National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for lm fusrap program

  1. LM FUSRAP Fact Sheet | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FUSRAP Fact Sheet LM FUSRAP Fact Sheet LM FUSRAP Fact Sheet LM FUSRAP Fact Sheet (515.02 KB) More Documents & Publications FUSRAP Stakeholder Report FUSRAP Memorandum of Understanding FUSRAP Memorandum of Understanding

  2. FUSRAP Program Information | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    LM FUSRAP Program Fact Sheet FUSRAP Stakeholder Report (May 2013) Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites (Rev. 1, March 2012) Considered ...

  3. LM Program Update Newsletter

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Goal 6 LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan Released The U.S. Department of Energy Offce of Legacy Management (LM) is pleased to announce its newly released LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan. This is the fourth strategic plan since LM's inception in December 2003. Through the organization's continued growth and learning, LM has adopted more effective and effcient ways to carry out responsibilities to both people and the environment. While the LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan format remains the same as the 2011-2020

  4. Assessing and Implementing LTS&M Requirements for Remediation Sites Under the FUSRAP Program

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Assessing and Implementing LTS&M Requirements for Remediation Sites Under the FUSRAP Program (Waste Management Conference 2007)

  5. Polymer Composites Research in the LM Materials Program Overview |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Polymer Composites Research in the LM Materials Program Overview Polymer Composites Research in the LM Materials Program Overview 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, May 18-22, 2009 -- Washington D.C. lm_06_warren.pdf (2.67 MB) More Documents & Publications Composite Underbody Attachment Carbon Fiber Pilot Plant and Research Facilities Low Cost Carbon Fiber Overview

  6. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Hazelwood Interim Storage Site annual site environmental report. Calendar year 1985. [FUSRAP

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1986-04-01

    The Hazelwood Interim Storage Site (HISS) is presently used for the storage of low-level radioactively contaminated soils. Monitoring results show that the HISS is in compliance with DOE concentration guides and radiation protection standards. Derived Concentration Guides (DCGs) represent the concentrations of radionuclides in air or water that would limit the radiation dose to 100 mrem/y. The applicable limits have been revised since the 1984 environmental monitoring report was published. The limits applied in 1984 were based on a radiation protection standard of 500 mrem/y; the limits applied for 1985 are based on a standard of 100 mrem/y. The HISS is part of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP), a DOE program to decontaminate or otherwise control sites where low-level radioactive contamination remains from the early years of the nation's atomic energy program. To determine whether the site is in compliance with DOE standards, environmental measurements are expressed as percentages of the applicable DCG, while the calculated doses to the public are expressed as percentages of the applicable radiation protection standard. The monitoring program at the HISS measures uranium, radium, and thorium concentrations in surface water, groundwater, and sediment; radon gas concentrations in air; and external gamma radiation exposure rates. Potential radiation doses to the public are also calculated. The HISS was designated for remedial action under FUSRAP because radioactivity above applicable limits was found to exist at the site and its vicinity. Elevated levels of radiation still exist in areas where remedial action has not yet been completed.

  7. Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clayton, C.; Widdop, M.

    2006-07-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiated the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to address contamination remaining from Manhattan Engineer District and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission activities. The DOE Office of Legacy Management determines if a site is eligible for FUSRAP remediation and conducts long-term surveillance and maintenance activities to maintain protectiveness. Since 1997, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conducts site investigations and remedial action. Depending on final site conditions when remediation is completed, DOE post-closure care requirements may include inspection, environmental monitoring, management of institutional controls, records and data management, and stakeholder relations. (authors)

  8. Low Cost Carbon Fiber Research in the LM Materials Program Overview...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Research in the LM Materials Program Overview Low Cost Carbon Fiber Research in the LM ... More Documents & Publications Lower Cost Carbon Fiber Precursors FY 2009 Progress Report ...

  9. Radiation Protection Considerations at USACE Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Projects

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brown, S.H.

    2008-07-01

    The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) was initially authorized by Congress in 1974. FUSRAP was enacted to address residual radioactive contamination associated with numerous sites across the U.S. at which radioactive material (primarily Uranium ores and related milling products) had been processed in support of the nation's nuclear weapons program dating back to the Manhattan Project and the period immediately following World War II. In October 1997, Congress transferred the management of this program from the Department of Energy to the United States Corp of Engineers. Through this program, the Corps addresses the environmental remediation of certain sites once used by DOE's predecessor agencies, the Manhattan Engineer District and the Atomic Energy Commission. The waste at FUSRAP sites consists mainly of low levels of uranium, thorium and radium, along with some mixed wastes. Upon completion of remedial activities, these sites are transferred to DOE for long-term stewardship activities. This paper presents and contrasts the radiological conditions and recent monitoring results associated with five large ongoing FUSRAP projects including Maywood, N.J.; the Linde site near Buffalo, N.Y.; Colonie in Albany N.Y. and the St Louis, Mo. airport and downtown sites. The radiological characteristics of soil and debris at each site and respective regulatory clean up criteria is presented and contrasted. Some differences are discussed in the radiological characteristics of material at some sites that result in variations in radiation protection monitoring programs. Additionally, summary data for typical personnel radiation exposure monitoring results are presented. In summary: 1. The FUSRAP projects for which data and observations are reported in this paper are considered typical of the radiological nature of FUSRAP sites in general. 2. These sites are characterized by naturally occurring uranium and thorium series radionuclides in soil and debris, at

  10. FUSRAP Memorandum of Understanding | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Memorandum of Understanding FUSRAP Memorandum of Understanding FUSRAP Memorandum of Understanding FUSRAP Memorandum of Understanding (275.95 KB) More Documents & Publications FUSRAP Memorandum of Understanding Memorandum of Understanding Implementation of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program: Coordination Between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

  11. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, October¬タモDecember 2010

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    0 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the October-December 2010 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management See page for a map of LM sites. 14 See page 15 for a more detailed version of LM's goals. Legacy Management Goals Goal 5 Office of Legacy Management Receives Management

  12. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, April¬タモJune 2011

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    p r i l - J u n e 2 0 1 1 Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the April-June 2011 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update. This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management On May 31, 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) completed a comprehensive 18-month effort to evaluate the

  13. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, April¬タモJune 2012

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the April-June 2012 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management U.S. Representative Scott Tipton of Colorado's 3rd Congressional District visited the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management (LM) Grand Junction, site in

  14. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, January¬タモMarch 2012

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the January-March 2012 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management In February 2011, the Office of Legacy Management (LM) began work as part of an interagency effort to develop a design for the disposal of material from the Northeast Church

  15. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, July¬タモSeptember 2011

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    1 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the July-September 2011 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management On July 27, 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) completed the long-term monitoring of Amchitka Island, an event that occurs once

  16. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update: July¬タモSeptember 2012

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2 Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the July-September 2012 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update. This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management Goal 2 LM Communication and Stakeholder Satisfaction Independent Survey The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management is currently conducting a community and

  17. St. Louis FUSRAP Lessons Learned

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Eberlin, J.; Williams, D.; Mueller, D.

    2003-02-26

    The purpose of this paper is to present lessons learned from fours years' experience conducting Remedial Investigation and Remedial Action activities at the St. Louis Downtown Site (SLDS) under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Many FUSRAP sites are experiencing challenges conducting Remedial Actions within forecasted volume and budget estimates. The St. Louis FUSRAP lessons learned provide insight to options for cost effective remediation at FUSRAP sites. The lessons learned are focused on project planning (budget and schedule), investigation, design, and construction.

  18. LM's New Role for the DOE Title X Reimbursement Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    In May 2011, the Title X claim review and audit function was transferred from the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) to the Office of Legacy Management (LM).

  19. FUSRAP Stakeholder Report | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FUSRAP Stakeholder Report FUSRAP Stakeholder Report The U.S.Department of Energy (DOE) has operated the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) since 1974. During that time,we have accomplished many activities to identify and remediate to a safe condition sites that became contaminated with radioactive materials in support of the nation's early atomic energy programs. FUSRAP Stakeholder Report, May 2013 (1.87 MB) More Documents & Publications Recent Developments in DOE

  20. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, January¬タモMarch 2011

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    1 - Visit us at www.lm.doe.gov Welcome to the January-March 2011 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) . This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to . Program Update lm@hq.doe.gov Program Update Legacy Management Contracts were recently awarded to two charter vessels that will transport equipment and personnel to the island of Amchitka, Alaska, for the 2011 biological sampling and

  1. DOE/OR/20722-22 UC-70A DBaffu Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    22 UC-70A DBaffu Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. DE-ACO5-81OR20722 c P c P RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE DUPONT CHAMBER WORKS PLANT Deepwater, New Jersey Bechtel National, Inc. Advanced Technology Division June 1984 Technical Information Center Office of Scientific and Technical Information U.S. Department of Energy -- .,,.... - ~S",.W -. - - -. _ -- --- --.- ----.-- ___ ..---. -.~ LEGAL NOTICE ' I91i.m report war prepared u M account of work

  2. FUSRAP Overview | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Overview FUSRAP Overview FUSRAP Overview (Waste Management Conference 2006) FUSRAP Overview (Waste Management Conference 2006) (455.79 KB) More Documents & Publications Process for ...

  3. Middlesex Sampling Plant annual environmental report for calendar year 1991, Middlesex, New Jersey. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1992-09-01

    This document describes the environmental monitoring program at the-Middlesex Sampling Plant (MSP) and surrounding area, implementation of the program, and monitoring results for 1991. Environmental monitoring of MSP began in 1980 when Congress added the site to the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP is a DOE program to decontaminate or otherwise control sites where residual radioactive materials remain from the early years of the nation`s atomic energy program or from commercial operations causing conditions that Congress has authorized DOE to remedy. The environmental monitoring program at MSP includes sampling networks for radon and thoron concentrations in air; external gamma radiation exposure; and radium-226, thorium-232, and total uranium concentrations in surface water, sediment,, and groundwater. Additionally, several nonradiological parameters are measured in groundwater, surface water, and sediment. Results of environmental monitoring during 1991 indicate that most concentrations were well below applicable guidelines. The potential radiation dose calculated for a hypothetical maximally exposed individual, based on a conservative but realistic exposure scenario, is 2.3 mrem (milliroentgen equivalent man) per year, which is less than an individual would receive while traveling in an airplane at 12,000 meters for five hours. During 1991, there were no nonroutine releases from the site; MSP was in compliance with applicable regulations for releases from the site. Site activities included environmental monitoring, site maintenance, onsite characterization for the MSP remedial investigation, and additional sediment sampling at the plant outfall to determine the source of the elevated levels of radium-226 and thorium-232.

  4. About LM (LM-1)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Legacy Management (LM), reporting directly to the Under Secretary for Management and Performance, manages the Department's legacy responsibilities resulting from the nuclear weapons...

  5. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, January¬タモMarch...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... Center for Energy and Environmental Research Oxnard Laboratory for Energy- Related Health Research Middlesex North Amchitka Alaska UMTRCA Title I CERCLARCRA UMTRCA Title II FUSRAP ...

  6. Programming Hybrid HPC Systems

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Programmatic Framework Programmatic Framework PROGRAM FACT SHEETS FUSRAP Nevada Offsites UMTRCA Title I and II PROGRAM TYPES UMTRCA Title I Sites UMTRCA Title II Sites FUSRAP Sites D&D Sites Nevada Offsites CERCLA/RCRA Sites NWPA Section 151 Site Other UMTRCA Title I Disposal and Processing Sites (Regulatory Drivers) For UMTRCA Title I disposal sites managed by LM, DOE becomes a licensee to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Inspection, reporting, and record-keeping requirements

  7. DOE/LM-1469

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    DOE/LM-1469

  8. Microsoft Word - LM SMG Jan 2016 Update 18 Draft 12 no links...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ... LM Site Name Pre-LM Name Category Transferring Organization Regulatory Driver 1 Deepwater, NJ, Site DuPont Chambers Works 2 USACE FUSRAP 2 St. Louis, MO, Site St. Louis Downtown ...

  9. Office of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update, April¬タモJune...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    LM maintains a long-standing relationship with both the Navajo Nation and Hopi Tribe. The Navajo and Hopi tribal representatives traveled to Grand Junction, Colorado, at LM's ...

  10. Understanding LM-79 Reports

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    none,

    2012-03-01

    Solid-state lighting program technology fact sheet that discusses typical content of laboratory reports summarizing LM-79 test results for integrated SSL lamps and luminaires.

  11. LM 22-16

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    NEPA ID: LM 22-16Short Title: Plowshare Program Site Visits in Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah, and WyomingDetermination: A9 and B3.2

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Adrian_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Michigan Adrian, Michigan, Site FUSRAP Site adrian Background-The Adrian Site in Adrian, Michigan, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Adrian Site was operated by Bridgeport Brass Company in the 1950s. Uranium metal was extruded at the site for use in the fabrication of fuel

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oakridge_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Tennessee Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Warehouses Site FUSRAP Site Oak Ridge Warehouses Map Background-The Oak Ridge Warehouses Site, located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Oak Ridge Warehouses Site was used in the early 1940s by the Manhattan Engineer

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Seymour_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Connecticut Seymour, Connecticut, Site FUSRAP Site Seymour Map Background-The Seymour, Connecticut, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-Research and development of a natural uranium metal extrusion process was performed at the Seymour Site for AEC from 1962 to 1964.

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Acid_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Acid/Pueblo Canyon, New Mexico, Site FUSRAP Site Acid/Pueblo Canyon Map Background-The Acid/Pueblo Canyon Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-The Acid/Pueblo Canyon Site, owned by Los Alamos County, is located in the Pajarito Plateau Region near Los Alamos,

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Albany_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Oregon Albany, Oregon, Site FUSRAP Site albany Background-The Albany, Oregon, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Albany Site is owned by the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Metallurgical research was conducted at this site for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the Energy

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Aliquippa2_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pennsylvania Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, Site FUSRAP Site Aliquippa Map Background-The Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations History-At the Aliquippa site, the Vulcan Crucible Steel Company heated and rolled uranium metal into rods for the AEC from 1948 to

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bayo_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Bayo Canyon, New Mexico, Site FUSRAP Site Bayo Canyon Map Background-The Bayo Canyon, New Mexico, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-The Bayo Canyon Site, owned by Los Alamos County, is located in the Pajarito Plateau Region near Los Alamos, New Mexico.

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Berkeley_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    California Berkeley, California, Site FUSRAP Site Berkeley Map Background-The Berkeley, California, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-Gilman Hall is a four-story building on the campus of the University of California, Berkeley. Floors, wood sills, walls, and baseboards in

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Beverly_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Massachusetts Beverly, Massachusetts, Site FUSRAP Site Beverly Map Background-The Beverly, Massachusetts, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-From 1942 to 1948, the Metal Hydrides Corporation, which became the Ventron Corporation in 1965, conducted uranium processing

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Brunswick2_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Jersey New Brunswick, New Jersey, Site FUSRAP Site New Brunswick Map Background-The New Brunswick, New Jersey, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-From 1948 to 1977, the Manhattan Engineer District and AEC operated the New Brunswick Site as a general nuclear chemistry

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Buffalo_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    York Buffalo, New York, Site FUSRAP Site Buffalo Map Background-The Buffalo, New York, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-In 1952, the Bliss and Laughlin Steel Company machined and straightened uranium rods under subcontract to National Lead of Ohio, a prime AEC

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- BurrisPark_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    California Burris Park, California, Site FUSRAP Site BurrisPark Background- The Burris Park, California, Site is located in Kings County, California, in the Central Valley south of Fresno. The site was remediated by the University of California-Davis and DOE has assumed long-term care responsibilities under the Formerly Utilized Site Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S.

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ChicNorth_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    North, Illinois, Site FUSRAP Site Chicago North Map Background-The Chicago North, Illinois, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Chicago North Site is owned by the State of Illinois and used as a National Guard Armory. Between 1942 and 1951, the Manhattan Engineer

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ChicSouth_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    South, Illinois, Site FUSRAP Site chicagosouth Background-The Chicago South, Illinois, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-In 1941, the National Defense Research Committee contracted the University of Chicago to construct a uranium and graphite pile to investigate the

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chupadera_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Mexico Chupadera Mesa, New Mexico, Site FUSRAP Site Chupadera Mesa Map Background-The Chupadera Mesa, New Mexico, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-The Chupadera Mesa Site is privately owned land northeast of the White Sands Missile Range and the city of Bingham

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ColumbusEast_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Columbus East, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Columbus East Map Background-The Columbus East Site in Columbus, Ohio, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-At the Columbus East Site uranium metal was heated and extruded into rods for the Manhattan Engineer District, contaminating building

  8. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fairfield_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Fairfield, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Fairfield Map Background-The Fairfield, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-In 1956, uranium metal was machined and shaped at the site for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, contaminating interior building surfaces, drains, equipment,

  9. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Granite2_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Illinois Granite City, Illinois Site FUSRAP Site Granite Map Background-The Granite City Site, located in Granite City, Illinois, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-In the late 1950s and early 1960s, two federal government-owned betatron particle accelerators were used at the

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hamilton_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Hamilton, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Hamilton Map Background-The Hamilton, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-Intermittently from 1943 to 1951, the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company fabricated slugs from rolled natural uranium metal stock for use by the Manhattan

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Indianorchard_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Massachusetts Indian Orchard, Massachusetts, Site FUSRAP Site Indian Orchard Map Background-The Indian Orchard Site, located in Indian Orchard, Massachusetts, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Indian Orchard Site is privately owned. Interior surfaces of a building at this

  12. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- JerseyCity_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Jersey Jersey City, New Jersey, Site FUSRAP Site Jersey City Map Background-The Jersey City, New Jersey, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Kellex Corporation was formed in 1943 to conduct engineering research in gaseous diffusion for uranium enrichment for the

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Madison_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Illinois Madison, Illinois, Site FUSRAP Site Madison Map Background-The Madison Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-During the late 1950s and early 1960s, the Dow Metal Products Division of Dow Chemical Company machined and shaped uranium metal and straightened

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- NewYork_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New York, New York, Site FUSRAP Site New York Map Background-The New York, New York, Site, in Manhattan, was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The New York Site was used by the Manhattan Engineer District in the early 1940s for the short-term storage of uranium concentrates that

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Niagara VP_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties, New York, Site FUSRAP Site Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties Map Background-The Niagara Falls Vicinity Properties Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties, located near Lewiston, New York, consists

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oxford_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Oxford, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Oxford Map Background-The Oxford, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. History-Uranium metal machining at the Oxford Site from 1952 to 1957 for AEC resulted in contamination of the site and several nearby (vicinity) properties, all of

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Painesville_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Painesville, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Painesville Background-The Painesville, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-In the early 1940s, the Defense Plant Corporation financed construction of a magnesium production facility on property acquired by the federal

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Springdale_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pennsylvania Springdale, Pennsylvania, Site FUSRAP Site Springdale Map Background-The Springdale, Pennsylvania, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-The Springdale Site was a privately owned metal fabrication shop that provided uranium metal machining services to the

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Toledo_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Toledo, Ohio, Site FUSRAP Site Toledo Map Background-The Toledo, Ohio, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-During the early and mid-1940s, Baker Brothers, Inc., fabricated slugs from natural uranium metal for the Manhattan Engineer District. In 1992, DOE designated the

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Tonawanda_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New York Tonawanda North, New York, Site, Units 1 and 2 FUSRAP Site Tonawanda North Site, Units 1 and 2 Background-Units 1 and 2 of the Tonawanda North, New York, Site were remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-From 1944 to 1946, uranium ore processing residues were transported from

  1. Hazelwood Interim Storage Site, Hazelwood, Missouri: Annual site environmental report, Calendar year 1987: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). [FUSRAP

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1988-04-01

    The monitoring program at the HISS measures radon concentrations in air; external gamma radiation levels; and uranium, radium, and thorium concentrations in surface water, groundwater, and sediment. To verify that the site is in compliance with the DOE radiation protection standard (100 mrem/yr) and assess its potential effect on public health, the radiation dose was calculated for the maximally exposed individual. Based on the scenario described in this report, the maximally exposed individual at the HISS would receive an annual external exposure approximately equivalent to 1 percent of the DOE radiation protection standard of 100 mrem/yr. This exposure is less than the exposure a person would receive during a round-trip flight from New York to Los Angeles (because of the greater amounts of cosmic radiation at higher altitudes). The cumulative dose to the population within an 80-km (50-mi) radius of the HISS that would result from radioactive materials present at the site would be indistinguishable from the dose that the same population would receive from naturally occurring radioactive sources. The results of 1987 monitoring show that the HISS is in compliance with the DOE radiation protection standard. 12 refs., 6 figs., 11 tabs.

  2. Middlesex Sampling Plant and Middlesex Municipal Landfill. Annual site environmental report, calendar year 1985. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). [FUSRAP

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1986-08-01

    The monitoring program at the Middlesex Sampling Plant (MSP) and Middlesex Municipal Landfill (MML) measures uranium and radium concentrations in surface water, groundwater, and sediment; radon gas concentrations in air; and external gamma radiation dose rates. Potential radiation doses to the public are also calculated. During 1985, the highest annual average radon levels in air at the MML and MSP were 10% and 17%, respectively, of the Derived Concentration Guides (DCG). The highest annual average gamma dose rate at the MSP was 167 mrem/y; at the MML the highest annual average dose rate was 13 mrem/y. The highest average annual concentrations of uranium in surface water monitored at the MSP and MML were 13% and 1%, respectively, of the DOE DCG. The highest annual average concentrations of /sup 226/Ra in surface water were 3.3 and 0.8%, respectively, of the applicable DOE DCG. The highest annual average uranium concentration in groundwater at the MSP was about 9% of the DCG; the highest /sup 226/Ra concentration was 0.7% of the respective DCG. The corresponding values for the MML were 0.5 and 3.3%. The highest annual average concentrations of uranium and /sup 226/Ra in sediments at the MSP were 7.7 and 3.5 pCi/g, respectively. The highest uranium concentration at the MML was 3.3 pCi/g, while the highest /sup 226/Ra concentration was 0.7 pCi/g. The calculated total radiation dose to the maximally exposed individual at the MSP, considering several pathways, was 10.5 mrem or 11% of the radiation protection standard; at the MML, it was 0.14 mrem or less than 1% of the radiation protection standard.

  3. LM Brochure

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Legacy Management U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 03/2011 This document was printed on paper manufactured with post-consumer waste as part of LM's commitment to environmental responsibility. Sites in LM Through FY 2020 Requiring LTS&M

  4. Fall Protection Procedures for Sealing Bulk Waste Shipments by Rail Cars at Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Sites - 13509

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Boyle, J.D.; Fort, E. Joseph; Lorenz, William; Mills, Andy

    2013-07-01

    Rail-cars loaded with radioactive materials must be closed and fastened to comply with United States Department of Transportation (DOT) requirements before they shipped. Securing waste shipments in a manner that meets these regulations typically results in the use of a sealable rail-car liner. Workers accessing the tops of the 2.74 m high rail-cars to seal and inspect liners for compliance prior to shipment may be exposed to a fall hazard. Relatively recent revisions to the Fall Protection requirements in the Safety and Health Requirements Manual (EM385-1-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) have necessitated modifications to the fall protection systems previously employed for rail-car loading at Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) sites. In response these projects have developed site-specific procedures to protect workers and maintain compliance with the improved fall protection regulations. (authors)

  5. Consolidated Online Data Management Strategy in Support of Environmental Remediation Activities at the Dupont Chambers Works Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (Fusrap) Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nelson, K.A.; Desai, N.B.; Samus, J.E.; Bock, G.O.

    2007-07-01

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has developed and implemented an innovative online data management application in support of site characterization and remediation activities at the DuPont Chambers Works Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Site. The password-protected, web-based application was implemented to centralize project data, facilitate project communications, and provide a large and diverse group of project team members with access to the data and analytical tools they need to efficiently and effectively manage the ongoing characterization and remediation efforts. Centralizing resources using the online application and web-based strategy streamlines data access and communications, allowing the team to effectively keep the project on track while reducing the costs associated with data requests, data duplication, document review and retrieval, software requirements, and lapses in communication or data transfer. (authors)

  6. New Brunswick Site annual environmental report for calendar year 1991, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1992-09-01

    This document describes the environmental monitoring program at the New Brunswick Site (NBS) and surrounding area, implementation of the program, and monitoring results for 1991. The site, near New Brunswick,, New Jersey, is a 5.6-acre vacant, fenced, and grass-covered area. Environmental monitoring of NBS began in 1981 when the site was part of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Surplus Facilities Management Program. In 1990 responsibility for NBS was transferred to the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSP.4P). FUSRAP is a DOE program to identify and decontaminate or otherwise control sites where residual radioactive materials remain from the,early years of the nation`s atomic energy program or from commercial operations causing conditions that Congress has authorized DOE to remedy. The environmental monitoring program at NBS includes sampling networks for radon and thoron in air; external gamma radiation exposure; and radium-226, radium-228, thorium-228, thorium-230, thorium-232, americium-241, cesium-137, plutonium-239, and total uranium in surface water, sediment, and groundwater. Several nonradiological parameters are also measured in groundwater, surface water, and sediments. Monitoring results are compared with applicable Environmental Protection Agency standards, DOE derived concentration guides, dose limits, and other requirements in DOE orders. Environmental standards are established to protect public health and the environment.

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Wayne_FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    New Jersey Wayne, New Jersey, Site FUSRAP Site Wayne Map Background-The Wayne, New Jersey, Site was remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). FUSRAP was established in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission operations. History-Rare Earths, Inc. and then W.R. Grace and Company operated the 6.5-acre site as a rare earth and thorium processing facility from 1948 to 1971.

  8. Wayne Interim Storage Site environmental report for calendar year 1992, 868 Black Oak Ridge Road, Wayne, New Jersey. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-05-01

    This report describes the environmental surveillance program at the Wayne Interim Storage Site (WISS) and provides the results for 1992. The fenced, site, 32 km (20 mi) northwest of Newark, New Jersey, was used between 1948 and 1971 for commercial processing of monazite sand to separate natural radioisotopes - predominantly thorium. Environmental surveillance of WISS began in 1984 in accordance with Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5400.1 when Congress added the site to DOE`s Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The environmental surveillance program at WISS includes sampling networks for radon and thoron in air; external gamma radiation exposure; radium-226, radium-228, thorium-230, thorium-232, total uranium, and several chemicals in surface water and sediment; and total uranium, radium-226, radium-228, thorium-230, thorium-232, and organic and inorganic chemicals in groundwater. Monitoring results are compared with applicable Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state standards, DOE derived concentration guides (DCGs), dose limits, and other DOE requirements. This monitoring program assists in fulfilling the DOE policy of measuring and monitoring effluents from DOE activities and calculating hypothetical doses. Results for environmental surveillance in 1992 show that the concentrations of all radioactive and most chemical contaminants were below applicable standards.

  9. Recent Developments in DOE FUSRAP - 13014

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clayton, Christopher; Kothari, Vijendra; Hooten, Gwen; Starr, Ken; Bahrke, Cheri; Gillespie, Joey; Widdop, Michael; Darr, Bob

    2013-07-01

    The DOE Office of Legacy Management assumed responsibility for the DOE FUSRAP in 2003. Since then, DOE has evaluated existing guidance and program needs to ensure that the program will remain effective in maintaining protectiveness at remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE has identified crucial elements that must be addressed to meet this goal. Knowledge of the sites and the program must be preserved and accessible to future custodians. Program processes must be defined and coordinated with other agencies. Long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS and M) requirements for the sites must be based on human health risk and regulatory compliance, and those requirements must be well defined. Useful and accurate program information must be available to stakeholders. DOE has addressed these needs through development of a comprehensive program plan, an LTS and M plan for each completed FUSRAP site, a records finding aid, and a public information web site. These developments help ensure that the current knowledge is preserved and passed on to future custodians and stakeholders. (authors)

  10. Low Cost Carbon Fiber Research in the LM Materials Program Overview

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    2009 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, May 18-22, 2009 -- Washington D.C.

  11. Process for Transition of Responsibilities for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Sites from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to the U.S. Department of Energy for Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clayton, C.; Widdop, M.

    2006-07-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) is the long-term custodian of sites remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is responsible for characterization, assessment, remedy selection, and remedial action of FUSRAP sites. Site responsibilities are transferred from USACE to DOE-LM when the implemented remedy is demonstrated to be functioning as designed. Coordination of site transfer follows prescribed processes to ensure that DOE acquires the knowledge and information to maintain the site remedy and site protectiveness. (authors)

  12. St. Louis FUSRAP-A Strategy for Success

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lyerla, M.; Fox, B.; Chinnock, J.; Haase, A.; Wojinski, S.; Bretz, M.; Cotner, S.; Dellorco, L.; Mueller, D.; Roberts, S.; Overmohle, D.

    2002-02-27

    In October 1997, Congress transferred the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) from the Department of Energy (DOE) to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). FUSRAP addresses contamination generated by activities of the Manhattan Engineering District and the Atomic Energy Commission during the 1940's and 50's in support of the nation's nuclear weapons development program. The USACE Operation Order for FUSRAP gave responsibility for remediation of five sites in Missouri and Illinois to the USACESt. Louis District. The principal site is the St. Louis Airport Site (SLAPS), which involves the removal, transportation, disposal, and restoration of approximately 28 acres and 245,000 bank cubic yards (bcy) of contaminated soils. This paper will focus on the progress and achievements in removal action efficiencies of the SLAPS team. This team consists primarily of the USACE and Stone & Webster, Incorporated.

  13. LM Issues Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on the Uranium Leasing Program

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has released the Final Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) to the public. The document can be found on the DOE Office of...

  14. Assessing and Implementing Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated Sites Under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clayton, C.; Widdop, M.

    2007-07-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiated the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to address concerns about radiological conditions at locations where work was performed for the Manhattan Engineer District and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. The DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) is responsible for 27 FUSRAP sites and will ultimately assume responsibility for more than 50 FUSRAP sites. DOE-LM assumed responsibility for 25 FUSRAP sites in 2004 and began an assessment of site conditions to ensure that complete site knowledge was preserved in DOE records and that the sites are and will remain protective of human health and the environment. For the assessment, site conditions were assumed to be dynamic. Therefore, the most restrictive site exposure scenarios were considered, as well as the implications for disturbing materials to which supplemental limits were applied. If conditions under these possible future scenarios were found to be protective, no use restrictions were needed. However, if future use or exposure scenarios could result in potential unacceptable risk, restrictions on site use were indicated. The assessment relied on access to documentation of site activities, characteristics, remedial action activities, remediated conditions, and land-use restrictions. In addition, an ongoing program of site visits commenced in 2005. DOE-LM assessed the level of knowledge and sought to identify and preserve site information for use by future custodians. DOE-LM has applied lessons learned in site management since 1989, when a formal DOE program was established to implement long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS and M) activities. Former FUSRAP staff members with the DOE Office of Environmental Management also conveyed lessons learned. We present the assessment process that was used, the application of results, and a framework for evaluating LTS and M requirements for FUSRAP sites. (authors)

  15. LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan This is our fourth strategic plan since LM was established in December 2003. LM is charged with providing a long-term, sustainable solution to the legacy of the Cold War. LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan (10.16 MB) More Documents & Publications Program Update: 2nd Quarter 2016 Program Update: 3rd Quarter 2015 Office of Legacy Management's Strategic Plan 2016-2025

  16. LM Program Update Newsletter

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Updated Radiation Exhibit Unveiled at Math and Science Center in Grand Junction, Colorado ... Goal 6 Updated Radiation Exhibit Unveiled at Math and Science Center in Grand Junction, ...

  17. LM Program Update Newsletter

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Deputy Under Secretary Klaus Visits the Fernald Preserve in Ohio ...... 1 Preservationists Tour Historic Log Cabin at the Grand Junction, ...

  18. LM Program Update Newsletter

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    ... EEOICPA requests increased from FY 2014 to FY 2015. The largest percentage increase was due to former workers from the Grand Junction, Colorado, facilities, followed by requests by ...

  19. LM Program Update Newsletter

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    ... A duplicate copy of the external hard drive containing ADIIS supplemental environmental impact statements is being created for storage at the Grand Junction, Colorado, offce. The ...

  20. LM Wind Power formerly LM Glasfiber AS | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Wind Power formerly LM Glasfiber AS Jump to: navigation, search Name: LM Wind Power (formerly LM Glasfiber AS) Place: Kolding, Denmark Zip: 6000 Sector: Wind energy Product:...

  1. Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This document summarizes radiological conditions at sites remediated under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) and transferred to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for...

  2. Ocean FUSRAP: feasibility of ocean disposal of materials from the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Progam (FUSRAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kupferman, S.L.; Anderson, D.R.; Brush, L.H.; Gomez, L.S.; Laul, J.C.; Shephard, L.E.

    1982-01-01

    The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) of the Department of Energy is designed to identify and evaluate the radiological conditions at sites formerly used by the Corps of Engineers Manhattan Engineer District and the US Atomic Energy Commission. Where required, remedial action will be instituted to remove potential restrictions on the use of the sites due to residual low-level radioactive contamination. A total of 31 sites that may require remedial action has been identified. The purpose of the Ocean FUSRAP Program, which began in March 1981, is to assess the technical, environmental, and institutional feasibility of disposing, in the ocean and on the ocean floor, of FUSRAP soil and rubble which contains traces of natural radioactive materials. The initial focus has been on the Middlesex, New Jersey, Sampling Plant site and surrounding properties, which contain on the order of 100,000 metric tons of material. The Belgian Congo uranium ore and other uranium ores used by the United States were handled at the sampling plant site. In studying the feasibility of ocean disposal of FUSRAP material from Middlesex, New Jersey, we have begun to examine institutional requirements to be met, the composition of the source material with regard to its inventory of toxic chemical and radiochemical components and the impact of the source material in the marine environment. To date we have found nothing that would preclude safe and inexpensive disposal of this material in the ocean.

  3. Remediation and Recycling of Linde FUSRAP Materials

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Coutts, P. W.; Franz, J. P.; Rehmann, M. R.

    2002-02-27

    During World War II, the Manhattan Engineering District (MED) utilized facilities in the Buffalo, New York area to extract natural uranium from uranium-bearing ores. The Linde property is one of several properties within the Tonawanda, New York Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) site, which includes Linde, Ashland 1, Ashland 2, and Seaway. Union Carbide Corporation's Linde Division was placed under contract with the Manhattan Engineering District (MED) from 1942 to 1946 to extract uranium from seven different ore sources: four African pitchblende ores and three domestic ores. Over the years, erosion and weathering have spread contamination from the residuals handled and disposed of at Linde to adjacent soils. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) negotiated a Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) governing remediation of the Linde property. In Fiscal Year (FY) 1998, Congress transferred cleanup management responsibility for the sites in the FUSRAP program, including the Linde Site, from the DOE to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), with the charge to commence cleanup promptly. All actions by the USACE at the Linde Site are being conducted subject to the administrative, procedural, and regulatory provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the existing FFA. USACE issued a Proposed Plan for the Linde Property in 1999 and a Final Record of Decision (ROD) in 2000. USACE worked with the local community near the Tonawanda site, and after considering public comment, selected the remedy calling for removing soils that exceed the site-specific cleanup standard, and transporting the contaminated material to off-site locations. The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment, complies with Federal and State requirements, and meets commitments to the community.

  4. LM 32-15

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NEPA ID: LM 32-15 Short Title: Install Four New Groundwater Monitoring Wells at the Shiprock, New Mexico, Disposal Site Determination: B3.1

  5. LM 32-15

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NEPA ID: LM 32-15Short Title: Install Four New Groundwater Monitoring Wells at the Shiprock, New Mexico, Disposal SiteDetermination: B3.1

  6. LM 05-16

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NEPA ID: LM 05-16 Short Title: Air Stripper Removal and Disposal at the Pinellas County, Florida, Site Determination: B1.24

  7. LM 04-16

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NEPA ID: LM 04-16 Short Title: Conduct Pedogenesis Study at the Falls City, Texas, Disposal Site Determination: B3.1

  8. Lessons Learned from a Complex FUSRAP Site - Sylvania Corning FUSRAP Site - 12269

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ewy, Ann; Hays, David

    2012-07-01

    Since its addition to the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 2005, the Sylvania Corning FUSRAP Site (the Site) in Hicksville, New York, has provided challenges and opportunities from which to gain lessons learned for conducting investigation work at a complex multi-contaminant FUSRAP Site. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and its contractors conducted a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Remedial Investigation (RI) and are currently in the Feasibility Study (FS) phase at the Site. This paper presents the planning, execution, and reporting lessons learned by USACE during the RI/FS. The Site, operated from 1952 to 1967 for the research, development, and fabrication of nuclear elements under the Atomic Energy Commission, and other government and commercial contracts. Previous investigations performed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the current property owner have identified uranium, thorium, nickel, and chlorinated solvents, as Site contaminants [1]. The property owner is currently under two separate voluntary agreements with NYSDEC to investigate and remediate the Site. USACE's work at the site has been independent of this voluntary agreement and has moved on a parallel path with any work the property owner has completed. The project at the Site is complex because of the radiological and chemical concerns in both soils and groundwater, high hydraulically conductive soils, lack of a shallow aquiclude/aquitard, and a principal water table aquifer underlying the site. Contaminants are migrating from the Site and may potentially impact local drinking water supplies (municipal wells). During the RI/FS process the project team has encountered many issues and has thus developed many resolutions. The issues are organized into three categories: Planning and Contracting, Execution, and Reporting. Planning and Contracting lessons learned include: how

  9. LM Issues Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Issues Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on the Uranium Leasing Program LM Issues Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on the Uranium Leasing Program ...

  10. LM 21-16

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    NEPA ID: LM 21-16Short Title: Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operations at the Moab, Utah, Disposal SiteDetermination: B3.1 and B3.2

  11. LM 12-13

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    NEPA ID: LM 12-13Determination: B1.3Short Title: Road maintenance on roads used to access groundwater monitoring wells south of the Tuba City, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailing Remedial Action (UMTRA)...

  12. ABOUT OSO (LM-20)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Site Operations (OSO) is responsible for implementing long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) at sites transferred to the Office of Legacy Management (LM) to ensure...

  13. LM Significant Environmental Aspects

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    LM evaluates all of our activities for their potential impact on the environment, and identifies those aspects that could have a significant impact if they were not controlled. This information is...

  14. ABOUT OBO (LM-10)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Business Operations (OBO) is responsible for records and information management associated with more than 90 sites that are closed and no longer support a DOE mission.  LM-10 also...

  15. LM 21-14

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NEPA ID: LM 21-14 Determinations: B3.1, B6.1, B6.2 Short Title: Onsite and Offsite Bioremediation Injections and Related Activities at the Pinellas County, Florida, Site

  16. LM 16-15

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NEPA ID: LM 16-15Short Title: Remove and reuse/recycle sulfuric acid from an onsite tank at the Tuba City, AZ disposal site.Determination: B1.28

  17. LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Energy Employees Occupational

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Illness Compensation Program Act, Office of Legacy Management | Department of Energy Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Energy Employees

  18. Supplement No. 2 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Verification and

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Certification Protocol | Department of Energy 2 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Verification and Certification Protocol Supplement No. 2 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Verification and Certification Protocol Supplement No. 2 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Verification and Certification Protocol (November 1985, Rev. 1) Supplement No. 2 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Verification and Certification Protocol (November 1985, Rev. 1) (1.14 MB) More Documents & Publications Supplement

  19. Draft LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... LM is responsible for auditing claims submitted by uraniumthorium mill site licensees to determine if costs are eligible for reimbursement under the Title X program. We would ...

  20. LM FIMS Database

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Several U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) projects were completed and updated in the Facilities Information Management System (FIMS) this year. FIMS is DOE’s real property database that stores data related to land and anything permanently affixed to it, such as buildings, fences, and roads.

  1. About the Asset Management Team (LM-20.3) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Asset Management Team (LM-20.3) About the Asset Management Team (LM-20.3) The Asset Management Team (AMT) is based in Westminster, Colorado. The AMT provides cross-cutting support to other LM programs in the areas of facilities management and security, personal property and real property management, and fleet. The AMT also manages LM's joint federal/contractor Environmental Management System (EMS) program that addresses both environmental compliance and sustainability. Lastly, the AMT manages LM

  2. Middlesex Sampling Plant environmental report for calendar year 1992, 239 Mountain Avenue, Middlesex, New Jersey. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-05-01

    This report describes the environmental surveillance program at the Middlesex Sampling Plant (MSP) and provides the results for 1992. The site, in the Borough of Middlesex, New Jersey, is a fenced area and includes four buildings and two storage piles that contain 50,800 m{sup 3} of radioactive and mixed hazardous waste. More than 70 percent of the MSP site is paved with asphalt. The MSP facility was established in 1943 by the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) to sample, store, and/or ship uranium, thorium, and beryllium ores. In 1955 the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), successor to MED, terminated the operation and later used the site for storage and limited sampling of thorium residues. In 1967 AEC activities ceased, onsite structures were decontaminated, and the site was certified for unrestricted use under criteria applicable at that time. In 1980 the US Department of Energy (DOE) initiated a multiphase remedial action project to clean up several vicinity properties onto which contamination from the plant had migrated. Material from these properties was consolidated into the storage piles onsite. Environmental surveillance of MSP began in 1980 when Congress added the site to DOE`s Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. The environmental surveillance program at MSP includes sampling networks for radon and thoron in air; external gamma radiation exposure; and radium-226, radium-228, thorium-230, thorium-232, and total uranium in surface water, sediment, and groundwater. Additionally, chemical analyses are performed to detect metals and organic compounds in surface water and groundwater and metals in sediments. This program assists in fulfilling th DOE policy of measuring and monitoring effluents from DOE activities and calculating hypothetical doses.

  3. Niagara Falls Storage Site environmental report for calendar year 1992, 1397 Pletcher Road, Lewiston, New York. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-05-01

    This report describes the environmental surveillance program at the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) and provides the results for 1992. From 1944 to the present, the primary use of NFSS has been storage of radioactive residues produced as a by-product of uranium production. All onsite areas of residual radioactivity above guidelines have been remediated. Materials generated during remediation are stored onsite in the 4-ha (10-acre) waste containment structure (WCS). The WCS is a clay-lined, clay-capped, and grass-covered storage pile. The environmental surveillance program at NFSS includes sampling networks for radon concentrations in air; external gamma radiation exposure; and total uranium and radium-226 concentrations in surface water, sediments, and groundwater. Several chemical parameters, including seven metals, are also routinely measured in groundwater. This surveillance program assists in fulfilling the DOE policy of measuring and monitoring effluents from DOE activities and calculating hypothetical doses. Monitoring results are compared with applicable Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) standards, DOE derived concentration guides (DCGs), dose limits, and other DOE requirements. Results of environmental monitoring during 1992 indicate that levels of the parameters measured were in compliance with all but one requirement: Concentrations of iron and manganese in groundwater were above NYSDEC groundwater quality standards. However, these elements occur naturally in the soils and groundwater associated with this region. In 1992 there were no environmental occurrences or reportable quantity releases.

  4. Niagara Falls Storage Site, Lewiston, New York: Annual site environmental report, Calendar year 1987: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1988-04-01

    The monitoring program at the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) measures radon gas concentrations in air; external gamma radiation levels; and uranium and radium concentrations in surface water, groundwater, and sediment. To verify that the site is in compliance with the DOE radiation protection standard and to assess its potential effect on public health, the radiation dose was calculated for the maximally exposed individual. Based on the conservative scenario described in the report, this individual would receive an annual external exposure approximately equivalent to 6 percent of the DOE radiation protection standard of 100 mrem/yr. By comparison, the incremental dose received from living in a brick house versus a wooden house is 10 mrem/yr above background. The cumulative dose to the population within an 80-km (50-mi) radius of the NFSS that would result from radioactive materials present at the site would be indistinguishable from the dose that the same population would receive from naturally occurring radioactive sources. Results of the 1987 monitoring show that the NFSS is in compliance with the DOE radiation protection standard. 13 refs., 10 figs., 20 tabs.

  5. Middlesex Sampling Plant and Middlesex Municipal Landfill, annual site environmental report, Middlesex, New Jersey, calendar year 1987: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1988-04-01

    The monitoring program at the Middlesex Sampling Plant (MSP) and Middlesex Municipal Landfill (MML) measures radon gas concentrations in air; external gamma radiation levels; and uranium and radium concentrations in surface water, groundwater, and sediment. To verify that the sites are in compliance with the DOE radiation protection standard (100 mrem/yr) and to assess their potential effect on public health, the radiation dose was calculated for the maximally exposed individual. Based on the conservative scenarios described in the report, this individual, at the MSP, would receive an annual external exposure approximately equivalent to 10 percent of the DOE radiation protection standard. By comparison, the incremental dose received from living in a brick house as opposed to a wooden house is about the same. At the MML, the annual external exposure to the maximally exposed individual would be less than 1 percent of the standard. The cumulative dose to the population within an 80-km (50-mi) radius of the sites that would result from radioactive materials present at the MSP and MML would be indistinguishable from the dose that the same population would receive from naturally occurring radioactive sources. Results of the 1987 monitoring show that the MSP and MML are in compliance with the DOE radiation protection standard. 14 refs., 11 figs., 22 tabs.

  6. LM 13-14 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    3-14 LM 13-14 NEPA ID: LM 13-14 Determination: B3.2LM 13-14 Short Title: Aerial photography and mapping of the Gunnison, Colorado, Processing Site. LM 13-14 (340.03 KB) More Documents & Publications LM 17-15 LM 06

  7. LM 06-15 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 LM 06-15 NEPA ID: LM 06-15 Short Title: Obtain subsurface soil samples from five locations on the San Juan River floodplain near Shiprock, New Mexico, Disposal Site. Determination: B3.1 LM 06-15 (806.43 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-013456: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 17-15 LM 10-16

  8. LM 15-16 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5-16 LM 15-16 NEPA ID: LM 15-16 Short Title: Conduct Fence Installation and Road Repair at the L-Bar, New Mexico, Disposal Site Determination: B1.3 LM 15-16 (359.33 KB) More Documents & Publications LM 32-15 LM 32-15 CX-010533: Categorical Exclusion Determination

  9. LM 18-15 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    18-15 LM 18-15 NEPA ID: LM 18-15 Short Title: Groundwater Monitoring and Associated Actions at the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site. Determination: B1.24, B1.3 and B3.1 LM 18-15 (269.17 KB) More Documents & Publications LM 18-15 CX-014392: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 07

  10. LM 28-14 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    8-14 LM 28-14 NEPA ID: LM 28-14. Short Title: Aerial Photography and Topographic Mapping of the Weldon Spring, Missouri, Site. Determination: B3.2 LM 28-14 (150.34 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-013312: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 13-14 LM 10-16

  11. Utilizing Isotopic Uranium Ratios in Groundwater Evaluations at FUSRAP Sites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Frederick, W.T.; Keil, K.G.; Rhodes, M.C.; Peterson, J.M.; MacDonell, M.M.

    2007-07-01

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Buffalo District is evaluating environmental radioactive contamination at several Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) sites throughout New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Indiana. The investigations follow the process defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). Groundwater data from the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) in Lewiston, New York were evaluated for isotopic uranium ratios, specifically uranium-234 versus uranium-238 (U- 234 and U-238, respectively), and the results were presented at Waste Management 2006. Since uranium naturally occurs in all groundwater, it can be difficult to distinguish where low-concentration impacts from past releases differ from the high end of a site-specific natural background range. In natural groundwater, the ratio of U-234 to U-238 exceeds 1 (unity) due to the alpha particle recoil effect, in which U-234 is preferentially mobilized to groundwater from adjacent rock or soil. This process is very slow and may take hundreds to thousands of years before a measurable increase is seen in the natural isotopic ratio. If site releases are the source of uranium being measured in groundwater, the U-234 to U-238 ratio is commonly closer to 1, which normally reflects FUSRAP-related, uranium-contaminated wastes and soils. This lower ratio occurs because not enough residence time has elapsed since the 1940's and 1950's for the alpha particle recoil effect to have significantly altered the contamination-derived ratio. An evaluation of NFSS-specific and regional groundwater data indicate that an isotopic ratio of 1.2 has been identified as a signature value to help distinguish natural groundwater, which may have a broad background range, from zones impacted by past releases. (authors)

  12. LM Progressing with Uranium Mines Report to Congress

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    As reported in an earlier Program Update newsletter, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) is compiling data for a Report to Congress on defense-related uranium mines...

  13. About the Financial, Audits, and Contracts Services Team (LM-10.3) |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Financial, Audits, and Contracts Services Team (LM-10.3) About the Financial, Audits, and Contracts Services Team (LM-10.3) The Financial, Audits, and Contracts Services Team provides financial management support within LM in the areas of planning, budget, and financial management; program integration; controls and oversight; internal risk management and mitigation; and acquisition

  14. LM Environmental Policy (PO 436.1a) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Environmental Policy (PO 436.1a) LM Environmental Policy (PO 436.1a) This policy reaffirms the Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Legacy Management's (LM) commitment to protect and respect the environment through our environment, safety, health and quality (ESH&Q) programs. LM Environmental Policy (PO 436.1a) (240.55 KB) More Documents & Publications LM Records and Information Management Transition Guidance (May 2016) EMS Description CX-013661

  15. LM-cert-AFGE1995.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    4 LM 21-14 NEPA ID: LM 21-14 Determinations: B3.1, B6.1, B6.2 Short Title: Onsite and Offsite Bioremediation Injections and Related Activities at the Pinellas County, Florida, Site LM-21-14 (150.79 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-010396: Categorical Exclusion Determination NEPA Determination: LM-13-13 LM 08

    5 LM 21-15 NEPA ID: LM 21-15 Short Title: Lease of the Cabin Portion of Building 12, Grand Junction, Colorado, Site Determination: B1.24 and B1.25 LM 21-15 (151.8 KB) More

  16. LM Annual Post Competition Accountability Reports | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    LM Annual Post Competition Accountability Reports LM Annual Post Competition Accountability Reports Third Annual Post Competition Accountability Report Second Annual Post ...

  17. Crushing leads to waste disposal savings for FUSRAP

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Darby, J.

    1997-02-01

    In this article the author discusses the application of a rock crusher as a means of implementing cost savings in the remediation of FUSRAP sites. Transportation and offsite disposal costs are at present the biggest cost items in the remediation of FUSRAP sites. If these debris disposal problems can be handled in different manners, then remediation savings are available. Crushing can result in the ability to handle some wastes as soil disposal problems, which have different disposal regulations, thereby permitting cost savings.

  18. LM 01-14 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 LM 01-14 NEPA ID: LM 01-14 Determination: B1.36 Short Title: Determination of excess real property LM 01-14 (152.87 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-012200: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 06-15 CX-013996

  19. LM 01-16 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6 LM 01-16 NEPA ID: LM 01-16 Short Title: Evaporation Pond Removal and Verification and Associated Road Maintenance, Durango, Colorado, Disposal Site Determination: B1.3 and B6.1 LM 01-16 (299.04 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-014192: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 16-15 CX-010533

  20. LM 03-16 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6 LM 03-16 NEPA ID: LM 03-16 Short Title: Conduct Pedogenesis Study at the Bluewater, New Mexico, Disposal Site Determination: B3.1 LM 03-16 (356.31 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-012199: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 04-14 CX-014392

  1. LM 05-15 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 LM 05-15 NEPA ID: LM 05-14 Determination: B1.15; B3.1 Short Title: Storm Shelter Installation and Related Activities at the Weldon Spring, Missouri, Site LM 05-14 (150.96 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-012322: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-013312: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 28-14

  2. LM 07-16 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6 LM 07-16 NEPA ID: LM 07-16 Short Title: Conduct Interim Treatment and Environmental Monitoring at the Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site Determinations: B1.26 and B3.1 LM 07-16 (320.66 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-014192: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 16-15 CX-010533: Categorical Exclusion Determination

  3. LM 14-14 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4-14 LM 14-14 NEPA ID: LM 14-14 Determination: B3.1(c) Short Title: Installation and Redevelopment of Groundwater Monitoring Wells at the Salmon, Mississippi, Site LM 14-14 (1.15 MB) More Documents & Publications CX-012726: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 17

  4. Soil Characterization at the Linde FUSRAP Site and the Impact on Soil Volume Estimates

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Boyle, J.; Kenna, T.; Pilon, R.

    2002-02-27

    The former Linde site in Tonawanda, New York is currently undergoing active remediation of Manhattan Engineering District's radiological contamination. This remediation is authorized under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The focus of this paper will be to describe the impact of soil characterization efforts as they relate to soil volume estimates and project cost estimates. An additional objective is to stimulate discussion about other characterization and modeling technologies, and to provide a ''Lessons Learned'' scenario to assist in future volume estimating at other FUSRAP sites. Initial soil characterization efforts at the Linde FUSRAP site in areas known to be contaminated or suspected to be contaminated were presented in the Remedial Investigation Report for the Tonawanda Site, dated February 1993. Results of those initial characterization efforts were the basis for soil volume estimates that were used to estimate and negotiate the current remediation contract. During the course of remediation, previously unidentified areas of contamination were discovered, and additional characterization was initiated. Additional test pit and geoprobe samples were obtained at over 500 locations, bringing the total to over 800 sample locations at the 135-acre site. New data continues to be collected on a routine basis during ongoing remedial actions.

  5. LM 19-16 | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    9-16 LM 19-16 NEPA ID: LM 19-16 Short Title: Renewal of Lease for Westminster, Colorado, Office Space Determination: B1.3 and B1.24 LM 19-16 (515.17 KB) More Documents & Publications LM 18-16 CX-008763: Categorical Exclusion Determination Amendment to LM-07-12 for Fiber Optic Cable Trenching at the Westminster, Colorado, Office

  6. LM 04-14 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 LM 04-14 NEPA ID: LM 04-14 Determination: B3.1 and B6.1 Short Title: Abandon five test holes and remove contaminated soils from the associated well pads at the Chariot, Alaska, Site LM 04-14 (148.88 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-012199: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 22-14 LM 03-16

  7. LM 08-16 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    8-16 LM 08-16 NEPA ID: LM 08-16 Short Title: Well Abandonment and Equipment Transfer at the Pinellas County, Florida, Site Determination: B1.24; B1.30; B1.31; and B3.1 LM 08-16 (279.4 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-010396: Categorical Exclusion Determination NEPA Determination: LM-13-13 LM 21-14

  8. LM 17-15 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7-15 LM 17-15 NEPA ID: LM 17-15 Short Title: Field Studies to include installing groundwater monitoring wells, obtaining groundwater and sediment samples, land surveys, measuring surface water discharge, and conducting miscellaneous field activities near the former Riverton, Wyoming, Processing Site Determination: B3.1 LM 17-15 (1.74 MB) More Documents & Publications CX-013996: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 12-13 LM 14-14

  9. Occurrence of Metastudtite (Uranium Peroxide Dihydrate) at a FUSRAP Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Young, C.M.; Nelson, K.A.; Stevens, G.T.; Grassi, V.J.

    2006-07-01

    Uranium concentrations in groundwater in a localized area of a site exceed the USEPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) by a factor of one thousand. Although the groundwater seepage velocity ranges up to 0.7 meters per day (m/day), data indicate that the uranium is not migrating in groundwater. We believe that the uranium is not mobile because of local geochemical conditions and the unstable nature of the uranium compound present at the site; uranium peroxide dihydrate (metastudtite). Metastudtite [UO{sub 4}.2(H{sub 2}O) or (U(O{sub 2})|O|(OH){sub 2}).3H{sub 2}O] has been identified at other sites as an alteration product in casks of spent nuclear fuel, but neither enriched nor depleted uranium were present at this site. Metastudtite was first identified as a natural mineral in 1983, although documented occurrences in the environment are uncommon. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is conducting a remedial investigation at the DuPont Chambers Works in Deep water New Jersey under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) to evaluate radioactive contamination resulting from historical activities conducted in support of Manhattan Engineering District operations. From 1942 to 1947, Chambers Works converted uranium oxides to uranium tetrafluoride and uranium metal. More than half of the production at this facility resulted from the recovery process, where uranium-bearing dross and scrap were reacted with hydrogen peroxide to produce uranium peroxide dihydrate. The 280-hectare Chambers Works has produced some 600 products, including petrochemicals, aromatics, fluoro-chemicals, polymers, and elastomers. Contaminants resulting from these processes, including separate-phase petrochemicals, have also been detected within the boundaries of the FUSRAP investigation. USACE initiated remedial investigation field activities in 2002. The radionuclides of concern are natural uranium (U{sub nat}) and its short-lived progeny. Areas of impacted soil generally

  10. About the Coordination, Operations, and Guidance Team (LM-10.4) |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Coordination, Operations, and Guidance Team (LM-10.4) About the Coordination, Operations, and Guidance Team (LM-10.4) The Coordination, Operations, and Guidance Team is responsible for new administrative initiatives, programs, and activities affecting LM policies and programs. The team designs, executes, and reports on analyses of sensitive and critical management systems and operations. The team is responsible for oversight, coordination, and ensuring an integrated

  11. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand Junction (See LM APS)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Office of Legacy Management (LM), Grand Junction (See LM APS).

  12. Supplement No. 1 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Designation/Elimination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Protocol | Department of Energy 1 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Designation/Elimination Protocol Supplement No. 1 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Designation/Elimination Protocol Supplement No. 1 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Designation/Elimination Protocol (January 1986) Supplement No. 1 to the FUSRAP Summary Protocol - Designation/Elimination Protocol (January 1986) (747.7 KB) More Documents & Publications Summary Protocol: Identification, Characterization, Designation,

  13. LM Releases Update of Site Management Guide

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A new edition of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Site Management Guide (SMG) was posted to the LM website, February 24, 2015.

  14. LM 03-15 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 LM 03-15 NEPA ID: LM 03-15 Short Title: Maintenance and Related Activities at the Burris Park, California, Site, LM 03-15 Determination: B1.3, B1.11, B1.24, B3.1, B6.1 LM 03-15 (154.21 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-013457: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-010533: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-013996

  15. LM 07-14 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 LM 07-14 NEPA ID: LM 07-14 Determination: B3.1, B6.1 and B6.2 Short Title: Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Pilot Study and Potential Full-Scale Sub-Slab Depressurization System Design/Build for Building 100 at the Pinellas County, Florida, Site in Largo, Florida. LM 07-14 (1.03 MB) More Documents & Publications CX-012400: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 21-14 CX-010396: Categorical Exclusion Determination

  16. LM 06-14 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 LM 06-14 NEPA ID: LM 06-14 Determination: B3.1 (c) Short Title: Install three groundwater monitoring wells at the Shoal, Nevada, site. LM 06-14 (150.4 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-010533: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-013996: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-012199: Categorical Exclusion Determination

  17. LM 10-16 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    0-16 LM 10-16 NEPA ID: LM 10-16 Short Title: Unmanned Aerial Systems Operations at the Shiprock, New Mexico, Disposal Site Determination: B1.3 and B3.2 LM 10-16 (320.67 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-013312: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-013695: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-014551: Categorical Exclusion Determination

  18. LM 21-15 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    LM 21-15 NEPA ID: LM 21-15 Short Title: Lease of the Cabin Portion of Building 12, Grand Junction, Colorado, Site Determination: B1.24 and B1.25 LM 21-15 (151.8 KB) More Documents ...

  19. LM 07-15 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 LM 07-15 NEPA ID: LM 07-15 Short Title: Operations, Maintenance, Repairs, Modifications, and Ongoing CERCLA Remedy-Related Actions and Site Facility Support Activities for the Monticello, Utah, Sites Determination: B1.3; B1.11; B1.24; B1.26; B1.33; B2.5; B3.1; B6.1 LM 07-15 (881.05 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-013668: Categorical Exclusion Determination LM 06-15 LM 13-14

  20. Managing Legacy Records for Formerly Utilized Sites. Remedial Action Program Sites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clayton, C.; Gueretta, J.; Tack, J.; Widdop, M.

    2008-07-01

    The Manhattan Engineer District (MED) and U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) contracted for support work through private and academic parties through the early 1960's. The work often involved radioactive materials. Residual radioactive contamination was left at some of more than 600 potentially contaminated (candidate) sites, and worker health and safety concerns remain from the site operations and subsequent remediation activities. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiated a program to identify and protect records of MED/AEC activities and of remediation work conducted under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) to aid in resolving questions about site conditions, liability, and worker health and safety and to ensure ongoing protectiveness of human health and the environment. This paper discusses DOE activities undertaken to locate records collections, confirm retention schedules and access requirements, and document information about the collections for use by future stewards. In conclusion: DOE-LM recognizes that records and information management is a critical component of effective LTS and M. Records are needed to answer questions about site conditions and demonstrate to the public in the future that the sites are safe. DOE-LM is working to satisfy present needs and anticipate future uses for FUSRAP records, and compile a collection of site and program information from which future stewards can readily locate and retrieve needed information. (authors)

  1. Reducing Contingency through Sampling at the Luckey FUSRAP Site - 13186

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Frothingham, David; Barker, Michelle; Buechi, Steve; Durham, Lisa

    2013-07-01

    Typically, the greatest risk in developing accurate cost estimates for the remediation of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive waste sites is the uncertainty in the estimated volume of contaminated media requiring remediation. Efforts to address this risk in the remediation cost estimate can result in large cost contingencies that are often considered unacceptable when budgeting for site cleanups. Such was the case for the Luckey Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) site near Luckey, Ohio, which had significant uncertainty surrounding the estimated volume of site soils contaminated with radium, uranium, thorium, beryllium, and lead. Funding provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) allowed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to conduct additional environmental sampling and analysis at the Luckey Site between November 2009 and April 2010, with the objective to further delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of contaminated soils in order to reduce the uncertainty in the soil volume estimate. Investigative work included radiological, geophysical, and topographic field surveys, subsurface borings, and soil sampling. Results from the investigative sampling were used in conjunction with Argonne National Laboratory's Bayesian Approaches for Adaptive Spatial Sampling (BAASS) software to update the contaminated soil volume estimate for the site. This updated volume estimate was then used to update the project cost-to-complete estimate using the USACE Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis process, which develops cost contingencies based on project risks. An investment of $1.1 M of ARRA funds for additional investigative work resulted in a reduction of 135,000 in-situ cubic meters (177,000 in-situ cubic yards) in the estimated base volume estimate. This refinement of the estimated soil volume resulted in a $64.3 M reduction in the estimated project cost-to-complete, through a reduction in the uncertainty in the contaminated soil

  2. LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2016 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2016 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2016 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2016 (198.55 KB) More Documents & Publications LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2015

  3. 2016-2025 LM Strategic Plan

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 STRATEGIC PLAN DOE/LM-1477 http://energy.gov/lm Managing Today's Change, Protecting Tomorrow's Future This document was printed on paper manufactured with post-consumer waste as part of LM's commitment to environmental responsibility. Using recycled paper conserves resources, saves energy, and reduces pollution. Clockwise from top left: Rocky Flats, Colorado, Site. Fernald Preserve Visitors Center in Ohio. Mexican Hat, Utah, Disposal Site. BONUS, Puerto Rico, Decommissioned Reactor, Site.

  4. LM 22-14 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2-14 LM 22-14 NEPA ID: LM 22-14 Determination: B3.1 Short Title: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center-Science Focus Area (SLAC-SFA) Geoprobe Sampling Near the Naturita, Colorado, Title I Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Processing Site LM 22-14 (150.67 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-013456: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-013996: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-008761: Categorical Exclusion Determination

  5. Innovative Regulatory and Technical Approaches for the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers' Linde FUSRAP Site Remediation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Pitts, J. T.; Coutts, P. W.; Franz, J.; Boyle, J. D.; Rogers, B. C.

    2002-02-27

    The U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) created the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to identify, investigate, and cleanup or control radiological contamination at sites used by the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) from the 1940s through the 1960s. The USDOE had identified 46 sites in the program and finished remediation at 24 of the smaller ones before the end of 1997. With the passage of the Energy and Water Resources Appropriation Act of 1998 the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) was designated by Congress with responsibility to manage and execute the FUSRAP. The Linde Site located in Tonawanda, New York was operated by the MED from 1942-1946 to extract uranium from several high-grade ores. This natural uranium was subsequently enriched in U-235 elsewhere in the United States and ultimately used to produce energy or weapons. Though in the process of reviewing alternative disposal options by 1995, the USDOE had operated FUSRAP with a strategy requiring virtually all materials remediated be disposed of at only one Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensed facility. The change in management of the FUSRAP in 1997 allowed the disposal policy of low levels of radioactively contaminated materials found at the remaining sites to be reexamined. This paper presents some of the innovative regulatory and technical approaches employed at the Linde Site that are resulting in project cost savings while meeting applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements as well as fulfilling commitments made to the local community.

  6. LM Receives Sustainability Award | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Receives Sustainability Award LM Receives Sustainability Award January 8, 2013 - 1:17pm Addthis Award ceremony (left to right): Melvin G. Williams, Jr., Associate Deputy Secretary, ...

  7. NEPA Determination: LM-12a-12

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Additional Considerations Amendment to LM #12-12, Routine and Non-Routine Activities at the Grand Junction, Colorado, Office Site 

  8. Study of field assessment methods and worker risks for processing alternatives to support principles for FUSRAP waste materials. Part 1: Treatment methods and comparative risks of thorium removal from waste residues

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Porter, R.D.; Hamby, D.M.; Martin, J.E.

    1997-07-01

    This study was done to examine the risks of remediation and the effectiveness of removal methods for thorium and its associated radioactive decay products from various soils and wastes associated with DOE`s Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Its purpose was to provide information to the Environmental Management Advisory Board`s FUSRAP Committee for use in its deliberation of guiding principles for FUSRAP sites, in particular the degree to which treatment should be considered in the FUSRAP Committee`s recommendations. Treatment of FUSRAP wastes to remove thorium could be beneficial to management of lands that contain thorium if such treatment were effective and cost efficient. It must be recognized, however, that treatment methods invariably require workers to process residues and waste materials usually with bulk handling techniques. These processes expose workers to the radioactivity in the materials, therefore, workers would incur radiological risks in addition to industrial accident risks. An important question is whether the potential reduction of future radiological risks to members of the public justifies the risks that are incurred by remediation workers due to handling materials. This study examines, first, the effectiveness of treatment and then the risks that would be associated with remediation. Both types of information should be useful for decisions on whether and how to apply thorium removal methods to FUSRAP waste materials.

  9. Uptake by plants of radionuclides from FUSRAP waste materials

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Knight, M.J.

    1983-04-01

    Radionuclides from FUSRAP wastes potentially may be taken up by plants during remedial action activities and permanent near-surface burial of contaminated materials. In order to better understand the propensity of radionuclides to accumulate in plant tissue, soil and plant factors influencing the uptake and accumulation of radionuclides by plants are reviewed. In addition, data describing the uptake of the principal radionuclides present in FUSRAP wastes (uranium-238, thorium-230, radium-226, lead-210, and polonium-210) are summarized. All five radionuclides can accumulate in plant root tissue to some extent, and there is potential for the translocation and accumulation of these radionuclides in plant shoot tissue. Of these five radionuclides, radium-226 appears to have the greatest potential for translocation and accumulation in plant shoot tissue. 28 references, 1 figure, 3 tables.

  10. Text-Alternative Version: Walking Through Examples of Real LM-79 & LM-80 Reports

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Below is the text-alternative version of Day 3 of the three-part TINSSL Webinar Series "Understanding and Evaluating LM-79 & LM-80 Reports for SSL Technology," held August 12, 2010.

  11. Long Term Stewardship Challenges at the St. Louis District FUSRAP Sites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dell'Orco, L.; Chambers, D.

    2002-02-27

    Non-Federally owned radioactively contaminated sites in St. Louis, Missouri are currently being remediated by the St. Louis District Corps of Engineers under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). When FUSRAP remediation is complete, inaccessible soils which have levels of contamination greater than unrestricted use standards, will remain. The purpose of this paper is to document the initial challenges facing the project team during its development of the Long Term Stewardship plan for the management of these soils. These soils are located under buildings, roads, railroads and bridges. The Long Term Stewardship plan for the majority of the sites is being developed simultaneously with the remedy selection process. A living document, it will ultimately document the remedial action end state and location of inaccessible soils and implement the plan for ensuring these soils are not a threat to human health and the environment. Although these soils are protective in their current configuration, at some point in time, when activities such as maintenance, utility or property improvement occur, the soils will become accessible and need to be addressed by the federal government. Up until that point in time they will need to be effectively managed to ensure they remain protective. The St. Louis District is in the process of collaboratively developing this plan with its regulators, affected stakeholders and interested parties.

  12. FRIctl: EUBJEZT: FUSRAP Considered Site Recommendation STATE: B

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    FRIctl: EUBJEZT: FUSRAP Considered Site Recommendation STATE: B l ---m-m- Owe,- contacted i \ TYPE OF OPERATION --------------__ * Research & Oevel opmeot + Facility fypm $. Prcducticn scale tasting G Pilct Ecale g Uanufncturinq E Bench 0 University Sca1 e Prccess a Thecretical Studies a Research Crganizaticn il 0 Governmdnt Sponscrrd Faci 1 i ty Sample b Analysis a ather _-b-_----- 0 Prcductien E Disposal /Storage TYP= C' F CCNTRACT ---=--0--------- n Prime Subc=ntract&r G a Purchase

  13. Microsoft Word - FUSRAP Middlesex NJ.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    These ores, imported for use in the nation's early atomic energy program, were assayed at ... mile away. In 1980's, the contaminated residential properties were cleaned up, and the ...

  14. LM-04-XXXX Office of Legacy Management

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    LM-04-XXXX Office of Legacy Management Information and Records Management Transition Guidance March 2004 LM Information and Records Management Transition Guidance March 2004 Contents Page ii Table of Contents Page Executive Summary................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................... 1 2.0 The Life Cycle

  15. 100 LPW 800 Lm Warm White LED

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sun, Decai

    2010-10-31

    An illumination grade warm white (WW) LED, having correlated color temperature (CCT) between 2800 K and 3500K and capable of producing 800 lm output at 100 lm/W, has been developed in this program. The high power WW LED is an ideal source for use as replacement for incandescent, and Halogen reflector and general purpose lamps of similar lumen value. Over the two year period, we have made following accomplishments: developed a high power warm white LED product and made over 50% improvements in light output and efficacy. The new high power WW LED product is a die on ceramic surface mountable LED package. It has four 1x1 mm{sup 2} InGaN pump dice flip chip attached to a ceramic submount in 2x2 array, covered by warm white phosphor ceramic platelets called Lumiramica and an overmolded silicone lens encapsulating the LED array. The performance goal was achieved through breakthroughs in following key areas: (1) High efficiency pump LED development through pump LED active region design and epi growth quality improvement (funded by internal programs). (2) Increase in injection efficiency (IE) represented by reduction in forward voltage (V{sub f}) through the improvement of the silver-based p-contact and a reduction in spreading resistance. The injection efficiency was increased from 80% at the start of the program to 96% at the end of the program at 700 mA/mm{sup 2}. (3) Improvement in thermal design as represented by reduction in thermal resistance from junction to case, through improvement of the die to submount connection in the thin film flip chip (TFFC) LED and choosing the submount material of high thermal conductivity. A thermal resistance of 1.72 K/W was demonstrated for the high power LED package. (4) Improvement in extraction efficiency from the LED package through improvement of InGaN die level and package level optical extraction efficiency improvement. (5) Improvement in phosphor system efficiency by improving the lumen equivalent (LE) and phosphor package

  16. LM Director Retires/New Acting LM Director Appointed | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    in several capacities, including international programs, high-level waste research and development, complex-wide planning and integration, deployment of new technology ...

  17. DRAFT LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    DRAFT LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan DRAFT LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan File Draft LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan More Documents & Publications 2011-2020 Strategic Plan The First Decade, ...

  18. 9/03/1998 08: 31 4234814757 SAIC _ FUSRAP

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    9/03/1998 08: 31 4234814757 SAIC _ FUSRAP ti y. is%-! PAGE 05 Authorization for Remedial Actioll at the Scaway.Industrlrl I. -Col',(I):Sjtts at Tonawanda, KY, and Mallbtckrodt Chemical Park and Ashland 0 . I ,:. ,..( ).._. - ,' . . : f , '.j'; IJ~~;'ia#.3~ ;;;k6';&& : : ~ ; ,Oak Ridge 8ptrrtlons'Off1ct ', . .i:. .' ,.: . : .- :/ :., +,havc'dttt*intd ' that tht subject radioactive material as a result EnergjXZniss~on operations at 1:hose sites. ins contamination is In: .:: I, k!xcess.of

  19. 2015 LM Significant Environmental Aspects | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Significant Environmental Aspects More Documents & Publications LM Significant Environmental Aspects Significant Environmental Aspects 2014 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM)...

  20. New Eligibility Guidelines Lead to Increase in LM's EEOICPA Requests...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    The statistics are then compiled into reports that keep LM management informed of response progress. Addthis Related Articles LM Business Center Hosts Office of Environment, ...

  1. LM to Meet Energy Metering Goals Through Enhanced Data Collection...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    LM responsibility-such as the Rocky Flats, Colorado, Site and Fernald Preserve in Harrison, Ohio-had multiple buildings, which accounted for LM maintaining a large building...

  2. Analysis of LM Stakeholder Interaction and External Communications...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    interaction is performed yearly by LM. The tools used for this evaluation include statistical software to track Internet usage, the LM National Stakeholder Database, an overview ...

  3. UC-70A Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The 1984 survey revealed site field areas with above-guideline concentrations of thorium-2... based on current cleanup guidelines for thorium-232 and radium-226, approximately 2000 m3 ...

  4. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... (TA-10) was utilized by MED and later the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) between 1944 and ... The survey comprised collection of soil samples and near-surface gamma-ray measurements. ...

  5. IESNA LM-80-08 - An Overview of the Test Procedure and How it is Used for

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ENERGY STAR® | Department of Energy IESNA LM-80-08 - An Overview of the Test Procedure and How it is Used for ENERGY STAR® IESNA LM-80-08 - An Overview of the Test Procedure and How it is Used for ENERGY STAR® This October 30, 2008 webcast provided an overview of LM-80-08, Approved Method for Measuring Lumen Maintenance of LED Light Sources, and how DOE's ENERGY STAR program for Solid-State Lighting (SSL) Luminaires will use LM-80 to estimate lifetime for qualified SSL Luminaires. Richard

  6. LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2014 (15.38 KB) More Documents & Publications 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of Fossil Energy 2011 ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH AND PROJECTS AGENCY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2015

  7. 130 LPW 1000 Lm Warm White LED for Illumination

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Soer, Wouter

    2012-06-14

    An illumination-grade warm-white LED, having correlated color temperature (CCT) between 2700 and 3500 K and capable of producing 1000 lm output at over 130 lm/W at room temperature, has been developed in this program. The high-power warm-white LED is an ideal source for use in indoor and outdoor lighting applications. Over the two year period, we have made the following accomplishments: • Developed a low-cost high-power white LED package and commercialized a series of products with CCT ranging from 2700 to 5700 K under the product name LUXEON M; • Demonstrated a record efficacy of 124.8 lm/W at a flux of 1023 lm, CCT of 3435 K and color rendering index (CRI) over 80 at room temperature in the productized package; • Demonstrated a record efficacy of 133.1 lm/W at a flux of 1015 lm, CCT of 3475 K and CRI over 80 at room temperature in an R&D package. The new high-power LED package is a die-on-ceramic surface mountable LED package. It has four 2 mm2 InGaN pump dice, flip-chip attached to a ceramic submount in a 2x2 array configuration. The submount design utilizes a design approach that combines a high-thermal- conductivity ceramic core for die attach and a low-cost and low-thermal-conductivity ceramic frame for mechanical support and as optical lens carrier. The LED package has a thermal resistance of less than 1.25 K/W. The white LED fabrication also adopts a new batch level (instead of die-by-die) phosphor deposition process with precision layer thickness and composition control, which provides not only tight color control, but also low cost. The efficacy performance goal was achieved through the progress in following key areas: (1) high-efficiency royal blue pump LED development through active region design and epitaxial growth quality improvement (funded by internal programs); (2) improvement in extraction efficiency from the LED package through improvement of InGaN-die-level and package-level optical extraction efficiency; and (3) improvement in phosphor

  8. Hydrogeologic Modeling at the Sylvania Corning FUSRAP Site - 13419

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ewy, Ann; Heim, Kenneth J.; McGonigal, Sean T.; Talimcioglu, Nazmi M.

    2013-07-01

    A comparative groundwater hydrogeologic modeling analysis is presented herein to simulate potential contaminant migration pathways in a sole source aquifer in Nassau County, Long Island, New York. The source of contamination is related to historical operations at the Sylvania Corning Plant ('Site'), a 9.49- acre facility located at 70, 100 and 140 Cantiague Rock Road, Town of Oyster Bay in the westernmost portion of Hicksville, Long Island. The Site had historically been utilized as a nuclear materials manufacturing facility (e.g., cores, slug, and fuel elements) for reactors used in both research and electric power generation in early 1950's until late 1960's. The Site is contaminated with various volatile organic and inorganic compounds, as well as radionuclides. The major contaminants of concern at the Site are tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), nickel, uranium, and thorium. These compounds are present in soil and groundwater underlying the Site and have migrated off-site. The Site is currently being investigated as part of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The main objective of the current study is to simulate the complex hydrogeologic features in the region, such as numerous current and historic production well fields; large, localized recharge basins; and, multiple aquifers, and to assess potential contaminant migration pathways originating from the Site. For this purpose, the focus of attention was given to the underlying Magothy formation, which has been impacted by the contaminants of concern. This aquifer provides more than 90% of potable water supply in the region. Nassau and Suffolk Counties jointly developed a three-dimensional regional groundwater flow model to help understand the factors affecting groundwater flow regime in the region, to determine adequate water supply for public consumption, to investigate salt water intrusion in localized areas, to evaluate the impacts of regional pumping activity, and to

  9. Text-Alternative Version: Understanding and Evaluating LM-79 Reports

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Below is the text-alternative version of Day 1 of the three-part TINSSL Webinar Series "Understanding and Evaluating LM-79 & LM-80 Reports for SSL Technology," held August 10, 2010.

  10. 2014 LM All-Hands Training | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    ultimately led to LM's modern-day mission. On Wednesday, the group traveled to the Grants Mining District to see LM's Bluewater Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA)...

  11. DRAFT LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    and the environment. Comments can be emailed to LM@hq.doe.gov, or mailed to Mr. Tony Carter, LM-1, 1000 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20585. The comment period will close...

  12. Moab UMTRA Project/LM Technical Exchange | Department of Energy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Office of Legacy Management (LM) technical exchange was hosted at the LM office in Grand Junction, Colorado, on March 2, 2016. The primary goal of the technical exchange was to ...

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Sohio Lbar Site - 022

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sohio Lbar Site - 022 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Sohio Lbar Site (022 ) Remediated; managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/lbar/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: L-Bar, NM, Disposal Site Location: Cibola County, New Mexico Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Uranium mill tailings disposal Site Disposition: Remediated by DOE and managed by DOE LM Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  14. LM Conducts Groundwater and Soil Investigation at Riverton, Wyoming, in

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Response to 2010 Flood | Department of Energy Conducts Groundwater and Soil Investigation at Riverton, Wyoming, in Response to 2010 Flood LM Conducts Groundwater and Soil Investigation at Riverton, Wyoming, in Response to 2010 Flood October 16, 2012 - 10:50am Addthis LM Conducts Groundwater and Soil Investigation at Riverton, Wyoming, in Response to 2010 Flood LM Conducts Groundwater and Soil Investigation at Riverton, Wyoming, in Response to 2010 Flood LM Conducts Groundwater and Soil

  15. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Legacy Management (LM)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within Legacy Management (LM).

  16. LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Electronic Records Keeping System,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Office of Legacy Management, | Department of Energy System (LMRHS01) - Electronic Records Keeping System, Office of Legacy Management, LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Electronic Records Keeping System, Office of Legacy Management, LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Electronic Records Keeping System, Office of Legacy Management, LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Electronic Records Keeping System, Office of Legacy Management, (472.43 KB) More Documents & Publications LM

  17. Successful Implementation of Soil Segregation Technology at the Painesville FUSRAP Site - 12281

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Buechi, Stephen P.; Andrews, Shawn M.; Lombardo, Andrew J.; Lively, Jeffrey W.

    2012-07-01

    Typically the highest cost component of the radiological soils remediation of Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) sites is the cost to transport and dispose of the excavated soils, typically contaminated with naturally occurring isotopes of uranium, thorium and radium, at an appropriately permitted off-site disposal facility. The heterogeneous nature of the contamination encountered at these sites makes it difficult to accurately delineate the extent of contaminated soil using the limited, discrete sampling data collected during the investigation phases; and difficult to precisely excavate only the contaminated soil that is above the established cleanup limits using standard in-field scanning and guiding methodologies. This usually results in a conservative guided excavation to ensure cleanup criteria are met, with the attendant transportation and disposal costs for the larger volumes of soil excavated. To address this issue during the remediation of the Painesville FUSRAP Site, located in Painesville, Ohio, the Buffalo District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and its contractor, Safety and Ecology Corporation (SEC), employed automatic soil segregation technology provided by MACTEC (now AMEC) to reduce the potential for transportation and disposal of soils that met the cleanup limits. This waste minimization technology utilized gamma spectroscopy of conveyor-fed soils to automatically segregate the material into above and below criteria discharge piles. Use of the soil segregation system resulted in cost savings through the significant reduction of the volume of excavated soil that required off-site transportation and disposal, and the reduction of the amount of imported clean backfill required via reuse of 'below criteria' segregated soil as place back material in restoring the excavations. Measurements taken by the soil segregation system, as well as results of quality control sampling of segregated soils, confirmed that soils segregated

  18. 2016 LM Significant Environmental Aspects | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    LM Significant Environmental Aspects 2016 LM Significant Environmental Aspects 2016 LM Significant Environmental Aspects (33.66 KB) More Documents & Publications DOE-HDBK-1139/2-02 DOE-HDBK-1139-2006 EIS-0375: EPA Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Impact Statement

  19. Middlesex FUSRAP Site - A Path to Site-Wide Closure - 13416

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Miller, David M.; Edge, Helen

    2013-07-01

    The road-map to obtaining closure of the Middlesex Sampling Plant FUSRAP site in Middlesex, New Jersey (NJ) has required a multi-faceted approach, following the CERCLA Process. Since 1998, the US ACE, ECC, and other contractors have completed much of the work required for regulatory acceptance of site closure with unrestricted use. To date, three buildings have been decontaminated, demolished, and disposed of. Two interim storage piles have been removed and disposed of, followed by the additional removal and disposal of over 87,000 tons of radiologically and chemically-impacted subsurface soils by the summer of 2008. The US ACE received a determination from the EPA for the soils Operable Unit, (OU)-1, in September 2010 that the remedial excavations were acceptable, and meet the criteria for unrestricted use as required by the 2004 Record of Decision (ROD) for OU-1. Following the completion of OU-1, the project delivery team performed additional field investigation of the final Operable Unit for Middlesex, OU-2, Groundwater. As of December 2012, the project delivery team has completed a Supplemental Remedial Investigation, which will be followed with a streamlined Feasibility Study, Proposed Plan, and ROD. Several years of historical groundwater data was available from previous investigations and the FUSRAP Environmental Surveillance Program. Historical data indicated sporadic detections of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), primarily trichloroethylene (TCE), carbon tetrachloride (CT), and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), with no apparent trend or pattern indicating extent or source of the VOC impact. In 2008, the project delivery team initiated efforts to re-assess the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for groundwater. The bedrock was re-evaluated as a leaky multi-unit aquifer, and a plan was developed for additional investigations for adequate bedrock characterization and delineation of groundwater contaminated primarily by CT, TCE, and tetrachloroethene (PCE). The

  20. Radioactive and Chemical Waste Characterization, Segregation, and Remedial Action at the Fusrap Middlesex Sampling Plant Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Wankum, R.D.; Kenney, J.; Mizrahi, M.; O'Dwyer, P.; Miller, D.M.

    2007-07-01

    The challenge of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) designated Middlesex Sampling Plant (MSP) site is to economically meet the clean up criteria for both radiological and chemical hazards present. The goal is to ensure the site is remediated in accordance with the Record of Decision (ROD), while at the same time minimizing waste generation and maintaining the lowest disposal costs possible. This paper describes the results achieved to date during remediation activities. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) contracted ECC as the prime contractor to perform the remediation. The project is being performed under a Performance Based task order utilizing design-build processes. ECC has utilized multiple screening processes to first segregate and minimize the amount of material that needs to be handled as radioactive material, and secondly to segregate and minimize the amount of material that needs to be handled as hazardous. This process is allowing ECC to meet the cleanup criteria while minimizing cost. (authors)

  1. Abandoned Uranium Mines Report to Congress: LM Wants Your Input |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Abandoned Uranium Mines Report to Congress: LM Wants Your Input Abandoned Uranium Mines Report to Congress: LM Wants Your Input April 11, 2013 - 1:33pm Addthis C-SR-10 Uintah Mine, Colorado, LM Uranium Lease Tracts C-SR-10 Uintah Mine, Colorado, LM Uranium Lease Tracts What does this project do? Goal 4. Optimize the use of land and assets Abandoned Uranium Mines Report to Congress The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) is seeking stakeholder

  2. LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan Released | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2016-2025 Strategic Plan Released LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan Released July 21, 2016 - 4:48pm Addthis What does this project do? Goal 6: Engage the public, governments, and interested parties The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management (LM) is pleased to announce its newly released LM 2016-2025 Strategic Plan. This is the fourth strategic plan since LM's inception in December 2003. Through the organization's continued growth and learning, LM has adopted more effective and efficient

  3. Program Analysis | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Responsibilities (Waste Management Conference 2006) Process for Transition of Responsibilities (323.56 KB) More Documents & Publications FUSRAP Overview Managing Legacy Records for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Sites Assessing and Implementing LTS&M Requirements for Remediation Sites Under the FUSRAP Program II Disposal Sites to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management for Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance | Department of Energy

    Uranium Mill

  4. About the Environment Team 1 (LM-20.1) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Environment Team 1 (LM-20.1) About the Environment Team 1 (LM-20.1) Text coming

  5. LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Rocky Flats Environmental Records

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Database, Office of Legacy Management | Department of Energy Rocky Flats Environmental Records Database, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Rocky Flats Environmental Records Database, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Rocky Flats Environmental Records Database, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Rocky Flats Environmental Records Database, Office of Legacy Management (470.9 KB) More Documents

  6. Program Update

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    April-June 2014 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Offce of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update. This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to lm@hq.doe.gov. April-June 2014 Visit us at http://energy.gov/lm/ Goal 4 Optimizing the Use of Federal Lands Through Disposition The foundation of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Offce of Legacy Manage- ment's (LM) Goal 4, "Optimize the use of land and

  7. LM Records and Information Management Transition Guidance (January...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2015) More Documents & Publications Information and Records Management Transition Guidance LM Environmental Policy (PO 436.1a) Site Transition Process Upon Cleanup Completion

  8. LM Glasfiber India Pvt Ltd | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    to: navigation, search Name: LM Glasfiber (India) Pvt. Ltd. Place: Bangalore, Karnataka, India Zip: 562114 Sector: Wind energy Product: Bangalore-based manufacturer and supplier...

  9. LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Rocky Flats Environmental...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Rocky Flats Environmental Records Database, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Rocky Flats Environmental Records Database, Office of Legacy ...

  10. Mark Your Calendars! 2015 DOE LM Independent Stakeholder Satisfaction...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    stakeholders and regulators to gather input on the effectiveness of DOE LM community communication strategies. www.lmsurveyaddress.com Survey ad for Quarterly Newsletter...

  11. World Record White OLED Performance Exceeds 100 lm/W

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Universal Display Corporation (UDC) has successfully demonstrated a record-breaking white organic light-emitting diode (WOLED) with a power efficacy of 102 lm/W at 1000 cd/m2 using its proprietary, high-efficiency phosphorescent OLED technology. This achievement represents a significant milestone for OLED technology, demonstrating performance that surpasses the power efficacy of incandescent bulbs with less than 15 lm/W and fluorescent lamps at 60-90 lm/W. Funded in part by DOE, UDC's achievement is a major step toward DOE's roadmap goal of a 150 lm/W commercial OLED light source by 2015.

  12. 2014 LM All-Hands Training | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2014 LM All-Hands Training 2014 LM All-Hands Training October 15, 2014 - 11:41am Addthis What does this project do? Goal 5. Sustain management excellence. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) 2014 All-Hands Training was held the week of July 28, 2014, in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The week included presentations from LM staff and managers, a trip to the National Museum of Nuclear Science & History, teamwork and personal development training, as well as site

  13. LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2015 | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    LM Annual NEPA Planning Summary 2015 More Documents & Publications 2015 Annual NEPA Planning Summaries Annual NEPA Planning Summary Report Template 2013 Annual Planning Summary for...

  14. Analysis of LM Stakeholder Interaction and External Communications...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) makes every effort to communicate with its stakeholders through public and small group meetings, conferences,...

  15. 2014 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2014 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2014 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2014 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) (171.31 KB) More Documents & Publications 2012 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2011 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2015 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM

  16. 2015 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2015 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2015 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2015 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) (225.45 KB) More Documents & Publications 2014 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2011 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2012 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM)

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Bodo Canyon Cell - 006

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Bodo Canyon Cell - 006 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Bodo Canyon Cell (006) Remediated; managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/durango/ Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Durango, CO, Disposal Site Location: Durango, Colorado Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Uranium mill tailings disposal Site Disposition: Remediated under UMTRCA Title I Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Burro Canyon Disposal Cell - 007

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Burro Canyon Disposal Cell - 007 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Burro Canyon Disposal Cell (007) Remediated; managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/Slick_Rock/Processing/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Slick Rock, CO, Disposal Site Location: San Miguel County, Colorado Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Uranium mill tailings disposal Site Disposition: Remediated under UMTRCA Title I

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Cheney Disposal Cell - 008

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Cheney Disposal Cell - 008 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Cheney Disposal Cell (008) Remediated; managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/Grand_Junction_DP/Disposal/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Grand Junction, CO, Disposal Site Location: Mesa County, Colorado Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Uranium mill tailings disposal Site Disposition: Remediated under UMTRCA Title I Radioactive

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Clive Disposal Cell - 036

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Clive Disposal Cell - 036 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Clive Disposal Cell (036 ) Remediated; managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/Salt_Lake/Disposal/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Salt Lake City, UT, Disposal Site Location: Salt Lake City, Utah Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Uranium mill tailings disposal Site Disposition: Remediated under UMTRCA Title I Radioactive Materials

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Estes Gulch Disposal Cell - 010

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Estes Gulch Disposal Cell - 010 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Estes Gulch Disposal Cell (010) Remediated; managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/Rifle/Disposal/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Rifle, CO, Disposal Site Location: Rifle, Colorado Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Uranium mill tailings disposal Site Disposition: Remediated under UMTRCA Title I Radioactive Materials Handled:

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Fernald Environmental Management

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Project - 027 Fernald Environmental Management Project - 027 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Fernald Environmental Management Project // Feed Materials Production Center (OH.12) (027) Remediated; managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/fernald/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Fernald, OH, Site; Fernald Preserve Location: Hamilton, Ohio Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Uranium processing

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Geothermal Test Facility - 001

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Geothermal Test Facility - 001 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Geothermal Test Facility (001) Remediated; records are managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/geothermal/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Geothermal Test Facility, CA, Site Location: Imperial County, California Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Geothermal testing projects Site Disposition: Remediated by DOE Office of

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Inhalation Toxicology Research

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Institute - 020 Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute - 020 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute (020) Remediated; records are managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/ITL/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory, NM, Site; ITL Site Location: Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations:

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Oxnard Facility - 002

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Oxnard Facility - 002 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Oxnard Facility (002) Remediated; records are managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/oxnard/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Oxnard, CA, Site; High-Energy Rate Forging (HERF) Facility Location: Oxnard, California Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Metal work Site Disposition: Remediated by DOE Office of Environmental Management in 1996

  6. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- WNI Sherwood Site - 039

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sherwood Site - 039 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: WNI Sherwood Site (039) Remediated; managed by DOE LM. More information at http://www.lm.doe.gov/sherwood/Sites.aspx Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Sherwood, WA, Disposal Site Location: Stevens County, Washington Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Uranium mill tailings disposal cell Site Disposition: Remediated under UMTRCA Title II Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes

  7. 2013 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2013 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) 2013 Facility EMS Annual Report Data (DOE-LM) PDF icon 2013 Facility EMS Annual Report Data...

  8. Scoping survey of perceived concerns, issues, and problems for near-surface disposal of FUSRAP waste

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Robinson, J.E.; Gilbert, T.L.

    1982-12-01

    This report is a scoping summary of concerns, issues, and perceived problems for near-surface disposal of radioactive waste, based on a survey of the current literature. Near-surface disposal means land burial in or within 15 to 20 m of the earth's surface. It includes shallow land burial (burial in trenches, typically about 6 m deep with a 2-m cap and cover) and some intermediate-depth land burial (e.g., trenches and cap similar to shallow land burial, but placed below 10 to 15 m of clean soil). Proposed solutions to anticipated problems also are discussed. The purpose of the report is to provide a better basis for identifying and evaluating the environmental impacts and related factors that must be analyzed and compared in assessing candidate near-surface disposal sites for FUSRAP waste. FUSRAP wastes are of diverse types, and their classification for regulatory purposes is not yet fixed. Most of it may be characterized as low-activity bulk solid waste, and is similar to mill tailings, but with somewhat lower average specific activity. It may also qualify as Class A segregated waste under the proposed 10 CFR 61 rules, but the parent radionuclides of concern in FUSRAP (primarily U-238 and Th-232) have longer half-lives than do the radionuclides of concern in most low-level waste. Most of the references reviewed deal with low-level waste or mill tailings, since there is as yet very little literature in the public domain on FUSRAP per se.

  9. Microsoft Word - DOE_LM_HPOFINAL6.19.12.docx

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Page 1 of 9 Reporting Period: Fiscal Years (FY) 2012 - 2016 FY2012 Annual Report Management Excellence Goals Driving Top Priorities Target FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 1. Achieve EMS/Sustainability Goals (normalized to the number of legacy sites). Be a leader among DOE offices in sustainability. Annual  2. Publish Post Competition Accountability Report on the LM internet. Quarterly  3. Conduct independent evaluations of key programs, projects, or technical issues by goal using

  10. NEPA Determination: LM-05-12 Amendment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5-12 Amendment NEPA Determination: LM-05-12 Amendment Obtain Access Agreement to Sample Homestake Mining Company Groundwater Monitoring Well HMC-951 Amendment CX(s) Applied: B3.1...

  11. LM Meets with Native Village of Point Hope, Alaska

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) federal and contractor staff traveled to Point Hope, Alaska, on March 3, 2014, to consult with officials from the Native Village of...

  12. LM Completes X-Ray Film Digitization Project

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) has successfully completed a project to digitize nearly 400,000 medical x‑rays of former DOE contractor employees.

  13. Analysis of LM Stakeholder Interaction and External Communications

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) makes every effort to communicate with its stakeholders through public and small group meetings, conferences, briefings, news...

  14. DOE/OFVZ1949402 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    DOEOFVZ1949402 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Contract No. ... United States Department of Energy I OakRidgeOpcrationsOfficc Under Contract No. DE-AC059 ...

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- LM Sites Map

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    LM Sites Map LM Sites 2016_USsitemap Puerto Rico Connecticut New Jersey Massachusetts Alaska Texas Florida Arizona Missouri Colorado Utah Idaho Washington South Dakota New Mexico California Oregon Tennessee Illinois Ohio Michigan New York Pennsylvania Wyoming Nebraska West Virginia Kentucky Mississippi Nevada Select a Site Acid/Pueblo Canyon Site Adrian Site Albany Site Aliquippa Site Ambrosia Lake Disposal Site Amchitka Site Ashtabula Site Bayo Canyon Site Berkeley Site Beverly Site Bluewater

  16. LM Records and Information Management Transition Guidance (May 2016) |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Records and Information Management Transition Guidance (May 2016) LM Records and Information Management Transition Guidance (May 2016) This guidance document establishes a framework for developing a Records and Information Management Transition Plan as part of the overall transition effort for a legacy site. LM Records and Information Management Transition Guidance (May 2016) (1.47 MB) More Documents & Publications Information and Records Management Transition

  17. About the Archives and Information Management Team (LM-10.2)...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    information technology (IT) services to support LM's infrastructure operations and to enhance the ability of all LM divisions to accomplish assigned objectives and missions

  18. LM Records Handling System-Freedom of Information/Privacy Act...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Freedom of InformationPrivacy Act, Office of Legacy management LM Records Handling System-Freedom of InformationPrivacy Act, Office of Legacy management LM Records Handling ...

  19. Relocation of on-site spoils pile materials at the Linde Fusrap Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schwippert, M.T.; Boyle, J.D.; Bousquet, S.M.

    2007-07-01

    During the 1940's, the Linde Division of Union Carbide used portions of their property in Tonawanda, New York for processing uranium ores under Federal Manhattan Engineering District (MED) contracts. These activities resulted in radiological contamination on portions of the property. The radionuclides of concern at the site are Radium, Thorium, and Uranium. The site is currently owned and operated by Praxair Inc., an industrial gas company. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a Record of Decision to remediate the radiologically-contaminated materials associated with MED activities in March 2000 under the authority of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The selected remedy is fully protective of human health and the environment and complies with Federal and State requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate and meets community commitments. The USACE - Buffalo District has been executing remedial activities at the site and has successfully addressed many challenges in a safe and cost effective manner through effective coordination, project management, and partnering with stakeholders. These efforts supported the successful relocation of approximately 29,000 cubic yards of stockpiled material (soils, concrete, steel, asphalt and miscellaneous non-soil) that had been generated by the property owner as a result of ongoing development of the facility. Relocation of the material was necessary to allow safe access to the surface and subsurface soils beneath the pile for sampling and analysis. During relocation operations, materials were evaluated for the presence of radiological contamination. The vast majority of material was relocated onsite and remained the property owner's responsibility. A small portion of the material required off-site disposal at a permitted disposal facility due to radiological contamination that exceeded site criteria. This paper presents details associated with the successful

  20. Program Update

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 issue of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Offce of Legacy Management (LM) Program Update. This publication is designed to provide a status of activities within LM. Please direct all comments and inquiries to lm@hq.doe.gov. January-March 2015 Visit us at http://energy.gov/lm/ Goal 4 Successful Transition from Mound Site to Mound Business Park Continues The Mound Business Park attracts a variety of businesses to the former U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Mound, Ohio, Site in Miamisburg. In

  1. Three-Part TINSSL Webinar Series: Understanding and Evaluating LM-79 &

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    LM-80 Reports for SSL Technology | Department of Energy Webcasts » Three-Part TINSSL Webinar Series: Understanding and Evaluating LM-79 & LM-80 Reports for SSL Technology Three-Part TINSSL Webinar Series: Understanding and Evaluating LM-79 & LM-80 Reports for SSL Technology This three-day webinar series focused on the fundamentals of LM-79 and LM-80 luminaire testing requirements and the use of a checklist procedure for analyzing test reports. Participants also had the opportunity

  2. EMS Programs Manual

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Environmental Management System Programs Manual (LMS/POL/S04388-3.0) is obsolete and has been removed from the LM website.

  3. Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program - 12189

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clayton, Christopher; Kothari, Vijendra; Starr, Ken; Gillespie, Joey; Widdop, Michael

    2012-07-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) was established in 1974 to address residual radiological contamination at sites where work was performed for the Manhattan Engineer District and U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Initially, FUSRAP activities began with a records search for sites that had the potential to contain residual radiological contamination; 46 sites were identified that were eligible for and required remediation. Remedial action began in 1979. In 1997, Congress assigned responsibility for the remediation of FUSRAP sites to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). DOE retains responsibility for determining if sites are eligible for FUSRAP remediation and for providing long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS and M) of remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE LTS and M activities are designed to ensure that FUSRAP sites remain protective of human health and the environment and to preserve knowledge regarding FUSRAP sites. Additional elements include eligibility determinations, transition of remediated sites from USACE to DOE, LTS and M operations such as inspections and institutional controls management, stakeholder support, preservation of records, and real property and reuse. DOE maintains close coordination with USACE and regulators to ensure there is no loss of protectiveness when sites transition to DOE for LTS and M. Over the life of the FUSRAP program from 1974 to the present, DOE's primary mission and responsibility has been to ensure that FUSRAP sites remain protective of human health and the environment. In fulfilling this mission, the DOE program includes the following key elements: eligibility determinations, transition of remediated sites from USACE to DOE, LTS and M operations such as inspections and institutional controls management, stakeholder support, preservation of records, and real property and reuse. DOE maintains close communication stakeholders as well as state and federal regulators. DOE

  4. FUSRAP Project

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... This sample was analyzed for the RcRA characteristics (TCLP total, flashpoint, reactivity, and corrosivity). - L P metals included copper and zinc. Results were negative. r ...

  5. Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program - 12189

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Clayton, Christopher; Kothari, Vijendra; Starr, Ken; Gillespie, Joey; Widdop, Michael; none,

    2012-02-26

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) was established in 1974 to address residual radiological contamination at sites where work was performed for the Manhattan Engineer District and U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Initially, FUSRAP activities began with a records search for sites that had the potential to contain residual radiological contamination; 46 sites were identified that were eligible for and required remediation. Remedial action began in 1979. In 1997, Congress assigned responsibility for the remediation of FUSRAP sites to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). DOE retains responsibility for determining if sites are eligible for FUSRAP remediation and for providing long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) of remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE LTS&M activities are designed to ensure that FUSRAP sites remain protective of human health and the environment and to preserve knowledge regarding FUSRAP sites. Additional elements include eligibility determinations, transition of remediated sites from USACE to DOE, LTS&M operations such as inspections and institutional controls management, stakeholder support, preservation of records, and real property and reuse. DOE maintains close coordination with USACE and regulators to ensure there is no loss of protectiveness when sites transition to DOE for LTS&M.

  6. Amendment to LM-07-12 for Fiber Optic Cable Trenching at the...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Amendment to LM-07-12 for Fiber Optic Cable Trenching at the Westminster, Colorado, Office Amendment to LM-07-12 for Fiber Optic Cable Trenching at the Westminster, Colorado, ...

  7. About the Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Team (LM-10.3) |...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Team (LM-10.3) About the Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Team (LM-10.3) The Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Team provides financial management...

  8. Text-Alternative Version: Understanding and Evaluating In Situ TMP and LM-80 Reports

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Below is the text-alternative version of Day 2 of the three-part TINSSL Webinar Series "Understanding and Evaluating LM-79 & LM-80 Reports for SSL Technology," held August 11, 2010.

  9. DOI-LM-NV-W010-2012-0061-CX | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    LM-NV-W010-2012-0061-CX Jump to: navigation, search NEPA Document Collection for: DOI-LM-NV-W010-2012-0061-CX CX at Desert Queen Geothermal Area for GeothermalExploration, CX for...

  10. Efficacy of 45 lm/W Achieved in White OLED

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Universal Display Corporation (UDC) successfully demonstrated an all phosphorescent white organic light emitting diode (WOLED™) with a power efficacy of 45 lm/W at 1,000 cd/m2. This high-efficacy device was enabled by lowering the device operating voltage, increasing the outcoupling efficiency to ~40% from ~20%, and by incorporating highly efficient phosphorescent emitters that are capable of converting nearly all current passing through a WOLED into light.

  11. LM Records Handling System-Fernald Historical Records System, Office of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Legacy Management | Department of Energy Fernald Historical Records System, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System-Fernald Historical Records System, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System-Fernald Historical Records System, Office of Legacy Management LM Records Handling System-Fernald Historical Records System, Office of Legacy Management (489.96 KB) More Documents & Publications LM Records Handling System (LMRHS01) - Electronic Records Keeping System,

  12. LM Records Handling System-Freedom of Information/Privacy Act, Office of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Legacy management | Department of Energy Freedom of Information/Privacy Act, Office of Legacy management LM Records Handling System-Freedom of Information/Privacy Act, Office of Legacy management LM Records Handling System-Freedom of Information/Privacy Act, Office of Legacy management LM Records Handling System-Freedom of Information/Privacy Act, Office of Legacy management (503.75 KB) More Documents & Publications LM Records Handling System-Fernald Historical Records System, Office of

  13. DOE Order 430.2B Executable Plan for LM (DOE FEMP Final) 2009 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Order 430.2B Executable Plan for LM (DOE FEMP Final) 2009 DOE Order 430.2B Executable Plan for LM (DOE FEMP Final) 2009 DOE Order 430.2B Executable Plan for LM (DOE FEMP Final) 2009 2009 (239.55 KB) More Documents & Publications DOE Order 430.2B Executable Plan for LM 2008 RPAM & Energy Order Requirements 2015 Site Sustainability

  14. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- ANC Gas Hills Site - 040

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ANC Gas Hills Site - 040 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: ANC Gas Hills Site (040) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Gas Hills West, WY, Disposal Site Location: Fremont County, WY Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  15. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Chevron Panna Maria Site - 030

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Chevron Panna Maria Site - 030 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Chevron Panna Maria Site (030) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Panna Maria, TX, Disposal Site Location: Panna Maria, Texas Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes

  16. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Conoco Conquista Site - 031

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Conoco Conquista Site - 031 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Conoco Conquista Site (031) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Conquista, TX, Disposal Site Location: Conquista, Texas Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  17. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Dawn Ford Site - 038

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Dawn Ford Site - 038 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Dawn Ford Site (038) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Ford, WA, Disposal Site Location: Ford, Washington Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary Radioactive Materials

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- EFB White Mesa Site - 033

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    EFB White Mesa Site - 033 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: EFB White Mesa Site (033 ) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: White Mesa, UT, Disposal Site Location: White Mesa, Utah Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  19. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Exxon Ray Point Site - 032

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Exxon Ray Point Site - 032 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Exxon Ray Point Site (032) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Ray Point, TX, Disposal Site Location: Live Oak County, Texas Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  20. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Hecla Durita Site - 012

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Hecla Durita Site - 012 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Hecla Durita Site (012 ) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Durita, CO, Disposal Site Location: Montrose County, Colorado Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Kennecott Sweetwater Site - 041

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Kennecott Sweetwater Site - 041 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Kennecott Sweetwater Site (041) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Sweetwater, WY, Disposal Site Location: Sweetwater County, Wyoming Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials

  2. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Pathfinder Lucky Mc Site - 042

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Pathfinder Lucky Mc Site - 042 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Pathfinder Lucky Mc Site (042) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Gas Hills North, WY, Disposal Site Location: Fremont County, Wyoming Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Plateau Shootaring Canyon Site - 034

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Plateau Shootaring Canyon Site - 034 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Plateau Shootaring Canyon Site (034 ) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Shootaring Canyon, UT, Disposal Site Location: Garfield County, Utah Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive

  4. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Rio Algom Lisbon Valley Site - 035

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Rio Algom Lisbon Valley Site - 035 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: Rio Algom Lisbon Valley Site (035 ) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Lisbon Valley, UT, Disposal Site Location: La Sal, Utah Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials Handled:

  5. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- WNI Split Rock Site - 043

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Split Rock Site - 043 FUSRAP Considered Sites Site: WNI Split Rock Site (043) Active UMTRCA Title II site; when complete, site will be managed by LM Designated Name: Not Designated under FUSRAP Alternate Name: Split Rock, WY, Disposal Site Location: Fremont County, Wyoming Evaluation Year: Not considered for FUSRAP - in another program Site Operations: Disposal site Site Disposition: Remediation under UMTRCA Title II - site not ready to transition Radioactive Materials Handled: Yes Primary

  6. L.m, Libby and W.F. Libby

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    A72--^^ir ^ ; ^ | ) ' yULCANISm ftND RADIOCARBON DATES L.m, Libby and W.F. Libby ttolytprsity n f C a l i f o r n i a _ Los Angeles, C a l i f o r n i a , U.S.A. ABSTRACT Ule consider whether the long term perturbation of radiocarbon dates, which is known to be approximately a sin function of period about 8000 years and amplitude of about B% peak-to-peak, could have been caused in any major part by vulcanism. We conclude that this is not the case. On the contrary, present day volcanoes are a far

  7. Quantifying Contaminant Mass for the Feasibility Study of the DuPont Chambers Works FUSRAP Site - 13510

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Young, Carl; Rahman, Mahmudur; Johnson, Ann; Owe, Stephan

    2013-07-01

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - Philadelphia District is conducting an environmental restoration at the DuPont Chambers Works in Deepwater, New Jersey under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Discrete locations are contaminated with natural uranium, thorium-230 and radium-226. The USACE is proposing a preferred remedial alternative consisting of excavation and offsite disposal to address soil contamination followed by monitored natural attenuation to address residual groundwater contamination. Methods were developed to quantify the error associated with contaminant volume estimates and use mass balance calculations of the uranium plume to estimate the removal efficiency of the proposed alternative. During the remedial investigation, the USACE collected approximately 500 soil samples at various depths. As the first step of contaminant mass estimation, soil analytical data was segmented into several depth intervals. Second, using contouring software, analytical data for each depth interval was contoured to determine lateral extent of contamination. Six different contouring algorithms were used to generate alternative interpretations of the lateral extent of the soil contamination. Finally, geographical information system software was used to produce a three dimensional model in order to present both lateral and vertical extent of the soil contamination and to estimate the volume of impacted soil for each depth interval. The average soil volume from all six contouring methods was used to determine the estimated volume of impacted soil. This method also allowed an estimate of a standard deviation of the waste volume estimate. It was determined that the margin of error for the method was plus or minus 17% of the waste volume, which is within the acceptable construction contingency for cost estimation. USACE collected approximately 190 groundwater samples from 40 monitor wells. It is expected that excavation and disposal of

  8. LM-research opportunities and activities at Beer-Sheva

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lesin, S.

    1996-06-01

    Energy conversion concepts based on liquid metal (LM) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) technology was intensively investigated at the Center for MHD Studies (CMHDS), in the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel. LMMHD energy conversion systems operate in a closed cycle as follows: heat intended for conversion into electricity is added to a liquid metal contained in a closed loop of pipes. The liquid metal is mixed with vapor or gas introduced from outside so that a two-phase mixture is formed. The gaseous phase performs a thermodynamic cycle, converting a certain amount of heat into mechanical energy of the liquid metal. This energy is converted into electrical power as the metal flows across a magnetic field in the MHD channel. Those systems where the expanding thermodynamic fluid performs work against gravitational forces (natural circulation loops) and using heavy liquid metals are named ETGAR systems. A number of different heavy-metal facilities have been specially constructed and tested with fluid combinations of mercury and steam, mercury and nitrogen, mercury and freon, lead-bismuth and steam, and lead and steam. Since the experimental investigation of such flows is a very difficult task and all the known measurment methods are incomplete and not fully reliable, a variety of experimental approaches have been developed. In most experiments, instantaneous pressure distribution along the height of the upcomer were measured and the average void fraction was calculated numerically using the one-dimensional equation for the two-phase flow. The research carried out at the CMHDS led to significant improvements in the characterization of the two-phase phenomena expected in the riser of ETGAR systems. One of the most important outcomes is the development of a new empirical correlation which enables the reliable prediction of the velocity ratio between the LM and the steam (slip), the friction factor, as well as of the steam void fraction distribution along the riser.

  9. Vicinity Property Assessments at Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Project Sites in the New York District - 13420

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ewy, Ann; Hays, David

    2013-07-01

    The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) has addressed sites across the nation for almost 4 decades. Multiple stake holder pressures, multiple regulations, and process changes occur over such long time periods. These result in many challenges to the FUSRAP project teams. Initial FUSRAP work was not performed under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Records of Decision (ROD). The ROD identifies the remedy decision and ultimately the criteria to be used to release a site. Early FUSRAP projects used DOE Orders or the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) standards. Under current RODs, regulations may differ, resulting in different cleanup criteria than that used in prior Vicinity Property (VP) remediation. The USACE, in preparation for closeout of Sites, conducts reviews to evaluate whether prior actions were sufficient to meet the cleanup criteria specified in the current ROD. On the basis of these reviews, USACE has conducted additional sampling, determined that prior actions were sufficient, or conducted additional remediation consistent with the selected remedy in the ROD. As the public pressures, regulations, and processes that the FUSRAP encounters continue to change, the program itself continues to evolve. Assessment of VPs at FUSRAP sites is a necessary step in the life cycle of our site management. (authors)

  10. Effect of soil erosion on the long-term stability of FUSRAP near-surface waste-burial sites

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Knight, M.J.

    1983-04-01

    Decontamination of FUSRAP sites could result in the generation of large volumes (in excess of 400,000 m/sup 3/) of low-activity radioactive wastes (primarily contaminated soil and building materials) requiring subsequent disposal. It is likely that near-surface burial will be seriously considered as an option for disposal of these materials. A number of factors - including soil erosion - could adversely affect the long-term stability of a near-surface waste-burial site. The majority of FUSRAP sites are located in the humid eastern United States, where the principal cause of erosion is the action of water. This report examines the effect of soil erosion by water on burial-site stability based on analysis of four hypothetical near-surface burial sites. The Universal Soil Loss Equation was employed to estimate average annual soil loss from burial sites and the 1000-year effects of soil loss on the soil barrier (burial trench cap) placed over low-activity wastes. Results suggest that the land use of the burial site and the slope gradient of the burial trench cap significantly affect the rate of soil erosion. The development of measures limiting the potential land use of a burial site (e.g., mixing large rocks into the burial trench cap) may be required to preserve the integrity of a burial trench for long periods of time.