Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

NEPA Lessons Learned Second Quarter FY 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 1 6 1 (continued on page 4) Second Quarter FY 2006 June 1, 2006; Issue No. 47 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A Quality + Leadership = NEPA Success NEPA 35 Earns Special Award from NAEP; see page 3 DOE's NEPA Compliance Offi cers discussed quality assurance during the interactive meeting of more than

2

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter FY 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SEPTEMBER 1998 1 SEPTEMBER 1998 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT DOE NEPA Community to Meet in October For Third Quarter FY 1998 September 1, 1998, Issue No. 16 On October 14 and 15, 1998, the DOE NEPA Community will meet in North Las Vegas, hosted by the Nevada Operations Office at its new Support Facility. The Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance is sponsoring this meeting to improve DOE NEPA performance through sharing of lessons learned and discussion of current issues. Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process The meeting will focus on issues that NEPA Document Managers face daily: What tools and techniques can help

3

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

. . National Environmental Policy Act N E P . A LESSONS Office of NEPA LEARNED QUARTERLY REPORT 1ST QUARTER FY 1995 Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy March 1,1995 ODU- To foster continuing improvement of the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA, issued June 13, 1994, requires the Office of Environment Safety and Health to solicit comments from the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Officer, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement and environmental assessment on lessons learned in the process, and to distribute a quarterly summary to all,NEPA Compliance Officers and NEPA Document Managers. This second quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between October 1 and December 31, 1994. It is based on responses to the revised

4

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report June 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Second Quarter FY 2001 June 1, 2001; Issue No. 27 continued on page 3 The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, on the theme of “NEPA: What’s New, What’s Next.” Horst Greczmiel, CEQ’s Associate Director for NEPA Oversight, and Anne Miller, Acting Director of the EPA’s Office of Federal

5

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1994  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LESSONS LEARNED QUARTERLY REPORT 4TH QUARTER FY1994 Oflicx of NEPA Oversight U.S. Department of Energy December ~ 1994 INTRODUCTION . To fdster continuing improvementof the Department's National Environmental policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEP& issued June 13, 1994, requires the OffIceof Environment StUetyand Health to soiicit comments tkom the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Offker, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement and environmental assessment on lessons learned in the proces~ and to distribute a -Y SUmmW tOall NEpA Gmplf-c Offfcem and NEPA Document Managem On August Q 1994 the Oftice of NEPA Oversight distributed an interhddraft kSSOI.W ]WImed questionnaire to NEPA contacts to be used for reporting on environmental impact statements and environmental assessments approvedbetween

6

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report 1st Quarter FY 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A Inside LESSONS LEARNED March 1, 1996 Quarterly Report LESSONS LEARNED National Environmental Policy Act U.S. Department of Energy Welcome to the newly-revised Quarterly Report of Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. In response to reader suggestions, we have expanded the scope of the report to provide a wider variety of NEPA- related information, and enhanced the format for better clarity and overall readability. This Quarterly Report includes: * NEPA lessons learned at the Hanford Site - Page 1 * Mini-guidance on the preparation of EIS summaries, properly eliminating alternatives and impacts from detailed analysis, application of DOE NEPA regulations to procurement, and NEPA questions and answers - Pages 3-6 * Updates on the proposed amendments to DOE's NEPA

7

NEPA Lessions Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DECEMBER 1998 DECEMBER 1998 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Fourth Quarter FY 1998 December 1, 1998, Issue No. 17 New and Improved NEPA Compliance Guide Issued in 2 Volumes A new and improved DOE NEPA Compliance Guide, issued by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, has been distributed to about 750 members of the DOE NEPA Community. Intended to foster sound and efficient NEPA compliance, the Compliance Guide is a collection of resources and references to aid in NEPA document preparation and other aspects of the NEPA process. Volume I, General NEPA References, contains the statute, and regulations and guidance from the Council on Environmental Quality, the Department of State, and the

8

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report. December 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 1 5 1 More Inside on NEPA 35 CEQ Chairman Connaughton's Address ......... 5 Plenary Sessions.............................................. 6 Training Sessions .......................................... 14 Breakout Sessions ......................................... 15 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2005 December 5, 2005; Issue No. 45

9

NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This document contains a compilation of NEPA "success stories" that were featured in DOE Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports (LLQRs). Feature articles in LLQR have described how the NEPA process provided an organized structure for making some of the Department's most complex decisions. NEPA reviews have resulted in significant project cost savings through informed decision making. Some articles have highlighted ways in which the NEPA process improved environmental outcomes, such as by identifying better alternatives or more effective mitigation. Some articles have put the spotlight on procedural success, such as effective public

10

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report December 2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Fourth Quarter FY 2000 December 1, 2000; Issue No. 25 DOE NEPA Order Revised, National Nuclear Security Administration Responsibilities Outlined On October 26, 2000, the Deputy Secretary of Energy issued DOE O 451.1B, National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program, to accommodate National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) NEPA responsibilities. The revised Order has an expanded section on applicability and a new section on NNSA procedures. With respect to an EIS for an NNSA activity, the NNSA Administrator will fulfill the responsibilities of a Secretarial Officer (including consulting with the NNSA General Counsel), and the Secretary or Deputy

11

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Decisionmakers Decisionmakers States/Local Governm ents Agencies Academ icians Congress Framers of NEPA Drafters of CEQ Regs Native Am erican Tribes La wyers NGOs/ Citizen Groups Businesses Council on Environmental Quality NEPA Effectiveness Study Partners continued next page -- Improved Implementation Needed -- -- DOE Leadership Highlighted -- CEQ Study: NEPA a "Success" Overall National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. Department of Energy Quarterly Report LESSONS LEARNED LESSONS LEARNED For First Quarter FY 1997 March 3, 1997 The President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued in January the results of its extensive study on the effectiveness of the National Environmental Policy Act during the statute's 25-year history. From the cover letter by CEQ Chair Kathleen McGinty to its four short appendices, the 50-page booklet entitled The National Environmental

12

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter FY 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 1999 September 1999 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Third Quarter FY 1999 September 1, 1999; Issue No. 20 Proposed Arizona-Mexico Transmission Project Presents Challenges to NEPA Process and Analysis By: Ellen Russell, NEPA Document Manager, Fossil Energy with Carolyn Osborne, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance continued on page 3 Fossil Energy (FE) is preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS) for what would be the first cross-border high-voltage transmission project to connect the main power delivery systems of the United States and Mexico (DOE/EIS-0307). EIS scoping has been complex. Through the scoping process, FE has identified and worked with many stakeholders to define a broad range

13

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY2000  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2000 2000 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For First Quarter FY 2000 March 1, 2000; Issue No. 22 Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS Helps DOE Preserve Unique Resources continued on page 4 By: Thomas W. Ferns, NEPA Document Manager, Richland Operations Office, and Yardena Mansoor, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance A 50-year land-use plan for the Hanford Site? Some said it couldn't be done. Too many factions, they said, with irreconcilably different visions for the future. Would NEPA be a help or a hindrance in developing such a land-use plan? It turns out that the Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS Record of Decision (ROD) (64 FR 61615; November 12, 1999) marks the end of a successful, albeit

14

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Questionnaire | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Questionnaire NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Questionnaire NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Questionnaire This questionnaire is used to collect information from the Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Community. In accordance with DOE Order 451.1B, NEPA Compliance Program, NEPA Document Managers and NEPA Compliance Officers should fill out a questionnaire (separately or jointly) as soon as possible after completing each environmental impact statement (EIS) and environmental assessment (EA). Questionaires also may be returned earlier, at any time during the NEPA process, to share valuable lessons learned with others. Other document preparation team members also are encouraged to submit a questionnaire. Information provided through this questionaire helps the Office of NEPA

15

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter FY 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 1999 June 1999 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Second Quarter FY 1999 June 1, 1999; Issue No. 19 continued on page 6 NEPA and Habitat Management Plan: Environmental Synergy By: Elizabeth Withers, NEPA Compliance Officer, Los Alamos Area Office, with John Stetson, Pacific Western Technologies, Ltd. On the day DOE issued the Draft EIS for the Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), LANL biologists discovered a nesting pair of Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida) – which had only recently been listed as threatened – in the canyons directly below the proposed site. Today, this nest site, at the edge

16

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 1999 December 1999 1 continued on page 3 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Fourth Quarter FY 1999 December 1, 1999; Issue No. 21 Good Information, Good Government Using Technology to Improve NEPA Decisionmaking provides a comprehensive guide to Federal environmental information resources available electronically and to useful Web sites provided by nongovernmental groups and professional organizations. “One of the foundations of good government is good information,” President Clinton observed. NEPA is “at its core, a mandate for informed, democratic decisionmaking. And its contribution to environmental protection is incalculable.” Managing a National Public Participation

17

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY 1999  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For First Quarter FY 1999 March 1, 1999; Issue No. 18 continued on page 3 Dr. David Michaels, new Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health, enthusiastically supports the Lessons Learned approach. Dr. David Michaels — DOE’s New Leader for Environment, Safety and Health The new Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health, Dr. David Michaels, recognizes the value of NEPA in supporting good decisions. “I understand the importance of examining options carefully before we make decisions that will affect our workers, the public, and the environment in lasting and profound ways,” he said. “We must be fully informed of the environmental

18

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report September 2001, No. 27, Third Quarter FY 2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA NEPA Lessons Lear ned September 2001 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Third Quarter FY 2001 September 4, 2001; Issue No. 28 continued on page 2 NEPA Compliance Officers Consider Further Improvements "What's New, What's Next," was the theme of the Department of Energy (DOE) NEPA Compliance Officers (NCOs) meeting on June 13 and 14, 2001, in Washington, DC. Convened by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, the meeting involved 70 participants including Program and Field Office NCOs, Headquarters NEPA attorneys, and others. In welcoming participants, Carol Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, recounted recent goals for DOE's NEPA Compliance Program before considering new challenges. She noted that in the 1990s, the Department achieved significant improvements

19

NEPA Lessons Learned Third Quarter FY 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 1 6 1 a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (Rail Alignment EIS, in preparation). Other elements of the court order also are of general interest to NEPA practitioners, including those related to the "hard look" standard, expressions of an agency's preferred alternative, and the need for potential plaintiffs to raise concerns during the NEPA process.

20

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter FY 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA and Contracting Communities NEPA and Contracting Communities Take Action Following Workshops Innovative ideas for improving the Department’s NEPA contracting process emerged from the first gathering of field office and headquarters NEPA and procurement specialists at a workshop sponsored by the Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance, in partnership with the Office of Human Resources and Administration and the Office of General Counsel. The March 1996 NEPA Contracting Reform Workshop explored the theme of “Do It Right the First Time,” the central recommendation of the Phase II NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance that the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health issued in December 1995. The March Workshop’s purpose was to identify contracting actions that can achieve NEPA process cost savings through better management of existing contracts and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

First Quarter FY 2007, NEPA Lessons Learned  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

is to our own NEPA process. The project called "Nord Stream" 1 is a 1,320-mile natural gas proposal (573 miles in Russia and 747 miles under the Baltic Sea) consisting of two...

22

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

continued next page continued next page Theme of October NEPA Compliance Officers Meeting Leading members of DOE’s NEPA community shared professional experiences and reflected upon job challenges at the DOE NEPA Compliance Officers (NCO) meeting held in Washington, DC on October 29-30. In addition to 29 NCOs, the participants included staff from the Offices of NEPA Policy and Assistance and the Assistant General Counsel for Environment. The meeting featured informal small group discussions, rather than presentations to a large audience. The meeting examined NCO and Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) roles and responsibilities, NEPA contracting reform, and how to get the most from programmatic NEPA documents. An early brainstorming session elicited aspects of the DOE NEPA compliance

23

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1, 2004; Issue No. 38; First Quarter FY 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2004 March 2004 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT First Quarter FY 2004 March 1, 2004; Issue No. 38 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS Need Help Preparing NEPA Documents? New, Improved "Green Book" Is on the Way (continued on page 15) By: Carl Sykes, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Carl Sykes is leading the charge to strengthen the Green Book, DOE's NEPA primer. The time has come for the DOE NEPA Community to work together to strengthen our basic NEPA guidebook, Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements (also known as the "Green Book"). The Green Book (www.eh.doe.gov/nepa under Guidance) is certainly no weakling: it provides succinct recommendations for key

24

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1, 2005; Issue No. 43; Second Quarter FY 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 1 5 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Second Quarter FY 2005 June 1, 2005; Issue No. 43 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS (continued on page 4) Who Has More Than 500 Years of NEPA Experience? A Closer Look at the DOE NEPA Compliance Officers Who are these 47 individuals? What inspires their commitment to the environment? How do they carry out

25

NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Learned September 2009 1 Learned September 2009 1 Third Quarter FY 2009 September 1, 2009; Issue No. 60 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A DOE General Counsel Scott Blake Harris Aims To Improve the NEPA Review Process In his first month on the job, DOE's new General Counsel, Scott Blake Harris, issued operating principles for NEPA document review by the Office of General Counsel (GC) to reduce the time required for such reviews and avoid multiple rounds of comments, particularly for

26

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter FY 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

For Inside LESSONS LEARNED For Inside LESSONS LEARNED See Page 2 Do you need an environmental assessment, environmental impact statement, environmental report or a portion of one? Would you like to begin work within a few weeks? Would you like to use the best, most experienced contractors at unbeatable prices? Do you want to fully control your NEPA contracting locally? We will soon have contracts that will let you do all this and more! This may sound too good to be true, but the hard work of the DOE-wide NEPA Contract Source Evaluation Panel (and many others in the NEPA contract reform initiative) have made this dream a reality. The Panel, chaired by Roger Twitchell, NEPA Compliance Officer, Idaho Operations Office, has implemented ideas first discussed at the NEPA Contracting Reform Workshop in

27

NEPA Lessons Learned Third Quarter 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2007 1 Third Quarter FY 2007 September 4, 2007; Issue No. 52 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 4) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has announced its plan to evaluate eight DOE sites and two generic locations for the proposed disposal of about 5,600 cubic meters

28

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, First Quarter FY 2005 (March 1, 2005)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 1 5 1 Green Book, Second Edition, Issued; see page 4 New Assistant Secretary Shaw Promotes NEPA as Essential to Energy Mission and Goals National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT First Quarter FY 2005 March 1, 2005; Issue No. 42 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS (continued on page 3) In a recent interview for Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, John Spitaleri Shaw, the new Assistant Secretary for

29

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Third Quarter FY 2003 (September2, 2003)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2003 September 2003 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Third Quarter FY 2003 September 2, 2003; Issue No. 36 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS DOE NEPA Community Gauges Progress In Its Continuing Pursuit of Excellence continued on page 3 "I believe we will never get to a point where we say this is done, there is nothing left to learn." - Beverly Cook "Are We There Yet?" - that is, has DOE achieved its goals for NEPA process improvement? - was the theme of the DOE NEPA Community Meeting on July 15 and 16, 2003. Participants considered DOE's NEPA performance with respect to multiple objectives using a variety of measures, finding both substantial progress and room for improvement. The meeting included

30

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Issue No. 37; Fourth Quarter FY 2003 (12/1/03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2003 December 2003 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2003 December 1, 2003; Issue No. 37 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS What's Next? CEQ Seeks More Input on Task Force Recommendations continued on page 3 NEPA practitioners, agencies, special interest groups, and the general public are reacting to recommendations intended to improve and modernize NEPA implementation presented in the NEPA Task Force Report to the Council on Environmental Quality: Modernizing NEPA Implementation, issued in September 2003. Through a series of meetings and regional roundtable discussions, CEQ is now seeking broad input on what should be done, how it should be done, and with what priority. Noting that the Report was to,

31

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Third Quarter 2000 (09/01/00)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Lessons Learned September 2000 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Third Quarter FY 2000 September 1, 2000; Issue No. 24 NEPA staff positions open. Apply by September 8. See page 2. Emergency NEPA Procedures Invoked for Actions Taken after Los Alamos Fire To avert further harm in the wake of the May 2000 Los Alamos wildfire, DOE is taking emergency actions with potentially significant impacts, without preparing an EIS. Instead, DOE is proceeding under “alternative arrangements” to comply with NEPA, as provided under 40 CFR 1506.11, a section of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA regulations that deals with emergency circumstances. The specific alternative

32

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Fourth Quarter FY 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 1 6 1 Fourth Quarter FY 2006 December 1, 2006; Issue No. 49 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 6) Scoping Process Underway for Two Yucca Mountain EISs The Department of Energy (DOE) recently initiated public scoping for two EISs related to Yucca Mountain, the Nation's proposed repository for disposal of commercial

33

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Second Quarter FY 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 1 7 1 Second Quarter FY 2007 June 1, 2007; Issue No. 51 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A We have all been told to "work together" to accomplish a particular goal. Together Everyone Achieves More illustrates the benefi ts of "teamwork." Federal agencies, including the Council on Environmental Quality

34

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Issue No. 41; Fourth Quarter FY 2004; December 1, 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 1 4 1 The EIS Comment-Response Process Guidance Issued; see page 9 Putting the Web to Work for NEPA National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2004 December 1, 2004; Issue No. 41 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS (continued on page 4) "What's your e-mail address? Do you have a Web site?" These are common questions in

35

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY 1998  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 1998 1 March 1998 1 continued on page 2 For First Quarter FY 1998 March 2, 1998, Issue No. 14 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A LESSONS LEARNED LESSONS LEARNED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Managing Progress on the Repository EIS How to Move a Mountain Tour members approach the entry to the Yucca Mountain Exploratory Studies Facility. The EIS Management Council, along with members and technical advisors of the EIS Preparation Team, visited the site in January while participating in briefings on technical, legal, and policy issues. How do you manage preparation of a major EIS that is important to five Program Offices, four Field Offices, and other Federal agencies, not to mention a wide array of stakeholders? How do you address extremely complex and

36

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 1997 December 1997 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A LESSONS LEARNED LESSONS LEARNED For Fourth Quarter FY 1997 December 1, 1997, Issue No. 13 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT continued on page 2 I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£ I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£ I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£ I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£ I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£W W W W Whyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq hyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq hyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq hyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq hyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r The endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox would continue to be protected after sale of NPR-1. (Photo courtesy of

37

NEPA Lessons Learned Cumulative Index December 2012 1 DOE NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cumulative Index December 2012 1 Cumulative Index December 2012 1 DOE NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report A Accident Analyses Sep 95/12; Dec 95/15; Sep 97/7; Sep 98/7; Dec 98/5; Jun 00/3, 8 guidance issued for preparation of Sep 02/16; Dec 02/20 Adaptive Management also see: Environmental Management Systems Dec 02/8; Jun 07/17; Jun 08/8 training Dec 06/16 Administrative Record also see: Legal Issues Mar 97/13; Sep 97/7; Jun 98/7; Dec 98/4 Advisory Council on Historic Preservation also see: National Historic Preservation Act Dec 98/11; Jun 99/3; Sep 99/2; Dec 00/6; Jun 01/8; Dec 01/6; Sep 02/17; Dec 03/13; Sep 04/16 Affected Environment Sep 95/12; Dec 98/7; Sep 00/8 Air Force Sep 11/10 Alternative Arrangements (emergency actions) see: Council on Environmental Quality: alternative arrangements

38

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (03/01), Issue No. 26  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2001 March 2001 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For First Quarter FY 2001 March 1, 2001; Issue No. 26 continued on page 3 By: Paul Bayer, NEPA Document Manager, and Clarence Hickey, NEPA Compliance Officer, Office of Science Innovative Field Research Benefits from NEPA Review The high costs and long times frequently needed to clean up contaminated Department of Energy (DOE) sites have created a demand for better and cheaper cleanup technologies. A promising new method for cleaning up subsurface contamination is bioremediation. However, field experience to validate laboratory results is lacking. Preparing an environmental assessment (EA) helped DOE's Office of Science plan an effective field-based

39

June 1,1998, Issue No. 15 For Second Quarter FY 1998 NEPA Compliance Officers Meet in DC  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

,1998, Issue No. 15 For Second Quarter FY 1998 ,1998, Issue No. 15 For Second Quarter FY 1998 NEPA Compliance Officers Meet in DC How can NEPA Compliance Officers (NCOs) become more effective? What can the Offices of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) and General Counsel (GC) do to better support the NCOs? Field and Program NCOs and staff of the Offces of NEPA Policy and Assistance and the Assistant General Counsel for Environment met in Washington, DC, on March 26 and 27 to explore these questions. needs for their Offices and spoke of the value of the Lessons Learned Quarterly Report in Department-wide NEPA coordination. NCOs with tasks under the DOE-wide NEPA support contracts expressed satisfaction that the expected benefits (reduced time and cost) are materializing. A panel told of experiences integrating

40

NEPA Project quarterly progress report, April 1--June 30, 1950  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Exploration of various types of power plant cycles for nuclear propelled aircraft has been continued during this quarter. The principal current objective of the project is the development of information which will make an intelligent choice of the basic power plant cycle possible. It is still hoped that this choice can be made late in 1950. The survey studies which have been under way for several months continued during the quarter. These consist of analyses and rough preliminary layouts for various types of aircraft, using each of the several basic cycles which have been seriously considered for each of the three phases of development. Although it is still extremely premature to discuss the relative merits of the various cycles, the information so for developed discloses some cycle differences which may, if confirmed by additional work, be significant. In this respect, there have been no recent major changes in the comparative standings of the cycles.

NONE

1950-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, First Quarter FY 2006; Issue No. 46; March 1, 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 1 6 1 below, the Agreement emphasizes transparency and quality assurance in the NEPA process. Secretary Samuel W. Bodman, in announcing the Agreement on January 9, 2006, said both parties "will be able to shift their focus and resources away from litigation and toward partnership and our shared cleanup goals." At the same time, Jay Manning, Director, Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology),

42

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 3, 2008; Issue No. 54; First Quarter FY 2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

08 1 08 1 First Quarter FY 2008 March 3, 2008; Issue No. 54 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 3) Programmatic EIS on Nuclear Weapons Complex Draws National Interest, Many Comments Dinah Bear, General Counsel Council on Environmental Quality Anne Norton Miller, Director Offi ce of Federal Activities

43

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; March 3, 2009; Issue No. 58; First Quarter FY 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2009 March 2009 1 The Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for more than $45 billion of the $787 billion economic stimulus funding contained in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act), which President Barack Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009 (Public Law 111-5). The President and Congress have emphasized urgency in getting this money into the economy in order to create jobs. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has set a goal to disburse 70 percent of the funds by the end of 2010. Achieving this goal requires the timely completion of all requirements, including compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The DOE Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance and the

44

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report 1st Quarter FY 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Success Stories: Success Stories: Articles from Department of Energy NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports 1996 Mar Hanford Tanks Public participation in NEPA process resulted in changes to the scope of the proposed project. The NEPA process resulted in enforceable mitigation commitments. 1997 Dec NPR Sale The NEPA process resulted in enforceable mitigation commitments for biological and cultural resources. 1999 Mar SPR Pipeline Integrating NEPA and the Section 404 permit processes proved efficient and resulted in mitigation commitments. 1999 Jun LANL Habitat Plan The NEPA process resulted in a site-wide habitat management plan (reducing future need for biological assessments), geographic information system (reference for future project analyses), and endangered species protection.

45

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Second Quarter FY 2003; June 2, 2003; Issue No. 35  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 2003 June 2003 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Second Quarter FY 2003 June 2, 2003; Issue No. 35 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS Responding to Comments Is Work, But It Makes the NEPA Process Work continued on page 3 Ray Berube Retires Beverly Cook, Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health, wishes Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment Ray Berube well on his retirement. See tribute on page 19. Considering comments received on a draft EIS, and responding to those comments appropriately in the final EIS, can be a daunting task. Even a "great" draft EIS can generate lots of public comment. At times, the process of collecting, sorting, reviewing, and responding to public comments is complex and time-consuming.

46

Permits  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Other Permits Permits We are committed to meeting our environmental requirements for air, waste, and water quality permitting. Contact Environmental Communication & Public...

47

Coordinating Permit Office | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Coordinating Permit Office Coordinating Permit Office Home Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 9 July, 2013 - 20:57 GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Alaska analysis appropriations Categorical Exclusions Coordinating Permit Office Cost Mechanisms Cost Recovery geothermal Hawaii NEPA permitting quarterly meeting White Papers On June 26th, we held the 3rd Quarter GRR Stakeholder Update at the Grand Sierra Resort in Reno, NV. The meeting was well-attended with over 40 attendees, including in-person and webinar attendance. Thanks to all who attended! Files: application/pdf icon Presentation: 3rd Quarterly Stakeholder Update Meeting application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation icon Mock-up: GRR Permitting Wizard Interface Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155)

48

NEPA Lessons Learned, September 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 1 5 1 Register through the DOE NEPA Conference Web site at www.NEPA35.org National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Third Quarter FY 2005 September 1, 2005; Issue No. 44 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS To observe the 35th anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environment, Safety

49

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Lessons Learned Quarterly Report DOE's NEPA Lessons Learned Program was initiated in 1994 to foster continuous improvement in NEPA compliance by measuring DOE NEPA performance and gathering information learned through NEPA experience. The Program collects and publishes time and cost metrics to help DOE objectively focus on controlling these aspects of its NEPA compliance, and disseminates information broadly relevant to NEPA implementation, such guidance on public participation and interagency coordination procedures. The keystone of DOE's NEPA Lessons Learned Program is the Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR). The LLQR is produced as a means of disseminating NEPA program metrics, along with related guidance, case studies, analysis,

50

NEPA Lessons Learned June 2010 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

10 1 10 1 Second Quarter FY 2010 June 1, 2010; Issue No. 63 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A To mark the 40 th anniversary of NEPA, the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance is inviting distinguished NEPA practitioners to share their thoughts on the occasion. In this issue, Anne Norton Miller, former Director of the Office of

51

NEPA Updates  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance maintains two subscription services which provide you with a central notification system for both: - "DOE NEPA News", which includes general announcements, and - "DOE NEPA - Latest Documents and Notices", which includes all new project documents and notices posted on this website. -You can subscribe to either or both of these services by clicking on panels above.

52

quarterly meeting | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

24 24 Varnish cache server Home Groups Community Central Green Button Applications Developer Utility Rate FRED: FRee Energy Database More Public Groups Private Groups Features Groups Blog posts Content Stream Documents Discussions Polls Q & A Events Notices My stuff Energy blogs 429 Throttled (bot load) Error 429 Throttled (bot load) Throttled (bot load) Guru Meditation: XID: 2142234924 Varnish cache server quarterly meeting Home Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 9 July, 2013 - 20:57 GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Alaska analysis appropriations Categorical Exclusions Coordinating Permit Office Cost Mechanisms Cost Recovery geothermal Hawaii NEPA permitting quarterly meeting White Papers On June 26th, we held the 3rd Quarter GRR Stakeholder Update at the Grand

53

GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting GRR 2nd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Home > Groups > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 2 May, 2013 - 14:06 analysis Categorical Exclusions Coordinating Permit Office Cost Mechanisms Cost Recovery geothermal NEPA permitting quarterly meeting White Papers Last week, we held the GRR Stakeholder Update at the Denver Renaissance Hotel in Denver, CO. The meeting was well-attended with over 50 attendees, including in-person and webinar attendance. Thanks to all who attended! Presentation During the meeting, we reviewed the current status of the GRR efforts, including: * Roadmap Development: expansion to Colorado and Texas * Regulatory Analyses: including NEPA, Funding Mechanisms, and Permit Coordination Offices

54

CEQ NEPA & EMS Guide Overview  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CEQ Publishes NEPA-EMS Guide CEQ Publishes NEPA-EMS Guide "The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has published Aligning NEPA Processes with Environmental Management Systems - A Guide for NEPA and EMS Practitioner. This guide provides practitioners with a tool to improve NEPA implementation and achieve the environmental sustainability goals laid out in NEPA and Executive Order 13423: 'to create and maintain conditions, under which humans and nature can exist in productive harmony, that permit fulfilling the social, economic, and other requirements of present and future generations of Americans.'" James L. Connaughton Chairman, CEQ * CEQ's goal is to continue developing tools to improve and modernize NEPA. This Guide was developed help practitioners make NEPA implementation more effective and

55

NEPA Success Stories and Benefits | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Success Stories and Benefits NEPA Success Stories and Benefits NEPA Success Stories and Benefits September 16, 2013 Examples of Benefits from the NEPA process for ARRA funded activities Efforts to implement the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) include ensuring, and reporting on, timely NEPA reviews prepared in support of projects and activities funded under major provisions of ARRA. In addition to reporting on the status of the NEPA environmental reviews, agencies also report on the benefits of NEPA. September 16, 2013 NEPA Success Stories: Celebrating 40 Years of Transparency and Open Government NEPA Success Stories: Celebrating 40 Years of Transparency and Open Government, Environmental Law Institute, 2010. February 27, 2013 NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports

56

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 1, 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 Welcome to the 50th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance...

57

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 1, 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2000 Welcome to the 25th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. September 1, 2000 Lessons Learned...

58

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned September 6, 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 Welcome to the 76th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue...

59

NEPA Database | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

NEPA Database NEPA Database Home > Groups > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 25 February, 2013 - 10:19 data NEPA quarterly meeting We are in the process of working with federal agencies (DOE, BLM, USFS) and their local offices to collect detailed information about Geothermal NEPA documents, including applications that triggered the documents, relevant dates, agencies, stipulations, conditions and mitigation measures. The collection of these data will allow us to analyze (with real data) NEPA timelines and processes. These data will be posted on OpenEI after they are collected. We plan to present the preliminary results of this work at our next quarterly meeting in April for public feedback and comment. Groups: Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap

60

NEPA Documentation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Note for: Cynthia Quarterman Note for: Cynthia Quarterman Keith Harper From: Carol Borgstrom Subject: NEPA Documentation Date: December 3, 2008 Attached, per your request, are two lists: (1) DOE environmental assessments (EAs) issued since 12/1/2006 and (2) DOE environmental impact statements (EISs) issued since 12/1/2006. Also, per your request, is a copy of a general NEPA briefing provided to the Acting Deputy Secretary in May 2008. Please let me know if you have any further questions (carol.borgstrom @hq.doe.gov; 202-586-4600). cc: Ingrid Kolb, MA-1 (without attachments) Janet Barsy, GC-1 EA Database Listing Document Start FONSI Months Total NEPA Cost Program Number Title Date Date Complete Ops Office Office DOE/EA-1389 Charlie Creek-Williston Transmission 3/20/2001 2/20/2008 83.2 $345,236.21 WAPA

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 10, 2014 EIS-0488: FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 10, 2014

62

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 17, 2014 EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 15, 2014 EIS-0460: Record of Decision

63

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Section 1222 of the Energy Policy Act 2005 International Electricity Regulation Presidential Permits Export Authorizations Pending Applications NEPA Other Regulatory...

64

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2001 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2001 Welcome to the 29th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Included in this issue: CEQ Chair Describes Goals, Supports NEPA Principles DOE NEPA Post-9/11: Reconciling the Need to Protect and the Need to Inform the Public Agencies Responses to Terrorist Attacks Forest Service Succeeds with NEPA Training Oak Ridge Holds NEPA Community Meeting DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Training Opportunities New on the NEPA Bookshelf Litigation Update EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Recent EIS-Related Milestones Fourth Quarter FY 2001 Questionnaire Results NEPA Document Cost and Time Facts

65

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1998 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 1998 September 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1998 Welcome to the third quarter FY 1998 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: DOE NEPA Community to Meet in October Guidance Underway to Assist NEPA Process National Academy of Public Administration Examines the DOE NEPA Process NEPA Practitioners Bookshelf Publishing a Draft EIS on the Web DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Showing Benefits NAEP Conference in San Diego Litigation Updates Presidential Memorandum on Plain Language Third Quarter FY 1998 Questionnaire Results NEPA Document Cost and Time Facts NEPA Documents Completed EIS-related Documents Recent Milestones Cumulative Index Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2002

66

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2001 Welcome to the 27th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. March 1, 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 Welcome to the 26th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. December 1, 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2000 Welcome to the 25th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. September 1, 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2000 Welcome to the 24th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Note that this issue includes a cumulative index covering the past six years of reports. June 1, 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2000 Welcome to the 23rd quarterly report on lessons learned in theNEPA process.

67

http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/process/ll/95q3.htm  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3RD 3RD QUARTER FY 1995 Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy September 1, 1995 INTRODUCTION To foster continuing improvement of the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA, issued June 13, 1994, requires the Office of Environment, Safety and Health to solicit comments on lessons learned in the process of completing NEPA documents from the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Officer, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement (EIS) and environmental assessment (EA), and to distribute a quarterly summary to all NEPA Compliance Officers and NEPA Document Managers. This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between April 1 and June

68

http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/process/ll/95q4.htm  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4TH 4TH QUARTER FY 1995 Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy December 1, 1995 INTRODUCTION To foster continuing improvement of the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA, issued June 13, 1994, requires the Office of Environment, Safety and Health to solicit comments on lessons learned in the process of completing NEPA documents from the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Officer, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement (EIS) and environmental assessment (EA), and to distribute a quarterly summary to all NEPA Compliance Officers and NEPA Document Managers. This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between July 1 and

69

Transmission/Nepa Database | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Nepa Database Nepa Database < Transmission Jump to: navigation, search NepaHeader.png Transmission Dashboard Permitting Atlas Compare States Arizona California Colorado Idaho Montana Nevada New Mexico Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Resource Library NEPA Database Document Collections (1) Have a NEPA Document Collection to add that doesn't yet exist in this collection? Make sure it doesn't already exist: Please be sure to search this page by serial number and by document number Add.png Add a new NEPA Document Collection This query has been included to allow you to use the black arrows in the table header cells to sort the table data. Document Name Serial Number Analysis Type Transmission Type Project Area Applicant Lead Agency District Office Project Phase(s) TransWest EIS 600kV Wyoming Western Power Administration BLM BLM Wyoming State Office

70

NEPA Lessons Learned March 2011 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 1 1 First Quarter FY 2011 March 1, 2011; Issue No. 66 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A DOE's publication of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the Department's NEPA regulations marks a major milestone in updating its categorical exclusions (CXs). Since DOE last revised the "classes of actions" in

71

NEPA Lessons Learned March 2010 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 1 0 1 First Quarter FY 2010 March 1, 2010; Issue No. 62 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 18) The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) marked the 40 th anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and of CEQ itself, with a celebratory symposium and reception in Washington, DC, on February 18, 2010.

72

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

defining early what contractors should accomplish < establishing contracts ahead of time < minimizing cost while maintaining quality by * maximizing competition and use of incentives * using past performance information in awarding work * managing the NEPA process as a project This guidance provides: < model statements of work < information on contract types and incentives < direction on effective NEPA contract management by the NEPA Document Manager < a system for measuring NEPA process costs < NEPA contractor evaluation procedures < details on the DOE NEPA Web site U.S. Department of Energy, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance, December 1996 NEPA CONTRACTING REFORM GUIDANCE Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2012 This issue features successful practices from recent NEPA reviews and current Council on Environmental Quality initiatives promoting efficient NEPA compliance. Articles in this issue include: Keys to Managing an Expanded NEPA Workload Recent NEPA Reviews Ilustrate Lessons Learned NEPA Order Revision Incorporates Public Review of EAs Bureau of Reclamation Updates NEPA Handbook CEQ Expands NEPA Modernization Activities CEQ Draft Guidance Promotes Efficiencies CEQ Selects Pilot Projects DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Update NEPA Contracts: Task Ordering Process Most DOE EISs Involve Cooperating Agencies Annual Planning Summaries Transitions Litigation Updates 2012 National Environmental Justice Conference Training Opportunities

74

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 This issue highlights practices of DOE's NEPA Community that help ensure the quality of our NEPA reviews. Emphasizing quality throughout the NEPA process is essential to meeting schedules and providing useful information to the public and decisionmakers. Articles in this issue include: Quality Assurance Integral to NEPA Implementation DOE NEPA Guidance Plans OMB-CEQ Affirm Commitment to ECR Canada's New NEPA-Like Law Transitions John Jediny Joins DOE NEPA Office EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts LLQR-2012-Q4-r1.pdf More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2013

75

GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting Home > Groups > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 9 July, 2013 - 20:57 Alaska analysis appropriations Categorical Exclusions Coordinating Permit Office Cost Mechanisms Cost Recovery geothermal Hawaii NEPA permitting quarterly meeting White Papers On June 26th, we held the 3rd Quarter GRR Stakeholder Update at the Grand Sierra Resort in Reno, NV. The meeting was well-attended with over 40 attendees, including in-person and webinar attendance. Thanks to all who attended! Presentation During the meeting, we reviewed the current status of the GRR efforts, including: * Roadmap Development: expansion to Colorado and Texas - both sets of flowcharts are developed and available online!

76

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2000 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2000 Welcome to the 25th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Included in this issue: CEQ Fosters Communication Among Federal NEPA Liaisons DOE NEPA Order Revised, National Nuclear Security Administration Responsibilities Outlined Focus on CEQ NEPA Liaison Topics Get to Know Your EPA EIS Reviewers List Cooperating Agencies on EIS Cover Sheets Amphibian Declines Federal Agencies Adopt Unified Watershed Management Policy Revised Historic Preservation Regulations To Be Issued Accurate Electronic NEPA Files Mini-guidance: Reduce Abbreviations Mini-guidance Collection Available Use the Glossary of Terms NAEP Award Nominations Due NEPA Contracts: Measuring Performance Quality DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Update

77

http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/process/ll/95q2.htm  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2ND 2ND QUARTER FY 1995 Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy June 1, 1995 INTRODUCTION To foster continuing improvement of the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA, issued June 13, 1994, requires the Office of Environment, Safety and Health to solicit comments from the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Officer, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement and environmental assessment on lessons learned in the process, and to distribute a quarterly summary to all NEPA Compliance Officers and NEPA Document Managers. This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between January 1 and March 31, 1995. It is based primarily on responses to the revised questionnaire that was

78

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices.

79

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features NEPA success stories from field organizations: how the NEPA process helped resolve cultural resource protection issues at Fernald, and how innovative approaches are aiding preparation of a Site-wide EIS for Sandia, New Mexico.

80

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 Welcome to the 26th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles included in this issue: Innovative Field Research Benefits from NEPA Review Mini-guidance: $aving $ on EIS Distribution NEPA Office Needs Fewer Paper Copies of Issued Documents Analyzing All Reasonable Alternatives in an EIS NOAA Issues New Coastal Zone Regulations DOE Solicits Comments on Public Participation Policy More NNSA NEPA Procedures BLM Tool for Better Scoping Comments NEPA Staff Supported CEQ Technology Task Force Transitions When to Provide Cost Estimates in Annual NEPA Planning Summaries Some Considerations in Selecting NEPA Document Preparers DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Update

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 In this issue, we highlight DOE's NEPA performance metrics, including a historical perspective. As DOE NEPA practitioners strive to control time and cost while maintaining quality, this most recent NEPA metrics analysis shows that overall performance generally appears to have remained stable, notwithstanding a substantial workload. Articles in this issue include: 10 Years of NEPA Metrics: 2003-2012 DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Historical Perspective on EIS Completion Times Responding to Comments NEPA Search Tool NAEP Abstracts, Nominations Document Managers and CORs Eating the NEPA Elephant Web-based Scoping Meeting A Summer with NEPA Stakeholders Directory EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter

82

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title : NODA 1. Planned repair of flow lines Dat e : 8/41201 DOE Code : Contrac t o r Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Ov erview NODA 1. Planned repair of flow lines : CX 8 5.4 1. Bnef project description [include anything that could impact the Note : For all 85.4 : Repair of pipeline sections falls under USACE environmenl] Nationwide Permit Number 12, Utility Line Activity. Non-emergency repairs that do NOT include reportable releases I spills. NOD required to ensure activities remain within existing right-of-ways (25' from centerline] and to determine if further analysis may be needed. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lea d a nd review ed by the Environmental Specialist a nd the DOE NEPA

83

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1998 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1998 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1998 Welcome to the second quarter FY 1998 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: NCO Meeting in DC The Role of the NCO Special Considerations in Applying Categorical Exclusions NEPA Training Anticipated DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Integrating NEPA with Other Reviews Advice from GC NRC Adopts DOE NEPA Documents at NEEL Alternative Dispute Resolution Clean Air Act Conformity Requirements Ecological Society Briefing NAPA Evaluates DOE NEPA Program NEPA Guidance Updates Litigation Updates Second Quarter FY98 Questionnaire Results EIS-related Documents Recent EIS Milestones EA Completion Times and Costs Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) More Documents & Publications ADR Revised Policy

84

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1998 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1998 Welcome to the first quarter FY 1998 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: Managing Progress on the Repository EIS Richland EA: Public Involvement and Classified Information WIPP and WM RODs Issued DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Early NEPA Review Saves Resources Technical Assistance from Core Technical Group Recent NEPA Guidance EPA Proposes Changes to Voluntary EIS Policy Anticipating the Discovery of Unknown Waste DOE Planning Summaries Provide NEPA Forecasts Recent EIS Milestones NAEP Identifies Accepted NEPA Practices Environmental Restoration's NCO Describes His Role Richlands NEPA Process Game Enlivens Training Transitions

85

NEPA | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

NEPA NEPA Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home NEPA Casual Use Determination of NEPA Adequacy Categorical Exclusion Environmental Assessment Environmental Impact Statements Print PDF NEPA-Related Documents General Document Collections (178) Documents Regulatory Roadmap FONSI Graphic illustrating the components of the NEPA process. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) - Enacted in 1970, NEPA established a national policy to encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment and to promote the prevention and elimination of damage to the environment and biosphere. At the heart of NEPA is the requirement that federal agencies or departments must consider the environmental impacts of all major federal

86

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance & Requirements » Lessons Learned » Lessons Learned Guidance & Requirements » Lessons Learned » Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive December 2, 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2013 Welcome to the 77th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue reminds us that, through teamwork and dedication by DOE's NEPA community, we can produce high quality documents that enhance the Department's decisionmaking and help protect the environment. September 6, 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 Welcome to the 76th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features a look at DOE's NEPA performance metrics, including a historical perspective. As DOE NEPA practitioners strive to control time and cost while maintaining quality, this most recent NEPA

87

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1999 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1999 Welcome to the 20th Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue includes a cumulative index for the past five years. Articles in this issue include: Proposed Arizona-Mexico Transmission Project Presents Challenges to NEPA Process and Analysis CEQ Memo on Non-Federal Cooperating Agencies EPA Guidance on Cumulative Impacts DOE NEPA Web Demonstration Publishing a Draft EIS on NEPA Web NAEP Conference Forest Services Decision Protocol DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update DOE Litigation Update Other Agency NEPA Cases EAs and EISs Completed this Quarter Other EIS-related Documents Third Quarter FY 1999 Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts Training Opportunities

88

Guidance Regarding Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Process:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Process: Interim Actions Guidance Regarding Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Process: Interim Actions DOE guidance to provide assistance in determining whether an action within the scope of an EIS may be taken before a record of decision is issued. The guidance reviews applicable requirements, gives examples of the types of actions that may proceed as interim actions, describes case studies, and outlines the steps in the EIS process for interim actions. Guidance Regarding Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Process: Interim Actions More Documents & Publications NEPA and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 Mini-Guidance Articles from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports, Dec. 1994 to

89

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

n tal Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope oc:c:urs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and contact the Technical...

90

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Each Federal agency is required to develop NEPA procedures that supplement the CEQ Regulations. Developed in consultation with CEQ, Federal agency NEPA procedures must meet the standards in the CEQ...

91

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1997 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1997 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Will Be Ready to Use Soon! CEQ Initiative on NEPA Implementation DOE Submits Comments on CEQ Environmental Justice Guidance NEPA Order to Be Reissued with Conforming Changes DOE Sued on Stockpile Stewardship and Waste Management PEISs Effective NEPA Hearings Bob Strickler and Linda Thurston Retire Reminder about Stakeholder Notification Litigation Updates New Executive Order on Protecting Children from Environmental Risks Annual NEPA Planning Summaries What's New with Electronic NEPA Questionnaire Results Other Completed EIS-Related Documents

92

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 This issue features suggestions from experienced NEPA practitioners on ways to meet Secretary Chu's challenge to make better use of existing tools and integrate project management with NEPA compliance. Articles in this issue include: Secretary's Memorandum Key Principles OLC Training Suggestions from NETL Effective EIS Management Teams EPA Requires Electronic EIS Filing 2012 DOE NEPA Stakeholders Directory DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update GIS Tools for the NEPA Practitioner CEQ Cooperating Agency Report NEPA Office Summer Interns Transitions Appeals Court Upholds BELLA EA Using Social Media for NEPA NNSA Webcast SPD SEIS Hearing EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results

93

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2005 Welcome to the 45th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We thank all those who participated in the NEPA 35 conference. You made it successful. We hope you are as inspired as we are by the spirit of NEPA Section 101and the challenge to improve the implementation of NEPA. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: NEPA 35: Back to Basics, Back to the Future Congressional NEPA Task Force Holds Final Hearings NEPA 35 Conference Highlights CEQ Chairman Connaughton's Keynote Address Plenary Sessions NECRAC Final Report Environmental Justice and Indian Country Training Sesssions Breakout Sessions

94

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2004 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2004 Welcome to the 40th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. That's 40 issues! Have you read them all? We are pleased to feature the July 2004 NEPA Community Meeting in this issue, as well as our annual update of the cumulative index to LLQR. Thank you for your continuing support. Articles included in this issue: DOE's NEPA Process - Getting Better and Better NEPA Community Meeting Highlights Awards for Contributions to DOE's NEPA Program Working with Cooperating Agencies e-NEPA Improves Access and Efficiency Getting Better Through Guidance More Thoughts on Getting Better and Better NEPA Office Shares Best Practices Lessons Learned from Lessons Learned Part 4

95

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2005 Welcome to the 43rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue we take a look at our hard-working NEPA Compliance Officers, who share bits of wisdom (and a little humor) gained from their lessons learned implementing NEPA. Countless thanks to all NCOs for their dedication, flexibility, and perseverance. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles in this issue include: Who Has More Than 500 Years of NEPA Experience? A Closer Look at the DOE NEPA Compliance Officers CEQ Asks Federal Agencies to Lead NEPA Modernization Congressional NEPA Task Force Earth Day 2005 EPA Rates Action Alternatives in Moab EIS Update on Cape Wind Project

96

NEPA Stakeholders Directory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Policy Act N E P A DIRECTORY of POTENTIAL STAKEHOLDERS for DOE ACTIONS under NEPA 28 th Edition July 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: July 28, 201 1 REPLY TO ATN OF: Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (C. Chen, GC-54,202-586-0733) SUBJECT: Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA: 2gth Edition TO: DOE NEPA Community I am pleased to announce that the 2sth edition of the Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA, dated July 20 1 1, is now posted on the DOE NEPA website (http://ne-pa. enerm. gov/documents/StakeholdersDirectory. pdfl. The Directory is intended to supplement distribution lists that DOE Offices compile for particular projects or facilities

97

75th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued 5th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued 75th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued June 3, 2013 - 4:11pm Addthis The 75th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process was issued on June 3, 2013. This issue of Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) includes articles on recent guidance by the Council on Environmental Quality and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to promote better integration of NEPA and Section 106 reviews, and on the Federal Highway Administration's Every Day Counts intitiative to better integrate planning and NEPA. "Efforts such as these to improve NEPA implementation are indicative of what we strive for at DOE every day -- better NEPA review, better decisions," said Carol Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and

98

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 Welcome to the 58th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We have been very busy addressing our NEPA responsibilities arising from the recovery act as well as the new policies of the obama administration. In this issue of the Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR), we share ideas and experiences that will foster an improved and expedited NEPA compliance process. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Efficiency Essential to Recovery Plan NEPA Opportunities in a New Era of Openness Secretary Chu to DOE Employees: "Help Turn the Ship" Secretary Chu Pledges to Improve DOE Management New DOE-Wide NEPA Support Contracts! Sutley Brings Breadth of Government Experience to CEQ

99

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2000 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2000 Welcome to the 22nd Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS Helps DOE Preserve Unique Resources DOE Inspector General Report Questions Categorical Exclusion Application DOE Decides Disposition of Surplus Plutonium Interview with New NEPA Director at CEQ Transitions DOE Issues Decisions on Low-level and Mixed Low-level Waste Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's 25-Year History Considering Essential Fish Habitat in NEPA Reviews NEPA Guidance Updates Web Site of Interest DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Training Opportunities DOE Litigation Updates Other NEPA Cases EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter

100

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 4, 2007 September 4, 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2007 Welcome to the 52nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue highlights the start of two major DOE EISs and features several guest-written articles. June 1, 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2007 Welcome to the 51st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features collaboration as a key element of a successful NEPA process. Related articles discuss approaches to and benefits of collaboration and illustrate various applications. March 1, 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 Welcome to the 50th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance launched the Lessons Learned program in December 1994 to support continuous improvement in the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1996 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1996 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: "NEPA Compliance Officers Meeting: Continuous Improvement" DOE Comments on CEQ Cumulative Impacts Handbook DOE-wide NEPA Procurement Environmental Justice Guidance Update Senate Subcommittee Focuses on NEPA DOE NEPA Rule Amendments for Power Marketing Activities Litigation Updates: Rulings on Alternatives Environmental Assessment Quality Study Fourth quarter FY1996 Lessons Learned Questionnaire results, including EIS and EA cost and time reports Analysis of EA and EIS cost and time outliers EA and EIS cost and time trend analysis Lessons Learned Quarterly Report

102

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2008 Welcome to the 57th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the September DOE NEPA Community Meeting as well as recent case studies. Articles in this issue include: NEPA Helps Us Make Good Decisions, Accomplish Missions, Secretary Bodman Says 2008 NEPA Meeting - Plenary Session General Counsel Emphasizes Value of NEPA Leadership Recognized Keys to Yucca NEPA Success Sabotage and Terrorism; Global Climate Change NEPAssist Demonstration DOJ Advice: "Show Your Work" NNSA NCO Offers Lessons CEQ Hot Topics 2008 NEPA Meeting - NCO Session The Essential Role of the NCO Advice from Counsel Applicants and the DOE NEPA Process DOE NEPA Metrics Update A Closer Look at the DOE NCOs - Round 2

103

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2010 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2010 Welcome to the 64th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we feature reflections on the 40th Anniversary of NEPA from the DOE NEPA Community. We also continue to report on activities to enhance transparency in the NEPA process, including a new DOE policy and recent recommendations from CEQ. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE Uses e-NEPA To Enhance Public Participation Lessons from Oil Spill Review Apply Broadly Reflections on NEPA at 40 CX Determination: NEPA Review or Exemption? 2010 Stakeholders Directory Issued DOE NEPA Order Updated Recovery Act NEPA Reviews Keep Pace

104

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2010 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2010 Welcome to the 63rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we continue our observance of the 40th anniversary of NEPA. This is a time to address the need to reinvigorate NEPA implementation for the next 40 years. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: NAEP Conference Looks to NEPA's Future Celebrating 40 Years with NEPA and Earth Day DOE NEPA Website Pursues Continuous Improvement Experience in Posting CX Determinations NEPA Then and Now: Anne Norton Miller DOE Celebrates Earth Day 40 NAEP NEPA Excellence Award BPA Honors NEPA Accomplishments Jointly Issued FR Notices

105

Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructu...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2012 Section 1222 of the Energy Policy Act 2005 International Electricity Regulation Presidential Permits Export Authorizations Pending Applications NEPA Other Regulatory...

106

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994) Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994) The purpose of this guidance memorandum is to describe potential benefits of conducting a site-wide NEPA review (environmental impact statement orenvironmental assessment). Site-wide reviews can aid the Department of Energy (DOE) in meeting its goals to streamline the NEPA process, to make that process more useful to decision makers and thepublic, and to reduce the time and cost required to prepare NEPA documents. Benefits of Site-wide National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review More Documents & Publications Mini-Guidance Articles from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports, Dec. 1994 to Sept. 2005 "Frequently Asked Questions" on the Department of Energy's NEPA Regulations

107

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994) Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994) The purpose of this guidance memorandum is to describe potential benefits of conducting a site-wide NEPA review (environmental impact statement orenvironmental assessment). Site-wide reviews can aid the Department of Energy (DOE) in meeting its goals to streamline the NEPA process, to make that process more useful to decision makers and thepublic, and to reduce the time and cost required to prepare NEPA documents. Benefits of Site-wide National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review More Documents & Publications Mini-Guidance Articles from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports, Dec. 1994 to Sept. 2005 "Frequently Asked Questions" on the Department of Energy's NEPA Regulations

108

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project_!.!!formatlon Doll!r Reseed~ ~u.pment and Ol.mp lludts The table below Ia to be completed by the Project Lead and ,.vi-ed by the Envwonmental Spec1ull.r ao\d the DOll NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE, If Ch *r :,r· ol .ir.Uf · OC" '" , PtOjpermit? 0 Impacts Anllc lpatadt No I NA I 0 0 jo o (8] 0 j r!l o I ~ 0 Impacts Antle ted? Yea No NA

109

Documents: NEPA Support  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Search Documents: Search PDF Documents View a list of all documents NEPA Support PDF Icon Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Management Program: Data Compilation for the Paducah Site...

110

Federal NEPA Contacts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

CEQ and most Federal agencies identify primary points of contact for NEPA compliance. Normally a senior environmental professional, environmental law attorney, or member of agency leadership, these...

111

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1999 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1999 Welcome to the 21st Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: Good Information, Good Government; CEQ 1997 Report to Congress on Environmental Quality" Managing a National Public Participation Program for the Yucca Mountain EIS New Executive Order on Trade Agreements NEPA Challenges for Western Area Power Administration Is CD-ROM a Useful Complement to Paper Documents? Pollution Prevention and NEPA Clean Air Act Conformity and NEPA National Natural Landmark Considerations Include Distribution List in EIS Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2002 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2002

112

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 Welcome to the 62nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we start a year-long observance of the 40th anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act. The occasion calls for celebration of NEPA's successes as well as reflection on opportunities for improvement. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: CEQ Celebrates NEPA at 40. . . and So Do We! DOE Launches Categorical Exclusion Database Celebrating 40 Years with NEPA CEQ Issues Draft NEPA Guidance CEQ NEPA Symposium Presidential Proclamation Reflections: Professor Mandelker

113

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2002 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2002 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2002 Welcome to the 33rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Have you noticed that NEPA has been in the news a lot lately? Although this issue of LLQR is longer than usual, I encourage you to read all the news, views, and lessons learned. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: CEQ Asks How to Improve NEPA Implementation; Responses Vary Widely DOE Cooperating Agency Report DOE Proposes Floodplain/Wetland Rule Revisions Adaptive Management and the NEPA Process Impact Mitigation at Los Alamos Institute Establishes NEPA Advisory Committee Office of Science Promotes Early NEPA Planning

114

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1996 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1996 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1996 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report of Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This Quarterly Report includes: March 1996 NEPA Contracting Workshop: Do it Right the First Time EIS Coordination between Headquarters and Field Bounding Analysis in DOE NEPA Documents Questions and Answers on EIS References Suggestions from a NEPA Document Manager (Hanford K-Basins Spent Fuel EIS) Toll-Free Phone for Public Involvement Video Conferencing for Public Hearings Alternative Dispute Resolution and the NEPA Process Litigation Updates Comments on Proposed Amendments to DOE NEPA Regulations Second quarter FY 1996 Lessons Learned Questionnaire results,including EIS and EA cost and time reports Analysis of recent trends in costs and time

115

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 Welcome to the 58th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We have been very busy addressing our NEPA responsibilities arising from the recovery act as well as the new policies of the obama administration. In this issue of the Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR), we share ideas and experiences that will foster an improved and expedited NEPA compliance process. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Efficiency Essential to Recovery Plan NEPA Opportunities in a New Era of Openness Secretary Chu to DOE Employees: "Help Turn the Ship" Secretary Chu Pledges to Improve DOE Management New DOE-Wide NEPA Support Contracts! Sutley Brings Breadth of Government Experience to CEQ DOE Advances NEPA Process for Loan Guarantees

116

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2002 Welcome to the 32nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Much of this issue is devoted to reporting on the July DOE NEPA Community Meeting. Also featured is new NEPA-related guidance. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Community Meeting Addresses Reform Initiatives New Guidance Issued, More Underway Accident Analysis Guidance Agencies Discuss Indian Sacred Sites e-NEPA: Security Certification Needed Draft Information Quality Guidelines Litigation Updates DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Training Opportunities EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter NEPA Document Cost and Time Facts Recent EIS-Related Milestones What Worked and Didn't Work

117

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1997 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1997 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1997 Welcome to the fourth quarter FY 1997 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: NEPA Review Adds Value to Proposed Sale of Naval Petroleum Reserve INEEL EIS: New Approaches to Scoping CEQ Environmental Justice Guidance Strategies for EIS Savings ISO 14000 and NEPA Recent EIS Milestones NAEP NEPA Recommendations New National Environmental Training Office Beneficial Landscaping Practices Draft CEQ Guidance on Global Climate Change Transitions DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Transboundary Environmental Impacts Annual NEPA Planning Summaries Recent NEPA Guidance Public Involvement: If You Don't Know Where You're Going Litigation Updates Questionnaire Results EIS-related Documents

118

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1999 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1999 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1999 Welcome to the second quarter FY 1999 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In addition to the articles beginning on page 1, this issue includes: Consolidated Decision Ends Tritium Trilogy Tale NEPA and Habitat Management Plan: Environmental Synergy Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Revises Section 106 Regulations Mini-guidance Plain Language for NEPA Federal Register Notices Distributing a Record of Decision A Helpful Hint for EIS Glossaries New Books for the NEPA Practitioners Bookshelf DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Court Allows WIPP to Open Transitions at the CEQ EH Electronic Publishing Standards and Guidelines Training Opportunities Documents Issued, Second Quarter FY 1999 Second Quarter FY 1999 Questionnaire Results

119

55th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

08 1 08 1 Second Quarter FY 2008 June 2, 2008; Issue No. 55 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A September Meeting: Making NEPA Work for DOE Old NEPA Tools Still Work in a "Changing Climate" With the support of David Hill, DOE General Counsel, planning for the next DOE NEPA Community meeting is underway!

120

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 2006 June 2006 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2006 Welcome to the 47th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. The quality of our NEPA process affects the quality of DOE's decisions. Our appreciation goes out to all the NCOs and NEPA Document Managers who work every day to build quality into NEPA documents. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue include: Quality + Leadership = NEPA Success Security Reviews Needed for EISs on DOE NEPA Website NAEP Presents Award for NEPA 35 Conference FedCenter Website CRS Report on NEPA Streamlining Global Nuclear Energy Partnership EIS Sites Proposed for FutureGen Project Hanford EIS Scoping 2006 NAEP Conference Renewed Emphasis on EMS DOE Headquarters, Field Sites Celebrate Earth Day

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 Welcome to the 62nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we start a year-long observance of the 40th anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act. The occasion calls for celebration of NEPA's successes as well as reflection on opportunities for improvement. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: CEQ Celebrates NEPA at 40. . . and So Do We! DOE Launches Categorical Exclusion Database Celebrating 40 Years with NEPA CEQ Issues Draft NEPA Guidance CEQ NEPA Symposium Presidential Proclamation Reflections: Professor Mandelker NEPA Process Benefits DOE CEQ Cites DOE Examples on Climate Change, NEPA

122

Property:NEPA Application | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Application Application Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA Application Property Type Page Description NEPA application files. All NOIs. Drilling permits are also appropriate. This is a property of type Page. Pages using the property "NEPA Application" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) D DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2009-0030-CX + 87401 - NOI.pdf +, 87402 - NOI.pdf +, 87400 - NOI.pdf +, ... DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2009-0051-CX + 88819 - NOI - 2009-09.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2010-0008-CX + 88211 - NOI.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-CO1000-2010-0009-CX + NVN-088209-NOI.pdf +, NVN-088209 - NOI(a).pdf +, NVN-088212-NOI.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-CO1000-2010-0010-CX + 88210 - NOI.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-CO1000-2010-0011-CX + NVN-088209-NOI.pdf +, NVN-088209 - NOI(a).pdf +

123

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

cumulative emissions of CO 2 expected to result from commercialization of various clean coal technologies. This programmatic EIS also contained substantial discussions of...

124

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2013 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2013 March 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2013 In this issue, we highlight the many benefits of NEPA to DOE, including improved planning, and better public involvement and environmental protection. Articles in this issue include: Sharing DOE's NEPA Success Stories Integrating NEPA and Project Planning Works Minimize EIS Printing Costs DOE Cooperating Agency Report Electronic Guidance Compendium Tribal Energy Resource CEQ IT Working Group Conferences DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Transitions EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts LLQR-2013-Q1.pdf More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September

125

GUIDANCE REGARDING NEPA REGULATIONS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

This memorandum was published in the Federal Register and appears at 48 Fed. Reg. 34263 (1983). Ed. Note] This memorandum was published in the Federal Register and appears at 48 Fed. Reg. 34263 (1983). Ed. Note] GUIDANCE REGARDING NEPA REGULATIONS 40 CFR Part 1500 Executive Office of the President Council on Environmental Quality 722 Jackson Place, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 July 22, 1983 Memorandum For: Heads of Federal Agencies From: A. Alan Hill, Chairman Re: Guidance Regarding NEPA Regulations The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) were issued on November 29, 1978. These regulations became effective for, and binding upon, most federal agencies on July 30, 1979, and for all remaining federal agencies on November 30, 1979. As part of the Council's NEPA oversight responsibilities it solicited through an August 14,

126

NEPA Lessons Learned Questionnaire  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Learned Questionnaire Learned Questionnaire Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance U.S. Department of Energy Preface Your timely completion of this questionnaire will aid the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance in meeting its responsibility to foster continuing improvement of the Department of Energy's National Environmental Policy Act process. In accordance with DOE Order 451.1B, National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program, NEPA Document Managers and NEPA Compliance Officers should fill out a questionnaire (separately or jointly) as soon as possible after completing each environmental impact statement (EIS) and environmental assessment (EA). Other document preparation team members are encouraged to also submit a questionnaire. The questionnaire is designed to structure your responses, but you should feel free to attach a statement describing

127

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA Review Routing Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Review Routing Form NEPA Review Routing Form A ::opy of I \ I I ..... Forwarded Forwarded To Date i-t l.tlbrub ~ r:H:.. ~rrr

128

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1996 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1996 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1996 Welcome to the newly-revised Quarterly Report of Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. In response to reader suggestions, we have expanded the scope of the report to provide a wider variety of NEPArelated information, and enhanced the format for better clarity and overall readability. This Quarterly Report includes: A NEPA SUCCESS STORY: Environmental Impact Statement for the Safe Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes NEPA lessons learned at the Hanford Site Mini-guidance on the preparation of EIS summaries, properly eliminating alternatives and impacts from detailed analysis, application of DOE NEPA regulations to procurement, and NEPA questions and answers Updates on the proposed amendments to DOE's NEPA regulations,

129

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1998 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 1998 December 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1998 Welcome to the fourth quarter FY 1998 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: New and Improved NEPA Compliance Guide Issued in 2 Volumes NEPA Community Meeting in Las Vegas Managing Baseline Environmental Information for the Sandia Site-wide EIS Water Project Mini-guidance Regulatory Compliance and NEPA Procedures for an Environmental Critique and Synopsis, and a Supplement Analysis EPA Broadens Voluntary EIS Policy Historic Preservation Proposed Regulatory Revision Withdrawn Acting Chair at CEQ Training Opportunities Environmental Lessons Learned Seminars Litigation Updates DOE NEPA Community Members in Transition Annual NEPA Planning Summaries Performance-based Statements of Work

130

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2002 2002 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2002 Welcome to the 31st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles in this issue include: Beverly Cook Balances NEPA Objectives: Both Flexibility and Consistency Are Needed DOE NEPA Community Meeting in July Expanding Online Access to DOE NEPA Documents Change in e-file Submittal Address Perspectives from a Town Official EH Priority: Guidance to Improve NEPA Implementation EPA Distributes Reminders on Filing an EIS Interior Department Welcomes Electronic EISs New on the NEPA Bookshelf Transitions Whats New from CEQ Training Opportunities Litigation Updates Proposals Due for New DOE-wide Contracts EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter

131

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 Welcome to the 59th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the DOE NCO meeting and the NAEP annual conference, where streamlining the NEPA process for Recovery Act projects and consideration of climate change in NEPA documents were both addressed. We've begun to follow up on suggestions from the NCO meeting (below). Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE NEPA Compliance Officers Share Strategies 2009 NCO Meeting: Expediting a Quality NEPA Process Expedite Schedule and Maintain Quality Preparing Focused, Concise EAs

132

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1995 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 1995 September 1995 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1995 This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between April 1 and June 30, 1995. It is based primarily on responses to the revised questionnaire that was provided for use during January 1995, and includes information on direct and indirect NEPA process costs and on total project costs. The report includes a Question and Answer section as well as guidance on selected topics. REPORT CONTENTS: NEPA Document Preparation Times NEPA Cost Data NEPA Document Content The Document Preparation Process Effectiveness of the NEPA Process Other Lessons Learned Lessons Learned Questions and Answers EISs Completed 3rd Quarter FY 1995 EAs Completed 3rd Quarter FY 1995

133

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2003 Welcome to the 35th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to include in this issue three new mini-guidance articles. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: Responding to Comments Is Work, But It Makes the NEPA Process Work DOE NEPA Meeting in July Mini-guidance: Multiple RODs Offer Flexibility Effective and Efficient EIS Distribution Keep the Public Informed When EIS Plans Change DOE Updates Public Participation Policy Observations on Annual NEPA Planning Summaries DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Guidance Issued Not Meeting CAA Requirements Can Cause Delays Floodplain and Wetland Regulations Update

134

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2001 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2001 Welcome to the 28th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This completes our seventh year of providing performance metrics, news, and guidance to the DOE NEPA Community. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Compliance Officers Consider Further Improvements NCO Meeting Federal/State/Tribal Coordination Forest Fire; Forest Preserved View From EPA Streamlining Approvals of Energy Projects NEPA Pilot Projects to Demonstrate Mediation DOE-wide NEPA Contracting Executive Order on Migratory Birds FERC Outreach for Natural Gas Approvals Life-Cycle Assessment for "Green" Projects

135

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2000 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2000 September 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2000 Welcome to the 24th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Note that this issue includes a cumulative index covering the past six years of reports. Articles included in this issue: Emergency NEPA Procedures Invoked for Actions Taken after Los Alamos Fire DOE Programs Win NAEP Awards U.S. Forest Service Receives Massive Response Interim DOE Technical Standard on Biota Doses Draft Guidelines for Environmental Review of Trade e-NEPA: Progress Made in Adding NEPA Documents Mini-Guidance: Affected Environment and No Action Alternative Label an EA for Pre-Approval Review Using Significant Digits NEPA Guidance Updates New on the NEPA Bookshelf Transitions DOE-Wide NEPA Contract Updates

136

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2011 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2011 Welcome to the 68th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features an analysis of recent NEPA performance metrics. While we are pleased that EA cost and time metrics have improved, we are continuing to analyze how to apply lessons learned from the Recovery Act experiences more broadly. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles in this issue include: DOE NEPA Metrics Show Positive Results New DOE NEPA Website Design Federal Agencies Completing Recovery Act NEPA Work Environmental Reports To Streamline NEPA Analyses Uranium Leasing Program PEIS Scoping Meetings More Stakeholders Accept NEPA Documents Online

137

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2008 Welcome to the 56th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature EPA 's web-based tool for NEPA practitioners, as well as the new DOE NEPA Website. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: NEPAssist: EPA's New Tool for NEPA Practitioners Loan Guarantee Office Plans NEPA Reviews New DOE NEPA Website Launched Two USDA Agencies Revise NEPA Procedures NEST Environmental Indicators Program Santa Susana Area IV EIS: Making Your Voice Heard DOE Conducts Public Scoping for Transmission Line EA EPA Comments on Yucca Mountain Final EISs 2008 Stakeholders Directory Issued

138

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 This issue features suggestions from experienced NEPA practitioners on ways to meet Secretary Chu's challenge to make better use of existing tools and integrate project management with NEPA compliance. Articles in this issue include: Secretary's Memorandum Key Principles OLC Training Suggestions from NETL Effective EIS Management Teams EPA Requires Electronic EIS Filing 2012 DOE NEPA Stakeholders Directory DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update GIS Tools for the NEPA Practitioner CEQ Cooperating Agency Report NEPA Office Summer Interns Transitions Appeals Court Upholds BELLA EA Using Social Media for NEPA NNSA Webcast SPD SEIS Hearing EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts LLQR-2012-Q3.pdf

139

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2010 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2010 Welcome to the 65th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we conclude our celebration of the 40th Anniversary of NEPA and look forward in the year ahead to implementing new tools from the Council on Environmental Quality and finalizing our NEPA rulemaking. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: Celebrating NEPA's Origins and Enduring Value CEQ Issues Categorical Exclusion Guidance NEPA 40th Anniversary Symposium NEPA Reviews Support Recovery Act Goals Recovery Act Makes 2010 a Busy Year for NEPA Best Practices Manual on Public Outreach Hanford Tank EIS Workshop

140

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter FY 1996  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Gary Palmer at (202) 586-1785. John J. Pulliam, III, will retire in September after 30 years of service with the Federal Government. A biologist by training, John served his...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Issue No. 40, Third Quarter...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

be interpreted within this context of meeting DOE's mission needs, he said. The ten-year trends for costs and completion times for EAs and EISs reflect positively on DOE's...

142

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter FY 1997  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

believe that having preliminary data right from the start will shorten Halliburton NUS's learning curve and will expedite preparation of the SWEIS. For more information, contact...

143

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

144

ederal NEPA Contacts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

STATE NEPA CONTACTS: STATE NEPA CONTACTS: State and Agency: NEPA Regulation: Name: Address: Phone/Email/Website: California Office of Planning and Research/ State Clearinghouse CAL. PUB. RES. CODE §§ 21000 - 21177 Mr. Scott Morgan Director of State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Room 212 Sacramento, CA 95814 916-445-0613 state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov http://opr.ca.gov/index.php?a=c eqa/index.html Connecticut Office of Policy and Management CONN. GEN. STATE. ANN. §§ 22a-1 to -1i Mr. Dimple Desai Director of CEPA 450 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106- 1308 860-418-6412 860-418-6200 (fax) Dimple.desai@ct.gov http://www.ct.gov/opm District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs D.C. STAT. §§ 8-109.01 to -109.11 Mr. Ibrahim Bullo

145

77th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

77th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued 77th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued 77th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued December 3, 2013 - 3:18pm Addthis The 77th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process was issued on December 2, 2013. This issue of Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) examines positive outcomes of the NEPA process. Featured articles include a review by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance of nearly 400 excerpts from questionnaire responses published in LLQR during the past 10 years regarding the usefulness and effectiveness of the NEPA process. An overwhelming majority of the questionnaire responses describe positive outcomes and illustrate that we can produce high quality documents that enhance the Department's decisionmaking and help protect the environment.

146

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2011 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2011 Welcome to the 67th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue showcases BPA's mitigation and monitoring activities and best practices of DOE Program and Field Offices for efficiently preparing NEPA documents, involving the public, and making a difference in the quality of environmental protection. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: Bonneville's "Balanced Scorecard" Approach to Mitigation, Monitoring, and Adaptive Management Make Reference Documents Available Online Promoting NEPA Transparency and Public Engagement "Sunshine Week" Symposium DOE Evaluating NEPA Compliance in Audits

147

NEPA Compliance Officer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Officer Compliance Officer Award #: EE 000 0784 Recipient: County of Escambia ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) MC Blanchard Judicial Center B5.1 Historic Preservation Clause and Old Courthouse Block Waste Stream Clause Office Complex EEIP Road Prison Geothermal Earth Coupled HVAC Upgrade A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering, data collection, reporting, and preliminary design. Prohibited Activities: Implementation of final design, construction, and operation tasks for this project should be conditioned pending further NEPA review. Landfill Gas Extraction and Control System A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering,

148

NEPA History | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

History History NEPA History Selected documents providing historical information on NEPA. June 14, 2012 Federal Register Notices for DOE NEPA Guidelines and Regulations Historical compilation of Federal Register notices for DOE NEPA guidelines and regulations. December 31, 2009 Presidential Proclamation on the 40th Anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act Proclamation of President Obama to "call upon all executive branch agencies to promote public involvement and transparency in their implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act." July 1, 1999 EPA's Section 309 Review: The Clean Air Act and NEPA This document discusses Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, which authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency to review certain proposed actions of

149

OpenEI Community - NEPA  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal NEPA Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC http://en.openei.org/community/blog/geothermal-nepa-workshop-grc On Tuesday, October 2, the Geothermal Technology Office and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory held a 1/2-day NEPA workshop.  The workshop was held at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, in conjunction with the GEA/GRC Tradeshow and Conference.  Three presentations were given, describing the NEPA database and associated analysis that had been conducted in 2013.

Files: 

150

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1997 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1997 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: CEQ Effectiveness Study CEQ Handbook on Cumulative Effects DOE Sites Enhancing Public Participation in EAs Stockpile Stewardship and Management ROD Issued EIS Distribution: Coordination with Congressional, Public and Intergovernmental Affairs EPA EIS Rating System Results of EA Quality Review DOE NEPA Web as Research Tool Litigation Updates DOE NEPA Process Data Misused GC to Provide Administrative Record Guidance Questions and Answers on Supplement Analyses First Quarter FY 1997 Lessons Learned Questionnaire Results, including EIS and EA Cost and Time reports Lessons Learned Quarterly Report

151

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 10  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Hanford Site environment and is numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is presented in Hanford Site NEPA related documents. The document is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many NEPA documents that are being prepared by contractors. The two chapters in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered this way to correspond to the chapters where such information is presented in environmental impact statements (EISs) and other Site-related NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes the Hanford Site environment, and includes information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological and historical resources, socioeconomics, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes applicable federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site.

Neitzel, D.A. [ed.] [ed.; Fosmire, C.J.; Fowler, R.A. [and others] [and others

1998-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

NEPA | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

NEPA NEPA Home Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 14 October, 2013 - 20:19 Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Categorical Exclusions CX Database EA EIS FONSI GEA GRC GRR NEPA On Tuesday, October 2, the Geothermal Technology Office and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory held a 1/2-day NEPA workshop. The workshop was held at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, in conjunction with the GEA/GRC Tradeshow and Conference. Three presentations were given, describing the NEPA database and associated analysis that had been conducted in 2013. Files: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation icon 2. NEPA History - Presentation application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation icon 3. Categorical Exclusions - Presentation

153

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE (EH-42)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision: January 24, 2012 Revision: January 24, 2012 OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE (GC-54) Forrestal Building, Room 3E-080 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Phone: 202-586-4600 Fax: 202-586-7031 Website: http://energy.gov/nepa/ Phone (202-58X-) Usual Assignments Email: firstname.lastname@hq.doe.gov Carol Borgstrom 6-4600 Director Lettie Wormley 6-4610 Secretary Eastern Energy and Waste Management Unit Brian Costner 6-9924 Unit Leader (Recovery Act Lead, Surplus Plutonium Disposition SEIS) Connie Chen 6-0733 OE, NEPA Stakeholders Directory, 10 CFR Part 1022 Yardena Mansoor 6-9326 EM (Oak Ridge, Savannah River Site), FE (Strategic Petroleum Reserve), OE, Western Area Power Administration, Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Property

154

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Issue No. 32; Third Quarter FY 2002 (September 3, 2002)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

September 2002 September 2002 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Third Quarter FY 2002 September 3, 2002; Issue No. 32 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS continued on page 3 NEPA Community Meeting Addresses Reform Initiatives James Connaughton, CEQ Chair, urged linking NEPA with EMS. Challenged to “Reform and Re-energize NEPA Implementation,” more than 150 members of the DOE NEPA Community convened in Washington, DC, on July 16 and 17, 2002, at the annual meeting sponsored by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance. Highlights of the meeting included presentations by James Connaughton, Chair, Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), and the senior environmental advisor to the President; and Robert Card, Under Secretary for Energy,

155

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Fourth Quarter FY 2002; December 2, 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2002 December 2, 2002; Issue No. 33 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS CEQ Asks How to Improve NEPA Implementation; Responses Vary Widely continued on page 5 In response to questions from the Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ's) NEPA Task Force, Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies, environmental and business groups, and individual citizens have weighed in during the past few months with opinions on how to improve NEPA implementation. CEQ also sought and received examples of best practices and case studies. Collectively, the comments cover nearly every aspect of NEPA implementation. They range from strong support for the value of the NEPA process to sharp criticism,

156

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; March 3, 2003; Issue No. 34; First Quarter FY 2003  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Lear Lessons Lear ned March 2003 1 wealth of information that informs the NEPA process, he explained. Mr. Greczmiel told the workshop audience that the CEQ NEPA Task Force, which he directs, has looked at ways EMS could improve NEPA implementation. An EMS can improve relations with local communities, especially with regulators, who appreciate the Federal effort to address environmental issues systematically, he said. Another benefit of an EMS, he noted, is that it can provide methods for following up NEPA's predictive analysis. National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT First Quarter FY 2003 March 3, 2003; Issue No. 34 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS New DOE Order Focuses on EMS, Supports Basic NEPA Principles Few Comments Received on Proposed

157

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2004 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2004 The National Environmental Policy Act turns 35 on January 1, 2005! This landmark legislation altered the Federal decisionmaking process. In this issue of LLQR, Ray Berube, retired Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment, looks back at how NEPA compliance procedures have evolved at DOE. Our lead article looks at how the Internet is becoming an increasingly useful NEPA tool. We hope you will find helpful suggestions throughout LLQR on how we can continue to improve and modernize NEPA implementation, and, as always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: Putting the Web to Work for NEPA Case Studies Address NEPA Section 101

158

RM Environmental Review (NEPA)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Review-NEPA Environmental Review-NEPA Categorical exclusions are posted here to promote transparency and openness. Some actions may have environmental impacts that require an environmental assessment and a detailed analysis to determine the extent and severity of the impacts. For actions that have significant impacts or consequences to the environment or human health, RM prepares environmental impact statements. Environmental Impact Statements-EIS Estes-Flatiron Transmission Line Rebuild Project Granby Pumping Plant-Windy Gap Transmission Line Rebuild Project Hermosa West Wind Energy Project Maintenance and Vegetation Management along Existing Western TransmissionLine Rights of Way on National Forest System Lands in Colorado, Utah, Nebraska Platte River Cooperative Agreement PEIS, NE, CO and WY, DOE/EIS-0295 (Cooperating Agency)

159

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 Project lnfonnation Project Title: CBM Gas Separator Date: 2-23-2010 DOE Code: 6720-020-51131 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview None anticipated, uses producing well on pre-existing location. 1. What are the environmental impacts? 48-2-X-28 Location, 447' FSL. 2495 FWL, SE, SW, Sec. 28, T39N, R78W, Natrona County. Wyoming USA 2. Wnat is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Forkfift. winch truck. water truck etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Special ist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NO'TE: H Change of Scope occurs, Proj ect Lead m u st $ubmlt a new NEPA Compllance Suntey and

160

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EAG. Maintenance I grading of existing roads Date: 8/4/2011 and road drainages (barrow ditches): ex 81.3 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview 1. Brief project description [include C-EA 6. Maintenance I grading of existing roads and road drai nages anything that could impact the (barrow ditches) : ex 81.3 environment] Existing roads defined as per May 2010 Aerial Photos. (Changing out culverts, grading I modifying embankments, etc., that has potential to impact wetlands, requires a NCS.) The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Change out down guy on power pole Date: 2-8-10 DOE Code : Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview 1 What are the environmental No impact to the environment impacts? Power pole east of B-1 -33 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 3Hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (worl< over rig, drilling rig, Backhoe and operator for equ1 pment etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE; If ChiingNEPA Compllai"'Ce Survey alld contact Ut TlrCh.,lcal Assunlnce DepartmenL Impacts If YES, then complete below

162

UGP Environmental Review (NEPA)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Review-NEPA Environmental Review-NEPA Categorical exclusions are posted here to promote transparency and openness. Some actions may have environmental impacts that require an environmental assessment and a detailed analysis to determine the extent and severity of the impacts. For actions that have significant impacts or consequences to the environment or human health, UGP prepares environmental impact statements. Environmental Impact Statement-EIS Groton Generation Projects Draft EIS, Deer Creek Station Energy Facility Project, Brookings County, South Dakota (12.7mb pdf) Deer Creek Station Energy Facility Project Record of Decision (900kb pdf) Grande Praire Wind Farm, O'Neill, NE Wilton IV Wind Energy Center EIS (DOE/EIS-0469) Upper Great Plains Wind Energy Programmatic EIS (DOE/EIS-0408)

163

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: New Drilling Location in Section 29 Date: 12-10-2009 DOE Code: 6730.020.78002 Contractor Code: 8067-371 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview The project will involve excavating 3-4 backhoe pits to a depth of about 8 feet to observe soil characteristics 1. What are the environmental impacts? in the vicinity of our planned reserve pit excavation area. 2. What is the legal location? NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 29. T39N. R78W. Natrona County, Wyoming 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

164

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Project l nfonnation Project Title: Reclamation ofT-2-14 Date: 11/2412009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be removing old piping from the treater@ T-2-14. We will also remove the berm and grade and 1. What are the environmental impacts? reclamate location. The duration of this project will be approx. 2 days. Equipment that will be used is as follows backhoe. dumptruck, blade,and a tiller so we can seed with native grasses. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (woO< over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below Is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

165

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace electrical line from well to power pole Date: 3/10/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview No impact to the environment. 1. What are the environmental impacts? Dig up old electrical line from pumping unit on 61-S-34 to power pole east of well , {approximately 75 feet 2. What is the legal location? from unit) and replace with new line. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig , drilling rig , etc.)? Electrician, ditch witch and operator for equipment The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

166

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration of 77 -13-SX-3 Date: 2-8-1 0 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring 77-SX-3 per procedure. 1. What are the environmental impacts? The duration of this project will be 3-4 days. 2. What is the leg al location? 3. What is the duration of the project? The equipment to be used will be Backhoe, welder, tiller dump truck. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig , We will take oil contaminated dirt to the Eastside landfarm and backfill with d ean fill dirt from sec. 20. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

167

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project lnfonnation Project Title: e-EA5. Reclamation of well sites Date: 8/4/2011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview e-EA 5. Reclamation of wellsites : ex 81.3 and ex 86.1 1. Brief project description [include anything that could impact the Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation and environment] consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of underground piping, removal of rig anchors or T-bars, drainage control , transport and backfilling of clean soil I fill dirt, and reseeding . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

168

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

~ ~ -o ~ ~ -o Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace Down Guy Rod 24~3 Date: 11/30/09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview Replace Down Guy Rod Emergency The pole was ready to Break Wire 5' above the ground 1. What are the environmental impacts? 24-SHX-3 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5 hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc,)? Back hole The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTe If Change of Scope oe~. Project Lead must sutlmft a new NEPA ColT pll~ Sunley and c ontact the T echnical Assurance Department. Impacts If YES, then complete below

169

Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners Collaboration in NEPA - a Handbook for NEPA Practitioners is a collaboration of research and consultations by CEQ concerning analyses prepared under NEPA. Updated in the Fall of 2007, this 100-page guide introduces interested parties to collaborative principles, and includes suggestions for successful collaborative efforts. CEQ Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners More Documents & Publications OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution

170

56th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8-14-08 - 2:30 pm - DRAFT -September 2008 8-14-08 - 2:30 pm - DRAFT -September 2008 1 NEPA Lessons Learned 1 Third Quarter FY 2008 September 2, 2008; Issue No. 56 U.S. DeparTmeNT oF eNergY QUarTerlY reporT National environmental policy act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A 2008 Meeting of the DOE NEPA Community - Washington, DC Sep 24 - a.m. NEPA Compliance Officers Sep 24 - p.m. NEPA Training Sep 25 DOE NEPA Community Making NEPA Work for DOE - more on page 2 Imagine a web-based tool that could "cut" through various sets of environmental data and layer the results meaningfully on a geographic basis. For a given location, this tool could consolidate information on features specified by the user - for example, proximity to

171

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 Welcome to the 59th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the DOE NCO meeting and the NAEP annual conference, where streamlining the NEPA process for Recovery Act projects and consideration of climate change in NEPA documents were both addressed. We've begun to follow up on suggestions from the NCO meeting (below). Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE NEPA Compliance Officers Share Strategies 2009 NCO Meeting: Expediting a Quality NEPA Process Expedite Schedule and Maintain Quality Preparing Focused, Concise EAs Stakeholder Views on DOE's NEPA Process

172

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2005 Welcome to the 44th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue completes our 11th year publishing LLQR, and as we go to press, we're preparing to mark an even more impressive milestone - our observance of the 35th anniversary of NEPA. We're busily working on all the details that will make this a great conference. We hope to see YOU there. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: Secretary Bodman on DOE's NEPA 35th Anniversary DOE Supports Interagency NEPA Modernization Work Groups Energy Policy Act Affects DOE NEPA Activities CEQ Cumulative Effects Guidance DOE Supplement Analysis Guidance 2005 Stakeholders Directory DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update

173

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2000 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2000 Welcome to the 23rd quarterly report on lessons learned in theNEPA process. This issue features highlights from the May 2000 NEPA Compliance Officers Meeting. Also featured is an article on NEPA and the wildfire at Los Alamos. This is an unusually long issue, due simply to the abundance of information to be shared. I encourage you to read the report cover to cover and file it for future reference. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Compliance Officers Celebrate 10 Years of Progress: Lessons Learned from Seasoned NCOs NEPA and Clean Air Act Conformity Guidance Draft Environmental Justice, Accident Analysis Guidance e-NEPA: What's New and What's Next Los Alamos Site-wide EIS Analyzed Wildfire, Prompted Mitigation

174

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2012 The need for timely preparation of quality EISs has not lessened since DOE initiated the NEPA Lessons Learned program in 1994. This issue provides advice on developing and maintaining EIS schedules from some of the Department's most experienced NEPA practitioners and highlights guidance and GIS tools that can help DOE prepare NEPA documents more efficiently. Articles in this issue include: How to Manage an EIS Schedule Successfully EPA Electronic Filing Scientific Integrity CEQ NEPA Efficiency Guidance Online Mapping Tools Keeping Track of NEPA Documents NAEP Conference Report Transitions 2013 NAEP Conference Announcement DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Update EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts

175

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2006 Welcome to the 46th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. DOE's senior managers play a vital role in NEPA implementation as evidenced by the settlement of Hanford NEPA litigation. Their participation in every EIS is important to ensure the scope and schedule support DOE's needs, as shown by an analysis of EIS metrics in this issue. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: Collaboration Yields Win-Win Solution at Hanford DOE Applies "Alternative NEPA Arrangements" After Ordering Coal Power Plant to Operate Congressional NEPA Task Force Staff Initial Report Quality Assurance in NEPA Documents NAEP Annual Conference DOE Solicits Comments on FutureGen

176

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1995 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 1995 December 1995 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1995 This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between July 1 and September 30, 1995. It is based primarily on responses to the revised questionnaire that was provided for use during January 1995, and includes information on direct and indirect NEPA process costs and on total project costs. Included in this issue: NEPA Document Preparation Times NEPA Cost Date NEPA Document Content The Document Preparation Process Effectiveness of the NEPA Process Other Lessons Learned Feature Stories Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Supplemental EIS Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility EIS Updates from the Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance The Need for Consistency in Accident Analyses

177

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2013 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 2013 June 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2013 In this issue, we highlight recent guidance by the Council on Environmental Quality and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to promote better integration of NEPA and Section 106 reviews and on the Federal Highway Administration's Every Day Counts initiative to better integrate planning and NEPA. Articles in this issue include: Integrating NEPA and NHPA Section 106 ACHP Extension of Programmatic Agreements Sutley Testifies on Importance of NEPA Every Day Counts at FHWA Guide for Public-Private Projects Earth Day at DOE GAO: Consider Climate Change Risks NAEP 2012 NEPA Report NAEP 2014 Conference Announcement NAEP Environmental Awards CEQ IT Working Group NEPA-CEQA Handbook in Preparation

178

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2003 Welcome to the 36th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the July 2003 NEPA Community Meeting in this issue. Also, please note that the cumulative index, a useful reference tool, is printed in this issue. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Included in this issue: DOE NEPA Community Gauges Progress In Its Continuing Pursuit of Excellence Floodplain and Wetland Regulations Effective September 26, 2003 NEPA Community Meeting Highlights Metrics Show Progress In Meeting Goals Getting from Here to There Lessons Learned Along the Way e-Government Approaches to EIS Distribution Procedures Evolving for Sensitive Information

179

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 Welcome to the 60th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the extraordinary support provided by our NCO volunteers and to introduce Scott Blake Harris, DOE General Counsel, and his plans for improving the DOE NEPA process. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE NCO Volunteers Lend a Hand To Expedite Recovery Act Projects DOE General Counsel Scott Blake Harris Aims To Improve the NEPA Review Process CEQ Report to Congress on Recovery Act DOE Grants NEPA Variances for Two Solicitations Introducing DOE's New General Counsel

180

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2003 Welcome to the 34th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the synergy between NEPA and the new DOE Order 450.1, Environmental Protection Program. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: New DOE Order Focuses on EMS, Supports Basic NEPA Principles Few Comments Received on Proposed Floodplain/Wetlands Rule Changes China's Environmental Impact Assessment Law DOI/Forest Service Proposed Categorical Exclusions Potential Resources for NEPA Practitioners A View from the Trenches Fossil Energy Launches EIS Process Improvement Team CEQ Updates EIS Distribution Saves Yucca Mountain Project $200,000

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 Welcome to the 50th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance launched the Lessons Learned program in December 1994 to support continuous improvement in the NEPA process. The Office began by presenting cost and time metrics and "What Worked and What Didn't Work." Other features were soon introduced. As always, we hope you read all of LLQR, and we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articles included in this issue: Flexibility of NEPA Process Facilitates Decisions for Strategic Petroleum Reserve Expansion DOE Cooperating Agency Report to CEQ GNEP PEIS to Examine Nuclear Fuel Recycling Proposal

182

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 Welcome to the 55th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the recent NAEP conference, Changing Climates, thanks to our on-the-scene reporter Carolyn Osborne. There are also several articles related to global climate change and NEPA. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articles included in this issue: Old NEPA Tools Still Work in a "Changing Climate" September Meeting: Making NEPA Work for DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Scoping Underappreciated Provisions of the CEQ Regulations CEQ Interagency Work Groups Make Progress

183

Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners...

184

2013 Annual NEPA Planning Summary | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2013 Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2013 Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2013 Annual NEPA Planning Summary More Documents & Publications 2013 Annual...

185

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Contracting Reform Guidance Contracting Reform Guidance NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance This documents provides guidance on NEPA contracting strategy, including: defining the work of the contractor; establishing contracts ahead of time; minimizing cost while maintaining quality. Guidance also provides: model statements of work, direction on NEPA contract management by NEPA Document Manager; a system for measuring NEPA costs and for evaluating contractor procedures; details on the DOE NEPA website. NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance More Documents & Publications NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996) Statement of Work-National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Support Services Acquisition: Preparation and Review of Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Assessments, Environmental Reports, and other Environmental

186

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

All Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) projects are reviewed under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 42 U.S.C. Section 4321 et seq.

187

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1999 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 1999 March 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1999 Welcome to the first quarter FY 1999 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: Dr. David Michaels DOEs New Leader for Environment, Safety and Health Society Promotes Lessons Learned Exchange at DOE Partnering Facilitates SPR Pipeline EA Mini-guidance An EIS Needs an Index When We Dont Know, Say So Extending Public Comment Periods Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to Issue New Section 106 Regulations DOE -wide NEPA Contracts Litigation Updates Executive Order Issued on Invasive Species Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2002

188

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY # 350 8 Revised 8/2/10 mjt Attachment 1 Written by Dan Smallwood Production Enhancement Project-5 T-2-34 to T-1-33 MIT all wells in this area to determine which are producing wells. There are 15 wells shut in this area because of no tank or shipping line. According to the old test sheet these wells make 24bbls oil and 120bbls of water. Two of these wells have leaks in the flow lines that will be fixed. One is 33-S-34 which could be run to 34-AX-34, about 400' .6 bbl/pd and the other is 35 shx 34 which could be run to 35-AX-34 which is about 200'.5bbl/pd. 42-AX-34 could be ran to 32-AX-34 and then to 33-SX-34 to 34-AX-34. There are two manifolds at T-2-34, one with 10 wells and the other with 12. None of the flow lines have valves or checks in the lines. I propose we flush, disconnect, and plug all wells that

189

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Survey Centralizer Design Date: 2-10-2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.71091 Contractor Code: 8067-762 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview 1. What are the environmental No environmental impacts. impacts? Run a logging tool through existing wells at : 2. What is the /ega/location? 67-LBT-3, SW SE sec 3, T38N , R78W 86-1 -X-10 , NE SE Sec 10, T38N , R78W 3. What is the duration of the project? 22-2-X-10H , NW NW Sec 10, T38N , R78W 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig, 4 Days etc.)? Stinger truck or crane . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

190

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2009 Welcome to the 61st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we highlight many of the ways that the NEPA process furthers transparency in government decisionmaking. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE Begins Online Posting of Categorical Exclusion Determinations CEQ Reports Timely NEPA Reviews for Recovery Act Comprehensive Draft EIS for Hanford Issued Y-12 Public Hearings Show Different Perspectives Revised Background Radiation Exposure Estimates Electronic CX Determination Form New Executive Order on Greenhouse Gases, Sustainability BPA Environmental Leadership Award

191

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

defining early what contractors should accomplish defining early what contractors should accomplish < establishing contracts ahead of time < minimizing cost while maintaining quality by * maximizing competition and use of incentives * using past performance information in awarding work * managing the NEPA process as a project This guidance provides: < model statements of work < information on contract types and incentives < direction on effective NEPA contract management by the NEPA Document Manager < a system for measuring NEPA process costs < NEPA contractor evaluation procedures < details on the DOE NEPA Web site U.S. Department of Energy, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance, December 1996 NEPA CONTRACTING REFORM GUIDANCE Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

192

Guidance Regarding NEPA Regulations | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Regulations Guidance Regarding NEPA Regulations This document provides Council on Environmental Quality guidance on several topics: scoping, categorical exclusions, adoption...

193

NEPA Terminology | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

NEPA Terminology A brief overview of some commonly used terms associated with the NEPA process Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) - The detailed written statement that is...

194

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1996) This guidance provides: model statements of work, information on contract types and incentives, direction on effective NEPA contract management by the NEPA Document...

195

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Project Information Project Title: Repair flowline at 83-AX-4 Date: 2-17-2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Bernard Winfrey Project Overview 1. What are the environmental Repair a flowline leak and test the line at 83-AX-4. Dug up pipeline, will backfill with clean fi ll dirt. Oil impacts? contaminated soil will be hauled to the east side landfarm and clean dirt will be brought in from section 20. 2. What is the legal location? 83-AX-4, N43 17'40.5" w. 10612'46.0" 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately 2 days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Backhoe with operator and one to three workers. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

196

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Project Information Project Title: T-6-10 abandoment and storage relocation Date: 912812009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be reclaiming this loc. we will dig down approx. 4ft. cut off pipes and cap them. And haul of dirt from the berms . We will then blade loc. . The worX to be done is to reclaim this location. In preparation for this 1. What are the environmental worX we will need to remove the old shipping building and a old set of tank stairs. These will be placed in storage in section 14. Upon reading SOP: EN.8000.01 reviewed on July 23rd 2009 I believe this falls under impacts? 2. What is the legal location? NEPA exclusion ex 81 .3 and CX 85.3. Which reads: When moving portable buildings to another disturbed

197

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

:;J/7 :;J/7 Project Information Project Title: B-1-3 Heat Trace Date: 10/14/09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview Routine maintenance activities for the buildings at B-1-3 using existing electrical rights-of-way, to repair and replace electrical lines from the electrical box to the existing buildings. This is a routine 1. What are the environmental Maintenance activities, to preserve the electrical function in the buildings at B-1-3. impacts? 2. What is the legal location? 1 Day 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used Ditch witch I Backhoe if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

198

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned Date: 8/4/2011 batteries, test satellites, and facilities DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned batteries, test satellites, and 1. Brief project description [include facilities : anything that could impact the environment] ex 81 .3 and ex 86.1 Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation or consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of equipment and underground piping , drainage control, and reseeding. NOD req uired to ensure compliance with Reclamation Procedures. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

199

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Restoration "F T-3-3 Date: 1212/2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 1. What are the environmental The environmental impacts will be minimal since this is already disturbed land. The legal is T-3-3. We will be impacts? digging down 5ft. and cutting off pipe and capping them. We will then blade the area and till it The 2. What is the legal location? equipment to used is as follows: backhoe, blade, cutting torch,and a tiller. The duration of this project will be approx. 2 days. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Speciali.st and the DOE NEPA

200

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnat ion Project Title: Geothermal Technologies Program - ORMAT Generator Date: 10-22-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: 8067-731 Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview 1. What are the environmental This NEPA is for the existing ORMAT geothermal processing unit that was used for testing during CRADA impacts? No 2007-083. The Original project consisted of the installation and 1 year testing of the binary geothermal power unit at the Tensleep battery using the hot produced water source as the heat medium. The unit is 2. What is the legal location? connected to the field electrical system for dissipation of the produced energy that is metered and monitored 3. What is the duration of the project? for reliability and quality. It is planned for the unit to remain in place so that an additional approximately 2.5

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EA 7. Cleanup of "non-reportable" spills of crude Date: 8/4/2011 oil &/or produced water DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview C-EA 7. Cleanup of "non-reportable" spills of crude oil &/or produced 1. Brief project description [include water : ex 85.4 and ex 85.6 anything that could impact the environment] Note : For all 85.4 : Repair of pipeline sections falls under USACE Nationwide Perm it Number 12, Utility Line Activity. For RMOTC's NEPA purposes, non-reportable spills of crude oil &/or produced water are less than one barrel that is NOT environmentally significant. Events that are environmentally significant include those that

202

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-$ )_Jp ~ R -$ )_Jp ~ R tW" I Project lnfonnation Project Title: New Drilling Location in Section 29 Date: 12-10-2009 DOE Code: 6730.020.78002 Contractor Code: 8067-371 Project Lead: Mar1< Duletsky Project Overview The project will involve excavating ~ backhoe pits to a depth of about 8 feet to observe soil characteristics 1. What are the environmental impacts? in the vicinity of our planned reserve pit excavation area. 2. What is the legal location? NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 29, T39N, R78W, Natrona County, Wyoming 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (worn over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the E. nvironmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

203

SN Environmental Review (NEPA)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Rates Rates You are here: SN Home page > Environment Environmental Review-NEPA Major Initiatives are the large projects that SNR is currently involved in. As new projects are added, and existing ones completed, you will find current information and updates in this area. Environmental Impact Statement-EIS Sacramento Area Voltage Support Trinity PUD Interconnection Projects Alternative Intake Project Transmission Line and Interconnection Delta-Mendota Canal / California Aqueduct Intertie (PDF - 17MB) Sutter Power Project San Luis Transmission Project Environmental Assessment-EA San Joaquin Valley Right-of-Way Maintenance Project North Area Right-of-Way Maintenance Project Sacramento Valley Right-of-Way Maintenance Project Categorical Exclusions-CX Cottonwood - Roseville OPGW Project CX (PDF - 6787KB)

204

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lnfonnat lnfonnat lon Project Title: Geothennal Technologies Program I Date : II0/20/09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61 041 I Contractor Code: lso67-73t Project Lead: Lyle Johnson TillS NEPA is for the laying of a 2.975 foot. 8" welded plastic wata ltnc from Lillie Teall<'!(~ Project Overview 1. 'Mlat are the environmental ncar in the Intersection with Teapot Creek to the North Waterllood Facility (NW F) building. The impacts? entire project area is within Section 21 T39N R 78W (map attached) and will not impact any wet 2. 'Mlat is the legal location? land areas but will cross one in tcnnittcnt stream. The stream is presently dry. The project will 3. 'Mlat is the duration of the project? include the clearing of vegetation from a 12 foot wide construction corridor along the route, digging

205

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

D D Project lnfonnation Project Title: Emergency flowline repair 78-sx-34 & 68-66-sx-34 Date: 12-29-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: RickM. Project Overview We dug up the line where the oil was coming out of the ground and had to put 2 clamps on to seal the leak. 1. What are the environmental impacts? The contaminated dirt was hauled to the land farm and after the line was tested we backfilled the hole. this job took 5 hrs. to complete and required a backhoe and two hands. this leak was 100 yards south of well No. 2. What is the legal location? 68-66-sx-34. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

206

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration 72-12-SX-1 0 Date: 2/26/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring 71-12-SX1 0. This will include digging 5ft down and cutting well head off and placing 1. What are the environmental impacts? OHM. We will haul contaminated soils to the Eastside landfarm and record in log book. We will replace all dirt hauled off with clean fill from sec.20. 2. What is the legal location? 71-12 SX10 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately 3-4 days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig , Backhoe with operator, welder, tiller and one worker. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

207

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Geothennal Technologies Program Date: 12-11-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview This NEPA is for the laying of a 350 foot. 8" welded plastic water line from the lower cooling pond at the 1. What are the environmental Tensleep battery to a location between the 5,000 bbl tank and the top pond at the Tensleep battery. The impacts? entire project area is within Section 10 T39N R78VV (map attached) and will not impact any wet land areas. 2. What is the legal location? The project will include the clearing of sparse vegetation from a 12 foot wide construction corridor along the 3. What is the duration of the project? route, digging a 5 foot deep trench. welding and placing the plastic line and covering and compacting the

208

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 'f>lf,M/9-~ ~of- Project lnfq,gnation Project Title: WhisperGenARelocation from 58-MX-10 ~o 65-S-10 ·~ I Date: 3/16/2010 DOE Code: -#Z'l?. Contractor Code: Project Lead: Everett Walker /41f-t#J ST _,J.tl Project Overview The Environmental Specialist and the Field Coordinator visited location and discussed the plan to remove 1. What are the environmental impacts? the WhisperGen unit, concrete pad, gas supply umbilical, and power conduit from the current location and move to higher visibility area with dry gas supply to supply power to 65-S-1 0. an existing well. There were 2 previous NEPAs # 211 on 5/27/09 and #240 on 10/01/09 2. What is the legal location? 58-MX-10 3. What is the duration of the project? Construction Two days/ Project Duration 6 months

209

ederal NEPA Contacts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Mr. Horst Greczmiel Mr. Horst Greczmiel Associate Director for NEPA Oversight 202-395-0827 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Division: Name: Address: Phone/Email: Agriculture Research Service Mr. Charles L. Walthall National Program Leader, Office of National Programs, Natural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural Systems 5601 Sunnyside Ave. Beltsville, MD 20705-5140 301-504-4634 301-504-6231 (fax) charlie.walthall@ars.usda.gov Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Elizabeth (Wendy) Nelson Environmental Protection Specialist 4700 River Road Unit 149 Riverdale, MD 20737 301-851-3089 elizabeth.e.nelson@aphis.usda.gov National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Ms. Mary Ann Rozum Natural Resources and Environmental Unit 1400 Independence Ave, SW

210

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 9  

SciTech Connect

This ninth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Chapters 4 and 6 in Hanford Site-related NEPA documents. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) includes information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological and historical resources, socioeconomics, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE directives and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site. Not all of the sections have been updated for this revision. The following lists the updated sections: climate and meteorology; ecology (threatened and endangered species section only); culture, archaeological, and historical resources; socioeconomics; all of Chapter 6.

Neitzel, D.A. [ed.] [ed.; Bjornstad, B.N.; Fosmire, C.J. [and others] [and others

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization. Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

This fifth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Information is presented on climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels, prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. Models are described that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. Federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable for the NEPA documents at the Hanford Site, are provided.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.] [ed.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This fifth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Information is presented on climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels, prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. Models are described that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. Federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable for the NEPA documents at the Hanford Site, are provided.

Cushing, C.E. (ed.) [ed.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

Property:NEPA CategoricalExclusion | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

CategoricalExclusion CategoricalExclusion Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA CategoricalExclusion Property Type Page Description Files documenting Categorical Exclusion Environmental Review and Approval. Include the Extraordinary Circumstances checklist here, if available. This is a property of type Page. It links to pages that use the form NEPA_Doc. Pages using the property "NEPA CategoricalExclusion" Showing 23 pages using this property. C CA-670-2010-107 + Ormat Geothermal Drilling Permit-Well 78A-6 CX-670 2010-107.pdf + D DOE-EA-1759 + CX-002447.pdf + DOI-BLM-ID-B010-2010-0083-CX + DOI-BLM-ID-B010-2010-0083-CX Agua Caliente Sandy Spring Road ROW.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2009-0030-CX + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2009-0030-CX.pdf +, DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2009-0030-CX.pdf +

214

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2001 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2001 Welcome to the 27th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles included in this issue: DOE Issues Supplement to Yucca Mountain Draft EIS Los Alamos Project Guided by MAP BPAs Readers Guide Cultural, Tribal, and Historic Updates Secretarial Policy on Cultural Resources Working with Indian Tribal Nations Historic Preservation Final Regulations Can Pilot Projects, Dispute Resolution Techniques Improve NEPA Implementation? DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Mini-guidance: DOE Public Reading Rooms Drafting Federal Register Notices Potential NEPA Implications of a National Energy Policy Nominee for CEQ Transitions Training Opportunities EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Recent EIS Milestones Cost and Time Facts

215

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 Welcome to the 55th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the recent NAEP conference, Changing Climates, thanks to our on-the-scene reporter Carolyn Osborne. There are also several articles related to global climate change and NEPA. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articles included in this issue: Old NEPA Tools Still Work in a "Changing Climate" September Meeting: Making NEPA Work for DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Scoping Underappreciated Provisions of the CEQ Regulations CEQ Interagency Work Groups Make Progress CEQ Highlights Innovative NEPA Procedures

216

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2006 Welcome to the 48th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We remember Lynton Caldwell, who promoted a vision of productive harmony - a balance of the interests of the environment and human society. The NEPA process remains a useful tool for pursuing that vision by integrating environmental analysis into the decisionmaking process. With this issue, we have completed 12 years of LLQR, with an emphasis on continuous improvement. As always, we welcome your suggestions. Articles included in this issue: Court Rejects Challenges to Yucca EIS, Transportation Plan Lynton Caldwell, "Father of NEPA," 1914-2006 Congressional NEPA Task Force Staff Final Report CEQ Work Groups Developing NEPA Guidance

217

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Fourth Quarter FY 2001 (12/5/01)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2001 December 5, 2001; Issue No. 29 CEQ Chair Describes Goals, Supports NEPA Principles The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) wants Federal agencies to weave environmental considerations into everyday business, as opposed to conducting NEPA compliance as a distinct project to fend off lawsuits. Recently appointed CEQ Chair James L. Connaughton (Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2001, page 12) described this and other key CEQ goals at a September 21, 2001, meeting with Federal agency NEPA Contacts. Mr. Connaughton made it clear that this administration supports NEPA’s principles “as much as all previous administrations.” In this connection, he referred to

218

CEQ Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Collaboration Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners o c t o b e r 2 0 0 7 c o u n c i l o n e n v i r o n m e n t a l q u a l i t y This handbook presents the results of research and consultations by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) concerning the consideration of collaboration in analyses prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). It introduces the NEPA practitioner and other interested parties to the issue of collaboration, outlines general principles, presents useful steps, and provides information on methods of collaboration. The handbook is informational and does not establish new requirements for collaboration or public involvement. It is not and should not be viewed as formal CEQ guidance on this matter, nor are the recommendations in the handbook intended

219

Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Council on Environmental Quality memorandum provides general information on (1) the response to hurricane Katrina; (2) reporting oil and chemical spills; (3) projected long term recovery efforts; and (4) how agencies can respond to emergencies and comply with NEPA.

220

Memorandum: Emergency Actions and NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8, 2005 8, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR FEDERAL NEPA CONTACTS FROM: HORST G. GRECZMIEL Associate Director for NEPA Oversight SUBJECT: Emergency Actions and NEPA This memorandum provides: * General information on the response to Katrina * Reporting oil and chemical spills * Projected long term recovery efforts * How agencies can respond to emergencies and comply with NEPA. Please distribute this memorandum to your agency planning and environmental personnel. General information on the response to Katrina: Information is available on the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov and specifics on the government's response are provided at the "What Government is Doing" link which can be directly accessed at http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0712.xml

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

CEQ NEPA & EMS Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Environmental Policy Act Processes with Environmental Management Systems c o u n c i l o n e n v i r o n m e n t a l q u a l i t y A Guide for NEPA and EMS Practitioners a p r i l 2 0 0 7 Preface This guide builds on research and consultations undertaken by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) on the complementary aspects of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Environmental Management Systems (EMS). It introduces issues and provides information on how NEPA and EMS can be aligned. This guide does not establish new requirements, does not constitute formal CEQ guidance, and its recommendations should not be considered legally binding. A Guide for NEPA and EMS Practitioners  Aligning National Environmental Policy Act Processes with Environmental Management Systems

222

NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Documents Documents NEPA Documents To see a list of available NEPA documents by type and sorted by publication date, click on the links below. Documents listed in this section are available to members of the public. To see documents not electronically available to the public see the Secure NEPA Documents page for more information. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Categorical exclusions are categories of actions that DOE has determined, by regulation, do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and for which, therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement normally is required. DOE's categorical exclusions are listed in Appendices A and B to Subpart D of its NEPA regulations,10 CFR Part 1021.

223

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2004 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2004 Welcome to the 38th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue we are continuing a multi-part examination of lessons learned from Lessons Learned. We invite your suggestions on how to improve the Lessons Learned program. Thank you for your continuing support. Included in this issue: New, Improved "Green Book" Is on the Way Modern Pit Facility Final EIS Delayed NNSA Withdraws FONSI for LANL Biosafety Lab BLM Programmatic EIS On Wind Energy Lesson Learned about Schedule and Teamwork CEQ Chair Emphasizes NEPA's "Productive Harmony" Goal Supporting Flexible Decisionmaking in Practice NEPA Champions Brief Congressional Staff

224

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 Welcome to the 53rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Many in the Department's NEPA Community were called on to give extraordinary time and resources to the preparation of key EISs issued recently and highlighted in this LLQR. We anticipate a busy 2008 as well. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Included in this issue: Multiple, Complex EISs Support DOE Missions; What Will the New Year Bring? Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in DOE NEPA Documents Is Evolving OMB and OSTP Issue Risk Analysis Principles Feature: Key EISs Yucca Mountain EISs Clean Coal EISs Western Energy Corridors Programmatic EIS FONSI Not a Foregone Conclusion

225

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2004 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2004 Welcome to the 39th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue we are continuing a multi-part examination of lessons learned from Lessons Learned. We invite your suggestions on how to improve the Lessons Learned program. Thank you for your continuing support. Articles included in this issue: "Open House" Format for Scoping Meetings Provides DOE Valuable Input for Yucca Rail EIS Lesson Learned from Lessons Learned Apply Common Sense: Reduce Unfamilar Abbreviations Carbon Sequestration Programmatic EIS The Libyan Connection: Emergency Action Needed NEPA Strategy Adjusts to Changing Circumstances Card Game Highlights Diversity at NEPA Clinic

226

General Guidance on NEPA | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

General Guidance on NEPA General Guidance on NEPA General Guidance on NEPA Selected documents providing General Guidance on NEPA. March 1, 2011 DOE, NEPA, and YOU A pamphlet providing information on public participation and NEPA. December 1, 2007 A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard This guide is based on research and consultations undertaken by the Council on Environmental Quality concerning the need for a Citizen's Guide to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Participants in NEPA Regional Roundtables held in 2003-2004 clearly voiced the need for an guide that provides an explanation of NEPA, how it is implemented, and how people outside the Federal government - individual citizens, private sector applicants, members of organized groups, or representatives of Tribal,

227

GC NEPA Listserv | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Action Center » Sign Up for GC Updates » GC NEPA Listserv Action Center » Sign Up for GC Updates » GC NEPA Listserv GC NEPA Listserv Subscribe to NEPA Updates The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance maintains two Listserv lists to provide a central notification system for (1) DOE NEPA news, including announcements, notices, and related documents posted on this website, and (2) draft Environmental Assessments. Please use the following instructions to subscribe to both or either of these updates. * NEPA-Updates Listserv: Receive email notification of NEPA News updates in your email inbox, by sending an email to Listserv@listserv.doe.gov with "Subscribe NEPA-Updates" followed by your FIRST NAME and LAST NAME, in the body of the email (i.e., Subscribe NEPA-Updates John Doe). Do not include your signature block or any other data in the body of the

228

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Log Deep Well Log Deep Well Date: 1/1212010 DOE Code: 6730.020.81019 Contractor Code: I 8067-756 Project Lead: Brian Black Project Overview This project will test prototype logg1 n_g tools 1 n a previously drilled deep well. The should not be any neglible 1. What are the environmental impacts? impacts to the environment. The tools will be lowered up and down a wellbore Via wireline cable and truck. 2. What is the legal location? This test will take place on the drilling rig at 45-3-X-21 3. What is the duration of the project? 4, What major equipment will be used The project will last for 3-4 days. if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The drilling ng will be used as a overflead crane to lift the sheave pulley that the cable will run across. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

229

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project Information Project T itle: Repair flowline 77 -S-1 0 Date: 3111/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Wes Riesland Project Overview The flowline leak at 77 -s-1 0 surfaced on the location but we had to follow the line off the location to find the 1. What are the environmental impacts? hole in the pipe. This took us up the hill going south aproximatily 120 feet from the well head. We were able 2. What is the legal location? to successfully clamp the leak. 3. What is the duration of the projed? This flowline runs from the well 77 -s-1 0 to the B-2-1 0 manifold. 4. What major equipment will be used Approximately 6 hours to complete if any (worn over rig. drilling rig. etc.)? backhoe and opperator and one hand The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

230

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

. NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project lnfonnation Project Title: Reclamation of Pits and Boxes Date: Nov. 3, 2010 DOE Code: 6740.010.00000 Contractor Code: 8067-451 Project Lead: Anthony Bowler Project Overview Reclamation of QD.]y the following Pits and Boxes : 1. Brief project description [include 1. B-2-1 0 Skim Box anything that could impact the 2. B-1-14 Skim Box environment 3. Near66-1-STX-14 Pit 2. Legal location 4. T-5-10 Skim Box 3. Duration of the project 5. WDFUpperPit 6. WDFLowerPit 4. Major equipment to be used 7. WDFSkimBox 8. B-1-3 Pit 9. B-1 -3 Skim Box 10. T-2-34 Pit 11 . B-1-10 Pit 12. B-1 -10 Skim Box 13. SE of SG3 & Welding Shop Skim Box 14. 58.Q4-1-SX-3 Skim Box 15. Near Tank 126 Skim Box 16. 77-1-SX-3 NW of Well Pit 17. T-5-3 Pit

231

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Repair flowline 100 feet North of 71-3-SX-3 Date: 2-16-2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Rick Mclaughlin Project Overview Emergency Repair tor a "owline leak north of 71-3-SX-3. Dug up pipeline, repaired line and backfilled with 1. What are the environmental impacts? clean fill dirt. Oil contaminated soH was hauled to the east side landfarm and dean dirt was brought in from section 20. 2 What 1s the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? North of 71-3-SX-3. N43 1 7'53 6~ W. 10611'49.3" 4. What major equipment will be used Approximately 4 hours if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe with operator and one wor1NEPA

232

NEPA Cases Filed in 2010 2010 NEPA Case Dispositions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Filed in 2010 2010 NEPA Case Dispositions Filed in 2010 2010 NEPA Case Dispositions Lead Defendant Cases Filed Injunctions - Remands Judgment for defendant 46 ARMY-USACE 6 3 Dismissal w/o settlement 11 DHS-USCG 0 0 Settlement 8 DOD 1 0 Adverse dispositions: 17 DOE-Energy 0 0 TRO 0 DOE-FERC 0 0 Preliminary Injunction 5 DOE-NNSA 1 0 Permanent Injunction 4 DOI-BIA 1 0 Remand 8 DOI-BLM 17 5 DOI-BOEM 5 0 Basis for 2010 NEPA Dispositions DOI-BOR 0 0 Jurisdictional - P prevailed 0 DOI-FWS 6 1 Jurisdictional - D prevailed 12 DOI-OSM 0 1 NEPA - Not required 1 DOI-NPS 2 2 NEPA - Is required 2 DOJ 0 0 CE - Adequate 4 DOS 0 0 CE - Not Adequate 1 DOT-FAA 3 0 EA - Adequate* 11 DOT-FHWA 10 1 EA - Not Adequate* 5 DOT-FTA 2 0 EIS - Adequate* 17 EPA 1 0 EIS - Not Adequate* 5

233

NEPA and Other Laws | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NEPA and Other Laws NEPA and Other Laws NEPA and Other Laws Selected documents providing guidance on the relationship between NEPA and other laws. March 5, 2013 NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews (Draft) The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), in collaboration with the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, issued on March 5, 2013, a draft handbook on integrating NEPA and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review processes. The guide provides practitioners with an overview of NEPA and CEQA as well as valuable suggestions for developing a single environmental review process that can meet the requirements of both statutes. March 5, 2013 NEPA and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 In this document the Council on Environmental Quality and the Advisory

234

Procedures for Submitting Documents for Posting on the DOE NEPA...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Submitting Documents for Posting on the DOE NEPA Website The Electronic DOE NEPA document archive is the only centralized electronic collection of DOE NEPA documents....

235

DOE Policy on NEPA Process Transparency and Openness | Department...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in Appendix B of the Department's NEPA implementing procedures, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021. DOE Policy on NEPA Process Transparency and Openness More Documents & Publications NEPA...

236

Federal Agency NEPA Implementing Procedures  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Agency NEPA Implementing Procedures Agency NEPA Implementing Procedures Note: Some Departments' agencies have their own NEPA implementing procedures. To access Department-wide NEPA implementing procedures, click on the name of the Federal Department. To access NEPA implementing procedures for Department's agencies, click on the provided links. Department/ Agency: Division: Link: Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi- in/text- idx?c=ecfr&SID=47c103e07fd64e933c7f74c 4b3c4ac9a&rgn=div5&view=text&node=7:6. 1 2 1 8&id 7 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- idx?c=ecfr&SID=47c103e07fd64e933c7f74c 4b3c4ac9a&rgn=div5&view=text&node=7:5. 1.1.1.21&idno=7 Farm Service Agency http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-

237

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1996 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1996 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: Defense Programs NCO Fosters Teamwork through Meetings Internal Scoping at Richland Visual Excellence Responding to Comments on DOE EISs Improving Comment Resolution with EPA EPA Commends DOE for "Model" Pollution Prevention Analysis Litigation Updates 1996 Federal Environmental Quality Award Winners: USACE and MMS Amended Rule Streamlines DOE NEPA Process Book Review: Environmental Impact Assessment Third quarter FY 1996 Lessons Learned Questionnaire results, including EIS and EA cost and time reports, and analysis models and codes used in DOE EAs and EISs

238

NEPA Implementation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Implementation Implementation NEPA Implementation Selected documents providing guidance on the implementation of NEPA. September 7, 2012 OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution This Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) joint memorandum expands and builds on the November 28, 2005, Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) Memorandum, directing departments and agencies to increase the appropriate and effective use of third-party assisted environmental collaboration as well as environmental conflict resolution to resolve problems and conflicts that arise in the context of environmental, public lands, or natural resources issues, including matters related to energy, transportation, and water and land management.

239

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

;l,[p~ ;l,[p~ Project Information Project Title: Restoration of 54-TPX-1 0 Date: DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 1. What are the environmental We will be restoring 54-TPX-10. The work to be done will be to dig 5ft below surface cut casing and impacts? install a marker. We will do the same with the flowline. Any contaminated soil will be replaced with clean fill dirt. The contaminated soil will be transferrred to the lanclfarm. The base will be moved to section 14. 2. What is the legal location? We will then blade, till and reseed with native grasses. The equipment to be used will be as follows: 3. What is the duration of the project? Backhoe, Blade, Shovels, Torch, Welder, And Tiller. This project will also require a hotwork permit for the

240

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Water haul permit location Date: 2-4-10 DOE Code: 6730-02()-51132 Contractor Code: 8067-757 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview 1. What are the environmental This is a proposal to move the Water Haul line from the current location to the opposite side of the road. This impacts? action is for environmental and safety considerations. During the rainy season the area adjacent to the loading area becomes extremely muddy. The vehicles using the loading are become loaded down and 2. What is the legal location? cause ruts into the bank of the little teapot creek and on the graded areas. Moving the loading station to a 3. What is the duration of the project? higher position will eliminate the concerns. A pump will be used to draw water from the creek to a 400 bbl

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization, Revision 15  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents being prepared by DOE contractors. No statements of significance or environmental consequences are provided. This year's report is the thirteenth revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the fourteenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is typically presented in environmental impact statements (Weiss) and other Hanford Site NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological, and historical resources, socioeconomics, occupational safety, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to the NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities.

Neitzel, Duane A.; Bunn, Amoret L.; Burk, Kenneth W.; Cannon, Sandra D.; Duncan, Joanne P.; Fowler, Richard A.; Fritz, Brad G.; Harvey, David W.; Hendrickson, Paul L.; Horton, Duane G.; Last, George V.; Poston, Ted M.; Prendergast-Kennedy, Ellen L.; Reidel, Steve P.; Scott, Michael J.; Thorne, Paul D.; Woody, Dave M.

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents being prepared by DOE contractors. No statements of significance or environmental consequences are provided. This year's report is the sixteenth revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the seventeenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is typically presented in environmental impact statements (Weiss) and other Hanford Site NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological, and historical resources, socioeconomics, occupational safety and health, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to the NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities.

Neitzel, Duane A.; Bunn, Amoret L.; Cannon, Sandra D.; Duncan, Joanne P.; Fowler, Richard A.; Fritz, Brad G.; Harvey, David W.; Hendrickson, Paul L.; Hoitink, Dana J.; Horton, Duane G.; Last, George V.; Poston, Ted M.; Prendergast-Kennedy, Ellen L.; Reidel, Steve P.; Rohay, Alan C.; Scott, Michael J.; Thorne, Paul D.

2004-09-22T23:59:59.000Z

243

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents being prepared by DOE contractors. No statements of significance or environmental consequences are provided. This year's report is the thirteenth revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the fourteenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is typically presented in environmental impact statements (Weiss) and other Hanford Site NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological, and historical resources, socioeconomics, occupational safety, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to the NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities.

Neitzel, Duane A.; Antonio, Ernest J.; Eschbach, Tara O.; Fowler, Richard A.; Goodwin, Shannon M.; Harvey, David W.; Hendrickson, Paul L.; Hoitink, Dana J.; Horton, Duane G.; Last, George V.; Poston, Ted M.; Prendergast, Ellen L.; Rohay, Alan C.; Thorne, Paul D.

2001-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

244

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents being prepared by DOE contractors. No statements of significance or environmental consequences are provided. This year's report is the thirteenth revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the fourteenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is typically presented in environmental impact statements (Weiss) and other Hanford Site NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological, and historical resources, socioeconomics, occupational safety, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to the NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities.

Neitzel, Duane A.; Bunn, Amoret L.; Duncan, Joanne P.; Eschbach, Tara O.; Fowler, Richard A.; Fritz, Brad G.; Goodwin, Shannon M.; Harvey, David W.; Hendrickson, Paul L.; Hoitink, Dana J.; Horton, Duane G.; Last, George V.; Poston, Ted M.; Prendergast-Kennedy, Ellen L.; Rohay, Alan C.; Scott, Michael J.; Thorne, Paul D.

2002-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

Designating and Supporting NEPA Document Managers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The purpose of this memorandum is to emphasize the important role that National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Document Managers play in the success of the DOE's NEPA compliance program and to help maximize their effectiveness.

246

NEPA Policy Statement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Policy Statement NEPA Policy Statement NEPA Policy Statement The NEPA process is a valuable planning tool and provides an opportunity to improve the Department of Energy decisions and build public trust. Reviews of the Department's NEPA program have shown that the Department must change the way it conducts its business to avoid unnecessary delays and reap the full benefits of the NEPA process. The Department must conduct the process as a team effort to make NEPA work better and cost less. The following new policies will streamline the NEPA process, minimize the cost and time for document preparation and review, emphasize teamwork, and make the process more useful to decision makers and the public. Except where specifically indicated otherwise, these policies are immediately effective.

247

Category:NEPA Properties | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Properties Properties Jump to: navigation, search These are properties specific to NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) Documents. Additional properties are used in the documents. Pages in category "NEPA Properties" The following 52 pages are in this category, out of 52 total. A Property:Applicant B Property:BLM CaseType C Property:CXReference D Property:DayQuantity E Property:EnergyTechnology Property:EnvironmentalAnalysisType F Property:FundingAgencies G Property:GeothermalDevelopmentPhases L Property:LeadAgency M Property:ManagingDistrictOffice Property:ManagingFieldOffice Property:MineralManager N Property:NEPA Application Property:NEPA Application Type Property:NEPA Application Url Property:NEPA ApplicationAttachments Property:NEPA ApplicationDate Property:NEPA CategoricalExclusion

248

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2005 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2005 March 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2005 Welcome to the 42nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to introduce our new Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health. John Spitaleri Shaw is a strong supporter of good NEPA compliance, as evidenced during our interview with him and in his February 16, 2005, memorandum, both of which are summarized in this issue. Articles included in this issue: New Assistant Secretary Shaw Promotes NEPA as Essential to Energy Mission and Goals EH Brief on Consultation with Native Americans Updated Green Book Issued New Forest Service Regulations EIS Distribution Guidance in Preparation CEQ Revises Cooperating Agency Reporting IAIA Conference NAEP Conference Transitions DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update

249

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 Welcome to the 60th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the extraordinary support provided by our NCO volunteers and to introduce Scott Blake Harris, DOE General Counsel, and his plans for improving the DOE NEPA process. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE NCO Volunteers Lend a Hand To Expedite Recovery Act Projects DOE General Counsel Scott Blake Harris Aims To Improve the NEPA Review Process CEQ Report to Congress on Recovery Act DOE Grants NEPA Variances for Two Solicitations Introducing DOE's New General Counsel Mercury Storage EIS Under Way

250

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2011 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2011 Welcome to the 66th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue focuses on the Administration's new NEPA guidance and related initiatives - on scientific integrity, regulatory improvement, mitigation and monitoring, and filing EISs - and DOE's proposal to modernize its NEPA regulations. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE Proposes Revisions to Its NEPA Rule To Modernize Categorical Exclusions EPA Issues EIS Filing Guidance Executive Order Seeks To Improve Regulations CEQ Mitigation and Monitoring Guidance White House Guidance on Scientific Integrity Cooperating Agency Report to CEQ

251

NEPA Terminology | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

NEPA Terminology | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing...

252

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Calibration Facilities Ecosystem Management Team Environmental Justice Environmental Management...

253

NEPA Lessons Learned September 2011 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 1 1 The median cost and time to complete DOE environmental assessments (EAs) decreased substantially during 2009 and 2010, according to data collected by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (NEPA Office), even though DOE's overall NEPA workload more than doubled during the same time period (Figures 1 and 2). The improved performance metrics are attributable to the preparation of

254

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 1, 1995 March 1, 1995 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1995 This second quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between October 1 and December 31, 1994. It is based on responses to the revised questionnaire that was provided for use during Janua~ 1995, and includes information on direct and indirect NEPA process costs and on total project costs. Additionally, the report includes a feature story on lessons learned during preparation of the F-Canyon Plutonium Solutions Environmental Impact Statement. December 1, 1994 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1994 On August 12, 1994 the Office of NEPA Oversight distributed an interim/draft lessons learned questionnaire to NEPA contacts to be used for reporting on environmental impact statements and environmental assessments

255

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2013 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2013 December 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2013 Welcome to the 77th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue reminds us that, through teamwork and dedication by DOE's NEPA community, we can produce high quality documents that enhance the Department's decisionmaking and help protect the environment. Articles in this issue include: Was Your NEPA Process Just One More Hurdle, or Did It Make a Difference? Bonneville Participates in Regional Infrastructure Team EPA EIS Mapper Tool Online Tribal Training Key Reference Document on Climate Change Golden Field Office Relocates Golden FONSI Template EPA Ratings of DOE Draft EISs New Migratory Bird MOU Jim Daniel To Retire Transitions EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Cost and Time Facts

256

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2011 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2011 This issue celebrates the revision of DOE's NEPA regulations, which became effective on November 14, 2011. The culmination of a 2-year rulemaking process, the regulations establish 20 new categorical exclusions and revise other provisions to promote efficiency and transparency. Articles in this issue include: DOE Updates NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency and Transparency EPA Web Resource on EJ and NEPA DOE NEPA Website Tools Informal Public Involvement at Livermore Can We Issue a ROD on Monday? Keep the Public Informed When EIS Plans Change Final CEQ Recovery Act Report to Congress CEQ Selects Pilot Projects to Improve NEPA Efficiency Fugitive Emissions Working Group Wins Award Guidance on Health Impact Assessment

257

All NEPA Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance & Requirements » Guidance » All NEPA Guidance Guidance & Requirements » Guidance » All NEPA Guidance All NEPA Guidance Council on Environmental Quality Guidance Final Guidance on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely Environmental Reviews Under the National Environmental Policy Act (2012) Appropriate Use of Mitigation and Monitoring and Clarifying the Appropriate Use of Mitigated Findings of No Significant Impact (2011) Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on Establishing, Applying, and Revising Categorical Exclusions under NEPA (2010) Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and NEPA (2010) A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard (2007) Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in Cumulative Effects Analysis (2005) Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and

258

Other NEPA Guidance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other NEPA Guidance Other NEPA Guidance Other NEPA Guidance Selected documents prepared by a variety of agencies that provide guidance on the NEPA process. December 31, 2009 Presidential Proclamation on the 40th Anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act Proclamation of President Obama to "call upon all executive branch agencies to promote public involvement and transparency in their implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act." July 1, 1998 Managing NEPA at the Department of Energy A report, by the National Academy of Public Administration, on the management of NEPA within the Department of Energy. January 23, 1995 The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups On March 31, 1994, officials from the Departrnent of Energy (DOE), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Council on Environmental

259

NEPA Litigation Surveys | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Litigation Surveys NEPA Litigation Surveys NEPA Litigation Surveys CEQ publishes surveys on NEPA litigation on an annual basis. These surveys identify the number of cases involving a NEPA based cause of action, Federal agencies that were identified as a lead defendant, general information on plaintiffs, general information on why litigation was pursued, and the outcomes of the cases decided during the year. Each year, Federal agencies conduct hundreds of EISs, tens of thousands of EAs and hundreds of thousands of CEs. The amount of litigation on these NEPA analyses is comparatively small. Since 2001, fewer than 175 NEPA cases were filed each year - with less than 100 filed in 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011. The annual surveys are provided below: 2011 Litigation Survey 2010 Litigation Survey

260

NEPA Litigation Surveys | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Litigation Surveys NEPA Litigation Surveys NEPA Litigation Surveys CEQ publishes surveys on NEPA litigation on an annual basis. These surveys identify the number of cases involving a NEPA based cause of action, Federal agencies that were identified as a lead defendant, general information on plaintiffs, general information on why litigation was pursued, and the outcomes of the cases decided during the year. Each year, Federal agencies conduct hundreds of EISs, tens of thousands of EAs and hundreds of thousands of CEs. The amount of litigation on these NEPA analyses is comparatively small. Since 2001, fewer than 175 NEPA cases were filed each year - with less than 100 filed in 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011. The annual surveys are provided below: 2011 Litigation Survey 2010 Litigation Survey

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

3rd Quarter 2013 Domestic Uranium Production Report  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

5 5 3rd Quarter 2013 Domestic Uranium Production Report Release Date: October 31, 2013 Next Release Date: February 2014 2012 1st Quarter 2013 2nd Quarter 2013 3rd Quarter 2013 Cameco Crow Butte Operation Dawes, Nebraska 1,000,000 Operating Operating Operating Operating Hydro Resources, Inc. Church Rock McKinley, New Mexico 1,000,000 Partially Permitted And Licensed Partially Permitted And Licensed Partially Permitted And Licensed Partially Permitted And Licensed Hydro Resources, Inc. Crownpoint McKinley, New Mexico 1,000,000 Partially Permitted And Licensed Partially Permitted And Licensed Partially Permitted And Licensed Partially Permitted And Licensed Lost Creek ISR, LLC, a subsidiary of Ur- Energy USA Inc. Lost Creek Project Sweetwater, Wyoming 2,000,000 Under Construction Under Construction

262

2006 NEPA Survey.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Navy 1 0 Adverse dispositions: 120 NRC 3 1 TRO 1 DOI - BLM 21 14 Preliminary Injunction 8 - FWS 6 3 Permanent Injunction 16 - BuRec 0 1 Remand 48 - NPS 0 3 Dismissal w/ settlement 13 - BIA/NIGC 1 0 Dismissal w/o settlement 34 - MMS 0 0 Case pending, NEPA 195 - OSM 0 0 USDA - FS 30 33 - APHIS 2 1 DOC - NOAA 4 4 Army - COE 25 7 Gov't Agency Army 0 2 Jurisdictional - P prevailed 13 DOT - FHWA 7 1 Jurisdictional - D prevailed 14 - FTA 1 0 NEPA - Not required 4 - FAA 3 0 NEPA - Is required 0 - MARAD 0 0 CE - Adequate 9 - SLSC 0 0 CE - Not Adequate 4 DOE 0 1 EA - Adequate* 27 EPA 2 0 EA - Not Adequate* 23 HUD 0 0 EIS - Adequate* 29 Air Force 0 1 EIS - Not Adequate* 26 TVA 0 0 SEIS - Needed* 14 NSF 0 0 SEIS -Not Needed* 4 FCC 0 0 GSA 0 0 FDA 0 0 Total 108 72 27 Public Interest groups

263

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 3, 2008; Issue No...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Quality Dinah Bear participated in a Ministerial Conference on Europe and North Asia Forest Law Enforcement and Governance in Russia in 2005. When you asked Dinah Bear for...

264

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 Welcome to the 49th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we feature the initiation of three significant EISs: the Complex 2030 Supplemental Programmatic EIS, the Supplemental Yucca Mountain Repository EIS, and the expanded Yucca Mountain Rail EIS. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: NNSA Pursues Complex 2030 Vision Through Supplemental Programmatic EIS Scoping Process Underway for Two Yucca Mountain EISs Address Sabotage and Terrorism in EISs and EAs Special Environmental Analysis for Emergency Actions CEQ Work Groups Develop NEPA Guidance EIS Study Emphasizes Need for Quality and Clarity

265

Water Permits (Louisiana)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Water Permits Division authorizes permits administered under the Water Quality Regulations. Louisiana's Water Quality Regulations require permits for the discharge of pollutants from any point...

266

DOE NEPA: Getting Better and Better 2000-2004 (07/04)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for Analyzing Accidents Under NEPA Policies on Application of NEPA to CERCLA and RCRA NEPA Community Meeting Washington, DC CEQ NEPA Task Force Established (DOE...

267

Secure NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents The Department of Energy (DOE) limits electronic access to certain NEPA documents on this website due to the potential security sensitivity of some information these documents may contain. DOE regrets any inconvenience caused by this decision, which reflects an awareness of the need to protect the public. Requesting Secure NEPA Documents You may request copies of documents by e-mail or by leaving a message on our toll-free information line at 1-800-472-2756. Please provide the following information in your request: Title and Number of Document requested First Name: Last Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Organization (If Applicable): E-mail: Phone: List of Secure NEPA Documents May 1, 1984 EIS-0108: Final Environmental Impact Statement

268

Pollution Prevention Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pollution Prevention Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers Pollution Prevention Checklists for NEPA/309 Reviewers US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Federal Activities POLLUTION PREVENTION - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REDUCTION CHECKLISTS FOR NEPA/309 REVIEWERS JANUARY 1995 Prepared by SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 7600-A LEESBURG PIKE FALLS CHURCH, VA 22043 EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-W2-0026 EPA WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. 33-II SAIC PROJECT NO. 01-1030-07-1605-000 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 What Is Pollution Prevention? 1.2 Why Practice Pollution Prevention? 2.0 INCORPORATING POLLUTION PREVENTION INTO NEPA 3.0 POLLUTION PREVENTION/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REDUCTION CHECKLISTS FOR NEPA REVIEWERS q Checklist for Energy Management file:///D|/40369.010_EPA%20NEPA%20CD/Old/HTML/Pollprev.htm (1 of 10) [9/11/2002 2:19:58 PM]

269

Secure NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents Secure NEPA Documents The Department of Energy (DOE) limits electronic access to certain NEPA documents on this website due to the potential security sensitivity of some information these documents may contain. DOE regrets any inconvenience caused by this decision, which reflects an awareness of the need to protect the public. Requesting Secure NEPA Documents You may request copies of documents by e-mail or by leaving a message on our toll-free information line at 1-800-472-2756. Please provide the following information in your request: Title and Number of Document requested First Name: Last Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Organization (If Applicable): E-mail: Phone: List of Secure NEPA Documents April 1, 2007 EIS-0376: Final Environmental Impact Statement

270

NEPA and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 | Department  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 NEPA and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 In this document the Council on Environmental Quality and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) provide advice to Federal agencies, applicants, project sponsors, and consultants on how to take advantage of existing regulatory provisions to align the NEPA process and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 review process. Federal agencies have independent statutory obligations under NEPA and NHPA. The handbook and a joint letter from CEQ and ACHP are available for download here. G-CEQ-NEPA_NHPA_Section_106_Handbook_Mar2013.pdf CEQ_ACHP_LTR_NEPA_NHPA_Handbook_MAR2013.pdf More Documents & Publications

271

NEPA Lessons Learned September 2010 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 1 0 1 The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) recently issued its report on the NEPA process related to drilling of the Macondo well, which was the source of the April 20, 2010, accident and subsequent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The report contains useful reminders to all NEPA practitioners of the importance of transparency and accountability in the NEPA process. It

272

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 7  

SciTech Connect

This seventh revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes up-to-date information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, environmental monitoring, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors. Chapter 5.0 was not updated from the sixth revision (1994). It describes models, including their principal underlying assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. The updated Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE Orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site, following the structure of Chapter 4.0. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be used directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.] ed.; Baker, D.A.; Chamness, M.A. [and others] and others

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 8  

SciTech Connect

This eighth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Chapters 4 and 6 in Hanford Site-related NEPA documents. Chapter 4 (Affected Environment) includes information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, historical, archaeological and cultural resources, socioeconomics, and noise. Chapter 6 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE directives and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site. The following sections were updated in this revision: climate and meteorology; ecology (threatened and endangered species section only); historical; archaeological and cultural resources; and all of chapter 6. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be used directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

Neitzel, D.A. [ed.] [ed.; Bjornstad, B.N.; Fosmire, C.J.; Fowler, R.A. [and others] [and others

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 6  

SciTech Connect

This sixth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes up-to-date information on climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors; Chapter 5.0 has been significantly updated from the fifth revision. It describes models, including their principal underlying assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions; The updated Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site, following the structure of Chapter 4.0. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be utilized directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.; Baker, D.A.; Chamness, M.A. [and others

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

DOE-NEPA-Document-CertificationandTransmittalFormAugust2012.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Policy and Compliance August 2012 NEPA Policy and Compliance August 2012 DOE NEPA Document Certification and Transmittal Form 1. NEPA Document #:_____________________________(e.g., DOE/EIS-XXX, DOE/EA-XXXX) Document date:_____________________________________________________________ Title:______________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ 2. NEPA Document Keywords: Keyword 1:___________________________ Keyword 2:____________________________ Keyword 3:___________________________ Keyword 4:____________________________ Keyword 5:___________________________ Keyword 6:____________________________ 3. Contact Information: Organization:_______________________________________________________________________

276

NETL National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Staff Bios CONTACT NETL Visiting NETL People Search Go to US DOE Publications NETL National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents NETL Categorical Exclusions NETL...

277

Annual NEPA Planning Summary Report Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

A Microsoft Excel file for use as a template when preparing and submitting an Annual NEPA Planning Summary. Instructions provided within the file.

278

NEPA?a grand new idea  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

When the NEPA project began to loose momentum, in 1949 the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) project was established at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This project expanded...

279

Recommendations for Analyzing Accidents Under NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This DOE guidance clarifies and supplements "Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements." It focuses on principles of accident analyses under NEPA.

280

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

,. u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION Page I of2 RECIPIENT: Air Resources Board STATE: CA PROJECT TITLE: Validation of Hydrogen Refueling...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

NEPA Reading Room | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NEPA Reading Room | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing...

282

3rd Quarter 2013 Domestic Uranium Production Report  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3rd Quarter 2013 Domestic Uranium Production Report 3rd Quarter 2013 Domestic Uranium Production Report 3rd Quarter 2013 Domestic Uranium Production Report Release Date: October 31, 2013 Next Release Date: February 2014 Capacity (short tons of ore per day) 2012 1st Quarter 2013 2nd Quarter 2013 3rd Quarter 2013 EFR White Mesa LLC White Mesa Mill San Juan, Utah 2,000 Operating Operating Operating Operating-Processing Alternate Feed Energy Fuels Resources Corporation Piñon Ridge Mill Montrose, Colorado 500 Partially Permitted And Licensed Partially Permitted And Licensed Partially Permitted And Licensed Permitted And Licensed Energy Fuels Wyoming Inc Sheep Mountain Fremont, Wyoming 725 - Undeveloped Undeveloped Undeveloped Kennecott Uranium Company/Wyoming Coal Resource Company Sweetwater Uranium Project Sweetwater, Wyoming 3,000

283

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the US Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many NEPA documents being prepared by DOE contractors. No conclusions or recommendations are provided. This year's report is the eleventh revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the 12th revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA; SEPA and CERCLA documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is presented in environmental impact statements (EISs) and other Site-related NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological and historical resources, socioeconomic; occupational safety, and noise. Sources for extensive tabular data related to these topics are provided in the chapter. Most subjects are divided into a general description of the characteristics of the Hanford Site, followed by site-specific information, where available, of the 100,200,300, and other Areas. This division allows the reader to go directly to those sections of particular interest. When specific information on each of these separate areas is not complete or available, the general Hanford Site description should be used. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) is essentially a definitive NEPA Chapter 6.0, which describes applicable federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site. People preparing environmental assessments and EISs should also be cognizant of the document entitled ''Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements'' published by the DOE Office of NEPA Oversight. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) staff prepared individual sections of this document, with input from other Site contractors. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors. The following sections of the document were reviewed by the authors and updated with the best available information through June 1999: Climate and Meteorology; Ecology; Cultural, Archaeological, and Historical Resources; Socioeconomics; and All of Chapter 6.

Rohay, A.C.; Fosmire, C.J.; Neitzel, D.A.; Hoitink, D.J.; Harvey, D.W.; Antonio, E.J.; Wright, M.K.; Thorne, P.D.; Hendrickson, P.L.; Fowler, R.A.; Goodwin, S.M.; Poston, T.M.

1999-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

284

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents being prepared by DOE contractors. No conclusions or recommendations are provided. This year's report is the twelfth revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the thirteenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is typically presented in environmental impact statements (EISs) and other Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological, and historical resources, socioeconomic, occupational safety, and noise. Sources for extensive tabular data related to these topics are provided in the chapter. Most subjects are divided into a general description of the characteristics of the Hanford Site, followed by site-specific information, where available, of the 100, 200, 300, and other areas. This division allows the reader to go directly to those sections of particular interest. When specific information on each of these separate areas is not complete or available, the general Hanford Site description should be used. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to the NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities. Information in Chapter 6 of this document can be adapted and supplemented with specific information for a chapter covering statutory and regulatory requirements in an environment assessment or environmental impact statement.

Neitzel, Duane A. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Antonio, Ernest J. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Fosmire, Christian J. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Fowler, Richard A. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Glantz, Clifford S. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Goodwin, Shannon M. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Harvey, David W. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Hendrickson, Paul L. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Horton, Duane G. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Poston, Ted M. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Rohay, Alan C. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Thorne, Paul D. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)); Wright, Mona K. (BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB))

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 Welcome to the 53rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Many in the Department's NEPA Community were called on to give extraordinary time and resources to the preparation of key EISs issued recently and highlighted in this LLQR. We anticipate a busy 2008 as well. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Included in this issue: Multiple, Complex EISs Support DOE Missions; What Will the New Year Bring? Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in DOE NEPA Documents Is Evolving OMB and OSTP Issue Risk Analysis Principles Feature: Key EISs Yucca Mountain EISs Clean Coal EISs Western Energy Corridors Programmatic EIS FONSI Not a Foregone Conclusion CEQ's Collaboration Handbook

286

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2003 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2003 Welcome to the 37th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue we are starting a multi-part examination of lessons learned from Lessons Learned. We invite your suggestions on how to improve the Lessons Learned program. Thank you for your continuing support. Articles included in this issue: What's Next? CEQ Seeks More Input on Task Force Recommendations What Have We Learned from Lessons Learned? BLM Preparing Wind Energy Programmatic EIS DOE Submits Cooperating Agency Report EA Measures Protect Wetland EIS to Re-review Transmission Lines DOE Web Site Turns 10! DOE Promotes NEPA 101 Goals New E.O. Addresses Historic Heritage Meeting on Protection of Indian Sacred Sites Summer Detail at the NEPA Office

287

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2007 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2007 Welcome to the 51st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features collaboration as a key element of a successful NEPA process. Related articles discuss approaches to and benefits of collaboration and illustrate various applications. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Collaborating to Cultivate a Shared Vision Focus on Collaboration DOI Dialogues Bring Agencies Together Draft CEQ Collaboration Handbook MUSIC Uses Joint Fact Finding Environmental Justice Conference Environmental Conflict Resolution Training Nye County to Cooperate in Yucca SEIS Corps Works with Public for Hurricane Protection Public Input Sought on FutureGen Draft EIS Environmental Document Facilitates NEPA Reviews

288

Transmission/Permitting Atlas/State Data | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Transmission/Permitting Atlas/State Data Transmission/Permitting Atlas/State Data < Transmission‎ | Permitting Atlas Jump to: navigation, search PermittingAtlasHeader.png Roadmap Compare States General Transmission Dashboard Permitting Atlas Compare States Arizona California Colorado Idaho Montana Nevada New Mexico Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Resource Library NEPA Database State State Siting Act State Preemptive Authority Siting/Permitting Entities Permit Processing Timeframe Arizona None If TLSC finds compliance with local land use unreasonable or unfeasible, then the TLSC may grant a certificate Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC); Transmission Line Siting Committee (TLSC) 210-240 Days California Public Utilities Code Section 1001 Local jurisdictions are preempted from regulating electric power line projects California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) 18 months

289

NEPA Reading Room | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Reading Room | National Nuclear Security Administration Reading Room | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog NEPA Reading Room Home > About Us > Our Operations > NNSA Office of General Counsel > National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) > NEPA Reading Room NEPA Reading Room Welcome to the National Nuclear Security Administration's NEPA Reading

290

NEPA Lessons Learned, June 2004  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June 2004 June 2004 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Second Quarter FY 2004 June 1, 2004; Issue No. 39 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS The recent scoping meetings for the Yucca Mountain Rail Alignment Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), using an "open house" format rather than more formal presentations, provided valuable information to the Department regarding issues of concern to the public. More than 300 persons who participated in the scoping meetings had the opportunity to engage in one-on-one dialogue with DOE representatives, discussing concerns and receiving answers to their questions. Individuals were also able to provide oral comments to a court reporter for the record. "An open and collaborative planning process is essential

291

States with NEPA-like Environmental Planning Requirements | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal NEPA Contacts Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA REPORT TO CONGRESS ON COMPETITION IN WHOLESALE AND RETAIL MARKETS FOR ELECTRIC ENERGY...

292

40 Fed Reg 55978: CEQ NEPA Regulations, Final Rule | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Policy Act. 40 Fed Reg 55978: CEQ NEPA Regulations, Final Rule More Documents & Publications DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures: Final Rule (57 Fed Reg 15122)...

293

Property:NEPA FundingNumber | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA FundingNumber Property Type String This is a property of type String. Pages using the property "NEPA FundingNumber"...

294

Category:NEPA Environmental Analysis Types | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Environmental Analysis Types Jump to: navigation, search Category:NEPA Environmental Analysis Types Geothermalpower.jpg Looking for the NEPA Environmental Analysis Types page? For...

295

DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change and...

296

2013 General Counsel's Reminder Letter Regarding NEPA Planning...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

General Counsel's Reminder Letter Regarding NEPA Planning Summaries 2013 General Counsel's Reminder Letter Regarding NEPA Planning Summaries GC-1APSReminderLetter-2013.pdf More...

297

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents Return to Download Page The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index includes: NEPA Guidance and Requirements Documents Issued by Published A Brief Guide - DOE-wide Contracts For NEPA Documentation DOE 2003 A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA - Having Your Voice Heard CEQ 2007 A Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment DOE 2002 Actions During the NEPA Process - Interim Actions DOE 2003 Administrative Record Guidance DOJ 1991 Aligning the NEPA Process with EMS CEQ 2007 Alternative Actions For Analysis in Site-wide NEPA Reviews DOE 1992 Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance EPA 2012 Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands and NEPA

298

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2002, Issue No. 30, First Quarter FY 2002  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT First Quarter FY 2002 March 1, 2002; Issue No. 30 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS CEQ Guidance Encourages Agency Cooperation DOE Experience Is Generally Positive Better cooperation and coordination – always a good idea in the NEPA process – is given an extra boost by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in new guidance. James Connaughton, CEQ Chair, in a January 30, 2002, letter to Heads of Federal Agencies, underscores the benefits of enhanced cooperating agency involvement in the NEPA process. These benefits, including analytical and process efficiencies, improved trust among stakeholders, and greater likelihood of successful implementation of a proposed action, extend to both

299

DEPARTlVIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\1INATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lotl.Ol) lotl.Ol) u.s. DEPARTlVIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\1INATION REel PI ENT:Contra Costa Economic Partnership Page I of2 STATE: CA PROJECT TITLE: The Diablo Regional Distributed Solar Energy Generation Expedited Permit Process Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE·FQA-OOOOS49 DE·EEOOOS699 GFO-OOO5699-001 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EI S APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A11 Technical advice and assistance to organizations Tedmical advice and planning assistance to intemational , national, state, and local organizations.

300

.s. DI1PARTlvffim OF ENFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DI1PARTlvffim OF ENFRGY DI1PARTlvffim OF ENFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPU:NT: Missouri Corn Merchandising Council PROJECT TITLE: Missouri Ethanol Blend Infrastructure Project Page 1 of2 STATE: MO Funding Opportunity Announcement Number PrO(urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number GFO-10-356 0 Based on my review oflhe information conc:erniog fbI' proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authori7.ed under DOE Order4S1.IA), I bave made the following determination : ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.2 Modifications to 011, gas, and geothermal facility pump and piping configurations, manifolds. metering systems, and other instrumentation that would not change design process flow rates or affect permitted air emisSlOns

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lACAll) lACAll) u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPI[NT: SolarTech, An Initiative of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group Page 1 of2 STATE: CO PROJECT TITLE: Team Vanguard (Northern California) - Streamlining and Standardizing Permitting , Interconnection Funding Opportunity Announcement Nurnbtor Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number DE-FOA-ocx)549 DE-EEOOO5685 GF()..{)()()S68S.1 0 Based on my review ortbe informalion com::nning the propoud action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A11 Technical advice and assistance to organizations Technical advice and planning assistance to internatlonal, nauonal, state, and local orgamzatlons

302

Presidential Permits and Export Authorizations - Frequently Asked Questions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Permits and Export Permits and Export Authorizations - Frequently Asked Questions Presidential Permits and Export Authorizations - Frequently Asked Questions Presidential Permits Export Authorizations Self Certifications Annual Reports Presidential Permits What are they? Permits for the construction, connection, operation and/or maintenance of electric transmission lines that cross the U.S. international border. What are the criteria? Two primary criteria are used to determine if a proposed project is consistent with the public interest. 1. DOE considers the impact the proposed project would have on the operating reliability of the U.S. electric power supply. 2. DOE must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), which requires DOE to consider the environmental consequences

303

Special Topics in NEPA Documentation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Special Topics in NEPA Documentation Special Topics in NEPA Documentation Special Topics in NEPA Documentation Selected documents covering Special Topics under NEPA. February 18, 2010 DRAFT NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued this draft guidance memorandum for public consideration and comment on the ways in which Federal agencies can improve their consideration of the effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change in their evaluation of proposals for Federal actions under NEPA. July 10, 2002 Recommendations for Analyzing Accidents Under NEPA This DOE guidance clarifies and supplements "Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact

304

Integrating Pollution Prevention with NEPA Planning Activities  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: TO: October 15, 1992 EH-25 Integrating Pollution Prevention with NEPA Planning Activities NEPA Compliance Officers The purpose of this memorandum is to advise you of the direction that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) appear to be taking regarding pollution prevention and NEPA, and to encourage you to use the NEPA process to incorporate pollution prevention principles into the DOE planning and decisionmaking process. The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 affirms Congressional commitment to a new approach in improving environmental quality. The Act establishes as national policy the following hierarchy of actions for environmental protection: 1. prevent or reduce pollution at the source wherever

305

DOE NEPA Rulemaking | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE NEPA Rulemaking DOE NEPA Rulemaking DOE NEPA Rulemaking Revisions to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) regulations regarding implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) became effective on November 14, 2011. DOE has established 20 new categorical exclusions, most of which include criteria (e.g., acreage, location, and height limitations) that limit the covered actions. These categorical exclusions address actions such as stormwater runoff control, alternative fuel vehicle fueling stations and electric vehicle charging stations, and small-scale renewable energy projects. DOE also has revised many existing categorical exclusions and made other changes. Final Rule Notice of Final Rulemaking (76 FR 63763; October 13, 2011) Final rule, 10 CFR Part 1021, with changes tracked from the previous rule.

306

Active NEPA Projects | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Active NEPA Projects Active NEPA Projects Active NEPA Projects List of Active NEPA Projects EIS-0497: CE FLNG Project, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is preparing, with DOE as a cooperating agency, an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas terminal in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, and approximately 37 miles of 42-inch diameter natural gas transmission pipeline to connect the terminal to natural gas infrastructure facilities. Last Update: January 8, 2014 EIS-0495: Walla Walla Basin Spring Chinook Hatchery Program; Milton-Freewater, Oregon, and Dayton, Washington Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is preparing an EIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts of funding a proposal by the Confederated

307

"Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities: Environmental Assessments"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities: Environmental Assessments" Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities: Environmental Assessments" "NNSA NA-21" "January 2012" "#","*Title, Location","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (**NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" ,"U.S.-origin Spent Nuclear Fuel Returned to the United States from Austria in 2025",250000,"Determination Date:","February 2012","NA-21 seeks to analyze the impacts of U.S.-origin spent nuclear fuel returned to the United States from Austria in 2025 since current NEPA documentation for the U.S.-Origin Remove Program does not address this scenario." ,,,"Transmittal to State:","March 2012"

308

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA Review | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA Review Benefits of Site-wide NEPA Review Benefits of Site-wide NEPA Review The purpose of this guidance memorandum is to describe potential benefits of conducting a site-wide NEPA review (environmental impact statement or environmental assessment). I believe that this information will help program and field offices prepare their annual NEPA planning summaries and their overall NEPA compliance strategies. Site-wide reviews can aid the Department of Energy (DOE) in meeting its goals to streamline the NEPA process, to make that process more useful to decision makers and the public, and to reduce the time and cost required to prepare NEPA documents Benefits of Site-wide NEPA Review More Documents & Publications Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994)

309

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site for the many environmental documents being prepared by DOE contractors concerning the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). No statements regarding significance or environmental consequences are provided. This years report is the eighteen revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the nineteenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. Two chapters are included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6), numbered to correspond to chapters typically presented in environmental impact statements (EISs) and other Hanford Site NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology; air quality; geology; hydrology; ecology; cultural, archaeological, and historical resources; socioeconomics; noise; and occupational health and safety. Sources for extensive tabular data related to these topics are provided in the chapter. When possible, subjects are divided into a general description of the characteristics of the Hanford Site, followed by site-specific information, where available, for the 100, 200, 300 and other areas. This division allows the reader to go directly to those sections of particular interest. When specific information on each of these separate areas is not complete or available, the general Hanford Site description should be used. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities. Information in Chapter 6 can be adapted and supplemented with specific information covering statutory and regulatory requirements for use in an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. When preparing environmental assessments and EISs, authors should consult Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements published by the DOE Office of NEPA Oversight (DOE 2004). Additional direction and guidance on the preparation of DOE NEPA documents can be found at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/nepa/guidance.html. Individuals seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities may also use the information contained in this document to evaluate projected activities and their impacts. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) staff prepared individual sections of this document, with input from other Hanford Site contractors with the best available information through May 2007. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors. For this 2007 revision, the following sections of the document were reviewed by the authors and updated with the best available information through May 2005: Climate and Meteorology Air Quality Geology Seismicity section only Hydrology Flow charts for the Columbia and Yakima rivers only Ecology Threatened and Endangered Species subsection only Socioeconomics Occupational Safety All of Chapter 6.

Duncan, Joanne P.; Burk, Kenneth W.; Chamness, Mickie A.; Fowler, Richard A.; Fritz, Brad G.; Hendrickson, Paul L.; Kennedy, Ellen P.; Last, George V.; Poston, Ted M.; Sackschewsky, Michael R.; Scott, Michael J.; Snyder, Sandra F.; Sweeney, Mark D.; Thorne, Paul D.

2007-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

310

NEPA Lessons Learned March 2012 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 1 2 1 Frequent communication between senior program managers and NEPA staff, as well as close coordination among all involved DOE offices, enabled the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) to meet the challenge of completing an unprecedented number of NEPA reviews in recent years. From 2009 through 2011, EERE distributed approximately $16.8 billion from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

311

Hanford Site National Evnironmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This fourth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. In Chapter 4.0 are presented summations of up-to-date information about climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels. Chapter 5.0 describes models, including their principal assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclides transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable for environmental impact statements for the Hanford Site, following the structure Chapter 4.0. NO conclusions or recommendations are given in this report.

Cushing, C.E. (ed.) [ed.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

Hanford Site National Evnironmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

This fourth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. In Chapter 4.0 are presented summations of up-to-date information about climate and meteorology, geology and hydrology, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels. Chapter 5.0 describes models, including their principal assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclides transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable for environmental impact statements for the Hanford Site, following the structure Chapter 4.0. NO conclusions or recommendations are given in this report.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

Property:NEPA Proposed Action | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Proposed Action Proposed Action Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA Proposed Action Property Type Text Pages using the property "NEPA Proposed Action" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01 + NGP is proposing a geothermal development project which includes the construction and operation of power generation facilities, geothermal fluid production and injection well pads and wells, access roads, geothermal fluid pipelines, groundwater production wells, an electrical transmission line and switching station, and support facilities. NGP submitted an application (N-82701) and Plan of Development (PoD) to the BLM Winnemucca Field Office (WFO), for approval of a right-of-way (ROW) for those portions of the transmission line located on public lands managed by the BLM. SPPCo submitted an application (N-83479) to the BLM WFO for approval of a ROW for the electrical switching station to be built at the point of interconnection of the NGP transmission line with the existing SPPCo transmission line. An Operations Plan was submitted for approval to drill and test geothermal wells proposed on public land (within federal geothermal lease NVN-58196) which would be used for the project. A Utilization Plan was submitted for approval of utilization facilities proposed on public land to be used for the project. Geothermal Drilling Permits (GDPs) will be submitted for downhole casing and cementing engineering approval for each well as the project progresses.

314

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - List of Contents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

List of List of Contents DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - List of Contents Return to Download Page The NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index includes: A Brief Guide - DOE-wide Contracts For NEPA Documentation [DOE][2003] A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA - Having Your Voice Heard [CEQ][2007] A Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment [DOE][2002] Actions During the NEPA Process - Interim Actions [DOE][2003] Administrative Record Guidance [DOJ][1991] Aligning the NEPA Process with EMS [CEQ][2007] Alternative Actions For Analysis in Site-wide NEPA Reviews [DOE][1992] Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance [EPA][2012] Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands and NEPA [CEQ][1980] Analysis of Impacts to Workers in NEPA Documentation [DOE][1988]

315

DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures: Final Rule (61 Fed Reg 64603) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Implementing Procedures: Final Rule (61 Fed Reg 64603) NEPA Implementing Procedures: Final Rule (61 Fed Reg 64603) DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures: Final Rule (61 Fed Reg 64603) DOE amended its regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). These amendments incorporate changes primarily related to DOE's power marketing activities, based on DOE's experience in applying the current NEPA regulations. The revised regulations are intended to improve DOE's efficiency in implementing NEPA requirements by reducing costs and preparation time, while maintaining quality, consistent with the DOE Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA issued in June 1994. 61 Fed Reg 64603: DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures-Final Rule More Documents & Publications DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures: Final Rule (61 Fed Reg 36222)

316

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Table of Table of Contents DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents Return to Download Page The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index includes: NEPA Guidance and Requirements Documents Issued by Published A Brief Guide - DOE-wide Contracts For NEPA Documentation DOE 2003 A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA - Having Your Voice Heard CEQ 2007 A Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment DOE 2002 Actions During the NEPA Process - Interim Actions DOE 2003 Administrative Record Guidance DOJ 1991 Aligning the NEPA Process with EMS CEQ 2007 Alternative Actions For Analysis in Site-wide NEPA Reviews DOE 1992 Amended Environmental Impact Statement Filing System Guidance EPA 2012 Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands and NEPA

317

54th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

54th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 54th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 54th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 Welcome to the 54th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. As noted in articles on recently issued DOE EISs (Complex Transformation, Yucca Mountain Repository and Railroad, and Western Energy Corridors), DOE has received and is responding to extensive public comment. This issue also pays tribute to two women who have made extraordinary contributions to NEPA implementation. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articled included in this issue: Restructured Approach to FutureGen Yucca Mountain Final EISs on Track Highly Enriched Uranium Disposition Supplement Analysis DOE 2007 Cooperating Agency Report CEQ Citizen's Guide Enhances Public Involvement

318

Coalfleet IGCC Permits Database  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The CoalFleet IGCC Permits Database presents comprehensive information on permitting requirements and permit conditions for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants in an online database format. This Technical Update is a compilation of the Database contents as of April 1, 2009.

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

319

NEPA Yucca Mountain Downloads | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Yucca Mountain Downloads NEPA Yucca Mountain Downloads NEPA Yucca Mountain Downloads October 24, 2008 EIS-0250: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada October 10, 2008 EIS-0369: Floodplain Statement of Finding Rail Alignment for the Construction and Operation of a Railroad in Nevada to a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada October 10, 2008 EIS-0369: Record of Decision and Floodplain Statement of Findings Nevada Rail Alignment for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada June 2, 2008 EIS-0250-S2: Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

320

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

!, !, u.s. DEPARThIENT OFENI'RGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT :Advanced Magnet Lab, Inc. STATE : FL PROJECf TITLE: A Lightweight, Direct Drive, Fully Superconducting Generator for large Wind Turbines Page 1 of3 Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-0000439 DE-EEOOOS140 GFO-OOOS140-003 G05140 Based on my review of the information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under OOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination : ex. EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 83.6 Small-scale research and de ve lopment, labo ratory o perations, and pilot projects Siting. construction, modification, operation. and decommiSSioning of facilities for smaliscale research

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

NEPA-106 26feb13.pub  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

O O U N C I L O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L Q U A L I T Y E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E O F T H E P R E S I D E N T A N D A D V I S O R Y C O U N C I L O N H I S T O R I C P R E S E R V A T I O N NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 M A RC H 2 0 1 3 C O U N C I L O N E N V I R O N M E N T A L Q U A L I T Y E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E O F T H E P R E S I D E N T A N D A D V I S O R Y C O U N C I L O N H I S T O R I C P R E S E R V A T I O N NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 M A RC H 2 0 1 3 NEPA and NHPA │ 3 │ March 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 6 III. Relationship Between Section 106 and NEPA ...................................................................... 10

322

NEPA Lessons Learned December 2010 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 1 0 1 Fourth Quarter FY 2010 December 1, 2010; Issue No. 65 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A CEQ Issues Categorical Exclusion Guidance After coordinating with Federal agencies and addressing public comments, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued final guidance on Establishing, Applying,

323

Promoting NEPA Transparency and Public Engagement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Promoting NEPA Transparency and Public Engagement Promoting NEPA Transparency and Public Engagement Promoting NEPA Transparency and Public Engagement June 3, 2011 - 1:14pm Addthis "NEPA is, at its core, a transparency statute," said Katie Scharf, Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Deputy General Counsel, in opening a panel discussion on using information technology to support open government initiatives, engage the public, and add value to NEPA analysis. At the March 9, 2011, event - hosted by CEQ for Federal NEPA and legal staff - speakers promoted the benefits of enhancing transparency and offered practical implementation advice. Ms. Scharf asked the speakers to address why transparency is essential to the NEPA process and describe innovative approaches and achievements. NEPA's value, especially with regard to EISs, is based on transparency,

324

Integrating Pollution Prevention with NEPA Planning Activities | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Integrating Pollution Prevention with NEPA Planning Activities Integrating Pollution Prevention with NEPA Planning Activities Integrating Pollution Prevention with NEPA Planning Activities The purpose of this memorandum is to advise you of the direction that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) appear to be taking regarding pollution prevention and NEPA, and to encourage the use of the NEPA process to incorporate pollution prevention principles into the DOE planning and decisionmaking process. Integrating Pollution Prevention with NEPA Planning Activities More Documents & Publications Memorandum to Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies Regarding Pollution Prevention and the National Environmental Policy Act Guidance Regarding NEPA Regulations DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index - Table of Contents

325

Designating and Supporting NEPA Document Managers (November 24, 1998)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

UUI= UUI= f- 1;;2b.~ (08-93) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE:November 24, 1998 RA~~Y 6~ Office ofNEPA Policy and Assistance:Daniel:6-9760 SUBJECT: Designating and Supporting NEPA Document Managers TO: Secretarial Officersand Heads ofField Organizations The purpose of this memorandumis to emphasizeto you the important role your National EnvironmentalPolicy Act (NEPA) Document Managers play in the success of the Department's NEPA compliance program and to help you maximizetheir effectiveness. The NEPA Document Manager position was establishedto improve the management of the NEPA process by promoting team leadership and ownership at the staff level. The position was created four years ago through the SecretarialPolicy Statement on NEPA (June 1994), and now is incorporated in DOE Order 451.1A, NEPA ComplianceProgram. As you know, Secretarial

326

Using the NEPA Process to Further the Department's Mission and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Using the NEPA Process to Further the Department's Mission and Goals Using the NEPA Process to Further the Department's Mission and Goals This is a statement by DOE's Assistant...

327

Glossary of Terms Used in DOE NEPA Documents | Department of...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Glossary of Terms Used in DOE NEPA Documents Glossary of Terms Used in DOE NEPA Documents This Glossary is provided as a resource for preparing technical glossaries and related...

328

Property:NEPA EA EIS Report Url | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

EA EIS Report Url Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA EA EIS Report Url Property Type URL Description URLs to EAEIS Reports for NEPA Docs This is a property of type...

329

Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Home > Groups > Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 14 October, 2013 - 20:19 Categorical Exclusions CX Database EA EIS FONSI GEA GRC GRR NEPA On Tuesday, October 2, the Geothermal Technology Office and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory held a 1/2-day NEPA workshop. The workshop was held at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, in conjunction with the GEA/GRC Tradeshow and Conference. Three presentations were given, describing the NEPA database and associated analysis that had been conducted in 2013. 1. NEPA Database: The NEPA Database was developed on OpenEI as a way to assemble NEPA-related documents and meta-data in one location. As of this posting, there are 175 document sets in the collection, including

330

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Management System » National Environmental Management System » National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Regulations and Links DOE NEPA Website NEPA Compliance Program (DOE O 451.1B) Council on Environmental Quality Citizen's Guide to the NEPA Recent NEPA Actions and Determinations Categorically Excluded Actions Environmental Assessments (EA) Durango, Colorado, EA for Renewable Energy (June 2011) Rocky Flats, Colorado, EA for Surface Water Configuration (May 2011) Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic EIS (In Progress) Uranium Leasing Program Draft PEIS public comment period extended to May 31, 2013 Annual NEPA Planning Summaries 2013 2012 LM NEPA Compliance Officers (NCOs) Tracy Ribeiro, primary: (303) 410-4817

331

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2006 December 2006 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 Welcome to the 49th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we feature the initiation of three significant EISs: the Complex 2030 Supplemental Programmatic EIS, the Supplemental Yucca Mountain Repository EIS, and the expanded Yucca Mountain Rail EIS. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: NNSA Pursues Complex 2030 Vision Through Supplemental Programmatic EIS Scoping Process Underway for Two Yucca Mountain EISs Address Sabotage and Terrorism in EISs and EAs Special Environmental Analysis for Emergency Actions CEQ Work Groups Develop NEPA Guidance EIS Study Emphasizes Need for Quality and Clarity Transitions

332

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 Welcome to the 54th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. As noted in articles on recently issued DOE EISs (Complex Transformation, Yucca Mountain Repository and Railroad, and Western Energy Corridors), DOE has received and is responding to extensive public comment. This issue also pays tribute to two women who have made extraordinary contributions to NEPA implementation. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articles included in this issue: Programmatic EIS on Nuclear Weapons Complex Draws National Interest, Many Comments Restructured Approach to FutureGen Yucca Mountain Final EISs on Track Enriched Uranium Disposition Supplement Analysis DOE 2007 Cooperating Agency Report

333

Tools for NEPA compliance: Baseline reports and compliance guides  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Environmental baseline documents and NEPA compliance guides should be carried in every NEPA implementation ``tool kit``. These two indispensable tools can play a major role in avoiding repeated violations of NEPA requirements that have occurred over the past 26 years. This paper describes these tools, discusses their contents, and explains how they are used to prepare better NEPA documents more cost-effectively. Focus is on experience at Sandia Laboratories (NM).

Wolff, T.A. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Hansen, R.P. [Hansen Environmental Consultants, Englewood, CO (United States)

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

334

Using the NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index the NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Step 2: Entering a Search Term or Phrase 1. Locate the downloaded file, right click on it, select "Extract all", extract it to any location on your computer or USB drive. 2. Locate and Open the extracted folder "NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index". 3. Locate and Open the .PDX file titled "Search - NEPA Requirements and Guidance" to open search form.

335

Property:NEPA Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Property Property Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Property:NEPA Resources Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA Resources Property Type Page Description Resources that could be impacted by geothermal development and monitored by NEPA Subproperties This property has the following 10 subproperties: C CA-017-05-051 D DOE-EA-1116 DOE-EA-1621 D cont. DOE-EA-1733 DOE-EA-1849 DOI-BLM-CA-EA-2002-??? DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0051-EA D cont. DOI-BLM-NV-CO10-2011-0501-EA DOI-BLM-OR-P040-0021-EA DOI-BLM-OR-V040-2009-0059-EA Pages using the property "NEPA Resources" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Recreation + Recreation + BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Economic_Values + Economic Values +

336

Category:NEPA Doc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

source source History View New Pages Recent Changes All Special Pages Semantic Search/Querying Get Involved Help Apps Datasets Community Login | Sign Up Search Category Edit History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Category:NEPA Doc Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Category: NEPA Documents Collections Add.png Add a new NEPA Document Collection Pages in category "NEPA Doc" The following 178 pages are in this category, out of 178 total. B BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01 C CA-017-05-051 CA-067-2006-12 CA-170-02-15 CA-650-2005-086 CA-670-2010-107 CA-670-2010-CX CA-96062042 D DOE-EA-1116 DOE-EA-1621 DOE-EA-1676 DOE-EA-1733 DOE-EA-1759 DOE-EA-1849 DOE-EA-1961 DOE-EIS-0298 DOI-BLM-CA-C050-2009-0005-EA DOI-BLM-CA-EA-2002-??? DOI-BLM-CA-ES-2007-017-3200 DOI-BLM-CA-ES-2013-002+1793-EIS

337

NEPA Lessons Learned December 2011 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 1 1 The Department of Energy (DOE) has revised its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021) to better align them with current DOE missions and improve the efficiency and transparency of its environmental reviews. The revisions focus on the categorical exclusion provisions. Since DOE last revised its categorical exclusions 15 years

338

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide Volume 2 - Department of Energy NEPA Regulations and Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

memorandum memorandum u DATE: REPLY TO AllN OP: SUSJECT TO. August 16, 1994 Office ofNEPA Oversight: EH-25:Lichtman:500-401 O Environmental Assessment Checklkt Secretarial Officers and Heads of Field Offices This memorandum transmits a new Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Assessment Checklist, prepared by the OMCS of Environment, Safety and Health to assist DOE components in cartying outtheir responsibilities undertheNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). A draft of this checklist was distributed for review and comment at the NEPA Compliance Officers meeting in February 1994. Although there is no requirement to use this checklist, we belleve it is a useful tool in the preparation and review of DOE environmental assessments.Nevertheless, a checklist approach has certain inherent limitations, as discussed on page 1. Some NEPA practitioners may find this checklist has

339

Stormwater Permits (Vermont)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Stormwater permits are required for the construction of a new generation facility, the reconstruction or expansion of a facility, the operation of a generation facility which discharges stormwater...

340

Presidential Permits | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Assurance Cybersecurity Below is a listing of all the presidential permits grouped by Canada and Mexico. View the Presidental Permits - Mexico View the Presidential Permits -...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

U.S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJ ECT MANAG EM ENT CENTER NEPA DFTERlIfiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PROJ PROJ ECT MANAG EM ENT CENTER NEPA DFTERlIfiNATION Page 1 of2 RECIPIENT:Brigham City Corporation STATE: UT PROJECT TITLE: Brigham City Hydro Generatioo Project Funding Opportunity Annoum:ement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number COP DE·FG36-06G086093 GFO-G086093-002 G086093 Based on my review of the information eonccl"Ding tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4Sl.1A). I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 81 .8 Sc reened water . " . . . Intake and outflow Modifications to screened water Intake and outflow structures such thai .nlake velOCIties and volumes structures and water effluent quality and volumes are consistent with existing permit limits.

342

Secretarial Memorandum on Integrating Project Management with NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretarial Memorandum on Integrating Project Management with NEPA Secretarial Memorandum on Integrating Project Management with NEPA Compliance to Improve Decision Making Secretarial Memorandum on Integrating Project Management with NEPA Compliance to Improve Decision Making June 12, 2012 - 4:14pm Addthis Declaring that "Compliance with [NEPA] is a pre-requisite to successful implementation of DOE programs and projects," the Secretary has signed a memorandum on "Improved Decision Making through the Integration of Program and Project Management with National Environmental Policy Act Compliance." The memo urges better use of existing tools and guidance, and highlights principles for strengthening NEPA compliance - for example, through Field and Headquarters teamwork, realistic schedules, and performance

343

Quarterly oil report: Third quarter, 1987. [CA  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The volumes of petroleum fuels supplied to California in the fourth quarter of 1987 increased 1.6 percent from year ago levels. The increase is the result of increased unleaded gasoline and residual fuel oil use. Other fourth quarter results show that all product imports remained higher than year ago levels, but most were below the previous quarter except unleaded gasoline. Unleaded gasoline imports were higher, exports were reduced and stocks drawn down in the fourth quarter compared to the previous quarter to meet increased demand for unleaded fuel. Demand for low sulfur fuel oil increased toward the end of the quarter because natural gas sales to electric utilities were curtailed.

Not Available

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

DOE-Wide NEPA Contracting | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-Wide NEPA Contracting DOE-Wide NEPA Contracting DOE-Wide NEPA Contracting DOE has seven indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (task order) contracts for use by DOE Program and Field Offices nationwide, including the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.These contracts are for NEPA support services in preparing EISs and EAs, environmental reports and other documentation required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in its review of license applications, and other related environmental documents, such as floodplain and wetland assessments. The links above provide useful information to potential users of the DOE-wide NEPA contracts primarily DOE NEPA Compliance Officers, NEPA Document Managers, and Contracting Officers. The documents are public

345

Guidance on NEPA Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource NEPA Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Guidance on NEPA Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) This guidance results from the work of a Task Team formed by DOE's Environmental Management's NEPA Compliance Officer to study streamlining the NEPA process for RCRA corrective actions, in response to a recommendation in the National Academy of Sciences Report on "Improving the Environment: An Evaluation of DOE'S Environmental Management Program." Guidance on National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) More Documents & Publications Application of NEPA to CERCLA and RCRA Cleanup Actions

346

CEQ Issues Guidance on Improving NEPA Process Efficiency | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CEQ Issues Guidance on Improving NEPA Process Efficiency CEQ Issues Guidance on Improving NEPA Process Efficiency CEQ Issues Guidance on Improving NEPA Process Efficiency March 12, 2012 - 3:26pm Addthis The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has issued new guidance titled "Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely Environmental Reviews Under the National Environmental Policy Act" (NEPA Efficiency Guidance) that encourages federal agencies to "provide the best use of agency resources in ensuring a timely, effective, and efficient NEPA review." The NEPA Efficiency Guidance highlights existing provisions under the CEQ regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) that help meet this objective. These provisions are available for the preparation of EAs, as well as EISs, and the Guidance encourages their use

347

CEQ Issues Guidance on Improving NEPA Process Efficiency | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CEQ Issues Guidance on Improving NEPA Process Efficiency CEQ Issues Guidance on Improving NEPA Process Efficiency CEQ Issues Guidance on Improving NEPA Process Efficiency March 12, 2012 - 3:26pm Addthis The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has issued new guidance titled "Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely Environmental Reviews Under the National Environmental Policy Act" (NEPA Efficiency Guidance) that encourages federal agencies to "provide the best use of agency resources in ensuring a timely, effective, and efficient NEPA review." The NEPA Efficiency Guidance highlights existing provisions under the CEQ regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) that help meet this objective. These provisions are available for the preparation of EAs, as well as EISs, and the Guidance encourages their use

348

Guidance on NEPA Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Guidance on NEPA Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource Guidance on NEPA Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Guidance on NEPA Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) This guidance results from the work of a Task Team formed by DOE's Environmental Management's NEPA Compliance Officer to study streamlining the NEPA process for RCRA corrective actions, in response to a recommendation in the National Academy of Sciences Report on "Improving the Environment: An Evaluation of DOE'S Environmental Management Program." Guidance on National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review for Corrective Actions under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) More Documents & Publications Application of NEPA to CERCLA and RCRA Cleanup Actions

349

Property:NEPA Consultant | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Consultant Consultant Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA Consultant Property Type Page Pages using the property "NEPA Consultant" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01 + Environmental Management Associates + C CA-017-05-051 + Environmental Management Associates, Inc. + CA-067-2006-12 + Environmental Management Associates, Inc. + CA-170-02-15 + EMA Associates + CA-670-2010-107 + NA + CA-670-2010-CX + NA + CA-96062042 + MHA Environmental Consulting, Inc. + D DOE-EA-1621 + MHA Environmental Consulting + DOE-EA-1733 + RMT Inc + DOE-EIS-0298 + Environmental Management Associates, Inc. + DOI-BLM-CA-C050-2009-0005-EA + ICF International + DOI-BLM-CA-EA-2002-??? + MHA Environmental Consulting, Inc. +

350

WIPP Documents - National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Adoption of Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NM-P020-11-1414 Double Eagle Water System DOE/EA-1905 October 2011 This document examines the potential environmental impacts associated with providing DOE funding for the proposed improvements to the City of Carlsbad Double Eagle Water System Amendment to the Record of Decision for the Department of Energy's Waste Management Program: Treatment and Storage of Transuranic Waste This Federal Register Notice relates to DOE sending contact-handled and remote-handled transuranic waste from certain generator sites as needed to the Idaho National Laboratory to be treated and characterized prior to shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant for disposal. Environmental Assessment for Actinide Chemistry and Repository Science Laboratory

351

LM_NEPA-APS-2013.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FOR FOR FROM: SUBJECT: Deparment of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 29, 2013 GREGORY H. WOODS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNCIL, GC-1 n= DAVID S. SHAFER, Ph.D. C�d�KF= �= U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF SITE OPERATIONS -ACTING DIRECTOR Annual NEP A Planning Summary Attached is the Annual NEPA Planning Summary for the U.S. Department of Energy, Offce of

352

The Army Air Forces NEPA Project  

SciTech Connect

Included herein is a historical record of the AAF sponsored NEPA Project during the period of October 1945, to the present time, and covers in narrative form the nature of planning leading to the implementation of the project, the establishment of the operating group and its relationship to the Manhattan District (later to become the Atomic Energy Commission) and the approach to applicable technological problems bearing on both nuclear science and aeronautical propulsion engineering aspects.

Gasser, C.D.

1947-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

353

NNSA_KCFO_NEPA-APS-2013.pdf  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Kansas City- Field Ofice 2000 E. 95th Street Kansas City, Missouri 64131-3030 January 31, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR: GREGORY H. WOODS FROM: SUBJECT: {E �L o �= L. HOLECEK - ANAGER Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summary for 2013 In response to your memorandum of December 7, 2012, the following summary information is provided for all field locations in Missouri and New Mexico that are managed by the

354

2007 NEPA Survey 7.17.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Navy 1 0 Adverse dispositions: 95 NRC 0 1 TRO 2 DOI - BLM 7 8 Preliminary Injunction 10 - FWS 3 1 Permanent Injunction 18 - BuRec 3 0 Remand 23 - NPS 2 1 Dismissal w/ settlement 15 - BIA/NIGC 2 0 Dismissal w/o settlement 27 - MMS 2 0 Case pending, NEPA 168 - OSM 1 0 USDA - FS 40 23 - APHIS 1 4 DOC - NOAA 2 2 Army - COE 1 3 Gov't Agency Army 0 2 Jurisdictional - P prevailed 3 DOT - FHWA 4 0 Jurisdictional - D prevailed 12 - FTA 2 0 NEPA - Not required 10 - FAA 5 1 NEPA - Is required 4 DOE 1 0 CE - Adequate 7 EPA 2 1 CE - Not Adequate 6 HUD 0 0 EA - Adequate* 14 Air Force 0 1 EA - Not Adequate* 15 TVA 1 1 EIS - Adequate* 29 FCC 0 0 EIS - Not Adequate* 35 GSA 0 0 SEIS - Needed* 9 Ex-Im Bank (OPEC) 0 0 SEIS -Not Needed* 6 USPS 1 0 HHS-FDA 1 0 -NIH 0 0 VA 0 0 DHS - CBP 1 0 - CG 1

355

Property:NEPA FONSI | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

FONSI FONSI Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA FONSI Property Type Page Description FONSI files for NEPA Docs This is a property of type Page. Pages using the property "NEPA FONSI" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01 + BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310 EA DR and FONSI.pdf + C CA-170-02-15 + EA CA-170-02-15-FONSI-DR.pdf + CA-96062042 + FourmileHill ROD.pdf + D DOE-EA-1621 + EA-1621-FONSI-2008.pdf + DOE-EA-1676 + EA-1676-FONSI-2009.pdf + DOE-EA-1733 + EA-1733-FONSI-2010.pdf + DOE-EA-1759 + EA-1759-FONSI-2010.pdf + DOE-EA-1849 + DOE-EA-1849-FONSI.pdf + DOE-EIS-0298 + TelephoneFlat ROD.pdf + DOI-BLM-CA-C050-2009-0005-EA + Management Review of AltaRock Project Final FONSI.pdf +, AltaRock FONSI 2009 09 11.pdf +

356

Property:NEPA Decision | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Decision Decision Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA Decision Property Type Page Description Files documenting decisions on NEPA Docs This is a property of type Page. Pages using the property "NEPA Decision" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) B BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01 + BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310 EA DR and FONSI.pdf + D DOE-EA-1621 + CX-001816.pdf + DOE-EA-1733 + CX-002924.pdf + DOE-EA-1961 + Kalispell-Kerr EA Determination Memo.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2010-0006-EA + DOI-BLM-NV-W030-2010-0006-EA DECISION.pdf +, DOI-BLM-NV-W030-2010-0006-EA CONDITIONS.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2011-0001-EA + Coyote Canyon Decision Record March 2011.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2011-0514-EA + DOI-BLM-C010-2011-0514-EA-DR.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2011-0516-EA + DixieMeadows DecisionRecord 01 17 12.pdf +

357

3rd Quarter 2013 Domestic Uranium Production Report  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4. U.S. uranium in-situ-leach plants by owner, location, capacity, and operating status" 4. U.S. uranium in-situ-leach plants by owner, location, capacity, and operating status" "In-Situ-Leach Plant Owner","In-Situ-Leach Plant Name","County, State (existing and planned locations)","Production Capacity (pounds U3O8 per year)","Operating Status at End of" ,,,,2012,"1st Quarter 2013","2nd Quarter 2013","3rd Quarter 2013" "Cameco","Crow Butte Operation","Dawes, Nebraska",1000000,"Operating","Operating","Operating","Operating" "Hydro Resources, Inc.","Church Rock","McKinley, New Mexico",1000000,"Partially Permitted And Licensed","Partially Permitted And Licensed","Partially Permitted And Licensed","Partially Permitted And Licensed"

358

EIS-0359: Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance Approach EIS-0359: Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance Approach Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Facilities Project Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance Approach for the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Facilities Project (4/28/03). The purpose of this Notice is to inform the public of the change in the approach for the NEPA review for the DUF6 conversion projects for Paducah and Portsmouth, and to invite public comments on the revised approach. DOE/EIS-0359, Department of Energy, Notice of Change in National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Compliance Approach for the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DUF6) Conversion Facilities Project, 68 FR 22368 (April 2003)

359

Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents The purpose of this guidance is to assist EPA reviewers of NEPA documents in providing accurate, realistic, and consistent comments on the assessment of cumulative impacts. The guidance focuses on specific issues that are critical in EPA's review of NEPA documents under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. The guidance offers information on what issues to look for in the analysis, what practical considerations should be kept in mind when reviewing the analysis, and what should be said in EPA comments concerning the adequacy of the analysis. Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA Review of NEPA Documents More Documents & Publications

360

NEPA Implementation Procedures: Appendices I, II, and III | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Implementation Procedures: Appendices I, II, and III NEPA Implementation Procedures: Appendices I, II, and III NEPA Implementation Procedures: Appendices I, II, and III These appendices are intended to improve public participation and facilitate agency compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA Regulations, the last version appeared in the Federal Register of Friday, December 21,1984 (49 FR 49754). Note: The specfic contact information is outdated and should not be used for consultation or outreach. Appendix I - Federal and Federal-State Agency NEPA Contacts Appendix II - Federal and Federal- State Agencies With Jurisdiction by Law or Special Expertise on Environmental Quality Issues Appendix III - Federal and Federal-State Agency Offices for

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Glossary of Terms Used in DOE NEPA Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

N E P A GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN DOE NEPA DOCUMENTS September 1998 U.S. Department of Energy Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Glossary of Terms Used in DOE NEPA Documents SEPTEMBER 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE PREFACE Purpose of this Glossary This Glossary is provided as a resource for preparing technical glossaries and related explanatory material (such as text-box explanations of technical concepts) for DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents. Technical terms used in DOE NEPA documents should be defined to aid lay readers' understanding. Definitions may be provided either in the body of the document (recommended for terms that have different meanings technically than colloquially,

362

Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA DOE Offices are encouraged to be inclusive in providing potentially interested parties with opportunities to review NEPA documents. This Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA is primarily intended to supplement lists that Departmental Offices compile for individual projects or facilities. It complements the EIS Distribution Guidance. The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance updates this Directory annually in July and may issue revisions throughout the year as new information becomes available. NEPAStakeholdersDirectory_10_29_13.pdf More Documents & Publications Diversity Employment and Recruitment Sources

363

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide, Sandia National Laboratories  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains a comprehensive National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide for the Sandia National Laboratories. It is based on the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA regulations in 40 CFR Parts 1500 through 1508; the US Department of Energy (DOE) N-EPA implementing procedures in 10 CFR Part 102 1; DOE Order 5440.1E; the DOE ``Secretarial Policy Statement on the National Environmental Policy Act`` of June 1994- Sandia NEPA compliance procedures-, and other CEQ and DOE guidance. The Guide includes step-by-step procedures for preparation of Environmental Checklists/Action Descriptions Memoranda (ECL/ADMs), Environmental Assessments (EAs), and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs). It also includes sections on ``Dealing With NEPA Documentation Problems`` and ``Special N-EPA Compliance Issues.``

Hansen, R.P. [Hansen Environmental Consultants, Englewood, CO (United States)

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Recipient. aunty of Montgomery, MD ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific...

365

DOE Annual NEPA Planning Summary report templates 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

For GC use","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" "Solar Demonstration Project (DOEEA 1842)",,500000,"EA Determination Date:","application...

366

DOE-wide NEPA Contracts | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Center, on behalf of the Department, issued in late 2002 to provide support services for NEPA document preparation and related environmental tasks. Any Program or Field Office of...

367

DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures: Final Rule (57 Fed Reg 15122...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Act," to incorporate revised provision of DOE's Guidelines for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). 10CFR102104241992.pdf...

368

Need to Consider Intentional Destructive Acts in NEPA Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents, including environmental impact statements (EISs) and environmental assessments (EAs), should explicitly address potential environmental...

369

DOE Annual NEPA Planning Summary report templates 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pantex Site Office" "applicationvnd.ms-excel" "Title, Location, Document Number","Reserved For GC use","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" "No...

370

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EE RE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATIO...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT:Vermonl Sustainable Jobs Fund PROJECT T ITLE: Vermont Biofuels Initiative:Otter Creek Biofuels Page 1 of 2 STATE: VT Funding Opportunity...

371

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Governor's Office of Planning and Research, issued on March 5, 2013, a draft handbook on integrating NEPA and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review processes....

372

DOE Order 451.1B: NEPA Compliance Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The purpose of this Order is to establish DOE internal requirements and responsibilities for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality...

373

Microsoft Word - PR-10085844 NEPA.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5844 5844 Title: Replace BC 500 KVA Power Transformer Description: Subcontractor shall provide all labor, supervision, tools, equipment, and transportation required to procure, transport, install, test and pre-commission the new BC 500 KVA power transformer, SDTFW and new switch assembly. Work includes transportation of the transformer and switch assembly from the manufacturer's plant to BC; removal of existing equipment; unloading, assembly and installation of new equipment; and pre-commission testing. Subcontractor shall provide the lifting equipment required to remove the existing transformer and switch assembly, and to install the new equipment. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions)

374

Category:NEPA Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Resources Resources Jump to: navigation, search Category of resources that could be impacted by activities related to geothermal development. Pages in category "NEPA Resources" The following 39 pages are in this category, out of 39 total. A Access and Transportation Air Quality Areas of Critical Environmental Concern B BLM Sensitive Species C Candidate and Special Status Species Cultural Resources E Economic Values Environmental Justice F Fire Resources Fisheries Resources Floodplains G Geology and Minerals I Induced Seismicity Impact I cont. Intentional Destructive Acts Invasive, Nonnative Species L Lands and Realty Lands with Wilderness Characteristics M Migratory Birds N Native American Concerns Noise P Paleontological Resources Prime or Unique Farmlands Public Health and Safety

375

"Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities - Environmental Impact Statements"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities - Environmental Impact Statements" "Bonneville Power Administration Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities Environmental Impact Statements" "application/vnd.ms-excel" "#","*Title, Location","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (**NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" ,"I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project Cowlitz and Clark Counties, WA and Multnomah County, OR",5000000,"Determination Date:","application/vnd.ms-excel"," Construct about 70 miles of new 500-kV line between a new proposed substation near Castle Rock, WA and an exsting BPA substation in Troutdale, OR"

376

GRR/Section 12-FD-a - Migratory Bird Permit | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

a - Migratory Bird Permit a - Migratory Bird Permit < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 12-FD-a - Migratory Bird Permit 12FDAMigratoryBirdPermit.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Fish and Wildlife Service Regulations & Policies Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § 703 50 CFR 21 Migratory Bird Permits Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 12FDAMigratoryBirdPermit.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative Migratory birds should be addressed in every NEPA document that analyzes actions that may have the potential to adversely impact migratory bird

377

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dig d~ch from 24-51-5TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and reinstall electrical wire Dig d~ch from 24-51-5TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and reinstall electrical wire Date: 12120/2010 DOE Coda: Contractor Coda: Project Lead: Marcus Bruckner Project Overview 1 Dig ditch from 24-51-8TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and remove and replace electrical wire {N 2.7o') 1. Brief project desalptlon Pnclude anything that oould impact the 2. 24-51-5TX-10 and 24-AX-10 (SW r.tN 10TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH RANGE 78WEST) environment] 2. Leg allocation 3. 1 day 3. Duration of the project 4. Major equipment to be used 4. Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Leed and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and contact the Technical Assurance Department.

378

Transaction Costs and Tradable Permit Markets: The United  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We econometrically estimate the effect of transaction costs on the cost-effectiveness of the tradable permit market created during the US lead phasedown. We develop a methodology to identify transaction costs in the absence of price data. We find that refineries generally trade efficiently. We also, however, find evidence that transaction costs affect trading. We find evidence that refineries are less likely to trade in cases where theory suggests they will face high transaction costs. The data were collected from 30 major oil companies and include the trading partners and quantities traded for all permit trades carried out by each of 87 refineries over 8 quarters. 2 1

Suzi Kerr; David Mar

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

OpenEI Community - Coordinating Permit Office  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

http:en.openei.orgcommunitytaxonomyterm2550 en GRR 3rd Quarter - Stakeholder Update Meeting http:en.openei.orgcommunitybloggrr-3rd-quarter-stakeholder-update-meeting...

380

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index is a one-stop solution providing you with DOE's Guidance and Requirements documents combined into one file for easy download and use. The compressed (.zip) file contains all of these documents in their optimized and machine-readable format. The file also contains a "search index" that can be used to search for keywords and phrases in all the documents from one search form, without the need to install a separate program. Please direct any questions, comments, or feedback to: John.Jediny@hq.doe.gov Review the documents included in the Search Index as a List or Table NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index.zip

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures: Final Rule (61 Fed Reg 36222) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

61 Fed Reg 36222) 61 Fed Reg 36222) DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures: Final Rule (61 Fed Reg 36222) DOE amended its existing regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The amendments incorporate changes that improve DOE's efficiency in implementing NEPA requirements by reducing costs and preparation time while maintaining quality, consistent with the DOE Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA issued in June 1994. These amendments also incorporate changes necessary to conform to recent changes in DOE's missions, programs, and policies that have evolved in response to changing national priorities since the current regulations were issued in 1992. 61 Fed Reg 36222: DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures-Final Rule More Documents & Publications

382

The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups On March 31, 1994, officials from the Departrnent of Energy (DOE), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) met with then Acting Assistant Attorney General Lois Schiffer and other representatives of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to discuss the issue of the relationship of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to the cleanup of federal facilities under the CERCLA Superfund program. The meeting focused on proposals for addressing problems that have arisen from DOE's attempts to integrate the procedural and analytical approaches of NEPA into the CERCLA cleanup process. This document describes what was discussed at the meeting and the consensus reached there.

383

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | National Nuclear Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | National Nuclear Security Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Home > About Us > Our Operations > NNSA Office of General Counsel > National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Welcome to the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security

384

Energy Department Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency Energy Department Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency October 3, 2011 - 12:39pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy will save time and money in its environmental reviews of many proposed energy projects under revised regulations approved September 27, 2011, to implement the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The revisions focus on the Department's categorical exclusion provisions, and reflect the first update to these provisions in 15 years. A categorical exclusion applies to a class of actions that an agency has determined normally do not individually or cumulatively have a significant impact on the human environment. "Updating our NEPA rule allows us to accomplish our environmental reviews

385

Scoping Guidance: Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons, and  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Scoping Guidance: Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons, Scoping Guidance: Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons, and Participants in Scoping Scoping Guidance: Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons, and Participants in Scoping This Council on Environmental Quality scoping guidance document consists of advice on what works and what does not, based on the experience of many agencies and other participants in scoping. It is intended to make generally available the results of the Council's research, and to encourage the use of better techniques for ensuring public participation and efficiency in the scoping process. CEQ_Scoping_Guidance.pdf More Documents & Publications Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons and Participants in Scoping A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard

386

The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups On March 31, 1994, officials from the Departrnent of Energy (DOE), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) met with then Acting Assistant Attorney General Lois Schiffer and other representatives of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to discuss the issue of the relationship of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to the cleanup of federal facilities under the CERCLA Superfund program. The meeting focused on proposals for addressing problems that have arisen from DOE's attempts to integrate the procedural and analytical approaches of NEPA into the CERCLA cleanup process. This document describes what was discussed at the meeting and the consensus reached there.

387

DOE Advances Innovative CCS Polygeneration Plant Through NEPA Process |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Advances Innovative CCS Polygeneration Plant Through NEPA Advances Innovative CCS Polygeneration Plant Through NEPA Process DOE Advances Innovative CCS Polygeneration Plant Through NEPA Process July 9, 2012 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the California Energy Commission (CEC) are working together to advance an innovative carbon capture and storage (CCS) plant simultaneously through the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review and a complementary California Energy Quality Act process. As part of the NEPA process, DOE and CEC will hold a public meeting on July 12, 2012, at the Elk Hills Elementary School at 501 Kern St. in Tupman, Calif., at 5 p.m PDT. This will be an opportunity for the public to offer their comments and view the project site in Elk Hills, Kern County, Calif.

388

Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 ` Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Last Updated on January 11, 2013 Department/Agency Action Title/Citation Federal Register Notice(s) 2000 Department of Health and Human Services Revised NEPA Procedures Revised General Administration Manual, HHS Part 30, Environmental Protection Published for comment on January 11, 1999 (64 Federal Register [FR] 1655). Published as final procedures on February 25, 2000 (65 FR 10229). Bureau of Reclamation Department of the Interior Notice of Availability of a Draft Agency Handbook on the National Environmental Policy Act Department Manual (DM) Part 516, Chapter 6: Managing the NEPA Process (Appendix 7) Published on April 20, 2000 (65 FR 21210) with

389

DOE Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions DOE Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions September 30, 2011 - 2:30pm Addthis On September 27, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) approved revisions to its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations, and on September 28th, submitted the revisions to the Federal Register. The final regulations, which become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, are the culmination of a 2-year process to review and update DOE's NEPA implementing procedures. This process involved internal evaluation, public participation, and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) review. The revisions are designed to focus Departmental resources on projects with the potential for significant environmental impact, to better

390

Need to Consider International Destructive Acts in NEPA Documents  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8-89) 8-89) EFG (07-90) United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: December 1,2006 REPLY TO A T ~ N OF: Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (ECohen: 202-586-7684) SUBJECT: Need to Consider Intentional Destructive Acts in NEPA Documents TO: DOE NEPA Community (list attached) In light of two recent decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents, including environmental impact statements (EISs) and environmental assessments (EAs), should explicitly address potential environmental consequences of intentional destructive acts (i.e., acts of sabotage or terrorism). This interim guidance has been developed by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, in consultation with the Assistant General

391

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | National Nuclear Security Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Home > About Us > Our Operations > NNSA Office of General Counsel > National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Welcome to the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security

392

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index The DOE NEPA Guidance and Requirements - Search Index is a one-stop solution providing you with DOE's Guidance and Requirements documents combined into one file for easy download and use. The compressed (.zip) file contains all of these documents in their optimized and machine-readable format. The file also contains a "search index" that can be used to search for keywords and phrases in all the documents from one search form, without the need to install a separate program. Please direct any questions, comments, or feedback to: John.Jediny@hq.doe.gov Review the documents included in the Search Index as a List or Table NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index.zip

393

49 Fed Reg 49750: NEPA Implementation Procedures, Appendices I, II, and III  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

These appendices are intended to improve public participation and facilitate agency compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA...

394

https://www.eere-pmc.energy.gov/NEPA/Nepa_ef2a.aspx?Key=11188  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RECIPIENT:Louisiana -- Louisiana Tank STATE: LA PROJECT TITLE : Recovery Act -- State Energy Program Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-0000052 EE0000124 GFO-0000124-016 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and state

395

Microsoft InfoPath - nepa_19496.xml  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

67 67 Title: Replace Brine Disposal System Header to WH Brine Tanks Description: Subcontractor shall shall provide all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and supervision required to replace the existing brine disposal piping to the WH brine tanks with new cement lined piping and fittings, to be supplied by others as Government Furnished Equipment under WH-MM-767A. Regulatory Requirements: NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021) 10 CFR 1021.410 (Application of Categorical Exclusions) (a) The actions listed in Appendices A and B of Subpart D are classes of actions that DOE has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions). (b) To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, DOE shall determine the following:

396

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Guide Volume 1 - General NEPA References  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

QVTRM= Federal Register L= QVTRM= Federal Register L= Vol. QVI= No. 247 L= Friday, aecemer= 21, 198 f Rules and oegul~tions= COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENT AL QLl.'LITY QM=CFR Ch. V Na1ional Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementation Procedures; Appendices I, II, and Ill AGENCv: Council on Environmental Quality. Execulivp Office of the President. ACTION: Appendices to regulations. IUMMARV: These appendices are

397

NEPA scoping averts agency funds from blowing in the wind: A NEPA success story  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process has been successful without the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) The Agricultural Research Service (ARS) has used early application of the NEPA process to make an informed decision and thus avoid negative ecological and financial results. The NEPA process was initiated to assess the potential impacts of constructing and operating a 6--9 megawatt wind turbine farm. The farm was to consist of up to 18 turbines to be placed along the spine of Plum Island which lies in the Atlantic Ocean off the shore of eastern Long Island. The rationale for the proposal was to provide an alternative energy source and thus avoid the expenditure of more than one million dollars per year on electricity and the dependency on the mainland public utility companies. A sufficient wind resource is readily available on Plum Island. Complicating the issue was a window of opportunity to obtain federal production tax credits if the wind energy system could become operational before July 1, 1999.

Wade, M.C.; Van Dyke, J. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Crew, J. [Agricultural Research Service, Wyndmoore, PA (United States)

1998-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

398

Making NEPA more effective and economical for the new millennium  

SciTech Connect

This paper focuses on a ten-element strategy for streamlining the NEPA process in order to achieve the Act's objectives while easing the considerable burden on agencies, the public, and the judicial system. In other words, this paper proposes a strategy for making NEPA work better and cost less. How these ten elements are timed and implemented is critical to any successful streamlining. The strategy elements discussed in this paper, in no particular order of priority, are as follows: (1) integrate the NEPA process with other environmental compliance and review procedures; (2) accelerate the decision time for determining the appropriate level of NEPA documentation; (3) conduct early and thorough internal EIS (or EA) scoping before public scoping or other public participation begins; (4) organize and implement public scoping processes that are more participatory than confrontational; (5) maintain an up-to-date compendium of environmental baseline information; (6) prepare more comprehensive, broad-scope umbrella EISs that can be used effectively for tiering; (7) encourage preparation of annotated outlines with detailed guidance that serve as a road map for preparation of each EIS or EA; (8) decrease the length and complexity of highly technical portions of NEPA documents; (9) increase and systematize NEPA compliance outreach, training, and organizational support; and (10) work diligently to influence the preparation of better organized, shorter, and more readable NEPA documents.

HANSEN,ROGER P.; WOLFF,THEODORE A.

2000-03-08T23:59:59.000Z

399

Regulatory and Permitting Issues  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

As part of the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB), Terralog Technologies USA, Inc., reviewed current state and federal regulations related to carbon dioxide capture and storage within geologic formations and enhanced carbon uptake in terrestrial ecosystems. We have evaluated and summarized the current and possible future permitting requirements for the six states that comprise the West Coast Regional Partnership. Four options exist for CO{sub 2} injection into appropriate geologic formations, including storage in: (1) oil and gas reservoirs, (2) saline formations, (3) unmineable coal beds, and (4) salt caverns. Terrestrial CO{sub 2} sequestration involves improved carbon conservation management (e.g. reduction of deforestation), carbon substitution (e.g., substitution for fossil fuel-based products, energy conservation through urban forestry, biomass for energy generation), and improved carbon storage management (e.g., expanding the storage of carbon in forest ecosystems). The primary terrestrial options for the West Coast Region include: (1) reforestation of under-producing lands (including streamside forest restoration), (2) improved forest management, (3) forest protection and conservation, and (4) fuel treatments for the reduction of risk of uncharacteristically severe fires (potentially with associated biomass energy generation). The permits and/or contracts required for any land-use changes/disturbances and biomass energy generation that may occur as part of WESTCARB's activities have been summarized for each state.

Larry Myer

2005-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

Improving (NEPA) the National Environmental Policy Act through ISO 14001  

SciTech Connect

Federal application of ISO 14001 and / or the EPA Code of Environmental Management Principles (CEMP) could substantially improve the mitigation and monitoring aspects of the NEPA process. In addition, application of those management systems could also enhance fulfillment of Section 101 goals of NEPA. An ISO 14001 Environmental Management System would provide for a plan to continually address and improve environmental aspects and impacts. The strong feedback and improvement loops in both CEMP and ISO 14001 would help strengthen this weakness of NEPA by providing a mechanism to foster excellent environmental action, not just more dusty paperwork.

Wilkinson, C H

1999-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This guide is based on research and consultations undertaken by the Council on Environmental Quality concerning the need for a Citizens Guide to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Participants in NEPA Regional Roundtables held in 2003-2004 clearly voiced the need for an guide that provides an explanation of NEPA, how it is implemented, and how people outside the Federal government individual citizens, private sector applicants, members of organized groups, or representatives of Tribal, State, or local government agencies can better participate in the assessment of environmental impacts conducted by Federal agencies.

402

NEPA Success Stories: Celebrating 40 Years of Transparency and Open Government  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

NEPA Success Stories: Celebrating 40 Years of Transparency and Open Government, Environmental Law Institute, 2010.

403

Cooperating Agencies in Implementing the Procedural Requirements of NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

30, 2002 30, 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF FEDERAL AGENCIES FROM: JAMES CONNAUGHTON Chair SUBJECT: COOPERATING AGENCIES IN IMPLEMENTING THE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT The purpose of this Memorandum is to ensure that all Federal agencies are actively considering designation of Federal and non-federal cooperating agencies in the preparation of analyses and documentation required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and to ensure that Federal agencies actively participate as cooperating agencies in other agency's NEPA processes. 1 The CEQ regulations addressing cooperating agencies status (40 C.F.R. §§ 1501.6 & 1508.5) implement the NEPA mandate that Federal agencies responsible for preparing NEPA

404

Property:NEPA ApplicationAttachments | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

ApplicationAttachments ApplicationAttachments Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA ApplicationAttachments Property Type Page Description FONSI files for NEPA Docs. For example: Cover letters, Plan of Operations, Maps. This is a property of type Page. It links to pages that use the form NEPA_Doc. Pages using the property "NEPA ApplicationAttachments" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) D DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2009-0030-CX + 87401 - Proposed Action.pdf +, 87402 - Proposed Action.pdf +, 87400 - Proposed Action.pdf +, ... DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2010-0008-CX + 88211 - Proposed Action.pdf + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2011-0514-EA + Figure 1 Project Location 032111.pdf +, Figure 2 Project Boundary Leases and Land Status 032111.pdf +, Figure 3 Proposed Disturbance 060211.pdf +, ...

405

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

685 685 Recipier -ounty of Clark ., NV ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Comprehensive Building A9 This NEPA determination is limited to Energy audits and Energy All conducting audits/compiling the results of Conservation Measures B5.1 the audits/and making recommendations and the installation of an energy software system and real-time energy meters only. Building Energy Retro fits B2.5 Waste Stream Clause B5.1 Historic Preservation Clause Engineering clause *This NEPA determination is limited to retrofits and EE activities on existing buildings only. RE activities are prohibited pending further NEPA review. 2 30kw Solar power arrays at

406

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorically Excluded Actions |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA » National NEPA » National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorically Excluded Actions National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorically Excluded Actions Categorical Exclusions (CX) - Categorical exclusions are categories of actions that DOE has determined, by regulation, do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and for which neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is typically required. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1021, National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures, Appendices A and B to Subpart D, list DOE's categorical exclusions. Appendix A classes of actions are those actions considered to be general agency actions, such as awarding a contract or hiring personnel. Appendix B classes of actions

407

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

068 068 Re ent: City of Reno, NV ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Reno Interior Energy Efficiency Retrofits; Reno Exterior Energy Efficiency Retrofits; Reno Solar Onsite Renewable Energy; Reno Wind Onsite Renewable Energy 83.1, B5.1 Waste Stream, Historical Preservation, and Engineering Clauses Wind Turbines Only: Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity. Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activity without NEPA approval from DOE Design and Size of the wind turbines needs to be supplied to DOE for NEPA Analysis. Additional Comments: Design and Size of the wind turbines needs to be supplied to DOE for NEPA

408

Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons and Participants in Scoping  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons and Participants in Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons and Participants in Scoping Memorandum for General Counsels, NEPA Liaisons and Participants in Scoping As part of its continuing oversight of the implementation of the NEPA regulations, the Council on Environmental Quality has been investigating agency experience with scoping. This is the process by which the scope of the issues and alternatives to be examined in an EIS is determined. In a project led by Barbara Bramble of the General Counsel's staff the Council asked federal agencies to report their scoping experiences; Council staff held meetings and workshops in all regions of the country to discuss scoping practice; and a contract study was performed for the Council to investigate what techniques work best for various kinds of proposals.

409

NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews (Draft)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), incollaboration with the California Governors Office of Planning and Research, issued on March 5, 2013, a draft handbook on integrating NEPA and...

410

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Transfer and Procurement Energy Policy ARPA-E Laws & Legal Resources Open Government SmartGrid Information The mission of the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance is to assure...

411

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEIU...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEIU-IlNATION RECIPIENT:University of Hawaii Page 1 of2 STATE: HI PROJECf TITLE: Development of High Yield Tropical...

412

Using the NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Step 2: Entering a Search Term or Phrase 1. Locate the downloaded file, right click on it, select "Extract all", extract it to any...

413

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization Report, Revision 17  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many environmental documents being prepared by DOE contractors concerning the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). No statements about significance or environmental consequences are provided. This years report is the seventeenth revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the eighteenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is typically presented in environmental impact statements (EISs) and other Hanford Site NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology; air quality; geology; hydrology; ecology; cultural, archaeological, and historical resources; socioeconomics; noise; and occupational health and safety. Sources for extensive tabular data related to these topics are provided in the chapter. Most subjects are divided into a general description of the characteristics of the Hanford Site, followed by site-specific information, where available, of the 100, 200, 300, and other areas. This division allows the reader to go directly to those sections of particular interest. When specific information on each of these separate areas is not complete or available, the general Hanford Site description should be used. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to the NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities. Information in Chapter 6 of this document can be adapted and supplemented with specific information for a chapter covering statutory and regulatory requirements in an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. When preparing environmental assessments and EISs, authors should also be cognizant of the document titled Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements published by the DOE Office of NEPA Oversight (DOE 2004). Additional guidance on preparing DOE NEPA documents can be found at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/nepa/guidance.html. Any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities may also use the information contained in this document to evaluate projected activities and their impacts. For this 2005 revision, the following sections of the document were reviewed by the authors and updated with the best available information through May 2005: Climate and Meteorology Air Quality Geology Seismicity section only Hydrology Flow charts for the Columbia and Yakima rivers only Ecology Threatened and Endangered Species subsection only Socioeconomics Occupational Safety All of Chapter 6.

Neitzel, Duane A.; Bunn, Amoret L.; Cannon, Sandra D.; Duncan, Joanne P.; Fowler, Richard A.; Fritz, Brad G.; Harvey, David W.; Hendrickson, Paul L.; Hoitink, Dana J.; Horton, Duane G.; Last, George V.; Poston, Ted M.; Prendergast-Kennedy, Ellen L.; Reidel, Steve P.; Rohay, Alan C.; Sackschewsky, Michael R.; Scott, Michael J.; Thorne, Paul D.

2005-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

414

DOE NEPA Guidance on EIS Distribution (06/15/06)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS EIS DISTRIBUTION June 2006 U.S. Department of Energy Environment, Safety and Health Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance printed on recycled paper EIS DISTRIBUTION U.S. Department of Energy Environment, Safety and Health Offi ce of NEPA Policy and Compliance June 2006 Offi ce of Environment, Safety and Health Helping the fi eld succeed with safe and reliable operations. EIS Distribution Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................1

415

Presidential Permits - Procedures | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Permits - Procedures Presidential Permits - Procedures Electricity Advisory Committee Technology Development Electricity Policy Coordination and Implementation Transmission...

416

The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dcpart.meDlo[ Dcpart.meDlo[ J)JSticc :~ ~ - Emrironment~ndNatural Resources Division Auut4l,JI Antmlt';,l' GrlJrrol WttSlrills;lIm, 1.1- C 20530 January 23, '~,995 MEMORANDUM TO: Steven Herman, EPA 'Jean Nelson, EPA Scott'Fulton, EPA Geoffrey Garver, EPA Robert Nprdhaus, DOE Mary Arine SuI 1 i van, 'DOE E~len Livingston Behan, DOE Katie McGinty;. CEQ , Ray Clark, CEQ Elisabeth Blaug., CEQ .Sherri Wasserman Goodman, DDD Patricia Rivers, DDD FROM: ,{'0:' Lois J. Schiffer Assistant Attorney General EnvLrcmment & Natural Resources Division SU~~CT: Agreed to Repor~ of March 31, 1994 ~eeting Regarding The Applicationof NEPA t.o CERCLA CJ..eanu'ps On Ma~ch 31, 1994~ officiatsfromthe Departrnentof Energy ,(DOE). the Environmental Protection Age.ncy (EPA), and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) met with then Acting Assistant 'Attorney General Lois Schiffer and other representatives

417

The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dcpart.meDlo[ Dcpart.meDlo[ J)JSticc :~ ~ - Emrironment~ndNatural Resources Division Auut4l,JI Antmlt';,l' GrlJrrol WttSlrills;lIm, 1.1- C 20530 January 23, '~,995 MEMORANDUM TO: Steven Herman, EPA 'Jean Nelson, EPA Scott'Fulton, EPA Geoffrey Garver, EPA Robert Nprdhaus, DOE Mary Arine SuI 1 i van, 'DOE E~len Livingston Behan, DOE Katie McGinty;. CEQ , Ray Clark, CEQ Elisabeth Blaug., CEQ .Sherri Wasserman Goodman, DDD Patricia Rivers, DDD FROM: ,{'0:' Lois J. Schiffer Assistant Attorney General EnvLrcmment & Natural Resources Division SU~~CT: Agreed to Repor~ of March 31, 1994 ~eeting Regarding The Applicationof NEPA t.o CERCLA CJ..eanu'ps On Ma~ch 31, 1994~ officiatsfromthe Departrnentof Energy ,(DOE). the Environmental Protection Age.ncy (EPA), and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) met with then Acting Assistant 'Attorney General Lois Schiffer and other representatives

418

Quarterly Coal Distribution Report 1st Quarter 2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

1st Quarter 2012 June 2012 Quarterly Coal Distribution Report www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585

419

Quarterly Coal Distribution Report 3rd Quarter 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

3rd Quarter 2011 January 2012 Quarterly Coal Distribution Report www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585

420

Quarterly Coal Distribution Report 2nd Quarter 2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

October 2012 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov . U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 . Quarterly Coal Distribution Report 2nd Quarter 2012

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

2009 NEPA Lit Survey - In Progress - Master.xlsx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Judgment for defendant Judgment for defendant 76 ARMY-ELD 0 0 Dismissal w/o settlement 24 ARMY-USACE 5 4 Settlement 22 DHS 3 0 Adverse dispositions: 23 DOC 12 0 TRO 0 DOE 4 1 Preliminary Injunction 2 DOI-BIA 0 0 Permanent Injunction 15 DOI-BLM 2 2 Remand 6 DOI-BOR 3 1 Case pending, NEPA 271 DOI-FWS 0 0 DOI-MMS 0 0 DOI-NPS 0 0 DOI-OSM 0 0 DOI-SOL 0 0 DOS-L/OES 0 0 Jurisdictional - P prevailed 0 DOT-FAA 1 0 Jurisdictional - D prevailed 20 DOT-FHWA 12 2 NEPA - Not required 2 DOT-FTA 1 0 NEPA - Is required 2 DOT-MA 0 0 CE - Adequate 5 EPA 1 0 CE - Not Adequate 0 FCC 0 0 EA - Adequate* 23 FERC 2 0 EA - Not Adequate* 5 GSA 0 0 EIS - Adequate* 21 HHS/NIH 0 0 EIS - Not Adequate* 20 HUD 0 0 SEIS - Needed* 3 NAVY 1 0 SEIS -Not Needed* 3 NRC 4 0 TVA 0 1 USAF 1 0 USDA 43 12 VA 2 0 Total 97 23 2009 NEPA Case Dispositions NEPA Cases in 2009 Basis for NEPA Dispositions * More detailed info in tables below

422

Individual Permit for Storm Water  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Individual Permit Individual Permit Individual Permit for Storm Water The Individual Permit authorizes the discharge of storm water associated with historical industrial activities at LANL from specified solid waste management units and areas of concern, collectively referred to as Sites. October 15, 2012 Sandia Canyon Wetlands Sandia Canyon Wetlands in the early morning looking north. Get Expertise Environmental Communications & Public Involvement Email In the Individual Permit, to 'minimize' means to reduce and/or eliminate discharges of pollutants in storm water to the extent achievable. What is the Individual Permit for Storm Water? The Permit - NPDES No. NM0030759 - was issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, on September 30, 2010 to Los Alamos National

423

Microsoft Word - Groundwater Discharge Permit  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

State Renews Groundwater Discharge Permit for WIPP CARLSBAD, N.M., September 11, 2008 - The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) has renewed the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) groundwater discharge permit until 2013. The permit regulates the discharge of water from WIPP facilities and operations to lined ponds, which protect groundwater resources. The permit allows WIPP to discharge domestic wastewater, non-hazardous wastewater and storm water into 13 on-site, synthetically-lined ponds. The new permit also provides for increased daily discharge volumes to allow more flexibility in plant operations. "This permit is the result of a positive year-long effort with the New Mexico Groundwater Quality Bureau," said Jody Plum, DOE Carlsbad Field Office Permitting and

424

Quarterly Coal Report  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

December 2010 DOEEIA-0121 (201003Q) Revised: July 2012 Quarterly Coal Report July - September 2010 December 2010 U.S. Energy Information Administration Office of Oil, Gas, and...

425

AAI Quarterly Meeting Minutes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

AAI Quarterly Meeting Minutes August 1, 2007 AAI Updates - Rod Gerig USPAS Schools * USPAS 2008 Winter School - University of California, Santa Cruz January 14-25, 2008 * USPAS...

426

Air Pollution Control Permit to Construct and Permit to Operate...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

may be required prior to commencing construction of the facility. Fuel-burning boilers, coal, oil, or natural gas-fired boiler steam generators require a permit. Gas...

427

(Great Plains Coal Gasification project): Quarterly environmental, safety, medical, and industrial hygiene report, fourth quarter 1986  

SciTech Connect

Contents of this quarterly report include: (1) environmental monitoring program; (2) supplemental environmental program; (3) quality assurance/quality control activities; (4) schedule of activities for next reporting period; (5) safety; (6) medical services; and (7) industrial hygiene. The environmental monitoring program covers: permitting activities; ambient monitoring; plant discharge monitoring; pollution control unit emissions; surface mining and reclamation; environmental incident summary; and regulatory environmental inspections. Supplemental environmental program includes: performance survey; toxicity screening study; data base management system; epidemiology; and contingency program.

Not Available

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

Great Plains Coal Gasification Project. Quarterly environmental report, second quarter, 1986  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Following the executive summary, this quarterly report includes environmental monitoring program, supplemental environmental program, and quality assurance/quality control activities. Under the environmental monitoring program, the following topics are covered: permiting activities; ambient monitoring; plant discharge monitoring; pollution control unit emissions; surface mining and reclamation; environmental incident summary; and regulatory environmental inspections. The supplemental environmental program includes: performance survey; toxicity screening study; data base management system; epidemiology; and contingency program. (AT)

Not Available

1986-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

(Great Plains coal gasification project): Quarterly environmental report, Third quarter 1986  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Environmental monitoring, supplemental environmental programs and quality assurance/quality control activities are presented in this quarterly report. Under the environmental monitoring program, the following topics are covered: permitting activities; ambient monitoring; plant discharge monitoring; pollution control unit emissions; surface mining and reclamation; environmental incident summary; and regulatory environmental inspections. The supplemental environmental program covers: performance survey; toxicity screening study; data base management system; epidemiology; and contingency program. 16 figs., 53 tabs. (AT)

Not Available

1986-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

Federal Technical Capability Program - Quarterly Performance Indicator  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports Quarterly Performance Indicator Reports 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 16, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability June 5, 2013 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 20, 2013 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 20, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 8, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 30, 2012 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability March 6, 2012 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability November 10, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability August 24, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability May 18, 2011 Quarterly Report on Federal Technical Capability February 23, 2011

431

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Categorical Exclusion Determination Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OK-TRIBE-WYANDOTTE NATION OF OKLAHOMA OK-TRIBE-WYANDOTTE NATION OF OKLAHOMA Location: Tribe OK-TRIBE- WYANDOTTE NATION OF OKLAHOMA OK American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Proposed Action or Project Description: The Wyandotte Nation of Oklahoma proposes to 1) conduct energy audits of several identified tribal buildings and tribal residences (NEPA approved by Jane Summerson on 9/29/2009) and 2) retrofit lighting fixtures at the Artie Nesvold Community Center (built 1986) and the Tribal Administration Building (built 1978). Conditions: None Categorical Exclusion(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.1 *-For the complete DOE National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding categorical exclusions, see Subpart D of 10 CFR10 21 This action would not: threaten a violation of applicable statutory, regulatory, or permit requirements for environment, safety, and health,

432

OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY NEPA Annual Planning Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENERGY RELIABILITY NEPA Annual Planning Summary 2012 Environmental Impact Statements Energia Sierra Juarez (DOE/EIS-0414)- Energia Sierra Juarez (ESJ) (formerly Baja Wind) applied to OE for a Presidential permit to construct a 1250 MW electric transmission line across the U.S.-Mexico border. The proposed transmission line would originate inside Mexico at the proposed La Rumorosa Wind Generation Facility. The line would continue north approximately two miles to the U. S.-Mexico border, and one additional mile inside the U.S. to a new substation to be constructed on the existing Southwest Powerlink. The proposed transmission line would be used to transmit renewable energy into the California electricity market. The County of San Diego is a cooperating agency. DEIS NOA (75 FR 57018) issued in September 2010, public

433

GRR/Section 9-FD-f - DOD NEPA Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 9-FD-f - DOD NEPA Process GRR/Section 9-FD-f - DOD NEPA Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-FD-f - DOD NEPA Process 09-FD-f - DOD NEPA Process (2).pdf Click to View Fullscreen Regulations & Policies 32 CFR 651 32 CFR 989 32 CFR 775 Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 09-FD-f - DOD NEPA Process (2).pdf 09-FD-f - DOD NEPA Process (2).pdf 09-FD-f - DOD NEPA Process (2).pdf 09-FD-f - DOD NEPA Process (2).pdf Flowchart Narrative The National Environmental Policy Act of 1970 (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to consider the potential environmental consequences of their proposed action, and any reasonable alternatives, before deciding whether and in what form to take an action. The Council on Environmental Quality

434

Water Use Permitting (Wisconsin) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Permitting (Wisconsin) Water Use Permitting (Wisconsin) Eligibility Utility Program Information Start Date 2011 Wisconsin Program Type Siting and Permitting Withdrawers in the...

435

Application of NEPA requirements to CERCLA remedial actions. Master's thesis  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This study investigated the application of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements to Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) actions. Similarities in the documentation and public participation requirements of NEPA and CERCLA include identification and evaluation of alternatives and public participation. Differences include document contents and timing of public participation. This study presented four options for ensuring NEPA compliance at CERCLA sites. Option one included a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) with subsequent combined FS/EIS report for each subunit. Option two eliminated the PEIS, but retained a stand-alone NEPA document for each CERCLA subunit. Option three included a PEIS with a subsequent combined FS/EIS report for each subunit. Option four eliminated the PEIS but retained a combined FS/EIS report for each subunit. The model presented in this study can be used at any installation to determine the optimal approach for the site. The model's goal is to comply with NEPA and CERCLA while maintaining a balance between cost, schedule, and public acceptance.

Strobbe, C.L.

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

EIA -Quarterly Coal Distribution  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Coal Distribution Coal Distribution Home > Coal> Quarterly Coal Distribution Back Issues Quarterly Coal Distribution Archives Release Date: June 27, 2013 Next Release Date: September 2013 The Quarterly Coal Distribution Report (QCDR) provides detailed quarterly data on U.S. domestic coal distribution by coal origin, coal destination, mode of transportation and consuming sector. All data are preliminary and superseded by the final Coal Distribution - Annual Report. Year/Quarters By origin State By destination State Report Data File Report Data File 2009 January-March pdf xls pdf xls April-June pdf xls pdf xls July-September pdf xls pdf October-December pdf xls pdf 2010 January-March pdf xls pdf xls April-June pdf xls pdf xls July-September pdf xls pdf xls

437

e-NEPA Electronic Submittal of Environmental Impact Statements to EPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

e-NEPA e-NEPA Electronic Submittal of Environmental Impact Statements to EPA About e-NEPA e-NEPA is EPA's tool for submitting EIS documents electronically. The system meets EPA's requirements for EIS filing, and eliminates the need to mail hard copies of EISs to EPA. As before, to have your agency's EIS appear in EPA's Federal Register Notice of Availability, submit by 5:00 pm Eastern Standard Time on the prior Friday. Please note that using e-NEPA for filing does not affect agencies' responsibilities for public distribution of EISs. Additionally, e-NEPA registration is only open to government employees:

438

Open Burning Permit Events Management  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Open Burning Permit Events Management Form Revision Date: 09/29/2010 OpenBurningPermit.docx A Use being burned: (check all that apply) [ ] Small logs (less than 16 in. long) [ ] Finished Lumber________________________________ As the individual responsible for this event, I have read the attached Regulations for Open Burning. The sponsoring

Manning, Sturt

439

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAG EMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MANAG EMENT CENTER MANAG EMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT:City of Philadelphia PROJECT TITLE: Ambler Boiler House Geothermal Wells, Cool Roof and PV installation Page 1 of3 STATE: PA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-OOOO148 DE-EE-0003568 GFO-OOO3568-001 0 Based on my review urthe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA). I have made the follm~'ing determination: ex. EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conse rve energy or water (a) ActIons to conserve energy or water, demonstrate potential energy or water conservation, and promote energy efficiency that would not have the potential to cause significant changes in the indoor or outdoor concentrations of potentially harmful

440

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETFRMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETFRMINATION PROJECf TITLE; City of Mesa Reclamation Blower Units STATE: AZ Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elO Number DE-EE0000840 GFO-o000840-OO2 0 Based on my review of the information concerning ahe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4SI.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 8 5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the Indoor concentratIOns of potentially harmful substances. These actions may Involve financial and technical assistance to IndiViduals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and slate

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Us » Contact Us » Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance Us » Contact Us » Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance Contacts for NEPA Policy and Compliance Carol Borgstrom, Director 202-586-4600 carol.borgstrom@hq.doe.gov Lettie Wormley, Secretary 202-586-4610 lettie.wormley@hq.doe.gov Eric Cohen, Supervisory Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-7684 eric.cohen@hq.doe.gov Brian Costner, Supervisory Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-9924 brian.costner@hq.doe.gov James (Jim) Daniel, Supervisory Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-9760 daniel.james@hq.doe.gov Ralph Barr, Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-3448 ralph.barr@hq.doe.gov Vivian Bowie, Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-1771 vivian.bowie@hq.doe.gov Connie Chen, Environmental Protection Specialist 202-586-0733 connie.chen@hq.doe.gov

442

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENTCENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MANAGEMENTCENTER MANAGEMENTCENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT :T he GJosten Associates PROJECf TITLE: Offshore Wind Technology Development Page 1 of2 STATE: WA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA.Q000415 DE-EEOOO5490 GF().O(}()5490-001 0 Based on my review ofthe information concel"ning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45I.1A), I have made the (ollo,,"lng determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and audits). data analysis (indudlng, but not limited to, computer modeling), document preparation (including, but not limited to, conceptual design,

443

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Recipient: County of Clark ) 114.4- ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) County property biomass A9, All This NEPA determination is limited to conducting audits, studies, outreach and education only. Solar installation B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause Recycle cart promotion program A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause should be applied to replacement of old bins. Residential and commercial conservation A9, All This NEPA determination is limited to conducting audits, studies, outreach and education only. LED replacement for Traffic Signals B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Smart Powerstrips

444

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY Carol Borgstrom, Director 202-586-4600 Carol.Borgstrom@hq.doe.gov Lettie Wormley, Secretary 202-586-4610 Lettie.Wormley@hq.doe.gov Eastern Energy and Waste Management Unit Contact Program/Responsibility Special Projects or Topics Brian Costner Brian.Costner@hq.doe.gov 202-586-9924 Unit Leader Yardena Mansoor Yardena.Mansoor@hq.doe.gov 202-586-9326 Office of Environmental Management * Oak Ridge Office * Savannah River Operations Office Office of Fossil Energy * Strategic Reserves * Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability * Champlain Hudson Power Express Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration

445

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Recipient. _aunty of Montgomery, MD ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Home Energy Loan Program Fully Conditioned This activity is not ready for NEPA review. The loan program is still under development by the recipient and should be reviewed when the details of the program have been finalized by the recipient. Energy Conservation & Renewable Energy in County Buildings A9 This CX applies to Energy Scoping Studies, Measurement and Verification and Program Administration tasks only. All ECM/REM Funding and Buy-Down tasks are subject to further NEPA review when specific tasks have been determined by the recipient.

446

T OF ENERGY EER E PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

.. .. tl.Oll u.s. DEPARTUEN T OF ENERGY EER E PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT:Cook County PROJECT TITLE : EECBG- 5. Cook County Oeconstruction Program Page 1 of2 STATE: IL Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Proturement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Numbu DE-EEOOOO816 0 Based on my review oftbe infonnation concerning the propoHd action, as NEPA Complian« Offif:er (authoriztd uDdu DOE Orner 451.1A).1 bave made the follOwing determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including , but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply

447

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

s, s, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERM INATION RECIPIENT:University of Central Florida PROJECf TITLE : Florida Hydrogen Initiative· 3 letter of Interest (LOI) Projects Page I of2 STATE: Fl Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number COP Renewal DE·FC36-04G014225 GF0-04-221e G014225 Based on my review orlbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.IA), I have made the (ollowing determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B 3.6 Siting. construction (or modification). operation, and decommissioning of facilities for indoor bench-scale research projects and conventional laboratory operations (for example, preparation of chemical standards and sample analysis):

448

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorical Exclusions (CX)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NEPA NEPA National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations CX Posting No. Project Title Posted DOE-ID-13-085 Organic Speciation and Interactions in ALSEP - One Step Partitioning Process of Minor Actinides, Lanthanides, and Fission Products - Oregon State University - 15 Kb 12/12/13 DOE-ID-13-084 Enhancement of the Extraction of Uranium from Seawater - University of Maryland - 13 Kb 12/11/13 DOE-ID-13-082 Long-Term Prediction of Emissivity of Structural Material for High Temperature Reactor Systems - University of Missouri - 13 Kb 12/10/13 DOE-ID-13-081 Innovative Elution Processes for Recovering Uranium and Transition Metals from Amidoximebased Sorbents - University of Idaho - 14 Kb 12/06/13 DOE-ID-13-080 Glass Composition and Solution Effects on Stage III Dissolution - Pennsylvania State University - 12 Kb 12/06/13

449

US. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

""'!' ""'!' US. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT:Office of the Govemor, Nevada Siale Office of Energy PROJECT TITLE: Program Year 2012 Formula Grants - Slate Energy Program Page 1 of2 STATE: NV Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE·FOA..()()()()643 OE·EE'()()()3761 GF0-0003761-OO1 Based on my review of tbe information concerning tbe proposed action, .s NEPA Compliance Offien (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the (ollowing determination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A11 Technical advice and assistance to organizations A9 Info rm ati on gathe ring, analysis, and dissemination Ralional for detennination:

450

EERE PROJECT MAN AGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETFIU.TINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RTl\IENT OF ENERGY RTl\IENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MAN AGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETFIU.TINATION Page 1 of2 RECIPIENT:CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection STATE: CT PROJECf TITLE: CONNECTICUT SEP ANNUAL PY12 Funding Opportunity Announcement Number PrCK':urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA.Q000643 DE-EEOOO5301 GF0-0005301-OO 1 Based on my review of the informlltioD concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A),1 have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: De~ription : All Technical advice and assistance to org an izations AS InformaUo n gat herin g, analysis, and dissemi nation Rational for determination: Technical advice and planning assistance to Intemational, national

451

EE RE PROJECT MANAG EMENT CENTER NEPA DETERr-IINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

>,RTr-lENT OF ENERGY >,RTr-lENT OF ENERGY EE RE PROJECT MANAG EMENT CENTER NEPA DETERr-IINATION Page 1 of2 RECIPIENT:North Carolina Department of Commerce. State Energy Office STATI<:: NC PROJECT TITLE: Energy Conservation Programs in Transportation - Sandhills Community Coliege Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number DE-EEOOOO771 NEPA Control Number GFO-OOOO771-014 em Number o Based on my review or the infonnation concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (autboriud under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

452

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETTIUlIIN .... TION PROJECT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chicago Chicago u.s. DEP .... RTIIIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETTIUlIIN .... TION PROJECT TITLE: Chicago Climate Action Plan Advanced Transportation Technologies Initiative STATE: IL Funding Opportunity Announcement Number nla Procurement Instrument Number DE-FG3&-060860S2 NEPA Control Number GFO-G086052-001 Page 1 of2 ClD Number G086052 Based on my review oftbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.1A), I bave made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 65.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

453

DEPARTMENT OFENFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEIU.UNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFENFRGY OFENFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEIU.UNATION RECIPIENT:$tate of Oklahoma PROJECT TITLE : gridSMART * Public Service Company of Oklahoma Page 1 of2 STATE: OK Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-OOOOOS2 EEOOOO133 GF0-0000133-047 EE133 Based on my review of tbe information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45I.lA}.1 have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 8 5.1 Actions to oonserve energy, demonstrate potential energy oonservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

454

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

.eU) , .eU) , u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT: Parker Hannifin, Aircraft Wheel and Brake Diy PROJECT TITl.E: Wind Turbine Electric Brake project Page 1 of2 STATE: OH Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pro<:urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number COP DE-EEOOOO296 GF0-10-053 0 Based on my review orthe information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer- (autboriztd under DOE Order 4SI.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B3.6 Siting. construction (or modification). operation . and decommissioning of facilities for indoor bench-scale research projects and conventional laboratory operations (for example. preparation of chemical standards and sample analysis):

455

DEPARTM ENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

u.s. u.s. DEPARTM ENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION Page 1 of2 STATE: PA PROJECf TITLE : Lehigh County (PA), Geothermal al Trexler Enviromenlal Center -ARRA-EECBG Funding Opportunity AnnOUReement Number DE-FOA-OOOO13 Procurement Instrument Number DE-EEOOOO9361EECBG NEPA Control Number elD Number o Based on my .-eyiew or lbe infor mation concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination : ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actIOns may involve financial and technical

456

NEPA Reports and Records of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Reports and Records of Decision NEPA Reports and Records of Decision NEPA Reports and Records of Decision Report of the Review of the Hanford Solid Waste Environmental Impact Statement regarding Data Quality Control and Management Issues - As part of the litigation involving receipt of offsite waste and the HSW EIS, the Court allowed the State of Washington a limited amount of discovery pertaining to iodine-129, technetium-99, and groundwater analyses. While compiling information to respond to the State discovery request, Battelle discovered three data quality issues within the data sets used for the cumulative groundwater impact analysis: As a result of these data quality issues, a team was commissioned to review the HSW EIS for additional data quality issues as well as any programmatic problems which might have

457

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Recipien, ..ounty of Westmoreland, PA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Energy Efficiency & Conservation Programs for Buildings & Facilities All County Building Energy Audits A9 Energy Efficiency Retrofits B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historical Preservation clauses. Energy Efficiency & Conservation Strategy A9, All, B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity Prohibited: Any implantation of projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE Renewable Energy Technologies on Government Buildings B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits

458

Chicago Office NEPA Tracking Number U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SFCH F 560-ACQ SFCH F 560-ACQ (11/05) Previous editions are obsolete. ~1,6~.. --1 b Chicago Office NEPA Tracking Number U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF SCIENCE -- CHICAGO OFFICE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NOTIFICATION FORM To be completed by "financial assistance award" organization receiving Federal funding. For assistance (including a point of contact), see "Instructions for Preparing SC-CH F-560, Environmental Evaluation Notification Form ". Solicitation/Award No. (if applicable): N/A Organization Name: New Brunswick Laboratory (NBL) Title of Proposed Project/Research: GENERIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) FOR THE NBL: Renovations and maintenance activities for buildings, structures, infrastructures and equipment

459

DOE Annual NEPA Planning Summary report templates 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

spreadsheet headings to include the name of the program office or field organization." spreadsheet headings to include the name of the program office or field organization." "Updated 2013 APS templates (December 2012)" "Annual NEPA Planning Summary " "Environmental Assessments Ongoing or Expected to be Prepared in the Next 12 Months" "Enter the name of the reporting organization here: Program Office or Field Organization" "Enter APS report date here" "Title, Location, Document Number","Reserved For GC use","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (NEPA Milestones)",,"Description (including indications of cancelled documents)" ,,,"EA Determination Date:" ,,,"Transmittal to State:" ,,,"EA Approval:"

460

Preamble: CEQ NEPA regulations (1986): Incomplete or Unavailable Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

618 618 Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 80 / Friday, April 25, 1986 / Rules a n d Regulations - -- COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 40 CFR Part 1502 National Environmental Pollcy Act Regulations; Incomplete or Unavailable Information AGENCY: Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) promulgates regulations, binding on all federal agencies, to implement the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The regulations address the administration of the NEPA process, including preparation of environmental impact statements for major federal actions which significantly affect the quality of the human environment. On August 9 . 1985, CEQ published a proposed

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa permitting quarterly" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

NEPA Implementation Procedures; Appendices I, II, and III  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ - Friday December 21, 1984 DOE Note: Some contact information may be outdated. Refer to the current edition of Directory o f Potential Stakeholders for Department of Energy Actions under the National Environmental Policy Act (updated annually). Part 11 Council on Environmental Quality 40 CFR Ch. V National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementation Procedures; Appendices I, II, and 111; Final Rule 49750 Federal Register I Vol. 49, No. 247 / Friday, December 21, 1984 I Rules and Regulations COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 40 CFRCh. V National Envircnmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementation Procedures; Appendices I, I!, and lli AGENCY: Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President. ACTION: Appendices to regulations,

462

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorical Exclusion (CX)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determination A. Proposed Action Title: Demolition of Building 211 B. SSO NEPA Control #: SS-SC-13-01 AN#: 13011 ________________________________________________________________________ C. Brief Description of Proposed Action: SLAC proposes to demolish Building 211 located in the Research Yard. Building 211 is a 1,280 square foot mobile prefabricated steel frame modular building that is set on concrete blocks. The building was constructed in 1966. The project site is located in the southeast portion of the Research Yard that has previously been disturbed by grading and construction activities. The SLAC site has been subject to several field reconnaissance surveys by Stanford University archaeological

463

Air Pollution Control Permit to Construct and Permit to Operate...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

to commencing construction of the facility. Fuel-burning boilers, coal, oil, or natural gas-fired boiler steam generators require a permit. Gas turbines, as well as simple cycle...

464

Expedited Permitting Process for Solar Photovoltaic Systems ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Expedited Permitting Process for Solar Photovoltaic Systems (Vermont) Expedited Permitting Process for Solar Photovoltaic Systems (Vermont) Eligibility Agricultural Commercial...

465

Quarterly environmental, safety, and medical report: Second quarter, 1988  

SciTech Connect

ANG continued permitting activity during the reporting period. These activities include finalizing the revised RCRA Part B permit application; participating in the NDPDES QA/QC program; performing the required integrity tests on the deepwells; initiating a hydrogeologic assessment for the plant site; completing the DOE assigned sections for the modified permit to Construct/Operate application; preparing for the main stack CEM monitor certification test; completing the particle size distribution work on ''Donna'' coal lock vent; responding to NDSDH concerns about odor complaint followup surveys and lead in the drinking water supply; submitting a renewal application for the construction waste landfill; and requesting approval to dispose of spent shift catalyst in the gasifier ash pit. ANG conducted eight monitoring programs in the vicinity of the Great Plains facility. Major activities for these ambient monitoring programs are subsequently summarized. The RAMP network consists of five monitoring sites, and it is designed to monitor meteorology and air quality in the vicinity of the Great Plains facility and the Antelope Valley and Coyote electric generating stations. There was one exceedence of the air quality standards for TSP during the reporting period. ANG conducts ambient monitoring for H/sub 2/S at one site in the vicinity of the Great Plains facility. ANG conducts additional ambient monitoring for SO/sub 2/ at two (2) sites in order to ensure that ambient air quality standards are not violated during periods when H/sub 2/S- bearing wastes gases are incinerated in the event of temporary SRU shutdown. ANG conducts groundwater monitoring programs on a quarterly basis that are associated with desulfurization-gasifier ash waste disposal, deepwell injection, gasifier ash disposal, and the surge ponds. Major activities on each program are summarized.

1988-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Presidential Permits | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Presidential Permits Presidential Permits Presidential Permits Below is a listing of all the presidential permits grouped by Canada and Mexico. View the Presidental Permits - Mexico View the Presidential Permits - Canada PRESIDENTIAL PERMITS - CANADA BACK TO TOP Docket No. Company Date Issued PP-6 Puget Sound Energy 04/28/81 PP-10 BPA 10/27/45 PP-10-1 BPA 11/30/65 PP-11-2 Fraser Papers 02/29/99 PP-11 Fraser Papers (Rescinded in PP-366) 11/18/10 PP-12 Maine 12/05/63 PP-13 NiMo Hogansburg 01/31/48 PP-18 Glacier Electric 12/12/52 PP-20 Eastern Maine 05/25/65 PP-22 BC Hydro 08/24/67 PP-22-1 BC Hydro 07/21/55 PP-22-2 BC Hydro 02/04/58 PP-22-3 BC Hydro 08/24/67 PP-22-4 BCTC 09/05/07 PP-23 Netley 07/20/55 PP-24 Long Sault 06/06/80 PP-25 NYPA 06/06/80 PP-28 Northern Electric 04/17/63

467

NEPA and Children's Health [EPA][2012]  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 AUG 1 2012 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Addressing Children's Health through Reviews Conducted Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act FROM: Susan Broom Director, Office of Federal Activities Peter Grevatt Director, Office of Children's Health Protection TO: Regional 309 Environmental Review and Regional Children's Environmental Health Coordinators Executive Order 13045, "Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks " (April 21, 1997), directs Federal agencies, to the extent permitted by law and appropriate, to make it a high priority to identify and assess environmental health and safety risks that may disproportionately affect children and to ensure that policies, programs, activities,

468

Advanced Burner Reactor Preliminary NEPA Data Study.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) is a new nuclear fuel cycle paradigm with the goals of expanding the use of nuclear power both domestically and internationally, addressing nuclear waste management concerns, and promoting nonproliferation. A key aspect of this program is fast reactor transmutation, in which transuranics recovered from light water reactor spent fuel are to be recycled to create fast reactor transmutation fuels. The benefits of these fuels are to be demonstrated in an Advanced Burner Reactor (ABR), which will provide a representative environment for recycle fuel testing, safety testing, and modern fast reactor design and safeguard features. Because the GNEP programs will require facilities which may have an impact upon the environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), preparation of a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for GNEP is being undertaken by Tetra Tech, Inc. The PEIS will include a section on the ABR. In support of the PEIS, the Nuclear Engineering Division of Argonne National Laboratory has been asked to provide a description of the ABR alternative, including graphics, plus estimates of construction and operations data for an ABR plant. The compilation of this information is presented in the remainder of this report. Currently, DOE has started the process of engaging industry on the design of an Advanced Burner Reactor. Therefore, there is no specific, current, vendor-produced ABR design that could be used for this PEIS datacall package. In addition, candidate sites for the ABR vary widely as to available water, geography, etc. Therefore, ANL has based its estimates for construction and operations data largely on generalization of available information from existing plants and from the environmental report assembled for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP) design [CRBRP, 1977]. The CRBRP environmental report was chosen as a resource because it thoroughly documents the extensive evaluation which was performed on the anticipated environmental impacts of that plant. This source can be referenced in the open literature and is publicly available. The CRBRP design was also of a commercial demonstration plant size - 975 MWth - which falls in the middle of the range of ABR plant sizes being considered (250 MWth to 2000 MWth). At the time the project was cancelled, the CRBRP had progressed to the point of having completed the licensing application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and was in the process of receiving NRC approval. Therefore, it was felt that [CRBRP, 1977] provides some of the best available data and information as input to the GNEP PEIS work. CRBRP was not the source of all the information in this document. It is also expected that the CRBRP data will be bounding from the standpoint of commodity usage because fast reactor vendors will develop designs which will focus on commodity and footprint reduction to reduce the overall cost per kilowatt electric compared with the CRBR plant. Other sources used for this datacall information package are explained throughout this document and in Appendix A. In particular, see Table A.1 for a summary of the data sources used to generate the datacall information.

Briggs, L. L.; Cahalan, J. E.; Deitrich, L. W.; Fanning, T. H.; Grandy, C.; Kellogg, R.; Kim, T. K.; Yang, W. S.; Nuclear Engineering Division

2007-10-15T23:59:59.000Z

469

Tennessee Energy Statistics Quarterly, third quarter 1984  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Tennessee Energy Statistics Quarterly presents the most current energy statistics available which are specific to the State of Tennessee. In every instance possible, county-level energy data are also shown. The report covers three substantive areas of the energy flow - production, consumption, and pricing. The specific energy types for which data are included are coal, petroleum, natural gas and electricity.

Finley, T.F. III; Hensley, B.D.; Trotter, T.

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

470

GRR/Section 9-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GRR/Section 9-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process GRR/Section 9-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process < GRR Jump to: navigation, search GRR-logo.png GEOTHERMAL REGULATORY ROADMAP Roadmap Home Roadmap Help List of Sections Section 9-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process 09-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process.pdf Click to View Fullscreen Contact Agencies Department of Energy Council on Environmental Quality United States Environmental Protection Agency Regulations & Policies National Environmental Policy Act 10 CFR § 1021 - DOE NEPA Regulations Triggers None specified Click "Edit With Form" above to add content 09-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process.pdf 09-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process.pdf 09-FD-e - DOE NEPA Process.pdf Error creating thumbnail: Page number not in range. Flowchart Narrative Whenever the Department of Energy (DOE) considers funding, licensing, or

471

Well Permits (District of Columbia)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Well permits are required for the installation of wells in private and public space. Wells are defined as any trest hole, shaft, or soil excavation created by any means including, but not limited...

472

Quarterly Coal Report - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Quarterly Coal Report Quarterly Coal Report Release Date: October 02, 2013 | Next Release Date: December 2013 | full report Previous Quarterly Coal Data historical data (PDF): 1st quarter 2013 4th quarter 2012 3rd quarter 2012 2nd quarter 2012 1st quarter 2012 4th quarter 2011 3rd quarter 2011 2nd quarter 2011 1st quarter 2011 prior to 2011 Go The Quarterly Coal Report (QCR) provides detailed quarterly data on U.S. coal production, exports, imports, receipts, prices, consumption, quality, stocks, and refined coal. Data on U.S. coke production, consumption, stocks, imports, and exports are also provided. All data for 2011 and prior years are final. All data for 2012 and 2013 are preliminary. Highlights for second quarter 2013: U.S. coal production during second quarter 2013 totaled 243.1