National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for ne-id 208-526-5277 208-351-3830

  1. DOE Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    3312011 2 three month option periods until protest resolved 9302011 M&O 1999 http:www.id.energy.govPSDAMWTPHomepage.html Mike Adams 208-526-5277 Wendy Bauer 208-526-2808 ...

  2. DOE Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    transition) 6151999 6302011 2 three month option periods 9302011 M&O 1999 http:www.id.energy.govPSDAMWTPHomepage.html Mike Adams 208-526-5277 Wendy Bauer 208-526-2808 ...

  3. DOE Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    transition) 6/15/1999 6/30/2011 2 three month option periods 9/30/2011 M&O 1999 http://www.id.energy.gov/PSD/AMWTPHomepage.html Mike Adams 208-526-5277 Wendy Bauer 208-526-2808 Paducah Remediation EM LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky 4/22/2010 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 Site Clean up 2009 http://www.emcbc.doe.gov/dept/contracting/primecontracts.php Pam Thompson 859-219-4056 Bill Creech 859-219-4044 Argonne National Laboratory SC UChicago Argonne, LLC 7/31/2006 9/30/2015 4 yrs Award Term

  4. DOE Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    3/31/2011 2 three month option periods until protest resolved 9/30/2011 M&O 1999 http://www.id.energy.gov/PSD/AMWTPHomepage.html Mike Adams 208-526-5277 Wendy Bauer 208-526-2808 Portsmouth Remediation EM LATA/Parallax 1/10/2005 2/28/2011 2/28/2011 Site Clean up 2005 http://www.emcbc.doe.gov/dept/contracting/primecontracts.php Pam Thompson 859-219-4056 RJ Bell 859 -219-4055 Paducah Remediation EM LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky 4/22/2010 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 Site Clean up 2009

  5. DOE site facility mgt contracts Internet Posting 5-2-11.xlsx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    6/30/2011 2 three month option periods until protest resolved 9/30/2011 M&O 1999 http://www.id.energy.gov/PSD/AMWTPHomepage.html Mike Adams 208-526-5277 Wendy Bauer 208-526-2808 Paducah Remediation EM LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky 4/22/2010 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 Site Clean up 2009 http://www.emcbc.doe.gov/dept/contracting/primecontracts.php Pam Thompson 859-219-4056 Bill Creech 859-219-4044 West Valley Demonstration Project EM West Valley Environmental Svcs 6/29/2007 6/30/2011

  6. How To Series 1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Preparing for Auditing Success Submitted by Robert Blyth, U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office (NE-ID) For more information contact Bob Blyth @ Robert.Blyth@nuclear.energy.gov

  7. Distribution List: For Action: Joseph A. McBrearty, SC-3 John...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    SC-OR Patricia Schuneman, SC-CH Jeffrey C. Armstrong, SR David Hess, EMCBC Diane Snow, CBFO Michael Adams, NE-ID Kelly Gele, FE-4451 Department of Energy M&O CONTRACTOR...

  8. How To Series 1 PDF

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Preparing for Auditing Success Submitted by Robert Blyth, U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office (NE-ID) For more information contact Bob Blyth @ Robert.Blyth@nuclear.energy.gov

  9. DOE-Idaho Operations Summary For September 12 to September 26...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    tagouts was performed. (NE-ID-BEA-SMC-2011-0013). Sept. 22: A laborer suffered a torn tendon while trying to lift heavy equipment at University Building 4 on the INL's Research...

  10. doeid11129r1.pdf

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Roadmap November 2003 U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Using domestic, plant-derived resources to meet our fuel, power, and chemical needs for Agricultural Biomass Feedstock Supply in the United States DOE/NE-ID-11129 Revision 1 1 Product Disclaimer References herein to, or depictions of, any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,

  11. Sodium-bearing Waste Treatment Technology Evaluation Report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Charles M. Barnes; Arlin L. Olson; Dean D. Taylor

    2004-05-01

    Sodium-bearing waste (SBW) disposition is one of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operation Office’s (NE-ID) and State of Idaho’s top priorities at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). The INEEL has been working over the past several years to identify a treatment technology that meets NE-ID and regulatory treatment requirements, including consideration of stakeholder input. Many studies, including the High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), have resulted in the identification of five treatment alternatives that form a short list of perhaps the most appropriate technologies for the DOE to select from. The alternatives are (a) calcination with maximum achievable control technology (MACT) upgrade, (b) steam reforming, (c) cesium ion exchange (CsIX) with immobilization, (d) direct evaporation, and (e) vitrification. Each alternative has undergone some degree of applied technical development and preliminary process design over the past four years. This report presents a summary of the applied technology and process design activities performed through February 2004. The SBW issue and the five alternatives are described in Sections 2 and 3, respectively. Details of preliminary process design activities for three of the alternatives (steam reforming, CsIX, and direct evaporation) are presented in three appendices. A recent feasibility study provides the details for calcination. There have been no recent activities performed with regard to vitrification; that section summarizes and references previous work.

  12. Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming of INEEL SBW Using THORsm Mineralizing Technology

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Arlin L. Olson; Nicholas R. Soelberg; Douglas W. Marshall; Gary L. Anderson

    2004-12-01

    Sodium bearing waste (SBW) disposition is one of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Idaho Operation Office’s (NE-ID) and State of Idaho’s top priorities at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). Many studies have resulted in the identification of five treatment alternatives that form a short list of perhaps the most appropriate technologies for the DOE to select from. The alternatives are (a) calcination with maximum achievable control technology (MACT) upgrade, (b) steam reforming, (c) cesium ion exchange (CsIX) with immobilization, (d) direct evaporation, and (e) vitrification. Each alternative has undergone some degree of applied technical development and preliminary process design over the past four years. DOE desired further experimental data, with regard to steam reforming technology, to make informed decisions concerning selection of treatment technology for SBW. Mineralizing steam reforming technology, offered by THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC would produce a denitrated, granular mineral waste form using a high-temperature fluidized bed process. A pilot scale demonstration of the technology was performed in a 15-cm-diameter reactor vessel September 27 through October 1, 2004. The pilot scale equipment is owned by the DOE, and located at the Science and Technology Applications Research (STAR) Center in Idaho Falls, ID. Flowsheet chemistry and operational parameters were defined through a collaborative effort involving Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), and THOR Treatment Technologies personnel. Personnel from Science Applications International Corporation, owners of the STAR Center, operated the pilot plant. The pilot scale test was terminated as planned after achieving a total of 100 hrs of cumulative/continuous processing operation. About 230 kg of SBW surrogate were processed that resulted in about 88 kg of solid product, a mass reduction of about 62%. The process achieved about a 90% turnover of the starting bed. Samples of mineralized solid product materials were analyzed for chemical/physical properties. Results of product performance testing conducted by SRNL will be reported separately by SRNL.