Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

NEPA Lessons Learned, September 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 1 5 1 Register through the DOE NEPA Conference Web site at www.NEPA35.org National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Third Quarter FY 2005 September 1, 2005; Issue No. 44 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS To observe the 35th anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environment, Safety

2

NEPA Lessons Learned Questionnaire  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Learned Questionnaire Learned Questionnaire Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance U.S. Department of Energy Preface Your timely completion of this questionnaire will aid the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance in meeting its responsibility to foster continuing improvement of the Department of Energy's National Environmental Policy Act process. In accordance with DOE Order 451.1B, National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program, NEPA Document Managers and NEPA Compliance Officers should fill out a questionnaire (separately or jointly) as soon as possible after completing each environmental impact statement (EIS) and environmental assessment (EA). Other document preparation team members are encouraged to also submit a questionnaire. The questionnaire is designed to structure your responses, but you should feel free to attach a statement describing

3

NEPA Lessons Learned Second Quarter FY 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 1 6 1 (continued on page 4) Second Quarter FY 2006 June 1, 2006; Issue No. 47 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A Quality + Leadership = NEPA Success NEPA 35 Earns Special Award from NAEP; see page 3 DOE's NEPA Compliance Offi cers discussed quality assurance during the interactive meeting of more than

4

NEPA Lessons Learned June 2010 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

10 1 10 1 Second Quarter FY 2010 June 1, 2010; Issue No. 63 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A To mark the 40 th anniversary of NEPA, the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance is inviting distinguished NEPA practitioners to share their thoughts on the occasion. In this issue, Anne Norton Miller, former Director of the Office of

5

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report June 2001  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Second Quarter FY 2001 June 1, 2001; Issue No. 27 continued on page 3 The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, The DOE NEPA Compliance Officers will meet in Washington, DC, June 13 and 14, on the theme of “NEPA: What’s New, What’s Next.” Horst Greczmiel, CEQ’s Associate Director for NEPA Oversight, and Anne Miller, Acting Director of the EPA’s Office of Federal

6

NEPA Lessons Learned March 2010 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 1 0 1 First Quarter FY 2010 March 1, 2010; Issue No. 62 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 18) The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) marked the 40 th anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and of CEQ itself, with a celebratory symposium and reception in Washington, DC, on February 18, 2010.

7

NEPA Lessons Learned March 2011 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 1 1 First Quarter FY 2011 March 1, 2011; Issue No. 66 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A DOE's publication of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the Department's NEPA regulations marks a major milestone in updating its categorical exclusions (CXs). Since DOE last revised the "classes of actions" in

8

NEPA Lessons Learned, June 2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 2004 June 2004 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Second Quarter FY 2004 June 1, 2004; Issue No. 39 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS The recent scoping meetings for the Yucca Mountain Rail Alignment Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), using an "open house" format rather than more formal presentations, provided valuable information to the Department regarding issues of concern to the public. More than 300 persons who participated in the scoping meetings had the opportunity to engage in one-on-one dialogue with DOE representatives, discussing concerns and receiving answers to their questions. Individuals were also able to provide oral comments to a court reporter for the record. "An open and collaborative planning process is essential

9

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report December 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Fourth Quarter FY 2000 December 1, 2000; Issue No. 25 DOE NEPA Order Revised, National Nuclear Security Administration Responsibilities Outlined On October 26, 2000, the Deputy Secretary of Energy issued DOE O 451.1B, National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program, to accommodate National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) NEPA responsibilities. The revised Order has an expanded section on applicability and a new section on NNSA procedures. With respect to an EIS for an NNSA activity, the NNSA Administrator will fulfill the responsibilities of a Secretarial Officer (including consulting with the NNSA General Counsel), and the Secretary or Deputy

10

NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This document contains a compilation of NEPA "success stories" that were featured in DOE Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports (LLQRs). Feature articles in LLQR have described how the NEPA process provided an organized structure for making some of the Department's most complex decisions. NEPA reviews have resulted in significant project cost savings through informed decision making. Some articles have highlighted ways in which the NEPA process improved environmental outcomes, such as by identifying better alternatives or more effective mitigation. Some articles have put the spotlight on procedural success, such as effective public

11

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Questionnaire | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Questionnaire NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Questionnaire NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Questionnaire This questionnaire is used to collect information from the Department of Energy (DOE) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Community. In accordance with DOE Order 451.1B, NEPA Compliance Program, NEPA Document Managers and NEPA Compliance Officers should fill out a questionnaire (separately or jointly) as soon as possible after completing each environmental impact statement (EIS) and environmental assessment (EA). Questionaires also may be returned earlier, at any time during the NEPA process, to share valuable lessons learned with others. Other document preparation team members also are encouraged to submit a questionnaire. Information provided through this questionaire helps the Office of NEPA

12

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter FY 1998  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SEPTEMBER 1998 1 SEPTEMBER 1998 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT DOE NEPA Community to Meet in October For Third Quarter FY 1998 September 1, 1998, Issue No. 16 On October 14 and 15, 1998, the DOE NEPA Community will meet in North Las Vegas, hosted by the Nevada Operations Office at its new Support Facility. The Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance is sponsoring this meeting to improve DOE NEPA performance through sharing of lessons learned and discussion of current issues. Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process Managing the NEPA Process The meeting will focus on issues that NEPA Document Managers face daily: What tools and techniques can help

13

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report 1st Quarter FY 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A Inside LESSONS LEARNED March 1, 1996 Quarterly Report LESSONS LEARNED National Environmental Policy Act U.S. Department of Energy Welcome to the newly-revised Quarterly Report of Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. In response to reader suggestions, we have expanded the scope of the report to provide a wider variety of NEPA- related information, and enhanced the format for better clarity and overall readability. This Quarterly Report includes: * NEPA lessons learned at the Hanford Site - Page 1 * Mini-guidance on the preparation of EIS summaries, properly eliminating alternatives and impacts from detailed analysis, application of DOE NEPA regulations to procurement, and NEPA questions and answers - Pages 3-6 * Updates on the proposed amendments to DOE's NEPA

14

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY 1995  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

. . National Environmental Policy Act N E P . A LESSONS Office of NEPA LEARNED QUARTERLY REPORT 1ST QUARTER FY 1995 Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy March 1,1995 ODU- To foster continuing improvement of the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA, issued June 13, 1994, requires the Office of Environment Safety and Health to solicit comments from the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Officer, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement and environmental assessment on lessons learned in the process, and to distribute a quarterly summary to all,NEPA Compliance Officers and NEPA Document Managers. This second quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between October 1 and December 31, 1994. It is based on responses to the revised

15

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1994  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LESSONS LEARNED QUARTERLY REPORT 4TH QUARTER FY1994 Oflicx of NEPA Oversight U.S. Department of Energy December ~ 1994 INTRODUCTION . To fdster continuing improvementof the Department's National Environmental policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEP& issued June 13, 1994, requires the OffIceof Environment StUetyand Health to soiicit comments tkom the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Offker, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement and environmental assessment on lessons learned in the proces~ and to distribute a -Y SUmmW tOall NEpA Gmplf-c Offfcem and NEPA Document Managem On August Q 1994 the Oftice of NEPA Oversight distributed an interhddraft kSSOI.W ]WImed questionnaire to NEPA contacts to be used for reporting on environmental impact statements and environmental assessments approvedbetween

16

NEPA Lessons Learned December 2010 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 1 0 1 Fourth Quarter FY 2010 December 1, 2010; Issue No. 65 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A CEQ Issues Categorical Exclusion Guidance After coordinating with Federal agencies and addressing public comments, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued final guidance on Establishing, Applying,

17

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter FY 1997  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

For Inside LESSONS LEARNED For Inside LESSONS LEARNED See Page 2 Do you need an environmental assessment, environmental impact statement, environmental report or a portion of one? Would you like to begin work within a few weeks? Would you like to use the best, most experienced contractors at unbeatable prices? Do you want to fully control your NEPA contracting locally? We will soon have contracts that will let you do all this and more! This may sound too good to be true, but the hard work of the DOE-wide NEPA Contract Source Evaluation Panel (and many others in the NEPA contract reform initiative) have made this dream a reality. The Panel, chaired by Roger Twitchell, NEPA Compliance Officer, Idaho Operations Office, has implemented ideas first discussed at the NEPA Contracting Reform Workshop in

18

NEPA Lessons Learned Third Quarter 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 2007 1 Third Quarter FY 2007 September 4, 2007; Issue No. 52 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 4) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has announced its plan to evaluate eight DOE sites and two generic locations for the proposed disposal of about 5,600 cubic meters

19

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 3rd Quarter FY 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 1999 September 1999 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Third Quarter FY 1999 September 1, 1999; Issue No. 20 Proposed Arizona-Mexico Transmission Project Presents Challenges to NEPA Process and Analysis By: Ellen Russell, NEPA Document Manager, Fossil Energy with Carolyn Osborne, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance continued on page 3 Fossil Energy (FE) is preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS) for what would be the first cross-border high-voltage transmission project to connect the main power delivery systems of the United States and Mexico (DOE/EIS-0307). EIS scoping has been complex. Through the scoping process, FE has identified and worked with many stakeholders to define a broad range

20

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2000 2000 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For First Quarter FY 2000 March 1, 2000; Issue No. 22 Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS Helps DOE Preserve Unique Resources continued on page 4 By: Thomas W. Ferns, NEPA Document Manager, Richland Operations Office, and Yardena Mansoor, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance A 50-year land-use plan for the Hanford Site? Some said it couldn't be done. Too many factions, they said, with irreconcilably different visions for the future. Would NEPA be a help or a hindrance in developing such a land-use plan? It turns out that the Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS Record of Decision (ROD) (64 FR 61615; November 12, 1999) marks the end of a successful, albeit

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY 1997  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Decisionmakers Decisionmakers States/Local Governm ents Agencies Academ icians Congress Framers of NEPA Drafters of CEQ Regs Native Am erican Tribes La wyers NGOs/ Citizen Groups Businesses Council on Environmental Quality NEPA Effectiveness Study Partners continued next page -- Improved Implementation Needed -- -- DOE Leadership Highlighted -- CEQ Study: NEPA a "Success" Overall National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. Department of Energy Quarterly Report LESSONS LEARNED LESSONS LEARNED For First Quarter FY 1997 March 3, 1997 The President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued in January the results of its extensive study on the effectiveness of the National Environmental Policy Act during the statute's 25-year history. From the cover letter by CEQ Chair Kathleen McGinty to its four short appendices, the 50-page booklet entitled The National Environmental

22

NEPA Lessons Learned September 2011 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 1 1 The median cost and time to complete DOE environmental assessments (EAs) decreased substantially during 2009 and 2010, according to data collected by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (NEPA Office), even though DOE's overall NEPA workload more than doubled during the same time period (Figures 1 and 2). The improved performance metrics are attributable to the preparation of

23

NEPA Lessons Learned Cumulative Index December 2012 1 DOE NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Cumulative Index December 2012 1 Cumulative Index December 2012 1 DOE NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report A Accident Analyses Sep 95/12; Dec 95/15; Sep 97/7; Sep 98/7; Dec 98/5; Jun 00/3, 8 guidance issued for preparation of Sep 02/16; Dec 02/20 Adaptive Management also see: Environmental Management Systems Dec 02/8; Jun 07/17; Jun 08/8 training Dec 06/16 Administrative Record also see: Legal Issues Mar 97/13; Sep 97/7; Jun 98/7; Dec 98/4 Advisory Council on Historic Preservation also see: National Historic Preservation Act Dec 98/11; Jun 99/3; Sep 99/2; Dec 00/6; Jun 01/8; Dec 01/6; Sep 02/17; Dec 03/13; Sep 04/16 Affected Environment Sep 95/12; Dec 98/7; Sep 00/8 Air Force Sep 11/10 Alternative Arrangements (emergency actions) see: Council on Environmental Quality: alternative arrangements

24

NEPA Lessons Learned September 2010 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 1 0 1 The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) recently issued its report on the NEPA process related to drilling of the Macondo well, which was the source of the April 20, 2010, accident and subsequent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The report contains useful reminders to all NEPA practitioners of the importance of transparency and accountability in the NEPA process. It

25

NEPA Lessons Learned Third Quarter FY 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 1 6 1 a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (Rail Alignment EIS, in preparation). Other elements of the court order also are of general interest to NEPA practitioners, including those related to the "hard look" standard, expressions of an agency's preferred alternative, and the need for potential plaintiffs to raise concerns during the NEPA process.

26

NEPA Lessons Learned March 2012 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 1 2 1 Frequent communication between senior program managers and NEPA staff, as well as close coordination among all involved DOE offices, enabled the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) to meet the challenge of completing an unprecedented number of NEPA reviews in recent years. From 2009 through 2011, EERE distributed approximately $16.8 billion from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

27

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 1999 December 1999 1 continued on page 3 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Fourth Quarter FY 1999 December 1, 1999; Issue No. 21 Good Information, Good Government Using Technology to Improve NEPA Decisionmaking provides a comprehensive guide to Federal environmental information resources available electronically and to useful Web sites provided by nongovernmental groups and professional organizations. “One of the foundations of good government is good information,” President Clinton observed. NEPA is “at its core, a mandate for informed, democratic decisionmaking. And its contribution to environmental protection is incalculable.” Managing a National Public Participation

28

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter FY 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 1999 June 1999 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Second Quarter FY 1999 June 1, 1999; Issue No. 19 continued on page 6 NEPA and Habitat Management Plan: Environmental Synergy By: Elizabeth Withers, NEPA Compliance Officer, Los Alamos Area Office, with John Stetson, Pacific Western Technologies, Ltd. On the day DOE issued the Draft EIS for the Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), LANL biologists discovered a nesting pair of Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida) – which had only recently been listed as threatened – in the canyons directly below the proposed site. Today, this nest site, at the edge

29

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For First Quarter FY 1999 March 1, 1999; Issue No. 18 continued on page 3 Dr. David Michaels, new Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health, enthusiastically supports the Lessons Learned approach. Dr. David Michaels — DOE’s New Leader for Environment, Safety and Health The new Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health, Dr. David Michaels, recognizes the value of NEPA in supporting good decisions. “I understand the importance of examining options carefully before we make decisions that will affect our workers, the public, and the environment in lasting and profound ways,” he said. “We must be fully informed of the environmental

30

NEPA Lessons Learned December 2011 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 1 1 The Department of Energy (DOE) has revised its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021) to better align them with current DOE missions and improve the efficiency and transparency of its environmental reviews. The revisions focus on the categorical exclusion provisions. Since DOE last revised its categorical exclusions 15 years

31

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report. December 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 1 5 1 More Inside on NEPA 35 CEQ Chairman Connaughton's Address ......... 5 Plenary Sessions.............................................. 6 Training Sessions .......................................... 14 Breakout Sessions ......................................... 15 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2005 December 5, 2005; Issue No. 45

32

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report September 2001, No. 27, Third Quarter FY 2001  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA NEPA Lessons Lear ned September 2001 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Third Quarter FY 2001 September 4, 2001; Issue No. 28 continued on page 2 NEPA Compliance Officers Consider Further Improvements "What's New, What's Next," was the theme of the Department of Energy (DOE) NEPA Compliance Officers (NCOs) meeting on June 13 and 14, 2001, in Washington, DC. Convened by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, the meeting involved 70 participants including Program and Field Office NCOs, Headquarters NEPA attorneys, and others. In welcoming participants, Carol Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, recounted recent goals for DOE's NEPA Compliance Program before considering new challenges. She noted that in the 1990s, the Department achieved significant improvements

33

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Third Quarter 2000 (09/01/00)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Lessons Learned September 2000 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Third Quarter FY 2000 September 1, 2000; Issue No. 24 NEPA staff positions open. Apply by September 8. See page 2. Emergency NEPA Procedures Invoked for Actions Taken after Los Alamos Fire To avert further harm in the wake of the May 2000 Los Alamos wildfire, DOE is taking emergency actions with potentially significant impacts, without preparing an EIS. Instead, DOE is proceeding under “alternative arrangements” to comply with NEPA, as provided under 40 CFR 1506.11, a section of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA regulations that deals with emergency circumstances. The specific alternative

34

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1, 2005; Issue No. 43; Second Quarter FY 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 1 5 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Second Quarter FY 2005 June 1, 2005; Issue No. 43 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS (continued on page 4) Who Has More Than 500 Years of NEPA Experience? A Closer Look at the DOE NEPA Compliance Officers Who are these 47 individuals? What inspires their commitment to the environment? How do they carry out

35

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, First Quarter FY 2005 (March 1, 2005)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 1 5 1 Green Book, Second Edition, Issued; see page 4 New Assistant Secretary Shaw Promotes NEPA as Essential to Energy Mission and Goals National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT First Quarter FY 2005 March 1, 2005; Issue No. 42 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS (continued on page 3) In a recent interview for Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, John Spitaleri Shaw, the new Assistant Secretary for

36

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1, 2004; Issue No. 38; First Quarter FY 2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2004 March 2004 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT First Quarter FY 2004 March 1, 2004; Issue No. 38 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS Need Help Preparing NEPA Documents? New, Improved "Green Book" Is on the Way (continued on page 15) By: Carl Sykes, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Carl Sykes is leading the charge to strengthen the Green Book, DOE's NEPA primer. The time has come for the DOE NEPA Community to work together to strengthen our basic NEPA guidebook, Recommendations for the Preparation of Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements (also known as the "Green Book"). The Green Book (www.eh.doe.gov/nepa under Guidance) is certainly no weakling: it provides succinct recommendations for key

37

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Fourth Quarter FY 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 1 6 1 Fourth Quarter FY 2006 December 1, 2006; Issue No. 49 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 6) Scoping Process Underway for Two Yucca Mountain EISs The Department of Energy (DOE) recently initiated public scoping for two EISs related to Yucca Mountain, the Nation's proposed repository for disposal of commercial

38

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Second Quarter FY 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 1 7 1 Second Quarter FY 2007 June 1, 2007; Issue No. 51 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A We have all been told to "work together" to accomplish a particular goal. Together Everyone Achieves More illustrates the benefi ts of "teamwork." Federal agencies, including the Council on Environmental Quality

39

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Third Quarter FY 2003 (September2, 2003)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 2003 September 2003 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Third Quarter FY 2003 September 2, 2003; Issue No. 36 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS DOE NEPA Community Gauges Progress In Its Continuing Pursuit of Excellence continued on page 3 "I believe we will never get to a point where we say this is done, there is nothing left to learn." - Beverly Cook "Are We There Yet?" - that is, has DOE achieved its goals for NEPA process improvement? - was the theme of the DOE NEPA Community Meeting on July 15 and 16, 2003. Participants considered DOE's NEPA performance with respect to multiple objectives using a variety of measures, finding both substantial progress and room for improvement. The meeting included

40

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Issue No. 37; Fourth Quarter FY 2003 (12/1/03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 2003 December 2003 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2003 December 1, 2003; Issue No. 37 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS What's Next? CEQ Seeks More Input on Task Force Recommendations continued on page 3 NEPA practitioners, agencies, special interest groups, and the general public are reacting to recommendations intended to improve and modernize NEPA implementation presented in the NEPA Task Force Report to the Council on Environmental Quality: Modernizing NEPA Implementation, issued in September 2003. Through a series of meetings and regional roundtable discussions, CEQ is now seeking broad input on what should be done, how it should be done, and with what priority. Noting that the Report was to,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Issue No. 41; Fourth Quarter FY 2004; December 1, 2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 1 4 1 The EIS Comment-Response Process Guidance Issued; see page 9 Putting the Web to Work for NEPA National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2004 December 1, 2004; Issue No. 41 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS (continued on page 4) "What's your e-mail address? Do you have a Web site?" These are common questions in

42

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 1st Quarter FY 1998  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1998 1 March 1998 1 continued on page 2 For First Quarter FY 1998 March 2, 1998, Issue No. 14 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A LESSONS LEARNED LESSONS LEARNED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Managing Progress on the Repository EIS How to Move a Mountain Tour members approach the entry to the Yucca Mountain Exploratory Studies Facility. The EIS Management Council, along with members and technical advisors of the EIS Preparation Team, visited the site in January while participating in briefings on technical, legal, and policy issues. How do you manage preparation of a major EIS that is important to five Program Offices, four Field Offices, and other Federal agencies, not to mention a wide array of stakeholders? How do you address extremely complex and

43

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter FY 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA and Contracting Communities NEPA and Contracting Communities Take Action Following Workshops Innovative ideas for improving the Department’s NEPA contracting process emerged from the first gathering of field office and headquarters NEPA and procurement specialists at a workshop sponsored by the Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance, in partnership with the Office of Human Resources and Administration and the Office of General Counsel. The March 1996 NEPA Contracting Reform Workshop explored the theme of “Do It Right the First Time,” the central recommendation of the Phase II NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance that the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health issued in December 1995. The March Workshop’s purpose was to identify contracting actions that can achieve NEPA process cost savings through better management of existing contracts and

44

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (03/01), Issue No. 26  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2001 March 2001 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For First Quarter FY 2001 March 1, 2001; Issue No. 26 continued on page 3 By: Paul Bayer, NEPA Document Manager, and Clarence Hickey, NEPA Compliance Officer, Office of Science Innovative Field Research Benefits from NEPA Review The high costs and long times frequently needed to clean up contaminated Department of Energy (DOE) sites have created a demand for better and cheaper cleanup technologies. A promising new method for cleaning up subsurface contamination is bioremediation. However, field experience to validate laboratory results is lacking. Preparing an environmental assessment (EA) helped DOE's Office of Science plan an effective field-based

45

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

continued next page continued next page Theme of October NEPA Compliance Officers Meeting Leading members of DOE’s NEPA community shared professional experiences and reflected upon job challenges at the DOE NEPA Compliance Officers (NCO) meeting held in Washington, DC on October 29-30. In addition to 29 NCOs, the participants included staff from the Offices of NEPA Policy and Assistance and the Assistant General Counsel for Environment. The meeting featured informal small group discussions, rather than presentations to a large audience. The meeting examined NCO and Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) roles and responsibilities, NEPA contracting reform, and how to get the most from programmatic NEPA documents. An early brainstorming session elicited aspects of the DOE NEPA compliance

46

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1997  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 1997 December 1997 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A LESSONS LEARNED LESSONS LEARNED For Fourth Quarter FY 1997 December 1, 1997, Issue No. 13 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT continued on page 2 I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£ I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£ I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£ I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£ I@Q6£Sr‰vr£6qq†£W W W W Whyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq hyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq hyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq hyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq hyˆr£‡‚£Q…‚ƒ‚†rq Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r Thyr£‚s£Ih‰hy£Qr‡…‚yrˆ€£Sr†r…‰r The endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox would continue to be protected after sale of NPR-1. (Photo courtesy of

47

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Welcome to the 81st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features tools to help NEPA practitioners perform NEPA reviews.

48

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Lessons Learned Quarterly Report DOE's NEPA Lessons Learned Program was initiated in 1994 to foster continuous improvement in NEPA compliance by measuring DOE NEPA performance and gathering information learned through NEPA experience. The Program collects and publishes time and cost metrics to help DOE objectively focus on controlling these aspects of its NEPA compliance, and disseminates information broadly relevant to NEPA implementation, such guidance on public participation and interagency coordination procedures. The keystone of DOE's NEPA Lessons Learned Program is the Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR). The LLQR is produced as a means of disseminating NEPA program metrics, along with related guidance, case studies, analysis,

49

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 3, 2008; Issue No. 54; First Quarter FY 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

08 1 08 1 First Quarter FY 2008 March 3, 2008; Issue No. 54 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 3) Programmatic EIS on Nuclear Weapons Complex Draws National Interest, Many Comments Dinah Bear, General Counsel Council on Environmental Quality Anne Norton Miller, Director Offi ce of Federal Activities

50

LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

first Quarter fy 2013 first Quarter fy 2013 march 1, 2013; Issue no. 74 NEPA Lessons Learned March 2013 1 Sharing DOE's NEPA Success Stories A primary purpose of DOE's Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR), which chronicles the Department's NEPA activities, is to disseminate successful approaches for NEPA compliance. LLQR provides a platform for NEPA Document Managers and other preparers of an environmental impact statement (EIS) or environmental assessment (EA) to evaluate their experience and share lessons learned within the DOE NEPA Community. Information is solicited through a Lessons Learned Questionnaire. Members of the document preparation team for each completed EIS and EA are asked to rate the effectiveness of the NEPA process in terms of protection of the environment and influence on decisionmaking, and

51

NEPA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Learned September 2009 1 Learned September 2009 1 Third Quarter FY 2009 September 1, 2009; Issue No. 60 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A DOE General Counsel Scott Blake Harris Aims To Improve the NEPA Review Process In his first month on the job, DOE's new General Counsel, Scott Blake Harris, issued operating principles for NEPA document review by the Office of General Counsel (GC) to reduce the time required for such reviews and avoid multiple rounds of comments, particularly for

52

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, First Quarter FY 2006; Issue No. 46; March 1, 2006  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 1 6 1 below, the Agreement emphasizes transparency and quality assurance in the NEPA process. Secretary Samuel W. Bodman, in announcing the Agreement on January 9, 2006, said both parties "will be able to shift their focus and resources away from litigation and toward partnership and our shared cleanup goals." At the same time, Jay Manning, Director, Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology),

53

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA process. This issue examines some recent developments and practices in the use of GIS for NEPA and related environmental reviews. December 2, 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly...

54

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

51st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features collaboration as a key element of a successful NEPA process. Related articles discuss approaches...

55

NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; March 3, 2009; Issue No. 58; First Quarter FY 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2009 March 2009 1 The Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for more than $45 billion of the $787 billion economic stimulus funding contained in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act), which President Barack Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009 (Public Law 111-5). The President and Congress have emphasized urgency in getting this money into the economy in order to create jobs. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has set a goal to disburse 70 percent of the funds by the end of 2010. Achieving this goal requires the timely completion of all requirements, including compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The DOE Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance and the

56

NEPA Lessions Learned Quarterly Report - 4th Quarter FY 1998  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DECEMBER 1998 DECEMBER 1998 1 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT For Fourth Quarter FY 1998 December 1, 1998, Issue No. 17 New and Improved NEPA Compliance Guide Issued in 2 Volumes A new and improved DOE NEPA Compliance Guide, issued by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health, has been distributed to about 750 members of the DOE NEPA Community. Intended to foster sound and efficient NEPA compliance, the Compliance Guide is a collection of resources and references to aid in NEPA document preparation and other aspects of the NEPA process. Volume I, General NEPA References, contains the statute, and regulations and guidance from the Council on Environmental Quality, the Department of State, and the

57

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Welcome to the 78th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue examines some recent developments and practices in the use of GIS for NEPA and related environmental reviews.

58

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1, 2002 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2002 Welcome to the 30th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. December 5, 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly...

59

U.S. Department of Energy NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Second Quarter FY 2003; June 2, 2003; Issue No. 35  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 2003 June 2003 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Second Quarter FY 2003 June 2, 2003; Issue No. 35 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS Responding to Comments Is Work, But It Makes the NEPA Process Work continued on page 3 Ray Berube Retires Beverly Cook, Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health, wishes Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment Ray Berube well on his retirement. See tribute on page 19. Considering comments received on a draft EIS, and responding to those comments appropriately in the final EIS, can be a daunting task. Even a "great" draft EIS can generate lots of public comment. At times, the process of collecting, sorting, reviewing, and responding to public comments is complex and time-consuming.

60

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Welcome to the 73rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we highlight practices of DOEs NEPA Community that help ensure the quality of our NEPA reviews. Emphasizing quality throughout the NEPA process is essential to meeting schedules and providing useful information to the public and decisionmakers.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Guidance & Requirements » Lessons Learned » Lessons Learned Guidance & Requirements » Lessons Learned » Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive December 2, 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2013 Welcome to the 77th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue reminds us that, through teamwork and dedication by DOE's NEPA community, we can produce high quality documents that enhance the Department's decisionmaking and help protect the environment. September 6, 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 Welcome to the 76th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features a look at DOE's NEPA performance metrics, including a historical perspective. As DOE NEPA practitioners strive to control time and cost while maintaining quality, this most recent NEPA

62

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2001 Welcome to the 27th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. March 1, 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 Welcome to the 26th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. December 1, 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2000 Welcome to the 25th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. September 1, 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2000 Welcome to the 24th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Note that this issue includes a cumulative index covering the past six years of reports. June 1, 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2000 Welcome to the 23rd quarterly report on lessons learned in theNEPA process.

63

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2012 This issue features successful practices from recent NEPA reviews and current Council on Environmental Quality initiatives promoting efficient NEPA compliance. Articles in this issue include: Keys to Managing an Expanded NEPA Workload Recent NEPA Reviews Ilustrate Lessons Learned NEPA Order Revision Incorporates Public Review of EAs Bureau of Reclamation Updates NEPA Handbook CEQ Expands NEPA Modernization Activities CEQ Draft Guidance Promotes Efficiencies CEQ Selects Pilot Projects DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Update NEPA Contracts: Task Ordering Process Most DOE EISs Involve Cooperating Agencies Annual Planning Summaries Transitions Litigation Updates 2012 National Environmental Justice Conference Training Opportunities

64

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2004 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2004 Welcome to the 40th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. That's 40 issues! Have you read them all? We are pleased to feature the July 2004 NEPA Community Meeting in this issue, as well as our annual update of the cumulative index to LLQR. Thank you for your continuing support. Articles included in this issue: DOE's NEPA Process - Getting Better and Better NEPA Community Meeting Highlights Awards for Contributions to DOE's NEPA Program Working with Cooperating Agencies e-NEPA Improves Access and Efficiency Getting Better Through Guidance More Thoughts on Getting Better and Better NEPA Office Shares Best Practices Lessons Learned from Lessons Learned Part 4

65

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1997  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features NEPA success stories from field organizations: how the NEPA process helped resolve cultural resource protection issues at Fernald, and how innovative approaches are aiding preparation of a Site-wide EIS for Sandia, New Mexico.

66

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2001 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2001 Welcome to the 29th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Included in this issue: CEQ Chair Describes Goals, Supports NEPA Principles DOE NEPA Post-9/11: Reconciling the Need to Protect and the Need to Inform the Public Agencies Responses to Terrorist Attacks Forest Service Succeeds with NEPA Training Oak Ridge Holds NEPA Community Meeting DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Training Opportunities New on the NEPA Bookshelf Litigation Update EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Recent EIS-Related Milestones Fourth Quarter FY 2001 Questionnaire Results NEPA Document Cost and Time Facts

67

LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 September 6, 2013; Issue no. 76 NEPA Lessons Learned September 2013 1 The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance has been tracking completion times and other metrics since 1994. (See related article, page 3, and Notes on NEPA Metrics, page 4.) The NEPA Office's most recent analysis - for calendar years 2003 through 2012 - shows that completion time and cost vary considerably from document to document and often within a single year. However, overall performance, as measured through median values throughout the period, generally appears to have remained stable, notwithstanding a substantial workload. DOE's NEPA Workload The number of EISs, EAs, and categorical exclusion (CX) determinations completed each year is one measure of the Department's overall NEPA workload. DOE began

68

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2002 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2002 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2002 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2002 Welcome to the 33rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Have you noticed that NEPA has been in the news a lot lately? Although this issue of LLQR is longer than usual, I encourage you to read all the news, views, and lessons learned. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: CEQ Asks How to Improve NEPA Implementation; Responses Vary Widely DOE Cooperating Agency Report DOE Proposes Floodplain/Wetland Rule Revisions Adaptive Management and the NEPA Process Impact Mitigation at Los Alamos Institute Establishes NEPA Advisory Committee Office of Science Promotes Early NEPA Planning

69

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 4, 2007 September 4, 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2007 Welcome to the 52nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue highlights the start of two major DOE EISs and features several guest-written articles. June 1, 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2007 Welcome to the 51st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features collaboration as a key element of a successful NEPA process. Related articles discuss approaches to and benefits of collaboration and illustrate various applications. March 1, 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 Welcome to the 50th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance launched the Lessons Learned program in December 1994 to support continuous improvement in the

70

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2010 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2010 Welcome to the 64th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we feature reflections on the 40th Anniversary of NEPA from the DOE NEPA Community. We also continue to report on activities to enhance transparency in the NEPA process, including a new DOE policy and recent recommendations from CEQ. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE Uses e-NEPA To Enhance Public Participation Lessons from Oil Spill Review Apply Broadly Reflections on NEPA at 40 CX Determination: NEPA Review or Exemption? 2010 Stakeholders Directory Issued DOE NEPA Order Updated Recovery Act NEPA Reviews Keep Pace

71

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 This issue highlights practices of DOE's NEPA Community that help ensure the quality of our NEPA reviews. Emphasizing quality throughout the NEPA process is essential to meeting schedules and providing useful information to the public and decisionmakers. Articles in this issue include: Quality Assurance Integral to NEPA Implementation DOE NEPA Guidance Plans OMB-CEQ Affirm Commitment to ECR Canada's New NEPA-Like Law Transitions John Jediny Joins DOE NEPA Office EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts LLQR-2012-Q4-r1.pdf More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2013

72

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2005 Welcome to the 43rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue we take a look at our hard-working NEPA Compliance Officers, who share bits of wisdom (and a little humor) gained from their lessons learned implementing NEPA. Countless thanks to all NCOs for their dedication, flexibility, and perseverance. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles in this issue include: Who Has More Than 500 Years of NEPA Experience? A Closer Look at the DOE NEPA Compliance Officers CEQ Asks Federal Agencies to Lead NEPA Modernization Congressional NEPA Task Force Earth Day 2005 EPA Rates Action Alternatives in Moab EIS Update on Cape Wind Project

73

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2000 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2000 Welcome to the 25th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Included in this issue: CEQ Fosters Communication Among Federal NEPA Liaisons DOE NEPA Order Revised, National Nuclear Security Administration Responsibilities Outlined Focus on CEQ NEPA Liaison Topics Get to Know Your EPA EIS Reviewers List Cooperating Agencies on EIS Cover Sheets Amphibian Declines Federal Agencies Adopt Unified Watershed Management Policy Revised Historic Preservation Regulations To Be Issued Accurate Electronic NEPA Files Mini-guidance: Reduce Abbreviations Mini-guidance Collection Available Use the Glossary of Terms NAEP Award Nominations Due NEPA Contracts: Measuring Performance Quality DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Update

74

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1998 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 1998 September 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1998 Welcome to the third quarter FY 1998 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: DOE NEPA Community to Meet in October Guidance Underway to Assist NEPA Process National Academy of Public Administration Examines the DOE NEPA Process NEPA Practitioners Bookshelf Publishing a Draft EIS on the Web DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Showing Benefits NAEP Conference in San Diego Litigation Updates Presidential Memorandum on Plain Language Third Quarter FY 1998 Questionnaire Results NEPA Document Cost and Time Facts NEPA Documents Completed EIS-related Documents Recent Milestones Cumulative Index Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2002

75

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2001 Welcome to the 26th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles included in this issue: Innovative Field Research Benefits from NEPA Review Mini-guidance: $aving $ on EIS Distribution NEPA Office Needs Fewer Paper Copies of Issued Documents Analyzing All Reasonable Alternatives in an EIS NOAA Issues New Coastal Zone Regulations DOE Solicits Comments on Public Participation Policy More NNSA NEPA Procedures BLM Tool for Better Scoping Comments NEPA Staff Supported CEQ Technology Task Force Transitions When to Provide Cost Estimates in Annual NEPA Planning Summaries Some Considerations in Selecting NEPA Document Preparers DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Update

76

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2014 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features recent reports from IPCC on climate change vulnerabilities and adaptation options, and from USGCRP summarizing climate...

77

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2004 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2004 Welcome to the 39th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue we are continuing a multi-part examination of lessons learned from Lessons Learned. We invite your suggestions on how to improve the Lessons Learned program. Thank you for your continuing support. Articles included in this issue: "Open House" Format for Scoping Meetings Provides DOE Valuable Input for Yucca Rail EIS Lesson Learned from Lessons Learned Apply Common Sense: Reduce Unfamilar Abbreviations Carbon Sequestration Programmatic EIS The Libyan Connection: Emergency Action Needed NEPA Strategy Adjusts to Changing Circumstances Card Game Highlights Diversity at NEPA Clinic

78

LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Second Quarter fy 2013 Second Quarter fy 2013 June 3, 2013; Issue no. 75 NEPA Lessons Learned June 2013 1 (continued on page 4) Coordination and Substitution: Effective Options for Integrating NEPA and NHPA Section 106 The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) jointly issued a handbook in early March aimed at improving the integration of the Section 106 consultation process under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and NEPA review. NEPA and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 anticipates that benefits will include maximizing staff resources, avoiding duplication of effort, facilitating coordinated public participation, and making better informed decisions. The handbook describes the options of "coordination"

79

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2010 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2010 Welcome to the 63rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we continue our observance of the 40th anniversary of NEPA. This is a time to address the need to reinvigorate NEPA implementation for the next 40 years. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: NAEP Conference Looks to NEPA's Future Celebrating 40 Years with NEPA and Earth Day DOE NEPA Website Pursues Continuous Improvement Experience in Posting CX Determinations NEPA Then and Now: Anne Norton Miller DOE Celebrates Earth Day 40 NAEP NEPA Excellence Award BPA Honors NEPA Accomplishments Jointly Issued FR Notices

80

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1996 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1996 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: "NEPA Compliance Officers Meeting: Continuous Improvement" DOE Comments on CEQ Cumulative Impacts Handbook DOE-wide NEPA Procurement Environmental Justice Guidance Update Senate Subcommittee Focuses on NEPA DOE NEPA Rule Amendments for Power Marketing Activities Litigation Updates: Rulings on Alternatives Environmental Assessment Quality Study Fourth quarter FY1996 Lessons Learned Questionnaire results, including EIS and EA cost and time reports Analysis of EA and EIS cost and time outliers EA and EIS cost and time trend analysis Lessons Learned Quarterly Report

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 Welcome to the 58th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We have been very busy addressing our NEPA responsibilities arising from the recovery act as well as the new policies of the obama administration. In this issue of the Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR), we share ideas and experiences that will foster an improved and expedited NEPA compliance process. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Efficiency Essential to Recovery Plan NEPA Opportunities in a New Era of Openness Secretary Chu to DOE Employees: "Help Turn the Ship" Secretary Chu Pledges to Improve DOE Management New DOE-Wide NEPA Support Contracts! Sutley Brings Breadth of Government Experience to CEQ

82

75th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued 5th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued 75th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued June 3, 2013 - 4:11pm Addthis The 75th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process was issued on June 3, 2013. This issue of Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) includes articles on recent guidance by the Council on Environmental Quality and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to promote better integration of NEPA and Section 106 reviews, and on the Federal Highway Administration's Every Day Counts intitiative to better integrate planning and NEPA. "Efforts such as these to improve NEPA implementation are indicative of what we strive for at DOE every day -- better NEPA review, better decisions," said Carol Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and

83

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 Welcome to the 62nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we start a year-long observance of the 40th anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act. The occasion calls for celebration of NEPA's successes as well as reflection on opportunities for improvement. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: CEQ Celebrates NEPA at 40. . . and So Do We! DOE Launches Categorical Exclusion Database Celebrating 40 Years with NEPA CEQ Issues Draft NEPA Guidance CEQ NEPA Symposium Presidential Proclamation Reflections: Professor Mandelker

84

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1999 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1999 Welcome to the 21st Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: Good Information, Good Government; CEQ 1997 Report to Congress on Environmental Quality" Managing a National Public Participation Program for the Yucca Mountain EIS New Executive Order on Trade Agreements NEPA Challenges for Western Area Power Administration Is CD-ROM a Useful Complement to Paper Documents? Pollution Prevention and NEPA Clean Air Act Conformity and NEPA National Natural Landmark Considerations Include Distribution List in EIS Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2002 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2002

85

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2005 Welcome to the 45th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We thank all those who participated in the NEPA 35 conference. You made it successful. We hope you are as inspired as we are by the spirit of NEPA Section 101and the challenge to improve the implementation of NEPA. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: NEPA 35: Back to Basics, Back to the Future Congressional NEPA Task Force Holds Final Hearings NEPA 35 Conference Highlights CEQ Chairman Connaughton's Keynote Address Plenary Sessions NECRAC Final Report Environmental Justice and Indian Country Training Sesssions Breakout Sessions

86

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1998 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1998 Welcome to the first quarter FY 1998 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: Managing Progress on the Repository EIS Richland EA: Public Involvement and Classified Information WIPP and WM RODs Issued DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Early NEPA Review Saves Resources Technical Assistance from Core Technical Group Recent NEPA Guidance EPA Proposes Changes to Voluntary EIS Policy Anticipating the Discovery of Unknown Waste DOE Planning Summaries Provide NEPA Forecasts Recent EIS Milestones NAEP Identifies Accepted NEPA Practices Environmental Restoration's NCO Describes His Role Richlands NEPA Process Game Enlivens Training Transitions

87

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1997 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1997 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Will Be Ready to Use Soon! CEQ Initiative on NEPA Implementation DOE Submits Comments on CEQ Environmental Justice Guidance NEPA Order to Be Reissued with Conforming Changes DOE Sued on Stockpile Stewardship and Waste Management PEISs Effective NEPA Hearings Bob Strickler and Linda Thurston Retire Reminder about Stakeholder Notification Litigation Updates New Executive Order on Protecting Children from Environmental Risks Annual NEPA Planning Summaries What's New with Electronic NEPA Questionnaire Results Other Completed EIS-Related Documents

88

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2011 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2011 Welcome to the 68th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features an analysis of recent NEPA performance metrics. While we are pleased that EA cost and time metrics have improved, we are continuing to analyze how to apply lessons learned from the Recovery Act experiences more broadly. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles in this issue include: DOE NEPA Metrics Show Positive Results New DOE NEPA Website Design Federal Agencies Completing Recovery Act NEPA Work Environmental Reports To Streamline NEPA Analyses Uranium Leasing Program PEIS Scoping Meetings More Stakeholders Accept NEPA Documents Online

89

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2004 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2004 Welcome to the 38th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue we are continuing a multi-part examination of lessons learned from Lessons Learned. We invite your suggestions on how to improve the Lessons Learned program. Thank you for your continuing support. Included in this issue: New, Improved "Green Book" Is on the Way Modern Pit Facility Final EIS Delayed NNSA Withdraws FONSI for LANL Biosafety Lab BLM Programmatic EIS On Wind Energy Lesson Learned about Schedule and Teamwork CEQ Chair Emphasizes NEPA's "Productive Harmony" Goal Supporting Flexible Decisionmaking in Practice NEPA Champions Brief Congressional Staff

90

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2008 Welcome to the 57th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the September DOE NEPA Community Meeting as well as recent case studies. Articles in this issue include: NEPA Helps Us Make Good Decisions, Accomplish Missions, Secretary Bodman Says 2008 NEPA Meeting - Plenary Session General Counsel Emphasizes Value of NEPA Leadership Recognized Keys to Yucca NEPA Success Sabotage and Terrorism; Global Climate Change NEPAssist Demonstration DOJ Advice: "Show Your Work" NNSA NCO Offers Lessons CEQ Hot Topics 2008 NEPA Meeting - NCO Session The Essential Role of the NCO Advice from Counsel Applicants and the DOE NEPA Process DOE NEPA Metrics Update A Closer Look at the DOE NCOs - Round 2

91

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2013 In this issue, we highlight DOE's NEPA performance metrics, including a historical perspective. As DOE NEPA practitioners strive to control time and cost while maintaining quality, this most recent NEPA metrics analysis shows that overall performance generally appears to have remained stable, notwithstanding a substantial workload. Articles in this issue include: 10 Years of NEPA Metrics: 2003-2012 DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Historical Perspective on EIS Completion Times Responding to Comments NEPA Search Tool NAEP Abstracts, Nominations Document Managers and CORs Eating the NEPA Elephant Web-based Scoping Meeting A Summer with NEPA Stakeholders Directory EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter

92

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2010 Welcome to the 62nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we start a year-long observance of the 40th anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act. The occasion calls for celebration of NEPA's successes as well as reflection on opportunities for improvement. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: CEQ Celebrates NEPA at 40. . . and So Do We! DOE Launches Categorical Exclusion Database Celebrating 40 Years with NEPA CEQ Issues Draft NEPA Guidance CEQ NEPA Symposium Presidential Proclamation Reflections: Professor Mandelker NEPA Process Benefits DOE CEQ Cites DOE Examples on Climate Change, NEPA

93

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 Welcome to the 59th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the DOE NCO meeting and the NAEP annual conference, where streamlining the NEPA process for Recovery Act projects and consideration of climate change in NEPA documents were both addressed. We've begun to follow up on suggestions from the NCO meeting (below). Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE NEPA Compliance Officers Share Strategies 2009 NCO Meeting: Expediting a Quality NEPA Process Expedite Schedule and Maintain Quality Preparing Focused, Concise EAs

94

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2003 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2003 Welcome to the 35th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to include in this issue three new mini-guidance articles. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: Responding to Comments Is Work, But It Makes the NEPA Process Work DOE NEPA Meeting in July Mini-guidance: Multiple RODs Offer Flexibility Effective and Efficient EIS Distribution Keep the Public Informed When EIS Plans Change DOE Updates Public Participation Policy Observations on Annual NEPA Planning Summaries DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Guidance Issued Not Meeting CAA Requirements Can Cause Delays Floodplain and Wetland Regulations Update

95

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2001 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2001 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2001 Welcome to the 28th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This completes our seventh year of providing performance metrics, news, and guidance to the DOE NEPA Community. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Compliance Officers Consider Further Improvements NCO Meeting Federal/State/Tribal Coordination Forest Fire; Forest Preserved View From EPA Streamlining Approvals of Energy Projects NEPA Pilot Projects to Demonstrate Mediation DOE-wide NEPA Contracting Executive Order on Migratory Birds FERC Outreach for Natural Gas Approvals Life-Cycle Assessment for "Green" Projects

96

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2011 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2011 Welcome to the 67th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue showcases BPA's mitigation and monitoring activities and best practices of DOE Program and Field Offices for efficiently preparing NEPA documents, involving the public, and making a difference in the quality of environmental protection. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: Bonneville's "Balanced Scorecard" Approach to Mitigation, Monitoring, and Adaptive Management Make Reference Documents Available Online Promoting NEPA Transparency and Public Engagement "Sunshine Week" Symposium DOE Evaluating NEPA Compliance in Audits

97

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2003 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2003 Welcome to the 36th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the July 2003 NEPA Community Meeting in this issue. Also, please note that the cumulative index, a useful reference tool, is printed in this issue. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Included in this issue: DOE NEPA Community Gauges Progress In Its Continuing Pursuit of Excellence Floodplain and Wetland Regulations Effective September 26, 2003 NEPA Community Meeting Highlights Metrics Show Progress In Meeting Goals Getting from Here to There Lessons Learned Along the Way e-Government Approaches to EIS Distribution Procedures Evolving for Sensitive Information

98

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1999 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1999 Welcome to the 20th Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue includes a cumulative index for the past five years. Articles in this issue include: Proposed Arizona-Mexico Transmission Project Presents Challenges to NEPA Process and Analysis CEQ Memo on Non-Federal Cooperating Agencies EPA Guidance on Cumulative Impacts DOE NEPA Web Demonstration Publishing a Draft EIS on NEPA Web NAEP Conference Forest Services Decision Protocol DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update DOE Litigation Update Other Agency NEPA Cases EAs and EISs Completed this Quarter Other EIS-related Documents Third Quarter FY 1999 Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts Training Opportunities

99

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2000 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2000 Welcome to the 22nd Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS Helps DOE Preserve Unique Resources DOE Inspector General Report Questions Categorical Exclusion Application DOE Decides Disposition of Surplus Plutonium Interview with New NEPA Director at CEQ Transitions DOE Issues Decisions on Low-level and Mixed Low-level Waste Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's 25-Year History Considering Essential Fish Habitat in NEPA Reviews NEPA Guidance Updates Web Site of Interest DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Training Opportunities DOE Litigation Updates Other NEPA Cases EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter

100

55th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

08 1 08 1 Second Quarter FY 2008 June 2, 2008; Issue No. 55 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A September Meeting: Making NEPA Work for DOE Old NEPA Tools Still Work in a "Changing Climate" With the support of David Hill, DOE General Counsel, planning for the next DOE NEPA Community meeting is underway!

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

DOE Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE Lessons Learned Information Services Catches the Eye of Corporations and Educational Institutions

102

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2008 Welcome to the 56th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature EPA 's web-based tool for NEPA practitioners, as well as the new DOE NEPA Website. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: NEPAssist: EPA's New Tool for NEPA Practitioners Loan Guarantee Office Plans NEPA Reviews New DOE NEPA Website Launched Two USDA Agencies Revise NEPA Procedures NEST Environmental Indicators Program Santa Susana Area IV EIS: Making Your Voice Heard DOE Conducts Public Scoping for Transmission Line EA EPA Comments on Yucca Mountain Final EISs 2008 Stakeholders Directory Issued

103

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1998 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1998 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1998 Welcome to the second quarter FY 1998 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: NCO Meeting in DC The Role of the NCO Special Considerations in Applying Categorical Exclusions NEPA Training Anticipated DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Integrating NEPA with Other Reviews Advice from GC NRC Adopts DOE NEPA Documents at NEEL Alternative Dispute Resolution Clean Air Act Conformity Requirements Ecological Society Briefing NAPA Evaluates DOE NEPA Program NEPA Guidance Updates Litigation Updates Second Quarter FY98 Questionnaire Results EIS-related Documents Recent EIS Milestones EA Completion Times and Costs Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) More Documents & Publications ADR Revised Policy

104

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2010 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2010 Welcome to the 65th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we conclude our celebration of the 40th Anniversary of NEPA and look forward in the year ahead to implementing new tools from the Council on Environmental Quality and finalizing our NEPA rulemaking. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: Celebrating NEPA's Origins and Enduring Value CEQ Issues Categorical Exclusion Guidance NEPA 40th Anniversary Symposium NEPA Reviews Support Recovery Act Goals Recovery Act Makes 2010 a Busy Year for NEPA Best Practices Manual on Public Outreach Hanford Tank EIS Workshop

105

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 This issue features suggestions from experienced NEPA practitioners on ways to meet Secretary Chu's challenge to make better use of existing tools and integrate project management with NEPA compliance. Articles in this issue include: Secretary's Memorandum Key Principles OLC Training Suggestions from NETL Effective EIS Management Teams EPA Requires Electronic EIS Filing 2012 DOE NEPA Stakeholders Directory DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update GIS Tools for the NEPA Practitioner CEQ Cooperating Agency Report NEPA Office Summer Interns Transitions Appeals Court Upholds BELLA EA Using Social Media for NEPA NNSA Webcast SPD SEIS Hearing EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results

106

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2009 Welcome to the 58th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We have been very busy addressing our NEPA responsibilities arising from the recovery act as well as the new policies of the obama administration. In this issue of the Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR), we share ideas and experiences that will foster an improved and expedited NEPA compliance process. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Efficiency Essential to Recovery Plan NEPA Opportunities in a New Era of Openness Secretary Chu to DOE Employees: "Help Turn the Ship" Secretary Chu Pledges to Improve DOE Management New DOE-Wide NEPA Support Contracts! Sutley Brings Breadth of Government Experience to CEQ DOE Advances NEPA Process for Loan Guarantees

107

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2002 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2002 Welcome to the 32nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Much of this issue is devoted to reporting on the July DOE NEPA Community Meeting. Also featured is new NEPA-related guidance. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Community Meeting Addresses Reform Initiatives New Guidance Issued, More Underway Accident Analysis Guidance Agencies Discuss Indian Sacred Sites e-NEPA: Security Certification Needed Draft Information Quality Guidelines Litigation Updates DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Training Opportunities EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter NEPA Document Cost and Time Facts Recent EIS-Related Milestones What Worked and Didn't Work

108

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2003 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2003 Welcome to the 37th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue we are starting a multi-part examination of lessons learned from Lessons Learned. We invite your suggestions on how to improve the Lessons Learned program. Thank you for your continuing support. Articles included in this issue: What's Next? CEQ Seeks More Input on Task Force Recommendations What Have We Learned from Lessons Learned? BLM Preparing Wind Energy Programmatic EIS DOE Submits Cooperating Agency Report EA Measures Protect Wetland EIS to Re-review Transmission Lines DOE Web Site Turns 10! DOE Promotes NEPA 101 Goals New E.O. Addresses Historic Heritage Meeting on Protection of Indian Sacred Sites Summer Detail at the NEPA Office

109

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2007 Welcome to the 50th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance launched the Lessons Learned program in December 1994 to support continuous improvement in the NEPA process. The Office began by presenting cost and time metrics and "What Worked and What Didn't Work." Other features were soon introduced. As always, we hope you read all of LLQR, and we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articles included in this issue: Flexibility of NEPA Process Facilitates Decisions for Strategic Petroleum Reserve Expansion DOE Cooperating Agency Report to CEQ GNEP PEIS to Examine Nuclear Fuel Recycling Proposal

110

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 Welcome to the 55th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the recent NAEP conference, Changing Climates, thanks to our on-the-scene reporter Carolyn Osborne. There are also several articles related to global climate change and NEPA. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articles included in this issue: Old NEPA Tools Still Work in a "Changing Climate" September Meeting: Making NEPA Work for DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Scoping Underappreciated Provisions of the CEQ Regulations CEQ Interagency Work Groups Make Progress

111

77th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

77th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued 77th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued 77th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Issued December 3, 2013 - 3:18pm Addthis The 77th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process was issued on December 2, 2013. This issue of Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) examines positive outcomes of the NEPA process. Featured articles include a review by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance of nearly 400 excerpts from questionnaire responses published in LLQR during the past 10 years regarding the usefulness and effectiveness of the NEPA process. An overwhelming majority of the questionnaire responses describe positive outcomes and illustrate that we can produce high quality documents that enhance the Department's decisionmaking and help protect the environment.

112

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 Welcome to the 60th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the extraordinary support provided by our NCO volunteers and to introduce Scott Blake Harris, DOE General Counsel, and his plans for improving the DOE NEPA process. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE NCO Volunteers Lend a Hand To Expedite Recovery Act Projects DOE General Counsel Scott Blake Harris Aims To Improve the NEPA Review Process CEQ Report to Congress on Recovery Act DOE Grants NEPA Variances for Two Solicitations Introducing DOE's New General Counsel

113

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2003 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2003 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2003 Welcome to the 34th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the synergy between NEPA and the new DOE Order 450.1, Environmental Protection Program. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles included in this issue: New DOE Order Focuses on EMS, Supports Basic NEPA Principles Few Comments Received on Proposed Floodplain/Wetlands Rule Changes China's Environmental Impact Assessment Law DOI/Forest Service Proposed Categorical Exclusions Potential Resources for NEPA Practitioners A View from the Trenches Fossil Energy Launches EIS Process Improvement Team CEQ Updates EIS Distribution Saves Yucca Mountain Project $200,000

114

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2013 March 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2013 In this issue, we highlight the many benefits of NEPA to DOE, including improved planning, and better public involvement and environmental protection. Articles in this issue include: Sharing DOE's NEPA Success Stories Integrating NEPA and Project Planning Works Minimize EIS Printing Costs DOE Cooperating Agency Report Electronic Guidance Compendium Tribal Energy Resource CEQ IT Working Group Conferences DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Transitions EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts LLQR-2013-Q1.pdf More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2012 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September

115

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1995 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 1995 September 1995 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1995 This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between April 1 and June 30, 1995. It is based primarily on responses to the revised questionnaire that was provided for use during January 1995, and includes information on direct and indirect NEPA process costs and on total project costs. The report includes a Question and Answer section as well as guidance on selected topics. REPORT CONTENTS: NEPA Document Preparation Times NEPA Cost Data NEPA Document Content The Document Preparation Process Effectiveness of the NEPA Process Other Lessons Learned Lessons Learned Questions and Answers EISs Completed 3rd Quarter FY 1995 EAs Completed 3rd Quarter FY 1995

116

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 2006 June 2006 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2006 Welcome to the 47th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. The quality of our NEPA process affects the quality of DOE's decisions. Our appreciation goes out to all the NCOs and NEPA Document Managers who work every day to build quality into NEPA documents. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue include: Quality + Leadership = NEPA Success Security Reviews Needed for EISs on DOE NEPA Website NAEP Presents Award for NEPA 35 Conference FedCenter Website CRS Report on NEPA Streamlining Global Nuclear Energy Partnership EIS Sites Proposed for FutureGen Project Hanford EIS Scoping 2006 NAEP Conference Renewed Emphasis on EMS DOE Headquarters, Field Sites Celebrate Earth Day

117

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1997 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1997 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: CEQ Effectiveness Study CEQ Handbook on Cumulative Effects DOE Sites Enhancing Public Participation in EAs Stockpile Stewardship and Management ROD Issued EIS Distribution: Coordination with Congressional, Public and Intergovernmental Affairs EPA EIS Rating System Results of EA Quality Review DOE NEPA Web as Research Tool Litigation Updates DOE NEPA Process Data Misused GC to Provide Administrative Record Guidance Questions and Answers on Supplement Analyses First Quarter FY 1997 Lessons Learned Questionnaire Results, including EIS and EA Cost and Time reports Lessons Learned Quarterly Report

118

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009 Welcome to the 59th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the DOE NCO meeting and the NAEP annual conference, where streamlining the NEPA process for Recovery Act projects and consideration of climate change in NEPA documents were both addressed. We've begun to follow up on suggestions from the NCO meeting (below). Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE NEPA Compliance Officers Share Strategies 2009 NCO Meeting: Expediting a Quality NEPA Process Expedite Schedule and Maintain Quality Preparing Focused, Concise EAs Stakeholder Views on DOE's NEPA Process

119

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1998 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 1998 December 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1998 Welcome to the fourth quarter FY 1998 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: New and Improved NEPA Compliance Guide Issued in 2 Volumes NEPA Community Meeting in Las Vegas Managing Baseline Environmental Information for the Sandia Site-wide EIS Water Project Mini-guidance Regulatory Compliance and NEPA Procedures for an Environmental Critique and Synopsis, and a Supplement Analysis EPA Broadens Voluntary EIS Policy Historic Preservation Proposed Regulatory Revision Withdrawn Acting Chair at CEQ Training Opportunities Environmental Lessons Learned Seminars Litigation Updates DOE NEPA Community Members in Transition Annual NEPA Planning Summaries Performance-based Statements of Work

120

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2002 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2002 2002 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2002 Welcome to the 31st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. Articles in this issue include: Beverly Cook Balances NEPA Objectives: Both Flexibility and Consistency Are Needed DOE NEPA Community Meeting in July Expanding Online Access to DOE NEPA Documents Change in e-file Submittal Address Perspectives from a Town Official EH Priority: Guidance to Improve NEPA Implementation EPA Distributes Reminders on Filing an EIS Interior Department Welcomes Electronic EISs New on the NEPA Bookshelf Transitions Whats New from CEQ Training Opportunities Litigation Updates Proposals Due for New DOE-wide Contracts EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2000 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2000 Welcome to the 23rd quarterly report on lessons learned in theNEPA process. This issue features highlights from the May 2000 NEPA Compliance Officers Meeting. Also featured is an article on NEPA and the wildfire at Los Alamos. This is an unusually long issue, due simply to the abundance of information to be shared. I encourage you to read the report cover to cover and file it for future reference. Articles included in this issue: NEPA Compliance Officers Celebrate 10 Years of Progress: Lessons Learned from Seasoned NCOs NEPA and Clean Air Act Conformity Guidance Draft Environmental Justice, Accident Analysis Guidance e-NEPA: What's New and What's Next Los Alamos Site-wide EIS Analyzed Wildfire, Prompted Mitigation

122

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1995 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 1995 December 1995 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1995 This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between July 1 and September 30, 1995. It is based primarily on responses to the revised questionnaire that was provided for use during January 1995, and includes information on direct and indirect NEPA process costs and on total project costs. Included in this issue: NEPA Document Preparation Times NEPA Cost Date NEPA Document Content The Document Preparation Process Effectiveness of the NEPA Process Other Lessons Learned Feature Stories Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Supplemental EIS Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility EIS Updates from the Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance The Need for Consistency in Accident Analyses

123

56th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8-14-08 - 2:30 pm - DRAFT -September 2008 8-14-08 - 2:30 pm - DRAFT -September 2008 1 NEPA Lessons Learned 1 Third Quarter FY 2008 September 2, 2008; Issue No. 56 U.S. DeparTmeNT oF eNergY QUarTerlY reporT National environmental policy act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A 2008 Meeting of the DOE NEPA Community - Washington, DC Sep 24 - a.m. NEPA Compliance Officers Sep 24 - p.m. NEPA Training Sep 25 DOE NEPA Community Making NEPA Work for DOE - more on page 2 Imagine a web-based tool that could "cut" through various sets of environmental data and layer the results meaningfully on a geographic basis. For a given location, this tool could consolidate information on features specified by the user - for example, proximity to

124

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1996 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1996 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1996 Welcome to the newly-revised Quarterly Report of Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. In response to reader suggestions, we have expanded the scope of the report to provide a wider variety of NEPArelated information, and enhanced the format for better clarity and overall readability. This Quarterly Report includes: A NEPA SUCCESS STORY: Environmental Impact Statement for the Safe Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes NEPA lessons learned at the Hanford Site Mini-guidance on the preparation of EIS summaries, properly eliminating alternatives and impacts from detailed analysis, application of DOE NEPA regulations to procurement, and NEPA questions and answers Updates on the proposed amendments to DOE's NEPA regulations,

125

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1996 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1996 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1996 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report of Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This Quarterly Report includes: March 1996 NEPA Contracting Workshop: Do it Right the First Time EIS Coordination between Headquarters and Field Bounding Analysis in DOE NEPA Documents Questions and Answers on EIS References Suggestions from a NEPA Document Manager (Hanford K-Basins Spent Fuel EIS) Toll-Free Phone for Public Involvement Video Conferencing for Public Hearings Alternative Dispute Resolution and the NEPA Process Litigation Updates Comments on Proposed Amendments to DOE NEPA Regulations Second quarter FY 1996 Lessons Learned Questionnaire results,including EIS and EA cost and time reports Analysis of recent trends in costs and time

126

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2009 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2009 Welcome to the 61st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we highlight many of the ways that the NEPA process furthers transparency in government decisionmaking. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE Begins Online Posting of Categorical Exclusion Determinations CEQ Reports Timely NEPA Reviews for Recovery Act Comprehensive Draft EIS for Hanford Issued Y-12 Public Hearings Show Different Perspectives Revised Background Radiation Exposure Estimates Electronic CX Determination Form New Executive Order on Greenhouse Gases, Sustainability BPA Environmental Leadership Award

127

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report 1st Quarter FY 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Success Stories: Success Stories: Articles from Department of Energy NEPA Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports 1996 Mar Hanford Tanks Public participation in NEPA process resulted in changes to the scope of the proposed project. The NEPA process resulted in enforceable mitigation commitments. 1997 Dec NPR Sale The NEPA process resulted in enforceable mitigation commitments for biological and cultural resources. 1999 Mar SPR Pipeline Integrating NEPA and the Section 404 permit processes proved efficient and resulted in mitigation commitments. 1999 Jun LANL Habitat Plan The NEPA process resulted in a site-wide habitat management plan (reducing future need for biological assessments), geographic information system (reference for future project analyses), and endangered species protection.

128

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1999 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1999 March 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1999 Welcome to the first quarter FY 1999 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: Dr. David Michaels DOEs New Leader for Environment, Safety and Health Society Promotes Lessons Learned Exchange at DOE Partnering Facilitates SPR Pipeline EA Mini-guidance An EIS Needs an Index When We Dont Know, Say So Extending Public Comment Periods Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to Issue New Section 106 Regulations DOE -wide NEPA Contracts Litigation Updates Executive Order Issued on Invasive Species Lessons Learned Quarterly Report (LLQR) More Documents & Publications Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1998 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2002

129

Managing NEPA at the Department of Energy | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Energy. G-Oth-ManagingNEPADOE.pdf More Documents & Publications NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996) Lessons Learned Quarterly...

130

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1997 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1997 1997 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1997 Welcome to the fourth quarter FY 1997 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles in this issue include: NEPA Review Adds Value to Proposed Sale of Naval Petroleum Reserve INEEL EIS: New Approaches to Scoping CEQ Environmental Justice Guidance Strategies for EIS Savings ISO 14000 and NEPA Recent EIS Milestones NAEP NEPA Recommendations New National Environmental Training Office Beneficial Landscaping Practices Draft CEQ Guidance on Global Climate Change Transitions DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Transboundary Environmental Impacts Annual NEPA Planning Summaries Recent NEPA Guidance Public Involvement: If You Don't Know Where You're Going Litigation Updates Questionnaire Results EIS-related Documents

131

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2000 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 2000 September 2000 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2000 Welcome to the 24th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Note that this issue includes a cumulative index covering the past six years of reports. Articles included in this issue: Emergency NEPA Procedures Invoked for Actions Taken after Los Alamos Fire DOE Programs Win NAEP Awards U.S. Forest Service Receives Massive Response Interim DOE Technical Standard on Biota Doses Draft Guidelines for Environmental Review of Trade e-NEPA: Progress Made in Adding NEPA Documents Mini-Guidance: Affected Environment and No Action Alternative Label an EA for Pre-Approval Review Using Significant Digits NEPA Guidance Updates New on the NEPA Bookshelf Transitions DOE-Wide NEPA Contract Updates

132

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 1, 1995 March 1, 1995 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1995 This second quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between October 1 and December 31, 1994. It is based on responses to the revised questionnaire that was provided for use during Janua~ 1995, and includes information on direct and indirect NEPA process costs and on total project costs. Additionally, the report includes a feature story on lessons learned during preparation of the F-Canyon Plutonium Solutions Environmental Impact Statement. December 1, 1994 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 1994 On August 12, 1994 the Office of NEPA Oversight distributed an interim/draft lessons learned questionnaire to NEPA contacts to be used for reporting on environmental impact statements and environmental assessments

133

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2004 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2004 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2004 The National Environmental Policy Act turns 35 on January 1, 2005! This landmark legislation altered the Federal decisionmaking process. In this issue of LLQR, Ray Berube, retired Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment, looks back at how NEPA compliance procedures have evolved at DOE. Our lead article looks at how the Internet is becoming an increasingly useful NEPA tool. We hope you will find helpful suggestions throughout LLQR on how we can continue to improve and modernize NEPA implementation, and, as always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: Putting the Web to Work for NEPA Case Studies Address NEPA Section 101

134

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2008 Welcome to the 55th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the recent NAEP conference, Changing Climates, thanks to our on-the-scene reporter Carolyn Osborne. There are also several articles related to global climate change and NEPA. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articles included in this issue: Old NEPA Tools Still Work in a "Changing Climate" September Meeting: Making NEPA Work for DOE Strategic Petroleum Reserve Scoping Underappreciated Provisions of the CEQ Regulations CEQ Interagency Work Groups Make Progress CEQ Highlights Innovative NEPA Procedures

135

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2005 Welcome to the 44th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue completes our 11th year publishing LLQR, and as we go to press, we're preparing to mark an even more impressive milestone - our observance of the 35th anniversary of NEPA. We're busily working on all the details that will make this a great conference. We hope to see YOU there. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: Secretary Bodman on DOE's NEPA 35th Anniversary DOE Supports Interagency NEPA Modernization Work Groups Energy Policy Act Affects DOE NEPA Activities CEQ Cumulative Effects Guidance DOE Supplement Analysis Guidance 2005 Stakeholders Directory DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update

136

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2012 The need for timely preparation of quality EISs has not lessened since DOE initiated the NEPA Lessons Learned program in 1994. This issue provides advice on developing and maintaining EIS schedules from some of the Department's most experienced NEPA practitioners and highlights guidance and GIS tools that can help DOE prepare NEPA documents more efficiently. Articles in this issue include: How to Manage an EIS Schedule Successfully EPA Electronic Filing Scientific Integrity CEQ NEPA Efficiency Guidance Online Mapping Tools Keeping Track of NEPA Documents NAEP Conference Report Transitions 2013 NAEP Conference Announcement DOE-Wide NEPA Contracts Update EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts

137

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2006 Welcome to the 46th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. DOE's senior managers play a vital role in NEPA implementation as evidenced by the settlement of Hanford NEPA litigation. Their participation in every EIS is important to ensure the scope and schedule support DOE's needs, as shown by an analysis of EIS metrics in this issue. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: Collaboration Yields Win-Win Solution at Hanford DOE Applies "Alternative NEPA Arrangements" After Ordering Coal Power Plant to Operate Congressional NEPA Task Force Staff Initial Report Quality Assurance in NEPA Documents NAEP Annual Conference DOE Solicits Comments on FutureGen

138

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 2013 June 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2013 In this issue, we highlight recent guidance by the Council on Environmental Quality and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to promote better integration of NEPA and Section 106 reviews and on the Federal Highway Administration's Every Day Counts initiative to better integrate planning and NEPA. Articles in this issue include: Integrating NEPA and NHPA Section 106 ACHP Extension of Programmatic Agreements Sutley Testifies on Importance of NEPA Every Day Counts at FHWA Guide for Public-Private Projects Earth Day at DOE GAO: Consider Climate Change Risks NAEP 2012 NEPA Report NAEP 2014 Conference Announcement NAEP Environmental Awards CEQ IT Working Group NEPA-CEQA Handbook in Preparation

139

Early Lessons Learned  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned Deploying a 100Gbps Network Steve Cotter Dept Head, Energy Sciences Network May 4, 2011 Enterprise Innovation Symposium Atlanta, GA Lawrence Berkeley National...

140

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 Welcome to the 53rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Many in the Department's NEPA Community were called on to give extraordinary time and resources to the preparation of key EISs issued recently and highlighted in this LLQR. We anticipate a busy 2008 as well. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Included in this issue: Multiple, Complex EISs Support DOE Missions; What Will the New Year Bring? Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in DOE NEPA Documents Is Evolving OMB and OSTP Issue Risk Analysis Principles Feature: Key EISs Yucca Mountain EISs Clean Coal EISs Western Energy Corridors Programmatic EIS FONSI Not a Foregone Conclusion

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2009 Welcome to the 60th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to feature the extraordinary support provided by our NCO volunteers and to introduce Scott Blake Harris, DOE General Counsel, and his plans for improving the DOE NEPA process. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE NCO Volunteers Lend a Hand To Expedite Recovery Act Projects DOE General Counsel Scott Blake Harris Aims To Improve the NEPA Review Process CEQ Report to Congress on Recovery Act DOE Grants NEPA Variances for Two Solicitations Introducing DOE's New General Counsel Mercury Storage EIS Under Way

142

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2011 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2011 Welcome to the 66th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue focuses on the Administration's new NEPA guidance and related initiatives - on scientific integrity, regulatory improvement, mitigation and monitoring, and filing EISs - and DOE's proposal to modernize its NEPA regulations. Thank you for your continuing support of the Lessons Learned program. As always, we welcome your suggestions for improvement. Articles included in this issue: DOE Proposes Revisions to Its NEPA Rule To Modernize Categorical Exclusions EPA Issues EIS Filing Guidance Executive Order Seeks To Improve Regulations CEQ Mitigation and Monitoring Guidance White House Guidance on Scientific Integrity Cooperating Agency Report to CEQ

143

Cycle Track Lessons Learned  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Cycle Track Lessons Learned #12;Presentation Overview · Bicycling trends · Cycle track lessons learned · What is a "Cycle track"? · Essential design elements of cycle tracks Separation Width Crossing driveways & low-volume streets Signalized intersections #12;Trend in kilometers cycled per year

Bertini, Robert L.

144

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1996 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1996 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 1996 Welcome again to the Quarterly Report on Lessons Learned in the NEPA process. This report includes: Defense Programs NCO Fosters Teamwork through Meetings Internal Scoping at Richland Visual Excellence Responding to Comments on DOE EISs Improving Comment Resolution with EPA EPA Commends DOE for "Model" Pollution Prevention Analysis Litigation Updates 1996 Federal Environmental Quality Award Winners: USACE and MMS Amended Rule Streamlines DOE NEPA Process Book Review: Environmental Impact Assessment Third quarter FY 1996 Lessons Learned Questionnaire results, including EIS and EA cost and time reports, and analysis models and codes used in DOE EAs and EISs

145

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1999 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1999 1999 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1999 Welcome to the second quarter FY 1999 Quarterly Report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In addition to the articles beginning on page 1, this issue includes: Consolidated Decision Ends Tritium Trilogy Tale NEPA and Habitat Management Plan: Environmental Synergy Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Revises Section 106 Regulations Mini-guidance Plain Language for NEPA Federal Register Notices Distributing a Record of Decision A Helpful Hint for EIS Glossaries New Books for the NEPA Practitioners Bookshelf DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Court Allows WIPP to Open Transitions at the CEQ EH Electronic Publishing Standards and Guidelines Training Opportunities Documents Issued, Second Quarter FY 1999 Second Quarter FY 1999 Questionnaire Results

146

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2006 Welcome to the 48th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We remember Lynton Caldwell, who promoted a vision of productive harmony - a balance of the interests of the environment and human society. The NEPA process remains a useful tool for pursuing that vision by integrating environmental analysis into the decisionmaking process. With this issue, we have completed 12 years of LLQR, with an emphasis on continuous improvement. As always, we welcome your suggestions. Articles included in this issue: Court Rejects Challenges to Yucca EIS, Transportation Plan Lynton Caldwell, "Father of NEPA," 1914-2006 Congressional NEPA Task Force Staff Final Report CEQ Work Groups Developing NEPA Guidance

147

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, September 2012 This issue features suggestions from experienced NEPA practitioners on ways to meet Secretary Chu's challenge to make better use of existing tools and integrate project management with NEPA compliance. Articles in this issue include: Secretary's Memorandum Key Principles OLC Training Suggestions from NETL Effective EIS Management Teams EPA Requires Electronic EIS Filing 2012 DOE NEPA Stakeholders Directory DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update GIS Tools for the NEPA Practitioner CEQ Cooperating Agency Report NEPA Office Summer Interns Transitions Appeals Court Upholds BELLA EA Using Social Media for NEPA NNSA Webcast SPD SEIS Hearing EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Questionnaire Results Cost and Time Facts LLQR-2012-Q3.pdf

148

Lessons Learned Database | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Lessons Learned Database Login Welcome to the Lessons Learned site, the premier Web tool for online information sharing regarding Lessons Learned issues. Please login to...

149

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 Welcome to the 49th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we feature the initiation of three significant EISs: the Complex 2030 Supplemental Programmatic EIS, the Supplemental Yucca Mountain Repository EIS, and the expanded Yucca Mountain Rail EIS. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: NNSA Pursues Complex 2030 Vision Through Supplemental Programmatic EIS Scoping Process Underway for Two Yucca Mountain EISs Address Sabotage and Terrorism in EISs and EAs Special Environmental Analysis for Emergency Actions CEQ Work Groups Develop NEPA Guidance EIS Study Emphasizes Need for Quality and Clarity

150

57th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2008  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 2008 December 2008 1 NEPA Lessons Learned 10-31-2008 - 2:30 pm - DRAFT -December 2008 1 NEPA Helps Us Make Good Decisions, Accomplish Missions, Secretary Bodman Says Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman, speaking at the plenary session of the DOE NEPA Community Meeting on September 25, 2008, noted the important contributions of the NEPA process to achieving DOE missions and expressed his appreciation to those who "make NEPA work for DOE." "Of course, we must comply with the law," he said, "both because it is the right thing to do and because we cannot move forward when litigation stops us in our tracks. But even more significantly, NEPA helps us make good decisions." Many

151

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2001 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2001 Welcome to the 27th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Articles included in this issue: DOE Issues Supplement to Yucca Mountain Draft EIS Los Alamos Project Guided by MAP BPAs Readers Guide Cultural, Tribal, and Historic Updates Secretarial Policy on Cultural Resources Working with Indian Tribal Nations Historic Preservation Final Regulations Can Pilot Projects, Dispute Resolution Techniques Improve NEPA Implementation? DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update Mini-guidance: DOE Public Reading Rooms Drafting Federal Register Notices Potential NEPA Implications of a National Energy Policy Nominee for CEQ Transitions Training Opportunities EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Recent EIS Milestones Cost and Time Facts

152

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2005 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2005 March 2005 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2005 Welcome to the 42nd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. We are pleased to introduce our new Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health. John Spitaleri Shaw is a strong supporter of good NEPA compliance, as evidenced during our interview with him and in his February 16, 2005, memorandum, both of which are summarized in this issue. Articles included in this issue: New Assistant Secretary Shaw Promotes NEPA as Essential to Energy Mission and Goals EH Brief on Consultation with Native Americans Updated Green Book Issued New Forest Service Regulations EIS Distribution Guidance in Preparation CEQ Revises Cooperating Agency Reporting IAIA Conference NAEP Conference Transitions DOE-wide NEPA Contracts Update

153

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; March 3, 2003; Issue No. 34; First Quarter FY 2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Lear Lessons Lear ned March 2003 1 wealth of information that informs the NEPA process, he explained. Mr. Greczmiel told the workshop audience that the CEQ NEPA Task Force, which he directs, has looked at ways EMS could improve NEPA implementation. An EMS can improve relations with local communities, especially with regulators, who appreciate the Federal effort to address environmental issues systematically, he said. Another benefit of an EMS, he noted, is that it can provide methods for following up NEPA's predictive analysis. National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT First Quarter FY 2003 March 3, 2003; Issue No. 34 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS New DOE Order Focuses on EMS, Supports Basic NEPA Principles Few Comments Received on Proposed

154

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2011 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2011 This issue celebrates the revision of DOE's NEPA regulations, which became effective on November 14, 2011. The culmination of a 2-year rulemaking process, the regulations establish 20 new categorical exclusions and revise other provisions to promote efficiency and transparency. Articles in this issue include: DOE Updates NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency and Transparency EPA Web Resource on EJ and NEPA DOE NEPA Website Tools Informal Public Involvement at Livermore Can We Issue a ROD on Monday? Keep the Public Informed When EIS Plans Change Final CEQ Recovery Act Report to Congress CEQ Selects Pilot Projects to Improve NEPA Efficiency Fugitive Emissions Working Group Wins Award Guidance on Health Impact Assessment

155

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2007 Welcome to the 51st quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue features collaboration as a key element of a successful NEPA process. Related articles discuss approaches to and benefits of collaboration and illustrate various applications. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Collaborating to Cultivate a Shared Vision Focus on Collaboration DOI Dialogues Bring Agencies Together Draft CEQ Collaboration Handbook MUSIC Uses Joint Fact Finding Environmental Justice Conference Environmental Conflict Resolution Training Nye County to Cooperate in Yucca SEIS Corps Works with Public for Hurricane Protection Public Input Sought on FutureGen Draft EIS Environmental Document Facilitates NEPA Reviews

156

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2013 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 2013 December 2013 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2013 Welcome to the 77th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. This issue reminds us that, through teamwork and dedication by DOE's NEPA community, we can produce high quality documents that enhance the Department's decisionmaking and help protect the environment. Articles in this issue include: Was Your NEPA Process Just One More Hurdle, or Did It Make a Difference? Bonneville Participates in Regional Infrastructure Team EPA EIS Mapper Tool Online Tribal Training Key Reference Document on Climate Change Golden Field Office Relocates Golden FONSI Template EPA Ratings of DOE Draft EISs New Migratory Bird MOU Jim Daniel To Retire Transitions EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Cost and Time Facts

157

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2007 Welcome to the 53rd quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. Many in the Department's NEPA Community were called on to give extraordinary time and resources to the preparation of key EISs issued recently and highlighted in this LLQR. We anticipate a busy 2008 as well. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Included in this issue: Multiple, Complex EISs Support DOE Missions; What Will the New Year Bring? Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in DOE NEPA Documents Is Evolving OMB and OSTP Issue Risk Analysis Principles Feature: Key EISs Yucca Mountain EISs Clean Coal EISs Western Energy Corridors Programmatic EIS FONSI Not a Foregone Conclusion CEQ's Collaboration Handbook

158

Environment/Health/Safety (EHS): Lessons Learned  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned Lessons Learned Lessons Home Lessons Learned Database Lessons Learned The Berkeley Lab Lessons Learned Program is managed by the Office of Contract Assurance (OCA). It was developed to help the Laboratory community learn from our mistakes (and the mistakes of others) so that we don't repeat them. Through various sources, we identify events such as accidents, mishaps and near misses and translate them into corrective actions to prevent their recurrence. The ultimate goal of the Lessons Learned Program is to continually improve our performance on an ongoing basis. This is one of the central tenets of the Laboratory's assurance program. We use several different sources of information for our Lessons Learned Program. These include: The Lessons Learned database. Use the Lessons Learned database to enter Lessons Learned and Best Practices, and to view the Lessons Learned Library.

159

NEPA Lessons Learned June 2011 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 1 1 Like all Federal agencies, BPA must comply with Executive Order (E.O.) 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, which requires the implementation of an environmental management system (EMS). BPA's Environmental Management System Handbook (2009) lays out a "Balanced Scorecard Management System," implemented throughout BPA as our EMS. An independent (i.e., non-BPA)

160

Utility Energy Service Contracts - Lessons Learned  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Service Contracts-Lessons Learned Service Contracts-Lessons Learned Utility Energy Services Contracts Lessons Learned Water Conservation Negotiating Financing Lowering Finance Rates Utility Energy Service Contracts-Lessons Learned 2 -- FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................3 Financing Utility Energy Services Contracts ..........................................................................................................................3 Understanding Financing Factors ...........................................................................................................................................3

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Utility Energy Service Contracts - Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Service Contracts-Lessons Learned Service Contracts-Lessons Learned Utility Energy Services Contracts Lessons Learned Water Conservation Negotiating Financing Lowering Finance Rates Utility Energy Service Contracts-Lessons Learned 2 -- FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................3 Financing Utility Energy Services Contracts ..........................................................................................................................3 Understanding Financing Factors ...........................................................................................................................................3

162

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Issue No. 32; Third Quarter FY 2002 (September 3, 2002)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 2002 September 2002 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Third Quarter FY 2002 September 3, 2002; Issue No. 32 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS continued on page 3 NEPA Community Meeting Addresses Reform Initiatives James Connaughton, CEQ Chair, urged linking NEPA with EMS. Challenged to “Reform and Re-energize NEPA Implementation,” more than 150 members of the DOE NEPA Community convened in Washington, DC, on July 16 and 17, 2002, at the annual meeting sponsored by the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance. Highlights of the meeting included presentations by James Connaughton, Chair, Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), and the senior environmental advisor to the President; and Robert Card, Under Secretary for Energy,

163

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; Fourth Quarter FY 2002; December 2, 2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2002 December 2, 2002; Issue No. 33 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS CEQ Asks How to Improve NEPA Implementation; Responses Vary Widely continued on page 5 In response to questions from the Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ's) NEPA Task Force, Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies, environmental and business groups, and individual citizens have weighed in during the past few months with opinions on how to improve NEPA implementation. CEQ also sought and received examples of best practices and case studies. Collectively, the comments cover nearly every aspect of NEPA implementation. They range from strong support for the value of the NEPA process to sharp criticism,

164

Lessons Learned Database | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Database Lessons Learned Database Lessons Learned Database The DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Database provides a central clearinghouse that allows ready access to and communication about collected information on a timely, unimpeded basis by all DOE elements. The database is used to collect and share lessons learned and best practices pertaining to all DOE activities Lessons Learned Database Login Welcome to the Lessons Learned site, the premier Web tool for online information sharing regarding Lessons Learned issues. Please login to access your profile, search the database, or submit a new Lesson Learned. User Log In: If you have already received your log in credentials for the DOE Lessons Learned system click here to log in. Create New Account: We do not allow anonymous access to this site. You must register for an

165

St. Louis FUSRAP Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to present lessons learned from fours years' experience conducting Remedial Investigation and Remedial Action activities at the St. Louis Downtown Site (SLDS) under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Many FUSRAP sites are experiencing challenges conducting Remedial Actions within forecasted volume and budget estimates. The St. Louis FUSRAP lessons learned provide insight to options for cost effective remediation at FUSRAP sites. The lessons learned are focused on project planning (budget and schedule), investigation, design, and construction.

Eberlin, J.; Williams, D.; Mueller, D.

2003-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

166

Better Buildings Residential Network: Lessons Learned: Peer Exchange...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Network: Lessons Learned: Peer Exchange Calls Better Buildings Residential Network: Lessons Learned: Peer Exchange Calls Better Buildings Residential Network: Lessons Learned: Peer...

167

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 2006 December 2006 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2006 Welcome to the 49th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. In this issue, we feature the initiation of three significant EISs: the Complex 2030 Supplemental Programmatic EIS, the Supplemental Yucca Mountain Repository EIS, and the expanded Yucca Mountain Rail EIS. As always, we welcome your suggestions for continuous improvement. Articles included in this issue: NNSA Pursues Complex 2030 Vision Through Supplemental Programmatic EIS Scoping Process Underway for Two Yucca Mountain EISs Address Sabotage and Terrorism in EISs and EAs Special Environmental Analysis for Emergency Actions CEQ Work Groups Develop NEPA Guidance EIS Study Emphasizes Need for Quality and Clarity Transitions

168

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 Welcome to the 54th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. As noted in articles on recently issued DOE EISs (Complex Transformation, Yucca Mountain Repository and Railroad, and Western Energy Corridors), DOE has received and is responding to extensive public comment. This issue also pays tribute to two women who have made extraordinary contributions to NEPA implementation. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articles included in this issue: Programmatic EIS on Nuclear Weapons Complex Draws National Interest, Many Comments Restructured Approach to FutureGen Yucca Mountain Final EISs on Track Enriched Uranium Disposition Supplement Analysis DOE 2007 Cooperating Agency Report

169

Lessons Learned | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Ecosystem Management Team » Lessons Learned Services » Ecosystem Management Team » Lessons Learned Lessons Learned Ecosystem Managment February 28, 2008 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance at Rocky Flats: Early Experiences and Lessons Learned February 28, 2008 The Use of Ecological Restoration Principles To Achieve Remedy Protection at the Fernald Preserve and Weldon Spring Sites December 31, 2007 Revegetation of the Rocky Flats Site December 31, 2007 Changes in Vegetation at the Monticello, Utah, Disposal Site January 31, 2007 Study of Factors Affecting Shrub Establishment on the Monticello, Utah, Disposal Cell Cover June 5, 2006 Smooth Brome Monitoring at Rocky Flats-2005 Results December 31, 2002 Landfill Cover Revegetation at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site December 31, 2001 Erosion Control and Revegetation at DOE's Lowman Disposal Site, Lowman,

170

Lessons Learned Integrating COTS into Systems  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper presents lessons learned by the author over fifteen years of experience integrating COTS software into systems at The Boeing Company. One key lesson has been to...

Thomas G. Baker

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

54th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

54th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 54th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 54th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2008 Welcome to the 54th quarterly report on lessons learned in the NEPA process. As noted in articles on recently issued DOE EISs (Complex Transformation, Yucca Mountain Repository and Railroad, and Western Energy Corridors), DOE has received and is responding to extensive public comment. This issue also pays tribute to two women who have made extraordinary contributions to NEPA implementation. As always, we welcome your suggestions for further improvement. Articled included in this issue: Restructured Approach to FutureGen Yucca Mountain Final EISs on Track Highly Enriched Uranium Disposition Supplement Analysis DOE 2007 Cooperating Agency Report CEQ Citizen's Guide Enhances Public Involvement

172

Integrated Biorefinery Lessons Learned and Best Practices  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Breakout Session 1DBuilding Market Confidence and Understanding I: Integrated Biorefinery (Lessons Learned and Best Practices) Integrated Biorefinery Lessons Learned and Best Practices Glenn Doyle, Technology Manager, Bioenergy Technologies Office, U.S. Department of Energy

173

DOE Lessons Learned | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

All DOE sites are encouraged to provide their Lessons Learned to the DOE Community via a Web-based form available on the DOE Lessons Learned database registration page. NOTE:...

174

EM Recovery Act Lessons Learned (Olinger)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation slides from EM ARRA Best Practices and Lessons Learned WorkshopWaste Management SymposiumPhoenix, AZMarch 1, 2012.

175

EM Recovery Act Lessons Learned (Johnson)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation slides from EM ARRA Best Practices and Lessons Learned WorkshopWaste Management SymposiumPhoenix, AZMarch 1, 2012.

176

EM Recovery Act Lessons Learned (Sites)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation slides from EM ARRA Best Practices and Lessons Learned WorkshopWaste Management SymposiumPhoenix, AZMarch 1, 2012.

177

Lessons Learned from Safety Events  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hydrogen Incident Reporting and Lessons Learned website (www.h2incidents.org) was launched in 2006 as a database-driven resource for sharing lessons learned from hydrogen-related safety events to raise safety awareness and encourage knowledge-sharing. The development of this database, its first uses and subsequent enhancements have been described at the Second and Third International Conferences on Hydrogen Safety. [1,2] Since 2009, continuing work has not only highlighted the value of safety lessons learned, but enhanced how the database provides access to another safety knowledge tool, Hydrogen Safety Best Practices (http://h2bestpractices.org). Collaborations with the International Energy Agency (IEA) Hydrogen Implementing Agreement (HIA) Task 19 Hydrogen Safety and others have enabled the database to capture safety event learnings from around the world. This paper updates recent progress, highlights the new Lessons Learned Corner as one means for knowledge-sharing and examines the broader potential for collecting, analyzing and using safety event information.

Weiner, Steven C.; Fassbender, Linda L.

2012-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

178

Field observations and lessons learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This presentation outlines observations and lessons learned from the Megaports program. It provides: (1) details of field and technical observations collected during LANL field activities at ports around the world and details of observations collected during radiation detections system testing at Los Alamos National Laboratory; (2) provides suggestions for improvement and efficiency; and (3) discusses possible program execution changes for more effective operations.

Nielsen, Joh B [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach: Lessons Learned  

Wind Powering America (EERE)

Lessons Learned Lessons Learned Wind Powering America's lessons learned series highlights multiple aspects of the wind industry, giving participants an opportunity to share their experience with interested parties. Here you will find lessons learned for 2013. August 12, 2013 Re-Powering a Wind Farm: Wind Powering America Lessons Learned Neil Habig, senior developer at Iberdrola Renewables; Don Bain, president of Aeropower Services; and Mark Jacobson, senior project leader at NREL and former director of business development at Invenergy LLC share the following lessons learned regarding the re-powering of wind farms. July 01, 2013 KidWind Project and Wind Education in the Classroom: Wind Powering America Lessons Learned Dan Whisler, a 29-year environmental science instructor at Sterling High

180

Quality Assurance Lessons Learned 2010  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Quality Council Lessons Learned Quality Council Lessons Learned Vendor Supplier Deficiencies: Myers Drum Concerns at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) The Office of Packaging and Transportation, in the DOE Office of Environmental Management, issued a Safety Alert in January 12, 2010, (Issue Number: DOE/OPT/SA-01) alerting the DOE packaging and transportation community about potential failure associated with 55 and 30-gallon carbon steel drum closure rings. On January 13, 2010, HSS issued a Data Collection Sheet (DCS) to all DOE sites citing the concerns as well. Those concerns arose while contractors were performing receipt inspections on several lots of drums and drum rings received at the Hanford site and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). It was determined that the drum

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Lessons learned from RTG programs  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During the Cassini Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG) program, the heritage RTG design was reviewed and modified to incorporate lessons learned. Design changes were made both to resolve problems as they occurred and to correct difficulties noted in earlier missions. Topics addressed in this paper included problems experienced previously at the launch facility in attaching the pressure relief device to the generators, and the open circuit conditions that occurred at times in the resistance temperature device wiring harness. Also discussed is a problem caused by mistakes in software configuration management. How lessons learned refined the RTG design and integration with the spacecraft are discussed and the adopted solutions are described. {copyright} {ital 1998 Lockheed Martin Missles and Space, reproduced with permission.}

Reinstrom, R.M.; Cockfield, R.D. [Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space, P.O. Box 8555, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 (United States)

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

NEPA Success Stories and Benefits | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Success Stories and Benefits NEPA Success Stories and Benefits NEPA Success Stories and Benefits September 16, 2013 Examples of Benefits from the NEPA process for ARRA funded activities Efforts to implement the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) include ensuring, and reporting on, timely NEPA reviews prepared in support of projects and activities funded under major provisions of ARRA. In addition to reporting on the status of the NEPA environmental reviews, agencies also report on the benefits of NEPA. September 16, 2013 NEPA Success Stories: Celebrating 40 Years of Transparency and Open Government NEPA Success Stories: Celebrating 40 Years of Transparency and Open Government, Environmental Law Institute, 2010. February 27, 2013 NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports

183

Lessons Learned: Devolping Thermochemical Cycles for Solar Heat...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Lessons Learned: Devolping Thermochemical Cycles for Solar Heat Storage Applications Lessons Learned: Devolping Thermochemical Cycles for Solar Heat Storage Applications This...

184

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report, Department of Energy...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

January 2005 Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report, Department of Energy - January 2005 January 2005 Lessons Learned Report Electrical Safety During Excavation and...

185

Alternative Fuels Lessons Learned Workshop | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Alternative Fuels Lessons Learned Workshop Alternative Fuels Lessons Learned Workshop Presentation by NREL's Margo Melendez at the 2010 - 2025 Scenario Analysis for Hydrogen Fuel...

186

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 17, 2014 EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 15, 2014 EIS-0460: Record of Decision

187

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 10, 2014 EIS-0488: FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 10, 2014

188

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report; March 3, 2003; Issue No. 34...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Retrieval, Treatment, and Disposal of Tank Wastes and Closure of Single-Shell Tanks at the Hanford Site L L NEPA Lessons Lear ned March 2003 15 Training Opportunities...

189

Promotion of Wind Energy: Lessons Learned from International...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

gefdocumentspublicationswindpowerweb.pdf Equivalent URI: cleanenergysolutions.orgcontentpromotion-wind-energy-lessons-learned Language: English Policies: "Deployment...

190

FEMP Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Federal Agency ESPC...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FEMP Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Federal Agency ESPC Projects Contents 1. Introduction ......

191

Implementing US Department of Energy lessons learned programs. Volume 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE Lessons Learned Handbook is a two-volume publication developed to supplement the DOE Lessons Learned Standard (DOE-STD-7501-95) with information that will organizations in developing or improving their lessons learned programs. Volume 1 includes greater detail than the Standard in areas such as identification and documentation of lessons learned; it also contains sections on specific processes such as training and performance measurement. Volume 2 (this document) contains examples of program documents developed by existing lessons learned programs as well as communications material, functional categories, transmittal documents, sources of professional and industry lessons learned, and frequently asked questions about the Lessons Learned List Service.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

192

http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/process/ll/95q3.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3RD 3RD QUARTER FY 1995 Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy September 1, 1995 INTRODUCTION To foster continuing improvement of the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA, issued June 13, 1994, requires the Office of Environment, Safety and Health to solicit comments on lessons learned in the process of completing NEPA documents from the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Officer, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement (EIS) and environmental assessment (EA), and to distribute a quarterly summary to all NEPA Compliance Officers and NEPA Document Managers. This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between April 1 and June

193

http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/process/ll/95q4.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4TH 4TH QUARTER FY 1995 Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy December 1, 1995 INTRODUCTION To foster continuing improvement of the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA, issued June 13, 1994, requires the Office of Environment, Safety and Health to solicit comments on lessons learned in the process of completing NEPA documents from the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Officer, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement (EIS) and environmental assessment (EA), and to distribute a quarterly summary to all NEPA Compliance Officers and NEPA Document Managers. This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between July 1 and

194

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 2002, Issue No. 30, First Quarter FY 2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT First Quarter FY 2002 March 1, 2002; Issue No. 30 LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS CEQ Guidance Encourages Agency Cooperation DOE Experience Is Generally Positive Better cooperation and coordination – always a good idea in the NEPA process – is given an extra boost by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in new guidance. James Connaughton, CEQ Chair, in a January 30, 2002, letter to Heads of Federal Agencies, underscores the benefits of enhanced cooperating agency involvement in the NEPA process. These benefits, including analytical and process efficiencies, improved trust among stakeholders, and greater likelihood of successful implementation of a proposed action, extend to both

195

DOE Lessons Learned Documents and Information  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Corporate Operating Experience Review Program Corporate Operating Experience Review Program Home Contact Us Documents & Info DOE LL Database LL Links Special Operations Reports Safety Advisories Safety Alerts Special Reports Safety Bulletins OE Summaries Just-In-Time Reports Defense Nuclear Security Lessons Learned Center (DNS-LLC) HSS Logo Corporate Operating Experience Program DOE Corporate Operating Experience (OE) Program: The Department of Energy's (DOE) corporate OE Program helps to prevent the recurrence of significant adverse events/trends by sharing performance information, lessons learned and good practices across the DOE complex. This program includes: DOE Site Performance Information, ORPS Weekly Summary of Significant Occurrences DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Collection Jump to the Lessons Learned products which make up the major sections of this web page.

196

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, March 1995  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This second quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completedbetween October 1 and December 31, 1994. It is based on responses to the revisedquestionnaire that was provided...

197

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1995 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 1995 June 1995 Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 1995 January 1 and March 31, 1995. It is based primarily on responses to the revised questionnaire that was provided for use during January 1995, and includes information on direct and indirect NEPA process costs and on total project costs. The report also includes a feature story that compares the techniques used to analyze environmental justice in the preparation of three environmental impact statements (EISs): the Savannah River Waste Management Draft EIS, the Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs EIS, and the Draft EIS on a Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent

198

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Fourth Quarter FY 2001 (12/5/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 1 National Environmental Policy Act N E P A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT Fourth Quarter FY 2001 December 5, 2001; Issue No. 29 CEQ Chair Describes Goals, Supports NEPA Principles The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) wants Federal agencies to weave environmental considerations into everyday business, as opposed to conducting NEPA compliance as a distinct project to fend off lawsuits. Recently appointed CEQ Chair James L. Connaughton (Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2001, page 12) described this and other key CEQ goals at a September 21, 2001, meeting with Federal agency NEPA Contacts. Mr. Connaughton made it clear that this administration supports NEPA’s principles “as much as all previous administrations.” In this connection, he referred to

199

http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/process/ll/95q2.htm  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2ND 2ND QUARTER FY 1995 Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance U.S. Department of Energy June 1, 1995 INTRODUCTION To foster continuing improvement of the Department's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program, the Secretarial Policy Statement on NEPA, issued June 13, 1994, requires the Office of Environment, Safety and Health to solicit comments from the NEPA Document Manager, the NEPA Compliance Officer, and team members after completing each environmental impact statement and environmental assessment on lessons learned in the process, and to distribute a quarterly summary to all NEPA Compliance Officers and NEPA Document Managers. This quarterly report summarizes the lessons learned for documents completed between January 1 and March 31, 1995. It is based primarily on responses to the revised questionnaire that was

200

Briefing: DOE EM ITR Landfill Assessment Project Lessons Learned...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Briefing: DOE EM ITR Landfill Assessment Project Lessons Learned Briefing: DOE EM ITR Landfill Assessment Project Lessons Learned By: Craig H. Benson, PhD, PE Where: EM SSAB...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Better Buildings Residential Network: Lessons Learned: Peer Exchange Calls  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Better Buildings Residential Network: Lessons Learned: Peer Exchange Calls, from the U.S. Department of Energy.

202

Going Deep Green: A Whole House Approach- Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Provides an overview of the SustainableWorks program based in Puget Sound and Spokane, Washington, including lessons learned.

203

Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presented at Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen Conference, April 2-3, 2008, Sacramento, California

204

Refueliing Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Agenda for Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen Conference, April 2-3, 2008, Sacramento, California

205

Info-Exch 2012- Sites Lessons Learned Presentation  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Sites around the DOE complex funded by the EM Recovery Act Program provided lessons learned during the 2012 Information Exchange.

206

Lessons Learned from Independent Verification Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Demonstration Demonstration Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education - Independent Verification Lessons Learned IV - performed at nine DOE sites from 2004 to 2008 Page 1 of 2 Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Multiple Sites Lessons Learned from Independent Verification Activities Challenge The Department of Energy clears property from radiological control after the property has been demonstrated to meet the Department's stringent radiation protection requirements. Radiological surveys are used to demonstrate compliance with the requirements. Independent verification (IV) activities are conducted by an independent third party as a quality check on radiological surveys procedures and practices. The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) performs independent verification for the Department. In this lessons learned report, ORISE summarizes their

207

Very Large System Dynamics Models - Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper provides lessons learned from developing several large system dynamics (SD) models. System dynamics modeling practice emphasize the need to keep models small so that they are manageable and understandable. This practice is generally reasonable and prudent; however, there are times that large SD models are necessary. This paper outlines two large SD projects that were done at two Department of Energy National Laboratories, the Idaho National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories. This paper summarizes the models and then discusses some of the valuable lessons learned during these two modeling efforts.

Jacob J. Jacobson; Leonard Malczynski

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Building Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned (Brochure), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Building Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned (Brochure), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) This case study presents the lessons learned from incorporating energy efficiency in the rebuilding and renovating of New Orleans K-12 schools after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. 51639.pdf More Documents & Publications Building Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned (Brochure), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rising Above the Water: New Orleans Implements Energy Efficiency and Sustainability Practices Following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (Fact Sheet), Integrated Deployment: Disaster Recovery (ID)

209

Lessons Learned: Creating the Chicago Climate Action Plan | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lessons Learned: Creating the Chicago Climate Action Plan Lessons Learned: Creating the Chicago Climate Action Plan Jump to: navigation, search Name Lessons Learned: Creating the Chicago Climate Action Plan Agency/Company /Organization City of Chicago Partner Global Philanthropy Partnership, ICLEI Focus Area Buildings, Energy Efficiency - Central Plant, Greenhouse Gas, Other, Non-renewable Energy, Transportation, Renewable Energy Phase Create a Vision, Determine Baseline, Develop Goals, Prepare a Plan, Get Feedback, Create Early Successes Topics Low emission development planning Resource Type Lessons learned/best practices Availability Free Publication Date 6/1/2008 Website http://www.chicagoclimateactio Locality Chicago, IL References Lessons Learned: Creating the Chicago Climate Action Plan[1] Overview

210

Building Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned (Brochure), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Building Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned (Brochure), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) This brochure presents the lessons learned from incorporating energy efficiency in the rebuilding and renovating of New Orleans K-12 schools after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. 51989.pdf More Documents & Publications Building Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned (Brochure), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rising Above the Water: New Orleans Implements Energy Efficiency and Sustainability Practices Following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (Fact Sheet), Integrated Deployment: Disaster Recovery (ID)

211

Moldova National Inventory Report - Lessons Learned | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Moldova National Inventory Report - Lessons Learned Moldova National Inventory Report - Lessons Learned Jump to: navigation, search Name Moldova Second National Inventory Report - Lessons Learned Agency/Company /Organization United Nations Development Programme Sector Energy, Land Topics GHG inventory, Background analysis Resource Type Publications, Lessons learned/best practices Country Moldova Eastern Europe References UNDP National Communications Support Program[1] "Key Lessons Learned From The Process of Preparing Moldova's SNC 1. National experts stated that IPCC default Emission Factors (EFs) were sometimes inappropriate for sources highly dependent on local conditions. Active involvement of key stakeholders and relevant organizations made it possible for Moldova to develop local EFs for prioritized key sources;

212

Lessons Learned: Pangue Hydroelectric | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Lessons Learned: Pangue Hydroelectric Lessons Learned: Pangue Hydroelectric Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Lessons Learned: Pangue Hydroelectric Agency/Company /Organization: International Finance Corporation Sector: Energy Focus Area: Renewable Energy, Hydro Topics: Background analysis Resource Type: Lessons learned/best practices Website: www.ifc.org/ifcext/sustainability.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/p_pangue_summ Country: Chile UN Region: Latin America and the Caribbean Coordinates: -35.675147°, -71.542969° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":-35.675147,"lon":-71.542969,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

213

Lessons learned from existing biomass power plants  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report includes summary information on 20 biomass power plants, which represent some of the leaders in the industry. In each category an effort is made to identify plants that illustrate particular points. The project experiences described capture some important lessons learned that lead in the direction of an improved biomass power industry.

Wiltsee, G.

2000-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

214

NREL-Lessons Learned from Energy Efficiency Lighting Programs Webinar |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

NREL-Lessons Learned from Energy Efficiency Lighting Programs Webinar NREL-Lessons Learned from Energy Efficiency Lighting Programs Webinar Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Lessons Learned from Energy Efficiency Lighting Programs Agency/Company /Organization: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Sector: Energy Focus Area: Energy Efficiency, Buildings Topics: Policies/deployment programs Resource Type: Webinar, Guide/manual, Training materials, Lessons learned/best practices Website: www.nrel.gov/applying_technologies/state_local_activities/webinar_2010 Lessons Learned from Energy Efficiency Lighting Programs Screenshot References: Lessons Learned from Energy Efficiency Lighting Programs[1] Logo: Lessons Learned from Energy Efficiency Lighting Programs Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Assistance

215

Policy Impacts on Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Past Experiences to  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Policy Impacts on Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Past Experiences to Policy Impacts on Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Past Experiences to Inform New Initiatives Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary Name: Policy Impacts on Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Past Experiences to Inform New Initiatives Agency/Company /Organization: Nicholas Institute Sector: Land Focus Area: Forestry Topics: Policies/deployment programs Resource Type: Lessons learned/best practices Website: www.climatefocus.com/documents/files/policy_impacts.pdf Policy Impacts on Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Past Experiences to Inform New Initiatives Screenshot References: Policy Impacts on Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Past Experiences to Inform New Initiatives[1] Overview "This report aims to provide lessons to inform U.S. and international

216

Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Proceedings from the DOE sponsored Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen workshop to understand how lessons from past experiences can inform future efforts to commercialize hydrogen vehicles.

217

Guidance Regarding Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Process:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Process: Interim Actions Guidance Regarding Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Process: Interim Actions DOE guidance to provide assistance in determining whether an action within the scope of an EIS may be taken before a record of decision is issued. The guidance reviews applicable requirements, gives examples of the types of actions that may proceed as interim actions, describes case studies, and outlines the steps in the EIS process for interim actions. Guidance Regarding Actions That May Proceed During the NEPA Process: Interim Actions More Documents & Publications NEPA and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 Mini-Guidance Articles from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports, Dec. 1994 to

218

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994) Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994) The purpose of this guidance memorandum is to describe potential benefits of conducting a site-wide NEPA review (environmental impact statement orenvironmental assessment). Site-wide reviews can aid the Department of Energy (DOE) in meeting its goals to streamline the NEPA process, to make that process more useful to decision makers and thepublic, and to reduce the time and cost required to prepare NEPA documents. Benefits of Site-wide National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review More Documents & Publications Mini-Guidance Articles from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports, Dec. 1994 to Sept. 2005 "Frequently Asked Questions" on the Department of Energy's NEPA Regulations

219

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994) Benefits of Site-wide NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Review (1994) The purpose of this guidance memorandum is to describe potential benefits of conducting a site-wide NEPA review (environmental impact statement orenvironmental assessment). Site-wide reviews can aid the Department of Energy (DOE) in meeting its goals to streamline the NEPA process, to make that process more useful to decision makers and thepublic, and to reduce the time and cost required to prepare NEPA documents. Benefits of Site-wide National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review More Documents & Publications Mini-Guidance Articles from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports, Dec. 1994 to Sept. 2005 "Frequently Asked Questions" on the Department of Energy's NEPA Regulations

220

WHC significant lessons learned 1993--1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A lesson learned as defined in DOE-STD-7501-95, Development of DOE Lessons Learned Programs, is: A ``good work practice`` or innovative approach that is captured and shared to promote repeat applications or an adverse work practice or experience that is captured and shared to avoid a recurrence. The key word in both parts of this definition is ``shared``. This document was published to share a wide variety of recent Hanford experiences with other DOE sites. It also provides a valuable tool to be used in new employee and continuing training programs at Hanford facilities and at other DOE locations. This manual is divided into sections to facilitate extracting appropriate subject material when developing training modules. Many of the bulletins could be categorized into more than one section, however, so examination of other related sections is encouraged.

Bickford, J.C.

1997-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

EM SSAB ITR Landfill Assessment Project Lessons Learned Presentation...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

PGDP by DOE personnel is recommended. * DOE should develop lessons learned documents on scheduling, stakeholder interactions, etc. 20 Savannah River Site 21 Disposal operations...

222

Peer Exchange Calls Inspire New Lessons Learned Greatest Hits  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A new Lessons Learned: Peer Exchange Calls resource summarizes top takeaways shared by Better Buildings Residential Network members, from tips to collaborating with utilities to cost-effective...

223

Response to IG Recommendation to Create a Formal Lessons Learned...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, October 31, 2012 2014 IEA Task 42 Meeting, Berlin, Germany, January 22, 2014 Relevant Benchmark Lessons Learned Systems BETO researched best...

224

DOE EM Project Experience & Lessons Learned for In Situ Decommissionin...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

"DOE EM Project Experience & Lessons Learned for In Situ Decommissioning" report is to capture the considerable technical experience gained to date for implementation of In Situ...

225

Policy Impacts on Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Past Experiences...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

to Inform New Initiatives Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Policy Impacts on Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Past Experiences to Inform New...

226

February 20, 2014 Webinar- Performance of Engineered Barriers: Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

P&RA CoP Webinar - 2/20/2014 - Performance of Engineered Barriers: Lessons Learned Craig H. Benson (University of Wisconsin-Madison/CRESP)

227

Lessons Learned at the Nevada National Security Site Implementing...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Implementing the EFCOG WP&C Guide Assessing to the Guide CRADs Being Assessed - EFCOG Peer Review 9Coddington--NevadaNationalSecurityLessonsLearned.pdf More Documents &...

228

Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On April 2-3, 2008, participants from industry, government agencies, universities, and national laboratories participated in a workshop to review lessons learned from efforts to commercialize...

229

Microsoft Word - 08-02-06 Security Lessons Learned TEC Security...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, Final 1 DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation: Lessons Learned from Security Planning and Execution OCRWM has reviewed lessons learned from past high visibility Spent Nuclear...

230

Lessons Learned | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Lessons Learned Lessons Learned Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management Processes and Procedures Cost & Contingency EDIA Escalation Rates Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Certifications Awards Lessons Learned Tools & Resources SC Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Project Management Lessons Learned Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page NSLS II Magnet Procurement .pdf file (1.3MB) October 2013 OLCF-3 Lessons Learned Report .pdf file (39KB) September 2013 ISB Leasons Learned Report .pdf file (196KB) July 2013

231

New Report: Early Lessons Learned in Bringing SSL to Market ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Learned in Bringing SSL to Market New Report: Early Lessons Learned in Bringing SSL to Market February 4, 2014 - 12:00am Addthis The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has...

232

LESSONS LEARNED FROM A LANDFILL SLOPE FAILURE INVOLVING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

LESSONS LEARNED FROM A LANDFILL SLOPE FAILURE INVOLVING GEOSYTNTHETICS Virginia L. Wilson.L. Soderman and G.P. Raymond November 12, 1998 #12;LESSONS LEARNED FROM A LANDFILL SLOPE FAILURE INVOLVING slopes at waste containment facilities. The Geneva Landfill is located near Geneva, Ohio which

233

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report, Department of Energy -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report, Department of Energy Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report, Department of Energy - January 2005 Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report, Department of Energy - January 2005 January 2005 Lessons Learned Report Electrical Safety During Excavation and Penetrations This report summarizes the observations, insights, and lessons learned from evaluating the electrical safety during excavations and penetrations during Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) environment, safety, and health (ES&H) management inspections conducted in 2004. OA, within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance, identified electrical safety during excavations and blind penetrations as a focus area across the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) complex based on an analysis of

234

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, December 2014 | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Assessment Report Transitions Give NEPAnode a Try Environmental Questionnaire Sustainability Rating System EAs and EISs Completed This Quarter Cost and Time Facts New NEPA...

235

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Cumulative Index  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The LLQR is produced as a means of disseminating NEPA program metrics, along with related guidance, case studies, analysis, references, litigation updates, and resource information. The LLQR...

236

NREL Alt Fuel Lessons Learned: Hydrogen Infrastructure  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Britta K. Gross Britta K. Gross Manager, Hydrogen and Electrical Infrastructure General Motors Corporation NREL Alt Fuel Lessons Learned -- Hydrogen Infrastructure -- Sacramento, CA April 3, 2008 * Very limited access to today's stations - Stations not made available or... - No-go access contracts/liability clauses or ... - Assurance of access by customers/drivers * "OEM x vehicles/drivers have priority over OEM y" * e.g. "Can't fuel on Tuesday and Thursday afternoons 4-7pm" * Very limited availability of 700bar fueling - Every major OEM is developing 700bar capability (GM vehicles since 2004) - With only two exceptions, 700bar is the baseline * Current stations are largely behind-the-fence, demo-like, and lagging in technology availability (note: vehicle technology refreshed every 3-4 years)

237

Aquatic Species Program (ASP): Lessons Learned (Presentation)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Aquatic Species Aquatic Species Program (ASP): Lessons Learned AFOSR Workshop Washington, D.C. February 19-21, 2008 Sponsored by Air Force Office of Science Eric E. Jarvis, Ph.D. National Renewable Energy Laboratory National Bioenergy Center eric_jarvis@nrel.gov NREL/PR-510-43232 The ASP Didn't Invent the Concept of Fuels from Algae...  Algae for methane (via anaerobic digestion) * Meier (1955); UC Berkeley 1957-59 (Oswald and Golueke) * Wastewater use, recycling of CO 2 and nutrients  Revival during Energy Crisis of 1970's * Uziel et al. (1975); Benemann et al. (1976-80) * Still focused on methane and hydrogen * Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) * Later DOE (SERI founded in 1977) ...But the ASP Took the Concept to the Next Level  Supported work at SERI/NREL and through

238

Lessons Learned from SOFC/SOEC Development  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Systems Research, Inc. Systems Research, Inc. 1 Lessons Learned from SOFC/SOEC Development Greg Gege Tao and Anil V. Virkar Materials and Systems Research Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah Presented at NREL/DOE 2011 REVERSIBLE FUEL CELLS Workshop Crystal City, Virginia April 19, 2011 Materials and Systems Research, Inc. 2 * * EIA Annual Energy Outlook AEO2011 Early Release, December 2010 U.S. Electricity Generation - present & future by year 2035:  80% of America's electricity from clean energy sources: wind, solar, clean coal, natural gas, nuclear, etc.  Renewables represent the smallest share among the various sectors, but are significant  Renewable generation increase from 10% to 14%: 415 billon kWh/yr to 725 billion kWh/yr (>75% increase)

239

Sellafield Decommissioning Programme - Update and Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Sellafield site in North West England has over 240 active facilities covering the full nuclear cycle from fuel manufacture through generation, reprocessing and waste treatment. The Sellafield decommissioning programme was formally initiated in the mid 1980s though several plants had been decommissioned prior to this primarily to create space for other plants. Since the initiation of the programme 7 plants have been completely decommissioned, significant progress has been made in a further 16 and a total of 56 major project phases have been completed. This programme update will explain the decommissioning arrangements and strategies and illustrate the progress made on a number of the plants including the Windscale Pile Chimneys, the first reprocessing plan and plutonium plants. These present a range of different challenges and requiring approaches from fully hands on to fully remote. Some of the key lessons learned will be highlighted.

Lutwyche, P. R.; Challinor, S. F.

2003-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

240

Power-games and organizational learning: Lessons for Organizations Management .  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Power-games and organizational learning: Lessons for Organizations Management . Thierry LEVY Learning; Management. hal-00848674,version1-27Jul2013 #12;2 Power-games and organizational learning-Economic approach, Henri SAVALL (1981) developed. KEY-WORDS: Game-Theory; Conflicts; Negotiation, Organizational

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Promotion of Wind Energy: Lessons Learned from International Experience and  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Promotion of Wind Energy: Lessons Learned from International Experience and Promotion of Wind Energy: Lessons Learned from International Experience and United Nations Development Programme Global Environment Facility (UNDP-GEF) Projects Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: Promotion of Wind Energy: Lessons Learned from International Experience and United Nations Development Programme Global Environment Facility (UNDP-GEF) Projects Focus Area: Renewable Energy Topics: Opportunity Assessment & Screening Website: www.undp.org/gef/documents/publications/windpower_web.pdf Equivalent URI: cleanenergysolutions.org/content/promotion-wind-energy-lessons-learned Language: English Policies: "Deployment Programs,Regulations,Financial Incentives" is not in the list of possible values (Deployment Programs, Financial Incentives, Regulations) for this property.

242

CRAD, Lessons Learned Assessment Plan | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Assessment Plan Lessons Learned Assessment Plan CRAD, Lessons Learned Assessment Plan Performance Objective: Management should have an established Lessons Learned Program with an effective system to continuously distribute information of improvement in safe operations to all affected personnel. Criteria: Timely and effective action is taken to track and correct identified deficiencies and to prevent their recurrence by addressing their basic causes and related generic problems. (DOE/EH-0135) Management installs an effective corrective action program (caWeb) for safety-related issues, wherein records are updated and actions are tracked through completion. (DOE/EH-0135) Management uses the corrective action program (caWeb) as the database to analyze safety issues, implement corrective actions, and define

243

CRAD, Lessons Learned Assessment Plan | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned Assessment Plan Lessons Learned Assessment Plan CRAD, Lessons Learned Assessment Plan Performance Objective: Management should have an established Lessons Learned Program with an effective system to continuously distribute information of improvement in safe operations to all affected personnel. Criteria: Timely and effective action is taken to track and correct identified deficiencies and to prevent their recurrence by addressing their basic causes and related generic problems. (DOE/EH-0135) Management installs an effective corrective action program (caWeb) for safety-related issues, wherein records are updated and actions are tracked through completion. (DOE/EH-0135) Management uses the corrective action program (caWeb) as the database to analyze safety issues, implement corrective actions, and define

244

Idaho Students Learning Lessons on Energy Efficiency | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Idaho Students Learning Lessons on Energy Efficiency Idaho Students Learning Lessons on Energy Efficiency Idaho Students Learning Lessons on Energy Efficiency December 9, 2009 - 12:07pm Addthis Joshua DeLung When Idaho officials decided to spend Recovery Act money to make their school buildings more energy efficient, it set off a chain reaction. Now, the project is creating more comfortable and safe learning environments for its students and providing them with examples of how to save energy. At the same time, it's saving taxpayers some dough. The Idaho K-12 School Efficiency Project increases energy efficiency while saving precious education dollars, says schools superintendant Tom Luna. "It also provides a great opportunity for schools to incorporate lessons about energy education in the classroom," he says.

245

Building Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

These brochures present the lessons learned from incorporating energy efficiency in the rebuilding and renovating of New Orleans K-12 schools after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Both the summary brochure and the full brochure are available.

246

Capturing and Applying Lessons Learned During Engineering Equipment Installation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper describes the implementation of a knowledge management tool to capture and reuse the lessons learned from the installation of engineering equipment. It has been developed as an adjunct to an existin...

Ian Watson

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

Capturing and Applying Lessons Learned During Engineering Equipment Installation  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper describes the implementation of a knowledge management tool to capture and reuse the lessons learned from the installation of engineering equipment. It has been developed as an adjunct to an exist-i...

Ian Watson

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

248

University Reactor Conversion Lessons Learned Workshop for Purdue University Reactor  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energys Idaho National Laboratory, under its programmatic responsibility for managing the University Research Reactor Conversions, has completed the conversion of the reactor at Purdue University Reactor. With this work completed and in anticipation of other impending conversion projects, the INL convened and engaged the project participants in a structured discussion to capture the lessons learned. The lessons learned process has allowed us to capture gaps, opportunities, and good practices, drawing from the project teams experiences. These lessons will be used to raise the standard of excellence, effectiveness, and efficiency in all future conversion projects.

Eric C. Woolstenhulme; Dana M. Hewit

2008-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

CEBAF Upgrade: Cryomodule Performance And Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility is currently engaged in the 12 GeV Upgrade Project. The goal of the 12 GeV Upgrade is a doubling of the available beam energy of the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) from 6 GeV to 12 GeV. This increase in beam energy will be due in large part to the addition of ten C100 cryomodules plus associated new RF in the CEBAF linacs. The C100 cryomodules are designed to deliver 100 MeV per installed cryomodule. Each C100 cryomodule is built around a string of eight seven-cell, electro-polished, superconducting RF cavities. While an average performance of 100MV per cryomodule is needed to achieve the overall 12 GeV beam energy goal, the actual performance goal for the cryomodules is an average energy gain of 108 MV to provide operational headroom. Cryomodule production started in December 2010. All ten of the C100 cryomodules are installed in the linac tunnels and are on schedule to complete commissioning by September 2013. Performance during Commissioning has ranged from 104 MV to 118 MV. In May, 2012 a test of an early C100 achieved 108 MV with full beam loading. This paper will discuss the performance of the C100 cryomodules along with operational challenges and lessons learned for future designs.

Drury, Michael A.; Davis, G. Kirk; Hogan, John P.; Hovater, J. Curt; King, Lawrence; Marhauser, Frank; Park, HyeKyoung; Preble, Joe; Reece, Charles E.; Rimmer, Robert A.; Wang, Haipeng; Wiseman, Mark A.

2014-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Growth of the NGV Market: Lessons Learned Roadmap for Infrastructure Development  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presented at Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen Conference, April 2-3, 2008, Sacramento, California

251

Compile lessons learned and good practices from ongoing and previous  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Compile lessons learned and good practices from ongoing and previous Compile lessons learned and good practices from ongoing and previous sustainable development efforts in the country Jump to: navigation, search Stage 2 LEDS Home Introduction to Framework Assess current country plans, policies, practices, and capacities Develop_BAU Stage 4: Prioritizing and Planning for Actions Begin execution of implementation plans 1.0. Organizing the LEDS Process 1.1. Institutional Structure for LEDS 1.2. Workplan to Develop the LEDS 1.3. Roles and responsibilities to develop LEDS 2.1. Assess current country plans, policies, practices, and capacities 2.2. Compile lessons learned and good practices from ongoing and previous sustainable development efforts in the country 2.3. Assess public and private sector capacity to support initiatives 2.4. Assess and improve the national GHG inventory and other

252

SLIDESHOW: Learning Valuable Lessons About Energy with Scouts | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SLIDESHOW: Learning Valuable Lessons About Energy with Scouts SLIDESHOW: Learning Valuable Lessons About Energy with Scouts SLIDESHOW: Learning Valuable Lessons About Energy with Scouts October 31, 2013 - 3:09pm Addthis 1 of 13 A Boy Scout attends a class to earn a merit badge for Energy Action Month. | Photo by Matty Greene. 2 of 13 Girl Scouts ask questions about college life during their class on nuclear science. | Photo by Matty Greene. 3 of 13 An adult volunteer sets up ping pong balls on mouse traps to illustrate what atoms in a nuclear reaction look like. | Photo by Matty Greene. 4 of 13 A Girl Scout works on building an electroscope as part of the nuclear science class. | Photo by Matty Greene. 5 of 13 A Boy Scout uses static electricity from his hair to test charge with the electroscope he built. | Photo by Matty Greene.

253

Lessons Learned: An Ongoing Dialogue About Smart Grid | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned: An Ongoing Dialogue About Smart Grid Lessons Learned: An Ongoing Dialogue About Smart Grid Lessons Learned: An Ongoing Dialogue About Smart Grid November 21, 2011 - 11:31am Addthis EPB’s $226 million Smart Grid Investment Grant project, part of the Energy Department's Recovery Act funding has allowed upgrades on its distribution system and the installation of “smart” switches and sensor equipment for 164 distribution circuits as well as the deployment of approximately 1500 smart switches system-wide. Thanks to these smart grid technologies, EPB saved thousands of hours of outage time for their consumers. | DoE photo EPB's $226 million Smart Grid Investment Grant project, part of the Energy Department's Recovery Act funding has allowed upgrades on its distribution system and the installation of "smart" switches and sensor

254

DOE Railcar Fleet Asset Planning & Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Railcar Railcar Fleet DOE Railcar Fleet Asset Planning & Lessons Learned Dave Lojek - US DOE Lessons Learned Dave Lojek US DOE Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (EMCBC) Support: Office of Packaging & Transportation (EM-45) Di i O i Discussion Overview *Completed Rail Campaigns - LLW -Fernald, Mound, Savannah River *In Progress - LLW -Savannah River, Brookhaven, Moab *ForeCast - LLW -Portsmouth, Paducah, D&D, DUF6 2 *Lessons Learned F ld Cl P j t Fernald Closure Project First Rail Shipment: April 26, 1999 First Rail Shipment: Final Rail Shipment: April 26, 1999 October 11, 2006 Unit Trains Shipped: 201 Railcars Shipped: 12,000 3 Tons Shipped: 1,200,000 F ld R il E i t Fernald Rail Equipment * 3 - Locomotives * 250 Total Railcars In Service 190 New Purchase Gov't Gondolas 60 Leased Gondola Railcars

255

SLIDESHOW: Learning Valuable Lessons About Energy with Scouts | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Learning Valuable Lessons About Energy with Scouts Learning Valuable Lessons About Energy with Scouts SLIDESHOW: Learning Valuable Lessons About Energy with Scouts Addthis 1 of 13 A Boy Scout attends a class to earn a merit badge for Energy Action Month. | Photo by Matty Greene. 2 of 13 Girl Scouts ask questions about college life during their class on nuclear science. | Photo by Matty Greene. 3 of 13 An adult volunteer sets up ping pong balls on mouse traps to illustrate what atoms in a nuclear reaction look like. | Photo by Matty Greene. 4 of 13 A Girl Scout works on building an electroscope as part of the nuclear science class. | Photo by Matty Greene. 5 of 13 A Boy Scout uses static electricity from his hair to test charge with the electroscope he built. | Photo by Matty Greene. 6 of 13 An adult volunteer talks with Scouts about energy -- including saving,

256

Lessons Learned: An Ongoing Dialogue About Smart Grid | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned: An Ongoing Dialogue About Smart Grid Lessons Learned: An Ongoing Dialogue About Smart Grid Lessons Learned: An Ongoing Dialogue About Smart Grid November 21, 2011 - 11:31am Addthis EPB’s $226 million Smart Grid Investment Grant project, part of the Energy Department's Recovery Act funding has allowed upgrades on its distribution system and the installation of “smart” switches and sensor equipment for 164 distribution circuits as well as the deployment of approximately 1500 smart switches system-wide. Thanks to these smart grid technologies, EPB saved thousands of hours of outage time for their consumers. | DoE photo EPB's $226 million Smart Grid Investment Grant project, part of the Energy Department's Recovery Act funding has allowed upgrades on its distribution system and the installation of "smart" switches and sensor

257

Lessons Learned from Alternative Transportation Fuels: Modeling Transition Dynamics  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Lessons Learned from Lessons Learned from Alternative Transportation Fuels: Modeling Transition Dynamics C. Welch Technical Report NREL/TP-540-39446 February 2006 Lessons Learned from Alternative Transportation Fuels: Modeling Transition Dynamics C. Welch Prepared under Task Nos. HS04.2000 and HS06.1002 Technical Report NREL/TP-540-39446 February 2006 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute * Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any

258

Now Available- Customer Participation in the Smart Grid: Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability has released a new report titled "Customer Participation in the Smart Grid: Lessons Learned." The report highlights the experiences of four Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant projects with customer education and outreach efforts, which are key ingredients for Smart Grid success.

259

Fraud Detection in Telecommunications: History and Lessons Learned  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Fraud Detection in Telecommunications: History and Lessons Learned Richard A. BECKER, Chris, fraud matured in the area of transac- tional businesses, most notably in the telecommunications of the telecommunications business, "social engineering" was used to convince telephone operators to give access to lines

Volinsky, Chris

260

Hanford Site Shares Lessons Learned in Retrieving Highly Radioactive Material  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

RICHLAND, Wash. EMs Richland Operations Office (Richland) and its contractor, CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M HILL), welcomed staff from the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Transuranic (TRU) waste processing team in Tennessee to the Hanford site recently to share lessons learned in the retrieval and processing of highly radioactive material, called sludge.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Lessons learned How to Build Successful Heat Pump Markets  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;2 Lessons learned ­ How to Build Successful Heat Pump Markets Lukas Bergmann, Delta Energy & Environment European Heat Pump Summit 2013 Nürnberg, 15th October 2013 Contact: lukas CHP Small Wind Photovoltaics Energy Efficiency Smart Demand Heat Pumps Networks Micro-CHP Energy

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

262

Lesson Summary Students will learn about the magnetic fields of  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Knowledge & Skills Understanding of: · Magnetic field lines · Magnetic field strength decreases class period Materials per student · NASA STERO mission story · Diagrams of the magnetic field linesLesson Summary Students will learn about the magnetic fields of the Sun and Earth. This activity

Mojzsis, Stephen J.

263

Ontology-Based Network Management: Study Cases and Lessons Learned  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Ontology based network management has recently evolved from a theoretical proposal to a more mature technology. As such, it is now being applied in many research projects in a number of different network management and security scenarios. This application ... Keywords: Autonomic management, Lessons learned, Network monitoring, Network security, OWL, Ontology-based network management, SWRL, Study case

Jorge E. Lpez De Vergara; Antonio Guerrero; Vctor A. Villagr; Julio Berrocal

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

Lessons Learned During HVAC Installation Dept. of Computer Science  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Lessons Learned During HVAC Installation Ian Watson AI-CBR Dept. of Computer Science University of HVAC equipment. It has been developed as an adjunct to an existing system that uses case-based reasoning to reuse previous HVAC installation specifications and designs. The system described lets

Watson, Ian

265

Lesson Summary Students will learn about different carbon  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Lesson Summary Students will learn about different carbon sources and sinks and the release · Knowledge of carbon as the main constituent of living organisms AAAS Science Benchmarks The Physical Setting Materials · 1 copy of The Carbon Cycle (Figure 1) · 1 copy of The Carbon Cycle A4 sheet for each student · 1

Mojzsis, Stephen J.

266

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE (EH-42)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision: January 24, 2012 Revision: January 24, 2012 OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE (GC-54) Forrestal Building, Room 3E-080 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Phone: 202-586-4600 Fax: 202-586-7031 Website: http://energy.gov/nepa/ Phone (202-58X-) Usual Assignments Email: firstname.lastname@hq.doe.gov Carol Borgstrom 6-4600 Director Lettie Wormley 6-4610 Secretary Eastern Energy and Waste Management Unit Brian Costner 6-9924 Unit Leader (Recovery Act Lead, Surplus Plutonium Disposition SEIS) Connie Chen 6-0733 OE, NEPA Stakeholders Directory, 10 CFR Part 1022 Yardena Mansoor 6-9326 EM (Oak Ridge, Savannah River Site), FE (Strategic Petroleum Reserve), OE, Western Area Power Administration, Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, Property

267

Green Pricing Experience and Lessons Learned Edward A. Holt  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Pricing Experience and Lessons Learned Pricing Experience and Lessons Learned Edward A. Holt Ed Holt & Associates Pacific Grove, California, August 25-31 Prepared for 1996 ACEEE Summer Study, Seven electric utilities in the United States offer a green pricing program, an optional product or service that customers choose if they wish to increase their use of renewable energy resources. Some two dozen additional utilities are considering or are planning to offer this option. The multiple approaches used and being considered recognize that green pricing is still in an experimental stage of development. The seven operating programs offer a green tariff for extra renewables, fixed monthly fees, and the opportunity to contribute to a tax-deductible fund. The results, in terms of participation

268

LESSONS LEARNED Biosurveillance Mobile App Development Intern Competition (Summer 2013)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the lessons learned document for the BEOWulf Biosurveillance Mobile App Development Intern Competition is to capture the projects lessons learned in a formal document for use by other project managers on similar future projects. This document may be used as part of new project planning for similar projects in order to determine what problems occurred and how those problems were handled and may be avoided in the future. Additionally, this document details what went well with the project and why, so that other project managers may capitalize on these actions. Project managers may also use this document to determine who the project team members were in order to solicit feedback for planning their projects in the future. This document will be formally communicated with the organization and will become a part of the organizational assets and archives.

Noonan, Christine F.; Henry, Michael J.; Corley, Courtney D.

2014-01-14T23:59:59.000Z

269

Lessons Learned from the Intelligent Workplace Project at Carnegie Mellon  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned from the Intelligent Workplace Project at Carnegie Mellon Lessons Learned from the Intelligent Workplace Project at Carnegie Mellon University Speaker(s): Sila Kiliccote Date: March 16, 2004 - 12:00pm Location: Bldg. 90 Seminar Host/Point of Contact: Francis Rubinstein The Robert L. Preger Intelligent Workplace (IW) at Carnegie Mellon University, which opened in December 1997, is a living laboratory designed to explore how new technologies and concepts can be applied to the built environment to improve building efficiency and human performance. The project's goals are to provide:1) User comfort and satisfaction; 2) Organizational Flexibility; 3) Technological Adaptability; and 4) Environmental Sustainability.At this unique site, the building systems integration issues posed a bigger challenge than expected. Most systems

270

Lessons Learned: NREL Village Power Program | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Power Program Power Program Jump to: navigation, search Name Lessons Learned: NREL Village Power Program Agency/Company /Organization National Renewable Energy Laboratory Focus Area Non-renewable Energy, Renewable Energy, Biomass, Solar, - Solar Pv, Wind Phase Bring the Right People Together, Evaluate Options, Develop Goals, "Evaluate Effectiveness and Revise As Needed" is not in the list of possible values (Bring the Right People Together, Create a Vision, Determine Baseline, Evaluate Options, Develop Goals, Prepare a Plan, Get Feedback, Develop Finance and Implement Projects, Create Early Successes, Evaluate Effectiveness and Revise as Needed) for this property. Resource Type Lessons learned/best practices Availability Publicly available--Free Publication Date 7/1/1998

271

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report - Environment, Safety, and Health Evaluations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environment, Safety, and Health Evaluations Independent Oversight Lessons Learned Report Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance U. S. Department of Energy OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................1 2.0 RESULTS .................................................................................3 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE INSPECTION AREAS OF EMPHASIS...........................................................7 APPENDIX A - FOCUS AREA RESULTS ....................................8 APPENDIX B - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ................25 Abbreviations Used in This Report AAAHC Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable CAIRS Computerized Accident and Injury Reporting System

272

Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariffs: Lessons Learned from the U.S. and Abroad  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariffs: Lessons Learned from the U.S. and Abroad Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariffs: Lessons Learned from the U.S. and Abroad Presentation Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary Name: Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariffs: Lessons Learned from the U.S. and Abroad Presentation Agency/Company /Organization: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Sector: Energy Focus Area: Renewable Energy Topics: Policies/deployment programs Resource Type: Presentation, Lessons learned/best practices References: Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariffs: Lessons Learned from the U.S. and Abroad Presentation[1] Logo: Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariffs: Lessons Learned from the U.S. and Abroad Presentation This presentation reviews Feed-in Tariff (FIT) Policy Overview, FIT Policy Implementation in the U.S., Policy Design Comparison with Europe, FIT

273

What Is Needed to Make REDD+ Work on the Ground: Lessons Learned from Pilot  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

What Is Needed to Make REDD+ Work on the Ground: Lessons Learned from Pilot What Is Needed to Make REDD+ Work on the Ground: Lessons Learned from Pilot Forest Carbon Initiatives Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary LAUNCH TOOL Name: What Is Needed to Make REDD+ Work on the Ground: Lessons Learned from Pilot Forest Carbon Initiatives Agency/Company /Organization: Forest Carbon Portal Sector: Land Focus Area: Forestry Topics: Policies/deployment programs Resource Type: Lessons learned/best practices Website: www.forestcarbonportal.com/resource/what-needed-make-redd-work-ground- What Is Needed to Make REDD+ Work on the Ground: Lessons Learned from Pilot Forest Carbon Initiatives Screenshot References: What Is Needed to Make REDD+ Work on the Ground: Lessons Learned from Pilot Forest Carbon Initiatives[1] About "At the United Nations climate negotiations in Copenhagen on December 2009,

274

June 1,1998, Issue No. 15 For Second Quarter FY 1998 NEPA Compliance Officers Meet in DC  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

,1998, Issue No. 15 For Second Quarter FY 1998 ,1998, Issue No. 15 For Second Quarter FY 1998 NEPA Compliance Officers Meet in DC How can NEPA Compliance Officers (NCOs) become more effective? What can the Offices of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) and General Counsel (GC) do to better support the NCOs? Field and Program NCOs and staff of the Offces of NEPA Policy and Assistance and the Assistant General Counsel for Environment met in Washington, DC, on March 26 and 27 to explore these questions. needs for their Offices and spoke of the value of the Lessons Learned Quarterly Report in Department-wide NEPA coordination. NCOs with tasks under the DOE-wide NEPA support contracts expressed satisfaction that the expected benefits (reduced time and cost) are materializing. A panel told of experiences integrating

275

Request Access to the PARSIIe Project Management Lessons Learned (PMLL) Repository  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The page identifies the process by which PARSIIe username/password is issued to Users who only require access to the PARSIIe Project Management Lessons Learned (PMLL) Repository.

276

The Effect of the Recovery Act on the River Corridor Closure Project: Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This summary report provides a high-level lessons learned by WCH of the impact to its project performance. The context is limited to the WCH project alone.

Mackay, S. M.

2012-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

277

Lesson Learned by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity-level Work Planning and Control  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Donna J. Governor, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lessons Learned by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity-Level Work Planning & Control.

278

Mini-Guidance Articles from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

by the DOE Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance in consultation with the Office of General Counsel, the DOE NEPA Community, and others. The mini-guidance articles were...

279

Waste management policy revisions: lessons learned from the Katrina disaster  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The main objective of this paper is to identify debris and waste management policies that need to be changed based on the lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina. Policy issues addressed include fragmented jurisdictional problems, issues related to types of debris, burning of house hold debris, wood infestation with Formosan termites and banning of yard wastes from landfills. Current practices and trends in the building material waste management following disasters are examined from a building life cycle standpoint or cradle to cradle concept. Completing the proper planning before the disaster is critical. Having a plan in place can allow for maximum, integrated recycling, resource optimisation, waste reduction and deconstruction. Examination of the waste management hierarchy and life cycle management of material is used to improve the understanding of reuse and recycle opportunities. Based on the lessons learnt from Hurricane Katrina proposed changes in debris management policy following natural disasters.

William E. Roper

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

EM ARRA Best Practices and Lessons Learned Workshop: Oak Ridge  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Learned Learned Oak Ridge Presenter: Sue Cange EM ARRA BEST PRACTICES and LESSONS LEARNED WORKSHOP Waste Management Symposium Phoenix, AZ www.em.doe.gov 1 March 1, 2012 Oak Ridge Overview of Best Practice or Opportunity pp y Working closely together, the Y-12 Site M&O Contractor, the ORO Reservation disposal cell, DOE-EM, and the Regulators crafted a technically defensible, yet very cost effective characterization program in an effort to rapidly D&D two buildings that were part of the Y-12 ARRA scope. This characterization program should serve DOE-EM well as a new scope s c a ac e a o p og a s ou d se e O e as a e characterization model for disposal of extremely low-level, low risk facilities in the on- reservation disposal cell. Benefit (actual or anticipated) Benefit (actual or anticipated)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Solid-State Lighting: Early Lessons Learned on the Way to Market  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to document early challenges and lessons learned in the solid-state lighting (SSL) market development as part of the DOEs SSL Program efforts to continually evaluate market progress in this area. This report summarizes early actions taken by DOE and others to avoid potential problems anticipated based on lessons learned from the market introduction of compact fluorescent lamps and identifies issues, challenges, and new lessons that have been learned in the early stages of the SSL market introduction. This study identifies and characterizes12 key lessons that have been distilled from DOE SSL program results.

Sandahl, Linda J.; Cort, Katherine A.; Gordon, Kelly L.

2013-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

282

PUREX/UO{sub 3} facilities deactivation lessons learned: History  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In May 1997, a historic deactivation project at the PUREX (Plutonium URanium EXtraction) facility at the Hanford Site in south-central Washington State concluded its activities (Figure ES-1). The project work was finished at $78 million under its original budget of $222.5 million, and 16 months ahead of schedule. Closely watched throughout the US Department of Energy (DOE) complex and by the US Department of Defense for the value of its lessons learned, the PUREX Deactivation Project has become the national model for the safe transition of contaminated facilities to shut down status.

Gerber, M.S.

1997-11-25T23:59:59.000Z

283

Computational design of ICCP systems: Lessons learned and future directions  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Computational modeling using boundary element techniques has been proposed for design and evaluation of shipboard impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) systems. LaPlace's equation, the governing differential equation for electrochemical corrosion, is well suited for solution by the boundary element method. There has been much work performed in this field during the past two decades. Computational modeling efforts designed to validate boundary element procedures are reviewed. US Navy ship systems discussed are CG-59, CG-66, and CVN-068. Computational analysis accuracy is determined by comparison with physical scale modeling experimental results. Lessons learned from the analysis described are summarized. Advantages and disadvantages of boundary element modeling are discussed.

DeGiorgi, V.G.; Lucas, K.E.

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Closure of a mixed waste landfill: Lessons learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Much experience has been gained during the closure of the Mixed Waste Management Facility (MWMF) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) and many lessons were learned. This knowledge was applied to other closures at SRS yielding decreased costs, schedule enhancement, and increased overall project efficiency. The next major area of experience to be gained at SRS in the field of waste site closures will be in the upkeep, maintenance, and monitoring of clay caps. Further test programs will be required to address these requirements.

Phifer, M.A.

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

Closure of a mixed waste landfill: Lessons learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Much experience has been gained during the closure of the Mixed Waste Management Facility (MWMF) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) and many lessons were learned. This knowledge was applied to other closures at SRS yielding decreased costs, schedule enhancement, and increased overall project efficiency. The next major area of experience to be gained at SRS in the field of waste site closures will be in the upkeep, maintenance, and monitoring of clay caps. Further test programs will be required to address these requirements.

Phifer, M.A.

1990-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

286

Website Collects EM's D&D Lessons Learned | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Website Collects EM's D&D Lessons Learned Website Collects EM's D&D Lessons Learned Website Collects EM's D&D Lessons Learned September 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis This photo is included in a report that discusses worker protective suits. The report is part of the lessons learned, best practices and other guidance now featured in the Deactivation and Decommissioning Knowledge Management Information Tool. The worker pictured, an insulator, is wearing a protective suit designed to fit better around the respirator and allow for improved breathing. This photo is included in a report that discusses worker protective suits. The report is part of the lessons learned, best practices and other guidance now featured in the Deactivation and Decommissioning Knowledge Management Information Tool. The worker pictured, an insulator, is wearing

287

Website Collects EM's D&D Lessons Learned | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Website Collects EM's D&D Lessons Learned Website Collects EM's D&D Lessons Learned Website Collects EM's D&D Lessons Learned September 30, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis This photo is included in a report that discusses worker protective suits. The report is part of the lessons learned, best practices and other guidance now featured in the Deactivation and Decommissioning Knowledge Management Information Tool. The worker pictured, an insulator, is wearing a protective suit designed to fit better around the respirator and allow for improved breathing. This photo is included in a report that discusses worker protective suits. The report is part of the lessons learned, best practices and other guidance now featured in the Deactivation and Decommissioning Knowledge Management Information Tool. The worker pictured, an insulator, is wearing

288

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 3,2002, Issue 31  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 2002 June 2002 1 “We must change some of our thinking on how we implement NEPA to get a more flexible outcome within our basic NEPA process,” advises Beverly Cook, DOE’s new Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health. “DOE’s NEPA Program is mature, with many years of experience in environmental reviews that add value to decisionmaking. But we need to better accommodate technical and policy changes that develop while an EIS is in preparation,” she said in a recent interview with staff of the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance. Formerly a senior manager of DOE Field, Program, and contractor organizations, and now the Assistant Secretary responsible for DOE’s NEPA program, Ms. Cook has experienced NEPA from a range of perspectives: from generating

289

Lessons Learned Quarterly Report Archive | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA process. As noted in articles on recently issued DOE EISs (Complex Transformation, Yucca Mountain Repository and Railroad, and Western Energy Corridors), DOE has received...

290

DOE Issues 81st Lessons Learned Quarterly Report | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

and Renewable Energy's Environmental Questionnaire for funding proposals, and a sustainability rating system. Also featured are thoughts on NEPA quality, training and schedules...

291

LESSONS LEARNED IN AEROSOL MONITORING WITH THE RASA  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Radionuclide Aerosol Sampler/Analyzer (RASA) is an automated aerosol collection and analysis system designed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in the 1990's and is deployed in several locations around the world as part of the International Monitoring System (IMS) required under the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). The RASA operates unattended, save for regularly scheduled maintenance, iterating samples through a three-step process on a 24-hour interval. In its 15-year history, much has been learned from the operation and maintenance of the RASA that can benefit engineering updates or future aerosol systems. On 11 March 2011, a 9.0 magnitude earthquake and tsunami rocked the eastern coast of Japan, resulting in power loss and cooling failures at the Daiichi nuclear power plants in Fukushima Prefecture. Aerosol collections were conducted with the RASA in Richland, WA. We present a summary of the lessons learned over the history of the RASA, including lessons taken from the Fukushima incident, regarding the RASA IMS stations operated by the United States.

Forrester, Joel B.; Bowyer, Ted W.; Carty, Fitz; Comes, Laura; Eslinger, Paul W.; Greenwood, Lawrence R.; Haas, Derek A.; Hayes, James C.; Kirkham, Randy R.; Lepel, Elwood A.; Litke, Kevin E.; Miley, Harry S.; Morris, Scott J.; Schrom, Brian T.; Van Davelaar, Peter; Woods, Vincent T.

2011-09-14T23:59:59.000Z

292

NEPA Documentation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Note for: Cynthia Quarterman Note for: Cynthia Quarterman Keith Harper From: Carol Borgstrom Subject: NEPA Documentation Date: December 3, 2008 Attached, per your request, are two lists: (1) DOE environmental assessments (EAs) issued since 12/1/2006 and (2) DOE environmental impact statements (EISs) issued since 12/1/2006. Also, per your request, is a copy of a general NEPA briefing provided to the Acting Deputy Secretary in May 2008. Please let me know if you have any further questions (carol.borgstrom @hq.doe.gov; 202-586-4600). cc: Ingrid Kolb, MA-1 (without attachments) Janet Barsy, GC-1 EA Database Listing Document Start FONSI Months Total NEPA Cost Program Number Title Date Date Complete Ops Office Office DOE/EA-1389 Charlie Creek-Williston Transmission 3/20/2001 2/20/2008 83.2 $345,236.21 WAPA

293

Lessons Learned From Developing Reactor Pressure Vessel Steel Embrittlement Database  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Materials behaviors caused by neutron irradiation under fission and/or fusion environments can be little understood without practical examination. Easily accessible material information system with large material database using effective computers is necessary for design of nuclear materials and analyses or simulations of the phenomena. The developed Embrittlement Data Base (EDB) at ORNL is this comprehensive collection of data. EDB database contains power reactor pressure vessel surveillance data, the material test reactor data, foreign reactor data (through bilateral agreements authorized by NRC), and the fracture toughness data. The lessons learned from building EDB program and the associated database management activity regarding Material Database Design Methodology, Architecture and the Embedded QA Protocol are described in this report. The development of IAEA International Database on Reactor Pressure Vessel Materials (IDRPVM) and the comparison of EDB database and IAEA IDRPVM database are provided in the report. The recommended database QA protocol and database infrastructure are also stated in the report.

Wang, Jy-An John [ORNL

2010-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

SSL Early Lessons Learned on the Way to the Market  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

(SSL) has made impressive progress over the past decade, emerging as a promising new technology that could fundamentally alter and improve lighting systems, and significantly lower energy use and costs. Benefiting from lessons learned from the market introduction of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) in the 1980s and 1990s, actions taken by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), energy efficiency programs, and standards organizations have helped industry avoid some of the problems that plagued CFL market development. Standardized testing, minimum performance and reporting requirements, and publication of testing and demonstration results have made it more difficult for poor-performing SSL products to remain on the market, and rewarded manufacturers whose products perform well.

295

DOE EM Project Experience & Lessons Learned for In Situ Decommissioning  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM Project Experience & Lessons Learned for In Situ EM Project Experience & Lessons Learned for In Situ Decommissioning (Feb. 2013) DOE EM Project Experience & Lessons Learned for In Situ Decommissioning (Feb. 2013) The purpose of the "DOE EM Project Experience & Lessons Learned for In Situ Decommissioning" report is to capture the considerable technical experience gained to date for implementation of In Situ Decommissioning (ISD) projects at DOE facilities. As current and projected budgets for the EM program indicate reduced and flat funding profiles for the foreseeable future, the potential exists for this institutional knowledge to be lost as the ramp-down of project staffing commences with the cessation of ARRA. EM's Office of Deactivation & Decommissioning and Facility Engineering

296

Commissioning/Performance Verification- Review of Applications for UESC & Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation covers the review of applications for utillity energy service contract (UESC) applications and lessons learned. Presentation given at the Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) Spring 2008 meeting in Destin, Florida.

297

Solid-State Lighting: Early Lessons Learned on the Way to Market  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This February 20, 2014 webinar presented information from a new DOE report, Solid-State Lighting: Early Lessons Learned on the Way to Market. The SSL market continues to evolve rapidly and LED...

298

Lessons Learned in Optimizing Workers' and Worker Representatives' Input to Work Planning and Control  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Tom McQuiston, Dr. P.H., United Steelworkers - Tony Mazzocchi Center for Health, Safety and Environmental Education. Lessons Learned in Optimizing Workers and Worker Representatives Input in Work Planning and Control.

299

E-Print Network 3.0 - africa lessons learned Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Search Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: africa lessons learned Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 MSU at Work in Africa: A Unique Capacity...

300

Contractor Work Planning and Control Lessons Learned from DOE and International Projects  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Bob McQuinn; URS Global Management and Operations Services; Frank McCoy and Rick Runnels; URS - Professional Solutions. Contractor Work Planning and Control-URS Lessons Learned.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

SRS SLUDGE BATCH QUALIFICATION AND PROCESSING; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND LESSONS LEARNED  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report provides a historical overview and lessons learned associated with the SRS sludge batch (SB) qualification and processing programs. The report covers the framework of the requirements for waste form acceptance, the DWPF Glass Product Control Program (GPCP), waste feed acceptance, examples of how the program complies with the specifications, an overview of the Startup Program, and a summary of continuous improvements and lessons learned. The report includes a bibliography of previous reports and briefings on the topic.

Cercy, M.; Peeler, D.; Stone, M.

2013-09-25T23:59:59.000Z

302

NEPA Updates | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

NEPA Updates Subscribe to DOE NEPA - Latest Documents and Notices Subscribe to DOE NEPA News The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance maintains two notification services which...

303

59th Lessons Learned Quarterly Report, June 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DRAFT - June 2009 1 DRAFT - June 2009 1 "The Department of Energy is both privileged and challenged" by its critical role in implementing the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, said Matt Rogers, Senior Advisor to the Secretary, to DOE's NEPA Compliance Officers (NCOs) and NEPA staff from the Office of General Counsel at the NCO meeting in Washington, DC, on April 28-29, 2009. In the keynote address, Mr. Rogers cited DOE's intense efforts since late February to identify and approve projects for Recovery Act funding and the imminent need to address

304

Lessons Learned From Gen I Carbon Dioxide Cooled Reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper provides a review of early gas cooled reactors including the Magnox reactors originating in the United Kingdom and the subsequent development of the Advanced Gas-cooled Reactors (AGR). These early gas cooled reactors shared a common coolant medium, namely carbon dioxide (CO2). A framework of information is provided about these early reactors and identifies unique problems/opportunities associated with use of CO2 as a coolant. Reactor designers successfully rose to these challenges. After years of successful use of the CO2 gas cooled reactors in Europe, the succeeding generation of reactors, called the High Temperature Gas Reactors (HTGR), were designed with Helium gas as the coolant. Again, in the 21st century, with the latest reactor designs under investigation in Generation IV, there is a revived interest in developing Gas Cooled Fast Reactors that use CO2 as the reactor coolant. This paper provides a historical perspective on the 52 CO2 reactors and the reactor programs that developed them. The Magnox and AGR design features and safety characteristics were reviewed, as well as the technologies associated with fuel storage, reprocessing, and disposal. Lessons-learned from these programs are noted to benefit the designs of future generations of gas cooled nuclear reactors.

David E. Shropshire

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

Nuclear power plant Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL). Appendix B  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this generic aging lessons learned (GALL) review is to provide a systematic review of plant aging information in order to assess materials and component aging issues related to continued operation and license renewal of operating reactors. Literature on mechanical, structural, and thermal-hydraulic components and systems reviewed consisted of 97 Nuclear Plant Aging Research (NPAR) reports, 23 NRC Generic Letters, 154 Information Notices, 29 Licensee Event Reports (LERs), 4 Bulletins, and 9 Nuclear Management and Resources Council Industry Reports (NUMARC IRs) and literature on electrical components and systems reviewed consisted of 66 NPAR reports, 8 NRC Generic Letters, 111 Information Notices, 53 LERs, 1 Bulletin, and 1 NUMARC IR. More than 550 documents were reviewed. The results of these reviews were systematized using a standardized GALL tabular format and standardized definitions of aging-related degradation mechanisms and effects. The tables are included in volume s 1 and 2 of this report. A computerized data base has also been developed for all review tables and can be used to expedite the search for desired information on structures, components, and relevant aging effects. A survey of the GALL tables reveals that all ongoing significant component aging issues are currently being addressed by the regulatory process. However, the aging of what are termed passive components has been highlighted for continued scrutiny. This report consists of Volume 2, which consists of the GALL literature review tables for the NUMARC Industry Reports reviewed for the report.

Kasza, K.E.; Diercks, D.R.; Holland, J.W.; Choi, S.U. [and others

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

Contractor Work Planning and Control URS Lessons Learned | Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Environmental Management Work Planning and Control Oversight Integration of Safety Culture Attributes into EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guidance Document Lessons...

307

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

defining early what contractors should accomplish < establishing contracts ahead of time < minimizing cost while maintaining quality by * maximizing competition and use of incentives * using past performance information in awarding work * managing the NEPA process as a project This guidance provides: < model statements of work < information on contract types and incentives < direction on effective NEPA contract management by the NEPA Document Manager < a system for measuring NEPA process costs < NEPA contractor evaluation procedures < details on the DOE NEPA Web site U.S. Department of Energy, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance, December 1996 NEPA CONTRACTING REFORM GUIDANCE Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

308

Occurrence reporting and processing system (ORPS) lessons learned: Tools to improve workplace performance  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Various Department of Energy (DOE) orders require DOE and DOE contractor personnel to review abnormal events to gain lessons learned information. The term ``event`` is used to mean a real-time occurrence. When reviewing events data, it must be possible to determine what happened and why (including root causes), the impacts, the appropriate corrective actions, and any lessons learned that might be applicable to activities of other operations or contractors. Merely obtaining the information will not prevent occurrence of a similar event; contributing conditions must be corrected. It is important for managers, trainers, and others to learn from the events of others so that they may apply these experiences to their own activities. Reports of events must be analyzed to determine possible applicability to other facilities and/or job functions. Relevant information can then be used to correct defects and improve facilities and operations, thus making them more efficient and safer for all employees. Lessons learned information is particularly helpful in planning employee training and in developing training curriculum and programs. Lessons learned information can be obtained from many sources. It can be found in the Safety Performance Measurement System`s Computerized Accident/Incident Reporting System (CAIRS) module, the S&H Publications module, the Unusual Occurrence Reports module, and the Office of Nuclear Safety ``Operating Experience Weekly Summary.`` One important source of lessons teamed information is the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) database, which contains event data from September 1, 1990, to the present. This report discusses this source.

Commander, S.L.

1992-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

309

Occurrence reporting and processing system (ORPS) lessons learned: Tools to improve workplace performance  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Various Department of Energy (DOE) orders require DOE and DOE contractor personnel to review abnormal events to gain lessons learned information. The term event'' is used to mean a real-time occurrence. When reviewing events data, it must be possible to determine what happened and why (including root causes), the impacts, the appropriate corrective actions, and any lessons learned that might be applicable to activities of other operations or contractors. Merely obtaining the information will not prevent occurrence of a similar event; contributing conditions must be corrected. It is important for managers, trainers, and others to learn from the events of others so that they may apply these experiences to their own activities. Reports of events must be analyzed to determine possible applicability to other facilities and/or job functions. Relevant information can then be used to correct defects and improve facilities and operations, thus making them more efficient and safer for all employees. Lessons learned information is particularly helpful in planning employee training and in developing training curriculum and programs. Lessons learned information can be obtained from many sources. It can be found in the Safety Performance Measurement System's Computerized Accident/Incident Reporting System (CAIRS) module, the S H Publications module, the Unusual Occurrence Reports module, and the Office of Nuclear Safety Operating Experience Weekly Summary.'' One important source of lessons teamed information is the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) database, which contains event data from September 1, 1990, to the present. This report discusses this source.

Commander, S.L.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors Lessons Learned Applicable to the Next Generation Nuclear Plant  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to identify possible issues highlighted by these lessons learned that could apply to the NGNP in reducing technical risks commensurate with the current phase of design. Some of the lessons learned have been applied to the NGNP and documented in the Preconceptual Design Report. These are addressed in the background section of this document and include, for example, the decision to use TRISO fuel rather than BISO fuel used in the Peach Bottom reactor; the use of a reactor pressure vessel rather than prestressed concrete found in Fort St. Vrain; and the use of helium as a primary coolant rather than CO2. Other lessons learned, 68 in total, are documented in Sections 2 through 6 and will be applied, as appropriate, in advancing phases of design. The lessons learned are derived from both negative and positive outcomes from prior HTGR experiences. Lessons learned are grouped according to the plant, areas, systems, subsystems, and components defined in the NGNP Preconceptual Design Report, and subsequent NGNP project documents.

J. M. Beck; L. F. Pincock

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Lessons Learned in International Safeguards - Implementation of Safeguards at the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The focus of this report is lessons learned at the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP). However, the subject of lessons learned for application of international safeguards at reprocessing plants includes a cumulative history of inspections starting at the West Valley (New York, U.S.A.) reprocessing plant in 1969 and proceeding through all of the efforts over the years. The RRP is the latest and most challenging application the International Atomic Energy Agency has faced. In many ways the challenges have remained the same, timely inspection and evaluation with limited inspector resources, with the continuing realization that planning and preparations can never start early enough in the life cycle of a facility. Lessons learned over the years have involved the challenges of using ongoing advances in technology and dealing with facilities with increased throughput and continuous operation. This report will begin with a review of historical developments and lessons learned. This will provide a basis for a discussion of the experiences and lessons learned from the implementation of international safeguards at RRP.

Ehinger, Michael H [ORNL; Johnson, Shirley [Tucker Creek Consulting

2010-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

Lessons learned from applying VIM to fast reactor critical experiments  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

VIM is a continuous energy Monte Carlo code first developed around 1970 for the analysis of plate-type, fast-neutron, zero-power critical assemblies. In most respects, VIM is functionally equivalent to the MCNP code but it has two features that make uniquely suited to the analysis of fast reactor critical experiments: (1) the plate lattice geometry option, which allows efficient description of and neutron tracking in the assembly geometry, and (2) a statistical treatment of neutron cross section data in the unresolved resonance range. Since its inception, VIM`s capabilities have expanded to include numerous features, such as thermal neutron cross sections, photon cross sections, and combinatorial and other geometry options, that have allowed its use in a wide range of neutral-particle transport problems. The earliest validation work at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) focused on the validation of VIM itself. This work showed that, in order for VIM to be a ``rigorous`` tool, extreme detail in the pointwise Monte Carlo libraries was needed, and the required detail was added. The emphasis soon shifted to validating models, methods, data and codes against VIM. Most of this work was done in the context of analyzing critical experiments in zero power reactor (ZPR) assemblies. The purpose of this paper is to present some of the lessons learned from using VIM in ZPR analysis work. This involves such areas as uncovering problems in deterministic methods and models, pitfalls in using Monte Carlo codes, and improving predictions. The numerical illustrations included here were taken from the extensive documentation cited as references.

Schaefer, R.W.; McKnight, R.D.; Collins, P.J.

1995-05-17T23:59:59.000Z

313

EM Sites Come Together to Share Lessons Learned on Safety | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sites Come Together to Share Lessons Learned on Safety Sites Come Together to Share Lessons Learned on Safety EM Sites Come Together to Share Lessons Learned on Safety August 7, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Members of the Hanford site team observe Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project workers at the Idaho site putting on protective equipment. The Level B protective suit is custom-designed to provide maximum flexibility and protection against potential workplace hazards. The containment suit, coupled with the breathing equipment shown in the photo below, enables work to be conducted safely in high-hazard atmospheres. Members of the Hanford site team observe Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project workers at the Idaho site putting on protective equipment. The Level B protective suit is custom-designed to provide maximum flexibility

314

Some Lessons Learned from 20 Years in RedOx Flow Battery R&d  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

lessons learned from 20 years in lessons learned from 20 years in RedOx Flow Battery R&D Dr Steve Clarke, CEO Applied Intellectual Capital, Alameda CAc DOE Workshop Washington DC March 2012 www.apicap.com Contents ● AIC's involvement in RFB R&D ● Some key lessons learned ● Some remaining challenges to be overcome 2 Applied Intellectual Capital ● Technology consulting  Electrochemical and materials focus  Clients include leading industrials, VCs, DOE, DOD and EPA  33,000 ft. facility for laboratory, engineering, rapid prototyping and testing ● Technology venturing (own micro- fund)  IP generated by consulting and R&D  Leverages labs, facilities and consulting successes ● Combined resources  Proven business development team  Start-up to IPO

315

NASA Benchmarks Lessons Learned Assessment Plan - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LESSONS LEARNED LESSONS LEARNED Assessment Plan Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division Performance Objective: Management should have an established Lessons Learned Program with an effective system to continuously distribute information of improvement in safe operations to all affected personnel. Criteria: Timely and effective action is taken to track and correct identified deficiencies and to prevent their recurrence by addressing their basic causes and related generic problems. (DOE/EH-0135) Management installs an effective corrective action program (caWeb) for safety-related issues, wherein records are updated and actions are tracked through completion. (DOE/EH-0135) Management uses the corrective action program (caWeb) as the database to analyze safety issues, implement corrective actions, and define

316

Microsoft Word - 08-02-06 Security Lessons Learned TEC Security Topic Group.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, Final 6, Final 1 DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation: Lessons Learned from Security Planning and Execution OCRWM has reviewed lessons learned from past high visibility Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) and other radioactive material shipping campaigns. The objective was to identify trends and commonalities from past DOE shipping campaigns, which could be considered when planning for the development and operation of a national transportation system to fulfill requirements of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA). The study examined specific planning, business, institutional and operating practices that have been identified by DOE, its transportation contractors, and stakeholders as important issues that arise repeatedly. In addition, lessons learned or activities/actions which were found not to be

317

Demand Response: Lessons Learned with an Eye to the Future | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Demand Response: Lessons Learned with an Eye to the Future Demand Response: Lessons Learned with an Eye to the Future Demand Response: Lessons Learned with an Eye to the Future July 11, 2013 - 11:56am Addthis Patricia A. Hoffman Patricia A. Hoffman Assistant Secretary, Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability In today's world of limited resources and rising costs, everyone is looking for ways to use what they have more effectively while, at the same time, controlling - and ideally - reducing expenses. The electricity industry is no exception. Through demand response programs such as time-based rates in which customers are offered financial incentives to reduce or shift their consumption during peak periods, utilities are reducing demand and better managing their assets while also giving consumers more options and lowering the cost of electricity. For example,

318

EM Delegation Shares Lessons Learned on Tour in France | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM Delegation Shares Lessons Learned on Tour in France EM Delegation Shares Lessons Learned on Tour in France EM Delegation Shares Lessons Learned on Tour in France June 5, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis The EM delegation tours the underground installations of the Underground Research Laboratory in France; EM Lead International Affairs Specialist Ana Han, left to right, EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Frank Marcinowski, Carlsbad Field Office Manager Joe Franco and EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga. The EM delegation tours the underground installations of the Underground Research Laboratory in France; EM Lead International Affairs Specialist Ana Han, left to right, EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Frank Marcinowski, Carlsbad Field Office Manager Joe Franco and EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga.

319

EM Delegation Shares Lessons Learned on Tour in France | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Shares Lessons Learned on Tour in France Shares Lessons Learned on Tour in France EM Delegation Shares Lessons Learned on Tour in France June 5, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis The EM delegation tours the underground installations of the Underground Research Laboratory in France; EM Lead International Affairs Specialist Ana Han, left to right, EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Frank Marcinowski, Carlsbad Field Office Manager Joe Franco and EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga. The EM delegation tours the underground installations of the Underground Research Laboratory in France; EM Lead International Affairs Specialist Ana Han, left to right, EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Frank Marcinowski, Carlsbad Field Office Manager Joe Franco and EM Senior Advisor Dave Huizenga.

320

Lessons Learned from Net Zero Energy Assessments and Renewable Energy Projects at Military Installations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned from Lessons Learned from Net Zero Energy Assessments and Renewable Energy Projects at Military Installations Michael Callahan, Kate Anderson, Sam Booth, Jessica Katz, and Tim Tetreault Technical Report NREL/TP-7A40-51598 Revised September 2011 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Lessons Learned from Net Zero Energy Assessments and Renewable Energy Projects at Military Installations Michael Callahan, Kate Anderson, Sam Booth, Jessica Katz, and Tim Tetreault

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

NEPA | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

NEPA NEPA Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home NEPA Casual Use Determination of NEPA Adequacy Categorical Exclusion Environmental Assessment Environmental Impact Statements Print PDF NEPA-Related Documents General Document Collections (178) Documents Regulatory Roadmap FONSI Graphic illustrating the components of the NEPA process. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) - Enacted in 1970, NEPA established a national policy to encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment and to promote the prevention and elimination of damage to the environment and biosphere. At the heart of NEPA is the requirement that federal agencies or departments must consider the environmental impacts of all major federal

322

Lessons Learned from Net Zero Energy Assessments and Renewable Energy Projects at Military Installations  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Report highlights the increase in resources, project speed, and scale required to achieve the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) energy efficiency and renewable energy goals. It also summarizes the net zero energy installation assessment (NZEI) process and the lessons learned from NZEI assessments and large-scale renewable energy projects implementations at DoD installations.

323

NASA/TP-2006-214203 Logistics Lessons Learned in NASA Space Flight  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NASA/TP-2006-214203 Logistics Lessons Learned in NASA Space Flight William A. (Andy) Evans, United 2006 #12;NASA STI Program ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the advancement of aeronautics and space science. The NASA scientific and technical information (STI) program plays a key part

de Weck, Olivier L.

324

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Lessons Learned: Application of Small UAV for Urban  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1 Lessons Learned: Application of Small UAV vehicles (UAVs) have great potentials as a part of ITS infrastructure for providing quick and real-time aerial video images of large surface area to the ground. Despite of obvious advantages of UAVs

Dong, Liang

325

Realizing Clean Energy's Potential: Lessons Learned in the U.S. West (Technical Report)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

NREL Analysis Insights connects the dots between NREL studies, pulling big picture insights from a larger body of work. In the premiere issue of our new periodical Analysis Insights, we explore lessons learned from experience in the U.S. West for realizing clean energy's potential.

Not Available

2014-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

Joint ATLAS/CMS SLHC Opto WG 1 K.K. Gan Lesson Learned from  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Joint ATLAS/CMS SLHC Opto WG 1 K.K. Gan Lesson Learned from ATLAS Pixel Optical Link #12;Joint ATLAS/CMS SLHC Opto WG 2 Outline Introduction VCSEL/PIN monitoring Analysis of opto-board/VCSEL/PIN failures Summary K.K. Gan #12;K.K. Gan Joint ATLAS/CMS SLHC Opto WG 3 Introduction Architecture

Gan, K. K.

327

Cloud-Climate Feedback: Lessons Learned From Two El nio Events  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Cloud-Climate Feedback: Lessons Learned From Two El niño Events Minghua Zhang Institute - ABSTRACT Monthly ERBE and CERES measurements are used to study the response of cloud radiative forcing that the response of cloud forcing to SST over the whole tropics is very different from that to local SST changes

Zhang, Minghua

328

Lessons learned from structures damaged by delayed ettringite formation and the French  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Lessons learned from structures damaged by delayed ettringite formation and the French prevention Ettringite Formation (DEF) can damage concrete structures severely. The primary ettringite (a hydrous calcium slow formation of higher volume secondary ettringite may occur as water is taken into the crystal

Boyer, Edmond

329

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Analysis: Lessons Learned from Stationary Power Generation Final Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This study considered opportunities for hydrogen in stationary applications in order to make recommendations related to RD&D strategies that incorporate lessons learned and best practices from relevant national and international stationary power efforts, as well as cost and environmental modeling of pathways. The study analyzed the different strategies utilized in power generation systems and identified the different challenges and opportunities for producing and using hydrogen as an energy carrier. Specific objectives included both a synopsis/critical analysis of lessons learned from previous stationary power programs and recommendations for a strategy for hydrogen infrastructure deployment. This strategy incorporates all hydrogen pathways and a combination of distributed power generating stations, and provides an overview of stationary power markets, benefits of hydrogen-based stationary power systems, and competitive and technological challenges. The motivation for this project was to identify the lessons learned from prior stationary power programs, including the most significant obstacles, how these obstacles have been approached, outcomes of the programs, and how this information can be used by the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells & Infrastructure Technologies Program to meet program objectives primarily related to hydrogen pathway technologies (production, storage, and delivery) and implementation of fuel cell technologies for distributed stationary power. In addition, the lessons learned address environmental and safety concerns, including codes and standards, and education of key stakeholders.

Scott E. Grasman; John W. Sheffield; Fatih Dogan; Sunggyu Lee; Umit O. Koylu; Angie Rolufs

2010-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

330

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Each Federal agency is required to develop NEPA procedures that supplement the CEQ Regulations. Developed in consultation with CEQ, Federal agency NEPA procedures must meet the standards in the CEQ...

331

NEPA Stakeholders Directory  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Policy Act N E P A DIRECTORY of POTENTIAL STAKEHOLDERS for DOE ACTIONS under NEPA 28 th Edition July 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance United States Government Department of Energy memorandum DATE: July 28, 201 1 REPLY TO ATN OF: Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (C. Chen, GC-54,202-586-0733) SUBJECT: Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA: 2gth Edition TO: DOE NEPA Community I am pleased to announce that the 2sth edition of the Directory of Potential Stakeholders for DOE Actions under NEPA, dated July 20 1 1, is now posted on the DOE NEPA website (http://ne-pa. enerm. gov/documents/StakeholdersDirectory. pdfl. The Directory is intended to supplement distribution lists that DOE Offices compile for particular projects or facilities

332

Lessons Learned at the Nevada National Security Site Implementing the EFCOG Activity-level Work Planning and Control Guide  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Steele Coddington, Work Planning Manager, National Security Technologies, Nevada National Security Site. Lessons Learned Implementing Work Planning & Control. 6 Step Process for improving WP&C.

333

DOEs Save Energy Now Assessments Results and Lessons Learned from 450 Assessments Conducted in 2006-2007  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DOE?s Save Energy Now Assessments ? Results and Lessons Learned from 450 Assessments Conducted in 2006 ? 2007 ABSTRACT Michaela Martin, martinma@ornl.gov Anthony Wright, wrightal@ornl.gov Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN...

Martin, M.; Wright, A.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

EM Recovery Act Program Lessons Learned Report to Congress: November...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Learned Report to Congress: November 2012 DOE report in response to the House Conference Report 112-118, Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill, 2012, Public Law...

335

Lessons Learned... and Not Learned: A Case Study in Regulatory Evolution  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

'Are you better off than you were four years ago?' 'You've come a long way, baby.' Eschewing politics and advertising, these idioms are applied to the evolution of regulatory processes for Decontamination and Decommissioning (D and D) of nuclear facilities. We use a case study of a (nearly) completed D and D project at a large nuclear fuel manufacturing facility, to chronicle one licensee's experience with US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) D and D regulations from the 1990's to the present. Historical milestones include the birth of a D and D project, a false start and resultant consequences, a D and D 'moratorium' with subsequent planning and stakeholder integration, a second start which included the challenge of parallel path D and D physical work and regulatory processes, and the 'lessons learned' contributions to timely project progress. Further discussion includes a look at the 'declaration of victory' and examines what it really means to be finished. The rich contextual experience from the case study and the observations of other industry members provides the basis for answers to several key questions: How far has the regulatory process for D and D really evolved, and in what direction? Are licensees generally satisfied or dissatisfied with the methods? What has not improved? Which improvements looked promising, but languished in recent years? How far have we really come and are we better off? What are the opportunities for further improvement? The summary answer to each question, using compendious engineering terms is... 'it depends'. (authors)

Conant, J. F. [ABB Inc., 2000 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT 06095 (United States); Woodard, R. C. [TLG Services/Entergy, 148 New Milford Road East, Bridgewater, CT 06752 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Spent Nuclear Fuel Trasportation: An Examination of Potential Lessons Learned From Prior Shipping Campaigns  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (NWPA), as amended, assigned the Department of Energy (DOE) responsibility for developing and managing a Federal system for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW). The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) is responsible for accepting, transporting, and disposing of SNF and HLW at the Yucca Mountain repository (if licensed) in a manner that protects public health, safety, and the environment; enhances national and energy security; and merits public confidence. OCRWM faces a near-term challenge--to develop and demonstrate a transportation system that will sustain safe and efficient shipments of SNF and HLW to a repository. To better inform and improve its current planning, OCRWM has extensively reviewed plans and other documents related to past high-visibility shipping campaigns of SNF and other radioactive materials within the United States. This report summarizes the results of this review and, where appropriate, lessons learned. The objective of this lessons learned study was to identify successful, best-in-class trends and commonalities from past shipping campaigns, which OCRWM could consider when planning for the development and operation of a repository transportation system. Note: this paper is for analytical and discussion purposes only, and is not an endorsement of, or commitment by, OCRWM to follow any of the comments or trends. If OCRWM elects to make such commitments at a future time, they will be appropriately documented in formal programmatic policy statements, plans and procedures. Reviewers examined an extensive study completed in 2003 by DOE's National Transportation Program (NTP), Office of Environmental Management (EM), as well as plans and documents related to SNF shipments since issuance of the NTP report. OCRWM examined specific planning, business, institutional and operating practices that have been identified by DOE, its transportation contractors, and stakeholders as important issues that arise repeatedly. In addition, the review identifies lessons learned or activities/actions which were found not to be productive to the planning and conduct of SNF shipments (i.e., negative impacts). This paper is a 'looking back' summary of lessons learned across multiple transportation campaigns. Not all lessons learned are captured here, and participants in some of the campaigns have divergent opinions and perspectives about which lessons are most critical. This analysis is part of a larger OCRWM benchmarking effort to identify best practices to consider in future transportation of radioactive materials ('looking forward'). Initial findings from this comprehensive benchmarking analysis are expected to be available in late fall 2006.

M. Keister; K, McBride

2006-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

337

September 10, 2003, Board Public Meeting Presentations - Lessons Learned from Nuclear Power Industry  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DAVIS DAVIS - - BESSE REACTOR VESSEL HEAD DEGRADATION BESSE REACTOR VESSEL HEAD DEGRADATION LESSONS LEARNED TASK FORCE LESSONS LEARNED TASK FORCE DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC MEETING September 10, 2003 September 10, 2003 Ed Hackett, Project Director Ed Hackett, Project Director Project Directorate II Project Directorate II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission EMH1@NRC.GOV EMH1@NRC.GOV DAVIS DAVIS - - BESSE RACTOR VESSEL HEAD DEGRADATION BESSE RACTOR VESSEL HEAD DEGRADATION BACKGROUND BACKGROUND FEBRUARY, 2002 FEBRUARY, 2002 -

338

Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen; Workshop Proceedings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Refueling Infrastructure for Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen Workshop Proceedings M.W. Melaina National Renewable Energy Laboratory S. McQueen and J. Brinch Energetics Incorporated Sacramento, California April 3, 2008 Proceedings NREL/BK-560-43669 July 2008 NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Refueling Infrastructure for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Lessons Learned for Hydrogen Workshop Proceedings M.W. Melaina National Renewable Energy Laboratory S. McQueen and J. Brinch Energetics Incorporated Sacramento, California April 3, 2008 Prepared under Task No. H278.2350 Proceedings NREL/BK-560-43669 July 2008 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393

339

Commissioning / Performance Verification - Review of Applications for UESC & Lessons Learned  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Commissioning/Performance Commissioning/Performance Commissioning/Performance Verification Verification - - Review of Applications Review of Applications for UESC & Lessons Learned for UESC & Lessons Learned Edward Thibodo Edward Thibodo NAVFAC Southwest NAVFAC Southwest April 16, 2008 April 16, 2008 The Way it Was The Way it Was * * When asked about When asked about M & V M & V * * Response was why, Response was why, this is not an ESPC? this is not an ESPC? The Way it Was The Way it Was * * Develop Project D s evelop Projects * * Awarded Project A s warded Projects * * Develop More Pro D jects evelop More Projects * * Awarded More Pro A jects warded More Projects * * Develop More Projects Develop More Projects * * Awarded More Projects Awarded More Projects * * Develop More Project D s evelop More Projects * * Awarded More Project

340

Federal NEPA Contacts  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

CEQ and most Federal agencies identify primary points of contact for NEPA compliance. Normally a senior environmental professional, environmental law attorney, or member of agency leadership, these...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Olympia Oyster Library Research Project With this lesson students learn about the ecology and conservation of an oyster native to Puget  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Olympia Oyster Library Research Project With this lesson students learn about the ecology a hypothesis explaining why Olympia oyster populations are declining in Liberty Bay, Washington. Several

Carrington, Emily

342

Lesson Learned by CHPRC at Hanford Activity-level Work Planning and Control Using EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guideline Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Jim Hoffman, CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company. Major Process Revision of WP&C Lessons Learned.

343

Hard lessons: effort-inducing interfaces benefit spatial learning  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Interface designers normally strive for a design that minimises the user's effort. However, when the design's objective is to train users to interact with interfaces that are highly dependent on spatial properties (e.g. keypad layout or gesture shapes) ... Keywords: education, gesture stroke, learning, pen input, skill acquisition, spatial memory, text entry, training

Andy Cockburn; Per Ola Kristensson; Jason Alexander; Shumin Zhai

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

Driving Demand: Lessons From Vermont  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Describes the Efficiency Vermont program and provides lessons learned in marketing and development of creative strategies.

345

Mini-Guidance Articles from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports, Dec. 1994 to Sept. 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The articles in this collection, organized by topic, contain procedural interpretations and recommendations developed by the DOE Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance in consultation with the Office of General Counsel, the DOE NEPA Community, and others. The mini-guidance articles were developed to address problems identified in the course of preparing, reviewing, and issuing NEPA documents.

346

Lessons learned from the Three Mile Island Unit 2 Advisory Panel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In response to public concern about the cleanup of the Three Mile Island, Unit 2 (TMI-2) facility after an accident on March 28, 1979 involving a loss of reactor coolant and subsequent damage to the reactor fuel, twelve citizens were asked to serve on an independent Advisory Panel to consult with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on the decontamination and cleanup of the facility. The panel met 78 times over a period of thirteen years, holding public meetings in the vicinity of TMI-2 and meeting regularly with NRC Commissioners in Washington, DC. This report describes the results of a project designed to identify and describe the lessons learned from the Advisory Panel and place those lessons in the context of what we generally know about citizen advisory groups. A summary of the empirical literature on citizen advisory panels is followed by a brief history of the TMI-2 Advisory Panel. The body of the report contains the analysis of the lessons learned, preliminary conclusions about the effectiveness of the Panel, and implications for the NRC in the use of advisory panels. Data for the report include meeting transcripts and interviews with past and present Panel participants.

Lach, D.; Bolton, P.; Durbin, N. [Battelle Seattle Research Center, WA (United States); Harty, R. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

Lessons Learned During the Manufacture of the NCSX Modular Coils  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Compact Stellarator Experiment's (NCSX) modular coils presented a number of engineering and manufacturing challenges due to their complex shapes, requirements for high dimensional accuracy and high current density requirements due to space constraints. Being the first of their kind, these coils required the implementation of many new manufacturing and measuring techniques and procedures. This was the first time that these manufacturing techniques and methods were applied in the production of coils at the laboratory. This resulted in a steep learning curve for the first several coils. Through the effective use of procedures, tooling modifications, involvement and ownership by the manufacturing workforce, and an emphasis on safety, the assembly team was able to reduce the manufacturing times and improve upon the manufacturing methods. This paper will discuss the learning curve and steps that were taken to improve the manufacturing efficiency and reduce the manufacturing times for the modular coils without forfeiting quality.

James H. Chrzanowski,Thomas G. Meighan, Steven Raftopoulos and Lawrence Dudek and Paul J. Fogarty

2009-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

348

Designing and Operating for Safeguards: Lessons Learned From the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper will address the lessons learned during the implementation of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards at the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP) which are relevant to the issue of safeguards by design. However, those lessons are a result of a cumulative history of international safeguards experiences starting with the West Valley reprocessing plant in 1969, continuing with the Barnwell plant, and then with the implementation of international safeguards at WAK in Germany and TRP in Japan. The design and implementation of safeguards at RRP in Japan is the latest and most challenging that the IAEA has faced. This paper will discuss the work leading up to the development of a safeguards approach, the design and operating features that were introduced to improve or aid in implementing the safeguards approach, and the resulting recommendations for future facilities. It will provide an overview of how safeguardability was introduced into RRP.

Johnson, Shirley J.; Ehinger, Michael

2010-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

349

Audience/Panel Discussion: Sites Lesson Learned about Activity-level Work Planning and Control Using EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guideline  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Donna J. Governor, Deputy Dept Mgr for Planning & Integration, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory work planning and control lessons learned and audience/panel discussion on site's lessons learned about Activity-level Work Planning and Control using EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guideline Document.

350

EM SSAB ITR Landfill Assessment Project Lessons Learned Presentation - July 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Teleconference: Teleconference: 1. DOE EM ITR Landfill Assessment Project: Lessons Learned Craig H. Benson, PhD, PE CRESP July 2009 1 Independent Technical Review Team * Craig H. Benson, PhD, PE - University of Wisconsin-Madison: waste containment systems, civil engineering, geotechnical engineering. * William H. Albright, PhD - Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada: waste containment systems, hydrology, regulatory interactions. * David P. Ray, PE - US Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha, NB: waste containment systems, civil engineering, geotechnical engineering. * John Smegal - Legin Group, Washington, DC: economics, management. 2 * Mixed-waste landfill authorized by EPA and Washington State DoE for disposal of

351

EM ARRA Best Practices and Lessons Learned Workshop: Field Manager's Top Issues  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM ARRA BEST PRACTICES and LESSONS LEARNED WORKSHOP Waste Management Symposium Phoenix, AZ March 1, 2012 www.em.doe.gov 2 Field Manager's Top Issues Strategic Direction/Programmatic Decisions - Make remaining programmatic decisions so field can implement in expedited and efficient manner Streamline Requirements - Reduce reporting and new requirements from HQ to field Delegate to Field - Provide more tactical decision making to the field in the area of contracts, AE, and execution year budget decisions www.em.doe.gov 3 Field Manager's Top Issues Strategic Direction/Programmatic Decisions - Make remaining programmatic decisions so field can implement in expedited and efficient manner. Examples:

352

Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Drum Venting - Operational Experience and Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Remote-handled transuranic (RH TRU) waste drums must be vented to meet transportation and disposal requirement before shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The capability to perform remote venting of drums was developed and implemented at the Idaho National Laboratory. Over 490 drums containing RH TRU waste were successfully vented. Later efforts developed and implemented a long-stem filter to breach inner waste bags, which reduced layers of confinement and mitigated restrictive transportation wattage limits. This paper will provide insight to the technical specifications for the drum venting system, development, and testing activities, startup, operations, and lessons learned. (authors)

Clements, Th.L.Jr.; Bhatt, R.N.; Troescher, P.D. [CH2M-WG Idaho/Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Wickland, T.J.; Anderson, L.; Wood, R. [Nuclear Filter Technology, Golden, CO (United States); Lattin, W.J. [Department of Energy-Idaho Operations Office, Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

353

Compact Fluorescent Lighting in America: Lessons Learned on the Way to Market  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the history of compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) in America. CFLs were introduced in the 1970s; however, it has taken more than 20 years for them to gain widespread recognition in the U.S. residential lighting market. This report reviews the development of CFLs, efforts to increase market acceptance of them, and barriers to that acceptance. Lessons to be learned from this study of CFLs are identified in hopes of assisting future market introduction efforts for other promising energy-efficient technologies. This report was prepared by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energys Office of Building Technologies, Emerging Technologies Program.

Sandahl, Linda J.; Gilbride, Theresa L.; Ledbetter, Marc R.; Steward, Heidi E.; Calwell, Chris

2006-05-22T23:59:59.000Z

354

A collaborative learning lesson from using effective information technology combinations  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The purpose of this study is to measure the impact of the effectiveness of the use of IT system combinations on logistics firms performances. This study used market basket analysis to identify the information technology packages used by logistics firms. A total of 181 major international logistics service providers are used as the samples of this study. The research findings provide strong empirical evidence that leading logistics firms running the most frequently used combinations of IT systems clearly outperformed those forgoing these combinations and their use of information technology is rated much better than others. This study is the first to use market basket analysis to examine the impact of the IT combinations logistics companies are using on firm performance. It identifies the information technology packages most frequently used by major international logistics firms, and then analyzes the impact these combinations have on the organizational performances of the companies. Also, the effects of collaborative learning can be gained if effective information technology combinations can be implemented.

Yen-Chun Jim Wu; Tse-Ping Dong; Chan-Lan Chang; Ya-Chun Liao

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

GUIDANCE REGARDING NEPA REGULATIONS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

This memorandum was published in the Federal Register and appears at 48 Fed. Reg. 34263 (1983). Ed. Note] This memorandum was published in the Federal Register and appears at 48 Fed. Reg. 34263 (1983). Ed. Note] GUIDANCE REGARDING NEPA REGULATIONS 40 CFR Part 1500 Executive Office of the President Council on Environmental Quality 722 Jackson Place, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 July 22, 1983 Memorandum For: Heads of Federal Agencies From: A. Alan Hill, Chairman Re: Guidance Regarding NEPA Regulations The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) were issued on November 29, 1978. These regulations became effective for, and binding upon, most federal agencies on July 30, 1979, and for all remaining federal agencies on November 30, 1979. As part of the Council's NEPA oversight responsibilities it solicited through an August 14,

356

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

f8J 0 Hazardous A. ir Pollutants? Is the project subject to emissions limitations in an Air Quality 0 f8J 0 Control Region? 2 Revised on: 1111212008 NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Impacts...

357

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA Review Routing Form  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Review Routing Form NEPA Review Routing Form A ::opy of I \ I I ..... Forwarded Forwarded To Date i-t l.tlbrub ~ r:H:.. ~rrr

358

Multi-unit Operations in Non-Nuclear Systems: Lessons Learned for Small Modular Reactors  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The nuclear-power community has reached the stage of proposing advanced reactor designs to support power generation for decades to come. Small modular reactors (SMRs) are one approach to meet these energy needs. While the power output of individual reactor modules is relatively small, they can be grouped to produce reactor sites with different outputs. Also, they can be designed to generate hydrogen, or to process heat. Many characteristics of SMRs are quite different from those of current plants and may be operated quite differently. One difference is that multiple units may be operated by a single crew (or a single operator) from one control room. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is examining the human factors engineering (HFE) aspects of SMRs to support licensing reviews. While we reviewed information on SMR designs to obtain information, the designs are not completed and all of the design and operational information is not yet available. Nor is there information on multi-unit operations as envisioned for SMRs available in operating experience. Thus, to gain a better understanding of multi-unit operations we sought the lesson learned from non-nuclear systems that have experience in multi-unit operations, specifically refineries, unmanned aerial vehicles and tele-intensive care units. In this paper we report the lessons learned from these systems and the implications for SMRs.

OHara J. M.; Higgins, J.; DAgostino, A.

2012-01-17T23:59:59.000Z

359

Strategic Program Planning Lessons Learned in Developing the LTS S&T Roadmap  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Technology roadmapping is a strategic planning method used by companies to identify and plan the development of technologies necessary for new products. The U.S. Department of Energys Office of Environmental Management has used this same method to refine requirements and identify knowledge and tools needed for completion of defined missions. This paper describes the process of applying roadmapping to clarify mission requirements and identify enhancing technologies for the Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) of polluted sites after site cleanup has been completed. The nature of some contamination problems is such that full cleanup is not achievable with current technologies and some residual hazards remain. LTS maintains engineered contaminant barriers and land use restriction controls, and monitors residual contaminants until they no longer pose a risk to the public or the environment. Roadmapping was used to clarify the breadth of the LTS mission, to identify capability enhancements needed to improve mission effectiveness and efficiency, and to chart out the research and development efforts to provide those enhancements. This paper is a case study of the application of roadmapping for program planning and technical risk management. Differences between the planned and actual application of the roadmapping process are presented along with lessons learned. Both the process used and lessons learned should be of interest for anyone contemplating a similar technology based planning effort.

Duane Hanson; Brent Dixon; Gretchen Matthern

2003-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

Strategic Program Planning Lessons Learned In Developing The Long-Term Stewardship Science and Technology Roadmap  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Technology roadmapping is a strategic planning method used by companies to identify and plan the development of technologies necessary for new products. The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management has used this same method to refine requirements and identify knowledge and tools needed for completion of defined missions. This paper describes the process of applying roadmapping to clarify mission requirements and identify enhancing technologies for the Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) of polluted sites after site cleanup has been completed. The nature of some contamination problems is such that full cleanup is not achievable with current technologies and some residual hazards remain. LTS maintains engineered contaminant barriers and land use restriction controls, and monitors residual contaminants until they no longer pose a risk to the public or the environment. Roadmapping was used to clarify the breadth of the LTS mission, to identify capability enhancements needed to improve mission effectiveness and efficiency, and to chart out the research and development efforts to provide those enhancements. This paper is a case study of the application of roadmapping for program planning and technical risk management. Differences between the planned and actual application of the roadmapping process are presented along with lessons learned. Both the process used and lessons learned should be of interest for anyone contemplating a similar technology based planning effort.

Dixon, B.W.; Hanson, D.J.; Matthern, G.E.

2003-04-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Lessons Learned on Benchmarking from the International Human Reliability Analysis Empirical Study  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The International Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) Empirical Study is a comparative benchmark of the prediction of HRA methods to the performance of nuclear power plant crews in a control room simulator. There are a number of unique aspects to the present study that distinguish it from previous HRA benchmarks, most notably the emphasis on a method-to-data comparison instead of a method-to-method comparison. This paper reviews seven lessons learned about HRA benchmarking from conducting the study: (1) the dual purposes of the study afforded by joining another HRA study; (2) the importance of comparing not only quantitative but also qualitative aspects of HRA; (3) consideration of both negative and positive drivers on crew performance; (4) a relatively large sample size of crews; (5) the use of multiple methods and scenarios to provide a well-rounded view of HRA performance; (6) the importance of clearly defined human failure events; and (7) the use of a common comparison language to translate the results of different HRA methods. These seven lessons learned highlight how the present study can serve as a useful template for future benchmarking studies.

Ronald L. Boring; John A. Forester; Andreas Bye; Vinh N. Dang; Erasmia Lois

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

362

E-Print Network 3.0 - assessment lessons learned Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Mathematics ; Multidisciplinary Databases and Resources 13 Jeremy Strong, Weeping Water, NE 2008 Lesson Plan Summary: Jeremy Strong, Weeping Water, NE 2008 Lesson Plan...

363

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Each Federal agency is required to develop NEPA procedures that supplement the CEQ Regulations. Developed in...

364

Annual NEPA Planning Summary Report template 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Project 1162014 Estimated Schedule (NEPA Milestones) Page 1 WVDP-NEPA-APS-2014 NEPA Document Title, Location, Document Number Discussion of Mitigation Commitments and...

365

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities, May 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summaiy .....................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1

366

Independent Oversight Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities, May 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned from Targeted Reviews of Implementation Verification Review Processes at Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities May 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summaiy .....................................................................................................................................iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1

367

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

368

ederal NEPA Contacts  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STATE NEPA CONTACTS: STATE NEPA CONTACTS: State and Agency: NEPA Regulation: Name: Address: Phone/Email/Website: California Office of Planning and Research/ State Clearinghouse CAL. PUB. RES. CODE §§ 21000 - 21177 Mr. Scott Morgan Director of State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Room 212 Sacramento, CA 95814 916-445-0613 state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov http://opr.ca.gov/index.php?a=c eqa/index.html Connecticut Office of Policy and Management CONN. GEN. STATE. ANN. §§ 22a-1 to -1i Mr. Dimple Desai Director of CEPA 450 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106- 1308 860-418-6412 860-418-6200 (fax) Dimple.desai@ct.gov http://www.ct.gov/opm District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs D.C. STAT. §§ 8-109.01 to -109.11 Mr. Ibrahim Bullo

369

NEPA Compliance Officer  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Compliance Officer Compliance Officer Award #: EE 000 0784 Recipient: County of Escambia ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) MC Blanchard Judicial Center B5.1 Historic Preservation Clause and Old Courthouse Block Waste Stream Clause Office Complex EEIP Road Prison Geothermal Earth Coupled HVAC Upgrade A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering, data collection, reporting, and preliminary design. Prohibited Activities: Implementation of final design, construction, and operation tasks for this project should be conditioned pending further NEPA review. Landfill Gas Extraction and Control System A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering,

370

Tribal Energy NEPA Fundamentals Workshop  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

The Tribal Energy NEPA Fundamentals Workshop is a three-day workshop for tribes to understand how to manage the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process and implement the Council on...

371

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996) | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

NEPA process costs, NEPA contractor evaluation procedures, and details on the DOE NEPA Web site. The statement of work here is superseded by that of the DOE-wide Contracts. NEPA...

372

Lessons Learned from Cyber Security Assessments of SCADA and Energy Management Systems  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Enhancing control systems security in the energy sector NSTB September 2006 LESSONS LEARNED FROM CYBER SECURITY ASSESSMENTS OF SCADA AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Raymond K. Fink David F. Spencer Rita A. Wells NSTB INL/CON-06-11665 iii ABSTRACT Results from ten cyber security vulnerability assessments of process control, SCADA, and energy management systems, or components of those systems, were reviewed to identify common problem areas. The common vulnerabilities identified ranged from conventional IT security issues to specific weaknesses in control system protocols. In each vulnerability category, relative measures were assigned to the severity of the vulnerability and

373

September 10, 2003, Board Public Meeting - Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Davis-Besse Lessons Learned  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 101 inspector to a senior, and then they'll move to another facility, but seven years is the maximum, and that's written in our policy. CHAIRMAN CONWAY: Thank you. Dr. Hackett. DR. HACKETT: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have a different challenge today, which is to try and help walk you through a story that's very important to us in the nuclear industry. In general, it dovetails with what Russ and Cindy had been talking about. The thing I'll add on this slide is that during the timeframe from May to October 2002, I was Assistant Team Leader for the NRC's Davis-Besse Lessons Learned Task Force. That's the role in which I'll be presenting this information to you. As you've been doing, I think I found that these work most

374

Lessons Learned from Practical Field Experience with High Pressure Gaseous Fuels  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5/2010 5/2010 www.cleanvehicle.org 1 Lessons Learned from Practical Field Experience with High Pressure Gaseous Fuels DOE - DOT CNG - H 2 Workshop December 10, 2009 Douglas Horne, PE - CVEF President Rob Adams, P.Eng. - Marathon Technical Services The Facts  NGVs have been used in North America for over 30 years  Codes and Standards (C&S) provide opportunity for safe reliable operation of NGVs  C&S evolve with new technology and field experience  People make mistakes, continuous training is critical for safe operations  Cylinders have a limited life -track your cylinders! 2/25/2010 www.cleanvehicle.org 2 Incidents in North America  Since 1984 CVEF has recorded 97 incidents of which 67 involved CNG vehicles - 37 incidents involve either a CNG leak (15) or a

375

DOE-STD-7501-99; The DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7501-99 7501-99 December 1999 Superseding DOE-STD-7501-95 Including Change Notice No. 1 September 1997 DOE STANDARD THE DOE CORPORATE LESSONS LEARNED PROGRAM U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-7501-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy Technical Standard is approved for use by all DOE Components and

376

University Reactor Conversion Lessons Learned Workshop for the University of Florida  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energys (DOE) Idaho National Laboratory (INL), under its programmatic responsibility for managing the University Research Reactor Conversions, has completed the conversion of the reactor at the University of Florida. This project was successfully completed through an integrated and collaborative effort involving the INL, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), DOE (Headquarters and Field Office), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Universities, and contractors involved in analyses, fuel design and fabrication, and SNF shipping and disposition. With the work completed with these two universities, and in anticipation of other impending conversion projects, INL convened and engaged the project participants in a structured discussion to capture lessons learned. The objectives of this meeting were to capture the observations, insights, issues, concerns, and ideas of those involved in the reactor conversions so that future efforts can be conducted with greater effectiveness, efficiency, and with fewer challenges.

Eric C. Woolstenhulme; Dana M. Meyer

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

377

Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation: An Examination of Potential Lessons Learned From Prior Shipping Campaigns  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (NWPA), as amended, assigned the Department of Energy (DOE) responsibility for developing and managing a Federal system for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW). The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) is responsible for accepting, transporting, and disposing of SNF and HLW at the Yucca Mountain repository in a manner that protects public health, safety, and the environment; enhances national and energy security; and merits public confidence. OCRWM faces a near-term challengeto develop and demonstrate a transportation system that will sustain safe and efficient shipments of SNF and HLW to a repository. To better inform and improve its current planning, OCRWM has extensively reviewed plans and other documents related to past high-visibility shipping campaigns of SNF and other radioactive materials within the United States. This report summarizes the results of this review and, where appropriate, lessons learned.

Marsha Keister; Kathryn McBride

2006-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

378

20 Years on lessons learned from Piper Alpha. The evolution of concurrent and inherently safe design  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

It has now been well over 20 years since the North Sea Piper Alpha disaster in 1988. There have been many lessons learned; some documented others just etched in memory. The event chronicled many significant changes in the offshore industry. The emanating point for most sweeping changes has been the Cullen Report and the UK North Sea industry. This paper reviews some of the critical lessons and identifies many secondary finer points that constitute important learnings. The paper looks at major changes instigated by step changes in safety criticality. It is argued that the second tier modes of failure such as corrosion, materials degradation, environmental cracking, erosion, plant ergonomics, etc. need to be better examined. These mechanisms are dangerous threats to the integrity of deep subsea assets, and it is noted that such root causes of failure as witnessed or predicted have yet to be fully appraised. The authors use wide experiences and case histories to highlight such concerns, offering rational fit-for-purpose solutions. The industry disconnections between, urgency to build, knowledge transfer, and management of change, are refocused. Powerful advances in risk-based mechanical, process, materials, and corrosion engineering are emphasized and the use of key performance indicators (KPIs) are reasoned for best life-cycle integrity. To keep up with the pace of growth in the deepwater sector, methods of concurrent and inherently safe design have evolved in a world where the practicalities and costs of modification, repair and retrofit are extremely difficult. Hence getting it right at the outset is paramount. Thus the drive for purposeful investment, at design is more justifiable, than the traditional practice of postponing costs (and problems) to operations. In this way the ominous gray zone between the two cost centers is better bridged for reasons of safety and commercial advantage.

Binder Singh; Paul Jukes; Ben Poblete; Bob Wittkower

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

OpenEI Community - NEPA  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Geothermal NEPA Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC http://en.openei.org/community/blog/geothermal-nepa-workshop-grc On Tuesday, October 2, the Geothermal Technology Office and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory held a 1/2-day NEPA workshop.  The workshop was held at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, in conjunction with the GEA/GRC Tradeshow and Conference.  Three presentations were given, describing the NEPA database and associated analysis that had been conducted in 2013.

Files: 

380

NEPA History | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

History History NEPA History Selected documents providing historical information on NEPA. June 14, 2012 Federal Register Notices for DOE NEPA Guidelines and Regulations Historical compilation of Federal Register notices for DOE NEPA guidelines and regulations. December 31, 2009 Presidential Proclamation on the 40th Anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act Proclamation of President Obama to "call upon all executive branch agencies to promote public involvement and transparency in their implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act." July 1, 1999 EPA's Section 309 Review: The Clean Air Act and NEPA This document discusses Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, which authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency to review certain proposed actions of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Finishing and Special Motifs: Lessons Learned from CRISPR Analysis Using Next-Generation Draft Sequences ( 7th Annual SFAF Meeting, 2012)  

ScienceCinema (OSTI)

Catherine Campbell on "Finishing and Special Motifs: Lessons learned from CRISPR analysis using next-generation draft sequences" at the 2012 Sequencing, Finishing, Analysis in the Future Meeting held June 5-7, 2012 in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Campbell, Catherine [Noblis

2013-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

382

E-Print Network 3.0 - application lessons learned Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

45 Phone:415.405.4328 Fax:415.338.2172 Summary: Ave StudentServicesBuilding,105 SF State Gator Swim Lessons Summer 2011 SFStateGatorSwimLessons San Francisco... --Thursday 30...

383

NEPA | OpenEI Community  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

NEPA NEPA Home Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(155) Contributor 14 October, 2013 - 20:19 Geothermal NEPA Workshop at GRC Categorical Exclusions CX Database EA EIS FONSI GEA GRC GRR NEPA On Tuesday, October 2, the Geothermal Technology Office and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory held a 1/2-day NEPA workshop. The workshop was held at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, in conjunction with the GEA/GRC Tradeshow and Conference. Three presentations were given, describing the NEPA database and associated analysis that had been conducted in 2013. Files: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation icon 2. NEPA History - Presentation application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation icon 3. Categorical Exclusions - Presentation

384

618-10 Burial Ground Trench Remediation and 618-10 and 618-11 Burial Ground Nonintrusive Characterization of Vertical Pipe Units Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A lessons learned is a noteworthy practice or innovative approach that is captured and shared to promote repeat application, or an adverse work practice/experience that is captured and shared to avoid reoccurrence. This document provides the lessons learned identified by the 618-10 Burial Ground trench remediation and the 618-10 and 618-11 Burial Ground nonintrusive characterization of the vertical pipe units (VPUs).

Darby, J. W.

2012-06-28T23:59:59.000Z

385

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Change out down guy on power pole Date: 2-8-10 DOE Code : Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview 1 What are the environmental No impact to the environment impacts? Power pole east of B-1 -33 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 3Hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (worl< over rig, drilling rig, Backhoe and operator for equ1 pment etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE; If ChiingNEPA Compllai"'Ce Survey alld contact Ut TlrCh.,lcal Assunlnce DepartmenL Impacts If YES, then complete below

386

UGP Environmental Review (NEPA)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Environmental Review-NEPA Environmental Review-NEPA Categorical exclusions are posted here to promote transparency and openness. Some actions may have environmental impacts that require an environmental assessment and a detailed analysis to determine the extent and severity of the impacts. For actions that have significant impacts or consequences to the environment or human health, UGP prepares environmental impact statements. Environmental Impact Statement-EIS Groton Generation Projects Draft EIS, Deer Creek Station Energy Facility Project, Brookings County, South Dakota (12.7mb pdf) Deer Creek Station Energy Facility Project Record of Decision (900kb pdf) Grande Praire Wind Farm, O'Neill, NE Wilton IV Wind Energy Center EIS (DOE/EIS-0469) Upper Great Plains Wind Energy Programmatic EIS (DOE/EIS-0408)

387

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: New Drilling Location in Section 29 Date: 12-10-2009 DOE Code: 6730.020.78002 Contractor Code: 8067-371 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview The project will involve excavating 3-4 backhoe pits to a depth of about 8 feet to observe soil characteristics 1. What are the environmental impacts? in the vicinity of our planned reserve pit excavation area. 2. What is the legal location? NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 29. T39N. R78W. Natrona County, Wyoming 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

388

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Project l nfonnation Project Title: Reclamation ofT-2-14 Date: 11/2412009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be removing old piping from the treater@ T-2-14. We will also remove the berm and grade and 1. What are the environmental impacts? reclamate location. The duration of this project will be approx. 2 days. Equipment that will be used is as follows backhoe. dumptruck, blade,and a tiller so we can seed with native grasses. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (woO< over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below Is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

389

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace electrical line from well to power pole Date: 3/10/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview No impact to the environment. 1. What are the environmental impacts? Dig up old electrical line from pumping unit on 61-S-34 to power pole east of well , {approximately 75 feet 2. What is the legal location? from unit) and replace with new line. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig , drilling rig , etc.)? Electrician, ditch witch and operator for equipment The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

390

RM Environmental Review (NEPA)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Environmental Review-NEPA Environmental Review-NEPA Categorical exclusions are posted here to promote transparency and openness. Some actions may have environmental impacts that require an environmental assessment and a detailed analysis to determine the extent and severity of the impacts. For actions that have significant impacts or consequences to the environment or human health, RM prepares environmental impact statements. Environmental Impact Statements-EIS Estes-Flatiron Transmission Line Rebuild Project Granby Pumping Plant-Windy Gap Transmission Line Rebuild Project Hermosa West Wind Energy Project Maintenance and Vegetation Management along Existing Western TransmissionLine Rights of Way on National Forest System Lands in Colorado, Utah, Nebraska Platte River Cooperative Agreement PEIS, NE, CO and WY, DOE/EIS-0295 (Cooperating Agency)

391

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

81 81 Project lnfonnation Project Title: CBM Gas Separator Date: 2-23-2010 DOE Code: 6720-020-51131 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview None anticipated, uses producing well on pre-existing location. 1. What are the environmental impacts? 48-2-X-28 Location, 447' FSL. 2495 FWL, SE, SW, Sec. 28, T39N, R78W, Natrona County. Wyoming USA 2. Wnat is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Forkfift. winch truck. water truck etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Special ist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NO'TE: H Change of Scope occurs, Proj ect Lead m u st $ubmlt a new NEPA Compllance Suntey and

392

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EAG. Maintenance I grading of existing roads Date: 8/4/2011 and road drainages (barrow ditches): ex 81.3 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview 1. Brief project description [include C-EA 6. Maintenance I grading of existing roads and road drai nages anything that could impact the (barrow ditches) : ex 81.3 environment] Existing roads defined as per May 2010 Aerial Photos. (Changing out culverts, grading I modifying embankments, etc., that has potential to impact wetlands, requires a NCS.) The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

393

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration of 77 -13-SX-3 Date: 2-8-1 0 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring 77-SX-3 per procedure. 1. What are the environmental impacts? The duration of this project will be 3-4 days. 2. What is the leg al location? 3. What is the duration of the project? The equipment to be used will be Backhoe, welder, tiller dump truck. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig , We will take oil contaminated dirt to the Eastside landfarm and backfill with d ean fill dirt from sec. 20. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

394

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Project lnfonnation Project Title: e-EA5. Reclamation of well sites Date: 8/4/2011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview e-EA 5. Reclamation of wellsites : ex 81.3 and ex 86.1 1. Brief project description [include anything that could impact the Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation and environment] consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of underground piping, removal of rig anchors or T-bars, drainage control , transport and backfilling of clean soil I fill dirt, and reseeding . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

395

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

~ ~ -o ~ ~ -o Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace Down Guy Rod 24~3 Date: 11/30/09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview Replace Down Guy Rod Emergency The pole was ready to Break Wire 5' above the ground 1. What are the environmental impacts? 24-SHX-3 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5 hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc,)? Back hole The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTe If Change of Scope oe~. Project Lead must sutlmft a new NEPA ColT pll~ Sunley and c ontact the T echnical Assurance Department. Impacts If YES, then complete below

396

Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners Council on Environmental Quality Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners Collaboration in NEPA - a Handbook for NEPA Practitioners is a collaboration of research and consultations by CEQ concerning analyses prepared under NEPA. Updated in the Fall of 2007, this 100-page guide introduces interested parties to collaborative principles, and includes suggestions for successful collaborative efforts. CEQ Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners More Documents & Publications OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution

397

DOE-HDBK-7502-95; Implementing U.S. Department of Energy Lessons Learned Programs - Volume 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-HDBK-7502-95 August 1995 DOE HANDBOOK IMPLEMENTING U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LESSONS LEARNED PROGRAMS Volume I U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Lessons Learned Handbook: DOE-HDBK-7502-95 Page i Table of Contents Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

398

Building Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned (Brochure), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Efficient Schools in New Orleans Lessons Learned 2 3 The devastation of schools in New Orleans from the hurricanes was exacerbated by many years of deferred school maintenance. n Introduction Hurricane Katrina was the largest natural disaster in the United States, striking the Gulf Coast on August 29, 2005, and flooding 80% of New Orleans; to make matters worse, the city was flooded again only three weeks later by the effects of Hurricane Rita. Many of the buildings, including schools, were heavily damaged. The devastation of schools in New Orleans from the hurricanes was exacerbated by many years of deferred school maintenance. This case study presents the lessons learned from incorporating energy efficiency in the rebuilding and renovating of New Orleans K-12 schools after Hurricanes

399

Lessons Learned from the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Technology/PV Manufacturing R&D and Thin Film PV Partnership Projects  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Solar Energy Technologies Program initiates new cost-shared solar energy R&D under the Solar America Initiative (SAI), it is useful to analyze the experience gained from cost-shared R&D projects that have been funded through the program to date. This report summarizes lessons learned from two DOE-sponsored photovoltaic (PV) projects: the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Technology/PV Manufacturing R&D (PVMaT/PVMR&D) project and the Thin-Film PV Partnership project. During the past 10-15 years, these two projects have invested roughly $330 million of government resources in cost-shared R&D and leveraged another $190 million in private-sector PV R&D investments. Following a description of key findings and brief descriptions of the PVMaT/PVMR&D and Thin-Film PV Partnership projects, this report presents lessons learned from the projects.

Margolis, R.; Mitchell, R.; Zweibel, K.

2006-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

Building Energy-Efficient Schools in New Orleans: Lessons Learned (Brochure), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy- Energy- Efficient Schools in New Orleans Lessons Learned 2 3 The devastation of schools in New Orleans from the hurricanes was exacerbated by many years of deferred school maintenance. n Introduction Hurricane Katrina was the largest natural disaster in the United States, striking the Gulf Coast on August 29, 2005, and flooding 80% of New Orleans; to make matters worse, the city was flooded again only three weeks later by the effects of Hurricane Rita. Many of the buildings, including schools, were heavily damaged. The devastation of schools in New Orleans from the hurricanes was exacerbated by many years of deferred school maintenance. This case study presents the lessons learned from incorporating energy efficiency in the rebuilding and renovating of New Orleans K-12 schools after Hurricanes

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 More Documents & Publications 2010...

402

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Environmental Management System National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Regulations and Links DOE NEPA Website NEPA Compliance Program...

403

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Contracting Reform Guidance Contracting Reform Guidance NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance This documents provides guidance on NEPA contracting strategy, including: defining the work of the contractor; establishing contracts ahead of time; minimizing cost while maintaining quality. Guidance also provides: model statements of work, direction on NEPA contract management by NEPA Document Manager; a system for measuring NEPA costs and for evaluating contractor procedures; details on the DOE NEPA website. NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance More Documents & Publications NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996) Statement of Work-National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Support Services Acquisition: Preparation and Review of Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Assessments, Environmental Reports, and other Environmental

404

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Steps to SWEIS Development Notice of Intent to Prepare SWEIS Public Scoping Period Opportunities for...

405

Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance at Rocky Flats: Early Experiences and Lessons Learned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Rocky Flats Site was established in 1951 as part of the United States' nationwide nuclear weapons complex to manufacture nuclear weapons components. In 1992 weapons production halted, and the Rocky Flats mission changed to include environmental investigations, cleanup, and site closure. In October 2005, DOE and its contractor completed an accelerated 10-year, $7 billion cleanup of chemical and radiological contamination left from nearly 50 years of production. The cleanup required the decommissioning, decontamination, demolition, and removal of more than 800 structures; removal of more than 500,000 cubic meters of low-level radioactive waste; and remediation of more than 360 potentially contaminated environmental sites. The final remedy for the site was selected in September 2006 and included institutional controls, physical controls, and continued monitoring for the former industrial portion of the site. The remainder of the site, which served as a buffer zone surrounding the former industrial area, was transferred to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in July 2007 for a national wildlife refuge. DOE's Office of Legacy Management is responsible for the long-term surveillance and maintenance of Rocky Flats, which includes remedy implementation activities and general site maintenance. Several factors have complicated the transition from closure to post-closure at Rocky Flats. The early experiences associated with the two years since the physical cleanup and closure work were completed have led to several valuable lessons learned. (authors)

Surovchak, S. [U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management, Westminster, CO (United States); Kaiser, L.; DiSalvo, R.; Boylan, J.; Squibb, G.; Nelson, J.; Darr, B.; Hanson, M. [S.M. Stoller Corporation, Westminster, CO (United States)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

TANK 241-AN-102 MULTI-PROBE CORROSION MONITORING SYSTEM PROJECT LESSONS LEARNED  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During 2007 and 2008, a new Multi-Probe Corrosion Monitoring System (MPCMS) was designed and fabricated for use in double-shell tank 241-AN-102. The system was successfully installed in the tank on May 1, 2008. The 241-AN-102 MPCMS consists of one 'fixed' in-tank probe containing primary and secondary reference electrodes, tank material electrodes, Electrical Resistance (ER) sensors, and stressed and unstressed corrosion coupons. In addition to the fixed probe, the 241-AN-102 MPCMS also contains four standalone coupon racks, or 'removable' probes. Each rack contains stressed and unstressed coupons made of American Society of Testing and Materials A537 CL1 steel, heat-treated to closely match the chemical and mechanical characteristics of the 241-AN-102 tank wall. These coupon racks can be removed periodically to facilitate examination of the attached coupons for corrosion damage. Along the way to successful system deployment and operation, the system design, fabrication, and testing activities presented a number of challenges. This document discusses these challenges and lessons learned, which when applied to future efforts, should improve overall project efficiency.

TAYLOR T; HAGENSEN A; KIRCH NW

2008-07-07T23:59:59.000Z

407

Lessons Learned: The Grand Junction Office Site Transfer to Private Ownership  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office (DOE?GJO) in Grand Junction, Colorado, has played an integral role within the DOE complex for many years. GJO has a reputation for outstanding quality in the performance of complex environmental restoration projects, utilizing state-of-the-art technology. Many of the GJO missions have been completed in recent years. In 1998, DOE Headquarters directed GJO to reduce its mortgage costs by transferring ownership of the site and to lease space at a reasonable rate for its ongoing work. A local community group and GJO have entered into a sales contract; signing of the Quitclaim Deed is planned for February 16, 2001. Site transfer tasks were organized as a project with a critical-path schedule to track activities and a Site Transition Decision Plan was prepared that included a decision process flow chart, key tasks, and responsibilities. Specifically, GJO identified the end state with affected parties early on, successfully dealt with site contamination issues, and negotiated a lease-back arrangement, resulting in an estimated savings of more than 60 percent of facility maintenance costs annually. Lessons learned regarding these transition activities could be beneficial to many other sites.

none,

2001-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

Lessons learned from applying VIM to fast reactor critical experiments, summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

VIM is a continuous energy Monte Carlo code first developed around 1970 for the analysis of plate-type, fast-neutron, zero-power critical assemblies. In most respects, VIM is functionally equivalent to the MCNP code but it has two features that make uniquely suited to the analysis of fast reactor critical experiments: (1) the place lattice geometry option, which allows efficient description of and neutron tracking in the assembly geometry, and (2) a statistical treatment of neutron cross section data in the unresolved resonance range. Since its inception, VIM`s capabilities have expanded to include numerous features, such as thermal neutron cross sections, photon cross sections, and combinatorial and other geometry options, that have allowed its use in a wide range of neutral-particle transport problems. The earliest validation work at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) focused on the validation of VIM itself. This work showed that, in order for VIM to be a ``rigomus`` tool, extreme detail in the pointwise Monte Carlo libraries was needed, and the required detail was added. The emphasis soon shifted to validating models, methods, data and codes against VIM. Most of this work was done in the context of analyzing critical experiments in zero power reactor (ZPR) assemblies. The purpose of this paper is to present some of the lessons learned from using VIM in ZPR analysis work.

Schaefer, R.W.; McKnight, R.D.; Collins, P.J.

1995-05-17T23:59:59.000Z

409

Applying lessons learned to enhance human performance and reduce human error for ISS operations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A major component of reliability, safety, and mission success for space missions is ensuring that the humans involved (flight crew, ground crew, mission control, etc.) perform their tasks and functions as required. This includes compliance with training and procedures during normal conditions, and successful compensation when malfunctions or unexpected conditions occur. A very significant issue that affects human performance in space flight is human error. Human errors can invalidate carefully designed equipment and procedures. If certain errors combine with equipment failures or design flaws, mission failure or loss of life can occur. The control of human error during operation of the International Space Station (ISS) will be critical to the overall success of the program. As experience from Mir operations has shown, human performance plays a vital role in the success or failure of long duration space missions. The Department of Energy`s Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) is developed a systematic approach to enhance human performance and reduce human errors for ISS operations. This approach is based on the systematic identification and evaluation of lessons learned from past space missions such as Mir to enhance the design and operation of ISS. This paper describes previous INEEL research on human error sponsored by NASA and how it can be applied to enhance human reliability for ISS.

Nelson, W.R.

1998-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

410

Lessons Learned from Three Mile Island Packaging, Transportation and Disposition that Apply to Fukushima Daiichi Recovery  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Following the massive earthquake and resulting tsunami damage in March of 2011 at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan, interest was amplified for what was done for recovery at the Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) in the United States following its meltdown in 1979. Many parallels could be drawn between to two accidents. This paper presents the results of research done into the TMI-2 recovery effort and its applicability to the Fukushima Daiichi cleanup. This research focused on three topics: packaging, transportation, and disposition. This research work was performed as a collaboration between Japans Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI) and the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). Hundreds of TMI-2 related documents were searched and pertinent information was gleaned from these documents. Other important information was also obtained by interviewing employees who were involved first hand in various aspects of the TMI-2 cleanup effort. This paper is organized into three main sections: (1) Transport from Three Mile Island to Central Facilities Area at INL, (2) Transport from INL Central Receiving Facility to INL Test Area North (TAN) and wet storage at TAN, and (3) Transport from TAN to INL Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) and Dry Storage at INTEC. Within each of these sections, lessons learned from performing recovery activities are presented and their applicability to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant cleanup are outlined.

Layne Pincock; Wendell Hintze; Dr. Koji Shirai

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Experience and Lessons Learned from Conditioning of Spent Sealed Sources in Singapore - 13107  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 2010, IAEA requested KAERI (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) to support Singapore for conditioning spent sealed sources. Those that had been used for a lightning conductor, check source, or smoke detector, various sealed sources had been collected and stored by the NEA (National Environment Agency) in Singapore. Based on experiences for the conditioning of Ra-226 sources in some Asian countries since 2000, KAERI sent an expert team to Singapore for the safe management of spent sealed sources in 2011. As a result of the conditioning, about 575.21 mCi of Am-241, Ra-226, Co-60, and Sr-90 were safely conditioned in 3 concrete lining drums with the cooperation of the KAERI expert team, the IAEA supervisor, the NEA staff and local laborers in Singapore. Some lessons were learned during the operation: (1) preparations by a local authority are very helpful for an efficient operation, (2) a preliminary inspection by an expert team is helpful for the operation, (3) brief reports before and after daily operation are useful for communication, and (4) a training opportunity is required for the sustainability of the expert team. (authors)

Hong, Dae-Seok; Kang, Il-Sik; Jang, Kyung-Duk; Jang, Won-Hyuk [Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 1045 Daedeokdaero, Yuseong, Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)] [Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 1045 Daedeokdaero, Yuseong, Daejeon (Korea, Republic of); Hoo, Wee-Teck [National Environment Agency, 40 Scotts Road 228231 (Singapore)] [National Environment Agency, 40 Scotts Road 228231 (Singapore)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

What Is Needed to Make REDD+ Work on the Ground: Lessons Learned...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

implementation in the field that result in the provision of climate, community and biodiversity benefits." References "What Is Needed to Make REDD+ Work on the Ground: Lessons...

413

E-Print Network 3.0 - assay lessons learned Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

are assigned for your health lessons, you can decide - ONE must be designed for EITHER middle or high school Source: Dyer, Bill - Department of Plant Sciences and Plant...

414

E-Print Network 3.0 - arthroplasty lessons learned Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

are assigned for your health lessons, you can decide - ONE must be designed for EITHER middle or high school Source: Dyer, Bill - Department of Plant Sciences and Plant...

415

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Survey Centralizer Design Date: 2-10-2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.71091 Contractor Code: 8067-762 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview 1. What are the environmental No environmental impacts. impacts? Run a logging tool through existing wells at : 2. What is the /ega/location? 67-LBT-3, SW SE sec 3, T38N , R78W 86-1 -X-10 , NE SE Sec 10, T38N , R78W 3. What is the duration of the project? 22-2-X-10H , NW NW Sec 10, T38N , R78W 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig, 4 Days etc.)? Stinger truck or crane . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

416

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY # 350 8 Revised 8/2/10 mjt Attachment 1 Written by Dan Smallwood Production Enhancement Project-5 T-2-34 to T-1-33 MIT all wells in this area to determine which are producing wells. There are 15 wells shut in this area because of no tank or shipping line. According to the old test sheet these wells make 24bbls oil and 120bbls of water. Two of these wells have leaks in the flow lines that will be fixed. One is 33-S-34 which could be run to 34-AX-34, about 400' .6 bbl/pd and the other is 35 shx 34 which could be run to 35-AX-34 which is about 200'.5bbl/pd. 42-AX-34 could be ran to 32-AX-34 and then to 33-SX-34 to 34-AX-34. There are two manifolds at T-2-34, one with 10 wells and the other with 12. None of the flow lines have valves or checks in the lines. I propose we flush, disconnect, and plug all wells that

417

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

All Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) projects are reviewed under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 42 U.S.C. Section 4321 et seq. The Department of Energy regulations that implement NEPA require OE to determine whether a proposal requires preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), an Environmental Assessment (EA), or a Categorical Exclusion (CX).

418

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

defining early what contractors should accomplish defining early what contractors should accomplish < establishing contracts ahead of time < minimizing cost while maintaining quality by * maximizing competition and use of incentives * using past performance information in awarding work * managing the NEPA process as a project This guidance provides: < model statements of work < information on contract types and incentives < direction on effective NEPA contract management by the NEPA Document Manager < a system for measuring NEPA process costs < NEPA contractor evaluation procedures < details on the DOE NEPA Web site U.S. Department of Energy, Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance, December 1996 NEPA CONTRACTING REFORM GUIDANCE Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

419

Microsoft Word - NEPA Fact Sheet 082814.doc  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

NEPA process does not dictate that an agency select the most environmentally beneficial alternative. The purpose of the NEPA process is to ensure that accurate environmental...

420

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-$ )_Jp ~ R -$ )_Jp ~ R tW" I Project lnfonnation Project Title: New Drilling Location in Section 29 Date: 12-10-2009 DOE Code: 6730.020.78002 Contractor Code: 8067-371 Project Lead: Mar1< Duletsky Project Overview The project will involve excavating ~ backhoe pits to a depth of about 8 feet to observe soil characteristics 1. What are the environmental impacts? in the vicinity of our planned reserve pit excavation area. 2. What is the legal location? NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 29, T39N, R78W, Natrona County, Wyoming 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (worn over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the E. nvironmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

SN Environmental Review (NEPA)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Rates Rates You are here: SN Home page > Environment Environmental Review-NEPA Major Initiatives are the large projects that SNR is currently involved in. As new projects are added, and existing ones completed, you will find current information and updates in this area. Environmental Impact Statement-EIS Sacramento Area Voltage Support Trinity PUD Interconnection Projects Alternative Intake Project Transmission Line and Interconnection Delta-Mendota Canal / California Aqueduct Intertie (PDF - 17MB) Sutter Power Project San Luis Transmission Project Environmental Assessment-EA San Joaquin Valley Right-of-Way Maintenance Project North Area Right-of-Way Maintenance Project Sacramento Valley Right-of-Way Maintenance Project Categorical Exclusions-CX Cottonwood - Roseville OPGW Project CX (PDF - 6787KB)

422

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

lnfonnat lnfonnat lon Project Title: Geothennal Technologies Program I Date : II0/20/09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61 041 I Contractor Code: lso67-73t Project Lead: Lyle Johnson TillS NEPA is for the laying of a 2.975 foot. 8" welded plastic wata ltnc from Lillie Teall<'!(~ Project Overview 1. 'Mlat are the environmental ncar in the Intersection with Teapot Creek to the North Waterllood Facility (NW F) building. The impacts? entire project area is within Section 21 T39N R 78W (map attached) and will not impact any wet 2. 'Mlat is the legal location? land areas but will cross one in tcnnittcnt stream. The stream is presently dry. The project will 3. 'Mlat is the duration of the project? include the clearing of vegetation from a 12 foot wide construction corridor along the route, digging

423

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

D D Project lnfonnation Project Title: Emergency flowline repair 78-sx-34 & 68-66-sx-34 Date: 12-29-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: RickM. Project Overview We dug up the line where the oil was coming out of the ground and had to put 2 clamps on to seal the leak. 1. What are the environmental impacts? The contaminated dirt was hauled to the land farm and after the line was tested we backfilled the hole. this job took 5 hrs. to complete and required a backhoe and two hands. this leak was 100 yards south of well No. 2. What is the legal location? 68-66-sx-34. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

424

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration 72-12-SX-1 0 Date: 2/26/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring 71-12-SX1 0. This will include digging 5ft down and cutting well head off and placing 1. What are the environmental impacts? OHM. We will haul contaminated soils to the Eastside landfarm and record in log book. We will replace all dirt hauled off with clean fill from sec.20. 2. What is the legal location? 71-12 SX10 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately 3-4 days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig , Backhoe with operator, welder, tiller and one worker. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

425

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Geothennal Technologies Program Date: 12-11-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview This NEPA is for the laying of a 350 foot. 8" welded plastic water line from the lower cooling pond at the 1. What are the environmental Tensleep battery to a location between the 5,000 bbl tank and the top pond at the Tensleep battery. The impacts? entire project area is within Section 10 T39N R78VV (map attached) and will not impact any wet land areas. 2. What is the legal location? The project will include the clearing of sparse vegetation from a 12 foot wide construction corridor along the 3. What is the duration of the project? route, digging a 5 foot deep trench. welding and placing the plastic line and covering and compacting the

426

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 'f>lf,M/9-~ ~of- Project lnfq,gnation Project Title: WhisperGenARelocation from 58-MX-10 ~o 65-S-10 ·~ I Date: 3/16/2010 DOE Code: -#Z'l?. Contractor Code: Project Lead: Everett Walker /41f-t#J ST _,J.tl Project Overview The Environmental Specialist and the Field Coordinator visited location and discussed the plan to remove 1. What are the environmental impacts? the WhisperGen unit, concrete pad, gas supply umbilical, and power conduit from the current location and move to higher visibility area with dry gas supply to supply power to 65-S-1 0. an existing well. There were 2 previous NEPAs # 211 on 5/27/09 and #240 on 10/01/09 2. What is the legal location? 58-MX-10 3. What is the duration of the project? Construction Two days/ Project Duration 6 months

427

ederal NEPA Contacts  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mr. Horst Greczmiel Mr. Horst Greczmiel Associate Director for NEPA Oversight 202-395-0827 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Division: Name: Address: Phone/Email: Agriculture Research Service Mr. Charles L. Walthall National Program Leader, Office of National Programs, Natural Resources and Sustainable Agricultural Systems 5601 Sunnyside Ave. Beltsville, MD 20705-5140 301-504-4634 301-504-6231 (fax) charlie.walthall@ars.usda.gov Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Elizabeth (Wendy) Nelson Environmental Protection Specialist 4700 River Road Unit 149 Riverdale, MD 20737 301-851-3089 elizabeth.e.nelson@aphis.usda.gov National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Ms. Mary Ann Rozum Natural Resources and Environmental Unit 1400 Independence Ave, SW

428

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Project Information Project Title: Repair flowline at 83-AX-4 Date: 2-17-2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Bernard Winfrey Project Overview 1. What are the environmental Repair a flowline leak and test the line at 83-AX-4. Dug up pipeline, will backfill with clean fi ll dirt. Oil impacts? contaminated soil will be hauled to the east side landfarm and clean dirt will be brought in from section 20. 2. What is the legal location? 83-AX-4, N43 17'40.5" w. 10612'46.0" 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately 2 days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Backhoe with operator and one to three workers. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

429

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title : NODA 1. Planned repair of flow lines Dat e : 8/41201 DOE Code : Contrac t o r Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Ov erview NODA 1. Planned repair of flow lines : CX 8 5.4 1. Bnef project description [include anything that could impact the Note : For all 85.4 : Repair of pipeline sections falls under USACE environmenl] Nationwide Permit Number 12, Utility Line Activity. Non-emergency repairs that do NOT include reportable releases I spills. NOD required to ensure activities remain within existing right-of-ways (25' from centerline] and to determine if further analysis may be needed. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lea d a nd review ed by the Environmental Specialist a nd the DOE NEPA

430

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 3 Project Information Project Title: T-6-10 abandoment and storage relocation Date: 912812009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be reclaiming this loc. we will dig down approx. 4ft. cut off pipes and cap them. And haul of dirt from the berms . We will then blade loc. . The worX to be done is to reclaim this location. In preparation for this 1. What are the environmental worX we will need to remove the old shipping building and a old set of tank stairs. These will be placed in storage in section 14. Upon reading SOP: EN.8000.01 reviewed on July 23rd 2009 I believe this falls under impacts? 2. What is the legal location? NEPA exclusion ex 81 .3 and CX 85.3. Which reads: When moving portable buildings to another disturbed

431

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

:;J/7 :;J/7 Project Information Project Title: B-1-3 Heat Trace Date: 10/14/09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview Routine maintenance activities for the buildings at B-1-3 using existing electrical rights-of-way, to repair and replace electrical lines from the electrical box to the existing buildings. This is a routine 1. What are the environmental Maintenance activities, to preserve the electrical function in the buildings at B-1-3. impacts? 2. What is the legal location? 1 Day 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used Ditch witch I Backhoe if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

432

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned Date: 8/4/2011 batteries, test satellites, and facilities DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned batteries, test satellites, and 1. Brief project description [include facilities : anything that could impact the environment] ex 81 .3 and ex 86.1 Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation or consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of equipment and underground piping , drainage control, and reseeding. NOD req uired to ensure compliance with Reclamation Procedures. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

433

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Restoration "F T-3-3 Date: 1212/2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 1. What are the environmental The environmental impacts will be minimal since this is already disturbed land. The legal is T-3-3. We will be impacts? digging down 5ft. and cutting off pipe and capping them. We will then blade the area and till it The 2. What is the legal location? equipment to used is as follows: backhoe, blade, cutting torch,and a tiller. The duration of this project will be approx. 2 days. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Speciali.st and the DOE NEPA

434

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Project lnfonnat ion Project Title: Geothermal Technologies Program - ORMAT Generator Date: 10-22-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: 8067-731 Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview 1. What are the environmental This NEPA is for the existing ORMAT geothermal processing unit that was used for testing during CRADA impacts? No 2007-083. The Original project consisted of the installation and 1 year testing of the binary geothermal power unit at the Tensleep battery using the hot produced water source as the heat medium. The unit is 2. What is the legal location? connected to the field electrical system for dissipation of the produced energy that is metered and monitored 3. What is the duration of the project? for reliability and quality. It is planned for the unit to remain in place so that an additional approximately 2.5

435

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EA 7. Cleanup of "non-reportable" spills of crude Date: 8/4/2011 oil &/or produced water DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview C-EA 7. Cleanup of "non-reportable" spills of crude oil &/or produced 1. Brief project description [include water : ex 85.4 and ex 85.6 anything that could impact the environment] Note : For all 85.4 : Repair of pipeline sections falls under USACE Nationwide Perm it Number 12, Utility Line Activity. For RMOTC's NEPA purposes, non-reportable spills of crude oil &/or produced water are less than one barrel that is NOT environmentally significant. Events that are environmentally significant include those that

436

The Decovalex III Project: A Summary of Activities and LessonsLearned  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Initiated in 1992, the DECOVALEX project is an international collaboration for advancing the understanding and modeling of coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) processes in geologic systems. The project has made important scientific achievements through three stages and is progressing in its fourth stage. It has played a key role in the development of mathematical modeling and in situ testing of coupled THM processes in fractured rock and buffer/backfill materials, a subject of importance for performance assessment of radioactive waste geologic repositories. This paper summarizes studies under the most recent stage of the project, DECOVALEX III (2000-2003). These studies include those of two major field experiments: (a) the FEBEX experiment at Grimsel, Switzerland, investigating coupled THM processes in a crystalline rock-bentonite system, and (b) the Drift Scale Test (DST) experiment at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, investigating coupled THM processes in unsaturated tuff. These are two of the largest multiyear heater tests undertaken to date for the study of coupled THM processes in geological systems. In addition, three so-called benchmark tests are also studied to evaluate the impact of coupled THM processes under different scenarios and geometries. Within the DECOVALEX project, multiple research teams participated in each of the studies, using different approaches and computer codes. Comparisons of results have provided insight into coupled THM processes, which in turn has stimulated further development of our modeling capabilities. Lessons learned from these studies are discussed. The scientific advances and enhanced insight gained through this kind of international cooperation illustrate the effectiveness of the DECOVALEX project.

Tsang, Chin-Fu; Jing, Lanru; Stephansson, Ove; Kautsky, Fritz

2005-03-21T23:59:59.000Z

437

ISO 50001 for Commercial Buildings: Lessons Learned From U.S. DOE Pilot Project: Preprint  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the U.S., the ISO 50001 Standard, which establishes energy management systems (EnMSs) and processes, has shown uptake primarily in the industrial sector. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) undertook a pilot program to explore ISO 50001 implementation in commercial buildings. Eight organizations participated as pilots, with technical assistance provided by DOE, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), and the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech). This paper shares important lessons learned from the pilot. Staff time was the most critical resource required to establish effective EnMSs in commercial buildings. The pilot also revealed that technical support and template/example materials were essential inputs. Crucial activities included evaluating performance, identifying goals, making connections, communicating operational controls, and tracking/reviewing progress. Benefits realized included enhanced intra-organizational connections, greater energy awareness, increased process efficiencies, and improved ability to make business cases. Incremental benefits for ISO 50001 certification were greater accountability, assurance of best practices, public relations opportunities, and potential to unlock verified savings credits or incentive money. Incremental certification costs included more staff/consultant time, money for certification, and a tendency to limit EnMS scope in order to ensure favorable audit results. Five best practices were identified - utilizing expert technical assistance, training, and other resources; focusing on implementation over documentation; keeping top management involved; considering organizational structure when selecting EnMS scope; and matching the implementation level to an EnMS's scope and scale. The last two practices are particularly relevant to the commercial buildings sector.

Deru, M.; Field, K.; Punjabi, S.

2014-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

Workshop Notes from "Compressed Natural Gas and Hydrogen Fuels: Lessons Learned for the Safe Deployment of Vehicles" Workshop, December 10-11, 2009  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

S. Department of Energy and S. Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Transportation Workshop Compressed Natural Gas and Hydrogen Fuels: Lessons Learned for the Safe Deployment of Vehicles Workshop Notes December 10-11, 2009 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) hosted a workshop to exchange information among experts from China, India, and the U.S. on compressed natural gas (CNG) and hydrogen (H 2 ) fuels for vehicles and to share lessons learned from deployment of these vehicles in public transit, fleets, and consumer transportation throughout the world. The workshop had five major objectives, and the success of the workshop in addressing these objectives is summarized below. 1. Coordinate lessons learned by identifying similarities and critical

439

Lessons Learned/Best Practices during the Department of Energy's Implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, OAS-RA-12-03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lessons Learned/Best Practices Lessons Learned/Best Practices during the Department of Energy's Implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 OAS-RA-12-03 January 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 18, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on "Lessons Learned/Best Practices during the Department of Energy's Implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009" BACKGROUND The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) was signed into law on February 17, 2009, as a way to jumpstart the U.S. economy, create or save millions of jobs, spur technological advances in science and health, and invest in the Nation's energy future. As part of

440

Lessons Learned from the Alternative Fuels Experience and How They Apply to the Development of a Hydrogen-Fueled Transportation System  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Lessons Learned from the Lessons Learned from the Alternative Fuels Experience and How They Apply to the Development of a Hydrogen- Fueled Transportation System M. Melendez, K. Theis, and C. Johnson Technical Report NREL/TP-560-40753 August 2007 NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute * Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Technical Report NREL/TP-560-40753 August 2007 Lessons Learned from the Alternative Fuels Experience and How They Apply to the Development of a Hydrogen-

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

CEQ Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Collaboration Collaboration in NEPA A Handbook for NEPA Practitioners o c t o b e r 2 0 0 7 c o u n c i l o n e n v i r o n m e n t a l q u a l i t y This handbook presents the results of research and consultations by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) concerning the consideration of collaboration in analyses prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). It introduces the NEPA practitioner and other interested parties to the issue of collaboration, outlines general principles, presents useful steps, and provides information on methods of collaboration. The handbook is informational and does not establish new requirements for collaboration or public involvement. It is not and should not be viewed as formal CEQ guidance on this matter, nor are the recommendations in the handbook intended

442

Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and NEPA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Council on Environmental Quality memorandum provides general information on (1) the response to hurricane Katrina; (2) reporting oil and chemical spills; (3) projected long term recovery efforts; and (4) how agencies can respond to emergencies and comply with NEPA.

443

Text-Alternative Version: Solid-State Lighting Early Lessons Learned Webinar  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Linda Sandahl: Welcome, ladies and gentlemen. I'm Linda Sandahl with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and I'd like to welcome you to today's webcast, Solid-State Lighting: Early Lessons...

444

E-Print Network 3.0 - aging lessons learned Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

I have read, initialed, understand and hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the Gator Swim Lessons Program as defined in subsequent pages. I recognize all sales are final...

445

CEQ NEPA & EMS Guide  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Environmental Policy Act Processes with Environmental Management Systems c o u n c i l o n e n v i r o n m e n t a l q u a l i t y A Guide for NEPA and EMS Practitioners a p r i l 2 0 0 7 Preface This guide builds on research and consultations undertaken by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) on the complementary aspects of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Environmental Management Systems (EMS). It introduces issues and provides information on how NEPA and EMS can be aligned. This guide does not establish new requirements, does not constitute formal CEQ guidance, and its recommendations should not be considered legally binding. A Guide for NEPA and EMS Practitioners  Aligning National Environmental Policy Act Processes with Environmental Management Systems

446

NEPA Documents | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Documents Documents NEPA Documents To see a list of available NEPA documents by type and sorted by publication date, click on the links below. Documents listed in this section are available to members of the public. To see documents not electronically available to the public see the Secure NEPA Documents page for more information. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Categorical exclusions are categories of actions that DOE has determined, by regulation, do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and for which, therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement normally is required. DOE's categorical exclusions are listed in Appendices A and B to Subpart D of its NEPA regulations,10 CFR Part 1021.

447

Memorandum: Emergency Actions and NEPA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2005 8, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR FEDERAL NEPA CONTACTS FROM: HORST G. GRECZMIEL Associate Director for NEPA Oversight SUBJECT: Emergency Actions and NEPA This memorandum provides: * General information on the response to Katrina * Reporting oil and chemical spills * Projected long term recovery efforts * How agencies can respond to emergencies and comply with NEPA. Please distribute this memorandum to your agency planning and environmental personnel. General information on the response to Katrina: Information is available on the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov and specifics on the government's response are provided at the "What Government is Doing" link which can be directly accessed at http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0712.xml

448

NEPA-Related Public Involvement  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Loan Programs Offices NEPA-related hearings, public meetings, and public notices (e.g. public scoping meeting, public hearing, notice of proposed floodplain or wetland action) are presented...

449

General Guidance on NEPA | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

General Guidance on NEPA General Guidance on NEPA General Guidance on NEPA Selected documents providing General Guidance on NEPA. March 1, 2011 DOE, NEPA, and YOU A pamphlet providing information on public participation and NEPA. December 1, 2007 A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard This guide is based on research and consultations undertaken by the Council on Environmental Quality concerning the need for a Citizen's Guide to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Participants in NEPA Regional Roundtables held in 2003-2004 clearly voiced the need for an guide that provides an explanation of NEPA, how it is implemented, and how people outside the Federal government - individual citizens, private sector applicants, members of organized groups, or representatives of Tribal,

450

GC NEPA Listserv | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Action Center » Sign Up for GC Updates » GC NEPA Listserv Action Center » Sign Up for GC Updates » GC NEPA Listserv GC NEPA Listserv Subscribe to NEPA Updates The Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance maintains two Listserv lists to provide a central notification system for (1) DOE NEPA news, including announcements, notices, and related documents posted on this website, and (2) draft Environmental Assessments. Please use the following instructions to subscribe to both or either of these updates. * NEPA-Updates Listserv: Receive email notification of NEPA News updates in your email inbox, by sending an email to Listserv@listserv.doe.gov with "Subscribe NEPA-Updates" followed by your FIRST NAME and LAST NAME, in the body of the email (i.e., Subscribe NEPA-Updates John Doe). Do not include your signature block or any other data in the body of the

451

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Project_!.!!formatlon Doll!r Reseed~ ~u.pment and Ol.mp lludts The table below Ia to be completed by the Project Lead and ,.vi-ed by the Envwonmental Spec1ull.r ao\d the DOll NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE, If Ch *r :,r· ol .ir.Uf · OC" '" , PtOj

452

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 Project Information Project T itle: Repair flowline 77 -S-1 0 Date: 3111/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Wes Riesland Project Overview The flowline leak at 77 -s-1 0 surfaced on the location but we had to follow the line off the location to find the 1. What are the environmental impacts? hole in the pipe. This took us up the hill going south aproximatily 120 feet from the well head. We were able 2. What is the legal location? to successfully clamp the leak. 3. What is the duration of the projed? This flowline runs from the well 77 -s-1 0 to the B-2-1 0 manifold. 4. What major equipment will be used Approximately 6 hours to complete if any (worn over rig. drilling rig. etc.)? backhoe and opperator and one hand The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

453

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

. NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project lnfonnation Project Title: Reclamation of Pits and Boxes Date: Nov. 3, 2010 DOE Code: 6740.010.00000 Contractor Code: 8067-451 Project Lead: Anthony Bowler Project Overview Reclamation of QD.]y the following Pits and Boxes : 1. Brief project description [include 1. B-2-1 0 Skim Box anything that could impact the 2. B-1-14 Skim Box environment 3. Near66-1-STX-14 Pit 2. Legal location 4. T-5-10 Skim Box 3. Duration of the project 5. WDFUpperPit 6. WDFLowerPit 4. Major equipment to be used 7. WDFSkimBox 8. B-1-3 Pit 9. B-1 -3 Skim Box 10. T-2-34 Pit 11 . B-1-10 Pit 12. B-1 -10 Skim Box 13. SE of SG3 & Welding Shop Skim Box 14. 58.Q4-1-SX-3 Skim Box 15. Near Tank 126 Skim Box 16. 77-1-SX-3 NW of Well Pit 17. T-5-3 Pit

454

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Log Deep Well Log Deep Well Date: 1/1212010 DOE Code: 6730.020.81019 Contractor Code: I 8067-756 Project Lead: Brian Black Project Overview This project will test prototype logg1 n_g tools 1 n a previously drilled deep well. The should not be any neglible 1. What are the environmental impacts? impacts to the environment. The tools will be lowered up and down a wellbore Via wireline cable and truck. 2. What is the legal location? This test will take place on the drilling rig at 45-3-X-21 3. What is the duration of the project? 4, What major equipment will be used The project will last for 3-4 days. if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The drilling ng will be used as a overflead crane to lift the sheave pulley that the cable will run across. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

455

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Repair flowline 100 feet North of 71-3-SX-3 Date: 2-16-2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Rick Mclaughlin Project Overview Emergency Repair tor a "owline leak north of 71-3-SX-3. Dug up pipeline, repaired line and backfilled with 1. What are the environmental impacts? clean fill dirt. Oil contaminated soH was hauled to the east side landfarm and dean dirt was brought in from section 20. 2 What 1s the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? North of 71-3-SX-3. N43 1 7'53 6~ W. 10611'49.3" 4. What major equipment will be used Approximately 4 hours if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe with operator and one wor1NEPA

456

Savannah River Site, Liquid Waste Program, Savannah River Remediation American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Benefits and Lessons Learned - 12559  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Utilizing funding provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the Liquid Waste Program at Savannah River site successfully executed forty-one design, procurement, construction, and operating activities in the period from September 2009 through December 2011. Project Management of the program included noteworthy practices involving safety, integrated project teams, communication, and cost, schedule and risk management. Significant upgrades to plant capacity, progress toward waste tank closure and procurement of needed infrastructure were accomplished. Over 1.5 million hours were worked without a single lost work day case. Lessons Learned were continually identified and applied to enhance the program. Investment of Recovery Act monies into the Liquid Waste Program has ensured continued success in the disposition of radioactive wastes and the closure of high level waste tanks at SRS. The funding of a portion of the Liquid Waste Program at SRS by ARRA was a major success. Significant upgrades to plant capacity, progress toward waste tank closure and procurement of needed infrastructure was accomplished. Integrated Project Teams ensured quality products and services were provided to the Operations customers. Over 1.5 million hours were worked without a single lost work day case. Lessons Learned were continually reviewed and reapplied to enhance the program. Investment of Recovery Act monies into the Liquid Waste Program has ensured continued success in the disposition of radioactive wastes and the closure of high level waste tanks at SRS. (authors)

Schmitz, Mark A.; Crouse, Thomas N. [Savannah River Remediation, Aiken, South Carolina 29808 (United States)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

457

Lessons Learned in the Design and Use of IP1 / IP2 Flexible Packaging - 13621  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

For many years in the USA, Low Level Radioactive Waste (LLW), contaminated soils and construction debris, have been transported, interim stored, and disposed of, using IP1 / IP2 metal containers. The performance of these containers has been more than adequate, with few safety occurrences. The containers are used under the regulatory oversight of the US Department of Transportation (DOT), 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). In the late 90's the introduction of flexible packaging for the transport, storage, and disposal of low level contaminated soils and construction debris was introduced. The development of flexible packaging came out of a need for a more cost effective package, for the large volumes of waste generated by the decommissioning of many of the US Department of Energy (DOE) legacy sites across the US. Flexible packaging had to be designed to handle a wide array of waste streams, including soil, gravel, construction debris, and fine particulate dust migration. The design also had to meet all of the IP1 requirements under 49CFR 173.410, and be robust enough to pass the IP2 testing 49 CFR 173.465 required for many LLW shipments. Tens of thousands of flexible packages have been safely deployed and used across the US nuclear industry as well as for hazardous non-radioactive applications, with no recorded release of radioactive materials. To ensure that flexible packages are designed properly, the manufacturer must use lessons learned over the years, and the tests performed to provide evidence that these packages are suitable for transporting low level radioactive wastes. The design and testing of flexible packaging for LLW, VLLW and other hazardous waste streams must be as strict and stringent as the design and testing of metal containers. The design should take into consideration the materials being loaded into the package, and should incorporate the right materials, and manufacturing methods, to provide a quality, safe product. Flexible packaging can be shown to meet the criteria for safe and fit for purpose packaging, by meeting the US DOT regulations, and the IAEA Standards for IP-1 and IP-2 including leak tightness. (authors)

Sanchez, Mike [VP Global Sales, PacTec, Inc. (United States)] [VP Global Sales, PacTec, Inc. (United States); Reeves, Wendall [National Sales Manager, PacTec, Inc. (United States)] [National Sales Manager, PacTec, Inc. (United States); Smart, Bill [Nuclear Sales Director, PacTec, Inc. (United States)] [Nuclear Sales Director, PacTec, Inc. (United States)

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

NEPA Cases Filed in 2010 2010 NEPA Case Dispositions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Filed in 2010 2010 NEPA Case Dispositions Filed in 2010 2010 NEPA Case Dispositions Lead Defendant Cases Filed Injunctions - Remands Judgment for defendant 46 ARMY-USACE 6 3 Dismissal w/o settlement 11 DHS-USCG 0 0 Settlement 8 DOD 1 0 Adverse dispositions: 17 DOE-Energy 0 0 TRO 0 DOE-FERC 0 0 Preliminary Injunction 5 DOE-NNSA 1 0 Permanent Injunction 4 DOI-BIA 1 0 Remand 8 DOI-BLM 17 5 DOI-BOEM 5 0 Basis for 2010 NEPA Dispositions DOI-BOR 0 0 Jurisdictional - P prevailed 0 DOI-FWS 6 1 Jurisdictional - D prevailed 12 DOI-OSM 0 1 NEPA - Not required 1 DOI-NPS 2 2 NEPA - Is required 2 DOJ 0 0 CE - Adequate 4 DOS 0 0 CE - Not Adequate 1 DOT-FAA 3 0 EA - Adequate* 11 DOT-FHWA 10 1 EA - Not Adequate* 5 DOT-FTA 2 0 EIS - Adequate* 17 EPA 1 0 EIS - Not Adequate* 5

459

NEPA and Other Laws | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NEPA and Other Laws NEPA and Other Laws NEPA and Other Laws Selected documents providing guidance on the relationship between NEPA and other laws. March 5, 2013 NEPA and CEQA: Integrating State and Federal Environmental Reviews (Draft) The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), in collaboration with the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, issued on March 5, 2013, a draft handbook on integrating NEPA and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review processes. The guide provides practitioners with an overview of NEPA and CEQA as well as valuable suggestions for developing a single environmental review process that can meet the requirements of both statutes. March 5, 2013 NEPA and NHPA: A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 In this document the Council on Environmental Quality and the Advisory

460

Lessons learned and new challenges for integrated assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

One of the first government-sponsored demands for integrated assessment to support decision making in the United States is embodied in the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Over the past 25 years, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has supported federal agencies` in evaluating health and environmental impacts as required by NEPA. Many of ORNL`s efforts have focused on complex, programmatic assessments that break new ground and require and integrate expertise from a wide range of technical disciplines. Examples of ORNL projects that illustrate the use of integrated assessment approaches include environmental documentation for: (1) the Department of the Army`s Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program, (2) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission`s licensing activities related to the Owens River Basin in eastern California and along a 500-mile reach of the upper Ohio River, and (3) the Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s decision regarding restart of the undamaged reactor (Unit 1) at Three Mile Island. Our discussion of these examples illustrates successful integrated assessment approaches and identifies new challenges facing integrated assessment activities.

Carnes, S.A.; Reed, R.M.

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Procedures for Submitting Documents for Posting on the DOE NEPA...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Procedures for Submitting Documents for Posting on the DOE NEPA Website Procedures for Submitting Documents for Posting on the DOE NEPA Website The Electronic DOE NEPA document...

462

Federal Agency NEPA Implementing Procedures  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Agency NEPA Implementing Procedures Agency NEPA Implementing Procedures Note: Some Departments' agencies have their own NEPA implementing procedures. To access Department-wide NEPA implementing procedures, click on the name of the Federal Department. To access NEPA implementing procedures for Department's agencies, click on the provided links. Department/ Agency: Division: Link: Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi- in/text- idx?c=ecfr&SID=47c103e07fd64e933c7f74c 4b3c4ac9a&rgn=div5&view=text&node=7:6. 1 2 1 8&id 7 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- idx?c=ecfr&SID=47c103e07fd64e933c7f74c 4b3c4ac9a&rgn=div5&view=text&node=7:5. 1.1.1.21&idno=7 Farm Service Agency http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-

463

NEPA Implementation | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Implementation Implementation NEPA Implementation Selected documents providing guidance on the implementation of NEPA. September 7, 2012 OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution This Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) joint memorandum expands and builds on the November 28, 2005, Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) Memorandum, directing departments and agencies to increase the appropriate and effective use of third-party assisted environmental collaboration as well as environmental conflict resolution to resolve problems and conflicts that arise in the context of environmental, public lands, or natural resources issues, including matters related to energy, transportation, and water and land management.

464

Nuclear Power 2010 Program Lessons Learned Report on the Combined Construction and Operating License/Design Certification Demonstration Projects  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Power 2010 Program Combined Construction and Operating License & Design Certification Demonstration Projects Lessons Learned Report August 30, 2012 Prepared by Longenecker and Associates DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not

465

The link between economy and environment in the post-crisis era: lessons learned from slow steaming  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The crisis in shipping during the last years was synonymous with low demand for transport, low freight rates and high bunker prices. Sailing at speeds lower than the design speed reduces total fuel consumption resulting in bunker cost savings. Therefore, during the crisis slow steaming has been extensively exercised and some modern vessels were operating at half of their design speed. Given that fuel costs and emissions are directly proportional to one another (both being directly proportional to fuel used), it appears that reducing both could be a straightforward way towards a 'win-win' solution. Thus, this paper discusses the lessons learned by slow steaming providing the link between economy and the environment which is fundamental towards sustainability in shipping.

Christos A. Kontovas; Harilaos N. Psaraftis

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

Laying the Groundwork: Lessons Learned from the Telecommunications Industry for Distributed Generation; Preprint  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The telecommunications industry went through growing pains in the past that hold some interesting lessons for the growing distributed generation (DG) industry. The technology shifts and stakeholders involved with the historic market transformation of the telecommunications sector mirror similar factors involved in distributed generation today. An examination of these factors may inform best practices when approaching the conduits necessary to accelerate the shifting of our nation's energy system to cleaner forms of generation and use. From a technical perspective, the telecom industry in the 1990s saw a shift from highly centralized systems that had no capacity for adaptation to highly adaptive, distributed network systems. From a management perspective, the industry shifted from small, private-company structures to big, capital-intensive corporations. This presentation will explore potential correlation and outline the lessons that we can take away from this comparison.

Wise, A. L.

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

Lessons learned -- a comparison of the proposed on-site waste management facilities at the various Department of Energy sites  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy Sites (DOE) are faced with the challenge of managing several categories of waste generated from past or future cleanup activities, such as 11(e)2 byproduct material, low-level radioactive (LL), low-level radioactive mixed (LLM), transuranic (TRU), high level radioactive (HL), and hazardous waste (HW). DOE must ensure safe and efficient management of these wastes while complying with all applicable federal and state laws. Proposed waste management strategies for the EM-40 Environmental Restoration (ER) program at these sites indicate that on-site disposal is becoming a viable option. For purposes of this paper, on-site disposal cells managed by the EM-40 program at Hanford, Weldon Spring, Fernald Environmental Management Project (FEMP) and Rocky Flats were compared. Programmatic aspects and design features were evaluated to determine what comparisons can be made, and to identify benefits lessons learned that may be applicable to other sites. Based on comparative analysis, it can be concluded that the DOE EM-40 disposal cells are very unique. Stakeholders played a major role in the decision to locate the various DOE on-site disposal facilities. The disposal cells will be used to manage 11(e)2 by-product materials, LL, LLM, and/or HLW. The analysis further suggests that the design criteria are comparable. Lessons learned relative to the public involvement activities at Weldon Spring, and the design approach at Hanford should be considered when planning future on-site disposal facilities at DOE sites. Further, a detailed analysis of progress made at Hanford should be evaluated for application at sites such as Rocky Flats that are currently planning on-site disposal facilities.

Ciocco, J. [Dept. of Energy, Germantown, MD (United States); Singh, D. [Booz Allen and Hamilton, Germantown, MD (United States); Survochak, S. [DOE RFETS, Golden, CO (United States); Elo, M. [Burns and Roe, Germantown, MD (United States)

1996-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

468

University Reactor Conversion Lessons Learned Workshop for Texas A&M University Nuclear Science Center Reactor  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objectives of this meeting were to capture the observations, insights, issues, concerns, and ideas of those involved in the Texas A&M University Nuclear Science Center (TAMU NSC) TRIGA Reactor Conversion so that future efforts can be conducted with greater effectiveness, efficiency, and with fewer challenges. This workshop was held in conjunction with a similar workshop for the University of Florida Reactor Conversion. Some of the generic lessons from that workshop are included in this report for completeness.

Eric C. Woolstenhulme; Dana M. Meyer

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

Form:NEPA Doc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY Input the name of a NEPA Document below. If the document already exists, you will be able to edit its information. AddEdit a NEPA Document Retrieved from...

470

NEPA Policy Statement | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Policy Statement NEPA Policy Statement NEPA Policy Statement The NEPA process is a valuable planning tool and provides an opportunity to improve the Department of Energy decisions and build public trust. Reviews of the Department's NEPA program have shown that the Department must change the way it conducts its business to avoid unnecessary delays and reap the full benefits of the NEPA process. The Department must conduct the process as a team effort to make NEPA work better and cost less. The following new policies will streamline the NEPA process, minimize the cost and time for document preparation and review, emphasize teamwork, and make the process more useful to decision makers and the public. Except where specifically indicated otherwise, these policies are immediately effective.

471

Category:NEPA Properties | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Properties Properties Jump to: navigation, search These are properties specific to NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) Documents. Additional properties are used in the documents. Pages in category "NEPA Properties" The following 52 pages are in this category, out of 52 total. A Property:Applicant B Property:BLM CaseType C Property:CXReference D Property:DayQuantity E Property:EnergyTechnology Property:EnvironmentalAnalysisType F Property:FundingAgencies G Property:GeothermalDevelopmentPhases L Property:LeadAgency M Property:ManagingDistrictOffice Property:ManagingFieldOffice Property:MineralManager N Property:NEPA Application Property:NEPA Application Type Property:NEPA Application Url Property:NEPA ApplicationAttachments Property:NEPA ApplicationDate Property:NEPA CategoricalExclusion

472

CEQ NEPA & EMS Guide Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CEQ Publishes NEPA-EMS Guide CEQ Publishes NEPA-EMS Guide "The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has published Aligning NEPA Processes with Environmental Management Systems - A Guide for NEPA and EMS Practitioner. This guide provides practitioners with a tool to improve NEPA implementation and achieve the environmental sustainability goals laid out in NEPA and Executive Order 13423: 'to create and maintain conditions, under which humans and nature can exist in productive harmony, that permit fulfilling the social, economic, and other requirements of present and future generations of Americans.'" James L. Connaughton Chairman, CEQ * CEQ's goal is to continue developing tools to improve and modernize NEPA. This Guide was developed help practitioners make NEPA implementation more effective and

473

E-Print Network 3.0 - aged plants-lessons learned Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

range of access, part... -time and distance learning courses that can lead to University Certificates, Diplomas and Degrees. The ... Source: Swain, Peter - Centre for Systems...

474

E-Print Network 3.0 - accident lessons learned Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 Why System Safety Professionals Should Read Accident Reports C. M. Holloway*, C. W. Johnson Summary: seek to learn from the results of accident investigations. We believe that...

475

Lessons Learned: A review of utility experience with conservation and load management programs for commercial and industrial customers  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report examines utility experience with conservation and load management (C LM) programs of commercial and industrial (C I) customers in order to summarize the lessons learned from program experiences to date and what these teach us about how to operate successful programs in the future. This analysis was motivated by a desire to learn about programs which achieve high participation rates and high electricity savings while remaining cost effective. Also, we wanted to review the very latest experiences with innovative program approaches -- approaches that might prove useful to utilities as they scale up their C LM activities. Specific objectives of this phase of the study are threefold: (1) To disseminate information on utility C LM experience to a nationwide audience. (2) To review current New York State utility programs and make suggestions on how these programs can be improved. (3) To collect data for the final phase of the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy/New York State Energy Research and Development Authority project, which will examine the savings that are achievable if C LM programs are pushed to the limit'' of current knowledge on how to structure and run cost-effective C LM programs. 19 tabs.

Nadel, S.

1990-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

Other NEPA Guidance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Other NEPA Guidance Other NEPA Guidance Other NEPA Guidance Selected documents prepared by a variety of agencies that provide guidance on the NEPA process. December 31, 2009 Presidential Proclamation on the 40th Anniversary of the National Environmental Policy Act Proclamation of President Obama to "call upon all executive branch agencies to promote public involvement and transparency in their implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act." July 1, 1998 Managing NEPA at the Department of Energy A report, by the National Academy of Public Administration, on the management of NEPA within the Department of Energy. January 23, 1995 The Application of NEPA to CERCLA Cleanups On March 31, 1994, officials from the Departrnent of Energy (DOE), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Council on Environmental

477

NEPA Litigation Surveys | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Litigation Surveys NEPA Litigation Surveys NEPA Litigation Surveys CEQ publishes surveys on NEPA litigation on an annual basis. These surveys identify the number of cases involving a NEPA based cause of action, Federal agencies that were identified as a lead defendant, general information on plaintiffs, general information on why litigation was pursued, and the outcomes of the cases decided during the year. Each year, Federal agencies conduct hundreds of EISs, tens of thousands of EAs and hundreds of thousands of CEs. The amount of litigation on these NEPA analyses is comparatively small. Since 2001, fewer than 175 NEPA cases were filed each year - with less than 100 filed in 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011. The annual surveys are provided below: 2011 Litigation Survey 2010 Litigation Survey

478

NEPA Litigation Surveys | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NEPA Litigation Surveys NEPA Litigation Surveys NEPA Litigation Surveys CEQ publishes surveys on NEPA litigation on an annual basis. These surveys identify the number of cases involving a NEPA based cause of action, Federal agencies that were identified as a lead defendant, general information on plaintiffs, general information on why litigation was pursued, and the outcomes of the cases decided during the year. Each year, Federal agencies conduct hundreds of EISs, tens of thousands of EAs and hundreds of thousands of CEs. The amount of litigation on these NEPA analyses is comparatively small. Since 2001, fewer than 175 NEPA cases were filed each year - with less than 100 filed in 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011. The annual surveys are provided below: 2011 Litigation Survey 2010 Litigation Survey

479

All NEPA Guidance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Guidance & Requirements » Guidance » All NEPA Guidance Guidance & Requirements » Guidance » All NEPA Guidance All NEPA Guidance Council on Environmental Quality Guidance Final Guidance on Improving the Process for Preparing Efficient and Timely Environmental Reviews Under the National Environmental Policy Act (2012) Appropriate Use of Mitigation and Monitoring and Clarifying the Appropriate Use of Mitigated Findings of No Significant Impact (2011) Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on Establishing, Applying, and Revising Categorical Exclusions under NEPA (2010) Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies: Emergencies and NEPA (2010) A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard (2007) Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in Cumulative Effects Analysis (2005) Memorandum for Federal NEPA Contacts: Emergency Actions and

480

Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE Facilities, April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Oversight Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Facilities May 2011 Late Fall 2012 April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Overall Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 3

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "nepa lessons learned" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.