Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Subject: DOE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS DOE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS (Title Transfer, Loan, and Abandonment) References: Atomic Energy Act Sections 161g and 161j., Title 42 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) sections 2201g, and 22201j 42 U.S.C 16312 (Public Law 109-58, title IX, section 972, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 899), 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 102-36.380-395, Federal Management Regulation (FMR) DOE Order 580.1, Department of Energy Personal Property Program 4.c(3) DOE Guide 580.1-1, Department of Energy Personal Property Management Guide Chapter 11.8 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does This AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded, or canceled. Guidance in this Acquisition Letter shall

2

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18,...

3

DOE Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Management Environmental Management Project and Contract Management Improvement Timeline Improving DOE contract and project management is a top priority of the Department's senior management and entire organization. The DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) has put in place a "Roadmap" for Journey to Excellence that sets specific performance expectations for continuous improvements in contract and project management. Following are some highlights of EM's improvement actions over the past five years. In 2006, the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) began a study of EM, which included acquisition and project management among its key focus areas. The resultant report from the study,

4

DOE Releases Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Risk Management...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

DOE Releases Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process (RMP) Guideline DOE Releases Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process (RMP) Guideline...

5

DOE Challenge Home Recommended Quality Management Provisions...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Quality Management Provisions. qm6-14-13.pdf More Documents & Publications Version Tracking Document for DOE Challenge Homes, National Program Requirements (Rev. 03) DOE...

6

DOE Forms Management FAQ's | Department of Energy  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

an existing form? The DOE Forms Management Program (OCIO, Office of IT Planning, Architecture and E-Government) provides assistance to DOE HQ and field elements with forms...

7

Integrated Safety Management Policy - DOE Directives, Delegations...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

P 450.4A, Integrated Safety Management Policy by David Weitzman Functional areas: Integrated Safety Management, Safety The policy establishes DOE's expectation for safety,...

8

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Isolation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant April 20, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Bill Taylor Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center (803) 952-8564 Deb Gill U.S. DOE Carlsbad Field Office (575) 234-7270 CARLSBAD, N.M. - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC (members comprised of URS Energy & Construction, Inc., of Boise, Idaho, and Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Group, Inc., of Lynchburg, Virginia, and Major Subcontractor, AREVA Federal Services LLC, of Bethesda, Maryland) has been awarded a $1.3 billion contract for management and operating (M&O) at DOE's Waste

9

Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To define the program for the management of cost-effective maintenance of Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities. Guidance for compliance with this Order is contained in DOE G 433.1-1, Nuclear Facility Maintenance Management Program Guide for use with DOE O 433.1, which references Federal regulations, DOE directives, and industry best practices using a graded approach to clarify requirements and guidance for maintaining DOE-owned Government property. (Cancels DOE 4330.4B, Chapter II, Maintenance Management Program, dated 2-10-94.) Cancels DOE 4330.4B (in part). Canceled by DOE O 433.1A.

2001-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve DOE Awards Management and Operating Contract for DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve September 18, 2013 - 5:11pm Addthis WASHINGON, D. C. - After conducting a rigorous competitive selection process, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations, LLC (team includes members comprised of Parent Company Fluor Federal Services, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia and major subcontractors MRIGlobal of Kansas City, Missouri; Booz Allen Hamilton of Mclean, Virginia; and ASRC Petroleum Operations and Maintenance of Anchorage, Alaska) has been awarded a management and operating contract valued at $1.46 billion to run DOE's Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)

11

DOE - Office of Legacy Management  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Mound Site Five-Year Review Survey Mound Site Five-Year Review Survey Section 121 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), requires that remedial actions which result in any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site be subject to a five-year review. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently conducting the third five-year review at the Mound, Ohio, Site. The purpose of a five-year review is to ensure that the remedies that were implemented at the site continue to protect human health and the environment. Community involvement is an integral part of the Mound Site and the CERCLA five-year review process. DOE invites your input or comments about the

12

DOE - Office of Legacy Management  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Weldon Spring Site Five-Year Review Survey Weldon Spring Site Five-Year Review Survey Community involvement is considered an integral part of the Weldon Spring Site and the five-year review process. Section 121 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), requires that remedial actions which result in any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site be subject to a five-year review. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is currently conducting the fourth five-year review at the Weldon Spring Site. The purpose of a five-year review is to ensure that the remedy that was implemented to clean up the site continues to protect human health and the environment.

13

Negotiating equity for management of DOE wastes  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

One important factor frustrating optimal management of Department of Energy (DOE)-complex wastes is the inability to use licensed and permitted facilities systematically. Achieving the goal of optimal use of DOE`s waste management facilities is politically problematic for two reasons. First, no locale wants to bear a disproportionate burden from DOE wastes. Second, the burden imposed by additional wastes transported from one site to another is difficult to characterize. To develop a viable framework for equitably distributing these burdens while achieving efficient use of all DOE waste management facilities, several implementation and equity issues must be addressed and resolved. This paper discusses stakeholder and equity issues and proposes a framework for joint research and action that could facilitate equity negotiations among stakeholder and move toward a more optimal use of DOE`s waste management capabilities.

Carnes, S.A.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

14

DOE Names Oak Ridge Cleanup Manager  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Oak Ridge, Tenn. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today the selection of Sue Cange as the manager of the Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (EM). Previously, Cange served as the acting manager of EMs Oak Ridge Office since May 2014, and she has served as the deputy manager since March 2011.

15

DOE Fellows Join Waste Management Conference | Department of...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

DOE Fellows Join Waste Management Conference DOE Fellows Join Waste Management Conference March 31, 2014 - 12:00pm Addthis DOE Fellows gather with EM Lead Foreign Affairs...

16

DOE Manual - Advisory Committee Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MANUAL MANUAL DOE M 515.1-1 Approved: 10-22-07 ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Management AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: www.directives.doe.gov Office of Management i DOE M 515.1-1 10-22-07 ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1. PURPOSE. This Manual supplements the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.), Appendix 2, as amended, and the General Services Administration's (GSA's) final rule "Federal Advisory Committee Management" Title 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 102-3, which establishes the policies and minimum requirements for Federal agencies to manage and administer advisory committees. The Manual provides detailed Department of Energy (DOE or Department)

17

DOE Competency Management Program | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Competency Management Program DOE Competency Management Program DOE Competency Management Program The DOE faces a talent challenge derived from a number of factors including a dynamic operating environment, an anticipated wave of retirements from the workforce, and a projected shortage of workers with needed skills. The Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO) is charged with leading the effort to address the talent challenge. The strategic identification, development and use of competencies are key enablers "for strategically aligning the agency's workforce to its missions through effective management of human capital policies and programs." Competency-centric Learning and Development facilitates the selection, development, training, and management of a highly skilled, productive, and diverse workforce.

18

DOE - Office of Legacy Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Services Calibration Facilities Ecosystem Management Team Environmental Justice Environmental Management System Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance Post-Closure Benefits Property Records Management Stakeholder Relations Sites Considered Sites LM Sites Sites Pending Transfer to LM Programmatic Framework Mission News About Us LM Sites Select a Site Acid/Pueblo Canyon Adrian Site Albany Site Aliquippa Site Ambrosia Lake Site Amchitka Site Ashtabula Site Bayo Canyon Site Berkeley Site Beverly Site Bluewater Site BONUS Site Buffalo Site Burrell Site Canonsburg Site CEER Sites Chariot Site Chicago North Site Chicago South Site Chupadera Mesa Site CNTA Site Colonie Site Columbus Sites Columbus

19

DOE Oak Ridge Operations managers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Oak Ridge Operations managers As the last few articles have shown, the period immediately following the end of World War II was one of constant and continuing change for Oak Ridge....

20

Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Order defines the safety management program required by 10 CFR 830.204(b)(5) for maintenance and the reliable performance of Structures, Systems and Components (SSCs) that are part of the safety basis required by 10 CFR 830.202.1 at hazard category 1, 2 and 3 Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 433.1. Canceled by DOE O 433.1B.

2007-02-13T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order defines the safety management program required by 10 CFR 830.204(b)(5) for maintenance and the reliable performance of structures, systems and components that are part of the safety basis required by 10 CFR 830.202 at hazard category 1, 2 and 3 DOE nuclear facilities. Cancels DOE O 433.1A. Admin Chg 1, dated 3-12-2013, cancels DOE O 433.1B.

2010-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

22

Agenda - DOE Information Management Conference 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Monday - Risk Management Monday - Risk Management Risk Management 2:00-2:15 p.m. Welcome and Summit Overview Gil Vega, Chief Information Security Officer, U.S. Department of Energy Trinity Ballroom 4 2:00-5:00 p.m. OCIO Risk Management Summit Part II Diving Deep: Processes and Lessons Learned from Risk Management Implementation The OCIO is pleased to announce the Risk Management Summit, Part II at the 2012 Information Management Conference. This summit will begin with opening remarks from Alan Paller, Director of Research, SANS Institute, on the state of implementing risk-based management programs across the Federal government. Mr. Paller will also facilitate a panel of DOE site representatives to discuss "Diving Deep: Processes and Lessons Learned from Risk Management Implementation."

23

Project Management Guide for DOE appraisals  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This guide defines a process to provide exemplary support to a DOE assessment team and highlights ``lessons learned`` from the first TSA of the Kansas City Plant which was performed April 21--April 30, 1992. DOE currently plans to conduct TSAs annually at the KCD. This guide can be used to prepare for future Tiger Team Reviews, TSAS, or ES&H Progress Assessments. The guide will be modified periodically to reflect improvements in the appraisal management process as the DOE appraisal process evolves. The process, or portions thereof, described in this manual is expected to be applicable to managing a Conduct of Operations Assessment.

Bendure, A.O. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Bowers, J.L.; Daniel, V.R.; Renfrow, R.M. [Allied-Signal Aerospace Co., Kansas City, MO (United States). Kansas City Div.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

24

Project Management Guide for DOE appraisals  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This guide defines a process to provide exemplary support to a DOE assessment team and highlights lessons learned'' from the first TSA of the Kansas City Plant which was performed April 21--April 30, 1992. DOE currently plans to conduct TSAs annually at the KCD. This guide can be used to prepare for future Tiger Team Reviews, TSAS, or ES H Progress Assessments. The guide will be modified periodically to reflect improvements in the appraisal management process as the DOE appraisal process evolves. The process, or portions thereof, described in this manual is expected to be applicable to managing a Conduct of Operations Assessment.

Bendure, A.O. (Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States)); Bowers, J.L.; Daniel, V.R.; Renfrow, R.M. (Allied-Signal Aerospace Co., Kansas City, MO (United States). Kansas City Div.)

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

25

DOE Acquisition and Project Management (APM) Glossary of Terms...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Acquisition and Project Management (APM) Glossary of Terms Handbook FINAL VERSION 9-30-2014 DOE Acquisition and Project Management (APM) Glossary of Terms Handbook FINAL...

26

DOE Chief Learning Officer's and DVU Program Manager's Birthday...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chief Learning Officer's and DVU Program Manager's Birthday memos DOE Chief Learning Officer's and DVU Program Manager's Birthday memos DOE Chief Learning Officer's DVU Birthday...

27

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hallam  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Nebraska Nebraska Hallam, Nebraska, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site hallam_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Hallam Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Hallam site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Inspection/Sampling Schedule Hallam Decommissioned Reactor Site Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS)

28

PRESENTATION: OVERVIEW OF DOE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (EM)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

A briefing to the SEAB Task Force on Technology Development for Environmental Management on the DOE Ofiice of Environmental Management.

29

Issues related to EM management of DOE spent nuclear fuel  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a summary of the important issues involved in managing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) owned by the Department of Energy (DOE). Issues related to civilian SNF activities are not discussed. DOE-owned SNF is stored primarily at the Hanford Site, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), Savannah River Site (SRS), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and West Valley Demonstration Project. Smaller quantities of SNF are stored at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). There is a wide variety of fuel types, including both low and high enrichment fuels from weapons production, DOE reactors, research and development programs, naval programs, and universities. Most fuel is stored in pools associated with reactor or reprocessing facilities. Smaller quantities are in dry storage. Physical conditions of the fuel range from excellent to poor or severely damaged. An issue is defined as an important question that must be answered or decision that must be made on a topic or subject relevant to achieving the complimentary objectives of (a) storing SNF in compliance with applicable regulations and orders until it can be disposed, and (b) safely disposing of DOE`s SNF. The purpose of this document is to define the issues; no recommendations are made on resolutions. As DOE`s national SNF management program is implemented, a system of issues identification, documentation, tracking, and resolution will be implemented. This document is an initial effort at issues identification. The first section of this document is an overview of issues that are common to several or all DOE facilities that manage SNF. The common issues are organized according to specific aspects of spent fuel management. This is followed by discussions of management issues that apply specifically to individual DOE facilities. The last section provides literature references.

Abbott, D.G. [EG& G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Abashian, M.S.; Chakraborti, S.; Roberson, K.; Meloin, J.M. [IT Corp. (United States)

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

30

DOE Publishes New CALiPER Report on Subjective Evaluation of...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CALiPER Report on Subjective Evaluation of LED PAR38 Lamps DOE Publishes New CALiPER Report on Subjective Evaluation of LED PAR38 Lamps November 7, 2013 - 12:00am Addthis DOE has...

31

Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order defines the safety management program required by 10 CFR 830.204(b)(5) for maintenance and the reliable performance of structures, systems and components that are part of the safety basis required by 10 CFR 830.202 at hazard category 1, 2 and 3 DOE nuclear facilities. Admin Chg 1, dated 3-12-2013. Cancels DOE O 433.1A.

2010-04-21T23:59:59.000Z

32

DOE Interim Guidance on Mercury Management Procedures and Standards...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services Waste Management Waste Disposition Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury is in the Planning Stages DOE Interim Guidance on Mercury Management...

33

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ITL  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

New Mexico New Mexico Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory (ITL), New Mexico, Site Other Regulatory Framework ITL_map ITL is a research facility originally created by the Atomic Energy Commission, a predecessor agency of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), to study respiratory health issues. In 1996, as a result of decreasing DOE funding for the type of work conducted at the laboratory, DOE awarded a Cooperative Agreement to the Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute (Lovelace) to assist them with converting the facility into a private-sector operation. Lovelace conducted remedial action in the early 1990s and completed cleanup at several sites in 1997. Property transfer legislation passed on March 30, 2009, will result in the transfer of ITL property title from DOE to Lovelace. The legislation, once property transfer occurs, will also release DOE from all environmental liability at the ITL site, including contamination from past, present, or future activities. The DOE Office of Legacy Management is responsible for historic government-owned records management and long-term groundwater monitoring at the facility. For more information about the ITL site, view the fact sheet.

34

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Harshaw Chemical Co - OH...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

OH.04-1 - DOE Letter; Baublitz to Snyder; Subject: No DOE Authority for Remedial Action; December 7, 1984. Attachment: Review Summary Report, Harshaw Chemical Company, Cleveland...

35

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Piqua  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio Ohio Piqua, Ohio, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site piqua_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Piqua Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Piqua site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Inspection/Sampling Schedule Piqua Decommissioned Reactor Site Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS) Last Updated: 6/13/2011

36

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bonus  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS), Puerto Rico, Decommissioned Reactor Site La Antiqua Central Nuclear de Aqua Hirviente Sobrecalentada Reactor Fuera de Servico Activo A D&D Program Site bonus_map3 As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS) Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2004 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the BONUS site, view the fact sheet.

37

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald Environmental Management  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Fernald Environmental Management Fernald Environmental Management Project - 027 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fernald Environmental Management Project (027) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Fernald Environmental Management Project (FEMP), formerly known as the Feed Materials Production Center, is located about 18 miles northwest of Cincinnati, Ohio. The facility produced uranium metal products between 1953 and 1989 for use in production reactors to make plutonium and tritium at other Department of Energy (DOE) sites in support of United States defense programs. Uranium metal production ended in July 1989 and resources shifted

38

DOE Office of Science Programs and NERSC Allocation Managers  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE DOE Allocation Managers Department of Energy Science Offices, Programs and Allocation Managers NERSC is overseen by the DOE NERSC Program Manager, Dave Goodwin (Dave.Goodwin@science.doe.gov; 301-903-6474). He is assisted by the DOE Allocation Managers in each of the six offices. They are listed in the table below. The DOE Allocation Managers are responsible for managing the NERSC allocations. To find your Allocation Manager, check under the Office and Program which sponsors your work, locate your DOE Program Manager, and find the corresponding Allocation Manager. You should contact your Allocation Manager with questions concerning your allocation at NERSC. NERSC manages Startup, Education, NISE and Data Pilot allocations. Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR)

39

Microsoft Word - DOE Subject Area Indic#2C05.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Subject Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for Restricted Data and Formerly Restricted Data July 2005 Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Background................................................................................................................................. 3 Difference Between Restricted Data (RD) and Formerly Restricted Data (FRD) and National Security Information (NSI) ........................................................................................ 4 Access to RD and FRD ...............................................................................................................

40

Oak Ridge National Laboratory DOE Oak Ridge Environmental Management...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Laboratory DOE Oak Ridge Environmental Management Program Background The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Oak Ridge Reservation includes several contaminated areas that...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

2014 DOE Project Management Workshop Attendees List | Department...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Attendees List 2014 DOE Project Management Workshop Attendees List 2014 PM Workshop Attendees ListName & Office.pdf More Documents & Publications Slide 1 DOE Head Contracting...

42

DOE Challenge Home Recommended Quality Management Provisions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Recommended Quality Recommended Quality Management Provisions RECOMMENDED QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS QM Provision Builder Documentation & Verification Requirements Rater/Verifier Requirements QM #1: Project Documentation Complete construction documents shall be qualified as Designed to Earn ENERGY STAR and document all additional provisions and specifications required for DOE Challenge Home including mandatory provisions: 2012 IECC envelope insulation levels, ENERGY STAR windows, duct work in conditioned space, hot water distribution requirements requirements for indoor fixtures, EPA Indoor airPLUS checklist, and Renewable Energy Ready Home Checklists. Develop and store construction documents which, at a minimum, shall include all content required to consistently implement

43

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Columbus  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Columbus, Ohio, Sites Columbus, Ohio, Sites Other Regulatory Framework columbusClosure2013 The Columbus, Ohio, Sites consist of two separate properties owned by the Battelle Memorial Institute: the King Avenue site, located in the city of Columbus, and the West Jefferson site, located approximately 15 miles west of Columbus. Battelle conducted extensive nuclear research at both locations for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies between 1943 and 1986. The facilities have been decontaminated and released for unrestricted use. Responsibility for maintaining records for the Columbus sites transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2008. The sites require records management and stakeholder support. For more information about the Columbus sites, view the fact sheet.

44

Order Module--DOE O 433.1B, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

33.1B, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE 33.1B, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES Order Module--DOE O 433.1B, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES "The familiar level of this module is designed to summarize the basic information in DOE O 433.1B, Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities. This Order canceled DOE O 433.1A. This module is divided into three sections. Section one contains the objective, general requirements, and the responsibilities assigned to field element managers. Section two includes the requirements in attachment 2 of the Order, Maintenance Management Program Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities. Section three is a summary of the guidance provided in DOE G 433.1-1, Facility Maintenance Management Program Guide for Use with DOE O 433.1.The

45

DOE Announces Winners of 2010 Federal Energy and Water Management...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

DOE Announces Winners of 2010 Federal Energy and Water Management Awards DOE Announces Winners of 2010 Federal Energy and Water Management Awards October 7, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis...

46

DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM SSAB » DOE Manual - EM SSAB » DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM This Manual supplements the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.), Appendix 2, as amended, and the General Services Administration's (GSA's) final rule "Federal Advisory Committee Management" Title 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 102-3, which establishes the policies and minimum requirements for Federal agencies to manage and administer advisory committees. The Manual provides detailed Department of Energy (DOE or Department) requirements, responsibilities, processes, and procedures for the establishment, operation, and management of advisory committees. DOE Manual - Advisory Committee Management Program

47

DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM SSAB » DOE Manual - EM SSAB » DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DOE Manual - ADVISORY COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM This Manual supplements the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.), Appendix 2, as amended, and the General Services Administration's (GSA's) final rule "Federal Advisory Committee Management" Title 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 102-3, which establishes the policies and minimum requirements for Federal agencies to manage and administer advisory committees. The Manual provides detailed Department of Energy (DOE or Department) requirements, responsibilities, processes, and procedures for the establishment, operation, and management of advisory committees. DOE Manual - Advisory Committee Management Program

48

Order Module--DOE O 433.1B, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

"The familiar level of this module is designed to summarize the basic information in DOE O 433.1B, Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities. This Order canceled DOE O 433.1A. This...

49

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ashtabula  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Ohio Ohio Ashtabula, Ohio, Site Other Regulatory Framework ashtabula2013 The Ashtabula, Ohio, Site is a 42.5-acre, privately owned site adjacent to the city of Ashtabula, about 55 miles east of Cleveland. From 1962 to 1988 Reactive Metals, Inc. (RMI) operated a facility on the property that manufactured metallic uranium tubes and rods and experimental quantities of thorium metal for use in the Hanford, Washington; and Savannah River, Georgia, weapons program reactors. RMI also extruded depleted uranium and nonradioactive materials, primarily copper-based, for the private sector. The site has been decontaminated and released for unrestricted use. Responsibility for maintaining records for the Ashtabula site was transferred to DOE's Office of Legacy Management in 2010. The site requires records management and stakeholder support. For more information about the Ashtabula site, view the fact sheet.

50

Depleted uranium: A DOE management guide  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has a management challenge and financial liability in the form of 50,000 cylinders containing 555,000 metric tons of depleted uranium hexafluoride (UF{sub 6}) that are stored at the gaseous diffusion plants. The annual storage and maintenance cost is approximately $10 million. This report summarizes several studies undertaken by the DOE Office of Technology Development (OTD) to evaluate options for long-term depleted uranium management. Based on studies conducted to date, the most likely use of the depleted uranium is for shielding of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) or vitrified high-level waste (HLW) containers. The alternative to finding a use for the depleted uranium is disposal as a radioactive waste. Estimated disposal costs, utilizing existing technologies, range between $3.8 and $11.3 billion, depending on factors such as applicability of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the location of the disposal site. The cost of recycling the depleted uranium in a concrete based shielding in SNF/HLW containers, although substantial, is comparable to or less than the cost of disposal. Consequently, the case can be made that if DOE invests in developing depleted uranium shielded containers instead of disposal, a long-term solution to the UF{sub 6} problem is attained at comparable or lower cost than disposal as a waste. Two concepts for depleted uranium storage casks were considered in these studies. The first is based on standard fabrication concepts previously developed for depleted uranium metal. The second converts the UF{sub 6} to an oxide aggregate that is used in concrete to make dry storage casks.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Statement from DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management James  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Statement from DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Statement from DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management James Rispoli on the National Academy of Public Administration's Management Review of DOE's Office of Environmental Management Statement from DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management James Rispoli on the National Academy of Public Administration's Management Review of DOE's Office of Environmental Management December 18, 2007 - 4:58pm Addthis "Today the National Academy of Public Administration released their comprehensive management review of the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM). EM is a $5.6 billion per year program responsible for the risk reduction and cleanup of the environmental legacy of the Nation's nuclear weapons program, one of the largest, most diverse,

52

Statement from DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management James  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management James Rispoli on the National Academy of Public Administration's Management Review of DOE's Office of Environmental Management Statement from DOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management James Rispoli on the National Academy of Public Administration's Management Review of DOE's Office of Environmental Management December 18, 2007 - 4:58pm Addthis "Today the National Academy of Public Administration released their comprehensive management review of the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM). EM is a $5.6 billion per year program responsible for the risk reduction and cleanup of the environmental legacy of the Nation's nuclear weapons program, one of the largest, most diverse,

53

DOE Web Managers Council Charter | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Web Managers Council Charter DOE Web Managers Council Charter DOE Web Managers Council Charter Who We Are The Department of Energy (DOE) Web Managers Council (Web Council) was created in December 2010 as a way for DOE Web Managers to collaborate across programs, and share common challenges, ideas, and best practices. Members work in various Program Offices, National Laboratories and Staff Offices and include representatives from Policy, Communications, Public Affairs, and Chief Information Officer (CIO) staffs. Our Purpose The purpose of the DOE Web Managers Council is to: Promote the use of Web best practices on DOE web sites serving internal and external audiences; Address high-level web policy issues that affect all programs; Advise and make recommendations to policy-makers, partners and other

54

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Cincinnati Milling and Machining...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of Ohio Memorandum; Ruhe to Quigley; Subject: Trip Report to Cincinnati Milling Machine Company, Cincinnati, Ohio on September 17, 1963; October 7, 1963 OH.25-2 - DOE...

55

DOE Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

transition) transition) 6/15/1999 6/30/2011 2 three month option periods 9/30/2011 M&O 1999 http://www.id.energy.gov/PSD/AMWTPHomepage.html Mike Adams 208-526-5277 Wendy Bauer 208-526-2808 Paducah Remediation EM LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky 4/22/2010 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 Site Clean up 2009 http://www.emcbc.doe.gov/dept/contracting/primecontracts.php Pam Thompson 859-219-4056 Bill Creech 859-219-4044 Argonne National Laboratory SC UChicago Argonne, LLC 7/31/2006 9/30/2015 4 yrs Award Term Earned/additional 11 yrs Award Term Available 9/30/2026 M&O 2006 http://www.anl.gov/contract/ Patricia Schuneman 630-252-2956 Sergio Martinez 630-252-2075 Kristin Palmer 630-252-2127 Oak Ridge Environmental Management

56

DOE Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

UChicago Argonne, LLC UChicago Argonne, LLC 7/31/2006 9/30/2011 4 yrs Award Term Earned/additional 11 yrs Award Term Available 9/30/2026 M&O 2006 http://www.anl.gov/contract/ Patricia Schuneman 630-252-2956 Sergio Martinez 630-252-2075 Kristin Palmer 630-252-2127 Oak Ridge Environmental Management EM Bechtel Jacobs Co LLC 12/18/1997 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 Environmental Mgmt 1998 http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/external/Home/Procurement/RecentAwards/tabid/101/De fault.aspx Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Karen Shears 865-241-6411 Ames National Laboratory SC Iowa State University 12/4/2006 12/31/2011 4yrs Award Term Earned/additional 11 yrs Award Term Available 12/31/2026 M&O 2007 http://www.ameslab.gov/operations/resources/contract Patricia Schuneman

57

DOE Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Univ. Of Chicago Argonne Univ. Of Chicago Argonne LLC 7/31/2006 9/30/2011 4 yrs Award Term Earned/additional 11 yrs Award Term Available 9/30/2026 M&O 2006 http://www.anl.gov/contract/ Patricia Schuneman 630-252-2956 Sergio Martinez 630-252-2075 Kristin Palmer 630-252-2127 Oak Ridge Environmental Management EM Bechtel Jacobs Co LLC 12/18/1997 12/31/2011 12/31/2011 Environmental Mgmt 1998 http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/external/Home/Procurement/RecentAwards/tabid/101/De fault.aspx Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Karen Shears 865-241-6411 Ames National Laboratory SC Iowa State University 12/4/2006 12/31/2011 4yrs Award Term Earned/additional 11yrs Award Term Available 12/31/2026 M&O 2007 http://www.ameslab.gov/operations/resources/contract Patricia Schuneman

58

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 433.1B, Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3.1B 3.1B MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES DOE O 433.1B Familiar Level August 2011 1 DOE O 433.1B MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the objective of DOE O 433.1B, Maintenance Management Program for DOE Nuclear Facilities? 2. What is the purpose for quantitative indicators in maintenance management? 3. What are three types of environmental controls included in a maintenance shop? 4. What is the relationship between DOE G 433.1-1 and DOE O 433.1A? 5. What is the purpose for post-maintenance testing? 6. What is the objective of a good equipment maintenance history program?

59

Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Program Management » Safety » Worker Protection Services » Program Management » Safety » Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees This Order establishes the framework for an effective worker protection program that will reduce or prevent injuries, illnesses and accidental losses by providing DOE Federal and contractor workers with a safe and healthful workplace. Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees More Documents & Publications CRAD, Machine Shop Safe Operations Assessment Plan Order Module--DOE O 440.1B, WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING NNSA) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES Audit Report: IG-0404 Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing

60

To: Supervisors and Managers Subject: Computer-Related Ergonomic Injuries  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

To: Supervisors and Managers Subject: Computer-Related Ergonomic Injuries Date: March 14, 2007 The statistics we have collected at the Lab this year are disturbing to me in the area of ergonomic injuries from-blown injuries. Over the next seven days, all supervisors must meet with their employees, discuss good ergonomic

Knowles, David William

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and FRD -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and FRD - October 2005 Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and FRD - October 2005 October 2005 The purpose of this booklet is to assist individuals of Government agencies who generate or review classified documents to recognize the presence of nuclear information that is potentially classified as Restricted Data (RD) or Formerly Restricted Data (FRD). This book is particularly helpful to document reviewers conducting declassification reviews pursuant to Executive orders. Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and FRD - October 2005 More Documents & Publications Brochure, Classification Overview of RD and FRD - September 2010 Briefing, Restricted Data Classifiers - March 2013

62

Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and FRD -  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and FRD - October 2005 Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and FRD - October 2005 October 2005 The purpose of this booklet is to assist individuals of Government agencies who generate or review classified documents to recognize the presence of nuclear information that is potentially classified as Restricted Data (RD) or Formerly Restricted Data (FRD). This book is particularly helpful to document reviewers conducting declassification reviews pursuant to Executive orders. Booklet, DOE Subject Area Indicators and Key Word List for RD and FRD - October 2005 More Documents & Publications Brochure, Classification Overview of RD and FRD - September 2010 Briefing, Restricted Data Classifiers - March 2013

63

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- BurrisPark_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

by UC-Berkeley require no further remediation. Final Conditions- The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed maintenance-only responsibility for the remaining contamination in...

64

DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory July 29, 2008 - 2:40pm Addthis...

65

DOE's New Checklist Helps Plants Assess Energy Management Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE developed the Strategic Energy Management Checklist to help manufacturing facilities conduct a high-level assessment of their energy management practices and identify opportunities to achieve greater energy savings.

66

Statement of Vernon Daub, Acting Manager of DOEs Carlsbad Field...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

For Immediate Release Statement of Vernon Daub, Acting Manager of DOE's Carlsbad Field Office, Regarding New Mexico Environment Department's Issuance of a Draft Hazardous Waste...

67

FAQS Job Task Analyses - DOE AVIATION MANAGER (AvM)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MANAGER (AvM) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS MANAGER (AvM) - JOB TASK ANALYSIS Job Analysis Worksheet for Tasks DOE AVIATION MANAGER Task Source Importance Frequency A Establishes goals for the field aviation program based on the anticipated requirements as applicable to DOE/NNSA, the field element, and other DOE/NNSA organizations that may require aviation services. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 5 1 B Implements DOE/NNSA aviation management and safety policy and establishes the field element's standards for the aviation program that will ensure an effective, safe, secure and cost-efficient operation in accordance with this Order. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 5 2 C Develops the organization's Aviation Implementation Documents (AID) and annually reviews the AID to ensure that it is current. DOE O 440.2C, chng 1 5 1

68

DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals Seeking Contractor to Manage,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals Seeking Contractor to DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals Seeking Contractor to Manage, Operate Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE Issues Draft Request for Proposals Seeking Contractor to Manage, Operate Waste Isolation Pilot Plant April 1, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor 513-246-0539 william.taylor@emcbc.doe.gov Cincinnati - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Draft Request for Proposal (RFP)seeking a management and operations contractor to maintain the Waste Isolation Pilot Plan (WIPP) and manage the DOE National Transuranic Waste (TRU) Program in Carlsbad, New Mexico. The estimated value of the anticipated contract is from $130 to $160 million per year, for five years, with an option to extend the contract for an additional five years. DOE anticipates awarding a competitive, cost-plusaward-fee

69

water-management | netl.doe.gov  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Water Management R&D Sensors & Controls Simulation Engineering High Performance Materials Innovative Energy Concepts Water Management R&D University Research CCSI NRAP Program Plan...

70

DOE Policy 141.1: Management of Cultural Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The purpose of DOE Policy 141.1 is to ensure that Department of Energy (DOE) programs and field elements integrate cultural resources management into their missions and activities and to raise the level of awareness and accountability among DOE contractors concerning the importance of the Departments cultural resource-related legal and trust responsibilities.

71

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE STD 1073-2003, Configuration Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

73-2003 73-2003 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT DOE -STD-1073-2003 Familiar Level August 2011 1 DOE-STD-1073-2003 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is the purpose of DOE-STD-1073-2003? 2. What are the objectives of configuration management? 3. To what type of DOE facility does DOE-STD-1073-2003 apply? 4. What is the first set of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) that must be included in a configuration management program? 5. What is a work control process? 6. What is the objective of change control? 7. What are three elements that a technical review is designed to verify? 8. What three elements should be included in a design basis review?

72

DOE Financial Assistance Awards: Active Project Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presented during the May 15 working lunch session at the 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting

73

Independent Oversight Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental Management Headquarters - November 2012 Independent Oversight Assessment, DOE Office of Environmental Management Headquarters - November 2012 November 2012 Assessment of Safety Culture at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Headquarters The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent assessment of the safety culture1 at the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) - Headquarters (EM-HQ). The primary objective of the evaluation was to provide information regarding the status of the safety culture at EM-HQ. The data collection phase of the assessment occurred in April and May 2012.

74

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ferro Metal and Chemical...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

- Ferro Metal & Chemical Corp. Letter; Schloss to the Vitro Mfg. Co.; Request for Price Quote; November 15, 1944 NY.42-2 - DOE MemorandumChecklist; Wallo to File; Subject:...

75

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Clevite Corp - OH 35  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Subject: Elimination Recommendation of Clevite Corporation; July 22, 1987 OH.35-2 - DOE Letter; J. Wagoner to Mayor White; Information on the Clevite Corp. site; December 12, 1994...

76

DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory DOE Selects ASE to Manage and Operate its National Renewable Energy Laboratory July 29, 2008 - 2:40pm Addthis WASHINGTON - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the Alliance for Sustainable Energy (ASE) LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden, Colorado. The cost-plus award-fee contract is valued at approximately $1.1 billion, subject to annual appropriations, over a five-year contract period. The contract includes an option to extend it for up to five additional years. "While there is certainly no 'silver bullet' that will solve the world's energy problems, we know that renewable energy and efficiency technologies

77

2014 DOE Project Management Workshop Presentations | Department...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

1. PM Update - Paul Bosco, Director, Office of Acquisition & Project Management 2. Ethics - Marianne Jennings, W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University 3....

78

Mobile Technology Management - DOE Directives, Delegations, and...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

203.2, Mobile Technology Management by Denise Hill Functional areas: Mobile Technology, Information Technology, Information Security The order establishes requirements, assigns...

79

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 151.1C Comprehensive Emergency Management System  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

O 151.1C O 151.1C COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CENTER Change No: 3 DOE O 151.1C Level: Familiar Date: 12/1/08 1 DOE O 151.1C COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to: 1. List the objectives of DOE O 151.1C, Comprehensive Emergency Management System (EMS); 2. Describe the responsibilities assigned to the following positions or groups for implementation and management of the EMS: Cognizant/field element managers Site/facility managers 3. State the purpose of a hazard survey; 4. List three phases of the planning process that should be addressed in an

80

DOE Releases Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Releases Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Risk Management Releases Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process (RMP) Guideline DOE Releases Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process (RMP) Guideline May 23, 2012 - 9:30am Addthis News Media Contact: (202) 586-4940 For Immediate Release: May 23, 2012 Department of Energy Releases Electricity Subsector Cybersecurity Risk Management Process (RMP) Guideline Public-Private Sector Collaboration Produces Guidance to Help Electric Utilities Better Understand and Assess Cybersecurity Risk WASHINGTON, DC - The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, in collaboration with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), today released guidance to help

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

DOE Announces Policy for Managing Excess Uranium Inventory | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Policy for Managing Excess Uranium Inventory Policy for Managing Excess Uranium Inventory DOE Announces Policy for Managing Excess Uranium Inventory March 12, 2008 - 10:52am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman today released a Policy Statement on the management of the Department of Energy's (DOE) excess uranium inventory, providing the framework within which DOE will make decisions concerning future use and disposition of its inventory. During the coming year, DOE will continue its ongoing program for downblending excess highly enriched uranium (HEU) into low enriched uranium (LEU), evaluate the benefits of enriching a portion of its excess natural uranium into LEU, and complete an analysis on enriching and/or selling some of its depleted uranium. Specific transactions are expected to occur in

82

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- El_Verde  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Rico El Verde, Puerto Rico, Site Other Regulatory Framework elverde The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for a tree in Study Area 4 of El Verde site in 2005....

83

1993 DOE technical standards managers workshop: Proceedings  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This workshop is focused on the benefits of the DOE technical standards program, which is focused toward the preferred use of non-Government standards for DOE activities and the development of DOE technical standards when non-Government standards are not available or are inappropriate. One goal of the program is to replace redundant site-specific standards with more universally accepted documents that have been scrutinized by experts. This replacement is discussed at the workshop along with the problems encountered and solutions found. The workshop provided an opportunity for geographically dispersed people to meet and advance their standards knowledge and efforts to support the program. Safety issues have been the driving force behind the program to date. Several companies offer products and services that support the development, processing, and retrieval of standards. This document mostly comprise vugraphs.

Not Available

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

84

A global overview of risk management of the DOE complex  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

No endeavor is risk-fire and as we realize the inherent risks in society, our only viable solution is to manage the risk. Application of an integrated risk management program of a large technological system like the DOE complex is a difficult, task; but it is the only rational means to optimize the risk-benefit equation. An effective risk management culture-within the DOE complex will in the long run, ensure a consistent response to mitigate identified risks. An effective risk management program provides responsible administrative planning and logical application of the best technical analyses. It requires the involvement of all personnel. Our objective in this paper is to point out broad perspectives that raise concerns about future DOE ask management issues and to suggest some possible remedies.

Alesso, H.P.; Majumdar, K.C.

1993-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

85

"DOE O 450.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DOE P 450.4A INTEGRATED  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

"DOE O 450.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DOE P 450.4A "DOE O 450.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DOE P 450.4A INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT POLICY FAMILIAR LEVEL "DOE O 450.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DOE P 450.4A INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT POLICY FAMILIAR LEVEL "The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections. In the first section, we will discuss the additions to DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual, which has been replaced by DOE O 450.2, Integrated Safety Management. In the second section, we will discuss the additions to DOE P 450.4, Integrated Safety Management Policy. We have provided examples and a practice to help familiarize you with the material. The practice will also help prepare you for the criterion test. Before continuing, you should obtain a copy of all the resources listed for

86

DOE-STD-1073-2003; DOE Technical Stadnard Configuration Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1073-2003 October 2003 DOE STANDARD Configuration Management U.S. Department of Energy AREA CMAN Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. DOE-STD-1073-2003 Configuration Management This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax (301) 903-9823 or on the web at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

87

DOE methods for evaluating environmental and waste management samples  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

DOE Methods for Evaluating Environmental and Waste Management Samples (DOE Methods) is a resource intended to support sampling and analytical activities for the evaluation of environmental and waste management samples from U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites. DOE Methods is the result of extensive cooperation from all DOE analytical laboratories. All of these laboratories have contributed key information and provided technical reviews as well as significant moral support leading to the success of this document. DOE Methods is designed to encompass methods for collecting representative samples and for determining the radioisotope activity and organic and inorganic composition of a sample. These determinations will aid in defining the type and breadth of contamination and thus determine the extent of environmental restoration or waste management actions needed, as defined by the DOE, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or others. The development of DOE Methods is supported by the Analytical Services Division of DOE. Unique methods or methods consolidated from similar procedures in the DOE Procedures Database are selected for potential inclusion in this document. Initial selection is based largely on DOE needs and procedure applicability and completeness. Methods appearing in this document are one of two types, {open_quotes}Draft{close_quotes} or {open_quotes}Verified{close_quotes}. {open_quotes}Draft{close_quotes} methods that have been reviewed internally and show potential for eventual verification are included in this document, but they have not been reviewed externally, and their precision and bias may not be known. {open_quotes}Verified{close_quotes} methods in DOE Methods have been reviewed by volunteers from various DOE sites and private corporations. These methods have delineated measures of precision and accuracy.

Goheen, S.C.; McCulloch, M.; Thomas, B.L.; Riley, R.G.; Sklarew, D.S.; Mong, G.M.; Fadeff, S.K. [eds.

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

Forms Management Guide for use with DOE O 200.1, Information Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Provides guidance for the development, analysis, approval, and management of forms in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). No cancellations.

2000-05-08T23:59:59.000Z

89

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio Ohio Fernald Preserve, Ohio Key Documents and Links Fernald Preserve, Harrison, Ohio, Fact Sheet pdf_icon Draft 2014 Comprehensive Legacy Management and Institutional Controls Plan pdf_icon Comprehensive Legacy Management and Institutional Controls Plan (LMICP): Volume I-Legacy Management Plan pdf_icon Volume II-Institutional Controls Plan pdf_icon Attachment A pdf_icon Attachment B pdf_icon Attachment C pdf_icon Attachment D pdf_icon Attachment E pdf_icon 2012 Site Environmental Report pdf_icon Visitors Center Site Reports Wetland Mitigation Monitoring Report Environmental Monitoring Data - Downloadable Files Fernald Closure Project Website Disclaimer Fernald Citizens Advisory Board Website Disclaimer Fernald Natural Resource Trustee Disclaimer Please be green - do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary

90

DOE Office of Environmental Management Project and Contract Management Improvement Timeline  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Improving DOE contract and project management is a top priority of the Departments seniormanagement and entire organization. View some highlights of EMs improvementactions here.

91

Subject: Proposed 216(h) Regulations To: Brian.Mills@hq.doe.gov and Lot.Cooke@hq.doe.gov.  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 12, 2012 February 12, 2012 Subject: Proposed 216(h) Regulations To: Brian.Mills@hq.doe.gov and Lot.Cooke@hq.doe.gov. We appreciate the opportunity to review the Proposed Regulation for 216(h) of the FPA (16 U.S.C. 824p(h)) and provide comments. After review of the proposed rule, we believe a few changes to the text could greatly improve in the likelihood of reducing the time and cost of necessary environmental reviews, consultations, and permit processing for electric transmission facilities crossing Federal Lands while increasing the efficiency and coordination intended by that section of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the nine-agency MOU. Comments are organized by section, with explanation and proposed changes in the wording of a specific section of the proposed rule made in bold.

92

DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator Training System for Supercritical Coal Power Plants DOE, Invensys Operations Management to Develop, Deploy Operator Training System for Supercritical Coal Power Plants December 10, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis Washington, DC - A new U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) cooperative research and development agreement to develop, test, and deploy a dynamic simulator and operator training system (OTS) could eventually help commercialize important carbon capture technologies at the nation's power plants. The high-fidelity, real-time OTS for a generic supercritical once-through (SCOT) pulverized-coal power plant will be installed at the National Energy Technology Laboratory's (NETL's) Advanced Virtual Energy Simulation

93

Acting Assistant Secretary for DOE Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Acting Assistant Secretary for DOE Office of Environmental Acting Assistant Secretary for DOE Office of Environmental Management Visits Hanford - First Visit, Commemorates Completion of Major Recovery Act Project Acting Assistant Secretary for DOE Office of Environmental Management Visits Hanford - First Visit, Commemorates Completion of Major Recovery Act Project August 11, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Geoff Tyree, DOE Geoffrey.Tyree@rl.doe.gov 509-376-4171 Media visit requirements to be completed by 2 p.m. today: This visit requires badges and an RSVP by 2 p.m. today by email to tmbirch@wch-rcc.com at Washington Closure Hanford. You must include in your email (for badging purposes) your full name exactly as it appears on your driver's license, confirm you are a U.S. Citizen, your date of birth, as well as the name, address, and phone number of the company you are

94

DOE Selects Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DOE Selects Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 8, 2007 - 12:45pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) has been selected to be the management and operating contractor for DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. "Livermore National Laboratory is a critical part of our nuclear weapons complex and has been for the last 55 years," Secretary Bodman said. "For the first time since the beginning of the laboratory a new contractor is

95

DOE Environmental Management Strategy and Experience for In-Situ  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Management Strategy and Experience for In-Situ Environmental Management Strategy and Experience for In-Situ Decommissioning DOE Environmental Management Strategy and Experience for In-Situ Decommissioning In situ decommissioning (ISD) is the permanent entombment of a contaminated facility. At present, ISD is not recognized or addressed in the Department of Energy (DOE) and Office of Environmental Management (EM) lexicon; however, ISD is not a revolutionary concept. Since the 1970s, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recognized the option of entombing a facility as a decommissioning option. Permanent entombment of a radioactively contaminated facility as a decommissioning option has been completed for one facility at the Idaho National Laboratory and is currently planned at a limited number of selected DOE facilities. The

96

Project Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Management Management Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management Processes and Procedures Cost & Contingency EDIA Escalation Rates Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Certifications Awards Lessons Learned Tools & Resources SC Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Project Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Contains resources and information that may be useful for Federal Project Directors, HQ Program Managers, senior SC management, or contractor project management personnel. Specific information includes:

97

DOE-STD-1159-2003; DOE Standard Waste Management Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

59-2003 59-2003 January 2003 DOE STANDARD WASTE MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1159-2003 iii APPROVAL The Federal Technical Capability Panel consists of senior Department of Energy managers

98

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 435.1 Radioactive Waste Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5.1 5.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS OFFICE Change No: 0 DOE O 435.1 Level: Familiar Date: 6/15/01 1 DOE O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to 1. Discuss the purpose and scope of DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management. Note: If you think that you can complete the practice at the end of this level without working through the instructional material and/or the examples, complete the practice now. The course manager will check your work. You will need to complete the practice in this level successfully before taking the criterion test.

99

DOE Awards Contract for Management of WIPP  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NEWS NEWS MEDIA CONTACTS: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tom Welch, 202/586-4316 October 12, 2000 Greg Sahd (Carlsbad), 505/234-7532 Department of Energy Competitively Awards Contract for the Management of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson today announced that the Energy Department will award a $500 million, five-year contract for the management and operation of the department's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico, to Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC. Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC, based in Carlsbad, is a joint venture between Westinghouse Government Environmental Services Company LLC and Roy F. Weston, Inc. "By holding an open competition, the department was able to challenge industry to bring their best ideas forward on actions needed to maintain and improve WIPP's safety and operational

100

DOE-STD-1055-93; DOE Standard Guideline to Good Practices For Maintenance Management Involvement at DOE Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1055-93 March 1993 DOE STANDARD GUIDELINE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT AT DOE NUCLEAR FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MNTY Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. Order No. DE93013953 DOE-STD-1055-93 FOREWORD The purpose of the Guideline to Good Practices for M

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Title: Training Effects on Emergency Management Activation Response Subject Area: Social  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Title: Training Effects on Emergency Management Activation Response Subject Area: Social Keyword considered whether local and long-term emergency management training could produce different behavioral training on emergency management behavioral response. Individuals with higher levels of training engaged

Collett Jr., Jeffrey L.

102

Contract Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contract Contract Management Ames Site Office (AMSO) AMSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Ames Site Office U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-6167 F: (630) 252-2855 Contract Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Ames Site Office's Contract Management provides leadership and maximizes the effective working relationship between Department of Energy (DOE) and the contractor; manages and administers the contract by setting and communicating expectations, integrating DOE requirements, authorizing work, and providing timely feedback to the contractor. Contract Summary and Background The Ames Laboratory contract is a cost-plus award-fee, performance-based

103

Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts 70.4_Cooperative_Audit_Strategy_0.pdf 70.5_Contractor_Compensation_-_Variable_Pay_1.pdf 70.7_Introduction_1.pdf 70.7_ch2_Environment,_Safety_and_Health_1.pdf 70.7_ch3_Contractor_Human_Resource_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch4_Security_1.pdf 70.7_ch5_Performance_Measurement_and_Assessment_1.pdf 70.7_ch6_Patent_and_Data_Rights_1.pdf 70.7_ch7_Financial_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch8_Business_and_Contract_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch10_Subcontract_Management_3.pdf 70.7_ch11_Real_Property,_Personal_Property_and_Transportation_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch12_Diversity_Plan,_EEO_and_Small_Business_1.pdf 70.7_appB_Related_Internet_Web_Sites_1.pdf 70.7_appC_Contractor_Purchasing_System_Reviews_Risk_Assessment_Matrix_1.pdf

104

Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts 0 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts Chapter 70 - DOE Management and Operating Contracts 70.4_Cooperative_Audit_Strategy_0.pdf 70.5_Contractor_Compensation_-_Variable_Pay_1.pdf 70.7_Introduction_1.pdf 70.7_ch2_Environment,_Safety_and_Health_1.pdf 70.7_ch3_Contractor_Human_Resource_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch4_Security_1.pdf 70.7_ch5_Performance_Measurement_and_Assessment_1.pdf 70.7_ch6_Patent_and_Data_Rights_1.pdf 70.7_ch7_Financial_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch8_Business_and_Contract_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch10_Subcontract_Management_3.pdf 70.7_ch11_Real_Property,_Personal_Property_and_Transportation_Management_1.pdf 70.7_ch12_Diversity_Plan,_EEO_and_Small_Business_1.pdf 70.7_appB_Related_Internet_Web_Sites_1.pdf 70.7_appC_Contractor_Purchasing_System_Reviews_Risk_Assessment_Matrix_1.pdf

105

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rocky  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Rocky Flats Site, Colorado Rocky Flats Site, Colorado A CERCLA and/or RCRA Site rkyflats_2011 Remediation at the Rocky Flats Site was conducted in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and/or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2008 and requires operation and maintenance of remedial action systems, routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Rocky Flats site, view the fact sheet. Site History Site Documents Community Involvement Contact Us Rocky Flats Benefits Administration Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Administrative Record Database

106

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Monticello  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Utah Utah Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites A CERCLA and/or RCRA Site monticello_map Remediation at the Monticello Sites was conducted in accordance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and/or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations. The sites transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and require operation and maintenance of remedial action systems, routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Monticello sites, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Inspection/Sampling Schedule Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Administrative Record Database

107

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Edge  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

South Dakota South Dakota Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites-Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the DOE Tennessee Valley Authority (UMTRCA Title II) Disposal Site, Edgemont, South Dakota Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Annual Inspection Report Long-Term Surveillance Plan Fact Sheet Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site Fact Sheet December 15, 2011

108

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bonus  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Boiling Nuclear Superheater (BONUS), Puerto Rico, Decommissioned Reactor Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet BONUS, Puerto Rico, Reactor Clausurado, Hoja de Datos Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan Plan para la vigilance y mantenimiento a largo plaza Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Reports Other Documents Español Documents Fact Sheet Boiling Nuclear Superheater, Puerto Rico, Site Fact Sheet August 2012 Reports PREPA-DOE Letter of Agreement July 2010

109

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Riverton  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Riverton, Wyoming Processing Site Riverton, Wyoming Processing Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Enhanced Characterization of Surficial Aquifer Fact Sheet Where Does My Drinking Water Come From? May 10, 2012: Data Review and Validation Report of May 3, 2012, Sampling Event ALS Environmental Laboratory Report on May 3, 2012, Sampling Event Data Validation Package-June 2013 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling 2012 Enhanced Characterization and Monitoring Report Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site Enhanced Characterization of the Surficial Aquifer Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site Data Summary Report Evaluation of Groundwater Constituents and Seasonal Variation at the Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site

110

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Blue  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

New Mexico New Mexico Bluewater, New Mexico, Disposal Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Data Validation Package-May 2013 Groundwater Sampling at Bluewater, New Mexico, Disposal Site 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Site-Bluewater, New Mexico, Disposal Site Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the DOE Bluewater (UMTRCA Title II) Disposal Site, Near Grants, New Mexico Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet

111

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gasbuggy  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

New Mexico New Mexico Gasbuggy, New Mexico, Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Interagency Agreement between DOE, BLM, and USDA Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. Status of Pending Decision Documents Long-Term Surveillance Plan Under development All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Data Validation Package Other Documents Fact Sheet Gasbuggy, New Mexico, Site Fact Sheet April 27, 2009 Data Validation Package Gasbuggy, New Mexico, Natural Gas and Produced Water Sampling and Analysis Results for 2012 LMS/GSB/S09448 December 2012

112

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Geothermal  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Geothermal Test Facility, California Geothermal Test Facility, California This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Other Documents Fact Sheet Geothermal Test Facility, California, Site Fact Sheet December 12, 2011 Other Documents Geothermal Test Facility (GTF) Closure and Records Transfer (DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration memorandum) April 23, 2004 Closure Report East Mesa Geothermal Test Facility July 31, 1998 Recission of Waste Discharge Requirements for U.S. Department of Energy, Geothermal Test Facility, East Mesa - El Centro, Imperial County (California Regional Water Quality Control Board letter) January 4, 1997

113

Impact of DOE Orders on Waste Management Operation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Department of Energy Orders are the internal documents which govern the management of all Department of Energy facilities and operations. DOE Orders are the vehicles by which Federal and state laws and regulations are applied to Department of Energy activities. A selected set of 22 Department of Energy Orders was reviewed to identify the applicability and impact of each Order on waste management operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Of the 22 Orders reviewed, five set forth requirements which have a high degree of impact on waste management activities. Eight Orders have a moderate degree of impact on waste management activities, and the remaining nine Orders have a low degree of impact.

Klein, R.B.; Jennrich, E.A.; Shuman, R.; Sandquist, G.M. (Rogers and Associates Engineering Corp., Salt Lake City, UT (United States)); Rutz, A.C.; Littleton, M.W.; McCauce, C.H. (Wastren, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States))

1989-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ITL  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

New Mexico New Mexico Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory (ITL), New Mexico, Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. Status of Pending Decision Documents Property Transfer (Section 13005) Public Law 111-11, 2009, Omnibus Public Land Management Act Quitclaim Deed that supports this document anticipated to be posted by end of September 2013 All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Other Documents Fact Sheet Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory (ITL), New Mexico, Site Fact Sheet June 11, 2012

115

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- MURR  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Missouri Missouri Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR), Missouri, Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Other Documents Fact Sheet Missouri University Research Reactor Site Fact Sheet December 15, 2011 Other Documents Removal of TRU Waste from the Missouri University Research Reactor Final Closeout Report September 16, 2004 Approval of the Critical Decision 4 for the Mixed Transuranic (TRU) Waste Removal Project, University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR), Columbia, Missouri, and Transfer of Records to Office of Legacy Management (LM) August 24, 2004

116

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Visitors Center  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio > Fernald > Visitors Center > Visitors Center Ohio > Fernald > Visitors Center > Visitors Center Fernald Preserve, Ohio Fernald Preserve Visitors Center Fernald Visitors Center Fernald Preserve Home Page Visitors Center Directions Event Calendar Community Meeting Room Guided Tour Educational Field Trip Speaker Request Brochures Fact Sheets Presentations BioBlitz Geocaching Pets Policy The Fernald Preserve Visitors Center is a 10,000-square-foot green building that celebrates the rich and varied history of the Fernald site. Information on the site's natural, Native American, settlement and farming, uranium production, and environmental cleanup eras, as well as the recent ecological restoration and legacy management mission, is presented through a series of exhibits. Admission to the Visitors Center is free, and

117

Integrated Safety Management System Guide (Volume 1) for use with Safety Management System Policies (DOE P 450.4, DOE P 450.5, and DOE P 450.6); The Functions, Responsibilities, and Authorities Manual; and DOE Acquisition Regulation  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Department of Energy (DOE) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Guide is approved for use by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). This Guide is available for use by all DOE components and their contractors. This Guide is a consensus document coordinated by EH and prepared under the direction of the DOE Safety Management Implementation Team (SMIT). Replaces DOE G 450.4-1A. Canceled by DOE G 450.4-1C.

2001-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Recommendation 224: Recommendations on the FY 2016 DOE Oak Ridge Environmental Management Budget Request  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

ORSSAB provides recommendations on the DOE Oak Ridge Environmental Management budget request for FY 2016.

119

DOE National Analytical Management Program Draws Global Interest |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

National Analytical Management Program Draws Global Interest National Analytical Management Program Draws Global Interest DOE National Analytical Management Program Draws Global Interest February 27, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Hnin Khaing focuses on her work at WIPP Laboratories near Carlsbad, New Mexico Hnin Khaing focuses on her work at WIPP Laboratories near Carlsbad, New Mexico Corey White works at WIPP Laboratories near Carlsbad, New Mexico Corey White works at WIPP Laboratories near Carlsbad, New Mexico Hnin Khaing focuses on her work at WIPP Laboratories near Carlsbad, New Mexico Corey White works at WIPP Laboratories near Carlsbad, New Mexico CARLSBAD, N.M. - The National Analytical Management Program (NAMP), which coordinates analytical services and capabilities throughout DOE, has garnered global interest. "NAMP is addressing a vital need to attain the most effective use of

120

US DOE Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Jump to: navigation, search Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Name Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Agency/Company /Organization U.S. Department of Energy Sector Energy Focus Area Energy Efficiency Topics Pathways analysis, Resource assessment Website http://www1.eere.energy.gov/fe Country United States Northern America References FEMP homepage[1] Abstract The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides services, tools, and expertise to Federal agencies to help them achieve their legislated and executive-ordered energy, greenhouse gas, and water goals. These are delivered through project, technical, and program services. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Three Mile Island waste management: a DOE Perspective  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) is conducting waste management research and development activities which are applicable to the cleanup of the Three Mile Island-Unit 2 nuclear reactor. These activities have enabled DOE to provide timely assistance to General Public Utilities (GPU), the utility owner, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the State of Pennsylvania in their efforts to quickly and safely clean up the damaged reactor. The DOE has been particularly active in evaluating proposed cleanup systems, providing information on waste characteristics, and advising GPU and NRC as to appropriate disposal methods for the waste generated during the cleanup. A description and discussion of some of these activities is presented.

D'Ambrosia, J.T.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

122

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 CHAPTER 2 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR OPERATIONAL CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT This guidance is appropriate for high-hazard facilities expected to operate for an extended period. Since DOE facilities vary in hazard level and circumstances of operation, a graded approach to implementation should be adopted. 2.1 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ELEMENT The program management element of a configuration management (CM) program coordinates program development and implementation and ensures overall program effectiveness. This element leads the development of the other CM program elements. Development of an effective CM program should be initiated promptly, where needed, to address known issues, to improve compliance with various DOE Orders, and to produce the benefits of improved safety, reduced errors, and increased efficiency.

123

DOE JGI Releases a New Version of its Metagenome Data Management & Analysis  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

February 7, 2008 February 7, 2008 DOE JGI Releases a New Version of its Metagenome Data Management & Analysis System WALNUT CREEK, CA--Targeting its ever-expanding user community, the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI) has released an upgraded version of the IMG/M metagenome data management and analysis system, accessible to the public at http://img.jgi.doe.gov/m. IMG/M provides tools for analyzing the functional capability of microbial communities based on their metagenome DNA sequence in the context of reference isolate genomes. The new version of IMG/M includes five additional metagenome datasets generated from microbial community samples that were the subject of recently published studies. These include the metagenomic and functional analysis of termite hindgut microbiota (Nature

124

DOE P 141.1 Department of Energy Management of Cultural Resources  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

All Departmental Elements Office of Environment, Safety and Health DOE P 141.1 U.S. Department of Energy POLICY Washington, D.C. Approved: 5-2-01 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MANAGEMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this Policy is- * to ensure that Department of Energy (DOE) programs, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and field elements integrate cultural resources management into their missions and activities and * to raise the level of awareness and accountability among DOE (including NNSA) contractors concerning the importance of the Department's cultural resource-related legal and trust responsibilities. Preservation and protection of America's cultural heritage are important functions and responsibilities of

125

SUBJECT:  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Act and the Prohibited Personnel Practices. A DOECAST was disseminated on April 24, 2013 informing the DOE workforce about the Non-Disclosure Policies, Forms and Agreements,...

126

Management of Heavy Isotope in the DOE Complex  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Currently each Department Of Energy (DOE) Program office manages its own nuclear materials through activities such as production, processing, storage, transportation, and disposition. However, recognizing the need to strengthen its strategic approach to the integrated life-cycle management of nuclear materials, DOE established the Nuclear Materials Management Stewardship Initiative (NMMSI) in January 2000. The NMMSI's first visible product was the Integrated Nuclear Material Management Plan in which it was generally recommended that DOE take a cross-cutting look at managing its nuclear materials, and specifically recommended that four Nuclear Material Management Groups (NMMGs) be formed. These groups were established to facilitate management of nuclear materials for which DOE has or may have responsibility, including many presently not in DOE's direct control. One of these NMMGs, the Heavy Isotope Management Group (HIMG) was established at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Dec ember 2000, to facilitate management of (a) actinide and their decay products (except sealed sources) and (b) isotopically enriched stable and radioactive isotopes except uranium and lithium, but excluding thorium, uranium, spent fuel, and weapons or reactor grade plutonium which are addressed by other NMMGs. Despite its short duration and relatively limited funding, the HIMG has facilitated the disposition of heavy isotopes from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). The primary disposition options have been to facilitate reuse of valuable heavy isotopes by matching custodians of unwanted materials with other users that seek such materials for new applications. This approach has the dual advantages of avoiding custodian disposal costs plus cost to the user of obtaining newly produced material. The HIMG has also prepared issue papers on neptunium and americium/curium that identify the resources, potential uses, and disposal pathways for the materials across the DOE Complex. In the future the HIMG expects to comprehensively identify the status of the U.S. heavy isotope inventory, prepare additional issue papers and plans charting the future of this inventory, and to facilitate execution of the plan.

Canon, R.; Croff, A.; Boyd, L.

2002-02-27T23:59:59.000Z

127

Order Module--DOE O 151.1C, COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Management DOE-STD-1151-2002, Facility Representative DOE-STD-1137-2007, Fire Protection Engineering DOE-STD-1138-2007, Industrial Hygiene DOE-STD-1150-2002, Quality Assurance...

128

To: Mansueti, Lawrence Subject: DCPSC Complaint DOE Docket #EO-05-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:18 PM To: Mansueti, Lawrence Subject: DCPSC Complaint DOE Docket #EO-05-01 Attached please find our letter regarding the DCPSC complaint that we ask you to please file for consideration in DOE's Docket #EO-05-01. Thank you. Elizabeth Chimento and Poul Hertel 1200 North Pitt Street Alexandria, Virginia November 14, 2005 Joseph T. Kelliher, Chairman Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: District of Columbia Public Service Commission Emergency Petition and Complaint Docket No. EL05-145-000 Dear Chairman Kelliher: In the continuing dialogue regarding the Potomac River Generating Station, it is

129

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- SiteA  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Illinois Illinois Site A/Plot M, Illinois, Decommissioned Reactor Site A D&D Program Site sitea_map As part of the DOE Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Program, the Office of Legacy Management manages the Site A/Plot M Decommissioned Reactor Site and ensures compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental protection laws and regulations, executive orders, and internal DOE policies. The site transferred to the Office of Legacy Management in 2003 and requires routine inspection and maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support. For more information about the Site A/Plot M site, view the fact sheet. Site Documents and Links Contact Us Inspection/Sampling Schedule Site A/Plot M Decommissioned Reactor Mapping and Monitoring (GEMS)

130

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-93-Pt.2 3-93-Pt.2 November 1993 DOE STANDARD GUIDE FOR OPERATIONAL CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Including the Adjunct Programs of Design Reconstitution and Material Condition and Aging Management PART ll U.S. Department of Energy AREA CMAN Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution Is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. Order No. DE94005408 i CONTENTS FOREWORD .

131

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 430.1B Real Property Asset Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0.1B 0.1B REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CENTER Change No: 1 DOE: O 430.1B Level: Familiar Date: 12/1/04 1 DOE O 430.1B REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to perform the following: 1. State when a site is required to have and maintain a ten-year site plan (TYSP). What is needed when a TYSP is not required? 2. Discuss contractor requirements for real property asset planning. 3. Discuss the vehicles used to establish land-use planning and management. 4. Define the term "value engineering." 5. Discuss how repair costs associated with real property asset deficiencies are

132

Integrated Safety Management System Guide (Volume 1) for use with Safety Management System Policies (DOE P 450.4, DOE P 450.5, and DOE P 450.6); The Functions, Responsibilities, and Authorities Manual; and DOE Acquisition Regulation  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Department of Energy (DOE) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Guide is approved for use by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). This Guide is available for use by all DOE components and their contractors. This Guide is a consensus document coordinated by EH and prepared under the direction of the DOE Safety Management Implementation Team (SMIT). Canceled by DOE G 450.4-1C.

2001-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

DOE/EIS-0203-SA-01; Supplement Analysis of the INEEL Portion of the April 1995 Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final Environmental Impact  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Operations Office 850 Energy Drive Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401-1563 November 2002 SUBJECT: Conclusions of the Supplement Analysis of the DOE Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and INEL Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs EIS (1995 EIS) ~ Dear Citizen: The Record of Decision (ROD) for the DOE Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and INEL Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs EIS (1995 EIS) left several decisions concerning INEEL proposed actions outstanding. That is, decisions were deferred .pending further project definition, funding priorities, or appropriate review under NEPA" In May 2000 a team of DOE-ID program representatives and subject area technical specialists (interdisciplinary

134

Subject:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

29, 2014 1 MP No. 741 Subject: SOL heat and particle transport studies of inner-wall limited discharges From: J.L. Terry, B. LaBombard, R. Pitts (IO), M. Kocan (IO), C. Theiler, S....

135

Contract Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contract Contract Management Berkeley Site Office (BSO) BSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Berkeley Site Office U.S. Department of Energy One Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720 P: (510) 486-5784 E: bsowebinfo@bso.science.doe.gov Contract Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Contract Summary LBNL is managed and operated by the Regents of the University of California under prime contract number DE-AC02-05CH11231. This is a cost-reimbursement M&O performance-based contract with special performance fee and award term provisions. As of 2012, the Contractor has earned a total of 5 years towards the possible additional 15 years of the current contract term. The contract period of performance is April 19, 2005 - May 31, 2015, for each

136

DOE Announces Webinars on Kick-Starting an Energy Management Program,  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Kick-Starting an Energy Management Kick-Starting an Energy Management Program, SunShot Incubator Projects, and More DOE Announces Webinars on Kick-Starting an Energy Management Program, SunShot Incubator Projects, and More December 20, 2013 - 8:58am Addthis EERE offers webinars to the public on a range of subjects, from adopting the latest energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies to training for the clean energy workforce. Webinars are free; however, advanced registration is typically required. You can also watch archived webinars and browse previously aired videos, slides, and transcripts. Upcoming Webinars January 7: Live Webinar on Kick-starting Your Energy Management Program Webinar Sponsor: EERE's Better Buildings Initiative The Energy Department will present a live webinar titled "Kick-Starting

137

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-91)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2002 , 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-91) Tom Morse, KEWL-4 TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Hood River Fish Habitat (Evans Creek Culvert Replacement) Project No: 1998-021-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.13 Culvert removal/replacement to improve fish passage, 2.1 Maintain healthy riparian plant communities, 2.4 Provide filter strips to catch sediment and other pollutants, 2.6 Native seeds inventory, 2.7 Avoid exotic species, 7.2 Install hydraulic structures at low streamflows, 7.3 Minimize erosion

138

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-57)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 12, 2001 July 12, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KECN-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-57) Allyn Meuleman - KEWU Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Idaho Fish Screening Improvement (Champion, Iron, Fourth of July, Goat Creeks) Project No: 1994-015-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.15 Fish passage enhancement - fishways; 4.25 Consolidate/Replace irrigation diversion dams; 4.10 Water Conveyance: pipeline. Location: Stanley, Custer County, Idaho. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to fund a project that will enhance in-stream

139

DOE technology information management system database study report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To support the missions of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Special Technologies Program, Argonne National Laboratory is defining the requirements for an automated software system that will search electronic databases on technology. This report examines the work done and results to date. Argonne studied existing commercial and government sources of technology databases in five general areas: on-line services, patent database sources, government sources, aerospace technology sources, and general technology sources. First, it conducted a preliminary investigation of these sources to obtain information on the content, cost, frequency of updates, and other aspects of their databases. The Laboratory then performed detailed examinations of at least one source in each area. On this basis, Argonne recommended which databases should be incorporated in DOE`s Technology Information Management System.

Widing, M.A.; Blodgett, D.W.; Braun, M.D.; Jusko, M.J.; Keisler, J.M.; Love, R.J.; Robinson, G.L. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). Decision and Information Sciences Div.

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-70)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

(8-89) memorandum DATE: 7/19/02 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-70) Bill Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist TO: Proposed Action: Vegetation Management on sections of the McNary-Ross, McNary-Horse Heaven, Horse Heaven-Harvarlum, Harvarlum-Big Eddy, and Hanford-John Day Transmission lines. The treatment areas are identified in Step 1 of the Planning Steps shown below. The work will involve the control of noxious weeds in the subject rights-of-ways (ROWs). Location: The ROWs are located in Umatilla and Sherman Counties, Oregon and Benton and Klickitat Counties, Washington, all being in the Walla Walla and Redmond Regions.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

DOE General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for Management and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for Management and General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for Management and Operations Contractors DOE General Counsel Issues Arbitration Guidance for Management and Operations Contractors February 3, 2010 - 5:31pm Addthis Washington, DC - The Office of the General Counsel, in conjunction with the Office of General Counsel of the NNSA, has reviewed the question of whether Department of Energy contractors can include binding arbitration in their contracts with third-parties. We have determined that there is currently no legal prohibition on M&O contractors including binding arbitration clauses in their contracts with others. In fact, we believe it often will be a good idea to include arbitration clauses as a means of limiting the risk of litigation which is often more time consuming and expensive than

142

Assessment of Disposal Options for DOE-Managed High-Level Radioactive...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Assessment of Disposal Options for DOE-Managed High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel Assessment of Disposal Options for DOE-Managed High-Level Radioactive Waste and...

143

Order Module--DOE G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDE  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Guide has two purposes. One purpose is to assist DOE contractors in developing, describing, and implementing an ISMS to comply with DOE P 450.4, Safety Management system Policy; DOE P 450.5,...

144

Nuclear Facility Maintenance Management Program Guide for Use with DOE O 433.1  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide describes a maintenance management program that would be acceptable to DOE for meeting the requirements of DOE O 433.1. Canceled by DOE G 433.1-1A.

2001-09-05T23:59:59.000Z

145

EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-17) Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Management Program EIS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 13, 2001 September 13, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-17) Joe HeHerrera - KEWU Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Eagle Lakes Ranch Acquisition and Restoration Project No: 2000-025-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): Resource Acquisition Techniques - 1.1 Fee-Title Acquisition Location: Franklin County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Columbia National Wildlife Refuge Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to partially fund the acquisition of 7,630 acres

146

Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-38)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14, 2004 14, 2004 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-38) Joe DeHerrera Fish and Wildlife Project Manager, KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Proposed Weaver Slough Conservation Easement Project No: 2002-042 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS [page A/2]): 1.2 Easement Acquisition Location: Flathead River System, Flathead County, Montana Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Flathead Land Trust Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to purchase the conservation easements on the Sanders (307 acres) and Seabaugh (449 acres) parcels of the Weaver Slough to ensure that

147

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-83)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

19, 2002 19, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-83) John Baugher Fish and Wildlife Project Manager, KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Bear Creek Irrigation Siphon Project Project No: 1993-066-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 1.8 Bank Protection; 1.9 Structural Bank Protection using Bio Engineering Techniques; 1.10 Structural Bank Protection using Engineering Structures; 1.14 Reduce Scour and Deposition at Hydraulic Structures; 1.15 Fish Passage Enhancement-Fishways; 1.16 Spawning Habitat Enhancements; 1.17 Rearing Habitat Enhancements; 2.1 Maintain Healthy Riparian Plant Communities; 2.4 Provide Filter Strips to

148

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- California Institute of Technology -  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

California Institute of Technology California Institute of Technology - CA 04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: California Institute of Technology (CA.04 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Pasadena , California CA.04-1 Evaluation Year: 1989 CA.04-1 Site Operations: Research and development. CA.04-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - NRC licensed facility CA.04-1 CA.04-3 Radioactive Materials Handled: None indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: No Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to California Institute of Technology CA.04-1 - DOE Letter; Wallo to Carwell; Subject: List of California Sites; May 17, 1989 CA.04-3 - Aerospace Letter; Young to Wallo; Subject: Elimination

149

SUBJECT:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

most most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: [Insert Office] NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 2 pages, 0 attachment Summary of Changes to Policy 450.8 Environment, Safety, and Health Revised Version Issued as Policy 450.9 LM Policy 450.8 Environment, Safety, and Health of 05/29/09, has undergone minor revisions. This Policy has been revised to include a new Executive Order and make revisions for updated DOE Orders that LM abides by. Please replace LM Policy 450.8 with LM Policy 450.9.

150

Order Module--DOE O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

35.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 35.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Order Module--DOE O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management, was issued by DOE in September 1988. As early as 1990, DOE began analyzing, assessing, and reviewing the process of implementing the Order. DOE revised the Order on radioactive waste management for several reasons: - After thorough technical reviews and analyses, DOE and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board concluded that DOE Order 5820.2A did not adequately address the Department's radioactive waste management and disposal practices. -There had been significant advances in radioactive waste management practices and changes in DOE since the Order was issued in 1988. - Risk-based and performance-based requirements were determined to be

151

Order Module--DOE O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Order Module--DOE O 435.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management, was issued by DOE in September 1988. As early as 1990, DOE began analyzing, assessing, and reviewing the process of implementing the Order. DOE revised the Order on radioactive waste management for several reasons: - After thorough technical reviews and analyses, DOE and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board concluded that DOE Order 5820.2A did not adequately address the Department's radioactive waste management and disposal practices. -There had been significant advances in radioactive waste management practices and changes in DOE since the Order was issued in 1988. - Risk-based and performance-based requirements were determined to be

152

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 460.1C Packaging and Transportation Safety and DOE O 460.2A Departmental Materials Transportation and Packaging Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

60.1C 60.1C PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DOE O 460.2A DEPARTMENTAL MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION AND PACKAGING MANAGEMENT DOE O 460.1C and 460.2A Familiar Level June 2011 1 DOE O 460.1C PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DOE O 460.2A DEPARTMENTAL MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION AND PACKAGING MANAGEMENT FAMILIAR LEVEL _________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources, you will be able to perform the following: 1. What are the objectives of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) O 460.1C? 2. What is the DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) exemption process in DOE O 460.1C? 3. What are the onsite safety requirements specified by DOE O 460.1C? 4. What are the objectives of DOE O 460.2A?

153

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hoe Creek Underground Coal  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hoe Creek Underground Coal Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Site - 045 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hoe Creek Underground Coal Gasification Site (045) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Hoe Creek Underground Gasification site occupies 80 acres of land located in Campbell County, Wyoming. The site was used to investigate the process and environmental parameters of underground coal gasification technologies in the 1970s. The Department of Energy¿s (DOE) current mission is limited to completing environmental remediation activities at the site. This property is owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM),

154

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL July 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) a monthly summary of the Project Hanford Management Contractor's (PHMC) Environmental Management (EM) performance by Fluor Hanford (FH) and its subcontractors. In addition to project-specific information, it includes some PHMC-level data not detailed elsewhere in the report. Section A, Executive Summary, provides an executive level summary of the cost, schedule, and technical performance described in this report. It summarizes performance for the period covered, highlights areas worthy of management attention, and provides a forward look to some of the upcoming key performance activities as extracted from the PHMC baseline. The remaining sections provide detailed performance data relative to each individual Project (e.g., Waste Management, Spent Nuclear Fuels, etc.), in support of Section A of the report. Unless otherwise noted, the Safety, Conduct of Operations, and Cost/Schedule data contained herein is as of May 31,2001. All other information is updated as of June 27,2001 unless otherwise noted. ''Stoplight'' boxes are used to indicate at a glance the condition of a particular area. Green boxes denote on schedule. Yellows denote behind schedule but recoverable. Red is either missed or unrecoverable.

EDER, D.M.

2001-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL May 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) a monthly summary of the Project Hanford Management Contractor's (PHMC) Environmental Management (EM) performance by Fluor Hanford (FH) and its subcontractors. In addition to project-specific information, it includes some PHMC-level data not detailed elsewhere in the report. Section A, Executive Summary, provides an executive level summary of the cost, schedule, and technical performance described in this report. It summarizes performance for the period covered, highlights areas worthy of management attention, and provides a forward look to some of the upcoming key performance activities as extracted from the PHMC baseline. The remaining sections provide detailed performance data relative to each individual Project (e g , Waste Management, Spent Nuclear Fuels, etc.), in support of Section A of the report. Unless otherwise noted, the Safety, Conduct of Operations, and Cost/Schedule data contained herein is as of March 31, 2001. All other information is updated as of April 26, 2001 unless otherwise noted. ''Stoplight'' boxes are used to indicate at a glance the condition of a particular area. Green boxes denote on schedule. Yellows denote behind schedule but recoverable. Red is either missed or unrecoverable.

EDER, D.M.

2001-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

156

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL April 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) a monthly summary of the Project Hanford Management Contractor's (PHMC) Environmental Management (EM) performance by Fluor Hanford (FH) and its subcontractors. In addition to project-specific information, it includes some PHMC-level data not detailed elsewhere in the report. Section A, Executive Summary, provides an executive level summary of the cost, schedule, and technical performance described in this report. It summarizes performance for the period covered, highlights areas worthy of management attention, and provides a forward look to some of the upcoming key performance activities as extracted from the PHMC baseline. The remaining sections provide detailed performance data relative to each individual Project (e.g., Waste Management, Spent Nuclear Fuels, etc.), in support of Section A of the report. Unless otherwise noted, the Safety, Conduct of Operations, and Cost/Schedule data contained herein is as of February 28, 2001. All other information is updated as of March 26, 2001 unless otherwise noted. ''Stoplight'' boxes are used to indicate at a glance the condition of a particular area. Green boxes denote on schedule. Yellows denote behind schedule but recoverable. Red is either missed or unrecoverable.

EDER, D.M.

2001-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL March 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) a monthly summary of the Project Hanford Management Contractor's (PHMC) Environmental Management (EM) performance by Fluor Hanford (FH) and its subcontractors. In addition to project-specific information, it includes some PHMC-level data not detailed elsewhere in the report. Section A, Executive Summary, provides an executive level summary of the cost, schedule, and technical performance described in this report. It summarizes performance for the period covered, highlights areas worthy of management attention, and provides a forward look to some of the upcoming key performance activities as extracted from the PHMC baseline. The remaining sections provide detailed performance data relative to each individual Project (e.g., Waste Management, Spent Nuclear Fuels, etc.), in support of Section A of the report. Unless otherwise noted, the Safety, Conduct of Operations, and Cost/Schedule data contained herein is as of January 31, 2001. All other information is updated as of February 20, 2001 unless otherwise noted. ''Stoplight'' boxes are used to indicate at a glance the condition of a particular area. Green boxes denote on schedule. Yellows denote behind schedule but recoverable. Red is either missed or unrecoverable.

EDER, D.M.

2001-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

85 85 CHAPTER 4 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR MATERIAL CONDITION AND AGING MANAGEMENT This guidance is appropriate for high-hazard facilities expected to operate for an extended period. Since DOE facilities vary in hazard level and circumstances of operation, a graded approach to implementation should be adopted. As shown in Figure 4-1, Material Condition and Aging Management (MCA) activities are developed and implemented in three distinct phases: a preliminary phase, a detailed or main phase, and an ongoing phase. The preliminary MCA phase includes activities necessary to estimate the facility remaining lifetime and to develop the MCA program plan. The detailed MCA phase builds on the preliminary estimate of facility remaining lifetime with more rigorous evaluations of aging degradation mechanisms

159

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-64): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 4/26/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2002 6, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-64) Truman Conn - TFP Regional Manager, Walla Walla Region Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for Substations and Non-Electric Facilities in the Walla Walla Region (See Attachment A for a complete list of facilities) Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to manage vegetation inside and around electrical substations and associated facilities. Vegetation management within the substation shall include the bare ground management of all graveled areas. These areas shall primarily be maintained with the use of herbicides. The management of vegetation outside the substation and associated facilities

160

DOE/NNSA Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Management Contracts Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor Award Date End Date Options/Award Term Ultimate Potential Expiration Date Contract FY Competed Parent Companies/ LLC Partners DOE Site Procurement Director DOE Contracting Officer SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) SC Stanford University DE-AC03-76SF00515 1/25/1981 9/30/2017 9/30/2017 M&O 1981 Stanford University Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Kyong H. Watson 650-926-5203 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) SC Battelle Memorial Institute DE-AC05-76RL01830 12/30/2002 9/30/2017 9/30/2017 M&O 1965 Battelle Memorial Institute Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Ryan Kilbury 509-372-4030 Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) SC Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC DE-AC02-98CH10886 1/5/1998 1/4/2015 1/4/2015 M&O 1998 Battelle Memorial Institute

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

DOE/NNSA Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Management Contracts Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor Award Date End Date Options/Award Term Ultimate Potential Expiration Date Contract FY Competed Parent Companies/ LLC Partners DOE Site Procurement Director DOE Contracting Officer SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) SC Stanford University DE-AC03-76SF00515 1/25/1981 9/30/2017 9/30/2017 M&O 1981 Stanford University Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Kyong H. Watson 650-926-5203 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) SC Battelle Memorial Institute DE-AC05-76RL01830 12/30/2002 9/30/2017 9/30/2017 M&O 1965 Battelle Memorial Institute Barbara Jackson 865-576-0976 Ryan Kilbury 509-372-4030 Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) SC Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC DE-AC02-98CH10886 1/5/1998 1/4/2015 1/4/2015 M&O 1998 Battelle Memorial Institute

162

Earned Value Management System (EVMS) - DOE Directives, Delegations...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0A, Earned Value Management System (EVMS) by Rick Blaisdell Functional areas: Capital Assets, Contract Management, Program Management, Project Management This Guide provides...

163

Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Cancels DOE 3790.1B, Except VIII; attach. 2, para. 2C, 2D(2)-(3), 2E(1)-(8), attach. 3, para. 2C, 2D(2)-(3), 2E(1)-(7), of DOE 5480.4; DOE 5480.7A; DOE 5480.8A; DOE 5480.9A; DOE 5480.10; DOE 5480.16A; DOE 5483.1A

1995-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

164

Order Module--DOE O 151.1C, COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

151.1C, COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 151.1C, COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Order Module--DOE O 151.1C, COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The familiar level of this module is designed to summarize the basic information in DOE O 151.1C, Comprehensive Emergency Management System. This module is divided into two sections. in the first section, we will discuss the objectives and responsibilities of DOE O 151.1C, Comprehensive Emergency Management System. In the second section, we will discuss the requirements included in chapters III through XI in the Order. The information provided will meet the relevant requirements in the following DOE Functional Area Qualification Standards: DOE-STD-1177-2004, Emergency Management DOE-STD-1151-2002, Facility Representative DOE-STD-1137-2007, Fire Protection Engineering

165

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-42)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 2002 5, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-42) Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Bob Sweet - TFNF/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Snohomish - Murray #1 from str 1\4 to str 18\5. The proposed work will be to remove both danger and reclaim trees outside and inside the right-of-way, respectively. Right-of-way width varies from 125 to 300 feet. Location: The ROW is located in Snohomish County, WA, being in the Snohomish Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to remove both reclaim and danger trees inside and outside the transmission line right of way. BPA crews or contract crews will cut only trees that have

166

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-40)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2002 9, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-40) William T. Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Allston-Keeler 500 kV Transmission Line ROW exclusive to BLM lands between 8/4 through 27/4. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor with an average corridor width of 150 feet. Location: The ROW is located in Washington and Columbia County, in the State of Oregon, Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways

167

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-35)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14, 2001 14, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-35) James Jellison - TFO/Olympia Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Chehalis-Mayfield No. 1 230 kV Transmission Line ROW and the Mossy Rock-Chehalis Transmission Line ROW, between 7/1 to 27/10. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor with an average corridor width of 162 feet. Location: The ROW is located in Lewis County, WA, being in the Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways

168

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- St Louis Airport - MO 01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Airport - MO 01 Airport - MO 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites St. Louis Airport, MO Alternate Name(s): Airport Site St. Louis Airport Storage Site (SLAPS) Former Robertson Storage Area Robertson Airport MO.01-1 MO.01-2 Location: Brown Road, Robertson, Missouri MO.01-2 Historical Operations: Stored uranium process residues containing uranium, radium, and thorium for the MED and AEC. MO.01-2 MO.01-3 MO.01-4 Eligibility Determination: Eligible MO.01-1 MO.01-7 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys MO.01-4 MO.01-5 Site Status: Cleanup in progress by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. MO.01-6 USACE Website Long-term Care Requirements: To be determined upon completion. Also see Documents Related to St. Louis Airport, MO MO.01-1 - DOE Memorandum; Coffman to LaGrone; Subject: Authorization

169

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Michigan Velsicol Chemical Corp - MI  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Michigan Velsicol Chemical Corp - Michigan Velsicol Chemical Corp - MI 03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MICHIGAN [VELSICOL] CHEMICAL CORP. (MI.03 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Velsicol Chemical Corp. MI.03-1 Location: St. Louis , Michigan MI.03-2 Evaluation Year: Circa 1987 MI.03-3 Site Operations: Rare earth processing facility. MI.03-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - NRC survey MI.03-3 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Rare Earths MI.03-3 Radiological Survey(s): Yes MI.03-2 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to MICHIGAN [VELSICOL] CHEMICAL CORP. MI.03-1 - DOE Letter; Mott to Farowe; Subject: Velsicol Chemical

170

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Staten Island Warehouse - NY 22  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Staten Island Warehouse - NY 22 Staten Island Warehouse - NY 22 FUSRAP Considered Sites Staten Island Warehouse, NY Alternate Name(s): Archer-Daniels Midland Company NY.22-3 Location: 2393 Richmond Terrace, Port Richmond, New York NY.22-2 Historical Operations: Stored pitchblende (high-grade uranium ore), which was purchased by the MED for the first atomic bomb. NY.22-3 Eligibility Determination: Eligible Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Survey NY.22-5 Site Status: Referred by DOE, evaluation in progess by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. USACE Website Long-term Care Requirements: To be determined upon completion. Also see Documents Related to Staten Island Warehouse, NY NY.22-1 - MED Trip Report Summary; Authors: Ruhoff (Corps of Engineers) and Geddes (Stone & Webster); Subject: Trip to New York;

171

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Metcut Research - US 08  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Metcut Research - US 08 Metcut Research - US 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: METCUT RESEARCH (US.08 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Unknown Evaluation Year: 1991 US.08-1 Site Operations: Site was visited by Feed Materials Production Center representatives. US.08-2 US.08-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication of radioactive materials handled at this site US.08-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None US.08-3 Radiological Survey(s): Radiological Survey(s) Conducted? Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to METCUT RESEARCH US.08-1 - DOE Memorandum; Williams to File; Subject: Elimination of

172

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Trinity Test Site - NM 17  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Trinity Test Site - NM 17 Trinity Test Site - NM 17 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TRINITY TEST SITE (NM.17 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - U.S. Army controls site Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: missile range - 30 miles west of Carrizozo , White Sands , New Mexico NM.17-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 NM.17-1 Site Operations: Detonation of the first atomic bomb occurred at this site. NM.17-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated NM.17-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Fission fragments NM.17-1 Radiological Survey(s): NM.17-1 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - U.S. Army controls site NM.17-1 Also see Documents Related to TRINITY TEST SITE NM.17-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist; Jones to File; Subject:

173

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of Florida - FL 09  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Florida - FL 09 Florida - FL 09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA (FL.09) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to NRC Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Gainesville , Florida FL.09-1 Evaluation Year: 1995 FL.09-1 Site Operations: Research and development using test quantities of radioactive metal. FL.09-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - NRC licensed FL.09-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Test Quantities of Uranium and Plutonium FL.09-2 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to NRC FL.09-2 Also see Documents Related to UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FL.09-1 - DOE Letter; Wagoner to DeLaney; Subject: University of

174

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shpack Landfill - MA 06  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Shpack Landfill - MA 06 Shpack Landfill - MA 06 FUSRAP Considered Sites Shpack Landfill, NY Alternate Name(s): Attleboro, MA Metals and Controls Site Norton Landfill area MA.06-2 MA.06-3 Location: 68 Union Road, Norton, Massachusetts MA.06-2 Historical Operations: No AEC activities were conducted on site. Contamination was suspected from disposal of materials containing uranium and zirconium ash. MA.06-2 MA.06-3 Eligibility Determination: Eligible MA.06-1 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys MA.06-4 MA.06-5 MA.06-6 Site Status: Cleanup in progress by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. MA.06-7 MA.06-8 USACE Website Long-term Care Requirements: To be determined upon completion. Also see Documents Related to Shpack Landfill, NY MA.06-1 - DOE Memorandum; Meyers to Hart; Subject: Shpack Landfill,

175

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of Utah Medical Research  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Utah Medical Research Utah Medical Research Center - UT 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER (UT.02) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Salt Lake City , Utah UT.02-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 UT.02-1 Site Operations: Research and development on animal inhalation of uranium dust during the 1950s. UT.02-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria UT.02-1 UT.02-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium UT.02-2 Radiological Survey(s): Yes UT.02-2 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER UT.02-1 - DOE Letter; Fiore to Schiager; Subject: Elimination of

176

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bakelite Corp - NJ 35  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Bakelite Corp - NJ 35 Bakelite Corp - NJ 35 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Bakelite Corp (NJ 35) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Bound Brook , New Jersey NJ.35-1 Evaluation Year: 1986 NJ.35-1 Site Operations: Processed nickel metal and various chemicals in support of the K-25 plant. No indication that radioactive materials were handled. NJ.35-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication that radioactive material was used at the site NJ.35-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: No Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to Bakelite Corp NJ.35-1 - DOE Checklist/Memorandum; D.Levine to the File; Subject:

177

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-78) (5/9/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 9, 2002 May 9, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-78) David Byrnes - KEWL-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Yakima Basin Side Channels Project, Scatter Creek/Plum Creek Land Acquisition Phase II (modification to DOE/EIS-0265/SA-72). Project No: 1997-051-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 2.15 Acquisition of Sensitive Riparian Resources. Location: Yakima River Basin, Kittitas County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and The Yakama Nation Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to purchase approximately 310 acres of privately-owned

178

DOE Acquisition and Project Management (APM) Glossary of Terms Handbook FINAL VERSION 9-30-2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT GLOSSARY OF TERMS HANDBOOK This handbook provides definitions of acquisition and project management terms commonly used in DOE projects to ensure consistent use of terms in DOE project documents and discussions. DOE APM Glossary of Terms Handbook Final, September 2014

179

DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 440.1B, Worker Protection Management for DOE (Including the National Nuclear Security Administration) Federal Employees  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0.1B 0.1B WORKER PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR DOE (INCLUDING THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES DOE O 440.1B Familiar Level June 2011 1 DOE O 440.1B WORKER PROTECTION MANAGEMENT FOR DOE (INCLUDING THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FAMILIAR LEVEL OBJECTIVES Given the familiar level of this module and the resources listed below, you will be able to answer the following questions: 1. What are the objectives of DOE O 440.1B? 2. What are the requirements that DOE elements must meet according to DOE O 440.1B? 3. What is the hazard prevention/abatement process that must be implemented according to DOE O 440.1B? 4. What are three responsibilities assigned by DOE O 440.1B for heads of field elements?

180

Order Module--DOE O 430.1B, REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

30.1B, REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT 30.1B, REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT Order Module--DOE O 430.1B, REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT "The objective of DOE O 430.1B, Real Property Asset Management, is to establish a corporate, holistic, and performance-based approach to real property life-cycle asset management that links real property asset planning, programming, budgeting, and evaluation to program mission projections and performance outcomes. To accomplish the objective, this Order identifies requirements and establishes reporting mechanisms and responsibilities for real property asset management. This Order implements DOE P 580.1, Management Policy for Planning, Programming, Budgeting, Operation, Maintenance and Disposal of Real Property, dated 5/20/02. DOE Order Self Study Modules - DOE O 430.1B Real Property Asset Management

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the DOE Complex  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Follow-up Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the Department of Energy Complex OVERSIGHT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 3 2.0 STATUS OF DOE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ...................................................... 5 Overall Assessment .......................................................................... 5 Improvements to Emergency Management Programs at DOE Sites Since 1998 .................................................................. 5 Continuing Weaknesses ................................................................... 7 Underlying Causes ...........................................................................

182

Senior Managers' Implementation Guide for Use with DOE O 450.1, Environmental Protection Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides a summary description of environmental management systems (EMSs) for DOE senior managers, including their responsibilities as they apply to the successful implementation of an Integrated Safety Management Systems/EMS and the expected benefits to be derived from such implementation. Canceled by DOE N 251.82.

2004-10-25T23:59:59.000Z

183

NETL: News Release - DOE Advances Oxycombustion for Carbon Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

November 17, 2005 November 17, 2005 DOE Advances Oxycombustion for Carbon Management Promising Carbon Capture Technology Moves Closer to Commercialization WASHINGTON, DC-The Department of Energy has selected two projects to demonstrate "oxycombustion" - a promising carbon capture technology - in existing coal-fired power plants. The projects, valued at nearly $10 million, are expected to help expedite the timeline for commercialization of oxycombustion technology through slip stream or pilot plant testing. In an oxycombustion-based power plant, oxygen rather than air is used to combust a fuel resulting in a highly pure carbon dioxide (CO2) exhaust that can be captured at relatively low-cost and sequestered. No commercial oxygen combustion power plants are operating today, due mainly to the high cost of producing oxygen. Significant reduction in the cost of oxygen compared to today's best cryogenic technology is a key requirement to making the oxycombustion power plant a viable future option. The two projects selected by DOE show promise for reducing those costs when compared to existing CO2 capture systems.

184

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-121): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-121): 2/12/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2003 2, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-121 Murry-Custer No. 1 Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Murry-Custer No.1 transmission line from structure 1/1 through structure 6/2. Corridor width is 125 feet. Location: The project area is located within Snohomish County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of- way, access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridor. Approximately 77.5 acres of right-of-way, 6 miles of access road, and 48 structure sites will be

185

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 61 CHAPTER 3 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR DESIGN RECONSTITUTION This guidance is appropriate for high-hazard facilities expected to operate for an extended period. Since DOE facilities vary in hazard level and circumstances of operation, a graded approach to implementation should be adopted. The implementation guidance is presented in the general sequence in which the design reconstitution (DR) adjunct program is expected to be developed and implemented. Figure 3-1 presents the top- level flowchart for the DR adjunct program. 3.1 PROGRAM PLANS AND PROCEDURES 3.1.1 DESIGN RECONSTITUTION PROGRAM PLAN The DR program plan should address the topics defined in program criterion 1.3.1.1.c. It should be prepared in accordance with direction set forth by the program management element of the CM

186

Order Module--DOE G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDE |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDE Order Module--DOE G 450.4-1B, INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GUIDE This Guide has two purposes. One purpose is to assist DOE contractors in developing, describing, and implementing an ISMS to comply with DOE P 450.4, Safety Management system Policy; DOE P 450.5, Line Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight; DOE P 450.6, Secretarial Policy Statement Environment, Safety and Health; DOE P 411.1, Safety Management FRAM; and the following provisions of the DEAR: 48 CFR 970.5223-1, which requires integration of environment, safety, and health into work planning and execution; 48 CFR 970.5204-2, which deals with laws, regulations, and DOE directives; and 48 CFR 970.1100-1, which requires performance-based contracting.

187

Nuclear Facility Maintenance Management Program Guide for Use with DOE O 433.1B  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The guide provides acceptable approaches for implementing requirements for Nuclear Maintenance Management Programs (NMMPs) set forth in DOE O 433.1B. Cancels DOE G 433.1-1.

2011-09-12T23:59:59.000Z

188

DOE Announces Webinars on Real Time Energy Management, Solar...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Addthis Related Articles DOE Announces Webinars on Natural Gas for Biomass Technologies, Additive Manufacturing for Fuel Cells, and More DOE Announces Webinars on the National...

189

DOE/NNSA Facility Management Contracts Facility Owner Contractor  

Energy Savers [EERE]

FY Competed Parent Companies LLC Partners DOE Site Procurement Director DOE Contracting Officer SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) SC Stanford University...

190

Microsoft Word - Final DOE-CBFO-01-3107 PDP Management Plan_rev...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN Revision 7 November 2014 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office TRU Sites and Transportation Division This document supersedes DOE...

191

Follow-up Review of Emergency Management Programs in the DOE...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

in the event of an accident or emergency. Following a chemical explosion at DOE's Hanford site in May 1997, an independent oversight evaluation of emergency management...

192

Use of Management and Operating or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish policies and procedures for management of DOE, including NNSA, Management and Operating (M&O) and other facility management contractor employees assigned to the Washington, D.C., area. Cancels DOE O 350.2.

2003-10-29T23:59:59.000Z

193

Order Module--DOE O 430.1B, REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

"The objective of DOE O 430.1B, Real Property Asset Management, is to establish a corporate, holistic, and performance-based approach to real property life-cycle asset management that links real...

194

DOE O 243.1B, Records Management Program | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

O 243.1B, Records Management Program DOE O 243.1B, Records Management Program To set forth requirements and responsibilities for creating and preserving records containing adequate...

195

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-79) (5/20/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2002 0, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-79) Joe DeHerrera Fish and Wildlife Project Manager, KEWU-4 Proposed Action: Eisminger/ CREP Dike Relocation Project No: 1992-026-01 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.8 Bank Protection through Vegetation Management, 2.1 Maintain Healthy Riparian Plant Communities, 2.3 Creation of Wetlands to Provide Near Channel Habitat and Store Water for Land Use, 2.7 Avoid Exotic Species, 2.4 Provide Filter Strips to Catch Sediment and Other Pollutants, 6.1 Deferred Grazing. Location: Union County, Oregon

196

(DOE/EIS-0265/SA-102): Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS 1/17/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2003 7, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-102) David Byrnes, KEWL-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Yakima Tributary Access and Habitat Program - Ellensburg Water Company/ Cooke Creek Diversion Project Project No: 2002-025-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.5 Install Grade Control Structures and Check Dams; 1.7 Install Other Habitat Complexity Structures; 1.8 Bank Protection Through Vegetation Management; 1.15 Fish Passage Enhancement - Fishways; 2.1 Maintain Healthy Riparian Plant Communities; 4.10 Water Conveyance - Pipeline; 4.20 Water

197

DOE/EIS-0265-SA-166: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (8/6/04)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2004 6, 2004 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-166) Jay Marcotte Fish and Wildlife Project Manager - KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Idaho Model Watershed Habitat Projects - Coleman Creek Fish Passage Restoration Project No: 2002-025-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.8 Bank Protection through Vegetation Management, 1.9 Structural Bank Protection Using Bioengineering Methods, 1.13 Culvert Removal/Replacement to Improve Fish Passage, 1.16 Spawning Habitat Enhancements, 2.6 Native Seed Inventories, 2.7 Avoid Exotic Species, 2.9 Mechanical Vegetation Removal, 4.2 Water Measuring

198

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-81): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 7/9/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 9,2002 July 9,2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-81) Randy Melzer Redmond Deputy Regional Manager - TFR/REDMOND Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for fifteen Substations in The Dalles District. (See list of facilities under planning step 1). Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes total vegetation management (bare ground) in the electrical substations, and, noxious weed management and maintenance of landscaping within the property boundaries of the listed facilities. These facilities are all located within The Dalles District of the Redmond Region. Analysis: The attached checklist shows the resources that were found during this analysis and what

199

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-74): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 7/1/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2002 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-74) Randy Melzer Redmond Deputy Regional Manager - TFR/REDMOND Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for five Substations in the Malin District. (See list of facilities under planning step 1). Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes total vegetation management (bare ground) in the electrical substations, and, noxious weed management and maintenance of landscaping within the property boundaries of the listed facilities. These facilities are all located within the Malin District of the Redmond Region. Analysis: The attached checklist shows the resources that were found during this analysis and what mitigation measures are required to protect those resources. In addition,

200

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-69) (11/15/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 15, 2001 November 15, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS, (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-69) Linda Hermeston - KEWL Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Improvement of Anadromous Fish Habitat and Passage in Omak Creek Project No: 2000-001-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.6 Install Large Woody Debris Structures; 1.7 Install Other Habitat Complexity Structures; 1.8 Bank Protection Through Vegetation Management; 1.9 Structural bank protection using bioengineering methods; 1.13 Culvert Removal/Replacement to improve fish passage; 1.16 Spawning habitat enhancements; 1.17 Rearing habitat enhancement.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-82): Supplemental Analysis for Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (August 13, 2002)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3,2002 3,2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-82 Jeffrey Hathhorn Redmond Deputy Regional Manager - TFI/IDAHO FALLS Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for twenty-four Substations in the Burley District. See list of facilities under planning step 1). Location: See list of facilities under Planning Step 1. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes total vegetation management (bare ground) in the electrical substations, and, noxious weed management and maintenance of landscaping within the property boundaries of the listed facilities. These facilities are all located within the Burley District of the Idaho Falls Region. Analysis: The attached checklist shows the resources that were found during this analysis and what

202

DOE/EIS-0265-SA-164: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (8/2/04)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2004 , 2004 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-164) Mickey Carter TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager - KEWU-4 Proposed Action: Idaho Model Watershed Habitat Projects - L-9 Irrigation Diversion Modification Project No: 1994-017-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.15 Fish Passage Enhancement - Fishways, 4.1 Irrigation Water Management, 4.2 Water Measuring Devices, 4.23 Intake and Return Diversion Screens, 4.25 Consolidation/Replace Irrigation Diversion Dams Location: Lemhi County, Idaho Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Lemhi Soil and Water Conservation District

203

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-78): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (07/01/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-78) Randy Melzer Redmond Deputy Regional Manager - TFR/REDMOND Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for ten Substations in the Redmond District. (See list of facilities listed under planning step 1). Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes total vegetation management (bare ground) in the electrical substations, and, noxious weed management and maintenance of landscaping within the property boundaries of the listed facilities. These facilities are all located within the Redmond District of the Redmond Region. Analysis: The attached checklist shows the resources that were found during this analysis and what mitigation measures are required to protect those resources. In

204

"DOE O 450.2 INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND DOE P 450.4A INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT POLICY FAMILIAR LEVEL  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

"The familiar level of this module is divided into two sections. In the first section, we will discuss the additions to DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual, which has been...

205

Leaders of DOE Environmental Management Advisory Group to Meet in Henderson  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Leaders of DOE Environmental Management Advisory Group to Meet in Leaders of DOE Environmental Management Advisory Group to Meet in Henderson Leaders of DOE Environmental Management Advisory Group to Meet in Henderson April 6, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Darwin J. Morgan 702-295-3521 morgan@nv.doe.gov Kelly Snyder 702-295-3521 snyderk@nv.doe.gov The Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Site-Specific Advisory Board (SSAB) will meet in Henderson, NV, April 13-14, at Green Valley Ranch located at 2300 Paseo Verde Parkway. Twice each year representatives from the eight local boards of the EM SSAB meet with DOE-EM officials to discuss common issues and concerns. The spring meeting will include a tour of the Nevada National Security Site on April 12 and a day and a half business meeting on Wednesday and

206

Leaders of DOE Environmental Management Advisory Group to Meet in North Las  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Leaders of DOE Environmental Management Advisory Group to Meet in Leaders of DOE Environmental Management Advisory Group to Meet in North Las Vegas Leaders of DOE Environmental Management Advisory Group to Meet in North Las Vegas June 8, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Darwin Morgan 702-295-3521 morgan@nv.doe.gov Kelly Snyder 702-295-3521 snyderk@nv.doe.gov Nevada Site Office News - The Chairs and Vice-Chairs of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Site-Specific Advisory Board (SSAB) will meet in North Las Vegas, Nevada, June 15-16, at Aliante Station Hotel located at 7300 Aliante Parkway. Twice each year representatives from the eight local boards of the EM SSAB meet with DOE-EM officials to discuss common issues and concerns. The spring meeting will include a tour of the Nevada National Security Site

207

DOE/EIS-0285-SA-62: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (4/16/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DATE April 16, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR/Covington SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-62) Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Rocky Reach - Maple Valley No. 1 Transmission Line ROW from structure 98/2 to structure 110/1. The transmission line is a 500 kV line. Location: The ROW is located King County, WA. Proposed by: Snohomish Regional Headquarters, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear targeted vegetation along access roads and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line. BPA plans to conduct vegetation management along existing access road and

208

DOE Publishes New CALiPER Report on Subjective Evaluation of LED PAR38 Lamps  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

DOE has published the first in a series of four special investigations intended to extend the findings of CALiPER Application Summary Report 20: LED PAR38 Lamps, which was published late last year.

209

ORISE: DOE recognizes partnership with ORAU for long-time management of  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE recognizes partnership with ORAU for long-time management of Tennessee DOE recognizes partnership with ORAU for long-time management of Tennessee Science Bowl Annual competition has been managed by ORAU on behalf of DOE since 1991 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Dec. 3, 2012 FY13-03 OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-U.S. Department of Energy ORNL Site Office Manager Johnny Moore recently presented a commemorative plaque to ORAU for its continued support of DOE's Tennessee Science Bowl, an annual competition aimed at encouraging high school students to excel in science and math and to pursue careers in those fields. ORAU, Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Johnny Moore, ORNL Site Office Manager, Tennessee Science Bowl, National Science Bowl, Andy Page, ORAU President, Greg Mills, DOE Program Manager

210

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-41): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 2/27/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 27, 2002 February 27, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-41) William Erickson - TPF/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management around wood poles in Transmission Line ROW's in the Walla Walla Region (see attached checklist for identification). The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridors with the easement width ranging from 0 to 200 feet. Location: The ROWs are located in Walla Walla Region (see checklist). Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation around

211

Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Certifications | U.S. DOE...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management Processes and Procedures Cost & Contingency EDIA Escalation Rates Earned Value Management System (EVMS)...

212

Contract Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contract Management Oak Ridge National Laboratory Site Office (OSO) OSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information...

213

DOE-HDBK-3027-99; DOE Handbook Integrated Safety Management Systems (ISMS) Verification Team Leader's Handbook  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

27-99 27-99 June 1999 DOE HANDBOOK INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ISMS) VERIFICATION TEAM LEADER'S HANDBOOK U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-HDBK-3027-99 iii INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ISMS) VERIFICATION TEAM LEADER' S HANDBOOK FOREWORD This ISMS Verification Team Leader'

214

Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes the framework for an effective worker protection program that will reduce or prevent injuries, illnesses, and accidental losses by providing DOE Federal and contractor workers with a safe and healthful workplace. Cancels DOE O 440.1.

1998-03-27T23:59:59.000Z

215

1,200 To Attend DOE Safety Workshop - Integrated Safety Management (ISM)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1,200 To Attend DOE Safety Workshop - Integrated Safety Management 1,200 To Attend DOE Safety Workshop - Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Workshop Features Nationally Renowned Speakers 1,200 To Attend DOE Safety Workshop - Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Workshop Features Nationally Renowned Speakers September 9, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis KENNEWICK, WASH. - The Department of Energy (DOE) offices at Hanford will host the 2011 Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Champions Workshop at the Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick for DOE and contractor employees from sites across the country on September 12-15. More than 1,200 people are expected to attend the workshop, which features nationally acclaimed keynote speakers and high-level DOE officials. The workshop agenda also includes tours of Hanford, a safety symposium,

216

Regulatory Guidance Letter 86-10 SUBJECT: Special Area Management Plans (SAMPS)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Regulatory Guidance Letter 86-10 SUBJECT: Special Area Management Plans (SAMPS) DATE: October 2 the problems associated with the traditional case-by-case review. Developmental interests can plan the SAMP process as "a comprehensive plan providing for natural resource protection and reasonable coastal

US Army Corps of Engineers

217

DOE Seeks Proposals for Management of New Mexico Waste Isolation Pilot  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Proposals for Management of New Mexico Waste Isolation Proposals for Management of New Mexico Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE Seeks Proposals for Management of New Mexico Waste Isolation Pilot Plant June 20, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor 513-246-0539 william.taylor@emcbc.doe.gov Cincinnati --The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Final Request for Proposal for management and operations of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plan (WIPP) located in Carlsbad, New Mexico. The successful contractor will manage the WIPP site and DOE's National Transuranic Waste (TRU) program. DOE anticipates awarding a competitive, cost-plus-award-fee contract with an approximate value of $135 million per year, for five years. There will be an option to extend the contract for five additional years. The overall mission of the WIPP and the National TRU program is to protect

218

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory July 3, 2008 - 2:15pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of a contractor to manage and operate Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), a DOE Office of Science research facility in Princeton, NJ. PPPL receives approximately $78 million annually from DOE. This is the first competition for a contractor in the history of the laboratory. The RFP describes the criteria DOE will use in selecting a successful future management and operating (M&O) contractor. Key criteria include:

219

DOE Handbook: Guide to good practices for training of technical staff and managers  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Training programs at DOE facilities should prepare personnel to safely and efficiently operate the facilities in accordance with DOE requirements. This guide contains information that can be used to develop or validate training programs for technical staff and managers at DOE nuclear facilities. Training programs based on the content of this guide should provide assurance that these personnel perform their jobs safely and competently.

NONE

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

220

Nuclear Facility Maintenance Management Program Guide for Use with DOE O 433.1B  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The guide provides acceptable approaches for implementing requirements for Nuclear Maintenance Management Programs (NMMPs) set forth in DOE O 433.1B. Cancels DOE G 433.1-1. Admin Chg 1, dated 6-14-13, cancels DOE G 433.1-1A.

2011-09-09T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

NEW - DOE O 350.1 Chg 5, Contractor Human Resource Management Programs  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This directive establishes DOE responsibilities and requirements for the management and oversight of contractor Human Resource Management (HR) programs. Chg 1, 5-8-98; Chg 2, 11-22-09; Chg 3, 2-23-10; Chg 4, 4-29-13. DOE O 350.1 Chg 5, dated 9-30-2014, cancels DOE O 350.1 Chg 4. The Order is revised to reflect the cancellation of Chapters 1-3 due to the incorporation of these chapters into DOE Order 350.3; reflect organizational changes; delete reference to the DOE Retrospective Rating Insurance Plan, which is no longer available; remove the CRD from Chapter VII.

222

Quality Assurance Management System Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830.120 and DOE O 414.1  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

DOE Elements and DOE contractors should consult this Guide in order to develop and implement effective management systems that are consistent with the Department's quality expectations and that support the Safety Management System Policy, DOE P 450.4. Canceled by DOE G 414.1-2A. Does not cancel other directives.

1999-06-17T23:59:59.000Z

223

Guideline to good practices for maintenance management involvement at DOE nuclear facilities  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of the Guideline to Good Practices for Maintenance Management Involvement at DOE Nuclear Facilities is to provide contractor maintenance organizations with information that may be used to verify adequacy of and/or modify existing maintenance management programs, or to develop new programs. This document is intended to be an example guideline for the implementation of DOE Order 4330.4A, Maintenance Management Program, Chapter 2, Elements 14 and 16. DOE contractors should not feel obligated to adopt all parts of this guide. Rather, they should use the information contained herein as a guide for developing maintenance management programs that are applicable to their facility.

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

224

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Norton Co - MA 12  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

the File; Subject: Elimination Recommendation; October 26, 1987 MA.12-4 - AEC Letter; White to Warde; Subject: Thorium Samples; February 19, 1954 MA.12-5 - AEC Memorandum; Morgan...

225

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- American Smelting and Refining...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

to File; Subject: Elimination Recommendation; May 6, 1987 CO.0-01-2 - AEC Letter; Johnson to Wimpfan; Subject: Purchase of ores from LeHigh Coal and Navigation Company from...

226

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of California...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Subject: List of California Sites; May 17, 1989 CA.05-3 - AEC Memorandum; Ball to Smith; Subject: 500 Pounds UO3 - SR-1952; July 10, 1951 CA.05-4 - AEC Memorandum; Blatzs to...

227

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Painesville - OH 48  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

to Quidor; Subject: LOSA Inspection - Metal Scrap OH.48-7 - AEC Memorandum; Maffucci to Smith; Subject: Weekly Report April 20-25; April 27, 1953 OH.48-8 - ORNL Report (ORNL...

228

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Reed Rolled Thread Co -...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Subject: Additional Considered Sites; December 18, 1990 MA.18-3 - National Lead Company of Ohio Letter (extract); To C.L. Karl; Subject: Resume Activities July 1955; August 3, 1955...

229

(DOE/EIS-0265/SA-100): Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS 11/25/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 25, 2002 November 25, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-100) Tracey Yerxa TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager, KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Oregon Fish Screening Project, Screen Replacements 2003 Project No: 1993-066-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.8 Bank Protection; 1.9 Structural Bank Protection using Bio Engineering Techniques; 1.10 Structural Bank Protection using Engineering Structures; 1.14 Reduce Scour and Deposition at Hydraulic Structures; 1.15 Fish Passage Enhancement-Fishways; 1.16 Spawning Habitat Enhancements;

230

(DOE/EIS-0265/SA-88): Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (08/26/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6, 2002 6, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-88) John Baugher, KEWL-4 TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: John Day Watershed Restoration (2002-2003) Project No: 1998-018-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 4.2 Water Measuring Devices; 4.10 Water Conveyance Pipeline; 4.25 Consolidate / Replace Irrigation Diversion Dams; 6.5 Water Supply: Pipeline. Location: Canyon City, Grant County, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon.

231

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-66) (10/4/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

04, 2001 04, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-66) John Baugher - KEW-4 Tom Morse - KEW-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Managers Proposed Action: Water Right Acquisition Program Project No: 2001-023-00 (Fifteenmile Subbasin Water Right Acquisition Program) 1999-008-00 (Columbia Plateau Water Right Acquisition Program) 2001-056-00 (Trout Creek 2001 Streamflow Enhancement) 2001-069-00 (John Day Basin Stream Enhancement Project, Summer 2001) Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 4.18 Purchase / Negotiate Water Right; 4.19 File for Instream Water Right.

232

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-59) (8/14/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

14, 2001 14, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-59) David Byrnes Fish and Wildlife Project Manager - KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Reestablish Safe Access into Tributaries of the Yakima Subbasin, Tucker Creek Fish Passage Project Project No: 98-034-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.15 Fish Passage Enhancement - Fishways/Screening, 1.16 Spawning Habitat Enhancements, 1.17 Rearing Habitat Enhancements, 1.5 Install Grade Control Structures and Check Dams. Location: Tucker Creek, Kittitas County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Yakama Nation Fisheries

233

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-58) 5/31/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

31, 2002 31, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-58) Bill Erickson - TPF/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management at the Lines Creek Microwave site. The proposed work will be accomplished within the fenced area of the facility. Location: The Lines Creek Microwave site is located at SWSW Section 33 T44N R2E within Shoshone County, Idaho, Walla Walla Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes bare ground vegetation management at the microwave site. Bare ground management is needed to prevent fire damage and maintain a vegetation free environment on the site.

234

(DOE/EIS-0265/SA-95): Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS 10/21/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21, 2002 21, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-95) Ron Morinaka (KEWU - 4) TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager, COTR Proposed Action: Libby Creek Channel Stabilization Project Project No: 199500400 Watershed Management Program (See App. A : Available Management Techniques): 1.6 Install Large Woody Debris Structures; 1.7 Install Other Habitat Complexity Structures; 1.9 Structural Bank Protection using Bioengineering Methods; 1.16 Spawning Habitat Enhancements; 1.17 Rearing Habitat Enhancements; 2.1 Maintain Healthy Riparian Plant Communities. Location: On Libby Creek, located about 18 miles southwest of the town of Libby, Montana

235

(DOE/EIS-0265/SA-101): Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management EIS 1/2/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2003 , 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-101) Mark Shaw, KEWU-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Restoration of Anadromous Fish Access to Hawley Creek Project No: 2001-052-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 4.18: Purchase / Negotiate Water Right Location: Lemhi, Lemhi County, Idaho Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Lemhi Soil and Water Conservation District, with the cooperation of the Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to fund a project to enhance fish habitat on

236

DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Po DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Po "DOE and its contractors are required to perform management and independent assessments in accordance with: * Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 830, Subpart A, "Quality Assurance Requirements"; * DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance;

237

DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Po DOE G 414.1-1B: Management and Assessments Guide for Use with 10 CFR Part 830, Subpart A, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance; DOE M 450.4-1, Integrated Safety Management System Manual; and DOE O 226.1A, Implementation of Department of Energy Oversight Po "DOE and its contractors are required to perform management and independent assessments in accordance with: * Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 830, Subpart A, "Quality Assurance Requirements"; * DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance;

238

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mexican Hat Mill Site -...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

at Mexican Hat, Utah. This site is managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Final Site Observational Work Plan for the UMTRA Project Site at Mexican...

239

DOE Announces 2008 Federal Energy and Water Management Awards...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

improving operations and maintenance practices and upgrading building management and heating, ventilating, and air conditioning equipment, including recommissioning energy...

240

DOE-STD-1075-94; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-94 5-94 July 1994 DOE STANDARD STANDARD FOR DEVELOPING AND ISSUING DOE SAFETY GUIDES AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDES U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94018438 DOE-STD-1075-94 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) standard was prepared by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health with the assistance of James E. Konklin of

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

242

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory July 10, 2006 - 2:57pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximately $1.58 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). Fermilab is a major DOE Office of Science single program research facility located on 6,800 acres approximately 45 miles west of Chicago, Illinois. "Fermilab is a world leader in high energy physics, which helps the U.S.

243

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-120): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEISq 2/10/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2003 0, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-120 Hanford-Ostrander Corridor Maintenance William Erickson TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Hanford-Ostrander Transmission Line Corridor from Tower 10/4 to Tower 17/2 + 770. The line is a 500kV Single Circuit Transmission Line having an easement width of 300 feet. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor as referenced on the attached checklist. Location: The subject right-of-way is located in Benton County, WA. In the Walla Walla Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA).

244

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-119): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 1/29/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2003 9, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-119 Snohomish-Murray No. 1 Transmission Line Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Snohomish-Murray No. 1 Transmission Line from structure 2/6 through structure 18/6. Right of way width is 95 feet. Location: The project area is located within Snohomish County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of- way, access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridor. Total right-of-way acreage is approximately 182.8 acres. Approximately 17 miles of access roads will

245

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-28)(9/5/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

September 5, 2001 September 5, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-28) James Jellison - TFO/Olympia Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Port Angeles - Sappo No.1 Transmission Line ROW, from struture 1/1 to structure 42/10. Location: The ROW is located in Clallum County, WA, all in the Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Olympia Region. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line. BPA plans to conduct vegetation control with the goal of removing tall growing vegetation that is

246

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-122): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 2/19/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CSB-2 CSB-2 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-122- Bonneville-Alcoa Ed Tompkins, TFO/LMT Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Bonneville-Alcoa 115kV transmission line Location: The project is located in the BPA Olympia Region in Skamania and Clark Counties, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of- way, along access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridor that may impede the operation and maintenance of the identified transmission lines. All work will be in accordance with the National Electrical Safety Code and BPA standards. BPA plans

247

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-127): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 2/19/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

KEP/4 KEP/4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-127- Eugene-Alvey#2 Benjamin Tilley - TFE/Alvey Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Eugene-Alvey 115 kV transmission line from structure 7/1 through structure 12/2m, and along portions of the following adjacent transmission lines: Hawkins-Alvey 115KV and Alvey-Lane 115KV. Location: The project is located in the BPA Eugene Region in Lane County, Oregon. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of- way, access roads, and around tower structures of the subject transmission line corridor that may impede the operation and maintenance of the identified transmission lines. BPA plans to

248

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-57): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 4/10/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2002 0, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/Z992 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-57) Jim Jellison - TFO/Olympia Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Trojan-Allston Transmission Lines 1 & 2 ROW between 1/1 and 9/1. The lines are 230 kV Single Circuit Transmission Lines having an easement width of 125 feet. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor. Location: The ROW is located in Columbia County, OR, being in the Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of- ways and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject

249

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-75): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (06/21/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June June 21, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/Z-992 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA- 75-Ross-Lexington. Jim Jellison -- - TFO/Olympia Ed Tompkins -- - TFO/Ross Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Ross Lexington Transmission Line. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove danger trees as well as unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways, along access roads and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line. See Section 1.4 of the attached checklist for a complete description of the proposed action. Analysis: Please see the attached checklist for the resources present. Applicable findings and mitigation measures are discussed below. Planning Steps: 1. Identify facility and

250

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-103): Supplemental Analysis for Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (August 12, 2002)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/Z992 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-103-Keeler-Pennwalt). Jim Jellison - TFO/Olympia Ed Tompkins - TFO/Ross Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Keeler-Pennwalt transmission line and parts of the St. John-Keeler, Rivergate-Keeler, Keeler-Oregon City, & St. John-St. Helens lines. Location: Washington and Multnomah Counties, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to clear targeted vegetation within the Right-of-Ways along access roads and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line. See Section 1.4 of the attached checklist for a complete description of the proposed action. Analysis: See the attached checklist for the

251

(DOE/EIS-0285-126): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program 2/19/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

KEP-4 KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-126- Alvey Fairview Benjamin Tilley - TFE/Alvey Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Alvey Fairview 230kV transmission line from structure 1/1 through structure 64/7. Location: The project is located in the BPA Eugene Region in Coos, Douglas, and Lane Counties, Oregon. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of- way, along access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridor that may impede the operation and maintenance of the identified transmission lines. BPA plans to conduct vegetation control with the goal of removing tall growing vegetation that is currently

252

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-105): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (08/22/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA 105 Elbe Tap to Alder-LaGrande No. 1 James Jellison - TFO/Olympia Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Elbe Tap to Alder-LaGrande No.1 and 115kV transmission line from structure 1/1 through structure 7/17. Corridor width varies. The project area is located within Whatcom County, Washington. Location: Transmission line is located at and west of Elbe, Pierce County Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of-way, access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridor. The right-of-way will be treated using selective and non-selective methods that include hand cutting, mowing

253

(DOE/EIS-0285-SA-100): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 8/15/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 5, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-100) Joe Johnson Natural Resource Specialist TFS/Kalispell Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Libby-Conkelly, 1/2 to 26/4 Transmission Line ROW. The line is a 230kV Double Circuit Transmission Line having an easement width of 125 feet to 250 feet. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor. Location: The ROW is located in both Lincoln and Flathead County, MT, being in the Spokane Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line. All work will be in

254

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-22)(8/17/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

August 17, 2001 August 17, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-22) Donald F. Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Chief Joseph - Snohomish No.3 and 4 Transmission Line ROW. From STR 94/1 to STR 113/1 Location: The ROW is located in King and Snohomish Counties, WA, in the Snohomish Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line. BPA plans to conduct vegetation control with the goal of removing tall growing vegetation that is

255

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-23)(8/17/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DATE: August 17, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-23) Donald F. Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Schultz - Raver No.1 and 2 from 60/3 to 75/5 and the Olympia - Grand Coulee from 70/2 to 70/5 Transmission Line ROW's. Location: The ROW is located in King County, WA, in the Snohomish Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways, around tower structures, and along access roads that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line. All work will be executed in accordance with the National Electrical Safety

256

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-26)(9/11/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11, 2001 11, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-26) Ben Tilley - TFE/Alvey Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management on Reedsport-Fairview #1 Transmission Line Structure 1/5 to 39/4. Location: All ROW are located in Coos and Douglas Counties, OR, all being in the Eugene Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Eugene Region. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line. BPA plans to conduct vegetation control with the goal of removing tall growing vegetation that is currently

257

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-07): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 4/18/01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

18, 2001 18, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-07) Bill Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management on section of three ROWs. The ROWs include selected sections of the McNary Powerhouse, the present and proposed new sections of the McNary-Roundup and the McNary Switchyard South Transmission lines. Location: All ROW are located east Umatilla, OR., all being in the Walla Walla Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of- ways and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject

258

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-17)(7/24/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DATE: July 24, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-17) Donald F. Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along selected sections of the Schulz - Raver No.1, 2, 3 & 4, Olymplia - Grand Coulee NO. 1 Transmission Line ROW's. Location: The ROW's are located in Pierce and King Counties, WA, in the Snohomish Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line. All work will be executed in accordance with the National Electrical Safety Code and BPA

259

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-55): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 4/12/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2002 2, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR/Covington SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-55) Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Raver - Paul No. 1 Transmission Line ROW from structure 15/5 to 29/3. The transmission line is a 500 kV line. Location: The ROW is located Pierce County, WA. Proposed by: Snohomish Regional Headquarters, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of- ways and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission line, including both Reclaim and Danger Trees. Also, access road clearing will be

260

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Titus Metals - IA 04  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to TITUS METALS IA.04-1 - Argonne National Laboratory Memorandum; Lonergan to Novak; Subject: Extrusion of Billets,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Picatinny Arsenal - NJ 31  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Also see Documents Related to PICATINNY ARSENAL NJ.31-1 - AEC Memorandum; Klevin to Harris; Subject: Lathe Machining of Uranium at Picatinney Arsenal, Dover, New Jersey; January...

262

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Brush Beryllium Co - Clevland...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Company, Cleveland, Ohio; November 14, 1985 OH.02-3 - AEC Memorandum; Hershman to Smith; Subject: Transmittal of Monthly Progress Report for December; December 22, 1952....

263

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Niagara Falls Storage Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of the Niagara Falls, New York, Storage Site NY.17-1 - AEC Memorandum; Malone to Smith; Subject: Monthly Progress Report for April; April 24, 1951. Attachment: Tonawanda...

264

[6450-01-P], DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 10 CFR Part 830, Nuclear Safety Management, AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing a final rule regarding Nuclear SafetyManagement. This Part establishes requirements for the safe management of DOE contractor andsubcontractor work at the...

265

Technical Assistance Guide: Working with DOE National Laboratories (Brochure), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Energy Management Energy Management Program (FEMP) facilitates the Federal Government's implementa- tion of sound, cost-effective energy management and investment practices to enhance the nation's energy security and environmental stewardship. To advance that mission, FEMP fosters collaboration between Federal agencies and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratories. 1 This guide outlines technical assistance capabilities and expertise at DOE national laboratories. Any laboratory assistance must be in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 35.017 requirements and the laboratory's designation as Federal Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) facilities. Contacts and core expertise for each DOE national laboratory are listed in

266

Technical Assistance Guide: Working with DOE National Laboratories (Brochure), Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Energy Management Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) facilitates the Federal Government's implementa- tion of sound, cost-effective energy management and investment practices to enhance the nation's energy security and environmental stewardship. To advance that mission, FEMP fosters collaboration between Federal agencies and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratories. 1 This guide outlines technical assistance capabilities and expertise at DOE national laboratories. Any laboratory assistance must be in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 35.017 requirements and the laboratory's designation as Federal Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) facilities. Contacts and core expertise for each DOE national laboratory are listed in

267

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

of Science who spearheaded the project management of the new 68.5 million Spallation Neutron Source Instruments - Next Generation project at Oak Ridge Lab, completing the project...

268

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pinellas Plant General Electric...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Protection FACT SHEET Location of the Pinellas County, Florida, Site Office of Legacy Management Pinellas County, Florida, Site This fact sheet provides information about...

269

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shiprock Mill Site - NM...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Evaluation of the Trench 2 Groundwater Remediation System at the Shiprock, New Mexico, Legacy Management Site March 2009 Supplement to the Baseline Risk Assessment of Ground Water...

270

DOE Names New Richland Operations Manager | Department of Energy  

Energy Savers [EERE]

groundwater. Addthis Related Articles EM Office of River Protection (ORP) Manager Kevin Smith, right, discusses the Low-Activity Waste Facility design and construction with Waste...

271

Maintenance at DOE Legacy Management Sites Weldon Spring...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

addressed by ICs. The site management plan establishes the entire program for postclosure care. It should reference administrative systems that support protectiveness, such as...

272

Management Alert: DOE/IG-0906 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

may not possess adequate controls for identifying and handling certain electric grid-related information that could pose threats to national security. Management...

273

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Lawrence Berkeley National...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of Energy for a wide range of energy related research activities. The Office of Science is the Department of Energy landlord for the Laboratory. The Environmental Management...

274

Operations Program Management (OPM) Homepage | U.S. DOE Office...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Information Operations Program Management U.S. Department of Energy SC-33Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-8429 F: (301)...

275

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hallam Nuclear Power Facility...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

was successfully conducted on April 29, 2009. The inspectio FACT SHEET Office of Legacy Management Location of the Hallam Decommissioned Reactor Hallam, Nebraska,...

276

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Canonsburg Industrial Park...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Package-October 2008 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling FACT SHEET Office of Legacy Management Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, Disposal Site Project Plan: Ground Water...

277

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Ambrosia Lake Mill Site...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Surveillance Plan (LTSP) for the Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico Site. FACT SHEET Office of Legacy Management Ambrosia Lake, New Mexico, Disposal Site This fact sheet provides...

278

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maybell Mill Site - CO 0...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Colorado (UMTRCA Title I) Disposal Site Moffat County, Colorado April 2008 Office of Legacy Management Historical documents may contain links which are no longer valid or to...

279

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Albany - OR 01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Survey of the Albany Metallurgical Research Center United States Bureau of Mines Biomass Facility and the Back Forty Area, Albany, Oregon; June 1983 OR.01-8 - DOE Report...

280

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nellis Air Force Base -...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of the Defense InstallationsFacilities; Number 13. NV.04-3 - DOE Letter; Church to Rohlof; Disposal of Liquid Radioactive Waste -- Nellis Air Force Base; September 1, 1983...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Acting Assistant Secretary for DOE Office of Environmental Management...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

provide for the badge, and for safety reasons you are required to wear over-the-ankle boots with a substantial sole and pants or slacks (i.e., no shorts or skirts). Who: DOE...

282

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of Arizona Southwest...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

of the University of Arizona under FUSRAP; October 13, 1987 AZ.01-4 - DOE Letter; Bauer to Liverman; Past Operations and a Survey by Messrs, Jascewsky, and Smith; February 7, 1978...

283

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-67) (10/4/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2001 4, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-67) Jay Marcotte Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Install Fish Screens to Protect ESA Listed Steelhead and Bull Trout in the Walla Walla Basin. Project No: 2001-039-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 1.15 Fish Passage Enhancement - Fishways. Location: Various Walla Walla River Basin Irrigation Diversions, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the Walla Walla County Conservation District. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA is proposing to provide cost share for a program that

284

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-71) (10/29/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29, 2001 29, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-71) Alan Ruger Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Duncan Creek Channel Rehabilitation Project Project No: 2001-053-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 1.11 Remove Debris Functioning as Barrier to Passage, 1.16 Spawning Habitat Enhancements, 2.1 Maintain Healthy Riparian Plant Communities, 2.9 Mechanical Vegetation Control. Location: Skamania County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), and the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)

285

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-04): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 3/27/01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 27, 2001 March 27, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-04) Elizabeth Johnson - TFR/The Dalles Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management on Ponderosa - Pilot Butte 18/2 to 18/4 Relocation Location: The project area is in the City of Bend, OR, in Deschutes County. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation from a section of BPA's Ponderosa - Pilot Butte Transmission Line Right-of-way to facilitate relocation of structure 18/3. Work would begin in mid-March and end in April, 2001. Analysis: 1. Description of right-of-way and vegetation management needed: The project involves

286

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-63) (9/17/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2001 7, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-63) Joe DeHerrera Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Pelican Creek Crossing Improvement Project No: 1992-026-01 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 1.13 Culvert Removal/Replacement to Improve Fish Passage. Location: Pelican Creek, Union County, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program (GRMWP), and the Union County Public Works Department (UCPWD) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA provides funds to the Grande Ronde Model Watershed

287

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-70) (10/23/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23, 2001 23, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KECN-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-70) David Byrnes - KEWL-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Yakima Basin Side Channels Project, Scatter Creek/Plum Creek Land Acquisition Phase I. Project No: 1997-051-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 2.15 Acquisition of Sensitive Riparian Resources. Location: Yakima River Basin, Kittitas County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Yakama Nation Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to purchase 4 privately owned parcels totaling

288

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-68)(10/12/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

12, 2001 12, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-68) Joe DeHerrera Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Mill Creek and Little Creek Crossing Improvement Project No: 1992-026-01 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 1.13 Culvert Removal/Replacement to Improve Fish Passage. Location: Mill Creek and Little Creek, Union County, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program (GRMWP), and the Union County Public Works Department (UCPWD) Description of the Proposed Action: BPA provides funds to the Grande Ronde Model Watershed

289

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-56): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 4/9/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

09, 2002 09, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-56) 2ULRQ $OEUR 2O\PSLD 5HJLRQDO 0DQDJHU Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the following electric yards located in the Ross District: Cape Horn North Bonneville Stevenson Carson Underwood Troutdale Cascade Locks Acton Ross 345kV and J.D. Alcoa Sifton St. Johns Ostrander McLoughlin Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to maintain a weed-free environment in the electrical substations located within the Olympia Region's Ross District. Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to manage vegetation inside and around electrical

290

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-72)(12/3/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December 3, 2001 December 3, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-72) David Byrnes - KEWL-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Yakima Basin Side Channels Project, Scatter Creek/Plum Creek Land Acquisition Phase II. Project No: 1997-051-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 2.15 Acquisition of Sensitive Riparian Resources. Location: Yakima River Basin, Kittitas County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and The Yakama Nation Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to purchase 2 privately owned parcels

291

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-08): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 4/23/01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

23, 2001 23, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS DOE/EIS-0285/SA-08 Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Clearing C-trees along the south side of the right-of-way. Location: Raver - Covington Line 1, between towers 6/5 and 7/2. Work will be performed in the State of Washington. Proposed by: BPA Snohomish Region. Analysis: This project meets the standards and guidelines for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision (ROD). Planning Steps 1. Identify facility and the vegetation management need. The project involves controlling all tall growing trees (C-Trees) within the right-of-way. All

292

Supplement Analysis for the Watrshed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-75) (2/20/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20, 2002 20, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-75) Peter Lofy - KEWL-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Gourlay Creek Fish Ladder Project Project No: 2001-038-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 1.15 Fish Passage Enhancement - Fishways. Location: Columbia County, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the City of Scappoose Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to fund the construction of a fish passage facility at the Gourlay Creek Dam/water reservoir in Columbia County, Oregon. The City of

293

Contract Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contract Contract Management Fermi Site Office (FSO) FSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Fermi Site Office U.S. Department of Energy MS 118 P.O. Box 2000 Kirk Road and Pine Street Batavia, IL 60510 P: (630) 840-3281 F: (630) 840-3285 Contract Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The FSO Business and Contract Support Team implements the timely execution of all Fermi Research Alliance management and operating contract modifications and oversees initiatives for effective administration of Laboratory procurement, property, human resources, budget, accounting and financial management, internal audit, industrial relations, and Contractor performance requirements under the contract. The Team interacts regularly

294

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Wyckoff Steel Co - NJ 20  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Also see Documents Related to Wyckoff Steel Co NJ.20-1 - AEC Memorandum; Breslin to Harris; Subject: Uranium Rod Drawing Test at Wyckoff Steel Co.; September 12, 1950 NJ.20-2 -...

295

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Texas City Chemicals Co...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Texas City Chemicals, Inc.) Texas City, Texas; Circa 1985 TX.02-3 - AEC Memorandum; Johnson to Strauss; Subject: Texas City Chemicals, Incorporated; November 18, 1953 TX.02-4 -...

296

Microsoft Word - DOE-CBFO-01-3107 PDP Management Plan_Final  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

CBFO-01-3107 CBFO-01-3107 PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN Revision 6 June 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the National TRU Program This document supersedes DOE/CBFO-01-3107, Revision 5 DOE/CBFO-01-3107 Revision 6 PDP Management Plan June 2013 2 Performance Demonstration Program Management Plan DOE/CBFO-01-3107 Revision 6 June 2013 Approved By: //signature on file// Date: 6-14-13 Office Director Office of the National TRU Program Concurred By: //signature on file// Date: 6-14-13 Office Director Office of Quality Assurance Prepared By: //signature on file// Date: 6-14-13 PDP Appointee Office of the National TRU Program DOE/CBFO-01-3107 Revision 6 PDP Management Plan June 2013

297

What difference does a robot make? managing ambiguity in distributed knowledge work  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

What difference does robotic telepresence make to the management of ambiguity in distributed knowledge work? We examined this question in a post-surgical intensive care where remote medical workers struggled to coordinate ...

Beane, Matthew I. (Matthew Ian)

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

Various Project Management Reports | U.S. DOE Office of Science...  

Office of Science (SC) Website

903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Processes and Procedures Various Project Management Reports Print Text Size: A A A FeedbackShare Page Government Accountability Office (GAO)...

299

Assessing the Potential for Renewable Energy Development on DOE Legacy Management Lands  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Legacy Management Legacy Management DOE/GO-102008-2435 February 2008 Assessing the Potential for Renewable Energy Development on DOE Legacy Management Lands Puerto Rico Alaska Assessing the Potential for Renewable Energy Development on DOE Legacy Management Lands Authors: Doug Dahle, Dennis Elliott, Donna Heimiller, Mark Mehos, Robi Robichaud, Marc Schwartz, Byron Stafford, and Andy Walker Published by National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by the Midwest Research Institute * Battelle DOE/GO-102008-2435 February 2008 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

300

Seventh annual DOE LLWMP participants' information meeting. DOE Low-Level Waste Management Program. Abstracts  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The following sessions were held: International Low-Level Waste Management Activities; Low-Level Waste Disposal; Characteristics and Treatment of Low-Level Waste; Environmental Monitoring and Performance; Greater Confinement and Alternative Disposal Methods; Low-Level Waste Management; Corrective Measures; Performance Prediction and Assessment; and Siting New Defense and Commercial Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities.

Not Available

1985-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Data Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Data Management Data Management Biological and Environmental Research (BER) BER Home About Research Research Abstracts Searchable Archive of BER Highlights External link Biological Systems Science Division (BSSD) Climate and Environmental Sciences Division (CESD) ARM Climate Research Facility Atmospheric System Research (ASR) Program Data Management Earth System Modeling (ESM) Program William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) Integrated Assessment of Global Climate Change Regional & Global Climate Modeling (RGCM) Program Subsurface Biogeochemical Research Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration External link Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Facilities Science Highlights Benefits of BER Funding Opportunities Biological & Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC)

302

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hamilton_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio Ohio Hamilton, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Hamilton Map Background-The Hamilton, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-Intermittently from 1943 to 1951, the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company fabricated slugs from rolled natural uranium metal stock for use by the Manhattan Engineer District and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission in production reactors. In 1994, DOE designated the Hamilton Site for remediation under FUSRAP. DOE remediated areas of contamination identified on surfaces and in floor drains in the interior of the building in 1994 and 1995. DOE certified that

303

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Toledo_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio Ohio Toledo, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Toledo Map Background-The Toledo, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-During the early and mid-1940s, Baker Brothers, Inc., fabricated slugs from natural uranium metal for the Manhattan Engineer District. In 1992, DOE designated the Toledo Site and its associated vicinity property for remediation under FUSRAP. DOE remediated localized areas of residual uranium contamination on interior building surfaces and exterior soil and concrete in 1995. DOE certified that the site and the vicinity property complied with applicable cleanup criteria and standards in 2001

304

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective July 2, 2012 - 3:03pm Addthis Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Former Associate Deputy Secretary

305

DOE Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage Their  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage DOE Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage Their Energy Consumption DOE Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage Their Energy Consumption May 22, 2012 - 2:12pm Addthis Department of Energy Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage Their Energy Consumption Smart Grid Data Access Awards Will Demonstrate How Consumers and Communities Can Benefit from Better Energy Information The Department of Energy announced phase I awards totaling nearly $3.2 million that will encourage utilities, local governments, and communities to create programs that empower consumers to better manage their electricity use through improved access to their own electricity consumption data. These projects will complement the Apps for Energy

306

DOE to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory DOE to Compete Contract for Management and Operation of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory February 16, 2006 - 11:55am Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today that it intends to seek competitive bids for the management and operations contract for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, Washington. The current five-year contract expires September 30, 2007. "The competitive process is the best method to provide the American taxpayer an optimum management team for PNNL, one of our outstanding national laboratories," Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director of the DOE Office of Science, said. Battelle Memorial Institute, a non-profit organization based in Columbus,

307

DOE Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage Their  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage DOE Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage Their Energy Consumption DOE Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage Their Energy Consumption May 22, 2012 - 2:12pm Addthis Department of Energy Announces Nearly $3.2 Million to Help Consumers Better Manage Their Energy Consumption Smart Grid Data Access Awards Will Demonstrate How Consumers and Communities Can Benefit from Better Energy Information The Department of Energy announced phase I awards totaling nearly $3.2 million that will encourage utilities, local governments, and communities to create programs that empower consumers to better manage their electricity use through improved access to their own electricity consumption data. These projects will complement the Apps for Energy

308

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective Walking the Walk: Making DOE Management and Operations More Efficient and Effective July 2, 2012 - 3:03pm Addthis Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Beth Tomasoni was part of a team from the Office of Management that included Richard Leotta and John Harris who improved diversity and inclusion in procurement by ensuring that more than 70% of contract work by dollar amount went to small businesses. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Melvin G. Williams, Jr. Former Associate Deputy Secretary

309

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS and the Hood River Fisheries Project Final EIS(DOE/EIS-0241) (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-62) (9/14/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2001 4, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-62) and the Hood River Fisheries Project Final EIS (DOE/EIS-0241). Thomas Morse Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Hood River Fish Habitat Project Project No: 1998-021-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.16 and 1.17 Spawning and rearing habitat enhancements; 2.1 Maintain healthy riparian plant communities; 4.9 Water conveyance: ditch and canal lining; 4.23 Intake and return diversion screens; 1.13 Culvert removal and replacement. Location: Odell, Hood River County, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Confederated Tribes of the Warms

310

Contract Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contract Contract Management SLAC Site Office (SSO) SSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information SLAC Site Office U.S. Department of Energy Bldg 41, M/S 08A 2575 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 P: (650) 926-2505 Contract Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page SLAC Site Office (SSO) communicates and enforces contract requirements; reviews and approves contract performance and deliverables, and provides Contracting Officer direction and guidance to the SLAC National Accelerator Center (SLAC). SSO provides support for all contract, business operations and administrative matters. SSO reviews, approves and oversees business operations and administrative systems such as budget; financial management;

311

Contract Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contract Contract Management Princeton Site Office (PSO) PSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Contact Information Princeton Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 102 Princeton, NJ 08543 P: (609) 243-3700 F: (609) 243-2032 Contract Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The Princeton Site Office oversees the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory renown as a world-class fusion energy research laboratory dedicated to developing the scientific and technological knowledge base for fusion energy as a safe, economical and environmentally attractive energy source for the world's long-term energy requirements. Princeton University manages PPPL, which is part of the national laboratory system funded by the U.S. Department of Energy through the Office of

312

Information Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Information Management Information Management Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Services Information Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Integrated Support Center information management professionals are an integral part of the Science Information Technology Modernized Organization. Staff in the ISC collaborate closely with the Site Offices and the SC Chief Information Officer to ensure federal staff in the field have the right products and services to efficiently fulfill the mission.

313

Reservation Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Reservation Management Reservation Management Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Services Reservation Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Related Links Emergency Information The Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Reservation is home to a world-leading research and manufacturing park, with major federal programs in the areas of science, environmental management, energy efficiency, nuclear energy, and national security. In addition to its role as the SC

314

Presentations from the 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Please see below for copies of the presentations given at the the 2012 Department of Energy Project Management Workshop on April 3 & 4, 2012. Permission to post has not been recceived for some...

315

ORAU Wins DOE Facility Management Contractor Small Business Achievemen...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

On June 12, 2014, at the US Department of Energy's Small Business Forum in Tampa, FL, the Oak Ridge Associated Universities won the FY 2013 Facility Management Contractor Small...

316

DOE/NNSA Strategic Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) FOR MANAGEMENT...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Services Pantex, LLC Contract Number: DE-AC54-00AL66620 Performance period: October 01, 2013 through September 30, 2014 J D. Woolery P e dent and General Manager B cock & Wilcox...

317

DOE ZERH Webinar: Quality Management Systems for ZERH  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Description:The session will provide background and guidance for how Zero Energy Ready Home builders can integrate a quality management program in their business. The focus will be on facilitating...

318

DOE-STD-1073-93-Pt. 1; DOE Standard Guide for Operational Configuration Management Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

II-A-1 II-A-1 DOE-STD-1073-93 APPENDIX lI-A DESIGN CONTROL Design controls are the measures established to assure that the design process activities are carried out in a planned, orderly, correct, and documented manner. These controls assure the quality of the design requirements and design basis obtained through the design process. Design controls are constraints to the design process that ensure the following results: the correct identification of design inputs and constraints; the design analysis and calculations are complete and correct; and the design outputs are complete and consistent with the design basis. Design controls are implemented through procedures. DOE 5700.6C, Quality Assurance, defines DOE design control requirements. ANSI/ASME NQA-1, Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants, provides additional guidance on design

319

Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Establishes the framework for an effective worker protection program that will reduce or prevent accidental losses, injuries, and illnesses by providing DOE Federal and contractor workers with a safe and healthful workplace. Chg 1, 10-26-95; Chg 2, 10-26-96.

1995-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

320

DOE/EIS-0285/SA-101: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS Spokane Region (9/13/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

13, 13, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-101) Spokane Region Michael F. Brock - TFS/BELL-1 Regional Manager, Spokane Region Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for Substations and Non-Electric Facilities (See Attachment A for a complete list of facilities) Location: Spokane Region. (See Attachment A) Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to manage vegetation inside and around electrical substations and associated facilities. Vegetation management within the substation shall include the bare ground management of all graveled areas. These areas shall primarily be maintained with the use of herbicides. The management of vegetation outside the substation and associated facilities shall include: 1) bare

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Contract Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Contract Contract Management Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Current Projects Contract Management Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Contract Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The beginnings of this Laboratory are rooted in the history of the Hanford Site and its evolution over time, from a production effort, to a Cold War deterrent, evolving to support the Hanford Site's environmental remediation efforts to its current missions of national security, energy and environmental and nuclear science. The Laboratory has served each one of these missions over the course of the Laboratory's history. This

322

Quality Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Quality Management Quality Management Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Services Quality Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The ISC provides quality assurance expertise to the Office of Science's site offices in support of their federal oversight of the national laboratories. Effective quality assurance (QA) programs are essential for achieving a high level of efficiency and excellence in the design, construction, operation and maintenance of laboratory facilities, and in

323

Subject: References:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Subject: Subject: References: DEAR 970.3102-2 Compensation for personal services DEAR 970.5204-13 Allowable costs and fixed-fee (Management and operating contracts) DEAR 970.5204-14 Allowable costs and fixed-fee (support contracts) When is this ~\.cquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective 10 days from the date of issuance. This gui~ce supersedes any previous statutory cap on executive compensation. Existing contracts need to be reviewed to determine whether contract terms and conditions are consistent with the guidance in this AL, or whether contract modifications are necessary. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remain;; in effect until superseded or canceled. Whom do you Contact for More Information? Contact the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, for questions pertaining to the

324

DOE-STD-1155-2002; Transportation and Traffic Management Functional Area Qualification  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1155-2002 September 2002 DOE STANDARD TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1155-2002 This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1155-2002 i APPROVAL

325

DOE-STD-1181-2004; Facility Maintenance Management Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1181-2004 March 2004 DOE STANDARD FACILITY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1181-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1181-2004 ii

326

DOE-HDBK-1114-98; Guide to Good Practices for Line and Training Manager Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-98 4-98 June 1998 Superseding DOE-STD-1056-93 February 1993 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR LINE AND TRAINING MANAGER ACTIVITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Order No. DE98003917 DOE-HDBK-1114-98 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE Components and

327

Various Project Management Reports | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Various Project Management Reports Various Project Management Reports Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management Processes and Procedures Department of Energy Office of Science Various Project Management Reports Cost & Contingency EDIA Escalation Rates Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Certifications Awards Lessons Learned Tools & Resources SC Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Processes and Procedures Various Project Management Reports Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Government Accountability Office (GAO) GAO-10-199, DOE: Actions Needed to Develop High-Quality Cost

328

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Seymour_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Connecticut Connecticut Seymour, Connecticut, Site FUSRAP Site Seymour Map Background-The Seymour, Connecticut, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-Research and development of a natural uranium metal extrusion process was performed at the Seymour Site for AEC from 1962 to 1964. Operations resulted in contamination of interior surfaces of one building and two soil areas. DOE designated the site for remediation under FUSRAP in 1985 and conducted remediation in 1992 and 1993. In 1994, DOE certified that the site complied with applicable cleanup criteria and released the property for unrestricted

329

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Los Alamos Underground Med Pipelines -  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Los Alamos Underground Med Los Alamos Underground Med Pipelines - NM 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Los Alamos Underground Med Pipelines ( NM.02 ) Eliminated - Remedial action being performed by the Los Alamos Area Office of the DOE Albuquerque Operations Office Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Los Alamos County Industrial Waste Lines NM.02-1 Location: Los Alamos , New Mexico NM.02-1 Evaluation Year: 1986 NM.02-1 Site Operations: From 1952 to 1965, underground pipelines or industrial waste lines were used at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory to transport liquid wastes from Technical Areas 1, 3, 48, and 43 to a chemical waste treatment plant (Technical Area 45). NM.02-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Remedial action being performed by another DOE office NM.02-1

330

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ColumbusEast_FUSRAP  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Columbus East, Ohio, Site Columbus East, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Columbus East Map Background-The Columbus East Site in Columbus, Ohio, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-At the Columbus East Site uranium metal was heated and extruded into rods for the Manhattan Engineer District, contaminating building surfaces, drains, equipment, exterior soils, and manholes in nearby streets. The owner removed contamination from site facilities and equipment after extrusion activities ceased in 1943. DOE conducted additional remediation of contaminated areas under FUSRAP in 1996. DOE certified that applicable

331

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Beverly_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Massachusetts Massachusetts Beverly, Massachusetts, Site FUSRAP Site Beverly Map Background-The Beverly, Massachusetts, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-From 1942 to 1948, the Metal Hydrides Corporation, which became the Ventron Corporation in 1965, conducted uranium processing operations that converted uranium oxide to uranium metal powder and uranium metal for the Manhattan Engineer District. The Beverly Site was later used by another private company for the purification of thorium compounds. In 1986, DOE designated the site for remediation under FUSRAP. DOE

332

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fairfield_FUSRAP  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Ohio Ohio Fairfield, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Fairfield Map Background-The Fairfield, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-In 1956, uranium metal was machined and shaped at the site for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, contaminating interior building surfaces, drains, equipment, and soils. The former owner removed some contamination in late 1956. DOE conducted additional remediation at the property under FUSRAP in 1994 and 1995. Supplemental limits were applied to uranium in the soil beneath the building floor slab. DOE certified that applicable cleanup criteria had

333

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oxford_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Ohio Ohio Oxford, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Oxford Map Background-The Oxford, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-Uranium metal machining at the Oxford Site from 1952 to 1957 for AEC resulted in contamination of the site and several nearby (vicinity) properties, all of which are privately owned. AEC removed some contamination at the site in 1957. DOE conducted additional remediation of the site and the vicinity properties under FUSRAP in 1994 and 1995. DOE certified that the site conformed to applicable cleanup criteria in 1996 and released all properties for unrestricted use.

334

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- NewYork_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

New York, New York, Site New York, New York, Site FUSRAP Site New York Map Background-The New York, New York, Site, in Manhattan, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The New York Site was used by the Manhattan Engineer District in the early 1940s for the short-term storage of uranium concentrates that were later distributed to government facilities involved in nuclear reactor and atomic weapons programs. In 1990, DOE designated the site for remediation under FUSRAP. DOE remediated contaminated areas in the warehouses and certified that the site complied with applicable cleanup criteria and standards in 1995. The

335

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fairfield_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Fairfield, Ohio, Site Fairfield, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Fairfield Map Background-The Fairfield, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-In 1956, uranium metal was machined and shaped at the site for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, contaminating interior building surfaces, drains, equipment, and soils. The former owner removed some contamination in late 1956. DOE conducted additional remediation at the property under FUSRAP in 1994 and 1995. Supplemental limits were applied to uranium in the soil beneath the building floor slab. DOE certified that applicable cleanup criteria had

336

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Springdale_FUSRAP  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Springdale, Pennsylvania, Site FUSRAP Site Springdale Map Background-The Springdale, Pennsylvania, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Springdale Site was a privately owned metal fabrication shop that provided uranium metal machining services to the Manhattan Engineer District the mid-1940s. As a result, interior concrete floor surfaces and soil under the concrete slab were contaminated with uranium. In 1992, DOE designated the site for remediation under FUSRAP and remediated the contamination in 1994. DOE certified that the site complied

337

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Springdale_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Springdale, Pennsylvania, Site FUSRAP Site Springdale Map Background-The Springdale, Pennsylvania, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Springdale Site was a privately owned metal fabrication shop that provided uranium metal machining services to the Manhattan Engineer District the mid-1940s. As a result, interior concrete floor surfaces and soil under the concrete slab were contaminated with uranium. In 1992, DOE designated the site for remediation under FUSRAP and remediated the contamination in 1994. DOE certified that the site complied

338

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Shippingport Atomic Power Plant - PA  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Shippingport Atomic Power Plant - Shippingport Atomic Power Plant - PA 13 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SHIPPINGPORT ATOMIC POWER PLANT (PA.13 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP. Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Duquesne Light Company PA.13-1 Location: 25 miles west of Pittsburgh in Beaver County , Shippingport , Pennsylvania PA.13-2 Evaluation Year: circa 1987 PA.13-3 Site Operations: First commercially operated nuclear power reactor. Joint project (Federal Government an Duquesne Light Company) to demonstrate pressurized water reactor technology and to generate electricity. Plant operated by Duquesne Light Company under supervision of the Office of the DOE Deputy Assistant Secretary for Naval Reactors -- 1957 to October 1982. PA.13-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority. DOE chartered Major Project #118, Shippingport Station Decommissioning Project completed cleanup in 1989. PA.13-1

339

Providing Innovative Waste Management Disposition for the DOE Complex  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2005 2005 Operational Benefits of Using Dedicated Trains To Transport Spent Fuel To Yucca Mountain Presented by: Joe Grumski Dedicated Trains Dedicated Trains On Monday, July 18th, 2005, DOE distributed its new "Department of Energy Policy Statement for Use of Dedicated Trains for Waste Shipments to Yucca Mountain." Under this policy DOE will use dedicated train service - train service dedicated to one Commodity - for its rail transport of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste to the Yucca Mountain Repository site in Nevada. Dedicated Trains Dedicated Trains Why Dedicated Trains? *Safety *Security *Economics *Rail Logistics and Scheduling Why Dedicated Trains Safety * Direct transit reduces the time the packages are in transit as compared to regular train

340

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Argonne National Laboratory Argonne National Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Argonne National Laboratory April 19, 2006 - 10:23am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximated $2.54 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), a DOE Office of Science multi-program research facility located near Chicago, Illinois. "Argonne lab contributes expert scientists and unique leadership in basic research, which helps the U.S. maintain our global competitiveness," said Office of Science Director, Dr. Raymond L. Orbach. "Through this contracting process, DOE seeks the best possible management of this

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

2014 DOE Project Management Workshop Meeting the Challenge-Integrated...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

and Project Management 8:05 - 8:45 James Webb Space Telescope: PM Lessons Applied Eric Smith, Deputy Program Director, NASA 8:45 - 9:00 9:00 - 9:45 Victor Carter-Bey (PMI) 9:45 -...

342

DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site DOE Selects Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC to Manage and Operate its Savannah River Site January 10, 2007 - 10:24am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS), LLC has been selected as the management and operating contractor for DOE's Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina. The contract is a cost-plus award-fee contract valued at approximately $800 million per year and is for a five-year base period with the option to extend it for up to five additional years. SRNS is a limited liability corporation consisting of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., and Newport News

343

DOE Announces Winners of 2010 Federal Energy and Water Management Awards |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Announces Winners of 2010 Federal Energy and Water Management DOE Announces Winners of 2010 Federal Energy and Water Management Awards DOE Announces Winners of 2010 Federal Energy and Water Management Awards October 7, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy today announced that more than 30 individuals, teams and organizations across the Federal Government were selected to receive Federal Energy and Water Management Awards for outstanding and innovative efforts to implement sustainable strategies that improve energy, water, and vehicle fleet efficiency. These awards demonstrate the commitment by Federal agencies to invest in efficiency measures that save money for taxpayers, reduce carbon pollution, and create a stronger economy for the American people. The 31 initiatives receiving awards today saved taxpayers almost $42 million in energy and water costs

344

Manage Your Grant | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Manage Your Manage Your Grant Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) EPSCoR Home About Current Awards How to Apply Manage Your Grant Recent News SBIR/STTR Home BES Home Contact Information Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research U.S. Department of Energy SC-22/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-9830 F: (301) 903-9513 E: sc.epscor@science.doe.gov More Information » Manage Your Grant Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page All DOE EPSCoR awardees are required to report periodically on progress in meeting their projects objectives in accordance with 10 CFR Part 605.19 Continuation Funding and Reporting Requirements. Standard reporting requirements for DOE's Office of Science (SC) are set forth on SC's Grants

345

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bettis Atomic Power Laboratories - PA  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Bettis Atomic Power Laboratories - Bettis Atomic Power Laboratories - PA 44 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Bettis Atomic Power Laboratories (PA.44 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Allegheny County , West Mifflin , Pennsylvania PA.44-1 Evaluation Year: Circa 1987 PA.44-2 Site Operations: Conducted activities directed toward the design, development, testing, and operational follow of nuclear reactor propulsion plants for Naval surface and submarine vessels. PA.44-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Active DOE facility PA.44-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radioactive Materials Associated with Reactor Operation PA.44-3 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated

346

DOE model conference on waste management and environmental restoration  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Reports dealing with current topics in waste management and environmental restoration were presented at this conference in six sessions. Session 1 covered the Hot Topics'' including regulations and risk assessment. Session 2 dealt with waste reduction and minimization; session 3 dealt with waste treatment and disposal. Session 4 covered site characterization and analysis. Environmental restoration and associated technologies wee discussed in session 5 and 6. Individual papers have been cataloged separately.

Not Available

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

Environmental Management Performance Report to DOE-RL September 2001  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide the Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (RL) a monthly summary of the Central Plateau Contractor's Environmental Management (EM) performance by Fluor Hanford (FH) and its subcontractors. Section A, Executive Summary, provides an executive level summary of the cost, schedule, and technical performance described in this report. It summarizes performance for the period covered, highlights areas worthy of management attention, and provides a forward look to some of the upcoming key performance activities as extracted from the contractor baseline. The remaining sections provide detailed performance data relative to each individual Project (e.g., Waste Management, Spent Nuclear Fuels, etc.), in support of Section A of the report. Unless otherwise noted, the Safety, Conduct of Operations, and Cost/Schedule data contained herein is as of July 31, 2001. All other information is updated as of August 22, 2001 unless otherwise noted. ''Stoplight'' boxes are used to indicate at a glance the condition of a particular area. Green boxes denote on schedule. Yellows denote behind schedule but recoverable. Red is either missed or unrecoverable, without agreement by the regulating party.

EDER, D.M.

2001-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-36): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (01/22/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

24, 2002 24, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-38) Benjamin J. Tilley - TFE/Alvey Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Wendson-Tahkenith #1 & #2 1/1-20/4, Tahkenitch-Gardiner #1/1-2/3 and Tahkenitch-Reedsport #1/1-4/2 Transmission Line ROW's. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor with and average corridor width of 100 feet. Location: The ROW is located in Douglas and Lane County, OR, being in the Eugene Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways

349

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-43): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 2/27/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

February 27, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-43) William T. Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Lower Monumental - McNary 57/2 to 63/5, and Radar Tap 0/4 to 0/10 Transmission Line ROW's. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor with and average corridor width of 165 and 80 feet respectively. Location: The ROW is located in Umatilla and Franklin County, OR, being in the Walla Walla Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways

350

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA 150 East Ellensburg Tap  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 2003 5, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA 150 East Ellensburg Tap Tom Murphy Natural Resource Specialist - TFS/Bell-1 Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the East Ellensburg Tap, 1/6 to 3/19 Transmission Line ROW. The line is a 115 kV Single Circuit Transmission Line with no easement width. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor. Location: The ROW is located in Kittatas County, WA being in the Spokane Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways and around transmission line structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the

351

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-06): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 4/13/01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4/13/01 4/13/01 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-06) Bill Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management of annual weeds on seven acres of Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) owned pastureland at the Walla Walla Substation. Location: The pastureland is adjacent to the Walla Walla Substation and is located east and north of the fenced substation, all within the BPA property boundary. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to apply selected herbicides to control annual weeds that are competing with native grasses that were seeded two years ago. Herbicides will also

352

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-25)(9/5/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5, 2001 5, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/Z992 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-25) Elizabeth Johnson - TFR/The Dalles Jim Jellison - TFO/Olympia Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along selected ROW sections of the Ostrander-Pearl transmission line. The ROWs include sections of the Ostrander-Pearl 500 kV line; the Ostrander-McLoughlin 500 kV line; the Big Eddy-Chemawa 230 kV line and the Big Eddy- McLoughlin 230 kV line. Location: The ROW is located in Clackamas County, Oregon, within the Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights- of-way and around tower structures that may impede the operation and maintenance of the

353

DOE/EIS-0285-SA-50: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission Vegetation Management Program FEIS (3/15/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2/27/01 1 2/27/01 1 United States Government Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration DATE: March 15, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-50) Elizabeth Johnson - TFR/The Dalles Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management on Grizzly-Summerlake (Structures 102/1-104/2) and Grizzly-Captain Jack (Structures 103/1-140/4) Transmission Line Corridors. Location: The project area lies east and northeast Klamath Falls, OR, and is located in Lake and Klamath Counties, Redmond Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation from the rights of

354

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-52): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (03/22/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22, 2002 22, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-52) Elizabeth Johnson - TFR/The Dalles Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management on the Ashe-Marion #2 (138/1-150/2), Buckley- Marion (12/1-24/2), McNary-Santiam (109/1-119/3), and John Day-Marion (49/4-50/5) Transmission Line Corridors. Location: The project area lies between Maupin and Pine Grove Oregon, and is in the Redmond Region. The project area begins at on the Ashe-Marion at structure 138/1 and terminates at Wapinitia Road, Pine Grove. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation from the

355

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-20)(8/2/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2001 2, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-20) Bill Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla - Natural Resource Specialist Jim Jellison - TFO/Olympia - Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the McNary-Ross 161/1 to 166/5+346 Transmission Line ROW. The line is a 345kV Single Circuit Transmission Line having an easement width of 175 feet. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor. Location: The ROW is located in Clark County, WA, being in the Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways

356

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-37): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 1/17/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

17, 2002 17, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR/Covington SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-37) Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Bob Sweet - TFNF/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Monroe-Custer No.1 Transmission Line ROW from 29/1+915 to 45/4+975. The transmission line is 500 kV single circuit transmission line. Project includes adjacent Monroe-Custer No.2 and Arlington-Bellingham single circuit transmission lines having a combined ROW width of 421.5 feet. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor. Location: The ROW is located in Snohomish and Skagit Counties, WA. Proposed by: Snohomish Regional Headquarters, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA).

357

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285-SA-33)(11/27/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 27, 2001 November 27, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/Z992 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS- 0285/SA-33) Bill Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Jim Jellison - TFO/Olympia Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the St Helens-Allston Transmission Line ROW. The line is a 115 kV Single Circuit Transmission Line having an easement width of 100 feet. Location: The ROW is located in Columbia County, OR, being in the Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear danger trees from varying widths of the indicated transmission line right-of-way that are approaching electrical clearance zones in accordance

358

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-37): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 1/17/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

17, 2002 17, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEPR/Covington SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-37) Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Bob Sweet - TFNF/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Monroe-Custer No.1 Transmission Line ROW from 29/1+915 to 45/4+975. The transmission line is 500 kV single circuit transmission line. Project includes adjacent Monroe-Custer No.2 and Arlington-Bellingham single circuit transmission lines having a combined ROW width of 421.5 feet. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor. Location: The ROW is located in Snohomish and Skagit Counties, WA. Proposed by: Snohomish Regional Headquarters, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA).

359

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-59): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 4/19/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 19, 2002 April 19, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-59) James Jellison - TFO/Olympia Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Chehalis Covington/ Raver Paul / Paul Alston 230 and 500 kV Transmission line Corridor ROW 48/2 to 70/6 and 1/1 to 13/4. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor with a corridor width of 250 to 442 feet. Location: The ROW is located in Thurston County, WA, being in the Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-ways

360

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-27): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 6/28/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

June 28, 2002 June 28, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-27) Ron Morinaka, KEWU-4 Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Abbot Creek Fish Barrier Project (Hungry Horse Mitigation / Habitat Improvements) Project No: 1991-19-03 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): 8.2 Control of Predators and Nuisance Animals Location: Kalispell, Flathead County, Montana Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to fund a fishery enhancement project where a fish passage barrier will be installed in Abbot Creek to remove introduced rainbow trout

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-34) (12/3/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3, 2001 3, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/Z992 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-34) Bill Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Jim Jellison - TFO/Olympia Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the McNary-Ross Transmission Line ROW between 152/3+2120 to 153/4. The line is 345 kV Single Circuit Transmission Line (project includes adjacent N. Bonneville-Ross 230 kV Single Circuit Transmission Line) having a combined easement width of 300 feet. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor. Location: The ROW is located in Skamania County, WA, being in the Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA).

362

EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-18) Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS 10/17/01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DATE: October 17, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0246/SA-18) Charlie Craig - KEWU Fish and Wildlife Project Manager Proposed Action: Eugene Wetlands Acquisition Phase II Project No: 1992-059-00 Wildlife Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Wildlife Mitigation Program EIS): Resource Acquisition Techniques - 1.1 Fee- Title Acquisition, 1.2 Easement Acquisition. Location: Lane County, Oregon Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and The Nature Conservancy Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to fund the acquisition and preservation of approximately 99 acres of native wet prairie and oak woodland habitat in Lane County, Oregon.

363

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-123): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 2/20/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

20, 2003 20, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-123 Malin-Hilltop Elizabeth Johnson - TFR/The Dalles Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management on Malin-Hilltop (Structures 20/5-29/1). Location: The project area lies to the southeast of Klamath Falls, OR, and is located in Modoc County, California. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administrationn (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: Trees are located under and adjacent to conductors. Should a fire occur, these trees are a hazard to the line and could cause serious damage to the conductors, resulting in significant problems for the transmission grid. BPA plans on

364

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-27): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 10/22/01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

October 22, 2001 October 22, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-27) Ben Tilley - TFE/Alvey Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Marion-Alvey #1 from structure 14/5 to 64/3 and the Marion-Lane #1 from structure 14/5 to 70/2. Both lines describe the same segment of ROW between structures 14/5 and 45/2. Location: All ROW are located in Marion, Linn, and Lane Counties, OR, all being in the Eugene Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Eugene Region. Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of- ways, around tower structures, and associated access roads that may impede the operation and

365

DOE-STD-4001-2000; Design Criteria Standard for Electronic Records Management Software Applications  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4001-2000 4001-2000 March 2000 DOE STANDARD DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD FOR ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS U.S. Department of Energy AREA INFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-4001-2000 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy Standard is approved for use by all DOE Components and their Contractors. The Heads of the DOE Components may issue supplementary instructions when

366

DOE-STD-1180-2004; Construction Management Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1180-2004 March 2004 DOE STANDARD CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1180-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

367

DOE-STD-1175-2003; Senior Technical Safety Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT DOE-STD-1175-2003 December 2003 DOE STANDARD SENIOR TECHNICAL SAFETY MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1175-2003 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 605-6000.

368

DOE-STD-1177-2004; Emergency Management Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1177-2004 January 2004 DOE STANDARD EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1177-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

369

DOE-STD-1178-2004; Technical Program Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

78-2004 78-2004 February 2004 DOE STANDARD TECHNICAL PROGRAM MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1178-2004 i This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1178-2004

370

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Inhalation Toxicology Research  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Inhalation Toxicology Research Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute - 020 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute (020) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This facility is owned by the Department of Energy and is located on land the U. S. Air Force leases to the Department of Energy. The Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office¿s Environmental Management program has performed the clean-up activities at this facility. The clean-up activities were completed in 1996. Albuquerque Operations Office is currently performing monitoring and surveillance which is expected to

371

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sandia National Laboratories - New  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

New New Mexico - 018 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Sandia National Laboratories - New Mexico (018) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: This site is a Department of Energy multi-program national laboratory with research and development programs in a broad range of scientific and technical fields. The Department of Energy Albuquerque Operation Office's Environmental Management program is responsible for assessing and cleaning up environmental contamination at Sandia that has occurred from a wide variety of historical activities. The National Nuclear Security Administration is the site landlord and will be responsible for Long Term

372

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Gen_Atomics  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

General Atomics Hot Cell Facility, California, Site General Atomics Hot Cell Facility, California, Site This Site All Sites All LM Quick Search Key Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents General Atomics Hot Cell Facility, California, Site Fact Sheet Please be green. Do not print these documents unless absolutely necessary. Request a paper copy of any document by submitting a Document Request. All Site Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Fact Sheet Environmental Assessment Other Documents Fact Sheet General Atomics Hot Cell Facility, California, Site Fact Sheet December 12, 2011 Environmental Assessment Final Environmental Assessment for Decontaminating and Decommissioning the General Atomics Hot Cell Facility DOE/EA-1053 August 1995 Other Documents

373

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Berkeley_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

California California Berkeley, California, Site FUSRAP Site Berkeley Map Background-The Berkeley, California, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-Gilman Hall is a four-story building on the campus of the University of California, Berkeley. Floors, wood sills, walls, and baseboards in the building were contaminated by radioactive materials during the 1940s while conducting research on the production and chemical properties of plutonium performed in support of the Manhattan Engineer District and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. DOE designated the site for remediation under FUSRAP in 1979. Lawrence

374

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Granite2_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Illinois Illinois Granite City, Illinois Site FUSRAP Site Granite Map Background-The Granite City Site, located in Granite City, Illinois, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-In the late 1950s and early 1960s, two federal government-owned betatron particle accelerators were used at the Granite City Site to x-ray uranium metal ingots for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission to check the quality of the metal and to detect metallurgical flaws before fabrication and machining were performed. In 1992, DOE designated the site for remediation under FUSRAP. Several

375

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Maryland Disposal Site - MD 05  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Maryland Disposal Site - MD 05 Maryland Disposal Site - MD 05 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MARYLAND DISPOSAL SITE (MD.05 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Baltimore - Vicinity , Maryland MD.05-1 Evaluation Year: 1989 MD.05-1 Site Operations: Proposed disposal site - never developed. MD.05-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to MARYLAND DISPOSAL SITE MD.05-1 - Report (DOE/OR/20722-131 Revision 0); Site Plan for the Maryland Disposal Site; April 1989 Historical documents may contain links which are no longer valid or to

376

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Transcontinental Machine and Tool Co -  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Transcontinental Machine and Tool Transcontinental Machine and Tool Co - US 06 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TRANSCONTINENTAL MACHINE AND TOOL CO. (US.06 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Unknown US.06-1 Evaluation Year: 1990 US.06-1 Site Operations: Metal Fabrication operations - Machined Uranium slugs in support of Savannah River program for evaluation of Uranium fabrication methods. US.06-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Based on similar AEC/MED machine shops' surveys with low potential for contamination - did not exceed DOE guidelines US.06-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium US.06-1 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP

377

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Albany_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Oregon Oregon Albany, Oregon, Site FUSRAP Site albany Background-The Albany, Oregon, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Albany Site is owned by the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Metallurgical research was conducted at this site for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the Energy Research and Development Administration from 1948 to 1978. Activities involving radioactive thorium and uranium resulted in contamination of buildings, equipment, and soils. The U.S. Bureau of Mines remediated portions of the site from 1948 to 1978. DOE conducted additional remediation of buildings, equipment, and soils

378

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Heppanstall Co - PA 19  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Heppanstall Co - PA 19 Heppanstall Co - PA 19 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Heppanstall Co. (PA.19 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Tippens Inc. PA.19-1 Location: 4620 Hatfield Street , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania PA.19-4 Evaluation Year: 1987 PA.19-2 Site Operations: Forged approximately 100,000 pounds of uranium during a six month period in 1955. PA.19-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote. Radiological screening survey results indicate radiation levels well below DOE guidelines. Conditions at site meet applicable requirements - No further investigation of site necessary. PA.19-1 PA.19-4 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium PA.19-3

379

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Madison_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Illinois Illinois Madison, Illinois, Site FUSRAP Site Madison Map Background-The Madison Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-During the late 1950s and early 1960s, the Dow Metal Products Division of Dow Chemical Company machined and shaped uranium metal and straightened uranium rods for AEC. Radiological surveys conducted in 1989 identified uranium dust on interior overhead surfaces that exceeded DOE guidelines. The site was designated for remedial action under FUSRAP in 1992. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) completed remediation in

380

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Adrian_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Michigan Michigan Adrian, Michigan, Site FUSRAP Site adrian Background-The Adrian Site in Adrian, Michigan, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Adrian Site was operated by Bridgeport Brass Company in the 1950s. Uranium metal was extruded at the site for use in the fabrication of fuel elements for production reactors. General Motors Corporation remediated radioactive contamination at the site in the 1970s and additional remediation was conducted under FUSRAP in 1995. Final Conditions-Supplemental limits were applied to residual radioactive material left in the piping system, and DOE released the site for use

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Laboratory - OH 19  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Mound Laboratory - OH 19 Mound Laboratory - OH 19 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Mound Laboratory (OH.19) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Mound, Ohio, Site Documents Related to Mound Laboratory LEGAL NOTICE for Mound Site 2011 CERCLA Five-Year Review Third Five-Year Review for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio. LMS/MND/S07963. September 2011 5-Year OU-1 Remedy Five-Year Review Report Second Five-Year Review for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio September 2006 Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional Controls Applied to the Former DOE Mound Site Property. LMS/MND/S06401.

382

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- International Rare Metals Refinery Inc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Rare Metals Refinery Rare Metals Refinery Inc - NY 38 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: International Rare Metals Refinery, Inc. (NY.38 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Canadian Radium and Uranium Corporation NY.38-1 Location: 69 Kisko Avenue , Mt. Kisko , New York NY.38-1 NY.38-3 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.38-4 Site Operations: Manufactured and distributed radium and polonium products. NY.38-5 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - Site was a commercial operation not under the jurisdiction of DOE predecessor agencies NY.38-2 NY.38-4 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radium, Plutonium NY.38-5 Radiological Survey(s): Yes NY.38-1 NY.38-5 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP

383

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Wayne_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

New Jersey New Jersey Wayne, New Jersey, Site FUSRAP Site Wayne Map Background-The Wayne, New Jersey, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-Rare Earths, Inc. and then W.R. Grace and Company operated the 6.5-acre site as a rare earth and thorium processing facility from 1948 to 1971. Contaminated waste materials were buried on site and the facility license was terminated. DOE acquired the property for interim storage of contaminated soil and debris removed from nearby (vicinity) properties. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency listed the site on the National

384

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- American Manufacturing Co of Texas -  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Manufacturing Co of Texas Manufacturing Co of Texas - TX 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: American Manufacturing Co of Texas - TX 08 ( TX.08 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: North Sylvania Ave. , Fort Worth , Texas TX.08-1 Evaluation Year: Circa 1995 TX.08-1 TX.08-2 Site Operations: Specialized tube elongation and billet piercing tests on Uranium metal for the AEC. TX.08-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Based upon the results of a radiological survey of the property - No radionuclide concentrations or exposure levels above DOE Guidelines TX.08-1 TN.08-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium TN.08-1 Radiological Survey(s): Yes TX.08-1 TX.08-2

385

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fairmont Chemical Co - NJ 25  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Fairmont Chemical Co - NJ 25 Fairmont Chemical Co - NJ 25 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fairmont Chemical Co. (NJ.25 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Newark , New Jersey NJ.25-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NJ.25-1 Site Operations: Company was a commercial chemical company identified as a rare earths processor (hafnium). NJ.25-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NJ.25-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to Fairmont Chemical Co. NJ.25-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist; Wallo to File; Fairmont Chemical

386

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fort St Vrain - 011  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Fort St Vrain - 011 Fort St Vrain - 011 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fort St Vrain (011) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Fort St. Vrain Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation is located in Weld County, Colorado. In 1965, the U.S. Atomic Energy (a predecessor agency to DOE) agreed to provide permanent storage for a large portion of the Fort St. Vrain¿s spent nuclear fuel. Originally, Fort St. Vrain was a nuclear power generating facility that operated from 1976 to 1989. In 1989, the nuclear power plant was decommissioned and the plant was converted to a natural gas power plant.

387

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- St Louis Airport Site Vicinity  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

St Louis Airport Site Vicinity St Louis Airport Site Vicinity Properties - 017 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: St. Louis Airport Site Vicinity Properties (017) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: These properties are located in Hazelwood and Berkeley, Missouri, approximately 15 miles northwest of downtown St. Louis. The properties are associated with the St. Louis Airport Site. The Manhattan Engineer District (MED), a predecessor agency of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), acquired the St. Louis Airport Site in 1946. The site was operated by the MED and the Atomic Energy Commission (the successor agency to the MED and a

388

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Indianorchard_FUSRAP  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Massachusetts Massachusetts Indian Orchard, Massachusetts, Site FUSRAP Site Indian Orchard Map Background-The Indian Orchard Site, located in Indian Orchard, Massachusetts, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Indian Orchard Site is privately owned. Interior surfaces of a building at this site were contaminated in 1948 by machining uranium metal for the Manhattan Engineer District and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission to support Brookhaven National Laboratory defense-related projects. DOE designated the site for remediation under FUSRAP in 1992. Remediation

389

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Osborne Co - OH 34  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Osborne Co - OH 34 Osborne Co - OH 34 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: OSBORNE CO. ( OH.34 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Cleveland , Ohio OH.34-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 OH.34-1 Site Operations: Metal Fabrication Operations - Research/Development and Testing - Uranium Metal. OH.34-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Limited scope of activities performed - potential for contamination considered remote OH.34-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium OH.34-1 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to OSBORNE CO. OH.34-1 - Memorandum/Checklist; A. Wallo to the File; Subject:

390

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Electro Circuits Inc - CA 08  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Electro Circuits Inc - CA 08 Electro Circuits Inc - CA 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Electro Circuits, Inc. (CA.08 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 401 East Green Street , Pasadena , California CA.08-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 CA.08-2 Site Operations: Conducted ultrasonic tests on uranium ingots in the early 1950s. CA.08-3 CA.08-4 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote based on limited operations at the site CA.08-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium Metal CA.08-3 Radiological Survey(s): No Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to Electro Circuits, Inc. CA.08-1 - AEC Memorandum; Parsegian to Musser; Subject: Transfer of

391

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sharples Corp - PA 29  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Sharples Corp - PA 29 Sharples Corp - PA 29 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SHARPLES CORP. (PA.29 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 201 Spring Garden Street , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania & Philadelphia , Pennsylvania PA.29-2 PA.29-1 Evaluation Year: 1986 PA.29-1 Site Operations: Producer/broker of special chemicals - major MED supplier. PA.29-2 PA.29-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication that radioactive materials were used on the site PA.29-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: No Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to SHARPLES CORP. PA.29-1 - Memorandum/Checklist; D. Levine to the File; Subject:

392

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Colonial Uranium Co - CO 10  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Colonial Uranium Co - CO 10 Colonial Uranium Co - CO 10 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Colonial Uranium Co. (CO.10 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Grand Junction , Colorado CO.10-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 CO.10-2 Site Operations: Processed thorium concentrates for commercial market at another site. AEC purchased small quantity (100 lbs) for testing. CO.10-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - Commercial operation CO.10-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Thorium CO.10-1 Radiological Survey(s): No Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to Colonial Uranium Co. CO.10-1 - AEC Memorandum; Faulkner to Sapirie; Subject: Testing of

393

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- R Brew Co - NH 01  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

R Brew Co - NH 01 R Brew Co - NH 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: R. BREW CO. (NH.01 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Concord , New Hampshire NH.01-1 Evaluation Year: 1994 NH.01-2 Site Operations: Conducted vacuum furnace tests using uranium and copper billets. NH.01-1 NH.01-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NH.01-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium NH.01-1 NH.01-3 Radiological Survey(s): Yes - radiological monitoring during operations NH.01-3 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to R. BREW CO. NH.01-1 - Memorandum/Checklist; Landis to File; Subject: R. Brew

394

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tracerlab Inc - MA 11  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Tracerlab Inc - MA 11 Tracerlab Inc - MA 11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TRACERLAB, INC. (MA.11 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 130 High Street , Boston , Massachusetts MA.11-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 MA.11-3 Site Operations: Research and development regarding uranium irradiation and cesium blocks during the early 1950s. MA.11-1 MA.11-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - NRC licensed MA.11-2 MA.11-3 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium, Cesium MA.11-1 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to TRACERLAB, INC. MA.11-1 - Tracerlab Letter; Epple to Mason; Subject: Steps to Secure

395

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fansteel Metallurgical Corp - IL 16  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fansteel Metallurgical Corp - IL 16 Fansteel Metallurgical Corp - IL 16 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fansteel Metallurgical Corp. (IL.16 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Chicago , Illinois IL.16-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 IL.16-3 Site Operations: Sole producer and supplier of tantalum and columbium metals to the MED. IL.16-1 IL.16-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No radioactive materials handled at this site IL.16-2 IL.16-3 Radioactive Materials Handled: No Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None IL.16-2 Radiological Survey(s): No Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to Fansteel Metallurgical Corp. IL.16-1 - MED Memorandum; Greninger to the File; Subject: Visit to

396

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Beryllium Corp - PA 39  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Beryllium Corp - PA 39 Beryllium Corp - PA 39 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: BERYLLIUM CORP. (PA.39 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Brush Beryllium PA.39-1 Location: Reading , Pennsylvania PA.39-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 PA.39-1 Site Operations: Production of Beryllium circa late 1940s - 50s. PA.39-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No radioactive material handled at this site, only Beryllium PA.39-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: No PA.39-1 Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to BERYLLIUM CORP. PA.39-1 - Memorandum/Checklist; D. Levine to the File; Subject:

397

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Swenson Evaporator Co - IL 23  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Swenson Evaporator Co - IL 23 Swenson Evaporator Co - IL 23 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: SWENSON EVAPORATOR CO. (IL.23 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Harvey , Illinois IL.23-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 IL.23-1 Site Operations: Scheduled a raffinate spray drying test that was later cancelled. IL.23-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication that radioactive materials were handled at this site IL.23-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to SWENSON EVAPORATOR CO. IL.23-1 - Memorandum/Checklist; D.Levine to the File; Subject:

398

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Navy Ammunition Depot - NJ 15  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Navy Ammunition Depot - NJ 15 Navy Ammunition Depot - NJ 15 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NAVY AMMUNITION DEPOT (NJ.15) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DOD Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Earle, New Jersey NJ.15-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NJ.15-2 Site Operations: Storage facility and disposal unit for drummed radioactive waste that was dumped at sea. NJ.15-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Referred to DOD NJ.15-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radioactive Waste Materials NJ.15-2 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DOD NJ.15-2 Also see Documents Related to NAVY AMMUNITION DEPOT NJ.15-1 - AEC Memorandum; Piccot to the Files; Subject: Visit to

399

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bethlehem Steel Corporation - NY 02  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Bethlehem Steel Corporation - NY 02 Bethlehem Steel Corporation - NY 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION (NY.02 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Lackawanna , New York NY.02-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 NY.02-2 Site Operations: Conducted high temperature alpha-phase rolling tests on uranium metal in the 1950s. NY.02-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria NY.02-5 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium NY.02-3 Radiological Survey(s): Yes NY.02-4 NY.02-5 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP NY.02-6 Also see Documents Related to BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION NY.02-1 - Bethlehem Steel Corp. Letter; Subject: Completed Access

400

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rocky Mountain Research Laboratories -  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Rocky Mountain Research Rocky Mountain Research Laboratories - CO 06 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH LABORATORIES (CO.06 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 1020 Yuma Street , Denver , Colorado CO.06-1 Evaluation Year: Circa 1987 CO.06-3 Site Operations: Processed beryllium on a pilot scale. CO.06-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication of radioactive materials handled at the site CO.06-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: No Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP CO.06-2 Also see Documents Related to ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH LABORATORIES CO.06-1 - Rocky Mountain Research Letter; Burton to Smith; Subject:

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Humphreys Gold Co - FL 08  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Humphreys Gold Co - FL 08 Humphreys Gold Co - FL 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Humphreys Gold Co. (FL.08 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Jacksonville , Florida FL.08-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 FL.08-2 FL.08-3 Site Operations: Processed monazite ore in the 1950s. FL.08-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - No AEC involvement at the site FL.08-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Thorium FL.08-1 Radiological Survey(s): No Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to Humphreys Gold Co. FL.08-1 - AEC Memorandum; Edmonds to McCarvill; Subject: Monazite Dredging Operations and Placer Deposits Containing Thorium Minerals; June

402

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Painesville - OH 29  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Painesville - OH 29 Painesville - OH 29 FUSRAP Considered Sites Painesville, OH Alternate Name(s): Clifton Products Company OH.29-1 Location: Painsville , Ohio OH.29-1 Historical Operations: Produced high-purity beryllium and beryllium-copper alloys. OH.29-1 Eligibility Determination: Radiological Survey(s): None Site Status: Cleanup in progress by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. OH.29-1 USACE Website Long-term Care Requirements: To be determined upon site transition. Also see Documents Related to Painesville, OH OH.29-1 - Memorandum/Checklist; S. Jones to the File; Subject: Elimination Recommendation of Clifton Products; April 30, 1987 Historical documents may contain links which are no longer valid or to outside sources. LM can not attest to the accuracy of information provided

403

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn - NY  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn - Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn - NY 0-19 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NY.0-19 (POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF BROOKLYN) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: New York , New York NY.0-19-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-19-1 Site Operations: Research and development involving only small quantities of radiological material in a controlled environment. NY.0-19-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination remote NY.0-19-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Not specified NY.0-19-1 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to NY.0-19 NY.0-19-1 - Aerospace Letter; Young to Wallo; Subject: Elimination

404

Impact of DOE Orders on Waste Management Operation. Volume 1: [Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Department of Energy Orders are the internal documents which govern the management of all Department of Energy facilities and operations. DOE Orders are the vehicles by which Federal and state laws and regulations are applied to Department of Energy activities. A selected set of 22 Department of Energy Orders was reviewed to identify the applicability and impact of each Order on waste management operations at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Of the 22 Orders reviewed, five set forth requirements which have a high degree of impact on waste management activities. Eight Orders have a moderate degree of impact on waste management activities, and the remaining nine Orders have a low degree of impact.

Klein, R.B.; Jennrich, E.A.; Shuman, R.; Sandquist, G.M. [Rogers and Associates Engineering Corp., Salt Lake City, UT (United States); Rutz, A.C.; Littleton, M.W.; McCauce, C.H. [Wastren, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1989-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

DOE-HDBk-1139/1-2000; Chemical Management Volume 1 of 3  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1139/1-2000 November 2000 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 September 2004 DOE HANDBOOK CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT (Volume 1 of 3) U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds DOE-HDBK-1139/1-2000 Change Notice No. 1 iii Page / Section Change p. iv / Table of Contents Added reference to new Appendix D p. 4 / Acronyms and Abbreviations Added new acronyms consistent with new Appendix D p. D-1 / Appendix D New appendix added: Appendix D, Life Cycle Management of Shock Sensitive Chemicals

406

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Edgemont Mill Site - SD 01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Edgemont Mill Site - SD 01 Edgemont Mill Site - SD 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Edgemont Mill Site (SD.01) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site Documents Related to Edgemont Mill Site 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title II Disposal Sites-Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site. LMS/S09415. November 2012 U.S. Department of Energy 2008 UMTRCA Title II Sites Annual Report November 2008 Edgemont, South Dakota FACT SHEET Office of Legacy Management Edgemont, South Dakota, Disposal Site This fact sheet provides information about the Uranium Mill

407

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nevada Test Site - 023  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Nevada Test Site - 023 Nevada Test Site - 023 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Nevada Test Site (023) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: The Nevada Test Site was established by the Atomic Energy Commission in the 1950's to conduct field testing of nuclear explosives in connection with the research and development of nuclear weapons. The environmental management activities for this site are under the purview of the Department of Energy¿s Nevada Operations Office. The National Nuclear Security Administration is the site landlord and will be responsible for Long Term Stewardship. Also see Documents Related to Nevada Test Site

408

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rocky Flats SOG  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SOG SOG Rocky Flats Site, Colorado Rocky Flats, Colorado, Site Operations Guide All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Site Operations Guide Appendixes Appendix A: Annual Site Inspection Checklist Appendix B: Example Contact Record Appendix C: Rocky Flats Site Soil Disturbance Evaluation Procedure Appendix D: Site-Specific Checklist Appendix E: Rocky Flats, Colorado, Site Erosion Control Monitoring and Maintenance Inspection Procedure Appendix F: Erosion Control Plan for Rocky Flats Property Central Operable Unit Appendix G: Wildland Fire Management Plan for the Rocky Flats, Colorado, Site Appendix H: Emergency Response Plan for the Rocky Flats Site Dams Appendix I: Additional Field Implementation Detail for Selected Monitoring Objectives Historic documents may contain links to outside sources. LM cannot attest

409

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rocky Flats Regulatory Documents  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Regulatory Documents Regulatory Documents Rocky Flats Site, Colorado Regulatory Documents All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Notification that GS01 is no longer an RFLMA Point of Compliance (POC) Third Five-Year Review Report for the Rocky Flats Site Rocky Flats Legacy Management Agreement Environmental Covenant, November 14, 2011 Corrective Action Decision/Record of Decision Amendment for Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE) Central Operable Unit Proposed Plan for the Rocky Flats CAD/ROD Amendment (June 2011) Second Five-Year Review Report for the Rocky Flats Site Corrective Action Decision/Record of Decision for Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE) Peripheral Operable Unit and Central Operable Unit Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Proposed Plan Present Landfill Monitoring and Maintenance Plan

410

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Nuclear Metals Inc - MA 09  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Metals Inc - MA 09 Metals Inc - MA 09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NUCLEAR METALS, INC. (MA.09) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Licensed facility - included in NRC action plan (Site Decommissioning Management Plan) in 1990 for cleanup Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 1555 Massachusetts Ave. , Cambridge , Massachusetts MA.09-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 MA.09-1 Site Operations: Produced natural uranium tubes for Savannah River reactor program and fabricated power reactor fuel elements under AEC/NRC license. MA.09-4 MA.09-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority under FUSRAP - AEC licensed operation MA.09-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium, Thorium MA.09-1 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated

411

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties NY -  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties NY - NY 17 FUSRAP Considered Sites Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties, NY Alternate Name(s): Lake Ontario Ordnance Works (LOOW) Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) DOE-Niagara Falls Storage Site NY.17-1 NY.17-3 Location: Lewiston , New York NY.17-5 Historical Operations: Stored, shipped, and buried radioactive equipment and waste for MED and AEC containing uranium, radium, and thorium. Portions of the former site are privately owned, creating a "site" for the vicinity properties. NY.17-1 NY.17-2 NY.17-14 Eligibility Determination: Eligible NY.17-4 Radiological Survey(s): Assessment Surveys, Verification Surveys NY.17-3 NY.17-5 NY.17-6 NY.17-7 NY.17-8 NY.17-9 NY.17-10 NY.17-11 NY.17-12 NY.17-14 Site Status: Certification Basis, including Federal Register Notice for 23 properties. Cleanup in progress for additional 3 VPs. NY.17-13

412

Guidance for Developing and Implementing Institutional Controls for Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance at DOE Legacy Management Sites  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This guidance document is to help U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) personnel understand what is necessary and acceptable for implementing the provisions of DOE...

413

Performance measures for evaluating public participation activities in DOE`s Office of Environmental Management  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Public participation in decision-making in the United States has become a dominant theme throughout the public sector and is increasingly used in the private sector. Recent reports by the National Research Council and the Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, set up jointly by the White House and Congress, conclude that risk decisions must increasingly be structured in such a manner as to involve stakeholders meaningfully in the processes and activities leading to decisions and, perhaps, through decision implementation. Both of these reports indicate that decisions may take longer but be better if officials: (1) bring all interested and affected parties to the table at the beginning of the risk-discussion process; (2) identify relevant concerns, losses, exposures and other information the parties have; (3) address significant concerns through appropriate research; and (4) present findings in an understandable, accessible way. This report is intended to facilitate subsequent evaluations of public participation activities and programs.

Carnes, S.A.; Schweitzer, M.; Peelle, E.B.; Wolfe, A.K.; Munro, J.F.

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

Energy Planning And Management Program, Wapa Programmatic Doe/eis-0182  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1995/01eis0182_ep.html[6/27/2011 10:56:10 AM] 1995/01eis0182_ep.html[6/27/2011 10:56:10 AM] Energy Planning and Management Program Environmental Impact Statement DOE/EIS-0182 Western Area Power Administration Energy Planning and Management Program Environmental Impact Statement Energy Planning And Management Program, Wapa Programmatic Doe/eis-0182 file:///I|/Data%20Migration%20Task/EIS-0182-FEIS-1995/02eis0182_cov.html[6/27/2011 10:56:06 AM] COVER SHEET Title: Energy Planning and Management program Agency: Western Area Power Administration Contact: Mr. Robert Fullerton Western Area Power Administration

415

DOE-HDBK-1101-2004; Process Safety Management for Highly Hazardous Chemicals  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HDBK-1101-2004 HDBK-1101-2004 August 2004 Superseding DOE-HDBK-1101-96 February 1996 DOE HANDBOOK PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT FOR HIGHLY HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-1101-2004 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

416

DOE-STD-1165-2003; Aviation Manager Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-2003 5-2003 September 2003 DOE STANDARD AVIATION MANAGER FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1165-2003 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000.

417

(DOE/EIS-0285-SA-117): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS - (Ross Complex) 1/16/03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

16, 2003 16, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/CSB-2 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-117- (Ross Complex) Paul Martin TFHV/CSB2 Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the non-electric portions of the Bonneville Power Administration's Ross Complex Location: The Ross Complex is located at 5411 NE Highway 99, Vancouver, Clark County, Washington in the BPA Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to manage and maintain grounds and landscaping in the non-electrical portions of the Ross Facility. Vegetation management at the Facility shall include: 1) bare ground management of graveled storage areas, perimeter roads and parking

418

DOE Environmental Management Strategy and Experience for In-Situ Decommissioning  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategy and Experience Strategy and Experience for In Situ Decommissioning Prepared By U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Office of Engineering and Technology, EM-20 September 2009 This page is deliberately blank. DOE EM Strategy and Experience for In Situ Decommissioning i Contents Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................................iv Acronyms...................................................................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................

419

Does the management of regulatory compliance and occupational risk have an impact on safety culture?  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Does the management of regulatory compliance and occupational risk have an impact on safety culture of safety culture has progressively taken hold in organizations. The idea has numerous benefits and can the nature and strength of relationships between safety culture and two explanatory variables; namely

Boyer, Edmond

420

Earned Value Management System (EVMS) for use with DOE O 413.3B  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, (the Order) was revised November 29, 2010. As a result, the companion 413.3 Series Guides must be revised to align with the requirements delineated in the Order.

2010-11-29T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Managing Design and Construction Using Systems Engineering for Use with DOE O 413.3A  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides the Department of Energy's federal project directors with the methodologies and tools needed to plan, implement and complete assigned projects using a Systems Engineering approach in accordance with the requirements of DOE O 413.3A, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, dated 7-28-06. No cancellations.

2008-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

422

How does Property Management effect Colorado State University is accountable to  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. 1821 Equipment titled to CSU costing $5 000 or more purchased in a 21-fund general ledger account purchased on a 21-fund general ledger account. (Must have EAR proper approval from 21-fund Accountants) MayHow does Property Management effect my job? Colorado State University is accountable to taxpayers

423

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-99): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS -Olympia-Grand Coulee No.1 8/29/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 9, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-99-Olympia-Grand Coulee No. 1 Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Olympia-Grand Coulee No. 1, 287 kV transmission line from structure 53/4 through structure 64/1. Corridor width is 125 feet. Location: The project area is located within King County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of-way, access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridor. Approximately 163 acres will be treated using selective and non-selective methods that include hand cutting, mowing and herbicide treatments. Vegetation management is required for unimpeded

424

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA 84): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS Monroe-Custer No.1 7/1/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July July 1, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA 84 Monroe-Custer No.l Don Atkinson -- - TFN/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Monroe-Custer No. 1500kV transmission line from structure 61/1 through structure 88/4. This project includes contemporaneous vegetation management along the Monroe-Custer No. 2 500kV and the Arlington-Bellingham 230kV transmission line corridors which run parallel to the subject transmission line. Corridor width varies from 140 to 825 feet. (All structure locations referenced in this SA refer to the Monroe-Custer No. 1.) The project area is located within Whatcom County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the

425

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

its Ames Laboratory its Ames Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate its Ames Laboratory June 29, 2006 - 2:48pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued its Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of a management and operating (M&O) contractor to operate Ames Laboratory, a DOE Office of Science (SC) research facility in Ames, Iowa. This competition for a contractor is the first in the history of the laboratory. Ames is a laboratory that has been funded at approximately $30 million annually by the Office of Science, other government agencies, and private industry. "Ames Laboratory provides leadership in basic research across a broad spectrum of science, with great expertise in biology, chemistry, physics

426

DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DOE Issues Request for Proposals Seeking a Contractor to Manage and Operate Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory July 10, 2006 - 2:57pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced the issuance of a final Request for Proposals (RFP) for the competitive selection of an approximately $1.58 billion, five-year management and operating contract for Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). Fermilab is a major DOE Office of Science single program research facility located on 6,800 acres approximately 45 miles west of Chicago, Illinois. "Fermilab is a world leader in high energy physics, which helps the U.S. maintain global competitiveness," said Under Secretary for Science, Dr.

427

Assessment of Disposal Options for DOE-Managed High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Assessment of Disposal Options for DOE-Managed High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel report assesses the technical options for the safe and permanent disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF) managed by the Department of Energy. Specifically, it considers whether DOE-managed HLW and SNF should be disposed of with commercial SNF and HLW in one geologic repository or whether there are advantages to developing separate geologic disposal pathways for some DOE-managed HLW and SNF. The report recommends that the Department begin implementation of a phased, adaptive, and consent-based strategy with development of a separate mined repository for some DOE-managed HLW and cooler DOE-managed SNF.

428

2008 Project Management Awards | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Awards » 2008 Project Management Awards Project Assessment (OPA) OPA Home About Project Management Processes and Procedures Cost & Contingency EDIA Escalation Rates Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Certifications Awards Lessons Learned Tools & Resources SC Projects Other Links SC Federal Project Directors (FPD) and FPD Resources Contact Information Project Assessment U.S. Department of Energy SC-28/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-4840 F: (301) 903-8520 E: sc.opa@science.doe.gov Awards 2008 Project Management Awards Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Presented at the 2009 Department of Energy Project Management Workshop SECRETARY'S AWARD of ACHIEVEMENT: Office of Science, Large Hadron Collider (LHC) ATLAS and CMS Detector

429

February 9, 2004, Board Public Meeting Presentations … DOE Management Challenges for 2004  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

The Deputy Secretary of Energy The Deputy Secretary of Energy Washington, DC 20585 January 22,2004 MEMORANDUM FOR ALL DEPARTMENTAL ELEMENTS FROM: KYLE E. McSLARROW /SUBJECT: CY 2004 Management Challenges Considerable progress has been made in the past year to aggressively confront and address broad management challenges facing the Department. The Inspector General's (IG) November 2003 report, Special Report on Management Challenges at the Department of Energy, acknowledged our progress by removing two of the management challenges - performance management and worker and community safety - and placing them on the IG's watch list. Despite the progress to date, significant work remains to address fundamental challenges that affect the Department's ability to fulfill its critical missions. At

430

Supplemental Requirements for the Use of Management and Operating or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Notice supplements review and approval requirements of DOE O 350.2A, Use of Management and Operating (M&O) or Other Facility Management Contractor Employees for Services to DOE in the Washington, D.C., Area, dated 10-29-03.

2005-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

431

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA=32): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (11/15/01)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 15, 2001 November 15, 2001 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285-SA-32) Bill Erickson - TPF/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Re-vegetation Plot Study along the Lower Monumental-McNary Transmission Line ROW. The study area sections are located near structures 38/4 and 39/3. The line is a 500kV Single Circuit Transmission Line having an easement width of 165 feet. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor as indicated on the attached checklist. Location: The ROW is located in Walla Walla County, WA being in the Walla Walla Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA).

432

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-02): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 3/9/01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3/09/01 3/09/01 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-02) Bill Erickson - TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Danger tree clearing on nine ROWs. Locations are: the Franklin-Badger Canyon #2; Hedges Tap; White Bluffs-Richland; Grandview-Richland; Badger Canyon-Richland; Franklin- Riverview; Taylor Flats Tap; Walla Walla-Pendleton; and McNary-Slatt Transmission lines. Location: All ROWs are located in the Walla Walla Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear danger trees from varying widths of the indicated transmission line rights-of way that are approaching electrical clearance zones in

433

DOE/EIS-0251; Supplemental Analysis For a Container System for the Management of DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Located at the INEEL  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ID-10636 ID-10636 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS FOR A CONTAINER SYSTEM FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DOE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL LOCATED AT THE INEEL March 1999 U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office Idaho Falls, Idaho DOE/ID-10636 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS FOR A CONTAINER SYSTEM FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DOE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL LOCATED AT THE INEEL March 1999 Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office Idaho Falls, Idaho SNF Supplement Analysis ii March 1999 CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................. v Summary ..........................................................................................................................S-1 1.0 Purpose and Proposed Action ......................................................................................

434

Does  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Does Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Yu-San Liu Æ Yining Zeng Æ Yonghua Luo Æ Qi Xu Æ Michael E. Himmel Æ Steve J. Smith Æ Shi-You Ding Received: 26 November 2008 / Accepted: 11 May 2009 / Published online: 19 June 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Exoglucanases are key enzymes required for the efficient hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. It has been proposed that exoglucanases hydrolyze cellulose chains in a processive manner to produce primarily cellobiose. Usually, two functional modules are involved in the processive mechanism: a catalytic module and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). In this report, single molecule tracking techniques were used to analyze the molecular motion of CBMs labeled with quantum dots (QDs) and bound to cellulose crystals. By tracking the single QD, we observed that the family 2 CBM from

435

Current Progress and Future Plans for the DOE Office of Environmental Management International Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has collaborated with various international institutes for many years on radioactive waste management challenges of mutual concern. Currently, DOE-EM is performing collaborative work with researchers at the Khlopin Radium Institute and the SIA Radon Institute in Russia and the Ukraine's International Radioecology Laboratory to explore issues related to high-level waste and to investigate experience and technologies that could support DOE-EM site cleanup needs. Specific initiatives include: - Application of the Cold Crucible Induction Heated Melter to DOE Wastes - SIA Radon and Savannah River National Laboratory; - Improved Solubility and Retention of Troublesome Components in SRS and Hanford Waste Glasses - Khlopin Radium Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Savannah River National Laboratory; - Long-term Impacts from Radiation/Contamination within the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, International Radioecology Laboratory and Savannah River National Laboratory. This paper provides an overview of the status of the current International Program task activities. The paper will also provide insight into the future direction for the program. Specific ties to the current DOE-EM technology development multi-year planning effort will be highlighted as well as opportunities for future international collaborations. (authors)

Gerdes, K.D. [Office of Engineering and Technology, Office of Environmental Management, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC (United States); Marra, J. C.; Peeler, D.K.; Harbour, M.J.J.R.; Fox, K.M. [Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC (United States); Vienna, J.D. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA (United States); Aloy, A.S. [Khlopin Radium Institute, St. Petersburg (Russian Federation); Stefanovsky, S.V. [SIA Radon, Moscow (Russian Federation); Bondarkov, M.D. [International Radioecology Laboratory, Slavutych (Ukraine)

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

436

CURRENT PROGRESS AND FUTURE PLANS FOR THE DOE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has collaborated with various international institutes for many years on radioactive waste management challenges of mutual concern. Currently, DOE-EM is performing collaborative work with researchers at the Khlopin Radium Institute and the SIA Radon Institute in Russia and the Ukraine's International Radioecology Laboratory to explore issues related to high-level waste and to investigate experience and technologies that could support DOE-EM site cleanup needs. Specific initiatives include: (1) Application of the Cold Crucible Induction Heated Melter to DOE Wastes--SIA Radon and Savannah River National Laboratory; (2) Improved Solubility and Retention of Troublesome Components in SRS and Hanford Waste Glasses--Khlopin Radium Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Savannah River National Laboratory; and (3) Long-term Impacts from Radiation/Contamination within the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone--International Radioecology Laboratory and Savannah River National Laboratory. This paper provides an overview of the status of the current International Program task activities. The paper will also provide insight into the future direction for the program. Specific ties to the current DOE-EM technology development multi-year planning effort will be highlighted as well as opportunities for future international collaborations.

Marra, J; Kurt D Gerdes, K; David Peeler, D; John Harbour, J; Kevin Fox, K

2007-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

437

Information management and collection for US DOE's packaging and transportation needs in the 90's  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Transportation Assessment and Integration (TRAIN) Project (US DOE, 1992) was established to provide a systematic approach to identify the problems and needs that will affect the capability of the United States Department of Energy (US DOE) to provide itself with cost-effective, efficient, and coordinated transportation services during the 1990s. Eight issue areas were identified to be included in the TRAIN Project, with one principal investigator assigned to each. The eight areas are as follows: (1) Packaging and Transportation Needs (PATN) in the 1990s; (2) Institutional and Outreach Programs; (3) Regulatory Impacts on Transportation Management; (4) Traffic and Packaging Operations; (5) Research and Development Requirements; (6) Training Support; (7) Emergency Preparedness Requirements; and (8) US DOE-EM 561 Roles and Responsibilities. This paper focuses on the results of the PATN activity of TRAIN. The objective of PATN is to prepare the US DOE, in general, and US DOE-EM 561 (Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM), Office of Technology Development, Transportation) in particular, respond to the transportation needs of program elements in the Department. One of the first tasks in evaluating these needs was to formulate the potential for transportation of radioactive materials in the next decade.

Wheeler, T. A.; Luna, Robert E.; McClure, J. D. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Quinn, Geoffrey [Wastren, Inc., Germantown, MD (United States)

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

DOE/EIS-0265-SA-162: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS -Libby Creek Lower Cleveland Stabilization Project (07/29/04)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

29, 2004 29, 2004 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-162) Ron Morinaka (KEWU - 4) Fish and Wildlife Project Manager - COTR Proposed Action: Libby Creek (Lower Cleveland) Stabilization Project Project No: 199500400 Watershed Management Program (See App. A : Available Management Techniques): 1.6 Install Large Woody Debris Structures; 1.7 Install Other Habitat Complexity Structures; 1.9 Structural Bank Protection using Bioengineering Methods; 1.16 Spawning Habitat Enhancements; 1.17 Rearing Habitat Enhancements; 2.1 Maintain Healthy Riparian Plant Communities. Location: On Libby Creek, located about 18 miles southwest of the town of Libby, Montana

439

DOE/EIS-0265-SA-170: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS--Tapteal Bend Riparian Corridor Restoration Project (8/11/04)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1, 2004 1, 2004 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-170) Jonathan McCloud Fish and Wildlife Project Manager - KEWL-4 Proposed Action: Tapteal Bend Riparian Corridor Restoration Project Project No: 2002-018-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 1.9 Structural Bank Protection Using Bioengineering Methods, 2.1 Maintain Healthy Riparian Plant Communities Location: Benton County, Washington Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Tapteal Bend Greenway Association Description of the Proposed Action: The Bonneville Power Administration is proposing to fund the

440

(DOE/EIS-0285-SA-87): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS Cowlitz Tap-Olympia White River 7/23/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2002 0, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-87) Mark Shaw TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager - KEWU-4 Proposed Action: Protect and Restore the Asotin Creek Watershed - Upper Charley Subwatershed Ecosystems Restoration Projects (road obliteration) Project No: 2002-054-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 7.18 Road Closure Location: Charley Creek Subwatershed, Umatilla National Forest, Idaho Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Nez Perce Tribal Fisheries/Watershed Program Description of the Proposed Action: BPA is proposing to fund a project that will address

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees Guide for use with DOE O 440.1  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This implementation guide provides general information and methodologies that DOE finds acceptable in meeting the Department's requirements defined in DOE O 440.1.

1997-07-10T23:59:59.000Z

442

Protection of Human Subjects  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Policy is to establish DOE-specific principles for the protection of human subjects involved in DOE research. Cancels DOE P 443.1. Canceled by DOE O 443.1B

2007-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

443

Upgraded IMG Data Management System Released by DOE JGI to Eager User  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4, 2007 4, 2007 Upgraded Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) Data Management System Released by DOE JGI to Eager User Community WALNUT CREEK, CA--A powerful set of computational tools established to ease the visualization and exploration of genomes flooding the public domain is now available in IMG Version 2.3--the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) data management system hosted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI). The content of IMG 2.3, upgraded with new microbial genomes from the Version 23 release of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Reference Sequence (RefSeq) collection, now includes fungi, protists (eukaryotic unicellular organisms), and plant genomes to enhance the breadth of comparative analysis. A new addition of particular interest to

444

DOE-STD-1187-2005; Beryllium-Associated Worker Registry Data Collection and Management Guidance  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 May 2005 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Beryllium-Associated Worker Registry Data Collection and Management Guidance U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1187-2005 ii FOREWORD 1. Use of this standard is not mandatory. Users should review the document and determine if it meets their purpose. 2. Comments (recommendations, additions, and deletions) that may be of use in improving this document should be addressed to: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Health, c/o Paul Wambach, EH-53/270 Corporate Square Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585-0270. 3. This standard was developed through a consensus process by staff operating the DOE

445

December 16, 2005, Board letter regarding the new DOE Manual on Integrated Safety Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6,2005 6,2005 The Honorable Samuel W. Bodman Secretary of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S W Washington, DC 20585- 1000 Dear Secretary Bodman: The Department of Energy (DOE) submitted its implementation plan for Recommendation 2004- 1 , Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations, to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) on June 10,2005. Commitment 22 under that implementation plan deals with issuing and implementing expectations for DOE organizations regarding the implementation of Integrated Safety Management (ISM). In particular, Deliverable B is a new DOE Manual on ISM. The due date associated with the manual is December 2005. It is important to note that ISM has been one of the primary success stories of the defense nuclear complex. Your staff has been working with the Board's staff to achieve a satisfactory

446

DOE  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

DOE DOE /E/A- 0202( 83//Q J Sh or t-T er m En er gy O ut lo ok a to m Quar terly Proje ction s Febru ary 1983 Ene rgy Info rma tion Adm inist ratio n Was hing ton, D.C. t rt jrt .or t lor t lor t .lor t- ior t- ior t <.o rt ort . m .er m -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -Te rm -T erm -T erm -T erm Nrm ue rgy En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y En erg y ^n erg y Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Ou tlo ok Sh ort -T erm 1 Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm Sh ort -T erm

447

(DOE/EIS-0285-SA-115): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS, Shelton-Fairmount # 1-4 12/20/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 0, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA 115, Shelton- Fairmount # 1-4. James A. Jellison - TFO/Olympia Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Shelton Fairmount # 1-4 230kV & 115kV transmission lines corridor from structure 34/3 through structure 60/2 (reference line ADNO 8354). Right of way width averages 258 feet. Location: The project area is located in Jefferson County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of- way, access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridors. Approximately 26 miles of right-of-way will be treated using selective and non-selective methods that include hand cutting, mowing and

448

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-110): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS-Covington-Columbia No. 3) 10/2/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS DOE/EIS-0285/SA-110-Covington-Columbia No. 3 Don Atkinson - TFN/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Covington-Columbia No. 3, 230kV transmission lines from structure 1/1 through structure 12/1. Corridor width varies from 150 feet to 537.5 feet. The project area is located within King County, Washington. Location: The project area is located within King County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of-way, access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridor. Approximately 568.4 acres of the right-of-way will be treated using selective and non-selective methods that include

449

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-114): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program EIS (Chehalis-Raymond #1, ADNO 8114) 12/5/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

December December 5, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-114) (Chehalis-Raymond #1, ADNO 8114) Jim Jellison - TFO/Olympia Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for portion of the Chehalis-Raymond #1 115 kV transmission line Location: Project location is within Lewis and Pacific counties, Washington and is within the Olympia Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to clear targeted vegetation within the Right-of- Ways along access roads and around towers that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission lines. See Section 1.4 of the attached checklists for a complete description of the proposed action. Analysis: Please see the attached checklist for the resources

450

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-132 (Big Eddy-Ostrander #1)(3/19/03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9, 2003 9, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-132 (Big Eddy-Ostrander #1) Libby Johnson Natural Resource Specialist - TFR/THE DALLES Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for portion of the Big Eddy - Ostrander #1 500 kV transmission line located from tower structure 31/2 to 39/3. Location: Project location is in BPA Redmond Region in Hood River County, Oregon. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to clear targeted vegetation within the Right-of- Ways along access roads and around towers that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission lines. See Section 1.4 of the attached checklists for a complete

451

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-149-Captain Jack-Malin #1)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8, 2003 8, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-149-Captain Jack-Malin #1) Elizabeth Johnson Natural Resource Specialist - TFR/The Dalles Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Captain Jack-Malin #1 500 kV transmission line from structure 2/4 to Malin Substation (reference line). Right of way width averages 150 feet. Location: The project location is within Klamath County, Oregon near the city of Malin, and is within the Redmond Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of- way, access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridors.

452

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA 118): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program EIS, Holcomb-Naselle 115kV)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2003 7, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-SA 118, Holcomb - Naselle 115 kV. James A. Jellison - TFO/Olympia Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Holcomb Naselle 115kV transmission line corridor from structure 1/1 through structure 21/10. Right of way width averages 100 feet. Location: The project area is located in Pacific County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of- way, access roads and around tower structures along the subject transmission line corridor. Approximately 21 miles of right-of-way will be treated using selective and non-selective

453

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-146-Custer-Ingledow No.1&2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-146-Custer-Ingledow No.1&2 Don Atkinson Natural Resource Specialist - TFN/Snohomish Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for portion of the Custer-Ingledow No.1&2 500 kV transmission line located from tower structure 1/4 to 9/6. Location: Project location is in BPA Snohomish Region in Whatcom County, Washington. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to clear targeted vegetation within the Right-of- Ways along access roads and around towers that may impede the operation and maintenance of the subject transmission lines. See Section 1.4 of the attached checklists for a complete

454

Small Business Program Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Small Business Program Management Small Business Program Management Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Categorical Exclusion Determinations Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Larry Kelly U.S. Department of Energy 200 Administration Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830 P: (865) 576-0885 Services Small Business Program Management Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Related Links Federal Acquisition Regulations External link DOE Small Business Program U.S. Small Business Administration External link Small Businesses are vital to our country's continued growth and it is important to the ISC that small business is provided the maximum practical

455

Resource Management Organization | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Organization Organization Deputy Director for Resource Management Deputy Director Home Mission & Functions Deputy Director Biography Organization Organization Chart .pdf file (77KB) Budget Business Policy and Operations Communications and Public Affairs Grants & Contracts Support Human Resources and Administration Program Direction and Analysis Scientific & Technical Information (OSTI) Contact Information Deputy Director for Resource Management U.S. Department of Energy SC-4/Forrestal Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (202) 586-9776 F: (202) 586-4120 E: sc.science@science.doe.gov Resource Management Organization Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page The following offices support the science programs and field operations offices in achieving their missions:

456

DOE CORPORATE REPORTING  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7/23/2010 7/23/2010 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) CORPORATE REPORTING To ensure projects are effectively managed and delivering on the goals of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act), DOE will collect data on project management and execution, risk management, job creation, and key project milestones, in addition to what is required by Section 1512 of the Recovery Act. In most cases, monthly data will be used internally for managerial purposes only, but where DOE does intend to publicize monthly data, it will clearly indicate it to be "preliminary/informal and subject to change." Recipients are required to provide DOE information on, but not limited to, the following issues:

457

ORISE: Protecting Human Subjects  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

or performed by DOE employees, addresses the protection of human subjects. The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) supports DOE in its efforts to protect...

458

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-113-1): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program Updates 9/27/02 SA-113 12/2/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

12/02/02 12/02/02 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-113-1) Updates 9/27/02 SA-113 Bill Erickson, TFP/Walla Walla Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: To perform remedial vegetation management for keeping vegetation a safe distance away from electric power facilities and controlling noxious weeds within a section of BPA's Big Eddy-Ostrander Transmission Corridor. During a site review conducted in late fall of 2001, the inspector observed various species of hardwood trees resprouted from stumps. The new vegetative growth encroached on the required "Minimum Safe Distance" between the top of vegetation and the conductor cables. The management action is necessary to reduce the current and potential future hazards that tall- growing vegetation poses to transmission

459

DOE-HDBK-1203-97; Guide to Good Practices for Training of Technical Staff and Managers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1203-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1008-92 July 1992 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING OF TECHNICAL STAFF AND MANAGERS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE97000785 DOE-HDBK-1203-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE

460

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Slick Rock Mill Site - CO 08  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Slick Rock Mill Site - CO 08 Slick Rock Mill Site - CO 08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Slick Rock Mill Site (CO.08) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Slick Rock, Colorado, Processing Site Documents Related to Slick Rock Mill Site 2012 Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites-Slick Rock, Colorado, Disposal Site. LMS/S09461. February 2013 Verification Monitoring Report for the Slick Rock, Colorado, Processing Sites, 2007 Update June 2008 Office of Legacy Management DOE M/1577 2008 - -L Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. for the U.S.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-09)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation from the rights of way and access roads for BPA's McNary-Santiam No. 1 Transmission Line, beginning in the summer of 2000 and ending in July, 2001. This Supplemental Analysis finds that: (1) the proposed actions are substantially consistent with the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285) and ROD; and (2) there are no new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed actions or their impacts. Therefore, no further NEPA documentation is required.

N /A

2001-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

17.6 - Origin, Characteristics, and Significance of the DOE's Management and Operating  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chapter 17.6 (October 2007) Chapter 17.6 (October 2007) 1 DISCUSSION OF THE ORIGIN, CHARACTERISTICS, AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY's MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING (M&O) FORM OF CONTRACT INTRODUCTION. "Management and operating" (M&O) contract is a term used to describe the contracts that are central to the Department of Energy's (DOE's) business model. The term was adopted formally in a memorandum from the Secretary of Energy, dated October 5, 1983. 1 However, these contracts predate the inception of the term by more than thirty-five years, dating to contracts awarded by the Corps of Engineers during World War II, and other contracts awarded by the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) from its creation in the Atomic Energy Act of 1946.

463

DOE handbook: Integrated safety management systems (ISMS) verification team leader`s handbook  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary purpose of this handbook is to provide guidance to the ISMS verification Team Leader and the verification team in conducting ISMS verifications. The handbook describes methods and approaches for the review of the ISMS documentation (Phase I) and ISMS implementation (Phase II) and provides information useful to the Team Leader in preparing the review plan, selecting and training the team, coordinating the conduct of the verification, and documenting the results. The process and techniques described are based on the results of several pilot ISMS verifications that have been conducted across the DOE complex. A secondary purpose of this handbook is to provide information useful in developing DOE personnel to conduct these reviews. Specifically, this handbook describes methods and approaches to: (1) Develop the scope of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 review processes to be consistent with the history, hazards, and complexity of the site, facility, or activity; (2) Develop procedures for the conduct of the Phase 1 review, validating that the ISMS documentation satisfies the DEAR clause as amplified in DOE Policies 450.4, 450.5, 450.6 and associated guidance and that DOE can effectively execute responsibilities as described in the Functions, Responsibilities, and Authorities Manual (FRAM); (3) Develop procedures for the conduct of the Phase 2 review, validating that the description approved by the Approval Authority, following or concurrent with the Phase 1 review, has been implemented; and (4) Describe a methodology by which the DOE ISMS verification teams will be advised, trained, and/or mentored to conduct subsequent ISMS verifications. The handbook provides proven methods and approaches for verifying that commitments related to the DEAR, the FRAM, and associated amplifying guidance are in place and implemented in nuclear and high risk facilities. This handbook also contains useful guidance to line managers when preparing for a review of ISMS for radiological facilities, non-nuclear, or non-Defense Programs facilities. DOE line managers are encouraged to tailor the procedures described in this handbook for ISMS verifications for low risk facilities.

NONE

1999-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Closure of hazardous and mixed radioactive waste management units at DOE facilities. [Contains glossary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is document addresses the Federal regulations governing the closure of hazardous and mixed waste units subject to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements. It provides a brief overview of the RCRA permitting program and the extensive RCRA facility design and operating standards. It provides detailed guidance on the procedural requirements for closure and post-closure care of hazardous and mixed waste management units, including guidance on the preparation of closure and post-closure plans that must be submitted with facility permit applications. This document also provides guidance on technical activities that must be conducted both during and after closure of each of the following hazardous waste management units regulated under RCRA.

Not Available

1990-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Record of Decision for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program (DOE/EIS-0285) (07/00)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SYSTEM VEGETATION SYSTEM VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Record of Decision DOE/EIS-0285 Cooperating Agencies J U L Y 2 0 0 0 Bonneville Power Administration Transmission System Vegetation Management Program Record of Decision Table of Contents Summary of Decision .................................................................................................................................... 1 For Further Information .............................................................................................................................. 2 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Decisions ........................................................................................................................................................

466

Proceedings of the tenth annual DOE low-level waste management conference: Session 4: Waste treatment minimization  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains eleven papers on various aspects of low-level radioactive waste management. Topics in this volume include: volume reduction plans; incentitives; and cost proposals; acid detoxification and reclamation; decontamination of lead; leach tests; West Valley demonstration project status report; and DOE's regional management strategies. Individual papers were processed separately for the data base. (TEM)

Not Available

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

Protection of Human Subjects  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The purpose of this Policy is to establish DOE-specific policy for the protection of human subjects involved in DOE research. Canceled by DOE P 443.1A.

2000-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

468

EIS-0203F; DOE Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and INEL Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final Environmental Impact Statement  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Summary-1995.html[6/27/2011 12:08:32 PM] Summary-1995.html[6/27/2011 12:08:32 PM] SUMMARY DOE/EIS-0203-F Department of Energy Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final Environmental Impact Statement Summary April 1995 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Idaho Operations Office Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 1995 Dear Citizen: This is a summary of the Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final Environmental Impact Statement. The Department of Energy and

469

Protection of Human Subjects  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The order establishes Department of Energy (DOE) procedures and responsibilities for implementing the policy and requirements set forth in 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 745, Protection of Human Subjects; and in DOE P 443.1A, Protection of Human Subjects, dated 12-20-07. Cancels DOE O 443.1. Canceled by DOE O 443.1B.

2007-12-20T23:59:59.000Z

470

Protection of Human Subjects  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To establish DOE procedures and responsibilities for implementing the policy and requirements set forth in 10 CFR Part 745, Protection of Human Subjects, ad in DOE P 443.1, Policy on the Protection of Human Subjects. Cancels DOE O 1300.3. Canceled by DOE O 443.1A.

2000-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

471

EIS(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-61) Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS 4/15/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

April 15, 2002 April 15, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-61 Tom Murphy - TFS/Bell-1 - Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management along the Bell-Boundary No.3, 84/4 to 96/1 Transmission Line ROW. The line is a 230kV Double Circuit Transmission Line having an easement width of 100 feet. The proposed work will be accomplished in the indicated sections of the transmission line corridor. Location: The ROW is located in both Stevens and Pend Oreille County, WA, being in the Spokane Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to clear unwanted vegetation in the rights-of-

472

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA- 129) Ashe-Marion #2 [Mile 150-157]  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2003 7, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA- 129 Ashe-Marion #2 [Mile 150-157] Elizabeth Johnson Natural Resource Specialist- TFR/The Dalles Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Ashe-Marion #2 500 kV transmission line from structure 150/2 through structure 157/7 (reference line). The Buckley-Marion #1 transmission line is also present within the proposed corridor. Right of way width averages 135 feet. Location: The project location is within Wasco County, Oregon near the city of Pine Grove, and is within the Redmond Region. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of-

473

DOE/EIS-0285/SA-134: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (Bandon-Rogue-GoldBeach)(3/24/03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4, 2003 4, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-134-Bandon-Rogue-GoldBeach) Ben Tilley Natural Resource Specialist - TFE/Alvey Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Bandon-Rogue-Gold Beach transmission line corridor. This corridor includes the Bandon-Rogue #1 115 kV transmission line from Bandon Substation to Rogue Substation and the Rogue-Gold Beach #1 and #2 115kV transmission lines, starting at Rogue Substation and ending at Gold Beach Substation. In addition the project includes adjacent portions of the Fairview-Rogue #1 230 kV Transmission Line. Location: The project is located in the BPA Eugene Region, Coos and Curry Counties, Oregon.

474

(DOE/EIS-0285/SA-63): Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS, North Bonneville-Midway and Hanford-Ostrander 4/22/02  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2, 2002 2, 2002 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS, North Bonneville-Midway and Hanvor-Ostrander (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-63) Elizabeth Johnson - TFR/The Dalles Natural Resource Specialist Proposed Action: Vegetation Management on the North Bonneville-Midway and Hanford- Ostrander transmission line right-of-way (approx. 702 acres). The project area begins at the North Bonneville Substation and terminates at structure 25/3+500. For most of the length of the right-of-way, the width is 300 feet wide on the North Bonneville-Midway Line and 150 feet wide for the Hanford- Ostrander Line. Location: The ROW is located in North Bonneville, Skamania County, OR, being in the

475

Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-130- Keeler-Tillamook)(3/10/03)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0, 2003 0, 2003 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEP/4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for the Transmission System Vegetation Management Program FEIS (DOE/EIS-0285/SA-130- Keeler-Tillamook) Mark Newbill Natural Resource Specialist- TFE/Chemawa Proposed Action: Vegetation Management for the Keeler Tillamook 115 kV transmission line from structure 1/7 through structure 58/2, and along adjacent portions of the Keeler-Forest Grove #2 115KV transmission line. In addition the project includes 11miles of the 115KV Timber Tap. Location: The project is located in the BPA Eugene Region, Tillamook and Washington Counties, Oregon. Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposal: BPA proposes to remove unwanted vegetation along the right-of-

476

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Naval Ordnance Plant - MI 0-03  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Plant - MI 0-03 Plant - MI 0-03 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: NAVAL ORDNANCE PLANT (MI.0-03) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DoD for action Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Centerline , Michigan MI.0-03-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 MI.0-03-1 Site Operations: Assembled bomb components. MI.0-03-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No Authority - Referred to DoD MI.0-03-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DoD for action MI.0-03-1 Also see Documents Related to NAVAL ORDNANCE PLANT MI.0-03-1 - DOE Letter; J.Fiore to C.Shafer; Subject: Information on

477

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Metals Selling Corp - CT 0-01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Selling Corp - CT 0-01 Selling Corp - CT 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: METALS SELLING CORP. (CT.0-01 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Putnam , Connecticut CT.0-01-1 Evaluation Year: 1986 CT.0-01-1 Site Operations: Performed grinding of (non-radioactive) magnesium circa 1950 -1952 as a sub-contractor to Mallinckrodt Corp. CT.0-01-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No indication that radioactive materials were handled at this location CT.0-01-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: No Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Radiological Survey(s): No Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to METALS SELLING CORP. CT.0-01-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist D. Levine to File; Subject -

478

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Wyckoff Drawn Steel Co - IL 0-09  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Drawn Steel Co - IL 0-09 Drawn Steel Co - IL 0-09 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Wyckoff Drawn Steel Co (IL 0-09) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Chicago , Illinois IL.0-09-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 IL.0-09-3 Site Operations: Experimentation on centerless grinding of uranium rods in 1943. IL.0-09-2 IL.0-09-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Potential for contamination considered remote based on the limited scope of activities at the site IL.0-09-1 IL.0-09-3 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium IL.0-09-2 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to Wyckoff Drawn Steel Co IL.0-09-1 - DOE Letter; Wagoner to Daley; Subject: Wycoff Steel Co.

479

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Dow-Detroit Edison Project - MI 0-02  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Dow-Detroit Edison Project - MI Dow-Detroit Edison Project - MI 0-02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Dow-Detroit Edison Project (MI.0-02 ) Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Detroit , Michigan MI.0-02-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 MI.0-02-1 Site Operations: Performed reference design work for a special fast breeder type reactor. MI.0-02-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - No radioactive material handled at the site MI.0-02-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: No Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None MI.0-02-1 Radiological Survey(s): no Site Status: Eliminated from further consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to Dow-Detroit Edison Project MI.0-02-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist; S.Jones to the File; Subject:

480

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rohm and Hass Co - PA 02  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Rohm and Hass Co - PA 02 Rohm and Hass Co - PA 02 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: ROHM & HASS CO. (PA.02 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: 5000 Richmond Street , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania PA.02-1 Evaluation Year: 1985 PA.02-2 Site Operations: Research and development on uranium recovery from carbonate leach liquors in the mid-1950s. PA.02-3 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria PA.02-4 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium PA.02-3 Radiological Survey(s): Yes PA.02-4 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP PA.02-5 Also see Documents Related to ROHM & HASS CO. PA.02-1 - DOE Letter; Thornton to Bjuvik; Subject: Radiological

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "management subject doe" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mare Island Navy Yard - CA 0-01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Mare Island Navy Yard - CA 0-01 Mare Island Navy Yard - CA 0-01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: MARE ISLAND NAVY YARD (CA.0-01 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DoD Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Mare Island , California CA.0-01-2 Evaluation Year: 1989 CA.0-01-1 Site Operations: Naval yard and shipping station. CA.0-01-2 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Referred to DOD CA.0-01-1 CA.0-01-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None CA.0-01-2 Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP - Referred to DoD CA.0-01-2 Also see Documents Related to MARE ISLAND NAVY YARD CA.0-01-1 - DOE Memorandum; Wallo to Carwell; Subject: List of

482

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- U S Bureau of Mines - UT 01  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

UT 01 UT 01 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: U. S. BUREAU OF MINES (UT.01) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Salt Lake City , Utah UT.01-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 UT.01-1 Site Operations: Research and development on uranium recovery from ore in the late 1940s. UT.01-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated - Radiation levels below criteria UT.01-1 UT.01-2 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium UT.01-2 Radiological Survey(s): Yes UT.01-2 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to U. S. BUREAU OF MINES UT.01-1 - DOE Letter; Fiore to Schiager; Subject: Elimination of Bureau of Mines and University of Utah Sites from FUSRAP Consideration;

483

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Colorado Fuel and Iron - NY 0-08  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Fuel and Iron - NY 0-08 Fuel and Iron - NY 0-08 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Colorado Fuel and Iron (NY.0-08 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: None Location: Watervliet , New York NY.0-08-1 Evaluation Year: 1987 NY.0-08-1 Site Operations: Site was a contractor to DuPont. Exact nature of operations is not clear. No records to indicate that radioactive materials were handled at the site. NY.0-08-1 Site Disposition: Eliminated NY.0-08-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: None Indicated Radiological Survey(s): None Indicated Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Also see Documents Related to Colorado Fuel and Iron NY.0-08-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist; S.Jones to the File; Subject:

484

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory - NM 11  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory - NM 11 TA-1 Manhattan Laboratory - NM 11 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: TA-1 MANHATTAN LABORATORY (NM.11 ) Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP Designated Name: Not Designated Alternate Name: Main Technical Area LASL LANL NM.11-1 NM.11-2 NM.11-3 Location: Los Alamos , New Mexico NM.11-3 Evaluation Year: 1985 NM.11-1 Site Operations: Nuclear weapons research and development. NM.11-1 NM.11-3 Site Disposition: Site Disposition NM.11-1 Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Uranium , Plutonium, Fission Products NM.11-1 NM.11-3 Radiological Survey(s): Yes NM.11-2 NM.11-3 Site Status: Eliminated from consideration under FUSRAP NM.11-1 Also see Documents Related to TA-1 MANHATTAN LABORATORY NM.11-1 - DOE Memorandum/Checklist; Jones to File; Subject:

485

DOE/EIS-0265-SA-165: Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (8/4/04)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-165) Supplement Analysis for the Watershed Management Program EIS (DOE/EIS-0265/SA-165) Mickey Carter TO: Fish and Wildlife Project Manager - KEWU-4 Proposed Action: Idaho Model Watershed Habitat Projects - Welp Riparian Enhancement Fence Project No: 1994-017-00 Watershed Management Techniques or Actions Addressed Under This Supplement Analysis (See App. A of the Watershed Management Program EIS): 2.1 Maintain Healthy Riparian Plant Communities, 4.12 Filter Strips, 6.1 Differed Grazing, 6.10 Access Fencing Location: Custer County, Idaho Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and the Custer Soil and Water Conservation District Description of the Proposed Action: The Bonneville Power Administration is proposing to fund the

486

DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Riverton Mill Site - WY 0-04  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Mill Site - WY 0-04 Mill Site - WY 0-04 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Riverton Mill Site (WY.0-04 ) Designated Name: Alternate Name: Location: Evaluation Year: Site Operations: Site Disposition: Radioactive Materials Handled: Primary Radioactive Materials Handled: Radiological Survey(s): Site Status: Also see Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site Documents Related to Riverton Mill Site Data Validation Package for the November 2008 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site. February 2009 U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Status and Planned Actions at the Riverton, Wyoming, Uranium Mill Tailing Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I Site April Gil, PhD Environment Team Lead Office of Legacy Management (LM) May 2, 20122 Status and Action Summary 􀂄 Surface