Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

change in electricity consumption of 166,217 MWh/year. Allincrease in electricity consumption of 166,217 MWh/year alsoelectricity consumption by 166,217 megawatt hours per year (

Kotchen, Matthew J; Grant, Laura E.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

2

Renewable Portfolio Standards in the United States - A Status Report with Data Through 2007  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LSE MISO M-RETS MSW MW MWh PJM POU PRC PSC PUC PV REC RPSelectric service provider PJM Generation Attributes Trackingwaste megawatt megawatt-hour PJM Interconnection publicly

Wiser, Ryan

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

3

Fuel Mix and Emissions Disclosure  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Iowa adopted regulations in 2003 that generally require rate-regulated electric utilities to disclose to customers the fuel mix and estimated emissions, in pounds per megawatt-hour (MWh), of...

4

National Renewable Energy Laboratory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Wh kilowatt-hour LED light emitting diode MECO Maui Electric Company MWh megawatt-hour NAECA National-generation technologies, such as seawater air-conditioning (SWAC) and Light-emitting diodes (LEDs), as an addendum

5

TEAM Initiative Renewabloe Energy Projects Take Shape  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

an estimated 1,200 megawatt-hours (MWh) of clean, renewable electric power annually from solar energy. It is expected to be completed by Fall 2008. Phase 2 projects include a 1.1...

6

Developing and Financing Renewable Energy Projects in Indian Country  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Presenter: Presenter: Robert Springer, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) RES2012 CONFERENCE LAS VEGAS, NEVADA MARCH 1, 2012 Context Technically, Indian lands have enough renewable energy resource to produce:  1 billion megawatt-hours (MWh) of wind (about 148,000 homes)  7 billion MWh of solar photovoltaics (PV)  4 trillion MWh of biomass There are a number of barriers constraining this potential including: * Infrastructure and transmission; * Project development capacity; * Project financing options; * Permitting barriers; * Expertise; * Other Project Development & Finance Project Development & Project Finance Finance? "and then" Finance Or? Hey that doesn't make sense!

7

Slide 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Presenters: Presenters: Samuel Booth, NREL Matthew Ferguson, Reznick Group TRIBAL LEADER FORUM EXPLORING THE BUSINESS LINK OPPORTUNITY: TRANSMISSION & CLEAN ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN THE WEST DENVER, COLORADO FEBRUARY 7-8, 2012 Presentation Overview * Context & Objective * Overview of Renewable Energy: - Project Development - Project Financing * Questions Context Indian lands have enough renewable energy resource to produce:  1.3 million megawatt- hours (MWh) of wind (about 148,000 homes)  9.2 million MWh of solar photovoltaics (PV)  4 million MWh of biomass There are a number of barriers constraining this potential including: * Infrastructure & transmission; * Project development capacity; * Project financing options;

8

Negawatts vs. Megawatts: Recovering California's Secret Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

construction of ten 500-megawatt power plants. These plants, once built, will require transmission lines and substations to deliver the power. 1. California has billions of...

9

MegaWatt Solar | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search Name MegaWatt Solar Place North Carolina Sector Renewable Energy, Solar Product North Carolina-based, technology-centric renewable energy company...

10

High-megawatt Electric Drive Motors  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Page 2. ABB BU Machines April 10, 2009 | Slide 2 High-megawatt Electric Drive Motors ... motor concept ... A selection of compressor motors >30MW. ...

2012-10-21T23:59:59.000Z

11

Property:Com sales (mwh) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

sales (mwh) sales (mwh) Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type Number. Sales to commercial consumers Pages using the property "Com sales (mwh)" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 14,949 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - August 2008 + 26,367 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - December 2008 + 15,395 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 + 16,880 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2009 + 16,286 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2008 + 17,519 +

12

Reference Designs of 50 MW / 250 MWh Energy Storage Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Energy storage solutions for Renewable Integration and Transmission and Distribution (T&D) Grid Support often require systems of 10's of MWs in scale, and energy durations of longer than 4 hours. The goals of this study were to develop cost, performance and conceptual design information for several current and emerging alternative bulk storage systems in the scale of 50 MW / 250 MWh.

2011-12-28T23:59:59.000Z

13

Energy Department Announces New Technical Assistance for Tribal...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

receive technical assistance to help deploy a planned three megawatt solar utility project to generate an estimated 5,000 megawatt hours of electricity to power the Tribe's...

14

Megawatt Energy Systems | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Megawatt Energy Systems Megawatt Energy Systems Jump to: navigation, search Name Megawatt Energy Systems Place Zionsville, Indiana Sector Renewable Energy, Services, Solar, Wind energy Phone number 317.797.3381 Website http://www.mwenergysystems.com Coordinates 39.9508733°, -86.261937° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.9508733,"lon":-86.261937,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

15

Property:PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The area of potential onshore wind in a place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialOnshoreWindGeneration" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25)

16

Property:PotentialRooftopPVGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialRooftopPVGeneration PotentialRooftopPVGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialRooftopPVGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from Rooftop PV for a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialRooftopPVGeneration" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25)

17

Property:PotentialOffshoreWindGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialOffshoreWindGeneration PotentialOffshoreWindGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialOffshoreWindGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from Offshore Wind for a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialOffshoreWindGeneration" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25)

18

Property:PotentialCSPGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialCSPGeneration PotentialCSPGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialCSPGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from CSP for a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialCSPGeneration" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25)

19

Property:PotentialBiopowerSolidGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialBiopowerSolidGeneration PotentialBiopowerSolidGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialBiopowerSolidGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from solid biopower for a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialBiopowerSolidGeneration" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25)

20

Property:PotentialHydropowerGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialHydropowerGeneration PotentialHydropowerGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialHydropowerGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from Hydropower for a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialHydropowerGeneration" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Property:PotentialGeothermalHydrothermalGeneration | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialGeothermalHydrothermalGeneration PotentialGeothermalHydrothermalGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialGeothermalHydrothermalGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from Geothermal Hydrothermal for a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialGeothermalHydrothermalGeneration"

22

Property:PotentialRuralUtilityScalePVGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialRuralUtilityScalePVGeneration PotentialRuralUtilityScalePVGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialRuralUtilityScalePVGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from utility-scale PV in rural areas of a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialRuralUtilityScalePVGeneration"

23

Property:PotentialUrbanUtilityScalePVGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialUrbanUtilityScalePVGeneration PotentialUrbanUtilityScalePVGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialUrbanUtilityScalePVGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from utility-scale PV in urban areas of a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialUrbanUtilityScalePVGeneration"

24

Property:PotentialEGSGeothermalGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialEGSGeothermalGeneration PotentialEGSGeothermalGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialEGSGeothermalGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from EGS Geothermal for a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialEGSGeothermalGeneration" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25)

25

Property:PotentialBiopowerGaseousGeneration | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

PotentialBiopowerGaseousGeneration PotentialBiopowerGaseousGeneration Jump to: navigation, search Property Name PotentialBiopowerGaseousGeneration Property Type Quantity Description The estimated potential energy generation from gaseous biopower for a particular place. Use this type to express a quantity of energy. The default unit for energy on OpenEI is the Kilowatt hour (kWh), which is 3,600,000 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_energy It's possible types are Watt hours - 1000 Wh, Watt hour, Watthour Kilowatt hours - 1 kWh, Kilowatt hour, Kilowatthour Megawatt hours - 0.001 MWh, Megawatt hour, Megawatthour Gigawatt hours - 0.000001 GWh, Gigawatt hour, Gigawatthour Joules - 3600000 J, Joules, joules Pages using the property "PotentialBiopowerGaseousGeneration" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25)

26

SunShot Initiative: 10-Megawatt Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Turbine  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10-Megawatt Supercritical Carbon 10-Megawatt Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Turbine to someone by E-mail Share SunShot Initiative: 10-Megawatt Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Turbine on Facebook Tweet about SunShot Initiative: 10-Megawatt Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Turbine on Twitter Bookmark SunShot Initiative: 10-Megawatt Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Turbine on Google Bookmark SunShot Initiative: 10-Megawatt Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Turbine on Delicious Rank SunShot Initiative: 10-Megawatt Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Turbine on Digg Find More places to share SunShot Initiative: 10-Megawatt Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Turbine on AddThis.com... Concentrating Solar Power Systems Components Competitive Awards CSP Research & Development Thermal Storage CSP Recovery Act Baseload CSP SunShot Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative

27

2008 High-Megawatt Power Converter Technology R&D ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... 2008 High-Megawatt Power Converter Technology R&D Roadmap Workshop. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD. April 8, 2008. On ...

2013-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

28

Property:Ind sales (mwh) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

industrial consumers industrial consumers Pages using the property "Ind sales (mwh)" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 18,637 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - August 2008 + 19,022 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - December 2008 + 14,148 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 + 18,516 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2009 + 14,517 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2008 + 17,398 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2009 + 14,930 +

29

Property:Tot sales (mwh) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

all consumers all consumers Pages using the property "Tot sales (mwh)" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 69,154 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - August 2008 + 104,175 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - December 2008 + 78,855 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 + 93,756 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2009 + 87,806 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2008 + 87,721 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2009 + 88,236 +

30

Property:Res sales (mwh) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

residential consumers residential consumers Pages using the property "Res sales (mwh)" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) 4 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 35,568 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - August 2008 + 58,786 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - December 2008 + 49,312 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 + 58,360 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2009 + 57,003 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2008 + 52,804 + 4-County Electric Power Assn (Mississippi) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2009 + 56,047 +

31

Property:Oth sales (mwh) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

other consumers other consumers Pages using the property "Oth sales (mwh)" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) C Central Illinois Pub Serv Co (Illinois) EIA Revenue and Sales - April 2008 + 1,113 + Central Illinois Pub Serv Co (Illinois) EIA Revenue and Sales - December 2008 + 1,202 + Central Illinois Pub Serv Co (Illinois) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2008 + 536 + Central Illinois Pub Serv Co (Illinois) EIA Revenue and Sales - February 2009 + 2,187 + Central Illinois Pub Serv Co (Illinois) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2008 + 707 + Central Illinois Pub Serv Co (Illinois) EIA Revenue and Sales - January 2009 + 1,537 + Central Illinois Pub Serv Co (Illinois) EIA Revenue and Sales - June 2008 + 697 + Central Illinois Pub Serv Co (Illinois) EIA Revenue and Sales - March 2008 + 880 +

32

Final Environmental Impact Report: North Brawley Ten Megawatt...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Number NA DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Final Environmental Impact Report: North Brawley Ten Megawatt Geothermal...

33

Total Cost Per MwH for all common large scale power generation...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

per MWh or KWh for the various sources ? I suspect that the costs commonly quoted for fossil fuels and nucelar are artificially low and that these fake costs are used to 'sell'...

34

Final Environmental Impact Report: North Brawley Ten Megawatt Geothermal  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Final Environmental Impact Report: North Brawley Ten Megawatt Geothermal Final Environmental Impact Report: North Brawley Ten Megawatt Geothermal Demonstration Facility Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Report: Final Environmental Impact Report: North Brawley Ten Megawatt Geothermal Demonstration Facility Abstract N/A Author County of Imperial Planning Department Published WESTEC SERVICES, INC., 1979 Report Number N/A DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http://crossref.org Online Internet link for Final Environmental Impact Report: North Brawley Ten Megawatt Geothermal Demonstration Facility Citation County of Imperial Planning Department. 1979. Final Environmental Impact Report: North Brawley Ten Megawatt Geothermal Demonstration Facility. (!) : WESTEC SERVICES, INC.. Report No.: N/A. Retrieved from

35

Massachusetts Takes On Climate Change  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

promote a clean and green energy economy. Massachusetts'megawatt-hours of green energy supplied to its customers.job creation in the green energy sector, promote workforce

Kimmell, Ken; Laurie, Burt

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

36

Technology@TMS: Online Article  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The solar electric photovoltaic (PV) system will generate approximately 200 megawatt hours of electricity annually and provide up to eight percent of the...

37

Megatons to Megawatts Final Shipment | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Megawatts Program, with this week's off-loading of the final shipment of low enriched uranium (LEU) at the Port of Baltimore in Baltimore, Maryland, from Russia. Facebook Twitter...

38

NREL: Wind Research - Five Megawatt Dynamometer Test Facility...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Energy's National Wind Technology Center. We're here today in the new 5 megawatt drive train testing facility that has been developed over the last few years. This terrific new...

39

Total Cost Per MwH for all common large scale power generation sources |  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Total Cost Per MwH for all common large scale power generation sources Total Cost Per MwH for all common large scale power generation sources Home > Groups > DOE Wind Vision Community In the US DOEnergy, are there calcuations for real cost of energy considering the negative, socialized costs of all commercial large scale power generation soruces ? I am talking about the cost of mountain top removal for coal mined that way, the trip to the power plant, the sludge pond or ash heap, the cost of the gas out of the stack, toxificaiton of the lakes and streams, plant decommision costs. For nuclear yiou are talking about managing the waste in perpetuity. The plant decomission costs and so on. What I am tring to get at is the 'real cost' per MWh or KWh for the various sources ? I suspect that the costs commonly quoted for fossil fuels and nucelar are

40

Mass Megawatts Wind Power Inc | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Megawatts Wind Power Inc Megawatts Wind Power Inc Jump to: navigation, search Name Mass Megawatts Wind Power Inc Address 95 Prescott Street Place Worcester, Massachusetts Zip 01605 Sector Wind energy Product Development of low-cost, wind energy production systems Website http://www.massmegawatts.com/ Coordinates 42.2776492°, -71.7996281° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":42.2776492,"lon":-71.7996281,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

approximately 200 megawatts (MWs) of power from TCEP, making  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

approximately 200 megawatts (MWs) of power from TCEP, making approximately 200 megawatts (MWs) of power from TCEP, making it the first U.S. purchase by a utility of low-carbon power from a commercial-scale, coal-based power plant with carbon capture. The 400-MW TCEP plant is a first-of-its-kind integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) poly-generation facility capable of capturing 90 percent of the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) it produces. The $2.4-billion plant was a third round selection under DOE's Clean Coal Power Initiative

42

Utility green pricing programs: A statistical analysis of program effectiveness  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Total renewable energy purchases of residential program participants in megawatt-hours divided by total eligible residential electrical usage.Total renewable energy purchases of non-residential program participants in megawatt-hours divided by total eligible non- residential electrical usage.

Wiser, Ryan; Olson, Scott; Bird, Lori; Swezey, Blair

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

43

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrElctrtyTotal | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Property Property Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrElctrtyTotal Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Electricity, total Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrElctrtyTotal" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 1400.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 686.9 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 321.8 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 1689.9 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 122.6 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 843.1 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 1487.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 315.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 1963.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 66.52 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 391.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 809.65 +

44

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrElctrtyTotal | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrElctrtyTotal SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrElctrtyTotal Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Electricity, total Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrElctrtyTotal" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 1399.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 686.9 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 321.8 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 1689.9 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 122.6 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 843.1 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 1487.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 315.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 1963.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 66.52 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 391.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 809.65 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 1199.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 227.66 +

45

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrOil-FiredBoiler | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrOil-FiredBoiler SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrOil-FiredBoiler Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Oil-fired boiler Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrOil-FiredBoiler" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

46

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrTownGas | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrTownGas SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrTownGas Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Town gas Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrTownGas" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

47

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDstrtHeating | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDstrtHeating SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDstrtHeating Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. District heating Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDstrtHeating" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 2067.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 492.2 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 473.4 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 1763.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 605.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 1727.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 1448.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 844.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 2176.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 61.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 967.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 1185.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 1704.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 154.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 145.0 +

48

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDigesterLandfillGas | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDigesterLandfillGas SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDigesterLandfillGas Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Digester / landfill gas Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDigesterLandfillGas" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 +

49

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDstrtColg | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDstrtColg SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDstrtColg Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. District cooling Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDstrtColg" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 762.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 322.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 51.9 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 908.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 345.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 450.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 123.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 600.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 78.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 340.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 420.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 +

50

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrTownGas | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrTownGas SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrTownGas Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Town gas Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrTownGas" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

51

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDigesterLandfillGas | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDigesterLandfillGas SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDigesterLandfillGas Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Digester / landfill gas Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDigesterLandfillGas" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 +

52

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrWoodChips | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrWoodChips SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrWoodChips Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Wood chips Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrWoodChips" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

53

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDstrtHeating | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDstrtHeating SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDstrtHeating Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. District heating Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrDstrtHeating" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 2193.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 521.2 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 498.4 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 1869.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 646.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 1843.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 1542.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 898.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 2313.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 65.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 1032.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 1256.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 1817.6002445 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 162.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 158.0 +

54

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrLogs | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrLogs SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrLogs Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Logs Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrLogs" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0017 + 0.0 +

55

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrNaturalGas | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrNaturalGas SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrNaturalGas Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Natural gas Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrNaturalGas" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

56

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrLogs | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrLogs SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrLogs Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Logs Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrLogs" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

57

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrWoodChips | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrWoodChips SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrWoodChips Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Wood chips Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrWoodChips" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

58

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrOther | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrOther SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrOther Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Other Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrOther" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0017 + 0.0 +

59

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDstrtColg | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDstrtColg SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDstrtColg Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. District cooling Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrDstrtColg" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 762.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 322.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 51.9 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 908.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 345.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 450.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 123.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 600.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 78.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 340.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 420.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 +

60

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrPellets | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrPellets SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrPellets Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Pellets Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrPellets" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrOil-FiredBoiler | Open  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrOil-FiredBoiler SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrOil-FiredBoiler Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Oil-fired boiler Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrOil-FiredBoiler" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 +

62

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrOther | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrOther SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrOther Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Other Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrOther" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

63

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrTotal | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrTotal SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrTotal Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Total Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrTotal" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 4355.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 1530.1 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 872.1 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 4466.9 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 768.6 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 3031.1 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 3479.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 1336.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 4876.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 131.52 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 1501.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 2405.65 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 3436.6002445 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 389.66 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 270.0 +

64

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrPellets | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrPellets SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrPellets Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Pellets Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyNrmlYrMwhYrPellets" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

65

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrTotal | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrTotal SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrTotal Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Total Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrTotal" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 4228.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 1501.1 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 847.1 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 4360.9 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 727.6 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 2915.1 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 3385.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 1282.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 4739.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 127.52 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 1436.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 2334.65 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 3323.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 381.66 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 257.0 +

66

Property:Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrNaturalGas | Open Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrNaturalGas SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrNaturalGas Jump to: navigation, search This is a property of type String. Natural gas Pages using the property "Building/SPPurchasedEngyForPeriodMwhYrNaturalGas" Showing 25 pages using this property. (previous 25) (next 25) S Sweden Building 05K0001 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0002 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0003 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0004 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0005 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0006 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0007 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0008 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0009 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0010 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0011 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0012 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0013 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0014 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0015 + 0.0 + Sweden Building 05K0016 + 0.0 +

67

Natural Gas - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) - U.S. Energy  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0, 2013 | Release Date: March 21, 0, 2013 | Release Date: March 21, 2013 | Next Release: March 28, 2013 Previous Issues Week: 12/22/2013 (View Archive) JUMP TO: In The News | Overview | Prices/Demand/Supply | Storage In the News: In the News: Average price spread of natural gas delivered to the power sector over coal declined by over three-quarters in 2012, while ratio of net natural gas power generation to coal rose by 39 percent. The average price of natural gas delivered in the United States to electric power generators decreased to $28.16 per megawatt hour (MWh) in 2012, 28 percent below the average for 2011, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) Electric Power Monthly. This reflects a spread of $3.22 per MWh over the average annual price of coal delivered

68

Megawatts vs. Negawatts: how a little can do a lot  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In some quarters there is increased emphasis on overall reduction of energy usage from customers. One indication of the growing significance of negawatts is apparent at PJM Interconnection, where customers are encouraged to bid negative load into the wholesale market in direct competition with megawatts. This negative load, while not large in absolute terms relative to the 164 GW size of the PJM market, is nevertheless critical in introducing an element of price elasticity into what would otherwise be a virtually inelastic demand.

NONE

2008-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

69

Notices  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

72 Federal Register 72 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 112 / Friday, June 10, 2011 / Notices module would contain 2 generating units with a total combined capacity of 2.2 megawatts (MW); (5) a new switchyard containing a transformer; (6) a proposed 300-feet-long, 13-kilovolt (kV) transmission line to an existing distribution line. The proposed project would have an average annual generation of 10.6 megawatt-hours (MWh), which would be sold to a local utility. Applicant Contact: Mr. Wayne Krouse, Hydro Green Energy LLC, 5090 Richmond Avenue #390, Houston, TX 77056; phone (877) 556-6566 x709. FERC Contact: Michael Spencer, (202) 502-6093. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file competing applications: 60

70

untitled  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BREA POWER II, LLC'S BREA POWER II, LLC'S OLINDA COMBINED CYCLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT FUELED BY WASTE LANDFILL GAS, BREA, CALIFORNIA U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory October 2010 DOE/EA-1744 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CHP combined heat and power CO carbon monoxide dBA A-weighted decibel DOE U.S. Department of Energy (also called the Department) EA environmental assessment EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency kWh kilowatt-hour mmscfd million standard cubic feet of landfill gas per day MW megawatt MWh megawatt-hour NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEPA National Environmental Policy Act, as amended NO 2 nitrogen dioxide

71

Desktop megawatt superradiant free-electron laser at terahertz frequencies  

SciTech Connect

I present a theoretical and simulation study of a desktop, megawatt (MW), terahertz (THz) superradiance free-electron laser (FEL) driven by a THz-pulse-train photoinjector. With nominal electron parameters from a THz-pulse-train photoinjector, this superradiant FEL is capable of generating more than 5 MW power at THz frequencies from a half-meter, single-pass undulator. Tapering the undulator to a length of 1.5 m can further increase the FEL output power to nearly 15 MW.

Huang, Y.-C. [Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsinghua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan (China)

2010-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

72

Definition: Gross generation | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Definition Definition Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon » Definition: Gross generation Jump to: navigation, search Dictionary.png Gross generation The total amount of electric energy produced by generating units (e.g. power plants) and measured at the generating terminal in kilowatt-hours (kWh) or megawatt-hours (MWh).[1] View on Wikipedia Wikipedia Definition Related Terms Electricity generation, Net generation, power References ↑ http://205.254.135.24/tools/glossary/index.cfm?id=G#gross_gen Retri Like Like You like this.Sign Up to see what your friends like. eved from "http://en.openei.org/w/index.php?title=Definition:Gross_generation&oldid=480543" Category: Definitions What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link

73

Fuel Mix and Emissions Disclosure | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

You are here You are here Home » Fuel Mix and Emissions Disclosure Fuel Mix and Emissions Disclosure < Back Eligibility Utility Program Info State Maryland Program Type Generation Disclosure Provider Maryland Public Service Commission Maryland's 1999 electric utility restructuring legislation requires all electric companies and electricity suppliers to provide customers with details regarding the fuel mix and emissions of electric generation. Emissions data must be expressed in terms of pounds per megawatt-hour (MWh). This information must be provided to customers every six months and annually to the Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC). Past reports are available in Case No. 8738 through the [http://webapp.psc.state.md.us/Intranet/Casenum/caseform_new.cfm? PSC's

74

Fuel Mix and Emissions Disclosure | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fuel Mix and Emissions Disclosure Fuel Mix and Emissions Disclosure Fuel Mix and Emissions Disclosure < Back Eligibility Utility Program Info State Michigan Program Type Generation Disclosure Provider Michigan Public Service Commission Michigan's Customer Choice and Electric Reliability Act of 2000 (P.A. 141) requires electric suppliers to disclose to customers details related to the fuel mix and emissions, in pounds per megawatt-hour (MWh) of electric generation. Electric suppliers must provide this information to customers twice annually in a standardized, uniform format. The Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) staff must calculate the regional electricity generation and environmental characteristics and make it available to be used by the state's generation providers. The web site above describes the

75

Definition: Electricity generation | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Electricity generation Electricity generation Jump to: navigation, search Dictionary.png Electricity generation The process of producing electric energy or the amount of electric energy produced by transforming other forms of energy into electrical energy; commonly expressed in kilowatt-hours (kWh) or megawatt-hours (MWh).[1][2] View on Wikipedia Wikipedia Definition Electricity generation is the process of generating electrical power from other sources of primary energy. The fundamental principles of electricity generation were discovered during the 1820s and early 1830s by the British scientist Michael Faraday. His basic method is still used today: electricity is generated by the movement of a loop of wire, or disc of copper between the poles of a magnet. For electric utilities, it is the

76

Renewable and Recycled Energy Objective | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Renewable and Recycled Energy Objective Renewable and Recycled Energy Objective Renewable and Recycled Energy Objective < Back Eligibility Investor-Owned Utility Municipal Utility Rural Electric Cooperative Savings Category Bioenergy Buying & Making Electricity Water Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Solar Wind Program Info State North Dakota Program Type Renewables Portfolio Standard Provider North Dakota Public Service Commission In March 2007, the North Dakota enacted legislation (H.B. 1506) establishing an ''objective'' that 10% of all retail electricity sold in the state be obtained from renewable energy and recycled energy by 2015. The objective must be measured by qualifying megawatt-hours (MWh) delivered at retail, or by credits purchased and retired to offset non-qualifying

77

Optimization of Demand Response Through Peak Shaving  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Jun 19, 2013 ... periods, for which he incurs an energy charge (per megawatt hour ... before the prevalence of electricity markets, in the context of public utility pricing and ra- ...

78

FEMP Focus: Fall 2003 Issue  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

event of utility interruptions, and will provide 68 percent (56,402 megawatt-hours per year) of the Base's electricity requirement. FEMP Focus: As a FEMP constituent, how do you...

79

Essays in Applied Microeconomics  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Effects of Low-Cost Hydro Power on Industrial Location,Fossil Fuel Nuclear Others Hydro Fossil Fuel Nuclear Others1000 Megawatt Hours) Hydro Hydro Fossil Fuel Nuclear Others

Severnini, Edson Roberto

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

DOE to Develop Multi-Megawatt Offshore Wind Turbine with General Electric |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to Develop Multi-Megawatt Offshore Wind Turbine with General to Develop Multi-Megawatt Offshore Wind Turbine with General Electric DOE to Develop Multi-Megawatt Offshore Wind Turbine with General Electric March 9, 2006 - 11:44am Addthis Contract Valued at $27 million, supports President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden, Colorado, has signed a $27 million, multi-year contract with the General Electric Company (GE) to develop a new offshore wind power system over the next several years. Approximately $8 million of the offshore wind project will be cost-shared by DOE. "Offshore wind technology, another aspect of President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative, can reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources as

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Berkeley Lab Facilitates 18.6-megawatt PV facility at Army's Fort  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Berkeley Lab Facilitates 18.6-megawatt PV facility at Army's Fort Berkeley Lab Facilitates 18.6-megawatt PV facility at Army's Fort Detrick, Maryland December 2013 The Army, on Friday November 29, announced a notice of intent to award a contract to build an 18.6-megawatt solar photovoltaic (PV) facility at Fort Detrick, in Frederick, Maryland. This action will help the service meet its goal of deploying one gigawatt of renewable energy by 2025. The selected contractor is Framingham, Mass.-based Ameresco. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), through its Environmental Energy Technologies Division, provided essential technical services, over a span of two years, to make this project happen. Supported by the Federal Energy Management Program, Berkeley Lab renewable power expert Gerald Robinson provided the Army, Fort Detrick staff, its Energy

82

Analysis of the tradeoff between irrigated agriculure and hydroelectric power in the Pacific Northwest. [Base-line estimate of the effects of agricultural irrigation on the hydroelectric power generating potential projected for the year 2020  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Hydrogeneration and irrigated agriculture are major competing users of the waters of the Columbia River and its tributaries. Irrigated agriculture requires the diversion of large amounts of water from the rivers, only part of which returns. As a result, streamflow is reduced and the generation potential of dams located downstream from points of irrigation diversion is reduced. In addition, irrigated agriculture involves the direct consumption of electricity to pump irrigation water and to apply it to crops in the field. The purpose of this report is to make a baseline estimate of the impact on the electrical generation system in the region of the level of irrigation development projected for year 2020 by the states of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. This baseline estimate reflects the assumption that current conditions will prevail in the future. The results, therefore, provide a standard against which the impacts of changes in current conditions can be measured. It is estimated that the projected development level of 11.4 million acres of irrigated agriculture in Oregon, Washington, and Idaho by year 2020 would result in foregone hydroelectric generation potential of approximately 17.8 million megawatt-hours (MWh) annually and direct consumption of electric power for pumping and application of approximately 10.3 million MWh's annually. Thus, a total of 28.1 million MWh's of electric power generation will have to be traded off each year if irrigated agriculture is to be conducted on the projected scale. (ERB)

Davis, A. E.

1979-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

Reference design of 100 MW-h lithium/iron sulfide battery system for utility load leveling  

SciTech Connect

The first year in a two-year cooperative effort between Argonne National Laboratory and Rockwell International to develop a conceptual design of a lithium alloy/iron sulfide battery for utility load leveling is presented. A conceptual design was developed for a 100 MW-h battery system based upon a parallel-series arrangement of 2.5 kW-h capacity cells. The sales price of such a battery system was estimated to be very high, $80.25/kW-h, exclusive of the cost of the individual cells, the dc-to-ac converters, site preparation, or land acquisition costs. Consequently, the second year's efforts were directed towards developing modified designs with significantly lower potential costs.

Zivi, S.M.; Kacinskas, H.; Pollack, I.; Chilenskas, A.A.; Barney, D.L.; Grieve, W.; McFarland, B.L.; Sudar, S.; Goldstein, E.; Adler, E.

1980-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

"YEAR","MONTH","STATE","UTILITY CODE","UTILITY NAME","RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATIONPHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY (MWh)","COMMERCIAL TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITYFOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","RESIDENTIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","COMMERCIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INDUSTRIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","TRANSPORTATION INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","RESIDENTIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","COMMERCIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","INDUSTRIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","TRANSPORTATION NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

TRANSPORTATIONPHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY (MWh)","COMMERCIAL TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITYFOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","RESIDENTIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","COMMERCIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INDUSTRIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","TRANSPORTATION INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","RESIDENTIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","COMMERCIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","INDUSTRIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","TRANSPORTATION NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED"

85

Management of the ten-megawatt solar-thermal central-receiver pilot-plant project  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report deals with inspection (between April and May 1979) of the Ten-Megawatt Solar-Thermal Central-Receiver Pilot-Plant Project being constructed in Barstow, California by the Department of Energy (DOE) and a utility consortium. At the time of inspection the project was behind schedule and over its projected cost. The project was subsequently rescheduled for initial operation by June 1982 at an estimated cost of $139.5 million. Recommendations are included relative to: better utilization of DOE resources; modified date for initial operation; and initiation of independent management audits. Comments to the draft report are appended. (PSB)

Not Available

1980-06-20T23:59:59.000Z

86

EPA Clean Energy-Environment Technical Forum Renewable Energy Certificates: Background & Resources  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Renewable energy certificates (RECs) are transferable commodities that represent the environmental and other non-power attributes of renewable energy. RECs are used to demonstrate compliance with state renewable portfolio standards (RPS) which are designed to increase development and production of energy from renewable resources by imposing mandated targets for retail sales of renewable generation. RECS are also used in the voluntary green power market which allows individual purchasers to voluntarily purchase a REC and then claim an environmental benefit associated with that purchase. This background paper describes the importance of RECs and how state RPS policies and tracking systems influence REC availability, cost of compliance and price differences in REC markets from state to state. Resources for additional information about these topics are also provided. I. What is a REC? Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) represent the environmental and other non-power attributes of renewable electricity. RECs are measured in megawatt-hours (MWh) and are created at the point of generation, as the electricity is introduced into the electricity grid. RECs are numbered, paper certificates that represent each MWh of renewable energy sold and provide

unknown authors

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

Conceptual design of electrical balance of plant for advanced battery energy storage facility. Annual report, March 1979. [20-MW, 100 MWh  

SciTech Connect

Large-scale efforts are in progress to develop advanced batteries for utility energy storage systems. Realization of the full benefits available from those systems requires development, not only of the batteries themselves, but also the ac/dc power converter, the bulk power interconnecting equipment, and the peripheral electric balance of plant equipment that integrate the battery/converter into a properly controlled and protected energy system. This study addresses these overall system aspects; although tailored to a 20-MW, 100-MWh lithium/sulfide battery system, the technology and concepts are applicable to any battery energy storage system. 42 figures, 14 tables. (RWR)

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

A Multi Megawatt Cyclotron Complex to Search for CP Violation in the Neutrino Sector  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A Multi Megawatt Cyclotron complex able to accelerate H2+ to 800 MeV/amu is under study. It consists of an injector cyclotron able to accelerate the injected beam up to 50 MeV/n and of a booster ring made of 8 magnetic sectors and 8 RF cavities. The magnetic field and the forces on the superconducting coils are evaluated using the 3-D code OPERA. The injection and extraction trajectories are evaluated using the well tested codes developed by the MSU group in the '80s. The advantages to accelerate H2+ are described and preliminary evaluations on the feasibility and expected problems to build the injector cyclotron and the ring booster are here presented.

L. Calabretta; M. Maggiore; L. A. C. Piazza; D. Rifuggiato; A. Calanna

2010-10-07T23:59:59.000Z

89

Economic Development Impacts of Colorado's First 1,000 Megawatts of Wind Energy  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This fact sheet summarizes the findings of a report authored by Sandra Reategui and Suzanne Tegen of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). A confluence of events ignited soaring growth in the number of Colorado?s wind power installations in recent years, from 291 megawatts (MW) of nameplate capacity in 2006 to 1,067 MW (nameplate capacity) in 2007. Analyzing the economic impact of Colorado?s first 1,000 MW of wind energy development not only provides a summary of benefits now enjoyed by the state?s population, but it also provides a sense of the economic development opportunities associated with other new wind project scenarios, including the U.S. Department of Energy?s 20% Wind Energy by 2030 scenario. The analysis can be used by interested parties in other states as an example of the potential economic impacts if they were to adopt 1,000 MW of wind power development.

Not Available

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

Narrow linewidth picosecond pulsed laser with mega-watt peak power at UV wavelength  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We demonstrate a master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) burst mode laser system to generate 66 ps/402.5 MHz pulses with mega-watt peak power at 355 nm. The seed laser is based on a direct electro-optic modulation of a fiber laser output. A very high extinction ratio (45 dB) has been achieved by using an adaptive bias control. The multi-stage Nd:YAG amplifier system allows a uniformly temporal shaping of macropulses with tunable pulse duration. The light output form the amplifier is converted to 355 nm and over 1 MW UV peak power is obtained when the laser is operating in a 5- s/10-Hz macropulse mode. The laser output has a transform limited spectrum bandwidth with a very narrow linewidth of individual laser mode. The immediate application of the laser system is the laser assisted hydrogen ion beam stripping for the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS).

Liu, Yun [ORNL; Huang, Chunning [ORNL; Deibele, Craig Edmond [ORNL

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

Project X - a new multi-megawatt proton source at Fermilab  

SciTech Connect

Project X is a multi-megawatt proton facility being developed to support intensity frontier research in elementary particle physics, with possible applications to nuclear physics and nuclear energy research, at Fermilab. The centerpiece of this program is a superconducting H-linac that will support world leading programs in long baseline neutrino experimentation and the study of rare processes. Based on technology shared with the International Linear Collider (ILC), Project X will provide multi-MW beams at 60-120 GeV from the Main Injector, simultaneous with very high intensity beams at lower energies. Project X will also support development of a Muon Collider as a future facility at the energy frontier.

Nagaitsev, S.; /Fermilab

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

Comparative Assessment of Direct Drive High Temperature Superconducting Generators in Multi-Megawatt Class Wind Turbines  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This paper summarizes the work completed under the CRADA between NREL and American Superconductor (AMSC). The CRADA combined NREL and AMSC resources to benchmark high temperature superconducting direct drive (HTSDD) generator technology by integrating the technologies into a conceptual wind turbine design, and comparing the design to geared drive and permanent magnet direct drive (PMDD) wind turbine configurations. Analysis was accomplished by upgrading the NREL Wind Turbine Design Cost and Scaling Model to represent geared and PMDD turbines at machine ratings up to 10 MW and then comparing cost and mass figures of AMSC's HTSDD wind turbine designs to theoretical geared and PMDD turbine designs at 3.1, 6, and 10 MW sizes. Based on the cost and performance data supplied by AMSC, HTSDD technology has good potential to compete successfully as an alternative technology to PMDD and geared technology turbines in the multi megawatt classes. In addition, data suggests the economics of HTSDD turbines improve with increasing size, although several uncertainties remain for all machines in the 6 to 10 MW class.

Maples, B.; Hand, M.; Musial, W.

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

93

Comparative Assessment of Direct Drive High Temperature Superconducting Generators in Multi-Megawatt Class Wind Turbines  

SciTech Connect

This paper summarizes the work completed under the CRADA between NREL and American Superconductor (AMSC). The CRADA combined NREL and AMSC resources to benchmark high temperature superconducting direct drive (HTSDD) generator technology by integrating the technologies into a conceptual wind turbine design, and comparing the design to geared drive and permanent magnet direct drive (PMDD) wind turbine configurations. Analysis was accomplished by upgrading the NREL Wind Turbine Design Cost and Scaling Model to represent geared and PMDD turbines at machine ratings up to 10 MW and then comparing cost and mass figures of AMSC's HTSDD wind turbine designs to theoretical geared and PMDD turbine designs at 3.1, 6, and 10 MW sizes. Based on the cost and performance data supplied by AMSC, HTSDD technology has good potential to compete successfully as an alternative technology to PMDD and geared technology turbines in the multi megawatt classes. In addition, data suggests the economics of HTSDD turbines improve with increasing size, although several uncertainties remain for all machines in the 6 to 10 MW class.

Maples, B.; Hand, M.; Musial, W.

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

A Conceptual Multi-Megawatt System Based on a Tungsten CERMET Reactor  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Abstract. A conceptual reactor system to support Multi-Megawatt Nuclear Electric Propulsion is investigated within this paper. The reactor system consists of a helium cooled Tungsten-UN fission core, surrounded by a beryllium neutron reflector and 13 B4C control drums coupled to a high temperature Brayton power conversion system. Excess heat is rejected via carbon reinforced heat pipe radiators and the gamma and neutron flux is attenuated via segmented shielding consisting of lithium hydride and tungsten layers. Turbine inlet temperatures ranging from 1300 K to 1500 K are investigated for their effects on specific powers and net electrical outputs ranging from 1 MW to 100 MW. The reactor system is estimated to have a mass, which ranges from 15 Mt at 1 MWe and a turbine inlet temperature of 1500 K to 1200 Mt at 100 MWe and a turbine temperature of 1300 K. The reactor systems specific mass ranges from 32 kg/kWe at a turbine inlet temperature of 1300 K and a power of 1 MWe to 9.5 kg/kW at a turbine temperature of 1500 K and a power of 100 MWe.

Jonathan A. Webb; Brian Gross

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

95

Robust Controller Design for Simultaneous Control of Throttle Pressure and Megawatt Output in a Power Plant Unit  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Recently proposed (( and (-synthesis controller design methodologies permit the design of high-performance control systems for plants that are difficult to model accurately. The work summarized in this report assesses the benefits of the (( and (-synthesis controllers for the simultaneous control of throttle pressure and megawatt output in a power plant unit, while also serving to clarify the (( and (-synthesis design methods by an example.

1999-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

96

eGRID2007 Version 1.1 - All Files | OpenEI  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

eGRID2007 Version 1.1 - All Files eGRID2007 Version 1.1 - All Files Dataset Summary Description The Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) is a comprehensive inventory of environmental attributes of electric power systems. The preeminent source of air emissions data for the electric power sector, eGRID is based on available plant-specific data for all U.S. electricity generating plants that provide power to the electric grid and report data to the U.S. government. eGRID integrates many different federal data sources on power plants and power companies, from three different federal agencies: EPA, the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Emissions data from EPA are carefully integrated with generation data from EIA to produce useful values like pounds per megawatt-hour (lb/MWh) of emissions, which allows direct comparison of the environmental attributes of electricity generation. eGRID also provides aggregated data by state, U.S. total, company, and by three different sets of electric grid boundaries.This particular distribution consists of a single zip file that contains all available eGrid 2007 spreadsheet files, state import-export files, Technical Support Documents, Summary Tables, GHG output emission rates, the EUEC2010 paper, and graphical representations of eGRID subregions and NERC regions maps.

97

Why the June price spike was not a fluke  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Generation and capacity shortages are being exacerbated by the slowness of the deregulation process. Most at risk are companies that are not well structured to function in the wholesale power industry or who have mistaken apparent regulatory inaction for an indication of the low risk of shortages and high prices. There are many who would like to believe that the high wholesale power prices that were seen in the Midwest in June 1998 were one-time occurrences, but this is not likely to be the case. Regulators and others often find this truth so difficult to accept that they choose a combination of hope for reasonable weather and outright denial. One measure of the shortage is that the reported 1998 peak price of $7,000 per megawatt-hour (MWh) was so high that, were it to prevail even for 48 hours, a new combustion turbine could be fully paid off. In other words, any net revenues during the remaining 8,712 hours of the first year that the combustion turbine comes on line and of the rest of the plant`s multidecade life would be pure profit. Another measure is that many parts of the country are poised to join Colorado and Alberta in the rolling blackout-due-to-capacity-shortfall club.

Rose, J.L. [ICF Kaiser International Inc., Fairfax, VA (United States)

1998-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

Impact of Wind Energy on Hourly Load Following Requirements: An Hourly and Seasonal Analysis; Preprint  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The impacts of wind energy on the power system grid can be decomposed into several time scales that include regulation, load following, and unit commitment. Techniques for evaluating the impacts on these time scales are still evolving, and as wind energy becomes a larger part of the electricity supply, valuable experience will be gained that will help refine these methods. Studies that estimated the impact of wind in the load following time scale found differing results and costs, ranging from near zero to approximately $2.50/megawatt-hour (MWh). Part of the reason for these differences is the different interpretation of the impacts that would be allocated to this ancillary service. Because of the low correlation between changes in load and wind, long-term analyses of the load following impact of wind may find low impacts. During the daily load cycle, there is a tremendous variability in load following requirements in systems without wind. When significant levels of wind generation are added to the resource mix, relatively small changes in wind output can complicate the task of balancing the system during periods of large load swings. This paper analyzes the load following impacts of wind by segregating these critical time periods of the day and separating the analysis by season. The analysis compares wind generation at geographically dispersed sites to wind generation based primarily at a single site, and for a large penetration of wind (more than 20% wind capacity to peak load).

Krich, A.; Milligan, M.

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

Sensitivity Analysis of Offshore Wind Cost of Energy (Poster)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

No matter the source, offshore wind energy plant cost estimates are significantly higher than for land-based projects. For instance, a National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) review on the 2010 cost of wind energy found baseline cost estimates for onshore wind energy systems to be 71 dollars per megawatt-hour ($/MWh), versus 225 $/MWh for offshore systems. There are many ways that innovation can be used to reduce the high costs of offshore wind energy. However, the use of such innovation impacts the cost of energy because of the highly coupled nature of the system. For example, the deployment of multimegawatt turbines can reduce the number of turbines, thereby reducing the operation and maintenance (O&M) costs associated with vessel acquisition and use. On the other hand, larger turbines may require more specialized vessels and infrastructure to perform the same operations, which could result in higher costs. To better understand the full impact of a design decision on offshore wind energy system performance and cost, a system analysis approach is needed. In 2011-2012, NREL began development of a wind energy systems engineering software tool to support offshore wind energy system analysis. The tool combines engineering and cost models to represent an entire offshore wind energy plant and to perform system cost sensitivity analysis and optimization. Initial results were collected by applying the tool to conduct a sensitivity analysis on a baseline offshore wind energy system using 5-MW and 6-MW NREL reference turbines. Results included information on rotor diameter, hub height, power rating, and maximum allowable tip speeds.

Dykes, K.; Ning, A.; Graf, P.; Scott, G.; Damiami, R.; Hand, M.; Meadows, R.; Musial, W.; Moriarty, P.; Veers, P.

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

Water Power for a Clean Energy Future (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This fact sheet provides an overview of the U.S. Department of Energy's Wind and Water Power Program's water power research activities. Water power is the nation's largest source of clean, domestic, renewable energy. Harnessing energy from rivers, manmade waterways, and oceans to generate electricity for the nation's homes and businesses can help secure America's energy future. Water power technologies fall into two broad categories: conventional hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic technologies. Conventional hydropower facilities include run-of-the-river, storage, and pumped storage. Most conventional hydropower plants use a diversion structure, such as a dam, to capture water's potential energy via a turbine for electricity generation. Marine and hydrokinetic technologies obtain energy from waves, tides, ocean currents, free-flowing rivers, streams and ocean thermal gradients to generate electricity. The United States has abundant water power resources, enough to meet a large portion of the nation's electricity demand. Conventional hydropower generated 257 million megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity in 2010 and provides 6-7% of all electricity in the United States. According to preliminary estimates from the Electric Power Resource Institute (EPRI), the United States has additional water power resource potential of more than 85,000 megawatts (MW). This resource potential includes making efficiency upgrades to existing hydroelectric facilities, developing new low-impact facilities, and using abundant marine and hydrokinetic energy resources. EPRI research suggests that ocean wave and in-stream tidal energy production potential is equal to about 10% of present U.S. electricity consumption (about 400 terrawatt-hours per year). The greatest of these resources is wave energy, with the most potential in Hawaii, Alaska, and the Pacific Northwest. The Department of Energy's (DOE's) Water Power Program works with industry, universities, other federal agencies, and DOE's national laboratories to promote the development and deployment of technologies capable of generating environmentally sustainable and cost-effective electricity from the nation's water resources.

Not Available

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

"YEAR","MONTH","STATE","UTILITY CODE","UTILITY NAME","RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY (MWh)","COMMERCIAL TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITYFOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","RESIDENTIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","COMMERCIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INDUSTRIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","TRANSPORTATION INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","RESIDENTIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","COMMERCIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","INDUSTRIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","TRANSPORTATION NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

UTILITYFOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","RESIDENTIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","COMMERCIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INDUSTRIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","TRANSPORTATION INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","RESIDENTIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","COMMERCIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","INDUSTRIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","TRANSPORTATION NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED"

102

"YEAR","MONTH","STATE","UTILITY CODE","UTILITY NAME","RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL PHOTOVOLTAIC NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL WIND ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL WIND INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL WIND NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","COMMERCIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL OTHER ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL OTHER INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL OTHER NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY (MWh)","COMMERCIAL TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK (MWh)","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","COMMERCIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","TOTAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY (MW)","RESIDENTIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","COMMERCIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","INDUSTRIAL TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TRANSPORTATION TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","TOTAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT","RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","TOTAL ELECTRIC ENERGY SOLD BACK TO THE UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","RESIDENTIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","COMMERCIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INDUSTRIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","TRANSPORTATION INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","RESIDENTIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","COMMERCIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","INDUSTRIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","TRANSPORTATION NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

UTILITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MWh)","RESIDENTIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","COMMERCIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INDUSTRIAL INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","TRANSPORTATION INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","INSTALLED NET METERING CAPACITY FOR ALL STATES SERVED(MW)","RESIDENTIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","COMMERCIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","INDUSTRIAL NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","TRANSPORTATION NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED","NET METERING CUSTOMER COUNT FOR ALL STATES SERVED"

103

Table 11.6 Installed Nameplate Capacity of Fossil-Fuel Steam-Electric Generators With Environmental Equipment, 1985-2010 (Megawatts)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Installed Nameplate Capacity of Fossil-Fuel Steam-Electric Generators With Environmental Equipment," Installed Nameplate Capacity of Fossil-Fuel Steam-Electric Generators With Environmental Equipment," " 1985-2010 (Megawatts)" "Year","Coal",,,,"Petroleum and Natural Gas",,,,"Total 1" ,,,"Flue Gas","Total 2",,,"Flue Gas","Total 2",,,"Flue Gas","Total 2" ,"Particulate","Cooling","Desulfurization",,"Particulate","Cooling","Desulfurization",,"Particulate","Cooling","Desulfurization" ,"Collectors","Towers","(Scrubbers)",,"Collectors","Towers","(Scrubbers)",,"Collectors","Towers","(Scrubbers)"

104

Cleaning Up Four Megawatts  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A utility asked the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) to conduct an energy assessment of a manufacturer of cleaning products in their service area. Working with facility personnel and the utility, the EPRI energy audit team endeavored to understand energy usage in the facility and to identify areas where energy could be saved. The energy audit occurred in a facility located in the U.S. Midwest during the summer season. It was an older facility and was, for the most part, not air-conditioned. The a...

2012-04-09T23:59:59.000Z

105

Estimation of Annual Reductions of NOx Emissions in ERCOT for the HB3693 Electricity Savings Goals  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Increasing the level of energy efficiency in Texas, as proposed by House Bill 3693, an Act related to energy demand, energy load, energy efficiency incentives, energy programs and energy performance measures, would reduce the amount of electricity demanded from Texas utilities. Since approximately eighty-eight percent of electricity generated in Texas is from plants powered by fossil fuels, such as coal and natural gas, this decrease would also reduce the air pollution that would otherwise be associated with burning these fuels. This report presents the potential emission reductions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) that would occur in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) region if new energy efficiency targets for investor owned utilities are established for 2010 and 2015. These energy efficiency targets are the subject of a feasibility study as prescribed by Texas House Bill 3693. This report describes the details of the methodology, data and assumptions used, and presents the results of the analysis. The total energy savings targets for utilities within ERCOT are 745,710 megawatt-hours (MWh) by 2010 under the 30 percent reduction of growth scenario and 1,788,953 MWh by 2015 under the 50 percent reduction of growth scenario. The total projected annual NOx emissions reductions from these electricity savings are 191 tons in 2010 and 453 tons in 2015, or converting the annual totals into average daily avoided emissions totals, 0.5 tons per day by 2010 and 1.25 tons per day by 2015. The average avoided emission rate is approximately 0.51 pounds (lb) of NOx reduced per MWh of electricity savings. While House Bill 3693 is an Act related to energy and does not target emissions levels, the energy efficiency improvements would achieve air pollution benefits that could positively affect air quality and human health. The emissions reductions projected to result in 2010 and 2015 are comparable to the Texas Emission Reduction Program (TERP) Energy-Efficiency Grants Program, which does target emission reductions and estimated 2005 annual NOx emissions reductions of about 89 tons. While the projected emissions reductions are small compared to the total emission reductions needed to bring the states non-attainment areas into attainment of the national ambient air quality standards for ozone, they can be a part of an overall strategy to reduce emissions and improve human health in Texas.

Diem, Art; Mulholland, Denise; Yarbrough, James; Baltazar, Juan Carlos; Im, Piljae; Haberl, Jeff

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

PowerPoint Presentation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

US Army Corps of Engineers US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® ® Dan Brueggenjohann - Project Manager Programs & Project Management Division Tulsa District 14 June 2011 Webbers Falls and Ozark Powerhouse Major Rehabilitation Briefing for 2011 Southwestern Federal Hydropower Conference BUILDING STRONG ® 2 McClellan-Kerr Navigation Project Webbers Falls BUILDING STRONG ® * Run of River Plants * Webbers - 69 MW from three inclined axis units (23 MW each) which were placed in service in 1973. Average annual energy production is 213,000 Megawatt-hours. * Ozark - 115 MW from five inclined axis units (23 MW each) which were placed in service in 1974. Average annual energy production is 429,000 Megawatt -hours. Background BUILDING STRONG ® * Project Scope: Rehabilitation of the Webbers

107

Audit Report: OAS-M-12-04 | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2-04 2-04 Audit Report: OAS-M-12-04 April 30, 2012 The Department of Energy's Renewable Energy Efforts In an effort to promote generation of renewable energy, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) requires that by Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 at least 7.5 percent of a Federal agency's annual electricity consumption be from renewable sources. Because of the importance of the Department of Energy's (Department) commitment to sustainability, we initiated this audit to determine whether the Department was effectively meeting the EPAct renewable energy requirements. In FY 2010, the Department acquired approximately 461,000 megawatt hours from renewable sources, representing over 9 percent of its annual electricity consumption of 4.8 million megawatt hours. Although the Department's progress exceeded EPAct

108

Amine Scrubbing for CO{sub 2} Capture  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Amine scrubbing has been used to separate carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) from natural gas and hydrogen since 1930. It is a robust technology and is ready to be tested and used on a larger scale for CO{sub 2} capture from coal-fired power plants. The minimum work requirement to separate CO{sub 2} from coal-fired flue gas and compress CO{sub 2} to 150 bar is 0.11 megawatt-hours per metric ton of CO{sub 2}. Process and solvent improvements should reduce the energy consumption to 0.2 megawatt-hour per ton of CO{sub 2}. Other advanced technologies will not provide energy-efficient or timely solutions to CO{sub 2} emission from conventional coal-fired power plants.

Rochelle, G.T. [University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (United States). Dept. of Chemical Engineering

2009-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

109

Strategic Intelligence Update: Distributed Generation & Energy Storage, 1st Newsletter  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2008-06-11T23:59:59.000Z

110

DG & ES Strategic Intelligence Update newsletters 1 - 4  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Strategic Intelligence Update  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2008-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

112

Compressed Air Energy Storage State-of-Science  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Reliable and cost-effective bulk energy storage (BES) will become an important part of the electricity grid. In the form of compressed air energy storage (CAES), BES is a cost-effective option for applications requiring hundreds of megawatt-hours of energy storage. Experience in Alabama and Germany has shown that an optimized CAES plant design can further improve plant capital costs, economics, and performance. Advanced CAES technologies can defer expensive upgrades and capital purchases for transmission...

2009-10-27T23:59:59.000Z

113

Strategic Intelligence Update: Distributed Generation & Energy Storage, December 2008  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2008-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

114

Strategic Intelligence Update  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2009-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

115

Strategic Intelligence Update: Energy Storage & Distributed Generation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2009-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

116

Strategic Intelligence Update: Distributed Generation & Energy Storage  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2009-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

117

Strategic Intelligence Update: Energy Storage & Distributed Generation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2009-06-22T23:59:59.000Z

118

Strategic Intelligence Update: Distributed Generation & Energy Storage  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2009-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

119

Strategic Intelligence Update  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Distributed generation and energy storage technologies add value to a wide range of applications within the electric utility enterprise. Energy storage at megawatt-hour scales can be used to enable generators to better follow load and stabilize transmission voltage and frequency. Both distributed generation and energy storage systems can help utilities shift and manage peak loads within the distribution system, improve reliability, and potentially help defer infrastructure upgrades. Bulk energy storage e...

2008-10-16T23:59:59.000Z

120

Multi-Megawatt Organic Rankine Engine power plant (MORE). Phase IA final report: system design of MORE power plant for industrial energy conservation emphasizing the cement industry  

SciTech Connect

The Multi-Megawatt Organic Rankine Engine (MORE) program is directed towards the development of a large, organic Rankine power plant for energy conservation from moderate temperature industrial heat streams. Organic Rankine power plants are ideally suited for use with heat sources in the temperature range below 1100/sup 0/F. Cement manufacture was selected as the prototype industry for the MORE system because of the range of parameters which can be tested in a cement application. This includes process exit temperatures of 650/sup 0/F to 1110/sup 0/F for suspension preheater and long dry kilns, severe dust loading, multi-megawatt power generation potential, and boiler exhaust gas acid dew point variations. The work performed during the Phase IA System Design contract period is described. The System Design task defines the complete MORE system and its installation to the level necessary to obtain detailed performance maps, equipment specifications, planning of supporting experiments, and credible construction and hardware cost estimates. The MORE power plant design is based upon installation in the Black Mountain Quarry Cement Plant near Victorville, California.

Bair, E.K.; Breindel, B.; Collamore, F.N.; Hodgson, J.N.; Olson, G.K.

1980-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

TMCC WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

North Dakota has an outstanding resource--providing more available wind for development than any other state. According to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) studies, North Dakota alone has enough energy from good wind areas, those of wind power Class 4 and higher, to supply 36% of the 1990 electricity consumption of the entire lower 48 states. At present, no more than a handful of wind turbines in the 60- to 100-kilowatt (kW) range are operating in the state. The first two utility-scale turbines were installed in North Dakota as part of a green pricing program, one in early 2002 and the second in July 2002. Both turbines are 900-kW wind turbines. Two more wind turbines are scheduled for installation by another utility later in 2002. Several reasons are evident for the lack of wind development. One primary reason is that North Dakota has more lignite coal than any other state. A number of relatively new minemouth power plants are operating in the state, resulting in an abundance of low-cost electricity. In 1998, North Dakota generated approximately 8.2 million megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity, largely from coal-fired plants. Sales to North Dakota consumers totaled only 4.5 million MWh. In addition, the average retail cost of electricity in North Dakota was 5.7 cents per kWh in 1998. As a result of this surplus and the relatively low retail cost of service, North Dakota is a net exporter of electricity, selling approximately 50% to 60% of the electricity produced in North Dakota to markets outside the state. Keeping in mind that new electrical generation will be considered an export commodity to be sold outside the state, the transmission grid that serves to export electricity from North Dakota is at or close to its ability to serve new capacity. The markets for these resources are outside the state, and transmission access to the markets is a necessary condition for any large project. At the present time, technical assessments of the transmission network indicate that the ability to add and carry wind capacity outside of the state is limited. Identifying markets, securing long-term contracts, and obtaining a transmission path to export the power are all major steps that must be taken to develop new projects in North Dakota.

Turtle Mountain Community College

2003-12-30T23:59:59.000Z

122

RECOVERY AND UTILIZATION OF COALMINE METHANE: PILOT-SCALE DEMONSTRATION PHASE  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A fuel cell demonstration was conducted on coalmine methane to demonstrate the utilization of methane emissions associated with underground coal mining operations in a carbonate Direct FuelCell{reg_sign} (DFC{reg_sign}) power plant. FuelCell Energy (FCE) conducted the demonstration with support from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and in cooperation with Northwest Fuel Development, the operator of the Rose Valley test site in Hopedale, Ohio. The fuel cell power plant, a first generation sub megawatt power plant, was operated on CMM between August 1, 2003 and December 13, 2003. The direct fuel cell operated on low-Btu CMM with 42% methane content and achieved performance levels comparable to natural gas on a Btu feed basis. During this period 1456 hours on-load operation was achieved. The total power generated using CMM was 134 megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity. The power generated was connected to the American Electric Power grid by a 69-kilovolt (kV) transformer. The maximum power level achieved was 140 kW. Efficiency of power generation was 40% based on the lower heating value (LHV) of the CMM. Compression and drying of the CMM resulted in additional parasitic load, which reduced the overall efficiency to 36 % LHV. In future applications, on-board compression and utilization of the saturated CMM without drying will be investigated in order to reduce the auxiliary power requirements. By comparison, the internal combustion engines operating on CMM at the Hopedale site operate at an over efficiency of 20%. The over-all efficiency for the fuel cell is therefore 80% higher than the internal combustion engine (36% vs. 20%). Future operation of a 250 kW Fuel Cell Power Plant on CMM will utilize 18,400,000 cubic feet of methane per year. This will be equivalent to: (a) avoiding 7428 metric tons of CO{sub 2} emissions, (b) avoiding 16.4 million pounds of CO{sub 2} emissions, (c) removing 1640 cars off the road for one year, (d) heating 267 households for 1 year, (e) planting 2234 acres of trees. Based on the results obtained in this demonstration it can be concluded that utilization of fuel cells to mitigate CMM emissions is an attractive option that can be utilized to generate power at high efficiencies and with very low emissions.

George Steinfeld; Jennifer Hunt

2004-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

123

Suppression of spurious mode oscillation in mega-watt 77-GHz gyrotron as a high quality probe beam source for the collective Thomson scattering in LHD  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Collective Thomson scattering (CTS) diagnostic requires a strong probing beam to diagnose a bulk and fast ion distribution function in fusion plasmas. A mega-watt gyrotron for electron cyclotron resonance heating is used as a probing beam in the large helical device. Spurious mode oscillations are often observed during the turning on/off phase of the modulation. The frequency spectra of the 77-GHz gyrotron output power have been measured, and then one of the spurious modes, which interferes with the CTS receiver system, is identified as the TE{sub 17,6} mode at the frequency of 74.7 GHz. The mode competition calculation indicates that the increase of the magnetic field strength at the gyrotron resonator can avoid such a spurious mode and excite only the main TE{sub 18,6} mode. The spurious radiation at the 74.7 GHz is experimentally demonstrated to be suppressed in the stronger magnetic field than that optimized for the high-power operation.

Ogasawara, S. [Department of Energy Engineering and Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8463 (Japan); Kubo, S. [Department of Energy Engineering and Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8463 (Japan); National Institute for Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki-shi 509-5292 (Japan); Nishiura, M.; Tanaka, K.; Shimozuma, T.; Yoshimura, Y.; Igami, H.; Takahashi, H.; Ito, S.; Takita, Y.; Kobayashi, S.; Mizuno, Y.; Okada, K. [National Institute for Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki-shi 509-5292 (Japan); Tatematsu, Y.; Saito, T. [Research Center for Development of Far-Infrared Region, University of Fukui, Fukui 910-8507 (Japan); Minami, R.; Kariya, T.; Imai, T. [Plasma Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577 (Japan)

2012-10-15T23:59:59.000Z

124

Lessons from Iowa : development of a 270 megawatt compressed air energy storage project in midwest Independent System Operator : a study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Iowa Stored Energy Park was an innovative, 270 Megawatt, $400 million compressed air energy storage (CAES) project proposed for in-service near Des Moines, Iowa, in 2015. After eight years in development the project was terminated because of site geological limitations. However, much was learned in the development process regarding what it takes to do a utility-scale, bulk energy storage facility and coordinate it with regional renewable wind energy resources in an Independent System Operator (ISO) marketplace. Lessons include the costs and long-term economics of a CAES facility compared to conventional natural gas-fired generation alternatives; market, legislative, and contract issues related to enabling energy storage in an ISO market; the importance of due diligence in project management; and community relations and marketing for siting of large energy projects. Although many of the lessons relate to CAES applications in particular, most of the lessons learned are independent of site location or geology, or even the particular energy storage technology involved.

Holst, Kent (Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency, Traer, IA); Huff, Georgianne; Schulte, Robert H. (Schulte Associates LLC, Northfield, MN); Critelli, Nicholas (Critelli Law Office PC, Des Moines, IA)

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

125

Dirty kilowatts: America's most polluting power plants  

SciTech Connect

In 2006, the US EPA tracked more than 1,400 fossil-fired power plants of varying sizes through its Acid Rain Program. This report ranks each of the 378 largest plants (generating at least 2 million megawatt-hours in 2006) for which both the most recent EPA emissions data and Energy Information Administration (EIA) electric generation data are available. The report ranks each plant based on emission rates, or pounds of pollutant for each megawatt-hour (or million megawatt-hours, in the case of mercury) the plant produced. It ranks the top fifty power plants polluters for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon dioxide, and mercury. A complete listing of all 378 plants is included as Appendix A. Appendix B contains overheads of an NETL presentation: Tracking new coal-fired power plants - coal's resurgence in electric power generation, 24 January 2007. The 12 states with the heaviest concentrations of the dirtiest power plants, in terms of total tons of carbon dioxide emitted, are: Texas (five, including two of the top 10 dirtiest plants); Pennsylvania (four); Indiana (four, including two of the top 10 dirtiest plants); Alabama (three); Georgia (three, including two of the top three dirtiest plants); North Carolina (three); Ohio (three); West Virginia (three); Wyoming (two); Florida (two); Kentucky (two); and New Mexico (two). Carbon dioxide emissions from power plants are now at roughly 2.5 billion tons per year. Power plants are responsible for about 30%-40% of all man-made CO{sub 2} emissions in the USA. Power plants, especially those that burn coal, are by far the largest single contributor of SO{sub 2} pollution in the United States. Power plant mercury emissions remain steady as compared to previous years. A searchable database ranking 378 U.S. power plants on carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and mercury pollution is available online at http://www.dirtykilowatts.org. 22 refs., 8 tabs., 2 apps.

NONE

2007-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

126

International Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets (Presentation)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This presentation provides an overview of international voluntary renewable energy markets, with a focus on the United States and Europe. The voluntary renewable energy market is the market in which consumers and institutions purchase renewable energy to match their electricity needs on a voluntary basis. In 2010, the U.S. voluntary market was estimated at 35 terawatt-hours (TWh) compared to 300 TWh in the European market, though key differences exist. On a customer basis, Australia has historically had the largest number of customers, pricing for voluntary certificates remains low, at less than $1 megawatt-hour, though prices depend on technology.

Heeter, J.

2012-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Designing an ultrasupercritical steam turbine  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Carbon emissions produced by the combustion of coal may be collected and stored in the future, but a better approach is to reduce the carbon produced through efficient combustion technologies. Increasing the efficiency of new plants using ultrasupercritical (USC) technology will net less carbon released per megawatt-hour using the world's abundant coal reserves while producing electricity at the lowest possible cost. The article shows how increasing the steam turbine operating conditions for a new USC project in the USA and quantify the potential CO{sub 2} reduction this advanced design makes possible. 7 figs., 3 tabs.

Klotz, H.; Davis, K.; Pickering, E. [Alstom (Germany)

2009-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

128

Technology disrupted  

SciTech Connect

Three years ago, the author presented a report on power generation technologies which in summary said 'no technology available today has the potential of becoming transformational or disruptive in the next five to ten years'. In 2006 the company completed another strategic view research report covering the electric power, oil, gas and unconventional energy industries and manufacturing industry. This article summarises the strategic view findings and then revisits some of the scenarios presented in 2003. The cost per megawatt-hour of the alternatives is given for plants ordered in 2005 and then in 2025. The issue of greenhouse gas regulation is dealt with through carbon sequestration and carbon allowances or an equivalent carbon tax. Results reveal substantial variability through nuclear power, hydro, wind, geothermal and biomass remain competitive through every scenario. Greenhouse gas scenario analysis shows coal still be viable, albeit less competitive against nuclear and renewable technologies. A carbon tax or allowance at $24 per metric ton has the same effect on IGCC cost as a sequestration mandate. However, the latter would hurt gas plants much more than a tax or allowance. Sequestering CO{sub 2} from a gas plant is almost as costly per megawatt-hour as for coal. 5 refs., 5 figs., 5 tabs.

Papatheodorou, Y. [CH2M Hill (United States)

2007-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

129

Low Wind Speed Turbine Project Phase II: The Application of Medium-Voltage Electrical Apparatus to the Class of Variable Speed Multi-Megawatt Low Wind Speed Turbines; 15 June 2004--30 April 2005  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Kilowatt ratings of modern wind turbines have progressed rapidly from 50 kW to 1,800 kW over the past 25 years, with 3.0- to 7.5-MW turbines expected in the next 5 years. The premise of this study is simple: The rapid growth of wind turbine power ratings and the corresponding growth in turbine electrical generation systems and associated controls are quickly making low-voltage (LV) electrical design approaches cost-ineffective. This report provides design detail and compares the cost of energy (COE) between commercial LV-class wind power machines and emerging medium-voltage (MV)-class multi-megawatt wind technology. The key finding is that a 2.5% reduction in the COE can be achieved by moving from LV to MV systems. This is a conservative estimate, with a 3% to 3.5% reduction believed to be attainable once purchase orders to support a 250-turbine/year production level are placed. This evaluation considers capital costs as well as installation, maintenance, and training requirements for wind turbine maintenance personnel. Subsystems investigated include the generator, pendant cables, variable-speed converter, and padmount transformer with switchgear. Both current-source and voltage-source converter/inverter MV topologies are compared against their low-voltage, voltage-source counterparts at the 3.0-, 5.0-, and 7.5-MW levels.

Erdman, W.; Behnke, M.

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

71 - 20480 of 31,917 results. 71 - 20480 of 31,917 results. Article Nellis Air Force Base solar array provides model for renewable projects A public-private partnership has helped one Air Force base reduce its energy costs and convert to 25 percent renewable energy. Nellis Air Force Base, just north of Las Vegas, took a big step in 2007 when it installed a 14.2-megawatt, 70,000-panel photovoltaic solar array that reduced carbon dioxide emissions by 24,000 tons a year. Built partly on a landfill, the field of solar panels takes advantage of two resources plentiful in Nevada: sunshine and empty land. At its unveiling in December of 2007, the Nellis array was the largest solar panel installation in North America. The project was originally expected to produce about 30,000 megawatt-hours of electricity per year,

131

The design and testing of a molten salt steam generator for solar application  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes the design and testing of the Steam Generator Subsystem (SGS) for the Molten Salt Electric Experiment at Sandia Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The Molten Salt Electric Experiment (MSEE) has been established to demonstrate the feasibility of the molten salt central receiver concept. The experiment is capable of generating 0.75 megawatts of electric power from solar energy, with the capability of storing seven megawatt-hours of thermal energy. The steam generator subsystem transfers sensible heat from the solar-heated molten nitrate salt to produce steam to drive a conventional turbine. This paper discusses the design requirements dictated by the steam generator application and also reviews the process conditions. Details of each of the SGS components are given, featuring the aspects of the design and performance unique to the solar application. The paper concludes with a summary of the test results confirming the overall design of the subsystem.

Allman, W.A.; Smith, D.C.; Kakarala, C.R.

1988-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Southern California Edison 32MWh Wind Integration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, Southern California Edison , Southern California Edison Tehachapi Wind Energy Storage (TSP) Project Loïc Gaillac, Naum Pinsky Southern California Edison November 3, 2010 Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy through National Energy Technology Laboratory 2 © Copyright 2010, Southern California Edison Outline * Policy Challenges - The challenge/opportunity * Testing a Solution: Tehachapi Storage Project Overview - Description of the project & objectives - Operational uses - Conceptual layout 3 © Copyright 2010, Southern California Edison CA 2020: Energy Policy Initiatives Highlighting potential areas for storage applications: * High penetration of Solar and Wind generation - Executive order requiring 33% of generated electricity to come from

133

Reference Designs of 50 MW / 250 MWh Energy Storage Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Electric utilities are interested energy storage solutions for renewable integration and transmission and distribution (TD) grid support that require systems of 10's of MWs in scale and energy durations of longer than 4 hours. Compressed air energy storage and pumped hydro systems are currently the lowest capital cost (/ kW-h) bulk storage options for energy durations longer than 10 hour; however, these storage facilities have geological and siting restrictions and require long permitting and deployment ...

2010-12-16T23:59:59.000Z

134

Southern California Edison 32MWh Wind Integration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Southern California Edison November 3, 2010 Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy through National Energy Technology...

135

Nanocrystalline Magnetic Components for Megawatt Scale High ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Symposium, Advanced Materials for Power Electronics, Power Conditioning, and ... This scaling does not typically incur higher losses in the nancrystalline ... that will efficiently integrate into the next generation power grid distribution network.

136

Proceedings of the High Megawatt Converter Workshop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... that would support production of the SOFC stacks in ... power plants and the limited market size. ... The inverter issues for DOD markets are somewhat ...

2012-05-02T23:59:59.000Z

137

Proceedings of the High Megawatt Power Converter ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... State Energy Conversion Alliance SOFC Solid Oxide ... economic value to specific market segments? ... attributes that would serve multiple markets? ...

2012-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

Proceedings of the High Megawatt Power Converter ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... in delivering electricity at fair prices, carbon-emission ... Secure, Reliable, Efficient Energy, Home Station to ... Oil age is finite (cost, supply, security, ...

2012-03-07T23:59:59.000Z

139

2007 High-Megawatt Converter Workshop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... window. The multiple window format is controlled using the Windows pull down menu on the Acrobat Reader Toolbar. ...

2013-04-26T23:59:59.000Z

140

Adaptive control system for pulsed megawatt klystrons  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

The invention provides an arrangement for reducing waveform errors such as errors in phase or amplitude in output pulses produced by pulsed power output devices such as klystrons by generating an error voltage representing the extent of error still present in the trailing edge of the previous output pulse, using the error voltage to provide a stored control voltage, and applying the stored control voltage to the pulsed power output device to limit the extent of error in the leading edge of the next output pulse.

Bolie, Victor W. (Albuquerque, NM)

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nevada" Nevada" "NERC Region(s)",,"WECC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Gas" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",11421,34 " Electric Utilities",8713,29 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",2708,33 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",35146248,38 " Electric Utilities",23710917,34 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",11435331,29 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",7,44 " Nitrogen Oxide",15,40 " Carbon Dioxide",17020,38 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",0.4,46 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1,37 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1068,37 "Total Retail Sales (megawatthours)",33772595,33

142

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Georgia" Georgia" "NERC Region(s)",,"SERC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",36636,7 " Electric Utilities",26639,3 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",9998,11 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",137576941,8 " Electric Utilities",120425913,4 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",17151028,21 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",265,5 " Nitrogen Oxide",79,10 " Carbon Dioxide",82592,8 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",4.2,10 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.3,28 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1324,25

143

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Tennessee" Tennessee" "NERC Region(s)",,"RFC/SERC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",21417,19 " Electric Utilities",20968,11 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",450,49 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",82348625,19 " Electric Utilities",79816049,15 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",2532576,45 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",138,13 " Nitrogen Oxide",33,31 " Carbon Dioxide",48196,18 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",3.7,14 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",0.9,40 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1290,26

144

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dakota" Dakota" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO/WECC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Hydroelectric" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",3623,45 " Electric Utilities",2994,37 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",629,48 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",10049636,46 " Electric Utilities",8682448,36 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",1367188,47 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",12,43 " Nitrogen Oxide",12,43 " Carbon Dioxide",3611,47 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2.6,23 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",2.6,8 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",792,41

145

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Texas" Texas" "NERC Region(s)",,"SERC/SPP/TRE/WECC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Gas" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",108258,1 " Electric Utilities",26533,4 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",81724,1 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",411695046,1 " Electric Utilities",95099161,9 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",316595885,1 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",430,2 " Nitrogen Oxide",204,1 " Carbon Dioxide",251409,1 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2.3,28 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.1,32 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1346,22

146

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Wyoming" Wyoming" "NERC Region(s)",,"WECC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",7986,37 " Electric Utilities",6931,31 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",1056,41 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",48119254,31 " Electric Utilities",44738543,25 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",3380711,42 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",67,23 " Nitrogen Oxide",61,15 " Carbon Dioxide",45703,21 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",3.1,19 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",2.8,7 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2094,2

147

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Wisconsin" Wisconsin" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO/RFC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",17836,23 " Electric Utilities",13098,19 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",4738,20 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",64314067,24 " Electric Utilities",45579970,22 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",18734097,18 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",145,12 " Nitrogen Oxide",49,25 " Carbon Dioxide",47238,19 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",5,9 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.7,20 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1619,16

148

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Indiana" Indiana" "NERC Region(s)",,"RFC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",27638,13 " Electric Utilities",23008,8 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",4630,23 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",125180739,11 " Electric Utilities",107852560,5 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",17328179,20 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",385,4 " Nitrogen Oxide",120,4 " Carbon Dioxide",116283,5 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",6.8,4 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",2.1,12 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2048,4

149

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jersey" Jersey" "NERC Region(s)",,"RFC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Nuclear" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",18424,22 " Electric Utilities",460,43 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",17964,6 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",65682494,23 " Electric Utilities",-186385,50 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",65868878,6 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",14,40 " Nitrogen Oxide",15,41 " Carbon Dioxide",19160,37 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",0.5,45 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",0.5,48 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",643,43

150

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Arizona" Arizona" "NERC Region(s)",,"WECC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",26392,15 " Electric Utilities",20115,14 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",6277,16 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",111750957,12 " Electric Utilities",91232664,11 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",20518293,17 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",33,33 " Nitrogen Oxide",57,17 " Carbon Dioxide",55683,15 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",0.7,43 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.1,31 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1099,35

151

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Louisiana" Louisiana" "NERC Region(s)",,"SERC/SPP" "Primary Energy Source",,"Gas" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",26744,14 " Electric Utilities",16471,17 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",10272,10 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",102884940,16 " Electric Utilities",51680682,19 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",51204258,8 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",126,15 " Nitrogen Oxide",75,11 " Carbon Dioxide",58706,14 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2.7,21 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.6,21 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1258,27

152

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Carolina" Carolina" "NERC Region(s)",,"SERC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",27674,12 " Electric Utilities",25553,6 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",2121,34 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",128678483,10 " Electric Utilities",121251138,3 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",7427345,34 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",131,14 " Nitrogen Oxide",57,16 " Carbon Dioxide",73241,13 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2.2,31 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1,34 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1255,28

153

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Idaho" Idaho" "NERC Region(s)",,"WECC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Hydroelectric" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",3990,44 " Electric Utilities",3035,36 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",955,42 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",12024564,44 " Electric Utilities",8589208,37 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",3435356,40 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",7,45 " Nitrogen Oxide",4,48 " Carbon Dioxide",1213,49 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1.2,39 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",0.8,43 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",222,50

154

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nebraska" Nebraska" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO/SPP" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",7857,38 " Electric Utilities",7647,30 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",210,50 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",36630006,36 " Electric Utilities",36242921,30 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",387085,50 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",65,24 " Nitrogen Oxide",40,30 " Carbon Dioxide",24461,34 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",3.9,12 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",2.4,9 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1472,19

155

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Kansas" Kansas" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO/SPP" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",12543,32 " Electric Utilities",11732,20 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",812,45 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",47923762,32 " Electric Utilities",45270047,24 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",2653716,44 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",41,30 " Nitrogen Oxide",46,26 " Carbon Dioxide",36321,26 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1.9,33 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",2.1,13 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1671,14

156

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oregon" Oregon" "NERC Region(s)",,"WECC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Hydroelectric" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",14261,29 " Electric Utilities",10846,27 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",3415,28 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",55126999,27 " Electric Utilities",41142684,26 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",13984316,26 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",16,37 " Nitrogen Oxide",15,42 " Carbon Dioxide",10094,40 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",0.6,44 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",0.6,47 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",404,48

157

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Michigan" Michigan" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO/RFC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",29831,11 " Electric Utilities",21639,10 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",8192,14 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",111551371,13 " Electric Utilities",89666874,13 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",21884497,16 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",254,6 " Nitrogen Oxide",89,6 " Carbon Dioxide",74480,11 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",5,8 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.8,19 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1472,20

158

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Missouri" Missouri" "NERC Region(s)",,"SERC/SPP" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",21739,18 " Electric Utilities",20360,12 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",1378,39 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",92312989,18 " Electric Utilities",90176805,12 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",2136184,46 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",233,8 " Nitrogen Oxide",56,18 " Carbon Dioxide",78815,10 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",5.6,6 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.3,26 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1882,7

159

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

West Virginia" West Virginia" "NERC Region(s)",,"RFC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",16495,24 " Electric Utilities",11719,21 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",4775,19 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",80788947,20 " Electric Utilities",56719755,18 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",24069192,13 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",105,20 " Nitrogen Oxide",49,23 " Carbon Dioxide",74283,12 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2.9,20 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.3,25 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2027,5

160

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

District of Columbia" District of Columbia" "NERC Region(s)",,"RFC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Petroleum" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",790,51 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",790,46 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",199858,51 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",199858,51 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",1,49 " Nitrogen Oxide","*",51 " Carbon Dioxide",191,50 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",8.8,2 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",4,3 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2104,1 "Total Retail Sales (megawatthours)",11876995,43 " Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours)",3388490,50

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Hawaii" Hawaii" "NERC Region(s)",,"--" "Primary Energy Source",,"Petroleum" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",2536,47 " Electric Utilities",1828,40 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",708,47 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",10836036,45 " Electric Utilities",6416068,38 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",4419968,38 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",17,36 " Nitrogen Oxide",21,36 " Carbon Dioxide",8287,42 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",3.4,16 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",4.3,2 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1686,13

162

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Kentucky" Kentucky" "NERC Region(s)",,"RFC/SERC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",20453,21 " Electric Utilities",18945,16 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",1507,38 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",98217658,17 " Electric Utilities",97472144,7 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",745514,48 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",249,7 " Nitrogen Oxide",85,7 " Carbon Dioxide",93160,7 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",5.6,5 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.9,15 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2091,3

163

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oklahoma" Oklahoma" "NERC Region(s)",,"SPP" "Primary Energy Source",,"Gas" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",21022,20 " Electric Utilities",16015,18 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",5006,17 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",72250733,22 " Electric Utilities",57421195,17 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",14829538,24 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",85,21 " Nitrogen Oxide",71,12 " Carbon Dioxide",49536,17 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2.6,24 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",2.2,11 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1512,17

164

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Delaware" Delaware" "NERC Region(s)",,"RFC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Gas" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",3389,46 " Electric Utilities",55,48 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",3334,29 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",5627645,50 " Electric Utilities",30059,46 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",5597586,36 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",13,41 " Nitrogen Oxide",5,47 " Carbon Dioxide",4187,45 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",5.2,7 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.9,16 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1640,15 "Total Retail Sales (megawatthours)",11605932,44

165

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Iowa" Iowa" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO/SERC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",14592,28 " Electric Utilities",11282,24 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",3310,30 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",57508721,26 " Electric Utilities",46188988,21 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",11319733,30 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",108,18 " Nitrogen Oxide",50,22 " Carbon Dioxide",47211,20 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",4.1,11 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.9,14 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1810,10

166

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Florida" Florida" "NERC Region(s)",,"FRCC/SERC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Gas" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",59147,3 " Electric Utilities",50853,1 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",8294,13 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",229095935,3 " Electric Utilities",206062185,1 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",23033750,15 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",160,11 " Nitrogen Oxide",101,5 " Carbon Dioxide",123811,2 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1.5,37 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1,35 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1191,31

167

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Massachusetts" Massachusetts" "NERC Region(s)",,"NPCC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Gas" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",13697,31 " Electric Utilities",937,42 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",12760,8 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",42804824,34 " Electric Utilities",802906,43 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",42001918,10 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",35,31 " Nitrogen Oxide",17,38 " Carbon Dioxide",20291,36 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1.8,34 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",0.9,39 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1045,38

168

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Hampshire" Hampshire" "NERC Region(s)",,"NPCC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Nuclear" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",4180,43 " Electric Utilities",1132,41 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",3048,32 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",22195912,42 " Electric Utilities",3979333,41 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",18216579,19 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",34,32 " Nitrogen Oxide",6,46 " Carbon Dioxide",5551,43 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",3.4,17 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",0.6,46 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",551,47

169

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Alabama" Alabama" "NERC Region(s)",,"SERC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",32417,9 " Electric Utilities",23642,7 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",8775,12 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",152150512,6 " Electric Utilities",122766490,2 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",29384022,12 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",218,10 " Nitrogen Oxide",66,14 " Carbon Dioxide",79375,9 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",3.2,18 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1,36 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1150,33

170

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Minnesota" Minnesota" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",14715,27 " Electric Utilities",11547,22 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",3168,31 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",53670227,29 " Electric Utilities",45428599,23 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",8241628,32 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",57,27 " Nitrogen Oxide",44,27 " Carbon Dioxide",32946,29 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2.3,27 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.8,18 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1353,21

171

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mexico" Mexico" "NERC Region(s)",,"SPP/WECC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",8130,36 " Electric Utilities",6345,33 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",1785,36 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",36251542,37 " Electric Utilities",30848406,33 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",5403136,37 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",15,38 " Nitrogen Oxide",56,19 " Carbon Dioxide",29379,31 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",0.9,42 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",3.4,5 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1787,11

172

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Illinois" Illinois" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO/RFC/SERC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Nuclear" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",44127,5 " Electric Utilities",4800,35 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",39327,3 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",201351872,5 " Electric Utilities",12418332,35 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",188933540,3 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",232,9 " Nitrogen Oxide",83,8 " Carbon Dioxide",103128,6 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",2.5,25 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",0.9,38 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1129,34

173

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Rhode Island" Rhode Island" "NERC Region(s)",,"NPCC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Gas" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",1782,49 " Electric Utilities",7,50 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",1775,37 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",7738719,47 " Electric Utilities",10827,47 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",7727892,33 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide","*",50 " Nitrogen Oxide",3,49 " Carbon Dioxide",3217,48 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)","*",50 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",0.8,42 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",916,39

174

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Alaska" Alaska" "NERC Region(s)",,"--" "Primary Energy Source",,"Gas" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",2067,48 " Electric Utilities",1889,39 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",178,51 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",6759576,48 " Electric Utilities",6205050,40 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",554526,49 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",3,46 " Nitrogen Oxide",16,39 " Carbon Dioxide",4125,46 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1,41 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",5.2,1 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1345,23 "Total Retail Sales (megawatthours)",6247038,50

175

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Pennsylvania" Pennsylvania" "NERC Region(s)",,"RFC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",45575,4 " Electric Utilities",455,44 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",45120,2 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",229752306,2 " Electric Utilities",1086500,42 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",228665806,2 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",387,3 " Nitrogen Oxide",136,2 " Carbon Dioxide",122830,3 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",3.7,13 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.3,27 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1179,32

176

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Montana" Montana" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO/WECC" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",5866,41 " Electric Utilities",2340,38 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",3526,27 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",29791181,41 " Electric Utilities",6271180,39 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",23520001,14 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",22,35 " Nitrogen Oxide",21,35 " Carbon Dioxide",20370,35 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1.6,35 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",1.6,22 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1507,18

177

Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dakota" Dakota" "NERC Region(s)",,"MRO" "Primary Energy Source",,"Coal" "Net Summer Capacity (megawatts)",6188,40 " Electric Utilities",4912,34 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",1276,40 "Net Generation (megawatthours)",34739542,39 " Electric Utilities",31343796,32 " Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power",3395746,41 "Emissions (thousand metric tons)" " Sulfur Dioxide",116,17 " Nitrogen Oxide",52,21 " Carbon Dioxide",31064,30 " Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",7.3,3 " Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh)",3.3,6 " Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh)",1971,6 "Total Retail Sales (megawatthours)",12956263,42

178

EA-1754: Final Environmental Assessment | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Final Environmental Assessment Final Environmental Assessment EA-1754: Final Environmental Assessment Public Service Company Of New Mexico Photovoltaic Plus Battery For Simultaneous Voltage Smoothing And Peak Shifting Project, Bernalillo County, New Mexico DOE prepared this EA to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of providing a financial assistance grant under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) in a cooperative agreement with the Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) as part of the Smart Grid Demonstrations Program. If PNM received the funding, the company would install a 2- to 4-megawatt-hour advanced absorbed valve-regulated lead acid battery, an access road, a parking lot, and a 3,000-foot underground electrical tie-in to the existing power distribution system (the proposed

179

CX-001575: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

75: Categorical Exclusion Determination 75: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001575: Categorical Exclusion Determination Modernization of Boulder Canyon Hydro Project CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 03/30/2010 Location(s): Boulder, Colorado Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office This project will refurbish the existing Boulder Canyon hydroelectric facility with a new turbine, generator, and wiring. Without new equipment, operation of the outdated facility is expected to cease within 5 years or less. The facility could produce over 500,000 megawatt hours of electricity over the lifetime of the project using existing water storage and transmission facilities. There will be no new construction outside of the facility. The bridge over Boulder Creek that provides access to the

180

CX-001202: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

02: Categorical Exclusion Determination 02: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001202: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cushman North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 03/21/2010 Location(s): Tacoma, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office This project will focus on the design and construction a new North Fork Skokomish Powerhouse, which will include an integral fish collection facility and fish handling and sorting device. The new powerhouse, which will produce about 23,500 megawatts hours of energy, increasing electrical generation capacity by 14 percent, requires design, engineering and construction. A fish transport system will be included as part of the design. Which will allow federally listed salmonids and trout that are swimming upstream to be trapped, sorted, and then released in the upper

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Campo 2020 Vision  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Campo's Renewable Energy Campo's Renewable Energy * One of 12 Kumeyaay tribes * Over 350 tribal members * Approximately 64 miles from the City of San Diego in Eastern San Diego County, California * Located on the U.S.- Mexico border  50 MW Wind Project completed in 2005, online in 2006  Electricity production of over 175 thousand megawatt hours in 2010  Largest utility-scale wind farm operating in Indian Country  Increased opportunity created with state and federal incentives for renewable energy projects  Transmission availability 4  August 2009 - Begin installation of met towers  December 2009 - Tribal Economic Development Bond  October 2010 - DOE grant funds confirmed 5  Phase I  Up to 250 MW  Wind and Solar

182

Smart Meter Company Boosting Production, Workforce | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Meter Company Boosting Production, Workforce Smart Meter Company Boosting Production, Workforce Smart Meter Company Boosting Production, Workforce September 30, 2010 - 10:53am Addthis Kevin Craft What does this mean for me? This South Carolina company is producing enough smart meters to reduce annual electricity use by approximately 1.7 million megawatt hours Smart meters provide detailed data on energy usage to both utilities and consumers and is a key component of the Smart Grid. In 2009, Itron Inc.'s manufacturing facility in West Union, South Carolina was the third largest industrial employer in Oconee County. Then, the company used a $5.2 million 48C Advanced Manufacturing Tax Credit awarded via the Recovery Act to re-equip the facility and hired 420 additional employees. "Improving our production capacity allowed us to hire more employees, and

183

Smart Meter Company Boosting Production, Workforce | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Smart Meter Company Boosting Production, Workforce Smart Meter Company Boosting Production, Workforce Smart Meter Company Boosting Production, Workforce September 30, 2010 - 10:53am Addthis Kevin Craft What does this mean for me? This South Carolina company is producing enough smart meters to reduce annual electricity use by approximately 1.7 million megawatt hours Smart meters provide detailed data on energy usage to both utilities and consumers and is a key component of the Smart Grid. In 2009, Itron Inc.'s manufacturing facility in West Union, South Carolina was the third largest industrial employer in Oconee County. Then, the company used a $5.2 million 48C Advanced Manufacturing Tax Credit awarded via the Recovery Act to re-equip the facility and hired 420 additional employees. "Improving our production capacity allowed us to hire more employees, and

184

College Fights Energy Rate Hikes with 'Grid Positive' Plan | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

College Fights Energy Rate Hikes with 'Grid Positive' Plan College Fights Energy Rate Hikes with 'Grid Positive' Plan College Fights Energy Rate Hikes with 'Grid Positive' Plan August 26, 2010 - 4:11pm Addthis Butte College's solar panels are helping it make more energy than it uses, providing it financial as well environmental benefits. | Photo courtesy of Butte College | Butte College's solar panels are helping it make more energy than it uses, providing it financial as well environmental benefits. | Photo courtesy of Butte College | Lorelei Laird Writer, Energy Empowers What does this mean for me? Community college campus will have 25,000 solar panels after latest installation and will generate 6,381 megawatt-hours of solar energy annually. $12.65 million in Clean Renewable Energy Bonds helped fund final 15,000 panels.

185

Fact Sheet: Sodium-Beta Batteries (October 2012)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sodium-Beta Batteries Sodium-Beta Batteries Improving the performance and reducing the cost of sodium-beta batteries for large-scale energy storage Sodium-beta batteries (Na-beta batteries or NBBs) use a solid beta-alumina (ß˝-Al 2 O 3 ) electrolyte membrane that selectively allows sodium ion transport between a positive electrode (e.g., a metal halide) and a negative sodium electrode. NBBs typically operate at temperatures near 350˚C. They are increasingly used in renewable storage and utility applications due to their high round-trip efficiency, high energy densities, and energy storage capacities ranging from a few kilowatt-hours to multiple megawatt-hours. In fact, U.S. utilities

186

Solar Generation Has a Bright Future | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Generation Has a Bright Future Generation Has a Bright Future Solar Generation Has a Bright Future September 12, 2012 - 3:06pm Addthis Growth of Solar Power Electricity Generation in the United States, 1999-2013 | Chart provided by the U.S. Energy Information Administration Growth of Solar Power Electricity Generation in the United States, 1999-2013 | Chart provided by the U.S. Energy Information Administration Matthew Loveless Matthew Loveless Data Integration Specialist, Office of Public Affairs The amount of electricity the United States generates from solar power has started to grow rapidly and is projected to reach 18,000 megawatt hours per day in 2013. A growing solar industry presents a tremendous economic opportunity for the United States, and that is why the Energy Department's SunShot Initiative

187

CX-005992: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

92: Categorical Exclusion Determination 92: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-005992: Categorical Exclusion Determination American Recovery and Reinvestment Act/State Energy Program - State of Louisiana Community Church Unitarian CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 05/23/2011 Location(s): New Orleans, Louisiana Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office The Louisiana State Energy Office through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources proposes to provide $51,213 of State Energy Program funds for the Community Church Unitarian Universalist at 316 38th Street in New Orleans, Louisiana to purchase and install a solar photovoltaic system on the church's roof. The system would provided 18.8 megawatt-hours of electrical generation per year. DOCUMENT(S) AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

188

Form EIA-861S ANNUAL ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY REPORT (SHORT FORM)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

INDUSTRY REPORT (SHORT FORM) INSTRUCTIONS OMB No. 1905-0129 Approval Expires: 12/31/2016 Burden: 2.01 Hours Page 1 Draft for Discussion only PURPOSE Form EIA-861S collects information on the status of selected electric power industry participants involved in the sale, and distribution of electric energy in the United States. The data collected on this form are used to monitor the current status and trends of the electric power industry and to evaluate the future of the industry. REQUIRED RESPONDENTS The Form EIA-861S is to be completed by all electric utilities with annual retail sales in the prior year of 100,000 megawatt-hours or less, with the following exceptions: 1. A respondent has retail sales of unbundled service; 2. A full set of data is required from the respondent to ensure that statistical estimates

189

SPPR Group Proposal  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Transmission Transmission Expansion in the West DOE Tribal Leader Energy Forum: Transmission and Clean Energy Development in the West February 7 - 8, 2012 Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado Tim Meeks Western Area Power Administration Presentation Overview Overview of Western Area Power Admin. Western as a neighbor Common challenges Initiatives - what we're working on Current Projects On the Horizon Overview of Western 3 One of Four Dept. of Energy PMAs 4 Markets 10,479 MW from 57 Federal Hydropower Projects owned by BOR , Corps, and IB&WC to preference power entities 17,100 miles of high-voltage transmission line across 15-states About 100 tribal customers who receive around 1.2 million megawatt hours per year Tribes make up 10% of Western's core power customers

190

Exemption from Electric Generation Tax (Connecticut) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Exemption from Electric Generation Tax (Connecticut) Exemption from Electric Generation Tax (Connecticut) Exemption from Electric Generation Tax (Connecticut) < Back Eligibility Commercial Savings Category Bioenergy Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Water Wind Energy Sources Solar Home Weatherization Program Info Start Date 07/01/2011 Expiration Date 10/01/2013 State Connecticut Program Type Sales Tax Incentive Rebate Amount 100% exemption Provider Connecticut Department of Revenue Services In 2011, Connecticut created a new tax requiring electric power plants in the state that generate and upload electricity to the regional bulk power grid to pay $2.50 per megawatt hour. Renewable energy facilities and customer-sited facilities are exempt from the tax. The tax and related

191

Document  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Federal Register 0 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Notices River, in Cheshire County, New Hampshire. The proposed project would consist of: (1) The existing 160-foot-long, 16- foot-high Ashuelot Park Dam with 2- foot-high flashboards; (2) the existing 34-acre reservoir with 120 acre-feet of storage capacity; (3) a new powerhouse below the existing outlet works containing two generating units with a installed capacity of 240 kilowatts; (4) a new 150-foot-long tailrace; and (5) an approximately 500-foot-long transmission line. The project would have an estimated average annual generation of 1,000 megawatts-hours. Applicant Contact: Mr. John Maclean, City Manager, 3 Washington Street, Keene, NH 03431, phone (603) 357- 9804. FERC Contact: Michael Spencer, (202)

192

Solar Trough Performance Evaluation: Cooperative Research and Development Final Report, CRADA Number CRD-08-00289  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

New HCEs were installed on the hot sides of the thermal loops at SEGS VIII and IX from mid-2007 to mid-2008. Due to significant increases in plant performance, an interest in a further increase performance by installing new HCEs on the cold portions of the loop developed. Although it was assumed that the plant performance would increase, the exact amount was unknown. The objective of this project was to estimate the performance improvements with new HCEs installed on the cold sides of the loop, with performance being evaluated as potential increases in electrical power production (megawatt-hours). A comparison of performance prior to and post installation of new HCEs on the hot sides of the loops was done. For completeness, an estimate of performance losses - such as the optical efficiency, mirror reflectivity, and optical accuracy - was also included in this analysis. National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) HCE Survey System was used to determine if the HCEs were hot or cold.

Gray, A.

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

193

Water watch  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Hydropower Generation Report provides generation figures for the largest hydropower producers in each of six regions in the US. The report compares, for each month, the amount of hydroelectricity generated (in thousands of megawatt-hours) by each producers in the last two years to the ten-year average for that month. This database is used to figure long-term generation averages and percent of averages. The producers regularly provide current generation data to update the database. This issue of [open quotes]Water Watch[close quotes] focuses on winter snow conditions across the US as of mid-January. In addition, the department provides an outlook of spring flood potential. The information presented is based on data from the US Geological Survey, the National Weather Service, and the Soil Conservation Service.

Not Available

1991-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

Laotian hydro scheme will supply Thailand  

SciTech Connect

Transmission lines between Laos and Thailand are being strengthened to allow Thailand the opportunity to benefit from the surplus power of the Nam Ngum hydroelectric project. Phase 2 of the project has increased capacity beyond expected Laotian demand in order to develop a long-term economic program of sales to Thailand, which can use the energy as a fuel replacement. Agreements of the Electric Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) and Electrite du Laos (EdL) specify sales at the rate of $4.50 per megawatt hour, with a mutual option to renew after ten years. Rural electrification, fisheries, and flood control benefits for Laos will add to the possibilities for economic development. Details are given in the article for the expansion and costs of the powerhouse, reservoirs, and transmission equipment. (DCK)

Budhraja, P.S.

1977-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

195

NREL: Concentrating Solar Power Research - 10-Megawatt Supercritical...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Turbine Test-Thermodynamic Cycle to Revolutionize CSP Systems Advancing concentrating solar power (CSP) systems to the target cost of 0.06...

196

Dynamic analysis of a 5 megawatt offshore floating wind turbine  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Enabling New Markets for Offshore Wind Energy." Proc. ofMary, and Laura Parsons. Offshore Wind Energy. Washingto,Challenges for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines. Tech. no.

Harriger, Evan Michael

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

197

Advanced High-Megawatt Converters for New Grid ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... DC microGRID HYDRO NUCLEAR HVAC TRANSMISSION ?ECC nECC pECC ... ?ECC HVAC TRANSMISSION COMBUSTION NUCLEAR ...

2012-08-02T23:59:59.000Z

198

High-megawatt Electric Drive Applications in Oil & Gas  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Page 7. Oil & Gas Electrification World Largest LNG Train from GE (8 MTPY) tested in Massa, Italy Page 8. 8 ... LNG/e-LNG example LNG Super Train ...

2012-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

199

Dynamic analysis of a 5 megawatt offshore floating wind turbine  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Enabling New Markets for Offshore Wind Energy." Proc.of European Wind Energy Conference 2009, Marseille, France.and S. E. Sowby. Standardized Wind and Wave Environments for

Harriger, Evan Michael

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

200

Dynamic analysis of a 5 megawatt offshore floating wind turbine  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1985. 23. Hau, E. Wind Turbines: Fundamentals, Technologies,for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines. Tech. no. NREL/CP-500-Full-scale Floating Wind Turbine." Statoil, 14 Oct. 2009.

Harriger, Evan Michael

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Megawatt-Class Lithium Ion Energy Storage Systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This project describes the most recent developments in the use of energy storage in frequency regulation and other ancillary service applications. This includes an analysis of limited storage in frequency regulation applications in the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection (PJM), as well as a case study of a lithium ion energy storage system installed in California.

2009-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

202

Dynamic analysis of a 5 megawatt offshore floating wind turbine  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of wind turbine. Rating Control Rotor Radius Rated Windturbines is a major design consideration due to cyclic loading induced by the rotating rotors [the turbine. The base was assumed to be fixed and the rotor

Harriger, Evan Michael

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Transmission of Megawatt Relativistic Electron Beams Through Millimeter Apertures  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

High power, relativistic electron beams from energy recovery linacs have great potential to realize new experimental paradigms for pioneering innovation in fundamental and applied research. A major design consideration for this new generation of experimental capabilities is the understanding of the halo associated with these bright, intense beams. In this Letter, we report on measurements performed using the 100 MeV, 430 kWatt CW electron beam from the energy recovery linac at the Jefferson Laboratory's Free Electron Laser facility as it traversed a set of small apertures in a 127 mm long aluminum block. Thermal measurements of the block together with neutron measurements near the beam-target interaction point yielded a consistent understanding of the beam losses. These were determined to be 3 ppm through a 2 mm diameter aperture and were maintained during a 7 hour continuous run.

R. Alarcon; S. Balascuta; S. V. Benson; W. Bertozzi; J. R. Boyce; R. Cowan; D. Douglas; P. Evtushenko; P. Fisher; E. Ihloff; N. Kalantarians; A. Kelleher; R. Legg; R. G. Milner; G. R. Neil; L. Ou; B. Schmookler; C. Tennant; C. Tschalaer; G. P. Williams; S. Zhang

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

204

Demonstration of an Advanced 250 Megawatt Integrated Gasification  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A report on a project conducted jointly under a cooperative agreement between: The U.S. Department of Energy and Tampa Electric CompanyCover image: The Polk Power Plant site as seen from across the lake in early evening. Photography courtesy of Lee Schmoe, Bechtel Power Corporation. Preparation and printing of this document conforms to the general funding provisions of a cooperative agreement between Tampa Electric Company and the U.S. Department of Energy. The funding contribution of the industrial participant permitted inclusion of

Combined-cycle Power Plant

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

205

Dynamic analysis of a 5 megawatt offshore floating wind turbine  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Enabling New Markets for Offshore Wind Energy." Proc. ofand Laura Parsons. Offshore Wind Energy. Washingto, DC:Challenges for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines. Tech. no.

Harriger, Evan Michael

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

EURISOL-DS Multi-Megawatt Target: Remote Handling Equipment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The design proposed within Task #2 of the EURISOL Design Study for the remote handling of the mercury converter target and its associated loop is presented with particular emphasis on achieving rapid turn-around during routine maintenance.The converter target needs to be completely exchanged every four months due to the high irradiation damage sustained. Other components are less susceptible to damage but may need periodic maintenance; in particular the on-line isotopic separation unit in the mercury loop.

Cyril Kharoua, Olivier Choisnet, Yacine Kadi, Karel Samec (CERN)

207

LINE","COMPNAME","COMPID","YEAR","PURCNAME","SALETYPE","MEGAWATT...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Spencer City of",554,1999,"Iowa State University","NF",3543,0,0,87758,87758 2,"Spencer City of",554,1999,"Alliant","NF",28,0,0,1443,1443 3,"Spencer City of",554,1999,"Mid-America...

208

The NIST 3 Megawatt Quantitative Heat Release Rate Facility  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... A pair of disposable flat disk filters is used to ... is a constant if the speeds of the roof and control ... generated pulse shapes such as a flatter top section ...

2004-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

209

Dynamic analysis of a 5 megawatt offshore floating wind turbine  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to the support platform is the NREL offshore 5- MW baselineOffshore wind turbine classification [3]. .. 3 Figure 1.2: Alternative platform

Harriger, Evan Michael

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

Today in Energy - Megatons to Megawatts program will conclude at ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Nuclear Electricity Consumption Total Energy. Topics Analysis & Projections Environment Markets & Finance Today in Energy. Geography States Countries Maps. Tools A-Z ...

211

Dynamic analysis of a 5 megawatt offshore floating wind turbine  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of European Wind Energy Conference 2009, Marseille, France.Enabling New Markets for Offshore Wind Energy." Proc.Parsons. Offshore Wind Energy. Washingto, DC: Environmental

Harriger, Evan Michael

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

212

Five-megawatt geothermal-power pilot-plant project  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This is a report on the Raft River Geothermal-Power Pilot-Plant Project (Geothermal Plant), located near Malta, Idaho; the review took place between July 20 and July 27, 1979. The Geothermal Plant is part of the Department of Energy's (DOE) overall effort to help commercialize the operation of electric power plants using geothermal energy sources. Numerous reasons were found to commend management for its achievements on the project. Some of these are highlighted, including: (a) a well-qualified and professional management team; (b) effective cost control, performance, and project scheduling; and (c) an effective and efficient quality-assurance program. Problem areas delineated, along with recommendations for solution, include: (1) project planning; (2) facility design; (3) facility construction costs; (4) geothermal resource; (5) drilling program; (6) two facility construction safety hazards; and (7) health and safety program. Appendices include comments from the Assistant Secretary for Resource Applications, the Controller, and the Acting Deputy Director, Procurement and Contracts Management.

Not Available

1980-08-29T23:59:59.000Z

213

LINE","COMPNAME","COMPID","YEAR","PURCNAME","SALETYPE","MEGAWATT...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

","FP",100480,17185,618928,713419,1332347 2,"Alexandria City of",295,1999,"MISSOURI RIVER ENERGY S","FP",130943,29583,2497127,2383703,4880830 999999,"Alexandria City...

214

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

182,40183,40183,100.5,95,97,19.88,33600,42,27 182,40183,40183,100.5,95,97,19.88,33600,42,27 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40183,40184,40184,95,90,92.96,-4.04,39200,49,25 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40184,40185,40185,94,83,86.45,-6.51,33600,42,30 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40185,40186,40186,90,81.5,83.19,-3.26,47200,53,27 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40186,40189,40189,91,88.75,89.88,6.69,42400,53,30 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40189,40190,40190,71,67.75,68.95,-20.93,78400,95,30 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40190,40191,40191,61.25,58.75,59.99,-8.96,52800,64,31 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40191,40192,40192,56.25,54.75,55.33,-4.66,71200,82,32 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40192,40193,40193,53.75,53,53.36,-1.97,44000,55,25 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40193,40196,40196,55.75,54.75,55.64,2.28,21600,25,12

215

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Indiana Rt Peak",41246,41247,41247,31.5,31.5,31.5,-1.5,1600,2,3 Indiana Rt Peak",41246,41247,41247,31.5,31.5,31.5,-1.5,1600,2,3 "Indiana Rt Peak",41247,41248,41248,34,33.5,33.75,2.25,1600,2,3 "Indiana Rt Peak",41248,41249,41249,37.25,37,37.13,3.38,8000,10,9 "Indiana Rt Peak",41249,41250,41250,34.25,33.25,33.67,-3.46,2400,3,6 "Indiana Rt Peak",41250,41253,41253,38.25,37,37.5,3.83,12800,16,13 "Indiana Rt Peak",41253,41254,41254,37.75,37.5,37.63,0.13,1600,2,4 "Indiana Rt Peak",41254,41255,41255,34,34,34,-3.63,2400,3,4 "Indiana Rt Peak",41255,41256,41256,32.25,32,32.19,-1.81,3200,4,6 "Indiana Rt Peak",41256,41257,41257,31,31,31,-1.19,1600,2,3 "Indiana Rt Peak",41257,41260,41260,33,32,32.5,1.5,1600,2,4 "Indiana Rt Peak",41260,41261,41261,33.9,33.5,33.66,1.16,3200,4,7

216

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

40911,40912,40912,35.25,34,34.38,-13.52,6400,8,9 40911,40912,40912,35.25,34,34.38,-13.52,6400,8,9 "Indiana",40912,40913,40913,31,30.45,30.73,-3.65,4800,6,7 "Indiana",40913,40914,40914,31,28.75,30.27,-0.46,20000,25,14 "Indiana",40917,40918,40918,29.05,29,29.03,-1.24,1600,2,4 "Indiana",40918,40919,40919,29.5,28.5,29.02,-0.01,5600,7,8 "Indiana",40919,40920,40920,32.25,30.75,31.59,2.57,6400,8,7 "Indiana",40920,40921,40921,35,33.25,33.92,2.33,30400,37,19 "Indiana",40921,40924,40924,29.5,29,29.25,-4.67,1600,2,4 "Indiana",40924,40925,40925,31.5,29.75,30.52,1.27,7200,9,8 "Indiana",40925,40926,40926,30.25,29.5,30,-0.52,3200,4,6 "Indiana",40926,40927,40927,33.75,32,32.61,2.61,13600,17,16 "Indiana",40927,40928,40928,33.5,32.5,33,0.39,9600,12,12

217

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

37.25,35.5,36.16,3.13,27200,25,16 37.25,35.5,36.16,3.13,27200,25,16 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",32,31,31.63,-4.53,12800,15,14 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",26.25,25.5,25.86,-5.77,7200,7,10 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",39.5,38.5,39.21,13.35,20000,24,13 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",47.75,45,46.51,7.3,27200,32,19 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",43.5,42,42.79,-3.72,39200,46,20

218

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

26,25.25,25.71,-1.15,6800,16,15 26,25.25,25.71,-1.15,6800,16,15 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",24,23.25,23.63,-2.08,14400,17,14 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",23.85,22,23.36,-0.27,8800,22,16 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",21.85,19.25,20.77,-2.59,10000,25,15 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",21.75,20,21.32,0.55,9600,23,14 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",21.25,19,20.42,-0.9,7200,16,14

219

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

40.5,40.35,40.43,2.67,3200,8,3 40.5,40.35,40.43,2.67,3200,8,3 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",41,40.85,40.97,0.54,2000,2,3 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",36.25,36.25,36.25,-4.72,3200,1,2 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",39.05,39,39.02,2.77,1200,2,2 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",36.25,36.25,36.25,-2.77,3200,2,3 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",36.75,36.5,36.63,0.38,1600,4,3

220

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

258,37259,37259,31,27.5,29.51,108000,101,28 258,37259,37259,31,27.5,29.51,108000,101,28 "PJM West",37259,37260,37260,28.25,26.95,27.38,107200,96,32 "PJM West",37260,37263,37263,26.7,26.25,26.45,102400,106,29 "PJM West",37263,37264,37264,26.25,25.45,25.75,87200,81,27 "PJM West",37264,37265,37265,24.85,24.2,24.45,53600,58,27 "PJM West",37265,37266,37266,23.6,22.5,23.05,88000,87,25 "PJM West",37266,37267,37267,23.05,22.75,22.91,72000,79,24 "PJM West",37267,37270,37270,25.1,24.55,24.88,75200,82,29 "PJM West",37270,37271,37271,23.65,22.6,23.44,47200,44,22 "PJM West",37271,37272,37272,23.05,22.85,22.95,42400,47,21 "PJM West",37272,37273,37273,23.6,23.1,23.33,68000,76,27 "PJM West",37273,37274,37274,23.8,23.3,23.47,72800,73,28

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

50.25,49,49.68,2.51,19200,46,20 50.25,49,49.68,2.51,19200,46,20 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",49.5,48.5,49.1,-0.58,18000,43,18 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",49.25,47,48.32,-0.78,27200,63,23 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",55,50.5,52.65,4.33,23200,29,20 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",47.75,46.5,47.18,-5.47,13600,34,19 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",47.75,44.75,45.82,-1.36,13600,28,18

222

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,50.33,2.26,87200,193,30 8,50.33,2.26,87200,193,30 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",45.5,48.4,-1.93,70400,154,29 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",45,46.48,-1.92,62000,146,28 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",49,51.48,5,90400,108,29 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",44.5,45.53,-5.95,38800,94,28

223

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1246,41247,41247,44.25,43.5,43.87,2.68,16400,29,14 1246,41247,41247,44.25,43.5,43.87,2.68,16400,29,14 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",41247,41248,41248,43,42,42.36,-1.51,36800,59,23 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",41248,41249,41249,40.25,39.75,40,-2.36,17200,24,11 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",41249,41250,41251,37,36.5,36.56,-3.44,31200,28,13 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",41250,41253,41253,41.25,40,40.84,4.28,12000,26,16 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",41253,41254,41254,39.5,38.5,39.08,-1.76,12400,26,15 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",41254,41255,41255,39.45,39,39.11,0.03,15600,26,13 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",41255,41256,41256,43.75,42,43.02,3.91,16000,32,20 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",41256,41257,41258,43,40.5,42.17,-0.85,38400,32,18 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",41257,41260,41260,42,41.5,41.62,-0.55,6400,10,11

224

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,49.6,0.49,22400,56,24 7,49.6,0.49,22400,56,24 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",54,56.09,6.49,29200,73,27 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",57.5,60.07,3.98,28400,71,26 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",50,55.19,-4.88,32800,41,20 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",52.5,56.14,0.95,20800,52,22

225

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

084,39085,39085,43.25,43.25,43.25,-1.79,800,1,2 084,39085,39085,43.25,43.25,43.25,-1.79,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",39086,39087,39087,42.5,42.25,42.38,-0.87,1600,2,4 "ERCOT-South",39087,39090,39090,43.25,43.25,43.25,0.87,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",39090,39091,39091,45,45,45,1.75,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",39091,39092,39092,44.5,44.5,44.5,-0.5,800,1,2,,,," " "ERCOT-South",39099,39100,39100,62,62,62,17.5,3200,4,6 "ERCOT-South",39100,39101,39101,56.5,56,56.17,-5.83,2400,3,5 "ERCOT-South",39101,39104,39104,55,55,55,-1.17,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",39104,39105,39105,57.25,57,57.08,2.08,2400,3,4 "ERCOT-South",39105,39106,39106,59,58,58.54,1.46,4800,6,5 "ERCOT-South",39106,39107,39107,58,57.75,57.81,-0.73,3200,4,5 "ERCOT-South",39107,39108,39108,54.5,54.5,54.5,-3.31,800,1,2

226

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

720,38721,38721,69,68,68.6,1.54,74400,63,23 720,38721,38721,69,68,68.6,1.54,74400,63,23 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38721,38722,38722,74.25,69,70.77,2.17,68000,68,33 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38722,38723,38723,77.75,73.5,76.91,6.14,61600,70,35 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38723,38726,38726,74,69,70.06,-6.85,55200,57,22 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38726,38727,38727,63,61.75,62.52,-7.54,60800,72,29 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38727,38728,38728,55,51,53.51,-9.01,68800,55,30 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38728,38729,38729,50.5,49,49.37,-4.14,56000,55,25 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38729,38730,38730,50.6,49.5,50.17,0.8,54400,55,25 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38730,38733,38733,63.5,59,60.85,10.68,36800,37,23 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38733,38734,38734,65,64,64.63,3.78,12000,10,13

227

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

449,39450,39450,74,72,73,1600,2,4 449,39450,39450,74,72,73,1600,2,4 "Entergy",39450,39451,39451,64,64,64,800,1,2 "Entergy",39451,39454,39454,47.5,46.5,47,2400,3,3 "Entergy",39454,39455,39455,41.5,41,41.17,2400,3,3 "Entergy",39455,39456,39456,43,43,43,800,1,2 "Entergy",39456,39457,39457,52,49,50.33,2400,3,5 "Entergy",39457,39458,39458,49,49,49,800,1,2 "Entergy",39458,39461,39461,67,67,67,800,1,2 "Entergy",39461,39462,39462,73,73,73,800,1,2 "Entergy",39462,39463,39463,69,68,68.33,2400,3,5 "Entergy",39463,39464,39464,70,64,68,2400,3,3 "Entergy",39464,39465,39465,65,65,65,1600,2,2 "Entergy",39465,39468,39468,79,75,76.67,2400,3,5 "Entergy",39468,39469,39469,74,73,73.7,4000,5,8

228

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8720,38721,38721,51,50,50.625,3200,4,4 8720,38721,38721,51,50,50.625,3200,4,4 "Entergy",38721,38722,38722,56.5,53.5,55.3,4000,5,7 "Entergy",38722,38723,38723,60,60,60,5600,6,5 "Entergy",38723,38726,38726,59,58,58.5,1600,2,3 "Entergy",38726,38727,38727,55.5,53,54.1,4000,5,5 "Entergy",38727,38728,38728,53.5,52,53.0938,6400,8,9 "Entergy",38728,38729,38729,49,46,47.6667,9600,11,8 "Entergy",38729,38730,38730,49,47.5,48.0417,4800,6,7 "Entergy",38730,38733,38733,54.25,54.25,54.25,800,1,2 "Entergy",38733,38734,38734,53.75,53.75,53.75,800,1,2 "Entergy",38734,38735,38735,62,58,60.1,4000,5,6 "Entergy",38735,38736,38736,60,58,58.875,4800,4,5 "Entergy",38736,38737,38737,55,50,53.1944,7200,9,8

229

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

623,37624,37624,32.5,29,30.16,20800,26,20 623,37624,37624,32.5,29,30.16,20800,26,20 "Entergy",37624,37627,37627,36.75,34.75,35.54,28800,27,18 "Entergy",37627,37628,37628,38,35.5,36.31,45600,53,26 "Entergy",37628,37629,37629,35,31.25,33.69,26400,33,21 "Entergy",37629,37630,37630,33.55,32.75,33.19,22400,26,20 "Entergy",37630,37631,37631,37.75,34.5,35.51,36000,45,24 "Entergy",37631,37634,37634,43.75,38.25,41.62,36800,46,20 "Entergy",37634,37635,37635,42.5,38,40.72,17600,22,18 "Entergy",37635,37636,37636,43,42,42.61,16800,21,17 "Entergy",37636,37637,37637,43,41.25,42.02,12000,15,15 "Entergy",37637,37638,37638,50,44.15,45.85,8800,10,13 "Entergy",37638,37641,37641,41,39.25,40.1,31200,29,16 "Entergy",37641,37642,37642,41.75,38,40.09,25600,27,15

230

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

43.75,40,42.24,2.81,10000,25,19 43.75,40,42.24,2.81,10000,25,19 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",40,38.75,39.35,-2.89,12400,31,16 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",45,41.5,43.54,4.19,16000,38,20 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",44,42.25,43.09,-0.45,13600,34,19 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",41.5,40,40.64,-2.45,20000,25,16 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",42.25,41,41.35,0.71,14000,34,17

231

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6894,36895,36895,74.5,74,74.25,1600,2,3 6894,36895,36895,74.5,74,74.25,1600,2,3 "NEPOOL",36899,36900,36900,83,81,82,1600,2,3 "NEPOOL",36900,36901,36901,89,88,88.67,2400,3,3 "NEPOOL",36901,36902,36902,77.5,73,75.25,1600,2,3 "NEPOOL",36902,36903,36903,75.75,75.75,75.75,800,1,2 "NEPOOL",36903,36906,36906,75,74,74.5,2400,3,3 "NEPOOL",36906,36907,36907,80,76.5,77.75,3200,4,3 "NEPOOL",36907,36908,36908,79.5,76,78.38,3200,4,4 "NEPOOL",36908,36909,36909,75.5,74.5,75,3200,3,4 "NEPOOL",36909,36910,36910,71.75,70.75,71.25,1600,2,3 "NEPOOL",36910,36913,36913,74.75,74,74.4,4000,5,3 "NEPOOL",36914,36915,36915,67.5,66.5,67,2400,3,3 "NEPOOL",36915,36916,36916,67,65.75,66.33,2400,3,2 "NEPOOL",36916,36917,36917,65,61.25,63.38,3200,4,3

232

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,47,48.2,3.37,9600,24,17 1,47,48.2,3.37,9600,24,17 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",56,53,55.36,7.17,9600,24,17 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",58.2,55,57.22,1.85,9200,23,17 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",52.25,49,50.04,-7.18,8400,21,19 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",45,43.5,44.24,-5.8,26400,28,22 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",52.5,50,51.46,7.22,7600,19,15

233

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

48,45.75,46.49,-0.96,30000,63,25 48,45.75,46.49,-0.96,30000,63,25 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",47.5,45,46.75,0.26,31600,79,22 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",51,45,45.83,-0.92,40000,50,24 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",51.25,47.75,48.43,2.6,26000,51,22 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",52.75,49.25,50.5,2.07,27200,68,23 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",52.5,51.5,52.02,1.52,46400,55,20

234

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

62,66.21,-0.74,44400,109,30 62,66.21,-0.74,44400,109,30 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",60,64.12,-2.09,45200,113,30 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",59,60.9,-3.22,99200,123,29 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",62,63.2,2.3,50400,114,31 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",61.75,62.98,-0.22,48800,122,31

235

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

43.25,42,42.63,4.13,1600,2,4 43.25,42,42.63,4.13,1600,2,4 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",42.65,42.65,42.65,0.02,800,1,2 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",45.25,44,44.86,2.21,5600,7,8 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",46.5,45.75,46.08,1.22,2400,3,6 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",45,45,45,-1.08,4000,4,4 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",44.75,44.75,44.75,-0.25,1600,2,4

236

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

355,38356,38356,56.85,56.25,56.7,6400,7,7 355,38356,38356,56.85,56.25,56.7,6400,7,7 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38356,38357,38357,55.25,55,55.0833,2400,3,3 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38357,38358,38358,59,59,59,800,1,2 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38358,38359,38359,57.5,57,57.25,2400,3,5 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38359,38362,38362,55.5,55.5,55.5,3200,4,6 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38362,38363,38363,58.75,58,58.575,9600,11,10 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38363,38364,38364,57.75,57.5,57.625,1600,2,4 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38364,38365,38365,55.75,55.25,55.4688,12800,15,11 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38365,38366,38366,58.5,58.25,58.4583,4800,5,6 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38366,38369,38369,92,85,88.7143,5600,7,8 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38369,38370,38370,97.5,97,97.1667,2400,3,5

237

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

22.6,23.25,-1.53,6400,14,16 22.6,23.25,-1.53,6400,14,16 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",18.25,18.97,-4.28,6400,8,9 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",18,19.32,0.35,5600,14,10 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",17,17.24,-2.08,7200,12,10 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",18,18.61,1.38,7200,17,17

238

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

988,37991,37991,38.5,38,38.29,10400,13,11 988,37991,37991,38.5,38,38.29,10400,13,11 "Entergy",37991,37992,37992,56,50.5,51.79,15200,19,13 "Entergy",37992,37993,37993,60,56,58.95,12000,15,9 "Entergy",37993,37994,37994,55,51,52.44,16800,21,14 "Entergy",37994,37995,37995,43,40.5,41.28,7200,9,9 "Entergy",37995,37998,37998,45,39,40.86,5600,7,8 "Entergy",37998,37999,37999,39.5,38,38.42,8000,10,7 "Entergy",37999,38000,38000,39,36,37.48,10400,12,9 "Entergy",38000,38001,38001,40.25,38,38.66,14400,17,10 "Entergy",38001,38002,38002,39,36.25,36.98,10400,12,9 "Entergy",38002,38005,38005,39,37,37.44,13600,12,9 "Entergy",38005,38006,38006,55,48,52.64,5600,7,10 "Entergy",38006,38007,38007,54,47,50.58,12000,15,11

239

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

65.25,63,64.48,0.53,9600,12,15 65.25,63,64.48,0.53,9600,12,15 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",59,57,57.68,-6.8,20000,23,13 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",58,57,57.45,-0.23,8800,9,9 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",57,55.75,56.53,-0.92,8000,10,12 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",57.5,56,56.46,-0.07,10400,13,10 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",59.25,56.75,58.09,1.63,20000,25,17

240

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7988,37991,37991,62,62,62,800,1,2 7988,37991,37991,62,62,62,800,1,2 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",37991,37992,37992,70,69,69.5,1600,2,2 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",37992,37993,37993,75.25,72,73.81,3200,4,6 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",37993,37994,37994,81,76,78.3,8000,10,11 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",37994,37995,37995,85.75,81.5,84.24,12800,16,12 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",37998,37999,37999,77,72.5,74.12,6400,8,9 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",37999,38000,38000,120,92,104.81,16800,21,11 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38000,38001,38001,375,270,311.75,6400,8,8 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38001,38002,38002,175,170,171,4000,5,5 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38005,38006,38006,90,84,86.78,7200,9,7 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38006,38007,38007,94,81.5,87.42,10400,13,13 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",38007,38008,38008,76,72,74.69,6400,8,8

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

31.9,30.75,31.02,,14000,34,10 31.9,30.75,31.02,,14000,34,10 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",28.85,28,28.3,-2.72,52000,59,13 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",31.5,31,31.22,2.92,20000,41,13 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",34.25,33.4,33.8,2.58,22000,47,13 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",30,29.75,29.9,-3.9,52800,54,16 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",28.25,27.85,27.95,-1.95,48000,57,11

242

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

59.05,59,59.03,2.03,1600,2,3 59.05,59,59.03,2.03,1600,2,3 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",63,63,63,3.97,800,1,2 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",62.5,60,61,-2,2400,3,6 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",63.75,63,63.32,2.32,5600,7,8 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",56,55,55.5,-7.82,3200,4,5 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",55.5,55.5,55.5,0,800,1,2

243

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

815,39818,39818,58.5,55.25,56.28,5.13,40000,45,27 815,39818,39818,58.5,55.25,56.28,5.13,40000,45,27 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39818,39819,39819,60.25,57.75,58.92,2.64,109600,119,41 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39819,39820,39820,58,55,56.66,-2.26,49600,60,29 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39820,39821,39821,55.55,55,55.21,-1.45,48000,56,34 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39821,39822,39822,63,60.75,61.9,6.69,38400,46,28 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39822,39825,39825,69,66,67.63,5.73,62400,74,37 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39825,39826,39826,66.5,61,64.03,-3.6,91200,107,40 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39826,39827,39827,85.5,80,82.91,18.88,103200,124,50 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39827,39828,39828,100,88,93.22,10.31,110400,135,51 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39828,39829,39829,110,93,98.58,5.36,77600,93,37

244

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

988,37991,37991,43.25,36,38.11,35200,40,16 988,37991,37991,43.25,36,38.11,35200,40,16 "PJM West",37991,37992,37992,53.5,50,51.99,33600,41,24 "PJM West",37992,37993,37993,70,66.25,67.48,34400,40,25 "PJM West",37993,37994,37994,62,59.65,60.58,36000,41,19 "PJM West",37994,37995,37995,56.75,53,54.66,32800,39,23 "PJM West",37995,37998,37998,53.75,51.25,52.44,40000,47,25 "PJM West",37998,37999,37999,54,52.55,53.14,37600,47,24 "PJM West",37999,38000,38000,65.25,61.5,63.18,30400,37,20 "PJM West",38000,38001,38001,88,77,82.58,50400,57,28 "PJM West",38001,38002,38002,90,77,80.76,31200,37,20 "PJM West",38002,38005,38005,53.25,52.75,53.03,30400,38,18 "PJM West",38005,38006,38006,70,67,68.64,36000,45,24

245

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

150,150,,400,1,2 150,150,,400,1,2 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",180,180,30,2400,3,4 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",310,310,130,400,1,2 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",350,350,40,400,1,2 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",165,165,-185,800,1,2

246

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1246,41247,41247,27.5,27.5,27.5,0.17,800,1,2 1246,41247,41247,27.5,27.5,27.5,0.17,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",41247,41248,41248,28.5,28.5,28.5,1,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",41248,41249,41249,30,30,30,1.5,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",41250,41253,41253,30,29,29.5,-0.5,1600,2,3 "Entergy Peak",41253,41254,41254,30,29.75,29.88,0.38,1600,2,2 "Entergy Peak",41254,41255,41255,29.75,29.75,29.75,-0.13,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",41269,41270,41270,32,32,32,2.25,1600,2,2 "Entergy Peak",41355,41358,41358,38.5,38.5,38.5,6.5,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",41367,41368,41368,35,35,35,-3.5,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",41425,41428,41428,37,37,37,2,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",41436,41437,41437,42,42,42,5,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",41446,41449,41449,41,41,41,-1,800,1,2

247

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

32.5,33.04,-3.33,15200,19,19 32.5,33.04,-3.33,15200,19,19 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",37,37.32,4.28,7600,19,18 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",35,35.46,-1.86,9600,24,22 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",37,38.66,3.2,14800,36,27 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",39.75,40.34,1.69,9200,23,22

248

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0911,40912,40912,27,26.5,26.83,-2.17,8800,11,6 0911,40912,40912,27,26.5,26.83,-2.17,8800,11,6 "ERCOT Houston",40912,40913,40913,28.3,28,28.18,1.35,4800,6,7 "ERCOT Houston",40913,40914,40914,26.35,26.2,26.29,-1.89,3200,4,6 "ERCOT Houston",40914,40917,40917,27.25,27,27.13,0.84,8000,10,5 "ERCOT Houston",40917,40918,40918,27.75,27.5,27.58,0.45,2400,3,3 "ERCOT Houston",40918,40919,40919,27.5,27.5,27.5,-0.08,1600,2,2 "ERCOT Houston",40919,40920,40920,31.5,31,31.33,3.83,2400,3,4 "ERCOT Houston",40920,40921,40921,31,30.25,30.5,-0.83,2400,2,4 "ERCOT Houston",40925,40926,40926,26,25.75,25.96,-4.54,5600,7,4 "ERCOT Houston",40926,40927,40927,23.75,23.75,23.75,-2.21,2400,3,5 "ERCOT Houston",40928,40931,40931,22.15,22.15,22.15,-1.6,800,1,2

249

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

258,37259,37259,26,22.95,24.08,51200,64,19 258,37259,37259,26,22.95,24.08,51200,64,19 "Entergy",37259,37260,37260,28.25,24.5,26.09,38400,47,17 "Entergy",37260,37263,37263,22.5,17,20.72,34400,43,16 "Entergy",37263,37264,37264,25,19,20.17,19200,24,15 "Entergy",37264,37265,37265,20,19,19.55,44000,54,19 "Entergy",37265,37266,37266,23,18.75,19.31,50400,62,18 "Entergy",37266,37267,37267,19,15,18.21,45600,56,18 "Entergy",37267,37270,37270,18.85,17.4,18.21,65600,81,17 "Entergy",37270,37271,37271,21.75,18.2,19.01,24800,28,18 "Entergy",37271,37272,37272,22.35,18.95,20.98,31200,38,16 "Entergy",37272,37273,37273,22,19,21.2,49600,62,22 "Entergy",37273,37274,37274,22.5,19.5,20.93,46400,55,20 "Entergy",37274,37277,37277,19.75,18.75,19.26,36000,45,18

250

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6893,36894,36894,83,83,83,800,1,2 6893,36894,36894,83,83,83,800,1,2 "Entergy",36894,36895,36895,93,93,93,800,1,2 "Entergy",36895,36896,36896,83,78.5,80.83,7200,9,4 "Entergy",36896,36899,36899,78,67,74.25,3200,4,5 "Entergy",36899,36900,36900,57,54,55.5,1600,2,4 "Entergy",36900,36901,36901,53,53,53,1600,1,2 "Entergy",36902,36903,36903,67.5,65,66.5,4000,5,3 "Entergy",36903,36906,36906,52.5,48,50.25,1600,2,3 "Entergy",36907,36908,36908,52,45,48.86,8800,11,4 "Entergy",36908,36909,36909,56,51,51.95,16800,21,6 "Entergy",36909,36910,36910,50,48.5,49.33,24000,30,7 "Entergy",36910,36913,36913,56.5,54,55.25,11200,13,7 "Entergy",36913,36914,36914,63,57,58.38,6400,8,3 "Entergy",36914,36915,36915,61.5,42,55.75,15200,19,9

251

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

449,39450,39450,180,158,161.65,26400,33,22 449,39450,39450,180,158,161.65,26400,33,22 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39450,39451,39451,123,108,114.27,36800,46,28 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39451,39454,39454,77,75.5,76.31,21600,26,17 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39454,39455,39455,68.25,66,67.1,41600,51,26 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39455,39456,39456,69.5,68,68.71,21600,27,18 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39456,39457,39457,81,74,75.75,30400,35,17 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39457,39458,39458,75,69.75,71.18,24800,31,19 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39458,39461,39461,80.5,77,79.38,17600,19,17 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39461,39462,39462,102,95,98.76,52000,64,24 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39462,39463,39463,90.5,87.5,88.59,34400,43,25 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39463,39464,39464,85,83.5,84.21,20800,26,14

252

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

815,39818,39818,43,42.5,42.75,5.17,1600,2,4 815,39818,39818,43,42.5,42.75,5.17,1600,2,4 "ERCOT-South",39818,39819,39819,40,39.5,39.88,-2.87,3200,4,3," " "ERCOT-South",39819,39820,39820,39,38,38.73,-1.15,8800,9,9 "ERCOT-South",39820,39821,39821,41.5,39,39.82,1.09,8800,11,9 "ERCOT-South",39821,39822,39822,38.75,37.5,38.03,-1.79,6400,8,10 "ERCOT-South",39822,39825,39825,43.5,43.5,43.5,5.47,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",39825,39826,39826,55,50.5,52.95,9.45,8800,11,12,,," " "ERCOT-South",39826,39827,39827,45.5,43.5,44.44,-8.51,14400,18,18 "ERCOT-South",39827,39828,39828,45,44.25,44.68,0.24,12000,14,12 "ERCOT-South",39828,39829,39829,44,42.75,43.18,-1.5,8000,10,10 "ERCOT-South",39833,39834,39834,33,32.5,32.75,-10.43,9600,12,8

253

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

54.5,53.4,53.98,5.44,3200,4,7 54.5,53.4,53.98,5.44,3200,4,7 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",49,47.25,48.27,-5.71,8000,10,12 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",56,53.5,54.75,6.48,4800,6,10 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",97,87,89.96,35.21,20800,18,16 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",56.25,51,53.71,-36.25,16800,19,15 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",46.75,46,46.33,-7.38,17600,22,17

254

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nepool MH Da Lmp ",39815,39818,39818,65.55,65,65.44,-5.89,12000,15,9 Nepool MH Da Lmp ",39815,39818,39818,65.55,65,65.44,-5.89,12000,15,9 "Nepool MH Da Lmp",39818,39819,39819,67,65,66.22,0.78,39200,46,22 "Nepool MH Da Lmp ",39819,39820,39820,65,63.25,63.83,-2.39,20000,24,18 "Nepool MH Da Lmp ",39820,39821,39821,67.5,65.75,66.47,2.64,28000,33,16 "Nepool MH Da Lmp ",39821,39822,39822,78.5,76,77.31,10.84,21600,27,16 "Nepool MH Da Lmp ",39822,39825,39825,100,90,94.19,16.88,28800,35,19 "Nepool MH Da Lmp ",39825,39826,39826,81,72.75,74.76,-19.43,36000,44,24 "Nepool MH Da Lmp ",39826,39827,39827,101,98,99.83,25.07,16000,20,18 "Nepool MH Da Lmp",39827,39828,39828,130,117,120.32,20.49,40000,50,27 "Nepool MH Da Lmp ",39828,39829,39829,120,106,109.76,-10.56,72800,91,35

255

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

SP 15",39449,39450,39450,74.6,69.25,73.56,97200,234,36 SP 15",39449,39450,39450,74.6,69.25,73.56,97200,234,36 "SP 15",39450,39451,39452,70,63,68.49,291200,275,37 "SP 15",39451,39454,39454,75,68,69.2,140000,326,39 "SP 15",39454,39455,39455,73.25,69,71.52,144800,329,37 "SP 15",39455,39456,39456,72.25,70.25,71.32,198000,425,35 "SP 15",39456,39457,39457,73.75,70.75,72.79,157600,351,37 "SP 15",39457,39458,39459,70.25,67.25,68.46,226400,268,33 "SP 15",39458,39461,39461,75,73.25,73.77,184000,366,38 "SP 15",39461,39462,39462,78.25,75,75.77,110800,235,34 "SP 15",39462,39463,39464,88,77.5,79.42,323200,351,36 "SP 15",39463,39465,39466,79,74.25,77.52,259200,302,36 "SP 15",39464,39468,39468,84.45,77,82.35,126400,287,36

256

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

54.55,54.05,54.37,1.9,8800,20,11 54.55,54.05,54.37,1.9,8800,20,11 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",53.25,52.75,53.09,-1.28,35200,64,16 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",52,51.25,51.51,-1.58,13600,28,17 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",56.5,53.25,54.08,2.57,65600,71,17 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",51.15,50.8,51.01,-3.07,27600,53,19 "NP15","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",50.75,50,50.18,-0.83,23200,39,11

257

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

084,39085,39085,62,55,55.98,10400,13,10 084,39085,39085,62,55,55.98,10400,13,10 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39085,39086,39086,54.75,52.75,53.53,30400,38,20 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39086,39087,39087,56,55,55.35,24800,31,19 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39087,39090,39090,58,56.5,57.08,8000,10,12 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39090,39091,39091,58.75,57.25,57.86,34400,41,19 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39091,39092,39092,60.5,59,59.8,20800,25,19 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39092,39093,39093,65,63.5,64.04,13600,16,15 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39093,39094,39094,61.25,59.75,60.82,15200,19,14 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39094,39097,39097,62,59,60.95,16800,21,16 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39097,39098,39098,69.25,67,68.25,22400,28,15 "NEPOOL MH DA LMP",39098,39099,39099,89,84.5,86.33,34400,43,26

258

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

53.5,48,50.93,,13600,17,11 53.5,48,50.93,,13600,17,11 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",57.5,52.75,55,4.07,31200,39,15 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",51.5,49.5,50.38,-4.62,3200,4,4 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",52,49.5,51.25,0.87,19200,24,12 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",46.75,45.25,45.8,-5.45,21600,27,14 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",43,39.5,41.3,-4.5,10400,13,8

259

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1246,41247,41247,28.5,26.5,27.76,-0.16,63200,141,25 1246,41247,41247,28.5,26.5,27.76,-0.16,63200,141,25 "Mid Columbia Peak",41247,41248,41248,28.5,27,27.86,0.1,79200,187,26 "Mid Columbia Peak",41248,41249,41249,28,23.5,27.02,-0.84,76000,170,25 "Mid Columbia Peak",41249,41250,41251,23.25,21.25,22.44,-4.58,159200,191,23 "Mid Columbia Peak",41250,41253,41253,25.25,21.25,23.45,1.01,74800,176,25 "Mid Columbia Peak",41253,41254,41254,23.75,20.75,22.51,-0.94,92800,209,26 "Mid Columbia Peak",41254,41255,41255,24.5,23,23.84,1.33,100800,222,27 "Mid Columbia Peak",41255,41256,41256,28,25.5,26.88,3.04,80800,182,26 "Mid Columbia Peak",41256,41257,41258,27.75,26.5,27.13,0.25,152000,171,25 "Mid Columbia Peak",41257,41260,41260,25.75,23.25,24.43,-2.7,76000,180,25

260

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

38.75,37.25,37.95,-2.02,13600,17,14 38.75,37.25,37.95,-2.02,13600,17,14 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",43.5,40,42.39,4.44,10000,25,20 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",39.5,37.75,38.26,-4.13,9200,23,15 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",40.25,37.25,38.46,0.2,7600,19,14 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",41,38,38.93,0.47,9200,23,15 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",38.25,36.5,37.29,-1.64,13600,17,17

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

623,37624,37624,37.45,33.75,35.69,28800,36,19 623,37624,37624,37.45,33.75,35.69,28800,36,19 "PJM West",37624,37627,37627,48,47,47.58,28800,32,20 "PJM West",37627,37628,37628,50.5,48,49.53,33600,42,19 "PJM West",37628,37629,37629,47,44.25,45.39,35200,44,20 "PJM West",37629,37630,37630,39,37,37.73,27200,33,19 "PJM West",37630,37631,37631,43.5,41.75,42.44,25600,27,17 "PJM West",37631,37634,37634,64,56.5,58.31,20800,26,19 "PJM West",37634,37635,37635,56,54.8,55.52,19200,24,19 "PJM West",37635,37636,37636,56.5,54.9,55.51,28000,33,19 "PJM West",37636,37637,37637,53,50.25,51.89,32000,40,22 "PJM West",37637,37638,37638,54,52,52.63,30400,38,23 "PJM West",37638,37641,37641,48.25,47,47.48,26400,33,17

262

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

258,37259,37259,33.75,32.5,33.23,10400,13,12 258,37259,37259,33.75,32.5,33.23,10400,13,12 "NEPOOL",37259,37260,37260,36.25,35,35.98,24800,31,18 "NEPOOL",37260,37263,37263,34,33.25,33.66,8800,11,12 "NEPOOL",37263,37264,37264,34,33.5,33.67,10400,13,11 "NEPOOL",37264,37265,37265,32.6,31,32.04,9600,11,13 "NEPOOL",37265,37266,37266,29.5,28.7,29.1,10400,13,11 "NEPOOL",37266,37267,37267,29.25,28.25,28.75,12000,15,12 "NEPOOL",37267,37270,37270,31,30,30.24,16800,17,13 "NEPOOL",37270,37271,37271,30.5,29.75,30.09,30400,36,15 "NEPOOL",37271,37272,37272,29.5,28.65,28.98,23200,28,15 "NEPOOL",37272,37273,37273,30.4,29.8,30.02,32800,39,16 "NEPOOL",37273,37274,37274,30,29.1,29.37,11200,14,15 "NEPOOL",37274,37277,37277,30,29.25,29.72,6400,8,9

263

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

182,40183,40183,89,82.75,86.08,20.49,214400,242,55 182,40183,40183,89,82.75,86.08,20.49,214400,242,55 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40183,40184,40184,80.65,74.5,77.16,-8.92,270400,295,56 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40184,40185,40185,80.5,77.5,78.92,1.76,93600,111,47 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40185,40186,40186,86,78.25,80.64,1.72,278400,316,62 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40186,40189,40189,82.75,72,80.64,0,81600,98,36 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40189,40190,40190,73,65.75,67.86,-12.78,178400,205,50 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40190,40191,40191,55.25,53,53.89,-13.97,162400,180,50 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40191,40192,40192,49.75,48,48.84,-5.05,97600,109,45 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40192,40193,40193,46.25,43.5,44.65,-4.19,99200,117,46 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40193,40196,40196,46,44.95,45.38,0.73,59200,71,35

264

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8721,38722,38722,57.5,57.5,57.5,-22.5,800,1,2 8721,38722,38722,57.5,57.5,57.5,-22.5,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",38748,38749,38749,57,57,57,-0.5,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",38751,38754,38754,59,59,59,2,1600,2,3 "ERCOT-South",38786,38789,38789,48,48,48,-11,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",38803,38804,38804,52.5,50.5,51.06,3.06,6400,8,7 "ERCOT-South",38804,38805,38805,54.75,54.75,54.75,3.69,3200,2,3 "ERCOT-South",38805,38806,38806,55.25,53.5,54.21,-0.54,4800,6,5 "ERCOT-South",38806,38807,38807,58,58,58,3.79,800,1,2,,,,," " "ERCOT-South",38810,38811,38811,60,60,60,2,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",38811,38812,38812,64,64,64,4,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",38812,38813,38813,63,62.5,62.63,-1.37,3200,4,6 "ERCOT-South",38813,38814,38814,62,62,62,-0.63,800,1,2

265

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

546,40547,40547,51,47.5,48.71,-0.32,96800,116,39 546,40547,40547,51,47.5,48.71,-0.32,96800,116,39 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40547,40548,40548,49.25,47.45,48.14,-0.57,64000,67,40 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40548,40549,40549,53.5,51.5,52.27,4.13,55200,66,37 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40549,40550,40550,60.5,57,58.43,6.16,80000,93,39 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40550,40553,40553,63.5,57,60.43,2,105600,124,41 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40553,40554,40554,69.5,64.25,66.98,6.55,128800,145,44 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40554,40555,40555,72.25,62,67.54,0.56,158400,194,51 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40555,40556,40556,84,75,80.13,12.59,92800,116,46 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40556,40557,40557,89.5,80.5,84.09,3.96,108800,133,42 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40557,40560,40560,57.55,55,56.11,-27.98,88800,105,40

266

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

40182,40183,40183,52.5,51.5,51.85,0.9,67600,116,25 40182,40183,40183,52.5,51.5,51.85,0.9,67600,116,25 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",40183,40184,40184,51.75,50.5,51.01,-0.84,61600,115,25 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",40184,40185,40185,53,50.5,51.39,0.38,59600,115,24 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",40185,40186,40187,58.5,55,56.79,5.4,394400,381,29 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",40186,40189,40189,51.25,50.75,51,-5.79,59200,116,26 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",40189,40190,40190,50.25,49,49.8,-1.2,53600,102,25 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",40190,40191,40192,51.5,50.75,51.12,1.32,59200,61,19 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",40191,40193,40194,49,48.25,48.35,-2.77,77600,71,20 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",40192,40196,40196,50.5,50,50.3,1.95,38800,71,18 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",40193,40197,40197,51.35,50,50.93,0.63,66800,84,19

267

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

084,39085,39085,43,43,43,4800,6,6 084,39085,39085,43,43,43,4800,6,6 "Entergy",39085,39086,39086,40,34,38.3,4000,5,6 "Entergy",39086,39087,39087,38,37,37.5,1600,2,2 "Entergy",39087,39090,39090,41,41,41,800,1,2 "Entergy",39090,39091,39091,49,46,48.14,5600,6,6 "Entergy",39091,39092,39092,48,48,48,2400,3,4 "Entergy",39092,39093,39093,49,47,48,1600,2,3 "Entergy",39093,39094,39094,45,44,44.5,1600,2,4 "Entergy",39094,39097,39097,51,47,49.33,2400,3,5 "Entergy",39097,39098,39098,58.5,53.5,56.06,6400,8,8 "Entergy",39098,39099,39099,62,56,58.97,7200,9,9 "Entergy",39099,39100,39100,54.5,53,53.6,4000,5,5 "Entergy",39100,39101,39101,50.75,50,50.15,4000,5,9 "Entergy",39101,39104,39104,55,53,54,2400,3,3

268

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

546,40547,40547,55.25,54,54.67,7.01,27200,29,18 546,40547,40547,55.25,54,54.67,7.01,27200,29,18 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40547,40548,40548,50,48.75,49.39,-5.28,14400,16,14 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40548,40549,40549,54.25,53,53.44,4.05,24800,31,23 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40549,40550,40550,55.5,53.25,54.05,0.61,84800,80,24 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40550,40553,40553,65.5,64.75,65.01,10.96,21600,25,18 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40553,40554,40554,71,68.5,69.33,4.32,15200,18,17 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40554,40555,40555,79,72,77.51,8.18,68800,85,29 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40555,40556,40556,100.5,88,94.96,17.45,40000,49,23 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40556,40557,40557,92.25,87,87.7,-7.26,25600,31,23 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40557,40560,40560,66,63.5,65.03,-22.67,28000,30,17

269

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

355,38356,38356,41,39,40.13,6.73,12000,14,13 355,38356,38356,41,39,40.13,6.73,12000,14,13 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38356,38357,38357,41,40,40.57,0.44,13600,15,15 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38357,38358,38358,44,42,43.23,2.66,30400,35,16 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38358,38359,38359,46.25,44,45.07,1.84,17600,22,12 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38359,38362,38362,39.5,38.75,39.17,-5.9,9600,12,11 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38362,38363,38363,45,41.5,43.31,4.14,26400,32,17 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38363,38364,38364,44,41.25,41.8,-1.51,16000,19,15 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38364,38365,38365,39.5,38.5,39.1,-2.7,10400,13,13 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38365,38366,38366,51.5,47,48.26,9.16,57600,58,17 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",38366,38369,38369,65,63,63.48,15.22,23200,21,14

270

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

34.5,34.5,34.5,3.21,1600,2,3 34.5,34.5,34.5,3.21,1600,2,3 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",35.75,35.5,35.58,1.08,2400,3,4 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",36.5,36,36.25,0.67,4000,5,7 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",36.25,36,36.13,-0.12,3200,4,4 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",44,43.5,43.75,7.62,3200,4,6 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",44.25,43.75,44.04,0.29,5600,7,8

271

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0911,40912,40912,27,26.5,26.63,-2.76,6400,8,6 0911,40912,40912,27,26.5,26.63,-2.76,6400,8,6 "ERCOT-South",40912,40913,40913,28,27.25,27.72,1.09,8000,9,7 "ERCOT-South",40913,40914,40914,25.75,25.75,25.75,-1.97,2400,3,4 "ERCOT-South",40914,40917,40917,27,27,27,1.25,1600,2,4 "ERCOT-South",40919,40920,40920,31,31,31,4,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",40920,40921,40921,30.25,30.25,30.25,-0.75,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",40925,40926,40926,25.5,25.5,25.5,-4.75,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",40926,40927,40927,23.25,23.25,23.25,-2.25,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",40931,40932,40932,24.5,24.5,24.5,1.25,800,1,2 "ERCOT-South",40932,40933,40933,26,25.75,25.96,1.46,4800,6,4 "ERCOT-South",40933,40934,40934,28,27,27.5,1.54,1600,2,4 "ERCOT-South",40934,40935,40935,29,28.75,28.88,1.38,1600,2,4

272

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

68.5,66,67.29,5.05,28400,71,21 68.5,66,67.29,5.05,28400,71,21 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",65,62.5,63.85,-3.44,27200,66,25 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",65.25,61.75,63.39,-0.46,80800,99,26 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",65.75,63.5,64.58,1.19,49200,107,25 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",65.75,64,64.98,0.4,32400,81,24 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",65.25,62.25,63.26,-1.72,78400,96,25

273

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

65.75,63,64.97,4.97,29600,55,25 65.75,63,64.97,4.97,29600,55,25 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",62.25,59,61.4,-3.57,106400,109,24 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",63,59.25,60.22,-1.18,45600,102,26 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",63.5,61.75,62.26,2.04,40400,86,26 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",64.2,62,62.52,0.26,38400,75,25 "Palo Verde","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",66.45,62,63.19,0.67,45200,87,27

274

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

PJM-West Real Time Peak",41276,41277,41277,44,41.75,42.64,-6.4,60000,72,34 PJM-West Real Time Peak",41276,41277,41277,44,41.75,42.64,-6.4,60000,72,34 "PJM-West Real Time Peak",41277,41278,41278,37,36,36.53,-6.11,19200,23,23 "PJM-West Real Time Peak",41278,41281,41281,36.5,36,36.17,-0.36,41600,48,32 "PJM-West Real Time Peak",41281,41282,41282,33.05,32.5,32.61,-3.56,20800,26,18 "PJM-West Real Time Peak",41282,41283,41283,33.75,32.5,32.91,0.3,37600,43,30 "PJM-West Real Time Peak",41283,41284,41284,31,30.25,30.64,-2.27,26400,31,26 "PJM-West Real Time Peak",41284,41285,41285,29.9,29.25,29.66,-0.98,38400,26,23 "PJM-West Real Time Peak",41285,41288,41288,32.5,31.5,32.14,2.48,40000,50,28 "PJM-West Real Time Peak",41288,41289,41289,37.5,34.5,36.5,4.36,64800,74,35

275

1 MW / 7.2 MWh NaS Battery Demonstration and Case Study Update  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The New York Power Authority (NYPA), working together with the Metropolitan Transit Authority Long Island Bus (LIB) Company, has installed an advanced sodium sulfur battery energy storage system (NaS BESS) at the LIB facility located at 700 Commercial Avenue, Garden City, New York. The BESS is capable of providing a nominal 1MW of power to the bus fueling compressor station for 6-8 hours per day, 7 days per week.

2009-12-18T23:59:59.000Z

276

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39904,39905,39905,30.85,30,30.44,"na",69200,129,16 SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39904,39905,39905,30.85,30,30.44,"na",69200,129,16 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39905,39906,39907,28.7,27.5,28.03,-2.41,119200,103,17 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39906,39909,39909,31.5,30.25,30.5,2.47,43200,89,17 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39909,39910,39910,33.3,32.45,32.83,2.33,40800,80,20 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39910,39911,39912,29,28,28.69,-4.14,116000,117,22 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39911,39913,39914,27.25,26.55,26.88,-1.81,96800,110,21 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39912,39916,39916,28.5,27.5,28.01,1.13,58000,119,19 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39916,39917,39917,26.65,25,26.27,-1.74,26400,51,17 "SP-15 Gen DA LMP Peak",39917,39918,39918,28.25,27.7,27.97,1.7,55600,101,20

277

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

43,39.05,41.9,4.15,5600,7,8 43,39.05,41.9,4.15,5600,7,8 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",40.5,38.5,39.53,-2.37,3200,4,7 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",39.25,38.25,38.9,-0.63,13600,17,15 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",41.5,39,40,1.1,10400,13,11 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",39,37.75,38.3,-1.7,12000,14,15 "ERCOT Houston","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",44.5,43,43.4,5.1,4000,5,5

278

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

62.5,65.15,3.64,62800,150,34 62.5,65.15,3.64,62800,150,34 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",54.25,61.54,-3.61,153600,172,34 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",60.5,62.02,0.48,81200,188,36 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",61.75,62.73,0.71,69600,168,34 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",62.75,63.47,0.74,74400,170,34

279

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,45.5,-0.2,22800,57,25 1,45.5,-0.2,22800,57,25 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",43.5,45.44,-0.06,96000,198,32 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",42.25,43.27,-2.17,89600,210,33 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",39,42.7,-0.57,118400,261,35 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",42.5,43.86,1.16,169600,196,33

280

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

40182,40183,40183,60.5,60.5,60.5,7.5,800,1,2 40182,40183,40183,60.5,60.5,60.5,7.5,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40183,40184,40184,62.25,62.25,62.25,1.75,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40189,40190,40190,63.5,60.75,62.42,0.17,2400,3,3 "Entergy Peak",40190,40191,40191,46,45,45.5,-16.92,1600,2,2 "Entergy Peak",40196,40197,40197,40,40,40,-5.5,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40197,40198,40198,40,40,40,0,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40198,40199,40199,38,38,38,-2,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40199,40200,40200,38,38,38,0,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40204,40205,40205,47,47,47,9,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40205,40206,40206,45,45,45,-2,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40206,40207,40207,48,48,48,3,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40210,40211,40211,43,43,43,-5,800,1,2

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

449,39450,39450,131,114,125.81,37.67,95200,116,49 449,39450,39450,131,114,125.81,37.67,95200,116,49 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39450,39451,39451,106,99,102.43,-23.38,78400,96,39 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39451,39454,39454,54,52.5,53.44,-48.99,65600,74,34 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39454,39455,39455,45,41,42.69,-10.75,87200,98,48 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39455,39456,39456,47.5,45,46.31,3.62,47200,57,36 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39456,39457,39457,59.5,54.25,57.53,11.22,35200,44,34 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39457,39458,39458,51,46.25,48.3,-9.23,72800,88,51 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39458,39461,39461,76.5,70,74.88,26.58,103200,121,42 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39461,39462,39462,80,75.5,77.94,3.06,109600,127,40 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",39462,39463,39463,72,68,70.47,-7.47,78400,95,35

282

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

911,40912,40912,56,52,53.84,-11.87,161600,191,55 911,40912,40912,56,52,53.84,-11.87,161600,191,55 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40912,40913,40913,39,38,38.7,-15.14,45600,54,30 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40913,40914,40914,33.25,33,33.05,-5.65,42400,53,33 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40914,40917,40917,37.25,36.5,36.8,3.75,43200,51,34 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40917,40918,40918,36,35.25,35.53,-1.27,48000,57,31 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40918,40919,40919,35,34.2,34.6,-0.93,32000,40,28 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40919,40920,40920,35.5,35,35.14,0.54,43200,48,27 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40920,40921,40921,40.75,38.6,39.44,4.3,108000,111,39 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40921,40924,40924,43.5,41.6,42.69,3.25,61600,74,39 "PJM Wh Real Time Peak",40924,40925,40925,35.25,34.5,34.68,-8.01,36000,44,23

283

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Da LMP Peak",41246,41247,41247,48,45.75,47.16,-7.85,40000,48,21 Da LMP Peak",41246,41247,41247,48,45.75,47.16,-7.85,40000,48,21 "Nepool MH Da LMP Peak",41247,41248,41248,58.5,55,57.81,10.65,26400,32,21 "Nepool MH Da LMP Peak",41248,41249,41249,79.75,75,76.49,18.68,32800,39,18 "Nepool MH Da LMP Peak",41249,41250,41250,65,50.5,51.47,-25.02,35200,42,23 "Nepool MH Da LMP Peak",41250,41253,41253,47,45.5,46.48,-4.99,12800,16,14 "Nepool MH Da LMP Peak",41253,41254,41254,50,46,47.3,0.82,38400,44,22 "Nepool MH Da LMP Peak",41254,41255,41255,70,57,59.54,12.24,39200,49,19 "Nepool MH Da LMP Peak",41255,41256,41256,50,48.25,48.97,-10.57,53600,59,29 "Nepool MH Da LMP Peak",41256,41257,41257,39.25,38.5,38.98,-9.99,11200,14,10 "Nepool MH Da LMP Peak",41257,41260,41260,45,45,45,6.02,3200,4,6

284

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

82,75,79.66,6.43,30400,38,26 82,75,79.66,6.43,30400,38,26 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",62,58,60.11,-19.55,24000,30,22 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",45.05,43.75,44.81,-15.3,24000,28,17 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",38,36,36.89,-7.92,35200,39,17 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",44,41.5,42.84,5.95,32000,39,23 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",48,44,46.44,3.6,22400,28,20

285

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

46,48.6,-4.22,46000,115,33 46,48.6,-4.22,46000,115,33 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",46.5,49.21,0.61,51600,120,30 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",45.75,46.71,-2.5,123200,150,36 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",46.5,49.35,2.64,63600,151,36 "Mid Columbia Peak","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",47.3,49.44,0.09,65600,163,34

286

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

39815,39818,39818,42,39,41,4.5,2400,3,4 39815,39818,39818,42,39,41,4.5,2400,3,4 "Entergy Peak",39818,39819,39819,44.5,44.5,44.5,3.5,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",39819,39820,39820,44.5,44,44.25,-0.25,1600,2,4 "Entergy Peak",39820,39821,39821,46,45,45.5,1.25,2400,3,6 "Entergy Peak",39821,39822,39822,45,45,45,-0.5,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",39822,39825,39825,45,40,42.5,-2.5,1600,2,3 "Entergy Peak",39825,39826,39826,48,48,48,5.5,1600,2,3 "Entergy Peak",39827,39828,39828,55,53,54,6,1600,2,4 "Entergy Peak",39828,39829,39829,56,53,54.33,0.33,2400,3,5 "Entergy Peak",39832,39833,39833,42.5,42.5,42.5,-11.83,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",39833,39834,39834,43,42,42.5,0,1600,2,4 "Entergy Peak",39836,39839,39839,40,38,39,-3.5,1600,2,3

287

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1246,41247,41247,30,30,30,-2.63,1600,2,2 1246,41247,41247,30,30,30,-2.63,1600,2,2 "ERCOT Houston",41250,41253,41253,33,33,33,3,800,1,2 "ERCOT Houston",41260,41261,41261,27,26.9,26.98,-6.02,4000,5,4 "ERCOT Houston",41263,41264,41264,28.5,28.25,28.33,1.35,2400,3,4 "ERCOT Houston",41270,41271,41271,26.5,26.5,26.5,-1.83,800,1,2 "ERCOT Houston",41288,41289,41289,34.25,34,34.13,7.63,1600,2,3 "ERCOT Houston",41289,41290,41290,33.85,33.75,33.78,-0.35,2400,3,4 "ERCOT Houston",41338,41339,41339,34.75,34.25,34.58,0.8,2400,3,3 "ERCOT Houston",41372,41373,41373,42.75,42.75,42.75,8.17,800,1,2 "ERCOT Houston",41381,41382,41382,35.55,35.55,35.55,-7.2,800,1,2 "ERCOT Houston",41386,41387,41387,37.5,37.5,37.5,1.95,800,1,2

288

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

60.75,57.5,59.33,7.47,34400,42,23 60.75,57.5,59.33,7.47,34400,42,23 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",58.5,55,56.62,-2.71,36800,45,25 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",65,62.25,63.61,6.99,76000,86,34 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",66.5,60,63.84,0.23,43200,52,26 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",58.5,55,57.1,-6.74,36000,41,21 "Indiana","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel","application/vnd.ms-excel",48,44,46.02,-11.08,33600,42,27

289

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

546,40547,40547,37,37,37,0,800,1,2 546,40547,40547,37,37,37,0,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40547,40548,40548,36,36,36,-1,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40548,40549,40549,33.75,33.75,33.75,-2.25,1600,2,2 "Entergy Peak",40550,40553,40553,42,42,42,8.25,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40555,40556,40556,52.75,49,50.88,8.88,1600,2,3 "Entergy Peak",40562,40563,40563,38.5,38,38.1,-12.78,4000,5,4 "Entergy Peak",40563,40564,40564,39,39,39,0.9,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40567,40568,40568,39,39,39,0,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40568,40569,40569,38,38,38,-1,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40571,40574,40574,36,36,36,-2,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40574,40575,40575,39.5,39.5,39.5,3.5,800,1,2 "Entergy Peak",40575,40576,40576,37,36.5,36.75,-2.75,1600,2,2

290

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Change","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Counterparties"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

DA LMP",40911,40912,40912,92,84.75,87.16,-14.07,46400,56,29 DA LMP",40911,40912,40912,92,84.75,87.16,-14.07,46400,56,29 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40912,40913,40913,49,46,47.55,-39.61,78400,77,24 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40913,40914,40914,39.75,39.25,39.57,-7.98,12000,15,10 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40914,40917,40917,39,38,38.39,-1.18,8800,11,9 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40917,40918,40918,38.25,38,38.14,-0.25,8000,9,11 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40918,40919,40919,41.5,39.9,40.88,2.74,70400,83,25 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40919,40920,40920,37.25,36.75,36.83,-4.05,20000,23,16 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40920,40921,40921,44,43.5,43.73,6.9,11200,11,12 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40921,40924,40924,67,65.5,66.35,22.62,16800,21,15 "Nepool MH DA LMP",40924,40925,40925,50.75,50,50.24,-16.11,11200,14,12

291

"Price Hub","Trade Date","Delivery Start Date","Delivery End Date","High Price $/MWh","Low Price $/MWh","Wtd Avg Price $/MWh","Daily Volume MWh","Number of Trades","Number of Companies"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6893,36894,36894,65.5,64.5,65,1600,2,2 6893,36894,36894,65.5,64.5,65,1600,2,2 "PJM West",36894,36895,36895,63,59.5,61.25,3200,4,2 "PJM West",36895,36896,36896,60,58.5,59.12,4800,6,4 "PJM West",36899,36900,36900,59.5,59.5,59.5,800,1,2 "PJM West",36900,36901,36901,58,55.5,56.61,5600,7,6 "PJM West",36901,36902,36902,50.5,49,49.75,3200,4,4 "PJM West",36902,36903,36903,47,46,46.33,4800,6,3 "PJM West",36903,36906,36906,45.5,45,45.12,3200,4,6 "PJM West",36906,36907,36907,46,42,44.21,5600,7,6 "PJM West",36907,36908,36908,42.5,42,42.4,4000,4,7 "PJM West",36908,36909,36909,41,39,39.56,7200,7,6 "PJM West",36909,36910,36910,39.5,39,39.25,2400,3,5 "PJM West",36910,36913,36913,51,50,50.43,5600,5,6

292

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Wyoming Electricity Profile 2010 Wyoming profile Wyoming Electricity Profile 2010 Wyoming profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Wyoming) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 7,986 37 Electric Utilities 6,931 31 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,056 41 Net Generation (megawatthours) 48,119,254 31 Electric Utilities 44,738,543 25 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,380,711 42 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 67 23 Nitrogen Oxide 61 15 Carbon Dioxide 45,703 21 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.1 19 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.8 7 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2,094 2 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 17,113,458 40 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 17,113,458 39

293

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Idaho Electricity Profile 2010 Idaho profile Idaho Electricity Profile 2010 Idaho profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Idaho) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 3,990 44 Electric Utilities 3,035 36 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 955 42 Net Generation (megawatthours) 12,024,564 44 Electric Utilities 8,589,208 37 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,435,356 40 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 7 45 Nitrogen Oxide 4 48 Carbon Dioxide 1,213 49 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.2 39 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.8 43 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 222 50 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 22,797,668 38 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 22,797,668 37

294

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

California Electricity Profile 2010 California profile California Electricity Profile 2010 California profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (California) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SPP/WECC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 67,328 2 Electric Utilities 28,689 2 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 38,639 4 Net Generation (megawatthours) 204,125,596 4 Electric Utilities 96,939,535 8 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 107,186,061 4 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 3 47 Nitrogen Oxide 80 9 Carbon Dioxide 55,406 16 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) * 49 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.9 41 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 598 46 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 258,525,414 2 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 240,948,673 2

295

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Tennessee Electricity Profile 2010 Tennessee full report Tennessee Electricity Profile 2010 Tennessee full report Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Tennessee) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC/SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 21,417 19 Electric Utilities 20,968 11 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 450 49 Net Generation (megawatthours) 82,348,625 19 Electric Utilities 79,816,049 15 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,532,576 45 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 138 13 Nitrogen Oxide 33 31 Carbon Dioxide 48,196 18 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.7 14 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.9 40 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,290 26 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 103,521,537 13 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 103,521,537 10

296

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Carolina Electricity Profile 2010 South Carolina profile Carolina Electricity Profile 2010 South Carolina profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (South Carolina) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 23,982 17 Electric Utilities 22,172 9 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,810 35 Net Generation (megawatthours) 104,153,133 14 Electric Utilities 100,610,887 6 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,542,246 39 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 106 19 Nitrogen Oxide 30 33 Carbon Dioxide 41,364 23 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.2 30 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.6 45 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 876 40 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 82,479,293 19 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 82,479,293 17

297

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

District of Columbia Electricity Profile 2010 District of Columbia profile District of Columbia Electricity Profile 2010 District of Columbia profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (District of Columbia) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Petroleum Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 790 51 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 790 46 Net Generation (megawatthours) 199,858 51 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 199,858 51 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 1 49 Nitrogen Oxide * 51 Carbon Dioxide 191 50 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 8.8 2 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 4.0 3 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2,104 1 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 11,876,995 43 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 3,388,490 50 Energy-Only Provider Sales (megawatthours) 8,488,505 12

298

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Virginia Electricity Profile 2010 Virginia profile Virginia Electricity Profile 2010 Virginia profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Virginia) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC/SERC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 24,109 16 Electric Utilities 19,434 15 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,676 21 Net Generation (megawatthours) 72,966,456 21 Electric Utilities 58,902,054 16 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 14,064,402 25 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 120 16 Nitrogen Oxide 49 24 Carbon Dioxide 39,719 25 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.6 15 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.5 23 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,200 30 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 113,806,135 10 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 113,806,135 7

299

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Delaware Electricity Profile 2010 Delaware profile Delaware Electricity Profile 2010 Delaware profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Delaware) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 3,389 46 Electric Utilities 55 48 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,334 29 Net Generation (megawatthours) 5,627,645 50 Electric Utilities 30,059 46 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 5,597,586 36 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 13 41 Nitrogen Oxide 5 47 Carbon Dioxide 4,187 45 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 5.2 7 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 16 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,640 15 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 11,605,932 44 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 7,582,539 46

300

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Colorado Electricity Profile 2010 Colorado profile Colorado Electricity Profile 2010 Colorado profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Colorado) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC/WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 13,777 30 Electric Utilities 9,114 28 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,662 22 Net Generation (megawatthours) 50,720,792 30 Electric Utilities 39,584,166 28 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 11,136,626 31 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 45 29 Nitrogen Oxide 55 20 Carbon Dioxide 40,499 24 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.0 32 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.4 10 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,760 12 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 52,917,786 27 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 52,917,786 24

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Kansas Electricity Profile 2010 Kansas profile Kansas Electricity Profile 2010 Kansas profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Kansas) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/SPP Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 12,543 32 Electric Utilities 11,732 20 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 812 45 Net Generation (megawatthours) 47,923,762 32 Electric Utilities 45,270,047 24 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,653,716 44 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 41 30 Nitrogen Oxide 46 26 Carbon Dioxide 36,321 26 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 33 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.1 13 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,671 14 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 40,420,675 32 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 40,420,675 30

302

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Pennsylvania Electricity Profile 2010 Pennsylvania profile Pennsylvania Electricity Profile 2010 Pennsylvania profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Pennsylvania) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 45,575 4 Electric Utilities 455 44 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 45,120 2 Net Generation (megawatthours) 229,752,306 2 Electric Utilities 1,086,500 42 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 228,665,806 2 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 387 3 Nitrogen Oxide 136 2 Carbon Dioxide 122,830 3 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.7 13 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.3 27 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,179 32 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 148,963,968 5 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 114,787,417 6

303

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Pennsylvania Electricity Profile 2010 Pennsylvania profile Pennsylvania Electricity Profile 2010 Pennsylvania profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Pennsylvania) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 45,575 4 Electric Utilities 455 44 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 45,120 2 Net Generation (megawatthours) 229,752,306 2 Electric Utilities 1,086,500 42 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 228,665,806 2 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 387 3 Nitrogen Oxide 136 2 Carbon Dioxide 122,830 3 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.7 13 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.3 27 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,179 32 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 148,963,968 5 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 114,787,417 6

304

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Wyoming Electricity Profile 2010 Wyoming profile Wyoming Electricity Profile 2010 Wyoming profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Wyoming) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 7,986 37 Electric Utilities 6,931 31 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,056 41 Net Generation (megawatthours) 48,119,254 31 Electric Utilities 44,738,543 25 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,380,711 42 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 67 23 Nitrogen Oxide 61 15 Carbon Dioxide 45,703 21 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.1 19 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.8 7 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2,094 2 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 17,113,458 40 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 17,113,458 39

305

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Kentucky Electricity Profile 2010 Kentucky profile Kentucky Electricity Profile 2010 Kentucky profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Kentucky) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC/SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 20,453 21 Electric Utilities 18,945 16 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,507 38 Net Generation (megawatthours) 98,217,658 17 Electric Utilities 97,472,144 7 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 745,514 48 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 249 7 Nitrogen Oxide 85 7 Carbon Dioxide 93,160 7 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 5.6 5 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 15 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2,091 3 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 93,569,426 14 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 93,569,426 12

306

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Michigan Electricity Profile 2010 Michigan profile Michigan Electricity Profile 2010 Michigan profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Michigan) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 29,831 11 Electric Utilities 21,639 10 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,192 14 Net Generation (megawatthours) 111,551,371 13 Electric Utilities 89,666,874 13 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 21,884,497 16 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 254 6 Nitrogen Oxide 89 6 Carbon Dioxide 74,480 11 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 5.0 8 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.8 19 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,472 20 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 103,649,219 12 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 94,565,247 11

307

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Alabama Electricity Profile 2010 Alabama profile Alabama Electricity Profile 2010 Alabama profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Alabama) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 32,417 9 Electric Utilities 23,642 7 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,775 12 Net Generation (megawatthours) 152,150,512 6 Electric Utilities 122,766,490 2 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 29,384,022 12 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 218 10 Nitrogen Oxide 66 14 Carbon Dioxide 79,375 9 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.2 18 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 36 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,150 33 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 90,862,645 15 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 90,862,645 13

308

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Michigan Electricity Profile 2010 Michigan profile Michigan Electricity Profile 2010 Michigan profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Michigan) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 29,831 11 Electric Utilities 21,639 10 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,192 14 Net Generation (megawatthours) 111,551,371 13 Electric Utilities 89,666,874 13 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 21,884,497 16 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 254 6 Nitrogen Oxide 89 6 Carbon Dioxide 74,480 11 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 5.0 8 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.8 19 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,472 20 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 103,649,219 12 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 94,565,247 11

309

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Ohio Electricity Profile 2010 Ohio profile Ohio Electricity Profile 2010 Ohio profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Ohio) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 33,071 8 Electric Utilities 20,179 13 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 12,892 7 Net Generation (megawatthours) 143,598,337 7 Electric Utilities 92,198,096 10 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 51,400,241 7 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 610 1 Nitrogen Oxide 122 3 Carbon Dioxide 121,964 4 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 9.4 1 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 17 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,872 8 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 154,145,418 4 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 105,329,797 9

310

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Wisconsin Electricity Profile 2010 Wisconsin profile Wisconsin Electricity Profile 2010 Wisconsin profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Wisconsin) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 17,836 23 Electric Utilities 13,098 19 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,738 20 Net Generation (megawatthours) 64,314,067 24 Electric Utilities 45,579,970 22 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 18,734,097 18 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 145 12 Nitrogen Oxide 49 25 Carbon Dioxide 47,238 19 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 5.0 9 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.7 20 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,619 16 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 68,752,417 22 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 68,752,417 21

311

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Tennessee Electricity Profile 2010 Tennessee full report Tennessee Electricity Profile 2010 Tennessee full report Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Tennessee) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC/SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 21,417 19 Electric Utilities 20,968 11 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 450 49 Net Generation (megawatthours) 82,348,625 19 Electric Utilities 79,816,049 15 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,532,576 45 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 138 13 Nitrogen Oxide 33 31 Carbon Dioxide 48,196 18 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.7 14 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.9 40 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,290 26 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 103,521,537 13 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 103,521,537 10

312

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Florida Electricity Profile 2010 Florida profile Florida Electricity Profile 2010 Florida profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Florida) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) FRCC/SERC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 59,147 3 Electric Utilities 50,853 1 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,294 13 Net Generation (megawatthours) 229,095,935 3 Electric Utilities 206,062,185 1 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 23,033,750 15 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 160 11 Nitrogen Oxide 101 5 Carbon Dioxide 123,811 2 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.5 37 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 35 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,191 31 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 231,209,614 3 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 231,209,614 3

313

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Arizona Electricity Profile 2010 Arizona profile Arizona Electricity Profile 2010 Arizona profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Arizona) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 26,392 15 Electric Utilities 20,115 14 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 6,277 16 Net Generation (megawatthours) 111,750,957 12 Electric Utilities 91,232,664 11 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 20,518,293 17 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 33 33 Nitrogen Oxide 57 17 Carbon Dioxide 55,683 15 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.7 43 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.1 31 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,099 35 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 72,831,737 21 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 72,831,737 20

314

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Kentucky Electricity Profile 2010 Kentucky profile Kentucky Electricity Profile 2010 Kentucky profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Kentucky) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC/SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 20,453 21 Electric Utilities 18,945 16 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,507 38 Net Generation (megawatthours) 98,217,658 17 Electric Utilities 97,472,144 7 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 745,514 48 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 249 7 Nitrogen Oxide 85 7 Carbon Dioxide 93,160 7 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 5.6 5 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 15 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2,091 3 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 93,569,426 14 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 93,569,426 12

315

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Alabama Electricity Profile 2010 Alabama profile Alabama Electricity Profile 2010 Alabama profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Alabama) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 32,417 9 Electric Utilities 23,642 7 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,775 12 Net Generation (megawatthours) 152,150,512 6 Electric Utilities 122,766,490 2 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 29,384,022 12 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 218 10 Nitrogen Oxide 66 14 Carbon Dioxide 79,375 9 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.2 18 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 36 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,150 33 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 90,862,645 15 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 90,862,645 13

316

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Arkansas Electricity Profile 2010 Arkansas profile Arkansas Electricity Profile 2010 Arkansas profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Arkansas) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC/SPP Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 15,981 25 Electric Utilities 11,488 23 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,493 24 Net Generation (megawatthours) 61,000,185 25 Electric Utilities 47,108,063 20 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 13,892,122 27 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 74 22 Nitrogen Oxide 40 29 Carbon Dioxide 34,018 28 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.7 22 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.5 24 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,229 29 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 48,194,285 29 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 48,194,285 27

317

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Maryland Electricity Profile 2010 Maryland profile Maryland Electricity Profile 2010 Maryland profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Maryland) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 12,516 33 Electric Utilities 80 47 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 12,436 9 Net Generation (megawatthours) 43,607,264 33 Electric Utilities 2,996 48 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 43,604,268 9 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 45 28 Nitrogen Oxide 25 34 Carbon Dioxide 26,369 33 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.3 29 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.3 29 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,333 24 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 65,335,498 24 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 36,082,473 31

318

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Hawaii Electricity Profile 2010 Hawaii profile Hawaii Electricity Profile 2010 Hawaii profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Hawaii) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) -- Primary Energy Source Petroleum Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 2,536 47 Electric Utilities 1,828 40 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 708 47 Net Generation (megawatthours) 10,836,036 45 Electric Utilities 6,416,068 38 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,419,968 38 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 17 36 Nitrogen Oxide 21 36 Carbon Dioxide 8,287 42 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.4 16 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 4.3 2 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,686 13 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 10,016,509 48 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 10,016,509 44

319

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mexico Electricity Profile 2010 New Mexico profile Mexico Electricity Profile 2010 New Mexico profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (New Mexico) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SPP/WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 8,130 36 Electric Utilities 6,345 33 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,785 36 Net Generation (megawatthours) 36,251,542 37 Electric Utilities 30,848,406 33 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 5,403,136 37 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 15 38 Nitrogen Oxide 56 19 Carbon Dioxide 29,379 31 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.9 42 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 3.4 5 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,787 11 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 22,428,344 39 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 22,428,344 38

320

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Hampshire Electricity Profile 2010 New Hampshire profile Hampshire Electricity Profile 2010 New Hampshire profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (New Hampshire) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) NPCC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 4,180 43 Electric Utilities 1,132 41 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,048 32 Net Generation (megawatthours) 22,195,912 42 Electric Utilities 3,979,333 41 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 18,216,579 19 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 34 32 Nitrogen Oxide 6 46 Carbon Dioxide 5,551 43 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.4 17 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.6 46 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 551 47 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 10,890,074 47 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 7,712,938 45

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oregon Electricity Profile 2010 Oregon profile Oregon Electricity Profile 2010 Oregon profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Oregon) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 14,261 29 Electric Utilities 10,846 27 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,415 28 Net Generation (megawatthours) 55,126,999 27 Electric Utilities 41,142,684 26 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 13,984,316 26 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 16 37 Nitrogen Oxide 15 42 Carbon Dioxide 10,094 40 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.6 44 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.6 47 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 404 48 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 46,025,945 30 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 44,525,865 29

322

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Maine Electricity Profile 2010 Maine profile Maine Electricity Profile 2010 Maine profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Maine) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) NPCC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 4,430 42 Electric Utilities 19 49 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,410 25 Net Generation (megawatthours) 17,018,660 43 Electric Utilities 1,759 49 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 17,016,901 22 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 12 42 Nitrogen Oxide 8 44 Carbon Dioxide 4,948 44 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.6 36 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.1 33 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 641 44 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 11,531,568 45 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 151,588 51 Energy-Only Provider Sales (megawatthours) 11,379,980 10

323

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Mississippi Electricity Profile 2010 Mississippi profile Mississippi Electricity Profile 2010 Mississippi profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Mississippi) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 15,691 26 Electric Utilities 10,858 26 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,833 18 Net Generation (megawatthours) 54,487,260 28 Electric Utilities 40,841,436 27 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 13,645,824 28 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 59 26 Nitrogen Oxide 31 32 Carbon Dioxide 26,845 32 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.4 26 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.2 30 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,086 36 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 49,687,166 28 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 49,687,166 26

324

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Washington Electricity Profile 2010 Washington profile Washington Electricity Profile 2010 Washington profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Washington) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 30,478 10 Electric Utilities 26,498 5 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,979 26 Net Generation (megawatthours) 103,472,729 15 Electric Utilities 88,057,219 14 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 15,415,510 23 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 14 39 Nitrogen Oxide 21 37 Carbon Dioxide 13,984 39 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.3 47 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.4 50 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 298 49 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 90,379,970 16 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 88,116,958 14

325

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Mexico Electricity Profile 2010 New Mexico profile Mexico Electricity Profile 2010 New Mexico profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (New Mexico) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SPP/WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 8,130 36 Electric Utilities 6,345 33 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,785 36 Net Generation (megawatthours) 36,251,542 37 Electric Utilities 30,848,406 33 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 5,403,136 37 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 15 38 Nitrogen Oxide 56 19 Carbon Dioxide 29,379 31 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.9 42 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 3.4 5 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,787 11 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 22,428,344 39 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 22,428,344 38

326

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Delaware Electricity Profile 2010 Delaware profile Delaware Electricity Profile 2010 Delaware profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Delaware) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 3,389 46 Electric Utilities 55 48 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,334 29 Net Generation (megawatthours) 5,627,645 50 Electric Utilities 30,059 46 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 5,597,586 36 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 13 41 Nitrogen Oxide 5 47 Carbon Dioxide 4,187 45 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 5.2 7 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 16 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,640 15 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 11,605,932 44 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 7,582,539 46

327

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Ohio Electricity Profile 2010 Ohio profile Ohio Electricity Profile 2010 Ohio profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Ohio) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 33,071 8 Electric Utilities 20,179 13 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 12,892 7 Net Generation (megawatthours) 143,598,337 7 Electric Utilities 92,198,096 10 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 51,400,241 7 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 610 1 Nitrogen Oxide 122 3 Carbon Dioxide 121,964 4 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 9.4 1 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 17 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,872 8 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 154,145,418 4 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 105,329,797 9

328

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Arkansas Electricity Profile 2010 Arkansas profile Arkansas Electricity Profile 2010 Arkansas profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Arkansas) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC/SPP Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 15,981 25 Electric Utilities 11,488 23 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,493 24 Net Generation (megawatthours) 61,000,185 25 Electric Utilities 47,108,063 20 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 13,892,122 27 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 74 22 Nitrogen Oxide 40 29 Carbon Dioxide 34,018 28 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.7 22 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.5 24 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,229 29 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 48,194,285 29 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 48,194,285 27

329

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Oklahoma Electricity Profile 2010 Oklahoma profile Oklahoma Electricity Profile 2010 Oklahoma profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Oklahoma) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SPP Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 21,022 20 Electric Utilities 16,015 18 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 5,006 17 Net Generation (megawatthours) 72,250,733 22 Electric Utilities 57,421,195 17 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 14,829,538 24 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 85 21 Nitrogen Oxide 71 12 Carbon Dioxide 49,536 17 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.6 24 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.2 11 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,512 17 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 57,845,980 25 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 57,845,980 23

330

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Iowa Electricity Profile 2010 Iowa profile Iowa Electricity Profile 2010 Iowa profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Iowa) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 14,592 28 Electric Utilities 11,282 24 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,310 30 Net Generation (megawatthours) 57,508,721 26 Electric Utilities 46,188,988 21 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 11,319,733 30 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 108 18 Nitrogen Oxide 50 22 Carbon Dioxide 47,211 20 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 4.1 11 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 14 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,810 10 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 45,445,269 31 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 45,445,269 28

331

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

West Virginia Electricity Profile 2010 West Virginia profile West Virginia Electricity Profile 2010 West Virginia profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (West Virginia) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 16,495 24 Electric Utilities 11,719 21 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,775 19 Net Generation (megawatthours) 80,788,947 20 Electric Utilities 56,719,755 18 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 24,069,192 13 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 105 20 Nitrogen Oxide 49 23 Carbon Dioxide 74,283 12 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.9 20 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.3 25 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2,027 5 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 32,031,803 34 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 32,031,803 33

332

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Vermont Electricity Profile 2010 Vermont profile Vermont Electricity Profile 2010 Vermont profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Vermont) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) NPCC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 1,128 50 Electric Utilities 260 45 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 868 43 Net Generation (megawatthours) 6,619,990 49 Electric Utilities 720,853 44 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 5,899,137 35 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide * 51 Nitrogen Oxide 1 50 Carbon Dioxide 8 51 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) * 51 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.2 51 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3 51 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 5,594,833 51 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 5,594,833 48 Direct Use (megawatthours) 19,806 47

333

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Mississippi Electricity Profile 2010 Mississippi profile Mississippi Electricity Profile 2010 Mississippi profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Mississippi) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 15,691 26 Electric Utilities 10,858 26 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,833 18 Net Generation (megawatthours) 54,487,260 28 Electric Utilities 40,841,436 27 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 13,645,824 28 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 59 26 Nitrogen Oxide 31 32 Carbon Dioxide 26,845 32 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.4 26 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.2 30 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,086 36 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 49,687,166 28 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 49,687,166 26

334

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Wisconsin Electricity Profile 2010 Wisconsin profile Wisconsin Electricity Profile 2010 Wisconsin profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Wisconsin) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 17,836 23 Electric Utilities 13,098 19 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,738 20 Net Generation (megawatthours) 64,314,067 24 Electric Utilities 45,579,970 22 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 18,734,097 18 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 145 12 Nitrogen Oxide 49 25 Carbon Dioxide 47,238 19 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 5.0 9 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.7 20 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,619 16 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 68,752,417 22 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 68,752,417 21

335

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Colorado Electricity Profile 2010 Colorado profile Colorado Electricity Profile 2010 Colorado profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Colorado) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC/WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 13,777 30 Electric Utilities 9,114 28 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,662 22 Net Generation (megawatthours) 50,720,792 30 Electric Utilities 39,584,166 28 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 11,136,626 31 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 45 29 Nitrogen Oxide 55 20 Carbon Dioxide 40,499 24 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.0 32 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.4 10 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,760 12 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 52,917,786 27 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 52,917,786 24

336

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Hampshire Electricity Profile 2010 New Hampshire profile Hampshire Electricity Profile 2010 New Hampshire profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (New Hampshire) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) NPCC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 4,180 43 Electric Utilities 1,132 41 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,048 32 Net Generation (megawatthours) 22,195,912 42 Electric Utilities 3,979,333 41 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 18,216,579 19 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 34 32 Nitrogen Oxide 6 46 Carbon Dioxide 5,551 43 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.4 17 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.6 46 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 551 47 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 10,890,074 47 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 7,712,938 45

337

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Carolina Electricity Profile 2010 North Carolina profile Carolina Electricity Profile 2010 North Carolina profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (North Carolina) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 27,674 12 Electric Utilities 25,553 6 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,121 34 Net Generation (megawatthours) 128,678,483 10 Electric Utilities 121,251,138 3 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 7,427,345 34 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 131 14 Nitrogen Oxide 57 16 Carbon Dioxide 73,241 13 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.2 31 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 34 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,255 28 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 136,414,947 9 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 136,414,947 5

338

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Nevada Electricity Profile 2010 Nevada profile Nevada Electricity Profile 2010 Nevada profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Nevada) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 11,421 34 Electric Utilities 8,713 29 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,708 33 Net Generation (megawatthours) 35,146,248 38 Electric Utilities 23,710,917 34 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 11,435,331 29 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 7 44 Nitrogen Oxide 15 40 Carbon Dioxide 17,020 38 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.4 46 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 37 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,068 37 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 33,772,595 33 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 32,348,879 32

339

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Kansas Electricity Profile 2010 Kansas profile Kansas Electricity Profile 2010 Kansas profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Kansas) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/SPP Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 12,543 32 Electric Utilities 11,732 20 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 812 45 Net Generation (megawatthours) 47,923,762 32 Electric Utilities 45,270,047 24 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,653,716 44 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 41 30 Nitrogen Oxide 46 26 Carbon Dioxide 36,321 26 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 33 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.1 13 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,671 14 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 40,420,675 32 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 40,420,675 30

340

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nebraska Electricity Profile 2010 Nebraska profile Nebraska Electricity Profile 2010 Nebraska profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Nebraska) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/SPP Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 7,857 38 Electric Utilities 7,647 30 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 210 50 Net Generation (megawatthours) 36,630,006 36 Electric Utilities 36,242,921 30 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 387,085 50 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 65 24 Nitrogen Oxide 40 30 Carbon Dioxide 24,461 34 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.9 12 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.4 9 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,472 19 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 29,849,460 36 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 29,849,460 35

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Missouri Electricity Profile 2010 Missouri profile Missouri Electricity Profile 2010 Missouri profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Missouri) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC/SPP Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 21,739 18 Electric Utilities 20,360 12 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,378 39 Net Generation (megawatthours) 92,312,989 18 Electric Utilities 90,176,805 12 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,136,184 46 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 233 8 Nitrogen Oxide 56 18 Carbon Dioxide 78,815 10 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 5.6 6 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.3 26 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,882 7 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 86,085,117 17 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 86,085,117 15

342

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dakota Electricity Profile 2010 North Dakota profile Dakota Electricity Profile 2010 North Dakota profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (North Dakota) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 6,188 40 Electric Utilities 4,912 34 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,276 40 Net Generation (megawatthours) 34,739,542 39 Electric Utilities 31,343,796 32 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,395,746 41 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 116 17 Nitrogen Oxide 52 21 Carbon Dioxide 31,064 30 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 7.3 3 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 3.3 6 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,971 6 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 12,956,263 42 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 12,956,263 41

343

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Minnesota Electricity Profile 2010 Minnesota profile Minnesota Electricity Profile 2010 Minnesota profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Minnesota) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 14,715 27 Electric Utilities 11,547 22 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,168 31 Net Generation (megawatthours) 53,670,227 29 Electric Utilities 45,428,599 23 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,241,628 32 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 57 27 Nitrogen Oxide 44 27 Carbon Dioxide 32,946 29 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.3 27 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.8 18 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,353 21 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 67,799,706 23 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 67,799,706 22

344

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Louisiana Electricity Profile 2010 Louisiana profile Louisiana Electricity Profile 2010 Louisiana profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Louisiana) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC/SPP Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 26,744 14 Electric Utilities 16,471 17 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 10,272 10 Net Generation (megawatthours) 102,884,940 16 Electric Utilities 51,680,682 19 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 51,204,258 8 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 126 15 Nitrogen Oxide 75 11 Carbon Dioxide 58,706 14 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.7 21 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.6 21 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,258 27 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 85,079,692 18 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 85,079,692 16

345

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Utah Electricity Profile 2010 Utah profile Utah Electricity Profile 2010 Utah profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Utah) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 7,497 39 Electric Utilities 6,648 32 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 849 44 Net Generation (megawatthours) 42,249,355 35 Electric Utilities 39,522,124 29 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,727,231 43 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 25 34 Nitrogen Oxide 68 13 Carbon Dioxide 35,519 27 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.3 38 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 3.6 4 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,853 9 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 28,044,001 37 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 28,044,001 36

346

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Virginia Electricity Profile 2010 Virginia profile Virginia Electricity Profile 2010 Virginia profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Virginia) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC/SERC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 24,109 16 Electric Utilities 19,434 15 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,676 21 Net Generation (megawatthours) 72,966,456 21 Electric Utilities 58,902,054 16 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 14,064,402 25 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 120 16 Nitrogen Oxide 49 24 Carbon Dioxide 39,719 25 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.6 15 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.5 23 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,200 30 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 113,806,135 10 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 113,806,135 7

347

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Dakota Electricity Profile 2010 North Dakota profile Dakota Electricity Profile 2010 North Dakota profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (North Dakota) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 6,188 40 Electric Utilities 4,912 34 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,276 40 Net Generation (megawatthours) 34,739,542 39 Electric Utilities 31,343,796 32 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,395,746 41 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 116 17 Nitrogen Oxide 52 21 Carbon Dioxide 31,064 30 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 7.3 3 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 3.3 6 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,971 6 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 12,956,263 42 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 12,956,263 41

348

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Alaska Electricity Profile 2010 Alaska profile Alaska Electricity Profile 2010 Alaska profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Alaska) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) -- Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 2,067 48 Electric Utilities 1,889 39 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 178 51 Net Generation (megawatthours) 6,759,576 48 Electric Utilities 6,205,050 40 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 554,526 49 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 3 46 Nitrogen Oxide 16 39 Carbon Dioxide 4,125 46 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 41 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 5.2 1 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,345 23 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 6,247,038 50 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 6,247,038 47

349

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Minnesota Electricity Profile 2010 Minnesota profile Minnesota Electricity Profile 2010 Minnesota profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Minnesota) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 14,715 27 Electric Utilities 11,547 22 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,168 31 Net Generation (megawatthours) 53,670,227 29 Electric Utilities 45,428,599 23 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,241,628 32 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 57 27 Nitrogen Oxide 44 27 Carbon Dioxide 32,946 29 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.3 27 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.8 18 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,353 21 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 67,799,706 23 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 67,799,706 22

350

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Maryland Electricity Profile 2010 Maryland profile Maryland Electricity Profile 2010 Maryland profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Maryland) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 12,516 33 Electric Utilities 80 47 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 12,436 9 Net Generation (megawatthours) 43,607,264 33 Electric Utilities 2,996 48 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 43,604,268 9 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 45 28 Nitrogen Oxide 25 34 Carbon Dioxide 26,369 33 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.3 29 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.3 29 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,333 24 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 65,335,498 24 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 36,082,473 31

351

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

York Electricity Profile 2010 New York profile York Electricity Profile 2010 New York profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (New York) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) NPCC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 39,357 6 Electric Utilities 11,032 25 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 28,325 5 Net Generation (megawatthours) 136,961,654 9 Electric Utilities 34,633,335 31 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 102,328,319 5 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 62 25 Nitrogen Oxide 44 28 Carbon Dioxide 41,584 22 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 40 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.7 44 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 669 42 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 144,623,573 7 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 79,119,769 18

352

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Carolina Electricity Profile 2010 North Carolina profile Carolina Electricity Profile 2010 North Carolina profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (North Carolina) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 27,674 12 Electric Utilities 25,553 6 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,121 34 Net Generation (megawatthours) 128,678,483 10 Electric Utilities 121,251,138 3 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 7,427,345 34 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 131 14 Nitrogen Oxide 57 16 Carbon Dioxide 73,241 13 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.2 31 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 34 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,255 28 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 136,414,947 9 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 136,414,947 5

353

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Montana Electricity Profile 2010 Montana profile Montana Electricity Profile 2010 Montana profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Montana) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 5,866 41 Electric Utilities 2,340 38 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,526 27 Net Generation (megawatthours) 29,791,181 41 Electric Utilities 6,271,180 39 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 23,520,001 14 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 22 35 Nitrogen Oxide 21 35 Carbon Dioxide 20,370 35 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.6 35 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.6 22 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,507 18 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 13,423,138 41 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 10,803,422 43

354

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Iowa Electricity Profile 2010 Iowa profile Iowa Electricity Profile 2010 Iowa profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Iowa) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/SERC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 14,592 28 Electric Utilities 11,282 24 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,310 30 Net Generation (megawatthours) 57,508,721 26 Electric Utilities 46,188,988 21 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 11,319,733 30 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 108 18 Nitrogen Oxide 50 22 Carbon Dioxide 47,211 20 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 4.1 11 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.9 14 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,810 10 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 45,445,269 31 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 45,445,269 28

355

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Illinois Electricity Profile 2010 Illinois profile Illinois Electricity Profile 2010 Illinois profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Illinois) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/RFC/SERC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 44,127 5 Electric Utilities 4,800 35 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 39,327 3 Net Generation (megawatthours) 201,351,872 5 Electric Utilities 12,418,332 35 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 188,933,540 3 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 232 9 Nitrogen Oxide 83 8 Carbon Dioxide 103,128 6 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.5 25 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.9 38 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,129 34 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 144,760,674 6 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 77,890,532 19

356

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Louisiana Electricity Profile 2010 Louisiana profile Louisiana Electricity Profile 2010 Louisiana profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Louisiana) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC/SPP Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 26,744 14 Electric Utilities 16,471 17 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 10,272 10 Net Generation (megawatthours) 102,884,940 16 Electric Utilities 51,680,682 19 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 51,204,258 8 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 126 15 Nitrogen Oxide 75 11 Carbon Dioxide 58,706 14 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.7 21 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.6 21 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,258 27 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 85,079,692 18 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 85,079,692 16

357

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

California Electricity Profile 2010 California profile California Electricity Profile 2010 California profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (California) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SPP/WECC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 67,328 2 Electric Utilities 28,689 2 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 38,639 4 Net Generation (megawatthours) 204,125,596 4 Electric Utilities 96,939,535 8 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 107,186,061 4 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 3 47 Nitrogen Oxide 80 9 Carbon Dioxide 55,406 16 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) * 49 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.9 41 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 598 46 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 258,525,414 2 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 240,948,673 2

358

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Dakota Electricity Profile 2010 South Dakota profile Dakota Electricity Profile 2010 South Dakota profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (South Dakota) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/WECC Primary Energy Source Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 3,623 45 Electric Utilities 2,994 37 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 629 48 Net Generation (megawatthours) 10,049,636 46 Electric Utilities 8,682,448 36 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,367,188 47 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 12 43 Nitrogen Oxide 12 43 Carbon Dioxide 3,611 47 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.6 23 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.6 8 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 792 41 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 11,356,149 46 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 11,356,149 42

359

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Jersey Electricity Profile 2010 New Jersey profile Jersey Electricity Profile 2010 New Jersey profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (New Jersey) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 18,424 22 Electric Utilities 460 43 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 17,964 6 Net Generation (megawatthours) 65,682,494 23 Electric Utilities -186,385 50 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 65,868,878 6 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 14 40 Nitrogen Oxide 15 41 Carbon Dioxide 19,160 37 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.5 45 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.5 48 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 643 43 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 79,179,427 20 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 50,482,035 25

360

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Massachusetts Electricity Profile 2010 Massachusetts profile Massachusetts Electricity Profile 2010 Massachusetts profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Massachusetts) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) NPCC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 13,697 31 Electric Utilities 937 42 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 12,760 8 Net Generation (megawatthours) 42,804,824 34 Electric Utilities 802,906 43 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 42,001,918 10 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 35 31 Nitrogen Oxide 17 38 Carbon Dioxide 20,291 36 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.8 34 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.9 39 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,045 38 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 57,123,422 26 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 31,822,942 34

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Nebraska Electricity Profile 2010 Nebraska profile Nebraska Electricity Profile 2010 Nebraska profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Nebraska) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/SPP Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 7,857 38 Electric Utilities 7,647 30 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 210 50 Net Generation (megawatthours) 36,630,006 36 Electric Utilities 36,242,921 30 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 387,085 50 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 65 24 Nitrogen Oxide 40 30 Carbon Dioxide 24,461 34 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.9 12 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.4 9 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,472 19 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 29,849,460 36 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 29,849,460 35

362

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Montana Electricity Profile 2010 Montana profile Montana Electricity Profile 2010 Montana profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Montana) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) MRO/WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 5,866 41 Electric Utilities 2,340 38 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,526 27 Net Generation (megawatthours) 29,791,181 41 Electric Utilities 6,271,180 39 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 23,520,001 14 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 22 35 Nitrogen Oxide 21 35 Carbon Dioxide 20,370 35 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.6 35 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.6 22 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,507 18 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 13,423,138 41 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 10,803,422 43

363

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Maine Electricity Profile 2010 Maine profile Maine Electricity Profile 2010 Maine profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Maine) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) NPCC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 4,430 42 Electric Utilities 19 49 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,410 25 Net Generation (megawatthours) 17,018,660 43 Electric Utilities 1,759 49 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 17,016,901 22 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 12 42 Nitrogen Oxide 8 44 Carbon Dioxide 4,948 44 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.6 36 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.1 33 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 641 44 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 11,531,568 45 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 151,588 51 Energy-Only Provider Sales (megawatthours) 11,379,980 10

364

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Texas Electricity Profile 2010 Texas profile Texas Electricity Profile 2010 Texas profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Texas) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC/SPP/TRE/WECC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 108,258 1 Electric Utilities 26,533 4 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 81,724 1 Net Generation (megawatthours) 411,695,046 1 Electric Utilities 95,099,161 9 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 316,595,885 1 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 430 2 Nitrogen Oxide 204 1 Carbon Dioxide 251,409 1 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.3 28 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.1 32 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,346 22 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 358,457,550 1 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 358,457,550 1

365

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Florida Electricity Profile 2010 Florida profile Florida Electricity Profile 2010 Florida profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Florida) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) FRCC/SERC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 59,147 3 Electric Utilities 50,853 1 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,294 13 Net Generation (megawatthours) 229,095,935 3 Electric Utilities 206,062,185 1 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 23,033,750 15 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 160 11 Nitrogen Oxide 101 5 Carbon Dioxide 123,811 2 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.5 37 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 35 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,191 31 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 231,209,614 3 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 231,209,614 3

366

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Hawaii Electricity Profile 2010 Hawaii profile Hawaii Electricity Profile 2010 Hawaii profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Hawaii) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) -- Primary Energy Source Petroleum Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 2,536 47 Electric Utilities 1,828 40 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 708 47 Net Generation (megawatthours) 10,836,036 45 Electric Utilities 6,416,068 38 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,419,968 38 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 17 36 Nitrogen Oxide 21 36 Carbon Dioxide 8,287 42 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 3.4 16 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 4.3 2 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,686 13 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 10,016,509 48 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 10,016,509 44

367

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Connecticut Electricity Profile 2010 Connecticut profile Connecticut Electricity Profile 2010 Connecticut profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Connecticut) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) NPCC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 8,284 35 Electric Utilities 160 46 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,124 15 Net Generation (megawatthours) 33,349,623 40 Electric Utilities 65,570 45 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 33,284,053 11 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 2 48 Nitrogen Oxide 7 45 Carbon Dioxide 9,201 41 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.1 48 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.5 49 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 608 45 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 30,391,766 35 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 13,714,958 40

368

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Connecticut Electricity Profile 2010 Connecticut profile Connecticut Electricity Profile 2010 Connecticut profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Connecticut) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) NPCC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 8,284 35 Electric Utilities 160 46 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 8,124 15 Net Generation (megawatthours) 33,349,623 40 Electric Utilities 65,570 45 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 33,284,053 11 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 2 48 Nitrogen Oxide 7 45 Carbon Dioxide 9,201 41 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.1 48 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.5 49 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 608 45 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 30,391,766 35 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 13,714,958 40

369

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Utah Electricity Profile 2010 Utah profile Utah Electricity Profile 2010 Utah profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Utah) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 7,497 39 Electric Utilities 6,648 32 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 849 44 Net Generation (megawatthours) 42,249,355 35 Electric Utilities 39,522,124 29 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,727,231 43 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 25 34 Nitrogen Oxide 68 13 Carbon Dioxide 35,519 27 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.3 38 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 3.6 4 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,853 9 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 28,044,001 37 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 28,044,001 36

370

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Carolina Electricity Profile 2010 South Carolina profile Carolina Electricity Profile 2010 South Carolina profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (South Carolina) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 23,982 17 Electric Utilities 22,172 9 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 1,810 35 Net Generation (megawatthours) 104,153,133 14 Electric Utilities 100,610,887 6 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,542,246 39 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 106 19 Nitrogen Oxide 30 33 Carbon Dioxide 41,364 23 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.2 30 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.6 45 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 876 40 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 82,479,293 19 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 82,479,293 17

371

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Alaska Electricity Profile 2010 Alaska profile Alaska Electricity Profile 2010 Alaska profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Alaska) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) -- Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 2,067 48 Electric Utilities 1,889 39 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 178 51 Net Generation (megawatthours) 6,759,576 48 Electric Utilities 6,205,050 40 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 554,526 49 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 3 46 Nitrogen Oxide 16 39 Carbon Dioxide 4,125 46 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 41 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 5.2 1 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,345 23 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 6,247,038 50 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 6,247,038 47

372

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Nevada Electricity Profile 2010 Nevada profile Nevada Electricity Profile 2010 Nevada profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Nevada) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 11,421 34 Electric Utilities 8,713 29 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 2,708 33 Net Generation (megawatthours) 35,146,248 38 Electric Utilities 23,710,917 34 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 11,435,331 29 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 7 44 Nitrogen Oxide 15 40 Carbon Dioxide 17,020 38 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.4 46 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.0 37 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,068 37 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 33,772,595 33 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 32,348,879 32

373

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Washington Electricity Profile 2010 Washington profile Washington Electricity Profile 2010 Washington profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Washington) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 30,478 10 Electric Utilities 26,498 5 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,979 26 Net Generation (megawatthours) 103,472,729 15 Electric Utilities 88,057,219 14 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 15,415,510 23 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 14 39 Nitrogen Oxide 21 37 Carbon Dioxide 13,984 39 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.3 47 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.4 50 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 298 49 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 90,379,970 16 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 88,116,958 14

374

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Oregon Electricity Profile 2010 Oregon profile Oregon Electricity Profile 2010 Oregon profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Oregon) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 14,261 29 Electric Utilities 10,846 27 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,415 28 Net Generation (megawatthours) 55,126,999 27 Electric Utilities 41,142,684 26 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 13,984,316 26 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 16 37 Nitrogen Oxide 15 42 Carbon Dioxide 10,094 40 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.6 44 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.6 47 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 404 48 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 46,025,945 30 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 44,525,865 29

375

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Texas Electricity Profile 2010 Texas profile Texas Electricity Profile 2010 Texas profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Texas) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SERC/SPP/TRE/WECC Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 108,258 1 Electric Utilities 26,533 4 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 81,724 1 Net Generation (megawatthours) 411,695,046 1 Electric Utilities 95,099,161 9 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 316,595,885 1 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 430 2 Nitrogen Oxide 204 1 Carbon Dioxide 251,409 1 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.3 28 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 1.1 32 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,346 22 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 358,457,550 1 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 358,457,550 1

376

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Indiana Electricity Profile 2010 Indiana profile Indiana Electricity Profile 2010 Indiana profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Indiana) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Coal Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 27,638 13 Electric Utilities 23,008 8 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 4,630 23 Net Generation (megawatthours) 125,180,739 11 Electric Utilities 107,852,560 5 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 17,328,179 20 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 385 4 Nitrogen Oxide 120 4 Carbon Dioxide 116,283 5 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 6.8 4 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.1 12 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2,048 4 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 105,994,376 11 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 105,994,376 8

377

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Oklahoma Electricity Profile 2010 Oklahoma profile Oklahoma Electricity Profile 2010 Oklahoma profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Oklahoma) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) SPP Primary Energy Source Gas Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 21,022 20 Electric Utilities 16,015 18 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 5,006 17 Net Generation (megawatthours) 72,250,733 22 Electric Utilities 57,421,195 17 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 14,829,538 24 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 85 21 Nitrogen Oxide 71 12 Carbon Dioxide 49,536 17 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 2.6 24 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 2.2 11 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1,512 17 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 57,845,980 25 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 57,845,980 23

378

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Jersey Electricity Profile 2010 New Jersey profile Jersey Electricity Profile 2010 New Jersey profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (New Jersey) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) RFC Primary Energy Source Nuclear Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 18,424 22 Electric Utilities 460 43 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 17,964 6 Net Generation (megawatthours) 65,682,494 23 Electric Utilities -186,385 50 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 65,868,878 6 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 14 40 Nitrogen Oxide 15 41 Carbon Dioxide 19,160 37 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 0.5 45 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.5 48 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 643 43 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 79,179,427 20 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 50,482,035 25

379

EIA - State Electricity Profiles  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Idaho Electricity Profile 2010 Idaho profile Idaho Electricity Profile 2010 Idaho profile Table 1. 2010 Summary Statistics (Idaho) Item Value U.S. Rank NERC Region(s) WECC Primary Energy Source Hydroelectric Net Summer Capacity (megawatts) 3,990 44 Electric Utilities 3,035 36 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 955 42 Net Generation (megawatthours) 12,024,564 44 Electric Utilities 8,589,208 37 Independent Power Producers & Combined Heat and Power 3,435,356 40 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sulfur Dioxide 7 45 Nitrogen Oxide 4 48 Carbon Dioxide 1,213 49 Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 1.2 39 Nitrogen Oxide (lbs/MWh) 0.8 43 Carbon Dioxide (lbs/MWh) 222 50 Total Retail Sales (megawatthours) 22,797,668 38 Full Service Provider Sales (megawatthours) 22,797,668 37

380

Third Generation Flywheels for electric storage  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Electricity is critical to our economy, but growth in demand has saturated the power grid causing instability and blackouts. The economic penalty due to lost productivity in the US exceeds $100 billion per year. Opposition to new transmission lines and power plants, environmental restrictions, and an expected $100 billion grid upgrade cost have slowed system improvements. Flywheel electricity storage could provide a more economical, environmentally benign alternative and slash economic losses if units could be scaled up in a cost effective manner to much larger power and capacity than the present maximum of a few hundred kW and a few kWh per flywheel. The goal of this project is to design, construct, and demonstrate a small-scale third generation electricity storage flywheel using a revolutionary architecture scalable to megawatt-hours per unit. First generation flywheels are built from bulk materials such as steel and provide inertia to smooth the motion of mechanical devices such as engines. They can be scaled up to tens of tons or more, but have relatively low energy storage density. Second generation flywheels use similar designs but are fabricated with composite materials such as carbon fiber and epoxy. They are capable of much higher energy storage density but cannot economically be built larger than a few kWh of storage capacity due to structural and stability limitations. LaunchPoint is developing a third generation flywheel the "Power Ring" with energy densities as high or higher than second generation flywheels and a totally new architecture scalable to enormous sizes. Electricity storage capacities exceeding 5 megawatt-hours per unit appear both technically feasible and economically attractive. Our design uses a new class of magnetic bearing a radial gap shear-force levitator that we discovered and patented, and a thin-walled composite hoop rotated at high speed to store kinetic energy. One immediate application is power grid frequency regulation, where Power Rings could cut costs, reduce fuel consumption, eliminate emissions, and reduce the need for new power plants. Other applications include hybrid diesel-electric locomotives, grid power quality, support for renewable energy, spinning reserve, energy management, and facility deferral. Decreased need for new generation and transmission alone could save the nation $2.5 billion per year. Improved grid reliability could cut economic losses due to poor power quality by tens of billions of dollars per year. A large export market for this technology could also develop. Power Ring technology will directly support the EERE mission, and the goals of the Distributed Energy Technologies Subprogram in particular, by helping to reduce blackouts, brownouts, electricity costs, and emissions, by relieving transmission bottlenecks, and by greatly improving grid power quality.

Ricci, Michael, R.; Fiske, O. James

2008-02-29T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Distributed energy resources customer adoption modeling with combined heat and power applications  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MWh) KA natural gas consumed by power generation (MWh LMWh) KA natural gas consumed by power generation (MWh) LMWh) KA natural gas consumed by power generation (MWh) L

Siddiqui, Afzal S.; Firestone, Ryan M.; Ghosh, Srijay; Stadler, Michael; Edwards, Jennifer L.; Marnay, Chris

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

Texas Senate Bill 5 Legislation for Reducing Pollution in Non-Attainment and Affected Areas: An Overview of Legislative Responsibilities, Code Compliance Issues and Accomplishments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The 77th Texas Legislature, in 2001, established Senate Bill 5, SB-5, which addressed NOx emission reductions by establishing programs to reduce vehicle emissions and reductions due to energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy sources. The 78th Texas Legislature further expanded SB-5 into code certification for code officials and above code programs. Using data available from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, TCEQ, the EPA and new procedures developed by the Laboratory, the annual energy savings calculated in 2003 from energy-code compliant new residential construction in non-attainment and affected counties were 252,238 megawatt hours of electricity and 887,564 million Btu of natural gas. The resultant annual NOx reductions were 473 tons. On a peak summer day in 2003, the NOx emissions were 2.44 tons. SB-5 recognized Energy Efficiency / Renewable Energy, EE/RE, as a valid method to reduce emissions. The Energy Systems Laboratory was made responsible for achieving the following goals. 1. Quantify the NOx reductions from EE/RE by county. 2. Assist cities and counties determine the impact of code amendments that they planned to adopt. 3. Conduct training on the IRC / IECC, including ASHRAE 90.1. 4. Set up a certification program for code officials. 5. Assist cities and counties to achieve above code performance. 6. Translate the EE/RE savings into EPA acceptable emissions reductions which can be applied to the State Implementation Plan, SIP.

Culp, C.; Haberl, J. S.; Yazdani, B.; Fitzpatrick, T.; Bryant, J. A.; Turner, W. D.

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

383

Can Deployment of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency PutDownward Pressure on Natural Gas Prices  

SciTech Connect

High and volatile natural gas prices have increasingly led to calls for investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency. One line of argument is that deployment of these resources may lead to reductions in the demand for and price of natural gas. Many recent U.S.-based modeling studies have demonstrated that this effect could provide significant consumer savings. In this article we evaluate these studies, and benchmark their findings against economic theory, other modeling results, and a limited empirical literature. We find that many uncertainties remain regarding the absolute magnitude of this effect, and that the reduction in natural gas prices may not represent an increase in aggregate economic wealth. Nonetheless, we conclude that many of the studies of the impact of renewable energy and energy efficiency on natural gas prices appear to have represented this effect within reason, given current knowledge. These studies specifically suggest that a 1% reduction in U.S. natural gas demand could lead to long-term average wellhead price reductions of 0.8% to 2%, and that each megawatt-hour of renewable energy and energy efficiency may benefit natural gas consumers to the tune of at least $7.5 to $20.

Wiser, Ryan; Bolinger, Mark

2005-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

Philadelphia Navy Yard: UESC Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Navy Yard Navy Yard UESC project with PGW ESCO Perspective Presented by Christopher Abbuehl Constellation Energy Integrated Energy Company * Generation - 12,000+ megawatts of owned generating capacity (fossil, nuclear &renewable ) * Electric Commodity - 62 million MWH peak load served to retail power customers (2010) Trusted supplier to 2/3 of the Fortune 100 * Gas Commodity - 334 million mmBTUs of natural gas delivered in open retail markets (2010) * Owns Baltimore Gas and Electric ESCO Services * More than 25 years of comprehensive energy projects through performance contracting. * Over 4,000 Energy Savings Projects implemented for large governmental, institutional, and private sector customers Constellation Energy Key Facts 2 * Established: 1816 *

385

AN 80 MEGAWATT AQUEOUS HOMOGENEOUS BURNER REACTOR. Reactor Design and Feasibility Problem  

SciTech Connect

An 80 Mw aqueous homogeneous burner reactor suitable for producing 20 Mw of electricity at a remote location is described. The reactor fuel consists of a light water uranyl sulfate solution which acts as its own moderator and coolant. The uranium is highly enriched (93% U/sup 235/). The primary considerstions for the design were simplicity and reliability of the components, automatic demand control and safe for any load change, full xenon override not required, possibility of construction within the immediate future, and economic operation not the cortrolling factor. Reasonably complete studies are presented for the reactor physics, safety, stability, chemistry, hent transfer, and operation of the system. (auth)

Chapman, R.H.; Collins, H.L.; Dollard, W.J.; Fieno, D.; Hernandez- Fragoso, J.; Miller, J.W.; von Hollen, H.; Wheeler, C.V.

1957-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

386

Economic Development Impacts of Colorado's First 1000 Megawatts of Wind Energy  

SciTech Connect

This report analyzes the economic impacts of the installation of 1000 MW of wind power in the state of Colorado.

Reategui, S.; Tegen, S.

2008-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

387

Scaling considerations for a multi-megawatt class supercritical CO2 brayton cycle and commercialization.  

SciTech Connect

Small-scale supercritical CO2 demonstration loops are successful at identifying the important technical issues that one must face in order to scale up to larger power levels. The Sandia National Laboratories supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle test loops are identifying technical needs to scale the technology to commercial power levels such as 10 MWe. The small size of the Sandia 1 MWth loop has demonstration of the split flow loop efficiency and effectiveness of the Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers (PCHXs) leading to the design of a fully recuperated, split flow, supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle demonstration system. However, there were many problems that were encountered, such as high rotational speeds in the units. Additionally, the turbomachinery in the test loops need to identify issues concerning the bearings, seals, thermal boundaries, and motor controller problems in order to be proved a reliable power source in the 300 kWe range. Although these issues were anticipated in smaller demonstration units, commercially scaled hardware would eliminate these problems caused by high rotational speeds at small scale. The economic viability and development of the future scalable 10 MWe solely depends on the interest of DOE and private industry. The Intellectual Property collected by Sandia proves that the ~10 MWe supercritical CO2 power conversion loop to be very beneficial when coupled to a 20 MWth heat source (either solar, geothermal, fossil, or nuclear). This paper will identify a commercialization plan, as well as, a roadmap from the simple 1 MWth supercritical CO2 development loop to a power producing 10 MWe supercritical CO2 Brayton loop.

Fleming, Darryn D.; Holschuh, Thomas Vernon,; Conboy, Thomas M.; Pasch, James Jay; Wright, Steven Alan; Rochau, Gary Eugene; Fuller, Robert Lynn [Barber-Nichols, Inc., Arvada, CO] [Barber-Nichols, Inc., Arvada, CO

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

Overview of nuclear MHD power conversion for multi-megawatt electric propulsion  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An overview of recent research findings on space applications of nuclear magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) power for generation of multi klb f electric thrust at thousands of seconds of specific impulse is presented. The high operating temperatures of the nuclear MHD system and potential for direct coupling of the output power to the electric thruster system are characterizing features that allow for design of ultracompact and ultralight nuclear electric propulsion systems. Order of magnitude figures for some mission-critical parameters are collated from various engineering analyses. Specific mass and specific impulse values highlight the inherent benefits of further research and development investment in MHD power.

Blair M. Smith; Travis W. Knight; Samim Anghaie

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

A 1 MEGAWATT POLYPHASE BOOST CONVERTER-MODULATOR FOR KLYSTRON PULSE APPLICATION  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes electrical design criteria and first operational results a 140 kV, 1 MW average, 11 MW peak, zero-voltage-switching 20 kHz polyphase bridge, boost converter/modulator for klystron pulse application. The DC-DC converter derives the buss voltages from a standard 13.8 kV to 2300 Y substation cast-core transformer. Energy storage and filtering is provided by self-clearing metallized hazy polypropylene traction capacitors. Three ''H-Bridge'' Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) switching networks are used to generate the polyphase 20 kHz transformer primary drive waveforms. The 20 kHz drive waveforms are chirped the appropriate duration to generate the desired klystron pulse width. PWM (pulse width modulation) of the individual 20 kHz pulses is utilized to provide regulated output waveforms with adaptive feedforward and feedback techniques. The boost transformer design utilizes amorphous nanocrystalline material that provides the required low core loss at design flux levels and switching frequencies. Resonant shunt-peaking is used on the transformer secondary to boost output voltage and resonate transformer leakage inductance. With the appropriate transformer leakage inductance and peaking capacitance, zero-voltage-switching of the IGBT's is attained, minimizing switching losses. A review of these design parameters and the first results of the performance characteristics will be presented.

W.A. REASS; J.D. DOSS; R.F. GRIBBLE

2001-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Measured Radiation and Background Levels During Transmission of Megawatt Electron Beams Through Millimeter Apertures  

SciTech Connect

We report measurements of photon and neutron radiation levels observed while transmitting a 0.43 MW electron beam through millimeter-sized apertures and during beam-off, but accelerating gradient RF-on, operation. These measurements were conducted at the Free-Electron Laser (FEL) facility of the Jefferson National Accelerator Laboratory (JLab) using a 100 MeV electron beam from an energy-recovery linear accelerator. The beam was directed successively through 6 mm, 4 mm, and 2 mm diameter apertures of length 127 mm in aluminum at a maximum current of 4.3 mA (430 kW beam power). This study was conducted to characterize radiation levels for experiments that need to operate in this environment, such as the proposed DarkLight Experiment. We find that sustained transmission of a 430 kW continuous-wave (CW) beam through a 2 mm aperture is feasible with manageable beam-related backgrounds. We also find that during beam-off, RF-on operation, multipactoring inside the niobium cavities of the accelerator cryomodules is the primary source of ambient radiation when the machine is tuned for 130 MeV operation.

Alarcon, Ricardo [Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ (United States); Balascuta, S. [Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ (United States); Benson, Stephen V. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States); Bertozzi, William [Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States); Boyce, James R. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States); Cowan, Ray [Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States); Douglas, David R. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States); Evtushenko, Pavel [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States); Fisher, P. [Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States); Ihloff, Ernest E. [Hampton University, Hampton, VA (United States); Kalantarians, Narbe [Hampton University, Hampton, VA (United States); Kelleher, Aidan Michael [Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States); Krossler, W. J. [William and Mary College, Williamsburg, VA (United States); Legg, Robert A. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States); Long, Elena [University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States); Milner, Richard [Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States); Neil, George R. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States); Ou, Longwu [Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States); Schmookler, Barack Abraham [Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States); Tennant, Christopher D. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States); Tschalar, C. [Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (United States); Williams, Gwyn P. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States); Zhang, Shukui [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States)

2013-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

391

A SODIUM-GRAPHITE REACTOR STEAM-ELECTRIC STATION FOR 75 MEGAWATTS NET GENERATION  

SciTech Connect

The major design features, nuclear characteristics and performance data for a nuclear fueled central station power plant of 75,000 kw net capacity are presented. The heat source is a Na cooled graphite moderated reactor. The design of the reactor takes full advantage of the experience gained to date on the Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE); the plant described here is a straightforward extension of the smaller experimental SRE, which is now under construction. The fuel elements are made up of rod clusters and the moderator is in the form of Zr canned graphite elements. The performance of the reactor has been based on conservative temperatures and coolant flow velocities which result in a plant with "built-in reserve." Thus, as experience is gained and anticipated improvements in reactor fuel elements and construction materials are proven, the performance of the plant can be increased accordingly. Two reactor designs are described, one for operation with slightly enriched U fuel elements and the other for operation with Th--U fuel elements. The associated heat exchangers, pumps, steam, and electrical generating equipment are identical for either reactor design. An analysis of turbine cycles describes the particular cycle chosen for initial operation and discusses a method by which modern central station performance can be initially obtained. The design and performance data which are required to enable reliable estimates of the plant construction and operating costs to be made are established. (auth)

Weisner, E.F.; Sybert, W.M.

1955-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

392

Economic Development Impacts of Colorado's First 1000 Megawatts of Wind Energy  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report analyzes the economic impacts of the installation of 1000 MW of wind power in the state of Colorado.

Reategui, S.; Tegen, S.

2008-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

A feasibility study for a one-megawatt pulsed spallation source at Los Alamos National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

Over the past two decades, high-intensity proton accelerators have been designed and developed to support nuclear physics research and defense applications. This technology has now matured to the point where it can support simultaneous and cost-effective exploitation of a number of important areas of both basic and applied science. Examples include neutron scattering, the production of radioisotopes, tests of technologies to transmute nuclear waste, radiation damage studies, nuclear physics, and muon spin research. As part of a larger program involving these and other areas, a team at Los Alamos National Laboratory has undertaken a feasibility study for a 1-MW pulsed spallation neutron source (PSS) based on the use of an 800-MeV proton linac and an accumulator ring. In January 1994, the feasibility study was reviewed by a large, international group of experts in the design of accelerators and neutron spallation targets. This group confirmed the viability of the proposed neutron source. In this paper, I describe the approach Los Alamos has taken to the feasibility study, which has involved a synergistic application of the Laboratory`s expertise in nuclear science and technology, computation, and particle-beam technologies. Several examples of problems resolved by the study are described, including chopping of low-energy proton beam, interactions between H{sup {minus}} particles and the stripper foil used to produce protons for injection into an accumulator ring, and the inclusion of engineering realities into the design of a neutron production target. These examples are chosen to illustrate the breadth of the expertise that has been brought to bear on the feasibility study and to demonstrate that there are real R&D issues that need to be resolved before a next-generation spoliation source can be built.

Pynn, R.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

Megatons to Megawatts program will conclude at the end of 2013 | U ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Have a question, comment, or suggestion for a future article? Send your feedback to todayinenergy@eia.gov

395

Utility Test Results of a 2-Megawatt, 10-Second Reserve-Power System  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report documents the 1996 evaluation by Pacific Gas and Electric Company of an advanced reserve-power system capable of supporting 2 MW of load for 10 seconds. The system, developed under a DOE Cooperative Agreement with AC Battery Corporation of East Troy, Wisconsin, contains battery storage that enables industrial facilities to ''ride through'' momentary outages. The evaluation consisted of tests of system performance using a wide variety of load types and operating conditions. The tests, which included simulated utility outages and voltage sags, demonstrated that the system could provide continuous power during utility outages and other disturbances and that it was compatible with a variety of load types found at industrial customer sites.

BALL,GREG J.; NORRIS,BENJAMIN L.

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

396

OTEC-1 power system test program: performance of one-megawatt heat exchangers  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Heat exchanger test results for the first deployment of OTEC-1 are reported. These tests were aimed at evaluating the performance of a state-of-the-art, 1-MWe titanium shell-and-tube evaporator and condenser in an ocean environment. The evaporator consisted of both a plain and an enhanced (Union Carbide High Flux) tube bundle, whereas the condenser had plain tubes only. All tests with the evaporator were conducted in the sprayed-bundle mode. Experimental results for the condenser and plain-tube portion of the evaporator were in excellent agreement with performance predictions. This result demonstrates that the thermal performance of large plain-tube heat exchangers can be predicted with a high level of confidence. However, the performance of the enhanced-tube portion of the evaporator was much lower thn predicted. Evidence strongly suggested that this poor performance was attributable mainly to fouling of the High Flux surface by corrosion products consisting predominantly of hydrated aluminum oxides.

Lorenz, J.J.; Yung, D.; Howard, P.A.; Panchal, C.B.; Poucher, F.W.

1981-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

397

5-Megawatt solar-thermal test facility: facility construction-cost analysis  

SciTech Connect

The appropriation analysis, cash flow analysis, monthly cash flow analysis and construction cost estimate are tabulated for the 1 MW And 5 MW test facilities based upon limited initial appropriations, including work sheets for the construction cost estimates. (LEW)

1975-12-08T23:59:59.000Z

398

Commissioning and Start Up of a 110 MegaWatt Cogeneration Facility  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

"In December of 1987, Union Carbide successfully brought on line a 110,000 KVA combined cycle cogeneration facility. The construction, commissioning and start up of this complex facility was accomplished in a remarkably short twelve months. As with all projects of any magnitude, there were several technical challenges that developed during the course of the year. These challenges and the Project Team response will be discussed in some detail. Some areas include: 1. Procurement 2. Technical review of specs and drawings 3. Existing manufacturing facility constraints 4. Mechanical problems 5. Electrical problems 6. Control system / instrumentation problems The commissioning and start up had to be coordinated with existing Plant operations. As a result of the Project Team's efforts, the cogeneration facility achieved 100% of design output on December 22, 1987 without any significant impact on the manufacturing facility."

Good, R.

1988-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

399

Megatons to Megawatts program will conclude at the end of 2013 ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

This Week in Petroleum Weekly Petroleum Status Report ... The program will end in December 2013. ... U.S. Department of Energy USA.gov FedStats. Stay Connected

400

reduced demand for power by nearly 1,500 megawatts through investments in energy  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

://www.nwcouncil.org/news/2003_04/powerB.pdf · Agriculture, 25; · Non-aluminum industries, 350; · Commercial non efficiencies in things like irrigation systems, and most recently, in the dairy industry. One improvement plate heat exchangers," comprised of stainless steel tubes alongside each other, they can accom- plish

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

reduced demand for power by nearly 1,500 megawatts through investments in energy  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

increased the efficiency of electricity usage in the Pacific Northwest by the equivalent of more than two and will benefit salmon and steelhead in the lower Columbia River as well as fish in the rivers and storage res for electricity, the region's utilities and the federal Bonneville Power Administration have Report: Conservation

402

Application of Nd-Fe-B Magnets to the Megawatt Scale Generator for ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Various technologies for wind power generators such as interior permanent magnet (IPM) motors and surface permanent magnet (SPM) motors have been...

403

Earthquake Response Modeling for a Parked and Operating Megawatt-Scale Wind Turbine  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Demand parameters for turbines, such as tower moment demand, are primarily driven by wind excitation and dynamics associated with operation. For that purpose, computational simulation platforms have been developed, such as FAST, maintained by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). For seismically active regions, building codes also require the consideration of earthquake loading. Historically, it has been common to use simple building code approaches to estimate the structural demand from earthquake shaking, as an independent loading scenario. Currently, International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) design requirements include the consideration of earthquake shaking while the turbine is operating. Numerical and analytical tools used to consider earthquake loads for buildings and other static civil structures are not well suited for modeling simultaneous wind and earthquake excitation in conjunction with operational dynamics. Through the addition of seismic loading capabilities to FAST, it is possible to simulate earthquake shaking in the time domain, which allows consideration of non-linear effects such as structural nonlinearities, aerodynamic hysteresis, control system influence, and transients. This paper presents a FAST model of a modern 900-kW wind turbine, which is calibrated based on field vibration measurements. With this calibrated model, both coupled and uncoupled simulations are conducted looking at the structural demand for the turbine tower. Response is compared under the conditions of normal operation and potential emergency shutdown due the earthquake induced vibrations. The results highlight the availability of a numerical tool for conducting such studies, and provide insights into the combined wind-earthquake loading mechanism.

Prowell, I.; Elgamal, A.; Romanowitz, H.; Duggan, J. E.; Jonkman, J.

2010-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

NREL: Wind Research - NWTC to Debut a Dynamic 5-Megawatt Dynamometer  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

can have their wind turbine drivetrains tested in a controlled environment-saving time, money, and risk. Jim Green, project manager, states, "The new dynamometer more...

405

Regional load curve models: specification and estimation of the DRI Model. Final report. [Forecasts of electric loads in 32 US regions  

SciTech Connect

The DRI Model of hourly load curves is developed in this report. The model is capable of producing long-term forecasts for 32 US regions. These regions were created by aggregating hourly system load data from 146 electric utilities. These utilities supply approximately 95% of all electricity consumed in the continental US. The model forecasts electricity demands for each hour of the year for each of the 32 regions. Model output includes forecasts of peak demands, megawatt hour demands, load factors, and load duration curves. The DRI Model is estimated in two stages. In the first stage, for each region and month, hourly electricity demands are parameterized into load components representing the effects of lifestyles and weather on regional loads through a time-series model. In the second stage, the variation in these parameterized load components across months and regions is modeled econometrically in terms of energy prices, income levels, appliance saturation rates, and other variables. The second-stage models are essentially models of electricity demand which are estimated using estimated first-stage parameters as dependent variables, instead of observed demands. Regional price and income demand elasticities are implied by the second-stage models. Moreover, since the dependent variables refer to particular hours of the day, these estimated elasticities are hour-specific. (Since prices did not vary over the day in years when hourly load data were available, hour-to-hour, cross-price elasticities were not estimated.) Integrated system hourly load forecasts are obtained combining the influences of individual customer classes. Finally, approximate customer class hourly load shapes can be produced for each region, though these series may be useful only in research endeavors since they lack the precision available through survey methods.

Platt, H.D.; Einhorn, M.A.; Ignelzi, P.C.; Poirier, D.J.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

Regional load-curve models: scenario and forecast using the DRI model. Final report. [Forecasts of electric power loads in 32 US regions  

SciTech Connect

Regional load curve models were constructed for 32 regions that have been created by aggregating hourly load data from 146 electric utilities. These utilities supply approximately 95% of the electricity consumed in the continental US. The 32 models forecast electricity demands by hour, 8784 regional load forecasts per year. Because projections are made for each hour in the year, contemporaneous forecasts are available for peak demands, megawatt hour demands, load factors, load duration curves, and typical load shapes. The forecast scenario is described and documented in this volume and the forecast resulting from the use of this scenario is presented. The highlights of this forecast are two observations: (1) peak demands will once again become winter phenomena. By the year 2000, 18 of the 32 regions peak in a winter month as compared with the 8 winter peaking regions in 1977. In the heating season, the model is responsive to the number of heating degree-hours, the penetration rate of electric heating equipment, and the rate at which this space conditioning equipment is utilized, which itself is functionally dependent on the level of real electricity prices and real incomes. Thus, as the penetration rate of electric heating equipment increases, winter season demands grow more rapidly than demands in other seasons and peaks begin to appear in winter months; and (2) load factors begin to increase in the forecast, reversing the trend which began in the early 1960s. Nationally, load factors do not leap upwards, instead they increase gradually from .609 in 1977 to .629 in the year 2000. The improvement is more consequential in some regions, with load factors increasing, at times, by .10 or more. In some regions, load factors continue to decline.

Platt, H.D.

1981-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Heat flow and hot dry rock geothermal resources of the Clearlake Region, northern California  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Geysers-Clear Lake geothermal anomaly is an area of high heat flow in northern California. The anomaly is caused by abnormally high heat flows generated by asthenospheric uplift and basaltic magmatic underplating at a slabless window created by passage of the Mendocino Triple Junction. The Clear Lake volcanic field is underlain by magmatic igneous bodies in the form of a stack of sill-form intrusions with silicic bodies generally at the top and basic magmas at the bottom. The tabular shape and wide areal extent of the heat sources results in linear temperature gradients and near-horizontal isotherms in a broad region at the center of the geothermal anomaly. The Hot Dry Rock (HDR) portion of The Geysers-Clear Lake geothermal field is that part of the geothermal anomaly that is external to the steamfield, bounded by geothermal gradients of 167 mW/m2 (4 heat flow units-hfu) and 335 mW/m2 (8 hfu). The HDR resources, to a depth of 5 km, were estimated by piece-wise linear summation based on a sketch map of the heat flow. Approximately, the geothermal {open_quotes}accessible resource base{close_quotes} (Qa) is 1.68E+21 J; the {open_quotes}HDR resource base{close_quotes} (Qha) is 1.39E+21 J; and the {open_quotes}HDR power production resource{close_quotes} (Qhp) is 1.01E+21 J. The HDR power production resource (Qhp) is equivalent to 2.78E+ 11 Mwht (megawatt hours thermal), or 1.72E+11 bbls of oil.

Burns, K.L.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

Advanced Design and Commissioning Tools for Energy-Efficient Building Technologies  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

cooling spray pump (MWh) Fans (including cooling tower fancooling spray pump (MWh) Fans (including cooling tower fancooling spray pump (MWh) Fans (including cooling tower fan

Bauman, Fred; Webster, Tom; Zhang, Hui; Arens, Ed

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

409

A Regional Approach to Market Monitoring in the West  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Mid-C prices ($/MWh) SP15 and PV prices ($/MWh) A Regionalis positive when the PV price is higher. The SP15 price isprice differential ($/MWh) PV price ($/MWh) SP15 price ($/

Barmack, Matthew; Kahn, Edward; Tierney, Susan; Goldman, Charles

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

410

Promoting electricity from renewable energy sources -- lessons learned from the EU, U.S. and Japan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Biomass, Biogas, Landfill gas, Sewage gas, Geothermal)/MWh; Sewage and landfill gas: 45-60 /MWh; Wind OnshoreMWh; Landfill-, Sewage- & Landfill gas: 64.5-74.4 /MWh; PV:

Haas, Reinhard

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Xtreme Power 1.5 MW / 1.0 MWh Dynamic Power Resource (DPR) System Evaluation at the Solar Technology Acceleration Center (SolarTAC)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Utility-scale advanced electrical energy storage has the potential to improve the reliability and efficiency of the energy delivery network and also pave the way for greater additions of variable renewable resources onto the grid. This in mind, Xcel Energy, EPRI, and other stakeholders are engaged in a multi-year project to demonstrate the use of energy storage to support the grid integration of renewablesspecifically, solar PV on the distribution network. To better understand the capabilities of the Xt...

2011-12-29T23:59:59.000Z

412

Xtreme Power 1.5 MW / 1.0 MWh "Solar-to-Battery Demonstration" at the Solar Technology Acceleration Center (SolarTAC)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Utility-scale advanced electrical energy storage has the potential to improve the reliability and efficiency of the energy delivery network and also pave the way for greater additions of variable renewable resources onto the grid. With this in mind, EPRI, Xcel Energy, and other stakeholders are engaged in a multi-year project, known as the Solar-to-Battery (S2B) initiative, to demonstrate the use of utility-scale energy storage to support the grid integration of renewables, specifically, solar ...

2012-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

413

TUBE-TO-TUBESHEET WELDING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS FOR 30 MEGAWATT PROTOTYPE SODIUM INTERMEDIATE HEAT EXCHANGER AND STEAM GENERATOR  

SciTech Connect

Special welding techniques for joining Inconel weld overlays on type 316 stainless steel tubesheets and channels are described. The program for the development of the required welding procadures are divided into three specific progranns: overlaying Inconel filler Metal 82 on type 316 stainless steel, welding type 316 stainless steel tubes to a type 316 stainless steel tubesheet, and welding Inconel-type 316 stainless steel composite tubes to Inconel weld overlaid type 316 tubesheets. Shock tests are described which attempt to assimulate the most drastic thermal transient that could occur in both units and to evaluate the effect of the resulting stresses on the Inconel overlay and the tube-totubesheet welds. (N.W.R.)

1963-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

414

Evaluation of the New B-REX Fatigue Testing System for Multi-Megawatt Wind Turbine Blades: Preprint  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) recently developed a new hybrid fatigue testing system called the Blade Resonance Excitation (B-REX) test system. The new system uses 65% less energy to test large wind turbine blades in half the time of NREL's dual-axis forced-displacement test method with lower equipment and operating costs. The B-REX is a dual-axis test system that combines resonance excitation with forced hydraulic loading to reduce the total test time required while representing the operating strains on the critical inboard blade stations more accurately than a single-axis test system. The analysis and testing required to fully implement the B-REX was significant. To control unanticipated blade motion and vibrations caused by dynamic coupling between the flap, lead-lag, and torsional directions, we needed to incorporate additional test hardware and control software. We evaluated the B-REX test system under stable operating conditions using a combination of various sensors. We then compared our results with results from the same blade, tested previously using NREL's dual-axis forced-displacement test method. Experimental results indicate that strain levels produced by the B-REX system accurately replicated the forced-displacement method. This paper describes the challenges we encountered while developing the new blade fatigue test system and the experimental results that validate its accuracy.

White, D.; Musial, W.; Engberg, S.

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

415

Abstract--The Danish power system starts to face problems of integrating thousands megawatts of wind power, which produce  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the best HVAC transmission line for long distance applications. Compared to HVDC systems, the benefits

Bak-Jensen, Birgitte

416

Marine pastures: a by-product of large (100 megawatt or larger) floating ocean-thermal power plants. Final report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The potential biological productivity of an open-sea mariculture system utilizing the deep-sea water discharged from an ocean-thermal energy conversion (OTEC) plant was investigated. In a series of land-based studies, surface water was used to inoculate deep water and the primary production of the resultant blooms was investigated. Each cubic meter of deep water can produce approximately 2.34 g of phytoplankton protein, and that an OTEC plant discharging deep water at a rate of 4.5 x 10/sup 4/ m/sup 3/ min/sup -1/ could produce 5.3 x 10/sup 7/ kg of phytoplankton protein per 350-day year. A series of land-based shellfish studies indicated that, when fed at a constant rate of 1.83 x 10/sup -3/ g of protein per second per 70-140 g of whole wet weight, the clam, Tapes japonica, could convert the phytoplankton protein-nitrogen into shellfish meat protein-nitrogen with an efficiency of about 33 per cent. Total potential wet meat weight production from an OTEC plant pumping 4.5 x 10/sup 4/ m/sup 3/ min/sup -1/ is approximately 4.14 x 10/sup 8/ kg for a 350-day year. Various factors affecting the feasibility of open-sea mariculture are discussed. It is recommended that future work concentrate on a technical and economic analysis. (WDM)

Laurence, S.; Roels, O.A.

1976-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

417

Project Financial Summary Report Concerning Financing Surface Facilities for a 50 Megawatt Geothermal Electric Power Plant Facility in Utah  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes the economic and financial conditions pertaining to geothermal electric power plant utilization of geothermal fluids produced from the Roosevelt Hot springs area of Utah. The first year of electric power generation is scheduled to be 1982. The non-resource facilities will be called ''surface facilities'' and include the gathering system, the power plant, the substation, and the injection system.

1978-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

418

Presented at Solar World Congress, Beijing, September 18 22 2007 PARABOLOIDAL DISH SOLAR CONCENTRATORS FOR MULTI-MEGAWATT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the standard turbine / generator technology. Trough concentrators use parabolic trough mirrors to produce of magnitude lower. Concentrating Solar Power systems via trough systems, have a strong track record, with 354 a linear focus on a receiver that moves with the trough as it tracks the sun, Linear Fresnel systems use

419

Project Financial Summary Report Concerning Financing Surface Facilities for a 50 Megawatt Geothermal Electric Power Plant Facility in Utah  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the economic and financial conditions pertaining to geothermal electric power plant utilization of geothermal fluids produced from the Roosevelt Hot springs area of Utah. The first year of electric power generation is scheduled to be 1982. The non-resource facilities will be called ''surface facilities'' and include the gathering system, the power plant, the substation, and the injection system.

None

1978-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

420

Low Wind Speed Technology Phase I: Prototype Multi-Megawatt Low Wind Speed Turbine; General Electric Wind Energy, LLC  

SciTech Connect

This fact sheet describes a subcontract with GE Wind Energy to develop an advanced prototype turbine to significantly reduce energy costs (COE) in low wind speed environments.

2006-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

"YEAR","MONTH","STATE","UTILITY CODE","UTILITY NAME","NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL AMR METERS","NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL AMR METERS","NUMBER OF INDUSTRIAL AMR METERS","NUMBER OF TRANSPORTATION AMR METERS","TOTAL NUMBER OF AMR METERS","NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL AMI METERS","NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL AMI METERS","NUMBER OF INDUSTRIAL AMI METERS","NUMBER OF TRANSPORTATION AMI METERS","TOTAL NUMBER OF AMI METERS","RESIDENTIAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","COMMERCIAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","TOTAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,1,"AK",213,"Alaska Electric Light&Power Co",9111,782,58,0,9951,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 1,1,"AK",213,"Alaska Electric Light&Power Co",9111,782,58,0,9951,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2011,1,"AK",1651,"Bethel Utilities Corp",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2011,1,"AK",10210,"Ketchikan Public Utilities",0,0,0,0,0,2974,264,2,0,3240,4461,786,114,0,5361 2011,1,"AK",10433,"Kodiak Electric Assn Inc",4574,976,101,0,5651,,,,,0,,,,,0 2011,1,"AK",11824,"Matanuska Electric Assn Inc",47365,3590,,,50955,,,,,0,,,,,0 2011,1,"AK",19558,"Homer Electric Assn Inc",24337,2482,0,0,26819,31,4,0,0,35,1.29,0.01,0,0,1.31 2011,1,"AL",195,"Alabama Power Co",,,,,,1227639,172463,5845,0,1405947,1548871.17,1047712.67,1805530.5,0,4402114.33

422

"YEAR","MONTH","STATE","UTILITY CODE","UTILITY NAME","NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL AMR METERS","NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL AMR METERS","NUMBER OF INDUSTRIAL AMR METERS","NUMBER OF TRANSPORTATION AMR METERS","TOTAL NUMBER OF AMR METERS","NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL AMI METERS","NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL AMI METERS","NUMBER OF INDUSTRIAL AMI METERS","NUMBER OF TRANSPORTATION AMI METERS","TOTAL NUMBER OF AMI METERS","RESIDENTIAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","COMMERCIAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","TOTAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2,1,"AK",213,"Alaska Electric Light&Power Co",10105,925,62,0,11092,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2,1,"AK",213,"Alaska Electric Light&Power Co",10105,925,62,0,11092,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2012,1,"AK",3522,"Chugach Electric Assn Inc",77639,,,,77639,,,,,0,,,,,0 2012,1,"AK",7353,"Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc",37816,6372,488,,44676,,,,,0,,,,,0 2012,1,"AK",10210,"Ketchikan Public Utilities",0,0,0,0,0,3262,312,0,0,3574,5074.17,742.17,0,0,5816.34 2012,1,"AK",10433,"Kodiak Electric Assn Inc",4574,1018,100,,5692,,,,,0,,,,,0 2012,1,"AK",10451,"Kotzebue Electric Assn Inc",915,6,,,921,,,,,0,,,,,0 2012,1,"AK",11824,"Matanuska Electric Assn Inc",47769,3513,0,0,51282,,,,,0,,,,,0 2012,1,"AK",19558,"Homer Electric Assn Inc",24988,2579,,,27567,41,5,,,46,2.05,0.06,,,2.1

423

"YEAR","MONTH","STATE","UTILITY CODE","UTILITY NAME","NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL AMR METERS","NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL AMR METERS","NUMBER OF INDUSTRIAL AMR METERS","NUMBER OF TRANSPORTATION AMR METERS","TOTAL NUMBER OF AMR METERS","NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL AMI METERS","NUMBER OF COMMERCIAL AMI METERS","NUMBER OF INDUSTRIAL AMI METERS","NUMBER OF TRANSPORTATION AMI METERS","TOTAL NUMBER OF AMI METERS","RESIDENTIAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","COMMERCIAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","INDUSTRIAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","TRANSPORTATION ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)","TOTAL ENERGY SERVED THRU AMI METERS (MWh)"  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3,1,"AK",213,"Alaska Electric Light&Power Co",10789,1063,76,0,11928,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 3,1,"AK",213,"Alaska Electric Light&Power Co",10789,1063,76,0,11928,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"AK",3522,"Chugach Electric Assn Inc",69377,8707,,,78084,,,,,0,,,,,0 2013,1,"AK",7353,"Golden Valley Elec Assn Inc",38017,6318,503,,44838,,,,,0,,,,,0 2013,1,"AK",10210,"Ketchikan Public Utilities",0,0,0,0,0,3437,350,0,0,3787,5208.03,789.27,0,0,5997.31 2013,1,"AK",10433,"Kodiak Electric Assn Inc",4585,1038,105,0,5728,,,,,0,,,,,0 2013,1,"AK",10451,"Kotzebue Electric Assn Inc",915,6,0,0,921,,,,,0,,,,,0 2013,1,"AK",11824,"Matanuska Electric Assn Inc",47829,3616,0,0,51445,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 2013,1,"AK",19558,"Homer Electric Assn Inc",25421,2737,,,28158,46,6,,,52,2.37,0.87,,,3.24

424

SAS Output  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

5. Unit of Measure Equivalents 5. Unit of Measure Equivalents Unit Equivalent Kilowatt (kW) 1,000 (One Thousand) Watts Megawatt (MW) 1,000,000 (One Million) Watts Gigawatt (GW) 1,000,000,000 (One Billion) Watts Terawatt (TW) 1,000,000,000,000 (One Trillion) Watts Gigawatt 1,000,000 (One Million) Kilowatts Thousand Gigawatts 1,000,000,000 (One Billion) Kilowatts Kilowatthours (kWh) 1,000 (One Thousand) Watthours Megawatthours (MWh) 1,000,000 (One Million) Watthours Gigawatthours (GWh) 1,000,000,000 (One Billion) Watthours Terawatthours (TWh) 1,000,000,000,000 (One Trillion) Watthours Gigawatthours 1,000,000 (One Million) Kilowatthours Thousand Gigawatthours 1,000,000,000(One Billion Kilowatthours U.S. Dollar 1,000 (One Thousand) Mills U.S. Cent 10 (Ten) Mills Barrel of Oil 42 Gallons

425

2.1E Sample Run Book  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

ELECTR LOAD (MWH) WASTED RCVRABL ENERGY (HB'rU) FUEL INPUTELECTR LOAD (MWH) WASTED RCVRABL ENERGY (HB'rU) FUEL INPUTELE_:TR LOAD (MWH) WASTED RCVRABL ENERGY (MSTU) FUEL INPUT

Winkelmann, F.C.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

The Current and Historical Monthly Retail Sales, Revenues and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

(MWh)","Other Sales (MWh)","All Sector Sales (MWh)","Average Retail Price Residential (ckWh)","Average Retail Price Commercial (ckWh)","Average Retail Price Industrial (c...

427

LIRR High-Speed Flywheel Demonstration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

approximately 23% of New York State electricity needs 2006 Generation: 26.9MM MWh 75% hydro; 25% fossil 2006 energy sales: 42.9MM MWh (includes 16.5MM MWh purchased power)...

428

Promoting electricity from renewable energy sources -- lessons learned from the EU, U.S. and Japan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of large-scale integration of wind power in the electricityintegration in buildings") up to 550 /MWh; Sewage and landfill gas: 45-60 /MWh; Wind

Haas, Reinhard

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

Case Study: Grand Junction VA Medical Center  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Expansion Data - Building Additions - PV Solar Array www.antaresgroupinc.com Key Energy Usage Characteristics * Electricity Use: - Summer (Max.): 494 MWh - Winter (Min.): 367 MWh -...

430

Energy Transmission and Infrastructure  

SciTech Connect

The objective of Energy Transmission and Infrastructure Northern Ohio (OH) was to lay the conceptual and analytical foundation for an energy economy in northern Ohio that will: improve the efficiency with which energy is used in the residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and transportation sectors for Oberlin, Ohio as a district-wide model for Congressional District OH-09; identify the potential to deploy wind and solar technologies and the most effective configuration for the regional energy system (i.e., the ratio of distributed or centralized power generation); analyze the potential within the district to utilize farm wastes to produce biofuels; enhance long-term energy security by identifying ways to deploy local resources and building Ohio-based enterprises; identify the policy, regulatory, and financial barriers impeding development of a new energy system; and improve energy infrastructure within Congressional District OH-09. This objective of laying the foundation for a renewable energy system in Ohio was achieved through four primary areas of activity: 1. district-wide energy infrastructure assessments and alternative-energy transmission studies; 2. energy infrastructure improvement projects undertaken by American Municipal Power (AMP) affiliates in the northern Ohio communities of Elmore, Oak Harbor, and Wellington; 3. Oberlin, OH-area energy assessment initiatives; and 4. a district-wide conference held in September 2011 to disseminate year-one findings. The grant supported 17 research studies by leading energy, policy, and financial specialists, including studies on: current energy use in the district and the Oberlin area; regional potential for energy generation from renewable sources such as solar power, wind, and farm-waste; energy and transportation strategies for transitioning the City of Oberlin entirely to renewable resources and considering pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transportation as well as drivers in developing transportation policies; energy audits and efficiency studies for Oberlin-area businesses and Oberlin College; identification of barriers to residential energy efficiency and development of programming to remove these barriers; mapping of the solar-photovoltaic and wind-energy supply chains in northwest Ohio; and opportunities for vehicle sharing and collaboration among the ten organizations in Lorain County from the private, government, non-profit, and educational sectors. With non-grant funds, organizations have begun or completed projects that drew on the findings of the studies, including: creation of a residential energy-efficiency program for the Oberlin community; installation of energy-efficient lighting in Oberlin College facilities; and development by the City of Oberlin and Oberlin College of a 2.27 megawatt solar photovoltaic facility that is expected to produce 3,000 megawatt-hours of renewable energy annually, 12% of the Colleges yearly power needs. Implementation of these and other projects is evidence of the economic feasibility and technical effectiveness of grant-supported studies, and additional projects are expected to advance to implementation in the coming years. The public has benefited through improved energydelivery systems and reduced energy use for street lighting in Elmore, Oak Harbor, and Wellington; new opportunities for assistance and incentives for residential energy efficiency in the Oberlin community; new opportunities for financial and energy savings through vehicle collaboration within Lorain County; and decreased reliance on fossil fuels and expanded production of renewable energy in the region. The dissemination conference and the summary report developed for the conference also benefited the public, but making the findings and recommendations of the regional studies broadly available to elected officials, city managers, educators, representatives of the private sector, and the general public.

Mathison, Jane

2012-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

431

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Arizona (Fact Sheet)  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Arizona. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Arizona to be $1.15 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.0 million tons, and annual water savings are 818 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Indiana (Fact Sheet)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ind power is one of the fastest-growing forms of ind power is one of the fastest-growing forms of new power generation in the United States. Industry growth in 2007 was an astounding 45%. New wind power installations constituted 35% of all new electric power installations. This growth is the result of many drivers, includ- ing increased economic competitiveness and favorable state policies such as Renewable Portfolio Standards. However, new wind power installations provide more than cost-competitive electricity. Wind power brings economic development to rural regions, reduces greenhouse gas production by displacing fossil fuels, and reduces water consumption in the electric power sector. The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers

433

Marine pastures: a by-product of large (100 megawatt or larger) floating ocean thermal power plants. Progress report, February 1, 1976--April 30, 1976  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Computer programs have been developed to define the temperature increase which would be needed to bring deep-ocean water into density equilibrium with surface water for locations where data are available. A series of continuous-flow studies on phytoplankton blooms resulting from mixtures of 80 percent deep and 20 percent surface water in 2000-liter concrete culturing vessels (''reactors'') has been completed. A quantitative determination of nutrient utilization and flow through a combined primary and secondary trophic level system has been completed. This study utilized the clam Tapes semidecussata, fed from phytoplankton grown in 80 percent deep and 20 percent surface water. An analysis of the fate of the deep water discharged from a floating OTEC plant indicates that horizontal containment of the resulting deep water: surface water mixture is necessary if conditions optimal for open-sea mariculture are to obtain. The design of a small open-ocean ''pool'' is in the final stages of completion. A combined mussel/oyster/clam system is in the final stages of design and will be placed in the ocean during April 1976. (WDM)

Roels, O.A.

1976-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Kansas (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Kansas. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Kansas to be $1.08 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 3.2 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,816 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Michigan  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Michigan. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Michigan to be $1.3 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.9 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,542 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Virginia (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Virginia. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Virginia to be $1.2 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 3.0 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,600 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Nevada (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Nevada. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Nevada to be $1.1 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.3 million tons, and annual water savings are 944 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Tennessee (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Tennessee. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, seven states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Tennessee to be $1.2 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.4 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,321 million gallons.

Lantz, E.; Tegen, S.

2009-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Nebraska (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Nebraska. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Nebraska to be $1.1 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 4.1 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,840 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Indiana  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Indiana. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Indiana to be $1.3 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.8 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,684 million gallons.

Lantz, E.; Tegen, S.

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Arkansas (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Arkansas. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Arkansas to be $1.15 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.7 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,507 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

442

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Wisconsin (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Wisconsin. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Wisconsin to be $1.1 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 3.2 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,476 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in North Carolina (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in North Carolina. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, seven states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in North Carolina to be $1.1 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.9 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,558 million gallons.

Not Available

2009-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Ohio (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Ohio. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Ohio to be $1.3 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.5 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,343 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Utah (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Utah. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Utah to be $1.1 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.0 million tons, and annual water savings are 828 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

446

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in West Virginia (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in West Virginia. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in West Virginia to be $1.0 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 3.3 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,763 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reduction, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Georgia (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Georgia. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Georgia to be $2.1 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 3.0 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,628 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Massachusetts (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Massachusetts. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, seven states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Massachusetts to be $1.4 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.6 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,293 million gallons.

Lantz, E.; Tegen, S.

2009-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Idaho (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Idaho. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Idaho to be $1.1 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.2 million tons, and annual water savings are 906 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in South Dakota (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in South Dakota. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in South Dakota to be $1.1 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 4.0 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,795 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Maryland (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Michigan. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Maryland to be $1.2 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 3 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,581 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

452

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Pennsylvania (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Pennsylvania. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Pennsylvania to be $1.2 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 3.4 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,837 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Montana (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Montana. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Montana to be $1.2 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.9 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,207 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in New Mexico (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in New Mexico. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in New Mexico to be $1.1 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.6 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,117 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

455

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in New York (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policy makers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in New York. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in New York to be $1.3 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.5 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,230 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

Economic Benefits, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Reductions, and Water Conservation Benefits from 1,000 Megawatts (MW) of New Wind Power in Maine (Fact Sheet)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy?s Wind Powering America Program is committed to educating state-level policymakers and other stakeholders about the economic, CO2 emissions, and water conservation impacts of wind power. This analysis highlights the expected impacts of 1000 MW of wind power in Maine. Although construction and operation of 1000 MW of wind power is a significant effort, six states have already reached the 1000-MW mark. We forecast the cumulative economic benefits from 1000 MW of development in Maine to be $1.3 billion, annual CO2 reductions are estimated at 2.8 million tons, and annual water savings are 1,387 million gallons.

Not Available

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

457

Marine pastures: a by-product of large (100 megawatt or larger) floating ocean thermal power plants. Progress report, February 1, 1976--April 30, 1976  

SciTech Connect

Computer programs have been developed to define the temperature increase which would be needed to bring deep-ocean water into density equilibrium with surface water for locations where data are available. A series of continuous-flow studies on phytoplankton blooms resulting from mixtures of 80 percent deep and 20 percent surface water in 2000-liter concrete culturing vessels (''reactors'') has been completed. A quantitative determination of nutrient utilization and flow through a combined primary and secondary trophic level system has been completed. This study utilized the clam Tapes semidecussata, fed from phytoplankton grown in 80 percent deep and 20 percent surface water. An analysis of the fate of the deep water discharged from a floating OTEC plant indicates that horizontal containment of the resulting deep water: surface water mixture is necessary if conditions optimal for open-sea mariculture are to obtain. The design of a small open-ocean ''pool'' is in the final stages of completion. A combined mussel/oyster/clam system is in the final stages of design and will be placed in the ocean during April 1976. (WDM)

Roels, O.A.

1976-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

458

Easing the natural gas crisis: Reducing natural gas prices through increased deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

MWh of incremental renewable energy production provides, onincremental renewable energy production exceeds 10 billion

Wiser, Ryan; Bolinger, Mark; St. Clair, Matt

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

459

Data:D62a4173-2f47-4b52-833c-3ca8d76b3030 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

73-2f47-4b52-833c-3ca8d76b3030 73-2f47-4b52-833c-3ca8d76b3030 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Detroit Edison Co Effective date: 2011/12/21 End date if known: Rate name: INTERRUPTIBLE SUPPLY RATE D8 TRANSMISSION (120 kV and ABOVE)-Full Service Sector: Commercial Description: Voltage discount $0.0015 included. Available to customers desiring separately metered service at primary voltage who contract for a specified quantity of demonstrated interruptible load of not less than 50 kilowatts at a single location. Contracted interruptible capacity on this rate is limited to 150 megawatts. HOURS OF INTERRUPTION: All electric power delivered hereunder shall be subject to curtailment on order of the Company. Customers may be ordered to interrupt only when the Company finds it necessary to do so either to maintain system integrity or when the existence of such loads shall lead to a capacity deficiency by the utility. A System Integrity Interruption Order may be given by the Company when the failure to interrupt will contribute to the implementation of the rules for emergency electrical procedures under Section C3. A Capacity Deficiency Interruption Order may be given by the Company when available system generation is insufficient to meet anticipated system load. NOTICE OF INTERRUPTION: The customer shall be provided, whenever possible, notice in advance of probable interruption and the estimated duration of the interruption. NON-INTERRUPTION FEE: Customers who do not interrupt within one hour following notice of a capacity deficiency interruption order shall be billed at the cost of replacement energy plus 0.576¢ per kWh during the time of interruption plus the applicable voltage level charge, but not less than the normal D8 rate. Voltage level charges for service other than transmission voltage are: 0.15¢ per kWh at the distribution level. 0.05¢ per kWh at the subtransmission level. NON-INTERRUPTION PENALTY: A customer who does not interrupt within one hour following a system integrity interruption order shall be billed at the rate of $10 per kW for the highest 30-minute kW demand created during the interruption period for all usage above the customer's firm demand, in addition to the prescribed monthly rate. In addition, the interruptible contract capacity of a customer who does not interrupt within one hour following notice shall be immediately reduced by the amount by which the customer failed to interrupt, unless the customer demonstrates that failure to interrupt was beyond its control. Substation Credit: Available to customers where service at sub-transmission voltage level (24 to 41.6 kV) or higher is required, who provide the on-site substation including all necessary transforming, controlling and protective equipment. A credit of $.30 per kW of maximum demand shall be applied to the maximum demand charge. A credit of .040¢ per kWh shall be applied to the energy charge where the service is metered on the primary side of the transformer.

460

Data:B96e93c6-25be-455c-af39-df480a1fa45c | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

e93c6-25be-455c-af39-df480a1fa45c e93c6-25be-455c-af39-df480a1fa45c No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Detroit Edison Co Effective date: 2011/12/21 End date if known: Rate name: INTERRUPTIBLE SUPPLY RATE D8 Primary Service (Less than 24 kV)-Full Service Sector: Commercial Description: Available to customers desiring separately metered service at primary voltage who contract for a specified quantity of demonstrated interruptible load of not less than 50 kilowatts at a single location. Contracted interruptible capacity on this rate is limited to 150 megawatts. HOURS OF INTERRUPTION: All electric power delivered hereunder shall be subject to curtailment on order of the Company. Customers may be ordered to interrupt only when the Company finds it necessary to do so either to maintain system integrity or when the existence of such loads shall lead to a capacity deficiency by the utility. A System Integrity Interruption Order may be given by the Company when the failure to interrupt will contribute to the implementation of the rules for emergency electrical procedures under Section C3. A Capacity Deficiency Interruption Order may be given by the Company when available system generation is insufficient to meet anticipated system load. NOTICE OF INTERRUPTION: The customer shall be provided, whenever possible, notice in advance of probable interruption and the estimated duration of the interruption. NON-INTERRUPTION FEE: Customers who do not interrupt within one hour following notice of a capacity deficiency interruption order shall be billed at the cost of replacement energy plus 0.576¢ per kWh during the time of interruption plus the applicable voltage level charge, but not less than the normal D8 rate. Voltage level charges for service other than transmission voltage are: 0.15¢ per kWh at the distribution level. 0.05¢ per kWh at the subtransmission level. NON-INTERRUPTION PENALTY: A customer who does not interrupt within one hour following a system integrity interruption order shall be billed at the rate of $10 per kW for the highest 30-minute kW demand created during the interruption period for all usage above the customer's firm demand, in addition to the prescribed monthly rate. In addition, the interruptible contract capacity of a customer who does not interrupt within one hour following notice shall be immediately reduced by the amount by which the customer failed to interrupt, unless the customer demonstrates that failure to interrupt was beyond its control. Substation Credit: Available to customers where service at sub-transmission voltage level (24 to 41.6 kV) or higher is required, who provide the on-site substation including all necessary transforming, controlling and protective equipment. A credit of $.30 per kW of maximum demand shall be applied to the maximum demand charge. A credit of .040¢ per kWh shall be applied to the energy charge where the service is metered on the primary side of the transformer.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "megawatt mwh megawatt-hour" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Data:095a28cc-3ba7-488f-8e0d-80d411cc579e | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

cc-3ba7-488f-8e0d-80d411cc579e cc-3ba7-488f-8e0d-80d411cc579e No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Detroit Edison Co Effective date: 2011/10/29 End date if known: Rate name: INTERRUPTIBLE SUPPLY RATE D8 TRANSMISSION (120 kV and ABOVE)-Retail Service Sector: Commercial Description: Available to customers desiring separately metered service at primary voltage who contract for a specified quantity of demonstrated interruptible load of not less than 50 kilowatts at a single location. Contracted interruptible capacity on this rate is limited to 150 megawatts. HOURS OF INTERRUPTION: All electric power delivered hereunder shall be subject to curtailment on order of the Company. Customers may be ordered to interrupt only when the Company finds it necessary to do so either to maintain system integrity or when the existence of such loads shall lead to a capacity deficiency by the utility. A System Integrity Interruption Order may be given by the Company when the failure to interrupt will contribute to the implementation of the rules for emergency electrical procedures under Section C3. A Capacity Deficiency Interruption Order may be given by the Company when available system generation is insufficient to meet anticipated system load. NOTICE OF INTERRUPTION: The customer shall be provided, whenever possible, notice in advance of probable interruption and the estimated duration of the interruption. NON-INTERRUPTION FEE: Customers who do not interrupt within one hour following notice of a capacity deficiency interruption order shall be billed at the cost of replacement energy plus 0.576¢ per kWh during the time of interruption plus the applicable voltage level charge, but not less than the normal D8 rate. Voltage level charges for service other than transmission voltage are: 0.15¢ per kWh at the distribution level. 0.05¢ per kWh at the subtransmission level. NON-INTERRUPTION PENALTY: A customer who does not interrupt within one hour following a system integrity interruption order shall be billed at the rate of $10 per kW for the highest 30-minute kW demand created during the interruption period for all usage above the customer's firm demand, in addition to the prescribed monthly rate. In addition, the interruptible contract capacity of a customer who does not interrupt within one hour following notice shall be immediately reduced by the amount by which the customer failed to interrupt, unless the customer demonstrates that failure to interrupt was beyond its control. Substation Credit: Available to customers where service at sub-transmission voltage level (24 to 41.6 kV) or higher is required, who provide the on-site substation including all necessary transforming, controlling and protective equipment. A credit of $.30 per kW of maximum demand shall be applied to the maximum demand charge. A credit of .040¢ per kWh shall be applied to the energy charge where the service is metered on the primary side of the transformer.

462

Data:1465ff78-1e87-4f9f-837e-c8cca1bd50f8 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

ff78-1e87-4f9f-837e-c8cca1bd50f8 ff78-1e87-4f9f-837e-c8cca1bd50f8 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Detroit Edison Co Effective date: 2011/12/21 End date if known: Rate name: INTERRUPTIBLE SUPPLY RATE D8 Subtransmission (24 to 41.6 kV)-Retail Service Sector: Commercial Description: Available to customers desiring separately metered service at primary voltage who contract for a specified quantity of demonstrated interruptible load of not less than 50 kilowatts at a single location. Contracted interruptible capacity on this rate is limited to 150 megawatts. HOURS OF INTERRUPTION: All electric power delivered hereunder shall be subject to curtailment on order of the Company. Customers may be ordered to interrupt only when the Company finds it necessary to do so either to maintain system integrity or when the existence of such loads shall lead to a capacity deficiency by the utility. A System Integrity Interruption Order may be given by the Company when the failure to interrupt will contribute to the implementation of the rules for emergency electrical procedures under Section C3. A Capacity Deficiency Interruption Order may be given by the Company when available system generation is insufficient to meet anticipated system load. NOTICE OF INTERRUPTION: The customer shall be provided, whenever possible, notice in advance of probable interruption and the estimated duration of the interruption. NON-INTERRUPTION FEE: Customers who do not interrupt within one hour following notice of a capacity deficiency interruption order shall be billed at the cost of replacement energy plus 0.576¢ per kWh during the time of interruption plus the applicable voltage level charge, but not less than the normal D8 rate. Voltage level charges for service other than transmission voltage are: 0.15¢ per kWh at the distribution level. 0.05¢ per kWh at the subtransmission level. NON-INTERRUPTION PENALTY: A customer who does not interrupt within one hour following a system integrity interruption order shall be billed at the rate of $10 per kW for the highest 30-minute kW demand created during the interruption period for all usage above the customer's firm demand, in addition to the prescribed monthly rate. In addition, the interruptible contract capacity of a customer who does not interrupt within one hour following notice shall be immediately reduced by the amount by which the customer failed to interrupt, unless the customer demonstrates that failure to interrupt was beyond its control. Substation Credit: Available to customers where service at sub-transmission voltage level (24 to 41.6 kV) or higher is required, who provide the on-site substation including all necessary transforming, controlling and protective equipment. A credit of $.30 per kW of maximum demand shall be applied to the maximum demand charge. A credit of .040¢ per kWh shall be applied to the energy charge where the service is metered on the primary side of the transformer.

463

Data:3109034f-5607-41a5-8c8f-ed0cbddf52ed | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4f-5607-41a5-8c8f-ed0cbddf52ed 4f-5607-41a5-8c8f-ed0cbddf52ed No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Detroit Edison Co Effective date: 2011/10/29 End date if known: Rate name: INTERRUPTIBLE SUPPLY RATE D8 Primary Service (Less than 24 kV)-Retail Service Sector: Commercial Description: Available to customers desiring separately metered service at primary voltage who contract for a specified quantity of demonstrated interruptible load of not less than 50 kilowatts at a single location. Contracted interruptible capacity on this rate is limited to 150 megawatts. HOURS OF INTERRUPTION: All electric power delivered hereunder shall be subject to curtailment on order of the Company. Customers may be ordered to interrupt only when the Company finds it necessary to do so either to maintain system integrity or when the existence of such loads shall lead to a capacity deficiency by the utility. A System Integrity Interruption Order may be given by the Company when the failure to interrupt will contribute to the implementation of the rules for emergency electrical procedures under Section C3. A Capacity Deficiency Interruption Order may be given by the Company when available system generation is insufficient to meet anticipated system load. NOTICE OF INTERRUPTION: The customer shall be provided, whenever possible, notice in advance of probable interruption and the estimated duration of the interruption. NON-INTERRUPTION FEE: Customers who do not interrupt within one hour following notice of a capacity deficiency interruption order shall be billed at the cost of replacement energy plus 0.576¢ per kWh during the time of interruption plus the applicable voltage level charge, but not less than the normal D8 rate. Voltage level charges for service other than transmission voltage are: 0.15¢ per kWh at the distribution level. 0.05¢ per kWh at the subtransmission level. NON-INTERRUPTION PENALTY: A customer who does not interrupt within one hour following a system integrity interruption order shall be billed at the rate of $10 per kW for the highest 30-minute kW demand created during the interruption period for all usage above the customer's firm demand, in addition to the prescribed monthly rate. In addition, the interruptible contract capacity of a customer who does not interrupt within one hour following notice shall be immediately reduced by the amount by which the customer failed to interrupt, unless the customer demonstrates that failure to interrupt was beyond its control. Substation Credit: Available to customers where service at sub-transmission voltage level (24 to 41.6 kV) or higher is required, who provide the on-site substation including all necessary transforming, controlling and protective equipment. A credit of $.30 per kW of maximum demand shall be applied to the maximum demand charge. A credit of .040¢ per kWh shall be applied to the energy charge where the service is metered on the primary side of the transformer.

464

Essays in Applied Microeconomics  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

average emis- sions of carbon dioxide per megawatt of U.S.oxides, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrousproduces roughly the carbon dioxide emissions per megawatt

Severnini, Edson Roberto

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Department of Energy Announces Two Year Pay Freeze on Site and...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management Awards Members of the Paducah Citizens Advisory Board helped create the book, The Story of the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Megawatts to Megatons to Megawatts....

466

Kentucky | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Kentucky July 31, 2013 Members of the Paducah Citizens Advisory Board helped create the book, The Story of the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Megawatts to Megatons to Megawatts....