Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "mgr lajos grof-tisza" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Lajos Grof-Tisza | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lajos Grof-Tisza Lajos Grof-Tisza About Us Lajos Grof-Tisza - Director, Office of Corporate Information Systems Lajos Grof-Tisza Mr. Lajos Grof-Tisza joined the Department of Energy in 2003 and currently serves as the Director of Corporate Information Systems. As the Director of Corporate Information Systems, Mr. Grof-Tisza is responsible for planning and managing the design, development, operation and maintenance of the Department's Integrated Management Navigation (iManage) program and projects; identify and implement business process automation initiatives; provide technical support for legacy systems operations and maintenance; provide technical support for web design, development and maintenance; manage cyber security and enterprise architecture activities; and serve as

2

Appendix 7 - Stripes Architecture Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Name: Department of Energy iManage Program Name: Department of Energy iManage Program Project ID: iManage Program STRIPES Project Project Manager: Mathew Sparks Program Mgr: Lajos Grof-Tisza Doc ID: STRIPES Technical Architecture Page i 8/30/2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Chief Financial Officer iManage Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System STRIPES Technical Architecture Overview Status of Document Draft Delivered Accepted Program Name: Department of Energy iManage Program Project ID: iManage Program STRIPES Project Project Manager: Mathew Sparks Program Mgr: Lajos Grof-Tisza Doc ID: STRIPES Technical Architecture Page ii 8/30/2012 Title Page Document Name: Strategic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System (STRIPES) Technical Architecture Overview

3

Appendix 8 - iManage Change Management Standards  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Appendix 8 iManage Change Management Standards Department of Energy Deliverable ID: PM1001 Version number: 1.0 Draft/Final as of: 7/23/2012 Printed on: 27 Jul 2012 Author: Michael Preis Michael.Preis@hq.doe.gov (301)903-3812 Owner: Lajos Grof-Tisza, iManage Program Manager Status of Document Draft Delivered Accepted Program Name: Department of Energy iManage Program Project ID: iManage Configuration Management Plan Program Mgr: Lajos Grof-Tisza Doc ID: PM1001 Draft ii Document information Document source This document is maintained as an online document. Contact the author for the latest version. Revision history Version number Date Summary of changes Revised By 1.00 26 Feb 2007 Initial Version Michael Preis Approvals

4

PRELIMINARY SELECTION OF MGR DESIGN BASIS EVENTS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this analysis is to identify the preliminary design basis events (DBEs) for consideration in the design of the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR). For external events and natural phenomena (e.g., earthquake), the objective is to identify those initiating events that the MGR will be designed to withstand. Design criteria will ensure that radiological release scenarios resulting from these initiating events are beyond design basis (i.e., have a scenario frequency less than once per million years). For internal (i.e., human-induced and random equipment failures) events, the objective is to identify credible event sequences that result in bounding radiological releases. These sequences will be used to establish the design basis criteria for MGR structures, systems, and components (SSCs) design basis criteria in order to prevent or mitigate radiological releases. The safety strategy presented in this analysis for preventing or mitigating DBEs is based on the preclosure safety strategy outlined in ''Strategy to Mitigate Preclosure Offsite Exposure'' (CRWMS M&O 1998f). DBE analysis is necessary to provide feedback and requirements to the design process, and also to demonstrate compliance with proposed 10 CFR 63 (Dyer 1999b) requirements. DBE analysis is also required to identify and classify the SSCs that are important to safety (ITS).

J.A. Kappes

1999-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

5

CLASSIFICATION OF THE MGR SURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this analysis is to document the Quality Assurance (QA) classification of the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) surface environmental monitoring system structures, systems and components (SSCs) performed by the MGR Safety Assurance Department. This analysis also provides the basis for revision of YMP/90-55Q, Q-List (YMP 1998). The Q-List identifies those MGR SSCs subject to the requirements of DOE/RW-0333PY ''Quality Assurance Requirements and Description'' (QARD) (DOE 1998).

J.A. Ziegler

1999-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

6

CLASSIFICATION OF THE MGR SUBSURFACE DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this analysis is to document the Quality Assurance (QA) classification of the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) subsurface development transportation structures, systems and components (SSCs) performed by the MGR Safety Assurance Department. This analysis also provides the basis for revision of YMP/90-55Q, Q-List (YMP 1998). The Q-List identifies those MGR SSCs subject to the requirements of DOE/RW-0333P7 ''Quality Assurance Requirements and Description'' (QARD) (DOE 1998).

R. Garrett

1999-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

7

CFO.pdf  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Financial Officer Financial Officer Vacant CF-1 Deputy Chief Financial Officer Alison Doone Asst. Deputy Chief Financial Officer Penny Mefford CF-2 Office of the Chief Financial Officer October 2013 Office of Finance and Accounting Joanne Choi, Director CF-10 Office of Budget Christopher Johns, Director CF-30 Office of Corporate Information Systems Lajos Grof-Tisza, Director CF-40 Office of Financial Risk, Policy & Controls April Stephenson, Director CF-50 Energy Finance and Accounting Service Center Jared Martin, Director CF-11 Office of Financial Control and Reporting Vacant, Director CF-12 Office of Finance and Accounting October 2013 Office of Finance and Accounting Joanne Choi, Director CF-10 Office of Budget Christopher Johns Director CF-30 Budget Analysis Deputy Director CF-31 Budget Operations

8

CLASSIFICATION OF THE MGR WASTE EMPLACEMENT/RETRIEVAL SYSTEM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this analysis is to document the Quality Assurance (QA) classification of the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) waste emplacement/retrieved system structures, systems and components (SSCs) performed by the MGR Preclosure Safety and Systems Engineering Section. This analysis also provides the basis for revision of YMP/90-55Q, Q-List (YMP 2000). The Q-List identifies those MGR SSCs subject to the requirements of DOE/RW-0333P, Quality Assurance Requirements and Description (QARD) (DOE 2000). This QA classification incorporates the current MGR design and the results of the ''Design Basis Event Frequency and Dose Calculation for Site Recommendation'' (CRWMS M&O 2000a). The content and technical approach of this analysis is in accordance with the development plan ''QA Classification of MGR Structures, Systems, and Components'' (CRWMS M&O 1999b).

J.A. Ziegler

2000-11-08T23:59:59.000Z

9

Architektura GIS z pohledu tok dat Mgr. Toms Skopal  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Architektura GIS z pohledu tok dat Mgr. Tomás Skopal Katedra informatiky, FEI VSB ­ Technická This article introduces original model of open software architecture for GIS, which should hit the intent ­ accelerate and improve GIS applications design. First part deals with the solution motivation, second part

Skopal, Tomas

10

Air-Breathing Laminar Flow-Based Microfluidic Fuel Cell Ranga S. Jayashree, Lajos Gancs, Eric R. Choban,, Alex Primak, Dilip Natarajan,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Air-Breathing Laminar Flow-Based Microfluidic Fuel Cell Ranga S. Jayashree, Lajos Gancs, Eric R-based microfluidic fuel cell. Micro fuel cells have long been recognized as promising high energy density power,5 and microfluidic cells.6 Recent efforts have shown that the microfluidic transport phenomenon of laminar flow can

Kenis, Paul J. A.

11

Algorithms for the substrate of MGR Roger T. Hartley  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in `set pseudocode'. Since all of the algorithms are manipulations on sets and functions, the basic set with no real algorithm 1 #12;DEFINITIONSMODELSFACTS FRAGMENT SPECIALIZE choose project uncover choose cover. It does this by covering each concept in the set of fact graphs by at least one definition (see Figure 3

Hartley, Roger

12

Leo Sain President & Proj Mgr UCOR July 10 2012 SB Summit  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safely Delivering the Department of Energy's Vision Safely Delivering the Department of Energy's Vision for the East Tennessee Technology Park Mission Small Business Overview Leo Sain, President and Project Manager July 10, 2012 Safely Delivering DOE's Vision for the East Tennessee Technology Park Mission UCOR Overview * UCOR is DOE's Environmental Management contractor for cleanup work on the Oak Ridge Reservation. * Our major project is demolition of the K-25 Building (to be completed in the summer of 2014). * Contract Information - Size - $2.3 Billion - Partners: URS Energy & Construction, Inc. (primary) and CH2M HILL Constructors, Inc. - Contract duration  August 1, 2011, through July 31, 2016  4 Option Contract Line Items that could extend contract to July 31, 2020 K-25 Demolition Safely Delivering DOE's Vision for the

13

Code Coverage-Based Regression Test Selection and Prioritization in WebKit rpd Beszdes, Tams Gergely, Lajos Schrettner, Judit Jsz, Lszl Lang, Tibor Gyimthy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. Although the possible benefits are clear, a practical implementation and sustained reliability evolving software system. However, in many cases regression test suites tend to grow too large to be suitable for full re-execution at each change of the software. In this case selective retesting can

Beszedes, Árpád

14

Biomechanics of common carotid arteries from mice heterozygous for mgR, the most common mouse model of Marfan syndrome  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Marfan syndrome, affecting approximately one out of every 5,000 people, is characterized by abnormal bone growth, ectopia lentis, and often-fatal aortic dilation and dissection. The root cause is a faulty extracellular matrix protein, fibrillin-1...

Taucer, Anne Irene

2009-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

15

Vice Provost's Office Peter M. Siegel  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Paul Verwey Media Svcs Mgr · Graphic design · Video/audio · Animations (2D/3D) · Webcasts · Digital Tim Leamy Lab mgr · Computer classrooms · Open access labs · Printing Charlie Turner App Dev Sup

California at Davis, University of

16

GSA News & Information  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Oil & Gas Co, 57-63, mgr. explor, 63-65; GEN. MGR, LUBELL OIL CO, 65- Instr, Denver exten, Univ. Colo, 48. U...Sedimentary petrography; petroleum geology. Address: Lubell Oil Company, 1033 Mayo Building, Tulsa, OK 74103. PHONE...

17

International Workshop on Recent Advances in Mathematical Statistics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) · Siegfried H¨ormann (Universit´e libre de Bruxelles) · Lajos Horv´ath (University of Utah, Salt Lake City University in Prague) · Gregory Rice (University of Utah, Salt Lake City) · Pranab K. Sen (University of the Charles University in Prague has the pleasure to invite you to participate in the Workshop organized

Cerveny, Vlastislav

18

Emergency Operations Training Academy | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Introduction Monitoring Division Mgr Training, Adv NARAC Dispersion Modeling NARAC Web Operations Overview of Consequence Management Overview of the DOENNSA Emergency...

19

Document: NA Document Date: 12/12/20 11 Actionee: Dorothy Riehie  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST DIR DIV NAME DIR DIV NAME MGR AMMS DEP AMMS ISI AMA AMMS PLC AMA FMD AMMS SES AMA HRM AMMS SSD AMA PRO AMRC AMCP AMSE AMSE EMD AMSE OOD AMSE SED 0CC...

20

Scott Koenig Development Officer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Scott Koenig Development Officer Teri Lucie Thompson Senior Vice President & CMO UA FOUNDAT I/TV Station Mgr Frank Fregoso Chief Engineer Cheech Calenti IT Manager Ed Kesterson Radio Program Dir. AHSC

Utzinger, Urs

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "mgr lajos grof-tisza" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Microsoft Word - Other Template.docx  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Telephone: 702-295-0077 DOE 2005a DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2005a, Site Environmental Report for the Yucca Mountain Project Calendar Year 2004, PGM-MGR-EC-000006, Rev....

22

Microsoft Word - Other Template.docx  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Telephone: 702-295-0077 DOE 2004b DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), 2004b, Site Environmental Report for the Yucca Mountain Project Calendar Year 2003, PGM-MGR-EC-000005 REV...

23

SJT O)p Document: NA Actionee: Dorothy Riehle * Document Date...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Date: NO ACTION Author: WEST A Addressee: RIEHLE D TA2ES 01 Title: FOIA Request - Contracting Officers DIR DIV NAME DIR DIV NAME MGR AMRC DEP AMSE AMA EMD FMD OOD HRM SED PRO...

24

BPA-2012-003364-FOIA Request  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Dec.2011 Memo To:W.C.Madsen,Wildlife Mgr.BPA Subject:Freedom of Information Act Request(FOIA) From:Rob Kavanaugh Lt42' Thanks for your response and letter dated Oct.31.2011 ref the...

25

Microsoft Word - NSDBs for LA REV 003 FINAL.doc  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

QA: QA 000-30R-MGR0-00400-000-003 September 2005 Nuclear Safety Design Bases for License Application Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste...

26

RESPONSE TRACKING INFORMATION BEH W.Wagner BPM M. Redmon BPM  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

RESPONSE RESPONSE TRACKING INFORMATION BEH W.Wagner BPM M. Redmon BPM . Palau BPM P. Huber BPM S. Priest BPM BCR BFC ENVIR TECH/DATA BET ENGINEERING BET GEOTE~ BET DEPUTY PROGRAM MGR.: P. Crotwell BPM PROGRAM MANAGER: R. Harbert BPM PROJECT MANAGER: COMMUNITY RELATIONS CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY BET ENVIRON SAFETY & HEALTH F~~-~~~~-~-~---+-r~-~ W/A W/O K. Renfro SAIC J. Waddell SAIC S. Heptinstall SAIC DEPUTY PROGRAM MGR: T. Patlerson SAIC PROGRAM MANAGER: MGMT. SYSTEMS: SECRETARY: AFFECTED DOCUMENT _ ""')::~ 119033 ,..,::.().: CCN: ..t.:;,;;..:.=..:..:..;:.,.;;.;.:.;~;.;:....c",-,-~~~~ lli::JSRAP COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION FSRD C¥J COMM TYPE ,-,,-1e<~..::........L---J DOE/ORO FORMER SITES RESTORATION

27

MONITORED GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY LIFE CYCLE COST ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this assumptions document is to provide general scope, strategy, technical basis, schedule and cost assumptions for the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) life cycle cost (LCC) estimate and schedule update incorporating information from the Viability Assessment (VA) , License Application Design Selection (LADS), 1999 Update to the Total System Life Cycle Cost (TSLCC) estimate and from other related and updated information. This document is intended to generally follow the assumptions outlined in the previous MGR cost estimates and as further prescribed by DOE guidance.

R.E. Sweeney

2001-02-08T23:59:59.000Z

28

RESEARCH ENTERPRISE SERVICES (RES) Services at a Glance Last Updated September 6, 2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

@berkeley.edu Nick Endsley, Grants Manager, 642-6884, nendsley@berkeley.edu Latara Harris, Compliance Mgr., 643 actions (new appointments, reappointments, merits, promotions, reviews, separations) for staff and non-senate academics · Recruitment and hiring coordination · Visa processing and counseling · Performance and merit

Mofrad, Mohammad R. K.

29

RESEARCH ACCELERATOR DIVISION K. JONES, DIVISION DIRECTOR  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FINANCE J. GOODPASTURE ES&H OFFICER/DRCO M. CARPENTER QUALITY ASSURANCEL. AARON FINANCE J. GREEN (4 Distribution K. NORRIS LEAD ENGINEER LEAD ENGINEER R. SAETHRE ENGINEER T. CARTY DESIGNERD. HALL DESIGNER Power Conversion J. MIZE ENGINEER K. RUST LEAD ENGINEER Electrical Shop W. BARNETT ELEC SYS SHOP MGR S. FISHER

30

Office: ITO PE/Project  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Projection wall interspersed with low-cost, unobtrusive cameras Seeing PeopleHearing People Concept - Light1 DARPA Office: ITO PE/Project: Pgm No.: Pgm Mgr.: Mills/Swinson PAD No.: Smart Spaces Personal Information Projection · Develop techniques for projecting personal information from cyberspace into smart

Mills, Kevin

31

Audience/Panel Discussion: Sites Lesson Learned about Activity-level Work Planning and Control Using EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guideline  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Slide Presentation by Donna J. Governor, Deputy Dept Mgr for Planning & Integration, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory work planning and control lessons learned and audience/panel discussion on site's lessons learned about Activity-level Work Planning and Control using EFCOG Work Planning and Control Guideline Document.

32

An Architecture for Problem Solving in Unstructured Environments C. A. Fields, M. J. Coombs, and R. T. Hartley  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

by considering the software engineering problems posed by unstructured environments, and the assumptions). In an unstructured environment, however, the knowledge engineer may be unable to predict either the rangeMGR: An Architecture for Problem Solving in Unstructured Environments C. A. Fields, M. J. Coombs

Hartley, Roger

33

CSc-165 Spring 2014 Week 5 (c) Events (updated for SAGE v.620)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Pyramid aPyr; Teapot teap; int numCrashes = 0; protected void initGame() { eventMgr = EventGameWorldObject(aPyr); teap = new Teapot(); Matrix3D teaM = teap.getLocalTranslation(); teaM.translate(1,1,-5); teap

Gordon, Scott

34

CSc-165 Spring 2014 Week 3 (a) Events / Camera Control / Collision Handling  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Pyramid aPyr; Teapot teap; int numCrashes = 0; protected void initGame() { eventMgr = EventPyr.getLocalTranslation(); pyrM.translate(2,0,-12); aPyr.setLocalTranslation(pyrM); addGameWorldObject(aPyr); teap = new Teapot

Gordon, Scott

35

2010 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SR  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OOEF Jl2$U OOEF Jl2$U United States Government Department of Energy (DOE) memorandum Savannah River Operations Office (SR) DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: JAN 2 6 2011 MGR (Moody/(803) 952-9468) Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2010- 10-NA SC-09 TO: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel The Calendar Year 2010 DOE-SR Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report is attached. This analysis was conducted in conjunction with the development of the DOE-SR 5-Year Workforce Management Plan. If you have any questions, please contact me or have your staff contact Mr. Edgar Gates at 803-952-9227 or Mr. Lee Moody at 803-952-5978. MGR:LHM:bcp OHCM-11-1053 Attachment: DOE-SR Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report

36

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SR  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

lllS.81 lllS.81 United States Government Department of Energy (DOE\ memorandum Savannah River Operations Office (SR) DATE: REPLY TO ATINOF: FEB 132811: MGR (Moody/(803) 952-9468) SUBJECT: Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012 To: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel The Calendar Year 2012 DOE-SR Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report is attached. This analysis was conducted in conjunction with the development of the DOE-SR 5-Y ear Workforce Management Plan. If you have any questions, please contact me or have your staff contact Mr. Edgar Gates at 803-952-9227 or Mrs. Deanna Yates at 803-952-6925. MGR:EG:lec OHCM-13-0025 Attachment: DOE-SR Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report

37

2011 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - SR  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

# # United States Government Department of Energy (DOE) memorandum Savannah River Operations Office (SR) DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: JAN 2 O 2012 MGR (Moody/(803) 952-9468) Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2011 - 10-NA SC-09 TO: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel The Calendar Year 2011 DOE-SR Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report is attached. This analysis was conducted in conjunction with the development of the DOE-SR 5-Year Workforce Management Plan. If you have any questions, please contact me or have your staff contact Mr. Edgar Gates at 803-952-9227 or Mr. Lee Moody at 803-952-5978. MGR:EG:bcp OHCM-12-1035 Attachment: DOE-SR Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report

38

INDUSTRIAL/MILITARY ACTIVITY-INITIATED ACCIDENT SCREENING ANALYSIS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Impacts due to nearby installations and operations were determined in the Preliminary MGDS Hazards Analysis (CRWMS M&O 1996) to be potentially applicable to the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain. This determination was conservatively based on limited knowledge of the potential activities ongoing on or off the Nevada Test Site (NTS). It is intended that the Industrial/Military Activity-Initiated Accident Screening Analysis provided herein will meet the requirements of the ''Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants'' (NRC 1987) in establishing whether this external event can be screened from further consideration or must be included as a design basis event (DBE) in the development of accident scenarios for the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR). This analysis only considers issues related to preclosure radiological safety. Issues important to waste isolation as related to impact from nearby installations will be covered in the MGR performance assessment.

D.A. Kalinich

1999-09-27T23:59:59.000Z

39

Intact and Degraded Component Criticality Calculations of N Reactors Spent Nuclear Fuel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of this calculation is to perform intact and degraded mode criticality evaluations of the Department of Energy's (DOE) N Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel codisposed in a 2-Defense High-Level Waste (2-DHLW)/2-Multi-Canister Overpack (MCO) Waste Package (WP) and emplaced in a monitored geologic repository (MGR) (see Attachment I). The scope of this calculation is limited to the determination of the effective neutron multiplication factor (k{sub eff}) for both intact and degraded mode internal configurations of the codisposal waste package. This calculation will support the analysis that will be performed to demonstrate the technical viability for disposing of U-metal (N Reactor) spent nuclear fuel in the potential MGR.

L. Angers

2001-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

40

Driving Energy Performance with Energy Management Teams  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Driving Energy Performance with Energy Management Teams Meredith Younghein ENERGY STAR Industrial Communications Mgr. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC ABSTRACT Companies today face an uncertain energy future. Businesses... face escalating energy prices which can erode profits. Concerns over supply reliability, and possible regulation of carbon emissions create risk. For many industries in the U.S., energy costs are equal to the cost of raw materials or even employee...

Younghein, M.; Tunnessen, W.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "mgr lajos grof-tisza" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Light-Emitting Tag Testing in Conjunction with Testing of the Minimum Gap Runner Turbine Design at Bonneville Dam Powerhouse 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes a pilot study conducted by Tom Carlson of PNNL and Mark Weiland of MEVATEC Corp to test the feasibility of using light-emitting tags to visually track objects passing through the turbine environment of a hydroelectric dam. Light sticks were released at the blade tip, mid-blade, and hub in the MGR turbine and a Kaplan turbine at Bonneville Dam and videotaped passing thru the dam to determine visibility and object trajectories.

Carlson, Thomas J.; Weiland, Mark A.

2001-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

42

Monitored Geologic Repository Project Description Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary objective of the Monitored Geologic Repository Project Description Document (PDD) is to allocate the functions, requirements, and assumptions to the systems at Level 5 of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) architecture identified in Section 4. It provides traceability of the requirements to those contained in Section 3 of the ''Monitored Geologic Repository Requirements Document'' (MGR RD) (CRWMS M&O 2000b) and other higher-level requirements documents. In addition, the PDD allocates design related assumptions to work products of non-design organizations. The document provides Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) engineering design basis in support of design and performance assessment in preparing for the Site Recommendation (SR) and License Application (LA) milestones. The engineering design basis documented in the PDD is to be captured in the System Description Documents (SDDs) which address each of the systems at Level 5 of the CRWMS architecture. The design engineers obtain the engineering design basis from the SDDs and by reference from the SDDs to the PDD. The design organizations and other organizations will obtain design related assumptions directly from the PDD. These organizations may establish additional assumptions for their individual activities, but such assumptions are not to conflict with the assumptions in the PDD. The PDD will serve as the primary link between the engineering design basis captured in the SDDs and the design requirements captured in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) documents. The approved PDD is placed under Level 3 baseline control by the CRWMS Management and Operating Contractor (M&O) and the following portions of the PDD constitute the Technical Design Baseline for the MGR: the design characteristics listed in Table 2-1, the MGR Architecture (Section 4.1),the Engineering Design Bases (Section 5), and the Controlled Project Assumptions (Section 6).

P. Curry

2000-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

43

Monitored Geologic Repository Project Description Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary objective of the Monitored Geologic Repository Project Description Document (PDD) is to allocate the functions, requirements, and assumptions to the systems at Level 5 of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) architecture identified in Section 4. It provides traceability of the requirements to those contained in Section 3 of the ''Monitored Geologic Repository Requirements Document'' (MGR RD) (YMP 2000a) and other higher-level requirements documents. In addition, the PDD allocates design related assumptions to work products of non-design organizations. The document provides Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) technical requirements in support of design and performance assessment in preparing for the Site Recommendation (SR) and License Application (LA) milestones. The technical requirements documented in the PDD are to be captured in the System Description Documents (SDDs) which address each of the systems at Level 5 of the CRWMS architecture. The design engineers obtain the technical requirements from the SDDs and by reference from the SDDs to the PDD. The design organizations and other organizations will obtain design related assumptions directly from the PDD. These organizations may establish additional assumptions for their individual activities, but such assumptions are not to conflict with the assumptions in the PDD. The PDD will serve as the primary link between the technical requirements captured in the SDDs and the design requirements captured in US Department of Energy (DOE) documents. The approved PDD is placed under Level 3 baseline control by the CRWMS Management and Operating Contractor (M and O) and the following portions of the PDD constitute the Technical Design Baseline for the MGR: the design characteristics listed in Table 1-1, the MGR Architecture (Section 4.1), the Technical Requirements (Section 5), and the Controlled Project Assumptions (Section 6).

P. M. Curry

2001-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

44

COMMERCIAL SNF ACCIDENT RELEASE FRACTIONS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this design analysis is to specify and document the total and respirable fractions for radioactive materials that are released from an accident event at the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) involving commercial spent nuclear fuel (CSNF) in a dry environment. The total and respirable release fractions will be used to support the preclosure licensing basis for the MGR. The total release fraction is defined as the fraction of total CSNF assembly inventory, typically expressed as an activity inventory (e.g., curies), of a given radionuclide that is released to the environment from a waste form. The radionuclides are released from the inside of breached fuel rods (or pins) and from the detachment of radioactive material (crud) from the outside surfaces of fuel rods and other components of fuel assemblies. The total release fraction accounts for several mechanisms that tend to retain, retard, or diminish the amount of radionuclides that are available for transport to dose receptors or otherwise can be shown to reduce exposure of receptors to radiological releases. The total release fraction includes a fraction of airborne material that is respirable and could result in inhalation doses. This subset of the total release fraction is referred to as the respirable release fraction. Potential accidents may involve waste forms that are characterized as either bare (unconfined) fuel assemblies or confined fuel assemblies. The confined CSNF assemblies at the MGR are contained in shipping casks, canisters, or disposal containers (waste packages). In contrast to the bare fuel assemblies, the container that confines the fuel assemblies has the potential of providing an additional barrier for diminishing the total release fraction should the fuel rod cladding breach during an accident. However, this analysis will not take credit for this additional bamer and will establish only the total release fractions for bare unconfined CSNF assemblies, which may however be conservatively applied to confined CSNF assemblies.

S.O. Bader

1999-10-18T23:59:59.000Z

45

Monitored Geologic Repository Project Description Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary objective of the Monitored Geologic Repository Project Description Document (PDD) is to allocate the functions, requirements, and assumptions to the systems at Level 5 of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) architecture identified in Section 4. It provides traceability of the requirements to those contained in Section 3 of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project Requirements Document (YMP RD) (YMP 2001a) and other higher-level requirements documents. In addition, the PDD allocates design related assumptions to work products of non-design organizations. The document provides Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) technical requirements in support of design and performance assessment in preparing for the Site Recommendation (SR) and License Application (LA) milestones. The technical requirements documented in the PDD are to be captured in the System Description Documents (SDDs) which address each of the systems at Level 5 of the CRWMS architecture. The design engineers obtain the technical requirements from the SDDs and by reference from the SDDs to the PDD. The design organizations and other organizations will obtain design related assumptions directly from the PDD. These organizations may establish additional assumptions for their individual activities, but such assumptions are not to conflict with the assumptions in the PDD. The PDD will serve as the primary link between the technical requirements captured in the SDDs and the design requirements captured in US Department of Energy (DOE) documents. The approved PDD is placed under Level 3 baseline control by the CRWMS Management and Operating Contractor (M&O) and the following portions of the PDD constitute the Technical Design Baseline for the MGR: the design characteristics listed in Table 1-1, the MGR Architecture (Section 4.1), the Technical Requirements (Section 5), and the Controlled Project Assumptions (Section 6).

P. Curry

2001-06-26T23:59:59.000Z

46

SWP.phase3factsheet0919  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Deep Saline Deployment Project 1 Deep Saline Deployment Project 1 FACTSHEET FOR SOUTHWEST PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail William O'Dowd NETL William.ODowd@NETL.DOE.GOV 1-412-386-4778 Principal Investigator Reid Grigg/Brian McPherson NMT reid@prrc.nmt.edu / brian@nmt.edu Field Test Information: Field Test Name Southwest Deep Saline Sequestration Test Location Farnham Dome near Price, Utah Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons Source

47

Microsoft Word - Cropland P2.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7.0 Cropland Field Validation Test 1 7.0 Cropland Field Validation Test 1 FACTSHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail David Lang NETL Lang@netl.doe.gov Principal Investigator Lee Spangler Field Test Information: Field Test Name Cropland Field Validation (+ remote sensing work) Test Location North central Montana Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons Source: atmosphere Field Test Partners (Primary Sponsors) Washington State University, Montana State University, Los Alamos National Lab Summary of Field Test Site and Operations:

48

Microsoft PowerPoint - EastBend_NETL Meeting_Nov 18_ 2009 MK_rev2.ppt  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

II CO II CO 2 Sequestration Test Cincinnati Arch MRCSP Site for: Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Annual Review November 16-19, 2009 by: Mark E. Kelley, P.G. (Battelle) 2 Acknowledgements - Traci Rodosta, DOE/NETL Program Mgr - Darlene Radcliffe, Duke Energy, Director, Environmental Technology & Fuel Policy - Brian Weisker, Plant Manger for Duke Energy East Bend Station - Joe Clark, Technical Manager, Duke Energy East Bend Station - Kentucky Geological Survey (Steve Greb and others) - Indiana Geological Survey (John Rupp and others) - Ohio Geological Survey (Larry Wickstrom and others) - Bill Rike Consulting Geologist - Sarah Wade, AJW Incorporated - Battelle Staff - Dave Ball (Program Manager), Neeraj Gupta (Technical Advisor), Matt Place (Field Lead), Linc Remmert,

49

SWP.terrestrial.factsheet0919  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FACTSHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST FACTSHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail William O'Dowd NETL William.odowd@netl.doe.gov Principal Investigator Reid Grigg / Brian McPherson NMT reid@prrc.nmt.edu / brian@nmt.edu Field Test Information: Field Test Name Terrestrial Sequestration Programs - Regional Terrestrial and Local Terrestrial Sequestration (Combined With Enhanced Coalbed Methane Sequestration) Test Location Entire Region (Regional Program); San Juan Basin (Local Pilot Test) Amount and Source of CO 2

50

Microsoft Word - Basalt Pilot Phase II Fact Sheet FY08  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

16.0 Basalt Pilot 1 16.0 Basalt Pilot 1 FACTSHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Big Sky Regional Carbon Partnership Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail David Lang NETL LANG@netl.doe.gov Principal Investigator Lee Spangler Field Test Information: Basalt Sequestration Pilot Test Test Location Near Wallula township in Eastern Washington State Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons Source 3000 Refinery Field Test Partners (Primary Sponsors) Pacific Northwest National Lab - Pacific Northwest Division, Idaho

51

2006  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Enhanced Coalbed Methane Test 1 Enhanced Coalbed Methane Test 1 FACTSHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail John Litynski NETL John.Litynski@netl.doe.gov Principal Investigator Robert J. Finley Illinois State Geological Survey finley@isgs.uiuc.edu Field Test Information: Field Test Name Task 7: Enhanced Coalbed Methane Test Location NE NW Sec.27, T1S, R14W, western Wabash County, IL Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons Source 750 (budgeted) Air Liquide (refinery or ethanol plant)

52

A study of sterility in certain Gossypium hybrids  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

a i i s f or smxxjTT n cnun ckmsifxum umim A MMMrtafclMi iik irt Jmkia i OahM. jy. )fcj?r MJivfei a? itlaa Aipfwil M to ity&? ~ Mgr, 1952 a a??? or s t to u ty a d r a m oattxvxat mcnxM ?sr... of ow eod ig s te r ility b a r r ie r s .......................... . . . . kk ??????? AMD MBTH0D8................................... 1(6 Cooqpariaan of jollm behavior......... ................ ?? Comparison of fertilisin g ab ilities...

Oakes, Albert Jackson

1952-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

General and Localized Corrosion of Borated Stainless Steels  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Transportation, Aging and Disposal (TAD) canister-based system is being proposed to transport and store spent nuclear fuel at the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) located at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The preliminary design of this system identifies borated stainless steel as the neutron absorber material that will be used to fabricate fuel basket inserts for nuclear criticality control. This paper discusses corrosion test results for verifying the performance of this material manufactured to the requirements of ASTM A887, Grade A, under the expected repository conditions.

T.E. Lister; Ronald E. Mizia; A.W. Erickson; T.L. Trowbridge; B. S. Matteson

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

BSCSP Basalt Pilot Phase II Factsheet 2009  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Basalt Sequestration Pilot Test 1 Basalt Sequestration Pilot Test 1 FACTSHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Big Sky Regional Carbon Partnership Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail William Aljoe NETL William.Aljoe@netl.doe.gov Principal Investigator Lee Spangler Field Test Information: Field Test Name Basalt Sequestration Pilot Test Test Location Near Wallula township in Eastern Washington State Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons Source 1000 Refinery Field Test Partners (Primary Sponsors) Boise White Paper L.L.C., Shell Exploration and Production Company, Port of Walla Walla,

55

Microsoft Word - BB-Terrestrial.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PCOR Terrestrial Field Validation Test PCOR Terrestrial Field Validation Test 1 FACT SHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Plains CO 2 Reduction (PCOR) Partnership - Phase II Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail Darin Damiani, U.S. Department of Energy, Darin.Damiani@netl.doe.gov Principal Investigator Edward Steadman Field Test Information: Field Test Name PCOR Terrestrial Field Validation Test Test Location North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Montana, Iowa Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons N/A Source Atmospheric CO 2 Ducks Unlimited, Inc. U.S. Geological Survey Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Field Test Partners (Primary Sponsors) North Dakota State University

56

Ram Pressure Stripping in Groups: Comparing Theory and Observations  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Ram pressure stripping may be the dominant mechanisms driving the evolution of galaxy colors in groups and clusters. In this paper, an analytic model of ram pressure stripping is confronted with observations of galaxy colors and star formation rates in groups using a group catalog drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. An observed increase in the fraction of galaxies residing on the red sequence, the red fraction, with both increasing group mass, $M_{gr}$, and decreasing satellite luminosity, $L_{sat}$, is predicted by the model. The size of the differences in the red fraction can be understood in terms of the effect of the scatter in satellite and cluster morphologies and satellite orbits on the relationship between $M_{gr}$ and $L_{sat}$ and the stripped gas fraction. Observations of the group galaxies' H$\\delta$ and 4000\\AA break spectral measures and a comparison of the distribution of $SFR/M_{\\ast}$ for star forming galaxies in the groups and in isolation both indicate that the color differences observed in the groups are the result of slowly declining SFRs, as expected if the color change is driven by stripping of the outer H \\textsc{i} disk.

J. A. Hester

2006-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

57

MONITORED GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document establishes the Monitored Geologic Repository system requirements for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS). These requirements are based on the ''Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document'' (CRD) (DOE 2004a). The ''Monitored Geologic Repository Systems Requirements Document'' (MGR-RD) is developed in accordance with LP-3.3 SQ-OCRWM, ''Preparation, Review, and Approval of Office of Repository Development Requirements Document''. As illustrated in Figure 1, the MGR-RD forms part of the DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Technical Requirements Baseline. Revision 0 of this document identifies requirements for the current phase of repository design that is focused on developing a preliminary design for the repository and will be included in the license application submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a repository at Yucca Mountain in support of receiving a construction authorization and subsequent operating license. As additional information becomes available, more detailed requirements will be identified in subsequent revisions to this document.

V. Trebules

2006-06-02T23:59:59.000Z

58

Modeling for Airborne Contamination  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of Modeling for Airborne Contamination (referred to from now on as ''this report'') is to provide a documented methodology, along with supporting information, for estimating the release, transport, and assessment of dose to workers from airborne radioactive contaminants within the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) subsurface during the pre-closure period. Specifically, this report provides engineers and scientists with methodologies for estimating how concentrations of contaminants might be distributed in the air and on the drift surfaces if released from waste packages inside the repository. This report also provides dose conversion factors for inhalation, air submersion, and ground exposure pathways used to derive doses to potentially exposed subsurface workers. The scope of this report is limited to radiological contaminants (particulate, volatile and gaseous) resulting from waste package leaks (if any) and surface contamination and their transport processes. Neutron activation of air, dust in the air and the rock walls of the drift during the preclosure time is not considered within the scope of this report. Any neutrons causing such activation are not themselves considered to be ''contaminants'' released from the waste package. This report: (1) Documents mathematical models and model parameters for evaluating airborne contaminant transport within the MGR subsurface; and (2) Provides tables of dose conversion factors for inhalation, air submersion, and ground exposure pathways for important radionuclides. The dose conversion factors for air submersion and ground exposure pathways are further limited to drift diameters of 7.62 m and 5.5 m, corresponding to the main and emplacement drifts, respectively. If the final repository design significantly deviates from these drift dimensions, the results in this report may require revision. The dose conversion factors are further derived by using concrete of sufficient thickness to simulate the drift walls. The gamma-ray scattering properties of concrete are sufficiently similar to those of the host rock and proposed insert material; use of concrete will have no significant impact on the conclusions. The information in this report is presented primarily for use in performing pre-closure radiological safety evaluations of radiological contaminants, but it may also be used to develop strategies for contaminant leak detection and monitoring in the MGR. Included in this report are the methods for determining the source terms and release fractions, and mathematical models and model parameters for contaminant transport and distribution within the repository. Various particle behavior mechanisms that affect the transport of contaminant are included. These particle behavior mechanisms include diffusion, settling, resuspension, agglomeration and other deposition mechanisms.

F.R. Faillace; Y. Yuan

2000-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

59

Qualifying Officials Designation Letter - Savannah River Operations Office  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOEP IUUI DOEP IUUI United States Government Department of Energy (DOE) memorandum Savannah River Operations Office (SR) DATE: REPLY TO ATTN OF: SUBJECT: NOV 3 o 2010 MGR (Moody, 2-9468) Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Qualifying Officials (QO) ro: DISTRIBUTION Each employee whose name appears on the attached listings is designated as a TQP QO. You were chosen by your supervisor because you have demonstrated an in-depth level of knowledge and abilities in the functional area or functional competency for which you are designated. As a designated TQP QO, you play a significant role in the qualification process of TQP participants and have a grave responsibility for maintaining the intent and integrity of the program. Your signature on the qualification record validates the

60

Notices  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 Federal Register 4 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2011 / Notices mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or mailed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202-4537. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public records. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) requires that Federal agencies provide interested parties an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. The Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection requests at the beginning of the Departmental review of the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "mgr lajos grof-tisza" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Notices  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 Federal Register 1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 102 / Friday, May 25, 2012 / Notices be addressed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202-4537. Requests may also be electronically mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202-401-0920. Please specify the complete title of the information collection and OMB Control Number when making your request. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877- 8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that Federal agencies provide interested parties an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. The Director, Information Collection

62

Microsoft Word - BB-Terrestrial-Oct09  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Terrestrial Field Validation Test Terrestrial Field Validation Test 1 FACT SHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Plains CO 2 Reduction (PCOR) Partnership - Phase II Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail Andrea McNemar, U.S. Department of Energy, andrea.mcnemar@netl.doe.gov Principal Investigator Edward Steadman Field Test Information: Field Test Name Terrestrial Field Validation Test Test Location North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Montana, Iowa Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons N/A Source Atmospheric CO 2 Field Test Partners (Primary Sponsors) Ducks Unlimited, Inc. U.S. Geological Survey Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center North Dakota State University Summary of Field Test Site and Operations:

63

Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program (DOE/EIS-0353) (05/12/06)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

714 Federal Register 714 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Notices 6623. Please specify the complete title of the information collection when making your request. Comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity requirements should be electronically mailed to IC DocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1- 800-877-8339. [FR Doc. E6-7288 Filed 5-11-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services; Special Education-Technology and Media Services for Individuals With Disabilities-Access to Emerging Technologies (CFDA No. 84.327C) ACTION: Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2006;

64

EIS-0437-NoticeofCancellation-2012.pdf  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

320 Federal Register 320 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 29, 2012 / Notices DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before October 29, 2012. ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity requirements should be electronically mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or mailed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202-4537. Copies of the proposed information collection request may be accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the ''Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number 04922. When you access the information collection, click on ''Download Attachments'' to view. Written requests for information should be addressed to U.S. Department of

65

Microsoft Word - JAS-WillistonBasin-Oct09  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EOR Field Test EOR Field Test 1 FACT SHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Plains CO 2 Reduction (PCOR) Partnership - Phase II Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail Andrea McNemar, U.S. Department of Energy, andrea.mcnemar@netl.doe.gov Principal Investigator Edward Steadman Field Test Information: Field Test Name Williston Basin EOR Field Test Test Location Northwest McGregor Oil Field, Williams County, North Dakota Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons 440 tons Source Commercial vendor Field Test Partners (Primary Sponsors) Eagle Operating, Inc. Schlumberger Carbon Services Praxair Summary of Field Test Site and Operations: The Plains CO 2 Reduction (PCOR) Partnership, working closely with Eagle Operating, Inc. (Eagle), has

66

Mark Palmer  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Palmer Palmer Program Mgr. & Group Leader Building & Fire Research Laboratory (BFRL) National Institute of Standards & Technology mark.palmer@nist.gov This speaker was a visiting speaker who delivered a talk or talks on the date(s) shown at the links below. This speaker is not otherwise associated with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, unless specifically identified as a Berkeley Lab staff member. Mark Palmer leads the Computer Integrated Building Processes Group at the Building and Fire Research Laboratory (BFRL) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Mr. Palmer conducts research on measurement science for the integration of information, communication and automation technologies and work process optimization to improve engineering, construction and manufacturing. P> Mr. Palmer is active in

67

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3 Federal Register 3 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2011 / Notices e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov with a cc: to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public records. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. The OMB is particularly interested in comments which: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have

68

NETL F 451.1-1/1 Categorical Exclusion (CX) Designation Form  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NETL Site Operations Division NETL Site Operations Division FE Solicitation DE-SOL0002990 Site Operations Division 2011 Bernard M. Avon Prjct Mgr/COR 6/08/2009 through 08/10/2011 NETL: Pittsburgh, PA (Building 167) Install Government-Supplied HVAC Equipment for NETL's Pittsburgh B-167 Fitness Facility Remove decommissioned HVAC system and install a government-supplied HVAC system for B-167, NETL Pittsburgh's fitness facility. See description of construction. 05 31 2011 Bernard Avon Digitally signed by Bernard Avon DN: cn=Bernard Avon, c=US, o=NETL, ou=DOE, email=bernard.avon@netl.doe.gov Date: 2010.03.22 14:07:40 -04'00' 6 4 2011 john ganz Digitally signed by john ganz DN: cn=john ganz, o=netl, ou=environmental compliance division, email=john.ganz@netl.doe.gov, c=US Date: 2011.06.04 11:12:25

69

DOE Webcast: GTI Super Boiler Technology  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Webcast Webcast GTI Super Boiler Technology by Dennis Chojnacki, Senior Engineer by Curt Bermel, Business Development Mgr. R&D > November 20, 2008 November 20, 2008 2 November 20, 2008 2 WHO WE ARE Gas Technology Institute >Leading U.S. research, development, and training organization serving the natural gas industry and energy markets ─ An independent, 501c (3) not-for-profit Serving the Energy Industry Since 1941 > Over 1,000 patents > Nearly 500 products commercialized November 20, 2008 3 November 20, 2008 3 Super Boiler Background > U.S. industrial and commercial steam boilers ─ Consume over 6 quads of natural gas per year ─ Wide range of steam uses from process steam to space heating > Installed base of steam boilers ─ Largely over 30 years old

70

Slide 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Geospatial Technologies from the Geospatial Technologies from the Ground Up: The State Perspective Department of Energy Geospatial Technology Summit August 16, 2011 NATIONAL STATES GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION COUNCIL Jon Gottsegen President, National States Geographic Information Council State GIS Coordinator/Enterprise GIS Services Mgr, State of Colorado Office of Information Technology NATIONAL STATES GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION COUNCIL What is NSGIC? (www.nsgic.org) * Small 501 (c) 6 nonprofit organization (~579 members) * Formed in 1991 * We Promote - Effective and efficient government through the prudent adoption of geospatial technologies - Statewide GIS coordination efforts * We serve as the voice of States for geospatial issues * Actively engaged with many Federal organizations - Especially focused on the FGDC and the National Spatial Data

71

Microsoft Word - JAS-Fort Nelson.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fort Nelson Demonstration Test Fort Nelson Demonstration Test 1 FACT SHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP DEMONSTRATION TEST Partnership Name Plains CO 2 Reduction (PCOR) Partnership - Phase III Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail Darin Damiani, U.S. Department of Energy, Darin.Damiani@netl.doe.gov Principal Investigator Edward Steadman Field Test Information: Field Test Name Fort Nelson Demonstration Test Test Location British Columbia, Canada Amount and Source of CO 2 Tons Approximately 1.2 million tons of CO 2 per year Source Fort Nelson natural gas-processing plant Spectra Energy Natural Resources Canada Field Test Partners (Primary Sponsors) British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources

72

u.s. DEPARn.'lENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlVIINATION  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MC·EFl. MC·EFl. u.s. DEPARn.'lENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlVIINATION RECIPIENT:Clark County PROJECT TITLE: EECBG ~ WSU Building Upgrades & Resource Conservation Mgr Page 1 01'2 STATE: WA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE-FOA-0000013 Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-EE0000856 GFO-OOOO856-001 EEO Based on my review or the infonnation concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authoriud under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A11 Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national, state, and local organizations. 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not

73

Slide 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MA-50 MA-50 DOE/OECM 1 OECM PARS II Working Group: OA Module May 14, 2009 Created by: EES/Dekker PARS II Team 2 Agenda * User Roles with Screens Access Rights * Budget Screen (Revised) * Contacts/Certifications Screens * Gold Card Screen * Standard Reports 3 Roles (Group Names) * Federal Project Director (L4) * Deputy FPD (L4) * Program Point of Contact (L4) * Capital Program Manager (L3) * Program Office Manager (L2) * Program Manager (L1) * Program Analyst (L1) * Interested Party * OECM Senior Management * OECM Analyst * Alternate OECM Analyst * Acquisition Executive * Contracting Officer Representative * Contractor Project Mgr. (CPP) * Contractor Analyst (CPP) MA-50 DOE/OECM 3 PARS II Initiating a Capital Program MA-50 DOE/OECM 4 5. Capital Program Description* 2. Level 1: Program 3. Level 2: Program Office

74

SWP.SACROC.factsheet919  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

M i d l a n d B a s i n Claytonville Pennsylvanian reef reservoirs Modified from Galloway, et al. (1983) SACROC LYNN G ARZA KENT STONEW ALL DA W SON TERRY HASKELL KNO X BO RDEN SCURRY FISHER JO NES T AYLO R NO LAN M ITCHELL HO W ARD MARTIN CO KE 0 20 mi 0 30 km QAd4569x Figure 1. Regional Location Map. FACTSHEET FOR PARTNERSHIP FIELD VALIDATION TEST Partnership Name Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration Contacts: DOE/NETL Project Mgr. Name Organization E-Mail William O'Dowd NETL William.ODowd@NETL.DOE.GOV Principal Investigator Reid Grigg / Brian McPherson NMT reid@prrc.nmt.edu / brian@nmt.edu Field Test Information: Field Test Name

75

Microsoft PowerPoint - 10 Lee LCLS Lessons Learned PM Workshop Final [Compatibility Mode]  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

i i h i h j Presentation Title Linac Coherent Light Source Project at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Hanley Lee, Federal Project Director DOE Project Management Workshop j g p March 10, 2010 1 1.1 Management, Global Controls g 1.2 Injector 1.3 Linac F CLO Building N E i t H ll Far Experiment Hall Near Experiment Hall Far Experiment Hall Near Experiment Hall 2 LCLS Office of Science William Brinkman, Director Acquisition Executive Basic Energy Sciences Harriet Kung, Associate Dir. Tom Brown, LCLS Prog. Mgr. SLAC Site Office Paul Golan, Site Manager Hanley Lee FPD Hanley Lee, FPD Linac Coherent Light Source John Galayda, Project Director Mark Reichanadter, Deputy Proj. Dir. ES&H, QA Business, Admin 3 X-ray Transport Undulator Injector/Linac Conventional Facilities Instrument

76

Utility Data Collection Service  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Data Collection Service Data Collection Service Federal-Utility Partnership Working Group 4 May 2006 Paul Kelley, Chief of Operations, 78 th CES, Robins AFB David Dykes, Industrial Segment Mgr, Federal, GPC Topics  Background  Commodities Metered  Data Collection  Cost  Results Background  Robins AFB (RAFB) needed to:  Control electricity usage and considered Demand Control  Track and bill base tenants for energy usage  Metering Project Originated in 1993  $$ requirements limited interest  Developed criteria for available $$  Energy Policy Act 2005:  All facilities sub-metered by 2012  $$ no longer restricts metering project Metering Criteria prior to EPACT 2005  All New Construction - (per Air Force Instructions)

77

Working With Your Utility to Obtain Metering Services  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Dykes Dykes Federal Segment Mgr Georgia Power/Southern Company Wednesday, 22 May 2013 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group Spring 2013 - May 22-23 San Francisco, CA Hosted by: Pacific Gas and Electric Company  What is the Government Requirement ◦ New DoD Directive  What is Available from Your Serving Utility  Customer Metering Services  Issues to Consider  Conclusion 4.4 million customers 42,000+ MW 27,000 miles of transmission lines 3,700 substations 26,000 employees Other subsidiaries: Southern Linc, Southern Power, Southern Telecom, Southern Nuclear Retail Service Territory across 120,000 square miles  Section 103, EPAct 2005 - All Federal Agencies ◦ Meter electricity on all facilities 30,000 SqFt and larger ◦ Meter those facilities with significant energy usage

78

Document  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

716 Federal Register 716 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Notices Information Management and Privacy Services, Office of Management, invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13). DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before May 18, 2011. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Education Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 395-5806 or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov with a cc: to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be

79

Federal Technical Capability Panel Contacts list  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 U. S. Department of Energy and National Nuclear Security Administration Federal Technical Capability Panel Organization Name Telephone Fax E-Mail FTCP CHAIR Chair (DOE/NTC) Karen L. Boardman (505) 845-6444 (505) 845-6079 kboardman@ntc.doe.gov FTCP Deputy Dave Chaney (505) 845-4300 (505) 845-4879 david.chaney@nnsa.doe.gov FTCP Technical Standards Mgr. Jeanette Yarrington (301) 903-7030 (301) 903-3445 Jeanette.Yarrington@hq.doe.gov FTCP Coordinator Patricia Parrish (505) 845-4057 (505) 284-7057 patricia.parrish@nnsa.doe.gov FTCP Agents DOE Headquarters Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS) Richard Lagdon (202) 586-9471 (202) 586-5533 Chip.Lagdon@eh.doe.gov Office of Health, Safety & Security Pat Worthington (301) 903-6929 (301) 903-3445 pat.worthington@hq.doe.gov

80

An experimental investigation of the effect of sodium chloride on talc solubility and complexing of aqueous magnesium in supercritical hydrothermal fluids  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NaCl at 500'C Figure 4. Plot of mMg species versus NaCI at 500'C Figure S. Plot of Mgr versus NaCI at 600'C Figure 6. Plot of log mMg, ?versus log ag, ct* at 600'C Figure 7. Plot of log mMg, ?versus log act- at 600'C Figure 8. Plot of mMg species... versus NaCl at 600'C Figure 9. Plot of Mgt versus NaCl at 700'C Figure 10. Plot of log mMg, ?versus log att, ct at 700'C . Figure 11. Plot of log mMg, ?versus log act- at 700'C Figure 12. Plot of mMg species versus NaCI at 700'C 26 26 27 27 28...

Grabman, Kenneth Bryan

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "mgr lajos grof-tisza" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Slide 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 MA-50 DOE/OECM 1 OECM PARS II Working Group Oversight & Assessment Module April 30, 2009 Created by: EES/Dekker PARS II Team 2 Agenda * Obtain consensus on screen data elements * Screens to be covered in this meeting are: * PARS II Roles & Access Rights * Budget (Requirements & Discussion) * Gold Card 3 Roles & Access Rights * List of Group Names * Business Rules (draft) * Two Security Models * Supporting Details 4 Group Names * Federal Project Director * Deputy Federal Project Director * OECM Senior Management * OECM Analyst * Alternate OECM Analyst * Contracting Officer Rep. * Interested Party * Federal Program Manager * Program Manager * Program Analyst * Program Point of Contact * Acquisition Executive * Contractor Project Mgr. (CPP) * Contractor Analyst (CPP) MA-50 DOE/OECM 4 5 Business Rules (Draft)

82

Notices  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 Federal Register 8 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Notices requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format. The Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Information Management and Privacy Services, Office of Management, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before June 14, 2011. ADDRESSES: Comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity requirements should be electronically mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or mailed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202-4537. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be

83

BWR Source Term Generation and Evaluation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This calculation is a revision of a previous calculation (Ref. 7.5) that bears the same title and has the document identifier BBAC00000-01717-0210-00006 REV 01. The purpose of this revision is to remove TBV (to-be-verified) -41 10 associated with the output files of the previous version (Ref. 7.30). The purpose of this and the previous calculation is to generate source terms for a representative boiling water reactor (BWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) assembly for the first one million years after the SNF is discharged from the reactors. This calculation includes an examination of several ways to represent BWR assemblies and operating conditions in SAS2H in order to quantify the effects these representations may have on source terms. These source terms provide information characterizing the neutron and gamma spectra in particles per second, the decay heat in watts, and radionuclide inventories in curies. Source terms are generated for a range of burnups and enrichments (see Table 2) that are representative of the waste stream and stainless steel (SS) clad assemblies. During this revision, it was determined that the burnups used for the computer runs of the previous revision were actually about 1.7% less than the stated, or nominal, burnups. See Section 6.6 for a discussion of how to account for this effect before using any source terms from this calculation. The source term due to the activation of corrosion products deposited on the surfaces of the assembly from the coolant is also calculated. The results of this calculation support many areas of the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR), which include thermal evaluation, radiation dose determination, radiological safety analyses, surface and subsurface facility designs, and total system performance assessment. This includes MGR items classified as Quality Level 1, for example, the Uncanistered Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Container (Ref. 7.27, page 7). Therefore, this calculation is subject to the requirements of the Quality Assurance Requirements and Description (Ref. 7.28). The performance of the calculation and development of this document are carried out in accordance with AP-3.124, ''Design Calculation and Analyses'' (Ref. 7.29).

J.C. Ryman

2003-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

84

I I  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Header Sheet Header Sheet .Doc ID # 7 e) AW-h a""- - 'IN r 1,9- / q 1-1- 31 0 )c // C) SC CCN: FUSRAP COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION FSRD= COMM. TYPELL-1-1 FORMER SITES RESTORATION DIVISION (EW-93) SAIC SENSITIVE DATE PROCESSED BY PDCC APR 0 3 1997 COMM REF ADMIN RCD SUBJECT .1 lrhnu rn t FROM To r P, COMM DATE ADDR CODE I I CLOSES CNN Wes I - RESPONSE TRACKING INFORMATION AC TION DESCRIPTION: 01: Ioi: OWEOTO- OWED BY: (ORG) I (ORG) TARGETDAT9.A IcLosiNr cco..coaoip. DATE CLOSING REF- 02: 1 02'. OWED M. OWED BY: (ORG) fORG). .TARGET-DATE CLOSING CCN..COMP. DATE CLOSING REF- MESSAGE: FSRD W/A W/0 SITES: W/A W/0 BNI W/A W/o ACTNG DIRECTOR: W S.., las nup 138 MIS PROGRAM MANAGER: k B.. WIA W/O W/A W/O 112 PNV 139 CIS DEPUTY PROGRAM MGR-: W. F.Vell D. AcK., R. Kii* IISSLD 140 His PROGRAM INT. MGk: G. D..,

85

MESSAGE: WIA W/O CLOSING REF CLOSING REF  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

MESSAGE: MESSAGE: WIA W/O CLOSING REF CLOSING REF _ CONSTRUCTION COMPL DATE J. King SAIC J. Waddell SAIC R. Wright SAIC T. Gangwer SAIC M. Khan SAIC T. Patterson SAIC R. Tucker SAIC C.Helie SAIC K. Renfro SAIC S. Heptinstall SAIC PLEASE RETURN TO PDCC FOR CORRECTIONS MGMT. SYSTEMS: PROGRAM ADMIN.: DEPUTY PROGRAM MGR: PROJECT MANAGER: () I PROGRAM MANAGER: I I ANL: AJ. Dvorak ANL A Geisler ANL G. Maraman ANL D. Dunning ANL J. Wing BNI DIRECTOR. FSRD: L Price FSRD DEP. DIRECTOR. FSRD: W.Seay FSRD SITE MANAGER: D.Adler FSRD " S. Cange FSRD R. Kirk FSRD J. Kopotic FSRD M. Nee FSRD PROJECT SUPPORT GRP: J.Hart FSRD S. Oldham FSRD 4- G. Hartman FSRD L Marz FSRD PRGM ANALYST: B. Hughlett FSRD SECRETARY: M. Seiber"''' Dyke FSRD FSRD CHRON FILE FSRD NOTEBOOKS READING FILE DOEIP&CD: French/Sistrunk DCO DOEIHO: J. Wagoner DHO RESeDNSE TRACKING INFORMATION SECONDARY: / : SECONDARY: ~ OWED TO: / lOWED

86

CRITICALITY CALCULATION FOR THE MOST REACTIVE DEGRADED CONFIGURATIONS OF THE FFTF SNF CODISPOSAL WP CONTAINING AN INTACT IDENT-69 CONTAINER  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of this calculation is to perform additional degraded mode criticality evaluations of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) codisposed in a 5-Defense High-Level Waste (5-DHLW) Waste Package (WP). The scope of this calculation is limited to the most reactive degraded configurations of the codisposal WP with an almost intact Ident-69 container (breached and flooded but otherwise non-degraded) containing intact FFTF SNF pins. The configurations have been identified in a previous analysis (CRWMS M&O 1999a) and the present evaluations include additional relevant information that was left out of the original calculations. The additional information describes the exact distribution of fissile material in each container (DOE 2002a). The effects of the changes that have been included in the baseline design of the codisposal WP (CRWMS M&O 2000) are also investigated. The calculation determines the effective neutron multiplication factor (k{sub eff}) for selected degraded mode internal configurations of the codisposal waste package. These calculations will support the demonstration of the technical viability of the design solution adopted for disposing of MOX (FFTF) spent nuclear fuel in the potential repository. This calculation is subject to the Quality Assurance Requirements and Description (QARD) (DOE 2002b) per the activity evaluation under work package number P6212310M2 in the technical work plan TWP-MGR-MD-000010 REV 01 (BSC 2002).

D.R. Moscalu

2002-08-28T23:59:59.000Z

87

Crystal Structures of the Reduced, Sulfenic Acid, and Mixed Disulfide Forms of SarZ, a Redox Active Global Regulator in Staphylococcus aureus  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SarZ is a global transcriptional regulator that uses a single cysteine residue, Cys{sup 13}, to sense peroxide stress and control metabolic switching and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. SarZ belongs to the single-cysteine class of OhrR-MgrA proteins that play key roles in oxidative resistance and virulence regulation in various bacteria. We present the crystal structures of the reduced form, sulfenic acid form, and mixed disulfide form of SarZ. Both the sulfenic acid and mixed disulfide forms are structurally characterized for the first time for this class of proteins. The Cys{sup 13} sulfenic acid modification is stabilized through two hydrogen bonds with surrounding residues, and the overall DNA-binding conformation is retained. A further reaction of the Cys{sup 13} sulfenic acid with an external thiol leads to formation of a mixed disulfide bond, which results in an allosteric change in the DNA-binding domains, disrupting DNA binding. Thus, the crystal structures of SarZ in three different states provide molecular level pictures delineating the mechanism by which this class of redox active regulators undergoes activation. These structures help to understand redox-mediated virulence regulation in S. aureus and activation of the MarR family proteins in general.

Poor, Catherine B.; Chen, Peng R.; Duguid, Erica; Rice, Phoebe A.; He, Chuan; (UC)

2010-01-20T23:59:59.000Z

88

WASTE HANDLING BUILDING FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Waste Handling Building Fire Protection System provides the capability to detect, control, and extinguish fires and/or mitigate explosions throughout the Waste Handling Building (WHB). Fire protection includes appropriate water-based and non-water-based suppression, as appropriate, and includes the distribution and delivery systems for the fire suppression agents. The Waste Handling Building Fire Protection System includes fire or explosion detection panel(s) controlling various detectors, system actuation, annunciators, equipment controls, and signal outputs. The system interfaces with the Waste Handling Building System for mounting of fire protection equipment and components, location of fire suppression equipment, suppression agent runoff, and locating fire rated barriers. The system interfaces with the Waste Handling Building System for adequate drainage and removal capabilities of liquid runoff resulting from fire protection discharges. The system interfaces with the Waste Handling Building Electrical Distribution System for power to operate, and with the Site Fire Protection System for fire protection water supply to automatic sprinklers, standpipes, and hose stations. The system interfaces with the Site Fire Protection System for fire signal transmission outside the WHB as needed to respond to a fire emergency, and with the Waste Handling Building Ventilation System to detect smoke and fire in specific areas, to protect building high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, and to control portions of the Waste Handling Building Ventilation System for smoke management and manual override capability. The system interfaces with the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) Operations Monitoring and Control System for annunciation, and condition status.

J. D. Bigbee

2000-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

89

On Synthesis of the Big Bang Model with Freundlich's Redshift and its Cosmological Consequences  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We derive exact theoretical value of the constant cosmic background radiation (CBR) temperature $T_0$ using the interconnections between the Gamow, Alpher and Herman (GAH) hot Big Bang cosmology model of the expanding Universe and the modified Freundlich redshift. As a result of this confluence an astonishing relationship between $T_0$ and the four fundamental physical constants $c$,$\\hbar$,$k$,$G$ is found including also the Melvin's value of the Freundlich constant $A_s$.Then the resulting predicted the CBR temperature is $T_0=2.76626 K$. This prediction show excellent agreement with the data obtained from ground-based and balloon-borne observations and also with a mean of the perfect black-body spectrum CMB temperature $2.725 K$ measured COBE in 1992. Using a new cosmological model we determine the horizon scale, age and mass of the present observable Universe. The calculations based on discrete redshift equations for the electromagnetic, electroweak phases and Planck epoch of the Universe predicts a graviton and string masses, which are originated beyond on Planck time. The predicted graviton mass $m_Gr$ is about five orders of magnitude less than the present "the best possible upper bounds on the mass of the graviton", which may be "discovered" in the proposed LISA observations. We present quantitative new results for the different quantum-cosmological parameters. Finally, it is showed that the mystery largeness and smallness dimensionless combination of the Quantum Cosmological constant $\\Lambda_0$ and Planck length $l_Pl$ may be derived as their ratio from the Trans-Planck redshift relation. Thus is found the meaning a famous largeness cosmological number $c^3/\\hbarG\\Lambda_0=2.8*10^{125}$ that is inverse of $\\Lambda_0 l_Pl^2=3.6*10^{-126}$, and "which in 1930s was a regarded as a major problem by Eddington and Dirac".

Asger G. Gasanalizade

2010-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

90

Performance Confirmation Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As described, the purpose of the Performance Confirmation Plan is to specify monitoring, testing, and analysis activities for evaluating the accuracy and adequacy of the information used to determine that performance objectives for postclosure will be met. This plan defines a number of specific performance confirmation activities and associated test concepts in support of the MGR that will be implemented to fulfill this purpose. In doing so, the plan defines an approach to identify key factors and processes, predict performance, establish tolerances and test criteria, collect data (through monitoring, testing, and experiments), analyze these data, and recommend appropriate action. The process of defining which factors to address under performance confirmation incorporates input from several areas. In all cases, key performance confirmation factors are those factors which are: (1) important to safety, (2) measurable and predictable, and (3) relevant to the program (i.e., a factor that i s affected by construction, emplacement, or is a time-dependent variable). For the present version of the plan, performance confirmation factors important to safety are identified using the principal factors from the RSS (CRWMS M and O 2000a) (which is derived from TSPA analyses) together with other available performance assessment analyses. With this basis, key performance confirmation factors have been identified, and test concepts and test descriptions have been developed in the plan. Other activities are also incorporated into the performance confirmation program outside of these key factors. Additional activities and tests have been incorporated when they are prescribed by requirements and regulations or are necessary to address data needs and model validation requirements relevant to postclosure safety. These other activities have been included with identified factors to construct the overall performance confirmation program.

Lindner, E.N.

2000-05-19T23:59:59.000Z

91

EQ6 Calculations for Chemical Degradation Of N Reactor (U-Metal) Spent Nuclear Fuel Waste Packages  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) Waste Package Department of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management & Operating Contractor (CRWMS M&O) performed calculations to provide input for disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from the N Reactor, a graphite moderated reactor at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site (ref. 1). The N Reactor core was fueled with slightly enriched (0.947 wt% and 0.947 to 1.25 wt% {sup 235}U in Mark IV and Mark IA fuels, respectively) U-metal clad in Zircaloy-2 (Ref. 1, Sec. 3). Both types of N Reactor SNF have been considered for disposal at the proposed Yucca Mountain site. For some WPs, the outer shell and inner shell may breach (Ref. 3) allowing the influx of water. Water in the WP will moderate neutrons, increasing the likelihood of a criticality event within the WP; and the water may, in time, gradually leach the fissile components from the WP, further affecting the neutronics of the system. This study presents calculations of the long-term geochemical behavior of WPs containing two multi-canister overpacks (MCO) with either six baskets of Mark IA or five baskets of Mark IV intact N Reactor SNF rods (Ref. 1, Sec. 4) and two high-level waste (HLW) glass pour canisters (GPCs) arranged according to the codisposal concept (Ref. 4). The specific study objectives were to determine: (1) The extent to which fissile uranium will remain in the WP after corrosion/dissolution of the initial WP configuration (2) The extent to which fissile uranium will be carried out of the degraded WP by infiltrating water (such that internal criticality is no longer possible, but the possibility of external criticality may be enhanced); and (3) The nominal chemical composition for the criticality evaluations of the WP design, and to suggest the range of parametric variations for additional evaluations. The scope of this calculation, the chemical compositions (and subsequent criticality evaluations) of the simulations, is limited to time periods up to 6.35 x 10{sup 5} years. This longer time frame is closer to the one million year time horizon recently recommended by the National Academy of Sciences to the Environmental Protection Agency for performance assessment related to a nuclear repository (Ref. 5). However, it is important to note that after 100,000 years, most of the materials of interest (fissile materials) will have either been removed from the WP, reached a steady state, or been transmuted.

P. Bernot

2001-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

92

Subsurface Contamination Control  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There are two objectives of this report, ''Subsurface Contamination Control''. The first is to provide a technical basis for recommending limiting radioactive contamination levels (LRCL) on the external surfaces of waste packages (WP) for acceptance into the subsurface repository. The second is to provide an evaluation of the magnitude of potential releases from a defective WP and the detectability of the released contents. The technical basis for deriving LRCL has been established in ''Retrieval Equipment and Strategy for Wp on Pallet'' (CRWMS M and O 2000g, 6.3.1). This report updates the derivation by incorporating the latest design information of the subsurface repository for site recommendation. The derived LRCL on the external surface of WPs, therefore, supercede that described in CRWMS M and O 2000g. The derived LRCL represent the average concentrations of contamination on the external surfaces of each WP that must not be exceeded before the WP is to be transported to the subsurface facility for emplacement. The evaluation of potential releases is necessary to control the potential contamination of the subsurface repository and to detect prematurely failed WPs. The detection of failed WPs is required in order to provide reasonable assurance that the integrity of each WP is intact prior to MGR closure. An emplaced WP may become breached due to manufacturing defects or improper weld combined with failure to detect the defect, by corrosion, or by mechanical penetration due to accidents or rockfall conditions. The breached WP may release its gaseous and volatile radionuclide content to the subsurface environment and result in contaminating the subsurface facility. The scope of this analysis is limited to radioactive contaminants resulting from breached WPs during the preclosure period of the subsurface repository. This report: (1) documents a method for deriving LRCL on the external surfaces of WP for acceptance into the subsurface repository; (2) provides a table of derived LRCL for nuclides of radiological importance; (3) Provides an as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA) evaluation of the derived LRCL by comparing potential onsite and offsite doses to documented ALARA requirements; (4) Provides a method for estimating potential releases from a defective WP; (5) Provides an evaluation of potential radioactive releases from a defective WP that may become airborne and result in contamination of the subsurface facility; and (6) Provides a preliminary analysis of the detectability of a potential WP leak to support the design of an airborne release monitoring system.

Y. Yuan

2001-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

93

USE OF ONE-ON ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE TOTAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results of analyses of the hypothetical performance of the various configurations of selected natural and engineered elements of the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear-waste repository. These analyses were conducted upon the recommendation of the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (NWTRB) regarding an alternative approach to investigate the identified natural and engineered barriers and associated processes with respect to the postclosure performance of the proposed Yucca Mountain repository. The analyses were conducted per Technical Work Plan (TWP) TWP-MGR-PA-000011 REV 00, Section 3.2.4, Task 2, which states that the task involves ''Identification of barriers that are important to repository performance:'' by means of ''one-on'' analyses to gain a better understanding of repository performance relative to previously identified barriers.'' The ''One-on Analysis'' was performed per Administrative Procedure AP-SIII.9Q. The NWTRB previously reviewed similar analyses conducted by Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (EPRI 2002 [158069]). The approach of the investigation was to simulate the hypothetical performance of the repository after an arbitrarily chosen successive addition of each of the selected natural and engineered barrier components and associated processes that provide for the overall safety of the repository. Because the repository system will behave as an integrated system, the combined interaction of all the processes and barriers identified in this report will provide the ultimate repository performance as indicated in various performance-assessment analyses for the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) M&O 2000 [153246]; Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC (BSC) 2001 [155950]; and Williams 2001 [157307]. The analyses presented in this report should not be construed as an indication, for the chosen additive sequence, of the relative importance on any one barrier or process. Rather, the results of these analyses provide an indication of the relative performance of those barriers and processes and an understanding of their contribution to the overall performance of the proposed repository system. The analyses in this report considered the nominal-performance scenario only, and did not address performance following unlikely disruptive events (e.g., volcanic activity) (10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 63.342).

G.J. Saulnier Jr.

2002-12-18T23:59:59.000Z

94

Uncanistered Spent Nuclear fuel Disposal Container System Description Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Uncanistered Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Disposal Container System supports the confinement and isolation of waste within the Engineered Barrier System of the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR). Disposal containers are loaded with intact uncanistered assemblies and/or individually canistered SNF assemblies and sealed in the surface waste handling facilities, transferred to the underground through the access drifts, and emplaced in the emplacement drifts. The Uncanistered SNF Disposal Container provides long-term confinement of the commercial SNF placed inside, and withstands the loading, transfer, emplacement, and retrieval loads and environments. The Uncanistered SNF Disposal Container System provides containment of waste for a designated period of time, and limits radionuclide release. The disposal container maintains the waste in a designated configuration, withstands maximum handling and rockfall loads, limits the individual SNF assembly temperatures after emplacement, limits the introduction of moderator into the disposal container during the criticality control period, resists corrosion in the expected handling and repository environments, and provides containment of waste in the event of an accident. Multiple boiling water reactor (BWR) and pressurized water reactor (PWR) disposal container designs are needed to accommodate the expected range of spent fuel assemblies and provide long-term confinement of the commercial SNF. The disposal container will include outer and inner cylinder walls, outer cylinder lids (two on the top, one on the bottom), inner cylinder lids (one on the top, one on the bottom), and an internal metallic basket structure. Exterior labels will provide a means by which to identify the disposal container and its contents. The two metal cylinders, in combination with the cladding, Emplacement Drift System, drip shield, and natural barrier, will support the design philosophy of defense-in-depth. The use of materials with different properties prevents a single mode failure from breaching the waste package. The inner cylinder and inner cylinder lids will be constructed of stainless steel and the outer cylinder and outer cylinder lid will be made of high-nickel alloy. The basket will assist criticality control, provide structural support, and improve heat transfer. The Uncanistered SNF Disposal Container System interfaces with the emplacement drift environment and internal waste by transferring heat from the SNF to the external environment and by protecting the SFN assemblies and their contents from damage/degradation by the external environment. The system also interfaces with the SFN by limiting access of moderator and oxidizing agents of the SFN. The waste package interfaces with the Emplacement Drift System's emplacement drift pallets upon which the wasted packages are placed. The disposal container interfaces with the Assembly Transfer System, Waste Emplacement/Retrieval System, Disposal Container Handling System, and Waste Package Remediation System during loading, handling, transfer, emplacement and retrieval of the disposal container/waste package.

NONE

2000-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

95

Waste Emplacement/Retrieval System Description Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Waste Emplacement/Retrieval System transports Waste Packages (WPs) from the Waste Handling Building (WHB) to the subsurface area of emplacement, and emplaces the WPs once there. The system also, if necessary, removes some or all of the WPs from the underground and transports them to the surface. Lastly, the system is designed to remediate abnormal events involving the portions of the system supporting emplacement or retrieval. During emplacement operations, the system operates on the surface between the WHB and North Portal, and in the subsurface in the North Ramp, access mains, and emplacement drifts. During retrieval or abnormal conditions, the operations areas may also extend to a surface retrieval storage site and South Portal on the surface, and the South Ramp in the subsurface. A typical transport and emplacement operation involves the following sequence of events. A WP is loaded into a WP transporter at the WHB, and coupled to a pair of transport locomotives. The locomotives transport the WP from the WHB, down the North Ramp, and to the entrance of an emplacement drift. Once docked at the entrance of the emplacment drift, the WP is moved outside of the WP transporter, and engaged by a WP emplacement gantry. The gantry lifts the WP, and transports it to its emplacement location, where the WP is then lowered to its final resting position. The gantry remains in the drift while the WP transporter is returned to the WHB by the locomotives. When the transporter reaches the WHB, the sequence of operations is repeated. Retrieval of all the WPs, or a large group of WPs, under normal conditions is achieved by reversing the emplacement operations. Retrieval of a small set of WPs, under normal or abnormal conditions, is known as recovery. Recovery performed under abnormal conditions will involve a suite of specialized equipment designed to perform a variety of tasks to enable the recovery process. Recovery after abnormal events may require clearing of equipment, rock, and ground support to facilitate recovery operations. Stabilization of existing ground support and installation of new ground support may also be needed. Recovery of WPs after an event that has contaminated drifts and/or WPs will require limiting the spread of contamination. Specialized equipment will also be necessary for system restoration. The system interfaces with the Subsurface Facility System and Ground Control System for the size and layout of the underground openings. The system interfaces with the Subsurface Ventilation System for the emplacement drift operating environment and the size of the drift isolation doors. The system interfaces with all WP types for the size, weight, and other important parameters affecting emplacement, recovery, and retrieval. The system interfaces with the Subsurface Emplacement Transportation System for the rail system upon which it operates and the distribution of power throuch the rail system. The system interfaces with the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) Operations Monitoring and Control System for the transmission of data to and from the system equipment, and for remote control of system equipment. The system interfaces with the Ground Control System for any repairs that are made. The system interfaces with the Emplacement Drift System for the WP emplacement mode and hardware. The system interfaces with the Disposal Container Handling System and the Waste Handling Building System for the receipt (during emplacement) and delivery (during retrieval/recovery) of WPs.

NONE

2000-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

96

Waste Emplacement/Retrieval System Description Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Waste Emplacement/Retrieval System transports Waste Packages (WPs) from the Waste Handling Building (WHB) to the subsurface area of emplacement, and emplaces the WPs once there. The Waste Emplacement/Retrieval System also, if necessary, removes some or all of the WPs from the underground and transports them to the surface. Lastly, the system is designed to remediate abnormal events involving the portions of the system supporting emplacement or retrieval. During emplacement operations, the system operates on the surface between the WHB and North Portal, and in the subsurface in the North Ramp, access mains, and emplacement drifts. During retrieval or abnormal conditions, the operations areas may also extend to a surface retrieval storage site and South Portal on the surface, and the South Ramp in the subsurface. A typical transport and emplacement operation involves the following sequence of events. A WP is loaded into a WP transporter at the WHB, and coupled to a pair of transport locomotives. The locomotives transport the WP from the WHB, down the North Ramp, and to the entrance of an emplacement drift. Once docked at the entrance of the emplacement drift, the WP is moved outside of the WP transporter, and engaged by a WP emplacement gantry. The WP emplacement gantry lifts the WP, and transports it to its emplacement location, where the WP is then lowered to its final resting position. The WP emplacement gantry remains in the drift while the WP transporter is returned to the WHB by the locomotives. When the transporter reaches the WHB, the sequence of operations is repeated. Retrieval of all the WPs, or a large group of WPs, under normal conditions is achieved by reversing the emplacement operations. Retrieval of a small set of WPs, under normal or abnormal conditions, is known as recovery. Recovery performed under abnormal conditions will involve a suite of specialized equipment designed to perform a variety of tasks to enable the recovery process. Recovery after abnormal events may require clearing of equipment, rock, and ground support to facilitate recovery operations. Stabilization of existing ground support and installation of new ground support may also be needed. Recovery of WP(s) after an event that has contaminated drifts and/or WPs will require limiting the spread of contamination. Specialized equipment will also be necessary for system restoration (e.g., after a derailment, component failure). The Waste Emplacement/Retrieval System interfaces with the Subsurface Facility System and Ground Control System for the size and layout of the underground openings. The system interfaces with the Subsurface Ventilation System for the emplacement drift operating environment and the size of the drift isolation doors. The system interfaces with all WP types for the size, weight, and other important parameters affecting emplacement, recovery, and retrieval. The system interfaces with the Subsurface Emplacement Transportation System for the rail system upon which it operates and the distribution of power through the rail system. The system interfaces with the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) Operations Monitoring and Control System for the transmission of data to and from the system equipment, and for remote control of system equipment. The system interfaces with the Ground Control System for any repairs that are made. The system interfaces with the Emplacement Drift System for the WP emplacement mode and hardware. The system interfaces with the Disposal Container Handling System and the Waste Handling Building System for the receipt (during emplacement) and delivery (during retrieval/recovery) of WPs.

Eric Loros

2001-07-25T23:59:59.000Z

97

EQ6 Calculation for Chemical Degradation of Shippingport LWBR (TH/U Oxide) Spent Nuclear Fuel Waste Packages  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR) Waste Package Department of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management & Operating contractor (CRWMS M&O) performed calculations to provide input for disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from the Shippingport Light Water Breeder Reactor (LWBR) (Ref. 1). The Shippingport LWBR SNF has been considered for disposal at the potential Yucca Mountain site. Because of the high content of fissile material in the SNF, the waste package (WP) design requires special consideration of the amount and placement of neutron absorbers and the possible loss of absorbers and SNF materials over geologic time. For some WPs, the outer shell corrosion-resistant material (CRM) and the corrosion-allowance inner shell may breach (Refs. 2 and 3), allowing the influx of water. Water in the WP will moderate neutrons, increasing the likelihood of a criticality event within the WP; and the water may, in time, gradually leach the fissile components and neutron absorbers from the WP, further affecting the neutronics of the system. This study presents calculations of the long-term geochemical behavior of WPs containing a Shippingport LWBR SNF seed assembly, and high-level waste (HLW) glass canisters arranged according to the codisposal concept (Ref. 4). The specific study objectives were to determine: (1) The extent to which criticality control material, suggested for this WP design, will remain in the WP after corrosion/dissolution of the initial WP configuration (such that it can be effective in preventing criticality); (2) The extent to which fissile uranium and fertile thorium will be carried out of the degraded WP by infiltrating water (such that internal criticality is no longer possible, but the possibility of external criticality may be enhanced); and (3) The nominal chemical composition for the criticality evaluations of the WP design, and to suggest the range of parametric variations for additional evaluations. The scope of this calculation, the chemical compositions (and subsequent criticality evaluations), of the simulations are limited to time periods up to 3.17 x 10{sup 5} years. This longer time frame is closer to the one million year time horizon recently recommended by the National Academy of Sciences to the Environmental Protection Agency for performance assessment related to a nuclear repository (Ref. 5). However, it is important to note that after 100,000 years, most of the materials of interest (fissile and absorber materials) will have either been removed from the WP, reached a steady state, or been transmuted. The calculation included elements with high neutron-absorption cross sections, notably gadolinium (Gd), as well as the fissile materials. The results of this analysis will be used to ensure that the type and amount of criticality control material used in the WP design will prevent criticality.

S. Arthur

2000-09-14T23:59:59.000Z

98

Monitored Geologic Repository Operations Monitoring and Control System Description Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Monitored Geologic Repository Operations Monitoring and Control System provides supervisory control, monitoring, and selected remote control of primary and secondary repository operations. Primary repository operations consist of both surface and subsurface activities relating to high-level waste receipt, preparation, and emplacement. Secondary repository operations consist of support operations for waste handling and treatment, utilities, subsurface construction, and other selected ancillary activities. Remote control of the subsurface emplacement operations, as well as, repository performance confirmation operations are the direct responsibility of the system. In addition, the system monitors parameters such as radiological data, air quality data, fire detection status, meteorological conditions, unauthorized access, and abnormal operating conditions, to ensure a safe workplace for personnel. Parameters are displayed in a real-time manner to human operators regarding surface and subsurface conditions. The system performs supervisory monitoring and control for both important to safety and non-safety systems. The system provides repository operational information, alarm capability, and human operator response messages during emergency response situations. The system also includes logic control to place equipment, systems, and utilities in a safe operational mode or complete shutdown during emergency response situations. The system initiates alarms and provides operational data to enable appropriate actions at the local level in support of emergency response, radiological protection response, evacuation, and underground rescue. The system provides data communications, data processing, managerial reports, data storage, and data analysis. This system's primary surface and subsurface operator consoles, for both supervisory and remote control activities, will be located in a Central Control Center (CCC) inside one of the surface facility buildings. The system consists of instrument and control equipment and components necessary to provide human operators with sufficient information to monitor and control the operation of the repository in an efficient and safe manner. The system consists of operator consoles and workstations, multiple video display terminals, communications and interfacing equipment, and instrument and control software with customized configuration to meet the needs of the Monitored Geologic Repository (MGR). Process and logic controllers and the associated input/output units of each system interfaced with this system will be configured into Remote Terminal Units (RTU) and located close to the systems to be monitored and controlled. The RTUs are configured to remain operational should communication with CCC operations be lost. The system provides closed circuit television to selectively view systems, operations, and equipment areas and to aid in the operation of mechanical systems. Control and monitoring of site utility systems will be located in the CCC. Site utilities include heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment; plant compressed air; plant water; firewater; electrical systems; and inert gases, such as nitrogen, if required. This system interfaces with surface and subsurface systems that either generate output data or require remote control input. The system interfaces with the Site Communications System for bulk storage of operational data, on-site and off-site communication, and a plant-wide public announcement system. The system interfaces with the Safeguards and Security System to provide operational status and emergency alarm indications. The system interfaces with the Site Operation System to provide site wide acquisition of data for analysis and reports, historical information for trends, utility information for plant operation, and to receive operating plans and procedures.

E.F. Loros

2000-06-29T23:59:59.000Z