 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Wells Producing at End of Year 452,945 476,652 493,100 487,627 514,637 Production (million cubic feet) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells R 14,991,891 R 15,134,644 R 14,414,287 R 13,247,498 12,291,070 From Oil Wells R 5,681,871 R 5,609,425 R 5,674,120 R 5,834,703 5,907,919 From Coalbed Wells R 1,999,748 R 2,022,228 R 2,010,171 1,916,762 1,779,055 From Shale Gas Wells 1,990,145 R 2,869,960 R 3,958,315 5,817,122 8,500,983 Total 24,663,656 25,636,257 26,056,893 R 26,816,085 28,479,026 Repressuring 3,662,685 3,638,622 3,522,090 3,431,587 3,365,313 Vented and Flared 143,457 166,909 165,360

231

Two-billion-year-old nuclear reactors: Nature goes fission  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Once it was thought that the isotopic composition of natural uranium was invariant. It was thus surprising in 1972 when French scientists observed small but significant deficiencies of the minor isotope {sup 235}U in uranium ore. Subsequent investigations traced the isotopically anomalous material to the Oklo mine in the African Republic of Gabon. In the mine, cubic-dekametre-sized pods of rock were found to contain extraordinary concentrations of uranium, as much as 65%, with as little as half the normal isotopic abundance of {sup 235}U. In these rocks, neodymium was found to be deficient in the premordial isotope {sup 142}Nd and enriched in the fission-produced isotopes {sup 143-150}Nd. The presence of fission products was unambiguous evidence that the {sup 235}U deficiencies were the result of sustained nuclear fission. Within the heart of the natural reactors, the fission densities were on the order of 10{sup 20} fissions/cm{sup 3}, producing hundreds of megajoules of energy and tens of microwatts of power per gram of rock. Nature had forestalled man`s great discovery of energy production by nuclear fission.

Curtis, D.B. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (US)

1992-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

232

The Geochemistry of Technetium: A Summary of the Behavior of an Artificial Element in the Natural Environment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Interest in the chemistry of technetium has only increased since its discovery in 1937, mainly because of the large and growing inventory of 99Tc generated during fission of 235U, its environmental mobility in oxidizing conditions, and its potential radiotoxicity. For every ton of enriched uranium fuel (3% 235U) that is consumed at a typical burn-up rate, nearly 1 kg of 99Tc is generated. Thus, the mass of 99Tc produced since 1993 has nearly quadrupled, and will likely to continue to increase if more emphasis is placed on nuclear power to slow the accumulation of atmospheric greenhouse gases. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the interaction of 99Tc and the natural environment, we review the sources of 99Tc in the nuclear fuel cycle, its chemical properties, radiochemistry, and biogeochemical behavior. We include an evaluation of the use of Re as a chemical analog of Tc, as well as a summary of the redox potential, thermodynamics, sorption, colloidal behavior, and interaction of humic substances with Tc, and the potential for re-oxidation and remobilization of Tc(IV). What emerges is a more complicated picture of Tc behavior than that of an easily tractable transition of Tc(VII) to Tc(IV) with consequent immobilization. Reducing conditions (+200 to +100 mV Eh) are generally thought necessary to cause reduction of Tc(VII) to Tc(IV), but far more important are the presence of reducing agents, such as Fe(II) sorbed onto mineral grains. Catalysis of Tc(VII) by surface-mediated Fe(II) will bring the mobile Tc(VII) species to a lower oxidation state and will form the relatively insoluble Tc(IV)O2?nH2O, but even as a solid, equilibrium concentrations of aqueous Tc are nearly a factor of 20 above the EPA set drinking water standards. However, sequestration of Tc(IV) into Fe(III)-bearing phases, such as goethite or other hydrous oxyhydroxides of iron, may ameliorate concerns over the mobility of Tc. Further, the outcome of many studies on terrestrial and marine sediments that are oxidizing overall indicate that Tc is relatively immobile, due to formation of oxygen-depleted microenvironments that develop in response to bacteriological activities. The rate of re-mobilization of Tc from these microenvironments is just beginning to be assessed, but with no firm consensus. Reassessment of the simple models in which Tc is mobilized and immobilized is therefore urged.

Icenhower, Jonathan P.; Qafoku, Nikolla; Martin, Wayne J.; Zachara, John M.

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

Sizing particles of natural uranium and nuclear fuels using poly-allyl-diglycol carbonate autoradiography  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......University Health Center, Montreal...Biology and Health Physics Branch...enriched, depleted and natural uranium and also aged...fiberglass filter. Health Phys (2000...of natural uranium and nuclear...enriched, depleted and natural......

G. Hegyi; R. B. Richardson

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

Summary of four release consequence analyses for hypothetical nuclear waste repositories in salt and granite  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Release consequence methology developed under the Assessment of Effectiveness of Geologic Isolation Systems (AEGIS) program has now been applied to four hypothetical repository sites. This paper summarizes the results of these four studies in order to demonstrate that the far-field methodology developed under the AEGIS program offers a practical approach to the post-closure safety assessment of nuclear waste repositories sited in deep continental geologic formations. The four studies are briefly described and compared according to the following general categories: physical description of the repository (size, inventory, emplacement depth); geologic and hydrologic description of the site and the conceptual hydrologic model for the site; description of release scenario; hydrologic model implementation and results; engineered barriers and leach rate modeling; transport model implementation and results; and dose model implementation and results. These studies indicate the following: numerical modeling is a practical approach to post-closure safety assessment analysis for nuclear waste repositories; near-field modeling capability needs improvement to permit assessment of the consequences of human intrusion and pumping well scenarios; engineered barrier systems can be useful in mitigating consequences for postulated release scenarios that short-circuit the geohydrologic system; geohydrologic systems separating a repository from the natural biosphere discharge sites act to mitigate the consequences of postulated breaches in containment; and engineered barriers of types other than the containment or absorptive type may be useful.

Cole, C.R.; Bond, F.W.

1980-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

235

Summary engineering description of underwater fuel storage facility for foreign research reactor spent nuclear fuel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a summary description for an Underwater Fuel Storage Facility (UFSF) for foreign research reactor (FRR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF). A FRR SNF environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is being prepared and will include both wet and dry storage facilities as storage alternatives. For the UFSF presented in this document, a specific site is not chosen. This facility can be sited at any one of the five locations under consideration in the EIS. These locations are the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Savannah River Site, Hanford, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Nevada Test Site. Generic facility environmental impacts and emissions are provided in this report. A baseline fuel element is defined in Section 2.2, and the results of a fission product analysis are presented. Requirements for a storage facility have been researched and are summarized in Section 3. Section 4 describes three facility options: (1) the Centralized-UFSF, which would store the entire fuel element quantity in a single facility at a single location, (2) the Regionalized Large-UFSF, which would store 75% of the fuel element quantity in some region of the country, and (3) the Regionalized Small-UFSF, which would store 25% of the fuel element quantity, with the possibility of a number of these facilities in various regions throughout the country. The operational philosophy is presented in Section 5, and Section 6 contains a description of the equipment. Section 7 defines the utilities required for the facility. Cost estimates are discussed in Section 8, and detailed cost estimates are included. Impacts to worker safety, public safety, and the environment are discussed in Section 9. Accidental releases are presented in Section 10. Standard Environmental Impact Forms are included in Section 11.

Dahlke, H.J.; Johnson, D.A.; Rawlins, J.K.; Searle, D.K.; Wachs, G.W.

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

236

Recoverable Natural Gas Resource of the United States: Summary of Recent Estimates  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Summary of Recent Estimates John B. Curtis 1 Scott L. Montgomery...montgomery@prodigy.net John B. Curtis is associate professor...Technology Institute (Holtberg and Cochener, 2001), the National Petroleum...the Potential Gas Committee: John D. Haun, David F. Morehouse...

John B. Curtis; Scott L. Montgomery

237

2010 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA-SC)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

238

CA, State Offshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

57 57 66 82 66 75 1979-2013 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3 4 3 3 1 0 1979-2013 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 54 53 63 79 65...

239

The US nuclear reaction data network. Summary of the first meeting, March 13 & 14 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The first meeting of the US Nuclear Reaction Data Network (USNRDN) was held at the Colorado School of Mines, March 13-14, 1996 chaired by F. Edward Cecil. The Agenda of the meeting is attached. The Network, its mission, products and services; related nuclear data and data networks, members, and organization are described in Attachment 1. The following progress reports from the members of the USNRDN were distributed prior to the meeting and are given as Attachment 2. (1) Measurements and Development of Analytic Techniques for Basic Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Applications; (2) Nuclear Reaction Data Activities at the National Nuclear Data Center; (3) Studies of nuclear reactions at very low energies; (4) Nuclear Reaction Data Activities, Nuclear Data Group; (5) Progress in Neutron Physics at Los Alamos - Experiments; (6) Nuclear Reaction Data Activities in Group T2; (7) Progress Report for the US Nuclear Reaction Data Network Meeting; (8) Nuclear Astrophysics Research Group (ORNL); (9) Progress Report from Ohio University; (10) Exciton Model Phenomenology; and (11) Progress Report for Coordination Meeting USNRDN.

NONE

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Summary of technical information and agreements from Nuclear Management and Resources Council industry reports addressing license renewal  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In about 1990, the Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) submitted for NRC review ten industry reports (IRs) addressing aging issues associated with specific structures and components of nuclear power plants ad one IR addressing the screening methodology for integrated plant assessment. The NRC staff had been reviewing the ten NUMARC IRs; their comments on each IR and NUMARC responses to the comments have been compiled as public documents. This report provides a brief summary of the technical information and NUMARC/NRC agreements from the ten IRs, except for the Cable License Renewal IR. The technical information and agreements documented herein represent the status of the NRC staffs review when the NRC staff and industry resources were redirected to address rule implementation issues. The NRC staff plans to incorporate appropriate technical information and agreements into the draft standard review plan for license renewal.

Regan, C.; Lee, S. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States). Div. of Reactor Program Management; Chopra, O.K.; Ma, D.C.; Shack, W.J. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

The U.S. Nuclear Data Network: Summary of the twenty-first meeting  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The following progress reports and related documents from the members of the US Nuclear Data Network (USNDN) are included at attachments: INEL Decay Data and Mass-chain Evaluation Project; Decay-data Evaluation Project; Isotopes Project Report; Report on High-spin Data Evaluations; The NNDC Activity Report, Parts A and B; Nuclear Science References (NSR) Task Force Report; Status of Mass Chains A = 1 to 266; Nuclear Data Project Activity Report; and TUNL Nuclear Data Evaluation Project Report; The progress report of the Center for Nuclear Information Technology; An Overview of the USNDN; Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File-Status; Report on High-spin Evaluations for ENSDF since November 1994; The High-spin Data and the Workshop on Data Analysis; Decay Data Evaluation Project; Compilation of High Energy Heavy-ion and Electron Interaction Data; Dissemination/code development update; 8th Edition of the Table of Isotopes/VuENSDF; Bits of Power-Issues in the Transborder Flow of Scientific and Technical Data; Data activities at the Center for Nuclear Information Technology (CNIT), San Jose State University; The Agenda and the Minutes of the Formats and Procedures Subcommittee of the NSDD; A status report on the US Nuclear Reaction Data Network (USNRDN); Coordination/Cooperation and Communication as applied to the USNDN; Nuclear Structure Data Evaluations: Issues/Concerns; Electronic Publishing of Nuclear Data; The status of the Nuclear Astrophysics Data Project; and Nuclear Astrophysics Data needs for A=3-20/Possible contributions by TUNL. The attendees formed the three Discussion Groups. The charge to these Discussion Groups was how to achieve the goal of the USNDN to make the ENSDF and the NSR the best nuclear structure and bibliographic databases available, while maintaining a proper balance between evaluations and data dissemination.

NONE

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

A summary of the Third Information Exchange Meeting on the nuclear production of hydrogen  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has organised three international exchange meetings on hydrogen production through nuclear power. The most recent meeting was held in October 2005 in Oarai, Japan, and was sponsored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. The two-and-a-half-day conference covered a full range of topics related to the nuclear production of hydrogen. Presentations were made and discussions were held on the economic prospects of a hydrogen economy and nuclear power's potential role in it, global research and development activities related to hydrogen production technologies, the coupling of hydrogen production facilities to nuclear heat sources, and basic and applied science supporting nuclear hydrogen generation. The meeting presentations are available at: http://www.nea.fr/html/science/hydro/iem3/.

Mark C. Petri; Ryutaro Hino; Isao Yamagishi

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

2012 Annual Planning Summary for NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation.

244

Summary Report for the Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School 2012  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) hosted students from across the United States at the inaugural Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School from June 11 22, 2012. The summer school provided students with a unique understanding of nuclear security challenges faced in the field and exposed them to the technical foundations, analyses, and insight that will be required by future leaders in technology development and implementation. The course heavily emphasized laboratory and field demonstrations including direct measurements of special nuclear material. The first week of the summer school focused on the foundational knowledge required by technology practitioners; the second week focused on contemporary applications. Student evaluations and feedback from student advisors indicates that the summer school achieved its objectives of 1) exposing students to the range of nuclear security applications for which radiation detection is necessary, 2) articulating the relevance of student research into the broader context, and 3) exciting students about the possibility of future careers in nuclear security.

Runkle, Robert C.; Baciak, James E.; Stave, Jean A.

2012-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

245

Environmental impact of natural emissions: summary of an APCA International Specialty Conference  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Because man now influences the chemistry of the biosphere in so many important ways, it is essential that we understand the complex interrelationships among the chemicals from natural as well as anthropogenic sources and the factors that influence their life cycles. One important grouping of chemical species which influence the atmosphere are the naturally occurring compounds of sulfur, hydrocarbons, halocarbons and nitrogen. While significant efforts have been directed toward the control of similar anthropogenic air pollutants, very limited support has been provided for developing an understanding of the role of natural emissions in air pollution control. Based on the realization that there may be specific cases where control of anthropogenic sources may have only minimal impact on air quality problems and since resources for basic research on the impacts of natural emissions are limited, the Air Pollution Control Association through the Technical Committee on Interactions with the Total Environment sponsored an International Specialty Conference on the Environmental Impact of Natural Emissions. The following brief report is only intended to convey the flavor of the conference. The transactions of the conference will be available from APCA headquarters and are highly recommended.

Aneja, V.P.; Adams, D.F.; Pratt, C.D.

1984-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

Nature of Transactions (TI) Code | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Video Gallery Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home About Us Our Programs Defense Nuclear Security ...

247

Table B1. Summary Statistics for Natural Gas in the United States, Metric Equivalents, 2005-2009  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9 9 Table B1. Summary Statistics for Natural Gas in the United States, Metric Equivalents, 2005-2009 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Wells Producing at End of Year .... 425,887 440,516 452,945 R 476,652 493,100 Production (million cubic meters) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells .............................................. 494,748 509,577 483,238 R 442,265 420,197 From Oil Wells ................................................ 169,476 156,860 164,759 R 162,742 164,611 From Coalbed Wells ....................................... NA NA 50,400 R 56,249 55,990 From Shale Gas Wells .................................... NA NA NA 64,682 95,811 Total ................................................................. 664,223 666,438 698,397 R 725,938 736,609

248

Table B1. Summary Statistics for Natural Gas in the United States, Metric Equivalents, 2004-2008  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9 9 Table B1. Summary Statistics for Natural Gas in the United States, Metric Equivalents, 2004-2008 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Wells Producing at End of Year .... 406,147 425,887 440,516 R 452,945 478,562 Production (million cubic meters) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells .............................................. 506,454 494,748 509,577 R 483,238 510,019 From Oil Wells ................................................ 172,292 169,476 156,860 R 164,759 165,506 From Coalbed Wells ....................................... NA NA NA 50,400 53,757 Total ................................................................. 678,746 664,223 666,438 R 698,397 729,282 Repressuring .................................................... 104,819 104,759

249

Table B1. Summary Statistics for Natural Gas in the United States, Metric Equivalents, 2003-2007  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9 9 Table B1. Summary Statistics for Natural Gas in the United States, Metric Equivalents, 2003-2007 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Wells Producing at End of Year .... 393,327 406,147 425,887 R 440,516 452,768 Production (million cubic meters) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells .............................................. 506,356 506,454 494,748 R 509,577 530,629 From Oil Wells ................................................ 176,617 172,292 169,476 R 156,860 165,699 Total ................................................................. 682,973 678,746 664,223 R 666,438 696,328 Repressuring .................................................... 100,462 104,819 104,759 92,453 107,274 Vented and Flared ............................................

250

Table B1. Summary Statistics for Natural Gas in the United States, Metric Equivalents, 2002-2006  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 5 Table B1. Summary Statistics for Natural Gas in the United States, Metric Equivalents, 2002-2006 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells Producing at End of Year .................................. 387,772 393,327 406,147 R 425,887 448,641 Production (million cubic meters) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells .............................................. 503,894 506,356 506,454 R 494,748 508,075 From Oil Wells ................................................ 174,047 176,617 172,292 R 169,476 157,583 Total ................................................................. 677,942 682,973 678,746 R 664,223 665,657 Repressuring .................................................... 97,839 100,462 104,819 R 104,759 92,453 Vented and Flared

251

Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves as of 12/31 (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Feet) Feet) Data Series: Dry Natural Gas Wet NG Wet Nonassociated NG Wet Associated-Dissolved NG Natural Gas Liquids Period: Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History U.S. 211,085 237,726 244,656 272,509 304,625 334,067 1925-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 15,360 14,439 13,546 12,552 11,765 10,420 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 811 805 704 739 724 710 1977-2011 Gulf of Mexico 14,549 13,634 1992-2007 Louisiana & Alabama 11,824 11,090 10,450 9,362 8,896 8,156 1981-2011 Texas 2,725 2,544 2,392 2,451 2,145 1,554 1981-2011 Alaska 10,245 11,917 7,699 9,101 8,838 9,424 1977-2011

252

Summary Report of the INL-JISEA Workshop on Nuclear Hybrud Energy Systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Hybrid energy systems utilize two or more energy resources as inputs to two or more physically coupled subsystems to produce one or more energy commodities as outputs. Nuclear hybrid energy systems can be used to provide load-following electrical power to match diurnal to seasonal-scale changes in power demand or to compensate for the variability of renewable wind or solar generation. To maintain economical, full rate operation of the nuclear reactor, its thermal energy available when power demand is low could be diverted into making synthetic vehicle fuels of various types. The Institute for Nuclear Energy Science and Technology (INEST) and the Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) co-sponsored an international workshop to identify research topics important in advancing the potential use of hybrid systems with a specific focus on nuclear-renewable hybrid systems. The workshop included presentations ranging from energy challenges and research and development (R&D) directions being pursued by nations to multiple options for hybrid systems. Those options include one that is being commercialized to other opportunities and analysis results quantifying them. The workshop also involved two breakout sessions - one focused on thermal energy management issues especially at unit-operation scale and the second focused on system operations issues including system controls, regulatory issues, technical and economic analysis, and market challenges. A discussion involving the full group focused on more general issues such as societal involvement and participation. Key criteria for selecting hybrid energy system projects and metrics for comparing them were also identified by the full group. The workshop's findings are being used initially by INEST to define topics for a research preproposal solicitation.

Mark Antkowiak; Richard Boardman; Shannon Bragg-Sitton; Robert Cherry; Mark Ruth

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

Is natural background or radiation from nuclear power plants leukemogenic  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective in this review is to provide some facts about normal hemopoietic cell proliferation relevant to leukemogenesis, physical, chemical, and biological facts about radiation effects with the hope that each person will be able to decide for themselves whether background radiation or emissions from nuclear power plants and facilities significantly add to the spontaneous leukemia incidence. 23 refs., 1 tab.

Cronkite, E.P.

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

Summary Report of the INL-JISEA Workshop on Nuclear Hybrid Energy Systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Institute for Nuclear Energy Science and Technology (INEST) and the Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) co-sponsored an international workshop to identify research topics important in advancing the potential use of hybrid systems with a specific focus on nuclear-renewable hybrid systems. The workshop included presentations ranging from energy challenges and research and development directions being pursued by nations to multiple options for hybrid systems. Those options include one that is being commercialized to other opportunities and analysis results quantifying them. The workshop also involved two breakout sessions--one focused on thermal energy management issues especially at unit-operation scale and the second focused on system operations issues including system controls, regulatory issues, technical and economic analysis, and market challenges. A discussion involving the full group focused on more general issues such as societal involvement and participation. Key criteria for selecting hybrid energy system projects and metrics for comparing them were also identified by the full group.

Antkowiak, M.; Ruth, M.; Boardman, R.; Bragg-Sitton, S.; Cherry, R.; Shunn, L.

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

255

Understanding the nature of nuclear power plant risk  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper describes the evolution of understanding of severe accident consequences from the non-mechanistic assumptions of WASH-740 to WASH-1400, NUREG-1150, SOARCA and today in the interpretation of the consequences of the accident at Fukushima. As opposed to the general perception, the radiological human health consequences to members of the Japanese public from the Fukushima accident will be small despite meltdowns at three reactors and loss of containment integrity. In contrast, the radiation-related societal impacts present a substantial additional economic burden on top of the monumental task of economic recovery from the nonnuclear aspects of the earthquake and tsunami damage. The Fukushima accident provides additional evidence that we have mis-characterized the risk of nuclear power plant accidents to ourselves and to the public. The human health risks are extremely small even to people living next door to a nuclear power plant. The principal risk associated with a nuclear power plant accident involves societal impacts: relocation of people, loss of land use, loss of contaminated products, decontamination costs and the need for replacement power. Although two of the three probabilistic safety goals of the NRC address societal risk, the associated quantitative health objectives in reality only address individual human health risk. This paper describes the types of analysis that would address compliance with the societal goals. (authors)

Denning, R. S. [Ohio State Univ., 201 West 19th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1142 (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

256

Table 10. Summary of U.S. natural gas imports by point of entry, 2007-2011  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7 7 Table 10. Summary of U.S. natural gas imports by point of entry, 2007-2011 (volumes in million cubic feet, prices in dollars per thousand cubic feet) See footnotes at end of table. Pipeline (Canada) Eastport, ID 704,429 6.31 688,782 7.88 693,892 3.86 708,806 4.19 606,099 3.90 Calais, ME 106,643 7.57 121,295 9.77 114,081 4.48 131,035 4.94 149,736 4.40 Detroit, MI 81 8.28 753 6.58 21 4.53 79 8.37 19 5.17 Marysville, MI 876 7.59 2,252 8.59 5,651 3.80 5,694 4.44 9,946 4.42 St. Clair, MI 9,633 6.97 9,104 10.03 6,544 5.10 5,591 4.97 5,228 4.29 Noyes, MN 499,863 6.72 476,948 8.48 478,368 4.21 447,079 4.49 544,135 4.15 Warroad, MN 4,813 6.75 4,800 8.50 4,380 4.24 4,325 4.69 4,551 4.17

257

Table B1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, metric equivalents, 2008-2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6 6 Table B1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, metric equivalents, 2008-2012 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Wells Producing at End of Year 476,652 493,100 487,627 514,637 482,822 Production (million cubic meters) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells 428,565 408,167 375,127 348,044 360,663 From Oil Wells 158,841 160,673 165,220 167,294 140,725 From Coalbed Wells 57,263 56,922 54,277 50,377 43,591 From Shale Gas Wells 81,268 112,087 164,723 240,721 291,566 Total 725,938 737,849 759,347 806,436 836,545 Repressuring 103,034 99,734 97,172 95,295 92,304 Vented and Flared 4,726 4,682 4,699 5,931 6,027 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 20,351 20,431 23,693 24,577 21,573

258

Table 9. Summary of U.S. natural gas imports by point of entry, 2008-2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6 6 Table 9. Summary of U.S. natural gas imports by point of entry, 2008-2012 (volumes in million cubic feet, prices in dollars per thousand cubic feet) See footnotes at end of table. Pipeline (Canada) Eastport, ID 688,782 7.88 693,892 3.86 708,806 4.19 606,099 3.90 634,194 2.59 Calais, ME 121,295 9.77 114,081 4.48 131,035 4.94 149,736 4.40 76,540 3.44 Detroit, MI 753 6.58 21 4.53 79 8.37 19 5.17 0 -- Marysville, MI 2,252 8.59 5,651 3.80 5,694 4.44 9,946 4.42 8,099 2.99 St. Clair, MI 9,104 10.03 6,544 5.10 5,591 4.97 5,228 4.29 3,531 2.64 Noyes, MN 476,948 8.48 478,368 4.21 447,079 4.49 544,135 4.15 401,717 2.86 Warroad, MN 4,800 8.50 4,380 4.24 4,325 4.69 4,551 4.17 4,610 3.06

259

Table 11. Summary of U.S. natural gas exports by point of exit, 2008-2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1 1 Table 11. Summary of U.S. natural gas exports by point of exit, 2008-2012 (volumes in million cubic feet, prices in dollars per thousand cubic feet) See footnotes at end of table. Pipeline (Canada) Eastport, ID 252 7.43 113 4.49 12 5.85 10 4.74 0 -- Calais, ME 0 -- 2,131 5.62 452 4.53 1,028 4.46 6,952 4.30 Detroit, MI 27,220 8.37 43,980 4.01 44,275 4.69 43,690 4.26 50,347 3.10 Marysville, MI 8,756 7.48 14,925 4.85 22,198 4.87 41,964 4.48 42,866 3.18 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 3,122 8.75 2,044 5.04 4,011 5.27 9,555 4.23 24,913 3.20 St. Clair, MI 492,235 8.96 612,369 4.62 650,590 4.86 781,058 4.45 754,494 3.11 Noyes, MN 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 3,975 3.90 11,768 3.46 Babb, MT 0 -- 0

260

Iowa Natural Gas Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4.79 5.12 5.57 4.93 4.84 4.93 1989-2013 4.79 5.12 5.57 4.93 4.84 4.93 1989-2013 Residential 8.74 10.17 13.06 14.85 16.00 NA 1989-2013 Commercial 6.66 7.31 8.29 7.93 8.02 NA 1989-2013 Industrial 5.00 5.14 5.17 4.65 4.64 4.79 2001-2013 Electric Power 6.10 4.82 4.44 4.12 3.99 4.38 2002-2013 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Total Capacity 288,210 288,210 288,210 288,210 288,210 288,210 2002-2013 Gas in Storage 209,512 215,593 221,664 230,749 245,317 261,998 1990-2013 Base Gas 197,897 197,897 197,897 197,897 197,897 197,897 1990-2013 Working Gas 11,615 17,696 23,768 32,853 47,421 64,102 1990-2013 Injections 228 6,604 6,409 9,737 15,463 16,682 1990-2013 Withdrawals 1,655 523 337 651 895 1 1990-2013 Net Withdrawals 1,427 -6,081 -6,072 -9,085 -14,568 -16,681 1990-2013

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Louisiana Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

02 8.73 3.82 4.23 1967-2010 02 8.73 3.82 4.23 1967-2010 Imports 6.98 9.76 3.89 4.84 7.57 7.98 1989-2012 Exports -- -- -- 7.07 9.63 11.80 2007-2012 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.22 9.58 5.96 5.43 5.67 3.48 1984-2012 Residential 14.20 15.49 13.15 11.73 11.37 11.54 1967-2012 Commercial 11.83 13.52 10.46 9.88 9.36 8.44 1967-2012 Industrial 7.08 9.32 4.31 4.68 4.25 2.96 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 12.00 13.02 8.58 11.14 10.58 10.53 1990-2012 Electric Power 7.53 10.01 4.35 4.79 W 2.99 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 10,045 11,573 20,688 29,277 30,358 1981-2011 Adjustments 192 -71 319 -612 178 1981-2011 Revision Increases 1,011 1,387 1,863 3,149 3,755 1981-2011

262

Hawaii Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Citygate Citygate 17.37 27.15 17.82 22.94 31.58 32.39 1984-2012 Residential 34.05 44.57 36.37 44.50 55.28 52.86 1980-2012 Commercial 28.31 39.01 30.00 36.55 45.58 47.03 1980-2012 Industrial 18.66 26.74 19.05 24.10 29.80 30.89 1997-2012 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2012 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 2,850 2,702 2,607 2,627 2,619 2,689 1997-2012 Pipeline & Distribution Use 3 2 2 2 2 3 2004-2012 Delivered to Consumers 2,848 2,700 2,605 2,625 2,616 2,687 1997-2012 Residential 509 499 510 509 486 481 1980-2012 Commercial 1,836 1,769 1,752 1,777 1,768 1,850 1980-2012 Industrial 502 431 344 339 362 355 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 1997-2012 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- --

263

Arkansas Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6.61 8.72 3.43 3.84 1967-2010 6.61 8.72 3.43 3.84 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.55 8.88 7.86 6.76 6.27 5.36 1984-2012 Residential 13.08 14.09 13.39 11.53 11.46 11.82 1967-2012 Commercial 10.07 11.32 10.72 8.89 8.90 7.99 1967-2012 Industrial 9.51 10.56 8.44 7.28 7.44 6.38 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 8.39 -- -- -- -- 9.04 1994-2012 Electric Power 7.04 9.23 4.14 5.11 W 3.19 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 3,305 5,626 10,869 14,178 16,370 1977-2011 Adjustments -27 -64 5 -34 728 1977-2011 Revision Increases 321 1,249 1,912 1,072 631 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 146 189 621 301 324 1977-2011 Sales 298 19 54 393 6,760 2000-2011 Acquisitions 280 5 36 807 6,880 2000-2011

264

Natural Gas Exports (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

822,454 963,263 1,072,357 1,136,789 1,505,650 1,618,828 1973-2012 822,454 963,263 1,072,357 1,136,789 1,505,650 1,618,828 1973-2012 Alaska 48,396 39,164 30,536 30,100 16,398 9,342 1982-2012 Arizona 16,207 46,581 44,152 44,693 45,086 46,385 1982-2012 California 96,757 109,127 101,422 43,278 94,433 110,656 1982-2012 Idaho 0 252 113 12 10 0 1999-2012 Louisiana 0 0 0 22,814 38,552 7,655 2007-2012 Maine 0 0 2,131 452 1,028 6,952 2007-2012 Michigan 455,216 531,333 673,318 721,075 876,267 872,620 1982-2012 Minnesota 0 0 0 0 3,975 11,768 1999-2012 Montana 20,420 16,399 12,504 9,437 6,826 4,332 1982-2012 New Hampshire 0 64 0 0 336 199 2007-2012 New York 2 0 0 0 38,783 68,843 1982-2012 North Dakota 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999-2012 Texas 178,897 209,741 195,651 257,158 374,188 474,060 1982-2012

265

Montana Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5.72 7.50 3.16 3.64 1967-2010 5.72 7.50 3.16 3.64 1967-2010 Imports 6.66 8.22 3.88 4.13 3.75 2.45 1989-2012 Exports 6.16 8.14 3.63 4.05 3.82 2.40 1989-2012 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.42 7.71 5.63 5.17 5.11 4.23 1984-2012 Residential 9.91 11.45 9.50 8.64 8.80 8.06 1967-2012 Commercial 9.76 11.32 9.41 8.54 8.66 7.98 1967-2012 Industrial 9.75 11.04 9.06 8.07 8.13 7.54 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 7.64 11.50 9.08 9.60 8.20 6.48 1990-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 1,052 1,000 976 944 778 1977-2011 Adjustments 9 -3 135 -19 -59 1977-2011 Revision Increases 92 41 132 103 43 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 74 56 210 100 97 1977-2011

266

Indiana Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

78 7.58 4.05 4.13 1967-2010 78 7.58 4.05 4.13 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.83 8.94 5.59 5.52 4.97 4.23 1984-2012 Residential 11.29 12.65 10.81 8.63 9.46 8.94 1967-2012 Commercial 10.20 11.14 9.18 7.55 8.04 7.68 1967-2012 Industrial 8.45 10.48 6.91 5.65 6.53 6.19 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 6.09 7.94 4.08 5.19 13.24 12.29 1990-2012 Electric Power 7.48 9.61 4.69 4.91 W W 1997-2012 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 2,350 525 563 620 914 819 1989-2012 Gross Withdrawals 3,606 4,701 4,927 6,802 9,075 8,814 1967-2012 From Gas Wells 3,606 4,701 4,927 6,802 9,075 8,814 1967-2012 From Oil Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2012 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2012 From Coalbed Wells

267

Oregon Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5.27 5.33 4.00 4.92 1979-2010 5.27 5.33 4.00 4.92 1979-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.14 8.82 7.79 6.78 5.84 5.21 1984-2012 Residential 14.65 13.89 14.52 12.49 11.76 11.22 1967-2012 Commercial 12.36 11.57 11.86 10.10 9.60 8.91 1967-2012 Industrial 9.30 9.07 9.70 7.05 6.84 5.87 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 6.59 8.03 7.11 5.61 4.23 4.57 1992-2012 Electric Power 6.10 7.08 4.25 4.57 W W 1997-2012 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 18 21 24 26 24 27 1989-2012 Gross Withdrawals 409 778 821 1,407 1,344 770 1979-2012 From Gas Wells 409 778 821 1,407 1,344 770 1979-2012 From Oil Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 1996-2012 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2012 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2012

268

Florida Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Wellhead Wellhead NA NA NA NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.97 9.73 5.76 5.49 5.07 3.93 1984-2012 Residential 20.61 21.07 20.18 17.89 18.16 18.31 1967-2012 Commercial 13.07 14.45 11.09 10.60 11.14 10.41 1967-2012 Industrial 10.56 11.72 9.41 8.33 8.07 6.96 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 12.82 15.56 13.16 17.98 5.56 9.83 1989-2012 Electric Power 9.35 10.41 7.90 6.54 5.86 4.80 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 108 1 7 56 6 1977-2011 Adjustments 4 79 6 64 -54 1977-2011 Revision Increases 110 0 0 0 13 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 0 183 0 0 9 1977-2011 Sales 47 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2011 Extensions 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2011

269

Ohio Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

7.59 7.88 4.36 4.63 1967-2010 7.59 7.88 4.36 4.63 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.64 10.41 6.60 6.87 5.51 4.47 1984-2012 Residential 13.47 14.53 12.68 11.13 10.78 9.91 1967-2012 Commercial 11.74 12.77 10.42 9.25 8.55 7.11 1967-2012 Industrial 10.63 12.71 8.71 7.40 6.77 5.48 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- -- -- -- 1990-2012 Electric Power 7.88 10.79 4.40 5.01 W 3.05 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 1,027 985 896 832 758 1977-2011 Adjustments 138 210 70 127 -99 1977-2011 Revision Increases 144 135 70 68 17 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 198 333 43 59 38 1977-2011 Sales 0 31 196 374 0 2000-2011 Acquisitions 0 32 79 239 4 2000-2011 Extensions

270

Nevada Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

NA NA NA NA 2006-2010 NA NA NA NA 2006-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.72 9.44 7.93 7.19 6.77 5.13 1984-2012 Residential 14.17 13.33 13.18 12.25 10.66 10.14 1967-2012 Commercial 12.03 11.21 10.92 9.77 8.07 7.43 1967-2012 Industrial 11.77 11.10 11.22 10.53 8.99 7.34 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 9.99 9.24 8.97 8.13 4.76 8.97 1991-2012 Electric Power 6.31 8.26 5.50 5.75 5.00 3.49 1997-2012 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 4 0 0 0 0 0 1996-2012 Gross Withdrawals 5 4 4 4 3 4 1991-2012 From Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2012 From Oil Wells 5 4 4 4 3 4 1991-2012 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2012 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2012 Repressuring 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2012

271

Oklahoma Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6.24 7.56 3.53 4.71 1967-2010 6.24 7.56 3.53 4.71 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.14 8.40 7.15 6.18 5.67 5.00 1984-2012 Residential 12.06 12.32 11.39 11.12 10.32 11.10 1967-2012 Commercial 10.94 11.54 10.59 9.77 8.94 8.95 1967-2012 Industrial 9.18 13.03 12.53 8.23 7.37 7.65 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 12.83 11.01 9.69 8.18 10.98 9.13 1991-2012 Electric Power 6.69 8.18 3.92 4.84 W 3.04 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 19,031 20,845 22,769 26,345 27,830 1977-2011 Adjustments 13 99 984 -394 -368 1977-2011 Revision Increases 2,115 2,786 2,894 3,224 5,142 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 1,366 2,580 3,592 3,474 6,856 1977-2011 Sales 1,545 395 600 219 2,995 2000-2011

272

Missouri Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1967-1997 1967-1997 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.53 8.03 7.06 6.17 5.85 5.27 1984-2012 Residential 13.42 13.36 12.61 11.66 12.02 12.25 1967-2012 Commercial 11.82 12.02 10.81 10.28 9.99 9.54 1967-2012 Industrial 10.84 11.32 9.55 8.70 8.54 7.93 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 8.44 8.66 7.86 6.34 6.11 5.64 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2012 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 53 100 1989-2012 Gross Withdrawals 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2012 From Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2012 From Oil Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2012 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2012 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2012 Repressuring 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2012 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed

273

Kentucky Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

35 8.42 NA 4.47 1967-2010 35 8.42 NA 4.47 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.22 10.14 5.98 5.69 5.18 4.17 1984-2012 Residential 12.05 13.84 11.97 10.02 10.44 10.19 1967-2012 Commercial 11.29 13.25 10.89 8.61 8.79 8.28 1967-2012 Industrial 8.37 10.41 6.04 5.57 5.16 3.96 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- -- -- -- 1992-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 2,469 2,714 2,782 2,613 2,006 1977-2011 Adjustments 37 81 97 -58 -34 1977-2011 Revision Increases 62 187 126 103 178 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 152 133 760 540 639 1977-2011 Sales 4 10 0 0 100 2000-2011 Acquisitions 6 13 0 39 84 2000-2011 Extensions 373 200 713 383 4 1977-2011

274

Colorado Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4.57 6.94 3.21 3.96 1967-2010 4.57 6.94 3.21 3.96 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.23 6.98 5.09 5.26 4.94 4.26 1984-2012 Residential 8.84 9.77 8.80 8.13 8.25 8.31 1967-2012 Commercial 8.10 9.01 7.56 7.58 7.84 7.58 1967-2012 Industrial 7.21 8.76 6.57 5.84 6.42 5.79 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 8.72 13.57 9.12 10.79 9.56 11.65 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.35 7.02 4.27 5.16 4.98 W 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 21,851 23,302 23,058 24,119 24,821 1977-2011 Adjustments 136 -250 306 449 801 1977-2011 Revision Increases 3,924 3,244 1,601 2,973 2,509 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 582 3,029 4,044 3,645 2,921 1977-2011 Sales 750 747 374 242 1,244 2000-2011

275

Natural Gas Imports (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4,607,582 3,984,101 3,751,360 3,740,757 3,468,693 3,137,789 4,607,582 3,984,101 3,751,360 3,740,757 3,468,693 3,137,789 1973-2012 California 0 1,345 1,953 22,503 2,171 0 2007-2012 Georgia 170,243 135,711 142,244 106,454 75,641 59,266 1999-2012 Idaho 704,429 688,782 693,892 708,806 606,099 634,194 1982-2012 Louisiana 268,714 18,110 70,099 90,867 60,554 20,132 1982-2012 Maine 106,643 121,295 114,081 131,035 149,736 76,540 1982-2012 Maryland 148,231 25,894 72,339 43,431 13,981 2,790 1999-2012 Massachusetts 183,624 166,247 161,486 164,984 135,278 86,609 1982-2012 Michigan 10,590 12,109 12,216 11,365 15,193 11,630 1982-2012 Minnesota 504,676 481,748 482,749 451,405 548,686 406,327 1982-2012 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 5,774 0 2007-2012 Montana 779,129 666,251 502,435 706,201 679,848 754,058 1982-2012

276

Pennsylvania Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

NA NA NA NA 1967-2010 NA NA NA NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 9.35 10.39 7.81 7.04 6.28 5.52 1984-2012 Residential 14.66 16.22 14.74 12.90 12.46 11.99 1967-2012 Commercial 12.77 14.29 11.83 10.47 10.42 10.24 1967-2012 Industrial 10.64 12.09 9.19 8.23 9.86 9.58 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 10.83 8.30 5.15 3.76 3.40 7.96 1990-2012 Electric Power 8.01 10.46 4.60 5.27 4.85 3.15 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 3,361 3,577 6,985 13,960 26,529 1977-2011 Adjustments 181 -201 65 -373 -224 1977-2011 Revision Increases 326 655 668 2,892 7,077 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 418 502 502 1,938 4,872 1977-2011 Sales 4 275 52 678 799 2000-2011 Acquisitions

277

California Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6.62 8.38 3.96 4.87 1967-2010 6.62 8.38 3.96 4.87 1967-2010 Imports -- 9.15 2.83 4.76 3.57 -- 2007-2012 Exports 6.53 8.06 3.76 4.51 4.18 2.90 1997-2012 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.82 8.11 4.17 4.86 4.47 3.46 1984-2012 Residential 11.57 12.75 9.43 9.92 9.93 9.14 1967-2012 Commercial 10.20 11.75 7.75 8.30 8.29 7.05 1967-2012 Industrial 9.07 10.80 6.56 7.02 7.04 5.77 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 7.72 11.32 7.61 5.55 7.32 7.01 1990-2012 Electric Power 6.72 8.23 4.44 4.99 4.71 3.68 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 2,740 2,406 2,773 2,647 2,934 1977-2011 Adjustments 33 -6 11 10 923 1977-2011 Revision Increases 355 263 259 548 1,486 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 273 491 189 451 1,889 1977-2011

278

Nebraska Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4.86 6.22 2.97 3.98 1967-2010 4.86 6.22 2.97 3.98 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.67 8.12 5.87 5.62 5.11 4.31 1984-2012 Residential 11.15 11.11 9.34 8.95 8.84 8.68 1967-2012 Commercial 9.16 9.62 7.44 7.08 6.69 6.19 1967-2012 Industrial 7.97 9.12 6.02 5.85 5.61 4.34 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 15.10 15.29 1994-2012 Electric Power 8.97 W W W 5.74 3.93 1997-2012 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 186 322 285 276 322 270 1989-2012 Gross Withdrawals 1,560 3,083 2,916 2,255 1,980 1,328 1967-2012 From Gas Wells 1,331 2,862 2,734 2,092 1,854 1,317 1967-2012 From Oil Wells 228 221 182 163 126 11 1967-2012 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2012 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2012

279

Maryland Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Wellhead Wellhead NA NA NA NA 1967-2010 Imports 7.25 9.09 4.05 5.37 5.30 13.82 1999-2012 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 9.24 10.23 8.02 6.49 6.26 5.67 1984-2012 Residential 15.17 16.07 13.73 12.44 12.10 12.17 1967-2012 Commercial 12.30 13.12 10.87 9.87 10.29 10.00 1967-2012 Industrial 11.59 13.46 10.70 9.05 8.61 8.01 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 11.40 14.66 11.20 5.99 5.09 -- 1993-2012 Electric Power 7.89 11.16 5.42 5.77 5.44 W 1997-2012 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 7 7 7 7 8 9 1989-2012 Gross Withdrawals 35 28 43 43 34 44 1967-2012 From Gas Wells 35 28 43 43 34 44 1967-2012 From Oil Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2012 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2012 From Coalbed Wells

280

Kansas Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

69 6.85 3.16 4.23 1967-2010 69 6.85 3.16 4.23 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.27 8.85 6.12 6.08 5.53 4.74 1984-2012 Residential 12.97 13.00 11.10 10.61 9.93 10.13 1967-2012 Commercial 12.04 12.24 10.01 9.65 8.89 8.82 1967-2012 Industrial 7.17 9.42 4.59 5.49 5.28 3.95 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- -- 9.87 9.00 1994-2012 Electric Power 6.31 8.11 4.13 5.05 4.79 3.28 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 3,982 3,557 3,279 3,673 3,486 1977-2011 Adjustments 79 -6 224 140 125 1977-2011 Revision Increases 407 334 212 687 152 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 221 498 403 166 240 1977-2011 Sales 65 17 2 17 124 2000-2011 Acquisitions 63 30 1 23 122 2000-2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Alaska Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5.63 7.39 2.93 3.17 1967-2010 5.63 7.39 2.93 3.17 1967-2010 Exports 6.21 7.69 8.59 12.19 12.88 15.71 1989-2012 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1970-2005 Citygate 6.75 6.74 8.22 6.67 6.53 6.14 1988-2012 Residential 8.68 8.72 10.23 8.89 8.77 8.47 1967-2012 Commercial 7.57 8.66 9.51 8.78 8.09 8.09 1967-2012 Industrial 4.67 5.49 4.02 4.23 3.84 5.11 1997-2012 Electric Power 3.58 W W W 5.04 4.32 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 11,917 7,699 9,101 8,838 9,424 1977-2011 Adjustments 1 -3 3 1 -1 1977-2011 Revision Increases 2,147 184 1,868 622 928 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 112 4,068 108 452 206 1977-2011 Sales 10 0 5 131 36 2000-2011 Acquisitions 6 0 0 0 221 2000-2011 Extensions

282

Missouri Natural Gas Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2014 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2014 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2014 From...

283

Connecticut Natural Gas Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 View History Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Citygate 5.68 5.97 6.63 6.39 6.10 5.84 1989-2014 Residential 13.90 16.53 17.79 20.34...

284

Connecticut Natural Gas Summary  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

67-2005 Citygate 10.24 6.81 6.58 5.92 5.12 5.42 1984-2013 Residential 17.85 14.81 14.93 13.83 14.17 13.32 1967-2013 Commercial 13.81 9.92 9.55 8.48 8.40 9.20 1967-2013 Industrial...

285

Wyoming Natural Gas Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6.86 3.40 4.30 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.02 4.89 5.04 4.65 4.03 4.51 1984-2013 Residential 10.16 9.39 8.58 8.72 8.42 8.27 1967-2013 Commercial...

286

Summary-Final.PDF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SUMMARY SUMMARY June 2000 1 SUMMARY This document constitutes the first edition of a long-term research and development (R&D) plan for nuclear technology in the United States. Introduction In 1998, DOE established the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee (NERAC) to provide advice to the Secretary and to the Director, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology (NE), on the broad range of non-defense DOE nuclear technology programs. The NERAC recommended development of a long-range R&D program. This R&D plan is a result of that recommendation and is the first of what is expected to be an iterated series of long-range plans for nuclear energy in the Department of Energy. To develop this plan, 145 nuclear and non-nuclear scientists, engineers, and academics

287

GEOHYDROLOGICAL STUDIES FOR NUCLEAR WASTE ISOLATION AT THE HANFORD RESERVATION -- Vol. I: Executive Summary; Vol. II: Final Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NUCLEAR WASTE ISOLATION AT THE HANFORD RESERVATION Volume I:of Washington state." Rockwell Hanford Operations Topicalmodel evaluation at the Hanford nuclear waste facility."

Apps, J.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

Summary: Workshop RecommendationsArgonne National Laboratory Specialists Workshop on Basic Research Needs for Nuclear Waste Management  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Technical Paper / Argonne National Laboratory Specialists Workshop on Basic Research Needs for Nuclear Waste Management

A. M. Friedman; D. J. Lam; M. G. Seitz

289

Natural Circulation in Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Phenomena, models, and methodology for system reliability assessments  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In recent years it has been recognized that the application of passive safety systems (i.e., those whose operation takes advantage of natural forces such as convection and gravity), can contribute to simplification and potentially to improved economics of new nuclear power plant designs. In 1991 the IAEA Conference on ''The Safety of Nuclear Power: Strategy for the Future'' noted that for new plants the use of passive safety features is a desirable method of achieving simplification and increasing the reliability of the performance of essential safety functions, and should be used wherever appropriate''.

Jose Reyes

2005-02-14T23:59:59.000Z

290

Tritium Transport at the Rulison Site, a Nuclear-stimulated Low-permeability Natural Gas Reservoir  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies conducted a program in the 1960s and 1970s that evaluated technology for the nuclear stimulation of low-permeability natural gas reservoirs. The second project in the program, Project Rulison, was located in west-central Colorado. A 40-kiltoton nuclear device was detonated 2,568 m below the land surface in the Williams Fork Formation on September 10, 1969. The natural gas reservoirs in the Williams Fork Formation occur in low permeability, fractured sandstone lenses interbedded with shale. Radionuclides derived from residual fuel products, nuclear reactions, and activation products were generated as a result of the detonation. Most of the radionuclides are contained in a cooled, solidified melt glass phase created from vaporized and melted rock that re-condensed after the test. Of the mobile gas-phase radionuclides released, tritium ({sup 3}H or T) migration is of most concern. The other gas-phase radionuclides ({sup 85}Kr, {sup 14}C) were largely removed during production testing in 1969 and 1970 and are no longer present in appreciable amounts. Substantial tritium remained because it is part of the water molecule, which is present in both the gas and liquid (aqueous) phases. The objectives of this work are to calculate the nature and extent of tritium contamination in the subsurface from the Rulison test from the time of the test to present day (2007), and to evaluate tritium migration under natural-gas production conditions to a hypothetical gas production well in the most vulnerable location outside the DOE drilling restriction. The natural-gas production scenario involves a hypothetical production well located 258 m horizontally away from the detonation point, outside the edge of the current drilling exclusion area. The production interval in the hypothetical well is at the same elevation as the nuclear chimney created by the detonation, in order to evaluate the location most vulnerable to tritium migration.

C. Cooper; M. Ye; J. Chapman

2008-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

The perception of risk : a summary of studies and how they pertain to the future of nuclear energy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

One of the most interesting aspects of nuclear power is the perceived risk that the public infers from its existence. This paper explores the public's response to risk in general and specifically to nuclear power by reviewing ...

Waits, Christopher Russell

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

Evaluation of nuclear facility decommissioning projects. Three Mile Island Unit 2 reactor building decontamination. Summary status report. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document summarizes information relating to decontamination of the Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) reactor building. The report covers activities for the period of June 1, 1979 through March 29, 1985. The data collected from activity reports, reactor containment entry records, and other sources were entered into a computerized data system which permits extraction/manipulation of specific information which can be used in planning for recovery from an accident similar to that experienced at TMI-2 on March 28, 1979. This report contains summaries of man-hours, manpower, and radiation exposures incurred during decontamination of the reactor building. Support activities conducted outside of radiation areas are excluded from the scope of this report. Computerized reports included in this document are: a chronological summary listing work performed relating to reactor building decontamination for the period specified; and summary reports for each major task during the period. Each task summary is listed in chronological order for zone entry and subtotaled for the number of personnel entries, exposures, and man-hours. Manually-assembled table summaries are included for: labor and exposures by department and labor and exposures by major activity.

Doerge, D.H.; Miller, R.L.; Scotti, K.S.

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

The perception of risk : a summary of studies and how they pertain to the future of nuclear energy ; Summary of studies and how they pertain to the future of nuclear energy .  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??One of the most interesting aspects of nuclear power is the perceived risk that the public infers from its existence. This paper explores the public's (more)

Waits, Christopher Russell

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

Summary and analysis of public comments on NUREG-1317: Regulatory options for nuclear plant license renewal: Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On August 29, 1988, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on nuclear plant license renewal and solicited public comments on NUREG-1317, ''Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal.'' NUREG-1317 presents a discussion of fifteen topics involving technical, environmental, and procedural issues and poses a set of related questions. As part of its ongoing task for the NRC, The MITRE Corporation has summarized and analyzed the public comments received. Fifty-three written comments were received. Of these, 83 percent were from nuclear industry representatives; the remaining comments represented federal and state agencies, public interest groups, and a private citizen.

Ligon, D.M.; Seth, S.S.

1989-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

Evaluation of nuclear facility decommissioning projects. Three Mile Island Unit 2 reactor defueling and disassembly. Summary status report. Volume 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document summarizes information relating to the preparations for defueling the Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) reactor and disassembly activities being performed concurrently with decontamination of the facility. Data have been collected from activity reports, reactor containment entry records, and other sources and entered in a computerized data sysem which permits extraction/manipulation of specific data which can be used in planning for recovery from a loss of coolant event similar to that experienced at TMI-2 on March 28, 1979. This report contains summaries of man-hours, manpower, and radiation exposures incurred during the period of April 23, 1979 to April 16, 1985, in the completion of activities related to preparation for reactor defueling. Support activities conducted outside of radiation areas are not included within the scope of this report. Computerized reports included in this document are: A chronological summary listing work performed for the period; and summary reports for each major task undertaken in connection with the specific scope of this report. Presented in chronological order for the referenced time period. Manually-assembled table summaries are included for: Labor and exposures by department; and labor and exposures by major activity.

Doerge, D.H.; Miller, R.L.; Scotti, K.S.

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

www.crs.gov R42814 Natural Gas in the U.S. Economy: Opportunities for Growth Summary  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Due to the growth in natural gas production, primarily from shale gas, the United States is benefitting from some of the lowest prices for natural gas in the world and faces the question of how to best use this resource. Different segments of the U.S. economy have different perspectives on the role natural gas can play. Suppliers, which have become the victims of their own production success, are facing low prices that are forecast to remain low. Some companies that have traditionally produced only natural gas have even turned their attention to oil in order to improve their financial situation. Smaller companies are having a difficult time continuing operations and larger companies, including international companies, have bought into many shale gas assets. Prices have remained low even as consumption has increased, in part, because producers have raised production to meet the demand and because companies have improved efficiency and extraction techniques. Some companies, many with large production operations, have applied for permits to export natural gas. This has raised concerns from consumers of natural gas that domestic prices will rise. The debate regarding exports is ongoing. Industries that consume natural gas have seen input costs drop, and some have heralded low

Robert Pirog; Michael Ratner

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Direct Test of the Time-Independence of Fundamental Nuclear Constants Using the Oklo Natural Reactor  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

[NOTE: This 1983 preprint is being uploaded to arXiv.org after the death of its author, who supported online distribution of his work. Contact info of the submitter is at http://ilya.cc .] The positions of neutron resonances have been shown to be highly sensitive to the variation of fundamental nuclear constants. The analysis of the measured isotopic shifts in the natural fossil reactor at Oklo gives the following restrictions on the possible rates of the interaction constants variation: strong ~2x10^-19 yr^-1, electromagnetic ~5x10^-18 yr^-1, weak ~10^-12 yr^-1. These limits permit to exclude all the versions of nuclear constants contemporary variation discussed in the literature. URL: http://alexonline.info >. For more recent analyses see hep-ph/9606486, hep-ph/0205206 and astro-ph/0204069 .

Alexander I. Shlyakhter

2003-07-03T23:59:59.000Z

298

Decision Summaries  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals oha/decision-summaries Office of Hearings and Appeals 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC, 20585 202-287-1566 en Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014 http://energy.gov/oha/articles/summary-decisions-december-30-2013-january-3-2014 summary-decisions-december-30-2013-january-3-2014" class="title-link">Summary of Decisions - December 30, 2013 - January 3, 2014

299

Natural  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Summary of U.S. Natural Gas Imports and Exports, 1992-1996 Table 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Imports Volume (million cubic feet) Pipeline Canada............................. 2,094,387 2,266,751 2,566,049 2,816,408 2,883,277 Mexico .............................. 0 1,678 7,013 6,722 13,862 Total Pipeline Imports....... 2,094,387 2,268,429 2,573,061 2,823,130 2,897,138 LNG Algeria .............................. 43,116 81,685 50,778 17,918 35,325 United Arab Emirates ....... 0 0 0 0 4,949 Total LNG Imports............. 43,116 81,685 50,778 17,918 40,274 Total Imports......................... 2,137,504 2,350,115 2,623,839 2,841,048 2,937,413 Average Price (dollars per thousand cubic feet) Pipeline Canada............................. 1.84 2.02 1.86 1.48 1.96 Mexico .............................. - 1.94 1.99 1.53 2.25 Total Pipeline Imports.......

300

Applications of neural networks to monitoring and decision making in the operation of nuclear power plants. Summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Application of neural networks to monitoring and decision making in the operation of nuclear power plants is being investigated under a US Department of Energy sponsored program at the University of Tennessee. Projects include the feasibility of using neural networks for the following tasks: (1) diagnosing specific abnormal conditions or problems in nuclear power plants, (2) detection of the change of mode of operation of the plant, (3) validating signals coming from detectors, (4) review of ``noise`` data from TVA`s Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant, and (5) examination of the NRC`s database of ``Letter Event Reports`` for correlation of sequences of events in the reported incidents. Each of these projects and its status are described briefly in this paper. This broad based program has as its objective the definition of the state-of-the-art in using neural networks to enhance the performance of commercial nuclear power plants.

Uhrig, R.E. [Tennessee Univ., Knoxville, TN (United States)]|[Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1990-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Forest Plan A summary of a forum explor-  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Natural Resources and Policy William Burch Professor of Natural Resource Management Ann Camp Lecturer YFFReview #12;Issue SummaryPage 5 | Executive Summary Executive Summary Perhaps no late 20th century

302

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document contains an assessment of the first project to be completed under the U.S. Department of Energy Clean Coal Technology Program. The project was selected under Round I and is known officially as "The Demonstration of an Advanced Cyclone Coal Combustor, with Internal Sulfur, Nitrogen, and Ash Control for the Conversion of a 23 MMBtu/hour Oil-Fired Boiler to Pulverized Coal." The project was carried out by the Coal Tech Corporation over the period March 1987 February 1991 at the site of the Keeler/Dorr-Oliver Boiler Company in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. The project was a three-year demonstration scale test of a 30 MMBtu/hr air-cooled ceramic slagging cyclone combustor retrofitted to a horizontal 23-MMBtu/hr oil or natural gas-fired Keeler/Dorr-Oliver DS-9

303

Science Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

25, 2008 25, 2008 » Links Scientific Highlight Saphire Website Scripps Press Release Tracking Ebola, Scripps At the Forefront » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Revealing a Structural Weakness of the Deadly Ebolavirus summary written by Brad Plummer, SLAC Communication Office Scientists are one step closer to conquering the deadly Ebolavirus, thanks to research conducted at SSRL structural biology Beam Lines 9-2 and 11-1 and ALS Beam Line 5.02 by a team of researchers led by Erica Ollmann Saphire from The Scripps Research Institute. The results were published in the July 10 edition of the journal Nature. Using macromolecular crystallography techniques, the team solved the structure of a protein on the Ebolavirus's surface, called glycoprotein GP,

304

Cost and Performance Comparison Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Volume 3 Executive Summary: Low Rank Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Baseline Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 3 Executive Summary: Low Rank Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity September 2011 DOE/NETL-2010/1399 Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring

305

Summary of the historical development of seismic design of nuclear power plants in Japan and the U.S.  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Over the past 50 years seismic design of nuclear power plants in Japan and the U.S. have undergone very significant changes in the three activities associated with design: Quantification of seismic load and other applicable loads and specification of their load combinations to be considered in design. Analysis methods and procedures necessary to convert input earthquake motions and loads normally expressed in the form of acceleration to resultant seismic dynamic or equivalent static forces, moments or stresses, fms in structures, systems and components, SSC. Codes or standards acceptance criteria used to evaluate resultant forces, moments or stresses, fms in nuclear safety SSC to determine design adequacy. These applications to the historical development of Nuclear Power Plant, NPP designs in Japan and U.S. are summarized.

John D. Stevenson

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

FY13 Summary Report on the Augmentation of the Spent Fuel Composition Dataset for Nuclear Forensics: SFCOMPO/NF  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the FY13 efforts to enhance a dataset of spent nuclear fuel isotopic composition data for use in developing intrinsic signatures for nuclear forensics. A review and collection of data from the open literature was performed in FY10. In FY11, the Spent Fuel COMPOsition (SFCOMPO) excel-based dataset for nuclear forensics (NF), SFCOMPO/NF was established and measured data for graphite production reactors, Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs) and Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) were added to the dataset and expanded to include a consistent set of data simulated by calculations. A test was performed to determine whether the SFCOMPO/NF dataset will be useful for the analysis and identification of reactor types from isotopic ratios observed in interdicted samples.

Brady Raap, Michaele C.; Lyons, Jennifer A.; Collins, Brian A.; Livingston, James V.

2014-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

307

FY 1996 activity summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety provides nuclear safety policy, independent technical evaluation, and technical support. A summary of these activities is provided in this report. These include: (1) changing the mission of the former production facilities to storage and waste management; (2) stabilizing nuclear materials not recycled due to production cessation or interruptions; (3) reformulating the authorization basis for existing facilities to convert to a standards based approach for operations consistent with modern expectations; and (4) implementing a modern regulatory framework for nuclear facilities. Enforcement of the Price-Anderson Amendments Act is also reported.

NONE

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Natural Gas and Hydrogen Infrastructure Opportunities Workshop, October 18-19, 2011, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL : Summary Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The overall objective of the Workshop was to identify opportunities for accelerating the use of both natural gas (NG) and hydrogen (H{sub 2}) as motor fuels and in stationary power applications. Specific objectives of the Workshop were to: (1) Convene industry and other stakeholders to share current status/state-of-the-art of NG and H{sub 2} infrastructure; (2) Identify key challenges (including non-technical challenges, such as permitting, installation, codes, and standards) preventing or delaying the widespread deployment of NG and H{sub 2} infrastructure. Identify synergies between NG and H{sub 2} fuels; and (3) Identify and prioritize opportunities for addressing the challenges identified above, and determine roles and opportunities for both the government and industry stakeholders. Plenary speakers and panel discussions summarized the current status of the NG and H{sub 2} infrastructure, technology for their use in transportation and stationary applications, and some of the major challenges and opportunities to more widespread use of these fuels. Two break-out sessions of three groups each addressed focus questions on: (1) infrastructure development needs; (2) deployment synergies; (3) natural gas and fuel cell vehicles (NGVs, FCVs), specialty vehicles, and heavy-duty trucks; (4) CHP (combined heat and power), CHHP (combined hydrogen, heat, and power), and synergistic approaches; and (5) alternative uses of natural gas.

Kumar, R. comp.; Ahmed, S. comp. (Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division)

2012-02-21T23:59:59.000Z

309

Summary and bibliography of safety-related events at boiling-water nuclear power plants as reported in 1980  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document presents a bibliography that contains 100-word abstracts of event reports submitted to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission concerning operational events that occurred at boiling-water-reactor nuclear power plants in 1980. The 1547 abstracts included on microfiche in this bibliography describe incidents, failures, and design or construction deficiencies that were experienced at the facilities. These abstracts are arranged alphabetically by reactor name and then chronologically for each reactor. Full-size keyword and permuted-title indexes to facilitate location of individual abstracts are provided following the text. Tables that summarize the information contained in the bibliography are also provided. The information in the tables includes a listing of the equipment items involved in the reported events and the associated number of reports for each item. Similar information is given for the various kinds of instrumentation and systems, causes of failures, deficiencies noted, and the time of occurrence (i.e., during refueling, operation, testing, or construction).

McCormack, K.E.; Gallaher, R.B.

1982-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

Summary and bibliography of safety-related events at pressurized-water nuclear power plants as reported in 1979  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the data contained in reports submitted by licensees to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission concerning safety-related operational events that occurred at pressurized-water-reactor nuclear power plants in 1979. A bibliography containing 100-word abstracts of the event reports is included. The 2064 abstracts included in the bibliography describe incidents, failures, and design or construction deficiencies experienced at the facilities. They are arranged alphabetically by reactor name and then chronologically for each reactor. Keyword and permuted-title indexes are provided to facilitate location of the abstracts of interest. Tables summarizing the information contained in the bibliography are also presented and discussed. Information listed in the tables includes instrument failures, equipment failures, system failures, causes of failures, deficiencies noted, and time of occurrence (i.e., during refueling, operation, testing, or construction). Some of the more interesting events that occurred during the year are reviewed in detail. 33 refs.

Scott, R.L.; Gallaher, R.B.

1981-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Record of Cycling Operation of the Natural Nuclear Reactor in the Oklo/Okelobondo Area in Gabon  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Using selective laser extraction technique combined with sensitive ion-counting mass spectrometry, we have analyzed the isotopic structure of fission noble gases in U-free La-Ce-Sr-Ca aluminous hydroxy phosphate associated with the 2 billion yr old Oklo natural nuclear reactor. In addition to elevated abundances of fission-produced Zr, Ce, and Sr, we discovered high (up to 0.03??cm3???STP/g) concentrations of fission Xe and Kr, the largest ever observed in any natural material. The specific isotopic structure of xenon in this mineral defines a cycling operation for the reactor with 30-min active pulses separated by 2.5h dormant periods. Thus, nature not only created conditions for self-sustained nuclear chain reactions, but also provided clues on how to retain nuclear wastes, including fission Xe and Kr, and prevent uncontrolled runaway chain reaction.

A. P. Meshik; C. M. Hohenberg; O. V. Pravdivtseva

2004-10-27T23:59:59.000Z

312

Mobility of uranium, thorium and lanthanides around the Bangombe natural nuclear reactor (Gabon)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

New mineralogical and isotopic studies were carried out on samples form the Bangombe natural nuclear reactor. This reactor is located at shallow depth in the weathering profile and has been subjected to severe supergene alteration. Textural evidence indicates partial dissolution of uraninite in the Bangombe ore related to precipitation of Fe-Ti oxyhydroxides and clay minerals (kaolinite and metahalloysite). As a consequence of the alteration of the uraninite, uranium and fissiogenic rare earth elements were released in the clayey border of the reactor, whereas radiogenic {sup 232}Th remained confined in the close vicinity of the core. A retention effect is also evidenced, under reducing conditions, in the black shales located above the reactor.

Bros, R. [CEA CEN Cadarache, Saint Paul-lez-Durance (France); Gauthier-Lafaye, F.; Larque, P.; Samual, J.; Stille, P. [CNRS, Strasbourg (France)

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

313

Summary of the contractor information exchange meeting for improving the safety of Soviet-Designed Nuclear Power Plants, February 19, 1997  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes a meeting held on February 19, 1997, in Washington, D.C. The meeting was held primarily to exchange information among the contractors involved in the U.S. Department of Energy`s efforts to improve the safety of Soviet-designed nuclear power plants. Previous meetings have been held on December 5-6, 1995, and May 22, 1996. The meetings are sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy and coordinated by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The U.S. Department of Energy works with countries to increase the level of safety at 63 Soviet-designed nuclear reactors operating in Armenia, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, Russia, Slovakia, and Ukraine. The work is implemented largely by commercial companies and individuals who provide technologies and services to the countries with Soviet-designed nuclear power plants. Attending the meeting were 71 representatives of commercial contractors, the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Department of State, national laboratories, and other federal agencies. The presentations and discussions that occurred during the exchange are summarized in this report. While this report captures the general presentation and discussion points covered at the meeting, it is not a verbatim, inclusive record. To make the report useful, information presented at the meeting has been expanded to clarify issues, respond to attendees` requests, or place discussion points in a broader programmatic context. Appendixes A through F contain the meeting agenda, list of attendees, copies of presentation visuals and handouts, the Strategy Document discussed at the meeting, and a summary of attendees` post-meeting evaluation comments. As with past information exchanges, the participants found this meeting valuable and useful. In response to the participant`s requests, a fourth information exchange will be held later in 1997.

NONE

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

314

Inspection Summary Report | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

deterrence policy. In the early 1990s, Sandia undertook to design a replacement neutron generator for the W76 nuclear warhead. Topic: National Security and Safety Summary of...

315

DOE Annual NEPA Planning Summary report templates 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

or Field Organization " "Annual NEPA Planning Summary " "Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) Tracking" "National Nuclear Security Administration - Nevada Site Office" "application...

316

Bulk analysis of a simulated environmental sample in natural abundance performed in KAERI for nuclear safeguards  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

A highly accurate and precise analysis of ultra-trace amounts of nuclear materials contained in environmental samples plays an essential role in monitoring undeclared nuclear activities for nuclear safeguards pur...

Jong-Ho Park; Sunyoung Lee; Young-Geun Ha

2014-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

317

Appendix B: Summary Tables  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Bingaman U.S. Energy Information Administration | Analysis of Impacts of a Clean Energy Standard as requested by Chairman Bingaman Appendix B: Summary Tables Table B1. The BCES and alternative cases compared to the Reference case, 2025 2009 2025 Ref Ref BCES All Clean Partial Credit Revised Baseline Small Utilities Credit Cap 2.1 Credit Cap 3.0 Stnds + Cds Generation (billion kilowatthours) Coal 1,772 2,049 1,431 1,305 1,387 1,180 1,767 1,714 1,571 1,358 Petroleum 41 45 43 44 44 44 45 45 45 43 Natural Gas 931 1,002 1,341 1,342 1,269 1,486 1,164 1,193 1,243 1,314 Nuclear 799 871 859 906 942 889 878 857 843 826 Conventional Hydropower 274 306 322 319 300 321 316 298 312 322 Geothermal 15 25 28 25 31 24 27 22 23 24 Municipal Waste 18 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Wood and Other Biomass 38 162 303 289 295 301 241 266

318

Summary and bibliography of safety-related events at boiling-water nuclear power plants as reported in 1979  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document presents a bibliography that contains 100-word abstracts of event reports submitted to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission concerning operational events that occurred at boiling-water-reactor nuclear power plants in 1979. The 1345 abstracts included on microfiche in this bibliography describe incidents, failures, and design or construction deficiencies that were experienced at the facilities. These abstracts are arranged alphabetically by reactor name and then chronologically for each reactor. Keyword and permuted-title indexes to facilitate location of individual abstracts are provided in full size following the text. Tables that summarize the information contained in the bibliography are also provided. The information in the tables includes a listing of the equipment items involved in the reported events and the associated number of reports for each item. Similar information is given for the various kinds of instrumentation and systems, causes of the failures, deficiencies noted, and the time of occurrence (i.e., during refueling, operation, testing, or construction). Some of the more interesting events that occurred during the year are reviewed in detail. 32 refs.

Scott, R.L.; Gallaher, R.B.

1981-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

Summary of Preliminary Criticality Analysis for Peach Bottom Fuel in the DOE Standardized Spent Nuclear Fuel Canister  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy's (DOE's) National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program is developing a standardized set of canisters for DOE spent nuclear fuel (SNF). These canisters will be used for DOE SNF handling, interim storage, transportation, and disposal in the national repository. Several fuels are being examined in conjunction with the DOE SNF canisters. This report summarizes the preliminary criticality safety analysis that addresses general fissile loading limits for Peach Bottom graphite fuel in the DOE SNF canister. The canister is considered both alone and inside the 5-HLW/DOE Long Spent Fuel Co-disposal Waste Package, and in intact and degraded conditions. Results are appropriate for a single DOE SNF canister. Specific facilities, equipment, canister internal structures, and scenarios for handling, storage, and transportation have not yet been defined and are not evaluated in this analysis. The analysis assumes that the DOE SNF canister is designed so that it maintains reasonable geometric integrity. Parameters important to the results are the canister outer diameter, inner diameter, and wall thickness. These parameters are assumed to have nominal dimensions of 45.7-cm (18.0-in.), 43.815-cm (17.25-in), and 0.953-cm (0.375-in.), respectively. Based on the analysis results, the recommended fissile loading for the DOE SNF canister is 13 Peach Bottom fuel elements if no internal steel is present, and 15 Peach Bottom fuel elements if credit is taken for internal steel.

Henrikson, D.J.

1999-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

Summary of a joint US-Japan study of potential approaches to reduce the attractiveness of various nuclear materials for use in a nuclear explosive device by a terrorist group  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper summarizes the results of a joint US-Japan study to establish a mutual understanding, through scientific-based study, of potential approaches to reduce the attractiveness of various nuclear materials for use in a terrorist nuclear explosive device (NED). 4 approaches that can reduce materials attractiveness with a very high degree of effectiveness are: -) diluting HEU with natural or depleted U to an enrichment of less than 10% U-235; -) storing Pu in nuclear fuel that is not man portable and with a dose rate greater or equal to 10 Gy/h at 1 m; -) storing Pu or HEU in heavy items, i.e. not transportable, provided the removal of the Pu or HEU from the item requires a purification/processing capability; and -) converting Pu and HEU to very dilute forms (such as wastes) that, without any security barriers, would require very long acquisition times to acquire a Category I quantity of Pu or of HEU. 2 approaches that can reduce materials attractiveness with a high degree of effectiveness are: -) converting HEU-fueled research reactors into LEU-fueled research reactors or dilute HEU with natural or depleted U to an enrichment of less than 20% U-235; -) converting U/Al reactor fuel into U/Si reactor fuel. Other approaches have been assessed as moderately or totally inefficient to reduce the attractiveness of nuclear materials.

Bathke, C.G. [Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM (United States); Inoue, N.; Kuno, Y.; Mihara, T.; Sagara, H. [Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 4-49 Muramatsu, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 319-1184 (Japan); Ebbinghaus, B.B. [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box L-168, Livermore, CA 94551 (United States); Murphy, J.; Dalton, D. [National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20585 (United States); Nagayama, Y. [Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, 3-2-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8959 (Japan)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Natural glass analogues to alteration of nuclear waste glass: A review and recommendations for further study  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to review previous work on the weathering of natural glasses; and to make recommendations for further work with respect to studying the alteration of natural glasses as it relates quantifying rates of dissolution. the first task was greatly simplified by the published papers of Jercinovic and Ewing (1987) and Byers, Jercinovic, and Ewing (1987). The second task is obviously the more difficult of the two and the author makes no claim of completeness in this regard. Glasses weather in the natural environment by reacting with aqueous solutions producing a rind of secondary solid phases. It had been proposed by some workers that the thickness of this rind is a function of the age of the glass and thus could be used to estimate glass dissolution rates. However, Jercinovic and Ewing (1987) point out that in general the rind thickness does not correlate with the age of the glass owing to the differences in time of contact with the solution compared to the actual age of the sample. It should be noted that the rate of glass dissolution is also a function of the composition of both the glass and the solution, and the temperature. Quantification of the effects of these parameters (as well as time of contact with the aqueous phase and flow rates) would thus permit a prediction of the consequences of glass-fluid interactions under varying environmental conditions. Defense high- level nuclear waste (DHLW), consisting primarily of liquid and sludge, will be encapsulated by and dispersed in a borosilicate glass before permanent storage in a HLW repository. This glass containing the DHLW serves to dilute the radionuclides and to retard their dispersion into the environment. 318 refs.

McKenzie, W.F.

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

322

Evaluation of nuclear facility decommissioning projects: Summary status report: Three Mile Island Unit 2. Radioactive waste and laundry shipments  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document summarizes information concerning radioactive waste and laundry shipments from the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to radioactive waste disposal sites and to protective clothing decontamination facilities (laundries) since the loss of coolant accident experienced on March 28, 1979. Data were collected from radioactive shipment records, summarized, and placed in a computerized data information retrieval/manipulation system which permits extraction of specific information. This report covers the period of April 9, 1979 through April 19, 1987. Included in this report are: waste disposal site locations, dose rates, curie content, waste description, container type and number, volumes and weights. This information is presented in two major categories: protective clothing (laundry) and radioactive waste. Each of the waste shipment reports is in chronological order.

Doerge, D. H.; Haffner, D. R.

1988-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

323

Department of Energy plan for recovery and utilization of nuclear byproducts from defense wastes. Volume 1. Executive summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Nuclear byproducts are a major national resource that has yet to be incorporated into the economy. The current Defense Byproducts Program is designed to match specific military and commercial needs with the availability of valuable products which are currently treated as waste at considerable expense in waste management costs. This program plan focuses on a few specific areas with the greatest potential for near-term development and application. It also recognizes the need for a continuing effort to develop new applications for byproducts and to continue to assess the impacts on waste management. The entire program has been, and will continue to be structured so as to ensure the safety of the public and maintain the purity of the environment. Social and institutional concerns have been recognized and will be handled appropriately. A significant effort will be undertaken to inform the public of the benefits of byproduct use and of the care being taken to ensure safe, efficient operation.

None

1983-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

Program Summaries  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Program Summaries Program Summaries Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) News & Resources Program Summaries Brochures Reports Accomplishments Presentations BES and Congress Science for Energy Flow Seeing Matter Scale of Things Chart Contact Information Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-3081 F: (301) 903-6594 E: sc.bes@science.doe.gov More Information » News & Resources Program Summaries Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Bes Summaries 2012 thumbnail JPG .jpg file (469KB) Basic Energy Sciences FY 2012 Research Summaries This report provides a collection of research abstracts and highlights for

325

Annual Planning Summaries: 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Annual Planning Summaries: 2012 February 23, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Oak Ridge Office The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the Oak Ridge Office. February 8, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation. February 3, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Environmental Management The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Environmental Management. February 2, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

326

South Dakota Natural Gas Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View History Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Wellhead 7.22 7.94 NA NA 1979-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.35 8.06 5.21 5.54 5.21 4.67 1984-2012 Residential 10.49 11.32 9.14 8.77 8.59 8.39 1967-2012 Commercial 8.81 9.76 7.42 7.13 6.98 6.45 1967-2012 Industrial 8.32 9.00 6.07 5.92 6.25 5.37 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- -- -- -- 1991-2012 Electric Power -- 7.32 5.15 5.50 5.04 3.54 1998-2012 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 71 71 89 102 100 95 1989-2012 Gross Withdrawals 11,880 12,007 12,927 12,540 12,449 15,085 1967-2012 From Gas Wells 422 1,098 1,561 1,300 933 14,396 1967-2012 From Oil Wells 11,458 10,909 11,366 11,240 11,516 689 1967-2012

327

West Virginia Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

NA NA NA NA 1967-2010 NA NA NA NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.62 10.32 7.06 6.31 5.91 4.99 1984-2012 Residential 14.59 14.51 14.75 11.39 10.91 10.83 1967-2012 Commercial 13.37 13.54 14.24 10.27 9.65 9.39 1967-2012 Industrial 8.51 10.94 5.55 5.40 4.89 3.56 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- -- -- -- 1992-2012 Electric Power W 10.08 4.78 5.14 W 3.33 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 4,729 5,136 5,946 7,000 10,345 1977-2011 Adjustments 14 315 258 -359 -1 1977-2011 Revision Increases 310 390 383 1,034 1,218 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 359 444 865 1,075 759 1977-2011 Sales 2 160 54 895 265 2000-2011 Acquisitions 25 118 2 984 590 2000-2011

328

New York Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8.85 8.94 4.21 4.65 1967-2010 8.85 8.94 4.21 4.65 1967-2010 Imports 7.43 9.36 4.67 5.43 4.96 3.83 1989-2012 Exports 12.07 -- -- -- 4.69 3.61 1999-2012 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 9.02 10.07 7.35 6.86 6.04 5.35 1984-2012 Residential 15.73 16.78 15.05 14.04 13.71 12.97 1967-2012 Commercial 11.82 12.86 10.72 10.88 9.32 7.84 1967-2012 Industrial 11.43 12.30 9.52 8.55 8.18 6.92 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 13.45 18.54 11.87 8.32 9.81 21.00 1990-2012 Electric Power 8.09 10.85 5.26 5.73 5.56 3.95 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 376 389 196 281 253 1977-2011 Adjustments 33 -11 -84 104 -22 1977-2011 Revision Increases 46 72 39 35 48 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 45 47 59 83 50 1977-2011

329

New Mexico Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6.88 8.40 4.17 5.32 1967-2010 6.88 8.40 4.17 5.32 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.45 7.05 4.07 4.84 4.52 3.70 1984-2012 Residential 11.99 12.23 9.53 9.63 9.14 8.69 1967-2012 Commercial 10.04 10.39 7.52 7.47 6.98 6.31 1967-2012 Industrial 8.54 10.27 5.41 6.17 6.22 4.87 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 5.77 -- 3.77 4.46 9.43 10.11 1994-2012 Electric Power W 8.18 W W W W 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 17,245 16,285 15,598 15,412 15,005 1977-2011 Adjustments 136 -6 525 -89 73 1977-2011 Revision Increases 2,534 2,735 1,396 2,211 2,114 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 2,431 2,657 1,708 1,833 2,229 1977-2011 Sales 570 402 287 145 1,016 2000-2011 Acquisitions

330

South Dakota Natural Gas Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View History Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Citygate 4.65 5.22 5.92 5.49 5.15 5.26 1989-2013 Residential 8.00 9.08 11.46 13.17 13.86 13.81 1989-2013 Commercial 6.38 6.76 7.55 8.06 7.62 7.69 1989-2013 Industrial 5.71 5.84 6.12 6.46 6.27 6.11 2001-2013 Electric Power 4.62 5.61 5.49 4.06 4.06 4.15 2002-2013 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2013 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2006-2013 Repressuring NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013

331

Guide for the Mitigation of Natural Phenomena Hazards for DOE Nuclear Facilities and NonNuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This document provides guidance in implementing the Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) mitigation requirements of DOE O 420.1, Facility Safety, Section 4.4, "Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation." This Guide does not establish or invoke any new requirements. Any apparent conflicts arising from the NPH guidance would defer to the requirements in DOE O 420.1. No cancellation.

2000-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

332

Science Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

BL6-2C BL9-3 BL10-2 Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Imaging Mercury in the Rhizosphere of Wetland Plants summary written by Raven Hanna High levels of...

333

Science Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Press Release Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Reducing Fuel Cell Costs by Changing the Structure and Reactivity of Platinum summary written by Raven...

334

Fire Protection Program: Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Summary Summary Since May 1950, an Annual Fire Protection Program Summary has been submitted by DOE's fire protection community. Currently, this report is required by section 5a.(8) of DOE Order 231.1. "Environment, Safety and Health Reporting." In 1999, an automation initiative was undertaken to streamline data collection and provide a more through review of DOE Reporting Element activities. This action resulted in the delayed publications of the CY 1999 and 2000 reports until 2002. It is now possible however to view all Annual Summary Reporting Element responses since 1991 at the Site, Operations, Lead Program Secretarial Office and Headquarters levels. Additionally, a build-in reference to other DOE reporting activities (CAIRS and ORPS) is available that allows Reporting Elements and managers the opportunity to review all fire protection events along previously mentioned categories. Reports listed below were generated from this application. To obtain a copy of the Annual Summary Application please contact Jim Bisker in the Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy (EH-53) at (301)903-6542 or Jim Bisker.

335

Environmental consequences of postulated plutonium releases from Exxon Nuclear MOFP, Richland, Washington, as a result of severe natural phenomena  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Potential environmental consequences in terms of radiation dose to people are presented for postulated plutonium releases caused by severe natural phenomena at the Exxon Nuclear Company Mixed Oxide Fabrication Plant (MOFP), Richland, Washington. The severe natural phenomena considered are earthquakes, tornadoes, high straight-line winds, and floods. Maximum plutonium deposition values are given for significant locations around the site. All important potential exposure pathways are examined. The most likely 50-year committed dose equivalents are given for the maximum-exposed individual and the population within a 50-mile radius of the plant. The maximum plutonium deposition values most likely to occur offsite are also given.

Jamison, J.D.; Watson, E.C.

1980-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Energynet Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Project Summary Project Summary HELP Index Summary Scenario Reference Student Pages Subject/Content Area: Physical science/electricity, geometry and applied mathematics Target Audience: Middle school level - all students including gifted, learning-disabled, behavior-disordered and limited English proficient Project Goals: As a result of their participation in the Activating the EnergyNet project, the students will develop the abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry. They will increase their understanding of factors affecting energy cost and consumption, including the impact of energy production on the environment and the available technology and conversion costs. Students will use problem-solving strategies to design and implement interventions, assess the outcome, share data and strategies with other schools, and present

337

Radionuclides in the NaturalAnthropogenic System Comprising a Nuclear Power Plant and a Cooling Reservoir  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The sources of technological radionuclides coming into the ecosystem of a nuclear power plant (NPP) cooling reservoir are considered and estimated. The information ... The activity reserve in the ecosystems of th...

Yu. A. Egorov

2002-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Microsoft Word - Summary.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0-S1 0-S1 April 2011 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico Summary Past Past Present Present Future Future Conceptual Drawing CMRR Facility AVAILABILITY OF THE DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE NUCLEAR FACILITY PORTION OF THE CHEMISTRY AND METALLURGY

339

Executive Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Executive Summary Executive Summary Highway-based excise taxes are paid by highway users, and the tax revenues are distributed to States for supporting highways, safety, and transit programs. The processes for collecting these taxes and redistributing them to the States are very complex. The U.S. Treasury collects most of the taxes from a relatively small number of large corporations located in only a few States. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) does not have an accurate picture of where the motor fuel is eventually consumed. Because the actual State-by-State contributions are not available, detailed analyses are required to estimate a State's on-highway motor fuel use. The attribution process uses State-reported data and nationally applied statistical models to determine how much fuel is used on highways in each State and the proportion of each State's usage in comparison to the total motor fuel usage for all States.

340

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

FUSION ENERGY SCIENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FUSION ENERGY SCIENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Panel on High Energy Density Laboratory Plasmas ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF HIGH ENERGY DENSITY LABORATORY PLASMAS January 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................... 5 1 HIGH ENERGY DENSITY LABORATORY PLASMA SCIENCE .................................... 15 2 THE CHARGE TO FESAC ...................................................................................... 19 3 THE PANEL PROCESS ............................................................................................ 20 4 STEWARDSHIP OF THE JOINT PROGRAM ............................................................... 23

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

TEC Meeting Summaries - April 2005 Presentations | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 2005 Presentations April 2005 Presentations TEC Meeting Summaries - April 2005 Presentations Phoenix, Arizona Presentations (April 2005) Documents Available for Download Plenary I - United States Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Plenary I - National Academies Update Plenary I - Transportation Resources Exchange Center Plenary I - Transportation Communications Plenary II - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Plenary II - Yucca Mountain Transportation Plenary II - Main Yankee Reactor Vessel Removal & Barge Transport Plenary III - Accomplishments and Future Topic Group Summaries - TEC Rail Topic Group Summary Topic Group Summaries - Section 180(c) Group Update Topic Group Summaries - Security Topic Group Update Topic Group Summaries - Tribal Topic Group Update Program Updates - Department of Energy Environmental Management

342

Microsoft Word - Annual FP Summary Information Reporting Guide...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

or other nuclear accident, miscellaneous accidents (such as thermal, chemical, or corrosion-related accidents). Summaries should include information on the actuation of any...

343

FY 2008 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary ...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing...

344

FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile...

345

3116 Public Meeting Summaries - November 2006 | Department of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2006 3116 Public Meeting Summaries - November 2006 The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States Department Of Energy Public Meeting Discussion of the...

346

FY 2013 Summary Report: Post-Irradiation Examination of Zircaloy...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Examination of Zircaloy-4 Samples in Target Capsules and Initiation of Bending Fatigue Testing for Used Nuclear Fuel Vibration Integrity Investigations FY 2013 Summary Report:...

347

EIS-0373: Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Summary | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Impact Statement, Summary Proposed Consolidation of Nuclear Operations Related to Production of Radioisotope Power Systems The purpose and need for agency action is to...

348

FY 2006 Summary Table by Appropriation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appropriation Account Summary Appropriation Account Summary (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Energy And Water Development Energy Programs Energy supply....................................................................... Non-Defense site acceleration completion........................... Uranium enrichment D&D fund............................................ Non-Defense environmental services................................... Science................................................................................. Nuclear waste disposal......................................................... Departmental administration.................................................

349

Executive Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Worker Safety and Health Program LBNL/PUB-3851, Rev. 2.2 (March 2012) Worker Safety and Health Program LBNL/PUB-3851, Rev. 2.2 (March 2012) Worker Safety and Health Program Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LBNL Worker Safety and Health Program LBNL/PUB-3851, Rev. 2.2 (March 2012) This page intentionally left blank. LBNL Worker Safety and Health Program LBNL/PUB-3851, Rev. 2.2 (March 2012) i Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................. v 1. Introduction................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Work Activities .............................................................................................. 1

350

Microsoft Word - Summary.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary Summary To submit questions regarding this CMRR-NF SEIS, or to request a copy, please contact: AVAILABILITY OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE NUCLEAR FACILITY PORTION OF THE CHEMISTRY AND METALLURGY RESEARCH BUILDING REPLACEMENT PROJECT AT LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY, LOS ALAMOS, NEW MEXICO (CMRR-NF SEIS) Printed with soy ink on recycled paper John Tegtmeier, EIS Document Manager Los Alamos Site Office National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department of Energy 3747 West Jemez Road Los Alamos, NM 87544 Telephone: 505-665-0113 Conceptual Drawing CMRR Facility Past Present Future Past Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Nuclear Facility Portion of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building Replacement Project

351

E-Print Network 3.0 - astronomy nuclear transition Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering Summary: EPSRCSTFC Review of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Engineering A report prepared for EPSRC and STFC... of the scope of RCUK funded...

352

Natural convection phenomena in a nuclear power plant during a postulated TMLB' accident  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

After the TMI (Three Mile Island) accident, there has been significant interest in analyzing and understanding the phenomena that may occur in a PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor) accident which may lead to partial or total core meltdown and degradation. Natural convection is one of the important phenomena. In the present paper the results of two numerical simulations of (1) four-loop PWR and (2) three-loop PWR are presented. The simulations were performed with the COMMIX(2) computer code. Our analysis shows that in severe accident scenarios, natural convection phenomena does occur and that it helps to delay core degradation by transferring decay heat from the reactor core to other internal structures of the reactor system. The amount of heat transfer and delay in core degradation depends on the geometry and internal structures of the system and on the events of an accident.

Domanus, H.M.; Schmitt, R.C.; Sha, W.T.; Shah, V.L.; Han, J.T.

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

353

Science Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

July 30, 2009 July 30, 2009 » Links Scientific Highlight Center for Advanced Molecular Photovoltaics, Stanford University » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Molecular Mixing in Organic Solar Cells summary written by Raven Hanna Solar panels contain a number of solar cells that convert light into electricity. Solar cells are traditionally made of crystalline silicon, which presently have 15-20% efficiency in conversion of light into electricity. However, these traditional cells are bulky and have high production costs that can take 5-7 years of solar panel operation to recover. Using solar cells made from organic materials could lower their production costs. This would lessen the time it takes for solar panels to generate more energy than consumed during production and would also result

354

Science Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

pseudogap image pseudogap image » Links Scientific Highlight SIMES Shen Lab SLAC Today Article » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Scientists Find Unexpected Electron Behavior in the Pseudogap of High-temperature Superconductors summary written by Raven Hanna Superconductivity is a hot topic in physics for good reason. With an electrical resistance of zero, superconductors transport electrical current with no loss of energy. Unfortunately, scientists have only found materials to be superconducting at very low temperatures, much too low for widespread use. In the 1980s, scientists discovered a class of "high-temperature" superconductors that can be used at the temperature of liquid nitrogen (~-200°C). This discovery has raised scientists' hopes that materials may

355

Science Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hasan Research Hasan Research Princeton News Release » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Macroscopic Quantum Insulator State Observed summary written by Raven Hanna One of the strangest consequences of quantum mechanics is the seemingly instantaneous communication of subatomic particles over long distances. Known as quantum entanglement, pairs or groups of particles can become linked so that any changes made to one will cause the others to respond quicker than the time it takes for light to travel between them. Scientists are interested in finding a material that shows quantum entanglement on a macroscopic scale but which is neither a superconductor nor a superfluid. Dubbed a topological insulator, this theorized, exotic state of matter would have unusual conducting properties. For example,

356

Science Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

03, 2008 03, 2008 » Links Scientific Highlight Tainer Website Scripps Press Release » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Role of Specific Protein Mutations in Causing Human Disease Revealed summary written by Brad Plummer, SLAC Communication Office Scientists are one step closer to understanding a piece of the machinery involved in DNA transcription and repair, thanks to work done in part at the SSRL macromolecular crystallography Beam Line 11-1. The team, led by The Scripps Research Institute researcher John Tainer, and colleagues worked out the structure of an important enzyme call XPD, a member of the helicase family of enzymes, found in all living organisms. The results were published in the May 2008 edition of the journal Cell. In eukaryotes, XPD is responsible for unwinding double-stranded DNA

357

Science Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

February 25, 2010 February 25, 2010 seafloor_biofilms Image of pillow basalts from inside the Pisces Submersible. » Links Scientific Highlight Templeton Lab EMSL News Imaging at SSRL » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Researchers Discover an Unexpected Source of Energy for Deep-sea Microbial Communities summary written by Raven Hanna New rock formed by deep undersea volcanoes does not stay bare long. Microbes quickly move onto these basalts to form communities in the form of biofilms. As these biofilms grow and develop, they change the geology of their environment, forming mineral deposits. Since many of these communities are deep in the cold ocean waters, where sunlight does not reach, they must use alternative sources of energy. What these might be is unknown, but a common theory posits that the microbes may be obtaining

358

Science Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10 10 image Outside view of the T=4 subunit arrangement. » Links Scientific Highlight Johnson Lab » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Following the pH-dependent Conformational Changes of a Maturing Viral Capsid summary written by Raven Hanna The capsid that surrounds viruses is formed from subunit proteins that interact in specific ways to form a tight shell. The processes of coming together and forming interactions are multistep and complex and are fundamental events to acquire viral infectivity. The capsid maturation process of the Nudaurelia capensis omega virus includes pH-dependant conformational changes and auto-proteolysis. Like many human viruses such as HIV and herpes virus, NwV, an insect virus, requires these specific structural changes to become infectious.

359

Evaluation of nuclear facility decommissioning projects. Three Mile Island Unit 2 reactor coolant system and systems decontamination. Summary status report. Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document summarizes information relating to the decontamination and restoration of the Three Mile Island Unit 2 reactor coolant system and other plant systems. Data have been collected from activity reports, reactor containment entry records, and other sources and entered in a computerized data system which permits extraction/manipulation of specific data which can be used in planning for recovery from a loss of coolant event similar to that experienced by the Three Mile Island Unit 2 on March 28, 1979. This report contains a summary of radiation exposures, manpower, and time spent in radiation areas during the referenced period. Support activities conducted outside of radiation areas are not included. Computer reports included are: A chronological listing of all activities related to decomtamination and restoration of the reactor coolant system and other plant systems for the period of April 5, 1979, through December 19, 1984; a summary of labor and exposures by department for the same time period; and summary reports for each major task undertaken in connection with this specific work scope during the referenced time period.

Doerge, D.H.; Miller, R.L.; Scotti, K.S.

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

Comparing the risk profiles of renewable and natural gas electricity contracts: A summary of the California Department of Water Resources contracts  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of natural gas prices, renewable resources in general have aSince the use of renewable resources decreases fuel priceof its electricity from renewable resources under long-term

Bachrach, Devra; Wiser, Ryan; Bolinger, Mark; Golove, William

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Nuclear Energy Production  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

We shall limit ourselves here to a very rough summary of the most important features of nuclear reactions in stars. This will suffice completely ... , while the study of particular aspects of nuclear astrophysics...

Professor Dr. Rudolf Kippenhahn

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

Summary Report on Stakeholder Workshop  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: Devon Manz Electric Power and Propulsion Systems Lab One Research Circle, Niskayuna, NY, 12309 PhoneSummary Report on Stakeholder Workshop Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity on Stakeholder Workshop By GE Global Research Niskayuna, New York And University of Hawaii Hawaii Natural Energy

363

Part II: Project Summaries Project Summaries  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Part II: Project Summaries Part II Project Summaries #12 generally cannot be achieved for reasonable computational cost. Applications that require modeling, and in nondestructive testing. The objective of this project is to advance the state of the art in electromagnetic

Perkins, Richard A.

364

Student FTE Summary Student FTE Summary  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Student FTE Summary Fall 2010 #12;1 Student FTE Summary Fall Term 2010 Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Percentage of Student FTE by College. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Student FTE by Student Level

365

Department of Energy Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs draft environmental impact statement. Summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document analyzes at a programmatic level the potential environmental consequences over the next 40 years of alternatives related to the transportation, receipt, processing, and storage of spent nuclear fuel under the responsibility of the US Department of Energy. It also analyzes the site-specific consequences of the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory sitewide actions anticipated over the next 10 years for waste and spent nuclear fuel management and environmental restoration. For programmatic spent nuclear fuel management, this document analyzes alternatives of no action, decentralization, regionalization, centralization and the use of the plans that existed in 1992/1993 for the management of these materials. For the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, this document analyzes alternatives of no action, ten-year plan, minimum and maximum treatment, storage, and disposal of US Department of Energy wastes.

Not Available

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

June 5, 2013 June 5, 2013 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period May 16, through May 30, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC - Shannon Brennan, DOE-ID, (208) 526-3993. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) [No items to Report] Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP) May 15 - 30, 2013: CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC discovered three instances of new information at the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) which have the potential to impact the nuclear safety analysis

367

DOE-ID Operations Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

January 6, 2014 January 6, 2014 DOE-ID Operations Summary For the Period November 01, 2013 through November 30, 2013 EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a summary of contractor operations at the Idaho National Laboratory, managed by DOE- Idaho Operations Office. It has been compiled in response to a request from stakeholders for more information on health, safety and environmental incidents at DOE facilities in Idaho. It also includes a brief summary of accomplishments at the Site. POC -Danielle Miller, (208) 526-5709. Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) Nothing to Report Notable Accomplishments: Contracting companies supporting EM's cleanup program and the Office of Nuclear Energy at the Idaho site volunteered to be among the first to use a new DOE

368

Webinar Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Webinar Summary Page 1 TC&WM EIS Webinar December 10, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD WEBINAR: FINAL TANK CLOSURE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT...

369

State Summaries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

46. 46. Percent Distribution of Natural Gas Supply and Disposition by State, 1996 Table State Estimated Proved Reserves (dry) Marketed Production Total Consumption Alabama................................................................... 3.02 2.69 1.48 Alaska ...................................................................... 5.58 2.43 2.04 Arizona..................................................................... NA 0 0.55 Arkansas.................................................................. 0.88 1.12 1.23 California.................................................................. 1.25 1.45 8.23 Colorado .................................................................. 4.63 2.90 1.40 Connecticut.............................................................. 0 0 0.58 D.C...........................................................................

370

Safeguards Summary Event List (SSEL), January 1, 1990--December 31, 1996, Vol. 2, Rev. 5  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Safeguards Summary Event List (SSEL), Vol. 2, Rev. 5, provides brief summaries of several hundred safeguards-related events involving nuclear material or facilities regulated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which occurred and were reported from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1996. Because of public interest, the Miscellaneous category includes a few events which involve either source material, byproduct material, or natural uranium which are exempt from safeguards requirements. Events are described under the categories of Bomb-related, Intrusion, Missing and/or Allegedly Stolen, Transportation-related, Tampering/Vandalism, Arson, Firearms, Radiological Sabotage, Nonradiological Sabotage, and Miscellaneous. The information contained in the event descriptions is derived primarily from official NRC reporting channels.

NONE

1997-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

Safeguards summary event list (SSEL), January 1, 1990--December 31, 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Safeguards Summary Event List (SSEL), Vol. 2, Rev. 4, provides brief summaries of several hundred safeguards-related events involving nuclear material or facilities regulated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which occurred and were reported from January 1, 1990, rough December 31, 1995. Because of public interest, the Miscellaneous category includes a few events which involve either source material, byproduct material, or natural uranium which are exempt from safeguards requirements. Events are described under the categories of Bomb-related, Intrusion, Missing and/or Allegedly Stolen, Transportation-related, Tampering/Vandalism, Arson, Firearms, Radiological Sabotage, Nonradiological Sabotage, and Miscellaneous. The information contained in the event descriptions is derived primarily from official NRC reporting channels.

NONE

1996-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

Second AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

TEAM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION and NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAMS SUBJECT: Second AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary (presented September 26, 2013) Attendees: Robert...

373

Equipment Summaries  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cooling Systems Cooling Systems Notes 1) This table focuses on primary cooling strategies. Many houses' cooling systems are supplemented by natural ventilation and other "passive" cooling strategies. 2005 Solar Decathlon # Team Outdoor unit Indoor unit System Description Size "Coolth" delivery method 1 Cal Poly Carrier 38YDB Carrier FH4BNF001 2-speed split system HP 2 ton Ducted forced air 2 Crowder 3 Colorado Mitsubishi MXZ30TN Two (2) Mitsubishi "Hi-Wall" Mini-split HP w/ 2 indoor units 1.5 ton (total) Ductless forced air 4 Canada "Hot tank" Airtechni Water-to-Water HP w/ fancoil Water-to-water heat pump (backup cooling of heat sink unclear) Ducted forced air 5 Cornell Trane XL19i Trane 4TEE3F31A Split-system HP w/ RotorSource desiccant wheel 2.5 ton Ducted forced air

374

The Nuclear Revolution, Relative Gains, and International Nuclear Assistance  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

nature of the nuclear recipients security environment. ThisKeywords: Nuclear weapons proliferation; security; securitynature of the nuclear recipients security environment. This

Kroenig, Matthew

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

STEP Financial Incentives Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

STEP Financial Incentives Summary, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

376

Geochemistry of organic-rich black shales overlying the natural nuclear fission reactors of Oklo, Republic of Gabon  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The organic-rich black shales of the Franceville Series` FB Formation overlying the uranium ores, and natural nuclear fission reactors of Oklo, Gabon, are not notably metalliferous. Chromium, gold, silver, and barium are slightly enriched in average Oklo black shale (AOK) relative to black shale standard SDO-1. Geochemical variations among the black shale samples of the sedimentary sequence include enrichment in potassium, barium, chromium, and silver in the four lowermost samples, the presence of a bleached zone depleted in organic carbon lowermost in the sequence, and elevated rare earth element (REE) content in samples closest to the Oklo reactor zones. Hydrothermal activity has influenced the geochemistry of the black shale but is evidently not linked to reactor-driven processes. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of Oklo black shale samples show slight enrichment in light REE and slight depletion in heavy REE, especially in the sample closest to the reactor zone. However, comparison of REE content with various petrographic facies in and near the Oklo reactors shows no apparent enrichment in fission product (intermediate) REE. With few exceptions, reactor facies all contain more REE than AOK. The chondrite-normalized REE pattern of AOK resembles that of greywacke-shale turbidites of Archean greenstone belts. The paucity of uranium and manganese in AOK is a curious anomaly in an area of world class uranium and manganese deposits.

Mossman, D.J. [Mount Allison Univ., Sackville, New Brunswick (Canada). Dept. of Physics, Engineering and Geoscience; Gauthier-Lafaye, F. [Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg (France). Centre de Geochimie de la Surface; Nagy, B.; Rigali, M.J. [Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (United States)

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

Record of Cycling Operation of the Natural Nuclear Reactor in the Oklo/Okelobondo Area in Gabon  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of variability of the long-term fundamental physical constants [5,6] to storage of nuclear wastes in geological on how to retain nuclear wastes, including fission Xe and Kr, and prevent uncontrolled runaway chain

378

Summary of Natural Resources that Potentially Influence Human Intrusion at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 1993, Raytheon Services Nevada completed a review of natural resource literature and other sources to identify potentially exploitable resources and potential future land uses near the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site (RWMS) of the Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nye County, Nevada, that could lead to future inadvertent human intrusion and subsequent release of radionuclides to the accessible environment. National Security Technologies, LLC, revised the original limited-distribution document to conform to current editorial standards and U.S. Department of Energy requirements for public release. The researchers examined the potential for future development of sand, gravel, mineral, petroleum, water resources, and rural land uses, such as agriculture, grazing, and hunting. The study was part of the performance assessment for Greater Confinement Disposal boreholes. Sand and gravel are not considered exploitable site resources because the materials are common throughout the area and the quality at the Area 5 RWMS is not ideal for typical commercial uses. Site information also indicates a very low mineral potential for the area. None of the 23 mining districts in southern Nye County report occurrences of economic mineral deposits in unconsolidated alluvium. The potential for oil and natural gas is low for southern Nye County. No occurrences of coal, tar sand, or oil shale on the NTS are reported in available literature. Several potential future uses of water were considered. Agricultural irrigation is impractical due to poor soils and existing water supply regulations. Use of water for geothermal energy development is unlikely because temperatures are too low for typical commercial applications using current technology. Human consumption of water has the most potential for cause of intrusion. The economics of future water needs may create a demand for the development of deep carbonate aquifers in the region. However, the Area 5 RWMS is not an optimal location for extraction of groundwater from the deep carbonate aquifer. Grazing and hunting are unlikely to be potential causes for inadvertent human intrusion into waste areas because of vegetation characteristics and lack of significant game animal populations.

NSTec Environmental Management

2007-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

March 10, 2011 meeting summary | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 10, 2011 meeting summary March 10, 2011 meeting summary March 10, 2011 meeting summary American Nuclear Insurers provided an overview of the private insurance program which provides third party liability financial protection for nuclear power plant operators and supporting entities. Insurance concepts were presented and contrasted against obligations stemming from international treaties. Underwriting considerations employed in the evaluation of insurance risk were explained. ANI provided further background on its comments submitted in response to the Notice of Inquiry on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation contingent cost allocation, dated November 9, 2010 and responded to Department staff questions. March 10, 2011 meeting summary More Documents & Publications Appendix C

380

March 10, 2011 meeting summary | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 10, 2011 meeting summary March 10, 2011 meeting summary March 10, 2011 meeting summary American Nuclear Insurers provided an overview of the private insurance program which provides third party liability financial protection for nuclear power plant operators and supporting entities. Insurance concepts were presented and contrasted against obligations stemming from international treaties. Underwriting considerations employed in the evaluation of insurance risk were explained. ANI provided further background on its comments submitted in response to the Notice of Inquiry on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation contingent cost allocation, dated November 9, 2010 and responded to Department staff questions. March 10, 2011 meeting summary More Documents & Publications Appendix C

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Natural Gas Weekly Update  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

. Home | Petroleum | Gasoline | Diesel | Propane | Natural Gas | Electricity | Coal | Nuclear Renewables | Alternative Fuels | Prices | States | International | Country Analysis...

382

Natural Gas: More Gasbuggies  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... first US experiment in the use of underground nuclear explosions to increase the recovery of natural ...naturalgas ...

1969-04-12T23:59:59.000Z

383

Evaluation of nuclear facility decommissioning projects. Three Mile Island Unit 2. Radioactive waste and laundry shipments. Volume 9. Summary status report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document summarizes information concerning radioactive waste and laundry shipments from the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to radioactive waste disposal sites and to protective clothing decontamination facilities (laundries) since the loss of coolant accident experienced on March 28, 1979. Data were collected from radioactive shipment records, summarized, and placed in a computerized data information retrieval/manipulation system which permits extraction of specific information. This report covers the period of April 9, 1979 to May 5, 1985. Included in this report are: waste disposal site locations, dose rates, curie content, waste description, container type and number, volumes and weights. This information is presented in two major categories: protective clothing (laundry) and radioactive waste. Each of the waste shipment reports is in chronological order.

Doerge, D. H.; Miller, R. L.; Scotti, K. S.

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Nuclear Ukraine  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... SIR - Your article (Nature 365, 599; 1993) on the US-Ukraine stalemate over nuclear weapons prompts the following remarks. The United States made a mistake ... nuclear weapons prompts the following remarks. The United States made a mistake in not recognizing Ukraine as a legitimate successor state to the Soviet nuclear arsenal and is still insisting that ...

Arno Arrak

1994-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

385

Status and development of magnetic mirror systems for nuclear testing applications  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Several system studies have concluded that the small size and steady-state nature of magnetic mirror systems provide attractive features of nuclear testing applications such as blanket testing, fissile fuel production, tritium production, or decontamination of high-level radioactive nuclear reactor wastes. A summary of the data base is presented, and next-generation experiments that could be carried out to explore plasma physics issues associated with the production of high neutron fluxes in magnetic mirror configurations are described.

Simonen, T.C.; Futch, A.H.; Kaiser, T.B.

1988-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

386

Part II: Project Summaries Project Summaries  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Part II: Project Summaries Part II Project Summaries #12;22 Math & Computational Sciences Division generally cannot be achieved for reasonable computational cost. Applications that require modeling of this project is to advance the state of the art in electromagnetic computations by eliminating three existing

Perkins, Richard A.

387

FY 2011 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2011 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2011 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing &

388

FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PER Summary | National PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, ...

389

FY 2010 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2010 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2010 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing &

390

FY 2007 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2007 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2007 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing &

391

SRS CAB - Meeting Summaries  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 Full Board Meetings January 23-24, 2012 Agenda Presentations Perceptions & Perspectives of ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Facilities Disposition & Site Remediation Committee Report Update on H Canyon Annual Integrator Operable Unit (IOU) Program Update Nuclear Materials Committee Natural Resources Management Plan for the Savannah River Site, May 2005 Saltstone Enhancements System Plan Revision 17 Inputs and Assumptions Thank you for your service on the Board 2012 CAB Topics for Consideration Waste Management Committee FY 2012 Environmental Management Program Funding Meeting Minutes March 26-27, 2012 Agenda Presentations Enterprise SRS Solving Global Challenges NNSA SRS Overview Environmental Management Program Funding Lower Three Runs Integrator Operable Unit (IOU) Early Action Update

392

Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering Cooperative Major in Nuclear Energy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering Cooperative Major in Nuclear Energy Master in Nuclear Energy Summary of Research Instruction Research Instruction Application Code Name Major in Nuclear Energy Master's Program Doctoral Program Summary of Research Instruction

Kaji, Hajime

393

BETTER BUILDINGS PARTNER SUMMARIES  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

In addition to Better Buildings Neighborhood Program Summary of Reported Data From July 1, 2010 September 30, 2013, each document below presents a summary of data reported by an organization...

394

Summaries of PIE Reports  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In the following section, summary reports of the Process Improvement Experiments are presented that have been assigned to the Problem Domain Software Quality, Testing, Validation and Verification. These summaries...

Michael Haug; Eric W. Olsen; Luisa Consolini

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

395

Las Vegas Roundtable Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Summary report from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtable held on March 16, 2011, in Las Vegas, Nevada.

396

Summary of Advice to the  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Summary of Advice to the Energy Information Administration from the American Statistical Association Committee on Energy Statistics at the Spring Meeting March 21-22, 2002 1. Weekly Natural Gas Storage Survey (Priority 1) Presenter: Elizabeth Campbell The Energy Information Administration (EIA) began its first collection of weekly natural gas data in May 2002 with implementation of the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Survey. EIA was directed to begin the new survey after the American Gas Association (AGA) announced its intent to stop operation of its voluntary weekly gas storage survey. The AGA survey has provided the only weekly volumetric data about the U.S. natural gas industry. EIA designed its survey to continue the basic data series which AGA has produced since the end of 1993 but will be making some changes to

397

Summary of Fire Protection Programs for CY-2003  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF NUCLEAR AND FACILITY SAFETY POLICY (EH-2.1) September 2004 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD................................................................................................................................... iii GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................... iv DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................1 DOE PROPERTY LOSS EXPERIENCE..........................................................................................1

398

Grout Isolation and Stabilization of Structures and Materials within Nuclear Facilities at the U.S. Department of Energy, Hanford Site, Summary - 12309  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Per regulatory agreement and facility closure design, U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site nuclear fuel cycle structures and materials require in situ isolation in perpetuity and/or interim physicochemical stabilization as a part of final disposal or interim waste removal, respectively. To this end, grout materials are being used to encase facilities structures or are being incorporated within structures containing hazardous and radioactive contaminants. Facilities where grout materials have been recently used for isolation and stabilization include: (1) spent fuel separations, (2) uranium trioxide calcining, (3) reactor fuel storage basin, (4) reactor fuel cooling basin transport rail tanker cars and casks, (5) cold vacuum drying and reactor fuel load-out, and (6) plutonium fuel metal finishing. Grout components primarily include: (1) portland cement, (2) fly ash, (3) aggregate, and (4) chemical admixtures. Mix designs for these typically include aggregate and non aggregate slurries and bulk powders. Placement equipment includes: (1) concrete piston line pump or boom pump truck for grout slurry, (2) progressive cavity and shearing vortex pump systems, and (3) extendable boom fork lift for bulk powder dry grout mix. Grout slurries placed within the interior of facilities were typically conveyed utilizing large diameter slick line and the equivalent diameter flexible high pressure concrete conveyance hose. Other facilities requirements dictated use of much smaller diameter flexible grout conveyance hose. Placement required direct operator location within facilities structures in most cases, whereas due to radiological dose concerns, placement has also been completed remotely with significant standoff distances. Grout performance during placement and subsequent to placement often required unique design. For example, grout placed in fuel basin structures to serve as interim stabilization materials required sufficient bearing i.e., unconfined compressive strength, to sustain heavy equipment yet, low breakout force to permit efficient removal by track hoe bucket or equivalent construction equipment. Further, flow of slurries through small orifice geometries of moderate head pressures was another typical design requirement. Phase separation of less than 1 percent was a typical design requirement for slurries. On the order of 30,000 cubic meters of cementitious grout have recently been placed in the above noted U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site facilities or structures. Each has presented a unique challenge in mix design, equipment, grout injection or placement, and ultimate facility or structure performance. Unconfined compressive and shear strength, flow, density, mass attenuation coefficient, phase separation, air content, wash-out, parameters and others, unique to each facility or structure, dictate the grout mix design for each. Each mix design was tested under laboratory and scaled field conditions as a precursor to field deployment. Further, after injection or placement of each grout formulation, the material was field inspected either by standard laboratory testing protocols, direct physical evaluation, or both. (authors)

Phillips, S.J.; Phillips, M.; Etheridge, D. [Applied Geotechnical Engineering and Construction, Incorporated, Richland, Washington (United States); Chojnacki, D.W.; Herzog, C.B.; Matosich, B.J.; Steffen, J.M.; Sterling, R.T. [CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company, Richland, Washington (United States); Flaucher, R.H.; Lloyd, E.R. [Fluor Federal Services, Incorporated, Richland, Washington (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

Natural Gas Vented and Flared (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

143,457 166,909 165,360 165,928 209,439 212,848 1936-2012 143,457 166,909 165,360 165,928 209,439 212,848 1936-2012 Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico 12,509 14,507 14,754 13,971 15,502 16,296 1997-2012 Alabama 2,372 1,801 2,495 2,617 3,491 NA 1967-2012 Alaska 6,458 10,023 6,481 10,173 10,966 11,769 1967-2012 Arizona 0 0 0 0 0 0 1971-2012 Arkansas 11 114 141 425 494 NA 1967-2012 California 1,879 2,127 2,501 2,790 2,424 NA 1967-2012 Colorado 1,333 1,501 1,411 1,242 1,291 NA 1967-2012 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1971-2012 Illinois 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2012 Indiana 0 0 0 0 2003-2010 Kansas 363 373 353 323 307 NA 1967-2012 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2012 Louisiana 6,496 4,021 4,336 4,578 6,302 NA 1967-2012 Maryland 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2012 Michigan 3,324 3,324 3,324 3,324 3,324 NA 1967-2012

400

Natural Gas Vented and Flared (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6-2013 6-2013 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Arizona NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Arkansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 California NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Colorado NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Florida NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Illinois NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Indiana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Kansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Kentucky NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Louisiana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Maryland NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Michigan NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Mississippi NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Missouri NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Montana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Nebraska NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Nevada NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 New Mexico NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Vehicle Fuel Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,700 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,790 2,700 1997-2013 ,700 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,790 2,700 1997-2013 Alabama 10 10 10 10 18 17 2010-2013 Alaska 2 2 2 2 1 1 2010-2013 Arizona 190 196 190 196 159 154 2010-2013 Arkansas 2 2 2 2 2 2 2010-2013 California 1,278 1,321 1,278 1,321 1,365 1,321 2010-2013 Colorado 23 24 23 24 26 25 2010-2013 Connecticut 4 4 4 4 3 2 2010-2013 Delaware 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2013 District of Columbia 83 86 83 86 82 79 2010-2013 Florida 6 6 6 6 8 8 2010-2013 Georgia 86 89 86 89 102 99 2010-2013 Hawaii 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2013 Idaho 7 7 7 7 12 12 2010-2013 Illinois 28 29 28 29 24 24 2010-2013 Indiana 5 5 5 5 2 2 2010-2013 Iowa 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2013 Kansas 1 1 1 1 1 1 2010-2013 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2013 Louisiana

402

Industrial Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

603,966 598,721 565,544 584,812 593,722 576,117 2001-2013 603,966 598,721 565,544 584,812 593,722 576,117 2001-2013 Alabama 14,221 15,643 14,328 14,507 14,677 14,100 2001-2013 Alaska 317 306 262 297 370 311 2001-2013 Arizona 1,686 1,618 1,325 1,435 1,417 1,484 2001-2013 Arkansas 7,142 6,391 6,312 6,522 6,477 6,611 2001-2013 California 54,454 59,859 59,316 64,841 67,915 63,806 2001-2013 Colorado 6,957 5,661 NA 4,670 4,741 4,545 2001-2013 Connecticut NA 2,197 1,933 2,070 2,010 1,968 2001-2013 Delaware NA 2,742 2,578 2,519 2,463 NA 2001-2013 District of Columbia 0 0 0 0 0 0 2001-2013 Florida 8,594 8,789 7,617 7,686 8,131 7,363 2001-2013 Georgia 13,838 13,643 12,459 12,847 13,036 12,934 2001-2013 Hawaii 42 37 33 30 NA 31 2001-2013 Idaho 2,294 2,296 2,177 1,930 1,846 2,229 2001-2013

403

Residential Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4,722,358 4,892,277 4,778,907 4,782,412 4,713,777 4,148,970 4,722,358 4,892,277 4,778,907 4,782,412 4,713,777 4,148,970 1930-2012 Alabama 35,481 37,793 36,061 42,215 36,582 27,582 1967-2012 Alaska 19,843 21,439 19,978 18,714 20,262 21,380 1967-2012 Arizona 38,321 38,453 34,732 37,812 38,592 34,974 1967-2012 Arkansas 32,731 35,718 33,252 36,240 33,737 26,191 1967-2012 California 492,378 489,304 480,721 494,890 512,565 477,931 1967-2012 Colorado 130,971 133,947 128,993 131,224 130,116 115,306 1967-2012 Connecticut 43,348 42,935 43,995 42,729 44,719 41,050 1967-2012 Delaware 10,000 9,875 10,049 10,126 10,030 8,564 1967-2012 District of Columbia 13,371 13,222 13,466 13,608 12,386 11,260 1980-2012 Florida 15,066 15,594 15,214 18,744 16,400 14,395 1967-2012 Georgia

404

Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,573,899 1,566,484 1,742,250 1,740,590 1,589,767 1,685,701 1,573,899 1,566,484 1,742,250 1,740,590 1,589,767 1,685,701 2001-2013 Alabama 40,093 45,888 47,114 50,149 42,915 45,014 2001-2013 Alaska 5,305 4,083 3,897 4,126 4,550 5,440 2001-2013 Arizona 15,280 28,315 36,692 37,008 29,941 21,017 2001-2013 Arkansas 16,456 19,845 20,078 19,742 17,323 17,438 2001-2013 California NA 165,343 186,282 190,833 184,051 179,561 2001-2013 Colorado 21,660 NA 19,108 18,682 18,366 24,650 2001-2013 Connecticut 15,333 13,555 16,365 14,945 14,656 NA 2001-2013 Delaware NA 6,793 8,060 7,185 NA 7,087 2001-2013 District of Columbia 1,332 NA 1,103 1,065 1,126 NA 2001-2013 Florida 100,467 108,852 109,429 120,138 NA 106,907 2001-2013 Georgia 43,035 45,150 44,419 47,759 45,701 48,772 2001-2013

405

District of Columbia Natural Gas Summary  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View History Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Pipeline and Distribution Use 1982-2005 Citygate -- -- -- -- -- -- 1989-2012 Residential 15.67 16.49 13.92 13.53 13.06 12.10 1980-2012 Commercial 13.69 13.90 12.99 12.26 12.24 11.19 1980-2012 Industrial -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2012 Vehicle Fuel 9.49 15.57 6.83 4.87 4.17 9.38 1995-2012 Electric Power -- -- -- -- 4.96 -- 2001-2012 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 32,966 31,880 33,177 33,251 32,862 28,572 1997-2012 Pipeline & Distribution Use 238 203 177 213 1,703 1,068 1997-2012 Delivered to Consumers 32,728 31,678 33,000 33,038 31,159 27,504 1997-2012 Residential 13,371 13,222 13,466 13,608 12,386 11,260 1980-2012

406

Vehicle Fuel Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,700 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,790 2,700 1997-2013 ,700 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,790 2,700 1997-2013 Alabama 10 10 10 10 18 17 2010-2013 Alaska 2 2 2 2 1 1 2010-2013 Arizona 190 196 190 196 159 154 2010-2013 Arkansas 2 2 2 2 2 2 2010-2013 California 1,278 1,321 1,278 1,321 1,365 1,321 2010-2013 Colorado 23 24 23 24 26 25 2010-2013 Connecticut 4 4 4 4 3 2 2010-2013 Delaware 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2013 District of Columbia 83 86 83 86 82 79 2010-2013 Florida 6 6 6 6 8 8 2010-2013 Georgia 86 89 86 89 102 99 2010-2013 Hawaii 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2013 Idaho 7 7 7 7 12 12 2010-2013 Illinois 28 29 28 29 24 24 2010-2013 Indiana 5 5 5 5 2 2 2010-2013 Iowa 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2013 Kansas 1 1 1 1 1 1 2010-2013 Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2013 Louisiana

407

Dry Natural Gas Estimated Production (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8,545 19,466 20,523 21,594 22,239 23,555 1977-2011 8,545 19,466 20,523 21,594 22,239 23,555 1977-2011 Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico 2,738 NA 1992-2007 Alabama 287 274 257 254 223 218 1977-2011 Alaska 408 388 354 358 317 327 1977-2011 Arkansas 188 269 456 698 951 1,079 1977-2011 California 255 253 237 239 243 311 1977-2011 Colorado 1,174 1,326 1,441 1,524 1,590 1,694 1977-2011 Florida 2 4 3 0 15 0 1977-2011 Kansas 350 361 357 334 305 285 1977-2011 Kentucky 66 80 93 108 96 101 1977-2011 Louisiana 1,309 1,257 1,319 1,544 2,189 2,985 1981-2011 Michigan 197 184 157 153 154 139 1977-2011 Mississippi 83 100 110 100 87 75 1977-2011 Montana 117 112 114 113 93 75 1977-2011 New Mexico 1,426 1,349 1,349 1,350 1,220 1,170 1977-2011 New York

408

Natural Gas Used for Repressuring (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

NA NA NA NA NA NA 1973-2013 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1973-2013 Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico NA NA NA NA NA NA 1997-2013 Alabama NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Arizona NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Arkansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 California NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Colorado NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Florida NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Illinois NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Indiana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Kansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Kentucky NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Louisiana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Maryland NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Michigan NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Mississippi NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Missouri NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013

409

Lease Fuel Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

861,063 864,113 913,229 916,797 938,340 987,957 1983-2012 861,063 864,113 913,229 916,797 938,340 987,957 1983-2012 Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico 115,528 102,389 103,976 108,490 101,217 93,985 1999-2012 Alabama 11,345 11,136 10,460 10,163 10,367 12,389 1983-2012 Alaska 227,374 211,878 219,161 211,918 208,531 214,335 1983-2012 Arizona 20 20 17 19 17 12 1983-2012 Arkansas 1,502 2,521 4,091 5,340 6,173 6,599 1983-2012 California 56,936 64,689 63,127 64,931 44,379 51,154 1983-2012 Colorado 39,347 44,231 64,873 66,083 78,800 76,462 1983-2012 Florida 654 897 94 4,512 4,896 6,080 1983-2012 Illinois 39 41 62 50 101 122 1983-2012 Indiana 101 161 211 283 433 506 1983-2012 Kansas 10,232 12,803 15,169 13,461 12,781 17,017 1983-2012 Kentucky 2,676 3,914 4,862 5,626 5,925 6,095 1983-2012

410

Industrial Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

596,680 565,544 584,812 593,722 576,367 615,382 2001-2013 596,680 565,544 584,812 593,722 576,367 615,382 2001-2013 Alabama 15,643 14,328 14,507 14,677 14,100 15,240 2001-2013 Alaska 306 262 297 370 311 392 2001-2013 Arizona 1,618 1,325 1,435 1,417 1,484 1,746 2001-2013 Arkansas 6,391 6,312 6,522 6,477 6,611 7,334 2001-2013 California 59,859 59,316 64,841 67,915 63,806 60,529 2001-2013 Colorado 5,661 NA 4,670 4,741 4,545 6,570 2001-2013 Connecticut 2,197 1,933 2,070 2,010 1,968 NA 2001-2013 Delaware 2,742 2,578 2,519 2,463 NA 2,554 2001-2013 District of Columbia 0 0 0 0 0 0 2001-2013 Florida 8,789 7,617 7,686 8,131 7,363 8,390 2001-2013 Georgia 13,643 12,459 12,847 13,036 12,934 14,597 2001-2013 Hawaii 37 33 30 NA 31 30 2001-2013 Idaho 2,296 2,177 1,930 1,846 2,229 2,372 2001-2013

411

Electric Power Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

613,004 733,992 905,868 898,441 749,379 636,285 2001-2013 613,004 733,992 905,868 898,441 749,379 636,285 2001-2013 Alabama 21,814 29,325 30,779 33,496 26,773 26,791 2001-2013 Alaska 2,660 2,667 2,549 2,509 2,322 2,440 2001-2013 Arizona 9,608 23,656 32,223 32,612 25,355 15,157 2001-2013 Arkansas 5,777 10,363 10,497 10,091 7,482 6,116 2001-2013 California 56,457 66,002 82,047 82,511 82,139 69,457 2001-2013 Colorado 6,136 8,848 10,258 9,801 8,839 5,479 2001-2013 Connecticut 9,363 8,491 11,393 9,827 9,182 8,042 2001-2013 Delaware 3,353 3,645 5,026 4,157 3,895 3,483 2001-2013 District of Columbia -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2013 Florida 86,344 96,637 96,912 107,377 95,708 93,341 2001-2013 Georgia 21,096 26,054 24,911 28,011 26,038 24,806 2001-2013 Hawaii -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2013

412

Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

541,055 2,443,946 2,550,349 2,546,415 2,466,292 2,574,401 541,055 2,443,946 2,550,349 2,546,415 2,466,292 2,574,401 1973-2013 Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico 114,382 103,384 110,472 103,769 106,596 102,840 1997-2013 Alabama NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Alaska 261,026 234,298 241,910 231,276 247,528 261,351 1991-2013 Arizona NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Arkansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 California NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Colorado NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Florida NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Illinois NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Indiana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Kansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Kentucky NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Louisiana 207,497 197,842 207,415 197,786 182,508 181,677 1991-2013 Maryland NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013

413

Electric Power Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,841,408 6,668,379 6,872,533 7,387,184 7,573,863 9,110,793 6,841,408 6,668,379 6,872,533 7,387,184 7,573,863 9,110,793 1997-2012 Alabama 175,736 164,266 227,015 281,722 342,841 401,306 1997-2012 Alaska 40,901 43,199 38,078 39,732 41,738 39,758 1997-2012 Arizona 280,156 283,817 261,904 224,430 180,966 228,818 1997-2012 Arkansas 63,594 64,188 83,266 96,553 107,014 129,059 1997-2012 California 834,286 857,867 808,928 736,092 616,564 855,342 1997-2012 Colorado 123,788 106,454 115,234 92,657 85,015 86,309 1997-2012 Connecticut 73,627 59,354 70,864 85,144 107,897 114,054 1997-2012 Delaware 13,493 11,181 10,990 24,383 38,984 53,295 1997-2012 District of Columbia -- -- -- -- 1,003 W 1997-2012 Florida 772,968 797,266 913,672 981,750 1,043,786 1,138,771 1997-2012 Georgia

414

Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

21,256,042 21,409,349 20,964,665 22,127,046 22,467,053 23,409,012 21,256,042 21,409,349 20,964,665 22,127,046 22,467,053 23,409,012 1997-2012 Alabama 385,209 369,750 418,677 496,051 558,116 622,384 1997-2012 Alaska 99,281 87,677 81,335 80,794 88,178 87,404 1997-2012 Arizona 372,536 376,961 348,877 315,448 275,627 319,695 1997-2012 Arkansas 214,298 221,983 230,488 256,102 266,194 278,106 1997-2012 California 2,327,205 2,330,514 2,256,380 2,196,086 2,096,279 2,336,907 1997-2012 Colorado 435,360 426,034 420,500 396,083 345,663 326,721 1997-2012 Connecticut 175,820 162,576 179,225 192,687 223,734 224,412 1997-2012 Delaware 48,139 48,144 50,126 54,685 79,251 100,630 1997-2012 District of Columbia 32,728 31,678 33,000 33,038 31,159 27,504 1997-2012 Florida 905,828 932,172 1,044,872 1,131,142 1,199,247 1,306,029 1997-2012

415

Natural Gas In Underground Storage (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Monthly Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 View History U.S. 6,652,218 7,026,645 7,302,127 7,572,885 7,928,016 8,180,478 1973-2013 Alabama 28,958 28,160 28,582 28,018 29,312 28,384 1995-2013 Alaska 29,473 30,384 31,284 32,766 34,652 36,346 2013-2013 Arkansas 11,575 11,977 12,383 12,816 13,020 13,069 1990-2013 California 526,990 548,682 551,855 553,972 563,219 571,415 1990-2013 Colorado 74,046 80,390 87,199 94,797 100,693 103,316 1990-2013 Illinois 774,182 809,958 842,081 876,844 917,781 952,936 1990-2013 Indiana 89,244 91,822 94,240 97,911 101,106 102,341 1990-2013

416

Natural Gas In Underground Storage (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Monthly Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View History U.S. 6,235,025 6,652,218 7,026,645 7,302,127 7,572,885 7,928,016 1973-2013 Alabama 28,455 28,958 28,160 28,582 28,018 29,312 1995-2013 Alaska 28,203 29,473 30,384 31,284 32,766 34,652 2013-2013 Arkansas 11,133 11,575 11,977 12,383 12,816 13,020 1990-2013 California 494,687 526,990 548,682 551,855 553,972 563,219 1990-2013 Colorado 70,182 74,046 80,390 87,199 94,797 100,693 1990-2013 Illinois 746,993 774,182 809,958 842,081 876,844 917,781 1990-2013 Indiana 87,254 89,244 91,822 94,240 97,911 101,106 1990-2013

417

Electric Power Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

563,306 614,637 735,693 906,613 899,337 749,910 2001-2013 563,306 614,637 735,693 906,613 899,337 749,910 2001-2013 Alabama 22,145 21,858 29,207 30,646 33,364 26,650 2001-2013 Alaska 3,075 2,783 2,821 2,544 3,068 2,326 2001-2013 Arizona 11,182 9,607 23,660 32,289 32,627 25,375 2001-2013 Arkansas 5,244 5,913 10,480 10,623 10,213 7,597 2001-2013 California 49,432 54,781 66,503 83,228 83,193 83,324 2001-2013 Colorado 6,213 6,120 8,902 10,615 10,089 8,938 2001-2013 Connecticut 8,518 9,607 8,698 11,622 10,062 9,318 2001-2013 Delaware 2,642 3,411 4,471 5,115 4,230 3,887 2001-2013 District of Columbia -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2013 Florida 79,903 86,424 96,667 97,039 107,430 95,668 2001-2013 Georgia 20,533 21,175 26,102 24,963 28,053 26,086 2001-2013 Hawaii -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2013

418

Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1-2013 1-2013 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Arizona NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Arkansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 California NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Colorado NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Florida NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Illinois NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Indiana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Kansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Kentucky NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Louisiana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Maryland NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Michigan NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Mississippi NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Missouri NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Montana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013 Nebraska NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 Nevada NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2013 New Mexico NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2013

419

Working Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,857,570 2,270,934 2,642,060 2,936,813 3,210,598 3,564,920 1,857,570 2,270,934 2,642,060 2,936,813 3,210,598 3,564,920 1973-2013 Alabama 20,405 20,908 20,110 20,532 19,968 21,262 1995-2013 Alaska 14,007 15,277 16,187 17,087 18,569 20,455 2013-2013 Arkansas 1,486 1,928 2,330 2,735 3,168 3,372 1990-2013 California 255,453 287,757 309,448 326,906 329,024 338,271 1990-2013 Colorado 15,625 19,489 25,833 32,642 40,240 46,136 1990-2013 Illinois 50,160 75,951 110,815 142,938 177,700 218,245 1990-2013 Indiana 8,965 10,955 13,533 15,951 19,622 22,817 1990-2013 Iowa 11,615 17,696 23,768 32,853 47,421 64,102 1990-2013 Kansas 35,397 49,412 62,747 79,590 91,430 101,169 1990-2013 Kentucky 52,985 61,078 68,847 74,285 79,656 88,369 1990-2013 Louisiana 212,975 235,835 263,701 296,375 315,517 342,981 1990-2013

420

Industrial Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6,654,716 6,670,182 6,167,371 6,826,192 6,994,120 7,223,835 6,654,716 6,670,182 6,167,371 6,826,192 6,994,120 7,223,835 1997-2012 Alabama 150,484 142,389 131,228 144,938 153,358 171,730 1997-2012 Alaska 19,751 5,987 6,635 6,408 6,769 6,357 1997-2012 Arizona 19,355 20,184 17,948 19,245 21,724 22,657 1997-2012 Arkansas 85,773 85,140 77,585 83,061 85,437 81,399 1997-2012 California 738,501 720,592 706,154 703,536 706,350 735,787 1997-2012 Colorado 117,230 119,706 113,582 114,295 74,407 73,028 1997-2012 Connecticut 22,794 22,539 24,585 24,117 26,258 26,935 1997-2012 Delaware 16,014 18,216 17,402 7,983 19,760 28,737 1997-2012 District of Columbia 0 0 0 0 0 0 1997-2012 Florida 66,453 68,275 65,500 76,522 85,444 98,144 1997-2012 Georgia 152,674 150,773 140,326 146,737 144,940 146,399 1997-2012

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Base Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Citygate Price Residential Price Commercial Price Industrial Price Electric Power Price Gross Withdrawals Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals From Oil Wells Gross Withdrawals From Shale Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals From Coalbed Wells Repressuring Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed Vented and Flared Marketed Production NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Dry Production Imports By Pipeline LNG Imports Exports Exports By Pipeline LNG Exports Underground Storage Capacity Gas in Underground Storage Base Gas in Underground Storage Working Gas in Underground Storage Underground Storage Injections Underground Storage Withdrawals Underground Storage Net Withdrawals Total Consumption Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption Pipeline & Distribution Use Delivered to Consumers Residential Commercial Industrial Vehicle Fuel Electric Power Period:

422

Plant Fuel Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

365,323 355,590 362,009 368,830 384,248 408,316 1983-2012 365,323 355,590 362,009 368,830 384,248 408,316 1983-2012 Alabama 6,269 6,858 6,470 6,441 6,939 6,616 1983-2012 Alaska 41,197 40,286 39,447 37,316 35,339 37,397 1983-2012 Arkansas 404 470 489 529 423 622 1983-2012 California 2,540 2,318 2,611 2,370 2,253 2,417 1983-2012 Colorado 16,218 18,613 21,288 25,090 28,265 29,383 1983-2012 Florida 671 83 0 0 0 0 1983-2012 Illinois 45 48 41 4,559 4,917 4,896 1983-2012 Kansas 5,439 2,331 2,126 2,102 2,246 2,268 1983-2012 Kentucky 691 587 391 772 278 641 1983-2012 Louisiana 51,499 42,957 39,002 40,814 42,633 42,123 1983-2012 Michigan 2,076 1,982 1,686 1,684 1,303 1,174 1983-2012 Mississippi 1,196 1,140 1,150 1,155 1,042 1,111 1983-2012 Montana 816 788 771 800 604 612 1983-2012

423

Residential Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

201,662 124,885 113,148 105,298 122,276 212,126 1973-2014 Alabama 1,362 814 774 758 725 1,138 1989-2014 Alaska 800 678 545 538 875 1,767 1989-2014 Arizona 1,720 1,253 1,077 1,007...

424

Commercial Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

74,196 139,823 135,727 135,963 146,941 202,518 1973-2014 Alabama 1,531 1,158 1,217 1,212 1,172 1,830 1989-2014 Alaska 904 830 NA 760 1,083 1,665 1989-2014 Arizona 2,242 1,915 1,828...

425

Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Summary)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Power Price Gross Withdrawals Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals From Oil Wells Gross Withdrawals From Shale Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals From Coalbed Wells...

426

Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Summary)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Additions LNG Storage Withdrawals LNG Storage Net Withdrawals Total Consumption Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption Lease Fuel Plant Fuel Pipeline & Distribution Use Delivered to...

427

Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Summary)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Gas Processed NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Dry Production Imports By Pipeline LNG Imports Exports Exports By Pipeline LNG Exports Underground Storage Capacity...

428

Residential Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

368,670 193,869 128,608 112,802 108,847 120,681 1973-2013 368,670 193,869 128,608 112,802 108,847 120,681 1973-2013 Alabama 2,208 1,330 984 718 771 783 1989-2013 Alaska 1,901 1,121 589 500 593 994 1989-2013 Arizona 2,272 1,674 1,226 1,052 1,031 1,132 1989-2013 Arkansas 2,516 1,424 758 633 634 577 1989-2013 California 31,397 26,182 22,863 20,883 21,203 19,688 1989-2013 Colorado 12,415 6,719 3,653 2,677 2,661 3,201 1989-2013 Connecticut 4,273 1,676 1,202 903 981 1,167 1989-2013 Delaware 711 NA 196 149 158 180 1989-2013 District of Columbia 743 438 NA 274 248 275 1989-2013 Florida NA 959 639 703 712 842 1989-2013 Georgia 7,299 5,281 3,680 3,607 3,640 3,650 1989-2013 Hawaii 49 50 50 47 47 47 1989-2013 Idaho 1,844 897 649 471 422 647 1989-2013 Illinois

429

Vehicle Fuel Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

24,655 25,982 27,262 28,664 29,974 30,056 1997-2012 24,655 25,982 27,262 28,664 29,974 30,056 1997-2012 Alabama 88 84 80 105 192 192 1988-2012 Alaska 28 26 22 20 11 11 1997-2012 Arizona 2,010 1,991 2,096 2,015 1,712 1,717 1988-2012 Arkansas 13 12 11 16 21 21 1988-2012 California 11,015 11,705 12,802 13,572 14,660 14,700 1988-2012 Colorado 141 121 250 249 282 283 1988-2012 Connecticut 89 81 49 41 27 27 1988-2012 Delaware 5 4 1 1 1 1 1988-2012 District of Columbia 61 45 830 883 879 881 1988-2012 Florida 243 137 116 60 84 84 1988-2012 Georgia 1,034 1,074 1,072 915 1,097 1,100 1988-2012 Hawaii 0 0 0 0 0 0 1997-2012 Idaho 79 60 65 69 131 132 1988-2012 Illinois 244 233 238 294 261 262 1988-2012 Indiana 128 123 77 50 17 17 1988-2012 Iowa

430

Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Summary)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Total Working Gas Capacity Total Number of Existing Fields Period: Monthly Annual Total Working Gas Capacity Total Number of Existing Fields Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 View History U.S. 9,072,508 9,104,181 9,111,242 9,117,296 9,132,250 9,171,017 1989-2013 Alaska 83,592 83,592 83,592 83,592 83,592 83,592 2013-2013 Lower 48 States 8,988,916 9,020,589 9,027,650 9,033,704 9,048,658 9,087,425 2012-2013 Alabama 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 2002-2013 Arkansas 21,853 21,853 21,853 21,853 21,853 21,853 2002-2013 California 592,711 592,711 592,711 599,711 599,711 599,711 2002-2013 Colorado 122,086 122,086 122,086 122,086 122,086 122,086 2002-2013

431

nuclear | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

nuclear nuclear Dataset Summary Description This dataset presents summary information related to world nuclear energy. It is part of a supporting dataset for the book World On the Edge: How to Prevent Environmental and Economic Collapse by Lester R. Source Earth Policy Institute Date Released January 12th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords EU nuclear nuclear electricity world Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon Summary nuclear energy consumption data (xls, 68.6 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period License License Open Data Commons Attribution License Comment "Reuse of our data is permitted. We merely ask that wherever it is listed, it be appropriately cited" Rate this dataset

432

A real options approach to investing in the first nuclear power plant under cost uncertainty: comparison with natural gas power plant for the Tunisian case  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper uses a real options approach to present a method for evaluating the first Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) investment in Tunisia in 2020. The evaluating model integrates the value of real options: option to wait in the standard discount cash flow analysis. According to the IAEA (2007), starting the first stage of a nuclear power programme makes it possible to construct the first NPP in second time. This study considers that the economic worth of the NPP investment depends on the production cost of the natural gas power plant. This study assumes that the profit realised by the NPP project, defined as the difference between natural gas and nuclear production costs, represented the cash flow of the NPP investment. However, the value of this cash flow is uncertain. This is an investment choice problem under uncertainty. The analysis proposes the optimal investment strategy in NPP project for the Tunisian government. Furthermore, the threshold value of investment cash flow defining the timing of starting NPP construction is calculated. [Received: July 10, 2008; Accepted: November 23, 2008

Mohamed Ben Abdelhamid; Chaker Aloui; Corinne Chaton

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

433

Summary Results of Challenges and Opportunities for Technology Areas of the Grid  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 2012 5, 2012 Summary Results of Challenges & Opportunities for Technology Areas of the Grid From Breakout Group Sessions DOE Grid Tech Team Vision of a 21 st Century Distribution System A seamless, cost-effective electricity system, from generation to end-use, capable of meeting all clean energy demands and capacity requirements, while allowing consumer participation and electricity use as desired: * Significant scale-up of clean energy (renewables, natural gas, nuclear, fossil with CCUS) * Allows 100% consumer participation and choice (including distributed generation, demand-side management, electrification of transportation, and energy efficiency) * 100% holistically designed (including regional diversity, AC-DC transmission and distribution solutions, microgrids, and centralized-

434

Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities The Advanced Instrumentation, Information, and Control (II&C) Systems Technologies pathway of the Light Water Reactor Sustainability(LWRS) Program conducts a vigorous engagement strategy with the U.S. nuclear power industry, including the nuclear operating companies, major support organizations, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and suppliers. The goal of this engagement strategy is to develop a shared vision and common understanding across the nuclear industry of the need for II&C modernization, the performance improvement that can be obtained, and the opportunities for collaboration to enact this vision. The primary means of engaging the nuclear operating companies is through a

435

Essential Services Meeting Summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This summary of proceedings report focuses on an end-of-grant meeting at which grantees for Project Area 5 were convened.

HCTT CHE

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

XRM2005 Conference Summary  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

some of the other organizers. (from the Conference web site)XRM 2005 Conference Summary Janos Kirz Advanced LightThe presentations at the Conference covered the latest

Kirz, Janos

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Final Meeting Summary ...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Health, Safety, and Environmental Protection Committee November 8, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD HEALTH SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMITTEE November...

438

Summary of Emergency Management Results from Pilot Evaluations | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of Emergency Management Results from Pilot Evaluations Summary of Emergency Management Results from Pilot Evaluations Summary of Emergency Management Results from Pilot Evaluations September 19th, 2012 Presenter: David Freshwater, Emergency Management Specialist, Office of Emergency Management, National Nuclear Security Administration Topics covered: Confirm that Critical Safety Function scenarios were addressed in HS/EPHA Determine whether site/facility had robust capabilities that allow flexible and effective emergency response to severe events Engage site/facility personnel regarding preferences for requirements/guidance changes where alternate courses of action existed Summary of Emergency Management Results from Pilot Evaluations More Documents & Publications Emergency Management Concepts, Existing Guidance, and Changes

439

Microsoft Word - Nuclear_Astrophysics_Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

were several conclusions reached during the session regarding the future direction of the ATLAS facility. The consensus of the astrophysics working group was that there is very...

440

Infrastructure Security Executive Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

expertise derived from our nuclear weapons heritage supports programs in solar and wind power for electricity generation, combustion science, nuclear repository design, and others....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Microsoft PowerPoint - Summary Presentation - 111205 DA.PPTX  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary of the August Summary of the August Workshop to Identify Potential Synergies between Nuclear and Renewable Energy Opportunities December 2011 Dana Christensen NREL Workshop Report at: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/52256.pdf 2 Summary Presentation Outline * Purpose and mission of the initiative * Workshop summary * Path forward 3 Initiative's Purpose / Mission The objective of the workshop was to assemble experts in nuclear energy and renewable energy to Identify and prioritize potential synergies between nuclear energy and renewable energy / energy efficiency Identify potential leveraging opportunities Why? Meeting the U.S.'s energy needs will be challenging especially if carbon emissions are constrained or domestic and / or non-traditional sources for transportation energy become more important. Synergies may lead

442

Studies on intrinsic summary evaluation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Summary evaluation has gained importance in the research community and seems to be a quite challenging task. Most of the work till date focus on summary generation, while this paper focus on intrinsic summary evaluation. Studies made for preparing the ... Keywords: effectiveness, extraction, inter judge agreement, intrinsic summary evaluation, precision, rank correlation, recall, summarisation, text summary, utility mechanisms

Shanmugasundaram Hariharan; Rengaramanujam Srinivasan

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

Summary of Fire Protection Programs for Calendar Year 2007  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SUMMARY of SUMMARY of FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAMS for CALENDAR YEAR 2007 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Corporate Safety Analysis Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Assistance February 2009 Fire Protection Summary for Calendar Year 2007 i ii i FOREWORD A key safety objective of the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) is to minimize the potential for and consequences of fires at DOE facilities. Since May 1950, an annual Fire Protection Program Summary (Annual Summary) has been developed by DOE and its predecessor agencies, the Atomic Energy Commission and the Energy Research Development Administration, to provide a means for measuring how well DOE is meeting this objective and where improvements can be made. In 1999, the Annual Summary reporting process was automated to streamline data collection and

444

EA-1290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium 290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium EA-1290: Disposition of Russian Federation Titled Natural Uranium SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to transport up to an average of 9,000 metric tons per year of natural uranium as uranium hexafluoride (UF6) from the United States to the Russian Federation. This amount of uranium is equivalent to 13,3000 metric tons of UF6. The EA also examines the impacts of this action on the global commons. Transfer of natural UF6 to the Russian Federation is part of a joint U.S./Russian program to dispose of highly enriched uranium (HEU) from dismantled Russian nuclear weapons. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

445

1.0EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ARC-TR-03-0002 ARC-TR-03-0002 Electrochemical Noise Sensors for Detection of Localized and General Corrosion of Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines Final Report for the Period July 2001 - October 2002 December 2002 Sophie J. Bullard, Bernard S. Covino, Jr., James H. Russell, Gordon R. Holcomb, Stephen D. Cramer, and Margaret Ziomek-Moroz Albany Research Center U.S. Department of Energy Albany, OR PREPARED FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY. Work Performed Under Work Package Number FE-01-06 This page left intentionally blank. 2 Electrochemical Noise Sensors for Detection of Localized and General Corrosion of Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

446

SUMMARY REPORT ANNUAL IABP MEETING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SUMMARY REPORT THE 7TH ANNUAL IABP MEETING St. Petersburg, Russia, 3 - 6 June 1997 #12;IABP-7 Summary Report 2 Table of Contents Summary Report-ordinator's Report.......................................................... 20 5. Report of the Data Buoy Co

Rigor, Ignatius G.

447

FTCP 2011 Operational Plan Closeout Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Operational Plan Closeout Summary 1 Operational Plan Closeout Summary Brief Summary Objective Complete (Yes or No) Carried Over to 2012 Operational Plan Goal # Goal 1 Champions: Ed Parsons, RL and Dave Chaney, NA-SH-20 DOE FTCP FY 11 OPSPLAN Goal 1: Create the 2015 Strategic Vision to Enhance the Technical Competency of the Federal Workforce Objectives Create 2015 Vision Statement Champions: Ed Parsons, RL and Dave Chaney, NA-SH- 20 For DOE to be a technically proficient enterprise, with federal technical personnel overseeing Defense Nuclear Facilities in a manner that enables and enhances the DOE mission in a technically defensible fashion, while being recognized as preeminent in federal technical leadership and competency. (Post on DOE FTCP Website) Yes No

448

2008 Annual Site Environmental Report Summary Pamphlet  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Annual Site Environmental Report Summary Pamphlet Annual Site Environmental Report Summary Pamphlet 1 2008 ASER Summary Pamphlet Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. SAND 2009-4984P annual site environmental report 2 Sandia National Laboratories Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any

449

FTCP 2011 Operational Plan Closeout Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FTCP 2011 Operational Plan Closeout Summary FTCP 2011 Operational Plan Closeout Summary Brief Summary Objective Complete (Yes or No) Carried Over to 2012 Operational Plan Goal # Goal 1 Champions: Ed Parsons, RL and Dave Chaney, NA-SH-20 DOE FTCP FY 11 OPSPLAN Goal 1: Create the 2015 Strategic Vision to Enhance the Technical Competency of the Federal Workforce Objectives Create 2015 Vision Statement Champions: Ed Parsons, RL and Dave Chaney, NA-SH- 20 For DOE to be a technically proficient enterprise, with federal technical personnel overseeing Defense Nuclear Facilities in a manner that enables and enhances the DOE mission in a technically defensible fashion, while being recognized as preeminent in federal technical leadership and competency. (Post on DOE FTCP Website)

450

Natural Gas Annual, 2001  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 1 EIA Home > Natural Gas > Natural Gas Data Publications Natural Gas Annual, 2001 The Natural Gas Annual, 2001 provides information on the supply and disposition of natural gas in the United States. Production, transmission, storage, deliveries, and price data are published by State for 2001. Summary data are presented for each State for 1997 to 2001. The data that appear in the tables of the Natural Gas Annual, 2001 are available as self-extracting executable files in ASCII TXT or CSV file format. This volume emphasizes information for 2001, although some tables show a five-year history. Please read the file entitled README.V1 for a description and documentation of information included in this file. Also available are files containing the following data: Summary Statistics - Natural Gas in the United States, 1997-2001 (Table 1) ASCII TXT, and Natural Gas Supply and Disposition by State, 2001 (Table 2) ASCII TXT.

451

Saltcreek Project Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Project Summary Project Summary HELP Index Summary Scenario References Student Pages Subject/Content Area: Environmental Science Target Audience: Middle school level - all students, including gifted, learning-disabled, behavior-disordered and limited English proficient Project Goals: As a result of their participation in the Salt Creek Investigation, the students will develop the abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry. They will increase their understanding of factors affecting environmental quality, including the interdependence of organisms, and human-induced hazards. Students will learn how science and technology can help people solve local, national and global environmental problems. Learner Outcomes: Students will: be able to carry out six types of stream monitoring tests.

452

Compilation of ETR Summaries  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summaries Summaries Office of Technology Innovation and Development Office of Environmental Management November 2011 External Technical Review Summaries Number Title Report Date ETR-1 Flowsheet for the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) March 2006 ETR-2 Tank 48 at the Savannah River Site (SRS) August 2006 ETR-3 Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System (DBVS) for Low Activity Waste (LAW) at Hanford September 2006 ETR-4 Salt Waste Processing Facility Design at the Savannah River Site (SRS) November 2006 ETR-5 Remedial System Performance Improvement for the 200-ZP-1/PW-1 Operable Units at Hanford February 2007 ETR-6 Operational Issues at the Environmental Restoration

453

Environmental consequences of postulate plutonium releases from Atomics International's Nuclear Materials Development Facility (NMDF), Santa Susana, California, as a result of severe natural phenomena  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Potential environmental consequences in terms of radiation dose to people are presented for postulated plutonium releases caused by severe natural phenomena at the Atomics International's Nuclear Materials Development Facility (NMDF), in the Santa Susana site, California. The severe natural phenomena considered are earthquakes, tornadoes, and high straight-line winds. Plutonium deposition values are given for significant locations around the site. All important potential exposure pathways are examined. The most likely 50-year committed dose equivalents are given for the maximum-exposed individual and the population within a 50-mile radius of the plant. The maximum plutonium deposition values likely to occur offsite are also given. The most likely calculated 50-year collective committed dose equivalents are all much lower than the collective dose equivalent expected from 50 years of exposure to natural background radiation and medical x-rays. The most likely maximum residual plutonium contamination estimated to be deposited offsite following the earthquake, and the 150-mph and 170-mph tornadoes are above the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed guideline for plutonium in the general environment of 0.2 ..mu..Ci/m/sup 2/. The deposition values following the 110-mph and the 130-mph tornadoes are below the EPA proposed guideline.

Jamison, J.D.; Watson, E.C.

1982-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Environmental consequences of postulated plutonium releases from General Electric Company Vallecitos Nuclear Center, Vallecitos, California, as a result of severe natural phenomena  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Potential environmental consequences in terms of radiation dose to people are presented for postulated plutonium releases caused by severe natural phenomena at the General Electric Company Vallecitos Nuclear Center, Vallecitos, California. The severe natural phenomena considered are earthquakes, tornadoes, and high straight-line winds. Maximum plutonium deposition values are given for significant locations around the site. All important potential exposure pathways are examined. The most likely 50-year committed dose equivalents are given for the maximum-exposed individual and the population within a 50-mile radius of the plant. The maximum plutonium deposition values likely to occur offsite are also given. The most likely calculated 50-year collective committed dose equivalents are all much lower than the collective dose equivalent expected from 50 years of exposure to natural background radiation and medical x-rays. The most likely maximum residual plutonium contamination estimated to be deposited offsite following the earthquakes, and the 180-mph and 230-mph tornadoes are above the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed guideline for plutonium in the general environment of 0.2 ..mu..Ci/m/sup 2/. The deposition values following the 135-mph tornado are below the EPA proposed guidelines.

Jamison, J.D.; Watson, E.C.

1980-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

455

Final Meeting Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

June 5, 2013 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT & COMMUNICATION COMMITTEE June 5, 2013 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Opening...

456

Final Meeting Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

October 11, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMITTEE October 11, 2012 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary...

457

Final Meeting Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

August 9, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMITTEE August 9, 2012 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Opening...

458

Final Meeting Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7, 2014 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE October 7, 2014 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Opening ......

459

Final Meeting Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

March 5, 2014 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT COMMITEE March 5, 2014 Kennewick, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Welcome and Introduction...

460

Final Meeting Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

September 3, 2014 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT COMMITTEE September 3, 2014 Pasco, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Welcome ......

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Final Meeting Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

October 8, 2014 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD TANK WASTE COMMITTEE October 8, 2014 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Opening ......

462

Executive Summary | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Summary Executive Summary How clean energy investments can be used to spur local economic development. Spurring Local Economic Development with Clean Energy Investments:...

463

Final Meeting Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

March 6, 2013 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE March 6, 2013 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Opening ......

464

Final Meeting Summary Page 1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

meeting (May), but to meet Ecology's submittal timeline, the committee agreed to review the summary and adopt it via email. Ecology will include the final meeting summary...

465

Nevada Test Site Environmental Summary Report 2006  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) directs the management and operation of the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The NTS is the nation's historical testing site for nuclear weapons from 1951 through 1992 and is currently the nation's unique site for ongoing national-security related missions and high-risk operations. NNSA/NSO strives to provide to the public an understanding of the current activities on the NTS, including environmental monitoring and compliance activities aimed at protecting the public and the environment from radiation hazards and from nonradiological impacts. This document is a summary of the Nevada Test Site Environmental Report (NTSER) for calendar year 2006 (see attached compact disc on inside back cover). The NTSER is a comprehensive report of environmental activities performed at the NTS and its satellite facilities over the previous calendar year. It is prepared annually to meet the requirements and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the information needs of NNSA/NSO stakeholders. To provide an abbreviated and more readable version of the NTSER, this summary report is produced. This summary does not include detailed data tables, monitoring methods or design, a description of the NTS environment, or a discussion of all environmental program activities performed throughout the year. The reader may obtain a hard copy of the full NTSER as directed on the inside front cover of this summary report.

Cathy Wills

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Nevada Test Site Summary 2006 (Volume 2)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) directs the management and operation of the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The NTS is the nation's historical testing site for nuclear weapons from 1951 through 1992 and is currently the nation's unique site for ongoing national-security-related missions and high-risk operations. NNSA/NSO strives to provide to the public an understanding of the current activities on the NTS, including environmental monitoring and compliance activities aimed at protecting the public and the environment from radiation hazards and from nonradiological impacts. This document is a summary of the Nevada Test Site Environmental Report (NTSER) for calendar year 2006 (see attached compact disc on inside back cover). The NTSER is a comprehensive report of environmental activities performed at the NTS and its satellite facilities over the previous calendar year. It is prepared annually to meet the requirements and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the information needs of NNSA/NSO stakeholders. To provide an abbreviated and more readable version of the NTSER, this summary report is produced. This summary does not include detailed data tables, monitoring methods or design, a description of the NTS environment, or a discussion of all environmental program activities performed throughout the year. The reader may obtain a hard copy of the full NTSER as directed on the inside front cover of this summary report.

Cathy Wills

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

NISE 2012 Award Summaries  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Table 2012 NISE Awards Summary Table Investigator NERSC repo Hours awarded DOE Office Project Title Gilbert Compo, University of Colorado at Boulder m958 10,000,000 BER Climate...

468

SSRL29 Workshop Summaries  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Workshop Summaries X-ray Imaging and Spectro-microscopy: the Present and the Future< font> (Chairs: John Miao and Keith Hodgson) This workshop provided a forum to discuss the...

469

ExecSummary_SRG _staff_  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Section 180(c) Policy and Procedures Section 180(c) Policy and Procedures This package describes the Section 180(c) Policy and Procedures that the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Office of National Transportation (ONT) staff recommends to Department of Energy (DOE) management. This package concludes eighteen months of intensive cooperative work by several stakeholder groups and OCRWM staff. There are three parts to this package: (1) the Executive Summary; (2) two Federal Register Notices -- the Draft Section 180(c) Policy and Procedures and the Draft Grant Application Package; and (3) the Appendices. Background Section 180(c) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act requires DOE to "provide technical assistance and funds to States for training for public safety officials of appropriate units of

470

EA-1976: Emera CNG, LLC Compressed Natural Gas Project, Florida...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

1976: Emera CNG, LLC Compressed Natural Gas Project, Florida EA-1976: Emera CNG, LLC Compressed Natural Gas Project, Florida SUMMARY This EA will evaluate the potential...

471

EIS-0498: Magnolia Liquefied Natural Gas Project, Calcasieu Parish...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Magnolia Liquefied Natural Gas Project, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana EIS-0498: Magnolia Liquefied Natural Gas Project, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana Summary The Federal Energy...

472

Fact Sheet: Efficiency Standards for Natural Gas Compressors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 Fact Sheet: Efficiency Standards for Natural Gas Compressors Summary: DOE will take the first step toward establishing energy efficiency standards for new natural gas compressor...

473

National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Ofice of Secure Transportation mKlK= Box RQMM= ^luquerqueI= kj= UTNUR= ;JAN 03 213 MEMORANDUM FOR GREGORY eK= WOODS GENERAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FROM: SUBJECT: JEFFREY P. HARREL ASSIST ANT DEPU FOR SECURE 2013 ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY In response to your memorandum of December TI= 2012, the following information is provided for the National Nuclear Security Administration Ofice of Secure

474

E-Print Network 3.0 - advanced nuclear power Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: advanced nuclear power Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Nuclear Engineering Graduate Program Summary: Power...

475

E-Print Network 3.0 - advanced nuclear engineering Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: advanced nuclear engineering Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Nuclear Engineering Graduate Program Summary:...

476

E-Print Network 3.0 - automated nuclear chemistry Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: automated nuclear chemistry Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 Dr. Jeff Fortner Nuclear Power Summary: Dr....

477

E-Print Network 3.0 - alternative nuclear fuel Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Summary: of electricity from nuclear power plants is far less than any of the alternative energy technologies now contem... Processing of Nuclear Fuel, EGRN 430 ...

478

E-Print Network 3.0 - astrophysical nuclear reactions Sample...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Physics 2 Nuclear data for astrophysics Michael S. Smitha Summary: to determine thermonuclear reaction rates and Q-values to determine releases of nuclear energy. Astrophysical...

479

E-Print Network 3.0 - a-1 nuclear power Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technical and Political Assessment of Peaceful Nuclear Power Program Prospects in North Africa and the Summary: PNNL-16840 Technical and Political Assessment of Peaceful Nuclear...

480

Comparing the Risk Profiles of Renewable and Natural Gas Electricity Contracts  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Comparing the Risk Profiles of Renewable and Natural Gas Electricity Contracts: A Summary.............................................................................20 B. Natural Gas Tolling Contracts.............................................................................24 B. Natural Gas Tolling Contracts

Kammen, Daniel M.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nuclear summary natural" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Executive Summary Introduction  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the testing of nuclear weapons. In response to the Congressional request, DHHS (primarily two DHHS agencies estimates of doses and health risks from exposure to radioactive fallout from nuclear weapons tests of the Health Consequences to the American Population from Nuclear Weapons Tests Conducted by the United States

482

The Particle Adventure | What holds it together? | Interaction summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Interaction summary Interaction summary Interaction summary This is a summary of the different interactions, their force carrier particles, and what particles they act on: Which fundamental interaction is responsible for: Friction? Answer Friction is caused by residual electromagnetic interactions between the atoms of the two materials. Nuclear bonding? Answer Nuclear bonding is caused by residual strong interactions between the various parts of the nucleus. Planetary orbits? Answer The planets orbit because of the gravity that attracts them to the sun! Even though gravity is a relatively weak force, it still has very important effects on the world. Other questions: Which interactions act on neutrinos? Answer Weak and Gravity Which interaction has heavy carriers? Answer Weak (W+, W-, and Z)

483

STEP Participant Survey Executive Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

STEP Participant Survey Executive Summary, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

484

Philadelphia Summary of Reported Data  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Summary of data reported by Better Buildings Neighborhood Program partner Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

485

nuclear electricity | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

nuclear electricity nuclear electricity Dataset Summary Description This dataset presents summary information related to world nuclear energy. It is part of a supporting dataset for the book World On the Edge: How to Prevent Environmental and Economic Collapse by Lester R. Source Earth Policy Institute Date Released January 12th, 2011 (3 years ago) Date Updated Unknown Keywords EU nuclear nuclear electricity world Data application/vnd.ms-excel icon Summary nuclear energy consumption data (xls, 68.6 KiB) Quality Metrics Level of Review Some Review Comment Temporal and Spatial Coverage Frequency Time Period License License Open Data Commons Attribution License Comment "Reuse of our data is permitted. We merely ask that wherever it is listed, it be appropriately cited"

486

ENDF-201, ENDF/B-VI summary documentation supplement 1, ENDF/HE-VI summary documentation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC) provides coordination for and serves as the secretariat to the Cross Section Evaluation Working Group (CSWEG). CSEWG is responsible for the oversight of the ENDF/B Evaluated Nuclear Data File. All data are checked and reviewed by CSEWG, and the file is maintained at the NNDC. For a description of the ENDF/B-VI file, see the ENDF-102 Data Formats and Procedures for the Evaluated Nuclear Data File ENDF-6. The purpose of this addendum to the ENDF/B-VI Summary Documentation is to provide documentation of Releases 1, 2, 3, and 4 for the ENDF/B-VI and ENDF/HE-VI evaluated nuclear data libraries. These releases contain many new and revised evaluations for the neutron, photo-atomic interaction, radioactive decay data, spontaneous fission product yield, neutron-induced fission product yield, thermal neutron scattering, proton, deuteron, and triton sublibraries. The summaries have been extracted mainly from the ENDF/B-VI File 1 comments (MT = 451), which have been checked, edited, and may also include supplementary information. Some summaries have been provided by the evaluators in electronic format, while others are extracted from reports on the evaluations. All references have been checked and corrected, or updated where appropriate. A list of the laboratories which have contributed evaluations used in ENDF/B-VI is given.

McLane, V.

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

487

FY 2014 Metric Summary | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

4 Metric Summary FY 2014 Metric Summary FY 2014 Q1 Metric Summary.pdf FY 2014 Q2 Metric Summary.pdf FY 2014 Q3 Metric Summary.pdf More Documents & Publications FY 2014 Q3 Metric...

488

Microsoft PowerPoint - TWCB Summary Aug12r1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary Summary Tank Waste Corporate Board Summary www.em.doe.gov 1 Tank Waste Corporate Board Summary Tank Waste Corporate Board Summary Ken Picha, Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Tank Waste & Nuclear Material Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting August 1 August 1- -2, 2012 Idaho Falls 2, 2012 Idaho Falls TWCB Meeting Overview August 1-2, 2012 meeting in Idaho Falls 41 participants from HQ and Field; DOE, Contractors, and Labs * EM-20, EM-21, EM-23, EM-10, EM-30 * Idaho, ORP, Savannah River, West Valley * SRNL and PNNL * Guests from EFCOG and URS Corporate Included tour of Integrated Waste Treatment Unit www.em.doe.gov 2 Included tour of Integrated Waste Treatment Unit TWCB Meeting Administration Meeting location rotates -

489

FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

7 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National 7 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC,

490

FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security,

491

Annual Planning Summaries By Office | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Annual Planning Summaries By Office Annual Planning Summaries By Office Annual Planning Summaries By Office SECRETARIAL OFFICES Advanced Research and Projects Agency (ARPA-E) Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EE) Environmental Management (EM) Fossil Energy (FE) Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Intelligence and Counterintelligence (IN) Legacy Management (LM) Loan Programs Office (LPO) Nuclear Energy (NE) Science (SC) POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Southeastern Power Administration (SEPA) Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) DOE FIELD OFFICES Ames Site Office (ASO) Argonne Site Office (See SC APS) Berkeley Site Office (BSO) Brookhaven Site Office (BHSO) (See SC APS)

492

Nuclear Energy Page 570Page 570  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Nuclear Energy Page 570Page 570 #12;Energy Supply and Conservation/ Nuclear Energy FY 2007;Energy Supply and Conservation/Nuclear Energy/ Overview FY 2007 Congressional Budget Energy Supply and Conservation Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Overview Appropriation Summary by Program

493

ESPC ENABLE: ECM Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ESPC ENABLE: ECM Summary ESPC ENABLE: ECM Summary ECM Included Not Included Lighting * Lamps, Ballasts, Fixtures * Controls: Occupancy, Day lighting (on/off, dimming) * Solar Lighting (off-grid installations allowed) Water * Sanitary plumbing fixtures: sinks, toilets, urinals, showers * Irrigation * Leak repair * Domestic/commercial hot water heaters * Water based appliances: dishwasher, ice machine, clothes washer, etc. * Heating/Cooling system improvements (cooling towers, once through cooling, condensate reclaim) HVAC Controls Whole building control strategies including: * Time/Temperature Set-back * Demand/Night Ventilation * Advanced Controls 1 : Energy Management Control Systems (EMCS) / Building Automation Systems (BAS) HVAC Equipment Basic whole building/system one-for-one replacement

494

ESPC ENABLE: ECM Summary  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ESPC ENABLE: ECM Summary ESPC ENABLE: ECM Summary ECM Included Not Included Lighting * Lamps, Ballasts, Fixtures * Controls: Occupancy, Day lighting (on/off, dimming) * Solar Lighting (off-grid installations allowed) Water * Sanitary plumbing fixtures: sinks, toilets, urinals, showers * Irrigation * Leak repair * Domestic/commercial hot water heaters * Water based appliances: dishwasher, ice machine, clothes washer, etc. * Heating/Cooling system improvements (cooling towers, once through cooling, condensate reclaim) HVAC Controls Whole building control strategies including: * Time/Temperature Set-back * Demand/Night Ventilation * Advanced Controls 1 : Energy Management Control Systems (EMCS) / Building Automation Systems (BAS) HVAC Equipment Basic whole building/system one-for-one replacement

495

POWER PLANT RELIABILITY-AVAILABILITY AND STATE REGULATION. VOLUME 7 OF THE FINAL REPORT ON HEALTH AND SAFETY IMPACTS OF NUCLEAR, GEOTHERMAL, AND FOSSIL-FUEL ELECTRIC GENERATION IN CALIFORNIA  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Response Planning for Nuclear Power Plants in California,"Densities Surrounding Nuclear Power Plants," by A.V. Nero,Summary of Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience for

Nero, A.V.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

496

Natural Nuclear Reactor Oklo and Variation of Fundamental Constants Part 1: Computation of Neutronics of Fresh Core  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Using modern methods of reactor physics we have performed full-scale calculations of the natural reactor Oklo. For reliability we have used recent version of two Monte Carlo codes: Russian code MCU REA and world wide known code MCNP (USA). Both codes produce similar results. We have constructed a computer model of the reactor Oklo zone RZ2 which takes into account all details of design and composition. The calculations were performed for three fresh cores with different uranium contents. Multiplication factors, reactivities and neutron fluxes were calculated. We have estimated also the temperature and void effects for the fresh core. As would be expected, we have found for the fresh core a significant difference between reactor and Maxwell spectra, which was used before for averaging cross sections in the Oklo reactor. The averaged cross section of Sm-149 and its dependence on the shift of resonance position (due to variation of fundamental constants) are significantly different from previous results. Contrary to results of some previous papers we find no evidence for the change of the fine structure constant in the past and obtain new, most accurate limits on its variation with time: -4 10^{-17}year^{-1} < d alpha/dt/alpha < 3 10^{-17} year^{-1} A further improvement in the accuracy of the limits can be achieved by taking account of the core burnup. These calculations are in progress.

Yu. V. Petrov; A. I. Nazarov; M. S. Onegin; V. Yu. Petrov; E. G. Sakhnovsky

2005-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

497

National Nuclear Security Administration  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AI~W~~l AI~W~~l 11Vl'~~4 National Nuclear Security Administration Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office P.O. Box 98518 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8518 JAN! 8 2013 Gregory H. Woods, General Counsel, DOE/HQ (GC-1) FORS NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA SITE OFFICE (NNSA/NSO) NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) ANNUAL SUMMARY In accordance with DOE Order 451.1B, National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program, NNSA/NSO is submitting the enclosed Annual NEP A Planning Summary. The document provides a brief description of ongoing and planned NEP A actions for calendar year 2013. This summary provides information for completion of the Site- Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada.

498

Summary of Audit Report: IG-0772  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Audit Report Audit Report U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services The National Nuclear Security Administration's Management of Classified Weapons Parts DOE/IG-0772 July 2007 This document provides a summary of an Audit Report that is not publicly releasable. Public release is controlled pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act This is ( I .sr~mmclry qf A ut fit Report IG-0 772, entitled "The Natiotoncl I Nucleclr Seczdritj' Administr~rtion's Munrcgement of Clnssrfieci Weapons Purls. " The complete report is not crvc~il~rhle for p~dhlic disclosu~e. BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) maintains the safety, security, reliability and perfomiance of the United States nuclear

499

Microsoft Word - Summary Acronyms.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office Office National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department of Energy Past Present Future Summary Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico DOE/EIS-0380 May 2008 iii COVER SHEET Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Title: Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (SWEIS) (DOE/EIS-0380) Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico For additional information or for copies of the SWEIS, contact: Elizabeth Withers, EIS Document Manager NNSA Service Center - Albuquerque National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box 5400

500

Natural nuclear reactor at Oklo and variation of fundamental constants: Computation of neutronics of a fresh core  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Using modern methods of reactor physics, we performed full-scale calculations of the Oklo natural reactor. For reliability, we used recent versions of two Monte Carlo codes: the Russian code MCU-REA and the well-known international code MCNP. Both codes produced similar results. We constructed a computer model of the Oklo reactor zone RZ2 which takes into account all details of design and composition. The calculations were performed for three fresh cores with different uranium contents. Multiplication factors, reactivities, and neutron fluxes were calculated. We also estimated the temperature and void effects for the fresh core. As would be expected, we found for the fresh core a significant difference between reactor and Maxwell spectra, which had been used before for averaging cross sections in the Oklo reactor. The averaged cross section of 62149Sm and its dependence on the shift of a resonance position Er (due to variation of fundamental constants) are significantly different from previous results. Contrary to the results of previous papers, we found no evidence of a change of the samarium cross section: a possible shift of the resonance energy is given by the limits -73??Er?62 meV. Following tradition, we have used formulas of Damour and Dyson to estimate the rate of change of the fine structure constant ?. We obtain new, more accurate limits of -410-17??/??310-17?yr-1. Further improvement of the accuracy of the limits can be achieved by taking account of the core burn-up. These calculations are in progress.

Yu. V. Petrov; A. I. Nazarov; M. S. Onegin; V. Yu. Petrov; E. G. Sakhnovsky

2006-12-14T23:59:59.000Z