Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Thermal management in heavy vehicles : a review identifying issues and research requirements.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Thermal management in heavy vehicles is cross-cutting because it directly or indirectly affects engine performance, fuel economy, safety and reliability, engine/component life, driver comfort, materials selection, emissions, maintenance, and aerodynamics. It follows that thermal management is critical to the design of large (class 6-8) trucks, especially in optimizing for energy efficiency and emissions reduction. Heat rejection requirements are expected to increase, and it is industry's goal to develop new, innovative, high-performance cooling systems that occupy less space and are lightweight and cost-competitive. The state of the art in heavy vehicle thermal management is reviewed, and issues and research areas are identified.

Wambsganss, M. W.

1999-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

2

Business System Management Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

P-004 Business System Management Review Process 11_0304Page 1 of 7 P-004 Business System Management Review Process 11_0304Page 1 of 7 EOTA - Business Process Document Title: Business System Management Review Process Document Number: P-004 Rev 11_0304 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: Q-001, Quality Manual Notify of Changes: EOTA Employees Referenced Document(s): F-009, Business System Management Review Template P-004 Business System Management Review Process 11_0304Page 2 of 7 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 08_0414 Corrective Actions, Preventive Actions, and Improvement Opportunity 09_1124 Edited document for clarity and to better fit the process in use. Added requirement to provide management with

3

ORISE: Peer Review Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Management Man participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) ensures that scientific reviews are conducted in a professional manner and...

4

LEGACY MANAGEMENT REQUIRES INFORMATION  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

''Legacy Management Requires Information'' describes the goal(s) of the US Department of Energy's Office of Legacy Management (LM) relative to maintaining critical records and the way those goals are being addressed at Hanford. The paper discusses the current practices for document control, as well as the use of modern databases for both storing and accessing the data to support cleanup decisions. In addition to the information goals of LM, the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, known as the ''Tri-Party Agreement'' (TPA) is one of the main drivers in documentation and data management. The TPA, which specifies discrete milestones for cleaning up the Hanford Site, is a legally binding agreement among the US Department of Energy (DOE), the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The TPA requires that DOE provide the lead regulatory agency with the results of analytical laboratory and non-laboratory tests/readings to help guide them in making decisions. The Agreement also calls for each signatory to preserve--for at least ten years after the Agreement has ended--all of the records in its or its contractors, possession related to sampling, analysis, investigations, and monitoring conducted. The tools used at Hanford to meet TPA requirements are also the tools that can satisfy the needs of LM.

CONNELL, C.W.; HILDEBRAND, R.D.

2006-12-14T23:59:59.000Z

5

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Requirements by Law  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Management Energy Management Requirements by Law and Regulation to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Requirements by Law and Regulation on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Requirements by Law and Regulation on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Requirements by Law and Regulation on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Requirements by Law and Regulation on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Requirements by Law and Regulation on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Requirements by Law and Regulation on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation

6

Integrated Management Requirements mapping  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains five appendices documenting how Sandia implemented the DOE Conduct of Operations (5480.19) and DOE Quality Assurance (5700.6C) orders. It provides a mapping of the Sandia integrated requirements to the specific requirements of each Order and a mapping to Sandia`s approved program for implementing the Conduct of Operations Order.

Holmes, J.T.; Andrews, N.S.

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

7

Integrated Management Requirements mapping  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains five appendices documenting how Sandia implemented the DOE Conduct of Operations (5480.19) and DOE Quality Assurance (5700.6C) orders. It provides a mapping of the Sandia integrated requirements to the specific requirements of each Order and a mapping to Sandia's approved program for implementing the Conduct of Operations Order.

Holmes, J.T.; Andrews, N.S.

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

8

Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document This document specifies the top-level...

9

Radioactive Waste Management Complex Wide Review | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Radioactive Waste Management Complex Wide Review Radioactive Waste Management Complex Wide Review The main goal of this complex-wide review was to obtain feedback from DOE sites...

10

Business System Management Review Template  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

F-009 Business System Management Review Template 09_0519 Page 1 of 12 F-009 Business System Management Review Template 09_0519 Page 1 of 12 Company - Business Form Document Title: Business System Management Review Template Document Number: F-009 Rev. 11_0628 Document Owner: Elizabeth Sousa Backup Owner: Melissa Otero Approver(s): Melissa Otero Parent Document: P-004, Business System Management Review Notify of Changes: QAM, MGT Referenced Document(s): N/A F-009 Business System Management Review Template 09_0519 Page 2 of 12 Revision History: Rev. Description of Change A Initial Release 09_0519 Format changes made to template (in particular Section 7.0 CAR/PAR/IO reporting) and several edits for clarification and ease of reading. 11_0628 Modified template categories to reflect current process

11

A systematic review of security requirements engineering  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

One of the most important aspects in the achievement of secure software systems in the software development process is what is known as Security Requirements Engineering. However, very few reviews focus on this theme in a systematic, thorough and unbiased ... Keywords: Requirements engineering, Secure development, Security, Security engineering, Security requirements, Security requirements engineering, Systematic review

Daniel Mellado; Carlos Blanco; Luis E. Sánchez; Eduardo Fernández-Medina

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

12

Requirements-Based Surveillance and Maintenance Review Guide | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requirements-Based Surveillance and Maintenance Review Guide Requirements-Based Surveillance and Maintenance Review Guide Requirements-Based Surveillance and Maintenance Review Guide Use of the Guidance Manual This manual was developed to provide organizations with the knowledge and tools necessary to perform a disciplined and thorough Requirements-Based Surveillance and Maintenance (RBSM) review at any given facility or site in order to cost effectively manage S&M activities. Sections 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 of this manual provide a brief explanation of what the RBSM review process is, why such a process is needed and the steps a facility or site should take to get organized and initiate an RBSM review. Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this manual discuss the use of the data gained from the RBSM review process like the development of cost reduction strategies and the development of

13

Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events, September 2011 Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events, September 2011 Following the March 2011 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the Department of Energy (DOE) took several actions to review the safety of its nuclear facilities. These actions focused on learning how DOE can better prepare to manage potential beyond design basis events. A summary of these actions and the resulting insights, and recommended opportunities and actions to improve nuclear safety at DOE> are included in the attached report. I have directed

14

NERSC HPC Program Requirements Review Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Published Reports Published Reports NERSC HPC Program Requirements Review Reports These publications comprise the final reports from the HPC requirements reviews presented to the Department of Energy. Downloads NERSC-PRR-HEP-2017.pdf | Adobe Acrobat PDF file Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for High Energy Physics - Target 2017 BER2017FinalJune7.pdf | Adobe Acrobat PDF file Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Biological and Environmental Research - Target 2017 NERSC-ASCR-WorkshopReport.pdf | Adobe Acrobat PDF file Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Advanced Scientific Computing Research NERSC-NP-WorkshopReport.pdf | Adobe Acrobat PDF file Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Nuclear Physics Research NERSC-FES-WorkshopReport.pdf | Adobe Acrobat PDF file

15

Adaptive Management, Adaptive Planning, Review and Audit  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Planning should be a continuous, iterative and developmental ... for any given place and time. Management reviews are an integral and essential component of ... is not strictly a component of the management planning

Mike Alexander

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

16

Transition of Long-Term Response Action Management Requirements...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transition of Long-Term Response Action Management Requirements Transition of Long-Term Response Action Management Requirements The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you...

17

Policy Flash: 2013-52 Contractor Legal Management Requirements...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Flash: 2013-52 Contractor Legal Management Requirements: Final Rule Policy Flash: 2013-52 Contractor Legal Management Requirements: Final Rule Questions concerning this policy...

18

Uranium enrichment management review: summary of analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In May 1980, the Assistant Secretary for Resource Applications within the Department of Energy requested that a group of experienced business executives be assembled to review the operation, financing, and management of the uranium enrichment enterprise as a basis for advising the Secretary of Energy. After extensive investigation, analysis, and discussion, the review group presented its findings and recommendations in a report on December 2, 1980. The following pages contain background material on which that final report was based. This report is arranged in chapters that parallel those of the uranium enrichment management review final report - chapters that contain summaries of the review group's discussion and analyses in six areas: management of operations and construction; long-range planning; marketing of enrichment services; financial management; research and development; and general management. Further information, in-depth analysis, and discussion of suggested alternative management practices are provided in five appendices.

Not Available

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Sustainable Buildings on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Basics Federal Requirements By Regulation

20

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable Energy on AddThis.com... Energy-Efficient Products Technology Deployment Renewable Energy Federal Requirements Renewable Resources & Technologies

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Cyber Security Requirements for Risk Management  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Notice ensures that system owners consistently assess the threats to and vulnerabilities of systems in order to implement adequate security controls. The Notice will also ensure compliance with the requirements of DOE O 205.1, Department of Energy Cyber Security Management Program, dated 3-21-03, and protect DOE information and information systems from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction. DOE N 205.15, dated 3/18/05, extends this directive until 3/18/06.

2004-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

22

Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The CRD addresses the requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 413.3-Change 1, ''Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets'', by providing the Secretarial Acquisition Executive (Level 0) scope baseline and the Program-level (Level 1) technical baseline. The Secretarial Acquisition Executive approves the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management's (OCRWM) critical decisions and changes against the Level 0 baseline; and in turn, the OCRWM Director approves all changes against the Level 1 baseline. This baseline establishes the top-level technical scope of the CRMWS and its three system elements, as described in section 1.3.2. The organizations responsible for design, development, and operation of system elements described in this document must therefore prepare subordinate project-level documents that are consistent with the CRD. Changes to requirements will be managed in accordance with established change and configuration control procedures. The CRD establishes requirements for the design, development, and operation of the CRWMS. It specifically addresses the top-level governing laws and regulations (e.g., ''Nuclear Waste Policy Act'' (NWPA), 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 63, 10 CFR Part 71, etc.) along with specific policy, performance requirements, interface requirements, and system architecture. The CRD shall be used as a vehicle to incorporate specific changes in technical scope or performance requirements that may have significant program implications. Such may include changes to the program mission, changes to operational capability, and high visibility stakeholder issues. The CRD uses a systems approach to: (1) identify key functions that the CRWMS must perform, (2) allocate top-level requirements derived from statutory, regulatory, and programmatic sources, and (3) define the basic elements of the system architecture and operational concept. Project-level documents address CRD requirements by further defining system element functions, decomposing requirements into significantly greater detail, and developing designs of system components, facilities, and equipment. The CRD addresses the identification and control of functional, physical, and operational boundaries between and within CRWMS elements. The CRD establishes requirements regarding key interfaces between the CRWMS and elements external to the CRWMS. Project elements define interfaces between CRWMS program elements. The Program has developed a change management process consistent with DOE Order 413.3-Change 1. Changes to the Secretarial Acquisition Executive and Program-level baselines must be approved by a Program Baseline Change Control Board. Specific thresholds have been established for identifying technical, cost, and schedule changes that require approval. The CRWMS continually evaluates system design and operational concepts to optimize performance and/or cost. The Program has developed systems analysis tools to assess potential enhancements to the physical system and to determine the impacts from cost saving initiatives, scientific and technological improvements, and engineering developments. The results of systems analyses, if appropriate, are factored into revisions to the CRD as revised Programmatic Requirements.

C.A. Kouts

2006-05-10T23:59:59.000Z

23

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water Efficiency on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Basics

24

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for the Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal

25

Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening Line Management Oversight and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Standard Review Plan Standard Review Plan Preparation for Facility Operations Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities August 2013 2 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Preparation for Facility Operations Applicability CD-0 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 Operation Post Operation August 2013 3 Table of Contents Objective ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Requirements .................................................................................................................................. 4 Primary References ......................................................................................................................... 6

26

Review article Influence of electric conductivity management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Review article Influence of electric conductivity management on greenhouse tomato yield and fruit quality Martine DORAISa,b*, Athanasios P. PAPADOPOULOSa, André GOSSELINb a Greenhouse and Processing Crops Horticulture, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, QC, G1K 7P4, Canada (Received 3 August 2000; revised 6 February

Boyer, Edmond

27

Managing Stakeholder Requirements in High Performance Computing Procurement  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Managing Stakeholder Requirements in High Performance Computing Procurement John Rooksby1 , Mark Department of Management, Lancaster University High Performance Computing (HPC) facilities are provided strategy can rigorously meet the demands of the potential users. 1 Introduction High Performance Computing

Sommerville, Ian

28

Emergency Management Criteria & Review Approach Documents | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Management Criteria & Review Approach Documents Emergency Management Criteria & Review Approach Documents Emergency Management Criteria & Review Approach Documents Documents Available for Download CRAD, Emergency Management - Idaho Accelerated Retrieval Project Phase II CRAD, Emergency Management - Los Alamos National Laboratory TA 55 SST Facility CRAD, Emergency Management - Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility CRAD, Emergency Management - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor CRAD, Emergency Management - Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Flux Isotope Reactor Contractor ORR CRAD, Emergency Management - Office of River Protection K Basin Sludge Waste System CRAD, Emergency Management - Y-12 Enriched Uranium Operations Oxide

29

Review of Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During Closure Operations Review of Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During Closure Operations Administrative and...

30

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management for Building 3019 This report documents the independent review of implementation verification review (IVR) processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (ORO-EM) conducted by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The review involved evaluation of established IVR processes and implementation of the newly revised documented safety analysis (DSA) and technical safety

31

Review of Selected Elements of Emergency Management at the Oak...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF SELECTED ELEMENTS OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AT THE OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY July 2011 i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF SELECTED ELEMENTS OF EMERGENCY...

32

REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......continuity management standards: the earlier British standard BS 25999 and the international...requirements of the latter standard. The fourth part of...Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information...first three chapters review the threat landscape......

Project Management for IT-related Projects (Second Edition) ? M & A Integration: How to do it ? Pegasus: The Seminal Early Computer ? The Computer Incident Response Planning Handbook: Executable Plans for Protecting Information at Risk ? Interop – The Promise; Perils of Highly Interconnected Systems ? Business continuity management systems

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

Implementation Plan: Jasper Management Prestart Review (Surrogate Material Experiments)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Able Site is located 24 km northwest of Mercury on the Nevada Test Site. The Nevada Test Site is approximately 105 km northwest of Las Vegas, NV. Major facilities at Able Site include Buildings 5100,5180, and 5191. Significant external interfaces for the JASPER site include the electrical system, wastewater system, communications systems, and water supply system, which provides both potable and fire-protection water. Support services, which are provided on the Nevada Test Site, include medical, emergency response (NTS Fire Department), radiation protection, industrial hygiene, and waste management. Although JASPER will ultimately be used for actinide research, the start-up process requires system demonstration using surrogates in place of the actinide targets. LLNL Nevada Experiments and Operations (N) Program has established a Management Prestart Review (MPR) team to determine the readiness of the JASPER personnel and facilities to initiate surrogate-material experiments. A second MPR will be conducted before actinide experiments are executed. This document addresses implementation requirements for only the first MPR. This first review coincides with the completion of authorization-basis documents and physical subsystems, which have undergone appropriate formal engineering design reviews. This MPR will affirm the quality of those reviews, their findings/resolutions, and will look most closely at systems integration requirements and demonstrations that will have undergone technical acceptance reviews before this formal MPR action. Closure of MPR findings will finalize requirements for a DOE/NV Real Estate/Operations Permit (REOP) for surrogate-material experiments. Upon completion of that experiment series and the establishment of capabilities for incorporating special nuclear material (SNM) into future experiments, the team will convene again as part of the process of authorizing those activities. A summary of the review schedule is provided.

Cooper, W.E.

2000-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

34

Security Requirements Model for Grid Data Management Systems  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

In this paper, we present our ongoing work of a policy-driven approach to security requirements of grid data management systems (GDMS). We analyse the security functionalities of existing GDMS to determine their ...

Syed Naqvi; Philippe Massonet; Alvaro Arenas

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

35

Advanced Topics in Workflow Management: Issues, Requirements, and Solutions  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, flexible workflow management, workflow analysis 1. Introduction In recent years, a variety of approaches1 Advanced Topics in Workflow Management: Issues, Requirements, and Solutions Wil M.P. van der Systems Group Department of Computer Science Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster Einsteinstrasse 62

van der Aalst, Wil

36

REQUIREMENTS BASED SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE REVIEW PROCESS INTERVIEW FORM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REQUIREMENTS BASED SURVEILLANCE AND REQUIREMENTS BASED SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE REVIEW PROCESS INTERVIEW FORM General Information: A. Evaluator:_______________________ Organization:___________________ Ph:_________________ B. Interviewee:_____________________ Organization:____________________ Ph:_________________ C. Activity Name :_____________________________________________________ General/Administrative Support Mission/Facility Support (Circle One) D. Safety Related: _____Yes _____No E. Procedure #: _______________________________________________________ F. Charge Number: _____________________________________________________ G. Frequency for Conducting the Activity: (Circle One) Hourly Shiftly Daily Weekly Bi-weekly Monthly Quarterly Semi-Annually Annually

37

CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. Standards and Requirements Identification Document (SRID) Requirements Management System and Requirements Specification  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The current Tank Farm Contractor (TFC) for the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (ORP), River Protection Project (RPP), CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. (CHG), will use a computer based requirements management system. The system will serve as a tool to assist in identifying, capturing, and maintaining the Standards/Requirements Identification Document (S/RID) requirements and links to implementing procedures and other documents. By managing requirements as one integrated set, CHG will be able to carry out its mission more efficiently and effectively. CHG has chosen the Dynamic Object Oriented Requirements System (DOORS{trademark}) as the preferred computer based requirements management system. Accordingly, the S/RID program will use DOORS{trademark}. DOORS{trademark} will replace the Environmental Requirements Management Interface (ERMI) system as the tool for S/RID data management. The DOORS{trademark} S/RID test project currently resides on the DOORSTM test server. The S/RID project will be migrated to the DOORS{trademark} production server. After the migration the S/RID project will be considered a production project and will no longer reside on the test server.

JOHNSON, A.L.

2000-11-30T23:59:59.000Z

38

Supplemental Requirements for the Use of Management and Operating or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Notice supplements review and approval requirements of DOE O 350.2A, Use of Management and Operating (M&O) or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area, dated 10-29-03.

2005-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

39

ORISE: Peer Review Expert Identification  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Expert Identification Two peer review experts discussing the review topic Effective peer review management requires finding academic reviewers or other experts and recruiting them...

40

Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan (SRP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Standard Review Plan (SRP), Application of Engineering and Technical Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities, was developed by the Chief of Nuclear Safety (CNS)1, Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. This SRP (hereafter refers to as the Engineering SRP) provides consistent review guidance to assure that engineering and technical requirements are appropriately applied for the design, operations and disposition2 of DOE nuclear facilities. It is one of a series of three SRPs developed by the CNS. The other two SRPs address: 1) nuclear safety basis program review; and 2) application of requirements of DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, and DOE-STD-1189, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, for DOE Critical Decision (CD) review and approval. These SRPs may be revised in the future to reflect changes in the DOE requirements, lessons learned, and experience/insights from nuclear facility design, operations, and disposition.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Proper management of wildlife populations requires an in-depth knowledge of habitat require-  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Proper management of wildlife populations requires an in-depth knowledge of habitat require- ments not call at wind speeds > 4.8 km/h and with clear to foggy skies. Frogs called at tempera- tures > 14°C and wind speeds

McCallum, Malcolm

42

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product...

43

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management- February 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management for Building 3019

44

Plan of Action: JASPER Management Prestart Review (Surrogate Material Experiments)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER) Facility is being developed at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) to conduct shock physics experiments on special nuclear material and other actinide materials. JASPER will use a two-stage, light-gas gun to shoot projectiles at actinide targets. Projectile velocities will range from 1 to 8 km/s, inducing pressures in the target material up to 6 Mbar. The JASPER gas gun has been designed to match the critical dimensions of the two-stage, light-gas gun in Building 341 of LLNL. The goal in copying the LLNL gun design is to take advantage of the extensive ballistics database that exists and to minimize the effort spent on gun characterization in the initial facility start-up. A siting study conducted by an inter-Laboratory team identified Able Site in Area 27 of the NTS as the best location for the JASPER gas gun. Able Site consists of three major buildings that had previously been used to support the nuclear test program. In April 1999, Able Site was decommissioned as a Nuclear Explosive Assembly Facility and turned back to the DOE for other uses. Construction and facility modifications at Able Site to support the JASPER project started in April 1999 and were completed in September 1999. The gas gun and the secondary confinement chamber (SCC) were installed in early 2000. During the year, all facility and operational systems were brought on line. Initial system integration demonstrations were completed in September 2000. The facility is anticipated to be operational by August 2001, and the expected life cycle for the facility is 10 years. LLNL Nevada Experiments and Operations (N) Program has established a Management Prestart Review (MPR) team to determine the readiness of the JASPER personnel and facilities to initiate surrogate-material experiments. The review coincides with the completion of authorization-basis documents and physical subsystems, which have undergone appropriate formal engineering design reviews. This MPR will affirm the quality of those reviews, their findings/resolutions, and will look most closely at systems integration requirements and demonstrations that will have undergone technical acceptance reviews before the formal MPR action. Closure of MPR findings will finalize requirements for a DOE/NV Real Estate/Operations Permit (REOP) for surrogate-material experiments. Upon completion of that experiment series and the establishment of capabilities for incorporating SNM into future experiments, the team will convene again as part of the process of authorizing those activities.

Cooper, W.E.

2000-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

45

Plan of Action: JASPER Management Prestart Review (Surrogate Material Experiment)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER) Facility is being developed at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) to conduct shock physics experiments on special nuclear material and other actinide materials. JASPER will use a two-stage, light-gas gun to shoot projectiles at actinide targets. Projectile velocities will range from 1 to 8 km/s, inducing pressures in the target material up to 6 Mbar. The JASPER gas gun has been designed to match the critical dimensions of the two-stage, light-gas gun in Building 341 of LLNL. The goal in copying the LLNL gun design is to take advantage of the extensive ballistics database that exists and to minimize the effort spent on gun characterization in the initial facility start-up. A siting study conducted by an inter-Laboratory team identified Able Site in Area 27 of the NTS as the best location for the JASPER gas gun. Able Site consists of three major buildings that had previously been used to support the nuclear test program. In April 1999, Able Site was decommissioned as a Nuclear Explosive Assembly Facility and turned back to the DOE for other uses. Construction and facility modifications at Able Site to support the JASPER project started in April 1999 and were completed in September 1999. The gas gun and the secondary confinement chamber (SCC) were installed in early 2000. During the year, all facility and operational systems were brought on line. Initial system integration demonstrations were completed in September 2000. The facility is anticipated to be operational by August 2001, and the expected life cycle for the facility is 10 years. LLNL Nevada Experiments and Operations (N) Program has established a Management Prestart Review (MPR) team to determine the readiness of the JASPER personnel and facilities to initiate surrogate-material experiments. The review coincides with the completion of authorization-basis documents and physical subsystems, which have undergone appropriate formal engineering design reviews. This MPR will affirm the quality of those reviews, their findings/resolutions, and will look most closely at systems integration requirements and demonstrations that will have undergone technical acceptance reviews before the formal MPR action. Closure of MPR findings will finalize requirements for a DOE/NV Real Estate/Operations Permit (REOP) for surrogate-material experiments. Upon completion of that experiment series and the establishment of capabilities for incorporating SNM into future experiments, the team will convene again as part of the process of authorizing those activities.

Cooper, W E

2000-12-05T23:59:59.000Z

46

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Greenhouse Gas Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Requirements Requirements Executive Order (E.O.) 13514 expands the energy reduction and environmental requirements of Executive Order 13423 by making greenhouse gas (GHG) management a priority for the Federal government. Under Section 2 of E.O. 13514, each Federal agency must: Within 90 days of the order, establish and report to the CEQ Chair and OMB Director a percentage reduction target for agency-wide reductions of Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions in absolute terms by fiscal year 2020 relative to a fiscal year 2008 baseline of the agency's Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions. In establishing the target, agencies shall consider reductions associated with: Reducing agency building energy intensity Increasing agency renewable energy use and implementing on-site renewable energy generation projects

47

Efficiency Data Management Overview- 2014 BTO Peer Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presenter: Elena Alschuler, U.S. Department of Energy This presentation at the 2014 Peer Review provided an overview of the Building Technologies Office's Efficiency Data Management activities. Through robust feedback, the BTO Program Peer Review enhances existing efforts and improves future designs.

48

These requirements were last reviewed by the CALS Curriculum Committee in 201011 and must undergo their next review by 201415.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

their next review by 201415. Curriculum Sheet Bachelor of Science Landscape Architecture Professional Biological Science Additional Science Science Breadth ***ENVIR ST/GEOG 127 (required below) fulfills the CALS International Studies requirement. Landscape Architecture Degree Requirements Courses may

Wisconsin at Madison, University of

49

Response to Director's Review of Fermilab Project Management Improvement Initiatives  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Response to Director's Review of Fermilab Project Management Improvement Initiatives Response to Director's Review of Fermilab Project Management Improvement Initiatives May 14, 2013 Executive Summary Fermilab is entering a new, transitional era defined by the transformation from operating a very large experimental facility over several decades to managing and delivering a portfolio of new projects within technical performance, budget and schedule expectations. Throughout CY12, internal and external reviews identified some systemic weaknesses in execution of some construction activities and fabrication of components, including procurement planning and execution, cost estimating, and internal project communication. These Project Management System concerns have the potential to impact other projects and operational activities at the Laboratory if not addressed. Coincident with the

50

Environmental Science and Management Requirements for a Minor in Environmental Studies  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Environmental Science and Management Requirements for a Minor in Environmental Studies.............................................................................8 Environmental Policy/Management Courses (minimum 4 credits) EC 432 . Environmental Economics ................................................................................... 4 Geog 446 Water Resource Management

51

Status Report: EM Acquisition and Project Management Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Report: Acquisition and Project Report: Acquisition and Project Management Review August 15, 2006 Submitted by: Mr. James Ajello and Mr. Dennis Ferrigno Background: The Environmental Management Advisory Board is in the process of providing Jack Surash, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management (EM-50), records of past EMAB recommendations and commentary. Mr. Ajello and Mr. Ferrigno believe that the records will be helpful to Mr. Surash and his staff. EMAB has identified the following actionable items: Provide Mr. Surash with EMAB committee files for review Have Mr. Ferrigno contact Mr. Surash to arrange a meeting for discussion of said materials Have Mr. Ajello and Mr. Ferrigno meet with Mr. Surash periodically to discuss project management and contract issues, as per request of EM-1.

52

Emergency Management Focused Program Review at Argonne National Laboratory - West  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Argonne National Argonne National Laboratory - West W Emergency Management Focused Program Review at Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance May 2001 OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 4 2.0 RESULTS ..................................................................................... 6 Hazards Assessment .................................................................... 6 Emergency Management Programmatic Interfaces ................... 9 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RATINGS ............................................. 14 4.0 OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT ............................ 15 APPENDIX A - EVALUATION PROCESS AND

53

Standard Review Plan for Environmental Restoration Program Quality Management Plans. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL) Manual Environmental Restoration Program Quality System Requirements (QSR) for the Hanford Site, defines all quality requirements governing Hanford Environmental Restoration (ER) Program activities. The QSR requires that ER Program participants develop Quality Management Plans (QMPs) that describe how the QSR requirements will be implemented for their assigned scopes of work. This standard review plan (SRP) describes the ER program participant responsibilities for submittal of QMPs to the RL Environmental Restoration Division for review and the RL methodology for performing the reviews of participant QMPS. The SRP serves the following functions: acts as a guide in the development or revision of QMPs to assure that the content is complete and adequate; acts as a checklist to be used by the RL staff in their review of participant QMPs; acts as an index or matrix between the requirements of the QSR and implementing methodologies described in the QMPs; decreases the time and subjectivity of document reviews; and provides a formal, documented method for describing exceptions, modifications, or waivers to established ER Program quality requirements.

Not Available

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

Emergency Management Program Review at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Waste Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Emergency Management Program Review at the May 2000 OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 4 2.0 RESULTS ......................................................................................... 6 Hazards Survey and Hazards Assessments .................................. 6 Program Plans, Procedures, and Responder Performance ........ 9 Training, Drills, and Exercises ..................................................... 13 Emergency Public Information and Offsite Response Interfaces ....................................................................................... 15 Feedback and Continuous Improvement Process

55

Reviewing the human dimensions of wildlife management and recreation  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Reviewing the human dimensions of wildlife management and recreation Mariella Marzano Norman Dandy and the Recreational Use of Forests" (Marzano & Dandy 2011) · Overview of disturbance relating to recreational off path/trail)? 2. How do recreational users perceive their own and others' impacts on wildlife

56

Exam Review WFS 340: Wetlands Ecology and Management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Exam Review WFS 340: Wetlands Ecology and Management What is a Jurisdictional Wetland? 1) Know the 3 USACE criteria that are necessary for an area to be classified as a jurisdictional wetland. 2 to meet USACE jurisdictional wetland criteria, and how to calculate percent dominance using the 50

Gray, Matthew

57

A commodity approach to aging management review of supports for license renewal  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

10CFR Part 54 requires that nuclear power plant licensees who seek renewal of their operating licenses for an additional 20 years of operation (i.e., for a total operating life of 60 years) perform an Integrated Plant Assessment (IPA) on all systems, structures and components (SSCs) within the scope of license renewal. Baltimore Gas and Electric (BGE) and MPR Associates, Inc., have recently completed an aging management review of component supports for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP). A commodity approach was used on the basis that component supports perform essentially the same function regardless of the system with which they are associated. This approach, i.e., treating component supports as commodities as opposed to performing the aging management review for each individual component support, resulted in a cost-effective approach for this portion of the IPA. An important feature of the aging management review of component support at CCNPP is the evaluation of the adequacy of existing programs to manage component support aging. Two major programs were included in the evaluation: the ASME Section 11 In-Service Inspection (ISI) Program, and CCNPP`s Seismic Verification Project to resolve USI A-46. The key role that these programs play in the overall aging management strategy for component supports, as well as the evaluation of other on-going activities which complete the aging management approach for component supports, are discussed.

Schlaseman, C.S. [MPR Associates, Inc., Washington, DC (United States); Tilden, B.M. [Baltimore Gas and Electric Co., MD (United States)

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

58

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT Management Review Team Conc~~rrence Sign-Off  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT Management Review Team Conc~~rrence Sign-Off April 24,2001 ACTION: DRAFT ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT OF GROUND WATER COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES AT THE URANIUM MILL TAILINGS SITE, SHIPROCK, NEW MEXICO ISSUE: DraR Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Shiprock, New Mexico, to the Navajo Nation, federal and tribal regulatoly agencies, and other interested stakeholders for review and comment. RECOMMENDATION: The Management Review Team and the DOE-AL NEPA Compliance Off~cer have determined that this E A meets the requirements of 10 CFR 1021 and implementing g u i d a n p q d is adequate for transmittal to the external stakeholders. DOE-GJO ~ocumen&ana~er ' D. Metzler WE-& NCO J. Robbins

59

Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex – March 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Uranium Processing Facility Project Design Requirements and Configuration Management Program

60

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1950 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS R. E. BEARD Statistics...Price 20s. [453 ] REVIEWS Statistics, Volume I...regard to the mathematical standard required by the Institute...distributions.' The general plan of the book is first......

R. E. BEARD

1950-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Review of Self-direct Demand Side Management (DSM) Programs  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Review of Self-direct Demand Side Management (DSM) Programs Review of Self-direct Demand Side Management (DSM) Programs Title Review of Self-direct Demand Side Management (DSM) Programs Publication Type Presentation Year of Publication 2012 Authors Borgeson, Merrian Keywords demand side resources: policy, electricity markets, electricity markets and policy group, energy analysis and environmental impacts department, energy efficiency, self direct programs, technical assistance Full Text LBNL recently provided technical assistance funded by DOE to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio to inform their decision-making about changes to their existing self-direct program for commercial and industrial customers. Self-direct programs are usually targeted at large industrial customers with specialized needs or strong in-house energy engineering capacity. These programs are found in at least 24 states, and there is significant variety in how these programs are structured - with important implications for the additionality and reliability of the energy savings that result. LBNL reviewed existing programs and compared key elements of self-direct program design. For additional questions about this work, please contact Merrian Borgeson.

62

Nuclear Safety Basis Program Review Overview and Management Oversight Standard Review Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This SRP, Nuclear Safety Basis Program Review, consists of five volumes. It provides information to help strengthen the technical rigor of line management oversight and federal monitoring of DOE nuclear facilities. It provides a primer on the safety basis development and documentation process used by the DOE. It also provides a set of LOIs for the review of safety basis programs and documents of nuclear facilities at various stages of the facility life cycle.

63

Compliance With Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements (10 CFR Parts 1021 and 1022)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy (DOE) revised its floodplain and wetland environmental review requirements to add flexibility and remove unnecessary procedural burdens by simplifying DOE public...

64

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Document details the peer review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement portfolio.

65

Review of Selected Elements of Emergency Management at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, July 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OVERSIGHT OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF SELECTED ELEMENTS OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AT THE OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY July 2011 i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF SELECTED ELEMENTS OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AT THE OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 REVIEW SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 2008 HSS Emergency Management Inspection Findings ......................................................... 2

66

Additional Requirements and Guidance for Digital Data Management...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Data Management Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) SBIRSTTR Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) Applicant...

67

EISA Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy Management Program is responsible for tracking Federal agency progress toward meeting Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.

68

Additional Requirements and Guidance for Digital Data Management...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

A A A FeedbackShare Page The following requirements and guidance provided by the Basic Energy Sciences (BES) program supplement but do not replace the requirements and guidance...

69

These requirements were last reviewed by the CALS Curriculum Committee in 201011 and must undergo their next review by 201415.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

their next review by 201415. Curriculum Sheet Bachelor of Science Degree Landscape Architecture Major Science Science Breadth Landscape Architecture Major Requirements Courses may not double count credits must be completed in the major that are not used elsewhere. ENVIR ST 127 (required below

Wisconsin at Madison, University of

70

LANL surveillance requirements management and surveillance requirements from NA-12 tasking memo  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Surveillance briefing to NNSA to support a tasking memo from NA-12 on Surveillance requirements. This talk presents the process for developing surveillance requirements, discusses the LANL requirements that were issued as part of that tasking memo, and presents recommendations on Component Evaluation and Planning Committee activities for FY11.

Hills, Charles R [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2011-01-25T23:59:59.000Z

71

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Operations and  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance The following laws and regulations set advanced metering and measurement requirements for Federal agencies. Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005: Requires all Federal buildings to be metered by October 1, 2012, to ensure efficient energy use and reduce the cost of electricity used in Federal facilities. Advanced meters or metering devices must provide data at least daily and measure the consumption of electricity at least hourly. These devices must be used to the maximum extent practical. Requires Federal agencies to submit to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) an implementation plan identifying personnel responsible for achieving metering requirements, and any determination by the agency that advanced meters or metering systems are not practical in their specific situation.

72

FLEXIBILITY IN WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: REVIEW OF CONCEPTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF ASSESSMENT MEASURES FOR FLOOD MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

FLEXIBILITY IN WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: REVIEW OF CONCEPTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF ASSESSMENT around adapting water management systems to climate change often express the need to increase system it means to have a flexible water management system, what features of a system make it more flexible than

Tullos, Desiree

73

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Water  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Water Efficiency Water Efficiency The following Federal laws and regulations require Federal agencies to reduce water use and improve water efficiency. Executive Order 13423 Executive Order (E.O.) 13423 requires Federal agencies to reduce water consumption intensity (gallons per square foot) 2% annually through the end of fiscal year (FY) 2015 or 16% by the end of FY 2015 from a 2007 baseline. This requirement is to be achieved incrementally by fiscal year beginning in 2008. Fiscal Year Percentage Reduction 2008 2 2009 4 2010 6 2011 8 2012 10 2013 12 2014 14 2015 16 E.O. 13423 Mandated Facility Water Intensity Reductions by Fiscal Year E.O. 13423 also directs Federal facilities to conduct annual water audits of at least 10% of facility square footage and to conduct audits at least

74

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Requirements for Renewable  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Multiple laws and executive orders define requirements for the use of renewable energy in Federal facilities. The Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005: Defines "renewable energy" as electric energy generated from solar, wind, biomass, landfill gas, ocean (including tidal, wave, current, and thermal), geothermal, municipal solid waste, or new hydroelectric generation capacity achieved from increased efficiency or additions of new capacity at an existing hydroelectric project Requires the Secretary of Energy to ensure that, to the extent economically feasible and technically practicable, the following amounts of the total electricity consumed by the Federal government come from renewable energy: Not less than 3% in fiscal years 2007-2009

75

Managing uncertainty: a review of food system scenario analysis and modelling  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...Knowledge Management, Government Office for Science, , 1 Victoria Street, London...Brighton, UK While the Government Office for Science commissioned this review, the...Knowledge Management, Government Office for Science, 1 Victoria Street, London...

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Generalized Information Architecture for Managing Requirements in IBM?s Rational DOORS(r) Application.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

When a requirements engineering effort fails to meet expectations, often times the requirements management tool is blamed. Working with numerous project teams at Sandia National Laboratories over the last fifteen years has shown us that the tool is rarely the culprit; usually it is the lack of a viable information architecture with well- designed processes to support requirements engineering. This document illustrates design concepts with rationale, as well as a proven information architecture to structure and manage information in support of requirements engineering activities for any size or type of project. This generalized information architecture is specific to IBM's Rational DOORS (Dynamic Object Oriented Requirements System) software application, which is the requirements management tool in Sandia's CEE (Common Engineering Environment). This generalized information architecture can be used as presented or as a foundation for designing a tailored information architecture for project-specific needs. It may also be tailored for another software tool. Version 1.0 4 November 201

Aragon, Kathryn M.; Eaton, Shelley M.; McCornack, Marjorie T.; Shannon, Sharon A.

2014-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

77

CAN PLAN OR NO CAN PLAN? REVIEW OF NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANNING IN HAWAI`I  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CAN PLAN OR NO CAN PLAN? REVIEW OF NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANNING IN HAWAI`I DAVID DUFFY,* S with planning experts and reviewed current literature to derive 15 criteria that in our opinion were important that reviewed plans only partially fulfilled most criteria. Only five reviewed plans came within 10% of total

Duffy, David Cameron

78

Why Energy Audits Aren't Enough: An Energy Management System is Required  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

An evaluation of the energy systems in a plant can be accomplished by different techniques which require different levels of effort. Three alternatives are described: Rational Analysis, Energy Audits and Energy Management by Utility Systems Metering...

Haft, A. J.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

79

Database Requirements for Workflow Management in a HighThroughput Genome Laboratory 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Database Requirements for Workflow Management in a High­Throughput Genome Laboratory 1 Anthony J and operationally efficient. A key component of this software is a database management system (DBMS) for controlling constitutes an audit trail, or event history, and has much the same function as a laboratory notebook

Bonner, Anthony

80

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION - Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

September 16, 2011 September 16, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION FROM: SUBJECT: DANIEL B. PONEMA Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events Following the March 2011 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the Department of Energy (DOE) took several actions to review the safety of its nuclear facilities. These actions focused on learning how DOE can better prepare to manage potential beyond design basis events. A summary of these actions and the resulting insights, and recommended opportunities and actions to improve nuclear safety at DOE> are included in the attached report. I have directed the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) to work with DOE's Nuclear Safety and Security Coordinating Council, and the Program and Field Offices of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION - Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 16, 2011 September 16, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION FROM: SUBJECT: DANIEL B. PONEMA Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events Following the March 2011 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the Department of Energy (DOE) took several actions to review the safety of its nuclear facilities. These actions focused on learning how DOE can better prepare to manage potential beyond design basis events. A summary of these actions and the resulting insights, and recommended opportunities and actions to improve nuclear safety at DOE> are included in the attached report. I have directed the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) to work with DOE's Nuclear Safety and Security Coordinating Council, and the Program and Field Offices of

82

Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Oversight Review of Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Summary of Results ............................................................................................................... 1

83

Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Oversight Review of Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Summary of Results ............................................................................................................... 1

84

Review of Management of Safety Systems at the Hanford Tank Farms, April 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of Independent Oversight Review of Management of Safety Systems at the Hanford Tank Farms May 2011 February 2013 April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose.................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2

85

Review of Requirements and Capabilities For Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review of Requirements Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events Office of Nuclear Safety Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy August 2011 2011 Safety Bulletin Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms i Executive Summary ii 1. Introduction 1 2. Report Overview 1 3. Overview of DOE Nuclear Facilities and Operations 2 4. Analysis of Safety Bulletin Submittals 2 5. Review of DOE and Commercial Nuclear Power Industry Requirements and 5 Guidance for BDBEs 6. Results from the Nuclear Safety Workshop 9 7. Summary of Insights and Opportunities for Improvement 10 8. Summary of Recommendations 12 9. Conclusions 14 Appendix A - DOE's Nuclear Safety Approach 15

86

Report of the Review of the Hanford Solid Waste Environmental Impact Statement regarding Data Quality Control and Management Issues  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review of the Hanford Review of the Hanford Solid Waste Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Data Quality, Control and Management Issues January 2006 Hanford Solid Waste Environment Impact Statement (EIS) Data Quality, Control and Management Issues Review Report ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. IV 1.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 REVIEW APPROACH....................................................................................................... 1 3.0 SUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 2 4.0 REVIEW RESULTS........................................................................................................... 4

87

Independent Oversight Review of the Emergency Management Program...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

the sites' plans and procedures for attaining and maintaining the necessary response and recovery capabilities. The scope of this review is consistent with HSS Criteria, Review,...

88

Independent management and financial review, Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Yucca Mountain Project is one part of the Department of Energy`s Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program (the Program) which was established by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, and as amended in 1987. The Program`s goal is to site the nation`s first geologic repository for the permanent disposal of high-level nuclear waste, in the form of spent fuel rod assemblies, generated by the nuclear power industry and a smaller quantity of Government radioactive waste. The Program, which also encompasses the transportation system and the multipurpose canister system was not the subject of this Report. The subject of this Review was only the Yucca Mountain Project in Nevada. While the Review was directed toward the Yucca Mountain Project rather than the Program as a whole, there are certain elements of the Project which cannot be addressed except through discussion of some Program issues. An example is the Total System Life Cycle Cost addressed in Section 7 of this report. Where Program issues are discussed in this Report, the reader is reminded of the scope limitations of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) contract to review only the Yucca Mountain Project. The primary scope of the Review was to respond to the specific criteria contained in the NARUC scope of work. In responding to these criteria, the Review Team understood that some interested parties have expressed concern over the requirements of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act relative to the Yucca Mountain Project and the nature of activities currently being carried out by the Department of Energy at the Yucca Mountain Project site. The Review Team has attempted to analyze relevant portions of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act as Amended, but has not conducted a thorough analysis of this legislation that could lead to any specific legal conclusions about all aspects of it.

NONE

1995-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

89

Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the DOE Complex  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Follow-up Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the Department of Energy Complex OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 3 2.0 STATUS OF DOE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ...................................................... 5 Overall Assessment .......................................................................... 5 Improvements to Emergency Management Programs at DOE Sites Since 1998 .................................................................. 5 Continuing Weaknesses ................................................................... 7 Underlying Causes ...........................................................................

90

Employee Motivation in Energy Management Programs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Effective management of energy requires the same degree of manager/employee motivation as other management responsibilities. Basically the same factors cause managers and employees to be motivated and effective. In this discussion, we will review...

Hogeland, A. W.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

NRC review of Electric Power Research Institute's Advanced Light Reactor Utility Requirements Document - Program summary, Project No. 669  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The staff of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has prepared Volume 1 of a safety evaluation report (SER), NRC Review of Electric Power Research Institute's Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document -- Program Summary,'' to document the results of its review of the Electric Power Research Institute's Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document.'' This SER provides a discussion of the overall purpose and scope of the Requirements Document, the background of the staff's review, the review approach used by the staff, and a summary of the policy and technical issues raised by the staff during its review.

Not Available

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW Proposed Amendment 94 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW Proposed Amendment 94 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis April 2010 Lead Agency: National Marine Fisheries Abstract: This Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

93

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Portfolio  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review of the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (EEPP) Portfolio Meeting: Washington D.C., Dec. 4, 2012 Reviewers: David Goldstein (Chair), Harvey Sachs, Cyndi Vallina, Marina Moses, and Shahzeen Attari Review: Jan. 25, 2013 Summary The Review Committee met in Washington, D.C., and engaged in a day-long discussion with FEMP EEPP staff and contractors. Program staff gave clear and effective presentations, and we had extensive and illuminating discussions with the staff, and to a limited extent with other interested parties who attended. The Committee worked together after the meeting and by email to produce this review. Our review addresses: * strategic issues with respect to the program,

94

Review of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Integrated Safety Management System Phase I Verification Review, April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Integrated Safety Management System Phase I Verification Review April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Methodology......................................................................................................................................... 1

95

Review of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Integrated Safety Management System Phase I Verification Review, April 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Integrated Safety Management System Phase I Verification Review April 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Scope.................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background........................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Methodology......................................................................................................................................... 1

96

Review of Requirements and Capabilities For Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

to the to the Secretary of Energy Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events Office of Nuclear Safety Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy August 2011 2011 Safety Bulletin Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms i Executive Summary ii 1. Introduction 1 2. Report Overview 1 3. Overview of DOE Nuclear Facilities and Operations 2 4. Analysis of Safety Bulletin Submittals 2 5. Review of DOE and Commercial Nuclear Power Industry Requirements and 5 Guidance for BDBEs 6. Results from the Nuclear Safety Workshop 9 7. Summary of Insights and Opportunities for Improvement 10 8. Summary of Recommendations 12 9. Conclusions 14

97

PIA - EERE Infrastructure-EERE Reviewer Management System | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Safety Management Workshop Registration, PIA, Idaho National Laboratory PIA - HSPD-12 Physical and Logical Access System PIA - Bonneville Power Adminstration Ethics Helpline...

98

A systematic review of socio-economic assessments in support of coastal zone management (1992–2011)  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Cooperation between the social and natural sciences has become essential in order to encompass all the dimensions of coastal zone management. Socio-economic approaches are increasingly recommended to complement integrated assessment in support of these initiatives. A systematic review of the academic literature was carried out in order to analyze the main types of socio-economic assessments used to inform the coastal zone management process as well as their effectiveness. A corpus of 1682 articles published between 1992 and 2011 was identified by means of the representative coverage approach, from which 170 were selected by applying inclusion/exclusion criteria and then classified using a content analysis methodology. The percentage of articles that mention the use of socio-economic assessment in support of coastal zone management initiatives is increasing but remains relatively low. The review examines the links between the issues addressed by integrated assessments and the chosen analytical frameworks as well as the various economic assessment methods which are used in the successive steps of the coastal zone management process. The results show that i) analytical frameworks such as ‘risk and vulnerability’, ‘DPSIR’, ‘valuation’, ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘preferences’ are likely to lead to effective integration of social sciences in coastal zone management research while ‘integration’, ‘sustainability’ and ‘participation’ remain difficult to operationalize, ii) risk assessments are insufficiently implemented in developing countries, and iii) indicator systems in support of multi-criteria analyses could be used during more stages of the coastal zone management process. Finally, it is suggested that improved collaboration between science and management would require that scientists currently involved in coastal zone management processes further educate themselves in integrated assessment approaches and participatory methodologies.

Eric Le Gentil; Rémi Mongruel

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

Independent Oversight Review of Oak Ridge Environmental Management Radiological Controls Activity Level Implementation - June 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 2011 May 2011 Independent Oversight Review of Oak Ridge Environmental Management Radiological Controls Activity Level Implementation June 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Scope................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 1

100

Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office, October 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Enforcement and Oversight Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office October 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope ................................................................................................................................................ 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Independent Oversight Review of Oak Ridge Environmental Management Radiological Controls Activity Level Implementation - June 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

May 2011 May 2011 Independent Oversight Review of Oak Ridge Environmental Management Radiological Controls Activity Level Implementation June 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Scope................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 1

102

Review of the Implementation Verification Rev iew Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities, September 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Implementation Verification Review Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities May 2011 September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1

103

Review of the Implementation Verification Rev iew Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities, September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Implementation Verification Review Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities May 2011 September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Independent Oversight Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1

104

Chemical Management Volume 3 of 3 - Consolidated Chemical User Safety and Health Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2008 July 2008 DOE HANDBOOK CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT (Volume 3 of 3) Consolidated Chemical User Safety and Health Requirements U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2008 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2008 iii Foreword Numerous requirements have been promulgated to protect workers, equipment, facilities, and the environment. When work is performed, the specific requirements affecting the work must first be identified and incorporated into the work plan. Because such requirements can number in the thousands,

105

Review: constraint programming for air traffic management: A survey1  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Air traffic management (ATM) under its current paradigm is reaching its structural limits considering the continuously growing demand. The need for a decrease in traffic workload opens numerous problems for optimization, from capacity balancing to conflict ...

Cyril Allignol; Nicolas Barnier; Pierre Flener; Justin Pearson

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

106

Critical Review of Desalination Concentrate Management, Treatment and Beneficial Use  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, enhancement of water re- covery, removal of organic contaminants, and recovery of valuable products and energy into product and concentrate (also known as retentate, brine, or reject) streams. Concentrate management

107

Review of grid connection requirements for generation assets in weak power grids  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The integration of variable energy sources in weak power grids poses many technical and economic challenges. Both aspects have an impact on the development of grid codes, that is worth analysing. Grid codes shall be adapted to technical constraints in the corresponding power grid, such as the network strength and the characteristics of generation technologies. This paper reviews and compares technical requirements imposed on to generation assets in countries with very distinct characteristics, in order to analyse the influence of weakness and isolation of a power grid on the interconnection conditions imposed by system operators to grid users. Current and future regulation aspects are covered.

Agurtzane Etxegarai; Pablo Eguia; Esther Torres; Araitz Iturregi; Victor Valverde

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

108

The Mixed Waste Management Facility. Preliminary design review  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document presents information about the Mixed Waste Management Facility. Topics discussed include: cost and schedule baseline for the completion of the project; evaluation of alternative options; transportation of radioactive wastes to the facility; capital risk associated with incineration; radioactive waste processing; scaling of the pilot-scale system; waste streams to be processed; molten salt oxidation; feed preparation; initial operation to demonstrate selected technologies; floorplans; baseline revisions; preliminary design baseline; cost reduction; and project mission and milestones.

NONE

1995-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

109

Review of Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) Requirements Currently Applied to the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) Requirements Currently Applied to the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF) By: Integrated NPH Team: David Luke, Lead, TJSO Rusty Sprouse, JSA Michael A. Epps, TJSO Richard Korynta, TJSO

110

Project management: A Handbook of fundamentals for the packaging student and professional with a review of current literature.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

??This thesis seeks to introduce the basic concepts and techniques of project management to packaging students and professionals. After reviewing these fundamentals, packaging students and… (more)

Fischer, Kenneth

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Idaho National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management System 2010 Effectiveness Review and Declaration Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Idaho National Laboratory completes an annual Integrated Safety Management System effectiveness review per 48 CFR 970.5223-1 “Integration of Environment, Safety and Health into Work Planning and Execution.” The annual review assesses ISMS effectiveness, provides feedback to maintain system integrity, and helps identify target areas for focused improvements and assessments for the following year. Using one of the three Department of Energy (DOE) descriptors in DOE M 450.4-1 regarding the state of ISMS effectiveness during Fiscal Year (FY) 2010, the information presented in this review shows that INL achieved “Effective Performance.”

Thomas J. Haney

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

Suspect Counterfeit Items Criteria Review and Approach Document , Phase 1 - Management - Developed By NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Suspect/Counterfeit Items Suspect/Counterfeit Items Criteria Review and Approach Document (CRAD) NNSA/Nevada Site Office Facility Representative Division Phase 1 - Management Performance Objective: Management should have a formal system under Quality Assurance with adequate controls defined and implemented to identify and preclude Suspect/Counterfeit Items (S/CI) from being introduced into safety systems and applications that create potential hazards. CRITERIA: Management should have a formal system of controls in place for assurance that all items procured meet the requirements for their intended use. Management should have a system of mechanisms to continuously maintain current, accurate, updated information on SC/Is and associated suppliers using all available sources. Management should have a training program with detailed records that

113

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis Documents (Documented Safety Analyses and Technical Safety Requirements)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 1996 February 1996 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 2 Date November 2005 DOE STANDARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS DOCUMENTS (DOCUMENTED SAFETY ANALYSES AND TECHNICAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS) U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, Fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Adminis tration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

114

Chapter 29 - Portfolio and Project Planning and Management in the Drug Discovery, Evaluation, Development, and Regulatory Review Process  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Drug discovery, evaluation, development, and regulatory review are complex, lengthy, and costly processes that involve in excess of 10,000 interdependent activities. In order to be successful in biopharmaceutical new product development, one needs a set of general principles that provide guidance in the construction of a Research and Development (R&D) Portfolio, the construction of individual Product Development Plans, and the subsequent updates required to keep the portfolio and product development plans current as learning occurs. The following five Principles of Optimal Product Development form the basis for defining a decision-based operational model, identifying and quantifying the critical information required at each major decision-point, projecting the probabilities of various outcomes, and informing key stakeholders (management, board, and investors) with the clear and concise status information that is needed for effective product development governance.

Charles Grudzinskas; Charles T. Gombar

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review AMENDMENT 45 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review FOR AMENDMENT 45 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GROUNDFISH OF THE GULF OF ALASKA AND THE ASSOCIATED REGULATORY AMENDMENT TO COMBINE THE THIRD AND FOURTH QUARTERLY POLLOCK ALLOWANCES IN THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL REGULATORY AREAS OF THE GULF OF ALASKA Prepared

116

A Research Review from the Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A Research Review from the Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University THE Johnson Scholar Fall 2013 | Volume 3, Issue 1 #12;THE Johnson Scholar Fall 2013 Volume 3 and Financial Times. Page 2 Dear Colleagues, Graduates, and Friends of Johnson at Cornell University, We

Chen, Tsuhan

117

Independent Oversight Review of the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Transportation Emergency Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rocky Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Transportation Emergency Management Program Independent Oversight Review of the March 2000 OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 4 2.0 RESULTS ......................................................................................... 6 Hazard Survey and Hazards Assessments .................................... 6 Program Plans and Procedures ..................................................... 7 Emergency Responder Performance and Preparation ............... 9 Offsite Interfaces ........................................................................... 10 Feedback and Continuous Improvement Process

118

Idaho National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management System FY 2012 Effectiveness Review and Declaration Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) performed an Annual Effectiveness Review of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), per 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 970.5223 1, “Integration of Environment, Safety and Health into Work Planning and Execution.” The annual review assessed Integrated Safety Management (ISM) effectiveness, provided feedback to maintain system integrity, and identified target areas for focused improvements and assessments for fiscal year (FY) 2013. Results of the FY 2012 annual effectiveness review demonstrated that the INL’s ISMS program was significantly strengthened. Actions implemented by the INL demonstrate that the overall Integrated Safety Management System is sound and ensures safe and successful performance of work while protecting workers, the public, and environment. This report also provides several opportunities for improvement that will help further strengthen the ISM Program and the pursuit of safety excellence. Demonstrated leadership and commitment, continued surveillance, and dedicated resources have been instrumental in maturing a sound ISMS program. Based upon interviews with personnel, reviews of assurance activities, and analysis of ISMS process implementation, this effectiveness review concludes that ISM is institutionalized and is “Effective”.

Farren Hunt

2012-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

119

Idaho National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management System 2011 Effectiveness Review and Declaration Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) performed an annual Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) effectiveness review per 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 970.5223-1, 'Integration of Environment, Safety and Health into Work Planning and Execution.' The annual review assessed Integrated Safety Management (ISM) effectiveness, provided feedback to maintain system integrity, and helped identify target areas for focused improvements and assessments for fiscal year (FY) 2012. The information presented in this review of FY 2011 shows that the INL has performed many corrective actions and improvement activities, which are starting to show some of the desired results. These corrective actions and improvement activities will continue to help change culture that will lead to better implementation of defined programs, resulting in moving the Laboratory's performance from the categorization of 'Needs Improvement' to the desired results of 'Effective Performance.'

Farren Hunt

2011-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

A Review of the Environmental Management Program (presented by the Top-to-Bottom Review Team)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

In 2002, at the direction of the Secretary of Energy, EM conducted a self-assessment of the overall status of the program under DOE Order 435.1 Radioactive Waste Management, and found a number of areas that needed improvement, including contract strategies and approaches; risk prioritization; and internal business practices.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Cough REVIEW Open Access Cough management: a practical approach  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Cough is one of the most common symptoms for which patients seek medical attention from primary care physicians and pulmonologists. Cough is an important defensive reflex that enhances the clearance of secretions and particles from the airways and protects the lower airways from the aspiration of foreign materials. Therapeutic suppression of cough may be either disease-specific or symptom related. The potential benefits of an early treatment of cough could include the prevention of the vicious cycle of cough. There has been a long tradition in acute cough, which is frequently due to upper respiratory tract infections, to use symptom-related anti-tussives. Suppression of cough (during chronic cough) may be achieved by disease-specific therapies, but in many patients it is often necessary to use symptomatic anti-tussives, too. According to the current guidelines of the American College of Chest Physician on “Cough Suppressants and Pharmacologic Protussive Therapy ” and additional clinical trials on the most frequent anti-tussive drugs, it should be possible to diagnose and treat cough successfully in a majority of cases. Among drugs used for the symptomatic treatment of cough, peripherally acting anti-tussives such as levodropropizine and moguisteine show the highest level of benefit and should be recommended especially in children. By improving our understanding of the specific effects of these anti-tussive agents, the therapeutic use of these drugs may be refined. The present review provides a summary of the most clinically relevant anti-tussive drugs in addition to their potential mechanism of action.

Francesco De Blasio; Johann C Virchow; Mario Polverino; Ro Zanasi; Panagiotis K Behrakis; Gunsely Kilinç; Rossella Balsamo; Gianluca De Danieli; Luigi Lanata

122

A Review of Information for Managing Aging in Nuclear Power Plants  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Age related degradation effects in safety related systems of nuclear power plants should be managed to prevent safety margins from eroding below the acceptable limits provided in plant design bases. The Nuclear Plant Aging Research (NPAR) Pro- gram, conducted under the auspices of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, and other related aging management programs are developing technical information on managing aging. The aging management process central to these efforts consists of three key elements: 1) selecting structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in which aging should be controlled; 2) understanding the mechanisms and rates of degradation in these SSCs; and 3) managing degradation through effective inspection, surveillance, condition monitoring, trending, record keeping, mainten- ance, refurbishment, replacement, and adjustments in the operating environment and service conditions. This document concisely reviews and integrates information developed under the NPAR Program and other aging management studies and other available information related to understanding and managing age-related degradation effects and provides specific refer- ences to more comprehensive information on the same subjects.

WC Morgan; JV Livingston

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Compliance With Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements (10 CFR Parts 1021 and 1022) - FR Notice, August 27, 2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

51429 51429 Vol. 68, No. 166 Wednesday, August 27, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 1021 and 1022 RIN 1901-AA94 Compliance With Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is revising its floodplain and wetland environmental review requirements to add flexibility and remove unnecessary procedural burdens by simplifying DOE public notification procedures for proposed floodplain and wetland actions, exempting additional actions from the floodplain and wetland assessment provisions of these regulations, providing for immediate action in an emergency, expanding the existing list of sources that may be used in determining the location of floodplains and wetlands, and allowing

124

Ecological Engineering 26 (2006) 626 Scientific requirements for ecosystem-based management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the foremost challenges for science and coastal management in the United States and, thereby, have important of ecosystem resilience offer some promising approaches. Precautionary management is best conceived with regard- ing scientific and management barriers to more effectively integrate science and management; (3

125

Review of Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During Closure Operations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-Environmental Management DOE - Complex Wide Review of Beryllium Management Practices at Rocky Flats During Closure Operations Challenge Beryllium (Be) metal is used by DOE in weapons production, as a reactor moderator or reflector, and as a fuel element cladding. Workers who are exposed to high concentrations of beryllium often develop acute beryllium disease caused by the inhalation of beryllium dust or particles which can cause Be sensitivity or chronic Be disease (CBD), a disabling and often fatal lung disease. A review of Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) Be practices put in place by Kaiser-Hill, the cleanup contractor, was initiated to determine the effectiveness of RFETS beryllium characterization and prevention programs and to determine what, if any, suggestions could be

126

Knowledge-based approaches in strategic management: a review of the literature  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Although Knowledge Management (KM) has been acknowledged as the most important resource and capability of an organisation, many academics' standpoints argue upon knowledge distinct characteristics. This paper is a critical review of KM literature and attempts to clarify different knowledge perspectives and offer a holistic picture of one of the most controversial issues to management science. We, first, build our critique on knowledge theory, explaining what knowledge is. Regarding different knowledge perspectives, such as Nonaka's, Tsoukas' and Blackler's, we attempt to clarify how knowledge interacts and is affected by their unique views. Second, we review KM theory according to the analysed knowledge perspectives. Finally, we categorise KM theory to three approaches: the cognitive, the community and the network approach, and we consider their impact to organisations.

Konstantinos C. Kostopoulos; Dimitrios A. Brachos; Sophia S. Philippidou; Ioannis N. Katsikis

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

127

Creating a methodology and tool to capture and resolve conflicts in developing software requirements: Requirement Lifecycle Modeling Views manager (RLMV)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for change. Fig. 2. The Revision View in RLMV The purpose of the Use Case View is to describe "the behavior of the system as seen by its end users, analysts, and testers" (Booch, Jacobson, and Rumbaugh, 1999). It does not specify the organization.... . Code Implementation. . User Interface. 4 9 13 13 FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS. 16 CONCLUSION. 17 REFERENCES. APPENDIX A. 19 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE I Requirement View implemented in RLMV. . . . . PAGE 2 Revision View implemented in RLMV...

Herrera, Leeha Rae-Lyn

2013-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

128

Renewable energy data requirements: A review of user opinions and data collection efforts  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Interest in the contribution of renewable energy to US energy supply is growing. This interest stems from environmental and energy security concerns and the desire to develop domestic resources. In order to plan for the use of renewable energy, data are essential to a variety of users both inside and outside the government. The purpose of this study is to identify priorities and requirements for gathering different types of renewable energy data. Results of this study are to be used by the US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA), in planning and evaluating its ongoing and future renewable energy information programs. The types of renewable energy addressed in this study include biomass (wood, agricultural residues, and crops grown for energy), municipal solid waste, geothermal energy, solar energy, and wind. To assess the relative importance of different types of information, we reviewed existing renewable energy data collection efforts and asked the opinions of renewable energy data users. Individuals in government, private industry, research organizations, industry trade associations, and public interest research groups were contacted and questioned about particular renewable energy data items. An analysis of their responses provides the basis for the conclusions in this report. The types of information; about which we asked each respondent included resource stock and flow information; quantities of energy inputs (e.g., wood) and outputs (e.g., electricity, heat); energy input and output costs and prices; numbers, location, and production capacities of energy conversion facilities; quantities and costs of energy conversion equipment; and quantities of pollutant emissions from energy conversion. 5 refs., 25 tabs.

Stevenson, G.G.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

Epigastric Hernia in Pregnancy: A Management Plan Based on a Systematic Review of Literature and a Case History  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Symptomatic epigastric hernia is rare in pregnant women. A case history, management of which prompted a systematic review of the literature and proposed plan for treatment of such cases, is hereby ... hernias in ...

Samuel A. Debrah; Amalachukwu M. Okpala

2013-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

A review of decision-making approaches to handle uncertainty and risk in adaptive forest management under climate change  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This review paper provides an overview of approaches to which we may resort for handling the complex decision problems involving uncertainty and risk that climate change implies for forest managers. Modelling ...

Rasoul Yousefpour; Jette Bredahl Jacobsen…

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

2007 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance for EPACT 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Final  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Requirement Guidance for EPACT 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Final Prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program January 28, 2008 Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance for EPACT 2005 and EO 13423 Contents 1. Authority ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Energy Policy Act of 2005 .................................................................................... 1 1.2 Executive Order 13423 ........................................................................................ 1 1.3 Guidance...............................................................................................................

132

2007 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance for EPACT 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Final  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Requirement Guidance for EPACT 2005 and Executive Order 13423 Final Prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program January 28, 2008 Federal Renewable Energy Requirement Guidance for EPACT 2005 and EO 13423 Contents 1. Authority ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Energy Policy Act of 2005 .................................................................................... 1 1.2 Executive Order 13423 ........................................................................................ 1 1.3 Guidance...............................................................................................................

133

Tethys: The Marine and Hydrokinetic Technology Environmental Impacts Knowledge Management System -- Requirements Specification -- Version 1.0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The marine and hydrokinetic (MHK) environmental impacts knowledge management system (KMS), dubbed Tethys after the mythical Greek goddess of the seas, is being developed for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Wind and Hydropower Technologies Program (WHTP) by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). This requirements specification establishes the essential capabilities required of Tethys and clarifies for WHTP and the Tethys development team the results that must be achieved by the system.

Butner, R. Scott; Snowden-Swan, Lesley J.; Ellis, Peter C.

2010-11-09T23:59:59.000Z

134

Proceedings of Student/Faculty Research Day, CSIS, Pace University, May 4th Story-Wall: Lightweight Requirements Management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-Wall: Lightweight Requirements Management for Agile Software Development Lorena Delgadillo Senior Year Honors-driven and used by large organizations undertaking traditional forms of software development. While, there are some fundamental practices supported by these tools that play a role in more agile forms of software

Tappert, Charles

135

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: High Energy High Power Battery Exceeding PHEV-40 Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation given by [company name] at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about high energy high power battery...

136

Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This report describes the opportunities for improvement identified in DOE’s review, and provides recommendations for short-term and long-term actions for improving safety at DOE nuclear facilities.

137

Independent Oversight Review, Y-12 National Security Complex...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Complex - March 2014 March 2014 Review of the Uranium Processing Facility Project Design Requirements and Configuration Management Program This report documents the results of...

138

Environmental Management Construction Project Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility, July 19-22, 210  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Shadowing of the Environmental Management Construction Project Review of the Savannah River Site Salt Waste Processing Facility on July 19-22, 2010 A Department of Energy Construction Project Review (CPR) of the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) project was conducted on July 19-22, 2010, at the request of the Principal Deputy Secretary, Office of Environmental Management (EM-2). The purpose of the review was to assess the cost, schedule, and technical progress against the approved Performance Baseline. Specific review areas were Engineering; Commissioning; Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality Assurance; Cost, Schedule, and Risk; and Management and Acquisition.

139

National Disaster Resilience Competition Webinar Series- Q&A Session: Review Completeness Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

In light of the recent announcement of the National Disaster Resilience Competition (NDRC), HUD is offering a series of webinars to discuss NDRC NOFA requirements, answer NDRC NOFA questions and...

140

Readiness Review Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Review Program Review Program FUNCTIONAL AREA GOAL: DOE/NNSA Headquarters and Field organizations and their contractors responsible for the startup and operation of nuclear facilities have defined and implemented contractual requirements to manage, evaluate, and approve the startup and restart of nuclear facilities and activities. REQUIREMENTS:  DOE Order 425.1C, Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities  DOE P 450.4, Safety Management System Policy  DOE/NNSA Safety Management Functions, Responsibilities and Authorities Manual Guidance:  DOE-STD-3006-2000, Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews  DOE-HDBK- 3012-2003, Operational Readiness Review Team Leaders Handbook  DOE G 450.4-1B, Integrated Safety Management System Guide

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems - Current status and potential improvements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer GHG-emissions from different treatment alternatives vary largely in 25 reviewed comparative LCAs of bio-waste management. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer System-boundary settings often vary largely in reviewed studies. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Existing LCA guidelines give varying recommendations in relation to several key issues. - Abstract: Twenty-five comparative cycle assessments (LCAs) addressing food waste treatment were reviewed, including the treatment alternatives landfill, thermal treatment, compost (small and large scale) and anaerobic digestion. The global warming potential related to these treatment alternatives varies largely amongst the studies. Large differences in relation to setting of system boundaries, methodological choices and variations in used input data were seen between the studies. Also, a number of internal contradictions were identified, many times resulting in biased comparisons between alternatives. Thus, noticed differences in global warming potential are not found to be a result of actual differences in the environmental impacts from studied systems, but rather to differences in the performance of the study. A number of key issues with high impact on the overall global warming potential from different treatment alternatives for food waste were identified through the use of one-way sensitivity analyses in relation to a previously performed LCA of food waste management. Assumptions related to characteristics in treated waste, losses and emissions of carbon, nutrients and other compounds during the collection, storage and pretreatment, potential energy recovery through combustion, emissions from composting, emissions from storage and land use of bio-fertilizers and chemical fertilizers and eco-profiles of substituted goods were all identified as highly relevant for the outcomes of this type of comparisons. As the use of LCA in this area is likely to increase in coming years, it is highly relevant to establish more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potentials for cross-study comparisons.

Bernstad, A., E-mail: anna.bernstad@chemeng.lth.se [Water and Environmental Engineering at the Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Chemical Centre, 221 00 Lund (Sweden); Cour Jansen, J. la [Water and Environmental Engineering at the Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Chemical Centre, 221 00 Lund (Sweden)

2012-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

142

Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events, August 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has established a rigorous nuclear safety regulatory infrastructure for the protection of workers, the public, and the environment. Part of this infrastructure includes processes for evaluating events to foster continuous improvement. In this spirit, DOE (including the National Nuclear Security Administration) took actions to review the safety of its nuclear facilities and identify opportunities for improvement in light of the March 2011 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.

143

Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—a review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Important decisions of mankind have for centuries been made using voting techniques, both in small groups and in nationwide elections. Currently, involvement of public in forestry decision making is seen as an important part of sustainable forest management, both as a means to an end and as an end in itself. In public participatory processes, issues such as fairness, representativity, and transparency are important, as well as in any election. Therefore, it is natural to utilise the achievements of voting theory also in decision support for sustainable forest management. In this article, first a review of basic voting techniques is given, along with some new techniques involving elements of fuzziness or randomness. Second, modifications of voting for multicriteria decision aid are presented and, finally, applications of voting to natural resources management are described. The applicability of voting approaches to the group decision support and participatory planning of forestry are discussed. The most significant advantages of voting methods for this kind of decision support processes were found to be their ability to deal with ordinal preferences of decision makers and ordinal evaluation data on alternatives. In addition, voting methods are comprehensive and easy to interpret. This makes the decision support process transparent and quick and convenient to implement even with large groups of people, and via information networks.

Annika Kangas; Sanna Laukkanen; Jyrki Kangas

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

144

Establishment of review groups on US Department of Energy Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A primary purpose of this grant was the establishment of expert research review groups to help facilitate expanded and improved communications and information among states, public, federal agencies, contractors, and DOE, relative to national environmental and waste management issues/problems. The general objectives of this grant were: Research on the further participation avenues of industry and academia and provide appropriate research documentation concerning the implementation of multi-party agreements; Analysis of the impediments that delay the accomplishment of agreements between states and the federal government for environmental compliance, as well as an assessment of the public need for research because of the above agreements; Analysis of the impact of environmental actions on states, industry, academia, public and other federal agencies; Provide research to help facilitate an interactive system that provides the various involved parties the capability and capacity to strengthen their commitment to national environmental and waste management goals and objectives; and Furthering research of public education in the environmental arena and research of needed national education resources in scientific and technical areas related to environmental restoration and waste management.

Eyman, L.D.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

National Disaster Resilience Competition Webinar Series- Q&A Session: Review Completeness Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is hosting the National Disaster Resilience Competition Webinar Series to foster awareness about the National Disaster Resilience Competition. The webinar will answer questions about the competition, cover eligibility and requirements, and talk about climate resilience.

146

Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Proposed Amendment 86 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Regulatory Impact Review for Proposed Amendment 86 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering sea/Aleutian Islands

147

Assessing the effect of requirement definition and management on performance outcomes: Role of interpersonal conflict, product advantage and project type  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Early planning in many cases is not performed well in new product development (NPD). Most NPD literature has focused more on the product rather than on the development process (Funk, 1992). Thus, the primary purpose of this research was to investigate the relationships among requirement definition and management (RDM) practice, interpersonal conflict, product advantage, and NPD performance in terms of project and market performance. The structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was used to validate the research model. The results suggest that RDM practice in terms of RDM implementation process and training & improvement is associated with requirement quality and stability. The findings also indicate that the number of groups moderates the relationship between requirement quality & stability and project performance.

Li-Ren Yang; Jieh-Haur Chen; Xing-Liang Wang

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Participation of wind power plants in system frequency control: Review of grid code requirements and control methods  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Active power reserves are needed for the proper operation of an electrical system. These reserves are continuously regulated in order to match the generation and consumption in the system and thus, to maintain a constant electrical frequency. They are usually provided by synchronized conventional generating units such as hydraulic or thermal power plants. With the progressive displacement of these generating plants by non-synchronized renewable-based power plants (e.g. wind and solar) the net level of synchronous power reserves in the system becomes reduced. Therefore, wind power plants are required, according to some European Grid Codes, to also provide power reserves like conventional generating units do. This paper focuses not only on the review of the requirements set by Grid Codes, but also on control methods of wind turbines for their participation in primary frequency control and synthetic inertia.

Francisco Díaz-González; Melanie Hau; Andreas Sumper; Oriol Gomis-Bellmunt

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Integrated Safety Management System Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This manual provides requirements and guidance for DOE and contractors to ensure development and implementation of an effective Integrated Safety Management system that is periodically reviewed and continuously improved. Canceled by DOE O 450.2.

2006-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

Independent management and financial review, Yucca Mountain Project, Nevada. Final report, Appendix  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425), as amended by Public Law 100-203, December 22, 1987, established the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) within the Department of Energy (DOE), and directed the Office to investigate a site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, to determine if this site is suitable for the construction of a repository for the disposal of high level nuclear waste. Work on site characterization has been under way for several years. Thus far, about $1.47 billion have been spent on Yucca Mountain programs. This work has been funded by Congressional appropriations from a Nuclear Waste Fund to which contributions have been made by electric utility ratepayers through electric utilities generating power from nuclear power stations. The Secretary of Energy and the Governor of the State of Nevada have appointed one person each to a panel to oversee an objective, independent financial and management evaluation of the Yucca Mountain Project. The Requirements for the work will include an analysis of (1) the Yucca Mountain financial and, contract management techniques and controls; (2) Project schedules and credibility of the proposed milestones; (3) Project organizational effectiveness and internal planning processes, and (4) adequacy of funding levels and funding priorities, including the cost of infrastructure and scientific studies. The recipient will provide monthly progress report and the following reports/documents will be presented as deliverables under the contract: (1) Financial and Contract Management Preliminary Report; (2) Project Scheduling Preliminary Report; (3)Project Organizational Effectiveness Preliminary Report; (4) Project Funding Levels and Funding Priorities Preliminary Report; and (5) Final Report.

NONE

1995-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

151

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (EM)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MANAGEMENT (EM) MANAGEMENT (EM) OBJECTIVE EM.1 A routine drill program and emergency operations drill program, including program records, have,been established and implemented. (Core Requirement 11) Criteria 1. Emergency preparedness drills and exercises are conducted and an adequate response capability,exists. 2. Routine operations drills and exercises are conducted and an adequate response capability exists. 3. Applicable emergency management documentation (e.g., Building Emergency Plan, emergency,response procedures, Emergency Preparedness Hazards Assessment, alarm response procedures,,and emergency response procedures) has been updated to reflect implementation of the TA-55 . Approach Record Reviews: Review the emergency management documents (e.g., Building

152

REVIEWS  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......December 1959 book-review REVIEWS REVIEWS E. S. PEARSON The Advanced...433 . 84s. [491 ] REVIEWS The Advanced Theory of...the same comprehensive standard, three volumes will...inserted in the original plan at this half-way stage......

E. S. PEARSON

1959-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

153

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review Reviews Reviews Factors for One-sided...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...Pp. 412 . 5.00. Reviews 293 Handbook of Nonparametric...for Variables Sampling Plans. By D. B. OWEN. Sandia...expected value ft and standard deviation cr/^/n......

Reviews

1964-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

154

2008 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada: Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site requires an annual review to assess the adequacy of the Performance Assessments (PAs) and Composite Analyses (CAs) for each of the facilities, with the results submitted annually to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters. The Disposal Authorization Statements for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) also require that such reviews be made and that secondary or minor unresolved issues be tracked and addressed as part of the maintenance plan. The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) performed an annual review in fiscal year (FY) 2008 by evaluating operational factors and research results that impact the continuing validity of the PAs and CAs. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2008 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R&D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada Test Site relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R&D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs.

NSTec Environmental Management

2009-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

155

Review Draft Review Draft  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Review Draft Review Draft Columbia Basin White Sturgeon Planning Framework Prepared a favorable review of specific sturgeon projects but noted that an effective basin-wide management plan passage. A planning framework (this document) was drafted based on a review and synthesis of published

156

Review of Strategies and Technologies for Demand-Side Management on Isolated Mini-Grids  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technologies for Demand-Side Management on Isolated Mini-technologies used for demand- side management (DSM) on mini-can provide additional demand-side management based on the

Harper, Meg

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

Home: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages

content. | Skip to navigation content. | Skip to navigation Site Map Contact Us Current Documents Archived Documents Entire Site only in current section Advanced Search... U.S. Department of Energy Office of Management Directives, Delegations, and Requirements Sections Home Directives Current Directives Draft Directives Archives Delegations Current Delegations Current Designations Rescinded Organizations' Assignment of Responsibility Development & Review RevCom Writers' Tools DPC Corner References News and Updates Help Personal tools You are here: Office of Management » Directives, Delegations, and Requirements Info Home Directives are the Department of Energy's primary means of establishing policies, requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. Directive

158

Nutrient Management Educational & Planning Resources The Pennsylvania Nutrient Management Education Program provides a wide array of resources  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

consistently in the development and review of nutrient management plans. There are two comprehensive Planning References are used extensively by nutrient management specialists while developing and reviewing. Included are the required standard formats for both the nutrient management plan and nutrient balance

Guiltinan, Mark

159

Characterization of options and their analysis requirements for the long-term management of depleted uranium hexafluoride  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) is examining alternative strategies for the long-term management of depleted uranium hexafluoride (UF{sub 6}) currently stored at the gaseous diffusion plants at Portsmouth, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky, and on the Oak Ridge Reservation in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This paper describes the methodology for the comprehensive and ongoing technical analysis of the options being considered. An overview of these options, along with several of the suboptions being considered, is presented. The long-term management strategy alternatives fall into three broad categories: use, storage, or disposal. Conversion of the depleted UF6 to another form such as oxide or metal is needed to implement most of these alternatives. Likewise, transportation of materials is an integral part of constructing the complete pathway between the current storage condition and ultimate disposition. The analysis of options includes development of pre-conceptual designs; estimates of effluents, wastes, and emissions; specification of resource requirements; and preliminary hazards assessments. The results of this analysis will assist DOE in selecting a strategy by providing the engineering information necessary to evaluate the environmental impacts and costs of implementing the management strategy alternatives.

Dubrin, J.W.; Rosen, R.S.; Zoller, J.N.; Harri, J.W.; Schwertz, N.L.

1995-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

DOE-STD-1082-94; DOE Standard Preparation, Review, and Approval of Implementaiton Plans For Nuclear Safety Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

82-94 82-94 October 1994 DOE STANDARD PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY REQUIREMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615)576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE95001461 DOE-STD-1082-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) technical standard has been prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of Steve

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

REVIEWS:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......The Software IP Detective's Handbook: Measurement, Comparison...format, so each IT Manager's Handbook (3rd ed) Holtsnider & Ja...to cover. The IT Managers Handbook proved to be one of these books...member personalities as it does to managing software licenses......

Book of the Month ? IT Manager's Handbook (3rd ed) ? HTML5 Cookbook ? Leaders in Computing ? Adopting Open Source Software ? The Software IP Detective's Handbook: Measurement; Comparison; Infringement Detection ? The Essential Guide to Home Computer Security

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

162

A review of demand-side management policy in the UK  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Demand-side management (DSM) refers to actions undertaken on the demand side of energy metres. A broad definition of DSM is proposed to include current policy objectives for emissions reduction, energy security and affordability, and encompasses energy efficiency, demand response, and on-site back-up generation and storage. The paper reviews the concept of DSM, outlines the historical impacts of DSM globally since the energy crises of the 1970s, analyses UK DSM policy, and examines the influence of EU Directives on UK DSM policy, as the country is currently deciding on how to include the demand-side in its Electricity Market Reform proposals and wider energy policy. Much of the focus of previous research has been on DSM technological trials and modelling studies rather than DSM policy and the paper contributes to filling this gap. Policy recommendations for the UK context are discussed, and it is clear that the success of DSM policies is determined primarily by regulatory support and utility financial incentives. It is important that policy clarity is provided and that current and new policies do not overlap.

Peter Warren

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

163

Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Much research has been conducted in prognostics and health management (PHM), an emerging field in mechanical engineering that is gaining interest from both academia and industry. Most of these efforts have been in the area of machinery PHM, resulting in the development of many algorithms for this particular application. The majority of these algorithms concentrate on applications involving common rotary machinery components, such as bearings and gears. Knowledge of this prior work is a necessity for any future research efforts to be conducted; however, there has not been a comprehensive overview that details previous and on-going efforts in PHM. In addition, a systematic method for developing and deploying a PHM system has yet to be established. Such a method would enable rapid customization and integration of PHM systems for diverse applications. To address these gaps, this paper provides a comprehensive review of the PHM field, followed by an introduction of a systematic PHM design methodology, 5S methodology, for converting data to prognostics information. This methodology includes procedures for identifying critical components, as well as tools for selecting the most appropriate algorithms for specific applications. Visualization tools are presented for displaying prognostics information in an appropriate fashion for quick and accurate decision making. Industrial case studies are included in this paper to show how this methodology can help in the design of an effective PHM system.

Jay Lee; Fangji Wu; Wenyu Zhao; Masoud Ghaffari; Linxia Liao; David Siegel

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

164

Human-computer interaction requirements for abnormal situation management in industrial processes  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Honeywell is leading a multiyear effort to identify the causes of and propose solutions for abnormal situations in industrial processes. The authors define abnormal situations as those that necessitate human intervention because the automated distributed control system (DCS) cannot maintain the plant in an appropriate operating state. These situations are clearly of concern in the process industry because of their impact on revenues, human safety, and the environment. Interactions between the DCS and operating personnel are critical to mitigating abnormal situations in chemical plants. With the collaboration of major petrochemical and oil refining industries, Honeywell conducted on-site evaluations of the operating environments of various types of processes. Through this effort they identified process, equipment, people, and work context factors that contribute to abnormal situations. This paper describes human-computer interaction solution requirements based on the on-site plant evaluations. The results are discussed in terms of improvements to human-computer interactions and user interfaces and enhancements to conventional computer-based DCSs.

Soken, N.; Bullemer, P.; Ramanathan, P.; Reinhart, W. [Honeywell Inc., Minneapolis, MN (United States). Honeywell Technology Center

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

165

MANAGEMENT (MNG)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

and recommendations is adequately implemented. (DOE Order 414.1A, Criterion 3; 10 CFR 830, Subpart A) Approach Record Review * Review the SWS issues management systems and...

167

Requirements Review Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Research) Ben Allen, LANL (Bioinformatics) Greg Bell, ESnet (Networking) David Benton, GLBRCUniversity of Wisconsin (Informatics) Tom Brettin, ORNL (Bioinformatics) Shane Canon,...

168

DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2003; Chemical Management (Volume 3 of 3) Consolidated Chemical User Safety and Health Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TS TS NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2003 DOE HANDBOOK CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT (Volume 3 of 3) Consolidated Chemical User Safety and Health Requirements U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. September 2003 DOE-HDBK-1139/3-2003 This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. It is available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. It is available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

169

Co-products from a biofuel production chain in crop disease management: A review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The economic importance of biofuel industrial production chains will increase in the coming years and will be a promising source of co-products that are useful for sustainable farming systems. However, the use of co-products that are obtained from the biofuel production chains, especially for crop disease management, is an under-explored area in the research community. The liquid and solid co-products that are related to the biofuel outputs of particular interest in crop protection are 1) oil-less seed meals and glycerin derived from the biodiesel chain, 2) steam-exploded liquid waste derived from a 2nd-generation bioethanol chain, and 3) charcoal (bio-char) obtained from the pyrolysis of plant biomass. It is interesting to include the suppressive composts that are obtained by composting agricultural waste and the exhausted biomasses originating from the different biofuel chains. This overview summarizes the nature, the effects, the mechanisms, the possible applications, and the use in crop protection of the most important solid and liquid co-products that are obtained from industrial processes, focusing on 2nd-generation biofuel outputs to control economically important plant diseases that are caused by soil-borne pathogens. The aim of this work is to review the available studies on the employment perspectives of biofuel chain co-products in crop protection by distinguishing the two concepts that are most important in sustainable farming systems: 1) the possible effects of these organic inputs in terms of interaction with beneficial soil microbial populations and 2) the possible relationships of these organic inputs in terms of interaction with the physiological and ecological processes of the crop–pathogen systems. This distinction will permit a good definition of the potential advantages of biofuel chain co-products with respect to the traditional organic amendments that are usually used in crop protection. It is evident from this review that biofuel chain co-products have great potential but sometimes give inconsistent disease control, which limits their use in crop protection. There is no doubt that the benefits of biofuel chain co-products outweigh their drawbacks, but the impact of this approach on pathogen populations and disease suppression is often unpredictable.

Ugo De Corato; Catello Pane; Giovanni Luigi Bruno; Fernando Antonio Cancellara; Massimo Zaccardelli

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ............................................................................................................................1 2 Regulatory Impact Review FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

171

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SECRETARIAL REVIEW REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AND INITIAL REGULATORY ..............................................................................................................................................1 2 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For proposed Amendment 88 to the Gulf of Alaska Fishery Management Plan CENTRAL GULF

172

Pennsylvania Nutrient Management Specialist Certification Program  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and overview to the Act 38 regulatory requirements for nutrient management planning. During this session key for the Plan Writing and Plan Review Workshops. Stormwater & P Index Workshop April 17-18, 2013 All commercial nutrient management planning resources are distributed. #12;v.06.2011 Managing Manure Nutrients Workshop

Guiltinan, Mark

173

Review of industry efforts to manage pressurized water reactor feedwater nozzle, piping, and feedring cracking and wall thinning  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents a review of nuclear industry efforts to manage thermal fatigue, flow-accelerated corrosion, and water hammer damage to pressurized water reactor (PWR) feedwater nozzles, piping, and feedrings. The review includes an evaluation of design modifications, operating procedure changes, augmented inspection and monitoring programs, and mitigation, repair and replacement activities. Four actions were taken: (a) review of field experience to identify trends of operating events, (b) review of technical literature, (c) visits to PWR plants and a PWR vendor, and (d) solicitation of information from 8 other countries. Assessment of field experience is that licensees have apparently taken sufficient action to minimize feedwater nozzle cracking caused by thermal fatigue and wall thinning of J-tubes and feedwater piping. Specific industry actions to minimize the wall-thinning in feedrings and thermal sleeves were not found, but visual inspection and necessary repairs are being performed. Assessment of field experience indicates that licensees have taken sufficient action to minimize steam generator water hammer in both top-feed and preheat steam generators. Industry efforts to minimize multiple check valve failures that have allowed backflow of steam from a steam generator and have played a major role in several steam generator water hammer events were not evaluated. A major finding of this review is that analysis, inspection, monitoring, mitigation, and replacement techniques have been developed for managing thermal fatigue and flow-accelerated corrosion damage to feedwater nozzles, piping, and feedrings. Adequate training and appropriate applications of these techniques would ensure effective management of this damage.

Shah, V.N.; Ware, A.G.; Porter, A.M.

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......of organizing computations (though he does not discuss the product form of the inverse...theory. It reads with the drynesa of a handbook. This does not detract from Reviews 479 ita value; as a handbook it is excellent and the reviewer has no......

J. G. SAW

1961-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Low-level waste management in the South. Task 4. 2 - long-term care requirements. [Shallow land burial  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper provides an analysis of the long-term care requirements of low-level radioactive waste disposal facilities. Among the topics considered are the technical requirements for long-term care, the experiences of the three inactive and three active commercial disposal facilities concerning perpetual care and maintenance, and the financial management of a perpetual care fund. In addition, certain recommendations for the establishment of a perpetual care fund are provided. The predominant method of disposing of low-level radioactive wastes is shallow land burial. After studying alternative methods of disposal, the U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) concluded that there are no compelling reasons for abandoning this disposal method. Of the 22 shallow land burial facilities in the U.S., the federal government maintains 14 active and two inactive disposal sites. There are three active (Barnwell, South Carolina; Hanford, Washington; and Beatty, Nevada) and three inactive commercial disposal facilities (Maxey Flats, Kentucky; Sheffield, Illinois; and West Valley, New York). The life of a typical facility can be broken into five phases: preoperational, operational, closure, postclosure observation and maintenance, and institutional control. Long-term care of a shallow land burial facility will begin with the disposal site closure phase and continue through the postclosure observation and maintenance and institutional control phases. Since the postclosure observation and maintenance phase will last about five years and the institutional control phase 100 years, the importance of a well planned long-term care program is apparent. 26 references, 1 table.

Not Available

1983-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand - Tim Mount  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Evaluating the Effects of Managing Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy Resources Locally on System Performance and Costs Tim Mount and Ray Zimmerman Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Alejandro Dominguez-Garcia Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign CERTS Review, Cornell, August 7-8, 2012 An NSF I/UCRC Collaborative Research on the Smart Grid PSERC Researchers at Cornell Engineers Economists Lindsay Anderson Wooyoung Jeon* Hsiao-Dong Chiang Alberto Lamadrid* Andrew Hunter Jung Youn Mo* Bob Thomas Surin Maneevitjit* Lang Tong Tim Mount Max Zhang Dick Schuler Ray Zimmerman Bill Schulze + Hao Lu* Judy Cardell, Smith College +

177

Quality Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Quality Management Quality Management Quality Management The Office of Quality Management, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security develops policies and procedures to ensure the classification and control of information is effective and consistent. The Office of Quality Management also assists other Government agencies to meet the requirements contained in DOE-issued regulations concerning Restricted Data and Formerly Restricted Data. To meet these missions, the Office of Quality Management: Develops and revises DOE Regulations and Orders concerning Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, Transclassified Foreign Nuclear Information, National Security Information, Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information, and Official Use Only Responds to Mandatory Declassification Review Requests under

178

REVIEW:  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Computers Reviewers, 2011 Stefan Agamanolis, United Kingdom Rosa Alarcon, Chile Frances Aldrich, United Kingdom Jason Alexander, United Kingdom Norman Alm, United Kingdom Analia Amandi, Argentina Chee Siang Ang, United Kingdom Alissa Antle......

Reviewers; Editors Appreciation 2011

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

Focused Review of Emergency Management at the Kansas City Plant - Volume II  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Management at the Emergency Management at the Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance ISM Volume II OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ..............................................................................1 2.0 Results ......................................................................................3 3.0 Conclusions ..............................................................................5 4.0 Ratings ......................................................................................7 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ..................9 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS ............................10 APPENDIX C - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BASIS, PLAN, AND PROCEDURES .................................... 11 APPENDIX D - HAZARDS SURVEY AND HAZARDS

180

CALS Research Division/Scientific Peer Review May 2013 In recent months, the CALS Research Division has seen an increase in the number of USDA RFP's requiring a "Scientific Peer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CALS Research Division/Scientific Peer Review May 2013 In recent months, the CALS Research Division has seen an increase in the number of USDA RFP's requiring a "Scientific Peer Review." This internal review until the time of award, a PI may request a delay in submitting the peer review until a later date

Balser, Teri C.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Legacy Management Support Team- January 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Evaluation to determine whether Legacy Management Support Team is continuing to perform at a level deserving DOE-VPP Star recognition.

182

Review of Strategies and Technologies for Demand-Side Management on Isolated Mini-Grids  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

demand- side management (DSM) on mini-grids throughout theunderpin the need to employ DSM to reduce load or spreadand technologies for DSM vary. As described above, one

Harper, Meg

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the DOE...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

in the event of an accident or emergency. Following a chemical explosion at DOE's Hanford site in May 1997, an independent oversight evaluation of emergency management...

184

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Trip Prediction and Route-Based Vehicle Energy Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation given by Argonne National Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about trip prediction...

185

OVTP Merit Review EPAct State & Alternative Fuel Provider Data Collection and Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation from the U.S. DOE Office of Vehicle Technologies "Mega" Merit Review 2008 on February 25, 2008 in Bethesda, Maryland.

186

Review of the Los Alamos National Laoratory Nuclear Facility Coonfiguration Management Program - March 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nuclear Facility Nuclear Facility Configuration Management Program March 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

187

Review of the Los Alamos National Laoratory Nuclear Facility Coonfiguration Management Program - March 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Nuclear Facility Nuclear Facility Configuration Management Program March 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 2

188

Managing uncertainty: a review of food system scenario analysis and modelling  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...constraints on the demand side, balance-of-payments...intervene in the management of reserve stocks...exploit supply-side yield gaps where...import to satisfy food demand. Three regions have...Rigorous and transparent management of uncertainty is...

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

Transmittal Memorandum, Report on Review of Requirements and Capabilities for Analyzing and Responding to Beyond Design Basis Events, September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The March 2011 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the Department of Energy (DOE) took several actions to review the safety of its nuclear facilities.

190

Emergency Management Program Inspection Criteria, Approach, and Lines of Inquiry - Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events, January 3, 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of17 of17 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Criteria Review and Approach Document Subject: Emergency Management Program Inspection Criteria, Approach, and Lines of Inquiry Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events HS: HSS CRAD 45-56 Rev: 0 Eff. Date: January 3, 2013 Page I of 17 Acting birector, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Date: January 3, 2013 Crit~ria Le!d, Jim~~ gency Management Date: January 3, 2013 1.0 PURPOSE Within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), the Office of Enforcement and Oversight, Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations' mission is to assess the effectiveness of those emergency management systems and practices used by site/facility organizations in implementing its

191

September 1, 2011 Review of Resident Fish, Data Management and Program Coordination  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) and Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) will begin the category review of all projects regarding. The scientific and administrative review for the category enables the Council and Bonneville to make long for Fiscal Years 2013-2017 Dear Project Proponents: The Northwest Power and Conservation Council (Council

192

Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project, July 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Review of Independent Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project July 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Scope .........................................................................................................................................1 3.0 Background ...............................................................................................................................2

193

Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project, July 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Independent Review of Independent Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project July 2011 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Scope .........................................................................................................................................1 3.0 Background ...............................................................................................................................2

194

Network Requirements Workshop - Documents and Background Materials  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science...

195

Quality Managment Program (QMP) report: A review of quality management programs developed in response to Title 10, Section 35.32 of the Code of Federal Regulations  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In July of 1991, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission published a Final Rule in the Federal Register amending regulations governing medical therapeutic administrations of byproduct material and certain uses of radioactive sodium iodide. These amendments required implementation of a Quality Management Program (QMP) to provide high confidence that the byproduct material -- or radiation from byproduct material -- will be administered as directed by an authorized user physician. Herein, this rule is referred to as the QM rule. The Final Rule was published after two proposed rules had been published in the Federal Register.

Witte, M.C.

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

196

Review of Management of Safety Systems at the Hanford Tank Farms...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

of liquid or semi-solid radioactive and chemical waste stored in 177 underground tanks at the Hanford Site. ORP serves as DOE line management for two functions: the Tank...

197

The use of systematic reviews to analyse demand-side management policy  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Demand-side management (DSM) seeks to reduce overall energy ... change when energy is used to reduce peak demands and smooth the load curve. DSM is ... and carbon emissions reduction. However, the policy side of ...

Peter Warren

2014-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

Quality Assurance Management System Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides information on principles and practices used to establish and implement an effective quality assurance program or quality management system in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 830. Cancels DOE G 414.1-2. Canceled by DOE G 414.1-2B.

2005-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

199

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Look-Ahead Driver Feedback and Powertrain Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation given by Eaton at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about look-ahead driver feedback and...

200

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Stand-Alone Battery Thermal Management System  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation given by DENSO International America, Inc. at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about stand-alone...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Project Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Peer Reviews Project Peer Reviews ProjectPeerReviews.pdf More Documents & Publications IndependentPeerReviewProgram.pdf Peer Review EERE Program Management Guide - Appendix D...

202

Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations - Guidance Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Guidance Documents Guidance Documents Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office Protocols Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for the Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents, July 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for High Hazard Nuclear Facility Project Oversight, November 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for Required Reading, June 2012 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for Small Team Oversight Activities, June 2012 (Rev. 1) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Qualification Standard for the Site Lead Program, May 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for Site Leads, May 2011

203

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review For Amendment 99 to the Fishery Management Plan ..................................................................................................... iii 1.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW................................................................................................................1 1.1.1 What is a Regulatory Impact Review

204

The Bachelor of Management degree in Management Information Systems is a minimum of 40 courses in length. Admission to the Faculty may occur at the end of Year One. Students are required to have the following courses for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Bachelor of Management degree in Management Information Systems is a minimum of 40 courses-language university. BachelorofManagement ManagementInformationSystems Name Technology Management 4090 - Management Policy and Strategy Management 4840 - Systems Analysis Management

Seldin, Jonathan P.

205

Quality Assurance Source Requirements Traceability Database  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

At the Yucca Mountain Project the Project Requirements Processing System assists in the management of relationships between regulatory and national/industry standards source criteria, and Quality Assurance Requirements and Description document (DOE/R W-0333P) requirements to create compliance matrices representing respective relationships. The matrices are submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to assist in the commission's review, interpretation, and concurrence with the Yucca Mountain Project QA program document. The tool is highly customized to meet the needs of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Office of Quality Assurance.

MURTHY, R., NAYDENOVA, A., DEKLEVER, R., BOONE, A.

2006-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

206

2012 SG Peer Review - Recovery Act: Enhanced Demand and Distribution Management Regional Demonstration - Craig Miller, NRECA  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Enhanced Distribution and Demand Management Enhanced Distribution and Demand Management Regional Demonstration Craig Miller Cooperative Research Network National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 8 June 2012 December 2008 Project Title Objective Life-cycle Funding ($K) $68 million with match Hardware: $43 million Research: $11.6 Co-op Labor: $13.4 Technical Scope * 23 Co-ops, Distributed Nationally * 275,000 components deployed * Meters & DR * Distribution Automation * Infrastructure * In home displays and web portals * Demand response over AMI * Prepaid metering * Interactive thermal storage * Electrical storage (20x10kWh, 1MWh 0.5MWh) * Renewable energy * Smart feeder switching * Conservation voltage reduction * Advanced metering infrastructure * Meter data management * Communications infrastructure * SCADA To advance the deployment of the smart grid

207

Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......world, it has to be questioned as soon as logic is used as a vehicle in pursuing another goal, that of artificial intelligence...suggests that the performance of these is determined by the ecological requirements of the animal, so that the brain topology is......

CHRIS MOSS

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Demand side management in smart grid: A review and proposals for future direction  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract This paper mainly focuses on demand side management and demand response, including drivers and benefits, shiftable load scheduling methods and peak shaving techniques. Demand side management techniques found in literature are overviewed and a novel electricity demand control technique using real-time pricing is proposed. Currently users have no means to change their power consumption to benefit the whole system. The proposed method consists of modern system identification and control that would enable user side load control. This would potentially balance demand side with supply side more effectively and would also reduce peak demand and make the whole system more efficient.

Linas Gelazanskas; Kelum A.A. Gamage

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Management Energy Management Guidance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation Notices & Rules Guidance Facility Reporting Fleet Reporting Energy Management Guidance The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides guidance on Federal

210

Establishment of review groups on US Department of Energy Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Program. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A primary purpose of this grant was the establishment of expert research review groups to help facilitate expanded and improved communications and information among states, public, federal agencies, contractors, and DOE, relative to national environmental and waste management issues/problems. The general objectives of this grant were: Research on the further participation avenues of industry and academia and provide appropriate research documentation concerning the implementation of multi-party agreements; Analysis of the impediments that delay the accomplishment of agreements between states and the federal government for environmental compliance, as well as an assessment of the public need for research because of the above agreements; Analysis of the impact of environmental actions on states, industry, academia, public and other federal agencies; Provide research to help facilitate an interactive system that provides the various involved parties the capability and capacity to strengthen their commitment to national environmental and waste management goals and objectives; and Furthering research of public education in the environmental arena and research of needed national education resources in scientific and technical areas related to environmental restoration and waste management.

Eyman, L.D.

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

Abstract This paper reviews specific issues and challenges in reactive power management within the competitive electricity  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, points out various deficiencies in the reactive power procurement in the US markets and provides recommendations for, and lists a number of challenges in the reactive power supply and usage area. Basically of the same type as active power or active energy. Many reactive power management issues concern the static

Gross, George

212

Proposal for a Guide for Quality Management Systems for PV Manufacturing: Supplemental Requirements to ISO 9001-2008 (Revised)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This technical specification provides a guideline for photovoltaic module manufacturers to produce modules that, once the design has proven to meet the quality and reliability requirements, replicate such design in an industrial scale without compromising its consistency with the requirements.

Norum, P.; Sinicco, I.; Eguchi, Y.; Lokanath, S.; Zhou, W.; Brueggemann, G.; Mikonowicz, A.; Yamamichi, M.; Kurtz, S.

2013-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

Impact on energy requirements and emissions of heat pumps and micro-cogenerators participating in demand side management  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract The potential impacts of participating in demand side management (DSM) on the performance of air source heat pumps (ASHP) and micro-combined heat and power (mCHP) units are considered by this study. As significant consumers and generators of electricity at the distribution level, large numbers of heat pumps and micro-cogenerators would provide considerable scope for participation in DSM systems. However, it is possible that operating regimes which are optimised for grid considerations will not achieve the maximum performance that is possible from the units. Modelling has been conducted to investigate the significance of this effect, considering the case where local distribution constraints are the main driver for demand side interventions. A model of domestic electrical demand has been adapted to consider a neighbourhood of 128 dwellings in order to identify when interventions are necessary. This has been combined with dynamic models of two combustion engine micro-cogenerators, a solid oxide fuel cell micro-cogenerator and two ASHPs. A simple thermal model of each building is combined with a range of user preferences in order to determine the preferred operating profiles of the heating units. The DSM scheme analysed here is likely to have minimal impact on the emissions and energy requirements associated with each heating unit. Its effect is similar to that which occurs without DSM if the control system gain is relaxed such that equivalent thermal comfort is achieved. DSM can reduce the peak electrical demand of the neighbourhood. However, in the scenarios investigated, it is unlikely that the peaks can be reduced sufficiently such that they do not exceed the capacity of the local distribution transformer if \\{ASHPs\\} are used in all dwellings. By using a combination of mCHP units with ASHPs, it is possible to supply heating to all dwellings without exceeding this capacity. In this case, the use of DSM can increase the ratio of \\{ASHPs\\} used. In the context of a low carbon grid electricity supply, this will reduce the average carbon emissions associated with the neighbourhood.

Samuel J.G. Cooper; Geoffrey P. Hammond; Marcelle C. McManus; John G. Rogers

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

214

Secretarial Review Draft Environmental Assessment/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review Draft Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory review draft Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Flexibility Analysis For the Arctic Fishery Management Plan And Amendment 29 to the Fishery Management Plan

215

Application of the office of civilian radioactive waste management QA requirements to the hanford spent nuclear fuel project  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document identifies, at a high-level, the Hanford SNF Project systems, structures, and components and activities that must implement to some degree the OCRWM QARD requirements to ensure compliance with RL direction. This document will also be used to support development of a QARD requirements matrix for the implementation of QARD requirements.

MCCORMACK, R.L.

1999-05-12T23:59:59.000Z

216

management  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

5%2A en Management and Budget http:nnsa.energy.govaboutusouroperationsmanagementandbudget

P...

217

2012 CERTS LAAR Program Peer Review - Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads - Anna Scaglioni, UC Davis  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Integration and Extension of Direct Integration and Extension of Direct Load Management of Smart Loads Anna Scaglione, UC Davis GRA: Mahnoosh Alizadeh Project objective  Invent methods to "store" load demand for * Real-time "generation following" * Integration of load reserves as dispatchable assets in the Energy Market  Architecture for virtual "reserves" (queues) of electrical load demand * Watts to Job mapping (analysis)  Captures digitally the service requirements - Equal service type = Equal queue * Job to Watts mapping (synthesis)  Allows to optimally schedule the load profile Major technical accomplishments  Centralized model: Digital Direct Load Scheduling (DDLS) - Year 1-Year 2

218

Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from waste management processes for municipalities - A comparative review focusing on Africa  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted due to waste management in the cities of developing countries is predicted to rise considerably in the near future; however, these countries have a series of problems in accounting and reporting these gases. Some of these problems are related to the status quo of waste management in the developing world and some to the lack of a coherent framework for accounting and reporting of greenhouse gases from waste at municipal level. This review summarizes and compares GHG emissions from individual waste management processes which make up a municipal waste management system, with an emphasis on developing countries and, in particular, Africa. It should be seen as a first step towards developing a more holistic GHG accounting model for municipalities. The comparison between these emissions from developed and developing countries at process level, reveals that there is agreement on the magnitude of the emissions expected from each process (generation of waste, collection and transport, disposal and recycling). The highest GHG savings are achieved through recycling, and these savings would be even higher in developing countries which rely on coal for energy production (e.g. South Africa, India and China) and where non-motorized collection and transport is used. The highest emissions are due to the methane released by dumpsites and landfills, and these emissions are predicted to increase significantly, unless more of the methane is captured and either flared or used for energy generation. The clean development mechanism (CDM) projects implemented in the developing world have made some progress in this field; however, African countries lag behind.

Friedrich, Elena, E-mail: Friedriche@ukzn.ac.za [CRECHE Centre for Research in Environmental, Coastal and Hydrological Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Surveying and Construction, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, Durban (South Africa); Trois, Cristina [CRECHE Centre for Research in Environmental, Coastal and Hydrological Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Surveying and Construction, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, Durban (South Africa)

2011-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

219

Laws and Requirements | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Laws and Requirements Laws and Requirements To help agencies comply with federal laws and requirements, the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) analyzes energy management...

220

Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for the Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents, July 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

<: <: iisS Offlct of Hulth , S.ftly ind St curity OFFICE OF SAFETY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT EVALUATIONS PROTOCOL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF CRITERIA AND REVIEW APPROACH DOCUMENTS July 2013 Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Protocol for the Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents July 2013 Reviewed by: 1 .. ~~·\? Approved by: William E. Mi.lier Date Deputy Director Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight /\ Thomas R. Stak~r Deputy Director for Oversight Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Focused Review of Environment, Safety and Health and Emergency Management at the Kansas City Plant - Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environment, Safety and Health Environment, Safety and Health and Emergency Management at the Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance ISM Summary Report OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ..............................................................................1 2.0 Status and Results ....................................................................3 3.0 Conclusions ..............................................................................8 4.0 Ratings .................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION .................13 APPENDIX B - SITE-SPECIFIC FINDINGS .............................15 Abbreviations Used in This Report AL Albuquerque Operations Office DOE U.S. Department of Energy

222

Integrated safety management system verification: Volume 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Department of Energy (DOE) Policy (P) 450.4, Safety Management System Policy, commits to institutionalization of an Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) throughout the DOE complex. The DOE Acquisition Regulations (DEAR, 48 CFR 970) requires contractors to manage and perform work in accordance with a documented Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS). Guidance and expectations have been provided to PNNL by incorporation into the operating contract (Contract DE-ACM-76FL0 1830) and by letter. The contract requires that the contractor submit a description of their ISMS for approval by DOE. PNNL submitted their proposed Safety Management System Description for approval on November 25,1997. RL tentatively approved acceptance of the description pursuant to a favorable recommendation from this review. The Integrated Safety Management System Verification is a review of the adequacy of the ISMS description in fulfilling the requirements of the DEAR and the DOE Policy. The purpose of this review is to provide the Richland Operations Office Manager with a recommendation for approval of the ISMS description of the Pacific Northwest Laboratory based upon compliance with the requirements of 49 CFR 970.5204(-2 and -78); and to verify the extent and maturity of ISMS implementation within the Laboratory. Further the review will provide a model for other DOE laboratories managed by the Office of Assistant Secretary for Energy Research.

Christensen, R.F.

1998-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

223

Final Independent External Peer Review Report Princeville, North Carolina Flood Risk Management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in Minority Populations and Low-income Populations," Federal agencies are also required to consider potential disproportional adverse effects or denial of potential benefits of Federal policies and programs to communities Feasibility Study Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment Prepared by Battelle Memorial

US Army Corps of Engineers

224

Resouce recovery option in solid-waste management: a review guide for public officials  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purposes of this document are to: serve as a guide for public-works directors and others interested in implementing resource-recovery systems; and (2) provide background material that can be used in presenting information on resource-recovery systems to city managers, mayors, legislative bodies, and citizen advisory groups. It raises some issues of which local communities must be aware before developing resource-recovery systems. Additionally, the document: (1) focuses on possible institutional problems that may arise in planning waste-to-energy systems and presents some solutions and alternatives, and (2) serve public-works officials as a reference for other publications on resource-recovery systems. It will aid public-works officials in the decision-making process concerning the implementation of waste-to-energy systems. Members of the public works profession who are fully aware of all the implementation procedures involved with resource-recovery systems can best decide if this is a feasible solid-waste-management option for their community.

Nemeth, D M

1981-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

225

Lessons Learned: A review of utility experience with conservation and load management programs for commercial and industrial customers  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report examines utility experience with conservation and load management (C LM) programs of commercial and industrial (C I) customers in order to summarize the lessons learned from program experiences to date and what these teach us about how to operate successful programs in the future. This analysis was motivated by a desire to learn about programs which achieve high participation rates and high electricity savings while remaining cost effective. Also, we wanted to review the very latest experiences with innovative program approaches -- approaches that might prove useful to utilities as they scale up their C LM activities. Specific objectives of this phase of the study are threefold: (1) To disseminate information on utility C LM experience to a nationwide audience. (2) To review current New York State utility programs and make suggestions on how these programs can be improved. (3) To collect data for the final phase of the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy/New York State Energy Research and Development Authority project, which will examine the savings that are achievable if C LM programs are pushed to the limit'' of current knowledge on how to structure and run cost-effective C LM programs. 19 tabs.

Nadel, S.

1990-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

226

Summary of the planning, management, and evaluation process for the Geothermal Program Review VI conference  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to present an overview of the planning, facilitation, and evaluation process used to conduct the Geothermal Program Review VI (PR VI) conference. This document was also prepared to highlight lessons learned from PR VI and, by utilizing the evaluation summaries and recommendations, be used as a planning tool for PR VII. The conference, entitled Beyond Goals and Objectives,'' was sponsored by the US Department of Energy's (DOE) Geothermal Technology Division (GTD), PR VI was held in San Francisco, California on April 19--21, 1988 and was attended by 127 participants. PR VI was held in conjunction with the National Geothermal Association's (NGA) Industry Round Table. This document presents a brief summary of the activities, responsibilities, and resources for implementing the PR VI meeting and provides recommendations, checklists, and a proposed schedule for assisting in planning PR VII.

Not Available

1988-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

227

Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review Peer Review Summary In response to the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" (the Bulletin), the Department of...

228

the DOE ISMS Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

* Corrective action management * Environmental management * Commercial grade dedication * Conduct of operations "This ISMS review by DOE goes beyond ensuring that we have a...

229

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW /  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Regulatory Impact Review For a proposed Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska to Remove

230

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review for Proposed Amendment 102 to the Fishery....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Regulatory Impact Review Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Establishing a Community Quota Entity

231

Environmental Management System Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

R-3 • Environmental Management System Plan References 30.of Energy, Safety Management System Policy, DOE P 450.4 (E), Environmental Management Systems ? Requirements with

Fox, Robert

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

232

1994 Department of Energy Records Management Conference  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) Records Management Group (RMG) provides a forum for DOE and its contractor personnel to review and discuss subjects, issues, and concerns of common interest. This forum will include the exchange of information, and interpretation of requirements, and a dialog to aid in cost-effective management of the DOE Records Management program. This report contains the contributions from this forum.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

2013 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada; Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site (National Security Technologies, LLC 2007a) requires an annual review to assess the adequacy of the performance assessments (PAs) and composite analyses (CAs), with the results submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management. The Disposal Authorization Statements for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) also require that such reviews be made and that secondary or minor unresolved issues be tracked and addressed as part of the maintenance plan (DOE 1999a, 2000). The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office performed an annual review of the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS PAs and CAs for fiscal year (FY) 2013. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2013 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R&D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R&D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs. Important developments in FY 2013 include the following: • Development of a new Area 5 RWMS closure inventory estimate based on disposals through FY 2013 • Evaluation of new or revised waste streams by special analysis • Development of version 4.115 of the Area 5 RWMS GoldSim PA/CA model The Area 3 RWMS has been in inactive status since July 1, 2006, with the last shipment received in April 2006. The FY 2013 review of operations, facility design, closure plans, monitoring results, and R&D results for the Area 3 RWMS indicates no changes that would impact PA validity. The conclusion of the annual review is that all performance objectives can be met and the Area 3 RWMS PA remains valid. There is no need to the revise the Area 3 RWMS PA. Review of Area 5 RWMS operations, design, closure plans, monitoring results, and R&D activities indicates that no significant changes have occurred. The FY 2013 PA results, generated with the Area 5 RWMS v4.115 GoldSim PA model, indicate that there continues to be a reasonable expectation of meeting all performance objectives. The results and conclusions of the Area 5 RWMS PA are judged valid, and there is no need to the revise the PA. A review of changes potentially impacting the CAs indicates that no significant changes occurred in FY 2013. The continuing adequacy of the CAs was evaluated with the new models, and no significant changes that would alter the CAs results or conclusions were found. The revision of the Area 3 RWMS CA, which will include the Yucca Flat Underground Test Area (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] 97) source term, is scheduled for FY 2024, following the completion of the Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan in FY 2015. Inclusion of the Frenchman Flat Underground Test Area (CAU 98) results in the Area 5 RWMS CA is scheduled for FY 2016, pending the completion of the CAU 98 Closure Report in FY 2015. Near-term R&D efforts will focus on continuing development of the PA, CA, and inventory models for the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS.

Shott, Gregory [NSTec] [NSTec

2014-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

The Bachelor of Management degree in Management Information Systems is a minimum of 40 courses in length. Admission to the Faculty may occur at the end of Year One. Students are required to have the following courses for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Bachelor of Management degree in Management Information Systems is a minimum of 40 courses ManagementInformationSystems Name: __________________________________________________________ ID 4840 - Systems Analysis Management 4841 - Systems Design One of: Management 3380 - Technological Change

Seldin, Jonathan P.

235

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site- September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Savannah River Site Environmental Management Nuclear Facilities

236

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review Planning  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Planning Planning Woman participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) begins the peer review planning process by analyzing the purpose of the funds to be distributed. Because each agency's needs are different, ORISE then designs and manages a flexible, scientific peer review process that can be modified based on a sponsor's regulatory, policy and operational requirements. ORISE's existing tools and systems, and knowledge of reviewing proposals from a government agency perspective, are helping to promote the quality and credibility of scientific information and funded research. ORISE's peer review planning process ensures each objective review is completed on schedule, within budget and with a high degree of process integrity.

237

Memo Issuance of EM Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MAR 2 4 201011 MAR 2 4 201011 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION FROM: DR. STEVEN L. KRAHN DEPUTY ASSISTANT SAFETY AND SECU EIVVIROIVMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Issuance of Environmental Management Capital and Major Operating Project Standard Review Plan Edition Two The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission critical projects/facilities. Effective management of these projects requires multiple disciplines to be integrated and engaged at various project lifecycle phases. These disciplines include project management, engineering, design, safety, environment, safeguards and security, and quality assurance. The lessons-learned to date from ongoing Headquarters (HQ) and Field project reviews [e.g., Construction Project

238

Conference Management  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish requirements and responsibilities with respect to managing conferences sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE) or by DOE management and operating contractors and other contractors who perform work at DOE-owned or -leased facilities, including management and integration contractors and environmental restoration management contractors (when using funds that will be reimbursed by DOE). Cancels DOE N 110.3.

1999-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

239

Microsoft Word - Flash_09-04_Submission_requirements.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4 1 4 1 June 26, 2009 DATE: June 12, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR ALL PROGRAM ELEMENTS FROM: PMCDP CERTIFICATION REVIEW BOARD SUBJECT: Project Management Career Development Program Certification Process Requirement Change One June 12, 2009, the Certification Review Board (CRB) identified new requirements regarding timely submission of certification packages for CRB approval. Effective immediately, in order for Level 1 and 2 packages to be eligible for certification action at the next scheduled Board meeting, packages must successfully pass the independent review and OCEM approval phases no later than two weeks prior to that upcoming Board meeting. It is strongly recommended Level 1 and 2 packages ready for CRB consideration be submitted to

240

Review of the Independent Integrated Safety Management/Integrated Work Management Assessment of Research and Develoopment and Programmatic Work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, December 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Integrated Safety Independent Integrated Safety Management/Integrated Work Management Assessment of Research and Development and Programmatic Work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory December 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Federal Energy Management Program: Computerized Maintenance Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Computerized Computerized Maintenance Management Systems to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Computerized Maintenance Management Systems on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Computerized Maintenance Management Systems on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Computerized Maintenance Management Systems on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Computerized Maintenance Management Systems on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Computerized Maintenance Management Systems on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Computerized Maintenance Management Systems on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Federal Requirements Program Management

242

Transuranic Waste Requirements  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The guide provides criteria for determining if a waste is to be managed in accordance with DOE M 435.1-1, Chapter III, Transuranic Waste Requirements.

1999-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

243

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Laboratory - Laboratory - April 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - April 2012 April 2012 Review of the Consequence Assessment Program at the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, conducted an independent review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) emergency management consequence assessment program. The purpose of the review was to measure LANL's compliance against U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) orders and LANL institutional requirements. The review scope was coordinated with the Los Alamos Site Office (LASO), and the review was conducted February 7-9, 2012. LANL's consequence assessment process ensures that estimates of onsite

244

Science Requirements Process  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Presentations Galleries ESnet Awards and Honors ESnet Live Blog Home Science Engagement Science Requirements Reviews Science Engagement Move your data Programs...

245

Standard Review Plan - Overview | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Standard Review Plan - Overview Standard Review Plan - Overview The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and...

246

MONITORED GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document establishes the Monitored Geologic Repository system requirements for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS). These requirements are based on the ''Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Requirements Document'' (CRD) (DOE 2004a). The ''Monitored Geologic Repository Systems Requirements Document'' (MGR-RD) is developed in accordance with LP-3.3 SQ-OCRWM, ''Preparation, Review, and Approval of Office of Repository Development Requirements Document''. As illustrated in Figure 1, the MGR-RD forms part of the DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Technical Requirements Baseline. Revision 0 of this document identifies requirements for the current phase of repository design that is focused on developing a preliminary design for the repository and will be included in the license application submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a repository at Yucca Mountain in support of receiving a construction authorization and subsequent operating license. As additional information becomes available, more detailed requirements will be identified in subsequent revisions to this document.

V. Trebules

2006-06-02T23:59:59.000Z

247

Physics Department Management Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Magnetic Fields · Non-ionizing Radiation EPA RCRA Inspection ­ 2/10 No findings BHSO Electrical Safety of the BNL Fire Safety Program ­ 5/10 · Materials in corridors impede egress BHSO Surveillance Software provide Risk Assessment for each hazard Information distribution · Web pages - http://www.phy.bnl.gov/~safety

Homes, Christopher C.

248

NERSC HEP Requirements Review Agenda  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Study: Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations Doug Toussaint, Steven Gottlieb, Richard Brower Energy and Intensity Frontiers: Theory 11:10 Case Study: Theoretical Particle Physics...

249

Reviewer Instructions:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reviewer Instructions: Reviewer Instructions: 1. All review comments to be provided electronically using this review form. 2. Focus the review on substantive issues within your disciplinary, regulatory, or policy area. 3. Look only at the portions relevant to your agency and the land under your management. The individual land management agencies will be amending land use plans or issuing a Record of Decision, so please don't alter the other agencies' roles and responsibilities. 4. Target the review on the adequacy and reasonableness of text and analyses within your disciplinary, regulatory, or policy area. Please be aware that this is a programmatic EIS. 5. All comments should be as specific as possible. Comments such as "text unclear" or "expand" do not provide sufficient

250

Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14 14 Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan Commercial Grade Dedication (CGD) August 2013 2 of 14 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Standard Review Plan (SRP) Commercial Grade Dedication (CGD) Applicability CD-0 CD-1 CD-2 CD-3 CD-4 Operation Post Operation August 2013 3 of 14 Table of Contents Objective ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Overview of Commercial Grade Dedication for Nuclear Facilities .............................................................. 4 Requirements ................................................................................................................................................ 5

251

Impact of DOE Orders on Waste Management Operation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Department of Energy Orders are the internal documents which govern the management of all Department of Energy facilities and operations. DOE Orders are the vehicles by which Federal and state laws and regulations are applied to Department of Energy activities. A selected set of 22 Department of Energy Orders was reviewed to identify the applicability and impact of each Order on waste management operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Of the 22 Orders reviewed, five set forth requirements which have a high degree of impact on waste management activities. Eight Orders have a moderate degree of impact on waste management activities, and the remaining nine Orders have a low degree of impact.

Klein, R.B.; Jennrich, E.A.; Shuman, R.; Sandquist, G.M. (Rogers and Associates Engineering Corp., Salt Lake City, UT (United States)); Rutz, A.C.; Littleton, M.W.; McCauce, C.H. (Wastren, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States))

1989-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

Microsoft Word - APRIL 2009 PMCDP Module CHRIS ESS Tutorial_PSO_CERTIFICATION_REVIEW_REQUEST.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

PSO CERTIFICATION REVIEW REQUEST PSO CERTIFICATION REVIEW REQUEST REV: APRIL 2009 1 1. Click on the "PMCDP" menu item. Select "PSO Certification/Review Request Form." 2. You will be presented with a screen titled "PMCDP PSO CERTIFICATION/REVIEW REQUESTS FOR [Your Name]." Click on "Submit a new request. PSO Certification Review Request Once the site/office manager approval has been obtained, the PSO should be notified that you are ready to be presented to the PMCDP Certification Review Board for certification consideration. Most PSOs require notification. If your PSO does not require such notification, you must still follow the steps below and select "No program official (PSO) notification/review required." ESS Tutorial, Project Management Career Development Program

253

Vehicle Technologies Office Merit Review 2014: Integrated Vehicle Thermal Management – Combining Fluid Loops in Electric Drive Vehicles  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation given by National Renewable Energy Laboratory at 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting about...

254

Review Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - March 2012 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Nuclear Facility Configuration Management Program February 29, 2012 Independent Oversight Targeted Review, Y-12 National Security Complex - February 2012 Targeted Review of Site Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Y-12 National Security Complex February 29, 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant - February 2012 Review of the Pantex Plant Implementation Verification Review Processes February 28, 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 Review of the Implementation Verification Review Processes at the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management for Building 3019

255

Program Assessment, Program Review, Program Prioritization What's the Difference? Each academic department is required to have an Assessment Plan and submit periodic assessment updates. Additionally, each department is  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in a program review. A department's failure to have or follow through with their assessment plan strategic plan is part of the review. The department's alignment with institutional prioritiesProgram Assessment, Program Review, Program Prioritization ­ What's the Difference? Each academic

Maxwell, Bruce D.

256

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - December 2012 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 2012 December 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Tank Farms - December 2012 December 2012 Review of the Hanford Tank Farms Radiological Controls Activity-Level Implementation This report documents an independent review by the Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight) within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) of radiological protection program (RPP) activity-level implementation at the Hanford Tank Farms. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations. The purpose of this Independent Oversight targeted review effort is to evaluate the flowdown of occupational radiation protection requirements, as expressed in facility RPPs, to work planning, control, and execution processes, such as

257

A regulatory approach for e-waste management: a cross-national review of current practice and policy with an assessment and policy recommendation for the Indian perspective  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This paper attempts to make an assessment and policy recommendation for the Indian perspective through a cross-national review of current practice and policy. It also addresses in a transition economy with some reference to policies and practices in other transition economies. It has been shown that existing Hazardous Waste Rules could overturn the necessity of a separate national legislation dealing with e-waste alone after it is being configured to accommodate e-waste for its management in India. The regulatory approach proposed could serve as a model or at least a starting point for other transition countries that may not be so far along as India with respect to management of e-waste.

Amitava Bandyopadhyay

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

258

Draft of the PHENIX Management Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The PHENIX Management Plan provides the baselines and controls that the PHENIX and RHIC Projects will follow to meet the technical, cost, and schedule goals for the PHENIX detector at RHIC. This plan will be reviewed and updated as required, with revisions made by agreement among the signed participants.

Not Available

1994-03-10T23:59:59.000Z

259

Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Management » Compliance » Low-Level Waste Program Management » Compliance » Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) The Office of Environmental Management (EM) Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) was established to fulfill the requirements contained in Section I.2.E(1)(a) of the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, and exercised by the senior managers of EM. The LFRG assists EM senior managers in the review of documentation that supports the approval of performance assessments and composite analyses or appropriate Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)documents as described in Section II of the LFRG Charter. Through its efforts, the LFRG supports the issuance

260

Management of Nuclear Materials  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish requirements for the lifecycle management of DOE owned and/or managed accountable nuclear materials. Cancels DOE O 5660.1B.

2009-08-17T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Protocol, Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents - July 2013 Protocol, Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents - July 2013 July 2013 Protocol for the Development and Maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents The purpose of this protocol is to establish the requirements and responsibilities for the development and maintenance of Criteria and Review Approach Documents (CRADs) used by the Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45). The HS-45 CRADS are carefully selected, modified (if required), and referenced in HS-45 appraisal plans. These plans are used to provide an outline of the activities planned to assess the effectiveness of safety and emergency management processes and

262

The Water Resources Management (WRM) program is an interdisciplinary course of study leading to an M.S. degree in environmental studies. Degree requirements include a group  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Preface The Water Resources Management (WRM) program is an interdisciplinary course of study Leaf (Chapters 1, 2 and 5) Geology, Water Resources Management andrew.t.leaf@gmail.com Amanda Perdzock and Regional Planning michelle.3.scott@gmail.com Benjamin Tansey (Chapter 7) Water Resources Management tansy

Sheridan, Jennifer

263

There is an increasing order in digitized technology. This increasing order requires high qualitative document management system which can be used in secure fashion especially for organization with  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

qualitative document management system which can be used in secure fashion especially for organization. The proposed framework provides the necessary options for creating an effective document management system document management system, the end product will be suitable for organization and guaranteed to satisfy

264

Watershed Management Program Record of Decision; 28Aug1997  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Watershed Management Program Watershed Management Program Record of Decision SUMMARY Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to adopt a set of prescriptions (goals, strategies, and procedural requirements) that apply to future BPA-funded watershed management projects. Various sources-including Indian tribes, state agencies, property owners, private conservation groups, or other Federal agencies-propose watershed management projects to the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council) for BPA funding. Following independent scientific and public reviews, the Council then selects projects to recommend for BPA funding. BPA adopts this set of prescriptions to standardize the planning and implementation of individual watershed management programs and projects. This decision is based on consideration of

265

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 Independent Oversight Special Review, Headquarters - August 2008 August 2008 Review of Construction Safety and Health Programs This special review of construction safety was performed by the Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), to provide feedback to DOE line management and contractors on the effectiveness of line organizations at DOE sites in implementing construction safety requirements. This special review is based on data collected over the past three years (covering the timeframe from late 2005 to early 2008) during scheduled inspections performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations, at the

266

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Guidance on Diversity and Inclusion |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Guidance on Diversity and Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Guidance on Diversity and Inclusion Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Guidance on Diversity and Inclusion The following documents are from the Office of Personnel Management (OMP)'s Office of Diversity and Inclusion, which is responsible for reviewing and evaluating plans, reports, and programs for conformance with various laws, regulations, and directives relating to diversity and inclusion. Governement-Wide Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan and Guidance: Executive Order 13583, issued on August 18, 2011, requires OPM to publish a Government-Wide Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan, and guidance to agencies. Program Reviews: The Office of Personnel Management (OMP)'s Office of Diversity and Inclusion prepares program reviews and annual accomplishment

267

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Guidance on Diversity and Inclusion |  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Guidance on Diversity and Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Guidance on Diversity and Inclusion Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Guidance on Diversity and Inclusion The following documents are from the Office of Personnel Management (OMP)'s Office of Diversity and Inclusion, which is responsible for reviewing and evaluating plans, reports, and programs for conformance with various laws, regulations, and directives relating to diversity and inclusion. Governement-Wide Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan and Guidance: Executive Order 13583, issued on August 18, 2011, requires OPM to publish a Government-Wide Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan, and guidance to agencies. Program Reviews: The Office of Personnel Management (OMP)'s Office of Diversity and Inclusion prepares program reviews and annual accomplishment

268

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review/Environmental Assessment/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review/Environmental Assessment/ Initial Regulatory............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW Flexibility Analysis for Proposed Amendment 92 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea

269

Review: Wicked Environmental Problems  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Bauer, ed. Forging Environmentalism (2006). Regardless ofby reading Wicked Environmental Problems as they participateReview: Wicked Environmental Problems: Managing Uncertainty

Jenkins, David

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

SEB Secretariat and Knowledge Manager  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SEB Secretariat and Knowledge Manager SEB Secretariat and Knowledge Manager (SKM) Update Position was established last summer Among the duties and responsibilities are:  Developing and maintaining source selection templates and forms  Establishing, maintaining and disseminating Departmental SSO and SEB policy, procedures and guidance  Establishing SEB reporting requirements and tracking status of SEB activities against established milestones 1 Documents and Templates Prepared or Revised To Date * Issued - Acquisition Guide Chapter 1.4 - SEB Monthly Status Report template * Under Review - Competitive Range Determination template - Source Selection Decision Document template - Source Selection Plan template - Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.1 Revision - Acquisition Guide Chapter 15.1 Revision

271

RM Environmental Review (NEPA)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Environmental Review-NEPA Environmental Review-NEPA Categorical exclusions are posted here to promote transparency and openness. Some actions may have environmental impacts that require an environmental assessment and a detailed analysis to determine the extent and severity of the impacts. For actions that have significant impacts or consequences to the environment or human health, RM prepares environmental impact statements. Environmental Impact Statements-EIS Estes-Flatiron Transmission Line Rebuild Project Granby Pumping Plant-Windy Gap Transmission Line Rebuild Project Hermosa West Wind Energy Project Maintenance and Vegetation Management along Existing Western TransmissionLine Rights of Way on National Forest System Lands in Colorado, Utah, Nebraska Platte River Cooperative Agreement PEIS, NE, CO and WY, DOE/EIS-0295 (Cooperating Agency)

272

2012 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada: Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site (National Security Technologies, LLC 2007a) requires an annual review to assess the adequacy of the performance assessments (PAs) and composite analyses (CAs), with the results submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management. The Disposal Authorization Statements for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) also require that such reviews be made and that secondary or minor unresolved issues be tracked and addressed as part of the maintenance plan (DOE 1999a, 2000). The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office performed an annual review of the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS PAs and CAs for fiscal year (FY) 2012. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2012 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R&D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R&D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs. Important developments in FY 2012 include the following: ? Release of a special analysis for the Area 3 RWMS assessing the continuing validity of the PA and CA ? Development of a new Area 5 RWMS closure inventory estimate based on disposals through FY 2012 ? Evaluation of new or revised waste streams by special analysis ? Development of version 4.114 of the Area 5 RWMS GoldSim PA model The Area 3 RWMS has been in inactive status since July 1, 2006, with the last shipment received in April 2006. The FY 2012 review of operations, facility design, closure plans, monitoring results, and R&D results for the Area 3 RWMS indicates no changes that would impact PA validity. A special analysis using the Area 3 RWMS v2.102 GoldSim PA model was prepared to update the PA results for the Area 3 RWMS in FY 2012. The special analysis concludes that all performance objectives can be met and the Area 3 RWMS PA remains valid. There is no need to the revise the Area 3 RWMS PA. Review of Area 5 RWMS operations, design, closure plans, monitoring results, and R&D activities indicates no significant changes other than an increase in the inventory disposed. The FY 2012 PA results, generated with the Area 5 RWMS v4.114 GoldSim PA model, indicate that there continues to be a reasonable expectation of meeting all performance objectives. The results and conclusions of the Area 5 RWMS PA are judged valid, and there is no need to the revise the PA. A review of changes potentially impacting the CAs indicates that no significant changes occurred in FY 2012. The continuing adequacy of the CAs was evaluated with the new models, and no significant changes that would alter CA results or conclusions were found. The revision of the Area 3 RWMS CA, which will include the Underground Test Area source term (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] 97), is scheduled for FY 2024, following the completion of the Yucca Flat CAU 97 Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan in FY 2016. Inclusion of the Frenchman Flat CAU 98 results in the Area 5 RWMS CA is scheduled for FY 2016, pending the completion of the CAU 98 closure report in FY 2015. Near-term R&D efforts will focus on continuing development of the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS GoldSim PA/CA and inventory models.

Shott, G. [National Security Technologies, LLC

2013-03-18T23:59:59.000Z

273

Secretarial Review Draft REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review Draft REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW and FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For a proposed Regulatory Amendment to Implement Amendment 78 to the Fishery Management Plan for Gulf of Alaska Groundfish June 2009 #12;Post-delivery Transfers ­ Secretarial review draft June 2009 Central Gulf of Alaska

274

Federal Energy Management Program: Operations and Maintenance Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Management Support to someone by E-mail Management Support to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Operations and Maintenance Management Support on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Operations and Maintenance Management Support on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Operations and Maintenance Management Support on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Operations and Maintenance Management Support on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Operations and Maintenance Management Support on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Operations and Maintenance Management Support on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Federal Requirements Program Management

275

Chapter_7_Surveys_and_Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 Surveys and Reviews This chapter describes the programs and procedures adopted by DOE HQ to implement the requirements of DOE Order 470.4B, Safeguards and Security Program, Appendix A, Section 2, Survey, Review, and Self-Assessment Programs. The Survey and Review Programs provide assurance to the Secretary of Energy, Departmental elements, and OGAs that safeguards and security (S&S) interests and activities are protected at the required levels. These programs also provide a basis for line management to make decisions regarding S&S program activities, including allocation of resources, acceptance of risk, and mitigation of vulnerabilities. The results of these reviews provide a compliance and performance-based documented evaluation of the S&S program.

276

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

of Environmental Management - February 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management - February 2012 February 2012 Review of the Implementation...

277

OVTP Merit Review EPAct State & Alternative Fuel Provider Data...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

OVTP Merit Review EPAct State & Alternative Fuel Provider Data Collection and Management OVTP Merit Review EPAct State & Alternative Fuel Provider Data Collection and Management...

278

Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant- April 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Integrated Safety Management System Phase I Verification Review at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant

279

Risk Management RM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Risk Management Review Module Risk Management Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R Risk M Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan Managem view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE (SRP) ment e pplicability D-3 EMENT CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-1189-2008, Integration of Safety into the Design Process, and EM's internal

280

RPAM & Energy Order Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

430.1C, Real Property Asset Management 430.1C, Real Property Asset Management and DOE O 430.2B, Departmental Energy, Renewable Energy and Transportation Management Requirements, Overlap & Differences Office of Engineering and Construction Management September 2009 2 10/27/2009 Energy Order & RPAM Order Requirements DOE O 430.1C - RPAM DOE O 430.2B ENERGY ORDER Energy Efficiency Water Consumption Utility Metering ESPCs & USPCs Personnel - Energy Training Environmental Management System (EMS) Real Property Performance Indicators Sustainable Buildings Facilities Information Management System (FIMS) Personnel - Certified Realty Specialists Ten Year Site Plans Sustainable & Integrated Design TEAM Executable Plans High Performance Building Plan OVERLAP Real Property

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Vice President, Northwest Requirements Marketing  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Northwest Requirements Marketing organization develops power rates, products, services, and contracts, administers long-term power contracts and other related contracts, manages third-party...

282

Impact of DOE Orders on Waste Management Operation. Volume 1: [Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Department of Energy Orders are the internal documents which govern the management of all Department of Energy facilities and operations. DOE Orders are the vehicles by which Federal and state laws and regulations are applied to Department of Energy activities. A selected set of 22 Department of Energy Orders was reviewed to identify the applicability and impact of each Order on waste management operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Of the 22 Orders reviewed, five set forth requirements which have a high degree of impact on waste management activities. Eight Orders have a moderate degree of impact on waste management activities, and the remaining nine Orders have a low degree of impact.

Klein, R.B.; Jennrich, E.A.; Shuman, R.; Sandquist, G.M. [Rogers and Associates Engineering Corp., Salt Lake City, UT (United States); Rutz, A.C.; Littleton, M.W.; McCauce, C.H. [Wastren, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1989-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

2011 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada: Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site (National Security Technologies, LLC, 2007a) requires an annual review to assess the adequacy of the Performance Assessments (PAs) and Composite Analyses (CAs), with the results submitted annually to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management. The Disposal Authorization Statements for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) also require that such reviews be made and that secondary or minor unresolved issues be tracked and addressed as part of the maintenance plan (DOE, 1999a; 2000). The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office performed an annual review of the Area 3 and Area 5 RWMS PAs and CAs for fiscal year (FY) 2011. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2011 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R and D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) (formerly the Nevada Test Site) relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R and D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs. Important developments in FY 2011 include the following: (1) Operation of a new shallow land disposal unit and a new Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-compliant lined disposal unit at the Area 5 RWMS; (2) Development of new closure inventory estimates based on disposals through FY 2011; (3) Evaluation of new or revised waste streams by special analysis; (4) Development of version 2.102 of the Area 3 RWMS GoldSim PA model; and (5) Development of version 4.113 of the Area 5 RWMS GoldSim PA model. Analysis of the latest available data using the Area 5 RWMS v4.113 GoldSim PA model indicates that all performance objectives can be met. The results and conclusions of the Area 5 RWMS PA are judged valid, and there is no need to the revise the PA. The Area 3 RWMS has been in inactive status since July 1, 2006, with the last shipment received in April 2006. In FY 2011, there were no operational changes, monitoring results, or R and D results for the Area 3 RWMS that would impact PA validity. Despite the increase in waste volume and inventory at the Area 3 RWMS since 1996 when the PA was approved, the facility performance evaluated with the Area 3 RWMS PA GoldSim model, version 2.0 (with the final closure inventory), remains well below the performance objectives set forth in U.S. Department of Energy Order DOE O 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management' (DOE, 2001). The conclusions of the Area 3 RWMS PA remain valid. A special analysis was prepared to update the PA and CA results for the Area 3 RWMS in FY 2011. Release of the special analysis is planned for FY 2012. The continuing adequacy of the CAs was evaluated with the new models, and no significant changes that would alter CA results or conclusions were found. Inclusion of the Frenchman Flat Underground Test Area (UGTA) results in the Area 5 RWMS CA is scheduled for FY 2016, pending the completion of the closure report for the Frenchman Flat UGTA corrective action unit (CAU) in FY 2015. An industrial site, CAU 547, with corrective action sites near the Area 3 RWMS was found to have a significant plutonium inventory in 2009. CAU 547 will be evaluated for inclusion of future revisions or updates of the Area 3 RWMS CA. The revision of the Area 3 RWMS CA, which will include the UGTA source terms, is expected in FY 2024, following the completion of the Yucca Flat CAU Corrective Action Decision Document, scheduled for FY 2023. Near-term R and D efforts will focus on continuing development of the Are

NSTec Environmental Management

2012-03-20T23:59:59.000Z

284

Better Buildings Workforce Guidelines for Facility Energy Manager...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Guidelines for Facility Energy Manager - 2014 BTO Peer Review Better Buildings Workforce Guidelines for Facility Energy Manager - 2014 BTO Peer Review Presenter: Phil Coleman,...

285

Readiness Review | The Ames Laboratory  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

is documented on a Readiness Review Activity Approval Form. Once the agreed upon conditions and requirements are met the review is finalized through Operational Approval...

286

Delegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy's primary means of establishing policies, requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for Departmental elements and contractors. Directives Program Management Camille...

287

ORISE: Scientific Peer Review for State and Federal Agencies  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Scientific Peer Review Capabilities Overview Peer review planning Expert identification Peer review management Workshop coordination Process improvement How ORISE is making a...

288

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-1 -1 CHAPTER 10 SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT (Revised October 19, 2011) WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT? 1. To ensure contractors establish, document, and maintain adequate purchasing systems. 2. To ensure contractors flow down contract requirements to subcontractors. WHY IS SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? In many Department prime contracts a significant portion of the obligated dollars is spent on subcontract work. Due to the absence of a direct contractual relationship with the subcontractor, the Department must rely on the prime contractor to manage subcontract work. Subcontractors perform significant work efforts at sites and are an integral part of the site's success. Prime

289

Independent Oversight Review, Livermore Site Office - October...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Review, Livermore Site Office - October 2011 October 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office This report provides the...

290

Independent Oversight Review, Bonneville Power Administration...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

and Security, conduct an independent review of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) safety management program. The review is one of several BPA initiatives to improve...

291

Peer Review in Academic Promotion and Publishing: Its Meaning, Locus, and Future  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Kelner. 2008. Reviewing Peer Review. Science 321 (July 4).Brown, Tracey. 2009. Peer Review Survey 2009: PreliminaryByron. 2009. Managing Peer Review Online. Presentation at

Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia Krzys

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

Readiness Review RM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Readiness Review Module Readiness Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R Readin Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan ness Rev view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) view e pplicability D-3 EMENT CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-

293

Biological and Environmental Research Network Requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) is the primary provider of network connectivity for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science (SC), the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States. In support of SC programs, ESnet regularly updates and refreshes its understanding of the networking requirements of the instruments, facilities, scientists, and science programs that it serves. This focus has helped ESnet be a highly successful enabler of scientific discovery for over 25 years. In November 2012, ESnet and the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) of the DOE SC organized a review to characterize the networking requirements of the programs funded by the BER program office. Several key findings resulted from the review. Among them: 1) The scale of data sets available to science collaborations continues to increase exponentially. This has broad impact, both on the network and on the computational and storage systems connected to the network. 2) Many science collaborations require assistance to cope with the systems and network engineering challenges inherent in managing the rapid growth in data scale. 3) Several science domains operate distributed facilities that rely on high-performance networking for success. Key examples illustrated in this report include the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) and the Systems Biology Knowledgebase (KBase). This report expands on these points, and addresses others as well. The report contains a findings section as well as the text of the case studies discussed at the review.

Dart, Eli; Tierney, Brian

2013-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

A 17025:2005A 17025:2005 Management SystemManagement System  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A 17025:2005A 17025:2005 Management SystemManagement System Made SimpleMade Simple What to think about when reviewingWhat to think about when reviewing the Management Systemthe Management System #12 to have Technical expertise?expertise? #12;4 Management SystemManagement System OwnershipOwnership It

295

PEER REVIEW PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Institute for Regulatory Science (RS) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) jointly estab lished a peer-review program. As the program evolved, four types of review were established. A process for stakeholder participation in peer review eetings was also developed. While a committee established by the ASME provided oversight to the peer-review process, the RSI managed the day-to-day operations of peer review panels. In addition to the reports resulting from peer review of specific projects, several documents were prepared to facilitate the review process, all of which were widely distributed.

MOGHISSI, A ALAN; LOVE, BETTY R; STRAJA, SORIN R

2007-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

296

A case study review of technical and technology issues for transition of a utility load management program to provide system reliability resources in restructured electricity markets  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Issues for Transition of a Utility Load Management ProgramSCE’s load management system is to transition from providinga transition from SCE’s current load management system to an

Weller, G.H.

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Energy management  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper is a review of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) Program, which oversees the extensive subcontracting activities of the Department's management and operating (M and O) contractors. This review is part of a special GAO audit effort to help ensure that areas vulnerable to fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement are identified and that adequate corrective actions are taken. This effort focuses on 16 areas, one of which is DOE contractor oversight. This report describes the subcontracting deficiencies occurring at DOE, identifies shortcomings in DOE's CPSR Program, and discusses the corrective actions that DOE has committed to take in its CPSR Program in response to these findings.

Glenn, J.

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

Tools of the Job Queries, Reports, Resources Account Management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Tools of the Job ­ Queries, Reports, Resources Account Management The minimum required review trans detail, Ledger, grants award, and Invoice tables. The invoice tables are used by the dean's office of a grant or contract such as the chartstring, begin date, end date, sponsor, etc. The ledger data contains

299

Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Department of Energy Complex - May  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Department of Energy Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Department of Energy Complex - May 2000 Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Department of Energy Complex - May 2000 May 2000 Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the Department of Energy Complex The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is required to maintain a comprehensive emergency management system to ensure that DOE is prepared to protect workers, the public, the environment, and national security in the event of an accident or emergency. Following a chemical explosion at DOE's Hanford site in May 1997, an independent oversight evaluation of emergency management programs across the DOE complex was conducted. That evaluation, completed in early 1998, concluded that, despite a series of 1997 Secretarial initiatives on emergency management, the programs at DOE

300

Sealed source peer review plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Sealed sources are known quantities of radioactive materials that have been encapsulated in quantities that produce known radiation fields. Sealed sources have multiple uses ranging from instrument calibration sources to sources that produce radiation fields for experimental applications. The Off-Site Source Recovery (OSR) Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), created in 1999, under the direction of the Waste Management Division of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Albuquerque has been assigned the responsibility to recover and manage excess and unwanted radioactive sealed sources from the public and private sector. LANL intends to ship drums containing qualified sealed sources to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for disposal. Prior to shipping, these drums must be characterized with respect to radiological content and other parameters. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires that ten radionulcides be quantified and reported for every container of waste to be disposed in the WIPP. The methods traditionally approved by the EPA include non-destructive assay (NDA) in accordance with Appendix A of the Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (DOE, 2002) (CH WAC). However, because of the nature and pedigree of historical records for sealed sources and the technical infeasibility of performing NDA on these sources, LANL proposes to characterize the content of these waste drums using qualified existing radiological data in lieu of direct measurement. This plan describes the process and documentation requirements for the use of the peer review process to qualify existing data for sealed radiological sources in lieu of perfonning radioassay. The peer review process will be performed in accordance with criteria provided in 40 CFR {section} 194.22 which specifies the use of the NUREG 1297 guidelines. The plan defines the management approach, resources, schedule, and technical requirements for the subject peer review.

Feldman, Alexander [Los Alamos National Laboratory; Leonard, Lee [RETIRED; Burns, Ron [CONTRACTOR

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Order Module--DOE O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

35.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 35.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Order Module--DOE O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management, was issued by DOE in September 1988. As early as 1990, DOE began analyzing, assessing, and reviewing the process of implementing the Order. DOE revised the Order on radioactive waste management for several reasons: - After thorough technical reviews and analyses, DOE and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board concluded that DOE Order 5820.2A did not adequately address the Department's radioactive waste management and disposal practices. -There had been significant advances in radioactive waste management practices and changes in DOE since the Order was issued in 1988. - Risk-based and performance-based requirements were determined to be

302

Order Module--DOE O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Order Module--DOE O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management, was issued by DOE in September 1988. As early as 1990, DOE began analyzing, assessing, and reviewing the process of implementing the Order. DOE revised the Order on radioactive waste management for several reasons: - After thorough technical reviews and analyses, DOE and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board concluded that DOE Order 5820.2A did not adequately address the Department's radioactive waste management and disposal practices. -There had been significant advances in radioactive waste management practices and changes in DOE since the Order was issued in 1988. - Risk-based and performance-based requirements were determined to be

303

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- September 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

304

Microsoft Word - HSW-EIS-Review-Report-Rev-6.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

(EIS) Data Quality, Control and Management Issues Review Report ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ... IV...

305

Enterprise Assessments Review, West Valley Demonstration Project – December 2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness

306

Inspection of Emergency Management at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant- Volume II, August 2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Secretary of Energy’s Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health and emergency management programs at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in July and August 2002. The inspection was performed as a joint effort by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations and the Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This volume discusses the results of the review of the WIPP emergency management program. The results of the review of the WIPP environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs are discussed in Volume I of this report, and the combined results are discussed in a summary report. The results of this review indicate that, overall, CBFO and WTS have effectively addressed nearly all of the weaknesses identified during the May 2000 OA emergency management review. Furthermore, as a consequence of that effort, CBFO and WTS have implemented a hazardous material emergency management program that, with few exceptions, meets Departmental expectations for providing a system that protects responders, site workers, and the public in the event of an emergency at WIPP. Section 2 of this volume provides an overall discussion of the results of the review of the WIPP emergency management program, including positive aspects, findings, and other items requiring management attention. Section 3 provides OA’s conclusions regarding the overall effectiveness of CBFO and WTS management of the emergency management program. Section 4 presents the ratings assigned as a result of this review. Appendix A provides supplemental information, including team composition. Appendix B identifies the findings that require corrective action and follow-up. Appendices C- F detail the results of the reviews of individual emergency management program elements.

307

Greater-than-Class C low-level radioactive waste transportation regulations and requirements study. National Low-Level Waste Management Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to identify the regulations and requirements for transporting greater-than-Class C (GTCC) low-level radioactive waste (LLW) and to identify planning activities that need to be accomplished in preparation for transporting GTCC LLW. The regulations and requirements for transporting hazardous materials, of which GTCC LLW is included, are complex and include several Federal agencies, state and local governments, and Indian tribes. This report is divided into five sections and three appendices. Section 1 introduces the report. Section 2 identifies and discusses the transportation regulations and requirements. The regulations and requirements are divided into Federal, state, local government, and Indian tribes subsections. This report does not identify the regulations or requirements of specific state, local government, and Indian tribes, since the storage, treatment, and disposal facility locations and transportation routes have not been specifically identified. Section 3 identifies the planning needed to ensure that all transportation activities are in compliance with the regulations and requirements. It is divided into (a) transportation packaging; (b) transportation operations; (c) system safety and risk analysis, (d) route selection; (e) emergency preparedness and response; and (f) safeguards and security. This section does not provide actual planning since the details of the Department of Energy (DOE) GTCC LLW Program have not been finalized, e.g., waste characterization and quantity, storage, treatment and disposal facility locations, and acceptance criteria. Sections 4 and 5 provide conclusions and referenced documents, respectively.

Tyacke, M.; Schmitt, R.

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

Review and selection of unsaturated flow models  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Under the US Department of Energy (DOE), the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management and Operating Contractor (CRWMS M&O) has the responsibility to review, evaluate, and document existing computer ground-water flow models; to conduct performance assessments; and to develop performance assessment models, where necessary. In the area of scientific modeling, the M&O CRWMS has the following responsibilities: To provide overall management and integration of modeling activities. To provide a framework for focusing modeling and model development. To identify areas that require increased or decreased emphasis. To ensure that the tools necessary to conduct performance assessment are available. These responsibilities are being initiated through a three-step process. It consists of a thorough review of existing models, testing of models which best fit the established requirements, and making recommendations for future development that should be conducted. Future model enhancement will then focus on the models selected during this activity. Furthermore, in order to manage future model development, particularly in those areas requiring substantial enhancement, the three-step process will be updated and reported periodically in the future.

NONE

1993-09-10T23:59:59.000Z

309

The Bachelor of Management degree in Information Systems is a minimum of 40 courses in length. Admission to the Faculty may occur at the end of Year One. Students are required to have completed the following courses, with a  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Bachelor of Management degree in Information Systems is a minimum of 40 courses in length to admission. BachelorofManagement InformationSystems Name Systems Management Management 3080 - Managerial Skill Development Management 3821 - Visual Programming

Seldin, Jonathan P.

310

Transportation System Requirements Document  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Transportation System Requirements Document (Trans-SRD) describes the functions to be performed by and the technical requirements for the Transportation System to transport spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) from Purchaser and Producer sites to a Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) site, and between CRWMS sites. The purpose of this document is to define the system-level requirements for Transportation consistent with the CRWMS Requirement Document (CRD). These requirements include design and operations requirements to the extent they impact on the development of the physical segments of Transportation. The document also presents an overall description of Transportation, its functions, its segments, and the requirements allocated to the segments and the system-level interfaces with Transportation. The interface identification and description are published in the CRWMS Interface Specification.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Financial Management Oversight  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order defines requirements for effective financial management and adherence to DOE and applicable external financial management requirements and sets forth standards for ensuring the integrity and responsiveness of financial management and the accuracy and reliability of DOEs financial statements. Cancels DOE O 2200.13.

2006-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

312

2009 Annual Summary Report for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada: Review of the Performance Assessments and Composite Analysis  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office performed an annual review of the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Wate Management Site (RWMS) Performance Assessments (PAs) and Composite Analyses (CAs) in fiscal year (FY) 2009. This annual summary report presents data and conclusions from the FY 2009 review, and determines the adequacy of the PAs and CAs. Operational factors (e.g., waste forms and containers, facility design, and waste receipts), closure plans, monitoring results, and research and development (R&D) activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the PAs. Likewise, the environmental restoration activities at the Nevada Test Site relevant to the sources of residual radioactive material that are considered in the CAs, the land-use planning, and the results of the environmental monitoring and R&D activities were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the CAs.

NSTec Environmental Management

2010-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

313

Electric Motor Thermal Management | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Merit Review and Peer Evaluation ape030bennion2011o.pdf More Documents & Publications Motor Thermal Control Electric Motor Thermal Management Electric Motor Thermal Management...

314

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE prepared this report in response to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review."

315

Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Nuclear Physics  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Science at NERSC HPC Requirements Reviews Requirements for Science: Target 2014 Nuclear Physics (NP) Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Nuclear Physics:...

316

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - April 2010 April 2010 Review of Specific Administrative Controls at DOE Nuclear Facilities The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health Safety and Security occasionally reviews specific focus areas. Focus areas are aspects of safety programs that Independent Oversight determines warrant increased management attention based on reviews of performance data, inspection results, and operating experience across DOE sites. Due, in part, to operating experience and previous inspection results. DOE selected specific administrative controls (SACs) as a focus area. SACs are new or revised technical safety requirements (TSRs)

317

Waste Management Quality Assurance Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The WMG QAP is an integral part of a management system designed to ensure that WMG activities are planned, performed, documented, and verified in a manner that assures a quality product. A quality product is one that meets all waste acceptance criteria, conforms to all permit and regulatory requirements, and is accepted at the offsite treatment, storage, and disposal facility. In addition to internal processes, this QA Plan identifies WMG processes providing oversight and assurance to line management that waste is managed according to all federal, state, and local requirements for waste generator areas. A variety of quality assurance activities are integral to managing waste. These QA functions have been identified in the relevant procedures and in subsequent sections of this plan. The WMG QAP defines the requirements of the WMG quality assurance program. These requirements are derived from Department of Energy (DOE) Order 414.1C, Quality Assurance, Contractor Requirements Document, the LBNL Operating and Assurance Program Plan (OAP), and other applicable environmental compliance documents. The QAP and all associated WMG policies and procedures are periodically reviewed and revised, as necessary, to implement corrective actions, and to reflect changes that have occurred in regulations, requirements, or practices as a result of feedback on work performed or lessons learned from other organizations. The provisions of this QAP and its implementing documents apply to quality-affecting activities performed by the WMG; WMG personnel, contractors, and vendors; and personnel from other associated LBNL organizations, except where such contractors, vendors, or organizations are governed by their own WMG-approved QA programs.

Waste Management Group

2006-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

318

Mn/DOT's Project Peer Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Mn/DOT's Project Management Peer Review Creating a Project Management Culture 2010 CTS Research and perspectives ·Peer Review Process and Results ·Construction Industry Perspective ·Next Steps ·Q & A #12;Why a Peer Review? Why Project Management? ·Improve project delivery performance ­ on time, on budget (an

Minnesota, University of

319

Management of Nuclear Materials  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish requirements for the lifecycle management of DOE owned and/or managed accountable nuclear materials. Cancels DOE O 410.2. Admin Chg 1 dated 4-10-2014, cancels DOE O 410.2.

2009-08-17T23:59:59.000Z

320

Risk Management Guide  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides non-mandatory risk management approaches for implementing the requirements of DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets. Cancels DOE G 413.3-7.

2011-01-18T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Mandatory Supervisory Training Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mandatory Supervisory Training Requirements Mandatory Supervisory Training Requirements All DOE supervisors, managers, and executives will comply with mandatory supervisory training requirements (5 CFR 412; 5 CFR 315.801; 5 CFR 315.901; DOE O 360.1; and DOE O 320.1): * New supervisors: 80 hours of supervisory training, with 40 hours required to be completed during the supervisory probationary period. * Experienced supervisors: minimum of 8 hours of supervisory training each year. The Office of Learning and Workforce Development has developed an inventory of training and developmental activities that will meet the supervisory training requirements. The DOE courses Supervisory Essentials (32 hours) and Navigating the Federal Hiring Process (8 hours) are required to fulfill the first year 40-hour training

322

Risk and Work Configuration Management as a Function of Integrated Safety Management  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), has established a work management program and corresponding electronic Facilities and Operations Management Information System (e-FOM) to implement Integrated Safety Management (ISM). The management of work scopes, the identification of hazards, and the establishment of implementing controls are reviewed and approved through electronic signatures. Through the execution of the program and the implementation of the electronic system, NSTec staff work within controls and utilize feedback and improvement process. The Integrated Work Control Manual further implements the five functions of ISM at the Activity level. By adding the Risk and Work Configuration Management program, NSTec establishes risk acceptance (business and physical) for liabilities within the performance direction and work management processes. Requirements, roles, and responsibilities are specifically identified in the program while e-FOM provides the interface and establishes the flowdown from the Safety Chain to work and facilities management processes to company work-related directives, and finally to Subject Matter Expert concurrence. The Program establishes, within the defined management structure, management levels for risk identification, risk mitigation (controls), and risk acceptance (business and physical) within the Safety Chain of Responsibility. The Program also implements Integrated Safeguards and Security Management within the NSTec Safety Chain of Responsibility. Once all information has been entered into e-FOM, approved, and captured as data, the information becomes searchable and sortable by hazard, location, organization, mitigating controls, etc.

Lana Buehrer, Michele Kelly, Fran Lemieux, Fred Williams

2007-11-30T23:59:59.000Z

323

Management Overview  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Immobilization Research Immobilization Research Kurt Gerdes U.S. DOE, Office of Engineering and Technology John Vienna Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Environmental Management May 19, 2009 2009 Hanford - Idaho - Savannah River Technical Exchange 2 Objectives Perform research and development to advance the waste stabilization technology options by through closely- coupled theory, experimentation, and modeling Develop solutions for Hanford, Idaho, Savannah River, and Oak Ridge wastes challenges (along with facilitating management of future wastes) Environmental Management General Approach Balance between near-term incremental technology improvements and long-term transformational solutions Address the requirements for high risk waste streams - high-level tank waste (RPP, SRS)

324

Federal Metering Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation—given at the Spring 2013 Federal Utility Partnership Working Group (FUPWG) meeting—covers the 42 USC 8253 Energy Management Requirement; Executive Order 13514(g) High-Performance Sustainable Federal Buildings; federal metering needs, history, and status; and utility/agency opportunities.

325

Requirements Definition Stage  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This chapter addresses development of a Software Configuration Management Plan to track and control work products, analysis of the system owner/users' business processes and needs, translation of those processes and needs into formal requirements, and planning the testing activities to validate the performance of the software product.

1997-05-21T23:59:59.000Z

326

CRAD, Chemical Management Implementation - June 30, 2011 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chemical Management Implementation - June 30, 2011 Chemical Management Implementation - June 30, 2011 CRAD, Chemical Management Implementation - June 30, 2011 June 30, 2011 Chemical Management Implementation Inspection Criteria, Approach, and Lines of Inquiry (HSS CRAD 45-31, Rev. 1) This document provides an overview of the Criteria, Activities, and Lines of Inquiry that will be used to collect information to evaluate the chemical management against DOE policy, regulatory requirements. Primary attention will be given to activities governed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Hazard Communication Standards (29 CFR 1910.1200 and 29 CFR 1926.59) and Occupational Exposure to Chemicals in Laboratories (29 CFR 1910.1450). However, review of any activities for managing, storing, or using hazardous chemicals, pesticides, and toxic

327

CRAD, Chemical Management Implementation - June 30, 2011 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chemical Management Implementation - June 30, 2011 Chemical Management Implementation - June 30, 2011 CRAD, Chemical Management Implementation - June 30, 2011 June 30, 2011 Chemical Management Implementation Inspection Criteria, Approach, and Lines of Inquiry (HSS CRAD 45-31, Rev. 1) This document provides an overview of the Criteria, Activities, and Lines of Inquiry that will be used to collect information to evaluate the chemical management against DOE policy, regulatory requirements. Primary attention will be given to activities governed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Hazard Communication Standards (29 CFR 1910.1200 and 29 CFR 1926.59) and Occupational Exposure to Chemicals in Laboratories (29 CFR 1910.1450). However, review of any activities for managing, storing, or using hazardous chemicals, pesticides, and toxic

328

FEMP Peer Review | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

FEMP Peer Review FEMP Peer Review Report summarizes the findings of the Federal Energy Management Program Peer Review Panel conducted over a three-day period in September 2005....

329

Identity, Credential, and Access Management (ICAM)  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish requirements and responsibilities for DOE identity, credential, and access management program.

2013-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

330

Full SPP Partnership Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Partnership Requirements: Partnership Requirements: ENERGY STAR Partnership for Commercial & Industrial Service and Product Providers (SPP) Eligible Organizations Companies providing energy efficiency services and products to commercial buildings and industrial manufacturing facilities/plants are eligible for the Service and Product Provider (SPP) partnership, but must meet certain requirements as specified below. Types of eligible companies include: architecture, distributor, energy consultant/energy management services, energy improvement contractor, energy information services, energy services company (ESCO), engineering, equipment manufacturer, financial services, on-site energy production services, unregulated energy retailer and marketer, or other supplier of standard energy-efficient products and/or services for commercial buildings and/or

331

Greenhouse Gas Management Program Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Fact sheet describes the federal requirements for GHG emissions management, FEMP services to help agencies reduce emissions, and additional resources.

332

Acquisition and Project Management Continuous Improvement Presentation...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Occupational Safety Performance Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Safeguards and Security - August 2012 Report on Acquisition and Project Management Continuous...

333

Contract Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contract Contract Management SLAC Site Office (SSO) SSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information SLAC Site Office U.S. Department of Energy Bldg 41, M/S 08A 2575 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 P: (650) 926-2505 Contract Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page SLAC Site Office (SSO) communicates and enforces contract requirements; reviews and approves contract performance and deliverables, and provides Contracting Officer direction and guidance to the SLAC National Accelerator Center (SLAC). SSO provides support for all contract, business operations and administrative matters. SSO reviews, approves and oversees business operations and administrative systems such as budget; financial management;

334

Scientific and Technical Information (STI) Managers | Scientific and  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

Scientific and Technical Information (STI) Managers Scientific and Technical Information (STI) Managers Print page Print page Email page Email page The role of the STI Manager is to stay abreast of DOE's STI Program and coordinate the implementation of STIP best practices at their sites. In general, an STI Manager's responsibilities include: Providing oversight and coordination of contractor compliance with the Contractor Requirements Document of DOE Order 241.1B. - Coordinating the implementation of appropriate sensitivity reviews and release procedures. - Serving as Releasing Official or coordinating designation of Releasing Official(s), including notifying OSTI of such. - Ensuring STI and announcement notices are appropriately reviewed and marked. - Ensuring STI products and associated announcement notices are provided to

335

Integrated Safety Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Safety Management BEHAVIOR (SAFETY CULTURE) - principles of behavior (values) - align motivations PLAN WORK define project scope define facility functional requirements define and...

336

Advisory Committee Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Manual provides detailed DOE requirements, responsibilities, processes, and procedures for the establishment, operation, and management of advisory committees. Cancels DOE M 510.1-1.

2007-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

337

Change Control Management Guide  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Guide provides a suggested approach and uniform guidance for managing project and contract changes through applying the requirements of DOE O 413.3B. No cancellation.

2011-07-29T23:59:59.000Z

338

Management Control Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish requirements and responsibilities for the Department of Energy Management Control Program. Cancels DOE O 413.1. Canceled by DOE O 413.1B.

2002-04-18T23:59:59.000Z

339

Records Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order sets forth requirements and responsibilities for implementing and maintaining a cost-effective records management program throughout the Department of Energy.

2006-02-03T23:59:59.000Z

340

Records Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order sets forth requirements and responsibilities for establishing and maintaining a program for the efficient and economical management of records and information assets.

2011-07-26T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Federal Metering Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Metering Requirements Metering Requirements FUPWG - May 23, 2013 Brad Gustafson Federal Energy Management Program 2 42 USC 8253 - ENERGY MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT (e) Metering By October 1, 2012, in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary under paragraph (2), all Federal buildings shall, for the purposes of efficient use of energy and reduction in the cost of electricity used in such buildings, be metered. Each agency shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, advanced meters or advanced metering devices that provide data at least daily and that measure at least hourly consumption of electricity in the Federal buildings of the agency. Not later than October 1, 2016, each agency shall provide for equivalent metering of natural gas and steam, in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary

342

Office of Document Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Office of Document Reviews ensures that all documents prepared at DOE Headquarters are properly marked to identify the level and category of protected information they contain (if any) and to ensure that all documents the Department prepares or is required to review under applicable statutes for public release contain no information requiring protection under law, regulations and Executive orders.

343

Earned Value Management System RM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Earned Value Management System Review Module Earned Value Management System Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O Ea 0 OFFICE OF arned Va C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R alue Man Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan agement view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) t System e pplicability D-3 EMENT (EVMS) CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-1189-2008,

344

VFP: Program Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Program Requirements Program Requirements Home Welcome Researcher! Preparing for Your Visit Your Arrival Your First Day Weekly Activities Program Requirements Checkout FAQ The DOE WDTS site has comprehensive information on Participant Obligations. Consult that site for more information on all deliverables except the Fermilab Summer Interns website. Attendance: Complete the full ten-week program and attend all scheduled events including lectures, tours and group activities. Entrance Survey: Complete the entrance survey within your first week at Fermilab. One-page Peer Review Provide a one-page written peer review of another SULI intern' talk or poster. Abstract for General Audience Complete and submit an abstract summarizing your research experience. Oral or Poster Presentation: Deliver an oral or poster presentation to mentors and peers the final week

345

SULI: Program Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Program Requirements Program Requirements Home Welcome Intern! Preparing for Your Internship Your Arrival Your First Day Weekly Activities Program Requirements Checkout FAQ The DOE WDTS site has comprehensive information on Participant Obligations. Consult that site for more information on all deliverables except the Fermilab Summer Interns website. Attendance: Complete the full ten-week program and attend all scheduled events including lectures, tours and group activities. Entrance Survey: First create an account by following the link, educationLink New Account Setup. After creating the account, you can login to the educationLink site. Complete the entrance survey posted on your EduLink site within your first week at Fermilab. One-page Peer Review Provide a one-page written peer review of another SULI intern' talk or

346

Identification of permit and waste acceptance criteria provisions requiring modification for acceptance of commercial mixed waste. National Low-Level Waste Management Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In October 1990, representatives of States and compact regions requested that the US Department of Energy (DOE) explore an agreement with host States and compact regions under which DOE would accept commercial mixed low-level radioactive waste (LLW) at DOE`s own treatment and disposal facilities. A program for DOE management of commercial mixed waste is made potentially more attractive in light of the low commercial mixed waste volumes, high regulatory burdens, public opposition to new disposal sites, and relatively high cost of constructing commercial disposal facilities. Several studies were identified as essential in determining the feasibility of DOE accepting commercial mixed waste for disposal. The purpose of this report is to identify any current or proposed waste acceptance criteria (WAC) or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provisions that would have to be modified for commercial mixed waste acceptance at specified DOE facilities. Following the introduction, Section 2 of this report (a) provides a background summary of existing and proposed mixed waste disposal facilities at each DOE site, and (b) summarizes the status of any RCRA Part B permit and WAC provisions relating to the disposal of mixed waste, including provisions relating to acceptance of offsite waste. Section 3 provides overall conclusions regarding the current status and permit modifications that must be implemented in order to grant DOE sites authority under their permits to accept commercial mixed waste for disposal. Section 4 contains a list of references.

Not Available

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

Management Plan Management Plan  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

; and 5) consistency with the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act. In addition, the management plan Plan, Management Plan Page MP­ 1 #12;Management Plan water quality standards, instream flows, privateManagement Plan Management Plan "Management and restoration programs for native salmonids have

348

Rediness Review Team Leader Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

LEADER LEADER TRAINING Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Michael Hillman DOE-HSS HQ Dan M. Stover, PE Technical And Professional Services, Inc. November 10 2010 Official DOE Team Leader Readiness Review Training November 10, 2010 READINESS REVIEW TEAM LEADER TRAINING Introduction & Course Conduct Readiness Review Official DOE Team Leader Readiness Review Training TRAINING READINESS REVIEW TEAM LEADER TRAINING Purpose of this Course Provide prospective Readiness Review Team Leaders with: -An understanding of the Team Leader Roles and Responsibilities -Methods to control team dynamics -Methods to manage interaction with the assessed organization Methods to manage interaction with the assessed organization

349

Review Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Safety & Emergency Management Evaluations Safety & Emergency Management Evaluations » Review Reports Review Reports December 31, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Pantex Plant, December 2013 Targeted Review of the Safety Significant Blast Door and Personnel Door Interlock Systems and Review of Federal Assurance Capability at the Pantex Plant December 30, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Facility - December 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program and Fire Protection Systems at the Transuranic Waste Processing Center December 13, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - December 2013 Review of the Technical Area 55 Safety Class Fire Suppression System at Los Alamos National Laboratory December 13, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security Site, December 2013

350

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 6.1 (July 2011) Chapter 6.1 (July 2011) 1 Competition Requirements [Reference: FAR 6 and DEAR 906] Overview This section discusses competition requirements and provides a model Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC). Background The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984 requires that all acquisitions be made using full and open competition. Seven exceptions to using full and open competition are specifically identified in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.3. Documentation justifying the use of any of these exceptions is required. The exception, with supporting documentation, must be certified and approved at certain levels that vary according to the dollar value of the

351

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Chapter 6.1 (February 2011) 1 Competition Requirements [Reference: FAR 6 and DEAR 906] Overview This section discusses competition requirements and provides a model Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC). Background The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984 requires that all acquisitions be made using full and open competition. Seven exceptions to using full and open competition are specifically identified in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.3. Documentation justifying the use of any of these exceptions is required. The exception, with supporting documentation, must

352

CRAD, Emergency Management Program – February 13, 2014 (HSS CRAD 45-60, Rev. 0)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Emergency Management Program Inspection Criteria and Review Approach Document - 2014 Emergency Management Program Technical Basis and Emergency Preparedness Review (HSS CRAD 45-60, Rev. 0)

353

FAQS Job Task Analyses - DOE AVIATION MANAGER (AvM)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MANAGER (AvM) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS MANAGER (AvM) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS Job Analysis Worksheet for Tasks DOE AVIATION MANAGER Task Source Importance Frequency A Establishes goals for the field aviation program based on the anticipated requirements as applicable to DOE/NNSA, the field element, and other DOE/NNSA organizations that may require aviation services. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 5 1 B Implements DOE/NNSA aviation management and safety policy and establishes the field element's standards for the aviation program that will ensure an effective, safe, secure and cost-efficient operation in accordance with this Order. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 5 2 C Develops the organization's Aviation Implementation Documents (AID) and annually reviews the AID to ensure that it is current. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 5 1

354

HPC Program Reviews  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) High Energy Physics (HEP) Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Requirements for Science: Target 2014 Overview Published Reports Case Study FAQs Home » Science at NERSC » HPC Requirements Reviews HPC Requirements Reviews In support of its mission and to maintain its reputation as one of the best run scientific computing centers in the world, NERSC continually gathers requirements from its user community, the DOE Office of Science program offices, and from other key HPC or domain experts. These requirements are collected via a series of NERSC Program Requirements Reviews with each of the six DOE Office of Science program offices. The first set of reviews ran from May 2009 through May 2011 and resulted in

355

Managing Critical Management Improvement Initiatives  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Provides requirements and responsibilities for planning, executing and assessing critical management improvement initiatives within DOE. DOE N 251.59, dated 9/27/2004, extends this Notice until 10/01/2005. Archived 11-8-10. Does not cancel other directives.

2003-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

356

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Management Guidance  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Guidance Guidance The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides guidance on Federal laws and regulations related to energy management. General Guidance for Facilities Overview of Federal Energy Management Policy and Mandates: Guidance document outlining Federal energy management goals and requirements for Federal energy managers. Sustainability Requirement Crosswalk: Crosswalk of sustainability and energy goals and targets within executive orders and other statutes. Guidelines Establishing Criteria for Excluding Buildings from the Energy Performance Requirements of Section 543 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act as Amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005): Guidelines that established criteria for exclusions from the energy performance requirement for a fiscal year or any Federal building or collection of Federal buildings within the statutory framework provided by the law.

357

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS Juneau, AK 99802 (907) 586-7228 Abstract: This Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review For Amendment 89 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management

358

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review for Proposed Amendment 94 to the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review for Proposed Amendment 94 to the Fishery....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Regulatory Impact Review Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska Revising the vessel use caps applicable to quota share

359

NVLAP Assessor Training Syllabus Self-Declaration of Review of Training Topics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

NVLAP Assessor Training Syllabus Self-Declaration of Review of Training Topics Instructions: This syllabus provides the general topics required for training Lead Assessors and Technical Assessors, along with links to the respective training resources.* Please contact the Program Manager for any program

360

Supervisory Training Requirements | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Supervisory Training Requirements Supervisory Training Requirements Supervisory Training Requirements The Office of Learning and Workforce Development has developed an inventory of training and developmental activities that will meet the supervisory training requirements. The DOE courses, Supervisory Essentials and Navigating the Federal Hiring Process are required to fulfill the first 40-hour of the probationary period mandatory training requirement for new supervisors. All other courses listed in the training framework are suggested to meet overall continual learning requirements. Supervisory Training Requirements More Documents & Publications EM's Development Program for New Managers/Supervisors Presentation DOE F 3315.1 Supervisory - Non-Supervisory Employee Performance Management and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Materials Capability Review Los Alamos National Laboratory April 29-May 2, 2012  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) uses Capability Reviews to assess the quality and institutional integration of science, technology and engineering (STE) and to advise Laboratory Management on the current and future health of LANL STE. The capabilities are deliberately chosen to be crosscutting over the Laboratory and therefore will include experimental, theoretical and simulation disciplines from multiple line organizations. Capability Reviews are designed to provide a more holistic view of the STE quality, integration to achieve mission requirements, and mission relevance. The scope of these capabilities necessitate that there will be significant overlap in technical areas covered by capability reviews (e.g., materials research and weapons science and engineering). In addition, LANL staff may be reviewed in different capability reviews because of their varied assignments and expertise. The principal product of the Capability Review is the report that includes the review committee's assessments, recommendations, and recommendations for STE.

Taylor, Antoinette J [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

362

E-Print Network 3.0 - albuterol safety review Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Group Manager Summary: Review, Electrical Safety, Firearms Safety, Interlock Safety, LockoutTagout J. Ellerkamp: Injury... SHSD Manager E. Nowak Safety Engineering Group Manager...

363

Requirements for security signalling  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

There has been some interest lately in the need for ``authenticated signalling``, and the development of signalling specifications by the ATM Forum that support this need. The purpose of this contribution is to show that if authenticated signalling is required, then supporting signalling facilities for directory services (i.e. key management) are also required. Furthermore, this contribution identifies other security related mechanisms that may also benefit from ATM-level signalling accommodations. For each of these mechanisms outlined here, an overview of the signalling issues and a rough cut at the required fields for supporting Information Elements are provided. Finally, since each of these security mechanisms are specified by a number of different standards, issues pertaining to the selection of a particular security mechanism at connection setup time (i.e. specification of a required ``Security Quality of Service``) are also discussed.

Pierson, L.G.; Tarman, T.D.

1995-02-05T23:59:59.000Z

364

Delegation Procedures - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Accessibility Text size: (Requires JavaScript) Large Normal Small This site uses the Open Source Content Management System Plone and has been designed to be completely accessible...

365

Deriving Policies from Grid Security Requirements Model  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The emerging Grid applications require rigorous approaches to handle security management issues as their scale, heterogeneity, ... , we propose a rigorous method of deriving security policies for grid application...

Syed Naqvi; Alvaro E. Arenas…

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Repository seals requirement study  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project, managed by the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) Management and Operating Contractor (M and O) is conducting investigations to support the Viability Assessment and the License Application for a high-level nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The sealing subsystem is part of the Yucca Mountain Waste Isolation System. The Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project is currently evaluating the role of the sealing subsystem (shaft, ramp and exploratory borehole seals) in achieving the overall performance objectives for the Waste Isolation System. This report documents the results of those evaluations. The objective of the study is to provide water or air flow performance based requirements for shafts, ramps, and exploratory boreholes located near the repository. Recommendations, as appropriate, are provided for developing plans, seals component testing, and other studies relating to sealing.

NONE

1997-11-03T23:59:59.000Z

367

Richard Gerber! Harvey Wasserman! Requirements Reviews Organizers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

usAficaAon f or A SCR b udget r equests - QuanFtaFve r equirements - Documented n eeds f rom s cience t eams * Basis f or N ERSC 7 a nd N ERSC 8 M ission N eed documents *...

368

NERSC/DOE HEP Requirements Review Participants  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

for ASCR Stefan Hoeche SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Particle physics phenomenology, in particular perturbative QCD and the construction of Monte Carlo event...

369

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review / Initial Regulatory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Secretarial Review Draft Regulatory Impact Review / Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Proposed Amendment 42 to the Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands King and Tanner � Public review Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Crab Fisheries October 2012 ii #12;Modification of economic

370

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW /  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SECRETARIAL REVIEW DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT / REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW / INITIAL REGULATORY RIR Regulatory Impact Review RP Central GOA Rockfish Program RP CV Rockfish Program Catcher Vessel RPA FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For a proposed Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf

371

Required Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Required Documents Required Documents Required Documents All foreign nationals, including students and postdocs, must select the foreign nationals employment category to complete the new-hire process. Contact (505) 665-7158 Email Complete following forms before New-Hire Orientation Be sure to bring the forms with you for the orientation event, but do not sign and date: Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (pdf) - original, unexpired documents for verification of employment eligibility. Please refer to the I-9 verification form titled, "Lists of Acceptable Documents", which was included with your offer letter. (Laminated documents or hospital/temporary birth certificates are not accepted.) Note: Failure to provide required documents will result in delay and/or

372

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 6.1 (April 2009) Chapter 6.1 (April 2009) Competition Requirements [Reference: FAR 6 and DEAR 906] Overview This section discusses competition requirements and provides a model Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC). Background The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984 requires that all acquisitions be made using full and open competition. Seven exceptions to using full and open competition are specifically identified in FAR Part 6. Documentation justifying the use of any of these exceptions is required. The exception, with supporting documentation, must be certified and approved at certain levels that vary according to the dollar value of the acquisition. The information that must be included in each justification is

373

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 6.1 (April 2010) Chapter 6.1 (April 2010) 1 Competition Requirements [Reference: FAR 6 and DEAR 906] Overview This section discusses competition requirements and provides a model Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC). Background The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984 requires that all acquisitions be made using full and open competition. Seven exceptions to using full and open competition are specifically identified in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 6.3. Documentation justifying the use of any of these exceptions is required. The exception, with supporting documentation, must be certified and approved at certain levels that vary according to the dollar value of the acquisition. The information that must be included in each justification is identified in FAR

374

Quality Assurance Requirements and Description  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

QjCivilianRadioactive QjCivilianRadioactive Was'fe Management QA: QA QVALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND DESCRIPTION DOEIRW-0333P Revisiol1 20 Effective Date: 10-01-2008 LarrY Newman, DlrectQr Office of Quality As,surance ~~--~-_._._- Edward F. Spr at III, Di or Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Date I/Jf/4t' , . - - - Date OCRWM Title: Quality Assurance Requirements and Description DOEIRW-0333P, Revision 20 Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Quality Assurance Policy Page: 2 of 160 Successful implementation of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Quality Assurance (QA) program is essential for the OCRWM to carry out its mission. Our mission is to manage and dispose ofbigh-Ievel radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel in a manner that protects health, safety, and the environment; enhances national and energy security; and merits

375

Independent Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory- December 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Review of the Independent Integrated Safety Management/Integrated Work Management Assessment of Research and Development and Programmatic Work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory

376

The Importance of Peer Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The Importance of Peer Review ... Because it requires reviewers and Editors to make judgments and to evaluate and criticize the work of their peers, the Editors carefully choose reviewers using the following criteria: ... Often the authors of a manuscript that is rejected benefit most from these peer reviews that describe shortcomings and approaches to resolving them. ...

Heijia L. Wheeler; Willis B. Wheeler Associate Editorial Office Journal of Agricultural; Food Chemistry

2006-11-22T23:59:59.000Z

377

Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site Tank Farms - February...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

- February 2014 Independent Oversight Review, Hanford Site Tank Farms - February 2014 February 2014 Review of the Hanford Tank Farms Safety Management Program Implementation for...

378

Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Transuranic Waste Processing Center, September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center, September 2013 September 2013 Review of Management...

379

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - June 2012...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - June 2012 June 2012 Review of Electrical System Configuration Management, Safety Instrumented System Commercial Grade...

380

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - July 2011...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - July 2011 July 2011 Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Merit Review: EPAct State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

merit08bluestein.pdf More Documents & Publications OVTP Merit Review EPAct State & Alternative Fuel Provider Data Collection and Management Merit Review: EPAct State and...

382

Review of the Headquarters Facilities Emergency Response Plans  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2002 March 2002 Review of the Headquarters Facilities Emergency Response Plans OVERSIGHT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1 2.0 OVERVIEW OF RESULTS ........................................................ 3 3.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ...................................................... 5 3.1 Emergency Response Programs, Plans, and Procedures ....... 5 3.2 Emergency Management Requirements, Roles, and Responsibilities ............................................................... 8 3.3 Emergency Facilities and Equipment ................................... 10 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................... 12 5.0 OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENTS .............................

383

Long-Term Stewardship Science and Technology Requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To ensure technology developed for long-term stewardship will meet existing requirements, a review of requirements was performed. In addition to identifying existing science and technology related requirements, gaps and conflicts of requirements were identified.

McDonald, J.K.; Nickelson, R.A.

2002-05-16T23:59:59.000Z

384

Long-term Stewardship Science and Technology Requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To ensure technology developed for long-term stewardship will meet existing requirements, a review of requirements was performed. In addition to identifying existing science and technology related requirements, gaps and conflicts of requirements were identified.

Mcdonald, Jaimee Kristen; Nickelson, Reva Anne

2002-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

385

Standard Review Plan Overview  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision (CD) Milestones Review & Approval Standard Review Plan (SRP) E n v i r o n m e n t a l M a n a g e m e n t DOE - EM - SRP - 2010 2nd Edition Overview March 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 1 Standard Review Plan Overview Technical Framework for EM Projects Critical Decision Milestones Review and Approval The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation, and eventual disposition of mission-critical projects/facilities. Coupled with this ongoing mission is the added responsibility for EM to diligently leverage and apply American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds to accelerate the completion of its

386

DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: MINIMUM CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: MINIMUM CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS DOE CYBER SECURITY EBK: CORE COMPETENCY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS: CA Cybersecurity Program Manager (CSPM...

387

Information Collection Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Information Collection Management Information Collection Management The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 requires each Federal agency to seek and obtain approval from the...

388

Independent Oversight Review of Management of Safety Systems at the Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center and Associated Feedback and Improvement Processes, September 2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Management of Safety Systems at the Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center and Associated Feedback and Improvement Processes May 2011 February 2013 September 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose.................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2

389

Independent Oversight Review of Management of Safety Systems at the Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center and Associated Feedback and Improvement Processes, September 2013  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Management of Safety Systems at the Oak Ridge Transuranic Waste Processing Center and Associated Feedback and Improvement Processes May 2011 February 2013 September 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose.................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2

390

Federal Energy Consumption and Progress Made toward Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) tracks Federal agency energy consumption and progress toward achieving energy laws and requirements.

391

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

--------------------------- Chapter 6.5 (January 2011) 1 Competition Advocate Responsibilities [Reference: FAR 6.5, FAR 7 and DEAR 906.501] Overview This section discusses the competition advocate requirements and provides a Federal Procurement Data System-New Generation (FPDS-NG) coding assistance sheet and screen shots for the FPDS-NG Competition Report. Background FAR Part 6.5, -Competition Advocates,‖ implements section 20 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, which requires the head of each executive agency to designate an Agency Competition Advocate and Procuring Activity Advocates (hereafter referred to as Activity Competition Advocates). In accordance with DEAR 906.501, the Secretary of

392

Report: EM Management Analysis and Strategic Vision-Casting  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Management Analysis and Strategic Vision-Casting Management Analysis and Strategic Vision-Casting September 25, 2008 Submitted by the EMAB Strategic Vision-Casting Subcommittee Background: In the course of developing the Environmental Management Advisory Board's (EMAB) fiscal year (FY) 2008 review topics, EM leadership and Board members recognized a need to re-examine the program's strategy and vision for the future, in order to better position EM and continue its momentum for clean-up and closure. This endeavor will also ensure that the next administration and current stakeholders are aligned with EM's proposed priorities, funding requirements, and commitments for 2009 and beyond. Consequently, the Board formed a Strategic Vision-Casting Subcommittee that was charged with the assignment of reviewing EM's current and past missions and strategic visions to assess

393

Hospitality Management Hospitality Management  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of the global hospitality industry. Academic Offerings HOSPITALITY AND FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT MINOR HOSPITALITY AND FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT MINOR Students pursuing programs in other areas of study may choose a minor Lodging Management 3 HPM 309 Sports Arena Management 3 HPM 312* Cost Control in Food Services (Prereq

McConnell, Terry

394

BER Science Network Requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Network Network Requirements Report of the Biological and Environmental Research Network Requirements Workshop Conducted July 26 and 27, 2007 BER Science Network Requirements Workshop Biological and Environmental Research Program Office, DOE Office of Science Energy Sciences Network Bethesda, MD - July 26 and 27, 2007 ESnet is funded by the US Dept. of Energy, Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) program. Dan Hitchcock is the ESnet Program Manager. ESnet is operated by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, which is operated by the University of California for the US Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. This work was supported by the Directors of the Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Facilities Division, and the Office of Biological &

395

PHEV Engine Control and Energy Management Strategy | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Management Strategy PHEV Engine Control and Energy Management Strategy 2012 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...

396

Draft Revised Guidelines for Implementing Executive Order 11988, "Floodplain Management"  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Federal Emergency Management Agency published the draft “Revised Guidelines for Implementing Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management” for public review and comment on January 30, 2015.

397

Review Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 1, 2011 August 1, 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - July 2011 Review of Selected Elements of Emergency Management at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory July 15, 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Savannah River Site - July 2011 Review of Electrical System Configuration Management and Design Change Control at the Savannah River Site, Waste Solidification Building Project July 15, 2011 Independent Oversight Special Review, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC - July 2011 Special Review of the Suspect/Counterfeit Items Program at the Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC at the Oak Ridge Reservation June 22, 2011 Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Hanford Site - June 2011 Follow-up Review of the Hanford Site Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program

398

Coastal Facilities Review Act (Maryland) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facilities Review Act (Maryland) Facilities Review Act (Maryland) Coastal Facilities Review Act (Maryland) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Fuel Distributor Industrial Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Municipal/Public Utility Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Utility Program Info State Maryland Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Maryland Department of the Environment This Act aims to preserve Maryland's coastal areas and to balance competing demands for resources by requiring environmental impact evaluations to be conducted prior to the approval of the construction or operation of certain facilities. Such review complements the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, which establishes a comprehensive plan for the proper use and development of energy resources in coastal areas. This Act applies to

399

HQFMSP Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, Surveys and Reviews 7, Surveys and Reviews HQFMSP Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews October 2013 2013 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews This chapter covers the HQ Security Survey Program, which has two primary functions. First, survey team members assist HQ program elements in establishing, maintaining, and deactivating their LAs, VTRs, and TLAs. Second, the survey team conducts an annual assessment of how well security activities are being performed throughout HQ. Problems they identify must be corrected to ensure that that HQ security interests are being properly protected. This chapter is maintained by the HQ Security Survey Program Manager in HS-92.s'> There are also controls over some foreign travel performed by DOE employees and contractors. Controls and required actions

400

HQFMSP Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, Surveys and Reviews 7, Surveys and Reviews HQFMSP Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews October 2013 2013 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews This chapter covers the HQ Security Survey Program, which has two primary functions. First, survey team members assist HQ program elements in establishing, maintaining, and deactivating their LAs, VTRs, and TLAs. Second, the survey team conducts an annual assessment of how well security activities are being performed throughout HQ. Problems they identify must be corrected to ensure that that HQ security interests are being properly protected. This chapter is maintained by the HQ Security Survey Program Manager in HS-92.s'> There are also controls over some foreign travel performed by DOE employees and contractors. Controls and required actions

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Project Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Management Management Project Management Project Directors are responsible for the planning, programming, budgeting and acquisition of capital assets. One of the principal outcomes in exercising this responsibility is the delivery of projects on schedule, within budget, with the required performance capability, and compliant with quality, environmental, safety and health standards. These web pages identify the DOE requirements related to the acquisition of capital assets and present a common framework for implementing the requirements. Our intent is not to impose additional requirements, but rather place existing requirements in the proper context. The target audience for these pages includes Federal Project Directors, Program Managers, Acquisition Executives, and others involved in the DOE capital asset acquisition

402

Congressional Budget Review  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order outlines requirements and procedures for the preparation and submission of the Department of Energy (DOE) budget for Congressional Budget Review. Canceled by DOE O 130.1.

1992-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

403

NNSA's holds Stewardship Science Academic Programs Annual Review...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

NNSA's holds Stewardship Science Academic Programs Annual Review Symposium | National Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation...

404

Spent Nuclear Fuel Project document control and Records Management Program Description  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project document control and records management program, as defined within this document, is based on a broad spectrum of regulatory requirements, Department of Energy (DOE) and Project Hanford and SNF Project-specific direction and guidance. The SNF Project Execution Plan, HNF-3552, requires the control of documents and management of records under the auspices of configuration control, conduct of operations, training, quality assurance, work control, records management, data management, engineering and design control, operational readiness review, and project management and turnover. Implementation of the controls, systems, and processes necessary to ensure compliance with applicable requirements is facilitated through plans, directives, and procedures within the Project Hanford Management System (PHMS) and the SNF Project internal technical and administrative procedures systems. The documents cited within this document are those which directly establish or define the SNF Project document control and records management program. There are many peripheral documents that establish requirements and provide direction pertinent to managing specific types of documents that, for the sake of brevity and clarity, are not cited within this document.

MARTIN, B.M.

2000-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

405

Competition Requirements  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

- Chapter 5.2 (April 2008) - Chapter 5.2 (April 2008) Synopsizing Proposed Non-Competitive Contract Actions Citing the Authority of FAR 6.302-1 [Reference: FAR 5 and DEAR 905] Overview This section discusses publicizing sole source actions as part of the approval of a Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC) using the authority of FAR 6.302-1. Background The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984 requires that all acquisitions be made using full and open competition. Seven exceptions to using full and open competition are specifically identified in FAR Part 6. One exception permits contracting without full and open competition when the required supplies or services are available from only one responsible source (FAR 6.302-1). This exception is

406

School requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Cryogenics Show Cryogenics Show Length of time: 40-50 minutes Room preference: Gym or auditorium To help make a Cryogenics Show run smoothly, we ask the following: Make sure the presenter has exact directions to your school and any parking and delivery information. The Cryogenics Show should not be "directly" under any photo or ion type smoke detectors. The individual requesting the show is responsible for checking with the facility manager about the best location for the show. If the floor is not carpeted, everyone must be seated in chairs or bleachers. If you have scheduled multiple presentations, we request that we stay in the same room for all presentations. It is time consuming to move the set up from room to room. We would like 10-15 minutes between presentations if possible. Two presentations would be a maximum request.

407

School requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Charge! Electricity And Magnetism Charge! Electricity And Magnetism Length of time: 40-55 minutes Room preference: Single or double classroom or all-purpose room. (Make plans by e-mail directly with your volunteer presenter.) To help make a Charge! presentation run smoothly, we ask the following: Make sure the scientist has exact directions to your school and any parking and delivery information. Please review basic concepts with the students before the presentation. They will understand more if they have these concepts fresh in mind. The classroom presentations are intended to enhance your classroom curriculum. This presentation is designed for students in 2nd-8th grades. Please let the scientists know of any specific related learning objectives you wish to address. The presentation is intended for one or two classes. It is most

408

School requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Physics of Sports Physics of Sports Length of time: 45-60 minutes Room preference: Gymnasium, Auditorium or All-purpose room. Since this presentation utilizes sports equipment and student volunteers, a room that is large enough for some sports related activity and a hard surface floor is best. (Make plans by e-mail directly with your volunteer presenter.) To help make a Physics of Sports presentation run smoothly, we ask the following: Make sure the scientist has exact directions to your school and any parking and delivery information. Please review basic concepts with the students before the presentation. They will understand more if they have these concepts fresh in mind. The classroom presentations are intended to enhance your classroom curriculum. This presentation is designed for students in 4th-12th grades.

409

School requirements  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Space, Time and Einstein Space, Time and Einstein Length of time: 40-55 minutes Room preference: Single or double classroom, Auditorium or all-purpose room. Space, Time and Einstein is best presented in a room that can be darkened and lights turned off and on. (Make plans by e-mail directly with your volunteer presenter.) To help make a Space, Time and Einstein presentation run smoothly, we ask the following: Make sure the scientist has exact directions to your school and any parking and delivery information. Please review basic concepts with the students before the presentation. They will understand more if they have these concepts fresh in mind. These classroom presentations are intended to enhance your classroom curriculum. This presentation is designed for students in 7th-12th grades.

410

TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT (TOUR)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT (TOUR) Bachelor of Commerce Degree The tourism industry & conferences, adventure tourism, travel trade, and tourism services. The Tourism and Hospitality concentration integrates general management concepts with the professional knowledge that is required by the tourism

Calgary, University of

411

Contractor Human Resource Management Programs  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The purpose of this directive is to establish Department of Energy (DOE) responsibilities and requirements for the management and oversight of contractor Human Resource Management (HR) programs. Chg 1, 5-8-98; Chg 2, 11-22-09

1996-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

412

Contractor Human Resource Management Programs  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The purpose of this directive is to establish Department of Energy (DOE) responsibilities and requirements for the management and oversight of contractor Human Resource Management (HR) programs. Chg 1, 5-8-98; Chg 2, 11-22-09.

1996-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

413

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS: This Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA For Amendments to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

414

Peer Review Oct 2005  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 10/17/2006 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. Superconducting Flywheel Development Phil Johnson FESS Program Manager Boeing Phantom Works DOE Energy Storage Systems 2006 Peer Review Boeing Technology | Phantom Works Superconducting Flywheel Development Peer Review Oct 2006.ppt | 2 Copyright © 2004 Boeing. All rights reserved. 50kW / 5kWh Flywheel Energy Storage System Off-Grid Demo System Objective: *Design, build and deliver a flywheel energy storage system tailored for off- grid applications utilizing a High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) Bearing Goal: *Successfully integrate the FESS system into a demonstration site One of three deployment options for the demo system, shown in relation to

415

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report...

416

ORISE: Capabilities in Scientific Peer Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Related Link Best Practices in Peer Review Assure Quality, Value, Objectivity (PDF, 330KB) Journal of the National Grants Management Association Oak Ridge Institute for Science...

417

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report ...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

response to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review." peerreviewreport021507.pdf More Documents & Publications Energy...

418

Federal Energy Management Program: Metering  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Metering to Metering to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Metering on AddThis.com... Sustainable Buildings & Campuses Operations & Maintenance Federal Requirements Program Management Commissioning Metering Systems Approaches Process Computerized Maintenance Management Systems Maintenance Types Major Equipment Types Resources Contacts Greenhouse Gases Water Efficiency Data Center Energy Efficiency Industrial Facilities

419

Book Review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......Copyright 2003 Book Review Book Review Book Review Frank Land 1 1 Emeritus...Economics, UK 526 BOOK REVIEWS discusses some basic concepts...the programming language Standard ML: CML (Concurrrent ML), Facile and PLAN (Packet Language for Active......

Frank Land

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Peer Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Rulemaking Rulemaking Peer Review Report - Supporting Documentation Submitted Pursuant to the Office of Management and Budget's "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" U.S. Department of Energy March 2007 Table of Contents PROJECT ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................ 16 SLIDE PRESENTATIONS ON JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .................................................. 104 PEER REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM.................................................................. 201 PEER REVIEW AGENDA JUNE 28 & 29, 2005 .........................................................

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act,  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Energy Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 432: Federal Facility Management and Benchmarking Requirements on Delicious

422

Coastal Area Management Program (Alabama) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Coastal Area Management Program (Alabama) Coastal Area Management Program (Alabama) Coastal Area Management Program (Alabama) < Back Eligibility Commercial Construction Industrial Savings Category Water Buying & Making Electricity Program Info State Alabama Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Department of Environmental Management This program regulates coastal activities, permits required, discharges to coastal waters and siting, construction and operation of energy facilities. ADEM's Coastal Program rules include the review and permitting for the following types of activities when they are to occur within the Coastal Area: beach and dune construction projects, developments and subdivision of properties greater than five (5) acres in size, dredging and filling of state water bottoms and wetlands, the drilling and operation of groundwater

423

FTCP Senior Technical Safety Manager (STSM) Status Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

List of Senior Technical Safety Manager Positions, Base Requirements, Compensatory Measures and Qualification Status.

424

E-Print Network 3.0 - assurance requirements document Sample...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Approval Documentation Due Diligence (Formerly APA1) Quality Management and Assurance... documentation Full Abridged Not required Required Not required Decision to be...

425

Michael Gronceski Mission Concept Review (MCR),  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

on a plan to address the issues and concerns in the review board's report. d) Agreement exists on a plan review and the review board(s) have been resolved, or a timely plan exists to resolve the issues. gMichael Gronceski 1/31/2013 #12;#12; Mission Concept Review (MCR), System Requirements Review (SRR

Rhoads, James

426

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 September 2000 Transportation Emergency Management Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a transportation emergency management review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) in September 2000.

427

Performance Demonstration Program Management Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To demonstrate compliance with the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) waste characterization program, each testing and analytical facility performing waste characterization activities participates in the Performance Demonstration Program (PDP). The PDP serves as a quality control check against expected results and provides information about the quality of data generated in the characterization of waste destined for WIPP. Single blind audit samples are prepared and distributed by an independent organization to each of the facilities participating in the PDP. There are three elements within the PDP: analysis of simulated headspace gases, analysis of solids for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) constituents, and analysis for transuranic (TRU) radionuclides using nondestructive assay (NDA) techniques. Because the analysis for TRU radionuclides using NDA techniques involves both the counting of drums and standard waste boxes, four PDP plans are required to describe the activities of the three PDP elements. In accordance with these PDP plans, the reviewing and approving authority for PDP results and for the overall program is the CBFO PDP Appointee. The CBFO PDP Appointee is responsible for ensuring the implementation of each of these plans by concurring with the designation of the Program Coordinator and by providing technical oversight and coordination for the program. The Program Coordinator will designate the PDP Manager, who will coordinate the three elements of the PDP. The purpose of this management plan is to identify how the requirements applicable to the PDP are implemented during the management and coordination of PDP activities. The other participants in the program (organizations that perform site implementation and activities under CBFO contracts or interoffice work orders) are not covered under this management plan. Those activities are governed by the organization’s quality assurance (QA) program and procedures or as otherwise directed by CBFO.

Carlsbad Field Office

2005-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

Identity Management Market: Identity management market shifts - who's out there?  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Selecting identity management products requires investigation. The market has proven problematic to standardize, has drawn a disproportionate degree of governmental regulation, and there is no clear market leader.

Mike Neuenschwander

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

Plan - Data Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Plan Plan Data Management for Data Providers Click an arrow to follow the data management path of a data set from planning to curation. plan Overview plan Plan manage Manage archive Archive curation DAAC Curation Data Management Overview Plan Manage Archive DAAC Curation Related Links DAAC Help Best Practices PDF Workshops DataONE ESIP Data Management Plans NASA's Terrestrial Ecology Program now requires that each proposal include a Data Management Plan (DMP) of up to two pages. A DMP for a proposal is a brief document that outlines what you will do with your data during and after your research, to ensure your data will be safe, documented, and accessible now and in the future. A DMP - developed early and used throughout the research project - will increase research efficiency by making the data understandable and usable in the future and

430

Department of Energy Personal Property Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order sets forth requirements for personal property management and accountability. Admin Chg 1, dated 10-22-12.

2012-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

431

2012 CERTS R&M Peer Review - Summary: Evaluating the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy - Tim Mount  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy the Effects of Managing Controllable Demand and Distributed Energy Resources Locally on System Performance and Costs Project Lead: Tim Mount, Alejandro D. Dominguez-Garcia, Ray Zimmerman 1. Project Objective The objective of this project is to use the new multi-period version of the Cornell SuperOPF to analyze the system and economic effects of having high penetrations of renewable energy on a network and to determine effective ways to mitigate the inherent variability of these sources. With the new capabilities of the SuperOPF, it will now be possible to evaluate the effects of shifting demand from peak to off-peak periods. Previous research has shown that higher penetrations of renewables are associated with higher annual costs for conventional installed generating capacity ($/MW/Year) due to

432

Earned Value Management System (EVMS)  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides approaches for implementing the Earned Value Management System (EVMS) requirements of DOE O 413.3B. Cancels DOE G 413.3-10.

2012-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

433

Scientific and Technical Information Management  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order establishes requirements and responsibilities for managing DOE's scientific and technical information. Cancels DOE O 241.1. Canceled by DOE O 241.1B.

2003-10-14T23:59:59.000Z

434

Alternative Fuels Data Center: Petroleum Reduction Requirements  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Petroleum Reduction Petroleum Reduction Requirements to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Petroleum Reduction Requirements on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Petroleum Reduction Requirements on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Petroleum Reduction Requirements on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Petroleum Reduction Requirements on Delicious Rank Alternative Fuels Data Center: Petroleum Reduction Requirements on Digg Find More places to share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Petroleum Reduction Requirements on AddThis.com... More in this section... Federal State Advanced Search All Laws & Incentives Sorted by Type Petroleum Reduction Requirements The Wisconsin Department of Administration's fleet management policy

435

Review Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 15, 2013 April 15, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project - April 2013 Review of Radiation Protection Program Implementation at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project of the Idaho Site April 15, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - April 2013 Review of the Integrated Safety Management System Phase I Verification Review at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant April 11, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities - April 2013 Lessons Learned from the 2012 Targeted Reviews of Emergency Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at Select DOE/NNSA Nuclear Facilities March 12, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Idaho Site, March 2013 Review of the Facility Representative Program at the Idaho Site

436

Management of Nuclear Materials  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish requirements and procedures for the management of nuclear materials within the Department of Energy (DOE). Cancels DOE 5660.1A. Canceled by DOE O 410.2.

1994-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

437

Effectiveness Review Overview Theresa Triplett  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;10 Performing An Effectiveness Review · Review causal analysis report and/or the assessment report are not included in the effectiveness review · Team composition requires an independent party #12;5 What a single area of exposure. Note: A combination of methodologies may be appropriate #12;7 Performing

438

Human Factors Review Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

''Human Factors'' is concerned with the incorporation of human user considerations into a system in order to maximize human reliability and reduce errors. This Review Plan is intended to assist in the assessment of human factors conditions in existing DOE facilities. In addition to specifying assessment methodologies, the plan describes techniques for improving conditions which are found to not adequately support reliable human performance. The following topics are addressed: (1) selection of areas for review describes techniques for needs assessment to assist in selecting and prioritizing areas for review; (2) human factors engineering review is concerned with optimizing the interfaces between people and equipment and people and their work environment; (3) procedures review evaluates completeness and accuracy of procedures, as well as their usability and management; (4) organizational interface review is concerned with communication and coordination between all levels of an organization; and (5) training review evaluates training program criteria such as those involving: trainee selection, qualification of training staff, content and conduct of training, requalification training, and program management.

Paramore, B.; Peterson, L.R. (eds.)

1985-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Radioactive Waste Management Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual further describes the requirements and establishes specific responsibilities for implementing DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, for the management of DOE high-level waste, transuranic waste, low-level waste, and the radioactive component of mixed waste. Change 1 dated 6/19/01 removes the requirement that Headquarters is to be notified and the Office of Environment, Safety and Health consulted for exemptions for use of non-DOE treatment facilities. Certified 1-9-07.

1999-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

440

Risk Management Guide  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides a framework for identifying and managing key technical, schedule, and cost risks through applying the requirements of DOE O 413.3A, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, dated 7-28-06. Canceled by DOE G 413.3-7A, dated 1-12-11. Does not cancel other directives.

2008-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Information Collection Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Order sets forth DOE requirements and responsibilities for implementing the information collection management provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and the Office of Management and Budgets implementing regulation Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public, as contained in 5 CFR 1320. No cancellation.

2006-10-11T23:59:59.000Z

442

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT FOR SECRETARIAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL REGULATORY an Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area including a Regulatory Amendment to rescind regulations (� 675.22, paragraphs c,d,e) that allow

443

Management & Administration Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reports Management & Administration Reports October 17, 2014 Special Review: DOEIG-0923 Issues Pertaining to the Termination of Ms. Donna Busche, a Contractor Employee...

444

Environmental Management Performance Reports - Hanford Site  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Official Documents > Environmental Management Performance Reports Official Documents DOE - RL ContractsProcurements DOE-ORP ContractsProcurements AR-PIR CERCLA Five-Year Review...

445

Managing environmental information in the age of outsourcing.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As more data gathering, analysis, and tracking tasks are outsourced the need for multiple contractors and military personnel to input, update, access, store, and track Mormation is becoming critical to efficient functioning and managing of environmental projects and programs at military installations. This paper presents two case studies detailing the way two organizations--the Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) in Colorado, and the 611th Air Support Group (611 ASG) in Alaska--are managing complex data using web-based technology. RMA is involved in one of the largest environmental cleanup programs in the Department of Defense. As such, large volumes of environmental data and documents must be generates stored, and tracked. Often these documents are prepared by multiple contractors and are reviewed by several parties or groups. To manage environmental information and to ensure that it meets compliance requirements more efficiently, RMA has developed an electronic document tracking and distribution system. This system allows access to up-to-date information, including a detailed review of all pertinent regulatory and other requirements at RMA. The dynamic system includes milestones, review deadlines, submission deadlines, and other requirements for managing the environmental program. The 611 ASG manages more than 30 remote installations in Alaska, many of which are operated by contractor personnel. These installations contain hundreds of buildings that are constantly being modified because of exposure to harsh arctic climates; some of them have been determined to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. To meet regulatory requirements for cultural resources management as well as engineering requirements for upkeep of buildings, a database was developed to store and analyze building data. The database has a web-based interface that allows anyone with the correct access codes to input new data, modify existing data, or query the database using a number of standard reports. This system allows the 611 ASG to centrally manage its building information while also permitting installation contractors to update and use data through the Internet from their remote locations.

Perkins, S.; Smith, K.; Whorton, M.; Williams, G.

1999-03-08T23:59:59.000Z

446

Book review  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

This book belongs to the series 'Perspectives in Nanotechnology' of CRC Press. It is a scientific encyclopedic monograph and, at the same time, a practical guide on two overlapping, closely related, very promising, recently emerging and rapidly developing areas of science and technology: medical nanotechnology consisting of a variety of nanoscale technologies applied to medicine and biomedical engineering, and nanomedicine being a newly emerging area of medicine which was created on the basis of the achievements of the research of molecular processes at the cellular level. The book consists of three parts. Part I with the title 'Perspectives' has three short chapters. In chapter 1 the author presents the scientific basis of medical nanotechnology and nanomedicine and discusses their societal implications. The main content of chapter 2 is the brief history of nanomedicine and the milestones of medical nanotechnology. The research initiatives, important publications, organizations, scientific meetings on medical nanotechnology and nanomedicine are listed in chapter 3. Part II with the title 'Beginning of Medical Nanotechnology' can be considered as a comprehensive presentation of the status quo of the successfully performed applications of nanotechnology in medicine and biomedical engineering. It consists of six chapters. In chapter 4 the author presents the impacts of nanotechnology on medicine, the natural evolution from physics, chemistry and bioscience to nanomedicine and the architecture of medical nanotechnology and nanomedicine. The other five chapters of part II are five encyclopedic bibliographical reviews on the advances in five main topics of medical nanotechnology and nanomedicine. In chapter 5 'Medication: Nanoparticles for Imaging and Drug Delivery', after introducing general requirements for the use of nanoparticles, the author presents a review on nanoparticles for x-ray and tomography imaging as well as for the enhancement of magnetic resonance imaging, nanodots for quantum resonance effects, nanoparticles for enhancing IR, visible, UV, ultrasound and optoacoustic imaging, for targeted imaging and energy delivery, such as photothermal and photodynamic therapy. A major part of this chapter is a review on nanoparticles for drug delivery either by direct application of nanoparticles in therapy or by targeted drug delivery. Different examples of cellular nanomachinery targeted by nanodrug are presented. The materials for fabricating drug delivery nanosystems are reviewed: nanocrystal, albumin-based particles, colloids, emulsions, gels, nanodiamonds, fibers, nanotubes, dendrimer, polymer-based particles, polymer-conjugates, polymeric micelles, liposomes, nanocapsules, etc. The therapeutic applications of nanoparticles are also presented with the attention on cancer therapy. The content of chapter 6 'Intervention: Nanotechnology in Reconstructive Intervention and Surgery' is the presentation on the nanoengineered materials in surgical and restorative applications, the use of endoscopic microelectromechanical systems (MEMs) for bridging the gap between drugs and surgery, and robotic technology in surgery. Chapter 7 'Regeneration: Nanomaterials for Tissue Regeneration' is a review on the application of nanotechnology in tissue regeneration. After presenting on the biomaterials for tissue regeneration, the author reviews the application of nanotechnology in tissue engineering, bioactive scaffold-guided tissue regeneration, cellular signaling, cell transplants, stem cell-based therapies and tissue engineering, and nanoencapsulation of cells and tissues. The following topics are then reviewed: nanomaterials for nerve regeneration by means of tissue engineering, nanoengineered materials for brain regeneration, nanoengineered scaffolding with cells for central nervous system regeneration, and new developments in cell therapy accelerated by nanoscience and nanotechnology. Chapter 8 with the title 'Restoration: Nanotechnology in Tissue Replacements and Prosthetics' is a review on the materials which have been used for im

Nguyen Van Hieu

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......book-review BOOK REVIEWS Book Reviews R. W. K. Odoni FIELD...Springer, 1986) 174 BOOK REVIEWS article, or more accurately...title from them. The plan is to study, for a suitably...theory, ultrafilters BOOK REVIEWS 175 and ultraproducts...procedures and non-standard structures such as higher......

R. W. K. Odoni

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Argonne National Laboratory- East, Volume I, May 2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Secretary of Energy’s Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA) conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs and emergency management programs at the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) in April and May 2002. The inspection was performed as a joint effort by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations and the Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This volume discusses the results of the review of ANL ES&H programs. The results of the review of the ANL emergency management programs are discussed in Volume II of this report and the combined results are discussed in a summary report. As discussed in this report, some aspects of ISM are effectively implemented at ANL, including institutional roles and responsibilities, training and qualification programs, and processes for incorporating ES&H needs into the planning and budgeting processes. In addition, CH/AAO and ANL have been effective in establishing rigorous processes for reviewing experiment safety. However, performance weaknesses are evident in several areas, including work planning and control processes, radiation protection, and some aspects of management of the AGHCF (including nuclear safety requirements). Weaknesses in management systems, such as CH/AAO and ANL feedback and continuous improvement systems and requirements management systems, contribute to the observed performance deficiencies. Section 2 of this volume provides an overall discussion of the results of the review of the ANL ISM program, including positive aspects, findings, and other items requiring management attention. Section 3 provides OA’s conclusions regarding the overall effectiveness of CH and ANL management of the ES&H programs. Section 4 presents the ratings assigned as a result of this review. Appendix A provides supplemental information, including team member composition. Appendix B identifies the specific findings that require corrective actions and follow-up. Appendix C presents the results of the review of the guiding principles of ISM. Appendix D presents the results of the review of the CH and ANL feedback and continuous improvement processes. The results of the review of the application of the core functions of ISM at the selected ANL facilities are discussed in Appendix E.

449

Property Management | Department of Energy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Management Management Property Management Personal Property Management and Accountability for Headquarters Management Personal property management includes all functions necessary for the proper determination of need, source, acquisition, receipt, accountability, utilization, maintenance, rehabilitation, storage, distribution and disposal of property. Authorized Property Representatives Effective October 2, 2013: Authorized Property Pass Signers List and Accountable Property Representatives List Personal Property Guidance Personal property management requires a lifecycle approach to be effective. There are four major phases in the personal property lifecycle: acquisition, receipt, utilization, and disposal. Each phase has distinct processes and procedures associated with it to maintain proper stewardship

450

Independent Oversight Review, URS CH2M Oak Ridge - June 2013 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

URS CH2M Oak Ridge - June 2013 URS CH2M Oak Ridge - June 2013 Independent Oversight Review, URS CH2M Oak Ridge - June 2013 June 2013 Review of Oak Ridge Environmental Management Radiological Controls Activity Level Implementation The purpose of this set of facility specific Independent Oversight targeted reviews is to evaluate the flowdown of occupational radiation protection requirements, as expressed in facility RPPs, to work planning, control, and execution processes, such as radiological work authorizations, including radiological work permits (RWPs) and other technical work documents (TWDs). This targeted review was performed at Oak Ridge during the period of March 3-22, 2013. This report discusses the background, scope, methodology, results, and conclusions of the review, as well as items identified for

451

Methodology for assessing performance of waste management systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the methodology provided in this report is to select the optimal way to manage particular sets of waste streams from generation to disposal in a safe and cost-effective manner. The methodology described is designed to review the entire waste management system, assess its performance, ensure that the performance objectives are met, compare different LLW management alternatives, and select the optimal alternative. The methodology is based on decision analysis approach, in which costs and risk are considered for various LLW management alternatives, a comparison of costs, risks, and benefits is made, and an optimal system is selected which minimizes costs and risks and maximizes benefits. A ''zoom-lens'' approach is suggested, i.e., one begins by looking at gross features and gradually proceeds to more and more detail. Performance assessment requires certain information about the characteristics of the waste streams and about the various components of the waste management system. Waste acceptance criteria must be known for each component of the waste management system. Performance assessment for each component requires data about properties of the waste streams and operational and design characteristics of the processing or disposal components. 34 refs., 2 figs., 1 tab.

Meshkov, N.K.; Herzenberg, C.L.; Camasta, S.F.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

452

A review of selected energy-related data sets  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE`s Office of Planning and Assessment (OPA) performs crosscutting technical, policy, and environmental assessments of energy technologies and markets. To support these efforts, OPA is in the process of creating a data base management system (DBMS) that will include relevant data compiled from other sources. One of the first steps is a review of selected data sets that may be considered for inclusion in the DBMS. The review covered data sets in five categories: buildings-specific data, industry-specific data, transportation-specific data, utilities-specific data, and crosscutting/general data. Reviewed data sets covered a broad array of energy efficiency, renewable, and/or benchmark technologies. Most data sets reviewed in this report are sponsored by Federal government entities and major industry organizations. Additional data sets reviewed are sponsored by the states of California and New York and regional entities in the Pacific Northwest. Prior to full review, candidate data sets were screened for their utility to OPA. Screening criteria included requirements that a data set be particularly applicable to OPA`s data needs, documented, current, and obtainable. To fully implement its DBMS, OPA will need to expand the review to other data sources, and must carefully consider the implications of differing assumptions and methodologies when comparing data.

Nicholls, A.K.; Elliott, D.B.; Jones, M.L. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States); Hannifan, J.M.; Degroat, K.J.; Eichner, M.J.; King, J.E. [Meridian Corp., Alexandria, VA (United States)

1992-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

A review of selected energy-related data sets  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE's Office of Planning and Assessment (OPA) performs crosscutting technical, policy, and environmental assessments of energy technologies and markets. To support these efforts, OPA is in the process of creating a data base management system (DBMS) that will include relevant data compiled from other sources. One of the first steps is a review of selected data sets that may be considered for inclusion in the DBMS. The review covered data sets in five categories: buildings-specific data, industry-specific data, transportation-specific data, utilities-specific data, and crosscutting/general data. Reviewed data sets covered a broad array of energy efficiency, renewable, and/or benchmark technologies. Most data sets reviewed in this report are sponsored by Federal government entities and major industry organizations. Additional data sets reviewed are sponsored by the states of California and New York and regional entities in the Pacific Northwest. Prior to full review, candidate data sets were screened for their utility to OPA. Screening criteria included requirements that a data set be particularly applicable to OPA's data needs, documented, current, and obtainable. To fully implement its DBMS, OPA will need to expand the review to other data sources, and must carefully consider the implications of differing assumptions and methodologies when comparing data.

Nicholls, A.K.; Elliott, D.B.; Jones, M.L. (Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)); Hannifan, J.M.; Degroat, K.J.; Eichner, M.J.; King, J.E. (Meridian Corp., Alexandria, VA (United States))

1992-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Agent review phase one report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the findings for phase one of the agent review and discusses the review methods and results. The phase one review identified a short list of agent systems that would prove most useful in the service architecture of an information management, analysis, and retrieval system. Reviewers evaluated open-source and commercial multi-agent systems and scored them based upon viability, uniqueness, ease of development, ease of deployment, and ease of integration with other products. Based on these criteria, reviewers identified the ten most appropriate systems. The report also mentions several systems that reviewers deemed noteworthy for the ideas they implement, even if those systems are not the best choices for information management purposes.

Zubelewicz, Alex Tadeusz; Davis, Christopher Edward; Bauer, Travis LaDell

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

455

Internal Program Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Advanced Applications Research & Development (AARD) Internal Program Review 27-28 June 2013 Washington, DC Joe Eto Lawrence Berkeley National Lab DOE/OE Transmission Reliability Program 2 Management Review Topics  Project objective  Major technical accomplishments that will be completed this year  Deliverables and schedule for activities to be completed under FY13 funding  Risk factors affecting timely completion of planned activities as well as movement through RD&D cycle  Early thoughts on follow-on work that should be considered for funding in FY14 3 Management Review Issues  RD&D stage of the project: - Theoretical study-proof of concept - Modeling/simulation-using real data?

456

Can Florida's Legislative Standard of Review for Small-Scale Land Use Amendments Be Justified?  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to require the DCA to review the plan amendment if itstandard of review for all comprehensive plan amendments isstan- dard of review for a comprehensive plan amendment with

Appleman, Bernard R.

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

457

Book Reviews  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

...articles lucidly review the current comprehensive...efforts. the literature fairly completely...very scholarly review of the literature. R. Weil et...in the research literature. Thus Stewart's...practitioners review 32 subjects...

1975-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

458

2012 SG Peer Review - Real-Time Distribution Feed Performance Monitoring, Advisory Control, and Health Management System - James Stoupis, ABB Inc.  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Real-Time Distribution Feeder Performance Real-Time Distribution Feeder Performance Monitoring, Advisory Control, and Health Management System James Stoupis ABB Inc., US Corporate Research Center June 7, 2012 December 2008 Real-Time Distribution Feeder Performance Monitoring Objective Life-cycle Funding Summary ($K) Prior to FY 12 FY12, authorized FY13, requested Out-year(s) $200 k $1.1 M $1.3 M $400k Technical Scope To innovatively leverage advanced sensing, monitoring, and control technologies to enhance asset utilization and grid reliability Install state-of-the-art data collection, monitoring, and sensing equipment in distribution substations and on distribution feeders Develop new feeder monitoring, advisory control, and asset health applications deployed on current circuits, and future circuits with DERs

459

Radioactive Waste Management Manual  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Manual further describes the requirements and establishes specific responsibilities for implementing DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, for the management of DOE high-level waste, transuranic waste, low-level waste, and the radioactive component of mixed waste. The purpose of the Manual is to catalog those procedural requirements and existing practices that ensure that all DOE elements and contractors continue to manage DOE's radioactive waste in a manner that is protective of worker and public health and safety, and the environment. Does not cancel other directives.

1999-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

460

Draft Final Phase II Report: Review of Life Cycle and Technology Applications of the Office of Environmental Managements Tank  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

A1-1 A1-1 APPENDIX 1 Charge Summary Issue Suggested Activities Expected Output/ Work Product Notes Charge 1 Modeling for Life-Cycle Analysis This task entails reviewing the modeling approaches for determining tank waste remediation life-cycle costs at both SRS and Hanford. This includes evaluating assumptions in system plans for completing tank waste missions at Hanford and SRS, as well as the rigor of the models for identifying activities and costs through the end of each site's program. Recommendation(s) At Hanford, LAW vitrification capital and operating costs are potentially substantially greater than competing technologies. A second LAW vitrification plant is currently part of the baseline in order to treat the balance of the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Distribution Integrity Management Plant (DIMP)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the distribution integrity management plan (Plan) for the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Natural Gas Distribution System. This Plan meets the requirements of 49 CFR Part 192, Subpart P Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) for the LANL Natural Gas Distribution System. This Plan was developed by reviewing records and interviewing LANL personnel. The records consist of the design, construction, operation and maintenance for the LANL Natural Gas Distribution System. The records system for the LANL Natural Gas Distribution System is limited, so the majority of information is based on the judgment of LANL employees; the maintenance crew, the Corrosion Specialist and the Utilities and Infrastructure (UI) Civil Team Leader. The records used in this report are: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) 7100.1-1, Report of Main and Service Line Inspection, Natural Gas Leak Survey, Gas Leak Response Report, Gas Leak and Repair Report, and Pipe-to-Soil Recordings. The specific elements of knowledge of the infrastructure used to evaluate each threat and prioritize risks are listed in Sections 6 and 7, Threat Evaluation and Risk Prioritization respectively. This Plan addresses additional information needed and a method for gaining that data over time through normal activities. The processes used for the initial assessment of Threat Evaluation and Risk Prioritization are the methods found in the Simple, Handy Risk-based Integrity Management Plan (SHRIMP{trademark}) software package developed by the American Pipeline and Gas Agency (APGA) Security and Integrity Foundation (SIF). SHRIMP{trademark} uses an index model developed by the consultants and advisors of the SIF. Threat assessment is performed using questions developed by the Gas Piping Technology Company (GPTC) as modified and added to by the SHRIMP{trademark} advisors. This Plan is required to be reviewed every 5 years to be continually refined and improved. Records for all piping system installed after the effective date of this Plan will be captured and retained in the UI records documentation system. Primary Utility Asbuilts are maintained by Utilities Mapping (UMAP) and additional records are maintained on the N drive. Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) are stored on the N drive under configuration management and kept up by Utilities and Infrastructure Division Office (UI-DO). Records include, at a minimum, the location where new piping and appurtenances are installed and the material of which they are constructed.

Gonzales, Jerome F. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

462

Natural Resource Management Plan for Brookhaven National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This comprehensive Natural Resource Management Plan (NRMP) for Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) was built on the successful foundation of the Wildlife Management Plan for BNL, which it replaces. This update to the 2003 plan continues to build on successes and efforts to better understand the ecosystems and natural resources found on the BNL site. The plan establishes the basis for managing the varied natural resources located on the 5,265 acre BNL site, setting goals and actions to achieve those goals. The planning of this document is based on the knowledge and expertise gained over the past 10 years by the Natural Resources management staff at BNL in concert with local natural resource agencies including the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Long Island Pine Barrens Joint Planning and Policy Commission, The Nature Conservancy, and others. The development of this plan is an attempt at sound ecological management that not only benefits BNL's ecosystems but also benefits the greater Pine Barrens habitats in which BNL is situated. This plan applies equally to the Upton Ecological and Research Reserve (Upton Reserve). Any difference in management between the larger BNL area and the Upton Reserve are noted in the text. The purpose of the Natural Resource Management Plan (NRMP) is to provide management guidance, promote stewardship of the natural resources found at BNL, and to sustainably integrate their protection with pursuit of the Laboratory's mission. The philosophy or guiding principles of the NRMP are stewardship, sustainability, adaptive ecosystem management, compliance, integration with other plans and requirements, and the incorporation of community involvement, where applicable. The NRMP is periodically reviewed and updated, typically every five years. This review and update was delayed to develop documents associated with a new third party facility, the Long Island Solar Farm. This two hundred acre facility will result in significant changes to this plan warranting the delay. The body of this plan establishes the management goals and actions necessary for managing the natural resources at BNL in a sustainable manner. The appendices provide specific management requirements for threatened and endangered amphibians and fish (Appendices A and B, respectively), and lists of actions in tabular format - including completed items as well as ongoing and new action items (Appendices C and D, respectively).

green, T.

2011-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

463

BER Science Network Requirements  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) is the primary provider of network connectivity for the US Department of Energy Office of Science, the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States. In support of the Office of Science programs, ESnet regularly updates and refreshes its understanding of the networking requirements of the instruments, facilities, scientists, and science programs that it serves. This focus has helped ESnet to be a highly successful enabler of scientific discovery for over 20 years. In April 2010 ESnet and the Office of Biological and Environmental Research, of the DOE Office of Science, organized a workshop to characterize the networking requirements of the science programs funded by BER. The requirements identified at the workshop are summarized and described in more detail in the case studies and the Findings section. A number of common themes emerged from the case studies and workshop discussions. One is that BER science, like many other disciplines, is becoming more and more distributed and collaborative in nature. Another common theme is that data set sizes are exploding. Climate Science in particular is on the verge of needing to manage exabytes of data, and Genomics is on the verge of a huge paradigm shift in the number of sites with sequencers and the amount of sequencer data being generated.

Dart, Eli; Tierney, Brian

2010-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Assessment of Project Management Experience  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assessment of Project Management Experience PMCDP for CEG Competency 1.12.2 Assessment of Project Management Experience PMCDP for CEG Competency 1.12.2 Applicant Name: Applicant Supervisor: Date (mm/dd/yyyy): Directions: Step 1: Use this template to show project management experience for CEG competency 1.12.2. Rate your experience (0 - 5) in the following project management related activities using the scale below. Step 2: Sign the completed form and have your supervisor review and sign it. Step 3: Once approved by your supervisor, submit the form as part of your Level I certification package. Note: Project management experience is distinguished from FPD experience and applies to general project management activities and experience. Positions that do not count towards experience in project management include: program manager, property manager, health, safety and security (HSS) positions, and

465

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of the integrated safety management system (ISMS) established and implemented by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,

466

Deere & Company Energy Management Program  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

An overview of the Deere & Company Energy Management Program is discussed. A review is made of seven key elements which have contributed to the success of the program. Installed projects and established programs are identified and discussed...

Darby, D. F.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

Assign Ad Hoc Reviewer Step-By-Step Procedure  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Proposal Management Reviewer Assign Ad Hoc Reviewer Step-By-Step Procedure Last updated: 12/19/2013 1 of 2 http://eresearch.umich.edu Assign an Ad Hoc Reviewer Based on the information provided as a Reviewer. Anyone who has an account in the system can be added as an Ad Hoc Reviewer. Who Can Assign Ad Hoc

Shyy, Wei

468

Peer Review Summary Document (10/29/2013)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Peer Review Summary Document (10/29/2013) Peer Review Plan http://www.usgs.gov/peer_review.S. Geological Survey) and Douglas Carter (University of Florida, Gainesville). Peer Reviewers Expertise and Credentials Peer Reviewer #1 ­ Ph.D. in Environmental Science and Management. Expertise in environmental

Torgersen, Christian

469

Mobile Technology Management  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes requirements, assigns responsibilities, and provides guidance for federal mobile technology management and employee use of both government furnished and personally-owned mobile devices within DOE and NNSA. Establishes requirements for use of User Agreements to govern mobile devices used for official duties. Does not cancel other directives.

2014-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

470

Environmental management of water projects  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This book is divided in three parts and contains the following: PART I: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS. Environmental conditions for water resource projects. Characteristics of some large scale reservoirs. Biological parameters of the TVA Eurasian watermilfoil management program. Ecological parameters influencing aquatic plant growth. Biological parameters influencing growth and reproduction of hydrilla. PART II: EVALUATION OF SELECTED AQUATIC HERBICIDES. Technical review of the factors affecting 2,4-D for aquatic use. Technical review of the factors affecting endothall for aquatic use. Technical review of factors affecting diquat for aquatic use. Technical review of the factors affecting use of dicamba. Technical review of the factors affecting aquatic use of dichlobenil. PART III: EVALUATION OF VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS. Strategies for aquatic vegetation management. (A) conversion of factors for U.S. and metric units. (B) Glossary of terms. Index.

Gangstad, E.O.; Stanley, R.A.

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

Science Review Review Definitions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

IPTS Proposal Review Ratings IPTS Proposal Review Ratings 5 Extraordinary The proposal involves cutting-edge research of great scientific importance. Proposed research will significantly advance knowledge in a specific field or scientific discipline. The characteristics of the SNS and/or HFIR are essential to the success of the proposed work. I believe this proposal must be supported with the highest priority. 4.5 Excellent to Extraordinary -- 4 Excellent The proposed research is of high quality and has potential for making an important contribution to a specific field or scientific discipline. The work is innovative and is likely to be published in a leading scientific journal. The use of SNS and/or HFIR is highly desirable for the success of the proposed work. I strongly recommend that this proposal

472

Integration plan required by performance agreement SM 7.2.1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. and its major subcontractors are in agreement that environmental monitoring performed under the Project Hanford Management Contract is to be done in accordance with a single, integrated program. The purpose of this Integration Plan for Environmental Monitoring is to document the policies, systems, and processes being put in place to meet one key objective: manage and integrate a technically competent, multi-media ambient environmental monitoring program, in an efficient, cost effective manner. Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. and its major subcontractors also commit to conducting business in a manner consistent with the International Standards Organization 14000 Environmental Management System concepts. Because the integration of sitewide groundwater monitoring activities is managed by the Environmental Restoration Contractor, groundwater monitoring it is outside the scope of this document. Therefore, for the purpose of this Integration Plan for Environmental Monitoring, the Integrated Environmental Monitoring Program is defined as applicable to all environmental media except groundwater. This document provides recommendations on future activities to better integrate the overall environmental monitoring program, with emphasis on the near-field program. In addition, included is the Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. team review of the environmental monitoring activities on the Hanford Site, with concurrence of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Bechtel Hanford, Inc. (The narrative provided later in the Discussion Section describes the review and consideration given to each topic.) This document was developed to meet the requirements of the Project Hanford Management Contract performance agreement (SM7.2) and the tenets of the U.S. Department of Energy's Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Planning Process. This Plan is prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Environmental Assurance, Permits, and Policy Division to complete the requirements specified in the Performance Expectation 7.2.1, within the SM7 Environmental, Safety, and Health section of the Project Hanford Management Contract.

Diediker, L.P.

1997-03-28T23:59:59.000Z

473

External Technical Review Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

External Technical Review Report External Technical Review Report March 2010 U U . . S S . . D D e e p p a a r r t t m m e e n n t t o o f f E E n n e e r r g g y y O O f f f f i i c c e e o o f f E E n n v v i i r r o o n n m m e e n n t t a a l l M M a a n n a a g g e e m m e e n n t t External Technical Review (ETR) Process Guide September 2008 U.S. DOE Office of Environmental Management September 2008 External Technical Review Process Guide Page 2 of 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose of Process ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Background .........................................................................................................................

474

Wildland Fire Management Plan for Brookhaven National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Wildland Fire Management Plan (FMP) for Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) updates the 2003 plan incorporating changes necessary to comply with DOE Order 450.1 and DOE P 450.4, Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy and Program Review; Wildland and Prescribed Fire Management Policy and implementation Procedures Reference Guide. This current plan incorporates changes since the original draft of the FMP that result from new policies on the national level. This update also removes references and dependence on the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Department of the Interior, fully transitioning Wildland Fire Management responsibilities to BNL. The Department of Energy policy for managing wildland fires requires that all areas, managed by the DOE and/or its various contractors, that can sustain fire must have a FMP that details fire management guidelines for operational procedures associated with wild fire, operational, and prescribed fires. Fire management plans provide guidance on fire preparedness, fire prevention, wildfire suppression, and the use of controlled, 'prescribed' fires and mechanical means to control the amount of available combustible material. Values reflected in the BNL Wildland FMP include protecting life and public safety; Lab properties, structures and improvements; cultural and historical sites; neighboring private and public properties; and endangered, threatened, and species of concern. Other values supported by the plan include the enhancement of fire-dependent ecosystems at BNL. This FMP will be reviewed periodically to ensure the fire program advances and evolves with the missions of the DOE and BNL. This Fire Management Plan is presented in a format that coverers all aspects specified by DOE guidance documents which are based on the national template for fire management plans adopted under the National Fire Plan. The DOE is one of the signatory agencies on the National Fire Plan. This FMP is to be used and implemented for the entire BNL site including the Upton Reserve and has been reviewed by, The Nature Conservancy, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Forest Rangers, and DOE, as well as appropriate BNL emergency services personnel. The BNL Fire Department is the lead on wildfire suppression. However, the BNL Natural Resource Manager will be assigned to all wildland fires as technical resource advisor.

Green,T.

2009-10-23T23:59:59.000Z

475

DRAFT for Secretarial Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT for Secretarial Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ INITIAL REGULATORY Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/RIR/IRFA) evaluates FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS For an Amendment to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish of the Bering Sea

476

Best Management Practice #4: Water-Efficient Landscaping | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

4: Water-Efficient Landscaping Best Management Practice 4: Water-Efficient Landscaping Best Management Practice 4: Water-Efficient Landscaping Traditional landscapes require...

477

A review of remote sensing methods for biomass feedstock production  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Monitoring and maximization of bioenergy yield from biomass feedstock has recently become a critically important goal for researchers. Remote sensing represents a potential method to monitor and estimate biomass so as to increase biomass feedstock production from energy crops. This paper reviews the biophysical properties of biomass and remote sensing methods for monitoring energy crops for site-specific management. While several research studies have addressed the agronomic dimensions of this approach, more research is required on perennial energy crops in order to maximize the yield of biomass feedstock. Assessment of established methods could lead to a new strategy to monitor energy crops for the adoption of site-specific management in biomass feedstock production. In this article, satellite, aerial and ground-based remote sensing’s were reviewed and focused on the spatial and temporal resolutions of imagery to adopt for site-specific management. We have concluded that the biomass yield prediction, the ground-based sensing is the most suitable to establish the calibration model and reference for aerial and satellite remote sensing. The aerial and satellite remote sensing are required for wide converge of planning and policy implementations of biomass feedstock production systems.

T. Ahamed; L. Tian; Y. Zhang; K.C. Ting

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

Surveillance Guide - CMS 3.1 Configuration Management Implementation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION 1.0 Objective The objective of this surveillance is to verify implementation of configuration management requirements. These surveillance activities provide a basis for evaluating the effectiveness of the contractor's program for implementation and control of configuration management and for establishing compliance with DOE requirements. References 2.1 DOE 430.1, Life Cycle Project Management 2.2 DOE-STD-1073-93, Guide for Operational Configuration Management 3.0 Requirements Implemented This surveillance is conducted to implement requirements of the Functions, Responsiblities and Authorities Manual (FRAM), Section 2, Configuration Management, FRAM #s 3 and 4. These requirements are

479

Environmental Review and the Design Build Process  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

an environmental management plan and provide training to workers · Required to host open Environmental Issues · First Wme MnDOT used an internal environmental compliance manager County Key Environmental Issues · In water project

Minnesota, University of

480

Energy Management Guidance | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Guidance Guidance Energy Management Guidance October 8, 2013 - 1:53pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides guidance on Federal laws and regulations related to energy management. General Guidance for Facilities Overview of Federal Energy Management Policy and Mandates: Guidance document outlining Federal energy management goals and requirements for Federal energy managers. Sustainability Requirement Crosswalk: Crosswalk of sustainability and energy goals and targets within executive orders and other statutes. Guidelines Establishing Criteria for Excluding Buildings from the Energy Performance Requirements of Section 543 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act as Amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005): Guidelines that established criteria for exclusions from the energy

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "manager review required" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Wind Program Peer Reviews | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Peer Reviews Wind Program Peer Reviews All programs within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) are required to undertake...

482

Standard Review Plan (SRP) Modules | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Quality Assurance » Standard Quality Assurance » Standard Review Plan (SRP) Modules Standard Review Plan (SRP) Modules Standard Review Plan - Critical Decision Handbook Overview Project Management Project Execution Plan Review Module (RM) Risk Management RM Integrated Project Team RM Earned Value Management System RM Acquisition Strategy RM Decommissioning Plan RM Site Transition Guidance Engineering and Design Conceptual Design RM Preliminary Design RM Final Design RM Construction Readiness RM Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan RM Readiness Review RM Seismic Design Expectations Report Technology Readiness Assessment Report External Technical Review Report Preparation for Facility Operations RM Safety Safety Design Strategy RM Conceptual Safety Design RM Preliminary Safety Design RM Facility Disposition Safety Strategy RM

483

Automotive Li-ion Battery Cooling Requirements | Department of...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Automotive Li-ion Battery Cooling Requirements Presents thermal management of lithium-ion battery packs for electric vehicles cunningham.pdf More Documents & Publications...

484

Review Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 4, 2009 June 4, 2009 Independent Oversight Focus Area Review, DOE Nuclear Facilities - June 2009 Review of Safety Component Procurement at DOE Nuclear Facilities April 30, 2009 Independent Oversight Inspection, Sandia National Laboratories - May 2009 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Sandia Site Office and Sandia National Laboratories April 6, 2009 Independent Oversight Follow-up Review, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - April 2009 Review of Nuclear Safety Programs at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory March 31, 2009 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - April 2009 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February 26, 2009 Independent Oversight Inspection, Hanford Site - February 2009

485

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Water Efficiency Best Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Water Efficiency Best Management Practices Water Efficiency Best Management Practices Water Sense at Work Logo for the EPA WaterSense The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency developed WaterSense at Work, a compilation of water-efficiency best management practices (BMPs), to help commercial and institutional facilities understand and manage water use, help facilities establish effective water-management programs, and identify projects and practices that reduce facility water use. FEMP originally developed Federal Water Efficiency Best Management Practices (BMPs) in response to Executive Order (E.O.) 13123 requirements, which required Federal agencies to reduce water use through cost-effective water efficiency improvements. E.O. 13423 supersedes E.O. 13123. To account for the superseded requirement changes, water use patterns, and advancing technologies, the Environmental Protection Agency's WaterSense Office updated the original BMPs.

486

Document Reviews | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Document Reviews Document Reviews Document Reviews The Office of Document Reviews, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security information and document declassification efforts promote the release of information needed by an informed citizenry to understand and oversee the actions of its Government. To meet our mission requirements, the Office of Document Reviews: Conducts pre-publication reviews of documents generated in classified subject areas at Headquarters that are to be released to the public. Conducts document reviews for other HSS and Headquarters organizations to identify classified and controlled unclassified information. Reviews classified documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act for the Department and denies the release of the document in total or provides a redacted copy for release to the requester.

487

Peer Review of Standards Rulemaking  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CHARGE CHARGE The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted the peer reviews in accordance with the requirements outlined in Bulletin from OMB (Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf). The selection of reviewers, including consideration of expertise, panel balance, conflicts of interest, and independence; employment of the peer review mechanisms (e.g., letter reviews, panels, etc.); and maintenance of transparency of the review process were in compliance with OMB guidance. DOE assembled a panel of experts to review the analysis used in the standards rulemaking process. The peer review panel consisted of seven reviewers DOE determined to be qualified to evaluate the assigned group of analyses, in accordance with the Bulletin. Each group of analyses displayed some technical diversity. Therefore, in