Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

MANHATTAN PROJECT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department, as the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, owns andmanages the Federal properties at most of the major Manhattan Project sites, including Oak Ridge, Tennessee;...

2

President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Establishes Manhattan Project | National Nuclear Establishes Manhattan Project | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project June 17, 1942 Washington, DC President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project

3

President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project | National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to the main content Facebook Flickr RSS Twitter YouTube President Roosevelt Establishes Manhattan Project | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the...

4

The Manhattan Project National Security History Series  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Manhattan Project National Security History Series 5 Visit our Manhattan Project web site: http://www.cfo.doe.gov/me70/manhattan/index.htm 5 DOE/MA-0002 Revised F. G. Gosling Office of History and Heritage Resources Executive Secretariat Office of Management Department of Energy January 2010 The Manhattan Project National Security History Series 5 National Security History Series Volume I: The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb Volume II: Building the Nuclear Arsenal: Cold War Nuclear Weapons Development and Production, 1946-1989 (in progress) Volume III: Nonproliferation and Stockpile Stewardship: The Nuclear Weapons Complex in the Post-Cold War World (projected) The National Security History Series is a joint project of the Office

5

Manhattan Project National Historical Park | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Manhattan Project National Historical Park Manhattan Project National Historical Park Manhattan Project National Historical Park The Department, as the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, owns and manages the Federal properties at most of the major Manhattan Project sites, including Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hanford, Washington; and Los Alamos, New Mexico. For over a decade, the Department, in cooperation with other Federal agencies, state and local governments, and other stakeholders, has pursued the possibility of including its most significant Manhattan Project properties within a Manhattan Project National Historical Park. A panel of distinguished historic preservation experts convened in 2001 by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at the request of the Department of Energy recommended that the "ultimate goal" for

6

MANHATTAN PROJECT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy traces its origins to World War II and the Manhattan Project effort to build the first atomic bomb. As the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, the...

7

Manhattan Project Resources | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Manhattan Project Resources Manhattan Project Resources Manhattan Project Resources Building 9731 was the first building completed at Y-12 and was the "Pilot Plant" for the Calutron electromagnetic separation of uranium. The Manhattan Project web pages are designed to disseminate information and documentation on the Manhattan Project to a broad audience including scholars, students, and the general public. These web pages are a joint collaboration between DOE's Office of Classification and Office of History and Heritage Resources. The Y-12 History Center is proud to recommend them highly as they contain very helpful information. The site brings together an enormous amount of material, much of it never before released. An example of the key resource information provided is the update and

8

Manhattan Project: Library  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

LIBRARY LIBRARY Resources A number of government publications relating to the Manhattan Project are available either as web pages or as .pdf documents. Cover of the Manhattan Project publication Department of Energy Publications Fehner and Gosling, Origins of the Nevada Test Site Fehner and Gosling, Battlefield of the Cold War: The Nevada Test Site Gosling, Manhattan Project, 1999 Gosling, Manhattan Project, 2010 Harnessed Atom United States Nuclear Tests, 1945-1992 Wahlen, History of 100-B Area Los Alamos National Laboratory Publications Bainbridge, Trinity Fakley, "The British Mission" Hawkins, MDH: Project Y, Vol. 1 Los Alamos: Beginning of an Era, 1943-1945 Malik, Yields of Hiroshima and Nagasaki "Oppenheimer Years" Serber, Los Alamos Primer Truslow, MDH: Project Y, Vol. 2

9

The Manhattan Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Project Sites and Their Contributions · Key Events · Scientists · Its Story · Additional Information · Related Information President Roosevelt Establishes the Manhattan Project President Roosevelt instructs the Army to take responsibility for construction of atomic weapons complex. The Army delegates the task to the Corps of Engineers, which establishes the Manhattan Engineer District. Courtesy of National Nuclear Security Administration The 70th anniversary of the establishment of the Manhattan Project on August 13, 1942, is celebrated this year. The Manhattan Project played an essential role in bringing World War II to an end through the building of the atomic bomb. This major achievement was possible because the U.S. government conducted a massive, secret, nationwide enterprise that took science from the laboratory and into combat with an entirely new type of weapon.

10

MANHATTAN PROJECT | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MANHATTAN PROJECT MANHATTAN PROJECT MANHATTAN PROJECT MANHATTAN PROJECT The Department of Energy traces its origins to World War II and the Manhattan Project effort to build the first atomic bomb. As the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, the organization set up by the Army Corps of Engineers to develop and build the bomb, the Department continues to own and manage the Federal properties at most of the major Manhattan Project sites, including Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hanford, Washington; and Los Alamos, New Mexico. In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, both journalists and the public ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the end of the Second World War as the top news stories of the twentieth-century. The Manhattan Project is the story of some of the most renowned scientists of the century

11

Manhattan Project: People Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

PEOPLE IMAGES PEOPLE IMAGES Resources > Photo Gallery Scroll down to see each of these images individually. The images are: 1. J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Ernest Lawrence (courtesy the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory); 2. Hanford, Washington, workers sending money home (reproduced from the photo insert in F. G. Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb (Washington: History Division, Department of Energy, October 2001)); 3. Oppenheimer and Leslie Groves at the Trinity Site, September 1945 (reproduced from the cover of the Office of History and Heritage Resources publication: The Signature Facilities of the Manhattan Project (Washington: History Division, Department of Energy, 2001)); 4. A WAC detachment marching at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, June 1945 (courtesy the Army Corps of Engineers; it is reprinted in Rachel Fermi and Esther Samra, Picturing the Bomb: Photographs from the Secret World of the Manhattan Project (New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Publishers, 1995), 40);

12

Manhattan Project: Fuller Lodge  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

FULLER LODGE FULLER LODGE Los Alamos Boys Ranch School and Los Alamos (The Town) Resources > Photo Gallery Fuller Lodge Fuller Lodge was one of the main structures of the Los Alamos Boys Ranch School, serving as its headquarters in its later years. It was converted into a mess hall and guest quarters during the Manhattan Project. In the photograph above, part of the guest house is visible in the distance to the right. The photograph above is courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory. It is also reproduced in Edith C. Truslow, with Kasha V. Thayer, ed., Manhattan Engineer District: Nonscientific Aspects of Los Alamos Project Y, 1942 through 1946 (Los Alamos, NM: Manhattan Engineer District, ca. 1946; first printed by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory as LA-5200, March 1973; reprinted in 1997 by the Los Alamos Historical Society), 57. The additional photographs below are:

13

Manhattan Project: Maps  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

MAPS MAPS Resources Scroll down to view thumbnails of each map. Leslie Groves looks at a map of Japan. Manhattan Project: General Manhattan Project Facilities Places map "Signature Facilities of the MED" map Hanford Hanford map Hanford (black and white) map Hanford Site Diagram Hanford Site Location Map Hanford: Native Peoples map Hanford: Town map Los Alamos Map of Los Alamos, New Mexico Los Alamos: "Tech Area" map Oak Ridge Map of Clinton Engineer Works, Oak Ridge Clinton Engineer Works, Oak Ridge (black and white) map Oak Ridge: Projected Site for Atomic Production Plants, 1942, map Other Flight paths for Hiroshima and Nagasaki missions map Map of the Trinity Test Site Post-War U.S. Nuclear Tests map Manhattan Project Facilities Manhattan Project Facilities

14

The Manhattan Project | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Manhattan Project The Manhattan Project A brief History of the Manhattan Project: Terrence R. Fehner and F.G. Gosling, The Manhattan Project, 2012, 10 p. The Manhattan...

15

Manhattan Project Historical Resources  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energyhas developed and made available to the public--in print, online, and on display--a variety of Manhattan Project historical resources. These include histories, websites,...

16

MANHATTAN PROJECT HISTORICAL RESOURCES  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energyhas developed and made available to the public--in print, online, and on display--a variety of Manhattan Project historical resources. These include histories, websites,...

17

The Manhattan Project | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Field Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home The Manhattan Project The Manhattan Project A brief History of the Manhattan Project: Terrence...

18

Manhattan Project: Places  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Places Places "Met Lab" (Metallurgical Laboratory) Oak Ridge: Clinton Engineer Works Hanford Engineer Works Los Alamos Other Places Places of the Manhattan Project Places PLEASE NOTE: The Places pages are not yet available. Links to the pages listed below and to the left will be activated as content is developed. Select topics relating to the places where the Manhattan Project occurred have been grouped into the categories listed to the left. A quick overview of places involved in the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summary pages for each of the categories, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of all the subtopics included within that category. For a complete menu of all place pages, see the comprehensive list of topics below.

19

Manhattan Project: Suggested Readings  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SUGGESTED READINGS SUGGESTED READINGS Resources > Readings The literature on the Manhattan Project is extensive. The purpose of this web page is not to catalogue it, but only to suggest a very select few places to start. For more exhaustive lists of secondary works relating to the early history of nuclear energy, consult the bibliographies of the books listed below. Suggested Surveys of the Manhattan Project Gosling, F. G. The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb. DOE/MA-0001; Washington: History Division, Department of Energy, January 1999. An overview history by the Chief Historian of the Department of Energy and the basis for most of the "Events" in this web site. The best short survey for the general reader. Revised with additional photographs in January 2010 as DOE/MA-0002 Revised and available in .pdf format.

20

Manhattan Project: Science  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Science Science In the Laboratory Particle Accelerators and Other Technologies The Atom and Atomic Structure Nuclear Physics Bomb Design and Components Radioactivity Science and technology of the Manhattan Project Science PLEASE NOTE: The Science pages are not yet available. Links to the pages listed below and to the left will be activated as content is developed. Select topics relating to the science and technology of the Manhattan Project have been grouped into the categories listed to the left. A quick overview of scientific topics useful for understanding the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summary pages for each of the categories, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of all the subtopics included within that category. For a complete menu of all science pages, see the comprehensive list of topics below.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Manhattan Project: People  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

People People Administrators Scientists Civilian Organizations Military Organizations Non-Technical Personnel J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Ernest Lawrence People PLEASE NOTE: The People pages are not yet available. Links to the pages listed below and to the left will be activated as content is developed. Select people and organizations of the Manhattan Project have been grouped into the categories listed to the left. A quick overview of the groups of people contributing to the success of the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summary pages for each of the categories, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of all the people included in that category. For a complete menu of all people pages, see the comprehensive list of people below.

22

Manhattan Project: Processes  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Processes Processes Uranium Mining, Milling, and Refining Uranium Isotope Separation Plutonium Production Bomb Design, Development, and Production Bomb Testing and Weapon Effects Processes PLEASE NOTE: The Processes pages are not yet available. Links to the pages listed below and to the left will be activated as content is developed. Select topics relating to the industrial processes of the Manhattan Project have been grouped into the categories listed to the left. A quick overview of processes involved in the mission of the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summary pages for each of the categories, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of all the subtopics included within that category. For a complete menu of all process pages, see the comprehensive list of topics below.

23

Manhattan Project: Events  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Time Periods Time Periods 1890s-1939: Atomic Discoveries 1939-1942: Early Government Support 1942: Difficult Choices 1942-1944: The Uranium Path to the Bomb 1942-1944: The Plutonium Path to the Bomb 1942-1945: Bringing It All Together 1945: Dawn of the Atomic Era 1945-present: Postscript -- The Nuclear Age Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard Events The events of the Manhattan Project have been grouped under the time periods listed to the left. A quick overview of the Manhattan Project can be obtained by reading the summaries on each of the eight "Time Periods" pages, located in the left navigation bar. Each summary page also has a listing of the events pages for that particular time period. For a complete menu of all events pages, see the comprehensive list of events below.

24

The Manhattan Project -- Its Story  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project -- Its Story Project -- Its Story Establishment · Operations · Immediate Influences · Long-term Influences · Other Info More About the Manhattan Project atom image Courtesy Argonne National Laboratory The Manhattan Project -- Its Background This year is the 70th anniversary of the establishment of the Manhattan Project, a predecessor of the U.S. Department of Energy. To honor its impacts on science and history, various aspects of its background, establishment, operations, and immediate and long-term influences will be revisited. It started during the fall of 1939, when President F. D. Roosevelt was made aware of the possibility that German scientists were racing to build an atomic bomb and was warned that Hitler would be more than willing to resort to such a weapon. As a result, Roosevelt set up the Advisory Committee on Uranium, consisting of both civilian and military representatives, to study the current state of research on uranium and to recommend an appropriate role for the federal government. The result was limited military funding for isotope separation and the work on chain reactions by Enrico Fermi and Leo Szilard at Columbia University.

25

Walking the City: Manhattan Projects [Research and Debate  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Walking the City: Manhattan Projects Ben Jacks How do wethis survey to projects circumscribed by Manhattans shores.

Jacks, Ben

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

26

Manhattan Project: Site Map  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SITE MAP SITE MAP Resources > Site Map THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Events 1890s-1939: Atomic Discoveries A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 1939-1942: Early Government Support Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 1942: Difficult Choices More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 1942-1944: The Uranium Path to the Bomb Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943

27

Manhattan Project: Tech Area Gallery  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

TECH AREA GALLERY (LARGE) TECH AREA GALLERY (LARGE) Los Alamos: The Laboratory Resources > Photo Gallery All of the photographs below are of the "Tech Area" at Los Alamos during or shortly after the wartime years. If this page is taking a long time to load, click here for a photo gallery with smaller versions of the same images. There is a map of the Tech Area at the top and again at the bottom. The first image below is courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory. All of the other photographs are reproduced from Edith C. Truslow, with Kasha V. Thayer, ed., Manhattan Engineer District: Nonscientific Aspects of Los Alamos Project Y, 1942 through 1946 (Los Alamos, NM: Manhattan Engineer District, ca. 1946; first printed by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory as LA-5200, March 1973; reprinted in 1997 by the Los Alamos Historical Society). This is a reprint of an unpublished volume originally written in 1946 by 2nd Lieutenant Edith C. Truslow, a member of the Women's Army Corps, as a contribution to the Manhattan Engineer District History.

28

Manhattan Project: Tech Area Gallery  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SMALL) SMALL) Los Alamos: The Laboratory Resources > Photo Gallery All of the photographs below are of the "Tech Area" at Los Alamos during or shortly after the wartime years. If you have a fast internet connection, you may wish to click here for a photo gallery with larger versions of the same images. There is a map of the Tech Area at the top and again at the bottom. The first image below is courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory. All of the other photographs are reproduced from Edith C. Truslow, with Kasha V. Thayer, ed., Manhattan Engineer District: Nonscientific Aspects of Los Alamos Project Y, 1942 through 1946 (Los Alamos, NM: Manhattan Engineer District, ca. 1946; first printed by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory as LA-5200, March 1973; reprinted in 1997 by the Los Alamos Historical Society). This is a reprint of an unpublished volume originally written in 1946 by 2nd Lieutenant Edith C. Truslow, a member of the Women's Army Corps, as a contribution to the Manhattan Engineer District History.

29

Manhattan Project: Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Klaus Fuchs's Los Alamos security badge photo ESPIONAGE AND THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Klaus Fuchs's Los Alamos security badge photo ESPIONAGE AND THE MANHATTAN PROJECT (1940-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 Security was a way of life for the Manhattan Project. The goal was to keep the entire atomic bomb program secret from Germany and Japan. In this, Manhattan Project security officials succeeded. They also sought, however, to keep word of the atomic bomb from reaching the Soviet Union. Although an ally of Britain and the United States in the war against Germany, the Soviet Union remained a repressive dictatorship and a potential future enemy. Here, security officials were less successful. Soviet spies penetrated the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos and several other locations, sending back to Russia critical information that helped speed the development of the Soviet bomb.

30

Manhattan Project: Joe 1  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Joe 1, the first Soviet atomic test, August 29, 1949. Events > Postscript--The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 > Espionage and the Manhattan...

31

Manhattan Project: The Manhattan Project and the Second World War,  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Oak Ridgers celebrate V-J Day THE MANHATTAN PROJECT AND THE SECOND WORLD WAR Oak Ridgers celebrate V-J Day THE MANHATTAN PROJECT AND THE SECOND WORLD WAR (1939-1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the surrender of Japan were the last acts of the Second World War. The most destructive weapon in the history of combat had helped bring an end to the most destructive conflict in human history.

32

Manhattan Project Signature Facilities | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Manhattan Manhattan Project Signature Facilities Manhattan Project Signature Facilities Manhattan Project Signature Facilities The Department of Energy, in the mid-1990s, developed a list of eight Manhattan Project properties that were designated as "Signature Facilities." These properties, taken together, provided the essential core for successfully interpreting for the American public the Manhattan Project mission of developing an atomic bomb. The Department's goal was to move foward in preserving and interpreting these properties by integrating departmental headquarters and field activities and joining in a working partnership with all interested outside entities, organizations, and individuals, including Congress, state and local governments, the Department's contractors, and various other stakeholders.

33

Manhattan Project: Image Retouching`  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Image Retouching Image Retouching Resources > Photo Gallery Smyth Report (original) Smyth Report (retouched) Images on this web site have sometimes been "retouched." In every case, however, the intention has been only to restore the image as much as possible to its original condition. Above is a rather extreme example-"before and after" versions of the cover of the Smyth Report (Henry DeWolf Smyth, Atomic Energy for Military Purposes: The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb under the Auspices of the United States Government, 1940-1945 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945)). The Smyth Report was commissioned by Leslie Groves and originally issued by the Manhattan Engineer District. Princeton University Press reprinted it in book form as a "public service" with "reproduction in whole or in part authorized and permitted.") Larger versions of the same images are below.

34

Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb F.G. Gosling. The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb. DOE/MA-0002 Revised. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, 2010. 115 pp., with 38 pp. photo gallery). From the Forward to the 2010 Edition: "In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, journalists and historians ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the surrender of Japan to end the Second World War as the top story of the twentieth century. The advent of nuclear weapons, brought about by the Manhattan Project, not only helped bring an end to World War II but ushered in the atomic age and determined how the next war-the Cold War-would be fought. The Manhattan Project also became the organizational model behind

35

Manhattan Project: Potsdam Note  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

POTSDAM NOTE POTSDAM NOTE Potsdam, Germany (July 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery Note written by President Harry S. Truman, in which he brags that Stalin did not understand when Truman hinted at Potsdam of a powerful new American weapon. (Scroll down to see the note.) Due to the success of Soviet espionage, however, Truman was incorrect-in fact, Stalin knew about the atomic bomb project three years before Truman did. Truman wrote this note on the back of a photograph of the Potsdam Conference taken on July 19, 1945. In the photograph Stalin talks with Truman and Secretary of State James Byrnes (both have their backs to the camera). The photograph of Potsdam is courtesy the Office of the Chief Signal Officer, War Department, U.S. Army; this image, and the photograph of Truman's writing on the back of it, are courtesy the National Archives.

36

Impacts of the Cerro Grande fire on Homestead era and Manhattan Project properties at Los Alamos National Laboratory.  

SciTech Connect

In May of 2000, the Cerro Grande Fire burned approximately 8,000 acres of Department of Energy (DOE) managed land at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Although the fire was generally of low intensity, it impacted a significant number of LANL's cultural resources. Historic wooden properties were affected more heavily than prehistoric archaeological sites. This paper will provide an overview of the Homestead and Manhattan Project Periods at LANL and will discuss the effects of the Cerro Grande Fire on historic wooden properties. Post-fire cultural resource management issues will also be discussed.

McGehee, E. D. (Ellen D.); Isaacson, J. (John)

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Impacts of the Cerro Grande fire on Homestead era and Manhattan Project properties at Los Alamos National Laboratory.  

SciTech Connect

In May of 2000, the Cerro Grande Fire burned approximately 8,000 acres of Department of Energy (DOE) managed land at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Although the fire was generally of low intensity, it impacted a significant number of LANL's cultural resources. Historic wooden properties were affected more heavily than prehistoric archaeological sites. This paper will provide an overview of the Homestead and Manhattan Project Periods at LANL and will discuss the effects of the Cerro Grande Fire on historic wooden properties. Post-fire cultural resource management issues will also be discussed.

McGehee, E. D. (Ellen D.); Isaacson, J. (John)

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

Manhattan Project: Places Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

PLACES IMAGES PLACES IMAGES Resources > Photo Gallery Scroll down to see each of these images individually. The images are: 1. Remains of a Shinto Shrine, Nagasaki, October 1945 (courtesy the United States Marine Corps, Lieutenant R. J. Battersby, photographer, via the National Archives); 2. University of California, Berkeley, 1940 (courtesy the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory); 3. Aerial photograph of the Trinity Site after the test (courtesy the Federation of American Scientists); 4. Aerial photograph of Hiroshima before the bombing; 5. Columbia University, 1903 (courtesy the Library of Congress; this photograph originated from the Detroit Publishing Company; it was a 1949 gift to the Library of Congress from the State Historical Society of Colorado).

39

Manhattan Project: Science Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SCIENCE IMAGES SCIENCE IMAGES Resources > Photo Gallery Scroll down to see each of these images individually. The images are: 1. Fission (this graphic is adapted from a graphic originally produced by the Washington State Department of Health; the modifications are original to the History Division, now Office of History and Heritage Resources, 2003); 2. Fat Man (plutonium bomb), August 1945 (courtesy the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (via theNational Archives)); 3. F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex Hanford, Washington, 1945; 4. A Cockroft-Walton machine at Los Alamos, New Mexico (courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory; it is reprinted in John F. Hogerton, ed., "Cockroft-Walton Machine," The Atomic Energy Deskbook (New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation, 1963, prepared under the auspices of the Division of Technical Information, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission), 102);

40

Manhattan Project: Nagasaki  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

NAGASAKI IMAGES NAGASAKI IMAGES Nagasaki, Japan (August 9, 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery Aerial photographs of the mushroom cloud forming over Nagasaki, August 9, 1945. The photographs are courtesy the Federation of American Scientists, except for the last one, which is courtesy the Office of War Information (via the National Archives). Scroll down to see each image separately. At the bottom is an additional photograph similar to the fourth photograph, courtesy the Library of Congress. (Click here for a 1.9 MB .tif version of the this image.) First Nagasaki Cloud Photograph Second Nagasaki Cloud Photograph Third Nagasaki Cloud Photograph Fourth Nagasaki Cloud Photograph Mushroom Cloud over Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Mushroom Cloud over Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Click on a link below to return to:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Manhattan Project: Events Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings EVENTS IMAGES Resources > Photo Gallery Page Content Here Scroll down to see each of these images individually. The images are: 1. Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard (courtesy the Federation of American Scientists); 2. Painting of CP-1 going critical (courtesy the National Archives); 3. An Alpha Racetrack inside the Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Clinton Engineer Works, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 4. Eric Jette, Charles Critchfield, and J. Robert Oppenheimer, Los Alamos, New Mexico (this photograph is reprinted from Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos: Beginning of an Era, 1943-1945 (Los Alamos: Public Relations Office, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, ca. 1967-1971), 20);

42

Manhattan Project: Trinity Images  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

IMAGES IMAGES Trinity Test Site (July 16, 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery The first 0.11 seconds of the Nuclear Age These seven photographs of the Trinity test were taken by time-lapse cameras. The last is 109 milliseconds, or 0.109 seconds, after detonation. Scroll down to view each individual image. The photographs are courtesy the Los Alamos National Laboratory, via the Federation of American Scientists web site. The animation is original to the Office of History and Heritage Resources. The dawn of the Nuclear Age (Trinity image #1) The dawn of the Nuclear Age Trinity image #2 Trinity image #3 Trinity image #4 Trinity image #5 Trinity, 0.09 seconds after detonation (Trinity image #6) Trinity, 0.09 seconds after detonation Trinity, 0.11 seconds after detonation (Trinity image #7)

43

Manhattan Project: Berkeley Meeting  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings BERKELEY MEETING University of California, Berkeley (March 29, 1940) Resources > Photo Gallery Lawrence, A. Compton, Bush, Conant, K. Compton, and Loomis A meeting regarding the 184-inch cyclotron project, held at the University of California, Berkeley, on March 29, 1940. Left to right: Ernest O. Lawrence, Arthur H. Compton, Vannevar Bush, James B. Conant, Karl T. Compton, and Alfred L. Loomis. The photograph is reprinted in Richard G. Hewlett and Oscar E. Anderson, Jr., The New World, 1939-1946: Volume I, A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission (Washington: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1972), opposite page 33.

44

Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup A Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) excavation crew working on an American Recovery and Reinvestment Act cleanup project has uncovered the remnants of a 1940s military truck buried in a Manhattan Project landfill. The truck was unearthed inside a sealed building where digging is taking place at Material Disposal Area B (MDA-B), the Lab's first hazardous and radioactive waste landfill. MDA-B was used from 1944 to 1948. Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup More Documents & Publications Los Alamos Lab Completes Excavation of Waste Disposal Site Used in the 1940s Protecting Recovery Act Cleanup Site During Massive Wildfire

45

Manhattan Project: Kasparov, Kamen, and Kheifits  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

KASPAROV, KAMEN, AND KHEIFITS KASPAROV, KAMEN, AND KHEIFITS California? (n.d.) Resources > Photo Gallery Kasparov, Kamen, and Kheifits This surveillance photograph was taken by Manhattan Project security officials. On the right is Gregory Kheifits (KHARON), the NKGB Resident in San Francisco from 1941 to July 1944. On the left is his successor, Gregory Kasparov (DAR). In between them is Martin Kamen, a chemist at the University of California, Berkeley's "Rad Lab." (Kamen was later dismissed as a "security risk.") The photo is courtesy the National Security Agency. For more on Kheifits and Kasparov, see "The Venona Story." See also "The Venona Intercepts, 1946-1980." See also the group photograph of the staff at the Rad Lab in 1939, which includes Kamen, Ernest O. Lawrence, Robert Oppenheimer, and numerous other Manhattan Project scientists. Lawrence is bottom row center; Kamen is over Lawrence's left shoulder; and Oppenheimer is over Kamen's right shoulder.

46

NEPA and NHPA- successful decommissioning of historic Manhattan Project properties at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes experiences at Los Alamos National Laboratory during the process of planning and executing decommissioning and decontamination activities on a number of properties constructed as part of the Manhattan project. Many of these buildings had been abandoned for many years and were in deteriorating condition, in addition to being contaminated with asbestos, lead based paints and high explosive residues. Due to the age and use of the structures they were evaluated against criteria for the National Register of Historic Places. This process is briefly reviewed, along with the results, as well as actions implemented as a result of the condition and safety of the structures. A number of the structures have been decontaminated and demolished. Planning is still ongoing for the renovation of one structure, and the photographic and drawing records of the properties is near completion.

McGehee, E.D.; Pendergrass, A.K.

1997-05-21T23:59:59.000Z

47

Manhattan Project Truck Unearthed in Recovery Act Cleanup  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

www.em.doe.govemrecovery April 20, 2011 Remnants of 1940s military truck buried in a Manhattan Project-era landfill LOS ALAMOS, N.M. - A Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)...

48

Work of Manhattan Project-era photographer Ed Westcott lives...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ridge during the Manhattan Project, can be seen throughout the walls of Y-12 National Security Complex buildings and in other locations in Oak Ridge. His work is also featured...

49

The Manhattan Project: An Interactive History  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, both journalists and the public ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the end of the Second World War as the top news stories of the twentieth-century. The advent of nuclear weapons, made possible by the Manhattan Project, not only helped bring an end to the Second World War-it ushered in the atomic age and determined how the next war, the Cold War, would be fought. The Manhattan Project: An Interactive History is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the Manhattan Project. Five main topical areas-Events, People, Places, Processes, and Science-are further divided into sub-sections, each with an introductory page and as many as a dozen or more sub-pages. The site is interactive in the sense that it is designed with the flexibility to meet the needs of a variety of users. Those seeking a brief overview of the Manhattan Project, for example, should start with the introductory pages for the eight sub-sections of the Events Section. Users wanting a more in-depth chronological history should read, in order, the fifty-six Events sub-pages. Numerous internal links within the content of the pages allows the reader to easily move from page to page, wherever his or her interests lead. There are thus multiple ways for the user to approach the site. In addition, the Resources Section provides access to a variety of resource materials, including photos, documents, maps, and published histories.

50

Manhattan Project: The Venona Intercepts  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Venona intercept regarding Theodore Hall THE VENONA INTERCEPTS (Washington, D.C., 1946-1980) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Soviet intelligence officers in the United States regularly communicated with their superiors in Moscow via telegraphic cables. These messages were encrypted of course, but in 1946 the United States, with the assistance of Great Britain, began to decrypt a good number of these messages. This program led to the eventual capture of several Soviet spies within the Manhattan Project. The VENONA intercepts, as they were codenamed, remained a closely-guarded secret, known only to a handful of government officials, until the program was declassified in 1995. Meredith Gardner (left) and some of his team of cryptanalysts.

51

The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb This report is an account of work on the atomic bomb. The Manhattan Project: Making the...

52

The_Manhattan_Project_2010.pdf | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Field Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home TheManhattanProject2010.pdf TheManhattanProject2010.pdf TheManhattanProject2010.pdf...

53

Manufacturing Fuel Cell Manhattan Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

to to DOE Fuel Cell Manufacturing Workshop 2011 John Christensen, PE NREL Consultant DOE Fuel Cell Market Transformation Support August 11, 2011 Manufacturing Fuel Cell Manhattan Project √ Identify manufacturing cost drivers to achieve affordability √ Identify best practices in fuel cell manufacturing technology √ Identify manufacturing technology gaps √ Identify FC projects to address these gaps MFCMP Objectives Completed Final Report due out Nov 2010 B2PCOE Montana Tech SME's Industry Academia Government FC Consortiums Power ranges * <0.5 kW (man portable / man wearable) * 0.5 kW< Power range < 10 kW (mobile power) Fuels: Hydrogen and reformed hydrocarbons *Packaged Fuels < 0.5 kW * Near term solution * Move through the supply chain like batteries

54

Manhattan Project: The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

(Unofficial) MED emblem, 1946 THE MANHATTAN ENGINEER DISTRICT (Unofficial) MED emblem, 1946 THE MANHATTAN ENGINEER DISTRICT (1945-1946) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present With the end of the Second World War, American policymakers anticipated that the Manhattan Project's infrastructure would be turned over to and managed by a largely civilian commission. General Leslie Groves initially thought this would happen soon after the ending of hostilities. His strategy for interim management of the complex was thus one of "hold the line," where he sought to maintain the essential soundness of the physical plant and the personnel that ran it, complete ongoing construction, and promote efficiency and economy. One of his first decisions was to close down marginal operations such as the S-50 Thermal Diffusion Plant in the K-25 area and the Alpha racetracks of the Y-12 electromagnetic separations plant at Oak Ridge. His most serious short-term problem was in retaining personnel, particularly at Los Alamos where many scientists and technicians were eager to return to civilian pursuits.

55

Manhattan Project truck unearthed at landfill cleanup site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Phonebook Calendar Video Newsroom News Releases News Releases - 2011 April Manhattan project truck Manhattan Project truck unearthed at landfill cleanup site A LANL...

56

The Manhattan Project: Making of the Atomic Bomb | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Field Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home The Manhattan Project: Making of the Atomic Bomb The Manhattan Project: Making of the Atomic...

57

Manhattan Project: Sources and Notes  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SOURCES AND NOTES SOURCES AND NOTES Resources > Sources Below are the collected specific notes for the text and images used on the pages of this web site. For a discussion of the most important works on the Manhattan Project, see the "Suggested Readings." For a general discussion of the use of sources in this web site, see "A Note on Sources." To scan the sources and notes for various categories, choose from the list below. To view the sources and notes for a specific web page, see the footnote at the bottom of each page (exceptions include this page and the home page; the sources and notes for the home page are the first ones listed below). Home Events 1890s-1939: Atomic Discoveries 1939-1942: Early Government Support 1942: Difficult Choices

58

Manhattan Project: Solvay Physics Conference  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SOLVAY PHYSICS CONFERENCE SOLVAY PHYSICS CONFERENCE Brussels, Belgium (October 1933) Resources > Photo Gallery Solvay Physics Conference, Brussels, 1933 The Solvay Physics Conference, held in Brussels, Belgium, October 22-29, 1933. Attendees included two future key Manhattan Project scientists (Fermi and Lawrence), the future head of the Nazi atomic bomb program (Heisenberg), and numerous leading pre-war physicists. A partial list of those attending: Niels Bohr (seated, third from left) James Chadwick (seated, farthest right) J. B. Cockroft (middle row, third from right) Marie Curie (seated, fifth from left) Enrico Fermi (middle row, fifth from left) Werner Heisenberg (middle row, fourth from left) Ernest O. Lawrence (back row, second from right) Lise Meitner (seated, second from right)

59

Manhattan Project: About the Site  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

ABOUT THIS SITE ABOUT THIS SITE Resources Project Directors: Terrence R. Fehner, Chief Historian F. G. Gosling, former Chief Historian (retired) Assisted By: David Rezelman, Glenn T. Seaborg Fellow in Nuclear History Stephanie Young, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies Andrew Mamo, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies Emily Hamilton, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies Douglas O’Reagan, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies James Skee, Edward Teller Fellow in Science and National Security Studies Site Designer: Jennifer Johnson, Archivist Summary Words (estimate): 120,000 Total Pages if Printed (estimate): 430 Total Images: 500+ Photographs: 450+ Maps and Diagrams: 64 Total Images (counting varying sizes, etc.): 1,000+

60

Legacy of a Bomb: The Manhattan Projects Impact on the Scientific Community  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

TECH SPRING WAR TECH The Manhattan Projects Impact on thewar and science: the Manhattan Project. This oper- andfor defense ever, the Manhattan Projects legacy does and

Gao, Jany Huan

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

EDITORIAL ESSAY A "Manhattan Project" for climate change?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

EDITORIAL ESSAY A "Manhattan Project" for climate change? Chi-Jen Yang & Michael Oppenheimer in a timely fashion only through a crash research and development program similar to the Manhattan Project of a "Manhattan Project" on Climate Change would be low-carbon technologies for energy generation and use

Oppenheimer, Michael

62

Work of Manhattan Project-era photographer Ed Westcott lives...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Work of Manhattan ... Work of Manhattan Project-era photographer Ed Westcott lives on Posted: June 13, 2012 - 1:30pm Ed Westcott mans the shutter release for another historic...

63

Manhattan Project: Informing the Public, August 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The Smyth Report, August 1945. INFORMING THE PUBLIC The Smyth Report, August 1945. INFORMING THE PUBLIC (August 1945) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present The atomic bombing of Japan in early August 1945 suddenly thrust the Manhattan Project into the center of the public eye. What formerly had been privy to a select few now became the object of intense public curiosity and scrutiny. Manhattan Project officials, however, had no intent to release what they viewed as essential military secrets. To both allay inordinate inquisitiveness and satisfy the legitimate public need to know, officials in early 1944 began a carefully designed public relations program in anticipation of when they would have to announce the news to the world. They perceived that, from the standpoint of security, the release of some selected information would make it easier to maintain the secrecy of the highly classified aspects of the project. The public relations program had two parts: preparation of a series of public releases and preparation of an administrative and scientific history of the project.

64

Manhattan Project: A Note on Sources  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

A NOTE ON SOURCES A NOTE ON SOURCES Resources > Note on Sources The text for this web site is a combination of original material and adaptations from previous publications of the Department of Energy (including contractors), its predecessor agencies (primarily the Atomic Energy Commission and the Manhattan Engineer District), and other government agencies. Adaptations run the gamut from summaries to close paraphrases to text being taken directly. This material was gathered and adapted for use by the DOE's Office of History and Heritage Resources. For detailed notes on what sources were used for any particular page, see the footnote at the bottom of the page or its entry in Sources and Notes. For a discussion of the best general sources on the Manhattan Project, see the Suggested Readings.

65

Manhattan Project: Facts About Fallout  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

FACTS ABOUT FALLOUT FACTS ABOUT FALLOUT Federal Civil Defense Administration, National Archives (1955) Resources > Library Below is Facts About Fallout, an eight-page civil defense pamphlet on fallout published by the Federal Civil Defense Administration in 1955. At the bottom of this page there are also three photographs of government-suggested fallout shelter designs and a "Fallout Shelter" sign. The pamphlet is courtesy the National Archives, as are the three photographs of the fallout shelters (courtesy the Federal Emergency Management Agency). The image of the "fallout shelter" sign is courtesy the Environmental Protection Agency. Facts About Fallout, p. 1 Facts About Fallout, p. 2 Facts About Fallout, p. 3 Facts About Fallout, p. 4 Facts About Fallout, p. 5

66

Recovery Act milestone: Excavation begins at Manhattan Project landfill  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Recovery Act milestone Recovery Act milestone Recovery Act milestone: Excavation begins at Manhattan Project landfill The six-acre site contains a series of trenches used from 1944 to 1948 to dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous trash from Manhattan Project labs and buildings. July 1, 2010 Los Alamos National Laboratory sits on top of a once-remote mesa in northern New Mexico with the Jemez mountains as a backdrop to research and innovation covering multi-disciplines from bioscience, sustainable energy sources, to plasma physics and new materials. Los Alamos National Laboratory sits on top of a once-remote mesa in northern New Mexico with the Jemez mountains as a backdrop to research and innovation covering multi-disciplines from bioscience, sustainable energy sources, to plasma physics and new materials.

67

Manhattan Project: S-1 Committee  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings S-1 COMMITTEE Bohemian Grove (September 13, 1942) Resources > Photo Gallery S-1 Committee, Bohemian Grove, September 13, 1942 S-1 Committee members at Bohemian Grove, September 13, 1942. Left to right: Harold C. Urey, Ernest O. Lawrence, James B. Conant, Lyman J. Briggs, Eger V. Murphree, and Arthur H. Compton. The photograph is courtesy Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Click on a link below to return to: Civilian Organizations Enter the Army, 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD)

68

Manhattan Project: Los Alamos Scientists  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings LOS ALAMOS SCIENTISTS Los Alamos (Laboratory) (August 1946) Resources > Photo Gallery Los Alamos, August 1946 Scientists attending a colloquium at Los Alamos, August 1946. Left to right, first row: Norris E. Bradbury, John H. Manley, Enrico Fermi, J. M. B. Kellogg. Second row: Robert Oppenheimer, Richard P. Feynman, Phil B. Porter. Third row: Gregory Breit (partially hidden), Arthur Hemmendinger, Arthur D. Schelberg. The photograph is courtesy Los Alamos National Laboratory. The identifications are from Richard G. Hewlett and Francis Duncan, Atomic Shield, 1947-1952: Volume II, A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission (Washington: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1972), opposite page 46.

69

Manhattan Project: Trinity (Color Photograph)  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

(COLOR PHOTOGRAPH) (COLOR PHOTOGRAPH) Trinity Test Site (July 16, 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery Trinity, July 16, 1945 (This is the page for the photograph only; see "The Trinity Test" for more information about the test itself.) The photo is courtesy Los Alamos National Laboratories; it is reproduced on the front cover of Los Alamos: Beginning of an Era, 1943-1945 (Los Alamos: Public Relations Office, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, ca. 1967-1971). The inside of the front cover describes the history of the photograph this way: Although colored movies were taken of the Trinity test, they were of poor quality and have since deteriorated. This cover photograph, also showing the ravages of time, is the only existing color shot of the test. It was taken, surprisingly enough, by an amateur using his own camera. Jack Aeby, now [ca. 1967-1971] of H-6, was working at Trinity with Emilio Segrè studying delayed gamma rays. Segrè secured permission for Aeby to carry his camera to the site to record the group's activities. Came the test and, as Aeby says, 'it was there so I shot it.' The picture was taken from just outside Base Camp with a Perfex 33 camera using 33 mm film. The photograph provided the basis for the Theoretical Division's earliest calculations of the Trinity weapon's yield and was shortly confiscated by the Army and first published after the announcement was made of the bombing of Japan.

70

The Manhattan Project: A 70th Anniversary Observance | OSTI,...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

OSTI has been making government R&D results open and transparent since 1947 The Manhattan Project: A 70th Anniversary Observance atomic energy molecule showing a nucleus...

71

Special Resource Study/Environmental Assessment for Manhattan Project Sites, DOE/EA-1868 (September 2010)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The purpose of this study is to comply with the Manhattan Project National Historical Park Study Act (Public Law 108-340), passed in 2004, which directed the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a...

72

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Joe 1, the first Soviet atomic test, August 29, 1949. NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION Joe 1, the first Soviet atomic test, August 29, 1949. NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION (1949-Present) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Even before the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, many of the scientists of the Manhattan Project were arguing that international control of atomic energy was essential. Any modern, industrialized state, they reasoned, could eventually build its own atomic bomb if it so chose. There was no "secret" scientific theory or principle concerning the bomb. Its possibility was fundamental to modern physics. Then as now, the primary difficulties were engineering related: separating uranium-235 or producing plutonium and designing and building the actual weapon.

73

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Joseph Stalin, Yalta, Russia, February 9, 1945 FIRST STEPS TOWARD INTERNATIONAL CONTROL Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Joseph Stalin, Yalta, Russia, February 9, 1945 FIRST STEPS TOWARD INTERNATIONAL CONTROL (1941-July 1945) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Throughout most of the Second World War, officials gave little consideration to the postwar atom. Even at the top echelons of government, few knew of the Manhattan Project, and among those who did the primary concern was the ultimate success of the bomb development and not possible impact of the bomb on postwar international relations. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Vannevar Bush, director of the Office of Science and Research and Development and perhaps the President’s closest adviser on the bomb, discussed "after-war control" on October 9, 1941, "at some length" but there was no follow-up.

74

Manhattan Project: The "Big House"  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

THE "BIG HOUSE" THE "BIG HOUSE" Los Alamos Boys Ranch School and Los Alamos (The Town) Resources > Photo Gallery The "Big House," Los Alamos. The "Big House" was the dormitory for the Los Alamos Boys Ranch School. Students slept year-round on its unheated porches. During the Manhattan Project, the Big House contained, among other things, a library, the Chaplain's Office, and the Red Cross headquarters. Privileged guests and high-ranking civilians also sometimes stayed there. The photograph above is reproduced from Edith C. Truslow, with Kasha V. Thayer, ed., Manhattan Engineer District: Nonscientific Aspects of Los Alamos Project Y, 1942 through 1946 (Los Alamos, NM: Manhattan Engineer District, ca. 1946; first printed by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory as LA-5200, March 1973; reprinted in 1997 by the Los Alamos Historical Society), 58. The photograph below is of a group of Ranch School students in front of the Big House; it is reproduced from "Dateline: Los Alamos," a special issue of the monthly publication of Los Alamos National Laboratory (1995), 7. At the bottom is an "establishing shot" of Los Alamos in which Fuller Lodge and the Big House are visible in the distance to the left and the right, respectively; click here for more information on this photograph.

75

Manhattan Project: How to Navigate this Site  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS SITE HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS SITE Resources > Navigation There are five main topical areas on this web site: Events, People, Places, Processes, and Science. These are further divided into sub-sections, each with its own introduction. The main topical areas can be accessed by clicking on a button on the horizontal bar above. Sub-sections can be accessed by clicking on a topic in the vertical column to your left. If you would like to begin with a quick survey of the Manhattan Project, try reading, in order, the eight Event sub-section pages, beginning with Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939. In addition to the main topical areas, the Resources section on the above button bar provides access to a variety of resource materials, including photos, documents, maps, and published histories.

76

Manhattan Project: Groves and the MED, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Colonel James Marshall, 1946 GROVES AND THE MED Colonel James Marshall, 1946 GROVES AND THE MED (1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 The summer of 1942 proved to be a troublesome one for the fledgling bomb project. Colonel James C. Marshall (right) received the assignment of directing the Laboratory for the Development of Substitute Metals, or DSM, the military's initial cover name for the project. Marshall immediately moved from Syracuse, where he served in the Corps's Syracuse Engineer District, to New York City. Concerned that the name DSM would attract too much attention, the military set up the Manhattan Engineer District (MED), established by general order on August 13. Marshall, like most other Army officers, knew nothing of nuclear physics. Furthermore, Marshall and his Army superiors were disposed to move cautiously. In one case, for instance, Marshall delayed purchase of an excellent production site in Tennessee pending further study, while the scientists who had been involved in the project from the start were pressing for immediate purchase. Although Vannevar Bush had carefully managed the transition to Army control, there was not yet a mechanism to arbitrate disagreements between the S-1 Committee and the military. The resulting lack of coordination complicated attempts to gain a higher priority for scarce materials and boded ill for the future of the entire bomb project.

77

EA-1903: Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, 3: Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan, Kansas EA-1903: Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan, Kansas SUMMARY This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to use Congressional Directed funds to develop the Great Plains Wind Energy Consortium aimed at increasing the penetration of wind energy via distributed wind power generation throughout the region. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD October 21, 2013 EA-1903: Notice of Extension Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan, Kansas September 11, 2013 EA-1903: Draft Environmental Assessment Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan, Kansas September 11, 2013

78

Manhattan Project: Alpha Racetrack, Y-12  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

photograph, click here or on the photograph above. The photograph is courtesy the Manhattan Engineer District. The photograph was taken by Ed Westcott. Click on a link below to...

79

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Bernard Baruch presents the United States plan for international control of atomic energy to the United Nations, June 14, 1946. NEGOTIATING INTERNATIONAL CONTROL Bernard Baruch presents the United States plan for international control of atomic energy to the United Nations, June 14, 1946. NEGOTIATING INTERNATIONAL CONTROL (December 1945-1946) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present After American, British, and Canadian officials agreed at the November 1945 Washington meeting to a negotiating approach on international control, Secretary of State James F. Byrnes quickly arranged for the Big Three foreign ministers to meet in Moscow in mid-December. Atomic energy, which the Soviets placed last on a long list of agenda items, was discussed only in terms of the United Nations proposal. Surprising Byrnes with their willingness to cooperate, the Soviets acquiesced to the American proposal, which was based on the Washington joint declaration, but with one exception. They agreed that the commission should be set up by the United Nations General Assembly, but, counter to the American plan, they insisted that the commission report to the Security Council and be accountable to it "in matters affecting security." This was no mere procedural difference. Most of the members in the General Assembly, where decisions were made by majority rule, were more closely aligned to the United States than to the Soviet Union. In the Security Council, the Soviet Union possessed the veto and could effectively halt any commission actions that it found objectionable.

80

New Manhattan Project Resource Page Launched | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Manhattan Project Resource Page Launched Manhattan Project Resource Page Launched New Manhattan Project Resource Page Launched July 16, 2013 - 5:48pm Addthis General Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer are pictured here at the Trinity Test site in New Mexico, 1945. General Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer are pictured here at the Trinity Test site in New Mexico, 1945. Terry Fehner Terry Fehner Historian, Federal Preservation Officer Andy Weston-Dawkes Director of the Office of Classification What are the key facts? From Trinity to today -- learn about the Department's direct connection with the Manhattan Project here. Sixty-eight years ago today, on an isolated corner of the Alamogordo Bombing Range in southern New Mexico, the atomic age began. At precisely 5:30 a.m., a device fueled with about 13½ pounds of plutonium, in a weapon

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Manhattan Project: Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer EVALUATIONS OF TRINITY Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer EVALUATIONS OF TRINITY (July 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Only minutes after the world's first ever atomic explosion, Leslie Groves and Robert Oppenheimer (above) began composing their report for the Secretary of War and President Truman. There was a sense of urgency surrounding this notification, as Truman had already arrived at Potsdam (outside of Berlin) to confer with other Allied leaders on the conclusion of the war with Japan. Now that the potential of the bomb had been proven, the calculations behind the Potsdam negotiations were dramatically different.

82

The Manhattan Project By Terrence R. Fehner and F.G. Gosling  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Manhattan Project Manhattan Project By Terrence R. Fehner and F.G. Gosling April 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Management Office of the Executive Secretariat Office of History and Heritage Resources 1 Introduction In a national survey at the turn of the millennium, both journalists and the public ranked the dropping of the atomic bomb and the end of the Second World War as the top news stories of the twentieth-century. The Manhattan Project is the story of some of the most renowned scientists of the century combining with industry, the military, and tens of thousands of ordinary Americans working at sites across the country to translate original

83

Manhattan Project: F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

F REACTOR PLUTONIUM PRODUCTION COMPLEX F REACTOR PLUTONIUM PRODUCTION COMPLEX Hanford Engineer Works, 1945 Resources > Photo Gallery Plutonium production area, Hanford, ca. 1945 The F Reactor plutonium production complex at Hanford. The "boxy" building between the two water towers on the right is the plutonium production reactor; the long building in the center of the photograph is the water treatment plant. The photograph was reproduced from Henry DeWolf Smyth, Atomic Energy for Military Purposes: The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb under the Auspices of the United States Government, 1940-1945 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945). The Smyth Report was commissioned by Leslie Groves and originally issued by the Manhattan Engineer District. Princeton University Press reprinted it in book form as a "public service" with "reproduction in whole or in part authorized and permitted."

84

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Secretary of State James F. Byrnes arrive at the Gatow Airport in Berlin for the Potsdam Conference, July 15, 1945. SEARCH FOR A POLICY ON INTERNATIONAL CONTROL Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Secretary of State James F. Byrnes arrive at the Gatow Airport in Berlin for the Potsdam Conference, July 15, 1945. SEARCH FOR A POLICY ON INTERNATIONAL CONTROL (August to November 1945) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present In the immediate aftermath of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, President Harry S. Truman and his top officials viewed the Soviet Union as the primary stumbling block in the move toward international control of the atomic bomb. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson and Secretary of State James F. Byrnes represented the two poles of an uncertain and divided policy. Despite his ongoing misgivings concerning the Soviets, Stimson determined that unless the United States offered full partnership in the development of atomic energy the Soviet Union would begin "a secret armament race of a rather desperate character." Byrnes, on the eve of the first postwar foreign ministers conference to be held in London, remained adamant in opposition to any attempt to cooperate with the Soviets on atomic energy and viewed the bomb as a diplomatic asset that would make the Soviets more amenable. As Stimson observed in his diary, Byrnes went to London fully set on having "the implied threat of the bomb in his pocket during the conference."

85

Manhattan Project: Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The Smyth Report, August 1945. NUCLEAR ENERGY AND THE The Smyth Report, August 1945. NUCLEAR ENERGY AND THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO KNOW Resources > Openness Given ongoing concerns with terrorism and nuclear proliferation, a word about secrecy, the information presented on this web site, and the public's right to know is in order. The information on this web site is currently available, and has long been available, in any major university library. The basic story of the Manhattan Project was first released to the public in August 1945 in the "Smyth Report" (right), a book-length study of the Manhattan Project. It was personally reviewed by Leslie Groves, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest O. Lawrence, and others, to ensure that it contained no information that would be of assistance to anyone who might try to build a nuclear weapon. The information from the Smyth Report and other contemporary MED press releases has been supplemented in subsequent years by numerous other histories of the Manhattan Project, including a comprehensive official history produced by the Atomic Energy Henry D. Smyth confers with Ernest O. Lawrence about the Smyth Report, Berkeley, fall 1944. Commission (AEC) historians Richard G. Hewlett and Oscar E. Anderson, Jr. As for the most potentially-sensitive category of entries on this web site, "Science," most of the text for these entries was taken directly from an unclassified 1963 AEC publication, The Atomic Energy Deskbook. Created under the personal supervision of AEC Chairman Glenn T. Seaborg, the Deskbook was intended from the start to be a reference work for the public. The intent of all of these publications was to reveal what could be revealed and to keep secret what needed to be kept secret. Accordingly, this web site has been reviewed by the Department of Energy's Office of Classification and confirmed to be unclassified. (For more information on Manhattan Project-related publications, see the list of "Suggested Readings.")

86

''Mini-Manhattan Project'' for Cellulases (Revision)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is working to make ethanol Americas automotive fuel of the future by domestically producing it from lignocellulosic biomass, the most abundant renewable resource on earth.

Not Available

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

Manhattan Project: Adventures Inside the Atom  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

ADVENTURES INSIDE THE ATOM ADVENTURES INSIDE THE ATOM General Electric, National Archives (1948) Resources > Library Below is Adventures Inside the Atom, a comic book history of nuclear energy that was produced in 1948 by the General Electric Company. Scroll down to view the full-size images of each page. This publication was produced at the request of the the Assistant Manager for Public Education, Oak Ridge Operations Office, Atomic Energy Commission. It is reproduced here via the National Archives. Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 1 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 2 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 3 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 4 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 5 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 6 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 7 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 8 Adventures Inside the Atom, p. 9

88

Manhattan Project: The Maud Report, 1941  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The first page of the MAUD Report. THE MAUD REPORT The first page of the MAUD Report. THE MAUD REPORT (1941) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 The most influential study of the feasibility of the atomic bomb originated on the other side of the Atlantic. In July 1941, just days after finding the second National Academy of Sciences report so disappointing, Vannevar Bush received a copy of a draft report forwarded from the National Defense Research Committee liaison office in London. The report, prepared by a group codenamed the MAUD Committee and set up by the British in spring 1940 to study the possibility of developing a nuclear weapon, maintained that a sufficiently purified critical mass of uranium-235 could fission even with fast neutrons. Building upon theoretical work on atomic bombs performed by refugee physicists Rudolf Peierls and Otto Frisch in 1940 and 1941, the MAUD report estimated that a critical mass of ten kilograms would be large enough to produce an enormous explosion. A bomb this size could be loaded on existing aircraft and be ready in approximately two years.

89

Manhattan Project: More Uranium Research, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Cubes of uranium metal, Los Alamos, 1945 MORE URANIUM RESEARCH Cubes of uranium metal, Los Alamos, 1945 MORE URANIUM RESEARCH (1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 During the first half of 1942, several routes to a bomb via uranium continued to be explored. At Columbia University, Harold Urey worked on the gaseous diffusion and centrifuge systems for isotope separation in the codenamed SAM (Substitute or Special Alloy Metals) Laboratory. At Berkeley, Ernest Lawrence continued his investigations on electromagnetic separation using the "calutron" he had converted from his thirty-seven-inch cyclotron. Phillip Abelson, who had moved from the Carnegie Institution and the National Bureau of Standards to the Naval Research Laboratory, continued his work on liquid thermal diffusion but with few positive results, and he had lost all contact with the S-1 Section of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Meanwhile Eger Murphree's group hurriedly studied ways to move from laboratory experiments to production facilities.

90

Manhattan Project: Picking Horses, November 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

General Leslie Groves PICKING HORSES General Leslie Groves PICKING HORSES (November 1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 Leslie Groves (right) moved swiftly to make good on his new timetable by scheduling a decisive meeting of the Military Policy Committee for November 12, 1942, and of the S-1 Executive Committee for November 14. The scientists at each of the institutions doing isotope separation research knew these meetings would determine the uranium-235 separation method to be used in the bomb project; therefore, the keen competition among the institutions added to the sense of urgency created by the war. Ernest Lawrence's team working on the electromagnetic method at the University of California, Berkeley, remained the most optimistic team working on uranium enrichment. The gaseous diffusion research being conducted at Columbia University continued to meet serious difficulties, but it was still considered a viable option. The big loser of the November meetings was the centrifuge process, which was finally dropped from consideration.

91

Manhattan Project: The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

American troops approaching the beach, D-Day, June 6, 1944. THE WAR ENTERS ITS FINAL PHASE American troops approaching the beach, D-Day, June 6, 1944. THE WAR ENTERS ITS FINAL PHASE (1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Harry Truman being sworn in as president, April 12, 1945. On April 12, 1945, only weeks before Germany's unconditional surrender on May 7, President Franklin Roosevelt died suddenly in Warm Springs, Georgia. Vice President Harry S. Truman, a veteran of the United States Senate, was now president. Truman had not been privy to many of Roosevelt's internal policy deliberations and had to be briefed extensively in his first weeks in office. One of these briefings, provided by Secretary of War Henry Stimson on April 25, concerned S-1 (the Manhattan Project). Stimson, with Leslie Groves present during part of the meeting, traced the history of the Manhattan Project, summarized its status, and detailed the timetable for testing and combat delivery. Truman asked numerous questions during the forty-five minute meeting and made it clear that he understood the relevance of the atomic bomb to upcoming diplomatic and military initiatives.

92

The Manhattan Project: Science in the Second World War  

SciTech Connect

The Manhattan Project: Science in the Second World War'' is a short history of the origins and development of the American atomic bomb program during World War II. Beginning with the scientific developments of the pre-war years, the monograph details of the role of the United States government in conducting a secret, nationwide enterprise that took science from the laboratory and into combat with an entirely new type of weapon. The monograph concludes with a discussion of the immediate postwar period, the debate over the Atomic Energy Act of 1946, and the founding of the Atomic Energy Commission.

Gosling, F.G.

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

93

The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb. 1999 edition.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

``The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb`` is a short history of the origins and development of the American atomic bomb program during World War II. Beginning with the scientific developments of the pre-war years, the monograph details the role of the United States government in conducting a secret, nationwide enterprise that took science from the laboratory and into combat with an entirely new type of weapon. The monograph concludes with a discussion of the immediate postwar period, the debate over the Atomic Energy Act of 1946, and the founding of the Atomic Energy Commission.

Gosling, F.G.

1999-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

Manhattan Project: Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Trinity test radiation safety team SAFETY AND THE TRINITY TEST Trinity test radiation safety team SAFETY AND THE TRINITY TEST (Trinity Test Site, July 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Bunker at S-10,000 The "Trinity" atomic test was the most violent man-made explosion in history to that date. It also posed the single most significant safety hazard of the entire Manhattan Project. Understanding this, test planners chose a flat, desert scrub region in the northwest corner of the isolated Alamogordo Bombing Range in south central New Mexico for the test. This location, 210 miles south of Los Alamos, was only twenty miles from the nearest offsite habitation. If the explosion was considerably larger than predicted, the dangers could be extreme to the test personnel and surrounding areas.

95

Manhattan Project: Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Trinity, July 16, 1945 DAWN OF THE ATOMIC ERA (1945) Events The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 As the war entered its final phase, the Manhattan Project became an increasingly important and controversial element in American strategy. Debate over how to use the bomb began in earnest in early summer of 1945. The Trinity atomic test of July 16 (right) confirmed that the stakes for this decision were very high. With a blast equivalent of approximately 21 kilotons of TNT, the test explosion was greater than had been predicted, and the dispersal of radioactive fallout following the test made safety something of a near thing. News of the success at Trinity reached President Harry S. Truman at the Potsdam Conference.

96

Manhattan Project: Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Entrance to the Los Alamos "Tech Area" ESTABLISHING LOS ALAMOS Entrance to the Los Alamos "Tech Area" ESTABLISHING LOS ALAMOS (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1942-1943) Events > Bringing it All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 Map of Los Alamos, New Mexico. The final link in the Manhattan Project's far-flung network was the bomb research and development laboratory at Los Alamos, located in the mountains of northern New Mexico. Codenamed "Project Y," the laboratory that designed and fabricated the first atomic bombs began to take shape in spring 1942 when James Conant suggested to Vannevar Bush that the Office of Scientific and Research Development and the Army form a committee to study bomb development. Bush agreed and forwarded the recommendation to Vice President Henry Wallace, Secretary of War Henry Stimson, and General George Marshall (the Top Policy Group). By the time of his appointment in late September, Leslie Groves had orders to set up a committee to study military applications of the bomb. Meanwhile, sentiment was growing among the Manhattan Project scientists that research on the bomb project needed to be better coordinated. Robert Oppenheimer, among others, advocated a central facility where theoretical and experimental work could be conducted according to standard scientific protocols. This would insure accuracy and speed progress. Oppenheimer suggested that the bomb design laboratory operate secretly in an isolated area but allow free exchange of ideas among the scientists on the staff. Groves accepted Oppenheimer's suggestion and began seeking an appropriate location. By the end of the year, they had settled on an unlikely site for the laboratory: an isolated boys' school on a mesa high in the Jemez Mountains (map at left).

97

Why Star Wars is not like the Manhattan Project  

SciTech Connect

The absence of a viable plan appears to enhance the strength of the Strategic defense initiative (SDI) advocates' position that this is their opportunity to emulate the Manhattan Project. The author argues that this is a false analogy, that the critics need a less glamorous argument than identifying SDI with Star Wars. Quoting from Freemon Dyson's Weapons and Hope, he notes that the goal of rendering nuclear weapons obsolete is a grant technical folly more analogous to the nuclear airplane project. Rationalizations enable special-interest groups to pursue narrow technical concerns without worrying about the original goal. The driving force of the arms race has made the hydrogen bomb almost irrelevant through technical obsolescence, yet a decision not to test it might have deterred the Soviets as well. A rejection of Star Wars offers a similar opportunity to preclude a new arms race.

Tierney, J.

1985-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

98

Manhattan Project: Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Norris Bradbury, Robert Oppenheimer, Richard Feynman, Enrico Fermi, and others, Los Alamos, 1946 BASIC RESEARCH AT LOS ALAMOS Norris Bradbury, Robert Oppenheimer, Richard Feynman, Enrico Fermi, and others, Los Alamos, 1946 BASIC RESEARCH AT LOS ALAMOS (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 Enrico Fermi The first few months at Los Alamos were occupied with briefings on nuclear physics for the technical staff and with planning research priorities and organizing the laboratory. Leslie Groves called once again on Warren Lewis to head a committee, this time to evaluate the Los Alamos program. The committee's recommendations resulted in the coordinated effort envisioned by those who advocated a unified laboratory for bomb research. Enrico Fermi (left) took control of critical mass experiments and standardization of measurement Hans Bethe techniques. Plutonium purification work, begun at the Met Lab, became high priority at Los Alamos, and increased attention was paid to metallurgy. The committee also recommended that an engineering division be organized to collaborate with physicists on bomb design and fabrication. The laboratory was thus organized into four divisions: theoretical (Hans A. Bethe, right); experimental physics (Robert F. Bacher); chemistry and metallurgy (Joseph W. Kennedy); and ordnance (Navy Captain William S. "Deke" Parsons). Like other Manhattan Project installations, Los Alamos soon began to expand beyond initial expectations.

99

Manhattan Project: Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Ernest Lawrence, Arthur Compton, Vannevar Bush, James Conant, Karl Compton, and Alfred Loomis, Berkeley, 1940 DEBATE OVER HOW TO USE THE BOMB Ernest Lawrence, Arthur Compton, Vannevar Bush, James Conant, Karl Compton, and Alfred Loomis, Berkeley, 1940 DEBATE OVER HOW TO USE THE BOMB (Washington, D.C., Late Spring 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Ernest Lawrence In early May 1945, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, with the approval of President Harry S. Truman, formed an Interim Committee of top officials charged with recommending the proper use of atomic weapons in wartime and developing a position for the United States on postwar atomic policy. Stimson headed the advisory group composed of Vannevar Bush, James Conant, Karl T. Compton, Under Secretary of the Navy Ralph A. Bard, Assistant Secretary of State William L. Clayton, and future Secretary of State James F. Byrnes. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, Arthur Compton, and Ernest Lawrence served as scientific advisors (the Scientific Panel), while General George Marshall represented the military. The committee met on May 31 and then again the next day with leaders from the business side of the Manhattan Project, including Walter S. Carpenter of DuPont, James C. White of Tennessee Eastman, George H. Bucher of Westinghouse, and James A. Rafferty of Union Carbide.

100

MANHATTAN DISTRICT HISTORY PROJECT Y THE LOS ALAMOS PROJECT VOL. I INCEPTION UNTIL AUGUST 1945  

SciTech Connect

THESE TWO VOLUMES CONSTITUTE A RECORD OF THE TECHNICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE , AND POLICY-MAKING ACTIVITIES OF THE LOS ALAMOS PROJECT (PROJECT Y) F ROM ITS INCEPTION UNDER THE MANHATTAN DISTRICT THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ATOMIC BOMB (VOL. I), AND DURING THE PERIOD FOLLOWING THE END OF WORLD WAR II UNTIL THE MANHATTAN DISTRICT RELINQUISHED CONTROL TO T HE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION AS OF JANUARY 1947 (VOL. II). ALTHOUGH SEC URITY REGULATIONS HAVE REQUIRED SOME DELETIONS IN THE ORIGINAL TEXT OF THE TWO VOLUMES, EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO RETAIN THE ORIGINAL LA NGUAGE AND EXPRESSIONS OF THE AUTHORS.

Hawkins, D.

1961-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

MANHATTAN DISTRICT HISTORY PROJECT Y THE LOS ALAMOS PROJECT VOL. II AUGUST 1945 THROUGH DECEMBER 1946  

SciTech Connect

THESE TWO VOLUMES CONSTITUTE A RECORD OF THE TECHNICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE , AND POLICY-MAKING ACTIVITIES OF THE LOS ALAMOS PROJECT (PROJECT Y) F ROM ITS INCEPTION UNDER THE MANHATTAN DISTRICT THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ATOMIC BOMB (VOL. I), AND DURING THE PERIOD FOLLOWING THE END OF WORLD WAR II UNTIL THE MANHATTAN DISTRICT RELINQUISHED CONTROL TO T HE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION AS OF JANUARY 1947 (VOL. II). ALTHOUGH SEC URITY REGULATIONS HAVE REQUIRED SOME DELETIONS IN THE ORIGINAL TEXT OF THE TWO VOLUMES, EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO RETAIN THE ORIGINAL LA NGUGAGE AND EXPERSSIONS OF THE AUTHORS.

Truslow, E. C.; Smith, R. C.

1961-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

Manhattan Project: The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Diffusion columns, S-50 Thermal Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge, 1945. THE NAVY AND THERMAL DIFFUSION Diffusion columns, S-50 Thermal Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge, 1945. THE NAVY AND THERMAL DIFFUSION (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1944) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 As problems with both Y-12 and K-25 reached crisis proportions in spring and summer 1944, the Manhattan Project received help from an unexpected source: the United States Navy. President Roosevelt had instructed that the atomic bomb effort be an Army program and that the Navy be excluded from deliberations. Navy research on atomic power, conducted primarily for submarines, received no direct aid from Leslie Groves, who, in fact, was not up-to-date on the state of Navy efforts when he received a letter on the subject from Robert Oppenheimer late in April 1944.

103

Manhattan Project: The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF HIROSHIMA Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF HIROSHIMA (Hiroshima, Japan, August 6, 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 In the early morning hours of August 6, 1945, a B-29 bomber named Enola Gay took off from the island of Tinian and headed north by northwest toward Japan. The bomber's primary target was the city of Hiroshima, located on the deltas of southwestern Honshu Island facing the Inland Sea. Hiroshima had a civilian population of almost 300,000 and was an important military center, containing about 43,000 soldiers.

104

Manhattan Project: The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF NAGASAKI Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF NAGASAKI (Nagasaki, Japan, August 9, 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 The next break in the weather over Japan was due to appear just three days after the attack on Hiroshima, to be followed by at least five more days of prohibitive weather. The plutonium implosion bomb, nicknamed "Fat Man," was rushed into readiness to take advantage of this window. No further orders were required for the attack. Truman's order of July 25th had authorized the dropping of additional bombs as soon as they were ready. At 3:47 a.m. on August 9, 1945, a B-29 named Bock's Car lifted off from Tinian and headed toward the primary target: Kokura Arsenal, a massive collection of war industries adjacent to the city of Kokura.

105

Manhattan Project: Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Japanese envoys arrive on board the U.S.S. Missouri for the surrender ceremony, Tokyo Bay, September 2, 1945. JAPAN SURRENDERS Japanese envoys arrive on board the U.S.S. Missouri for the surrender ceremony, Tokyo Bay, September 2, 1945. JAPAN SURRENDERS (August 10-15, 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Prior to the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, elements existed within the Japanese government that were trying to find a way to end the war. In June and July 1945, Japan attempted to enlist the help of the Soviet Union to serve as an intermediary in negotiations. No direct communication occurred with the United States about peace talks, but American leaders knew of these maneuvers because the United States for a long time had been intercepting and decoding many internal Japanese diplomatic communications. From these intercepts, the United States learned that some within the Japanese government advocated outright surrender. A few diplomats overseas cabled home to urge just that.

106

MANHATTAN PROJECT B REACTOR HANFORD WASHINGTON [HANFORD'S HISTORIC B REACTOR (12-PAGE BOOKLET)  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Site began as part of the United States Manhattan Project to research, test and build atomic weapons during World War II. The original 670-square mile Hanford Site, then known as the Hanford Engineer Works, was the last of three top-secret sites constructed in order to produce enriched uranium and plutonium for the world's first nuclear weapons. B Reactor, located about 45 miles northwest of Richland, Washington, is the world's first full-scale nuclear reactor. Not only was B Reactor a first-of-a-kind engineering structure, it was built and fully functional in just 11 months. Eventually, the shoreline of the Columbia River in southeastern Washington State held nine nuclear reactors at the height of Hanford's nuclear defense production during the Cold War era. The B Reactor was shut down in 1968. During the 1980's, the U.S. Department of Energy began removing B Reactor's support facilities. The reactor building, the river pumphouse and the reactor stack are the only facilities that remain. Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office offers escorted public access to B Reactor along a designated tour route. The National Park Service (NPS) is studying preservation and interpretation options for sites associated with the Manhattan Project. A draft is expected in summer 2009. A final report will recommend whether the B Reactor, along with other Manhattan Project facilities, should be preserved, and if so, what roles the DOE, the NPS and community partners will play in preservation and public education. In August 2008, the DOE announced plans to open B Reactor for additional public tours. Potential hazards still exist within the building. However, the approved tour route is safe for visitors and workers. DOE may open additional areas once it can assure public safety by mitigating hazards.

GERBER MS

2009-04-28T23:59:59.000Z

107

Manhattan Project: Implosion Becomes a Necessity, Los Alamos, 1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Implosion IMPLOSION BECOMES A NECESSITY Implosion IMPLOSION BECOMES A NECESSITY (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1944) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 An early implosion experiment, Los Alamos, 1944 Because the gun-type bomb design seemed so simple and practical, Deke Parsons had assigned implosion studies a low priority and placed the emphasis on the more familiar artillery method. Consequently, Seth H. Neddermeyer performed his early implosion tests in relative obscurity. Neddermeyer found it difficult to achieve symmetrical implosions at the low velocities he had achieved. When the Princeton mathematician John von Neumann, a Hungarian refugee, visited Los Alamos late in 1943, he suggested that high-speed assembly and high velocities would prevent predetonation and achieve more symmetrical explosions. A relatively small, subcritical mass could be placed under so much pressure by a symmetrical implosion that an efficient detonation would occur. Less fissionable material would be required, bombs could be ready earlier, and extreme purification of plutonium would be unnecessary. Von Neumann's theories excited Robert Oppenheimer, who assigned Parsons's deputy, George B. Kistiakowsky, the task of perfecting implosion techniques. (Kistiakowsky would later become President Dwight D. Eisenhower's science adviser.) Because Parsons and Neddermeyer did not get along, it was Kistiakowsky who worked with the scientists on the implosion project.

108

Manhattan Project: Bringing it All Together, 1942-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Eric Jette, Charles Critchfield, and J. Robert Oppenheimer, Los Alamos BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER Eric Jette, Charles Critchfield, and J. Robert Oppenheimer, Los Alamos BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER (1942-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 No matter how much enriched uranium and plutonium might be produced at Oak Ridge and Hanford, it would all come to nothing if workable weapon designs could not be developed in time. To this end, in late 1942 Leslie Groves established a bomb research and development laboratory at Los Alamos in the remote mountains of northern New Mexico. The early work at Los Alamos concentrated primarily on defining the problems that needed to be solved. Basic research on a variety of theoretical issues continued throughout 1943. By 1944, it had become clear that, while a simple and reliable "gun-type" design could be used for a uranium bomb, the considerably more complicated implosion method would be required to produce a plutonium weapon. With the successful Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer Allied landings in France on "D-Day," June 6, 1944, the war in Europe appeared to be entering its final phase. Germany ceased to be the primary intended target. General Groves and his advisers turned their sights on Japan, and the rush was on to complete the atomic bomb in time to end the war in the Pacific.

109

Manhattan Project: The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Trinity test, July 16, 1945 THE TRINITY TEST Trinity test, July 16, 1945 THE TRINITY TEST (Trinity Test Site, July 16, 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Bunker at S-10,000 Until the atomic bomb could be tested, doubt would remain about its effectiveness. The world had never seen a nuclear explosion before, and estimates varied widely on how much energy would be released. Some scientists at Los Alamos continued privately to have doubts that it would work at all. There was only enough weapons-grade uranium available for one bomb, and confidence in the gun-type design was high, so on July 14, 1945, most of the uranium bomb ("Little Boy") began its trip westward to the Pacific without its design having ever been fully tested. A test of the plutonium bomb seemed vital, however, both to confirm its novel implosion design and to gather data on nuclear explosions in general. Several plutonium bombs were now "in the pipeline" and would be available over the next few weeks and months. It was therefore decided to test one of these.

110

Manhattan Project: Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex at Hanford, 1945 HANFORD BECOMES OPERATIONAL F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex at Hanford, 1945 HANFORD BECOMES OPERATIONAL (Hanford Engineer Works, 1943-1944) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 The plutonium production facilities at the Hanford Engineer Works took shape with the same wartime urgency as did the uranium facilities at Oak Ridge. In February 1943, Colonel Matthias returned to the location he had helped select the previous December and set up a temporary headquarters. In late March, Matthias received his assignment. The three water-cooled production reactor (piles), designated by the letters B, D, and F, would be built about six miles apart on the south bank of the Columbia River. The four chemical separation plants would be built in pairs at two sites nearly ten miles south of the piles. A facility to produce slugs and perform tests would be approximately twenty miles southeast of the separation plants near Richland. Temporary quarters for construction workers would be put up at the Hanford town site, while permanent facilities for other personnel would be located down the road in Richland, safely removed from the production and separation plants. Life at Hanford would soon come to resemble that of the other "atomic boomtowns" of the Manhattan Project, Los Alamos and Oak Ridge.

111

NIEHS CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH IN NORTHERN MANHATTAN ANNOUNCEMENT for PILOT PROJECT GRANTS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

NIEHS CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH IN NORTHERN MANHATTAN ANNOUNCEMENT for PILOT PROJECT GRANTS for Environmental Health is seeking innovative and promising pilot projects in all areas of environmental health to be funded soon after April 1st, 2013. Priority for funding will be given to those projects that focus

Qian, Ning

112

NIEHS CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH IN NORTHERN MANHATTAN ANNOUNCEMENT for PILOT PROJECT GRANTS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

NIEHS CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH IN NORTHERN MANHATTAN ANNOUNCEMENT for PILOT PROJECT GRANTS for Environmental Health is seeking innovative and promising pilot projects in all areas of environmental health to be funded as of July 1st , 2012. Priority for funding will be given to those projects that focus

Qian, Ning

113

B&W Y-12 names Carl Strock as UPF Project Director | Y-12 National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

is one of the most important construction projects our nation has embarked upon since the Manhattan Project," said Haynes. "Carl Strock's proven leadership and accomplishments make...

114

What Explains Manhattan's Declining Share of Residential Construction?  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

permits issued in Manhattan, with project level detail:public housing projects permitted in Manhattan and on year.multitous projects the analogous Manhattan share plotted in

DAVIDOFF, THOMAS

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Manhattan Project: Postscript--The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Government-suggested fallout shelter design, 1950s POSTSCRIPT--THE NUCLEAR AGE Government-suggested fallout shelter design, 1950s POSTSCRIPT--THE NUCLEAR AGE (1945-Present) Events Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Joe 1, the first Soviet atomic test, August 29, 1949. The end of the Second World War brought with it a whole new set of issues and problems, not least of which was the dilemma of what to do with the nuclear genie now that he had been let out of the bottle. In the United States, and around the world, news of the atomic bomb created among the public a sense of shock and awe. Manhattan Engineer District officials took certain obvious steps such as slowing down the program from its wartime pace, but the assembly of additional nuclear weapons did quietly continue.

116

Manhattan Project: Operation Crossroads, Bikini Atoll, July 1946  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Crossroads Baker, Bikini Atoll, July 25, 1946 OPERATION CROSSROADS Crossroads Baker, Bikini Atoll, July 25, 1946 OPERATION CROSSROADS (Bikini Atoll, July 1946) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Even after the Trinity test and the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, military officials still knew far less than they would have liked about the effects, especially on naval targets, of nuclear weapons. Accordingly, the Joint Chiefs of Staff requested and received presidential approval to conduct a series of tests during summer 1946. Vice Admiral W. H. P. Blandy, head of the test series task force, proposed calling the series Operation "Crossroads." "It was apparent," he noted, "that warfare, perhaps civilization itself, had been brought to a turning point by this revolutionary weapon."

117

Manhattan Project: The Cold War, 1945-1990  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

West Berliner talks to the East, Berlin Wall, November 1962 THE COLD WAR West Berliner talks to the East, Berlin Wall, November 1962 THE COLD WAR (1945-1990) Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present Informing the Public, August 1945 The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946 First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945 Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945 Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946 Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Operation Crossroads, July 1946 The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980 The Cold War, 1945-1990 Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present Joseph Stalin (with Vyacheslav Molotov), February 1945 The postwar organization of atomic energy took place against the backdrop of growing tension with the Soviet Union. Relations between the United States and the Soviet Union had been strained ever since the revolution of 1917 had first brought communists to power in Russia. This mutual distrust further deepened following the Soviet "non-aggression" treaty with Nazi Germany in August 1939 and the Soviet Union's subsequent invasions of Poland, Finland, and the Baltic Republics. Although Britain was allied with the Soviet Union following Germany's June 1941 invasion of Russia, as was the United States in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, mutual suspicion lingered throughout the Second World War. The failure of the United States and Britain to tell the Soviet Union about the atomic bomb in anything other than the most vague terms only heightened the extreme suspicions of the Soviet dictator, Joseph Stalin (right). Not only did the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki help end the Second World War, but they also played a role in setting the stage for the half-century of conflict with the Soviet Union that followed it -- the Cold War.

118

Mitigation of Selected Hanford Site Manhattan Project and Cold War Era Artifacts  

SciTech Connect

This document is the first time that Manhattan Project and Cold War era artifacts from the Hanford Site have been assembled within a publication. The publication presents photographic and written documentation of a number of Manhattan Project and Cold War era artifacts that were identified and tagged during assessment walk throughs of historic buildings on the Hanford Site but which could not be curated within the Hanford collection because they were too large for long-term storage and/or exhibit purposes or were radiologically contaminated. The significance of the artifacts in this publication and a proposed future appendix is based not on the individual significance of any single artifact but on their collective contribution to the science and engineering of creating plutonium and advancing nuclear technology in nuclear fuel and power.

Kennedy, Ellen P.; Harvey, David W.

2006-09-08T23:59:59.000Z

119

Manhattan Project buildings and facilities at the Hanford Site: A construction history  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document thoroughly examines the role that the Hanford Engineer Works played in the Manhattan project. The historical aspects of the buildings and facilities are characterized. An in depth look at the facilities, including their functions, methods of fabrication and appearance is given for the 100 AREAS, 200 AREAS, 300 AREAS, 500, 800 and 900 AREAS, 600 AREA, 700 AREA, 1100 AREA and temporary construction structures.

Gerber, M.S.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Before the House Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands - Committee on Natural Resources  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Subject: Proposed Manhattan Project National Historical Park By: Ingrid Kolb, Director Office of Management

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Manhattan Project: Order to Drop the Atomic Bomb  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

ORDER TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB Handy to Spaatz, National Archives (July 25, 1945) Resources > Library The document below is the order to attack Japanese cities with atomic bombs. In it, the Acting Army Chief of Staff, Thomas Handy, orders Commanding General Carl Spaatz, Army Strategic Air Forces, to "deliver [the] first special bomb as soon as weather will permit . . . after about 3 August 1945." The target list: "Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki." Further attacks were also authorized: "additional bombs will be delivered on the above targets as soon as made ready." Handy was the acting chief of staff because George Marshall was with President Harry S. Truman at the Potsdam Conference. The letter explicitly notes that this order was approved by Marshall and Secretary of War Henry Stimson. Truman, of course, provided the ultimate authorization for dropping the bomb.

122

Manhattan Project: San Ildefonso Pueblo Party</FONT>  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

SAN ILDEFONSO PUEBLO PARTY SAN ILDEFONSO PUEBLO PARTY Los Alamos (December 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery San Ildefonso Pueblo party, December 1945 A special 1995 issue of the monthly publication of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, "Dateline: Los Alamos," described the party this way: "On a cold December night in 1945, the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a tribe of Native Americans living next to Los Alamos, invited a group of Los Alamos square dancers to their pueblo for an evening of fun and entertainment. The two communities had seen a lot of each other during the war as men and women from the pueblo commuted daily to work at Los Alamos. The association produced a cross fertilization of cultures. "Bernice Brode wrote: 'Some of us had more Indian crafts in our Army apartments than the Indians had in their homes, (and) modern American conveniences such as refrigerators and linoleum began cropping up in the pueblo.' At the dance, the Indians performed for the square dancers and the square dancers performed for the Indians. After the demonstrations, members from the two groups began dancing with each other. Charlie Masters, a teacher at the Los Alamos school, wrote: 'This fiesta-hoedown I like to remember as the climax of our relations with the natives.'

123

Manhattan Project: Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Ernest Lawrence, Arthur Compton, Vannevar Bush, and James Conant discuss uranium research, Berkeley, March 29, 1940. EARLY URANIUM RESEARCH Ernest Lawrence, Arthur Compton, Vannevar Bush, and James Conant discuss uranium research, Berkeley, March 29, 1940. EARLY URANIUM RESEARCH (1939-1941) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 President Franklin D. Roosevelt responded to the call for government support of uranium research quickly but cautiously. He appointed Lyman J. Briggs, director of the National Bureau of Standards, head of the Advisory Committee on Uranium, which met for the first time on October 21, 1939. The committee, including both civilian and military representation, was to coordinate its activities with Alexander Sachs and look into the current state of research on uranium to recommend an appropriate role for the federal government. In early 1940, only months after the outbreak of war in Europe, the Uranium Committee recommended that the government fund limited research on isotope separation as well as Enrico Fermi's and Leo Szilard's work on fission chain reactions at Columbia University (below).

124

Atomic Bombs, Winning the War and Women in Pants: Voices of the Manhattan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Atomic Bombs, Winning the War and Women in Pants: Voices of the Atomic Bombs, Winning the War and Women in Pants: Voices of the Manhattan Project Speak of the Nation's History Atomic Bombs, Winning the War and Women in Pants: Voices of the Manhattan Project Speak of the Nation's History November 28, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Manhattan Project veteran Ralph Gates (far right) celebrates Christmas in 1945. Gates contributed to the Voices of the Manhattan Project, a storytelling project launched by the Atomic Heritage Foundation and Los Alamos Historical Society. Manhattan Project veteran Ralph Gates (far right) celebrates Christmas in 1945. Gates contributed to the Voices of the Manhattan Project, a storytelling project launched by the Atomic Heritage Foundation and Los Alamos Historical Society. WASHINGTON, D.C. - A year out of high school in 1944, Nashville native

125

Manhattan Project: Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, 1944 OAK RIDGE AND HANFORD COME THROUGH Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, 1944 OAK RIDGE AND HANFORD COME THROUGH (Oak Ridge [Clinton] and Hanford, 1944-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 None of Los Alamos's bomb design work would be of any use if Oak Ridge or Hanford did not come through with enough uranium-235 or plutonium for at least one bomb. Spending on the Manhattan Project reached $100 million per month by mid-1944, yet it was still far from clear that enough of either fissionable substance could be produced before war's end. In the summer of 1944, Oak Ridge's Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant (above) was plagued by operational problems, and the ongoing barrier crisis at the K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant threatened to render it useless. At Hanford, the first production reactor had not yet been completed. In addition, officials feared that not enough of the uranium-containing slugs to feed the pile would be available. Even assuming that enough uranium or plutonium could be delivered by Oak Ridge or Hanford, there was no guarantee that the Los Alamos laboratory would be able to design and fabricate weapons in time. Only the most optimistic in the Manhattan Project would have predicted, as Groves did when he met with Marshall in August of 1944, that a bomb or bombs powerful enough to make a difference in the current war would be ready by August 1, 1945.

126

The dragon's tail: Radiation safety in the Manhattan Project  

SciTech Connect

The book's contents are: Introduction: radiation safety in World War II. Foundations of Manhattan Project radiation safety. Role of the Chicago Health Division. Radiation safety at Los Alamos, Trinity. From Japan to Bikini. Crossroads. Epilogue: continuity and change in radiation safety. Appendix: chronological index of radiation exposure standards. Index. The United States Department of Energy and the Energy Research and Development Administration financially supported this book which provides a historical account of radiological safety in nuclear weapons testing during World War II. The author relied on archival sources and the oral testimony of participants and eyewitnesses. He provides a bibliography with full citations.

Hacker, B.C.

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Manhattan Project: Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Werner Heisenberg, the leader of the German atomic weapons program. ATOMIC RIVALS AND THE ALSOS MISSION Werner Heisenberg, the leader of the German atomic weapons program. ATOMIC RIVALS AND THE ALSOS MISSION (Germany and Japan, 1938-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 For most of the Second World War, scientists and administrators of the Manhattan Project firmly believed that they were in a race with Germany to develop the atomic bomb. As it turns out, the German atomic program did not come close to developing a useable weapon. Allied planners were only able to confirm this, however, through the ALSOS intelligence mission to Europe toward the end of the war. Atomic research was also conducted in Japan, but as was suspected by the Allies, it did not get very far.

128

Work on the Manhattan Project, Subsequent Events, and Little Known Facts Related to its Use  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

A personal account of work on the Manhattan Project in Chicago by one of the few remaining survivors of the war-time project is given, illustrating, among other things, how absurd things can happen at a time of great stress and concern.. As is well known, Los Alamos was the site specializing in the physics of the bomb while Chicago emphasized metallurgical and chemical research. Nevertheless, physics played a significant role in Chicago, as well. That is where Fermi constructed the worlds first uranium pile under the stands of Stagg field, a site at which this author got seriously irradiated. Some curious events occurring after the bomb was dropped are also related. In addition, at this time of public protest by sincere people who question the ethics of America for dropping the bomb on innocent civilians, certain facts, obviously unknown to the protesters, are presented which place the bombing in a rather different light.

Bartell, Lawrence S

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

The early development of neutron diffraction: Science in the wings of the Manhattan Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Although neutron diffraction was first observed using radioactive decay sources shortly after the discovery of the neutron, it was only with the availability of higher intensity neutron beams from the first nuclear reactors, constructed as part of the Manhattan project, that systematic investigation of Bragg scattering became possible. Remarkably, at a time when the war effort was singularly focused on the development of the atomic bomb, groups working at Oak Ridge and Chicago carried out key measurements and recognized the future utility of neutron diffraction quite independent of its contributions to the measurements of nuclear cross sections. Ernest O. Wollan, Lyle B. Borst, and Walter H. Zinn were all able to observe neutron diffraction in 1944 using the X-10 graphite reactor and the CP-3 heavy water reactor.

Mason, Thom [ORNL; Gawne, Timothy J [ORNL; Nagler, Stephen E [ORNL; Nestor, Margaret Boone {Bonnie} [ORNL; Carpenter, John M [ORNL

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Manhattan Project: CP-1 Goes Critical, Met Lab, December 2, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Painting of CP-1 going critical CP-1 GOES CRITICAL Painting of CP-1 going critical CP-1 GOES CRITICAL (Met Lab, December 2, 1942) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 While arrangements were proceeding for the construction of full-size plutonium production reactors, critical questions remained about their basic design. The Italian physicist Enrico Fermi hoped to answer some of these questions with CP-1, his experimental "Chicago Pile #1" at the University of Chicago. On December 2, 1942, after a series of frustrating delays, CP-1 first achieved a self-sustaining fission chain reaction. After the end of the war, Leslie Groves, commander of the Manhattan Project, described the first time CP-1 went critical as the single most important scientific event in the development of atomic power.

131

Legacy of a Bomb: The Manhattan Projects Impact on the Scientific Community  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1943-1993). http://10, 2007). Oak Ridge National Laboratory. 2006. Universityeds. 2005. UC and the National Laboratories: Unparalleled

Gao, Jany Huan

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Manhattan Project: Early Bomb Design, Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Little Boy at Tinian Island, August 1945 EARLY BOMB DESIGN Little Boy at Tinian Island, August 1945 EARLY BOMB DESIGN (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944) Events > Bringing it All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 Early work on the design of the atomic bomb began even as scientists continued to arrive at Los Alamos throughout 1943. The properties of uranium were reasonably well understood, those of plutonium less so, and knowledge of fission explosions entirely theoretical. That 2.2 secondary neutrons were produced when uranium-235 fissioned was accepted, but while Glenn Seaborg's team had proven in March 1941 that plutonium underwent neutron-induced fission, it was not known yet if plutonium released secondary neutrons during bombardment. Further, the exact sizes of the "cross sections" of various fissionable substances had yet to be determined in experiments using the various particle accelerators then being shipped to Los Alamos. The theoretical consensus was that fission Fission chain reaction chain reactions (left) did take place with sufficient speed to produce powerful releases of energy (and not simply result in the explosion of the critical mass itself), but only experiments could test this theory. The optimum size of the critical mass remained to be established, as did the optimum shape. When enough data were gathered to establish optimum critical mass, optimum effective mass still had to be determined. That is, it was not enough simply to start a chain reaction in a critical mass; it was necessary to start one in a mass that would release the greatest possible amount of energy before it was destroyed in the explosion.

133

Manhattan Project: Potsdam and the Final Decision to Use the Bomb, July  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Joseph Stalin, Harry Truman, and Winston Churchill at the Potsdam Conference, July 1945 POTSDAM AND THE FINAL DECISION TO USE THE BOMB Joseph Stalin, Harry Truman, and Winston Churchill at the Potsdam Conference, July 1945 POTSDAM AND THE FINAL DECISION TO USE THE BOMB (Potsdam, Germany, July 1945) Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 The War Enters Its Final Phase, 1945 Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Late Spring 1945 The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 Safety and the Trinity Test, July 1945 Evaluations of Trinity, July 1945 Potsdam and the Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima, August 6, 1945 The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 Japan Surrenders, August 10-15, 1945 The Manhattan Project and the Second World War, 1939-1945 Potsdam, July 19, 1945. Truman wrote a note on the back of the photograph in which he states incorrectly that Stalin did not know about the atomic bomb. After President Harry S. Truman received word of the success of the Trinity test, his need for the help of the Soviet Union in the war against Japan was greatly diminished. The Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin, had promised to join the war against Japan by August 15th. Truman and his advisors now were not sure they wanted this help. If use of the atomic bomb made victory possible without an invasion, then accepting Soviet help would only invite them into the discussions regarding the postwar fate of Japan. During the second week of Allied deliberations at Potsdam, on the evening of July 24, 1945, Truman approached Stalin without an interpreter and, as casually as he could, told him that the United States had a "new weapon of unusual destructive force." Stalin showed little interest, replying only that he hoped the United States would make "good use of it against the Japanese." The reason for Stalin's composure became clear later: Soviet intelligence had been receiving information about the atomic bomb program since fall 1941.

134

Manhattan Project: Final Bomb Design, Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1944-1945  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The first 0.11 seconds of the nuclear age, Trinity, July 16, 1945. FINAL BOMB DESIGN The first 0.11 seconds of the nuclear age, Trinity, July 16, 1945. FINAL BOMB DESIGN (Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1944-1945) Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 Establishing Los Alamos, 1942-1943 Early Bomb Design, 1943-1944 Basic Research at Los Alamos, 1943-1944 Implosion Becomes a Necessity, 1944 Oak Ridge and Hanford Come Through, 1944-1945 Final Bomb Design, 1944-1945 Atomic Rivals and the ALSOS Mission, 1938-1945 Espionage and the Manhattan Project, 1940-1945 American troops approaching the beach, D-Day, June 6, 1944. Late in 1944, Los Alamos began to shift from research to development and bomb production. Increased production at Oak Ridge and Hanford seemed to promise that enough plutonium and enriched uranium would be available for at least one bomb using each. Germany no longer was the intended primary target. The war in Europe (left) appeared to be entering its final phase, and evidence uncovered by the ALSOS mission in November 1944 indicated that the German atomic program had not gone beyond the research phase. Already by summer 1944, Groves and his advisers had turned their sights toward Japan. The atomic bomb would justify the years of effort, including both the vast expenditures and the judgment of everyone responsible, by bringing the war in the Pacific to a fiery end. J. Robert Oppenheimer Ongoing problems continued to complicate the efforts of Robert Oppenheimer (right) to finalize bomb design. Foremost among these were continuing personnel shortages, particularly of physicists, and supply difficulties. The procurement system, designed to protect the secrecy of the Los Alamos project, led to frustrating delays and, when Herb Lehr, SED, holding the Gadget's core, July 1945. combined with persistent late war shortages, proved a constant headache. The lack of contact between the remote laboratory and its supply sources exacerbated the problem, as did the relative lack of experience the academic scientists had with logistical matters. Leslie Groves and James Conant were determined not to let mundane problems compromise the bomb effort, and in fall 1944 they made several changes to prevent this possibility. Conant shipped as many scientists as could be spared from the Met Lab and Oak Ridge to Los Alamos, hired every civilian machinist he could lay his hands on, and arranged for Army enlisted men to supplement the work force (these GIs were known as SEDS ("Special Engineering Detachment"). Hartley Rowe, an experienced industrial engineer, provided help in easing the transition from research to production. Los Alamos also arranged for a rocket research team at the California Institute of Technology to aid in procurement, test fuses, and contribute to component development. These changes kept Los Alamos on track as design work reached its final stages.

135

SOLVING THE "BIG PROBLEMS" Oak Ridge National Laboratory's future could not be more exciting. Not since the days of the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

exciting. Not since the days of the Manhattan Project has the laboratory witnessed anything approaching of the Manhattan Project in 1943, Oak Ridge National Laboratory was established in the dark days of World War II

136

Daylight in Manhattan  

SciTech Connect

Zoning regulations concerned with daylighting in New York City are reviewed extensively going back to the 1916 regulation. Historical developments up to the newly proposed set of zoning regulations for midtown Manhattan are discussed. The importance of the Manhattan regulations, which often serve as a model for other USA cities, are stressed. The daylight performance test, designed to quantify the amount of natural light that will reach the street after a proposed project is constructed, is described. To gain acceptance a new building would have to score at least 85 points (out of 100) on criteria based on daylighting, street wall height, street wall length, and reflectivity. Of these, daylighting is the most important. A modified and simplified two-tiered proposal has been issued with minor changes in scoring the four criteria given above. (MJJ)

Moore, J.A.

1981-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

137

Sandia National Laboratories: About Sandia: History  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

aerodynamic research, 1950s. Sandia National Laboratories' roots lie in World War II's Manhattan Project, which built the world's first atomic bombs. Our history reflects the...

138

''Mini-Manhattan Project'' for Cellulases (Revision)  

SciTech Connect

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is working to make ethanol Americas automotive fuel of the future by domestically producing it from lignocellulosic biomass, the most abundant renewable resource on earth.

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

Manhattan Project: DuPont and Hanford, Hanford Engineer Works, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The president of DuPont, Walter Carpenter, with Generals Levin H. Campbell, Everett Hughes, and Charles T. Harris. DUPONT AND HANFORD The president of DuPont, Walter Carpenter, with Generals Levin H. Campbell, Everett Hughes, and Charles T. Harris. DUPONT AND HANFORD (Hanford Engineer Works, 1942) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 The scientists of the Met Lab had the technical expertise to design a production pile, but construction and management on an industrial scale required an outside contractor. The DuPont Corporation was an ideal candidate, but the giant chemical firm was hesitant to join the project due to concern over accusations that it had profiteered during World War I. On October 3, 1942, DuPont agreed to design and build the chemical separation plant for the production pile facility then planned for Oak Ridge. Leslie Groves tried to entice further DuPont participation by having the firm prepare an appraisal of the pile (reactor) project and by placing three DuPont staff members on the Lewis Committee. DuPont ultimately agreed to become the primary contractor for plutonium-related work, but because of continuing sensitivity about its public image its contract called for a total payment of only dollar over actual costs. In addition, DuPont vowed to stay out of the bomb business after the war and offered all patents to the United States government.

140

Manhattan Project: A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb<!--Include title  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

President Franklin Roosevelt's note to Vannevar Bush giving Bush the tentative go-ahead to build the atomic bomb. A TENTATIVE DECISION TO BUILD THE BOMB President Franklin Roosevelt's note to Vannevar Bush giving Bush the tentative go-ahead to build the atomic bomb. A TENTATIVE DECISION TO BUILD THE BOMB Washington, D.C.(1941-1942) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 Vannevar Bush moved swiftly to take advantage of the positive MAUD Report. Without waiting for Arthur Compton's latest committee to finish its work confirming the MAUD Committee's conclusions, Bush on October 9, 1941, met with President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Vice President Henry A. Wallace (who had been briefed on uranium research in July). Bush summarized the British findings, discussed cost and duration of a bomb project, and emphasized the uncertainty of the situation. He also received the President's permission to explore construction needs with the Army. Roosevelt instructed him to move as quickly as possible but not to go beyond research and development. Bush, then, was to find out if a bomb could be built and at what cost but not to proceed to the production stage without further presidential authorization. Roosevelt indicated that he could find a way to finance the project and asked Bush to draft a letter so that the British government could be approached "at the top.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Nuclear and Radiological Field Training Center | Y-12 National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Field Training Center A site used for nuclear research in Oak Ridge, Tennessee during the Manhattan Project is now the Y-12 National Security Complex's Nuclear and Radiological...

142

A Platinum Anniversary for U.S. Atomic Heritage - EM's Historic Manhattan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A Platinum Anniversary for U.S. Atomic Heritage - EM's Historic A Platinum Anniversary for U.S. Atomic Heritage - EM's Historic Manhattan Project Sites Gain International Media Attention A Platinum Anniversary for U.S. Atomic Heritage - EM's Historic Manhattan Project Sites Gain International Media Attention September 1, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - Traditionally, a platinum anniversary marks 70-years. The Manhattan roject legacy reached that special milestone this summer, highlighting a remarkable history nvolving the Oak Ridge and Hanford sites and Los Alamos National Laboratory. Bipartisan legislation making its way through Congress could commemorate America's atomic history by turning these sites into a national park, a prospect that continues to gain national and international media attention in print, online and on TV and

143

Oak Ridge National Laboratory 5-1 5. Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of the secret Manhattan Project to pioneer a method for producing and separating plutonium. During the 1950s, but very different from, the work carried out in the days of the Manhattan Project. ORNL, and national security. ORNL's leadership role in the nation's energy future includes hosting the U.S. project

Pennycook, Steve

144

Manhattan Project: Resources  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

page is original to the Department of Energy's Office of History and Heritage Resources. Home | History Office | OpenNet | DOE | Privacy and Security Notices About this Site | How...

145

Manhattan Project: Blast  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Blast (Animation) Blast (Animation) Yucca Flat, Nevada (March 17, 1953) Resources > Photo Gallery Blast Animation The eight images above are a sequence of photographs of a house constructed 3,500 feet from "ground zero" at the Nevada Test Site being destroyed by the Annie test shot. The only source of light was the blast itself, detonated on March 17, 1953. The final image is two-and-one-third seconds after detonation. In the second image the house is actually on fire, but in the third image the fire has already been blown out by the blast. Annie, part of the "Upshot-Knothole" test series, had a yield of 16 kilotons, roughly the same size as the Trinity, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki explosions. Two photographs of the Annie mushroom cloud are at the bottom of this page.

146

Manhattan Project: Photo Gallery  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer PHOTO GALLERY Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer PHOTO GALLERY Resources Additional information is available regarding the following "animated gifs" and other photographs: Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Berkeley Meeting The "Big House" Blast (Animation) Events Images First Atomic Energy Commissioners Fuller Lodge F Reactor Plutonium Production Complex Hiroshima Images Image Retouching Kasparov, Kamen, and Kheifits Los Alamos Scientists Los Alamos Street Scene "Met Lab" Alumni Nagasaki Images Nixon and the Atomic Pioneers People Images Places Images Potsdam Note "Rad Lab" Staff S-1 Committee San Ildefonso Pueblo Party Science Images Solvay Physics Conference Tech Area Gallery (Large) Tech Area Gallery (Small) Trinity Images Trinity (Color Photograph)

147

Manhattan Project: Ed Westcott  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

ED WESTCOTT Oak Ridge (Clinton Engineer Works) (1945) Resources > Photo Gallery Ed Westcott Ed Westcott, Army Corps of Engineers photographer, 1945. This photograph is courtesy Oak...

148

Manhattan Project: Hiroshima  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HIROSHIMA IMAGES Hiroshima, Japan (August 1945) Resources > Photo Gallery Aerial photographs of the city of Hiroshima before (April 13, 1945) and after (August 11, 1945) the...

149

Manhattan Project: Enrico Fermi  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Enrico Fermi Events > Bringing it All Together, 1942-1945 > Basic Research at Los Alamos, Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944 Enrico Fermi...

150

Manhattan Project: Uranium cubes  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Cubes of uranium metal, Los Alamos, 1945 Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 > More Uranium Research, 1942 Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 > Basic Research at Los Alamos,...

151

Manhattan Project: Enrico Fermi  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Enrico Fermi Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 > Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 > CP-1 Goes Critical, Met Lab,...

152

Manhattan Project: Hans Bethe  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Hans Bethe Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 > Basic Research at Los Alamos, Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944 People > Scientists > Hans Bethe Hans Bethe...

153

Special Resource Study/Environmental Assessment for Manhattan...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Special Resource StudyEnvironmental Assessment for Manhattan Project Sites, DOEEA-1868 (September 2010) Special Resource StudyEnvironmental...

154

National Teacher Enhancement Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

funded by the National Science Foundation and the funded by the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science and offered at 10 DOE National Laboratories NTEP Projects Learning to Live in a Risky World Lewis and Clark in Washington The Seed Connection SIMply Prairie Home Energy Audit Weather Watchers Project Background . . . but where's the class? Doing Research - Publishing Results Created for the NTEP II Fermilab LInC program sponsored by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Education Office and Friends of Fermilab, and funded by United States Department of Energy, Illinois State Board of Education, North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium which is operated by North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), and the National Science Foundation. Web Maintainer: ed-webmaster@fnal.gov

155

National Uranium Resource Evaluation Program. Hydrogeochemical and stream sediment reconnaissance basic data for Manhattan NTMS Quadrangle, Kansas  

SciTech Connect

Results of a reconnaissance geochemical survey of the Manhattan Quadrangle, Kansas, are reported. Field and laboratory data are presented for 674 groundwater and 718 stream sediment samples. Statistical and areal distributions of uranium and possible uranium-related variables are displayed. A generalized geologic map of the survey area is provided, and pertinent geologic factors which may be of significance in evaluating the potential for uranium mineralization are briefly discussed. The groundwater data indicate that the most promising area for potential uranium mineralization occurs in the western-northwestern part of the quadrangle where waters are produced from the Quaternary loess deposits, and the Cretaceous Greenhorn-Graneros and Dakota Formations. Associated elements in the quadrangle include arsenic, potassium, manganese, vanadium, and selenium. The stream sediment data indicate that the highest average uranium concentrations in sediments from the Manhattan Quadrangle are obtained from the Pennsylvanian Wabaunsee Group followed by the Cretaceous Carlile Shale, Greenhorn-Graneros and Dakota Formations. In the northwestern corner of the quadrangle, high concentrations of uranium are associated with high concentrations of barium, niobium, strontium, titanium, vanadium, yttrium, and zirconium. In southeast Cloud County and extending to the northeast, high values of total uranium are associated with high values of titanium, yttrium, zirconium, and low U-FL/U-NT values. These associations indicate that the uranium is probably present in heavy and/or resistate minerals.

1979-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

156

Manhattan --3D City Visualizations in Eclipse Alberto Bacchelli, Francesco Rigotti, Lile Hattori, and Michele Lanza  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

tools already in use. We present Manhattan, an Eclipse plugin that visualizes projects in the workspace in isolation: When other developers modify the same project in their Eclipse instance, Manhattan visualizes of the activity of the team. Manhattan visualizes projects in the Eclipse workspace by using the 3D city metaphor

Lanza, Michele

157

Curriculum connections: science, technology, ethics, Manhattan Project and the Cold War, military tactics and strategy, World War II and H-Bomb, radiation and its effects, terrorism, international arms  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb (DVD) On Order The Manhattan Project and the Cold War, military tactics and strategy, World War II and H-Bomb, radiation16.E5 S3285 2008 J. Robert Oppenheimer, the Cold War, and the Atomic

Rose, Annkatrin

158

Gasification Systems Projects National Map  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Gasification Systems Gasification Systems Projects National Map Click on a number to go to the project page. Hybrid Solar Coal Gasifier ITM Oxygen Technology for Integration in...

159

THE NATIONAL BASIN DELINEATION PROJECT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The National Basin Delineation Project (NBDP) was undertaken by the National Severe Storms Laboratory to define flash-flood-scale basin boundaries for the country in support of the National Weather Service (NWS) Flash Flood Monitoring and ...

Ami T. Arthur; Gina M. Cox; Nathan R. Kuhnert; David L. Slayter; Kenneth W. Howard

2005-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

Pulling History from the Waste Stream: Identification and Collection of Manhattan Project and Cold War Era Artifacts on the Hanford Site  

SciTech Connect

One man?s trash is another man?s treasure. Not everything called ?waste? is meant for the refuse pile. The mission of the Curation Program is at direct odds with the remediation objectives of the Hanford Site. While others are busily tearing down and burying the Site?s physical structures and their associated contents, the Curation Program seeks to preserve the tangible elements of the Site?s history from these structures for future generations before they flow into the waste stream. Under the provisions of a Programmatic Agreement, Cultural Resources staff initiated a project to identify and collect artifacts and archives that have historic or interpretive value in documenting the role of the Hanford Site throughout the Manhattan Project and Cold War Era. The genesis of Hanford?s modern day Curation Program, its evolution over nearly two decades, issues encountered, and lessons learned along the way ? particularly the importance of upper management advocacy, when and how identification efforts should be accomplished, the challenges of working within a radiological setting, and the importance of ?first hand? information ? are presented.

Marceau, Thomas E.; Watson, Thomas L.

2013-11-13T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Annual Report | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

a symbol of national strength and global security for 70 years. Originally part of the Manhattan Project, Y-12 was constructed to enrich uranium for an atomic weapon to end...

162

Y-12's historian receives 2013 Muddy Boot Award | Y-12 National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

who have gone above the call of duty - like those who served the nation during the Manhattan Project - to make the community, the state of Tennessee and the nation a better...

163

Manhattan Project: Difficult Choices, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

"Met Lab" alumni at the University of Chicago -- Fermi is on the far left of the front row; Zinn is on Fermi's left; Anderson is on the far right of the front row; and Szilard is over Anderson's right shoulder. DIFFICULT CHOICES "Met Lab" alumni at the University of Chicago -- Fermi is on the far left of the front row; Zinn is on Fermi's left; Anderson is on the far right of the front row; and Szilard is over Anderson's right shoulder. DIFFICULT CHOICES (1942) Events More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 By early 1942, as the United States suffered a series of military defeats in the Pacific, top officials in Washington tentatively had decided to proceed with the construction of an atomic bomb. Two paths seemed possible. A uranium bomb could be achieved if sufficient uranium-235 could be produced by one or more of the three isotope separation methods under consideration: gaseous diffusion, centrifuge, and electromagnetic. A plutonium bomb might provide a quicker route, but it required demonstration that plutonium could be produced in a uranium pile and then be separated in usable quantities. To this end, Arthur Compton consolidated most plutonium research at the new Metallurgical Laboratory (Met Lab) at the University of Chicago.

164

Manhattan Project: Einstein's Letter, 1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 EINSTEIN'S LETTER Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 EINSTEIN'S LETTER (1939) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 On October 11, 1939, Alexander Sachs, Wall Street economist and longtime friend and unofficial advisor to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, met with the President to discuss a letter written by Albert Einstein the previous August (right). Einstein had written to inform Roosevelt that recent research on fission chain reactions utilizing uranium made it probable that large amounts of power could be produced by a chain reaction and that, by harnessing this power, the construction of "extremely powerful bombs" was conceivable. Einstein believed the German government was actively supporting research in this area and urged the United States government to do likewise. Sachs read from a cover letter he had prepared and briefed Roosevelt on the main points contained in Einstein's letter. Initially the President was noncommittal and expressed concern over locating the necessary funds, but at a second meeting over breakfast the next morning Roosevelt became convinced of the value of exploring atomic energy.

165

Manhattan Project: CP-1 Construction  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

CP-1 construction, November 24, 1942. Visible are portions of layers 27, 28, and 29. The Goodyear balloon is visible in the background. Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 > More...

166

Manhattan Project: CP-1 Drawing  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Drawing of CP-1 Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 > Picking Horses, November 1942 Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 > Production Reactor (Pile) Design, Met Lab,...

167

Manufacturing Fuel Cell Manhattan Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

100 and 500 watts of power. Are significantly quieter than a generator - a critical asset, especially for silent watch operations Support the greater use of rechargeable...

168

Manhattan Project: Emilio Segr, 1954  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Emilio Segr, 1954 Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 > Basic Research at Los Alamos, Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944 Emilio Segr, 1954...

169

Manhattan Project: J. Robert Oppenheimer  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

J. Robert Oppenheimer Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 > Y-12 Construction, Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1943 Events > Bringing It All Together, 1942-1945 > Basic Research...

170

Manhattan Project: Fast Neutron Experiment  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

An experiment to determine the cross section of uranium-235 for fast neutrons. The target is the small pile of cubes of uranium hydride. The uranium target is surrounded by larger...

171

Manhattan Project: Harry S. Truman  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Harry S. Truman, November 1945 Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 > Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Washington, D.C., Late Spring 1945 Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 >...

172

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

April through June 2008 update on activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project.

Not Available

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

Seversk Plutonium Production Elimination Project (SPPEP) | National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Seversk Plutonium Production Elimination Project (SPPEP) | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear...

174

BWXTymes, A newsletter for employees and friends of Y-12 National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from a calutron that was built during the Manhattan Project to create the atomic bomb that ended World War II. Y-12 is a major resource that has had regional, national and...

175

Opportunistic infrastructure : the Trans-Manhattan Expressway  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Urban Infrastructure: bridges, expressways, and on and off ramps often create barriers and uninhabitable spaces within the urban context. This phenomenon is evident in northern Manhattan where the Trans-Manhattan Expressway ...

O'Koren, Jason F

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

Revised version 1 THE STRATEGY OF PARALLEL APPROACHES IN PROJECTS WITH UNFORESEEABLE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

: THE MANHATTAN CASE IN RETROSPECT. Sylvain Lenfle Published in the International Journal of Project Management becomes available. Studying the case of the Manhattan Project, which historically exemplifies the power: Project Management, Parallel Approach, Combination, Unforeseeable uncertainty, Innovation, Manhattan

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

177

EA-1933: Yakama Nation Drop 4 Hydropower Project, Yakama Nation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

933: Yakama Nation Drop 4 Hydropower Project, Yakama Nation 933: Yakama Nation Drop 4 Hydropower Project, Yakama Nation Reservation, WA EA-1933: Yakama Nation Drop 4 Hydropower Project, Yakama Nation Reservation, WA SUMMARY DOE is a cooperating agency with the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Indian Affairs as a lead agency for the preparation of an EA to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of a proposal by the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation Department of Natural Resources to install an inline turbine on the Wapato Irrigation Project (WIP) Main Canal to generate approximately one megawatt of supplemental hydroelectric power. The Main Canal is a non-fish bearing irrigation canal within the WIP water conveyance system. The project site is located two miles southwest of Harrah, Washington.

178

Ocean Odysseys: Jack O'Neill, Dan Haifley, and the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

we did with the Manhattan Project, we can make a difference.won that war. The Manhattan Project happened, not quickly,

O'Neill, Jack; Haifley, Dan; Reti, Irene; Regional History Project, UCSC Library

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

Sandia National Labs: PCNSC: News: Featured Projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Projects The Physical, Chemical, and Nano Sciences Center provides science-based solutions for the mission needs of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), as well as...

180

Luxury condos : an analysis of sales price and hotel amenities in Manhattan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The purpose of this research project is to examine the market pricing behavior of condos with hotel amenities in the Manhattan condo market. To do this, data was compiled from multiple sources to track variations in price ...

Dolan, Amelia Jane

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project | National Nuclear  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project | National Nuclear Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Carolyn Zerkle Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project Carolyn Zerkle Carolyn Zerkle Role: Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project

182

Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project | National Nuclear Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Carolyn Zerkle Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project Carolyn Zerkle Carolyn Zerkle Role: Leader, Los Alamos National Laboratory Stimulus Project

183

Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project October 22, 2012 - 3:44pm Addthis Crow Nation...

184

Advanced Metrology for Nanoelectronics at the National ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Critical Dimension and Overlay Projects Precision Engineering Division ... (projected availability April 2007) Page 12. ... Nano-Manhattan? Page 13. ...

185

Superior National Forest Project/Campaign Document  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Superior National Forest Project/Campaign Document Superior National Forest Project/Campaign Document Summary: This project was an intensive remote sensing and field study of the boreal forest in the Superior National Forest (SNF). The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the ability of remote-sensing data to provide estimates of biophysical properties of ecosystems, such as leaf area index (LAI), biomass, and net primary productivity (NPP). The SNF is mostly covered by boreal forest. Boreal forests were chosen for this project because of their relative taxonomic simplicity, their great extent, and their potential sensitivity to climatic change. Information on the SNF project is available by accessing the SNF pages maintained by the ORNL DAAC at http://daac.ornl.govSNF/summary.html. Table of Contents:

186

DEMO Project Goals | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

DEMO Project Goals | National Nuclear Security Administration DEMO Project Goals | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog DEMO Project Goals Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Human Resources > Pay-banding > DEMO Project Goals DEMO Project Goals The goals of this demonstration project are to Improve hiring by allowing NNSA to compete more effectively for high

187

Brookhaven National Laboratory solar projects  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Four solar projects at BNL are briefly described: (1) the development of a hardware simulator for testing of solar cooling/heating subsystems and systems; (2) testing of a solar assisted heat pump; (3) simulation of a series heat pump system with air-heating collector and water source heat pump using the TRNSYS computer program; and (4) an experimental facility to study the potential for ground energy coupling in the series solar heat pump systems. (WHK)

Andrews, J; Auh, P; Kush, E; Lewansdoski, A; Metz, P

1978-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

188

FCT Hydrogen Storage: The 'National Hydrogen Storage Project...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The 'National Hydrogen Storage Project' to someone by E-mail Share FCT Hydrogen Storage: The 'National Hydrogen Storage Project' on Facebook Tweet about FCT Hydrogen Storage: The...

189

National Ignition Facility project acquisition plan  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this National Ignition Facility Acquisition Plan is to describe the overall procurement strategy planned for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) Project. The scope of the plan describes the procurement activities and acquisition strategy for the following phases of the NIF Project, each of which receives either plant and capital equipment (PACE) or other project cost (OPC) funds: Title 1 and 2 design and Title 3 engineering (PACE); Optics manufacturing facilitization and pilot production (OPC); Convention facility construction (PACE); Procurement, installation, and acceptance testing of equipment (PACE); and Start-up (OPC). Activities that are part of the base Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Program are not included in this plan. The University of California (UC), operating Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Lockheed-Martin, which operates Sandia National Laboratory (SNL) and the University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics (UR-LLE), will conduct the acquisition of needed products and services in support of their assigned responsibilities within the NIF Project structure in accordance with their prime contracts with the Department of Energy (DOE). LLNL, designated as the lead Laboratory, will have responsibility for all procurements required for construction, installation, activation, and startup of the NIF.

Callaghan, R.W.

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

190

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME PROJECT DOCUMENT SUMMARY  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME PROJECT DOCUMENT SUMMARY 1.1 Title of Sub-Programme: Climate Change 1.2 Title of Project: Solar and Wind Energy Resource Assessment 1.3 Project number: GF/ 1.4 Geographical Scope: Global (10) 1.5 Implementation: Internal DTIE with 20 supporting agencies 1.6 Duration of the Project: 36 months Commencing: June 2001 Completion: July 2004 1.7 Cost of Project: (Expressed in thousands of US dollars, excluding PDF grant) 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total % GEF Trust Fund 1,430 1,742 1,613 1,013 6,512 73 Collaborating Agencies (in kind) 418 836 836 418 2,508 28 3,849 4,580 4,452 3,435 9,020 100 1.8 Project Summary This project will provide solar and wind resource data and geographic information assessment tools to public and private sector executives who are involved in energy market development. It

191

Manhattan Project: More Piles and Plutonium, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

"Met Lab" alumni at the University of Chicago -- Fermi is on the far left of the front row; Zinn is on Fermi's left; Anderson is on the far right of the front row; and Szilard is over Anderson's right shoulder. MORE PILES AND PLUTONIUM "Met Lab" alumni at the University of Chicago -- Fermi is on the far left of the front row; Zinn is on Fermi's left; Anderson is on the far right of the front row; and Szilard is over Anderson's right shoulder. MORE PILES AND PLUTONIUM (1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 At the University of Chicago, meanwhile, Arthur Compton had consolidated most fission research at his new Metallurgical Laboratory(Met Lab). Compton decided to combine all pile research by stages. He continued to fund Enrico Fermi's pile research at Columbia University, while Fermi began preparations to move his work to Chicago. Funding continued as well for the theoretical work of Eugene Wigner at Princeton and of J. Robert Oppenheimer at the University of California, Berkeley. Compton also appointed Leo Szilard head of materials acquisition and arranged for Glenn T. Seaborg to move his plutonium work from Berkeley to Chicago in April 1942.

192

Manhattan Project: Fission Comes to America, 1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. FISSION COMES TO AMERICA Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. FISSION COMES TO AMERICA (1939) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 News of the fission experiments of Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann, and of the Meitner-Frisch calculations that confirmed them, spread rapidly. Meitner and Frisch communicated their results to Niels Bohr, who was in Copenhagen preparing to depart for the United States via Sweden and England. Bohr confirmed the validity of the findings while sailing to New York City, arriving on January 16, 1939. Ten days later Bohr, accompanied by Enrico Fermi, communicated the latest developments to some European émigré scientists who had preceded him to this country and to members of the American scientific community at the opening session of a conference on theoretical physics in Washington, D.C.

193

Manhattan Project: Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Solvay Physics Conference, Brussels, October 1933 ATOMIC BOMBARDMENT Solvay Physics Conference, Brussels, October 1933 ATOMIC BOMBARDMENT (1932-1938) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 M. Stanley Livingston and Ernest O. Lawrence in front of a 27-inch cyclotron, Rad Lab, University of California, Berkeley, 1934. In the 1930s, scientists learned a tremendous amount about the structure of the atom by bombarding it with sub-atomic particles. Ernest O. Lawrence's cyclotron, the Cockroft-Walton machine, and the Van de Graaff generator, developed by Robert J. Van de Graaff at Princeton University, were particle accelerators designed to bombard the nuclei of various elements to disintegrate atoms. Attempts of the early 1930s to split atoms, however, required huge amounts of energy because the first accelerators used proton beams and alpha particles as sources of energy. Since protons and alpha particles are positively charged, they Albert Einstein met substantial resistance from the positively charged target nucleus when they attempted to penetrate atoms. Even high-speed protons and alpha particles scored direct hits on a nucleus only approximately once in a million tries. Most simply passed by the target nucleus. Not surprisingly, Ernest Rutherford, Albert Einstein (right), and Niels Bohr regarded particle bombardment as useful in furthering knowledge of nuclear physics but believed it unlikely to meet public expectations of harnessing the power of the atom for practical purposes anytime in the near future. In a 1933 interview, Rutherford called such expectations "moonshine." Einstein compared particle bombardment with shooting in the dark at scarce birds, while Bohr, the Danish Nobel laureate, agreed that the chances of taming atomic energy were remote.

194

Manhattan Project: Enter the Army, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Army parade, Los Alamos ENTER THE ARMY Army parade, Los Alamos ENTER THE ARMY (1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 The decision to proceed with planning for the production of enriched uranium and of plutonium led directly to the involvement of the Army, specifically the Corps of Engineers. President Roosevelt had approved Army involvement on October 9, 1941, and Vannevar Bush had arranged for Army participation at S-1 meetings beginning in March 1942. The need for security suggested placing the S-1 program within one of the armed forces, and the construction expertise of the Corps of Engineers made it the logical choice to build the production facilities envisioned in the Conant report of May 23.

195

Manhattan Project: William S. "Deke" Parsons  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Alamos, Los Alamos: Laboratory, 1943-1944 Places > Other Places > Bomb Casing and Drop Test Sites Places > Los Alamos: The Laboratory > S-Site Implosion Facility William S. "Deke"...

196

Manhattan Project: First Atomic Energy Commissioners  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested...

197

The Manhattan Project: Making the atomic bomb  

SciTech Connect

This article is a short history of the origins and development of the American atomic bomb program during World War II. Beginning with the scientific developments of the pre-war years, the monograph details the role of US government in conducting a secret, nationwide enterprise that took science from the laboratory and into combat with an entirely new type of weapon. The monograph concludes with a discussion of the immediate postwar period, the debate over the Atomic Energy Act of 1946, and the founding of the Atomic Energy Commission.

Gosling, F.G.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

Manhattan Project: CP-1 Chianti Bottle  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The Chianti used to celebrate CP-1 going critical. Some of the signatures are visible on the label. Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 > CP-1 Goes Critical, Met...

199

Manhattan Project: CP-1 Going Critical  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Painting of CP-1 Going Critical Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 > CP-1 Goes Critical, Met Lab, December 2,...

200

Events leading to the Manhattan Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

be valuable to Germany's efforts to create a fission weapon. Norway then gave the entire stock of heavy water to a French Secret Service agent who smuggled it through England to...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Manhattan Project: Los Alamos Street Scene  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

LOS ALAMOS STREET SCENE LOS ALAMOS STREET SCENE Los Alamos (The Town) Resources > Photo Gallery Los Alamos street scene. Fuller Lodge and the "Big House" are visible in the distance (see below). Above is a view of Los Alamos (looking north). In the distance, Fuller Lodge and the "Big House" are visible to the left and right, respectively (see below). The photograph is reproduced from Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos: Beginning of an Era, 1943-1945 (Los Alamos: Public Relations Office, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, ca. 1967-1971), 13. The labels and "close-ups" below were made by the Office of History and Heritage Resources. Los Alamos street scene (labeled) Close-up of Fuller Lodge Close-up of the "Big House" Click on a link below to return to:

202

Manhattan Project: Einstein's Letter to Roosevelt  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

EINSTEIN'S LETTER TO ROOSEVELT Albert Einstein (with Leo Szilard) to President Franklin Roosevelt, August 2, 1939 Resources > Library Below are photographs of both pages of the letter written by Albert Einstein, with the help of Leo Szilard, to President Franklin Roosevelt on August 2, 1939, warning Roosevelt of the dangers posed by nuclear energy. Click here for more background on the writing of this letter. The photographs of the pages themselves are courtesy the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum. First page of Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939. Second page of Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, August 2, 1939. Click on a link below to return to Einstein's Letter, 1939 Albert Einstein Library Sources and notes for this page.

203

Manhattan Project: Y-12 Construction, 1943  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Groundbreaking for Y-12, Oak Ridge Y-12: CONSTRUCTION Groundbreaking for Y-12, Oak Ridge Y-12: CONSTRUCTION (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1943) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 Groundbreaking for the Alpha plant of the Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant took place at Oak Ridge on February 18, 1943 (right). Soon blueprints could not be produced fast enough to keep up with construction as Stone & Webster labored to meet Leslie Groves's deadline. The Beta facility was actually begun before formal authorization. While laborers were aggressively recruited, there was always a shortage of workers skilled Y-12 construction, Oak Ridge enough to perform jobs according to the rigid specifications. (A further complication was that some tasks could be performed only by workers with security clearances.) Huge amounts of material had to be obtained (38 million board feet of lumber, for instance), and the magnets needed so much copper for windings that the Army had to borrow almost 15,000 tons of silver bullion from the United States Treasury to fabricate into strips and wind on to coils as a substitute for copper. Treasury silver was also used to manufacture the busbars that ran around the top of the racetracks.

204

Manhattan Project: Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. ATOMIC DISCOVERIES Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. ATOMIC DISCOVERIES (1890s-1939) Events A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 Philosophers of Ancient Greece reasoned that all matter in the universe must be composed of fundamental, unchangeable, and indivisible objects, which they called "atoma" ("ατoµα"). The exact nature of these atoms remained elusive, however, despite centuries of attempts by alchemists to create a "philosopher's stone" that could transmute atoms of lead to gold, prove the Greeks wrong, and make its inventors Modern model of an atom very rich. It was only in the late 1890s and the early twentieth-century that this view of a solid atom, bouncing around the universe like a billiard ball, was replaced by an atom that resembled more a miniature solar system, its electrons orbiting around a small nucleus. Explorations into the nature of the atom from 1919 to 1932 confirmed this new model, especially with Ernest Rutherford's 1919 success in finally transmuting an atom of one substance into another and with James Chadwick's 1932 discovery of the elusive final basic particle of the atom, the neutron. From 1932 to 1938, scientists around the world learned a great deal more about atoms, primarily by bombarding the nuclei of atoms and using a variety of particle accelerators. In 1938, word came from Berlin of the most startling result of them all: the nucleus of an atom could actually be split in two, or "fissioned." This breakthrough was quickly confirmed in the United States and elsewhere. According to the theories of Albert Einstein, the fission of an atom should result in a release of energy. An "atomic bomb" was now no longer just science fiction -- it was a distinct possibility.

205

Manhattan Project: K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 > Working K-25 into the Mix, Oak Ridge:...

206

Manhattan Project: Army parade, Los Alamos  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Army parade, Los Alamos Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 > Enter the Army, 1942 People > Military Organizations > Army Corps of Engineers Army parade, Los Alamos...

207

Manhattan Project: President Franklin D. Roosevelt  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

President Franklin D. Roosevelt Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 > Einstein's Letter, 1939 People > Administrators > Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United...

208

Coupled Site Characterization and Foundation Analysis Research Project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Analysis Research Project: Rational Selection of for Drained-Strength Bearing Capacity Analysis Manhattan Research Project: Rational Selection of for Drained-Strength Bearing Capacity Analysis Manhattan CollegeCoupled Site Characterization and Foundation Analysis Research Project: Rational Selection

Horvath, John S.

209

Oak Ridge National Laboratory 5-1 5. Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

of the secret Manhattan Project to pioneer a method for producing and separating plutonium. During the 1950s, but very different from, the work carried out in the days of the Manhattan Project. #12;Oak Ridge

Pennycook, Steve

210

Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at Commercial-Scale Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at Commercial-Scale July 31, 2013 - 1:37pm Addthis...

211

Integrating Ecological Data: Notes from the Grasslands ANPP Data Integration Project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Integrating Ecological Data: Notes from the Grasslands ANPP Data Integration Project Judith B, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, 7 South African National Parks, Scientific Services across sites. The Grasslands ANPP Data Integration (GDI) project has brought together experts in ecology

212

National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... as important along with projected costs for ... A demonstration project would help determine where ... Financial District and Midtown Manhattan and the ...

2011-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

213

National Biomedical Tracer Facility: Project definition study  

SciTech Connect

The Los Alamos National Laboratory is an ideal institution and New Mexico is an ideal location for siting the National Biomedical Tracer Facility (NBTF). The essence of the Los Alamos proposal is the development of two complementary irradiation facilities that combined with our existing radiochemical processing hot cell facilities and waste handling and disposal facilities provide a low cost alternative to other proposals that seek to satisfy the objectives of the NBTF. We propose the construction of a 30 MeV cyclotron facility at the site of the radiochemical facilities, and the construction of a 100 MeV target station at LAMPF to satisfy the requirements and objectives of the NBTF. We do not require any modifications to our existing radiochemical processing hot cell facilities or our waste treatment and disposal facilities to accomplish the objectives of the NBTF. The total capital cost for the facility defined by the project definition study is $15.2 M. This cost estimate includes $9.9 M for the cyclotron and associated facility, $2.0 M for the 100 MeV target station at LAMPF, and $3.3 M for design.

Heaton, R.; Peterson, E. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States); Smith, P. [Smith (P.A.) Concepts and Designs (United States)

1995-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

214

Manhattan, Kansas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Manhattan, Kansas: Energy Resources Manhattan, Kansas: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 39.1836082°, -96.5716694° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":39.1836082,"lon":-96.5716694,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

215

SAVANNAH RIVER NATIONAL LABORATORYREGENERATIVE FUEL CELL PROJECT  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A team comprised of governmental, academic and industrial partners led by the Savannah River National Laboratory developed and demonstrated a regenerative fuel cell system for backup power applications. Recent market assessments have identified emergency response and telecommunication applications as promising near-term markets for fuel cell backup power systems. The Regenerative Fuel Cell System (RFC) consisted of a 2 kg-per-day electrolyzer, metal-hydride based hydrogen storage units and a 5 kW fuel cell. Coupling these components together created a system that can produce and store its own energy from the power grid much like a rechargeable battery. A series of test were conducted to evaluate the performance of the RFC system under both steady-state and transit conditions that might be encountered in typical backup power applications. In almost all cases the RFC functioned effectively. Test results from the demonstration project will be used to support recommendations for future fuel cell and hydrogen component and system designs and support potential commercialization activities. In addition to the work presented in this report, further testing of the RFC system at the Center for Hydrogen Research in Aiken County, SC is planned including evaluating the system as a renewable system coupled with a 20kW-peak solar photovoltaic array.

Motyka, T

2008-11-11T23:59:59.000Z

216

Project Management and Systems Support | National Nuclear Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Management and Systems Support | National Nuclear Security Project Management and Systems Support | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Project Management and Systems Support Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Project Management and Systems Support Project Management and Systems Support Goal

217

Project Management and Systems Support | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Project Management and Systems Support | National Nuclear Security Project Management and Systems Support | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Project Management and Systems Support Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Project Management and Systems Support Project Management and Systems Support Goal

218

Ferry Barge | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ferry Barge Ferry Barge Before the Manhattan Project, modern bridges were very far into the future for the Oak Ridge area. They came more quickly with the project....

219

Fast Physics Project, Brookhaven National Laboratory, BNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

User Forum Report Problems FAQ Contact Us Other Links Can't View PDFs? FASTER (FAst-physics System TEstbed and Research) Project Brookhaven Climate Consortium The FASTER project...

220

Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project October 22, 2012 - 3:44pm Addthis Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project Thanks in part to DOE funding and technical support, student interns from the Crow Tribe in Montana had the opportunity to participate in an algae biomass research project that could help prepare them for cleantech jobs and pave the way for their Tribe to produce clean, renewable energy. The Cultivation and Characterization of Oil Producing Algae Internship placed students in a laboratory alongside established researchers to study local algae samples and evaluate their possible use in energy applications. The project focused on an integrated coal-to-liquid (ICTL) technology

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project October 22, 2012 - 3:44pm Addthis Crow Nation Students Participate in Algae Biomass Research Project Thanks in part to DOE funding and technical support, student interns from the Crow Tribe in Montana had the opportunity to participate in an algae biomass research project that could help prepare them for cleantech jobs and pave the way for their Tribe to produce clean, renewable energy. The Cultivation and Characterization of Oil Producing Algae Internship placed students in a laboratory alongside established researchers to study local algae samples and evaluate their possible use in energy applications. The project focused on an integrated coal-to-liquid (ICTL) technology

222

EMP: Earth Microbiome Project | Argonne National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EMP: Earth Microbiome Project EMP: Earth Microbiome Project EMP: Earth Microbiome Project The Earth Microbiome Project is a proposed massively multidisciplinary effort to analyze microbial communities across the globe. The general premise is to examine microbial communities from their own perspective. We propose to characterize the Earth by environmental parameter space into different biomes and then explore these using samples currently available from researchers across the globe. We will analyze 200,000 samples from these communities using metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and amplicon sequencing to produce a global Gene Atlas describing protein space, environmental metabolic models for each biome, approximately 500,000 reconstructed microbial genomes, a global metabolic model, and a

223

CRAD, Training - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRU ALPHA LLWT TRU ALPHA LLWT Project CRAD, Training - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project November 2003 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Training Program portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Training - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project More Documents & Publications CRAD, Quality Assurance - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project

224

Two Savannah River Site Projects Gain National Recognition | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Two Savannah River Site Projects Gain National Recognition Two Savannah River Site Projects Gain National Recognition Two Savannah River Site Projects Gain National Recognition June 21, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Jim Giusti, DOE (803) 952-7697 james-r.giusti@srs.gov Will Callicott, SRNL (803) 725-3786 will.callicott@srs.gov AIKEN, SC - The Department of Energy's Savannah River Site has received Environmental Sustainability (EStar) awards from DOE for two projects growing out of technology research, development and application at the Savannah River National Laboratory. EStar awards recognize excellence in pollution prevention and sustainable environmental stewardship. They are awarded for projects and programs that reduce environmental impacts, enhance site operations, and reduce costs. One award, for Renewable Technology Development, Deployment and Education

225

DOE Collaboration with National Geographic's JASON Project Yields Three  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Collaboration with National Geographic's JASON Project Yields Collaboration with National Geographic's JASON Project Yields Three CODiE Awards DOE Collaboration with National Geographic's JASON Project Yields Three CODiE Awards July 28, 2010 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - The JASON Project's multimedia energy curriculum has earned three CODiE Awards from the Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA). Developed with assistance from the Office of Fossil Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Operation: Infinite Potential explores past, current, and future challenges of energy generation, storage, and consumption. NETL was one of four host sites used in developing the JASON Project's energy curriculum Operation: Infinite Potential. Visiting students learned about energy challenges and conducted research alongside NETL scientists.

226

Two Savannah River Site Projects Gain National Recognition | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savannah River Site Projects Gain National Recognition Savannah River Site Projects Gain National Recognition Two Savannah River Site Projects Gain National Recognition June 21, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Jim Giusti, DOE (803) 952-7697 james-r.giusti@srs.gov Will Callicott, SRNL (803) 725-3786 will.callicott@srs.gov AIKEN, SC - The Department of Energy's Savannah River Site has received Environmental Sustainability (EStar) awards from DOE for two projects growing out of technology research, development and application at the Savannah River National Laboratory. EStar awards recognize excellence in pollution prevention and sustainable environmental stewardship. They are awarded for projects and programs that reduce environmental impacts, enhance site operations, and reduce costs. One award, for Renewable Technology Development, Deployment and Education

227

Clean Cities National Parks Initiative Project Success Story Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Parks Initiative Project Success Story Form National Parks Initiative Project Success Story Form Do you know about a successful petroleum-reduction activity or clean-transportation project that should be featured with the National Parks Initiative projects? In addition to being on the Clean Cities website, these success stories can be featured in U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Interior publications and in videos with potential national television coverage. These success stories should be related to alternative fuels, advanced vehicle technologies, and smart driving practices, and they must be projects at NPS units. To submit a success story idea, complete the form below and click the "Submit by E-Mail" button in the upper-right corner of this page or save the form and e-mail it to andrew.hudgins@nrel.gov.

228

Operational results of National Solar Demonstration Projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Included in the National Solar Demonstration Program are examples of earth-sheltered, passive solar designs. The data obtained from these sites presents an interesting look at what is both technically and economically feasible. Data from four demonstration sites that are members of the National Solar Data Network are utilized to present an economic and technical analyses of a group of four sites. Three of these sites are earth sheltered residential structures, the fourth is a commercial passive structure. This sample of four demonstration sites is not intended to provide a statistical representation of passive earth sheltered structures, but rather, an example of the type of information available through the National Solar Data Program and how this information may be utilized.

Waite, E.V.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

229

Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at Commercial-Scale Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at Commercial-Scale July 31, 2013 - 1:37pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON - The Energy Department today recognized the nation's first commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol production at INEOS Bio's Indian River BioEnergy Center in Vero Beach, Florida. Developed through a joint venture between INEOS Bio and New Planet Energy, the project uses a unique hybrid of gasification and fermentation technology - originally developed with Energy Department support starting in the 1990's - to convert wood scraps, grass clippings and other waste materials into transportation fuels as well as energy for heat and power.

230

Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at Commercial-Scale Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic Ethanol at Commercial-Scale July 31, 2013 - 1:37pm Addthis News Media Contact (202) 586-4940 WASHINGTON - The Energy Department today recognized the nation's first commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol production at INEOS Bio's Indian River BioEnergy Center in Vero Beach, Florida. Developed through a joint venture between INEOS Bio and New Planet Energy, the project uses a unique hybrid of gasification and fermentation technology - originally developed with Energy Department support starting in the 1990's - to convert wood scraps, grass clippings and other waste materials into transportation fuels as well as energy for heat and power.

231

Lab partners with Navajo Nation on uranium mine project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

> Around the Lab > atl043013navajo 04302013 Lab partners with Navajo Nation on uranium mine project Linda A Lucchetti, LLNL, (925) 422-5815, lucchetti1@llnl.gov...

232

Overview of criminal justice projects at Sandia National Laboratories  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The criminal justice projects at SNL include three projects for the National Institute of Justice (smart gun, restraining foam, aqueous foam, corrections perimeter), a Southwest Border study, and one involving corrections agencies. It is concluded that the national technologies developed to protect nuclear and other high value assets have enormous potential for application to crime and personal safety; the difficulty lies in simplifying the technology transfer and making the new systems affordable.

Spencer, D.D.

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

National ID project of Nepal: future challenges  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Nepal is a small, landlocked and developing country in South Asia. It is bordered by China at North and India at South, East and West. The Government of Nepal, in order to achieve good governance and social-economic development, has initiated the e-Government ... Keywords: Nepal, challenges, government, national ID

Ganesh Prasad Adhikari

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

Correspondence (Top Secret) of the Manhattan Engineer District, 1942--1946  

SciTech Connect

This pamphlet prepared by the National Archives Trust Fund Board, National Archives Records Service provides an overview to a collection of formerly security classified `Top Secret` correspondence maintained by Major General Leslie Groves when commanding general of the Manhattan District from September, 1942 to December, 1946. The pamphlet describes the administrative history of the record collection. The records are described as well as how they are arranged along with finding aids and content of records. For further details concerning the se records the user is referred to the US National Archives, Washington.

1982-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

235

Successful neural network projects at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This paper presents recent and current projects at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) that research and apply neural network technology. The projects are summarized in the paper and their direct application to space reactor power and propulsion systems activities is discussed. 9 refs., 10 figs., 3 tabs.

Cordes, G.A.

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

236

Idaho National Laboratory, Former Production Workers Screening Projects |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho National Laboratory, Former Production Workers Screening Idaho National Laboratory, Former Production Workers Screening Projects Idaho National Laboratory, Former Production Workers Screening Projects Project Name: Worker Health Protection Program Covered DOE Site: INL Worker Population Served: Production Workers Principal Investigator: Jim Frederick Co-Principal Investigator: Steven Markowitz, MD Toll-free Telephone: (888) 241-1199 Local Outreach Office: David Fry 1055 Austin Avenue Idaho Falls, ID 83404 Community Care 2725 Channing Way Idaho Falls, ID 83404 Website: http://www.worker-health.org/ This project is conducted by the United Steelworkers, in conjunction with Queens College of the City University of New York. Free of charge, eligible workers can receive a medical exam, including chest X-ray and breathing

237

National Biomedical Tracer Facility. Project definition study  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We request a $25 million government-guaranteed, interest-free loan to be repaid over a 30-year period for construction and initial operations of a cyclotron-based National Biomedical Tracer Facility (NBTF) in North Central Texas. The NBTF will be co-located with a linear accelerator-based commercial radioisotope production facility, funded by the private sector at approximately $28 million. In addition, research radioisotope production by the NBTF will be coordinated through an association with an existing U.S. nuclear reactor center that will produce research and commercial radioisotopes through neutron reactions. The combined facilities will provide the full range of technology for radioisotope production and research: fast neutrons, thermal neutrons, and particle beams (H{sup -}, H{sup +}, and D{sup +}). The proposed NBTF facility includes an 80 MeV, 1 mA H{sup -} cyclotron that will produce proton-induced (neutron deficient) research isotopes.

Schafer, R.

1995-02-14T23:59:59.000Z

238

ATP Project Brief - 00-00-4403  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Sponsor: Uncopiers, Inc. 6923 Redbud Drive Manhattan, KS 66503-9123: Project Performance Period: 9/1/2001 - 8/31/2004; ...

239

Electric Transit Service for the City of Manhattan, Kansas  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report details results of an EPRI-commissioned study from the Santa Barbara Electric Transportation Institute (SBETI) relating to electric transit service for the City of Manhattan, Kansas.

2001-09-13T23:59:59.000Z

240

Contact Us | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Center Informational Materials Historical Highlights From Our Historian Historical Media Manhattan Project Resources Oral Histories Photo Gallery Video Gallery Related Links...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Renewable Energy Projections as Published in the National Renewable Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Renewable Energy Projections as Published in the National Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Projections as Published in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans of the European Member States Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary Name: Renewable Energy Projections as Published in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans of the European Member States Agency/Company /Organization: European Environment Agency, Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands Sector: Energy Focus Area: Renewable Energy Topics: Market analysis, Resource assessment, Background analysis Resource Type: Dataset Website: www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2010/e10069.pdf Country: Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Germany, Denmark, Greece, Spain, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, Slovenia, United Kingdom

242

Pantex breaks ground on renewable energy project | National Nuclear  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

breaks ground on renewable energy project | National Nuclear breaks ground on renewable energy project | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Pantex breaks ground on renewable energy project Pantex breaks ground on renewable energy project Posted By Office of Public Affairs Today was a rare windless day on the plains of the Texas Panhandle, but

243

Pantex breaks ground on renewable energy project | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

breaks ground on renewable energy project | National Nuclear breaks ground on renewable energy project | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Pantex breaks ground on renewable energy project Pantex breaks ground on renewable energy project Posted By Office of Public Affairs Today was a rare windless day on the plains of the Texas Panhandle, but

244

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #20, July-September 2008  

SciTech Connect

July to September, 2008 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter.

Schell, D. J.

2008-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #22, January - March 2009  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

January to March, 2009 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter.

Not Available

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

246

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #24, July-September 2009  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

July to September, 2009 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter.

Schell, D.

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

247

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #25, October - December 2009  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

October to December, 2009 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter.

Schell, D.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

248

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #15, April - June 2007  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

July quarterly update for the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Processing Platform Integration Project.

Schell, D.

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

249

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #23, April-June 2009  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

April to June, 2009 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter.

Schell, D.

2009-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Project Management Plan for the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project (IFDP) is to place former isotopes production facilities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in a safe, stable, and environmentally sound condition suitable for an extended period of minimum surveillance and maintenance (S&M) and as quickly and economically as possible. Implementation and completion of the deactivation project will further reduce the already small risks to the environment and to public safety and health. Furthermore, the project should result in significant S&M cost savings in the future. The IFDP management plan has been prepared to document the project objectives, define organizational relationships and responsibilities, and outline the management control systems to be employed in the management of the project. The project has adopted a strategy to deactivate the simple facilities first, to reduce the scope of the project, and to gain experience before addressing more difficult facilities. A decision support system is being developed to identify those activities, that best promote the project mission and result in largest cost savings. The Work Plan for the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Energy Systems 1994) defines the project schedule, the cost estimate, and the technical approach for the project.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

Los Alamos National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

remembers former director Harold remembers former director Harold Agnew September 30, 2013 Manhattan Project pioneer was LANL director from 1970-1979 LOS ALAMOS, N.M., Sept. 30, 2013-Los Alamos National Laboratory Director Charlie McMillan today remembered Harold Agnew as a national treasure who transformed the Laboratory into what it is in the 21st century. "His contributions to the Laboratory made us the institution we are today," McMillan said. "It was his vision - decades ago - that recognized that national security science - 2 - brings value to a broad spectrum of breakthroughs. Los Alamos and the nation will be forever in Harold's debt." Agnew died at home on Sunday, Sept. 29, his family announced. He was the third director of Los Alamos National Laboratory, succeeding Robert

252

Los Alamos National Laboratory's Bradbury Science Museum takes...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Science Museum building Some 40 interactive exhibits trace the history of the WWII Manhattan Project, highlight Los Alamos Laboratory's current and historic research...

253

Gallery of Historic Photos | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Gallery of Historic Photos Gallery of Historic Photos Ed Westcott Manhattan Project official photographer. All photos are by Ed Westcott, the government's official photographer for...

254

TA-21 Cleanup Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of schedule Technical Area 21 (TA-21) was one of the early sites of Manhattan Project and Cold War-era work at the Laboratory. The location of the world's first plutonium...

255

Recovery Act Funded Projects at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Berkeley National Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory OAS-RA-L-12-02 January 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 12, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, BERKELEY SITE OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo Director, Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Recovery Act Funded Projects at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory" Audit Report Number: OAS-RA-L-12-02 BACKGROUND In February 2009, the President signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) into law. The goals of the Recovery Act were to retain and create jobs, increase economic efficiency, and invest in infrastructure that would provide long-term economic benefits. The Department of Energy's (Department) Office of Science received $1.6 billion

256

From Project Sapphire to Today | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

From Project Sapphire to ... From Project Sapphire to ... From Project Sapphire to Today Posted: February 7, 2013 - 6:45pm | Y-12 Report | Volume 9, Issue 2 | 2013 At the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit, President Barack Obama set forth a large-scale effort to aggressively secure the world's vulnerable nuclear material. This effort to reduce the threat of nuclear terrorism was reinforced at the 2012 summit with continued support for the National Nuclear Security Administration's Global Threat Reduction Initiative. But nearly two decades earlier, Y-12 was quietly conducting missions to secure materials from foreign countries with proliferation concerns. In 1994 more than a thousand containers of nuclear material sat in metal racks on the floor in a cold, dilapidated warehouse at the end of a

257

Environmental assessment for the National Conversion Pilot Project, Stage 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the National Conversion Pilot Project (NCPP) is to explore and demonstrate, at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS), the feasibility of economic conversion at Department of Energy facilities. Economic conversion is the conversion of facilities and equipment owned by the Federal government to production of goods by private firms for profit. The NCPP mission is consistent with the RFETS current mission: to conduct site remediation, decontaminate and decommission site buildings and close the site in a manner that is safe, environmentally and socially responsible, physically secure, and cost effective. The NCPP is divided into three stages, with decision points at the ends of Stages 1 and 2 and periodically during Stage 3, to help ensure careful consideration of project effectiveness and to create an opportunity for regulators and stakeholders to provide comments to the DOE. At the end of each stage, the project can be reversed, authorized to proceed, or terminated.

NONE

1997-06-11T23:59:59.000Z

258

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPADE~llNATION RECIPIENT:North...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

*. * ). u .s. DEPARTMENT OFENERGr EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPADEllNATION RECIPIENT:North Carolina State University PROJECT TITLE : "Highly Energy Efficient Directed-Green...

259

SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Carbon Development Jump to: navigation, search Name SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National...

260

Sandia National Laboratories: The First Fifty Years  

SciTech Connect

On Nov. 1, 1999, Sandia National Laboratories celebrates its 50th birthday. Although Sandia has its roots in the World War II-era Manhattan Project, Sandia began operating as a separate nuclear weapons engineering laboratory under the management of AT&T on Nov. 1, 1949. Today the lab employs more than 7,000 people at its two sites in Albuquerque and Livermore, California, and has research and development missions in national security, energy and environmental technologies, and U.S. economic competitiveness. Lockheed Martin Corporation operates Sandia for the US. Department of Energy.

MORA,CARL J.

1999-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update No.5, October-December 2004  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Fifth issue of a quarterly reporting to stakeholders on progress on the National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Not Available

2005-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project Quarterly Update: April/June 2004, No.3  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Third issue of a quarterly reporting to stakeholders on progress on the National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Not Available

2004-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

263

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update No.6, January-March 2005  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Sixth issue of a quarterly reporting to stakeholders on progress on the National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project

Not Available

2005-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update, January/March 2004, No.2  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Second issue of a quarterly reporting to stakeholders on progress on the National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Not Available

2004-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

265

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #7, April-June 2005  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Volume 7 of a quarterly newsletter that describes the activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Not Available

2005-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update, Issue No.1, October-December 2003  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

First issue of a quarterly reporting to stakeholders on progress on the National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Not Available

2004-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update, July/September 2004, No.4  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Fourth issue of a quarterly reporting to stakeholders on progress on the National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project

Not Available

2004-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #11, April-June 2006  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Volume 11 of a quarterly newsletter that describes the activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Schell, D.

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #8, July-September 2005  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Volume 8 of a quarterly newsletter that describes the activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Schell, D.

2005-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #21, October - December 2008  

SciTech Connect

October to December, 2008 edition of the National Bioenergy Center?s Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter.

Schell, D.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

271

DOE National Laboratory Research Projects Win 31 R&D 100 Awards...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

for Teachers and Scientists Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Project Assessment Laboratories Ames Laboratory Argonne National...

272

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #9, October-December 2005  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Volume 9 of a quarterly newsletter that describes the activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Schell, D. J.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #10, January-March 2006  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Volume 10 of a quarterly newsletter that describes the activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Not Available

2006-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Process Integration Project: Quarterly Update #18, January-March 2008  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

January-March, 2008 edition of the quarterly update for the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project.

Schell, D.

2008-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

275

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #12, July-September 2006  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Volume 12 of a quarterly newsletter that describes the activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Schell, D.

2006-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #24, July-September 2009  

SciTech Connect

July to September, 2009 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter.

Schell, D.

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

277

Manhattan Project: Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Ernest Rutherford (and James Chadwick, on the far right) EXPLORING THE ATOM Ernest Rutherford (and James Chadwick, on the far right) EXPLORING THE ATOM (1919-1932) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 The road to the atomic bomb began in earnest in 1919 with the first artificial transmutation of an element. The New Zealander Ernest Rutherford, working in the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University in England, changed several atoms of nitrogen into oxygen. The final addition to the atomic "miniature solar system" first proposed by Niels Bohr came in 1932 when James Chadwick, Rutherford's colleague at Cambridge, identified the third and final basic particle of the atom: the neutron.

278

Manhattan Project: "Rad Lab" Staff  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

"RAD LAB" STAFF "RAD LAB" STAFF University of California, Berkeley (1939) Resources > Photo Gallery Rad Lab Staff, 1939 Lawrence Radiation Laboratory caption: "Early Radiation Laboratory staff framed by the magnet for 60-inch cyclotron in 1939. Front row, left to right: John H. Lawrence, Robert Serber, Franz N. D. Kurie, Raymond T. Birge, Ernest O. Lawrence, Donald Cooksey, Arthur H. Snell, Luis W. Alvarez, Philip H. Abelson. Second Row: John Backus, Wilfred B. Mann, Paul C. Aebersold, Edwin M. McMillan, Ernest Lyman, Martin D. Kamen, D. C. Kalbfell, W. W. Salisbury. Last row: Alex S. Langsdorf, Jr., Sam Simmons, Joseph G. Hamilton, David H. Sloan, J. Robert Oppenheimer, William Brobeck, Robert Cornog, Robert R. Wilson, Eugene Viez, J. J. Livingood."

279

Manhattan Project: Y-12: Design, 1942-1943  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Ernest Lawrence slumps in his chair from fatigue in front of a cyclotron control panel while conducting calutron-related experiments, Berkeley, 1943. Y-12: DESIGN Ernest Lawrence slumps in his chair from fatigue in front of a cyclotron control panel while conducting calutron-related experiments, Berkeley, 1943. Y-12: DESIGN (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1942-1943) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 Although the Lewis Report had placed gaseous diffusion ahead of the electromagnetic approach, many were still betting in early 1943 that Ernest Lawrence (right) and his "calutron" would eventually predominate. Lawrence and his laboratory of mechanics at the University of California, Berkeley, continued to experiment with the giant 184-inch cyclotron magnet, trying to reach a consensus on which shims, sources, and Electromagnetic method for the enrichment of uranium collectors to incorporate into the Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant that was to be built at Oak Ridge. Research on magnet size and placement and beam resolution led Lawrence and his group in fall 1942 to propose an arrangement of huge electromagnetic coils connected by a bus bar in an oval racetrack configuration, as seen from above. Forty-eight gaps in the racetrack between the coils would each contain two vacuum tanks. With two racetracks per building, ten buildings would be necessary to provide the estimated 2,000 sources and collectors needed to separate 100 grams of uranium-235 daily. The Berkeley researchers hoped that improvements in calutron design, or placing multiple sources and collectors in each tank, might increase efficiency and reduce the number of tanks and buildings required, but experimental results were inconclusive even as Stone & Webster of Boston, the Y-12 contractor at Oak Ridge, prepared to break ground.

280

Manhattan Project: The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn, Kaiser-Wilhelm Institute, Berlin THE DISCOVERY OF FISSION Berlin, Germany (1938-1939) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 The English word "atom" derives from the Greek word "atomon" ("ατομον"), which means "that which cannot be divided." In 1938, the scientific community proved the Greek philosophers wrong by dividing the atom. Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. Fission, the basis of the atomic bomb, was discovered in Nazi Germany less than a year before the beginning of the Second World War. It was December 1938 when the radiochemists Otto Hahn (above, with Lise Meitner) and Fritz Strassmann, while bombarding elements with neutrons in their Berlin laboratory, made their unexpected discovery. They found that while the nuclei of most elements changed somewhat during neutron bombardment, uranium nuclei changed greatly and broke into two roughly equal pieces. They split and became not the new transuranic elements that some thought Enrico Fermi had discovered but radioactive barium isotopes (barium has the atomic number 56) and other fragments of the uranium itself. The substances Fermi had created in his experiments, that is, did more than resemble lighter elements -- they were lighter elements. The products of the Hahn-Strassmann experiment weighed less than that of the original uranium nucleus, and herein lay the primary significance of their findings. It folIowed from Albert Einstein's E=mc2 equation that the loss of mass resulting from the splitting process must have been converted into energy in the form of kinetic energy that could in turn be converted into heat.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Manhattan Project: Y-12 Operation, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Oak Ridge Y-12: OPERATION Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Oak Ridge Y-12: OPERATION (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1943-1944) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 During the summer and fall of 1943, the Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant at Oak Ridge began to take shape. The huge buildings to house the operating equipment were readied as manufacturers began delivering everything from electrical switches to motors, valves, and tanks. While construction and outfitting proceeded, almost 5,000 operating and maintenance personnel were hired and trained. Then, between October and mid-December, Y-12 paid the price for being a new technology that had not been put through its paces in a pilot plant. Vacuum tanks in the first Alpha racetrack leaked and shimmied out of line due to magnetic pressure, welds failed, electrical circuits malfunctioned, and operators made frequent mistakes. Most seriously, the magnet coils shorted out because of rust and sediment in the cooling oil.

282

Manhattan Project: Early Government Support, 1939-1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard EARLY GOVERNMENT SUPPORT Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard EARLY GOVERNMENT SUPPORT (1939-1942) Events Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 As the news of the fission breakthrough spread from Berlin in early 1939, many physicists within the United States (and elsewhere) immediately realized the potential danger posed by atomic energy. Especially concerned were émigré physicists who had fled their native countries because of the expansion of Nazi Germany and sought to obtain governmental support for further, secret nuclear research. Convincing busy government officials of the seriousness of this esoteric new scientific development was at first slow going. One month before the Second World War formally began with the September 1, 1939, invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany, Leo Szilard enlisted the help of Albert Einstein in personally calling President Franklin Roosevelt's attention to the matter. Roosevelt responded by creating a government committee to coordinate and provide modest funding for early uranium research. Work also proceeded during this period on the design of an atomic pile that could demonstrate the potential of atomic energy and possibly provide a second path to the atomic bomb besides uranium.

283

Manhattan Project: President Truman signs the Atomic Energy Act  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

August 1, 1946. Senator Brien McMahon is third from right. Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-present > Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 Places > Los...

284

Manhattan Project: The Institutional Origins of the Department...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

The Institutional Origins of the Department of Energy Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-present > Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946 The Institutional Origins...

285

EA-1903: Kansas State University Zond Wind Energy Project, Manhattan...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Plains Wind Energy Consortium aimed at increasing the penetration of wind energy via distributed wind power generation throughout the region. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES...

286

Manhattan Project: Data Printout of CP-1 Going Critical  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Data printout of CP-1 going critical for the first time. It shows neutron intensity in the pile, as recorded by a galvanometer. Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 >...

287

Work of Manhattan Project-era photographer Ed Westcott lives...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

version Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr NNSA Blog October 2013 (1) September 2013 (18) August 2013 (17) July 2013 (20) June 2013 (19) May 2013 (25) April 2013 (17) March 2013...

288

Manhattan Project: Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Leslie Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer Home Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 > Groves and the MED, 1942 Events > Bringing it All Together, 1942-1945 Events > Bringing it All...

289

Manhattan Project: "Met Lab" Alumni  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Resources Resources About this Site How to Navigate this Site Library Maps Note on Sources Nuclear Energy and the Public's Right to Know Photo Gallery Site Map Sources and Notes Suggested Readings "MET LAB" ALUMNI University of Chicago (December 2, 1946) Resources > Photo Gallery Met Lab alumni pose at the University of Chicago, December 2, 1946. Alumni of the Met Lab pose on the steps of Eckhart Hall on the campus of the University of Chicago on December 2, 1946 (the fourth anniversary of CP-1 first going critical). Front row, left to right: Enrico Fermi, Walter Zinn, Albert Wattenberg, and Herbert Anderson. Middle row, left to right: Harold Agnew, William Sturm, Harold Lichtenberger, Leona W. Marshall, and Leo Szilard. Back row, left to right: Norman Hilberry, Samuel Allison, Thomas Brill, Robert Nobles, Warren Nyer, and Marvin Wilkening.

290

Manhattan Project: Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Enrico Fermi PILES AND PLUTONIUM Enrico Fermi PILES AND PLUTONIUM (1939-1942) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 The Uranium Committee's first report, issued on November 1, 1939, recommended that, despite the uncertainty of success, the government should immediately obtain four tons of graphite and fifty tons of uranium oxide. This recommendation led to the first outlay of government funds -- $6,000 in February 1940 -- and reflected the importance attached to the Fermi-Szilard pile (reactor) experiments already underway at Columbia University. Building upon the Fission chain reaction work performed in 1934 demonstrating the value of moderators in producing slow neutrons, Enrico Fermi thought that a mixture of the right moderator and natural uranium could produce a self-sustaining fission chain reaction. Fermi and Leo Szilard increasingly focused their attention on carbon in the form of graphite. Perhaps graphite could slow down, or moderate, the neutrons coming from the fission reaction, increasing the probability of their causing additional fissions in sustaining the chain reaction. A pile containing a large amount of natural uranium could then produce enough secondary neutrons to keep a reaction going.

291

Manhattan Project: A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

John Joseph Thomson A MINIATURE SOLAR SYSTEM John Joseph Thomson A MINIATURE SOLAR SYSTEM (1890s-1919) Events > Atomic Discoveries, 1890s-1939 A Miniature Solar System, 1890s-1919 Exploring the Atom, 1919-1932 Atomic Bombardment, 1932-1938 The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 Fission Comes to America, 1939 The modern effort to uncover the inner structure of the atom began with the discovery of the electron by the English physicist J. J. Thomson (above) in 1897. Thomson proved that cathode rays were not some sort of undefined process occurring in "ether" but were in fact composed of extremely small, negatively charged particles. Dubbed electrons, their exact charge and mass were soon determined by John Townsend and Robert Millikan. Excerpt from the comic book "Adventures Inside the Atom." Click on this image or visit the "Library" to view the whole comic book. At the same time, discoveries relating to the curious phenomenon of radioactivity had also begun to propel atomic research forward. In 1896, the French physicist Antoine Becquerel detected the three basic forms of radioactivity, which were soon named alpha, beta, and gamma by Ernest Rutherford, a student of Thomson from New Zealand. Also in 1896, the husband-and-wife team of Marie and Pierre Curie began work in Paris on the emission of radiation by uranium and thorium. The Curies soon announced their discoveries of radium and polonium; they also proved that beta particles were negatively charged. In 1900, Becquerel realized that beta particles and electrons were the same things.

292

Manhattan Project: Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

REORGANIZATION AND ACCELERATION REORGANIZATION AND ACCELERATION (1940-1941) Events > Early Government Support, 1939-1942 Einstein's Letter, 1939 Early Uranium Research, 1939-1941 Piles and Plutonium, 1939-1941 Reorganization and Acceleration, 1940-1941 The MAUD Report, 1941 A Tentative Decision to Build the Bomb, 1941-1942 Ernest Lawrence, 1935 During 1939 and 1940, most of the work done on uranium isotope separation and the chain reaction pile was performed in university laboratories by academic scientists funded primarily by private foundations. Although the federal government began supporting uranium research in 1940, the pace appeared too leisurely to the scientific community and failed to convince scientists that their work was of high priority. Certainly few were more inclined to this view than Ernest O. Lawrence (right), director of the Radiation Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley. Lawrence was among those who thought that it was merely a matter of time before the United States was drawn into World War II, and he wanted the government to mobilize its scientific forces as rapidly as possible.

293

Manhattan Project: Production Reactor (Pile) Design, Met Lab, 1942  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Schematic of the X-10 Graphite Reactor, Oak Ridge PRODUCTION REACTOR (PILE) DESIGN Schematic of the X-10 Graphite Reactor, Oak Ridge PRODUCTION REACTOR (PILE) DESIGN (Met Lab, 1942) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 By 1942, scientists had established that some of the uranium exposed to radioactivity in a reactor (pile) would eventually decay into plutonium, which could then be separated by chemical means from the uranium. Important theoretical research on this was ongoing, but the work was scattered at various universities from coast to coast. In early 1942, Arthur Compton arranged for all pile research to be moved to the Met Lab at the University of Chicago.

294

Manhattan Project: Beta Racetrack, Y-12, Oak Ridge  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Beta Racetrack, Y-12, Oak Ridge Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 > Y-12: Construction, Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1943 Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 >...

295

Manhattan Project: Generals Leslie Groves and Thomas Farrell  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Generals Leslie Groves and Thomas Farrell Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 > Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Washington, D.C., Late Spring 1945 Generals Leslie Groves and...

296

Manhattan Project: President Nixon and the "Atomic Pioneers"  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

PRESIDENT NIXON AND THE "ATOMIC PIONEERS" White House, Washington, D.C. (February 27, 1970) Resources > Photo Gallery Seaborg, Nixon, Groves, Bush, and Conant, ca. 1969-1970 This...

297

Manhattan Project: J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Ernest...  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Ernest Lawrence Events > Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945 > Debate Over How to Use the Bomb, Washington, D.C., Late Spring 1945 Events >...

298

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPADF~llNATION RECIPIENT:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

.rn.ThIENT OF FNFRGY .rn.ThIENT OF FNFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPADF~llNATION RECIPIENT: lnlel1igent Energy Inc. Page 1 of2 STATE: CA PROJECT TITLE : Development and Demonstration of a New GenerationHigh Efficiency 1· 10kW Stationary Fuel Cell System Funding Opportunity AnnouDI::emenl Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE·PS36-06G096017 DE-FG36-07G017013 GFO-G017013'{)()2 G017013 Based on my review oftbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliam::e Offku (autborized under DOE Order 4Sl.IA), I bave made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits). data analysis (including

299

EA-1933: Yakama Nation Drop 4 Hydropower Project, Yakama Nation Reservation, WA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

DOE is a cooperating agency with the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Indian Affairs as a lead agency for the preparation of an EA to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of a proposal by the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation Department of Natural Resources to install an inline turbine on the Wapato Irrigation Project (WIP) Main Canal to generate approximately one megawatt of supplemental hydroelectric power. The Main Canal is a non-fish bearing irrigation canal within the WIP water conveyance system. The project site is located two miles southwest of Harrah, Washington.

300

Clean Cities: Submitting Project Ideas for the Clean Cities National Parks  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Submitting Project Ideas for the Clean Submitting Project Ideas for the Clean Cities National Parks Initiative to someone by E-mail Share Clean Cities: Submitting Project Ideas for the Clean Cities National Parks Initiative on Facebook Tweet about Clean Cities: Submitting Project Ideas for the Clean Cities National Parks Initiative on Twitter Bookmark Clean Cities: Submitting Project Ideas for the Clean Cities National Parks Initiative on Google Bookmark Clean Cities: Submitting Project Ideas for the Clean Cities National Parks Initiative on Delicious Rank Clean Cities: Submitting Project Ideas for the Clean Cities National Parks Initiative on Digg Find More places to share Clean Cities: Submitting Project Ideas for the Clean Cities National Parks Initiative on AddThis.com... Goals & Accomplishments

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

A History of Building 828, Sandia National Laboratories  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the history of Building 828 in Sandia National Laboratories' Technical Area I. Building 828 was constructed in 1946 as a mechanical test laboratory for Los Alamos' Z-Division (later Sandia) as it moved to Sandia Base. The building has undergone significant remodeling over the years and has had a variety of occupants. The building was evaluated in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act, but was not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Nevertheless, for many Labs employees, it was a symbol of Sandia's roots in World War II and the Manhattan Project.

Ullrich, Rebecca

1999-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

A History of Building 828, Sandia National Laboratories  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the history of Building 828 in Sandia National Laboratories' Technical Area I. Building 828 was constructed in 1946 as a mechanical test laboratory for Los Alamos' Z-Division (later Sandia) as it moved to Sandia Base. The building has undergone significant remodeling over the years and has had a variety of occupants. The building was evaluated in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act, but was not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Nevertheless, for many Labs employees, it was a symbol of Sandia's roots in World War II and the Manhattan Project.

Ullrich, Rebecca

1999-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

303

Manhattan Beach, California: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Manhattan Beach, California: Energy Resources Manhattan Beach, California: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 33.8847361°, -118.4109089° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":33.8847361,"lon":-118.4109089,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

304

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DETFIU.fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lA."! lA."! l u.s. DEPARTMENT OFENFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DETFIU.fiNATION Page I of3 RECIPIENT:Caelux Corporation STATE : CA PROJECf TITLE : Low-cost, Flexible, Microslruclured Solar Cells - Caelux Corporation; NREL Tracking No. 011-022 Funding Opportunity Announcement Num ber Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number NREL-11-022 G010337 Based on my .-eview of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451. 1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply

305

EERE News: Florida Project Produces Nation's First Cellulosic...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

the local community. The project's gasification-fermentation technology-which produces fuel, heat and power-has its roots in a University of Arkansas research project, supported...

306

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER Nl'PA D:E1'ERJvllNATION RECIPIENT...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

s DEP . .Rnn:NT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER Nl'PA D:E1'ERJvllNATION RECIPIENT:Terralog Technologies USA Inc Page I of2 STATE: CA PROJECT TITLE: Advanced Horizontal...

307

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #16, July-September 2007  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This quarterly update contains information on the National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project, R&D progress and related activities.

Schell, D.

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Procedures for preparation, printing, and distribution of UMTRA Project National Environmental Policy Act documents  

SciTech Connect

This paper discusses the procedures for preparation, printing and distribution of Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project National Environmental Policy Act documents. (KJD)

Not Available

1988-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

309

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Process Integration Project: Quarterly Update #18, January-March 2008  

SciTech Connect

January-March, 2008 edition of the quarterly update for the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project.

Schell, D.

2008-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

National Bioenergy Center Sugar Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #12, July-September 2006  

SciTech Connect

Volume 12 of a quarterly newsletter that describes the activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Sugar Platform Integration Project.

Schell, D.

2006-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Isotopes facilities deactivation project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The production and distribution of radioisotopes for medical, scientific, and industrial applications has been a major activity at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) since the late 1940s. As the demand for many of these isotopes grew and their sale became profitable, the technology for the production of the isotopes was transferred to private industry, and thus, many of the production facilities at ORNL became underutilized. In 1989, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) instructed ORNL to identify and prepare various isotopes production facilities for safe shutdown. In response, ORNL identified 19 candidate facilities for shutdown and established the Isotopes Facilities Shutdown Program. In 1993, responsibility for the program was transitioned from the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy to the DOE Office of Environmental Management and Uranium Enrichment Operation`s Office of Facility Transition and Management. The program was retitled the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project (IFDP), and implementation responsibility was transferred from ORNL to the Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. (LMES), Environmental Restoration (ER) Program.

Eversole, R.E.

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

Technology integration project: Environmental Restoration Technologies Department Sandia National Laboratories  

SciTech Connect

Sandia National Laboratories Environmental Restoration Technologies Department is developing environmental restoration technologies through funding form the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Office of Science and Technology. Initially, this technology development has been through the Mixed Waste Landfill Integrated Demonstration (MWLID). It is currently being developed through the Contaminant Plume containment and Remediation Focus Area, the Landfill Stabilization Focus Area, and the Characterization, Monitoring, and Sensor Cross-Cutting Program. This Technology Integration Project (TIP) was responsible for transferring MWLID-developed technologies for routine use by environmental restoration groups throughout the DOE complex and commercializing these technologies to the private sector. The MWLID`s technology transfer/commercialization successes were achieved by involving private industry in development, demonstration, and technology transfer/commercialization activities; gathering and disseminating information about MWLID activities and technologies; and promoting stakeholder and regulatory involvement. From FY91 through FY95, 30 Technical Task Plans (TTPs) were funded. From these TTPs, the MWLID can claim 15 technology transfer/commercialization successes. Another seven technology transfer/commercialization successes are expected. With the changeover to the focus areas, the TIP continued the technology transfer/commercialization efforts begun under the MWLID.

Williams, C.V.; Burford, T.D. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States). Environmental Restoration Technologies] [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States). Environmental Restoration Technologies; Allen, C.A. [Tech Reps, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States)] [Tech Reps, Inc., Albuquerque, NM (United States)

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

313

US Virgin Islands-Energy Development in Island Nations (EDIN) Pilot Project  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

US Virgin Islands-Energy Development in Island Nations (EDIN) Pilot Project US Virgin Islands-Energy Development in Island Nations (EDIN) Pilot Project Jump to: navigation, search Logo: US Virgin Islands-Energy Development in Island Nations (EDIN) Pilot Project Name US Virgin Islands-Energy Development in Island Nations (EDIN) Pilot Project Agency/Company /Organization National Renewable Energy Laboratory, United States Department of Energy Partner EDIN Initiative Partners Sector Energy Focus Area Energy Efficiency Topics Background analysis, Low emission development planning Website http://www.edinenergy.org/usvi Country US Virgin Islands Latin America and the Caribbean References National Renewable Energy Laboratory, EERE Supported International Activities FY 2009 Annual Operating Plan (August 25, 2009 Abstract The purpose of the EDIN pilot is to have a meaningful impact in a short duration by developing clean energy technologies, policies, and financing mechanisms for the pilot island with projects whose elements can be repeated on other islands.

314

Rwanda-Project to Develop a National Strategy on Climate Change and Low  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Rwanda-Project to Develop a National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Rwanda-Project to Develop a National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Carbon Development Jump to: navigation, search Name SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Carbon Development Agency/Company /Organization United Kingdom Department for International Development, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Partner Smith School for Enterprise and Environment, University of Oxford Sector Climate, Energy, Land Topics Implementation, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Website http://www.smithschool.ox.ac.u Program Start 2010 Country Rwanda UN Region Middle Africa References SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Carbon Development[1] SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Carbon Development Screenshot

315

Project management plan for the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Environmental Restoration Program  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project (IFDP) is to place nineteen former isotopes production facilities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in a safe, stable, and environmentally sound condition suitable for an extended period of minimum surveillance and maintenance (S&M) and as quickly and economically as possible. Implementation and completion of the deactivation project win further reduce the already small risks to the environment and to public safety and health. Furthermore, the project should result in significant S&M cost savings in the future. The IFDP management plan has been prepared to document the project objectives, define organizational relationships and responsibilities, and outline the management control systems to be employed in the management of the project. The project has adopted a strategy to deactivate the simple facilities first, to reduce the scope of the project, and to gain experience before addressing more difficult facilities. A decision support system is being developed to identify those activities that best promote the project mission and result in largest cost savings. The Work Plan for the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Energy Systems 1994) defines the project schedule, the cost estimate, and the technical approach for the project.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

The Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Radioactive Liquid Waste Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory OAS-L-13-15 September 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 26, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT MANAGER LOS ALAMOS FIELD OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory (Los Alamos) is a Government- owned, contractor operated Laboratory that is part of the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) nuclear weapons complex. Los Alamos' primary responsibility is to

317

Coupled Site Characterization and Foundation Analysis Research Project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Coupled Site Characterization and Foundation Analysis Research Project: Further Research into the Rational Selection of for Bearing Capacity Analysis under Drained-Strength Conditions Manhattan College Research Report No. CE/GE-00-3 by John S. Horvath, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Civil Engineering Manhattan

Horvath, John S.

318

DOE Collaborates with National Geographic's JASON Project on Award-Winning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Collaborates with National Geographic's JASON Project on Collaborates with National Geographic's JASON Project on Award-Winning Curriculum DOE Collaborates with National Geographic's JASON Project on Award-Winning Curriculum June 17, 2011 - 1:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A new JASON Project geology unit, developed with assistance from the Office of Fossil Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), has earned a prestigious "CODiE Award" as the nation's Best Science or Health curriculum. Operation: Tectonic Fury--which unlocks the Earth's geologic mysteries through investigation of its past, present and future - is the fourth unit in a new line of middle school science curricula developed by the nonprofit subsidiary of the National Geographic Society. The CODiE Awards are presented annually by the Software & Information Industry Association

319

Nuclear Science and Physics Data from the Isotopes Project, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)  

DOE Data Explorer (OSTI)

The Isotopes Project pages at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have been a source of nuclear data and reference information since the mid-nineties. Almost all of the data, the results of analyses, the specialized charts and interfaces, and the extensive bibiographic references are fed to the National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory and maintained there. The Isotope Project pages at LBNL provide a glimpse of early versions for many of the nuclear data resources.

None

320

Preliminary Lessons Learned From The Gunite And Associated Tanks (gaat) Remediation Project At Oakridge National Laboratory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Gunite and Associated Tanks (GAAT) Remediation Project is being conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and has been noted as one of the most highly successful tank remediation projects conducted within the U.S. Department of Energy. The GAAT Remediation Project has successfully integrated robotic, remotely operated, and other equipment, and several contractors to achieve measurable results. With the project under cost and ahead of schedule and tank waste removal activities on track for a September 2000 completion, the GAAT team has begun the effort to capture the lessons learned from this extremely successful project. This paper is a preliminary compilation of the lessons learned during the project, with a complete compilation scheduled for the end of the project. PROJECT HISTORY The Gunite and Associated Tanks (GAAT) Remediation Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was initiated in 1992 under the Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) between the U.S. Depar...

Karen Billingsley; S. D. Van Hoesen; Tom Hylton; Peter D. Lloyd; Joel A. Miller; The Gunite; Associated Tanks (gaat Remediation; Robbin Russell John; John A. Emison; Abby Parker; Glen Tubb; Barry L. Burks; R. Eric Depew; Diedre D. Falter; David P. Vesco

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Home National Sports Business World Features Columns Editorial Japan has key role in ITER project  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

the Congress concerning the United States' share of the costs of the ITER project. The United States quit project The Yomiuri Shimbun The dispute over which nation should host the world's first nuclear fusion, using the ITER project as a basis for achieving the goal. The ITER would be a gigantic facility

322

Page Name: Subject/Program/Project, Acronym: Los Alamos National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

National Laboratory is an extremely versatile Nd:glass laser system dedicated to high-energy-density physics research and fundamental laser-matter interactions. More about the...

323

Metropolis Fellowship, ASC: Los Alamos National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Ulam and John von Neumann, of the Monte Carlo method. He came to Los Alamos during the Manhattan Project and spent most of his career there. For more information please see...

324

EA-1809: White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project II, Becker and Mahnomen  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09: White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project II, Becker and 09: White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project II, Becker and Mahnomen Counties, MN EA-1809: White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project II, Becker and Mahnomen Counties, MN Summary This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to provide Congressionally Directed funds to the White Earth Nation to purchase and install up to four small mid-sized wind turbines at two sites near the towns of Waubun and Naytahwaush on the White Earth Reservation in Mahnomen County in western Minnesota Public Comment Opportunities None available at this time. Documents Available for Download April 26, 2012 EA-1809: Finding of No Significant Impact White Earth Nation Wind Energy Project II, Becker and Mahnomen Counties, MN April 26, 2012 EA-1809: Final Environmental Assessment

325

SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate Change and  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate Change and SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Carbon Development Jump to: navigation, search Name SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Carbon Development Agency/Company /Organization United Kingdom Department for International Development, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Partner Smith School for Enterprise and Environment, University of Oxford Sector Climate, Energy, Land Topics Implementation, Low emission development planning, Policies/deployment programs Website http://www.smithschool.ox.ac.u Program Start 2010 Country Rwanda UN Region Middle Africa References SSEE-Project to Develop a Rwandan National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Carbon Development[1]

326

Page Name: Subject/Program/Project, Acronym: Los Alamos National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in off-site, state-of-the-art experimental facilities at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) and the OMEGA laser facility in Rochester, New York. Featured science Fusion target...

327

Improving Projected Potential Evapotranspiration Estimates Using National Weather Service Forecasts  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In a recent survey conducted by the University of Nebrask's Center for Agricultural Meteorology and Climatology of Agricultural Network (AGNET) users, the results of potential evapotranspiration (ETp) projections (calculated using the Blaney-...

Steven J. Meyer; Kenneth G. Hubbard; Donald A. Wilhite

1988-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Project management plan for the gunite and associated tanks treatability studies project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

SciTech Connect

This plan for the Gunite and Associated Tanks (GAAT) Treatability Studies Project satisfies the requirements of the program management plan for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Environmental Restoration (ER) Program as established in the Program Management Plan for the Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Environmental Restoration Program. This plan is a subtier of several other ER documents designed to satisfy the US Department of Energy (DOE) Order 4700.1 requirement for major systems acquisitions. This project management plan identifies the major activities of the GAAT Treatability Studies Project; establishes performance criteria; discusses the roles and responsibilities of the organizations that will perform the work; and summarizes the work breakdown structure, schedule, milestones, and cost estimate for the project.

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

Gunite and associated tanks remediation project recycling and waste minimization effort  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy`s Environmental Management Program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory has initiated clean up of legacy waste resulting from the Manhattan Project. The gunite and associated tanks project has taken an active pollution prevention role by successfully recycling eight tons of scrap metal, reusing contaminated soil in the Area of Contamination, using existing water (supernate) to aid in sludge transfer, and by minimizing and reusing personal protective equipment (PPE) and on-site equipment as much as possible. Total cost savings for Fiscal Year 1997 activities from these efforts are estimated at $4.2 million dollars.

Van Hoesen, S.D.; Saunders, A.D.

1998-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Gunite and Associated Tanks Stabilization Project-Low-Tech Approach with High-Tech Results  

SciTech Connect

Environmental restoration of the Gunite and Associated Tanks (GAAT) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was a priority to the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) because of their age and deteriorating structure. These eight tanks ranging up to 170,000 gallons in capacity were constructed in 1943 of a Gunite or ''sprayed concrete material'' as part of the Manhattan Project. The tanks initially received highly radioactive waste from the Graphite Reactor and associated chemical processing facilities. The waste was temporarily stored in these tanks to allow for radioactive decay prior to dilution and release into surface waters. Over time, additional wastes from ongoing ORNL operations (e.g., isotope separation and materials research) were discharged to the tanks for storage and treatment. These tanks were taken out of service in the 1970s. Based on the structure integrity of GAAT evaluated in 1995, the worst-case scenario for the tanks, even assuming they are in good condition, is to remain empty. A recently completed interim action conducted from April 1997 through September 2000 removed the tank liquids and residual solids to the extent practical. Interior video surveys of the tanks indicated signs of degradation of the Gunite material. The tanks continued to receive inleakage, which generated a relatively high volume waste stream that required periodic removal, treatment, and disposal. For these reasons, DOE chose in-place stabilization of Tanks W-3 through W-10 as a non-timecritical removal action under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Tank stabilization activities involved removal of liquid from inleakage and placement of a grout mixture or ''flowable fill'' into the tanks to within 3-ft of the ground surface. Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC (BJC) awarded Safety and Ecology Corporation (SEC) a subcontract in March 2001 to complete the documentation and fieldwork necessary to achieve tank stabilization in accordance with the Action Memorandum. Tank stabilization activities began on April 23, 2001, and were completed one month ahead of schedule on August 31, 2001. Over 7400 cubic yards of grout were placed in these tanks stabilizing over 4,000 Ci of radioactive material in place. This schedule acceleration was the result of good pre-planning during pre-mobilization by working with BJC, grout vendor, and pumping company, and other subcontractors. This planning allowed refinement of the pump and hose system used to convey the grout and the formulation of the grout mixture. Because of expediting the work, additional activities could be accomplished at the GAAT site that resulted in complete site restoration to a paved area for future parking, which was completed by September 30, 2001. This paper will focus on the following items associated with this successful environmental restoration project: regulatory process; integrated safety management systems used to achieve zero accident performance while expediting the schedule; tank stabilization design and implementation; and implementation strategies involving partnering of multiple subcontractors, DOE, and regulators.

Brill, A.; Alsup, T.; Bolling, D.

2002-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

331

CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

TRU ALPHA LLWT TRU ALPHA LLWT Project CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project November 2003 A section of Appendix C to DOE G 226.1-2 "Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities." Consists of Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs) used for a November 2003 assessment of the Safety Basis portion of an Operational Readiness Review of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project. CRADs provide a recommended approach and the types of information to gather to assess elements of a DOE contractor's programs. CRAD, Safety Basis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT Project More Documents & Publications CRAD, Conduct of Operations - Oak Ridge National Laboratory TRU ALPHA LLWT

332

National Conference of State Legislators Geothermal Project. Final report, February 1978-September 1982  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The activities of the National Conference of State Legislatures Geothermal Project in stimulating and assessing state legislative action to encourage the efficient development of geothermal resources, including the use of ground water heat pumps, are reviewed by state. (MHR)

Not Available

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

The National Hurricane Research Project: 50 Years of Research, Rough Rides, and Name Changes  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

After the disastrous Atlantic hurricane season of 1954, the Weather Bureau created the National Hurricane Research Project (NHRP) to advance tropical cyclone science and improve forecasts. In the late 1950s, NHRP pioneered quantitative ...

Neal M. Dorst

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

National Bioenergy Center--Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update, Fall 2010  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Fall 2010 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter. Issue topics: rapid analysis models for compositional analysis of intermediate process streams; engineered arabinose-fermenting Zymomonas mobilis strain.

Schell, D.

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

31 - 4740 of 9,477 results. Page MANHATTAN PROJECT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK The Department, as the direct descendent of the Manhattan Engineer District, owns and manages the...

336

Case Studies of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Offset Projects Implemented in the United Nations Clean Development Mechanism  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This paper describes case studies of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions offset project activities undertaken within the United Nations Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) program. This paper is designed to communicate key lessons learned from the implementation of different types of GHG emissions offsets projects in the CDM to policy makers in the U.S. who may be interested in developing national, regional or state-based GHG offsets programs. This paper also is designed to provide important insights to entitie...

2011-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

337

Renewable Energy Projections as Published in the National  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

methanation reactor limits somewhat the production of methane. In SNG plants using the full HICOM and TREMP = National Energy Technology Laboratory O&M = operation and maintenance SNG = substitute natural gas SOFC to substitute natural gas (SNG) using TREMPTM", www.topsoe.com (last accessed October 31, 2011) [45]Gerdes, K

338

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory - NM 11  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory - NM 11 TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory - NM 11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TA-1 MANHATTAN LABORATORY (NM.11 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Main Technical Area LASL LANL NM.11-1 NM.11-2 NM.11-3 Location: Los Alamos , New Mexico NM.11-3 Evaluation Year: 1985 NM.11-1 Site Operations: Nuclear weapons research and development. NM.11-1 NM.11-3 Site Disposition: Site Disposition NM.11-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium , Plutonium, Fission Products NM.11-1 NM.11-3 Radiological Survey(s): Yes NM.11-2 NM.11-3 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP NM.11-1 Also see Documents Related to TA-1 MANHATTAN LABORATORY NM.11-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist; Jones to File; Subject:

339

DOE/EA-1663: Environmental Assessment for BP Solar Array Project Brookhaven National Laboratory (December 2009)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

BP SOLAR ARRAY PROJECT BP SOLAR ARRAY PROJECT BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY UPTON, NEW YORK Brookhaven Site Office December 2009 DOE/EA-1663 i Table of Contents 1.0 PREFACE ........................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................................................... 12

340

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Honolulu Laboratory Renewal Project, Honolulu, Hawaii  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This brochure provides an overview of The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Honolulu Laboratory Renewal Project, a project designed to adhere to the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system. Diagrams of the HVAC system and the rainwater collection system are included.

Not Available

2002-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETl!Rl\fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETl!Rl\fiNATION DETl!Rl\fiNATION Page 1 of2 RECIPIENT:Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin STATE: WI PROJECT TITLE : Oneida Nation Energy Optimization model development project Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Numlnr elD Number DE-EEOOO5055 GFQ-OOOS055-001 G05055 Based on my I"tview orlhe information concerning the proposed action, as N[PA Compliance Omcer (authorized under DOE Ordu 4S1.1A),1 have made tbe (ollowing determination : ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 83.6 Small-scale Siting, construction, modification, operation, and decommissioning of facilities for smaliscale research research and and development projects; conventional laboratory operations (such as preparation of chemical development, standards and sample analysis); and small-scale pilot projects (generally less than 2 years)

342

NETL: News Release - DOE Selects 5 New Projects to Bolster Nation's Future  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

September 5, 2000 September 5, 2000 DOE Selects 5 New Projects to Bolster Nation's Future Natural Gas Supplies With "deeper and denser" likely to become the axiom for tomorrow's natural gas producers, the Department of Energy is adding five new projects to its natural gas research program. For three of the projects, the target is natural gas buried under extremely hard rock formations, trapped in gas hydrates on the ocean floor, and in remote regions of the Arctic. The other two explore ways to keep low-volume "stripper" gas wells flowing and to boost the amount of "working gas" stored in salt caverns. The projects are the latest to be selected from a broad-ranging competition conducted for the Energy Department's Office of Fossil Energy by the National Energy Technology Laboratory. The five projects have a total value approaching $7 million, $4.7 million of which will be the federal government's share.

343

National Ignition Facility Project Completion and Control System Status  

SciTech Connect

The National Ignition Facility (NIF) is the world's largest and most energetic laser experimental system providing a scientific center to study inertial confinement fusion (ICF) and matter at extreme energy densities and pressures. Completed in 2009, NIF is a stadium-sized facility containing a 1.8-MJ, 500-TW 192-beam ultraviolet laser and target chamber. A cryogenic tritium target system and suite of optical, X-ray and nuclear diagnostics will support experiments in a strategy to achieve fusion ignition starting in 2010. Automatic control of NIF is performed by the large-scale Integrated Computer Control System (ICCS), which is implemented by 2 MSLOC of Java and Ada running on 1300 front-end processors and servers. The ICCS framework uses CORBA distribution for interoperation between heterogeneous languages and computers. Laser setup is guided by a physics model and shots are coordinated by data-driven distributed workflow engines. The NIF information system includes operational tools and a peta-scale repository for provisioning experimental results. This paper discusses results achieved and the effort now underway to conduct full-scale operations and prepare for ignition.

Van Arsdall, P J; Azevedo, S G; Beeler, R G; Bryant, R M; Carey, R W; Demaret, R D; Fisher, J M; Frazier, T M; Lagin, L J; Ludwigsen, A P; Marshall, C D; Mathisen, D G; Reed, R K

2009-10-02T23:59:59.000Z

344

Defense Programs: the mission | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2013 During the early days of World War II, fear that Germany would create and use an atomic bomb led the U.S. to secretly launch the Manhattan Project to build one first....

345

LOS ALAMOS, New Mexico, November 1, 2012-Los Alamos National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

waste disposal facility. MDA B was used from 1944 to 1948 as a waste disposal site for Manhattan Project and Cold War-era research and production. The Laboratory received 212...

346

Decontamination and dismantlement of the JANUS Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory-East. Project final report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The decontamination and dismantlement of the JANUS Reactor at Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E) was completed in October 1997. Descriptions and evaluations of the activities performed and analyses of the results obtained during the JANUS D and D Project are provided in this Final Report. The following information is included: objective of the JANUS D and D Project; history of the JANUS Reactor facility; description of the ANL-E site and the JANUS Reactor facility; overview of the D and D activities performed; description of the project planning and engineering; description of the D and D operations; summary of the final status of the JANUS Reactor facility based upon the final survey results; description of the health and safety aspects of the project, including personnel exposure and OSHA reporting; summary of the waste minimization techniques utilized and total waste generated by the project; and summary of the final cost and schedule for the JANUS D and D Project.

Fellhauer, C.R.; Clark, F.R. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Technology Development Div.; Garlock, G.A. [MOTA Corp., Cayce, SC (United States)

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

DOE National Laboratory Research Projects Win 31 R&D 100 Awards for 2007 |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DOE National DOE National Laboratory Research Projects Win 31 R&D 100 Awards for 2007 News Featured Articles Science Headlines 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Presentations & Testimony News Archives Contact Information Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-5430 10.19.07 DOE National Laboratory Research Projects Win 31 R&D 100 Awards for 2007 Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy's Under Secretary for Science Raymond L. Orbach today lauded researchers from ten of the Department of Energy's world-class national laboratories that last night were awarded 31 of the world's top 100 scientific and technological innovations in 2007, as judged by R&D Magazine. The awards are presented

348

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEIU.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

llNATION llNATION Rt:CIPIENT :Sapphire Energy, Inc. PROJECT TITL.E; The Development of Value-Added Products from Algae Residual Biomass Page I of2 STATE: NM Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-EEOOOO393 GF().OOO()393-001 0 Based on my review orlhe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I ha ~'e made the following determination: ex, EA, t:IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 83.6 Siting, construction (or modification), operation, and decommissioning of facilities for indoor bench-scale research projects and conventional laboratory operations (for example, preparation of chemical standards and sample analysis); small-scale researd'l and development projects: and small-scale pilot projects (generally less than two years) conducted

349

Legacy of a Bomb: The Manhattan Projects Impact on the Scientific Community  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to necessary to produce plutonium. Hanford Facility producedLANL remains a military research center, its plutonium andseparated plutonium from uranium and fis- contributions to

Gao, Jany Huan

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

Legacy of a Bomb: The Manhattan Projects Impact on the Scientific Community  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1993. Atomic Harvest: Hanford and the Lethal Toll ofs technological innovations. Hanford Site remained a nucleartechnology. Some in Hanford and most of the structures were

Gao, Jany Huan

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

351

Mr. Walter Huber, Director Capital Improvements Division National Capital Region  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Walter Huber, Director Walter Huber, Director Capital Improvements Division National Capital Region 7th & D Streets, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20407 Dear Mr. Huber: As you may know, the Department of Energy (DOE) is evaluating the radiological condition of sites that were utilized under the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) during the early years of nuclear development to determine whether they need remedial action and whether the Department has authority to perform such action. General Services Administration (GSA) was contacted through correspondence with Mr. John P. Allen, Project Director, Special Projects Division of GSA, that the former National Bureau of Standards (NBS) building on Van Ness Street was identified as one such site. This building was used by NBS

352

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT OUTSIDE AREAS BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY UPTON, NEW YORK  

SciTech Connect

5098-SR-03-0 FINAL REPORT- INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT OUTSIDE AREAS, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

P.C. Weaver

2010-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

353

Underground Test Area Quality Assurance Project Plan Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) provides the overall quality assurance (QA) program requirements and general quality practices to be applied to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Underground Test Area (UGTA) Sub-Project (hereafter the Sub-Project) activities. The requirements in this QAPP are consistent with DOE Order 414.1C, Quality Assurance (DOE, 2005); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans for Modeling (EPA, 2002); and EPA Guidance on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of Environmental Models (EPA, 2009). The QAPP Revision 0 supersedes DOE--341, Underground Test Area Quality Assurance Project Plan, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 4.

Irene Farnham

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

354

Environmental testing philosophy for a Sandia National Laboratories small satellite project  

SciTech Connect

Sandia National Laboratories is the system integrator on a small satellite project. Following the intent of the NASA GEVS document, an integrated test philosophy was formulated to certify the satellite for flight. The purpose of this paper is to present that philosophy.

Cap, J.S.; Rackley, N.G.

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

National Bioenergy Center, Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update, Summer 2011 (Newsletter)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Summer 2011 issue of the National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly update. Issue topics: evaluating new analytical techniques for measuring soluble sugars in the liquid portion of biomass hydrolysates, and measurement of the fraction of insoluble solids in biomass slurries.

Not Available

2011-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

356

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #28, Spring 2011  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Spring 2011 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter. Issue topics: 33rd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals program sessions and special topic sessions; assessment of waste water treatment needs; and an update on new arabinose-to-ethanol fermenting Zymomonas mobilis strains.

Schell, D. J.

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #27, April - June 2010  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

April-June, 2010 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter. Issue topics: understanding performance of alternative process configurations for producing ethanol from biomass; investigating Karl Fischer Titration for measuring water content of pretreated biomass slurries.

Schell, D.

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

358

National Bioenergy Center - Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update, Winter 2010  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Winter 2011 edition of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly newsletter. Issue topics: 33rd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals program topic areas; results from reactive membrane extraction of inhibitors from dilute-acid pretreated corn stover; list of 2010 task publications.

Schell, D.

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Wind Energy Research Project under the 6th Framework Programme Peter Hjuler Jensen, Ris National Laboratory,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UpWind Wind Energy Research Project under the 6th Framework Programme Peter Hjuler Jensen, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark 1. Abstract. The paper presents the until now largest EU wind energy research relevant for the wind energy sector and thereby is UpWind a very strong forum the most of the central

360

BLACKFEET NATION FIRST STEPS TO RENEWABLE ENERGY ENERGY ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL REPORT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Blackfeet Nation Energy Organization Development project, which was funded through the auspices of the Department of Energy First Steps to Renewable Energy Grant, has produced a centralized effort that assists the Blackfeet Tribal Business Council in the proper management, development, and informed decision making ability to negotiate and develop Blackfeet Renewable Energy opportunities, with a special emphasis on wind energy development. In addition, the Blackfeet Nation has been armed with an enhanced ability to examine environmental and legal issues, perform market research, identify additional lands for possible acquisition and development, and examine wind energy projects by other tribes that serve as models. The product of this effort has been that the Blackfeet Nation formerly petitioned the Bureau of Indian Affairs to approve and charter an Indian Reorganization Act, Section 17 Corporation, the Blackfeet Renewable Energy Inc. Please See Attachment.

JERI LAWRENCE, RENEWABLE ENERGY DIRECTOR

2008-05-14T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

DOE National Laboratory Research Projects Win 31 R&D Awards for 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Research Projects Win 31 R&D Awards for Laboratory Research Projects Win 31 R&D Awards for 2007 DOE National Laboratory Research Projects Win 31 R&D Awards for 2007 October 19, 2007 - 3:21pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy's Under Secretary for Science Raymond L. Orbach today lauded researchers from ten of the Department of Energy's world-class national laboratories that last night were awarded 31 of the world's top 100 scientific and technological innovations in 2007, as judged by R&D Magazine. The awards are presented annually in recognition of the most outstanding technology developments with commercial potential. 18 of the awards won by DOE lab researchers were shared with researchers from universities and businesses. R&D Magazine presented the awards last night at its 45th Annual R&D Awards

362

NETL: News Release - DOE Selects Eight National Lab Projects as Research to  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

February 18, 2000 February 18, 2000 DOE Selects Eight National Lab Projects as Research to Capture, Store Greenhouse Gases Expands The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will tap the talents of eight of its national laboratories as it expands its research into future ways to capture and store greenhouse gases. MORE INFO Carbon Sequestration Program. In the first of two major project selections the department expects to make this year in its carbon sequestration program, DOE said it will provide $7.7 million to the laboratories over the next three years to study innovations ranging from carbon dioxide filtering membranes to the development of "biofilms" made up of carbon-converting microorganisms. In seven of the eight projects, lab researchers will team with scientists

363

The Fleet DNA Project (Fact Sheet), NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (EERE)

Fleet DNA Project Fleet DNA Project aims to accelerate the evolution of advanced vehicle development and support the strategic deployment of market-ready technologies that reduce costs, fuel consumption, and emissions. At the heart of the Fleet DNA Project is a clearinghouse of medium- and heavy-duty commercial fleet transportation data for optimizing the design of advanced vehicle technologies or for selecting a given technology to invest in. Designed by the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory in partnership with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, this online tool will help vehicle manufacturers and fleets understand the broad operational range for many of today's commercial vehicle vocations. Transportation Data Now in the early stages of development, this bench-

364

Summary results of an assessment of research projects in the National Photovoltaics Program  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Office of Energy Research (OER) undertook an assessment of 115 research projects (listed in Appendix A) sponsored by the National Photovoltaics Program. The Program is located within the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EE). This report summarizes the results of that review. The Office of Solar Energy Conversion is responsible for the management of the National Photovoltaics Program. This program focuses on assisting US industry in development of fundamental technology to bring advanced photovoltaic energy systems to commercial use. The purpose of the assessment was to determine the following: (1) the quality of research of individual projects; (2) the impact of these individual projects on the mission of the program; and (3) the priority of future research opportunities.

NONE

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DllTEIU.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DllTEIU.llNATION DllTEIU.llNATION Page 1 0[2 RECIPIENT:Small Wind Certification Council STATE: CO PROJECT TITLE : Certifying the Penormance of Small Wind Turbines Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Sole Source Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-EEOOOO492 GF0-0000492-Q02 G0492 Based on my review ofthe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45 1.1A),1 have made the following delemtinafion: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A11 Techn ical advice and assistance to organizations A9 Information gatheri ng, analysis, and dissemi nation Rational for determination: Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national, state, and local organizations. Information gathering (including, bul not limited to. literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and

366

Work plan for the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project (IFDP) is to place former isotopes production facilities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in a safe, stable, and environmentally sound condition; suitable for an extended period of minimum surveillance and maintenance (S&M) and as quickly and economical as possible. Implementation and completion of the deactivation project will further reduce the risks to the environment and to public safety and health. Furthermore, completion of the project will result in significant S&M cost savings in future years. The IFDP work plan defines the project schedule, the cost estimate, and the technical approach for the project. A companion document, the IFDP management plan, has been prepared to document the project objectives, define organizational relationships and responsibilities, and outline the management control systems to be employed in the management of the project. The project has adopted the strategy of deactivating the simple facilities first, to reduce the scope of the project and to gain experience before addressing more difficult facilities. A decision support system is being developed to identify the activities that best promote the project mission and result in the largest cost savings. This work plan will be reviewed and revised annually. Deactivation of IFDP facilities was initiated in FY 1994 and will be completed in FY 1999. The schedule for deactivation of facilities is shown. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $36M. The costs are summarized. Upon completion of deactivation, annual S&M costs of these facilities will be reduced from the current level of $5M per year to less than $1M per year.

NONE

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

Work plan for the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project (IFDP) is to place former isotopes production facilities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in a safe, stable, and environmentally sound condition; suitable for an extended period of minimum surveillance and maintenance (S and M) and as quickly and economical as possible. Implementation and completion of the deactivation project will further reduce the risks to the environment and to public safety and health. Furthermore, completion of the project will result in significant S and M cost savings in future years. The IFDP work plan defines the project schedule, the cost estimate, and the technical approach for the project. A companion document, the EFDP management plan, has been prepared to document the project objectives, define organizational relationships and responsibilities, and outline the management control systems to be employed in the management of the project. The project has adopted the strategy of deactivating the simple facilities first, to reduce the scope of the project and to gain experience before addressing more difficult facilities. A decision support system is being developed to identify the activities that best promote the project mission and result in the largest cost savings. This work plan will be reviewed and revised annually. Deactivation of EFDP Facilities was initiated in FY 1994 and will be completed in FY 2000. The schedule for deactivation of facilities is shown. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $51M. The costs are summarized. Upon completion of deactivation, annual S and M costs of these facilities will be reduced from the current level of $5M per year to less than $1M per year.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

368

Idaho National Laboratory Ten-Year Site Plan Project Description Document  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the currently active and proposed infrastructure projects listed in Appendix B of the Idaho National Laboratory 2013-2022 Ten Year Site Plan (DOE/ID-11449). It was produced in accordance with Contract Data Requirements List I.06. The projects delineated in this document support infrastructure needs at INL's Research and Education Campus, Materials and Fuels Complex, Advanced Test Reactor Complex and the greater site-wide area. The projects provide critical infrastructure needed to meet current and future INL opereational and research needs. Execution of these projects will restore, rebuild, and revitalize INL's physical infrastructure; enhance program execution, and make a significant contribution toward reducing complex-wide deferred maintenance.

Not Listed

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

Idaho National Laboratory Ten-Year Site Plan Project Description Document  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the currently active and proposed infrastructure projects listed in Appendix B of the Idaho National Laboratory 2013-2022 Ten Year Site Plan (DOE/ID-11449). It was produced in accordance with Contract Data Requirements List I.06. The projects delineated in this document support infrastructure needs at INL's Research and Education Campus, Materials and Fuels Complex, Advanced Test Reactor Complex and the greater site-wide area. The projects provide critical infrastructure needed to meet current and future INL opereational and research needs. Execution of these projects will restore, rebuild, and revitalize INL's physical infrastructure; enhance program execution, and make a significant contribution toward reducing complex-wide deferred maintenance.

Not Listed

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

ProjectBrochure Manhattanville in West Harlem Installation of New Sewer and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Sewer Project Project Brochure Borough: Manhattan Project Description: New Storm and Combined StormProjectBrochure Manhattanville in West Harlem Installation of New Sewer and Upgrade of Combined/Sanitary Sewers Project Start: September 15, 2009 Tentative Project Completion: Spring 2011 Project Cost

Qian, Ning

371

Environmental assessment of the Environmental Restoration Project at Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico  

SciTech Connect

Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) is managed and operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by Sandia Corporation, a subsidiary of the Lockheed Martin Company. SNL/NM is located on land controlled by DOE within the boundaries of Kirtland Air Force Base (KAFB) in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The major responsibilities of SNL/NM are the support of national security and energy projects. This report provides an environmental assessment of proposed remedial action activities at the solid waste management units at SNL/NM. A risk assessment of health hazards is also discussed.

NONE

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

National Bioenergy Center, Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update, Winter 2011-2012 (Newsletter)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Winter 2011-2012 issue of the National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project quarterly update. Issue topics: 34th Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals; feasibility of NIR spectroscopy-based rapid feedstock reactive screening; demonstrating integrated pilot-scale biomass conversion. The Biochemical Process Integration Task focuses on integrating the processing steps in enzyme-based lignocellulose conversion technology. This project supports the U.S. Department of Energy's efforts to foster development, demonstration, and deployment of 'biochemical platform' biorefineries that economically produce ethanol or other fuels, as well as commodity sugars and a variety of other chemical products, from renewable lignocellulosic biomass.

Not Available

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

373

Space and Time Variations in Turbulence during the Manhattan Midtown 2005 Field Experiment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Manhattan Midtown-2005 field experiment (MID05) collected turbulence observations at 12 street-level sites (at 3-m height) and at 5 rooftop sites (at 220-m average height). The MID05 observations of 30-min averaged standard deviations of wind ...

S. R. Hanna; Y. Zhou

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Urnaium Processing Facility Project, June 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Y-12 National Security Complex Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project May 2011 June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Assessment of Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Results and Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 3

375

Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Project, April 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Project May 2011 April 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Independent Oversight Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Project Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Scope and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2

376

Assessment of Nuclear Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Urnaium Processing Facility Project, June 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Y-12 National Security Complex Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project May 2011 June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Assessment of Safety Culture at the Y-12 National Security Complex Uranium Processing Facility Project Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Results and Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 3

377

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERM1NATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETERM1NATION DETERM1NATION RECIPIENT:Morehead State University PROJECT TITLE : East Kentucky Bioenergy Capacity Assessment Project Page 1 of2 STATE: KY Funding Opportunity Announcement Number COP Procurement Instrument Number DE·EEOOO313Q NEPA Control Number cm Number GF()..1 ()...482 0 Ba.sed on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorb:ed under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy--efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assIstance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and stale

378

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETFIU.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETFIU.llNATION DETFIU.llNATION RECIPIENT:Battelie Memorial Institute Corporate PROJECT TITLE: Upgrading of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oil (Bio-oil) Page I of2 STATE: OH Funding Opportunity Announcement Numbe... PrO(:urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-OOOO342 DE-EE0004391 GFO-OOO4391-OO1 EE4391 Based on my Tt:view of the information concerning the proposed adion, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authori7.ed under DOE Order 4Sl.IA),1 bave made the (oUowing determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 83.6 Siting. construction (or modification), operation, and decommissioning of facilities for indoor bench-scale research projects and conventtonallaboratory operations (for example, preparation of d'lemlcal standards and sample analysIs):

379

US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DEI'ER1IllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEI'ER1IllNATION DEI'ER1IllNATION Page I of3 RECIPIENT:Verdant Power, Inc. STATE: NY PROJECT TITLE : Advancement of the Kinetic Hydropower System (KHPS) to DOE TRL 7/8 Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE-FOA-OOOO293 Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-EEOOO5929 GF0-0005929-OO1 EE5929 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APP .. :NDlX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination 83.6 S mall-scale research and development, laboratory o peratio ns, and pilot projects 83.16 Researc h activities in aquatic env ironments Information gathering (induding, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and audits),

380

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DErnu.nNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DErnu.nNATION DErnu.nNATION RECIPIENT:TX STATE ENERGY CONSERVATION OFFICE PROJECT TITLE: CITY OF LA FERIA-PLANT 1 -SOLAR PROJECT Page 1 of2 STATE: TX Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-OOOOOS2 DE-EEOOOO116 GFQ-OOOO116-024 EE116 Based on my Rview of the information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A). I have made Ibe following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation , and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as Utilities), and state

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Decontamination and decommissioning of the Experimental Boiling Water Reactor (EBWR): Project final report, Argonne National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The Final Report for the Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) of the Argonne National Laboratory - East (ANL-E) Experimental Boiling Water Reactor (EBWR) facility contains the descriptions and evaluations of the activities and the results of the EBWR D&D project. It provides the following information: (1) An overall description of the ANL-E site and EBWR facility. (2) The history of the EBWR facility. (3) A description of the D&D activities conducted during the EBWR project. (4) A summary of the final status of the facility, including the final and confirmation surveys. (5) A summary of the final cost, schedule, and personnel exposure associated with the project, including a summary of the total waste generated. This project report covers the entire EBWR D&D project, from the initiation of Phase I activities to final project closeout. After the confirmation survey, the EBWR facility was released as a {open_quotes}Radiologically Controlled Area,{close_quotes} noting residual elevated activity remains in inaccessible areas. However, exposure levels in accessible areas are at background levels. Personnel working in accessible areas do not need Radiation Work Permits, radiation monitors, or other radiological controls. Planned use for the containment structure is as an interim transuranic waste storage facility (after conversion).

Fellhauer, C.R.; Boing, L.E. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States); Aldana, J. [NES, Inc., Danbury, CT (United States)

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlVllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETERlVllNATION DETERlVllNATION RECIPIENT: Arizona Geological Survey PROJECT TITL.E: State Geological Survey Contributions to the National Geothermal Data System Page I of2 STATE: IN Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrumcot Number NEPA Control Number CID Number 2850 DE-EEOOO2650 GF().()()()2850-IN1 a Based on my review oftht infonnation concerning tbe proposed ac tion, as NEPA Compliance Officer (autborized under- DOE Order 451.IA), I bave made the following detennination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND N UMBER: Description: 8 3.1 Site characterization and env ironmental mo nit oring Site characterization and environmental monitoring (induding, but not limited to, siting, construction, modification, operation, and dismantlement and removal or otherwise proper dosure (such as of a well) of characterizatioo and monitoring devices,

383

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlVllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETERlVllNATION DETERlVllNATION RECIPIENT:VA Dept of Mines, Minerals and Energy PROJECT TITLE : EECBG * NEPA Template (T) Page lof2 STATE: VA Funding Opportunity Annou ncement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-OOOOO13 DE-EEOOOO864 0 Based on my review uribe information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.1A), I bave made the following detennination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A11 Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national, state, and local organizations. A9 Information gathering (including , but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits). data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply

384

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETFRMlNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETFRMlNATION DETFRMlNATION Page 1 of3 RECIPIENT :Arkansas Energy Office STATE : AR PROJECT TITLE : AEO-SEP-ANNUAL 2012 Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-OOOO643 DE-EEOOO3777 GFO-OOO3777-Q01 Based on my review ofthe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4SI.IA), I have made the fo!lowing dete ... mination : ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A11 Technical advice and assistance to organizations Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national, state, and local organizations. A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (induding, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and

385

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DFTFIU.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DFTFIU.llNATION DFTFIU.llNATION RECIPIENT:Oregon Stale University PROJECT TITLE: National Marine Renewable Energy Center Page I of3 STATE: OR Funding Opportunity Announcement Numbu Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-PSJ6.0SG098030 DE-FG36-08G018179.MOO2 GFO-G018179-003 G018179 Based on my review urlhe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Offien (authorized under DOE Order 4Sl.1A). I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but nollimiled 10, literature surveys, inventories, audits). data analysis (including ' oompuler modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply

386

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEIaillNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETEIaillNATION DETEIaillNATION RECIPIENT: Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs · Energy DivISion PROJECT TITLE: State Energy Program Annual PY12 (FY13) Pagelof4 STATE; AL Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-0000643 DE-EE0004122 GF0..Q004122--national state and local organizations Informatlon gathenng (includIng but not limIted to literature surveys Inventones site VISitS, and audits), data

387

Super cpRAD: 1663 Science and Technology Magazine | Los National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

been a remarkable boon to the nuclear weapons community, which, since the days of the Manhattan Project, has wanted to peer inside a detonated nuclear weapon and watch its...

388

Ed Westcott: Legacy in Black and White | Y-12 National Security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

| Y-12 Report | Volume 9, Issue 1 | 2012 Ed Westcott As the official photographer of the Manhattan Project, Ed Westcott took 15,000 photographs between 1942 and 1946. His images...

389

Sandia National Laboratories site-wide hydrogeologic characterization project calendar year 1992 annual report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM) Site-Wide Hydrogeologic Characterization (SWHC) project has been implemented as part of the SNL/NM Environmental Restoration (ER) Program to develop the regional hydrogeologic framework and baseline for the approximately 100 mi of Kirtland Air Force Base (KAFB) and adjacent withdrawn public lands upon which SNL/NM has performed research and development activities. Additionally, the SWHC project will investigate and characterize generic hydrogeologic issues associated with the 172 ER sites owned by SNL/NM across its facilities on KAFB. As called for in the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Part B permit agreement between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as the permitter and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and SNL/NM as the permittees, an annual report is to be prepared by the SWHC project team. This document serves two primary purposes: (1) to identify and describe the conceptual framework for the hydrogeologic system underlying SNL/NM and (2) to describe characterization activities undertaken in the preceding year that add to our understanding (reduce our uncertainties) regarding the conceptual and quantitative hydrogeologic framework. This SWHC project annual report focuses primarily on purpose 1, providing a summary description of the current {open_quotes}state of knowledge{close_quotes} of the Sandia National Laboratories/Kirtland Air Force Base (SNL/KAFB) hydrogeologic setting.

Crowson, D.; Gibson, J.D.; Haase, C.S.; Holt, R.; Hyndman, D.; Krumhansl, J.; Lauffer, F.; McCord, J.P.; McCord, J.T.; Neel, D. [and others

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

u.s. DEPARTIvIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEnllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTIvIENT OF ENERGY DEPARTIvIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEnllNATION RECIPIENT:State of North Carolina - Subrecipient Wilkes County PROJECT TITLE: Greenhouse Gas to Energy Project STATE: NC Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Conlrol Number em Number DE-EEOOOO771 0 Based on my review or the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4SI.IA), 1 have made tbe following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description : B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor roncentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

391

DEPARTMENT OF FNERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DI!TERJ.fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FNERGY FNERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DI!TERJ.fiNATION RECIPIENT:University of Minnesota Page 1 of2 STATE: MN PROJECT TITLE: Production and economics of perennial-based woody and herbaceous biomass crops under alley- cropping systems I"unding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number CDP G088073 GFO-G088073-033 0 Based on my review ofthe information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (autborized undu DOE Order 4SLIA), I have made the (ollowing determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 83.6 Siting, construction (or modification). operation, and decommissioning of facilities for indoor bench-scale research projects and conventional laboratory operations (for example, preparation of chemical standards and sample analysis);

392

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER Nl!PA DI!TFIU.nNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PARTh1l1NT OFI!NERGY PARTh1l1NT OFI!NERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER Nl!PA DI!TFIU.nNATION Page I of2 RECIPIENT: City of SI. Petersburg STATE: FL PROJECT TITLE: SI. Petersburg Solar Pilol Project (FL) FUnding Opportunity Announcement Number Procunml'nt Instrument Numbu NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-EEOOOO284 GF().OQ()()284-003 G0284 Based on my review ortbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized UDder DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the (ollowing determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 8 5.16 Sola r photovoltaic systems The installation, modification, operation, and removal of commercially available solar photovoltaic systems located on a building or other structure (such as rooftop, parking lot or facility, and mounted to Signage,

393

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DE1'ElUI.nNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dedham Dedham us. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DE1'ElUI.nNATION PROJECT TITLE: Dedham Municipal Solar Project Page 1 of2 STATE : MA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-EEOOO3163 DE-EEOOO3163 GF0-0003163-OQ1 0 Based OD my review oftbe information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (aulhoru.ed under DOE Order 451.1A), I ha ve made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply

394

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

.**.* :. .**.* :. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\llNATION RECIPIENT:General Motors lLC PROJECT TITLE; High-Activity Dealloyed Cathode Catalysts Page 1 of2 STATE: MI fo'unding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-P$3608G098009 EEOOOO458 GFO-10-332 EE458 Based on my review oflhe information concC'rning tbe proposed action, as N[PA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made tbe following determination: ex, ":A, EIS APP .. ;N DIX AND NUMBER: Description: 83.6 Siting. construction (or modification), operation, and decommissioning of facilities for indoor bench-scale research projects and conventional laboratory operations (for example, preparation of chemical standards and sample analysis):

395

US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EE RE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DI!TFRAfiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EE EE RE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DI!TFRAfiNATION RECIPIENT:State of louisiana - Department of Natural Resources PROJECT TITLE: ARRA State Energy Program - Grant Parish Transportation Project Page 1 of2 STATE: LA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-OOOOOS2 EEOOOO124 GF0-Q000124-020 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A),1 have made the following determination: CX, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.22 Alternative fuel vehicle fueling stations The installation, modification, operation, and removal of alternative fuel vehicle fueling stations (such as for compressed natural gas, hydrogen, ethanol and other commercially available biofuels) on the site of a

396

Project plan for the decontamination and decommissioning of the Argonne National Laboratory Experimental Boiling Water Reactor  

SciTech Connect

In 1956, the Experimental Boiling Water Reactor (EBWR) Facility was first operated at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) as a test reactor to demonstrate the feasibility of operating an integrated power plant using a direct cycle boiling water reactor as a heat source. In 1967, ANL permanently shut down the EBWR and placed it in dry lay-up. This project plan presents the schedule and organization for the decontamination and decommissioning of the EBWR Facility which will allow it to be reused by other ANL scientific research programs. The project total estimated cost is $14.3M and is projected to generate 22,000 cubic feet of low-level radioactive waste which will be disposed of at an approved DOE burial ground. 18 figs., 3 tabs.

Boing, L.E.

1989-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

397

A Process for Predicting Manhole Events in Manhattan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present a knowledge discovery and data mining process developed as part of the Columbia/Con Edison project on manhole event prediction. This process can assist with real-world prioritization problems that involve raw ...

Isaac, Delfina

398

A History of Classified Activities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The facilities that became Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) were created in 1943 during the United States' super-secret World War II project to construct an atomic bomb (the Manhattan Project). During World War II and for several years thereafter, essentially all ORNL activities were classified. Now, in 2000, essentially all ORNL activities are unclassified. The major purpose of this report is to provide a brief history of ORNL's major classified activities from 1943 until the present (September 2000). This report is expected to be useful to the ORNL Classification Officer and to ORNL's Authorized Derivative Classifiers and Authorized Derivative Declassifiers in their classification review of ORNL documents, especially those documents that date from the 1940s and 1950s.

Quist, A.S.

2001-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

399

2003 U.S. Department of Energy Strategic Plan: Protecting National, Energy, and Economic Security with Advanced Science and Technology and Ensuring Environmental Cleanup  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy contributes to the future of the Nation by ensuring energy security, maintaining the safety, security and reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile, cleaning up the environment from the legacy of the Cold War, and developing innovations in science and technology. After 25 years in existence, the Department now operates 24 preeminent research laboratories and facilities and four power marketing administrations, and manages the environmental cleanup from 50 years of nuclear defense activities that impacted two million acres in communities across the country. The Department has an annual budget of about $23 billion and employs about 14,500 Federal and 100,000 contractor employees. The Department of Energy is principally a national security agency and all of its missions flow from this core mission to support national security. That is true not just today, but throughout the history of the agency. The origins of the Department can be traced to the Manhattan Project and the race to develop the atomic bomb during World War II. Following the war, Congress engaged in a vigorous and contentious debate over civilian versus military control of the atom. The Atomic Energy Act of 1946 settled the debate by creating the Atomic Energy Commission, which took over the Manhattan Projects sprawling scientific and industrial complex.

None,

2003-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

400

Safe as mother's milk: the Hanford project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Safe As Mother's Milk: The Hanford Project is a web site and physical installation exploring the atomic history of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. For more than forty years, Hanford released radioactive materials into the environment on an uninformed ... Keywords: Hanford, Manhattan Project, cold war, documentary, education resource, plutonium, radiation

Kim Stringfellow

2003-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DI!TERJ.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DI!TERJ.llNATION DI!TERJ.llNATION RECIPIENT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Page 1 of2 STATE: MA PROJECT TITLE: Scalable High-Efficiency Thin-Crystalline Si CElls Enabled by Light-Trapping Nanostructures Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pr()(urement I.nstrument Number N[PA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-OOOO387 DE-EEOOO5320 GF0-0005320-OO1 0 Based on my review orlhe Information concerning the proposed action,.s NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized uDder- DOE Order 4SI.IA),1 have made tbe following deter-min.tion: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (induding, but not limited 10, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and audits). data analysis (including, but not limited to, oomputer modeling). document preparation (including, but not limited to, conceptual design,

402

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPADE=llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPADE=llNATION NEPADE=llNATION RECIPIENT:Cily of Birmingham PROJECT TITLE: Birmingham Rae Center GSHP Installation ARRA-EECBG Page I of2 STATE: AL Funding Opportunity Announcement Numbe... Procurementlnstrumen( Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE FOA 0000013 0 Based on my I'"Cview orthe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authori1.ed under DOE Order 451.1A).1 hne made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not Increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and state

403

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETFIU.fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETFIU.fiNATION DETFIU.fiNATION RECIPIENT: Slale of North Carolina· Subrecipient Scotland County PROJECT TITLE: Scotland County Methane to Energy Page 1 of2 STATE: NC Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE·EEQOOO771 0 Based on my review oflbe informalion concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.IA), I hne made the following detumination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy. demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency thai do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially hannful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and state

404

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DETElUllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETElUllNATION DETElUllNATION RECIPIENT: Delaware Division of Energy & Climate PROJECT TITLE: DE SEQ Sub Grantee/Bridgeville Well Pump Replacement Page 1 of2 STATE: DE Funding Opportunity Annoum::ement Number Proc:urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number eln Number DE-EEOOOO775 DE-EEOOOO775 GFO-OOOO775-OQS 0 Based OD my nview orlbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Offif:cr (authorized under DOE Order 45l. tA), I have mde tbe following determination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 8 5.1 Actions to conserve energy. demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

405

U.S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEIu.fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETEIu.fiNATION DETEIu.fiNATION Page 1 of3 RECIPIENT: NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE STATE: ND PROJECT TITLE: STATE ENERGY PROGRAM Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE-FOA-0000643 PJ'"()Currment Instrument Number NT43202 NEPA Control Number em Number GF0-0043202-OO1 Based on my Tt'view orthe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Offi(er (nthorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering, analYSis, and dissemination A11 Technical advice and assistance to organizations Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, Inventories, site visits, and audits). data analysis (including, but nol limited 10, computer modeling), document preparation (including, bul notlimitecl

406

u.s DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DFnru.nNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NFPA DFnru.nNATION NFPA DFnru.nNATION Page 1 of2 RECIPIENT:City of S1. Petersburg/Attn: JON PLUMB STATE: FL PROJECf TITLE : Solar Parks Project "unding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CIO Number COP DE·EEOOO0284 GFQ-0000284-OO5 GO Based on my review oflhe information conceming the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.16 Solar photovoltaic systems The installation, modification, operation, and removal of commercially available solar pholovoltaic systems located on a building or other structure (such as rooftop, parking lot or facility, and mounted to signage, lighting, gates, or fences), or if located on land, generally comprising less than 10 acres within a previously

407

U.S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DEIEIU.fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEIEIU.fiNATION DEIEIU.fiNATION RECIPIENT:American Samoa Territorial Energy Office PROJECT TITLE: Renewable Energy: Ground Mounted Photovoltaic Grid System Page 1 of2 STATE: AS Funding Opportunity Announ~tmeDt Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CIO Number DE-EEOOOO218 GF0-0000218-006 0 Based on my review oflhe information concerning tbe proposed attion, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A),1 h .... e made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to oonserve energy. demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency thai do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

408

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPADE~fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NFPADE~fiNATION NFPADE~fiNATION RECIPIENT :MTI Micro Fuel Cells Inc. Page I of2 STATE: NY PROJECT TITLE: Recovery Commercialization Effort for 1 Watt Consumer Electronics Power Pack Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number N[PA Control Number CIO Number DE-PS36-08G098009 EE0OOO477 GFO-09-12J.OO1 EEO Based on my uview orlhe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4Sl.IA). I have made the following determination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy. demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not Increase the Indoor concentratIOns of potentially hannful substances. These actions may involve financial and techmcal

409

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MAN AGEMENT CENTER NEPA DEl'ElallNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEl'ElallNATION DEl'ElallNATION RECIPIENT :County of San Maleo PROJECT TITLE; Energy Efficiency Analysis and Upgrade Program for County Facilities Page J of2 STATE: CA Funding Opportunity An nouncement Number DE-FOA 0000013 ProturemtntlnSfrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number o Based on my review orlbe information concerning tbe propostd action, 8 S NEPA Compliance Officer (authoru.ed under DOE O rder 4SI.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, US APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply and demand studies), and dissemination (induding, bul not limited 10, document mailings, publication, and distribution;

410

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPADETFllllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NFPADETFllllNATION NFPADETFllllNATION RECIPIENT:TX. STATE ENERGY CONSERVATION OFfiCE PROJECT TITLE: TEXAS A&M - CORPUS CHRISTI Page 1 of3 STATE: TX Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number N[PA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-OOOOO52 DE-EEOOO0116 GFQ-OOOO116-027 0 Based on my review oflhe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authori7'..ed under DOE Order 4Sl.IA), I have made the (ollowing determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.18 Wind turbines The installation, modification, operation, and removal of a small number (generally nol more than 2) of commercially available wmd turbmes, with a total height generally less than 200 feet (measured from the ground to the maximum height of blade

411

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETI!Rl\fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETI!Rl\fiNATION DETI!Rl\fiNATION RECIPIENT :Arizona Geological Survey PROJECT TITLE: USDOE NGDS II Page I of2 STATE: AZ Funding Opportunity Announcement NurnMr Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number- DE-FOA-OOOO109 DE·EEOOO2850 GF0-0002850-W11 G02850 Based on my ",view of the informalion concerning the propoud action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I bave made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 83.1 Onsite and offsite site characterization and environmental monitoring, including siting, construction (or modification), operation. and dismantlement or closing (abandonment) of characterization and monitoring devices and siting , construction, and associated operation of a small-scale laboratory building or renovation of a room In an existing bUIldIng

412

u.s. DEPARTUENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAG EMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\JlNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETERl\JlNATION DETERl\JlNATION Page 1 of2 ~ '~ . , . 'c. : . RECJI'JENT:Metro Nashville & Davidson County STATE: TN PROJECT TITLE: EECBG Program Nashville & Davidson Co., TN Building Retrofit & Miscellaneous (S) Funding Opportunity Annoum::tment Number DE·FOA.()()()13 Procurement Instrument Number EEOOOO956.001 NEPA Control Number cm Number o Based on my review of the information conctrning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authoriztd under DOE Order 4SI.IA). I have made the rollowing determination: CX, EA. EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy. demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy--efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

413

DEPARn.lliNT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEM ENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

·I.· ~I ·I.· ~I u.s. DEPARn.lliNT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEM ENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\llNATION RECIPIENT:City of Philadelphia. PA Page 1 01 L STATE: PA PROJEC.T TITLE: Philadelphia (PA): NovaThermal Energy - Waste Heat Geothermal Pilot Demonstratlon - EECBG - ARRA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number OE-FOA-OOOOO13 Procurement Instrument Number EE0000927 NEPA Control Number elD Number GF0-000Q927 -003 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4SI.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy. demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financia

414

T OF ENERG Y EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETE~llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTI\IEN DEPARTI\IEN T OF ENERG Y EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETE~llNATION RECIPIENT:lexington·Fayette Urnan County Govemment PROJECf TITLE: eeCBG Program Community Bike Project Page 1 of2 STATE: KY Funding Opportunity Announc:tment Number Proc:urtmtnt Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE· EEOOOO728.Q0 1 0 Bastd on my rtview of the information c:onc:erning the proposed ac:tion, as NEPA Complianc:e Offic:er (authorized under DOE Order 4SI.tA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

415

DEPARTMENT OF ENFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEIu.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENFRGY ENFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEIu.llNATION RECIPIENT:Montana Stale University PROJECf TITLE : Montana SioDiesellnitiative Page 1 of2 STATE: MT Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procuremenllnstrument Number NEPA Control Number CIO Number DE· EEOOO3136 GF0-0003136-002 EE3136 Based on my rrview of the infonnatlon conccming tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the (ollowlng determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 83.6 Siting , construction (or modification), operation, and decommissioning of facilities for indoor benen-scale research projects and conventional laboratory operations (for example, preparation of chemical standards and sample analysis):

416

. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlvllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlvllNATION RECIPIENT;State of North Carolina, Subrecipienl Town of Duck PROJECT TITLE: Town of Duck Town Hall Page 1 of2 STATE: NC Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-EEOOO0771 gfo-oooo771-o18 0 Based on my review of the information CODctJ"Ding tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUM.BER: Description: B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency thai do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

417

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlVllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AII.j)l) AII.j)l) u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlVllNATION RECIPIENT: HRL Laboratories, LLC PROJECT TITLE : Room Temperature Hydrogen Storage in Nano-confined liquids Page I of2 STATE: CA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number cm Number DE-FOA-0000421 EE0005659 GFO-OOO5659-001 0 BaRd on my review oftbe infonnation concerning the proposed action, as N[PA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451 .IA),1 han made tbe following detennination: CX, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMB[R: Description: A91nfonnatlon gathering, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (indudlng, but not limited to. literature sUNeys. Inventones, site visits, and audits), data analysIs

418

Transportation Energy Futures: Project Overview and Findings (Presentation), NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Transportation currently accounts for 71% of total U.S. petroleum use and 33% of the Transportation currently accounts for 71% of total U.S. petroleum use and 33% of the nation's total carbon emissions. Energy-efficient transportation strategies and renewable fuels have the potential to simultaneously reduce petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Transportation Energy Futures (TEF) project examines how a combination of multiple strategies could achieve deep reductions in petroleum use and GHG emissions. The project's primary objective is to help inform domestic decisions about transportation energy strategies, priorities, and investments, with an emphasis on underexplored opportunities related to energy efficiency

419

u.s. DEPARThffim OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETFRMlNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

.oi.'! , .oi.'! , u.s. DEPARThffim OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETFRMlNATION RECIPIENT:forrest County PROJECf TITLE: Forrest County Geothermal Energy Project Page 1 of3 STATE: MS Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pro<:urement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-EEOOOO116 DE-EEOOO2969 GF0-1Q.291 G02969 Based on my review of the information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A),1 have made the following determination : ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits). dala analysis (including oompuler modeling), document preparatIOn (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply

420

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DETTIUllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

u u :. u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DETTIUllNATION Page 1 00 R[CIPIENT:lIJinois Department of Commerce & Economic Opportunity STATE: IL PROJECT TITLE: Illinois Program Year 2012 State Enegy Program Formula Award Application Funding Opportunity Announ<:ement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-0000643 NT43162 GF0-0043162-001 Based on my review or the Information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order4SI.1A), I have made tbe following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A91nformation Information gathering (induding, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and audits), gathering, analysis, data analysis (including, but not limited to, computer modeling), document preparation (including

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

U.S. DEPARTIVIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\nNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTIVIENT OF ENERGY DEPARTIVIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERl\nNATION RECIPIENT: Lyondell Chemical Company Page I of3 STATE: TX PROJECT TITLE: Catalyst-Assisted Manufacture of Olefins from Natural Gas Liquids: Prototype Development and Full- Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-0560-2131 DE-EE0005754 GF0-0005754-001 G05754 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 45l.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and

422

DEPARTIlIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DI111!RJ.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTIlIENT OF ENERGY DEPARTIlIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DI111!RJ.llNATION Page I of2 RECIPIENT :The University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. STATE: GA PROJECT T ITLE; Development of bio-oil commodity fuel as a refinery feedstock from high impact algae biomass Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE·FOA-OOOO686 Pro<:unment Instrument Number DE-EE0006067 NEPA Control Number elD Number GF0-0006067 -001 EE6067 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451. 1A), I have made the follo wi ng determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDI X AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and

423

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETJ!R1..llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

tI .* tI .* ~1 u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETJ!R1..llNATION RECIPIENT:Cariisle Construction Materials Incorporated PROJECT TITLE: Extreme Balance of System Hardware Cost Reductions (BOS·X) Page 1 of2 STATE: PA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-0000493 OE-EEOOO5435 GFO-OOO543S-Q01 0 Based on my review orlhe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4SI.IA), I have made the (ollowing detennination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A91nformation gatheri ng, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (including, but nollimiled to, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and audits). data analysis

424

Renewable Energy Demonstration Project by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the General Services Administration  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT) requires the General Services Administration (GSA) to implement a solar energy program to demonstrate and evaluate the performance of available technologies expected to have widespread commercial application. The GSA decided to carry out the project at the Denver Federal Center because of its proximity to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The location was thought to be of mutual benefit to NREL and the GSA: it provides NREL an opportunity to deploy technology and it provides the GSA an opportunity to gain a hands-on learning experience with renewables. The GSA plans to document their experience and use it as a case study in part of a larger training effort on renewable energy. This paper describes the technology selection process and provides an update on the status of the project.

Carlisle, N; Hoo, E; Westby, R [National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (United States); Hancock, E [Ed Hancock and Associates, Boulder, CO (United States); Lu, J [General Services Administration, Washington, DC (United States)

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

Waste minimization value engineering workshop for the Los Alamos National Laboratory Omega West Reactor Decommissioning Project  

SciTech Connect

The Los Alamos National Laboratory Pollution Prevention Program Office sponsored a Value Engineering (VE) Workshop to evaluate recycling options and other pollution prevention and waste minimization (PP/WMin) practices to incorporate into the decommissioning of the Omega West Reactor (OWR) at the laboratory. The VE process is an organized, systematic approach for evaluating a process or design to identify cost saving opportunities, or in this application, waste reduction opportunities. This VE Workshop was a facilitated process that included a team of specialists in the areas of decontamination, decommissioning, PP/WMin, cost estimating, construction, waste management, recycling, Department of Energy representatives, and others. The uniqueness of this VE Workshop was that it used an interdisciplinary approach to focus on PP/WMin practices that could be included in the OWR Decommissioning Project Plans and specifications to provide waste reduction. This report discusses the VE workshop objectives, summarizes the OWR decommissioning project, and describes the VE workshop activities, results, and lessons learned.

Hartnett, S.; Seguin, N. [Benchmark Environmental Corp., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Burns, M. [Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States)

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

426

DFPARThIFN'I OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DI!rnu.nNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DFPARThIFN'I OF ENERGY DFPARThIFN'I OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DI!rnu.nNATION RECIPIENT:Kansas Corporation Commission - Renewable Energy Subgrant PROJECT T ITLE : City of Chanute GSHP Page 1 of2 STATE; KS Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pr~urement Instr ument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number $E·FOA.{)()(X)()13 EEOOOO727 GF0-0000727-010 0 Based on my review o(tbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Onter 4SI.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency thai do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

427

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETElUvllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OIAl) OIAl) u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETElUvllNATION RECIPIENT: NREL PROJECT TITLE : Los Tomales Meteorological Tower; NREL Tracking No. 11 ·009 Page I of2 STATE: TX Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number NREL-11-009 G010337 Based on my u"iew or the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized UDdtl'" DOE Order 451.IA). I have made tbe following determination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited 10, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply

428

Visualization of manhole and precursor-type events for the Manhattan electrical distribution system  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We present a visualization framework for analyzing the Consolidated Edison Company of New York (Con Edison) trouble tickets for the Manhattan electrical distribution system. The Con Edison Emergency Control System (ECS) is a work management tool that documents all events that occur in the electrical distribution system. The trouble ticket generated from ECS is a record of an event affecting the secondary (low-voltage) electrical distribution system, such as a manhole fire, manhole explosion, smoking manhole, no-light event, flickering light event, side-off partial outage, or burnout. The visualization tool outlined here is used alongside our preliminary statistical and machine learning work for predicting future manhole events. ECS tickets stored in our PostgreSQL database are displayed using Google Earths satellite images of Manhattan as a backdrop. The ability of this tool to display events relative to the surrounding buildings has already yielded some highly promising directions for our ongoing analysis.

Haimonti Dutta; Cynthia Rudin; Becky Passonneau; Fred Seibel; Axinia Radeva; Zhi An Liu; Steve Ierome; Delfina Isaac

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

ABOUT Y-12 The Y-12 National Security Complex, in Oak Ridge,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ABOUT Y-12 ABOUT Y-12 The Y-12 National Security Complex, in Oak Ridge, Tenn., has been a symbol of national strength and global security for 70 years. Originally part of the Manhattan Project, Y-12 was constructed to enrich uranium for an atomic weapon to end World War II. Our distinct purpose from day one has been to make the world safer. Today, we have three missions: maintaining the safety, security and effectiveness of the United States' nuclear weapons stockpile; providing safe and effective nuclear propulsion systems for the U.S. Navy; and reducing the global threat posed by nuclear proliferation and terrorism. As an enduring national asset, Y-12 consistently provides the most responsive, innovative and cost- effective solutions to meet our missions for the

430

Audit of Renovation and New Construction Projects at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, WR-B-97-06  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

THE SECRETARY THE SECRETARY FROM: John C. Layton Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of Renovation and New Construction Projects at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory must periodically renovate existing facilities or build new ones to accomplish its missions or to provide infrastructure to support its missions. The objective of the audit was to determine if Livermore's proposed renovation and new construction projects met mission needs while minimizing the cost to the Government. DISCUSSION: In pursuing three projects, estimated to cost over $78 million, Livermore had not demonstrated that it had selected the

431

A holistic approach to human presence detection on man- portable military ground robots  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Manhattan Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Resources. The manhattan project: An interactive history [A Real Example: The Manhattan Project The gap between

Birchmore, Frederick Christopher

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Major Modification Determination Process Utilized for Proposed Idaho National Laboratory Projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Over the past three years, several new projects with the potential for major modifications to existing facilities have been considered for implementation at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). These projects were designated to take place in existing nuclear facilities with existing documented safety analyses. 10 CFR 830.206 requires the contractor for a major modification to a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 nuclear facility to obtain Department of Energy (DOE) approval for the nuclear facility design criteria to be used for preparation of a preliminary documented safety analysis (PDSA), as well as creation and approval of the PDSA, before the contractor can procure materials or components or begin construction on the project. Given the significant effort and expense of preparation and approval of a PDSA, a major modification determination for new projects is warranted to determine if the rigorous requirements of a major modification are actually required. Furthermore, performing a major modification determination helps to ensure that important safety aspects of a project are appropriately considered prior to modification construction or equipment procurement. The projects considered for major modification status at the INL included: treatment and packaging of unirradiated, sodium-bonded highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel and miscellaneous casting scrap in the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) Fuel Manufacturing Facility (FMF); post irradiation examination of Advance Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI) fuel in the MFC Analytical Laboratory (AL); the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) gas test loop (GTL); and the hydraulic shuttle irradiation system (HSIS) at ATR. The major modification determinations for three of the proposed projects resulted in a negative major modification. On the other hand, the major modification determination for the GTL project concluded that the project would require a major modification. This paper discusses the process, methods, and considerations used by the INL for the four major modification determinations. Three of the four major modification determinations discussed herein were completed using the guidance specified in the draft of DOE STD-1189, Integration of Safety into the Design Process. DOE-STD-1189 was released as a draft document in March 2007 and provides guidance for integrating safety considerations into the early design activities for constructing new facilities or making modifications to existing nuclear facilities. The fourth major modification determination was prepared prior to the existence of DOE STD-1189 and was evaluated solely by the definition of a major modification given in 10 CFR 830.206. For all four projects, consideration was given to: Facility hazard categorization change and material inventory Facility footprint change with the potential to adversely affect credited safety function New or changed processes resulting in a change to the safety basis The use of new technology or equipment not approved for use in the facility The need for new or revised safety basis controls Hazards not previously evaluated in the safety basis.

Michael A. Lehto, Ph.D.; Boyd D. Christensen

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

433

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETnu.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

"i"! ) "i"! ) u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETnu.llNATION RECIPU:NT: Battelie Memoriallnstilute PROJECf TITLE: Stationary Fuel Cell System Cost Analysis Page 1 of2 STATE : OH I·unding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA..()()()()420 EEOOO5250 GF0-000525CHX)1 0 Based on my review or the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Offker (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.IA), I have made the (ollowlng determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including , but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories. audits). data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply and

434

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DI!TFRAfiNATION RECIPIENT:Vennonl Sustainable Jobs Fund  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTIllI!NT OFI!NERGY DEPARTIllI!NT OFI!NERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DI!TFRAfiNATION RECIPIENT:Vennonl Sustainable Jobs Fund PROJECf TITLE: Vermont Biofuels Initiative: Renewable Energy Resources CDP-09 Page 1 of2 STATE: VT Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Conlrol Number em Number DE-FG36-08GOBB182 GFD-G088182-026 0 Based on my review oflbe information concerning Ihe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (aulhori:r.ed under DOE Order451.1A), I have made the (ollowlng determination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX A1\'D NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

435

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EE RE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPADETERlvllNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EE EE RE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPADETERlvllNATION Page 1 of2 R[CIPIENT;PolyPlus Battery Company STATE: CA PROJECf TITLE: Manufactunng of Protected lithium Electrodes for Advanced li-Air, Li·Water and U-S Batteries "' unding Opportunity Announcement Numbt-r Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number DE-FOA-00056O DE-EEOOOS757 GF0-0005757 -001 G05757 Based on my review orthe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Complia nce Officer (authorized under OOE Order45I.1A).1 have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (indudlng, but not limited to, literature surveys Inventones, site VISits and audits). data analYSIS (induding, but not limited to, computer modeling)

436

us. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CDITER NFPA DETElUfiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CDITER NFPA DETElUfiNATION RECIPIENT:Town of Brookston PROJE(.T TITLE: Brookston Wind Turbine Page 1 of2 STATE: IN funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procuremenllnstrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Numbu N/A (COP) DE-EEOOO3262 GFo..ooo3262.()()1 EE3262 Based on my review orlhc information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4S1.IA),1 have made the rollowing detennination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, invenlories, audits), data analysis (including computet modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply

437

U.S DEPARTMFNT OFFNFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DF1'ERl\nNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMFNT OFFNFRGY DEPARTMFNT OFFNFRGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DF1'ERl\nNATION Page I of2 RECIPI[NT:Hawaii Renewable Energy Development Venture (PtCHTR) STATE: HI PROJECf TITLE: Sopogy subcontract funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procuremenllnstrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number G088146 GFO-G08814&-OO7 G088146 Based on my rt'view orlbe information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order451.1A), I bne made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information Information gathering (including , but nollimiled la, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and gathering, analYSiS, and audits). data analysis (including , but not limited la, computer modeling), document preparation

438

EERE PROJECT MAN AGEM ENT CENT ER NEPA DETEIU.IlNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

p-, ** p-, ** ~ , u.s DEPARTMENT OFENFRGY EERE PROJECT MAN AGEM ENT CENT ER NEPA DETEIU.IlNATION RECIPIENT:Simpson College; a SEP ARRA sub-recipient of the Iowa Economic Development Authority PROJECf TITLE: Simpson College Boiler Plant De-Centralization Page 1 of3 STATE: lA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE-FOA-OOOOO52 Procurement Instrument Number DE-EEOOOO162 NEPA Control Number em Number GF0-0000162-020 EE162 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed aelion, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 (a) Actions to conserve energy or water, demonstrate potential energy or water conservation, and promote energy

439

U.S. DEPARTIHENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DE~llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

aUl aUl , U.S. DEPARTIHENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DE~llNATION RECIPIENT: Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc. PROJECf TITLE: Hyundai FCEV Testing, Data Collection and Validation Fleet Page 1 of2 STATE: MI Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Pn)Curernent Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA-000062S DE-EEOOO5970 GFO-OO05970-OO1 G05970 Based on my review ortbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination Information gathering (including, but not limited 10, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and

440

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MA,'MGEMENT CENTER NEPADETEru.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

'MGEMENT CENTER 'MGEMENT CENTER NEPADETEru.llNATION RECIPIENT: lnstitute for Sustainable Communities PROJECT TITLE : Intemationallndustrial Energy Efficiency Training and Deployment (lIEETD) Page 1 of2 STATE: VT Funding Opportunity Announcement Number PNKunment Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-OOOO531 OE-EEOOO5305 GF0-0005305-001 0 Based on my review of tbe information concerning tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (autborized undel'" DOE Order 4S1.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including , but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits). data analysis (including computer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies. analytical energy supply

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

U.S. DEPARTMENT OFFNERG1' EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DFTFIU.fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFNERG1' OFFNERG1' EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DFTFIU.fiNATION RECIPIENT:Texas Tech University Page I of3 STATE: TX PROJECf TITLE : Midsize wind turbine designed and manufactured in the USA (BUDGET PERIOD 1) Funding Opportunity Announc:emtnt Number Procurementlostruml'Dt Number NEPA Control Number elO Number DE-FOA-OOOO327 DE-EE0004415 GF().{)()()4415..()()1 0 Based on my review orthe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authoro.ed under DOE Order 451.1A),1 have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but nol limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including oomputer modeling), document preparation (such as conceptual design or feasibility studies, analytical energy supply and

442

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DEl'ERlIfiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

"U! l "U! l u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DEl'ERlIfiNATION Page I of3 RECIPIENT: lllinois Department of Commerce & Economic Opportunity STATE: IL PROJECf TITLE : 2012 Illinois State Energy Program Formula Award - Modification Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE-FOA-0000643 Procurement Instrument Number DE-FG-26-07NT 43162 NEPA Control Number em Number GFO-NT43152-Q01 Based on my review oflhl' information concerning 'he proposed actioD, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized undu DOE Order4S1.1A),1 have made tbe following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Infannation gathering, analYSiS, and dissemination Al1 Technical advice and assistance to organizations Information gathering (including, but nollimiled \0, literature surveys, inventories, site visits, and audits). data

443

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DF1'l!Rl>llNATION RrCIPIENT:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEP * .\RThIFNT OF FNERGY DEP * .\RThIFNT OF FNERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DF1'l!Rl>llNATION RrCIPIENT: Michigan Energy Office PROJECf TITLE: EERE loanITech Demo Program - Delphi Page 1 of2 STATE: MI Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-FOA'{)()()()()S2 DE-EEOOOO166 GF()-(HX)()116-023 GOO Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Offictr (authorized under DOE Order 45I.lA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUM.BER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy. demonstrate potential energy conservation , and promote energy-efficiency that do nol increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

444

EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CDITER Nl!PA Dl!Tl!Rl\llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

... ... ~ . u.s DEPAR lENT OFl!NERG' EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CDITER Nl!PA Dl!Tl!Rl\llNATION Page 1 of2 RECIPIENT:Stanford University STATE: CA PROJECf TITLE: In·Situ X·Ray Analysis of Rapid Thermal Processing for Thin·FiI Solar Cells: Closing the Gap between Production and Laboratory Efficiency Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE·FOA-0000654 Procurement Instrument Number DE·EE0005951 NEPA Control Number em Number GFQ-0005951·001 G05951 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4SI.IA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APP~:NDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering, analysis, and dissemination 81.31 Installation or

445

Manhattan Project: The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Oak Ridge THE URANIUM PATH TO THE BOMB Alpha Racetrack, Y-12 Electromagnetic Plant, Oak Ridge THE URANIUM PATH TO THE BOMB (1942-1944) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 The uranium path to the atomic bomb ran through Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Only if the new plants built at Oak Ridge produced enough enriched uranium-235 would a uranium bomb be possible. General Groves placed two methods into production: 1) electromagnetic, based on the principle that charged particles of the lighter isotope would be deflected more when passing through a magnetic field; and 2) gaseous diffusion, based on the principle that molecules of the lighter isotope, uranium-235, would pass more readily through a porous barrier. Full-scale electromagnetic and gaseous diffusion production plants were built at Oak Ridge at sites designated as "Y-12" and "K-25", respectively.

446

Manhattan Project: Final Approval to Build the Bomb, Washington, D.C.,  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

President Roosevelt signs declaration of war with Japan, December 8, 1941. FINAL APPROVAL TO BUILD THE BOMB President Roosevelt signs declaration of war with Japan, December 8, 1941. FINAL APPROVAL TO BUILD THE BOMB (Washington, D.C., December 1942) Events > Difficult Choices, 1942 More Uranium Research, 1942 More Piles and Plutonium, 1942 Enter the Army, 1942 Groves and the MED, 1942 Picking Horses, November 1942 Final Approval to Build the Bomb, December 1942 Anxious as he was to get moving, Leslie Groves decided to make one final quality control check. On November 18, 1942, Groves appointed Warren K. Lewis of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to head a final review committee, comprised of himself and three DuPont representatives. During the final two weeks of November, the committee traveled from New York to Chicago to Berkeley and back again through Chicago. It endorsed the work on gaseous diffusion at Columbia, though it made some organizational recommendations; in fact, the Lewis committee advocated elevating gaseous diffusion to first priority and expressed reservations about the electromagnetic program despite an impassioned presentation by Ernest Lawrence in Berkeley. Upon returning to Chicago, Crawford H. Greenewalt, a member of the Lewis committee, was present at Stagg Field when CP-1 (Chicago Pile #1) first went critical. (For more on CP-1, skip ahead to "Early Pile Design, 1942.") Significant as this moment was in the history of physics, it came after the Lewis committee endorsed moving piles to the pilot stage and one day after Groves instructed DuPont to move into pile design and construction.

447

Manhattan Project: The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Painting of CP-1 going critical THE PLUTONIUM PATH TO THE BOMB Painting of CP-1 going critical THE PLUTONIUM PATH TO THE BOMB (1942-1944) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 Plutonium, produced in a uranium-fueled reactor (pile), was the second path taken toward achieving an atomic bomb. Design work on a full-scale plutonium production reactor began at the Met Lab in June 1942. Scientists at the Met Lab had the technical expertise to design a production pile, but construction and management on an industrial scale required an outside contractor. General Groves convinced the DuPont Corporation to become the primary contractor for plutonium production. With input from the Met Lab and DuPont, Groves selected a site at Hanford, Washington, on the Columbia River, to build the full-scale production reactors.

448

Manhattan Project: Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge WORKING K-25 INTO THE MIX K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge WORKING K-25 INTO THE MIX (Oak Ridge: Clinton, 1943-1944) Events > The Uranium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Y-12: Design, 1942-1943 Y-12: Construction, 1943 Y-12: Operation, 1943-1944 Working K-25 into the Mix, 1943-1944 The Navy and Thermal Diffusion, 1944 In 1941 and 1942, gaseous diffusion had been considered by many as the most promising method of enriching uranium. The British in the influential 1941 MAUD Report had advocated the use of gaseous diffusion alone, and the 1942 Lewis committee placed it first among isotope separation methods. Despite the soundness of the theory, the process had yet to produce any samples of enriched uranium when the K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant was authorized in late 1942.

449

Manhattan Project: Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Schematic of the X-10 Graphite Reactor, Oak Ridge FINAL REACTOR DESIGN AND X-10 Schematic of the X-10 Graphite Reactor, Oak Ridge FINAL REACTOR DESIGN AND X-10 (Met Lab and Oak Ridge [Clinton], 1942-1943) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 Before any plutonium could be chemically separated from uranium for a bomb, however, that uranium would first have to be irradiated in a production pile. CP-1 had been a success as a scientific experiment, but the pile was built on such a small scale that recovering any significant amounts of plutonium from it was impractical. In the fall of 1942, scientists of the Met Lab had decided to build a second Fermi pile at Argonne as soon as his experiments on the first were completed and to proceed with the "Mae West" design for a helium-cooled production pile as well. When DuPont engineers assessed the Met Lab's plans in the late fall, they agreed that helium should be given first priority. They placed heavy water second and urged an all-out effort to produce more of this highly effective moderator. Bismuth and water were ranked third and fourth in DuPont's analysis. Priorities began to change when Enrico Fermi's CP-1 calculations demonstrated a higher value for the neutron reproduction factor k (for a theoretical reactor of infinite size) than anyone had anticipated. Met Lab scientists concluded that a water-cooled pile was now feasible. Crawford Greenewalt, head of the DuPont effort, continued, however, to support helium cooling.

450

Manhattan Project: Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, Met Lab, 1942-1944  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Glenn T. Seaborg looks through a microscope at the world's first sample of pure plutonium, Met Lab, August 20, 1942. SEABORG AND PLUTONIUM CHEMISTRY Glenn T. Seaborg looks through a microscope at the world's first sample of pure plutonium, Met Lab, August 20, 1942. SEABORG AND PLUTONIUM CHEMISTRY (Met Lab, 1942-1944) Events > The Plutonium Path to the Bomb, 1942-1944 Production Reactor (Pile) Design, 1942 DuPont and Hanford, 1942 CP-1 Goes Critical, December 2, 1942 Seaborg and Plutonium Chemistry, 1942-1944 Final Reactor Design and X-10, 1942-1943 Hanford Becomes Operational, 1943-1944 While the Met Lab labored to make headway on pile (reactor) design, Glenn T. Seaborg (right) and his coworkers were trying to learn enough about transuranium chemistry to ensure that plutonium could be chemically separated from the uranium that would be irradiated in a production pile. Using lanthanum fluoride as a carrier, Seaborg isolated a weighable sample of plutonium in August 1942. At the same time, Isadore Perlman and William J. Knox explored the peroxide method of separation; John E. Willard studied various materials to determine which best adsorbed (gathered on its surface) plutonium; Theodore T. Magel and Daniel K. Koshland, Jr., researched solvent-extraction processes; and Harrison S. Brown and Orville F. Hill performed experiments into volatility reactions. Basic research on plutonium's chemistry continued as did work on radiation and fission products.

451

Y-12 and the National Park Service study, part 2 -- Or: Manhattan...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

28, 2010, cited the Society of Nuclear Medicine as the source of information that Technetium-99 the decay product of Molybdenum-99 is a critical medical isotope used in more...

452

Project Management Plan for the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Experimental Test Program  

SciTech Connect

EG&G Idaho, Inc. and Argonne National Laboratory-West (ANL-W) are participating in the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory`s (INEL`s) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Experimental Test Program (WETP). The purpose of the INEL WET is to provide chemical, physical, and radiochemical data on transuranic (TRU) waste to be stored at WIPP. The waste characterization data collected will be used to support the WIPP Performance Assessment (PA), development of the disposal No-Migration Variance Petition (NMVP), and to support the WIPP disposal decision. The PA is an analysis required by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Part 191 (40 CFR 191), which identifies the processes and events that may affect the disposal system (WIPP) and examines the effects of those processes and events on the performance of WIPP. A NMVP is required for the WIPP by 40 CFR 268 in order to dispose of land disposal restriction (LDR) mixed TRU waste in WIPP. It is anticipated that the detailed Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) waste characterization data of all INEL retrievably-stored TRU waste to be stored in WIPP will be required for the NMVP. Waste characterization requirements for PA and RCRA may not necessarily be identical. Waste characterization requirements for the PA will be defined by Sandia National Laboratories. The requirements for RCRA are defined in 40 CFR 268, WIPP RCRA Part B Application Waste Analysis Plan (WAP), and WIPP Waste Characterization Program Plan (WWCP). This Project Management Plan (PMP) addresses only the characterization of the contact handled (CH) TRU waste at the INEL. This document will address all work in which EG&G Idaho is responsible concerning the INEL WETP. Even though EG&G Idaho has no responsibility for the work that ANL-W is performing, EG&G Idaho will keep a current status and provide a project coordination effort with ANL-W to ensure that the INEL, as a whole, is effectively and efficiently completing the requirements for WETP.

Connolly, M.J.; Sayer, D.L.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Recycled Uranium Mass Balance Project Y-12 National Security Complex Site Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report has been prepared to summarize the findings of the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12 Complex) Mass Balance Project and to support preparation of associated U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) site reports. The project was conducted in support of DOE efforts to assess the potential for health and environmental issues resulting from the presence of transuranic (TRU) elements and fission products in recycled uranium (RU) processed by DOE and its predecessor agencies. The United States government used uranium in fission reactors to produce plutonium and tritium for nuclear weapons production. Because uranium was considered scarce relative to demand when these operations began almost 50 years ago, the spent fuel from U.S. fission reactors was processed to recover uranium for recycling. The estimated mass balance for highly enriched RU, which is of most concern for worker exposure and is the primary focus of this project, is summarized in a table. A discrepancy in the mass balance between receipts and shipments (plus inventory and waste) reflects an inability to precisely distinguish between RU and non-RU shipments and receipts involving the Y-12 Complex and Savannah River. Shipments of fresh fuel (non-RU) and sweetener (also non-RU) were made from the Y-12 Complex to Savannah River along with RU shipments. The only way to distinguish between these RU and non-RU streams using available records is by enrichment level. Shipments of {le}90% enrichment were assumed to be RU. Shipments of >90% enrichment were assumed to be non-RU fresh fuel or sweetener. This methodology using enrichment level to distinguish between RU and non-RU results in good estimates of RU flows that are reasonably consistent with Savannah River estimates. Although this is the best available means of distinguishing RU streams, this method does leave a difference of approximately 17.3 MTU between receipts and shipments. Slightly depleted RU streams received by the Y-12 Complex from ORGDP and PGDP are believed to have been returned to the shipping site or disposed of as waste on the Oak Ridge Reservation. No evidence of Y-12 Complex processing of this material was identified in the historical records reviewed by the Project Team.

NONE

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Geomaterials Research Project The Evolution of Generic Material Standards for  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Geomaterials Research Project The Evolution of Generic Material Standards for Block Manhattan College School of Engineering Civil and Environmental Engineering Department Bronx, New York, U.S.A. May 2012 #12;ii Geomaterials Research Project The Evolution of Generic Material Standards for Block

Horvath, John S.

455

Infrastructural Optimism  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Contemporary projects like Manhattans High Line perpetuateLower Manhattan. 14 The Street The Pink Project, initiated

Samuels, Linda C.

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

456

PROJECT-SPECIFIC TYPE A VERIFICATION FOR THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REMOVAL PHASE 3 TRENCH 5, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY UPTON, NEW YORK  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

5098-SR-04-0 PROJECT-SPECIFIC TYPE A VERIFICATION FOR THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REMOVAL PHASE 3 TRENCH 5, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

P.C. Weaver

2010-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

457

PROJECT-SPECIFIC TYPE A VERIFICATION FOR THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REMOVAL PHASE 3 TRENCH 1, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY UPTON, NEW YORK  

SciTech Connect

5098-SR-05-0 PROJECT-SPECIFIC TYPE A VERIFICATION FOR THE HIGH FLUX BEAM REACTOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REMOVAL PHASE 3 TRENCH 1 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

E.M. Harpenau

2010-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

458

Review of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project, September 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Facility Centered Assessment of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Results .................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 7

459

Review of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project, September 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Facility Centered Assessment of the Facility Centered Assessment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Disposition Project September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Results .................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 7

460

Environmental Assessment for the Oak Ridge Science and Technology Project at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81(E)/020508 81(E)/020508 DOE/EA-1575 Environmental Assessment for the Oak Ridge Science and Technology Project at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee February 2008 U. S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Office 06-281(E)/020508 iii CONTENTS FIGURES.....................................................................................................................................................iv TABLES ......................................................................................................................................................iv ACRONYMS................................................................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manhattan project national" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #17, October-December 2007  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

October to December, 2007 edition of the newsletter of the Biochemical Platform Process Integration project.

Schell, D.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER N1!PA Dl!1'ElU.llNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

N1!PA Dl!1'ElU.llNATION N1!PA Dl!1'ElU.llNATION RECIPIENT:City of Perth Amboy PROJECT TITLE : Municipal Complex Solar Power Project Page 1 of2 STATE: NJ Funding Opportunity Announl::ement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number Congressionally Directed Project DE· EEOOO3172 GF0-0003172..Q01 EE3172 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as N[PA Compliance Officer (authoro.ed under DOE Order451.1A),1 have made tbe following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 8 5.1 Adions to oonserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentratIOns of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

463

U.S. DEPARTlIIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETnu.fiNATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETnu.fiNATION DETnu.fiNATION RECIPIENT:Clemson University PROJECf TITLE: BioEthanol Collaborative Page 1 of2 STATE: SC Funding Opportunity Announ~ement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number elD Number COP DE-FG36-08G088071 GFQ.08-140b GOO Based on my review oftbe information ~onc:erniDg tbe proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A). I hne made the following deter-mination : ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 8 3.6 Siting, construction (or modification), operation, and decommissioning of facilities for indoor bench-scale research projects and conventional laboratory operations (for example, preparation of chemical standards and sample analysis); small-scale research and development projects; and small-scale pilot projects (generally less than two years) conducted

464

What Working on this Project Meant to Me from the Karns High School English II Honors Class 2006  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

this project including that Oak Ridge started as a key site of the Manhattan Project.It was great#12;What Working on this Project Meant to Me from the Karns High School English II Honors Class. Thishasbeenagreat experienceforme. ­BrookeMercer This was a rewarding and informative project. I had no idea how

465

CMSC 475/675 Introduction to Neural Networks Fall 2011 Project 2 Assignment  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CMSC 475/675 Introduction to Neural Networks Fall 2011 Project 2 Assignment This project assignment') is their Manhattan distance. For example, the distance between (1, 2) and (2, 2) is 1, between (1, 2) and (2, 1) is 2 vectors on the 3 by 3 output grid. You can use any language for this project. Report Besides

Peng, Yun

466

Project due (before) Wednesday, April 13 (5 pm) Two to three pages of write-up  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Project Project due (before) Wednesday, April 13 (5 pm) Two to three pages of write often as informative other methods of unsupervised learning include projection methods "classification measure Dii = p j=1 |xij - xi j| manhattan Dii = p j=1 |xij - xi j| |xij + xi j| Canberra STA 450/4000 S

Reid, Nancy

467

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #13, October-December 2006  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Volume 13 of a quarterly newsletter that describes the activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Processing Integration Task.

Schell, D. J.

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

468

National Bioenergy Center Biochemical Platform Integration Project: Quarterly Update #14, January - March 2007  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Volume 14 of a quarterly newsletter that describes the activities of the National Bioenergy Center's Biochemical Processing Integration Task.

Schell, D.

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

ICPP injection well alternative project, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Final report  

SciTech Connect

The Idaho Chemical Processing Plant (ICPP) portion of the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) has been obtaining water needed for its operations from the Snake River aquifer, which occupies the entire region underlying the site. Most of this water has been used for cooling operating equipment, while a small portion has found various process uses. After passing through the ICPP process area, these waters are then returned to the aquifer. A small portion (about 1%) of the returned stream contains measurable amounts of radioactivity derived from the miscellaneous process users. This report and the recommendations contained herein are based upon stream flows projected for 1985 as supplied by DOE for the ICPP. 26 different alternatives for handling cooling water, chemical, and low level radioactive water disposal are examined. These cases are considered from technical, environmental, safety, and economic points of view. The level of detail is sufficient to eliminate non-viable cases, and to identify those which offer improvements over present practice. The Environmental/Safety Risk Factors were evaluated on a qualitative comparison basis only. Before a recommended improvement is incorporated into the waste disposal system, a conceptual design study should be made which would evaluate all those secondary effects and environmental factors that, by the very nature of the screening process, this study has not provided. Certain synergistic combinations have been noted and are discussed. This report do