National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for nuclear summary natural

  1. Connecticut Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    67-2005 Citygate 6.58 5.92 5.12 5.42 5.61 4.07 1984-2015 Residential 14.93 13.83 14.17 13.32 14.13 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 9.55 8.48 8.40 9.20 10.24 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 9.60 9.16 8.83 6.85 8.07 6.37 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 16.31 18.59 13.70 1992-2012 Electric Power 5.70 5.09 3.99 6.23 6.82 4.73 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1996 Withdrawals 1973-1996 Net Withdrawals 1973-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 651 655 743 558

  2. Delaware Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    78-2005 Citygate 5.67 9.03 7.19 5.67 5.54 NA 1984-2015 Residential 15.12 15.38 15.24 13.65 13.21 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 13.26 13.58 13.31 11.78 11.42 10.70 1967-2015 Industrial 10.18 11.69 11.61 11.24 10.95 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 24.55 28.76 30.97 1995-2012 Electric Power W W -- -- W -- 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1967-1975 Withdrawals 1967-1975 Net Withdrawals 1967-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 73 64 117 63 157 1980-2014

  3. Wisconsin Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.14 5.65 4.88 4.88 6.96 4.71 1984-2015 Residential 10.34 9.77 9.27 8.65 10.52 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 8.53 8.03 7.34 6.94 8.74 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 7.56 7.05 5.81 6.02 8.08 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 7.84 6.10 5.71 1989-2012 Electric Power 5.43 4.91 3.27 4.47 5.47 W 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1973 Withdrawals 1974-1975 Net Withdrawals 1973-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions

  4. Summary References | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Summary References | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the...

  5. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administrat...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    National Nuclear Security Administration 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and...

  6. Summary References | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Summary References | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA

  7. Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure ...

  8. New Jersey Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.41 7.53 6.74 6.21 6.21 NA 1984-2015 Residential 12.84 11.78 11.09 10.89 9.69 8.37 1967-2015 Commercial 10.11 9.51 8.50 9.55 10.08 8.52 1967-2015 Industrial 9.63 9.23 7.87 8.19 10.45 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1994-2012 Electric Power 5.66 5.24 3.63 4.34 4.83 2.96 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1967-1996 Withdrawals 1967-1996 Net Withdrawals 1967-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet)

  9. North Carolina Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.02 5.45 4.00 4.63 5.41 NA 1984-2015 Residential 12.50 12.55 12.19 11.83 11.88 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 10.18 9.64 8.62 8.81 9.12 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 8.24 7.70 6.37 6.87 7.55 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 9.77 12.13 6.48 1990-2012 Electric Power W W W W 6.05 W 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1996 Withdrawals 1974-1996 Net Withdrawals 1973-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 4,410

  10. Rhode Island Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10.05 8.22 4.11 4.01 4.03 NA 1984-2015 Residential 16.48 15.33 14.29 14.55 15.14 14.23 1967-2015 Commercial 14.46 13.33 12.31 12.37 12.89 11.97 1967-2015 Industrial 12.13 10.98 9.78 9.04 10.27 9.26 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 11.71 8.61 16.32 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.45 5.10 3.98 5.84 W W 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1996 Withdrawals 1973-1996 Net Withdrawals 1973-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 468 430 517 624 0 1980-2014

  11. South Carolina Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6.17 5.67 4.57 5.11 5.22 3.90 1984-2015 Residential 13.01 12.93 13.25 12.61 12.65 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 10.34 9.68 8.67 9.10 9.55 8.37 1967-2015 Industrial 6.12 5.60 4.30 5.27 6.13 4.39 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 11.16 8.85 9.77 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1975 Withdrawals 1973-1975 Net Withdrawals 1973-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 1,360 1,386 391 879 1,371 1980-2014 Withdrawals 1,574

  12. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    APS-2012-NE.xls More Documents & Publications 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the West Valley Demonstration Project 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security...

  13. Nuclear Energy Innovation Workshops. Executive Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Allen, Todd; Jackson, John; Hildebrandt, Phil; Baker, Suzy

    2015-06-01

    The nuclear energy innovation workshops were organized and conducted by INL on March 2-4, 2015 at the five NUC universities and Boise State University. The output from these workshops is summarized with particular attention to final summaries that were provided by technical leads at each of the workshops. The current revision includes 3-4 punctuation corrections and a correction of the month of release from May to June.

  14. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the National Nuclear Security Administration. Office spreadsheet icon APS-2012-NA-123.xls More Documents & Publications 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Livermore Site Office 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy 2012 Annual Planning

  15. Nuclear Energy In the United States Executive Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    0 Status and Outlook for Nuclear Energy In the United States Executive Summary The U.S. nuclear power industry continues to make pro- gress toward the construction of new nuclear...

  16. 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program. PDF icon NNSA_NR_NEPA-APS-2013.pdf More Documents & Publications 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the West Valley Demonstration Project 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Nevada Field Office 2012

  17. Summary Pamphlet, Nuclear Safety at the Department of Energy | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Summary Pamphlet, Nuclear Safety at the Department of Energy Summary Pamphlet, Nuclear Safety at the Department of Energy September 2010 This pamphlet is developed as part of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) outreach and awareness campaign to proactively advance safe execution of the DOE mission. It is intended to provide an abbreviated summary of regulatory requirements and processes for ensuring nuclear safety at DOE, which serve as the Department's overarching

  18. National Nuclear Security Administration Appropriation and Program Summary Tables

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    34 National Nuclear Security Administration Appropriation and Program Summary Tables Outyear Appropriation Summary Tables FY 2012 BUDGET TABLES National Nuclear Security Administration Overview Appropriation Summary Outyear Appropriation Summary NNSA Future-Years Nuclear Security Program (FYNSP) $ % $ % National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator 420,754 448,267 420,754 450,060 29,306 7.0% 1,793 0.4% Weapons Activities 6,386,371 7,008,835 7,008,835 7,629,716 1,243,345

  19. FY 2009 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  20. FY 2010 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  1. FY 2011 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  2. FY 2012 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  3. Summary of Prometheus Radiation Shielding Nuclear Design Analysis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    J. Stephens

    2006-01-13

    This report transmits a summary of radiation shielding nuclear design studies performed to support the Prometheus project. Together, the enclosures and references associated with this document describe NRPCT (KAPL & Bettis) shielding nuclear design analyses done for the project.

  4. Summary of nuclear fuel reprocessing activities around the world

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mellinger, P.J.; Harmon, K.M.; Lakey, L.T.

    1984-11-01

    This review of international practices for nuclear fuel reprocessing was prepared to provide a nontechnical summary of the current status of nuclear fuel reprocessing activities around the world. The sources of information are widely varied.

  5. Summary, Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development Plan |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Summary, Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development Plan Summary, Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development Plan In 1998, DOE established the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee (NERAC) to provide advice to the Secretary and to the Director, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology (NE), on the broad range of non-defense DOE nuclear technology programs. The NERAC recommended development of a long-range R&D program. This R&D

  6. FY 2006 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases

  7. FY 2006 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for

  8. FY 2006 University of California (LANL), PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration University of California (LANL), PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo

  9. FY 2007 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases

  10. FY 2007 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for

  11. FY 2007 University of California, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration University of California, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply

  12. FY 2008 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases

  13. FY 2008 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for

  14. FY 2009 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases

  15. FY 2009 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for

  16. FY 2010 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases

  17. FY 2010 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for

  18. FY 2011 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases

  19. FY 2011 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for

  20. FY 2012 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases

  1. FY 2012 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for

  2. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, April 2012 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    April 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, April 2012 April 30, 2012 - 12:31pm Addthis Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary The U.S. NRC voted to approve the issuance of the COLs for Southern Nuclear's Vogtle Units 3 and 4 on February 9, 2012. The issuance marks the first COL ever to be issued and the construction of a new nuclear power plant in more than 30 years. SCE&G's V.C Summer Units 2 and 3 received approval for COLs on March 30, 2012, making them the second US new-build in 30

  3. Natural Gas: A Preliminary Summary 1998

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    1999-01-01

    This special report provides preliminary natural gas data for 1998 which were reported on monthly surveys of the industry through December.

  4. Natural Gas: A Preliminary Summary 1999

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2000-01-01

    This special report provides preliminary natural gas data for 1999 which were reported on monthly surveys of the industry through December.

  5. ,"U.S. Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...10US3","N3020US3","N3035US3","N3045US3" "Date","U.S. Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Price of U.S. Natural Gas Imports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic ...

  6. FY 2006 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our

  7. FY 2006 University of California (LLNL), PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration LLNL), PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our

  8. FY 2007 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration 7 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for

  9. Summary: U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Summary: U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves 2009 November 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Oil, Gas, and Coal Supply...

  10. U.S. Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 View History Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Wellhead NA NA NA NA NA NA 1973-2015 Imports 2.66 2.74 2.75 3.23 2.40 2.28 1989-2015 By Pipeline 2.44 2.51 2.49 2.37 2.19 2.13 1997-2015 As Liquefied Natural Gas 4.53 3.45 6.03 12.38 4.20 4.02 1997-2015 Exports 3.06 3.09 2.92 2.73 2.63 2.57 1989-2015 By Pipeline 2.96 2.99 2.84 2.66 2.35 2.30 1997-2015 As Liquefied Natural Gas 8.10 7.91 7.17 6.53 16.67 15.95 1997-2015 Citygate 4.65 4.58 4.54 4.00 3.68

  11. U.S. Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    48 3.95 2.66 NA NA NA 1922-2015 Imports 4.52 4.24 2.88 3.83 5.30 3.24 1985-2015 By Pipeline 4.46 4.09 2.79 3.73 5.21 2.84 1985-2015 As Liquefied Natural Gas 4.94 5.63 4.27 6.80 8.85 7.37 1985-2015 Exports 5.02 4.64 3.25 4.08 5.51 3.07 1985-2015 By Pipeline 4.75 4.35 3.08 4.06 5.40 2.94 1985-2015 As Liquefied Natural Gas 9.53 10.54 12.82 13.36 15.66 10.92 1985-2015 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.18 5.63 4.73 4.88 5.71 4.25 1973-2015 Residential 11.39 11.03 10.65 10.32 10.97

  12. Nuclear Safety Workshop Summary | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    On September 19-20, 2012, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) held a second Nuclear Safety Workshop covering the results of the Department's actions to improve its posture for...

  13. Microsoft Word - Nuclear_Astrophysics_Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Astrophysics Working Group Report Convenors: J. A. Clark (ANL) and C. M. Deibel (LSU) The nuclear astrophysics session consisted of six invited talks and one contributed talk, which spanned a fairly large range of astrophysical processes from those involving nuclei close to or at stability to those far from stability over a variety of masses:  A. A. Chen (McMaster University): Classical Novae, Type I X-ray Bursts and ATLAS  S. Almaraz-Calderon (ANL): Fusion Reactions in Nuclear

  14. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2014

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    4 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - October 2014 Page 1 News Updates  The NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) has ruled that Toshiba's participation in Nuclear Innovation North America's South Texas Project does not violate federal rules on foreign ownership, control or domination of nuclear reactors. NRC staff had previously stated that despite having only a 10% ownership stake in the project, Toshiba's level of financial support constituted an impermissible

  15. US nuclear power plant operating cost and experience summaries

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kohn, W.E.; Reid, R.L.; White, V.S.

    1998-02-01

    NUREG/CR-6577, U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Operating Cost and Experience Summaries, has been prepared to provide historical operating cost and experience information on U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. Cost incurred after initial construction are characterized as annual production costs, representing fuel and plant operating and maintenance expenses, and capital expenditures related to facility additions/modifications which are included in the plant capital asset base. As discussed in the report, annual data for these two cost categories were obtained from publicly available reports and must be accepted as having different degrees of accuracy and completeness. Treatment of inconclusive and incomplete data is discussed. As an aid to understanding the fluctuations in the cost histories, operating summaries for each nuclear unit are provided. The intent of these summaries is to identify important operating events; refueling, major maintenance, and other significant outages; operating milestones; and significant licensing or enforcement actions. Information used in the summaries is condensed from annual operating reports submitted by the licensees, plant histories contained in Nuclear Power Experience, trade press articles, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) web site (www.nrc.gov).

  16. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - October 2015 Page 1 News Updates  DTE Energy has received a license to build and operate an ESBWR light water reactor at its Fermi site in Newport, Michigan; the company has not committed to building a new plant, but is retaining the option for long-term planning purposes.  The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has voted to grant the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation authority to issue a full power operating license to Tennessee

  17. Nuclear Safety Research and Development Status Workshop Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NSR&D STATUS WORKSHOP SUMMARIES Caroline Garzon Chief of Nuclear Safety Staff NUCLEAR SAFETY R&D  Perform a peer review of Risk Assessment Corporation WTP analysis by a team and identify  Using other benchmarked dispersion codes, determine appropriate input parameters (including deposition velocity) for 95 th percentile analysis using MACCS2 code by considering representative DOE Sites. EFCOG SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKSHOP Large interest in dispersion modeling topics  Presentations in

  18. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY APRIL 2014

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    4 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - July 2014 Page 1 News Updates  On February 20, Secretary Moniz announced the issuance of loan guarantees totalling approximately $6.5 billion to Georgia Power Company and Oglethorpe Power Company for the construction of two new nuclear reactors at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant. The Department continues to work on the remaining conditional commitment for a $1.8 billion loan guarantee to Municipal Electric Authority of

  19. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY OCTOBER 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - January 2016 Page 1 News Updates  The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an operating license for Tennessee Valley Authority's Watts Bar 2 reactor. This marks the end of unit 2 construction; TVA plans to begin commercial operation of the 1,150 MW reactor in early 2016.  The Calvert Cliffs and Callaway COLAs have been withdrawn following the suspension of the Areva US-EPR Design Certification application. The Bell Bend COL

  20. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JANUARY 2014

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    4 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - April 2014 Page 1 News Updates  Luminant has requested a suspension of the NRC's review of its Comanche Peak Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) application. The company cited impacts to the review schedule of the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries US Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (US- APWR) due to the vendor's desire to refocus its resources to reactor restarts in Japan as well as low electricity prices driven by low natural

  1. SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND CHARACTERISTICS AT NUCLEAR FACILITY SITES

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Summary of Revised Tornado, Hurricane and Extreme Straight Wind Characteristics at Nuclear Facility Sites BY: John D. Stevenson Consulting Engineer

  2. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy (NE) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Nuclear Energy (NE) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy (NE) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Nuclear Energy (NE). PDF icon 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy (NE) More Documents & Publications 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, RMOTC, and Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office 2011 Annual Planning Summary for NNSA Service Center

  3. Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors Utility Requirements Document Small Modular Reactors Inclusion Summary

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors Utility Requirements Document Small Modular Reactors Inclusion Summary November 2014

  4. Natural Resources Defense Council Consent Decree, May 26, 1988 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Decree No. 1:85-2583-6 State South Carolina Agreement Type Consent Decree Legal Driver(s) RCRA Scope Summary Establish guidelines for the closure of certain facilities at the Savannah River Plant. Parties DOE (SRP); State of South Carolina (Department of Health and Environmental Control); US DOJ; Natural Resources Defense Council; Energy Research Foundation; Assistant U.S. Attorney of the District of South Carolina; South Carolina League of Women Voters Date 5/26/1988 SCOPE * Establish

  5. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, July 2012 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    July 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, July 2012 July 30, 2012 - 3:27pm Addthis Quarterly News The final ruling on the design certification for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' APWR has been revised until 2015. Structural changes were made to the design by vendor, which requires a new seismic analysis to be performed. Because of this, the review schedule for the COL applications for Comanche Peak and North Anna has been delayed by approximately 18 months. The final ruling on Areva's EPR

  6. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2013 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    January 2013 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2013 January 30, 2013 - 5:59pm Addthis Quarterly Updates On October 22 Dominion Resources Inc. announced that it would close and decommission its Kewaunee Power Station located in Carlton, Wis. after failing to find a buyer for the plant. The company said that the plant closure was a purely economic decision resulting from low projected wholesale electricity prices. Power production will cease in the second quarter of 2013. On November

  7. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, October 2012 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    October 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, October 2012 October 30, 2012 - 8:58am Addthis Quarterly Updates On August 7, NRC issued an order halting issuance of any new construction licenses or license renewals until the Commission can respond to a June 8 court ruling striking down the NRC's waste confidence rule, which assumes that a waste repository will be available "when necessary"; reviews of license applications will continue and the order does not apply to design

  8. 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Nuclear Energy | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Nuclear Energy 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Nuclear Energy The Office of Nuclear Energy has determined that no new EAs or EISs are expected to commence during the next 12 to 24-month period. PDF icon NE-NEPA-APS-2014.pdf More Documents & Publications 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Chicago Office 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Ames Site Office 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Argonne Site Office

  9. National briefing summaries: Nuclear fuel cycle and waste management

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schneider, K.J.; Bradley, D.J.; Fletcher, J.F.; Konzek, G.J.; Lakey, L.T.; Mitchell, S.J.; Molton, P.M.; Nightingale, R.E.

    1991-04-01

    Since 1976, the International Program Support Office (IPSO) at the Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) has collected and compiled publicly available information concerning foreign and international radioactive waste management programs. This National Briefing Summaries is a printout of an electronic database that has been compiled and is maintained by the IPSO staff. The database contains current information concerning the radioactive waste management programs (with supporting information on nuclear power and the nuclear fuel cycle) of most of the nations (except eastern European countries) that now have or are contemplating nuclear power, and of the multinational agencies that are active in radioactive waste management. Information in this document is included for three additional countries (China, Mexico, and USSR) compared to the prior issue. The database and this document were developed in response to needs of the US Department of Energy.

  10. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    January 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 January 30, 2012 - 1:10pm Addthis Quarterly News The U.S. NRC voted to approve the amended AP1000 design certification on December 22, 2011. The Commission also announced the rule would be effective immediately after it was published in the Federal Register on December 30, 2011. A final rule for the GE-ABWR design certification amendment was approved and published in the Federal Register on December 16, 2011. The rule will become

  11. Pena Blanca Natural Analogue Project: Summary of activities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levy, S.; Goldstein, S.; Dobson, P.F.; Goodell, P.; Ku, T.-L.; Abdel-Fattah, A.; Saulnier, G.; Fayek, M.; de la Garza, R.

    2011-02-01

    The inactive Nopal I uranium mine in silicic tuff north of Chihuahua City, Chihuahua, Mexico, was studied as a natural analogue for an underground nuclear-waste repository in the unsaturated zone. Site stratigraphy was confirmed from new drill cores. Data from site studies include chemical and isotopic compositions of saturated- and unsaturated-zone waters. A partial geochronology of uranium enrichment and mineralization was established. Evidence pertinent to uranium-series transport in the soil zone and changing redox conditions was collected. The investigations contributed to preliminary, scoping-level performance assessment modeling.

  12. Pena blanca natural analogue project: summary of activities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levy, Schon S; Goldstein, Steven J; Abdel - Fattah, Amr I

    2010-12-08

    The inactive Nopal I uranium mine in silicic tuff north of Chihuahua City, Chihuahua, Mexico, was studied as a natural analogue for an underground nuclear-waste repository in the unsaturated zone. Site stratigraphy was confirmed from new drill core. Datafrom site studies include chemical and isotopic compositions of saturated- and unsaturated-zone waters. A partial geochronology of uranium enrichment and mineralization was established. Evidence pertinent to uranium-series transport in the soil zone and changing redox conditions was collected. The investigations contributed to preliminary, scoping-level performance assessment modeling.

  13. SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND CHARACTERISTICS AT NUCLEAR FACILITY SITES

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Y : J O H N D . S T E V E N S O N C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R 6 6 1 1 R O C K S I D E R D . I N D E P E N D E N C E , O H I O 4 4 1 3 1 T E L . 2 1 6 - 4 4 7 - 9 4 4 0 E M A I L : J S T E V E N S O N 4 @ E A R T H L I N K . N E T SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND CHARACTERISTICS AT NUCLEAR FACILITY SITES Categorization of Natural Hazard Phenomenon and Operational Load Combinations Prior to the 1988 Uniform Building Code, UBC (1) natural hazard phenomenon

  14. FY 2007 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo

  15. FY 2008 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo

  16. FY 2009 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo

  17. FY 2010 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo

  18. FY 2011 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo

  19. FY 2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo

  20. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    gas is heavily used for power generation. Such conditions could cause a mid-year spike in prices to above 6 per MMBtu. With high natural gas prices, natural gas demand is...

  1. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    economy. In 2003, natural gas demand growth is expected across all sectors. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, July 2002 History Projections Apr-02 Ma May-02 Jun-02...

  2. New York Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    196 281 253 184 144 143 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 196 271 245 178 138 138 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease...

  3. Miscellaneous Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    349 363 393 233 188 185 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 271 353 270 219 169 167 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 78 10 104 7 19 18 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 349 350 379 222 179 17

  4. Mississippi Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    22 858 868 612 600 563 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 884 822 806 550 557 505 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 38 36 62 62 43 58 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 917 853 860 607 595 558

  5. Montana Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    93 959 792 616 590 686 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 681 657 522 327 286 361 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 312 302 270 289 304 325 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 976 944 778 602 575 667

  6. Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Dec. 31 740 725 711 652 264 243 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 9 3 0 0 0 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 731 722 711 652 264 243 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 739 724 710 651 261 240

  7. Florida Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7 56 6 16 15 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 0 26 4 16 14 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 7 30 2 0 1 0 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 7 56 6 16 15 0

  8. ,"Illinois Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Summary" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Prices",5,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1989" ,"Data 2","Production",10,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1991" ,"Data 3","Underground

  9. ,"Iowa Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Summary" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Prices",5,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1989" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",7,"Monthly","12/2015","1/15/1990" ,"Data

  10. Ohio Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    896 832 758 1,235 3,201 7,193 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 799 742 684 1,012 2,887 6,985 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 97 90 74 223 314 208 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 896 832 758 1,233 3,161 6,72

  11. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    change the pattern of annual demand shifts reported in earlier Outlooks. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, December 2002 History Projections Sep-02 Oct-02 Nov-02...

  12. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    to increase because of accelerated economic growth and generally lower prices. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, October 2003 History Projections Jul-03 Aug-03 Sep-03...

  13. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    to increase because of accelerated economic growth and generally lower prices. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, November 2003 History Projections Aug-03 Sep-03 Oct-03...

  14. Oklahoma Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    24,207 28,182 29,937 28,714 28,900 34,319 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 23,115 26,873 27,683 25,018 24,370 27,358 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,092 1,309 2,254 3,696 4,530 6,961 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 22,769 26,345 27,830 26,599 26,873 31,778 1977-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1979-2008

  15. Pennsylvania Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,018 14,068 26,719 36,543 50,078 60,443 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,885 13,924 26,585 36,418 49,809 60,144 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 133 144 134 125 269 299 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 6,985 13,960 26,529 36,348 49,674 59,873 1977-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1979-1981

  16. Texas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    85,034 94,287 104,454 93,475 97,921 105,955 1981-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 76,272 84,157 90,947 74,442 75,754 79,027 1981-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 8,762 10,130 13,507 19,033 22,167 26,928 1981-2014 Dry Natural Gas 80,424 88,997 98,165 86,924 90,349 97,154 1981-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1981

  17. Utah Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,411 7,146 8,108 7,775 7,057 6,970 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,810 6,515 7,199 6,774 6,162 6,098 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 601 631 909 1,001 895 872 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 7,257 6,981 7,857 7,548 6,829 6,685 1977-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1979

  18. Louisiana Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    0,970 29,517 30,545 22,135 20,389 23,258 1981-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 19,898 28,838 29,906 21,362 19,519 22,350 1981-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,072 679 639 773 870 908 1981-2014 Dry Natural Gas 20,688 29,277 30,358 21,949 20,164 22,975 1981-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1981

  19. NM, West Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    2,086 11,809 11,254 9,720 9,459 9,992 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 12,004 11,704 11,111 9,578 9,322 9,766 1979-2014 Natural Gas...

  20. New Mexico Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6,644 16,529 16,138 14,553 14,567 16,426 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 14,662 14,316 13,586 11,734 11,154 11,743 1979-2014 Natural Gas...

  1. Alabama Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,948 2,724 2,570 2,304 1,670 2,121 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,919 2,686 2,522 2,204 1,624 1,980 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 29 38 48 100 46 141 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,871 2,629 2,475 2,228 1,597 2,036

  2. Alaska Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,183 8,917 9,511 9,667 7,383 6,805 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1,090 1,021 976 995 955 954 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 8,093 7,896 8,535 8,672 6,428 5,851 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 9,101 8,838 9,424 9,579 7,316 6,745

  3. Arkansas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10,872 14,181 16,374 11,039 13,524 12,795 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 10,852 14,152 16,328 10,957 13,389 12,606 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 20 29 46 82 135 189 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 10,869 14,178 16,370 11,035 13,518 12,789

  4. Michigan Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,805 2,975 2,549 1,781 1,839 1,873 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,728 2,903 2,472 1,687 1,714 1,765 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 77 72 77 94 125 108 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,763 2,919 2,505 1,750 1,807 1,845

  5. NM, East Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4,558 4,720 4,884 4,833 5,108 6,434 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,658 2,612 2,475 2,156 1,832 1,977 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,900 2,108 2,409 2,677 3,276 4,457 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 4,141 4,226 4,379 4,386 4,633 5,799

  6. North Dakota Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ,213 1,869 2,652 3,974 6,081 6,787 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 143 152 141 105 91 45 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,070 1,717 2,511 3,869 5,990 6,742 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 1,079 1,667 2,381 3,569 5,420 6,034

  7. North Louisiana Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    17,273 26,136 27,411 18,467 17,112 19,837 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 17,220 26,063 27,313 18,385 16,933 19,645 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 53 73 98 82 179 192 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 17,143 26,030 27,337 18,418 17,044 19,722

  8. Virginia Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3,091 3,215 2,832 2,579 2,373 2,800 1982-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,091 3,215 2,832 2,579 2,373 2,800 1982-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 0 0 0 1982-2014 Dry Natural Gas 3,091 3,215 2,832 2,579 2,373 2,800 1982-2014

  9. California Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ,926 2,785 3,042 2,119 2,023 2,260 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 612 503 510 272 247 273 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 2,314 2,282 2,532 1,847 1,776 1,987 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,773 2,647 2,934 1,999 1,887 2,107

  10. Colorado Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4,081 25,372 26,151 21,674 23,533 21,992 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 22,199 23,001 23,633 18,226 19,253 16,510 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,882 2,371 2,518 3,448 4,280 5,482 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 23,058 24,119 24,821 20,666 22,381 20,851

  11. Kansas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3,500 3,937 3,747 3,557 3,772 4,606 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,417 3,858 3,620 3,231 3,339 3,949 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 83 79 127 326 433 657 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 3,279 3,673 3,486 3,308 3,592 4,359

  12. Kentucky Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,919 2,785 2,128 1,515 1,794 1,753 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,887 2,674 2,030 1,422 1,750 1,704 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 32 111 98 93 44 49 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,782 2,613 2,006 1,408 1,663 1,611

  13. West Virginia Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6,090 7,163 10,532 14,881 23,209 31,153 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,066 7,134 10,480 14,860 23,139 31,121 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 24 29 52 21 70 32 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 5,946 7,000 10,345 14,611 22,765 29,432

  14. Wyoming Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    36,748 36,526 36,930 31,636 34,576 28,787 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 36,386 36,192 36,612 30,930 33,774 27,507 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 362 334 318 706 802 1,280 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 35,283 35,074 35,290 30,094 33,618 27,553

  15. [Fuel substitution of vehicles by natural gas: Summaries of four final technical reports

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-05-01

    This report contains summary information on three meetings and highlights of a fourth meeting held by the Society of Automotive Engineers on natural gas fueled vehicles. The meetings covered the following: Natural gas engine and vehicle technology; Safety aspects of alternately fueled vehicles; Catalysts and emission control--Meeting the legislative standards; and LNG--Strengthening the links.

  16. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    levels and 25 percent below the 5-year average. Natural gas prices are likely to stay high as long as above-normal storage injection demand competes with industrial and...

  17. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    3.20 per MMBtu, which is about 0.84 higher than last winter's price. Domestic dry natural gas production is projected to fall by about 1.7 percent in 2002 compared with the...

  18. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    2002). Natural gas prices were higher than expected in October as storms in the Gulf of Mexico in late September temporarily shut in some gas production, causing spot prices at...

  19. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    commercial sector demand are offset by lower demand in the electric power sector. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, September 2003 History Projections Jun-03 Jul-03 Aug-03...

  20. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    by 1.8 percent as the economy continues to expand and prices ease slightly. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, January 2004 History Projections Oct-03 Nov-03 Dec-03...

  1. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    of 2005 relative to the first quarter of 2004 and relatively lower fuel oil prices. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, April 2004 History Projections Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04...

  2. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    should relieve some of the potential upward price pressure on the domestic market Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, January 2003 History Projections Oct-02 Nov-02 Dec-02...

  3. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    because of somewhat weaker prices and higher demand in the electric power sector. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, July 2003 History Projections Apr-03 May-03 Jun-03 Jul-03...

  4. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    than those of 2003, when stocks after the winter of 2002-2003 were at record lows. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, December 2003 History Projections Sep-03 Oct-03 Nov-03...

  5. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    power sector eases and relative coal and fuel oil spot prices decline somewhat. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, May 2004 History Projections Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04...

  6. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    demand in the first quarter of 2005 relative to the first quarter of 2004. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, March 2004 History Projections Dec-03 Jan-04 Feb-04...

  7. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation 2012 Annual Planning Summary for NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation. Office spreadsheet icon APS-2012-NA-20.xls More Documents & Publications EA-1929: Final Environmental Assessment EA-1929: Draft Environmental Assessment Audit Report: OAS-L-12-07

  8. FY 2012 B&W Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration B&W Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases

  9. Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    [ 6450-01-P ] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Lake Charles Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project, Lake Charles, Louisiana AGENCY: Department of Energy ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Proposed Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy

  10. Brief 70 Nuclear Engineering Enrollments and Degrees, 2011 Summary Information

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dr. Don Johnson

    2012-10-31

    The survey includes degrees granted between September 1, 2010 and August 31, 2011. Enrollment information refers to the fall term 2011. The enrollment and degree data include students majoring in nuclear engineering or in an option program equivalent to a major. Thirty-two academic programs reported having nuclear engineering programs during 2011, and data was received from all thirty-two programs. The data for two nuclear engineering programs include enrollments and degrees in health physics options that are also reported in the health physics enrollments and degrees data.

  11. ,"Nevada Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1991" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 4","Consumption",10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  12. ,"New Hampshire Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1980" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  13. ,"New Jersey Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  14. ,"New Mexico Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  15. ,"North Carolina Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  16. ,"Pennsylvania Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",15,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  17. ,"Rhode Island Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  18. ,"South Carolina Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  19. ,"South Dakota Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1984" ,"Data 4","Consumption",11,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  20. ,"Virginia Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  1. ,"Wisconsin Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  2. ,"Alabama Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1968" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  3. ,"Arkansas Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  4. ,"Colorado Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  5. ,"Connecticut Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  6. ,"Delaware Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  7. ,"Maine Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","3/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  8. ,"Maryland Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1999" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  9. ,"Nebraska Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",11,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  10. ,"New York Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  11. ,"Oregon Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1979" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  12. ,"Tennessee Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1968" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",11,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  13. ,"Texas Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  14. ,"U.S. Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1922" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1925" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1900" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",6,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1935" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  15. ,"Washington Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  16. ,"Alaska Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",12,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",6,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  17. ,"California Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  18. ,"Georgia Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1999" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1974" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  19. ,"Idaho Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",2,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1974" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 5","Consumption",9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  20. ,"Indiana Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  1. ,"Louisiana Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  2. ,"Massachusetts Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  3. ,"Minnesota Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  4. ,"Missouri Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","2/29/2016"

  5. Summary Report of the Workshop on The Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Database

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Semkova, V.; Pritychenko, B.

    2014-10-10

    The Workshop on the Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Database (EXFOR) was held at IAEA Headquarters in Vienna from 6 to 10 October 2014. The workshop was organized to discuss various aspects of the EXFOR compilation process including compilation rules, different techniques for nuclear reaction data measurements, software developments, etc. A summary of the presentations and discussions that took place during the workshop is reported here.

  6. Nuclear rapprochement in Argentina and Brazil: Workshop summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    James E. Doyle

    1999-10-01

    On October 21 and 22, 1998, the Center for International Security Affairs at Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Center for Global Security and Cooperation at Science Applications International Corporation hosted the first of a series of work-shops on states that have chosen to roll back their pursuit of nuclear arms. The objective of the workshop series is to conduct a systematic evaluation of the roles played by U.S. nonproliferation policy in cases of nuclear rollback or restraint and to provide recommendations for future nonproliferation efforts based on lessons learned. Key attendees at the workshop included officials and former officials from the foreign ministries of Argentina and Brazil, and current and former officials from the U.S. Department of State, the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), and the Department of Energy (DOE). Scholars and independent researchers who have examined nuclear policy in Argentina and Brazil also participated. This workshop report includes important background information that helps set the stage for assessing nuclear policies in Argentina and Brazil. It describes national perspectives and areas of consensus and debate among the participants, particularly on the questions of lessons learned and their salience to proliferation challenges in other states. It also summarizes key questions and propositions regarding the roles played in these cases by U.S. nonproliferation policy.

  7. Executive Summary - Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Logan, J.; Heath, G.; Macknick, J.; Paranhos, E.; Boyd, W.; Carlson, K.

    2013-01-01

    In November 2012, the Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) released a new report, 'Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity.' The study provides a new methodological approach to estimate natural gas related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, tracks trends in regulatory and voluntary industry practices, and explores various electricity futures. The Executive Summary provides key findings, insights, data, and figures from this major study.

  8. Nuclear Waste Analytical Round Robins 1-6 summary report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, G.L.; Marschman, S.C.

    1993-12-31

    The MCC has conducted six round robins for the waste management, research, and development community from 1987 to present. The laboratories participating regularly are Ames, Argonne, Catholic University, Lawrence Livermore, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Savannah River, and West Valley Nuclear. Glass types analyzed in these round robins all have been simulated nuclear waste compositions expected from vitrification of high-level nuclear waste. A wide range of analytical procedures have been used by the participating laboratories including Atomic Absorption spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy, direct current plasma-emission spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy techniques. Consensus average relative error for Round Robins 1 through 6 is 5.4%, with values ranging from 9.4 to 1.1%. Trend on the average improved with each round robin. When the laboratories analyzed samples over longer periods of time, the intralaboratory variability increased. Lab-to-lab variation accounts for most of the total variability found in all the round robins. Participation in the radiochemistry portion has been minimal, and analytical results poor compared to nonradiochemistry portion. Additional radiochemical work is needed in future round robins.

  9. The U.S. Nuclear Data Network: Summary of the twentieth meeting

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-12-31

    Topics discussed at this meeting were: assessment of the nuclear data program from the perspective of the funding agency; status of high spin evaluations for ENSDF; recommendation for name change of master file from Nuclear Structure Reference to Nuclear Science Reference; status of ENSDF, Table of Isotopes, VuENSDF, on-line system at the NNDC, and Nuclear Data Sheets; summary of the discussion of the Formats and Procedures Subcommittee; long range plan for nuclear structure data; a description of methods of optimization of nuclear structure evaluations and how to evolve this activity into the forefront of research such as high-spin physics; code development which includes improvements in the databases and evaluator tools; and future means of data dissemination.

  10. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2013 News Updates

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    3 News Updates  Dominion Resources, Inc. has informed the NRC that Dominion Virginia Power will amend its COL application to reflect the ESBWR technology by the end of 2013. In 2009 Dominion dropped the ESBWR from its COLA after failing to reach a commercial agreement with General Electric-Hitachi (GEH). A COL is expected no earlier than late 2015. Dominion Virginia Power has not yet committed to building a new nuclear unit at North Anna.  NRC has determined that the latest revision to the

  11. Summary of space nuclear reactor power systems, 1983--1992

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Buden, D.

    1993-08-11

    This report summarizes major developments in the last ten years which have greatly expanded the space nuclear reactor power systems technology base. In the SP-100 program, after a competition between liquid-metal, gas-cooled, thermionic, and heat pipe reactors integrated with various combinations of thermoelectric thermionic, Brayton, Rankine, and Stirling energy conversion systems, three concepts:were selected for further evaluation. In 1985, the high-temperature (1,350 K), lithium-cooled reactor with thermoelectric conversion was selected for full scale development. Since then, significant progress has been achieved including the demonstration of a 7-y-life uranium nitride fuel pin. Progress on the lithium-cooled reactor with thermoelectrics has progressed from a concept, through a generic flight system design, to the design, development, and testing of specific components. Meanwhile, the USSR in 1987--88 orbited a new generation of nuclear power systems beyond the, thermoelectric plants on the RORSAT satellites. The US has continued to advance its own thermionic fuel element development, concentrating on a multicell fuel element configuration. Experimental work has demonstrated a single cell operating time of about 1 1/2-y. Technology advances have also been made in the Stirling engine; an advanced engine that operates at 1,050 K is ready for testing. Additional concepts have been studied and experiments have been performed on a variety of systems to meet changing needs; such as powers of tens-to-hundreds of megawatts and highly survivable systems of tens-of-kilowatts power.

  12. Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Powell, Danny H; Elwood Jr, Robert H

    2011-01-01

    An effective risk assessment system is needed to address the threat posed by an active or passive insider who, acting alone or in collusion, could attempt diversion or theft of nuclear material. The material control and accountability (MC&A) system effectiveness tool (MSET) is a self-assessment or inspection tool utilizing probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) methodology to calculate the system effectiveness of a nuclear facility's material protection, control, and accountability (MPC&A) system. The MSET process is divided into four distinct and separate parts: (1) Completion of the questionnaire that assembles information about the operations of every aspect of the MPC&A system; (2) Conversion of questionnaire data into numeric values associated with risk; (3) Analysis of the numeric data utilizing the MPC&A fault tree and the SAPHIRE computer software; and (4) Self-assessment using the MSET reports to perform the effectiveness evaluation of the facility's MPC&A system. The process should lead to confirmation that mitigating features of the system effectively minimize the threat, or it could lead to the conclusion that system improvements or upgrades are necessary to achieve acceptable protection against the threat. If the need for system improvements or upgrades is indicated when the system is analyzed, MSET provides the capability to evaluate potential or actual system improvements or upgrades. A facility's MC&A system can be evaluated at a point in time. The system can be reevaluated after upgrades are implemented or after other system changes occur. The total system or specific subareas within the system can be evaluated. Areas of potential system improvement can be assessed to determine where the most beneficial and cost-effective improvements should be made. Analyses of risk importance factors show that sustainability is essential for optimal performance and reveals where performance degradation has the greatest impact on total system risk. The risk importance factors show the amount of risk reduction achievable with potential upgrades and the amount of risk reduction achieved after upgrades are completed. Applying the risk assessment tool gives support to budget prioritization by showing where budget support levels must be sustained for MC&A functions most important to risk. Results of the risk assessment are also useful in supporting funding justifications for system improvements that significantly reduce system risk. The functional model, the system risk assessment tool, and the facility evaluation questionnaire are valuable educational tools for MPC&A personnel. These educational tools provide a framework for ongoing dialogue between organizations regarding the design, development, implementation, operation, assessment, and sustainability of MPC&A systems. An organization considering the use of MSET as an analytical tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its MPC&A system will benefit from conducting a complete MSET exercise at an existing nuclear facility.

  13. Summary Report for the Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School 2014

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Runkle, Robert C.; Baciak, James E.; Woodring, Mitchell L.; Jenno, Diana M.

    2014-09-30

    Executive Summary The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) hosted students from across the United States at the 3rd Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School from 16 – 27 June 2014. The summer school provided students with a unique understanding of nuclear security challenges faced in the field and exposed them to the technical foundations, analyses, and insight that will be required by future leaders in technology development and implementation. The course heavily emphasized laboratory and field demonstrations including direct measurements of special nuclear material. Student evaluations and feedback from student advisors indicates that the summer school achieved its objectives of 1) exposing students to the range of nuclear security applications for which radiation detection is necessary, 2) articulating the relevance of student research into the broader context, and 3) exciting students about the possibility of future careers in nuclear security. In fact, we are beginning to see previous students both enroll in graduate programs (former undergraduates) and complete internships at agencies like the National Nuclear Security Administration.

  14. Nature of Transactions (TI) Code | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nature of Transactions (TI) Code | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs

  15. DHS National Technical Nuclear Forensics Program FY 10 Summary Report: Graduate Mentoring Assistance Program (GMAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Martha R. Finck Ph.D.

    2011-10-01

    This program provides practical training to DHS graduate fellows in the DOE laboratory complex. It involves coordinating students, their thesis advisors, and their laboratory project mentors in establishing a meaningful program of research which contributes to the graduate student's formation as a member of the nuclear forensics community. The summary report details the student/mentor experience and future plans after the first summer practicum. This program provides practical training to DHS graduate fellows in the DOE laboratory complex. It involves coordinating students, their thesis advisors, and their laboratory project mentors in establishing a meaningful program of research which contributes to the graduate student's formation as a member of the nuclear forensics community. This final written report includes information concerning the overall mentoring experience, including benefits (to the lab, the mentors, and the students), challenges, student research contributions, and lab mentor interactions with students home universities. Idaho National Laboratory hosted two DHS Nuclear Forensics graduate Fellows (nuclear engineering) in summer 2011. Two more Fellows (radiochemistry) are expected to conduct research at the INL under this program starting in 2012. An undergraduate Fellow (nuclear engineering) who worked in summer 2011 at the laboratory is keenly interested in applying for the NF Graduate Fellowship this winter with the aim of returning to INL. In summary, this program appears to have great potential for success in supporting graduate level students who pursue careers in nuclear forensics. This relatively specialized field may not have been an obvious choice for some who have already shown talent in the traditional areas of chemistry or nuclear engineering. The active recruiting for this scholarship program for candidates at universities across the U.S. brings needed visibility to this field. Not only does this program offer critical practical training to these students, it brings attention to a very attractive field of work where young professionals are urgently required in order for the future. The effectiveness of retaining such talent remains to be seen and may be primarily controlled by the availability of DOE laboratory research funding in this field in the years to come.

  16. Nuclear criticality safety experiments, calculations, and analyses - 1958 to 1982. Volume 2. Summaries. Complilation of papers from the Transactions of the American Nuclear Society

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Koponen, B.L.; Hampel, V.E.

    1982-10-21

    This compilation contains 688 complete summaries of papers on nuclear criticality safety as presented at meetings of the American Nuclear Society (ANS). The selected papers contain criticality parameters for fissile materials derived from experiments and calculations, as well as criticality safety analyses for fissile material processing, transport, and storage. The compilation was developed as a component of the Nuclear Criticality Information System (NCIS) now under development at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The compilation is presented in two volumes: Volume 1 contains a directory to the ANS Transaction volume and page number where each summary was originally published, the author concordance, and the subject concordance derived from the keyphrases in titles. Volume 2 contains-in chronological order-the full-text summaries, reproduced here by permission of the American Nuclear Society from their Transactions, volumes 1-41.

  17. Hydrogen and Hydrogen/Natural Gas Station and Vehicle Operations - 2006 Summary Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Francfort; Donald Karner; Roberta Brayer

    2006-09-01

    This report is a summary of the operations and testing of internal combustion engine vehicles that were fueled with 100% hydrogen and various blends of hydrogen and compressed natural gas (HCNG). It summarizes the operations of the Arizona Public Service Alternative Fuel Pilot Plant, which produces, compresses, and dispenses hydrogen fuel. Other testing activities, such as the destructive testing of a CNG storage cylinder that was used for HCNG storage, are also discussed. This report highlights some of the latest technology developments in the use of 100% hydrogen fuels in internal combustion engine vehicles. Reports are referenced and WWW locations noted as a guide for the reader that desires more detailed information. These activities are conducted by Arizona Public Service, Electric Transportation Applications, the Idaho National Laboratory, and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity.

  18. Table 1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, 2010-2014

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Table 1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, 2010-2014 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Wells Producing at End of Year 487,627 514,637 482,822 R 484,994 514,786 Production (million cubic feet) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells 13,247,498 12,291,070 12,504,227 R 10,759,545 10,384,119 From Oil Wells 5,834,703 5,907,919 4,965,833 R 5,404,699 5,922,088 From Coalbed Wells 1,916,762 1,779,055 1,539,395 R 1,425,783 1,285,189 From Shale Gas Wells 5,817,122 8,500,983

  19. Natural circulating passive cooling system for nuclear reactor containment structure

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Gou, Perng-Fei (Saratoga, CA); Wade, Gentry E. (Saratoga, CA)

    1990-01-01

    A passive cooling system for the contaminant structure of a nuclear reactor plant providing protection against overpressure within the containment attributable to inadvertent leakage or rupture of the system components. The cooling system utilizes natural convection for transferring heat imbalances and enables the discharge of irradiation free thermal energy to the atmosphere for heat disposal from the system.

  20. The Geochemistry of Technetium: A Summary of the Behavior of an Artificial Element in the Natural Environment

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Icenhower, Jonathan P.; Qafoku, Nikolla; Martin, Wayne J.; Zachara, John M.

    2008-12-01

    Interest in the chemistry of technetium has only increased since its discovery in 1937, mainly because of the large and growing inventory of 99Tc generated during fission of 235U, its environmental mobility in oxidizing conditions, and its potential radiotoxicity. For every ton of enriched uranium fuel (3% 235U) that is consumed at a typical burn-up rate, nearly 1 kg of 99Tc is generated. Thus, the mass of 99Tc produced since 1993 has nearly quadrupled, and will likely to continue to increase if more emphasis is placed on nuclear power to slow the accumulation of atmospheric greenhouse gases. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the interaction of 99Tc and the natural environment, we review the sources of 99Tc in the nuclear fuel cycle, its chemical properties, radiochemistry, and biogeochemical behavior. We include an evaluation of the use of Re as a chemical analog of Tc, as well as a summary of the redox potential, thermodynamics, sorption, colloidal behavior, and interaction of humic substances with Tc, and the potential for re-oxidation and remobilization of Tc(IV). What emerges is a more complicated picture of Tc behavior than that of an easily tractable transition of Tc(VII) to Tc(IV) with consequent immobilization. Reducing conditions (+200 to +100 mV Eh) are generally thought necessary to cause reduction of Tc(VII) to Tc(IV), but far more important are the presence of reducing agents, such as Fe(II) sorbed onto mineral grains. Catalysis of Tc(VII) by surface-mediated Fe(II) will bring the mobile Tc(VII) species to a lower oxidation state and will form the relatively insoluble Tc(IV)O2∙nH2O, but even as a solid, equilibrium concentrations of aqueous Tc are nearly a factor of 20× above the EPA set drinking water standards. However, sequestration of Tc(IV) into Fe(III)-bearing phases, such as goethite or other hydrous oxyhydroxides of iron, may ameliorate concerns over the mobility of Tc. Further, the outcome of many studies on terrestrial and marine sediments that are oxidizing overall indicate that Tc is relatively immobile, due to formation of oxygen-depleted microenvironments that develop in response to bacteriological activities. The rate of re-mobilization of Tc from these microenvironments is just beginning to be assessed, but with no firm consensus. Reassessment of the simple models in which Tc is mobilized and immobilized is therefore urged.

  1. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Livermore Site Office | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the West Valley Demonstration Project...

  2. LA, State Offshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    728 386 519 519 420 341 1981-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 215 279 468 391 332 273 1981-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 513 107 51 128 88 68 1981-2014 Dry Natural Gas 701 371 502 502 402 327 1981-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1981

  3. 2010 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA-SC)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

  4. Natural convection heat transfer within horizontal spent nuclear fuel assemblies

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Canaan, R.E.

    1995-12-01

    Natural convection heat transfer is experimentally investigated in an enclosed horizontal rod bundle, which characterizes a spent nuclear fuel assembly during dry storage and/or transport conditions. The basic test section consists of a square array of sixty-four stainless steel tubular heaters enclosed within a water-cooled rectangular copper heat exchanger. The heaters are supplied with a uniform power generation per unit length while the surrounding enclosure is maintained at a uniform temperature. The test section resides within a vacuum/pressure chamber in order to subject the assembly to a range of pressure statepoints and various backfill gases. The objective of this experimental study is to obtain convection correlations which can be used in order to easily incorporate convective effects into analytical models of horizontal spent fuel systems, and also to investigate the physical nature of natural convection in enclosed horizontal rod bundles in general. The resulting data consist of: (1) measured temperatures within the assembly as a function of power, pressure, and backfill gas; (2) the relative radiative contribution for the range of observed temperatures; (3) correlations of convective Nusselt number and Rayleigh number for the rod bundle as a whole; and (4) correlations of convective Nusselt number as a function of Rayleigh number for individual rods within the array.

  5. Next Generation * Natural Gas (NG)2 Information Requirements--Executive Summary

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2000-01-01

    The Energy Information Administration (EIA) has initiated the Next Generation * Natural Gas (NG)2 project to design and implement a new and comprehensive information program for natural gas to meet customer requirements in the post-2000 time frame.

  6. TX, State Offshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    64 131 118 94 59 42 1981-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 161 128 113 88 56 42 1981-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 3 3 5 6 3 0 1981-2014 Dry Natural Gas 164 131 118 94 59 42 1981

  7. CA, Coastal Region Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    169 180 173 305 284 277 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1 2 1 2 2 8 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 168 178 172 303 282 269 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 163 173 165 290 266 261

  8. CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    91 92 102 98 90 84 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 91 92 102 98 90 84 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 84 87 97 93 86 8

  9. CA, State Offshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    57 66 82 66 75 76 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 4 3 3 1 0 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 53 63 79 65 75 76 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 57 66 82 66 75 76

  10. Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    2 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 View History Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation 25,347 22,522 19,288 17,427 14,938 14,008 1992-2007 Dry Natural Gas 24,689 22,059 18,812 17,007 14,549 13,634 1992-2007 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 965 717 713 688 649 620 1992-2007

  11. U.S. Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    283,879 317,647 348,809 322,670 353,994 388,841 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 250,496 281,901 305,986 269,514 295,504 319,724 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 33,383 35,746 42,823 53,156 58,490 69,117 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 272,509 304,625 334,067 308,036 338,264 368,704 1925-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1979

  12. U.S. Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    283,879 317,647 348,809 322,670 353,994 388,841 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 250,496 281,901 305,986 269,514 295,504 319,724 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 33,383 35,746 42,823 53,156 58,490 69,117 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 272,509 304,625 334,067 308,036 338,264 368,704 1925-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1979

  13. TX, RRC District 1 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    523 2,599 6,127 9,141 8,118 12,431 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1,456 2,332 5,227 6,516 4,442 7,733 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 67 267 900 2,625 3,676 4,698 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 1,398 2,399 5,910 8,868 7,784 11,945

  14. TX, RRC District 10 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,594 8,484 8,373 8,007 7,744 8,354 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,984 7,915 7,475 7,073 6,660 7,140 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 610 569 898 934 1,084 1,214 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 6,882 7,663 7,513 7,253 7,034 7,454

  15. TX, RRC District 2 Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    909 2,235 3,690 5,985 6,640 7,524 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1,837 2,101 2,766 3,986 4,348 4,802 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 72 134 924 1,999 2,292 2,722 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 1,800 2,090 3,423 5,462 5,910 6,559

  16. TX, RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,802 2,774 2,490 2,429 2,592 2,483 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,326 2,308 2,091 1,965 1,795 1,760 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 476 466 399 464 797 723 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,616 2,588 2,260 2,154 2,307 2,19

  17. TX, RRC District 4 Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,057 7,392 10,054 9,566 11,101 12,482 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,961 7,301 9,993 9,467 11,038 12,291 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 96 91 61 99 63 191 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 6,728 7,014 9,458 8,743 9,640 11,057

  18. TX, RRC District 5 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    22,623 24,694 28,187 17,640 19,531 18,155 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 22,602 24,686 28,147 17,587 19,354 17,970 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 21 8 40 53 177 185 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 22,343 24,363 27,843 17,331 19,280 17,880

  19. TX, RRC District 6 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    13,257 15,416 15,995 11,726 12,192 12,023 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 12,806 14,958 15,524 11,204 11,553 11,640 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 451 458 471 522 639 383 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 12,795 14,886 15,480 11,340 11,655 11,516

  20. TX, RRC District 7B Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,424 2,625 3,887 3,363 3,267 2,695 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,322 2,504 3,754 3,183 3,040 2,418 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 102 121 133 180 227 277 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,077 2,242 3,305 2,943 2,787 2,290

  1. TX, RRC District 7C Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5,430 5,432 5,236 5,599 5,584 7,103 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,724 3,502 2,857 2,523 2,183 2,444 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,706 1,930 2,379 3,076 3,401 4,659 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 4,827 4,787 4,475 4,890 4,800 6,422

  2. TX, RRC District 8 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,440 8,105 8,088 8,963 9,715 11,575 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,950 3,777 3,006 2,309 2,315 2,480 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 3,490 4,328 5,082 6,654 7,400 9,095 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 6,672 7,206 7,039 7,738 8,629 9,742

  3. TX, RRC District 8A Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    1,289 1,228 1,289 1,280 1,338 1,328 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 43 58 31 20 23 24 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,246 1,170 1,258 1,260 1,315 1,304 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 1,218 1,164 1,226 1,214 1,269 1,257

  4. TX, RRC District 9 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    11,522 13,172 10,920 9,682 10,040 9,760 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 11,100 12,587 9,963 8,521 8,947 8,283 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 422 585 957 1,161 1,093 1,477 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 10,904 12,464 10,115 8,894 9,195 8,791

  5. CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,609 2,447 2,685 1,650 1,574 1,823 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 607 498 506 269 245 265 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 2,002 1,949 2,179 1,381 1,329 1,558 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,469 2,321 2,590 1,550 1,460 1,69

  6. Federal Offshore U.S. Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,856 12,120 10,820 9,853 8,567 8,968 1990-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 7,633 6,916 5,374 3,989 3,037 3,634 1990-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 5,223 5,204 5,446 5,864 5,530 5,334 1990-2014 Dry Natural Gas 12,552 11,765 10,420 9,392 8,193 8,527 1990

  7. Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, Texas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Dec. 31 2,451 2,145 1,554 1,497 1,508 1,445 1981-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1,822 1,456 1,015 643 535 607 1981-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 629 689 539 854 973 838 1981-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,451 2,145 1,554 1,450 1,450 1,397

  8. LA, South Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,969 2,995 2,615 3,149 2,857 3,080 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,463 2,496 2,125 2,586 2,254 2,432 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 506 499 490 563 603 648 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,844 2,876 2,519 3,029 2,718 2,92

  9. Lower 48 States Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    274,696 308,730 339,298 313,003 346,611 382,036 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 249,406 280,880 305,010 268,519 294,549 318,770 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 25,290 27,850 34,288 44,484 52,062 63,266 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 263,408 295,787 324,643 298,457 330,948 361,959

  10. Summary Report for the Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School 2012

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Runkle, Robert C.; Baciak, James E.; Stave, Jean A.

    2012-08-22

    The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) hosted students from across the United States at the inaugural Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School from June 11 22, 2012. The summer school provided students with a unique understanding of nuclear security challenges faced in the field and exposed them to the technical foundations, analyses, and insight that will be required by future leaders in technology development and implementation. The course heavily emphasized laboratory and field demonstrations including direct measurements of special nuclear material. The first week of the summer school focused on the foundational knowledge required by technology practitioners; the second week focused on contemporary applications. Student evaluations and feedback from student advisors indicates that the summer school achieved its objectives of 1) exposing students to the range of nuclear security applications for which radiation detection is necessary, 2) articulating the relevance of student research into the broader context, and 3) exciting students about the possibility of future careers in nuclear security.

  11. FY 2015 Summary Control Table by Organization

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Request Discretionary Summary By Organization Department Of Energy By Organization National Nuclear Security Administration Weapons Activities......

  12. Miscellaneous: Uruguay energy supply options study assessing the market for natural gas - executive summary.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Conzelmann, G.; Veselka, T.; Decision and Information Sciences

    2008-03-04

    Uruguay is in the midst of making critical decisions affecting the design of its future energy supply system. Momentum for change is expected to come from several directions, including recent and foreseeable upgrades and modifications to energy conversion facilities, the importation of natural gas from Argentina, the possibility for a stronger interconnection of regional electricity systems, the country's membership in MERCOSUR, and the potential for energy sector reforms by the Government of Uruguay. The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of several fuel diversification strategies on Uruguay's energy supply system. The analysis pays special attention to fuel substitution trends due to potential imports of natural gas via a gas pipeline from Argentina and increasing electricity ties with neighboring countries. The Government of Uruguay has contracted with Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) to study several energy development scenarios with the support of several Uruguayan institutions. Specifically, ANL was asked to conduct a detailed energy supply and demand analysis, develop energy demand projections based on an analysis of past energy demand patterns with support from local institutions, evaluate the effects of potential natural gas imports and electricity exchanges, and determine the market penetration of natural gas under various scenarios.

  13. Table 9. Summary of U.S. natural gas imports by point of entry, 2010-2014

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6 Table 9. Summary of U.S. natural gas imports by point of entry, 2010-2014 (volumes in million cubic feet, prices in dollars per thousand cubic feet) See footnotes at end of table. Pipeline (Canada) Eastport, ID 708,806 4.19 606,099 3.90 634,194 2.59 686,449 3.34 608,147 4.14 Calais, ME 131,035 4.94 149,736 4.40 76,540 3.44 55,248 4.86 79,590 9.70 Detroit, MI 79 8.37 19 5.17 0 -- 165 4.44 188 5.26 Marysville, MI 5,694 4.44 9,946 4.42 8,099 2.99 2,337 4.15 4,650 6.86 St. Clair, MI 5,591 4.97

  14. Table B1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, metric equivalents, 2010-2014

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8 Table B1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, metric equivalents, 2010-2014 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Wells Producing at End of Year 487,627 514,637 482,822 R 484,994 514,786 Production (million cubic meters) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells 375,127 348,044 354,080 R 304,676 294,045 From Oil Wells 165,220 167,294 140,617 R 153,044 167,695 From Coalbed Wells 54,277 50,377 43,591 R 40,374 36,392 From Shale Gas Wells 164,723 240,721 298,257 R 337,891 389,474

  15. Summary. “Materials Challenges in Nuclear Energy,” S.J. Zinkle, 2013

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pestovich, Kimberly Shay

    2015-11-05

    Nuclear energy continues to grow in abundance and importance. It offers a future electric grid based entirely off of green energy, and it has numerous applications. Nuclear power has capabilities to desalinate water, deliver process heat or steam, affordably crack hydrogen from water, and extract unconventional fossil fuel sources. Current light water reactors demonstrate high reliability under normal operating conditions. Researchers have shown significant interest and investigating how to extend reactor lifespans and into other possible reactor designs. Further understanding of mechanisms responsible for corrosion and stress corrosion cracking, radiation hardening and degradation, and nuclear fuels innovations can lead to safer, more reliable, and cost-effective water-cooled nuclear reactors for electricity production.

  16. Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors Utility Requirements Document Small Modular Reactors Inclusion Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Loflin, Leonard; McRimmon, Beth

    2014-12-18

    This report summarizes a project by EPRI to include requirements for small modular light water reactors (smLWR) into the EPRI Utility Requirements Document (URD) for Advanced Light Water Reactors. The project was jointly funded by EPRI and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The report covers the scope and content of the URD, the process used to revise the URD to include smLWR requirements, a summary of the major changes to the URD to include smLWR, and how to use the URD as revised to achieve value on new plant projects.

  17. Summary report on transportation of nuclear fuel materials in Japan : transportation infrastructure, threats identified in open literature, and physical protection regulations.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cochran, John Russell; Ouchi, Yuichiro (Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Japan); Furaus, James Phillip; Marincel, Michelle K.

    2008-03-01

    This report summarizes the results of three detailed studies of the physical protection systems for the protection of nuclear materials transport in Japan, with an emphasis on the transportation of mixed oxide fuel materials1. The Japanese infrastructure for transporting nuclear fuel materials is addressed in the first section. The second section of this report presents a summary of baseline data from the open literature on the threats of sabotage and theft during the transport of nuclear fuel materials in Japan. The third section summarizes a review of current International Atomic Energy Agency, Japanese and United States guidelines and regulations concerning the physical protection for the transportation of nuclear fuel materials.

  18. Nuclear containment steel liner corrosion workshop : final summary and recommendation report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Erler, Bryan A.; Weyers, Richard E.; Sagues, Alberto; Petti, Jason P.; Berke, Neal Steven; Naus, Dan J.

    2011-07-01

    This report documents the proceedings of an expert panel workshop conducted to evaluate the mechanisms of corrosion for the steel liner in nuclear containment buildings. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) sponsored this work which was conducted by Sandia National Laboratories. A workshop was conducted at the NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland on September 2 and 3, 2010. Due to the safety function performed by the liner, the expert panel was assembled in order to address the full range of issues that may contribute to liner corrosion. This report is focused on corrosion that initiates from the outer surface of the liner, the surface that is in contact with the concrete containment building wall. Liner corrosion initiating on the outer diameter (OD) surface has been identified at several nuclear power plants, always associated with foreign material left embedded in the concrete. The potential contributing factors to liner corrosion were broken into five areas for discussion during the workshop. Those include nuclear power plant design and operation, corrosion of steel in contact with concrete, concrete aging and degradation, concrete/steel non-destructive examination (NDE), and concrete repair and corrosion mitigation. This report also includes the expert panel member's recommendations for future research.

  19. Preparation for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Extension Conference in 1995. Workshop summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chrzanowski, P.L.

    1993-05-07

    About 30 specialists in non-proliferation participated in a workshop to explore ideas for US Government preparatory steps leading to the 1995 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Extension Conference. To that end, workshop sessions were devoted to reviewing the lessons learned from previous Review Conferences, discussing the threats to the non-proliferation regime together with ways of preserving and strengthening it, and examining the management of international nuclear commerce. A fundamental premise shared by workshop participants was that extension of the NPT is immensely important to international security. The importance of stemming proliferation and, more specifically, extending the Treaty, is growing as a result of the significant changes in the world. If the conferees of the Extension Conference decide on no extension or extension for a short limited duration, some technically advanced states that have foregone development of nuclear weapons may begin to rethink their options. Also, other arms control measures, such as the Chemical Weapons Convention, could start to unravel. The US must provide strong international leadership to ensure that the Extension Conference is a success, resulting in Treaty extension, perhaps through successive terms, into the indefinite future. Workshop participants were struck by the urgent need for the US to take organizational steps so that it is highly effective in its advance preparations for the Extension Conference. Moreover, the Extension Conference provides both a challenge and an opportunity to mold a cohesive set of US policy actions to define the future role of nuclear weapons and combat their proliferation.

  20. Umatilla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation; 1998-2002 Summary Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Contor, Craig R.

    2004-07-01

    The Umatilla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Project (WWNPME) was funded by Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) as directed by section 4(h) of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980 (P. L. 96-501). This project is in accordance with and pursuant to measures 4.2A, 4.3C.1, 7.1A.2, 7.1C.3, 7.1C.4 and 7.1D.2 of the Northwest Power Planning Council's (NPPC) Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (NPPC 1994). Work was conducted by the Fisheries Program of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) under the Umatilla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Project (UBNPME). Chapter One provides an overview of the entire report and shows how the objectives of each statement of work from 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 contract years are organized and reported. This chapter also provides background information relevant to the aquatic resources of the Umatilla River Basin. (Figure 1-1, Tables 1-1 and 1-2). Data and reports from this and previous efforts are available on the CTUIR website http://www.umatilla.nsn.us. This project was one of several subprojects of the Umatilla River Basin Fisheries Restoration Master Plan (CTUIR 1984, ODFW 1986) orchestrated to rehabilitate salmon and steelhead runs in the Umatilla River Basin. Subprojects in additions to this project include: Watershed Enhancement and Rehabilitation; Hatchery Construction and Operation; Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation; Satellite Facility Construction and Operations for Juvenile Acclimation and Adult Holding and Spawning; Fish Passage Construction and Operation; Juvenile and Adult Passage Facility Evaluations; Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Basin, and Flow Augmentation to Increase Stream Flows below Irrigation Diversions.

  1. Summary Report of the INL-JISEA Workshop on Nuclear Hybrud Energy Systems

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mark Antkowiak; Richard Boardman; Shannon Bragg-Sitton; Robert Cherry; Mark Ruth

    2012-07-01

    Hybrid energy systems utilize two or more energy resources as inputs to two or more physically coupled subsystems to produce one or more energy commodities as outputs. Nuclear hybrid energy systems can be used to provide load-following electrical power to match diurnal to seasonal-scale changes in power demand or to compensate for the variability of renewable wind or solar generation. To maintain economical, full rate operation of the nuclear reactor, its thermal energy available when power demand is low could be diverted into making synthetic vehicle fuels of various types. The Institute for Nuclear Energy Science and Technology (INEST) and the Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) co-sponsored an international workshop to identify research topics important in advancing the potential use of hybrid systems with a specific focus on nuclear-renewable hybrid systems. The workshop included presentations ranging from energy challenges and research and development (R&D) directions being pursued by nations to multiple options for hybrid systems. Those options include one that is being commercialized to other opportunities and analysis results quantifying them. The workshop also involved two breakout sessions - one focused on thermal energy management issues especially at unit-operation scale and the second focused on system operations issues including system controls, regulatory issues, technical and economic analysis, and market challenges. A discussion involving the full group focused on more general issues such as societal involvement and participation. Key criteria for selecting hybrid energy system projects and metrics for comparing them were also identified by the full group. The workshop's findings are being used initially by INEST to define topics for a research preproposal solicitation.

  2. High Temperature Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy TechnologySummary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    J. E. O'Brien; C. M. Stoots; J. S. Herring; M. G. McKellar; E. A. Harvego; M. S. Sohal; K. G. Condie

    2010-02-01

    The Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, has requested that a Hydrogen Technology Down-Selection be performed to identify the hydrogen production technology that has the best potential for timely commercial demonstration and for ultimate deployment with the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP). An Independent Review Team has been assembled to execute the down-selection. This report has been prepared to provide the members of the Independent Review Team with detailed background information on the High Temperature Electrolysis (HTE) process, hardware, and state of the art. The Idaho National Laboratory has been serving as the lead lab for HTE research and development under the Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative. The INL HTE program has included small-scale experiments, detailed computational modeling, system modeling, and technology demonstration. Aspects of all of these activities are included in this report. In terms of technology demonstration, the INL successfully completed a 1000-hour test of the HTE Integrated Laboratory Scale (ILS) technology demonstration experiment during the fall of 2008. The HTE ILS achieved a hydrogen production rate in excess of 5.7 Nm3/hr, with a power consumption of 18 kW. This hydrogen production rate is far larger than has been demonstrated by any of the thermochemical or hybrid processes to date.

  3. Nuclear Energy Knowledge and Validation Center (NEKVaC) Needs Workshop Summary Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gougar, Hans

    2015-02-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) has made significant progress developing simulation tools to predict the behavior of nuclear systems with greater accuracy and of increasing our capability to predict the behavior of these systems outside of the standard range of applications. These analytical tools require a more complex array of validation tests to accurately simulate the physics and multiple length and time scales. Results from modern simulations will allow experiment designers to narrow the range of conditions needed to bound system behavior and to optimize the deployment of instrumentation to limit the breadth and cost of the campaign. Modern validation, verification and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ) techniques enable analysts to extract information from experiments in a systematic manner and provide the users with a quantified uncertainty estimate. Unfortunately, the capability to perform experiments that would enable taking full advantage of the formalisms of these modern codes has progressed relatively little (with some notable exceptions in fuels and thermal-hydraulics); the majority of the experimental data available today is the "historic" data accumulated over the last decades of nuclear systems R&D. A validated code-model is a tool for users. An unvalidated code-model is useful for code developers to gain understanding, publish research results, attract funding, etc. As nuclear analysis codes have become more sophisticated, so have the measurement and validation methods and the challenges that confront them. A successful yet cost-effective validation effort requires expertise possessed only by a few, resources possessed only by the well-capitalized (or a willing collective), and a clear, well-defined objective (validating a code that is developed to satisfy the need(s) of an actual user). To that end, the Idaho National Laboratory established the Nuclear Energy Knowledge and Validation Center to address the challenges of modern code validation and to manage the knowledge from past, current, and future experimental campaigns. By pulling together the best minds involved in code development, experiment design, and validation to establish and disseminate best practices and new techniques, the Nuclear Energy Knowledge and Validation Center (NEKVaC or the Center) will be a resource for industry, DOE Programs, and academia validation efforts.

  4. Nature of Transactions (TI) Code | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nature of Transactions (TI) Code* Code: Description: A Initiates lease and financial responsibility of DOE-owned material B Transfer of lease and financial responsiblity of ...

  5. Summary Report of the INL-JISEA Workshop on Nuclear Hybrid Energy Systems

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Antkowiak, M.; Ruth, M.; Boardman, R.; Bragg-Sitton, S.; Cherry, R.; Shunn, L.

    2012-07-01

    The Institute for Nuclear Energy Science and Technology (INEST) and the Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) co-sponsored an international workshop to identify research topics important in advancing the potential use of hybrid systems with a specific focus on nuclear-renewable hybrid systems. The workshop included presentations ranging from energy challenges and research and development directions being pursued by nations to multiple options for hybrid systems. Those options include one that is being commercialized to other opportunities and analysis results quantifying them. The workshop also involved two breakout sessions--one focused on thermal energy management issues especially at unit-operation scale and the second focused on system operations issues including system controls, regulatory issues, technical and economic analysis, and market challenges. A discussion involving the full group focused on more general issues such as societal involvement and participation. Key criteria for selecting hybrid energy system projects and metrics for comparing them were also identified by the full group.

  6. Table 11. Summary of U.S. natural gas exports by point of exit, 2010-2014

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    1 Table 11. Summary of U.S. natural gas exports by point of exit, 2010-2014 (volumes in million cubic feet, prices in dollars per thousand cubic feet) See footnotes at end of table. Pipeline (Canada) Eastport, ID 12 5.85 10 4.74 0 -- 6 3.27 0 -- Calais, ME 452 4.53 1,028 4.46 6,952 4.30 13,425 8.45 2,694 6.22 Detroit, MI 44,275 4.69 43,690 4.26 50,347 3.10 50,439 4.04 46,981 5.36 Marysville, MI 22,198 4.87 41,964 4.48 42,866 3.18 35,273 3.98 24,583 5.45 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 4,011 5.27 9,555 4.23

  7. Nature of Coulomb Shifts of Nuclear Scattering Resonances

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Takibayev, N.Zh.

    2005-07-01

    Relations determining the shift of energies and widths of scattering resonances are obtained within the method of evolution in the coupling constant. These relations generalize the well-known relations for the shift of levels in a discrete spectrum. The problem of determining the Coulomb shifts of low-energy resonances manifesting themselves in the cross section for the scattering of some light nuclei is solved. Examples that are of importance for nuclear astrophysics and examples of problems that are associated with the production of chemical elements are considered. The character of Coulomb shifts is studied within simple nuclear models. Respective numerical estimates are given, which agree satisfactorily with experimental data.

  8. Natural Gas Imports (Summary)

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    10 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 View History U.S. 3,740,757 3,468,693 3,137,789 2,883,355 2,695,378 2,718,239 1973-2015 California 22,503 2,171 0 23 0 2007-2014 Georgia 106,454 75,641 59,266 15,575 7,155 1999-2014 Idaho 708,806 606,099 634,194 686,449 608,147 1982-2014 Louisiana 90,867 60,554 20,132 5,750 5,880 1982-2014 Maine 131,035 149,736 76,540 55,248 79,892 1982-2014 Maryland 43,431 13,981 2,790 5,366 11,585 1999-2014 Massachusetts 164,984 135,278 86,609 63,987 28,825 1982-2014 Michigan 11,365

  9. Natural Gas Processed (Summary)

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 View History U.S. 15,904,517 16,267,757 16,566,883 17,538,026 17,884,427 19,754,802 1967-2014 Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico 1,317,031 1,002,608 1,000,964 2012-2014 Alabama 248,232 242,444 230,546 87,269 89,258 80,590 1969-2014 Alaska 2,830,034 2,731,803 2,721,396 2,788,997 2,811,384 2,735,783 1969-2014 Arkansas

  10. Minnesota Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Imports 4.49 4.15 2.87 3.87 5.60 1989-2014 Exports -- 3.90 3.46 3.83 11.05 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.48 5.04 4.26 4.58 6.56 4.40 1984-2015 Residential 8.76 8.85 7.99 8.19 9.89 8.84 1967-2015 Commercial 7.60 7.46 6.36 6.86 8.66 7.30 1967-2015 Industrial 5.58 5.55 4.28 4.94 6.57 4.95 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 16.49 10.55 10.56 1993-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 451,405 548,686 406,327 243,805 328,610

  11. Mississippi Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    4.17 1967-2010 Imports -- 12.93 -- -- -- 2007-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.73 5.29 3.97 4.44 5.29 NA 1984-2015 Residential 10.19 9.47 9.60 9.00 9.49 9.71 1967-2015 Commercial 8.75 7.99 7.37 7.61 8.36 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 6.19 5.83 4.85 5.82 6.15 4.69 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 853 860 607 595 558 1977-2014 Adjustments 1 109 65 29 -15 1977-2014

  12. Missouri Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    1967-1997 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.17 5.85 5.27 4.99 5.76 4.65 1984-2015 Residential 11.66 12.02 12.25 10.88 10.83 11.59 1967-2015 Commercial 10.28 9.99 9.54 9.00 8.96 9.10 1967-2015 Industrial 8.70 8.54 7.85 8.19 8.00 7.75 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 6.34 6.11 5.64 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 0 53 100 26 28 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA 9 9 1967-2014 From Gas Wells NA NA NA 8 8

  13. Montana Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    3.64 1967-2010 Imports 4.13 3.75 2.45 3.23 4.39 1989-2014 Exports 4.05 3.82 2.40 3.43 5.38 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.17 5.11 4.23 4.21 5.03 3.71 1984-2015 Residential 8.64 8.80 8.05 8.19 9.11 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 8.54 8.66 7.98 8.09 8.77 7.82 1967-2015 Industrial 8.07 8.13 7.54 7.33 7.99 6.45 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 9.60 8.20 6.48 1990-2012 Electric Power W W W -- W -- 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 944 778 602

  14. Nebraska Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    8 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.62 5.11 4.31 4.61 5.58 NA 1984-2015 Residential 8.95 8.84 8.68 8.39 8.77 8.94 1967-2015 Commercial 7.08 6.69 6.19 6.49 7.27 6.54 1967-2015 Industrial 5.85 5.61 4.34 4.72 5.69 4.61 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 15.10 15.29 1994-2012 Electric Power W 5.74 3.93 4.96 5.84 3.97 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 276 322 270 357 310 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 2,255 1,980 1,328 1,032 402 1967-2014 From Gas

  15. Nevada Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    NA 2006-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.19 6.77 5.13 5.16 5.90 4.06 1984-2015 Residential 12.25 10.66 10.14 9.42 11.44 11.82 1967-2015 Commercial 9.77 8.07 7.43 6.61 8.21 8.66 1967-2015 Industrial 10.53 8.99 7.34 6.66 7.83 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 8.13 4.76 8.97 1991-2012 Electric Power 5.75 5.00 3.49 W W 3.34 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 0 0 0 4 4 1996-2014 Gross Withdrawals 4 3 4 3 3 1991-2014 From Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 3

  16. Colorado Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    3.96 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.26 4.94 4.26 4.76 5.42 3.96 1984-2015 Residential 8.13 8.25 8.28 7.85 8.89 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 7.58 7.84 7.58 7.26 8.15 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 5.84 6.42 5.79 5.90 6.84 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 10.79 9.56 11.65 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.16 4.98 W 4.91 5.49 3.81 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 24,119 24,821 20,666 22,381 20,851 1977-2014 Adjustments 449 801 -363 -272 627

  17. Florida Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Wellhead NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.49 5.07 3.93 4.44 5.05 NA 1984-2015 Residential 17.89 18.16 18.34 18.46 19.02 19.29 1967-2015 Commercial 10.60 11.14 10.41 10.87 11.38 10.74 1967-2015 Industrial 8.33 8.07 6.96 6.77 6.89 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 17.98 5.56 9.83 1989-2012 Electric Power 6.54 5.86 4.80 5.08 5.58 4.41 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 56 6 16 15 0 1977-2014 Adjustments 64 -54 -2 1 -2 1977-2014

  18. Georgia Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Imports 4.39 4.20 2.78 3.36 4.33 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.93 5.19 4.35 4.66 5.19 3.82 1984-2015 Residential 15.17 15.72 16.23 14.60 14.45 15.06 1967-2015 Commercial 10.95 10.51 9.75 9.38 9.86 8.49 1967-2015 Industrial 6.25 5.90 4.61 5.38 6.07 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.17 5.57 14.51 1993-2012 Electric Power 5.21 4.72 3.40 4.45 4.98 3.27 1997-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 106,454 75,641 59,266 15,575 7,155 1999-2014 Underground Storage

  19. Hawaii Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Citygate 22.94 31.58 32.39 28.45 26.94 18.11 1984-2015 Residential 44.50 55.28 52.86 49.13 47.51 40.00 1980-2015 Commercial 36.55 45.58 47.03 41.92 40.42 31.17 1980-2015 Industrial 24.10 29.80 30.89 27.56 26.75 18.81 1997-2015 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 2,627 2,619 2,689 2,855 2,928 1997-2014 Pipeline & Distribution Use 2 2 3 1 1 2004-2014 Delivered to Consumers 2,625 2,616 2,687 2,853 2,927 2,929 1997-2015 Residential 509

  20. Idaho Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Imports 4.19 3.90 2.59 3.34 4.14 1989-2014 Exports 5.85 4.74 -- 3.27 -- 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 4.82 4.65 4.07 3.93 4.29 NA 1984-2015 Residential 8.95 8.80 8.26 8.12 8.54 8.62 1967-2015 Commercial 8.21 8.09 7.35 7.29 7.70 7.61 1967-2015 Industrial 6.39 6.36 5.73 5.47 5.96 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 7.51 5.10 9.27 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W W W 2.89 2001-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 708,806 606,099 634,194 686,449 608,147 1982-2014

  1. Indiana Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    13 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.52 4.97 4.23 4.38 5.63 NA 1984-2015 Residential 8.63 9.46 8.94 8.43 9.02 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 7.55 8.04 7.69 7.59 8.19 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 5.65 6.53 6.19 6.54 7.45 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.19 13.24 12.29 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.91 W W W W W 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 620 914 819 921 895 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 6,802 9,075 8,814 7,938 6,616 1967-2014 From Gas Wells 6,802

  2. Kansas Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    23 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.08 5.53 4.74 4.98 6.10 NA 1984-2015 Residential 10.61 9.93 10.12 10.19 10.59 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 9.65 8.89 8.82 9.07 9.53 8.83 1967-2015 Industrial 5.49 5.28 3.87 4.86 5.70 4.37 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- 9.87 9.00 1994-2012 Electric Power 5.05 4.79 3.28 4.57 5.65 3.95 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 3,673 3,486 3,308 3,592 4,359 1977-2014 Adjustments 140 125 -236 -20 94 1977-2014

  3. Kentucky Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    47 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.69 5.18 4.17 4.47 5.16 NA 1984-2015 Residential 10.02 10.44 10.19 9.80 10.62 10.94 1967-2015 Commercial 8.61 8.79 8.28 8.32 9.04 8.80 1967-2015 Industrial 5.57 5.16 3.96 4.84 5.80 4.36 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1992-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 2,613 2,006 1,408 1,663 1,611 1977-2014 Adjustments -58 -34 -282 103 -9 1977-2014 Revision Increases

  4. Louisiana Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    23 1967-2010 Imports 4.84 7.57 7.98 14.40 14.59 1989-2014 Exports 7.07 9.63 11.80 -- -- 2007-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.43 5.67 3.48 4.12 4.90 3.32 1984-2015 Residential 11.73 11.37 11.54 10.80 10.89 10.71 1967-2015 Commercial 9.88 9.36 8.44 8.59 9.01 7.93 1967-2015 Industrial 4.68 4.25 2.96 3.86 4.68 2.90 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 11.14 10.58 10.53 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.79 W 2.99 3.95 4.74 W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of

  5. Maine Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Imports 4.94 4.40 3.45 4.86 9.71 1999-2014 Exports 4.53 4.46 4.30 8.43 6.68 2007-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.19 8.14 7.73 7.35 10.33 NA 1984-2015 Residential 14.14 14.20 15.94 15.21 16.90 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 11.71 11.69 12.22 12.79 15.13 14.40 1967-2015 Industrial 11.23 10.89 10.35 10.32 11.93 NA 1997-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2001-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 131,035 149,736 76,540 55,248 79,892 1982-2014 Exports 452 1,028 6,952

  6. Maryland Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Wellhead NA 1967-2010 Imports 5.37 5.30 13.82 15.29 8.34 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.49 6.26 5.67 5.37 6.36 4.99 1984-2015 Residential 12.44 12.10 12.17 11.67 12.21 12.05 1967-2015 Commercial 9.87 10.29 10.00 10.06 10.52 10.00 1967-2015 Industrial 9.05 8.61 8.01 8.47 9.94 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.99 5.09 -- 1993-2012 Electric Power 5.77 5.44 W W 5.35 4.06 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 7 8 9 7 7 1989-2014 Gross

  7. Massachusetts Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Imports 4.86 4.77 3.69 5.49 8.00 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.74 7.04 6.03 6.20 6.96 NA 1984-2015 Residential 14.53 13.81 13.22 13.49 14.50 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 12.00 11.68 10.68 11.25 12.48 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 10.41 10.14 9.82 10.15 11.53 9.34 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 12.48 4.28 14.63 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.44 5.07 3.68 5.96 6.66 4.38 1997-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 164,984 135,278 86,609 63,987 28,825 1982-2014 Underground

  8. Michigan Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Wellhead 3.79 1967-2010 Imports 4.73 4.38 2.88 4.02 8.34 1989-2014 Exports 4.85 4.44 3.12 4.07 6.26 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.07 6.18 5.50 4.91 5.54 4.22 1984-2015 Residential 11.32 10.47 9.95 9.09 9.33 8.78 1967-2015 Commercial 8.95 9.14 8.35 7.82 8.28 7.49 1967-2015 Industrial 9.25 8.27 7.38 6.97 7.84 6.59 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.97 4.76 3.21 4.58 6.78 3.21 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves

  9. Alabama Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    4.46 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.46 5.80 5.18 4.65 4.93 NA 1984-2015 Residential 15.79 15.08 16.20 15.47 14.59 13.95 1967-2015 Commercial 13.34 12.36 12.56 12.35 11.92 11.03 1967-2015 Industrial 6.64 5.57 4.35 4.98 5.49 3.94 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 16.24 11.45 17.99 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.85 W 3.09 4.14 4.74 3.06 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 2,629 2,475 2,228 1,597 2,036 1977-2014 Adjustments 32 -49 112 -274

  10. Alaska Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    3.17 1967-2010 Exports 12.19 12.88 15.71 -- 15.74 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1970-2005 Citygate 6.67 6.53 6.14 6.02 6.34 6.57 1988-2015 Residential 8.89 8.77 8.47 8.85 9.11 9.68 1967-2015 Commercial 8.78 8.09 8.09 8.34 8.30 7.80 1967-2015 Industrial 4.23 3.84 5.11 8.16 7.97 7.21 1997-2015 Electric Power W 5.04 4.32 4.73 5.06 5.40 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 8,838 9,424 9,579 7,316 6,745 1977-2014 Adjustments 1 -1 -2 -5 -21 1977-2014

  11. Arizona Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    11 1967-2010 Exports 4.57 4.28 3.07 4.17 5.15 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.59 5.91 4.68 4.73 5.20 NA 1984-2015 Residential 15.87 15.04 15.75 13.92 17.20 17.04 1967-2015 Commercial 10.72 9.99 9.35 8.76 10.34 10.53 1967-2015 Industrial 7.54 6.86 5.78 6.29 7.52 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 12.35 7.73 13.19 1991-2012 Electric Power 4.84 W 3.51 4.60 5.30 3.43 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 5 5 5 5 5 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 183

  12. Arkansas Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    3.84 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.76 6.27 5.36 4.99 5.84 4.76 1984-2015 Residential 11.53 11.46 11.82 10.46 10.39 11.20 1967-2015 Commercial 8.89 8.90 7.99 7.68 7.88 8.08 1967-2015 Industrial 7.28 7.44 6.38 6.74 6.99 6.97 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- 9.04 1994-2012 Electric Power 5.11 W 3.19 4.32 W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 14,178 16,370 11,035 13,518 12,789 1977-2014 Adjustments -34 728 -743 -78 -3 1977-2014

  13. California Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    87 1967-2010 Imports 4.76 3.57 -- 3.59 -- 2007-2014 Exports 4.51 4.18 2.90 3.89 4.56 1997-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 4.86 4.47 3.46 4.18 4.88 3.27 1984-2015 Residential 9.92 9.93 9.14 9.92 11.51 11.38 1967-2015 Commercial 8.30 8.29 7.05 7.81 9.05 7.98 1967-2015 Industrial 7.02 7.04 5.77 6.57 7.65 6.35 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.55 7.32 7.01 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.99 4.71 3.68 4.53 5.23 3.39 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of

  14. Arizona Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.55 4.53 4.48 4.25 4.42 NA 1989-2015 Residential 23.59 24.01 23.01 20.77 14.57 12.75 1989-2015 Commercial 10.67 10.52 10.40 10.14 9.36 9.17 1989-2015 Industrial 6.80 NA 6.62 6.36 6.35 6.43 2001-2015 Electric Power 3.54 3.47 W W W W 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA

  15. California Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3.56 3.55 3.42 3.32 3.08 3.02 1989-2015 Residential 11.68 11.85 11.91 11.53 10.31 11.37 1989-2015 Commercial 7.68 7.87 7.84 7.69 7.20 8.23 1989-2015 Industrial 6.02 6.07 6.09 5.88 5.77 6.92 2001-2015 Electric Power 3.53 3.52 3.29 3.18 2.94 2.95 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 19,225 19,655 18,928 18,868 18,266 18,868 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From

  16. Connecticut Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.58 4.45 4.59 3.58 3.36 3.80 1989-2015 Residential 18.22 19.33 NA 15.30 12.50 11.82 1989-2015 Commercial 9.29 9.52 NA 9.53 8.48 8.18 1989-2015 Industrial 5.88 5.66 6.59 5.76 5.87 6.60 2001-2015 Electric Power 2.48 2.69 3.08 3.17 5.14 5.06 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 16,880 17,528 15,795 17,525 19,928 23,268 2001-2015 Residential 1,120 997 975 2,158 3,952 4,884 1989-2015 Commercial 2,379 2,512 2,577 3,155 4,122 5,038 1989-2015 Industrial 1,758 1,826 1,734

  17. Delaware Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10.56 10.03 10.35 6.54 5.14 4.98 1989-2015 Residential 21.80 23.75 23.22 NA 14.03 11.09 1989-2015 Commercial 13.35 13.86 13.93 12.54 10.82 9.15 1989-2015 Industrial 8.82 11.38 11.40 11.15 9.62 8.32 2001-2015 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- -- 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 8,917 8,330 7,939 6,849 6,797 7,386 2001-2015 Residential 163 166 157 378 720 978 1989-2015 Commercial 375 409 432 812 1,065 1,177 1989-2015 Industrial 2,669 2,636 2,448 2,590 2,682 3,040

  18. Florida Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    87 4.44 4.53 4.17 3.92 4.65 1989-2015 Residential 24.58 24.59 24.41 23.37 21.56 19.15 1989-2015 Commercial 10.92 10.91 11.15 10.61 10.69 10.89 1989-2015 Industrial 6.69 6.02 6.08 6.29 6.20 NA 2001-2015 Electric Power 4.43 4.45 4.46 4.31 3.90 3.98 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA

  19. Georgia Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    16 4.16 4.14 3.80 3.37 3.51 1989-2015 Residential 25.45 24.78 25.75 20.43 15.20 14.41 1989-2015 Commercial 9.08 9.07 9.38 8.65 9.72 7.80 1989-2015 Industrial 4.06 4.25 4.15 4.02 3.65 3.74 2001-2015 Electric Power 3.40 3.36 3.31 2.85 2.64 W 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 58,820 54,742 49,172 52,445 55,858 56,505 2001-2015 Residential 3,662 3,731 3,794 5,873 10,248 11,943 1989-2015 Commercial 2,164 2,274 2,417 3,159 4,695 5,185 1989-2015 Industrial 12,955 12,710

  20. Hawaii Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    22.97 17.72 15.38 14.59 14.92 14.81 1989-2015 Residential 45.12 37.43 36.33 37.38 38.46 38.20 1989-2015 Commercial 36.02 30.45 28.60 27.06 28.13 28.72 1989-2015 Industrial 21.32 19.06 18.87 17.77 17.47 14.88 2001-2015 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- -- 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 243 240 233 240 228 251 2001-2015 Residential 45 43 41 44 44 47 1989-2015 Commercial 159 156 153 152 148 167 1989-2015 Industrial 38 41 37 43 36 36 2001-2015 Vehicle Fuel 1 1 1 1 1 1

  1. Idaho Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    65 4.50 NA 3.75 3.52 3.34 1989-2015 Residential 10.72 10.96 9.56 8.93 7.74 7.89 1989-2015 Commercial 8.41 8.12 8.00 7.65 6.93 7.12 1989-2015 Industrial 6.09 6.08 5.93 5.77 NA 5.39 2001-2015 Electric Power 2.85 2.92 3.01 2.92 2.72 2.41 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 6,426 NA 6,838 NA NA 13,715 2001-2015 Residential 464 359 638 995 3,624 4,740 1989-2015 Commercial 625 583 694 1,066 2,068 2,719 1989-2015 Industrial 2,094 NA 2,564 NA NA 3,403 2001-2015 Vehicle Fuel

  2. Iowa Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    54 4.61 4.62 3.58 3.81 3.79 1989-2015 Residential 15.67 17.34 16.40 13.15 8.41 7.29 1989-2015 Commercial 8.45 8.95 8.14 5.99 6.39 5.72 1989-2015 Industrial 5.32 5.00 NA 4.46 5.14 4.50 2001-2015 Electric Power 3.06 3.12 2.98 2.89 5.06 2.60 2002-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Total Capacity 288,210 288,210 288,210 288,210 288,210 288,210 2002-2015 Gas in Storage 233,287 246,900 263,036 277,160 272,523 255,967 1990-2015 Base Gas 197,897 197,897 197,897 197,897 197,897 197,897

  3. Kansas Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5.39 NA NA 5.53 3.94 3.55 1989-2015 Residential 19.38 20.79 19.68 14.37 NA 7.81 1989-2015 Commercial 12.42 11.98 12.47 9.39 7.25 7.08 1989-2015 Industrial 4.12 4.07 4.02 4.31 4.76 5.79 2001-2015 Electric Power 3.52 3.70 3.68 4.88 4.03 4.66 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 24,842 24,864 23,819 23,559 22,371 22,744 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed

  4. Maine Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9.76 NA 5.52 4.38 7.52 8.01 1989-2015 Residential 20.79 22.87 21.79 NA 13.49 13.63 1989-2015 Commercial 12.17 12.29 11.47 8.63 10.48 11.30 1989-2015 Industrial 4.68 4.81 4.72 4.56 8.20 8.50 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers NA NA NA NA NA NA 2001-2015 Residential 46 45 46 136 232 298 1989-2015 Commercial 409 425 415 569 779 961 1989-2015 Industrial NA NA NA NA NA NA 2001-2015 Vehicle Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2015 Electric Power

  5. Massachusetts Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    0 7.15 7.59 4.62 4.42 5.42 1989-2015 Residential 13.26 13.78 13.23 NA 11.15 12.66 1989-2015 Commercial 8.94 9.00 8.52 NA 8.57 10.00 1989-2015 Industrial 6.64 7.08 6.34 5.59 7.41 9.02 2001-2015 Electric Power 2.57 3.08 4.14 4.31 3.62 2.53 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 31,404 31,673 25,692 29,699 31,148 36,395 2001-2015 Residential 2,619 2,442 2,465 5,784 9,387 12,553 1989-2015 Commercial 3,912 3,873 4,066 7,399 9,210 10,044 1989-2015 Industrial 2,219 2,286

  6. Michigan Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3.82 3.82 3.60 3.65 3.81 3.95 1989-2015 Residential 13.65 13.52 13.21 8.93 7.84 7.55 1989-2015 Commercial 9.31 9.17 9.05 7.46 6.75 6.59 1989-2015 Industrial 6.44 6.86 6.66 6.33 5.70 5.77 2001-2015 Electric Power 3.30 3.40 3.32 2.91 2.56 2.17 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA

  7. Minnesota Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.68 4.52 4.49 3.51 4.06 3.65 1989-2015 Residential 13.30 13.01 12.75 9.33 7.71 7.16 1989-2015 Commercial 8.17 8.03 7.72 6.43 6.20 6.10 1989-2015 Industrial 4.59 4.76 4.23 4.31 4.20 4.31 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Total Capacity 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 2002-2015 Gas in Storage 6,153 6,355 6,573 6,835 6,984 6,973 1990-2015 Base Gas 4,848 4,848 4,848 4,848 4,848 4,848 1990-2015 Working Gas 1,305 1,507 1,725 1,987 2,136 2,125

  8. Mississippi Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    81 3.82 3.64 3.68 NA 4.29 1989-2015 Residential 14.87 15.82 15.39 13.96 12.13 9.71 1989-2015 Commercial 7.79 NA NA 7.81 7.98 8.06 1989-2015 Industrial 4.49 3.95 4.46 4.21 4.26 4.12 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2002-2015 Repressuring

  9. Montana Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    43 3.36 3.10 3.28 2.87 3.25 1989-2015 Residential 11.68 11.78 11.04 9.01 7.34 NA 1989-2015 Commercial 9.42 9.44 9.37 8.22 7.05 6.59 1989-2015 Industrial 6.33 5.86 6.91 5.79 6.09 5.47 2001-2015 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- -- 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 4,941 4,756 4,573 4,827 4,568 4,681 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA

  10. Vermont Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6.39 6.34 5.96 4.59 5.08 5.93 1989-2015 Residential 21.69 23.04 23.16 18.41 14.89 13.84 1989-2015 Commercial 6.10 NA 6.97 6.20 6.65 7.37 1989-2015 Industrial 5.90 4.53 4.65 5.58 5.42 5.81 2001-2015 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- -- 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers NA 544 566 NA 1,024 1,168 2001-2015 Residential 87 73 79 164 288 393 1989-2015 Commercial NA 318 336 522 557 586 1989-2015 Industrial NA 153 150 NA 178 188 2001-2015 Vehicle Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2015

  11. Washington Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    29 5.84 5.08 4.25 3.51 3.46 1989-2015 Residential 12.37 12.57 11.71 11.24 9.71 9.15 1989-2015 Commercial 9.80 10.04 9.42 9.32 8.35 7.80 1989-2015 Industrial 9.45 8.94 8.87 8.48 7.87 7.27 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Total Capacity 46,900 46,900 46,900 46,900 46,900 46,900 2002-2015 Gas in Storage 37,248 41,994 45,053 45,877 42,090 39,380 1990-2015 Base Gas 22,300 22,300 22,300 22,300 22,300 22,300 1990-2015 Working Gas 14,948 19,694

  12. Wisconsin Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    68 5.95 5.61 4.25 4.21 3.96 1989-2015 Residential 13.27 14.05 12.80 8.42 7.89 7.38 1989-2015 Commercial 6.42 6.44 6.18 5.37 6.34 6.12 1989-2015 Industrial 4.54 4.91 4.56 4.69 5.37 5.43 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 25,107 23,388 23,582 29,272 38,845 49,528 2001-2015 Residential 2,475 2,308 2,498 6,080 11,070 16,428 1989-2015 Commercial 2,782 2,964 2,867 4,985 7,776 10,352 1989-2015 Industrial 8,824 9,124 9,103 10,742 12,289

  13. Alaska Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Gross Withdrawals 221,340 204,073 261,150 279,434 289,770 304,048 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Coalbed Wells ...

  14. Alabama Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  15. Louisiana Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Gross Withdrawals 159,456 166,570 164,270 166,973 161,280 163,799 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  16. Indiana Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  17. Ohio Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 88,406 87,904 89,371 104,127 104,572 113,096 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  18. Utah Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 35,984 33,029 30,933 31,404 30,891 34,204 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  19. Maryland Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  20. Arkansas Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 85,763 83,954 81,546 83,309 79,278 80,492 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  1. Nevada Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  2. Virginia Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  3. ,"Indiana Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...,"Production",10,"Monthly","122015","1151991" ,"Data 3","Underground ... 37817,111095,98938,79019,19919,3042,180,-2862 37848,111095,101835,79019,...

  4. Illinois Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  5. Colorado Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Gross Withdrawals 139,822 143,397 138,325 144,845 139,698 141,947 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  6. Kentucky Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  7. ,"Maryland Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...,"Production",10,"Monthly","122015","1151991" ,"Data 3","Underground ... 40283,11027,3761,4025,1991,17,1233 40313,9569,2493,3208,1909,17,1942 ...

  8. Texas Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Gross Withdrawals 752,341 754,086 731,049 739,603 714,788 720,593 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  9. Pennsylvania Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Gross Withdrawals 398,737 408,325 396,931 404,431 403,683 429,251 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  10. Wyoming Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Gross Withdrawals 168,548 167,539 162,880 167,555 163,345 165,658 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  11. Missouri Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  12. Tennessee Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  13. Nebraska Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.11 4.16 4.68 4.04 3.83 3.23 1989-2015 Residential 14.88 15.79 15.70 13.92 9.51 6.88 1989-2015 Commercial 6.03 6.25 6.43 5.91 5.67 5.34 1989-2015 Industrial 4.31 4.38 4.32 4.15 4.09 4.85 2001-2015 Electric Power 3.81 5.08 3.38 3.22 3.37 3.63 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA

  14. Oklahoma Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5.17 5.43 5.45 5.28 4.22 3.86 1989-2015 Residential 23.13 26.66 25.23 23.39 14.41 7.35 1989-2015 Commercial 13.62 15.18 14.85 14.21 10.78 6.14 1989-2015 Industrial NA 8.56 NA 9.67 7.72 6.04 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 217,883 213,529 204,298 209,342 200,704 206,487 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells

  15. Oregon Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6.30 5.84 5.19 5.15 3.92 3.72 1989-2015 Residential 16.60 17.52 14.81 13.88 10.10 NA 1989-2015 Commercial 10.76 11.12 10.13 10.18 8.39 9.09 1989-2015 Industrial 6.39 6.49 6.47 6.51 5.67 5.59 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2002-2015

  16. Illinois Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Wellhead NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.52 5.09 4.11 4.43 6.28 3.82 1984-2015 Residential 9.39 8.78 8.26 8.20 9.59 7.95 1967-2015 Commercial 8.76 8.27 7.78 7.57 8.86 7.26 1967-2015 Industrial 7.13 6.84 5.63 6.00 7.75 5.36 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 7.22 11.61 11.39 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.14 W W W W W 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 50 40 40 34 36 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 1,702

  17. Tennessee Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.35 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.78 5.23 4.35 4.73 5.37 4.06 1984-2015 Residential 10.46 10.21 9.95 9.44 10.13 9.69 1967-2015 Commercial 9.39 9.04 8.36 8.41 9.30 8.46 1967-2015 Industrial 6.64 6.15 4.98 5.62 6.31 4.89 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 8.16 12.32 8.18 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.04 4.62 2.90 3.83 4.64 2.74 2001-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 230 210 212 1,089 1,024 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 5,144 4,851 5,825 5,400 5,294

  18. Texas Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    70 1967-2010 Imports 6.72 6.78 10.09 12.94 11.79 1993-2014 Exports 4.68 4.44 3.14 3.94 4.67 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.89 5.39 4.30 4.89 5.77 4.20 1984-2015 Residential 10.82 10.21 10.55 10.50 11.16 10.65 1967-2015 Commercial 7.90 7.07 6.63 7.25 8.26 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 4.61 4.21 3.02 3.92 4.71 2.90 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.38 7.03 10.14 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.66 4.36 2.99 3.94 4.62 2.88 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves

  19. Ohio Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.87 5.51 4.47 4.51 4.91 4.49 1984-2015 Residential 11.13 10.78 9.91 9.46 10.16 9.49 1967-2015 Commercial 9.25 8.55 7.11 6.21 7.82 6.62 1967-2015 Industrial 7.40 6.77 5.48 6.03 7.06 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.01 W 3.05 3.95 4.31 2.42 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 832 758 1,233 3,161 6,723 1977-2014 Adjustments 127 -99 -41 -328 -426 1977-2014 Revision

  20. Oklahoma Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    71 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.18 5.67 5.00 4.75 5.35 4.59 1984-2015 Residential 11.12 10.32 11.10 9.71 10.10 10.26 1967-2015 Commercial 9.77 8.94 8.95 8.05 8.26 8.22 1967-2015 Industrial 8.23 7.37 7.65 7.16 8.27 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 8.18 10.98 9.13 1991-2012 Electric Power 4.84 W 3.04 4.13 W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 26,345 27,830 26,599 26,873 31,778 1977-2014 Adjustments -394 -368 -686 -622 816

  1. Oregon Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    92 1979-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.78 5.84 5.21 4.82 5.40 4.65 1984-2015 Residential 12.49 11.76 11.22 10.84 11.72 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 10.10 9.60 8.91 8.60 9.44 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 7.05 6.84 5.87 5.79 6.20 6.38 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.61 4.23 4.57 1992-2012 Electric Power 4.57 W W W W W 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 26 24 27 26 28 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 1,407 1,344 770 770 950 1979-2014 From Gas Wells 1,407

  2. Pennsylvania Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.04 6.28 5.52 5.26 5.59 NA 1984-2015 Residential 12.90 12.46 11.99 11.63 11.77 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 10.47 10.42 10.24 10.11 10.13 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 8.23 9.86 9.58 9.13 9.95 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 3.76 3.40 7.96 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.27 4.85 3.15 4.17 5.04 2.52 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 13,960 26,529 36,348 49,674 59,873 1977-2014 Adjustments -373 -224 -240 664

  3. Wyoming Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.30 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.04 4.65 4.03 4.51 5.27 4.36 1984-2015 Residential 8.58 8.72 8.42 8.27 9.34 9.19 1967-2015 Commercial 7.13 7.29 6.72 6.81 7.69 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 4.91 5.57 4.87 4.62 5.89 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 10.08 11.96 14.15 1991-2012 Electric Power W W W W W 5.18 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 35,074 35,290 30,094 33,618 27,553 1977-2014 Adjustments 521 -209 692 2,058 -1,877 1977-2014

  4. Utah Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    23 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.53 5.68 5.50 5.70 5.74 5.70 1984-2015 Residential 8.22 8.44 8.70 8.55 9.48 9.72 1967-2015 Commercial 6.83 7.05 7.00 7.13 7.71 7.97 1967-2015 Industrial 5.57 5.50 4.69 5.22 5.83 5.89 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 11.61 13.01 15.02 1990-2012 Electric Power W W 3.04 4.10 W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 6,981 7,857 7,548 6,829 6,685 1977-2014 Adjustments -80 134 289 -582 -20 1977-2014 Revision

  5. Vermont Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6.54 5.81 4.90 5.72 6.61 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1982-2005 Citygate 8.29 7.98 6.63 6.16 7.08 NA 1984-2015 Residential 16.14 16.17 16.73 15.87 14.68 14.56 1980-2015 Commercial 11.82 11.90 12.09 7.57 9.13 NA 1980-2015 Industrial 6.57 6.09 4.89 8.59 6.63 5.50 1997-2015 Electric Power 5.73 5.26 4.14 -- W -- 1997-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 8,895 10,319 8,247 10,324 10,621 1982-2014 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 8,443 8,611 8,191 9,602

  6. Virginia Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.88 6.64 5.64 5.54 5.98 NA 1984-2015 Residential 12.73 12.72 12.42 11.68 12.07 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 9.55 9.69 8.77 8.83 9.17 8.11 1967-2015 Industrial 6.68 6.44 5.29 6.02 6.43 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 4.31 4.55 15.16 1993-2012 Electric Power 5.72 W 3.38 4.29 6.12 3.55 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 3,215 2,832 2,579 2,373 2,800 1982-2014 Adjustments 59 -413 66 -9 89 1982-2014

  7. Washington Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.22 3.96 2.72 3.62 4.32 1989-2014 Exports 4.81 4.47 3.87 4.02 5.05 1998-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.29 5.55 4.48 4.89 5.82 4.42 1984-2015 Residential 12.24 12.30 11.87 11.37 10.59 10.61 1967-2015 Commercial 10.49 10.40 9.82 9.21 9.03 9.14 1967-2015 Industrial 9.37 9.47 8.77 8.37 8.55 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 12.89 9.88 11.06 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.52 W W W W W 1998-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 332,358 313,922 312,236 333,050 359,348

  8. ,"Alaska Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...2015","1152013" ,"Data 4","Consumption",6,"Monthly","122015","1151989" ,"Release Date:","2292016" ,"Next Release Date:","3312016" ,"Excel File ...

  9. ,"Michigan Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...5,987563,399102,588461,53249,995,-52254 39005,1021583,998690,399102,599588,20602,9459,-11144 39036,1021583,991977,399102,592875,11217,17912,6694 39066,1021583,942457,396874,545584,...

  10. ,"Wyoming Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ... 37695,159737,143763,15974,,0,10880,13536,1965,133356 37726,151054,135949,15105,,0,11144,12903,1639,125368 37756,143494,129144,14349,,0,10300,5571,1461,126161 ...

  11. Understanding the nature of nuclear power plant risk

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Denning, R. S.

    2012-07-01

    This paper describes the evolution of understanding of severe accident consequences from the non-mechanistic assumptions of WASH-740 to WASH-1400, NUREG-1150, SOARCA and today in the interpretation of the consequences of the accident at Fukushima. As opposed to the general perception, the radiological human health consequences to members of the Japanese public from the Fukushima accident will be small despite meltdowns at three reactors and loss of containment integrity. In contrast, the radiation-related societal impacts present a substantial additional economic burden on top of the monumental task of economic recovery from the nonnuclear aspects of the earthquake and tsunami damage. The Fukushima accident provides additional evidence that we have mis-characterized the risk of nuclear power plant accidents to ourselves and to the public. The human health risks are extremely small even to people living next door to a nuclear power plant. The principal risk associated with a nuclear power plant accident involves societal impacts: relocation of people, loss of land use, loss of contaminated products, decontamination costs and the need for replacement power. Although two of the three probabilistic safety goals of the NRC address societal risk, the associated quantitative health objectives in reality only address individual human health risk. This paper describes the types of analysis that would address compliance with the societal goals. (authors)

  12. Co-ordination of the International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators; Summary Report of an IAEA Technical Meeting

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Abriola, D.; Tuli, J.

    2009-03-23

    The IAEA Nuclear Data Section convened the 18th meeting of the International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators at the IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 23 to 27 March 2009. This meeting was attended by 22 scientists from 14 Member States, plus IAEA staff, concerned with the compilation, evaluation and dissemination of nuclear structure and decay data. A summary of the meeting, recommendations/conclusions, data centre reports, and various proposals considered, modified and agreed by the participants are contained within this document. The International Network of Nuclear Structure and Decay Data (NSDD) Evaluators holds biennial meetings under the auspices of the IAEA, and consists of evaluation groups and data service centres in several countries. This network has the objective of providing up-to-date nuclear structure and decay data for all known nuclides by evaluating all existing experimental data. Data resulting from this international evaluation collaboration is included in the Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) and published in the journals Nuclear Physics A and Nuclear Data Sheets (NDS).

  13. Executive Summary: Executive Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Executive Summary United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad Field Office Carlsbad, New Mexico Compliance Recertification Application 2014 Executive Summary Table of Contents EXECSUM-1.0 Overview EXECSUM-1.1 Contents of the CRA-2014 EXECSUM-1.2 Programmatic Changes Since the CRA-2009 EXECSUM-1.3 PA Results EXECSUM-1.4 Summary of Changes to the Application List of Figures Figure EXECSUM- 1. CRA-2014 PA and CRA-2009 PABC Overall Mean CCDFs for Total Normalized Releases

  14. Hydrogen Resource Assessment: Hydrogen Potential from Coal, Natural Gas, Nuclear, and Hydro Power

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Milbrandt, A.; Mann, M.

    2009-02-01

    This paper estimates the quantity of hydrogen that could be produced from coal, natural gas, nuclear, and hydro power by county in the United States. The study estimates that more than 72 million tonnes of hydrogen can be produced from coal, natural gas, nuclear, and hydro power per year in the country (considering only 30% of their total annual production). The United States consumed about 396 million tonnes of gasoline in 2007; therefore, the report suggests the amount of hydrogen from these sources could displace about 80% of this consumption.

  15. Final Meeting Summary Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE October 9, 2012 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Opening ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) Injury Assessment Plan ................................................... 3 100 Area Schedule for Documents/Decisions

  16. Technosocial Modeling for Determining the Status and Nature of a States Nuclear Activities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gastelum, Zoe N.; Harvey, Julia B.

    2009-09-25

    The International Atomic Energy Agency State Evaluation Process: The Role of Information Analysis in Reaching Safeguards Conclusions (Mathews et al. 2008), several examples of nonproliferation models using analytical software were developed that may assist the IAEA with collecting, visualizing, analyzing, and reporting information in support of the State Evaluation Process. This paper focuses on one of the examples a set of models developed in the Proactive Scenario Production, Evidence Collection, and Testing (ProSPECT) software that evaluates the status and nature of a states nuclear activities. The models use three distinct subject areas to perform this assessment: the presence of nuclear activities, the consistency of those nuclear activities with national nuclear energy goals, and the geopolitical context in which those nuclear activities are taking place. As a proof-of-concept for the models, a crude case study was performed. The study, which attempted to evaluate the nuclear activities taking place in Syria prior to September 2007, yielded illustrative, yet inconclusive, results. Due to the inconclusive nature of the case study results, changes that may improve the models efficiency and accuracy are proposed.

  17. Volume I, Summary Report: A Roadmap to Deploy New Nuclear Power Plants in the United States by 2010:

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nuclear power plants in the United States currently produce about 20 percent of the nation’s electricity. This nuclear-generated electricity is safe, clean and economical, and does not emit...

  18. Natural Circulation in Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Phenomena, models, and methodology for system reliability assessments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jose Reyes

    2005-02-14

    In recent years it has been recognized that the application of passive safety systems (i.e., those whose operation takes advantage of natural forces such as convection and gravity), can contribute to simplification and potentially to improved economics of new nuclear power plant designs. In 1991 the IAEA Conference on ''The Safety of Nuclear Power: Strategy for the Future'' noted that for new plants the use of passive safety features is a desirable method of achieving simplification and increasing the reliability of the performance of essential safety functions, and should be used wherever appropriate''.

  19. Tritium Transport at the Rulison Site, a Nuclear-stimulated Low-permeability Natural Gas Reservoir

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    C. Cooper; M. Ye; J. Chapman

    2008-04-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies conducted a program in the 1960s and 1970s that evaluated technology for the nuclear stimulation of low-permeability natural gas reservoirs. The second project in the program, Project Rulison, was located in west-central Colorado. A 40-kiltoton nuclear device was detonated 2,568 m below the land surface in the Williams Fork Formation on September 10, 1969. The natural gas reservoirs in the Williams Fork Formation occur in low permeability, fractured sandstone lenses interbedded with shale. Radionuclides derived from residual fuel products, nuclear reactions, and activation products were generated as a result of the detonation. Most of the radionuclides are contained in a cooled, solidified melt glass phase created from vaporized and melted rock that re-condensed after the test. Of the mobile gas-phase radionuclides released, tritium ({sup 3}H or T) migration is of most concern. The other gas-phase radionuclides ({sup 85}Kr, {sup 14}C) were largely removed during production testing in 1969 and 1970 and are no longer present in appreciable amounts. Substantial tritium remained because it is part of the water molecule, which is present in both the gas and liquid (aqueous) phases. The objectives of this work are to calculate the nature and extent of tritium contamination in the subsurface from the Rulison test from the time of the test to present day (2007), and to evaluate tritium migration under natural-gas production conditions to a hypothetical gas production well in the most vulnerable location outside the DOE drilling restriction. The natural-gas production scenario involves a hypothetical production well located 258 m horizontally away from the detonation point, outside the edge of the current drilling exclusion area. The production interval in the hypothetical well is at the same elevation as the nuclear chimney created by the detonation, in order to evaluate the location most vulnerable to tritium migration.

  20. Summary and analysis of public comments on NUREG-1317: Regulatory options for nuclear plant license renewal: Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ligon, D.M.; Seth, S.S.

    1989-03-01

    On August 29, 1988, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on nuclear plant license renewal and solicited public comments on NUREG-1317, ''Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal.'' NUREG-1317 presents a discussion of fifteen topics involving technical, environmental, and procedural issues and poses a set of related questions. As part of its ongoing task for the NRC, The MITRE Corporation has summarized and analyzed the public comments received. Fifty-three written comments were received. Of these, 83 percent were from nuclear industry representatives; the remaining comments represented federal and state agencies, public interest groups, and a private citizen.

  1. State policies affecting natural gas consumption (Notice of inquiry issued on August 14, 1992). Summary of comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lemon, R.; Kamphuis-Zatopa, W.

    1993-03-25

    On August 14, 1992, the United States Department of Energy issued a Request for Comments Concerning State Policies Affecting Natural Gas Consumption. This Notice of (NOI) noted the increasing significance of the role played by states and sought to gain better understanding of how state policies impact the gas industry. The general trend toward a. more competitive marketplace for natural gas, as well as recent regulatory and legislative changes at the Federal level, are driving State regulatory agencies to reevaluate how they regulate natural gas. State action is having a significant impact on the use of natural gas for generating electricity, as well as affecting the cost-effective trade-off between conservation expenditures and gas use. Additionally, fuel choice has an impact upon the environment and national energy security. In light of these dimensions, the Department of Energy initiated this study of State regulation. The goals of this NOI are: (1) help DOE better understand the impact of State policies on the efficient use of gas; (2) increase the awareness of the natural gas industry and Federal and State officials to the important role of State policies and regulations; (3) create an improved forum for dialogue on State and Federal natural gas issues; and, (4) develop a consensus on an analytical agenda that would be most helpful in addressing the regulatory challenges faced by the States. Ninety-seven parties filed comments, and of these ninety-seven, fifteen parties filed reply comments. Appendix One lists these parties. This report briefly syntheses the comments received. The goal is to assist parties to judging the extent of consensus on the problems posed and the remedies suggested, aid in identifying future analytical analyses, and assist parties in assessing differences in strategies and regulatory philosophies which shape these issues and their resolution.

  2. FY 1996 activity summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-04-01

    The US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety provides nuclear safety policy, independent technical evaluation, and technical support. A summary of these activities is provided in this report. These include: (1) changing the mission of the former production facilities to storage and waste management; (2) stabilizing nuclear materials not recycled due to production cessation or interruptions; (3) reformulating the authorization basis for existing facilities to convert to a standards based approach for operations consistent with modern expectations; and (4) implementing a modern regulatory framework for nuclear facilities. Enforcement of the Price-Anderson Amendments Act is also reported.

  3. Natural Gas and Hydrogen Infrastructure Opportunities Workshop, October 18-19, 2011, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL : Summary Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kumar, R. comp.; Ahmed, S. comp.

    2012-02-21

    The overall objective of the Workshop was to identify opportunities for accelerating the use of both natural gas (NG) and hydrogen (H{sub 2}) as motor fuels and in stationary power applications. Specific objectives of the Workshop were to: (1) Convene industry and other stakeholders to share current status/state-of-the-art of NG and H{sub 2} infrastructure; (2) Identify key challenges (including non-technical challenges, such as permitting, installation, codes, and standards) preventing or delaying the widespread deployment of NG and H{sub 2} infrastructure. Identify synergies between NG and H{sub 2} fuels; and (3) Identify and prioritize opportunities for addressing the challenges identified above, and determine roles and opportunities for both the government and industry stakeholders. Plenary speakers and panel discussions summarized the current status of the NG and H{sub 2} infrastructure, technology for their use in transportation and stationary applications, and some of the major challenges and opportunities to more widespread use of these fuels. Two break-out sessions of three groups each addressed focus questions on: (1) infrastructure development needs; (2) deployment synergies; (3) natural gas and fuel cell vehicles (NGVs, FCVs), specialty vehicles, and heavy-duty trucks; (4) CHP (combined heat and power), CHHP (combined hydrogen, heat, and power), and synergistic approaches; and (5) alternative uses of natural gas.

  4. FY13 Summary Report on the Augmentation of the Spent Fuel Composition Dataset for Nuclear Forensics: SFCOMPO/NF

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brady Raap, Michaele C.; Lyons, Jennifer A.; Collins, Brian A.; Livingston, James V.

    2014-03-31

    This report documents the FY13 efforts to enhance a dataset of spent nuclear fuel isotopic composition data for use in developing intrinsic signatures for nuclear forensics. A review and collection of data from the open literature was performed in FY10. In FY11, the Spent Fuel COMPOsition (SFCOMPO) excel-based dataset for nuclear forensics (NF), SFCOMPO/NF was established and measured data for graphite production reactors, Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs) and Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) were added to the dataset and expanded to include a consistent set of data simulated by calculations. A test was performed to determine whether the SFCOMPO/NF dataset will be useful for the analysis and identification of reactor types from isotopic ratios observed in interdicted samples.

  5. Summary and bibliography of safety-related events at boiling-water nuclear power plants as reported in 1980

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    McCormack, K.E.; Gallaher, R.B.

    1982-03-01

    This document presents a bibliography that contains 100-word abstracts of event reports submitted to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission concerning operational events that occurred at boiling-water-reactor nuclear power plants in 1980. The 1547 abstracts included on microfiche in this bibliography describe incidents, failures, and design or construction deficiencies that were experienced at the facilities. These abstracts are arranged alphabetically by reactor name and then chronologically for each reactor. Full-size keyword and permuted-title indexes to facilitate location of individual abstracts are provided following the text. Tables that summarize the information contained in the bibliography are also provided. The information in the tables includes a listing of the equipment items involved in the reported events and the associated number of reports for each item. Similar information is given for the various kinds of instrumentation and systems, causes of failures, deficiencies noted, and the time of occurrence (i.e., during refueling, operation, testing, or construction).

  6. NUCLEAR ENERGY

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ROADMAP Table of Contents List of Acronyms ................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................... v 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 2. Background

  7. Executive Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Executive Summary September 2015 Quadrennial Technology Review ES Executive Summary ES Executive Summary Introduction The United States is in the midst of an energy revolution. Over the last decade, the United States has slashed net petroleum imports, dramatically increased shale gas production, scaled up wind and solar power, and cut the growth in electricity consumption to nearly zero through widespread efficiency measures. Emerging advanced energy technologies provide a rich set of options to

  8. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Reveals the Assembly and Evolution of Complex Metalloenzymes summary written by Raven Hanna The potential for using biological enzymes to make hydrogen to use as a...

  9. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Fuel Cell Costs by Changing the Structure and Reactivity of Platinum summary written by Raven Hanna Hydrogen fuel cells are a green alternative to fossil fuels for powering...

  10. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Potential Effects of Aerosol Source on Ocean Photosynthesis summary written by Raven ... Soluble iron can reach oceans by water currents carrying dusts or by air currents carrying ...

  11. Program Summaries

    Office of Science (SC) Website

    Program Summaries Basic Energy Sciences (BES) BES Home About Research Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BES Funding Opportunities Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee ...

  12. FY 2015 Summary Control Table by Organization

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 Summary Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) Summary Control by Organization Page 1 FY 2015 Congressional Request FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 Current Enacted Adjustments Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Approp. Request Discretionary Summary By Organization Department Of Energy By Organization National Nuclear Security Administration Weapons Activities............................................................................. 6,966,855 7,781,000

  13. New Hampshire Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Imports 5.48 5.45 4.08 6.63 10.55 1999-2014 Exports -- 7.54 2.62 6.65 4.06 2007-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1980-2005 Citygate 8.83 8.07 7.15 7.60 9.28 NA 1984-2015 Residential 14.46 14.67 13.74 13.84 16.27 NA 1980-2015 Commercial 12.72 11.46 11.95 12.13 14.96 13.63 1977-2015 Industrial 11.59 11.57 10.48 10.68 9.46 8.10 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 1994-1995 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 18,297 19,826 47,451 63,446 52,160 1982-2014 Exports

  14. South Dakota Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  15. West Virginia Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 115,055 114,871 111,932 108,711 96,802 105,945 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA ...

  16. New York Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  17. ,"West Virginia Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...,"Production",10,"Monthly","122015","1151991" ,"Data 3","Underground ... 35292,,435487,304592,130895,20814,900,19913 35323,,463642,304592,159050,28469,460,280...

  18. New Hampshire Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7.87 7.17 5.90 NA 4.34 6.40 1989-2015 Residential 19.32 22.79 23.02 17.97 14.18 15.13 1989-2015 Commercial 13.74 14.78 14.76 12.30 11.15 12.39 1989-2015 Industrial 4.81 4.75 4.00 4.30 5.91 7.74 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers NA NA NA NA NA NA 2001-2015 Residential 146 147 148 242 657 854 1989-2015 Commercial 221 226 232 377 823 1,017 1989-2015 Industrial NA NA NA NA NA NA 2001-2015 Vehicle Fuel 6 6 6 6 6 6 2010-2015 Electric

  19. New Jersey Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.67 4.84 5.00 4.37 4.30 4.27 1989-2015 Residential 12.03 12.98 12.38 10.30 9.08 7.85 1989-2015 Commercial 8.66 8.78 8.03 8.10 8.66 8.24 1989-2015 Industrial 8.62 8.41 8.63 7.57 7.11 7.92 2001-2015 Electric Power 2.07 2.20 2.08 2.00 1.80 1.71 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 47,857 46,260 NA NA 56,469 63,409 2001-2015 Residential 5,478 4,422 4,498 9,214 16,149 22,163 1989-2015 Commercial 7,486 8,431 NA NA 11,186 13,623 1989-2015 Industrial 4,256 4,032 4,128 4,370

  20. New Mexico Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3.64 3.74 3.57 3.34 NA 2.76 1989-2015 Residential 14.45 14.81 14.74 12.99 8.21 6.71 1989-2015 Commercial 7.52 7.65 7.65 7.67 NA 5.28 1989-2015 Industrial 4.86 4.93 5.03 5.03 4.93 4.56 2001-2015 Electric Power 3.86 3.28 3.13 3.11 2.64 2.46 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 109,430 112,061 109,134 112,013 107,721 102,253 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From

  1. North Carolina Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.64 4.68 4.46 3.88 NA 3.10 1989-2015 Residential 21.31 NA 21.72 14.57 12.12 12.84 1989-2015 Commercial 9.38 NA 9.30 8.01 8.45 NA 1989-2015 Industrial 5.78 5.70 5.96 5.86 5.57 5.70 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 37,432 NA 35,685 35,342 43,008 NA 2001-2015 Residential 1,090 NA 1,121 2,814 6,342 7,028 1989-2015 Commercial 2,535 NA 3,004 4,282 5,548 NA 1989-2015 Industrial 7,854 8,154 7,974 9,044 8,911 9,049 2001-2015 Vehicle

  2. North Dakota Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3.56 4.32 5.00 4.58 4.16 3.94 1989-2015 Residential 21.07 NA NA 9.60 6.57 5.61 1989-2015 Commercial 8.73 8.86 7.91 NA 5.68 5.23 1989-2015 Industrial 3.12 2.96 2.81 2.76 2.58 2.88 2001-2015 Electric Power 2.87 3.03 3.09 2.67 2.08 2.07 2002-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Gross Withdrawals 51,167 50,537 47,895 50,958 49,559 51,065 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2015 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells

  3. Rhode Island Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2.52 2.41 2.31 2.24 2.22 2.22 1989-2015 Residential 19.72 20.92 20.98 19.02 15.46 13.47 1989-2015 Commercial 16.62 17.00 17.11 15.74 12.87 10.96 1989-2015 Industrial 9.61 10.09 9.79 9.92 9.48 8.22 2001-2015 Electric Power 2.40 2.42 2.78 3.74 3.50 W 2002-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1994-1996 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 8,254 8,371 4,837 6,216 7,643 6,847 2001-2015 Residential 430 397 385 1,038 1,591 1,903 1989-2015 Commercial 258 249 244

  4. South Carolina Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3.97 3.96 4.01 3.56 3.20 3.48 1989-2015 Residential 24.86 22.97 24.15 16.51 NA NA 1989-2015 Commercial 8.33 8.04 8.28 7.97 8.35 10.06 1989-2015 Industrial 4.22 4.46 4.13 4.03 3.86 4.01 2001-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 23,407 22,303 20,307 22,863 25,780 NA 2001-2015 Residential 496 521 542 1,020 2,345 2,982 1989-2015 Commercial 1,324 1,399 1,380 1,827 2,136 NA 1989-2015 Industrial 6,642 6,718 6,616 7,238 7,342 NA 2001-2015

  5. New Mexico Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5.32 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 4.84 4.52 3.70 4.08 4.99 NA 1984-2015 Residential 9.63 9.14 8.69 8.92 10.13 8.58 1967-2015 Commercial 7.47 6.98 6.31 6.77 7.87 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 6.17 6.22 4.96 5.58 6.45 4.95 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 4.46 9.43 10.05 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W 4.35 4.93 3.21 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 15,412 15,005 13,586 13,576 15,283 1977-2014 Adjustments -89 73 153 -202 555 1977-2014

  6. New York Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5 1967-2010 Imports 5.43 4.96 3.83 5.59 8.60 1989-2014 Exports -- 4.69 3.61 4.29 5.56 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.86 6.04 5.35 5.02 5.47 4.14 1984-2015 Residential 14.04 13.71 12.97 12.49 12.54 11.20 1967-2015 Commercial 10.88 9.32 7.84 8.00 8.31 6.89 1967-2015 Industrial 8.55 8.18 6.92 7.44 8.13 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 8.32 9.81 21.00 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.73 5.56 3.95 5.26 5.46 3.51 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of

  7. North Dakota Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2 1967-2010 Imports 4.41 4.04 2.72 3.59 5.00 1994-2014 Exports -- -- -- -- 14.71 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.50 5.06 4.43 4.99 6.37 NA 1984-2015 Residential 8.08 8.10 7.43 7.43 8.86 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 7.03 7.00 6.04 6.32 7.74 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 5.22 5.10 4.48 4.14 5.61 3.14 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 8.84 8.08 6.17 1990-2012 Electric Power 6.51 8.66 6.44 -- 4.08 2.89 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 1,667 2,381

  8. South Dakota Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    NA 1979-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.54 5.21 4.67 4.83 6.14 4.17 1984-2015 Residential 8.77 8.59 8.39 8.23 9.27 8.21 1967-2015 Commercial 7.13 6.98 6.45 6.59 7.65 6.11 1967-2015 Industrial 5.92 6.25 5.37 5.67 6.88 4.98 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1991-2012 Electric Power 5.50 5.04 3.54 4.35 4.98 3.31 1998-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 102 100 95 65 68 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 12,540 12,449 15,085 16,205 15,307 1967-2014 From

  9. West Virginia Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.31 5.91 4.99 4.65 5.07 4.00 1984-2015 Residential 11.39 10.91 10.77 9.98 10.21 10.46 1967-2015 Commercial 10.27 9.65 9.35 8.61 8.92 9.15 1967-2015 Industrial 5.40 4.89 3.60 4.30 5.00 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1992-2012 Electric Power 5.14 W 3.33 4.29 W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 7,000 10,345 14,611 22,765 29,432 1977-2014 Adjustments -359 -1 251 -565 -559 1977-2014

  10. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    LabSpaces New Research Puts Theory of Water Structure on Thin Ice summary written by Raven Hanna Water has unusual and complex properties that make it especially well suited to...

  11. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Finding the Crystal Structure of P-gp: A Protein that Makes Cancer Cells Resistant to Chemotherapy summary written by Raven Hanna Medications can be...

  12. Annual Planning Summaries: 2012 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    2 Annual Planning Summaries: 2012 February 23, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Oak Ridge Office The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the Oak Ridge Office. February 8, 2012 2012 Annual Planning Summary for NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation. February 3, 2012

  13. Guide for the Mitigation of Natural Phenomena Hazards for DOE Nuclear Facilities and NonNuclear Facilities

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2000-03-28

    This document provides guidance in implementing the Natural Phenomena Hazard (NPH) mitigation requirements of DOE O 420.1, Facility Safety, Section 4.4, "Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation." This Guide does not establish or invoke any new requirements. Any apparent conflicts arising from the NPH guidance would defer to the requirements in DOE O 420.1. No cancellation.

  14. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    FUSION ENERGY SCIENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Panel on High Energy Density Laboratory Plasmas ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF HIGH ENERGY DENSITY LABORATORY PLASMAS January 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................... 5 1 HIGH ENERGY DENSITY LABORATORY PLASMA SCIENCE .................................... 15 2 THE CHARGE TO FESAC

  15. Environmental consequences of postulated plutonium releases from Exxon Nuclear MOFP, Richland, Washington, as a result of severe natural phenomena

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jamison, J.D.; Watson, E.C.

    1980-02-01

    Potential environmental consequences in terms of radiation dose to people are presented for postulated plutonium releases caused by severe natural phenomena at the Exxon Nuclear Company Mixed Oxide Fabrication Plant (MOFP), Richland, Washington. The severe natural phenomena considered are earthquakes, tornadoes, high straight-line winds, and floods. Maximum plutonium deposition values are given for significant locations around the site. All important potential exposure pathways are examined. The most likely 50-year committed dose equivalents are given for the maximum-exposed individual and the population within a 50-mile radius of the plant. The maximum plutonium deposition values most likely to occur offsite are also given.

  16. Usage Summaries

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Usage Summaries PDSF Group Batch Summary Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 Partial SGE62 2015 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 2014 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 2013 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 2012 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 2011 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62 SGE62

  17. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    10 image Outside view of the T=4 subunit arrangement. » Links Scientific Highlight Johnson Lab » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Following the pH-dependent Conformational Changes of a Maturing Viral Capsid summary written by Raven Hanna The capsid that surrounds viruses is formed from subunit proteins that interact in specific ways to form a tight shell. The processes of coming together and forming interactions are multistep and complex and are fundamental events to

  18. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    February 25, 2010 seafloor_biofilms Image of pillow basalts from inside the Pisces Submersible. » Links Scientific Highlight Templeton Lab EMSL News Imaging at SSRL » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Researchers Discover an Unexpected Source of Energy for Deep-sea Microbial Communities summary written by Raven Hanna New rock formed by deep undersea volcanoes does not stay bare long. Microbes quickly move onto these basalts to form communities in the form of biofilms. As

  19. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Hasan Research Princeton News Release » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Macroscopic Quantum Insulator State Observed summary written by Raven Hanna One of the strangest consequences of quantum mechanics is the seemingly instantaneous communication of subatomic particles over long distances. Known as quantum entanglement, pairs or groups of particles can become linked so that any changes made to one will cause the others to respond quicker than the time it takes for light

  20. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    03, 2008 » Links Scientific Highlight Tainer Website Scripps Press Release » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Role of Specific Protein Mutations in Causing Human Disease Revealed summary written by Brad Plummer, SLAC Communication Office Scientists are one step closer to understanding a piece of the machinery involved in DNA transcription and repair, thanks to work done in part at the SSRL macromolecular crystallography Beam Line 11-1. The team, led by The Scripps

  1. EFRC Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Energy Frontier Research Center Alex Zunger (NREL) Summary statement: We will focus on material discovery via an "Inverse Band Structure" (IBS) methodology to theoretically identify promising structures and compositions and then apply a combination of high-throughput and targeted materials synthesis to experimentally converge on the optimum properties. RESEARCH PLAN AND DIRECTIONS Rather than use the conventional approach "given the structure, find the electronic properties,"

  2. 2015 NEET Crosscutting Award Summaries | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NEET Crosscutting Award Summaries 2015 NEET Crosscutting Award Summaries The Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies Crosscutting Technology Development (NEET- CTD) Award Summaries describe the research achievements and planned accomplishments for ongoing projects under Reactor Materials, Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation, and Advanced Methods for Manufacturing sub-programs. These summaries will be updated annually, as needed. PDF icon 2015 Advanced Methods for Manufacturing Awards Summaries.pdf

  3. nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    2%2A en U.S-, Japan Exchange Best Practices on Nuclear Emergency Response http:nnsa.energy.govmediaroompressreleasesu.s-japan-exchange-best-practices-nuclear-emergency-respon...

  4. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Hg Methylation » Links Scientific Highlight BL2-3 BL6-2C BL9-3 BL10-2 » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Imaging Mercury in the Rhizosphere of Wetland Plants summary written by Raven Hanna High levels of mercury in our diets can have adverse effects on our health, and fish are a major source of dietary mercury. Because of a process called biomagnification, mercury levels in fish can build up to be at a much higher concentration than in the surrounding water. The mercury

  5. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7, 2008 » Links Scientific Highlight Harbury Website » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces A Golden Ruler Used to Measure the Stretching Rigidity of Short-length Scale DNA summary written by Brad Plummer, SLAC Communication Office DNA is softer and stretchier than previously believed, at least on the short length scales of up to 20 base pairs. This finding is the result of a recent study conducted in part at SSRL's biological small-angle x-ray scattering Beam Line 4-2 by a

  6. Science Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    25, 2008 » Links Scientific Highlight Saphire Website Scripps Press Release Tracking Ebola, Scripps At the Forefront » Share this Article Laboratree Ologeez SciLink LabSpaces Revealing a Structural Weakness of the Deadly Ebolavirus summary written by Brad Plummer, SLAC Communication Office Scientists are one step closer to conquering the deadly Ebolavirus, thanks to research conducted at SSRL structural biology Beam Lines 9-2 and 11-1 and ALS Beam Line 5.02 by a team of researchers led by

  7. Chair Summaries

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Chair Summaries from the 2006 Innovative Confinement Concepts (ICC) Workshop D. Craig, 1 R. Goldston, 2 T. R. Jarboe, 3 B. A. Nelson, 3 C. R. Sovinec, 1 S. Woodruff, 3, *and G. Wurden 4 The goal of the ICC program within the DOE Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (OFES) is to improve magnetic and inertial fusion concepts and to advance plasma science. ICC2006 is a continuation of the ICC series, which last year met in Madison, Wisconsin. It provides a forum for an exchange of ideas through

  8. Executive Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE/RL-2011-50, REV. 1 iii DOE/RL-2011-50, REV. 1 iv This page intentionally left blank. DOE/RL-2011-50, REV. 1 v Executive Summary The evaluation of potential impacts to groundwater from contaminants in the vadose zone at the Hanford Site is important for making final remedial action decisions for waste sites. The potential impacts or risk associated with groundwater protection pertains to soil contamination throughout the entire vadose zone, and is the principal exposure pathway for

  9. FY 2013 Summary Report: Post-Irradiation Examination of Zircaloy...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Summary Report: Post-Irradiation Examination of Zircaloy-4 Samples in Target Capsules and Initiation of Bending Fatigue Testing for Used Nuclear Fuel Vibration Integrity ...

  10. Data Quality Objectives Summary Report:

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1-68 Revision 0 Data Quality Objectives Summary Report: Evaluation of Natural Beryllium and Its Ratio to Other Metals in Background Hanford Surface Soils Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Rich land Operations S ENERGY Office RO. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 APProwed for Public Rehe Futw Dlserrdn Ur~kled DOE/RL-201 1-68 Revision 0 Data Quality Objectives Summary Report: Evaluation of Natural Beryllium and Its

  11. Microsoft Word - FINAL_RAP_Mar2007_summary.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    7, 2007 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE MEETING March 7, 2007 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Welcome and Introductions ................................................................................................ 1 100 Area Cleanup Status..................................................................................................... 2 Natural Resource Trustees Council

  12. Natural Gas Monthly (NGM) - Energy Information Administration...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    solar, wind, geothermal, biomass and ethanol. Nuclear & Uranium Uranium fuel, nuclear reactors, generation, spent fuel. Total Energy Comprehensive data summaries, comparisons,...

  13. Spent Nuclear Fuel

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Nuclear & Uranium Glossary › FAQS › Overview Data Status of U.S. Nuclear Outages (interactive) Summary Uranium & nuclear fuel Nuclear power plants Spent nuclear fuel International All nuclear data reports Analysis & Projections Major Topics Most popular Nuclear plants and reactors Projections Recurring Uranium All reports Browse by Tag Alphabetical Frequency Tag Cloud Previous releases 2002 1998 Spent Nuclear Fuel Release date: December 7, 2015 Next release date: Late 2018 Spent

  14. Radionuclide Migration at the Rio Blanco Site, A Nuclear-stimulated Low-permeability Natural Gas Reservoir

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clay A. Cooper; Ming Ye; Jenny Chapman; Craig Shirley

    2005-10-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy and its predecessor agencies conducted a program in the 1960s and 1970s that evaluated technology for the nuclear stimulation of low-permeability gas reservoirs. The third and final project in the program, Project Rio Blanco, was conducted in Rio Blanco County, in northwestern Colorado. In this experiment, three 33-kiloton nuclear explosives were simultaneously detonated in a single emplacement well in the Mesaverde Group and Fort Union Formation, at depths of 1,780, 1,899, and 2,039 m below land surface on May 17, 1973. The objective of this work is to estimate lateral distances that tritium released from the detonations may have traveled in the subsurface and evaluate the possible effect of postulated natural-gas development on radionuclide migration. Other radionuclides were considered in the analysis, but the majority occur in relatively immobile forms (such as nuclear melt glass). Of the radionuclides present in the gas phase, tritium dominates in terms of quantity of radioactivity in the long term and contribution to possible whole body exposure. One simulation is performed for {sup 85}Kr, the second most abundant gaseous radionuclide produced after tritium.

  15. Executive Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    United States Department of Energy Savannah River Site Ten Year Site Plan Limited Update FY 2015 - 2024 June 2014 SRNS-RP-2014-00006 Savannah River Site - Ten Year Site Plan Limited Update Savannah River Site Ten Year Site Plan FY2015-2024 SRNS-RP-2014-00006 June 2014 Page 2 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC (SRNS) for the United States Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC09-08SR22470 and is an account of work performed under that contract.

  16. Sensors Synergistic With Nature For In-pile Nuclear Reactor Measurements

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    James A. Smith; Dale K. Kotter; Steven L. Garrett; Randall A. Ali

    2012-10-01

    To be able to evolve fuel and structural microstructure within a nuclear power reactor in an engineered manner, an effective extreme environment sensor must exist. The development of sensor technology for nondestructive and nonintrusive measurements in harsh environments is a very active field. However most of the effort has been in adapting existing sensing technology to meet the harsh environmental requirements. A different approach is being presented. The fundamental question that we are trying to answer is how do we take advantage of the harsh environment and maintain synergy between the sensor and the environment. This paper will discuss the synergistic senor being developed that takes advantage of the harsh environments.

  17. 3116 Public Meeting Summaries - July 2007 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    116 Public Meeting Summaries - July 2007 3116 Public Meeting Summaries - July 2007 The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States Department Of Energy Public Meeting Discussion of the Implementation of Section 3116 of the National Defense Authorization Act PDF icon 3116 Public Meeting Summaries - July 2007 More Documents & Publications 3116 Public Meeting Summaries - November 2006 Transcript of March 4, 2011 Joint Public Meeting U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF

  18. Fabrication of Natural Uranium UO2 Disks (Phase II): Texas A&M Work for Others Summary Document

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gerczak, Tyler J.; Baldwin, Charles A.; Schmidlin, Joshua E.; Henry, Jr, John James

    2015-08-28

    The steps to fabricate natural UO2 disks for an irradiation campaign led by Texas A&M University are outlined. The process was initiated with stoichiometry adjustment of parent, U3O8 powder. The next stage of sample preparation involved exploratory pellet pressing and sintering to achieve the desired natural UO2 pellet densities. Ideal densities were achieved through the use of a bimodal powder size blend. The steps involved with disk fabrication are also presented, describing the coring and thinning process executed to achieve final dimensionality.

  19. Scoping Comment Summary 092412.docx

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Scoping Comment Summary for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, and Tennessee Valley Authority Since announcement of the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SPD Supplemental EIS), DOE has provided three opportunities for the public to provide scoping comments (2007 [72 FR 14543]; 2010 [75 FR 41850]; and 2012 [77 FR 1920]). The public scoping

  20. NNSA releases Stockpile Stewardship Program quarterly experiments summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration releases Stockpile Stewardship Program quarterly experiments summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  1. FY 2006 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  2. FY 2006 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration 6 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  3. FY 2007 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  4. FY 2007 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration 7 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  5. FY 2008 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  6. FY 2008 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  7. FY 2008 Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  8. FY 2009 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  9. FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  10. FY 2010 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  11. FY 2010 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  12. FY 2011 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  13. FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  14. FY 2012 Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  15. FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press

  16. NNSA's Stockpile Stewardship Program Quarterly Experiments summary now

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    available | National Nuclear Security Administration Stockpile Stewardship Program Quarterly Experiments summary now available | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional

  17. STEP Financial Incentives Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    STEP Financial Incentives Summary, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

  18. Sustaining International CBRN Centers of Excellence with a Focus on Nuclear Security and Safeguards: Initial Scoping Session London, 23-24 September 2013 SUMMARY REPORT

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Anderson, Roger G.; Frazar, Sarah L.

    2013-12-12

    This report provides a summary-level description of the key information, observations, ideas, and recommendations expressed during the subject meeting. The report is organized to correspond to the meeting agenda provided in Appendix 1 and includes references to several of the participants listed in Appendix 2 .The meeting venue was Lloyds Register in the City of London. Lloyds Register graciously accommodated the request of The Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNNL) with whom it works on various safeguards activities commissioned by NNSA. PNNL and NNSA also shared the goal of the meeting/study with the United Kingdom (UK) Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the Department of Energy and Climate Change with whom they coordinated the participant list.

  19. Topics in nuclear power (Journal Article) | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    NUCLEAR POWER STATION; GAIN; JAPAN; NATURAL DISASTERS; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR POWER; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PROBABILISTIC ESTIMATION; REACTOR ACCIDENTS; REACTOR MAINTENANCE;...

  20. FY 2009 Summary Table by Appropriation

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    7 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy.......................... -- 1,722,407 1,255,393 -467,014 -27.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................... -- 138,556 134,000 -4,556 -3.3% Nuclear energy.................................................................. --

  1. 2008 Annual Site Environmental Report Summary Pamphlet

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Annual Site Environmental Report Summary Pamphlet 1 2008 ASER Summary Pamphlet Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. SAND 2009-4984P annual site environmental report 2 Sandia National Laboratories Issued by Sandia

  2. Safeguards summary event list (SSEL), January 1, 1990--December 31, 1995

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-07-01

    The Safeguards Summary Event List (SSEL), Vol. 2, Rev. 4, provides brief summaries of several hundred safeguards-related events involving nuclear material or facilities regulated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which occurred and were reported from January 1, 1990, rough December 31, 1995. Because of public interest, the Miscellaneous category includes a few events which involve either source material, byproduct material, or natural uranium which are exempt from safeguards requirements. Events are described under the categories of Bomb-related, Intrusion, Missing and/or Allegedly Stolen, Transportation-related, Tampering/Vandalism, Arson, Firearms, Radiological Sabotage, Nonradiological Sabotage, and Miscellaneous. The information contained in the event descriptions is derived primarily from official NRC reporting channels.

  3. Safeguards Summary Event List (SSEL), January 1, 1990--December 31, 1996, Vol. 2, Rev. 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-07-01

    The Safeguards Summary Event List (SSEL), Vol. 2, Rev. 5, provides brief summaries of several hundred safeguards-related events involving nuclear material or facilities regulated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which occurred and were reported from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1996. Because of public interest, the Miscellaneous category includes a few events which involve either source material, byproduct material, or natural uranium which are exempt from safeguards requirements. Events are described under the categories of Bomb-related, Intrusion, Missing and/or Allegedly Stolen, Transportation-related, Tampering/Vandalism, Arson, Firearms, Radiological Sabotage, Nonradiological Sabotage, and Miscellaneous. The information contained in the event descriptions is derived primarily from official NRC reporting channels.

  4. Nuclear Safety Information | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Nuclear Safety Information Nuclear Safety Information Idaho National Laboratory's Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) | April 8, 2009 Idaho National Laboratory's Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) | April 8, 2009 Nuclear Facilities List and Map Nuclear Safety Regulatory Framework Summary Pamphlet, Nuclear Safety at the Department of Energy External Nuclear Safety Links Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Contact Tom Staker

  5. Health effects model for nuclear power plant accident consequence analysis. Part I. Introduction, integration, and summary. Part II. Scientific basis for health effects models

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Evans, J.S.; Moeller, D.W.; Cooper, D.W.

    1985-07-01

    Analysis of the radiological health effects of nuclear power plant accidents requires models for predicting early health effects, cancers and benign thyroid nodules, and genetic effects. Since the publication of the Reactor Safety Study, additional information on radiological health effects has become available. This report summarizes the efforts of a program designed to provide revised health effects models for nuclear power plant accident consequence modeling. The new models for early effects address four causes of mortality and nine categories of morbidity. The models for early effects are based upon two parameter Weibull functions. They permit evaluation of the influence of dose protraction and address the issue of variation in radiosensitivity among the population. The piecewise-linear dose-response models used in the Reactor Safety Study to predict cancers and thyroid nodules have been replaced by linear and linear-quadratic models. The new models reflect the most recently reported results of the follow-up of the survivors of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and permit analysis of both morbidity and mortality. The new models for genetic effects allow prediction of genetic risks in each of the first five generations after an accident and include information on the relative severity of various classes of genetic effects. The uncertainty in modeloling radiological health risks is addressed by providing central, upper, and lower estimates of risks. An approach is outlined for summarizing the health consequences of nuclear power plant accidents. 298 refs., 9 figs., 49 tabs.

  6. Summary of Natural Resources that Potentially Influence Human Intrusion at the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    NSTec Environmental Management

    2007-06-01

    In 1993, Raytheon Services Nevada completed a review of natural resource literature and other sources to identify potentially exploitable resources and potential future land uses near the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site (RWMS) of the Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nye County, Nevada, that could lead to future inadvertent human intrusion and subsequent release of radionuclides to the accessible environment. National Security Technologies, LLC, revised the original limited-distribution document to conform to current editorial standards and U.S. Department of Energy requirements for public release. The researchers examined the potential for future development of sand, gravel, mineral, petroleum, water resources, and rural land uses, such as agriculture, grazing, and hunting. The study was part of the performance assessment for Greater Confinement Disposal boreholes. Sand and gravel are not considered exploitable site resources because the materials are common throughout the area and the quality at the Area 5 RWMS is not ideal for typical commercial uses. Site information also indicates a very low mineral potential for the area. None of the 23 mining districts in southern Nye County report occurrences of economic mineral deposits in unconsolidated alluvium. The potential for oil and natural gas is low for southern Nye County. No occurrences of coal, tar sand, or oil shale on the NTS are reported in available literature. Several potential future uses of water were considered. Agricultural irrigation is impractical due to poor soils and existing water supply regulations. Use of water for geothermal energy development is unlikely because temperatures are too low for typical commercial applications using current technology. Human consumption of water has the most potential for cause of intrusion. The economics of future water needs may create a demand for the development of deep carbonate aquifers in the region. However, the Area 5 RWMS is not an optimal location for extraction of groundwater from the deep carbonate aquifer. Grazing and hunting are unlikely to be potential causes for inadvertent human intrusion into waste areas because of vegetation characteristics and lack of significant game animal populations.

  7. Natural Gas

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Sandia Energy Energy Search Icon Sandia Home Locations Contact Us Employee Locator Energy & Climate Secure & Sustainable Energy Future Stationary Power Energy Conversion Efficiency Solar Energy Wind Energy Water Power Supercritical CO2 Geothermal Natural Gas Safety, Security & Resilience of the Energy Infrastructure Energy Storage Nuclear Power & Engineering Grid Modernization Battery Testing Nuclear Fuel Cycle Defense Waste Management Programs Advanced Nuclear Energy Nuclear

  8. Storage Trends and Summaries

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Summaries Storage Trends and Summaries Total Bytes Utilized The growth in NERSC's storage systems amounts to roughly 1.7x per year. Total Bytes Utilized Number of Files Stored The ...

  9. BETTER BUILDINGS PARTNER SUMMARIES

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    In addition to Better Buildings Neighborhood Program Summary of Reported Data From July 1, 2010 – September 30, 2013, the following table presents summaries of data reported by an organization...

  10. Pennsylvania State University: Executive Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Executive Summary The Pennsylvania State University's team, Remote Wind Power Systems Unit (PSU), is focused on developing a sustainable, portable wind turbine that can provide power to those in need during the aftermath of natural disasters in the United States. Approximately 25 engineering students from Energy Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Electrical Engineering backgrounds have played a role in the design process. Six students pursuing degrees in Energy,

  11. Albuquerque Roundtable Summary

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Summary from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtable session on April 6, 2011, in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

  12. University Research Summaries

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Idaho National Laboratory published the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Geothermal Technologies Office 2001 University Research Summaries.

  13. ARM - Research Highlights Summaries

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    govPublicationsResearch Highlights Summaries Publications Journal Articles Conference Documents Program Documents Technical Reports Publications Database Public Information...

  14. FY 2011-13 Budget Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Daniel A Vega MPACT Federal Program Manager 2 Outline Introduction - Fuel Cycle Technologies R&D Materials Protection, Accounting and Control Technologies (MPACT) Campaign Overview Details of the R&D Program  Used Fuel Security Analysis and Best Practices  Advanced Instrumentation  Analysis and Assessments  Advanced Integration International Engagement and Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) Summary 3 Introduction  The U.S. DOE Office of Nuclear Energy

  15. Oklahoma Natural Gas - Residential Efficiency Rebates | Department...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    250 Clothes Dryer: up to 500 Summary To encourage customers to install high-efficiency natural gas equipment in homes, Oklahoma Natural Gas offers rebates to residential...

  16. Prices for Natural Gas | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Prices for Natural Gas Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Prices for Natural Gas AgencyCompany Organization: Google Sector: Energy Focus Area: Economic...

  17. Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Pipeline and Distribution Use Price Citygate Price Residential Price Commercial Price Industrial Price Vehicle Fuel Price Electric Power Price Proved Reserves as of 1231 Reserves...

  18. U.S. Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 View History Prices (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Wellhead NA NA NA NA NA NA 1973-2015 Imports 2.56 2.66 2.74 2.75 3.23 2.48 1989-2015...

  19. Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    1,889,299 1,872,951 1,727,152 1,805,864 2,056,648 2,382,574 2001-2015 Alabama 56,930 54,897 50,117 49,292 50,501 54,716 2001-2015 Alaska 3,931 3,785 4,473 5,317 6,929 7,958 2001-2015 Arizona 38,296 42,499 35,461 29,557 25,804 30,415 2001-2015 Arkansas 22,018 21,854 17,958 14,702 18,552 22,561 2001-2015 California 192,918 199,015 189,292 186,757 195,837 235,282 2001-2015 Colorado 18,936 19,060 19,128 22,856 40,791 49,929 2001-2015 Connecticut 16,880 17,528 15,795 17,525 19,928 23,268 2001-2015

  20. Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Citygate Price Residential Price Commercial Price Industrial Price Electric Power Price Gross Withdrawals Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals From Oil Wells Gross Withdrawals From Shale Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals From Coalbed Wells Repressuring Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed Vented and Flared Marketed Production NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Dry Production Imports By Pipeline LNG Imports Exports Exports By Pipeline LNG Exports Underground Storage Capacity Gas in Underground

  1. Commercial Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    133,543 135,676 138,118 192,966 280,282 350,577 1973-2015 Alabama 1,088 1,131 1,174 1,513 2,317 2,366 1989-2015 Alaska 713 766 1,253 1,451 2,103 2,558 1989-2015 Arizona 1,758 1,654 1,714 1,918 3,014 4,130 1989-2015 Arkansas 2,308 2,444 2,571 3,048 3,863 4,724 1989-2015 California 15,962 16,537 15,250 16,321 26,389 29,820 1989-2015 Colorado 1,568 1,456 1,694 2,859 6,789 9,397 1989-2015 Connecticut 2,379 2,512 2,577 3,155 4,122 5,038 1989-2015 Delaware 375 409 432 812 1,065 1,177 1989-2015

  2. District of Columbia Natural Gas Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    82-2005 Citygate -- -- -- -- -- -- 1989-2015 Residential 13.53 13.06 12.10 12.45 13.05 12.52 1980-2015 Commercial 12.26 12.24 11.19 11.64 12.18 11.55 1980-2015 Industrial -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2015 Vehicle Fuel 4.87 4.17 9.38 1995-2012 Electric Power -- 4.96 -- -- -- -- 2001-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 33,251 32,862 28,561 32,743 34,057 1997-2014 Pipeline & Distribution Use 213 1,703 1,068 1,434 1,305 1997-2014 Delivered to Consumers 33,038 31,159 27,493 31,309

  3. Electric Power Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    ,053,747 1,034,595 901,839 797,631 737,310 771,355 2001-2015 Alabama 39,373 37,742 33,356 31,534 31,034 33,249 2001-2015 Alaska 2,365 2,116 1,863 2,096 2,164 2,336 2001-2015 Arizona 33,842 38,244 31,091 24,561 17,672 17,515 2001-2015 Arkansas 12,805 12,523 8,552 4,130 5,434 6,754 2001-2015 California 86,319 91,733 89,295 84,917 59,484 63,111 2001-2015 Colorado 9,620 10,114 9,582 8,172 9,658 8,346 2001-2015 Connecticut 11,619 12,188 10,504 10,291 9,814 11,119 2001-2015 Delaware 5,710 5,119 4,903

  4. District of Columbia Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    -- -- -- -- -- -- 1989-2015 Residential 17.68 18.15 18.17 16.21 12.60 10.70 1989-2015 Commercial 11.15 11.17 11.50 11.68 11.28 10.01 1989-2015 Industrial -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2015 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- -- 2002-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 984 1,037 1,072 1,740 2,437 2,907 2001-2015 Residential 242 240 253 520 911 1,335 1989-2015 Commercial 657 711 736 1,135 1,443 1,487 1989-2015 Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 0 2001-2015 Vehicle Fuel 86 86 83 86 83 86 2010-2015

  5. Residential Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    477,931 481,773 397,489 1967-2014 Colorado 128,993 131,224 130,116 115,695 134,936 132,106 1967-2014 Connecticut 43,995 42,729 44,719 41,050 46,802 51,193 1967-2014 Delaware...

  6. Natural Gas In Underground Storage (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Monthly Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 View History U.S. 7,306,429 7,615,688 7,988,797 8,317,848 8,305,034 8,039,759 1973-2015 Alabama 31,141 30,084 32,501 32,916 34,133 34,382 1995-2015 Alaska 38,725 38,832 38,740 38,792 38,658 38,516 2013-2015 Arkansas 11,798 12,201 12,342 13,063 13,345 13,472 1990-2015 California 540,076 538,318 544,899

  7. Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    3,968 12,748 46,241 7,518 10,810 26,675 2000-2014 Alabama 0 148 383 21 183 0 2000-2014 Alaska 0 0 221 0 272 193 2000-2014 Arkansas 36 807 6,880 6 9 80 2000-2014 California 78 0 52 92 60 1,144 2000-2014 Colorado 437 229 1,218 445 953 567 2000-2014 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2014 Kansas 1 23 122 644 31 1,409 2000-2014 Kentucky 0 39 84 0 1 0 2000-2014 Louisiana 103 847 5,552 285 1,425 4,523 2000-2014 Michigan 16 711 403 0 11 8 2000-2014 Mississippi 2 13 10 109 90 82 2000-2014 Montana 3 30 44 4 4 1

  8. Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Adjustments (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    5,098 509 1,731 -1,588 543 2,256 1977-2014 Alabama 46 32 -49 112 -274 502 1977-2014 Alaska 3 1 -1 -2 -5 -21 1977-2014 Arkansas 5 -34 728 -743 -78 -3 1977-2014 California 11 10 923 -563 -72 34 1977-2014 Colorado 306 449 801 -363 -272 627 1977-2014 Florida 6 64 -54 -2 1 -2 1977-2014 Kansas 224 140 125 -236 -20 94 1977-2014 Kentucky 97 -58 -34 -282 103 -9 1977-2014 Louisiana 319 -612 178 605 -42 487 1981-2014 Michigan -279 243 8 -104 -62 -47 1977-2014 Mississippi 26 1 109 65 29 -15 1977-2014

  9. Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Extensions (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    42,139 44,783 45,909 45,167 49,131 44,599 1977-2014 Alabama 20 28 3 0 0 2 1977-2014 Alaska 2 14 4 45 92 145 1977-2014 Arkansas 4,627 3,082 2,093 1,399 3,419 1,505 1977-2014 California 450 12 73 8 3 0 1977-2014 Colorado 3,346 2,838 2,015 1,563 1,352 1,070 1977-2014 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 1977-2014 Kansas 24 27 62 310 375 271 1977-2014 Kentucky 713 383 4 0 132 0 1977-2014 Louisiana 9,807 10,989 5,793 3,151 1,023 2,740 1981-2014 Michigan 16 1 0 0 0 1 1977-2014 Mississippi 132 33 24 4 5 9 1977-2014

  10. Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Sales (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    4,109 10,153 43,186 9,318 9,558 20,373 2000-2014 Alabama 2 263 573 11 357 2 2000-2014 Alaska 5 131 36 2 91 165 2000-2014 Arkansas 54 393 6,760 1 4 248 2000-2014 California 4 3 47 284 70 1,155 2000-2014 Colorado 374 242 1,244 1,667 584 693 2000-2014 Florida 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000-2014 Kansas 2 17 124 887 31 1,092 2000-2014 Kentucky 0 0 100 0 1 0 2000-2014 Louisiana 127 738 5,583 352 1,049 2,478 2000-2014 Michigan 0 529 643 0 11 1 2000-2014 Mississippi 17 31 11 159 39 115 2000-2014 Montana 3 40 44 30 72

  11. Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Pipeline and Distribution Use Price Citygate Price Residential Price Commercial Price Industrial Price Vehicle Fuel Price Electric Power Price Proved Reserves as of 12/31 Reserves Adjustments Reserves Revision Increases Reserves Revision Decreases Reserves Sales Reserves Acquisitions Reserves Extensions Reserves New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Number of Producing Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells Gross Withdrawals From

  12. Vehicle Fuel Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    28,664 29,974 29,970 30,044 35,280 34,459 1997-2015 Alabama 105 192 193 190 224 220 1988-2015 Alaska 20 11 11 9 10 11 1997-2015 Arizona 2,015 1,712 1,707 1,730 2,032 1,976 1988-2015 Arkansas 16 21 21 27 31 28 1988-2015 California 13,572 14,660 14,671 14,121 16,581 16,467 1988-2015 Colorado 249 282 281 269 316 314 1988-2015 Connecticut 41 27 27 46 54 44 1988-2015 Delaware 1 1 1 1 1 1 1988-2015 District of Columbia 883 879 870 861 1,011 993 1988-2015 Florida 60 84 84 175 206 159 1988-2015 Georgia

  13. Residential Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    108,125 102,264 107,571 200,678 399,624 588,560 1973-2015 Alabama 702 694 671 934 2,031 3,411 1989-2015 Alaska 493 527 1,033 1,422 2,306 2,670 1989-2015 Arizona 1,056 971 1,072 1,334 3,107 6,609 1989-2015 Arkansas 557 514 546 731 2,155 3,933 1989-2015 California 19,107 17,560 17,188 19,412 44,802 73,730 1989-2015 Colorado 2,725 2,476 3,036 5,976 16,679 23,229 1989-2015 Connecticut 1,120 997 975 2,158 3,952 4,884 1989-2015 Delaware 163 166 157 378 720 978 1989-2015 District of Columbia 242 240

  14. Base Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Monthly Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 View History U.S. 4,371,340 4,363,455 4,364,233 4,364,778 4,367,380 4,362,559 1973-2015 Alabama 9,640 9,640 9,640 9,640 9,640 9,640 1995-2015 Alaska 14,197 14,197 14,197 14,197 14,197 14,197 2013-2015 Arkansas 9,648 9,648 9,648 10,841 11,213 11,664 1990-2015 California 225,550 225,550 225,550 225,845

  15. Commercial Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3,102,593 3,155,319 2,894,926 3,295,301 3,466,600 3,205,756 1930-2015 Alabama 27,071 25,144 21,551 25,324 27,515 24,519 1967-2015 Alaska 15,920 19,399 19,898 18,694 17,925 19,281 1967-2015 Arizona 31,945 32,633 31,530 32,890 30,456 30,537 1967-2015 Arkansas 40,232 39,986 41,435 47,636 50,673 46,160 1967-2015 California 247,997 246,141 253,148 254,845 237,675 238,477 1967-2015 Colorado 57,658 55,843 51,795 58,787 58,008 NA 1967-2015 Connecticut 40,656 44,832 42,346 46,418 51,221 53,378 1967-2015

  16. Vehicle Fuel Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,996 2,996 2,900 2,996 2,900 2,996 1997-2015 Alabama 19 19 18 19 18 19 2010-2015 Alaska 1 1 1 1 1 1 2010-2015 Arizona 173 173 167 173 167 173 2010-2015 Arkansas 3 3 3 3 3 3 2010-2015 California 1,408 1,408 1,363 1,408 1,363 1,408 2010-2015 Colorado 27 27 26 27 26 27 2010-2015 Connecticut 5 5 4 5 4 5 2010-2015 Delaware 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2015 District of Columbia 86 86 83 86 83 86 2010-2015 Florida 18 18 17 18 17 18 2010-2015 Georgia 99 99 96 99 96 99 2010-2015 Hawaii 1 1 1 1 1 1 2010-2015 Idaho

  17. Industrial Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6,167,371 6,826,192 6,994,120 7,226,215 7,425,452 7,623,826 1997-2014 Alabama 131,228 144,938 153,358 171,729 179,511 187,661 1997-2014 Alaska 6,635 6,408 6,769 6,357 4,065 4,847...

  18. Industrial Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    574,422 590,889 597,420 576,698 611,594 636,533 2001-2015 Alabama 14,619 15,749 15,311 14,897 15,292 15,100 2001-2015 Alaska 352 359 375 323 348 354 2001-2015 Arizona 1,481 1,468...

  19. Working Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Monthly Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 View History U.S. 2,935,089 3,252,232 3,624,564 3,953,070 3,937,654 3,677,200 1973-2015 Alabama 21,501 20,444 22,861 23,276 24,493 24,742 1995-2015 Alaska 24,528 24,635 24,543 24,595 24,461 24,319 2013-2015 Arkansas 2,151 2,553 2,694 2,222 2,132 1,808 1990-2015 California 314,527 312,769 319,349 337,762

  20. Electric Power Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6,872,533 7,387,184 7,573,863 9,110,793 8,190,756 8,149,111 1997-2014 Alabama 227,015 281,722 342,841 401,306 333,897 345,102 1997-2014 Alaska 38,078 39,732 41,738 39,758 33,944...

  1. Dry Natural Gas Estimated Production (Summary)

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    1,594 22,239 23,555 24,912 25,233 26,611 1977-2014 Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico 1992-2007 Alabama 254 223 218 214 175 176 1977-2014 Alaska 358 317 327 299 285 304 1977-2014...

  2. Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    20,964,665 22,127,046 22,467,053 23,411,423 23,838,925 24,362,131 1997-2014 Alabama 418,677 496,051 558,116 622,359 573,981 599,473 1997-2014 Alaska 81,335 80,794 88,178 87,404...

  3. Natural Gas Weekly Update

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    . Home | Petroleum | Gasoline | Diesel | Propane | Natural Gas | Electricity | Coal | Nuclear Renewables | Alternative Fuels | Prices | States | International | Country Analysis...

  4. Natural Gas Weekly Update

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 . Home | Petroleum | Gasoline | Diesel | Propane | Natural Gas | Electricity | Coal | Nuclear Renewables | Alternative Fuels |...

  5. DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For June 15 to July 5, 2010

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 2010. Idaho Cleanup Project Nothing to report. Operational Summary Decontamination and Decommissioning Work: At the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center, the last...

  6. DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For April 6 to April 19, 2010

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    the energized wire. (EM-ID-CWI-IWTU-2010-0003). Operational Summary Decontamination and Decommissioning: Activities continue at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering...

  7. DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For March 8 to March 22, 2010

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    D-CWI-BIC-2010-0003). Operational Summary Decommissioning Activities: Decontamination and decommissioning crews continued work at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering...

  8. Grout Isolation and Stabilization of Structures and Materials within Nuclear Facilities at the U.S. Department of Energy, Hanford Site, Summary - 12309

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Phillips, S.J.; Phillips, M.; Etheridge, D.; Chojnacki, D.W.; Herzog, C.B.; Matosich, B.J.; Steffen, J.M.; Sterling, R.T.; Flaucher, R.H.; Lloyd, E.R.

    2012-07-01

    Per regulatory agreement and facility closure design, U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site nuclear fuel cycle structures and materials require in situ isolation in perpetuity and/or interim physicochemical stabilization as a part of final disposal or interim waste removal, respectively. To this end, grout materials are being used to encase facilities structures or are being incorporated within structures containing hazardous and radioactive contaminants. Facilities where grout materials have been recently used for isolation and stabilization include: (1) spent fuel separations, (2) uranium trioxide calcining, (3) reactor fuel storage basin, (4) reactor fuel cooling basin transport rail tanker cars and casks, (5) cold vacuum drying and reactor fuel load-out, and (6) plutonium fuel metal finishing. Grout components primarily include: (1) portland cement, (2) fly ash, (3) aggregate, and (4) chemical admixtures. Mix designs for these typically include aggregate and non aggregate slurries and bulk powders. Placement equipment includes: (1) concrete piston line pump or boom pump truck for grout slurry, (2) progressive cavity and shearing vortex pump systems, and (3) extendable boom fork lift for bulk powder dry grout mix. Grout slurries placed within the interior of facilities were typically conveyed utilizing large diameter slick line and the equivalent diameter flexible high pressure concrete conveyance hose. Other facilities requirements dictated use of much smaller diameter flexible grout conveyance hose. Placement required direct operator location within facilities structures in most cases, whereas due to radiological dose concerns, placement has also been completed remotely with significant standoff distances. Grout performance during placement and subsequent to placement often required unique design. For example, grout placed in fuel basin structures to serve as interim stabilization materials required sufficient bearing i.e., unconfined compressive strength, to sustain heavy equipment yet, low breakout force to permit efficient removal by track hoe bucket or equivalent construction equipment. Further, flow of slurries through small orifice geometries of moderate head pressures was another typical design requirement. Phase separation of less than 1 percent was a typical design requirement for slurries. On the order of 30,000 cubic meters of cementitious grout have recently been placed in the above noted U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site facilities or structures. Each has presented a unique challenge in mix design, equipment, grout injection or placement, and ultimate facility or structure performance. Unconfined compressive and shear strength, flow, density, mass attenuation coefficient, phase separation, air content, wash-out, parameters and others, unique to each facility or structure, dictate the grout mix design for each. Each mix design was tested under laboratory and scaled field conditions as a precursor to field deployment. Further, after injection or placement of each grout formulation, the material was field inspected either by standard laboratory testing protocols, direct physical evaluation, or both. (authors)

  9. March 10, 2011 meeting summary | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    March 10, 2011 meeting summary March 10, 2011 meeting summary American Nuclear Insurers provided an overview of the private insurance program which provides third party liability financial protection for nuclear power plant operators and supporting entities. Insurance concepts were presented and contrasted against obligations stemming from international treaties. Underwriting considerations employed in the evaluation of insurance risk were explained. ANI provided further background on its

  10. ARM - Mission Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Mission Summary Related Links ISDAC Home AAF Home AVP Aircraft Instrumentation, October 14-16, 2008 ARM Data Discovery Browse Data Post-Campaign Data Sets Flight Summary Table (PDF, 440K) ISDAC Wiki Mission Summary Journal Deployment Resources NSA Site ARM Data Plots Quick Links Experiment Planning ISDAC Proposal Abstract Full Proposal (pdf, 1,735K) Science Questions Science Overview Document for ISDAC (pdf, 525K) ISDAC Flight Planning Document (PDF, 216K) Collaborations Logistics Measurements

  11. CBECS 1995 - Executive Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Executive Summary The Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) collects information on physical characteristics of commercial buildings, building use and occupancy...

  12. Operating Experience Summaries

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security (AU) Office of Analysis publishes the Operating Experience Summary to exchange lessons-learned information between DOE facilities.

  13. Pinellas Remediation Agreement Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended Florida Air and Water Pollution Control Act Scope Summary Remediation of property adjacent to the former ...

  14. Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors Utility...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors Utility Requirements Document Small Modular Reactors Inclusion Summary Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors ...

  15. Nuclear | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    High construction costs for nuclear plants, especially relative to natural-gas-fired plants, make other options for new nuclear capacity uneconomical even in the alternative...

  16. Microsoft PowerPoint - TWCB Summary Aug12r1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Summary Tank Waste Corporate Board Summary www.em.doe.gov 1 Tank Waste Corporate Board Summary Tank Waste Corporate Board Summary Ken Picha, Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Tank Waste & Nuclear Material Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting Tank Waste Corporate Board Meeting August 1 August 1- -2, 2012 < > Idaho Falls 2, 2012 < > Idaho Falls TWCB Meeting Overview August 1-2, 2012 meeting in Idaho Falls 41 participants from HQ and Field; DOE, Contractors, and Labs * EM-20,

  17. State Nuclear Profiles - Energy Information Administration

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Nuclear & Uranium Glossary › FAQS › Overview Data Status of U.S. Nuclear Outages (interactive) Summary Uranium & nuclear fuel Nuclear power plants Spent nuclear fuel International All nuclear data reports Analysis & Projections Major Topics Most popular Nuclear plants and reactors Projections Recurring Uranium All reports Browse by Tag Alphabetical Frequency Tag Cloud ‹ See all Nuclear Reports State Nuclear Profiles Data for 2010 (See also State Electricity Profiles) | Release

  18. Building Technologies Program Planning Summary | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Technologies Program Planning Summary Building Technologies Program Planning Summary This is a summary of the U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Program plans for conducting research and development of energy-efficient buildings in the United States. PDF icon btp_planning.pdf More Documents & Publications Before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Microsoft PowerPoint - 06 Crawley Drive for Net Zero Energy Commercial Buildings Before the House Transportation and

  19. PPO Benefit Summary | Argonne National Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Summary Download a summary of benefits offered in our PPO health insurance option. PDF icon 2015 PPO Summary...

  20. Natural Gas Weekly Update

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    Price, West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil Spot Price, and Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot Price Graph More Summary Data Prices Prices increased at all trading locations during the week,...

  1. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JANUARY 2016

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    6 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - April 2016 Page 1 News Updates  The Tennessee Valley Authority has completed fuel loading of the Watts Bar Unit 2 reactor. TVA plans to begin commercial operation of the 1,150 MW reactor in early 2016 following completion of power ascension testing.  The final environmental impact statement for the PSEG Early Site Permit (ESP) has been completed; an ESP could be issued as early as mid- 2016. If approved, the permit will be valid for

  2. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JANUARY 2016

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    South Texas Project TX ABWR 2 2 92007 112907 - Completed Completed Duke Energy William States Lee SC AP1000 2 121307 22508 - Ph. B Completed Florida Power and Light Turkey ...

  3. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JANUARY 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... B Completed Florida Power and Light Turkey Point FL AP1000 2 63009 9409 - Ph. A Ph. 2 PPL (UniStar) Bell Bend PA US-EPR 1 101008 121908 - Ph. A Ph. 2 Dominion Energy North ...

  4. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    South Texas Project TX ABWR 2 2 92007 112907 - Ph. 6 Completed Duke Energy William States Lee SC AP1000 2 121307 22508 - Ph. B Completed Florida Power and Light Turkey ...

  5. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY APRIL 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... B Completed Florida Power and Light Turkey Point FL AP1000 2 63009 9409 - Ph. A Ph. 3 PPL (UniStar) Bell Bend PA US-EPR 1 101008 121908 - Ph. A Ph. 2 Dominion Energy North ...

  6. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2014

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    B Completed Florida Power and Light Turkey Point FL AP1000 2 63009 9409 - Ph. A Ph. 2 PPL (UniStar) Bell Bend PA US-EPR 1 101008 121908 - Ph. A Ph. 2 Dominion Energy North ...

  7. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY APRIL 2015

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    5 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - April 2015 Page 1 News Updates  SCANA corporation has filed a petition with the Public Service Commission of South Carolina seeking an update to the construction schedule for V.C. Summer units 2 and 3. Revised estimates for substantial completion ("without consideration of all mitigating strategies") now stand at June 2019 and June 2020. Primary reasons for the delay included issues with submodule design and fabrication. 

  8. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JANUARY 2015

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    5 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - April 2015 Page 1 News Updates  The NRC has scheduled a public Commissioner's hearing for February 4 on DTE Electric's application for a combined license to build and operate a General Electric Hitachi Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) at the Enrico Fermi Generating Station near Newport, Michigan. This is the third time an applicant has reached the "final step" in the part 52 reactor licensing process.  The

  9. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY OCTOBER 2014

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    4 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - January 2015 Page 1 News Updates  The NRC has approved a final rule on the continued storage of spent fuel and has lifted a two year suspension on final licensing actions on plant licenses and license renewals. The rule incorporates a Generic Environmental Impact Statement that can be referenced by the environmental reviews for site licenses.  The NRC has published the final rule certifying the General Electric-Hitachi Economic

  10. Environmental Monitoring Summary - Entombed Hallam Nuclear Pow

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  11. Draft Meeting Summary Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Meeting Summary Page 1 Public Involvement and Communication Committee June 9, 2015 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE June 9, 2015 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Opening ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 TPA Public Involvement

  12. 2006 EMAB Recommendation Summary | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    EMAB Recommendation Summary 2006 EMAB Recommendation Summary This document is a summary of the 2006 EMAB Recommendations. PDF icon 2006 EMAB Recommendation Summary More Documents &...

  13. 2011 NTSF Meeting Summary | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NTSF Meeting Summary 2011 NTSF Meeting Summary PDF icon 2011 NTSF Meeting Summary More Documents & Publications NTSF Spring 2011 Agenda Meeting Summary Notes Overview for Newcomers

  14. Major Contracts Summary | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Contracts Summary Major Contracts Summary PDF icon Major Contracts Summary More Documents & Publications Energy Savings Performance Contracts Summary Chapter 16 - Types of Contracts

  15. Implementing Arrangement Between the U.S. Department of Energy and the Department of Natural Resources of Canada and Atomic Energy of Canada Limited For Collaboration in the Area of Nuclear Research

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Implementing Arrangement Between the U.S. Department of Energy and the Department of Natural Resources of Canada and Atomic Energy of Canada Limited For Collaboration in the Area of Nuclear Research

  16. Summaries of physical research in the geosciences

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1986-09-01

    The summaries in this document describe the scope of the individual programs and detail the research performed during 1984-1985. The Geosciences Research Program includes research in geology, petrology, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrology, solar-terrestrial relationships, aeronomy, seismology, and natural resource analysis, including their various subdivisions and interdisciplinary areas.

  17. Biofuels: Project summaries

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-07-01

    The US DOE, through the Biofuels Systems Division (BSD) is addressing the issues surrounding US vulnerability to petroleum supply. The BSD goal is to develop technologies that are competitive with fossil fuels, in both cost and environmental performance, by the end of the decade. This document contains summaries of ongoing research sponsored by the DOE BSD. A summary sheet is presented for each project funded or in existence during FY 1993. Each summary sheet contains and account of project funding, objectives, accomplishments and current status, and significant publications.

  18. Final Meeting Summary Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9, 2012 FINAL MEETING SUMMARY HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD RIVER AND PLATEAU COMMITTEE August 9, 2012 Richland, WA Topics in this Meeting Summary Opening ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Committee Business ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Attachments

  19. Conference summary: Experimnetal

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Thommpson, J.D.

    1995-12-31

    The conference is the 1995 International Conference on Strongly Correlated Electron Systems. The summary highlights research on the ``extended`` Doniach model, Kondo insulators, borocarbide superconductors, oxides (including cuprates), other phase transitions, and new materials.

  20. Compilation of ETR Summaries

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    External Technical Review Summaries Office of Technology Innovation and Development Office of Environmental Management November 2011 External Technical Review Summaries Number Title Report Date ETR-1 Flowsheet for the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) March 2006 ETR-2 Tank 48 at the Savannah River Site (SRS) August 2006 ETR-3 Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System (DBVS) for Low Activity Waste (LAW) at Hanford September 2006 ETR-4 Salt Waste Processing Facility Design at the Savannah River

  1. Nevada Test Site Summary 2006 (Volume 2)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cathy Wills

    2007-10-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) directs the management and operation of the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The NTS is the nation's historical testing site for nuclear weapons from 1951 through 1992 and is currently the nation's unique site for ongoing national-security-related missions and high-risk operations. NNSA/NSO strives to provide to the public an understanding of the current activities on the NTS, including environmental monitoring and compliance activities aimed at protecting the public and the environment from radiation hazards and from nonradiological impacts. This document is a summary of the Nevada Test Site Environmental Report (NTSER) for calendar year 2006 (see attached compact disc on inside back cover). The NTSER is a comprehensive report of environmental activities performed at the NTS and its satellite facilities over the previous calendar year. It is prepared annually to meet the requirements and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the information needs of NNSA/NSO stakeholders. To provide an abbreviated and more readable version of the NTSER, this summary report is produced. This summary does not include detailed data tables, monitoring methods or design, a description of the NTS environment, or a discussion of all environmental program activities performed throughout the year. The reader may obtain a hard copy of the full NTSER as directed on the inside front cover of this summary report.

  2. Nevada Test Site Environmental Report 2007 Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cathy Wills

    2008-09-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) directs the management and operation of the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The NTS is the nation's historical testing site for nuclear weapons from 1951 through 1992 and is currently the nation's unique site for ongoing national-security related missions and high-risk operations. NNSA/NSO strives to provide to the public an understanding of the current activities on the NTS, including environmental monitoring and compliance activities aimed at protecting the public and the environment from radiation hazards and from nonradiological impacts. This document is a summary of the Nevada Test Site Environmental Report (NTSER) for calendar year 2007 (see attached compact disc on inside back cover). The NTSER is a comprehensive report of environmental activities performed at the NTS and offsite facilities over the previous calendar year. It is prepared annually to meet the requirements and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the information needs of NNSA/NSO stakeholders. To provide an abbreviated and more readable version of the NTSER, this summary report is produced. This summary does not include detailed data tables, monitoring methods or design, a description of the NTS environment, or a discussion of all environmental program activities performed throughout the year. The reader may obtain a hard copy of the full NTSER as directed on the inside front cover of this summary report.

  3. Nevada Test Site Environmental Summary Report 2006

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cathy Wills

    2007-10-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) directs the management and operation of the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The NTS is the nation's historical testing site for nuclear weapons from 1951 through 1992 and is currently the nation's unique site for ongoing national-security related missions and high-risk operations. NNSA/NSO strives to provide to the public an understanding of the current activities on the NTS, including environmental monitoring and compliance activities aimed at protecting the public and the environment from radiation hazards and from nonradiological impacts. This document is a summary of the Nevada Test Site Environmental Report (NTSER) for calendar year 2006 (see attached compact disc on inside back cover). The NTSER is a comprehensive report of environmental activities performed at the NTS and its satellite facilities over the previous calendar year. It is prepared annually to meet the requirements and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the information needs of NNSA/NSO stakeholders. To provide an abbreviated and more readable version of the NTSER, this summary report is produced. This summary does not include detailed data tables, monitoring methods or design, a description of the NTS environment, or a discussion of all environmental program activities performed throughout the year. The reader may obtain a hard copy of the full NTSER as directed on the inside front cover of this summary report.

  4. AEO2015 Coal Working Group Meeting Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    AS AEO2015 MODELING ASSUMPTIONS AND INPUTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 1 July 30, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis FROM: Coal and Uranium Analysis Team SUBJECT: AEO2015 Coal Working Group Meeting I Summary Attendees (39) Name Affiliation Greg Adams (Moderator) US DOE: EIA Jim Diefenderfer Tyler Hodge Elias Johnson Ayaka Jones Eric Krall Laura Martin Mike Mellish Kate

  5. Hanford Site C Tank Farm Meeting Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    6 Summary Notes from 24- 25 February 2009 Office of River Protection Waste Management Area C Performance Assessment Input Meeting Attendees: Representatives from Department of Energy-Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP), DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL), DOE-Headquarters (DOE-HQ), the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), met at the Ecology offices in Richland, Washington on 24 & 25 February 2009. EPA Region X staff

  6. FY 2008 Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration 8 Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  7. FY 2009 Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration 9 Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact

  8. FY 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo

  9. FY 2011 Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo

  10. STEP Participant Survey Executive Summary

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    STEP Participant Survey Executive Summary, from the Tool Kit Framework: Small Town University Energy Program (STEP).

  11. ICEIWG Meeting Agendas and Summaries

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Download meeting agendas and summaries from the Indian Country Energy and Infrastructure Working Group (ICEIWG).

  12. Microsoft Word - Summary.doc

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Summary v TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... v List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................................. vi List of Tables

  13. Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities Summary Report on Industrial and Regulatory Engagement Activities The Advanced Instrumentation, Information, and Control (II&C) Systems Technologies pathway of the Light Water Reactor Sustainability(LWRS) Program conducts a vigorous engagement strategy with the U.S. nuclear power industry, including the nuclear operating companies, major support organizations, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and

  14. Safeguards Options for Natural Uranium Conversion Facilities ? A Collaborative Effort between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Nuclear Energy Commission of Brazil (CNEN)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Raffo-Caiado, Ana Claudia; Begovich, John M; Ferrada, Juan J

    2008-01-01

    In 2005, the National Nuclear Energy Commission of Brazil (CNEN) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) agreed on a collaborative effort to evaluate measures that can strengthen the effectiveness of international safeguards at a natural uranium conversion plant (NUCP). The work was performed by DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory and CNEN. A generic model of an NUCP was developed and typical processing steps were defined. The study, completed in early 2007, identified potential safeguards measures and evaluated their effectiveness and impacts on operations. In addition, advanced instrumentation and techniques for verification purposes were identified and investigated. The scope of the work was framed by the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA's) 2003 revised policy concerning the starting point of safeguards at uranium conversion facilities. Before this policy, only the final products of the uranium conversion plant were considered to be of composition and purity suitable for use in the nuclear fuel cycle and, therefore, subject to AEA safeguards control. DOE and CNEN have explored options for implementing the IAEA policy, although Brazil understands that the new policy established by the IAEA is beyond the framework of the Quadripartite Agreement of which it is one of the parties, together with Argentina, the Brazilian-Argentine Agency for Accounting and Control of Nuclear Materials, and the IAEA. This paper highlights the findings of this joint collaborative effort and identifies technical measures to strengthen international safeguards in NUCPs.

  15. Decision Summaries | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Information Center » Decision Summaries Decision Summaries January 1, 2016 Summary of Decisions - December 28, 2015 - January 1, 2016 Decisions were issued on: - Whistleblower Protection (10 CFR Part 708) December 25, 2015 Summary of Decisions - December 21, 2015 - December 25, 2015 Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal December 18, 2015 Summary of Decisions - December 14, 2015 - December 18, 2015 Decisions were issued on: -

  16. Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Municipal Fleets...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Municipal Fleets Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Municipal Fleets...

  17. Guidelines for Conversion of Diesel Buses to Compressed Natural...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Conversion of Diesel Buses to Compressed Natural Gas Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Guidelines for Conversion of Diesel Buses to Compressed Natural Gas...

  18. Natural Gas Vehicle Incentive Program | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Vehicle Incentive Program Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Natural Gas Vehicle Incentive Program AgencyCompany Organization: Natural Gas Vehicles for...

  19. Nature Conservancy-Climate Wizard | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Conservancy-Climate Wizard Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Nature Conservancy-Climate Wizard AgencyCompany Organization: The Nature Conservancy Sector:...

  20. Summary of Emergency Management Results from Pilot Evaluations | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Summary of Emergency Management Results from Pilot Evaluations Summary of Emergency Management Results from Pilot Evaluations September 19th, 2012 Presenter: David Freshwater, Emergency Management Specialist, Office of Emergency Management, National Nuclear Security Administration Topics covered: Confirm that Critical Safety Function scenarios were addressed in HS/EPHA Determine whether site/facility had robust capabilities that allow flexible and effective emergency response to