National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for nuclear summary natural

  1. Wisconsin Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.14 5.65 4.88 4.88 6.96 4.71 1984-2015 Residential 10.34 9.77 9.27 8.65 10.52 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 8.53 8.03 7.34 6.94 8.74 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 7.56 7.05 5.81 6.02 8.08 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 7.84 6.10 5.71 1989-2012 Electric Power 5.43 4.91 3.27 4.47 5.47 W 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1973 Withdrawals 1974-1975 Net Withdrawals 1973-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions

  2. Connecticut Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    67-2005 Citygate 6.58 5.92 5.12 5.42 5.61 4.07 1984-2015 Residential 14.93 13.83 14.17 13.32 14.13 12.47 1967-2015 Commercial 9.55 8.48 8.40 9.20 10.24 8.56 1967-2015 Industrial 9.60 9.16 8.83 6.85 8.07 6.37 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 16.31 18.59 13.70 1992-2012 Electric Power 5.70 5.09 3.99 6.23 6.82 4.73 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1996 Withdrawals 1973-1996 Net Withdrawals 1973-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 651 655 743 558

  3. Delaware Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    78-2005 Citygate 5.67 9.03 7.19 5.67 5.54 NA 1984-2015 Residential 15.12 15.38 15.24 13.65 13.21 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 13.26 13.58 13.31 11.78 11.42 10.70 1967-2015 Industrial 10.18 11.69 11.61 11.24 10.95 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 24.55 28.76 30.97 1995-2012 Electric Power W W -- -- W -- 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1967-1975 Withdrawals 1967-1975 Net Withdrawals 1967-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 73 64 117 63 157 1980-2014

  4. FY 2009 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary |...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    FY 2009 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2009 SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % ...

  5. FY 2011 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary |...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    FY 2011 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2011 SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % ...

  6. FY 2010 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary |...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    FY 2010 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2010 SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % ...

  7. FY 2012 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary |...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    12 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2012 SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % ...

  8. FY 2010 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary |...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    0 Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2010 SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % ...

  9. ,"New Jersey Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    "Date","New Jersey Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Natural Gas Citygate Price in New Jersey (Dollars per ...

  10. ,"New Hampshire Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...","N3010NH3","N3020NH3","N3035NH3","N3045NH3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in New Hampshire (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","New Hampshire Price of Natural Gas Delivered ...

  11. ,"New Jersey Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...J3","N3035NJ3","N3045NJ3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in New Jersey (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","New Jersey Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers ...

  12. ,"New Mexico Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...0NM3","N3035NM3","NA1570SNM3","N3045NM3" "Date","New Mexico Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","New Mexico Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use ...

  13. ,"New York Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...NY3","N3035NY3","N3045NY3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in New York (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","New York Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers ...

  14. ,"New York Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...20NY3","N3035NY3","NA1570SNY3","N3045NY3" "Date","New York Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","New York Natural Gas Imports Price (Dollars per Thousand ...

  15. ,"New Mexico Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...M3","N3035NM3","N3045NM3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in New Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","New Mexico Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers ...

  16. ,"North Carolina Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...,"N3035NC3","N3045NC3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in North Carolina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","North Carolina Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential ...

  17. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administrat...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    National Nuclear Security Administration 2012 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and...

  18. ,"New Hampshire Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...NH3","N3050NH3","N3010NH3","N3020NH3","N3035NH3","NA1570SNH3","N3045NH3" "Date","New Hampshire Natural Gas Imports Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Price of New ...

  19. Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure ...

  20. New Jersey Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.41 7.53 6.74 6.21 6.21 4.87 1984-2015 Residential 12.84 11.78 11.09 10.89 9.69 8.37 1967-2015 Commercial 10.11 9.51 8.50 9.55 10.08 8.52 1967-2015 Industrial 9.63 9.23 7.87 8.19 10.45 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1994-2012 Electric Power 5.66 5.24 3.63 4.34 4.83 2.96 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1967-1996 Withdrawals 1967-1996 Net Withdrawals 1967-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet)

  1. North Carolina Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.02 5.45 4.00 4.63 5.41 3.81 1984-2015 Residential 12.50 12.55 12.19 11.83 11.88 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 10.18 9.64 8.62 8.81 9.12 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 8.24 7.70 6.37 6.87 7.55 6.03 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 9.77 12.13 6.48 1990-2012 Electric Power W W W W 6.05 W 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1996 Withdrawals 1974-1996 Net Withdrawals 1973-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 4,410

  2. Rhode Island Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10.05 8.22 4.11 4.01 4.03 3.14 1984-2015 Residential 16.48 15.33 14.29 14.55 15.14 14.23 1967-2015 Commercial 14.46 13.33 12.31 12.37 12.89 11.97 1967-2015 Industrial 12.13 10.98 9.78 9.04 10.27 9.26 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 11.71 8.61 16.32 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.45 5.10 3.98 5.84 W W 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1996 Withdrawals 1973-1996 Net Withdrawals 1973-1996 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 468 430 517 624 0 1980-2014

  3. South Carolina Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6.17 5.67 4.57 5.11 5.22 3.90 1984-2015 Residential 13.01 12.93 13.25 12.61 12.65 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 10.34 9.68 8.67 9.10 9.55 8.37 1967-2015 Industrial 6.12 5.60 4.30 5.27 6.13 4.39 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 11.16 8.85 9.77 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Underground Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Injections 1973-1975 Withdrawals 1973-1975 Net Withdrawals 1973-1975 Liquefied Natural Gas Storage (Million Cubic Feet) Additions 1,360 1,386 391 879 1,371 1980-2014 Withdrawals 1,574

  4. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy (NE) | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Nuclear Energy (NE) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy (NE) The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 ...

  5. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy | Department...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Nuclear Energy 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within ...

  6. Nuclear Energy Innovation Workshops. Executive Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Allen, Todd; Jackson, John; Hildebrandt, Phil; Baker, Suzy

    2015-06-01

    The nuclear energy innovation workshops were organized and conducted by INL on March 2-4, 2015 at the five NUC universities and Boise State University. The output from these workshops is summarized with particular attention to final summaries that were provided by technical leads at each of the workshops. The current revision includes 3-4 punctuation corrections and a correction of the month of release from May to June.

  7. Nuclear Energy In the United States Executive Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    0 Status and Outlook for Nuclear Energy In the United States Executive Summary The U.S. nuclear power industry continues to make pro- gress toward the construction of new nuclear...

  8. National Nuclear Security Administration Appropriation and Program Summary Tables

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    of 34 National Nuclear Security Administration Appropriation and Program Summary Tables Outyear Appropriation Summary Tables FY 2012 BUDGET TABLES National Nuclear Security Administration Overview Appropriation Summary Outyear Appropriation Summary NNSA Future-Years Nuclear Security Program (FYNSP) $ % $ % National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator 420,754 448,267 420,754 450,060 29,306 7.0% 1,793 0.4% Weapons Activities 6,386,371 7,008,835 7,008,835 7,629,716 1,243,345

  9. Nuclear Safety Research and Development Status Workshop Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NSR&D STATUS WORKSHOP SUMMARIES Caroline Garzon Chief of Nuclear Safety Staff NUCLEAR SAFETY R&D Perform a peer review of Risk Assessment Corporation WTP analysis by a team and ...

  10. Summary of nuclear fuel reprocessing activities around the world

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mellinger, P.J.; Harmon, K.M.; Lakey, L.T.

    1984-11-01

    This review of international practices for nuclear fuel reprocessing was prepared to provide a nontechnical summary of the current status of nuclear fuel reprocessing activities around the world. The sources of information are widely varied.

  11. Summary of Prometheus Radiation Shielding Nuclear Design Analysis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    J. Stephens

    2006-01-13

    This report transmits a summary of radiation shielding nuclear design studies performed to support the Prometheus project. Together, the enclosures and references associated with this document describe NRPCT (KAPL & Bettis) shielding nuclear design analyses done for the project.

  12. Summary Pamphlet, Nuclear Safety at the Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This pamphlet is intended to provide an abbreviated summary of regulatory requirements and processes for ensuring nuclear safety at DOE, which serve as the Department’s overarching regulatory framework for nuclear safety.

  13. Summary, Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development Plan |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Summary, Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development Plan Summary, Long-Term Nuclear Technology Research and Development Plan In 1998, DOE established the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee (NERAC) to provide advice to the Secretary and to the Director, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology (NE), on the broad range of non-defense DOE nuclear technology programs. The NERAC recommended development of a long-range R&D program. This R&D

  14. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, April 2012 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    April 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, April 2012 April 30, 2012 - 12:31pm Addthis Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary The U.S. NRC voted to approve the issuance of the COLs for Southern Nuclear's Vogtle Units 3 and 4 on February 9, 2012. The issuance marks the first COL ever to be issued and the construction of a new nuclear power plant in more than 30 years. SCE&G's V.C Summer Units 2 and 3 received approval for COLs on March 30, 2012, making them the second US new-build in 30

  15. Natural Gas: A Preliminary Summary 1998

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    1999-01-01

    This special report provides preliminary natural gas data for 1998 which were reported on monthly surveys of the industry through December.

  16. Natural Gas: A Preliminary Summary 1999

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2000-01-01

    This special report provides preliminary natural gas data for 1999 which were reported on monthly surveys of the industry through December.

  17. ,"U.S. Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ...S3","N9133US3","N3050US3","N3010US3","N3020US3","N3035US3","N3045US3" "Date","U.S. Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Price of U.S. Natural Gas Imports ...

  18. Microsoft Word - Nuclear_Astrophysics_Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    and ATLAS S. Almaraz-Calderon (ANL): Fusion Reactions in Nuclear Astrophysics: The MUSIC Approach P. Collon (Notre Dame): AMS for astrophysics, p-process work and other...

  19. Summary: U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Summary: U.S. Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves 2009 November 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Oil, Gas, and Coal Supply...

  20. FY 2012 Sandia Corporation PER Summary | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) Sandia Corporation PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2012 SANDIA CORPORATION AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % $27,799,114 $27,093,336 97.5% Sandia Corporation, the management and operating contractor for Sandia National Laboratories, earned a "Very Good" rating in Program and Institutional Management and Business, a "Good" in Operations, and 97.5 percent of the possible incentive fee from the National Nuclear Security

  1. U.S. Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Imports 4.52 4.24 2.88 3.83 5.30 2.99 1985-2015 By Pipeline 4.46 4.09 2.79 3.73 5.21 2.84 1985-2015 As Liquefied Natural Gas 4.94 5.63 4.27 6.80 8.85 7.37 1985-2015 Exports 5.02 ...

  2. Nuclear Safety Workshop Summary | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    On September 19-20, 2012, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) held a second Nuclear Safety Workshop covering the results of the Department's actions to improve its posture for...

  3. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2014

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - October 2014 Page 1 News Updates  The NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) has ruled that Toshiba's participation in Nuclear Innovation North America's South Texas Project does not violate federal rules on foreign ownership, control or domination of nuclear reactors. NRC staff had previously stated that despite having only a 10% ownership stake in the project, Toshiba's level of financial support constituted an impermissible

  4. US nuclear power plant operating cost and experience summaries

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kohn, W.E.; Reid, R.L.; White, V.S.

    1998-02-01

    NUREG/CR-6577, U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Operating Cost and Experience Summaries, has been prepared to provide historical operating cost and experience information on U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. Cost incurred after initial construction are characterized as annual production costs, representing fuel and plant operating and maintenance expenses, and capital expenditures related to facility additions/modifications which are included in the plant capital asset base. As discussed in the report, annual data for these two cost categories were obtained from publicly available reports and must be accepted as having different degrees of accuracy and completeness. Treatment of inconclusive and incomplete data is discussed. As an aid to understanding the fluctuations in the cost histories, operating summaries for each nuclear unit are provided. The intent of these summaries is to identify important operating events; refueling, major maintenance, and other significant outages; operating milestones; and significant licensing or enforcement actions. Information used in the summaries is condensed from annual operating reports submitted by the licensees, plant histories contained in Nuclear Power Experience, trade press articles, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) web site (www.nrc.gov).

  5. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - October 2015 Page 1 News Updates  DTE Energy has received a license to build and operate an ESBWR light water reactor at its Fermi site in Newport, Michigan; the company has not committed to building a new plant, but is retaining the option for long-term planning purposes.  The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has voted to grant the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation authority to issue a full power operating license to Tennessee

  6. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY APRIL 2014

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - July 2014 Page 1 News Updates  On February 20, Secretary Moniz announced the issuance of loan guarantees totalling approximately $6.5 billion to Georgia Power Company and Oglethorpe Power Company for the construction of two new nuclear reactors at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant. The Department continues to work on the remaining conditional commitment for a $1.8 billion loan guarantee to Municipal Electric Authority of

  7. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JANUARY 2014

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 Updates available at: www.energy.gov/ne NEXT UPDATE - April 2014 Page 1 News Updates  Luminant has requested a suspension of the NRC's review of its Comanche Peak Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) application. The company cited impacts to the review schedule of the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries US Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (US- APWR) due to the vendor's desire to refocus its resources to reactor restarts in Japan as well as low electricity prices driven by low natural

  8. Summary of the psychological effects of tactical nuclear warfare

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sessions, G.R.

    1984-04-01

    The psychological component of the response of combat troops to tactical nuclear warfare is a troublesome variable which plagues military planners and commanders responsible for the preparation of the armed forces for the eventuality that nuclear weapons might one day be used in armed conflict. The devastating physical effects of nuclear weapons have been extensively documented and the biological response of animals and humans to radiation has also been well studied, but very little is known concerning the probable effects of experiencing a nuclear attack, upon the emotional stability, morale, and motivation of soldiers to perform their assigned duties. The literature addressing this topic has been reviewed and evaluated as part of the Defense Nuclear Agency's Intermediate Dose Program. A summary of the report resulting from this effort is presented herein. The full literature review and accompanying bibliography are available from the author upon request.

  9. SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND CHARACTERISTICS AT NUCLEAR FACILITY SITES

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Summary of Revised Tornado, Hurricane and Extreme Straight Wind Characteristics at Nuclear Facility Sites BY: John D. Stevenson Consulting Engineer

  10. Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors Utility Requirements Document Small Modular Reactors Inclusion Summary

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors Utility Requirements Document Small Modular Reactors Inclusion Summary November 2014

  11. Natural Resources Defense Council Consent Decree, May 26, 1988 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Decree No. 1:85-2583-6 State South Carolina Agreement Type Consent Decree Legal Driver(s) RCRA Scope Summary Establish guidelines for the closure of certain facilities at the Savannah River Plant. Parties DOE (SRP); State of South Carolina (Department of Health and Environmental Control); US DOJ; Natural Resources Defense Council; Energy Research Foundation; Assistant U.S. Attorney of the District of South Carolina; South Carolina League of Women Voters Date 5/26/1988 SCOPE * Establish

  12. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2013 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    January 2013 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2013 January 30, 2013 - 5:59pm Addthis Quarterly Updates On October 22 Dominion Resources Inc. announced that it would close and decommission its Kewaunee Power Station located in Carlton, Wis. after failing to find a buyer for the plant. The company said that the plant closure was a purely economic decision resulting from low projected wholesale electricity prices. Power production will cease in the second quarter of 2013. On November

  13. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, July 2012 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    July 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, July 2012 July 30, 2012 - 3:27pm Addthis Quarterly News The final ruling on the design certification for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' APWR has been revised until 2015. Structural changes were made to the design by vendor, which requires a new seismic analysis to be performed. Because of this, the review schedule for the COL applications for Comanche Peak and North Anna has been delayed by approximately 18 months. The final ruling on Areva's EPR

  14. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, October 2012 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    October 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, October 2012 October 30, 2012 - 8:58am Addthis Quarterly Updates On August 7, NRC issued an order halting issuance of any new construction licenses or license renewals until the Commission can respond to a June 8 court ruling striking down the NRC's waste confidence rule, which assumes that a waste repository will be available "when necessary"; reviews of license applications will continue and the order does not apply to design

  15. National briefing summaries: Nuclear fuel cycle and waste management

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schneider, K.J.; Bradley, D.J.; Fletcher, J.F.; Konzek, G.J.; Lakey, L.T.; Mitchell, S.J.; Molton, P.M.; Nightingale, R.E.

    1991-04-01

    Since 1976, the International Program Support Office (IPSO) at the Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) has collected and compiled publicly available information concerning foreign and international radioactive waste management programs. This National Briefing Summaries is a printout of an electronic database that has been compiled and is maintained by the IPSO staff. The database contains current information concerning the radioactive waste management programs (with supporting information on nuclear power and the nuclear fuel cycle) of most of the nations (except eastern European countries) that now have or are contemplating nuclear power, and of the multinational agencies that are active in radioactive waste management. Information in this document is included for three additional countries (China, Mexico, and USSR) compared to the prior issue. The database and this document were developed in response to needs of the US Department of Energy.

  16. National briefing summaries: Nuclear fuel cycle and waste management

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schneider, K.J.; Lakey, L.T.; Silviera, D.J.

    1988-12-01

    The National Briefing Summaries is a compilation of publicly available information concerning the nuclear fuel cycle and radioactive waste management strategies and programs of 21 nations, including the United States and three international agencies that have publicized their activities in this field. It presents available highlight information with references that may be used by the reader for additional information. The information in this document is compiled primarily for use by the US Department of Energy and other US federal agencies and their contractors to provide summary information on radioactive waste management activities in other countries. This document provides an awareness to managers and technical staff of what is occurring in other countries with regard to strategies, activities, and facilities. The information may be useful in program planning to improve and benefit United States' programs through foreign information exchange. Benefits to foreign exchange may be derived through a number of exchange activities.

  17. Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    January 2012 Quarterly Nuclear Deployment Summary, January 2012 January 30, 2012 - 1:10pm Addthis Quarterly News The U.S. NRC voted to approve the amended AP1000 design certification on December 22, 2011. The Commission also announced the rule would be effective immediately after it was published in the Federal Register on December 30, 2011. A final rule for the GE-ABWR design certification amendment was approved and published in the Federal Register on December 16, 2011. The rule will become

  18. Pena blanca natural analogue project: summary of activities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levy, Schon S; Goldstein, Steven J; Abdel - Fattah, Amr I

    2010-12-08

    The inactive Nopal I uranium mine in silicic tuff north of Chihuahua City, Chihuahua, Mexico, was studied as a natural analogue for an underground nuclear-waste repository in the unsaturated zone. Site stratigraphy was confirmed from new drill core. Datafrom site studies include chemical and isotopic compositions of saturated- and unsaturated-zone waters. A partial geochronology of uranium enrichment and mineralization was established. Evidence pertinent to uranium-series transport in the soil zone and changing redox conditions was collected. The investigations contributed to preliminary, scoping-level performance assessment modeling.

  19. Pena Blanca Natural Analogue Project: Summary of activities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levy, S.; Goldstein, S.; Dobson, P.F.; Goodell, P.; Ku, T.-L.; Abdel-Fattah, A.; Saulnier, G.; Fayek, M.; de la Garza, R.

    2011-02-01

    The inactive Nopal I uranium mine in silicic tuff north of Chihuahua City, Chihuahua, Mexico, was studied as a natural analogue for an underground nuclear-waste repository in the unsaturated zone. Site stratigraphy was confirmed from new drill cores. Data from site studies include chemical and isotopic compositions of saturated- and unsaturated-zone waters. A partial geochronology of uranium enrichment and mineralization was established. Evidence pertinent to uranium-series transport in the soil zone and changing redox conditions was collected. The investigations contributed to preliminary, scoping-level performance assessment modeling.

  20. FY 2007 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    FY 2007 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2007 BWXT PANTEX AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % 33,395,888 30,676,159 91.9% BWXT Pantex, the ...

  1. FY 2006 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    FY 2006 BWXT Pantex, LLC, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2006 BWXT PANTEX AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % 29,875,417 27,501,337 92.1% BWXT Pantex, the ...

  2. FY 2007 University of California, PER Summary | National Nuclear...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    FY 2007 University of California, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2007 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % 4,300,000 3,956,000 92% ...

  3. 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (NA-20)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

  4. FY 2012 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration | (NNSA) National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2012 NATIONAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % $29,855,764 $28,020,923 93.85% National Security Technologies, LLC, the management and operating contractor for the Nevada National Security Site, earned an "Excellent" rating in Program, a "Very Good" in Operations and Institutional and Business Management, and 93.85

  5. CA, Los Angeles Basin Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    91 92 102 98 90 84 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 91 92 102 98 ...

  6. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    gas is heavily used for power generation. Such conditions could cause a mid-year spike in prices to above 6 per MMBtu. With high natural gas prices, natural gas demand is...

  7. Mississippi Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    22 858 868 612 600 563 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 884 822 806 550 557 505 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease ...

  8. Miscellaneous Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    349 363 393 233 188 185 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 271 353 270 219 169 167 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease ...

  9. Montana Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    93 959 792 616 590 686 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 681 657 522 327 286 361 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease ...

  10. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    economy. In 2003, natural gas demand growth is expected across all sectors. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, July 2002 History Projections Apr-02 Ma May-02 Jun-02...

  11. New York Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    196 281 253 184 144 143 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 196 271 245 178 138 138 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 0 10 8 6 6 5 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 196 281 253 184 144 14

  12. Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Dec. 31 740 725 711 652 264 243 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 9 3 0 0 0 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 731 722 711 652 264 243 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 739 724 710 651 261 240

  13. Florida Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7 56 6 16 15 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 0 26 4 16 14 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 7 30 2 0 1 0 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 7 56 6 16 15 0

  14. 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program.

  15. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (NA-20)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (NA-20).

  16. ,"Illinois Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Summary" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Prices",5,"Monthly","6/2016","1/15/1989" ,"Data 2","Production",10,"Monthly","6/2016","1/15/1991" ,"Data 3","Underground

  17. ,"Iowa Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Summary" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Prices",5,"Monthly","6/2016","1/15/1989" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",7,"Monthly","6/2016","1/15/1990" ,"Data

  18. Ohio Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    896 832 758 1,235 3,201 7,193 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 799 742 684 1,012 2,887 6,985 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 97 90 74 223 314 208 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 896 832 758 1,233 3,161 6,72

  19. Oklahoma Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    24,207 28,182 29,937 28,714 28,900 34,319 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 23,115 26,873 27,683 25,018 24,370 27,358 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,092 1,309 2,254 3,696 4,530 6,961 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 22,769 26,345 27,830 26,599 26,873 31,778 1977-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1979-2008

  20. Pennsylvania Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,018 14,068 26,719 36,543 50,078 60,443 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,885 13,924 26,585 36,418 49,809 60,144 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 133 144 134 125 269 299 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 6,985 13,960 26,529 36,348 49,674 59,873 1977-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1979-1981

  1. Texas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    85,034 94,287 104,454 93,475 97,921 105,955 1981-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 76,272 84,157 90,947 74,442 75,754 79,027 1981-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 8,762 10,130 13,507 19,033 22,167 26,928 1981-2014 Dry Natural Gas 80,424 88,997 98,165 86,924 90,349 97,154 1981-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1981

  2. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    change the pattern of annual demand shifts reported in earlier Outlooks. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, December 2002 History Projections Sep-02 Oct-02 Nov-02...

  3. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    to increase because of accelerated economic growth and generally lower prices. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, October 2003 History Projections Jul-03 Aug-03 Sep-03...

  4. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    to increase because of accelerated economic growth and generally lower prices. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, November 2003 History Projections Aug-03 Sep-03 Oct-03...

  5. Michigan Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,805 2,975 2,549 1,781 1,839 1,873 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,728 2,903 2,472 1,687 1,714 1,765 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, ...

  6. West Virginia Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6,090 7,163 10,532 14,881 23,209 31,153 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,066 7,134 10,480 14,860 23,139 31,121 1979-2014 Natural Gas ...

  7. Kentucky Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,919 2,785 2,128 1,515 1,794 1,753 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,887 2,674 2,030 1,422 1,750 1,704 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, ...

  8. Utah Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,411 7,146 8,108 7,775 7,057 6,970 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,810 6,515 7,199 6,774 6,162 6,098 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, ...

  9. NM, East Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4,558 4,720 4,884 4,833 5,108 6,434 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,658 2,612 2,475 2,156 1,832 1,977 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, ...

  10. Alabama Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,948 2,724 2,570 2,304 1,670 2,121 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,919 2,686 2,522 2,204 1,624 1,980 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, ...

  11. Virginia Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3,091 3,215 2,832 2,579 2,373 2,800 1982-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,091 3,215 2,832 2,579 2,373 2,800 1982-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, ...

  12. Wyoming Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    36,748 36,526 36,930 31,636 34,576 28,787 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 36,386 36,192 36,612 30,930 33,774 27,507 1979-2014 Natural Gas ...

  13. Louisiana Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    30,545 22,135 20,389 23,258 1981-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 19,898 28,838 29,906 21,362 19,519 22,350 1981-2014 Natural Gas ...

  14. Kansas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3,500 3,937 3,747 3,557 3,772 4,606 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,417 3,858 3,620 3,231 3,339 3,949 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 83 79 127 326 433 657 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 3,279 3,673 3,486 3,308 3,592 4,359

  15. NM, West Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,086 11,809 11,254 9,720 9,459 9,992 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 12,004 11,704 11,111 9,578 9,322 9,766 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 82 105 143 142 137 226 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 11,457 11,186 10,626 9,200 8,943 9,484

  16. New Mexico Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6,644 16,529 16,138 14,553 14,567 16,426 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 14,662 14,316 13,586 11,734 11,154 11,743 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,982 2,213 2,552 2,819 3,413 4,683 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 15,598 15,412 15,005 13,586 13,576 15,283

  17. North Dakota Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ,213 1,869 2,652 3,974 6,081 6,787 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 143 152 141 105 91 45 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,070 1,717 2,511 3,869 5,990 6,742 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 1,079 1,667 2,381 3,569 5,420 6,034

  18. North Louisiana Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    17,273 26,136 27,411 18,467 17,112 19,837 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 17,220 26,063 27,313 18,385 16,933 19,645 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 53 73 98 82 179 192 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 17,143 26,030 27,337 18,418 17,044 19,722

  19. Alaska Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,183 8,917 9,511 9,667 7,383 6,805 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1,090 1,021 976 995 955 954 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 8,093 7,896 8,535 8,672 6,428 5,851 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 9,101 8,838 9,424 9,579 7,316 6,745

  20. Arkansas Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10,872 14,181 16,374 11,039 13,524 12,795 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 10,852 14,152 16,328 10,957 13,389 12,606 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 20 29 46 82 135 189 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 10,869 14,178 16,370 11,035 13,518 12,789

  1. California Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ,926 2,785 3,042 2,119 2,023 2,260 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 612 503 510 272 247 273 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 2,314 2,282 2,532 1,847 1,776 1,987 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,773 2,647 2,934 1,999 1,887 2,107

  2. Colorado Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4,081 25,372 26,151 21,674 23,533 21,992 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 22,199 23,001 23,633 18,226 19,253 16,510 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,882 2,371 2,518 3,448 4,280 5,482 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 23,058 24,119 24,821 20,666 22,381 20,851

  3. 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Nuclear Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Nuclear Energy has determined that no new EAs or EISs are expected to commence during the next 12 to 24-month period.

  4. Deep borehole disposal of nuclear waste summary. (Technical Report...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Sponsoring Org: USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Country of Publication: United States Language: English Word Cloud More Like This Full Text preview image File ...

  5. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    levels and 25 percent below the 5-year average. Natural gas prices are likely to stay high as long as above-normal storage injection demand competes with industrial and...

  6. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    2002). Natural gas prices were higher than expected in October as storms in the Gulf of Mexico in late September temporarily shut in some gas production, causing spot prices at...

  7. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    3.20 per MMBtu, which is about 0.84 higher than last winter's price. Domestic dry natural gas production is projected to fall by about 1.7 percent in 2002 compared with the...

  8. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    commercial sector demand are offset by lower demand in the electric power sector. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, September 2003 History Projections Jun-03 Jul-03 Aug-03...

  9. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    by 1.8 percent as the economy continues to expand and prices ease slightly. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, January 2004 History Projections Oct-03 Nov-03 Dec-03...

  10. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    of 2005 relative to the first quarter of 2004 and relatively lower fuel oil prices. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, April 2004 History Projections Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04...

  11. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    should relieve some of the potential upward price pressure on the domestic market Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, January 2003 History Projections Oct-02 Nov-02 Dec-02...

  12. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    because of somewhat weaker prices and higher demand in the electric power sector. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, July 2003 History Projections Apr-03 May-03 Jun-03 Jul-03...

  13. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    than those of 2003, when stocks after the winter of 2002-2003 were at record lows. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, December 2003 History Projections Sep-03 Oct-03 Nov-03...

  14. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    power sector eases and relative coal and fuel oil spot prices decline somewhat. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, May 2004 History Projections Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04...

  15. Natural Gas Summary from the Short-Term Energy Outlook

    Annual Energy Outlook [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

    demand in the first quarter of 2005 relative to the first quarter of 2004. Short-Term Natural Gas Market Outlook, March 2004 History Projections Dec-03 Jan-04 Feb-04...

  16. [Fuel substitution of vehicles by natural gas: Summaries of four final technical reports

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-05-01

    This report contains summary information on three meetings and highlights of a fourth meeting held by the Society of Automotive Engineers on natural gas fueled vehicles. The meetings covered the following: Natural gas engine and vehicle technology; Safety aspects of alternately fueled vehicles; Catalysts and emission control--Meeting the legislative standards; and LNG--Strengthening the links.

  17. Brief 70 Nuclear Engineering Enrollments and Degrees, 2011 Summary Information

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dr. Don Johnson

    2012-10-31

    The survey includes degrees granted between September 1, 2010 and August 31, 2011. Enrollment information refers to the fall term 2011. The enrollment and degree data include students majoring in nuclear engineering or in an option program equivalent to a major. Thirty-two academic programs reported having nuclear engineering programs during 2011, and data was received from all thirty-two programs. The data for two nuclear engineering programs include enrollments and degrees in health physics options that are also reported in the health physics enrollments and degrees data.

  18. ,"Alabama Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1968" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  19. ,"Colorado Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  20. ,"Connecticut Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","9/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  1. ,"Delaware Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","9/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  2. ,"Maine Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","9/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  3. ,"Maryland Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1999" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  4. ,"Nevada Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1991" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 4","Consumption",10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","9/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  5. ,"North Carolina Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","9/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  6. ,"Pennsylvania Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",15,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  7. ,"Rhode Island Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1996,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","9/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  8. ,"South Carolina Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","9/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  9. ,"Virginia Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 5","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data

  10. ,"Wisconsin Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 3","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 4","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","9/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  11. ,"Alaska Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",12,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",6,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  12. ,"California Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  13. ,"Georgia Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1999" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1974" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  14. ,"Idaho Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",2,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1974" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 5","Consumption",9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  15. ,"Indiana Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  16. ,"Louisiana Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  17. ,"Massachusetts Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",1,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",3,"Annual",1975,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  18. ,"Minnesota Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  19. ,"Missouri Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  20. ,"Nebraska Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",11,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  1. ,"Oregon Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",11,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1979" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  2. ,"Tennessee Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Production",13,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1968" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",11,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  3. ,"Texas Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    10,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1981" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  4. ,"U.S. Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1922" ,"Data 2","Dry Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1925" ,"Data 3","Production",13,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1900" ,"Data 4","Imports and Exports",6,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1973" ,"Data 5","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1935" ,"Data 6","Liquefied Natural Gas

  5. ,"Washington Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 2","Imports and Exports",2,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1982" ,"Data 3","Underground Storage",4,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Data 4","Liquefied Natural Gas Storage",3,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1980" ,"Data 5","Consumption",9,"Annual",2015,"6/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","8/31/2016"

  6. Summary

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    [ 6450-01-P ] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Lake Charles Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project, Lake Charles, Louisiana AGENCY: Department of Energy ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Proposed Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy

  7. Nuclear rapprochement in Argentina and Brazil: Workshop summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    James E. Doyle

    1999-10-01

    On October 21 and 22, 1998, the Center for International Security Affairs at Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Center for Global Security and Cooperation at Science Applications International Corporation hosted the first of a series of work-shops on states that have chosen to roll back their pursuit of nuclear arms. The objective of the workshop series is to conduct a systematic evaluation of the roles played by U.S. nonproliferation policy in cases of nuclear rollback or restraint and to provide recommendations for future nonproliferation efforts based on lessons learned. Key attendees at the workshop included officials and former officials from the foreign ministries of Argentina and Brazil, and current and former officials from the U.S. Department of State, the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), and the Department of Energy (DOE). Scholars and independent researchers who have examined nuclear policy in Argentina and Brazil also participated. This workshop report includes important background information that helps set the stage for assessing nuclear policies in Argentina and Brazil. It describes national perspectives and areas of consensus and debate among the participants, particularly on the questions of lessons learned and their salience to proliferation challenges in other states. It also summarizes key questions and propositions regarding the roles played in these cases by U.S. nonproliferation policy.

  8. Summary Report of the Workshop on The Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Database

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Semkova, V.; Pritychenko, B.

    2014-10-10

    The Workshop on the Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Database (EXFOR) was held at IAEA Headquarters in Vienna from 6 to 10 October 2014. The workshop was organized to discuss various aspects of the EXFOR compilation process including compilation rules, different techniques for nuclear reaction data measurements, software developments, etc. A summary of the presentations and discussions that took place during the workshop is reported here.

  9. Nuclear Waste Analytical Round Robins 1-6 summary report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, G.L.; Marschman, S.C.

    1993-12-31

    The MCC has conducted six round robins for the waste management, research, and development community from 1987 to present. The laboratories participating regularly are Ames, Argonne, Catholic University, Lawrence Livermore, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Savannah River, and West Valley Nuclear. Glass types analyzed in these round robins all have been simulated nuclear waste compositions expected from vitrification of high-level nuclear waste. A wide range of analytical procedures have been used by the participating laboratories including Atomic Absorption spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy, direct current plasma-emission spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy techniques. Consensus average relative error for Round Robins 1 through 6 is 5.4%, with values ranging from 9.4 to 1.1%. Trend on the average improved with each round robin. When the laboratories analyzed samples over longer periods of time, the intralaboratory variability increased. Lab-to-lab variation accounts for most of the total variability found in all the round robins. Participation in the radiochemistry portion has been minimal, and analytical results poor compared to nonradiochemistry portion. Additional radiochemical work is needed in future round robins.

  10. The U.S. Nuclear Data Network: Summary of the twentieth meeting

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-12-31

    Topics discussed at this meeting were: assessment of the nuclear data program from the perspective of the funding agency; status of high spin evaluations for ENSDF; recommendation for name change of master file from Nuclear Structure Reference to Nuclear Science Reference; status of ENSDF, Table of Isotopes, VuENSDF, on-line system at the NNDC, and Nuclear Data Sheets; summary of the discussion of the Formats and Procedures Subcommittee; long range plan for nuclear structure data; a description of methods of optimization of nuclear structure evaluations and how to evolve this activity into the forefront of research such as high-spin physics; code development which includes improvements in the databases and evaluator tools; and future means of data dissemination.

  11. Executive Summary - Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Logan, J.; Heath, G.; Macknick, J.; Paranhos, E.; Boyd, W.; Carlson, K.

    2013-01-01

    In November 2012, the Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) released a new report, 'Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity.' The study provides a new methodological approach to estimate natural gas related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, tracks trends in regulatory and voluntary industry practices, and explores various electricity futures. The Executive Summary provides key findings, insights, data, and figures from this major study.

  12. QUARTERLY NUCLEAR POWER DEPLOYMENT SUMMARY JULY 2013 News Updates

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    3 News Updates  Dominion Resources, Inc. has informed the NRC that Dominion Virginia Power will amend its COL application to reflect the ESBWR technology by the end of 2013. In 2009 Dominion dropped the ESBWR from its COLA after failing to reach a commercial agreement with General Electric-Hitachi (GEH). A COL is expected no earlier than late 2015. Dominion Virginia Power has not yet committed to building a new nuclear unit at North Anna.  NRC has determined that the latest revision to the

  13. Summary of space nuclear reactor power systems, 1983--1992

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Buden, D.

    1993-08-11

    This report summarizes major developments in the last ten years which have greatly expanded the space nuclear reactor power systems technology base. In the SP-100 program, after a competition between liquid-metal, gas-cooled, thermionic, and heat pipe reactors integrated with various combinations of thermoelectric thermionic, Brayton, Rankine, and Stirling energy conversion systems, three concepts:were selected for further evaluation. In 1985, the high-temperature (1,350 K), lithium-cooled reactor with thermoelectric conversion was selected for full scale development. Since then, significant progress has been achieved including the demonstration of a 7-y-life uranium nitride fuel pin. Progress on the lithium-cooled reactor with thermoelectrics has progressed from a concept, through a generic flight system design, to the design, development, and testing of specific components. Meanwhile, the USSR in 1987--88 orbited a new generation of nuclear power systems beyond the, thermoelectric plants on the RORSAT satellites. The US has continued to advance its own thermionic fuel element development, concentrating on a multicell fuel element configuration. Experimental work has demonstrated a single cell operating time of about 1 1/2-y. Technology advances have also been made in the Stirling engine; an advanced engine that operates at 1,050 K is ready for testing. Additional concepts have been studied and experiments have been performed on a variety of systems to meet changing needs; such as powers of tens-to-hundreds of megawatts and highly survivable systems of tens-of-kilowatts power.

  14. Nature of Transactions (TI) Code | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    | (NNSA) Nature of Transactions (TI) Code U.S. Department of Energy / U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Materials Management & Safeguards System Nature of Transactions (TI) Code* Nature of Transactions (TI) Code* Code: Description: A Initiates lease and financial responsibility of DOE-owned material B Transfer of lease and financial responsiblity of DOE-owned material C Transfer of DOE-owned material with no change in lease or financial responsibility D Return to DOE for credit

  15. Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Powell, Danny H; Elwood Jr, Robert H

    2011-01-01

    An effective risk assessment system is needed to address the threat posed by an active or passive insider who, acting alone or in collusion, could attempt diversion or theft of nuclear material. The material control and accountability (MC&A) system effectiveness tool (MSET) is a self-assessment or inspection tool utilizing probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) methodology to calculate the system effectiveness of a nuclear facility's material protection, control, and accountability (MPC&A) system. The MSET process is divided into four distinct and separate parts: (1) Completion of the questionnaire that assembles information about the operations of every aspect of the MPC&A system; (2) Conversion of questionnaire data into numeric values associated with risk; (3) Analysis of the numeric data utilizing the MPC&A fault tree and the SAPHIRE computer software; and (4) Self-assessment using the MSET reports to perform the effectiveness evaluation of the facility's MPC&A system. The process should lead to confirmation that mitigating features of the system effectively minimize the threat, or it could lead to the conclusion that system improvements or upgrades are necessary to achieve acceptable protection against the threat. If the need for system improvements or upgrades is indicated when the system is analyzed, MSET provides the capability to evaluate potential or actual system improvements or upgrades. A facility's MC&A system can be evaluated at a point in time. The system can be reevaluated after upgrades are implemented or after other system changes occur. The total system or specific subareas within the system can be evaluated. Areas of potential system improvement can be assessed to determine where the most beneficial and cost-effective improvements should be made. Analyses of risk importance factors show that sustainability is essential for optimal performance and reveals where performance degradation has the greatest impact on total system risk. The risk

  16. Summary Report for the Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School 2014

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Runkle, Robert C.; Baciak, James E.; Woodring, Mitchell L.; Jenno, Diana M.

    2014-09-30

    Executive Summary The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) hosted students from across the United States at the 3rd Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School from 16 – 27 June 2014. The summer school provided students with a unique understanding of nuclear security challenges faced in the field and exposed them to the technical foundations, analyses, and insight that will be required by future leaders in technology development and implementation. The course heavily emphasized laboratory and field demonstrations including direct measurements of special nuclear material. Student evaluations and feedback from student advisors indicates that the summer school achieved its objectives of 1) exposing students to the range of nuclear security applications for which radiation detection is necessary, 2) articulating the relevance of student research into the broader context, and 3) exciting students about the possibility of future careers in nuclear security. In fact, we are beginning to see previous students both enroll in graduate programs (former undergraduates) and complete internships at agencies like the National Nuclear Security Administration.

  17. Nuclear criticality safety experiments, calculations, and analyses - 1958 to 1982. Volume 2. Summaries. Complilation of papers from the Transactions of the American Nuclear Society

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Koponen, B.L.; Hampel, V.E.

    1982-10-21

    This compilation contains 688 complete summaries of papers on nuclear criticality safety as presented at meetings of the American Nuclear Society (ANS). The selected papers contain criticality parameters for fissile materials derived from experiments and calculations, as well as criticality safety analyses for fissile material processing, transport, and storage. The compilation was developed as a component of the Nuclear Criticality Information System (NCIS) now under development at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The compilation is presented in two volumes: Volume 1 contains a directory to the ANS Transaction volume and page number where each summary was originally published, the author concordance, and the subject concordance derived from the keyphrases in titles. Volume 2 contains-in chronological order-the full-text summaries, reproduced here by permission of the American Nuclear Society from their Transactions, volumes 1-41.

  18. DHS National Technical Nuclear Forensics Program FY 10 Summary Report: Graduate Mentoring Assistance Program (GMAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Martha R. Finck Ph.D.

    2011-10-01

    This program provides practical training to DHS graduate fellows in the DOE laboratory complex. It involves coordinating students, their thesis advisors, and their laboratory project mentors in establishing a meaningful program of research which contributes to the graduate student's formation as a member of the nuclear forensics community. The summary report details the student/mentor experience and future plans after the first summer practicum. This program provides practical training to DHS graduate fellows in the DOE laboratory complex. It involves coordinating students, their thesis advisors, and their laboratory project mentors in establishing a meaningful program of research which contributes to the graduate student's formation as a member of the nuclear forensics community. This final written report includes information concerning the overall mentoring experience, including benefits (to the lab, the mentors, and the students), challenges, student research contributions, and lab mentor interactions with students home universities. Idaho National Laboratory hosted two DHS Nuclear Forensics graduate Fellows (nuclear engineering) in summer 2011. Two more Fellows (radiochemistry) are expected to conduct research at the INL under this program starting in 2012. An undergraduate Fellow (nuclear engineering) who worked in summer 2011 at the laboratory is keenly interested in applying for the NF Graduate Fellowship this winter with the aim of returning to INL. In summary, this program appears to have great potential for success in supporting graduate level students who pursue careers in nuclear forensics. This relatively specialized field may not have been an obvious choice for some who have already shown talent in the traditional areas of chemistry or nuclear engineering. The active recruiting for this scholarship program for candidates at universities across the U.S. brings needed visibility to this field. Not only does this program offer critical practical training

  19. Natural Abundance 17O Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Computational Modeling

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Studies of Lithium Based Liquid Electrolytes - Joint Center for Energy Storage Research March 14, 2015, Research Highlights Natural Abundance 17O Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Computational Modeling Studies of Lithium Based Liquid Electrolytes (Top) Example of natural abundance 17O NMR spectra of LiTFSI in mixture of EC, PC and EMC (4:1:5 by weight). (Bottom) The solvation structure of LiTFSI derived from the results obtained by both NMR and quantum chemistry calculations Scientific

  20. Natural circulating passive cooling system for nuclear reactor containment structure

    DOE Patents [OSTI]

    Gou, Perng-Fei; Wade, Gentry E.

    1990-01-01

    A passive cooling system for the contaminant structure of a nuclear reactor plant providing protection against overpressure within the containment attributable to inadvertent leakage or rupture of the system components. The cooling system utilizes natural convection for transferring heat imbalances and enables the discharge of irradiation free thermal energy to the atmosphere for heat disposal from the system.

  1. Hydrogen and Hydrogen/Natural Gas Station and Vehicle Operations - 2006 Summary Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Francfort; Donald Karner; Roberta Brayer

    2006-09-01

    This report is a summary of the operations and testing of internal combustion engine vehicles that were fueled with 100% hydrogen and various blends of hydrogen and compressed natural gas (HCNG). It summarizes the operations of the Arizona Public Service Alternative Fuel Pilot Plant, which produces, compresses, and dispenses hydrogen fuel. Other testing activities, such as the destructive testing of a CNG storage cylinder that was used for HCNG storage, are also discussed. This report highlights some of the latest technology developments in the use of 100% hydrogen fuels in internal combustion engine vehicles. Reports are referenced and WWW locations noted as a guide for the reader that desires more detailed information. These activities are conducted by Arizona Public Service, Electric Transportation Applications, the Idaho National Laboratory, and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity.

  2. Table 1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, 2010-2014

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Table 1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, 2010-2014 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Wells Producing at End of Year 487,627 514,637 482,822 R 484,994 514,786 Production (million cubic feet) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells 13,247,498 12,291,070 12,504,227 R 10,759,545 10,384,119 From Oil Wells 5,834,703 5,907,919 4,965,833 R 5,404,699 5,922,088 From Coalbed Wells 1,916,762 1,779,055 1,539,395 R 1,425,783 1,285,189 From Shale Gas Wells 5,817,122 8,500,983

  3. The Geochemistry of Technetium: A Summary of the Behavior of an Artificial Element in the Natural Environment

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Icenhower, Jonathan P.; Qafoku, Nikolla; Martin, Wayne J.; Zachara, John M.

    2008-12-01

    Interest in the chemistry of technetium has only increased since its discovery in 1937, mainly because of the large and growing inventory of 99Tc generated during fission of 235U, its environmental mobility in oxidizing conditions, and its potential radiotoxicity. For every ton of enriched uranium fuel (3% 235U) that is consumed at a typical burn-up rate, nearly 1 kg of 99Tc is generated. Thus, the mass of 99Tc produced since 1993 has nearly quadrupled, and will likely to continue to increase if more emphasis is placed on nuclear power to slow the accumulation of atmospheric greenhouse gases. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the interaction of 99Tc and the natural environment, we review the sources of 99Tc in the nuclear fuel cycle, its chemical properties, radiochemistry, and biogeochemical behavior. We include an evaluation of the use of Re as a chemical analog of Tc, as well as a summary of the redox potential, thermodynamics, sorption, colloidal behavior, and interaction of humic substances with Tc, and the potential for re-oxidation and remobilization of Tc(IV). What emerges is a more complicated picture of Tc behavior than that of an easily tractable transition of Tc(VII) to Tc(IV) with consequent immobilization. Reducing conditions (+200 to +100 mV Eh) are generally thought necessary to cause reduction of Tc(VII) to Tc(IV), but far more important are the presence of reducing agents, such as Fe(II) sorbed onto mineral grains. Catalysis of Tc(VII) by surface-mediated Fe(II) will bring the mobile Tc(VII) species to a lower oxidation state and will form the relatively insoluble Tc(IV)O2∙nH2O, but even as a solid, equilibrium concentrations of aqueous Tc are nearly a factor of 20× above the EPA set drinking water standards. However, sequestration of Tc(IV) into Fe(III)-bearing phases, such as goethite or other hydrous oxyhydroxides of iron, may ameliorate concerns over the mobility of Tc. Further, the outcome of many studies on terrestrial and

  4. Natural convection heat transfer within horizontal spent nuclear fuel assemblies

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Canaan, R.E.

    1995-12-01

    Natural convection heat transfer is experimentally investigated in an enclosed horizontal rod bundle, which characterizes a spent nuclear fuel assembly during dry storage and/or transport conditions. The basic test section consists of a square array of sixty-four stainless steel tubular heaters enclosed within a water-cooled rectangular copper heat exchanger. The heaters are supplied with a uniform power generation per unit length while the surrounding enclosure is maintained at a uniform temperature. The test section resides within a vacuum/pressure chamber in order to subject the assembly to a range of pressure statepoints and various backfill gases. The objective of this experimental study is to obtain convection correlations which can be used in order to easily incorporate convective effects into analytical models of horizontal spent fuel systems, and also to investigate the physical nature of natural convection in enclosed horizontal rod bundles in general. The resulting data consist of: (1) measured temperatures within the assembly as a function of power, pressure, and backfill gas; (2) the relative radiative contribution for the range of observed temperatures; (3) correlations of convective Nusselt number and Rayleigh number for the rod bundle as a whole; and (4) correlations of convective Nusselt number as a function of Rayleigh number for individual rods within the array.

  5. Summary of four release consequence analyses for hypothetical nuclear waste repositories in salt and granite

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cole, C.R.; Bond, F.W.

    1980-12-01

    Release consequence methology developed under the Assessment of Effectiveness of Geologic Isolation Systems (AEGIS) program has now been applied to four hypothetical repository sites. This paper summarizes the results of these four studies in order to demonstrate that the far-field methodology developed under the AEGIS program offers a practical approach to the post-closure safety assessment of nuclear waste repositories sited in deep continental geologic formations. The four studies are briefly described and compared according to the following general categories: physical description of the repository (size, inventory, emplacement depth); geologic and hydrologic description of the site and the conceptual hydrologic model for the site; description of release scenario; hydrologic model implementation and results; engineered barriers and leach rate modeling; transport model implementation and results; and dose model implementation and results. These studies indicate the following: numerical modeling is a practical approach to post-closure safety assessment analysis for nuclear waste repositories; near-field modeling capability needs improvement to permit assessment of the consequences of human intrusion and pumping well scenarios; engineered barrier systems can be useful in mitigating consequences for postulated release scenarios that short-circuit the geohydrologic system; geohydrologic systems separating a repository from the natural biosphere discharge sites act to mitigate the consequences of postulated breaches in containment; and engineered barriers of types other than the containment or absorptive type may be useful.

  6. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Livermore Site Office | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Nuclear Energy 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the West Valley Demonstration Project...

  7. 2010 Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA-SC)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

  8. Next Generation * Natural Gas (NG)2 Information Requirements--Executive Summary

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2000-01-01

    The Energy Information Administration (EIA) has initiated the Next Generation * Natural Gas (NG)2 project to design and implement a new and comprehensive information program for natural gas to meet customer requirements in the post-2000 time frame.

  9. TX, State Offshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    64 131 118 94 59 42 1981-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 161 128 113 88 56 42 1981-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 3 3 ...

  10. LA, State Offshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    728 386 519 519 420 341 1981-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 215 279 468 391 332 273 1981-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease ...

  11. CA, Coastal Region Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    169 180 173 305 284 277 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1 2 1 2 2 8 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 168 178 172 303 282 269 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 163 173 165 290 266 261

  12. CA, State Offshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    57 66 82 66 75 76 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 4 3 3 1 0 0 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 53 63 79 65 75 76 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 57 66 82 66 75 76

  13. FY 2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration | (NNSA) Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary SUMMARY OF FY 2012 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC, AWARD FEE DETERMINATION Total Available Fee Total Fee Earned % $74,510,494 $59,74x,064 80% Los Alamos National Security, LLC, the management and operating contractor for the Los Alamos National Laboratory, earned a "Very Good" rating in Program, a "Good" in Operations, a "Satisfactory" in Institutional Management and Business, and

  14. The U.S. Nuclear Data Network: Summary of the twenty-first meeting

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-08-01

    The following progress reports and related documents from the members of the US Nuclear Data Network (USNDN) are included at attachments: INEL Decay Data and Mass-chain Evaluation Project; Decay-data Evaluation Project; Isotopes Project Report; Report on High-spin Data Evaluations; The NNDC Activity Report, Parts A and B; Nuclear Science References (NSR) Task Force Report; Status of Mass Chains A = 1 to 266; Nuclear Data Project Activity Report; and TUNL Nuclear Data Evaluation Project Report; The progress report of the Center for Nuclear Information Technology; An Overview of the USNDN; Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File-Status; Report on High-spin Evaluations for ENSDF since November 1994; The High-spin Data and the Workshop on Data Analysis; Decay Data Evaluation Project; Compilation of High Energy Heavy-ion and Electron Interaction Data; Dissemination/code development update; 8th Edition of the Table of Isotopes/VuENSDF; Bits of Power-Issues in the Transborder Flow of Scientific and Technical Data; Data activities at the Center for Nuclear Information Technology (CNIT), San Jose State University; The Agenda and the Minutes of the Formats and Procedures Subcommittee of the NSDD; A status report on the US Nuclear Reaction Data Network (USNRDN); Coordination/Cooperation and Communication as applied to the USNDN; Nuclear Structure Data Evaluations: Issues/Concerns; Electronic Publishing of Nuclear Data; The status of the Nuclear Astrophysics Data Project; and Nuclear Astrophysics Data needs for A=3-20/Possible contributions by TUNL. The attendees formed the three Discussion Groups. The charge to these Discussion Groups was how to achieve the goal of the USNDN to make the ENSDF and the NSR the best nuclear structure and bibliographic databases available, while maintaining a proper balance between evaluations and data dissemination.

  15. U.S. Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    283,879 317,647 348,809 322,670 353,994 388,841 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 250,496 281,901 305,986 269,514 295,504 319,724 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 33,383 35,746 42,823 53,156 58,490 69,117 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 272,509 304,625 334,067 308,036 338,264 368,704 1925-2014 Natural Gas Liquids (Million Barrels) 1979

  16. LA, South Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,969 2,995 2,615 3,149 2,857 3,080 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,463 2,496 2,125 2,586 2,254 2,432 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, ...

  17. Lower 48 States Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    274,696 308,730 339,298 313,003 346,611 382,036 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 249,406 280,880 305,010 268,519 294,549 318,770 1979-2014 Natural ...

  18. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within the NNSA Defense Nuclear NonProliferation.

  19. CA, San Joaquin Basin Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,609 2,447 2,685 1,650 1,574 1,823 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 607 498 506 269 245 265 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 2,002 1,949 2,179 1,381 1,329 1,558 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,469 2,321 2,590 1,550 1,460 1,69

  20. Federal Offshore U.S. Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,856 12,120 10,820 9,853 8,567 8,968 1990-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 7,633 6,916 5,374 3,989 3,037 3,634 1990-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 5,223 5,204 5,446 5,864 5,530 5,334 1990-2014 Dry Natural Gas 12,552 11,765 10,420 9,392 8,193 8,527 1990

  1. TX, RRC District 1 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    523 2,599 6,127 9,141 8,118 12,431 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1,456 2,332 5,227 6,516 4,442 7,733 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 67 267 900 2,625 3,676 4,698 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 1,398 2,399 5,910 8,868 7,784 11,945

  2. TX, RRC District 10 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,594 8,484 8,373 8,007 7,744 8,354 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,984 7,915 7,475 7,073 6,660 7,140 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 610 569 898 934 1,084 1,214 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 6,882 7,663 7,513 7,253 7,034 7,454

  3. TX, RRC District 2 Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    909 2,235 3,690 5,985 6,640 7,524 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 1,837 2,101 2,766 3,986 4,348 4,802 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 72 134 924 1,999 2,292 2,722 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 1,800 2,090 3,423 5,462 5,910 6,559

  4. TX, RRC District 3 Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,802 2,774 2,490 2,429 2,592 2,483 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,326 2,308 2,091 1,965 1,795 1,760 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 476 466 399 464 797 723 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,616 2,588 2,260 2,154 2,307 2,19

  5. TX, RRC District 4 Onshore Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,057 7,392 10,054 9,566 11,101 12,482 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 6,961 7,301 9,993 9,467 11,038 12,291 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 96 91 61 99 63 191 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 6,728 7,014 9,458 8,743 9,640 11,057

  6. TX, RRC District 5 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    22,623 24,694 28,187 17,640 19,531 18,155 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 22,602 24,686 28,147 17,587 19,354 17,970 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 21 8 40 53 177 185 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 22,343 24,363 27,843 17,331 19,280 17,880

  7. TX, RRC District 6 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    13,257 15,416 15,995 11,726 12,192 12,023 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 12,806 14,958 15,524 11,204 11,553 11,640 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 451 458 471 522 639 383 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 12,795 14,886 15,480 11,340 11,655 11,516

  8. TX, RRC District 7B Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    2,424 2,625 3,887 3,363 3,267 2,695 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 2,322 2,504 3,754 3,183 3,040 2,418 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 102 121 133 180 227 277 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 2,077 2,242 3,305 2,943 2,787 2,290

  9. TX, RRC District 7C Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5,430 5,432 5,236 5,599 5,584 7,103 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,724 3,502 2,857 2,523 2,183 2,444 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,706 1,930 2,379 3,076 3,401 4,659 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 4,827 4,787 4,475 4,890 4,800 6,422

  10. TX, RRC District 8 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    7,440 8,105 8,088 8,963 9,715 11,575 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 3,950 3,777 3,006 2,309 2,315 2,480 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 3,490 4,328 5,082 6,654 7,400 9,095 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 6,672 7,206 7,039 7,738 8,629 9,742

  11. TX, RRC District 8A Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    1,289 1,228 1,289 1,280 1,338 1,328 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 43 58 31 20 23 24 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 1,246 1,170 1,258 1,260 1,315 1,304 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 1,218 1,164 1,226 1,214 1,269 1,257

  12. TX, RRC District 9 Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    11,522 13,172 10,920 9,682 10,040 9,760 1979-2014 Natural Gas Nonassociated, Wet After Lease Separation 11,100 12,587 9,963 8,521 8,947 8,283 1979-2014 Natural Gas Associated-Dissolved, Wet After Lease Separation 422 585 957 1,161 1,093 1,477 1979-2014 Dry Natural Gas 10,904 12,464 10,115 8,894 9,195 8,791

  13. Summary Report for the Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School 2012

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Runkle, Robert C.; Baciak, James E.; Stave, Jean A.

    2012-08-22

    The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) hosted students from across the United States at the inaugural Radiation Detection for Nuclear Security Summer School from June 11 – 22, 2012. The summer school provided students with a unique understanding of nuclear security challenges faced in the field and exposed them to the technical foundations, analyses, and insight that will be required by future leaders in technology development and implementation. The course heavily emphasized laboratory and field demonstrations including direct measurements of special nuclear material. The first week of the summer school focused on the foundational knowledge required by technology practitioners; the second week focused on contemporary applications. Student evaluations and feedback from student advisors indicates that the summer school achieved its objectives of 1) exposing students to the range of nuclear security applications for which radiation detection is necessary, 2) articulating the relevance of student research into the broader context, and 3) exciting students about the possibility of future careers in nuclear security.

  14. Summary. “Materials Challenges in Nuclear Energy,” S.J. Zinkle, 2013

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pestovich, Kimberly Shay

    2015-11-05

    Nuclear energy continues to grow in abundance and importance. It offers a future electric grid based entirely off of green energy, and it has numerous applications. Nuclear power has capabilities to desalinate water, deliver process heat or steam, affordably crack hydrogen from water, and extract unconventional fossil fuel sources. Current light water reactors demonstrate high reliability under normal operating conditions. Researchers have shown significant interest and investigating how to extend reactor lifespans and into other possible reactor designs. Further understanding of mechanisms responsible for corrosion and stress corrosion cracking, radiation hardening and degradation, and nuclear fuels innovations can lead to safer, more reliable, and cost-effective water-cooled nuclear reactors for electricity production.

  15. Miscellaneous: Uruguay energy supply options study assessing the market for natural gas - executive summary.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Conzelmann, G.; Veselka, T.; Decision and Information Sciences

    2008-03-04

    Uruguay is in the midst of making critical decisions affecting the design of its future energy supply system. Momentum for change is expected to come from several directions, including recent and foreseeable upgrades and modifications to energy conversion facilities, the importation of natural gas from Argentina, the possibility for a stronger interconnection of regional electricity systems, the country's membership in MERCOSUR, and the potential for energy sector reforms by the Government of Uruguay. The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of several fuel diversification strategies on Uruguay's energy supply system. The analysis pays special attention to fuel substitution trends due to potential imports of natural gas via a gas pipeline from Argentina and increasing electricity ties with neighboring countries. The Government of Uruguay has contracted with Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) to study several energy development scenarios with the support of several Uruguayan institutions. Specifically, ANL was asked to conduct a detailed energy supply and demand analysis, develop energy demand projections based on an analysis of past energy demand patterns with support from local institutions, evaluate the effects of potential natural gas imports and electricity exchanges, and determine the market penetration of natural gas under various scenarios.

  16. Table B1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, metric equivalents, 2010-2014

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8 Table B1. Summary statistics for natural gas in the United States, metric equivalents, 2010-2014 See footnotes at end of table. Number of Wells Producing at End of Year 487,627 514,637 482,822 R 484,994 514,786 Production (million cubic meters) Gross Withdrawals From Gas Wells 375,127 348,044 354,080 R 304,676 294,045 From Oil Wells 165,220 167,294 140,617 R 153,044 167,695 From Coalbed Wells 54,277 50,377 43,591 R 40,374 36,392 From Shale Gas Wells 164,723 240,721 298,257 R 337,891 389,474

  17. Summary report on transportation of nuclear fuel materials in Japan : transportation infrastructure, threats identified in open literature, and physical protection regulations.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cochran, John Russell; Ouchi, Yuichiro; Furaus, James Phillip; Marincel, Michelle K.

    2008-03-01

    This report summarizes the results of three detailed studies of the physical protection systems for the protection of nuclear materials transport in Japan, with an emphasis on the transportation of mixed oxide fuel materials1. The Japanese infrastructure for transporting nuclear fuel materials is addressed in the first section. The second section of this report presents a summary of baseline data from the open literature on the threats of sabotage and theft during the transport of nuclear fuel materials in Japan. The third section summarizes a review of current International Atomic Energy Agency, Japanese and United States guidelines and regulations concerning the physical protection for the transportation of nuclear fuel materials.

  18. Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Light Water Reactors Utility Requirements Document Small Modular Reactors Inclusion Summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Loflin, Leonard; McRimmon, Beth

    2014-12-18

    This report summarizes a project by EPRI to include requirements for small modular light water reactors (smLWR) into the EPRI Utility Requirements Document (URD) for Advanced Light Water Reactors. The project was jointly funded by EPRI and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The report covers the scope and content of the URD, the process used to revise the URD to include smLWR requirements, a summary of the major changes to the URD to include smLWR, and how to use the URD as revised to achieve value on new plant projects.

  19. Preparation for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Extension Conference in 1995. Workshop summary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chrzanowski, P.L.

    1993-05-07

    About 30 specialists in non-proliferation participated in a workshop to explore ideas for US Government preparatory steps leading to the 1995 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Extension Conference. To that end, workshop sessions were devoted to reviewing the lessons learned from previous Review Conferences, discussing the threats to the non-proliferation regime together with ways of preserving and strengthening it, and examining the management of international nuclear commerce. A fundamental premise shared by workshop participants was that extension of the NPT is immensely important to international security. The importance of stemming proliferation and, more specifically, extending the Treaty, is growing as a result of the significant changes in the world. If the conferees of the Extension Conference decide on no extension or extension for a short limited duration, some technically advanced states that have foregone development of nuclear weapons may begin to rethink their options. Also, other arms control measures, such as the Chemical Weapons Convention, could start to unravel. The US must provide strong international leadership to ensure that the Extension Conference is a success, resulting in Treaty extension, perhaps through successive terms, into the indefinite future. Workshop participants were struck by the urgent need for the US to take organizational steps so that it is highly effective in its advance preparations for the Extension Conference. Moreover, the Extension Conference provides both a challenge and an opportunity to mold a cohesive set of US policy actions to define the future role of nuclear weapons and combat their proliferation.

  20. Nuclear containment steel liner corrosion workshop : final summary and recommendation report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Erler, Bryan A.; Weyers, Richard E.; Sagues, Alberto; Petti, Jason P.; Berke, Neal Steven; Naus, Dan J.

    2011-07-01

    This report documents the proceedings of an expert panel workshop conducted to evaluate the mechanisms of corrosion for the steel liner in nuclear containment buildings. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) sponsored this work which was conducted by Sandia National Laboratories. A workshop was conducted at the NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland on September 2 and 3, 2010. Due to the safety function performed by the liner, the expert panel was assembled in order to address the full range of issues that may contribute to liner corrosion. This report is focused on corrosion that initiates from the outer surface of the liner, the surface that is in contact with the concrete containment building wall. Liner corrosion initiating on the outer diameter (OD) surface has been identified at several nuclear power plants, always associated with foreign material left embedded in the concrete. The potential contributing factors to liner corrosion were broken into five areas for discussion during the workshop. Those include nuclear power plant design and operation, corrosion of steel in contact with concrete, concrete aging and degradation, concrete/steel non-destructive examination (NDE), and concrete repair and corrosion mitigation. This report also includes the expert panel member's recommendations for future research.

  1. Nature of Coulomb Shifts of Nuclear Scattering Resonances

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Takibayev, N.Zh.

    2005-07-01

    Relations determining the shift of energies and widths of scattering resonances are obtained within the method of evolution in the coupling constant. These relations generalize the well-known relations for the shift of levels in a discrete spectrum. The problem of determining the Coulomb shifts of low-energy resonances manifesting themselves in the cross section for the scattering of some light nuclei is solved. Examples that are of importance for nuclear astrophysics and examples of problems that are associated with the production of chemical elements are considered. The character of Coulomb shifts is studied within simple nuclear models. Respective numerical estimates are given, which agree satisfactorily with experimental data.

  2. Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Reserves Summary as of Dec. 31

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Imports From Yemen (Million Cubic Feet) Everett, MA Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Yemen (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 2,688 5,591 5,465 2,843 5,608 2,865 5,622 5,537 5,424 2012 2,805 2,765 2,721 2,589 2,899 2,837 2013 2,728 2,763 2,806 2,728 2014 2,329 2,806 2,871 2015 2,234 2,373 2,834 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 08/31/2016 Next

  3. Umatilla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation; 1998-2002 Summary Report.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Contor, Craig R.

    2004-07-01

    The Umatilla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Project (WWNPME) was funded by Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) as directed by section 4(h) of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980 (P. L. 96-501). This project is in accordance with and pursuant to measures 4.2A, 4.3C.1, 7.1A.2, 7.1C.3, 7.1C.4 and 7.1D.2 of the Northwest Power Planning Council's (NPPC) Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (NPPC 1994). Work was conducted by the Fisheries Program of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) under the Umatilla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Project (UBNPME). Chapter One provides an overview of the entire report and shows how the objectives of each statement of work from 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 contract years are organized and reported. This chapter also provides background information relevant to the aquatic resources of the Umatilla River Basin. (Figure 1-1, Tables 1-1 and 1-2). Data and reports from this and previous efforts are available on the CTUIR website http://www.umatilla.nsn.us. This project was one of several subprojects of the Umatilla River Basin Fisheries Restoration Master Plan (CTUIR 1984, ODFW 1986) orchestrated to rehabilitate salmon and steelhead runs in the Umatilla River Basin. Subprojects in additions to this project include: Watershed Enhancement and Rehabilitation; Hatchery Construction and Operation; Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation; Satellite Facility Construction and Operations for Juvenile Acclimation and Adult Holding and Spawning; Fish Passage Construction and Operation; Juvenile and Adult Passage Facility Evaluations; Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Basin, and Flow Augmentation to Increase Stream Flows below Irrigation Diversions.

  4. Summary Report of a Specialized Workshop on Nuclear Structure and Decay Data (NSDD) Evaluations

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nichols, Alan L.; Dimitrious, P.; Kondev, F. G.; Ricard-McCutchan, E.

    2015-04-27

    A three-day specialised workshop on Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluations was organised and held at the headquarters of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria, from 27 to 29 April 2015. This workshop covered a wide range of important topics and issues addressed when evaluating and maintaining the Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF). The primary aim was to improve evaluators’ abilities to identify and understand the most appropriate evaluation processes to adopt in the formulation of individual ENSDF data sets. Participants assessed and reviewed existing policies, procedures and codes, and round-table discussions included the debate and resolution of specific difficulties experienced by ENSDF evaluators (i.e., all workshop participants). The contents of this report constitute a record of this workshop, based on the presentations and subsequent discussions.

  5. Summary Report of the INL-JISEA Workshop on Nuclear Hybrud Energy Systems

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mark Antkowiak; Richard Boardman; Shannon Bragg-Sitton; Robert Cherry; Mark Ruth

    2012-07-01

    Hybrid energy systems utilize two or more energy resources as inputs to two or more physically coupled subsystems to produce one or more energy commodities as outputs. Nuclear hybrid energy systems can be used to provide load-following electrical power to match diurnal to seasonal-scale changes in power demand or to compensate for the variability of renewable wind or solar generation. To maintain economical, full rate operation of the nuclear reactor, its thermal energy available when power demand is low could be diverted into making synthetic vehicle fuels of various types. The Institute for Nuclear Energy Science and Technology (INEST) and the Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) co-sponsored an international workshop to identify research topics important in advancing the potential use of hybrid systems with a specific focus on nuclear-renewable hybrid systems. The workshop included presentations ranging from energy challenges and research and development (R&D) directions being pursued by nations to multiple options for hybrid systems. Those options include one that is being commercialized to other opportunities and analysis results quantifying them. The workshop also involved two breakout sessions - one focused on thermal energy management issues especially at unit-operation scale and the second focused on system operations issues including system controls, regulatory issues, technical and economic analysis, and market challenges. A discussion involving the full group focused on more general issues such as societal involvement and participation. Key criteria for selecting hybrid energy system projects and metrics for comparing them were also identified by the full group. The workshop's findings are being used initially by INEST to define topics for a research preproposal solicitation.

  6. High Temperature Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy – TechnologySummary

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    J. E. O'Brien; C. M. Stoots; J. S. Herring; M. G. McKellar; E. A. Harvego; M. S. Sohal; K. G. Condie

    2010-02-01

    The Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, has requested that a Hydrogen Technology Down-Selection be performed to identify the hydrogen production technology that has the best potential for timely commercial demonstration and for ultimate deployment with the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP). An Independent Review Team has been assembled to execute the down-selection. This report has been prepared to provide the members of the Independent Review Team with detailed background information on the High Temperature Electrolysis (HTE) process, hardware, and state of the art. The Idaho National Laboratory has been serving as the lead lab for HTE research and development under the Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative. The INL HTE program has included small-scale experiments, detailed computational modeling, system modeling, and technology demonstration. Aspects of all of these activities are included in this report. In terms of technology demonstration, the INL successfully completed a 1000-hour test of the HTE Integrated Laboratory Scale (ILS) technology demonstration experiment during the fall of 2008. The HTE ILS achieved a hydrogen production rate in excess of 5.7 Nm3/hr, with a power consumption of 18 kW. This hydrogen production rate is far larger than has been demonstrated by any of the thermochemical or hybrid processes to date.

  7. High integrity software for nuclear power plants: Candidate guidelines, technical basis and research needs. Executive summary: Volume 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Seth, S.; Bail, W.; Cleaves, D.; Cohen, H.; Hybertson, D.; Schaefer, C.; Stark, G.; Ta, A.; Ulery, B.

    1995-06-01

    The work documented in this report was performed in support of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission to examine the technical basis for candidate guidelines that could be considered in reviewing and evaluating high integrity computer software used in the safety systems of nuclear power plants. The framework for the work consisted of the following software development and assurance activities: requirements specification; design; coding; verification and validation, including static analysis and dynamic testing; safety analysis; operation and maintenance; configuration management; quality assurance; and planning and management. Each activity (framework element) was subdivided into technical areas (framework subelements). The report describes the development of approximately 200 candidate guidelines that span the entire range of software life-cycle activities; the assessment of the technical basis for those candidate guidelines; and the identification, categorization and prioritization of research needs for improving the technical basis. The report has two volumes: Volume 1, Executive Summary, includes an overview of the framework and of each framework element, the complete set of candidate guidelines, the results of the assessment of the technical basis for each candidate guideline, and a discussion of research needs that support the regulatory function; Volume 2 is the main report.

  8. Summary of results from the Series 2 and Series 3 NNWSI [Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations] bare fuel dissolution tests

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Wilson, C.N.

    1987-11-01

    The Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations (NNWSI) Project is studying dissolution and radionuclide release behavior of spent nuclear fuel in Nevada Test Site groundwater. Specimens were tested for multiple cycles in J-13 well water. The Series 2 tests were run in unsealed silica vessels under ambient hot cell air (25{sup 0}C) for five cycles for a total of 34 months. The Series 3 tests were run in sealed stainless steel vessels at 25{sup 0}C and 85{sup 0}C for three cycles for a total of 15 months. Selected summary results from Series 2 and Series 3 tests with bare fuel specimens are reported. Uranium concentrations in later test cycles ranged from 1 to 2 {mu}g/ml in the Series 2 Tests versus about 0.1 to 0.4 {mu}g/ml in Series 3 with the lowest concentrations occurring in the 85{sup 0}C tests. Preferential release of fission products Cs, I, Sr and Tc, and activation product C-14, was indicated relative to the actinides. Tc-99 and Cs-137 activities measured in solution after Cycle 1 increased linearly with time, with the rate of increase greater at 85{sup 0}C than at 25{sup 0}C. 8 refs., 8 figs., 3 tabs.

  9. Nuclear Energy Knowledge and Validation Center (NEKVaC) Needs Workshop Summary Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gougar, Hans

    2015-02-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) has made significant progress developing simulation tools to predict the behavior of nuclear systems with greater accuracy and of increasing our capability to predict the behavior of these systems outside of the standard range of applications. These analytical tools require a more complex array of validation tests to accurately simulate the physics and multiple length and time scales. Results from modern simulations will allow experiment designers to narrow the range of conditions needed to bound system behavior and to optimize the deployment of instrumentation to limit the breadth and cost of the campaign. Modern validation, verification and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ) techniques enable analysts to extract information from experiments in a systematic manner and provide the users with a quantified uncertainty estimate. Unfortunately, the capability to perform experiments that would enable taking full advantage of the formalisms of these modern codes has progressed relatively little (with some notable exceptions in fuels and thermal-hydraulics); the majority of the experimental data available today is the "historic" data accumulated over the last decades of nuclear systems R&D. A validated code-model is a tool for users. An unvalidated code-model is useful for code developers to gain understanding, publish research results, attract funding, etc. As nuclear analysis codes have become more sophisticated, so have the measurement and validation methods and the challenges that confront them. A successful yet cost-effective validation effort requires expertise possessed only by a few, resources possessed only by the well-capitalized (or a willing collective), and a clear, well-defined objective (validating a code that is developed to satisfy the need(s) of an actual user). To that end, the Idaho National Laboratory established the Nuclear Energy Knowledge and Validation Center to address the challenges of modern code validation and to

  10. Understanding the nature of nuclear power plant risk

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Denning, R. S.

    2012-07-01

    This paper describes the evolution of understanding of severe accident consequences from the non-mechanistic assumptions of WASH-740 to WASH-1400, NUREG-1150, SOARCA and today in the interpretation of the consequences of the accident at Fukushima. As opposed to the general perception, the radiological human health consequences to members of the Japanese public from the Fukushima accident will be small despite meltdowns at three reactors and loss of containment integrity. In contrast, the radiation-related societal impacts present a substantial additional economic burden on top of the monumental task of economic recovery from the nonnuclear aspects of the earthquake and tsunami damage. The Fukushima accident provides additional evidence that we have mis-characterized the risk of nuclear power plant accidents to ourselves and to the public. The human health risks are extremely small even to people living next door to a nuclear power plant. The principal risk associated with a nuclear power plant accident involves societal impacts: relocation of people, loss of land use, loss of contaminated products, decontamination costs and the need for replacement power. Although two of the three probabilistic safety goals of the NRC address societal risk, the associated quantitative health objectives in reality only address individual human health risk. This paper describes the types of analysis that would address compliance with the societal goals. (authors)

  11. Special nuclear materials cutoff exercise: Issues and lessons learned. Volume 1: Summary of exercise

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Libby, R.A.; Davis, C.; Segal, J.E.; Stanbro, W.D.

    1995-08-01

    In a September 1993 address to the United Nations General Assembly, President Clinton announced a new nonproliferation and export control policy that established a framework for US efforts to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The new policy proposed that the US undertake a comprehensive approach to the growing accumulation of fissile material. One of the key elements was for the US to support a special nuclear materials (SNM) multilateral convention prohibiting the production of highly enriched uranium (HEU) or plutonium for nuclear explosives purposes or outside of international safeguards. This policy is often referred to as the President`s Cutoff Initiative or the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT). Because both the US Department of Energy (DOE) and foreign reprocessing facilities similar to PUREX will likely to be inspected under a FMCT, the DOE Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation, Negotiations and Analysis Division (DOE/NN-41) tasked Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) to perform an information gathering exercise, the PUREX Exercise, using the Plutonium-Uranium Extraction (PUREX) Plant located on the Hanford Site in Washington State. PUREX is a former production reactor fuel reprocessing plant currently undergoing a transition to a ``decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) ready`` mode. The PUREX Exercise was conducted March 29--30, 1994, to examine aspects of the imposition of several possible cutoff regimes and to study verification of non-production of SNM for nuclear weapons purposes or outside of safeguards. A follow-up activity to further examine various additional verification regimes was held at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) on May 10, 1994.

  12. Summary Report of the INL-JISEA Workshop on Nuclear Hybrid Energy Systems

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Antkowiak, M.; Ruth, M.; Boardman, R.; Bragg-Sitton, S.; Cherry, R.; Shunn, L.

    2012-07-01

    The Institute for Nuclear Energy Science and Technology (INEST) and the Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) co-sponsored an international workshop to identify research topics important in advancing the potential use of hybrid systems with a specific focus on nuclear-renewable hybrid systems. The workshop included presentations ranging from energy challenges and research and development directions being pursued by nations to multiple options for hybrid systems. Those options include one that is being commercialized to other opportunities and analysis results quantifying them. The workshop also involved two breakout sessions--one focused on thermal energy management issues especially at unit-operation scale and the second focused on system operations issues including system controls, regulatory issues, technical and economic analysis, and market challenges. A discussion involving the full group focused on more general issues such as societal involvement and participation. Key criteria for selecting hybrid energy system projects and metrics for comparing them were also identified by the full group.

  13. EPRI/NRC-RES fire PRA guide for nuclear power facilities. Volume 1, summary and overview.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    2004-09-01

    This report documents state-of-the-art methods, tools, and data for the conduct of a fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) for a commercial nuclear power plant (NPP) application. The methods have been developed under the Fire Risk Re-quantification Study. This study was conducted as a joint activity between EPRI and the U. S. NRC Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) under the terms of an EPRI/RES Memorandum of Understanding [RS.1] and an accompanying Fire Research Addendum [RS.2]. Industry participants supported demonstration analyses and provided peer review of this methodology. The documented methods are intended to support future applications of Fire PRA, including risk-informed regulatory applications. The documented method reflects state-of-the-art fire risk analysis approaches. The primary objective of the Fire Risk Study was to consolidate recent research and development activities into a single state-of-the-art fire PRA analysis methodology. Methodological issues raised in past fire risk analyses, including the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) fire analyses, have been addressed to the extent allowed by the current state-of-the-art and the overall project scope. Methodological debates were resolved through a consensus process between experts representing both EPRI and RES. The consensus process included a provision whereby each major party (EPRI and RES) could maintain differing technical positions if consensus could not be reached. No cases were encountered where this provision was invoked. While the primary objective of the project was to consolidate existing state-of-the-art methods, in many areas, the newly documented methods represent a significant advancement over previously documented methods. In several areas, this project has, in fact, developed new methods and approaches. Such advances typically relate to areas of past methodological debate.

  14. Table 11. Summary of U.S. natural gas exports by point of exit, 2010-2014

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    1 Table 11. Summary of U.S. natural gas exports by point of exit, 2010-2014 (volumes in million cubic feet, prices in dollars per thousand cubic feet) See footnotes at end of table. Pipeline (Canada) Eastport, ID 12 5.85 10 4.74 0 -- 6 3.27 0 -- Calais, ME 452 4.53 1,028 4.46 6,952 4.30 13,425 8.45 2,694 6.22 Detroit, MI 44,275 4.69 43,690 4.26 50,347 3.10 50,439 4.04 46,981 5.36 Marysville, MI 22,198 4.87 41,964 4.48 42,866 3.18 35,273 3.98 24,583 5.45 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 4,011 5.27 9,555 4.23

  15. Louisiana Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    23 1967-2010 Imports 4.84 7.57 7.98 14.40 14.59 1989-2014 Exports 7.07 9.63 11.80 -- -- 2007-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.43 5.67 3.48 4.12 4.90 3.32 1984-2015 Residential 11.73 11.37 11.54 10.80 10.89 10.71 1967-2015 Commercial 9.88 9.36 8.44 8.59 9.01 7.93 1967-2015 Industrial 4.68 4.25 2.96 3.86 4.68 3.51 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 11.14 10.58 10.53 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.79 W 2.99 3.95 4.74 W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of

  16. Maine Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Imports 4.94 4.40 3.45 4.86 9.71 1999-2014 Exports 4.53 4.46 4.30 8.43 6.68 2007-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 8.19 8.14 7.73 7.35 10.33 NA 1984-2015 Residential 14.14 14.20 15.94 15.21 16.90 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 11.71 11.69 12.22 12.79 15.13 14.40 1967-2015 Industrial 11.23 10.89 10.35 10.32 11.93 NA 1997-2015 Electric Power W W W W W W 2001-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 131,035 149,736 76,540 55,248 79,892 1982-2014 Exports 452 1,028 6,952

  17. Maryland Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Wellhead NA 1967-2010 Imports 5.37 5.30 13.82 15.29 8.34 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.49 6.26 5.67 5.37 6.36 4.99 1984-2015 Residential 12.44 12.10 12.17 11.67 12.21 12.05 1967-2015 Commercial 9.87 10.29 10.00 10.06 10.52 10.00 1967-2015 Industrial 9.05 8.61 8.01 8.47 9.94 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.99 5.09 -- 1993-2012 Electric Power 5.77 5.44 W W 5.35 4.06 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 7 8 9 7 7 1989-2014 Gross

  18. Massachusetts Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Imports 4.86 4.77 3.69 5.49 8.00 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.74 7.04 6.03 6.20 6.96 NA 1984-2015 Residential 14.53 13.81 13.22 13.49 14.50 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 12.00 11.68 10.68 11.25 12.48 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 10.41 10.14 9.82 10.15 11.53 9.34 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 12.48 4.28 14.63 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.44 5.07 3.68 5.96 6.66 4.38 1997-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 164,984 135,278 86,609 63,987 28,825 1982-2014 Underground

  19. Michigan Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Wellhead 3.79 1967-2010 Imports 4.73 4.38 2.88 4.02 8.34 1989-2014 Exports 4.85 4.44 3.12 4.07 6.26 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.07 6.18 5.50 4.91 5.54 4.22 1984-2015 Residential 11.32 10.47 9.95 9.09 9.33 8.78 1967-2015 Commercial 8.95 9.14 8.35 7.82 8.28 7.49 1967-2015 Industrial 9.25 8.27 7.38 6.97 7.84 6.59 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.97 4.76 3.21 4.58 6.78 3.21 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves

  20. Minnesota Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Imports 4.49 4.15 2.87 3.87 5.60 1989-2014 Exports -- 3.90 3.46 3.83 11.05 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.48 5.04 4.26 4.58 6.56 4.40 1984-2015 Residential 8.76 8.85 7.99 8.19 9.89 8.84 1967-2015 Commercial 7.60 7.46 6.36 6.86 8.66 7.30 1967-2015 Industrial 5.58 5.55 4.28 4.94 6.57 4.95 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 16.49 10.55 10.56 1993-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 451,405 548,686 406,327 243,805 328,610

  1. Mississippi Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.17 1967-2010 Imports -- 12.93 -- -- -- 2007-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.73 5.29 3.97 4.44 5.29 NA 1984-2015 Residential 10.19 9.47 9.60 9.00 9.49 9.71 1967-2015 Commercial 8.75 7.99 7.37 7.61 8.36 7.86 1967-2015 Industrial 6.19 5.83 4.85 5.82 6.15 4.69 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 853 860 607 595 558 1977-2014 Adjustments 1 109 65 29 -15 1977-2014

  2. Missouri Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    1967-1997 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.17 5.85 5.27 4.99 5.76 4.65 1984-2015 Residential 11.66 12.02 12.25 10.88 10.83 11.59 1967-2015 Commercial 10.28 9.99 9.54 9.00 8.96 9.10 1967-2015 Industrial 8.70 8.54 7.85 8.19 8.00 7.75 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 6.34 6.11 5.64 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 0 53 100 26 28 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals NA NA NA 9 9 1967-2014 From Gas Wells NA NA NA 8 8

  3. Montana Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3.64 1967-2010 Imports 4.13 3.75 2.45 3.23 4.39 1989-2014 Exports 4.05 3.82 2.40 3.43 5.38 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.17 5.11 4.23 4.21 5.03 3.71 1984-2015 Residential 8.64 8.80 8.05 8.19 9.11 8.21 1967-2015 Commercial 8.54 8.66 7.98 8.09 8.77 7.82 1967-2015 Industrial 8.07 8.13 7.54 7.33 7.99 6.45 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 9.60 8.20 6.48 1990-2012 Electric Power W W W -- W -- 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 944 778

  4. Natural Gas Exports (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    168,530 162,762 194,921 176,096 177,343 173,00

  5. Natural Gas Imports (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    272,846 251,070 240,010 240,684 248,319 241,16

  6. Nebraska Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    8 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.62 5.11 4.31 4.61 5.58 NA 1984-2015 Residential 8.95 8.84 8.68 8.39 8.77 8.94 1967-2015 Commercial 7.08 6.69 6.19 6.49 7.27 6.54 1967-2015 Industrial 5.85 5.61 4.34 4.72 5.69 4.61 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 15.10 15.29 1994-2012 Electric Power W 5.74 3.93 4.96 5.84 3.97 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 276 322 270 357 310 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 2,255 1,980 1,328 1,032 402 1967-2014 From Gas

  7. Nevada Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    NA 2006-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 7.19 6.77 5.13 5.16 5.90 4.06 1984-2015 Residential 12.25 10.66 10.14 9.42 11.44 11.82 1967-2015 Commercial 9.77 8.07 7.43 6.61 8.21 8.66 1967-2015 Industrial 10.53 8.99 7.34 6.66 7.83 8.12 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 8.13 4.76 8.97 1991-2012 Electric Power 5.75 5.00 3.49 W W 3.34 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 0 0 0 4 4 1996-2014 Gross Withdrawals 4 3 4 3 3 1991-2014 From Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 3

  8. Utah Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    23 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.53 5.68 5.50 5.70 5.74 5.70 1984-2015 Residential 8.22 8.44 8.70 8.55 9.48 9.72 1967-2015 Commercial 6.83 7.05 7.00 7.13 7.71 7.97 1967-2015 Industrial 5.57 5.50 4.69 5.22 5.83 5.89 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 11.61 13.01 15.02 1990-2012 Electric Power W W 3.04 4.10 W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 6,981 7,857 7,548 6,829 6,685 1977-2014 Adjustments -80 134 289 -582 -20 1977-2014 Revision

  9. Vermont Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    6.54 5.81 4.90 5.72 6.61 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1982-2005 Citygate 8.29 7.98 6.63 6.16 7.08 NA 1984-2015 Residential 16.14 16.17 16.73 15.87 14.68 14.56 1980-2015 Commercial 11.82 11.90 12.09 7.57 9.13 NA 1980-2015 Industrial 6.57 6.09 4.89 8.59 6.63 5.50 1997-2015 Electric Power 5.73 5.26 4.14 -- W -- 1997-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 8,895 10,319 8,247 10,324 10,621 1982-2014 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 8,443 8,611 8,191 9,602

  10. Virginia Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.88 6.64 5.64 5.54 5.98 4.87 1984-2015 Residential 12.73 12.72 12.42 11.68 12.07 11.58 1967-2015 Commercial 9.55 9.69 8.77 8.83 9.17 8.11 1967-2015 Industrial 6.68 6.44 5.29 6.02 6.43 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 4.31 4.55 15.16 1993-2012 Electric Power 5.72 W 3.38 4.29 6.12 3.55 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 3,215 2,832 2,579 2,373 2,800 1982-2014 Adjustments 59 -413 66 -9 89 1982-2014

  11. Washington Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.22 3.96 2.72 3.62 4.32 1989-2014 Exports 4.81 4.47 3.87 4.02 5.05 1998-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.29 5.55 4.48 4.89 5.82 4.42 1984-2015 Residential 12.24 12.30 11.87 11.37 10.59 10.61 1967-2015 Commercial 10.49 10.40 9.82 9.21 9.03 9.14 1967-2015 Industrial 9.37 9.47 8.77 8.37 8.55 8.71 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 12.89 9.88 11.06 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.52 W W W W W 1998-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 332,358 313,922 312,236 333,050 359,348

  12. Wyoming Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.30 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.04 4.65 4.03 4.51 5.27 4.36 1984-2015 Residential 8.58 8.72 8.42 8.27 9.34 9.19 1967-2015 Commercial 7.13 7.29 6.72 6.81 7.69 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 4.91 5.57 4.87 4.62 5.89 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 10.08 11.96 14.15 1991-2012 Electric Power W W W W W 5.18 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 35,074 35,290 30,094 33,618 27,553 1977-2014 Adjustments 521 -209 692 2,058 -1,877 1977-2014

  13. Vermont Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    5.52 5.98 6.93 4.85 4.96 4.24 1989-2016 Residential 13.24 12.53 12.66 13.30 14.26 18.40 1989-2016 Commercial 7.14 7.00 6.22 6.60 6.71 5.51 1989-2016 Industrial 5.14 5.17 4.96 4.93 5.13 4.97 2001-2016 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- -- 2002-2016 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 1,695 1,459 1,101 NA 652 566 2001-2016 Residential 576 541 380 357 196 109 1989-2016 Commercial 899 714 516 NA 286 306 1989-2016 Industrial 220 204 204 192 167 151 2001-2016 Vehicle Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0

  14. Wisconsin Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    67 3.92 3.73 3.17 3.67 4.12 1989-2016 Residential 7.46 7.24 7.39 7.57 8.63 10.56 1989-2016 Commercial 6.86 6.35 6.07 5.98 5.30 5.26 1989-2016 Industrial 5.75 5.46 4.95 5.06 3.98 3.45 2001-2016 Electric Power W W W W W W 2002-2016 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Consumers 66,422 57,410 49,673 39,929 NA NA 2001-2016 Residential 24,782 19,769 14,268 11,144 5,012 2,584 1989-2016 Commercial 15,417 13,091 9,179 7,139 4,535 3,134 1989-2016 Industrial 15,948 14,197 12,910 11,800 NA NA

  15. Natural Gas Exports (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    1,136,789 1,505,650 1,618,828 1,572,413 1,514,242 1,783,512 1973-2015 Alaska 30,100 16,398 9,342 0 13,310 1982-2014 Arizona 44,693 45,086 46,385 54,139 64,692 1982-2014 California 43,278 94,433 110,656 107,273 120,359 1982-2014 Idaho 12 10 0 6 0 1999-2014 Louisiana 22,814 38,552 7,655 0 0 2007-2014 Maine 452 1,028 6,952 13,539 2,911 2007-2014 Michigan 721,075 876,267 872,620 684,510 554,675 1982-2014 Minnesota 0 3,975 11,768 16,209 5,474 1999-2014 Montana 9,437 6,826 4,332 2,353 891 1982-2014

  16. Natural Gas Imports (Summary)

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3,740,757 3,468,693 3,137,789 2,883,355 2,695,378 2,718,094 1973-2015 California 22,503 2,171 0 23 0 2007-2014 Georgia 106,454 75,641 59,266 15,575 7,155 1999-2014 Idaho 708,806 606,099 634,194 686,449 608,147 1982-2014 Louisiana 90,867 60,554 20,132 5,750 5,880 1982-2014 Maine 131,035 149,736 76,540 55,248 79,892 1982-2014 Maryland 43,431 13,981 2,790 5,366 11,585 1999-2014 Massachusetts 164,984 135,278 86,609 63,987 28,825 1982-2014 Michigan 11,365 15,193 11,630 8,521 21,248 1982-2014

  17. Alabama Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    4.46 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.46 5.80 5.18 4.65 4.93 NA 1984-2015 Residential 15.79 15.08 16.20 15.47 14.59 13.95 1967-2015 Commercial 13.34 12.36 12.56 12.35 11.92 11.03 1967-2015 Industrial 6.64 5.57 4.35 4.98 5.49 3.94 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 16.24 11.45 17.99 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.85 W 3.09 4.14 4.74 3.06 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 2,629 2,475 2,228 1,597 2,036 1977-2014 Adjustments 32 -49 112 -274

  18. ,"Hawaii Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Annual",2015,"06301980" ,"Data 2","Consumption",8,"Annual",2015,"06301980" ,"Release Date:","05312016" ,"Next Release Date:","06302016" ,"Excel File Name:","ngsumlsumdcu...

  19. ,"Maine Natural Gas Summary"

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    ,"Excel File Name:","ngsumlsumdcusmem.xls" ,"Available from Web Page:","http:www.eia.govdnavngngsumlsumdcusmem.htm" ,"Source:","Energy Information ...

  20. Arizona Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    11 1967-2010 Exports 4.57 4.28 3.07 4.17 5.15 1989-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.59 5.91 4.68 4.73 5.20 NA 1984-2015 Residential 15.87 15.04 15.75 13.92 17.20 17.04 1967-2015 Commercial 10.72 9.99 9.35 8.76 10.34 10.53 1967-2015 Industrial 7.54 6.86 5.78 6.29 7.52 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 12.35 7.73 13.19 1991-2012 Electric Power 4.84 W 3.51 4.60 5.30 3.43 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 5 5 5 5 5 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 183

  1. Arkansas Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3.84 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.76 6.27 5.36 4.99 5.84 4.76 1984-2015 Residential 11.53 11.46 11.82 10.46 10.39 11.20 1967-2015 Commercial 8.89 8.90 7.99 7.68 7.88 8.08 1967-2015 Industrial 7.28 7.44 6.38 6.74 6.99 6.97 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- 9.04 1994-2012 Electric Power 5.11 W 3.19 4.32 W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 14,178 16,370 11,035 13,518 12,789 1977-2014 Adjustments -34 728 -743 -78 -3 1977-2014

  2. California Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    87 1967-2010 Imports 4.76 3.57 -- 3.59 -- 2007-2014 Exports 4.51 4.18 2.90 3.89 4.56 1997-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 4.86 4.47 3.46 4.18 4.88 3.27 1984-2015 Residential 9.92 9.93 9.14 9.92 11.51 11.38 1967-2015 Commercial 8.30 8.29 7.05 7.81 9.05 7.98 1967-2015 Industrial 7.02 7.04 5.77 6.57 7.65 6.35 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.55 7.32 7.01 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.99 4.71 3.68 4.53 5.23 3.39 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of

  3. Colorado Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    3.96 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.26 4.94 4.26 4.76 5.42 3.96 1984-2015 Residential 8.13 8.25 8.28 7.85 8.89 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 7.58 7.84 7.58 7.26 8.15 NA 1967-2015 Industrial 5.84 6.42 5.79 5.90 6.84 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 10.79 9.56 11.65 1990-2012 Electric Power 5.16 4.98 W 4.91 5.49 3.81 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 24,119 24,821 20,666 22,381 20,851 1977-2014 Adjustments 449 801 -363 -272 627

  4. Florida Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Wellhead NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.49 5.07 3.93 4.44 5.05 NA 1984-2015 Residential 17.89 18.16 18.34 18.46 19.02 19.29 1967-2015 Commercial 10.60 11.14 10.41 10.87 11.38 10.74 1967-2015 Industrial 8.33 8.07 6.96 6.77 6.89 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 17.98 5.56 9.83 1989-2012 Electric Power 6.54 5.86 4.80 5.08 5.58 4.41 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 56 6 16 15 0 1977-2014 Adjustments 64 -54 -2 1 -2 1977-2014

  5. Georgia Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Imports 4.39 4.20 2.78 3.36 4.33 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.93 5.19 4.35 4.66 5.19 3.82 1984-2015 Residential 15.17 15.72 16.23 14.60 14.45 15.06 1967-2015 Commercial 10.95 10.51 9.75 9.38 9.86 8.49 1967-2015 Industrial 6.25 5.90 4.61 5.38 6.07 NA 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.17 5.57 14.51 1993-2012 Electric Power 5.21 4.72 3.40 4.45 4.98 3.27 1997-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 106,454 75,641 59,266 15,575 7,155 1999-2014 Underground Storage

  6. Hawaii Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Citygate 22.94 31.58 32.39 28.45 26.94 18.11 1984-2015 Residential 44.50 55.28 52.86 49.13 47.51 40.00 1980-2015 Commercial 36.55 45.58 47.03 41.92 40.42 31.17 1980-2015 Industrial 24.10 29.80 30.89 27.56 26.75 18.81 1997-2015 Electric Power -- -- -- -- -- -- 2001-2015 Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Total Consumption 2,627 2,619 2,689 2,855 2,928 1997-2014 Pipeline & Distribution Use 2 2 3 1 1 2004-2014 Delivered to Consumers 2,625 2,616 2,687 2,853 2,927 2,929 1997-2015 Residential 509

  7. Idaho Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Imports 4.19 3.90 2.59 3.34 4.14 1989-2014 Exports 5.85 4.74 -- 3.27 -- 1999-2014 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 4.82 4.65 4.07 3.93 4.29 3.95 1984-2015 Residential 8.95 8.80 8.26 8.12 8.54 8.62 1967-2015 Commercial 8.21 8.09 7.35 7.29 7.70 7.61 1967-2015 Industrial 6.39 6.36 5.73 5.47 5.96 5.82 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 7.51 5.10 9.27 1994-2012 Electric Power W W W W W 2.89 2001-2015 Imports and Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Imports 708,806 606,099 634,194 686,449 608,147

  8. Indiana Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    13 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.52 4.97 4.23 4.38 5.63 NA 1984-2015 Residential 8.63 9.46 8.94 8.43 9.02 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 7.55 8.04 7.69 7.59 8.19 7.58 1967-2015 Industrial 5.65 6.53 6.19 6.54 7.45 6.29 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel 5.19 13.24 12.29 1990-2012 Electric Power 4.91 W W W W W 1997-2015 Production (Million Cubic Feet) Number of Producing Gas Wells 620 914 819 921 895 1989-2014 Gross Withdrawals 6,802 9,075 8,814 7,938 6,616 1967-2014 From Gas Wells

  9. Kansas Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    23 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 6.08 5.53 4.74 4.98 6.10 NA 1984-2015 Residential 10.61 9.93 10.12 10.19 10.59 NA 1967-2015 Commercial 9.65 8.89 8.82 9.07 9.53 8.83 1967-2015 Industrial 5.49 5.28 3.87 4.86 5.70 4.37 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- 9.87 9.00 1994-2012 Electric Power 5.05 4.79 3.28 4.57 5.65 3.95 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 3,673 3,486 3,308 3,592 4,359 1977-2014 Adjustments 140 125 -236 -20 94 1977-2014

  10. Kentucky Natural Gas Summary

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    47 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 5.69 5.18 4.17 4.47 5.16 NA 1984-2015 Residential 10.02 10.44 10.19 9.80 10.62 10.94 1967-2015 Commercial 8.61 8.79 8.28 8.32 9.04 8.80 1967-2015 Industrial 5.57 5.16 3.96 4.84 5.80 4.36 1997-2015 Vehicle Fuel -- -- -- 1992-2012 Electric Power W W W W W W 1997-2015 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 2,613 2,006 1,408 1,663 1,611 1977-2014 Adjustments -58 -34 -282 103 -9 1977-2014 Revision Increases