Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "ne-id 208-526-5277 208-351-3830" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

DOE site facility mgt contracts Internet Posting 5-2-11.xlsx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6/30/2011 6/30/2011 2 three month option periods until protest resolved 9/30/2011 M&O 1999 http://www.id.energy.gov/PSD/AMWTPHomepage.html Mike Adams 208-526-5277 Wendy Bauer 208-526-2808 Paducah Remediation EM LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky 4/22/2010 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 Site Clean up 2009 http://www.emcbc.doe.gov/dept/contracting/primecontracts.php Pam Thompson 859-219-4056 Bill Creech 859-219-4044 West Valley Demonstration Project EM West Valley Environmental Svcs 6/29/2007 6/30/2011 6/30/2011 Site Clean up 2007 http://www.emcbc.doe.gov/dept/contracting/primecontracts.php Ralph Holland 513-246-0550 Derrick Franklin 513-246-0103 Argonne National Laboratory SC UChicago Argonne, LLC 7/31/2006 9/30/2011 4 yrs Award Term Earned/additional 11 yrs Award

2

DOE Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

transition) transition) 6/15/1999 6/30/2011 2 three month option periods 9/30/2011 M&O 1999 http://www.id.energy.gov/PSD/AMWTPHomepage.html Mike Adams 208-526-5277 Wendy Bauer 208-526-2808 Paducah Remediation EM LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky 4/22/2010 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 Site Clean up 2009 http://www.emcbc.doe.gov/dept/contracting/primecontracts.php Pam Thompson 859-219-4056 Bill Creech 859-219-4044 Argonne National Laboratory SC UChicago Argonne, LLC 7/31/2006 9/30/2015 4 yrs Award Term Earned/additional 11 yrs Award Term Available 9/30/2026 M&O 2006 http://www.anl.gov/contract/ Patricia Schuneman 630-252-2956 Sergio Martinez 630-252-2075 Kristin Palmer 630-252-2127 Oak Ridge Environmental Management

3

Basis for Section 3116 Determination for the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center Tank Farm Facility at the Idaho National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NE-ID-11226 NE-ID-11226 Revision 0 Basis for Section 3116 Determination for the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center Tank Farm Facility November 2006 DOE/NE-ID-11226 Revision 0 Basis for Section 3116 Determination for the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center Tank Farm Facility November 2006 ii CONTENTS ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................. vii 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE.................................................................................................. 1 2. BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Tank Farm Facility Description.............................................................................................

4

Microsoft Word - 2013 (05-22-13) DOE-ID Operations Summary-13...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

was restored to the E-3 diesel bus from commercial power, and equipment lost due to the power outage was restored. NE-ID--BEA-ATR-2013-0012 3 April 17: (Notification) As a...

5

Review of Implementation Verification Review Processes at the...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Complex for July 2011. * REP-OS-372011-20474, Surveillance of the In-Place HEPA Filter Testing Program at the Materials and Fuels Complex. * ORPS NE-ID-BEA-HFEF-2011-0002,...

6

Distribution List: For Action: Joseph A. McBrearty, SC-3 John...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Distribution List: For Action: Joseph A. McBrearty, SC-3 John E. Surash, EM-50 Carol Battershell, GFO Richard Provencher, NE-ID William C. Gibson, FE-44 For Information: Barbara...

7

Distribution List: For Action: Joseph A. McBrearty, SC-3 John E. Surash, EM-50  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Distribution List: Distribution List: For Action: Joseph A. McBrearty, SC-3 John E. Surash, EM-50 Carol Battershell, GFO Richard Provencher, NE-ID William C. Gibson, FE-44 For Information: Barbara Jackson, SC-OR Patricia Schuneman, SC-CH Jeffrey C. Armstrong, SR David Hess, EMCBC Diane Snow, CBFO Michael Adams, NE-ID Kelly Gele, FE-4451 Department of Energy M&O CONTRACTOR PURCHASING SYSTEM BALANCED SCORECARD PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Core Performance Measures FY 2014 ISSUED: 08/21/2013 LEARNING AND GROWTH - Employee Satisfaction - Employee Alignment FINANCIAL - Optimum Cost Efficiency of Purchasing Operations - Financial Contributions of Procurement via Cost Savings MISSION VISION STRATEGY CUSTOMER - Customer Satisfaction INTERNAL BUSINESS

8

Enforcement Letter, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter, Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC - September 14, 2009 September 14, 2009 Enforcement Letter issued to Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC related to a Failed Scram Event at the Neutron Radiography Reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Enforcement, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an evaluation of the deficiencies associated with the Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) report NE-ID--BEA-NRAD-2008-0003, Shim Rod #2 Failure to SCRAM. Our evaluation included a review of documents and discussions with site personnel. Documents reviewed included the Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA) Cause Analysis Report and Corrective Action Plan NE-ID-BEA-NRAD-2008-0003, Shim

9

Sodium-bearing Waste Treatment Technology Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect

Sodium-bearing waste (SBW) disposition is one of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operation Office’s (NE-ID) and State of Idaho’s top priorities at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). The INEEL has been working over the past several years to identify a treatment technology that meets NE-ID and regulatory treatment requirements, including consideration of stakeholder input. Many studies, including the High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), have resulted in the identification of five treatment alternatives that form a short list of perhaps the most appropriate technologies for the DOE to select from. The alternatives are (a) calcination with maximum achievable control technology (MACT) upgrade, (b) steam reforming, (c) cesium ion exchange (CsIX) with immobilization, (d) direct evaporation, and (e) vitrification. Each alternative has undergone some degree of applied technical development and preliminary process design over the past four years. This report presents a summary of the applied technology and process design activities performed through February 2004. The SBW issue and the five alternatives are described in Sections 2 and 3, respectively. Details of preliminary process design activities for three of the alternatives (steam reforming, CsIX, and direct evaporation) are presented in three appendices. A recent feasibility study provides the details for calcination. There have been no recent activities performed with regard to vitrification; that section summarizes and references previous work.

Charles M. Barnes; Arlin L. Olson; Dean D. Taylor

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Independent Oversight Inspection, Idaho National Laboratory - August 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection, Idaho National Laboratory - Inspection, Idaho National Laboratory - August 2007 Independent Oversight Inspection, Idaho National Laboratory - August 2007 August 2007 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Idaho National Laboratory's Materials and Fuels Complex The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), inspected environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Idaho Operations Office (ID) and the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) during June and July 2007. The ES&H inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. NE, ID, and BEA have many aspects of an effective ISM program in place, and

11

Certification Package Status Table_12_11_08.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review Reclame Process Returned to PSO On CRB Agenda (Date) CRB Interview (Date) On Hold by PSO EE GO Dins, Randall I 10/23/2008 11/17/2008 EE GO Collette, Gregory II 12/1/2008 EM ID Arenaz, Mark III 9/25/2008 9/29/2008 X EM RL Dagan, Ellen II 12/1/2008 12/4/2008 EM RL Harp, Benton III 9/11/2008 9/16/2008 11/21/2008 1/9/2009 EM RL Fletcher,Thomas W II 9/19/2008 EM HQ Logan, Pamela I 12/11/2008 EM RL Mattlin, Ellen II 9/30/2008 EM ID O'Neill,Kevin C. I 12/3/2008 EM ORP Pak, Paul IV 09/29/08 11/21/2008 1/9/2009 NE ID Perry,Jeffrey N I 10/15/2008 EM RL Sands, John P. II 9/29/2008 5/9/08 3/26/08 12/11/2008 X EM HQ Schneider,Steven P I 10/1/2008 FE SPR Judice, Todd M. II 7/14/2008 X NNSA LASO Estrada, Joe III 10/10/2008 X OCRWM YMP Compton, James I 12/1/2008 12/2/2008 SC PNSO Henderson, Chad III 5/12/2008 SC LSO Joma,Hannibal II 11/10/2008 11/6/2008 7/31/2008

12

The Removal Action Work Plan for CPP-603A Basin Facility  

SciTech Connect

This revised Removal Action Work Plan describes the actions to be taken under the non-time-critical removal action recommended in the Action Memorandum for the Non-Time Critical Removal Action at the CPP-603A Basins, Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center, as evaluated in the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis for the CPP-603A Basin Non-Time Critical Removal Action, Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center. The regulatory framework outlined in this Removal Action Work Plan has been modified from the description provided in the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (DOE/NE-ID-11140, Rev. 1, August 2004). The modification affects regulation of sludge removal, treatment, and disposal, but the end state and technical approaches have not changed. Revision of this document had been delayed until the basin sludge was successfully managed. This revision (Rev. 1) has been prepared to provide information that was not previously identified in Rev. 0 to describe the removal, treatment, and disposal of the basin water at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) CERCLA Disposal Facility evaporation ponds and fill the basins with grout/controlled low strength material (CLSM) was developed. The Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis for the CPP-603A Basin Non-Time Critical Removal Action, Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center - conducted pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act - evaluated risks associated with deactivation of the basins and alternatives for addressing those risks. The decision to remove and dispose of the basin water debris not containing uranium grouted in place after the sludge has been removed and managed under the Hazardous Waste Management Act/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act has been documented in the Act Memorandum for the Non-Time Critical Removal Action at the CPP-603A Basins, Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center.

B. T. Richards

2006-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

13

Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming of INEEL SBW Using THORsm Mineralizing Technology  

SciTech Connect

Sodium bearing waste (SBW) disposition is one of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operation Office’s (NE-ID) and State of Idaho’s top priorities at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). Many studies have resulted in the identification of five treatment alternatives that form a short list of perhaps the most appropriate technologies for the DOE to select from. The alternatives are (a) calcination with maximum achievable control technology (MACT) upgrade, (b) steam reforming, (c) cesium ion exchange (CsIX) with immobilization, (d) direct evaporation, and (e) vitrification. Each alternative has undergone some degree of applied technical development and preliminary process design over the past four years. DOE desired further experimental data, with regard to steam reforming technology, to make informed decisions concerning selection of treatment technology for SBW. Mineralizing steam reforming technology, offered by THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC would produce a denitrated, granular mineral waste form using a high-temperature fluidized bed process. A pilot scale demonstration of the technology was performed in a 15-cm-diameter reactor vessel September 27 through October 1, 2004. The pilot scale equipment is owned by the DOE, and located at the Science and Technology Applications Research (STAR) Center in Idaho Falls, ID. Flowsheet chemistry and operational parameters were defined through a collaborative effort involving Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), and THOR Treatment Technologies personnel. Personnel from Science Applications International Corporation, owners of the STAR Center, operated the pilot plant. The pilot scale test was terminated as planned after achieving a total of 100 hrs of cumulative/continuous processing operation. About 230 kg of SBW surrogate were processed that resulted in about 88 kg of solid product, a mass reduction of about 62%. The process achieved about a 90% turnover of the starting bed. Samples of mineralized solid product materials were analyzed for chemical/physical properties. Results of product performance testing conducted by SRNL will be reported separately by SRNL.

Arlin L. Olson; Nicholas R. Soelberg; Douglas W. Marshall; Gary L. Anderson

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z